def14a
SCHEDULE 14A
(RULE 14a-101)
INFORMATION REQUIRED IN PROXY STATEMENT
SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION
Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (Amendment No. __________)
Filed by the Registrant
þ
Filed by a Party other than the Registrant o
|
|
|
Check the appropriate box: |
|
|
|
o Preliminary Proxy Statement
|
o |
CONFIDENTIAL, FOR USE OF THE COMMISSION ONLY
(AS PERMITTED BY RULE 14a-6(e)(2)) |
þ Definitive Proxy Statement |
|
|
|
o Definitive Additional Materials |
|
|
|
o
Soliciting Material Pursuant to § 240.14a-12 |
|
|
|
|
|
CAPITAL AUTOMOTIVE REIT |
(Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter) |
|
|
|
|
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant) |
Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):
þ No fee required.
o
Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11.
(1) Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:
(2) Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:
(3) Per
unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant
to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth
the
amount
on which the filing fee is
calculated and state how it was determined):
(4) Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:
(5) Total fee paid:
o Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.
o Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act
Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid
previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or
the form or schedule and the date of its filing.
(1) Amount Previously Paid:
(2) Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:
(3) Filing Party:
(4) Date Filed:
Notes:
April 4, 2005
Dear Common Shareholders:
On behalf of the Board of Trustees and employees of Capital
Automotive REIT, I cordially invite you to attend the 2005
Annual Meeting of Capital Automotive REITs shareholders.
We will be holding the Annual Meeting on May 10, 2005 at
8:30 a.m. local time at The Ritz-Carlton, Tysons Corner,
located at 1700 Tysons Boulevard, McLean, Virginia 22102.
Enclosed with this letter is a Notice of the Annual Meeting of
Shareholders, a Proxy Statement, a proxy card and a return
envelope. Both the Notice of Annual Meeting and the Proxy
Statement provide details of the business that we will conduct
at the Annual Meeting and other information about us. Also
enclosed with this letter is our Annual Report to Shareholders
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004.
At the 2005 Annual Meeting, we will ask you to:
|
|
|
|
|
Elect nine Trustees; |
|
|
|
Ratify the selection of Ernst & Young LLP as
independent auditors for the fiscal year ending
December 31, 2005; and |
|
|
|
Transact any other business that is properly presented at the
Annual Meeting. |
Whether or not you plan to attend the Annual Meeting, please
sign, date and promptly return the proxy card in the enclosed
prepaid return envelope, or, if applicable, follow the
directions on the proxy card for telephonic or internet voting.
Your common shares will be voted at the Annual Meeting in
accordance with your proxy instructions. Of course, if you
attend the Annual Meeting you may vote in person. If you plan to
attend the meeting, please mark the appropriate box on the
enclosed proxy card.
|
|
|
Sincerely, |
|
|
|
|
|
John J. Pohanka |
|
Chairman of the Board |
YOUR VOTE AT THE ANNUAL MEETING IS VERY IMPORTANT TO US.
Please Sign, Date and Return Your Proxy Card Before the Annual
Meeting.
If you have any questions about voting your common shares,
please contact Lisa M. Clements, Capital Automotive REIT, 8270
Greensboro Drive, Suite 950, McLean, Virginia 22102,
telephone no. (703) 288-3075.
CAPITAL AUTOMOTIVE REIT
|
|
|
|
NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS |
|
|
|
|
|
Date: Tuesday, May 10, 2005 |
|
|
Time: 8:30 a.m. local time |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Place: |
The Ritz-Carlton, Tysons Corner |
|
|
|
|
|
1700 Tysons Boulevard |
|
|
McLean, Virginia 22102 |
|
Dear Common Shareholders:
At the 2005 Annual Meeting, we will ask you to:
|
|
|
|
|
Elect nine Trustees; |
|
|
|
Ratify the selection of Ernst & Young LLP as
independent auditors for the fiscal year ending
December 31, 2005; and |
|
|
|
Transact any other business that is properly presented at the
Annual Meeting. |
You will be able to vote your common shares at the Annual
Meeting if you were a shareholder of record at the close of
business on March 1, 2005. Our preferred shareholders are
not entitled to receive notice of, or to vote at, the Annual
Meeting.
|
|
|
By Order of the Board of Trustees: |
|
|
|
|
|
John M. Weaver |
|
Secretary |
April 4, 2005
YOUR VOTE AT THE ANNUAL MEETING IS VERY IMPORTANT.
Please indicate your vote on the enclosed proxy card and
return it in the enclosed
envelope as soon as possible, even if you plan to attend the
meeting.
If you have questions about voting your common shares, please
contact
Lisa M. Clements, Capital Automotive REIT, 8270 Greensboro
Drive,
Suite 950, McLean, Virginia 22102, telephone no.
(703) 288-3075.
If you attend the meeting, you will be able to revoke your
proxy and vote in person.
CAPITAL AUTOMOTIVE REIT
8270 Greensboro Drive, Suite 950
McLean, Virginia 22102
April 4, 2005
PROXY STATEMENT FOR ANNUAL MEETING
This Proxy Statement provides information that you should read
before you vote on the proposals that will be presented to you
at the 2005 Annual Meeting of the Shareholders of Capital
Automotive REIT, which we sometimes refer to as Capital
Automotive or the Company. The 2005 Annual Meeting will be held
on Tuesday, May 10, 2005 at 8:30 a.m. local time at
The Ritz-Carlton, Tysons Corner, 1700 Tysons Boulevard, McLean,
Virginia 22102.
This Proxy Statement provides detailed information about the
Annual Meeting, the proposals you will be asked to vote on at
the Annual Meeting, and other relevant information.
On April 4, 2005, we began mailing information to
shareholders who, according to our records, owned our common
shares of beneficial interest at the close of business on
March 1, 2005. We are mailing with that information a copy
of our Annual Report to Shareholders for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2004.
Table of Contents
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
|
23 |
|
i
INFORMATION ABOUT THE 2005 ANNUAL MEETING AND VOTING
The Annual Meeting
The Annual Meeting will be held on Tuesday, May 10, 2005 at
8:30 a.m. local time at The Ritz-Carlton, Tysons Corner,
1700 Tysons Boulevard, McLean, Virginia 22102.
This Proxy Solicitation
We are sending you this Proxy Statement because our Board of
Trustees is seeking a proxy to vote your common shares at the
Annual Meeting. This Proxy Statement is intended to assist you
in deciding how to vote your common shares. On April 4,
2005, we began mailing this Proxy Statement to all shareholders
who, according to our shareholder records, owned common shares
at the close of business on March 1, 2005. Our preferred
shareholders are not entitled to receive notice of, or to vote
at, the Annual Meeting.
We are paying the cost of requesting these proxies. Our
Trustees, officers and employees may request proxies in person
or by telephone, mail, facsimile or letter. We will reimburse
brokers and other nominees their reasonable out-of-pocket
expenses for forwarding proxy materials to beneficial owners of
our common shares.
If you and other residents at your mailing address own common
shares in street name, your broker or bank may have sent you a
notice that your household will receive only one Proxy Statement
and Annual Report to Shareholders for each company in which you
hold common shares through that broker or bank. This practice of
sending only one copy of proxy materials is known as
householding. If you did not respond that you did
not want to participate in householding, you were deemed to have
consented to the process. If the foregoing procedures apply to
you, your broker has sent one copy of our Proxy Statement and
Annual Report to Shareholders to your address. You may revoke
your consent to householding at any time by contacting your
broker, or if your common shares are not held by a broker or
bank, by sending your name and account number to our transfer
agent, American Stock Transfer & Trust Company
(AST), 59 Maiden Lane, New York, NY 10038, Attn:
Shareholder Services, or by contacting AST via email at
info@amstock.com. The revocation of your consent to householding
will be effective 30 days following its receipt. In any
event, if you did not receive an individual copy of this Proxy
Statement or our Annual Report to Shareholders, we will send a
copy to you if you address your written request to or call our
transfer agent, as referenced above, phone number
1-800-937-5449. If you are receiving multiple copies of our
Proxy Statement and Annual Report to Shareholders, you may
request householding by contacting our transfer agent in the
same manner.
Voting Your Shares
You have one vote for each of our common shares that you owned
of record at the close of business on March 1, 2005. The
number of common shares you own (and may vote at the Annual
Meeting) is listed on the enclosed proxy card.
You may vote your common shares at the Annual Meeting either in
person or by proxy. To vote in person, you must attend the
Annual Meeting and obtain and submit a ballot. Ballots for
voting in person will be available at the Annual Meeting. To
vote by proxy, you must complete and return the enclosed proxy
card. By completing and returning the proxy card, you will be
directing the persons designated on the proxy card to vote your
common shares at the Annual Meeting in accordance with the
instructions you give on the proxy card.
If you decide to vote by proxy, your proxy card will be valid
only if
you sign, date and return it before the Annual Meeting.
If you complete the proxy card but do not provide the voting
instructions, then your shares will be voted FOR each of
the Trustees identified on the proxy card and FOR
ratification of the selection of Ernst & Young LLP
as our independent auditors for the 2005 fiscal year.
1
Revoking Your Proxy
If you decide to change your vote, you may revoke your proxy at
any time before it is voted. You may revoke your proxy in any
one of three ways:
|
|
|
|
|
You may notify our Secretary in writing that you wish to revoke
your proxy. |
|
|
|
You may submit a proxy dated later than your original proxy. |
|
|
|
You may attend the Annual Meeting and vote by ballot. Merely
attending the Annual Meeting will not by itself revoke a proxy;
you must obtain a ballot and vote your common shares to revoke
the proxy. |
Vote Required for Approval
|
|
|
Proposal 1: Election of Nine Trustees |
|
The nine nominees for Trustee who receive the most votes will be
elected. If you indicate withhold authority to vote
for a particular nominee on your proxy card, your vote will not
count either for or against the nominee. |
|
Proposal 2: Ratification of Selection of Independent
Auditors |
|
The affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast at the
Annual Meeting is required to ratify the selection of
independent auditors. If you abstain from voting, your
abstention will not count as a vote cast for or against the
proposal. |
YOUR VOTE AT THE ANNUAL MEETING IS VERY IMPORTANT TO US.
Broker non-votes (i.e., shares held by a broker or nominee which
are represented at the Annual Meeting, but with respect to which
such broker or nominee is not empowered by the beneficial owner
of the stock to vote on a particular proposal) with respect to
the election of Trustees and the ratification of selection of
independent auditors will have no effect on the outcome of the
vote on these proposals.
Quorum. On the record date for the Annual Meeting,
March 1, 2005, there were 43,681,878 common shares issued
and outstanding. A quorum must be present at the
Annual Meeting in order to transact business. A quorum will be
present if 21,631,480 common shares are represented at the
Annual Meeting, either in person (by the shareholders) or by
proxy. If a quorum is not present, a vote cannot occur. In
deciding whether a quorum is present, abstentions and any broker
non-votes will be counted as shares that are represented at the
Annual Meeting.
Additional Information
Our Annual Report to Shareholders for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2004, including consolidated financial
statements, is being mailed to all shareholders entitled to vote
at the Annual Meeting together with this Proxy Statement. The
Annual Report does not constitute a part of the proxy
solicitation material. The Annual Report tells you how to get
additional information about us.
