e10vq
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
|
|
|
þ |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For
the quarterly period ended March 31, 2010
Or
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
Commission File Number 1-5424
DELTA AIR LINES, INC.
State of Incorporation: Delaware
I.R.S. Employer Identification No.: 58-0218548
Post Office Box 20706, Atlanta, Georgia 30320-6001
Telephone: (404) 715-2600
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed
by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or
for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months
(or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
Yes o No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated
filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large
accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer þ
|
|
Accelerated filer o
|
|
Non-accelerated filer o |
|
Smaller reporting company o |
|
|
|
|
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
|
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of
the Exchange Act).
Yes o No þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed all documents and reports required to
be filed by Section 12, 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 subsequent to the
distribution of securities under a plan confirmed by a court.
Yes þ No o
Number
of shares outstanding by each class of common stock, as of March 31,
2010:
Common Stock, $0.0001 par value787,388,868 shares outstanding
This document is also available through our website at http://www.delta.com/about_delta/investor_relations.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Unless otherwise indicated, the terms Delta, we, us, and our refer to Delta Air Lines,
Inc. and its subsidiaries. Prior to October 30, 2008, these references do not include Northwest
Airlines Corporation and its wholly-owned subsidiaries, including Northwest Airlines, Inc.
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
Statements in this Form 10-Q (or otherwise made by us or on our behalf) that are not
historical facts, including statements about our estimates, expectations, beliefs, intentions,
projections or strategies for the future, may be forward-looking statements as defined in the
Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Forward-looking statements involve risks and
uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from historical experience or
our present expectations. For examples of such risks and uncertainties, please see the cautionary
statements contained in Part I, Item 1A. Risk Factors of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
fiscal year ended December 31, 2009 (Form 10-K)
and in Part II, Item 1A. Risk Factors in this Form 10-Q. All forward-looking statements speak only as of
the date made, and we undertake no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking
statements to reflect events or circumstances that may arise after the date of this report.
1
DELTA AIR LINES, INC.
Consolidated Balance Sheets
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
(in millions, except share data) |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
ASSETS
|
Current Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
4,913 |
|
|
$ |
4,607 |
|
Short-term investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
71 |
|
Restricted cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
456 |
|
|
|
423 |
|
Accounts
receivable, net of an allowance for uncollectible accounts of $49 and $47 at March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively |
|
|
1,533 |
|
|
|
1,353 |
|
Expendable
parts and supplies inventories, net of an allowance for obsolescence of $85 and $75 at March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively |
|
|
319 |
|
|
|
327 |
|
Deferred income taxes, net |
|
|
164 |
|
|
|
107 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other |
|
|
976 |
|
|
|
853 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
8,361 |
|
|
|
7,741 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and Equipment, Net: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation and amortization of $3,247 and $2,924 at
March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively |
|
|
20,481 |
|
|
|
20,433 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill |
|
|
9,794 |
|
|
|
9,787 |
|
Identifiable intangibles, net of accumulated amortization of $475 and $451 at March 31, 2010 and
December 31, 2009, respectively |
|
|
4,805 |
|
|
|
4,829 |
|
Other noncurrent assets |
|
|
898 |
|
|
|
749 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other assets |
|
|
15,497 |
|
|
|
15,365 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
44,339 |
|
|
$ |
43,539 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
|
Current Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current maturities of long-term debt and capital leases |
|
$ |
1,665 |
|
|
$ |
1,533 |
|
Air traffic liability |
|
|
3,992 |
|
|
|
3,074 |
|
Frequent flyer deferred revenue |
|
|
1,602 |
|
|
|
1,614 |
|
Accounts payable |
|
|
1,505 |
|
|
|
1,249 |
|
Accrued salaries and related benefits |
|
|
1,010 |
|
|
|
1,037 |
|
Taxes payable |
|
|
705 |
|
|
|
525 |
|
Other accrued liabilities |
|
|
745 |
|
|
|
765 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
11,224 |
|
|
|
9,797 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noncurrent Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt and capital leases |
|
|
15,251 |
|
|
|
15,665 |
|
Pension, postretirement and related benefits |
|
|
11,614 |
|
|
|
11,745 |
|
Frequent flyer deferred revenue |
|
|
3,128 |
|
|
|
3,198 |
|
Deferred income taxes, net |
|
|
1,731 |
|
|
|
1,667 |
|
Other noncurrent liabilities |
|
|
1,319 |
|
|
|
1,222 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total noncurrent liabilities |
|
|
33,043 |
|
|
|
33,497 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and Contingencies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders Equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock at $0.0001 par value; 1,500,000,000 shares authorized, 798,952,757 and 794,873,058
shares issued at March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
13,856 |
|
|
|
13,827 |
|
Accumulated deficit |
|
|
(10,101 |
) |
|
|
(9,845 |
) |
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
|
|
(3,502 |
) |
|
|
(3,563 |
) |
Treasury stock, at cost, 11,563,889 and 10,918,274 shares at March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009,
respectively |
|
|
(181 |
) |
|
|
(174 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
72 |
|
|
|
245 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
|
$ |
44,339 |
|
|
$ |
43,539 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
2
DELTA AIR LINES, INC.
Consolidated Statements of Operations
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, |
(in millions, except per share data) |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
Operating Revenue: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Passenger: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mainline |
|
$ |
4,486 |
|
|
$ |
4,367 |
|
Regional carriers |
|
|
1,320 |
|
|
|
1,234 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total passenger revenue |
|
|
5,806 |
|
|
|
5,601 |
|
Cargo |
|
|
176 |
|
|
|
185 |
|
Other, net |
|
|
866 |
|
|
|
898 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating revenue |
|
|
6,848 |
|
|
|
6,684 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Expense: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aircraft fuel and related taxes |
|
|
1,683 |
|
|
|
1,893 |
|
Salaries and related costs |
|
|
1,672 |
|
|
|
1,706 |
|
Contract carrier arrangements |
|
|
917 |
|
|
|
908 |
|
Contracted services |
|
|
392 |
|
|
|
432 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
385 |
|
|
|
384 |
|
Aircraft maintenance materials and outside repairs |
|
|
374 |
|
|
|
424 |
|
Passenger commissions and other selling expenses |
|
|
364 |
|
|
|
356 |
|
Landing fees and other rents |
|
|
313 |
|
|
|
316 |
|
Passenger service |
|
|
138 |
|
|
|
135 |
|
Aircraft rent |
|
|
112 |
|
|
|
121 |
|
Restructuring and merger-related items |
|
|
54 |
|
|
|
99 |
|
Other |
|
|
376 |
|
|
|
393 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expense |
|
|
6,780 |
|
|
|
7,167 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Income (Loss) |
|
|
68 |
|
|
|
(483 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other (Expense) Income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense |
|
|
(326 |
) |
|
|
(308 |
) |
Interest income |
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
Miscellaneous, net |
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
(13 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other expense, net |
|
|
(314 |
) |
|
|
(311 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss Before Income Taxes |
|
|
(246 |
) |
|
|
(794 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income Tax Provision |
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Loss |
|
$ |
(256 |
) |
|
$ |
(794 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and Diluted Loss per Share |
|
$ |
(0.31 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.96 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
3
DELTA AIR LINES, INC.
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flow
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, |
(in millions) |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
$ |
966 |
|
|
$ |
643 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flows From Investing Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and equipment additions: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Flight equipment, including advance payments |
|
|
(286 |
) |
|
|
(386 |
) |
Ground property and equipment, including technology |
|
|
(42 |
) |
|
|
(49 |
) |
(Increase) decrease in restricted cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
(26 |
) |
|
|
18 |
|
Redemption of short-term investments |
|
|
73 |
|
|
|
72 |
|
Proceeds from sales of flight equipment |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
74 |
|
Other, net |
|
|
(17 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
|
(293 |
) |
|
|
(272 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flows From Financing Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments on long-term debt and capital lease obligations |
|
|
(368 |
) |
|
|
(538 |
) |
Proceeds from long-term obligations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
356 |
|
Other, net |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in financing activities |
|
|
(367 |
) |
|
|
(185 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Increase in Cash and Cash Equivalents |
|
|
306 |
|
|
|
186 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
|
|
4,607 |
|
|
|
4,255 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
|
$ |
4,913 |
|
|
$ |
4,441 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-cash transactions: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aircraft delivered under seller financing |
|
$ |
21 |
|
|
$ |
132 |
|
Flight equipment |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
69 |
|
Flight equipment under capital leases |
|
|
120 |
|
|
|
|
|
Debt discount on American Express Agreement |
|
|
110 |
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
4
DELTA AIR LINES, INC.
Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
March 31, 2010
(Unaudited)
NOTE 1. BACKGROUND AND BASIS OF PRESENTATION
Background
On October 29, 2008 (the Closing Date), a wholly-owned subsidiary of Delta merged (the
Merger) with and into Northwest Airlines Corporation. On the Closing Date, Northwest Airlines
Corporation and its wholly-owned subsidiaries, including Northwest Airlines, Inc. (collectively,
Northwest), became wholly-owned subsidiaries of Delta.
On December 31, 2009, Northwest Airlines, Inc. merged with and into Delta. As a result of this
merger, Northwest Airlines, Inc. ceased to exist as a separate entity.
Basis of Presentation
The accompanying unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements have been prepared in
accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (GAAP) for interim
financial information. Consistent with these requirements, this Form 10-Q does not include all the
information required by GAAP for complete financial statements. As a result, this Form 10-Q should
be read in conjunction with the Consolidated Financial Statements and accompanying Notes in our
Form 10-K.
Our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements include the accounts of Delta Air Lines, Inc.
and our wholly-owned subsidiaries.
Management believes the accompanying unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
reflect all adjustments, including normal recurring items and restructuring and merger-related
items, considered necessary for a fair statement of results for the interim periods presented.
Due to seasonal variations in the demand for air travel, the volatility of aircraft fuel
prices, changes in global economic conditions and other factors, operating results for the three
months ended March 31, 2010 are not necessarily indicative of operating results for the entire
year.
