Edgar Filing: ArcSight Inc

FORM 10-Q

UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, DC 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)


þ		QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the Quarterly Period Ended July 31, 2009


o		TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the Transition Period from to

Commission File Number 001-33923

ArcSight, Inc.

(Exact name of the Registrant as Specified in its Charter)


Delaware		52-2241535
(State or Other Jurisdiction of		(I.R.S. Employer
Incorporation or Organization)		Identification No.)

5 Results Way
Cupertino, California 95014
(Address of Principal Executive Offices, including Zip Code)

(408) 864-2600
(Registrant’s Telephone Number, including Area Code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Sections 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. YES þ NO o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). YES o NO o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):


Large accelerated filer o	Accelerated filer þ	Non-accelerated filer o	Smaller reporting company o
		(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
Yes o No þ

Shares of ArcSight, Inc. common stock, $0.00001 par value per share, outstanding as of September 1, 2009: 33,175,002 shares.

ARCSIGHT, INC.

FORM 10-Q

Quarterly Period Ended July 31, 2009

TABLE OF CONTENTS


		Page
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION		3

ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS		3
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as of July 31, 2009 and April 30, 2009		3
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Three Months Ended July 31, 2009 and 2008		4
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Three Months Ended July 31, 2009 and 2008		5
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements		6

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS		23

ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK		38

ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES		38

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION		39

ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS		39

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS		39

ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS		54

ITEM 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES		54

ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS		54

ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION		54

ITEM 6. EXHIBITS		55

SIGNATURES		56
EX-10.01
EX-10.02
EX-31.01
EX-31.02
EX-32.01
EX-32.02

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

ARCSIGHT, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In thousands, except share amounts and par value)


	As of			As of
	July 31,			April 30,
	2009			2009
	(Unaudited)
Assets
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	101,460		$	90,467
Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $254 and $262, respectively		23,122			34,184
Capitalized software licenses, current		2,303			144
Other prepaid expenses and current assets		3,953			3,717

Total current assets		130,838			128,512
Property and equipment, net		5,326			4,416
Goodwill		5,746			5,746
Acquired intangible assets, net		1,097			1,319
Capitalized software licenses, non-current		1,913			—
Other long-term assets		1,166			1,168

Total assets	$	146,086		$	141,161

Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable	$	3,613		$	1,432
Accrued compensation and benefits		6,491			11,671
Obligations for software licenses, current		2,599			—
Other accrued liabilities		4,482			4,700
Deferred revenues, current		34,569			36,160

Total current liabilities		51,754			53,963
Deferred revenues, non-current		7,254			8,888
Obligations for software licenses, non-current		1,753			—
Other long-term liabilities		1,763			1,637

Total liabilities		62,524			64,488
Commitments and contingencies (see Note 5)
Stockholders’ equity:
Preferred stock, $0.00001 par value per share, 10,000,000 shares authorized; no shares issued and outstanding		—			—
Common stock, $0.00001 par value per share; 150,000,000 shares authorized; 33,153,053 and 32,248,116 issued and outstanding as of July 31, 2009 and April 30, 2009, respectively		—			—
Additional paid-in capital		119,526			113,781
Accumulated other comprehensive loss		(185	)		(314	)
Accumulated deficit		(35,779	)		(36,794	)

Total stockholders’ equity		83,562			76,673

Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	$	146,086		$	141,161

See accompanying Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

ARCSIGHT, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(In thousands, except per share data)
(Unaudited)


	Three Months Ended
	July 31,
	2009			2008
Revenues:
Products	$	18,265		$	15,802
Maintenance		11,919			8,568
Services		4,371			3,293

Total revenues		34,555			27,663

Cost of revenues:
Products		1,944			1,655
Maintenance(1)		1,925			1,631
Services(1)		2,630			2,043

Total cost of revenues		6,499			5,329

Gross profit		28,056			22,334
Operating expenses(1):
Research and development		5,598			5,315
Sales and marketing		14,785			14,868
General and administrative		6,018			4,349

Total operating expenses		26,401			24,532

Income (loss) from operations		1,655			(2,198	)
Interest income		28			404
Other income and (expense), net		(117	)		(99	)

Income (loss) before provision for (benefit from) income taxes		1,566			(1,893	)
Provision for (benefit from) income taxes		551			(563	)

Net income (loss)	$	1,015		$	(1,330	)

Net income (loss) per common share, basic	$	0.03		$	(0.04	)

Net income (loss) per common share, diluted	$	0.03		$	(0.04	)

Shares used in computing basic net income (loss) per common share		32,685			30,992

Shares used in computing diluted net income (loss) per common share		35,249			30,992


(1)		Stock-based compensation expense included in above (see Note 8):


Cost of maintenance revenues	$	80	$	46
Cost of services revenues		33		33
Research and development		429		339
Sales and marketing		612		751
General and administrative		776		234

See accompanying Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

ARCSIGHT, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
(In thousands)
(Unaudited)


	Three Months Ended
	July 31,
	2009			2008
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income (loss)	$	1,015		$	(1,330	)
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization		609			568
Amortization of acquired intangibles		222			211
Loss on disposal of property and equipment		—			3
Stock-based compensation		1,930			1,403
Excess tax benefit from stock-based compensation		(162	)		—
Provision for allowance for doubtful accounts		26			—
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable		11,036			9,335
Prepaid expenses and other assets		299			(74	)
Accounts payable		2,181			(567	)
Accrued compensation and benefits		(5,180	)		(6,273	)
Other accrued liabilities		239			1,013
Deferred revenues		(3,225	)		(501	)

Net cash provided by operating activities		8,990			3,788
Cash flows from investing activities:
Purchase of property and equipment		(1,339	)		(1,216	)

Net cash used in investing activities		(1,339	)		(1,216	)
Cash flows from financing activities:
Excess tax benefit from stock-based compensation		162			—
Proceeds from exercise of stock options, net of repurchases		3,653			143
Payment of capital lease and software license obligations		(599	)		(489	)

Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities		3,216			(346	)
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash		126			—

Net increase in cash and cash equivalents		10,993			2,226
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period		90,467			71,946

Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$	101,460		$	74,172

Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:
Capitalized software obligations	$	4,605		$	—

See accompanying Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

ARCSIGHT, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)

1. Description of Business

ArcSight, Inc. (“ArcSight” or the “Company”) is a leading provider of security and compliance management solutions that protect enterprises and government agencies. The Company’s products help customers comply with corporate and regulatory policy, safeguard their assets and processes and control risk. The Company’s platform collects and correlates user activity and event data across the enterprise so that businesses can rapidly identify, prioritize and respond to compliance violations, policy breaches, cybersecurity attacks and insider threats. The Company’s products collect and correlate massive numbers of events from thousands of security point solutions, network and computing devices and applications, enabling intelligent identification, prioritization and response to compliance and corporate policy violations and external and insider threats. The Company also provides complementary software that delivers pre-packaged analytics and reports tailored to specific security and compliance initiatives, as well as appliances that streamline event log collection, storage, analysis and reporting. The Company is headquartered in Cupertino, California, and was incorporated on May 3, 2000 under the laws of the state of Delaware.

2. Significant Accounting Policies

Basis of Presentation and Consolidation

The condensed consolidated balance sheet as of April 30, 2009 is derived from audited financial statements as of that date but does not include all of the information and footnotes required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States for complete financial statements. The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly-owned subsidiaries. All significant inter-company transactions have been eliminated on consolidation. These condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and related notes included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) on July 9, 2009.

In May 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 165 “Subsequent Events” (“SFAS 165”), which established general accounting standards and disclosure for subsequent events. The Company adopted SFAS 165 during the first quarter of 2010. In accordance with SFAS 165, the Company has evaluated subsequent events through the date and time the financial statements were issued on September 8, 2009.

Unaudited Interim Financial Information

The accompanying interim consolidated balance sheet as of July 31, 2009, and the consolidated statements of operations and cash flows for the three months ended July 31, 2009 and 2008 are unaudited. The unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared on the same basis as the annual consolidated financial statements and, in the opinion of management, reflect all adjustments, which include normal recurring adjustments, necessary to present fairly the Company’s financial position as of July 31, 2009, its results of operations and cash flows for the three months ended July 31, 2009 and 2008. The results of operations for the three months ended July 31, 2009 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for fiscal 2010 or for any other interim period or for any other future year.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements as well as the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. The Company bases its estimates and judgments on its historical experience, knowledge of current conditions, and its beliefs on what could occur in the future, given available information. Estimates, assumptions and judgments, are used for, but are not limited to, revenue recognition, determination of fair value of stock and stock-based awards, valuation of goodwill and intangible assets acquired in business combinations, impairment of goodwill and other intangible assets, amortization of intangible assets, contingencies and litigation, accounting for income taxes, including the valuation reserve on deferred tax assets and uncertain tax positions, allowances

for doubtful accounts, valuations of cash equivalents, and accrued liabilities. Actual results may differ from those estimates, and such differences may be material to the financial statements.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

The Company maintains its cash and cash equivalents in accounts consisting of high-credit quality financial instruments. The Company considers all highly liquid investments purchased with a maturity of three months or less at the date of purchase to be cash equivalents. The Company’s cash equivalents consist of money market accounts on deposit with two banks and are stated at cost, which approximates fair value.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The carrying amounts of cash equivalents, restricted cash, trade accounts receivable, accounts payable, and other accrued liabilities approximate their respective fair values due to the relatively short-term maturities. The carrying amounts of derivative financial instruments approximate their respective fair values due to adjusting these investments to their respective market values each reporting period.

Foreign Currency Translation

The functional currency of the Company’s foreign subsidiaries is the local currency. Adjustments resulting from translating foreign functional currency financial statements into U.S. dollars are recorded as a separate component of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss). Income and expense accounts are translated into U.S. dollars at average rates of exchange prevailing during the periods presented. All assets and liabilities denominated in a foreign currency are translated into U.S. dollars at the exchange rates in effect on the balance sheet dates.

Net foreign currency transaction losses of approximately $0.1 million for each of the three months ended July 31, 2009 and 2008 were primarily the result of the settlement of inter-company transactions and are included in other expense.

Derivative Financial Instruments

The majority of the Company’s sales are denominated in United States dollars; however, there are some sales transactions denominated in foreign currencies. In addition, the Company’s foreign subsidiaries pay their expenses in local currency. Therefore, movements in exchange rates could cause net sales and expenses to fluctuate, affecting the Company’s profitability and cash flows. The Company’s general practice is to use foreign currency forward contracts to reduce its exposure to foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations. Unrealized gains and losses associated with these foreign currency contracts are reflected in the Company’s balance sheet and recorded in prepaid expenses and other current assets or accrued expenses and other current liabilities. Changes in fair value and premiums paid for foreign currency contracts are recorded directly in other income and expense in the consolidated statements of operations. Cash flows from such derivatives are classified as operating activities. The objective of these contracts is to reduce the impact of foreign currency exchange rate movements on the Company’s operating results. During the first quarter of fiscal 2009 and 2008, the Company considered the net results of the use of foreign currency forward contracts to be an effective mechanism to minimize the fluctuations and movements in exchange rates that affect the Company’s profitability and cash flows. All of the Company’s foreign currency forward contracts mature within 12 months from the balance sheet date. The Company does not use derivatives for speculative or trading purposes, nor does the Company designate its derivative instruments as hedging instruments, as defined by the Financial Accounting Standard Board (“FASB”) under Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 133, “Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities” (“SFAS 133”).

Effective May 1, 2009, the Company adopted the disclosure requirements of SFAS No. 161, “Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities — an amendment of FASB Statement No. 133” (“SFAS 161”). At July 31, 2009 and April 30, 2009, the notional amount of outstanding foreign currency derivatives not designated as hedging instruments under SFAS 133 was $1.6 million, and $1.4 million, respectively. At July 31, 2009 and April 30, 2009, the fair value adjustment to mark these instruments to market was $0.1 million and $28,000, respectively, and are included in accrued expenses and other current liabilities in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets. For the three months ended July 31, 2009 and July 31, 2008, the Company recorded $0.1 million and $46,000, respectively, in other income and expense associated with foreign currency derivative contracts.

Concentration of Credit Risk and Business Risk

Financial instruments that potentially subject the Company to concentrations of credit risk consist principally of cash equivalents and accounts receivable. The Company is exposed to credit risk in the event of default by the financial institutions holding its cash and cash equivalents to the extent recorded on its balance sheet. Risks associated with cash equivalents are mitigated by banking with high-credit quality institutions. Such deposits may be in excess of insured limits. Management believes that the financial institutions that hold the Company’s investments are financially sound and, accordingly, minimal credit risk exists with respect to these investments. To date, the Company has not experienced any losses on its cash and cash equivalents. The Company performs periodic evaluations of the relative credit standing of the financial institutions.

The Company sells its products and maintenance and services directly to customers or through resellers in Asia Pacific, Europe, the Middle East and Africa (collectively, “EMEA”) and the Americas, with the majority of its sales in the United States. The Company monitors its exposure within accounts receivable and records an allowance against doubtful accounts as necessary. The Company performs ongoing credit evaluations of its customers and extends credit in the normal course of business and generally does not require collateral. Historically, the Company has not experienced significant credit losses on its accounts receivable. Management believes that any risk of loss for trade receivables is mitigated by the Company’s ongoing credit evaluations of its customers.

No customer or reseller accounted for more than 10% of total revenues for the three months ended July 31, 2009 and July 31, 2008. The Company had one customer with accounts receivable balances greater than 10% of the Company’s net accounts receivable, with a balance of 13% of net accounts receivable as of July 31, 2009. The Company had two customers with accounts receivable balances greater than 10% of the Company’s net accounts receivable, with balances of 17% and 11% of net accounts receivable as of April 30, 2009.

The majority of the Company’s revenues are derived from sales of the ESM product and related products and services, and the Company expects this to continue for the foreseeable future. As a result, although the Company has introduced complementary appliance products in fiscal 2009 and 2008 for which the Company uses a single source for manufacturing and fulfillment, the Company’s revenues and operating results will continue to depend significantly on the demand for the ArcSight ESM product. Demand for ArcSight ESM is affected by a number of factors, some of which are beyond the Company’s control, including the timing of development and release of new products by the Company and its competitors, technological change, lower-than-expected growth or a contraction in the worldwide market for enterprise security and compliance management solutions and other risks.

Revenue Recognition

The Company derives its revenues from three sources: (1) sales of software licenses and related appliances (“products”); (2) fees for maintenance to provide unspecified upgrades and customer technical support (“maintenance”); and (3) fees for services, which includes services performed in connection with time-and-materials based consulting agreements (“services”).

For all sales, revenues are subject to the guidance and requirements of American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (“AICPA”) Statement of Position (“SOP”) No. 97-2, “Software Revenue Recognition” (“SOP 97-2”), as amended by SOP No. 98-9, “Software Revenue Recognition with Respect to Certain Arrangements” (“SOP 98-9”).

The Company enters into software license agreements through direct sales to customers and through resellers. The license agreements include post-contract customer support and may include professional services deliverables. Post-contract customer support includes rights to receive unspecified software product updates and upgrades, maintenance releases and patches released during the term of the support period, and Internet and telephone access to technical support personnel and content. Professional services include installation and implementation of the Company’s software, staffing and management services for customer security operation centers (“SOCs”) and customer training. Professional services are not essential to the functionality of the associated licensed software.

For all sales, revenues attributable to an element in a customer arrangement are recognized when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists and delivery has occurred, provided the fee is fixed or determinable and collectibility is reasonably assured.

The Company typically uses a binding purchase order in conjunction with either a signed contract or a reference on the purchase order to the terms and conditions of the Company’s shrinkwrap or end-user license agreement as evidence of an arrangement. In circumstances where the customer does not issue purchase orders separate from a signed contract, the Company uses the signed

contract as evidence of the arrangement. Sales through its significant resellers are evidenced by a master agreement governing the relationship.

Resellers and systems integrators purchase products for specific end users and do not hold inventory. Resellers and systems integrators perform functions that include delivery to the end customer, installation or integration and post-sales service and support. The agreements with these resellers and systems integrators have terms that are generally consistent with the standard terms and conditions for the sale of the Company’s products and services to end users and do not provide for product rotation or pricing allowances. For sales to direct end-users, resellers and systems integrators, the Company recognizes product revenue upon transfer of title and risk of loss, which is generally upon shipment, provided all other criteria for revenue recognition have been met. Where sales are made through resellers, revenue is generally recorded only upon shipment to the end-users, when all other criteria for revenue recognition have been met. In a limited number of instances, where delivery is to be made to a reseller upon the request of either the end-user or the reseller, and all other criteria for revenue recognition have been met, it is the Company’s practice to recognize revenue on shipment to a reseller but only where an end-user has been identified prior to shipment. For end-users, resellers and system integrators, the Company generally has no significant obligations for future performance such as rights of return or pricing credits.

At the time of each transaction, the Company assesses whether the fees associated with the transaction are fixed or determinable. If a significant portion of a fee is due after the Company’s normal payment terms, currently up to three months (payment terms beyond three months are considered to be extended terms), or if as a result of customer acceptance provisions, the price is subject to refund or forfeiture, concession or other adjustment, then the Company considers the fee to not be fixed or determinable. In the limited instances in which these cases occur, revenues are deferred and recognized when payments become due and payable, or the right to refund or forfeiture, concession or adjustment, if any, lapses upon customer acceptance.

The Company assesses whether collection is reasonably assured based on a number of factors including the creditworthiness of the customer as determined by credit checks and analysis, past transaction history, geographic location and financial viability. The Company generally does not require collateral from customers. If the determination is made at the time of the transaction that collection of the fee is not reasonably assured, then all of the related revenues are deferred until the time that collection becomes reasonably assured, which in some cases requires the collection of cash prior to recognition of the related revenues.

The Company uses shipping documents, contractual terms and conditions and customer acceptance, when applicable, to verify delivery to the customer. For software license fees in arrangements that do not include customization, or services that are not considered essential to the functionality of the licenses, delivery is deemed to occur when the product is delivered to the customer. Services and consulting arrangements that are not essential to the functionality of the licensed product are recognized as revenues as these services are provided. Delivery of maintenance agreements is considered to occur on a straight-line basis ratably over the life of the contract, typically 12 months.

Vendor-specific objective evidence of fair value (“VSOE”) for maintenance and support services is based on separate sales and/or renewals to other customers or upon renewal rates quoted in contracts when the quoted renewal rates are deemed substantive in both rate and term. VSOE for professional services is established based on prices charged to customers when such services are sold separately. For deliverables and multiple element arrangements subject to SOP 97-2, as amended by SOP 98-9, when VSOE exists for all of the undelivered elements of the arrangement, but does not exist for the delivered elements in the arrangement, the Company recognizes revenues under the residual method. Under the residual method, at the outset of the arrangement with a customer, revenues are deferred for the fair value of the undelivered elements and revenues are recognized for the remainder of the arrangement fee attributable to the delivered elements (typically products) when all of the applicable criteria in SOP 97-2 have been met. In the event that VSOE for maintenance services does not exist, and this represents the only undelivered element, revenues for the entire arrangement are recognized ratably over the performance period. Revenues from maintenance and support agreements are recognized on a straight-line basis ratably over the life of the contract. Revenues from time-based (term) license sales that include ongoing delivery obligations throughout the term of the arrangement are recognized ratably over the term because the Company does not have VSOE for the undelivered elements.

Many of the Company’s product contracts include implementation and training services. When products are sold together with consulting services, license fees are recognized upon delivery, provided that (i) the criteria of software revenue recognition have been met, (ii) payment of the license fees is not dependent upon the performance of the services, and (iii) the services do not provide significant customization of the products and are not essential to the functionality of the software that was delivered. The Company does not typically provide significant customization of its software products. These services are typically recognized on a time-and-materials basis.

The cost of providing the Company’s products and maintenance and services consists primarily of direct material costs for products and the fully burdened cost of the Company’s service organization for maintenance and services. Shipping and handling charges incurred and billed to customers for product shipments are recorded in product revenue and related cost of product revenues in the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Operations. If it becomes probable that the amount allocated to an undelivered element will result in a loss on that element of the arrangement, the loss is recognized pursuant to SFAS No. 5, “Accounting for Contingencies” (“SFAS 5”).

Deferred revenues consist primarily of deferred product revenues, deferred maintenance fees and deferred services fees. Deferred revenues are recorded net of pre-billed services, post-contract customer support billings for which the term has not commenced and invoices for cash basis customers. Deferred product revenues generally relate to product sales being recognized ratably over the term of the licensing arrangement, and, to a lesser extent, partial shipments when the Company does not have VSOE for the undelivered elements and products that have been delivered but await customer acceptance. Deferred maintenance fees and consulting services generally relate to payments for maintenance and consulting services in advance of the time of delivery of services. These deferred amounts are expected to be recognized as revenues based on the policy outlined above.

