Pinnacle Financial Partners
Table of Contents

 
 
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(mark one)
     
þ   QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2007
or
     
o   TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OF 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from                      to                     
Commission File Number: 000-31225
(PINNACLE LOGO), Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
     
Tennessee   62-1812853
     
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or   (I.R.S. Employer Identification
organization)   No.)
     
211 Commerce Street, Suite 300, Nashville, Tennessee   37201
     
(Address of principal executive offices)   (Zip Code)
(615) 744-3700
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
Not Applicable
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changes since last report)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes þ      No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of “accelerated filer and large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large Accelerated Filer o      Accelerated Filer þ      Non-accelerated Filer o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
Yes o      No þ
As of April 30, 2007 there were 15,534,975 shares of common stock, $1.00 par value per share, issued and outstanding.
 
 

 


 

Pinnacle Financial Partners, Inc.
Report on Form 10-Q
March 31, 2007
TABLE OF CONTENTS
         
    Page No.
       
 
       
    2  
 
       
    22  
 
       
    41  
 
       
    41  
 
       
       
 
       
    42  
 
       
    42  
 
       
    42  
 
       
    42  
 
       
    42  
 
       
    42  
 
       
    43  
 
       
    44  
 Ex-31.1 Section 302 Certification
 Ex-31.2 Section 302 Certification
 Ex-32.1 Section 906 Certification
 Ex-32.2 Section 906 Certification
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
Pinnacle Financial Partners, Inc. (“Pinnacle Financial”) may from time to time make written or oral statements, including statements contained in this report which may constitute forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”). The words “expect”, “anticipate”, “intend”, “consider”, “plan”, “believe”, “seek”, “should”, “estimate”, and similar expressions are intended to identify such forward-looking statements, but other statements may constitute forward-looking statements. These statements should be considered subject to various risks and uncertainties. Such forward-looking statements are made based upon management’s belief as well as assumptions made by, and information currently available to, management pursuant to “safe harbor” provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Pinnacle Financial’s actual results may differ materially from the results anticipated in forward-looking statements due to a variety of factors. Such factors are described below and in Pinnacle Financial’s Form 10-K, as updated by Item 1A of part II of this Form 10-Q and include, without limitation, (i) unanticipated deterioration in the financial condition of borrowers resulting in significant increases in loan losses and provisions for those losses, (ii) increased competition with other financial institutions, (iii) lack of sustained growth in the economy in the Nashville, Tennessee or Knoxville, Tennessee areas, (iv) rapid fluctuations or unanticipated changes in interest rates, (v) the inability of our bank subsidiary, Pinnacle National Bank to satisfy regulatory requirements for its expansion plans, (vi) the inability of Pinnacle Financial to achieve its targeted expansion goals in the Knoxville, Tennessee market, (vii) the ability of Pinnacle Financial to grow its loan portfolio at historic or planned rates and (viii) changes in the legislative and regulatory environment, including compliance with the various provisions of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. Many of such factors are beyond Pinnacle Financial’s ability to control or predict, and readers are cautioned not to put undue reliance on such forward-looking statements. Pinnacle Financial does not intend to update or reissue any forward-looking statements contained in this report as a result of new information or other circumstances that may become known to Pinnacle Financial.

Page 1


Table of Contents

Part I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1.
PINNACLE FINANCIAL PARTNERS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(Unaudited)
                 
    March 31,   December 31,
    2007   2006
     
ASSETS
               
Cash and noninterest-bearing due from banks
  $ 47,180,452     $ 43,611,533  
Interest-bearing due from banks
    4,847,745       1,041,174  
Federal funds sold
    35,633,489       47,866,143  
     
Cash and cash equivalents
    87,661,686       92,518,850  
 
               
Securities available-for-sale, at fair value
    313,169,577       319,237,428  
Securities held-to-maturity (fair value of $26,482,598 and $26,594,235 at March 31, 2007 and December 31, 2006, respectively)
    27,085,811       27,256,876  
Mortgage loans held-for-sale
    11,668,414       5,654,381  
 
               
Loans
    1,553,980,356       1,497,734,824  
Less allowance for loan losses
    (16,792,017 )     (16,117,978 )
     
Loans, net
    1,537,188,339       1,481,616,846  
 
               
Premises and equipment, net
    37,638,657       36,285,796  
Investments in unconsolidated subsidiaries and other entities
    16,879,642       16,200,684  
Accrued interest receivable
    10,785,658       11,019,173  
Goodwill
    114,287,640       114,287,640  
Core deposit intangible, net
    10,869,252       11,385,006  
Other assets
    25,897,746       26,724,183  
     
Total assets
  $ 2,193,132,422     $ 2,142,186,863  
     
 
               
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
               
Deposits:
               
Noninterest-bearing demand
  $ 306,885,434     $ 300,977,814  
Interest-bearing demand
    249,691,538       236,674,425  
Savings and money market accounts
    499,476,036       485,935,897  
Time
    644,079,127       598,823,167  
     
Total deposits
    1,700,132,135       1,622,411,303  
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase
    116,951,631       141,015,761  
Federal Home Loan Bank advances
    26,712,224       53,725,833  
Federal funds purchased
    19,907,000        
Subordinated debt
    51,548,000       51,548,000  
Accrued interest payable
    4,484,595       4,952,422  
Other liabilities
    10,480,316       12,516,523  
     
Total liabilities
    1,930,215,901       1,886,169,842  
Stockholders’ equity:
               
Preferred stock, no par value; 10,000,000 shares authorized; no shares issued and outstanding
           
Common stock, par value $1.00; 90,000,000 shares authorized; 15,530,975 issued and outstanding at March 31, 2007 and 15,446,074 issued and outstanding at December 31, 2006
    15,530,975       15,446,074  
Additional paid-in capital
    212,333,180       211,502,516  
Retained earnings
    36,711,165       31,109,324  
Accumulated other comprehensive loss, net
    (1,658,799 )     (2,040,893 )
     
Total stockholders’ equity
    262,916,521       256,017,021  
     
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity
  $ 2,193,132,422     $ 2,142,186,863  
     
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

Page 2


Table of Contents

PINNACLE FINANCIAL PARTNERS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
(Unaudited)
                 
    Three months ended
March 31,
    2007   2006
     
Interest income:
               
Loans, including fees
  $ 28,977,224     $ 13,178,830  
Securities:
               
Taxable
    3,346,120       2,861,118  
Tax-exempt
    669,519       400,773  
Federal funds sold and other
    746,379       369,675  
     
Total interest income
    33,739,242       16,810,396  
     
 
               
Interest expense:
               
Deposits
    13,537,263       5,850,307  
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase
    1,712,091       508,788  
Federal funds purchased and other borrowings
    1,407,460       944,498  
     
Total interest expense
    16,656,814       7,303,593  
     
Net interest income
    17,082,428       9,506,803  
Provision for loan losses
    787,966       387,184  
     
Net interest income after provision for loan losses
    16,294,462       9,119,619  
 
               
Noninterest income:
               
Service charges on deposit accounts
    1,797,149       438,269  
Investment sales commissions
    734,560       513,597  
Insurance sales commissions
    636,962       264,828  
Gain on loans and loan participations sold, net
    363,306       324,546  
Trust fees
    420,290       52,000  
Other noninterest income
    1,073,316       455,011  
     
Total noninterest income
    5,025,583       2,048,251  
     
 
               
Noninterest expense:
               
Compensation and employee benefits
    8,266,501       4,448,357  
Equipment and occupancy
    2,164,702       1,173,353  
Marketing and other business development
    251,735       190,471  
Postage and supplies
    454,916       185,409  
Amortization of core deposit intangible
    515,754       131,682  
Other noninterest expense
    1,470,083       756,612  
Merger related expense
          443,330  
     
Total noninterest expense
    13,123,691       7,329,214  
     
Income before income taxes
    8,196,354       3,838,656  
Income tax expense
    2,594,513       1,226,760  
     
Net income
  $ 5,601,841     $ 2,611,896  
     
 
               
Per share information:
               
Basic net income per common share
  $ 0.36     $ 0.27  
     
Diluted net income per common share
  $ 0.34     $ 0.24  
     
 
               
Weighted average shares outstanding:
               
Basic
    15,433,442       9,578,813  
Diluted
    16,617,484       10,745,626  
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

Page 3


Table of Contents

PINNACLE FINANCIAL PARTNERS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
(Unaudited)
For the three months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006
                                                         
    Common Stock                                
                                            Accumulated    
                    Additional                   Other   Total
                    Paid-in   Unearned   Retained   Comprehensive   Stockholders’
    Shares   Amount   Capital   Compensation   Earnings   Income (Loss)   Equity
     
Balances, December 31, 2005
    8,426,551     $ 8,426,551     $ 44,890,912     $ (169,689 )   $ 13,182,291     $ (2,893,640 )   $ 63,436,425  
Transfer of unearned compensation to additional paid-in capital upon adoption of SFAS No. 123(R)
                (169,689 )     169,689                    
Exercise of employee common stock options and related tax benefits
    14,180       14,180       109,112                         123,292  
Issuance of restricted common shares pursuant to 2004 Equity Incentive Plan
    3,600       3,600       (3,600 )                        
Merger with Cavalry Bancorp, Inc.
    6,856,298       6,856,298       164,231,274                         171,087,572  
Costs to register common stock issued in connection with the merger with Cavalry Bancorp, Inc.
                (177,202 )                       (177,202 )
Compensation expense for restricted stock
                34,085                         34,085  
Compensation expense for stock options
                152,596                         152,596  
Comprehensive income:
                                                       
Net income
                            2,611,896             2,611,896  
Net unrealized holding losses on available-for-sale securities, net of deferred tax benefit of $487,229
                                  (789,307 )     (789,307 )
 
                                                       
Total comprehensive income
                                                    1,822,589  
     
Balances, March 31, 2006
    15,300,629     $ 15,300,629     $ 209,067,488     $     $ 15,794,187     $ (3,682,947 )   $ 236,479,357  
     
 
                                                       
Balances, December 31, 2006
    15,446,074     $ 15,446,074     $ 211,502,516     $     $ 31,109,324     $ (2,040,893 )   $ 256,017,021  
Exercise of employee common stock options and related tax benefits
    58,475       58,475       389,808                         448,283  
Issuance of restricted common shares pursuant to 2004 Equity Incentive Plan
    26,426       26,426       (26,426 )                        
Compensation expense for restricted stock
                105,282                         105,282  
Compensation expense for stock options
                362,000                         362,000  
Comprehensive income:
                                                       
Net income
                            5,601,841             5,601,841  
Net unrealized holding gains on available-for-sale securities, net of deferred tax expense of $234,187
                                  382,094       382,094  
 
                                                       
Total comprehensive income
                                                    5,983,935  
     
Balances, March 31, 2007
    15,530,975     $ 15,530,975     $ 212,333,180     $     $ 36,711,165     $ (1,658,799 )   $ 262,916,521  
     
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

Page 4


Table of Contents

PINNACLE FINANCIAL PARTNERS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)
                 
    Three months ended
    March 31,
    2007   2006
     
Operating activities:
               
Net income
  $ 5,601,841     $ 2,611,896  
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities:
               
Net amortization of premium on securities
    132,221       244,351  
Depreciation and net amortization
    1,823,194       725,676  
Provision for loan losses
    787,966       387,184  
Gains on loans and loan participations sold, net
    (363,306 )     (324,546 )
Stock-based compensation expense
    467,282       186,681  
Deferred tax benefit
    (1,310,271 )     (357,492 )
Excess tax benefit from stock compensation
    (20,742 )     (41,991 )
Mortgage loans held for sale:
               
Loans originated
    (36,739,515 )     (21,034,095 )
Loans sold
    31,044,228       20,558,889  
Increase in other assets
    2,035,596       (898,056 )
Decrease in other liabilities
    (2,504,034 )     (11,294,420 )
     
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities
    954,460       (9,235,923 )
     
 
               
Investing activities:
               
Activities in securities available-for-sale:
               
Purchases
    (3,355,360 )     (5,916,658 )
Sales
           
Maturities, prepayments and calls
    10,078,338       7,479,033  
     
 
    6,722,978       1,562,375  
     
Increase in loans, net
    (56,801,579 )     (36,688,382 )
Purchases of premises and equipment and software
    (2,292,955 )     (233,346 )
Cash and cash equivalents acquired in merger with Cavalry Bancorp, Inc., net of acquisition costs
          37,420,210  
Investments in unconsolidated subsidiaries and other entities
    (718,846 )      
Purchases of other assets
          (78,975 )
     
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities
    (53,090,402 )     1,981,882  
     
 
               
Financing activities:
               
Net increase in deposits
    78,001,234       22,167,707  
Net decrease in securities sold under agreements to repurchase
    (24,064,130 )     (1,922,321 )
Net increase in Federal funds purchased
    19,907,000        
Advances from Federal Home Loan Bank:
               
Issuances
          31,000,000  
Payments
    (27,013,609 )     (23,000,000 )
Exercise of common stock options
    427,541       81,301  
Excess tax benefit from stock compensation
    20,742       41,991  
Costs incurred in connection with registration of common stock issued in merger
          (177,202 )
     
Net cash provided by financing activities
    47,278,778       28,191,476  
     
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
    (4,857,164 )     20,937,435  
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period
    92,518,850       58,654,270  
     
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period
  $ 87,661,686     $ 79,591,705  
     
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

Page 5


Table of Contents

PINNACLE FINANCIAL PARTNERS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
Note 1. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
     Nature of Business — Pinnacle Financial Partners, Inc. (Pinnacle Financial) is a bank holding company whose primary business is conducted by its wholly-owned subsidiary, Pinnacle National Bank (Pinnacle National). Pinnacle National is a commercial bank located in Nashville, Tennessee. Pinnacle National provides a full range of banking services in its primary market areas of Davidson, Rutherford, Williamson, Sumner and Bedford Counties.
     Basis of Presentation — These consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Pinnacle Financial and its wholly-owned subsidiaries. PNFP Statutory Trust I, PNFP Statutory Trust II, PNFP Statutory Trust III and Collateral Plus, LLC, are affiliates of Pinnacle Financial and are included in these consolidated financial statements pursuant to the equity method of accounting. Significant intercompany transactions and accounts are eliminated in consolidation.
     Use of Estimates — The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities as of the balance sheet date and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Material estimates that are particularly susceptible to significant change in the near term include the determination of the allowance for loan losses.
     Impairment — Long-lived assets, including purchased intangible assets subject to amortization, such as Pinnacle Financial’s core deposit intangible asset, are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. Recoverability of assets to be held and used is measured by a comparison of the carrying amount of an asset to estimated undiscounted future cash flows expected to be generated by the asset. If the carrying amount of an asset exceeds its estimated future cash flows, an impairment charge is recognized for the excess of the carrying amount over the fair value of the asset. Assets to be disposed of are reported at the lower of the carrying amount or fair value less costs to sell, and are no longer depreciated.
     Goodwill and intangible assets that have indefinite useful lives are tested annually for impairment, and more frequently if events and circumstances indicate that the asset might be impaired. An impairment loss is recognized to the extent that the carrying amount exceeds the asset’s fair value. Pinnacle Financial’s annual assessment date is as of September 30 such that the assessment will be completed during the fourth quarter of each year. Should Pinnacle Financial determine in a future period that the goodwill recorded in connection with the acquisition of Cavalry Bancorp, Inc. (“Cavalry”) has been impaired, then a charge to earnings will be recorded in the period such determination is made.
     Cash and Cash Flows — Cash on hand, cash items in process of collection, amounts due from banks, Federal funds sold and securities purchased under agreements to resell, with original maturities within ninety days, are included in cash and cash equivalents. The following supplemental cash flow information addresses certain cash payments and noncash transactions for each of the three months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006 as follows:
                 
    For the three months ended March 31,
    2007   2006
     
Cash Payments:
               
Interest
  $ 16,469,389     $ 7,764,144  
Income taxes
    1,100,000       400,000  
Noncash Transactions:
               
Loans charged-off to the allowance for loan losses
    187,818       43,976  
Loans foreclosed upon with repossessions transferred to other assets
    110,570        
Common stock and options issued to acquire Cavalry Bancorp, Inc
          171,087,572  