Based upon adjustments recorded at December 31, 2009, certain immaterial prior period amounts
have been reclassified to conform to our current period presentation. The adjustments to the
Consolidated Statements of Operations do not impact total operating expense or net income.
We reclassified travel and incidental expenses, primarily crew meals and lodging expenses,
from salaries and related costs to other operating expense. These expenses total $117 million for
the three months ended March 31, 2009. We also adjusted our Consolidated Statements of Operations
for certain costs incurred to provide services to our contract carriers, excluding Comair, Inc.
(Comair), Compass Airlines, Inc. (Compass) and Mesaba Aviation, Inc. (Mesaba); these costs
are recorded as a reduction to salaries and related costs and contracted services, as appropriate,
rather than as a reduction to other operating expense. These costs total $70 million for the three
months ended March 31, 2009.
We evaluated the financial statements for subsequent events through the date of the filing of
this Form 10-Q, which is the date the financial statements were issued.
5
Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements
In September 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Revenue Arrangements with
Multiple Deliverables. The standard revises guidance on (1) the determination of when individual
deliverables may be treated as separate units of accounting and (2) the allocation of transaction
consideration among separately identified deliverables. It also expands disclosure requirements
regarding an entitys multiple element revenue arrangements. The standard is effective for fiscal
years beginning on or after June 15, 2010, with early adoption permitted. We are currently
evaluating the impact that the adoption of this standard will have on our Consolidated Financial
Statements.
NOTE 2. FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
Fair value is defined as an exit price, representing the amount that would be received to sell
an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants.
Fair value is a market-based measurement that is determined based on assumptions that market
participants would use in pricing an asset or liability. A three-tier fair value hierarchy is used
to prioritize the inputs in measuring fair value as follows:
|
|
|
Level 1. Observable inputs such as quoted prices in active markets; |
|
|
|
|
Level 2. Inputs, other than quoted prices in active markets, that are observable either
directly or indirectly; and |
|
|
|
|
Level 3. Unobservable inputs in which there is little or no market data, which require
the reporting entity to develop its own assumptions. |
Assets and liabilities measured at fair value are based on one or more of three valuation
techniques identified in the tables below. Where more than one technique is noted, individual
assets or liabilities were valued using one or more of the noted techniques. The valuation
techniques are as follows:
|
(a) |
|
Market approach. Prices and other relevant information generated by market transactions
involving identical or comparable assets or liabilities; |
|
|
(b) |
|
Cost approach. Amount that would be required to replace the service capacity of an asset
(replacement cost); and |
|
|
(c) |
|
Income approach. Techniques to convert future amounts to a single present amount based on
market expectations (including present value techniques, option-pricing and excess earnings
models). |
Assets
and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Significant |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted Prices |
|
Other |
|
Significant |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In Active |
|
Observable |
|
Unobservable |
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
Markets |
|
Inputs |
|
Inputs |
|
Valuation |
(in millions) |
|
2010 |
|
(Level 1) |
|
(Level 2) |
|
(Level 3) |
|
Technique |
|
Cash equivalents |
|
$ |
4,629 |
|
|
$ |
4,629 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
(a) |
Restricted cash equivalents |
|
|
468 |
|
|
|
468 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
Long-term investments |
|
|
129 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
129 |
|
|
(c) |
Hedge derivatives |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aircraft
fuel derivatives |
|
$ |
395 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
395 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
(a)(c) |
Interest
rate derivatives |
|
|
(55 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(55 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
(a)(c) |
Foreign
currency derivatives |
|
|
(21 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(21 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hedge derivatives asset, net |
|
$ |
319 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
319 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Significant |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted Prices |
|
Other |
|
Significant |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In Active |
|
Observable |
|
Unobservable |
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
Markets |
|
Inputs |
|
Inputs |
|
Valuation |
(in millions) |
|
2009 |
|
(Level 1) |
|
(Level 2) |
|
(Level 3) |
|
Technique |
|
Cash equivalents |
|
$ |
4,335 |
|
|
$ |
4,335 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
(a) |
Short-term investments |
|
|
71 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
71 |
|
|
(c) |
Restricted cash equivalents |
|
|
435 |
|
|
|
435 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
Long-term investments |
|
|
129 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
129 |
|
|
(c) |
Hedge derivatives |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aircraft fuel
derivatives |
|
$ |
176 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
176 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
(a)(c) |
Interest
rate derivatives |
|
|
(45 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(45 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
(a)(c) |
Foreign
currency derivatives |
|
|
(23 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(23 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hedge derivatives asset, net |
|
$ |
108 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
108 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6
Cash Equivalents. Short-term, highly liquid investments with
maturities of three months or less when purchased, which primarily
consist of money market funds and treasury bills, are classified as cash equivalents. These investments are
recorded in cash and cash equivalents on our Consolidated Balance
Sheets at cost, which approximates fair value.
Restricted Cash Equivalents. Restricted short-term, highly liquid investments with maturities
of three months or less when purchased, which primarily consist of money market funds and time
deposits, are classified as restricted cash equivalents. At March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009,
we recorded $452 million and $419 million, respectively, in
restricted cash and cash equivalents and $16 million in other
noncurrent assets on
our Consolidated Balance Sheets. These investments are recorded at cost, which approximates fair value.
Short-Term Investments. During the March 2010 quarter, we received $73 million from The
Reserve Primary Fund (the Primary Fund), $71 million
of which was recorded in short-term
investments on our Consolidated Balance Sheet at December 31, 2009. The Primary Fund is a money market fund that is undergoing an
orderly liquidation. We recorded this investment as an available-for-sale security at fair value.
Combined with previous distributions from the Primary Fund, we have now received 99% of our
original investment.
Long-Term Investments. Our long-term investments are comprised of student loan backed auction
rate securities and insured auction rate securities. We record our investments in student loan
backed auction rate securities as available-for-sale securities at fair
value. At March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, the fair value and cost of our student loan
backed auction rate securities was $44 million and
$45 million, respectively.
We record our investments in insured auction rate securities as trading securities at fair
value. At March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, the fair value of our insured auction rate
securities was $83 million. The cost of these investments was $110 million.
Due to the protracted failure in the auction process and contractual maturities averaging 31
years for our student loan backed auction rate securities and 26 years for our insured auction rate
securities, we have classified our auction rate securities as long-term in other noncurrent assets
on our Consolidated Balance Sheets.
Because auction rate securities are not actively traded, fair values were estimated by
discounting the cash flows expected to be received over the remaining maturities of the underlying
securities. We based the valuations on our assessment of observable yields on instruments bearing
comparable risks and consider the creditworthiness of the underlying debt issuer. Changes in market
conditions could result in further adjustments to the fair value of these securities.
Hedge Derivatives. Our results of operations are significantly impacted by changes in aircraft
fuel prices, interest rates and foreign currency exchange rates. In an effort to manage our
exposure to these risks, we periodically enter into derivative instruments, including fuel,
interest rate and foreign currency hedges. These derivative instruments are comprised of contracts
that are privately negotiated with counterparties without going through a public exchange.
Accordingly, our fair value assessments give consideration to the risk of counterparty default (as
well as our own credit risk).
|
|
|
Aircraft Fuel Derivatives. Our aircraft fuel derivative instruments generally consist of
crude oil, heating oil and jet fuel swap, collar, and call option contracts and are valued
under the income approach using a discounted cash flow model or an option pricing model
based on data either readily observable or derived from public markets. |
|
|
|
|
Interest Rate Derivatives. Our interest rate derivative instruments consist of swap and
call option contracts and are valued primarily based on data readily observable in public
markets. |
|
|
|
|
Foreign Currency Derivatives. Our foreign currency derivative instruments
consist of Japanese yen and Canadian dollar forward contracts and are valued
based on data readily observable in public markets. |
Our fair value assessments include open derivative positions and exclude contracts that have
been closed, but not settled. For additional information regarding the classification of our
derivative instruments on our Consolidated Balance Sheets, see Note 3.
Fair Value of Debt
Market risk associated with our fixed and variable rate long-term debt relates to the
potential reduction in fair value and negative impact to future earnings, respectively, from an
increase in interest rates. The following table presents information about our debt:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
December 31, |
(in millions) |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
Total debt at par value |
|
$ |
17,735 |
|
|
$ |
18,068 |
|
Unamortized discount, net |
|
|
(1,450 |
) |
|
|
(1,403 |
) |
|
Net carrying amount |
|
$ |
16,285 |
|
|
$ |
16,665 |
|
|
Fair value(1) |
|
$ |
15,683 |
|
|
$ |
15,427 |
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The aggregate fair value of debt was based primarily on reported market
values and recently completed market transactions. |
7
NOTE 3. RISK MANAGEMENT AND FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
Our results of operations are significantly impacted by changes in aircraft fuel prices,
interest rates and foreign currency exchange rates. In an effort to manage our exposure to these
risks, we periodically enter into derivative instruments, including fuel, interest rate and foreign
currency hedges.
We perform, at least quarterly, both a prospective and retrospective assessment of the
effectiveness of our derivative instruments designated as hedges, including assessing the
possibility of counterparty default. If we determine that a derivative is no longer expected to be
highly effective, we discontinue hedge accounting prospectively and recognize subsequent changes in
the fair value of the hedge in earnings. As a result of our effectiveness assessment at March 31,
2010, we believe our derivative instruments designated as hedges will continue to be highly
effective in offsetting changes in cash flow attributable to the hedged risk.