Allowance for Doubtful Accounts

The Company maintains an allowance for doubtful accounts for potential future estimated losses resulting from the inability or unwillingness of certain customers to make all of their required payments. The allowance for doubtful accounts is based on the Company’s assessment of the collectibility of customer accounts. The Company regularly reviews the allowance by considering factors such as historical experience, credit quality, the age of the accounts receivable balances, and current economic conditions that may affect a customer’s ability to pay. This assessment requires significant judgment. When facts and circumstances indicate the collection of specific amounts or from specific customers is at risk, the Company assesses the impact on amounts recorded for bad debts and, if necessary, records a charge in the period the determination is made. If the financial condition of its customers or any of the other factors the Company uses to analyze creditworthiness were to worsen, additional allowances may be required, resulting in future operating losses that are not included in the allowance for doubtful accounts as of July 31, 2009 and April 30, 2009.

The following describes activity in the allowance for doubtful accounts for fiscal 2009 and the three months ended July 31, 2009 (in thousands):


			Addition
	Balance at		Charged to					Balance at
	Beginning		Costs and					End
Period	of Period		Expenses		Deductions(1)			of Period
Fiscal 2009	$	133	$	142	$	(13	)	$	262
Three months ended July 31, 2009	$	262	$	26	$	(34	)	$	254


(1)		Uncollectible amounts written off, net of recoveries.

Capitalized Software Licenses

On May 31, 2009, the Company renewed the software license agreement with Oracle USA, Inc. that authorizes the Company to integrate Oracle database software with the Company’s ArcSight ESM products and distribute ArcSight ESM products with the embedded database software. The agreement has a two year term that commenced on May 31, 2009 when the prior agreement with Oracle expired. The supporting royalty payments total $4.8 million over the license term. These software licenses represent purchases by the Company of the right to utilize and incorporate as a component of its product, the intellectual property of certain third parties. As a result of these purchases, the Company is contractually obligated to pay minimum royalties on fixed and determinable dates over a two-year period regardless of product sales being generated. In accordance with Accounting Principles Board Opinion (“APB”) No. 21, “Interest on Receivables and Payables,” these purchases have been recorded on the accompanying consolidated balance sheets based on the discounted present value of the Company’s contractual payment obligations. The capitalized software licenses are being amortized ratably over the respective two-year terms of the agreements and are included as a component of cost of product revenues and cost of maintenance revenues in the amount of $0.4 million and $0.2 million for the three months ended July 31, 2009, and $0.4 million and $0.2 million for the three months ended July 31, 2008, respectively. During the three months ended July 31, 2009 and July 31, 2008 payments under these agreements amounted to $0.6 million and $0.5 million with related interest expense of $12,000 and $38,000, respectively.

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets

Long-lived assets, such as property, plant and equipment and acquired intangible assets subject to amortization, are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable in accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 144, “Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets” (“SFAS 144”). Among the factors and circumstances considered by management in determining assessments of recoverability are: (i) a significant decrease in the market price of a long-lived asset; (ii) a significant adverse change in the extent or manner in which a long-lived asset is being used or in its physical condition; (iii) a significant adverse change in legal factors or in the business climate that could affect the value of a long-lived asset, including an adverse action or assessment by a regulator; (iv) an accumulation of costs significantly in excess of the amount originally expected for the acquisition or construction of a long-lived asset; (v) current-period operating or cash flow loss combined with a history of operating or cash flow losses or a projection or forecast that demonstrates continuing losses associated with the use of a long-lived asset; and (vi) a current expectation that, more likely than not, a long-lived asset will be sold or otherwise disposed of significantly before the end of its previously estimated useful life. Under SFAS 144, recoverability of assets to be held and used is measured by a comparison of the carrying amount of an asset to the estimated undiscounted future cash flows expected to be generated by the asset. If the carrying amount of an asset exceeds its estimated future cash flows, an impairment charge is recognized in the amount by which the carrying amount of the asset group exceeds the fair value of the asset. There have been no indicators of impairment and no impairment losses have been recorded by the Company in any period presented.

Property and Equipment, Net

Property and equipment are carried at cost, net of accumulated depreciation and amortization. Depreciation is computed using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the property and equipment typically ranging from two to five years. Leasehold improvements are recorded at cost with any reimbursement from the landlord being accounted for as an offset to rent expense using the straight-line method over the lease term. Leasehold improvements are amortized over the shorter of the remaining operating lease term or the useful lives of the assets.

Goodwill

Goodwill is not amortized, but rather it is periodically assessed for impairment.

The Company tests goodwill for impairment annually on November 1 of each fiscal year, and more frequently if events merit. The Company performs this fair-value based test in accordance with SFAS No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets.” Future goodwill impairment tests could result in a charge to earnings.

Software Development Costs

In accordance with SFAS No. 86, “Accounting for the Costs of Computer Software to Be Sold, Leased, or Otherwise Marketed,” costs incurred for the development of new software products are expensed as incurred until technological feasibility is established. Development costs are capitalized beginning when a product’s technological feasibility has been established and ending when the product is available for general release to customers. Technological feasibility is reached when the product reaches the beta stage using the working model approach. To date, the period of time between the establishment of a technologically feasible working model and the subsequent general release of the product have been of a relatively short duration of time and have resulted in insignificant amounts of costs qualifying for capitalization for all periods presented. Thus, all software development costs have been expensed as incurred in research and development expense.

Cost of Computer Software Developed or Obtained for Internal Use

For the costs incurred for computer software developed or obtained for internal use ArcSight follows the guidance of SOP No. 98-1, “Accounting for the Cost of Computer Software Developed or Obtained for Internal Use”, (“SOP 98-1”). SOP 98-1 sets forth the guidance for costs incurred for computer software developed or obtained for internal use and requires companies to capitalize qualifying computer software costs, which are incurred during the application development stage. These capitalized costs are to be amortized on a straight-line basis over the expected useful life of the software. Costs related to preliminary project activities and post-implementation activities are expensed as incurred. For the three months ended July 31, 2009, ArcSight has capitalized software costs for the development of internal use software amounting to $1.0 million. Amortization of these costs capitalized in accordance with SOP 98-1 will begin when the new software is ready for its intended use and will be amortized over the estimated useful life of the software generally on a straight-line basis unless another systematic and rational basis is more representative of the software’s use.

Research and Development Expenses

The Company expenses research and development expenses in the period in which these costs are incurred.

Advertising Expenses

Advertising costs are expensed as incurred. The Company incurred $28,000 and $0.1 million in advertising expenses for the three months ended July 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively.

Income Taxes

Provision for (benefit from) income taxes is calculated in accordance with SFAS No. 109 “Accounting for Income Taxes” (“SFAS 109”) APB No. 28, “Interim Financial Reporting,” (“APB 28”) and FASB Interpretation No. 18, “Accounting for Income Taxes in the Interim Period” (“FIN 18”) as amended by SFAS 109.

The Company adopted FASB Interpretation No. 48, “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes, an interpretation of SFAS 109” (“FIN 48”), on May 1, 2007.

Stock-Based Compensation Expense

Effective May 1, 2006, the Company adopted the provisions of SFAS No. 123(R) (revised 2004), “Share-Based Payment” (“SFAS 123R”), using the prospective-transition method. In accordance with SFAS 123R, measurement and recognition of compensation expense for all share-based payment awards made to employees and directors beginning on May 1, 2006 is recognized based on estimated fair values. SFAS 123R requires nonpublic companies that used the minimum value method under SFAS 123 for either recognition or pro forma disclosures to apply SFAS 123R using the prospective-transition method. In addition, the Company continued to amortize those awards granted prior to May 1, 2006 using the multiple option method as prescribed by FIN 28, as described above. As of April 30, 2009, amortization under the APB 25 minimum value method is complete. In accordance with SFAS 123R, the Company uses the Black-Scholes pricing model to determine the fair value of the stock options on the grant dates for stock awards made on or after May 1, 2006, and the Company amortizes the fair value of share-based payments on a straight-line basis.

The Company’s 2007 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (“ESPP”) became effective upon the effectiveness of the Initial Public Offering (“IPO”) on February 14, 2008. The ESPP provides for consecutive six-month offering periods, except for the first such offering period which commenced on February 14, 2008 and ended on September 15, 2008. The ESPP is compensatory and results in compensation cost accounted for under SFAS 123R. The Black-Scholes option pricing model is used to estimate the fair value of rights to acquire stock granted under the ESPP.

Comprehensive Income (Loss)

The Company reports comprehensive income (loss) in accordance with SFAS No. 130, “Reporting Comprehensive Income.” Comprehensive income (loss) includes certain unrealized gains and losses that are recorded as a component of stockholders’ equity and excluded from the determination of net income. The Company’s accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) consisted solely of cumulative currency translation adjustments resulting from the translation of the financial statements of its foreign subsidiaries. The tax effects on the foreign currency translation adjustments have not been significant.

Fair Value Measurement

In accordance with SFAS No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements”, (“SFAS 157”), the Company measures its financial assets and liabilities at fair value. On May 1, 2009, the Company adopted SFAS 157-2, for non-financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value. Non-recurring non-financial assets and non-financial liabilities include those measured at fair value in goodwill impairment tests and intangible assets measured at fair value for impairment. The adoption of SFAS 157-2 did not impact the condensed consolidated results of operations, financial condition or cash flows.

SFAS 157 clarifies that fair value is an exit price, representing the amount that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants. As such, fair value is a market-based measurement that should be determined based on assumptions that market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability. SFAS 157 establishes a three-tier value hierarchy, which prioritizes the inputs used in measuring fair value as follows:

	•		Level 1 - observable inputs such as unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets and liabilities;

	•		Level 2 - observable inputs such as quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets that are observable either directly or indirectly; and

	•		Level 3 - unobservable inputs in which there is little or no market data, which require the Company to develop its own assumptions.

This hierarchy requires the Company to use observable market data, when available, and to minimize the use of unobservable inputs when determining fair value. A financial asset or liability’s classification within the hierarchy is determined based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement. On a recurring basis, the Company measures certain financial assets, comprised of money market accounts based on Level 1 inputs, at fair value. The Company is required to measure and disclose the fair value of outstanding financial liabilities on a recurring basis. The fair value of financial obligations relating to the capitalized software licenses, based on quoted interest rates (Level 2 inputs) for the remaining duration of the liabilities, approximated carrying value.

In accordance with SFAS 157, the following table represents the Company’s fair value hierarchy for its financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of July 31, 2009 and April 30, 2009 (in thousands):


As of July 31, 2009:	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total
Cash and cash equivalents	$	101,460		—		—	$	101,460
Restricted cash		842		—		—		842
Capitalized software license obligations		—	$	4,216		—		4,216

Total	$	102,302	$	4,216		—	$	106,518


As of April 30, 2009:	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total
Cash and cash equivalents	$	90,467		—	$	—	$	90,467
Restricted cash		842		—		—		842

Total	$	91,309	$	—	$	—	$	91,309

In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, “The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities” (“SFAS 159”), including an amendment of SFAS No. 115, “Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities,” which allows an entity to choose to measure certain financial instruments and liabilities at fair value. Subsequent measurements for the financial instruments and liabilities an entity elects to measure at fair value will be recognized in earnings. SFAS 159 also establishes additional disclosure requirements. SFAS 159 is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. On May 1, 2008, the Company evaluated its existing financial instruments and liabilities and elected not to adopt the fair value option on its financial instruments. However, because the SFAS 159 election is based on an instrument-by-instrument election at the time the Company first recognizes an eligible item or enters into an eligible firm commitment, the Company may decide to exercise the option on new items when business reasons support doing so in the future. As a result, SFAS 159 did not have an impact on the Company’s financial condition or results of operations for the three months ended July 31, 2009 and 2008.

In October 2008, the FASB issued an FSP on SFAS No. 157-3, “Determining the Fair Value of a Financial Asset When the Market for That Asset Is Not Active” (“FSP 157-3”). FSP 157-3 clarified the application of SFAS 157. FSP 157-3 demonstrated how the fair value of a financial asset is determined when the market for that financial asset is inactive. FSP 157-3 was effective upon issuance, including prior periods for which financial statements had not been issued. The implementation of this standard did not have an impact on the Company’s consolidated results of operations, financial condition or cash flows.

In April 2009, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position No. 157-4, “Determining Fair Value When the Volume and Level of Activity for the Asset or Liability Have Significantly Decreased and Identifying Transactions That Are not Orderly”, (“FSP 157-4”). This FSP is effective for interim and annual reporting periods ending after June 15, 2009, and shall be applied prospectively. The Company adopted FSP 157-4 effective May 1, 2009, and its adoption did not impact the condensed consolidated results of operations, financial condition or cash flows.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141(R), “Business Combinations” (“SFAS 141R”), which replaces SFAS No. 141. SFAS 141R establishes principles and requirements for how an acquirer recognizes and measures in its financial statements the identifiable assets acquired, the liabilities assumed, and non-controlling interests in the acquiree and the goodwill acquired, in connection with a business combination. SFAS 141R also establishes disclosure requirements. SFAS 141R is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008. The Company adopted SFAS 141R effective May 1, 2009, and its adoption did not impact the condensed consolidated results of operations, financial condition or cash flows.

In April 2008, the FASB issued an FSP on SFAS No. 142-3, “Determination of the Useful Life of Intangible Assets” (“FSP 142-3”). FSP 142-3 amends the factors that should be considered in developing renewal or extension assumptions used to determine the useful life of a recognized intangible asset under FASB Statement No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets” (“Statement 142”). The intent of FSP 142-3 is to improve the consistency between the useful life of a recognized intangible asset under Statement 142 and the period of expected cash flows used to measure the fair value of the asset under FASB Statement No. 141 (revised 2007), “Business Combinations,” and other U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. FSP 142-3 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008, and early adoption is not permitted. The Company adopted FSP 142-3 effective May 1, 2009, and its adoption did not impact the condensed consolidated results of operations, financial condition or cash flows.

In February 2009, the FASB issued an FSP on SFAS No. 141(R)-a, “Accounting for Assets Acquired and Liabilities Assumed in a Business Combination” (“FSP 141R-a”). FSP 141R-a amends the provisions related to the initial recognition and measurement, subsequent measurement and disclosure of assets and liabilities arising from contingencies in a business combination under SFAS 141R. FSP 141R-a establishes principles and requirements for pre-acquisition contingencies and an acquiree’s pre-existing contingent consideration arrangement in a business combination measured under SFAS 141R. In addition, FSP 141R-a requires separate disclosure of recognized and unrecognized contingencies. FSP 141R-a has the same effective date as SFAS 141R, and is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008. The Company adopted FSP 141R-a effective May 1, 2009, and its adoption did not impact the condensed consolidated results of operations, financial condition or cash flows.

In April 2009, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position No. 107-1, “Interim Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments” (“FSP 107-1”). This FSP requires a public entity to disclose in the body or in the accompanying notes of its summarized financial information for interim reporting periods and in its financial statements for annual reporting periods the fair value of all financial instruments for which it is practicable to estimate that value, whether recognized or not recognized in the statement of financial position, as required by Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 107 “Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments” (“SFAS 107”). FSP 107-1 is effective for interim periods ending after June 15, 2009. The Company adopted FSP 107-1 effective May 1, 2009, and its adoption did not impact the condensed consolidated results of operations, financial condition or cash flows.

In May 2009, the FASB issued SFAS 165, “Subsequent Events”, which establishes principles and requirements for subsequent events. Subsequent events are events or transactions that occur after the balance sheet date but before financial statements are issued or are available to be issued. There are two types of subsequent events: (i) the first type consists of events or transactions that provide additional evidence about conditions that existed at the date of the balance sheet and (ii) the second type consists of events that provide evidence about conditions that did not exist at the date of the balance sheet but arose after that date. An entity shall recognize in its financial statements the effects of all subsequent events that provide additional evidence about conditions that existed at the date of the balance sheet, including the estimates inherent in the process of preparing financial statements. This statement is effective for interim or annual financial periods ending after June 15, 2009. The Company adopted this statement effective May 1, 2009.

In June 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 168, “The FASB Accounting Standards Codification and the Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles — a replacement of FASB Statement No. 162” (SFAS 168”), which approved the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (“Codification”) as the single source of authoritative United States accounting and reporting standards for all non-governmental entities, except for guidance issued by the SEC. The Codification, which changes the referencing of financial standards, is effective for interim or annual financial periods ending after September 15, 2009. The Company will adopt SFAS 168 effective August 1, 2009. All references made to generally accepted accounting principles in the United States (“U.S. GAAP”) will use the new Codification numbering system prescribed by the FASB. As the Codification is not intended to change or alter existing

U.S. GAAP, it is not expected to have any impact on the Company’s condensed consolidated results of operations, financial condition or cash flows.

3. Net Income (Loss) Per Common Share

Basic and diluted net loss per common share is computed using the weighted-average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the period. Potentially dilutive securities consisting of stock options, shares purchasable under employee stock purchase plan, and common stock subject to repurchase were not included in the diluted loss per common share computation for the three months ended July 31, 2008 because the inclusion of such shares would have had an anti-dilutive effect.

The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted net income (loss) per share (in thousands, except per share data):


	Three Months Ended
	July 31,
	2009		2008
Numerator for basic and diluted net income (loss) per share:
Net income (loss)	$	1,015	$	(1,330	)

Denominator for basic net income (loss) per share:
Weighted-average common shares, net of weighted-average shares subject to repurchase, used in computing net income (loss) per common share-basic		32,685		30,992

Denominator for diluted net income (loss) per share:
Shares used above, basic		32,685		—
Stock options		2,520		—
Shares purchasable under employee stock purchase plan		44		—


Denominator for diluted net income (loss) per share:		35,249		30,992

Net income (loss) per common share:
Net income (loss) per common share, basic	$	0.03	$	(0.04	)

Net income (loss) per common share, diluted	$	0.03	$	(0.04	)

As the Company had a net loss for the three months ended July 31, 2008, basic and diluted net loss per share are the same. The weighted-average shares used in the computation of basic and diluted net loss per share for the periods are presented net of shares subject to repurchase.

The following table sets forth the weighted-average number of shares subject to potentially dilutive outstanding securities, including common stock options, common stock subject to repurchase and employee stock purchase plan shares, that were excluded from the computation of diluted net loss per share for the periods presented because including them would have had an anti-dilutive effect (in thousands):


	Three Months Ended
	July 31,
	2009		2008
Options to purchase common stock		594		2,072
Common stock subject to repurchase		—		45
Shares purchasable under employee stock purchase plan		—		5

Total		594		2,122

4. Balance Sheet Details

Property and Equipment, Net

Property and equipment consisted of the following (in thousands):


	As of			As of
	July 31,			April 30,
	2009			2009
Computers and equipment	$	6,063		$	7,064
Furniture and fixtures		1,072			1,072
Software		1,755			788
Leasehold improvements		2,337			2,337

		11,227			11,261
Less: accumulated depreciation and amortization		(5,901	)		(6,845	)

Property and equipment, net	$	5,326		$	4,416

Depreciation expense was $0.5 million for each of the three months ended July 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively. Amortization expense was $0.1 million for both the three months ended July 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively.

Goodwill and Intangible Assets, Net

The estimated useful lives, gross carrying amount, accumulated amortization and net book value of goodwill and intangible assets as of July 31, 2009 and April 30, 2009 are as follows (dollars in thousands):


	Estimated
	Weighted-
	Average		Gross
	Useful Lives		Carrying		Accumulated			Net Carrying
As of July 31, 2009:	in Years		Amount		Amortization			Amount
Core and developed technologies		5.00	$	1,970	$	(1,123	)	$	847
Customer installed-base relationships		6.00		80		(56	)		24
Employee non-compete agreements		5.00		1,160		(934	)		226

Total			$	3,210	$	(2,113	)	$	1,097

Goodwill								$	5,746


	Estimated
	Weighted-
	Average		Gross
	Useful Lives		Carrying		Accumulated			Net Carrying
As of April 30, 2009:	in Years		Amount		Amortization			Amount
Core and developed technologies		5.00	$	1,970	$	(960	)	$	1,010
Customer installed-base relationships		6.00		80		(53	)		27
Employee non-compete agreements		5.00		1,160		(878	)		282

Total			$	3,210	$	(1,891	)	$	1,319

Goodwill								$	5,746

Acquired intangible assets other than goodwill are amortized over their respective estimated useful lives to match the amortization to the benefits received. The total amortization expense related to intangible assets was $0.2 million and $0.2 million for the three months ended July 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively.

There was no impairment of goodwill or intangible assets for the three months ended July 31, 2009 or in fiscal 2009.

