Form 10-Q
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
|
|
|
þ |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2009
OR
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission File Number: 001-13958
THE HARTFORD FINANCIAL SERVICES GROUP, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
|
|
13-3317783
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.) |
One Hartford Plaza, Hartford, Connecticut 06155
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)
(860) 547-5000
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed
by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months
(or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2)
has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter
period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes o No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated
filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of
large accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2
of the Exchange Act.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer þ
|
|
Accelerated filer o
|
|
Non-accelerated filer o
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
|
|
Smaller reporting company o |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
Yes o No þ
As of July 22, 2009, there were outstanding 328,158,459 shares of Common Stock, $0.01 par
value per share, of the registrant.
THE HARTFORD FINANCIAL SERVICES GROUP, INC.
QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q
FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30, 2009
TABLE OF CONTENTS
2
Part I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of
The Hartford Financial Services Group, Inc.
Hartford, Connecticut
We have reviewed the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet of The Hartford Financial
Services Group, Inc. and subsidiaries (the Company) as of June 30, 2009, and the related
condensed consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income (loss) for the three-month
and six-month periods ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, and changes in equity, and cash flows for the
six-month periods ended June 30, 2009 and 2008. These interim financial statements are the
responsibility of the Companys management.
We conducted our reviews in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting
Oversight Board (United States). A review of interim financial information consists principally of
applying analytical procedures and making inquiries of persons responsible for financial and
accounting matters. It is substantially less in scope than an audit conducted in accordance with
the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the objective of
which is the expression of an opinion regarding the financial statements taken as a whole.
Accordingly, we do not express such an opinion.
Based on our reviews, we are not aware of any material modifications that should be made to such
condensed consolidated interim financial statements for them to be in conformity with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
We have previously audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting
Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheet of the Company as of December 31,
2008, and the related consolidated statements of operations, changes in stockholders equity,
comprehensive loss, and cash flows for the year then ended prior to retrospective adjustment for
the adoption of FASB Statement No. 160, Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial
Statements, described in Note 1, (not presented herein); and in our report dated February 11, 2009
(which report includes an explanatory paragraph relating to the Companys change in its method of
accounting and reporting for the fair value measurement of financial instruments in 2008, and
defined benefit pension and other postretirement plans in 2006), we expressed an unqualified
opinion on those consolidated financial statements. We also audited the adjustments described in
Note 1 that were applied to retrospectively adjust the December 31, 2008 consolidated balance sheet
of the Company (not presented herein). In our opinion, such adjustments are appropriate and have
been properly applied to the previously issued consolidated balance sheet in deriving the
accompanying retrospectively adjusted condensed consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2008.
DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
Hartford, Connecticut
July 29, 2009
3
THE HARTFORD FINANCIAL SERVICES GROUP, INC.
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
(In millions, except for per share data) |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
Revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earned premiums |
|
$ |
3,592 |
|
|
$ |
3,891 |
|
|
$ |
7,421 |
|
|
$ |
7,734 |
|
Fee income |
|
|
1,062 |
|
|
|
1,386 |
|
|
|
2,229 |
|
|
|
2,723 |
|
Net investment income (loss): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities available-for-sale and other |
|
|
1,021 |
|
|
|
1,230 |
|
|
|
1,941 |
|
|
|
2,423 |
|
Equity securities, trading |
|
|
2,523 |
|
|
|
1,153 |
|
|
|
1,799 |
|
|
|
(2,425 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net investment income (loss) |
|
|
3,544 |
|
|
|
2,383 |
|
|
|
3,740 |
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net realized capital gains (losses): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other-than-temporary impairment (OTTI) losses |
|
|
(562 |
) |
|
|
(164 |
) |
|
|
(786 |
) |
|
|
(468 |
) |
OTTI losses transferred to other comprehensive income |
|
|
248 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
248 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net OTTI losses recognized in earnings |
|
|
(314 |
) |
|
|
(164 |
) |
|
|
(538 |
) |
|
|
(468 |
) |
Net realized capital losses, excluding net OTTI losses recognized in earnings |
|
|
(367 |
) |
|
|
(118 |
) |
|
|
(59 |
) |
|
|
(1,185 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net realized capital losses |
|
|
(681 |
) |
|
|
(282 |
) |
|
|
(597 |
) |
|
|
(1,653 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other revenues |
|
|
120 |
|
|
|
125 |
|
|
|
238 |
|
|
|
245 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
|
7,637 |
|
|
|
7,503 |
|
|
|
13,031 |
|
|
|
9,047 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefits, losses and expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefits, losses and loss adjustment expenses |
|
|
3,092 |
|
|
|
3,586 |
|
|
|
7,729 |
|
|
|
6,943 |
|
Benefits, losses and loss adjustment expenses returns
credited on International variable annuities |
|
|
2,523 |
|
|
|
1,153 |
|
|
|
1,799 |
|
|
|
(2,425 |
) |
Amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs and
present value of future profits |
|
|
674 |
|
|
|
806 |
|
|
|
2,933 |
|
|
|
1,274 |
|
Insurance operating costs and expenses |
|
|
959 |
|
|
|
1,047 |
|
|
|
1,857 |
|
|
|
1,997 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
119 |
|
|
|
77 |
|
|
|
239 |
|
|
|
144 |
|
Goodwill impairment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other expenses |
|
|
252 |
|
|
|
182 |
|
|
|
441 |
|
|
|
371 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total benefits, losses and expenses |
|
|
7,619 |
|
|
|
6,851 |
|
|
|
15,030 |
|
|
|
8,304 |
|
Income (loss) before income taxes |
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
652 |
|
|
|
(1,999 |
) |
|
|
743 |
|
Income tax expense (benefit) |
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
109 |
|
|
|
(775 |
) |
|
|
55 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
(15 |
) |
|
$ |
543 |
|
|
$ |
(1,224 |
) |
|
$ |
688 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock dividends |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) available to common shareholders |
|
$ |
(18 |
) |
|
$ |
543 |
|
|
$ |
(1,227 |
) |
|
$ |
688 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings (Loss) per common share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
(0.06 |
) |
|
$ |
1.74 |
|
|
$ |
(3.80 |
) |
|
$ |
2.20 |
|
Diluted |
|
$ |
(0.06 |
) |
|
$ |
1.73 |
|
|
$ |
(3.80 |
) |
|
$ |
2.19 |
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding |
|
|
325.4 |
|
|
|
311.7 |
|
|
|
323.1 |
|
|
|
312.7 |
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding and
dilutive potential common shares |
|
|
325.4 |
|
|
|
313.1 |
|
|
|
323.1 |
|
|
|
314.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash dividends declared per common share |
|
$ |
0.05 |
|
|
$ |
0.53 |
|
|
$ |
0.10 |
|
|
$ |
1.06 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
4
THE HARTFORD FINANCIAL SERVICES GROUP, INC.
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
(In millions, except for share and per share data) |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed maturities, available-for-sale, at fair value (amortized cost of $76,196 and $78,238) |
|
$ |
64,868 |
|
|
$ |
65,112 |
|
Equity securities, trading, at fair value (cost of $32,889 and $35,278) |
|
|
30,813 |
|
|
|
30,820 |
|
Equity securities, available-for-sale, at fair value (cost of $1,518 and $1,554) |
|
|
1,308 |
|
|
|
1,458 |
|
Mortgage loans on real estate |
|
|
6,522 |
|
|
|
6,469 |
|
Policy loans, at outstanding balance |
|
|
2,204 |
|
|
|
2,208 |
|
Limited partnerships and other alternative investments |
|
|
1,838 |
|
|
|
2,295 |
|
Other investments |
|
|
1,107 |
|
|
|
1,723 |
|
Short-term investments |
|
|
12,701 |
|
|
|
10,022 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total investments |
|
|
121,361 |
|
|
|
120,107 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash |
|
|
2,558 |
|
|
|
1,811 |
|
Premiums receivable and agents balances |
|
|
3,510 |
|
|
|
3,604 |
|
Reinsurance recoverables |
|
|
5,848 |
|
|
|
6,357 |
|
Deferred policy acquisition costs and present value of future profits |
|
|
11,780 |
|
|
|
13,248 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
5,321 |
|
|
|
5,239 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
1,204 |
|
|
|
1,060 |
|
Property and equipment, net |
|
|
1,024 |
|
|
|
1,075 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
3,148 |
|
|
|
4,898 |
|
Separate account assets |
|
|
133,946 |
|
|
|
130,184 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
289,700 |
|
|
$ |
287,583 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reserve for future policy benefits and unpaid losses and loss adjustment expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and casualty |
|
$ |
21,902 |
|
|
$ |
21,933 |
|
Life |
|
|
18,153 |
|
|
|
16,747 |
|
Other policyholder funds and benefits payable |
|
|
49,257 |
|
|
|
53,753 |
|
Other policyholder funds and benefits payable International variable annuities |
|
|
30,793 |
|
|
|
30,799 |
|
Unearned premiums |
|
|
5,333 |
|
|
|
5,379 |
|
Short-term debt |
|
|
342 |
|
|
|
398 |
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
5,490 |
|
|
|
5,823 |
|
Consumer notes |
|
|
1,199 |
|
|
|
1,210 |
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
9,823 |
|
|
|
11,997 |
|
Separate account liabilities |
|
|
133,946 |
|
|
|
130,184 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
276,238 |
|
|
|
278,223 |
|
Commitments and Contingencies (Note 9) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, $0.01 par value 50,000,000 shares authorized, 3,400,000 and 6,048,387 shares issued, liquidation preference $1,000 and $0.02 per share |
|
|
2,921 |
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $0.01 par value 1,500,000,000 and 750,000,000 shares authorized,
355,392,612 and 329,920,310 shares issued |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
8,190 |
|
|
|
7,569 |
|
Retained earnings |
|
|
10,991 |
|
|
|
11,336 |
|
Treasury stock, at cost 28,663,675 and 29,341,378 shares |
|
|
(2,054 |
) |
|
|
(2,120 |
) |
Accumulated other comprehensive loss, net of tax |
|
|
(6,610 |
) |
|
|
(7,520 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
13,442 |
|
|
|
9,268 |
|
Noncontrolling interest |
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
92 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total equity |
|
|
13,462 |
|
|
|
9,360 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and equity |
|
$ |
289,700 |
|
|
$ |
287,583 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
5
THE HARTFORD FINANCIAL SERVICES GROUP, INC.
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Changes in Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
(In millions, except for share data) |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
Preferred Stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of period |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Issuance of shares to U.S. Treasury |
|
|
2,920 |
|
|
|
|
|
Accretion of preferred stock discount on issuance to U.S. Treasury |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of period |
|
|
2,921 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional Paid-in Capital |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of period |
|
|
7,569 |
|
|
|
6,627 |
|
Issuance of warrants to U.S. Treasury |
|
|
480 |
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of shares under discretionary equity issuance plan |
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of shares under incentive and stock compensation plans |
|
|
(50 |
) |
|
|
(43 |
) |
Reclassification of warrants from other liabilities to equity and extension of warrants term |
|
|
186 |
|
|
|
|
|
Tax (expense) benefit on employee stock options and awards |
|
|
(11 |
) |
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of period |
|
|
8,190 |
|
|
|
6,591 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retained Earnings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of period, before cumulative effect of accounting change, net of tax |
|
|
11,336 |
|
|
|
14,686 |
|
Cumulative effect of accounting change, net of tax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of period, as adjusted |
|
|
11,336 |
|
|
|
14,683 |
|
Net income (loss) |
|
|
(1,224 |
) |
|
|
688 |
|
Cumulative effect of accounting change, net of tax |
|
|
912 |
|
|
|
|
|
Accretion of preferred stock discount on issuance to U.S. Treasury |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Dividends on preferred stock |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Dividends declared on common stock |
|
|
(30 |
) |
|
|
(332 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of period |
|
|
10,991 |
|
|
|
15,039 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Treasury Stock, at Cost |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of period |
|
|
(2,120 |
) |
|
|
(1,254 |
) |
Treasury stock acquired |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(871 |
) |
Issuance of shares under incentive and stock compensation plans from treasury stock |
|
|
69 |
|
|
|
113 |
|
Return of shares under incentive and stock compensation plans to treasury stock |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
(17 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of period |
|
|
(2,054 |
) |
|
|
(2,029 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss, Net of Tax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of period |
|
|
(7,520 |
) |
|
|
(858 |
) |
Cumulative effect of accounting change, net of tax |
|
|
(912 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Total other comprehensive income (loss) |
|
|
1,822 |
|
|
|
(1,922 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of period |
|
|
(6,610 |
) |
|
|
(2,780 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Stockholders Equity |
|
|
13,442 |
|
|
|
16,824 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noncontrolling Interest (Note 13) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of period |
|
|
92 |
|
|
|
92 |
|
Change in noncontrolling interest ownership |
|
|
(65 |
) |
|
|
57 |
|
Noncontrolling loss |
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
(22 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of period |
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
127 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Equity |
|
$ |
13,462 |
|
|
$ |
16,951 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding Preferred Shares (in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of period |
|
|
6,048 |
|
|
|
|
|
Conversion of preferred to common shares |
|
|
(6,048 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Issuance of shares to U.S. Treasury |
|
|
3,400 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of period |
|
|
3,400 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding Common Shares (in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of period |
|
|
300,579 |
|
|
|
313,842 |
|
Treasury stock acquired |
|
|
(15 |
) |
|
|
(11,675 |
) |
Conversion of preferred to common shares |
|
|
24,194 |
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of shares under discretionary equity issuance plan |
|
|
1,301 |
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of shares under incentive and stock compensation plans |
|
|
854 |
|
|
|
1,220 |
|
Return of shares under incentive and stock compensation plans to treasury stock |
|
|
(184 |
) |
|
|
(244 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of period |
|
|
326,729 |
|
|
|
303,143 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
6
THE HARTFORD FINANCIAL SERVICES GROUP, INC.
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
(In millions) |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
Comprehensive Income (Loss) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
(15 |
) |
|
$ |
543 |
|
|
$ |
(1,224 |
) |
|
$ |
688 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive income (loss) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in net unrealized loss on securities |
|
|
2,373 |
|
|
|
(420 |
) |
|
|
2,340 |
|
|
|
(2,026 |
) |
Other-than-temporary impairment losses transferred to Other Comprehensive Income |
|
|
(125 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(125 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Change in net gain/loss on cash-flow hedging instruments |
|
|
(320 |
) |
|
|
(76 |
) |
|
|
(368 |
) |
|
|
14 |
|
Change in foreign currency translation adjustments |
|
|
164 |
|
|
|
(68 |
) |
|
|
(45 |
) |
|
|
74 |
|
Amortization of prior service cost and actuarial net losses included in net periodic benefit costs |
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other comprehensive income (loss) |
|
|
2,103 |
|
|
|
(555 |
) |
|
|
1,822 |
|
|
|
(1,922 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income (loss) |
|
$ |
2,088 |
|
|
$ |
(12 |
) |
|
$ |
598 |
|
|
$ |
(1,234 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
7
THE HARTFORD FINANCIAL SERVICES GROUP, INC.
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
(In millions) |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
Operating Activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
(1,224 |
) |
|
$ |
688 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs and present value of future profits |
|
|
2,933 |
|
|
|
1,274 |
|
Additions to deferred policy acquisition costs and present value of future profits
Change in: |
|
|
(1,450 |
) |
|
|
(1,903 |
) |
Reserve for future policy benefits and unpaid losses and loss adjustment expenses and unearned premiums |
|
|
1,333 |
|
|
|
576 |
|
Reinsurance recoverables |
|
|
(111 |
) |
|
|
78 |
|
Receivables and other assets |
|
|
249 |
|
|
|
399 |
|
Payables and accruals |
|
|
(389 |
) |
|
|
(690 |
) |
Accrued and deferred income taxes |
|
|
(343 |
) |
|
|
(68 |
) |
Net realized capital losses |
|
|
597 |
|
|
|
1,653 |
|
Net receipts to investment contracts related to policyholder funds -International variable annuities |
|
|
(892 |
) |
|
|
(1,290 |
) |
Net decrease in equity securities, trading |
|
|
885 |
|
|
|
1,235 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
259 |
|
|
|
476 |
|
Goodwill impairment |
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other, net |
|
|
107 |
|
|
|
(167 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
1,986 |
|
|
|
2,261 |
|
Investing Activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from the sale/maturity/prepayment of: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed maturities, available-for-sale |
|
|
33,229 |
|
|
|
12,595 |
|
Equity securities, available-for-sale |
|
|
482 |
|
|
|
144 |
|
Mortgage loans |
|
|
297 |
|
|
|
214 |
|
Partnerships |
|
|
239 |
|
|
|
107 |
|
Derivatives |
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
|
|
Payments for the purchase of: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed maturities, available-for-sale |
|
|
(35,015 |
) |
|
|
(14,455 |
) |
Equity securities, available-for-sale |
|
|
(251 |
) |
|
|
(496 |
) |
Mortgage loans |
|
|
(214 |
) |
|
|
(686 |
) |
Partnerships |
|
|
(136 |
) |
|
|
(402 |
) |
Derivatives |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(219 |
) |
Proceeds from business sold |
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase price of businesses acquired |
|
|
(15 |
) |
|
|
(94 |
) |
Change in policy loans, net |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
(85 |
) |
Change in payables for collateral under securities lending, net |
|
|
(2,262 |
) |
|
|
(199 |
) |
Change in all other securities, net |
|
|
107 |
|
|
|
(556 |
) |
Additions to property and equipment, net |
|
|
(58 |
) |
|
|
(185 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used for investing activities |
|
|
(3,557 |
) |
|
|
(4,317 |
) |
Financing Activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits and other additions to investment and universal life-type contracts |
|
|
7,323 |
|
|
|
11,345 |
|
Withdrawals and other deductions from investment and universal life-type contracts |
|
|
(11,516 |
) |
|
|
(13,694 |
) |
Net transfers from separate accounts related to investment and universal life-type contracts |
|
|
3,646 |
|
|
|
3,725 |
|
Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,487 |
|
Payments on capital lease obligations |
|
|
(24 |
) |
|
|
(37 |
) |
Change in short-term debt |
|
|
(375 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of consumer notes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
304 |
|
Repayments at maturity or settlement of consumer notes |
|
|
(11 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of preferred stock and warrants to U.S. Treasury |
|
|
3,400 |
|
|
|
|
|
Net proceeds from issuance of shares under discretionary equity issuance plan |
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of shares under incentive and stock compensation plans |
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
34 |
|
Excess tax benefit on stock-based compensation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
Treasury stock acquired |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(811 |
) |
Return of shares under incentive and stock compensation plans to treasury stock |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
(17 |
) |
Dividends paid on preferred stock |
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Dividends paid on common stock |
|
|
(115 |
) |
|
|
(336 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by financing activities |
|
|
2,338 |
|
|
|
2,002 |
|
Foreign exchange rate effect on cash |
|
|
(20 |
) |
|
|
127 |
|
Net increase in cash |
|
|
747 |
|
|
|
73 |
|
Cash beginning of period |
|
|
1,811 |
|
|
|
2,011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash end of period |
|
$ |
2,558 |
|
|
$ |
2,084 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental Disclosure of Cash Flow Information |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Cash Paid (Received) During the Period For: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income taxes |
|
$ |
(468 |
) |
|
$ |
65 |
|
Interest |
|
$ |
243 |
|
|
$ |
128 |
|
See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
8
THE
HARTFORD FINANCIAL SERVICES GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollar amounts in millions, except for per share data, unless otherwise stated)
(Unaudited)
1. Basis of Presentation and Accounting Policies
Basis of Presentation
The Hartford Financial Services Group, Inc. is a financial holding company for a group of
subsidiaries that provide investment products and life and property and casualty insurance to both
individual and business customers in the United States and internationally (collectively, The
Hartford or the Company). During the second quarter of 2009, the Company acquired Federal Trust
Corporation and became a savings and loan holding company, see Note 16 for further information on
the acquisition.
The condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared on the basis of accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States of America (U.S. GAAP), which differ
materially from the accounting practices prescribed by various insurance regulatory authorities.
The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements and notes as of June 30, 2009, and for
the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 are unaudited. These financial statements
reflect all adjustments (consisting only of normal accruals) which are, in the opinion of
management, necessary for the fair presentation of the financial position, results of operations
and cash flows for the interim periods. These condensed consolidated financial statements and
notes should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto
included in The Hartfords 2008 Form 10-K Annual Report. The results of operations for the interim
periods should not be considered indicative of the results to be expected for the full year.
Consolidation
The condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of The Hartford Financial
Services Group, Inc., companies in which the Company directly or indirectly has a controlling
financial interest and those variable interest entities in which the Company is the primary
beneficiary. The Company determines if it is the primary beneficiary using both qualitative and
quantitative analyses. Entities in which The Hartford does not have a controlling financial
interest but in which the Company has significant influence over the operating and financing
decisions are reported using the equity method. Material intercompany transactions and balances
between The Hartford and its subsidiaries and affiliates have been eliminated.
Use of Estimates
The preparation of financial statements, in conformity with U.S. GAAP, requires management to make
estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the
disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the
reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ
from those estimates.
The most significant estimates include those used in determining property and casualty reserves,
net of reinsurance; life estimated gross profits used in the valuation and amortization of assets
and liabilities associated with variable annuity and other universal life-type contracts; living
benefits required to be fair valued; valuation of investments and derivative instruments;
evaluation of other-than-temporary impairments on available-for-sale securities; pension and other
postretirement benefit obligations; contingencies relating to corporate litigation and regulatory
matters; and goodwill impairment. Certain of these estimates are particularly sensitive to market
conditions, and deterioration and/or volatility in the worldwide debt or equity markets could have
a material impact on the condensed consolidated financial statements.
Subsequent Events
The Hartford has evaluated events subsequent to June 30, 2009, and through the condensed
consolidated financial statement issuance date of July 29, 2009. The Company has not evaluated
subsequent events after that date for presentation in these condensed consolidated financial
statements.
Significant Accounting Policies
For a description of significant accounting policies, see Note 1 of Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements included in The Hartfords 2008 Form 10-K Annual Report, which, accordingly, should be
read in conjunction with these accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements.
9
THE HARTFORD FINANCIAL SERVICES GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
1. Basis of Presentation and Accounting Policies (continued)
Adoption of New Accounting Standards
Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements, an amendment of ARB No. 51
In December 2007, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Statement of Financial
Accounting Standard (SFAS) No. 160, Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial
Statements (SFAS 160). This statement amends Accounting Research Bulletin No. 51, Consolidated
Financial Statements. Noncontrolling interest refers to the minority interest portion of the
equity of a subsidiary that is not attributable directly or indirectly to a parent. SFAS 160
establishes accounting and reporting standards that require for-profit entities that prepare
consolidated financial statements to: (a) present noncontrolling interests as a component of
equity, separate from the parents equity, (b) separately present the amount of consolidated net
income attributable to noncontrolling interests in the income statement, (c) consistently account
for changes in a parents ownership interests in a subsidiary in which the parent entity has a
controlling financial interest as equity transactions, (d) require an entity to measure at fair
value its remaining interest in a subsidiary that is deconsolidated, and (e) require an entity to
provide sufficient disclosures that identify and clearly distinguish between interests of the
parent and interests of noncontrolling owners. SFAS 160 applies to all for-profit entities that
prepare consolidated financial statements, and affects those for-profit entities that have
outstanding noncontrolling interests in one or more subsidiaries or that deconsolidate a
subsidiary. SFAS 160 is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years,
beginning on or after December 15, 2008 with earlier adoption prohibited. The Company adopted SFAS
160 on January 1, 2009. Upon adoption, the Company reclassified $92 of noncontrolling interest,
recorded in other liabilities, to equity as of January 1, 2008. See the Companys Condensed
Consolidated Statement of Changes in Equity. The adoption of SFAS 160 did not have a material
effect on the Companys Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income
(Loss) and the adoption of SFAS 160 did not impact the Companys accounting for separate account
assets and liabilities. The FASB has added the following topic to the Emerging Issues Task Force
(EITF) agenda, Consideration of an Insurers Accounting for Majority Owned Investments When the
Ownership Is Through a Separate Account. This topic will be discussed at a future EITF meeting.
The FASB has expressed three separate views on the treatment of noncontrolling interest in majority
owned separate accounts, upon implementation of SFAS 160, all of which are acceptable to the United
States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). The Company follows one of these three
acceptable views and currently excludes the noncontrolling interest from its majority owned
separate accounts. The resolution of this EITF agenda item on the Companys accounting for
separate account assets and liabilities is not known at this time.
Fair Value
In April 2009, the FASB issued Financial Statement of Position (FSP) No. FAS 157-4, Determining
Fair Value When the Volume and Level of Activity for the Asset or Liability Have Significantly
Decreased and Identifying Transactions That Are Not Orderly (FSP FAS 157-4). FSP FAS 157-4
clarifies that the measurement objective in determining fair value when the volume and level of
activity for the asset or liability have significantly decreased, is the price that would be
received to sell the asset in an orderly transaction between willing market participants under
current market conditions, and not the value in a hypothetical active market. The FSP includes
additional factors for determining whether there has been a significant decrease in the volume and
level of activity for an asset or liability compared to normal activity for that asset or liability
(or similar assets or liabilities) and provides additional guidance in estimating fair value in
those instances. The FSP requires an entity to base its conclusion about whether a transaction was
not orderly on the weight of the evidence. The FSP expands fair value disclosures for quarterly
financial statements and further requires an entity to disclose any change in valuation techniques,
the related inputs, and the effects resulting from the application of the FSP. FSP FAS 157-4 is
effective for interim and annual reporting periods ending after June 15, 2009. The Company adopted
the provisions of the FSP for its interim reporting period ending on June 30, 2009 and the adoption
did not have a material effect on the Companys condensed consolidated financial statements. See
Note 4 for expanded interim disclosures.
In April 2009, the FASB issued FSP No. FAS 107-1 and APB 28-1, Interim Disclosures about Fair
Value of Financial Instruments (FSP FAS 107-1), which expands the disclosure requirements of
SFAS No. 107, Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments, to interim financial
statements. FSP FAS 107-1 also requires entities to disclose the method(s) and significant
assumptions used to estimate the fair value of financial instruments in the financial statements on
an interim basis and to highlight any changes of the method(s) and significant assumptions from
prior periods. The disclosures in FSP FAS 107-1 are effective for interim reporting periods ending
after June 15, 2009, and are not required for earlier periods that are presented for comparative
purposes at initial adoption. In periods after initial adoption, FSP FAS 107-1 requires comparative
disclosures only for periods ending after initial adoption. The Company adopted the FSP for its
interim reporting period ending on June 30, 2009. See Note 4 for expanded interim disclosures.
10
THE HARTFORD FINANCIAL SERVICES GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
1. Basis of Presentation and Accounting Policies (continued)
Recognition and Presentation of Other-Than-Temporary Impairments
In April 2009, the FASB issued FSP No. FAS 115-2 and FAS 124-2, Recognition and Presentation of
Other-Than-Temporary Impairments (FSP FAS 115-2). FSP FAS 115-2 is effective for interim and
annual reporting periods ending after June 15, 2009. The Company adopted FSP FAS 115-2 for its
interim reporting period ending on June 30, 2009 which modifies the recognition of
other-than-temporary impairment (impairment) losses for debt securities. This new FSP is also
applied to certain equity securities with debt-like characteristics (collectively debt
securities). Effective with the adoption of this FSP, a debt security is deemed to be
other-than-temporarily impaired if the Company intends to sell or it is more likely than not the
Company will be required to sell the security before a recovery in value. If a debt security meets
either of these conditions, a charge is recorded in net realized capital losses equal to the
difference between the fair value and amortized cost basis of the security. For those debt
securities for which the Company does not expect to recover the entire amortized cost basis, the
difference between the securitys amortized cost basis and the fair value is separated into the
portion representing a credit impairment, which is recorded in net realized capital losses, and the
remaining impairment, which is recorded in other comprehensive income (OCI). Generally, the
Company determines a securitys credit impairment as the difference between its amortized cost
basis and its best estimate of expected future cash flows discounted at the securitys effective
yield prior to impairment. The previous amortized cost basis less the impairment recognized in net
realized capital losses becomes the securitys new cost basis. The Company accretes the new cost
basis to the estimated future cash flows over the expected remaining life of the security by
prospectively adjusting the securitys yield, if necessary.
The Company evaluates whether it expects to recover the entire amortized cost basis of a debt
security or if a credit impairment exists, by considering primarily the following factors: (a) the
length of time and extent to which the fair value has been less than the amortized cost of the
security, (b) changes in the financial condition, credit rating and near-term prospects of the
issuer, (c) whether the issuer is current on contractually obligated interest and principal
payments, (d) changes in the financial condition of the securitys underlying collateral and (e)
the payment structure of the security. The Companys best estimate of expected future cash flows
used to determine the credit loss amount is a quantitative and qualitative process that
incorporates information received from third party sources along with certain internal assumptions
and judgments regarding the future performance of the security. The Companys best estimate of
future cash flows includes assumptions including, but not limited to, various performance
indicators, such as historical default and recovery rates, credit ratings, current delinquency
rates, and loan-to-value ratios. In addition, for securitized debt securities, the Company
considers factors including, but not limited to, commercial and residential property value declines
that vary by property type and location and average cumulative collateral loss rates that vary by
vintage year. These assumptions require the use of significant management judgment and include the
probability of issuer default and estimates regarding timing and amount of expected recoveries. In
addition, projections of expected future debt security cash flows may change based upon new
information regarding the performance of the issuer and/or underlying collateral.
FSP FAS 115-2 does not impact the evaluation for impairment for equity securities. For those
equity securities where the decline in the fair value is deemed to be other-than-temporary, a
charge is recorded in net realized capital losses equal to the difference between the fair value
and cost basis of the security. The previous cost basis less the impairment becomes the securitys
new cost basis. The Company asserts its intent and ability to retain those equity securities
deemed to be temporarily impaired until the price recovers. Once identified, these securities are
systematically restricted from trading unless approved by a committee of investment and accounting
professionals (the committee). The committee will only authorize the sale of these securities
based on predefined criteria that relate to events that could not have been reasonably foreseen.
Examples of the criteria include, but are not limited to, the deterioration in the issuers
financial condition, security price declines, a change in regulatory requirements or a major
business combination or major disposition.
The primary factors considered in evaluating whether an impairment exists for an equity security
include, but are not limited to: (a) the length of time and extent to which the fair value has been
less than the cost of the security, (b) changes in the financial condition, credit rating and
near-term prospects of the issuer, (c) whether the issuer is current on contractually obligated
payments and (d) the intent and ability of the Company to retain the investment for a period of
time sufficient to allow for recovery.
The FSP also expands and increases the frequency of existing disclosures about other-than-temporary
impairments for debt and equity securities. As a result of the adoption of FSP FAS 115-2, the
Company recognized a $912, net of tax and deferred acquisition costs, increase to Retained Earnings
with an offsetting decrease in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (AOCI). See the Companys
Condensed Consolidated Statement of Changes in Equity and Consolidated Statements of Operations and
Comprehensive Loss. See Notes 4 and 5 for expanded interim disclosures.
11
THE HARTFORD FINANCIAL SERVICES GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
1. Basis of Presentation and Accounting Policies (continued)
Subsequent Events
In May 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 165, Subsequent Events (SFAS 165). SFAS 165 establishes
principles and disclosure requirements for events that occur after the balance sheet date but
before financial statements are issued or are available to be issued. In particular, the Statement
sets forth (a) the period after the balance sheet date during which management of a reporting
entity shall evaluate events or transactions that may occur for potential recognition or disclosure
in the financial statements, (b) the circumstances under which an entity shall recognize events or
transactions occurring after the balance sheet date in its financial statements, and (c) the
disclosures that an entity shall make about events or transactions that occurred after the balance
sheet date. An entity shall disclose the date through which subsequent events have been evaluated,
as well as whether that date is the date the financial statements were issued or the date the
financial statements were available to be issued. SFAS 165 is effective for interim or annual
financial periods ending after June 15, 2009. The Company adopted SFAS 165 for its interim
reporting period ending on June 30, 2009. See Basis of Presentation within this Note 1 for
expanded interim disclosures.
Future Adoption of New Accounting Standards
Accounting for Transfers of Financial Assets
In June 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 166, Accounting for Transfers of Financial Assets, an
Amendment of FASB Statement No. 140 (SFAS 166). SFAS 166 amends the derecognition guidance in
Statement 140 and eliminates the concept of a qualifying special-purpose entities (QSPEs). SFAS
166 is effective for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after November 15, 2009. Early
adoption of SFAS 166 is prohibited. The Company will adopt SFAS 166 on January 1, 2010 and has not
yet determined the effect of the adoption on its consolidated financial statements.
Amendments to FASB Interpretation No. 46(R)
In June 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 167, Amendments to FASB Interpretation No. 46(R) (SFAS
167) which amends the consolidation guidance applicable to variable interest entities (VIEs).
An entity would consolidate a VIE, as the primary beneficiary, when the entity has both of the
following characteristics: (a) The power to direct the activities of a VIE that most significantly
impact the entitys economic performance and (b) The obligation to absorb losses of the entity that
could potentially be significant to the VIE or the right to receive benefits from the entity that
could potentially be significant to the VIE. Ongoing reassessment of whether an enterprise is the
primary beneficiary of a VIE is required. SFAS 167 amends interpretation 46(R) to eliminate the
quantitative approach previously required for determining the primary beneficiary of a VIE. This
Statement is effective for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after November 15, 2009. The
Company will adopt SFAS 167 on January 1, 2010 and has not yet determined the effect of the
adoption on its consolidated financial statements.
FASB Accounting Standards Codification
In June 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 168, The FASB Accounting Standards Codification and the
Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (SFAS 168). This standard identifies the
sources of accounting principles and the framework for selecting the principles used in the
preparation of financial statements that are presented in conformity with U.S. GAAP. The Statement
establishes the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (Codification) as the single source of
authoritative accounting principles recognized by the FASB in the preparation of financial
statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP. Codification does not create new accounting and reporting
guidance rather it reorganizes U.S. GAAP pronouncements into approximately 90 topics within a
consistent structure. All guidance contained in the Codification carries an equal level of
authority. Relevant portions of authoritative content, issued by the SEC, for SEC registrants,
have been included in the Codification. After the effective date of this Statement, all
nongrandfathered, non-SEC accounting literature not included in the Codification is superseded and
deemed nonauthoritative. This Statement is effective for financial statements issued for interim
and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. The Company will adopt SFAS 168 on September
30, 2009 and will update all disclosures to reference Codification in its September 30, 2009
quarterly report.
12
THE HARTFORD FINANCIAL SERVICES GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
1. Basis of Presentation and Accounting Policies (continued)
Income Taxes
The effective tax rate for the three months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 was 183% and 17%,
respectively. The effective tax rate for the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 was 39% and
7%, respectively. The principal causes of the difference between the effective rate and the U.S.
statutory rate of 35% were tax-exempt interest earned on invested assets and the separate account
dividends received deduction (DRD), offset in 2009 by a non-deductible expense related to a
contingent obligation to Allianz as a result of the issuance of warrants to the federal government
in connection with the Companys participation in the Capital Purchase Program.
The separate account DRD is estimated for the current year using information from the prior
year-end, adjusted for current year equity market performance and other appropriate factors,
including estimated levels of corporate dividend payments. The actual current year DRD can vary
from estimates based on, but not limited to, changes in eligible dividends received by the mutual
funds, amounts of distribution from these mutual funds, amounts of short-term capital gains at the
mutual fund level and the Companys taxable income before the DRD. Given recent financial markets
volatility, the Company is reviewing its DRD computations on a quarterly basis. The Company
recorded benefits related to the separate account DRD of $37 and $67 in the three months ended June
30, 2009 and 2008, and $75 and $108 in the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
The Companys unrecognized tax benefits decreased by $8 during the six months ended June 30, 2009
as a result of the settlement of the 2002-2003 Internal Revenue Service (IRS) audit, bringing the
total unrecognized tax benefits to $83 as of June 30, 2009. This entire amount, if it were
recognized, would decrease the effective tax rate for the applicable periods.
