e10vk
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
Annual report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
For the year ended December 31, 2010
Commission file number 1-1396
EATON CORPORATION
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Ohio
|
|
34-0196300 |
|
|
|
(State or other jurisdiction of
|
|
(IRS Employer Identification Number) |
incorporation or organization) |
|
|
|
|
|
Eaton Center |
|
|
Cleveland, Ohio
|
|
44114-2584 |
|
|
|
(Address of principal executive offices)
|
|
(Zip code) |
(216) 523-5000
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
|
|
|
|
|
Name of each exchange on |
Title of each class |
|
which registered |
Common Share ($.50 par value)
|
|
The New York Stock Exchange |
|
|
The Chicago Stock Exchange |
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405
of the Securities Act. Yes þ No ¨
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13
or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes ¨ No þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months and (2)
has been subject to such filing requirements for the past ninety days. Yes þ
No ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months
(or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes
þ No ¨
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation
S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrants knowledge, in
definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K
or any amendment to this Form 10-K. ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated
filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large
accelerated filer, accelerated filer, and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act (Check one):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer þ
|
|
Accelerated filer ¨
|
|
Non-accelerated filer ¨
|
|
Smaller reporting company ¨ |
|
|
|
|
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
|
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of
the Act).
Yes ¨ No þ
The aggregate market value of Common Stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant as of June
30, 2010 was $11.0 billion.
As of January 31, 2011, there were 340.4 million Common Shares outstanding, as adjusted to give
effect to the two-for-one stock split as described in Item 1. Business.
Documents Incorporated By Reference
Portions of the Proxy Statement for the 2011 annual shareholders meeting are incorporated by
reference into Part III.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Part I
Item 1. Business.
Eaton Corporation is a diversified power management company with 2010 sales of $13.7 billion.
The Company is a global technology leader in electrical components and systems for power quality,
distribution and control; hydraulics components, systems and services for industrial and mobile
equipment; aerospace fuel, hydraulics and pneumatic systems for commercial and military use; and
truck and automotive drivetrain and powertrain systems for performance, fuel economy and safety.
Eaton has approximately 70,000 employees in over 50 countries and sells products to customers in
more than 150 countries.
Eaton electronically files or furnishes reports pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Exchange Act) to the United States Securities and Exchange
Commission (SEC), including annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current
reports on Form 8-K, and proxy and information statements, as well as any amendments to those
reports. As soon as reasonably practicable, these reports are available free of charge through the
Companys Internet web site at http://www.eaton.com. These filings are also accessible on the SECs
Internet web site at http://www.sec.gov.
On January 27, 2011, Eatons Board of Directors announced a two-for-one stock split of the
Companys common shares effective in the form of a 100% stock dividend. The record date for the
stock split was February 7, 2011, and the additional shares will be distributed on February 28,
2011. Accordingly, all per share amounts, average shares outstanding, shares outstanding, shares
repurchased and equity based compensation presented in the consolidated financial statements and
notes have been adjusted retroactively to reflect the stock split.
Shareholders equity has been retroactively adjusted to give effect to the
stock split for all periods presented by reclassifying the
par value of the additional shares issued in connection with the
stock split to Common shares from
Retained earnings and Capital in excess of par value.
In 2010, Eaton acquired businesses for combined net cash purchase prices of $222 million. The
Consolidated Statements of Income include the results of these businesses from the dates of the
transactions. These transactions are summarized below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Business |
|
Annual sales |
Acquired business |
|
Date of transaction |
|
segment |
|
(in millions) |
Chloride Phoenixtec Electronics
|
|
October 12,
|
|
Electrical
|
|
$25 for the |
A China-based manufacturer of uninterruptible power supply (UPS) systems.
Eaton acquired the
remaining shares to
increase its ownership
from 50% to 100%.
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
Rest of World
|
|
year ended September 30, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CopperLogic, Inc.
|
|
October 1,
|
|
Electrical
|
|
$35 for the |
A United States-based
manufacturer of electrical
and electromechanical
systems.
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
Americas
|
|
year ended September 30, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wright Line Holding, Inc.
|
|
August 25,
|
|
Electrical
|
|
$101 for the |
A United States provider
of customized enclosures,
rack systems, and air-flow
management systems to
store, power, and secure
mission-critical IT data
center electronics.
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
Americas
|
|
year ended June 30, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EMC Engineers, Inc.
|
|
July 15, 2010
|
|
Electrical
|
|
$24 for 2009 |
A United States energy
engineering and energy
services company that
delivers energy efficiency
solutions for a wide range
of governmental,
educational, commercial
and industrial facilities.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Americas |
|
|
On January 1, 2011, Eaton closed the acquisition of the Tuthill Coupling Group, a division of
the Tuthill Corporation. This business, located in the United States and France, manufactures
pneumatic and hydraulic quick coupling solutions and leak-free connectors used in industrial,
construction, mining, defense, energy and power applications. This business had sales of $35 for
the year ended November 30, 2010 and will be included in the Hydraulics business segment.
On January 20, 2011, Eaton reached an agreement to acquire ACTOM (Pty) Limiteds low-voltage
electrical business in South Africa. This business is a manufacturer and supplier of motor control
components, engineered electrical distribution systems, and uninterruptible power supply systems
and had sales of $58 for the year ended December 31, 2010. The terms of the agreement are subject
to regulatory approvals and other customary closing conditions. The acquisition is expected to
close during the first half of 2011. This business will be included in the Electrical Rest of World
segment.
Page 2
Business Segment Information
Information by business segment and geographic region regarding principal products, principal
markets, methods of distribution, net sales, operating profit and assets is presented in Note 14 of
the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements on pages 48 through 52. Additional information
regarding Eatons segments and business is presented below.
Electrical Americas and Electrical Rest of World
Principal methods of competition in these segments are performance of products and systems,
technology, customer service and support, and price. Eaton has a strong competitive position in
relation to many competitors in this segment and, with respect to many products, is considered
among the market leaders. In normal economic cycles, sales of these segments are historically
lower in the first quarter and higher in the third and fourth quarters of a year. In 2010, one
large distributor of electrical products represented 11% of the sales of the Electrical Americas
segment and two large distributors of electrical products represented 10% of the sales of the
Electrical Rest of World segment.
Hydraulics
Principal methods of competition in this segment are product performance, geographic coverage,
service and price. Eaton has a strong competitive position in relation to the many competitors in
this segment and, with respect to many products, is considered among the market leaders. Sales of
this segment are historically higher in the first and second quarters and lower in the third and
fourth quarters of the year.
Aerospace
Principal methods of competition in this segment are total cost of ownership, product and
system performance, quality, design engineering capabilities and timely delivery. Eaton has a
strong competitive position in relation to the many competitors in this segment and, with respect
to many products and platforms, is considered among the market leaders. In 2010, 11% of this
segments sales were made to one large manufacturer of aircraft.
Truck
Principal methods of competition in this segment are product performance, global service, and
price. Eaton has a strong competitive position in relation to the many competitors in this segment
and, with respect to many products, is considered among the market leaders. In 2010, 63% of this
segments sales were made to five large manufacturers of heavy-, medium-, and light-duty trucks and
off-highway vehicles.
Automotive
Principal methods of competition in this segment are product performance, global service, and
price. Eaton has a strong competitive position in relation to the many competitors in this segment
and, with respect to many products, is considered among the market leaders. Sales of this segment
historically are lower in the third quarter of the year as a result of the normal seasonal pattern
of automotive industry production. In 2010, 53% of this segments sales were made to five large
manufacturers of vehicles.
Information Concerning Eatons Business in General
Raw Materials
Eatons major requirements for raw materials include iron, steel, copper, nickel, aluminum,
brass, silver, lead, molybdenum, titanium, vanadium, rubber, plastic, electronic components, and
insulating materials. Materials are purchased in various forms, such as extrusions, castings,
powder metal, metal sheets and strips, forging billets, bar stock and plastic pellets. Raw
materials, as well as parts and other components, are purchased from many suppliers and, under
normal circumstances, the Company had no difficulty obtaining them. In 2010, prices increased for
many materials purchased by Eaton throughout the year. The Company mitigated these increases
through a variety of cost out projects. Eaton maintained appropriate levels of inventory to guard
against basic shortages, and did not experience any general availability constraints in 2010 with
the exception of electronic components. These shortages were caused by an industry-wide capacity
constraint. This constraint has eased throughout the year and Eaton successfully managed through
it with negligible impact.
Patents and Trademarks
Eaton considers its tradename and trademark to be significant value to its business as a
whole. The Companys products are marketed with a portfolio of patents, trademarks, licenses or
other forms of intellectual property that expire at various dates in the future. Eaton develops
and acquires new intellectual property on an ongoing basis and considers all
of its intellectual property to be valuable. Based on the broad scope of the Companys product
lines, management believes
Page 3
that the loss or expiration of any single intellectual property right
would not have a material effect on Eatons consolidated
financial statements or its business segments. The Companys policy is to file applications and
obtain patents for its new products including product modifications and improvements.
Order Backlog
Since a significant portion of open orders placed with Eaton by original equipment
manufacturers of trucks, off-highway vehicles and passenger cars are historically subject to
month-to-month releases by customers during each model year, these orders are not considered firm.
In measuring backlog orders, the Company includes only the amount of orders to which customers are
firmly committed. Using this criterion, total backlog at December 31, 2010 and 2009 was
approximately $3.2 billion and $2.7 billion, respectively. Backlog should not be relied upon as
being indicative of results of operations for future periods.
Research and Development
Research and development expenses (in millions) for new products and improvement of existing
products in 2010, 2009 and 2008 were $425, $395 and $417, respectively. Over the past five years,
the Company has invested approximately $1.9 billion in research and development.
Environmental Contingencies
Operations of the Company involve the use and disposal of certain substances regulated under
environmental protection laws. Eaton continues to modify certain processes on an ongoing, regular
basis in order to reduce the impact on the environment, including the reduction or elimination of
certain chemicals used in, and wastes generated from, operations. Compliance with federal, state
and local provisions which have been enacted or adopted regulating the discharge of materials into
the environment, or otherwise relating to the protection of the environment, are not expected to
have a material adverse effect upon earnings or the competitive position of the Company. Eatons
estimated capital expenditures for environmental control facilities are not expected to be material
for 2011 and 2012. Information regarding the Companys liabilities related to environmental matters
is presented in Note 7 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements on pages 36 through
37.
Foreign Operations
Financial information related to Eatons foreign operations is presented in Note 14 of the
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements on page 52. Information regarding risks that may
affect foreign operations is presented in Item 1A of this Form 10-K Report.
Item 1A. Risk Factors.
Among the risks that could materially adversely affect Eatons businesses, financial condition
or results of operations are the following:
Volatility of end markets that Eaton serves.
Eatons segment revenues, operating results and profitability have varied in the past and may
vary from quarter to quarter in the future. Profitability can be negatively impacted by volatility
in the end markets that Eaton serves. The Company has undertaken measures to reduce the impact of
this volatility through diversification of markets it serves and expansion of geographic regions in
which it operates. Future downturns in any of the markets could adversely affect the Companys
revenues, operating results and profitability.
Eatons operating results depend in part on continued successful research, development and
marketing of new and/or improved products and services, and there can be no assurance that Eaton
will continue to successfully introduce new products and services.
The success of new and improved products and services depends on their initial and continued
acceptance by Eatons customers. The Companys businesses are affected, to varying degrees, by
technological change and corresponding shifts in customer demand, which could result in
unpredictable product transitions or shortened life cycles. Eaton may experience difficulties or
delays in the research, development, production or marketing of new products and services which may
prevent Eaton from recouping or realizing a return on the investments required to bring new
products and services to market. The end result could be a negative impact on the Companys
operating results.
Page 4
Eatons operations depend on production facilities throughout the world, many of which are located
outside the United States and are subject to greater risks of disrupted production.
Eaton manages businesses with manufacturing facilities worldwide. In recent years, the
Companys operations outside the United States have increased significantly in relative size in
comparison to its total operations. The Companys manufacturing facilities and operations could be
disrupted by a natural disaster, or labor strike, war, political unrest, terrorist activity or
public health concerns. Some of Eatons non-United States manufacturing facilities also may be more
susceptible to economic and political upheaval than United States facilities. Any such disruption
could cause delays in shipments of products and the loss of sales and customers, and insurance
proceeds may not adequately compensate the Company for the losses.
Eatons substantial foreign sales subject it to economic risk as Eatons results of operations may
be adversely affected by changes in local government regulations and policies and foreign currency
fluctuations.
As noted above in Item 1 Foreign Operations, a significant portion of Eatons sales are to
customers outside the United States, and the Company expects sales in foreign markets to continue
to represent a significant portion of its total sales. Foreign sales and operations are subject to
changes in local government regulations and policies, including those related to tariffs and trade
barriers, investments, property ownership rights, taxation, exchange controls and repatriation of
earnings. Changes in the relative values of currencies occur from time to time and could affect
Eatons operating results. While the Company monitors exchange rate exposures and attempts to
reduce these exposures through hedging activities, these risks could adversely affect the Companys
operating results.
Eaton uses a variety of raw materials and components in its businesses, and significant shortages,
price increases, or supplier insolvencies could increase operating costs and adversely impact the
competitive positions of Eatons products.
Eatons major requirements for raw materials are described above in Item 1 Raw Materials.
Significant shortages could affect the prices Eatons businesses are charged and the competitive
position of their products and services, all of which could adversely affect the Companys results
of operations.
Further, Eatons suppliers of component parts may increase their prices in response to
increases in costs of raw materials that they use to manufacture component parts. As a result, the
Company may not be able to increase its prices commensurately with its increased costs.
Consequently, the Companys results of operations could be materially and adversely affected.
Finally, while Eaton carefully monitors the viability of each of its suppliers, the global
economic downturn has, and may continue to have, an adverse impact on Eatons suppliers liquidity
and solvency. Should one or more of material suppliers become insolvent, Eaton could be required
to pay increased prices for affected raw materials or components, or experience difficulty in
replacing the insolvent supplier, either of which could adversely affect Eatons results of
operations.
Eaton engages in acquisitions and joint ventures, and may encounter unexpected difficulties
identifying, pricing or integrating those businesses.
Eaton seeks to grow, in part, through strategic acquisitions and joint ventures, which are
intended to complement or expand the Companys businesses, and expects to continue to do so in the
future. The success of this strategy will depend on Eatons ability to identify, price, finance and
complete these transactions or arrangements. Success will also depend on the Companys ability to
integrate the businesses acquired in these transactions and to develop satisfactory working
arrangements with the Companys strategic partners in the joint ventures. Eaton may encounter
unexpected difficulties in completing and integrating acquisitions with Eatons existing
operations, and in managing strategic investments. Furthermore, the Company may not realize the
degree, or timing, of benefits Eaton anticipated when it first entered into a transaction. Any of
the foregoing could adversely affect the Companys business and results of operations.
Eaton may be unable to adequately protect its intellectual property rights, which could affect the
Companys ability to compete.
Protecting Eatons intellectual property rights is critical to its ability to compete and
succeed. The Company owns a large number of United States and foreign patents and patent
applications, as well as trademark and copyright registrations that are necessary, and contribute
significantly, to the preservation of Eatons competitive position in various markets. Although
management believes that the loss or expiration of any single intellectual property right would not
have a material effect on the results of operations or financial position of Eaton or its business
segments, there can be no assurance that any one, or more, of these patents and other intellectual
property will not be challenged, invalidated or circumvented by third parties. Eaton enters into
confidentiality and invention assignment agreements with the Companys employees, and into
non-disclosure agreements with Eatons suppliers and appropriate customers so as to limit access to
and disclosure of the Companys proprietary information. These measures may not suffice to deter
misappropriation or
independent third party development of similar technologies. Moreover, the protection provided
to Eatons intellectual
Page 5
property by the laws and courts of foreign nations may not be as
advantageous to Eaton as the remedies available under United States law.
Eaton is subject to litigation and environmental regulations that could adversely impact Eatons
businesses.
At any given time, Eaton may be subject to litigation, the disposition of which may have a
material adverse effect on the Companys businesses, financial condition or results of operations.
Information regarding the Companys current legal proceedings is presented in Note 7 of the Notes
to the Consolidated Financial Statements on page 36.
Eaton participates in markets that are competitive and Eatons results could be adversely impacted
by competitors actions.
Eatons businesses operate in competitive markets. The Company competes against other global
manufacturers and service providers on the basis of product performance, quality and price, in
addition to other factors. While Eatons product development and quality initiatives have been
competitive strengths in the past, actions by Eatons competitors could lead to downward pressure
on prices and/or a decline in the Companys market share, either of which could adversely affect
Eatons results.
Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments.
None.
Item 2. Properties.
Eatons world headquarters is located in Cleveland, Ohio. The Company maintains manufacturing
facilities at 216 locations in 31 countries. The Company is a lessee under a number of operating
leases for certain real properties and equipment, none of which is material to its operations.
Management believes that the existing manufacturing facilities are adequate for operations, and
these facilities are maintained in good condition.
Item 3. Legal Proceedings.
Information regarding the Companys current legal proceedings is presented in Note 7 of the
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements on page 36.
Item 4. (Removed and Reserved).
None.
Executive Officers of the Registrant
Information regarding executive officers of the Company is presented in Item 10 of this Form
10-K Report.
Part II
Item 5. Market for the Registrants Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer
Purchases of Equity Securities.
The Companys common shares are listed for trading on the New York and Chicago stock
exchanges. Information regarding cash dividends paid, and the high and low market price per common
share, for each quarter in 2010 and 2009 is presented in Quarterly Data on page 65. At December
31, 2010, there were 8,113 holders of record of the Companys common shares. Additionally, 17,463
current and former employees were shareholders through participation in the Eaton Savings Plan
(ESP), Eaton Personal Investment Plan (EPIP), and the Eaton Electrical de Puerto Rico Inc.
Retirement Savings Plan.
Information regarding equity compensation plans required by Regulation S-K Item 201(d) is
provided in Item 12 of this Form 10-K Report.
Item 6. Selected Financial Data.
Information regarding selected financial data is presented in the Ten-Year Consolidated
Financial Summary on page 66.
Page 6
Item 7. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations is
presented on pages 53 through 64.
Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk.
Information regarding market risk is presented in Market Risk Disclosure on pages 62 through
63.
Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.
The report of the independent registered public accounting firm, consolidated financial
statements, and notes to consolidated financial statements are presented on pages 14 through 52.
Information regarding selected quarterly financial information for 2010 and 2009 is presented
in Quarterly Data on page 65.
Item 9. Change in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure.
None.
Item 9A. Controls and Procedures.
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures Pursuant to SEC Rule 13a-15, an evaluation
was performed under the supervision and with the participation of Eatons management, including
Alexander M. Cutler Chairman and Chief Executive Officer; President; and Richard H. Fearon Vice
Chairman and Chief Financial and Planning Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation
of the Companys disclosure controls and procedures. Based on that evaluation, Eatons management
concluded that the Companys disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of December 31,
2010.
Disclosure controls and procedures are designed to ensure that information required to be
disclosed in Company reports filed or submitted under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed,
summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange
Commissions rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation,
controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in Company
reports filed under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to management, including the
Companys Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, to allow timely decisions regarding
required disclosure.
Pursuant to Section 404 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002 and the rules and regulations
adopted pursuant thereto, Eaton has included a report of managements assessment of the
effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, which is presented on page 17.
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm relating to internal control over
financial reporting as of December 31, 2010 is presented on page 16.
During the fourth quarter of 2010, there was no change in Eatons internal control over
financial reporting that materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, Eatons
internal control over financial reporting.
Item 9B. Other Information.
None.
Part III
Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance.
Information required with respect to the directors of the Company is set forth under the
caption Election of Directors in the Companys definitive Proxy Statement to be filed on or about
March 18, 2011, and is incorporated by reference.
A listing of the Companys executive officers, their ages, positions and offices held over the
past five years, as of February 1, 2011, follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name |
|
Age |
|
Position (Date elected to position) |
Alexander M. Cutler
|
|
|
59 |
|
|
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer; President (August 1, 2000 present)
Director (September 22, 1993 present) |
Page 7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name |
|
Age |
|
Position (Date elected to position) |
Richard H. Fearon
|
|
|
54 |
|
|
Vice Chairman and Chief Financial and Planning Officer (April 24, 2002 present) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Craig Arnold
|
|
|
50 |
|
|
Vice Chairman and Chief Operating Officer Industrial Sector (February 1, 2009 present)
Chief Executive Officer Fluid Power Group (October 25, 2000
January 31, 2009) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thomas S. Gross
|
|
|
56 |
|
|
Vice Chairman and Chief Operating Officer Electrical Sector (February 1, 2009
present)
President Power Quality and Control Business (April 1, 2008
January 31, 2009)
Vice President and President Power Quality Solutions Operations (May 16, 2005 March 31,
2008) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
James W. McGill
|
|
|
55 |
|
|
Executive Vice President Chief Human Resources Officer (January 1, 2010
present)
President Asia-Pacific Region (April 1, 2008 December 31, 2009)
Vice President Asia-Pacific (April 1, 2006 March 31, 2008)
Vice President Eaton Business System (July 29, 2004 March 31, 2006) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mark M. McGuire
|
|
|
53 |
|
|
Executive Vice President and General Counsel (December 1, 2005 present) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thomas E. Moran
|
|
|
46 |
|
|
Senior Vice President and Secretary (October 1, 2008 present)
Assistant Secretary and Managing Counsel, The Dow Chemical Company
(2002 2008) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Billie K. Rawot
|
|
|
59 |
|
|
Senior Vice President and Controller (March 1, 1991 present)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kurt B. McMaken
|
|
|
41 |
|
|
Senior Vice President Corporate Development and Treasury (February 1, 2009 present)
Vice President Corporate Development and Planning (January 1, 2008
January 31, 2009)
Director Corporate Planning (April 1, 2006 December 31, 2007)
Director Corporate Development (October 1, 2004
March 31, 2006) |
There are no family relationships among the officers listed, and there are no arrangements or
understandings pursuant to which any of them were elected as officers. All officers hold office for
one year and until their successors are elected and qualified, unless otherwise specified by the
Board of Directors; provided, however, that any officer is subject to removal with or without
cause, at any time, by a vote of a majority of the Board of Directors.
Information required with respect to compliance with Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act is set
forth under the caption Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance in the Companys
definitive Proxy Statement to be filed on or about March 18, 2011, and is incorporated by
reference.
The Company has adopted a Code of Ethics, which applies to the Directors, officers and
employees worldwide. This document is available on the Companys website at http://www.eaton.com.
There were no changes during fourth quarter 2010 to the procedures by which security holders
may recommend nominees to the Companys Board of Directors.
Information related to the Companys Audit Committee, and members of the Committee that are
financial experts, is set forth under the caption Board Committees Audit Committee in the
Companys definitive Proxy Statement to be filed on or about March 18, 2011, and is incorporated by
reference.
Item 11. Executive Compensation.
Information required with respect to executive compensation is set forth under the caption
Executive Compensation in the Companys definitive Proxy Statement to be filed on or about March
18, 2011, and is incorporated by reference.
Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related
Stockholder Matters.
Information required with respect to securities authorized for issuance under equity
compensation plans is set forth under the caption Equity Compensation Plans in the Companys
definitive Proxy Statement to be filed on or about March 18, 2011, and is incorporated by
reference.
Page 8
Information required with respect to security ownership of certain beneficial owners, is set
forth under the caption Share Ownership Tables in the Companys definitive Proxy Statement to be
filed on or about March 18, 2011, and is incorporated by reference.
Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence.
Information required with respect to certain relationships and related transactions is set
forth under the caption Review of Related Person Transactions in the Companys definitive Proxy
Statement to be filed on or about March 18, 2011, and is incorporated by reference.
Information required with respect to director independence is set forth under the caption
Director Independence in the Companys definitive Proxy Statement to be filed on or about March
18, 2011, and is incorporated by reference.
Item 14. Principal Accounting Fees and Services.
Information required with respect to principal accountant fees and services is set forth under
the caption Audit Committee Report in the Companys definitive Proxy Statement to be filed on or
about March 18, 2011, and is incorporated by reference.