As of July 31, 2009, future estimated amortization costs per year for the Company’s existing intangible assets other than goodwill are estimated as follows (in thousands):


	Estimated
	Amortization
As of July 31, 2009:	Expense
Remainder of fiscal 2010	$	667
Fiscal 2011		425
Fiscal 2012		5

Total	$	1,097

Deferred Revenues

Deferred revenues consist of the following (in thousands):


	As of			As of
	July 31,			April 30,
	2009			2009
Deferred product revenues	$	7,931		$	9,786
Deferred maintenance revenues		30,939			32,408
Deferred services revenues		2,953			2,854

Total deferred revenues		41,823			45,048
Less deferred revenues, current portion		(34,569	)		(36,160	)

Deferred revenues, non-current	$	7,254		$	8,888

5. Commitments and Contingencies

The Company and its subsidiaries operate from leased premises in the United States, Asia and Europe with lease periods expiring through 2014. In April 2007, the Company entered into a lease extension through October 2013, and added additional office space to the lease for the corporate headquarters. This lease agreement includes a rent escalation clause of 4% per annual lease term through expiration in October 2013. The lease agreement includes leasehold improvement allowances in the amount of $0.7 million which is recorded as deferred rent and amortized as reductions to rent expense on a straight line basis over the remainder of the lease term. The lease agreement also includes a renewal period at the Company’s option for an additional 5 years at the then current fair market value. The Company recognizes expense for scheduled rent increases on a straight-line basis over the lease term beginning with the date the Company takes possession of the leased space.

Future minimum lease payments under the Company’s noncancelable operating leases as of July 31, 2009 are as follows (in thousands):


	Amount of
As of July 31, 2009:	Payments
Remainder of fiscal 2010	$	1,770
2011		2,057
2012		2,068
2013		2,151
2014		1,118

Total future minimum lease payments	$	9,164

Rent expense under all operating leases was approximately $0.9 million and $0.7 million for the three months ended July 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively.

From time to time, the Company is subject to various claims, complaints and legal actions in the normal course of business. The Company does not believe it is party to any currently pending litigation, the outcome of which will have a material adverse effect on our operations or financial position.

6. Indemnification and Warranties

The Company from time to time enters into certain types of contracts that contingently require it to indemnify various parties against claims from third parties. These contracts primarily relate to (i) certain real estate leases under which the Company may be required to indemnify property owners for environmental and other liabilities and other claims arising from the Company’s use of the applicable premises, (ii) the Company’s bylaws, under which it must indemnify directors and executive officers, and may indemnify other officers and employees, for liabilities arising out of their relationship, (iii) contracts under which the Company must indemnify directors and certain officers for liabilities arising out of their relationship, (iv) contracts under which the Company may be required to indemnify customers or resellers against third-party claims, including claims that a Company product infringes a patent, copyright or other intellectual property right, and (v) procurement, consulting, or license agreements under which the Company may be required to indemnify vendors, consultants or licensors for certain claims, including claims that may be brought against them arising from the Company’s acts or omissions with respect to the supplied products or technology.

In the event that one or more of these matters were to result in a claim against the Company, an adverse outcome, including a judgment or settlement, may cause a material adverse effect on the Company’s future business, operating results or financial condition. It is not possible to determine the maximum potential amount under these indemnification agreements due to the limited history of prior indemnification claims and the unique facts and circumstances involved in each particular agreement.

The Company maintains director and officer insurance, which may cover certain liabilities arising from its obligation to indemnify its directors. To date, the Company has not been required to make any payment resulting from infringement claims asserted against its customers and has not recorded any related accruals.

The Company generally provides a warranty for its products and services to its customers and accounts for its warranties under SFAS 5. To date, the Company’s product warranty expense has not been significant. Accordingly, the Company has not recorded a warranty reserve as of July 31, 2009 or April 30, 2009.

7. Stockholders’ Equity

Common Stock Reserved for Issuance

Number of shares of common stock reserved for future issuance is as follows:


	As of July 31,
	2009
Options available for future grant under the 2007 Equity Incentive Plan		3,404,851
Options outstanding under the stock option plans		7,151,307
ESPP shares reserved for future issuance		941,736

Total shares reserved		11,497,894

Stock Plans

2007 Equity Incentive Plan. A total of 4,569,015 shares of the Company’s common stock were originally authorized for future issuance under the 2007 Equity Incentive Plan, including shares that became available for grant upon the concurrent termination of the Company’s 2002 Stock Plan. During fiscal 2009, the Company registered with the SEC 1,260,416 additional shares of the Company’s common stock to be issuable under the 2007 Equity Incentive Plan. As of July 31, 2009, since adoption of the 2007 Equity Incentive Plan, an aggregate of 1,870,679 of additional shares issued under the Company’s prior stock option plans, have become available for grant and issuance as a result of forfeitures or repurchases by the Company.

2007 Employee Stock Purchase Plan. A total of 1,000,000 shares of the Company’s common stock were originally authorized. During fiscal 2009, a total of 315,104 additional shares were registered for issuance under the 2007 Employee Stock Purchase Plan.

Stock Plan Activity

A summary of the option activity under the 2007 Equity Incentive Plan, the 2002 Stock Plan and the 2000 Stock Incentive Plan for the three months ended July 31, 2009, is as follows:


	Outstanding Options
							Weighted-		Weighted-
							Average		Average
	Shares						Exercise		Remaining		Aggregate
	Available			Number of			Price		Contractual		Intrinsic
	for Grant			Shares			per Share		Term (Years)		Value
											(In thousands)
Options outstanding as of April 30, 2009		4,520,099			6,940,996			6.10		7.30	$	62,464

Options authorized		—			—			—
Options granted		(1,209,753	)		1,209,753			17.84
Options exercised		—			(904,937	)		4.04
Options canceled		94,505			(94,505	)		10.26
Shares repurchased		—			—

Options outstanding as of July 31, 2009		3,404,851			7,151,307			8.29		7.77		76,352

Vested and expected to vest as of July 31, 2009, net of anticipated forfeitures					5,590,177			8.29		7.77		59,684

Vested and exercisable as of July 31, 2009					3,369,689			5.19		6.60		46,438

The aggregate intrinsic values shown in the table above are equal to the difference between the per share exercise price of the underlying stock options and the fair value of the Company’s common stock as of the respective dates in the table.

The following table summarizes additional information regarding outstanding options as of July 31, 2009:


	Options Outstanding				Options Vested and Exercisable
			Weighted-
			Average				Weighted-
			Remaining				Average
	Number		Contractual		Number of		Exercise
Exercise Price	Outstanding		Life (Years)		Shares		Price per Share
$0.12-0.40		448,342		3.60		448,342	$	0.20
$0.48-0.80		432,951		5.38		432,951		0.68
$4.00		548,210		5.92		539,064		4.00
$4.74-5.98		333,407		9.31		—		—
$6.08-6.80		1,722,119		7.29		1,197,587		6.58
$7.17-8.95		1,225,073		8.69		226,402		8.31
$9.00-9.95		237,483		8.26		99,099		9.17
$10.00		949,869		8.18		416,953		10.00
$11.08-19.16		1,253,853		9.84		9,291		12.05

		7,151,307		7.77		3,369,689	$	5.19

Total intrinsic value of options exercised for the three months ended July 31, 2009 was $12.0 million, determined at the date of option exercise.

8. Stock-Based Compensation

During the three months ended July 31, 2009 and 2008, the Company recorded stock-based compensation as described below (in thousands):


	Three Months Ended
	July 31,
	2009		2008
Stock-based compensation under SFAS 123R	$	1,683	$	1,104
Stock-based compensation under prospective transition method for option awards granted prior to the adoption of SFAS 123R		—		10
Amortization of restricted stock awards in connection with the acquisition of Enira Technologies, LLC		—		33
Stock-based compensation under employee stock purchase plan		247		256

Total	$	1,930	$	1,403

Adoption of SFAS 123R

On May 1, 2006, the Company adopted SFAS 123R, which establishes standards for the accounting of transactions in which an entity exchanges its equity instruments for goods or services, primarily focusing on accounting for transactions where an entity obtains employee services in stock-based payment transactions. SFAS 123R requires the Company to measure the cost of employee services received in exchange for an award of equity instruments, including stock options, based on the grant-date fair value of the award and to recognize it as compensation expense over the period the employee is required to provide service in exchange for the award, usually the vesting period. SFAS 123R superseded the Company’s previous accounting under APB 25 beginning May 1, 2006.

The Company adopted SFAS 123R using the prospective-transition method, which requires the application of the accounting standard as of May 1, 2006, the first day of fiscal 2007. The Company used the Black-Scholes-Merton (“Black-Scholes”) option pricing model to determine the fair value of option awards granted. The Black-Scholes model requires, among other inputs, an estimate of the fair value of the underlying common stock on the date of grant and assumptions as to volatility of the Company’s stock over the term of the related options, the expected term of the options, the risk-free interest rate and the option forfeiture rate. These assumptions used in the pricing model are determined by the Company at each grant date. As there was no public market for the

Company’s common stock prior to the IPO, the Company determined the volatility for options granted in fiscal periods prior to the IPO, based on an analysis of reported data for a peer group of companies that issued options with substantially similar terms. Since the IPO, the expected volatility of options granted has been determined using a combination of weighted-average measures of the peer group of companies of the implied volatility and the historical volatility for a period equal to the expected life of the option, and the Company’s historical volatility. The expected life of options has been determined considering the expected life of options granted by a group of peer companies and the average vesting and contractual term of the Company’s options. The risk-free interest rate is based on a zero coupon United States treasury instrument whose term is consistent with the expected life of the stock options. As the Company has not paid and does not anticipate paying cash dividends on outstanding shares of common stock, the expected dividend yield is assumed to be zero. In addition, SFAS 123R requires companies to utilize an estimated forfeiture rate when calculating the expense for the period, whereas SFAS 123 permitted companies to record forfeitures based on actual forfeitures, which was the Company’s historical policy under SFAS 123. The Company applied an estimated annual forfeiture rate of 5%, based on its historical forfeiture experience during the previous six years, in determining the expense recorded in its consolidated statement of operations.

SFAS 123R requires the cash flows resulting from the tax benefits resulting from tax deductions in excess of the compensation cost recognized for those option exercises to be classified as financing cash flows. For the three months ended July 31, 2009, the Company recorded excess tax benefits resulting from tax deductions in excess of the compensation cost recognized amounting to $0.2 million. Due to the Company’s historical loss position and current valuation allowance, no tax benefits have been realized or recorded for any of the prior periods presented. Prior to the adoption of SFAS 123R those benefits would have been reported as operating cash flows had the Company received any tax benefits related to stock option exercises.

Valuation and Expense Information under SFAS 123R

The weighted-average fair value calculations for options granted within the period are based on the following weighted-average assumptions set forth in the table below and assume no dividends will be paid. Options that were granted in prior periods are based on assumptions prevailing at the date of grant.


	Three Months Ended
	July 31,
	2009			2008
Risk-free interest rate		2.26	%		3.17	%
Expected volatility		58	%		53	%
Expected life (years)	5.66 years			5.74 years

Based on these calculations, the weighted-average fair value per share of common stock was $9.60 per share for the three months ended July 31, 2009. The compensation costs that have been included in the Company’s results of operations for these stock-based compensation arrangements for the three months ended July 31, 2009 and 2008, as a result of the Company’s adoption of SFAS 123R, were as follows (in thousands):


	Three Months Ended
	July 31,
	2009		2008
Cost of maintenance revenues	$	55	$	28
Cost of services revenues		26		23

SFAS 123R expense included in cost of revenues		81		51
Operating expenses:
Research and development		306		206
Sales and marketing		539		652
General and administrative		757		195

SFAS 123R expense included in operating expenses		1,602		1,053

SFAS 123R expense included in net income (loss)	$	1,683	$	1,104

Because the amount of stock-based compensation associated with the Company’s cost of products is not significant, no amounts have been capitalized for any of the periods presented.

As of July 31, 2009 and 2008, there was $19.6 million and $12.3 million, respectively, of total unrecognized stock based compensation expenses under SFAS 123R, net of estimated forfeitures, that the Company expects to recognize over the requisite service period. Total unrecognized stock based compensation expenses related to non-vested awards are expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 3.05 years. The total fair value of all shares vested during the quarter ended July 31, 2009 was $1.7 million.

During the three months ended July 31, 2009, the Company granted 1,209,753 options. These options have exercise prices equal to the closing price of the Company’s common stock as quoted on the NASDAQ on the day of grant (or the most recent trading day if the date of grant is not a NASDAQ trading day), with exercise prices ranging from $14.33 to $19.16 per share at a weighted-average per share price of $17.84.

Employee Stock Purchase Plan

In November 2007, the Board of Directors and the Company’s stockholders approved the 2007 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the “ESPP”), which became effective upon the Company’s IPO on February 14, 2008. A total of 1,315,104 shares of the Company’s common stock have been reserved for issuance under the ESPP since inception, including the annual increase in January 2009 pursuant to its “evergreen” provision. Under the ESPP, employees may purchase shares of common stock at a price that is 85% of the lesser of the fair market value of the Company’s common stock as of beginning or the end of each offering period. The ESPP provides for consecutive offering periods of six months each, except for the first such offering period which commenced on February 14, 2008 and ended on September 15, 2008.

In fiscal 2009, 373,368 shares were purchased under the ESPP at a weighted average purchase price per share of $7.37. Total cash proceeds from the purchase of shares under the ESPP was $2.8 million. No shares were purchased under the ESPP during the period ended July 31, 2009. As of July 31, 2009 there was an aggregate of 941,736 shares of common stock available for issuance pursuant to future rights to acquire stock under the ESPP.

The ESPP is compensatory and results in compensation cost accounted for under SFAS 123R. The Black-Scholes option pricing model is used to estimate the fair value of rights to acquire stock granted under the ESPP. The weighted-average fair value calculations for rights to acquire stock under the ESPP within the period are based on the following weighted-average assumptions set forth in the table below, assuming no dividends will be paid, and based on assumptions prevailing as of the enrollment date of the offering period.


	Three Months Ended
	July 31,
	2009			2008
Risk-free interest rate		0.46	%		2.11	%
Expected volatility		79	%		53	%
Expected term (in years)	0.50 years			0.58 years

Based on these calculations, the weighted-average fair value per share of common stock was $4.37 and $2.77 per share for the three months ended July 31, 2009 and July 31, 2008, respectively. For the three months ended July 31, 2009 and July 31, 2008, the Company recorded stock-based compensation expense associated with its ESPP of $0.2 million and $0.3 million, respectively. As of July 31, 2009, there was $0.1 million of total unrecognized compensation expenses under SFAS 123R, net of expected forfeitures, related to common stock purchase rights that the Company expects to amortize over the remaining offering period ending September 15, 2009.

9. Segment Information

The Company operates in one industry segment selling security and compliance management solutions.

SFAS No. 131, “Disclosures about Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information,” establishes standards for reporting information about operating segments. Operating segments are defined as components of an enterprise for which separate financial information is available and is evaluated regularly by the chief operating decision maker, or decision making group, in deciding how to allocate resources and in assessing performance. The Company’s chief operating decision maker is the Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”). The CEO reviews financial information presented on a consolidated basis for evaluating financial performance and allocating resources. There are no segment managers who are held accountable for operations below the consolidated financial statement level. Accordingly, the Company has determined that it operates in a single reportable segment.

The CEO evaluates performance based primarily on revenues in the geographic locations in which the Company operates. Revenues are attributed to geographic locations based on the ship-to location of the Company’s customers. The Company’s assets are

primarily located in the United States and not allocated to any specific region. Therefore, geographic information is presented only for total revenues. As of July 31, 2009 and 2008, long-lived assets, which represent property, plant and equipment, goodwill and intangible assets, net of accumulated depreciation and amortization, located outside the Americas were immaterial and less than one percent of the total net assets as of these dates.

Total revenues by geographical region are based on the ship-to location and are as follows (in thousands):


	Three Months Ended
	July 31,
	2009		2008
Total revenues by geography:
United States:
Products	$	14,726	$	11,409
Maintenance		8,931		6,358
Services		3,230		2,526

Total		26,887		20,293

EMEA:
Products		2,612		2,694
Maintenance		1,644		1,349
Services		515		473

Total		4,771		4,516

Asia Pacific:
Products		490		1,209
Maintenance		524		393
Services		48		183

Total		1,062		1,785

Other Americas:
Products		437		490
Maintenance		820		468
Services		578		111

Total		1,835		1,069

Total revenues	$	34,555	$	27,663

10. Income Taxes

Provision for (benefit from) income taxes is calculated in accordance with SFAS No. 109 “Accounting for Income Taxes” (“SFAS 109”), APB No. 28, “Interim Financial Reporting,” (“APB 28”), and FASB Interpretation No. 18, “Accounting for Income Taxes in the Interim Period” (“FIN 18”) as amended by SFAS 109.

The Company estimates income taxes in each of the jurisdictions in which it operates. This process involves determining income tax expense together with calculating the deferred income tax expense related to temporary differences resulting from the differing treatment of items for tax and accounting purposes, such as deferred revenue or deductibility of certain intangible assets which are recognized for the estimated future tax consequences attributable to differences between the consolidated financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases. Deferred tax assets are recognized for deductible temporary differences, along with net operating loss carry-forwards, if it is more likely than not that the tax benefits will be realized. To the extent a deferred tax asset cannot be recognized under the preceding criteria, a valuation allowance is established. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using tax rates currently in effect for the year in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. These temporary differences result in deferred tax assets and liabilities. To the extent a deferred tax asset cannot be recognized under the preceding criteria, a valuation allowance is established. Changes in these estimates may result in significant increases or decreases to the Company’s tax provision in a period in which such estimates are charged, which would affect net income.


ITEM 2.		MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with the (1) unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements and the related notes thereto included elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, and (2) the audited consolidated financial statements and notes thereto and management’s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations for the fiscal year ended April 30, 2009 included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, or the SEC, on July 9, 2009. This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. These statements are often identified by the use of words such as “may,” “will,” “expect,” “believe,” “anticipate,” “intend,” “could,” “estimate,” or “continue,” and similar expressions or variations. Such forward-looking statements are subject to risks, uncertainties and other factors that could cause actual results and the timing of certain events to differ materially from future results expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. Factors that could cause or contribute to such differences include, but are not limited to, those identified herein, and those discussed in the section titled “Risk Factors”, set forth in Part II, Item 1A of this Form 10-Q and in our other SEC filings, including our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended April 30, 2009. We disclaim any obligation to update any forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances after the date of such statements.

Overview

We are a leading provider of security and compliance management solutions that protect enterprises and government agencies. Our products help customers comply with corporate and regulatory policy, safeguard their assets and processes and control risk. Our platform collects and correlates user activity and event data across the enterprise so that businesses can rapidly identify, prioritize and respond to compliance violations, policy breaches, cybersecurity attacks and insider threats. Our products collect and correlate massive numbers of events from thousands of security point solutions, network and computing devices and applications, enabling intelligent identification, prioritization and response to compliance and corporate policy violations, and external and insider threats and compliance. We also provide complementary software that delivers pre-packaged analytics and reports tailored to specific security and compliance initiatives, as well as appliances that streamline event log collection, storage, analysis and reporting.

We were founded in May 2000 and first sold our initial ESM product in June 2002. We initially funded our operations primarily through convertible preferred stock financings that raised a total of $26.8 million. Our revenues have grown from $32.8 million in fiscal 2005 to $136.2 million in fiscal 2009, and were $34.6 million in our first quarter of fiscal 2010.

In February 2008, we completed our IPO, in which we sold 6,000,000 shares of common stock, at an issue price of $9.00 per share. We raised a total of $54.0 million in gross proceeds from our IPO, or $45.9 million in net proceeds after deducting underwriting discounts of $3.8 million and offering expenses of $4.3 million.

We achieved positive cash flows from operations in fiscal 2004 through 2009. We generated $9.0 million and $3.8 million in cash from our operating activities during the three months ended July 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively, and we generally expect to continue to generate positive cash flows from operating activities on an annual basis. As of July 31, 2009, we had cash and cash equivalents and accounts receivable of $124.6 million, and an aggregate of $17.2 million in accounts payable and accrued liabilities.

Important Factors Affecting Our Operating Results and Financial Condition

We believe that the market for our products is in the early stages of development. We have identified factors that we expect to play an important role in our future growth and profitability. These factors are:

Sales of ESM Products and Appliance Products to New Customers. The market for security and compliance management software solutions is growing, with new purchases often driven by corporate compliance initiatives. We typically engage in a proof of concept with our customers to demonstrate the capabilities of our ESM products in their specific environment. A new sale usually involves the sale of licenses for one or more ESM Managers, licenses for the number and type of devices the customer intends to manage with ArcSight ESM, licenses for our console and web interfaces, installation services, training and an initial maintenance arrangement. In many cases, customers will also purchase one of our complementary software modules which enable them to implement specific sets of off-the-shelf rules for our event correlation engine that address specific security and compliance issues and business risks. In addition, customers may purchase our ArcSight Logger appliances to address their log archiving needs. A key component of our

growth will depend on our ability to sell our products to new customers and our subsequent ability to generate follow-on sales from these customers. We also anticipate that a growing proportion of future new customers will be a result of initial sales of ArcSight Logger, our new ArcSight Express product and our other products sold in an appliance form factor.

Continued Sales to Our Installed Base. Many customers make an initial purchase from us and then decide whether to use our products with respect to a larger portion of their business and technology infrastructure or buy additional complementary products from us. Thus, a key component of our growth will be our ability to successfully maintain and further develop the relationships with our existing customers.