2
PROPOSALS TO BE PRESENTED AT THE ANNUAL MEETING
We will present the following two proposals at the Annual
Meeting. We have described in this proxy statement all the
proposals that we expect will be made at the Annual Meeting. If
a shareholder or we properly present any other proposal to the
meeting after February 16, 2005, we will, to the extent
permitted by applicable law, use your proxy to vote your shares
on the proposal in our best judgment.
1. Election of Trustees
Our Board of Trustees currently consists of nine Trustees. One
of our current Board Members, John E. Anderson, has decided not
to stand for re-election. The nominees for election to the Board
of Trustees are:
|
|
|
Thomas D. Eckert |
|
Craig L. Fuller |
|
Paul M. Higbee |
|
William E. Hoglund |
|
David B. Kay |
|
R. Michael McCullough |
|
John J. Pohanka |
|
Robert M. Rosenthal |
|
Vincent A. Sheehy |
Each Trustee will be elected to serve for a one-year term, or
until his replacement is elected and qualifies, or until his
earlier resignation or removal. All but one of the nine nominees
are presently members of the Board of Trustees and have
consented to serve as a Trustee if re-elected. More detailed
information about each of the nominees is available in the
section of this booklet titled The Board of
Trustees, which begins on page 6.
If any of the nominees cannot serve for any reason, the Board of
Trustees may designate a substitute nominee or nominees. If a
substitute is nominated, we will vote all valid proxies for the
election of the substitute nominee or nominees. The Board of
Trustees may also decide to leave the board seat or seats open
until a suitable candidate or candidates are located, or it may
decide to reduce the size of the Board. Proxies for the Annual
Meeting may not be voted for more than nine nominees.
The Board of Trustees unanimously recommends that you
vote FOR these Trustees.
2. Ratification of Appointment
of Ernst & Young LLP as Independent Auditors
Ernst & Young LLP has served as our independent auditor
since May 23, 2002. The Audit Committee currently believes
that we should continue our relationship with Ernst &
Young LLP and have appointed Ernst & Young LLP to
continue as our independent auditors for the fiscal year ending
December 31, 2005. In the event that the shareholders do
not ratify this appointment by the requisite vote, the Audit
Committee will reconsider its appointment of Ernst &
Young LLP.
One or more representatives of Ernst & Young LLP will
be available at the Annual Meeting to answer your questions and
make a statement if they desire.
3
Fiscal 2004 and 2003 Audit Firm Fee Summary. The
following table presents fees for professional audit services
rendered by Ernst & Young LLP for the audit of the
Companys annual financial statements for 2004 and 2003,
and fees for other services rendered:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year 2004 | |
|
Fiscal Year 2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Audit Fees (1)
|
|
$ |
822,190 |
|
|
$ |
204,500 |
|
Audit Related Fees (2)
|
|
|
38,440 |
|
|
|
130,003 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Audit and Audit Related Fees
|
|
|
860,630 |
|
|
|
334,503 |
|
Tax Fees (3)
|
|
|
258,005 |
|
|
|
164,883 |
|
All Other Fees
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Fees
|
|
$ |
1,118,635 |
|
|
$ |
499,386 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
Audit fees include the fees for the audit of our annual
financial statements and the review of our quarterly financial
statements, fees for the audit of our internal control over
financial reporting, fees for the attestation of
managements report on the effectiveness of internal
control over financial reporting, fees for comfort letters, and
fees for services that are normally provided by the auditor in
connection with statutory and regulatory filings or engagements. |
|
(2) |
Audit related fees consist of fees for assurance and related
services that are related to the performance of the audit or
review of our financial statements and internal control over
financial reporting, including fees incurred for consultation
concerning financial accounting and reporting standards,
performance of agreed-upon procedures, and other audit or attest
services not required by statute or regulation. |
|
|
(3) |
Tax fees consist of fees for tax consultation and tax compliance
services. Of the total tax fees, approximately $207,000 and
$133,000 represent tax compliance and preparation fees for 2004
and 2003, respectively. The remainder in each respective year
represents tax compliance-related and other services. |
The Audit Committee has determined that the provision of audit
related and tax services by Ernst & Young LLP during
2004 are compatible with maintaining Ernst & Young
LLPs independence.
The Board of Trustees unanimously recommends that you
vote FOR ratification of the appointment of
Ernst & Young LLP as our independent auditors for our
fiscal year ending December 31, 2005.
SHARE OWNERSHIP
There were 43,681,878 common shares issued and outstanding on
March 1, 2005. The following table shows how many common
shares (including certain securities that are redeemable,
convertible or exercisable for shares) on a fully converted
basis that were owned on March 1, 2005 (unless otherwise
indicated in a footnote) by:
|
|
|
|
|
each person who owned more than 5% of the issued and outstanding
common shares on a fully converted basis; |
|
|
|
each of our current Trustees and our new trustee nominee; |
|
|
|
our Chief Executive Officer; and |
|
|
|
each of the other persons named in the Executive
Compensation-Summary Compensation Table on page 13. |
The table also shows how many common shares (calculated on the
basis described below) that were owned by all of our current
Trustees, our trustee nominee and our executive officers
together. For purposes of this table, fully converted
basis means common shares and securities redeemable or
exercisable for
4
common shares that are currently redeemable or exercisable or
that will become redeemable or exercisable within 60 days
of March 1, 2005. The number of common shares set forth
below includes the number of:
|
|
|
|
|
common shares the person holds; |
|
|
|
common shares the person could receive (if we elect to issue
shares (on a one-for-one basis) rather than pay cash) upon
redemption of units of Capital Automotive L.P. (which we refer
to as the Partnership, and of which we are the sole general
partner), held by the person; |
|
|
|
common shares the person could receive on exercise of options
for shares held by the person that are exercisable within
60 days of March 1, 2005; |
|
|
|
common shares the person could receive upon the vesting of
restricted shares held by the person that vest within
60 days of March 1, 2005, unless the person has agreed
to defer receipt of the common shares until a later date
pursuant to a written agreement with us; and |
|
|
|
common shares the person could receive upon the payment of
phantom shares held by the person within 60 days of
March 1, 2005, unless the person has agreed to defer
receipt of the common shares until a later date pursuant to a
written agreement with us. |
The owners have sole voting and investment power unless
otherwise indicated. The address of the Trustees and the
executive officers is c/o Capital Automotive REIT, 8270
Greensboro Drive, Suite 950, McLean, Virginia 22102.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of | |
|
Percent | |
Name and Address of Beneficial Owner |
|
Shares | |
|
of Shares | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Robert M. Rosenthal (1)
|
|
|
2,722,013 |
|
|
|
5.87 |
% |
John J. Pohanka (2)
|
|
|
1,245,686 |
|
|
|
2.80 |
% |
John E. Anderson (3)
|
|
|
703,334 |
|
|
|
1.61 |
% |
Thomas D. Eckert (4)
|
|
|
135,108 |
|
|
|
* |
|
Vincent A. Sheehy (5)
|
|
|
59,318 |
|
|
|
* |
|
John M. Weaver (6)
|
|
|
39,451 |
|
|
|
* |
|
David S. Kay (7)
|
|
|
27,442 |
|
|
|
* |
|
Paul M. Higbee (8)
|
|
|
17,334 |
|
|
|
* |
|
Craig L. Fuller (9)
|
|
|
16,662 |
|
|
|
* |
|
William E. Hoglund (9)
|
|
|
10,484 |
|
|
|
* |
|
R. Michael McCullough (10)
|
|
|
9,334 |
|
|
|
* |
|
Jay M. Ferriero
|
|
|
6,707 |
|
|
|
* |
|
Lisa M. Clements
|
|
|
2,936 |
|
|
|
* |
|
David B. Kay (11)
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
* |
|
All Executive Officers and Trustees as a Group (14 Persons)
|
|
|
4,995,809 |
|
|
|
10.56 |
% |
|
|
(1) |
Mr. Rosenthals ownership includes his direct and
indirect ownership of common shares of the Company and units of
the Partnership. The number of shares and units owned is based
on a report on Schedule 13G/ A filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission (SEC) on November 11,
2003, as updated by representations of Mr. Rosenthal as of
January 26, 2005. The Rosenthal Family, L.L.C., of which
Mr. Rosenthal is the managing member, holds
838,220 units of the Partnership. Mr. Rosenthal has
sole voting and investment power directly over one common share.
The remainder of the units of the Partnership are held as
follows: 286,518 units are held by R.P. Gaithersburg
Limited Partnership, of which Mr. Rosenthal is general
partner; and 1,578,940 units are held by 8525 Leesburg Pike
Limited Partnership, of which Mr. Rosenthal is general
partner. In addition, Mr. Rosenthal has sole voting and
investment power over currently exercisable options for 18,334
common shares. Mr. Rosenthal disclaims voting and
investment power over 291,417 units held by relatives not
living in his home or held by employees of entities that he
controls. |
|
(2) |
Mr. Pohankas ownership includes his direct and
indirect ownership of common shares of the Company and units of
the Partnership. The number of common shares and units owned is
based on a report on Schedule 13G/ A filed with the SEC on
January 16, 2002, as updated by representations of
Mr. Pohanka as of January 19, 2005. Mr. Pohanka
has sole voting and investment power directly over currently
exercisable options for 18,334 common shares. The balance of the
common shares and units are held as follows: 5,250 common shares
held by Pohanka Grandchildren Trust; 439,239 common shares and
774,462 units held by Pohanka |
5
|
|
|
Properties, Inc.; and 8,400 common
shares held by Pohanka Imports, Inc. The Pohanka Grandchildren
Trust, of which John J. Pohanka is the Trustee, has sole voting
and investment power over its 5,250 common shares. Pohanka
Properties, Inc., of which John J. Pohanka is President, has
sole voting and investment power over its 439,239 common shares.
Pohanka Properties, Inc. shares investment power with
Mr. Pohanka over the 774,462 units. Pohanka Imports,
Inc., of which John J. Pohanka is the President, has sole voting
and investment power over its 8,400 common shares.
Mr. Pohanka disclaims beneficial ownership of 7,000 common
shares held by his spouse. Includes one common share not
reported on Schedule 13G.
|
|
(3) |
Includes currently exercisable
options for 23,334 common shares.
|
|
(4) |
Mr. Eckert has shared voting
and investment power with his spouse over 123,128 common shares.
|
|
(5) |
Includes currently exercisable
options for 33,334 common shares. Mr. Sheehy has sole
voting and investment power directly over 10,000 units.
Mr. Sheehys ownership also includes ownership of
15,984 units that he received upon the dissolution of
Sheehy Investments Two, L.C. in July 2003, of which
Mr. Sheehy was a limited partner with an 18% pecuniary
interest.
|
|
(6) |
Mr. Weaver has shared voting
and investment power with his spouse over all of his common
shares.
|
|
(7) |
Mr. David S. Kay has shared
voting and investment power with his spouse over 27,442 common
shares.
|
|
(8) |
Includes currently exercisable
options for 13,334 common shares. Mr. Higbee has shared
voting and investment power with his spouse over 4,000 common
shares.
|
|
(9) |
Includes currently exercisable
options for 8,334 common shares.
|
|
|
(10) |
Includes currently exercisable options for 8,334 common shares.