Part IV
Item 15. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules.
|
|
(a) |
(1) The report of the independent registered public accounting firm, consolidated
financial statements and notes to consolidated financial statements are included in Item 8
above: |
|
|
|
|
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm Page 14 |
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Income Years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008 Page 18 |
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Balance Sheets December 31, 2010 and 2009 Page 19 |
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows Years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008 Page
20 |
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Shareholders Equity Years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and
2008 Pages 21 through 23 |
|
|
|
|
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements Pages 24 through 52 |
|
|
|
|
All other schedules for which provision is made in Regulation S-X of the SEC are not
required under the related instructions or are inapplicable and, therefore, have been
omitted. |
|
|
(3) |
|
Exhibits |
|
3 (i) |
|
Amended Articles of Incorporation (amended and restated as of April 24, 2008)
Incorporated by reference to the Form 10-Q Report for the three months ended March 31,
2008 |
|
|
3 (ii) |
|
Amended Regulations (amended and restated as of February 24, 2010)
Incorporated by reference to the Form 8-K Report dated February 24, 2010 |
|
|
4 (a) |
|
Pursuant to Regulation S-K Item 601(b) (4), the Company agrees to furnish to the
SEC, upon request, a copy of the instruments defining the rights of holders of its other
long-term debt |
|
|
10 |
|
Material contracts |
|
(a) |
|
Senior Executive Incentive Compensation Plan (effective
January 1, 2008) Incorporated by reference to the
definitive Proxy Statement dated March 14, 2008 |
|
|
(b) |
|
Executive Incentive Compensation Plan (effective January 1,
2005) Incorporated by reference to the Form 10-K Report for
the year ended December 31, 2005 |
|
|
(c) |
|
2005 Non-Employee Director Fee Deferral Plan (2008
restatement) Incorporated by reference to the Form 10-K
Report for the year ended December 31, 2007 |
Page 9
|
(d) |
|
Deferred Incentive Compensation Plan II (2008 restatement)
Incorporated by reference to the Form 10-K Report for the
year ended December 31, 2007 |
|
|
(e) |
|
Excess Benefits Plan II (2008 restatement) Incorporated by
reference to the Form 10-K Report for the year ended December
31, 2007 |
|
|
(f) |
|
Incentive Compensation Deferral Plan II (2008 restatement)
Incorporated by reference to the Form 10-K Report for the
year ended December 31, 2007 |
|
|
(g) |
|
Limited Eaton Service Supplemental Retirement Income Plan II
(2008 restatement) Incorporated by reference to the Form
10-K Report for the year ended December 31, 2007 |
|
|
(h) |
|
Supplemental Benefits Plan II (2008 restatement)
Incorporated by reference to the Form 10-K Report for the
year ended December 31, 2007 |
|
|
(i) |
|
Form of Restricted Share Unit Agreement (2 year vesting)
Incorporated by reference to the Form 10-K Report for the
year ended December 31, 2007 |
|
|
(j) |
|
Form of Restricted Share Unit Agreement (4 year vesting)
Incorporated by reference to the Form 10-K Report for the
year ended December 31, 2007 |
|
|
(k) |
|
Form of Restricted Share Agreement (2 year vesting)
Incorporated by reference to the Form 10-K Report for the
year ended December 31, 2007 |
|
|
(l) |
|
Form of Restricted Share Agreement (4 year vesting)
Incorporated by reference to the Form 10-K Report for the
year ended December 31, 2007 |
|
|
(m) |
|
Form of Restricted Share Agreement (Non-Employee Directors)
Incorporated by reference to the Form 8-K Report filed
February 1, 2010 |
|
|
(n) |
|
Form of Stock Option Agreement for Executives (2008)
Incorporated by reference to the Form 10-K Report for the
year ended December 31, 2007 |
|
|
(o) |
|
Form of Stock Option Agreement for Executives Incorporated
by reference to the Form 10-K Report for the year ended
December 31, 2006 |
|
|
(p) |
|
Form of Stock Option Agreement for Non-Employee Directors
(2008) Incorporated by reference to the Form 10-K Report
for the year ended December 31, 2007 |
|
|
(q) |
|
2002 Stock Plan Incorporated by reference to the definitive
Proxy Statement dated March 15, 2002 |
|
|
(r) |
|
2004 Stock Plan Incorporated by reference to the definitive
Proxy Statement dated March 19, 2004 |
|
|
(s) |
|
2008 Stock Plan Incorporated by reference to the definitive
Proxy Statement dated March 14, 2008 |
|
|
(t) |
|
2009 Stock Plan Incorporated by reference to the definitive
Proxy Statement dated March 13, 2009 |
|
|
(u) |
|
Plan for the Deferred Payment of Directors Fees (originally
adopted in 1985 and amended effective September 24, 1996,
January 28, 1998, January 23, 2002, February 24, 2004,
December 8, 2004 and, in certain respects, January 1, 2005)
Incorporated by reference to the Form 10-K Report for the
year ended December 31, 2007 |
|
|
(v) |
|
1996 Non-Employee Director Fee Deferral Plan (amended and
restated effective January 1, 2005) Incorporated by
reference to the Form 10-K Report for the year ended December
31, 2006 |
|
|
(w) |
|
Form of Change of Control Agreement entered into with
officers of Eaton Corporation Incorporated by reference to
the Form 10-K Report for the year ended December 31, 2008 |
Page 10
|
(x) |
|
Form of Indemnification Agreement entered into with officers
of Eaton Corporation Incorporated by reference to the Form
10-K Report for the year ended December 31, 2002 |
|
|
(y) |
|
Form of Indemnification Agreement entered into with directors
of Eaton Corporation Incorporated by reference to the Form
8-K Report filed January 26, 2007 |
|
|
(z) |
|
Executive Strategic Incentive Plan (amended and restated
January 1, 2008) Incorporated by reference to the
definitive Proxy Statement dated March 14, 2008 |
|
|
(aa) |
|
Executive Strategic Incentive Plan II (effective January 1,
2001) Incorporated by reference to the Form 10-K Report for
the year ended December 31, 2002 |
|
|
(bb) |
|
Supplemental Executive Strategic Incentive Plan (effective as
of June 25, 2008) Incorporated by reference to the Form
10-K Report for the year ended December 31, 2008 |
|
|
(cc) |
|
Deferred Incentive Compensation Plan (amended and restated
effective November 1, 2007) Incorporated by reference to
the Form 10-K Report for the year ended December 31, 2009 |
|
|
(dd) |
|
1998 Stock Plan Incorporated by reference to the definitive
Proxy Statement dated March 13, 1998 |
|
|
(ee) |
|
Incentive Compensation Deferral Plan (amended and restated
October 1, 1997) Incorporated by reference to the Form 10-K
Report for the year ended December 31, 2000 |
|
|
(ff) |
|
Trust Agreement Officers and Employees (dated December 6,
1996) Incorporated by reference to the Form 10-K Report for
the year ended December 31, 2002 |
|
|
(gg) |
|
Trust Agreement Non-employee Directors (dated December 6,
1996) Incorporated by reference to the Form 10-K Report for
the year ended December 31, 2002 |
|
|
(hh) |
|
Group Replacement Insurance Plan (GRIP) (effective June 1,
1992) Incorporated by reference to the Form 10-K Report for
the year ended December 31, 1992 |
|
|
(ii) |
|
1991 Stock Option Plan Incorporated by reference to the
Form 10-K Report for the year ended December 31, 2002 |
|
|
(jj) |
|
Excess Benefits Plan (amended and restated effective January
1, 1989) Incorporated by reference to the Form 10-K Report
for the year ended December 31, 2002 |
|
|
(kk) |
|
Supplemental Benefits Plan (amended and restated January 1,
1989) Incorporated by reference to the Form 10-K Report for
the year ended December 31, 2002 |
|
|
(ll) |
|
Eaton Corporation Board of Directors Policy on Incentive
Compensation, Stock Options and Other Equity Grants upon the
Restatement of Financial Results Incorporated by reference
to the Form 10-K Report for the year ended December 31, 2007 |
|
|
(mm) |
|
Amended and Restated Grantor Trust Agreement for Non-Employee
Directors Deferred Fees Plans effective January 1, 2010 -
Filed in conjunction with this Form 10-K report* |
|
|
(nn) |
|
Amended and Restated Grantor Trust Agreement for Employees
Deferred Compensation Plans effective January 1, 2010 -
Filed in conjunction with this Form 10-K report* |
|
12 |
|
Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges Filed in conjunction with this Form 10-K Report * |
|
|
14 |
|
Code of Ethics Incorporated by reference to the definitive Proxy Statement filed on March 14, 2008 |
|
|
21 |
|
Subsidiaries of Eaton Corporation Filed in conjunction with this Form 10-K Report * |
|
|
23 |
|
Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm Filed in conjunction with
this Form 10-K Report * |
|
|
24 |
|
Power of Attorney Filed in conjunction with this Form 10-K Report * |
Page 11
|
31.1 |
|
Certification of Form 10-K (Pursuant to the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, Section 302)
Filed in conjunction with this Form 10-K Report * |
|
|
31.2 |
|
Certification of Form 10-K (Pursuant to the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, Section 302)
Filed in conjunction with this Form 10-K Report * |
|
|
32.1 |
|
Certification of Form 10-K (Pursuant to the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, Section 906)
Filed in conjunction with this Form 10-K Report * |
|
|
32.2 |
|
Certification of Form 10-K (Pursuant to the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, Section 906)
Filed in conjunction with this Form 10-K Report * |
|
|
101.INS XBRL Instance Document * |
|
|
101.SCH XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document * |
|
|
101.CAL XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document * |
|
|
101.DEF XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document * |
|
|
101.LAB XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document * |
|
|
101.PRE XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document * |
|
|
|
* |
|
Submitted electronically herewith. |
|
|
Attached as Exhibit 101 to this report are the following formatted in XBRL (Extensible
Business Reporting Language): (i) Consolidated Statements of Income for the years ended
December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008, (ii) Consolidated Balance Sheets at December 31, 2010 and
2009, (iii) Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009
and 2008 (iv) Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for the year ended December 31, 2010. |
|
|
|
In accordance with Rule 406T of Regulation S-T, the XBRL related information in Exhibit 101 to
this Annual Report on Form 10-K shall not be deemed to be filed for purposes of Section 18
of the Exchange Act, or otherwise subject to the liability of that section, and shall not be
part of any registration statement or other document filed under the Securities Act or the
Exchange Act, except as shall be expressly set forth by specific reference in such filing. |
|
(b) |
|
Exhibits |
|
|
|
Certain exhibits required by this portion of Item 15 are filed as a separate section of this
Form 10-K Report. |
Page 12
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto
duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Eaton Corporation
Registrant
|
|
Date: February 25, 2011 |
/s/ Richard H. Fearon
|
|
|
Richard H. Fearon |
|
|
Vice Chairman and Chief Financial and Planning Officer |
|
|
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been
signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the
date indicated.
Date: February 25, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Signature |
|
Title |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Alexander M. Cutler
|
|
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer; President; |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal Executive Officer; Director |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Billie K. Rawot
|
|
Senior Vice President and Controller; |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal Accounting Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
Todd M. Bluedorn
|
|
Director
|
|
Christopher M. Connor
|
|
Director |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
Michael J. Critelli
|
|
Director
|
|
Charles E. Golden
|
|
Director |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ernie Green
|
|
Director
|
|
Arthur E. Johnson
|
|
Director |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
Ned C. Lautenbach
|
|
Director
|
|
Deborah L. McCoy
|
|
Director |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* |
|
|
Gregory
R. Page
|
|
Director
|
|
Gary L. Tooker
|
|
Director |
|
|
|
|
|
*By
|
|
/s/ Richard H. Fearon
Richard H. Fearon, Attorney-in-Fact
|
|
|
|
|
for the officers and directors signing |
|
|
|
|
in the capacities indicated |
|
|
Page 13
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Board of Directors and Shareholders
Eaton Corporation
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Eaton Corporation as of December
31, 2010 and 2009, and the related consolidated statements of income, shareholders equity, and
cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2010. These financial
statements are the responsibility of the Companys management. Our responsibility is to express an
opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight
Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An
audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the
financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and
significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement
presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material
respects, the consolidated financial position of Eaton Corporation at December 31, 2010 and 2009,
and the consolidated results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the
period ended December 31, 2010, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight
Board (United States), Eaton Corporations internal control over financial reporting as of December
31, 2010, based on criteria established in Internal Control Integrated Framework issued by the
Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission and our report dated February 25,
2011 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.
|
|
|
/s/ Ernst & Young LLP
Cleveland, Ohio
|
|
|
February 25, 2011 |
|
|
Page 14
MANAGEMENTS REPORT ON FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
We have prepared the accompanying consolidated financial statements and related information of
Eaton Corporation included herein for the three years ended December 31, 2010. The primary
responsibility for the integrity of the financial information included in this annual report rests
with management. The financial information included in this annual report has been prepared in
accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States based on our best
estimates and judgments and giving due consideration to materiality. The opinion of Ernst & Young
LLP, Eatons independent registered public accounting firm, on those financial statements is
included herein.
Eaton has high standards of ethical business practices supported by the Eaton Code of Ethics and
corporate policies. Careful attention is given to selecting, training and developing personnel, to
ensure that managements objectives of establishing and maintaining adequate internal controls and
unbiased, uniform reporting standards are attained. Our policies and procedures provide reasonable
assurance that operations are conducted in conformity with applicable laws and with the Companys
commitment to a high standard of business conduct.
The Board of Directors pursues its responsibility for the quality of Eatons financial reporting
primarily through its Audit Committee, which is composed of five independent directors. The Audit
Committee meets regularly with management, the internal auditors and the independent registered
public accounting firm to ensure that they are meeting their responsibilities and to discuss
matters concerning accounting, control, audits and financial reporting. The internal auditors and
independent registered public accounting firm have full and free access to senior management and
the Audit Committee.
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Alexander M. Cutler
|
|
/s/ Richard H. Fearon
|
|
/s/ Billie K. Rawot |
|
|
|
|
|
Chairman and Chief Executive
|
|
Vice Chairman and Chief Financial
|
|
Senior Vice President |
Officer; President
|
|
and Planning Officer
|
|
and Controller |
|
|
|
|
|
February 25, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
Page 15
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Board of Directors and Shareholders
Eaton Corporation
We have audited Eaton Corporations internal control over financial reporting as of December 31,
2010, based on criteria established in Internal Control Integrated Framework issued by the
Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (the COSO criteria). Eaton
Corporations management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial
reporting, and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting
included in the accompanying Managements Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on the Companys internal control over financial reporting
based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight
Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was
maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal
control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and
evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk,
and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe
that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
A companys internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable
assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial
statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A
companys internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1)
pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the
transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that
transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance
with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company
are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company;
and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized
acquisition, use, or disposition of the companys assets that could have a material effect on the
financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or
detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are
subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that
the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
In our opinion, Eaton Corporation maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control
over financial reporting as of December 31, 2010, based on the COSO criteria.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight
Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheets of Eaton Corporation as of December 31, 2010
and 2009, and the related consolidated statements of income, shareholders equity, and cash flows
for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2010 and our report dated February 25,
2011 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.
|
|
|
/s/ Ernst & Young LLP
Cleveland, Ohio
|
|
|
February 25, 2011 |
|
|
Page 16
MANAGEMENTS REPORT ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING
The management of Eaton Corporation is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate
internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act rules 13a-15(f)).
Under the supervision and with the participation of Eatons management, including our principal
executive officer and principal financial officer, we conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness
of the Companys internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2010. In conducting
this evaluation, we used the framework set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of
the Treadway Commission in Internal Control Integrated Framework. Based on this evaluation under
the framework referred to above, management concluded that the Companys internal control over
financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2010.
The independent registered public accounting firm Ernst & Young LLP has issued an audit report on
the effectiveness of the Companys internal control over financial reporting as of December 31,
2010. This report is included herein.
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Alexander M. Cutler
|
|
/s/ Richard H. Fearon
|
|
/s/ Billie K. Rawot |
|
|
|
|
|
Chairman and Chief Executive
|
|
Vice Chairman and Chief Financial
|
|
Senior Vice President |
Officer; President
|
|
and Planning Officer
|
|
and Controller |
February 25, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
Page 17
EATON CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31 |
|
(In millions except for per share data) |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Net sales |
|
$ |
13,715 |
|
|
$ |
11,873 |
|
|
$ |
15,376 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of products sold |
|
|
9,633 |
|
|
|
8,782 |
|
|
|
11,191 |
|
Selling and administrative expense |
|
|
2,486 |
|
|
|
2,252 |
|
|
|
2,513 |
|
Research and development expense |
|
|
425 |
|
|
|
395 |
|
|
|
417 |
|
Interest expense-net |
|
|
136 |
|
|
|
150 |
|
|
|
157 |
|
Other (income) expense-net |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(9 |
) |
|
|
(42 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations before income taxes |
|
|
1,036 |
|
|
|
303 |
|
|
|
1,140 |
|
Income tax expense (benefit) |
|
|
99 |
|
|
|
(82 |
) |
|
|
73 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations |
|
|
937 |
|
|
|
385 |
|
|
|
1,067 |
|
Income from discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
937 |
|
|
|
385 |
|
|
|
1,070 |
|
Less net income for noncontrolling interests |
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
(12 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to Eaton common shareholders |
|
$ |
929 |
|
|
$ |
383 |
|
|
$ |
1,058 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per common share diluted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing operations |
|
$ |
2.73 |
|
|
$ |
1.14 |
|
|
$ |
3.25 |
|
Discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.01 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
2.73 |
|
|
$ |
1.14 |
|
|
$ |
3.26 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per common share basic |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing operations |
|
$ |
2.76 |
|
|
$ |
1.16 |
|
|
$ |
3.29 |
|
Discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.01 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
2.76 |
|
|
$ |
1.16 |
|
|
$ |
3.30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average number of common shares outstanding |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
|
339.5 |
|
|
|
335.8 |
|
|
|
324.6 |
|
Basic |
|
|
335.5 |
|
|
|
332.7 |
|
|
|
320.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash dividends paid per common share |
|
$ |
1.08 |
|
|
$ |
1.00 |
|
|
$ |
1.00 |
|
Net income per common share, weighted-average number of common shares outstanding and cash
dividends paid per common share have been restated to give effect to the two-for-one stock split. See Note 1 for additional information.
The notes on pages 24 to 52 are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.
Page 18
EATON CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31 |
|
(In millions) |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash |
|
$ |
333 |
|
|
$ |
340 |
|
Short-term investments |
|
|
838 |
|
|
|
433 |
|
Accounts receivable-net |
|
|
2,239 |
|
|
|
1,899 |
|
Inventory |
|
|
1,564 |
|
|
|
1,326 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
303 |
|
|
|
377 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
|
|
229 |
|
|
|
149 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
5,506 |
|
|
|
4,524 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Land and buildings |
|
|
1,494 |
|
|
|
1,459 |
|
Machinery and equipment |
|
|
4,485 |
|
|
|
4,241 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross property, plant and equipment |
|
|
5,979 |
|
|
|
5,700 |
|
Accumulated depreciation |
|
|
(3,502 |
) |
|
|
(3,255 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net property, plant and equipment |
|
|
2,477 |
|
|
|
2,445 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other noncurrent assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill |
|
|
5,454 |
|
|
|
5,435 |
|
Other intangible assets |
|
|
2,272 |
|
|
|
2,441 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
1,001 |
|
|
|
973 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
542 |
|
|
|
464 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
17,252 |
|
|
$ |
16,282 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and shareholders equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term debt |
|
$ |
72 |
|
|
$ |
113 |
|
Current portion of long-term debt |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
Accounts payable |
|
|
1,408 |
|
|
|
1,057 |
|
Accrued compensation |
|
|
465 |
|
|
|
256 |
|
Other current liabilities |
|
|
1,284 |
|
|
|
1,258 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
3,233 |
|
|
|
2,689 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noncurrent liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
3,382 |
|
|
|
3,349 |
|
Pension liabilities |
|
|
1,429 |
|
|
|
1,586 |
|
Other postretirement benefits liabilities |
|
|
743 |
|
|
|
754 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
487 |
|
|
|
550 |
|
Other noncurrent liabilities |
|
|
575 |
|
|
|
536 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total noncurrent liabilities |
|
|
6,616 |
|
|
|
6,775 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common shares (339.9 million outstanding in 2010 and 332.3 million in 2009) |
|
|
170 |
|
|
|
166 |
|
Capital in excess of par value |
|
|
4,093 |
|
|
|
3,947 |
|
Retained earnings |
|
|
4,455 |
|
|
|
3,893 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
|
|
(1,348 |
) |
|
|
(1,208 |
) |
Deferred compensation plans |
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
(21 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Eaton shareholders equity |
|
|
7,362 |
|
|
|
6,777 |
|
Noncontrolling interests |
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total equity |
|
|
7,403 |
|
|
|
6,818 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and equity |
|
$ |
17,252 |
|
|
$ |
16,282 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The number of common shares outstanding, Common shares, Capital in
excess of par value and Retained earnings have been restated to give effect to the two-for-one stock split. See Note 1 for additional information.
The notes on pages 24 to 52 are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.
Page 19
EATON CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31 |
|
(In millions) |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Operating activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
937 |
|
|
$ |
385 |
|
|
$ |
1,070 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile to net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
551 |
|
|
|
573 |
|
|
|
571 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
(191 |
) |
|
|
(225 |
) |
Pension expense |
|
|
179 |
|
|
|
270 |
|
|
|
215 |
|
Contributions to pension plans |
|
|
(403 |
) |
|
|
(271 |
) |
|
|
(210 |
) |
Changes in working capital |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable-net |
|
|
(305 |
) |
|
|
440 |
|
|
|
128 |
|
Inventory |
|
|
(219 |
) |
|
|
292 |
|
|
|
118 |
|
Accounts payable |
|
|
322 |
|
|
|
(73 |
) |
|
|
(208 |
) |
Other-net |
|
|
194 |
|
|
|
(17 |
) |
|
|
(18 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
1,282 |
|
|
|
1,408 |
|
|
|
1,441 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures for property, plant and equipment |
|
|
(394 |
) |
|
|
(195 |
) |
|
|
(448 |
) |
Cash paid for acquisitions of businesses |
|
|
(222 |
) |
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
(2,807 |
) |
(Purchases) sales of short-term investments-net |
|
|
(392 |
) |
|
|
(64 |
) |
|
|
100 |
|
Other-net |
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
44 |
|
|
|
(35 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
|
(1,012 |
) |
|
|
(225 |
) |
|
|
(3,190 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Borrowings with original maturities of more than three months |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds |
|
|
55 |
|
|
|
558 |
|
|
|
1,656 |
|
Payments |
|
|
(65 |
) |
|
|
(887 |
) |
|
|
(984 |
) |
Borrowings with original maturities of less than
three months-net (primarily commercial paper) |
|
|
(37 |
) |
|
|
(424 |
) |
|
|
(5 |
) |
Cash dividends paid |
|
|
(363 |
) |
|
|
(334 |
) |
|
|
(320 |
) |
Sale of common shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,522 |
|
Exercise of employee stock options |
|
|
157 |
|
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
47 |
|
Purchase of common shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(100 |
) |
Other-net |
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities |
|
|
(261 |
) |
|
|
(1,061 |
) |
|
|
1,815 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of foreign exchange rate changes on cash |
|
|
(16 |
) |
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
(20 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total (decrease) increase in cash |
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
152 |
|
|
|
46 |
|
Cash at the beginning of the year |
|
|
340 |
|
|
|
188 |
|
|
|
142 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash at the end of the year |
|
$ |
333 |
|
|
$ |
340 |
|
|
$ |
188 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The notes on pages 24 to 52 are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.
Page 20
EATON CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital in |
|
|
|
|
|
|
other |
|
|
Deferred |
|
|
Eaton |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common shares |
|
|
excess of |
|
|
Retained |
|
|
comprehensive |
|
|
compensation |
|
|
shareholders |
|
|
Noncontrolling |
|
|
Total |
|
(In millions) |
|
Shares |
|
|
Dollars |
|
|
par value |
|
|
earnings |
|
|
loss |
|
|
plans |
|
|
equity |
|
|
interests |
|
|
equity |
|
Balance at January 1, 2008 |
|
|
292.0 |
|
|
$ |
146 |
|
|
$ |
2,290 |
|
|
$ |
3,184 |
|
|
$ |
(423 |
) |
|
$ |
(25 |
) |
|
$ |
5,172 |
|
|
$ |
59 |
|
|
$ |
5,231 |
|
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,058 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,058 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
1,070 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency translation and related
hedging instruments (net of income
tax benefit of $68) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(722 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(722 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(722 |
) |
Pensions (net of income tax benefit of $227) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(419 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(419 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(419 |
) |
Other postretirement benefits (net of income
tax expense of $31) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
49 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
49 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
49 |
|
Cash flow hedges (net of income tax benefit of $12) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(23 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(23 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(23 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,115 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,115 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(57 |
) |
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
(45 |
) |
Effects of changing retirement benefit plans
measurement date (net of income tax
benefit of $8) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11 |
) |
Cash dividends paid |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(320 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(320 |
) |
|
|
(13 |
) |
|
|
(333 |
) |
Issuance of shares under employee benefit
plans-net (net of income tax benefit of $16) |
|
|
3.4 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
109 |
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
111 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
111 |
|
Sale of shares |
|
|
37.4 |
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
1,503 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,522 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,522 |
|
Purchase of shares |
|
|
(2.8 |
) |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
(33 |
) |
|
|
(65 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(100 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(100 |
) |
Decrease in noncontrolling interests due to
sale of business |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2008 |
|
|
330.0 |
|
|
|
165 |
|
|
|
3,869 |
|
|
|
3,844 |
|
|
|
(1,538 |
) |
|
|
(23 |
) |
|
|
6,317 |
|
|
|
48 |
|
|
|
6,365 |
|
Page 21
EATON CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital in |
|
|
|
|
|
|
other |
|
|
Deferred |
|
|
Eaton |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common shares |
|
|
excess of |
|
|
Retained |
|
|
comprehensive |
|
|
compensation |
|
|
shareholders |
|
|
Noncontrolling |
|
|
Total |
|
(In millions) |
|
Shares |
|
|
Dollars |
|
|
par value |
|
|
earnings |
|
|
loss |
|
|
plans |
|
|
equity |
|
|
interests |
|
|
equity |
|
Balance at December 31, 2008 |
|
|
330.0 |
|
|
|
165 |
|
|
|
3,869 |
|
|
|
3,844 |
|
|
|
(1,538 |
) |
|
|
(23 |
) |
|
|
6,317 |
|
|
|
48 |
|
|
|
6,365 |
|
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
383 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
383 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
385 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency translation and related
hedging instruments (net of income
tax expense of $45) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
349 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
349 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
349 |
|
Pensions (net of income tax expense of $42) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
Other postretirement benefits (net of income
tax benefit of $14) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(56 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(56 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(56 |
) |
Cash flow hedges (net of income tax expense of $19) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
330 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
330 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
713 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
715 |
|
Cash dividends paid |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(334 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(334 |
) |
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
(339 |
) |
Issuance of shares under employee benefit
plans-net (net of income tax benefit of $3) |
|
|
2.3 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
78 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
81 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
81 |
|
Decrease in noncontrolling interests due to
sale of business |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2009 |
|
|
332.3 |
|
|
|
166 |
|
|
|
3,947 |
|
|
|
3,893 |
|
|
|
(1,208 |
) |
|
|
(21 |
) |
|
|
6,777 |
|
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
6,818 |
|
Page 22
EATON CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital in |
|
|
|
|
|
|
other |
|
|
Deferred |
|
|
Eaton |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common shares |
|
|
excess of |
|
|
Retained |
|
|
comprehensive |
|
|
compensation |
|
|
shareholders |
|
|
Noncontrolling |
|
|
Total |
|
(In millions) |
|
Shares |
|
|
Dollars |
|
|
par value |
|
|
earnings |
|
|
loss |
|
|
plans |
|
|
equity |
|
|
interests |
|
|
equity |
|
Balance at December 31, 2009 |
|
|
332.3 |
|
|
|
166 |
|
|
|
3,947 |
|
|
|
3,893 |
|
|
|
(1,208 |
) |
|
|
(21 |
) |
|
|
6,777 |
|
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
6,818 |
|
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
929 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
929 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
937 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency translation and related
hedging instruments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(78 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(78 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(78 |
) |
Pensions (net of income tax benefit of $30) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(61 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(61 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(61 |
) |
Other postretirement benefits (net of income
tax benefit of $4) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(140 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(140 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
789 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
797 |
|
Cash dividends paid |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(363 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(363 |
) |
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
(371 |
) |
Issuance of shares under employee benefit
plans-net (net of income tax expense of $3) |
|
|
7.6 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
146 |
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
159 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
159 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2010 |
|
|
339.9 |
|
|
$ |
170 |
|
|
$ |
4,093 |
|
|
$ |
4,455 |
|
|
$ |
(1,348 |
) |
|
$ |
(8 |
) |
|
$ |
7,362 |
|
|
$ |
41 |
|
|
$ |
7,403 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The number of common shares outstanding,
Common shares, Capital in excess of par value and Retained earnings have been restated to give effect to the two-for-one stock
split. See Note 1 for additional information.