Page 6


Table of Contents

PINNACLE FINANCIAL PARTNERS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
     Income Per Common Share — Basic earnings per share (“EPS”) is computed by dividing net income by the weighted average common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted EPS reflects the dilution that could occur if securities or other contracts to issue common stock were exercised or converted. The difference between basic and diluted weighted average shares outstanding was attributable to common stock options, warrants and restricted shares. The dilutive effect of outstanding options, warrants and restricted shares is reflected in diluted earnings per share by application of the treasury stock method.
     As of March 31, 2007 and 2006, there were common stock options outstanding to purchase 1,846,000 and 1,602,000 common shares, respectively. Most of these options have exercise prices and compensation costs attributable to future services, which when considered in relation to the average market price of Pinnacle Financial’s common stock, are considered dilutive and are considered in Pinnacle Financial’s diluted income per share calculation for the three months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006. There were common stock options of 618,000, and 388,000 outstanding as of March 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively, which were considered anti-dilutive and thus have not been considered in the diluted earnings per share calculations below. Additionally, as of March 31, 2007 and 2006, Pinnacle Financial had outstanding warrants to purchase 395,000 and 406,000, respectively, of common shares which have been considered in the calculation of Pinnacle Financial’s diluted net income per share for three months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006.
     The following is a summary of the basic and diluted earnings per share calculation for the three months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006:
                 
    For the three months ended March 31,
    2007   2006
     
Basic earnings per share calculation:
               
Numerator - Net income
  $ 5,601,841     $ 2,611,896  
 
               
Denominator - Average common shares outstanding
    15,433,442       9,578,813  
 
               
Basic net income per share
  $ 0.36     $ 0.27  
 
               
Diluted earnings per share calculation:
               
Numerator - Net income
  $ 5,601,841     $ 2,611,896  
 
               
Denominator - Average common shares outstanding
    15,433,442       9,578,813  
Dilutive shares contingently issuable
    1,184,042       1,166,813  
     
Average diluted common shares outstanding
    16,617,484       10,745,626  
     
Diluted net income per share
  $ 0.34     $ 0.24  
     Comprehensive Income — SFAS No. 130, “Reporting Comprehensive Income” describes comprehensive income as the total of all components of comprehensive income including net income. Other comprehensive income refers to revenues, expenses, gains and losses that under U.S. generally accepted accounting principles are included in comprehensive income but excluded from net income. Currently, Pinnacle Financial’s other comprehensive income consists of unrealized gains and losses, net of deferred income taxes, on securities available-for-sale.
Note 2. Merger with Cavalry Bancorp, Inc.
     On March 15, 2006, Pinnacle Financial consummated its merger with Cavalry Bancorp, Inc. (“Cavalry”), a one-bank holding company located in Murfreesboro, Tennessee. Pursuant to the merger agreement, Pinnacle acquired all of the outstanding shares of Cavalry common stock via a tax-free exchange whereby Cavalry shareholders received a fixed exchange ratio of 0.95 shares of Pinnacle Financial common stock for each share of Cavalry common stock, or approximately 6.9 million Pinnacle Financial shares. The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the activities of the former Cavalry since March 15, 2006.

Page 7


Table of Contents

PINNACLE FINANCIAL PARTNERS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
     In accordance with SFAS No. 141, “Accounting for Business Combinations” (“SFAS No. 141”), SFAS No. 142, “Goodwill and Intangible Assets” (“SFAS No. 142”) and SFAS No. 147, “Acquisition of Certain Financial Institutions” (“SFAS No. 147”), Pinnacle Financial recorded at fair value the following assets and liabilities of Cavalry as of March 15, 2006:
         
Cash and cash equivalents
  $ 37,420,210  
Investment securities — available-for-sale
    39,476,178  
Loans, net of an allowance for loan losses of $5,102,296
    545,598,367  
Goodwill
    114,287,640  
Core deposit intangible
    13,168,236  
Other assets
    42,936,956  
 
     
Total assets acquired
    792,887,587  
 
     
 
       
Deposits
    583,992,422  
Federal Home Loan Bank advances
    17,766,661  
Other liabilities
    18,851,261  
 
     
Total liabilities assumed
    620,610,344  
 
     
Total consideration paid for Cavalry
  $ 172,277,243  
 
     
     As shown in the table above, total consideration for Cavalry approximates $172.3 million of which $171.1 million was in the form of Pinnacle Financial common shares and options to acquire Pinnacle Financial common shares and $1.2 million in investment banking fees, attorney’s fees and other costs related to the acquisition which have been accounted for as a component of the purchase price. Pinnacle Financial issued 6,856,298 shares of Pinnacle Financial common stock to the former Cavalry shareholders. In accordance with EITF No. 99-12, “Determination of the Measurement Date for the Market Price of Acquirer Securities Issued in a Purchase Business Combination,” the consideration shares were valued at $24.53 per common share which represents the average closing price of Pinnacle Financial common stock from the two days prior to the merger announcement on September 30, 2005 through the two days after the merger announcement. Aggregate consideration for the common stock issued was approximately $168.2 million. Additionally, Pinnacle Financial also has assumed the Cavalry Bancorp, Inc. 1999 Stock Incentive Plan (the “Cavalry Plan”) pursuant to which Pinnacle is obligated to issue 195,551 shares of Pinnacle Financial common stock upon exercise of stock options awarded to certain former Cavalry employees who held outstanding options as of March 15, 2006. All of these options were fully vested prior to the merger announcement date and expire at various dates between 2011 and 2012. The exercise prices for these stock options range between $10.26 per share and $13.68 per share. In accordance with SFAS No. 141, Pinnacle Financial has considered the fair value of these options in determining the acquisition cost of Cavalry. The fair value of these vested options approximated $2.9 million which has been included as a component of the aggregate purchase price.
     In accordance with SFAS Nos. 141 and 142, Pinnacle Financial recognized $13.2 million as a core deposit intangible in connection with its merger with Cavalry. This identified intangible is being amortized over seven years using an accelerated method which anticipates the life of the underlying deposits to which the intangible is attributable. For the three months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006, approximately $516,000 and $132,000 of amortization, respectively, was recognized in the accompanying statement of income as other noninterest expense. Amortization expense associated with this identified intangible will approximate $1.8 million to $2.1 million per year for the next four years with lesser amounts for the remaining two years.
     Pinnacle Financial also recorded other adjustments to the carrying value of Cavalry’s assets and liabilities in order to reflect the fair value of those net assets in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, including a $4.8 million discount associated with the loan portfolio, a $2.9 million premium for Cavalry’s certificates of deposit and a $4.6 million premium for Cavalry’s land and buildings. Pinnacle Financial also recorded the corresponding deferred tax assets or liabilities associated with these adjustments. The discounts and premiums related to financial assets and liabilities are being amortized into the statements of income using a method that approximates the level yield method over the anticipated lives of the underlying financial assets or liabilities. For the three months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006, the accretion of the fair value discounts related to the acquired loans and certificates of deposit increased net interest income by approximately $833,000 and $431,000, respectively. Based on the estimated useful lives of the acquired loans and deposits, Pinnacle Financial expects to recognize increases in net interest income related to accretion of these purchase accounting adjustments of $3.2 million for the remainder of 2007 and in subsequent years.
     Statement of Position 03-03, Accounting for Certain Loans or Debt Securities Acquired in a Transfer (“SOP 03-03”) addresses accounting for differences between contractual cash flows and cash flows expected to be collected from an investor’s initial

Page 8


Table of Contents

PINNACLE FINANCIAL PARTNERS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
investment in loans or debt securities (loans) acquired in a transfer if those differences are attributable, at least in part, to credit quality. It includes loans acquired in purchase business combinations and applies to all nongovernmental entities, including not-for-profit organizations. The SOP does not apply to loans originated by the entity. At March 15, 2006, Pinnacle Financial identified $3.9 million in loans to which the application of the provisions of SOP 03-03 was required. The purchase accounting adjustments reflect a reduction in loans and the allowance for loan losses of $1.0 million related to Cavalry’s impaired loans, thus reducing the carrying value of these loans to $2.9 million as of March 15, 2006. At March 31, 2007, the carrying value of these loans had been reduced to $935,000 due to cash payments received from the borrowers.
     The following pro forma income statements assume the merger was consummated on January 1, 2006. The pro forma information does not reflect Pinnacle Financial’s results of operations that would have actually occurred had the merger been consummated on such date (dollars in thousands, except per share information).
                 
    Three months ended March 31,
    2007   2006(1)
     
Pro Forma Income Statements:
               
Net interest income
  $ 17,129     $ 15,952  
Provision for loan losses
    788       1,368  
Noninterest income
    5,026       4,445  
Noninterest expense:
               
Compensation
    8,267       7,089  
Other noninterest expense
    4,857       5,138  
     
Net income before taxes
    8,243       6,802  
Income tax expense
    2,613       1,706  
     
Net income
  $ 5,630     $ 5,096  
     
 
               
Pro Forma Per Share Information:
               
Basic net income per common share
  $ 0.36     $ 0.33  
     
Diluted net income per common share
  $ 0.34     $ 0.31  
     
 
               
Weighted average shares outstanding:
               
Basic
    15,433,442       15,216,214  
Diluted
    16,617,484       16,383,027  
 
(1)   In preparation and as a result of the merger during 2006, Cavalry and Pinnacle Financial incurred significant merger related charges of approximately $10.5 million in the aggregate, primarily for severance benefits, accelerated vesting of defined compensation agreements, investment banker fees, etc. Including these charges would have decreased pro forma net income for the three months ended March 31, 2006 by $7.84 million resulting in a net loss of $2,742,000 and a basic and diluted pro forma net loss per share of $0.18 and $0.17, respectively.
     During the three months ended March 31, 2006, Pinnacle Financial incurred merger integration expense related to the merger with Cavalry of $443,000. These expenses were directly related to the merger, recognized as incurred and reflected on the accompanying consolidated statement of income as merger related expense.

Page 9


Table of Contents

PINNACLE FINANCIAL PARTNERS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
Note 3. Securities
     The amortized cost and fair value of securities available-for-sale and held-to-maturity at March 31, 2007 and December 31, 2006 are summarized as follows:
                                 
    March 31, 2007
            Gross   Gross    
    Amortized   Unrealized   Unrealized   Fair
    Cost   Gains   Losses   Value
     
Securities available-for-sale:
                               
U.S. Treasury securities
  $     $     $     $  
U.S. government agency securities
    37,082,560       9,139       377,336       36,714,363  
Mortgage-backed securities
    211,507,240       520,839       2,516,494       209,511,585  
State and municipal securities
    65,534,974       96,026       523,838       65,107,162  
Corporate notes and other
    1,887,167             50,700       1,836,467  
     
 
  $ 316,011,941     $ 626,004     $ 3,468,368     $ 313,169,577  
     
Securities held-to-maturity:
                               
U.S. government agency securities
  $ 17,747,294     $     $ 324,369     $ 17,422,925  
State and municipal securities
    9,338,517             278,844       9,059,673  
     
 
  $ 27,085,811     $     $ 603,213     $ 26,482,598  
     
                                 
    December 31, 2006
            Gross   Gross    
    Amortized   Unrealized   Unrealized   Fair
Securities available-for-sale:   Cost   Gains   Losses   Value
     
U.S. Treasury securities
  $     $     $     $  
U.S. Government agency securities
    38,076,428       9,739       457,321       37,628,846  
Mortgage-backed securities
    220,397,093       455,203       3,028,241       217,824,055  
State and municipal securities
    62,215,952       131,412       388,124       61,959,240  
Corporate notes
    1,887,475             62,188       1,825,287  
     
 
  $ 322,576,948     $ 596,354     $ 3,935,874     $ 319,237,428  
     
Securities held-to-maturity:
                               
U.S. government agency securities
  $ 17,747,278     $     $ 378,528     $ 17,368,700  
State and municipal securities
    9,509,648             284,113       9,225,535  
     
 
  $ 27,256,876     $     $ 662,641     $ 26,594,235  
     
     At March 31, 2007, approximately $295,092,000 of Pinnacle Financial’s investment portfolio was pledged to secure public funds and other deposits and securities sold under agreements to repurchase.

Page 10


Table of Contents

PINNACLE FINANCIAL PARTNERS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
     At March 31, 2007 and 2006, included in securities were the following investments with unrealized losses. The information below classifies these investments according to the term of the unrealized loss of less than twelve months or twelve months or longer:
                                                 
    Investments with an        
    Unrealized Loss of less than   Investments with an Unrealized   Total Investments with an
    12 months   Loss of 12 months or longer   Unrealized Loss
            Unrealized           Unrealized           Unrealized
    Fair Value   Losses   Fair Value   Losses   Fair Value   Losses
At March 31, 2007:
                                               
 
                                               
U.S. government agency securities
  $ 4,986,000     $ 14,000     $ 48,142,588     $ 687,705     $ 53,128,588     $ 701,705  
Mortgage-backed securities
    3,959,040       41,482       151,453,571       2,475,012       155,412,611       2,516,494  
State and municipal securities
    20,007,372       81,599       38,675,813       721,083       58,683,185       802,682  
Corporate notes
                1,836,467       50,700       1,836,467       50,700  
     
Total temporarily-impaired securities
  $ 28,952,412     $ 137,081     $ 240,108,439     $ 3,934,500     $ 269,060,851     $ 4,071,581  
     
 
                                               
At December 31, 2006:
                                               
 
                                               
U.S. government agency securities
  $     $     $ 47,988,246     $ 835,849     $ 47,988,246     $ 835,849  
Mortgage-backed securities
    13,959,080       68,965       149,496,521       2,959,276       163,455,601       3,028,241  
State and municipal securities
    13,975,595       47,071       35,660,379       625,166       49,635,974       672,237  
Corporate notes
                1,825,286       62,188       1,825,286       62,188  
     
Total temporarily-impaired securities
  $ 27,934,675     $ 116,036     $ 234,970,432     $ 4,482,479     $ 262,905,107     $ 4,598,515  
     
     Management evaluates securities for other-than-temporary impairment on at least a quarterly basis, and more frequently when economic or market concerns warrant such evaluation. Consideration is given to (1) the length of time and the extent to which the fair value has been less than cost, (2) the financial condition and near-term prospects of the issuer, and (3) the intent and ability of Pinnacle Financial to retain its investment in the issue for a period of time sufficient to allow for any anticipated recovery in fair value. Because the declines in fair value noted above were attributable to increases in interest rates and not attributable to credit quality and because Pinnacle Financial has the ability and intent to hold all of these investments until a market price recovery or maturity, the impairment of these investments is not deemed to be other-than-temporary.
Note 4. Loans and Allowance for Loan Losses
     The composition of loans at March 31, 2007 and December 31, 2006 is summarized as follows:
                 
    At March 31,   At December 31,
    2007   2006
     
Commercial real estate – Mortgage
  $ 287,498,424     $ 284,301,650  
Commercial real estate – Construction
    160,221,949       161,903,496  
Commercial – Other
    665,856,898       608,529,830  
     
Total Commercial
    1,113,577,271       1,054,734,976  
     
Consumer real estate – Mortgage
    301,524,669       299,626,769  
Consumer real estate – Construction
    92,161,976       91,193,738  
Consumer – Other
    46,716,440       52,179,341  
     
Total Consumer
    440,403,085       442,999,848  
     
Total Loans
    1,553,980,356       1,497,734,824  
Allowance for loan losses
    (16,792,017 )     (16,117,978 )
     
Loans, net
  $ 1,537,188,339     $ 1,481,616,846  
     

Page 11


Table of Contents

PINNACLE FINANCIAL PARTNERS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
     Changes in the allowance for loan losses for the three months ended March 31, 2007 and for the year ended December 31, 2006 are as follows:
                 
    March 31, 2007   December 31, 2006
     
Balance at beginning of period
  $ 16,117,978     $ 7,857,774  
Charged-off loans
    (187,818 )     (818,467 )
Recovery of previously charged-off loans
    73,891       244,343  
Allowance acquired in acquisition of Cavalry (see note 2)
          5,102,296  
Provision for loan losses
    787,966       3,732,032  
     
