Form 10-Q
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
|
|
|
þ |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2010
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission file number 0-17771
FRANKLIN CREDIT HOLDING CORPORATION
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
|
|
26-3104776
(IRS Employer
Identification No.) |
|
|
|
101 Hudson Street
Jersey City, New Jersey
(Address of Principal
Executive Offices)
|
|
07302
(Zip code) |
(201) 604-1800
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed
by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or
for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months
(or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes o
No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a
non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large accelerated
filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
(Check one)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer o
|
|
Accelerated filer o
|
|
Non-accelerated filer o
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
|
|
Smaller reporting company þ |
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
Yes o No þ |
Number of shares of the registrants common stock, par value $0.01 per share, outstanding as of May
12, 2010: 8,029,795
FRANKLIN CREDIT HOLDING CORPORATION
FORM 10-Q
INDEX
FRANKLIN CREDIT HOLDING CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2010 |
|
|
December 31, 2009 |
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
19,003,631 |
|
|
$ |
15,963,115 |
|
Restricted cash |
|
|
2,614,277 |
|
|
|
2,611,640 |
|
Investment in REIT securities |
|
|
477,316,409 |
|
|
|
477,316,409 |
|
Investment in trust certificates at fair value |
|
|
67,579,521 |
|
|
|
69,355,735 |
|
Mortgage loans and real estate held for sale |
|
|
336,595,033 |
|
|
|
345,441,865 |
|
Notes receivable held for sale, net |
|
|
3,345,140 |
|
|
|
3,575,323 |
|
Accrued interest receivable |
|
|
41,248 |
|
|
|
41,337 |
|
Deferred financing costs, net |
|
|
7,252,899 |
|
|
|
7,287,536 |
|
Other receivables |
|
|
3,198,213 |
|
|
|
3,233,676 |
|
Building, furniture and equipment, net |
|
|
1,389,583 |
|
|
|
1,529,418 |
|
Income tax receivable |
|
|
1,853,838 |
|
|
|
5,592,370 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
952,346 |
|
|
|
692,730 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
921,142,138 |
|
|
$ |
932,641,154 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS (DEFICIT) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes payable, net of debt discount of $190,621 at March 31, 2010
and $191,511 at December 31, 2009 |
|
$ |
1,369,112,044 |
|
|
$ |
1,367,199,323 |
|
Financing agreements |
|
|
1,000,000 |
|
|
|
1,000,000 |
|
Nonrecourse liability |
|
|
336,595,033 |
|
|
|
345,441,865 |
|
Accounts payable and accrued expenses |
|
|
4,114,364 |
|
|
|
4,466,779 |
|
Derivative liabilities, at fair value |
|
|
12,307,535 |
|
|
|
13,144,591 |
|
Terminated derivative liability |
|
|
8,200,000 |
|
|
|
8,200,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
1,731,328,976 |
|
|
|
1,739,452,558 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and Contingencies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders (Deficit): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, $0.001 par value; authorized 3,000,000;
issued and outstanding: none |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock and additional paid-in capital, $0.01 par value,
22,000,000 authorized shares; issued and outstanding: 8,029,795
at March 31, 2010 and 8,012,795 at December 31, 2009 |
|
|
22,082,933 |
|
|
|
22,067,763 |
|
Noncontrolling interest in subsidiary |
|
|
1,722,606 |
|
|
|
1,657,275 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive (loss) |
|
|
(9,047,735 |
) |
|
|
(12,310,764 |
) |
Retained (deficit) |
|
|
(824,944,642 |
) |
|
|
(818,225,678 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders (deficit) |
|
|
(810,186,838 |
) |
|
|
(806,811,404 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders (deficit) |
|
$ |
921,142,138 |
|
|
$ |
932,641,154 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
3
FRANKLIN CREDIT HOLDING CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2010 AND 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income |
|
$ |
11,475,228 |
|
|
$ |
16,454,325 |
|
Dividend income |
|
|
10,629,299 |
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase discount earned |
|
|
|
|
|
|
392,127 |
|
(Loss) on mortgage loans and real estate held for sale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(282,593,653 |
) |
(Loss) on valuation of investment in trust certificates
and notes receivable held for sale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(62,651,940 |
) |
Fair valuation adjustments |
|
|
(3,771,042 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Gain on sale of other real estate owned |
|
|
|
|
|
|
374,344 |
|
Servicing fees and other income |
|
|
1,178,557 |
|
|
|
2,509,557 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total (losses)/revenues |
|
|
19,512,042 |
|
|
|
(325,515,240 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense |
|
|
19,019,243 |
|
|
|
17,683,156 |
|
Collection, general and administrative |
|
|
6,867,983 |
|
|
|
18,692,995 |
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
169,479 |
|
Amortization of deferred financing costs |
|
|
34,637 |
|
|
|
166,768 |
|
Depreciation |
|
|
145,512 |
|
|
|
156,648 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total expenses |
|
|
26,067,375 |
|
|
|
36,869,046 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) before provision for income taxes |
|
|
(6,555,333 |
) |
|
|
(362,384,286 |
) |
Income tax |
|
|
98,300 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) |
|
|
(6,653,633 |
) |
|
|
(362,384,286 |
) |
Net income attributed to noncontrolling interest |
|
|
65,331 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) attributed to common stockholders |
|
$ |
(6,718,964 |
) |
|
$ |
(362,384,286 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) per common share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted |
|
$ |
(0.84 |
) |
|
$ |
(45.33 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of shares outstanding: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted |
|
|
8,020,256 |
|
|
|
7,994,045 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
4
FRANKLIN CREDIT HOLDING CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS (DEFICIT)
THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock and |
|
|
Noncontrolling |
|
|
Other |
|
|
Retained |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional Paid-in Capital |
|
|
Interest |
|
|
Comprehensive |
|
|
(Deficit)/ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
in Subsidiary |
|
|
Loss |
|
|
Earnings |
|
|
Total |
|
BALANCE, JANUARY 1, 2010 |
|
|
8,012,795 |
|
|
$ |
22,067,763 |
|
|
$ |
1,657,275 |
|
|
$ |
(12,310,764 |
) |
|
$ |
(818,225,678 |
) |
|
$ |
(806,811,404 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock-based compensation |
|
|
17,000 |
|
|
|
15,170 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,170 |
|
Net income attributed to minority interest |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
65,331 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
65,331 |
|
Amortization unrealized loss on derivatives |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,263,029 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,263,029 |
|
Net (loss) attributed to common shareholders |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,718,964 |
) |
|
|
(6,718,964 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BALANCE, MARCH 31, 2010 |
|
|
8,029,795 |
|
|
$ |
22,082,933 |
|
|
$ |
1,722,606 |
|
|
$ |
(9,047,735 |
) |
|
$ |
(824,944,642 |
) |
|
$ |
(810,186,838 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the quarter ended March 31, 2010, the total comprehensive loss amounted to $3.4
million, which was comprised of the net loss of $6.7 million and amortization of unrealized loss on
derivatives of $3.3 million. For the quarter ended March 31, 2009, the total comprehensive loss
amounted to $358.5 million, which was comprised of the net loss of $362.4 million and amortization
of unrealized loss on derivatives of $3.9 million.
See
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
5
FRANKLIN CREDIT HOLDING CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2010 AND 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) attributed to common shareholders |
|
$ |
(6,718,964 |
) |
|
$ |
(362,384,286 |
) |
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by/(used in) operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain on sale of other real estate owned |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(374,344 |
) |
Depreciation |
|
|
145,512 |
|
|
|
156,648 |
|
Amortization of deferred costs and fees on originated loans, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
48,215 |
|
Loss on mortgage loans and real estate held for sale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
282,593,653 |
|
Loss on value of investment in trust certificates and notes receivable held for sale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
62,651,940 |
|
Fair valuation adjustments |
|
|
3,771,042 |
|
|
|
|
|
Principal collections on mortgage loans and real estate held for sale, net |
|
|
5,627,977 |
|
|
|
|
|
Paid in kind interest |
|
|
8,434,273 |
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from the sale of real estate held for sale |
|
|
3,180,865 |
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of deferred financing costs |
|
|
34,637 |
|
|
|
166,768 |
|
Amortization of debt discount |
|
|
890 |
|
|
|
4,525 |
|
Stock-based compensation |
|
|
15,170 |
|
|
|
64,335 |
|
Purchase discount earned |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(392,127 |
) |
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
169,479 |
|
Net income attributed to noncontrolling interest |
|
|
65,331 |
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued interest receivable |
|
|
89 |
|
|
|
1,322,687 |
|
Other receivables |
|
|
35,463 |
|
|
|
1,992,609 |
|
Income tax receivable |
|
|
3,738,532 |
|
|
|
(132,949 |
) |
Other assets |
|
|
(259,614 |
) |
|
|
(7,408,974 |
) |
Accounts payable and accrued expenses |
|
|
2,073,558 |
|
|
|
3,798,281 |
|
Terminated derivative liability |
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,200,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by/(used in) operating activities |
|
|
20,144,761 |
|
|
|
(9,523,540 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Increase)/decrease in restricted cash |
|
|
(2,637 |
) |
|
|
6,640,552 |
|
Principal collections on notes receivable |
|
|
241,619 |
|
|
|
10,622,170 |
|
Principal collections on loans held for investment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,857,079 |
|
Proceeds from sale of other real estate owned |
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,227,015 |
|
Purchase of building, furniture and equipment |
|
|
(5,677 |
) |
|
|
(3,370 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by investing activities |
|
|
233,305 |
|
|
|
42,343,446 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal payments of notes payable |
|
|
(6,522,443 |
) |
|
|
(31,255,859 |
) |
Payments on nonrecourse liability |
|
|
(10,815,107 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from financing agreements |
|
|
|
|
|
|
975,667 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash (used in) financing activities |
|
|
(17,337,550 |
) |
|
|
(30,280,192 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET CHANGE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS |
|
|
3,040,516 |
|
|
|
2,539,714 |
|
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, BEGINNING OF PERIOD |
|
|
15,963,115 |
|
|
|
21,426,777 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, END OF PERIOD |
|
$ |
19,003,631 |
|
|
$ |
23,966,491 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash payments for interest |
|
$ |
7,892,289 |
|
|
$ |
11,954,108 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash payments for taxes |
|
$ |
173,525 |
|
|
$ |
201,408 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NON-CASH INVESTING AND FINANCING ACTIVITY: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transfer from notes receivable and loans held for investment to OREO |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
20,566,413 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
6
FRANKLIN
CREDIT HOLDING CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1. BUSINESS
As used herein, references to the Company, Franklin, we, our and us refer to
Franklin Credit Holding Corporation, collectively with its subsidiaries.
Overview
March 2009 Restructuring
Effective March 31, 2009, Franklin Credit Holding Corporation (Franklin Holding), and
certain of its consolidated subsidiaries, including Franklin Credit Management Corporation (FCMC)
and Tribeca Lending Corp. (Tribeca), entered into a series of agreements (collectively, the
Restructuring Agreements) with The Huntington National Bank (Huntington or the Bank) pursuant
to which (i) the Companys loans, pledges and guarantees with the Bank and its participating banks
were substantially restructured pursuant to a legacy credit agreement (the Legacy Credit
Agreement), (ii) substantially all of the Companys portfolio of subprime mortgage loans and owned
real estate, acquired through foreclosure, was transferred to a trust (the Trust; with the loans
and owned real estate transferred to the Trust collectively referred to herein as the Portfolio)
in exchange for trust certificates, with certain trust certificates, representing an undivided
interest in approximately 83% of the Portfolio, transferred in turn by the Company to Huntington
Capital Financing, LLC (the REIT), a real estate investment trust wholly-owned by the Bank, (iii)
FCMC and Franklin Holding entered into an amended $13.5 million credit facility with the Bank (the
Licensing Credit Agreement), and (iv) FCMC entered into a market-rate servicing agreement (the
Servicing Agreement) with the Bank (the Restructuring). See Note 7 Notes Payable and
Financing Agreements.
The Restructuring did not include a portion of the Companys debt (the Unrestructured Debt),
which as of March 31, 2010 totaled approximately $39.1 million. The Unrestructured Debt remains
subject to the original terms of the Franklin forbearance agreement entered into with the Bank in
December 2007 and subsequent amendments thereto (the Franklin Forbearance Agreement) and the
Franklin 2004 master credit agreement. Most recently on March 26, 2010, Franklin Holding and
certain of its subsidiaries, including FCMC and Franklin Credit Asset Corporation (Franklin
Asset), entered into an amendment of the Franklin Forbearance Agreement and Franklin 2004 master
credit agreement (the Amendment) whereby the Bank agreed to further extend the forbearance period
until June 30, 2010. While the Company has no reason to believe that the Bank will not continue to
grant such extensions until resolution of the Unrestructured Debt is reached, there is no assurance
that the Bank will continue to grant further extensions to the Franklin Forbearance Agreement
covering the Unrestructured Debt. See Note 7 Notes Payable and Financing Agreements
Forbearance Agreements with Lead Lending Bank.
From the perspective of the Company and its stockholders, the Restructuring provided for the
release of thirty percent of the equity in FCMC, ten percent of which has been transferred to the
Companys principal stockholder, Thomas J. Axon, from the Companys pledges to the Bank in respect
of its Legacy Credit Agreement. The Legacy Credit Agreement also provides for the possibility of
release of up to an additional fifty percent (which, as of March 31, 2010, is now forty-five
percent due to the failure to achieve the first collection target identified in the agreement, and
of which a maximum of an additional ten percent would go to Thomas J. Axon), based upon the Banks
receipt of the agreed amounts of net remittances from the Portfolio from March 31, 2009, the
effective date of the Legacy Credit
Agreement, through the term of the Legacy Credit Agreement pursuant to and in accordance with
the schedule of collection levels identified in the Legacy Credit Agreement. See Note 7 Notes
Payable and Financing Agreements Forbearance Agreements with Lead Lending Bank.
7
The loans transferred by the Company to the Trust continue to be included on the Companys
balance sheet, and the revenues from such loans are reflected in the Companys consolidated
results, in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of
America (GAAP), notwithstanding the fact that trust certificates representing an undivided
interest in approximately 83% of the Portfolio were transferred to Huntington in the Restructuring.
Accordingly, 100% of the loans continue to be shown on the Companys balance sheet and the
revenues, and related expenses, continue to be included in these consolidated results. As a
result, the fees received from Huntington subsequent to March 31, 2009 for servicing their loans,
and the third-party costs incurred by us and reimbursed by Huntington, in the servicing and
collection of their loans for purposes of these consolidated financial statements are not
recognized as servicing fees and reimbursement of third-party servicing costs, but as additional
interest and other income earned and additional, offsetting expenses as if the Company continued to
own the loans.
Amendment and Extension of Licensing Credit Agreement. On March 26, 2010, the Company entered
into an amendment to the Licensing Credit Agreement with the Bank, which renewed and extended the
Licensing Credit Agreement entered into with the Bank on March 31, 2009 as part of the March 31,
2009 restructuring. The amendment includes a reduction of the draw credit facility (Draw
Facility) from $5.0 million to $4.0 million and an extension of the termination date to May 31,
2010 for the Draw Facility and to March 31, 2011 for the $2.0 million revolving line of credit and
$6.5 million letter of credit facilities. The amendment further provides that FCMC shall, to the
extent permitted by applicable law, no less frequently than semi-annually, within forty-five days
after each June 30th and December 31st of each calendar year, make pro rata dividends,
distributions and payments to FCMCs shareholders and the Bank under the Legacy Credit Agreement;
provided, however, that no such dividend, distribution or payment shall be made if a default or
event of default shall exist as a result under the Licensing Credit Agreement. In accordance with
the Legacy Credit Agreement, the Bank is currently entitled to 70% of all amounts distributed by
FCMC. The payment of any dividend, distribution or payment to FCMCs shareholders and the Bank
would result in a reduction of FCMCs stockholders equity and cash available for its operations.
In addition, such distributions, if required by the Bank, could cause FCMC to fall below certain
state regulatory minimum net worth requirements for licensing purposes such as in New York State
(for example, the distribution of $2,245,000 made to the Bank at its request on September 30, 2009
has negatively affected the net worth of FCMC). See Licenses to Service Loans. All other
material terms and conditions of the Licensing Credit Agreement remain the same, and there were no
changes to the collateral, warranties, representations, covenants and events of defaults. See Note
7 Notes Payable and Financing Agreements Restructuring Agreements with Lead Lending Bank.
December 2008 Corporate Reorganization and Holding Company Structure
On December 19, 2008, the Company engaged in a series of transactions (the Reorganization)
in which the Company (i) adopted a holding company form of organizational structure, with Franklin
Holding serving as the new public-company parent, (ii) transferred all of the equity and membership
interests in FCMCs direct subsidiaries to other entities in the reorganized corporate structure of
the Company, (iii) assigned legal record ownership of any loans in the Companys portfolios held
directly by FCMC and Tribeca to other entities in the reorganized corporate structure of the
Company, and amended its loan agreements with the Bank.
8
Franklin Credit Holding Corporation is the successor issuer to Franklin Credit Management
Corporation, FCMC. In the Reorganization, FCMC became a subsidiary of Franklin Holding and ceased
to have any subsidiaries and, therefore, ceased to have portfolios of loans and real estate
properties and the related indebtedness to the Bank.
Going Concern Uncertainty Franklin Holding
The Company has been and continues to be operating in an extraordinary and difficult
environment, and has been significantly and negatively impacted by the unprecedented credit and
economic market turmoil of the past few years, including the more recent recessionary economy of
2009. Particularly impacting Franklin as of the March 2009 Restructuring was the severe
deterioration in the U.S. housing market and the nearly complete shutdown of the mortgage credit
market for borrowers without excellent credit histories, and the slowing economy with increasing
unemployment. These unprecedented market conditions adversely affected the Companys portfolio of
residential mortgage loans, particularly its second-lien mortgage loans, delinquencies, provisions
for loan losses, operating losses and cash flows, which resulted in significant stockholders
deficit of $810.2 million and $822.9 million at March 31, 2010 and March 31, 2009, respectively.
The Company has been, since the latter part of 2007, expressly prohibited by the Bank from
acquiring or originating loans. In addition, the Companys restructuring agreements with the Bank
contain affirmative covenants that the Companys servicing subsidiary, FCMC, be licensed, qualified
and in good standing, where required, and that it maintain its licenses to service mortgage loans
and real estate owned properties serviced under the servicing agreement entered into in connection
with the Restructuring. Any event of default under the March 31, 2009 Restructuring Agreements, or
failure to successfully renew these Restructuring Agreements or enter into new credit facilities
with Huntington prior to their scheduled maturity, could entitle Huntington to declare the
Companys indebtedness immediately due and payable and result in the transfer of the remaining
loans pledged to Huntington to a third party. Moreover, certain events of default under the
Restructuring Agreements, including defaults under provisions relating to enforceability,
bankruptcy, maintenance of collateral and lien positions, and certain negative covenants typical
for agreements of this nature, or defaults under its Servicing Agreement with the Bank or the
Licensing Credit Agreement could result in the transfer of the Companys sub-servicing contract as
servicer of what had been substantially all of its loans and owned real estate prior to the
Restructuring. Without the continued cooperation and assistance from Huntington, the consolidated
Franklin Holdings ability to continue as a viable business is in substantial doubt, and it may not
be able to continue as a going concern.
Operating Losses Franklin Holding
The Company had a net loss attributed to common stockholders of $6.7 million for the first
quarter of 2010, compared with a net loss of $362.4 million for the first quarter of 2009. The
Company had a loss per common share for the three months ended March 31, 2010 of $0.84 both on a
diluted and basic basis, compared to a loss per share of $45.33 on both a diluted and basic basis
for the three months ended March 31, 2009.
As part of the Restructuring with the Bank on March 31, 2009, the Company incurred a loss of
$282.6 million on the transfer of approximately 83% of the Portfolio (in the form of trust
certificates in the Trust) to the REIT of the Bank in exchange for preferred and common stock in
the REIT then approximately valued at $477.3 million. Because the transfer of the trust
certificates in the Trust to the REIT is treated as a financing and not a sale for accounting
purposes, the mortgage loans and real estate have remained on the Companys balance sheet
classified as mortgage loans and real estate held for sale securing a nonrecourse liability in an
equal amount. In addition, the Company recognized a loss of $62.7 million on the valuation of the
remaining investments on the Companys balance sheet, including
approximately 17% of the Portfolio transferred to the Trust, and the remaining loans securing
the Unrestructured Debt.
9
Licenses to Service Loans
By letter dated April 12, 2010, the New York State Banking Department (the Banking
Department) advised FCMC that in connection with its review of its financial statements and
mortgage servicing volume, its application for registration as a mortgage servicer in that state,
which FCMC had filed during the transitional period allowed by the state for registration of
mortgage servicers doing business in New York State on June 30, 2009, cannot be accepted for
processing until FCMC addresses its net worth, which as adjusted (Adjusted Net Worth) and
calculated by the Banking Department was determined to be below the minimum Adjusted Net Worth
requirement for mortgage servicers established under applicable regulations adopted through
emergency rule making.
The emergency regulations, which were adopted by the New York State Superintendent of Banks
and which implement the statutory registration requirement for mortgage servicers in New York State
that went into effect on July 1, 2009, require (i) an Adjusted Net Worth of at least 1% of the
outstanding principal balance of aggregate mortgage loans serviced (whether or not in New York),
but in any event not less than $250,000; and, (ii) a ratio of Adjusted Net Worth to the outstanding
principal balance of New York mortgage loans serviced of at least 5%. Although the latest version
of the emergency regulations are effective March 17, 2010 until June 12, 2010, the Banking
Department has indicated that it expects to propose permanent regulations in substantially similar
form as the emergency regulations for public comment in the near future.
Adjusted Net Worth, as defined under the Superintendents emergency regulations, consists of
total equity capital at the end of the reporting period as determined by GAAP less: goodwill,
intangible assets (excluding mortgage servicing rights), any assets pledged to secure obligations
of a person other than the applicant, any assets due from officers or stockholders of the applicant
or related companies; that portion of any marketable securities (listed or unlisted) not shown at
lower of cost or market; any amount in excess of the lower of cost or market value of mortgages in
foreclosure, construction loans or property acquired through foreclosure, and any amount shown on
the balance sheet as investments in unconsolidated joint ventures, subsidiaries, affiliates, and/or
other related companies that is greater than the value of such investments accounted for using the
equity method of accounting.