The notes on pages 24 to 52 are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.
Page 23
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Amounts are in millions or shares unless indicated otherwise (per share data assume dilution).
Note 1. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
General Information
Eaton Corporation (Eaton or Company) is a diversified power management company with 2010 sales
of $13.7 billion. The Company is a global technology leader in electrical components and systems
for power quality, distribution and control; hydraulics components, systems and services for
industrial and mobile equipment; aerospace fuel, hydraulics and pneumatic systems for commercial
and military use; and truck and automotive drivetrain and powertrain systems for performance, fuel
economy and safety. Eaton has approximately 70,000 employees in over 50 countries, and sells
products to customers in more than 150 countries.
Preparation of the consolidated financial statements requires management to make estimates and
assumptions that affect amounts reported in the consolidated financial statements and notes. Actual
results could differ from these estimates. Management has evaluated subsequent events through the
date the consolidated financial statements were filed with the Securities Exchange Commission.
The consolidated financial statements include accounts of Eaton and all subsidiaries and other
controlled entities. Intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated. The equity
method of accounting is used for investments in associate companies where the Company has a 20% to
50% ownership interest. These associate companies are not material either individually, or in the
aggregate, to Eatons consolidated financial statements. Eaton does not have off-balance sheet
arrangements or financings with unconsolidated entities. In the ordinary course of business, the
Company leases certain real properties and equipment, as described in Note 7.
On January 27, 2011, Eatons Board of Directors announced a two-for-one stock split of the
Companys common shares effective in the form of a 100% stock dividend. The record date for the
stock split was February 7, 2011, and the additional shares will be distributed on February 28,
2011. Accordingly, all per share amounts, average shares outstanding, shares outstanding, shares
repurchased and equity based compensation presented in the consolidated financial statements and
notes have been adjusted retroactively to reflect the stock split. Shareholders equity has been retroactively adjusted to give effect
to the stock split for all periods presented by reclassifying
the par value of the additional shares issued in connection with the stock split
to Common shares from Retained earnings and Capital in excess of par
value.
Certain prior year amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current year presentation.
Foreign Currency Translation
The functional currency for subsidiaries outside the United States is primarily the local
currency. Financial statements for these subsidiaries are translated at year-end exchange rates as
to assets and liabilities and weighted-average exchange rates as to revenues and expenses. The
resulting translation adjustments are recognized in Accumulated other comprehensive loss. Gains and
losses related to foreign currency transactions are recognized in Other (income) expense-net.
Revenue Recognition
Sales of products are recognized when a sales agreement is in place, products have been
shipped to unaffiliated customers and title has transferred in accordance with shipping terms (FOB
shipping point, FOB destination or equivalent International Commercial (INCO) Terms), the selling
price is fixed and determinable and collectability is reasonably assured, all significant related
acts of performance have been completed, and no other significant uncertainties exist. Shipping and
handling costs billed to customers are included in Net sales and the related costs in Cost of
products sold. Although the majority of the sales agreements contain standard terms and conditions,
there are agreements that contain multiple elements or non-standard terms and conditions. As a
result, judgment is required to determine the appropriate accounting, including whether the
deliverables specified in these agreements should be treated as separate units of accounting for
recognition purposes, and, if so, how the sales price should be allocated among the elements and
when to recognize sales for each element. For delivered elements, sales are recognized only when
the delivered elements have standalone value, fair values of undelivered elements are known, there
are no uncertainties regarding customer acceptance, and there are no customer-negotiated refund or
return rights affecting the sales recognized for delivered elements. Sales for service contracts
generally are recognized as the services are provided.
Long-Lived Assets
Depreciation and amortization for property, plant and equipment, and intangible assets subject
to amortization, are generally computed by the straight-line method and included in Cost of
products sold, Selling and administrative expense, and Research and development expense, as
appropriate. Cost of buildings are depreciated generally over 40 years and
Page 24
machinery and equipment
over 3 to 10 years. At December 31, 2010, the weighted-average amortization period for intangible
assets subject to amortization was 18 years for patents and technology and 17 years for customer
relationships, primarily as a result of the long life of aircraft platforms. Software is generally
amortized over a period up to 7 years.
Long-lived assets, except goodwill and indefinite life intangible assets, are reviewed for
impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying amount may not be
recoverable. Upon indications of impairment, assets and liabilities are grouped at the lowest level
for which identifiable cash flows are largely independent of the cash flows of other assets and
liabilities. The asset group would be considered impaired when the estimated future net
undiscounted cash flows generated by the asset group are less than its carrying value. Determining
asset groups and underlying cash flows requires the use of significant judgment.
Goodwill and Indefinite Life Intangible Assets
Goodwill and indefinite life intangible assets are tested annually for impairment as of July 1
using a discounted cash flow model and other valuation techniques. Additionally, goodwill and
indefinite life intangible assets are evaluated for impairment whenever events or circumstances
indicate there may be a possible permanent loss of value.
Goodwill is tested for impairment at the reporting unit level, which is equivalent to Eatons
operating segments, and based on the net assets for each segment, including goodwill and intangible
assets. Goodwill is assigned to each operating segment, as this represents the lowest level that
constitutes a business and for which discrete financial information is available and is
the level which management regularly reviews the operating results. A discounted cash flow model is
used to estimate the fair value of each operating segment, which considers forecasted cash flows
discounted at an estimated weighted-average cost of capital. The Company selected the discounted
cash flow methodology as it believes that it is comparable to what would be used by market
participants. The forecasted cash flows are based on the Companys long-term operating plan, and a
terminal value is used to estimate the operating segments cash flows beyond the period covered by
the operating plan. The weighted-average cost of capital is an estimate of the overall after-tax
rate of return required by equity and debt market participants of a business enterprise. These
analyses require the exercise of significant judgments, including judgments about appropriate
discount rates, perpetual growth rates and the timing of expected future cash flows. Discount rate
assumptions are based on an assessment of the risk inherent in the future cash flows of the
respective operating segment. Sensitivity analyses are performed around these assumptions in order
to assess the reasonableness of the assumptions and the resulting estimated fair values.
Indefinite life intangible assets primarily consist of trademarks. The fair value of these
assets is determined using a royalty relief methodology similar to that employed when the
associated assets were acquired, but using updated estimates of future sales, cash flows and
profitability.
For 2010, the fair value of Eatons reporting units and indefinite life intangible assets
substantially exceeded the respective carrying values. For additional information about goodwill
and other intangible assets, see Note 4.
Derivative Financial Instruments and Hedging Activities
Eaton uses derivative financial instruments to manage the exposure to the volatility in raw
material costs, foreign currency and interest rates on certain debt instruments. These instruments
are marked to fair value. Changes in the fair value of derivative assets or liabilities (i.e.,
gains or losses) are recognized depending upon the type of hedging relationship and whether an
instrument has been designated as a hedge. For those instruments that qualify for hedge accounting,
Eaton designates the hedging instrument, based upon the exposure being hedged, as a cash flow
hedge, a fair value hedge, or a hedge of a net investment in a foreign operation. Changes in fair
value of these instruments that do not qualify for hedge accounting are recognized immediately in
net income. See Note 12 for additional information about hedges and derivative financial
instruments.
Warranty Accruals
Product warranty accruals are established at the time the related sale is recognized through a
charge to Cost of products sold. Warranty accrual estimates are based primarily on historical
warranty claim experience and specific customer contracts. Provisions for warranty accruals are
comprised of basic warranties for products sold, as well as accruals for product recalls and other
events when they are known and estimable. See Note 7 for additional information about warranty
accruals.
Asset Retirement Obligations
A conditional asset retirement obligation is recognized at fair value when incurred if the
fair value of the liability can be reasonably estimated. Uncertainty about the timing or method of
settlement of a conditional asset retirement obligation would be considered in the measurement of
the liability when sufficient information exists. Eaton believes that for substantially all of its
asset retirement obligations, there is an indeterminate settlement date because the range of time
Page 25
over which the Company may settle the obligation is unknown or cannot be estimated. A liability for
these obligations will be recognized when sufficient information is available to estimate fair
value.
Income Taxes
Deferred income tax assets and liabilities are determined based on the difference between the
financial statement and tax basis of the respective assets and liabilities, using enacted tax rates
in effect for the year when the differences are expected to reverse. Deferred income tax assets are
recognized for United States and non-United States income tax loss carryforwards and income tax
credit carryforwards. Judgment is required in determining and evaluating income tax provisions and
valuation allowances for deferred income tax assets. Eaton recognizes the income tax benefit from
an uncertain tax position only if it is more likely than not that the tax position will be
sustained on examination by taxing authorities, based on the technical merits of the position.
Eaton evaluates and adjusts these accruals based on changing facts and circumstances. Eaton
recognizes interest and penalties related to unrecognized income tax benefits in the provision for
income tax expense. The Company has accrued penalties in jurisdictions where they are automatically
applied to any deficiency, regardless of the merit of the position. For additional information
about income taxes, see Note 8.
Stock Options and Restricted Stock Units
Eaton recognizes equity-based compensation expense based on the grant date fair value of the
award over the period during which an employee is required to provide service in exchange for the
award. Stock options are granted with an exercise price equal to the closing market price of Eaton
common shares on the date of grant. The fair value of stock options is determined using a
Black-Scholes option-pricing model, which incorporates assumptions regarding the expected
volatility, the expected option life, the risk-free interest rate, and the expected dividend yield.
The fair value of restricted stock units is based on the closing market price of Eaton common
stock on the grant date. See Note 10 for additional information about stock options and restricted
stock units.
New Accounting Standards
In 2009, the FASB issued a revised standard for accounting and disclosures of revenues related
to arrangements with customers to provide multiple products and services at different points in
time or over different time periods. This standard is effective for 2011. The adoption of this
standard is not expected to have a material effect on Eatons consolidated financial statements.
Note 2. ACQUISITIONS OF BUSINESSES
Eaton acquired businesses and entered into joint ventures in separate transactions for
combined net cash purchase prices of $222 in 2010, $10 in 2009, and $2,807 in 2008. The
Consolidated Statements of Income include the results of these businesses from the dates of the
transactions or formation. These transactions are summarized below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Business |
|
Annual |
Acquired business |
|
Date of transaction |
|
segment |
|
sales |
Chloride Phoenixtec Electronics
A China-based manufacturer of uninterruptible power
supply (UPS) systems. Eaton acquired the remaining
shares to increase its ownership from 50% to 100%.
|
|
October 12,
2010
|
|
Electrical
Rest of World
|
|
$25 for the
year ended September 30, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CopperLogic, Inc.
A United States-based manufacturer of electrical and
electromechanical systems.
|
|
October 1,
2010
|
|
Electrical
Americas
|
|
$35 for the
year ended September 30, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wright Line Holding, Inc.
A United States provider of customized enclosures, rack
systems, and air-flow management systems to store,
power, and secure mission-critical IT data center
electronics.
|
|
August 25,
2010
|
|
Electrical
Americas
|
|
$101 for the
year ended June 30, 2010 |
Page 26
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Business |
|
Annual |
Acquired business |
|
Date of transaction |
|
segment |
|
sales |
EMC Engineers, Inc.
A United States energy engineering and energy services
company that delivers energy efficiency solutions for a
wide range of governmental, educational, commercial and
industrial facilities.
|
|
July 15,
2010
|
|
Electrical
Americas
|
|
$24 for 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Micro Innovation Holding AG
A Switzerland-based manufacturer of human machine
interfaces, programmable logic controllers and
input/output devices. Eaton acquired the remaining
shares to increase its ownership from 50% to 100%.
|
|
September 1,
2009
|
|
Electrical
Rest of World
|
|
$33 for 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SEG Middle East Power Solutions & Switchboard
Manufacture LLC
A 49%-owned joint venture in Abu Dhabi that manufactures
low-voltage switchboards and control panel assemblies
for use in the Middle East power generation and
industrial markets.
|
|
July 2,
2009
|
|
Electrical
Rest of World
|
|
$10 for 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Integ Holding Limited
The parent company of Integrated Hydraulics Ltd., a
United Kingdom-based manufacturer of screw-in cartridge
valves, custom-engineered hydraulic valves and manifold
systems.
|
|
October 2,
2008
|
|
Hydraulics
|
|
$52 for 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nittan Global Tech Co. Ltd.
A 49%-owned joint venture to manage the global design,
manufacture and supply of engine valves and valve
actuation products to Japanese and Korean automobile and
engine manufacturers. In addition, during the second
half of 2008, several related manufacturing joint
ventures were established.
|
|
Operational
October 1, 2008
|
|
Automotive
|
|
Joint
venture |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Engine Valves Business of Kirloskar Oil Engines Ltd.
An India-based designer, manufacturer and distributor of
intake and exhaust valves for diesel and gasoline
engines.
|
|
July 31,
2008
|
|
Automotive
|
|
$5 for 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PK Electronics
A Belgium-based distributor and service provider of
single-phase and three-phase uninterruptible power
supply (UPS) systems.
|
|
July 31,
2008
|
|
Electrical
Rest of World
|
|
$9 for 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Moeller Group
A Germany-based supplier of electrical components for
commercial and residential building applications and
industrial controls for industrial equipment
applications.
|
|
April 4,
2008
|
|
Electrical
Rest of World
|
|
$1.4 billion
(1.02 billion) for 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balmen Electronic, S.L.
A Spain-based distributor and service provider of
uninterruptible power supply (UPS) systems.
|
|
March 31,
2008
|
|
Electrical
Rest of World
|
|
$6 for 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Phoenixtec Power Company Ltd.
A Taiwan-based manufacturer of single- and three-phase
uninterruptible power supply (UPS) systems.
|
|
February 26,
2008
|
|
Electrical
Rest of World
|
|
$515 for 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On January 1, 2011, Eaton closed the acquisition of the Tuthill Coupling Group, a division of
the Tuthill Corporation. This business, located in the United States and France, manufactures
pneumatic and hydraulic quick coupling solutions and leak-free connectors used in industrial,
construction, mining, defense, energy and power applications. This business had sales of $35 for
the year ended November 30, 2010 and will be included in the Hydraulics business segment.
Page 27
On January 20, 2011, Eaton reached an agreement to acquire ACTOM (Pty) Limiteds
low-voltage electrical business in South Africa. This business is a manufacturer and supplier of
motor control components, engineered electrical distribution systems, and uninterruptible power
supply systems and had sales of $58 for the year ended December 31, 2010. The terms of the
agreement are subject to regulatory approvals and other customary closing conditions. The
acquisition is expected to close during the first half of 2011. This business will be included in
the Electrical Rest of World segment.
Note 3. ACQUISITION INTEGRATION AND RESTRUCTURING CHARGES
Acquisition Integration Charges
Eaton incurs charges related to the integration of acquired businesses. A summary of these
charges follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Business segment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Electrical Americas |
|
$ |
2 |
|
|
$ |
4 |
|
|
$ |
4 |
|
Electrical Rest of World |
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
60 |
|
|
|
43 |
|
Hydraulics |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
Aerospace |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
Automotive |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
80 |
|
|
|
76 |
|
Corporate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total integration charges before
income taxes |
|
$ |
40 |
|
|
$ |
82 |
|
|
$ |
77 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
After-tax integration charges |
|
$ |
27 |
|
|
$ |
54 |
|
|
$ |
51 |
|
Per common share |
|
$ |
0.08 |
|
|
$ |
0.16 |
|
|
$ |
0.17 |
|
Charges in 2010 were related primarily to Moeller and Phoenixtec. Charges in 2009 were related
primarily to Moeller, Phoenixtec and Argo-Tech. Charges in 2008 were related primarily to Moeller,
Phoenixtec, the MGE small systems UPS business, Argo-Tech, PerkinElmer and Cobham. See Note 2 for
additional information about business acquisitions.
Workforce Reduction and Plant Closing Charges
In 2009, Eaton took significant actions to reduce its fulltime workforce by 17% in response to
the severe economic downturn. These actions resulted in the recognition of severance and pension
and other postretirement benefits expense of $182 in 2009.
In 2008, charges of $27 were recognized related to the closure of the automotive engine valve
lifters manufacturing plant in Massa, Italy. These charges, consisting of $17 for severance, $7 for
the write-down of assets and $3 for other costs, reduced operating profit of the Automotive
segment.
A summary of liabilities related to acquisition integration, workforce reduction,
and plant closing charges, follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Plant |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Workforce reductions |
|
|
closing |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employees |
|
|
Dollars |
|
|
and other |
|
|
Total |
|
Balance at January 1, 2008 |
|
|
563 |
|
|
$ |
14 |
|
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
$ |
15 |
|
Liabilities recognized |
|
|
422 |
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
87 |
|
|
|
108 |
|
Utilized |
|
|
(451 |
) |
|
|
(14 |
) |
|
|
(84 |
) |
|
|
(98 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2008 |
|
|
534 |
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
25 |
|
Liabilities recognized |
|
|
12,073 |
|
|
|
195 |
|
|
|
69 |
|
|
|
264 |
|
Utilized |
|
|
(11,189 |
) |
|
|
(173 |
) |
|
|
(61 |
) |
|
|
(234 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2009 |
|
|
1,418 |
|
|
|
43 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
55 |
|
Liabilities recognized |
|
|
202 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
40 |
|
Utilized |
|
|
(1,293 |
) |
|
|
(39 |
) |
|
|
(40 |
) |
|
|
(79 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2010 |
|
|
327 |
|
|
$ |
11 |
|
|
$ |
5 |
|
|
$ |
16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
These charges were included in Cost of products sold or Selling and administrative expense, as
appropriate. In Business Segment Information, the charges reduced Operating profit of the related
business segment. See Note 14 for additional information about business segments.
Page 28
Note 4. GOODWILL AND OTHER INTANGIBLE ASSETS
A summary of goodwill follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Electrical Americas |
|
$ |
2,061 |
|
|
$ |
2,003 |
|
Electrical Rest of World |
|
|
985 |
|
|
|
1,005 |
|
Hydraulics |
|
|
1,007 |
|
|
|
1,016 |
|
Aerospace |
|
|
1,037 |
|
|
|
1,047 |
|
Truck |
|
|
151 |
|
|
|
147 |
|
Automotive |
|
|
213 |
|
|
|
217 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total goodwill |
|
$ |
5,454 |
|
|
$ |
5,435 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The increase in goodwill in 2010 was due to businesses acquired during 2010, the finalization
of purchase price allocations related to businesses acquired in 2009, and foreign currency
translation. For additional information regarding acquired businesses, see Note 2.
A summary of other intangible assets follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
Historical |
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
Historical |
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
cost |
|
|
amortization |
|
|
cost |
|
|
amortization |
|
Intangible assets not subject to
amortization (primarily trademarks) |
|
$ |
451 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
451 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intangible assets subject to amortization |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Customer relationships |
|
$ |
1,187 |
|
|
$ |
274 |
|
|
$ |
1,181 |
|
|
$ |
204 |
|
Patents and technology |
|
|
835 |
|
|
|
260 |
|
|
|
885 |
|
|
|
245 |
|
Other |
|
|
441 |
|
|
|
108 |
|
|
|
456 |
|
|
|
83 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other intangible assets |
|
$ |
2,463 |
|
|
$ |
642 |
|
|
$ |
2,522 |
|
|
$ |
532 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expense related to intangible assets subject to amortization in 2010, and for each of the next
five years, follows:
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
$ |
152 |
|
2011 |
|
|
150 |
|
2012 |
|
|
149 |
|
2013 |
|
|
140 |
|
2014 |
|
|
134 |
|
2015 |
|
|
130 |
|
Page 29
Note 5. DEBT
Short-term debt of $72 at December 31, 2010 included $50 of short-term commercial paper in the
United States which had a weighted-average interest rate of 0.45%, $15 of other short-term debt in
the United States, and $7 of short-term debt outside the United States. Borrowings outside the
United States are generally denominated in local currencies. Operations outside the United States
have available short-term lines of credit of $975 from various banks worldwide at December 31,
2010.
A summary of long-term debt, including the current portion, follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
5.75% notes due 2012 |
|
$ |
300 |
|
|
$ |
300 |
|
7.58% notes due 2012 |
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
4.90% notes due 2013
($200 converted to floating rate by interest rate swap) |
|
|
300 |
|
|
|
300 |
|
5.80% notes due 2013 |
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
5.95% notes due 2014
($100 converted to floating rate by interest rate swap) |
|
|
250 |
|
|
|
250 |
|
12.50% United Kingdom pound sterling debentures due 2014 |
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
4.65% notes due 2015 |
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
100 |
|
5.30% notes due 2017 |
|
|
250 |
|
|
|
250 |
|
6.875% to 7.09% notes due 2018 |
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
36 |
|
5.60% notes due 2018
($115 converted to floating rate by interest rate swap) |
|
|
450 |
|
|
|
450 |
|
4.215% Japanese Yen notes due 2018 |
|
|
123 |
|
|
|
108 |
|
6.95% notes due 2019 |
|
|
300 |
|
|
|
300 |
|
8.875% debentures due 2019
($25 converted to floating rate by interest rate swap) |
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
38 |
|
8.10% debentures due 2022 |
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
100 |
|
7.625% debentures due 2024
($25 converted to floating rate by interest rate swap) |
|
|
66 |
|
|
|
66 |
|
6.50% debentures due 2025 |
|
|
145 |
|
|
|
145 |
|
7.875% debentures due 2026 |
|
|
72 |
|
|
|
72 |
|
7.65% debentures due 2029
($50 converted to floating rate by interest rate swap) |
|
|
200 |
|
|
|
200 |
|
5.45% debentures due 2034
($25 converted to floating rate by interest rate swap) |
|
|
140 |
|
|
|
140 |
|
5.25% notes due 2035 |
|
|
42 |
|
|
|
42 |
|
5.80% notes due 2037 |
|
|
240 |
|
|
|
240 |
|
Other |
|
|
206 |
|
|
|
189 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total long-term debt |
|
|
3,386 |
|
|
|
3,354 |
|
Less current portion of long-term debt |
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt less current portion |
|
$ |
3,382 |
|
|
$ |
3,349 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Eatons United States long-term revolving credit facilities total $1.5 billion, of which $500
expires in each year from 2011 through 2013. These facilities support Eatons commercial paper
borrowings. There were no borrowings outstanding under these revolving credit facilities at
December 31, 2010 or 2009. Eaton is in compliance with each of its debt covenants as of December
31, 2010 and for all periods presented.
Mandatory maturities of long-term debt for each of the next five years follow:
|
|
|
|
|
2011 |
|
$ |
4 |
|
2012 |
|
|
317 |
|
2013 |
|
|
310 |
|
2014 |
|
|
262 |
|
2015 |
|
|
104 |
|
Interest paid on debt follows:
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
$ |
206 |
|
2009
|
|
|
180 |
|
2010
|
|
|
170 |
|
Page 30
Note 6. RETIREMENT BENEFITS PLANS
Eaton has defined benefits pension plans and other postretirement benefits plans.
