|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name of Director
|
|
RSUs
|
|
|
Options
|
|
|
SARs()
|
|
|
Robert J. Allison, Jr.
|
|
|
7,000
|
|
|
|
69,400
|
|
|
|
|
|
Robert A. Day
|
|
|
3,000
|
|
|
|
100,000
|
|
|
|
26,224
|
|
Gerald J. Ford
|
|
|
3,000
|
|
|
|
100,000
|
|
|
|
26,224
|
|
H. Devon Graham, Jr.
|
|
|
8,000
|
|
|
|
47,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
Charles C. Krulak
|
|
|
3,500
|
|
|
|
35,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bobby Lee Lackey
|
|
|
3,500
|
|
|
|
35,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jon C. Madonna
|
|
|
3,500
|
|
|
|
35,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dustan E. McCoy
|
|
|
3,500
|
|
|
|
35,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
B. M. Rankin, Jr.
|
|
|
3,000
|
|
|
|
40,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stephen H. Siegele
|
|
|
3,000
|
|
|
|
40,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. Bennett Johnston
|
|
|
10,000
|
|
|
|
45,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gabrielle K. McDonald
|
|
|
3,000
|
|
|
|
47,500
|
|
|
|
4,917
|
|
J. Stapleton Roy
|
|
|
10,000
|
|
|
|
52,500
|
|
|
|
417
|
|
J. Taylor Wharton
|
|
|
7,500
|
|
|
|
72,500
|
|
|
|
8,195
|
|
() Reflects SARs awarded under our former director
compensation program.
|
|
|
(4) |
|
Amounts reflect the aggregate change in the actuarial present
value of each directors accumulated benefit under the
revised retirement plan as calculated in accordance with Item
402 of
Regulation S-K.
The following directors had a negative change in the actuarial
present value of the pension benefit as follows:
Messrs. Johnston $(4,928), Lackey $(1,584), Rankin $(5,864)
and Wharton $(1,584). A negative change in actuarial present
value of the pension benefit occurred in 2009 due to changes in
the discount rate and/or decreasing life expectancies when the
director continues to provide services past the normal
retirement date age of 65. As noted above, the director
retirement plan has been terminated for any future directors. |
|
(5) |
|
Includes (a) the companys match pursuant to the
matching gifts program, (b) consulting fees received in
connection with the consulting arrangements described under
Certain Transactions below, (c) interest
credited on dividend equivalents on unvested RSUs during 2009
and (d) the dollar value of life insurance premiums and the
related tax reimbursement paid by the company pursuant to an
arrangement assumed by the company in connection with its
acquisition of Phelps Dodge Corporation as follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credited
|
|
|
Life Insurance
|
|
|
|
Matching
|
|
|
Consulting
|
|
|
on Dividend
|
|
|
Premium and
|
|
Name of Director
|
|
Gifts
|
|
|
Fees
|
|
|
Equivalents
|
|
|
Tax Paid
|
|
|
Robert J. Allison, Jr.
|
|
$
|
40,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,876
|
|
|
|
|
|
Robert A. Day
|
|
|
30,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
398
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gerald J. Ford
|
|
|
40,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
398
|
|
|
|
|
|
H. Devon Graham, Jr.
|
|
|
4,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,490
|
|
|
|
|
|
Charles C. Krulak
|
|
|
40,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
214
|
|
|
$
|
813
|
|
Bobby Lee Lackey
|
|
|
4,600
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
407
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jon C. Madonna
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
214
|
|
|
|
870
|
|
Dustan E. McCoy
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
214
|
|
|
|
399
|
|
B. M. Rankin, Jr.
|
|
|
39,670
|
|
|
$
|
812,708
|
|
|
|
398
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stephen H. Siegele
|
|
|
10,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
314
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. Bennett Johnston
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
300,000
|
|
|
|
2,101
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gabrielle K. McDonald
|
|
|
6,000
|
|
|
|
300,000
|
|
|
|
398
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. Stapleton Roy
|
|
|
33,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,268
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. Taylor Wharton
|
|
|
3,500
|
|
|
|
400,000
|
|
|
|
1,411
|
|
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
(6) |
|
For Mr. Johnston and Ms. McDonald, the $75,000 annual
fee for serving on our board and for serving as a member of our
public policy committee is included in the consulting fees paid
to each of Mr. Johnston and Ms. McDonald, which are
reflected in the All Other Compensation column. |
|
(7) |
|
As described under Certain Transactions,
Mr. Roy is Vice Chairman of Kissinger Associates, Inc.,
which received $200,000 in 2009 from FM Services Company (the
Services Company), one of our wholly owned subsidiaries, for the
provision of consulting services. Because these fees are not
paid to Mr. Roy, we have not included them in this table. |
Election
of Directors
The terms of all of our directors expire at the 2010 annual
meeting of stockholders. In accordance with our by-laws, our
board of directors had previously fixed the number of directors
at sixteen. In accordance with our by-laws, our board of
directors has fixed the number of directors at twelve effective
June 9, 2010. Upon the recommendation of our nominating and
corporate governance committee, our board has nominated each of
Messrs. Adkerson, Allison, Day, Ford, Graham, Krulak,
Lackey, Madonna, McCoy, Moffett, Rankin and Siegele to serve a
one-year term commencing at the 2010 annual meeting and
continuing until the 2011 annual meeting or until their
successors are duly elected and qualified. The persons named as
proxies on the proxy card intend to vote your proxy for the
election of each such director, unless otherwise directed. If,
contrary to our expectations, a nominee should become
unavailable for any reason, your proxy will be voted for a
substitute nominee designated by our board, unless otherwise
directed.
Under our by-laws, in uncontested elections, directors are
elected by a majority of the votes cast. In contested elections
where the number of nominees exceeds the number of directors to
be elected, directors are elected by a plurality vote, with the
director nominees who receive the most votes being elected.
In an uncontested election, any nominee for director who has a
majority of votes cast withheld from his or her
election will be required to promptly tender his or her
resignation to the board. The nominating and corporate
governance committee will recommend to the board whether to
accept or reject the tendered resignation. The board will act on
the committees recommendation and publicly disclose its
decision within 90 days from the date of the annual meeting
of stockholders. Any director who tenders his or her resignation
will not participate in the committees recommendation or
the board action regarding whether to accept or reject the
tendered resignation.
In addition, if each member of the nominating and corporate
governance committee fails to be elected at the same election,
the independent directors who were elected will appoint a
committee to consider the tendered resignations and recommend to
the board whether to accept or reject them. Any vacancies in the
board may be filled by a majority of the directors then in
office. Each director elected in this manner will hold office
until his or her successor is elected and duly qualified.
Information
About Director Nominees
The following table provides certain information as of
April 13, 2010, with respect to each director nominee,
including information regarding the persons business
experience, director positions held currently or at any time
during the last five years, and the experiences, qualifications,
attributes or skills that caused the nominating and corporate
governance committee and the board to determine that the person
should be nominated at the 2010 annual meeting of stockholders
to serve as a director of the company. Unless otherwise
indicated, each person has been engaged in the principal
occupation shown for the past five years.
15
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year First
|
|
|
|
|
Principal Occupation, Business Experience, and
|
|
Elected a
|
Name of Director
|
|
Age
|
|
Other Directorships
|
|
Director
|
|
Richard C. Adkerson
|
|
63
|
|
Chief Executive Officer of the Company since December 2003.
President of the Company since January 2008 and from April 1997
to March 2007. Chief Financial Officer of the Company from
October 2000 to December 2003. Current Co-Chairman of the Board
of McMoRan Exploration Co. (McMoRan). President and Chief
Executive Officer of McMoRan from 1998 to 2004. Vice Chairman of
Freeport-McMoRan Inc. from 1995 to 1997. Chairman, Chief
Executive Officer & President of Stratus Properties
Inc. from 1992 to 1998. Partner and Managing Director of Arthur
Andersen & Co. from 1978 to 1989. Professional
Accounting Fellow with the Securities and Exchange Commission
and Presidential Exchange Executive from 1976 to 1978. Holds
B.S. and M.B.A. in Accounting from Mississippi State University
and completed Advanced Management Program at Harvard Business
School.
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mr. Adkerson is an experienced business leader making him
highly qualified to serve as a member of our board of directors.
As President and Chief Executive Officer, he is responsible for
the executive management of our company. He has demonstrated
exceptional leadership abilities in developing and executing a
financial strategy that has benefited our stockholders, and in
building an operational, financial and administrative
organization that efficiently supports our business.
Mr. Adkerson is recognized as a mining industry leader,
currently serving as Chairman of the International Council on
Mining and Metals and on the Executive Board of the
International Copper Association.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Robert J. Allison, Jr.
|
|
71
|
|
Director and Chairman Emeritus of Anadarko Petroleum
Corporation. Chairman of the Board of Anadarko Petroleum
Corporation from 1986 to 2005. President and Chief Executive
Officer of Anadarko Petroleum Corporation from 1979 to 2002 and
March 2003 to December 2003. Holds B.S. in Petroleum Engineering
from The University of Kansas.
|
|
2001
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mr. Allisons experience serving as the former
President and Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board
of one of the largest independent oil and gas exploration and
production companies in the world provides him with a wealth of
knowledge in dealing with operational, strategic, financial,
regulatory and international matters at the board level. His
business and board experience make him highly qualified to serve
as the chairman of our nominating and corporate governance
committee.
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year First
|
|
|
|
|
Principal Occupation, Business Experience, and
|
|
Elected a
|
Name of Director
|
|
Age
|
|
Other Directorships
|
|
Director
|
|
Robert A. Day
|
|
66
|
|
Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer and founder of
Trust Company of the West, an investment management company
and one of the largest independent trust companies in the U.S.
Chairman of the Board of TCW Group, a registered investment
management company. Chairman of Oakmont Corporation, a
registered investment advisor. Chairman, President and Chief
Executive Officer of W. M. Keck Foundation, a national
philanthropic organization. Holds B.S. in Economics from
Claremont McKenna College. Current director of McMoRan. Former
director of Fisher Scientific International, Syntroleum Corp.
and Société Générale.
|
|
1995
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mr. Day is an experienced entrepreneur and financial leader
with the skills necessary to serve on our board of directors and
to lead our audit committee. With his extensive experience in
the financial services industry, Mr. Day is well-versed in
accounting principles and financial reporting rules and
regulations, and is equipped to evaluate financial results and
generally oversee the financial reporting process of a large
corporation. Mr. Day brings significant business and
finance experience to our board and provides insight into
strategies and solutions to address an increasingly complex
business environment.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gerald J. Ford
|
|
65
|
|
Chairman of the Board of Diamond-A Ford Corp. from 1994 to
present. General Partner of Ford Financial Fund, L.P., a private
equity firm, from January 2010 to present. Chairman of the Board
and Chief Executive Officer of Golden State Bancorp, Inc. and
its wholly owned subsidiary, California Federal Bank, a Federal
Savings Bank, from 1998 through its 2002 merger with Citigroup
Inc. Chief Executive Officer of First Acceptance Corporation
from 1994 to 2002. Holds B.A. in Economics and J.D. from
Southern Methodist University. Current director of McMoRan,
First Acceptance Corporation, Hilltop Holdings Inc. and
Scientific Games Corporation. Former director of Liberté
Investors, Inc., Americredit Corp., and Affordable Residential
Communities.
|
|
2000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mr. Ford has been a financial institutions entrepreneur and
private investor involved in numerous mergers and acquisitions
of private and public sector financial institutions over the
past 30 years. His extensive banking industry experience
and educational background provide him with significant
knowledge in dealing with financial, accounting and regulatory
matters, making him a valuable member of our board of directors.
In addition, his service on the board of directors and audit and
corporate governance committees of a variety of public companies
gives him a deep understanding of the role of the board.
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year First
|
|
|
|
|
Principal Occupation, Business Experience, and
|
|
Elected a
|
Name of Director
|
|
Age
|
|
Other Directorships
|
|
Director
|
|
H. Devon Graham, Jr.
|
|
75
|
|
President of R. E. Smith Interests, an asset management company,
from 1997 to present. U.S. Regional Managing Partner, Arthur
Andersen & Co. from 1985 to 1997. Chairman of the
Board of Partners of Arthur Andersen & Co. from 1984
to 1986. Holds B.S. in Accounting from Mississippi State
University. Current director of McMoRan.
|
|
2000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mr. Grahams
41-year
career in public accounting with an international accounting
firm, where he served in various leadership positions, including
Chairman of the Board of Partners, member of the Worldwide
Executive Committee, U.S. Regional Managing Partner, member of
the U.S. Leadership Committee and Chairman of the Industry
Steering Committee, make him a valuable member of our board of
directors. In addition, his prior management experiences provide
him with the necessary skills to lead our corporate personnel
committee.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Charles C. Krulak
|
|
68
|
|
Former Commandant, United States Marine Corps, the Marine
Corps highest-ranking officer. Retired from United States
Marine Corps in 1999 after serving 35 years. Executive Vice
Chairman and Head of Mergers and Acquisitions of MBNA Corp., a
financial services company, from March 2004 to June 2005. Chief
Executive Officer of MBNA Europe from January 2001 to March
2004, and Senior Vice Chairman of MBNA America from 1999 to
2001. Holds B.S. in Engineering from U.S. Naval Academy and M.S.
in Labor Relations from George Washington University. Current
director of Union Pacific Corporation and the Aston Villa
Football Club, U.K. Former director of ConocoPhillips and Phelps
Dodge Corporation.
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As a retired Commandant of the United States Marine Corps,
General Krulak brings a unique perspective to our board. His
successful record of leadership and military service makes him
highly suited to understand and oversee the complex managerial,
strategic and international considerations addressed by our
board. General Krulaks service on the boards of other
public companies allows him to provide our board with a variety
of insights.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bobby Lee Lackey
|
|
72
|
|
Consultant. President and Chief Executive Officer of
McManus-Wyatt-Hidalgo Produce Marketing Co., shipper of fruits
and vegetables from 1998 to 2000. Chairman of the Board and
Chief Executive Officer of McManus Produce Co., Inc., McManus
Cotton Gin, Inc. and McManus Ice Co., Inc. from 1968 to 1998.
Former President of Texas Citrus and Vegetable
Growers & Shippers Association. Attended The
University of Texas at Austin.
|
|
1995
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mr. Lackeys
40-year
career in the agricultural business where he served in various
leadership positions, including President and Chief Executive
Officer, makes him a valuable member of our board of directors.
This experience provides him with a broad understanding of the
operational, financial and strategic issues facing our company.
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year First
|
|
|
|
|
Principal Occupation, Business Experience, and
|
|
Elected a
|
Name of Director
|
|
Age
|
|
Other Directorships
|
|
Director
|
|
Jon C. Madonna
|
|
66
|
|
Retired Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of KPMG, an
international accounting and consulting firm. Retired from KPMG
in 1996 having held numerous senior leadership positions
throughout his
28-year
career. Chairman of DigitalThink, Inc. from April 2002 to May
2004 and Chief Executive Officer of DigitalThink, Inc. from 2001
to 2002. President and Chief Executive Officer of Carlson
Wagonlit Corporate Travel, Inc. from 1999 to 2000 and Vice
Chairman of Travelers Group, Inc. from 1997 to 1998. Holds B.S.
in Accounting from The University of San Francisco. Current
director of AT&T Inc. and Tidewater Inc. Former director of
Albertsons, Inc., Visa Inc., Jazz Technologies, Inc. and
Phelps Dodge Corporation.
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mr. Madonnas long career in public accounting with an
international accounting firm and his service as an executive
and a director for several publicly traded companies provides
him with extensive experience in dealing with financial,
accounting and regulatory matters at the board level and gives
him a deep understanding of the role of the board and
expectations of our directors. In addition, his service on the
audit and nominating committees of public companies in a variety
of industries positions him well to serve as a member of our
audit committee and to provide insights into strategies and
solutions to address the challenges of our business.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dustan E. McCoy
|
|
60
|
|
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer since December 2005 of
Brunswick Corporation, a leading, publicly traded, global
manufacturer and marketer of recreation products including
marine engines, boats, fitness equipment and bowling and
billiards equipment. President of the Brunswick Boat Group from
2000 until 2005. Joined Brunswick in 1999 as Vice President,
General Counsel and Corporate Secretary. Prior to joining
Brunswick, served as Executive Vice President for Witco
Corporation, a publicly traded specialty chemical products
company, with operating responsibility for a variety of global
businesses and functions and served as Senior Vice President,
General Counsel and Corporate Secretary. Holds B.S. in Political
Science from Eastern Kentucky University and J.D. in Law from
Salmon P. Chase College of Law. Current director of
Louisiana-Pacific Corporation. Former director of Phelps Dodge
Corporation.
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mr. McCoys experience serving as Chairman and Chief
Executive Officer of a large, global publicly traded company
provides him with a broad understanding of the operational,
financial and strategic issues facing our company. In addition,
his experience and qualifications as a general counsel enable
him to provide insight in addressing legal and regulatory
matters.
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year First
|
|
|
|
|
Principal Occupation, Business Experience, and
|
|
Elected a
|
Name of Director
|
|
Age
|
|
Other Directorships
|
|
Director
|
|
James R. Moffett
|
|
71
|
|
Chairman of the Board of the Company from 1992 to present. Chief
Executive Officer of the Company from 1995 to 2003. Co-Chairman
of the Board of McMoRan. Received Horatio Alger Association of
Distinguished Americans Award in 1990. Received Norman Vincent
Peale Award in 2000 for exceptional humanitarian contributions
to society. Holds B.S. with special honors in Geology from The
University of Texas at Austin and M.S. in Geology from Tulane
University.
|
|
1992
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mr. Moffett, one of the founders of our company, has
extensive expertise as a practicing geologist and with respect
to our business operations, making him uniquely qualified to
lead our board. In 1969, he and two associates founded McMoRan
Oil & Gas Co., which developed into one of
Americas leading independent oil and gas companies. In
1981, Mr. Moffett led the effort to merge McMoRan
Oil & Gas Co. and Freeport Minerals Company. The
merger resulted in the establishment of a new company,
Freeport-McMoRan Inc., our former parent company, which became
one of the worlds leading natural resource companies of
which he served as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer from
1984 until 1997 when it was acquired. Through his leadership and
skill as a geologist, Mr. Moffett has guided our growth
through significant discoveries of metal reserves and the
development of our mines, milling facilities and infrastructure.
As executive chairman, he continues to further our business
strategy by applying his exceptional talents and experience as a
geologist. He directs our global exploration programs and
continues to be instrumental in fostering our relationship with
the government of Indonesia, the location of our Grasberg mine.
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year First
|
|
|
|
|
Principal Occupation, Business Experience, and
|
|
Elected a
|
Name of Director
|
|
Age
|
|
Other Directorships
|
|
Director
|
|
B. M. Rankin, Jr.
|
|
80
|
|
Private investor. Vice Chairman of the Board of the Company from
2001 to present. Current Vice Chairman of the Board of McMoRan.
Chairman of U.S. Oil and Gas Association from 2008 to 2010.
McCombs School of Business, The University of Texas at Austin
Hall of Fame, 2006. Hunt Oil Company 1955 to 1967. Holds B.B.A.
from The University of Texas at Austin. Former director of Texas
Mid-Continent Oil and Gas Association.
|
|
1995
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mr. Rankin is one of the founders of our company and has
more than 50 years of experience in the natural resources
industry. In 1969, along with Mr. Moffett and another
associate, he founded McMoRan Oil & Gas Co., which
developed into one of Americas leading independent oil and
gas companies. In 1981, McMoRan Oil & Gas Co. and
Freeport Minerals Company merged, resulting in the establishment
of one of the worlds leading natural resource companies,
Freeport-McMoRan Inc., our former parent company. As a founder,
he has a comprehensive understanding of our company and its
management, operations and financial requirements. With his
detailed knowledge of our business and his perspectives
regarding strategic and operational opportunities and challenges
facing us, he continues to provide valuable insight to our board
of directors.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stephen H. Siegele
|
|
50
|
|
Private investor. Founder and Chief Executive of Advanced
Delivery & Chemical Systems, Inc. (ADCS), a worldwide
leader in advanced chemicals and delivery hardware serving
markets in Asia, Europe and the U.S., from 1988 to 1997. In
1997, ADCS merged with Advanced Technology Materials, Inc., a
public company, where Mr. Siegele became a divisional
president and Vice Chairman of the Board of Directors until his
retirement in 2000. He then founded Fluorine On Call, Ltd., a
private company that designs and manufactures high purity
fluorine generators. Mr. Siegele retired from Fluorine On
Call, Ltd. in April 2006. Holds B.S. in Chemical Engineering
from the University of
Wisconsin-Madison,
and is an inventor of numerous U.S. patents.
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mr. Siegele has extensive experience as an entrepreneur and
inventor within the semiconductor, microelectronics and chemical
industries, and as a director and senior manager of public and
private companies. These experiences provide him with a strong
background in addressing the strategic, operational, financial
and technical matters presented to our board, and make him
highly qualified to serve as chairman of our public policy
committee.
|
|
|
21
Stock
Ownership of Directors and Executive Officers
We believe that it is important for our directors and executive
officers to align their interests with the long-term interests
of stockholders. We encourage stock accumulation through the
grant of equity incentives to our directors and executive
officers and through our stock ownership guidelines applicable
to our directors and executive officers.
Except as otherwise indicated below, this table shows the amount
of our common stock each of our directors and named executive
officers beneficially owned as of the record date,
April 13, 2010. Unless otherwise indicated, (a) the
persons shown below do not beneficially own any of our preferred
stock, and (b) all shares shown are held with sole voting
and investment power.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
Shares Subject
|
|
Total Number
|
|
|
|
|
Shares Not
|
|
to Exercisable
|
|
of Shares
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
Subject to
|
|
Options and
|
|
Beneficially
|
|
of
|
Name of Beneficial Owner
|
|
Options
|
|
Vesting of RSUs(1)
|
|
Owned(2)
|
|
Class(3)
|
|
Richard C. Adkerson(4)
|
|
|
913,165
|
|
|
|
1,500,000
|
|
|
|
2,413,165
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Robert J. Allison, Jr.(5)
|
|
|
65,553
|
|
|
|
59,900
|
|
|
|
125,453
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Michael J. Arnold(6)
|
|
|
66,882
|
|
|
|
348,750
|
|
|
|
415,632
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Robert A. Day(7)
|
|
|
633,000
|
|
|
|
86,500
|
|
|
|
719,500
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Gerald J. Ford
|
|
|
23,291
|
|
|
|
86,500
|
|
|
|
109,791
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
H. Devon Graham, Jr.
|
|
|
4,000
|
|
|
|
39,000
|
|
|
|
43,000
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
J. Bennett Johnston
|
|
|
65,647
|
|
|
|
38,500
|
|
|
|
104,147
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Charles C. Krulak
|
|
|
1,750
|
|
|
|
20,250
|
|
|
|
22,000
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Bobby Lee Lackey
|
|
|
6,921
|
|
|
|
22,000
|
|
|
|
28,921
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Jon C. Madonna
|
|
|
5,090
|
|
|
|
20,250
|
|
|
|
25,340
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Dustan E. McCoy
|
|
|
1,750
|
|
|
|
20,250
|
|
|
|
22,000
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Gabrielle K. McDonald
|
|
|
9,513
|
|
|
|
34,000
|
|
|
|
43,513
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
James R. Moffett(8)
|
|
|
1,609,078
|
|
|
|
750,000
|
|
|
|
2,359,078
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Kathleen L. Quirk
|
|
|
92,939
|
|
|
|
643,250
|
|
|
|
736,189
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
B. M. Rankin, Jr.(9)
|
|
|
486,500
|
|
|
|
26,500
|
|
|
|
513,000
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
J. Stapleton Roy
|
|
|
21,941
|
|
|
|
46,000
|
|
|
|
67,941
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Stephen H. Siegele(10)
|
|
|
108,583
|
|
|
|
23,500
|
|
|
|
132,083
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
J. Taylor Wharton(11)
|
|
|
45,734
|
|
|
|
63,500
|
|
|
|
109,234
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Directors, named executive officers and executive officers as a
group (18 persons)
|
|
|
4,161,337
|
|
|
|
3,828,650
|
|
|
|
7,989,987
|
|
|
|
1.8
|
%
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Ownership is less than 1% |
|
(1) |
|
Reflects our common stock that could be acquired within sixty
days of the record date upon the exercise of options, the
vesting of RSUs granted pursuant to our stock incentive plans
and the termination of deferrals on previously vested RSUs. |
22
|
|
|
(2) |
|
In addition to the RSUs included in Number of
Shares Subject to Exercisable Options and Vesting of
RSUs, each beneficial owner holds the following unvested
RSUs, which are not included in the table above: |
|
|
|
|
|
Name of Beneficial Owner
|
|
Number of RSUs (1)
|
|
Richard C. Adkerson
|
|
|
352,897
|
|
Robert J. Allison, Jr.
|
|
|
3,500
|
|
Michael J. Arnold
|
|
|
34,050
|
|
Robert A. Day
|
|
|
3,500
|
|
Gerald J. Ford
|
|
|
3,500
|
|
H. Devon Graham, Jr.
|
|
|
3,500
|
|
J. Bennett Johnston
|
|
|
3,500
|
|
Charles C. Krulak
|
|
|
3,750
|
|
Bobby Lee Lackey
|
|
|
3,500
|
|
Jon C. Madonna
|
|
|
3,750
|
|
Dustan E. McCoy
|
|
|
3,750
|
|
Gabrielle K. McDonald
|
|
|
3,500
|
|
James R. Moffett
|
|
|
138,079
|
|
Kathleen L. Quirk
|
|
|
71,105
|
|
B. M. Rankin, Jr.
|
|
|
3,500
|
|
J. Stapleton Roy
|
|
|
3,500
|
|
Stephen H. Siegele
|
|
|
4,000
|
|
J. Taylor Wharton
|
|
|
3,500
|
|
(1) Includes the 2,000 common stock restricted stock units
received by non-management directors in December 2009, subject
to stockholder approval of the Amended and Restated 2006 Stock
Incentive Plan at the annual meeting.
|
|
|
|
|
For more information regarding the RSUs, see the sections titled
Director Compensation, Compensation Discussion
and Analysis and Executive Officer
Compensation Grants of Plan Based Awards. |
|
(3) |
|
Based on 431,576,428 shares of our common stock outstanding
as of April 13, 2010. |
|
(4) |
|
Includes 8,248 shares of our common stock held in his
individual retirement account (IRA). Mr. Adkerson has
entered into a forward sale contract with a securities broker
pursuant to which he agreed to sell up to 250,000 shares of
common stock on August 6, 2011, with the exact number of
shares to be delivered on the maturity date determined by the
closing price on such date. Mr. Adkerson may elect to
settle the contract in cash and retain ownership of the shares.