At March 31, 2010, FCMC serviced mortgage loans (as defined under the Superintendents
emergency regulations) throughout the United States with an outstanding principal balance of
approximately $1.61 billion, serviced New York mortgage loans with an outstanding principal balance
of approximately $158.2 million, and had an Adjusted Net Worth of approximately $8.0 million (with
net worth under GAAP of $19.9 million). Although the ratio of Adjusted Net Worth of FCMC to the
outstanding principal balance of New York mortgage loans is greater than the required 5%, the
Adjusted Net Worth of FCMC falls short of the 1% of the outstanding principal balance of aggregate
mortgage loans serviced in the United States by approximately $8.1 million. Accordingly, the
Banking Department has required that FCMC provide a written capital plan acceptable to the Banking
Department, which among other prerequisites would address how FCMC intends to achieve compliance,
on an ongoing basis with the regulatory net worth requirements, and commit FCMC to maintaining a
minimum Adjusted Net Worth of 0.25% of aggregate loans serviced in the United States (which is
lower than the requirement under the emergency regulations) and 5% of New York mortgage loans
serviced, whichever is higher while it seeks to restore such compliance.
10
On May 10, 2010, in an initial step towards increasing FCMCs Adjusted Net Worth, the Company
utilized funds recently received from a Federal income tax refund to reduce the net inter-
company receivable in the amount of $2.5 million due to FCMC by its affiliated companies.
This step increased Adjusted Net Worth to approximately $10.5 million, or approximately 0.65% of
the aggregate principal balance of loans serviced nationwide.
Additionally, FCMC expects to curtail the pro rata distributions or payments to the Bank and
dividends to its shareholders that are ordinarily required under the terms of the Licensing Credit
Agreement, as amended. Pursuant to such terms, the distributions are not required where they would
give rise to a default under the Licensing Credit Agreement, which would occur if FCMC is unable to
increase its Adjusted Net Worth, and as a result, fails to obtain or maintain a license as a
registered mortgage servicer in New York.
The capital plan as proposed by FCMC and submitted to the Banking Department on May 12, 2010
includes in relevant part a commitment, until FCMC is in full compliance with the net worth
requirements for mortgage servicers in New York State, to (i) meet regulatory net worth
requirements as soon as practicable but in no event later than December 31, 2012 through the
retention of net earnings and dividend restrictions, (ii) maintain an interim Adjusted Net Worth
until FCMC complies with regulatory net worth requirements of not less than approximately $7.9
million (Minimum Level), and not less than 5% of the principal balance of New York mortgage loans
serviced by FCMC and 0.25% of the aggregate mortgage loans serviced in the United States, (iii)
not, without the prior written consent of the Banking Department, service additional mortgage loans
secured by 1-4 family residential homes located in New York State, (iv) not declare or pay any
dividends upon the shares of its capital stock, and (v) submit quarterly reports on the total
number of and principal balance of loans serviced and its Adjusted Net Worth.
There is no assurance that the New York State Banking Department will find the written capital
plan of FCMC acceptable and not request modifications to the capital plan or deny FCMCs
application for registration as a mortgage servicer or that FCMC will be able to regain compliance
with regulatory net worth requirements in New York State. There is also no assurance that the Bank
(i) will not restrict FCMCs ability to comply with its capital plan, (ii) terminate FCMC as a
servicer of the New York mortgage loans transferred to the Trust, or (iii) sell the New York
mortgage loans transferred to the Trust to an entity that chooses not to retain FCMC as a servicer.
If FCMCs application is denied by the Banking Department, or FCMC is unable or fails to
comply with a written capital plan approved by the Banking Department, FCMC will no longer be able
to service mortgage loans secured by 1-4 family residential homes located in New York State. Under
the Servicing Agreement entered into on March 31, 2009 as part of the Restructuring with the Bank,
it would be an event of default if FCMC failed to maintain its license to do business in any
jurisdiction where any mortgaged property or other real estate property serviced under the
servicing agreement is located if such license is required and such failure continues unremedied
for ten (10) days, which, if the same were to occur, would entitle the Bank to terminate the
Servicing Agreement. In addition, such a failure to obtain or maintain our license to service
mortgages loans as a registered mortgage servicer in New York would be a default under the
Licensing Credit Agreement and Legacy Credit Agreement and with notice, the Bank could also call an
event of default under those agreements entered into in connection with the Restructuring, which,
among other remedies, would entitle the Bank to foreclose on the assets of the Company pledged to
the Bank, including on Franklin Holdings pledge of 70% of the common stock of FCMC.
11
Franklins Business Franklin Credit Management Corporation (FCMC)
As a result of the March 2009 Restructuring and the Reorganization that took effect December
19, 2008, the Companys operating business is conducted principally through FCMC, a specialty
consumer finance company primarily engaged in the servicing and resolution of performing,
reperforming and nonperforming residential mortgage loans, including specialized loan recovery
servicing, and in the due diligence, analysis, pricing and acquisition of residential mortgage
portfolios, for third parties. As a result, FCMC, the servicing company within the Franklin
consolidated group of companies, has positive net worth, has been profitable since January 1, 2009,
and 30% of its equity is free from the pledges to the Bank.
At March 31, 2010, FCMC had total assets of $26.0 million and had stockholders equity of
$19.9 million. FCMC recognized income before tax of approximately $1.1 million and $1.4 million,
respectively, for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, principally from servicing the
portfolio of loans and assets for the Bank and a related party (Bosco). Inter-company servicing
revenues allocated to FCMC during the first quarter of 2009 were based principally on the servicing
contract entered into as part of the Restructuring, which became effective on March 31, 2009. FCMC
charges its sister companies a management fee that is estimated based on internal services rendered
by its employees to those companies. Inter-company allocations, the Federal provision for income
taxes, and cash servicing revenues received from the Bank for servicing its loans during the three
months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009 have been eliminated in deriving the consolidated financial
statements of Franklin. Servicing revenues were eliminated in the consolidated financial
statements of Franklin due to the accounting treatment for the transfer of the trust certificates
as a financing under GAAP Codification of Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) Topic 860,
Transfers and Servicing.
On February 1, 2010, FCMC entered into a collection services agreement, pursuant to which FCMC
agreed to serve as collection agent in the customary manner in connection with approximately 1,500
seriously delinquent and generally unsecured loans, with an unpaid principal balance of
approximately $85 million. These loans were acquired through a trust set up by a fund in which the
Companys Chairman and President is a member and contributed twenty five percent of the purchase
price. Under the collection services agreement, FCMC is entitled to collection fees consisting of
33% of the amount collected, net of third-party expenses. The agreement also provides for
reimbursement of third-party fees and expenses incurred by FCMC in compliance with the agreement.
Loan Servicing
The Companys servicing business is conducted through FCMC, a specialty consumer finance
company primarily engaged in the servicing and resolution of performing, reperforming and
nonperforming residential mortgage loans, including specialized loan recovery servicing, for third
parties.
We have invested to create a loan servicing capability that is focused on collections, loss
mitigation and default management. In general, we seek to ensure that the loans we service for
others are repaid in accordance with the original terms or according to amended repayment terms
negotiated with the borrowers and in accordance with the terms of our servicing contracts with our
servicing customers. Because the loans we service generally experience above average
delinquencies, erratic payment patterns and defaults, our servicing operation is focused on
maintaining close contact with borrowers and as a result, is more labor-intensive than traditional
mortgage servicing operations. Through frequent communication we are able to encourage positive
payment performance, quickly identify those borrowers who are likely to move into seriously
delinquent status and promptly apply appropriate loss mitigation and recovery strategies. Our
servicing staff employs a variety of collection strategies that we have developed to successfully
manage serious delinquencies, bankruptcy and foreclosure. Additionally, we maintain a real estate
department with experience in property management and the sale of residential properties.
12
As of March 31, 2010, FCMC had two significant servicing contracts with third parties to
service 1-4 family mortgage loans and owned real estate, Huntington and Bosco Credit LLC (Bosco).
The portfolios serviced for Huntington (loans previously acquired and originated by Franklin and
transferred to the Trust), primarily consist of first and second-lien loans secured by 1-4 family
residential real estate that generally fell outside the underwriting standards of Fannie Mae and
Freddie Mac.
At March 31, 2010, we serviced and provided recovery collection services on a total population
of approximately 35,000 loans for Huntington and Bosco, and relatively small pools of loans under
recovery collection contracts, whereby we receive fees based solely on a percentage of amounts
collected, for a few other entities. The unpaid principal balance of loans serviced for Huntington
represented approximately 78% of the total loans serviced for third parties at March 31, 2010.
Loan Servicing and Collection Operations
At March 31, 2010, our servicing business consisted of 112 employees who managed approximately
35,000 loans, including approximately 2,500 home equity loans for Bosco. Our servicing operations
are conducted in the following departments:
Loan Boarding and Administration. The primary objective of the loan boarding
department is to ensure that newly acquired loans under contracts to service for others are
properly transitioned from the prior servicer and are accurately boarded onto our servicing
systems. Our loan boarding department audits loan information for accuracy to ensure that the
loans conform to the terms provided in the original note and mortgage. The information boarded
onto our systems provides us with a file that we use to automatically generate introductory letters
to borrowers summarizing the terms of the servicing transfer of their loan, among other standard
industry procedures.
The loan administration department performs typical duties related to the administration of
loans, including incorporating modifications to terms of loans. The loan administration department
also ensures the proper maintenance and disbursement of funds from escrow accounts and monitors
non-escrow accounts for delinquent taxes and insurance lapses. For loans serviced with adjustable
interest rates, the loan administration group ensures that adjustments are properly made and
identified to the affected borrowers in a timely manner.
Customer Service. The primary objective of our customer service department is to
obtain timely payments from borrowers, respond to borrower requests and resolve disputes with
borrowers. Within 10 days of boarding newly acquired loans onto our servicing system, our customer
service representatives contact each new borrower to welcome them to FCMC and to gather and/or
verify any missing information, such as loan balance, interest rate, contact phone numbers, place
of employment, insurance coverage and all other pertinent information required to properly service
the loan. The customer service group responds to all inbound customer calls for information
requests regarding payments, statement balances, escrow balances and taxes, payoff requests,
returned check and late payment fees. In addition, our customer service representatives process
payoff requests and reconveyances.
Client Relations. The principal objective of the client relations group is to
interface with our servicing clients regarding the servicing performance of their loans, and for
invoicing servicing clients. In addition, our client relations group oversees the boarding of new
loans for servicing and/or recovery collections.
13
Collections. The main objective of our collections department is to ensure loan performance
through maintaining customer contact. Our collections group continuously reviews and monitors the
status of collections and individual loan payments in order to proactively identify and solve
potential
collection problems. When a loan becomes seven days past due, our collections group begins
making collection calls and generating past-due letters. Our collections group attempts to
determine whether a past due payment is an aberration or indicative of a more serious delinquency.
If the past due payment appears to be an aberration, we emphasize a cooperative approach and
attempt to assist the borrower in becoming current or arriving at an alternative repayment
arrangement. Upon a serious delinquency, by which we mean a delinquency of sixty-one days by a
borrower, or the earlier determination by our collections group based on the evidence available
that a serious delinquency is likely, the loan is typically transferred to our loss mitigation
department. We employ a range of strategies to modify repayment terms in order to enable the
borrower to make payments and ultimately cure the delinquency, or focus on expediting the
foreclosure process so that loss mitigation can begin as promptly as practicable.
Loss Mitigation. Our loss mitigation department, which consists of staff experienced in
collection work, manages and monitors the progress of seriously delinquent loans and loans which we
believe will develop into serious delinquencies. In addition to maintaining contact with borrowers
through telephone calls and collection letters, this department utilizes various strategies in an
effort to reinstate an account or revive cash flow on an account. The loss mitigation department
analyzes each loan to determine a collection strategy to maximize the amount and speed of recovery
and minimize costs. The particular strategy is based upon each individual borrowers past payment
history, current credit profile, current ability to pay, collateral lien position and current
collateral value. Loss mitigation agents qualify borrowers for relief programs appropriate to the
borrowers hardship and finances. Loss mitigation agents process borrower applications for
Temporary Relief programs (deferments and rate reductions), Expanded Temporary Relief programs (pay
and interest accrue and repayment plans), Homeowner Relief programs (pre-foreclosure home sale) and
Permanent Relief programs (long-term modifications, including those sponsored by the U.S.
Treasurys Home Affordable Modification Program (HAMP)), as well as for settlements, short sales,
and deeds-in-lieu.
Seriously delinquent accounts not resolved through the loss mitigation activities described
above are foreclosed or a judgment is obtained, if potential collection warrants the cost, against
the related borrower in accordance with state and local laws, with the objective of maximizing
asset recovery in the most expeditious manner possible. This is commonly referred to as loss
management. Foreclosure timelines are managed through a timeline report built into the loan
servicing system. The report schedules milestones applicable for each state throughout the
foreclosure process, which enhances our ability to monitor and manage the process. Properties
acquired through foreclosure are transferred to our real estate department to manage eviction and
marketing or renting of the properties. However, until foreclosure is completed, efforts at loss
mitigation generally are continued.
In addition, our loss mitigation department manages loans by borrowers who have declared
bankruptcy. The primary objective of the bankruptcy group within our loss mitigation department,
which utilizes outside legal counsel, is to proactively monitor bankruptcy assets and outside legal
counsel to ensure compliance with individual plans and to ensure recovery in the event of
non-compliance.
Real Estate. The real estate-owned (REO) department is responsible for managing and
or disposing of properties, located throughout the country, acquired through foreclosure in an
orderly, timely, and cost-efficient manner in order to maximize our clients return on assets.
These properties include 1-4 family residences, cooperative apartment and condominium units. We
foreclose on property primarily with the intent to sell it at fair market value to recover a
portion of the outstanding balance owed by the borrower. From time to time, foreclosed properties
may be in need of repair or improvement in order to either increase the value of the property or
reduce the time that the property is on the market. In those cases, the property is evaluated
independently and we make a determination of whether the additional investment might increase the
return upon sale or rental of the property.
14
Deficiency Recovery & Judgment Processing Department (Recovery). The Recovery
department pursues principally hard-to-collect consumer debt on a first, second, or third-placement
basis. Our recovery departments primary objective is to maximize the recovery of unpaid principal
on each seriously delinquent account by offering borrowers multiple workout solutions and/or
negotiated settlements. The recovery unit performs a complete analysis of the borrowers financial
situation, taking into consideration lien status, in order to determine the best course of action.
Based on the results of our analysis, we determine to either continue collection efforts and a
negotiated workout of settlement or seek judgment. Agents may qualify borrowers for Temporary
Relief and Expanded Temporary Relief programs where appropriate. Agents will seek to perfect a
judgment against a borrower and may seek wage garnishment, if economically justified by the
borrowers finances and if provided by the clients servicing agreement.
Face to Face Home Solutions (Face to Face). The Face to Face department seeks to
reestablish connection with incommunicative borrowers and advise borrowers of available loss
mitigation opportunities. Whether successful in meeting with a borrower or not, Face to Face
agents confirm occupancy and report property conditions as well as any evidence of code violation
or additional liens on the property.
Training. Our training department works with all departments of our servicing
operations to ensure that the employees of all departments are fully informed of the procedures
necessary to complete their required tasks. The department ensures all loan servicing employees
are trained in the tenents of the Fair Debt Collection Act as well as in effective communication
skills.
Quality Control. Our quality control department monitors all aspects of loan
servicing from boarding through foreclosure. It is the departments responsibility to ensure that
the companys policies and procedures are followed. Collection calls are monitored to ensure
quality and compliance with the requirements of the federal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act and
state collection laws. Monthly meetings with staff to discuss individual quality control scores
are held and, in certain cases, further training is recommended. Reviews of the controls for
privacy and information safeguarding and document removal are conducted monthly.
Home Affordable Modification Program
On September 11, 2009, FCMC voluntarily entered into an agreement to actively participate as a
mortgage servicer in the Federal governments HAMP for first lien mortgage loans that are not owned
or guaranteed by Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac. HAMP is a program, with borrower, mortgage servicer,
and mortgage loan owner incentives, designed to enable eligible borrowers to avoid foreclosure
through a more affordable and sustainable loan modification made in accordance with HAMP
guidelines, procedures, directives, and requirements. If a borrower is not eligible for HAMP, FCMC
considers other available loss mitigations options, as appropriate for the owner of the loans
serviced. The Bank, as certificate trustee of the Trust, has consented to FCMC modifying eligible
mortgage loans in accordance with HAMP.
Bosco Servicing Agreement
On May 28, 2008, Franklin entered into various agreements (the Bosco Servicing Agreements)
to service on a fee-paying basis for Bosco approximately $245 million in residential home equity
line of credit mortgage loans. Bosco was organized by FCMC, and the membership interests in Bosco
include the Companys Chairman and President, Thomas J. Axon, and a related company of which Mr.
Axon is the chairman of the board and three of the Companys directors serve as board members of
that entity. FCMC began servicing the Bosco portfolio in June 2008. Included in the Companys
consolidated
revenues were servicing fees recognized from servicing the Bosco portfolio of $244,000 and
$636,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively. See Note 10 Related
Party Transactions Bosco Servicing Agreement.
15
On February 27, 2009 and October 28, 2009, the Bosco Servicing Agreement, dated as of May 28,
2008, by and between FCMC and Bosco was revised and amended (the Service Agreement Amendment).
The Service Agreement Amendment effectively reduced the monthly servicing fees payable to FCMC,
revised the fee structure relating to deferred servicing fees and provided for a minimum monthly
servicing fee of $50,000. See Note 10 Related Party Transactions Bosco Servicing
Agreement.
The amount and timing of certain ancillary fees performed by FCMC for Bosco and owed to the
Company is the subject of a good faith dispute between FCMC and the Managing Member of Bosco,
Thomas J. Axon (the Chairman and President of the Company and FCMC). In 2009, the Company wrote
off internal accounting costs associated with services provided by FCMC to Bosco through June 30,
2009 and additional aged receivables, due to non-payment, associated with legal, loan analysis, due
diligence and other services costs incurred by FCMC in 2008 related to the acquisition by Bosco of
its loan portfolio. In addition, effective June 1, 2009 FCMC ceased the accrual of fees for
providing accounting services to Bosco and Bosco has not paid FCMC for any such services. See Note
10 Related Party Transactions Bosco Servicing Agreement.
Due Diligence Services
During 2008, capitalizing on our portfolio acquisition experience with residential mortgage
loans, FCMC began providing services for third parties not related to us or our lender, on a
fee-paying basis. During the first quarter of 2010, we were engaged in due diligence assignments
for two third parties.
2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Basis of Presentation The unaudited consolidated financial statements include the accounts
of the Company and its subsidiaries. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have
been eliminated in consolidation. The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements
have been prepared in accordance with instructions to Form 10-Q. Accordingly, they do not include
all of the information and footnotes required by GAAP for complete financial statements. However,
these unaudited consolidated financial statements include all normal and recurring adjustments that
management believes necessary for a fair statement of results for the periods. These unaudited
consolidated financial statements do not necessarily indicate the results that may be expected for
the full year; the interim financial information should be read in conjunction with our Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009.
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make
estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure
of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported
amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from
those estimates. The Companys estimates and assumptions primarily arise, effective as of the
March 31, 2009 Restructuring, from uncertainties and changes associated with interest rates, credit
exposure and fair market values of its investment in trust certificates and mortgage loans and real
estate held for sale. Although management is not currently aware of any factors that would
significantly change its estimates and assumptions in the near term, future changes in market
trends, market values and interest rates and other conditions may occur which could cause actual
results to differ materially. For additional information refer to the Companys Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009, filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission, and, if applicable, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, which the Company
urges investors to consider.
16
Basic and diluted net loss per share is calculated by dividing net loss attributed to common
shareholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. The
effects of warrants, restricted stock and stock options are excluded from the computation of
diluted earnings per common share in periods in which the effect would be antidilutive. Dilutive
potential common shares are calculated using the treasury stock method. For the three months ended
March 31, 2010 and 2009, 301,000 and 582,000 stock options, respectively, were not included in the
computation of net loss per share because they were antidilutive.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
The FASB has issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) 2009-16, Transfers and Servicing
(Topic 860) Accounting for Transfers of Financial Assets (ASU 2009-16).
ASU 2009-16 requires
more information about transfers of financial assets, including securitization transactions,
eliminates the concept of a qualifying special-purpose entity and changes the requirements for
derecognizing financial assets. ASU 2009-16 is effective at the start of a reporting entitys
first fiscal year beginning after November 15, 2009. The adoption of this standard did not have
any impact on the Companys consolidated financial position and results of operations.
The FASB has published ASU 2009-13, Revenue Recognition Multiple Deliverable Revenue
Arrangements (ASU 2009-13), which addresses the accounting for multiple-deliverable arrangements
to enable vendors to account for products or services (deliverables) separately rather than as a
combined unit. Specifically, this guidance amends the criteria in Subtopic 605-25, Revenue
Recognition Multiple-Element Arrangements, for separating consideration in multiple-deliverable
arrangements. This guidance establishes a selling price hierarchy for determining the selling
price of a deliverable, which is based on: (a) vendor-specific objective evidence; (b) third-party
evidence; or (c) estimates. This guidance also eliminates the residual method of allocation and
requires that arrangement consideration be allocated at the inception of the arrangement to all
deliverables using the relative selling price method and also requires expanded disclosures. FASB
ASU 2009-13 is effective prospectively for revenue arrangements entered into or materially modified
in fiscal years beginning on or after June 15, 2010. Early adoption is permitted. The adoption of
this standard is not expected to have a material impact on the Companys consolidated financial
position and results of operations.
In April 2010, the FASB issued ASU 2010-12, Income Taxes, (Topic 740) Accounting for Certain
Tax Effects of the Health Care Reform Acts (ASU 2010-12). On March 30, 2010, the President of
the United States signed the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010, which is a
reconciliation bill that amends the Patient Protection and Affordable Act that was signed on March
23, 2010 (collectively, the Acts). ASU 2010-12 allows entities to consider the two Acts together
for accounting purposes. The Company does not expect the adoption of this standard to have any
impact on the Companys consolidated financial position and results of operations.
In March 2010, the FASB issued ASU No. 2010-11, which is included in the Codification under
ASC 815, Derivatives and Hedging. This update clarifies the type of embedded credit derivative
that is exempt from embedded derivative bifurcation requirements. Only an embedded credit
derivative that is related to the subordination of one financial instrument to another qualifies
for the exemption. This guidance is effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning
January 1, 2010. The adoption of this standard did not have any impact on the Companys
consolidated financial position and results of operations.