Obligations and Funded Status
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States |
|
|
Non-United States |
|
|
Other postretirement |
|
|
|
pension liabilities |
|
|
pension liabilities |
|
|
liabilities |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Funded status |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of plan assets |
|
$ |
1,572 |
|
|
$ |
1,210 |
|
|
$ |
937 |
|
|
$ |
832 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Benefit obligations |
|
|
(2,458 |
) |
|
|
(2,244 |
) |
|
|
(1,460 |
) |
|
|
(1,366 |
) |
|
|
(826 |
) |
|
|
(830 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funded status |
|
$ |
(886 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,034 |
) |
|
$ |
(523 |
) |
|
$ |
(534 |
) |
|
$ |
(826 |
) |
|
$ |
(830 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amounts recognized in the
Consolidated Balance Sheets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-current assets |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
52 |
|
|
$ |
50 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Current liabilities |
|
|
(9 |
) |
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
(23 |
) |
|
|
(24 |
) |
|
|
(83 |
) |
|
|
(76 |
) |
Non-current liabilities |
|
|
(877 |
) |
|
|
(1,026 |
) |
|
|
(552 |
) |
|
|
(560 |
) |
|
|
(743 |
) |
|
|
(754 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
(886 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,034 |
) |
|
$ |
(523 |
) |
|
$ |
(534 |
) |
|
$ |
(826 |
) |
|
$ |
(830 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amounts recognized in
Accumulated other
comprehensive loss (pretax) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net actuarial loss |
|
$ |
1,142 |
|
|
$ |
1,107 |
|
|
$ |
311 |
|
|
$ |
256 |
|
|
$ |
232 |
|
|
$ |
228 |
|
Prior service cost (credit) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
(11 |
) |
|
|
(12 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
1,142 |
|
|
$ |
1,107 |
|
|
$ |
319 |
|
|
$ |
263 |
|
|
$ |
221 |
|
|
$ |
216 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in Benefit Obligations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States |
|
|
Non-United States |
|
|
Other postretirement |
|
|
|
pension liabilities |
|
|
pension liabilities |
|
|
liabilities |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Balance at January 1 |
|
$ |
2,244 |
|
|
$ |
2,145 |
|
|
$ |
1,366 |
|
|
$ |
1,143 |
|
|
$ |
830 |
|
|
$ |
779 |
|
Service cost |
|
|
80 |
|
|
|
76 |
|
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
Interest cost |
|
|
131 |
|
|
|
133 |
|
|
|
69 |
|
|
|
70 |
|
|
|
46 |
|
|
|
49 |
|
Actuarial loss |
|
|
133 |
|
|
|
98 |
|
|
|
94 |
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
70 |
|
Gross benefits paid |
|
|
(122 |
) |
|
|
(229 |
) |
|
|
(76 |
) |
|
|
(89 |
) |
|
|
(88 |
) |
|
|
(96 |
) |
Foreign currency translation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(53 |
) |
|
|
98 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
Other |
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31 |
|
$ |
2,458 |
|
|
$ |
2,244 |
|
|
$ |
1,460 |
|
|
$ |
1,366 |
|
|
$ |
826 |
|
|
$ |
830 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated benefit obligation |
|
$ |
2,366 |
|
|
$ |
2,143 |
|
|
$ |
1,330 |
|
|
$ |
1,261 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in Plan Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States |
|
|
Non-United States |
|
|
Other postretirement |
|
|
|
pension liabilities |
|
|
pension liabilities |
|
|
liabilities |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Balance at January 1 |
|
$ |
1,210 |
|
|
$ |
994 |
|
|
$ |
832 |
|
|
$ |
680 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Actual return on plan assets |
|
|
182 |
|
|
|
253 |
|
|
|
96 |
|
|
|
77 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employer contributions |
|
|
313 |
|
|
|
192 |
|
|
|
90 |
|
|
|
79 |
|
|
|
88 |
|
|
|
96 |
|
Gross benefits paid |
|
|
(122 |
) |
|
|
(229 |
) |
|
|
(76 |
) |
|
|
(89 |
) |
|
|
(88 |
) |
|
|
(96 |
) |
Foreign currency translation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(21 |
) |
|
|
79 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
(11 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31 |
|
$ |
1,572 |
|
|
$ |
1,210 |
|
|
$ |
937 |
|
|
$ |
832 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page 31
The components of pension plans with an accumulated benefit obligation in excess of plan
assets at December 31 follow:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States |
|
Non-United States |
|
|
pension liabilities |
|
pension liabilities |
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
Projected benefit obligation |
|
$ |
2,458 |
|
|
$ |
2,244 |
|
|
$ |
1,114 |
|
|
$ |
1,146 |
|
Accumulated benefit obligation |
|
|
2,366 |
|
|
|
2,143 |
|
|
|
1,026 |
|
|
|
1,074 |
|
Fair value of plan assets |
|
|
1,572 |
|
|
|
1,210 |
|
|
|
554 |
|
|
|
582 |
|
Changes in pension and other postretirement benefit liabilities recognized in Accumulated
other comprehensive loss follow:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States |
|
|
Non-United States |
|
|
Other postretirement |
|
|
|
pension liabilities |
|
|
pension liabilities |
|
|
liabilities |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Balance at January 1 |
|
$ |
1,107 |
|
|
$ |
1,244 |
|
|
$ |
263 |
|
|
$ |
169 |
|
|
$ |
216 |
|
|
$ |
146 |
|
Prior service cost arising during
the year |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss (gain) arising during the
year |
|
|
107 |
|
|
|
(24 |
) |
|
|
60 |
|
|
|
83 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
70 |
|
Foreign currency translation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
Less amounts included in expense
during the year |
|
|
(69 |
) |
|
|
(117 |
) |
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
(11 |
) |
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
Other |
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net change for the year |
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
(137 |
) |
|
|
56 |
|
|
|
94 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
70 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31 |
|
$ |
1,142 |
|
|
$ |
1,107 |
|
|
$ |
319 |
|
|
$ |
263 |
|
|
$ |
221 |
|
|
$ |
216 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefits Expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States |
|
|
Non-United States |
|
Other postretirement |
|
|
pension benefit expense |
|
|
pension benefit expense |
|
|
benefits expense |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Service cost |
|
$ |
80 |
|
|
$ |
76 |
|
|
$ |
94 |
|
|
$ |
39 |
|
|
$ |
34 |
|
|
$ |
43 |
|
|
$ |
16 |
|
|
$ |
15 |
|
|
$ |
15 |
|
Interest cost |
|
|
131 |
|
|
|
133 |
|
|
|
122 |
|
|
|
69 |
|
|
|
70 |
|
|
|
68 |
|
|
|
46 |
|
|
|
49 |
|
|
|
49 |
|
Expected return
on plan assets |
|
|
(156 |
) |
|
|
(131 |
) |
|
|
(138 |
) |
|
|
(62 |
) |
|
|
(58 |
) |
|
|
(60 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization |
|
|
53 |
|
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
42 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
108 |
|
|
|
112 |
|
|
|
120 |
|
|
|
54 |
|
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
58 |
|
|
|
72 |
|
|
|
65 |
|
|
|
75 |
|
Curtailment loss |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
Settlement loss |
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
83 |
|
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total expense |
|
$ |
125 |
|
|
$ |
212 |
|
|
$ |
153 |
|
|
$ |
54 |
|
|
$ |
58 |
|
|
$ |
61 |
|
|
$ |
72 |
|
|
$ |
66 |
|
|
$ |
75 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In 2009, due to limitations imposed by the Pension Protection Act on pension lump-sum
distributions, Eatons United States Qualified Pension Plan (the Plan) became restricted from
making 100% lump-sum payments. As a result, the Plan experienced a significant increase in lump-sum
payments in 2009 prior to the limitation going into effect. Pension settlement expense was $86 for
2009, of which $83 was attributable to the United States pension plans. A portion of the increase
in lump-sum payments was attributable to the workforce reduction in 2009. Additionally, as a result
of the workforce reduction in 2009, Eaton incurred curtailment expense related to pension plans.
The curtailment expense included recognition of the change in the projected benefit obligation, as
well as recognition of a portion of the unrecognized prior service cost. Curtailment expense was
$22 for 2009. These charges were primarily included in Cost of products sold or Selling and
administrative expense, as appropriate. In Business Segment Information, the charges were included
in Pension and other postretirement benefits expense. See Note 14 for additional information
regarding business segments.
Page 32
The estimated pretax net amounts that will be recognized from Accumulated other comprehensive
loss into net periodic benefit cost in 2011 follow:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
United States |
|
|
Non-United States |
|
|
postretirement |
|
|
|
pension liabilities |
|
|
pension liabilities |
|
|
liabilities |
|
Actuarial loss |
|
$ |
93 |
|
|
$ |
15 |
|
|
$ |
13 |
|
Prior service cost (credit) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
93 |
|
|
$ |
17 |
|
|
$ |
11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retirement Benefits Plans Assumptions
Pension Plans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States |
|
Non-United States |
|
|
pension plans |
|
pension plans |
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
Assumptions used to determine benefit
obligation at year-end |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discount rate |
|
|
5.50 |
% |
|
|
6.00 |
% |
|
|
6.30 |
% |
|
|
5.40 |
% |
|
|
5.59 |
% |
|
|
6.26 |
% |
Rate of compensation increase |
|
|
3.61 |
% |
|
|
3.62 |
% |
|
|
3.64 |
% |
|
|
3.63 |
% |
|
|
3.58 |
% |
|
|
3.56 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assumptions used to determine expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discount rate |
|
|
6.00 |
% |
|
|
6.30 |
% |
|
|
6.00 |
% |
|
|
5.59 |
% |
|
|
6.26 |
% |
|
|
5.93 |
% |
Expected long-term return on plan
assets |
|
|
8.95 |
% |
|
|
8.94 |
% |
|
|
8.94 |
% |
|
|
7.20 |
% |
|
|
7.06 |
% |
|
|
7.39 |
% |
Rate of compensation increase |
|
|
3.62 |
% |
|
|
3.64 |
% |
|
|
3.64 |
% |
|
|
3.58 |
% |
|
|
3.56 |
% |
|
|
3.60 |
% |
The expected long-term rate of return on pension assets was determined for each country and
reflects long-term historical data taking into account each plans target asset allocation. The
discount rate was determined using appropriate bond data for each country.
Other Postretirement Benefits Plans
Substantially all of the obligation for other postretirement benefits plans relates to United
States plans. Assumptions used to determine other postretirement benefits obligations and expense
follow:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other postretirement benefits plans |
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
Assumptions used to determine benefit obligation at year-end |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discount rate |
|
|
5.20 |
% |
|
|
5.70 |
% |
|
|
6.30 |
% |
Health care cost trend rate assumed for next year |
|
|
8.10 |
% |
|
|
8.30 |
% |
|
|
8.25 |
% |
Ultimate health care cost trend rate |
|
|
4.50 |
% |
|
|
4.75 |
% |
|
|
4.75 |
% |
Year ultimate health care cost trend rate is achieved |
|
|
2020 |
|
|
|
2017 |
|
|
|
2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assumptions used to determine expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discount rate |
|
|
5.70 |
% |
|
|
6.30 |
% |
|
|
6.00 |
% |
Initial health care cost trend rate |
|
|
8.30 |
% |
|
|
8.25 |
% |
|
|
8.30 |
% |
Ultimate health care cost trend rate |
|
|
4.75 |
% |
|
|
4.75 |
% |
|
|
4.75 |
% |
Year ultimate health care cost trend rate is achieved |
|
|
2017 |
|
|
|
2017 |
|
|
|
2015 |
|
Assumed health care cost trend rates may have a significant effect on the amounts reported for
the health care plans. A 1-percentage point change in the assumed health care cost trend rates
would have the following effects:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1% increase |
|
1% decrease |
Effect on total service and interest cost |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Effect on other postretirement liabilities |
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
(15 |
) |
Page 33
Employer Contributions to Pension Plans
Contributions to pension plans that Eaton expects to make in 2011, and made in 2010, 2009 and
2008, follow:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
United States plans |
|
$ |
259 |
|
|
$ |
313 |
|
|
$ |
192 |
|
|
$ |
124 |
|
Non-United States plans |
|
|
94 |
|
|
|
90 |
|
|
|
79 |
|
|
|
86 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total contributions |
|
$ |
353 |
|
|
$ |
403 |
|
|
$ |
271 |
|
|
$ |
210 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table provides the estimated pension and other postretirement benefit payments
for each of the next five years, and the five years thereafter in the aggregate. For other
postretirement benefits liabilities, the expected subsidy receipts relate to the Medicare
Prescription Drug, Improvement, and Modernization Act of 2003, which would reduce the gross
payments listed below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated other postretirement |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
benefit payments |
|
|
Estimated |
|
Estimated |
|
|
|
|
|
Medicare |
|
|
United States |
|
non-United States |
|
|
|
|
|
prescription |
|
|
pension payments |
|
pension payments |
|
Gross |
|
drug subsidy |
2011 |
|
$ |
130 |
|
|
$ |
69 |
|
|
$ |
93 |
|
|
$ |
(8 |
) |
2012 |
|
|
134 |
|
|
|
71 |
|
|
|
91 |
|
|
|
(8 |
) |
2013 |
|
|
283 |
|
|
|
72 |
|
|
|
88 |
|
|
|
(8 |
) |
2014 |
|
|
181 |
|
|
|
74 |
|
|
|
85 |
|
|
|
(8 |
) |
2015 |
|
|
188 |
|
|
|
77 |
|
|
|
84 |
|
|
|
(7 |
) |
2016 - 2020 |
|
|
1,090 |
|
|
|
424 |
|
|
|
347 |
|
|
|
(24 |
) |
Pension lump-sum payments in 2011 and 2012 are restricted to 50% due to limitations imposed by
the Pension Protection Act.
Pension Plan Assets
Investment policies and strategies are developed on a country specific basis. The United
States plans, representing 63% of worldwide pension assets, and the United Kingdom plans
representing 29% of worldwide pension assets, are invested primarily for growth, as they are open
plans with active participants and ongoing accruals. In general, the plans have their primary
allocation to diversified, global equities, primarily through index funds in the form of common
collective trusts. The United States plans target allocation is 35% United States equities, 35%
non-United States equities, 5% real estate (primarily equity of real estate investment trusts) and
25% debt securities and other, including cash equivalents. The United Kingdom plans target asset
allocations are 69% equities and the remainder in debt securities. The equity risk for the plans is
managed through broad geographical diversification and diversification across industries and levels
of market capitalization. The majority of debt allocations for these plans are longer duration
government (including inflation protected securities) and corporate debt. The United States pension
plan is authorized to use derivatives to achieve more economically desired market exposures and to
use futures, swaps and options to gain or hedge exposures.
Pension Plan Assets Fair Value Measurements
Financial instruments included in pension plan assets are categorized into a fair value
hierarchy of three levels, based on the degree of subjectivity inherent in the valuation
methodology as follows:
|
|
|
Level 1 Quoted prices (unadjusted) for identical assets in active markets. |
|
|
|
Level 2 Quoted prices for similar assets in active markets, and inputs that are
observable for the asset, either
directly or indirectly, for substantially the full term of the financial instrument. |
|
|
|
Level 3 Unobservable prices or inputs. |
Page 34
A summary of the fair value of pension plan assets at December 31, 2010 and 2009, and the fair
value measurement used, follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted prices |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
in active |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
markets for |
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
identical |
|
|
observable |
|
|
Unobservable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
assets |
|
|
inputs |
|
|
inputs |
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
(Level 1) |
|
|
(Level 2) |
|
|
(Level 3) |
|
2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common collective trusts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-United States equity and global
equities |
|
$ |
965 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
965 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
United States equity |
|
|
577 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
577 |
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed income |
|
|
241 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
241 |
|
|
|
|
|
Long duration funds |
|
|
91 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
91 |
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed income securities |
|
|
230 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
230 |
|
|
|
|
|
United States treasuries |
|
|
101 |
|
|
|
101 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate |
|
|
81 |
|
|
|
81 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity securities |
|
|
78 |
|
|
|
78 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash equivalents |
|
|
77 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
67 |
|
|
|
|
|
Registered investment companies |
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total pension plan assets |
|
$ |
2,509 |
|
|
$ |
304 |
|
|
$ |
2,171 |
|
|
$ |
34 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common collective trusts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-United States equity and global
equities |
|
$ |
839 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
839 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
United States equity |
|
|
646 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
646 |
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed income |
|
|
296 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
296 |
|
|
|
|
|
Long duration funds |
|
|
84 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
84 |
|
|
|
|
|
Cash equivalents |
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
|
|
United States treasuries |
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Registered investment companies |
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash equivalents |
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other fixed income |
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total pension plan assets |
|
$ |
2,042 |
|
|
$ |
70 |
|
|
$ |
1,943 |
|
|
$ |
29 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Following is a description of the valuation methodologies used for pension plan assets
measured at fair value. There have been no changes in the methodologies used at December 31, 2010
and 2009.
|
|
Common collective trusts Valued at the net unit value of units held by the trust at year
end. The unit value is determined by the total value of fund assets divided by the total
number of units of the fund owned. The equity investments in collective trusts are
predominantly in index funds for which the underlying securities are actively traded in public
markets based upon readily measurable prices. |
|
|
|
Fixed income securities These securities consist of publicly traded Unites States and
non-United States fixed interest obligations (principally corporate and government bonds and
debentures). The fair value of corporate and government debt securities is determined through
models that consider various assumptions, including time value, yield curves, credit ratings
and current market prices. |
|
|
|
United States treasuries Valued at the closing price of each security. |
|
|
|
Real estate and equity securities These securities consist of direct investments in the
stock of publicly traded companies. Such investments are valued based on the closing price
reported in an active market on which the individual securities are traded. As such, the
direct investments are classified as Level 1. |
|
|
|
Cash equivalents Primarily certificates of deposit, commercial paper and repurchase
agreements. |
|
|
|
Registered investment companies Valued at the closing price of the exchange traded funds shares. |
Page 35
|
|
Other fixed income Asset backed securities, agencies and variable rate bonds valued based
on pricing models which incorporate information from market sources and observed market
movements. |
|
|
Other Primarily insurance contracts for international plans and also futures contracts
and over-the-counter options. These investments are valued based on the closing prices of
future contracts or indices as available on the Bloomberg or similar service, and private
equity investments. |
For additional information regarding fair value measurements, see Note 11.
Defined Contribution Plans
The Company has various defined contribution benefit plans, primarily consisting of the Eaton
Savings Plan in the United States. The total contributions related to these plans are charged to
expense and were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
2008 |
|
$ |
64 |
|
2009 |
|
|
25 |
|
2010 |
|
|
33 |
|
Note 7. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
Legal Contingencies
In December 2010, a Brazilian court held that a judgment against a Brazilian company sold by
Eaton in 2006 could be enforced against Eaton. The Company recognized a pretax provision of 60
Brazilian Reais ($36 based on current exchange rates) related to this legal matter as a corporate
charge classified in Other (income) expense-net. Eaton is appealing this decision in the Brazilian
court system.
On October 5, 2006, ZF Meritor LLC and Meritor Transmission Corporation (collectively,
Meritor) filed an action against Eaton in the United States District Court for Delaware. The action
sought damages, which would be trebled under United States antitrust laws, as well as injunctive
relief and costs. The suit alleged that Eaton engaged in anti-competitive conduct against Meritor
in the sale of heavy-duty truck transmissions in North America. Following a four week trial on
liability only, on October 8, 2009, the jury returned a verdict in favor of Meritor. Eaton firmly
believes that it competes fairly and honestly for business in the marketplace, and that at no time
did it act in an anti-competitive manner. During an earlier stage in the case, the judge concluded
that damage estimates contained in a report filed by Meritor were not based on reliable data and
the report was specifically excluded from the case. On November 3, 2009, Eaton filed a motion for
judgment as a matter of law and to set aside the verdict. That motion is currently pending.
Accordingly, an estimate of any potential loss related to this action cannot be made at this time.
Eaton is subject to a broad range of claims, administrative and legal proceedings, such as
lawsuits that relate to contractual allegations, tax audits, patent infringement, personal injuries
(including asbestos claims), antitrust matters and employment-related matters. Although it is not
possible to predict with certainty the outcome or cost of these matters, the Company believes they
will not have a material adverse effect on the consolidated financial statements.
Environmental Contingencies
Eaton has established policies to ensure that its operations are conducted in keeping with
good corporate citizenship and with a positive commitment to the protection of the natural and
workplace environments. The Companys manufacturing facilities are required to be certified to ISO
14001, an international standard for environmental management systems. The Company routinely
reviews EHS performance at each of its facilities and continuously strives to improve pollution
prevention.
Eaton is involved in remedial response and voluntary environmental remediation at a number of
sites, including certain of its currently-owned or formerly-owned plants. The Company has also been
named a potentially responsible party under the federal Superfund law at a number of disposal
sites. The Company became involved in these sites through the Companys voluntary decision, in
connection with business acquisitions, or as a result of government action. At the end of 2010, the
Company was involved with a total of 80 sites world-wide, including the Superfund sites mentioned
above, with none of these sites being individually significant to the Company.
Remediation activities, generally involving soil and/or groundwater contamination, include
pre-cleanup activities such as fact finding and investigation, risk assessment, feasibility study,
design and action planning, performance (where actions may range from monitoring, to removal of
contaminants, to installation of longer-term remediation systems), and operation and maintenance of
a remediation system. The extent of expected remediation activities and costs varies by site. A
number of factors affect the cost of environmental remediation, including the number of parties
involved at a particular site, the determination of the extent of contamination, the length of time
the remediation may require, the
Page 36
complexity of environmental regulations, and the continuing advancement of remediation technology.
Taking these factors into account, Eaton has estimated the costs of remediation, which will be paid
over a period of years. The Company accrues an amount on an undiscounted basis, consistent with the
estimates of these costs when it is probable that a liability has been incurred. Actual results may
differ from these estimates. At December 31, 2010 and 2009, the Company had an accrual totaling $71
and $80, respectively, for these costs.
Warranty Accruals
A summary of the current and long-term warranty accruals follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Balance at January 1 |
|
$ |
147 |
|
|
$ |
165 |
|
|
$ |
167 |
|
Provision |
|
|
99 |
|
|
|
77 |
|
|
|
95 |
|
Settled |
|
|
(91 |
) |
|
|
(98 |
) |
|
|
(108 |
) |
Business acquisitions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13 |
|
Other |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31 |
|
$ |
153 |
|
|
$ |
147 |
|
|
$ |
165 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lease Commitments
Eaton leases certain real properties and equipment. A summary of minimum rental commitments at
December 31, 2010 under noncancelable operating leases, which expire at various dates and in most
cases contain renewal options, for each of the next five years and thereafter in the aggregate,
follow:
|
|
|
|
|
2011 |
|
$ |
145 |
|
2012 |
|
|
106 |
|
2013 |
|
|
78 |
|
2014 |
|
|
49 |
|
2015 |
|
|
39 |
|
Thereafter |
|
|
59 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total noncancelable lease commitments |
|
$ |
476 |
|
|
|
|
|
A summary of rental expense follows:
|
|
|
|
|
2008 |
|
$ |
173 |
|
2009 |
|
|
177 |
|
2010 |
|
|
172 |
|
Note 8. INCOME TAXES
Income from continuing operations before income taxes and income tax expense is summarized
below based on the geographic location of the operation to which such earnings and income taxes are
attributable. Certain foreign operations are branches of Eaton and are, therefore, subject to
United States as well as foreign income tax regulations. As a result, income before tax by location
and the components of income tax expense by taxing jurisdiction are not directly related. For
purposes of this note, non-United States operations include Puerto Rico.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations |
|
|
|
before income taxes |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
United States |
|
$ |
114 |
|
|
$ |
(298 |
) |
|
$ |
123 |
|
Non-United States |
|
|
922 |
|
|
|
601 |
|
|
|
1,017 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total income before income taxes |
|
$ |
1,036 |
|
|
$ |
303 |
|
|
$ |
1,140 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page 37
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax expense (benefit) from |
|
|
|
continuing operations |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Current |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal |
|
$ |
(2 |
) |
|
$ |
40 |
|
|
$ |
36 |
|
State and local |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
Non-United States |
|
|
107 |
|
|
|
69 |
|
|
|
219 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current income tax expense |
|
|
106 |
|
|
|
114 |
|
|
|
259 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal |
|
|
95 |
|
|
|
(174 |
) |
|
|
(17 |
) |
State and local |
|
|
(15 |
) |
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
(42 |
) |
Non-United States |
|
|
(87 |
) |
|
|
(18 |
) |
|
|
(127 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deferred income tax expense (benefit) |
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
(196 |
) |
|
|
(186 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total income tax expense (benefit) |
|
$ |
99 |
|
|
$ |
(82 |
) |
|
$ |
73 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reconciliations of income taxes from the United States federal statutory rate of 35% to the
consolidated effective income tax rate for continuing operations follow:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
Income taxes at the United States federal statutory rate |
|
|
35.0 |
% |
|
|
35.0 |
% |
|
|
35.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
State and local income taxes |
|
|
(0.1 |
)% |
|
|
0.4 |
% |
|
|
0.3 |
% |
Deductible dividends |
|
|
(0.6 |
)% |
|
|
(2.1 |
)% |
|
|
(0.5 |
)% |
Deductible interest |
|
|
(0.8 |
)% |
|
|
(2.3 |
)% |
|
|
(0.6 |
)% |
Credit for increasing research activities |
|
|
(1.4 |
)% |
|
|
(3.9 |
)% |
|
|
(1.2 |
)% |
Write-off deferred income tax asset due to impact of Health
Care Reform and Education Reconciliation Act on
taxation associated with Medicare Part D |
|
|
2.2 |
% |
|
|
0.0 |
% |
|
|
0.0 |
% |
Other-net |
|
|
1.4 |
% |
|
|
5.0 |
% |
|
|
4.8 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-United States operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign tax credit |
|
|
(6.4 |
)% |
|
|
(2.5 |
)% |
|
|
(3.0 |
)% |
Non-United States operations
(earnings taxed at other than the United States tax rate) |
|
|
(13.9 |
)% |
|
|
(52.6 |
)% |
|
|
(18.9 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Worldwide operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustments to tax liabilities |
|
|
(1.2 |
)% |
|
|
(11.9 |
)% |
|
|
(3.6 |
)% |
Adjustments to valuation allowances |
|
|
(4.7 |
)% |
|
|
7.7 |
% |
|
|
(5.9 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effective income tax expense (benefit) rate |
|
|
9.5 |
% |
|
|
(27.2 |
)% |
|
|
6.4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During 2010, income tax expense of $99 was recognized (an effective tax rate of 9.5%) compared
to an income tax benefit of $82 for 2009 (a tax benefit rate of 27.2%). The increased tax rate is
primarily attributable to higher United States income at the higher relative United States tax
rate, a one-time, non-cash charge of $22 to reflect the impact of the Health Care Reform and
Education Reconciliation Act on taxation associated with Medicare Part D, and adjustments of $22 to tax liabilities
related to an income tax audit of transfer pricing for 2005 to 2009, partially offset by successful
resolution of international tax issues, the recognition of state and local income tax attributes
involving tax loss carryforwards, tax credits and other temporary differences, and enhanced
realization of international deferred tax assets. Earnings taxed at other than the United States tax rate includes the impact of tax
holidays in certain jurisdictions.
With limited exceptions, no provision has been made for income taxes on undistributed earnings
of non-United States subsidiaries of $6 billion at December 31, 2010, since it is the Companys
intention to indefinitely reinvest undistributed earnings of its foreign subsidiaries. It is not
practicable to estimate the additional income taxes and applicable foreign withholding taxes that
would be payable on the remittance of such undistributed earnings.