The Companys federal income tax returns are routinely audited by the IRS. During the first
quarter of 2009, the Company received notification of the approval by the Joint Committee on
Taxation of the results of the 2002 through 2003 examination. As a result, the Company recorded a
tax benefit of $7. The 2004 through 2006 examination began during the second quarter of 2008, and
is expected to close in early 2010. In addition, the Company is working with the IRS on a possible
settlement of a DRD issue related to prior periods which, if settled, may result in the booking of
tax benefits. Such benefits are not expected to be material to the condensed consolidated
statement of operations.
The Companys deferred tax asset valuation allowance has been determined pursuant to the provisions
of FASB SFAS No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes (SFAS 109), including the Companys
estimation of future taxable income, if necessary, and is adequate to reduce the total deferred tax
asset to an amount that will more likely than not be realized. In assessing the need for a
valuation allowance, management considered future reversals of existing taxable temporary
differences, future taxable income exclusive of reversing temporary differences and carryforwards,
and taxable income in prior carry back years as defined in SFAS 109, as well as tax planning
strategies that include holding debt securities with market value losses until recovery, selling
appreciated securities to offset capital losses, and sales of certain corporate assets. Such tax
planning strategies are viewed by management as prudent and feasible and will be implemented if
necessary to realize the deferred tax asset. However, future realized losses on investment securities could
result in the recognition of a valuation allowance, if additional tax planning strategies are not available.
13
THE HARTFORD FINANCIAL SERVICES GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
2. Earnings (Loss) Per Share
The following tables present a reconciliation of net income (loss) and shares used in calculating
basic earnings (loss) per common share to those used in calculating diluted earnings (loss) per
common share.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, 2009 |
|
|
June 30, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Per |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Per |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common |
|
|
|
Net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share |
|
|
Net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share |
|
(Shares in millions) |
|
Loss |
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Loss |
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Amount |
|
Basic Loss per Common Share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss |
|
$ |
(15 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(1,224 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: Preferred stock dividends |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss available to common shareholders |
|
|
(18 |
) |
|
|
325.4 |
|
|
$ |
(0.06 |
) |
|
|
(1,227 |
) |
|
|
323.1 |
|
|
$ |
(3.80 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted Loss per Common Share [1] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Warrants |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock compensation plans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss available to common shareholders plus assumed conversions |
|
$ |
(18 |
) |
|
|
325.4 |
|
|
$ |
(0.06 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,227 |
) |
|
|
323.1 |
|
|
$ |
(3.80 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1] |
|
As a result of the net loss in the three months ended June 30, 2009, the Company is required
to use basic weighted average common shares outstanding in the calculation of the three months
ended June 30, 2009 diluted loss per share, since the inclusion of 0.5 million shares for
warrants and 0.7 million shares for stock compensation plans would have been antidilutive to
the earnings per share calculation. In the absence of the net loss, weighted average common
shares outstanding and dilutive potential common shares would have totaled 326.6 million. |
|
|
|
As a result of the net loss in the six months ended June 30, 2009, the Company is required to
use basic weighted average common shares outstanding in the calculation of the six months ended
June 30, 2009 diluted loss per share, since the inclusion of 0.2 million shares for warrants and
0.7 million shares for stock compensation plans would have been antidilutive to the earnings per
share calculation. In the absence of the net loss, weighted average common shares outstanding
and dilutive potential common shares would have totaled 324.0 million. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, 2008 |
|
|
June 30, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Per |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Per |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common |
|
|
|
Net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share |
|
|
Net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share |
|
(Shares in millions) |
|
Income |
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Income |
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Amount |
|
Basic Earnings per Common Share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income available to common shareholders |
|
$ |
543 |
|
|
|
311.7 |
|
|
$ |
1.74 |
|
|
$ |
688 |
|
|
|
312.7 |
|
|
$ |
2.20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted Earnings per Common Share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock compensation plans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income available to common shareholders plus assumed conversions |
|
$ |
543 |
|
|
|
313.1 |
|
|
$ |
1.73 |
|
|
$ |
688 |
|
|
|
314.4 |
|
|
$ |
2.19 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14
THE HARTFORD FINANCIAL SERVICES GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
3. Segment Information
The Hartford is organized into two major operations: Life and Property & Casualty, each containing
reporting segments. Within the Life and Property & Casualty operations, The Hartford conducts
business principally in eleven reporting segments. Corporate primarily includes the Companys debt
financing and related interest expense, as well as other capital raising activities, banking
operations and certain purchase accounting adjustments.
Life
Life is organized into four groups which are comprised of six reporting segments: The Retail
Products Group (Retail) and Individual Life segments make up the Individual Markets Group. The
Retirement Plans and Group Benefits segments make up the Employer Markets Group. The Institutional
Solutions Group (Institutional) and International segments each make up their own group.
Life charges direct operating expenses to the appropriate segment and allocates the majority of
indirect expenses to the segments based on an intercompany expense arrangement. Inter-segment
revenues primarily occur between Lifes Other category and the reporting segments. These amounts
primarily include interest income on allocated surplus and interest charges on excess separate
account surplus. In addition, during the first quarter of 2009, Institutional and International
entered into a $1.5 billion funding agreement. The resulting interest income and interest expense
in International and Institutional, respectively, are eliminated in consolidation.
Property & Casualty
Property & Casualty is organized into five reporting segments: the underwriting segments of
Personal Lines, Small Commercial, Middle Market and Specialty Commercial (collectively, Ongoing
Operations); and the Other Operations segment. For the three months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008,
AARP accounted for earned premiums of $709 and $691, respectively, in Personal Lines. For both the
six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, AARP accounted for earned premiums of $1.4 billion in
Personal Lines.
Through inter-segment arrangements, Specialty Commercial reimburses Personal Lines, Small
Commercial and Middle Market for losses incurred from uncollectible reinsurance and losses incurred
under certain liability claims. Earned premiums assumed (ceded) under the inter-segment
arrangements were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
Net assumed (ceded) earned premiums under inter-segment arrangements |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Personal Lines |
|
$ |
(2 |
) |
|
$ |
(2 |
) |
|
$ |
(3 |
) |
|
$ |
(3 |
) |
Small Commercial |
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
(12 |
) |
|
|
(15 |
) |
Middle Market |
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
(11 |
) |
|
|
(16 |
) |
Specialty Commercial |
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial Measures and Other Segment Information
For further discussion of the types of products offered by each segment, see Note 3 of Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements included in The Hartfords 2008 Form 10-K Annual Report.
One of the measures of profit or loss used by The Hartfords management in evaluating the
performance of its Life segments is net income. Within Property & Casualty, net income is a
measure of profit or loss used in evaluating the performance of Ongoing Operations and the Other
Operations segment. Within Ongoing Operations, the underwriting segments of Personal Lines, Small
Commercial, Middle Market and Specialty Commercial are evaluated by The Hartfords management
primarily based upon underwriting results. Underwriting results represent premiums earned less
incurred losses, loss adjustment expenses and underwriting expenses. The sum of underwriting
results, net servicing income, net investment income, net realized capital gains and losses, other
expenses, and related income taxes is net income.
15
THE HARTFORD FINANCIAL SERVICES GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
3. Segment Information (continued)
The following table presents revenues by segment.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
Revenues |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Life |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retail |
|
$ |
647 |
|
|
$ |
872 |
|
|
$ |
1,852 |
|
|
$ |
1,048 |
|
Individual Life |
|
|
255 |
|
|
|
285 |
|
|
|
574 |
|
|
|
541 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Individual Markets Group |
|
|
902 |
|
|
|
1,157 |
|
|
|
2,426 |
|
|
|
1,589 |
|
Retirement Plans |
|
|
80 |
|
|
|
170 |
|
|
|
171 |
|
|
|
292 |
|
Group Benefits |
|
|
1,135 |
|
|
|
1,176 |
|
|
|
2,367 |
|
|
|
2,320 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Employer Markets Group |
|
|
1,215 |
|
|
|
1,346 |
|
|
|
2,538 |
|
|
|
2,612 |
|
International [1] |
|
|
222 |
|
|
|
266 |
|
|
|
694 |
|
|
|
413 |
|
Institutional |
|
|
237 |
|
|
|
472 |
|
|
|
440 |
|
|
|
776 |
|
Other [1] |
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
46 |
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
57 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Life segment revenues |
|
|
2,583 |
|
|
|
3,287 |
|
|
|
6,119 |
|
|
|
5,447 |
|
Net investment income (loss) on equity securities, trading [2] |
|
|
2,523 |
|
|
|
1,153 |
|
|
|
1,799 |
|
|
|
(2,425 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Life |
|
|
5,106 |
|
|
|
4,440 |
|
|
|
7,918 |
|
|
|
3,022 |
|
Property & Casualty |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ongoing Operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earned premiums |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Personal Lines |
|
|
985 |
|
|
|
980 |
|
|
|
1,964 |
|
|
|
1,963 |
|
Small Commercial |
|
|
643 |
|
|
|
683 |
|
|
|
1,295 |
|
|
|
1,370 |
|
Middle Market |
|
|
538 |
|
|
|
575 |
|
|
|
1,086 |
|
|
|
1,168 |
|
Specialty Commercial |
|
|
311 |
|
|
|
346 |
|
|
|
643 |
|
|
|
696 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ongoing Operations earned premiums |
|
|
2,477 |
|
|
|
2,584 |
|
|
|
4,988 |
|
|
|
5,197 |
|
Net investment income |
|
|
239 |
|
|
|
334 |
|
|
|
424 |
|
|
|
644 |
|
Other revenues [3] |
|
|
120 |
|
|
|
125 |
|
|
|
238 |
|
|
|
245 |
|
Net realized capital losses |
|
|
(80 |
) |
|
|
(53 |
) |
|
|
(369 |
) |
|
|
(187 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Ongoing Operations |
|
|
2,756 |
|
|
|
2,990 |
|
|
|
5,281 |
|
|
|
5,899 |
|
Other Operations |
|
|
44 |
|
|
|
61 |
|
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
99 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Property & Casualty |
|
|
2,800 |
|
|
|
3,051 |
|
|
|
5,331 |
|
|
|
5,998 |
|
Corporate |
|
|
(269 |
) |
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
(218 |
) |
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
$ |
7,637 |
|
|
$ |
7,503 |
|
|
$ |
13,031 |
|
|
$ |
9,047 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1] |
|
Included in Internationals revenues for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 are $19 and $30, respectively, of investment income from an inter-segment funding agreement with Institutional. This investment income is eliminated in Life Other. |
|
[2] |
|
Management does not include net investment income (loss) and the mark-to-market effects of equity securities, trading, supporting the international variable annuity business in its segment revenues since corresponding amounts are credited to
policyholders. |
|
[3] |
|
Represents servicing revenue. |
16
THE HARTFORD FINANCIAL SERVICES GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
3. Segment Information (continued)
The following table presents net income (loss) by segment. Underwriting results are presented for
the Personal Lines, Small Commercial, Middle Market and Specialty Commercial segments, while net
income (loss) is presented for each of Lifes reporting segments, total Property & Casualty,
Ongoing Operations, Other Operations and Corporate.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
Net Income (Loss) |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Life |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retail |
|
$ |
192 |
|
|
$ |
170 |
|
|
$ |
(552 |
) |
|
$ |
93 |
|
Individual Life |
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Individual Markets Group |
|
|
208 |
|
|
|
200 |
|
|
|
(554 |
) |
|
|
143 |
|
Retirement Plans |
|
|
(40 |
) |
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
(128 |
) |
|
|
26 |
|
Group Benefits |
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
62 |
|
|
|
83 |
|
|
|
108 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Employer Markets Group |
|
|
(26 |
) |
|
|
93 |
|
|
|
(45 |
) |
|
|
134 |
|
International [1] |
|
|
119 |
|
|
|
72 |
|
|
|
(174 |
) |
|
|
80 |
|
Institutional [1] |
|
|
(66 |
) |
|
|
(30 |
) |
|
|
(240 |
) |
|
|
(150 |
) |
Other [1] |
|
|
(59 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(69 |
) |
|
|
(28 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Life |
|
|
176 |
|
|
|
334 |
|
|
|
(1,082 |
) |
|
|
179 |
|
Property & Casualty |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ongoing Operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Underwriting results |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Personal Lines |
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
65 |
|
|
|
123 |
|
Small Commercial |
|
|
74 |
|
|
|
69 |
|
|
|
161 |
|
|
|
188 |
|
Middle Market |
|
|
56 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
125 |
|
|
|
58 |
|
Specialty Commercial |
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
59 |
|
|
|
57 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Ongoing Operations underwriting results |
|
|
156 |
|
|
|
108 |
|
|
|
410 |
|
|
|
426 |
|
Net servicing income [2] |
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
Net investment income |
|
|
239 |
|
|
|
334 |
|
|
|
424 |
|
|
|
644 |
|
Net realized capital losses |
|
|
(80 |
) |
|
|
(53 |
) |
|
|
(369 |
) |
|
|
(187 |
) |
Other expenses |
|
|
(48 |
) |
|
|
(65 |
) |
|
|
(98 |
) |
|
|
(122 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income
before income taxes |
|
|
274 |
|
|
|
332 |
|
|
|
382 |
|
|
|
768 |
|
Income tax expense |
|
|
(52 |
) |
|
|
(86 |
) |
|
|
(49 |
) |
|
|
(210 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ongoing Operations |
|
|
222 |
|
|
|
246 |
|
|
|
333 |
|
|
|
558 |
|
Other Operations |
|
|
(49 |
) |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
(48 |
) |
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Property & Casualty |
|
|
173 |
|
|
|
249 |
|
|
|
285 |
|
|
|
575 |
|
Corporate |
|
|
(364 |
) |
|
|
(40 |
) |
|
|
(427 |
) |
|
|
(66 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
(15 |
) |
|
$ |
543 |
|
|
$ |
(1,224 |
) |
|
$ |
688 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1] |
|
Included in net income (loss) of International and Institutional is
investment income and interest expense, respectively, for the three
and six months ended June 30, 2009 of $19 and $30, respectively, on an
inter-segment funding agreement. This investment income and interest
expense is eliminated in Life Other. |
|
[2] |
|
Net of expenses related to service business. |
17
THE HARTFORD FINANCIAL SERVICES GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
4. Fair Value Measurements
The following financial instruments are carried at fair value in the Companys condensed
consolidated financial statements: fixed maturities and equity securities, available-for-sale
(AFS), short-term investments, freestanding and embedded derivatives, and separate account
assets. These fair value disclosures include the fair value measurement and disclosure
requirements of SFAS 157 and related FSPs including FSP FAS 157-4 and FSP FAS 107-1.
The following section applies the SFAS 157 fair value hierarchy and disclosure requirements for the
Companys financial instruments that are carried at fair value. SFAS 157 establishes a fair value
hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs in the valuation techniques used to measure fair value into
three broad Levels (Level 1, 2 or 3).
|
|
|
Level 1
|
|
Observable inputs that reflect quoted prices for identical assets
or liabilities in active markets that the Company has the ability
to access at the measurement date. Level 1 securities include
highly liquid U.S. Treasury securities, money market funds,
certain mortgage backed securities, and exchange traded equity and
derivative securities. |
|
|
|
Level 2
|
|
Observable inputs, other than quoted prices included in Level 1,
for the asset or liability or prices for similar assets and
liabilities. Most debt securities and preferred stocks are model
priced by vendors using observable inputs and are classified
within Level 2. Also included in the Level 2 category are
derivative instruments that are priced using models with
significant observable market inputs, including interest rate,
foreign currency and certain credit swap contracts and no or
insignificant unobservable market inputs. |
|
|
|
Level 3
|
|
Valuations that are derived from techniques in which one or more
of the significant inputs are unobservable (including assumptions
about risk). Level 3 securities include less liquid securities
such as highly structured and/or lower quality asset-backed
securities (ABS), commercial mortgage-backed securities
(CMBS), residential mortgage-backed securities (RMBS)
primarily backed by sub-prime loans, and private placement debt
and equity securities. Collateralized debt obligations (CDOs)
included in Level 3 primarily represent commercial real estate
(CRE) CDOs and collateralized loan obligations (CLOs) which
are primarily priced by independent brokers due to the illiquidity
of this sector. Embedded derivatives and complex derivatives
securities, including equity derivatives, longer dated interest
rate swaps and certain complex credit derivatives are also
included in Level 3. Because Level 3 fair values, by their
nature, contain unobservable market inputs as there is little or
no observable market for these assets and liabilities,
considerable judgment is used to determine the SFAS 157 Level 3
fair values. Level 3 fair values represent the Companys best
estimate of an amount that could be realized in a current market
exchange absent actual market exchanges. |
In many situations, inputs used to measure the fair value of an asset or liability position may
fall into different levels of the fair value hierarchy. In these situations, the Company will
determine the level in which the fair value falls based upon the lowest level input that is
significant to the determination of the fair value. In most cases, both observable (e.g., changes
in interest rates) and unobservable (e.g., changes in risk assumptions) inputs are used in the
determination of fair values that the Company has classified within Level 3. Consequently, these
values and the related gains and losses are based upon both observable and unobservable inputs. The
Companys fixed maturities included in Level 3 are classified as such as they are primarily priced
by independent brokers and/or within illiquid markets. Corporate securities included in Level 3
primarily relate to private placement securities which are thinly traded and priced using a pricing
matrix which includes significant non-observable inputs. RMBS included in Level 3 primarily
represent sub-prime and Alt-A securities which are classified as Level 3 due to the lack of
liquidity in the market.