Development and Introduction of New Products. We believe it is important that we continue to develop or acquire new products and services that will help us capitalize on opportunities in the security and compliance management market. Examples of new product introductions in fiscal 2009 included our Compliance Insight Package for NERC CIP standards 002-009 and our ArcSight Express product. We continue the enhancement of our ESM products and solutions, such as the introduction of ESM appliances in June 2008, the integration with the Cisco Mobility Services Engine announced in May 2009, and the introduction of an all-in-one PCI log management appliance in July 2008 and ArcSight Logger 3.0 in September 2008. In addition, we continue to develop and release appliance versions of our software products and updates to complementary solution packages for our ArcSight Logger product.

Development of Our Channel Network. Historically, we have sold our products primarily through our direct sales force, with sales to government or international purchasers through resellers and systems integrators. We recently expanded our sales channel to assist us in penetrating the mid-market, particularly as we expanded our appliance-based offerings. We believe that our current and any new appliance-based products that we develop will be sold more effectively through resellers and, if we are successful in introducing these new products, we will become more dependent on the development of an effective channel network. Further training, certification and development of our existing channel partners will be a key factor in the success of this strategy.

Sources of Revenues, Cost of Revenues and Operating Expenses

Our sales transactions typically include the following elements: a software license fee paid for the use of our products in perpetuity or, in limited circumstances, for a specified term; an arrangement for first-year support and maintenance, which includes unspecified software updates and upgrades; and professional services for installation, implementation and training. We derive the majority of our revenues from sales of software products. We introduced complementary appliance products in fiscal 2007. We sell our products and services primarily through our direct sales force. Additionally, we utilize resellers and systems integrators, particularly in sales to government agencies and international customers.

We recognize revenues pursuant to American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, or AICPA, Statement of Position, or SOP, No. 97-2, Software Revenue Recognition, as amended by SOP No. 98-9, Software Revenue Recognition with Respect to Certain Arrangements, or collectively, SOP 97-2, which, if revenues are to be recognized upon product delivery, requires among other things vendor-specific objective evidence of fair value, or VSOE, for each undelivered element of multiple element customer contracts.

Revenues in fiscal 2007 and prior years were impacted by multiple element sales transactions consummated for which the revenues were deferred because we did not have vendor-specific objective evidence of fair value, or VSOE, for some product elements that were not delivered in the fiscal year of the transaction. Following identification in mid-fiscal 2007 of transactions with such undelivered elements, with respect to some of these transactions, we and our customers amended the contractual terms to remove the undelivered product elements and in other instances we have since delivered such product elements. The net impact of these transactions increased revenues in the three months ended July 31, 2009 and 2008, by $0.7 million and $0.2 million, respectively. As of July 31, 2009 and April 30, 2009, deferred revenues included $0.9 million and $1.6 million, respectively, related to transactions such as these.

In addition, if we determine that collectibility is not reasonably assured, we defer the revenues until collectibility becomes reasonably assured, generally upon receipt of cash. Deferred revenue and accounts receivable are reported net of adjustments for sales transactions invoiced during the period that are recognized as revenue in a future period once cash is received and all other revenue recognition criteria have been met, which are sometimes referred to as net-down adjustments. Accordingly, we believe that in order to understand the change in both deferred revenue and accounts receivable from one period to another the impact of these net-down adjustments should be considered.

Historically sales to the U.S. government have represented a significant portion of our revenues, while international sales have represented a smaller portion of our revenues. We expect revenues from sales to agencies of the U.S. government to continue to grow both in absolute dollars and as a percentage of revenues. In addition, we expect that sales to customers outside of the United States will continue to grow in absolute dollars.

Product Revenues

Product revenues consist of license fees for our software products and, beginning in fiscal 2007, also includes revenues for sales of our appliance products. License fees are based on a number of factors, including the type and number of devices that a customer intends to monitor using our software as well as the number of users and locations. In addition to our core solution, some of our customers purchase additional licenses for optional extension modules that provide enhanced discovery and analytics capabilities. Sales of our appliance products consist of sales of the appliance hardware and associated perpetual licenses to the embedded software. We introduced our first appliance products in June 2006 and our first ArcSight Logger product, our most widely adopted appliance product to date, in December 2006. Appliance fees are based on the number of appliances purchased and, in some cases, on the number of network devices with which our customer intends to use the appliances. We generally recognize product revenues at the time of product delivery, provided all other revenue recognition criteria have been met.

Historically, we have engaged in long sales cycles with our customers, typically three to six months and more than a year for some sales, and many customers make their purchase decisions in the last month of a fiscal quarter, following procurement trends in the industry. Further, average deal size can vary considerably depending on our customers’ configuration requirements, implementation plan and budget availability. As a result, it is difficult to predict timing or size of product sales on a quarterly basis. In addition, we may fail to forecast sufficient production of our appliance products due to our limited experience with them, or we may be unable to physically deliver appliances within the quarter, depending on the proximity of the order to the end of the quarter. These situations may lead to delay of revenues until we can deliver products. The loss or delay of one or more large sales transactions in a quarter could impact our operating results for that quarter and any future quarters into which revenues from that transaction are delayed.

In addition, we believe that our product revenue has been somewhat seasonal historically, with the first quarter ending July 31 of our fiscal year typically having relatively lower product revenue and the fourth quarter ending April 30 of our fiscal year typically having relatively higher product revenue. We believe that this seasonality results from a number of factors, including:

	•		the budgeting, procurement and work cycles of our customers, including customers in the public sector;

	•		the timing of our annual sales “club” for top performers and annual training for our entire sales force in our first fiscal quarter;

	•		seasonal reductions in business activity during the summer months in the United States, Europe and certain other regions;

	•		sales to customers with a standard December 31 fiscal year end that may positively impact our license revenue in the third quarter of our fiscal year; and

	•		the structure of our direct sales incentive and compensation program, which may reinforce the tendency of our direct sales team to book the largest volume of deals toward the end of our fiscal year.

The timing of our fiscal quarters and the U.S. federal government’s September 30 fiscal year end may impact product sales to governmental agencies in the second quarter of our fiscal year, offsetting the otherwise seasonal downturn in later summer months. We expect these seasonal factors to continue to impact our business in the future, and any seasonality that we experience may cause fluctuations in our operating results. We believe that our rapid historical growth may have overshadowed the nature or magnitude of seasonal or cyclical factors that might have influenced our business to date. They may do so again in the future. Seasonal or cyclical variations in our operations may become more pronounced over time and may materially adversely affect our results of operations in the future.

As of July 31, 2009 and April 30, 2009, deferred product revenues were $7.9 million and $9.8 million, respectively. Included in deferred product revenues as of July 31, 2009 and April 30, 2009 was $0.7 million and $1.3 million, respectively, related to multiple element arrangements where one or more product elements for which we did not have VSOE remained undelivered. The remainder of deferred product revenues as of July 31, 2009 and April 30, 2009 was $7.2 million and $8.5 million, respectively, and primarily related to product revenues to be recognized ratably over the term of the maintenance arrangements, prepayments in advance of

delivery and other delivery deferrals. Deferred revenue and accounts receivable are reported net of adjustments for sales transactions invoiced during the period that are recognized as revenue in a future period once cash is received and all other revenue recognition criteria have been met. These net-down adjustments decrease both accounts receivable and deferred revenue. Accordingly, we believe that in order to understand the change in both deferred revenue and accounts receivable from one period to another the impact of these net-down adjustments should be considered. As of July 31, 2009 and April 30, 2009, deferred product revenues of $7.9 million and $9.8 million, respectively, were reduced by net-down adjustments of $5.1 million and $5.4 million, respectively. Our operating results in any particular quarterly period in fiscal 2010 may be similarly impacted by the recognition of previously deferred revenue, where the associated costs were recorded in prior periods. See “Critical Accounting Policies, Significant Judgments and Estimates—Revenue Recognition” and Note 2 to our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (“Significant Accounting Policies—Revenue Recognition”) elsewhere in this report.

Maintenance Revenues

Maintenance includes rights to unspecified software product updates and upgrades, maintenance releases and patches released during the term of the support period, and internet and telephone access to maintenance personnel and content. Maintenance revenues are generated both from maintenance that we agree to provide in connection with initial sales of software and hardware products and from maintenance renewals. We generally sell maintenance on an annual basis. We offer two levels of maintenance–standard and premium. The premium level is for customers that require 24-hour coverage seven days a week. In most cases, we provide maintenance for sales made through channel partners. In addition, we sell an enhanced maintenance offering that provides frequent security content updates for our software. Maintenance fees are treated as deferred revenue at the time the maintenance agreement is initiated and recognized ratably over the term of the maintenance agreement. As our customer base expands, we expect maintenance revenues to continue to grow, as maintenance is sold to new customers and existing customers renew.

As of July 31, 2009, deferred maintenance revenues were $30.9 million, of which $26.5 million represented current deferred maintenance revenues. As of April 30, 2009, deferred maintenance revenues were $32.4 million, of which $26.7 million represented current deferred maintenance revenues. Deferred maintenance revenues relate to advanced payments for support contracts that are recognized ratably. Included in deferred maintenance revenues as of July 31, 2009 and April 30, 2009, were $0.1 million and $0.2 million, respectively, related to multiple element arrangements where one or more product elements for which we did not have VSOE remained undelivered. For the three months ended July 31, 2009, there was $0.1 million of revenues recorded related to multiple element arrangements. As of July 31, 2009 and April 30, 2009, the deferred maintenance revenues of $30.9 million and $32.4 million, respectively, were reduced by net-down adjustments of $2.9 million and $2.6 million, respectively. Net-down adjustments decrease both accounts receivable and deferred revenue and typically relate to billed but unpaid customer transactions for maintenance renewal support terms where services have not yet been provided, or where revenue from the customer is only recognized when cash has been paid and all other revenue recognition criteria have been met. See “Critical Accounting Policies, Significant Judgments and Estimates—Revenue Recognition” and Note 2 to our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (“Significant Accounting Policies—Revenue Recognition”) elsewhere in this report.

Services Revenues

Services revenues are generated from sales of services to our customers, including installation and implementation of our software, consulting and training. Professional services are not essential to the functionality of the associated software products. During fiscal 2009, we entered into an increasing number of service engagements to staff and manage the security operation centers, SOCs, of certain large customers. These SOC engagements are typically longer in duration than other services engagements and support the day-to-day monitoring of customer SOC environments. We generally sell our services on a time-and-materials basis and recognize revenues as the services are performed. Services revenues have generally increased over time as we have sold and delivered installation and training services to our new customers and continued to sell training and consulting services to our existing customers, including our new SOC services.

As of July 31, 2009 and April 30, 2009, deferred service revenues were $3.0 million and $2.9 million, respectively, in each case all of which represented current deferred services revenues. Deferred services revenues relate to customer payments in advance of services being performed. As of July 31, 2009 and April 30, 2009, the deferred service revenues of $3.0 million and $2.9 million, respectively were reduced by net-down adjustments of $0.6 million and $1.0 million, respectively. Net-down adjustments decrease both accounts receivable and deferred revenue and typically relate to billed but unpaid customer transactions for service engagements where services have not yet been provided, or where revenue from the customer is only recognized when cash has been paid and all other revenue recognition criteria have been met. See “Critical Accounting Policies, Significant Judgments and Estimates—Revenue

Recognition” and Note 2 to our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (“Significant Accounting Policies—Revenue Recognition”) elsewhere in this report.

Cost of Revenues

Cost of revenues for our software products consists of third-party royalties and license fees for licensed technology incorporated into our software product offerings. Cost of revenues for appliance products consists of the hardware costs of the appliances and third-party royalties for licensed technology. The cost of product revenues is primarily impacted by the mix of software and appliance products as well as the relative ratio of third-party royalty bearing products included in software sales transactions. Sales of our appliance products are generally at a lower gross margin than sales of our software products.

Cost of maintenance revenues consists primarily of salaries and benefits related to maintenance personnel, royalties and other out-of-pocket expenses, and facilities and other related overhead.

Cost of services revenues consists primarily of the salaries and benefits of personnel, travel and other out-of-pocket expenses, facilities and other related overhead that are allocated based on the portion of the efforts of such personnel that are related to performance of professional services, and cost of services provided by subcontractors for professional services. Services gross margin may fluctuate as a result of periodic changes in our use of third party service providers, resulting in lower or higher gross margins for these services.

We intend to increase sales to the mid-market, a goal that we believe will be aided by our recent introduction of additional appliance products. We expect the percentage of our mid-market sales made through our distribution channel will be greater than it has been to date. We also expect a high percentage of our international sales to continue to be made through our distribution channel. Sales through the channel tend to be at a lower gross margin than direct sales. As a result, we may report lower gross margins in future periods than has been the case for prior periods.

Operating and Non-Operating Expenses

Research and Development Expenses. Research and development expenses consist primarily of salaries and benefits of personnel engaged in the development of new products, the enhancement of existing products, quality assurance activities and, to a lesser extent, facilities costs and other related overhead. We expense all of our research and development costs as they are incurred. We expect research and development expenses to increase in absolute dollars for the foreseeable future as we continue to invest in the development of our products.

Sales and Marketing Expenses. Sales and marketing expenses consist primarily of salaries, commissions and benefits related to sales and marketing personnel and consultants; travel and other out-of-pocket expenses; expenses for marketing programs, such as for trade shows and our annual users conference, marketing materials and corporate communications; and facilities costs and other related overhead. Commissions on sales of products and maintenance are typically accrued and expensed when the respective revenue elements are ordered. Commissions on sales of services are typically accrued and expensed when the services are ordered. We also pay commissions for channel sales not only to our channel sales force but also to our direct sales force in an effort to minimize channel conflicts as we develop our channel network. We intend to hire additional sales personnel, initiate additional marketing programs and build additional relationships with resellers and systems integrators on a global basis. Accordingly, we expect that our sales and marketing expenses will continue to increase for the foreseeable future in absolute dollars.

General and Administrative Expenses. General and administrative expenses consist primarily of salaries and benefits related to general and administrative personnel and consultants; accounting and legal fees; insurance costs and facilities costs and other related overhead. We expect that, in the future, general and administrative expenses will increase in absolute dollars as we add personnel and incur additional costs related to the growth of our business and additional legal, accounting and other expenses in connection with our reporting and compliance obligations as a public company.

Other Income (Expense), Net. Other income (expense), net consists of interest earned on our cash investments and foreign currency-related gains and losses. Our interest income will vary each reporting period depending on our average cash balances during the period and the current level of interest rates. Our foreign currency-related gains and losses will also vary depending upon movements in underlying exchange rates.

Accounting for Income Taxes. Our provision for income taxes is calculated in compliance with SFAS No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes, or SFAS 109, and other related guidance, and generally consists of tax expense related to current period earnings. We estimate income taxes in each of the jurisdictions in which we operate. This process involves determining income tax expense together with calculating the deferred income tax expense related to temporary differences resulting from the differing treatment of items for tax and accounting purposes. Deferred tax assets are recognized for deductible temporary differences, along with net operating loss carry-forwards, if it is more likely than not that the tax benefits will be realized. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates in effect for the year in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. These temporary differences result in deferred tax assets and liabilities, which are included within the consolidated balance sheets.

To the extent a deferred tax asset cannot be recognized a valuation allowance is established to reduce our deferred tax assets to the amount that is more likely than not to be realized. A valuation allowance is maintained until sufficient evidence exists to support the reversal of all or some portion of these allowances. Should the actual amounts differ from our estimates, the amount of our valuation allowance could be materially impacted.

We have previously experienced a greater than 50% shift in our stock ownership, which creates annual limitations on our ability to use a portion of our net operating loss carry-forwards. As a result, our provision for income taxes and our resulting effective tax rate may be greater than if our net operating loss carry-forwards were available without limitation.

Critical Accounting Policies, Significant Judgments and Estimates

Our condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States, which requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements as well as the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. We base our estimates and judgments on our historical experience, knowledge of current conditions and our beliefs regarding likely occurrences in the future, given available information. Estimates are used for, but are not limited to, revenue recognition, determination of fair value of stock and stock-based awards, valuation of goodwill and intangible assets acquired in business combinations, impairment of goodwill and other intangible assets, amortization of intangible assets, accounting for income taxes, accounting for uncertainties in income taxes, contingencies and litigation, allowances for doubtful accounts, and accrued liabilities. Actual results may differ from those estimates, and any differences may be material to our financial statements. Further, if we apply different factors, or change the method by which we apply the various factors that are used, in making our critical estimates and judgments, our reported operating results and financial condition could be materially affected.

Revenue Recognition

We recognize revenues in accordance with SOP 97-2. Accordingly, we exercise judgment and use estimates in connection with the determination of the amount of product, maintenance and services revenues to be recognized in each accounting period.

We derive revenues primarily from three sources: (i) sales of our software and hardware products, (ii) fees for maintenance to provide unspecified upgrades and customer technical support, and (iii) fees for services, including professional services for product installation, implementation, staffing and management services for SOCs and training. Our appliance products contain software that is more than incidental to the functionality of the product. In accordance with SOP 97-2, we recognize revenues when the following conditions have been met:

	•		persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists;

	•		the fee is fixed or determinable;

	•		product delivery has occurred or services have been rendered; and

	•		collection is considered probable.

We typically use a binding purchase order in conjunction with either a signed contract or reference on the purchase order to the terms and conditions of our shrinkwrap or end-user license agreement as evidence of an arrangement. We assess whether the fee is fixed or determinable based on the payment terms associated with the transaction and whether the sales price is subject to refund or forfeiture, concession or other adjustment. We do not generally grant rights of return or price protection to our distribution partners or end users, other than limited rights of return during the warranty period in some cases. We use shipping documents, contractual terms and conditions and customer acceptance, when applicable, to verify product delivery to the customer. For perpetual software license fees in arrangements that do not include customization, or services that are not considered essential to the functionality of the licenses, delivery is deemed to occur when the product is delivered to the customer. Services and consulting arrangements that are not essential

to the functionality of the licensed product are recognized as revenues as these services are provided. Delivery of maintenance is considered to occur on a straight-line basis ratably over the life of the contract. We consider probability of collection based on a number of factors, such as creditworthiness of the customer as determined by credit checks and analysis, past transaction history, the geographic location and financial viability. We do not require, nor do we request, collateral from customers. If we determine that collectibility is not reasonably assured, we defer the revenues until collectibility becomes reasonably assured, generally upon receipt of cash. A net-down adjustment may be recorded in cases where sales transactions have been invoiced but are recognized on cash receipt, for invoiced but unpaid sales transactions related to post-contract customer support obligations for which the term has not commenced, or for invoiced but unpaid service engagements where services have not yet been provided. Net-down adjustments decrease both accounts receivable and deferred revenue. Any such transactions included in accounts receivable and deferred revenue at period end are reflected on the balance sheet on a net basis.

Our sales of software products to date have typically been multiple element arrangements, which have included software licenses and corresponding maintenance, and have also generally included some amount of professional services. Our sales of appliance products to date have been multiple element arrangements as well, which included hardware, software licenses and corresponding maintenance, and have also generally included some amount of professional services. We allocate the total arrangement fee among these multiple elements based upon their respective fair values as determined by VSOE or, if applicable, by the residual method under SOP 97-2. VSOE for maintenance and support services is based on separate sales and/or renewals to other customers or upon renewal rates quoted in contracts when the quoted renewal rates are deemed substantive in both rate and term. VSOE for professional services is established based on prices charged to customers when those services are sold separately. If we cannot objectively determine the fair value of any undelivered element in a multiple element arrangement, we defer revenues for each element until all elements have been delivered, or until VSOE can objectively be determined for any remaining undelivered element. If VSOE for maintenance does not exist, and this represents the only undelivered element, then revenues for the entire arrangement are recognized ratably over the performance period. When VSOE of a delivered element has not been determined, but the fair value for all undelivered elements has, we use the residual method to record revenues for the delivered element. Under the residual method, the fair value of the undelivered elements is deferred and the remaining portion of the arrangement fee is allocated to the delivered element and recognized immediately as revenues. Revenues from time-based (term) license sales that include ongoing delivery obligations throughout the term of the arrangement are recognized ratably over the term.

Our agreements generally do not include acceptance provisions. However, if acceptance provisions exist, we deem delivery to have occurred upon customer acceptance.

For sales to direct end-users and channel partners, we recognize product revenue once either we or our channel partner has a contractual agreement in place and upon transfer of title and risk of loss, which is generally upon shipment, provided all other criteria for revenue recognition have been met. Where sales are made through resellers, revenue is generally recorded upon shipment to the end-users, when all other criteria for revenue recognition have been met. In a limited number of instances, when delivery is to be made to a reseller upon the request of either the end-user or the reseller, and when all other criteria for revenue recognition have been met, it is our practice to recognize revenue on shipment to a reseller but only where an end-user has been identified prior to shipment. For end-users, resellers and systems integrators, we generally have no significant obligations for future performance such as rights of return or pricing credits.

We assess whether fees are collectible and fixed or determinable at the time of the sale, and recognize revenues if all other revenue recognition criteria have been met. Our standard payment terms are net 30 days and are considered normal up to net three months, while payment terms beyond three months are considered to be extended terms. Payments that are due within three months are generally deemed to be fixed or determinable based on our successful collection history on these agreements.