Page 38
Worldwide income tax payments follow:
|
|
|
|
|
2008 |
|
$ |
185 |
|
2009 |
|
|
124 |
|
2010 |
|
|
141 |
|
Deferred Income Tax Assets and Liabilities
Components of current and long-term deferred income taxes follow:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term |
|
|
|
Current |
|
|
assets and |
|
|
Current |
|
|
assets and |
|
|
|
assets |
|
|
liabilities |
|
|
assets |
|
|
liabilities |
|
Accruals and other adjustments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employee benefits |
|
$ |
94 |
|
|
$ |
681 |
|
|
$ |
78 |
|
|
$ |
773 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(567 |
) |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
(642 |
) |
Other accruals and adjustments |
|
|
224 |
|
|
|
90 |
|
|
|
293 |
|
|
|
103 |
|
Other items |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
United States federal income tax
loss carryforwards (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
38 |
|
United States federal income tax
credit carryforwards |
|
|
|
|
|
|
253 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
165 |
|
United States state and local tax loss
carryforwards and tax credit carryforwards |
|
|
|
|
|
|
74 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
72 |
|
Non-United States tax loss carryforwards |
|
|
|
|
|
|
360 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
291 |
|
Non-United States income tax credit
carryforwards |
|
|
|
|
|
|
72 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
66 |
|
Valuation allowance for income tax loss and
income tax credit carryforwards |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(421 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(360 |
) |
Other valuation allowances |
|
|
(14 |
) |
|
|
(27 |
) |
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
(78 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deferred income taxes |
|
$ |
303 |
|
|
$ |
514 |
|
|
$ |
377 |
|
|
$ |
423 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
United States deferred income tax assets of $37 for income tax loss
carryforwards were reduced by $32 for the excess income tax benefit related to the exercise of
stock options. A tax benefit and a credit to Capital in excess of par value for the excess benefit will
not be recognized until the deduction reduces income taxes payable. The net income tax loss
carryforward of $37 in the table below reflects the $32 related to the excess income tax benefit. |
At the end of 2010, United States federal income tax loss carryforwards and income tax credit
carryforwards were available to reduce future federal income tax liabilities. A summary of these
carryforwards and their expiration dates are summarized below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011 |
|
2016 |
|
2021 |
|
2026 |
|
Not |
|
|
|
|
through |
|
through |
|
through |
|
through |
|
subject to |
|
Valuation |
|
|
2015 |
|
2020 |
|
2025 |
|
2030 |
|
expiration |
|
allowance |
United States federal income tax
loss carryforwards |
|
$ |
2 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
13 |
|
|
$ |
92 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
United States federal deferred
income tax assets for income
tax loss carryforwards (1) |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6 |
) |
United States federal income tax
credit carryforwards |
|
|
|
|
|
|
109 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
83 |
|
|
|
51 |
|
|
|
(18 |
) |
United States state and local tax loss carryforwards and tax credit carryforwards with a
future tax benefit are also available at the end of 2010. A summary of these carryforwards and
their expiration are summarized below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011 |
|
2016 |
|
2021 |
|
2026 |
|
Not |
|
|
|
|
through |
|
through |
|
through |
|
through |
|
subject to |
|
Valuation |
|
|
2015 |
|
2020 |
|
2025 |
|
2030 |
|
expiration |
|
allowance |
United States state and local
income tax loss carryforwards -
net of federal tax effect |
|
$ |
5 |
|
|
$ |
6 |
|
|
$ |
15 |
|
|
$ |
10 |
|
|
$ |
3 |
|
|
$ |
(10 |
) |
United States state and local
income tax credit carryforwards -
net of federal tax effect |
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
(20 |
) |
Page 39
At December 31, 2010, certain non-United States subsidiaries had tax loss carryforwards and
income tax credit carryforwards that are available to offset future taxable income. A summary of
these carryforwards and their expiration is provided below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011 |
|
2016 |
|
2021 |
|
2026 |
|
Not |
|
|
|
|
through |
|
through |
|
through |
|
through |
|
subject to |
|
Valuation |
|
|
2015 |
|
2020 |
|
2025 |
|
2030 |
|
expiration |
|
allowance |
Non-United States income tax
loss carryforwards |
|
$ |
161 |
|
|
$ |
155 |
|
|
$ |
46 |
|
|
$ |
4 |
|
|
$ |
947 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Non-United States deferred
income tax assets for income
tax loss carryforwards |
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
42 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
262 |
|
|
|
(331 |
) |
Non-United States income tax
credit carryforwards |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
60 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
(11 |
) |
Recoverability of Deferred Income Tax Assets
Eaton is subject to the income tax laws in the jurisdictions in which it operates. In order
to determine its income tax provision for financial statement purposes, Eaton must make significant
estimates and judgments about its business operations in these jurisdictions. These estimates and
judgments are also used in determining the deferred income tax assets and liabilities that have
been recognized for differences between the financial statement and income tax basis of assets and
liabilities, and income tax loss carryforwards and income tax credit carryforwards.
Management evaluates the realizability of deferred income tax assets for each of the
jurisdictions in which it operates. If the Company experiences cumulative pretax income in a
particular jurisdiction in the three-year period including the current and prior two years,
management normally concludes that the deferred income tax assets will more likely than not be
realizable and no valuation allowance is recognized, unless known or planned operating developments
would lead management to conclude otherwise. However, if the Company experiences cumulative pretax
losses in a particular jurisdiction in the three-year period including the current and prior two
years, management then considers a series of significant factors in the determination of whether
the deferred income tax assets can be realized. The significant factors include historical
operating results, known or planned operating developments, the period of time over which certain
temporary differences will reverse, consideration of the utilization of certain deferred income tax
liabilities, tax law carryback capability in the particular country, prudent and feasible tax
planning strategies, and estimates of future earnings and taxable income using the same assumptions
as the Companys goodwill and other impairment testing. After evaluation of these factors, if the
deferred income tax assets are expected to be realized within the tax carryforward period allowed
for that specific country, management would conclude that no valuation allowance would be required.
To the extent that the deferred income tax assets exceed the amount that is expected to be realized
within the tax carryforward period for a particular jurisdiction, management would conclude that a
valuation allowance is required.
As of December 31, 2010, United States federal deferred income tax assets were $1.3 billion.
The largest component of the deferred income tax assets is due to timing differences between
revenue and expense recognition for income tax versus financial statement purposes. In addition,
the Company had a tax net operating loss in the United States in 2010 and possesses certain income tax
credit carryforwards that comprise the remainder of the balance. Over the 20 year carryforward
period available for net operating losses and general business credits, taxable income of
approximately $3.7 billion would need to be realized to utilize all deferred income tax assets.
As of December 31, 2010, management believes that, with a couple of very limited exceptions totaling $24, it is more likely than not that the entire United States federal deferred income tax assets will be
realized.
Applying the above methodology, valuation allowances have been established for certain United
States federal, state and local income, as well as certain non-United States, deferred income tax assets to
the extent they are not expected to be realized within the particular tax carryforward period.
Unrecognized Income Tax Benefits
Eatons historical policy has been to enter into tax planning strategies only if it is more
likely than not that the benefit would be sustained upon audit. For example, the Company does not
enter into any of the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) Listed Transactions as set forth in Treasury
Regulation 1.6011-4.
Page 40
A summary of gross unrecognized income tax benefits follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Balance at January 1 |
|
$ |
197 |
|
|
$ |
139 |
|
|
$ |
96 |
|
Increases and decreases as a result of positions taken
during prior years |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transfers to valuation allowances |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(2 |
) |
Other increases |
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
Other decreases, including foreign currency translation |
|
|
(31 |
) |
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
(18 |
) |
Balances related to acquired businesses |
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
30 |
|
Increases as a result of positions taken during the
current year |
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
35 |
|
Decreases relating to settlements with tax authorities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Decreases as a result of a lapse of the applicable statute
of limitations |
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
(13 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31 |
|
$ |
224 |
|
|
$ |
197 |
|
|
$ |
139 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If all unrecognized tax benefits were recognized, the net impact on the effective income tax
rate would be $177.
As of December 31, 2010 and 2009, Eaton had accrued approximately $36 and $43, respectively,
for the payment of worldwide interest and penalties. Eaton recognizes interest and penalties
related to unrecognized income tax benefits in the provision for income tax expense. The Company
has accrued penalties in jurisdictions where they are automatically applied to any deficiency,
regardless of the merit of the position.
During 2010, Eaton received a significant tax assessment in an international jurisdiction. The
Company had previously filed and received a tax ruling on the key aspects of the transaction not
specifically covered by the plain meaning of the local tax statutes. The ruling request fully
disclosed all steps of the transaction. Multiple outside advisors have stated that the foreign
government is raising the issue for most clients with similar facts and that the matter is expected
to require at least 10 years to resolve. Management believes that final resolution of the
assessment will not have a material impact on the consolidated financial statements.
The resolution of the majority of Eatons unrecognized income tax benefits is dependent upon
uncontrollable factors such as law changes; the prospect of retroactive regulations; new case law;
the willingness of the income tax authority to settle the issue, including the timing thereof; and
other factors. Therefore, for the majority of unrecognized income tax benefits, it is not
reasonably possible to estimate the increase or decrease in the next 12 months. For each of the
unrecognized income tax benefits where it is possible to estimate the increase or decrease in the
balance within the next 12 months, the Company does not anticipate any significant change.
Eaton or its subsidiaries file income tax returns in the United States and foreign
jurisdictions. The United States Internal Revenue Service (IRS) has continued their examination of
the Companys United States income tax returns for 2005 and 2006, which is expected to conclude at
the end of 2011. Although the formal examination has not begun, the Company has recently extended
the statute of limitations for the IRS to examine its United States income tax returns for 2007
until December 31, 2012. Eaton is also under examination for the income tax filings in various
state and foreign jurisdictions. With only a few exceptions, the Company is no longer subject to
state and local income tax examinations for years before 2007, or foreign examinations for years
before 2005. Eaton does not anticipate any material adjustments to the consolidated financial
statements.
Note 9. EATON SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
There are 500 million common shares authorized ($.50 par value per share), 339.9 million of
which were issued and outstanding at the end of 2010. At December 31, 2010, there were 8,113
holders of record of common shares. Additionally, 17,463 current and former employees were
shareholders through participation in the Eaton Savings Plan (ESP), Eaton Personal Investment Plan
(EPIP) and Eaton Electrical de Puerto Rico Inc. Retirement Savings Plan.
In 2008, Eaton sold 37.4 million of its common shares in a public offering, resulting in net
cash proceeds of $1.5 billion. The cash proceeds from the sale of the common shares were used to
repay borrowings incurred to fund the acquisitions of Moeller and Phoenixtec.
Eaton has a common share repurchase plan that authorizes the repurchase of 10 million common
shares. The shares are expected to be repurchased over time, depending on market conditions, the
market price of the Companys common shares, the Companys capital levels and other considerations.
In 2008, 2.8 common shares were repurchased in the open market at a total cost of $100. No common shares were repurchased in the open market in 2010 or 2009.
Page 41
Eaton has deferral plans that permit certain employees and directors to defer a portion of
their compensation. A trust contains $9 and $22 of common shares and
marketable securities, as
valued at December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively, to fund a portion of these liabilities. The
marketable securities were included in Other assets and the common shares were included in
Shareholders equity at historical cost.
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss
The components of Accumulated other comprehensive loss as reported in the Consolidated Balance
Sheets follow:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Foreign currency translation and related hedging instruments (net of income tax
benefit of $32 in 2010 and 2009) |
|
$ |
(261 |
) |
|
$ |
(183 |
) |
Pensions (net of income tax benefit of $489 in 2010 and $459 in 2009) |
|
|
(972 |
) |
|
|
(911 |
) |
Other postretirement benefits (net of income tax benefit of $99 in 2010 and
$95 in 2009) |
|
|
(122 |
) |
|
|
(121 |
) |
Cash flow hedges (net of income taxes of $4 in 2010 and 2009) |
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
|
$ |
(1,348 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,208 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income per Common Share
A summary of the calculation of net income per common share attributable to common
shareholders is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Shares in millions) |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Income from continuing operations |
|
$ |
929 |
|
|
$ |
383 |
|
|
$ |
1,055 |
|
Income from discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to common shareholders |
|
$ |
929 |
|
|
$ |
383 |
|
|
$ |
1,058 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average number of common shares outstanding
diluted |
|
|
339.5 |
|
|
|
335.8 |
|
|
|
324.6 |
|
Less dilutive effect of stock options and restricted stock
awards |
|
|
4.0 |
|
|
|
3.1 |
|
|
|
4.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average number of common shares
outstanding basic |
|
|
335.5 |
|
|
|
332.7 |
|
|
|
320.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per common share diluted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing operations |
|
$ |
2.73 |
|
|
$ |
1.14 |
|
|
$ |
3.25 |
|
Discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.01 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
2.73 |
|
|
$ |
1.14 |
|
|
$ |
3.26 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per common share basic |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing operations |
|
$ |
2.76 |
|
|
$ |
1.16 |
|
|
$ |
3.29 |
|
Discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.01 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
2.76 |
|
|
$ |
1.16 |
|
|
$ |
3.30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In 2010 all stock options were dilutive in the calculation of diluted net income per common
share. In 2009 and 2008, 13.2 million and 17.0 million stock options, respectively, were excluded
from the calculation of diluted net income per common share because the exercise price of the
options exceeded the average market price of the common shares during the period and their effect,
accordingly, would have been antidilutive.
Note 10. STOCK OPTIONS AND RESTRICTED STOCK UNITS
Stock Options
Under various plans, stock options have been granted to certain employees and directors to
purchase common shares at prices equal to fair market value on the date of grant. Substantially all
of these options vest ratably during the three-year period following the date of grant and expire
10 years from the date of grant. Compensation expense is recognized for stock options based on the
fair value of the options at the date of grant and amortized on a straight-line basis over the
period the employee or director is required to provide service.
Page 42
The Company uses a Black-Scholes option pricing model to estimate the fair value of stock
options. The principal assumptions utilized in valuing stock options include the expected stock
price volatility (based on the most recent historical period equal to the expected life of the
option); the expected option life (an estimate based on historical experience); the expected
dividend yield; and the risk-free interest rate (an estimate based on the yield of United States
Treasury zero coupon with a maturity equal to the expected life of the option). A summary of the
assumptions used in determining the fair value of stock options follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
Expected volatility |
|
|
31 |
% |
|
|
30 |
% |
|
27% to 22% |
Expected option life in years |
|
|
5.5 |
|
|
|
5.5 |
|
|
|
5.5 |
|
Expected dividend yield |
|
|
2.0 |
% |
|
|
2.0 |
% |
|
|
2.0 |
% |
Risk-free interest rate |
|
|
2.4% to 1.3 |
% |
|
|
2.2% to 1.7 |
% |
|
|
3.6% to 1.7 |
% |
Weighted-average fair value of stock
options granted |
|
$ |
8.98 |
|
|
$ |
5.14 |
|
|
$ |
8.30 |
|
A summary of stock option activity follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
average |
|
|
|
|
Weighted- |
|
|
|
|
|
remaining |
|
|
|
|
average price |
|
|
|
|
|
contractual |
|
Aggregate |
(Options in millions) |
|
per option |
|
Options |
|
life in years |
|
intrinsic value |
Outstanding at January 1, 2010 |
|
$ |
32.19 |
|
|
|
21.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted |
|
|
34.90 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised |
|
|
26.16 |
|
|
|
(6.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited and canceled |
|
|
37.43 |
|
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2010 |
|
$ |
34.62 |
|
|
|
14.9 |
|
|
|
5.1 |
|
|
$ |
241 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable at December 31, 2010 |
|
$ |
34.10 |
|
|
|
13.6 |
|
|
|
4.8 |
|
|
$ |
227 |
|
Reserved for future grants at
December 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The aggregate intrinsic value in the table above represents the total excess of the $50.76
closing price of Eaton common shares on the last trading day of 2010 over the exercise price of the
stock option, multiplied by the related number of options outstanding and exercisable. The
aggregate intrinsic value is not recognized for financial accounting purposes and the value changes
based on the daily changes in the fair market value of the Companys common shares.
Information related to stock options follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
Pretax expense for stock options |
|
$ |
11 |
|
|
$ |
28 |
|
|
$ |
29 |
|
After-tax expense for stock options |
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
Proceeds from stock options exercised |
|
|
157 |
|
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
47 |
|
Income tax benefit related to stock options exercised |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Classified in operating activities in the Consolidated
Statements of Cash Flows |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
Classified in financing activities in the Consolidated
Statements of Cash Flows |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
Intrinsic value of stock options exercised |
|
|
98 |
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
52 |
|
Total fair value of stock options vesting |
|
$ |
11 |
|
|
$ |
22 |
|
|
$ |
31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock options exercised, in millions of options |
|
|
6.096 |
|
|
|
1.688 |
|
|
|
2.480 |
|
As of December 31, 2010, total compensation expense not yet recognized related to non-vested
stock options was $3, and the weighted-average period in which the expense is expected to be
recognized is 1.2 years.
Page 43
Restricted Stock Units
Restricted stock units and awards (RSUs) have been issued to certain employees at fair market
value at the date of grant. These awards entitle the holder to receive one common share for each
RSU upon vesting, generally over four years. A summary of the RSU activity for 2010 follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted- |
|
|
|
Number of |
|
|
average fair |
|
|
|
restricted |
|
|
value per |
|
(Restricted stock units in millions) |
|
stock units |
|
|
award |
|
Non-vested at January 1, 2010 |
|
|
4.2 |
|
|
$ |
24.30 |
|
Granted |
|
|
1.8 |
|
|
|
33.28 |
|
Vested |
|
|
(0.8 |
) |
|
|
31.36 |
|
Forfeited |
|
|
|
|
|
|
25.11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-vested at December 31, 2010 |
|
|
5.2 |
|
|
$ |
26.48 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Information related to RSUs follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
Pretax expense for RSUs |
|
$ |
39 |
|
|
$ |
25 |
|
|
$ |
15 |
|
After-tax expense for RSUs |
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
As of December 31, 2010, total compensation expense not yet recognized related to non-vested
RSUs was $85, and the weighted-average period in which the expense is expected to be recognized is
2.7 years.
Note 11. FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
Fair value is measured based on an exit price, representing the amount that would be received
to sell an asset or paid to satisfy a liability in an orderly transaction between market
participants. As such, fair value is a market-based measurement that should be determined based on
assumptions that market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability. As a basis for
considering such assumptions, a fair value hierarchy is established, which categorizes the inputs
used in measuring fair value as follows: (Level 1) observable inputs such as quoted prices in
active markets; (Level 2) inputs, other than the quoted prices in active markets, that are
observable either directly or indirectly; and (Level 3) unobservable inputs in which there is
little or no market data, which require the reporting entity to develop its own assumptions.
A summary of financial instruments recognized at fair value, and the fair value measurement
used, at December 31, 2010 and 2009 follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted prices in |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
active markets |
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for identical |
|
|
observable |
|
|
Unobservable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
assets |
|
|
inputs |
|
|
inputs |
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
(Level 1) |
|
|
(Level 2) |
|
|
(Level 3) |
|
2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash |
|
$ |
333 |
|
|
$ |
333 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Short-term investments |
|
|
838 |
|
|
|
838 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net derivative contracts |
|
|
69 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
69 |
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt converted to
floating interest rates by
interest rate swaps |
|
|
42 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
42 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash |
|
$ |
340 |
|
|
$ |
340 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Short-term investments |
|
|
433 |
|
|
|
433 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net derivative contracts |
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt converted to
floating interest rates by
interest rate swaps |
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
|
|
Eaton values its financial instruments using an industry standard market approach, in which
prices and other relevant information is generated by market transactions involving identical or
comparable assets or liabilities. No financial instruments were recognized using unobservable
inputs.
Page 44
Long-term debt and the current portion of long-term debt had a carrying value of $3,386 and fair
value of $3,787 at December 31, 2010 compared to $3,354 and $3,601, respectively, at December 31,
2009.
Short-Term Investments
Eaton invests excess cash generated from operations in short-term marketable investments. For
those investments classified as available-for-sale, Eaton marks these investments to fair value
with the offset recognized in Accumulated other comprehensive loss. A summary of the
carrying value of short-term investments follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Time deposits and certificate of
deposits with banks |
|
$ |
592 |
|
|
$ |
300 |
|
Money market investments |
|
|
246 |
|
|
|
125 |
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total short-term investments |
|
$ |
838 |
|
|
$ |
433 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 12. DERIVATIVE FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS AND HEDGING ACTIVITIES
In the normal course of business, Eaton is exposed to certain risks related to fluctuations in
interest rates, foreign currency exchange rates and commodity prices. The Company uses various
derivative and non-derivative financial instruments, primarily interest rate swaps, foreign
currency forward exchange contracts, foreign currency swaps and, to a lesser extent, commodity
contracts, to manage risks from these market fluctuations. The instruments used by Eaton are
straightforward, non-leveraged instruments. The counterparties to these instruments are financial
institutions with strong credit ratings. Eaton maintains control over the size of positions entered
into with any one counterparty and regularly monitors the credit rating of these institutions. Such
instruments are not purchased and sold for trading purposes.
Derivative financial instruments are accounted for at fair value and recognized as assets or
liabilities in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. Accounting for the gain or loss resulting from the
change in the fair value of the derivative financial instrument depends on whether it has been
designated, and is effective, as part of a hedging relationship and, if so, as to the nature of the
hedging activity. Eaton formally documents all relationships between derivative financial
instruments accounted for as hedges and the hedged item, as well as its risk-management objective
and strategy for undertaking the hedge transaction. This process includes linking all derivative
financial instruments to a recognized asset or liability, specific firm commitment, forecasted
transaction, or net investment in a foreign operation. These financial instruments can be
designated as:
|
|
|
Hedges of the change in the fair value of a recognized fixed-rate asset or liability, or
the firm commitment to acquire such an asset or liability (a fair value hedge); for these
hedges, the gain or loss from the derivative financial instrument, as well as the
offsetting loss or gain on the hedged item attributable to the hedged risk, are recognized
in income during the period of change in fair value. |
|
|
|
Hedges of the variable cash flows of a recognized variable-rate asset or liability, or
the forecasted acquisition of such an asset or liability (a cash flow hedge); for these
hedges, the effective portion of the gain or loss from the derivative financial instrument
is recognized in Accumulated other comprehensive loss and reclassified to income in the
same period when the gain or loss on the hedged item is included in income. |
|
|
|
Hedges of the foreign currency exposure related to a net investment in a foreign
operation (a net investment hedge); for these hedges, the effective portion of the gain or
loss from the derivative financial instrument is recognized in Accumulated other
comprehensive loss and reclassified to income in the same period when the gain or loss
related to the net investment in the foreign operation is included in income. |
The gain or loss from a derivative financial instrument designated as a hedge that is
effective is classified in the same line of the Consolidated Statements of Income as the offsetting
loss or gain on the hedged item. The change in fair value of a derivative financial instrument that
is not effective as a hedge is immediately recognized in income.
For derivatives that are not designated as a hedge, any gain or loss is immediately recognized
in income. The majority of derivatives used in this manner relate to risks resulting from assets or
liabilities denominated in a foreign currency and certain commodity contracts that arise in the
normal course of business.
Page 45
Interest Rate Risk
Eaton has entered into fixed-to-floating interest rate swaps to manage interest rate risk.
These interest rate swaps are accounted for as fair value hedges of certain long-term debt. The
maturity of the swap corresponds with the maturity of the debt instrument as noted in the table of
long-term debt in Note 5.
A summary of interest rate swaps outstanding at December 31, 2010, follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notional |
|
Fixed interest |
|
Floating interest |
|
Basis for contracted floating |
amount |
|
rate received |
|
rate paid |
|
interest rate paid |
$ |
200 |
|
|
|
4.90 |
% |
|
|
2.59 |
% |
|
6 month LIBOR + 2.15% |
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
5.95 |
% |
|
|
3.07 |
% |
|
6 month LIBOR + 2.60% |
|
|
|
115 |
|
|
|
5.60 |
% |
|
|
1.66 |
% |
|
6 month LIBOR + 1.22% |
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
8.875 |
% |
|
|
4.30 |
% |
|
6 month LIBOR + 3.84% |
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
7.625 |
% |
|
|
2.94 |
% |
|
6 month LIBOR + 2.48% |
|
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
7.65 |
% |
|
|
3.01 |
% |
|
6 month LIBOR + 2.57% |
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
5.45 |
% |
|
|
0.73 |
% |
|
6 month LIBOR + 0.28% |
|
|
Derivative Financial Statement Impacts
The fair value of derivative financial instruments recognized in the Consolidated Balance
Sheets follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
Other |
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notional |
|
|
current |
|
|
long-term |
|
|
current |
|
|
Type of |
|
|
|
|
|
amount |
|
|
assets |
|
|
assets |
|
|
liabilities |
|
|
hedge |
|
|
Term |
2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives designated as hedges |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed-to-floating interest rate
swaps |
|
$ |
540 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
42 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
Fair value |
|
2 to 23 years |
Foreign currency exchange
contracts |
|
|
227 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
Cash flow |
|
12 to 36 months |
Commodity contracts |
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flow |
|
12 months |
Cross currency swaps |
|
|
75 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net investment |
|
12 months |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
14 |
|
|
$ |
42 |
|
|
$ |
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives not designated as hedges |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency exchange
contracts |
|
$ |
2,777 |
|
|
$ |
20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
19 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
12 months |
Commodity contracts |
|
|
102 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12 months |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
37 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
19 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives designated as hedges |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed-to-floating interest rate
swaps |
|
$ |
700 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
29 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
Fair value |
|
3 to 24 years |
Foreign currency exchange
contracts |
|
|
159 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
Cash flow |
|
12 to 36 months |
Commodity contracts |
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flow |
|
12 months |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
11 |
|
|
$ |
29 |
|
|
$ |
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives not designated as hedges |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency exchange
contracts |
|
$ |
3,602 |
|
|
$ |
17 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
12 months |
Commodity contracts |
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12 months |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The foreign currency exchange contracts shown in the table above as derivatives not designated
as hedges are primarily contracts entered into to manage foreign currency volatility or exposure on
intercompany sales and loans. While Eaton does not elect hedge accounting treatment for these
derivatives, Eaton targets managing 100% of the intercompany balance sheet exposure to minimize the
effect of currency volatility related to the movement of goods and services in the normal course of
its operations. This activity represents the great majority of these foreign currency exchange
contracts.
Page 46
Amounts recognized in Accumulated other comprehensive loss follow:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain (loss) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain (loss) |
|
|
|
Gain (loss) |
|
|
reclassified |
|
|
Gain (loss) |
|
|
reclassified |
|
|
|
recognized in |
|
|
from |
|
|
recognized in |
|
|
from |
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
other |
|
|
other |
|
|
other |
|
|
other |
|
|
|
comprehensive |
|
|
comprehensive |
|
|
comprehensive |
|
|
comprehensive |
|
|
|
loss |
|
|
loss |
|
|
loss |
|
|
loss |
|
Derivatives designated as cash flow
hedges |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency exchange
contracts |
|
$ |
(2 |
) |
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
$ |
(1 |
) |
|
$ |
(8 |
) |
Commodity contracts |
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
(14 |
) |
Derivatives designated as net
investment hedges |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cross currency swaps |
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
(2 |
) |
|
$ |
6 |
|
|
$ |
21 |
|
|
$ |
(22 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gains
and losses reclassified from Accumulated other comprehensive loss to the Consolidated Statements of
Income were recognized in Cost of products sold.