17
In February 2010, the FASB issued ASU 2010-10, Consolidation (Topic 810) (Topic 810). The
amendments to the consolidation requirements of Topic 810 resulting from the issuance of Statement
167 are deferred for a reporting entitys interest in an entity (1) that has all the attributes of
an investment company or (2) for which it is industry practice to apply measurement principles for
financial reporting purposes that are consistent with those followed by investment companies. An
entity that qualifies for the deferral will continue to be assessed under the overall guidance on
the consolidation of variable interest entities in Subtopic 810-10 (before the Statement 167
amendments) or other applicable consolidation guidance, such as the guidance for the consolidation
of partnerships in Subtopic 810-20. The deferral is effective as of the beginning of a reporting
entitys first annual period that begins after November 15, 2009, and for interim periods within
that first annual reporting period, which coincides with the effective date of Statement 167.
Early application is not permitted. The adoption of this standard did not have any impact on the
Companys consolidated financial position and results of operations.
In February 2010, the FASB issued ASU 2010-09, Subsequent Events (Topic 855) Amendments to
Certain Recognition and Disclosure Requirement (ASU 2010-09). ASU 2010-09 requires an entity
that is an SEC filer to evaluate subsequent events through the date that the financial statements
are issued and removes the requirement that an SEC filer disclose the date through which subsequent
events have been evaluated. ASC 2010-09 was effective upon issuance. The adoption of this
standard had no effect on our consolidated financial position or results of operations.
In February 2010, the FASB issued ASU 2010-08, Technical Corrections to Various Topics. This
amendment eliminated inconsistencies and outdated provisions and provided the needed clarifications
to various topics within Topic 815. The amendments are effective for the first reporting period
(including interim periods) beginning after issuance (February 2, 2010), except for certain
amendments. The amendments to the guidance on accounting for income taxes in reorganization
(Subtopic 852-740) should be applied to reorganizations for which the date of the reorganization is
on or after the beginning of the first annual reporting period beginning on or after December 15,
2008. For those reorganizations reflected in interim financial statements issued before the
amendments in this Update are effective, retrospective application is required. The clarifications
of the guidance on the embedded derivates and hedging (Subtopic 815-15) are effective for fiscal
years beginning after December 15, 2009, and should be applied to existing contracts (hybrid
instruments) containing embedded derivative features at the date of adoption. The adoption of this
standard did not have any impact on the Companys consolidated financial position and results of
operations.
In January 2010, the FASB issued ASU 2010-06, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (Topic
820): Improving Disclosures about Fair Value Measurements (ASU 2010-06). This ASU requires some
new disclosures and clarifies some existing disclosure requirements about fair value measurement as
set forth in Codification Subtopic 820-10. ASU 2010-06 amends Codification Subtopic 820-10 and now
requires a reporting entity to use judgment in determining the appropriate classes of assets and
liabilities and to provide disclosures about the valuation techniques and inputs used to measure
fair value for both recurring and nonrecurring fair value measurements. ASU 2010-06 is effective
for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2009. As this standard
relates specifically to disclosures, the adoption did not have an impact on the Companys
consolidated financial position and results of operations.
In January 2010, the FASB issued ASU 2010-01, Equity (Topic 505): Accounting for Distributions
to Shareholders with Components of Stock and Cash (ASU 2010-01). This ASU clarifies that the
stock portion of a distribution to shareholders that allows them to elect to receive cash or stock
with a potential limitation on the total amount of cash that all shareholders can elect to receive
in the aggregate is considered a share issuance that is reflected in earnings per share
prospectively and is not a stock dividend. ASU 2010-01 is effective for interim and annual periods
ending on or after December 15,
2009, and should be applied on a retrospective basis. The adoption of this standard did not
have any impact on the Companys consolidated financial position and results of operations.
18
In December 2009, the FASB issued ASU 2009-17, Consolidations (Topic 810) Improvements to
Financial Reporting by Enterprises Involved with Variable Interest Entities (ASU 2009-17). ASU
2009-17 changes how a reporting entity determines when an entity that is insufficiently capitalized
or is not controlled through voting (or similar rights) should be consolidated. This determination
is based on, among other things, the other entitys purpose and design and the Companys ability to
direct the activities of the other entity that most significantly impact the other entitys
economic performance. ASU 2009-17 is effective at the start of the Companys first fiscal year
beginning after November 15, 2009. The adoption of this standard did not have any impact on the
Companys consolidated financial position and results of operations.
3. INVESTMENT IN TRUST CERTIFICATES AT FAIR VALUE, MORTGAGE LOANS AND REAL ESTATE HELD FOR SALE,
AND NOTES RECEIVABLE HELD FOR SALE
Investment in Trust certificates, carried at estimated fair value, as of March 31, 2010,
consists principally of the trust certificates not transferred to the Banks REIT as of the
Restructuring (representing approximately 17% of the Portfolio as of March 31, 2009). Activity for
the three months ended March 31, 2010 is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, 2010 |
|
Balance, January 1 |
|
$ |
69,355,735 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trust distributions |
|
|
(3,142,005 |
) |
Transfers (out) |
|
|
(640,045 |
) |
Fair value adjustments, net |
|
|
2,005,836 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, March 31 |
|
$ |
67,579,521 |
|
|
|
|
|
The fair value adjustments include a reduction in the estimated market value of the pro
rata percentage of loans underlying the Trust certificates of approximately $617,000 and a gain on
the Trust distributions of approximately $2.6 million.
Mortgage loans and real estate held for sale, carried at lower of cost or estimated fair
value, as of March 31, 2010 consists principally of the trust certificates transferred to the
Banks REIT as of the Restructuring (representing approximately 83% of the Portfolio as of March
31, 2009). Activity for the three months ended March 31, 2010 is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, 2010 |
|
Balance, January 1 |
|
$ |
345,441,865 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
REO sales |
|
|
(3,180,865 |
) |
Principal payments |
|
|
(7,634,242 |
) |
Loans written off |
|
|
(7,021 |
) |
Fair value adjustments, net |
|
|
1,975,296 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, March 31 |
|
$ |
336,595,033 |
|
|
|
|
|
19
The fair value adjustments include a reduction in the estimated market value of the pro
rata percentage of loans underlying the mortgage loans and real estate held for sale of
approximately $3.1 million and a gain on the REO sales proceeds and the principal payments of
approximately $5.0 million.
Notes receivable held for sale, carried at lower of cost or estimated fair value, as of March
31, 2010 consists principally of the Companys loans securing the Unrestructured Debt. Activity
for the three months ended March 31, 2010 is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, 2010 |
|
Balance, January 1 |
|
$ |
3,575,323 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal payments |
|
|
(241,619 |
) |
Loans written off |
|
|
(4,748 |
) |
Fair value adjustments, net |
|
|
16,184 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, March 31 |
|
$ |
3,345,140 |
|
|
|
|
|
The fair value adjustments include a reduction in the estimated market value of the notes
receivable held for sale of approximately $172,000 and a gain on the principal payments of
approximately $188,000.
4. FAIR VALUATION ADJUSTMENTS
Fair valuation adjustments include amounts subsequent to March 31, 2009 related to adjustments
in the fair value of the investment in trust certificates, the nonrecourse liability, and
adjustments to the lower of cost or market related to mortgage loans and real estate held for sale,
and for losses on sales of real estate owned.
The following table sets forth the activity since the Restructuring affecting the fair
valuation adjustments during the three months ended March 31, 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, 2010 |
|
Gain on OREO sold |
|
$ |
1,772,900 |
|
Valuation gain on mortgage loans and OREO |
|
|
1,975,296 |
|
Valuation (loss) on nonrecourse liability |
|
|
(1,975,296 |
) |
Valuation gain on trust certificates |
|
|
2,005,836 |
|
Valuation gain on notes receivable |
|
|
16,184 |
|
Other adjustments |
|
|
(7,565,962 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) on valuation |
|
$ |
(3,771,042 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Other adjustments include estimated fair market value adjustments to offsets to the other
real estate owned (or OREO) gains of approximately $2.4 million and the offset to the interest and
other income recorded on the mortgage loans of approximately $5.2 million.
5. DERIVATIVES
As part of the Companys interest-rate risk management process, the Company entered into
interest rate swap agreements in 2008. In accordance with ASC Topic 815, Derivatives and Hedging
(Topic 815), as amended and interpreted, derivative financial instruments are reported on the
consolidated balance sheets at their fair value.
20
The Companys management of interest-rate risk predominantly includes the use of plain-vanilla
interest-rate swaps to synthetically convert a portion of its London Interbank Offered Rate
(LIBOR)-based variable-rate debt to fixed-rate debt. In accordance with Topic 815, derivative
contracts hedging the risks associated with expected future cash flows are designated as cash flow
hedges. The Company formally documents at the inception of its hedges all relationships between
hedging instruments and the related hedged items, as well as its interest risk management
objectives and strategies for undertaking various accounting hedges. Additionally, we use
regression analysis at the inception of the hedge and for each reporting period thereafter to
assess the derivatives hedge effectiveness in offsetting changes in the cash flows of the hedged
items. The Company discontinues hedge accounting if it is determined that a derivative is not
expected to be or has ceased to be highly effective as a hedge, and then reflects changes in the
fair value of the derivative in earnings. All of the Companys interest-rate swaps qualify for
cash flow hedge accounting, and are so designated.
As of March 31, 2010, the notional amount of the Companys fixed-rate interest rate swaps
totaled $390 million, representing approximately 32% of the Companys outstanding variable rate
debt. The fixed-rate interest rate swaps are expected to reduce the Companys exposure to future
increases in interest costs on a portion of its borrowings due to increases in one-month LIBOR
during the remaining terms of the swap agreements. All of our interest rate swaps were executed
with the Bank.
In conjunction with the Restructuring, and at the request of the Bank, effective March 31,
2009, the Company exercised its right to terminate two non-amortizing fixed-rate interest rate
swaps with the Bank, one with a notional amount of $150 million and the other with a notional
amount of $240 million. The total termination fee for cancellation of the swaps was $8.2 million,
which is payable only to the extent cash is available under the waterfall provisions of the Legacy
Credit Agreement, and only after the first $764.5 million of debt (the amount designated as tranche
A debt remaining at March 31, 2010) owed to the Bank has been paid in full. The carrying value
included in accumulated other comprehensive loss (AOCL) within stockholders equity at March 31,
2010 and December 31, 2009, which is related to the terminated hedges, is amortized to earnings
over time.
As of December 31, 2008, the Company removed the hedge designations for its cash flow hedges.
As a result, the Company continues to carry the December 31, 2008 balance related to these hedges
in AOCL unless it becomes probable that the forecasted cash flows will not occur. The balance in
AOCL as of March 31, 2010 is amortized to earnings as part of interest expense in the same period
or periods during which the hedge forecasted transaction affects earnings. During the three months
ended March 31, 2010, the net impact of the cash flow hedges was an increase of $5.5 million to
interest expense, inclusive of $3.3 million of amortization of the AOCL balance and reclassified
from AOCL into earnings, the cost of the hedges in the amount of $3.0 million, somewhat offset by
an increase of $767,000 in the fair value of the existing swaps. During the three months ended
March 31, 2009, the net impact of the cash flow hedges was an increase of $8.1 million to interest
expense, inclusive of $3.9 million of amortization of the AOCL balance and reclassified from AOCL
into earnings, the cost of the hedges in the amount of $5.1 million, somewhat offset by an increase
of $967,000 in the fair value of the existing swaps. Changes in the fair value of the remaining
interest-rate swaps are accounted for directly in earnings.
21
The following table presents the notional and fair value amounts of the interest rate swaps at
March 31, 2010.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notional Amount |
|
|
Term |
|
|
Maturity Date |
|
|
Fixed Rate |
|
|
Estimated Fair Value |
|
$ |
275,000,000 |
|
|
3 years |
|
|
March 5, 2011 |
|
|
|
3.47 |
% |
|
$ |
(8,621,583 |
) |
|
70,000,000 |
|
|
3 years |
|
|
March 5, 2011 |
|
|
|
3.11 |
% |
|
|
(1,702,058 |
) |
|
45,000,000 |
|
|
4 years |
|
|
March 5, 2012 |
|
|
|
3.43 |
% |
|
|
(1,983,894 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
390,000,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(12,307,535 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate swaps increased our interest expense for the three months ended March 31,
2010 and 2009 by $5.5 million and $8.1 million, respectively. The estimated fair value of the
swaps at March 31, 2010 was a negative $12.3 million.
The net changes in the fair value of the Companys derivatives, which is reflected in
derivative liabilities, at fair value, for the three months ended March 31, 2010 is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, 2010 |
|
Balance, January 1 |
|
$ |
(13,144,591 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Cash settlements |
|
|
3,021,296 |
|
Fair value adjustments |
|
|
(2,184,240 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, March 31 |
|
$ |
(12,307,535 |
) |
|
|
|
|
6. FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
Topic 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures, establishes a three-tier hierarchy for
fair value measurements based upon the transparency of the inputs to the valuation of an asset or
liability and expands the disclosures about instruments measured at fair value. A financial
instrument is categorized in its entirety and its categorization within the hierarchy is based upon
the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. The three levels are
described below.
|
|
|
Level 1 Inputs to the valuation methodology are quoted prices (unadjusted) for
identical assets or liabilities in active markets. |
|
|
|
Level 2 Inputs to the valuation methodology include quoted prices for similar
assets and liabilities in active markets and inputs that are observable for the asset
of liability, either directly or indirectly, for substantially the full term of the
financial instrument. Fair values for these instruments are estimated using pricing
models, quoted prices of securities with similar characteristics, or discounted cash
flows. |
|
|
|
Level 3 Inputs to the valuation methodology are unobservable and significant to
the fair value measurement. Fair values are initially valued based upon transaction
price and are adjusted to reflect exit values as evidenced by financing and sale
transactions with third parties. |
Fair values for over-the-counter interest rate contracts are determined from market observable
inputs, including the LIBOR curve and measures of volatility, used to determine fair values are
considered Level 2, observable market inputs.
22
Fair values for certain investments (Level 3 assets) are determined using pricing models,
discounted cash flow methodologies or similar techniques and at least one significant model
assumption or input is unobservable.
The carrying value of derivative and financial instruments on the Companys financial
statements at March 31, 2010 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Level 1 |
|
|
Level 2 |
|
|
Level 3 |
|
|
Level 3 |
|
Interest-rate swaps |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(12,307,535 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Investment in trust certificates |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
67,579,521 |
|
|
|
|
|
Nonrecourse liability |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(336,595,033 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(12,307,535 |
) |
|
$ |
67,579,521 |
|
|
$ |
(336,595,033 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The changes in items classified as Level 3 during the three months ended March 31, 2010
are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments |
|
|
Liabilities |
|
Balance, January 1, 2010 |
|
$ |
69,355,735 |
|
|
$ |
(345,441,865 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total unrealized gains/(losses) |
|
|
2,005,836 |
|
|
|
(7,159,260 |
) |
Transfers in/(out) |
|
|
(640,045 |
) |
|
|
7,021 |
|
Distributions/payments |
|
|
(3,142,005 |
) |
|
|
15,999,071 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, March 31, 2010 |
|
$ |
67,579,521 |
|
|
$ |
(336,595,033 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized gains included in earnings during the three months ended March 31, 2010
related to investments held at March 31, 2010 amounted to $2.0 million.
The carrying value of assets measured at the lower of cost or market value at March 31, 2010
is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Level 1 |
|
|
Level 2 |
|
|
Level 3 |
|
Mortgage loans and real estate held for sale |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
336,595,033 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7. NOTES PAYABLE AND FINANCING AGREEMENTS
As of March 31, 2010, the Company had total borrowings, Notes payable and financing
agreements, of $1.37 billion under the Restructuring Agreements, of which $1.33 billion was subject
to the Legacy Credit Agreement and $39.1 million remained under a credit facility excluded from the
Restructuring Agreements (the Unrestructured Debt). Substantially all of the debt under these
facilities was incurred in connection with the Companys purchase and origination of residential
1-4 family mortgage loans prior to December 2007. We ceased to acquire and originate loans in
November 2007, and under the terms of the Restructuring Agreements, the Company cannot originate or
acquire mortgage loans or other assets without the prior consent of the Bank. These borrowings are
shown in the Companys financial statements as Notes payable (referred to as term loans or
term debt herein).
At March 31, 2010, FCMC owed $1 million under the revolving line of its Licensing Credit
Agreement with the Bank, which is shown in the Companys financial statements as Financing
agreement.
23
Restructuring Agreements with Lead Lending Bank
Prior to the March 31, 2009 restructuring agreements that we entered into with Huntington, our
indebtedness was governed by forbearance agreements and prior credit and warehousing agreements
with Huntington. Effective as of March 31, 2009, all of our borrowings, with the exception of the
Unrestructured Debt in the current amount of $39.1 million, are governed by credit agreements
entered into as part of the Restructuring Agreements.
March 2009 Restructuring
On March 31, 2009, Franklin Holding, and certain of its direct and indirect subsidiaries,
including Franklin Credit Management Corporation and Tribeca Lending Corp., entered into a series
of agreements (collectively, the Restructuring Agreements) with the Bank, successor by merger to
Sky Bank, pursuant to which the Companys loans, pledges and guarantees with the Bank and its
participating banks were substantially restructured, and approximately 83% of the Portfolio was
transferred to Huntington Capital Financing, LLC (the REIT), a real estate investment trust
wholly-owned by the Bank.
The Restructuring did not include a portion of the Companys debt (the Unrestructured Debt),
which as of March 31, 2009 totaled approximately $40.7 million. The Unrestructured Debt remains
subject to the original terms of the Franklin Forbearance Agreement entered into with the Bank in
December 2007 and subsequent amendments thereto and the Franklin 2004 master credit agreement. On
March 26, 2010, Franklin Holding, and certain of its direct and indirect subsidiaries, including
FCMC and Franklin Asset entered into another amendment to the Franklin Forbearance Agreement and
Franklin 2004 master credit agreement with the Bank relating to the Unrestructured Debt that
extends the term of the forbearance period until June 30, 2010. See Note 7 Notes
Payable and Financing Agreements Forbearance Agreement with Lead Lending Bank.
The Franklin Forbearance Agreement and the Tribeca forbearance agreement that had been entered
into with the Bank were, except for approximately $39.1 million of the Companys debt outstanding
at March 31, 2010, replaced effective March 31, 2009 by the Restructuring Agreements.
In conjunction with the Restructuring, and at the request of the Bank, effective March 31,
2009, the Company exercised its right to terminate two non-amortizing fixed-rate interest rate
swaps with the Bank, one with a notional amount of $150 million and the other with a notional
amount of $240 million. The total termination fee for cancellation of the swaps was $8.2 million,
which is payable only to the extent cash is available under the waterfall provisions of the Legacy
Credit Agreement, and only after the first $837.9 million (the amount designated as tranche A debt
as of March 31, 2009) of term debt has been paid in full. At March 31, 2010, $764.5
million of this tranche of debt remained to be paid off before payment of the swap termination fee
is triggered. The Company has other non-amortizing fixed-rate interest rate swaps with the Bank,
which have not been terminated.
On June 25, 2009, also in connection with the Restructuring and with the approval of the
holders of more than two-thirds of the shares of Franklin Holding entitled to vote at an election
of directors, the Certificate of Incorporation of FCMC was amended to delete the provision, adopted
pursuant to Section 251(g) of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware in connection
with the Companys December 2008 corporate reorganization, that had required the approval of the
stockholders of Franklin Holding in addition to the stockholders of FCMC for any action or
transaction, other than the election or removal of directors, that would require the approval of
the stockholders of FCMC.
24
Background to the Restructuring. The severe deterioration in the U.S. housing market and the
nearly complete shutdown of the mortgage credit market for most borrowers in the latter part of
2007 and
throughout 2008, coupled with the severe economic slowdown and rapidly rising unemployment
during 2008, resulted in increased delinquencies, provisions for loan losses, operating losses, and
decreased cash flows for the Company. The impact on the Companys operations was severe, and
included (i) a substantial and growing shortfall in cash collections from the portfolio of mortgage
loans and real estate owned relative to the Companys debt service obligations owed to the Bank,
(ii) a substantial and growing shortfall in the value of the Companys assets, relative to the
amounts owed to the Bank, (iii) concern by potential servicing customers and other constituencies
over the continued viability of the Company, including the viability of FCMC, the Companys
servicing platform, and (iv) concern that the Bank was increasingly likely to: (a) cease granting
necessary waivers and forbearances with respect to defaults under the Companys various credit
facilities; and, (b) declare a default with respect to the credit facilities and foreclose on the
assets of the Company, substantially all of which were pledged to the Bank, especially in light of
communications from the Bank indicating that it was seeking greater and more direct control over
the collection guidelines related to the assets in the Portfolio and may have needed to foreclose
on the Portfolio if it were not able to consummate a transaction like the Restructuring in which it
was able to gain control over the Portfolio while keeping the credit facilities outstanding. Such
a foreclosure would have left no value for the Companys stockholders.
In order to address these issues, accommodate the concerns of the Bank to take advantage of
what the Company believes is the best option to preserve value for its stockholders, the Company
negotiated and entered into the Restructuring, which was approved by the Companys Board of
Directors.