Stock-Based Compensation

Effective May 1, 2006, we adopted SFAS 123R, which requires companies to expense the fair value of employee stock options and other forms of stock-based compensation. SFAS 123R requires nonpublic companies that used the minimum value method under SFAS No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation, or SFAS 123, for either recognition or pro forma disclosures to apply SFAS 123R using the prospective-transition method. As such, we continued to apply APB 25 in future periods to unvested equity awards outstanding at the date of adoption of SFAS 123R that were measured using the minimum value method. In addition, we continued to amortize those awards granted prior to May 1, 2006 utilizing an accelerated amortization schedule. As of April 30, 2009, amortization under the APB 25 minimum value method was complete. In accordance with SFAS 123R, we will recognize the compensation cost of employee stock-based awards granted subsequent to April 30, 2006 in the statement of operations using the straight-line method over the vesting period of the award.

To determine the fair value of stock options granted after May 1, 2006, we have elected to use the Black-Scholes option pricing model, which requires, among other inputs, an estimate of the fair value of the underlying common stock on the date of grant and assumptions as to volatility of our stock over the expected term of the related options, the expected term of the options, the risk-free interest rate and the option forfeiture rate. As there had been no public market for our common stock prior to our IPO in February 2008, we determined the volatility for options granted for fiscal 2008 and fiscal 2007 based on an analysis of reported data for a peer group of companies that issued options with substantially similar terms. The expected volatility of options granted has been determined using weighted-average measures of the peer group of companies of the implied volatility and the historical volatility for a period equal to the expected life of the option, and our historical volatility. The weighted-average expected volatility for options granted for the three months ended July 31, 2009 and 2008 was 58% and 53%, respectively. The expected life of options has been determined considering the expected life of options granted by a group of peer companies and the average vesting and contractual terms of options granted to our employees. The weighted-average expected life of options granted for the three months ended July 31, 2009 and 2008 was 5.66 years and 5.74 years, respectively. For the three months ended July 31, 2009 and 2008, the weighted-average risk-free interest rate used was 2.26% and 3.17%, respectively. The risk-free interest rate is based on a zero coupon United States treasury instrument whose term is consistent with the expected life of the stock options. We have not paid and do not anticipate paying cash dividends on our shares of common stock; therefore, the expected dividend yield is assumed to be zero. In addition, SFAS 123R requires companies to utilize an estimated forfeiture rate when calculating the expense for the period, whereas SFAS 123 permitted companies to record forfeitures based on actual forfeitures, which was our historical policy under SFAS 123. As a result, we applied an estimated annual forfeiture rate of 5% for the three months ended July 31, 2009 and 2008, in determining the expense recorded in our consolidated statement of operations.

We recorded expense of $1.7 million and $1.1 million for the three months ended July 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively, in connection with stock-based awards accounted for under SFAS 123R. As of July 31, 2009, unrecognized stock-based compensation expense of non-vested stock options was $19.6 million, which is expected to be recognized using the straight line method over the required service period of the options. We expect stock-based compensation expense to increase in absolute dollars as a result of the adoption of SFAS 123R. The actual amount of stock-based compensation expense we record in any fiscal period will depend on a number of factors, including the number of stock options issued and the volatility of our stock price over time. In future periods, stock-based compensation expense may increase as we issue additional equity-based awards to continue to attract and retain key employees. Additionally, SFAS 123R requires that we recognize compensation expense only for the portion of stock options that are expected to vest. If the actual number of forfeitures differs from that estimated by management, we will be required to record adjustments to stock-based compensation expense in future periods.

Our 2007 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, or ESPP, became effective upon the effectiveness of our IPO on February 14, 2008. The ESPP provides for consecutive six-month offering periods, except for the first offering period, which commenced on February 14, 2008 and ended on September 15, 2008. The ESPP is compensatory and results in compensation cost accounted for under SFAS 123R. We use the Black-Scholes option pricing model to estimate the fair value of rights to acquire stock granted under the ESPP. For the three months ended July 31, 2009 and 2008, we recorded stock-based compensation expense associated with the ESPP of $0.2 million and $0.3 million, respectively. As of July 31, 2009, unrecognized stock-based compensation expense associated with rights to acquire shares of common stock under the ESPP was $0.1 million.

Goodwill and Intangible Assets

In accordance with SFAS No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets, or SFAS 142, we do not amortize goodwill or other intangible assets with indefinite lives but rather test them for impairment. SFAS 142 requires us to perform an impairment review of our goodwill balance at least annually, which we intend to perform on November 1 of each fiscal year, and also whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of these assets may not be recoverable. The allocation of the acquisition cost to intangible assets and goodwill requires the extensive use of estimates and assumptions, including estimates of future cash flows expected to be generated by the acquired assets and amortization of intangible assets, other than goodwill. Further, when impairment indicators are identified with respect to previously recorded intangible assets, the values of the assets are determined using discounted future cash flow techniques. Significant management judgment is required in the forecasting of future operating results that are used in the preparation of the projected discounted cash flows, and should different conditions prevail, material write-downs of net intangible assets could occur. We review periodically the estimated remaining useful lives of our acquired intangible assets. A reduction in our estimate of remaining useful lives, if any, could result in increased amortization expense in future periods. Future goodwill impairment tests could result in a charge to earnings.

Allowance for Doubtful Accounts

We maintain an allowance for doubtful accounts based on a periodic review of customer accounts, payment patterns and specific collection issues. Where account-specific collection issues are identified, we record a specific allowance based on the amount that we believe will not be collected. For accounts where specific collection issues are not identified, we record a reserve based on the age of the receivables. As of July 31, 2009, we had an allowance for doubtful accounts balance of $0.3 million. As of July 31, 2009, we had one customer that accounted for 13%, of our net accounts receivable.

Accounting for Income Taxes

Management judgment is required in determining our provision for income taxes, our deferred tax assets and liabilities and any valuation allowance recorded against our net deferred tax assets.

Provision for (benefit from) income taxes is calculated in accordance with SFAS No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes, or SFAS 109, APB No. 28, Interim Financial Reporting, or APB 28, and FASB Interpretation No. 18, Accounting for Income Taxes in the Interim Period, or FIN 18 as amended by SFAS 109. Significant components affecting the tax rate for fiscal 2009 include the utilization of net operating losses, research and development credits, foreign tax credits, the composite state tax rate, and non-deductible stock-based compensation expense.

We maintained a full valuation allowance as of July 31, 2009 because, based on the available evidence, we assessed that it was more likely than not that we would not be able to utilize all of our deferred tax assets in the future. We intend to maintain the full valuation allowances until sufficient evidence exists to support the reversal of all or some portion of these allowances. Should the actual amounts differ from our estimates, the amount of our valuation allowance could be materially impacted.

We have previously experienced a greater than 50% shift in our stock ownership, which creates annual limitations on our ability to use a portion of our net operating loss carry-forwards.

We adopted FASB Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes, an Interpretation of SFAS 109, or FIN 48, on May 1, 2007. FIN 48 prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement attributes for the financial statement recognition and measurement of uncertain tax positions taken or expected to be taken in a company’s income tax return. FIN 48 also provides guidance on derecognition, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure and transition with respect to income tax uncertainty. Management judgment is required to determine if the weight of available evidence indicates that a tax position is more likely than not to be sustained, as well as the largest amount of benefit from each sustained position that is more likely than not to be realized.

We file income tax returns in the U.S. federal jurisdiction, California and various state and foreign tax jurisdictions in which we have a subsidiary or branch operation. The tax years 2002 to 2009 remain open to examination by the U.S. federal and state tax authorities, and the tax years 2005 and 2009 remain open to examination by the foreign tax authorities.

Results of Operations

The following table presents our results of operations as a percentage of total revenues for the periods indicated:


	Three Months Ended July 31,
	2009			2008
Revenues:
Products		52.9	%		57.1	%
Maintenance		34.5			31.0
Services		12.6			11.9

Total revenues		100.0			100.0
Cost of revenues:
Products		5.6			6.0
Maintenance		5.6			5.9
Services		7.6			7.4

Total cost of revenues		18.8			19.3

Gross margin		81.2			80.7
Operating expenses:
Research and development		16.2			19.2
Sales and marketing		42.8			53.7
General and administrative		17.4			15.7

Total operating expenses		76.4			88.6

Income (loss) from operations		4.8	%		(7.9	)%

Comparison of the Three Months Ended July 31, 2009 and 2008

Revenues

Revenues for the three-months ended July 31, 2009 and 2008 was as follows (in thousands, except percentages):


	Three Months Ended July 31,
	2009			2008			Change in Dollars		Change in Percent
Products	$	18,265		$	15,802		$	2,463		15.6	%
Percentage of total revenues		52.9	%		57.1	%
Maintenance		11,919			8,568			3,351		39.1	%
Percentage of total revenues		34.5	%		31.0	%
Services		4,371			3,293			1,078		32.7	%
Percentage of total revenues		12.6	%		11.9	%

Total revenues	$	34,555		$	27,663		$	6,892		24.9	%

Product Revenues. Product revenues for the three months ended July 31, 2009 included revenues of $7.5 million from 35 new customers and revenues of $10.8 million from existing customers. New customer revenues from 35 customers for the three months ended July 31, 2009 decreased by $0.4 million compared to new customer revenues from 47 customers for the three months ended July 31, 2008. The significant decrease in the number of new customers from the first quarter of fiscal 2009 to the first quarter of fiscal 2010 was primarily a result of a reduction of new customer additions in Asia Pacific. Given the relatively low average sales price in Asia Pacific the reduction in customer count did not have a significant impact on the amount of revenue from new customers. In addition, revenue from new customers was favorably impacted by one large new customer in the Americas. Existing customer revenues for the three months ended July 31, 2009 increased by $2.9 million compared to existing customer revenues for the three months ended July 31, 2008. The increase was primarily attributable to an increase in the average transaction size for sales to our existing customers in the Americas driven by additional purchases of our ESM product together with our logger product as well as the expansion of the deployment of our products more broadly across their IT infrastructure. We anticipate that the mix of product revenues from new and existing customers could fluctuate from period to period as a result of the transaction size, product mix, impact

of the poor economic environment and related geography of each revenue transaction. There was a net recognition of $0.6 million and $0.2 million of product revenues in the three months ended July 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively, related to historical sales transactions that initially included an undelivered product element for which we did not have VSOE. As of July 31, 2009, deferred product revenues included $0.7 million related to similar transactions. See the related discussion in “—Sources of Revenues, Cost of Revenues and Operating Expenses.”

Maintenance Revenues. Maintenance revenues increased $3.4 million for the three months ended July 31, 2009 compared to July 31, 2008, as a result of providing support services to a larger installed base as well as the incremental maintenance revenues from increased product sales. As a result of the timing of revenue recognition for sales transactions that included an undelivered product element for which we did not have VSOE, there was a net recognition of $0.1 million of maintenance revenues in the three months ended July 31, 2009 and no recognition of such maintenance revenues in the three months ended July 31, 2008.

Services Revenues. Services revenues increased by $1.0 million for the three months ended July 31, 2009 compared to July 31, 2008, primarily due to SOC staffing and management engagements, in addition to increased consulting and education service billings related to a larger installed base of customers.

Geographic Regions. We sell our product in three geographic regions: Americas; Europe Middle East and Africa, or EMEA; and Asia Pacific. Revenues, which include product, maintenance and service revenues in absolute amounts and as a percentage of total revenues for each region are summarized in the following table (in thousands, except percentages):


	Three Months Ended July 31,
	2009			2008			Change in Dollars			Change in Percent
Americas	$	28,722		$	21,362		$	7,360			34.5	%
Percentage of total revenue		83.1	%		77.2	%
EMEA		4,771			4,516			255			5.6	%
Percentage of total revenue		13.8	%		16.3	%
Asia Pacific		1,062			1,785			(723	)		(40.5	%)
Percentage of total revenue		3.1	%		6.5	%

Total revenue	$	34,555		$	27,663		$	6,832			24.9	%

Total revenues for three months ended July 31, 2009 as compared to July 31, 2008 increased due to the strength of the Americas region. The Americas region during the three months ended July 31, 2009 increased in both absolute dollars and as a percentage of revenues. We experienced an increase in revenues of the EMEA region in absolute dollars, but a decrease in percentage of total revenues year over year. This decrease continues to be driven by lack of IT spending in this region due to the weak economic environment, though there appear to be regional pockets of stabilization indicating signs of recovery. The Asia Pacific region’s revenue fell during the three months ended July 31, 2009 as compared to the three months ended July 31, 2008. This absolute dollar and percentage decrease was caused by significantly fewer new customers caused by a weak economy in the region. We expect the rate of growth of revenues from the EMEA and Asia Pacific regions to continue to trail growth in the Americas in the near term as a result of the varying impact that the recent and continuing deterioration in global economic and financial market conditions are having on capital spending and the differences in compliance mandates in these regions.

Cost of Revenues and Gross Margin

The following table is a summary of cost of product, maintenance, and services revenues in absolute amounts (in thousands, except percentages):


	Three Months Ended July 31,
	2009		2008		Change in Dollars		Change in Percent
Products	$	1,944	$	1,655	$	289		17.5	%
Maintenance		1,925		1,631		294		18.0	%
Services		2,630		2,043		587		28.7	%

Total cost of revenues	$	6,499	$	5,329	$	1,170		22.0	%

The following table is a summary of gross profit for products, maintenance, and services and their respective gross margins (in thousands, except percentages):


	Three Months Ended
	July 31,
	2009			2008
Gross margin
Products	$	16,321		$	14,147
Percentage of product revenues		89.4	%		89.5	%
Maintenance		9,994			6,937
Percentage of maintenance revenues		83.8	%		81.0	%
Services		1,741			1,250
Percentage of services revenues		39.8	%		38.0	%

Total gross margin	$	28,056		$	22,334
Percentage of total revenues		81.2	%		80.7	%

Cost of Product Revenues and Gross Margin. Cost of product revenues increased by $0.3 million for the three months ended July 31, 2009, primarily due to increased ArcSight Logger appliance cost of goods of $0.2 million related to increased ArcSight Logger appliance sales, as well as a minor increase related to royalty obligations associated with product cost of goods sold. Product gross margin as a percentage of product revenues remained relatively constant from period to period.

Cost of Maintenance Revenues and Gross Margin. Cost of maintenance revenues increased by $0.3 million for the three months ended July 31, 2009 compared to July 31, 2008, due to increased compensation-related expenses of $0.1 million related to increased head count and cost per employee and increases in third-party royalty support and maintenance expenses of $0.1 million. Maintenance gross margin increased by 2.8% as a percentage of maintenance revenues for the three months ended July 31, 2009 compared to July 31, 2008, due primarily to our installed base growing more quickly than corresponding growth in our support organization and associated costs.

Cost of Services Revenues and Gross Margin. Cost of services revenues increased by $0.6 million for the three months ended July 31, 2009 compared to July 31, 2008 due to increased compensation-related expenses of $0.2 million related to increased head count and cost per employee. Additionally, use of third party contractors increased by $0.4 million. Services gross margin as a percentage of services revenues increased by 1.8% to 39.8% for the three months ended July 31, 2009 from 38.0% for the three months ended July 31, 2008, due primarily to an increase in number of consulting service engagements and enhanced productivity improving underlying margins.

Operating Expenses

The following table is a summary of research and development, sales and marketing, and general and administrative expenses in absolute amounts and as a percentage of total revenues (in thousands, except percentages):


	Three Months Ended July 31,
	2009			2008			Change in Dollars			Change in Percent
Research and development	$	5,598		$	5,315		$	283			5.3	%
Percentage of total revenues		16.2	%		19.2	%
Sales and Marketing		14,785			14,868			(83	)		(0.6	%)
Percentage of total revenues		42.8	%		53.8	%
General and administrative		6,018			4,349			1,669			38.4	%
Percentage of total revenues		17.4	%		15.7	%

Total operating expenses	$	26,401		$	24,532		$	1,869			7.6	%
Percentage of total revenues		76.4	%		88.7	%

Research and Development Expenses. The increase in research and development expenses for the three months ended July 31, 2009 of $0.3 million compared to the three months ended July 31, 2008 was primarily attributable to an increase of $0.2 million in

compensation and an increase of $0.1 million in stock-based compensation expense, associated with an increase in research and development personnel from 105 to 115 at the respective period ends. In the first quarter of fiscal 2010, we added 6 new employees, and plan to continue hiring to extend our product platform. As a result, we expect research and development expenses to continue to increase in absolute dollars.

Sales and Marketing Expenses. The decrease in sales and marketing expenses for the three months ended July 31, 2009 of $0.1 million compared to the three months ended July 31, 2008, was primarily attributable to a decrease of $0.6 million in commission plan expenses associated with a change in commission plan structures. This decrease was offset by increased compensation-related expenses of $0.4 million due to an increase in sales and marketing personnel from 135 to 158 at the respective period ends, most notably in our business development and channel sales organizations. The compensation expense increase was offset by a key employee transitioning between our sales and marketing and general and administrative organizations during the second quarter of fiscal 2009. In the first quarter of fiscal 2010 we added 17 new employees, and plan to continue hiring in line with our growth opportunities. As a result, we expect sales and marketing expenses to continue to increase in absolute dollars.

General and Administrative Expenses. The increase in general and administrative expenses of $1.7 million for the three months ended July 31, 2009, compared to the three months ended July 31, 2008, was primarily associated with an increase of $0.5 million of stock based compensation cost related to the transition of a key employee from our sales and marketing organization, and $0.6 million in compensation related-expenses attributed to an increase in general administrative personnel from 46 to 57 at the respective period ends, as well as an increase in external consultants. Legal expenses increased by $0.5 million related to one time period expense associated with a potential small technology asset purchase which we decided not to pursue and activity related to ordinary course litigation, which has since settled. In addition, outside consulting expenses increased by $0.1 million, and general facility related expenses increased by $0.2 million, offset by a decrease of $0.3 million in audit, tax and related advisory expenses. We expect general and administrative expenses to marginally decrease in absolute dollars in our second quarter of fiscal 2010.

Non-Operating Expenses

The following table is a summary of interest income and other expenses, net (in thousands, except percentages):


	Three Months Ended
	July 31,						Change in Dollars			Change in Percent
	2009			2008
Interest income	$	28		$	404		$	(376	)		(93.1	)%
Percentage of total revenues		0.1	%		1.5	%
Other income (expense), net		(117	)		(99	)		(18	)		(18.2	)%
Percentage of total revenues		(0.4	)%		(0.4	)%
Provision for (benefit from) income taxes		551			(563	)		(1,114	)		(197.9	)%
Percentage of total revenues		1.6	%		(2.0	)%

Total non-operating income (expense)	$	(640	)	$	868		$	(1,508	)		(173.7	)%
Percentage of total revenues		(1.9	)%		3.1	%

Interest Income. The decrease in interest income of $0.4 million for the three months ended July 31, 2009 compared to July 31, 2008 was primarily attributable to lower interest rates during the first quarter of fiscal 2010.

Other Income (Expense), Net. Other income (expense), net for the three months ended July 31, 2009 compared to July 31, 2008 increased slightly as a result of entering into new capitalized software license arrangements.

Provision for (Benefit from) Income Taxes. For the three months ended July 31, 2009, we recorded a provision for income taxes of $0.6 million. The effective tax rate for the three months ended July 31, 2009 is 35.4% and is based on our estimated taxable income for the year, plus certain discrete items recorded during the quarter. The difference between the provision for income taxes that would be derived by applying the statutory rate to our income before tax and the income tax provision actually recorded is primarily due to the impact of non-deductible SFAS 123R stock-based compensation expenses, offset by the use of net operating loss carry-forwards and tax credits. For the three months ended July 31, 2008, we recorded a benefit for income taxes of ($0.6) million. The effective tax rate for the three months ended July 31, 2008 was 29.7%, and was based on our estimated taxable income for the year, plus certain discrete items recorded during the quarter. The difference between the provision for (benefit from) income taxes that would be

derived by applying the statutory rate to our income before tax and the income tax provision actually recorded was primarily due to the impact of nondeductible SFAS 123R stock-based compensation expenses, which was offset by tax credits.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

From our inception in May 2000 through October 2002, we funded our operations primarily through convertible preferred stock financings that raised a total of $26.8 million. We achieved positive cash flows from operations in fiscal 2004 through 2009, and generated $9.0 million of cash from our operating activities during the three months ended July 31, 2009 compared to $3.8 million of cash from our operating activities for the three months ended July 31, 2008. We generally expect to continue generating positive operating cash flows on an annual basis. There may be individual quarters in which we use cash as a result of the timing of receipts or payments such as receipt of a large receivable from a customer whose revenue is recognized on a cash basis or payment of annual bonuses in the first quarter of a fiscal year. Additionally in February 2008, we completed our IPO in which we sold 6,000,000 shares of common stock at an issue price of $9.00 per share. We raised a total of $54.0 million in gross proceeds from our IPO, or $45.9 million in net proceeds after deducting underwriting discounts and offering expenses.

At July 31, 2009, we had cash and cash equivalents totaling $101.5 million and accounts receivable of $23.1 million, compared to $90.5 million of cash and cash equivalents and $34.2 million of accounts receivable at April 30, 2009.