Balance at end of period
  $ 16,792,017     $ 16,117,978  
     
     At March 31, 2007 and at December 31, 2006, Pinnacle Financial had certain impaired loans on nonaccruing interest status. The principal balance of these nonaccrual loans amounted to $4,774,000 and $7,070,000 at March 31, 2007 and December 31, 2006, respectively. In each case, at the date such loans were placed on nonaccrual, Pinnacle Financial reversed all previously accrued interest income against current year earnings. Had nonaccruing loans been on accruing status, interest income would have been higher by $102,000 and $18,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively.
     At March 31, 2007, Pinnacle Financial had granted loans and other extensions of credit amounting to approximately $23,035,000 to certain directors, executive officers, and their related entities, of which $17,639,000 had been drawn upon. During the three months ended March 31, 2007, $1,018,000 of new loans to certain directors, executive officers, and their related entities were made and repayments totaled $237,000. At December 31, 2006, Pinnacle Financial had granted loans and other extensions of credit amounting to approximately $23,392,000 to certain directors, executive officers, and their related entities, of which approximately $16,858,000 had been drawn upon. The terms on these loans and extensions are on substantially the same terms customary for other persons for the type of loan involved. None of these loans to certain directors, executive officers, and their related entities, were impaired at March 31, 2007.
     During the three months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006, Pinnacle Financial sold participations in certain loans to correspondent banks at an interest rate that was less than that of the borrower’s rate of interest. In accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, Pinnacle Financial recognized a net gain on the sale of these participated loans for the three months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006 of approximately $45,000 and $73,000, respectively, which is attributable to the present value of the future net cash flows of the difference between the interest payments the borrower is projected to pay Pinnacle Financial and the amount of interest that will be owed the correspondent bank based on their participation in the loans. At March 31, 2007, Pinnacle Financial was servicing $120 million of loans for correspondent banks and other entities, of which $114 million was commercial loans.
Note 5. Income Taxes
     FASB Interpretation 48, “Accounting for Income Tax Uncertainties” (“FIN 48”) was issued in June 2006 and defines the threshold for recognizing the benefits of tax return positions in the financial statements as “more-likely-than-not” to be sustained by the taxing authority. FIN 48 also provides guidance on the derecognition, measurement and classification of income tax uncertainties, along with any related interest and penalties and includes guidance concerning accounting for income tax uncertainties in interim periods. Pinnacle Financial adopted the provisions of FASB Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes (“FIN 48”), on January 1, 2007, and determined there was no need to make an adjustment to retained earnings upon adoption of this Interpretation. As of January 1, 2007, Pinnacle Financial has $700,000 of unrecognized tax benefits related to Federal income tax matters. If ultimately recognized, this amount will reduce goodwill associated with the acquisition of Cavalry and therefore would not impact the Company’s effective tax rate. The Company does not anticipate any material increase or decrease in unrecognized tax benefits during 2007 relative to any tax positions taken prior to January 1, 2007.
     As of January 1, 2007, Pinnacle Financial has accrued no interest and no penalties related to uncertain tax positions. It is Pinnacle Financial’s policy to recognize interest and/or penalties related to income tax matters in income tax expense.
     Pinnacle Financial and its subsidiaries file a consolidated U.S. Federal income tax return. The Company is currently open to audit under the statute of limitations by the Internal Revenue Service for the years ending December 31, 2003 through 2006.

Page 12


Table of Contents

PINNACLE FINANCIAL PARTNERS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
Pinnacle Financial and its subsidiaries’ state income tax returns are open to audit under the statute of limitations for the years ended December 31, 2002 through 2006.
     Income tax expense attributable to income from continuing operations for the three months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006 consists of the following:
                 
    2007   2006
     
Current tax expense:
               
Federal
  $ 3,598,664     $ 1,474,215  
State
    306,120       110,037  
     
Total current tax expense
    3,904,784       1,584,252  
     
Deferred tax benefit:
               
Federal
    (1,903,173 )     (311,326 )
State
    (217,098 )     (46,166 )
     
Total deferred tax benefit
    (1,310,271 )     (357,492 )
     
 
  $ 2,594,513     $ 1,226,760  
     
     Pinnacle Financial’s income tax expense (benefit) differs from the amounts computed by applying the Federal income tax statutory rates of 35% in 2007 and 34% in 2006 to income before income taxes. A reconciliation of the differences for the three months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006 is as follows:
                 
    2007   2006
     
Income taxes at statutory rate
  $ 2,868,724     $ 1,305,053  
State tax expense, net of Federal tax effect
    57,864       39,998  
Federal tax credits
    (90,000 )     (75,000 )
Tax-exempt securities
    (196,607 )     (119,973 )
Other items
    (45,468 )     76,682  
     
Income tax expense
  $ 2,594,513     $ 1,226,760  
     
     The effective tax rate for 2007 and 2006 is impacted by Federal tax credits related to the New Markets Tax Credit program whereby a subsidiary of Pinnacle National has been awarded approximately $2.3 million in future Federal tax credits which are available thru 2010. Tax benefits related to these credits will be recognized for financial reporting purposes in the same periods that the credits are recognized in the Company’s income tax returns. The credit that is available for the year ended December 31, 2007 is $360,000 and for the year ended December 31, 2006 is $300,000. Pinnacle Financial believes that it will comply with the various regulatory provisions of the New Markets Tax Credit program, and therefore has reflected the impact of the credits in its estimated annual effective tax rate for 2007 and 2006.
     The components of deferred income taxes included in other assets in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets at March 31, 2007 and December 31, 2006 are as follows:

Page 13


Table of Contents

PINNACLE FINANCIAL PARTNERS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
                 
    2007   2006
     
Deferred tax assets:
               
Allowance for loan losses
  $ 6,918,726     $ 6,654,334  
Loans
    1,154,981       1,337,983  
Securities
    1,017,449       1,251,636  
Accrued liability for supplemental retirement agreements
    1,552,598       1,535,688  
Deposits
    478,668       585,568  
Other deferred tax assets
    271,361       340,296  
     
 
    11,394,168       11,705,505  
     
 
               
Deferred tax liabilities:
               
Depreciation and amortization
    349,788       1,563,078  
Core deposit intangible asset
    4,270,772       4,473,076  
FHLB dividends
    803,435       770,156  
Other deferred tax liabilities
    435,536       440,642  
     
 
    5,859,531       7,246,952  
     
Net deferred tax assets
  $ 5,534,637     $ 4,458,553  
     
     In assessing the realizability of deferred tax assets, management considers whether it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. The ultimate realization of deferred tax assets is dependent upon the generation of future taxable income during the periods in which those temporary differences become deductible. Management considers the scheduled reversal of deferred tax liabilities, projected future taxable income, and tax planning strategies in making this assessment. Based upon the level of historical taxable income and projections for future taxable income over the periods in which the deferred tax assets are deductible, management believes it is more likely than not that Pinnacle Financial will realize the benefit of these deductible differences. However, the amount of the deferred tax asset considered realizable could be reduced in the near term if estimates of future taxable income during the carryforward period are reduced.
Note 6. Commitments and Contingent Liabilities
     In the normal course of business, Pinnacle Financial has entered into off-balance sheet financial instruments which include commitments to extend credit (i.e., including unfunded lines of credit) and standby letters of credit. Commitments to extend credit are usually the result of lines of credit granted to existing borrowers under agreements that the total outstanding indebtedness will not exceed a specific amount during the term of the indebtedness. Typical borrowers are commercial concerns that use lines of credit to supplement their treasury management functions, thus their total outstanding indebtedness may fluctuate during any time period based on the seasonality of their business and the resultant timing of their cash flows. Other typical lines of credit are related to home equity loans granted to consumers. Commitments to extend credit generally have fixed expiration dates or other termination clauses and may require payment of a fee.
     Standby letters of credit are generally issued on behalf of an applicant (our customer) to a specifically named beneficiary and are the result of a particular business arrangement that exists between the applicant and the beneficiary. Standby letters of credit have fixed expiration dates and are usually for terms of two years or less unless terminated beforehand due to criteria specified in the standby letter of credit. A typical arrangement involves the applicant routinely being indebted to the beneficiary for such items as inventory purchases, insurance, utilities, lease guarantees or other third party commercial transactions. The standby letter of credit would permit the beneficiary to obtain payment from Pinnacle Financial under certain prescribed circumstances. Subsequently, Pinnacle Financial would then seek reimbursement from the applicant pursuant to the terms of the standby letter of credit.
     Pinnacle Financial follows the same credit policies and underwriting practices when making these commitments as it does for on-balance sheet instruments. Each customer’s creditworthiness is evaluated on a case-by-case basis, and the amount of collateral obtained, if any, is based on management’s credit evaluation of the customer. Collateral held varies but may include cash, real estate and improvements, marketable securities, accounts receivable, inventory, equipment, and personal property.
     The contractual amounts of these commitments are not reflected in the consolidated financial statements and would only be reflected if drawn upon. Since many of the commitments are expected to expire without being drawn upon, the contractual amounts

Page 14


Table of Contents

PINNACLE FINANCIAL PARTNERS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
do not necessarily represent future cash requirements. However, should the commitments be drawn upon and should our customers default on their resulting obligation to us, Pinnacle Financial’s maximum exposure to credit loss, without consideration of collateral, is represented by the contractual amount of those instruments.
     A summary of Pinnacle Financial’s total contractual amount for all off-balance sheet commitments at March 31, 2007 is as follows:
         
Commitments to extend credit
  $ 510,561,720  
Standby letters of credit
    54,772,369  
     At March 31, 2007, the fair value of Pinnacle Financial’s standby letters of credit was $159,000. This amount represents the unamortized fee associated with these standby letters of credit and is included in the consolidated balance sheet of Pinnacle Financial. This fair value will decrease over time as the existing standby letters of credit approach their expiration dates.
     Various legal claims also arise from time to time in the normal course of business. In the opinion of management, the resolution of claims outstanding at March 31, 2007 will not have a material effect on Pinnacle Financial’s consolidated financial statements.
Note 7. Stock Option Plan and Restricted Shares
     Pinnacle Financial has two equity incentive plans under which it has granted stock options to its employees to purchase common stock at or above the fair market value on the date of grant and granted restricted share awards to employees and directors. During the first quarter of 2006 and in connection with its merger with Cavalry, Pinnacle Financial assumed a third equity incentive plan, the 1999 Cavalry Bancorp, Inc. Stock Option Plan (the “Cavalry Plan”). All options granted under the Cavalry Plan were fully vested prior to Pinnacle Financial’s merger with Cavalry and expire at various dates between January 2011 and June 2012.
     As of March 31, 2007, of the 1,846,000 stock options outstanding, 1,238,000 of those options were granted with the intention to be incentive stock options qualifying under Section 422 of the Internal Revenue Code for favorable tax treatment to the option holder while 607,000 options would be deemed non-qualified stock options and thus not subject to favorable tax treatment to the option holder. All stock options under the plans vest in equal increments over five years from the date of grant and are exercisable over a period of ten years from the date of grant.
     A summary of the activity within the three equity incentive plans during the three months ended March 31, 2007 and information regarding expected vesting, contractual terms remaining, intrinsic values and other matters was as follows:
                                 
                    Weighted-    
                    Average    
            Weighted-   Contractual   Aggregate
            Average   Remaining   Intrinsic
            Exercise   Term   Value (1)
    Number   Price   (in years)   (000’s)
     
Outstanding at December 31, 2006
    1,658,459     $ 12.93       6.4     $ 31,848  
                     
Granted
    252,443       31.30                  
Exercised
    (58,475 )     7.31                  
Forfeited
    (6,492 )     29.47                  
                     
Outstanding at March 31, 2007
    1,845,935     $ 16.56       6.7     $ 26,277  
     
Outstanding and expected to vest as of March 31, 2007
    1,807,919     $ 16.37       6.7     $ 26,085  
     
Options exercisable at March 31, 2007
    1,009,781     $ 8.52       5.0     $ 22,209  
     
 
(1)   The aggregate intrinsic value is calculated as the difference between the exercise price of the underlying awards and the quoted price of Pinnacle Financial common stock of $30.51 per common share for the approximately 1.2 million options that were in-the-money at March 31, 2007.
     During the three months ended March 31, 2007, 142,000 option awards vested at an average exercise price of $15.15 and an intrinsic value of approximately $3.9 million.

Page 15


Table of Contents

PINNACLE FINANCIAL PARTNERS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
     During the three months ended March 31, 2007, the aggregate intrinsic value of options exercised under the equity incentive plans was $1.37 million determined as of the date of option exercise. As of March 31, 2007, there was approximately $5.46 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested stock options granted under the equity incentive plans. That cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 4.1 years.
     During the three months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006, Pinnacle Financial recorded stock-based compensation expense using the
Black-Scholes valuation model for awards granted prior to, but not yet vested, as of January 1, 2006 and for stock-based awards granted after January 1, 2006. For these awards, Pinnacle Financial has recognized compensation expense using a straight-line amortization method. Stock-based compensation expense has been reduced for estimated forfeitures. The impact on the Company’s results of operations (compensation and employee benefits expense) and earnings per share of recording stock-based compensation in accordance with SFAS No. 123(R) (related to stock option awards) for the three months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006 was as follows:
                                 
    Three months ended March 31, 2007    
    Awards granted with                
    the intention to be   Non-qualified           Three months
    classified   stock           ended March 31,
    as incentive stock options   option awards   Total   2006
     
Stock-based compensation expense
  $ 116,000     $ 246,000     $ 362,000     $ 152,000  
Deferred income tax benefit
          97,000       97,000       8,000  
     
Impact of stock-based compensation expense after deferred income tax benefit
  $ 116,000     $ 149,000     $ 265,000     $ 144,000  
     
Impact on earnings per share:
                               
Basic –weighted average shares outstanding
  $ 0.008     $ 0.010     $ 0.017     $ 0.015  
     
Fully diluted – weighted average shares outstanding
  $ 0.007     $ 0.009     $ 0.016     $ 0.013  
     
     For purposes of these calculations, the fair value of options granted for each of the three months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006 was estimated using the Black-Scholes option pricing model and the following assumptions:
                 
    2007   2006
     
Risk free interest rate
    4.78 %     4.40 %
Expected life of options
  6.5 years       6.5 years  
Expected dividend yield
    0.00 %     0.00 %
Expected volatility
    20.94 %     23.65 %
Weighted average fair value
  $ 10.79     $ 9.31  
     Pinnacle Financial’s computation of expected volatility is based on weekly historical volatility since September of 2002. Pinnacle Financial used the simplified method in determining the estimated life of stock option issuances. The risk free interest rate of the award is based on the closing market bid for U.S. Treasury securities corresponding to the expected life of the stock option issuances in effect at the time of grant.
     Additionally, Pinnacle Financial’s 2004 Equity Incentive Plan provides for the granting of restricted share awards and other performance or market-based awards, such as stock appreciation rights. There were no market-based awards or stock appreciation rights outstanding as of March 31, 2007. During the three months ended March 31, 2007, Pinnacle Financial awarded 23,196 shares, respectively, of restricted common stock to certain executives of Pinnacle Financial. Of these awards, 7,732 are considered granted for financial reporting purposes. The fair value of these awards as of the date of grant was $31.70 per share. The forfeiture restrictions on the restricted shares lapse in three separate traunches should Pinnacle Financial achieve certain earnings and soundness targets over the subsequent three year period. 15,464 of the shares awarded on March 31, 2007 are not yet deemed to be granted for financial reporting purposes because the key terms required to be achieved in order for the forfeiture restrictions to lapse the have not yet been defined.
     Compensation expense associated with all restricted share awards is recognized over the time period that the restrictions associated with the awards lapse based on a graded vesting schedule such that each year’s traunche is amortized separately. For the three months ended March 31, 2007, Pinnacle Financial recognized approximately $102,000 in compensation costs attributable to

Page 16


Table of Contents

PINNACLE FINANCIAL PARTNERS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
all awards issued prior to March 31, 2007. Accumulated compensation costs since the date these shares were awarded have amounted to approximately $750,000 through March 31, 2007.
     During 2006, the Board of Directors of Pinnacle Financial awarded 4,400 shares of restricted common stock to the outside members of the board in accordance with their 2006 board compensation package. On March 20, 2007, the Board of Directors of Pinnacle Financial awarded 3,230 shares of restricted common stock to the outside members of the board in accordance with their 2007 board compensation package. Each board member received an award of 323 shares. The restrictions on these shares are expected to lapse on January 18, 2008 if each individual board member meets his or her attendance goals for the various board and board committee meetings to which each member is scheduled to attend during the year ended December 31, 2007. The weighted average fair value of these restricted share awards granted to our directors in 2007 as of the date of grant was $32.30 per share. For the three months ended March 31, 2007, Pinnacle Financial recognized approximately $3,000, in compensation costs attributable to these awards.
     A summary of activity for restricted share awards for the three months ended March 31, 2007 follows:
                                                 