Summary of the Restructuring. Key attributes of the Restructuring, as they relate to the
Companys legacy indebtedness to the Bank include:
|
(1) |
|
in exchange for the transfer of that part of the Portfolio underlying the Bank
Trust Certificates (as defined below), the Company received common membership interests
and Class C preferred membership interests in the REIT having in the aggregate a value
intended to approximate the fair market value of that portion of the Portfolio
transferred to the Bank, which as of March 31, 2009 was approximately $477.3 million
(the REIT Securities). The preferred membership interests have a liquidation value
of $100,000 per unit and an annual cumulative dividend rate of 9% of such liquidation
value. Any dividends on the preferred shares shall be payable only out of funds
legally available for the payment thereof; |
|
(2) |
|
principal and interest payments in respect of the Legacy Credit Agreement are
only due and payable to the extent of cash flow of the Company, which cash flow would
include dividends declared and paid in respect of the REIT Securities or any other
assets of the Company, other than the retained interest in FCMC (as discussed below);
and, |
|
(3) |
|
the Banks recourse in respect of the Legacy Credit Agreement is limited to the
assets and stock of Franklin Holdings subsidiaries, excluding the assets of FCMC
(except for a first lien of the Bank on an office condominium unit and a second
priority lien of the Bank on cash collateral held as security under the Licensing
Credit Agreement) and a portion of FCMCs stock, representing not less than twenty-five
percent (since Level 1 referenced below was not achieved) and not more than seventy
percent of FCMCs common equity, based on the amounts received by the Bank from the
cash collections from FCMCs servicing of the Portfolio as discussed in more detail
below. Under the terms and conditions of the Restructuring Agreements, FCMC may pay
dividends or other distributions in respect of its capital stock if FCMC delivers to
the Bank a payment to be applied to outstanding obligations under the Legacy Credit
Agreement equal to seventy percent of any such distribution or dividend that FCMC
elects to make or declare, which percentage share may be reduced to twenty-five percent
(since Level 1 referenced below was not achieved) based upon the
Banks receipt of the agreed amounts of net remittances from the Portfolio summarized
below. |
25
From the perspective of the Company and its stockholders, the Restructuring accomplished a
number of overarching objectives, including:
|
(1) |
|
release of thirty percent of the equity in FCMC, ten percent of which has been
transferred to the Companys principal stockholder, Thomas J. Axon, from the Companys
pledges to the Bank in respect of its Legacy Credit Agreement, with the possibility of
release of up to an additional fifty percent (which is now forty-five percent due to
the failure to achieve Level 1 referenced below and of which a maximum of ten percent
would go to Thomas J. Axon), based upon the Banks receipt of the agreed amounts of net
remittances from the Portfolio, summarized below (the Net Remittances), from March
31, 2009, the effective date of the Legacy Credit Agreement (the Legacy Effective
Date), through the term of the Legacy Credit Agreement; the Bank shall reduce its
interest in the equity in FCMC, as collateral, in accordance with the following
collection levels; |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minimum Amount |
|
|
|
|
|
|
of Net Remittances |
|
|
|
|
Level |
|
(Minimum Level Amount) |
|
Time Period |
|
Release of Equity Interests |
Level 1
|
|
$225 million*
|
|
1 year from the Legacy Effective Date*
|
|
10% (70% reduces to 60%)* |
Level 2
|
|
$475 million
|
|
3 years from the Legacy Effective Date
|
|
10% (60% reduces to 50%) |
Level 3
|
|
$575 million
|
|
No time period specified
|
|
10% (50% reduces to 40%) |
Level 4
|
|
$650 million
|
|
No time period specified
|
|
10% (40% reduces to 30%) |
Level 5
|
|
$750 million
|
|
No time period specified
|
|
10% (30% reduces to 20%) |
|
(2) |
|
entry into a servicing agreement enabling the Company to receive fee income in
respect of its continued servicing of the transferred Portfolio; and, |
|
(3) |
|
entry into amended credit facilities in the aggregate principal amount of $13.5
million, including a $5 million facility for working capital and to support various
servicer licenses, a $2 million revolving facility and a $6.5 million letter of credit
facility to support various servicer licenses. |
|
|
|
* |
|
Provided, however, (i) if Net Remittances do not reach the minimum Level 1 amount prior to
the first anniversary of the Legacy Effective Date (which is what occurred), but reach the
minimum Level 2 amount prior to the third anniversary of the Legacy Effective Date, the Bank
shall retain, as collateral, 55% of the FCMC equity instead of 50%, as currently scheduled,
and any subsequent reductions in the amount of FCMC equity pledged to the Bank shall be 10%;
and provided further that (ii) if Net Remittances do not reach the minimum Level 1 amount
prior to the first anniversary of the Legacy Effective Date and do not reach the minimum Level
2 amount prior to the third anniversary of the Legacy Effective Date, then the schedule for
release of the equity interests in FCMC currently pledged to the Bank shall be as follows: (x)
upon attaining the minimum Level 3 amount, the pledged equity interests in FCMC shall reduce
25% (from 70% to 45%); (y) upon attaining the minimum Level 4 amount, the pledged equity
interests in FCMC shall reduce an additional 10% (from 45% to 35%), and (z) upon attaining the
minimum Level 5 amount, the pledged equity interests in FCMC shall reduce an additional 10%
(from 35% to 25%). |
Among the most significant costs of accomplishing these objectives were:
|
(1) |
|
the possible transfer of ownership of a portion of FCMC, including a minimum of
twenty-five percent (since Level 1 was not achieved) and a maximum of seventy percent,
to the Bank at maturity of the Companys Legacy Credit Agreement with the Bank, unless
further extended
if the Company is not otherwise able to satisfy or refinance the Legacy Credit Agreement
prior to maturity; |
26
|
(2) |
|
the transfer of ten percent of ownership of FCMC to Franklin Holdings
principal stockholder, Thomas J. Axon, as the cost of obtaining certain guarantees and
pledges required by the Bank as a condition of the restructuring, subject to increase
to an additional ten percent should the pledge of common shares of FCMC by Franklin
Holding to the Bank be reduced upon the attainment by FCMC of certain net collection
targets set by the Bank with respect to the Portfolio; |
|
(3) |
|
entry into a service agreement with respect to FCMCs continued servicing of
the Portfolio that allows the Bank to terminate such servicing and, concomitantly,
FCMCs fee income from servicing the Portfolio; and, |
|
(4) |
|
the Company may incur significant income tax liabilities as a result in part of
a tax basis transfer, at termination of the Legacy Credit Agreement, liquidation of the
Company or any of its direct or indirect subsidiary companies, or certain other Company
events such as a de facto liquidation. The amount of any tax liability that the
Company may incur is not certain since any such calculations need to be performed on a
company by company basis and are influenced by a number of factors including, but not
limited to, the ability to use prior year losses and future results of operations. |
Restructuring Agreements. In connection with the Restructuring, the Company and its
subsidiaries:
1. |
|
Transferred substantially the entire Portfolio in exchange for the REIT Securities. |
Pursuant to the terms of a Transfer and Assignment Agreement, certain subsidiaries of the
Company (the Franklin Transferring Entities) transferred approximately 83% of the Portfolio to a
newly formed Delaware statutory trust (New Trust) in exchange for the following trust
certificates (collectively, the Trust Certificates):
|
(a) |
|
an undivided 100% interest of the Banks portion of consumer mortgage
loans (the Bank Consumer Loan Certificate); |
|
(b) |
|
an undivided 100% interest in the Banks portion of consumer REO assets
(the Bank Consumer REO Certificate, and together with the Bank Consumer Loan
Certificate, the Bank Trust Certificates); |
|
(c) |
|
an undivided 100% interest in the portion of consumer mortgage loan
assets allocated to the M&I Marshall & Ilsley Bank (M&I) and BOS (USA) Inc.
(BOS) (M&I and BOS collectively, the Participants) represented by two
certificates (the Participants Consumer Loan Certificates); and, |
|
(d) |
|
an undivided 100% interest in Participants portion of the consumer REO
assets represented by two certificates (the Participants Consumer REO
Certificates, and together with the Participants Consumer Loan Certificate, the
Participants Trust Certificates). |
27
The Bank Trust Certificates represent approximately 83.27961% of the assets transferred to New
Trust considered in the aggregate (such portion, the Bank Contributed Assets) and the
Participants
Trust Certificates represent approximately 16.72039% of the assets transferred to New Trust
considered in the aggregate.
Pursuant to the Transfer and Assignment Agreement, the Franklin Transferring Entities made
certain representations, warranties and covenants to New Trust related to the Portfolio. To the
extent any Franklin Selling Entity breaches any such representations, warranties and covenants and
the Franklin Transferring Entities are unable to cure such breach, New Trust has recourse against
the Franklin Transferring Entities (provided that recourse to FCMC is limited solely to instances
whereby FCMC transferred REO property FCMC did not own) (the Reacquisition Parties). In such
instances, the Reacquisition Parties are obligated to repurchase any mortgage loan or REO property
and indemnify New Trust, the Bank, the Administrator (as defined below), the holders of the Trust
Certificates and the trustees to the trust agreement. The Franklin Transferring Entities provided
representations and warranties, including but not limited to correct information, loans have not
been modified, loans are in force, valid lien, compliance with laws, licensing, enforceability of
the mortgage loans, hazardous substances, fraud, and insurance coverage. In addition, the Franklin
Transferring Entities agreed to provide certain collateral documents for each mortgage loan and REO
property transferred (except to the extent any collateral deficiency was disclosed to New Trust).
To the extent any collateral deficiency exists with respect to such mortgage loan or REO property
and the Franklin Transferring Entities do not cure such deficiency, the Reacquisition Parties shall
be obligated to repurchase such mortgage loan. In connection with the reacquisition of any asset,
the price to be paid by the Reacquisition Parties for such asset (the Reacquisition Price) shall
be as agreed upon by the Administrator and the applicable Reacquisition Party; provided, however,
should such parties not promptly come to agreement, the Reacquisition Price shall be as determined
by the Administrator in good faith using its sole discretion.
The subsidiaries then transferred the Trust Certificates to a newly formed Delaware limited
liability company, Franklin Asset, LLC, in exchange for membership interests in Franklin Asset,
LLC. Franklin Asset, LLC then contributed the Bank Trust Certificates to a newly formed Delaware
limited liability company, Franklin Asset Merger Sub, LLC, in exchange for membership interests in
Franklin Asset Merger Sub, LLC (Franklin Asset, LLC retained the Participant Trust Certificates).
Franklin Merger Sub, LLC merged with and into a Huntington National Bank wholly-owned subsidiary of
the REIT (REIT Sub) and Franklin Asset, LLC received the REIT Securities having in the aggregate
a value equal to the estimated fair market value of the loans underlying the Bank Trust
Certificates, which as of March 31, 2009 was approximately $477.3 million, in exchange for its
membership interests in Franklin Asset Merger Sub, LLC. The preferred REIT Securities have a
liquidation value of $100,000 per unit and an annual cumulative dividend rate of 9% of such
liquidation value. If there is a reacquisition required to be made by the Reacquisition Parties
under the Transfer and Assignment Agreement, Franklin Asset, LLC will return such number of Class C
Preferred Shares of Huntington Capital Financing Stock that is equal in value to the Reacquisition
Price (as defined in the Transfer and Assignment Agreement).
2. |
|
Amended and restated substantially all of its outstanding debt. |
Pursuant to the terms of the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement (Legacy) (the Legacy
Credit Agreement), the Company amended and restated substantially all of its indebtedness
currently subject to a certain First Amended and Restated Forbearance Agreement and Amendment to
Credit Agreements, dated December 19, 2008, and a certain First Amended and Restated Tribeca
forbearance agreement and Amendment to Credit Agreements, dated December 19, 2008 (the Forbearance
Agreements). As more fully described below, pursuant to the terms of the Legacy Credit Agreement,
(1) the Participant Trust Certificates were collaterally assigned to the Bank as collateral for the
loans as modified pursuant to the terms of the Legacy Credit Agreement (the Restructured Loans);
(2) all net collections received by New Trust in connection with the portion of the
28
Portfolio
represented by the Bank Trust Certificates will be paid to the REIT Sub or its subsidiaries; (3) the REIT Securities
were pledged to the Bank as collateral for the Restructured Loans; (4) Franklin Holding pledged
seventy percent (70%) of the common equity in FCMC to the Bank as collateral for the Restructured
Loans; and (5) Franklin Holding and FCMC were released from existing guarantees of the Restructured
Loans, including Franklin Holdings pledge of 100% of the outstanding shares of FCMC. In exchange,
Franklin Holding and FCMC provided certain limited recourse guarantees relating to the Restructured
Loans, wherein the Bank agreed to exercise only limited recourse against property encumbered by the
pledge agreement (the Pledged Collateral) made in connection with the Legacy Credit Agreement,
provided Franklin Holding and FCMC, respectively, any designee acting under the authority thereof
or any subsidiary of either Franklin Holding or FCMC did not (i) commission any act fraud or
material misrepresentation in respect of the Pledged Collateral; (ii) divert, embezzle or misapply
proceeds, funds or money and/or other property relating in any way to the Pledged Collateral; (iii)
breach any covenant under Article IV of the Pledge Agreement entered into by Franklin Holding; or
(iv) conduct any business activities to perform diligence services, to service mortgage Loans or
REO Properties or any related activities, directly or indirectly, other than by FCMC and Franklin
Credit Loan Servicing, LLC (all of which are referred to as exceptions to nonrecourse).
The terms of the Legacy Credit Agreement vary according to the three tranches of loans covered
by the Legacy Credit Agreement. At March 31, 2009, Tranche A included outstanding debt in the
approximate principal sum of $837.9 million bearing interest at a per annum rate equal to one-month
LIBOR plus 2.25% per annum, payable monthly in arrears on the outstanding principal balance of the
related advances; Tranche B included outstanding debt in the approximate principal sum of $407.5
million bearing interest at a per annum rate equal to one-month LIBOR plus 2.75% per annum, payable
monthly in arrears on the outstanding principal balance of the related advances; and, Tranche C
included outstanding debt in the approximate principal sum of $125 million bearing interest at a
per annum rate equal to 15%, payable monthly in arrears on the outstanding principal balance of the
related advances. In the event of a default, the applicable interest rate will increase to 5% over
the rate otherwise applicable to the respective tranche.
Terms of the Restructured Indebtedness Under the Legacy Credit Agreement. The following table
summarizes the principal economic terms of the Companys indebtedness under the Legacy Credit
Agreement immediately following the Restructuring.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding |
|
|
Outstanding |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal Amount |
|
|
Principal Amount |
|
|
Applicable Interest |
|
|
Required Monthly |
|
|
|
at March 31, 2009 |
|
|
at March 31, 2010 |
|
|
Margin Over LIBOR |
|
|
Principal |
|
|
|
Franklin Asset/Tribeca |
|
|
Franklin Asset/Tribeca |
|
|
(basis points) |
|
|
Amortization |
|
Tranche A |
|
$ |
838,000,000 |
|
|
$ |
765,000,000 |
|
|
|
225 |
|
|
None |
|
Tranche B |
|
$ |
407,000,000 |
|
|
$ |
420,000,000 |
|
|
|
275 |
|
|
None |
|
Tranche C |
|
$ |
125,000,000 |
|
|
$ |
145,000,000 |
|
|
|
N/A |
(1) |
|
None |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrestructured Debt |
|
$ |
41,000,000 |
|
|
$ |
39,000,000 |
|
|
|
|
(2) |
|
None |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The applicable interest rate is fixed at 15% per annum. Interest will be paid in kind
during the term of the Restructuring. |
|
(2) |
|
Interest margin over FHLB 30-day LIBOR advance rate plus 2.60%-2.75%. |
The interest rate under the terms of the Restructuring Agreements for Tranche A and
Tranche B indebtedness that is the basis, or index, for the Companys interest cost is the
one-month LIBOR plus applicable margins. In accordance with the terms of the Restructuring
Agreements, interest due and unpaid on Tranche B and Tranche C debt is accrued and added to the
debt balance.
29
All cash available for each tranche shall be used to pay cash interest to the extent cash is
available, and any accrued interest for which cash is not available will be added to the principal
sum of such tranche. Cash payments on each tranche will be made from: (i) any cash or other assets
of the borrowers (Tribeca and certain subsidiaries of Tribeca and Franklin Asset), (ii) dividends
and distributions on the REIT Securities, all of which shall be applied as a non pro rata
distribution solely to the Banks pro rata share of such tranche (until paid in full), (iii) all
distributions made by New Trust on the Participant Trust Certificates, all of which shall be
applied as a non pro rata distribution to the Participants pro rata shares of such tranche (until
paid in full), and (iv) from any proceeds received from any other collateral, which will be applied
pursuant to a waterfall provision described more fully in the Legacy Credit Agreement. The
borrowers will not be required to make scheduled principal payments, provided that all amounts
received by any borrower in excess of accrued interest, whether from collateral or otherwise, shall
be applied to reduce the principal sum. All remaining principal and interest will be due and
payable at maturity of the Legacy Credit Agreement on March 31, 2012. Based on the current cash
flows described above, it is not expected that that the Company will be able to repay remaining
principal and interest due on March 31, 2012. Under such circumstances, the Bank would have all
available rights and remedies under the Legacy Credit Agreement.
In accordance with the terms of the Legacy Credit Agreement, during the three months ended
March 31, 2010, the outstanding balance of Tranche B increased from $417.2 million to $420.3
million and the outstanding balance of Tranche C increased from $140.1 million to $145.4 million,
due to the addition of accrued interest for which cash was not available to pay the interest due.
During the quarter ended March 31, 2010, the increases in the outstanding balances of Tranches B
and C, resulted in the total balance of debt outstanding under the Legacy Credit Agreement to
increase slightly from $1.328 billion at December 31, 2009 to $1.330 billion at March 31, 2010.
The Legacy Credit Agreement contains representations, warranties, covenants and events of
default (the Legacy Credit Agreement Defaults) that are customary in transactions similar to the
restructuring. Some, but not all, of the Legacy Credit Agreement Defaults (including defaults
under provisions relating to enforceability, bankruptcy, maintenance of collateral and lien
positions, and certain negative covenants typical for agreements of this nature) will create an
event of default under the Licensing Credit Agreement and the Servicing Agreement (as defined
below). Under such circumstances, the Bank would be entitled to foreclose on all of the assets of
the Company pledged to the Bank, including on Franklin Holdings pledge of 70% of the stock of
FCMC.
The Legacy Credit Agreement is secured by a first priority security interest in (i) the REIT
Shares; (ii) the Participant Trust Certificates; (iii) an undivided 16.72039% interest in the
consumer mortgage loans and REO properties transferred to New Trust; (iv) 70% of all equity
interests in FCMC, and 100% equity interests in all other direct and indirect subsidiaries of
Franklin Holding, pledged by Franklin Holding (subject to partial releases of such equity interests
under Cumulative Collective Targets under the terms relating to the Servicing Agreement); (v) all
amounts owing pursuant to any deposit account or securities account of any Company entities bound
to the Legacy Credit Agreement (other than Franklin Holding), (vi) a first mortgage in real
property interests at 6 Harrison Street, Unit 6, New York, New York; (vii) all monies owing to any
borrower from any taxing authority; (viii) any commercial tort or other claim of FCMC, Holding, or
any borrower, including FCMCs right, title and interest in claims and actions with respect to
certain loan purchase agreements and other interactions of FCMC with various entities engaged in
the secondary mortgage market; (ix) certain real property interests of FCMC in respect to the
proprietary leases under the existing Forbearance Agreements if not transferred to New Trust; (x) a
second priority lien on cash collateral held as security for the Licensing Credit Agreement to
FCMC; and (xi) any monies, funds or sums due or received by any Borrower in respect of any program
sponsored by any Governmental Authority, any federal program, federal agency or quasi-governmental
agency, including without limitation any fees received, directly or indirectly, under the U.S.
Treasury Homeowners Affordability and Stability Plan. Any security agreement, acknowledgement
or other agreement in respect of a lien or encumbrance on any asset of New Trust shall be
non-recourse in nature and shall permit New Trust to distribute, without qualification, 83.27961%
of all net collections received by New Trust to the REIT Sub and its subsidiaries irrespective of
any event or condition in respect of the Legacy Credit Agreement.
30
All collections received by New Trust, provided that an event of default has not occurred and
is continuing, shall go first to the payment of monthly servicing fees, which shall be paid one
month in advance, under the Servicing Agreement and then to (i) Administration Fees, expenses and
costs (if any), (ii) pro rata to the owner trustee, certificate trustee and each custodian for any
due and unpaid fees and expenses of such trustee and/or custodian, and (iii) to the pro rata
ownership of the Trust Certificates. All amounts received pursuant to the Participants Trust
Certificates shall be distributed pursuant to the applicable Waterfall provisions.
3. |
|
Entered into an amended and restated credit agreement to fund FCMCs licensing obligations
and working capital. |
On March 31, 2009 in connection with the Restructuring, Franklin Holding and FCMC entered into
an Amended and Restated Credit Agreement (Licensing) (the Licensing Credit Agreement) which
included a credit limit of $13,500,000, composed of a secured (i) revolving line of credit
(Revolving Facility) up to the principal amount outstanding at any time of $2,000,000, (ii) up to
the aggregate stated amount outstanding at any time for letters of credit of $6,500,000, and (iii)
a draw credit facility (Draw Facility) up to the principal amount outstanding at any time of
$5,000,000.
On March 26, 2010, Franklin Holding and FCMC entered into an amendment to the Licensing Credit
Agreement with the Bank, which renewed and extended the Licensing Credit Agreement entered into
with the Bank on March 31, 2009 as part of the Restructuring. The Amendment reduces the draw
credit facility (Draw Facility) from $5.0 million to $4.0 million and extends the termination
date to May 31, 2010, and extends the termination date for the $2.0 million revolving line of
credit and $6.5 million letter of credit facilities to March 31, 2011. The amendment further
provides that FCMC shall, to the extent permitted by applicable law, no less frequently than
semi-annually, within forty-five days after each June 30th and December 31st of each calendar year,
make pro rata dividends, distributions and payments to FCMCs shareholders and the Bank under the
Legacy Credit Agreement. In accordance with the Legacy Credit Agreement, the Bank is currently
entitled to 70% of all amounts distributed by FCMC. The payment of any dividends, distributions
and payments to FCMCs shareholders and the Bank would result in a reduction of FCMCs
stockholders equity and cash available for its operations. All other material terms and
conditions of the Licensing Credit Agreement remain the same, including the collateral, warranties,
representations, covenants and events of defaults.
The Revolving Facility and the letters of credit are used to assure that all state licensing
requirements of FCMC are met and to pay approved expenses of the Company. The Draw Facility is
used to provide working capital of FCMC, if needed, and amounts drawn and repaid under this
facility cannot be re-borrowed. At March 31, 2010, $1,000,000 was outstanding under the revolving
facility and approximately $6.3 million of letters of credit for various state licensing purposes
were outstanding. There were no amounts due under the Draw Facility.
The principal sum shall be due and payable in full on the earlier of the date that the
advances under the Licensing Credit Agreement, as amended, are due and payable in full pursuant to
the terms of the agreement, whether by acceleration or otherwise, or at maturity. Advances under
the Revolving Facility shall bear interest at the one-month reserve adjusted LIBOR plus a margin of
8%. Advances under the Draw Facility shall bear interest at the one-month reserve adjusted LIBOR
plus a margin of 6%.