Historically our principal uses of cash have consisted of payroll and other operating expenses and purchases of property and equipment to support our growth. In fiscal 2007, we used $7.2 million in cash to purchase the assets of Enira Technologies, LLC and pay acquisition costs.

The following table shows our cash flows from operating activities, investing activities and financing activities for the stated periods:


	Three Months Ended
	July 31,
	2009			2008
Net cash provided by operating activities	$	8,990		$	3,788
Net cash used in investing activities		(1,339	)		(1,216	)
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities		3,216			(346	)

Operating Activities

We have reported net income for the three months ended July 31, 2009, and although we reported a net loss for the three months ended July 31, 2008 our operating activities have provided positive cash flows, primarily due to the significant non-cash charges associated with stock-based compensation and depreciation and amortization reflected in operating expenses and cash received from collections from customers. Our cash flows from operating activities in any period will continue to be significantly influenced by our results of operations, these non-cash charges and changes in deferred revenues, as well as changes in other components of our working capital.

While we may report negative cash flows from operating activities from time to time in particular quarterly periods, we generally expect to continue to generate positive cash flows from operating activities on an annual basis. Future cash from operations will depend on many factors, including:

	•		the growth in our sales transactions and associated cash collections or growth in receivables;

	•		the level of our sales and marketing activities, including expansion into new territories;

	•		the timing and extent of spending to support product development efforts; and

	•		the timing of the growth in general and administrative expenses as we further develop our administrative infrastructure to support the business as a public company.

We generated $9.0 million of cash from operating activities during the three months ended July 31, 2009, primarily as a result of a $11.0 million decrease in accounts receivable due to strong collections efforts associated with our relatively high accounts receivable

balance as of April 30, 2009, an increase of $2.2 million in accounts payable due to the timing of payments, an increase in other accrued liabilities of $0.2 million, and a decrease of $0.3 million in prepaid expenses and other assets, offset by a decrease of $5.2 million in accrued compensation and benefits related to payments of sales commission and performance bonuses earned during fiscal 2009, and a reduction in deferred revenue of $3.2 million. In addition, we had a net income of $1.0 million for this period, which included non-cash charges of $1.9 million for stock-based compensation expense and $0.8 million of depreciation and amortization.

We generated $3.8 million of cash from operating activities during the three months ended July 31, 2008, primarily as a result of a $9.3 million decrease in accounts receivable due to strong collections efforts associated with our relatively high accounts receivable balance as of April 30, 2008, and an increase of $1.0 million in other accrued liabilities, offset by a decrease in accrued compensation and benefits of $6.3 million related to payments of sales commission and performance bonuses earned in fiscal 2008, and decrease in accounts payable of $0.6 million and deduction in deferred revenue of $0.5 million. In addition, we had a net loss of $1.3 million for this period, which included non-cash charges of $1.4 million for stock-based compensation expense and $0.8 million of depreciation and amortization.

Investing Activities

During the three months ended July 31, 2009, we used $1.3 million in cash for investing activities, comprised primarily of capital expenditures associated with software acquired in support of our enterprise resource planning (ERP) software implementation. During the three months ended July 31, 2008, we used $1.2 million in cash for investing activities, of which $1.1 million was related to capital expenditures associated with computer equipment in support of the expansion of our infrastructure and work force.

Financing Activities

During the three months ended July 31, 2009, $3.2 million of cash was provided by financing activities, comprised primarily of $3.7 million of net proceeds from the exercise of stock options, and $0.2 million from tax benefits related to disqualifying dispositions associated with stock-based compensation, offset by $0.6 million in payments for prepaid software licenses used as a component in our product sales. During the three months ended July 31, 2008, we used $0.3 million of cash from financing activities, comprised primarily of $0.5 million in payments for prepaid software licenses used as a component in our product sales, offset by $0.2 million from net proceeds from the exercise of stock options.

Other Factors Affecting Liquidity and Capital Resources

We believe that our cash and cash equivalents and any cash flow from operations will be sufficient to meet our anticipated cash needs, including for working capital purposes, capital expenditures and various contractual obligations, for at least the next 12 months. We may, however, require additional cash resources due to changed business conditions or other future developments, including any investments or acquisitions we may decide to pursue. If these sources are insufficient to satisfy our cash requirements, we may seek to sell debt securities or additional equity securities or to obtain a credit facility. The sale of additional equity securities could result in additional dilution to our stockholders. The incurrence of indebtedness would result in debt service obligations and could result in operating and financial covenants that would restrict our operations. In addition, there can be no assurance that any additional financing will be available on acceptable terms, if at all. We anticipate that, from time to time, we may evaluate acquisitions of complementary businesses, technologies or assets. However, there are no current understandings, commitments or agreements with respect to any acquisitions.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

As of July 31, 2009, we had no off-balance sheet arrangements as defined in Item 303(a)(4) of the SEC’s Regulation S-K.

Contractual Obligations and Commitments

We lease facilities for our corporate headquarters, subsidiaries and regional sales offices. We lease our principal facility in Cupertino, California under a non-cancelable operating lease agreement that expires in October 2013. We also have leases for our regional sales offices that are for 13 months or less.

The following table is a summary of our contractual obligations as of July 31, 2009:


			Payments Due by Period
	Total		Remainder		FY 2011		FY 2012		FY 2013		Thereafter
			of FY 2010
					(in thousands)
Operating lease obligations	$	9,164	$	1,770	$	2,057	$	2,068	$	2,151	$	1,118
Accrued contractual obligations		4,423		1,854		2,467		92		10		—

Total	$	13,587	$	3,624	$	4,524	$	2,160	$	2,161	$	1,118

On May 20, 2009, we entered into a software license agreement with Oracle USA, Inc that authorizes us to integrate Oracle database software with our ArcSight ESM products and distribute ArcSight ESM products with the embedded database software. Under the agreement, which has a two year term that commenced on May 31, 2009 when our prior agreement with Oracle expired, we have agreed to make royalty payments totaling $4.8 million over the license term. Under the prior agreement with Oracle, we made payments totaling $1.9 million through fiscal 2009.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

Refer to the discussion of recent accounting pronouncements in Note 2 Summary of Significant Accounting Policies in the Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements in this Quarterly Report, which information is incorporated herein by reference.

ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

Market Risk. Market risk represents the risk of loss that may impact our financial position due to adverse changes in financial market prices and rates. Our market risk exposure is primarily a result of fluctuations in foreign exchange rates and interest rates. We do not hold or issue financial instruments for trading purposes.

Foreign Currency Exchange Risk. To date, substantially all of our international sales have been denominated in U.S. dollars, and therefore the majority of our net revenues are not subject to foreign currency risk. Our operating expenses and cash flows are subject to fluctuations due to changes in foreign currency exchange rates, but historically have had relatively little impact on our operating results and cash flows. We utilize foreign currency forward and option contracts to manage our currency exposures as part of our ongoing business operations. We do not expect to enter into foreign currency exchange contracts for trading or speculative purposes.

Interest Rate Risk. Our investment policy is intended to preserve principal, provide liquidity and maximize income by limiting default risk, market risk and reinvestment risk. To minimize these risks, we primarily invest in money market funds. We had cash and cash equivalents totaling $101.5 million as of July 31, 2009, including the $45.9 million net proceeds from our IPO, which are primarily held for working capital and general corporate purposes. The fair value of our investment portfolio would not be significantly impacted by either a 100 basis point increase or decrease in market interest rates due mainly to the short-term nature of the majority of our investment portfolio. As a result, we do not believe that we have any material exposure to changes in the fair value of our investment portfolio as a result of changes in interest rates. Declines in interest rates, however, will reduce future interest income. We do not enter into investments for trading or speculative purposes.

ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

Our management, with the participation and supervision of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures pursuant to Rule 13a-15 under the Exchange Act. In designing and evaluating the disclosure controls and procedures, management recognizes that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objectives. In addition, the design of disclosure controls and procedures must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints and that management is required to apply its judgment in evaluating the potential benefits of possible controls and procedures relative to their costs.

Based on the aforementioned evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that as of July 31, 2009, our disclosure controls and procedures are designed at a reasonable assurance level and are effective to provide reasonable

assurance that information we are required to disclose in reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in SEC rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

Regulations under the Exchange Act require public companies, including our company, to evaluate any change in our “internal control over financial reporting” as such term is defined in Rule 13a-15(f) and Rule 15d-15(f) of the Exchange Act. In connection with their evaluation of our disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer did not identify any changes in our internal control over financial reporting during the fiscal quarter covered by this Quarterly Report that materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

From time to time, we are subject to various claims, complaints and legal actions in the normal course of business. We do not believe we are party to any currently pending litigation, the outcome of which will have a material adverse effect on our operations or financial position.

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS

Risk Related to Our Business and Industry

We operate in an emerging and evolving market and have a history of losses, and we are unable to predict the extent of any future losses.

We launched our ESM products in January 2002 and our first ArcSight Logger product in December 2006. Because the market for our products is relatively new and rapidly evolving, it is difficult for us to predict our operating results and the ultimate size of the market for our products. Although we recorded net income of $9.9 million for the fiscal year ended April 30, 2009, we have a history of losses from operations, incurring losses from operations of $1.4 million, $0.3 million and $16.8 million for the fiscal years ended April 30, 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively. As of July 31, 2009, our accumulated deficit was $35.8 million. We expect our operating expenses to increase over the next several years as we hire additional sales and marketing personnel, expand and improve the effectiveness of our distribution channel program and develop our technology and new products. In addition, we have incurred, and anticipate that we will continue to incur, significant legal, accounting and other expenses relating to being a public company. If our revenues do not increase to offset these expected increases in operating expenses, we may not continue to be profitable in future periods. Our historical revenue growth has been inconsistent, reflects fluctuations not related to performance and should not be considered indicative of our future performance. See the section entitled “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Sources of Revenue, Cost of Revenues and Operating Expenses.” Further, in future periods, our revenues could decline and, accordingly, we may not be able to sustain or increase profitability on a consistent basis, which may result in a decline in our common stock price.

Our future operating results may fluctuate significantly and our current operating results may not be a good indication of our future performance.

Our revenues and operating results could vary significantly from period to period as a result of a variety of factors, many of which are outside of our control. As a result, comparing our revenues and operating results on a period-to-period basis may not be meaningful, and you should not rely on our past results as an indication of our future performance. For example, revenues in fiscal 2006 and prior years excluded revenues related to multiple element sales transactions consummated in that year that were deferred because we did not have vendor-specific objective evidence of fair value, or VSOE, for some product elements that were not delivered in the fiscal year of the transaction. We recognize this deferred revenue in the period in which we either deliver these product elements or we and our customers amend the contractual terms of these sales transactions to remove the undelivered product elements. Our operating results were impacted by this treatment in fiscal 2009, 2008 and 2007 and may be similarly impacted in any particular

quarterly period in fiscal 2010 as we recognize this previously deferred revenue. For example, earnings for the three months ended July 31, 2009 were favorably impacted by $0.7 million of revenues from such transactions where the associated expenses were recorded in [fiscal 2006 or prior years]. We may not be able to accurately predict our future revenues or results of operations. We base our current and future expense levels on our operating plans and sales forecasts, and our operating costs are relatively fixed in the short term. As a result, we may not be able to reduce our costs sufficiently to compensate for an unexpected shortfall in revenues, and even a small shortfall in revenues could disproportionately and adversely affect financial results for that quarter. In addition, we recognize revenues from sales to some customers or resellers when cash is received, which may be delayed because of changes or issues with those customers or resellers. If our revenues or operating results fall below the expectations of investors or any securities analysts that may choose to cover our stock, the price of our common stock could decline substantially.

In addition to other risk factors listed in this section, factors that may affect our operating results include:

	•		the timing of our sales during the quarter, particularly since a large portion of our sales occurs in the last few weeks of the quarter and loss or delay of a few large contracts may have a significant adverse impact on our operating results;

	•		changes in the mix of revenues attributable to higher-margin revenues from ESM products as opposed to lower-margin revenues from sales of our appliance products;

	•		the timing of satisfying revenue recognition criteria, including, for example, establishing (1) VSOE for new products and maintaining VSOE for maintenance and services, particularly where we accrue the associated commission expense in a different period, and (2) sufficient history with respect to our newly introduced appliance licensing model such that revenue recognition criteria would be met on shipment of our appliances, rather than delaying revenue recognition until payment for these transactions in which we will be required to do until such history is established;

	•		changes in the renewal rate of maintenance agreements;

	•		our ability to estimate warranty claims accurately;

	•		general economic conditions, both domestically and in our foreign markets, and economic conditions specifically affecting industries in which our customers participate, such as the impact of the recent and continuing deterioration in global and U.S. economic and financial market conditions on the financial services and retail industries; and

	•		the impact of FIN 48, which requires us to establish reserves for uncertain tax positions and accrue potential tax penalties and interest.

Our sales cycle is long and unpredictable, and our sales efforts require considerable time and expense. As a result, our revenues are difficult to predict and may vary substantially from quarter to quarter, which may cause our operating results to fluctuate.

Our operating results may fluctuate, in part, because of the intensive nature of our sales efforts, the length and variability of the sales cycle of our ESM products and the short-term difficulty in adjusting our operating expenses. Because decisions to purchase products such as our ESM products involve significant capital commitments by customers, potential customers generally have our products evaluated at multiple levels within an organization, each often having specific and conflicting requirements. Enterprise customers make product purchasing decisions based in part on factors not directly related to the features of the products, including but not limited to the customers’ projections of business growth, uncertainty regarding economic conditions, capital budgets and anticipated cost savings from implementation of the software. As a result of these factors, selling our products often requires an extensive effort throughout a customer’s organization. The recent and continuing deterioration in global and U.S. economic and financial market conditions has increased the duration and intensity of our sales efforts as customers enhance their review of spending decisions. In addition, we have less experience with sales of ArcSight Logger, ArcSight Express and our other appliance products. As a result, the sales cycle for these products may be lengthy or may vary significantly. Our sales efforts involve educating our customers, who are often relatively unfamiliar with our products and their technical capabilities, as well as the value of our products, including the potential cost savings to the organization that our products may generate. We spend substantial time, effort and money in our sales efforts without any assurance that our efforts will produce any sales.

The length of our sales cycle, from initial evaluation to delivery of products, tends to be long and varies substantially from customer to customer. Our sales cycle is typically three to six months but can extend to more than a year for some sales. We typically

recognize a large portion of our product revenues in the last few weeks of a quarter. It is difficult to predict exactly when, or even if, we will actually make a sale with a potential customer. As a result, large individual sales have, in some cases, occurred in quarters subsequent to those we anticipated, or have not occurred at all. The loss or delay of one or more large product transactions in a quarter could impact our operating results for that quarter and any future quarters for which revenues from that transaction are delayed. As a result of these factors, it is difficult for us to accurately forecast product revenues in any quarter. Because a substantial portion of our expenses are relatively fixed in the short term, our operating results will suffer if revenues fall below our expectations in a particular quarter, which could cause the price of our common stock to decline significantly.

If we fail to further develop and manage our distribution channels, our revenues could decline and our growth prospects could suffer.

We derive a portion of our revenues from sales of our products and related services through channel partners, such as resellers and systems integrators. In particular, systems integrators are an important source of sales leads for us in the U.S. public sector, as government agencies often rely on them to meet information technology, or IT, needs. We also use resellers to augment our internal resources in international markets and, to a lesser extent, domestically. We may be required by our U.S. government customers to utilize particular resellers that may not meet our criteria for creditworthiness, and revenues from those resellers may not be recognizable until receipt of payment. We have derived, and anticipate that in the future we will continue to derive, a substantial portion of the sales of ArcSight Logger and other appliance products through channel partners, including parties with which we have not yet developed relationships. We expect that channel sales will represent a substantial portion of our U.S. government and international revenues for the foreseeable future and, we believe, a growing portion of our U.S. commercial revenues. We may be unable to successfully expand and improve the effectiveness of our channel sales program. If we do not successfully execute our strategy to increase channel sales, particularly to further penetrate the mid-market and sell our appliance products, our growth prospects may be materially and adversely affected.

Our agreements with our channel partners are generally non-exclusive and many of our channel partners have more established relationships with our competitors. If our channel partners do not effectively market and sell our products, if they choose to place greater emphasis on products of their own or those offered by our competitors, or if they fail to meet the needs of our customers, our ability to grow our business and sell our products may be adversely affected, particularly in the public sector, the mid-market and internationally. Similarly, the loss of a substantial number of our channel partners, who may cease marketing our products and services with limited or no notice and with little or no penalty, and our possible inability to replace them, the failure to recruit additional channel partners, or any reduction or delay in their sales of our products and services or conflicts between channel sales and our direct sales and marketing activities could materially and adversely affect our results of operations. In addition, changes in the proportion of our revenues attributable to sales by channel partners, which are more likely than direct sales to involve collectability concerns at the time of contract execution and product delivery, may cause our operating results to fluctuate from period to period.

Because we derive a majority of our revenues from ArcSight ESM and related products and services, any failure of this product to satisfy customer demands or to achieve increased market acceptance will harm our business, operating results, financial condition and growth prospects.

We have derived a majority of our product revenues from ArcSight ESM and related products. Demand for ArcSight ESM is affected by a number of factors beyond our control, including the timing of development and release of new products by us and our competitors, technological change, and lower-than-expected growth or a contraction in the worldwide market for enterprise security and compliance management solutions or other risks described in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. If we are unable to continue to meet customer demands or to achieve more widespread market acceptance of ArcSight ESM, our business, operating results, financial condition and growth prospects will be adversely affected.

If we are unable to successfully develop and market new products, make enhancements to our existing products or expand our offerings into new markets, our business may not grow and our operating results may suffer.

We introduced our first ArcSight Logger product in fiscal 2007 and are currently developing new versions of this product, ESM and the other products in our SIEM platform, as well as new complementary products. Our growth strategy and future financial performance will depend, in part, on our ability to market and sell these products and to diversify our offerings by successfully developing, timely introducing and gaining customer acceptance of new products.

The software in our products, particularly our ArcSight ESM and ArcSight Express products, is especially complex because it must recognize, effectively interact with and manage a wide variety of devices and applications, and effectively identify and respond to new and increasingly sophisticated security threats and other risks, while not impeding the high network performance demanded by our

customers. The typical development cycle for a patch to our ESM software is one to three months, a service pack is four to six months and a new version or major sub-version is 12 to 18 months, if and when available. Customers and industry analysts expect speedy introduction of software to respond to new threats and risks and to add new functionality, and we may be unable to meet these expectations. Since developing new products or new versions of, or add-ons to, existing products is complex, the timetable for their commercial release is difficult to predict and may vary from our historical experience, which could result in delays in their introduction from anticipated or announced release dates. We may not offer updates as rapidly as new threats affect our customers. If we do not quickly respond to the rapidly changing and rigorous needs of our customers by developing and introducing on a timely basis new and effective products, upgrades and services that can respond adequately to new security threats, our competitive position, business and growth prospects will be harmed.

Diversifying our product offerings and expanding into new markets will require significant investment and planning, will bring us more directly into competition with software providers that may be better established or have greater resources than we do, will require additional investment of time and resources in the development and training of our channel and strategic partners and will entail significant risk of failure. Sales of our ArcSight Logger and ArcSight Express products and other products that we may develop and market may reduce revenues of our flagship ESM product and our overall margin by offering a subset of features or capabilities of our flagship ESM products at a reduced price with a lower gross margin. If the average selling price for orders of such alternate products is lower, we may need to sell to a larger number of customers to achieve equivalent revenues, potentially incurring increased sales, marketing and general and administrative expenses in support of those sales. Moreover, increased emphasis on the sale of our appliance products, add-on products or new product lines could distract us from sales of our core ArcSight ESM offering, negatively affecting our overall sales. If we fail or delay in diversifying our existing offerings or expanding into new markets, or we are unsuccessful competing in these new markets, our business, operating results and prospects may suffer.

If we are not able to maintain and enhance our brand, our business and operating results may be harmed.

We believe that maintaining and enhancing our brand identity is critical to our relationships with, and to our ability to attract, new customers and partners. The successful promotion of our brand will depend largely upon our marketing and public relations efforts, our ability to continue to offer high-quality products and services, and our ability to successfully differentiate our products and services from those of our competitors, especially to the extent that our competitors integrate or bundle competitive offerings with a broader array of products and services that they may offer. Our brand promotion activities may not be successful or yield increased revenues. In addition, extension of our brand to products and uses different from our traditional products and services may dilute our brand, particularly if we fail to maintain the quality of our products and services in these new areas. Moreover, it may be difficult to maintain and enhance our brand in connection with sales through channel or strategic partners. The promotion of our brand requires us to make substantial expenditures, and we anticipate that the expenditures will increase as our market becomes more competitive and as we expand into new markets. To the extent that these activities yield increased revenues, these revenues may not offset the expenses we incur. If we do not successfully maintain and enhance our brand, our business may not grow, we may have reduced pricing power relative to competitors with stronger brands, and we could lose customers and channel partners, all of which would harm our business, operating results and financial condition.