Amounts recognized in net income follow:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain (loss) recognized in net |
|
|
|
income |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Derivatives designated as fair
value hedges |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed-to-floating interest rate swaps |
|
$ |
33 |
|
|
$ |
(47 |
) |
Related long-term debt converted
to floating interest rates by
interest rate swaps |
|
|
(33 |
) |
|
|
47 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gains and losses described above were recognized in Interest expense.
Cash received from the early termination of interest rate swaps totaled $22, $15 and $85 for
the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
Note 13. ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE AND INVENTORY
Accounts Receivable
Eaton performs ongoing credit evaluation of its customers and maintains sufficient allowances
for potential credit losses. The Company evaluates the collectability of its accounts receivable
based on the length of time the receivable is past due and any anticipated future write-off based
on historic experience. Accounts receivable balances are written off against an allowance for
doubtful accounts after a final determination of uncollectability has been made. Accounts
receivable are net of an allowance for doubtful accounts of $51 and $67 at December 31, 2010 and
2009, respectively.
Inventory
Inventory is carried at lower of cost or market. Inventory in the United States is generally
accounted for using the last-in, first-out (LIFO) method. Remaining United States and non-United
States inventory is accounted for using the first-in, first-out (FIFO) method. Cost components
include raw materials, purchased components, direct labor, indirect labor, utilities, depreciation,
inbound freight charges, purchasing and receiving costs, inspection costs, warehousing costs, and
costs of the distribution network.
Page 47
The components of inventory follow:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Raw materials |
|
$ |
651 |
|
|
$ |
608 |
|
Work-in-process |
|
|
229 |
|
|
|
222 |
|
Finished goods |
|
|
800 |
|
|
|
601 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inventory at FIFO |
|
|
1,680 |
|
|
|
1,431 |
|
Excess of FIFO over LIFO cost |
|
|
(116 |
) |
|
|
(105 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total inventory |
|
$ |
1,564 |
|
|
$ |
1,326 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inventory at FIFO accounted for using the LIFO method was 40% and 46% at the end of 2010 and
2009, respectively. The increase in inventory is a result of returning to normal operating levels
in 2010 as compared to depressed levels in 2009.
Note 14. BUSINESS SEGMENT AND GEOGRAPHIC REGION INFORMATION
Operating segments are defined as components of an enterprise about which separate financial
information is available that is evaluated on a regular basis by the chief operating decision
maker, or decision making group, in deciding how to allocate resources to an individual segment and
in assessing performance. Eatons segments are as follows:
Electrical Americas and Electrical Rest of World
The Electrical segments are global leaders in electrical components and systems for power
quality, distribution and control. Products include circuit breakers, switchgear, UPS systems,
power distribution units, panelboards, loadcenters, motor controls, meters, sensors, relays and
inverters. The principal markets for the Electrical Americas and Electrical Rest of World segments
are industrial, institutional, governmental, utility, commercial, residential and information
technology. These products are used wherever there is a demand for electrical power in commercial
buildings, data centers, residences, apartment and office buildings, hospitals, factories and
utilities. The segments share several common global customers, but a large number of customers are
located regionally and sales are made directly to original equipment manufacturers and indirectly
through distributors, resellers and manufacturers representatives.
Hydraulics
The Hydraulics segment is a global leader in hydraulics components, systems and services for
industrial and mobile equipment. Eaton offers a wide range of power products including pumps,
motors and hydraulic power units; a broad range of controls and sensing products including valves,
cylinders and electronic controls; a full range of fluid conveyance products including industrial
and hydraulic hose, fittings, and assemblies, thermoplastic hose and tubing, couplings, connectors,
and assembly equipment; filtration systems solutions; heavy-duty drum and disc brakes; and golf
grips. The principal markets for Hydraulics include oil and gas, renewable energy, marine,
agriculture, construction, mining, forestry, utility, material handling, truck and bus, machine
tools, molding, primary metals and power generation. Key manufacturing customers in these markets
and other customers are located globally, and these products are sold and serviced through a
variety of channels.
Aerospace
The Aerospace segment is a leading global supplier of aerospace fuel, hydraulics and pneumatic
systems for commercial and military use. Products include hydraulic power generation systems for
aerospace applications including pumps, motors, hydraulic power units, hose and fittings,
electro-hydraulic pumps and power and load management systems; controls and sensing products
including valves, cylinders, electronic controls, electromechanical actuators, sensors, displays
and panels, aircraft flap and slat systems and nose wheel steering systems; fluid conveyance
products, including hose, thermoplastic tubing, fittings, adapters, couplings, sealing and ducting;
and fuel systems including fuel pumps, sensors, valves, adapters and regulators. The principal
markets for the Aerospace segment are manufacturers of commercial and military aircraft and related
after-market customers. These manufacturers and other customers operate globally, and these
products are sold and serviced through a variety of channels.
Truck
The Truck segment is a leader in the design, manufacture and marketing of a complete line of
drivetrain and powertrain systems and components for performance, fuel economy and safety for
commercial vehicles. Products include transmissions, clutches and hybrid electric power systems.
The principal markets for the Truck segment are original equipment manufacturers and after-market
customers of heavy, medium and light-duty trucks and passenger cars. These manufacturers and other
customers are located globally, and most sales of these products are made directly to these
customers.
Page 48
Automotive
The Automotive segment is a leading supplier of automotive drivetrain and powertrain systems
for performance, fuel economy and safety including critical components that reduce emissions and
fuel consumption and improve stability, performance, fuel economy and safety of cars, light trucks
and commercial vehicles. Products include superchargers, engine valves and valve actuation systems,
cylinder heads, locking and limited slip differentials, transmission controls, engine controls,
fuel vapor components, compressor control clutches for mobile refrigeration, fluid connectors and
hoses for air conditioning and power steering, decorative spoilers, underhood plastic components,
fluid conveyance products including, hose, thermoplastic tubing, fittings, adapters, couplings and
sealing products to the global automotive industry. The principal markets for the Automotive
segment are original equipment manufacturers and aftermarket customers of light-duty trucks, SUVs,
CUVs, and passenger cars. These manufacturers and other customers are located globally, and most
sales of these products are made directly to these customers.
Other Information
No single customer represented greater than 10% of net sales in 2010, 2009 or 2008,
respectively.
The accounting policies of the business segments are generally the same as the policies
described in Note 1, except that inventories and related cost of products sold of the segments are
accounted for using the FIFO method and operating profit only reflects the service cost component
related to pensions and other postretirement benefits. Intersegment sales and transfers are
accounted for at the same prices as if the sales and transfers were made to third parties. These
intersegment sales are eliminated in consolidation.
For purposes of business segment performance measurement, the Company does not allocate items
that are of a non-operating nature, or corporate organizational and functional expenses of a
governance nature. Corporate expenses consist of corporate office expenses including compensation,
benefits, occupancy, depreciation, and other administrative costs. Identifiable assets of the
business segments exclude goodwill, other intangible assets, and general corporate assets, which
principally consist of cash, short-term investments, deferred income taxes, certain accounts
receivable, certain property, plant and equipment, and certain other assets.
Page 49
Business Segment Information
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Net sales |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Electrical Americas |
|
$ |
3,675 |
|
|
$ |
3,410 |
|
|
$ |
4,016 |
|
Electrical Rest of World |
|
|
2,748 |
|
|
|
2,483 |
|
|
|
2,904 |
|
Hydraulics |
|
|
2,212 |
|
|
|
1,692 |
|
|
|
2,523 |
|
Aerospace |
|
|
1,536 |
|
|
|
1,602 |
|
|
|
1,811 |
|
Truck |
|
|
1,997 |
|
|
|
1,457 |
|
|
|
2,251 |
|
Automotive |
|
|
1,547 |
|
|
|
1,229 |
|
|
|
1,871 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net sales |
|
$ |
13,715 |
|
|
$ |
11,873 |
|
|
$ |
15,376 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment operating profit (loss) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Electrical Americas |
|
$ |
529 |
|
|
$ |
518 |
|
|
$ |
630 |
|
Electrical Rest of World |
|
|
264 |
|
|
|
107 |
|
|
|
233 |
|
Hydraulics |
|
|
279 |
|
|
|
51 |
|
|
|
285 |
|
Aerospace |
|
|
220 |
|
|
|
245 |
|
|
|
283 |
|
Truck |
|
|
245 |
|
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
315 |
|
Automotive |
|
|
163 |
|
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
59 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total segment operating profit |
|
|
1,700 |
|
|
|
950 |
|
|
|
1,805 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of intangible assets |
|
|
(181 |
) |
|
|
(170 |
) |
|
|
(161 |
) |
Interest expense-net |
|
|
(136 |
) |
|
|
(150 |
) |
|
|
(157 |
) |
Pension and other postretirement benefits expense |
|
|
(120 |
) |
|
|
(212 |
) |
|
|
(141 |
) |
Stock option expense |
|
|
(11 |
) |
|
|
(28 |
) |
|
|
(29 |
) |
Other corporate expense-net |
|
|
(216 |
) |
|
|
(87 |
) |
|
|
(177 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations before income
taxes |
|
|
1,036 |
|
|
|
303 |
|
|
|
1,140 |
|
Income tax expense (benefit) |
|
|
99 |
|
|
|
(82 |
) |
|
|
73 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations |
|
|
937 |
|
|
|
385 |
|
|
|
1,067 |
|
Income from discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
937 |
|
|
|
385 |
|
|
|
1,070 |
|
Less net income for noncontrolling interests |
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
(12 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to Eaton common shareholders |
|
$ |
929 |
|
|
$ |
383 |
|
|
$ |
1,058 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Business segment operating profit was reduced by
acquisition integration charges as follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Electrical Americas |
|
$ |
2 |
|
|
$ |
4 |
|
|
$ |
4 |
|
Electrical Rest of World |
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
60 |
|
|
|
43 |
|
Hydraulics |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
Aerospace |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
Automotive |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
40 |
|
|
$ |
80 |
|
|
$ |
76 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page 50
Business Segment Information
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Identifiable assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Electrical Americas |
|
$ |
1,272 |
|
|
$ |
1,050 |
|
|
$ |
1,238 |
|
Electrical Rest of World |
|
|
1,630 |
|
|
|
1,625 |
|
|
|
1,817 |
|
Hydraulics |
|
|
1,080 |
|
|
|
939 |
|
|
|
1,132 |
|
Aerospace |
|
|
726 |
|
|
|
729 |
|
|
|
798 |
|
Truck |
|
|
866 |
|
|
|
797 |
|
|
|
801 |
|
Automotive |
|
|
904 |
|
|
|
866 |
|
|
|
947 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total identifiable assets |
|
|
6,478 |
|
|
|
6,006 |
|
|
|
6,733 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
5,454 |
|
|
|
5,435 |
|
|
|
5,232 |
|
Other intangible assets |
|
|
2,272 |
|
|
|
2,441 |
|
|
|
2,518 |
|
Corporate |
|
|
3,048 |
|
|
|
2,400 |
|
|
|
2,172 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
17,252 |
|
|
$ |
16,282 |
|
|
$ |
16,655 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures for property, plant and equipment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Electrical Americas |
|
$ |
59 |
|
|
$ |
30 |
|
|
$ |
85 |
|
Electrical Rest of World |
|
|
49 |
|
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
77 |
|
Hydraulics |
|
|
45 |
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
54 |
|
Aerospace |
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
23 |
|
Truck |
|
|
59 |
|
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
69 |
|
Automotive |
|
|
61 |
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
54 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
294 |
|
|
|
160 |
|
|
|
362 |
|
Corporate |
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
86 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total expenditures for property, plant and equipment |
|
$ |
394 |
|
|
$ |
195 |
|
|
$ |
448 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation of property, plant and equipment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Electrical Americas |
|
$ |
55 |
|
|
$ |
56 |
|
|
$ |
61 |
|
Electrical Rest of World |
|
|
56 |
|
|
|
61 |
|
|
|
49 |
|
Hydraulics |
|
|
52 |
|
|
|
57 |
|
|
|
59 |
|
Aerospace |
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
27 |
|
Truck |
|
|
76 |
|
|
|
83 |
|
|
|
89 |
|
Automotive |
|
|
77 |
|
|
|
85 |
|
|
|
97 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
341 |
|
|
|
368 |
|
|
|
382 |
|
Corporate |
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total depreciation of property, plant and equipment |
|
$ |
369 |
|
|
$ |
398 |
|
|
$ |
409 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page 51
Geographic Region Information
Net sales are measured based on the geographic location of the selling plant. Long-lived
assets consist of property, plant and equipment-net.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-lived |
|
|
|
Net sales |
|
|
assets |
|
2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States |
|
$ |
7,686 |
|
|
$ |
1,102 |
|
Canada |
|
|
426 |
|
|
|
25 |
|
Latin America |
|
|
1,453 |
|
|
|
275 |
|
Europe |
|
|
3,396 |
|
|
|
664 |
|
Asia Pacific |
|
|
2,156 |
|
|
|
411 |
|
Eliminations |
|
|
(1,402 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
13,715 |
|
|
$ |
2,477 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States |
|
$ |
6,767 |
|
|
$ |
1,024 |
|
Canada |
|
|
355 |
|
|
|
23 |
|
Latin America |
|
|
1,061 |
|
|
|
272 |
|
Europe |
|
|
3,007 |
|
|
|
748 |
|
Asia Pacific |
|
|
1,642 |
|
|
|
378 |
|
Eliminations |
|
|
(959 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
11,873 |
|
|
$ |
2,445 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States |
|
$ |
8,775 |
|
|
$ |
1,129 |
|
Canada |
|
|
428 |
|
|
|
21 |
|
Latin America |
|
|
1,455 |
|
|
|
250 |
|
Europe |
|
|
4,002 |
|
|
|
827 |
|
Asia Pacific |
|
|
1,963 |
|
|
|
412 |
|
Eliminations |
|
|
(1,247 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
15,376 |
|
|
$ |
2,639 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Eaton generally manufactures and sells within the same geographic region. However, in some
cases, production occurs in one region for sales to customers in another region. For 2010, Eatons
sales to customers within the United States were $6,166 and sales to customers outside of the
United States were $7,549. For 2009, Eatons sales to customers within the United States were
$5,574 and sales to customers outside of the United States were $6,299. For 2008, Eatons sales to
customers within the United States were $7,277 and sales to customers outside of the United States
were $8,099.
Page 52
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Amounts are in millions of dollars or shares unless indicated otherwise (per share data
assume dilution).
TWO-FOR-ONE STOCK SPLIT
On January 27, 2011, Eatons Board of Directors announced a two-for-one split of the Companys
common shares effective in the form of a 100% stock dividend. The record date for the stock split
was February 7, 2011, and the additional shares will be distributed on February 28, 2011.
Accordingly, all share and per share data have been adjusted retroactively to reflect the stock
split.
COMPANY OVERVIEW
Eaton Corporation (Eaton or Company) is a diversified power management company with 2010 sales
of $13.7 billion. The Company is a global technology leader in electrical components and systems
for power quality, distribution and control; hydraulics components, systems and services for
industrial and mobile equipment; aerospace fuel, hydraulics and pneumatic systems for commercial
and military use; and truck and automotive drivetrain and powertrain systems for performance, fuel
economy and safety. Eaton has approximately 70,000 employees in over 50 countries, and sells
products to customers in more than 150 countries.
Eatons operating segments are Electrical Americas, Electrical Rest of World, Hydraulics,
Aerospace, Truck and Automotive. These segments are components of the Company with separate
financial information that is evaluated on a regular basis by the chief operating decision maker in
determining how to allocate resources. For additional information regarding Eatons business
segments, see Note 14 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
During 2009 and the latter part of 2008, Eaton experienced significant challenges due to the
global recession and instability in the financial and capital markets, which had a significant
impact on the demand for Eatons products. In response to these events, and to remain competitive
in the marketplace, substantial changes have been made to the Companys cost structure, including a
17% full-time workforce reduction in 2009, as well as other cost-containment actions. In
2010, the Company experienced a return to growth in end markets, higher demand for products and
overall improved operating results due to better economic conditions and the cost-containment
actions initiated in 2009.
Eaton acquired certain businesses that affect comparability on a year over year basis. The
Consolidated Statements of Income include the results of these businesses from the dates of the
transactions. For a complete list of business acquisitions and joint ventures, see Note 2 to the
Consolidated Financial Statements.
A summary of Eatons consolidated net sales, net income attributable to Eaton common
shareholders, and net income per common share follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
Consolidated net sales |
|
$ |
13,715 |
|
|
$ |
11,873 |
|
|
$ |
15,376 |
|
Net income attributable to Eaton
common shareholders |
|
|
929 |
|
|
|
383 |
|
|
|
1,058 |
|
Net income per common share |
|
$ |
2.73 |
|
|
$ |
1.14 |
|
|
$ |
3.26 |
|
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The following discussion of Consolidated Financial Results and Business Segment Results of
Operations includes certain non-GAAP financial measures. These measures include operating earnings,
operating earnings per common share, and operating profit before acquisition integration charges
for each business segment, each of which excludes amounts that differ from the most directly
comparable measure calculated in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP). A
reconciliation of each of these financial measures to the most directly comparable GAAP measure is
included in the table below and in the discussion of the operating results of each business
segment. Management believes that these financial measures are useful to investors because they
exclude transactions of an unusual nature, allowing investors to more easily compare Eatons
financial performance period to period. Management uses this information in monitoring and
evaluating the on-going performance of Eaton and each business segment.
Page 53
Consolidated Financial Results
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
from |
|
|
|
|
|
|
from |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Continuing operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales |
|
$ |
13,715 |
|
|
|
16 |
% |
|
$ |
11,873 |
|
|
|
(23 |
)% |
|
$ |
15,376 |
|
Gross profit |
|
|
4,082 |
|
|
|
32 |
% |
|
|
3,091 |
|
|
|
(26 |
)% |
|
|
4,185 |
|
Percent of net sales |
|
|
29.8 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
26.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
27.2 |
% |
Income before income taxes |
|
|
1,036 |
|
|
|
242 |
% |
|
|
303 |
|
|
|
(73 |
)% |
|
|
1,140 |
|
Income after income taxes |
|
$ |
937 |
|
|
|
143 |
% |
|
$ |
385 |
|
|
|
(64 |
)% |
|
$ |
1,067 |
|
Income from discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
937 |
|
|
|
143 |
% |
|
|
385 |
|
|
|
(64 |
)% |
|
|
1,070 |
|
Less net income for noncontrolling interests |
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to Eaton common
shareholders |
|
|
929 |
|
|
|
143 |
% |
|
|
383 |
|
|
|
(64 |
)% |
|
|
1,058 |
|
Excluding acquisition integration charges (after-tax) |
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
54 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
51 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating earnings |
|
$ |
956 |
|
|
|
119 |
% |
|
$ |
437 |
|
|
|
(61 |
)% |
|
$ |
1,109 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per common share diluted |
|
$ |
2.73 |
|
|
|
141 |
% |
|
$ |
1.14 |
|
|
|
(65 |
)% |
|
$ |
3.25 |
|
Excluding per share impact of acquisition
integration charges (after-tax) |
|
|
0.08 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.17 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating earnings per common share |
|
$ |
2.81 |
|
|
|
117 |
% |
|
$ |
1.30 |
|
|
|
(62 |
)% |
|
$ |
3.42 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Sales
Net sales in 2010 increased by 16% compared to 2009 due to 14% higher core sales, an increase
of 1% from the impact of foreign exchange, and an increase of 1% from acquisitions of businesses.
Contributing to higher core sales was increased demand in end markets, which increased sales 12% in
2010 compared to 2009. Higher demand resulted from a rebound from the depressed end market levels
of 2009 and growth in revenues from developing countries. Net sales in 2009 declined 23% compared
to 2008. A reduction in core sales due to the global economic recession drove 22% of the
23% decline. Additionally, net sales were negatively impacted by 3% from foreign exchange partially
offset by a 2% increase from sales of acquired businesses.
Gross Profit
Gross profit increased by 32% in 2010 compared to 2009, and improved to 29.8% as a percentage
of net sales, up 3.8 percentage points from 2009. The increase was primarily due to higher sales in
2010, manufacturing efficiencies resulting from higher sales volumes, and the benefits of
substantial changes in the Companys cost structure implemented over the past two years, partially
offset by higher raw material and commodity costs. The Companys cost structure reflects savings
associated with workforce reductions taken in 2009. Additionally, contributing to higher gross
profit in 2010 is the absence of charges for severance and pension and other postretirement
benefits expense incurred in 2009, as discussed below. Gross profit declined 26% in 2009 compared
to 2008, primarily due to the decline in net sales discussed above, operating inefficiencies
related to the difficulty in absorbing fixed manufacturing costs resulting from reduced sales, and
charges of $182 in 2009 resulting from actions taken to reduce the workforce including related
pension settlement and curtailment expense, a substantial portion of which was recognized in Cost
of products sold. These reductions were partially offset by savings associated with workforce
reductions, other cost-containment actions and benefits associated with integrating acquired
businesses.
Income Taxes
The effective income tax expense rate for 2010 was 9.5% compared to an income tax benefit rate
of (27.2)% in 2009 and an income tax expense rate of 6.4% in 2008. The increased tax rate in 2010
compared to 2009 is primarily attributable to higher U.S. income at the higher relative U.S. tax
rate, a one-time, non-cash charge of $22 to reflect the impact of the Health Care Reform and
Education Reconciliation Act on taxation associated with Medicare Part D, and adjustments of $22
related to an income tax audit of transfer pricing for the period 2005 to 2009, partially offset by
the successful resolution of international tax audit issues, the recognition of state and local
income tax benefits involving tax loss carry-forwards and the recognition of additional
international deferred tax assets. The income tax benefit rate for 2009 was favorably impacted by
tax benefits of $104 from United States federal income tax losses. Eaton also recognized income
tax benefits of $13 in 2009, which represented adjustments to certain worldwide tax liabilities and
valuation allowances and
Page 54
benefits related to the settlement of international income tax audits. The
lower income tax rate in 2009 compared to 2008 is primarily
attributable to tax benefits from U.S. federal income tax losses in
2009 and the favorable impact of non-U.S. operations tax rate
differential being applied to significantly lower worldwide income as
compared to 2008. For additional information on income taxes, see Note 8 to the Consolidated Financial
Statements.
Net Income
Net income of $929 in 2010 increased 143% compared to net income of $383 in 2009 and net
income per share of $2.73 in 2010 increased 141% over net income per share of $1.14 in 2009. The
increases were primarily due to higher sales in 2010 and the factors that affected gross profit,
partially offset by higher income tax expense in 2010 as discussed above. Net income in 2010 was
unfavorably impacted by a $36 pretax charge related to a legal judgment in Brazil. See Other
Matters for additional information related to this legal judgment. Net income of $383 in 2009 and
net income per common share of $1.14 declined 64% and 65%, respectively, compared to net income of
$1,058 and net income per share of $3.25 in 2008. The declines were primarily due to lower net
sales in 2009 and the factors that affected gross profit discussed above, partially offset by an
income tax benefit rate of 27.2% in 2009 compared to an effective income tax expense rate of 6.4%
in 2008. Net income per share was also reduced due to a higher number of average shares outstanding
in 2009 compared to 2008, resulting principally from the sale of 37.4 million shares in 2008.
Business Segment Results of Operations
The following is a discussion of net sales, operating profit and operating profit margin by
business segment which includes a discussion of operating profit and operating profit margin
without acquisition integration charges. For additional information related to integration charges
see Note 3 to the Consolidated Financial Statements. For additional information related to acquired
businesses see Note 2 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Electrical Americas
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change |
|
|
|
|
|
Change |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
from |
|
|
|
|
|
from |
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
2008 |
Net sales |
|
$ |
3,675 |
|
|
|
8 |
% |
|
$ |
3,410 |
|
|
|
(15 |
)% |
|
$ |
4,016 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating profit |
|
|
529 |
|
|
|
2 |
% |
|
|
518 |
|
|
|
(18 |
)% |
|
|
630 |
|
Operating margin |
|
|
14.4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
15.2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
15.7 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition integration charges |
|
$ |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Before acquisition integration charges |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating profit |
|
$ |
531 |
|
|
|
2 |
% |
|
$ |
522 |
|
|
|
(18 |
)% |
|
$ |
634 |
|
Operating margin |
|
|
14.4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
15.3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
15.8 |
% |
Net sales increased 8% in 2010 compared to 2009 due to an increase in core sales of 5%, an
increase of 1% from the favorable impact of foreign exchange, and an increase of 2% from the
acquisitions of businesses. Contributing to stronger sales in 2010 was growth in the power quality
and industrial control businesses, rebounding from the depressed end market levels of 2009, as well
as sales related to government stimulus programs. This increase in sales was partially offset by a
decline in non-residential electrical end markets. Net sales declined 15% in 2009 compared to 2008
due to a 14% decline in core sales and a 1% negative impact of foreign exchange. The decline in
core sales was driven primarily by weakness in non-residential and residential construction
electrical markets during 2009 due to the global economic recession. The decline in end markets in
2009 reflected lower private non-residential construction spending in the United States, which
declined by 23% in 2009.
Operating profit before acquisition integration charges in 2010 increased 2% from 2009 largely
due to the increase in sales during 2010, net savings resulting from workforce reductions taken in
2009, and manufacturing efficiencies resulting from higher sales volumes. These increases were
partially offset by the cessation of temporary cost-savings measures introduced in 2009, higher raw
material costs, and increased support costs as operations returned to normal operating levels
compared to the depressed levels in 2009. Operating profit before acquisition integration charges
in 2009 decreased 18% from 2008 due to the decline in net sales discussed above, partially offset
by net savings resulting from the workforce reductions and other cost-containment actions.
Page 55
Electrical Rest of World
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change |
|
|
|
|
|
Change |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
from |
|
|
|
|
|
from |
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
2008 |
Net sales |
|
$ |
2,748 |
|
|
|
11 |
% |
|
$ |
2,483 |
|
|
|
(15 |
)% |
|
$ |
2,904 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating profit |
|
|
264 |
|
|
|
147 |
% |
|
|
107 |
|
|
|
(54 |
)% |
|
|
233 |
|
Operating margin |
|
|
9.6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition integration charges |
|
$ |
33 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
60 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
43 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Before acquisition integration charges |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating profit |
|
$ |
297 |
|
|
|
78 |
% |
|
$ |
167 |
|
|
|
(39 |
)% |
|
$ |
276 |
|
Operating margin |
|
|
10.8 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.7 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
9.5 |
% |
Net sales increased 11% in 2010 compared to 2009 due to an increase in core sales of 11% and
an increase of 1% from the acquisition of certain businesses, partially offset by a 1% reduction
from foreign exchange. The growth in core sales was due to the rebound in European and Asian end
markets from the depressed levels of 2009. Net sales declined 15% in 2009 compared to 2008 due to a
19% decline in core sales and a 5% decline from foreign exchange, partially offset by a 9% increase
from the acquisition of certain businesses. The decline in core sales was due to softness in
European and Asian markets during 2009 due to the global economic recession.