There is a requirement to make monthly payments of interest accrued on the Advances under the
Revolving Facility and the Draw Facility. After any default, all advances and letters of credit
shall bear interest at 5% in excess of the rate of interest then in effect.
31
The Licensing Credit Agreement, as amended, contains warranties, representations, covenants
and events of default that are customary in transactions similar to the restructuring.
The Licensing Credit Agreement, as amended, is secured by (i) a first priority security
interest in FCMCs cash equivalents in a controlled account maintained at the Bank in an amount
satisfactory to the Bank, but not less than $8,500,000, (ii) blanket existing lien on all personal
property of FCMC, (iii) a second mortgage in real property interests at 6 Harrison Street, Unit 6,
New York, New York, (iv) a first Mortgage in certain real property interests at 350 Albany Street,
New York, New York; and (v) any monies or sums due FCMC in respect of any program sponsored by any
Governmental Authority, including without limitation any fees received, directly or indirectly,
under the U.S. Treasury Homeowners Affordability and Stability Plan.
The Draw Facility is guaranteed by Thomas J. Axon, Chairman of the Board of Directors and a
principal stockholder of the Company. Mr. Axons Guaranty is secured by a first priority and
exclusive lien on commercial real estate. In consideration for his guaranty, the Bank and the
Companys Audit Committee each had consented in March 2009 to the payment to Mr. Axon equal to 10%
of FCMCs common shares, which has been paid, subject to a further payment of up to an additional
10% in FCMCs common shares should the pledge of common shares of FCMC by Franklin Holding to the
Bank be reduced upon attainment by FCMC of certain net collection targets set by the Bank with
respect to the Portfolio.
4. |
|
Entered into a servicing agreement with the New Trust. |
The servicing agreement (the Servicing Agreement) governs the servicing by FCMC, as the
servicer (the Servicer) of the Portfolio transferred to New Trust. New Trust and/or the Bank as
the administrator of New Trust (the Administrator) have significant control over all aspects of
the servicing of the Portfolio based on (i) a majority of the Servicers actions or Servicers
utilization of any subservicer or subcontractor is contingent on the Servicer receiving explicit
instructions or consent from New Trust or Administrator, (ii) compliance with work rules and an
approval matrix provided by the Bank and (iii) monthly meetings between New Trust and the Servicer.
All collections by the Servicer are remitted to a collection account and controlled through
the Banks lockbox account. The Administrator shall transfer the collection amounts from the
lockbox account to a certificate account whereby the funds shall flow through the trust agreements
Waterfall as described above. The Servicers servicing fees and servicing advance reimbursements
are paid in advance provided an event of default has not occurred. If an event of default has
occurred, the Servicers servicing fees and servicing advances are the third remittance in the
Waterfall, following remittances for payment of Administrator, custodian and trustee fees.
New Trusts indemnification obligation to the Servicer is limited to the collections from the
Portfolio. In addition, the Servicer will be indemnified by New Trust only for a breach of
corporate representations and warranties or if the Administrator forces the Servicer to take an
action that results in a loss to the Servicer.
32
The Servicer is required to maintain net worth of approximately $7.6 million and net income
before taxes of $800,000 for the most recent twelve-month period or an event of default will be
deemed to have occurred. In addition to typical servicer events of default and the defaults listed
above, the Servicing
Agreement contains the following events of default: (i) certain defaults under the Legacy Loan
Agreement would trigger an event of default under the Servicing Agreement, (ii) failure to adopt a
servicing action plan as directed by the Administrator would trigger an event of default, (iii) any
event of default under the Licensing Loan Agreement would trigger an event of default under the
Servicing Agreement, and (iv) failure of Servicer to satisfy certain gross collection targets if
determined to be the result of a failed servicing practice as determined by the Bank per a
servicing audit would trigger an event of default.
The Servicing Agreement shall have an initial term of three years which may be extended for
one or two additional one year periods at the sole discretion of New Trust. During the first year
of the agreement, Servicer shall receive a termination fee for each loan to the extent the
servicing is terminated by the Bank for any reason other than a default under the terms of the
servicing agreement. This provision of the termination fee expired effective March 31, 2010.
During the term of the servicing agreement, FCMC may not enter into any other third-party servicing
agreements to service any other assets that could reasonably likely impair its ability to service
the Portfolio without the consent of the Bank, which cannot be unreasonably withheld.
Forbearance Agreements with Lead Lending Bank
On December 28, 2007, the Company entered into a series of agreements with the Bank, pursuant
to which the Bank agreed to forbear with respect to certain defaults of the Company relating to the
Companys indebtedness to the Bank and restructure approximately $1.93 billion of such indebtedness
to the Bank and its participant banks. However, the Forbearance did not relate to $44.5 million of
the Companys indebtedness under the Master Credit and Security Agreement, dated as of October 13,
2004, as amended, by and among Franklin Credit, certain subsidiaries of Franklin Credit and the
Bank. This amount remained subject to the original terms specified in the applicable agreements
(the Unrestructured Debt). For a description of the principal terms of all the Companys credit
agreements, including The Forbearance Agreements (the Forbearance), in effect prior to entering
into the Restructure Agreements on March 31, 2009 described above, which replaced such Forbearance
Agreements, except for the Unrestructured Debt, please see the Companys Form 10-K for the year
2009.
The Franklin forbearance agreement, however, remains in effect until June 30, 2010, but only
with respect to the Companys remaining Unrestructured Debt that was not restructured effective
March 31, 2009 under the Restructuring Agreements, which was approximately $39.1 million at March
31, 2010.
The Unrestructured Debt remains subject to the original terms of the Franklin forbearance
agreement entered into with the Bank in December 2007 and subsequent amendments thereto (the
Franklin Forbearance Agreement) and the Franklin 2004 master credit agreement. On April 20,
August 10, November 13, 2009 and March 26, 2010, Franklin Holding, and certain of its direct and
indirect subsidiaries, including FCMC and Franklin Credit Asset Corporation (Franklin Asset)
entered into amendments to the Franklin Forbearance Agreement and Franklin 2004 master credit
agreement (the Amendments) with the Bank relating to the Unrestructured Debt whereby the term of
forbearance period, which had been previously extended by the Bank, was extended until June 30,
2010. The Bank again agreed to forebear with respect to any defaults past or present with respect
to any failure to make scheduled principal and interest payments to the Bank (Identified
Forbearance Default) relating to the Unrestructured Debt. During the forbearance period, the
Bank, absent the occurrence and continuance of a forbearance default other than an Identified
Forbearance Default, will not initiate collection proceedings or exercise its remedies in respect
of the Unrestructured Debt or elect to have interest accrue at the stated rate applicable after
default. In addition, FCMC is not obligated to the Bank with respect to the
Unrestructured Debt and any references to FCMC in the Franklin 2004 master credit agreement
governing the Unrestructured Debt have been amended to refer to Franklin Asset.
33
Upon expiration of the forbearance period, in the event that the Unrestructured Debt with the
Bank remains outstanding, the Bank, with notice, could call an event of default under the Legacy
Credit Agreement, but not the Licensing Credit Agreement and the Servicing Agreement, which do not
include cross-default provisions that would be triggered by such an event of default under the
Legacy Credit Agreement. The Banks recourse in respect of the Legacy Credit Agreement is limited
to the assets and stock of Franklin Holdings subsidiaries, excluding the assets of FCMC (except
for a first lien of the Bank on an office condominium unit and a second priority lien of the Bank
on cash collateral held as security under the Licensing Credit Agreement) and the unpledged portion
of FCMCs stock.
The Franklin Forbearance Agreement is subject to a scheduled maturity date of June 30, 2010.
8. NONCONTROLLING INTEREST
For the Companys consolidated majority-owned subsidiary in which the Company owns less than
100% of the total outstanding common shares of stock (FCMC), the Company recognizes a
noncontrolling interest for the ownership interest of the noncontrolling interest holder, the
Companys President and Chairman, and principal stockholder, Thomas J. Axon. The noncontrolling
interest represents the minority stockholders proportionate share of the equity of FCMC. At March
31, 2010, the Company owned 90% of FCMCs capital stock, and Mr. Axon owned 10%. The 10% equity
interest of FCMC that is not owned by the Company is shown as noncontrolling interest in subsidiary
in the Companys consolidated financial statements.
The change in the carrying amount of the minority interest for the three months ended March
31, 2010 is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, 2010 |
|
Balance, January 1, 2010 |
|
$ |
1,657,275 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributed to noncontrolling interest |
|
|
65,331 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, March 31, 2010 |
|
$ |
1,722,606 |
|
|
|
|
|
On March 31, 2009, the Company transferred ten percent of its ownership in common stock
of FCMC to its Chairman and President, Thomas J. Axon, as the cost of obtaining certain guarantees
and pledges from Mr. Axon, which were required by the Bank as a condition of the restructuring
entered into by the Company and certain of its wholly-owned direct and indirect subsidiaries on
March 31, 2009. Mr. Axon is also entitled to a grant of up to an additional ten percent of the
common stock of FCMC from the Company should the pledge of common shares of FCMC by the Company to
the Bank, as part of the restructuring, be reduced upon the attainment by FCMC of certain net
collection targets set by the Bank. See Note 7 Notes Payable and Financing Agreements.
34
9. CERTAIN CONCENTRATIONS
Third Party Servicing Agreements As a result of the March 2009 Restructuring and
the Reorganization that took effect December 19, 2008, FCMC, the Companys operating business is
conducted principally through FCMC, which is a specialty consumer finance company primarily engaged
in the servicing and resolution of performing, reperforming and nonperforming residential mortgage
loans, including specialized loan recovery servicing, for third parties. The portfolios serviced
for other entities, as of March 31, 2010, were heavily concentrated with loans serviced for
Huntington (loans previously acquired and originated by Franklin and transferred to the Trust). As
of March 31, 2010, FCMC had two significant servicing contracts with third parties to service 1-4
family mortgage loans and owned real estate, one with Huntington and the other with Bosco, a
related party. At March 31, 2010, we serviced and provided recovery collection services on a total
population of approximately 35,000 loans for Huntington and Bosco, and relatively small pools of
loans under recovery collection contracts, whereby we receive fees based solely on a percentage of
amounts collected, for several other entities. The unpaid principal balance of loans serviced for
Huntington represented approximately 78% of the total loans serviced for third parties at March 31,
2010.
Additionally, under the terms of the servicing agreement with the Bank, the Bank has the right
since March 31, 2010 to replace FCMC as servicer for any reason and to sell, on a servicing
released basis without an assignment of the Servicing Agreement, the assets we transferred to the
Trust, without cause and without penalty with not less than 90 days prior written notice.
Financing All of the Companys existing debt is with one financial institution, Huntington.
10. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
Restructuring On March 31, 2009, the Company transferred ten percent of its ownership in
common stock of FCMC to its Chairman and President, Thomas J. Axon, as the cost of obtaining
certain guarantees and pledges from Mr. Axon, which were required by the Bank as a condition of the
restructuring entered into by the Company and certain of its wholly-owned direct and indirect
subsidiaries on March 31, 2009. Mr. Axon is also entitled to a grant of up to an additional ten
percent of the common stock of FCMC from the Company should the pledge of common shares of FCMC by
the Company to the Bank, as part of the restructuring, be reduced upon the attainment by FCMC of
certain net collection targets set by the Bank. See Note 7 Notes Payable and Financing
Agreements.
Bosco Servicing Agreement On May 28, 2008, FCMC entered into various agreements, including a
servicing agreement, to service on a fee-paying basis for Bosco approximately $245 million in
residential home equity line of credit mortgage loans. Bosco was organized by FCMC, and the
membership interests in Bosco include the Companys Chairman and President, Thomas J. Axon, and a
related company of which Mr. Axon is the chairman of the board and three of the Companys directors
serve as board members of that entity. The loans that are subject to the servicing agreement were
acquired by Bosco on May 28, 2008, and the Bank is the administrative agent for the lenders to
Bosco. FCMC also provided the loan analysis, due diligence and other services for Bosco on a
fee-paying basis for the loans acquired by Bosco. FCMCs servicing agreement was approved by its
Audit Committee.
FCMC began servicing the Bosco portfolio in June 2008. Included in the Companys consolidated
revenues were servicing fees recognized from servicing the Bosco portfolio of $244,000 and $636,000
for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively. In addition, included in the
Companys consolidated revenues were fees recognized for various administrative services provided
to Bosco by FCMC in the amount of $90,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2009. The Company
did not recognize any administrative fees for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and Bosco did
not
pay for any fees for such services provided during the first quarter of 2010. In June 2009,
FCMC wrote off as uncollectible the administrative fees recognized in the three months ended March
31, 2009.
35
On February 27, 2009, at the request of the Bosco Lenders, FCMC adopted a revised fee
structure, which was approved by FCMCs Audit Committee. The revised fee structure provided that,
for the next 12 months, FCMCs monthly servicing fee would be paid only after a monthly loan
modification fee of $29,167 was paid to Boscos Lenders. Further, the revised fee structure
provided that, on each monthly payment date, if the aggregate amount of net collections was less
than $1 million, 25% of FCMCs servicing fee would be paid only after certain other monthly
distributions were made, including, among other things, payments made by Bosco to repay its
third-party indebtedness.
On October 29, 2009, at the additional request of the Bosco Lenders in an effort to maximize
cash flow to the Bosco Lenders and to avoid payment defaults by Bosco, the revised fee structure
relating to deferred fees was adjusted through an amendment to the loan servicing agreement with
Bosco (the Bosco Amendment), which was approved by FCMCs Audit Committee.
Under the terms of the Bosco Amendment, FCMC is entitled to a minimum monthly servicing fee of
$50,000. However, to the extent that the servicing fee otherwise paid for any month would be in
excess of the greater of $50,000 or 10% of the total cash collected on the loans serviced for Bosco
(such amount being the Monthly Cap), the excess will be deferred, without the accrual of
interest. The cumulative amounts deferred will be paid (i) with the payment of the monthly
servicing fee, to the maximum extent possible, for any month in which the servicing fee is less
than the applicable Monthly Cap, so long as the sum paid does not exceed the Monthly Cap or (ii) to
the extent not previously paid, on the date on which any of the promissory notes (Notes) payable
by Bosco to the Lenders, which were entered into to finance the purchase of and are secured by the
loans serviced by FCMC, is repaid, refinanced, released, accelerated, or the amounts owing
thereunder increased (other than by accrual or capitalization of interest). If the deferred
servicing fees become payable by reason of acceleration of the Notes, the Lenders right to payment
under such Notes shall be prior in right to FCMCs rights to such deferred fees.
Further, the Bosco Amendment provides that FCMC will not perform or be required to perform any
field contact services for Bosco or make any servicing advances on behalf of Bosco that
individually or in the aggregate would result in a cost or expense to Bosco of more than $10,000
per month, without the prior written consent and approval of the Lenders. The Bosco Amendment did
not alter FCMCs right to receive a certain percentage of collections after Boscos indebtedness to
the Lenders has been repaid in full, the Bosco equity holders have been repaid in full the equity
investment in Bosco made prior to Bosco entering into the loan agreement with the Lenders, and the
Lenders and Boscos equity holders have received a specified rate of return on their debt and
equity investments.
The amount and timing of ancillary fees owed to the Company is the subject of a good faith
dispute between FCMC and the Managing Member of Bosco, Thomas J. Axon (Chairman and President of
the Company and FCMC). However, even if the parties can resolve their difference amicably, there
are no funds available to Bosco for payment for such services, since all funds from collections are
required by Boscos agreements with its lenders to repay such lenders, aside from specific amounts
required for servicing fees and other specifically excepted costs. On June 30, 2009, the Company
wrote off $90,000 in internal accounting costs associated with services provided by FCMC to Bosco.
On December 31, 2009, the Company wrote off $372,000 in additional aged receivables, due to
non-payment, consisting of (i) legal costs incurred by FCMC in 2008 related to the acquisition by
Bosco of its loan portfolio and entry into a servicing agreement with Bosco; (ii) expenses for loan
analysis, due diligence and other services performed for Bosco by FCMC in 2008 related to the
acquisition by Bosco of the loan portfolio; and (iii) additional internal accounting costs for
services provided to Bosco by FCMC
through June 30, 2009. In addition, FCMC has not accrued fees for accounting costs for these
services since June 1, 2009, and such costs are estimated to be approximately $24,000 for the three
months ended March 31, 2010.
36
FCMC determined to accept the deferrals and other amendments described above with respect to
its Bosco relationship in recognition of the performance of the Bosco loan portfolio, which has
been adversely impacted by general market and economic conditions, in an effort to maintain the
continued and future viability of its servicing relationship with Bosco, and in the belief that
doing so is in its best long-term economic interests in light of the fact that the Company believes
FCMCs servicing of the Bosco portfolio is profitable notwithstanding such deferrals and
amendments. FCMCs determination to not currently take legal action with respect to the
receivables it has written off as described above, which receivables have not been settled or
forgiven by FCMC, was made in light of these same considerations.
As of March 31, 2010, FCMC, had $386,000 of accrued and unpaid servicing fees due from Bosco
(effective August 1, 2009, FCMCs servicing fee income is recognized when cash is received), and
$18,000 of reimbursable third-party expenses incurred by FCMC in the servicing and collection of
the Bosco loans.
On March 4, 2010, FCMC entered into an agreement with Bosco to provide ancillary services not
covered by the Servicing Agreement related to occupancy verification and the coordination of
on-sight visits with borrowers to facilitate the implementation of loss mitigation program
initiatives at fees ranging from $100-$140 per individual assignment. FCMC had performed such
services for Bosco on a trial basis under a pass-through cost arrangement, with total expenses
reimbursable by Bosco of approximately $10,000 outstanding at March 31, 2010 (included in the
$18,000 of reimbursable third-party expenses included above).
Other Significant Related Party Transactions with the Companys Chairman At March 31, 2010,
the Company had an outstanding receivable from an affiliate, RMTS Associates, of $8,000. This
receivable represents various operating expenses that are paid by the Company and then reimbursed
by RMTS.
On August 18, 2008, FCMCs audit committee authorized a 5% commission to Hudson Servicing
Solutions, LLC (Hudson), a procurer of force-placed insurance products for the mortgage industry,
with respect to force-placed hazard insurance coverage maintained on FCMCs remaining portfolio of
mortgage loans and mortgage loans serviced for third parties. The sole member of Hudson is RMTS,
LLC, of which the Companys Chairman and President is the majority owner.
37
FCMC entered into a collection services agreement, effective December 23, 2009, pursuant to
which FCMC agreed to serve as collection agent in the customary manner in connection with
approximately 4,000 seriously delinquent and generally unsecured loans, with an unpaid principal
balance of approximately $56 million, which were acquired by two trusts set up by a fund in which
the Companys Chairman and President is a member, and contributed 50% of the purchase price and
agreed to pay certain fund expenses. Under the collection services agreement, FCMC is entitled to
collection fees consisting of 35% of the gross amount collected. The agreement also provides for
reimbursement of third-party fees and expenses incurred by FCMC as provided for in this collection
services agreement. The collection fees earned by FCMC under this collection services agreement
during the three months ended March 31, 2010 were not significant.
On February 1, 2010, FCMC entered into a collection services agreement, pursuant to which FCMC
agreed to serve as collection agent in the customary manner in connection with approximately 1,500
seriously delinquent and generally unsecured loans, with an unpaid principal balance of
approximately $85 million, which were acquired through a trust set up by a fund in which the
Companys Chairman and President is a member, and contributed twenty five percent of the purchase
price. Under the collection services agreement, FCMC is entitled to collection fees consisting of
33% of the amount collected, net of third-party expenses. The agreement also provides for
reimbursement of third-party fees and expenses incurred by FCMC in compliance with the collection
services agreement. The collection fees earned by FCMC under this collection services agreement
during the three months ended March 31, 2010 were not significant.
38
|
|
|
ITEM 2. |
|
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS |
General
Safe Harbor Statements. Statements contained herein and elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q that are not historical fact may be forward-looking statements regarding the business,
operations and financial condition of Franklin Credit Holding Corporation (Franklin Holding, and
together with its consolidated subsidiaries, the Company, Franklin, we, us or our unless
otherwise specified or the context otherwise requires) within the meaning of Section 27A of the
Securities Act of 1933, as amended and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended (the Exchange Act). This information may involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties
and other factors which may cause our actual results, performance or achievements to be materially
different from our future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by any
forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements, which involve assumptions and describe our
future plans, strategies and expectations, and other statements that are not historical facts, are
generally identifiable by use of the words may, will, should, expect, anticipate,
estimate, believe, intend, plan, potential or project or the negative of these words or
other variations on these words or comparable terminology. These forward-looking statements are
based on assumptions that may be incorrect, and there can be no assurance that these projections
included in these forward-looking statements will come to pass. Our actual results could differ
materially from those expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements as a result of various
factors. These factors include, but are not limited to: (i) unanticipated changes in the U.S.
economy, including changes in business conditions such as interest rates, changes in the level of
growth in the finance and housing markets, such as slower or negative home price appreciation and
economic downturns or other adverse events in certain states; (ii) the Companys ability to
continue as a going concern; (iii) the Companys relations with the Companys lenders and such
lenders willingness to waive any defaults under the Companys agreements with such lenders; (iv)
the Companys ability to obtain renewals of its loans or alternative refinancing opportunities; (v)
increases in the delinquency rates of the Companys borrowers, (vi) the availability of third
parties holding subprime mortgage debt for servicing by the Company on a fee-paying basis; (vii)
changes in the statutes or regulations applicable to the Companys business or in the
interpretation and enforcement thereof by the relevant authorities; (viii) the status of the
Companys regulatory compliance; (ix) our ability to meet collection targets under the Legacy
Credit Agreement in order to reduce the pledge of equity interest in FCMC from 70% to a minimum of
25%; (x) the risk that legal proceedings could be brought against the Company which could
adversely affect its financial results; (xi) the Companys ability to adapt to and implement
technological change; (xii) the Companys ability to attract and retain qualified employees; and
(xiii) other risks detailed from time to time in the Companys Securities and Exchange Commission
(SEC) reports and filings. Additional factors that would cause actual results to differ
materially from those projected or suggested in any forward-looking statements are contained in the
Companys filings with the SEC, including, but not limited to, those factors discussed under the
captions Risk Factors, Interest Rate Risk and Real Estate Risk in the Companys Annual Report
on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009, filed with the SEC on March 31, 2010 and, if
applicable, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, which the Company urges investors to consider. The
Company undertakes no obligation to publicly release the revisions to such forward-looking
statements that may be made to reflect events or circumstances after the date hereof or to reflect
the occurrences of unanticipated events, except as otherwise required by securities, and other
applicable laws. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking
statements, which speak only as of the date hereof. The Company undertakes no obligation to
release publicly the results on any events or circumstances after the date hereof or to reflect the
occurrence of unanticipated events.