Hedge Position
The following tables reflect the estimated fair value asset (liability) position of our hedge
contracts:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prepaid |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenses |
|
Other |
|
Other |
|
Other |
|
Hedge |
|
|
Notional |
|
Maturity |
|
and Other |
|
Noncurrent |
|
Accrued |
|
Noncurrent |
|
Margin |
(in millions, unless otherwise stated) |
|
Balance |
|
Date |
|
Assets |
|
Assets |
|
Liabilities |
|
Liabilities |
|
Payable, net |
|
|
Designated as
hedges |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fuel hedge
swaps, collars and call options |
|
1.7 billion gallons - crude oil,
jet fuel |
|
April 2010 - September 2011 |
|
$ |
311 |
|
|
$ |
85 |
|
|
$ |
(89 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
rate swaps and call options |
|
$ |
1,433 |
|
|
September 2010 - May 2019 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
(37 |
) |
|
|
(19 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign
currency exchange forwards |
|
49.3 billion Japanese Yen; 332
million Canadian Dollars |
|
April 2010 - October 2012 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
(14 |
) |
|
|
(9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total derivative
instruments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
311 |
|
|
$ |
88 |
|
|
$ |
(140 |
) |
|
$ |
(28 |
) |
|
$ |
(60 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
Other |
|
Hedge |
|
|
Notional |
|
Maturity |
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued |
|
Noncurrent |
|
Margin |
(in millions, unless otherwise stated) |
|
Balance |
|
Date |
|
Assets |
|
Liabilities |
|
Liabilities |
|
Payable, net |
|
|
Designated as
hedges |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fuel hedge
swaps, collars and call options |
|
795 million gallons - crude oil,
heating oil, jet fuel |
|
January 2010 - December 2010 |
|
$ |
180 |
|
|
$ |
(89 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
rate swaps and call options |
|
$ |
1,478 |
|
|
September 2010 - May 2019 |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
(38 |
) |
|
|
(9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign
currency exchange forwards |
|
55.8 billion Japanese Yen; 295
million Canadian Dollars |
|
January 2010 - September 2012 |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
(12 |
) |
|
|
(12 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total derivative
instruments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
183 |
|
|
$ |
(139 |
) |
|
$ |
(21 |
) |
|
$ |
(10 |
) |
|
8
As of March 31, 2010, our open fuel hedge position is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage of |
|
|
|
|
Projected |
|
|
|
|
Fuel |
|
Fair Value at |
|
|
Requirements |
|
March 31, |
(in millions, unless otherwise stated) |
|
Hedged |
|
2010 |
|
Nine months ending December 31, 2010 |
|
|
42 |
% |
|
$ |
265 |
|
Year ending December 31, 2011 |
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
130 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
395 |
|
|
Hedge Gains (Losses)
Gains (losses) recorded on our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements related to our
hedge contracts are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effective Portion Recognized |
|
Effective Portion Reclassified |
|
|
|
|
in Accumulated Other |
|
from Accumulated Other |
|
Ineffective Portion Recognized |
|
|
Comprehensive Loss |
|
Comprehensive Loss to Earnings |
|
in Other (Expense) Income |
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
March 31, |
|
March 31, |
|
March 31, |
(in millions) |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
Designated as hedges |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fuel hedge swaps,
collars and call
options(1) |
|
$ |
59 |
|
|
$ |
346 |
|
|
$ |
(12 |
) |
|
$ |
(663 |
) |
|
$ |
9 |
|
|
$ |
(9 |
) |
Interest rate swaps
and call
options(2) |
|
|
(11 |
) |
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency
exchange forwards and
collars(3) |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
55 |
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total designated |
|
$ |
50 |
|
|
$ |
413 |
|
|
$ |
(17 |
) |
|
$ |
(659 |
) |
|
$ |
9 |
|
|
$ |
(9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Gains and (losses) on fuel hedge contracts reclassified from accumulated other
comprehensive loss are recorded in aircraft fuel and related taxes. |
|
(2) |
|
Gains and (losses) on interest rate swaps and call options reclassified from accumulated other
comprehensive loss are recorded in interest expense. |
|
(3) |
|
Gains and (losses) on foreign currency exchange contracts reclassified from accumulated other
comprehensive loss are recorded in passenger and cargo revenue. |
We recorded a loss of $23 million in aircraft fuel and related taxes on our Consolidated
Statement of Operations for the three months ended March 31, 2009 related to Northwest derivative
contracts that were not designated as hedges. As of March 31, 2010, we recorded in accumulated
other comprehensive loss on our Consolidated Balance Sheet $67 million of net gains on our hedge
contracts scheduled to settle in the next 12 months.
Credit Risk
To manage credit risk associated with our aircraft fuel price, interest rate and foreign
currency hedging programs, we select counterparties based on their credit ratings and limit our
exposure to any one counterparty. We also monitor the market position of these programs and our
relative market position with each counterparty.
Due to the estimated fair value position of our fuel hedge contracts, we received $62 million
in fuel hedge margin from counterparties and provided $2 million in interest rate hedge margin to
counterparties as of March 31, 2010.
9
NOTE 4. DEBT
American Express Agreement. In March 2010, we and American Express modified our December 2008
agreement under which we received $1.0 billion from American Express for their advance purchase of
SkyMiles. This advance payment is classified as long-term debt on our Consolidated Balance Sheets.
It will be satisfied by American Express use of SkyMiles over a specified period (SkyMiles Usage
Period) rather than by cash payments from us. The March 2010 modification provides, among other
things, that we will enhance card member benefits through June 2013 for certain American Express
card members in exchange for (1) a change in the SkyMiles Usage Period to a three-year period
beginning in December 2011 from a two-year period beginning in December 2010 and (2) giving
American Express the option to extend the agreement for one year. These changes deferred $31
million and $480 million of debt maturities for the nine months ending December 31, 2010 and year
ending December 31, 2011, respectively.
Covenants
We were in compliance with all covenants in our financing agreements at March 31, 2010.
Future Maturities
The following table summarizes scheduled maturities of our debt, including current maturities,
at March 31, 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ending December 31, |
|
|
(in millions) |
|
Total |
|
Nine months ending December 31, 2010 |
|
$ |
1,325 |
|
2011 |
|
|
2,096 |
|
2012 |
|
|
3,307 |
|
2013 |
|
|
1,719 |
|
2014 |
|
|
3,181 |
|
Thereafter |
|
|
6,107 |
|
|
|
|
|
17,735 |
|
Unamortized discount, net |
|
|
(1,450 |
) |
|
Total |
|
$ |
16,285 |
|
|
NOTE 5. PURCHASE COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
Aircraft Commitments
Future aircraft purchase commitments at March 31, 2010 are estimated to total approximately
$600 million through December 31, 2010. Approximately $500 million of the $600 million is
associated with the purchase of 13 B-737-800 aircraft for which we have entered into definitive
agreements to sell to third parties immediately following delivery of those aircraft to us by the
manufacturer. We have not received any notice that these parties have defaulted on their purchase
obligations. The remaining commitments relate to the purchase of two B-737-800 aircraft and seven
previously owned MD-90 aircraft. We have no aircraft purchase commitments after December 31, 2010.
As
of March 31, 2010, we have commitments from third parties to
finance or, with respect to the 13 B-737-800 aircraft referred to above, definitive agreements to sell, all aircraft subject
to purchase commitments, except for seven previously owned MD-90 aircraft. Under these financing
commitments, third parties have agreed to finance on a long-term basis a substantial portion of the
purchase price of the covered aircraft.
Our aircraft purchase commitments described above do not include our orders for:
|
|
|
18 B-787-8 aircraft. The Boeing Company (Boeing) has informed us that Boeing will be
unable to meet the contractual delivery schedule for these aircraft. We are in discussions
with Boeing regarding this situation. |
|
|
|
|
five A319-100 aircraft and two A320-200 aircraft. We have the right to cancel these
orders. |
10
Contract Carrier Agreements
During the March 2010 quarter, we had contract carrier agreements with 10 contract carriers,
including our wholly-owned subsidiaries, Comair, Compass and Mesaba. For additional information
about our contract carrier agreements, see Note 8 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial
Statements in our Form 10-K.
Contingencies Related to Termination of Contract Carrier Agreements
We may terminate the Chautauqua and Shuttle America contract carrier agreements without cause
at any time after May 2010 and January 2016, respectively, by providing certain advance notice. If
we terminate either the Chautauqua or Shuttle America agreements without cause, Chautauqua or
Shuttle America, respectively, has the right to (1) assign to us leased aircraft that the airline
operates for us, provided we are able to continue the leases on the same terms the airline had
prior to the assignment and (2) require us to purchase or lease any of the aircraft that the
airline owns and operates for us at the time of the termination. If we are required to purchase
aircraft owned by Chautauqua or Shuttle America, the purchase price would be equal to the amount
necessary to (1) reimburse Chautauqua or Shuttle America for the equity it provided to purchase the
aircraft and (2) repay in full any debt outstanding at such time that is not being assumed in
connection with such purchase. If we are required to lease aircraft owned by Chautauqua or Shuttle
America, the lease would have (1) a rate equal to the debt payments of Chautauqua or Shuttle
America for the debt financing of the aircraft calculated as if 90% of the aircraft was debt
financed by Chautauqua or Shuttle America and (2) other specified terms and conditions.
We estimate that the total fair values, determined as of March 31, 2010, of the aircraft that
Chautauqua or Shuttle America could assign to us or require that we purchase if we terminate
without cause our contract carrier agreements with those airlines (the Put Right) are
approximately $200 million and $440 million, respectively. The actual amount that we may be
required to pay in these circumstances may be materially different from these estimates. If the
Chautauqua or Shuttle America Put Right is exercised, we must also pay the exercising carrier 10%
interest (compounded monthly) on the equity the carrier provided when it purchased the put
aircraft. These equity amounts for Chautauqua and Shuttle America total $25 million and $52
million, respectively.
Legal Contingencies
We are involved in various legal proceedings related to employment practices, environmental
issues, bankruptcy matters, antitrust matters and other matters concerning our business. We cannot
reasonably estimate the potential loss for certain legal proceedings because, for example, the
litigation is in its early stages or the plaintiff does not specify the damages being sought.
Credit Card Processing Agreements
Visa/MasterCard Processing Agreement
Our Visa/MasterCard credit card processing agreement provides that no cash reserve (Reserve)
is required except in certain circumstances, including when we do not maintain a required level of
unrestricted cash. In circumstances in which the processor can establish a Reserve, the amount of
the Reserve would be equal to the potential liability of the credit card processor for tickets
purchased with Visa or MasterCard that had not yet been used for travel. There was no Reserve as of
March 31, 2010 or December 31, 2009.