    Executive Management Awards   Board of Director Awards
(number of share awards)   Vested   Unvested   Totals   Vested   Unvested   Totals
     
Balances at December 31, 2006
    20,769       17,500       38,269             4,000       4,000  
Granted
          7,732       7,732             3,230       3,230  
Forfeited
                                   
Vested
    12,755       (12,755 )           4,000       (4,000 )      
         
Balances at March 31, 2007
    33,524       12,477       46,001       4,000       3,230       7,230  
         
     A summary of compensation expense, net of the impact of income taxes, related to restricted stock awards for the three months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006, follows:
                 
    2007   2006
     
Stock-based compensation expense
  $ 105,000     $ 34,000  
Income tax benefit
    41,000       13,000  
     
Impact of stock-based compensation expense, net of income tax benefit
  $ 64,000     $ 21,000  
     
Impact on earnings per share:
               
Basic – weighted average shares outstanding
  $ 0.004     $ 0.002  
     
Fully diluted – weighted average shares outstanding
  $ 0.004     $ 0.002  
     
Note 8. Regulatory Matters
     Pinnacle National is subject to restrictions on the payment of dividends to Pinnacle Financial under Federal banking laws and the regulations of the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency. Pinnacle Financial is also subject to limits on payment of dividends to its shareholders by the rules, regulations and policies of Federal banking authorities. Pinnacle Financial has not paid any cash dividends since inception, and it does not anticipate that it will consider paying dividends until Pinnacle National generates sufficient capital from operations to support both anticipated asset growth and dividend payments.
     Pinnacle Financial and Pinnacle National are subject to various regulatory capital requirements administered by Federal banking agencies. Failure to meet minimum capital requirements can initiate certain mandatory, and possibly additional discretionary actions, by regulators that, if undertaken, could have a direct material effect on the financial statements. Under capital adequacy guidelines and the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action, Pinnacle Financial and Pinnacle National must meet specific capital guidelines that involve quantitative measures of the assets, liabilities, and certain off-balance-sheet items as calculated under regulatory accounting practices. Pinnacle Financial’s and Pinnacle National’s capital amounts and classification are also subject to qualitative judgments by the regulators about components, risk weightings, and other factors.

Page 17


Table of Contents

PINNACLE FINANCIAL PARTNERS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
     Quantitative measures established by regulation to ensure capital adequacy require Pinnacle Financial and Pinnacle National to maintain minimum amounts and ratios of Total and Tier I capital to risk-weighted assets and of Tier I capital to average assets. Management believes, as of March 31, 2007 and December 31, 2006, that Pinnacle Financial and Pinnacle National met all capital adequacy requirements to which they are subject. To be categorized as well-capitalized, Pinnacle National must maintain minimum Total risk-based, Tier I risk-based, and Tier I leverage ratios as set forth in the following table. Pinnacle Financial and Pinnacle National’s actual capital amounts and ratios are presented in the following table (dollars in thousands):
                                                 
                                    Minimum
                                    To Be Well-Capitalized
                    Minimum   Under Prompt
                    Capital   Corrective
    Actual   Requirement   Action Provisions
    Amount   Ratio   Amount   Ratio   Amount   Ratio
     
At March 31, 2007
                                               
 
                                               
Total capital to risk weighted assets:
                                               
Pinnacle Financial
  $ 210,559       11.9 %   $ 142,162       8.0 %   not applicable
Pinnacle National
  $ 182,530       10.3 %   $ 141,864       8.0 %   $ 177,330       10.0 %
Tier I capital to risk weighted assets:
                                               
Pinnacle Financial
  $ 193,767       10.9 %   $ 71,081       4.0 %   not applicable
Pinnacle National
  $ 165,738       9.4 %   $ 70,932       4.0 %   $ 106,398       6.0 %
Tier I capital to average assets (*):
                                               
Pinnacle Financial
  $ 193,767       9.6 %   $ 81,161       4.0 %   not applicable
Pinnacle National
  $ 165,738       8.2 %   $ 81,197       4.0 %   $ 101,496       5.0 %
 
                                               
At December 31, 2006
                                               
 
                                               
Total capital to risk weighted assets:
                                               
Pinnacle Financial
  $ 202,881       11.8 %   $ 137,638       8.0 %   not applicable
Pinnacle National
  $ 175,159       10.2 %   $ 137,340       8.0 %   $ 171,676       10.0 %
Tier I capital to risk weighted assets:
                                               
Pinnacle Financial
  $ 186,763       10.9 %   $ 68,819       4.0 %   not applicable
Pinnacle National
  $ 159,031       9.3 %   $ 68,670       4.0 %   $ 103,005       6.0 %
Tier I capital to average assets (*):
                                               
Pinnacle Financial
  $ 186,763       9.5 %   $ 79,021       4.0 %   not applicable
Pinnacle National
  $ 159,031       8.1 %   $ 79,056       4.0 %   $ 98,820       5.0 %
 
(*)   Average assets for the above calculations were based on the most recent quarter.
Note 9. Business Segment Information
     Pinnacle Financial has four reporting segments comprised of commercial banking, trust and investment services, mortgage origination and insurance services. Pinnacle Financial’s primary segment is commercial banking which consists of commercial loan and deposit services as well as the activities of Pinnacle National’s branch locations. Pinnacle Financial’s segments were changed in 2006 as a result of the acquisition of Cavalry to include Trust with Investment Services segment and to add a new segment for Insurance Services. Trust and investment services include trust services offered by Pinnacle National and all brokerage and investment activities associated with Pinnacle Asset Management, an operating unit within Pinnacle National. Mortgage origination is also a separate unit within Pinnacle National and focuses on the origination of residential mortgage loans for sale to investors in the secondary residential mortgage market. Insurance Services reflect the activities of Pinnacle National’s wholly owned subsidiary, Miller and Loughry Insurance Services, Inc. Miller and Loughry is a general insurance agency located in Murfreesboro, Tennessee and is licensed to sell various commercial and consumer insurance products. The following tables present financial information for each reportable segment as of March 31, 2007 and 2006 and for the three months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006 (dollars in thousands):

Page 18


Table of Contents

PINNACLE FINANCIAL PARTNERS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
                                         
            Trust and            
    Commercial   Investment   Mortgage   Insurance   Total
    Banking   Services   Origination   Services   Company
     
For the three months ended March 31, 2007:
                                       
Net interest income
  $ 17,047     $     $ 35     $     $ 17,082  
Provision for loan losses
    788                         788  
Noninterest income
    2,648       1,114       586       643       5,026  
Noninterest expense
    11,397       800       487       440       13,124  
Income tax expense
    2,338       123       53       80       2,594  
     
Net income
  $ 5,207     $ 191     $ 81     $ 123     $ 5,602  
     
 
                                       
End of period assets
  $ 2,188,750                 $ 4,382     $ 2,193,132  
     
 
                                       
For the three months ended March 31, 2006:
                                       
Net interest income
  $ 9,504     $     $     $ 3     $ 9,507  
Provision for loan losses
    387                         387  
Noninterest income
    1,066       429       288       265       2,048  
Noninterest expense
    6,716       372       165       76       7,329  
Income tax expense
    1,083       21       47       76       1,227  
     
Net income
  $ 2,384     $ 36     $ 76     $ 116     $ 2,612  
     
 
                                       
End of period assets
  $ 1,823,662     $     $     $ 4,550     $ 1,828,212  
     
Note 10. Investments in Unconsolidated Subsidiaries and Other Entities
     On December 29, 2003, the Company established PNFP Statutory Trust I; on September 15, 2005 the Company established PNFP Statutory Trust II; and on September 7, 2006 the Company established PNFP Statutory Trust III (“Trust I”; “Trust II”; “Trust III” or collectively, the “Trusts”). All are wholly-owned statutory business trusts. Pinnacle Financial is the sole sponsor of the Trusts and acquired each Trust’s common securities for $310,000; $619,000 and $619,000, respectively. The Trusts were created for the exclusive purpose of issuing 30-year capital trust preferred securities (“Trust Preferred Securities”) in the aggregate amount of $10,000,000 for Trust I; $20,000,000 for Trust II and $20,000,000 for Trust III and using the proceeds to acquire junior subordinated debentures (“Subordinated Debentures”) issued by Pinnacle Financial. The sole assets of the Trusts are the Subordinated Debentures. Pinnacle Financial’s aggregate $1,548,000 investment in the Trusts is included in investments in unconsolidated subsidiaries and other entities in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet at March 31, 2007 and the $51,548,000 obligation of Pinnacle Financial is reflected as subordinated debt at March 31, 2007.
     The Trust I Preferred Securities bear a floating interest rate based on a spread over 3-month LIBOR (8.15% at March 31, 2007) which is set each quarter and mature on December 30, 2033. The Trust II Preferred Securities bear a fixed interest rate of 5.848% per annum thru September 30, 2010 after which time the securities will bear a floating rate set each quarter based on a spread over 3-month LIBOR. The Trust II securities mature on September 30, 2035. The Trust III Preferred Securities bear a floating interest rate based on a spread over 3-month LIBOR (7.00% at March 31, 2007) which is set each quarter and mature on September 30, 2036.
     Distributions are payable quarterly. The Trust Preferred Securities are subject to mandatory redemption upon repayment of the Subordinated Debentures at their stated maturity date or their earlier redemption in an amount equal to their liquidation amount plus accumulated and unpaid distributions to the date of redemption. Pinnacle Financial guarantees the payment of distributions and payments for redemption or liquidation of the Trust Preferred Securities to the extent of funds held by the Trusts. Pinnacle Financial’s obligations under the Subordinated Debentures together with the guarantee and other back-up obligations, in the aggregate, constitute a full and unconditional guarantee by Pinnacle Financial of the obligations of the Trusts under the Trust Preferred Securities.
     The Subordinated Debentures are unsecured; bear interest at a rate equal to the rates paid by the Trusts on the Trust Preferred Securities and mature on the same dates as those noted above for the Trust Preferred Securities. Interest is payable quarterly. Pinnacle Financial may defer the payment of interest at any time for a period not exceeding 20 consecutive quarters provided that the deferral period does not extend past the stated maturity. During any such deferral period, distributions on the Trust Preferred Securities will also be deferred and Pinnacle Financial’s ability to pay dividends on our common shares will be restricted.

Page 19


Table of Contents

PINNACLE FINANCIAL PARTNERS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
     Subject to approval by the Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta, the Trust Preferred Securities may be redeemed prior to maturity at the Company’s option on or after September 17, 2008 for Trust I; on or after September 30, 2010 for Trust II and September 30, 2011 for Trust III. The Trust Preferred Securities may also be redeemed at any time in whole (but not in part) in the event of unfavorable changes in laws or regulations that result in (1) the Trust becoming subject to Federal income tax on income received on the Subordinated Debentures, (2) interest payable by the parent company on the Subordinated Debentures becoming nondeductible for Federal tax purposes, (3) the requirement for the Trust to register under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended, or (4) loss of the ability to treat the Trust Preferred Securities as “Tier I capital” under the Federal Reserve capital adequacy guidelines.
     The Trust Preferred Securities for the Trusts qualify as Tier I capital under current regulatory definitions subject to certain limitations. Debt issuance costs associated with Trust I of $105,000 consisting primarily of underwriting discounts and professional fees are included in other assets in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet. These debt issuance costs are being amortized over ten years using the straight-line method. There were no debt issuance costs associated with Trust II or Trust III.
     Combined summary financial information for the Trusts follows (dollars in thousands) at March 31, 2007 and December 31, 2006 and for the three months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006:
Combined Summary Balance Sheets
                 
    March 31, 2007     December 31, 2006  
     
Asset – Investment in subordinated debentures issued by Pinnacle Financial
  $ 51,548     $ 51,548  
 
               
Liabilities
  $     $  
 
               
Stockholder’s equity – Trust preferred securities
    50,000       50,000  
Common securities (100% owned by Pinnacle Financial)
    1,548       1,548  
     
Total stockholder’s equity
    51,548       51,548  
     
Total liabilities and stockholder’s equity
  $ 51,548     $ 51,548  
     
Combined Summary Income Statement
                 
    Three months ended March 31,
    2007   2006
     
Income – Interest income from subordinated debentures issued by Pinnacle Financial
  $ 876     $ 485  
     
Net Income
  $ 876     $ 485  
     
Combined Summary Statement of Stockholder’s Equity
                                 
    Trust     Total              
    Preferred     Common     Retained     Stockholder’s  
    Securities     Stock     Earnings     Equity  
     
Balances, December 31, 2005
  $ 30,000     $ 929     $     $ 30,929  
Net income
                485       485  
Dividends:
                               
Trust preferred securities
                (470 )     (470 )
Common paid to Pinnacle Financial
                (15 )     (15 )
     
Balances, March 31, 2006
  $ 30,000     $ 929     $     $ 30,929  
     
 
                               
Balances, December 31, 2006
  $ 50,000     $ 1,548     $     $ 51,548  
Net income
                876       876  
Issuance of trust preferred securities Dividends:
                               
Trust preferred securities
                (861 )     (861 )
Common paid to Pinnacle Financial
                (15 )     (15 )
     
Balances, March 31, 2007
  $ 50,000     $ 1,548     $     $ 51,548  
     

Page 20


Table of Contents

PINNACLE FINANCIAL PARTNERS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
     In addition, the Company has investments in other entities which totaled approximately $784,000 and $66,000 at March 31, 2007 and December 31, 2006, respectively. These investments are reported at fair value.

Page 21


Table of Contents

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The following is a discussion of our financial condition at March 31, 2007 and December 31, 2006 and our results of operations for the three months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006. The purpose of this discussion is to focus on information about our financial condition and results of operations which is not otherwise apparent from the consolidated financial statements. The following discussion and analysis should be read along with our consolidated financial statements and the related notes included elsewhere herein.
Overview
General. Our rapid growth from inception through the first quarter of 2007 has had a material impact on our financial condition and results of operations. This rapid growth resulted in net income for the three months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006 of $0.34 and $0.24, respectively. At March 31, 2007, loans totaled $1.554 billion, as compared to $1.498 billion at December 31, 2006, while total deposits increased to $1.700 billion at March 31, 2007 compared to $1.622 billion at December 31, 2006.
Acquisition. On March 15, 2006, we consummated our merger with Cavalry. Pursuant to the merger agreement, we acquired all Cavalry common stock via a tax-free exchange whereby Cavalry shareholders received a fixed exchange ratio of 0.95 shares of our common stock for each share of Cavalry common stock, or approximately 6.9 million Pinnacle Financial shares. The financial information herein includes the activities of the former Cavalry (the “Rutherford County market”) since March 15, 2006.
In accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 141, “Accounting for Business Combinations” (“SFAS No. 141”), SFAS No. 142, “Goodwill and Intangible Assets” (“SFAS No. 142”) and SFAS No. 147, “Acquisition of Certain Financial Institutions” (“SFAS No. 147”), we recorded at fair value the following assets and liabilities of Cavalry as of March 15, 2006 (dollars in thousands):
         
Cash and cash equivalents
  $ 37,420  
Investment securities – available-for-sale
    39,476  
Loans, net of an allowance for loan losses of $5,102
    545,598  
Goodwill
    114,288  
Core deposit intangible
    13,168  
Other assets
    42,937  
 
     
Total assets acquired
    792,887  
 
     
         
Deposits
    583,992  
Federal Home Loan Bank advances
    17,767  
Other liabilities
    18,851  
 
     
Total liabilities assumed
    620,610  
 
     
Total consideration paid for Cavalry
  $ 172,277  
 
     
As noted above, total consideration for Cavalry approximates $172.3 million of which $171.1 million was in the form of our common shares and options to acquire our common shares and $1.2 million in investment banking fees, attorney’s fees and other costs related to the purchase of Cavalry. We issued 6,856,298 shares of our common stock to the former Cavalry shareholders. In accordance with EITF 99-12, “Determination of the Measurement Date for the Market Price of Acquirer Securities Issued in a Purchase Business Combination,” the shares were valued at $24.53 per common share which represents the average closing price of our common stock from the two days prior to the merger announcement on September 30, 2005 through the two days after the merger announcement. Aggregate consideration for the common stock issued was approximately $168.2 million. Additionally, we also have assumed the Cavalry Bancorp, Inc. 1999 Stock Incentive Plan (the “Cavalry Plan”) pursuant to which we were obligated to issue 195,551 shares of our common stock upon exercise of stock options awarded to certain former Cavalry employees who held outstanding options as of March 15, 2006. All of these options were fully vested prior to the merger announcement date and expire at various dates between 2011 and 2012. The exercise prices for these stock options range between $10.26 per share and $13.68 per share. In accordance with SFAS No. 141, we considered the fair value of these options in determining the acquisition cost of Cavalry. The fair value of these vested options approximated $2.9 million which has been included as a component of the aggregate purchase price.