Mr. McCullough has shared voting and investment power with
his spouse over 1,000 common shares. |
|
(11) |
Mr. David B. Kay is a new nominee to our Board of Trustees. |
THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES
The following table and biographical descriptions set forth the
name, age and principal occupations during the past five years
for each nominee, and the positions they currently hold with us.
The information is as of March 1, 2005 unless otherwise
indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name |
|
Age | |
|
Position |
|
Trustee Since |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
John J. Pohanka
|
|
|
76 |
|
|
Chairman of the Board of Trustees |
|
February 1998 |
Thomas D. Eckert
|
|
|
57 |
|
|
President and Chief Executive Officer and Trustee |
|
October 1997 |
Craig L. Fuller
|
|
|
54 |
|
|
Trustee |
|
April 1998 |
Paul M. Higbee
|
|
|
50 |
|
|
Trustee |
|
October 2003 |
William E. Hoglund
|
|
|
70 |
|
|
Trustee |
|
February 1998 |
David B. Kay
|
|
|
47 |
|
|
Trustee Nominee |
|
|
R. Michael McCullough
|
|
|
66 |
|
|
Trustee |
|
April 1998 |
Robert M. Rosenthal
|
|
|
77 |
|
|
Trustee |
|
February 1998 |
Vincent A. Sheehy
|
|
|
46 |
|
|
Trustee |
|
April 1998 |
John J. Pohanka is the Chairman of our Board of Trustees.
Mr. Pohanka has been involved in the automotive industry
for over 50 years and is also the Chairman of the Pohanka
Automotive Group, a position he has held for over five years.
Founded in 1919, the Pohanka Automotive Group is currently
comprised of 13 dealerships, each of which is located in the
greater Washington, D.C. Metropolitan Area. The Pohanka
Automotive Groups dealerships have received numerous
awards, including the Time magazine Quality Dealer Award.
Mr. Pohanka has been active in a number of national and
local industry and business groups during his career, including
having served as a past president of the National Automobile
Dealers Association (NADA), a past President of the National
Capitol Area Automotive Trade Association, and a past chairman
of the National Institute for Automotive Service Excellence, a
group he co-founded.
Thomas D. Eckert is our President and Chief Executive
Officer and is a member of the Board of Trustees.
Mr. Eckert was one of the founders of Capital Automotive in
October 1997. From 1983 to 1997, Mr. Eckert was employed by
Pulte Home Corporation, one of the largest homebuilding firms in
the U.S., serving most recently as President of Pultes
Mid-Atlantic Region. Prior to working at Pulte, Mr. Eckert
spent over seven years with the public accounting firm of Arthur
Andersen LLP. Mr. Eckert is a former director of PHM
Mortgage Company and the Celotex Corporation, and he is a
current director of the Munder Funds, a $7 billion mutual
fund group and Fieldstone Investment Corporation, a mortgage
banking company that
6
originates, securitizes, sells, and services residential
mortgages. Mr. Eckert is also a member of the Board of
Governors of the National Association of Real Estate Investment
Trusts (NAREIT).
Craig L. Fuller has served as a member of our Board of
Trustees since April 22, 1998. From November 1999 to
present, Mr. Fuller has served as President and Chief
Executive Officer of the National Association of Chain Drug
Stores. Prior to joining NACDS, Mr. Fuller held senior
positions in business and government, including from June 1996
to October 30, 1999, serving as a Managing Director of
Korn/ Ferry International, an executive recruiting firm. He
served for eight years in the White House as assistant to
President Reagan for Cabinet Affairs and as Chief of Staff to
Vice President Bush. President-Elect Bush named Mr. Fuller
the Co-Director of his Presidential transition team.
Mr. Fuller is also a director of the Stillwater Mining
Company and the U.S. Chamber of Commerce. He also serves as
Trustee Emeritus for the Kennedy Center.
Paul M. Higbee has served as a member of our Board of
Trustees since October 28, 2003. From September 2001 to
present, Mr. Higbee has been a partner of
Andersen & Company, LLC, a merchant banking firm
engaged in private equity investments and investment banking for
middle-market companies. Mr. Higbee has been an investment
banker for over 25 years. Prior to joining
Andersen & Company in 2001, from March 1996 to May
2001, he was a Managing Director at Deutsche Bank.
Mr. Higbee previously served as Managing Director and head
of the Industrial Group at PaineWebber, Managing Director and
head of the Energy Group at Drexel Burnham Lambert Group, Inc.,
and started his career at Shearson Loeb Rhoades.
William E. Hoglund has served as a member of our Board of
Trustees since February 11, 1998. From 1956 until his
retirement in 1994, Mr. Hoglund was employed by General
Motors Corporation. At the time of his retirement in 1994,
Mr. Hoglund was serving as an Executive Vice President and
member of the General Motors Corporation Board of Directors. His
previous assignments at General Motors Corporation included
serving as Corporate Comptroller, Chief Financial Officer,
President of Saturn, General Manager of the Pontiac Division,
and Group Executive for the Buick-Oldsmobile-Cadillac Group.
Currently, Mr. Hoglund is a director of the MeadWestvaco
Corporation and the Sloan Foundation.
David B. Kay is a new nominee for the Board of Trustees.
Mr. Kay is currently a Senior Advisor to the J.E. Robert
Companies, an international real estate investment and asset
management firm. From 2002 to December 2004, Mr. Kay was a
Managing Director and the Chief Financial Officer of J. E.
Robert Companies. Prior to joining J.E. Robert Companies, from
1990 to 2002, Mr. Kay was a partner at Arthur Andersen LLP,
most recently serving as the Managing Partner for its
Mid-Atlantic regions accounting, audit, and financial
outsourcing practices. Currently Mr. Kay serves on the
Board of Directors for Saul Centers, Inc. and Chevy Chase Bank
F.S.B. Mr. Kay is not related to our Chief Financial
Officer, David S. Kay.
R. Michael McCullough has served as a member of our
Board of Trustees since April 22, 1998. Mr. McCullough
was employed by Booz, Allen & Hamilton Inc. from 1965
through 1996. He was the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of
Booz, Allen & Hamilton Inc. from 1984 to 1992. From
1992 until his retirement in 1996, Mr. McCullough was the
Senior Chairman of Booz, Allen & Hamilton Inc.
Currently, Mr. McCullough is a Director of Watson Wyatt
Worldwide, Inc., Potomac Realty Trust, and National
Rehabilitation Hospital. Mr. McCullough was also Chairman
of the Suburban Hospital Foundation.
Robert M. Rosenthal has served as a member of our Board
of Trustees since February 11, 1998. Mr. Rosenthal has
been the Chairman of the Rosenthal Automotive Organization since
1954. Mr. Rosenthal has been involved in the automotive
industry for over 50 years and during that time has founded
more than 35 dealerships. He was a Director of the Metropolitan
Washington Airport Authority and First Virginia Bank. Rosenthal
Automotive is currently comprised of 15 dealerships located in
the greater Washington, D.C. metropolitan area. Rosenthal
Automotive Organization has received numerous awards including a
Time magazine Quality Dealer Award and the Dealer of
Distinction from Sports Illustrated and the American
International Automobile Dealer Association. He has served as
past President of the Washington Area New Automobile Dealers
Association.
Vincent A. Sheehy has served as a member of our Board of
Trustees since April 22, 1998. Mr. Sheehy has been the
President of Sheehy Auto Stores since July 1, 1998. From
1991 to the present, Mr. Sheehy has owned and/or acted as
General Manager or President of various Sheehy dealerships.
Mr. Sheehy is a member
7
of the Nissan Dealer Product Committee. Mr. Sheehy is a
Director of the Virginia Automobile Dealers Association and
Chairman Emeritus of the Washington Area New Automobile Dealers
Association. He also serves on the Virginia Motor Vehicle Dealer
Board.
Corporate Governance
General. We are currently managed by a nine-member Board
of Trustees. The Board has adopted a set of corporate governance
guidelines, which, along with the written charters for our Board
committees described below, provide the framework for the
Boards governance of Capital Automotive. Our corporate
governance guidelines are available on our website at
www.capitalautomotive.com, and are available in print to any
shareholder who requests them.
Independence and Composition. Our Amended and Restated
Declaration of Trust, as amended, which we refer to as the
Declaration, and the National Association of Securities Dealers
listing standards, which we refer to as the NASD listing
standards, each require that a majority of our Board of Trustees
are independent, as that term is defined in our
Declaration and the NASD listing standards.
The Board of Trustees, upon the recommendation of the Nominating
and Corporate Governance Committee (the Nominating
Committee), has determined that Messrs. Fuller,
Higbee, Hoglund, Kay, McCullough, Pohanka and Sheehy,
representing a majority of our Board of Trustees, are
independent as that term is defined in the NASD
listing standards and our Declaration.
Meetings and Attendance. The Board of Trustees met eight
times in the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004. Each of
the current nominees currently serving on the Board of Trustees
attended at least 75% of the aggregate of the total number of
meetings of (i) the Board of Trustees and (ii) the
committees of the Board of Trustees that he was eligible to
attend. Our corporate governance guidelines provide that it is
the responsibility of individual Trustees to make themselves
available on a consistent basis to attend scheduled and special
Board meetings as well as the annual shareholder meeting. All of
our nine Trustees as of May 11, 2004 attended the 2004
annual shareholder meeting. In addition, non-management members
of the Board of Trustees met in executive session four times in
the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004. Pursuant to our
corporate governance guidelines, Mr. Pohanka presides over
these executive sessions.
Shareholder Communications. The Board of Trustees has
adopted a process whereby our shareholders can send
communication to us. This process is described in detail on our
website at www.capitalautomotive.com.
General. The Board of Trustees has established an Audit
Committee, which is governed by a written charter, a copy of
which is available on our website at www.capitalautomotive.com,
and is available in print to any shareholder who requests it.
Among the duties, powers and responsibilities of the Audit
Committee, as provided in the Audit Committee charter, are to:
|
|
|
|
|
have sole power and authority concerning the engagement and fees
of independent auditors; |
|
|
|
review with the independent auditors the plans and results of
the audit engagement; |
|
|
|
pre-approve all audit services and permitted non-audit services
provided by the independent auditors; |
|
|
|
review the independence of the independent auditors; |
|
|
|
review the adequacy of our internal control over financial
reporting; and |
|
|
|
review accounting, auditing and financial reporting matters with
our independent auditors and management. |
Meetings. The Audit Committee met 11 times in the fiscal
year ended December 31, 2004. In 2004, and currently
Messrs. Hoglund, McCullough and Sheehy are the members of
the Audit Committee, with Mr. McCullough serving as
Chairman. On February 17, 2005, the Board of Trustees
ratified the recommen-
8
dation of the Nominating Committee, and approved the following
Audit Committee assignments commencing on May 10, 2005:
Messrs. Hoglund, Kay, McCullough and Sheehy, with
Mr. McCullough serving as Chairman.