American Express
Our American Express credit card processing agreement provides that no withholding of payment
related to receivables collected will occur except in certain circumstances, including when we do
not maintain a required level of unrestricted cash. In circumstances in which American Express is
permitted to withhold payment related to receivables collected, the amount that can be withheld is
an amount up to American Express potential liability for tickets purchased with the American
Express credit card that had not yet been used for travel. No amounts were withheld as of March 31,
2010 or December 31, 2009.
11
Other Contingencies
General Indemnifications
We are the lessee under many commercial real estate leases. It is common in these transactions
for us, as the lessee, to agree to indemnify the lessor and the lessors related parties for tort,
environmental and other liabilities that arise out of or relate to our use or occupancy of the
leased premises. This type of indemnity would typically make us responsible to indemnified parties
for liabilities arising out of the conduct of, among others, contractors, licensees and invitees
at, or in connection with, the use or occupancy of the leased premises. This indemnity often
extends to related liabilities arising from the negligence of the indemnified parties, but usually
excludes any liabilities caused by either their sole or gross negligence and their willful
misconduct.
Our aircraft and other equipment lease and financing agreements typically contain provisions
requiring us, as the lessee or obligor, to indemnify the other parties to those agreements,
including certain of those parties related persons, against virtually any liabilities that might
arise from the condition, use or operation of the aircraft or such other equipment.
We believe that our insurance would cover most of our exposure to such liabilities and related
indemnities associated with the types of lease and financing agreements described above, including
real estate leases. However, our insurance does not typically cover environmental liabilities,
although we have certain policies in place to meet the requirements of applicable environmental
laws.
Certain of our aircraft and other financing transactions include provisions which require us
to make payments to preserve an expected economic return to the lenders if that economic return is
diminished due to certain changes in law or regulations. In certain of these financing
transactions, we also bear the risk of certain changes in tax laws that would subject payments to
non-U.S. lenders to withholding taxes.
We cannot reasonably estimate our potential future payments under the indemnities and related
provisions described above because we cannot predict (1) when and under what circumstances these
provisions may be triggered and (2) the amount that would be payable if the provisions were
triggered because the amounts would be based on facts and circumstances existing at such time.
Employees Under Collective Bargaining Agreements
At March 31, 2010, we had 81,096 full-time equivalent employees. Approximately 38% of these
employees were represented by unions.
War-Risk Insurance Contingency
As a result of the terrorist attacks on September 11, 2001, aviation insurers significantly
reduced the maximum amount of insurance coverage available to commercial air carriers for liability
to persons (other than employees or passengers) for claims resulting from acts of terrorism, war or
similar events. At the same time, aviation insurers significantly increased the premiums for such
coverage and for aviation insurance in general. Since September 24, 2001, the U.S. government has
been providing U.S. airlines with war-risk insurance to cover losses, including those resulting
from terrorism, to passengers, third parties (ground damage) and the aircraft hull. The U.S.
Secretary of Transportation has extended coverage through August 31, 2010, and we expect the
coverage to be further extended. The withdrawal of government support of airline war-risk insurance
would require us to obtain war-risk insurance coverage commercially, if available. Such commercial
insurance could have substantially less desirable coverage than currently provided by the U.S.
government, may not be adequate to protect our risk of loss from future acts of terrorism, may
result in a material increase to our operating expense or may not be obtainable at all, resulting
in an interruption to our operations.
Other
We have certain contracts for goods and services that require us to pay a penalty, acquire
inventory specific to us or purchase contract specific equipment, as defined by each respective
contract, if we terminate the contract without cause prior to its expiration date. Because these
obligations are contingent on our termination of the contract without cause prior to its expiration
date, no obligation would exist unless such a termination occurs.
12
NOTE 6. EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS
Net periodic cost
The following table shows the components of net periodic cost:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Postretirement and |
|
|
Pension Benefits |
|
Postemployment Benefits |
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
March 31, |
|
March 31, |
(in millions) |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
Service cost |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
15 |
|
|
$ |
13 |
|
Interest cost |
|
|
246 |
|
|
|
251 |
|
|
|
49 |
|
|
|
51 |
|
Expected return on plan assets |
|
|
(169 |
) |
|
|
(154 |
) |
|
|
(23 |
) |
|
|
(19 |
) |
Amortization of prior service benefit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Recognized net actuarial loss (gain) |
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
Special termination and settlements |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
Net periodic cost |
|
$ |
91 |
|
|
$ |
107 |
|
|
$ |
39 |
|
|
$ |
50 |
|
|
NOTE 7. ACCUMULATED OTHER COMPREHENSIVE LOSS
The following table shows the components of accumulated other comprehensive loss:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrecognized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Benefits |
|
Derivative |
|
Marketable |
|
Valuation |
|
|
(in millions) |
|
Liability |
|
Instruments |
|
Equity Securities |
|
Allowance |
|
Total |
|
Balance at December 31, 2009 |
|
$ |
(2,012 |
) |
|
$ |
(345 |
) |
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
$ |
(1,207 |
) |
|
$ |
(3,563 |
) |
Pension and other benefit adjustments |
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11 |
|
Changes in fair value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33 |
|
Reclassification to earnings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17 |
|
Tax effect |
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
(19 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at March 31, 2010 |
|
$ |
(2,005 |
) |
|
$ |
(314 |
) |
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
$ |
(1,184 |
) |
|
$ |
(3,502 |
) |
|
NOTE 8. RESTRUCTURING AND MERGER-RELATED ITEMS
The following table shows charges recorded in restructuring and merger-related items on our
Consolidated Statements of Operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
March 31, |
(in millions) |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
Severance and related costs |
|
$ |
8 |
|
|
$ |
50 |
|
Merger-related items |
|
|
46 |
|
|
|
49 |
|
|
Total restructuring and merger-related items |
|
$ |
54 |
|
|
$ |
99 |
|
|
Severance and related costs primarily relate to voluntary workforce reduction programs for
U.S. employees. During the three months ended March 31, 2010, we recorded an $8 million severance
charge for one of our wholly-owned subsidiaries primarily associated with the consolidation of operations at the Cincinnati/Northern
Kentucky International Airport. During the three months ended March 31, 2009, we recorded $50
million primarily associated with voluntary workforce reduction programs, including $6 million of special termination
benefits related to retiree healthcare.
Merger-related items relate to costs associated with integrating the operations of Northwest
into Delta, including costs related to information technology, employee relocation and training,
and re-branding of aircraft and stations.
13
The following table shows the balances for restructuring charges as of March 31, 2010, and the
activity for the three months then ended:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liability |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liability |
|
|
Balance at |
|
Additional |
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at |
|
|
December 31, |
|
Costs and |
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
(in millions) |
|
2009 |
|
Expenses |
|
Payments |
|
2010 |
|
Severance and related costs |
|
$ |
69 |
|
|
$ |
8 |
|
|
$ |
(13 |
) |
|
$ |
64 |
|
Facilities and other |
|
|
74 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
67 |
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
143 |
|
|
$ |
8 |
|
|
$ |
(20 |
) |
|
$ |
131 |
|
|
NOTE 9. BANKRUPTCY CLAIMS RESOLUTION
In September 2005, we and substantially all of our subsidiaries (the Delta Debtors) filed
voluntary petitions for reorganization under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code. On April 30,
2007, the Delta Debtors emerged from bankruptcy. Under the Delta Debtors Joint Plan of
Reorganization (Deltas Plan of Reorganization), most holders of allowed general, unsecured
claims against the Delta Debtors received or will receive Delta common stock in satisfaction of
their claims. Deltas Plan of Reorganization contemplates the distribution of 400 million shares of
common stock, consisting of 386 million shares to holders of allowed, general, unsecured claims and
14 million shares to eligible non-contract, non-management employees. As of March 31, 2010, under
Deltas Plan of Reorganization, we have (1) distributed 333 million shares of common stock to
holders of $14.0 billion of allowed general, unsecured claims, (2) issued 14 million shares of
common stock to eligible non-contract, non-management employees and (3) reserved 53 million shares
of common stock for issuance to holders of allowed general, unsecured claims.
In September 2005, Northwest Airlines Corporation and substantially all of its subsidiaries
(the Northwest Debtors) filed voluntary petitions for reorganization under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code. On May 31, 2007, the Northwest Debtors emerged from bankruptcy. The Northwest
Debtors First Amended Joint and Consolidated Plan of Reorganization (Northwests Plan of
Reorganization) generally provides for the distribution of Northwest common stock to the Northwest
Debtors creditors, employees and others in satisfaction of allowed general, unsecured claims.
Pursuant to the Merger, each outstanding share of Northwest common stock (including shares issuable
pursuant to Northwests Plan of Reorganization) was converted into the right to receive 1.25 shares
of Delta common stock. As of March 31, 2010, five million shares of Delta common stock were
reserved for issuance in exchange for shares of Northwest common stock that, but for the Merger,
would have been issued under Northwests Plan of Reorganization.
The Delta Debtors and the Northwest Debtors will continue to settle claims and file objections
with the bankruptcy courts regarding claims. In light of the substantial number and amount of
claims filed, we expect the claims resolution process will take additional time to complete. We
believe there will be no further material impact to the Consolidated Statements of Operations from
the settlement of claims because the holders of such claims will receive under Deltas and
Northwests Plan of Reorganization, as the case may be, only their pro rata share of the
distributions of common stock contemplated by the applicable Plan of Reorganization.
NOTE 10. LOSS PER SHARE
We calculate basic loss per share by dividing the net loss by the weighted average number of
common shares outstanding. Shares issuable upon the satisfaction of certain conditions are
considered outstanding and included in the computation of basic loss per share. Accordingly, the
calculation of basic loss per share for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009 assumes
there was outstanding at the beginning of each of these periods (1) all 386 million shares of Delta
common stock contemplated by Deltas Plan of Reorganization to be distributed to holders of allowed
general, unsecured claims and (2) nine million shares of Delta common stock reserved for issuance
in exchange for shares of Northwest common stock that, but for the Merger, would have been issued
under Northwests Plan of Reorganization. Similarly, the calculation of basic loss per share for
the three months ended March 31, 2009 assumes there was outstanding at the beginning of the period
50 million shares of Delta common stock we agreed to issue on behalf of Delta and Northwest pilots
in connection with the Merger.