In addition, independent industry analysts often provide reviews of our products and services, as well as those of our competitors, and perception of our products in the marketplace may be significantly influenced by these reviews. We have no control over what these industry analysts report, and because industry analysts may influence current and potential customers, our brand could be harmed if they do not provide a positive review of our products and services or view us as a market leader.

We face intense competition in our market, especially from larger, better-known companies, and we may lack sufficient financial or other resources to maintain or improve our competitive position.

The market for enterprise security and compliance management and log collection and storage products is intensely competitive, and we expect competition to increase in the future. A significant number of companies have developed, or are developing, products that currently, or in the future are likely to, compete with some or all of our products. We may not compete successfully against our current or potential competitors, especially those with significantly greater financial resources or brand name recognition. Companies competing with us may introduce products that have greater performance or functionality or incorporate technological advances that we have not yet developed or implemented. In addition, companies competing with us may price their products more competitively than ours, or have an entirely different pricing or distribution model, such as making introductory versions with limited functionality available as freeware products.

Our competitors include large software companies, software or hardware network infrastructure companies, smaller software companies offering more narrowly focused enterprise security and compliance management and log collection and storage products, and small and large companies offering point solutions that compete with components of our platform or individual products. Existing competitors for a security and compliance management software platform solution such as our ESM products primarily are specialized, privately-held companies, such as Intellitactics and netForensics, as well as larger companies such as CA, Cisco, EMC, IBM, Novell and Symantec. Current competitors for sales of our ArcSight Logger products include specialized, privately-held companies, such as LogLogic and SenSage. In addition to these current competitors, we expect to face competition for our appliance products from existing large, diversified software and hardware companies, from specialized, smaller companies and from new companies that may seek to enter this market.

Another source of competition is represented by the custom internal efforts undertaken by potential customers to analyze and manage the information produced from their existing devices and applications to identify and remediate threats. Many companies, in particular large corporate enterprises, have developed software internally that is an alternative to our enterprise security and compliance management and log collection and storage products. Wide adoption of our Common Event Format, which we are promoting as a standard for event logs generated by security and other products, may facilitate this internal development.

Wide adoption of our Common Event Format may also allow our competitors to offer products with a degree of compatibility similar to ours or may facilitate new entrants into our business. New competitors may emerge and rapidly acquire significant market share due to factors such as greater brand name recognition, larger installed customer bases and significantly greater financial, technical, marketing and other resources and experience. If these new competitors are successful, we would lose market share and our revenues would likely decline.

Mergers or consolidations among our competitors, or acquisitions of our competitors by large companies, present heightened competitive challenges to our business. For example, in recent years IBM has acquired Internet Security Systems, Inc., Micromuse and Consul, Novell acquired e-Security and EMC acquired Network Intelligence. These acquisitions will make these combined entities potentially more formidable competitors to us if their products and offerings are effectively integrated. Continued industry consolidation may impact customers’ perceptions of the viability of smaller or even medium-sized software firms and, consequently, customers’ willingness to purchase from those firms.

Many of our existing and potential competitors enjoy substantial competitive advantages, such as:

	•		greater name recognition and longer operating histories;

	•		larger sales and marketing budgets and resources;

	•		the capacity to leverage their sales efforts and marketing expenditures across a broader portfolio of products;

	•		broader distribution and established relationships with distribution partners;

	•		access to larger customer bases;

	•		greater customer support;

	•		greater resources to make acquisitions;

	•		lower labor and development costs; and

	•		substantially greater financial, technical and other resources.

As a result, they may be able to adapt more quickly and effectively to new or emerging technologies and changing opportunities, standards or customer requirements. In addition, these companies have reduced, and could continue to reduce, the price of their enterprise security and compliance management, log collection and storage products and managed security services, resulting in intensified pricing pressures within our market.

Increased competition could result in fewer customer orders, price reductions, reduced operating margins and loss of market share. Our larger competitors also may be able to provide customers with different or greater capabilities or benefits than we can provide in

areas such as technical qualifications, geographic presence, or provide customers a broader range of services and products and price. In addition, large competitors may have more extensive relationships within large enterprises, the federal government or foreign governments, which relationships may provide them with an advantage in competing for business with those potential customers. Our ability to compete will depend upon our ability to provide better performance than our competitors at a competitive price. We may be required to make substantial additional investments in research, development, marketing and sales in order to respond to competition, and we cannot assure you that we will be able to compete successfully in the future.

We may not be able to compete effectively with companies that integrate or bundle products similar to ours with their other product offerings.

Many large, integrated software companies offer suites of products that include software applications for security and compliance management. In addition, hardware vendors, including diversified, global concerns, offer products that address the security and compliance needs of the enterprises and government agencies that comprise our target market. Further, several companies currently sell software products that our customers and potential customers have broadly adopted, providing them a substantial advantage when they sell products that perform functions substantially similar to some of our products. Competitors that offer a large array of security or software products may be able to offer products or functionality similar to ours at a more attractive price than we can by integrating or bundling them with their other product offerings. The consolidation in our industry increases the likelihood of competition based on integration or bundling. Customers may also increasingly seek to consolidate their enterprise-level software purchases with a small number of larger companies that can purport to satisfy a broad range of their requirements. If we are unable to sufficiently differentiate our products from the integrated or bundled products of our competitors, such as by offering enhanced functionality, performance or value, we may see a decrease in demand for our products, which would adversely affect our business, operating results and financial condition. Similarly, if customers seek to concentrate their software purchases with a few large providers, we may be at a competitive disadvantage.

We have less experience with sale, manufacture, delivery, service and support of ArcSight Logger and our other appliance products and rely on a single contract manufacturer for manufacture and fulfillment of our appliance products, and as a result we may be unable to successfully forecast demand or fulfill orders for these appliance products.

We introduced our first ArcSight Logger product in fiscal 2007. Prior to June 2006, we offered only software products and related services, and as a result have less experience with sales of appliance-based products than we have with our flagship ESM products. Fulfillment of sales of our appliance products involves hardware manufacturing, inventory, import certification and return merchandise authorization processes with which we have less experience. For example, if we fail to accurately predict demand and as a result our manufacturer maintains insufficient hardware inventory or excess inventory, we may be unable to timely deliver ordered products or may have substantial inventory expense. As the size of individual orders increases, we may be unable to cause delivery of large unforecasted orders, particularly near the end of quarterly periods. In addition, we use a single source for manufacture and fulfillment of our appliance products and if our equipment vendor fails to manufacture our appliance products or fulfill orders in required volumes, in a timely manner, at a sufficient level of quality, or at all, if it is no longer financially viable or for other reasons, we may be unable to fulfill customer orders and our operating results may fluctuate from period to period, particularly if a disruption occurs near the end of a fiscal period. Disruptions in the manufacture and fulfillment of our products could damage our reputation and relationships with our customers and result in revenue declines and a negative effect on our growth prospects. In addition, if we change our hardware configuration or manufacturer, some countries may require us to reinitiate their import certification process. If we are unable to successfully perform these functions or develop a relationship with a fulfillment partner that does so for us, our sales, operating results and financial condition may be harmed. In addition, the process of obtaining additional or alternative capacity with another contract manufacturer would likely result in an increase of cost of goods sold, which could negatively impact our financial performance if we are unable to offset such increases with increases in the prices we charge our customers.

We face risks related to customer outsourcing to managed security service providers.

Some of our customers have outsourced the management of their IT departments or the network security operations function to large systems integrators or managed security service providers, or MSSPs. If this trend continues, our established customer relationships could be disrupted and our products could be displaced by alternative system and network protection solutions offered by systems integrators or MSSPs. Significant product displacements could impact our revenues and have a negative effect on our business. While to date we have developed a number of successful relationships with MSSPs, they may develop or acquire their own technologies rather than purchasing our products for use in provision of managed security services.

Seasonality may cause fluctuations in our operating results.

We believe that our product revenue has been somewhat seasonal historically, with the first quarter of our fiscal year typically having relatively lower product revenue, the second and third quarters of our fiscal year increasing from there and the fourth quarter of our fiscal year typically having relatively higher product revenue. We believe that this seasonality results from a number of factors, including:

	•		the fiscal year end procurement cycles of both our government and commercial customers;

	•		the budgeting, procurement and work cycles of our customers, including customers in the public sector;

	•		the timing of our annual sales “club” for top performers and annual training for our entire sales force in our first fiscal quarter;

	•		seasonal reductions in business activity during the summer months in the United States, Europe and certain other regions;

	•		sales to customers with a standard December 31 fiscal year end that may positively impact our license revenue in the third quarter of our fiscal year; and

	•		the structure of our direct sales incentive and compensation program, which may reinforce the tendency of our direct sales team to book the largest volume of deals toward the end of our fiscal year.

The timing of our quarterly period boundaries and the U.S. federal government’s September 30 fiscal year end may impact product sales to governmental agencies in the second quarter of our fiscal year, offsetting the otherwise seasonal downturn in later summer months. We expect these seasonal factors to continue to impact our business in the future, and any seasonality that we experience may cause fluctuations in our operating results. We believe that our rapid historical growth, the timing of the launch of new products and the timing of large product sales transactions near period boundaries, may have overshadowed the nature or magnitude of seasonal or cyclical factors that might have influenced our business to date. They may do so again in the future. Seasonal or cyclical variations in our operations may become more pronounced over time and may materially adversely affect our results of operations in the future.

Our business depends, in part, on sales to the public sector, and significant changes in the contracting or fiscal policies of the public sector could have a material adverse effect on our business.

We derive a portion of our revenues from contracts with federal, state, local and foreign governments and government agencies, and we believe that the success and growth of our business will continue to depend on our successful procurement of government contracts. For example, we have historically derived, and expect to continue to derive, a significant portion of our revenues from sales to agencies of the U.S. federal government, either directly by us or through systems integrators and other resellers. In the three months ended July 31, 2009 and the fiscal years ended April 30, 2009, 2008 and 2007, we derived 28%, 22%, 20% and 32% of our revenues, respectively, from contracts with agencies of the U.S. federal government. Accordingly:

	•		changes in fiscal or contracting policies or decreases in available government funding;

	•		changes in government programs or applicable requirements;

	•		the adoption of new laws or regulations or changes to existing laws or regulations;

	•		changes in political or social attitudes with respect to security issues; and

	•		potential delays or changes in the government appropriations process

could cause governments and governmental agencies to delay or refrain from purchasing the products and services that we offer in the future or otherwise have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Failure to comply with laws or regulations applicable to our business could cause us to lose U.S. government customers or our ability to contract with the U.S. government.

We must comply with laws and regulations relating to the formation, administration and performance of U.S. government contracts, which affect how we and our channel partners do business with U.S. government agencies. These laws and regulations may impose added costs on our business, and failure to comply with these or other applicable regulations and requirements, including non-compliance in the past, could lead to claims for damages from our channel partners, and penalties, termination of contracts and suspension or debarment from government contracting for a period of time with U.S. government agencies. Any such damages, penalties, disruption or limitation in our ability to do business with the U.S. government could have a material adverse effect on our business, operating results and financial condition.

Our government contracts may limit our ability to move development activities overseas and to source components from some countries, which may impair our ability to optimize our product development costs and compete for non-government contracts.

Increasingly, product development and component sourcing are being shifted to lower-cost countries, such as India and China. However, some contracts with U.S. government agencies require that at least 50% of the components of each of our products be of U.S. origin or that each product be substantially transformed in the U.S. or in a country on the U.S. government’s list of designated countries. Consequently, our ability to optimize our product development by conducting it overseas and to lower our costs of goods sold by sourcing from lower cost regions may be hampered. Some of our competitors do not rely on contracts with the U.S. government to the same degree as we do and may develop product or source components offshore, or may have the scale to permit them to separately source versions of their competing products for sale to customers other than U.S. government agencies. If we are unable to develop product or source components as cost-effectively as our competitors, our ability to compete for our non-government customers may be reduced and our customer sales may decline, resulting in decreased revenues.

Real or perceived errors, failures or bugs in our products could adversely affect our operating results and growth prospects.

Because we offer very complex products, undetected errors, failures or bugs may occur, especially when products are first introduced or when new versions are released. Our products are often installed and used in large-scale computing environments with different operating systems, system management software and equipment and networking configurations, which may cause errors or failures in our products or may expose undetected errors, failures or bugs in our products. Despite testing by us, errors, failures or bugs may not be found in new products or releases until after commencement of commercial shipments. In the past, we have discovered software errors, failures and bugs in some of our product offerings after their introduction.

In addition, our products could be perceived to be ineffective for a variety of reasons outside of our control. Hackers could circumvent our customers’ security measures, and customers may misuse our products resulting in a security breach or perceived product failure. We provide a top-level enterprise security and compliance management solution that integrates a wide variety of other elements in a customer’s IT and security infrastructure, and we may receive blame for a security breach that was the result of the failure of one of the other elements.

Real or perceived errors, failures or bugs in our products could result in negative publicity, loss of or delay in market acceptance of our products, loss of competitive position or claims by customers for losses sustained by them. In such an event, we may be required, or may choose, for customer relations or other reasons, to expend additional resources in order to help correct the problem. Our product liability insurance may not be adequate. Further, provisions in our license agreements with end users that limit our exposure to liabilities arising from such claims may not be enforceable in some circumstances or may not fully protect us against such claims and related liabilities and costs. Defending a lawsuit, regardless of its merit, could be costly and could limit the amount of time that management has available for day-to-day execution and strategic planning or other matters.

Many of our end-user customers use our products in applications that are critical to their businesses and may have a greater sensitivity to defects in our products than to defects in other, less critical, software products. In addition, if an actual or perceived breach of information integrity or availability occurs in one of our end-user customer’s systems, regardless of whether the breach is attributable to our products, the market perception of the effectiveness of our products could be harmed. Alleviating any of these problems could require significant expenditures of our capital and other resources and could cause interruptions, delays or cessation of our product licensing, which could cause us to lose existing or potential customers and could adversely affect our operating results and growth prospects.

In addition, because we are a leading provider of enterprise security products and services, “hackers” and others may try to access our data or compromise our systems. If we are the subject of a successful attack, then our reputation in the industry and with current and potential customers may be compromised and our sales and operating results could be adversely affected.

Incorrect or improper use of our complex products, our failure to properly train customers on how to utilize our products or our failure to properly provide consulting and implementation services could result in customer dissatisfaction and negatively affect our results of operations and growth prospects.

Our ESM products are complex and are deployed in a wide variety of network environments. The proper use of our products, particularly our ESM products, requires training of the end user. If our products are not used correctly or as intended, inadequate performance may result. For example, among other things, deployment of our ESM products requires categorization of IT assets and assignment of business or criticality values for each, selection or configuration of one of our pre-packaged rule sets, user interfaces and network utilization parameters, and deployment of connectors for the various devices and applications from which event data are to be collected. Our customers or our professional services personnel may incorrectly implement or use our products. Our products may also be intentionally misused or abused by customers or their employees or third parties who obtain access and use of our products. Similarly, our ArcSight Express product, and to a lesser extent our ArcSight Logger products, while less complex than our ESM products, are often distributed through channel partners and sold to customers with smaller or less sophisticated IT departments, potentially resulting in sub-optimal installation and, consequently, performance that is less than the level anticipated by the end user. Because our customers rely on our product, service and maintenance offerings to manage a wide range of sensitive security, network and compliance functions, the incorrect or improper use of our products, our failure to properly train customers on how to efficiently and effectively use our products, our failure to properly provide consulting and implementation services and maintenance to our customers or our failure to properly provide SOC services may result in negative publicity or legal claims against us.

In addition, if customer personnel are not well trained in the use of our products, customers may defer the deployment of our products, may deploy them in a more limited manner than originally anticipated or may not deploy them at all. If there is substantial turnover of the customer personnel responsible for implementation and use of our products, our product may go unused and our ability to make additional sales may be substantially limited.

If we are unable to maintain effective relationships with our technology partners, we may not be able to support the interoperability of our software with a wide variety of security and other products and our business may be harmed.

A key feature of ArcSight ESM is that it provides out-of-the-box support for many third-party devices and applications that the customer may use in its business and technology infrastructure. To provide effective interoperability, we work with individual product vendors to develop our SmartConnectors, which allow our ESM ArcSight Logger and ArcSight Express products to interface with third party products. In addition, we are promoting the adoption of our Common Event Format as a standard way to format system log events. Some of these technology partners are current or potential competitors of ours. If we are unable to develop and maintain effective relationships with a wide variety of technology partners, if companies adopt more restrictive policies with respect to, or impose unfavorable terms and conditions on, access to their products, or if our Common Event Format is not widely adopted, we may not be able to continue to provide our customers with a high degree of interoperability with their existing IT and business infrastructure, which could reduce our sales and adversely affect our business, operating results and financial condition.

Our international sales and operations subject us to additional risks that can adversely affect our operating results.

In the three months ended July 31, 2009 and the fiscal years ended April 30, 2009, 2008 and 2007, we derived 22%, 27%, 33% and 23% of our revenues, respectively, from customers outside the United States, and we are continuing to expand our international operations as part of our growth strategy. We currently have sales personnel and sales and support operations in Australia, Austria, Brazil, Canada, China, France, Germany, Hong Kong, India, Italy, Japan, the Netherlands, Singapore, Spain and the United Kingdom. Our international operations subject us to a variety of risks, including:

	•		increased management, travel, infrastructure and legal compliance costs associated with having multiple international operations;

	•		longer payment cycles and difficulties in collecting accounts receivable, especially in emerging markets, and the likelihood that revenues from international resellers and customers may need to be recognized when cash is received, at least until satisfactory payment history has been established;

	•		the need to localize our products and licensing programs for international customers;

	•		differing regulatory and legal requirements and possible enactment of additional regulations or restrictions on the use, import or export of encryption technologies and our appliance-based products, which could delay or prevent the sale or use of our products in some jurisdictions;

	•		weaker protection of intellectual property rights in some countries; and

	•		overlapping of different tax regimes.

Any of these risks could harm our international operations and reduce our international sales, adversely affecting our business, operating results and financial condition and growth prospects.

Our business in countries with a history of corruption and transactions with foreign governments increase the risks associated with our international activities.

As we operate and sell internationally, we are subject to the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, or the FCPA, and other laws that prohibit improper payments or offers of payments to foreign governments and their officials and political parties by U.S. and other business entities for the purpose of obtaining or retaining business. We have operations, deal with and make sales to governmental or quasi-governmental customers in countries known to experience corruption, particularly certain emerging countries in East Asia, Eastern Europe and the Middle East, and further expansion of our international selling efforts may involve additional regions, including Africa, Russia and South America. Our activities in these countries create the risk of unauthorized payments or offers of payments by one of our employees, consultants, sales agents or channel partners that could be in violation of various laws including the FCPA, even though these parties are not always subject to our control. We have implemented safeguards to discourage these practices by our employees, consultants, sales agents and channel partners. However, our existing safeguards and any future improvements may prove to be less than effective, and our employees, consultants, sales agents or channel partners may engage in conduct for which we might be held responsible. Violations of the FCPA may result in severe criminal or civil sanctions, including suspension or debarment from U.S. government contracting, and we may be subject to other liabilities, which could negatively affect our business, operating results and financial condition.

Failure to protect our intellectual property rights could adversely affect our business.

Our success depends, in part, on our ability to protect proprietary methods and technologies that we develop under patent and other intellectual property laws of the United States, so that we can prevent others from using our inventions and proprietary information. If we fail to protect our intellectual property rights adequately, our competitors might gain access to our technology, and our business might be harmed. In addition, defending our intellectual property rights might entail significant expenses. Any of our patents, copyrights, trademarks or other intellectual property rights may be challenged by others or invalidated through administrative process or litigation. We have eight issued patents and a number of patent applications pending in the United States, internationally and in specific foreign countries. Our issued patents may not provide us with any competitive advantages or may be challenged by third parties, and our patent applications may never be granted at all. Additionally, the process of obtaining patent protection is expensive and time-consuming, and we may not be able to prosecute all necessary or desirable patent applications at a reasonable cost or in a timely manner. Even if issued, there can be no assurance that these patents will adequately protect our intellectual property, as the legal standards relating to the validity, enforceability and scope of protection of patent and other intellectual property rights are uncertain.

Any patents that are issued may subsequently be invalidated or otherwise limited, enabling other companies to better develop products that compete with ours, which could adversely affect our competitive business position, business prospects and financial condition. In addition, issuance of a patent does not guarantee that we have a right to practice the patented invention. Patent applications in the U.S. are typically not published until 18 months after filing, or in some cases not at all, and publications of discoveries in industry-related literature lag behind actual discoveries. We cannot be certain that we were the first to make the inventions claimed in our issued patents or pending patent applications or otherwise used in our products, that we were the first to file for protection in our patent applications, or that third parties do not have blocking patents that could be used to prevent us from marketing or practicing our patented products or technology. Effective patent, trademark, copyright and trade secret protection may not be available to us in every country in which our products and services are available. The laws of some foreign countries may not

be as protective of intellectual property rights as those in the United States, and mechanisms for enforcement of intellectual property rights may be inadequate. Accordingly, despite our efforts, we may be unable to prevent third parties from infringing upon or misappropriating our intellectual property.