Operating profit before acquisition integration charges in 2010 increased 78% from 2009
largely due to the increase in sales during 2010, net savings resulting from workforce reductions
taken in 2009, and manufacturing efficiencies resulting from higher sales volumes. These increases
were partially offset by the cessation of temporary cost-savings measures introduced in 2009, and
increased support costs as operations returned to normal operating levels compared to the depressed
levels in 2009. Operating profit before acquisition integration charges in 2009 decreased 39% from
2008 due to the decline in net sales discussed above, unabsorbed fixed costs resulting from
significant sales reductions, and changes in sales mix, partially offset by net savings resulting
from the workforce reductions and other cost-containment actions.
Hydraulics
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change |
|
|
|
|
|
Change |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
from |
|
|
|
|
|
from |
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
2008 |
Net sales |
|
$ |
2,212 |
|
|
|
31 |
% |
|
$ |
1,692 |
|
|
|
(33 |
)% |
|
$ |
2,523 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating profit |
|
|
279 |
|
|
|
447 |
% |
|
|
51 |
|
|
|
(82 |
)% |
|
|
285 |
|
Operating margin |
|
|
12.6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
11.3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition integration charges |
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Before acquisition integration charges |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating profit |
|
$ |
280 |
|
|
|
419 |
% |
|
$ |
54 |
|
|
|
(81 |
)% |
|
$ |
291 |
|
Operating margin |
|
|
12.7 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
11.5 |
% |
Net sales in 2010 increased 31% compared to 2009 due to higher core sales of 30% and an
increase of 1% from the favorable impact of foreign exchange. The increase in core sales was driven
by global hydraulics markets, which rebounded from the depressed market conditions of 2009. Net
sales declined 33% in 2009 compared to 2008 due to a 32% decline in core sales and a 2% decline
from foreign exchange, partially offset by a 1% increase from the acquisition of certain
businesses. The decline in core sales resulted from market weakness in all regions beginning in
late 2008 and continuing throughout 2009 due to the global economic recession, with the United
States seeing the largest decline.
Operating profit before acquisition integration charges in 2010 increased 419% from 2009
primarily due to the increase in sales in 2010, net savings resulting from the workforce reductions
taken in 2009, and manufacturing efficiencies resulting from higher sales volumes. These increases
were partially offset by the cessation of temporary cost-savings measures introduced in 2009,
higher raw material costs, and increased support costs as operations returned to normal operating
levels compared to the depressed levels in 2009. Operating profit before acquisition integration
charges in 2009 decreased 81% from 2008 primarily due to the decline in sales discussed above and
difficulty in absorbing fixed manufacturing costs as a result of reduced sales in 2009. This
reduction was offset by net savings resulting from the workforce reductions and other
cost-containment actions.
Page 56
Aerospace
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change |
|
|
|
|
|
Change |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
from |
|
|
|
|
|
from |
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
2008 |
Net sales |
|
$ |
1,536 |
|
|
|
(4 |
)% |
|
$ |
1,602 |
|
|
|
(12 |
)% |
|
$ |
1,811 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating profit |
|
|
220 |
|
|
|
(10 |
)% |
|
|
245 |
|
|
|
(13 |
)% |
|
|
283 |
|
Operating margin |
|
|
14.3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
15.3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
15.6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition integration charges |
|
$ |
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Before acquisition integration charges |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating profit |
|
$ |
224 |
|
|
|
(13 |
)% |
|
$ |
257 |
|
|
|
(15 |
)% |
|
$ |
303 |
|
Operating margin |
|
|
14.6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
16.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
16.7 |
% |
Net sales in 2010 declined 4% compared to 2009, driven primarily by slow conditions in the
commercial aftermarket, reduced production of commercial transports in the U.S., and a small
decline in defense aerospace markets. Net sales declined 12% in 2009 compared to 2008 due to a 9%
reduction from core sales and a 3% decline from foreign exchange. The decline in core sales was
driven by lower sales in civilian aerospace markets in 2009, partially offset by a slight
improvement in defense aerospace markets.
Operating profit before acquisition integration charges in 2010 decreased 13% from 2009
primarily due to the decline in sales in 2010. The decline also reflected the cessation of
temporary cost-savings measures introduced in 2009 and increased support costs. The decline in
operating profit before acquisition integration charges of 15% in 2009 compared to 2008 was
primarily due to the decline in sales discussed above, partially offset by net savings resulting
from the workforce reductions and other cost-containment actions.
Truck
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change |
|
|
|
|
|
Change |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
from |
|
|
|
|
|
from |
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
2008 |
Net sales |
|
$ |
1,997 |
|
|
|
37 |
% |
|
$ |
1,457 |
|
|
|
(35 |
)% |
|
$ |
2,251 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating profit |
|
|
245 |
|
|
|
528 |
% |
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
(88 |
)% |
|
|
315 |
|
Operating margin |
|
|
12.3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.7 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
14.0 |
% |
Net sales increased 37% in 2010 from 2009 due to an increase in core sales of 32% and an
increase of 5% from the favorable impact of foreign exchange. The increase in core sales reflects
the sharp rebound in global end markets, led by a recovery in NAFTA heavy-duty truck markets and
strong markets in Brazil truck and agriculture vehicle production. Net sales declined 35% in 2009
compared to 2008 due to lower core sales of 30% and a 5% negative impact of foreign exchange. The
decline in core sales resulted from truck markets being down in all regions in 2009 due to the
global economic recession, with the NAFTA Class 8 market at levels not seen since 1991.
Operating profit in 2010 increased 528% from 2009 primarily due to the increase in sales in
2010, net savings resulting from the workforce reductions taken in 2009, and manufacturing
efficiencies resulting from higher sales volumes. These increases were partially offset by the
cessation of temporary cost-savings measures introduced in 2009, higher raw material costs, and
increased support costs as operations returned to normal operating levels compared to the depressed
levels in 2009. Operating profit in 2009 decreased 88% from 2008 primarily due to the significant
decline in sales in 2009 discussed above and difficulty in absorbing fixed manufacturing costs as a
result of reduced sales in 2009. This reduction was offset by net savings resulting from workforce
reductions and other cost-containment actions.
Page 57
Automotive
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change |
|
|
|
|
|
Change |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
from |
|
|
|
|
|
from |
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
2008 |
Net sales |
|
$ |
1,547 |
|
|
|
26 |
% |
|
$ |
1,229 |
|
|
|
(34 |
)% |
|
$ |
1,871 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating profit (loss) |
|
|
163 |
|
|
NM |
|
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
NM |
|
|
|
59 |
|
Operating margin |
|
|
10.5 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
NM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.2 |
% |
Net sales increased 26% in 2010 from 2009 due to higher core sales. The increase reflects a
rebound in global automotive markets, with growth in United States markets exceeding growth in
non-United States markets. Net sales declined 34% in 2009 compared to 2008 due to lower core sales
of 28% and a decline of 6% from foreign exchange. The decline in core sales was primarily
attributable to a contraction in global automotive end markets that began in 2008 and worsened in
2009 due to the global economic recession. The automotive market in the United States in 2009 was
markedly impacted in the second quarter by the shutdowns at General Motors and Chrysler.
Operating profit in 2010 increased from 2009 primarily due to the increase in sales in 2010,
net savings resulting from workforce reductions taken in 2009, and manufacturing efficiencies
resulting from higher sales volumes. These increases were partially offset by the cessation of
temporary cost-savings measures introduced in 2009 and increased support costs as operations
returned to normal operating levels compared to the depressed levels in 2009. Operating losses in
2009 were primarily due to the significant decline in sales discussed above, difficulty in
absorbing fixed manufacturing costs resulting from reduced sales in
2009, offset by an action taken in
2008 to close the Massa, Italy, valve actuation plant, which resulted in a charge of $27 during
that year. These items were partially offset by net savings resulting from workforce reductions and
other cost-containment actions.
2011 FORWARD-LOOKING PERSPECTIVE
As of late February, Eaton estimates its end markets for all of 2011 will grow 9%, with
markets in all six segments registering growth, the first year since 2006 in which the markets for
all of its segments have grown. The Company expects to outgrow its end markets in 2011 by
approximately $450 in net sales. The incremental revenues in 2011 from recent acquisitions of
businesses are expected to total $160. In total, Eaton anticipates its revenues in 2011 will grow
by 13% compared to 2010.
|
|
End markets for the Electrical Americas segment are expected to grow 6% in 2011. |
|
|
|
End markets for the Electrical Rest of World segment are expected to grow 7% in 2011, with
Asian growth outpacing growth in Europe. |
|
|
|
Global hydraulics markets are anticipated to grow 16% in 2011, with United States markets
up 19% and non-United States markets up 14%. |
|
|
|
End markets for the Aerospace segment are expected to grow by 4% in 2011, with growth in
United States markets of 4% and growth in non-United States markets
of 3%. |
|
|
|
End markets for the Truck segment are expected to grow 20% in 2011, with United States
markets up 40% and non-United States markets up 7%. |
|
|
|
End markets for the Automotive segment are expected to grow 6% in 2011, with United States
Automotive production up 7% and non-United States production up 5%. |
LIQUIDITY, CAPITAL RESOURCES AND CHANGES IN FINANCIAL CONDITION
Financial Condition and Liquidity
Eatons objective is to finance its business through operating cash flow and an appropriate
mix of equity and long-term and short-term debt. By diversifying its debt maturity structure, Eaton
reduces liquidity risk. The Company maintains access to the commercial paper markets through $1.5
billion of existing credit facilities, of which $500 expires each year from 2011 through 2013.
These facilities support Eatons commercial paper borrowings. There were no borrowings outstanding
under these revolving credit facilities at December 31, 2010. Eatons non-United States operations
also had available short-term lines of credit of approximately $975 at December 31, 2010. Over the
course of a year, cash, short-term investments and short-term debt may fluctuate in order to manage
global liquidity. Eaton believes it has the operating
Page 58
flexibility, cash flow, cash and short-term investment balances, and access to capital markets in
excess of the liquidity necessary to meet future operating needs of the business.
Eatons credit facilities and indentures governing certain long-term debt contain various
covenants, the violation of which would limit or preclude the use of the credit facilities for
future borrowings, or might accelerate the maturity of the related outstanding borrowings covered
by the indentures. At Eatons present credit rating level, the most restrictive financial covenant
provides that the ratio of secured debt (or lease payments due under a sale and leaseback
transaction) to adjusted consolidated net worth (or consolidated net tangible assets, in each case
as defined in the relevant credit agreement or indenture) may not exceed 10%. In each case the
ratio was substantially below the required threshold. In addition, Eaton is in compliance with each
of its debt covenants as of December 31, 2010 and for all periods presented.
Sources and Uses of Cash Flow
Operating Cash Flow
Net cash provided by operating activities was $1,282 in 2010, a decrease of $126 compared to
$1,408 in 2009. Operating cash flows in 2010 reflected higher net income of $937 compared to $385
in 2009. Higher net income in 2010 primarily resulted from increased sales due to the global
economic recovery during the year and the positive effect of recent changes in the Companys cost
structure. Cash provided by operating activities in 2010 was lowered by increased contributions to
pension plans of $403 compared to $271 in 2009. Net working capital funding was neutral in 2010
compared to a source of funds of $745 in 2009.
Net cash provided by operating activities was $1,408 in 2009, a slight decrease compared to
$1,441 in 2008. Operating cash flows in 2009 reflected lower net income of $385 compared to $1,070
in 2008 due to the impact of the global economic recession and the effect of cost containment
actions to improve the Companys cost structure. The reduction in operating cash flows in 2009 due
to lower net income was more than offset by lower net working capital requirements in 2009 compared
to 2008. The reduction in net working capital requirements in 2009, primarily accounts receivable
and inventory, was a source of cash in the amount of $745 and resulted from lower operating levels
as a result the global economic recession and internal efforts to reduce the investment in working
capital when compared to 2008.
Investing Cash Flow
Net cash used in investing activities was $1,012 in 2010, an increase of $787 compared to $225
in 2009. Investing cash flows in 2010 included $394 in capital expenditures for property, plant and
equipment, an increase of $199 from the depressed level of spending of $195 in 2009. Eaton expects
$550 in capital expenditures in 2011. Investing cash flows include $222 related to the acquisitions
of businesses primarily including CopperLogic, Wright Line Holding, Inc., and EMC Engineers.
Acquisition expenditures in 2009 were $10.
Net cash used in investing activities was $225 in 2009, a decrease of $2,965 compared to net
cash used in investing activities of $3,190 in 2008. Investing cash flows in 2009 included $195 in
capital expenditures for property, plant and equipment, a decrease of $253 from 2008 expenditures
of $448. This decrease is primarily related to efforts to conserve cash during 2009. Cash paid for
acquisitions decreased to $10 in 2009 from 2008 acquisition expenditures of $2,807 which were
primarily related to the acquisitions of The Moeller Group and Phoenixtec electrical businesses.
For additional information on business acquisitions see Note 2 to the Consolidated Financial
Statements.
Financing Cash Flow
Net cash used in financing activities was $261 in 2010, a decrease of $800 compared to $1,061
in 2009. The decrease was primarily due to the use of cash in 2009 to markedly reduce long-term
debt, with over $887 of debt paid off during the year.
Net cash used in financing activities was $1,061 in 2009, compared to a source of cash of
$1,815 in 2008. The decrease in 2009 was primarily due to proceeds of $1,522 from the sale of
common shares in 2008. During 2008, Eaton sold 37.4 million shares in a public offering in order to
refinance debt associated with the acquisitions of The Moeller Group and Phoenixtec. The decrease
was also due to a net reduction of long-term debt of $753 in 2009 compared to a net increase of
$667 in 2008.
Net-Debt-to-Capital Ratio
The net-debt-to-capital ratio was 23.7% at December 31, 2010 compared to 28.4% at December 31,
2009. The improvement reflected the combined effect during 2010 of the $9 decrease in total debt,
the $398 increase in cash and short-term investments, and the $585 increase in Eaton shareholders
equity.
Page 59
Credit Ratings
A summary of Eatons credit rating follow:
|
|
|
|
|
Credit Rating Agency |
|
Rating |
|
Outlook |
Standard & Poors (long- /short-term rating) |
|
A-/A-2 |
|
Stable outlook |
Moodys |
|
A3/P-2 |
|
Stable outlook |
Fitch |
|
A-/F2 |
|
Stable outlook |
Defined Benefit Plans
During 2010, the fair value of plan assets in the Companys employee pension plans increased
$467 to $2,509 at December 31, 2010. The increase in plan assets was primarily due to contributions
and actual returns on assets in excess of benefit payments and plan related expenses. At December
31, 2010, the net unfunded position of $1,409 in pension liabilities consisted of $778 in the U.S.
Pension Plan, $93 in all other plans that require minimum funding, ($52) in plans that are
overfunded, and $590 in plans that have no minimum funding requirements.
Funding requirements are a major consideration in making contributions to Eatons pension
plans. With respect to the Companys pension plans worldwide, it intends to contribute annually not
less than the minimum required by applicable law and regulations. In 2010, $403 was contributed to
the pension plans. The Company contributed $250 to the U.S. Pension Plan in early 2011 and
anticipates making an additional $103 of contributions to certain pension plans during 2011. The
funded status of the Companys pension plans at the end of 2011, and future contributions, will
depend primarily on the actual return on assets during the year and the discount rate used to
calculate certain benefits at the end of the year. Depending on these factors, and the resulting
funded status of the pension plans, the level of future contributions could be materially higher or
lower than in 2010.
In 2009, due to limitations imposed by the Pension Protection Act on pension lump-sum
distributions, Eatons United States Qualified Pension Plan (the Plan) became restricted from
making 100% lump-sum payments. As a result, the Plan experienced a significant increase in lump-sum
payments in 2009 prior to the limitation going into effect. Pension settlement expense was $86 for
2009, of which $83 was attributable to the U.S. pension plans. A portion of the increase in
lump-sum payments was attributable to the workforce reduction in 2009. Additionally, as a result of
the workforce reduction in 2009, Eaton incurred curtailment expense related to pension plans. The
curtailment expense included recognition of the change in the projected benefit obligation, as well
as recognition of a portion of the unrecognized prior service cost. Curtailment expense was $22 for
2009. These charges were primarily included in Cost of products sold or Selling and administrative
expense, as appropriate.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
Eaton does not have off-balance sheet arrangements or financings with unconsolidated entities
or other persons. In the ordinary course of business, the Company leases certain real properties
and equipment, as described in Note 7 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting
principles (GAAP) in the United States requires management to make certain estimates and
assumptions that may involve the exercise of significant judgment. For any estimate or assumption
used, there may be other reasonable estimates or assumptions that may have been used. However,
based on facts and circumstances inherent in developing estimates and assumptions, management
believes it is unlikely that applying other such estimates and assumptions would have caused
materially different amounts to have been reported. Actual results may differ from these estimates.
Revenue Recognition
Sales of products are recognized when a sales agreement is in place, products have been
shipped to unaffiliated customers and title has transferred in accordance with shipping terms (FOB
shipping point, FOB destination or equivalent International Commercial (INCO) Terms), the selling
price is fixed and determinable and collectability is reasonably assured, all significant related
acts of performance have been completed, and no other significant uncertainties exist. Shipping and
handling costs billed to customers are included in Net sales and the related costs in Cost of
products sold. Although the majority of the sales agreements contain standard terms and conditions,
there are also agreements that contain multiple elements or non-standard terms and conditions. As a
result, judgment is required to determine the appropriate accounting, including whether the
deliverables specified in these agreements should be treated as separate units of accounting for
sales recognition purposes, and, if so, how the sales price should be allocated among the elements
and when to recognize sales for each element. For delivered elements, sales are recognized only
when the delivered elements have standalone value, fair values of undelivered elements are known,
there are no uncertainties regarding
Page 60
customer acceptance and there are no customer-negotiated refund or return rights affecting the
sales recognized for delivered elements. Sales for service contracts are generally recognized as
the services are provided.
Impairment of Goodwill and Other Long-Lived Assets
Goodwill and indefinite life intangible assets are tested annually for impairment as of July 1
using a discounted cash flow model and other valuation techniques. Goodwill is tested for
impairment at the reporting unit level, which is equivalent to Eatons operating segments, and
based on the net assets for each segment, including goodwill and intangible assets. Goodwill is
assigned to each operating segment as this represents the lowest level that constitutes a business
for which discrete financial information is available and at the level in which management
regularly reviews the operating results. A discounted cash flow model is used to estimate the fair
value of each operating segment, which considers forecasted cash flows discounted at an estimated
weighted-average cost of capital. The Company selected the discounted cash flow methodology as it
believes that it is comparable to what would be used by other market participants. The forecasted
cash flows are based on the Companys long-term operating plan, and a terminal value is used to
estimate the operating segments cash flows beyond the period covered by the operating plan. The
weighted-average cost of capital is an estimate of the overall after-tax rate of return required by
equity and debt market participants of a business enterprise. These analyses require the exercise
of significant judgments, including judgments about appropriate discount rates, perpetual growth
rates and the timing of expected future cash flows. Discount rate assumptions are based on an
assessment of the risk inherent in the future cash flows of the respective operating segment.
Sensitivity analyses were performed around these assumptions in order to assess the reasonableness
of the assumptions and the resulting estimated fair values.
Indefinite life intangible assets primarily consist of trademarks. The fair value of these
assets are determined using a royalty relief methodology similar to that employed when the
associated assets were acquired, but using updated estimates of future sales, cash flows and
profitability.
For 2010, the fair value of Eatons reporting units and indefinite life intangible assets
substantially exceeded the respective carrying values. For additional information about goodwill
and other intangible assets, see Note 4 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Long-lived assets, goodwill and indefinite life intangible assets are reviewed for impairment
whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying amount may not be recoverable.
Events or circumstances that may result in an impairment review include operations reporting
losses, a significant adverse change in the use of an asset, the planned disposal or sale of the
asset, a significant adverse change in the business climate or legal factors related to the asset,
or a significant decrease in the estimated fair value of an asset. Upon indications of impairment,
assets and liabilities are grouped at the lowest level for which identifiable cash flows are
largely independent of the cash flows of other assets and liabilities. The asset group would be
considered impaired when the estimated future net undiscounted cash flows generated by the asset
group are less than its carrying value. In instances where the carrying amount of the asset group
exceeded the undiscounted cash flows, the fair value of the asset group would be determined and an
impairment loss would be recognized based on the amount by which the carrying value of the asset
group exceeds its fair value. Determining asset groups and underlying cash flows requires the use
of significant judgment.
Recoverability of Deferred Income Tax Assets
Eaton is subject to the income tax laws in the jurisdictions in which it operates. In order to
determine the income tax provision for financial statement purposes, Eaton must make significant
estimates and judgments about its business operations in these jurisdictions. These estimates and
judgments are also used in determining deferred income tax assets and liabilities that have been
recognized for differences between financial accounting and the income tax basis of assets and
liabilities, and income tax loss carryforwards and tax credit carryforwards.
Management evaluates the realizability of deferred income tax assets for each jurisdiction in
which it operates. If the Company experiences cumulative pretax income in a particular jurisdiction
in a three-year period including the current and prior two years, management normally concludes
that the deferred income tax assets will more likely than not be realizable and no valuation
allowance is recognized, unless known or planned operating developments would lead management to
conclude otherwise. However, if the Company experiences cumulative pretax losses in a particular
jurisdiction in a three-year period including the current and prior two years, management then
considers a series of factors in the determination of whether the deferred income tax assets can be
realized. These factors include historical operating results, known or planned operating
developments, the period of time over which certain temporary differences will reverse,
consideration of the utilization of certain deferred income tax liabilities, tax law carryback
capability in a particular country, prudent and feasible tax planning actions, and estimates of
future earnings and taxable income using the same assumptions as the Companys goodwill and other
impairment testing. After evaluation of these factors, if the deferred income tax assets are
expected to be realized within the tax carryforward period allowed for a specific country,
management would conclude that no valuation allowance would be required. To the extent that the
deferred income tax assets exceed the amount that is expected to be realized within the tax
carryforward period for a particular jurisdiction, management would conclude that a
Page 61
valuation allowance is required. For additional information about income taxes, see Note 8 to the
Consolidated Financial Statements.
Pension and Other Postretirement Benefit Plans
The measurement of liabilities related to pension plans and other postretirement benefits
plans is based on assumptions related to future events including interest rates, return on pension
plan assets, rate of compensation increases, and health care cost trend rates. Actual pension plan
asset performance will either reduce or increase pension losses included in accumulated other
comprehensive loss, which ultimately affects net income.
The discount rate for United States plans was determined by constructing a zero-coupon spot
yield curve derived from a universe of high-quality bonds as of the measurement date, which was
designed to match the discounted expected benefit payments. Only bonds rated Aa3 or better by
Moodys Investor Services were included. Callable bonds with explicit call schedules were excluded
but bonds with make-whole call provisions were included. Finally, a subset of bonds was selected
by grouping the universe of bonds by duration and retaining 50% of the bonds that had the highest
yields.
The discount rates for non-United States plans are appropriate for each region and are based
on high quality long-term corporate and government bonds. Consideration has been given to the
duration of the liabilities in each plan for selecting the bonds to be used in determining the
discount rate.
Key assumptions used to calculate pension and other postretirement benefits expense are
adjusted at each year-end. A 1-percentage point change in the assumed rate of return on pension
plan assets is estimated to have approximately a $30 effect on pension expense. Likewise, a
1-percentage point change in the discount rate is estimated to have approximately a $48 effect on
pension expense. A 1-percentage point change in the discount rate is estimated to have
approximately a $3 effect on expense for other postretirement benefits plans. Additional
information related to changes in key assumptions used to recognize expense for other
postretirement benefits plans is found in Note 6 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Environmental Contingencies
As a result of past operations, Eaton is involved in remedial response and voluntary
environmental remediation at a number of sites, including certain of its currently-owned or
formerly-owned plants. The Company has also been named a potentially responsible party under the
federal Superfund law at a number of disposal sites.
A number of factors affect the cost of environmental remediation, including the number of
parties involved at a particular site, the determination of the extent of contamination, the length
of time the remediation may require, the complexity of environmental regulations, and the
continuing advancement of remediation technology. Taking these factors into account, Eaton has
estimated the costs of remediation, which will be incurred over a period of years. The Company
accrues an amount on an undiscounted basis, consistent with the estimates of these costs, when it
is probable that a liability has been incurred. At December 31, 2010 and 2009, $71 and $80 was
accrued for these costs.
MARKET RISK DISCLOSURE
On a regular basis, Eaton monitors third-party depository institutions that hold its cash and
short-term investments, primarily for safety of principal and secondarily for maximizing yield on
those funds. The Company diversifies its cash and short-term investments among counterparties to
minimize exposure to any one of these entities. Eaton also monitors the creditworthiness of its
customers and suppliers to mitigate any adverse impact.
Eaton uses derivative instruments to manage exposure to volatility in raw material costs,
foreign currency and interest rates on certain debt instruments. Derivative financial instruments
used by the Company are straightforward and non-leveraged; the counterparties to these instruments
are financial institutions with strong credit ratings. Eaton maintains controls over the size of
positions entered into with any one counterparty and regularly monitors the credit rating of these
institutions. See Note 12 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information about
hedges and derivative financial instruments.
Eatons ability to access the commercial paper market, and the related cost of these
borrowings, is based on the strength of its credit rating and overall market conditions. The
Company has not experienced any material limitations in its ability to access these sources of
liquidity. At December 31, 2010, Eaton had $1.5 billion of long-term revolving credit facilities
with banks in support of its commercial paper program. It has no direct borrowings outstanding
under these credit facilities. Eatons non-United States operations also had available short-term
lines of credit of approximately $975 at December 31, 2010.