Mr. Adkerson has pledged 250,000 shares to secure his
obligations under this contract but continues to hold beneficial
ownership and voting power with respect to the
250,000 shares. In addition, Mr. Adkerson has pledged
434,691 shares of our common stock to secure a line of
credit. |
|
(5) |
|
Includes 29,622 shares of our common stock held by
Mr. Allison through a Grantor Retained Annuity Trust (GRAT)
and 29,622 shares of our common stock held by
Mr. Allisons spouse through a GRAT. |
|
(6) |
|
Includes 2,459 shares of our common stock held in our
Employee Capital Accumulation Program (ECAP). |
|
(7) |
|
Includes 21,000 shares of our common stock held by his
spouse, as to which he disclaims beneficial ownership. |
|
(8) |
|
Includes (a) 1,575,441 shares of our common stock held
by a limited liability company with respect to which
Mr. Moffett, as a member, shares voting and investment
power, (b) 26,085 shares of our common stock held in
our ECAP and (c) 7,552 shares of our common stock held
by his spouse, as to which he disclaims beneficial ownership.
The limited liability company through which Mr. Moffett
owns his shares |
23
|
|
|
|
|
has entered into four forward sale contracts with a securities
broker pursuant to which the limited liability company agreed to
sell: (a) 300,000 shares of common stock on
September 5, 2012, 85,799 shares of common stock on
March 15, 2013, and 150,000 shares of common stock on
November 3, 2014, with the sale price to be determined and
paid on the respective maturity dates, and (b) up to
750,000 shares on November 3, 2014 with exact number
of shares to be delivered on the maturity date determined by the
closing price on such date, and in exchange for which the
limited liability company received a payment upon execution of
the contract. Under all four contracts, the limited liability
company may elect to settle the contract in cash and retain
ownership of the shares. The limited liability company has
pledged a total of 1,285,799 shares in part to secure its
obligations under these contracts but continues to hold
beneficial ownership, voting power and the right to receive
quarterly dividend payments of up to $0.3125 per share with
respect to 385,799 of the shares. |
|
(9) |
|
Of the shares shown, 450,000 are held by a limited partnership
in which Mr. Rankin is the sole shareholder of the sole
general partner. The limited partnership through which
Mr. Rankin owns his shares has entered into two contracts
with a securities broker pursuant to which the limited
partnership agreed to sell shares of our common stock, which
contracts are described as follows: (a) a prepaid forward
sale contract relating to 200,000 shares pursuant to which
the limited partnership received a payment upon execution of the
agreement, and the exact number of shares to be delivered on the
settlement date, August 11, 2010, will be determined by the
closing price on such date, and (b) a range forward sale
contract pursuant to which the limited partnership agreed to
sell 100,000 shares on March 3, 2011, with the sale
price to be determined and paid on the maturity date, and under
which the limited partnership may elect to settle the contract
in cash and retain ownership of the shares. The limited
partnership has pledged a total of 300,000 shares to secure
its obligations under these contracts but continues to hold
beneficial ownership, voting power and the right to receive
quarterly dividend payments of up to $0.15 per share with
respect to 100,000 shares and quarterly contractual
dividend payments of $0.25 subject to certain broker adjustments
with respect to 200,000 shares. |
|
(10) |
|
Includes 41,148 shares issuable upon conversion of
30,000 shares of our
63/4%
Mandatory Convertible Preferred Stock. |
|
(11) |
|
Includes (a) 26,937 shares of our common stock held by
Mr. Whartons spouse, (b) 160 shares of our
common stock held in an IRA for Mr. Whartons spouse,
(c) 420 shares of our common stock held in his IRA,
and (d) 5,089 shares of our common stock held by
Mr. Wharton as custodian for his daughter. |
Section 16(a)
Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance
Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended, requires our directors and executive officers and
persons who own more than 10% of our common stock to file
reports of ownership and changes in ownership with the SEC.
Based solely upon our review of the Forms 3, 4 and 5 filed
during 2009, and written representations from certain reporting
persons that no Forms 5 were required, we believe that all
required reports were timely filed.
Stock
Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners
Based on filings with the SEC, this table shows the owner of
more than 5% of our outstanding common stock as of
December 31, 2009. Unless otherwise indicated, all
information is presented as of December 31, 2009, and all
shares beneficially owned are held with sole voting and
investment power.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent of
|
|
|
Number of Shares
|
|
Outstanding
|
Name and Address of Beneficial Owner
|
|
Beneficially Owned
|
|
Shares(1)
|
|
BlackRock, Inc.
|
|
|
32,706,404
|
(2)
|
|
|
7.6
|
%
|
40 East 52nd Street New York, NY 10022
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Based on 430,151,500 shares of our common stock outstanding
as of December 31, 2009. |
|
(2) |
|
Based on a Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on
January 29, 2010 by BlackRock, Inc. on its own behalf and
on behalf of its subsidiaries identified therein. |
24
Executive
Officer Compensation
Compensation
Discussion and Analysis
Overview
This Compensation Discussion and Analysis is designed to provide
our stockholders with an understanding of our compensation
philosophy and objectives, as well as the analysis that we
performed in setting executive compensation. It discusses the
corporate personnel committees (the committee)
determination of how and why, in addition to what, compensation
actions were taken for the executive officers who are identified
in the Summary Compensation Table below (the named
executive officers).
The committee determines the compensation of our executive
officers and administers our annual incentive and stock
incentive plans. Our companys executive compensation
philosophy is to:
|
|
|
|
|
pay for performance by emphasizing performance-based
compensation that balances rewards for both short- and long-term
results and provides our executives with high reward
opportunities for high corporate performance,
|
|
|
|
tie compensation to the interests of stockholders, and
|
|
|
|
provide a competitive level of compensation that will attract
and retain talented executives.
|
Redesign
of Executive Compensation Program
Throughout 2008 and continuing into 2009, the committee worked
extensively with its executive compensation consultant, to
evaluate our executive compensation program in light of internal
and external developments. Our acquisition of Phelps Dodge in
March 2007 expanded our company in scope and size and
transformed our company into a global leader in the copper
industry. The committee recognized that the companys
increased production capabilities following the transaction
could result in significantly larger funding pools under our
annual incentive plan, or AIP. In addition to these internal
changes, the weak global economic conditions and the sharp
decline in commodity prices during the second half of 2008
caused us to undertake a series of actions designed to be
responsive to the weak economic environment while preserving
resources and growth opportunities for the longer term. These
actions included reductions in capital spending, adjustments to
our operating plans to reduce production of high cost volumes,
revisions to our financial policy to conserve cash and protect
liquidity, and other significant cost cutting measures.
In response to these internal and external developments, during
2008 and early 2009 the committee took the following actions in
restructuring the companys executive compensation program:
|
|
|
|
|
Proposed a redesigned annual incentive plan, which was approved
by our stockholders in 2009. See Annual Incentive
Awards for more information.
|
|
|
|
Eliminated the elective restricted stock unit program, which
permitted our executive officers and other employees to elect to
receive restricted stock units at a 50% premium in lieu of some
or all of their annual cash incentive award.
|
|
|
|
Revised our option grant policy for executives to provide annual
grants rather than grants once every three years.
|
|
|
|
Terminated our long-term performance incentive plan.
|
|
|
|
Adopted a policy pursuant to which the company will no longer
provide excise tax
gross-up
protections in change of control arrangements adopted, renewed
or extended after December 2, 2008.
|
|
|
|
Revised our executive perquisite program to eliminate all tax
gross-ups on
perquisites and all club dues.
|
25
2009
Company Performance Highlights
We are one of the worlds largest copper, gold and
molybdenum mining companies in terms of reserves and production,
with a portfolio of assets located in geographically diverse
regions of the world. As noted above, the dramatic decline in
commodity prices in late 2008 and the deterioration of the
economic and credit environment limited our ability to invest in
growth projects and required us to make adjustments to our
near-term plans in late 2008 and early 2009. Management
responded promptly and decisively to offset the impact of low
copper and molybdenum prices, to strengthen our financial
position and to preserve our future growth options. As a result,
we were able to achieve extraordinary operational and financial
accomplishments during 2009, including the following:
|
|
|
|
Ø
|
Successful implementation of our revised operating plans under
volatile conditions
|
|
|
Ø
|
Sales for both copper and gold exceeded targets
|
|
|
|
|
o
|
4.1 billion pounds of copper (target: 3.9 billion
pounds)
|
|
|
o
|
2.6 million ounces of gold (target: 2.2 million ounces)
|
|
|
|
|
Ø
|
Positive safety performance total reportable rate
more than 30% below target
|
|
|
Ø
|
Significant reductions in our cost structure, particularly in
North America where unit site production and delivery costs were
reduced by 34% from 2008 ($1.25 per pound of copper for 2009
versus $1.88 per pound of copper for 2008)
|
|
|
Ø
|
Positive exploration results resulting in net reserve additions
on a consolidated basis of
|
|
|
|
|
o
|
6.3 billion pounds of copper replacing approximately 150%
of 2009 copper production
|
|
|
o
|
164 million pounds of molybdenum replacing approximately
300% of 2009 molybdenum production
|
|
|
|
|
Ø
|
Successful
start-up of
Tenke Fungurume operations
|
|
|
|
|
o
|
Achieved design production rates for copper; continued to
address start up of cobalt production
|
|
|
o
|
Based on the 10-year average of current design operations, the
initial phase will produce aggregate annual metal of
250 million pounds of copper and 18 million pounds of
cobalt
|
|
|
|
|
Ø
|
Effective management of challenging security issues at PT
Freeport Indonesias operations
|
|
|
Ø
|
Maintenance of future growth opportunities
|
|
|
|
|
o
|
North America positioned to initiate restart
activities at curtailed operations as market conditions improve;
continued exploration and studies for future expansion at North
American sites; acquired Twin Buttes to enhance options in the
Sierrita district; maintained Climax primary molybdenum
development opportunity to resume construction rapidly as market
conditions warrant
|
|
|
o
|
South America resumed construction activities for
development of a large sulfide ore deposit at El Abra; commenced
project to optimize throughput at the existing Cerro Verde
concentrator operations; continued studies for major mill
projects at Cerro Verde and El Abra
|
|
|
o
|
Indonesia continued development of the large-scale,
high-grade underground ore bodies at Grasberg
|
|
|
o
|
Africa continued exploration activities for long
range planning; initiated feasibility study for second phase
expansion
|
|
|
|
|
Ø
|
Strong stock performance
|
|
|
|
|
o
|
229% increase in common stock price
|
|
|
o
|
Top performing metal & mining company and top ten
performer in S&P 500
|
|
|
|
|
Ø
|
Enhanced financial and liquidity position
|
|
|
|
|
o
|
Repaid $1 billion in debt during the year
|
|
|
o
|
Successfully completed $750 million public offering of
common stock in the first quarter of 2009
|
|
|
|
|
Ø
|
Reinstatement of annual cash dividends to stockholders at $0.60
per share
|
26
Compensation
Philosophy and Processes
Role of Advisors. Since 2004, the
committee has required that its compensation consultant be
independent of the companys management. From August 2007
until February 2010, the committee retained Towers Perrin (now
Towers Watson) as its executive compensation consultant. As a
condition of its engagement, Towers Perrin agreed that it would
not provide any services to the companys management.
During 2008 and 2009, Towers Perrin provided information and
advice regarding the restructuring of the companys
executive compensation program as discussed above. In early
2010, the principal individual that has provided executive
compensation consulting services to the committee for the last
three years departed from Towers Watson and formed a new firm,
Pay Governance LLC. The committee elected to engage Pay
Governance as its new independent executive compensation
consultant in February 2010. Consistent with the
committees longstanding policy, Pay Governance will not
provide any services to the companys management.
The committee also consults with our executive chairman and our
chief executive officer regarding compensation decisions
affecting our other executive officers.
Executive Chairman and Chief Executive
Officer. We recognize that the level of
compensation paid to our chairman and our chief executive
officer is significantly greater than that paid to our other
executive officers. The compensation levels of
Messrs. Moffett and Adkerson reflect our view that their
management of the organization provides the basis for the
company to achieve success and reflects the value that we place
on the quality of their leadership and capabilities. This
disparity also has some basis in seniority. Messrs. Moffett
and Adkerson each impart extraordinary value to our company,
each bringing to their partnership a set of
complementary skills. We believe their respective compensation
arrangements recognize those skills and their contributions to
the success of our company.
Mr. Moffett has been at the helm of our company since its
formation and has guided our growth through significant
discoveries of metal reserves using his skill as a geologist. He
also led the development of our Grasberg mine, milling
facilities and infrastructure. As executive chairman,
Mr. Moffett continues to further our business strategy by
applying his exceptional talents, which has created substantial
value for our company. He directs our global exploration
programs and also continues to be instrumental in fostering our
relationship with the government of Indonesia, the location of
our Grasberg mine.
Mr. Adkerson, as president and chief executive officer, is
responsible for the executive management of our company.
Mr. Adkerson has demonstrated outstanding leadership
abilities in developing and executing a business and financial
strategy that is positive for our stockholders, and in building
an operational, financial and administrative organization that
efficiently supports our business through various economic
cycles. Mr. Adkerson has provided strong leadership and
sound judgment in our efforts to respond aggressively to
economic circumstances.
Setting Compensation Levels. Although
objective criteria are reviewed, the committee does not apply
hard metrics to decisions regarding executive
compensation. We have a small group of executive officers, and
the committees decisions regarding salary levels and grant
amounts (in the form of equity awards and percentage allocations
under the annual incentive plan) reflect the committees
views as to the broad scope of responsibilities of our executive
officers and the committees subjective assessment of their
individual impact on the companys overall success.
Stock Ownership. We believe that it is
important for our executive officers to align their interests
with the long-term interests of our stockholders. With that
philosophy in mind, we have structured our current and past
compensation programs to ensure that a portion of our executive
officers compensation is delivered in a form of equity,
such as stock options and restricted stock units. Under our
redesigned executive compensation program, our executive
officers will receive annual grants of stock options
and/or
restricted stock units, and our new annual incentive plan
requires that award amounts in excess of four times an
executives base salary must be paid in an equivalent
number of restricted stock units.
In 2006, the committee adopted stock ownership guidelines
applicable to our executive officers. For purposes of the
guidelines, the stock value is calculated annually, determined
by reference to either the one-year or five-year trailing
average monthly stock price. Shares of common stock currently
owned by the
27
executive officers are counted for purposes of the stock
ownership guidelines, as are shares held in employee benefit
plans, individual retirement accounts, shares issuable upon the
vesting of outstanding restricted stock units, shares issuable
upon conversion of mandatory convertible preferred stock and
shares held in certain trusts. Under the guidelines, each of
Messrs. Moffett and Adkerson is required to maintain
ownership of company stock valued at five times his base salary,
and our other executive officers are required to maintain
ownership of company stock valued at three times their base
salaries. As of December 31, 2009, all of our executive
officers had exceeded their target ownership level. In
particular, Mr. Moffett owned shares valued at 36 times his
base salary (approximately seven times his target ownership
level) and Mr. Adkerson owned shares valued at 29 times his
base salary (approximately six times his target ownership
level). These levels reflect their individual commitments to
aligning their interests with those of the stockholders and
provide an incentive to maximize the value of our stock over the
long term. For more information regarding the current stock
holdings of our executive officers, please see Stock
Ownership of Directors and Executive Officers.
Consideration of Stock Option Exercises and RSU
Vestings. The committee does not factor into
its decisions regarding executive compensation the gains
received by our executive officers in connection with the
vesting of restricted stock units or the exercise of stock
options. The value an executive receives from a stock option
exercise is directly related to the appreciation in value of our
common stock, which in turn we believe is directly affected by
the efforts of our executive officers in managing our company.
In addition, many of the restricted stock units received by our
executive officers, in particular Mr. Adkerson, were
voluntarily received in lieu of cash compensation previously
earned under our annual bonus plan in connection with our former
elective restricted stock program. Because the executives
undertook a risk when electing to participate in the program, we
believe it would be inappropriate to allow the value of the
award at vesting to affect future compensation decisions.
Although the elective restricted stock program has been
discontinued, our new annual incentive plan requires that a
portion of each executives annual bonus be paid in
restricted stock units that will continue to be subject to a
performance condition for three years. Further, a key purpose
behind granting equity awards to executives is to provide an
incentive for them to increase stockholder value over time.
Accordingly, the committee has not taken realized option gains
into account when making decisions regarding future
compensation, nor did it revise its compensation or grant
practices during years when our executives did not exercise any
stock options.
Overview
of Principal Components of Executive Compensation
The principal components of executive officer compensation for
2009 were base salaries, annual incentive awards, and long-term
incentive awards, the sum of which are viewed by the committee
as the executives total direct compensation.
In addition, we also provide our executives with certain
personal benefits and perquisites, as well as post-employment
compensation, which the committee considers separately from
total direct compensation and which are further described below.
|
|
|
Principal Components of
|
|
|
Compensation
|
|
Summary and Purpose of the Component
|
|
Base Salaries
|
|
Base salaries provide fixed compensation to our executives. Each
executive officers base salary is based on his or her
level of responsibility. Pursuant to their employment
agreements, the base salary of Mr. Moffett is contractually set
through December 31, 2010, and the base salaries of Mr. Adkerson
and Ms. Quirk are contractually set through January 1, 2012.
|
|
|
|
Annual Incentive Awards
|
|
Annual cash incentives payable under our annual incentive plan
(AIP) are a variable component of compensation designed to
reward our executives for maximizing annual operating
performance, including safety performance. The aggregate plan
funding amount for the annual cash awards is based on our net
cash provided by operating activities, which we believe is a
significant measure of our companys success.
|
28
|
|
|
Principal Components of
|
|
|
Compensation
|
|
Summary and Purpose of the Component
|
|
Long-Term Incentive Awards
|
|
Long-term incentives are also a variable component of
compensation intended to reward our executives for the
companys success in achieving sustained, long-term
profitability and increases in stock value. We provide
long-term incentive awards in the form of performance-based
restricted stock units and stock options, which provide a focus
on stock price performance and encourage executive ownership of
our stock.
|
After reviewing the Companys significant compensation
programs, management and the committee believe that the risks
arising from our compensation policies and practices for our
employees, including our executive officers, are not reasonably
likely to have a material adverse effect on the company. In
reaching this conclusion, we have taken into account the purpose
and structure of these programs and the following design
elements of our compensation programs and policies: our balance
of annual and long-term compensation elements at the executive
and management levels; our use of operating cash flow as a
performance metric for executives and management level
employees, which we believe accurately reflects our performance;
the multi-year vesting of equity awards that promotes focus on
the long-term operational and financial performance of our
company, and bonus arrangements for most employees that are not
guaranteed and are ultimately at the discretion of either the
committee (for our executive officers and senior management) or
senior management (for other employees). These features, as well
as the stock ownership requirements for our executive officers,
result in a compensation program that aligns our
executives interests with those of our stockholders and
does not promote excessive risk-taking on the part of our
executives or other employees.
The following is an explanation of each principal component of
our executive compensation program. The discussion includes both
a description of the committees compensation decisions for
2009 and, where applicable, a description of changes made during
2009.
Base
Salaries
Our philosophy is that base salaries should meet the objective
of attracting and retaining the executive officers needed to
manage our business successfully. Actual individual salary
amounts reflect the committees judgment with respect to
each executive officers responsibility, performance, work
experience and the individuals historical salary level.
Our goal is to allocate more compensation to the
performance-dependent elements of the total compensation
package, and we do not routinely provide base salary increases.
Consequently, we have not increased the base salaries of our
executive officers since May 2007, when increases to the base
salaries of certain executive officers were approved to address
the increased responsibilities of these executives following our
acquisition of Phelps Dodge. The base salaries of
Messrs. Moffett and Adkerson and Ms. Quirk are
contractually set pursuant to their employment agreements.
Annual
Incentive Awards
Our annual incentive plan, or AIP, is designed to provide
performance-based awards to our executive officers, each of
whose performance has a significant impact on our financial
stability, profitability and future growth. The AIP in effect
for 2009 was approved by our stockholders in 2005. We acquired
Phelps Dodge in 2007, which resulted in additional operating
cash flow for our company. Following the acquisition, the
committee re-evaluated the design of the AIP in light of our
substantial growth, and concluded that the overall design of the
AIP is appropriate for the following reasons:
|
|
|
|
|
its design supports the entrepreneurial spirit of the
organization;
|
|
|
|
its focus on operating cash flow, the underlying metric of the
plan, reflects our goal to maximize cash flows and long-term
values for our stockholders; and
|
|
|
|
our view that the variability of cash flows associated with
changes in commodity prices, changes in production volumes, cost
management and other changes in business conditions closely
aligns management and stockholder interests.
|
29
The committee recognized, however, that the design could
generate large funding pools and corresponding large payouts to
our executives because of the companys increased
production capabilities, especially during years when commodity
prices are high, as was the case in 2007. To address these
concerns, the committee, working with its compensation
consultant, proposed a new annual incentive plan, which was
approved by our stockholders in 2009 and which will be effective
for fiscal year 2010 and beyond. The new plan is summarized
below.
New 2009 Annual Incentive Plan. A key
objective of restructuring the executive compensation program,
including revising the AIP, was to establish compensation
opportunities that reflect the performance of the business,
which may vary significantly from year to year, and that are
consistent with observed market pay levels. In developing the
new AIP, the committee retained the use of operating cash flow
as the financial measure used to fund the AIP pool, but revised
the definition to specifically exclude working capital changes.
This decision reflects our belief that operating cash flow is a
meaningful indicator of overall company performance. In
establishing the funding level for the restructured AIP, the
committee considered the reported 25th and
90th percentile statistics from Towers Perrins
general industry compensation survey as indicative of the
observed range of market pay levels for total direct
compensation (salary + target annual incentives + grant value of
long-term incentives). This information was a consideration in
determining the new AIP funding level but was not the sole
factor used to determine that level. The committee also
evaluated various operating cash flow scenarios and compared
potential payouts to the observed range of market practice.
The new AIP is similar in design to the current AIP, but
contains the following provisions designed to limit potential
payments under the plan in order to ensure that the compensation
opportunities are consistent with observed market practice:
|
|
|
|
|
the plan funding pool will be 0.625% of operating cash flow
instead of 2.5%;
|
|
|
|
payments to executives under the plan may not exceed eight times
the executives base salary; and
|
|
|
|
any payments over four times the executives base salary
will be made in restricted stock units having an equivalent
value, the vesting of which will be subject to our continued
achievement of the 6% return on investment threshold, thus
converting a portion of the annual award to a long-term
incentive dependent upon the companys continued
performance.
|
Both the new plan and the current plan are designed to meet the
requirements of Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code
by setting an objective performance target and a maximum funding
amount. Under both plans, once the performance target has been
achieved, the committee retains the discretion to reduce or
eliminate the award pool and the awards to specific officers.
Accordingly, this plan design preserves the companys tax
treatment of these awards as performance-based under
Section 162(m), but gives the committee flexibility in
operating the plan. The new plan also specifically enumerates
qualitative factors that the committee may consider in
exercising this discretion, including total shareholder return
and safety performance.
2009 Awards under the AIP. In February 2009,
we assigned each of our executive officers a percentage of the
aggregate plan funding amount under the AIP for 2009; 40% to
each of Messrs. Moffett and Adkerson, 11% to Ms. Quirk
and 9% to Mr. Arnold. These allocations were based on each
officers position and were adjusted from the allocations
made in prior years as part of the new executive compensation
program.
Under the AIP in effect for 2009, if our five-year return on
investment was 6% or greater, our executive officers would share
in a plan funding amount equal to 2.5% of our operating cash
flow, subject to adjustment based on our safety performance.
During the five-year period ending in 2009, the average return
on investment was 19.0%. For 2009, the level of operating cash
flow would have produced a maximum plan funding amount of
$109.9 million based on the formula above, with no
adjustment for safety performance. However, the committee
elected to exercise its discretion under the plan to lower the
plan funding amount to the level that would be achieved under
our new AIP, as described above. As such the aggregate plan
funding amount was $32.3 million, or 0.625% of operating
cash flow as adjusted for working capital changes as reflected
in our consolidated statements of cash flows for 2009. The
committee reduced the cash awards to the
30
four-times base salary limit established under the new AIP, and
elected to grant each executive officer performance-based
restricted stock units equivalent in value to the balance of the
award. These performance-based RSUs ratably convert to shares of
our common stock over a three-year period, provided the company
continues to meet the 6% return on investment threshold
discussed above on each lapse date. The table below reflects the
value of the 2009 AIP awards, which were paid in February 2010,
as well as the aggregate value of the AIP awards received by our
executive officers for 2008 for comparison:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 AIP
|
|
|
2008 AIP
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aggregate Value
|
|
|
Aggregate Value of
|
|
|
|
Dollar Value
|
|
|
Dollar Value
|
|
|
Awarded Based on
|
|
|
2008 AIP Cash
|
|
|
|
Paid in Cash
|
|
|
Paid in RSUs
|
|
|
Adjusted Award Pool
|
|
|
Payments
|
|
Name
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
|
Mr. Moffett*
|
|
$
|
10.0
|
|
|
$
|
2.9
|
|
|
$
|
12.9
|
|
|
$
|
0.0
|
|
Mr. Adkerson*
|
|
|
10.0
|
|
|
|
2.9
|
|
|
|
12.9
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
Ms. Quirk
|
|
|
2.6
|
|
|
|
1.0
|
|
|
|
3.6
|
|
|
|
1.0
|
|
Mr. Arnold
|
|
|
2.2
|
|
|
|
0.7
|
|
|
|
2.9
|
|
|
|
1.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Totals
|
|
$
|
24.8
|
|
|
$
|
7.5
|
|
|
$
|
32.3
|
|
|
$
|
2.0
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Messrs. Moffett and Adkerson declined to receive any
payments under our AIP for 2008. |
Long-Term
Incentive Awards
Following the redesign of our executive compensation program as
discussed above, long-term incentives granted by the company may
consist of stock options, restricted stock units, or a
combination of the two.