Independence and Composition. The composition of the
Audit Committee is subject to the independence and other
requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the
Exchange Act) and the rules and regulations
promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission
thereunder, and the NASD listing standards. The Board of
Trustees, ratified the recommendation of the Nominating
Committee, and determined that all current and nominated members
of the Audit Committee meet the audit committee composition
requirements of the Exchange Act and the NASD listing standards,
including but not limited to the requirement that all members of
the Audit Committee consist of independent members. The Board,
upon modification of the recommendation of the Nominating
Committee, also determined that Mr. David B. Kay is an
audit committee financial expert as that term is
defined in the Exchange Act.
|
|
|
Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee |
General. The Board of Trustees has established the
Nominating Committee, which is governed by a written charter, a
copy of which is available on our website at
www.capitalautomotive.com, and is available in print to any
shareholder who requests it. As provided in the Nominating
Committee charter, the Nominating Committee:
|
|
|
|
|
identifies and recommends to the Board of Trustees individuals
to stand for election and re-election to the Board at our annual
meeting of shareholders and to fill vacancies that may arise
from time to time; |
|
|
|
develops and makes recommendations to the Board for the creation
and ongoing review and revision of a set of effective corporate
governance principles that promote our competent and ethical
operation and a policy governing ethical business conduct of our
employees and Trustees; and |
|
|
|
makes recommendations to the Board of Trustees as to the
structure and membership of committees of the Board of Trustees. |
Selection of Trustee Nominees. Our corporate governance
guidelines provide that the Nominating Committee endeavor to
identify individuals to serve on the Board who have expertise
that is useful to us and complementary to the background, skills
and experience of other Board members. The Nominating
Committees assessment of the composition of the Board
includes: (a) skills business and management
experience, real estate experience, accounting experience,
finance and capital markets experience, and an understanding of
corporate governance regulations and public policy matters,
(b) characteristics ethical and moral standards,
leadership abilities, sound business judgment, independence and
innovative thought, and (c) composition
diversity, age and public-company experience. The principal
qualification for a Trustee is the ability to act in the best
interests of the Company and its shareholders.
The Nominating Committee considers Trustee nominees directly
recommended by shareholders. In accordance with the
Companys Second Amended and Restated Bylaws, as amended,
which we refer to as the Bylaws, and the Exchange Act, any
proposal from shareholders regarding possible Trustee candidates
to be elected at a future annual meeting must be received by
Capital Automotive REIT at 8270 Greensboro Drive,
Suite 950, McLean, Virginia 22102, Attn: Secretary and
General Counsel, not less than 120 calendar days before the date
of the Companys proxy statement released to our
shareholders in connection with the previous years annual
meeting of shareholders.
Please note that any shareholder nomination must comply with all
of the requirements of Rule 14a-8 under the Exchange Act,
which addresses when a company must include a shareholders
proposal in its proxy statement and identify the proposal in its
form of proxy for an annual or special meeting of the
shareholders. In addition, any proposals must include the
following:
|
|
|
|
|
the name and address of the shareholder submitting the proposal,
as it appears on our shareholder records, and of the beneficial
owner thereof; |
9
|
|
|
|
|
the number of each class of our common shares of beneficial
interest that are owned beneficially and of record by the
shareholder and the beneficial owner; |
|
|
|
a description of all arrangements or understandings between the
shareholder and the Trustee nominee and any other person
pursuant to which the nomination is to be made by the
shareholder; and |
|
|
|
all information relating to the Trustee nominee that is required
to be disclosed in solicitations of proxies for election of
Trustees in an election contest, or is otherwise required, in
each case pursuant to Regulation 14A under the Exchange Act
(including such persons written consent to being named in
the proxy statement as a Trustee nominee and to serving as a
Trustee if elected). |
The Nominating Committee will evaluate Trustee candidates
recommended by shareholders in the same manner that it evaluates
Trustee candidates recommended by our Trustees, management or
employees.
Independence and Composition. The NASD listing standards
require that the Nominating Committee consist solely of
independent Trustees. The Board of Trustees, upon the
recommendation of the Nominating Committee, has determined that
all current and nominated members of the Nominating Committee
are independent as that term is defined in the NASD
listing standards.
Meetings. The Nominating Committee met once during the
fiscal year ended December 31, 2004. In fiscal year 2004
and currently, Messrs. Anderson, Fuller, and Pohanka are
the members of the Nominating Committee, with Mr. Anderson
serving as Chairman. On February 17, 2005, the Board of
Trustees, upon the recommendation of the Nominating Committee,
approved the following Nominating Committee assignments
commencing on May 10, 2005: Messrs. Fuller, Hoglund
and Pohanka, with Mr. Hoglund serving as Chairman.
|
|
|
Executive Compensation Committee |
General. The Board of Trustees has established an
Executive Compensation Committee (the Compensation
Committee), which is governed by a written charter, a copy
of which is available on our website at
www.capitalautomotive.com, and is available in print to any
shareholder who requests it. The Compensation Committee is
responsible for:
|
|
|
|
|
approving and evaluating the compensation plans, policies and
programs for our executive officers and Trustees; |
|
|
|
approving all awards to any employees and Trustees under our
equity incentive plan; and |
|
|
|
evaluating the performance of the CEO and other executive
officers. |
Independence and Composition. The NASD listing standards
require that the Compensation Committee consist solely of
independent Trustees. The Board of Trustees, upon the
recommendation of the Nominating Committee, has determined that
all current and nominated members of the Compensation Committee
are independent as that term is defined in the NASD
listing standards.
Meetings. The Compensation Committee met three times in
the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004. In fiscal year
2004 and currently, Messrs. Fuller, Higbee and Hoglund are
members of the Compensation Committee, with Mr. Fuller
serving as Chairman. On February 17, 2005, the Board of
Trustees, upon modification of the recommendation of the
Nominating Committee, approved the following Compensation
Committee assignments commencing on May 10, 2005:
Messrs. Fuller and Higbee, with Mr. Fuller serving as
Chairman. Mr. Pohanka serves as a non-voting advisory
member.
Our Trustees, as well as our officers and employees, are also
governed by our code of business conduct, a copy of which is
available on our website at www.capitalautomotive.com, and is
available in print to any shareholder who requests it.
Amendments to, or waivers from, a provision of the code of
business conduct that applies to our Trustees or executive
officers will be posted to our website within five business days
following the date of the amendment or waiver.
10
Compensation of Trustees
We pay our Trustees who are not employees a $35,000 annual fee
for their services as Trustees. Each Trustee also is paid a
$1,000 fee for each Board meeting attended and a $500 fee for
each Committee meeting attended. The Chairman of the Board of
Trustees receives an additional $10,000 annual fee, and the
Chairman of the Audit Committee receives an additional $5,000
annual fee, each for their services as chairman. These fees are
all paid quarterly. In addition to cash compensation, the
Compensation Committee has expressed its intention that a
portion of annual Trustee compensation be in the form of equity.
Therefore, on January 19, 2005, under the Capital
Automotive Group Second Amended and Restated 1998 Equity
Incentive Plan, which we refer to as the Plan, the Compensation
Committee approved a grant of options to purchase 5,000
common shares to each non-employee Trustee. The exercise price
for these grants was $33.40, which was the fair market value of
the common shares on the date of the grant. One-third of the
options will vest on July 19, 2005, another one-third will
vest on January 19, 2006, and the remaining one-third will
vest on January 19, 2007. The options will be forfeited to
the extent they are not exercisable when a Trustee resigns or
fails to be re-elected as a Trustee.
In addition, under the Plan, upon election or appointment to the
Board of Trustees, each non-employee Trustee also receives an
initial grant of options to purchase 15,000 common shares.
The exercise price for these grants is equal to the fair market
value of the common shares on the date of grant. One-third of
the options will vest six months after the date of grant,
another one-third will vest on the first anniversary of the date
of grant, and the remaining one-third will vest on the second
anniversary of the date of grant. Options will be forfeited to
the extent they are not exercisable when a Trustee resigns or
fails to be re-elected as a Trustee.
We have also established a Deferred Compensation and Stock Plan
for Trustees, which permits non-employee Trustees to elect to
defer receipt of their annual retainer, meeting fees and
committee chairman fees. The deferred fees are credited to
either a cash or phantom share account or combination of both,
at the option of the Trustee. At the time specified in each
Trustees deferred fee agreement, amounts credited to a
cash account shall be paid in cash and phantom shares credited
to a Trustees phantom share account shall, at our option,
be (i) converted into common shares and issued to the
Trustee, or (ii) paid to the Trustee in cash in an amount
equal to the fair market value of the phantom shares. In 2004,
we did not distribute any amounts under this plan. The following
table sets forth fees deferred into common shares under the
Deferred Compensation and Stock Plan for Trustees in 2004:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of Common Shares Credited to Deferred Phantom Share Account | |
|
|
| |
Name |
|
During the Year Ended 12/31/2004 | |
|
Total (as of 12/31/04) | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
John E. Anderson
|
|
|
1,105 |
|
|
|
1,105 |
|
William E. Hoglund
|
|
|
1,211 |
|
|
|
1,211 |
|
John J. Pohanka
|
|
|
1,440 |
|
|
|
1,440 |
|
11
EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
The following table and biographical descriptions set forth the
name, age and principal occupations during the past five years
for each executive officer who is not also a Trustee. The
information is as of March 1, 2005, unless otherwise
indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name |
|
Age | |
|
Position |
|
|
| |
|
|
Lisa M. Clements
|
|
|
41 |
|
|
Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer |
Jay M. Ferriero
|
|
|
47 |
|
|
Senior Vice President and Director of Acquisitions |
David S. Kay
|
|
|
38 |
|
|
Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer |
John M. Weaver
|
|
|
45 |
|
|
Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary |
The executive officers are elected by the Board of Trustees and
hold office until their successors are elected and qualify.
Lisa M. Clements joined Capital Automotive in January
1998. Ms. Clements has been our Vice President, Controller
and Chief Accounting Officer since October 2003. Prior to such
time, Ms. Clements was our Vice President and Controller.
Ms. Clements is responsible for the Companys
financial reporting and compliance functions. Prior to joining
Capital Automotive, Ms. Clements had 12 years of
experience in financial reporting, including working for KPMG
Peat Marwick and holding several key accounting positions with
publicly traded companies.
Jay M. Ferriero joined Capital Automotive in February
1999. Mr. Ferriero has been our Senior Vice President and
Director of Acquisitions since February 2002. Prior to such
time, Mr. Ferriero was our Vice President and Director of
Acquisitions. Prior to joining Capital Automotive, from 1994 to
1999, Mr. Ferriero served as a First Vice President
Loan Group and National Accounts Manager at Comerica
Incorporated, a leading financial institution serving the
automotive retail industry. At Comerica, Mr. Ferriero was
responsible for managing the auto dealer lending offices and
clients in Florida and Illinois, and had nationwide
responsibilities for managing multi-bank credit facilities for
some of the largest auto dealer consolidators. From 1991 to
1994, Mr. Ferriero was Senior Vice President and Senior
Lending Officer at Comerica Bank & Trust, overseeing
all lending activities. Since 1980 and prior to 1991,
Mr. Ferrieros experiences included managing
commercial loan processing operations, managing loan reviews
associated with bank acquisitions, restructuring problem loans,
and originating commercial and auto dealership loans.