14
The following table shows the reconciliation of actual shares issued and outstanding to those
considered outstanding for purposes of the calculation of basic loss per share as of March 31,
2010:
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions) |
|
Shares(1) |
|
Common stock issued and outstanding |
|
|
787 |
|
Less: |
|
|
|
|
Unvested restricted stock |
|
|
(13 |
) |
Add: |
|
|
|
|
Shares reserved for future issuance under Deltas Plan of Reorganization |
|
|
53 |
|
Shares reserved for future issuance relating to Northwests Plan of
Reorganization, after giving effect to the 1.25 exchange ratio |
|
|
5 |
|
|
Common stock considered outstanding for purposes of loss per share calculation |
|
|
832 |
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
These shares have not been weighted to reflect the period of time they were
considered outstanding. |
The following table shows our computation of basic and diluted loss per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
March 31, |
(in millions, except per share data) |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
|
Basic and diluted: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss |
|
$ |
(256 |
) |
|
$ |
(794 |
) |
Weighted average shares outstanding |
|
|
832 |
(1) |
|
|
825 |
(2) |
|
Basic and diluted loss per share |
|
$ |
(0.31 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.96 |
) |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Excludes 35 million common stock equivalents because their effect was anti-dilutive. |
|
(2) |
|
Excludes 45 million common stock equivalents because their effect was anti-dilutive. |
15
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
General Information
We provide scheduled air transportation for passengers and cargo throughout the United States
(U.S.) and around the world. On October 29, 2008 (the Closing Date), a wholly-owned subsidiary
of ours merged (the Merger) with and into Northwest Airlines Corporation. On the Closing Date,
Northwest Airlines Corporation and its wholly-owned subsidiaries, including Northwest Airlines,
Inc. (collectively, Northwest), became wholly-owned subsidiaries of Delta.
On December 31, 2009, Northwest Airlines, Inc. merged with and into Delta. As a result of this
merger, Northwest Airlines, Inc. ceased to exist as a separate entity.
We believe the Northwest merger better positions us to manage through economic cycles and
volatile fuel prices, invest in our fleet, improve services for customers and achieve our strategic
objectives. We also believe the merger will generate approximately $2 billion in annual revenue and
cost synergies by 2012 from more effective aircraft utilization, a more comprehensive and
diversified route system, reduced overhead and improved operational efficiency.
March 2010 Quarter Financial Highlights
We reported a net loss of $256 million in the March 2010 quarter, compared to a net loss of
$794 million in the March 2009 quarter. The $538 million improvement primarily reflects (1) a
strengthening of the airline industry revenue environment due to improving economic conditions; and
(2) lower fuel expense due to a decline in fuel hedge losses, which was partially offset by higher
fuel prices in the March 2010 quarter.
Total operating revenue increased $164 million, or 2%, in the March 2010 quarter on a 4%
decrease in capacity, or available seat miles (ASMs), compared to the March 2009 quarter.
Passenger revenue per available seat mile (PRASM) improved 8% on a 5% increase in passenger mile
yield, reflecting an increase in demand for air travel and an overall increase in fares. During the
March 2009 quarter, the global recession had a significant negative impact on our operating
revenue.
Volatile fuel prices continue to represent a significant risk to our business and the airline
industry as a whole. Including our contract carriers under capacity purchase agreements, our
unhedged fuel price increased 46% to $2.22 per gallon compared to the March 2009 quarter. Our fuel
price, including the impact of our fuel hedge contracts, was $2.23 per gallon for the March 2010
quarter compared to $2.26 for the March 2009 quarter. We recorded $12 million in net fuel hedge
costs in the March 2010 quarter, compared to $686 million in fuel hedge losses in the March 2009
quarter. In an on-going effort to manage fuel price risk, we enter into derivative instruments to
hedge a portion of our projected aircraft fuel requirements. As of March 31, 2010, we have hedged
approximately 50% and 42% (with the intent to increase to 50%) of our projected fuel requirements
for the June 2010 quarter and nine months ended December 31, 2010, respectively. Our current hedge
portfolio primarily utilizes call options, which help us to mitigate the risk of aircraft fuel
price increases, while allowing us downside participation through market purchases should aircraft
fuel prices decline.
Our net loss for the March 2010 quarter includes a $64 million charge, which consists of $46
million of merger-related integration costs; a $10 million charge due to Venezuelas devaluation of
its currency; and an $8 million severance charge for one of our
wholly-owned subsidiaries primarily associated with the consolidation of
operations at Cincinnati/Northern Kentucky International Airport.
Our net loss for the March 2009 quarter includes a $101 million charge, which consists of a
$50 million severance charge in connection with voluntary workforce reduction programs; $49 million
of merger-related integration costs; and a $2 million charge for mark-to-market adjustments related
to fuel hedge contracts settling in future periods.
16
Our consolidated operating cost per ASM (CASM), excluding special items and fuel expense (a
non-GAAP financial measure as defined in Supplemental Information below), was 8.72 cents,
reflecting a 1% increase on 4% lower capacity compared to the March 2009 quarter. The 1% increase
is primarily due to (1) higher revenue-related expenses and (2) planned and weather-related
capacity reductions. We continue to focus on maintaining a competitive cost structure through
disciplined spending, productivity initiatives and accelerating merger synergies.
At March 31, 2010, we had $4.9 billion in cash and cash equivalents, and $690 million in
undrawn revolving credit facilities. During the March 2010 quarter, cash provided by operating
activities was $966 million. During that period, we invested $328 million in property and
equipment, including the purchase of two B-777-200LR aircraft. We contributed $225 million to our
defined benefit pension plans in the March 2010 quarter and an additional $440 million to those
plans in April 2010. As a result of these contributions, we satisfied, on an accelerated basis,
our minimum required contributions for our defined benefit pension plans for 2010.
Business Overview
Recent Initiatives. In 2009, we implemented a joint venture with Air France-KLM that
strengthens our transatlantic network, expanded our alliance agreement with Alaska Airlines and
Horizon Air to enhance our West coast presence, and received U.S. Department of Transportation
approval for a codesharing agreement with Virgin Blue, which will expand our network between the
U.S. and Australia and the South Pacific. We believe our global network, hub structure and
alliances with other airlines enables us to offer our customers an improved global reach compared
to other domestic and international airlines.
Expanding our support for New York City through increased corporate sales, improved facilities
and increased and new service from New York is a key component of our network strategy. We continue
to make investments in our international operation at New York-JFK and explore long-term options to
upgrade the facility. In August 2009, we announced our intention to make New Yorks LaGuardia
Airport a domestic hub through a slot transaction with US Airways. The agreement called for US
Airways to transfer 125 operating slot pairs to us at LaGuardia and for us to transfer 42 operating
slot pairs to US Airways at Reagan National Airport in Washington, D.C. We also plan to swap gates
at LaGuardia to consolidate all of our operations (including the Delta Shuttle) into an expanded
main terminal facility with 11 additional gates. The U.S. Department of Transportation issued a
tentative order on the transaction that would require the divestiture of 20 slot pairs at LaGuardia
and 14 slot pairs at Reagan National. In March 2010, we and US Airways announced an agreement,
which is subject to government approvals, to transfer to four airlines 12% of the operating slots
involved in the previously announced slot transaction. With the new six-way agreement, we would (1)
operate an additional 110 operating slot pairs at LaGuardia and transfer five operating slot pairs
each to AirTran Airways, Spirit Airlines, Inc. and WestJet Airlines Ltd. US Airways would operate
an additional 37 operating slot pairs at Reagan National and transfer five operating slot pairs to
JetBlue Airways Corporation.
We are investing $1 billion through mid-2013 to improve the customer experience and the
efficiency of our aircraft fleet. Planned enhancements include installing full flat-bed seats in
BusinessElite on 90 trans-oceanic aircraft, adding in-seat audio and video throughout Economy Class
on 68 widebody aircraft, adding First Class cabins to 66 CRJ-700 aircraft and installing winglets
on more than 170 aircraft to extend aircraft range and increase fuel efficiency.
Merger Synergies. We achieved more than $700 million in merger synergy benefits in 2009. We
are targeting an additional $600 million in merger synergy benefits in 2010, consisting of $350
million of revenue benefits and $250 million in cost reductions. In 2009, we completed a
significant portion of our merger integration, including combining frequent flyer programs,
consolidating and rebranding all airport facilities and achieving a single operating certificate
from the Federal Aviation Administration. In January 2010, we completed the integration of the
Northwest reservations system, including the transition of Northwest flights and passenger
reservations into the Delta system. We recently completed the migration of the Northwest fleet
into Deltas flight planning system.
17
Healthcare Reform
During the March 2010 quarter, Congress passed and the President signed new healthcare
legislation. While the new law may impact certain of our healthcare plans, we currently believe
this impact will not be material. We will continue to review the impact of the new law as
governmental agencies issue interpretations regarding its meaning and scope.