18
THE HARTFORD FINANCIAL SERVICES GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
4. Fair Value Measurements (continued)
These disclosures provide information as to the extent to which the Company uses fair value to
measure financial instruments and information about the inputs used to value those financial
instruments to allow users to assess the relative reliability of the measurements. The following
tables present assets and (liabilities) carried at fair value by SFAS 157 Hierarchy Level.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted Prices |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
in Active |
|
|
Significant |
|
|
Significant |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Markets for |
|
|
Observable |
|
|
Unobservable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Identical Assets |
|
|
Inputs |
|
|
Inputs |
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
(Level 1) |
|
|
(Level 2) |
|
|
(Level 3) |
|
Assets accounted for at fair value on a recurring basis |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed maturities, AFS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ABS |
|
$ |
2,450 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,948 |
|
|
$ |
502 |
|
CDOs |
|
|
2,563 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
2,562 |
|
CMBS |
|
|
8,290 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,092 |
|
|
|
198 |
|
Corporate |
|
|
30,835 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24,305 |
|
|
|
6,530 |
|
Government/government agencies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign |
|
|
1,031 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
963 |
|
|
|
68 |
|
United States |
|
|
4,240 |
|
|
|
271 |
|
|
|
3,969 |
|
|
|
|
|
RMBS |
|
|
4,506 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,153 |
|
|
|
1,353 |
|
States, municipalities and political subdivisions |
|
|
10,953 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,739 |
|
|
|
214 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total fixed maturities, AFS |
|
|
64,868 |
|
|
|
271 |
|
|
|
53,170 |
|
|
|
11,427 |
|
Equity securities, trading |
|
|
30,813 |
|
|
|
2,285 |
|
|
|
28,528 |
|
|
|
|
|
Equity securities, AFS |
|
|
1,308 |
|
|
|
241 |
|
|
|
839 |
|
|
|
228 |
|
Other investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Variable annuity hedging derivatives |
|
|
604 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
601 |
|
Other derivatives[1] |
|
|
342 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
305 |
|
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other investments |
|
|
946 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
308 |
|
|
|
638 |
|
Short-term investments |
|
|
12,701 |
|
|
|
10,478 |
|
|
|
2,223 |
|
|
|
|
|
Reinsurance
recoverable for U.S. Guaranteed Minimum Withdrawal Benefit
(GMWB) |
|
|
632 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
632 |
|
Separate account assets [2] |
|
|
131,069 |
|
|
|
98,229 |
|
|
|
32,167 |
|
|
|
673 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets accounted for at fair value on a recurring basis |
|
$ |
242,337 |
|
|
$ |
111,504 |
|
|
$ |
117,235 |
|
|
$ |
13,598 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities accounted for at fair value on a recurring basis |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other policyholder funds and benefits payable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Guaranteed living benefits |
|
$ |
(3,344 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(3,344 |
) |
Institutional notes |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
Equity linked notes |
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other policyholder funds and benefits payable |
|
|
(3,348 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,348 |
) |
Other liabilities [3] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Variable annuity hedging derivatives |
|
|
391 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(143 |
) |
|
|
534 |
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
(579 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(260 |
) |
|
|
(319 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other liabilities |
|
|
(188 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(403 |
) |
|
|
215 |
|
Consumer notes [4] |
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities accounted for at fair value on a recurring basis |
|
$ |
(3,540 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(403 |
) |
|
$ |
(3,137 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1] |
|
Includes over-the-counter derivative instruments in a net asset value position which may require the counterparty to pledge
collateral to the Company. As of June 30, 2009, $580 of cash collateral liability was netted against the derivative asset value in
the condensed consolidated balance sheet and is excluded from the table above. See footnote 3 below for derivative liabilities. |
|
[2] |
|
Excludes approximately $3 billion of investment sales receivable net of investment purchases payable that are not subject to SFAS 157. |
|
[3] |
|
Includes over-the-counter derivative instruments in a net negative market value position (derivative liability). In the SFAS 157
Level 3 roll-forward table included below in this Note 4, the derivative asset and liability are referred to as freestanding
derivatives and are presented on a net basis. |
|
[4] |
|
Represents embedded derivatives associated with non-funding agreement-backed consumer equity linked notes. |
19
THE HARTFORD FINANCIAL SERVICES GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
4. Fair Value Measurements (continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted Prices in |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Active Markets |
|
|
Significant |
|
|
Significant |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for Identical |
|
|
Observable |
|
|
Unobservable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets |
|
|
Inputs |
|
|
Inputs |
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
(Level 1) |
|
|
(Level 2) |
|
|
(Level 3) |
|
Assets accounted for at fair value on a recurring basis |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed maturities, AFS |
|
$ |
65,112 |
|
|
$ |
3,541 |
|
|
$ |
49,761 |
|
|
$ |
11,810 |
|
Equity securities, trading |
|
|
30,820 |
|
|
|
1,634 |
|
|
|
29,186 |
|
|
|
|
|
Equity securities, AFS |
|
|
1,458 |
|
|
|
246 |
|
|
|
671 |
|
|
|
541 |
|
Other investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Variable annuity hedging derivatives |
|
|
600 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
587 |
|
Other investments [1] |
|
|
976 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,005 |
|
|
|
(29 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other investments |
|
|
1,576 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,018 |
|
|
|
558 |
|
Short-term investments |
|
|
10,022 |
|
|
|
7,025 |
|
|
|
2,997 |
|
|
|
|
|
Reinsurance recoverable for U.S. GMWB |
|
|
1,302 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,302 |
|
Separate account assets [2] |
|
|
126,777 |
|
|
|
94,804 |
|
|
|
31,187 |
|
|
|
786 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets accounted for at fair value on a recurring basis |
|
$ |
237,067 |
|
|
$ |
107,250 |
|
|
$ |
114,820 |
|
|
$ |
14,997 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities accounted for at fair value on a recurring basis |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other policyholder funds and benefits payable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Guaranteed living benefits |
|
$ |
(6,620 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(6,620 |
) |
Institutional notes |
|
|
(41 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(41 |
) |
Equity linked notes |
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other policyholder funds and benefits payable |
|
|
(6,669 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,669 |
) |
Other liabilities [3] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Variable annuity hedging derivatives |
|
|
2,201 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
2,187 |
|
Other derivative liabilities |
|
|
(339 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
76 |
|
|
|
(415 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other liabilities |
|
|
1,862 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
90 |
|
|
|
1,772 |
|
Consumer notes [4] |
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities accounted for at fair value on a recurring basis |
|
$ |
(4,812 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
90 |
|
|
$ |
(4,902 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1] |
|
Includes over-the-counter derivative instruments in a net asset value position which may require the counterparty to pledge
collateral to the Company. As of December 31, 2008, $574 of cash collateral liability was netted against the derivative asset value
in the condensed consolidated balance sheet and is excluded from the table above. See footnote 3 below for derivative liabilities. |
|
[2] |
|
Excludes approximately $3 billion of investment sales receivable net of investment purchases payable that are not subject to SFAS 157. |
|
[3] |
|
Includes over-the-counter derivative instruments in a net negative market value position (derivative liability). In the SFAS 157
Level 3 roll-forward table included below in this Note 4, the derivative asset and liability are referred to as freestanding
derivatives and are presented on a net basis. |
|
[4] |
|
Represents embedded derivatives associated with non-funding agreement-backed consumer equity linked notes. |
20
THE HARTFORD FINANCIAL SERVICES GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
4. Fair Value Measurements (continued)
Determination of fair values
The valuation methodologies used to determine the fair values of assets and liabilities under the
exit price notion of SFAS 157 and related FSPs, reflect market-participant objectives and are
based on the application of the fair value hierarchy that prioritizes relevant observable market
inputs over unobservable inputs. The Company determines the fair values of certain financial
assets and financial liabilities based on quoted market prices, where available and where prices
represent a reasonable estimate of fair value. The Company also determines fair value based on
future cash flows discounted at the appropriate current market rate. Fair values reflect
adjustments for counterparty credit quality, the Companys default spreads, liquidity and, where
appropriate, risk margins on unobservable parameters. The following is a discussion of the
methodologies used to determine fair values for the financial instruments listed in the above
tables.
Fixed Maturity, Short-Term, and Equity Securities, Available-for-Sale
The fair value for fixed maturity, short-term and equity securities, AFS, in an active and orderly
market (e.g. not distressed or forced liquidation) is determined by management after considering
one of three primary sources of information: third party pricing services, independent broker
quotations or pricing matrices. Security pricing is applied using a waterfall approach whereby
publicly available prices are first sought from third party pricing services, the remaining
unpriced securities are submitted to independent brokers for prices, or lastly, securities are
priced using a pricing matrix. Typical inputs used by these three pricing methods include, but are
not limited to, reported trades, benchmark yields, issuer spreads, bids, offers, and/or estimated
cash flows and prepayments speeds. Based on the typical trading volumes and the lack of quoted
market prices for fixed maturities, third party pricing services will normally derive the security
prices from recent reported trades for identical or similar securities making adjustments through
the reporting date based upon available market observable information as outlined above. If there
are no recent reported trades, the third party pricing services and brokers may use matrix or model
processes to develop a security price where future cash flow expectations are developed based upon
collateral performance and discounted at an estimated market rate. Included in the pricing of ABS
and RMBS are estimates of the rate of future prepayments of principal over the remaining life of
the securities. Such estimates are derived based on the characteristics of the underlying
structure and prepayment speeds previously experienced at the interest rate levels projected for
the underlying collateral. Actual prepayment experience may vary from these estimates.
Prices from third party pricing services are often unavailable for securities that are rarely
traded or are traded only in privately negotiated transactions. As a result, certain securities
are priced via independent broker quotations which utilize inputs that may be difficult to
corroborate with observable market based data. Additionally, the majority of these independent
broker quotations are non-binding. A pricing matrix is used to price securities for which the
Company is unable to obtain either a price from a third party pricing service or an independent
broker quotation. The pricing matrix used by the Company begins with current spread levels to
determine the market price for the security. The credit spreads, as assigned by a knowledgeable
private placement broker, incorporate the issuers credit rating and a risk premium, if warranted,
due to the issuers industry and the securitys time to maturity. The issuer-specific yield
adjustments, which can be positive or negative, are updated twice per year, as of June 30 and
December 31, by the private placement broker and are intended to adjust security prices for
issuer-specific factors. The Company assigns a credit rating to these securities based upon an
internal analysis of the issuers financial strength.
The Company performs a monthly analysis of the prices and credit spreads received from third
parties to ensure that the prices represent a reasonable estimate of the fair value. As a part of
this analysis the Company considers trading volume and other factors to determine whether the
decline in market activity is significant when compared to normal activity in an active market, and
if so, whether transactions may not be orderly considering the weight of available evidence. If
the available evidence indicates that pricing is based upon transactions that are stale or not
orderly, the Company places little, if any, weight on the transaction price and will estimate fair
value utilizing an internal pricing model. This process involves quantitative and qualitative
analysis and is overseen by investment and accounting professionals. Examples of procedures
performed include, but are not limited to, initial and on-going review of third party pricing
services methodologies, review of pricing statistics and trends, back testing recent trades, and
monitoring of trading volumes, new issuance activity and other market activities. In addition, the
Company ensures that prices received from independent brokers represent a reasonable estimate of
fair value through the use of internal and external cash flow models developed based on spreads,
and when available, market indices. As a result of this analysis, if the Company determines that
there is a more appropriate fair value based upon the available market data, the price received
from the third party is adjusted accordingly. The Companys internal pricing model utilizes the
Companys best estimate of expected future cash flows discounted at a rate of return that a market
participant would require. The significant inputs to the model include, but are not limited to,
current market inputs, such as credit loss assumptions, estimated prepayment speeds and market risk
premiums.
The Company adopted FSP No. FAS 157-4, Determining Fair Value when the Volume and Level of
Activity for the Asset or Liability Have Significantly Decreased and Identifying Transactions That
Are Not Orderly (FSP FAS 157-4) effective April 1, 2009. For further discussion of FSP FAS
157-4, see Note 1 of the Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements. The Companys
adoption of FSP FAS 157-4 did not have a material effect on the Companys Condensed Consolidated
Financial Statements.
21
THE HARTFORD FINANCIAL SERVICES GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
4. Fair Value Measurements (continued)
In accordance with SFAS 157, the Company has analyzed the third party pricing services valuation
methodologies and related inputs, and has also evaluated the various types of securities in its
investment portfolio to determine an appropriate SFAS 157 fair value hierarchy level based upon
trading activity and the observability of market inputs. The SFAS 157 fair value hierarchy
prioritizes the inputs in the valuation techniques used to measure fair value into three broad
levels (Level 1 quoted prices in active markets for identical assets, Level 2 significant
observable inputs, or Level 3 significant unobservable inputs). For further discussion of SFAS
157, see Note 4 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements. Based on this, each price
was classified into Level 1, 2, or 3. Most prices provided by third party pricing services are
classified into Level 2 because the inputs used in pricing the securities are market observable.
Due to a general lack of transparency in the process that brokers use to develop prices, most
valuations that are based on brokers prices are classified as Level 3. Some valuations may be
classified as Level 2 if the price can be corroborated. Internal matrix priced securities,
primarily consisting of certain private placement debt, are also classified as Level 3. The matrix
pricing of certain private placement debt includes significant non-observable inputs, the
internally determined credit rating of the security and an externally provided credit spread.
Derivative Instruments, including embedded derivatives within investments
Derivative instruments are reported in the condensed consolidated balance sheets at fair value and
are reported in Other Investments and Other Liabilities. Embedded derivatives are reported with
the host instruments in the condensed consolidated balance sheet. Derivative instruments are fair
valued using pricing valuation models, which utilize market data inputs or independent broker
quotations. Excluding embedded derivatives, as of June 30, 2009, 95% of derivatives based upon
notional values were priced by valuation models, which utilize independent market data. The
remaining derivatives were priced by broker quotations. The derivatives are valued using
mid-market inputs that are predominantly observable in the market. Inputs used to value
derivatives include, but are not limited to, interest swap rates, foreign currency forward and spot
rates, credit spreads and correlations, interest and equity volatility and equity index levels.
The Company performs a monthly analysis on derivative valuations which includes both quantitative
and qualitative analysis. Examples of procedures performed include, but are not limited to, review
of pricing statistics and trends, back testing recent trades, analyzing the impacts of changes in
the market environment, and review of changes in market value for each derivative including those
derivatives priced by brokers.
Derivative instruments classified as Level 1 include futures and certain option contracts which are
traded on active exchange markets.
Derivative instruments classified as Level 2 primarily include interest rate, currency and certain
credit default swaps. The derivative valuations are determined using pricing models with inputs
that are observable in the market or can be derived principally from or corroborated by observable
market data.
Derivative instruments classified as Level 3 include complex derivatives, such as equity options
and swaps, interest rate derivatives which have interest rate optionality, certain credit default
swaps, and long-dated interest rate swaps. Also included in Level 3 classification for derivatives
are customized equity swaps that partially hedge the U.S. GMWB liabilities. These derivative
instruments are valued using pricing models which utilize both observable and unobservable inputs
and, to a lesser extent, broker quotations. A derivative instrument containing Level 1 or Level 2
inputs will be classified as a Level 3 financial instrument in its entirety if it has as least one
significant Level 3 input.
The Company utilizes derivative instruments to manage the risk associated with certain assets and
liabilities. However, the derivative instrument may not be classified with the same fair value
hierarchy level as the associated assets and liabilities. Therefore the realized and unrealized
gains and losses on derivatives reported in Level 3 may not reflect the offsetting impact of the
realized and unrealized gains and losses of the associated assets and liabilities.
U.S. GMWB Reinsurance Derivative
The fair value of the U.S. GMWB reinsurance derivative is calculated as an aggregation of the
components described in the Living Benefits Required to be Fair Valued discussion below and is
modeled using significant unobservable policyholder behavior inputs, identical to those used in
calculating the underlying liability, such as lapses, fund selection, resets and withdrawal
utilization and risk margins. As a result, the U.S. GMWB reinsurance derivative is categorized as
Level 3.
Separate Account Assets
Separate account assets are primarily invested in mutual funds but also have investments in fixed
maturity and equity securities. The separate account investments are valued in the same manner,
and using the same pricing sources and inputs, as the fixed maturity, equity security, and
short-term investments of the Company. Open-ended mutual funds are included in Level 1. Most debt
securities and short-term investments are included in Level 2. Level 3 assets include less liquid
securities, such as highly structured and/or lower quality ABS and CMBS, ABS backed by sub-prime
loans, and any investment priced solely by broker quotes.