David S. Kay was one of the founders of Capital
Automotive in October 1997. Mr. Kay has been our Senior
Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer since
October 2003. Between February 2002 and October 2003,
Mr. Kay served as our Senior Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer. Prior to such time, Mr. Kay was our Vice
President and Chief Financial Officer. Prior to forming Capital
Automotive, Mr. Kay was employed by the public accounting
firm of Arthur Andersen LLP in Washington, D.C. for
approximately ten years. His areas of expertise included
emerging companies in the automotive, retail and distribution
industries. While at Arthur Andersen LLP, Mr. Kay provided
clients with consultation regarding mergers and acquisitions,
business planning and strategy, and equity financing. He also
has several years of experience in capital formation projects,
roll-up transactions and initial public offerings for motor
vehicle dealerships across the nation. Mr. Kay has
participated on a NADA task force and has given presentations at
NADA conventions, AICPA conferences and at other industry
seminars. Mr. Kay is an executive advisory board member of
the School of Accounting at James Madison University.
John M. Weaver joined Capital Automotive in July 1998.
Mr. Weaver has been our Senior Vice President, General
Counsel and Secretary since February 2002. Prior to such time,
Mr. Weaver was our Vice President, General Counsel and
Secretary. Prior to joining Capital Automotive, from 1991 to
July 1998, Mr. Weaver was a partner at Shaw Pittman LLP, a
Washington D.C.-based law firm where he concentrated on all
aspects of real estate and finance law and transactional
matters. As a member of Shaw Pittmans Real Estate Group,
nationally recognized for its work with REITs, Mr. Weaver
focused primarily on real estate developers, investors and
lenders. While at Shaw Pittman, Mr. Weaver had been
involved in a number of acquisitions and financings within the
REIT sector. Prior to joining Shaw Pittman, Mr. Weaver had
been an associate attorney in the Northern Virginia offices of a
predecessor to Reed, Smith, Hazel & Thomas.
12
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
Summary Compensation Table
The following table sets forth the compensation earned by our
Chief Executive Officer and each of the other most highly
compensated executive officers who were serving as executive
officers on December 31, 2004, who we collectively refer to
as the named officers.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-Term | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Compensation | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Awards | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Annual | |
|
|
|
| |
|
All Other | |
|
|
|
|
Compensation | |
|
Bonus | |
|
Restricted | |
|
Options | |
|
Compensations | |
Name and Principal Position |
|
Year | |
|
Salary ($) | |
|
($)(2) | |
|
Stock ($)(3) | |
|
(#shares) | |
|
($)(1) | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Thomas D. Eckert,
|
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
450,000 |
|
|
|
440,000 |
|
|
|
1,737,022 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
President and Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
2003 |
|
|
|
400,000 |
|
|
|
440,000 |
|
|
|
1,337,149 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2002 |
|
|
|
384,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
962,300 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
David S. Kay,
|
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
260,000 |
|
|
|
240,000 |
|
|
|
774,804 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and |
|
|
2003 |
|
|
|
208,000 |
|
|
|
240,000 |
|
|
|
624,859 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Treasurer |
|
|
2002 |
|
|
|
202,000 |
|
|
|
47,500 |
|
|
|
378,049 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
John M. Weaver,
|
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
230,000 |
|
|
|
200,000 |
|
|
|
662,343 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Vice President, General Counsel and |
|
|
2003 |
|
|
|
205,000 |
|
|
|
200,000 |
|
|
|
512,372 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Secretary |
|
|
2002 |
|
|
|
197,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
441,175 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jay M. Ferriero,
|
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
250,000 |
|
|
|
260,000 |
|
|
|
881,019 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Vice President and Director of Acquisitions |
|
|
2003 |
|
|
|
198,000 |
|
|
|
248,000 |
|
|
|
627,331 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2002 |
|
|
|
182,000 |
|
|
|
164,000 |
|
|
|
251,176 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lisa M. Clements,
|
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
125,000 |
|
|
|
120,000 |
|
|
|
287,432 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer |
|
|
2003 |
|
|
|
116,800 |
|
|
|
80,000 |
|
|
|
199,959 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2002 |
|
|
|
113,360 |
|
|
|
56,000 |
|
|
|
79,995 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
Other annual compensation for each named officer totaled less
than $50,000 and 10% of the total of annual salary and bonus
reported for such named officer. |
|
(2) |
Includes cash portion of annual bonus earned. See
Footnote 3 below for portion of executive officers
annual bonus used to purchase phantom shares. |
|
(3) |
Includes phantom shares credited in lieu of bonus and restricted
stock granted, both for performance in the year indicated. Since
annual performance of our officers usually cannot be measured
until the end of a year, the phantom shares and restricted stock
are typically granted in January of the following year. The
restricted stock and phantom shares shown as long-term
compensation for 2004, 2003 and 2002 was granted on
January 19, 2005, January 22, 2004 and
January 15, 2003, respectively. The grant of restricted
stock included in 2002 will vest on January 15, 2008,
except for Ms. Clements restricted stock, one-half of
which will vest on January 15, 2006 and the remaining half
will vest on January 15, 2008. The grant of restricted
stock included in 2003 will vest on January 22, 2009. The
grant of restricted stock included in 2004 will vest on
January 19, 2010. Prior to vesting, executive officers may
make a one-time election to defer receipt of the common shares
to a future date, provided that the deferred common shares will
be distributed to the employee prior to such time, upon the
occurrence of certain events, including a change in control of
the Company, certain terminations of employment and the
employees death and disability. A holder of restricted
stock does not have dispositive or voting power with respect to
the restricted stock, but does receive dividends paid on the
restricted stock. As presented in the table above, the dollar
value of the restricted stock awarded was calculated based on
the closing market price of the common shares on the Nasdaq
National Market on the date of award, net of the consideration
paid by the executive officers of $.01 per restricted share
awarded. |
|
|
Our Phantom Share Purchase Program requires mandatory and
authorizes voluntary purchases of phantom shares upon the
deferral of a portion of the executive officers annual
bonus. Under this program, unless otherwise approved by the
Compensation Committee, 20% of any annual bonus otherwise
payable to an executive officer must be deferred under the
Program and the executive officer may elect to defer up to an
additional 30% of any annual bonus otherwise payable to him or
her. The phantom shares are credited at a price equal to 80% of
the fair market value of our common shares on the date of grant.
The phantom shares awarded upon the deferral of a portion of
annual bonuses generally are paid on the third anniversary from
the date of grant. On such date, the phantom shares will be paid
to the employee in the form of common shares or, if mutually
agreed to between the employee and us, cash. Notwithstanding the
foregoing, certain employees can elect to defer payment of the
phantom shares to either (i) a later date or (ii) the
date the employee terminates employment with the Company or the
first January 15 following termination of employment. If the
employees employment with the Company is terminated before
the payment date, the employee will be paid the lesser of
(i) the amount of the annual bonus deferred or (ii) an
amount equal to the number of the phantom shares multiplied by
the fair market value of the common shares underlying the
phantom shares on the termination date. A holder of phantom
shares does not have dispositive or voting power with respect to
the phantom shares. However, a holder of phantom shares receives
dividend equivalents with respect to the phantom shares that are
equal to the value of any dividends paid with respect to our
common shares. As presented in the table above, the dollar value
of the phantom shares awarded upon the deferral of a portion of
annual bonuses was calculated based on the closing market price
of the common shares on the Nasdaq National Market on the date
of award. |
13
|
|
|
The following table lists the number and dollar value of the
restricted stock and phantom shares held by the named officers
(excluding restricted stock and phantom shares acquired upon
deferral of dividend equivalents, or restricted stock that the
person has agreed to defer receipt of until a later date
pursuant to a written agreement with us) as of December 31,
2004, including 118,263 restricted shares and 11,791 phantom
shares granted to executive officers in January 2005 for
performance in 2004. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted Shares | |
|
Phantom Shares | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
Number (#) | |
|
Value ($)* | |
|
Number (#) | |
|
Value ($)* | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Mr. Eckert
|
|
|
148,901 |
|
|
|
5,288,964 |
|
|
|
95,196 |
|
|
|
3,382,314 |
|
Mr. Kay
|
|
|
61,982 |
|
|
|
2,201,601 |
|
|
|
15,754 |
|
|
|
559,740 |
|
Mr. Weaver
|
|
|
55,795 |
|
|
|
1,981,838 |
|
|
|
31,912 |
|
|
|
1,133,833 |
|
Mr. Ferriero
|
|
|
64,015 |
|
|
|
2,273,813 |
|
|
|
9,917 |
|
|
|
352,351 |
|
Ms. Clements
|
|
|
18,481 |
|
|
|
656,445 |
|
|
|
4,372 |
|
|
|
155,337 |
|
|
|
* |
The dollar value of the restricted shares and phantom shares was
calculated based on the closing market price of the common
shares on the Nasdaq National Market on December 31, 2004
of $35.53, net of consideration paid by each executive officer
with respect to the restricted shares totaling $.01 per
restricted share awarded. |
|
|
|
The following table lists, for each named officer, the
percentage of such named officers annual bonus for 2004,
2003 and 2002 deferred towards the purchase of phantom shares
and the number of phantom shares actually purchased. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
Percentage of | |
|
Number of | |
|
Percentage of | |
|
Number of | |
|
Percentage of | |
|
Number of | |
|
|
Annual Bonus | |
|
Phantom Shares | |
|
Annual Bonus | |
|
Phantom Shares | |
|
Annual Bonus | |
|
Phantom Shares | |
|
|
Deferred (%) | |
|
Purchased (#) | |
|
Deferred (%) | |
|
Purchased (#) | |
|
Deferred (%) | |
|
Purchased (#) | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Mr. Eckert
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
4,117 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
4,061 |
|
|
|
100* |
* |
|
|
20,127 |
|
Mr. Kay
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
2,246 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
2,216 |
|
|
|
75* |
* |
|
|
7,752 |
|
Mr. Weaver
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
1,872 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
1,846 |
|
|
|
100* |
* |
|
|
10,499 |
|
Mr. Ferriero
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
2,433 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
2,289 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
2,231 |
|
Ms. Clements
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
1,123 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
739 |
|
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
1,306 |
|
|
|
** |
With the approval of the Executive Compensation Committee. |
14
Aggregated Option Exercises in Last Fiscal Year, and Fiscal
Year-End Share Option Values
The following table provides information regarding option
exercises in fiscal year 2004 by the executive officers and the
value of such officers unexercised options at
December 31, 2004. No options were granted to the executive
officers in fiscal year 2004.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of Securities | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Underlying Unexercised | |
|
Value of Unexercised | |
|
|
Shares | |
|
|
|
Options at | |
|
In-the-Money Options at | |
|
|
Acquired on | |
|
Value | |
|
Fiscal Year-End (#) | |
|
Fiscal Year-End ($) | |
Name |
|
Exercise (#) | |
|
Realized ($) | |
|
Exercisable/Unexercisable | |
|
Exercisable/Unexercisable (1) | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Thomas D. Eckert, President and Chief Executive Officer
|
|
|
528,002 |
|
|
|
8,222,845 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
David S. Kay, Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and
Treasurer
|
|
|
10,075 |
|
|
|
225,165 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
John M. Weaver, Senior Vice President, General Counsel and
Secretary
|
|
|
10,075 |
|
|
|
234,808 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
Jay M. Ferriero, Senior Vice President and Director of
Acquisitions
|
|
|
4,225 |
|
|
|
71,473 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
Lisa M. Clements, Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer
|
|
|
2,848 |
|
|
|
47,693 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
(1) |
Based on the closing market price of our common shares on the
Nasdaq National Market on December 31, 2004 of $35.53,
minus the respective exercise prices. |
Employment Agreements
The Partnership has entered into employment agreements with
Messrs. Eckert, Kay, Weaver, Ferriero and
Ms. Clements. Each agreement currently terminates on
January 1, 2007 and provides that the executive officer
agrees to devote his full business time to the operation of the
Partnership. Each employment agreement permits us to terminate
the executive officers employment with appropriate notice
for or without cause.