Stock Options. Stock options are intended to
reinforce the importance of creating stockholder value.
Beginning in 1996 for Messrs. Moffett and Adkerson, and in
2005 for our other executive officers, the committees
practice was to grant larger, multi-year stock option awards
rather than smaller, annual awards. As part of the redesign of
the companys executive compensation program, the committee
re-evaluated this practice during 2009. The committee continues
to believe that stock options are an effective and appropriate
long-term incentive for our executives in that their value is
dependent on an increase in our stock price and aligns the
executives interests with those of our stockholders. In an
effort to lessen the impact of significant price variations from
year to year, the committee determined that going forward it
would grant annual, smaller equity-based awards to the
executives in the form of stock options, and may also grant RSUs
in addition to any RSUs awarded pursuant to the AIP.
Historically, the committee has used a fixed share approach for
all employees, pursuant to which it would generally grant
options for the same number of shares each year. The committee,
however, recognized that the value of the options on the grant
date should also be considered. Last year, the committee
targeted option awards with grant date Black-Scholes values
between one and three times the executives base salary.
The number of options awarded to each of our executive officers
in 2009 was determined based on grant date Black-Scholes values
of approximately three times each executives base salary.
In February 2010, the committee reconsidered the approach to
stock option grants in 2009, recognizing the difficulty in
valuing stock options as evidenced by the dramatic shift in
value of the same number of options over the course of a year.
Accordingly, for the 2010 grants, the committee considered both
the number of options granted in 2009 and the grant date values
of different award levels, and decided to grant the same number
of options as granted in 2009, with grant date values
approximating six to seven times the executives base
salaries.
31
The stock options granted in 2009 have an exercise price of
$24.59, and the stock options granted in 2010 have an exercise
price of $72.51. The grant date values of these awards are
reflected in the table below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Black-Scholes Value
|
|
|
|
Black-Scholes Value
|
|
|
|
|
of Options
|
|
|
|
of Options
|
|
|
Number of Options
|
|
Granted in
|
|
Number of Options
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
Granted in
|
|
February 2009
|
|
Granted in
|
|
in February 2010
|
Executive
|
|
February 2009
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
February 2010
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
James R. Moffett
|
|
|
500,000
|
|
|
$
|
6.78
|
|
|
|
500,000
|
|
|
$
|
15.42
|
|
Richard C. Adkerson
|
|
|
500,000
|
|
|
|
6.78
|
|
|
|
500,000
|
|
|
|
15.42
|
|
Kathleen L. Quirk
|
|
|
150,000
|
|
|
|
2.03
|
|
|
|
150,000
|
|
|
|
4.63
|
|
Michael J. Arnold
|
|
|
120,000
|
|
|
|
1.63
|
|
|
|
120,000
|
|
|
|
3.70
|
|
Restricted Stock Units. In addition to the
performance-based restricted stock units granted to our named
executive officers in February 2010 in connection with the AIP,
as discussed above, and in recognition of the companys
accomplishments during 2009, the committee made an additional
grant of performance-based restricted stock units in February
2010 to each of our executive officers. These performance-based
restricted stock units have the same terms as the
performance-based restricted stock units related to the AIP. As
discussed below, these awards are viewed by the committee as
part of 2009 total direct compensation, although they will not
be reflected in the Summary Compensation Table until 2010.
Summary
of 2009 Total Direct Compensation
As noted above, the committee views each executives
total direct compensation for a given year as the
sum of the executives base salary, payments under the AIP
for that year, and the value of long-term incentives granted in
recognition of our performance for that year. In making its
decisions regarding the appropriate levels of annual incentive
and long-term incentive awards, the committee evaluates the
impact of its decisions on the amount of total direct
compensation and the percentage of each component to total
direct compensation of the executive team as a group. Following
discussions with its consultant, the committee concluded that
the award levels described herein and the resulting total direct
compensation set forth below for the executive team were
appropriate considering the companys performance during
2009.
2009
Component Mix of
Total Direct Compensation for Executive Team
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
Base Salary
|
|
|
7%
|
|
|
Stock Options
|
|
|
46%
|
|
AIP (Cash)
|
|
|
29%
|
|
|
RSUs
|
|
|
18%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36%
|
|
|
|
|
|
64%
|
|
2009
Total Direct Compensation(1)
(in millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Black-Scholes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aggregate Value
|
|
|
Value of
|
|
|
Value of Restricted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
of AIP
|
|
|
Stock Options
|
|
|
Stock Units
|
|
|
|
|
Executive
|
|
Base Salary
|
|
|
Award(2)
|
|
|
Granted(3)
|
|
|
Granted(3)
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
James R. Moffett
|
|
$
|
2.50
|
|
|
$
|
12.90
|
|
|
$
|
15.42
|
|
|
$
|
2.90
|
|
|
$
|
33.72
|
|
Richard C. Adkerson
|
|
|
2.50
|
|
|
|
12.90
|
|
|
|
15.42
|
|
|
|
2.90
|
|
|
|
33.72
|
|
Kathleen L. Quirk
|
|
|
0.65
|
|
|
|
3.60
|
|
|
|
4.63
|
|
|
|
1.02
|
|
|
|
9.90
|
|
Michael J. Arnold
|
|
|
0.55
|
|
|
|
2.90
|
|
|
|
3.70
|
|
|
|
1.02
|
|
|
|
8.17
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Does not include the value of perquisites and personal benefits,
as well as commitments for post-employment compensation, which
amounts are included in the Summary Compensation Table and
supplementary tables below. |
32
|
|
|
(2) |
|
As discussed in more detail above, the committee exercised its
discretion under our annual incentive plan to reduce the 2009
awards to the award limits under our new annual incentive plan,
which will be effective for fiscal year 2010. As a result, each
executives cash award was limited to four times his or her
base salary, and amounts above that were awarded in an
equivalent number of restricted stock units. See Executive
Compensation Program Annual Incentive Awards
for more information. |
|
(3) |
|
In addition to the value of RSUs granted in connection with our
annual incentive plan for 2009, the committee also made
long-term equity awards to each executive officer in the form of
stock options and performance-based restricted stock units.
Although awarded in February 2010, the committee views these
grants as part of the executives 2009 total direct
compensation. See the description of these awards under
Executive Compensation Program Long-Term
Incentive Awards. |
The values of base salary and the non-equity incentive plan
compensation reflected in the Summary Compensation Table for
2009 are equivalent to the base salary and the cash portion of
the annual incentive award reflected above. However, SEC
regulations require that the Summary Compensation Table include
the value of equity awards granted in a given year,
and do not allow companies to treat equity awards granted
subsequent to the applicable fiscal year as part of the total
compensation for that fiscal year. As such, the equity awards
included in the Summary Compensation Table for 2009 reflect the
value of stock options granted in February 2009, and not the
stock options and performance-based restricted stock units
granted in 2010, which are reflected above.
Personal
Benefits and Perquisites
In addition to the primary elements of our compensation program
discussed above, we also provide certain personal benefits and
perquisites to our executive officers. In early 2009, in
connection with restructuring our executive compensation
program, the committee evaluated the personal benefits and
perquisites that we provide to our executives, and revised this
program to provide the following benefits for the reasons noted
below:
|
|
|
|
|
Personal use of company aircraft this benefit
is only provided to our chairman of the board and our chief
executive officer and is designed to provide an added level of
security to these executives and increase travel efficiencies,
thus ensuring the executives ready availability on short
notice and enabling the executives to focus more time and energy
on company matters. Our provision of this benefit also
recognizes the high degree of integration between the personal
and professional lives of these executive officers, and ensures
the security of the companys proprietary information by
enabling our officers to conduct business while traveling
without concern that company information will be compromised.
|
|
|
|
Personal use of company vehicles, and the provision of
security services and personnel these benefits
are also designed to provide added levels of security to our
executives and increase travel efficiencies, thus ensuring the
executives ready availability on short notice and enabling
the executives to focus more time and energy on company matters.
|
|
|
|
Financial and tax advice and personal use of company
facilities and personnel these benefits are in
place to provide executives with increased efficiencies in
handling personal matters, which we believe also promotes the
executives focus on company business. These benefits also
recognize the high degree of integration between the personal
and professional lives of our executive officers.
|
|
|
|
Charitable matching contributions this
program is part of our overall contribution program, and is
designed to encourage all employees, including our executives,
to contribute to hospitals, community, educational and cultural
institutions, and social service and environmental
organizations, by providing that we will match such
contributions up to certain limits.
|
The amounts reflected in the Summary Compensation
Table represent our incremental cost of providing the
benefit, and not the value of the benefit to the recipient. With
respect to personal use of
33
fractionally owned company aircraft, the aggregate incremental
cost includes the hourly operating rate, fuel costs, and excise
taxes. With respect to personal use of vehicles and the
provision of security services, the aggregate cost of providing
a car and driver is determined on an annual basis and includes
annual driver compensation and annual car lease and insurance
costs. Although the cars and drivers are available for both
business and personal use, the amounts reflected in the
Summary Compensation Table reflect the aggregate
cost to us without deducting costs attributable to business use.
Post-Termination
Compensation
In addition to the compensation received by the executive
officers during 2009 and benefits under the companys
401(k) plan, which we provide to all qualified employees, we
also provide certain post-employment benefits to our executive
officers, including a nonqualified defined contribution plan and
a supplemental executive retirement plan, as well as certain
change of control and severance benefits.
Nonqualified Defined Contribution Plan
Our nonqualified defined contribution plan
has been in place since 1996, providing those employees
considered highly compensated under applicable IRS
rules, including our executive officers, the ability to elect to
defer up to 20% of their basic compensation in excess of the
qualified plan limits. Under the plan, the company makes a
matching contribution equal to the participants deferrals
limited to 5% of the participants base salary in excess of
the qualified plan limits, and an additional contribution as
described below. We do not take into account income associated
with option exercises or the vesting of restricted stock units
when determining the companys contributions. The 5%
company contribution to the nonqualified plan noted above is
based on the companys contributions to its 401(k) plan
(the qualified plan), which provides that participants will
receive a company contribution equal to 100% of the
participants contributions to the plan not to exceed 5% of
the participants basic compensation. The purpose of the 5%
company contribution in our nonqualified plan is to continue the
5% contribution found in the 401(k) plan on a participants
basic compensation in excess of the qualified plan limits. The
nonqualified defined contribution plan is unfunded.
We had a defined benefit program in place until June 30,
2000. To compensate for the discontinuance of benefit accruals
under the defined benefit plan, we decided that we prospectively
would make an additional company contribution to our 401(k) plan
participants equal to 4% of each participants pensionable
compensation up to the applicable IRS limits, and also an
additional company contribution of 4% of compensation in excess
of such limits to participants in our nonqualified plan.
Further, because participants in a pension plan accrue most of
their benefits in the last 10 years of service, we decided
that employees who met certain age and service requirements as
of June 30, 2000, would receive an additional 6% company
contribution, for a total of 10%, to both the qualified and
nonqualified plans. As of June 30, 2000, the only two named
executive officers who met the applicable age and service
requirements were Messrs. Moffett and Adkerson, thus
resulting in the 10% contribution for each. The purpose of the
nonqualified plan is to make total retirement benefits for our
employees who earn over the qualified plan limits commensurate
with those available to other employees as a percentage of pay.
Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan
We established an unfunded supplemental
executive retirement plan (SERP) for Messrs. Moffett and
Adkerson in February 2004. The committee, advised by Mercer, its
independent compensation consultant at the time, approved the
SERP, which was then recommended to and approved by our board.
The SERP provides for benefits payable in the form of a 100%
joint and survivor annuity or an equivalent lump sum. The
annuity will equal a percentage of the executives highest
base pay for any three of the five years immediately preceding
the executives retirement, plus his average bonus for
those years, provided that the average bonus cannot exceed 200%
of average base pay. The percentage used in this calculation is
equal to 2% for each year of credited service up to
25 years, or a maximum of 50%. Income associated with
option exercises or the vesting of restricted stock units is not
a factor in determining the benefits payable under the SERP.
The SERP benefit will be reduced by the value of all benefits
received under the cash-balance program and all other retirement
plans (qualified and nonqualified), sponsored by the company, by
FM Services Company, one of our wholly owned subsidiaries, or by
any predecessor employer (including our former parent
34
company, Freeport-McMoRan Inc.), except for benefits produced by
accounts funded exclusively by deductions from the
participants pay. In addition, the SERP benefit will be
reduced by 3% per year if retirement precedes age 65.
Messrs. Moffett and Adkerson are both 100% vested under the
SERP.
Change of Control and Severance Benefits
We provide all of our named executive
officers with contractual protections in the event of a change
of control, and have also entered into employment agreements
with each of Messrs. Moffett and Adkerson and
Ms. Quirk that provide additional severance benefits. We
believe that severance protections, particularly in the context
of a change of control transaction, can play a valuable role in
attracting and retaining key executive officers by providing
protections commonly provided in the market. In addition, we
believe these benefits also serve the companys interest by
promoting a continuity of management in the context of an actual
or threatened change of control transaction. The existence of
these arrangements does not impact our decisions regarding other
components of our executive compensation program, although we
consider these severance protections an important part of our
executives compensation packages.
We also believe that the occurrence, or potential occurrence, of
a change of control transaction will create uncertainty
regarding the continued employment of our executive officers.
This uncertainty results from the fact that many change of
control transactions result in significant organizational
changes, particularly at the senior executive level. In order to
encourage certain of our executive officers to remain employed
with the company during an important time when their prospects
for continued employment following the transaction are often
uncertain, we provide our executive officers with enhanced
severance benefits if their employment is terminated by the
company without cause or, in certain cases, by the executive in
connection with a change of control. Because we believe that a
termination by the executive for good reason may be conceptually
the same as a termination by the company without cause, and
because we believe that in the context of a change of control,
potential acquirors would otherwise have an incentive to
constructively terminate the executives employment to
avoid paying severance, we believe it is appropriate to provide
severance benefits in these circumstances. In December 2008, the
committee adopted a policy whereby the company will no longer
provide excise tax
gross-up
protections in change of control arrangements adopted, renewed
or extended after December 2, 2008. This policy does not
affect the excise tax
gross-up
protections currently included in the employment agreements with
Mr. Adkerson and Ms. Quirk; however, in accordance
with this policy, the agreements with Mr. Adkerson and
Ms. Quirk will not be extended, renewed or continued beyond
January 1, 2012, with these
gross-up
protections in place.
We do not believe that our executive officers should be entitled
to receive cash severance benefits merely because a change of
control transaction occurs. The payment of cash severance
benefits is only triggered by an actual or constructive
termination of employment following a change of control
(i.e. a double trigger). Under their
respective incentive agreements, however, our executive officers
would be entitled to accelerated vesting of their outstanding
equity awards automatically upon a change of control of the
company, whether or not the officers employment is
terminated. This treatment of the equity awards in connection
with a change of control applies to all award recipients.
As described in more detail below under Potential Payments
Upon Termination or Change in Control,
Messrs. Moffett and Adkerson and Ms. Quirk would also
be entitled under their employment agreements to severance
benefits in the event of a termination of employment by the
company without cause or by the executive for good reason. The
committee has determined that it is appropriate to provide these
executives with severance benefits under these circumstances in
light of their positions with the company and as part of their
overall compensation package.
Tax
Considerations
Section 162(m). Section 162(m)
of the Internal Revenue Code (the Code) limits to
$1 million a public companys annual tax deduction for
compensation paid to each of its most highly compensated
executive officers. Qualified performance-based compensation is
excluded from this deduction limitation if certain requirements
are met. The committees policy is to structure
compensation awards that will be deductible where doing so will
further the purposes of our executive compensation programs. The
committee
35
also considers it important to retain flexibility to design
compensation programs that recognize a full range of criteria
important to our success, even where compensation payable under
the programs may not be fully deductible. As such, the committee
may implement revised or additional compensation programs in the
future as it deems appropriate or necessary to adequately
compensate our executive team.
With respect to the compensation received by our named executive
officers for 2009, the committee believes that the stock options
and the awards under our AIP qualify for the exclusion from the
deduction limitation under Section 162(m). With the
exception of a portion of the salary paid to our executive
chairman and our chief executive officer, the committee
anticipates that the remaining components of individual
executive compensation that do not qualify for an exclusion from
Section 162(m) should not exceed $1 million in any
given year and therefore will qualify for deductibility.
Sections 280G and 4999. Code
Section 4999 imposes a 20% excise tax on the recipient of
an excess parachute payment and Code
Section 280G disallows the tax deduction to the payor of
any amount of an excess parachute payment that is contingent on
a change of control. In order to be subject to the excise tax,
payments as a result of a change of control must exceed three
times the executives base amount as determined under
Section 280G, but once this threshold is achieved the
excise tax is imposed on the payments that exceed one time the
executives base amount. Pursuant to the employment
agreements with Mr. Adkerson and Ms. Quirk, we have
agreed to provide each of them with a
gross-up
payment to reimburse the executive for the excise tax under Code
Section 4999 as well as any additional income and excise
taxes resulting from such reimbursement, but such payment will
only be triggered if their change of control benefits exceed
110% of the Section 280G limit. The intent of the tax
gross-up is
to provide a benefit without a tax penalty to those executives
who are displaced in the event of a change of control, and to
avoid disparate treatment of individuals as a result of
imposition of the tax, which can have arbitrary results in
application. As noted above, in December 2008, the committee
adopted a policy whereby the company will no longer provide
excise tax
gross-up
protections in change of control arrangements adopted, renewed
or extended after December 2, 2008. This policy does not
affect the excise tax
gross-up
protections currently included in the employment agreements with
Mr. Adkerson and Ms. Quirk; however, in accordance
with this policy, the agreements with Mr. Adkerson and
Ms. Quirk will not be extended, renewed or continued beyond
January 1, 2012, with these
gross-up
protections in place.
Corporate
Personnel Committee Report
The corporate personnel committee of our board of directors has
reviewed and discussed with management the Compensation
Discussion and Analysis required by Item 402(b) of
Regulation S-K,
and based on such review and discussion, the corporate personnel
committee recommended to the board that the Compensation
Discussion and Analysis be included in this proxy statement.
Submitted by the Corporate Personnel Committee as of
April 14, 2010:
H. Devon Graham, Jr., Chairman
Robert J. Allison, Jr.
Charles C. Krulak
Bobby Lee Lackey
36
Executive
Compensation Tables
The table below summarizes the total compensation paid to or
earned by our chief executive officer, our chief financial
officer, and our executive officers other than the chief
executive officer and chief financial officer (collectively, the
named executive officers). See Compensation Discussion and
Analysis for a more detailed discussion of our executive
compensation program.
2009
Summary Compensation Table
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Value and
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonqualified
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-Equity
|
|
Deferred
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
Option
|
|
Incentive Plan
|
|
Compensation
|
|
All Other
|
|
|
Name and
|
|
|
|
Salary
|
|
Awards
|
|
Awards
|
|
Compensation
|
|
Earnings
|
|
Compensation
|
|
|
Principal Position
|
|
Year
|
|
(1)
|
|
(2)
|
|
(3)
|
|
(4)
|
|
(5)
|
|
(6)
|
|
Total
|
|
James R. Moffett
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
$
|
2,500,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
6,775,000
|
|
|
$
|
10,000,000
|
|
|
$
|
1,139,171
|
|
|
$
|
1,062,912
|
|
|
$
|
21,477,083
|
|
Chairman of the Board
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
2,500,000
|
|
|
$
|
14,799,977
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,489,324
|
|
|
|
3,633,719
|
|
|
|
22,423,020
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
2,500,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33,300,000
|
|
|
|
29,790,000
|
|
|
|
1,266,517
|
|
|
|
2,734,907
|
|
|
|
69,591,424
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Richard C. Adkerson
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
2,500,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,775,000
|
|
|
|
10,000,000
|
|
|
|
7,534,110
|
|
|
|
813,223
|
|
|
|
27,622,333
|
|
President & Chief
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
2,500,000
|
|
|
|
66,549,903
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,011,710
|
|
|
|
3,203,774
|
|
|
|
77,265,387
|
|
Executive Officer
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
2,083,333
|
|
|
|
21,689,955
|
|
|
|
33,300,000
|
|
|
|
5,432,000
|
|
|
|
2,623,389
|
|
|
|
2,688,390
|
|
|
|
67,817,067
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kathleen L. Quirk
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
650,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,032,500
|
|
|
|
2,600,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
106,629
|
|
|
|
5,389,129
|
|
Executive Vice
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
650,000
|
|
|
|
10,043,673
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,000,000
|
|
|
|
9,936
|
|
|
|
205,541
|
|
|
|
11,909,150
|
|
President, Chief
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
566,667
|
|
|
|
1,574,994
|
|
|
|
11,100,000
|
|
|
|
2,879,600
|
|
|
|
8,057
|
|
|
|
197,807
|
|
|
|
16,327,125
|
|
Financial Officer & Treasurer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Michael J. Arnold
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
550,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,626,000
|
|
|
|
2,200,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
109,354
|
|
|
|
4,485,354
|
|
Executive Vice
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
550,000
|
|
|
|
2,637,391
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,000,000
|
|
|
|
28,622
|
|
|
|
281,051
|
|
|
|
4,497,064
|
|
President & Chief
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
500,000
|
|
|
|
787,497
|
|
|
|
7,770,000
|
|
|
|
3,504,600
|
|
|
|
27,381
|
|
|
|
418,188
|
|
|
|
13,007,666
|
|
Administrative Officer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Messrs. Moffett and Adkerson and Ms. Quirk also
provide services to and receive compensation from McMoRan. Until
February 1, 2007, Ms. Quirks compensation was
paid through an allocation arrangement under a services
agreement with the Services Company, under which 75% of
Ms. Quirks salary was allocated to us and 25% of
Ms. Quirks salary was allocated to McMoRan.
Accordingly, the amounts reflected in the Summary
Compensation Table in 2007 represent only the portion
allocated to us. Effective February 1, 2007, 100% of
Ms. Quirks salary was allocated to us. |
|
(2) |
|
Restricted stock unit awards are valued on the date of grant at
the closing sale price per share of our common stock. |
|
(3) |
|
These amounts reflect the grant date fair value of the options
granted to the named executive officers, determined using the
Black-Scholes option model. For information relating to the
assumptions made by us in valuing the option awards made to our
named executive officers in fiscal years 2007 through 2009,
refer to Notes 1 and 12 of our financial statements in our
annual report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2009. |
|
(4) |
|
The amounts reported in the Non-Equity Incentive Plan
Compensation column reflect, for each named executive
officer, the annual cash incentive payments received under our
annual incentive plan for fiscal |
37
|
|
|
|
|
years 2009, 2008 and 2007, and the cash payout of units granted
under our discontinued long-term performance incentive plan that
vested on December 31, 2007, as follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-Term
|
|
|
|
|
Annual
|
|
Performance
|
|
|
|
|
Incentive Plan
|
|
Incentive Plan
|
Name
|
|
Year
|
|
Cash Payment
|
|
Payout
|
|
Mr. Moffett
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
$
|
10,000,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
23,000,000
|
|
|
$
|
6,790,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mr. Adkerson
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
10,000,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,432,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ms. Quirk
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
2,600,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
1,000,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
1,250,000
|
|
|
|
1,629,600
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mr. Arnold
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
2,200,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
1,000,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
1,875,000
|
|
|
|
1,629,600
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For 2007, the amounts reported under Annual Incentive Plan Cash
Payment do not include the performance-based RSUs that certain
executive officers elected to receive in lieu of cash payments.