22
THE HARTFORD FINANCIAL SERVICES GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
4. Fair Value Measurements (continued)
Living Benefits Required to be Fair Valued (in Other Policyholder Funds and Benefits Payable)
Fair
values for GMWB and guaranteed minimum accumulation benefit (GMAB) contracts and the related reinsurance and customized derivatives that
hedge certain equity markets exposure for GMWB contracts are calculated based upon internally
developed models because active, observable markets do not exist for those items. The fair value
of the Companys guaranteed benefit liabilities, classified as embedded derivatives, and the
related reinsurance and customized freestanding derivatives is calculated as an aggregation of the
following components: Best Estimate (formerly known as the Pre-SFAS 157 Fair Value);
Actively-Managed Volatility Adjustment; Credit Standing Adjustment; Market Illiquidity Premium; and
Behavior Risk Margin. The resulting aggregation is reconciled or calibrated, if necessary, to
market information that is, or may be, available to the Company, but may not be observable by other
market participants, including reinsurance discussions and transactions. The Company believes the
aggregation of each of these components, as necessary and as reconciled or calibrated to the market
information available to the Company, results in an amount that the Company would be required to
transfer, for a liability, or receive, for an asset, to or from market participants in an active
liquid market, if one existed, for those market participants to assume the risks associated with
the guaranteed minimum benefits and the related reinsurance and customized derivatives. The SFAS
157 fair value is likely to materially diverge from the ultimate settlement of the liability as the
Company believes settlement will be based on our best estimate assumptions rather than those best
estimate assumptions plus risk margins. In the absence of any transfer of the guaranteed benefit
liability to a third party, the release of risk margins is likely to be reflected as realized gains
in future periods net income. Each of the components described below are unobservable in the
marketplace and require subjectivity by the Company in determining their value.
|
|
Best Estimate. This component represents the estimated amount for which a financial
instrument could be exchanged in a current transaction between knowledgeable, unrelated
willing parties using identifiable, measurable and significant inputs. Since a reliable
estimate of market risk margins is not obtainable, the present value of expected future cash
flows under a risk neutral framework, discounted at the risk free rate of interest, is used to
estimate this component. |
|
|
The Best Estimate is calculated based on actuarial and capital market assumptions related to
projected cash flows, including benefits and related contract charges, over the lives of the
contracts, incorporating expectations concerning policyholder behavior such as lapses, fund
selection, resets and withdrawal utilization (for the customized derivatives, policyholder
behavior is prescribed in the derivative contract). Because of the dynamic and complex nature
of these cash flows, best estimate assumptions and a Monte Carlo stochastic process involving
the generation of thousands of scenarios that assume risk neutral returns consistent with swap
rates and a blend of observable implied index volatility levels were used. Estimating these
cash flows involves numerous estimates and subjective judgments including those regarding
expected markets rates of return, market volatility, correlations of market index returns to
funds, fund performance, discount rates and policyholder behavior. At each valuation date, the
Company assumes expected returns based on: |
|
|
|
risk-free rates as represented by the current LIBOR forward curve rates; |
|
|
|
forward market volatility assumptions for each underlying index based primarily on a
blend of observed market implied volatility data; |
|
|
|
correlations of market returns across underlying indices based on actual observed market
returns and relationships over the ten years preceding the valuation date; |
|
|
|
three years of history for fund regression; and |
|
|
|
current risk-free spot rates as represented by the current LIBOR spot curve to determine
the present value of expected future cash flows produced in the stochastic projection
process. |
|
|
As many guaranteed benefit obligations are relatively new in the marketplace, actual
policyholder behavior experience is limited. As a result, estimates of future policyholder
behavior are subjective and based on analogous internal and external data. As markets change,
mature and evolve and actual policyholder behavior emerges, management continually evaluates the
appropriateness of its assumptions for this component of the fair value model. |
|
|
Actively-Managed Volatility Adjustment. This component incorporates the basis differential
between the observable index implied volatilities used to calculate the Best Estimate
component and the actively-managed funds underlying the variable annuity product. The
Actively-Managed Volatility Adjustment is calculated using historical fund and weighted index
volatilities. |
23
THE HARTFORD FINANCIAL SERVICES GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
4. Fair Value Measurements (continued)
|
|
Credit Standing Adjustment. This assumption makes an adjustment that market participants
would make to reflect the risk that guaranteed benefit obligations or the GMWB reinsurance
recoverables will not be fulfilled (nonperformance risk). As a result of sustained
volatility in the Companys credit default spreads, during the first quarter of 2009 the
Company changed its estimate of the Credit Standing Adjustment to incorporate observable
Company and reinsurer credit default spreads from capital markets, adjusted for market
recoverability. Prior to the first quarter of 2009, the Company calculated the Credit Standing
Adjustment by using default rates published by rating agencies, adjusted for market
recoverability. The changes made in the first quarter of 2009 resulted in a realized gain of
$383, before-tax, for U.S. GMWB liabilities and a realized loss of $185, before-tax, for
uncollateralized reinsurance recoverable assets. |
|
|
Market Illiquidity Premium. This component makes an adjustment that market participants
would require to reflect that guaranteed benefit obligations are illiquid and have no market
observable exit prices in the capital markets. |
|
|
Behavior Risk Margin and Other Policyholder Behavior Assumptions. The behavior risk margin
adds a margin that market participants would require for the risk that the Companys
assumptions about policyholder behavior could differ from actual experience. The behavior
risk margin is calculated by taking the difference between adverse policyholder behavior
assumptions and best estimate assumptions. During the first half of 2009, the Company
revised certain adverse assumptions in the behavior risk margin for withdrawals, lapses and
annuitization behavior as emerging policyholder behavior experience suggested the prior
adverse policyholder behavior assumptions were no longer representative of an appropriate
margin for risk. These changes resulted in a realized gain of $352, before-tax, in the first
quarter of 2009 and a realized gain of $118, before-tax, in the second quarter of 2009. |
Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis Using Significant Unobservable
Inputs (Level 3)
The tables below provide a fair value roll forward for the three and six months ending June 30,
2009 and 2008, for the financial instruments for which significant unobservable inputs (Level 3)
are used in the fair value measurement on a recurring basis. The Company classifies the fair
values of financial instruments within Level 3 if there are no observable markets for the
instruments or, in the absence of active markets, the majority of the inputs used to determine fair
value are based on the Companys own assumptions about market participant assumptions. However,
the Company prioritizes the use of market-based inputs over entity-based assumptions in determining
Level 3 fair values in accordance with SFAS 157. Therefore, the gains and losses in the tables
below include changes in fair value due partly to observable and unobservable factors.
24
THE HARTFORD FINANCIAL SERVICES GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
4. Fair Value Measurements (continued)
These disclosures reflect the impacts of recurring fair value measurements on earnings or changes
in net assets and assist in the broad assessment of the quality of those earnings.
Roll-forward of Financial Instruments Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis Using Significant
Unobservable Inputs (Level 3) for the three months ended June 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
unrealized gains |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(losses) included |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
in net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Realized/unrealized gains |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
related to |
|
|
|
Fair value |
|
|
(losses) |
|
|
Purchases, |
|
|
Transfers |
|
|
Fair value |
|
|
financial |
|
|
|
as of |
|
|
included in: |
|
|
issuances, |
|
|
in and/or |
|
|
as of |
|
|
instruments still |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
Net income |
|
|
OCI |
|
|
and |
|
|
(out) of |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
held at June 30, |
|
Asset (Liability) |
|
2009 |
|
|
[1], [2] |
|
|
[3] |
|
|
settlements |
|
|
Level 3 [4] |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2009 [2] |
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed maturities, AFS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ABS |
|
$ |
544 |
|
|
$ |
(7 |
) |
|
$ |
75 |
|
|
$ |
(29 |
) |
|
$ |
(81 |
) |
|
$ |
502 |
|
|
$ |
(8 |
) |
CDO |
|
|
2,422 |
|
|
|
(73 |
) |
|
|
246 |
|
|
|
(33 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,562 |
|
|
|
(94 |
) |
CMBS |
|
|
188 |
|
|
|
(35 |
) |
|
|
47 |
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
198 |
|
|
|
(26 |
) |
Corporate |
|
|
6,597 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
427 |
|
|
|
(36 |
) |
|
|
(464 |
) |
|
|
6,530 |
|
|
|
(26 |
) |
Government/govt. agencies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign |
|
|
65 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
68 |
|
|
|
|
|
United States |
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RMBS |
|
|
1,278 |
|
|
|
(51 |
) |
|
|
(34 |
) |
|
|
157 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
1,353 |
|
|
|
(85 |
) |
States, municipalities and political subdivisions |
|
|
172 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
(13 |
) |
|
|
54 |
|
|
|
214 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed maturities, AFS |
|
|
11,274 |
|
|
|
(160 |
) |
|
|
765 |
|
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
(493 |
) |
|
|
11,427 |
|
|
|
(239 |
) |
Equity securities, AFS |
|
|
510 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
74 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
(358 |
) |
|
|
228 |
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives [5] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Variable annuity hedging derivatives |
|
|
2,552 |
|
|
|
(1,201 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(216 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,135 |
|
|
|
(1,133 |
) |
Other freestanding derivatives |
|
|
(380 |
) |
|
|
85 |
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
(282 |
) |
|
|
91 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total freestanding derivatives |
|
|
2,172 |
|
|
|
(1,116 |
) |
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
(195 |
) |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
853 |
|
|
|
(1,042 |
) |
Reinsurance recoverable for U.S. GMWB [1] |
|
|
1,058 |
|
|
|
(433 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
632 |
|
|
|
(433 |
) |
Separate accounts [6] |
|
|
639 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
673 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other policyholder funds and benefits payable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Guaranteed living benefits[1] |
|
$ |
(5,930 |
) |
|
$ |
2,628 |
|
|
$ |
(7 |
) |
|
$ |
(35 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(3,344 |
) |
|
$ |
2,628 |
|
Institutional notes |
|
|
(25 |
) |
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
27 |
|
Equity linked notes |
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other policyholder funds and benefits payable |
|
|
(5,960 |
) |
|
|
2,654 |
|
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
(35 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,348 |
) |
|
|
2,654 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer notes |
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1] |
|
The Company classifies gains and losses on GMWB reinsurance derivatives and Guaranteed Living Benefit embedded derivatives as unrealized gains/losses for purposes of disclosure in this table because it is impracticable
to track on a contract-by-contract basis the realized gains/losses for these derivatives and embedded derivatives. |
|
[2] |
|
All amounts in these columns are reported in net realized capital gains/losses except for $1 for the three months ended June 30, 2009, which is reported in benefits, losses and loss adjustment expenses. All amounts
are before income taxes and amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs and present value of future profits (DAC). |
|
[3] |
|
OCI refers to Other comprehensive income in the condensed consolidated statement of comprehensive income (loss). All amounts are before income taxes and amortization of DAC. |
|
[4] |
|
Transfers in and/or (out) of Level 3 during the three months ended June 30, 2009 are attributable to a change in the availability of market observable information and re-evaluation of the observability of pricing
inputs primarily for certain long-dated corporate bonds and preferred stocks. |
|
[5] |
|
Derivative are reported in this table on a net basis for asset/(liability) positions and reported in the condensed consolidated balance sheet in other investments and other liabilities. |
|
[6] |
|
The realized/unrealized
gains (losses) included in net income for separate account assets are offset by an equal amount for separate account liabilities, which results in a net zero impact on net income for the Company. |
25
THE HARTFORD FINANCIAL SERVICES GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
4. Fair Value Measurements (continued)
Roll-forward of Financial Instruments Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis Using
Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3) for the six months ended June 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
unrealized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
gains (losses) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
included in net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Realized/unrealized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
income related |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
gains (losses) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
to financial |
|
|
|
Fair value |
|
|
included in: |
|
|
Purchases, |
|
|
Transfers |
|
|
Fair value |
|
|
instruments |
|
|
|
as of |
|
|
Net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
issuances, |
|
|
in and/or |
|
|
as of |
|
|
still held at |
|
|
|
January 1, |
|
|
income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
and |
|
|
(out) of |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
Asset (Liability) |
|
2009 |
|
|
[1], [2] |
|
|
OCI [3] |
|
|
settlements |
|
|
Level 3 [4] |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2009 [2] |
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed maturities, AFS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ABS |
|
$ |
536 |
|
|
$ |
(9 |
) |
|
$ |
36 |
|
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
$ |
(62 |
) |
|
$ |
502 |
|
|
$ |
(8 |
) |
CDO |
|
|
2,612 |
|
|
|
(95 |
) |
|
|
98 |
|
|
|
(53 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,562 |
|
|
|
(94 |
) |
CMBS |
|
|
341 |
|
|
|
(48 |
) |
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
(115 |
) |
|
|
198 |
|
|
|
(26 |
) |
Corporate |
|
|
6,396 |
|
|
|
(60 |
) |
|
|
407 |
|
|
|
198 |
|
|
|
(411 |
) |
|
|
6,530 |
|
|
|
(26 |
) |
Government/govt. agencies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign |
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
(20 |
) |
|
|
68 |
|
|
|
|
|
United States |
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RMBS |
|
|
1,662 |
|
|
|
(169 |
) |
|
|
(244 |
) |
|
|
101 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
1,353 |
|
|
|
(85 |
) |
States, municipalities and political subdivisions |
|
|
155 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
(13 |
) |
|
|
78 |
|
|
|
214 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed maturities, AFS |
|
|
11,810 |
|
|
|
(381 |
) |
|
|
316 |
|
|
|
216 |
|
|
|
(534 |
) |
|
|
11,427 |
|
|
|
(239 |
) |
Equity securities, AFS |
|
|
541 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
(309 |
) |
|
|
228 |
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives [5] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Variable annuity hedging derivatives |
|
|
2,774 |
|
|
|
(1,093 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(546 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,135 |
|
|
|
(1,042 |
) |
Other freestanding derivatives |
|
|
(281 |
) |
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
(282 |
) |
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total freestanding derivatives |
|
|
2,493 |
|
|
|
(1,098 |
) |
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
(526 |
) |
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
853 |
|
|
|
(1,033 |
) |
Reinsurance recoverable for U.S. GMWB [1] |
|
|
1,302 |
|
|
|
(685 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
632 |
|
|
|
(685 |
) |
Separate account assets [6] |
|
|
786 |
|
|
|
(122 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
110 |
|
|
|
(101 |
) |
|
|
673 |
|
|
|
(73 |
) |
|
Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other policyholder funds and benefits payable[1] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Guaranteed Living Benefits |
|
$ |
(6,620 |
) |
|
$ |
3,349 |
|
|
$ |
(3 |
) |
|
$ |
(70 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(3,344 |
) |
|
$ |
3,349 |
|
Institutional notes |
|
|
(41 |
) |
|
|
43 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
43 |
|
Equity linked notes |
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
2 |
|
Total other policyholder funds and benefits payable[1] |
|
|
(6,669 |
) |
|
|
3,394 |
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
(70 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,348 |
) |
|
|
3,394 |
|
Other derivative liabilities [7] |
|
|
(163 |
) |
|
|
70 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
93 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer notes |
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
[1] |
|
The Company classifies gains and losses on GMWB reinsurance
derivatives and Guaranteed Living Benefit embedded derivatives as
unrealized gains/losses for purposes of disclosure in this table
because it is impracticable to track on a contract-by-contract
basis the realized gains/losses for these derivatives and
embedded derivatives. |
|
[2] |
|
All amounts in these columns are reported in net realized capital
gains/losses except for $2 for the six months ended June 30,
2009, which is reported in benefits, losses and loss adjustment
expenses. All amounts are before income taxes and amortization
of DAC. |
|
[3] |
|
OCI refers to Other comprehensive income in the condensed
consolidated statement of comprehensive loss. All amounts are
before income taxes and amortization of DAC. |
|
[4] |
|
Transfers in and/or (out) of Level 3 during the six months ended
June 30, 2009 are attributable to a change in the availability of
market observable information and re-evaluation of the
observability of pricing inputs for individual securities within
the respective categories. |
|
[5] |
|
Derivative are reported in this table on a net basis for
asset/(liability) positions and reported in the condensed
consolidated balance sheet in other investments and other
liabilities. |
|
[6] |
|
The realized/unrealized gains (losses) included in net income for
separate account assets are offset by an equal amount for
separate account liabilities, which results in a net zero impact
on net income for the Company. |
|
[7] |
|
On March 26, 2009, certain of the Allianz warrants were
reclassified to equity, at their current fair value, as
shareholder approval of the conversion of these warrants to
common shares was received. See Note 13 for further discussion. |
26
THE HARTFORD FINANCIAL SERVICES GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
4. Fair Value Measurements (continued)
Roll-forward of Financial Instruments Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis Using
Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3) for the three months ended June 30, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
unrealized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
gains (losses) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
included in net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Realized/unrealized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
income related |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
gains (losses) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
to financial |
|
|
|
Fair value |
|
|
included in: |
|
|
Purchases, |
|
|
Transfers |
|
|
Fair value |
|
|
instruments |
|
|
|
as of |
|
|
Net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
issuances, |
|
|
in and/or |
|
|
as of |
|
|
still held at |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
and |
|
|
(out) of |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
Asset (Liability) |
|
2008 |
|
|
[1], [2] |
|
|
OCI [3] |
|
|
settlements |
|
|
Level 3 [4] |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2008 [2] |
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed maturities, AFS |
|
$ |
16,447 |
|
|
$ |
(74 |
) |
|
$ |
(286 |
) |
|
$ |
305 |
|
|
$ |
120 |
|
|
$ |
16,512 |
|
|
$ |
(75 |
) |
Equity securities, AFS |
|
|
1,285 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
236 |
|
|
|
(148 |
) |
|
|
1,367 |
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
Derivatives [5] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Variable Annuity Hedging Derivatives |
|
|
998 |
|
|
|
(208 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
793 |
|
|
|
(195 |
) |
Other freestanding derivatives |
|
|
(334 |
) |
|
|
(74 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
(404 |
) |
|
|
(43 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total freestanding derivatives |
|
|
664 |
|
|
|
(282 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
389 |
|
|
|
(238 |
) |
Reinsurance recoverable for U.S. GMWB [1] |
|
|
291 |
|
|
|
(46 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
250 |
|
|
|
(46 |
) |
Separate accounts [6] |
|
|
580 |
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(58 |
) |
|
|
120 |
|
|
|
665 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other policyholder funds and benefits payable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Guaranteed Living Benefits[1] |
|
$ |
(1,993 |
) |
|
$ |
322 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(32 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(1,703 |
) |
|
$ |
322 |
|
Institutional notes |
|
|
(50 |
) |
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(21 |
) |
|
|
29 |
|
Equity linked notes |
|
|
(15 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other policyholder funds and benefits payable |
|
|
(2,058 |
) |
|
|
351 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(32 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,739 |
) |
|
|
351 |
|
Consumer notes |
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
[1] |
|
The Company classifies gains and losses on GMWB reinsurance
derivatives and Guaranteed Living Benefit embedded derivatives as
unrealized gains/losses for purposes of disclosure in this table
because it is impracticable to track on a contract-by-contract
basis the realized gains/losses for these derivatives and embedded
derivatives. |
|
[2] |
|
All amounts in these columns are reported in net realized capital
gains/losses except for ($1) for the three months ended June 30,
2008, which is reported in benefits, losses and loss adjustment
expenses. All amounts are before income taxes and amortization of
DAC. |
|
[3] |
|
OCI refers to Other comprehensive income in the consolidated
statement of comprehensive loss. All amounts are before income
taxes and amortization of DAC. |
|
[4] |
|
Transfers in and/or (out) of Level 3 during the three months ended
June 30, 2008 are attributable to a change in the availability of
market observable information and re-evaluation of the
observability of pricing inputs for individual securities within
the respective categories. |
|
[5] |
|
Derivative instruments, are reported in this table on a net basis
for asset/(liability) positions and reported in the condensed
consolidated balance sheet in other investments and other
liabilities. |
|
[6] |
|
The realized/unrealized gains (losses) included in net income for
separate account assets are offset by an equal amount for separate
account liabilities, which results in a net zero impact on net
income for the Company. |
27
THE HARTFORD FINANCIAL SERVICES GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
4. Fair Value Measurements (continued)
Roll-forward of Financial Instruments Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis Using
Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3) for the six months ended June 30, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
unrealized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
gains (losses) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
included in net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Realized/unrealized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
income related |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
gains (losses) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
to financial |
|
|
|
Fair value |
|
|
included in: |
|
|
Purchases, |
|
|
Transfers |
|
|
Fair value |
|
|
instruments |
|
|
|
as of |
|
|
Net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
issuances, |
|
|
in and/or |
|
|
as of |
|
|
still held at |
|
|
|
January 1, |
|
|
income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
and |
|
|
(out) of |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
Asset (Liability) |
|
2008 |
|
|
[1], [2] |
|
|
OCI [3] |
|
|
settlements |
|
|
Level 3 [4] |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2008 [2] |
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed maturities, AFS |
|
$ |
17,996 |
|
|
$ |
(177 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,396 |
) |
|
$ |
1,278 |
|
|
$ |
(1,189 |
) |
|
$ |
16,512 |
|
|
$ |
(75 |
) |
Equity securities, AFS |
|
|
1,339 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(129 |
) |
|
|
327 |
|
|
|
(169 |
) |
|
|
1,367 |
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
Derivatives [5] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Variable Annuity Hedging Derivatives |
|
|
673 |
|
|
|
63 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
57 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
793 |
|
|
|
64 |
|
Other freestanding derivatives |
|
|
(419 |
) |
|
|
(266 |
) |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
178 |
|
|
|
101 |
|
|
|
(404 |
) |
|
|
(160 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total freestanding derivatives |
|
|
254 |
|
|
|
(203 |
) |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
235 |
|
|
|
101 |
|
|
|
389 |
|
|
|
(96 |
) |
Reinsurance recoverable for U.S. GMWB [1] [6] |
|
|
238 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
250 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
Separate accounts [7] |
|
|
701 |
|
|
|
(56 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
665 |
|
|
|
(54 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other policyholder funds and benefits payable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Guaranteed Living Benefits[1] |
|
$ |
(1,472 |
) |
|
$ |
(175 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(56 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(1,703 |
) |
|
$ |
(175 |
) |
Institutional notes |
|
|
(24 |
) |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(21 |
) |
|
|
3 |
|
Equity linked notes |
|
|
(21 |
) |
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15 |
) |
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other policyholder funds and benefits payable |
|
|
(1,517 |
) |
|
|
(166 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(56 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,739 |
) |
|
|
(166 |
) |
Consumer notes |
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
[1] |
|
The Company classifies the gains and losses on GMWB reinsurance derivatives and Guaranteed Living Benefit embedded
derivatives as unrealized gains/losses for purposes of disclosure in this table because it is impracticable to track on
a contract-by-contract basis the realized gains/losses for these derivatives and embedded derivatives. |
|
[2] |
|
All amounts in these columns are reported in net realized capital gains/losses except for $1 for the six months ended
June 30, 2008, which is reported in benefits, losses and loss adjustment expenses. All amounts are before income taxes
and amortization of DAC. |
|
[3] |
|
OCI refers to Other comprehensive income in the consolidated statement of comprehensive loss. All amounts are before
income taxes and amortization of DAC. |
|
[4] |
|
Transfers in and/or (out) of Level 3 during the six months ended June 30, 2008 are attributable to a change in the
availability of market observable information and re-evaluation of the observability of pricing inputs for individual
securities within the respective categories. |
|
[5] |
|
Derivative instruments, are reported in this table on a net basis for asset/(liability) positions and reported in the
condensed consolidated balance sheet in other investments and other liabilities. |
|
[6] |
|
The January 1, 2008 fair value of $238 includes the pre-SFAS 157 fair value of $128 and transitional adjustment of $110. |
|
[7] |
|
The realized/unrealized gains (losses) included in net income for separate account assets are offset by an equal amount
for separate account liabilities, which results in a net zero impact on net income for the Company. |
28
THE HARTFORD FINANCIAL SERVICES GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
4. Fair Value Measurements (continued)
Financial Instruments Not Carried at Fair Value
The following include disclosures for other financial instruments not carried at fair value and not
included in above SFAS 157 discussion.