In general, cause is defined to include:
|
|
|
|
|
engaging in dishonesty relating materially to performance of
services or obligations contained in the employment agreement; |
|
|
|
conviction of, or pleading guilty or no contest to, any
misdemeanor (other than minor infractions) involving fraud,
breach of trust, misappropriation or other similar activity or
any felony; |
|
|
|
performance of duties in a grossly negligent manner; or |
|
|
|
willful breach of the employment agreement in a manner
materially injurious to us. |
In addition, executives may resign for good reason, which is
generally defined to include:
|
|
|
|
|
our failure to comply with such agreements material terms; |
|
|
|
the substantial diminution of responsibilities and duties or,
for Mr. Eckert, his involuntary departure from the Board of
Trustees; |
|
|
|
relocation of our headquarters outside the
Washington, D.C., metropolitan area; or |
|
|
|
a change of control. |
In general terms, a change of control occurs:
|
|
|
|
|
if a person, entity or group (with certain exceptions) acquires
more than 40% of our then-outstanding voting securities; |
|
|
|
if we merge into another entity (unless our prior shareholders
have at least 60% of the combined voting power of the securities
in the merged entity); or |
|
|
|
upon our shareholders approving our liquidation or dissolution
or upon the sale or disposition of substantially all of our
assets. |
15
Under the employment agreements, if an executive officers
employment ends for any reason, we will pay accrued salary,
bonuses already determined, and other existing obligations. If a
change of control occurs, we terminate the executive
officers employment without cause or the executive officer
resigns for good reason, all of the share options, restricted
shares and phantom shares held by the executive officer before
such event occurs will become fully vested, and we will be
obligated to pay the executive officer:
|
|
|
|
|
premiums for the period for group health coverage, if any, to
which the executive officer is entitled by law; and |
|
|
|
a pro rata annual bonus for the year of termination. |
If we terminate the executive officers employment without
cause or the executive officer resigns for good reason, we will
be obligated to pay the executive officer a lump-sum payment
equal to 24 months salary. If a change of control
occurs, we will be obligated to pay the executive officer a
lump-sum payment of three times the sum of the executive
officers annual salary plus the most recently established
target bonus.
If an employment agreement is not renewed by us on or before
January 1, 2007, and we at any time thereafter terminate an
executive officers employment without cause or the
executive officer resigns for good reason:
|
|
|
|
|
any unvested restricted shares granted prior to or during the
executive officers employment through January 1, 2007
and held by the executive officer before his termination of
employment will become vested to the extent of the ratio of the
number of days that the executive officer has been employed by
the Partnership or Capital Automotive since the date the
restricted shares were granted and the total number of days of
employment otherwise required for the restricted shares to fully
vest (determined separately for each grant); and |
|
|
|
any phantom shares granted prior to or during the executive
officers employment through January 1, 2007 and
credited to the executive officer before the executive
officers termination of employment will become vested to
the extent of the ratio of the number of days that the executive
officer had been employed by the Partnership or Capital
Automotive since the date the phantom shares were granted and
the total number of days of employment otherwise required for
the phantom shares to fully vest (determined separately to each
grant). |
While employed and for a two-year period after employment,
Messrs. Eckert, Kay, Weaver, Ferriero, and
Ms. Clements have agreed:
|
|
|
|
|
not to compete with us by working with or investing in any
enterprise that invests primarily in automobile dealerships or
automotive-related properties or that provides real estate
financing to automobile dealerships or automotive-related
businesses; and |
|
|
|
not to solicit or endeavor to entice away any of our employees,
consultants, contractors or subcontractors, or any lessee or
prospective lessee of our properties or properties we are
actively considering acquiring. |
16
Equity Compensation Plan Information
The following table provides information as of March 1,
2005 regarding equity compensation plans approved by the
shareholders and equity compensation plans that were not
approved by the shareholders.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of securities | |
|
|
Number of securities to | |
|
|
|
remaining available for future | |
|
|
be issued upon exercise of | |
|
Weighted average exercise | |
|
issuance (excluding securities | |
|
|
outstanding options, | |
|
price of outstanding options, | |
|
reflected in column (a) and | |
|
|
warrants and rights (2) | |
|
warrants and rights (2) | |
|
footnote (2)) | |
Plan category |
|
(a) | |
|
(b) | |
|
(c) | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders(1)
|
|
|
244,829 |
|
|
$ |
23.64 |
|
|
|
1,024,898 |
|
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
244,829 |
|
|
$ |
23.64 |
|
|
|
1,024,898 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
Consists entirely of common shares authorized for issuance under
the Plan. |
|
(2) |
Excludes 376,886 restricted shares, and excludes 146,821 common
shares that may be issued upon the payment of the phantom
shares. No exercise price is required to be paid upon the
vesting of restricted shares. |
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION COMMITTEE REPORT ON EXECUTIVE
COMPENSATION
Compensation Philosophy. The goal of the Executive
Compensation Committee (the Compensation Committee)
is to design and administer an executive compensation program to
(i) attract and retain qualified executive officers,
(ii) reward executive officers for superior performance in
achieving our business objectives and enhancing shareholder
value, (iii) align the executive officers interests
with those of the shareholders, and (iv) provide incentives
for the creation of long-term shareholder value. The key
elements of executive compensation are base salary, annual
incentive and performance bonuses, and share-based compensation
grants. The Compensation Committee reviews and approves our
policies and practices regarding executive compensation,
including (a) base salary levels, (b) incentive
compensation plans and related performance awards, and
(c) long-term equity incentives, including awards of
restricted shares, phantom shares and common share options. For
2004, the Compensation Committee placed significant emphasis on
forms of compensation designed to create a significant and
meaningful long-term incentive tied to our long-term growth,
financial success, and increasing shareholder value. Our
executives receive compensation for their services to both the
Partnership and Capital Automotive.
Base Salary Levels. We believe that our base salary
levels are reasonably related to the base salary levels of
executive officers of comparable real estate investment trusts
and other real estate companies. We set base salaries and
determined other compensation for 2004 based on those factors.
We also believe that the current base salary levels of our
executive officers take into account the unique talents and
skills of our executive officers. All executive officers
employment agreements have set floors on base salary and other
elements of compensation for their contract terms, but the
Compensation Committee can increase the base salary at any
point. We expect that any such increases will take into account
such factors as individual past performance, changes in
responsibilities, changes in pay levels of companies deemed
comparable by the Compensation Committee, and inflation. The
Compensation Committee, however, intends to reward executive
officers for their achievements primarily through bonus awards
and long-term incentive compensation, as discussed below.
Bonus Awards. We use performance bonuses to reflect the
level of involvement and success of our executive officers in
advancing corporate goals. The awards earned depend on the
extent to which our performance objectives and the
individuals performance objectives are achieved. Our
objectives consist of operating, strategic and financial goals
that are considered to be critical to our fundamental long-term
goal of building shareholder value. For fiscal year 2004, these
objectives were: (i) achievement of targeted Funds from
Operations (as defined below) per share; (ii) attainment of
a superior funds from operations multiple and total shareholder
return as compared to our peer group; (iii) effective
execution of our business strategy; (iv) continued
achievement of property acquisitions goals; and
(v) progress in certain financial and
17
administrative activities. In addition, we maintain a Phantom
Share Purchase Program (described in greater detail below),
under which executive officers defer a portion of their annual
bonuses through mandatory and voluntary purchases of phantom
shares. This program further aligns the executive officers
interests with those of the shareholders and provides incentives
for the creation of long-term shareholder value. The
Compensation Committee awarded $1,575,000 in bonuses to named
officers for fiscal year 2004, of which $315,000 was deferred
towards the purchase of phantom shares.
The National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts
(NAREIT) developed Funds from Operations, commonly referred
to as FFO, as a relative non-GAAP financial measure of
performance and liquidity of an equity REIT in order to
recognize that income-producing real estate historically has not
depreciated on the basis determined under accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States, commonly referred to as
GAAP. FFO, as defined under the revised definition adopted in
April 2002 by NAREIT and as presented by us, is net income,
computed in accordance with GAAP, plus depreciation and
amortization of assets unique to the real estate industry, plus
minority interest related to income from continuing operations
and income from discontinued operations, and excluding gains
from the sales of property, and after adjustments for
unconsolidated partnerships and joint ventures. FFO does not
represent cash flows from operating activities in accordance
with GAAP (which, unlike FFO, generally reflects all cash
effects of transactions and other events in the determination of
net income) and should not be considered an alternative to net
income as an indication of our performance or to cash flow as a
measure of liquidity or ability to make distributions. We
consider FFO a meaningful, additional measure of operating
performance because it primarily excludes the assumption that
the value of the real estate assets diminishes predictably over
time, which is contrary to what we believe occurs with our
assets, and because industry analysts have accepted it as a
performance measure. Comparison of our presentation of FFO,
using the NAREIT definition, to similarly titled measures for
other REITs may not necessarily be meaningful due to possible
differences in the application of the NAREIT definition used by
such REITs.
Long-Term Incentive Compensation. The Compensation
Committee believes that the use of equity incentives aligns the
interest of executive officers with those of shareholders and
promotes long-term shareholder value better than cash
compensation alone. The Capital Automotive Group Second Amended
and Restated 1998 Equity Incentive Plan, which we refer to as
the Plan, provides for grants to Plan participants, including
executives officers, of restricted shares, phantom shares, stock
appreciation rights, which we refer to as SARs, nonqualified
stock options, which we refer to as NQSOs, and incentive stock
options, which we refer to as ISOs. The Compensation Committee
administers the Plan and approves the awards granted to
participants, the type and terms of the awards, the schedule for
exercisability or non-forfeitability, the time and conditions
for expiration of the awards, and the form of payment upon
exercise. The Compensation Committee may make determinations
under the Plan that are not uniform as to the participants and
that may or may not consider whether participants are similarly
situated. The Compensation Committee will continue to look at
the total compensation package for each executive officer, and
the policies underlying our long-term compensation goals when
granting awards under the Plan.
The restricted share and phantom share grants for 2004
performance reflect our compensation philosophy of placing
greater emphasis on the long-term compensation component of the
compensation program. The Committee believes that such
restricted shares align the interests of the executive officers
with that of the shareholders by encouraging both share
appreciation and dividend growth while at the same time
promoting employee retention. On January 19, 2005, the
Compensation Committee awarded 118,263 restricted shares to
executive officers. These restricted shares will vest on
January 19, 2010. The Compensation Committee did not grant
SARs, NQSOs or ISOs to executive officers as part of the
long-term compensation earned for performance in fiscal year
2004.