Page 22


Table of Contents

In accordance with SFAS Nos. 141 and 142, we recognized $13.2 million as a core deposit intangible in connection with our merger with Cavalry. This identified intangible is being amortized over seven years using an accelerated method which anticipates the life of the underlying deposits to which the intangible is attributable. For the three months ended March 31, 2007, approximately $516,000 of amortization was recognized in the statement of income. Amortization expense associated with the core deposit intangible will approximate $1.8 million to $2.1 million per year for the next four years with lesser amounts for the remaining two years.
We also recorded other adjustments to the carrying value of Cavalry’s assets and liabilities in order to reflect the fair value of those net assets in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, including a $4.8 million discount associated with the loan portfolio, a $2.9 million premium for Cavalry’s certificates of deposit and a $4.6 million premium for Cavalry’s land and buildings. We have also recorded the corresponding deferred tax assets or liabilities associated with these adjustments. The discounts and premiums related to financial assets and liabilities will be amortized into our statements of income in future periods using a method that approximates the level yield method over the anticipated lives of the underlying financial assets or liabilities. For the three months ended March 31, 2007, the accretion of the fair value discounts related to the acquired loans and certificates of deposit increased net interest income by approximately $833,000 compared to $431,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2006. Based on the estimated useful lives of the acquired loans and deposits, we expect to recognize increases in net interest income related to accretion of these purchase accounting adjustments of $3.2 million in subsequent years.
We also incurred approximately $443,000 in merger related expenses during the three months ended March 31, 2006 directly related to the Cavalry merger. These charges were for our integration of Cavalry and accelerated depreciation and amortization related to software and other technology assets whose useful lives were shortened as a result of the Cavalry acquisition. We do not anticipate any merger related expenses associated with the Cavalry merger in 2007.
Knoxville, Tennessee Expansion. On April 9, 2007, we announced our plans to expand to the Knoxville, Tennessee, market and the hiring of two prominent veteran bankers to lead our firm in Knoxville. We have estimated that our expansion into Knoxville will result in a reduction in our net income for 2007 as we hire new associates in that market and build out our initial branch network. Our current estimates are that Knoxville will negatively impact our diluted earnings per share by $0.08 in 2007.
Results of Operations. Our net interest income increased to $17.1 million for the first three months of 2007 compared to $9.5 million for first three months of 2006. The net interest margin (the ratio of net interest income to average earning assets) for the three months ended March 31, 2007 was 3.64% compared to 3.65% for the same period in 2006.
Our provision for loan losses was $788,000 for the first three months of 2007 compared to $387,000 for the same period in 2006. The provision for loan losses increased primarily due to increases in loan volumes and charge-offs in 2007 compared to 2006.
Noninterest income for the three months ended March 31, 2007 compared to the same period in 2006 increased by $3.0 million, or 145%. This increase is largely attributable to the fee businesses associated with the Cavalry acquisition, particularly with regard to service charges on deposit accounts, insurance sales commissions and trust fees.
Our continued growth during the first three months of 2007 resulted in increased noninterest expense compared to the first three months of 2006 due to the addition of the Rutherford County market, increases in salaries and employee benefits, equipment and occupancy expenses and other operating expenses. The number of full-time equivalent employees increased from 368.0 at March 31, 2006 to 419.5 at March 31, 2007. We expect to add additional employees throughout 2007 which will cause our compensation and employee benefit expense to increase in 2007. Additionally, our branch expansion efforts and our recently announced expansion into the Knoxville, Tennessee market will result in increased operating expenses in the future.
Our efficiency ratio (the ratio of noninterest expense to the sum of net interest income and noninterest income) was 59.4% for the first three months of 2007 compared to 63.4% for the same period in 2006.
The effective income tax expense rate for the three months ended March 31, 2007 was approximately 31.6% compared to an effective income tax expense rate for the three months ended March 31, 2006 of approximately 32.0%. The slight decrease in the effective tax rate between the two periods was due to increased bank owned life insurance acquired with the Cavalry acquisition and other tax initiatives.

Page 23


Table of Contents

Net income for the first three months of 2007 was $5.6 million compared to $2.6 million for the same period in 2006, an increase of 114%.
Financial Condition. Loans increased $56.2 million during the first three months of 2007. As we seek to increase our loan portfolio, we must also continue to monitor the risks inherent in our lending operations. If our allowance for loan losses is not sufficient to cover the estimated loan losses in our loan portfolio, increases to the allowance for loan losses would be required which would decrease our earnings.
We have successfully grown our total deposits to $1.700 billion at March 31, 2007 compared to $1.622 billion at December 31, 2006, an increase of $77.7 million. This growth in deposits had a higher funding cost due to rising rates and increased deposit pricing competition in 2007 compared to 2006. We typically adjust our loan yields at a faster rate than we adjust our deposit rates. As such, unless competitive pressures dictate, our deposit funding costs do not usually adjust as quickly as do revenues from interest income on floating rate earning assets.
Capital and Liquidity. At March 31, 2007, our capital ratios, including our bank’s capital ratios, met regulatory minimum capital requirements. Additionally, at March 31, 2007, our bank would be considered to be “well-capitalized” pursuant to banking regulations. As our bank grows it will require additional capital from us over that which can be earned through operations. We anticipate that we will continue to use various capital raising techniques in order to support the growth of our bank.
In the past, we have been successful in procuring additional capital from the capital markets (via public and private offerings of trust preferred securities and common stock). This additional capital was required to support our growth. As of March 31, 2007, we believe we have sufficient capital to support our current growth plans, including our expansion into the Knoxville market. However, expansion by acquisition of other banks or by branching into a new geographic market could result in issuance of additional capital, including additional common shares.
We continue to believe there is broad acceptance of our business model and in our target markets of small to mid-sized businesses and affluent clients, real estate professionals and consumers that desire a deep relationship with their bank.
Critical Accounting Estimates
The accounting principles we follow and our methods of applying these principles conform with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles and with general practices within the banking industry. In connection with the application of those principles, we have made judgments and estimates which, in the case of the determination of our allowance for loan losses, the application of SFAS No. 123 (revised 2004), “Share Based Payments” (“SFAS No. 123(R)”) and the assessment of impairment of the intangibles resulting from the Cavalry merger have been critical to the determination of our financial position and results of operations.
Allowance for Loan Losses (“allowance”). Our management assesses the adequacy of the allowance prior to the end of each calendar quarter. This assessment includes procedures to estimate the allowance and test the adequacy and appropriateness of the resulting balance. The level of the allowance is based upon management’s evaluation of the loan portfolios, past loan loss experience, known and inherent risks in the portfolio, adverse situations that may affect the borrower’s ability to repay (including the timing of future payment), the estimated value of any underlying collateral, composition of the loan portfolio, economic conditions, industry and peer bank loan quality indications and other pertinent factors. This evaluation is inherently subjective as it requires material estimates including the amounts and timing of future cash flows expected to be received on impaired loans that may be susceptible to significant change. Loan losses are charged off when management believes that the full collectability of the loan is unlikely. A loan may be partially charged-off after a “confirming event” has occurred which serves to validate that full repayment pursuant to the terms of the loan is unlikely. Allocation of the allowance may be made for specific loans, but the entire allowance is available for any loan that, in management’s judgment, is deemed to be uncollectible.
Larger balance commercial and commercial real estate loans are impaired when, based on current information and events, it is probable that we will be unable to collect all amounts due according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement. Collection of all amounts due according to the contractual terms means that both the contractual interest payments and the contractual principal payments of a loan will be collected as scheduled in the loan agreement.

Page 24


Table of Contents

An impairment loss is recognized if the present value of expected future cash flows from the loan is less than the recorded investment in the loan (recorded investment in the loan is the principal balance plus any accrued interest, net deferred loan fees or costs and unamortized premium or discount, and does not reflect any direct write-down of the investment). The impairment loss is recognized through the allowance. Loans that are impaired are recorded at the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate, or if the loan is collateral dependent, impairment measurement is based on the fair value of the collateral, less estimated disposal costs. Income is recognized on impaired loans on a cash basis.
The level of allowance maintained is believed by management to be adequate to absorb losses inherent in the portfolio at the balance sheet date. The allowance is increased by provisions charged to expense and decreased by charge-offs, net of recoveries of amounts previously charged-off.
In assessing the adequacy of the consolidated allowance, we also consider the results of our ongoing independent loan review process. We undertake this process both to ascertain whether there are loans in the portfolio whose credit quality has weakened over time and to assist in our overall evaluation of the risk characteristics of the entire loan portfolio. Our loan review process includes the judgment of management, the input from our independent loan reviewer, and reviews that may have been conducted by bank regulatory agencies as part of their usual examination process. We incorporate loan review results in the determination of whether or not it is probable that we will be able to collect all amounts due according to the contractual terms of a loan.
As part of management’s quarterly assessment of the allowance, management divides the loan portfolio into four segments: commercial, commercial real estate, consumer and consumer real estate. Each segment is then analyzed such that an allocation of the allowance is estimated for each loan segment.
The allowance allocation for commercial and commercial real estate loans begins with a process of estimating the probable losses inherent for these types of loans. The estimates for these loans are established by category and based on our internal system of credit risk ratings and historical loss data for industry and various peer bank groups. The estimated loan loss allocation rate for our internal system of credit risk grades for commercial and commercial real estate is based on management’s experience with similarly graded loans, discussions with banking regulators and our internal loan review processes. We then weight the allocation methodologies for the commercial and commercial real estate portfolios and determine a weighted average allocation for these portfolios.
The allowance allocation for consumer and consumer real estate loans which includes installment, home equity, consumer mortgages, automobiles and others is established for each of the categories by estimating losses inherent in that particular category of consumer and consumer real estate loans. The estimated loan loss allocation rate for each category is based on management’s experience. Additionally, consumer and consumer real estate loans are analyzed based on our actual loss rates, industry loss rates and loss rates of various peer bank groups. Consumer and consumer real estate loans are evaluated as a group by category (i.e. retail real estate, installment, etc.) rather than on an individual loan basis because these loans are smaller and homogeneous. We weight the allocation methodologies for the consumer and consumer real estate portfolios and determine a weighted average allocation for these portfolios.
The estimated loan loss allocation for all four loan portfolio segments is then adjusted for management’s estimate of probable losses for several “environmental” factors. The allocation for environmental factors is particularly subjective and does not lend itself to exact mathematical calculation. This amount represents estimated inherent credit losses which may exist, but have not yet been identified, as of the balance sheet date based upon quarterly trend assessments in delinquent and nonaccrual loans, unanticipated charge-offs, credit concentration changes, prevailing economic conditions, changes in lending personnel experience, changes in lending policies or procedures and other influencing factors. These environmental factors are considered for each of the four loan segments and the allowance allocation as determined by the processes noted above for each segment is increased or decreased based on the incremental assessment of these various “environmental” factors.
We then test the resulting allowance balance by comparing the balance in the allowance to historical trends and industry and peer information. Our management then evaluates the result of the procedures performed, including the result of our testing, and concludes on the appropriateness of the balance of the allowance in its entirety. The audit committee of our board of directors reviews the assessment prior to the filing of quarterly and annual financial information.
For the quarters ended March 31, 2006 and June 30, 2006, we assessed the allowance in two separate processes using methodologies for both the Pinnacle portfolios as the portfolios existed prior to the merger with Cavalry (the “Nashville market”)

Page 25


Table of Contents

and the Rutherford County portfolio. Our methodology for the first two quarters of 2006 was consistent with the past methodologies of Pinnacle Financial and Cavalry on a stand-alone basis. In view of the acquisition, we evaluated the respective assessment methodologies and made certain changes as noted above and implemented such changes during the third quarter of 2006. The revised assessment methodology did not significantly impact our recorded allowance for loan losses.
Share Based Payments – Our stock compensation is subject to financial accounting standards that required us to assess numerous factors including the historical volatility of our stock price, anticipated option forfeitures and estimates concerning the length of time that our options would remain unexercised. Many of these assessments impact the fair value of the underlying stock option more significantly than others and changes to these assessments in future periods could be significant. We believe the assumptions we have incorporated into our stock option fair value assessments are reasonable.
Impairment of Intangible Assets — Long-lived assets, including purchased intangible assets subject to amortization, such as our core deposit intangible asset, are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. Recoverability of assets to be held and used is measured by a comparison of the carrying amount of an asset to estimated undiscounted future cash flows expected to be generated by the asset. If the carrying amount of an asset exceeds its estimated future cash flows, an impairment charge is recognized by the amount by which the carrying amount of the asset exceeds the fair value of the asset. Assets to be disposed of would be separately presented in the balance sheet and reported at the lower of the carrying amount or fair value less costs to sell, and are no longer depreciated.
Goodwill and intangible assets that have indefinite useful lives are tested annually for impairment, and are tested for impairment more frequently if events and circumstances indicate that the asset might be impaired. An impairment loss is recognized to the extent that the carrying amount exceeds the asset’s fair value. Our annual assessment date is September 30. Should we determine in a future period that the goodwill recorded in connection with our acquisition of Cavalry has been impaired, then a charge to our earnings will be recorded in the period such determination is made.

Page 26


Table of Contents

Results of Operations
Our results for the three months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006 were highlighted by the continued growth in loans and other earning assets and deposits, which resulted in increased revenues and expenses. The following is a summary of our results of operations (dollars in thousands):
                         
    Three months ended   2007-2006
    March 31,   Percent
    2007   2006   Increase
Interest income
  $ 33,739     $ 16,811       100.7 %
Interest expense
    16,657       7,304       128.1 %
     
Net interest income
    17,082       9,507       79.7 %
Provision for loan losses
    788       387       103.6 %
     
Net interest income after provision for loan losses
    16,294       9,120       78.7 %
Noninterest income
    5,026       2,048       145.4 %
Noninterest expense
    13,124       7,329       79.1 %
     
Net income before income taxes
    8,196       3,839       113.5 %
Income tax expense
    2,594       1,227       111.4 %
     
Net income
  $ 5,602     $ 2,612       114.5 %
     
Net Interest Income. Net interest income represents the amount by which interest earned on various earning assets exceeds interest paid on deposits and other interest bearing liabilities and is the most significant component of our earnings. For the three months ended March 31, 2007, we recorded net interest income of $17.1 million, which resulted in a net interest margin of 3.64%. For the three months ended March 31, 2006, we recorded net interest income of $9.5 million, which resulted in a net interest margin of 3.65%.
The following table sets forth the amount of our average balances, interest income or interest expense for each category of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities and the average interest rate for total interest-earning assets and total interest-bearing liabilities, net interest spread and net interest margin for the three months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006 (dollars in thousands):

Page 27


Table of Contents

                                                 
    Three months ended     Three months ended  
(dollars in thousands)   March 31, 2007     March 31, 2006  
    Average             Rates/     Average             Rates/  
    Balances     Interest     Yields     Balances     Interest     Yields  
     
Interest-earning assets:
                                               
Loans
  $ 1,530,771     $ 28,977       7.68 %   $ 761,326     $ 13,179       7.02 %
Securities:
                                               
Taxable
    272,669       3,346       4.98 %     241,750       2,861       4.80 %
Tax-exempt (1)
    72,961       670       4.91 %     44,571       401       4.81 %
Federal funds sold and other
    55,897       746       5.42 %     27,238       370       5.53 %
     
Total interest-earning assets
    1,932,298       33,739       7.13 %     1,074,885       16,811       6.39 %
                         
Nonearning assets
    217,630                       78,938                  
 
                                           
Total assets
  $ 2,149,928                     $ 1,153,823                  
 
                                           
 
                                               
Interest-bearing liabilities:
                                               
Interest bearing deposits
                                               
Interest checking
  $ 244,680     $ 1,957       3.24 %   $ 104,123     $ 481       1.88 %
Savings and money market
    495,877       4,125       3.37 %     344,852       2,350       2.76 %
Certificates of deposit
    624,092       7,456       4.84 %     314,992       3,019       3.89 %
     
Total interest bearing deposits
    1,364,649       13,538       4.02 %     763,967       5,850       3.11 %
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase
    157,180       1,712       4.42 %     59,723       508       3.46 %
Federal Home Loan Bank advances and other borrowings
    40,241       531       5.36 %     46,711       460       3.99 %
Subordinated debt
    51,548       876       6.89 %     30,929       486       6.36 %
     
Total interest-bearing liabilities
    1,613,618       16,657       4.19 %     901,330       7,304       3.29 %
Noninterest-bearing deposits
    269,864                   152,247              
     
Total deposits and interest-bearing liabilities
    1,883,482       16,657       3.59 %     1,053,577       7,304       2.81 %
                         
Other liabilities
    6,980                       4,711                  
Stockholders’ equity
    259,466                       95,535                  
 
                                           
 
  $ 2,149,928                     $ 1,153,823                  
 
                                           
 
                                               
Net interest income
          $ 17,082                     $ 9,507          
 
                                           
Net interest spread (2)
                    2.95 %                     3.10 %
Net interest margin (3)
                    3.64 %                     3.65 %
 
(1)   Yields computed on tax-exempt instruments on a tax equivalent basis.
 