Results of Operations March 2010 and 2009 Quarters
Operating Revenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
vs. Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2009 |
|
|
Three Months |
|
Three Months |
|
|
|
|
|
% |
|
|
Ended |
|
Ended |
|
Increase |
|
Increase |
(in millions) |
|
March 31, 2010 |
|
March 31, 2009 |
|
(Decrease) |
|
(Decrease) |
|
Operating Revenue: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Passenger: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mainline |
|
$ |
4,486 |
|
|
$ |
4,367 |
|
|
$ |
119 |
|
|
|
3 |
% |
Regional carriers |
|
|
1,320 |
|
|
|
1,234 |
|
|
|
86 |
|
|
|
7 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Total passenger revenue |
|
|
5,806 |
|
|
|
5,601 |
|
|
|
205 |
|
|
|
4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cargo |
|
|
176 |
|
|
|
185 |
|
|
|
(9 |
) |
|
|
(5 |
)% |
Other, net |
|
|
866 |
|
|
|
898 |
|
|
|
(32 |
) |
|
|
(4 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
Total operating revenue |
|
$ |
6,848 |
|
|
$ |
6,684 |
|
|
$ |
164 |
|
|
|
2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase (Decrease) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
vs. Three Months Ended March 31, 2009 |
|
|
Three Months |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Passenger |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
Passenger |
|
RPMs |
|
ASMs |
|
Mile |
|
|
|
|
|
Load |
(in millions) |
|
2010 |
|
Revenue |
|
(Traffic) |
|
(Capacity) |
|
Yield |
|
PRASM |
|
Factor |
|
Passenger Revenue: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Domestic |
|
$ |
2,668 |
|
|
|
4 |
% |
|
|
(1 |
)% |
|
|
(2 |
)% |
|
|
5 |
% |
|
|
6 |
% |
|
0.5 pts |
Atlantic |
|
|
858 |
|
|
|
1 |
% |
|
|
(7 |
)% |
|
|
(14 |
)% |
|
|
8 |
% |
|
|
17 |
% |
|
6.1 pts |
Latin America |
|
|
395 |
|
|
|
|
% |
|
|
2 |
% |
|
|
|
% |
|
|
(2 |
)% |
|
|
|
% |
|
1.7 pts |
Pacific |
|
|
565 |
|
|
|
2 |
% |
|
|
4 |
% |
|
|
2 |
% |
|
|
(1 |
)% |
|
|
|
% |
|
1.4 pts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Mainline |
|
|
4,486 |
|
|
|
3 |
% |
|
|
(2 |
)% |
|
|
(5 |
)% |
|
|
5 |
% |
|
|
8 |
% |
|
2.2 pts |
Regional carriers |
|
|
1,320 |
|
|
|
7 |
% |
|
|
1 |
% |
|
|
(4 |
)% |
|
|
6 |
% |
|
|
11 |
% |
|
3.7 pts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total passenger revenue |
|
$ |
5,806 |
|
|
|
4 |
% |
|
|
(1 |
)% |
|
|
(4 |
)% |
|
|
5 |
% |
|
|
8 |
% |
|
2.4 pts |
|
Mainline Passenger Revenue. Mainline passenger revenue increased in the March 2010 quarter
compared to the March 2009 quarter primarily due to increased business demand for air travel,
partially offset by planned and weather-related capacity reductions. Passenger mile yield and
PRASM increased 5% and 8%, respectively. During the March 2009 quarter, the global recession had a
significant negative impact on our mainline passenger revenue.
|
|
|
Domestic Passenger Revenue. Domestic passenger revenue increased 4% from a 6% increase
in PRASM on a 2% decline in capacity. The passenger mile yield increased 5%, reflecting an
increase in business travel and an overall increase in fares. |
|
|
|
International Passenger Revenue. International passenger revenue increased 1% from a
4.3 point increase in load factor and a 9% increase in PRASM on a 7% decline in capacity.
The passenger mile yield increased 3%, reflecting (1) a slight increase in business and
leisure travel and (2) an increase in fares. The Atlantic market realized an 8% increase in
passenger mile yield, due to improved economic conditions after having experienced the
largest decline in passenger mile yield compared to our other international regions during
the March 2009 quarter due to the global recession. |
Regional carriers. Passenger revenue of regional carriers increased 7% from a 3.7 point
increase in load factor and an 11% increase in PRASM on a 4% decline in capacity. The passenger
mile yield increased 6%, reflecting an increase in demand for air travel and an increase in fares.
18
Cargo. Cargo revenue decreased due to capacity reductions, partially offset by increased cargo
yields and international volume. The results for the March 2009 quarter include the operations of
dedicated freighter B-747-200F aircraft. During 2009, we retired our entire fleet of dedicated
freighter B-747-200F aircraft.
Other, net. Other, net revenue decreased $32 million primarily due to a reduction in our
aircraft maintenance and repair service and lower administrative service charges, partially offset
by increased baggage fees.
Operating Expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
vs. Three Months Ended |
|
|
Three Months |
|
Three Months |
|
March 31, 2009 |
|
|
Ended |
|
Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
% |
|
|
March 31, |
|
March 31, |
|
Increase |
|
Increase |
(in millions) |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
(Decrease) |
|
(Decrease) |
|
Operating Expense: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aircraft fuel and related taxes |
|
$ |
1,683 |
|
|
$ |
1,893 |
|
|
$ |
(210 |
) |
|
|
(11 |
)% |
Salaries and related costs |
|
|
1,672 |
|
|
|
1,706 |
|
|
|
(34 |
) |
|
|
(2 |
)% |
Contract carrier arrangements |
|
|
917 |
|
|
|
908 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
1 |
% |
Contracted services |
|
|
392 |
|
|
|
432 |
|
|
|
(40 |
) |
|
|
(9 |
)% |
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
385 |
|
|
|
384 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
% |
Aircraft maintenance materials and outside repairs |
|
|
374 |
|
|
|
424 |
|
|
|
(50 |
) |
|
|
(12 |
)% |
Passenger commissions and other selling expenses |
|
|
364 |
|
|
|
356 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
2 |
% |
Landing fees and other rents |
|
|
313 |
|
|
|
316 |
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
)% |
Passenger service |
|
|
138 |
|
|
|
135 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
2 |
% |
Aircraft rent |
|
|
112 |
|
|
|
121 |
|
|
|
(9 |
) |
|
|
(7 |
)% |
Restructuring and merger-related items |
|
|
54 |
|
|
|
99 |
|
|
|
(45 |
) |
|
|
(45 |
)% |
Other |
|
|
376 |
|
|
|
393 |
|
|
|
(17 |
) |
|
|
(4 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expense |
|
$ |
6,780 |
|
|
$ |
7,167 |
|
|
$ |
(387 |
) |
|
|
(5 |
)% |
|
Aircraft fuel and related taxes. Aircraft fuel and related taxes decreased $210 million
primarily due to a reduction of (1) $674 million in fuel hedge losses and (2) $69 million from a 6%
decline in fuel consumption due to capacity reductions. These decreases were partially offset by
$533 million associated with higher average unhedged fuel prices. We recorded $12 million in net
fuel hedge costs in the March 2010 quarter, compared to $686 million in fuel hedge losses in the
March 2009 quarter. The fuel hedge losses in the March 2009 quarter were primarily from hedge
contracts purchased in 2008 when fuel prices reached record highs and were expected to continue to
rise.
Salaries and related costs. Salaries and related costs decreased $34 million primarily due to
(1) lower pension expense primarily from an increase in the value of our defined benefit plan
assets, (2) a 3% average decrease in staffing primarily related
to voluntary workforce reduction programs and
(3) capacity reductions.
Contract carrier arrangements. Contract carrier arrangements expense increased $9 million
primarily due to an increase of $75 million associated with higher average fuel prices, partially
offset by (1) lower overall expense from a reduction in capacity and (2) reduced contract carrier
rates from the transfer of ground handling services to one of our wholly-owned subsidiaries and
third party vendors.
Aircraft maintenance materials and outside repairs. Aircraft maintenance materials and outside
repairs decreased $50 million primarily from capacity reductions.
19
Restructuring and merger-related items. Restructuring and merger-related items decreased $45
million, primarily due to the following:
|
|
|
During the March 2010 quarter, we recorded (1) a $46 million charge for merger-related
items associated with integrating the operations of Northwest into Delta, including costs
related to information technology, employee relocation and training, and
re-branding of
aircraft and stations and (2) an $8 million severance
charge for one of our wholly-owned subsidiaries primarily associated with the
consolidation of operations at the Cincinnati/Northern Kentucky International Airport. |
|
|
|
During the March 2009 quarter, we recorded a $49 million charge for merger-related
items and $50 million in severance charges in connection with voluntary workforce reduction
programs. |
Other (Expense) Income
Other expense, net for the March 2010 quarter was $314 million, compared to $311 million for
the March 2009 quarter. This change is primarily attributable to an $18 million increase in
interest expense, partially offset by an increase in
interest income and a favorable change in miscellaneous, net due to the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Favorable (Unfavorable) vs. |
|
|
Three Months Ended |
(in millions) |
|
March 31, 2009 |
|
Miscellaneous, net |
|
|
|
|
Mark-to-market adjustments on the ineffective portion of fuel hedge contracts |
|
$ |
18 |
|
Loss associated with devaluation of Venezuelan currency |
|
|
(10 |
) |
Other |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
Total miscellaneous, net |
|
$ |
5 |
|
|
Income Taxes
We did not record an income tax benefit as a result of our March 2010 and 2009 quarter losses.
The deferred tax asset resulting from such net operating losses was fully reserved by a valuation
allowance.