The grant date fair value of these awards is reflected in the
Stock Awards column. |
|
(5) |
|
The amounts reported in the Change in Pension Value and
Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Earnings column include
(a) the change in actuarial value of our defined benefit
program, (b) the change in actuarial value of our
supplemental executive retirement plan for Messrs. Moffett
and Adkerson, and (c) above-market or preferential
nonqualified deferred compensation earnings, as set forth in the
table below. See the Retirement Benefit Programs
section for more information. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental
|
|
|
Above-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Defined
|
|
|
Retirement
|
|
|
Market
|
|
Name
|
|
Year
|
|
|
Benefit Plan
|
|
|
Plan
|
|
|
Earnings
|
|
|
Mr. Moffett
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,139,171
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
$
|
53,941
|
|
|
|
1,049,284
|
|
|
$
|
386,099
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
968,722
|
|
|
|
297,795
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mr. Adkerson
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,534,110
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
6,856
|
|
|
|
4,813,353
|
|
|
|
191,501
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,498,160
|
|
|
|
125,229
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ms. Quirk
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
1,841
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,095
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
3,514
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,543
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mr. Arnold
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
4,044
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24,578
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
7,719
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,662
|
|
|
|
|
(6) |
|
The amounts reported in the All Other Compensation
column for 2009 reflect, for each named executive officer as
applicable, the sum of the incremental cost to the company of
all perquisites and other personal benefits and additional all
other compensation required by the SEC rules to be separately
quantified, including (A) amounts contributed by the
company to defined contribution plans, (B) the dollar value
of life insurance premiums paid by the company, (C) the
dollar value of interest credited on dividend equivalents on
unvested RSUs during 2009 and (D) director fees, which were
discontinued in May 2009. The amounts reported include
(a) matching gifts under the matching gifts program,
(b) personal financial and tax advice under the
companys program, (c) the aggregate incremental cost
to the company of the executives personal use of
fractionally owned company aircraft, which includes the hourly
operating rate, fuel costs and excise taxes, (d) personal
use of company facilities and personnel, and (e) personal
use of company cars and security services, as reflected in the
table below. The aggregate incremental cost to the |
38
|
|
|
|
|
company of Messrs. Moffett and Adkersons personal use
of fractionally owned company aircraft does not include the lost
tax deduction for expenses that exceeded the amounts reported as
income for each executive, which for fiscal year 2009 was
approximately $111,000 for Mr. Moffett and $64,000 for
Mr. Adkerson. For Mr. Arnold, the amounts reported
also include a tax adjustment for the prior year. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Perquisites and Other Personal Benefits
|
|
|
|
Additional All Other Compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credited on
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Matching
|
|
|
and Tax
|
|
|
Aircraft
|
|
|
Facilities and
|
|
|
Security and
|
|
|
Tax
|
|
|
|
Plan
|
|
|
Insurance
|
|
|
Dividend
|
|
|
Director
|
|
Name
|
|
Gifts
|
|
|
Advice
|
|
|
Usage
|
|
|
Personnel
|
|
|
Cars
|
|
|
Adjustment
|
|
|
|
Contributions
|
|
|
Premiums
|
|
|
Equivalents
|
|
|
Fees
|
|
Mr. Moffett
|
|
$
|
40,000
|
|
|
$
|
20,000
|
|
|
$
|
211,327
|
|
|
$
|
108,311
|
|
|
$
|
183,020
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
354,950
|
|
|
$
|
136,753
|
|
|
$
|
5,551
|
|
|
$
|
3,000
|
|
Mr. Adkerson
|
|
|
40,000
|
|
|
|
20,000
|
|
|
|
168,098
|
|
|
|
43,767
|
|
|
|
150,158
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
327,200
|
|
|
|
21,668
|
|
|
|
39,332
|
|
|
|
3,000
|
|
Ms. Quirk
|
|
|
20,000
|
|
|
|
2,300
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
77,340
|
|
|
|
2,543
|
|
|
|
4,446
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mr. Arnold
|
|
|
12,000
|
|
|
|
16,425
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
850
|
|
|
$
|
6,079
|
|
|
|
|
68,400
|
|
|
|
4,055
|
|
|
|
1,545
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grants of
Plan-Based Awards
in Fiscal Year 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated Future
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payouts Under
|
|
|
All Other Option
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-Equity
|
|
|
Awards:Number of
|
|
|
Exercise or Base
|
|
|
Grant Date Fair
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Incentive Plan
|
|
|
Securities
|
|
|
Price of Option
|
|
|
Value of Stock and
|
|
Name
|
|
Grant Date
|
|
|
Awards Target
|
|
|
Underlying Options
|
|
|
Awards(2)
|
|
|
Option Awards
|
|
|
James R. Moffett
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AIP- Cash Award
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
33,720,000
|
(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options
|
|
|
02/02/09
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
500,000
|
|
|
$
|
24.59
|
|
|
$
|
6,775,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Richard C. Adkerson
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AIP- Cash Award
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33,720,000
|
(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options
|
|
|
02/02/09
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
500,000
|
|
|
|
24.59
|
|
|
|
6,775,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kathleen L. Quirk
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AIP- Cash Award
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,273,000
|
(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options
|
|
|
02/02/09
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
150,000
|
|
|
|
24.59
|
|
|
|
2,032,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Michael J. Arnold
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AIP- Cash Award
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,587,000
|
(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options
|
|
|
02/02/09
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
120,000
|
|
|
|
24.59
|
|
|
|
1,626,000
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Represents the estimated maximum possible annual cash incentive
payment that could have been received by each named executive
officer pursuant to the annual incentive plan for fiscal year
2009. These estimated amounts were calculated by multiplying the
percentage of the award pool under the plan allocated to each
officer for 2009 by the maximum plan funding amount produced for
the 2008 plan year (including adjustments made to the 2008 pool
by the committee). The actual amounts paid in early 2010 to each
of the named executive officers pursuant to the annual incentive
plan for 2009 were significantly less than the estimated
payments included in this table and are reflected in the
Summary Compensation Table. See the discussion
regarding our annual incentive plan in Compensation
Discussion and Analysis for more information. |
|
(2) |
|
The exercise price of each stock option reflected in this table
was determined by reference to the closing quoted per share sale
price of our common stock on the Composite Tape for New York
Stock Exchange-Listed Stocks on the grant date. |
39
Outstanding
Equity Awards at December 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Option Awards(1)
|
|
|
Stock Awards(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
Equity Incentive
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Incentive Plan
|
|
|
Plan Awards:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Awards:
|
|
|
Market or
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Payout
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unearned
|
|
|
Value of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares,
|
|
|
Unearned
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Units or
|
|
|
Shares,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities
|
|
|
Securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
Units or
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Underlying
|
|
|
Underlying
|
|
|
Option
|
|
|
Option
|
|
|
Rights That
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
Grant
|
|
|
Unexercised Options
|
|
|
Unexercised Options
|
|
|
Exercise
|
|
|
Expiration
|
|
|
Have Not
|
|
|
Rights That Have
|
|
Name
|
|
Date
|
|
|
Exercisable
|
|
|
Unexercisable
|
|
|
Price(3)
|
|
|
Date
|
|
|
Vested
|
|
|
Not Vested(4)
|
|
|
James R. Moffett
|
|
|
05/11/07
|
|
|
|
375,000
|
|
|
|
750,000
|
|
|
$
|
72.92
|
|
|
|
05/11/17
|
|
|
|
115,670
|
|
|
$
|
9,287,144
|
|
|
|
|
02/02/09
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
500,000
|
|
|
|
24.59
|
|
|
|
02/02/19
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Richard C. Adkerson
|
|
|
02/01/05
|
|
|
|
250,000
|
(5)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37.04
|
|
|
|
02/01/15
|
|
|
|
633,270
|
|
|
|
50,845,248
|
|
|
|
|
05/11/07
|
|
|
|
750,000
|
|
|
|
750,000
|
|
|
|
72.92
|
|
|
|
05/11/17
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
02/02/09
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
500,000
|
|
|
|
24.59
|
|
|
|
02/02/19
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kathleen L. Quirk
|
|
|
02/04/03
|
|
|
|
7,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18.89
|
|
|
|
02/04/13
|
|
|
|
82,232
|
|
|
|
6,602,407
|
|
|
|
|
02/03/04
|
|
|
|
37,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36.77
|
|
|
|
02/03/14
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
02/01/05
|
|
|
|
185,750
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37.04
|
|
|
|
02/01/15
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
05/11/07
|
|
|
|
250,000
|
|
|
|
250,000
|
|
|
|
72.92
|
|
|
|
05/11/17
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
02/02/09
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
150,000
|
|
|
|
24.59
|
|
|
|
02/02/19
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Michael J. Arnold
|
|
|
02/01/05
|
|
|
|
56,250
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37.04
|
|
|
|
02/01/15
|
|
|
|
25,258
|
|
|
|
2,027,965
|
|
|
|
|
05/11/07
|
|
|
|
175,000
|
|
|
|
175,000
|
|
|
|
72.92
|
|
|
|
05/11/17
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
02/02/09
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
120,000
|
|
|
|
24.59
|
|
|
|
02/02/19
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The stock options become exercisable in 25% annual increments on
each of the first four anniversaries of the date of grant and
have a term of 10 years. The stock options will become
immediately exercisable in their entirety if, under certain
circumstances (a) any person or group of persons acquires
beneficial ownership of shares in excess of certain thresholds,
or (b) the composition of the board of directors is changed
after a tender offer, exchange offer, merger, consolidation,
sale of assets or contested election or any combination of these
transactions. |
|
(2) |
|
The restricted stock units held by the named executive officers
will vest and be paid out in shares of our common stock as
follows, provided the average return on investment for the five
calendar years preceding the year of vesting is at least 6%: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name
|
|
RSUs
|
|
|
Vesting Date
|
|
|
Mr. Moffett
|
|
|
57,835
|
|
|
|
01/28/10
|
|
|
|
|
57,835
|
|
|
|
01/28/11
|
|
Mr. Adkerson
|
|
|
40,000
|
|
|
|
01/01/10
|
|
|
|
|
192,653
|
|
|
|
01/28/10
|
|
|
|
|
127,964
|
|
|
|
01/30/10
|
|
|
|
|
40,000
|
|
|
|
01/01/11
|
|
|
|
|
192,653
|
|
|
|
01/28/11
|
|
|
|
|
40,000
|
|
|
|
01/01/12
|
|
Ms. Quirk
|
|
|
15,000
|
|
|
|
01/01/10
|
|
|
|
|
13,970
|
|
|
|
01/28/10
|
|
|
|
|
9,292
|
|
|
|
01/30/10
|
|
|
|
|
15,000
|
|
|
|
01/01/11
|
|
|
|
|
13,970
|
|
|
|
01/28/11
|
|
|
|
|
15,000
|
|
|
|
01/01/12
|
|
Mr. Arnold
|
|
|
10,306
|
|
|
|
01/28/10
|
|
|
|
|
4,646
|
|
|
|
01/30/10
|
|
|
|
|
10,306
|
|
|
|
01/28/11
|
|
|
|
|
(3) |
|
Effective January 30, 2007, the corporate personnel
committee of our board of directors amended its policies to
provide that the exercise price of an option shall not be less
than the closing quoted per share |
40
|
|
|
|
|
sale price of our common stock on the Composite Tape for New
York Stock Exchange-Listed Stocks on the grant date or, if there
are no reported sales on such date, on the last preceding date
on which any reported sale occurred. Thus, the exercise price of
the stock options expiring in 2017 and thereafter was determined
by reference to the closing price of our common stock. Prior to
that time, the exercise price of each outstanding stock option
reflected in this table was determined by reference to the
average of the high and low quoted per share sale price of our
common stock on the Composite Tape for New York Stock
Exchange-Listed Stocks on the grant date or, if there are no
reported sales on such date, on the last preceding date on which
any reported sale occurred. |
|
(4) |
|
The market value of the unvested restricted stock units
reflected in this table was based on the $80.29 closing market
price per share of our common stock on December 31, 2009. |
|
(5) |
|
Mr. Adkerson previously transferred to his former spouse
the right to receive the underlying shares due upon exercise of
125,000 of these outstanding options, net of shares used to pay
the exercise price and taxes. |
Option
Exercises and Stock Vested During 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Option Awards
|
|
Stock Awards
|
|
|
Number of Shares
|
|
Value Realized
|
|
Number of Shares
|
|
Value Realized on
|
Name
|
|
Acquired on Exercise
|
|
on Exercise(1)
|
|
Acquired on Vesting
|
|
Vesting(2)
|
|
James R. Moffett
|
|
|
375,000
|
|
|
$
|
10,507,500
|
|
|
|
57,835
|
|
|
$
|
1,623,428
|
|
Richard C. Adkerson
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
454,963
|
|
|
|
11,974,243
|
|
Kathleen L. Quirk
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41,687
|
|
|
|
1,078,443
|
|
Michael J. Arnold
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,378
|
|
|
|
492,222
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The value realized on exercise is based on the difference
between the closing sale price on the date of exercise and the
exercise price of each option. |
|
(2) |
|
The value realized on vesting is based on the closing sale price
on the date of vesting of the restricted stock units or, if
there were no reported sales on such date, on the last preceding
date on which any reported sale occurred. |
Retirement
Benefit Programs
Nonqualified Defined Contribution
Plan. We maintain an unfunded nonqualified
defined contribution plan for the benefit of our executive
officers, as well as others. Under the plan, certain highly
compensated employees may elect to make contributions of up to
20% of their base salary. A participant may defer under this
plan when his or her ECAP (the companys 401(k) plan)
contributions have ceased due to application of the Internal
Revenue Code compensation or contribution limits. The company
makes a matching contribution equal to the participants
deferrals limited to 5% of the participants base salary
above the qualified plan limit. In addition, the company also
makes enhanced contributions equal to 4% of eligible
compensation (base salary plus 50% of bonus) in excess of
qualified plan limits for each eligible employee, with employees
who met certain age and service requirements in 2000 (only
Messrs. Moffett and Adkerson) receiving an additional 6%
contribution. Distribution is made in a lump sum as soon as
practicable and allowable under law following separation from
service. The table below sets forth the balances under our
nonqualified defined contribution plan as of December 31,
2009 for each named executive officer listed below.
41
2009
Nonqualified Deferred Compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aggregate
|
|
|
Executive
|
|
Registrant
|
|
Aggregate
|
|
Aggregate
|
|
Balance at
|
|
|
Contributions in
|
|
Contributions in
|
|
Earnings in Last
|
|
Withdrawals/
|
|
Last Fiscal Year
|
Name
|
|
Last Fiscal Year(1)
|
|
Last Fiscal Year(2)
|
|
Fiscal Year(3)
|
|
Distributions
|
|
End(4)
|
|
James R. Moffett
|
|
$
|
203,000
|
|
|
$
|
322,200
|
|
|
$
|
749,137
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
23,787,859
|
|
Richard C. Adkerson
|
|
|
478,000
|
|
|
|
294,700
|
|
|
|
498,075
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,018,079
|
|
Kathleen L. Quirk
|
|
|
29,000
|
|
|
|
55,290
|
|
|
|
16,449
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
560,405
|
|
Michael J. Arnold
|
|
|
27,500
|
|
|
|
46,350
|
|
|
|
83,017
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,646,249
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The amounts reflected in this column are included in the
Salary column for each named executive officer for
2009 reported in the Summary Compensation Table. |
|
(2) |
|
The amounts reflected in this column are included in the
All Other Compensation column for each named
executive officer for 2009 in the Summary Compensation
Table, although the Plan Contributions
reflected in footnote 6 to that table also include contributions
to the companys 401(k) plan. |
|
(3) |
|
The assets in the plan are treated as if invested to produce a
rate of interest equal to the prime rate, as published in the
Federal Reserve Statistical Report at the beginning of each
month. For 2009, that rate of interest was equal to 3.25% for
the entire year and none of the earnings were considered
preferential. |
|
(4) |
|
The following amounts reflected in this column for each named
executive officer were included in the 2008 total
compensation for each named executive officer in the
Summary Compensation Table:
Mr. Moffett $3,144,148,
Mr. Adkerson $3,129,250,
Ms. Quirk $162,486 and
Mr. Arnold $255,889. The following amounts
reflected in this column for each named executive officer were
included in the 2007 total compensation for each
named executive officer in the Summary Compensation
Table: Mr. Moffett $2,204,762,
Mr. Adkerson $1,664,379,
Ms. Quirk $89,655 and
Mr. Arnold $182,158. |
Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan
Messrs. Moffett and Adkerson. In
February 2004, we established an unfunded Supplemental Executive
Retirement Plan (SERP) for Messrs. Moffett and Adkerson.
The corporate personnel committee, advised by its independent
compensation consultant at that time, approved the SERP, which
was then recommended to and approved by our board. The SERP
provides for benefits payable in the form of a 100% joint and
survivor annuity, life annuity or an equivalent lump sum. If a
participant retires prior to attaining 25 years of credited
service, the annuity will equal a percentage of the
executives highest average base pay for any three of the
five calendar years immediately preceding the executives
retirement, plus his average bonus for the same three years;
provided that the average bonus can not exceed 200% of the
average base pay. The percentage used in this calculation is 2%
for each year of credited service for the company and its
predecessor beginning in 1981, but capped at 25 years. For
Mr. Moffett, who has attained 25 years of credited
service, the annuity was fixed as of January 1 following his
completion of 25 years of credited service, and will only
increase at retirement as a result of mortality and interest
adjustments.
The SERP benefit is reduced by the value of all benefits from
current and former retirement plans (qualified and
nonqualified), sponsored by the company, by the Services Company
or by any predecessor employer (including our former parent
company, Freeport-McMoRan Inc.), except for benefits produced by
accounts funded exclusively by deductions from the
participants pay. The amounts provided in the table below
reflect these reductions. In addition, the SERP benefit will be
reduced by 3% per year if retirement precedes age 65.
Messrs. Moffett and Adkerson are both 100% vested under the
SERP, and each has elected to receive his SERP benefit in a lump
sum.
42
2009
Pension Benefits
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of Years
|
|
Present Value of
|
Name
|
|
Plan Name
|
|
Credited Service(1)
|
|
Accumulated Benefit(2)
|
|
James R. Moffett
|
|
Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
$
|
17,952,515
|
|
Richard C. Adkerson
|
|
Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
21,557,809
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The years of credited service under the SERP is the
participants years of service with the company and its
predecessor beginning in 1981, but capped at 25 years. |
|
(2) |
|
The present value of the accumulated benefit at the normal
retirement date is calculated using the following assumptions:
the mortality table described in Revenue Ruling
2001-62 of
the IRS, and a 6% interest rate. For Mr. Adkerson, who had
not reached his normal retirement date as of the end of the
year, the present value at normal retirement date is then
discounted to December 31, 2009 using a 4% interest rate
with no mortality. |
Potential
Payments upon Termination or Change of Control
Employment Agreements Messrs. Moffett and
Adkerson and Ms. Quirk. We have entered
into employment agreements with each of Messrs. Moffett and
Adkerson and Ms. Quirk, which were approved by our
corporate personnel committee, and our board.
Mr. Moffett. The employment agreement
with Mr. Moffett provides for a base salary of $2,500,000
per year and eligibility to participate in our annual incentive
plan. Mr. Moffett continues to be eligible for all other
benefits and compensation, including stock options, generally
provided to our most senior executives. The amended term of the
agreement continued through December 31, 2009, with
automatic one-year extensions unless a change of control occurs
or prior written notice is given by the committee that it does
not wish to extend the agreement. In the event of a change of
control during the employment term, Mr. Moffetts
employment will continue for an additional three years following
the change of control pursuant to his change of control
agreement. Mr. Moffetts agreement also contains
non-competition, nondisclosure and other provisions intended to
protect our interests in the event that he ceases to be employed.
Mr. Adkerson and Ms. Quirk. The
employment agreements with Mr. Adkerson and Ms. Quirk
reflect the current base salary for each executive officer,
$2,500,000 for Mr. Adkerson and $650,000 for
Ms. Quirk, and provide that each executive officer is
eligible to participate in our annual incentive plan.
Mr. Adkerson and Ms. Quirk continue to be eligible for
all other benefits and compensation, including stock options,
generally provided to our most senior executives. The original
term of each agreement expires January 1, 2012, but will
automatically extend for additional one-year terms unless prior
written notice is given by the committee that it does not wish
to extend the agreement. In the event of a change of control,
the agreements will expire three years following the change of
control. These agreements also contain non-competition,
nondisclosure and other provisions intended to protect our
interests in the event that the executive officer ceases to be
employed.
In addition to the post-employment benefits provided under the
companys retirement benefit programs described above, as
of December 31, 2009, we provided the following additional
benefits to our named executive officers.
Severance Benefits Messrs. Moffett and
Adkerson and Ms. Quirk. As of
December 31, 2009, the employment agreements for
Messrs. Moffett and Adkerson and Ms. Quirk provide
that if we terminate the executives employment without
cause or the executive terminates employment for good reason, we
will make certain payments and provide certain benefits to the
executive, including:
|
|
|
|
|
payment of a pro rata bonus for the year in which the
termination of employment occurs,
|
|
|
|
a cash payment equal to three times the sum of (a) the
executives base salary plus (b) the average of the
bonuses paid to the executive for the immediately preceding
three years,
|
43
|
|
|
|
|
continuation of insurance and welfare benefits for three years
or until the executive accepts new employment, if
earlier, and
|
|
|
|
acceleration of the vesting and payout of all outstanding stock
options and restricted stock units.
|
Under the employment agreements, cause is generally
defined as the executives (a) failure to perform
substantially the executives duties with the company,
(b) breach of the agreement, (c) felony conviction,
(d) unauthorized acts resulting in harm to the company or
(e) falsification of financial records. Good
reason is generally defined as (a) any failure by the
company to materially comply with any of the provisions of the
agreement or (b) the assignment to the executive of any
duties inconsistent in any material respect with the
executives position, authority, duties or responsibilities
under the agreement.
If the executives employment terminates as a result of
death, disability or retirement, benefits to the executive or
the executives estate include the payment of a pro rata
bonus for the year of termination and, in the case of
retirement, the continuation of insurance and welfare benefits
for three years or until the executive accepts new employment,
if earlier. The executive will also receive an additional
years vesting on unvested stock options, vesting of
certain outstanding restricted stock units, all as described in
footnotes (1) (2) to the table below.
As a condition to receipt of these severance benefits, the
executive must retain in confidence all confidential information
known to him or her concerning our business. Further,
Messrs. Moffett and Adkerson have each agreed not to
compete with us for a period of two years after termination of
employment. Ms. Quirk has agreed not to compete with us for
a period of six months after termination of employment.
Change of Control Benefits
Messrs. Moffett and Adkerson and
Ms. Quirk. As of December 31, 2009,
the change of control agreement for Mr. Moffett provides
generally that the executives terms and conditions of
employment (including position, compensation and benefits) will
not be adversely changed until the third anniversary of the
change of control. The employment agreements for
Mr. Adkerson and Ms. Quirk provide generally that the
executives terms and conditions of employment (including
position, compensation and benefits) will not be adversely
changed until the third anniversary of the change of control.
If any of Messrs. Moffett or Adkerson or Ms. Quirk is
terminated without cause, as generally defined
above, or if the executive terminates for good
reason during the covered period after a change of
control, the executive is generally entitled to receive the same
payments and benefits that he or she would receive in the event
of a similar termination under the employment agreements,
described above, except the executive will receive a cash
payment equal to three times the sum of the executives
base salary plus the highest bonus paid to the executive (rather
than the average bonus paid to the executive) for the
immediately preceding three fiscal years. This is a double
trigger agreement meaning that they do not receive
benefits unless (1) a change of control occurs and
(2) employment is terminated. The term good
reason includes the failure of the acquiror to provide the
executive with substantially the same position, authority,
duties and responsibilities in the ultimate parent company of
the entity resulting from the transaction, in addition to the
reasons generally provided above.
If employment terminates as a result of death, disability or
retirement following a change of control, the executive will
receive the same benefits described above under Severance
Benefits - Messrs. Moffett and Adkerson and
Ms. Quirk in the event of death, disability or
retirement. In addition, Mr. Adkerson and
Ms. Quirks employment agreements provide that if the
executive is subject to excise tax on amounts payable under the
agreements that are considered to be excess parachute payments
under Section 4999 of the Internal Revenue Code, the
executive is entitled to receive a
gross-up
payment in an amount sufficient to cover any excise taxes due if
the payments related to the change of control exceed 110% of the
Internal Revenue Code Section 280G limit. If the benefits
received are equal to or less than 110% of the 280G limit, such
benefit will be reduced to avoid imposition of the excise tax.
In December 2008, the corporate personnel committee adopted a
policy pursuant to which the company will no longer provide
excise tax
gross-up
protections in change of control arrangements adopted, revised
or extended after December 2, 2008, although such
protections in place on such date will continue through the term
of the relevant agreement. As a result, Mr. Moffetts
change of control agreement does not provide an
44
excise tax
gross-up. If
any part of the payments or benefits received by
Mr. Moffett in connection with a termination following a
change of control constitutes an excess parachute payment under
Section 4999 of the Internal Revenue Code, he will receive
the greater of (a) the amount of such payments and benefits
reduced so that none of the amount constitutes an excess
parachute payment, net of income taxes, or (b) the amount
of such payments and benefits, net of income taxes and net of
excise taxes under Section 4999 of the Internal Revenue
Code. This policy does not affect the excise tax
gross-up
protections currently included in the employment agreements with
Mr. Adkerson and Ms. Quirk; however, in accordance
with this policy, the agreements with Mr. Adkerson and
Ms. Quirk will not be extended, renewed or continued beyond
January 1, 2012, with these
gross-up
protections in place.
The confidentiality and non-competition provisions of the
executives employment agreements continue to apply after a
change of control.
Change of Control Benefits
Mr. Arnold. We have entered into an
amended and restated change of control agreement with
Mr. Arnold, which was approved by our corporate personnel
committee, and our board. If a change of control (as defined in
the change of control agreement) occurs prior to
December 31, 2011, the agreement provides generally that
the executives terms and conditions of employment
(including position, location, compensation and benefits) will
not be adversely changed until the later of the third
anniversary of the change of control or December 31, 2011.
If the executive is terminated without cause or if the executive
terminates for good reason during the covered period
after a change of control (a double trigger), the
executive is generally entitled to receive the following:
|
|
|
|
|
payment of a pro rata bonus for the year in which the
termination of employment occurs,
|
|
|
|
a cash payment equal to three times the sum of (a) the
executives base salary plus (b) the highest bonus
paid to the executive for any of the preceding three years,
|
|
|
|
continuation of insurance and welfare benefits for three years
or until the executive accepts new employment, if
earlier, and
|
|
|
|
acceleration of the vesting and payout of all outstanding stock
options and restricted stock units.
|
The term good reason includes the failure of the
acquiror to provide the executive with substantially the same
position, authority, duties and responsibilities in the ultimate
parent company of the entity resulting from the transaction. If
any part of the payments or benefits received by Mr. Arnold
in connection with a termination following a change of control
constitutes an excess parachute payment under Section 4999
of the Internal Revenue Code, he will receive the greater of
(a) the amount of such payments and benefits reduced so
that none of the amount constitutes an excess parachute payment,
net of income taxes, or (b) the amount of such payments and
benefits, net of income taxes and net of excise taxes under
Section 4999 of the Internal Revenue Code.