(2)   Yields realized on interest-earning assets less the rates paid on interest-bearing liabilities.
 
(3)   Net interest margin is the result of annualized net interest income calculated on a tax-equivalent basis divided by average interest-earning assets for the period.

Page 28


Table of Contents

As noted above, the net interest margin for the three months ended March 31, 2007 was 3.64% compared to a net interest margin o f 3.65% for the same period in 2006. The net change in the net interest margin was relatively minor because the net increases in the yield on interest-earning assets between the two periods approximated the increases in the rate paid on deposits and interest-bearing liabilities. Other matters related to the changes in net interest income, net interest yields and rates, and net interest margin are presented below:
    Our loan yields increased between 2007 and 2006 by 66 basis points. The pricing of a large portion of our loan portfolio is tied to our prime rate. Our weighted average prime rate for 2007 was 8.25% compared to 7.42% in 2006. The rates were higher in 2007 and 2006 due to periodic increases in our prime lending rate which moves in concert with the Federal Reserve’s changes to its Federal funds rate.
 
    We have been able to grow our funding base significantly. For asset/liability management purposes in 2007 and 2006, we elected to allocate a greater proportion of such funds to our loan portfolio versus our securities and shorter-term investment portfolio. For 2007, average loan balances were 71.2% of total assets compared to 66.0% in 2006. Loans generally have higher yields than do securities and other shorter-term investments. This change in allocation contributed to the increase in the overall total interest earning asset yields between the two periods.
 
    During 2007, overall deposit rates were higher than those rates for the comparable period in 2006. Changes in interest rates paid on such products as interest checking, savings and money market accounts, securities sold under agreements to repurchase and Federal funds purchased will generally increase or decrease in a manner that is consistent with changes in the short-term rate environment. During 2007, as was the case with our prime lending rate, short-term rates were higher than in 2006. We also monitor the pricing of similar products by our primary competitors. The changes in the short-term rate environment and the pricing of our primary competitors required us to increase these rates in 2007 compared to the previous periods which resulted in increased rates paid on interest bearing liabilities.
 
    During 2007, the average balances of noninterest bearing deposit balances, interest bearing transaction accounts, savings and money market accounts and securities sold under agreements to repurchase amounted to 62.0% of our total funding compared to 62.7% in 2006. These funding sources generally have lower rates than do other funding sources, such as certificates of deposit and other borrowings and, as a result, these matters contributed to the decrease in our net interest spread in 2007 compared to 2006.
 
    Also impacting the net interest margin during 2007 compared to 2006 was pricing of our floating rate subordinated indebtedness which comprises approximately $31 million of the $52 million of subordinated indebtedness as of March 31, 2007. The interest rate charged on this indebtedness is generally higher than other funding sources. The rate charged on the floating rate portion of the indebtedness is determined in relation to the three-month LIBOR index and reprices quarterly. During 2007, the short-term interest rate environment was higher than previous years, and, as a result, the pricing for this funding source was higher in 2007.
There continues to be speculation in the marketplace as to the direction of interest rates and whether the Federal Reserve will increase or decrease the Federal funds target rate from the current 5.25%. As to intermediate and long-term rates, many economists are forecasting that these rates should increase over the next several quarters such that the “yield curve” approaches a more traditional position, however these forecasts are always accompanied by many qualifiers. As a result, we are forecasting in our modeling that interest rates will remain stable over the next few quarters.
The current inverted shape of the yield curve represents a challenge for most banks, including Pinnacle. However, we believe we will increase net interest income through growth in earning assets with continued emphasis on floating rate lending. The additional revenues provided by increased floating rate loans may not be sufficient to overcome any immediate increases in funding costs such that we are unable to maintain our current net interest margin. As a result, even though our net interest income will likely increase, our net interest margins could decrease due to new deposits being obtained at current market rates which are higher than our current average cost of funding and the continued competitive deposit pricing in our market area. We believe our net interest margin for the remainder of 2007 should be within a range of 3.60% to 3.70%, compared to 3.64% for the first quarter of 2007.
Provision for Loan Losses. The provision for loan losses represents a charge to earnings necessary to establish an allowance for loan losses that, in our management’s evaluation, should be adequate to provide coverage for the inherent losses on outstanding

Page 29


Table of Contents

loans. The provision for loan losses amounted to $788,000 and $387,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively.
Based upon our management’s evaluation of the loan portfolio, we believe the allowance for loan losses to be adequate to absorb our estimate of probable losses existing in the loan portfolio at March 31, 2007. An increase in gross charge-offs and an increase in loan volumes were the primary causes for the increase in our provision for loan losses in 2007 when compared to 2006.
Based upon management’s assessment of the loan portfolio, we adjust our allowance for loan losses to an amount deemed appropriate to adequately cover inherent risks in the loan portfolio. While our policies and procedures used to estimate the allowance for loan losses, as well as the resultant provision for loan losses charged to operations, are considered adequate by our management and are reviewed from time to time by our regulators, they are necessarily approximate and imprecise. There exist factors beyond our control, such as general economic conditions both locally and nationally, which may negatively impact, materially, the adequacy of our allowance for loan losses and, thus, the resulting provision for loan losses.
Noninterest Income. Our noninterest income is composed of several components, some of which vary significantly between quarterly periods. Service charges on deposit accounts and other noninterest income generally reflect our growth, while investment services and fees from the origination of mortgage loans will often reflect market conditions and fluctuate from period to period. The opportunities for recognition of gains on loans and loan participations sold and gains on sales of investment securities ma y also vary widely from quarter to quarter and year to year.
The following is the makeup of our noninterest income for the three months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006 (dollars in thousands):
                         
    Three months ended   2007-2006
    March 31,   Percent
    2007   2006   Increase (decrease)
     
Noninterest income:
                       
Service charges on deposit accounts
  $ 1,797     $ 438       310.3 %
Investment services
    735       514       43.0 %
Gains on sales of loans and loan participations, net:
                       
Fees from the origination and sale of mortgage loans, net of sales commissions
    318       250       27.2 %
Gains on loans and loan participations sold, net
    45       74       (39.2 )%
Insurance sales commissions
    637       265       140.4 %
Trust fees
    420       52       707.7 %
Other noninterest income:
                       
Letters of credit fees
    60       133       (54.9 )%
Bank-owned life insurance
    138       37       273.0 %
ATM, check card and merchant card fees
    519       6       8550 %
Other noninterest income
    357       279       43.0 %
     
Total noninterest income
  $ 5,026     $ 2,048       145.4 %
     
Service charge income for 2007 increased over that of 2006 due to increased volumes from our Rutherford County market and an increase in the number of Nashville deposit accounts subject to service charges. However, for the Nashville accounts, the increase in service charges in 2007 when compared to 2006 was offset by the earnings credit rate provided by Pinnacle National to its commercial deposit customers. This earnings credit rate serves to reduce the deposit service charges for our commercial customers and is based on the average balances of their checking accounts at Pinnacle National. We increased the number of customers subject to overdraft protection and we increased our per item insufficient fund charge by approximately 12%, which also contributed to the increase in service charge revenue in 2007.
Also included in noninterest income are commissions and fees from our financial advisory unit, Pinnacle Asset Management, a division of Pinnacle National. At March 31, 2007, Pinnacle Asset Management was receiving commissions and fees in connection with approximately $617 million in brokerage assets held with Raymond James Financial Services, Inc. compared to $597 million at December 31, 2006. Additionally, following our merger with Cavalry, we now offer trust services through Pinnacle National’s trust division. At March 31, 2007, our trust department was receiving fees on approximately $400 million in assets compared to $395 million at December 31, 2006. Also, following our merger with Cavalry, we offer insurance services through Miller and Loughry Insurance and Services, Inc. In the first quarter of 2007, we earned $637,000 for insurance commissions compared to $265,000 for the period March 15, 2006 through March 31, 2006.

Page 30


Table of Contents

Additionally, mortgage related fees for the first quarter also provided for a significant portion of the increase in noninterest income between 2007 and 2006. These mortgage fees are for loans originated in both the Nashville and Rutherford County markets that are subsequently sold to third-party investors. All of these loan sales transfer servicing rights to the buyer. Generally, mortgage origination fees increase in lower interest rate environments and decrease in rising interest rate environments. As a result, mortgage origination fees may fluctuate greatly in response to a changing rate environment.
We also sell certain commercial loan participations to our correspondent banks. Such sales are primarily related to new lending transactions in excess of internal loan limits or industry concentration limits. At March 31, 2007 and pursuant to participation agreements with these correspondents, we had participated approximately $114.1 million of originated loans to these other banks compared to $95.4 million at December 31, 2006. These participation agreements have various provisions regarding collateral position, pricing and other matters. Many of these agreements provide that we pay the correspondent less than the loan’s contracted interest rate. Pursuant to SFAS No. 140, Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets and Extinguishments of Liabilities — a replacement of FASB Statement No. 125,” in those transactions whereby the correspondent is receiving a lesser amount of interest than the amount owed by the customer, we record a net gain along with a corresponding asset representing the present value of our net retained cash flows. The resulting asset is amortized over the term of the loan. Conversely, should a loan be paid prior to maturity, any remaining unamortized asset is charged as a reduction to gains on loan participations sold. We recorded gains, net of amortization expense related to the aforementioned retained cash flow asset, of $45,000 and $74,000 during the three months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively, related to the loan participation transactions. We intend to maintain relationships with our correspondents in order to sell participations in future loans to these or other correspondents primarily due to limitations on loans to a single borrower or industry concentrations. In general, the Cavalry merger has resulted in an increase in capital which has resulted in increased lending limits for such items as loans to a single borrower and loans to a single industry such that our need to participate such loans in the future may be reduced. In any event, the timing of participations may cause the level of gains, if any, to vary significantly.
Included in other noninterest income are miscellaneous consumer fees, such as ATM revenues, merchant card and other electronic banking revenues. We experienced a significant increase in these revenues in 2007 compared to 2006 due primarily to the merger with Cavalry.
Additionally, noninterest income from the cash surrender value of bank-owned life insurance increased significantly between 2007 and 2006. In connection with the Cavalry merger, we became the owner and beneficiary of several life insurance policies on former Cavalry executives. These policies were acquired by Cavalry in connection with a supplemental retirement plan for these former Cavalry executives.
Additional other noninterest income increased by approximately $78,000 during 2007 when compared to 2006. Most of these revenues are for loan late charges and other fees.
Noninterest Expense. Noninterest expense consists of salaries and employee benefits, equipment and occupancy expenses, and other operating expenses. The following is the makeup of our noninterest expense for the three months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006 (dollars in thousands):

Page 31


Table of Contents

                         
    Three months ended   2007-2006
    March 31,   Percent
    2007   2006   Increase (decrease)
     
Noninterest expense:
                       
Salaries and employee benefits:
                       
Salaries
  $ 5,507     $ 2,614       110.7 %
Commissions
    391       234       67.1 %
Other compensation, primarily incentives
    1,022       669       52.8 %
Employee benefits and other
    1,347       931       44.7 %
     
Total salaries and employee benefits
    8,267       4,448       85.9 %
     
Equipment and occupancy
    2,165       1,173       84.6 %
Marketing and business development
    252       191       31.9 %
Postage and supplies
    454       186       144.1 %
Amortization of core deposit intangible
    516       132       290.9 %
Other noninterest expense:
                       
Accounting and auditing
    162       166       (2.4 )%
Consultants, including independent loan review
    24       35       (31.4 )%
Legal, including borrower-related charges
    132       85       55.3 %
Directors’ fees
    60       56       7.1 %
Insurance, including FDIC assessments
    349       101       245.5 %
Other noninterest expense
    743       313       137.4 %
     
Total other noninterest expense
    1,470       756       94.4 %
     
Merger related expense
          443        
     
Total noninterest expense
  $ 13,124     $ 7,329       79.1 %
     
Expenses have generally increased between the above periods due to our merger with Cavalry, personnel additions occurring throughout each period, the continued development of our branch network and other expenses which increase in relation to our growth rate. We anticipate continued increases in our expenses in the future for such items as additional personnel, the opening of additional branches, audit expenses and other expenses which tend to increase in relation to our growth. For the three months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006, approximately $467,000 and $187,000, respectively, of compensation expense related to stock options and restricted share awards is included in other incentive compensation expense.
At March 31, 2007, we employed 419.5 full time equivalent employees compared to 404.0 at December 31, 2006. We intend to continue to add employees in both the Nashville and Knoxville markets to our work force for the foreseeable future, which will cause our salary costs to increase in future periods.
We believe that variable pay incentives are a valuable tool in motivating an employee base that is focused on providing our clients effective financial advice and increasing shareholder value. As a result, and unlike many other financial institutions, substantially all of our employees are eligible to participate in an annual cash incentive plan. Under the plan, the targeted level of incentive payments requires the Company to achieve a certain targeted earnings per share. To the extent that actual earnings per share are above or below targeted earnings per share, the aggregate incentive payments are increased or decreased.
Included in the salary and employee benefits amounts for the three months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006, were $590,000 and $480,000, respectively, related to variable cash awards. This expense will fluctuate from year to year and quarter to quarter based on the estimation of achievement of performance targets and the increase in the number of associates eligible to receive the award. Based on our current earnings forecast for 2007, for the three months ended March 31, 2007, we have anticipated a cash award to qualifying associates equal to 50% of their targeted award and consequently we have recorded incentive expense of 50% of the targeted award for the first three months of 2007. We will continue to review our anticipated 2007 cash incentive expense throughout 2007 which may require us to increase or decrease the anticipated award above or below the 50% amount at March 31, 2007 based on the new estimate. For the three months ended March 31, 2006, the anticipated award to be paid to associates equaled 100% of their targeted award. The incentive plan for 2007 is structured similarly to prior year plans in that the award is based on the achievement of soundness and earnings objectives.