39
Application of Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
The Companys significant accounting policies, as of December 31, 2009 are described in Note 2
to the December 31, 2009 consolidated financial statements filed on the Annual Report on Form 10-K.
As of March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, we have identified the continuing assessment of the
fair value of the investment in (i) preferred and common stocks, or the REIT Securities, (ii) trust
certificates, (iii) because for accounting purposes the Restructuring is being treated as a
financing under ASC Topic 860, Transfers and Servicing (ASC Topic 860), mortgage loans and real
estate held for sale and the corresponding nonrecourse liability, and (iv) income taxes as the
Companys most critical accounting policies and estimates. The following discussion and analysis
of financial condition and results of operations is based on the amounts reported in our
consolidated financial statements, which are prepared in accordance with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America, or GAAP. In preparing the consolidated
financial statements, management is required to make various judgments, estimates and assumptions
that affect the financial statements and disclosures. Changes in these estimates and assumptions
could have a material effect on our consolidated financial statements. Management believes that
the estimates and judgments used in preparing these consolidated financial statements were the most
appropriate at that time.
Serviced for Others Portfolio
As a result of the March 2009 Restructuring and the Reorganization that took effect December
19, 2008, FCMC, the Companys servicing business is conducted through FCMC, a specialty consumer
finance company primarily engaged in the servicing and resolution of performing, reperforming and
nonperforming residential mortgage loans, including specialized loan recovery servicing for third
parties.
As of March 31, 2010, FCMC had two significant servicing contracts with third parties to
service 1-4 family mortgage loans and owned real estate, Huntington and Bosco. The portfolios
serviced for Huntington (loans previously acquired and originated by Franklin and transferred to
the Trust) primarily consist of first and second-lien loans secured by 1-4 family residential real
estate that generally fell outside the underwriting standards of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. At
March 31, 2010, we serviced and provided recovery collection services on a total population of
approximately 35,000 loans for Huntington and Bosco, and relatively small pools of loans under
recovery collection contracts, whereby we receive fees based solely on a percentage of amounts
collected, for a few other entities. The loans serviced for Huntington represented approximately
78% of the total loans serviced at March 31, 2010.
On May 28, 2008, FCMC entered into a servicing agreement to service for Bosco on a fee-paying
basis approximately $245 million in residential home equity line of credit mortgage loans. Bosco
was organized by FCMC, and the membership interests in Bosco include the Companys Chairman and
President, Thomas J. Axon, and a related company of which Mr. Axon is the chairman of the board and
three of the Companys directors serve as board members of that entity. The loans that are subject
to the servicing agreement were acquired by Bosco from an unrelated third party.
40
At March 31, 2010, the portfolio of residential mortgage loans serviced for other entities
consisted of 35,000 loans representing $1.88 billion of unpaid principal balance (UPB). The
following table sets forth information regarding the types of properties securing the serviced for
others portfolio at March 31, 2010.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
Number |
|
|
Unpaid |
|
|
Percentage of Total |
|
Property Types |
|
of Loans |
|
|
Principal Balance |
|
|
Principal Balance |
|
Residential 1-4 family |
|
|
20,551 |
|
|
$ |
1,329,850,377 |
|
|
|
70.87 |
% |
Condos, co-ops, PUD dwellings |
|
|
3,382 |
|
|
|
206,441,685 |
|
|
|
11.00 |
% |
Manufactured and mobile homes |
|
|
501 |
|
|
|
14,325,925 |
|
|
|
0.76 |
% |
Secured, property type unknown(1) |
|
|
1,437 |
|
|
|
23,230,123 |
|
|
|
1.24 |
% |
Commercial |
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
3,276,711 |
|
|
|
0.17 |
% |
Unsecured loans(2) |
|
|
8,913 |
|
|
|
299,239,555 |
|
|
|
15.96 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
34,823 |
|
|
$ |
1,876,364,376 |
|
|
|
100.00 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The loans included in this category are principally small balance (less than $10,000)
second-lien loans acquired, and are collateralized by residential real estate. |
|
(2) |
|
The loans included in this category are principally second-lien loans where the Company
is aware that residential real estate collateral has been foreclosed by the first-lien
holder. |
41
The following table provides a breakdown of the delinquency status of our portfolio of
residential mortgage loans serviced for other entities, as of March 31, 2010, by unpaid principal
balance.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
Contractual Delinquency |
|
|
|
Days Past Due |
|
Amount |
|
|
% |
|
Performing Current |
|
0 - 30 days |
|
$ |
246,586,028 |
|
|
|
13.14 |
% |
Delinquent |
|
31 - 60 days |
|
|
16,303,578 |
|
|
|
0.87 |
% |
|
|
61 - 90 days |
|
|
12,196,274 |
|
|
|
0.65 |
% |
|
|
90+ days |
|
|
786,247,887 |
|
|
|
41.90 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Modified Loans |
|
0 - 30 days |
|
|
220,008,602 |
|
|
|
11.73 |
% |
Delinquent |
|
31 - 60 days |
|
|
35,388,050 |
|
|
|
1.89 |
% |
|
|
61 - 90 days |
|
|
21,852,940 |
|
|
|
1.16 |
% |
|
|
90+ days |
|
|
69,046,982 |
|
|
|
3.68 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bankruptcy |
|
0 - 30 days |
|
|
32,095,079 |
|
|
|
1.71 |
% |
Delinquent |
|
31 - 60 days |
|
|
3,167,831 |
|
|
|
0.17 |
% |
|
|
61 - 90 days |
|
|
3,625,113 |
|
|
|
0.19 |
% |
|
|
90+ days |
|
|
152,803,828 |
|
|
|
8.14 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreclosure |
|
0 - 30 days |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Delinquent |
|
31 - 60 days |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
61 - 90 days |
|
|
659,259 |
|
|
|
0.04 |
% |
|
|
90+ days |
|
|
276,382,925 |
|
|
|
14.73 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
1,876,364,376 |
|
|
|
100.00 |
% |
All current loans |
|
0 - 30 days |
|
$ |
498,689,709 |
|
|
|
26.58 |
% |
Included in the above table were second-lien mortgage loans in the amount of $1.2
billion, of which $259.6 million were current on a contractual basis. The legal status composition
of the second-lien mortgage loans at March 31, 2010 was: $896 million (including $711.0 million at
least 90 days contractually delinquent), or 78%, were performing; $125.8 million, or 11%, were
modified due to delinquency or the borrowers financial difficulty; $137.1 million, or 12%, were in
bankruptcy; and less than $1 million were in foreclosure.
42
The following table provides a breakdown of the delinquency status of our portfolio of
residential mortgage loans serviced for other entities, as of March 31, 2010, by loan count.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
Contractual Delinquency |
|
|
|
Days Past Due |
|
Number of Loans |
|
|
% |
|
Performing Current |
|
0 - 30 days |
|
|
5,933 |
|
|
|
17.04 |
% |
Delinquent |
|
31 - 60 days |
|
|
377 |
|
|
|
1.08 |
% |
|
|
61 - 90 days |
|
|
276 |
|
|
|
0.79 |
% |
|
|
90+ days |
|
|
18,803 |
|
|
|
54.00 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Modified Loans |
|
0 - 30 days |
|
|
2,689 |
|
|
|
7.72 |
% |
Delinquent |
|
31 - 60 days |
|
|
356 |
|
|
|
1.02 |
% |
|
|
61 - 90 days |
|
|
205 |
|
|
|
0.59 |
% |
|
|
90+ days |
|
|
911 |
|
|
|
2.62 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bankruptcy |
|
0 - 30 days |
|
|
763 |
|
|
|
2.19 |
% |
Delinquent |
|
31 - 60 days |
|
|
87 |
|
|
|
0.25 |
% |
|
|
61 - 90 days |
|
|
87 |
|
|
|
0.25 |
% |
|
|
90+ days |
|
|
3,024 |
|
|
|
8.69 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreclosure |
|
0 - 30 days |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Delinquent |
|
31 - 60 days |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
61 - 90 days |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
0.01 |
% |
|
|
90+ days |
|
|
1,307 |
|
|
|
3.75 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
34,823 |
|
|
|
100.00 |
% |
All current loans |
|
0 - 30 days |
|
|
9,385 |
|
|
|
26.95 |
% |
Included in the above table were 28,184 second-lien mortgage loans, of which 7,301 were
current on a contractual basis. The legal status composition of the second-lien mortgage loans at
March 31, 2010 was: 21,994 loans (including 16,472 loans at least 90 days contractually
delinquent), or 78%, were performing; 2,737 loans, or 10%, were modified due to delinquency or the
borrowers financial difficulty; 3,444 loans, or 12%, were in bankruptcy; and 9 loans were in
foreclosure.
The following table sets forth information regarding the lien position of the properties
securing the portfolio of residential mortgage loans (exclusive of real estate assets) serviced for
other entities at March 31, 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
Number |
|
|
Unpaid |
|
|
Percentage of Total |
|
Lien Position |
|
of Loans |
|
|
Principal Balance |
|
|
Principal Balance |
|
1st Liens |
|
|
6,639 |
|
|
$ |
716,398,083 |
|
|
|
38.18 |
% |
2nd Liens |
|
|
28,184 |
|
|
|
1,159,966,293 |
|
|
|
61.82 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
34,823 |
|
|
$ |
1,876,364,376 |
|
|
|
100.00 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
43
The following table sets forth information regarding the geographic location of
properties securing the residential mortgage loans serviced for others at March 31, 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
Number |
|
|
Unpaid |
|
|
Percentage of Total |
|
Location |
|
of Loans |
|
|
Principal Balance |
|
|
Principal Balance |
|
California |
|
|
5,649 |
|
|
$ |
480,958,309 |
|
|
|
25.63 |
% |
New York |
|
|
1,471 |
|
|
|
166,975,834 |
|
|
|
8.90 |
% |
Florida |
|
|
2,785 |
|
|
|
149,404,783 |
|
|
|
7.96 |
% |
New Jersey |
|
|
931 |
|
|
|
131,186,696 |
|
|
|
6.99 |
% |
Texas |
|
|
3,354 |
|
|
|
90,823,601 |
|
|
|
4.84 |
% |
Pennsylvania |
|
|
1,165 |
|
|
|
64,868,196 |
|
|
|
3.46 |
% |
Ohio |
|
|
1,892 |
|
|
|
61,984,803 |
|
|
|
3.30 |
% |
Illinois |
|
|
1,299 |
|
|
|
54,480,552 |
|
|
|
2.90 |
% |
Michigan |
|
|
1,786 |
|
|
|
52,333,113 |
|
|
|
2.79 |
% |
Georgia |
|
|
1,293 |
|
|
|
51,681,483 |
|
|
|
2.75 |
% |
All Others |
|
|
13,198 |
|
|
|
571,667,006 |
|
|
|
30.48 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
34,823 |
|
|
$ |
1,876,364,376 |
|
|
|
100.00 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real Estate Assets Serviced for Others
The following table sets forth the real estate assets serviced for other entities, and sales
of real estate assets during the three months ended March 31, 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
Number of Assets |
|
|
Amount |
|
Real estate assets at March 31, 2010 |
|
|
227 |
|
|
$ |
44,453,028 |
|
Real estate assets sold |
|
|
65 |
|
|
$ |
10,427,195 |
|
Results of Operations Franklin Credit Management Corporation (FCMC)
Through FCMC, we are actively seeking to (a) expand our servicing operations to provide
servicing and collection services to third parties, particularly specialized collection services,
and (b) capitalize on our experience to provide customized, comprehensive loan analysis and
in-depth end-to-end transaction and portfolio management services to the residential mortgage
markets. Since January 1, 2009, the Companys operating business has been conducted principally
through FCMC, a specialty consumer finance subsidiary company primarily engaged in the servicing
and resolution of performing, reperforming and nonperforming residential mortgage loans, including
specialized loan recovery servicing, and in the due diligence, analysis, pricing and acquisition of
residential mortgage portfolios, for third parties. Some of these services include, in addition to
servicing loans for others, performing 1-4 family residential portfolio stratification and
analysis, pricing, due diligence, closing, and collateral transfer. These new business activities
are subject to the consent of the Bank, and we may not be successful in entering into or
implementing any of these businesses in a meaningful way. See Note 7 Notes Payable and
Financing Agreements Restructuring Agreements with Lead Lending Bank.
The entities for whom the Company serviced residential mortgage loan portfolios, as of March
31, 2010, principally included Huntington (first and second-lien loans secured by 1-4 family
residential real estate previously acquired and originated by Franklin and transferred to the
Trust) and Bosco. The Companys consolidated financial statements, while including the results of
FCMC, include the results of
all its subsidiary companies, which includes all the assets and debt obligations that have
resulted from Franklins legacy business prior to the March 31, 2009 Restructuring.
44
As a result of the March 2009 Restructuring and the corporate reorganization that took effect
December 19, 2008, FCMC, the Companys servicing entity within the Franklin group of companies,
notwithstanding the substantial stockholders deficit of Franklin, has positive net worth and 30%
of its equity free from the pledges to the Bank. The Restructuring provided for the release of
thirty percent of the equity in FCMC, ten percent of which has been transferred to the Companys
principal stockholder, Thomas J. Axon, from the Companys pledges to the Bank in respect of its
Legacy Credit Agreement.
At March 31, 2010, FCMC had total assets of $26.0 million and had stockholders equity of
$19.9 million. At December 31, 2009, FCMCs total assets amounted to $26.3 million and its
stockholders equity was $18.9 million. Inter-company payables and receivables were eliminated in
deriving the Consolidated Financial Statements of Franklin. FCMC had income before tax of
approximately $1.1 million and $1.4 million, respectively, for the three months ended March 31,
2010 and 2009, principally from servicing the portfolio of loans and assets for the Bank and Bosco.
Inter-company servicing revenues allocated to FCMC during the first quarter of 2009 were based
principally on the servicing contract entered into as part of the Restructuring, which became
effective on March 31, 2009. FCMC charges its sister companies a management fee that is estimated
based on internal services rendered by its employees to those companies. Inter-company
allocations, the Federal provision for income taxes, and cash servicing revenues received from the
Bank for servicing its loans during the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009 have been
eliminated in deriving the Consolidated Financial Statements of Franklin. Servicing revenues were
eliminated in the Consolidated Financial Statements of Franklin due to the accounting treatment for
the transfer of the trust certificates as a financing under ASC Topic 860.
As of March 31, 2010, FCMC had two significant servicing contracts with third parties to
service 1-4 family mortgage loans and owned real estate, Huntington and Bosco. At March 31, 2010,
we serviced and provided recovery collection services on a total population of approximately 35,000
loans for Huntington and Bosco, and relatively small pools of loans under recovery collection
contracts, whereby we receive fees based solely on a percentage of amounts collected, for a few
other entities. While the loans serviced for Huntington represented approximately 78% of the total
loans serviced for third parties at March 31, 2010, the servicing revenues earned from servicing
the Huntington portfolio represented approximately 94% of the total servicing revenues earned
during the three-months ended March 31, 2010.
The Legacy Credit Agreement requires that each dividend by FCMC to its stockholders be
accompanied by payment of a distribution to the Bank of an amount such that the Bank receives 70%
of the combined amounts paid by FCMC. While FCMC is not a borrower under the Legacy Credit
Agreement or otherwise liable for the indebtedness thereunder it has pledged certain collateral in
support of the Legacy Credit Agreement, and a default under the Legacy Credit Agreement could
result in the Banks foreclosure on the assets and stock of Franklin Holdings subsidiaries,
excluding the assets of FCMC (other than an office condominium unit held by FCMC and certain cash
collateral which also serves as security under the Licensing Credit Agreement) and the unpledged
portion of FCMCs stock.
At the request of the Bank, FCMC made a distribution of $2,245,000 to the Bank on September
30, 2009. The distribution, which represented approximately 70% of the estimated net income of
FCMC for the six months ended September 30, 2009 after a holdback of $500,000, was made in
accordance with the provisions of the Legacy Credit Agreement currently entitling the Bank to 70%
of all amounts distributed by FCMC. The distribution was principally applied by the Bank to pay
down the debt obligations of certain of FCMCs sister companies as provided for by the terms of the
Legacy Credit
Agreement with the Bank. The remaining 30%, or $962,000, was distributed in November 2009 as
a dividend of $9,623.38 per share to the stockholders of FCMC, including $866,000 to FCHC in
respect of its ownership of 90% of the outstanding stock of FCMC, and $96,000 to Thomas J. Axon,
the Chairman and President of the Company, in respect of his ownership of 10% of the outstanding
stock of FCMC.
45
The Restructuring provided for the release of thirty percent of the equity in FCMC, ten
percent of which has been transferred to the Companys principal stockholder, Thomas J. Axon, from
the Companys pledges to the Bank in respect of its Legacy Credit Agreement. The Legacy Credit
Agreement also provides for the possibility of release of up to an additional fifty percent (which,
as of March 31, 2010, is now forty-five percent due to the failure to achieve the first collection
target identified in the agreement, and of which a maximum of an additional ten percent would go to
Thomas J. Axon), based upon the Banks receipt of the agreed amounts of net remittances from the
Portfolio, summarized below (the Net Remittances), from March 31, 2009, the effective date of the
Legacy Credit Agreement (the Legacy Effective Date), through the term of the Legacy Credit
Agreement pursuant to and in accordance with the schedule of collection levels identified in the
Legacy Credit Agreement.
During the twelve-month period ending March 31, 2010, the minimum amount of Net Remittances,
referred to as Level 1, to achieve the release of an additional 10% of pledged equity interests,
from 70% to 60%, was $225 million. During the twelve months ended March 31, 2010, the Company
collected in aggregate approximately $203.6 million from loans and real estate owned serviced for
the Bank, of which $30.6 million was received from contractual loan purchase rights. Net
Remittances, as defined in the Legacy Credit Agreement essentially as collections less expenses
incurred by the Bank related to the Companys servicing of the Banks loans and real estate owned,
amounted to approximately $147.4 million. Therefore, the Company did not reach the minimum Level 1
amount of Net Remittances under the Restructuring Agreements by a deficiency of $77.6 million.
If Net Remittances reach the minimum Level 2 amount of $475 million prior to the third
anniversary date, the Bank will retain, as collateral, 55% of the FCMC equity instead of 50%, as
originally scheduled, and any subsequent reductions in the amount of FCMC equity pledged to the
Bank will be 10%; and provided further that if Net Remittances do not reach the minimum Level 2
amount prior to the third anniversary date, then the schedule for release of the equity interests
in FCMC currently pledged to the Bank will be as follows: (x) upon attaining the minimum Level 3
amount of $575 million, the pledged equity interests in FCMC will reduce 25% (from 70% to 45%); (y)
upon attaining the minimum Level 4 amount of $650 million, the pledged equity interests in FCMC
will reduce an additional 10% (from 45% to 35%), and (z) upon attaining the minimum Level 5 amount
of $750 million, the pledged equity interests in FCMC will reduce an additional 10% (from 35% to
25%). See Note 7 Notes Payable and Financing Agreements Forbearance Agreements with Lead
Lending Bank.
On March 26, 2010, the Company entered into an amendment to the Licensing Credit Agreement
with the Bank, which renewed and extended the Licensing Credit Agreement. The amendment includes a
reduction of the draw credit facility (Draw Facility) from $5.0 million to $4.0 million and an
extension of the expiration date to May 31, 2010 for the Draw Facility and to March 31, 2011 for
the $2.0 million revolving line of credit and $6.5 million letter of credit facilities. The
amendment further provides that FCMC shall, to the extent permitted by applicable law, no less
frequently than semi-annually, within forty-five days after each June 30th and December
31st of each calendar year, make pro rata dividends, distributions and payments to FCMCs
shareholders and the Bank under the Legacy Credit Agreement. In accordance with the
Legacy Credit Agreement, the Bank is currently entitled to 70% of all amounts distributed by FCMC.
The payment of any dividend, distribution or payment to FCMCs shareholders and the Bank
would result in a reduction of FCMCs stockholders equity and cash available for its operations.
46
A summary of FCMCs stand-alone financial results for the three months ended March 31, 2010
and 2009, and at March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
STATEMENT OF INCOME |
|
March 31, 2010 |
|
|
March 31, 2009 |
|
REVENUES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Servicing fees and other income |
|
$ |
5,675,865 |
|
|
$ |
7,881,321 |
|
Interest income |
|
|
9,246 |
|
|
|
50,612 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
|
5,685,111 |
|
|
|
7,931,933 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OPERATING EXPENSES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense |
|
|
21,858 |
|
|
|
4,664 |
|
Collection, general and administrative |
|
|
4,431,033 |
|
|
|
6,323,936 |
|
Depreciation |
|
|
144,356 |
|
|
|
156,648 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
|
4,597,247 |
|
|
|
6,485,248 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INCOME BEFORE PROVISION FOR INCOME TAXES |
|
$ |
1,087,864 |
|
|
$ |
1,446,685 |
|
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
434,550 |
|
|
|
578,674 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET INCOME |
|
$ |
653,314 |
|
|
$ |
868,011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BALANCE SHEET |
|
At March 31, 2010 |
|
|
At December 31, 2009 |
|
ASSETS: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
14,811,750 |
|
|
$ |
15,116,880 |
|
Restricted cash |
|
|
3,456,757 |
|
|
|
4,770,867 |
|
Receivables, fixed and other assets |
|
|
7,768,773 |
|
|
|
6,436,434 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
26,037,280 |
|
|
$ |
26,324,181 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt |
|
$ |
1,000,000 |
|
|
$ |
1,000,000 |
|
Servicing liabilities |
|
|
3,456,757 |
|
|
|
4,770,867 |
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
1,713,017 |
|
|
|
1,675,372 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
$ |
6,169,774 |
|
|
$ |
7,446,239 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
$ |
19,867,506 |
|
|
$ |
18,877,942 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
|
$ |
26,037,280 |
|
|
$ |
26,324,181 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SERVICING PORTFOLIO: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of loans serviced |
|
|
35,000 |
|
|
|
36,700 |
|
Unpaid principal balance serviced |
|
$ |
1.88 billion |
|
|
$ |
1.80 billion |
|
Results of Operations Franklin Credit Holding Corporation
Although the transfer of the trust certificates, representing approximately 83% of the
Portfolio, to the REIT was structured in substance as a sale of financial assets, the transfer, for
accounting purposes, is treated as a secured financing in accordance with ASC Topic 860 because for
accounting purposes the requisite level of certainty that the transferred assets have been legally
isolated from the Company and put presumptively beyond the reach of the Company and its creditors,
including in a bankruptcy proceeding, was not achieved. Therefore, the mortgage loans and real
estate have remained on the Companys
balance sheet classified as mortgage loans and real estate held for sale securing a
nonrecourse liability in an equal amount. The treatment as a financing on the Companys balance
sheet, however, did not affect the cash flows of the transfer, and does not affect the Companys
cash flows or its reported net income nor would it, necessarily, dictate the treatment of the
assets in a bankruptcy.