The carrying amounts and fair values of The Hartfords financial instruments not carried at fair
value, as of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Value |
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Policy loans |
|
$ |
2,204 |
|
|
$ |
2,409 |
|
|
$ |
2,208 |
|
|
$ |
2,435 |
|
Mortgage loans on real estate |
|
|
6,522 |
|
|
|
5,231 |
|
|
|
6,469 |
|
|
|
5,654 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other policyholder funds and benefits payable [1] |
|
$ |
14,466 |
|
|
$ |
14,437 |
|
|
$ |
14,839 |
|
|
$ |
14,576 |
|
Commercial paper [2] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
374 |
|
|
|
374 |
|
Long-term debt [3] |
|
|
5,765 |
|
|
|
5,088 |
|
|
|
5,755 |
|
|
|
4,539 |
|
Consumer notes [4] |
|
|
1,195 |
|
|
|
1,235 |
|
|
|
1,205 |
|
|
|
1,188 |
|
|
|
|
[1] |
|
Excludes guarantees on variable annuities, group accident and health and universal life insurance contracts, including corporate owned
life insurance. |
|
[2] |
|
Included in short-term debt in the consolidated balance sheets. As of June 30, 2009, The Hartford has no commercial paper outstanding. |
|
[3] |
|
Excludes capital lease obligations of $67 and $68 as of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively, and includes current
maturities of long-term debt of $275 and $0 as of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively. |
|
[4] |
|
Excludes amounts carried at fair value and included in SFAS 157 disclosures above. |
Included in other liabilities in the condensed consolidated balance sheet are carrying amounts
of $389 and $149 for deposits and Federal Home Bank advances, respectively, related to Federal
Trust Corporation. These carrying amounts approximate fair value.
The Company has not made any changes in its valuation methodologies for the following assets and
liabilities since December 31, 2008.
|
|
Fair value for policy loans and consumer notes were estimated using discounted cash flow
calculations using current interest rates. |
|
|
Fair values for mortgage loans on real estate were estimated using discounted cash flow
calculations based on current lending rates for similar type loans. Current lending rates
reflect changes in credit spreads and the remaining terms of the loans. |
|
|
Other policyholder funds and benefits payable, not carried at fair value and not included
in above SFAS 157 fair value information, is determined by estimating future cash flows,
discounted at the current market rate. |
|
|
Carrying amounts approximate fair value for commercial paper. As of June 30, 2009, the
Company has no outstanding commercial paper. |
|
|
Fair value for long-term debt is based primarily on market quotations from independent
third party pricing services. |
29
THE HARTFORD FINANCIAL SERVICES GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
5. Investments and Derivative Instruments
Available-for-Sale Securities
The following table presents the Companys AFS securities by type on a consolidated basis.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2009 |
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
Cost or |
|
|
Gross |
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non- |
|
|
Cost or |
|
|
Gross |
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Credit |
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Gains |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Value |
|
|
OTTI [1] |
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Gains |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Value |
|
AFS securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ABS |
|
$ |
3,272 |
|
|
$ |
13 |
|
|
$ |
(835 |
) |
|
$ |
2,450 |
|
|
$ |
(66 |
) |
|
$ |
3,431 |
|
|
$ |
6 |
|
|
$ |
(971 |
) |
|
$ |
2,466 |
|
CDOs |
|
|
4,547 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
(1,987 |
) |
|
|
2,563 |
|
|
|
(141 |
) |
|
|
4,655 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
(2,045 |
) |
|
|
2,612 |
|
CMBS |
|
|
12,361 |
|
|
|
51 |
|
|
|
(4,122 |
) |
|
|
8,290 |
|
|
|
(119 |
) |
|
|
12,973 |
|
|
|
43 |
|
|
|
(4,703 |
) |
|
|
8,313 |
|
Corporate |
|
|
33,454 |
|
|
|
707 |
|
|
|
(3,326 |
) |
|
|
30,835 |
|
|
|
(28 |
) |
|
|
31,059 |
|
|
|
623 |
|
|
|
(4,501 |
) |
|
|
27,181 |
|
Govt./govt. agencies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign |
|
|
1,014 |
|
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
(24 |
) |
|
|
1,031 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,786 |
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
(65 |
) |
|
|
2,821 |
|
United States |
|
|
4,471 |
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
(254 |
) |
|
|
4,240 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,883 |
|
|
|
112 |
|
|
|
(39 |
) |
|
|
5,956 |
|
RMBS |
|
|
5,738 |
|
|
|
92 |
|
|
|
(1,324 |
) |
|
|
4,506 |
|
|
|
(154 |
) |
|
|
6,045 |
|
|
|
96 |
|
|
|
(1,033 |
) |
|
|
5,108 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
States, municipalities and political subdivisions |
|
|
11,339 |
|
|
|
210 |
|
|
|
(596 |
) |
|
|
10,953 |
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
11,406 |
|
|
|
202 |
|
|
|
(953 |
) |
|
|
10,655 |
|
Fixed maturities |
|
|
76,196 |
|
|
|
1,140 |
|
|
|
(12,468 |
) |
|
|
64,868 |
|
|
|
(511 |
) |
|
|
78,238 |
|
|
|
1,184 |
|
|
|
(14,310 |
) |
|
|
65,112 |
|
Equity securities |
|
|
1,518 |
|
|
|
233 |
|
|
|
(443 |
) |
|
|
1,308 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,554 |
|
|
|
203 |
|
|
|
(299 |
) |
|
|
1,458 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total AFS securities |
|
$ |
77,714 |
|
|
$ |
1,373 |
|
|
$ |
(12,911 |
) |
|
$ |
66,176 |
|
|
$ |
(511 |
) |
|
$ |
79,792 |
|
|
$ |
1,387 |
|
|
$ |
(14,609 |
) |
|
$ |
66,570 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1] |
|
Represents the amount of cumulative non-credit other-than-temporary impairment (OTTI)
losses transferred to other comprehensive loss in accordance with FSP FAS 115-2 for securities
that also had a credit impairment, of which $248 was added for the three months ended June 30,
2009. These losses are included in gross unrealized losses as of June 30, 2009. |
The Company participates in securities lending programs to generate additional income.
Through these programs, certain domestic fixed income securities are loaned from the Companys
portfolio to qualifying third party borrowers in return for collateral in the form of cash or U.S.
government securities. As of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, under terms of securities
lending programs, the fair value of loaned securities was approximately $695 and $2.9 billion,
respectively, which was included in fixed maturities in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet.
As of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, the Company held collateral associated with the loaned
securities in the amount of $707 and $3.0 billion, respectively.
The following table presents the Companys fixed maturities by contractual maturity year.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2009 |
|
Maturity |
|
Amortized Cost |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
One year or less |
|
$ |
1,992 |
|
|
$ |
2,041 |
|
Over one year through five years |
|
|
12,061 |
|
|
|
11,980 |
|
Over five years through ten years |
|
|
13,975 |
|
|
|
12,997 |
|
Over ten years |
|
|
36,320 |
|
|
|
28,694 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal |
|
|
64,348 |
|
|
|
55,712 |
|
ABS, CDOs and RMBS [1] |
|
|
11,848 |
|
|
|
9,156 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
76,196 |
|
|
$ |
64,868 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated maturities may differ from contractual maturities due to security call or prepayment
provisions. Due to the potential for prepayment on certain mortgage- and asset-backed securities,
ABS, CDOs and RMBS are not categorized by contractual maturity. CMBS and CRE CDOs are categorized
by contractual maturity because they generally are not subject to prepayment risk as these
securities are generally structured to include forms of call protections such as yield maintenance
charges, prepayment penalties or lockouts and defeasance.
30
THE HARTFORD FINANCIAL SERVICES GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
5. Investments and Derivative Instruments (continued)
Net Realized Capital Gains (Losses)
The following table presents the Companys net realized capital gains and losses.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
(Before-tax) |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Gross gains on sale |
|
$ |
157 |
|
|
$ |
73 |
|
|
$ |
365 |
|
|
$ |
168 |
|
Gross losses on sale |
|
|
(189 |
) |
|
|
(59 |
) |
|
|
(909 |
) |
|
|
(270 |
) |
Net other-than-temporary impairment losses recognized in earnings |
|
|
(314 |
) |
|
|
(164 |
) |
|
|
(538 |
) |
|
|
(468 |
) |
Japanese fixed annuity contract hedges, net [1] |
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
(9 |
) |
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
(23 |
) |
Periodic net coupon settlements on credit derivatives/Japan |
|
|
(13 |
) |
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
(32 |
) |
|
|
(15 |
) |
SFAS 157 transition impact |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(650 |
) |
Results of variable annuity hedge program |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GMWB derivatives, net [2] |
|
|
671 |
|
|
|
(13 |
) |
|
|
1,260 |
|
|
|
(123 |
) |
Macro hedge program |
|
|
(568 |
) |
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
(364 |
) |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total results of variable annuity hedge program |
|
|
103 |
|
|
|
(17 |
) |
|
|
896 |
|
|
|
(118 |
) |
Other, net [3] |
|
|
(419 |
) |
|
|
(96 |
) |
|
|
(414 |
) |
|
|
(277 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net realized capital gains (losses) |
|
$ |
(681 |
) |
|
$ |
(282 |
) |
|
$ |
(597 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,653 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1] |
|
Relates to the Japanese fixed annuity product (product and related derivative hedging instruments excluding periodic net coupon settlements). |
|
[2] |
|
The net gain on GMWB derivatives for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 was primarily due to a decline in equity volatility
levels, an increase in interest rates and liability model assumption updates for withdrawals, lapses, and credit standing. |
|
[3] |
|
Primarily consists of changes in fair value on non-qualifying derivatives, hedge ineffectiveness on qualifying derivative instruments,
foreign currency gains and losses, valuation allowances, a loss of approximately $300 related to a contingent obligation associated with the
Allianz transaction, and other investment gains and losses. |
Net realized capital gains and losses from investment sales, after deducting the life and
pension policyholders share for certain products, are reported as a component of revenues and are
determined on a specific identification basis. Net realized capital losses reported for the three
and six months ended June 30, 2009 related to AFS other-than-temporary impairments and net losses
on sales were $346 and $1.1 billion, respectively, and were previously reported as unrealized
losses in AOCI. Proceeds from sales of AFS securities totaled $8.4 billion and $28.1 billion,
respectively, for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009, and $3.6 billion and $8.7 billion,
respectively, for the three and six months ended June 30, 2008.
Other-Than-Temporary Impairment Losses
The following table presents the Companys credit other-than-temporary impairments (credit
impairments) on debt securities held as of June 30, 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credit OTTI |
|
Balance as of March 31, 2009 |
|
$ |
(1,320 |
) |
Additions for credit impairments recognized on [1]: |
|
|
|
|
Securities not previously impaired |
|
|
(212 |
) |
Securities previously impaired |
|
|
(49 |
) |
Reductions for credit impairments previously recognized on: |
|
|
|
|
Securities that matured or were sold during the period |
|
|
|
|
Securities that the Company intends to sell or more likely than not will be required to sell before recovery |
|
|
3 |
|
Securities due to an increase in expected cash flows |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of June 30, 2009 |
|
$ |
(1,578 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1] |
|
Total additions of $261 are included in the net other-than-temporary impairment losses
recognized in earnings of $314 in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations. Also
included in the $314 are impairments of $8 representing securities the Company intends to
sell and $45 representing equity securities. |
31
THE HARTFORD FINANCIAL SERVICES GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
5. Investments and Derivative Instruments (continued)
Security Unrealized Loss Aging
The following tables present the Companys unrealized loss aging for AFS securities by type and
length of time the security was in a continuous unrealized loss position.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2009 |
|
|
|
Less Than 12 Months |
|
|
12 Months or More |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Losses |
|
AFS securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ABS |
|
$ |
440 |
|
|
$ |
328 |
|
|
$ |
(112 |
) |
|
$ |
2,372 |
|
|
$ |
1,649 |
|
|
$ |
(723 |
) |
|
$ |
2,812 |
|
|
$ |
1,977 |
|
|
$ |
(835 |
) |
CDOs |
|
|
2,022 |
|
|
|
1,506 |
|
|
|
(516 |
) |
|
|
2,516 |
|
|
|
1,045 |
|
|
|
(1,471 |
) |
|
|
4,538 |
|
|
|
2,551 |
|
|
|
(1,987 |
) |
CMBS |
|
|
3,394 |
|
|
|
2,430 |
|
|
|
(964 |
) |
|
|
8,014 |
|
|
|
4,856 |
|
|
|
(3,158 |
) |
|
|
11,408 |
|
|
|
7,286 |
|
|
|
(4,122 |
) |
Corporate |
|
|
7,859 |
|
|
|
6,621 |
|
|
|
(1,238 |
) |
|
|
11,712 |
|
|
|
9,624 |
|
|
|
(2,088 |
) |
|
|
19,571 |
|
|
|
16,245 |
|
|
|
(3,326 |
) |
Government/government agencies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign |
|
|
150 |
|
|
|
136 |
|
|
|
(14 |
) |
|
|
117 |
|
|
|
107 |
|
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
267 |
|
|
|
243 |
|
|
|
(24 |
) |
United States |
|
|
3,034 |
|
|
|
2,780 |
|
|
|
(254 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,034 |
|
|
|
2,780 |
|
|
|
(254 |
) |
RMBS |
|
|
841 |
|
|
|
707 |
|
|
|
(134 |
) |
|
|
2,410 |
|
|
|
1,220 |
|
|
|
(1,190 |
) |
|
|
3,251 |
|
|
|
1,927 |
|
|
|
(1,324 |
) |
States, municipalities and political
subdivisions |
|
|
1,797 |
|
|
|
1,708 |
|
|
|
(89 |
) |
|
|
5,020 |
|
|
|
4,513 |
|
|
|
(507 |
) |
|
|
6,817 |
|
|
|
6,221 |
|
|
|
(596 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed maturities |
|
|
19,537 |
|
|
|
16,216 |
|
|
|
(3,321 |
) |
|
|
32,161 |
|
|
|
23,014 |
|
|
|
(9,147 |
) |
|
|
51,698 |
|
|
|
39,230 |
|
|
|
(12,468 |
) |
Equity securities |
|
|
892 |
|
|
|
577 |
|
|
|
(315 |
) |
|
|
364 |
|
|
|
236 |
|
|
|
(128 |
) |
|
|
1,256 |
|
|
|
813 |
|
|
|
(443 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total securities in an unrealized loss |
|
$ |
20,429 |
|
|
$ |
16,793 |
|
|
$ |
(3,636 |
) |
|
$ |
32,525 |
|
|
$ |
23,250 |
|
|
$ |
(9,275 |
) |
|
$ |
52,954 |
|
|
$ |
40,043 |
|
|
$ |
(12,911 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
Less Than 12 Months |
|
|
12 Months or More |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Losses |
|
AFS securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ABS |
|
$ |
1,190 |
|
|
$ |
958 |
|
|
$ |
(232 |
) |
|
$ |
2,092 |
|
|
$ |
1,353 |
|
|
$ |
(739 |
) |
|
$ |
3,282 |
|
|
$ |
2,311 |
|
|
$ |
(971 |
) |
CDOs |
|
|
688 |
|
|
|
440 |
|
|
|
(248 |
) |
|
|
3,941 |
|
|
|
2,144 |
|
|
|
(1,797 |
) |
|
|
4,629 |
|
|
|
2,584 |
|
|
|
(2,045 |
) |
CMBS |
|
|
5,704 |
|
|
|
4,250 |
|
|
|
(1,454 |
) |
|
|
6,647 |
|
|
|
3,398 |
|
|
|
(3,249 |
) |
|
|
12,351 |
|
|
|
7,648 |
|
|
|
(4,703 |
) |
Corporate |
|
|
16,604 |
|
|
|
14,145 |
|
|
|
(2,459 |
) |
|
|
7,028 |
|
|
|
4,986 |
|
|
|
(2,042 |
) |
|
|
23,632 |
|
|
|
19,131 |
|
|
|
(4,501 |
) |
Government/government agencies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign |
|
|
1,263 |
|
|
|
1,211 |
|
|
|
(52 |
) |
|
|
43 |
|
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
(13 |
) |
|
|
1,306 |
|
|
|
1,241 |
|
|
|
(65 |
) |
United States |
|
|
4,120 |
|
|
|
4,083 |
|
|
|
(37 |
) |
|
|
66 |
|
|
|
64 |
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
4,186 |
|
|
|
4,147 |
|
|
|
(39 |
) |
RMBS |
|
|
731 |
|
|
|
546 |
|
|
|
(185 |
) |
|
|
2,607 |
|
|
|
1,759 |
|
|
|
(848 |
) |
|
|
3,338 |
|
|
|
2,305 |
|
|
|
(1,033 |
) |
States, municipalities and political
subdivisions |
|
|
5,153 |
|
|
|
4,640 |
|
|
|
(513 |
) |
|
|
2,578 |
|
|
|
2,138 |
|
|
|
(440 |
) |
|
|
7,731 |
|
|
|
6,778 |
|
|
|
(953 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed maturities |
|
|
35,453 |
|
|
|
30,273 |
|
|
|
(5,180 |
) |
|
|
25,002 |
|
|
|
15,872 |
|
|
|
(9,130 |
) |
|
|
60,455 |
|
|
|
46,145 |
|
|
|
(14,310 |
) |
Equity securities |
|
|
1,017 |
|
|
|
796 |
|
|
|
(221 |
) |
|
|
277 |
|
|
|
199 |
|
|
|
(78 |
) |
|
|
1,294 |
|
|
|
995 |
|
|
|
(299 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total securities in an unrealized loss |
|
$ |
36,470 |
|
|
$ |
31,069 |
|
|
$ |
(5,401 |
) |
|
$ |
25,279 |
|
|
$ |
16,071 |
|
|
$ |
(9,208 |
) |
|
$ |
61,749 |
|
|
$ |
47,140 |
|
|
$ |
(14,609 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of June 30, 2009, AFS securities in an unrealized loss position, comprised of approximately
5,446 securities, primarily related to CMBS, corporate securities, most significantly within the
financial services sector, CDOs and RMBS which have experienced significant price deterioration.