Page 32


Table of Contents

Equipment and occupancy expenses in 2007 were greater than the 2006 amount by 85% due primarily to the additional branches and equipment acquired with the Cavalry merger. We also opened an office in the Donelson area of Nashville, Tennessee in the first quarter of 2007. These branch additions, and our planned expansion into the Knoxville market, will contribute toward an increase in our equipment and occupancy expenses throughout 2007 and future periods.
Marketing and other business development and postage and supplies expenses are higher in 2007 compared to 2006 and due to increases in the number of customers and prospective customers; increases in the number of customer contact personnel and the corresponding increases in customer entertainment; and other business development expenses. The addition of customers from the Cavalry merger had a direct impact on these increased charges.
Included in noninterest expense for 2007 and 2006 is $516,000 and $132,000, respectively of amortization of the core deposit intangible. This identified intangible is being amortized over seven years using an accelerated method which anticipates the life of the underlying deposits to which the intangible is attributable. Amortization expense associated with the core deposit intangible will approximate $1.8 million to $2.1 million per year for the next four years with lesser amounts for the remaining two years. Additionally, for the three months ended March 31, 2006, we incurred $443,000 of merger related expenses directly associated with the Cavalry merger. The merger related charges consisted of integration costs incurred in connection with the merger, including accelerated depreciation associated with software and other technology assets whose useful lives were shortened as a result of the Cavalry acquisition. We do not anticipate any additional merger related expenses associated with the Cavalry transaction in 2007.
Other noninterest expenses increased 94% in 2007 over 2006. Most of these increases are attributable to increased legal fees and insurance expenses. Also contributing to the increases in 2006 are incidental variable costs related to deposit gathering and lending. Examples include expenses related to ATM networks, correspondent bank service charges, check losses, appraisal expenses, closing attorney expenses and other items which have increased significantly as a result of the Cavalry merger.
Our efficiency ratio (ratio of noninterest expense to the sum of net interest income and noninterest income) was 59.4% for the first three months of 2007 compared to 63.4% in 2006. The efficiency ratio measures the amount of expense that is incurred to generate a dollar of revenue.
Financial Condition
Our consolidated balance sheet at March 31, 2007 reflects organic growth since December 31, 2006. Total assets grew to $2.193 billion at March 31, 2007 from $2.142 billion at December 31, 2006.
Loans. The composition of loans at March 31, 2007 and at December 31, 2006 and the percentage (%) of each classification to total loans are summarized as follows (dollars in thousands):
                                 
    March 31, 2007   December 31, 2006
    Amount   Percent   Amount   Percent  
     
Commercial real estate — Mortgage
  $ 287,498       18.5 %   $ 284,302     19.0 %  
Commercial real estate — Construction
    160,222       10.3 %     161,903     10.8 %  
Commercial — Other
    665,857       42.8 %     608,530     40.6 %  
     
Total commercial
    1,113,577       71.6 %     1,054,735     70.4 %  
     
Consumer real estate — Mortgage
    301,525       19.4 %     299,627     20.0 %  
Consumer real estate — Construction
    92,162       5.9 %     91,194     6.1 %  
Consumer — Other
    46,716       3.1 %     52,179     3.5 %  
     
Total consumer
    440,403       28.4 %     443,000     29.6 %  
     
Total loans
  $ 1,553,980       100.0 %   $ 1,497,735     100.0 %  
     
As noted above, we have increased the percentage of our outstanding loans in commercial versus commercial and consumer real estate during the three months ended March 31, 2007. Over the last few quarters, we have noted decreases in the number of real estate lending opportunities, particularly real estate construction lending, primarily due to the broader economy and developers avoiding increases in inventories. We will continue to pursue quality real estate lending opportunities. These types of loans require that we maintain effective credit and construction monitoring systems. Also and as a result of the Cavalry merger, we have increased our resources in this area such that we believe we can effectively manage this area of exposure through utilization of experienced professionals who are well-trained in this type of lending and who have significant experience in our geographic market.

Page 33


Table of Contents

We periodically analyze our commercial loan portfolio to determine if a concentration of credit risk exists to any one or more industries. We use broadly accepted industry classification systems in order to classify borrowers into various industry classifications. As a result, we have a credit exposure (loans outstanding plus unfunded commitments) exceeding 25% of Pinnacle National’s total risk-based capital to borrowers in the following industries at March 31, 2007 and December 31, 2006 (dollars in thousands):
                                 
    At March 31, 2007    
    Outstanding                
    Principal   Unfunded           Total Exposure at
    Balances   Commitments   Total exposure   December 31, 2006
     
Trucking industry
  $ 61,441     $ 23,382     $ 84,823     $ 89,862  
Lessors of nonresidential buildings
    123,740       17,033       140,773       133,504  
Lessors of residential buildings
    64,320       6,970       71,290       65,791  
Land subdividers
    117,113       41,825       158,938       164,535  
New housing operative builders
    126,084       67,133       193,217       192,373  
The following table classifies our fixed and variable rate loans at March 31, 2007 according to contractual maturities of (1) one year or less, (2) after one year through five years, and (3) after five years. The table also classifies our variable rate loans pursuant to the contractual repricing dates of the underlying loans (dollars in thousands):
                                         
    Amounts at March 31, 2007        
    Fixed   Variable           At March 31,   At December 31,
    Rates   Rates   Totals   2007   2006
     
Based on contractual maturity:
                                       
Due within one year
  $ 81,960     $ 579,683     $ 661,643       42.6 %     40.9 %
Due in one year to five years
    459,264       144,354       603,618       38.8 %     39.9 %
Due after five years
    80,604       208,115       288,719       18.6 %     19.2 %
     
Totals
  $ 621,828     $ 932,152     $ 1,553,980       100.0 %     100.0 %
     
 
                                       
Based on contractual repricing dates:
                                       
Daily floating rate
  $     $ 715,931     $ 715,931       46.1 %     46.1 %
Due within one year
    81,960       137,496       219,456       14.1 %     13.6 %
Due in one year to five years
    459,264       66,569       525,833       33.8 %     34.2 %
Due after five years
    80,604       12,156       92,760       6.0 %     6.1 %
     
Totals
  $ 621,828     $ 932,152     $ 1,553,980       100.0 %     100.0 %
     
 
The above information does not consider the impact of scheduled principal payments. Daily floating rate loans are tied to Pinnacle National’s prime lending rate or a national interest rate index with the underlying loan rates changing in relation to changes in these indexes.
Non-Performing Assets. The specific economic and credit risks associated with our loan portfolio include, but are not limited to, a general downturn in the economy which could affect employment rates in our market area, general real estate market deterioration, interest rate fluctuations, deteriorated or non-existent collateral, title defects, inaccurate appraisals, financial deterioration of borrowers, fraud, and any violation of laws and regulations.
We attempt to reduce these economic and credit risks by adherence to loan to value guidelines for collateralized loans, by investigating the creditworthiness of the borrower and by monitoring the borrower’s financial position. Also, we establish and periodically review our lending policies and procedures. Banking regulations limit our exposure by prohibiting loan relationships that exceed 15% of Pinnacle National’s statutory capital in the case of loans that are not fully secured by readily marketable or other permissible types of collateral. Furthermore, we have an internal limit for aggregate indebtedness to a single borrower of $15 million. Our loan policy requires that our board of directors approve any relationships that exceed this internal limit.
We discontinue the accrual of interest income when (1) there is a significant deterioration in the financial condition of the borrower and full repayment of principal and interest is not expected or (2) the principal or interest is more than 90 days past due, unless the loan is both well-secured and in the process of collection. At March 31, 2007, we had $4,774,000 in loans on nonaccrual compared to $7,070,000 at December 31, 2006. The decrease in nonperforming loans between March 31, 2007 and December 31, 2006 was primarily related to borrower payments received during the three months ended March 31, 2007.

Page 34


Table of Contents

At March 31, 2007, we owned $858,000 in real estate which we had acquired, usually through foreclosure, from borrowers compared to $995,000 at December 31, 2006. Substantially all of this amount relates to homes that are in various stages of construction for which we believe we have adequate collateral.
There were $98,000 of other loans 90 past due and still accruing interest at March 31, 2007 compared to $737,000 at December 31 , 2006. At March 31, 2007 and at December 31, 2006, no loans were deemed to be restructured loans. The following table is a summary of our nonperforming assets at March 31, 2007 and December 31, 2006 (dollars in thousands):
                 
    At Mar. 31,   At Dec. 31,
    2007   2006
     
Nonaccrual loans (1)
  $ 4,774     $ 7,070  
Restructured loans
           
Other real estate owned
    858       995  
     
Total nonperforming assets
    5,632       8,065  
Accruing loans past due 90 days or more
    98       737  
     
Total nonperforming assets and accruing loans past due 90 days or more
  $ 5,730     $ 8,802  
     
Total loans outstanding
  $ 1,553,980     $ 1,497,735  
     
Ratio of nonperforming assets and accruing loans past due 90 days or more to total loans outstanding at end of period
    0.37 %     0.59 %
     
Ratio of nonperforming assets and accruing loans past 90 days or more to total allowance for loan losses at end of period
    34.12 %     54.61 %
     
 
(1)   Interest income that would have been recorded during the three months ended March 31, 2007 related to nonaccrual loans was $102,000. Potential problem assets, which are not included in nonperforming assets, amounted to approximately $5.1 million or 0.21% of total loans outstanding at March 31, 2007, compared to $6.0 million, or 0.24% of total loans outstanding at December 31, 2006.
Potential problem assets represent those assets with a potential weakness or a well-defined weakness and where information about possible credit problems of borrowers has caused management to have serious doubts about the borrower’s ability to comply with present repayment terms. This definition is believed to be substantially consistent with the standards established by the OCC, Pinnacle National’s primary regulator for loans classified as substandard.
Allowance for Loan Losses (allowance). We maintain the allowance at a level that our management deems appropriate to adequately cover the inherent risks in the loan portfolio. As of March 31, 2007 and December 31, 2006, our allowance for loan losses was $16,792,000 and $16,118,000, respectively, which our management deemed to be adequate at each of the respective dates. The increase in our allowance was primarily the result of increases in loan balances and net charge-offs for the three months ended March 31, 2007. The judgments and estimates associated with our allowance determination are described under “Critical Accounting Estimates” above.
Approximately 71.6% of our loan portfolio at March 31, 2007 consisted of commercial loans compared to 70.4% at December 31, 2006. The following table sets forth, based on management’s best estimate, the allocation of the allowance to types of loans as well as the unallocated portion as of March 31, 2007 and December 31, 2006 and the percentage of loans in each category to the total loans (dollars in thousands):
                                 
    March 31, 2007   December 31, 2006
    Amount   Percent   Amount   Percent
     
Commercial real estate — Mortgage
  $ 4,538       18.5 %   $ 4,550       19.0 %
Commercial real estate — Construction
    2,529       10.3 %     2,591       10.8 %
Commercial — Other
    6,873       42.8 %     6,517       40.6 %
     
Total commercial
    13,940       71.6 %     13,658       70.4 %
     
Consumer real estate — Mortgage
    814       19.4 %     913       20.0 %
Consumer real estate — Construction
    249       5.9 %     278       6.1 %
Consumer — Other
    793       3.1 %     870       3.5 %
     
Total consumer
    1,856       28.4 %     2,061       29.6 %
     
Unallocated
    996     NA       399     NA  
     
Total allowance for loan losses
  $ 16,792       100.0 %   $ 16,118       100.0 %
     

Page 35


Table of Contents

The following is a summary of changes in the allowance for loan losses for the three months ended March 31, 2007 and for the year ended December 31, 2006 and the ratio of the allowance for loan losses to total loans as of the end of each period (dollars in thousands):
                 
    At Mar. 31,   At Dec. 31,
    2007   2006
     
Balance at beginning of period
  $ 16,118     $ 7,858  
Provision for loan losses
    788       3,732  
Allowance acquired in Cavalry acquisition
          5,102  
Charged-off loans:
               
Commercial real estate — Mortgage
           
Commercial real estate — Construction
           
Commercial — Other
    (47 )     (436 )
Consumer real estate — Mortgage
    (64 )     (46 )  
Consumer real estate — Construction
           
Consumer — Other
    (77 )     (336 )
     
Total charged-off loans
    (188 )     (818 )
     
Recoveries of previously charged-off loans:
               
Commercial real estate — Mortgage
           
Commercial real estate — Construction
    1        
Commercial — Other
    37       166  
Consumer real estate — Mortgage
    24        
Consumer real estate — Construction
           
Consumer — Other
    12       78  
     
Total recoveries of previously charged-off loans
    74       244  
     
Net (charge-offs) recoveries
    (114 )     (574 )
     
Balance at end of period
  $ 16,792     $ 16,118  
     
 
               
Ratio of allowance for loan losses to total loans outstanding at end of period
    1.08 %     1.08 %
     
Ratio of net charge-offs (*) to average loans outstanding for the period
    0.03 %     0.05 %
     
 
(*)   Net charge-offs for the three months ended March 31, 2007 have been annualized.
As a relatively new institution, we (excluding the impact of Cavalry), do not have extensive loss experience comparable to more mature financial institutions; however, as our loan portfolio matures, we will have additional charge-offs as our losses materialize. We consider the amount and nature of our charge-offs in determining the adequacy of our allowance for loan losses.
Investments. Our investment portfolio, consisting primarily of Federal agency bonds, state and municipal securities and mortgage-backed securities, amounted to $340 million and $346 million at March 31, 2007 and December 31, 2006, respectively. Our investment portfolio serves many purposes including serving as a stable source of income, collateral for public funds and as a liquidity source. A statistical comparison of our entire investment portfolio at March 31, 2007 and at December 31, 2006 is as follows:
                 
    March 31, 2007   December 31, 2006
     
Weighted average life
  4. 79  years   4.93  years
Weighted average coupon
    4.84  %     4.85  %
Tax equivalent yield
    5.01  %     5.01  %
Deposits and Other Borrowings. We had approximately $1.700 billion of deposits at March 31, 2007 compared to $1.622 billion at December 31, 2006. Our deposits consist of noninterest and interest-bearing demand accounts, savings accounts, money market accounts and time deposits. Additionally, we entered into agreements with certain customers to sell certain of our securities under agreements to repurchase the security the following day. These agreements (which are typically associated with comprehensive treasury management programs for our clients and provide them with short-term returns for their excess funds) amounted to $117.0

Page 36


Table of Contents

million at March 31, 2007 and $141.0 million at December 31, 2006. Additionally, at March 31, 2007, we had borrowed $26.7 million in advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank of Cincinnati compared to $53.7 million at December 31, 2006.
Generally, banks classify their funding base as either core funding or non-core funding. Core funding consists of all deposits other than time deposits issued in denominations of $100,000 or greater while all other funding is deemed to be non-core. The following table represents the balances of our deposits and other fundings and the percentage of each type to the total at March 31, 2007 and December 31, 2006 (dollars in thousands):
                                 
    March 31,           December 31,    
    2007   Percent   2006   Percent
     
Core funding:
                               
Noninterest-bearing deposit accounts
    306,885       16.0 %   $ 300,978       16.1 %
Interest-bearing demand accounts
    249,692       13.0 %     236,674       12.7 %
Savings and money market accounts
    499,476       26.1 %     485,936       26.0 %
Time deposit accounts less than $100,000
    147,055       7.7 %     158,687       8.5 %
     
Total core funding
    1,203,108       62.8 %     1,182,275       63.3 %
     
Non-core funding:
                               
Time deposit accounts greater than $100,000
                               
Public funds
    98,205       5.1 %     98,286       5.3 %
Brokered deposits
    99,140       5.2 %     61,718       3.3 %
Other time deposits
    299,679       15.7 %     280,132       15.0 %
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase
    116,952       6.1 %     141,016       7.5 %
Federal Home Loan Bank advances and Federal funds purchased
    46,619       2.4 %     53,726       2.9 %
Subordinated debt
    51,548       2.7 %     51,548       2.8 %
     