45
The following table quantifies the potential payments to our
named executive officers under the contracts, arrangements or
plans discussed above, for various scenarios involving a change
of control or termination of employment of each of our named
executive officers, assuming a December 31, 2009
termination date, and where applicable, using the closing price
of our common stock of $80.29 on December 31, 2009, as
reported on the NYSE. In addition to these benefits, our named
executive officers would be entitled to receive the retirement
and pension benefits described above under Retirement
Benefit Programs, and outstanding vested stock options
which amounts are reflected in the Walk-Away Value
column.
Potential
Payments upon Termination or Change in Control
(in millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Walk-Away
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
|
|
Options
|
|
Stock Units
|
|
Dividends &
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(including
|
|
|
|
|
(Unvested
|
|
(Unvested
|
|
Interest
|
|
Health
|
|
|
|
|
|
Value of
|
|
|
|
|
and
|
|
and
|
|
Payable on
|
|
and
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vested
|
|
|
Lump Sum
|
|
Accelerated)
|
|
Accelerated)
|
|
Accelerated
|
|
Welfare
|
|
Tax
|
|
|
|
Benefits)
|
Name
|
|
Payment
|
|
(1)
|
|
(2)
|
|
RSUs
|
|
Benefits
|
|
Gross-Up
|
|
Total
|
|
(6)
|
|
James R. Moffett
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retirement
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
$
|
9.73
|
|
|
$
|
4.64
|
|
|
$
|
0.09
|
|
|
$
|
0.42
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
$
|
14.88
|
|
|
$
|
59.38
|
|
Death/Disability
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
9.73
|
|
|
|
4.64
|
|
|
|
0.09
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
14.46
|
|
|
|
58.97
|
|
Termination-Good Reason/No Cause
|
|
$
|
68.63
|
|
|
|
33.38
|
|
|
|
9.29
|
|
|
|
0.18
|
|
|
|
0.42
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
111.89
|
|
|
|
156.40
|
|
Termination
after Change of Control(3)(4)
|
|
|
120.90
|
|
|
|
33.38
|
|
|
|
9.29
|
|
|
|
0.18
|
|
|
|
0.42
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
164.17
|
|
|
|
208.67
|
|
Richard C. Adkerson
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retirement
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
9.73
|
|
|
|
36.57
|
|
|
|
0.92
|
|
|
|
0.07
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
47.28
|
|
|
|
101.20
|
|
Death/Disability
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
9.73
|
|
|
|
46.20
|
|
|
|
1.11
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
57.04
|
|
|
|
110.95
|
|
Termination-Good Reason/No Cause
|
|
|
59.76
|
|
|
|
33.38
|
|
|
|
41.21
|
|
|
|
1.01
|
|
|
|
0.07
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
135.43
|
|
|
|
189.35
|
|
Termination after Change of Control(3)
|
|
|
120.90
|
|
|
|
33.38
|
|
|
|
50.85
|
|
|
|
1.20
|
|
|
|
0.07
|
|
|
$
|
54.71
|
|
|
|
261.10
|
|
|
|
315.02
|
|
Kathleen L. Quirk
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retirement
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
3.01
|
|
|
|
2.46
|
|
|
|
0.06
|
|
|
|
0.02
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
5.55
|
|
|
|
18.08
|
|
Death/Disability
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
3.01
|
|
|
|
6.07
|
|
|
|
0.13
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
9.21
|
|
|
|
21.74
|
|
Termination-Good Reason/ No Cause
|
|
|
9.25
|
|
|
|
10.20
|
|
|
|
2.99
|
|
|
|
0.07
|
|
|
|
0.02
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
22.53
|
|
|
|
35.06
|
|
Termination after Change of Control(3)
|
|
|
14.55
|
|
|
|
10.20
|
|
|
|
6.60
|
|
|
|
0.14
|
|
|
|
0.02
|
|
|
|
8.84
|
|
|
|
40.36
|
|
|
|
52.89
|
|
Michael J. Arnold
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retirement
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
2.32
|
|
|
|
1.49
|
|
|
|
0.04
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
3.85
|
|
|
|
10.22
|
|
Death/Disability
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
2.32
|
|
|
|
1.49
|
|
|
|
0.04
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
3.85
|
|
|
|
10.22
|
|
Termination-No Cause(5)
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
6.37
|
|
Termination after Change of Control(3)(4)
|
|
|
14.25
|
|
|
|
7.97
|
|
|
|
2.03
|
|
|
|
0.05
|
|
|
|
0.02
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
24.32
|
|
|
|
30.69
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Generally, pursuant to the terms of the stock option agreements,
upon termination of the executives employment as a result
of death, disability or retirement, the unvested portion of any
outstanding stock option that would have vested within one year
of the date of termination will vest. The value of the
accelerated options is determined by multiplying (a) the
difference between the December 31, 2009 closing price of
our common stock and the applicable exercise price of each
option, by (b) the number of unvested and accelerated
options. |
|
(2) |
|
Pursuant to the terms of the restricted stock unit agreements
outstanding as of December 31, 2009, termination of the
executives employment as a result of death, disability or
retirement will result in acceleration of vesting of certain
outstanding restricted stock units and the related amounts
credited to the participants dividend equivalent account
and all property distributions deposited in such account. In
particular, (a) the restricted stock units granted to the
executives in connection with the elective restrictive stock
unit program will fully vest upon the executives
termination of employment as a result of death, disability or
retirement, (b) the restricted stock units granted to the
executives in January 2008 in connection with the 2007 annual
incentive awards will partially vest upon the executives
termination of employment as a result of death, disability or
retirement, and (c) the restricted stock units granted to
Mr. Adkerson and Ms. Quirk in connection with their
employment agreements in January 2008 will fully vest upon the
executives termination of employment as a result of death
or disability, but not retirement. In addition, upon a
termination by the company without cause, the corporate
personnel committee, in its discretion, may elect to accelerate
the vesting of the outstanding restricted stock units. The
values of the accelerated restricted stock units were determined
by multiplying the year-end closing price of our common stock by
the number of unvested and accelerated restricted stock units
under each scenario. |
46
|
|
|
(3) |
|
Certain of the benefits described in the table would be achieved
in the event of a change of control alone, and would not require
a termination of the executives employment. In particular,
pursuant to the terms of our stock incentive plans and the
individual award agreements, upon a change of control as defined
in the plans, (a) all outstanding stock options would
immediately vest and (b) all restrictions on outstanding
restricted stock units would lapse. |
|
(4) |
|
Pursuant to the terms of the executives change of control
agreement, the total payments may be subject to reduction if
such payments result in the imposition of an excise tax under
Section 280G of the Internal Revenue Code. |
|
(5) |
|
Mr. Arnold is entitled to certain severance benefits in the
event of his termination without cause under the companys
Severance Plan, which is generally available to all eligible
employees. |
|
(6) |
|
Includes the value of the following benefits as of
December 31, 2009 for each named executive officer, as
applicable: outstanding,
in-the-money
vested stock options, the aggregate balance of the Nonqualified
Defined Contribution Plan (as reflected on page 42), and
the present value of the Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan
(as reflected on page 43). These amounts do not include
benefits under our 401(k) plan or life insurance policies. In
addition to the standard life insurance policy generally
available to employees, Mr. Moffett and Mr. Adkerson
each have an executive life insurance policy providing for a
death benefit of $3.75 million and $1.5 million,
respectively. |
Audit
Committee Report
The audit committee is currently comprised of five directors,
all of whom are independent, as defined by SEC rules and in the
NYSEs listing standards. We operate under a written
charter approved by our committee and adopted by the board of
directors. Our primary function is to assist the board of
directors in fulfilling the boards oversight
responsibilities by monitoring (1) the companys
continuing development and performance of its system of
financial reporting, auditing, internal controls and legal and
regulatory compliance, (2) the operation and integrity of
the system, (3) performance and qualifications of the
companys internal auditor and independent registered
public accounting firm and (4) the independence of the
companys independent registered public accounting firm.
We review the companys financial reporting process on
behalf of our board. The audit committees responsibility
is to monitor this process, but the audit committee is not
responsible for preparing the companys financial
statements or auditing those financial statements. Those are the
responsibilities of management and the companys
independent registered public accounting firm, respectively.
During 2009, management assessed the effectiveness of the
companys system of internal control over financial
reporting in connection with the companys compliance with
Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. The audit
committee reviewed and discussed with management, the internal
auditor and Ernst & Young managements report on
internal control over financial reporting and Ernst &
Youngs report on their audit of the companys
internal control over financial reporting, both of which are
included in the companys annual report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2009.
Appointment
of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm; Financial
Statement Review
In February 2009, in accordance with our charter, our committee
appointed Ernst & Young LLP (Ernst & Young)
as the companys independent registered public accounting
firm for 2009. We have reviewed and discussed the companys
audited financial statements for the year 2009 with management
and Ernst & Young. Management represented to us that
the audited financial statements fairly present, in all material
respects, the financial condition, results of operations and
cash flows of the company as of and for the periods presented in
the financial statements in accordance with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States, and
Ernst & Young provided an audit opinion to the same
effect.
We have received from Ernst & Young the written
disclosures and the letter required by applicable requirements
of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board regarding the
independent registered public accounting firm communications
with the audit committee concerning independence, and we have
discussed with them their independence from the company and
management. We have also discussed with Ernst &
47
Young the matters required to be discussed by Statement on
Auditing Standards No. 61, Communication with Audit
Committees, as amended and as adopted by the Public Company
Accounting Oversight Board in Rule 3200T, and Public
Company Accounting Oversight Board Auditing Standard No. 5,
An Audit of Internal Control Over Financial Reporting that is
Integrated with an Audit of Financial Statements.
In addition, we have discussed with Ernst & Young the
overall scope and plans for their audit, and have met with them
and management to discuss the results of their examination,
their understanding and evaluation of the companys
internal controls as they considered necessary to support their
opinion on the financial statements for the year 2009, and
various factors affecting the overall quality of accounting
principles applied in the companys financial reporting.
Ernst & Young also met with us without management
being present to discuss these matters.
In reliance on these reviews and discussions, we recommended to
the board of directors, and the board of directors approved, the
inclusion of the audited financial statements referred to above
in the companys annual report on
Form 10-K
for the year 2009.
Internal
Audit
We also review the companys internal audit function,
including the selection and compensation of the companys
internal auditor. In February 2009, in accordance with our
charter, our committee appointed Deloitte & Touche LLP
(Deloitte & Touche) as the companys internal
auditor for 2009. We have discussed with Deloitte &
Touche the scope of their audit plan, and have met with them to
discuss the results of their reviews, their review of
managements documentation, testing and evaluation of the
companys system of internal control over financial
reporting, any difficulties or disputes with management
encountered during the course of their reviews and other matters
relating to the internal audit process. The internal auditor
also met with us without management being present to discuss
these matters.
Dated: April 16, 2010
Robert A. Day, Chairman
Gerald J. Ford
H. Devon Graham, Jr.
Jon C. Madonna
Stephen H. Siegele
Independent
Registered Public Accounting Firm
Fees and
Related Disclosures for Accounting Services
The following table discloses the fees for professional services
provided by Ernst & Young LLP in each of the last two
fiscal years:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Audit Fees
|
|
$
|
8,253,000
|
|
|
$
|
8,427,000
|
|
Audit-Related Fees(1)
|
|
|
12,000
|
|
|
|
227,000
|
|
Tax Fees(2)
|
|
|
138,000
|
|
|
|
136,000
|
|
All Other Fees
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Relates to services rendered in connection with (a) audits
of stand-alone statutory and benefit plan financial statements
and (b) compliance with financial, accounting and
regulatory reporting matters. |
|
(2) |
|
Relates to services rendered in connection with advice on
transfer pricing and international tax matters. |
The audit committee has determined that the provision of the
services described above is compatible with maintaining the
independence of the independent registered public accounting
firm.
48
Pre-Approval
Policies and Procedures
The audit committees policy is to pre-approve all audit
services, audit-related services and other services permitted by
law provided by the independent registered public accounting
firm. In accordance with that policy, the committee annually
pre-approves a list of specific services and categories of
services, including audit, audit-related and other services, for
the upcoming or current fiscal year, subject to specified cost
levels. Any service that is not included in the approved list of
services must be separately pre-approved by the audit committee.
In addition, if fees for any service exceed the amount that has
been pre-approved, then payment of additional fees for such
service must be specifically pre-approved by the audit
committee; however, any proposed service that has an anticipated
or additional cost of no more than $30,000 may be pre-approved
by the chairman of the audit committee, provided that the total
anticipated costs of all such projects pre-approved by the
chairman during any fiscal quarter does not exceed $60,000.
At each regularly-scheduled audit committee meeting, management
updates the committee on the scope and anticipated cost of
(a) any service pre-approved by the chairman since the last
meeting of the committee and (b) the projected fees for
each service or group of services being provided by the
independent registered public accounting firm. Since the 2003
effective date of the SEC rules stating that an auditor is not
independent of an audit client if the services it provides to
the client are not appropriately approved, each service provided
by our independent registered public accounting firm has been
approved in advance by the audit committee, and none of those
services required use of the de minimus exception to
pre-approval contained in the SECs rules.
Selection
and Ratification of the Independent Registered Public Accounting
Firm
In February 2010, our audit committee appointed
Ernst & Young LLP as our independent registered public
accounting firm for 2010. Our audit committee and board of
directors seek stockholder ratification of the audit
committees appointment of Ernst & Young as the
independent registered public accounting firm to audit our and
our subsidiaries financial statements for the year 2010.
If the stockholders do not ratify the appointment of
Ernst & Young, our audit committee will reconsider
this appointment. Representatives of Ernst & Young are
expected to be present at the meeting to respond to appropriate
questions, and those representatives will also have an
opportunity to make a statement if they desire to do so.
Certain
Transactions
Our Corporate Governance Guidelines provide that any transaction
that would require disclosure under Item 404(a) of
Regulation S-K
of the rules and regulations of the SEC, with respect to a
director or executive officer, must be reviewed and approved, or
ratified, annually by the board of directors. Any such related
party transactions will only be approved or ratified if the
board determines that such transaction will not impair the
involved persons service to, and exercise of judgment on
behalf of, the company, or otherwise create a conflict of
interest that would be detrimental to the company. All of the
transactions relating to our directors described below have been
reviewed and approved or ratified by our board.
We are parties to a services agreement with our wholly owned
subsidiary, FM Services Company (the Services Company), under
which the Services Company provides us with executive,
technical, administrative, accounting, financial, tax and other
services on a cost-reimbursement basis. The Services Company
also provides these services to McMoRan Exploration Co.
(McMoRan). Several of our directors and executive officers also
serve as directors or executive officers of McMoRan.
Messrs. Moffett, Adkerson, Rankin, Day, Ford and Graham,
each of whom is a director of our company, also serve as
directors of McMoRan. Messrs. Moffett and Adkerson and Ms.
Quirk, each of whom is an executive officer of our company, also
serve as executive officers of McMoRan. For services rendered to
McMoRan, in February 2009, Mr. Moffett received options to
purchase 450,000 shares of McMoRans common stock,
Mr. Adkerson received options to purchase
300,000 shares of McMoRans common stock, and
Ms. Quirk received options to purchase 75,000 shares
of McMoRans common stock, all at a grant price of $6.44,
which was determined by reference to the closing quoted per
share sale price on the composite tape for NYSE-listed stocks on
the grant date. Messrs. Moffett and Adkerson and
Ms. Quirk received option grants to purchase the same
number of shares in
49
February 2010 at the then-current market price. In addition, our
directors and executive officers own more than 10% of
McMoRans common stock. In 2009, McMoRan incurred
approximately $8.4 million of costs under its services
agreement, and we expect McMoRans costs under its services
agreement to approximate $7.0 million in 2010.
B. M. Rankin, Jr. and the Services Company are parties
to an agreement, renewable annually, under which Mr. Rankin
renders business consulting services to us and McMoRan relating
to finance, accounting, guidance and advice on public policy
matters and business development. The Services Company provides
Mr. Rankin compensation, medical coverage and reimbursement
for taxes in connection with those medical benefits. In 2009,
the Services Company paid Mr. Rankin $490,000 ($389,991 of
which was allocated to us) pursuant to this agreement. During
2009, the cost to the Services Company (all of which was
allocated to us) for Mr. Rankins personal use of
company facilities was $39,600, medical expenses was $9,347, and
reimbursement for a portion of his office rent and utilities and
for executive administrative and support services was $21,914 .
In addition, during 2009 the aggregate incremental cost to the
Services Company (all of which was allocated to us) for
Mr. Rankins personal use of fractionally owned
company aircraft, which includes the hourly operating rate, fuel
costs and excise taxes, was $351,856. The aggregate incremental
cost does not include the lost tax deduction for expenses that
exceeded the amounts reported as income for Mr. Rankin,
which for fiscal year 2009 was approximately $117,000.
Accordingly, the total received by Mr. Rankin during 2009
pursuant to this agreement was $912,717, of which $812,708 was
allocated to us.
J. Bennett Johnston and the Services Company are parties to
an agreement, renewable annually, under which Mr. Johnston
provides consulting services to us relating to international
relations and commercial matters. Under this agreement,
Mr. Johnston receives an annual consulting fee of $300,000
and reimbursement of reasonable
out-of-pocket
expenses incurred in connection with providing services. The
annual consulting fee includes Mr. Johnstons $75,000
annual fee for serving on our board and as a member of our
public policy committee. In addition, David Norriss, an employee
of the company, is married to Mr. Johnstons daughter.
As the
son-in-law
of a director of the company, Mr. Norriss is deemed to be a
related person under Item 404(a) of
Regulation S-K.
The aggregate value of salary, bonus, and other benefits paid by
us to Mr. Norriss for the year ended December 31,
2009, was less than $350,000.
Gabrielle K. McDonald and the Services Company are parties to an
agreement, renewable annually, under which Ms. McDonald
renders consulting services to us in connection with her role as
Special Counsel on Human Rights to our company. Under this
agreement, Ms. McDonald receives an annual fee of $300,000,
plus reimbursement of reasonable
out-of-pocket
expenses incurred in connection with rendering consulting
services. The annual consulting fee includes
Ms. McDonalds $75,000 annual fee for serving on our
board and for serving as a member of our public policy committee.
J. Stapleton Roy is Senior Advisor of Kissinger Associates,
Inc. Kissinger Associates and the Services Company are parties
to agreements, renewable annually, under which Kissinger
Associates provides to us advice and consultation on specified
world political, economic, strategic and social developments
affecting our affairs. Under these agreements, Kissinger
Associates receives an annual fee of $200,000, additional
consulting fees based on the services rendered, and
reimbursement of reasonable
out-of-pocket
expenses incurred in connection with providing such services. In
addition, Mr. Roy is Director of the Kissinger Institute on
China and the United States at the Woodrow Wilson International
Center for Scholars. In 2008, our company agreed to contribute
$150,000 to the Institute to be paid in three equal installments
in each of 2008, 2009 and 2010.
J. Taylor Wharton and the Services Company are parties to
an agreement, renewable annually, under which Mr. Wharton
renders consulting services in connection with all medical and
health affairs affecting our directors, officers and employees.
Under this agreement, Mr. Wharton receives an annual fee of
$400,000, plus reimbursement of reasonable
out-of-pocket
expenses incurred in connection with rendering consulting
services.
50
Proposal
to Adopt the Amended and Restated 2006 Stock Incentive
Plan
Our board of directors unanimously approved, and recommends that
our stockholders approve, the Amended and Restated 2006 Stock
Incentive Plan (the Amended and Restated Plan) to,
among other things, permit our non-management directors and
advisory directors to participate. The Amended and Restated Plan
is summarized below and attached as Annex A to this
proxy statement. Because this is a summary, it does not contain
all the information that may be important to you. You should
read Annex A carefully before you decide how to vote.
Reasons
for the Proposal and Description of Proposed
Amendments
We believe that our growth depends significantly upon the
efforts of our officers, directors, employees and other service
providers and that such individuals are best motivated to put
forth maximum effort on our behalf if they own an equity
interest in our company. As described in the section entitled
Director Compensation, our director compensation
program includes annual equity awards in the form of stock
options and restricted stock units to our non-management
directors and advisory directors. In recent years, these annual
equity awards have been made pursuant to a separate equity
compensation plan, the 2004 Director Compensation Plan. As
of the date of this proxy statement, there are approximately
2,000 shares available for grant under the
2004 Director Compensation Plan, although approximately
21 million shares of our common stock remain available for
grant under the 2006 Stock Incentive Plan. In lieu of proposing
a new separate plan for non-management directors and advisory
directors, we are proposing to expand the class of persons
eligible to participate in the 2006 Stock Incentive Plan to
include non-management and advisory directors. We are not
proposing to increase the number of shares that may be granted
under the 2006 Stock Incentive Plan. In addition, we are
proposing to (a) add a maximum dollar limit of
$5 million on Other Stock-Based Awards that are valued in
dollars and paid to a participant in a calendar year, in order
that such awards may be structured to be exempt from the
compensation limit set forth in Section 162(m) of the
Internal Revenue Code, (b) reduce the overall
sub-limit
applicable to full value shares that may be granted under the
plan from 11 million to 8.5 million shares, of which
approximately 6.6 million remain available to grant taking
into consideration the full-value awards previously granted
under the plan, and (c) extend the term of the 2006 Stock
Incentive Plan from July 10, 2017 to June 9, 2020,
which is ten years after the date of the 2010 annual meeting.
Summary
of the Amended and Restated 2006 Stock Incentive Plan
Administration. The corporate personnel
committee of our board of directors will generally administer
the Amended and Restated Plan and, except with respect to grants
to non-management directors and advisory directors, has the
authority to make awards under the Amended and Restated Plan and
to set the terms of the awards. The corporate personnel
committee will also generally have the authority to interpret
the Amended and Restated Plan, to establish any rules or
regulations relating to the Amended and Restated Plan that it
determines to be appropriate and to make any other determination
that it believes necessary or advisable for proper
administration of the Amended and Restated Plan. The nominating
and corporate governance committee of our board will have the
authority to grant awards to non-management and advisory
directors, to set the terms of those awards, and to interpret
and establish rules regarding non-management director and
advisory director awards. The term committee is used
in this section of the proxy statement to refer to both the
corporate personnel committee and the nominating and corporate
governance committee in their administrative roles.
Eligible Participants. The following
persons are eligible to participate in the Amended and Restated
Plan:
|
|
|
|
|
our officers (including non-employee officers and officers who
are also directors) and employees;
|
|
|
|
our non-management directors and advisory directors;
|
|
|
|
officers and employees of existing or future subsidiaries;
|
|
|
|
officers and employees of any entity with which we have
contracted to receive executive, management, or legal services
and who provide services to us or a subsidiary under such
arrangement;
|
|
|
|
consultants and advisers who provide services to us or a
subsidiary; and
|
|
|
|
any person who has agreed in writing to become an eligible
participant within 30 days.
|
51
A subsidiary is defined to include an entity in which we have a
direct or indirect economic interest that is designated as a
subsidiary by the corporate personnel committee.
The corporate personnel committee may delegate to one or more of
our officers the power to grant awards and to modify or
terminate awards granted to eligible persons who are not our
executive officers or directors, subject to certain limitations.
The committees determinations as to which eligible
individuals will be granted awards and the terms of the awards
will be based on each individuals present and potential
contributions to our success. The number of persons currently
eligible to receive awards under this Amended and Restated Plan
is approximately 256, consisting of 24 officers, 14
non-management directors, and 230 employees of our company
and the Services Company and 2 consultants.
Awards to Non-Management Directors and Advisory
Directors. As noted above, we previously
maintained the 2004 Director Compensation Plan pursuant to
which our non-management directors and advisory directors were
automatically granted stock options relating to
10,000 shares of our common stock and 2,000 restricted
stock units on June 1 of each year as long as shares remained
available for grant under the plan. That plan is almost depleted
and is no longer available for annual equity grants to our
non-management directors and advisory directors. Under the
Amended and Restated Plan, the nominating and corporate
governance committee has discretion to make equity-based grants
to our non-management directors and advisory directors as it
deems appropriate.
Number of Shares; Plan Limits. The
maximum number of shares of our common stock with respect to
which awards may be granted under the Amended and Restated Plan
is 37 million. As stated above, there are currently
approximately 21 million shares of common stock remaining
available for grant under the Amended and Restated Plan, which
represents approximately 4.9% of our outstanding common stock
and approximately 4.1% of our fully-diluted outstanding common
stock (assuming conversion of all outstanding convertible
securities, exercise of all outstanding options, vesting of all
outstanding restricted stock units and issuance of all shares
available for grant under stock plans) as of March 31,
2010. As of March 31, 2010, our fully-diluted outstanding
common stock includes approximately 38.8 million shares
issuable upon conversion of our
63/4%
Mandatory Convertible Preferred Stock (assuming the current
conversion rate of 1.3716) and approximately 36,000 shares
issuable upon conversion of our 7% Convertible Senior Notes
due 2011 (at a conversion price of $30.16 per share).
Awards that may be paid only in cash will not be counted against
this share limit. No individual may receive in any year awards
under this Amended and Restated Plan that relate to more than
3,750,000 shares of our common stock. The maximum value of
an Other Stock-Based Award that is valued in dollars and
scheduled to be paid out to a participant in any calendar year
is $5 million.