In addition, we maintain a Phantom Share Purchase Program that,
unless the Compensation Committee determines otherwise, requires
mandatory and authorizes voluntary purchases of phantom shares
upon the deferral of a portion of an executive officers
annual bonus. Pursuant to this Program, 20% of any annual bonus
otherwise payable to an executive officer must be deferred under
the Program and the executive officer may elect to defer up to
an additional 30% of any annual bonus otherwise payable to him
or her. The phantom shares are purchased at a price equal to 80%
of the fair market value of our common shares on the
18
date of grant. Phantom shares generally are paid on the third
anniversary from the date of grant. Notwithstanding the
foregoing, certain employees can elect to defer payment of the
phantom shares to either (i) a later date or (ii) the
date the employee terminates employment with the Company or the
first January 15 following termination of employment. All of the
officers deferred 20% of their 2004 annual bonuses. On
January 19, 2005, 11,791 phantom shares were purchased by
executive officers under the program.
Compensation of the Chief Executive Officer. The
Compensation Committee uses the same procedures described above
in setting the annual salary, bonus and long-term incentive
compensation of the Chief Executive Officer. In 2004,
Mr. Eckert received a base salary of $450,000 and, as
described above, the Compensation Committee approved a 2004
bonus award of $550,000, 20% of which was deferred towards the
purchase of 4,117 phantom shares on January 19, 2005. The
Compensation Committee also approved the grant of 47,904
restricted shares to Mr. Eckert in January 2005 for
performance in 2004. In doing so, the Compensation Committee
considered our successful execution of performance goals, such
as achievement of superior growth of funds from operations as
compared to our peer group, and similarly, high total
shareholder return for the past one, three and five year periods
as compared to our peer group, and additional subjective factors
such as Mr. Eckerts conception and execution of a
successful strategic plan, continued success in acquiring a
solid portfolio of automotive dealership properties, maintaining
a stable and creditworthy tenant base and income stream,
retaining a team of highly-qualified professionals, as well as
maintaining overall shareholder confidence.
Compensation Deduction Limit. The Securities and Exchange
Commission requires that this report comment on our policy with
respect to a special rule under the tax laws,
Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986. That
section can limit the deductibility on a Subchapter C
corporations federal income tax return of compensation of
$1.0 million to any of the executive officers. Most public
companies are Subchapter C corporations, but we are not, so we
describe the difference below.
A company can deduct compensation (including from exercising
options) outside that limit if it pays the compensation under a
plan that its shareholders approve and that is
performance-related and non-discretionary. Option exercises are
typically deductible under such a plan if granted with exercise
prices at or above the market price when granted. The
Compensation Committees policy with respect to this
section is to make every reasonable effort to ensure that
compensation complies with Section 162(m), while
simultaneously providing our executives with the proper
incentives to remain with the Company. We note that
Section 162(m) does not affect the Company as directly as
it does Subchapter C corporations, because we do not ordinarily
pay taxes. Instead, if employees receive compensation under a
plan that does not comply with Section 162(m), we might not
be able to deduct all of the compensation income from those
purchases. That loss of deduction could increase the amount that
we must distribute to our shareholders, which might mean we
would need to borrow to make distributions. Given the way we
administer the incentive plan, we think it is unlikely that this
result will occur. We did not pay any compensation with respect
to 2004 that would be outside the limits of Section 162(m).
|
|
|
Executive Compensation Committee |
|
|
|
Craig L. Fuller, Chairman |
|
Paul M. Higbee |
|
William E. Hoglund |
|
|
|
March 4, 2005 |
Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider
Participation
No members of our Compensation Committee have ever been an
officer or employee of Capital Automotive or the Partnership.
19
AUDIT COMMITTEE REPORT
The information contained in this report shall not be deemed to
be soliciting material or to be filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC),
nor shall such information be incorporated by reference into any
previous or future filings under the Securities Act of 1933, as
amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,
except to the extent that we incorporate it by specific
reference.
Policy on Audit Committee Pre-Approval of Audit and
Permissible Non-Audit Services of Independent Auditor.
Consistent with SEC policies regarding auditor independence,
the Audit Committee has responsibility for appointing, setting
compensation and overseeing the work of the independent auditor.
In recognition of this responsibility, the Audit Committee has
established a policy to pre-approve all audit and permissible
non-audit services provided by the independent auditor.
Prior to engagement of the independent auditor for the next
years audit, management will submit to the Audit Committee
for approval an aggregate of services expected to be rendered
during that year for the services listed in the table located on
p. 4 above in the Fiscal 2004 and 2003 Audit Firm Fee
Summary.
Prior to engagement, the Audit Committee pre-approves these
services by types of service. The fees are budgeted and the
Audit Committee requires the independent auditor and management
to report actual fees versus the budget periodically throughout
the year by category of service. During the year, circumstances
may arise when it may become necessary to engage the independent
auditor for additional services not contemplated in the original
pre-approval. In those instances, the Audit Committee requires
specific pre-approval before engaging the independent auditor.
Pursuant to our Audit Committee Charter, the Audit Committee may
delegate, and has on occasion during 2004, delegated,
pre-approval authority to the chairman of the Audit Committee,
who shall promptly advise the remaining members of the Audit
Committee of such approval at the next regularly scheduled
meeting.
Review and Discussions with Management and the Independent
Auditor. The Audit Committee reviewed and discussed with
management and Ernst & Young LLP, our independent
auditor, our audited financial statements for the fiscal year
ended December 31, 2004, managements assessment of
the effectiveness of the companys internal control over
financial reporting and Ernst & Young LLPs
evaluation of the Companys internal control over financial
reporting. The Audit Committee has also discussed with
Ernst & Young LLP the matters required to be disclosed
by Statement on Auditing Standards (SAS) No. 61, as
amended by SAS No. 90, which includes, among other items,
matters related to the conduct of the audit of our financial
statements.
The Audit Committee has also received written disclosures and
the letter from Ernst & Young LLP required by
Independence Standards Board Standard No. 1, as amended
(which relates to the auditors independence from us), and
has discussed with Ernst & Young LLP their independence
from us. The Audit Committee has determined that the provision
of audit related and tax services by Ernst & Young LLP
during 2004 is compatible with maintaining Ernst &
Young LLPs independence.
Conclusion. Based on the review and discussions referred
to above, the Audit Committee recommended to the Board of
Trustees that our audited financial statements be included in
our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2004 for filing with the SEC.
|
|
|
Audit Committee |
|
|
|
R. Michael McCullough, Chairman |
|
William E. Hoglund |
|
Vincent A. Sheehy |
|
|
|
March 4, 2005 |
20
CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS
Since January 1, 2004, we or our subsidiaries, including
the Partnership and its subsidiaries, continued to be a party to
transactions described in the following paragraphs involving a
Trustee, an executive officer or a 5% or greater shareholder (on
a fully converted basis). Management believes that such
transactions were on terms that were materially no less
favorable than those that could have been obtained in comparable
transactions with unaffiliated parties. In the aggregate, these
related transactions accounted for approximately 6.5% of our
rental revenue (including any rental revenue reclassified to
discontinued operations) for the year ended December 31,
2004.
Trustees
John J. Pohanka. We continue to lease certain properties
to entities related to Mr. Pohanka and/or members of his
family, under leases entered into in 1998 and 1999, as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Annual Base Rent | |
Tenants (Dealerships) |
|
Location | |
|
(as of March 1, 2005) | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Pohanka Properties, Inc. and Pohanka Virginia Properties,
L.L.C., jointly and severally (the Chantilly Lease)
(1) (2) (3) (4)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Chevrolet and Acura)
|
|
|
Chantilly, VA |
|
|
$ |
839,549 |
|
|
|
(Lexus)
|
|
|
Chantilly, VA |
|
|
|
377,366 |
|
|
|
(Lexus Service Center)
|
|
|
Chantilly, VA |
|
|
|
689,035 |
|
Pohanka Virginia Properties, L.L.C. (the PVP Lease)
(1) (3) (5)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Cadillac, Hyundai, Nissan and Honda)
|
|
|
Fredericksburg, VA |
|
|
|
534,491 |
|
|
|
(Saturn)
|
|
|
Bowie, MD |
|
|
|
447,171 |
|
Pohanka Properties, Inc. (the PPI Lease) (1) (2) (6)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Saturn and Isuzu)
|
|
|
Marlow Heights, MD |
|
|
|
475,608 |
|
|
|
(Honda)
|
|
|
Marlow Heights, MD |
|
|
|
406,575 |
|
|
|
(Hyundai)
|
|
|
Marlow Heights, MD |
|
|
|
171,788 |
|
|
|
(Body Shop)
|
|
|
Marlow Heights, MD |
|
|
|
77,340 |
|
Pohanka of Salisbury, Inc. (7)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Nissan, Toyota, Honda, Hyundai, Mercedes-Benz and Mazda)
|
|
|
Salisbury, MD |
|
|
|
520,991 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
4,539,914 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
Each entity operating dealerships on the properties subject to
the Chantilly Lease, the PVP Lease and the PPI Lease guarantees
each of such leases. |
|
(2) |
Pohanka Properties, Inc. is owned by John J. Pohanka (11.1405%);
The John J. Pohanka Trust (7.4093%); Mr. Pohankas
children, Geoffrey P. Pohanka (36.3646%), Susan Pohanka Schantz
(28.5036%), and Brian C. Pohanka (.6632%); and his nephews,
Frank S. Pohanka III (11.1405%), Christopher C.