Operating Statistics
The following table sets forth our operating statistics:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, |
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
Consolidated(1): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue passenger miles (RPMs) (millions) |
|
|
42,367 |
|
|
|
42,960 |
|
ASMs (millions) |
|
|
53,301 |
|
|
|
55,740 |
|
Passenger mile yield |
|
|
13.70 |
¢ |
|
|
13.04 |
¢ |
PRASM |
|
|
10.89 |
¢ |
|
|
10.05 |
¢ |
CASM |
|
|
12.72 |
¢ |
|
|
12.86 |
¢ |
Passenger load factor |
|
|
79.5 |
% |
|
|
77.1 |
% |
Fuel gallons consumed (millions) |
|
|
871 |
|
|
|
924 |
|
Average price per fuel gallon, net of hedging activity |
|
$ |
2.23 |
|
|
$ |
2.26 |
|
Full-time equivalent employees, end of period |
|
|
81,096 |
|
|
|
83,822 |
|
Mainline: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RPMs (millions) |
|
|
36,531 |
|
|
|
37,201 |
|
ASMs (millions) |
|
|
45,610 |
|
|
|
47,764 |
|
CASM |
|
|
11.62 |
¢ |
|
|
12.14 |
¢ |
Fuel gallons consumed (millions) |
|
|
697 |
|
|
|
740 |
|
Average price per fuel gallon, net of hedging activity |
|
$ |
2.22 |
|
|
$ |
2.43 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Except for full-time equivalent employees, includes the operations under capacity
purchase agreements with our regional air carriers and wholly-owned subsidiaries Comair, Inc., Compass Airlines, Inc. and Mesaba Aviation, Inc. |
20
Fleet Information
Our active aircraft fleet, orders, options and rolling options at March 31, 2010 are
summarized in the following table:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Fleet |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital |
|
Operating |
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rolling |
|
|
|
|
Aircraft Type |
|
Owned |
|
Lease |
|
Lease |
|
Total |
|
Age |
|
Orders(1) |
|
Options(2) |
|
Options(2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Passenger Aircraft: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
B-737-700 |
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
1.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
B-737-800 |
|
|
71 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
71 |
|
|
|
9.4 |
|
|
|
15 |
(3) |
|
|
60 |
|
|
|
94 |
|
|
|
|
|
B-747-400 |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
16.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
B-757-200 |
|
|
90 |
|
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
167 |
|
|
|
17.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
B-757-300 |
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
7.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
B-767-300 |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
18.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
B-767-300ER |
|
|
46 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
55 |
|
|
|
13.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
B-767-400ER |
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
9.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
B-777-200ER |
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
10.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
B-777-200LR |
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A319-100 |
|
|
55 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
57 |
|
|
|
8.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A320-200 |
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
69 |
|
|
|
15.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A330-200 |
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
5.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A330-300 |
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
4.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MD-88 |
|
|
63 |
|
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
117 |
|
|
|
19.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MD-90 |
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
14.3 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DC-9 |
|
|
58 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
58 |
|
|
|
38.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CRJ-100 |
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
62 |
|
|
|
12.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CRJ-200 |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
7.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CRJ-700 |
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
6.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CRJ-900 |
|
|
54 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
54 |
|
|
|
2.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SAAB 340B+ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
12.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EMB 175 |
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
2.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Aircraft |
|
|
673 |
|
|
|
105 |
|
|
|
188 |
|
|
|
966 |
|
|
|
13.6 |
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
131 |
|
|
|
94 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Excludes our orders of 18 B-787-8 aircraft. The Boeing Company (Boeing) has
informed us that Boeing will be unable to meet the contractual delivery schedule for these
aircraft. We are in discussions with Boeing regarding this situation. The table also
excludes our orders for five A319-100 and two A320-200 aircraft because we have the right to
cancel these orders. |
|
(2) |
|
Aircraft options have scheduled delivery slots, while rolling options replace
options and are assigned delivery slots as options expire or are exercised. |
|
(3) |
|
Includes 13 aircraft that we have entered into definitive agreements to sell to
third parties immediately following delivery of these aircraft to us by the manufacturer. |
The above table:
|
|
|
Excludes all grounded aircraft, including nine DC-9, eight CRJ-100, six SAAB 340B+ and
one B-767-300ER aircraft that were grounded during the three months ended March 31, 2010;
and |
|
|
|
|
Excludes 156 CRJ-200, 12 CRJ-700 and 10 CRJ-900 aircraft, which are operated by our
third party contract carriers on our behalf and included in the third party contract
carriers table below. |
During the three months ended March 31 2010, we accepted delivery of seven B-737-800, four
MD-90 and two B-777-200LR aircraft. The seven B-737-800 aircraft were immediately sold to third
parties.
21
The following table summarizes the aircraft fleet operated by third party contract carriers on
our behalf at March 31, 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fleet Type |
|
|
Carrier |
|
CRJ-200 |
|
CRJ-700 |
|
CRJ-900 |
|
EMB-145 |
|
EMB-175 |
|
Total |
|
Atlantic Southeast Airlines, Inc. |
|
|
104 |
|
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
152 |
|
Pinnacle Airlines, Inc. |
|
|
126 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
142 |
|
SkyWest Airlines, Inc. |
|
|
52 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
86 |
|
Chautauqua Airlines, Inc. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24 |
|
Freedom Airlines, Inc. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22 |
|
Shuttle America Corporation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
Total |
|
|
282 |
|
|
|
51 |
|
|
|
47 |
|
|
|
46 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
442 |
|
|
Financial Condition and Liquidity
We expect to meet our cash needs for the next twelve months from cash flows from operations,
cash and cash equivalents and financing arrangements. Our cash and cash
equivalents were $4.9 billion at March 31, 2010. We also have $690 million of additional cash
available from undrawn credit facilities. As of March 31, 2010, we have commitments from third
parties to finance, or definitive agreements to sell, all aircraft subject to purchase commitments,
except for seven previously owned MD-90 aircraft. Under these financing commitments third parties
have agreed to finance on a long-term basis a substantial portion of the purchase price of the
covered aircraft. For additional information regarding our aircraft purchase commitments, see Note
5 of the Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
The global economic recession in 2008 and 2009 weakened demand for air travel, decreasing our
revenue and negatively impacting our liquidity. In an effort to lessen the impact of the global
recession, we implemented initiatives to reduce costs, increase revenues and preserve liquidity,
primarily through reducing capacity to align with demand, workforce reduction programs and the
acceleration of merger synergy benefits. While we are seeing a strengthening of the airline
industry revenue environment due to improving economic conditions, the revenue environment
continues to be weaker than before the onset of the global recession. Moreover, fuel prices have
been increasing. Accordingly, we continue to focus on maintaining a competitive cost structure
through disciplined spending, productivity initiatives and accelerating merger synergies.
Our ability to obtain additional financing, if needed, on acceptable terms could be affected
by the fact that substantially all of our assets are subject to liens.
Liquidity Events
Liquidity events during the March 2010 quarter included the following:
|
|
|
American Express Agreement. In March 2010, we and American Express modified our
December 2008 agreement under which we received $1.0 billion from American Express for
their advance purchase of SkyMiles. The March 2010 modification, among other
things, changes the period for the use of the SkyMiles purchased in advance under
the agreement to a three-year period beginning in December 2011 from a two-year period
beginning in December 2010. For additional information, see Note 4 of the Notes to the
Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements. |
|
|
|
|
Pension Obligations. We sponsor a defined benefit pension plan for eligible non-pilot
Delta employees and retirees and defined benefit pension plans for eligible pre-merger
Northwest employees and retirees, all of which have been frozen for future benefit
accruals. Our funding obligations for these plans are governed by the Employee
Retirement Income Security Act. We contributed $225 million to our defined benefit
pension plans in the March 2010 quarter, and contributed an additional $440 million to
those plans in April 2010. As a result of these contributions, we satisfied, on an
accelerated basis, our minimum required contributions for our defined benefit pension
plans for 2010. |
22
Sources and Uses of Cash
Cash flows from operating activities
Cash provided by operating activities totaled $966 million for the March 2010 quarter,
primarily reflecting (1) a $918 million increase in advance ticket sales for summer travel and (2)
a $284 million increase in accounts payable and accrued liabilities. Cash provided by operating
activities for the March 2010 quarter was partially offset by (1) a $181 million increase in
accounts receivable associated with advance ticket sales and the timing of settlements and (2) $65
million in net loss after adjusting for non-cash items such as depreciation and amortization.
Cash provided by operating activities totaled $643 million for the March 2009 quarter,
primarily reflecting (1) the return of margin associated with the loss position of fuel hedge
contracts, which settled in the March 2009 quarter and (2) a $310 million increase in advance
ticket sales for summer travel. Cash provided by operating activities for the March 2009 quarter
was partially offset by (1) $219 million in settlements of our fuel hedge contracts for which the
loss was recognized in prior periods and (2) $180 million in net loss after adjusting for non-cash
items such as depreciation and amortization.
Cash flows from investing activities
Cash used in investing activities totaled $293 million for the March 2010 quarter, primarily
reflecting investments of $286 million for flight equipment and $42 million for ground property and
equipment, partially offset by a $73 million redemption of our investment in The Reserve Primary
Fund. Included in flight equipment acquisitions are two B-777-200LR and two MD-90 aircraft.
Cash used in investing activities totaled $272 million for the March 2009 quarter, primarily
reflecting investments of $386 million for flight equipment and $49 million for ground property and
equipment, partially offset by $74 million of proceeds from our sale of flight equipment and a $72
million redemption of our investment in The Reserve Primary Fund.
Cash flows from financing activities
Cash used in financing activities totaled $367 million for the March 2010 quarter reflecting
the repayment of $368 million in long-term debt and capital lease obligations.
Cash used in financing activities totaled $185 million for the March 2009 quarter, primarily
reflecting the repayment of $538 million in long-term debt and capital lease obligations, partially
offset by $356 million in proceeds primarily from long-term aircraft financing.
Application of Critical Accounting Policies
Critical Accounting Estimates
For information regarding our Critical Accounting Estimates, see the Application of Critical
Accounting Policies section of Item 7. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations in our Form 10-K.
Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements
In September 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Revenue Arrangements with
Multiple Deliverables. The standard revises guidance on (1) the determination of when individual
deliverables may be treated as separate units of accounting and (2) the allocation of transaction
consideration among separately identified deliverables. It also expands disclosure requirements
regarding an entitys multiple element revenue arrangements. The standard is effective for fiscal
years beginning on or after June 15, 2010, with early adoption permitted. We are currently
evaluating the impact the adoption of this standard will have on our Consolidated Financial
Statements.
23
Supplemental Information
We sometimes use information that is derived from our Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements, but that is not presented in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted
in the U.S. (GAAP). Certain of this information is considered non-GAAP financial measures under
the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission rules. The non-GAAP financial measures should be
considered in addition to results prepared in accordance with GAAP, but should not be considered a
substitute for or superior to GAAP results.
The following tables show reconciliations of non-GAAP financial measures to the corresponding
GAAP financial measures. We exclude special items and fuel hedge losses from CASM because
management believes the exclusion of these items is helpful to investors to evaluate the companys
recurring operational performance. We also exclude from CASM non-cash mark-to-market (MTM)
adjustments to fuel hedges settling in future periods in order to evaluate financial results
related to operations in the period presented.
We present CASM, excluding fuel expense and related taxes, because management believes the
volatility in fuel prices impacts the comparability of year-over-year financial performance. In
addition, we exclude special items because management believes the exclusion of these items is
helpful to investors to evaluate the companys recurring operational performance.