The Company does not intend to sell nor does it expect to be required to sell the securities
outlined above. In addition, the Company asserts its intent and ability to retain the above equity
securities until price recovery. Furthermore, based upon the Companys cash flow modeling and the
expected continuation of contractually required principal and interest payments, the Company has
deemed these securities to be temporarily impaired as of June 30, 2009.
32
THE HARTFORD FINANCIAL SERVICES GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
5. Investments and Derivative Instruments (continued)
Mortgage Loans
The following table presents the Companys mortgage loans on real estate by type on a consolidated
basis.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2009 |
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Valuation |
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Valuation |
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
|
Cost [1] |
|
|
Allowance |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Cost [1] |
|
|
Allowance |
|
|
Value |
|
Agricultural |
|
$ |
629 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
629 |
|
|
$ |
646 |
|
|
$ |
11 |
|
|
$ |
635 |
|
Commercial |
|
|
5,832 |
|
|
|
163 |
|
|
|
5,669 |
|
|
|
5,849 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
5,834 |
|
Residential [2] |
|
|
224 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
224 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
6,685 |
|
|
$ |
163 |
|
|
$ |
6,522 |
|
|
$ |
6,495 |
|
|
$ |
26 |
|
|
$ |
6,469 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1] |
|
Amortized cost represents carrying value prior to valuation allowances, if any. |
|
[2] |
|
Relates to residential mortgage loans acquired through the purchase of Federal Trust Corporation. For further
information on the acquisition, see Note 16 of the Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements. |
The Company has a monitoring process that is overseen by a committee of investment and
accounting professionals that identifies mortgage loans for impairment. For those mortgage loans
that, based upon current information and events, it is probable that the Company will not be able
to collect all amounts due according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement, an impairment
is recognized and a valuation allowance is established with an offsetting charge to net realized
capital losses.
The following table presents the activity within the Companys valuation allowance for mortgage
loans for the six months ended June 30, 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Valuation Allowance |
|
Balance at December 31, 2008 |
|
$ |
26 |
|
Additions |
|
|
153 |
|
Deductions |
|
|
(16 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Balance at June 30, 2009 |
|
$ |
163 |
|
|
|
|
|
The following tables present the Companys commercial mortgage loans, including agricultural loans,
by region and property type on a consolidated basis.
Commercial Mortgage Loans on Real Estate by Region
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2009 |
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
Percent of |
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
Percent of |
|
|
|
Value |
|
|
Total |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Total |
|
East North Central |
|
$ |
158 |
|
|
|
2.5 |
% |
|
$ |
162 |
|
|
|
2.5 |
% |
East South Central |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Middle Atlantic |
|
|
764 |
|
|
|
12.1 |
% |
|
|
717 |
|
|
|
11.1 |
% |
Mountain |
|
|
187 |
|
|
|
3.0 |
% |
|
|
223 |
|
|
|
3.4 |
% |
New England |
|
|
469 |
|
|
|
7.4 |
% |
|
|
487 |
|
|
|
7.5 |
% |
Pacific |
|
|
1,516 |
|
|
|
24.1 |
% |
|
|
1,495 |
|
|
|
23.1 |
% |
South Atlantic |
|
|
1,162 |
|
|
|
18.4 |
% |
|
|
1,102 |
|
|
|
17.0 |
% |
West North Central |
|
|
63 |
|
|
|
1.0 |
% |
|
|
64 |
|
|
|
1.0 |
% |
West South Central |
|
|
332 |
|
|
|
5.3 |
% |
|
|
333 |
|
|
|
5.2 |
% |
Other [1] |
|
|
1,647 |
|
|
|
26.2 |
% |
|
|
1,886 |
|
|
|
29.2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
6,298 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
$ |
6,469 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1] |
|
Includes multi-regional properties. |
33
THE HARTFORD FINANCIAL SERVICES GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
5. Investments and Derivative Instruments (continued)
Commercial Mortgage Loans on Real Estate by Property Type
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2009 |
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
Percent of |
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
Percent of |
|
|
|
Value |
|
|
Total |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Total |
|
Agricultural |
|
$ |
629 |
|
|
|
10.0 |
% |
|
$ |
635 |
|
|
|
9.8 |
% |
Industrial |
|
|
1,109 |
|
|
|
17.6 |
% |
|
|
1,118 |
|
|
|
17.3 |
% |
Lodging |
|
|
480 |
|
|
|
7.6 |
% |
|
|
483 |
|
|
|
7.5 |
% |
Multifamily |
|
|
996 |
|
|
|
15.8 |
% |
|
|
1,131 |
|
|
|
17.5 |
% |
Office |
|
|
1,872 |
|
|
|
29.7 |
% |
|
|
1,885 |
|
|
|
29.1 |
% |
Retail |
|
|
824 |
|
|
|
13.1 |
% |
|
|
884 |
|
|
|
13.7 |
% |
Other |
|
|
388 |
|
|
|
6.2 |
% |
|
|
333 |
|
|
|
5.1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
6,298 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
$ |
6,469 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Variable Interest Entities
The Company is involved with VIEs primarily as a collateral manager and as an investor through
normal investment activities. The Companys involvement includes providing investment management
and administrative services for a fee and holding ownership or other interests as an investor. The
Company also has involvement with VIEs as a means of accessing capital.
The following table presents the carrying value of assets and liabilities and the maximum exposure
to loss relating to VIEs for which the Company has concluded that it is the primary beneficiary and
therefore are consolidated in the Companys consolidated financial statements.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2009 |
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maximum |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maximum |
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
Total |
|
|
Exposure |
|
|
Total |
|
|
Total |
|
|
Exposure |
|
|
|
Assets |
|
|
Liabilities [1] |
|
|
to Loss [2] |
|
|
Assets |
|
|
Liabilities [1] |
|
|
to Loss |
|
|
CLOs |
|
$ |
251 |
|
|
$ |
37 |
|
|
$ |
230 |
|
|
$ |
339 |
|
|
$ |
69 |
|
|
$ |
257 |
|
Limited partnerships |
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
151 |
|
|
|
43 |
|
|
|
108 |
|
Other investments |
|
|
163 |
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
147 |
|
|
|
249 |
|
|
|
59 |
|
|
|
221 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
449 |
|
|
$ |
58 |
|
|
$ |
410 |
|
|
$ |
739 |
|
|
$ |
171 |
|
|
$ |
586 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1] |
|
Creditors have no recourse against the Company in the event of
default by the VIE. Includes noncontrolling interest in limited
partnerships and other investments of $12 and $82 as of June 30,
2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively, that is reported as a
separate component of equity in the Companys Condensed
Consolidated Balance Sheet pursuant to SFAS 160. |
|
[2] |
|
The Companys maximum exposure to loss represents the maximum loss
amount that the Company could recognize as a reduction in net
investment income or as a realized capital loss and is the
consolidated assets at cost net of liabilities. The Company has
no implied or unfunded commitments to these VIEs. |
During the six months ended June 30, 2009, the Company liquidated or partially liquidated two
investments for which the Company had been the primary beneficiary. As a result of the
liquidations, the Company is no longer deemed to be the primary beneficiary and accordingly, these
VIEs were deconsolidated.
The following table presents the carrying value of assets and liabilities and the maximum exposure
to loss relating to VIEs for which the Company has a significant involvement with but has concluded
that it is not the primary beneficiary and therefore are not consolidated. Each of these
investments has been held by the Company for over two years.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2009 |
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maximum |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maximum |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exposure |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exposure |
|
|
|
Assets |
|
|
Liabilities |
|
|
to Loss |
|
|
Assets |
|
|
Liabilities |
|
|
to Loss |
|
CLOs [1] |
|
$ |
279 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
311 |
|
|
$ |
308 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
349 |
|
CDOs [1] |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15 |
|
Other [2] |
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
42 |
|
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total [3] |
|
$ |
319 |
|
|
$ |
38 |
|
|
$ |
347 |
|
|
$ |
353 |
|
|
$ |
40 |
|
|
$ |
369 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1] |
|
Maximum exposure to loss represents the Companys investment in securities issued by CLOs/CDOs at cost. |
|
[2] |
|
Maximum exposure to loss represents issuance costs that were incurred to establish the contingent capital facility.
For further information on the contingent capital facility, see the Variable Interest Entities section of Note 5 in The
Hartfords 2008 Form 10-K Annual Report. |
|
[3] |
|
The Company has no implied or unfunded commitments to these VIEs. |
34
THE HARTFORD FINANCIAL SERVICES GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
5. Investments and Derivative Instruments (continued)
Derivative instruments
The Company utilizes a variety of over-the-counter and exchange traded derivative instruments,
including swaps, caps, floors, forwards, futures and options, through one of four Company-approved
objectives: to manage risk associated with interest rate, equity market, credit spread and issuer
default, price, or currency exchange rate risk or volatility; to manage liquidity; to control
transaction costs; or to enter into replication transactions. The Company also purchases and
issues financial instruments and products that either are accounted for as free-standing
derivatives, such as certain reinsurance contracts, or may contain features that are deemed to be
embedded derivative instruments, such as the GMWB rider included with certain variable annuity
products.
Derivative instruments are recorded in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets at fair value.
Pursuant to FIN No. 39, Offsetting of Amounts Related to Certain Contracts and FIN No. 39-1
Amendment of FASB Interpretation No. 39, the Company offsets the fair value amounts, income
accruals, and cash collateral held, related to derivative instruments executed in a legal entity
and with the same counterparty under a master netting agreement. The following table summarizes
the fair value of derivative instruments, excluding income accruals and cash collateral held, as
they are presented in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Derivatives |
|
|
Asset Derivatives |
|
|
Liability Derivatives |
|
|
|
Jun. 30, |
|
|
Dec. 31, |
|
|
Jun. 30, |
|
|
Dec. 31, |
|
|
Jun. 30, |
|
|
Dec. 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Fixed maturities, available-for-sale |
|
$ |
(9 |
) |
|
$ |
(3 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(9 |
) |
|
$ |
(3 |
) |
Other investments |
|
|
946 |
|
|
|
1,576 |
|
|
|
1,248 |
|
|
|
2,172 |
|
|
|
(302 |
) |
|
|
(596 |
) |
Reinsurance recoverables |
|
|
632 |
|
|
|
1,302 |
|
|
|
632 |
|
|
|
1,302 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other policyholder funds and benefits payable |
|
|
(3,350 |
) |
|
|
(6,628 |
) |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,352 |
) |
|
|
(6,628 |
) |
Consumer notes |
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
(5 |
) |
Other liabilities [1] |
|
|
(188 |
) |
|
|
1,862 |
|
|
|
1,490 |
|
|
|
3,460 |
|
|
|
(1,678 |
) |
|
|
(1,598 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
(1,973 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,896 |
) |
|
$ |
3,372 |
|
|
$ |
6,934 |
|
|
$ |
(5,345 |
) |
|
$ |
(8,830 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1] |
|
Included in Other liabilities in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet is a liability
value of $(660) and $(2,531) related to derivative collateral as of June 30, 2009 and December
31, 2008, respectively. |
The Company will designate each derivative instrument in accordance with SFAS 133 as either a
cash flow hedging instrument (cash flow hedge), a fair value hedging instrument (fair value
hedge), or not qualified as a hedging instrument (non-qualifying strategies). See the related
sections that follow for descriptions of the accounting treatment for each type of designation.
The purpose of the table presented below is to summarize the balance sheet classification of the
Companys derivative fair value amounts, categorized by the accounting designation, type of
derivative instrument, and risk that they are hedging as is noted in the strategy descriptions.
This table presents on a strategy level basis the balance sheet location of net fair value amounts
of derivative instruments, as well as the gross asset and liability amounts. Derivatives in the
Companys separate accounts are not included because the associated gains and losses accrue
directly to policyholders. The Companys derivative instruments are held for risk management
purposes, unless otherwise noted in the tables below. The notional amount of derivative contracts
represents the basis upon which pay or receive amounts are calculated and is presented in the table
to quantify the volume of the Companys derivative activity. Notional amounts are not necessarily
reflective of credit risk. Below the table, the primary changes of notional amount and fair value
are discussed in detail. The most significant change in notional amount since December 31, 2008,
is related to derivatives associated with the macro hedge program, which reflects the Companys
increased focus on the protection of statutory surplus. The most significant contributors to the
decrease in fair value are interest rate derivatives due to an increase in interest rates, Japan
fixed annuity and 3Win hedging instruments due to strengthening of the U.S. dollar against the
Japanese Yen, and credit derivatives that economically hedge fixed maturity securities due to
credit spreads tightening. These declines were partially offset by an increase in fair value of
GMWB derivatives primarily due to market-based valuation changes as well as policyholder behavior
and liability model assumption updates.