Shares subject to awards that are forfeited or canceled will
again be available for awards, as will shares issued as
restricted stock or Other Stock-Based Awards that are forfeited
or reacquired by us by their terms. Under no circumstances may
the number of shares issued pursuant to incentive stock options
exceed 37,000,000 shares. The number of shares with respect
to which awards of restricted stock, restricted stock units and
Other Stock-Based Awards for which a per share purchase price of
less than 100% of fair market value is paid may not exceed
8,500,000 shares, and based on the number of restricted
stock units granted under the plan since its initial approval by
stockholders, this limit is currently 6,554,718 shares. Of
this amount, only 1,500,000 may be issued without compliance
with certain minimum vesting requirements. The shares to be
delivered under this Amended and Restated Plan will be made
available from our authorized but unissued shares of common
stock, from treasury shares or from shares acquired by us on the
open market or otherwise. Subject to the terms of this Amended
and Restated Plan, shares of our common stock issuable under
this Amended and Restated Plan may also be used as the form of
payment of compensation under other plans or arrangements that
we offer or that we assume in a business combination.
On April 13, 2010, the closing price on the New York Stock
Exchange of a share of our common stock was $84.77.
Types of Awards. Stock options, stock
appreciation rights, restricted stock, restricted stock units
and Other Stock-Based Awards may be granted under the Amended
and Restated Plan in the discretion of the committee, each of
which is described below.
52
Stock Options and Stock Appreciation
Rights. Options granted under the Amended and
Restated Plan may be either nonqualified or incentive stock
options. Only our employees or employees of our subsidiaries are
eligible to receive incentive stock options. Stock appreciation
rights may be granted in conjunction with or unrelated to other
awards and, if in conjunction with an outstanding option or
other award, may be granted at the time of the award or
thereafter, at the exercise price of the other award if
permitted by Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code.
The committee has discretion to fix the exercise or grant price
of stock options and stock appreciation rights at a price not
less than 100% of the fair market value of the underlying common
stock at the time of grant (or at the time of grant of the
related award in the case of a stock appreciation right granted
in conjunction with an outstanding award if permitted by
Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code). This limitation
on the committees discretion, however, does not apply in
the case of awards granted in substitution for outstanding
awards previously granted by an acquired company or a company
with which we combine. The committee has broad discretion as to
the terms and conditions upon which options and stock
appreciation rights are exercisable, but under no circumstances
will an option or a stock appreciation right have a term
exceeding 10 years. The Amended and Restated Plan prohibits
the reduction in the exercise price of stock options without
stockholder approval except for certain adjustments described
below.
The option exercise price may be paid:
|
|
|
|
|
in cash or cash equivalent;
|
|
|
|
in shares of our common stock;
|
|
|
|
through a cashless exercise arrangement with a
broker approved in advance by the company;
|
|
|
|
if approved by the committee, through a net
exercise, whereby shares of common stock equal in value to
the aggregate exercise price or less are withheld from the
issuance, or
|
|
|
|
in any other manner authorized by the committee.
|
Upon the exercise of a stock appreciation right with respect to
our common stock, a participant will be entitled to receive, for
each share subject to the right, the excess of the fair market
value of the share on the date of exercise over the exercise
price. The committee has the authority to determine whether the
value of a stock appreciation right is paid in cash or our
common stock or a combination of the two.
Restricted Stock. The committee may grant to a
participant restricted shares of our common stock that are
subject to restrictions regarding the sale, pledge or other
transfer by the participant for a specified period. All shares
of restricted stock will be subject to the restrictions that the
committee may designate in an agreement with the participant,
including, among other things, that the shares are required to
be forfeited or resold to us in the event of termination of
employment under certain circumstances or in the event specified
performance goals or targets are not met. Except for restricted
stock grants to non-management directors and advisory directors
and certain other limited exceptions, a restricted period of at
least three years is required, with incremental vesting
permitted during the three-year period, except that if the
vesting or grant of shares of restricted stock is subject to the
attainment of performance goals, the restricted period may be
one year or more with incremental vesting permitted. Subject to
the restrictions provided in the participants agreement, a
participant receiving restricted stock will have all of the
rights of a stockholder as to the restricted stock, including
dividend and voting rights.
Restricted Stock Units and Other Stock-Based
Awards. The committee may also grant participants
awards of restricted stock units, as well as awards of our
common stock and other awards that are denominated in, payable
in, valued in whole or in part by reference to, or are otherwise
based on the value of, our common stock (Other Stock-Based
Awards). The committee has discretion to determine the
participants to whom restricted stock units or Other Stock-Based
Awards are to be made, the times at which such awards are to be
made, the size of the awards, the form of payment, and all other
conditions of the awards, including any restrictions, deferral
periods or performance requirements. Except for restricted stock
grants to non-management directors and advisory directors and
certain other limited exceptions, a vesting period of at least
three years is required, with incremental vesting permitted
during the three-year period, except that if the
53
vesting is subject to the attainment of performance goals, the
vesting period may be one year or more with incremental vesting
permitted. The terms of the restricted stock units and the Other
Stock-Based Awards will be subject to the rules and regulations
that the committee determines, and may include the right to
receive currently or on a deferred basis dividends or dividend
equivalents.
Performance-Based Compensation under
Section 162(m). Stock options and stock
appreciation rights, if granted in accordance with the terms of
the Amended and Restated Plan, are intended to qualify as
performance-based compensation under Section 162(m) of the
Internal Revenue Code. For grants of restricted stock,
restricted stock units and Other Stock-Based Awards that are
intended to qualify as performance-based compensation under
Section 162(m), the committee will establish specific
performance goals for each performance period not later than
90 days after the beginning of the performance period. The
committee will also establish a schedule, setting forth the
portion of the award that will be earned or forfeited based on
the degree of achievement of the performance goals by our
company, a division or a subsidiary at the end of the
performance period. The committee will use any or a combination
of the following performance measures: earnings per share,
return on assets, an economic value added measure, shareholder
return, earnings, return on equity, return on investment, cash
provided by operating activities, increase in cash flow, return
on cash flow, or increase in production, of the company, a
division of the company or a subsidiary. For any performance
period, the performance objectives may be measured on an
absolute basis or relative to a group of peer companies selected
by the committee, relative to internal goals, or relative to
levels attained in prior years. If an award of restricted stock,
restricted stock units or an Other Stock-Based Award is intended
to qualify as performance-based compensation under
Section 162(m), the committee must certify in writing that
the performance goals and all applicable conditions have been
met prior to payment.
If there is a change of control of our company or if a
participant retires, dies or becomes disabled during the
performance period, the committee may provide that all or a
portion of the stock options, restricted stock, restricted stock
units and Other Stock-Based Awards will automatically vest.
The committee retains authority to change the performance goal
objectives with respect to future grants to any of those
provided in the Amended and Restated Plan.
Adjustments. If the committee
determines that any stock dividend or other distribution
(whether in the form of cash, securities or other property),
recapitalization, reorganization, stock split, reverse stock
split, merger, consolidation,
split-up,
spin-off, combination, repurchase or exchange of shares,
issuance of warrants or other rights to purchase shares or other
securities of our company, or other similar corporate event
affects our common stock in such a way that an adjustment is
appropriate to prevent dilution or enlargement of the benefits
intended to be granted and available for grant under the Amended
and Restated Plan, then the committee shall:
|
|
|
|
|
make equitable adjustments in
|
|
|
|
|
o
|
the number and kind of shares (or other securities or property)
that may be the subject of future awards under this Amended and
Restated Plan, and
|
|
|
o
|
the number and kind of shares (or other securities or property)
subject to outstanding awards and the respective grant or
exercise prices; and
|
|
|
|
|
|
if appropriate, provide for the payment of cash to a participant.
|
The committee may also adjust awards to reflect unusual or
nonrecurring events that affect us or our financial statements
or to reflect changes in applicable laws or accounting
principles.
Amendment or Termination. The Amended
and Restated Plan may be amended or terminated at any time by
the board of directors, except that no amendment may materially
impair an award previously granted without the consent of the
recipient and no amendment may be made without stockholder
approval if the amendment would:
|
|
|
|
|
materially increase the benefits accruing to participants under
this plan;
|
|
|
|
increase the number of shares of our common stock that may be
issued under this plan;
|
54
|
|
|
|
|
materially expand the classes of persons eligible to participate
in this plan;
|
|
|
|
expand the types of awards available under the plan;
|
|
|
|
materially extend the term of the plan;
|
|
|
|
materially change the method of determining the exercise price
of options or the grant price of stock appreciation
rights; or
|
|
|
|
permit a reduction in the exercise price of options.
|
Unless terminated sooner, no awards will be made under the
Amended and Restated Plan after June 9, 2020.
Federal
Income Tax Consequences of Awards
The federal income tax consequences related to the issuance of
the different types of awards that may be granted under the
Amended and Restated Plan are summarized below. Participants who
are granted awards under the Amended and Restated Plan should
consult their own tax advisors to determine the tax consequences
based on their particular circumstances.
Stock Options. A participant who is
granted a stock option normally will not realize any income, nor
will our company normally receive any deduction for federal
income tax purposes, in the year the option is granted.
When a nonqualified stock option granted through the Amended and
Restated Plan is exercised, the participant will realize
ordinary income measured by the difference between the aggregate
purchase price of the shares acquired and the aggregate fair
market value of the shares acquired on the exercise date and,
subject to the limitations of Section 162(m) of the
Internal Revenue Code, we will be entitled to a deduction in the
year the option is exercised equal to the amount the participant
is required to treat as ordinary income.
An employee generally will not recognize any income upon the
exercise of any incentive stock option, but the excess of the
fair market value of the shares at the time of exercise over the
option price will be an item of tax preference, which may,
depending on particular factors relating to the employee,
subject the employee to the alternative minimum tax imposed by
Section 55 of the Internal Revenue Code. The alternative
minimum tax is imposed in addition to the federal individual
income tax, and it is intended to ensure that individual
taxpayers do not completely avoid federal income tax by using
preference items. An employee will recognize capital gain or
loss in the amount of the difference between the exercise price
and the sale price on the sale or exchange of stock acquired
pursuant to the exercise of an incentive stock option, provided
the employee does not dispose of such stock within two years
from the date of grant and one year from the date of exercise of
the incentive stock option (the holding periods). An employee
disposing of such shares before the expiration of the holding
periods will recognize ordinary income generally equal to the
difference between the option price and the fair market value of
the stock on the date of exercise. The remaining gain, if any,
will be capital gain. Our company will not be entitled to a
federal income tax deduction in connection with the exercise of
an incentive stock option, except where the employee disposes of
the shares received upon exercise before the expiration of the
holding periods.
If the exercise price of a nonqualified option is paid by the
surrender of previously owned shares, the basis and the holding
period of the previously owned shares carry over to the same
number of shares received in exchange for the previously owned
shares. The compensation income recognized on exercise of these
options is added to the basis of the shares received. If the
exercised option is an incentive stock option and the shares
surrendered were acquired through the exercise of an incentive
stock option and have not been held for the holding periods, the
optionee will recognize income on such exchange, and the basis
of the shares received will be equal to the fair market value of
the shares surrendered. If the applicable holding period has
been met on the date of exercise, there will be no income
recognition and the basis and the holding period of the
previously owned shares will carry over to the same number of
shares received in exchange, and the remaining shares will begin
a new holding period and have a zero basis.
55
Stock Appreciation Rights. Generally, a
participant who is granted a stock appreciation right under the
Amended and Restated Plan will not recognize any taxable income
at the time of the grant. The participant will recognize
ordinary income upon exercise equal to the amount of cash or the
fair market value of the stock received on the day it is
received.
In general, there are no federal income tax deductions allowed
to our company upon the grant of stock appreciation rights. Upon
the exercise of the stock appreciation right, however, we will
be entitled to a deduction equal to the amount of ordinary
income that the participant is required to recognize as a result
of the exercise, provided that the deduction is not otherwise
disallowed under Section 162(m).
Restricted Stock. Unless the
participant makes an election to accelerate recognition of the
income to the date of grant (as described below), the
participant will not recognize income, and we will not be
allowed a tax deduction, at the time the restricted stock award
is granted. When the restrictions lapse, the participant will
recognize ordinary income equal to the fair market value of the
shares as of that date, and we will be allowed a corresponding
federal income tax deduction at that time, subject to any
applicable limitations under Section 162(m) of the Internal
Revenue Code. If the participant files an election under
Section 83(b) of the Internal Revenue Code within
30 days of the date of grant of restricted stock, the
participant will recognize ordinary income as of the date of the
grant equal to the fair market value of the stock as of that
date, and our company will be allowed a corresponding federal
income tax deduction at that time, subject to any applicable
limitations under Section 162(m). Any future appreciation
in the stock will be taxable to the participant at capital gains
rates. If the stock is later forfeited, however, the participant
will not be able to recover the tax previously paid pursuant to
a Section 83(b) election.
Restricted Stock Units. A participant
will not be deemed to have received taxable income upon the
grant of restricted stock units. The participant will be deemed
to have received taxable ordinary income at such time as shares
are distributed with respect to the restricted stock units in an
amount equal to the fair market value of the shares distributed
to the participant. Upon the distribution of shares to a
participant with respect to restricted stock units, we will
ordinarily be entitled to a deduction for federal income tax
purposes in an amount equal to the taxable ordinary income of
the participant, subject to any applicable limitations under
Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code. The basis of
the shares received will equal the amount of taxable ordinary
income recognized by the participant upon receipt of such shares.
Other Stock-Based Awards. Generally, a
participant who is granted an Other Stock-Based Award under the
Amended and Restated Plan will recognize ordinary income at the
time the cash or shares of common stock associated with the
award are received. If stock is received, the ordinary income
will be equal to the excess of the fair market value of the
stock received over any amount paid by the participant in
exchange for the stock.
In the year that the participant recognizes ordinary taxable
income in respect of such award, we will be entitled to a
deduction for federal income tax purposes equal to the amount of
ordinary income that the participant is required to recognize,
provided that the deduction is not otherwise disallowed under
Section 162(m).
Section 409A. If any award
constitutes nonqualified deferred compensation under
Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code, it will be
necessary that the award be structured to comply with
Section 409A to avoid the imposition of additional tax,
penalties and interest on the participant.
Tax Consequences of a Change of
Control. If, upon a change of control of our
company, the exercisability, vesting or payout of an award is
accelerated, any excess on the date of the change of control of
the fair market value of the shares or cash issued under
accelerated awards over the purchase price of such shares, if
any, may be characterized as parachute payments
(within the meaning of Section 280G of the Internal Revenue
Code) if the sum of such amounts and any other such contingent
payments received by the employee exceeds an amount equal to
three times the base amount for such employee. The
base amount generally is the average of the annual compensation
of the employee for the five years preceding such change in
ownership or control. An excess parachute payment,
with respect to any employee, is the excess of the parachute
payments to such person, in the aggregate, over and above such
persons base amount. If the
56
amounts received by an employee upon a change of control are
characterized as parachute payments, the employee will be
subject to a 20% excise tax on the excess parachute payment and
we will be denied any deduction with respect to such excess
parachute payment.
The foregoing discussion summarizes the federal income tax
consequences of awards that may be granted under the Amended and
Restated Plan based on current provisions of the Internal
Revenue Code, which are subject to change. This summary does not
cover any foreign, state or local tax consequences.
Payment of Withholding Taxes. We may
withhold from any payments or stock issuances under the Amended
and Restated Plan, or collect as a condition of payment, any
taxes required by law to be withheld. The participant may, but
is not required to, satisfy his or her withholding tax
obligation by electing to deliver currently owned shares of
common stock or to have our company withhold, from the shares
the participant would otherwise receive, shares, in each case
having a value equal to the minimum amount required to be
withheld. This election must be made prior to the date on which
the amount of tax to be withheld is determined.
Equity
Compensation Plan Information
The company has five equity compensation plans pursuant to which
our common stock may be issued to employees and non-employees as
compensation, excluding two plans that were assumed in
connection with our acquisition of Phelps Dodge pursuant to
which shares of restricted stock were previously issued. Only
the following three plans, all of which were previously approved
by our stockholders, have shares available for grant: the 2003
Stock Incentive Plan (the 2003 Plan), the
2004 Director Compensation Plan (the 2004
Plan), and the 2006 Stock Incentive Plan, which was
amended and restated in 2007 (the 2006 Plan). The
following table presents information as of December 31,
2009, regarding these equity compensation plans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of Securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remaining Available
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-Average
|
|
|
for Future Issuance
|
|
|
|
Number of Securities to be
|
|
|
Exercise Price of
|
|
|
Under Equity
|
|
|
|
Issued Upon Exercise of
|
|
|
Outstanding
|
|
|
Compensation Plans
|
|
|
|
Outstanding Options,
|
|
|
Options,
|
|
|
(Excluding Securities
|
|
|
|
Warrants and Rights
|
|
|
Warrants and Rights
|
|
|
Reflected in Column (a))
|
|
Plan Category
|
|
(a)
|
|
|
(b)
|
|
|
(c)
|
|
|
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders
|
|
|
13,819,944
|
(1)
|
|
$
|
55.36
|
|
|
|
25,247,939
|
(2)
|
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
13,819,944
|
(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,247,939
|
(2)
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The number of securities to be issued upon the exercise of
outstanding options, warrants and rights includes shares
issuable upon (a) the vesting of 1,390,999 restricted stock
units, and (b) the termination of deferrals with respect to
46,000 restricted stock units that were vested as of
December 31, 2009. These awards are not reflected in column
(b) as they do not have an exercise price. The number of
securities to be issued in column (a) does not include
outstanding stock appreciation rights, which are payable solely
in cash. |
|
(2) |
|
As of December 31, 2009, there were 25,220,308 shares
remaining available for future issuance under the 2006 Plan,
(a) all of which could be issued under the terms of the
plan upon the exercise of stock options or stock appreciation
rights, and (b) only 9,316,085 of which could be issued
under the terms of the plan in the form of restricted stock or
Other Stock-Based Awards, which awards are valued in
whole or in part on the value of the shares of common stock,
based on the plan limits prior to amendment of the 2006 Plan.
There were 24,348 shares remaining available for future
issuance under the 2003 Stock Incentive Plan, all of which could
be issued under the terms of the plan (a) upon the exercise
of stock options or stock appreciation rights, or (b) in
the form of restricted stock or Other Stock-Based
Awards. Finally, there were 3,283 shares remaining
available for future issuance under the 2004 Plan, which shares
are issuable under the terms of the plan (a) only to
eligible directors, and (b) upon the exercise of stock
options or in the form of common stock and restricted stock
units, as specifically set forth in the plan. |
57
In February 2010, the corporate personnel committee authorized
awards related to approximately 4 million shares of our
common stock under our equity incentive plans. Thus, there are
currently approximately 21 million shares remaining
available for future issuance under our equity compensation
plans to our officers, directors, employees, and key personnel.
The following table presents information as of March 31,
2010, regarding these equity compensation plans:
Equity
Compensation Plan Information as of March 31,
2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of Securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remaining Available
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-Average
|
|
|
for Future Issuance
|
|
|
|
Number of Securities to be
|
|
|
Exercise Price of
|
|
|
Under Equity
|
|
|
|
Issued Upon Exercise of
|
|
|
Outstanding
|
|
|
Compensation Plans
|
|
|
|
Outstanding Options,
|
|
|
Options,
|
|
|
(Excluding Securities
|
|
|
|
Warrants and Rights
|
|
|
Warrants and Rights
|
|
|
Reflected in Column (a))
|
|
Plan Category
|
|
(a)
|
|
|
(b)
|
|
|
(c)
|
|
|
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders
|
|
|
17,021,831
|
(1)
|
|
$
|
60.21
|
(2)
|
|
|
21,023,557
|
(3)
|
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
17,021,831
|
(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,023,557
|
(3)
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The number of securities to be issued upon the exercise of
outstanding options, warrants and rights includes shares
issuable upon (a) the exercise of 15,983,639 stock options,
(b) the vesting of 992,192 restricted stock units, and
(c) the termination of deferrals with respect to 46,000
restricted stock units that were vested as of March 31,
2010. The restricted stock units are not reflected in column
(b) as they do not have an exercise price. The number of
securities to be issued in column (a) does not include
outstanding stock appreciation rights, which are payable solely
in cash. |
|
(2) |
|
The weighted average remaining life of the 15,983,639
outstanding stock options as of March 31, 2010 is
7.9 years. |
|
(3) |
|
As of March 31, 2010, there were 21,017,357 shares
remaining available for future issuance under the 2006 Plan,
(a) all of which could be issued under the terms of the
plan upon the exercise of stock options or stock appreciation
rights, and (b) only 6,554,718 of which could be issued
under the terms of the plan in the form of restricted stock or
Other Stock-Based Awards, based on the
sub-limit
applicable to full-value awards under the proposed Amended and
Restated 2006 Plan. There were 4,098 shares remaining
available for future issuance under the 2003 Stock Incentive
Plan, all of which could be issued under the terms of the plan
(a) upon the exercise of stock options or stock
appreciation rights, or (b) in the form of restricted stock
or Other Stock-Based Awards. Finally, there were
2,102 shares remaining available for future issuance under
the 2004 Plan, which shares are issuable under the terms of the
plan (a) only to eligible directors, and (b) upon the
exercise of stock options or in the form of common stock and
restricted stock units, as specifically set forth in the plan. |
Awards to
Be Granted
Annual Grants to Non-Management and Advisory
Directors. Under the terms of the 2004 Plan,
each non-management and advisory director is automatically
granted stock options to acquire 10,000 shares of our
common stock and 2,000 restricted stock units on June 1 of each
year as long as a sufficient number of shares remain available
under the plan. As noted previously, however, the 2004 Plan is
almost depleted and there were insufficient shares remaining
available in June 2009 to support the annual restricted stock
unit grants to the non-management directors. Accordingly, in
December 2009 the board amended and restated the 2006 Stock
Incentive Plan, subject to stockholder approval, in order to add
non-management and advisory directors as participants, and
granted each non-management director 2,000 restricted stock
units under the Amended and Restated Plan. In addition, the
nominating and corporate governance committee intends to
continue the annual grant of stock options and restricted stock
units to non-management and advisory directors from the Amended
58
and Restated Plan. Accordingly, pursuant to its authority under
the Amended and Restated Plan, we anticipate that effective
June 1, 2010, the committee will grant each non-management
director stock options to acquire 10,000 shares of our
common stock and 2,000 restricted stock units. All of these
grants are conditioned on stockholder approval of the Amended
and Restated Plan at the annual meeting, and are summarized in
the table below. The table does not include awards granted under
the plan that were not contingent on approval of the Amended and
Restated Plan at the annual meeting.
New Plan Benefits under the Amended and Restated
Plan:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of Units
|
|
|
Number of Options
|
|
Name and Position
|
|
Granted(1)
|
|
|
Granted(2)
|
|
|
Executive Group
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-Executive Director Group
|
|
|
56,000
|
|
|
|
140,000
|
|
Non-Executive Officer Employee Group
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Represents grants of 2,000 restricted stock units to each
non-management director on each of December 8, 2009 and
June 1, 2010. The December 8, 2009 restricted stock
unit grants will vest in equal annual installments beginning on
July 1, 2010, and then on June 1 of 2011, 2012 and 2013.
The June 1, 2010 grant will vest ratably over the first
four anniversaries of the date of grant. |
|
(2) |
|
Represents stock options to be granted to each non-management
director on June 1, 2010. The option awards will have an
exercise price equal to the fair market value of our common
stock on June 1, 2010, will vest ratably over the first
four anniversaries of the date of grant, and will expire on
June 1, 2020. |
Other Grants. Other grants of awards
under the Amended and Restated Plan will be made in the future
by the committees as each deems appropriate.
Vote
Required for Adoption of the Amended and Restated 2006 Stock
Incentive Plan
Under our by-laws and New York Stock Exchange rules, adoption of
the Amended and Restated 2006 Plan requires the affirmative vote
of the holders of a majority of the shares of our common stock
present in person or by proxy at the meeting and entitled to
vote, and the total votes cast on the proposal must represent
more than 50% of our outstanding common stock entitled to vote
on the proposal as of the record date. For the purposes of
approving this proposal under the NYSE rules, broker non-votes
will be excluded from the tabulation of votes cast, and
therefore will not affect the outcome of the vote (except to the
extent such broker non-votes result in a failure to obtain total
votes cast on the proposal representing more than 50% of all
shares of our common stock entitled to vote on the proposal)
while abstentions will be included in the tabulation of votes
cast and count as votes against the proposal. Our board of
directors unanimously recommends a vote FOR the proposal to
adopt the Amended and Restated 2006 Stock Incentive Plan.
59
Stockholder
Proposal No. 1
We have received a stockholder proposal from Stichting
Pensioenfonds ABP (Netherlands), the Swedish national pension
funds AP1, AP2, AP3 and AP4, and the New York City Pension Funds
for presentation at our annual meeting of stockholders. Upon
request, we will provide the addresses of the proponents and the
number of shares of our common stock held by the proponents.
Requests may be sent to the Corporate Secretary,
Freeport-McMoRan Copper & Gold Inc., 333 North Central
Avenue, Phoenix, Arizona 85004 or submitted by calling
(602) 366-8100.
Approval of the proposal would require the affirmative vote of a
majority of the shares of our common stock present in person or
by proxy and entitled to vote thereon. Our board of
directors opposes Stockholder Proposal No. 1 for the
reasons stated following the proposal.
RESOLVED, that the shareholders request that, as the terms in
office of elected directors expire, at least one candidate shall
be selected and recommended for election to the companys
board who:
|
|
|
|
(i)
|
has a high level of expertise and experience in environmental
matters relevant to mining and is widely recognized in the
business and environmental communities as an authority in such
field, in each case as reasonably determined by the
companys board, and
|
|
|
(ii)
|
will qualify, subject to limited exceptions in extraordinary
circumstances explicitly specified by the board, as an
independent director under the standards applicable to the
company as a New York Stock Exchange listed company,
|
in order that the companys board includes at least one
director satisfying the foregoing criteria, which director shall
have designated responsibility on the board for environmental
matters.