CASM excludes ancillary businesses which are not associated with the generation of a seat
mile. These businesses include aircraft maintenance and staffing services which we provide to third
parties, our dedicated freighter operations (in the March 2009 quarter) and our vacation wholesale
operations.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, |
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
CASM |
|
|
12.72 |
¢ |
|
|
12.86 |
¢ |
Ancillary businesses |
|
|
(0.26 |
) |
|
|
(0.34 |
) |
|
CASM excluding items not related to generation of a seat mile |
|
|
12.46 |
¢ |
|
|
12.52 |
¢ |
Items excluded: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restructuring and merger-related items |
|
|
(0.10 |
) |
|
|
(0.18 |
) |
MTM adjustments to fuel hedges settling in future periods |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.01 |
) |
|
CASM excluding special items |
|
|
12.36 |
¢ |
|
|
12.33 |
¢ |
Fuel expense and related taxes |
|
|
(3.64 |
) |
|
|
(3.70 |
) |
|
CASM excluding fuel expense and related taxes and special items |
|
|
8.72 |
¢ |
|
|
8.63 |
¢ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, |
|
(in millions) |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
Consolidated operating expense |
|
$ |
6,780 |
|
|
$ |
7,167 |
|
Less regional carriers operating expense |
|
|
(1,482 |
) |
|
|
(1,368 |
) |
|
Mainline operating expense |
|
$ |
5,298 |
|
|
$ |
5,799 |
|
|
24
ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
There have been no material changes in market risk from the information provided in Item 7A.
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk in our Form 10-K, other than those
discussed below.
The following sensitivity analyses do not consider the effects of a change in demand for air
travel, the economy as a whole or actions we may take to seek to mitigate our exposure to a
particular risk. For these and other reasons, the actual results of changes in these prices or
rates may differ materially from the following hypothetical results.
Aircraft Fuel Price Risk
Our results of operations are materially impacted by changes in aircraft fuel prices. In an
effort to manage our exposure to this risk, we periodically enter into derivative instruments
designated as cash flow hedges, which are comprised of crude oil, heating oil and jet fuel call
option, collar and swap contracts, to hedge a portion of our projected aircraft fuel requirements,
including those of our contract carriers under capacity purchase agreements.
As of March 31, 2010, our open fuel hedge position for the nine months ending December 31,
2010 and year ending December 31, 2011 is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contract Fair |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Value at |
|
|
Weighted |
|
Percentage of |
|
March 31, |
|
|
Average Contract |
|
Projected |
|
2010 Based Upon |
|
|
Strike Price |
|
Fuel Requirements |
|
$84 per Barrel of |
(in millions, unless otherwise stated) |
|
per Gallon |
|
Hedged |
|
Crude Oil |
|
2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Crude Oil |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Call options |
|
$ |
1.89 |
|
|
|
22 |
% |
|
$ |
151 |
|
Collars cap/ floor |
|
|
1.91/1.71 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
48 |
|
Swaps |
|
|
1.91 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
Jet Fuel |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Call options |
|
|
2.06 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
31 |
|
Swaps |
|
|
2.08 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
27 |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
42 |
% |
|
$ |
265 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Crude Oil |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Call options |
|
$ |
1.97 |
|
|
|
12 |
% |
|
$ |
130 |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
12 |
% |
|
$ |
130 |
|
|
For the March 2010 quarter, aircraft fuel and related taxes, including our contract carriers
under capacity purchase agreements, accounted for $1.9 billion, or 29%, of our total operating
expense, including $12 million of net fuel hedge costs. The following table shows the projected impact
to aircraft fuel expense and fuel hedge margin for the nine months ending December 31, 2010 based
on the impact of our open fuel hedge contracts at March 31, 2010, assuming the following per barrel
prices of crude oil:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fuel Hedge Margin |
|
|
|
Decrease |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Posted to) |
|
|
|
(Increase) to Fuel |
|
|
Hedge (Loss) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Received from |
|
(in millions) |
|
Expense(1) |
|
|
Gain(2) |
|
|
Net impact |
|
|
Counterparties |
|
|
$60 / barrel |
|
$ |
1,416 |
|
|
$ |
(168 |
) |
|
$ |
1,248 |
|
|
$ |
(41 |
) |
$80 / barrel |
|
|
(18 |
) |
|
|
99 |
|
|
|
81 |
|
|
|
24 |
|
$100 / barrel |
|
|
(1,452 |
) |
|
|
666 |
|
|
|
(786 |
) |
|
|
620 |
|
$120 / barrel |
|
|
(2,886 |
) |
|
|
1,275 |
|
|
|
(1,611 |
) |
|
|
1,395 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Projection based upon the decrease (increase) to fuel expense as compared to
the estimated crude oil price per barrel of $81 and estimated aircraft fuel consumption of 3.0
billion gallons for the nine months ending December 31, 2010 |
|
(2) |
|
Projection based upon average futures prices per gallon by contract settlement month |
25
ITEM 4. Controls and Procedures
Our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, performed
an evaluation of our disclosure controls and procedures, which have been designed to permit us to
effectively identify and timely disclose important information. Our management, including our Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, concluded that the controls and procedures were
effective as of March 31, 2010 to ensure that material information was accumulated and communicated
to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as
appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
Except as set forth below, during the three months ended March 31, 2010, we did not make any
changes in our internal control over financial reporting that have materially affected, or are
reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
On October 29, 2008, a wholly-owned subsidiary of ours merged with and into Northwest. On
December 31, 2009, Northwest merged with and into Delta, ending Northwests separate existence. We
are currently integrating policies, processes, people, technology and operations for the combined
company. Management will continue to evaluate our internal control over financial reporting as we
execute merger integration activities.
26
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of
Delta Air Lines, Inc.
We have reviewed the condensed consolidated balance sheet of Delta Air Lines, Inc. (the Company) as
of March 31, 2010, and the related condensed consolidated statements of operations for the
three-month periods ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, and the condensed consolidated statements of
cash flows for the three-month periods ended March 31, 2010 and 2009. These financial statements
are the responsibility of the Companys management.
We conducted our review in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight
Board (United States). A review of interim financial information consists principally of applying
analytical procedures and making inquiries of persons responsible for financial and accounting
matters. It is substantially less in scope than an audit conducted in accordance with standards of
the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board, the objective of which is the expression of an
opinion regarding the financial statements taken as a whole. Accordingly, we do not express such an
opinion.
Based on our review, we are not aware of any material modifications that should be made to the
accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements referred to above for them to be in
conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
We have previously audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting
Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheet of Delta Air Lines, Inc. as of
December 31, 2009 and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders equity, and
cash flows for the year ended December 31, 2009 and in our report dated February 24, 2010, we
expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements.
/s/ Ernst & Young LLP
Atlanta, Georgia
April 22, 2010
27
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 1. Legal Proceedings
Item 3. Legal Proceedings of our Form 10-K includes a discussion of our legal proceedings.
There have been no material changes from the legal proceedings described in our Form 10-K.
ITEM 1A. Risk Factors
Item 1A. Risk Factors of our Form 10-K includes a discussion of our risk factors. The
information presented below updates, and should be read in conjunction with, the risk factors and
information disclosed in our Form 10-K. Except as presented below, there have been no material
changes from the risk factors described in our Form 10-K.
Our business is subject to the effects of weather and natural disasters and seasonality, which can
cause our results to fluctuate.
Severe weather conditions and natural disasters can significantly disrupt service and create
air traffic control problems. These events decrease revenue and can also increase costs. In
addition, demand for air travel is typically higher in the June and September quarters,
particularly in international markets, because there is more vacation travel during these periods
than during the remainder of the year. As a result, our results of operations will reflect
fluctuations from weather and natural disasters and seasonality. Therefore, operating results for
a historical period are not necessarily indicative of operating results for a future period and
operating results for an interim period are not necessarily indicative of operating results for an
entire year.
ITEM 2. Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
We withheld the following shares of Delta common stock to satisfy tax withholding obligations
during the March 2010 quarter from the distributions described below. These shares may be deemed to
be issuer purchases of shares that are required to be disclosed pursuant to this Item.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maximum Number |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(or Approximate |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
Total Number of Shares |
|
Dollar Value) of Shares |
|
|
Number of |
|
Average |
|
Purchased as Part of |
|
That May Yet Be |
|
|
Shares |
|
Price Paid |
|
Publicly Announced |
|
Purchased Under the |
Period |
|
Purchased(1) |
|
Per Share |
|
Plans or Programs(1) |
|
Plan or Programs |
|
January 1-31, 2010 |
|
|
57,064 |
|
|
$ |
11.45 |
|
|
|
57,064 |
|
|
|
(1) |
|
February 1-28, 2010 |
|
|
528,876 |
|
|
$ |
12.63 |
|
|
|
528,876 |
|
|
|
(1) |
|
March 1-31, 2010 |
|
|
59,675 |
|
|
$ |
13.21 |
|
|
|
59,675 |
|
|
|
(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
645,615 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
645,615 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Shares were withheld from employees to satisfy certain tax withholding obligations
due in connection with grants of stock under our 2007 Performance Compensation Plan. The 2007
Performance Compensation Plan provides for the withholding of shares to satisfy tax
obligations. It does not specify a maximum number of shares that can be withheld for this
purpose. |
28
ITEM 5. Exhibits
(a) Exhibits
|
|
|
10.1
|
|
Description of Certain Benefits of Members of the Board of Directors and Executive Officers |
|
|
|
15
|
|
Letter from Ernst & Young LLP regarding unaudited interim financial information |
|
|
|
31.1
|
|
Certification by Deltas Chief Executive Officer with respect to Deltas Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
31.2
|
|
Certification by Deltas Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer with respect to
Deltas Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
32
|
|
Certification pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code by
Deltas Chief Executive Officer and Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer with
respect to Deltas Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2010 |
29
SIGNATURE
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Delta Air Lines, Inc. |
|
|
|
|
(Registrant) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Hank Halter |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hank Halter |
|
|
|
|
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
|
|
|
|
|
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
April 22, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
30