47
As a result, the fees received from Huntington subsequent to March 31, 2009 for servicing
their loans, and the third-party costs incurred by us in the servicing and collection of their
loans and reimbursed by Huntington, for purposes of these consolidated financial statements are not
recognized as servicing fees and reimbursement of third-party servicing costs, but as additional
interest and other income earned and additional, offsetting expenses as if the Company owned and
self serviced the loans.
Three Months Ended March 31, 2010 Compared to Three Months Ended March 31, 2009
Overview. As part of the Restructuring with the Bank on March 31, 2009, substantially all of
the Companys portfolio of subprime mortgage loans and owned real estate, was transferred to a
trust (with the loans and owned real estate transferred to the Trust collectively referred to
herein as the Portfolio) in exchange for trust certificates. In addition, at March 31, 2009, the
Company transferred trust certificates representing ownership of approximately 83%, or
approximately $760 million, of the Portfolio to Huntington and received preferred and common stock
in the amount of $477.3 million in Huntingtons REIT. Effective March 31, 2009, the carrying value
of the remaining approximately 17%, or $151.2 million, of the Portfolio, which was also transferred
to the Trust as part of the Restructuring in exchange for trust certificates (investments in trust
certificates at fair value) that are held by the Company, was reclassified as an investment
available for sale and, therefore, recorded at fair value approximating $95.8 million on March
31, 2009. In addition, the Company classified as an investment held for sale loans with a
carrying value of approximately $11.4 million representing the Companys remaining subprime
mortgage loans not subject to the Restructuring (notes receivable held for sale, net) that
collateralizes the Unrestructured Debt, which, on March 31, 2009, was recorded at fair value
approximating $4.3 million.
The Company had a net loss attributed to common stockholders of $6.7 million for the first
quarter of 2010, compared with a net loss of $362.4 million for the first quarter of 2009.
Revenues increased by $345.0 million to $19.5 million for the three months ended March 31, 2010,
from a loss of $325.5 million for the three months ended March 31, 2009. The Company had a loss
per common share for the three months ended March 31, 2010 of $0.84 both on a diluted and basic
basis, compared to a loss per share of $45.33 on both a diluted and basic basis for the three
months ended March 31, 2009. The net loss in the first quarter of 2009 resulted principally from
the loss recognized by the Company on 83% of the Portfolio contributed to the Trust as a result of
the transfer of trust certificates representing that percentage of ownership of the Trust to the
Bank in exchange for the preferred and common stock of the Banks REIT. The REIT Securities,
common and preferred shares, had an aggregate value of $477.3 million intended to approximate the
fair market value of the trust certificates transferred to the Bank as of March 31, 2009. The
Company incurred a loss of $282.6 million on the transfer of assets. In addition, the Company
recognized a loss of $62.7 million on the valuation of the remaining investments on the Companys
balance sheet, approximately 17% of the Portfolio transferred to a trust in exchange for trust
certificates and the remaining loans not subject to the Restructuring.
48
Our total debt outstanding increased slightly to $1.370 billion at March 31, 2010 from $1.368
billion at December 31, 2009. As a result of the March 31, 2009 restructuring of our debt and the
effect of an interest rate of 15% on $125 million of tranche C debt, interest expense (inclusive of
amortization of deferred financing costs and success fees) increased by $3.9 million, or 38%,
excluding the cost of the interest-rate swaps, during the first quarter of 2010 compared with the
same period in 2009. Our average cost of funds, including the cost of interest-rate swaps, during
the three months ended March 31, 2010
increased to 5.56% from 4.95% during the three months ended March 31, 2009. At March 31,
2010, the weighted average interest rate of borrowed funds was 3.98%. Collection, general and
administrative expenses decreased by $11.8 million, or 63%, to $6.9 million during the three months
ended March 31, 2010, from $18.7 million for the same period in 2009 due principally to costs
incurred in the first quarter of 2009 for the Restructuring and reduced third-party servicing costs
incurred for servicing the Banks portfolio. Stockholders deficit increased to $810.2 million at
March 31, 2010, or a deficit book value per common share at March 31, 2010 of approximately
$101.90, from stockholders deficit of $806.8 million at December 31, 2009.
Revenues. Revenues increased by $345.0 million to $19.5 million during the first quarter of
2010, from a loss of $325.5 million during the same period in 2009. Revenues include interest
income, dividend income, purchase discount earned, loss on mortgage loans and real estate held for
sale, loss on valuation of trust certificates and notes receivable held for sale, fair valuation
adjustments, gain on sale of OREO and servicing fees and other income.
Interest income decreased by $5.0 million, or 30%, to $11.5 million during the three months
ended March 31, 2010 from $16.5 million during the three months ended March 31, 2009. The decrease
in interest income reflected an approximate 27% increase in loans on nonaccrual due to increased
serious delinquencies in the Companys loan portfolios (to $1.21 billion at March 31, 2010 from
$949.5 million at March 31, 2009), which resulted in a reduction of $259.0 million in the amount of
loans on accrual status during the three months ended March 31, 2010, compared to the three months
ended March 31, 2009. The impact of interest reversals on loans placed on nonaccrual during the
three months ended March 31, 2010 and March 31, 2009 was approximately $33,000 and $2.5 million,
respectively.
Dividend income from the investment in REIT securities, received in exchange for Trust
Certificated transferred to the Banks REIT on March 31, 2009, was $10.6 million during the three
months ended March 31, 2010. There was no dividend income during the same period last year.
There was no purchase discount earned during the first quarter of 2010 as purchase discount on
loans acquired in past years was eliminated effective March 31, 2009 with the Restructuring.
During the first quarter of 2009, purchase discount earned amounted to $392,000.
Loss on mortgage loans and real estate held for sale, which was the result of the
Restructuring at March 31, 2009, was $282.6 million during the three months ended March 31, 2009.
There was no such loss during the first quarter of 2010 as subsequent changes in fair value are
reflected as Fair valuation adjustments. On March 31, 2009, the Company transferred trust
certificates in the Trust having a carrying value approximating $759.9 million, representing
approximately 83% of the trust certificates representing the Portfolio previously transferred to
the Trust, in exchange for preferred and common stock in Huntingtons REIT (REIT Securities) with a
fair market value approximating $477.3 million. The loss represented the application of fair
market value accounting that resulted in a write-down to fair market value. Included in the
realized loss from the March 31, 2009 exchange was a charge-off of accrued interest on the loans
exchanged in the amount of $8.6 million that was not collected as part of the Restructuring.
Loss on valuation of investment in trust certificates, mortgage loans and real estate held for
sale, which was the result of the Restructuring at March 31, 2009, was $62.7 million during the
three months ended March 31, 2009. There was no such loss during the first quarter of 2010 as
subsequent changes in fair value are reflected as Fair valuation adjustments. At March 31, 2009,
effective with the Restructuring, the retained trust certificates in the Trust had a book value of
approximately $151.2 million, representing approximately the remaining 17% of the Companys
economic interest in the Portfolio, exclusive of the assets collateralizing the Unrestructured
Debt, were classified as available for
sale and fair market value accounting was applied that resulted in a write-down to fair
market value approximating $95.8 million. The loans collateralizing the Unrestructured Debt with a
carrying value of $11.4 million were classified as held for sale and adjusted to approximate the
fair market value of $4.1 million, which resulted in a realized a loss of $7.3 million.
49
Fair valuation adjustments (fair value adjustments of the investment in trust certificates and
the nonrecourse liability) amounted to a net loss of $3.8 million for the three months ended March
31, 2010. Included in the fair valuation adjustments in the three months ended March 31, 2010 were
a net increase of $2.0 million in the valuation of the nonrecourse liability, a gain on OREO sold
in the amount of $1.8 million, a valuation gain on trust certificates of $2.0 million and various
other net negative adjustments of approximately $7.6, which included expenses recognized on the
nonrecourse liability equal to the interest income and fees received of approximately $5.2 million
and fair value adjustments to the nonrecourse liability for offsets to OREO gains of approximately
a negative $2.4 million. There was no such loss during the first quarter of 2009.
During the three months ended March 31, 2010, gains and losses on sales of OREO were reflected
as fair valuation adjustments. During the three months ended March 31, 2009, we realized a net
gain of $374,000 from the sales of 198 OREO properties with an aggregate carrying value of $18.9
million.
Servicing fees and other income (principally third-party subservicing fees, third-party
acquisition services fees and late charges, prepayment penalties and other miscellaneous servicing
revenues) decreased by $1.3 million, or 53%, to $1.2 million during the three months ended March
31, 2010 from $2.5 million during the corresponding period last year. This decrease was
principally the result of decreased recoveries of outside foreclosure attorney costs from
delinquent borrowers, reduced late charges collected from delinquent borrowers, decreased
prepayment penalties due to a continuing slower rate of loan payoffs, the nonaccrual of
administrative fees associated with services provided to the Bosco entity by FCMC, and a reduction
of $392,000 in the servicing fees recognized on the portfolio of loans serviced for Bosco as a
result of amendments to the servicing contract with Bosco effective in February and October 2009.
The decreases in income were partially offset by $117,000 of due diligence fees earned from third
parties during the three months ended March 31, 2010.
Operating Expenses. Operating expenses decreased by $10.8 million, or 29%, to $26.1 million
during the first quarter of 2010 from $36.9 million during the same period in 2009. Total
operating expenses include interest expense, collection, general and administrative expenses,
provisions for loan losses, amortization of deferred financing costs and depreciation expense.
Interest expense increased by $1.3 million, or 8%, to $19.0 million during the three months
ended March 31, 2010, from $17.7 million during the three months ended March 31, 2009. This
increase was the result of a higher average cost of funds during the three months ended March 31,
2010 of 5.56%, compared to 4.95% during the three months ended March 31, 2009, principally
reflecting the interest cost of the Companys tranche C debt, the principal amount of which
increased from $125 million at March 31, 2009 to $145.4 million at March 31, 2010 due to the
addition of accrued and unpaid interest at a fixed interest rate of 15%. The Company has in place
fixed-rate interest rate swaps in order to limit the negative effect of a rise in short-term
interest rates by effectively stabilizing the future interest payments on a portion of its
variable-rate debt. Because short-term interest rates have actually declined in the months
following the purchases of these swaps and due to the amortization of the AOCL balance, which was
offset somewhat by an increase in the fair value of the swaps, the interest rate swaps actually
increased the Companys interest cost in the quarter ended March 31, 2010 by $5.5 million.
However, compared with the same quarter of 2009, the cost of the interest-rate swaps decreased by
$2.6 million. At
March 31, 2010, the weighted average interest rate of our borrowed funds, exclusive of the
effect of the interest-rate swaps, was 3.98%, compared with 4.02% at March 31, 2009.
50
Collection, general and administrative expenses decreased by $11.8 million, or 63%, to $6.9
million during the three months ended March 31, 2010, from $18.7 million during the corresponding
period in 2009. For the purpose of comparing collection, general and administrative expenses
incurred by the Company on a recurring basis, the following costs are excluded from the
quarter-to-quarter change analysis: (i) Restructuring costs incurred in the first quarter of 2009
in the aggregate amount of $5.5 million and not incurred in the current quarter; and, (ii)
third-party servicing expenses, which since the March 31, 2009 Restructuring are reimbursed by the
Bank, in the aggregate amount of $1.8 million and $5.8 million, respectively, during the quarter
ended March 31, 2010 and 2009. These third-party servicing expenses are, however, included in the
consolidated statements of operations due to the treatment for accounting purposes of the
transfer of the trust certificates, representing ownership in approximately 83% of the Portfolio
transferred to the REIT, as a financing in accordance with GAAP and, as a result the mortgage loans
and real estate have remained on the Companys balance sheet. Therefore, the third-party costs
incurred by us in the servicing and collection of the Banks loans and reimbursed by the Bank, for
purposes of these consolidated financial statements, are not treated as reimbursed third-party
servicing costs but as additional collection, general and administrative expenses as if
the Company owned and self serviced the loans, with an offsetting amount included in fair valuation
adjustments, which had no impact on the Companys consolidated net loss. The third-party servicing
costs were substantially reduced in the three months ended March 31, 2010 from the same period
ended March 31, 2009 as the Bank has modified the work rules for the Company as servicer of their
loans, particularly for collection, loss mitigation, deficiency foreclosure, bankruptcy
and judgment activities for delinquent loans, and OREO, and there were substantially fewer OREO
properties and OREO additions and dispositions during the 2010 quarter. In addition, reimbursable
force-placed insurance premiums amounting to approximately $678,000 were not billed by the
insurance carrier for the three months ended March 31. 2010 and, therefore, not reimbursed by the
Bank during the first quarter of 2010. These costs will be reimbursed by the Bank in the second
quarter of 2010 and included in collection, general and administrative expenses in the
second quarter of 2010, and because of the accounting treatment described above, there will be no
impact on the Companys consolidated net income or loss.
Exclusive of these items described above, collection, general and administrative expenses
decreased by $2.3 million, or 32%, in the three months ended March 31, 2010, from $7.4 million
during the corresponding period in 2009. Salaries and employee benefits expenses decreased by $1.9
million, or 39%, to $3.0 million during the three months ended March 31, 2010, from $4.9 million
during the three months ended March 31, 2009, due to reductions in staff throughout the Company.
The number of servicing employees decreased to 112 at March 31, 2010, from 156 employees at March
31, 2009. The Company ended the three months ended March 31, 2010 with 153 employees, compared
with 215 employees at March 31, 2009. The Company also experienced a decrease in corporate legal
expenditures of $335,000, or 44%, to $421,000 from $757,000 as compared to the same three-month
period last year, with the decrease principally related to additional legal costs for a
nonrecurring matter that had been incurred in the prior year quarter. Professional fees decreased
by $156,000, or 29%, to $380,000 from $536,000, principally due to reduced outside audit fees,
compared to the same period last year. The reduction in outside audit fees was due to (i) the
Companys changed business model where the complex accounting for possible loan losses and purchase
discount on acquired subprime portfolios of mortgage loans is no longer necessary and (ii)
managements evaluation of the costs of outside audit services, including a competitive bid
process, resulted in securing outside audit services at a reduced cost. Various other general and
administrative expenses increased slightly by $30,000 during the three months ended March 31, 2010.
51
There was no provision for loan losses during the three months ended March 31, 2010, compared
with a provision of $169,000 during the three months ended March 31, 2009. The absence of a
provision for loan losses during the three months ended March 31, 2010 and the virtual absence of a
provision for loan losses in the 2009 first quarter are reflective of the transfer of a significant
portion of our portfolio of notes receivable, loans held for sale and OREO properties to the Bank
on March 31, 2009 and the exchange and retention, principally in the form of trust certificates, of
the remaining portion of our portfolio of notes receivable, loans held for sale and OREO properties
as part of the Restructuring. As a result of the Restructuring and the exchange of the Companys
loans and OREO assets for investments carried at either fair market value or lower of cost or
market value, an allowance for loan losses is no longer necessary.
Amortization of deferred financing costs decreased by $132,000, or 79%, to $35,000 during the
first quarter of 2010 from $167,000 during the first quarter of 2009. This decrease resulted
primarily from a reduction in portfolio collections that culminated in a decrease in the pay down
of our borrowed funds made in accordance with the terms of the Restructuring Agreements.
Depreciation expenses decreased by $11,000, or 7%, to $146,000 in the first quarter of 2010.
This decrease during the three months ended March 31, 2010 was principally due to fully depreciated
assets during the past twelve months and a reduction in assets purchased compared with the same
quarterly period in 2009.
Our pre-tax loss decreased by $355.8 million to a loss of $6.6 million during the three months
ended March 31, 2010, from a loss of $362.4 million during the three months ended March 31, 2009
for the reasons set forth above.
The Company recorded state income tax expense of $98,000 on income from one of its
subsidiaries during the three months ended March 31, 2010. There was no provision for income taxes
during the three months ended March 31, 2009.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
General
We ceased to acquire and originate loans in November 2007, and under the terms of the
Restructuring Agreements, the Company cannot originate or acquire mortgage loans or other assets
without the prior consent of the Bank.
As of March 31, 2010, we had one limited source of external funding to meet our liquidity
requirements, in addition to the cash flow provided from servicing loans and performing due
diligence services for third parties, dividends from preferred stock in a REIT owned by a
Huntington subsidiary, and borrower payments of interest and principal from the notes receivable
held for sale and the mortgage loans collateralizing the owned trust certificates. See Note 1 -
Business Going Concern Uncertainty Franklin Holding and Note 7 Notes Payable and Financing
Agreements March 2009 Restructuring.
We are required to submit all payments we receive from our preferred stock investments, the
trust certificates that we own and the notes receivable held for sale to a lockbox, which is
controlled by the Bank. Substantially all amounts submitted to the lockbox are used to pay down
amounts outstanding under our Legacy Credit Agreement with the Bank. If the cash flow received
from servicing loans and performing due diligence services for third parties is insufficient to
sustain the cost of operating our business, and we have fully utilized our licensing credit
facilities, there is no guarantee that we can continue in business. Effective as of March 31,
2010, the Bank can terminate without cause its servicing
agreement with the Company without penalty and with not less than 90 days prior written notice
to the Company.
52
Short-term Investments. The Companys investment policy is structured to provide an adequate
level of liquidity in order to meet normal working capital needs, while taking minimal credit risk.
As of March 31, 2010, all of the Companys unrestricted cash was invested in money market accounts
and certificates of deposits held at The Huntington National Bank.
Cash Flow from Operating, Investing and Financing Activities
Liquidity represents our ability to obtain adequate funding to meet our financial
obligations. As of March 31, 2010 and since March 31, 2009, our liquidity position is, and has
been, affected principally by the collections from servicing the trust certificates and the
dividends received from the preferred stock investment in the Huntington subsidiary REIT.
At March 31, 2010, we had cash and cash equivalents of $19.0 million compared with $16.0
million at December 31, 2009. Restricted cash of $2.6 million at both March 31, 2010 and December
31, 2009, was restricted under our credit agreements and lockbox facility with our bank.
Changes in several of the cash flows noted in the explanations that follow were the result of
the March 31, 2009 Restructuring and the resultant changed asset classifications form notes
receivable and originated loans held for investment to investment in trust certificates at fair
value and mortgage loans and real estate held for sale.
Net cash provided by operating activities was $20.1 million as of March 31, 2010, compared
with net cash used of $9.5 million during the three months ended March 31, 2009. The increase in
cash provided by operating activities was primarily due to the decrease in the net loss
attributable to common shareholders of $6.7 million during the three months ended March 31, 2010
from $362.4 million during the same period last year; increases in principal collections on
mortgage loans held for sale and proceeds from the sale of real estate held for sale during the
period, payment in kind interest, and income tax receivable; and, the absence of significant
changes in other assets and the terminated derivative liability.
Net cash provided by investing activities was $233,000 in the three months ended March 31,
2010, compared to $42.3 million of cash provided in the three months ended March 31, 2009. The
decrease in cash provided by investing activities during the three months ended March 31, 2010 was
due primarily to reductions in principal collections on both notes receivable and loans held for
investment and decreased proceeds from the sale of OREO properties.
Net cash used in financing activities decreased to approximately $17.3 million during the
three months ended March 31, 2010, compared to $30.3 million used during the three months ended
March 31, 2009. The decrease in cash used in financing activities during the three months ended
March 31, 2010 was due to a reduction in principal payments of notes receivable for the reasons set
forth above.
Borrowings
As of March 31, 2010, the Company had total borrowings of $1.37 billion under the
Restructuring Agreements, of which $1.33 billion was subject to the Legacy Credit Agreement and
$39.1 million remained under a credit facility excluded from the Restructuring Agreements (the
Unrestructured Debt). During the three months ended March 31, 2010, while the Company made
principal payments on the senior portion (tranche A) of the notes payable in the amount of $6.1
million, total notes payable outstanding increased by $1.9 million. While the balance of the
tranche A debt was reduced by $6.1
million during the three months ended March 31, 2010, the balance of the subordinate portions
(tranches B and C) of notes payable actually increased during this three-month period as interest
due and unpaid was accrued and added to the outstanding debt balance as per the terms of
Restructuring Agreements, which require all available cash to be applied to interest and principal
on tranche A until paid in full before payments can be applied to tranches B and C.
53
Substantially all of the debt under these facilities was incurred in connection with the
Companys purchase and origination of residential 1-4 family mortgage loans prior to December 2007.
We ceased to acquire and originate loans in November 2007, and under the terms of the
Restructuring Agreements, the Company cannot originate or acquire mortgage loans or other assets
without the prior consent of the Bank. These borrowings are shown in the Companys financial
statements as Notes payable (referred to as term loans or term debt herein).
At December 31, 2009, FCMC owed $1 million under the revolving line of its Licensing Credit
Agreement with the Bank, which is shown in the Companys financial statements as Financing
agreement.
See Note 7 Notes Payable and Financing Agreements.
Interest Rate Swaps
Effective February 27, 2008, the Company entered into $725 million (notional amount) of
fixed-rate interest rate swaps in order to effectively stabilize the future interest payments on a
portion of its interest-sensitive borrowings. The fixed-rate swaps are for periods ranging from
one to four years, are non-amortizing, and are in effect for the respective full terms of each swap
agreement. These swaps effectively fixed the Companys interest costs on a portion of its
borrowings regardless of increases or decreases in the one-month LIBOR. The interest rate swaps
were executed with the Companys lead lending bank and are for the following terms: $220 million
notional amount for one year at a fixed rate of 2.62%; $390 million notional amount for two-years
at a fixed rate of 2.79%; $70 million notional amount for three years at a fixed rate of 3.11%;
and, $45 million notional amount for four years at a fixed rate of 3.43%. On March 5, 2009, $220
million of one-year interest rate swaps matured and have not been replaced.