Supporting
statement
Environmental expertise is critical to the success of mining
companies in the twenty-first century because of the significant
environmental impacts mining can have. Shareholders, lenders,
host country governments and regulators, as well as affected
communities, are focused on the environmental impact of mining
operations. A companys inability to demonstrate that its
environmental performance matches internationally accepted
standards can lead to difficulties in accessing capital for new
projects and obtaining the necessary regulatory licenses.
The company continues to receive sharp criticism regarding its
environmental policies and practices, notably over the impact of
riverine tailings disposal at its Grasberg operation (see e.g.,
Norway Sells $853 Million Rio Stake on Ethics Grounds,
http://www.marketwatch.com/news/story/story.aspx?guid=%7bBDE96994
-B8D8-4A33-8ECD-0789B0763BED%7d&siteid=rss).
We believe that this controversy damages shareholder value and
that the company must respond to its environmental challenges in
an effective, strategic and transparent manner in order to
restore trust in the company and minimize the adverse
environmental impact of its operations.
Freeport does not currently have an independent director with
environmental expertise and designated responsibility for
environmental matters yet environmental management
is critical to the companys future success. We believe it
would benefit the company to address the environmental impact of
its business at the most strategic level in a similar manner to
the way it has addressed human rights by appointing
a specialist to the board. An authoritative figure with
acknowledged environmental expertise and standing who is
respected in the environmental community could perform a
valuable and strategic role for the company. Such leadership
would enable the company more effectively to address the
environmental issues inherent in its business, including the
environmental and health impacts of riverine tailings disposal
and the feasibility of long-term rehabilitation of the tailings
deposition area at Grasberg. It would also help ensure that the
highest levels of attention are devoted to environmental
standards at new developments. Such a board role would
strengthen the companys ability to demonstrate the
seriousness with which it is addressing environmental issues.
60
Board of
Directors Statement in Opposition to Stockholder
Proposal No. 1
Our board of directors opposes the proposal because it believes
the current process for the nomination, selection and election
of directors is effective. As a corporate governance matter, our
board does not believe that it is in our shareholders best
interests to require a particular type of specialist on our
board. As provided in more detail under Consideration of
Director Nominees, our nominating and corporate governance
committee considers a variety of factors in evaluating nominees
for membership on the board. We believe that our board of
directors represents a diverse group of individuals with broad
experience. Our board of directors believes that the sole
standard suggested by the proponents is too narrow and would
limit the boards ability to identify and recruit the most
qualified candidates to serve on the board.
Our existing commitment to environmental sustainability is
evidenced by our established policies, practices and procedures.
Our board of directors appreciates the importance of
environmental sustainability and recognizes our companys
responsibility to minimize the environmental impact of our
operations. Relevant issues are reviewed and discussed at the
highest levels of our organization. In 1995, our board of
directors established a public policy committee, which oversees
our companys environmental programs. Our board of
directors, our public policy committee and our senior management
routinely review our companys environmental policies and
practices, including any potential impacts that our
companys operations could have on the environment. In
addition, our Chief Executive Officer currently serves as
Chairman of the International Council of Mining and Metals, a
CEO-led organization that represents many of the worlds
leading mining and metals companies. Our involvement with ICMM
exemplifies our commitment to working with industry experts on
improving our performance based on sustainable development
principles.
We have consistently met internationally acceptable standards
for environmental management. Our Grasberg operation has
undergone triennial external audits by recognized experts in the
industry, the results of which have been made publicly
available. We completed independent audits in 1996, 1999, 2002,
2005 and 2008. The results of the 2005 and 2008 audits are
posted on our web site. All of these audits have concluded that
(1) we are in compliance with Indonesian laws, (2) we
meet international standards, and (3) our tailings
management plan is the only appropriate management system
considering the applicable geotechnical, topographic,
climatological, seismic, and rainfall conditions. We also were
one of the first companies in Indonesia to receive ISO 14001
certification of our Environmental Management System in 2001
from the International Certification Services Division of
Société Générale de Surveillance (SGS). We
have retained ISO 14001 certification following annual
surveillance audits each year since that date.
We are committed to sound and sustainable environmental
practices in managing our tailings deposition in Papua,
Indonesia. We have prepared a special riverine tailings report,
available on our web site at
www.fcx.com/envir/pdf/riverine/Riverine_2009.pdf. This
report explains the extensive studies, planning, permitting, and
ongoing management and monitoring of tailings that occurs,
including our efforts for reclaiming affected land as soon as
feasible. In addition, our annual Working Toward Sustainable
Development report, available on our web site at
www.fcx.com/envir/index.htm, details our environmental
management programs and compliance with relevant environmental
laws and regulations and describes our procedures to ensure
future compliance with these laws. Our reclamation programs have
demonstrated that tailings can be reclaimed with native
vegetation or used for agricultural purposes. We have also shown
that tailings can be used in cement for infrastructure
construction. We have signed an agreement with the provincial
government to establish cement facilities that will utilize
tailings as a resource in the construction of roads, bridges,
building bricks and other similar uses, helping to provide
necessary infrastructure that will aid in the development of the
province, as well as employment for Papuans. This development
will proceed in conjunction with our other efforts to plant
trees and use available tailings land for agricultural and other
sustainable uses.
Our companys existing governance framework has produced a
strong commitment to environmental sustainability and progress
that is evident in our established policies, practices and
procedures, which continue to evolve. Thus, we believe this
proposal suggests action that is unnecessary in light of our
existing commitment to environmental sustainability, and
adopting the proposed resolution would be contrary to the
interests of our company and its stockholders. For the
reasons set forth above, our board of directors unanimously
recommends a vote AGAINST the adoption of Stockholder
Proposal No. 1.
61
Stockholder
Proposal No. 2
We have received a stockholder proposal from The
Firefighters Pension System of the City of Kansas City,
Missouri, Trust, for presentation at our annual meeting of
stockholders. Upon request, we will provide the address of the
proponent and the number of shares of our common stock held by
the proponent. Requests may be sent to the Corporate Secretary,
Freeport-McMoRan Copper & Gold Inc., 333 North Central
Avenue, Phoenix, Arizona 85004 or submitted by calling
(602) 366-8100.
Approval of the proposal would require the affirmative vote of a
majority of the shares of our common stock present in person or
by proxy and entitled to vote thereon. Our board of
directors opposes Stockholder Proposal No. 2 for the
reasons stated following the proposal.
Resolved, that stockholders of Freeport-McMoRan
Copper & Gold, Inc. (Company) urge the
Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors (the
Committee) to adopt a policy requiring that senior
executives retain a significant percentage of shares acquired
through equity compensation programs until two years following
the termination of their employment (through retirement or
otherwise), and to report to stockholders regarding the policy
before the Companys 2011 annual meeting of stockholders.
The stockholders recommend that the Committee not adopt a
percentage lower than 75% of net after-tax shares. The policy
should address the permissibility of transactions such as
hedging transactions which are not sales but reduce the risk of
loss to the executive.
Supporting
Statement
Equity-based compensation is an important component of senior
executive compensation at Company. According to the information
in the 2009 Proxy Statement, as of April 14, 2009 the
Chairman of the Board owned 1,448,308 shares of Company
stock and as of December 31, 2008 had outstanding equity
awards totaling 1,673,505 shares. The 2009 Proxy Statement
also shows that as of April 14, 2009, the President/CEO
owned 694,522 shares of Company stock and as of
December 31, 2008, had outstanding equity awards totaling
2,463,233 shares.
The Companys Compensation Committee has established stock
ownership guidelines for its named executive officers that are
based on a multiple of base salaries (five times for the
Chairman and President/CEO, three times for other executive
officers). All the named executive officers had satisfied the
ownership guidelines, according to the 2009 Proxy Statement.
However, the Company has no requirement that its executives
retain any of their shares following termination of employment.
We believe requiring senior executives to hold a significant
portion of shares obtained through compensation plans after the
termination of employment would focus them on Company long-term
success and would better align their interests with those of
Company stockholders. In the context of the current financial
crisis, we believe it is imperative that companies reshape their
compensation policies and practices to discourage excessive
risk-taking and promote long-term, sustainable value creation. A
2002 report by a commission of The Conference Board endorsed the
idea of a holding requirement, stating that the long-term focus
promoted thereby may help prevent companies from
artificially propping up stock prices over the short-term to
cash out options and making other potentially negative
short-term decisions.
We believe the Companys current policy of the named
executive officers owning multiples of their bases salaries in
stock does not go far enough to ensure that equity compensation
builds executive ownership. We also view a retention requirement
approach as superior to a stock ownership guideline because a
guideline loses effectiveness once it has been satisfied.
We urge stockholders to vote for this proposal.
62
Board of
Directors Statement in Opposition to Stockholder
Proposal No. 2
Our board of directors opposes the adoption of this stockholder
proposal because it believes that it is unnecessary and not in
the best interests of our stockholders.
Our board of directors shares the proponents view that it
is important to ensure that our executive compensation program
gives management an incentive to maximize long-term stockholder
value, but we disagree with the proposed method of achieving
that goal. We believe that our existing stock ownership
guidelines, coupled with our carefully designed executive
compensation program, already ensure meaningful executive stock
ownership, align management and stockholder interests and
promote a focus on long-term, sustainable value creation, as
evidenced by our track record. As of December 31, 2009, our
cumulative total stockholder return had exceeded the performance
of both the S&P 500 Stock Index and the S&P 500
Minerals Index for four of the last five years.
Stock
Ownership Guidelines
Our board believes that stock ownership by executive officers
aligns their interests with the long-term interests of our
stockholders and sends a positive message regarding
managements commitment to long-term stockholder value
creation. Our stock ownership guidelines are in place for all of
our executive officers. Under the guidelines, which are
described in this proxy statement, each of our executive
officers must own a number of shares of our common stock
equivalent in value to a certain multiple of his or her base
salary. For our Chairman of the Board and our President and
Chief Executive Officer, that multiple is five times their base
salary, and for our other executive officers the multiple is
three times their base salary. As of December 31, 2009, the
stock ownership of each of our executive officers was in excess
of the guidelines, with our Chairman of the Board owning stock
valued at 36 times his base salary (approximately seven times
his target ownership level), and our President and Chief
Executive Officer owning stock valued at 29 times his base
salary (approximately six times his target ownership level),
reflecting commitments to align their interests with those of
our stockholders.
In setting our stock ownership guidelines, we endeavor to strike
an appropriate balance between ensuring that our executives have
a significant investment in the future of our company, while
also allowing them to prudently manage their financial affairs
through the ability, in common with other investors, to
diversify their holdings over an extended period, and through
the ability, in common with our other employees, to realize
value from the equity component of their compensation while they
remain with our company. We believe that requiring executives to
hold 75% of their after-tax equity awards for the entire period
of employment, and beyond, upsets this balance, is arguably
punitive, and could create perverse incentives for talented
executives to terminate employment prematurely.
Equity
Compensation Program
As stated above, we believe it is important to align the
interests of our executive officers with the long-term interests
of our stockholders, and our corporate personnel committee has
designed the equity component of our compensation program with
that goal in mind. Our executive equity compensation programs
account for a significant portion of our executives annual
total compensation and include the following elements to
encourage our executives continuing interest in our
long-term performance:
|
|
|
|
|
The options granted to our executives have a four-year vesting
schedule, with 25% vesting each year following the grant date.
This results in executives having a strong interest in ensuring
that our stock value continues to grow for several years, and
because options are now awarded annually, that incentive remains
in effect during the executives entire tenure.
|
|
|
|
The options received by our executives have an exercise price
equal to the fair market value of our stock price on the grant
date. Accordingly, our executives have a significant downside
risk to the value of their option awards if the price of our
stock falls in the long run.
|
|
|
|
Pursuant to our 2009 Annual Incentive Plan, which was approved
by our stockholders in 2009, the cash incentive award payable to
each of our executive officers may not exceed four times the
|
63
|
|
|
|
|
officers base salary. Any amount paid above that will be
paid in an equivalent number of restricted stock units, or RSUs,
not to exceed eight times the officers base salary. These
RSUs vest ratably over a three-year period, and are subject to
achievement of a performance goal that will result in forfeiture
of the award if the goal is not met on each vesting date. Thus,
a portion of the executives annual cash award continues to
be at risk and will lose value if our common stock decreases in
value over time.
|
Together, these features result in executives realizing
significant value from their equity compensation only if our
stock price both rises and sustains its growth over time.
We believe that the proposed retention policy could diminish our
ability to attract and retain talented executives that are
critical to our long-term success. Our corporate personnel
committee seeks to ensure that our equity compensation programs
are structured both to give the executives a significant
long-term interest in our success and to create a significant
retention tool for key executives in a competitive market for
talent. If our corporate personnel committee were to adopt a
policy requiring executives to hold significant portions of
their equity awards for two years beyond termination of
employment, our senior executives and prospective executive
candidates would be prohibited from realizing a substantial
portion of the value of their compensation during the course of
their employment. We believe that our existing equity
compensation policies and practices, coupled with our stock
ownership guidelines, enable our executive officers to realize
value from their equity compensation while at the same time
ensuring that they remain motivated to act in the interests of
our long-term growth and financial success. For the
reasons set forth above, our board of directors unanimously
recommends a vote AGAINST adoption of Stockholder
Proposal No. 2.
64
ANNEX A
FREEPORT-McMoRan
COPPER & GOLD INC.
AMENDED AND RESTATED 2006 STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN
SECTION 1
Purpose. The purpose of the Amended and
Restated Freeport-McMoRan Copper & Gold Inc. 2006
Stock Incentive Plan (the Plan) is to increase
stockholder value and advance the interests of the Company and
its Subsidiaries by furnishing a variety of equity incentives
designed to (i) attract, retain, and motivate key
employees, officers, and directors of the Company and
consultants and advisers to the Company and (ii) strengthen
the mutuality of interests among such persons and the
Companys stockholders.
SECTION 2
Definitions. As used in the Plan, the
following terms shall have the meanings set forth below:
Award shall mean any Option, Stock Appreciation
Right, Restricted Stock, Restricted Stock Unit, or Other
Stock-Based Award.
Award Agreement shall mean any written or electronic
notice of grant, agreement, contract or other instrument or
document evidencing any Award, which the Company may, but need
not, require a Participant to execute, acknowledge, or accept.
Board shall mean the Board of Directors of the
Company.
Code shall mean the Internal Revenue Code of 1986,
as amended from time to time.
Committee refers to the Corporate Personnel
Committee of the Board, the Nominating and Corporate Governance
Committee of the Board, or both of these committees, as the
context indicates.
Common Stock shall mean the Companys common
stock, $.10 par value per share.
Company shall mean Freeport-McMoRan
Copper & Gold Inc.
Designated Beneficiary shall mean the beneficiary
designated by the Participant, in a manner determined by the
Committee, to receive the benefits due the Participant under the
Plan in the event of the Participants death. In the
absence of an effective designation by the Participant,
Designated Beneficiary shall mean the Participants estate.
Eligible Individual shall mean (i) any person
providing services as an officer of the Company or a Subsidiary,
whether or not employed by such entity, including any such
person who is also a director of the Company; (ii) any
employee of the Company or a Subsidiary, including any director
who is also an employee of the Company or a Subsidiary;
(iii) Outside Directors; (iv) any officer or employee
of an entity with which the Company has contracted to receive
executive, management, or legal services who provides services
to the Company or a Subsidiary through such arrangement;
(v) any consultant or adviser to the Company, a Subsidiary,
or to an entity described in clause (iv) hereof who
provides services to the Company or a Subsidiary through such
arrangement; and (vi) any person who has agreed in writing
to become a person described in clauses (i), (ii), (iii),
(iv) or (v) within not more than 30 days
following the date of grant of such persons first Award
under the Plan.
Exchange Act shall mean the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934, as amended from time to time.
Immediate Family Members shall mean the spouse and
natural or adopted children or grandchildren of the Participant
and his or her spouse.
Incentive Stock Option shall mean an option granted
under Section 6 of the Plan that is intended to meet the
requirements of Section 422 of the Code or any successor
provision thereto.
A-1
Nonqualified Stock Option shall mean an option
granted under Section 6 of the Plan that is not intended to
be an Incentive Stock Option.
Option shall mean an Incentive Stock Option or a
Nonqualified Stock Option.
Other Stock-Based Award shall mean any right or
award granted under Section 10 of the Plan.
Outside Directors shall mean members of the Board
who are not employees of the Company, and shall include
non-voting advisory directors to the Board.
Participant shall mean any Eligible Individual
granted an Award under the Plan.
Person shall mean any individual, corporation,
partnership, limited liability company, association, joint-stock
company, trust, unincorporated organization, government or
political subdivision thereof, or other entity.
Restricted Stock shall mean any restricted stock
granted under Section 8 of the Plan.
Restricted Stock Unit shall mean any restricted
stock unit granted under Section 9 of the Plan.
Section 162(m) shall mean Section 162(m)
of the Code and all regulations and guidance promulgated
thereunder as in effect from time to time.
Section 409A shall mean Section 409A of
the Code and all regulations and guidance promulgated thereunder
as in effect from time to time.
Shares shall mean the shares of Common Stock and
such other securities of the Company or a Subsidiary as the
Committee may from time to time designate.
Stock Appreciation Right shall mean any right
granted under Section 7 of the Plan.
Subsidiary shall mean (i) any corporation or
other entity in which the Company possesses directly or
indirectly equity interests representing at least 50% of the
total ordinary voting power or at least 50% of the total value
of all classes of equity interests of such corporation or other
entity and (ii) any other entity in which the Company has a
direct or indirect economic interest that is designated as a
Subsidiary by the Committee.
SECTION 3
(a) Administration. The Plan shall
generally be administered by the Corporate Personnel Committee.
The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee of the Board
shall administer the Plan with respect to grants to Outside
Directors. Members of the Corporate Personnel Committee and the
Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee shall qualify as
non-employee directors under
Rule 16b-3
under the Exchange Act.
(b) Authority. Subject to the terms of
the Plan and applicable law, and in addition to other express
powers and authorizations conferred on the Committee by the
Plan, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee (with
respect to Outside Directors) and the Corporate Personnel
Committee (with respect to all other Eligible Individuals) shall
have full power and authority to: (i) designate
Participants; (ii) determine the type or types of Awards to
be granted to an Eligible Individual; (iii) determine the
number of Shares to be covered by, or with respect to which
payments, rights, or other matters are to be calculated in
connection with, Awards; (iv) determine the terms and
conditions of any Award; (v) determine whether, to what
extent, and under what circumstances Awards may be settled or
exercised in cash, whole Shares, other whole securities, other
Awards, other property, or other cash amounts payable by the
Company upon the exercise of that or other Awards, or canceled,
forfeited, or suspended and the method or methods by which
Awards may be settled, exercised, canceled, forfeited, or
suspended; (vi) determine whether, to what extent, and
under what circumstances cash, Shares, other securities, other
Awards, other property, and other amounts payable by the Company
with respect to an Award shall be deferred either automatically
or at the election of the holder thereof or of the Committee;
(vii) interpret and administer the Plan and any instrument
or agreement relating
A-2
to, or Award made under, the Plan; (viii) establish, amend,
suspend, or waive such rules and regulations and appoint such
agents as it shall deem appropriate for the proper
administration of the Plan; and (ix) make any other
determination and take any other action that the Committee deems
necessary or desirable for the administration of the Plan.
(c) Effect of Committees
Determinations. Unless otherwise expressly
provided in the Plan, all designations, determinations,
interpretations, and other decisions under or with respect to
the Plan or any Award shall be within the sole discretion of the
applicable Committee, may be made at any time and shall be
final, conclusive, and binding upon all Persons, including the
Company, any Subsidiary, any Participant, any holder or
beneficiary of any Award, any stockholder of the Company, and
any Eligible Individual.
(d) Delegation. Subject to the terms of
the Plan and applicable law, the Committee may delegate to one
or more officers of the Company the authority, subject to such
terms and limitations as the Committee shall determine, to grant
and set the terms of, to cancel, modify, or waive rights with
respect to, or to alter, discontinue, suspend, or terminate
Awards held by Eligible Individuals who are not officers or
directors of the Company for purposes of Section 16 of the
Exchange Act, or any successor section thereto, or who are
otherwise not subject to such Section; provided, however, that
the per share exercise price of any Option granted under this
Section 3(d) shall be equal to the fair market value of the
underlying Shares on the date of grant.
SECTION 4
Eligibility. The Committee, in accordance with
Section 3(a), may grant an Award under the Plan to any
Eligible Individual.
SECTION 5
(a) Shares Available for
Awards. Subject to adjustment as provided in
Section 5(b):
(i) Calculation of Number of Shares Available.
(A) Subject to the other provisions of this
Section 5(a), the number of Shares with respect to which
Awards payable in Shares may be granted under the Plan shall be
37,000,000. Awards that by their terms may be settled only in
cash shall not be counted against the maximum number of Shares
provided herein.
(B) The number of Shares that may be issued pursuant to
Incentive Stock Options may not exceed 37,000,000.
(C) Subject to the other provisions of this
Section 5(a):
(1) the maximum number of Shares issuable under the Plan as
Restricted Stock, Restricted Stock Units, or Other Stock-Based
Awards payable in Shares for which there is a per share purchase
price that is less than 100% of the fair market value of the
securities to which the Award relates shall be
8,500,000; and
(2) up to 1,500,000 of the Shares referenced in
Section 5(a)(i)(C)(1) may be issued pursuant to Awards to
employees, consultants, or advisers in the form of Restricted
Stock, Restricted Stock Units, or Other Stock-Based Awards
payable in Shares without compliance with the minimum vesting
periods set forth in Sections 8(b), 9(b), and 10(b),
respectively. If (x) Restricted Stock, Restricted Stock
Units, or an Other Stock-Based Award is granted with a minimum
vesting period of at least three years or a minimum vesting
period of at least one year, subject to the attainment of
specific performance goals, and (y) the vesting of such
Award is accelerated in accordance with Section 12(a)
hereof as a result of the Participants death, retirement,
or other termination of employment or cessation of consulting or
advisory services to the Company, or a change of control of the
Company, such Shares shall not count against the limitation
described in this Section 5(a)(i)(C)(2).
A-3
(D) To the extent any Shares covered by an Award are not
issued because the Award is forfeited or canceled or the Award
is settled in cash, such Shares shall again be available for
grant pursuant to new Awards under the Plan.
(E) In the event that Shares are issued as Restricted Stock
or Other Stock-Based Awards under the Plan and thereafter are
forfeited or reacquired by the Company pursuant to rights
reserved upon issuance thereof, such Shares shall again be
available for grant pursuant to new Awards under the Plan. With
respect to Stock Appreciation Rights, if the Award is payable in
Shares, all Shares to which the Award relates are counted
against the Plan limits, rather than the net number of Shares
delivered upon exercise of the Award.
(F) The maximum value of an Other Stock-Based Award that is
valued in dollars (whether or not paid in Common Stock)
scheduled to be paid out to any one Participant in any calendar
year shall be $5 million.
(ii) Shares Deliverable Under
Awards. Any Shares delivered pursuant to an Award
may consist of authorized and unissued Shares or of treasury
Shares, including Shares held by the Company or a Subsidiary and
Shares acquired in the open market or otherwise obtained by the
Company or a Subsidiary. The issuance of Shares may be effected
on a non-certificated basis, to the extent not prohibited by
applicable law or the applicable rules of any stock exchange.
(iii) Individual Limits. The maximum
number of Shares that may be covered by Awards granted under the
Plan to any Participant during a calendar year shall be
3,750,000 Shares.
(iv) Use of Shares. Subject to the terms
of the Plan and the overall limitation on the number of Shares
that may be delivered under the Plan, the Committee may use
available Shares as the form of payment for compensation,
grants, or rights earned or due under any other compensation
plans or arrangements of the Company or a Subsidiary, including,
but not limited to, the Companys annual incentive plan and
the plans or arrangements of the Company or a Subsidiary assumed
in business combinations.
(b) Adjustments. In the event that the
Committee determines that any dividend or other distribution
(whether in the form of cash, Shares, Subsidiary securities,
other securities, or other property), recapitalization, stock
split, reverse stock split, reorganization, merger,
consolidation,
split-up,
spin-off, combination, repurchase, or exchange of Shares or
other securities of the Company, issuance of warrants or other
rights to purchase Shares or other securities of the Company, or
other similar corporate transaction or event affects the Shares
such that an adjustment is determined by the Committee to be
appropriate to prevent dilution or enlargement of the benefits
or potential benefits intended to be made available under the
Plan, then the Committee shall, in such manner as it may deem
equitable, adjust any or all of (i) the number and type of
Shares (or other securities or property) with respect to which
Awards may be granted, (ii) the number and type of Shares
(or other securities or property) subject to outstanding Awards,
and (iii) the grant or exercise price with respect to any
Award and, if deemed appropriate, make provision for a cash
payment to the holder of an outstanding Award and, if deemed
appropriate, adjust outstanding Awards to provide the rights
contemplated by Section 11(b) hereof; provided, in
each case, that with respect to Awards of Incentive Stock
Options no such adjustment shall be authorized to the extent
that such authority would cause the Plan to violate
Section 422(b)(1) of the Code or any successor provision
thereto and, with respect to all Awards under the Plan, no such
adjustment shall be authorized to the extent that such authority
would be inconsistent with the requirements for full
deductibility under Section 162(m); and provided
further that the number of Shares subject to any Award
denominated in Shares shall always be a whole number.