Interest rate risk can be measured by calculating the short-term earnings impact
that would result from adverse changes in interest rates. This exposure results from short-term
debt, which includes commercial paper at a floating
Page 62
interest rate, long-term debt that has been swapped to floating rates, and money market investments
that have not been swapped to fixed rates. Based upon the balances of investments and floating rate
debt at year end 2010, a 100 basis point increase in short-term interest rates would have reduced
the Companys net, pretax interest expense by $2.5.
Eaton also measures interest rate risk by estimating the net amount by which the fair value of
the Companys financial liabilities would change as a result of movements in interest rates. Based
on Eatons best estimate for a hypothetical, 100 basis point decrease in interest rates at December
31, 2010, the market value of the Companys debt and interest rate swap portfolio, in aggregate,
would increase by $224.
Foreign currency risk is the risk of economic losses due to adverse changes in
foreign currency exchange rates. The Company mitigates foreign currency risk by funding some
investments in foreign markets through local currency financings. Such non-United States dollar
debt was $148 at December 31, 2010. To augment Eatons non-United States dollar debt portfolio, the
Company also enters into forward foreign exchange contracts and foreign currency swaps from time to
time to mitigate the risk of economic loss in its foreign investments. At December 31, 2010, the
aggregate balance of such contracts was $331. Eaton also monitors exposure to transactions
denominated in currencies other than the functional currency of each country in which the Company
operates, and regularly enters into forward contracts to mitigate that exposure. In the aggregate,
Eatons portfolio of forward contracts related to such transactions was not material to its
Consolidated Financial Statements.
CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS
A summary of contractual obligations as of December 31, 2010 follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2012 |
|
|
2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
to |
|
|
to |
|
|
After |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2013 |
|
|
2015 |
|
|
2015 |
|
|
Total |
|
Long-term debt |
|
$ |
4 |
|
|
$ |
627 |
|
|
$ |
366 |
|
|
$ |
2,207 |
|
|
$ |
3,204 |
|
Interest expense related to
long-term debt |
|
|
191 |
|
|
|
347 |
|
|
|
285 |
|
|
|
1,109 |
|
|
|
1,932 |
|
Reduction of interest expense
from interest rate swap
agreements related to
long-term debt |
|
|
(34 |
) |
|
|
(47 |
) |
|
|
(27 |
) |
|
|
(70 |
) |
|
|
(178 |
) |
Operating leases |
|
|
145 |
|
|
|
184 |
|
|
|
88 |
|
|
|
59 |
|
|
|
476 |
|
Purchase obligations |
|
|
537 |
|
|
|
128 |
|
|
|
78 |
|
|
|
42 |
|
|
|
785 |
|
Other long-term obligations |
|
|
361 |
|
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
451 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
1,204 |
|
|
$ |
1,269 |
|
|
$ |
820 |
|
|
$ |
3,377 |
|
|
$ |
6,670 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense related to long-term debt is based on the fixed interest rate, or other
applicable interest rate related to the debt instrument. The reduction of interest expense due to
interest rate swap agreements related to long-term debt is based on the difference in the fixed
interest rate the Company receives from the swap, compared to the floating interest rate the
Company pays on the swap. Purchase obligations are entered into with various vendors in the normal
course of business. These amounts include commitments for purchases of raw materials, outstanding
non-cancelable purchase orders, releases under blanket purchase orders and commitments under
ongoing service arrangements. Other long-term obligations include anticipated contributions of $353
to pension plans in 2011 and $90 of deferred compensation earned under various plans for which the
participants have elected to receive disbursement at a later date.
The table above does not include future expected pension benefit payments or expected other
postretirement benefit payments. Information related to the amounts of these future payments is
described in Note 6 to the Consolidated Financial Statements. The table above also excludes the
liability for unrecognized income tax benefits, since the Company cannot predict with reasonable
certainty the timing of cash settlements with the respective taxing authorities. At December 31,
2010, the gross liability for unrecognized income tax benefits totaled $260, which includes
interest and penalties of $36.
OTHER MATTERS
In December 2010, a Brazilian court held that a judgment against a Brazilian company sold by
Eaton in 2006 could be enforced against Eaton. The Company recognized a pretax provision of 60
Brazilian Reais ($36 based on current exchange rates) related to this legal matter as a corporate
charge classified in Other (income) expense-net. Eaton is appealing this decision in the Brazilian
court system.
Page 63
On October 5, 2006, ZF Meritor LLC and Meritor Transmission Corporation (collectively,
Meritor) filed an action against Eaton in the United States District Court for Delaware. The action
sought damages, which would be trebled under United States antitrust laws, as well as injunctive
relief and costs. The suit alleged that Eaton engaged in anti-competitive conduct against Meritor
in the sale of heavy-duty truck transmissions in North America. Following a four week trial on
liability only, on October 8, 2009, the jury returned a verdict in favor of Meritor. Eaton firmly
believes that it competes fairly and honestly for business in the marketplace, and that at no time
did it act in an anti-competitive manner. During an earlier stage in the case, the judge concluded
that damage estimates contained in a report filed by Meritor were not based on reliable data and
the report was specifically excluded from the case. On November 3, 2009, Eaton filed a motion for
judgment as a matter of law and to set aside the verdict. That motion is currently pending.
Accordingly, an estimate of any potential loss related to this action cannot be made at this time.
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This Annual Report to Shareholders contains forward-looking statements concerning Eatons full
year 2011 sales, the performance in 2011 of its worldwide end markets, and Eatons 2011 growth in
relation to end markets. These statements should be used with caution and are subject to various
risks and uncertainties, many of which are outside the Companys control. The following factors
could cause actual results to differ materially from those in the forward-looking statements:
unanticipated changes in the markets for the Companys business segments; unanticipated downturns
in business relationships with customers or their purchases from the Company; competitive pressures
on sales and pricing; increases in the cost of material and other production costs, or unexpected
costs that cannot be recouped in product pricing; the introduction of competing technologies;
unexpected technical or marketing difficulties; unexpected claims, charges, litigation or dispute
resolutions; the impact of acquisitions and divestitures; unanticipated difficulties integrating
acquisitions; new laws and governmental regulations; interest rate changes; changes in currency
exchange rates; stock market fluctuations; and unanticipated deterioration of economic and
financial conditions in the United States and around the world. Eaton does not assume any
obligation to update these forward-looking statements.
Page 64
QUARTERLY DATA (unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter ended in 2010 |
|
|
Quarter ended in 2009 |
|
(In millions except for per share data) |
|
Dec. 31 |
|
|
Sept. 30 |
|
|
June 30 |
|
|
Mar. 31 |
|
|
Dec. 31 |
|
|
Sept. 30 |
|
|
June 30 |
|
|
Mar. 31 |
|
Net sales |
|
$ |
3,663 |
|
|
$ |
3,571 |
|
|
$ |
3,378 |
|
|
$ |
3,103 |
|
|
$ |
3,131 |
|
|
$ |
3,028 |
|
|
$ |
2,901 |
|
|
$ |
2,813 |
|
Gross profit |
|
|
1,098 |
|
|
|
1,091 |
|
|
|
991 |
|
|
|
902 |
|
|
|
890 |
|
|
|
850 |
|
|
|
712 |
|
|
|
639 |
|
Percent of net sales |
|
|
30.0 |
% |
|
|
30.6 |
% |
|
|
29.3 |
% |
|
|
29.1 |
% |
|
|
28.4 |
% |
|
|
28.1 |
% |
|
|
24.5 |
% |
|
|
22.7 |
% |
Income (loss) before income taxes |
|
|
293 |
|
|
|
305 |
|
|
|
251 |
|
|
|
187 |
|
|
|
170 |
|
|
|
166 |
|
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
(63 |
) |
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
283 |
|
|
$ |
269 |
|
|
$ |
229 |
|
|
$ |
156 |
|
|
$ |
212 |
|
|
$ |
194 |
|
|
$ |
31 |
|
|
$ |
(52 |
) |
Less net (income) loss for noncontrolling interests |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) attributable to Eaton
common shareholders |
|
$ |
280 |
|
|
$ |
268 |
|
|
$ |
226 |
|
|
$ |
155 |
|
|
$ |
211 |
|
|
$ |
193 |
|
|
$ |
29 |
|
|
$ |
(50 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) per common share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
$ |
0.82 |
|
|
$ |
0.78 |
|
|
$ |
0.66 |
|
|
$ |
0.46 |
|
|
$ |
0.62 |
|
|
$ |
0.57 |
|
|
$ |
0.09 |
|
|
$ |
(0.15 |
) |
Basic |
|
$ |
0.83 |
|
|
$ |
0.80 |
|
|
$ |
0.67 |
|
|
$ |
0.46 |
|
|
$ |
0.63 |
|
|
$ |
0.58 |
|
|
$ |
0.09 |
|
|
$ |
(0.15 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash dividends paid per common share |
|
$ |
0.29 |
|
|
$ |
0.29 |
|
|
$ |
0.25 |
|
|
$ |
0.25 |
|
|
$ |
0.25 |
|
|
$ |
0.25 |
|
|
$ |
0.25 |
|
|
$ |
0.25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Market price per common share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
High |
|
$ |
51.35 |
|
|
$ |
42.17 |
|
|
$ |
40.89 |
|
|
$ |
38.47 |
|
|
$ |
33.53 |
|
|
$ |
30.33 |
|
|
$ |
24.88 |
|
|
$ |
26.67 |
|
Low |
|
|
40.49 |
|
|
|
31.48 |
|
|
|
32.66 |
|
|
|
30.42 |
|
|
|
26.98 |
|
|
|
20.14 |
|
|
|
18.02 |
|
|
|
15.01 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per common share for the four quarters in a year may not equal full year earnings per share. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Significant non-recurring adjustments included in income before income taxes are as follows: |
Acquisition integration charges |
|
$ |
(15 |
) |
|
$ |
(7 |
) |
|
$ |
(9 |
) |
|
$ |
(9 |
) |
|
$ |
(27 |
) |
|
$ |
(19 |
) |
|
$ |
(15 |
) |
|
$ |
(21 |
) |
Workforce reduction charges |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(26 |
) |
|
|
(22 |
) |
|
|
(69 |
) |
|
|
(65 |
) |
Net income per common share and cash dividends paid per common share have been restated to give effect to the two-for-one stock split.
See Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information.
Page 65
TEN-YEAR CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL SUMMARY (unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions except for per share data) |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2003 |
|
|
2002 |
|
|
2001 |
|
Continuing operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales |
|
$ |
13,715 |
|
|
$ |
11,873 |
|
|
$ |
15,376 |
|
|
$ |
13,033 |
|
|
$ |
12,232 |
|
|
$ |
10,874 |
|
|
$ |
9,547 |
|
|
$ |
7,796 |
|
|
$ |
6,983 |
|
|
$ |
7,092 |
|
Income before income taxes |
|
|
1,036 |
|
|
|
303 |
|
|
|
1,140 |
|
|
|
1,055 |
|
|
|
979 |
|
|
|
969 |
|
|
|
756 |
|
|
|
475 |
|
|
|
378 |
|
|
|
257 |
|
Income after income taxes |
|
$ |
937 |
|
|
$ |
385 |
|
|
$ |
1,067 |
|
|
$ |
973 |
|
|
$ |
907 |
|
|
$ |
788 |
|
|
$ |
633 |
|
|
$ |
368 |
|
|
$ |
272 |
|
|
$ |
158 |
|
Income from discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
53 |
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
937 |
|
|
|
385 |
|
|
|
1,070 |
|
|
|
1,008 |
|
|
|
960 |
|
|
|
810 |
|
|
|
655 |
|
|
|
398 |
|
|
|
295 |
|
|
|
177 |
|
Less net income for noncontrolling
interests |
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
(12 |
) |
|
|
(14 |
) |
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
(12 |
) |
|
|
(14 |
) |
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to
Eaton common shareholders |
|
$ |
929 |
|
|
$ |
383 |
|
|
$ |
1,058 |
|
|
$ |
994 |
|
|
$ |
950 |
|
|
$ |
805 |
|
|
$ |
648 |
|
|
$ |
386 |
|
|
$ |
281 |
|
|
$ |
169 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per common share diluted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing operations |
|
$ |
2.73 |
|
|
$ |
1.14 |
|
|
$ |
3.25 |
|
|
$ |
3.19 |
|
|
$ |
2.94 |
|
|
$ |
2.54 |
|
|
$ |
2.00 |
|
|
$ |
1.18 |
|
|
$ |
0.90 |
|
|
$ |
0.54 |
|
Discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.01 |
|
|
|
0.12 |
|
|
|
0.17 |
|
|
|
0.08 |
|
|
|
0.07 |
|
|
|
0.10 |
|
|
|
0.08 |
|
|
|
0.07 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
2.73 |
|
|
$ |
1.14 |
|
|
$ |
3.26 |
|
|
$ |
3.31 |
|
|
$ |
3.11 |
|
|
$ |
2.62 |
|
|
$ |
2.07 |
|
|
$ |
1.28 |
|
|
$ |
0.98 |
|
|
$ |
0.61 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per common share basic |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing operations |
|
$ |
2.76 |
|
|
$ |
1.16 |
|
|
$ |
3.29 |
|
|
$ |
3.26 |
|
|
$ |
2.99 |
|
|
$ |
2.61 |
|
|
$ |
2.05 |
|
|
$ |
1.20 |
|
|
$ |
0.91 |
|
|
$ |
0.54 |
|
Discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.01 |
|
|
|
0.12 |
|
|
|
0.17 |
|
|
|
0.07 |
|
|
|
0.07 |
|
|
|
0.11 |
|
|
|
0.09 |
|
|
|
0.07 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
2.76 |
|
|
$ |
1.16 |
|
|
$ |
3.30 |
|
|
$ |
3.38 |
|
|
$ |
3.16 |
|
|
$ |
2.68 |
|
|
$ |
2.12 |
|
|
$ |
1.31 |
|
|
$ |
1.00 |
|
|
$ |
0.61 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average number of common shares
outstanding |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
|
339.5 |
|
|
|
335.8 |
|
|
|
324.6 |
|
|
|
300.6 |
|
|
|
305.8 |
|
|
|
308.0 |
|
|
|
314.2 |
|
|
|
301.0 |
|
|
|
286.8 |
|
|
|
282.0 |
|
Basic |
|
|
335.5 |
|
|
|
332.7 |
|
|
|
320.4 |
|
|
|
294.6 |
|
|
|
300.4 |
|
|
|
300.4 |
|
|
|
306.2 |
|
|
|
295.8 |
|
|
|
282.4 |
|
|
|
277.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash dividends paid per common share |
|
$ |
1.08 |
|
|
$ |
1.00 |
|
|
$ |
1.00 |
|
|
$ |
0.86 |
|
|
$ |
0.74 |
|
|
$ |
0.62 |
|
|
$ |
0.54 |
|
|
$ |
0.46 |
|
|
$ |
0.44 |
|
|
$ |
0.44 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
17,252 |
|
|
$ |
16,282 |
|
|
$ |
16,655 |
|
|
$ |
13,430 |
|
|
$ |
11,417 |
|
|
$ |
10,218 |
|
|
$ |
9,075 |
|
|
$ |
8,223 |
|
|
$ |
7,138 |
|
|
$ |
7,646 |
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
3,382 |
|
|
|
3,349 |
|
|
|
3,190 |
|
|
|
2,432 |
|
|
|
1,774 |
|
|
|
1,830 |
|
|
|
1,734 |
|
|
|
1,651 |
|
|
|
1,887 |
|
|
|
2,252 |
|
Total debt |
|
|
3,458 |
|
|
|
3,467 |
|
|
|
4,271 |
|
|
|
3,417 |
|
|
|
2,586 |
|
|
|
2,464 |
|
|
|
1,773 |
|
|
|
1,953 |
|
|
|
2,088 |
|
|
|
2,440 |
|
Eaton shareholders equity |
|
|
7,362 |
|
|
|
6,777 |
|
|
|
6,317 |
|
|
|
5,172 |
|
|
|
4,106 |
|
|
|
3,778 |
|
|
|
3,606 |
|
|
|
3,117 |
|
|
|
2,302 |
|
|
|
2,475 |
|
Eaton shareholders equity per
common share |
|
$ |
21.66 |
|
|
$ |
20.39 |
|
|
$ |
19.14 |
|
|
$ |
17.71 |
|
|
$ |
14.04 |
|
|
$ |
12.72 |
|
|
$ |
11.76 |
|
|
$ |
10.19 |
|
|
$ |
8.15 |
|
|
$ |
8.90 |
|
Common shares outstanding |
|
|
339.9 |
|
|
|
332.3 |
|
|
|
330.0 |
|
|
|
292.0 |
|
|
|
292.6 |
|
|
|
297.0 |
|
|
|
306.6 |
|
|
|
306.0 |
|
|
|
282.4 |
|
|
|
278.0 |
|
|
Net income per common share, weighted-average number of common shares
outstanding and cash dividends paid per common share have been restated to give
effect
to the two-for-one stock split. See Note 1 to the
Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information.
Page 66
Eaton Corporation
2010 Annual Report on Form 10-K
Exhibit Index
3 (i) |
|
Amended Articles of Incorporation (amended and restated as of April 24,
2008) Incorporated by reference to the Form 10-Q Report for the three months
ended March 31, 2008 |
3 (ii) |
|
Amended Regulations (amended and restated as of February 24, 2010)
Incorporated by reference to the Form 8-K Report dated February 24, 2010 |
4 (a) |
|
Pursuant to Regulation S-K Item 601(b) (4), the Company agrees to
furnish to the SEC, upon request, a copy of the instruments defining the rights of
holders of its other long-term debt |
|
(a) |
|
Senior Executive Incentive Compensation Plan (effective January 1,
2008) Incorporated by reference to the definitive Proxy Statement
dated March 14, 2008 |
|
|
(b) |
|
Executive Incentive Compensation Plan (effective January 1, 2005)
Incorporated by reference to the Form 10-K Report for the year ended
December 31, 2005 |
|
|
(c) |
|
2005 Non-Employee Director Fee Deferral Plan (2008 restatement)
Incorporated by reference to the Form 10-K Report for the year ended
December 31, 2007 |
|
|
(d) |
|
Deferred Incentive Compensation Plan II (2008 restatement)
Incorporated by reference to the Form 10-K Report for the year ended
December 31, 2007 |
|
|
(e) |
|
Excess Benefits Plan II (2008 restatement) Incorporated by
reference to the Form 10-K Report for the year ended December 31,
2007 |
|
|
(f) |
|
Incentive Compensation Deferral Plan II (2008 restatement)
Incorporated by reference to the Form 10-K Report for the year ended
December 31, 2007 |
|
|
(g) |
|
Limited Eaton Service Supplemental Retirement Income Plan II (2008
restatement) Incorporated by reference to the Form 10-K Report for
the year ended December 31, 2007 |
|
|
(h) |
|
Supplemental Benefits Plan II (2008 restatement) Incorporated by
reference to the Form 10-K Report for the year ended December 31,
2007 |
|
|
(i) |
|
Form of Restricted Share Unit Agreement (2 year vesting)
Incorporated by reference to the Form 10-K Report for the year ended
December 31, 2007 |
|
|
(j) |
|
Form of Restricted Share Unit Agreement (4 year vesting)
Incorporated by reference to the Form 10-K Report for the year ended
December 31, 2007 |
|
|
(k) |
|
Form of Restricted Share Agreement (2 year vesting) Incorporated by
reference to the Form 10-K Report for the year ended December 31,
2007 |
|
|
(l) |
|
Form of Restricted Share Agreement (4 year vesting) Incorporated by
reference to the Form 10-K Report for the year ended December 31,
2007 |
|
|
(m) |
|
Form of Restricted Share Agreement (Non-Employee Directors)
Incorporated by reference to the Form 8-K Report filed February 1,
2010 |
|
|
(n) |
|
Form of Stock Option Agreement for Executives (2008) Incorporated
by reference to the Form 10-K Report for the year ended December 31,
2007 |
|
|
(o) |
|
Form of Stock Option Agreement for Executives Incorporated by
reference to the Form 10-K Report for the year ended December 31,
2006 |
|
|
(p) |
|
Form of Stock Option Agreement for Non-Employee Directors (2008)
Incorporated by reference to the Form 10-K Report for the year ended
December 31, 2007 |
Page 67
|
(q) |
|
2002 Stock Plan Incorporated by reference to the definitive Proxy
Statement dated March 15, 2002 |
|
|
(r) |
|
2004 Stock Plan Incorporated by reference to the definitive Proxy
Statement dated March 19, 2004 |
|
|
(s) |
|
2008 Stock Plan Incorporated by reference to the definitive Proxy
Statement dated March 14, 2008 |
|
|
(t) |
|
2009 Stock Plan Incorporated by reference to the definitive Proxy
Statement dated March 13, 2009 |
|
|
(u) |
|
Plan for the Deferred Payment of Directors Fees (originally adopted
in 1985 and amended effective September 24, 1996, January 28, 1998,
January 23, 2002, February 24, 2004, December 8, 2004 and, in certain
respects, January 1, 2005) Incorporated by reference to the Form
10-K Report for the year ended December 31, 2007 |
|
|
(v) |
|
1996 Non-Employee Director Fee Deferral Plan (amended and restated
effective January 1, 2005) Incorporated by reference to the Form
10-K Report for the year ended December 31, 2006 |
|
|
(w) |
|
Form of Change of Control Agreement entered into with officers of
Eaton Corporation Incorporated by reference to the Form 10-K Report
for the year ended December 31, 2008 |
|
|
(x) |
|
Form of Indemnification Agreement entered into with officers of Eaton
Corporation Incorporated by reference to the Form 10-K Report for
the year ended December 31, 2002 |
|
|
(y) |
|
Form of Indemnification Agreement entered into with directors of
Eaton Corporation Incorporated by reference to the Form 8-K Report
filed January 26, 2007 |
|
|
(z) |
|
Executive Strategic Incentive Plan (amended and restated January 1,
2008) Incorporated by reference to the definitive Proxy Statement
dated March 14, 2008 |
|
|
(aa) |
|
Executive Strategic Incentive Plan II (effective January 1, 2001)
Incorporated by reference to the Form 10-K Report for the year ended
December 31, 2002 |
|
|
(bb) |
|
Supplemental Executive Strategic Incentive Plan (effective as of June
25, 2008) Incorporated by reference to the Form 10-K Report for the
year ended December 31, 2008 |
|
|
(cc) |
|
Deferred Incentive Compensation Plan (amended and restated effective
November 1, 2007) Incorporated by reference to the Form 10-K Report
for the year ended December 31, 2009 |
|
|
(dd) |
|
1998 Stock Plan Incorporated by reference to the definitive Proxy
Statement dated March 13, 1998 |
|
|
(ee) |
|
Incentive Compensation Deferral Plan (amended and restated October 1,
1997) Incorporated by reference to the Form 10-K Report for the
year ended December 31, 2000 |
|
|
(ff) |
|
Trust Agreement Officers and Employees (dated December 6, 1996)
Incorporated by reference to the Form 10-K Report for the year ended
December 31, 2002 |
|
|
(gg) |
|
Trust Agreement Non-employee Directors (dated December 6, 1996)
Incorporated by reference to the Form 10-K Report for the year ended
December 31, 2002 |
|
|
(hh) |
|
Group Replacement Insurance Plan (GRIP) (effective June 1, 1992)
Incorporated by reference to the Form 10-K Report for the year ended
December 31, 1992 |
|
|
(ii) |
|
1991 Stock Option Plan Incorporated by reference to the Form 10-K
Report for the year ended December 31, 2002 |
|
|
(jj) |
|
Excess Benefits Plan (amended and restated effective January 1, 1989)
Incorporated by reference to the Form 10-K Report for the year ended
December 31, 2002 |
Page 68
|
(kk) |
|
Supplemental Benefits Plan (amended and restated January 1, 1989)
Incorporated by reference to the Form 10-K Report for the year ended
December 31, 2002 |
|
|
(ll) |
|
Eaton Corporation Board of Directors Policy on Incentive
Compensation, Stock Options and Other Equity Grants upon the
Restatement of Financial Results Incorporated by reference to the
Form 10-K Report for the year ended December 31, 2007 |
|
|
(mm) |
|
Amended and Restated Grantor Trust Agreement for Non-Employee
Directors Deferred Fees Plans effective January 1, 2010 Filed in
conjunction with this Form 10-K report.* |
|
|
(nn) |
|
Amended and Restated Grantor Trust Agreement for Employees Deferred
Compensation Plans effective January 1, 2010 Filed in
conjunction with this Form 10-K report.* |
12 |
|
Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges Filed in conjunction with this Form 10-K Report * |
|
14 |
|
Code of Ethics Incorporated by reference to the definitive Proxy Statement filed on March 14, 2008 |
|
21 |
|
Subsidiaries of Eaton Corporation Filed in conjunction with this Form 10-K Report * |
|
23 |
|
Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm Filed in conjunction
with this Form 10-K
Report * |
|
24 |
|
Power of Attorney Filed in conjunction with this Form 10-K Report * |
|
31.1 |
|
Certification of Form 10-K (Pursuant to the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, Section
302) Filed in conjunction with this Form 10-K Report * |
|
31.2 |
|
Certification of Form 10-K (Pursuant to the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, Section
302) Filed in conjunction with this Form 10-K Report * |
|
32.1 |
|
Certification of Form 10-K (Pursuant to the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, Section
906) Filed in conjunction with this Form 10-K Report * |
|
32.2 |
|
Certification of Form 10-K (Pursuant to the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, Section
906) Filed in conjunction with this Form 10-K Report * |
|
101.INS |
|
XBRL Instance Document * |
|
101.SCH |
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document * |
|
101.CAL |
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document * |
|
101.DEF |
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document * |
|
101.LAB |
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document * |
|
101.PRE |
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document * |
|
|
|
* |
|
Submitted electronically herewith. |
Attached as Exhibit 101 to this report are the following formatted in XBRL (Extensible
Business Reporting Language): (i) Consolidated Statements of Income for the years ended
December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008, (ii) Consolidated Balance Sheets at December 31, 2010 and
2009, (iii) Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2010,
2009 and 2008 (iv) Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for the year ended December
31, 2010.
In accordance with Rule 406T of Regulation S-T, the XBRL related information in Exhibit 101
to this Annual Report on Form 10-K shall not be deemed to be filed for purposes of Section
18 of the Exchange Act, or otherwise subject to the liability of that section, and shall not
be part of any registration statement or other document filed under the Securities Act or
the Exchange Act, except as shall be expressly set forth by specific reference in such
filing.
Page 69