Effective April 30, 2008, the Company entered into an additional $275 million (notional
amount) of fixed-rate interest rate swaps in order to effectively stabilize the future interest
payments on a portion of its interest-sensitive borrowings. The fixed-rate swaps are for a period
of three years, are non-amortizing, and at a fixed rate of 3.47%. These swaps reduced further the
Companys exposure to future increases in interest costs on a portion of its borrowings due to
increases in one-month LIBOR during the remaining terms of the swap agreements. The interest rate
swaps were executed with the Companys lead lending bank.
Under these swap agreements, the Company makes interest payments to its lead lending bank at
fixed rates and receives interest payments from its lead lending bank on the same notional amounts
at variable rates based on LIBOR. Effective December 28, 2007, the Company pays interest on its
interest-sensitive borrowings, principally based on one-month LIBOR plus applicable margins.
54
In conjunction with the Restructuring, and at the request of the Bank, effective March 31,
2009, the Company exercised its right to terminate two non-amortizing fixed-rate interest rate
swaps with the Bank, one with a notional amount of $150 million and the other with a notional
amount of $240 million. The total termination fee for cancellation of the swaps was $8.2 million,
which is payable only to the extent cash is available under the waterfall provisions of the Legacy
Credit Agreement, and only after
$764.5 million remaining at March 31, 2010 of Tranche A debt owed to the Bank has been paid in
full. See Note 7 Notes Payable and Financing Agreements.
The unamortized balance of derivative losses in the amount of $24.0 million, as a result of
the Company electing to cease hedge accounting as of December 31, 2008, is amortized to interest
expense over time. The amount amortized during the quarter ended March 31, 2010 was $3.3 million,
which increased our interest expense.
The following table presents the notional and fair value amounts of the interest rate swaps
outstanding at March 31, 2010.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notional Amount |
|
|
Term |
|
|
Maturity Date |
|
|
Fixed Rate |
|
|
Estimated Fair Value* |
|
$ |
275,000,000 |
|
|
3 years |
|
|
March 5, 2011 |
|
|
3.47 |
% |
|
$ |
(8,621,583 |
) |
|
70,000,000 |
|
|
3 years |
|
|
March 5, 2011 |
|
|
3.11 |
% |
|
|
(1,702,058 |
) |
|
45,000,000 |
|
|
4 years |
|
|
March 5, 2012 |
|
|
3.43 |
% |
|
|
(1,983,894 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
390,000,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(12,307,535 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Determined in accordance with Topic 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures,
based upon a Level 2 valuation methodology. |
55
|
|
|
ITEM 3. |
|
QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK |
We are exposed to various types of market risk in the normal course of business, including the
impact of interest rate changes, real estate, delinquency and default risks of the loans that we
service for third parties, the loans in our portfolio (although transferred to the Bank, for
accounting purposes the portfolio is treated as a financing under GAAP and remains on the balance
sheet), and changes in corporate tax rates. A material change in these rates or risks could
adversely affect our operating results and cash flows.
Impact of Inflation
The Company measures its financial condition and operating results in historical dollars
without considering changes in the purchasing power of money over time due to inflation, although
the impact of inflation is reflected in increases in the costs of our operations. Substantially
all of the Companys assets and liabilities are monetary in nature, and therefore, interest rates
have a greater impact on our performance than the general effects of inflation. Because a
substantial portion of the Companys borrowings are sensitive to changes in short-term interest
rates, any increase in inflation, which often gives rise to increases in interest rates, could
materially impact the Companys financial performance.
Interest Rate Risk
Interest rate fluctuations can adversely affect our operating results and present a variety of
risks, including the risk of a mismatch between the repricing of interest-earning assets and
borrowings, and variances in the yield curve.
Interest rates are highly sensitive to many factors, including governmental monetary policies
and domestic and international economic and political conditions. Conditions such as inflation,
recession, unemployment, money supply and other factors beyond our control may also affect interest
rates. Fluctuations in market interest rates are neither predictable nor controllable and may have
a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
The Companys operating results depend in large part on differences between the interest
earned on its assets and the interest paid on its borrowings. Most of the Companys assets,
consisting primarily of REIT Securities (principally preferred REIT stock) and Trust Certificates
(collateralized by mortgage loans and real estate owned properties) generate fixed returns and have
remaining contractual maturities in excess of five years. Our borrowings are based on one-month
LIBOR. In most cases, the interest income from our assets will respond more slowly to interest
rate fluctuations than the cost of our borrowings, creating a mismatch between interest earned on
our interest-yielding assets and the interest paid on our borrowings. Consequently, changes in
interest rates, particularly short-term interest rates, will significantly impact our net interest
income and, therefore, net income. Our borrowings bear interest at rates that fluctuate with the
one-month LIBOR rate. We use from time to time interest-rate derivatives, essentially
interest-rate swaps, to hedge our interest rate exposure by converting a portion of our highly
interest-sensitive borrowings from variable-rate payments to fixed-rate payments. Based on
approximately $834.9 million of unhedged interest-rate sensitive borrowings outstanding at March
31, 2010, a 1% instantaneous and sustained increase in one-month LIBOR could increase quarterly
interest expense by as much as approximately $2.1 million, pre-tax, during the remaining terms of
the swap agreements, which would negatively impact our quarterly after-tax net income or loss. Due
to our liability-sensitive balance sheet, increases in these rates will decrease both net income,
or increase net loss, and the market value of our net assets. If the Companys existing swap
contracts expire, and are not renewed, a 1% instantaneous and sustained increase in one-month LIBOR
would have the effect of
increasing quarterly interest expense by approximately $3.1 million, pre-tax. See
Managements Discussion and Analysis Borrowings.
56
Real Estate Risk
Residential property values are subject to volatility and may be affected adversely by a
number of factors, including, but not limited to, national, regional and local economic conditions,
which may be adversely affected by industry slowdowns and other factors; local real estate
conditions (such as the supply of housing or the rapid increase in home values). Decreases in
property values reduce the value of the collateral and the potential proceeds available to
borrowers to repay their mortgage loans, which could cause the value of our investments not carried
at cost to decrease.
|
|
|
ITEM 4T. |
|
CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES |
Disclosure Controls and Procedures
The Companys management, with the participation of the Companys Principal Executive Officer
and Chief Financial Officer, has evaluated the effectiveness of the Companys disclosure controls
and procedures (such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act as of
the end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. Based upon that evaluation,
the Companys Principal Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that the Companys
disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of the end of the period covered by this
report.
Changes in Internal Controls over Financial Reporting
There have been no changes in the Companys internal control over financial reporting during
the quarter ended March 31, 2010 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to
materially affect, such internal control over financial reporting.
57
PART II
OTHER INFORMATION
|
|
|
ITEM 1. |
|
LEGAL PROCEEDINGS |
We are involved in routine litigation matters generally incidental to our business, which
primarily consist of legal actions related to the enforcement of our rights under mortgage loans we
hold, held, service or collect for others, none of which is individually or in the aggregate
material. In addition, because we originated, acquired, service and collect on mortgage loans
throughout the country, we must comply and were required to comply with various state and federal
lending, servicing and debt collection laws, rules and regulations and we are routinely subject to
investigation and inquiry by regulatory agencies, some of which arise from complaints filed by
borrowers, none of which is individually or in the aggregate material.
Risk factors applicable to the Company, including, but not limited to, those factors discussed
under the captions Impact of Inflation, Interest Rate Risk and Real Estate Risk are contained
in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009, filed with the
SEC on March 31, 2010.
The risk factors discussed in detail in the Companys Form 10-K include the following:
Risks Related to Our Business
|
|
A prolonged economic slowdown or a lengthy or severe recession could harm our operations,
particularly if it results in a decline in the real estate market. |
|
|
The Company may not be able to continue as a going concern. |
|
|
Our credit facilities and servicing agreement with the Bank require us to observe certain
covenants, and our failure to satisfy such covenants could render us insolvent. |
|
|
Based on our current rate of collections on the assets we transferred to the Trust under
the Restructuring Agreement, without a significant special transaction, we may not be able to
achieve the minimum amount of net remittances necessary to reduce the pledge of FCMC stock to
the Bank from 70% to a minimum of 20% (which due to a failure to achieve the first collection
target by March 31, 2010, the minimum is currently 25%) or at all. |
|
|
If our lenders fail to renew our loans under the Licensing Credit Agreement for additional
terms or provide us with refinancing opportunities, our indebtedness under the $2 million
revolving line will become due and payable in 2011; and, the draw line for working capital
needs of FCMC will expire on May 31, 2010. |
|
|
If our lenders fail to renew our loans under the Legacy Credit Agreement for additional
terms or provide us with refinancing opportunities, our legacy indebtedness will become due
and payable in 2012. |
58
|
|
If our lenders fail to extend the Forbearance Agreement covering the Unrestructured Debt,
the Unrestructured Debt will become due and payable and the Bank would be able to foreclose on
the portion of the stock of FCMC pledged to it. |
|
|
The Bank may transfer our rights as servicer to the assets we transferred to the Trust
under the Restructuring Agreement to a third party (including, but not limited to, any of the
loans affecting our ability to meet net worth requirements in New York). |
|
|
Our ability to fund operating expenses depends on the cash flow received from servicing
loans for third parties. |
|
|
Our business is sensitive to, and can be materially affected by, changes in interest rates. |
|
|
The Bank may prevent our pursuing future business opportunities. |
|
|
We may not be successful in entering into or implementing our planned business of providing
servicing and other mortgage related services for other entities on a fee-paying basis. |
|
|
If we do not obtain and maintain the appropriate state licenses, we will not be allowed to
service mortgage loans in some states, which would adversely affect our operations. |
|
|
A significant amount of the mortgage loans that we originated prior to the Restructuring
and transferred to the Trust as part of the Restructuring are secured by property in New York
and New Jersey, and our operations could be harmed by economic downturns or other adverse
events in these states. |
|
|
We may not be adequately protected against the risks inherent in servicing subprime
residential mortgage loans. |
|
|
A number of the second-lien mortgage loans that we service are subordinated to ARM or
interest-only mortgages that may be subject to monthly payment increases, which may result in
delinquencies and a decrease in servicing and collection revenues. |
|
|
We are subject to losses from the mortgage loans we acquired and originated prior to the
Restructuring due to fraudulent and negligent acts on the part of loan applicants, mortgage
brokers, sellers of loans we acquired, vendors and our employees. |
|
|
Legal proceedings could be brought which could adversely affect our financial results. |
|
|
Given the nature of the industry in which we operate, our businesses is, and in the future
may become, involved in various legal proceedings the ultimate resolution of which is
inherently unpredictable and could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial
position, results of operations or cash flows. |
|
|
We are exposed to counter-party risk and there can be no assurances that we will manage or
mitigate this risk effectively. |
|
|
The success and growth of our servicing business will depend on our ability to adapt to and
implement technological changes, and any failure to do so could result in a material adverse
effect on our business. |
59
|
|
If we do not manage the changes in our businesses effectively, our financial performance
could be harmed. |
|
|
The inability to attract and retain qualified employees could significantly harm our
business. |
|
|
An interruption in or breach of our information systems may result in lost business and
increased expenses. |
|
|
We are exposed to the risk of environmental liabilities with respect to properties to which
we take title. |
|
|
A loss of our Chairman and President may adversely affect our operations. |
Risks Related to Our Financial Statements
|
|
Our financial condition and financial results can be materially affected by Federal
Reserves Board policies and the capital markets. |
|
|
We may become subject to liability and incur increased expenditures as a result of the
restatement of our financial statements. |
|
|
We may become subject to liability and incur increased expenditures as a result of our
having reassessed our allowance for loan losses and our transfer of substantially all our
mortgage portfolio related assets to the Bank. |
|
|
Failures in our internal controls and disclosure controls and procedures could lead to
material errors in our financial statements and cause us to fail to meet our reporting
obligations. |
Risks Related to the Regulation of Our Industry
|
|
New legislation and regulations directed at curbing predatory lending practices could
restrict our ability to service non-prime residential mortgage loans, which could adversely
impact our earnings. |
|
|
The broad scope of our operations exposes us to risks of noncompliance with an increasing
and inconsistent body of complex laws and regulations at the federal, state and local levels. |
|
|
We may be subject to fines or other penalties based upon the conduct of our independent
brokers. |
|
|
We are subject to reputation risks from negative publicity concerning the subprime mortgage
industry. |
|
|
We are subject to significant legal and reputation risks and expenses under federal and
state laws concerning privacy, use and security of customer information. |
|
|
If many of the borrowers of the loans we service become subject to the Servicemembers Civil
Relief Act of 2003, our cash flows and service fee income may be adversely affected. |
|
|
Legislative action to provide mortgage relief may negatively impact our business. |
60
Risks Related to Our Securities
|
|
Thomas J. Axon effectively controls our company, substantially reducing the influence of
our other stockholders. |
|
|
Our common stock is quoted only on the OTC Bulletin Board, which may adversely impact the
price and liquidity of the common stock, and our ability to raise capital. |
|
|
Our organizational documents, Delaware law and our Restructuring Agreements may make it
harder for us to be acquired without the consent and cooperation of our board of directors,
management and our Bank. |
|
|
Our quarterly operating results may fluctuate and cause our stock price to decline. |
|
|
Compliance with the rules of the market in which our common stock trades, and proposed and
recently enacted changes in securities laws and regulations are likely to increase our costs. |
There have been no material changes from the risk factors previously disclosed in Item 1A of
our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009, other than as set forth below,
which risk factors should be read in conjunction with the other risk factors disclosed in our
Form 10-K.
There is no assurance that the New York State Banking Department will find the written capital
plan of FCMC acceptable and not request modifications to the capital plan or deny FCMCs
application for registration as a mortgage servicer or that FCMC will be able to regain compliance
with regulatory net worth requirements in New York State.
By letter dated April 12, 2010, the New York State Banking Department (the Banking
Department) advised FCMC that in connection with its review of its financial statements and
mortgage servicing volume, its application for registration as a mortgage servicer in that state,
which FCMC had filed during the transitional period allowed by the state for registration of
mortgage servicers doing business in New York State on June 30, 2009, cannot be accepted for
processing until FCMC addresses its net worth, which as adjusted (Adjusted Net Worth) and
calculated by the Banking Department was determined to be below the minimum Adjusted Net Worth
requirement for mortgage servicers established under applicable regulations adopted through
emergency rule making.
The emergency regulations, which were adopted by the New York State Superintendent of Banks
and which implement the statutory registration requirement for mortgage servicers in New York State
that went into effect on July 1, 2009, require (i) an Adjusted Net Worth of at least 1% of the
outstanding principal balance of aggregate mortgage loans serviced (whether or not in New York),
but in any event not less than $250,000; and, (ii) a ratio of Adjusted Net Worth to the outstanding
principal balance of New York mortgage loans serviced of at least 5%. Although the latest version
of the emergency regulations are effective March 17, 2010 until June 12, 2010, the Banking
Department has indicated that it expects to propose permanent regulations in substantially similar
form as the emergency regulations for public comment in the near future.
Adjusted Net Worth, as defined under the Superintendents emergency regulations, consists of
total equity capital at the end of the reporting period as determined by GAAP less: goodwill,
intangible assets (excluding mortgage servicing rights), any assets pledged to secure obligations
of a person other than the applicant, any assets due from officers or stockholders of the applicant
or related companies; that portion of any marketable securities (listed or unlisted) not shown at
lower of cost or market; any amount in excess of the lower of cost or market value of mortgages in
foreclosure, construction loans or property
acquired through foreclosure, and any amount shown on the balance sheet as investments in
unconsolidated joint ventures, subsidiaries, affiliates, and/or other related companies that is
greater than the value of such investments accounted for using the equity method of accounting.
61
At March 31, 2010, FCMC serviced mortgage loans (as defined under the Superintendents
emergency regulations) throughout the United States with an outstanding principal balance of
approximately $1.61 billion, serviced New York mortgage loans with an outstanding principal balance
of approximately $158.2 million, and had an Adjusted Net Worth of approximately $8.0 million (with
net worth under GAAP of $19.9 million). Although the ratio of Adjusted Net Worth of FCMC to the
outstanding principal balance of New York mortgage loans is greater than the required 5%, the
Adjusted Net Worth of FCMC falls short of the 1% of the outstanding principal balance of aggregate
mortgage loans serviced in the United States by approximately $8.1 million. Accordingly, the
Banking Department has required that FCMC provide a written capital plan acceptable to the Banking
Department, which among other prerequisites would address how FCMC intends to achieve compliance,
on an ongoing basis with the regulatory net worth requirements, and commit FCMC to maintaining a
minimum Adjusted Net Worth of 0.25% of aggregate loans serviced in the United States (which is
lower than the requirement under the emergency regulations) and 5% of New York mortgage loans
serviced, whichever is higher while it seeks to restore such compliance.
On May 10, 2010, in an initial step towards increasing FCMCs Adjusted Net Worth, we utilized
funds recently received from a Federal income tax refund to reduce the net inter-company receivable
in the amount of $2.5 million due to FCMC by its affiliated companies. This step increased
Adjusted Net Worth to approximately $10.5 million, or approximately 0.65% of the aggregate
principal balance of loans serviced nationwide.
Additionally, FCMC expects to curtail the pro rata distributions or payments to the Bank and
dividends to its shareholders that are ordinarily required under the terms of the Licensing Credit
Agreement, as amended. Pursuant to such terms, the distributions are not required where they would
give rise to a default under the Licensing Credit Agreement, which would occur if FCMC is unable to
increase its Adjusted Net Worth, and as a result, fails to obtain or maintain a license as a
registered mortgage servicer in New York.
The capital plan as proposed by FCMC and submitted to the Banking Department on May 12, 2010
includes in relevant part a commitment, until FCMC is in full compliance with the net worth
requirements for mortgage servicers in New York State, to (i) meet regulatory net worth
requirements as soon as practicable but in no event later than December 31, 2012 through the
retention of net earnings and dividend restrictions, (ii) maintain an interim Adjusted Net Worth
until FCMC complies with regulatory net worth requirements of not less than approximately $7.9
million (Minimum Level), and not less than 5% of the principal balance of New York mortgage loans
serviced by FCMC and 0.25% of the aggregate mortgage loans serviced in the United States, (iii)
not, without the prior written consent of the Banking Department, service additional mortgage loans
secured by 1-4 family residential homes located in New York State, (iv) not declare or pay any
dividends upon the shares of its capital stock, and (v) submit quarterly reports on the total
number of and principal balance of loans serviced and its Adjusted Net Worth.
There is no assurance that the New York State Banking Department will find the written capital
plan of FCMC acceptable and not request modifications to the capital plan or deny FCMCs
application for registration as a mortgage servicer or that FCMC will be able to regain compliance
with regulatory net worth requirements in New York State. There is also no assurance that the Bank
(i) will not restrict FCMCs ability to comply with its capital plan, (ii) terminate FCMC as a
servicer of the New York
mortgage loans transferred to the Trust, or (iii) sell the New York mortgage loans transferred
to the Trust to an entity that chooses not to retain FCMC as a servicer.
62
A denial of our application to be a registered mortgage servicer in the State of New York by
the New York State Banking Department could result in an event of default under the Servicing
Agreement entitling the Bank to terminate the Servicing Agreement, as well as a default under the
Licensing Credit Agreement and Legacy Credit Agreement, which would entitle the Bank to foreclose
on our assets pledged to the Bank, including on the Franklin Holdings pledge of 70% of the common
stock of Franklin Credit Management Corporation.
If FCMCs application is denied by the Banking Department, or FCMC is unable or fails to
comply with a written capital plan approved by the Banking Department, FCMC will no longer be able
to service mortgage loans secured by 1-4 family residential homes located in New York State. Under
the Servicing Agreement entered into on March 31, 2009 as part of the Restructuring with the Bank,
it would be an event of default if FCMC failed to maintain its license to do business in any
jurisdiction where any mortgaged property or other real estate property serviced under the
servicing agreement is located if such license is required and such failure continues unremedied
for ten (10) days, which, if the same were to occur, would entitle the Bank to terminate the
Servicing Agreement. In addition, such a failure to obtain or maintain our license to service
mortgages loans as a registered mortgage servicer in New York would be a default under the
Licensing Credit Agreement and Legacy Credit Agreement and with notice, the Bank could also call an
event of default under those agreements entered into in connection with the Restructuring, which,
among other remedies, would entitle the Bank to foreclose on our assets pledged to the Bank,
including on Franklin Holdings pledge of 70% of the common stock of FCMC.
|
|
|
ITEM 2. |
|
UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS |
None.
|
|
|
ITEM 3. |
|
DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES |
None.
|
|
|
ITEM 4. |
|
(REMOVED AND RESERVED) |
|
|
|
ITEM 5. |
|
OTHER INFORMATION |
None.
63
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit |
Number |
|
3.1 |
|
|
First Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation.
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the
Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the Commission) on
December 24, 2008. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.2 |
|
|
Amended and Restated By-laws. Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 3.2 to the Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K,
filed with the Commission on December 24, 2008. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.1 |
* |
|
Employment Agreement, effective as of January 11, 2010,
between Franklin Credit Management Corporation and Jimmy
Yan.() |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.2 |
* |
|
Employee Restricted Stock Grant Agreement, dated as of
January 11, 2010, between the Registrant and Jimmy
Yan.() |
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.1 |
* |
|
Rule 13a-14(a) Certification of Chief Executive Officer of
the Registrant in accordance with Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.2 |
* |
|
Rule 13a-14(a) Certification of Chief Financial Officer of
the Registrant in accordance with Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
32.1 |
* |
|
Section 1350 Certification of Chief Executive Officer of
the Registrant in accordance with Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
32.2 |
* |
|
Section 1350 Certification of Chief Financial Officer of
the Registrant in accordance with Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
* |
|
Filed herewith. |
|
() |
|
Management contracts and compensation plans and arrangements. |
64
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
FRANKLIN CREDIT HOLDING CORPORATION
|
|
May 17, 2010 |
By: |
/s/ THOMAS J. AXON
|
|
|
|
Thomas J. Axon |
|
|
|
President
(Principal Executive Officer) |
|
May 17, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
By: |
/s/ PAUL D. COLASONO
|
|
|
|
Paul D. Colasono |
|
|
|
Executive Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer) |
|