Total non-core funding
    712,143       37.2 %     686,426       36.7 %
     
Totals
  $ 1,915,251       100.0 %   $ 1,868,701       100.0 %
     
Subordinated debt. On December 29, 2003, we established PNFP Statutory Trust I; on September 15, 2005 we established PNFP Statutory Trust II; and on September 7, 2006 we established PNFP Statutory Trust III (“Trust I”; “Trust II”; “Trust III” or collectively, the “Trusts”). All are wholly-owned statutory business trusts. We are the sole sponsor of the Trusts and acquired each Trust’s common securities for $310,000; $619,000 and $619,000, respectively. The Trusts were created for the exclusive purpose of issuing 30-year capital trust preferred securities (“Trust Preferred Securities”) in the aggregate amount of $10,000,000 for Trust I; $20,000,000 for Trust II and $20,000,000 for Trust III and using the proceeds to acquire junior subordinated debentures (“Subordinated Debentures”) issued by Pinnacle Financial. The sole assets of the Trusts are the Subordinated Debentures. Our $1,548,000 investment in the Trusts is included in investments in unconsolidated subsidiaries in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets and our $51,548,000 obligation is reflected as subordinated debt.
The Trust I Preferred Securities bear a floating interest rate based on a spread over 3-month LIBOR (8.15% at March 31, 2007) which is set each quarter and matures on December 30, 2033. The Trust II Preferred Securities bear a fixed interest rate of 5. 848% per annum thru September 30, 2010 after which time the securities will bear a floating rate set each quarter based on a spread over 3-month LIBOR. The Trust II securities mature on September 30, 2035. The Trust III Preferred Securities bear a floating interest rate based on a spread over 3-month LIBOR (7.00% at March 31, 2007) which is set each quarter and mature on September 30, 2036.
Distributions are payable quarterly. The Trust Preferred Securities are subject to mandatory redemption upon repayment of the Subordinated Debentures at their stated maturity date or their earlier redemption in an amount equal to their liquidation amount plus accumulated and unpaid distributions to the date of redemption. We guarantee the payment of distributions and payments for redemption or liquidation of the Trust Preferred Securities to the extent of funds held by the Trusts. Pinnacle Financial’s obligations under the Subordinated Debentures together with the guarantee and other back-up obligations, in the aggregate, constitute a full and unconditional guarantee by Pinnacle Financial of the obligations of the Trusts under the Trust Preferred Securities.
The Subordinated Debentures are unsecured, bear interest at a rate equal to the rates paid by the Trusts on the Trust Preferred Securities and mature on the same dates as those noted above for the Trust Preferred Securities. Interest is payable quarterly. We may defer the payment of interest at any time for a period not exceeding 20 consecutive quarters provided that the deferral period

Page 37


Table of Contents

does not extend past the stated maturity. During any such deferral period, distributions on the Trust Preferred Securities will also be deferred and our ability to pay dividends on our common shares will be restricted.
Subject to approval by the Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta, the Trust Preferred Securities may be redeemed prior to maturity at our option on or after September 17, 2008 for Trust I; on or after September 30, 2010 for Trust II and September 30, 2011 for Trust III. The Trust Preferred Securities may also be redeemed at any time in whole (but not in part) in the event of unfavorable changes in laws or regulations that result in (1) the Trust becoming subject to Federal income tax on income received on the Subordinated Debentures, (2) interest payable by the parent company on the Subordinated Debentures becoming non-deductible for Federal tax purposes, (3) the requirement for the Trust to register under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended, or (4) loss of the ability to treat the Trust Preferred Securities as “Tier I capital” under the Federal Reserve capital adequacy guidelines.
The Trust Preferred Securities for the Trusts qualify as Tier I capital under current regulatory definitions subject to certain limitations.
Capital Resources. At March 31, 2007 and December 1, 2006, our stockholders’ equity amounted to $262.9 million and $256.0 million, respectively, or an increase of $6.9 million. This increase was primarily attributable to $6.0 million in comprehensive income, which was composed of $5.6 million in net income together with $382,000 of net unrealized holding gains associated with our available-for-sale portfolio.
Dividends. Pinnacle National is subject to restrictions on the payment of dividends to Pinnacle Financial under Federal banking laws and the regulations of the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency. We, in turn, are also subject to limits on payment of dividends to our shareholders by the rules, regulations and policies of Federal banking authorities and the laws of the State of Tennessee. We have not paid any dividends to date, nor do we anticipate paying dividends to our shareholders for the foreseeable future. Future dividend policy will depend on Pinnacle National’s earnings, capital position, financial condition and other factors.
Market and Liquidity Risk Management
Our objective is to manage assets and liabilities to provide a satisfactory, consistent level of profitability within the framework of established liquidity, loan, investment, borrowing, and capital policies. Our Asset Liability Management Committee (“ALCO”) is charged with the responsibility of monitoring these policies, which are designed to ensure acceptable composition of asset/liability mix. Two critical areas of focus for ALCO are interest rate sensitivity and liquidity risk management.
Interest Rate Sensitivity. In the normal course of business, we are exposed to market risk arising from fluctuations in interest rates. ALCO measures and evaluates the interest rate risk so that we can meet customer demands for various types of loans and deposits. ALCO determines the most appropriate amounts of on-balance sheet and off-balance sheet items. Measurements which we use to help us manage interest rate sensitivity include an earnings simulation model and an economic value of equity model. These measurements are used in conjunction with competitive pricing analysis.
Earnings simulation model. We believe that interest rate risk is best measured by our earnings simulation modeling. Forecasted levels of earning assets, interest-bearing liabilities, and off-balance sheet financial instruments are combined with ALCO forecasts of interest rates for the next 12 months and are combined with other factors in order to produce various earnings simulations. To limit interest rate risk, we have guidelines for our earnings at risk which seek to limit the variance of net interest income to less than a 20 percent decline for a 300 basis point change up or down in rates from management’s flat interest rate forecast over the next twelve months; to less than a 10 percent decline for a 200 basis point change up or down in rates from management’s flat interest rate forecast over the next twelve months; and to less than a 5 percent decline for a 100 basis point change up or down in rates from management’s flat interest rate forecast over the next twelve months. The results of our current simulation model would indicate that we are in compliance with our current guidelines at March 31, 2007.
Economic value of equity. Our economic value of equity model measures the extent that estimated economic values of our assets, liabilities and off-balance sheet items will change as a result of interest rate changes. Economic values are determined by discounting expected cash flows from assets, liabilities and off-balance sheet items, which establishes a base case economic value of equity. To help limit interest rate risk, we have a guideline stating that for an instantaneous 300 basis point change in interest rates up or down, the economic value of equity will not decrease by more than 30 percent from the base case; for a 200 basis point instantaneous change in interest rates up or down, the economic value of equity will not decrease by more than 20 percent; and for a 100 basis point instantaneous change in interest rates up or down, the economic value of equity will not decrease by more than 10 percent. The results of our current economic value of equity model would indicate that we are in compliance with our current guidelines at March 31, 2007.

Page 38


Table of Contents

Each of the above analyses may not, on its own, be an accurate indicator of how our net interest income will be affected by changes in interest rates. Income associated with interest-earning assets and costs associated with interest-bearing liabilities may not be affected uniformly by changes in interest rates. In addition, the magnitude and duration of changes in interest rates may have a significant impact on net interest income. For example, although certain assets and liabilities may have similar maturities or periods of repricing, they may react in different degrees to changes in market interest rates. Interest rates on certain types of assets and liabilities fluctuate in advance of changes in general market rates, while interest rates on other types may lag behind changes in general market rates. In addition, certain assets, such as adjustable rate mortgage loans, have features (generally referred to as “interest rate caps and floors”) which limit changes in interest rates. Prepayment and early withdrawal levels also could deviate significantly from those assumed in calculating the maturity of certain instruments. The ability of many borrowers to service their debts also may decrease during periods of rising interest rates. ALCO reviews each of the above interest rate sensitivity analyses along with several different interest rate scenarios as part of its responsibility to provide a satisfactory, consistent level of profitability within the framework of established liquidity, loan, investment, borrowing, and capital policies.
We may also use derivative financial instruments to improve the balance between interest-sensitive assets and interest-sensitive liabilities and as one tool to manage our interest rate sensitivity while continuing to meet the credit and deposit needs of our customers. At March 31, 2007 and December 31, 2006, we had not entered into any derivative contracts to assist managing our interest rate sensitivity.
Liquidity Risk Management. The purpose of liquidity risk management is to ensure that there are sufficient cash flows to satisfy loan demand, deposit withdrawals, and our other needs. Traditional sources of liquidity for a bank include asset maturities and growth in core deposits. A bank may achieve its desired liquidity objectives from the management of its assets and liabilities and by internally generated funding through its operations. Funds invested in marketable instruments that can be readily sold and the continuous maturing of other earning assets are sources of liquidity from an asset perspective. The liability base provides sources of liquidity through attraction of increased deposits and borrowing funds from various other institutions.
Changes in interest rates also affect our liquidity position. We currently price deposits in response to market rates and our management intends to continue this policy. If deposits are not priced in response to market rates, a loss of deposits could occur which would negatively affect our liquidity position.
Scheduled loan payments are a relatively stable source of funds, but loan payoffs and deposit flows fluctuate significantly, being influenced by interest rates, general economic conditions and competition. Additionally, debt security investments are subject to prepayment and call provisions that could accelerate their payoff prior to stated maturity. We attempt to price our deposit products to meet our asset/liability objectives consistent with local market conditions. Our ALCO is responsible for monitoring our ongoing liquidity needs. Our regulators also monitor our liquidity and capital resources on a periodic basis.
In addition, Pinnacle National is a member of the Federal Home Loan Bank of Cincinnati. As a result, Pinnacle National receive s advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank of Cincinnati, pursuant to the terms of various borrowing agreements, which assist it in the funding of its home mortgage and commercial real estate loan portfolios. Pinnacle National has pledged under the borrowing agreements with the Federal Home Loan Bank of Cincinnati certain qualifying residential mortgage loans and, pursuant to a blanket lien, all qualifying commercial mortgage loans as collateral. At March 31, 2007, Pinnacle National had received advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank of Cincinnati totaling $26.7 million at the following rates and maturities (dollars in thousands):
                 
    Amount     Interest Rates  
     
2007
  $ 1,000       3.95 %
2008
    10,000       4.97 %
2009
    15,000       5.01 %
Thereafter
    712       2.25 %
 
             
Total
  $ 26,712          
 
             
Weighted average interest rate
            4.88 %
 
             
At March 31, 2007, brokered certificates of deposit approximated $99.1 million which represented 5.2% of total fundings compared to $61.7 million and 3.3% at December 31, 2006. We issue these brokered certificates through several different brokerage houses based on competitive bid. Typically, these funds are for varying maturities from six months to two years and are issued at rates which are competitive to rates we would be required to pay to attract similar deposits from the local market as well as rates for Federal Home Loan Bank of Cincinnati advances of similar maturities. We consider these deposits to be a ready source of liquidity under current market conditions.
At March 31, 2007, we had no significant commitments for capital expenditures. However, we are in the process of developing our branch network or other office facilities in the Nashville MSA and the Knoxville MSA. As a result, we anticipate that we will enter into contracts to buy property or construct branch facilities and/or lease agreements to lease facilities in the Nashville MSA and Knoxville MSA.

Page 39


Table of Contents

Our management believes that we have adequate liquidity to meet all known contractual obligations and unfunded commitments, including loan commitments and reasonable borrower, depositor, and creditor requirements over the next twelve months.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements. At March 31, 2007, we had outstanding standby letters of credit of $54.8 million and unfunded loan commitments outstanding of $510.6 million. Because these commitments generally have fixed expiration dates and many will expire without being drawn upon, the total commitment level does not necessarily represent future cash requirements. If needed to fund these outstanding commitments, Pinnacle National has the ability to liquidate Federal funds sold or securities available-for- sale, or on a short-term basis to borrow and purchase Federal funds from other financial institutions.
At March 31, 2007, Pinnacle National had accommodations with upstream correspondent banks for unsecured short-term advances. These accommodations have various covenants related to their term and availability, and in most cases must be repaid within less than a month.
Impact of Inflation
The consolidated financial statements and related consolidated financial data presented herein have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States and practices within the banking industry which require the measurement of financial position and operating results in terms of historical dollars without considering the changes in the relative purchasing power of money over time due to inflation. Unlike most industrial companies, virtually all the assets and liabilities of a financial institution are monetary in nature. As a result, interest rates have a more significant impact on a financial institution’s performance than the effects of general levels of inflation.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In September 2006, SFAS No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements” – SFAS No. 157 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in generally accepted accounting principles and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. SFAS No. 157 applies only to fair-value measurements that are already required or permitted by other accounting standards and is expected to increase the consistency of those measurements. The definition of fair value focuses on the exit price, i.e., the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date, not the entry price, i.e., the price that would be paid to ac quire the asset or received to assume the liability at the measurement date. The statement emphasizes that fair value is a market-based measurement not an entity-specific measurement. Therefore, the fair value measurement should be determined based on the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability. The effective date for SFAS No. 157 is for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007, and interim periods within those fiscal years. We are currently evaluating the impact of SFAS No. 157 on its consolidated financial statements.
In February of 2007, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standard No. 159 (“SFAS 159”), The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities, which gives entities the option to measure eligible financial assets, and financial liabilities at fair value on an instrument by instrument basis, that are otherwise not permitted to be accounted for at fair value under other accounting standards. The election to use the fair value option is available when an entity first recognizes a financial asset or financial liability. Subsequent changes in fair value must be recorded in earnings. This statement is effective as of the beginning of a company’s first fiscal year after November 15, 2007. We are in the process of analyzing the impact of SFAS 159.

Page 40


Table of Contents

ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
The information required by this Item 3 is included on pages 37 through 39 of Part I — Item 2 — “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.”
ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Pinnacle Financial maintains disclosure controls and procedures, as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”), that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by it in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms and that such information is accumulated and communicated to Pinnacle Financial’s management, including its Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. Pinnacle Financial carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of its management, including its Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of its disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on the evaluation of these disclosure controls and procedures, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that Pinnacle Financial’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective.
Changes in Internal Controls
There were no changes in Pinnacle Financial’s internal control over financial reporting during Pinnacle Financial’s fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2007 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, Pinnacle Financial’s internal control over financial reporting.

Page 41


Table of Contents

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
There are no material pending legal proceedings to which the Company is a party or of which any of their property is the subject.
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS
Except as disclosed below, there have been no material changes to our risk factors as previously disclosed in Part I, Item IA of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006.
We may not be able to expand into the Knoxville market in the time frame and at the levels that we currently expect and our projected expansion will reduce our net income for the 2007 fiscal year.
In order to expand our operations into the Knoxville market we will be required to hire a significant number of new associates and build out a branch network. We can not assure you that we will be able to hire the number of experienced associates that we need to successfully execute our strategy in the Knoxville market, nor can we assure you that the associates that we hire will be able to successfully execute our growth strategy in that market. Because we seek to hire experienced associates, the compensation cost associated with these individuals may be higher than that of other financial institutions of similar size in the market. If we are unable to grow our loan portfolio at planned rates, the increased compensation expense of these experienced associates may negatively impact our results of operations. Because there will be a period of time before we are able to fully deploy our resources in the Knoxville market, our start up costs, including the cost of our associates and our branch expansion, will negatively impact our results of operations. In addition, if we are not able to expand our branch footprint in the Knoxville market in the time period that we have targeted, our results of operations may be negatively impacted. Execution of our growth plans in the Knoxville market also depends on continued growth in the Knoxville economy.
ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS
  (a)   Not applicable
 
  (b)   Not applicable
 
  (c)   The Company did not repurchase any shares of the Company’s common stock during the quarter ended March 31, 2007.
ITEM 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES
Not applicable
ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
None
ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION
None

Page 42


Table of Contents

ITEM 6. EXHIBITS
  31.1   Certification pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a)
 
  31.2   Certification pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a)
 
  32.1   Certification pursuant to 18 USC Section 1350 – Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
 
  32.2   Certification pursuant to 18 USC Section 1350 – Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
Pinnacle Financial is a party to certain agreements entered into in connection with the offering by PNFP Statutory Trust I, PNFP Statutory Trust II and PNFP Statutory Trust III of an aggregate of $50,000,000 in trust preferred securities, as more fully described in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. In accordance with Item 601(b)(4)(ii) of Regulation SB, and because the total amount of the trust preferred securities is not in excess of 10% of Pinnacle Financial’s total assets, Pinnacle Financial has not filed the various documents and agreements associated with the trust preferred securities herewith. Pinnacle Financial has, however, agreed to furnish copies of the various documents and agreements associated with the trust preferred securities to the Securities and Exchange Commission upon request.

Page 43


Table of Contents

SIGNATURES
     Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
         
 
  PINNACLE FINANCIAL PARTNERS, INC    
 
       
 
  /s/ M. Terry Turner    
 
 
 
M. Terry Turner
   
May 3, 2007
  President and Chief Executive Officer    
 
       
 
  /s/ Harold R. Carpenter    
 
 
 
Harold R. Carpenter
   
May 3, 2007
  Chief Financial Officer    

Page 44