(c) Performance Goals for Section 162(m)
Awards. The Committee shall determine at the time
of grant if the grant of Restricted Stock, Restricted Stock
Units, or an Other Stock-Based Award is intended to qualify as
performance-based compensation as that term is used
in Section 162(m). Any such grant shall be conditioned on
the achievement of one or more performance measures. The
performance measures pursuant to which Restricted Stock,
Restricted Stock Units, and Other Stock-Based Awards shall vest
shall be any or a combination of the following: earnings per
share, return on assets, an economic value added measure,
shareholder return, earnings, return on equity, return on
investment, cash provided by operating activities, increase in
cash flow, return on cash flow, or increase in production of the
Company, a division of the
A-4
Company or a Subsidiary. For any performance period, such
performance objectives may be measured on an absolute basis or
relative to a group of peer companies selected by the Committee,
relative to internal goals or relative to levels attained in
prior years. For grants of Restricted Stock, Restricted Stock
Units, and Other Stock-Based Awards intended to qualify as
performance-based compensation, the grants and the
establishment of performance measures shall be made during the
period required by Section 162(m).
SECTION 6
(a) Stock Options. Subject to the
provisions of the Plan, the Committee shall have sole and
complete authority to determine the Eligible Individuals to whom
Options shall be granted, the number of Shares to be covered by
each Option, the option price thereof, the conditions and
limitations applicable to the exercise of the Option, and the
other terms thereof. The Committee shall have the authority to
grant Incentive Stock Options, Nonqualified Stock Options, or
both. In the case of Incentive Stock Options, the terms and
conditions of such grants shall be subject to and comply with
such rules as may be required by Section 422 of the Code,
as from time to time amended, and any implementing regulations.
Except in the case of an Option granted in assumption of or
substitution for an outstanding award of a company acquired by
the Company or with which the Company combines, the exercise
price of any Option granted under this Plan shall not be less
than 100% of the fair market value of the underlying Shares on
the date of grant.
(b) Exercise. Each Option shall be
exercisable at such times and subject to such terms and
conditions as the Committee may, in its sole discretion, specify
in the applicable Award Agreement or thereafter, provided,
however, that in no event may any Option granted hereunder be
exercisable after the expiration of 10 years after the date
of such grant. The Committee may impose such conditions with
respect to the exercise of Options, including without
limitation, any condition relating to the application of Federal
or state securities laws, as it may deem necessary or advisable.
An Option may be exercised, in whole or in part, by giving
written notice to the Company, specifying the number of Shares
to be purchased. The exercise notice shall be accompanied by the
full purchase price for the Shares.
(c) Payment. The Option price shall be
payable in United States dollars and may be paid by
(i) cash or cash equivalent; (ii) delivery of shares
of Common Stock, which shares shall be valued for this purpose
at the fair market value (valued in accordance with procedures
established by the Committee) as of the effective date of such
exercise; (iii) delivery of irrevocable written
instructions to a broker approved by the Company (with a copy to
the Company) to immediately sell a portion of the shares
issuable under the Option and to deliver promptly to the Company
the amount of sale proceeds to pay the exercise price;
(iv) if approved by the Committee, through a net exercise
procedure whereby the Participant surrenders the Option in
exchange for that number of shares of Common Stock with an
aggregate fair market value equal to the difference between the
aggregate exercise price of the Options being surrendered and
the aggregate fair market value of the shares of Common Stock
subject to the Option; or (v) in such other manner as may
be authorized from time to time by the Committee. Prior to the
issuance of Shares upon the exercise of an Option, a Participant
shall have no rights as a shareholder.
SECTION 7
(a) Stock Appreciation Rights. A Stock
Appreciation Right shall entitle the holder thereof to receive
upon exercise, for each Share to which the Stock Appreciation
Right relates, an amount equal to the excess, if any, of the
fair market value of a Share on the date of exercise of the
Stock Appreciation Right over the grant price.
(b) Terms and Conditions. Subject to the
provisions of the Plan, the Committee shall have sole and
complete authority to determine the Eligible Individuals to whom
Stock Appreciation Rights shall be granted, the number of Shares
to be covered by each Award of Stock Appreciation Rights, the
grant price thereof, the conditions and limitations applicable
to the exercise of the Stock Appreciation Right and the other
terms thereof. Stock Appreciation Rights may be granted in
tandem with another Award, in addition to another Award, or
freestanding and unrelated to any other Award. Stock
Appreciation Rights granted in tandem with or in addition to an
Option or other Award may be granted either at the same time as
the Option or other
A-5
Award or at a later time. Stock Appreciation Rights shall not be
exercisable after the expiration of 10 years after the date
of grant. Except in the case of a Stock Appreciation Right
granted in assumption of or substitution for an outstanding
award of a company acquired by the Company or with which the
Company combines, the grant price of any Stock Appreciation
Right granted under this Plan shall not be less than 100% of the
fair market value of the Shares covered by such Stock
Appreciation Right on the date of grant or, in the case of a
Stock Appreciation Right granted in tandem with a then
outstanding Option or other Award, on the date of grant of such
related Option or Award.
(c) Committee Discretion to Determine Form of
Payment. The Committee shall determine at the
time of grant of a Stock Appreciation Right whether it shall be
settled in cash, Shares, or a combination of cash and Shares.
SECTION 8
(a) Restricted Stock. Subject to the
provisions of the Plan, the Committee shall have sole and
complete authority to determine the Eligible Individuals to whom
Restricted Stock shall be granted, the number of Shares to be
covered by each Award of Restricted Stock and the terms,
conditions, and limitations applicable thereto. An Award of
Restricted Stock may be subject to the attainment of specified
performance goals or targets, restrictions on transfer,
forfeitability provisions and such other terms and conditions as
the Committee may determine, subject to the provisions of the
Plan. An award of Restricted Stock may be made in lieu of the
payment of cash compensation otherwise due to an Eligible
Individual. To the extent that Restricted Stock is intended to
qualify as performance-based compensation under
Section 162(m), it must be made subject to the attainment
of one or more of the performance goals specified in
Section 5(c) hereof and meet the additional requirements
imposed by Section 162(m).
(b) The Restricted Period. At the time
that an Award of Restricted Stock is made, the Committee shall
establish a period of time during which the transfer of the
Shares of Restricted Stock shall be restricted (the
Restricted Period). Each Award of Restricted Stock
may have a different Restricted Period. Except (i) for
Restricted Stock that vests based on the attainment of
performance goals, and (ii) as provided in
Section 5(a)(i)(C)(2), a Restricted Period of at least
three years is required with incremental vesting of the Award
over the three-year period permitted. If the grant or vesting of
the Shares is subject to the attainment of specified performance
goals, a Restricted Period of at least one year with incremental
vesting is permitted. The expiration of the Restricted Period
shall also occur as provided in the Award Agreement in
accordance with Section 12(a) hereof.
(c) Escrow. The Participant receiving
Restricted Stock shall enter into an Award Agreement with the
Company setting forth the conditions of the grant. Certificates
representing Shares of Restricted Stock shall be registered in
the name of the Participant and deposited with the Company,
together with a stock power endorsed in blank by the
Participant. Each such certificate shall bear a legend in
substantially the following form:
The transferability of this certificate and the shares of Common
Stock represented by it are subject to the terms and conditions
(including conditions of forfeiture) contained in the
Freeport-McMoRan Copper & Gold Inc. Amended and
Restated 2006 Stock Incentive Plan (the Plan) and a
notice of grant issued thereunder to the registered owner by
Freeport-McMoRan Copper & Gold Inc. Copies of the Plan
and the notice of grant are on file at the principal office of
Freeport-McMoRan Copper & Gold Inc.
Alternatively, in the discretion of the Company, ownership of
the Shares of Restricted Stock and the appropriate restrictions
shall be reflected in the records of the Companys transfer
agent and no physical certificates shall be issued prior to
vesting.
(d) Dividends on Restricted Stock. Any
and all cash and stock dividends paid with respect to the Shares
of Restricted Stock shall be subject to any restrictions on
transfer, forfeitability provisions or reinvestment requirements
as the Committee may, in its discretion, prescribe in the Award
Agreement.
(e) Forfeiture. In the event of the
forfeiture of any Shares of Restricted Stock under the terms
provided in the Award Agreement (including any additional Shares
of Restricted Stock that may result from
A-6
the reinvestment of cash and stock dividends, if so provided in
the Award Agreement), such forfeited shares shall be surrendered
and any certificates canceled. The Participants shall have the
same rights and privileges, and be subject to the same
forfeiture provisions, with respect to any additional Shares
received pursuant to Section 5(b) or Section 11(b) due
to a recapitalization, merger or other change in capitalization.
(f) Expiration of Restricted Period. Upon
the expiration or termination of the Restricted Period and the
satisfaction of any other conditions prescribed by the Committee
or at such earlier time as provided in the Award Agreement or an
amendment thereto, the restrictions applicable to the Restricted
Stock shall lapse and a stock certificate for the number of
Shares of Restricted Stock with respect to which the
restrictions have lapsed shall be delivered or book or
electronic entry evidencing ownership shall be provided, free of
all such restrictions and legends, except any that may be
imposed by law, to the Participant or the Participants
estate, as the case may be.
(g) Rights as a Stockholder. Subject to
the terms and conditions of the Plan and subject to any
restrictions on the receipt of dividends that may be imposed in
the Award Agreement, each Participant receiving Restricted Stock
shall have all the rights of a stockholder with respect to
Shares of stock during any period in which such Shares are
subject to forfeiture and restrictions on transfer, including
without limitation, the right to vote such Shares.
SECTION 9
(a) Restricted Stock Units. Subject to
the provisions of the Plan, the Committee shall have sole and
complete authority to determine the Eligible Individuals to whom
Restricted Stock Units shall be granted, the number of Shares to
be covered by each Award of Restricted Stock Units and the
terms, conditions, and limitations applicable thereto. An Award
of Restricted Stock Units is a right to receive shares of Common
Stock in the future and may be subject to the attainment of
specified performance goals or targets, restrictions on
transfer, forfeitability provisions and such other terms and
conditions as the Committee may determine, subject to the
provisions of the Plan. An award of Restricted Stock Units may
be made in lieu of the payment of cash compensation otherwise
due to an Eligible Individual. To the extent that an Award of
Restricted Stock Units is intended to qualify as
performance-based compensation under
Section 162(m), it must be made subject to the attainment
of one or more of the performance goals specified in
Section 5(c) hereof and meet the additional requirements
imposed by Section 162(m).
(b) The Vesting Period. At the time that
an Award of Restricted Stock Units is made, the Committee shall
establish a period of time during which the Restricted Stock
Units shall vest. Each Award of Restricted Stock may have a
different vesting period. Except (i) for Restricted Stock
Units that vest based on the attainment of performance goals,
and (ii) as provided in Section 5(a)(i)(C)(2), a
vesting period of at least three years is required with
incremental vesting of the Award over the three-year period
permitted. If the grant or vesting is subject to the attainment
of specified performance goals, a vesting period of at least one
year with incremental vesting is permitted. The expiration of
the vesting period shall also occur as provided in the Award
Agreement in accordance with Section 12(a) hereof.
(c) Rights as a Stockholder. Subject to
the terms and conditions of the Plan and subject to any
restrictions that may be imposed in the Award Agreement, each
Participant receiving Restricted Stock Units shall have no
rights as a stockholder with respect to such Restricted Stock
Units until such time as Shares are issued to the Participant.
SECTION 10
(a) Other Stock-Based Awards. The
Committee is hereby authorized to grant to Eligible Individuals
an Other Stock-Based Award, which shall consist of
an Award that is not an instrument or Award specified in
Sections 6 through 9 of this Plan, the value of which is
based in whole or in part on the value of Shares. Other
Stock-Based Awards may be awards of Shares or may be denominated
or payable in, valued in whole or in part by reference to, or
otherwise based on or related to, Shares (including, without
limitation, securities convertible or exchangeable into or
exercisable for Shares), as deemed by the Committee consistent
with the
A-7
purposes of the Plan. The Committee shall determine the terms
and conditions of any such Other Stock-Based Award and may
provide that such awards would be payable in whole or in part in
cash. To the extent that an Other Stock-Based Award is intended
to qualify as performance-based compensation under
Section 162(m), it must be made subject to the attainment
of one or more of the performance goals specified in
Section 5(c) hereof and meet the additional requirements
imposed by Section 162(m).
(b) The Vesting Period. Except
(i) for Other Stock-Based Awards that vest based on the
attainment of performance goals, and (ii) as provided in
Section 5(a)(i)(C)(2), a vesting period of at least three
years is required with incremental vesting of the Award over the
three-year period permitted. If the grant or vesting is subject
to the attainment of specified performance goals, a vesting
period of at least one year with incremental vesting is
permitted. The expiration of the vesting period shall also occur
as provided in the Award Agreement in accordance with
Section 12(a) hereof.
(c) Dividend Equivalents. In the sole and
complete discretion of the Committee, an Award, whether made as
an Other Stock-Based Award under this Section 10 or as an
Award granted pursuant to Sections 8 and 9 hereof, may
provide the holder thereof with dividends or dividend
equivalents, payable in cash, Shares, Subsidiary securities,
other securities or other property on a current or deferred
basis.
SECTION 11
(a) Amendment or Discontinuance of the
Plan. The Board may amend or discontinue the Plan
at any time; provided, however, that no such amendment may
(i) without the approval of the stockholders,
(A) increase, subject to adjustments permitted herein, the
maximum number of shares of Common Stock that may be issued
through the Plan, (B) materially increase the benefits
accruing to Participants under the Plan, (C) materially
expand the classes of persons eligible to participate in the
Plan, (D) expand the types of Awards available for grant
under the Plan, (E) materially extend the term of the Plan,
(F) materially change the method of determining the
exercise price of Options or Stock Appreciation Rights, or
(G) amend Section 11(c) to permit a reduction in the
exercise price of Options; or
(ii) materially impair, without the consent of the
recipient, an Award previously granted.
(b) Adjustment of Awards Upon the Occurrence of Certain
Unusual or Nonrecurring Events. The Committee is
hereby authorized to make adjustments in the terms and
conditions of, and the criteria included in, Awards in
recognition of unusual or nonrecurring events (including,
without limitation, the events described in Section 5(b)
hereof) affecting the Company, or the financial statements of
the Company or any Subsidiary, or of changes in applicable laws,
regulations, or accounting principles, whenever the Committee
determines that such adjustments are appropriate to prevent
dilution or enlargement of the benefits or potential benefits
intended to be made available under the Plan.
(c) Cancellation. Any provision of this
Plan or any Award Agreement to the contrary notwithstanding, the
Committee may cause any Award granted hereunder to be canceled
in consideration of a cash payment or alternative Award made to
the holder of such canceled Award equal in value to such
canceled Award. Notwithstanding the foregoing, except for
adjustments permitted under Sections 5(b) and 11(b), no
action by the Committee shall, unless approved by the
stockholders of the Company, (i) cause a reduction in the
exercise price of Options granted under the Plan or
(ii) permit an outstanding Option with an exercise price
greater than the current fair market value of a Share to be
surrendered as consideration for a new Option with a lower
exercise price, shares of Restricted Stock, Restricted Stock
Units, and Other Stock-Based Award, a cash payment, or Common
Stock. The determinations of value under this subparagraph shall
be made by the Committee in its sole discretion.
SECTION 12
(a) Award Agreements. Each Award
hereunder shall be evidenced by an agreement or notice delivered
to the Participant (by paper copy or electronically) that shall
specify the terms and conditions thereof
A-8
and any rules applicable thereto, including but not limited to
the effect on such Award of the death, retirement or other
termination of employment or cessation of consulting or advisory
services of the Participant and the effect thereon, if any, of a
change of control of the Company.
(b) Withholding.
(i) A Participant shall be required to pay to the Company,
and the Company shall have the right to deduct from all amounts
paid to a Participant (whether under the Plan or otherwise), any
taxes required by law to be paid or withheld in respect of
Awards hereunder to such Participant. The Committee may provide
for additional cash payments to holders of Awards to defray or
offset any tax arising from the grant, vesting, exercise or
payment of any Award.
(i) At any time that a Participant is required to pay to
the Company an amount required to be withheld under the
applicable tax laws in connection with the issuance of Shares
under the Plan, the Participant may, if permitted by the
Committee, satisfy this obligation in whole or in part by
delivering currently owned Shares or by electing (the
Election) to have the Company withhold from the
issuance Shares, which Shares shall have a value equal to the
minimum amount required to be withheld. The value of the Shares
delivered or withheld shall be based on the fair market value of
the Shares on the date as of which the amount of tax to be
withheld shall be determined in accordance with applicable tax
laws (the Tax Date).
(ii) Each Election to have Shares withheld must be made
prior to the Tax Date. If a Participant wishes to deliver Shares
in payment of taxes, the Participant must so notify the Company
prior to the Tax Date.
(c) Transferability.
(i) No Awards granted hereunder may be sold, transferred,
pledged, assigned, or otherwise encumbered by a Participant
except:
(A) by will;
(B) by the laws of descent and distribution;
(C) pursuant to a domestic relations order, as defined in
the Code, if permitted by the Committee and so provided in the
Award Agreement or an amendment thereto; or
(D) if permitted by the Committee and so provided in the
Award Agreement or an amendment thereto, Options may be
transferred or assigned (1) to Immediate Family Members,
(2) to a partnership in which Immediate Family Members, or
entities in which Immediate Family Members are the owners,
members or beneficiaries, as appropriate, are the partners,
(3) to a limited liability company in which Immediate
Family Members, or entities in which Immediate Family Members
are the owners, members or beneficiaries, as appropriate, are
the members, or (4) to a trust for the benefit of Immediate
Family Members; provided, however, that no more than a de
minimis beneficial interest in a partnership, limited
liability company, or trust described in (2), (3) or
(4) above may be owned by a person who is not an Immediate
Family Member or by an entity that is not beneficially owned
solely by Immediate Family Members.
(ii) To the extent that an Incentive Stock Option is
permitted to be transferred during the lifetime of the
Participant, it shall be treated thereafter as a Nonqualified
Stock Option. Any attempted assignment, transfer, pledge,
hypothecation, or other disposition of Awards, or levy of
attachment or similar process upon Awards not specifically
permitted herein, shall be null and void and without effect. The
designation of a Designated Beneficiary shall not be a violation
of this Section 12(c).
(d) Share Certificates. Any certificates
or book or electronic entry ownership evidence for Shares or
other securities delivered under the Plan pursuant to any Award
or the exercise thereof shall be subject to such stop transfer
orders and other restrictions as the Committee may deem
advisable under the Plan or the rules, regulations, and other
requirements of the Securities and Exchange Commission, any
stock exchange upon which such Shares or other securities are
then listed, and any applicable federal or state laws, and the
Committee may cause a legend or legends to be put on any such
certificates to make appropriate reference to such restrictions.
A-9
(e) No Limit on Other Compensation
Arrangements. Nothing contained in the Plan shall
prevent the Company from adopting or continuing in effect other
compensation arrangements, which may, but need not, provide for
the grant of options, stock appreciation rights, restricted
stock, and other types of Awards provided for hereunder (subject
to stockholder approval of any such arrangement if approval is
required), and such arrangements may be either generally
applicable or applicable only in specific cases.
(f) No Right to Employment. The grant of
an Award shall not be construed as giving a Participant the
right to be retained in the employ of or as a consultant or
adviser to the Company or any Subsidiary or in the employ of or
as a consultant or adviser to any other entity providing
services to the Company. The Company or any Subsidiary or any
such entity may at any time dismiss a Participant from
employment, or terminate any arrangement pursuant to which the
Participant provides services to the Company or a Subsidiary,
free from any liability or any claim under the Plan, unless
otherwise expressly provided in the Plan or in any Award
Agreement. No Eligible Individual or other person shall have any
claim to be granted any Award, and there is no obligation for
uniformity of treatment of Eligible Individuals, Participants or
holders or beneficiaries of Awards.
(g) Governing Law. The validity,
construction, and effect of the Plan, any rules and regulations
relating to the Plan and any Award Agreement shall be determined
in accordance with the laws of the State of Delaware.
(h) Severability. If any provision of the
Plan or any Award is or becomes or is deemed to be invalid,
illegal, or unenforceable in any jurisdiction or as to any
Person or Award, or would disqualify the Plan or any Award under
any law deemed applicable by the Committee, such provision shall
be construed or deemed amended to conform to applicable laws, or
if it cannot be construed or deemed amended without, in the
determination of the Committee, materially altering the intent
of the Plan or the Award, such provision shall be stricken as to
such jurisdiction, Person or Award and the remainder of the Plan
and any such Award shall remain in full force and effect.
(i) No Trust or
Fund Created. Neither the Plan nor any Award
shall create or be construed to create a trust or separate fund
of any kind or a fiduciary relationship between the Company and
a Participant or any other Person. To the extent that any Person
acquires a right to receive payments from the Company pursuant
to an Award, such right shall be no greater than the right of
any unsecured general creditor of the Company.
(j) No Fractional Shares. No fractional
Shares shall be issued or delivered pursuant to the Plan or any
Award, and the Committee shall determine whether cash, other
securities or other property shall be paid or transferred in
lieu of any fractional Shares or whether such fractional Shares
or any rights thereto shall be canceled, terminated, or
otherwise eliminated.
(k) Compliance with Law. The Company
intends that Awards granted under the Plan, or any deferrals
thereof, will comply with the requirements of Section 409A
to the extent applicable.
(l) Deferral Permitted. Payment of cash
or distribution of any Shares to which a Participant is entitled
under any Award shall be made as provided in the Award
Agreement. Payment may be deferred at the option of the
Participant if provided in the Award Agreement.
(m) Headings. Headings are given to the
subsections of the Plan solely as a convenience to facilitate
reference. Such headings shall not be deemed in any way material
or relevant to the construction or interpretation of the Plan or
any provision thereof.
SECTION 13
Term of the Plan. Subject to
Section 11(a), no Awards may be granted under the Plan
after June 9, 2020, which is ten years after the date the
Plan was last approved by the Companys stockholders;
provided, however, that Awards granted prior to such date shall
remain in effect until such Awards have either been satisfied,
expired or canceled under the terms of the Plan, and any
restrictions imposed on Shares in connection with their issuance
under the Plan have lapsed.
A-10
FREEPORT-MCMORAN COPPER & GOLD INC. Proxy Solicited on Behalf of the Board of Directors for
Annual Meeting of Stockholders, June 9, 2010 The undersigned hereby appoints James R. Moffett,
Richard C. Adkerson and Kathleen L. Quirk, each or any of them, as proxies, with full power of
substitution, to vote the shares of the undersigned in Freeport-McMoRan Copper & Gold Inc. at the
Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on Wednesday, June 9, 2010, at 10:00 a.m. Eastern Time,
and at any adjournment thereof, on all matters coming before the meeting. The proxies will vote:
(1) as you specify on the back of this card, (2) as the Board of Directors recommends where you do
not specify your vote on a matter listed on the back of this card, and (3) as the proxies decide on
any other matter. If you wish to vote on all matters as the Board of Directors recommends, please
sign, date and return this card. If you wish to vote on items individually, please also mark the
appropriate boxes on the back of this card. PLEASE MARK, SIGN, DATE AND RETURN THIS PROXY PROMPTLY
IN THE ENCLOSED ENVELOPE (continued on reverse side) 3 FOLD AND DETACH HERE 3
|
Please mark your votes as indicated in this example You may specify your votes by marking the
appropriate boxes on this side. You need not mark any boxes, however, if you wish to vote all items
in accordance with the Board of Directors recommendation. If your votes are not specified, this
proxy will be voted FOR Items 1, 2 and 3 and against Items 4 and 5. Your Board of Directors
recommends a vote FOR Items 1, 2 and 3 below. Your Board of Directors recommends a vote
AGAINST Items 4 and 5 below. 1. Election of twelve directors. Nominees are: FOR 3 WITHHOLD 3
Richard C. Adkerson, Robert J. Allison, Jr., Robert A. Day, Gerald J. Ford, H. Devon Graham, Jr.,
4. Stockholder proposal regarding the selection Charles C. Krulak, Bobby Lee Lackey, Jon C.
Madonna, Dustan E. McCoy, James R. Moffett, B. M. of a candidate with environmental expertise to
Rankin, Jr., Stephen H. Siegele. be recommended for election to the companys FOR, except withhold
vote from following nominee(s): Board of Directors. FOR 3 AGAINST 3 ABSTAIN 3 2. Ratification of
the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP 5. Stockholder proposal regarding the adoption as independent
registered public accounting firm. FOR 3 AGAINST 3 ABSTAIN 3 of a policy requiring senior
executives to retain 3. Adoption of the Amended and Restated 2006 Stock shares acquired through
equity compensation Incentive Plan. FOR 3 AGAINST 3 ABSTAIN 3 programs until two years following
termination of their employment. FOR 3 AGAINST 3 ABSTAIN 3 Signature(s) Date: 2010 3
FOLD AND DETACH HERE 3 FREEPORT-MCMORAN COPPER & GOLD INC. OFFERS STOCKHOLDERS OF RECORD
TWO WAYS TO VOTE YOUR PROXY Your Internet vote authorizes the named proxies to vote your shares in
the same manner as if you had returned your proxy card. We encourage you to use this cost effective
and convenient way of voting, 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. INTERNET VOTING VOTING BY MAIL Visit
the Internet voting website at Simply sign and date your proxy card and return
http://www.ivselection.com/freeport10. Have it in the postage-paid envelope to Secretary, this
proxy card ready and follow the instructions Freeport-McMoRan Copper & Gold Inc., P.O. Box on your
screen. You will incur only your usual 17149, Wilmington, Delaware 19885-9808. If you Internet
charges. Available 24 hours a day, 7 are voting by Internet, please do not mail your days a week
until 11:59 p.m., Eastern Time on proxy card. June 8, 2010. IMPORTANT NOTICE REGARDING THE
AVAILABILITY OF PROXY MATERIALS FOR THE STOCKHOLDER MEETING TO BE HELD ON JUNE 9, 2010. This proxy
statement and the 2009 annual report are available at http://www.edocumentview.com/FCX_MTG |