We might be required to spend significant resources to monitor and protect our intellectual property rights. We may initiate claims or litigation against third parties for infringement of our proprietary rights or to establish the validity of our proprietary rights. Any litigation, whether or not it is resolved in our favor, could result in significant expense to us and divert the efforts of our technical and management personnel, which may adversely affect our business, operating results and financial condition.

Confidentiality agreements with employees and others may not adequately prevent disclosure of trade secrets and other proprietary information.

In order to protect our proprietary technology, processes and methods, we rely in part on confidentiality agreements with our corporate partners, employees, consultants, advisors and others. These agreements may not effectively prevent disclosure of confidential information and may not provide an adequate remedy in the event of unauthorized disclosure of confidential information. In addition, others may independently discover trade secrets and proprietary information, and in these cases we would not be able to assert any trade secret rights against those parties. Costly and time-consuming litigation could be necessary to enforce and determine the scope of our proprietary rights, and failure to obtain or maintain trade secret protection could adversely affect our competitive business position.

We may in the future be subject to intellectual property rights claims, which are extremely costly to defend, could require us to pay significant damages and could limit our ability to use certain technologies.

Companies in the software, networking and technology industries, including some of our current and potential competitors, own large numbers of patents, copyrights, trademarks and trade secrets and frequently enter into litigation based on allegations of infringement or other violations of intellectual property rights. In addition, many of these companies have the capability to dedicate substantially greater resources to enforce their intellectual property rights and to defend claims that may be brought against them. The litigation may involve patent holding companies or other adverse patent owners who have no relevant product revenues and against whom our potential patents may provide little or no deterrence. We have received, and may in the future receive, notices that claim we have misappropriated or misused other parties’ intellectual property rights, and, to the extent we gain greater visibility, we face a higher risk of being the subject of intellectual property infringement claims, which is not uncommon with respect to software technologies in general and network security technology in particular. There may be third-party intellectual property rights, including issued or pending patents, that cover significant aspects of our technologies or business methods. Any intellectual property claims, with or without merit, could be very time-consuming, could be expensive to settle or litigate and could divert our management’s attention and other resources. These claims could also subject us to significant liability for damages, potentially including treble damages if we are found to have willfully infringed patents or copyrights. These claims could also result in our having to stop using technology found to be in violation of a third party’s rights. We might be required to seek a license for the intellectual property, which may not be available on reasonable terms or at all. Even if a license were available, we could be required to pay significant royalties, which would increase our operating expenses. As a result, we may be required to develop alternative non-infringing technology, which could require significant effort and expense. If we cannot license or develop technology for any infringing aspect of our business, we would be forced to limit or stop sales of one or more of our products or product features and may be unable to compete effectively. Any of these results would harm our business, operating results and financial condition.

We rely on software licensed from other parties, the loss of which could increase our costs and delay software shipments.

We utilize various types of software licensed from unaffiliated third parties in order to provide certain elements of our product offering. For example, we license database software from Oracle that we integrate with our ESM product. Our agreement with Oracle permits us to distribute Oracle software in our products to our customers and partners worldwide through May 2011. See the section entitled “Item 1. Business—Intellectual Property—Oracle License Agreement” in Part I of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended April 30, 2009. Any errors or defects in this third-party software could result in errors that could harm our business. In addition, licensed software may not continue to be available on commercially reasonable terms, or at all. While we believe that there are currently adequate replacements for third-party software, any loss of the right to use any of this software could result in delays in producing or delivering our software until equivalent technology is identified and integrated, which delays could harm our business. Our business would be disrupted if any of the software we license from others or functional equivalents of this software were either no longer available to us or no longer offered to us on commercially reasonable terms. In either case, we would be required to

either redesign our products to function with software available from other parties or to develop these components ourselves, which would result in increased costs and could result in delays in our product shipments and the release of new product offerings. Furthermore, we might be forced to limit the features available in our current or future products. If we fail to maintain or renegotiate any of these software licenses, we could face significant delays and diversion of resources in attempting to license and integrate a functional equivalent of the software.

Some of our products contain “open source” software, and any failure to comply with the terms of one or more of these open source licenses could negatively affect our business.

Certain of our products are distributed with software licensed by its authors or other third parties under “open source” licenses. Some of these licenses contain requirements that we make available source code for modifications or derivative works we create based upon the open source software, and that we license these modifications or derivative works under the terms of a particular open source license or other license granting third parties certain rights of further use. If we combine our proprietary software with open source software in a certain manner, we could, under certain provisions of the open source licenses, be required to release the source code of our proprietary software. In addition to risks related to license requirements, usage of open source software can lead to greater risks than use of third-party commercial software, as open source licensors generally do not provide warranties or controls on origin of the software. We have established processes to help alleviate these risks, including a review process for screening requests from our development organization for the use of open source software, and we plan to implement the use of software tools to review our source code for potential inclusion of open source software, but we cannot be sure that all open source software is submitted for approval prior to use in our products or that such software tools will be effective. In addition, open source license terms may be ambiguous and many of the risks associated with usage of open source software cannot be eliminated, and could, if not properly addressed, negatively affect our business. If we were found to have inappropriately used open source software, we may be required to re-engineer our products, to release proprietary source code, to discontinue the sale of our products in the event re-engineering could not be accomplished on a timely basis or to take other remedial action that may divert resources away from our development efforts, any of which could adversely affect our business, operating results and financial condition.

Indemnity provisions in various agreements potentially expose us to substantial liability for intellectual property infringement and other losses.

Our agreements with customers and channel partners include indemnification provisions, under which we agree to indemnify them for losses suffered or incurred as a result of claims of intellectual property infringement and, in some cases, for damages caused by us to property or persons. The term of these indemnity provisions is generally perpetual after execution of the corresponding product sale agreement. Large indemnity payments could harm our business, operating results and financial condition.

Changes or reforms in the law or regulatory landscape could diminish the demand for our solutions, and could have a negative impact on our business.

One factor that drives demand for our products and services is the legal and regulatory framework in which our customers operate. Laws and regulations are subject to drastic changes, and these could either help or hurt the demand for our products. Thus, some changes in the law and regulatory landscape, such as legislative reforms that limit corporate compliance obligations, could significantly harm our business.

If we are unable to attract and retain personnel, our business would be harmed.

We depend on the continued contributions of our senior management and other key personnel, in particular Tom Reilly and Hugh Njemanze, the loss of whom could harm our business. All of our executive officers and key employees are at-will employees, which means they may terminate their employment relationship with us at any time. We do not maintain a key-person life insurance policy on any of our officers or other employees.

Our future success also depends on our ability to identify, attract and retain highly skilled technical, managerial, finance and other personnel, particularly in our sales and marketing, research and development and professional service departments. We face intense competition for qualified individuals from numerous security, software and other technology companies. In addition, competition for qualified personnel is particularly intense in the San Francisco Bay Area, where our headquarters are located. Often, significant amounts of time and resources are required to train technical, sales and other personnel. Qualified individuals are in high demand. We may incur significant costs to attract and retain them, and we may lose new employees to our competitors or other technology

companies before we realize the benefit of our investment in recruiting and training them. We may be unable to attract and retain suitably qualified individuals who are capable of meeting our growing technical, operational and managerial requirements, on a timely basis or at all, and we may be required to pay increased compensation in order to do so. If we are unable to attract and retain the qualified personnel we need to succeed, our business would suffer.

Volatility or lack of performance in our stock price may also affect our ability to attract and retain our key employees. Many of our senior management personnel and other key employees have become, or will soon become, vested in a substantial amount of stock or stock options. Employees may be more likely to leave us if the shares they own or the shares underlying their vested options have significantly appreciated in value relative to the original purchase prices of the shares or the exercise prices of the options, or if the exercise prices of the options that they hold are significantly above the market price of our common stock. If we are unable to retain our employees, our business, operating results and financial condition would be harmed.

If we fail to manage future growth effectively, our business would be harmed.

We operate in an emerging market and have experienced, and may continue to experience, significant expansion of our operations. In particular, we grew from 335 employees as of April 30, 2008 to 433 employees as of July 31, 2009. This growth has placed, and will continue to place, a strain on our employees, management systems and other resources. Managing our growth will require significant expenditures and allocation of valuable management resources. If we fail to achieve the necessary level of efficiency in our organization as it grows, our business, operating results and financial condition would be harmed.

Future acquisitions could disrupt our business and harm our financial condition and results of operations.

We have expanded by acquisition in the past, and we may pursue additional acquisitions in the future, any of which could be material to our business, operating results and financial condition. Our ability as an organization to successfully acquire and integrate technologies or businesses on a larger scale is unproven. Acquisitions involve many risks, including the following:

	•		an acquisition may negatively impact our results of operations because it may require us to incur charges and substantial debt or liabilities, may cause adverse tax consequences, substantial depreciation or deferred compensation charges, may result in acquired in-process research and development expenses or in the future may require the amortization, write-down or impairment of amounts related to deferred compensation, goodwill and other intangible assets, or may not generate sufficient financial return to offset acquisition costs;

	•		we may encounter difficulties or unforeseen expenditures in integrating the business, technologies, products, personnel or operations of any company that we acquire, particularly if key personnel of the acquired company decide not to work for us;

	•		an acquisition may disrupt our ongoing business, divert resources, increase our expenses and distract our management;

	•		an acquisition may result in a delay or reduction of customer purchases for both us and the company acquired due to customer uncertainty about continuity and effectiveness of service from either company;

	•		we may encounter difficulties in, or may be unable to, successfully sell any acquired products; and

	•		an acquisition may involve the entry into geographic or business markets in which we have little or no prior experience.

If we fail to maintain an effective system of internal controls, our ability to produce accurate financial statements or comply with applicable regulations could be impaired.

As a public company, we are subject to the reporting requirements of the Exchange Act, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, or the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, and the rules and regulations of The NASDAQ Stock Market. We expect that the requirements of these rules and regulations will continue to increase our legal, accounting and financial compliance costs, make some activities more difficult, time-consuming and costly and place undue strain on our personnel, systems and resources.

The Sarbanes-Oxley Act requires, among other things, that we maintain effective disclosure controls and procedures and internal control over financial reporting. We are continuing to develop and refine our disclosure controls and other procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file with the SEC is recorded, processed,

summarized and reported within the time periods specified in SEC’s rules and forms. Our current controls and any new controls that we develop may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, and the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. Further, weaknesses in our internal controls may be discovered in the future. Any failure to develop or maintain effective controls, or any difficulties encountered in their implementation or improvement, could harm our operating results or cause us to fail to meet our reporting obligations and may result in a restatement of our prior period financial statements. Any failure to implement and maintain effective internal controls also could adversely affect the results of periodic management evaluations and annual auditor attestation reports regarding the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting that we are required to include in our periodic reports filed with the SEC under Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. Ineffective disclosure controls and procedures and internal control over financial reporting could also cause investors to lose confidence in our reported financial and other information, which would likely have a negative effect on the trading price of our common stock.

In order to maintain and improve the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures and internal control over financial reporting, we have expended, and anticipate that we will continue to expend, significant resources and provide significant management oversight, which involve substantial accounting-related costs. Any failure to maintain the adequacy of our internal controls, or consequent inability to produce accurate financial statements on a timely basis, could increase our operating costs and could materially impair our ability to operate our business. In the event that we are not able to continue to demonstrate compliance with Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act in a timely manner, that our internal controls are perceived as inadequate or that we are unable to produce timely or accurate financial statements, investors may lose confidence in our operating results and our stock price could decline. In addition, if we are unable to continue to meet these requirements, we may not be able to remain listed on The NASDAQ Global Market.

We have not yet implemented a complete disaster recovery plan or business continuity plan for our accounting and related information technology systems. Any disaster could therefore materially impair our ability to maintain timely accounting and reporting.

We may not be able to utilize a significant portion of our net operating loss carry-forwards, which could adversely affect our operating results.

Due to prior period losses, we have generated significant federal and state net operating loss carry-forwards, which expire beginning in fiscal 2022 and fiscal 2015, respectively. U.S. federal and state income tax laws limit the amount of these carry-forwards we can utilize upon a greater than 50% cumulative shift of stock ownership over a three-year period, including shifts due to the issuance of additional shares of our common stock, or securities convertible into our common stock. We have previously experienced a greater than 50% shift in our stock ownership, which has limited our ability to use a portion of our net operating loss carry-forwards, and we may experience subsequent shifts in our stock ownership. Accordingly, there is a risk that our ability to use our existing carry-forwards in the future could be further limited and that existing carry-forwards would be unavailable to offset future income tax liabilities, adversely affecting our operating results.

Governmental export or import controls could subject us to liability or limit our ability to compete in foreign markets.

Our products incorporate encryption technology and may be exported outside the U.S. only if we obtain an export license or qualify for an export license exception. Compliance with applicable regulatory requirements regarding the export of our products, including new releases of our products, may create delays in the introduction of our products in international markets, prevent our customers with international operations from deploying our products throughout their global systems or, in some cases, prevent the export of our products to some countries altogether. In addition, various countries regulate the import of our appliance-based products and have enacted laws that could limit our ability to distribute products or could limit our customers’ ability to implement our products in those countries. Any new export or import restrictions, new legislation or shifting approaches in the enforcement or scope of existing regulations, or in the countries, persons or technologies targeted by such regulations, could result in decreased use of our products by existing customers with international operations, declining adoption of our products by new customers with international operations and decreased revenues. If we fail to comply with export and import regulations, we may be denied export privileges, be subjected to fines or other penalties and our products may be denied entry into other countries.

Risks Related to Ownership of Our Common Stock

Our stock price may be volatile or may decline regardless of our operating performance.

The trading prices of the securities of technology companies have been highly volatile. The market price of our common stock may fluctuate significantly in response to numerous factors, many of which are beyond our control, including:

	•		actual or anticipated fluctuations in our operating results;

	•		the financial projections we may provide to the public, any changes in these projections or our failure to meet these projections;

	•		failure of securities analysts to initiate or maintain coverage of us, changes in financial estimates by any securities analysts who follow our company, or our failure to meet these estimates or the expectations of investors;

	•		ratings or other changes by any securities analysts who follow our company or our industry;

	•		announcements by us or our competitors of significant technical innovations, acquisitions, strategic partnerships, joint ventures or capital commitments;

	•		changes in operating performance and stock market valuations of other technology companies generally, or those in our industry in particular;

	•		price and volume fluctuations in the overall stock market, including as a result of trends in the economy as a whole, such as the recent and continuing unprecedented volatility in the financial markets;

	•		lawsuits threatened or filed against us; and

	•		other events or factors, including those resulting from war, incidents of terrorism or responses to these events.

In addition, the stock markets, and in particular The NASDAQ Global Market on which our common stock is listed, have experienced extreme price and volume fluctuations that have affected and continue to affect the market prices of equity securities of many companies, particularly technology companies. Broad market fluctuations such as these may have and could continue to adversely affect the market price of our common stock. Even prior to the recent unprecedented volatility in the financial markets, stock prices of many technology companies had fluctuated in a manner unrelated or disproportionate to the operating performance of those companies. In the past, stockholders have instituted securities class action litigation following periods of market volatility. If we were to become involved in securities litigation, it could subject us to substantial costs, divert resources and the attention of management from our business and adversely affect our business, operating results and financial condition.

If securities or industry analysts do not publish research or publish inaccurate or unfavorable research about our business, our stock price and trading volume could decline.

The trading market for our common stock will depend in part on the research and reports that securities or industry analysts publish about us or our business. We currently have limited, and may not obtain additional, research coverage by securities analysts, and industry analysts that currently cover us may cease to do so. If no securities analysts commence coverage of our company, or if industry analysts cease coverage of our company, the trading price for our stock would be negatively impacted. In the event we obtain securities analyst coverage, if one or more of the analysts who cover us or our industry downgrade our stock or the stock of other companies in our industry, or publish inaccurate or unfavorable research about our business or industry, our stock price would likely decline. If one or more of these analysts cease coverage of our company or fail to publish reports on us regularly, demand for our stock could decrease, which might cause our stock price and trading volume to decline.

Delaware law, provisions in our restated certificate of incorporation and amended and restated bylaws and the concentration of our ownership could make a merger, tender offer or proxy contest difficult, thereby depressing the trading price of our common stock.

We are a Delaware corporation and the anti-takeover provisions of the Delaware General Corporation Law may discourage, delay or prevent a change in control by prohibiting us from engaging in a business combination with an interested stockholder for a period of three years after the person becomes an interested stockholder, even if a change of control would be beneficial to our existing stockholders. In addition, our restated certificate of incorporation and amended and restated bylaws contain provisions that may make the acquisition of our company more difficult without the approval of our board of directors, including the following:

•

our board of directors is classified into three classes of directors with staggered three-year terms;

	•		only our chief executive officer, our president, our lead independent director, a majority of our board of directors or our chairman of the board, if any (none currently), is authorized to call a special meeting of stockholders;

	•		our stockholders are only able to take action at a meeting of stockholders and not by written consent;

	•		vacancies on our board of directors are able to be filled only by our board of directors and not by stockholders;

	•		directors may be removed from office only for cause;

	•		our restated certificate of incorporation authorizes undesignated preferred stock, the terms of which may be established, and shares of which may be issued, without stockholder approval; and

	•		advance notice procedures will apply for stockholders to nominate candidates for election as directors or to bring matters before an annual meeting of stockholders.

In addition, as of September 1, 2009 (including options exercisable by those holders within 60 days of that date), our directors and executive officers, together with their affiliates, beneficially own in the aggregate 23.7% of our outstanding common stock. Further, holders that together with their affiliates hold 5% or more of our common stock, but who are not affiliated with our directors and executive officers, beneficially own in the aggregate an additional 35.0% of our outstanding common stock as of September 1, 2009. As a result, our directors and officers and their affiliates, collectively, or our largest stockholders, acting together, may be able to practically prevent or impede a merger, consolidation or sale of all or substantially all of our assets.

ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS

Use of Proceeds from Public Offering of Common Stock

The Form S-1 Registration Statement (Registration No. 333-145974) relating to our IPO was declared effective by the SEC on February 14, 2008, and the offering commenced that day. Morgan Stanley & Co. Incorporated acted as the sole book-running manager for the offering, and Lehman Brothers Inc., Wachovia Capital Markets, LLC and RBC Capital Markets Corporation acted as co-managers of the offering.

The net proceeds to us of our IPO after deducting underwriters’ discounts and offering expenses were $45.9 million. Through July 31, 2009, we did not use any of the net proceeds. We expect to use the net proceeds for general corporate purposes, including working capital and potential capital expenditures and acquisitions. Although we may also use a portion of the net proceeds for the acquisition of, or investment in, companies, technologies, products or assets that complement our business, we have no present understandings, commitments or agreements to enter into any acquisitions or make any investments.

Our management will retain broad discretion in the allocation and use of the net proceeds of our IPO, and investors will be relying on the judgment of our management regarding the application of the net proceeds. Pending specific utilization of the net proceeds as described above, we have invested the net proceeds of the offering in short-term, interest-bearing obligations. The goal with respect to the investment of the net proceeds will be capital preservation and liquidity so that such funds are readily available to fund our operations.

ITEM 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES

Not applicable.

ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS

Not applicable.

ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION

Not applicable.

ITEM 6. EXHIBITS


Exhibit
Number		Exhibit Description
10.01		Fiscal Year 2010 Management Bonus Plan.

10.02		Sales Commission Plan – FY 2010 (Kevin P. Mosher).

31.01		Certification of Principal Executive Officer Pursuant to Securities Exchange Act Rule 13a-14(a).

31.02		Certification of Principal Financial Officer Pursuant to Securities Exchange Act Rule 13a-14(a).

32.01		Certification of Principal Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and Securities Exchange Act Rule 13a-14(b).*

32.02		Certification of Principal Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and Securities Exchange Act Rule 13a-14(b).*


*		This certification is not deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act, or otherwise subject to the liability of that section. Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, except to the extent that ArcSight Inc. specifically incorporates it by reference.

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.


	ARCSIGHT, INC.
Date: September 8, 2009	By:	/s/ Thomas J. Reilly
		Thomas J. Reilly
		President and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)


Date: September 8, 2009	By:	/s/ Stewart Grierson
		Stewart Grierson
		Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)

EXHIBIT INDEX


Exhibit
Number		Exhibit Description
10.01		Fiscal Year 2010 Management Bonus Plan.

10.02		Sales Commission Plan – FY 2010 (Kevin P. Mosher).

31.01		Certification of Principal Executive Officer Pursuant to Securities Exchange Act Rule 13a-14(a).

31.02		Certification of Principal Financial Officer Pursuant to Securities Exchange Act Rule 13a-14(a).

32.01		Certification of Principal Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and Securities Exchange Act Rule 13a-14(b).*

32.02		Certification of Principal Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and Securities Exchange Act Rule 13a-14(b).*


*		This certification is not deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act, or otherwise subject to the liability of that section. Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, except to the extent that ArcSight Inc. specifically incorporates it by reference.