Pohanka (.5510%) and Steven D. Parker (4.2273%). |
|
(3) |
Pohanka Virginia Properties, L.L.C. is owned by John J. Pohanka
(4%); Mr. Pohankas children, Geoffrey P. Pohanka
(32%), Susan Pohanka Schantz (32%) and Brian C. Pohanka (10%);
and his nephews, Christopher Pohanka (12%) and Stephen D. Parker
(10%). |
|
(4) |
In January 2004, the Company funded approximately $4,500,000 to
a tenant affiliated with Mr. Pohanka to purchase a new
Lexus Service Center that had been constructed by the tenant at
a cost of $5,500,000 on land owned by a subsidiary of the
Company. In connection with this funding, the lease term for all
of the Chantilly properties with Pohanka affiliates was extended
for an additional 15 years. The Audit Committee and the
Board of Trustees approved the transaction in October 2003. The
funding was on substantially similar terms as would be entered
into with non-affiliated tenants. |
|
(5) |
Pohanka Properties, Inc. guarantees this lease. |
|
(6) |
Pohanka Virginia Properties, L.L.C. guarantees this lease. |
|
(7) |
Owned by Geoffrey P. Pohanka (24%) and unaffiliated persons
(76%). |
21
Robert M. Rosenthal. We continue to lease certain
properties to entities related to Mr. Rosenthal and/or
members of his family, under leases entered into in 1998, as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Annual Base Rent | |
Tenants (Dealerships) |
|
Location | |
|
(as of March 1, 2005) | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Geneva Enterprises, Inc. d/b/a Rosenthal Nissan/Mazda/ Infiniti
(1)
|
|
|
Tysons Corner, VA |
|
|
$ |
2,499,396 |
|
Geneva Enterprises, Inc. d/b/a Rosenthal Mazda (1)
|
|
|
Arlington, VA |
|
|
|
619,930 |
|
Geneva Enterprises, Inc. d/b/a Rosenthal Chevrolet/ Jeep/
Chrysler (includes Storage Lot) (1)
|
|
|
Arlington, VA |
|
|
|
561,835 |
|
Geneva Enterprises, Inc. d/b/a Rosenthal Honda (1)
|
|
|
Tysons Corner, VA |
|
|
|
510,536 |
|
Geneva Enterprises, Inc. d/b/a Rosenthal Jaguar (1)
|
|
|
Tysons Corner, VA |
|
|
|
510,524 |
|
Geneva Enterprises, Inc. d/b/a Geneva Management (Related
Business) (1)
|
|
|
Arlington, VA |
|
|
|
452,902 |
|
Geneva Enterprises, Inc. d/b/a Rosenthal Isuzu (1)(2)
|
|
|
Gaithersburg, MD |
|
|
|
448,739 |
|
Geneva Enterprises, Inc. d/b/a Nissan Gaithersburg (1)(2)
|
|
|
Gaithersburg, MD |
|
|
|
348,135 |
|
Geneva Enterprises, Inc. d/b/a Rosenthal Acura (1)(2)
|
|
|
Gaithersburg, MD |
|
|
|
328,152 |
|
Geneva Enterprises, Inc. d/b/a Rosenthal Chevrolet/ Jeep (1)
|
|
|
Arlington, VA |
|
|
|
311,996 |
|
Maryland Imported Cars, Inc. d/b/a Gaithersburg Mazda (3)(4)
|
|
|
Gaithersburg, MD |
|
|
|
259,758 |
|
Geneva Enterprises, Inc. d/b/a Rosenthal Honda (2-acre lot) (1)
|
|
|
Tysons Corner, VA |
|
|
|
178,533 |
|
Geneva Enterprises, Inc. d/b/a Rosenthal Honda (Body Shop) (1)
|
|
|
Tysons Corner, VA |
|
|
|
127,365 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
7,157,801 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
Owned by (1) Mr. Rosenthal (65.148%),
(2) Mr. Rosenthals spouse, Marion Rosenthal
(1.386%), (3) Mr. Rosenthals daughters, Brooke
E. Peterson, Jane R. Cafritz and Nancy L. Rosenthal (9.815%
each), and (4) certain employees of Rosenthal Automotive
Organization. |
|
(2) |
The Company consented to the sublease affecting a portion of
these properties in the fourth quarter of 2004. |
|
(3) |
Guaranteed by Geneva Enterprises, Inc., an affiliate of
Mr. Rosenthal. |
|
(4) |
Owned by (1) Mr. Rosenthal (51%), and (2) certain
employees of Rosenthal Automotive Organization. |
Vincent A. Sheehy. We continue to lease certain
properties to entities related to Mr. Sheehy, and members
of his family, as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Annual Base Rent | |
Tenants (Dealerships) |
|
Location | |
|
(as of March 1, 2005) | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Sheehy Ford of Springfield, Inc. (1)(3)
|
|
|
Springfield, VA |
|
|
$ |
710,357 |
|
Sheehy Waldorf, Inc. (2)(3)
|
|
|
Waldorf, MD |
|
|
|
383,296 |
|
Sheehy Ford, Inc. (1)(3)
|
|
|
Marlow Heights, MD |
|
|
|
274,387 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,368,040 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
Owned 100% by Sheehy Auto Stores, Inc., which is owned 24.84% by
Mr. Sheehys father, Vincent A. Sheehy, III,
18.08% by Mr. Sheehys mother, Helen Sheehy, 19.9% by
Mr. Sheehy, 8.93% by Mr. Sheehys brother, Paul
A. Sheehy, and 4.18% by Ann Sheehy Fowler,
Mr. Sheehys sister. Leases entered into in 1998. |
|
(2) |
Owned 100% by Sheehy Auto Stores, Inc. In August 2002, Sheehy
Waldorf, Inc. acquired the assets of a Nissan dealership that is
operated on a property we own in Waldorf, Maryland. In
connection with this acquisition, an existing lease for the
property dated August 19, 1999 was assumed by Sheehy
Waldorf, Inc. from another tenant of the Company. The Board of
Trustees approved the transaction. The assignment was on
substantially similar terms as would be entered into with
non-affiliated tenants. |
|
(3) |
Sheehy Waldorf, Inc. guaranties the Springfield, VA and the
Marlow Heights, MD leases, and Sheehy Ford of Springfield, Inc.
and Sheehy Ford, Inc. guarantee the Waldorf, MD lease. |
22
During the first quarter of 2004, we consented to the assignment
by Sheehy Auto Stores, Inc. of a lease to an unrelated
third-party assignee. The assignee has been the operator of the
dealership since we acquired the property in 1998. At the time
of the assignment, the annualized rental payments derived from
this lease totaled approximately $354,000. Because we approved
the new credit under the lease as assigned, this assignment
released Sheehy Auto Stores, Inc. of any liability under the
lease, including the payment of rent. The Audit Committee and
the Board of Trustees approved the transaction.
OTHER INFORMATION
Company Performance
The following graph compares the cumulative total shareholder
return on our common shares from December 31, 1999 through
December 31, 2004 with the cumulative total return of the
NAREIT Equity Total Return Index and the cumulative total return
of the Standard and Poors (S&P) 500 Index. Our common
share price and the price of the S&P 500 Index are published
daily. The NAREIT Equity Total Return Index is published monthly
and for purposes of this presentation was interpolated to
December 31, 1999.
The graph assumes an investment of $100 in each of Capital
Automotive REIT, the NAREIT Equity Total Return Index and the
S&P 500 Index on December 31, 1999. The comparison
assumes that all dividends are reinvested into additional common
shares during the holding period.
Comparison of Five-Year Cumulative Total Return among Capital
Automotive REIT,
The NAREIT Equity Total Return Index and The S&P 500
Index
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Index |
|
12/31/99 | |
|
12/31/00 | |
|
12/31/01 | |
|
12/31/02 | |
|
12/31/03 | |
|
12/31/04 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Capital Automotive REIT
|
|
|
100.00 |
|
|
|
126.05 |
|
|
|
193.97 |
|
|
|
247.10 |
|
|
|
353.79 |
|
|
|
414.80 |
|
NAREIT Equity Total Return Index |
|
|
100.00 |
|
|
|
126.37 |
|
|
|
143.97 |
|
|
|
149.47 |
|
|
|
204.98 |
|
|
|
269.70 |
|
S&P 500 Index
|
|
|
100.00 |
|
|
|
91.20 |
|
|
|
80.42 |
|
|
|
62.64 |
|
|
|
80.62 |
|
|
|
89.47 |
|
23
Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting
Compliance
Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
requires our Trustees and officers, and persons who beneficially
own more than ten percent of our common shares, to file initial
reports of ownership and reports of changes in ownership of our
common shares and derivative securities, including options for
shares, restricted shares, phantom shares and warrants, with the
Securities and Exchange Commission. Based on our records and
other information, we believe that our Trustees and executive
officers who are required to file reports under Section 16
reported all transactions on a timely basis during the fiscal
year ended December 31, 2004, except that
Form 4s were inadvertently filed one day late for
Messrs. Anderson, Hoglund and Pohanka to report trustee
deferred income received in the form of phantom shares on
August 2, 2004.
Proposals for the 2006 Annual Meeting
If you want to include a proposal in the proxy statement for our
2006 Annual Meeting, including a proposal relating to Trustee
nominations, send the proposal to Capital Automotive REIT at
8270 Greensboro Drive, Suite 950, McLean, Virginia 22102,
Attn: Secretary and General Counsel. Proposals must be received
on or before December 5, 2005 to be included in next
years proxy statement. Please note that proposals must
comply with all of the requirements of Rule 14a-8 under the
Exchange Act, as well as the requirements of our Declaration of
Trust and Bylaws. In addition, proposals relating to Trustee
nominations must comply with the policy of the Nominating
Committee set forth under the section captioned Board
of Trustees Corporate Governance
Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee
Selection of Trustee Nominees.
We, in our discretion, will be able to use proxies given to us
for next years meeting to vote for or against any
shareholder proposal that is not included in the proxy statement
unless the proposal is submitted to us on or before
February 18, 2006.
24
PROXY FOR THE ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS OF
CAPITAL AUTOMOTIVE REIT
THIS PROXY IS SOLICITED ON BEHALF OF THE
BOARD OF TRUSTEES AND MAY BE REVOKED PRIOR TO ITS EXERCISE
The undersigned shareholder(s) of Capital Automotive REIT (the Company) hereby appoints
Messrs. Thomas D. Eckert and David S. Kay, and each of them singly, as proxies, each with full
power of substitution, for and in the name of the undersigned at the Annual Meeting of Shareholders
of the Company to be held on May 10, 2005, and at any and all adjournments thereof, to vote all
common shares of said Company held of record by the undersigned on March 1, 2005, as if the
undersigned were present and voting the shares.
(TO BE SIGNED ON REVERSE SIDE)
Please date, sign and mail your
proxy card back as soon as possible!
Annual Meeting of Shareholders
CAPITAL AUTOMOTIVE REIT
May 10, 2005
Please Detach and Mail in the Envelope Provided
|
|
|
x
|
|
Please mark your
votes as in this
example. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FOR
all nominees
listed at right
except as indicated
to the contrary)
|
|
WITHHOLD
AUTHORITY
to vote for all
nominees
listed at right
|
|
Nominees:
|
|
Thomas D. Eckert
Craig L. Fuller
Paul M. Higbee
William E. Hoglund
David B. Kay
R. Michael McCullough
John J. Pohanka
Robert M. Rosenthal
Vincent A. Sheehy |
1.
|
|
Election
of
Trustees
|
|
o
|
|
o |
|
|
|
|
|
(INSTRUCTIONS: To withhold authority to vote for any
individual nominee, write the nominees name on the
space provided below.) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FOR
|
|
AGAINST
|
|
ABSTAIN |
2.
|
|
Ratification of the appointment of the accounting
firm of Ernst & Young LLP to serve as independent
auditors for Capital Automotive REIT for the
fiscal year ending December 31, 2005
|
|
o
|
|
o
|
|
o |
|
3.
|
|
The proxies are authorized to vote in their
discretion upon such other business as may
properly come before the meeting to the extent
permitted by law. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
THE COMMON SHARES REPRESENTED BY THIS PROXY WILL
BE VOTED IN THE MANNER DIRECTED. IN THE ABSENCE OF
ANY DIRECTION, THE SHARES WILL BE VOTED FOR EACH
NOMINEE NAMED IN PROPOSAL 1 AND FOR PROPOSAL 2,
AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROXIES DISCRETION ON
SUCH OTHER BUSINESS THAT MAY PROPERLY COME BEFORE
THE MEETING TO THE EXTENT PERMITTED BY LAW.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I PLAN TO ATTEND THE MEETING
o
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SIGNATURE
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dated:
|
|
|
|
, 2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SIGNATURE IF HELD JOINTLY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOTE: Please sign exactly as your name appears on this Proxy. When shares are jointly held, each
holder should sign. When signing as executor, administrator, attorney, trustee or guardian, please
give your full title as such. If the signer is a corporation, please sign full corporate name by
duly authorized officer, giving full title as such. If signer is a partnership, please sign in
partnership name by authorized person.