35
THE HARTFORD FINANCIAL SERVICES GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
5. Investments and Derivative Instruments (continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset |
|
|
Liability |
|
|
|
Net Derivatives |
|
|
Derivatives |
|
|
Derivatives |
|
|
|
Notional Amount |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
|
Jun. 30, |
|
|
Dec. 31, |
|
|
Jun. 30, |
|
|
Dec. 31, |
|
|
Jun. 30, |
|
|
Dec. 31, |
|
|
Jun. 30, |
|
|
Dec. 31, |
|
Accounting Designation/Type/Hedging Strategy |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Cash flow hedges |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate swaps |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate swaps are primarily used to convert interest receipts on floating-rate fixed maturity securities or interest payments on floating-rate guaranteed investment contracts to fixed rates. These derivatives are
predominantly used to better match cash receipts from assets with cash disbursements required to fund liabilities. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company also enters into forward starting swap agreements to hedge the interest rate exposure related to the purchase of fixed-rate securities or the anticipated future cash flows of floating-rate fixed maturity securities due
to changes in the benchmark interest rate, London-Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR). These derivatives are primarily structured to hedge interest rate risk inherent in the assumptions used to price certain liabilities. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance sheet location Other investments |
|
$ |
2,658 |
|
|
$ |
4,760 |
|
|
$ |
141 |
|
|
$ |
429 |
|
|
$ |
157 |
|
|
$ |
429 |
|
|
$ |
(16 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
Balance sheet location Other liabilities |
|
|
7,442 |
|
|
|
4,270 |
|
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
211 |
|
|
|
148 |
|
|
|
214 |
|
|
|
(155 |
) |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest rate swaps |
|
|
10,100 |
|
|
|
9,030 |
|
|
|
134 |
|
|
|
640 |
|
|
|
305 |
|
|
|
643 |
|
|
|
(171 |
) |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency swaps |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency swaps are used to convert foreign denominated cash flows related to certain investment receipts and liabilities payments to U.S. dollars in order to minimize cash flow fluctuations due to changes in currency rates. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance sheet location Other investments |
|
|
373 |
|
|
|
570 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
99 |
|
|
|
(33 |
) |
|
|
(49 |
) |
Balance sheet location Other liabilities |
|
|
494 |
|
|
|
640 |
|
|
|
(39 |
) |
|
|
(57 |
) |
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
55 |
|
|
|
(60 |
) |
|
|
(112 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total foreign currency swaps |
|
|
867 |
|
|
|
1,210 |
|
|
|
(33 |
) |
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
60 |
|
|
|
154 |
|
|
|
(93 |
) |
|
|
(161 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cash flow hedges |
|
|
10,967 |
|
|
|
10,240 |
|
|
|
101 |
|
|
|
633 |
|
|
|
365 |
|
|
|
797 |
|
|
|
(264 |
) |
|
|
(164 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value hedges |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate swaps |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate swaps are used to hedge the changes in fair value of certain fixed rate liabilities and fixed maturity securities due to changes in the benchmark interest rate, LIBOR. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance sheet location Other investments |
|
|
117 |
|
|
|
1,043 |
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
(45 |
) |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
(61 |
) |
Balance sheet location Other liabilities |
|
|
1,669 |
|
|
|
1,095 |
|
|
|
(42 |
) |
|
|
(41 |
) |
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
(55 |
) |
|
|
(66 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest rate swaps |
|
|
1,786 |
|
|
|
2,138 |
|
|
|
(47 |
) |
|
|
(86 |
) |
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
(61 |
) |
|
|
(127 |
) |
Foreign currency swaps |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency swaps are used to hedge the changes in fair value of certain foreign denominated fixed rate liabilities due to changes in foreign currency rates. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance sheet location Other investments |
|
|
164 |
|
|
|
164 |
|
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance sheet location Other liabilities |
|
|
532 |
|
|
|
532 |
|
|
|
(42 |
) |
|
|
(93 |
) |
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
(52 |
) |
|
|
(104 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total foreign currency swaps |
|
|
696 |
|
|
|
696 |
|
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
(57 |
) |
|
|
42 |
|
|
|
47 |
|
|
|
(52 |
) |
|
|
(104 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total fair value hedges |
|
|
2,482 |
|
|
|
2,834 |
|
|
|
(57 |
) |
|
|
(143 |
) |
|
|
56 |
|
|
|
88 |
|
|
|
(113 |
) |
|
|
(231 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cash flow hedges and fair value hedges |
|
$ |
13,449 |
|
|
$ |
13,074 |
|
|
$ |
44 |
|
|
$ |
490 |
|
|
$ |
421 |
|
|
$ |
885 |
|
|
$ |
(377 |
) |
|
$ |
(395 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36
THE HARTFORD FINANCIAL SERVICES GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
5. Investments and Derivative Instruments (continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset |
|
|
Liability |
|
|
|
Net Derivatives |
|
|
Derivatives |
|
|
Derivatives |
|
|
|
Notional Amount |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
|
Jun. 30, |
|
|
Dec. 31, |
|
|
Jun. 30, |
|
|
Dec. 31, |
|
|
Jun. 30, |
|
|
Dec. 31, |
|
|
Jun. 30, |
|
|
Dec. 31, |
|
Accounting Designation/Type/Hedging Strategy |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Non-qualifying strategies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate swaps, caps, floors, and futures |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company uses interest rate swaps, caps, floors, and futures to manage duration risk between assets and liabilities in certain portfolios. In addition, the
Company enters into interest rate swaps to terminate existing swaps, thereby offsetting the changes in value of the original swap. As of June 30, 2009 and December
31, 2008, the notional amount of interest rate swaps in offsetting relationships was $7.0 billion and $6.8 billion, respectively. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance sheet location Other investments |
|
$ |
2,315 |
|
|
$ |
3,139 |
|
|
$ |
21 |
|
|
$ |
112 |
|
|
$ |
116 |
|
|
$ |
329 |
|
|
$ |
(95 |
) |
|
$ |
(217 |
) |
Balance sheet location Other liabilities |
|
|
5,970 |
|
|
|
5,017 |
|
|
|
(108 |
) |
|
|
(209 |
) |
|
|
233 |
|
|
|
602 |
|
|
|
(341 |
) |
|
|
(811 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest rate swaps, caps, floors, and forwards |
|
|
8,285 |
|
|
|
8,156 |
|
|
|
(87 |
) |
|
|
(97 |
) |
|
|
349 |
|
|
|
931 |
|
|
|
(436 |
) |
|
|
(1,028 |
) |
Foreign currency swaps and forwards |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company enters into foreign currency swaps and forwards to hedge the foreign currency exposures in certain of its foreign denominated fixed maturity investments. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance sheet location Fixed maturities, available-for-sale |
|
|
185 |
|
|
|
185 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance sheet location Other investments |
|
|
510 |
|
|
|
256 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
(2 |
) |
Balance sheet location Other liabilities |
|
|
986 |
|
|
|
672 |
|
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
(11 |
) |
|
|
(9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total foreign currency swaps and forwards |
|
|
1,681 |
|
|
|
1,113 |
|
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
(15 |
) |
|
|
(11 |
) |
Credit derivatives that purchase credit protection |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credit default swaps are used to purchase credit protection on an individual entity or referenced index to economically hedge against default risk and
credit-related changes in value on fixed maturity securities. These contracts require the Company to pay a periodic fee in exchange for compensation from the
counterparty should a credit event occur, as defined in the contract, on the part of the referenced security issuers. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance sheet location Other investments |
|
|
1,469 |
|
|
|
2,528 |
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
248 |
|
|
|
44 |
|
|
|
267 |
|
|
|
(23 |
) |
|
|
(19 |
) |
Balance sheet location Other liabilities |
|
|
2,801 |
|
|
|
1,140 |
|
|
|
(12 |
) |
|
|
92 |
|
|
|
71 |
|
|
|
94 |
|
|
|
(83 |
) |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total credit derivatives that purchase credit protection |
|
|
4,270 |
|
|
|
3,668 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
340 |
|
|
|
115 |
|
|
|
361 |
|
|
|
(106 |
) |
|
|
(21 |
) |
Credit derivatives that assume credit risk [1] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credit default swaps are used to assume credit risk related to an individual entity, referenced index, or asset pool, as a part of replication transactions.
Replication transactions are used as an economical means to synthetically replicate the characteristics and performance of assets that would otherwise be
permissible investments under the Companys investment policies. These contracts entitle the Company to receive a periodic fee in exchange for an obligation to
compensate the derivative counterparty should a credit event occur, as defined in the contract, on the part of the referenced security issuers. The Company is also
exposed to credit risk due to embedded derivatives associated with credit linked notes. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance sheet location Fixed maturities, available-for-sale |
|
|
87 |
|
|
|
117 |
|
|
|
(9 |
) |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9 |
) |
|
|
(3 |
) |
Balance sheet location Other investments |
|
|
230 |
|
|
|
625 |
|
|
|
(45 |
) |
|
|
(155 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(45 |
) |
|
|
(155 |
) |
Balance sheet location Other liabilities |
|
|
845 |
|
|
|
457 |
|
|
|
(271 |
) |
|
|
(245 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(271 |
) |
|
|
(245 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total credit derivatives that assume credit risk |
|
|
1,162 |
|
|
|
1,199 |
|
|
|
(325 |
) |
|
|
(403 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(325 |
) |
|
|
(403 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37
THE HARTFORD FINANCIAL SERVICES GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
5. Investments and Derivative Instruments (continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset |
|
|
Liability |
|
|
|
Net Derivatives |
|
|
Derivatives |
|
|
Derivatives |
|
|
|
Notional Amount |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
|
Jun. 30, |
|
|
Dec. 31, |
|
|
Jun. 30, |
|
|
Dec. 31, |
|
|
Jun. 30, |
|
|
Dec. 31, |
|
|
Jun. 30, |
|
|
Dec. 31, |
|
Accounting Designation/Type/Hedging Strategy |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Credit derivatives in offsetting positions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company enters into credit default swaps to terminate existing credit default swaps, thereby offsetting the changes in value of the original swap going forward. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance sheet location Other investments |
|
$ |
1,859 |
|
|
$ |
1,663 |
|
|
$ |
41 |
|
|
$ |
47 |
|
|
$ |
109 |
|
|
$ |
111 |
|
|
$ |
(68 |
) |
|
$ |
(64 |
) |
Balance sheet location Other liabilities |
|
|
1,899 |
|
|
|
963 |
|
|
|
(65 |
) |
|
|
(58 |
) |
|
|
145 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
(210 |
) |
|
|
(72 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total credit derivatives in offsetting positions |
|
|
3,758 |
|
|
|
2,626 |
|
|
|
(24 |
) |
|
|
(11 |
) |
|
|
254 |
|
|
|
125 |
|
|
|
(278 |
) |
|
|
(136 |
) |
Contingent Capital Facility Put Option |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company entered into a put option agreement that provides the Company the right to require a third party trust to purchase, at any time, The Hartfords junior subordinated notes in a maximum aggregate
principal amount of $500. Under the put option agreement, The Hartford will pay premiums on a periodic basis and will reimburse the trust for certain fees and ordinary expenses. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance sheet location Other investments |
|
|
500 |
|
|
|
500 |
|
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
42 |
|
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
42 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total contingent capital facility |
|
|
500 |
|
|
|
500 |
|
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
42 |
|
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
42 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Japanese fixed annuity hedging instruments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company enters into currency rate swaps and forwards to mitigate the foreign currency exchange rate and Yen interest rate exposures associated with the Yen denominated individual fixed annuity product. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance sheet location Other investments |
|
|
718 |
|
|
|
922 |
|
|
|
91 |
|
|
|
165 |
|
|
|
91 |
|
|
|
165 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance sheet location Other liabilities |
|
|
1,547 |
|
|
|
1,412 |
|
|
|
138 |
|
|
|
218 |
|
|
|
140 |
|
|
|
218 |
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Japanese fixed annuity hedging instruments |
|
|
2,265 |
|
|
|
2,334 |
|
|
|
229 |
|
|
|
383 |
|
|
|
231 |
|
|
|
383 |
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Guaranteed Minimum Accumulation Benefit (GMAB) product derivatives [1] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The GMAB rider associated with certain of the Companys Japanese variable annuity products is accounted for as a bifurcated embedded derivative. The GMAB provides the policyholder with their initial
deposit in a lump sum after a specified waiting period. The notional amount of the embedded derivative is the Yen denominated GRB balance converted to U.S. dollars at the current foreign spot exchange
rate as of the reporting period date. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance sheet location Other policyholder funds and benefits payable |
|
|
222 |
|
|
|
206 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total GMAB product derivatives |
|
|
222 |
|
|
|
206 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Japan 3Win hedging derivatives |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During the first quarter of 2009, the Company traded foreign currency swaps to hedge the foreign currency risk exposure related to Japan 3Win product GMIB fixed liability payments.
The Japan 3Win product offered both GMAB and GMIB riders attached to certain variable annuity contracts. If the policyholder account value drops below 80% of the initial deposit, either a GMIB must be
exercised or the policyholder can elect a lump sum payment. During the fourth quarter of 2008, nearly all contract holder account values had dropped below 80% of the initial deposit, at which point the
majority of policyholders had elected to exercise the GMIB. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance sheet location Other investments |
|
|
526 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Balance sheet location Other liabilities |
|
|
2,214 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(107 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(107 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Japanese fixed annuity hedging instruments |
|
|
2,740 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(112 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(116 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38
THE HARTFORD FINANCIAL SERVICES GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
5. Investments and Derivative Instruments (continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset |
|
|
Liability |
|
|
|
Net Derivatives |
|
|
Derivatives |
|
|
Derivatives |
|
|
|
Notional Amount |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
|
Jun. 30, |
|
|
Dec. 31, |
|
|
Jun. 30, |
|
|
Dec. 31, |
|
|
Jun. 30, |
|
|
Dec. 31, |
|
|
Jun. 30, |
|
|
Dec. 31, |
|
Accounting Designation/Type/Hedging Strategy |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
GMWB product derivatives [1] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company offers certain variable annuity products with a GMWB rider, primarily in the U.S. and, to a lesser
extent, the U.K. and Japan. The GMWB is a bifurcated embedded derivative that provides the policyholder with a GRB
if the account value is reduced to zero through a combination of market declines and withdrawals. The GRB is
generally equal to premiums less withdrawals. Certain contract provisions can increase the GRB at contractholder
election or after the passage of time. The notional value of the embedded derivative is the GRB balance. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance sheet location Other policyholder funds and benefits payable |
|
$ |
48,466 |
|
|
$ |
48,767 |
|
|
$ |
(3,346 |
) |
|
$ |
(6,620 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(3,346 |
) |
|
$ |
(6,620 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total GMWB product derivatives |
|
|
48,466 |
|
|
|
48,767 |
|
|
|
(3,346 |
) |
|
|
(6,620 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,346 |
) |
|
|
(6,620 |
) |
GMWB reinsurance contracts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company has entered into reinsurance arrangements to offset a portion of its risk exposure to the GMWB for the
remaining lives of covered variable annuity contracts. Reinsurance contracts covering GMWB are accounted for as
free-standing derivatives. The notional amount of the reinsurance contracts is the GRB amount. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance sheet location Reinsurance recoverables |
|
|
10,843 |
|
|
|
11,437 |
|
|
|
632 |
|
|
|
1,302 |
|
|
|
632 |
|
|
|
1,302 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total GMWB reinsurance contracts |
|
|
10,843 |
|
|
|
11,437 |
|
|
|
632 |
|
|
|
1,302 |
|
|
|
632 |
|
|
|
1,302 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GMWB hedging instruments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company enters into derivative contracts to partially hedge exposure to the income volatility associated with
the portion of the GMWB liabilities which are not reinsured. These derivative contracts include customized swaps,
interest rate swaps and futures, and equity swaps, put and call options, and futures, on certain indices including
the S&P 500 index, EAFE index, and NASDAQ index. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance sheet location Other investments |
|
|
6,157 |
|
|
|
2,265 |
|
|
|
514 |
|
|
|
599 |
|
|
|
514 |
|
|
|
627 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(28 |
) |
Balance sheet location Other liabilities |
|
|
9,920 |
|
|
|
16,355 |
|
|
|
341 |
|
|
|
2,065 |
|
|
|
565 |
|
|
|
2,070 |
|
|
|
(224 |
) |
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total GMWB hedging instruments |
|
|
16,077 |
|
|
|
18,620 |
|
|
|
855 |
|
|
|
2,664 |
|
|
|
1,079 |
|
|
|
2,697 |
|
|
|
(224 |
) |
|
|
(33 |
) |
Equity index swaps, options, and futures |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company offers certain equity indexed products, which may contain an embedded derivative that requires
bifurcation. The Company enters into S&P index swaps and options to economically hedge the equity volatility risk
associated with these embedded derivatives. In addition, the Company is exposed to bifurcated options embedded in
certain fixed maturity investments.
The Company may also enter into equity indexed futures to hedge the equity volatility of certain liability contracts. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance sheet location Fixed maturities, available-for-sale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance sheet location Other investments |
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
Balance sheet location Other liabilities |
|
|
82 |
|
|
|
101 |
|
|
|
(11 |
) |
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
(11 |
) |
|
|
(5 |
) |
Balance sheet location Consumer notes |
|
|
64 |
|
|
|
70 |
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
(5 |
) |
Balance sheet location Other policyholder funds and benefits payable |
|
|
58 |
|
|
|
58 |
|
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total equity index swaps, options, and futures |
|
|
225 |
|
|
|
256 |
|
|
|
(20 |
) |
|
|
(16 |
) |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
(21 |
) |
|
|
(19 |
) |
Japanese variable annuity hedging instruments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company enters into foreign currency forward and option contracts that convert Euros to Yen in order to
economically hedge the foreign currency risk associated with certain assumed Japanese variable annuity products. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance sheet location Other investments |
|
|
71 |
|
|
|
207 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Balance sheet location Other liabilities |
|
|
173 |
|
|
|
52 |
|
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Japanese variable annuity hedging instruments |
|
|
244 |
|
|
|
259 |
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
(12 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39
THE HARTFORD FINANCIAL SERVICES GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
5. Investments and Derivative Instruments (continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset |
|
|
Liability |
|
|
|
Net Derivatives |
|
|
Derivatives |
|
|
Derivatives |
|
|
|
Notional Amount |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
|
Jun. 30, |
|
|
Dec. 31, |
|
|
Jun. 30, |
|
|
Dec. 31, |
|
|
Jun. 30, |
|
|
Dec. 31, |
|
|
Jun. 30, |
|
|
Dec. 31, |
|
Accounting Designation/Type/Hedging Strategy |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Macro hedge program |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company utilizes equity and currency option and equity futures
contracts to partially hedge the statutory reserve impact of equity
risk and foreign currency risk arising primarily from guaranteed
minimum death benefit (GMDB) and GMWB
obligations against a decline in the equity markets or changes in
foreign currency exchange rates. The notional amount as of June 30,
2009, includes approximately $1.1 billion of short put option
contracts, therefore resulting in a net notional amount of
approximately $8.3 billion. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance sheet location Other investments |
|
$ |
2,008 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
91 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
92 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(1 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
Balance sheet location Other liabilities |
|
|
7,349 |
|
|
|
2,188 |
|
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
137 |
|
|
|
136 |
|
|
|
137 |
|
|
|
(86 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total macro hedge program |
|
|
9,357 |
|
|
|
2,188 |
|
|
|
141 |
|
|
|
137 |
|
|
|
228 |
|
|
|
137 |
|
|
|
(87 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Warrants [1] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During the fourth quarter of 2008, the Company issued warrants to
purchase the Companys Series C Non-Voting Contingent Convertible
Preferred Stock, which were required under EITF 00-19 to be accounted
for as a derivative liability at December 31, 2008. See Note 21 of
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in The Hartfords 2008 Form
10-K Annual Report for a discussion of Allianz SEs investment in The
Hartford. As of March 31, 2009, the warrants were no longer required
to be accounted for as derivatives and were reclassified to equity. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance sheet location Other liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
869 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(163 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(163 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total warrants |
|
|
|
|
|
|
869 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(163 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(163 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-qualifying strategies |
|
$ |
110,095 |
|
|
$ |
102,198 |
|
|
$ |
(2,017 |
) |
|
$ |
(2,386 |
) |
|
$ |
2,951 |
|
|
$ |
6,049 |
|
|
$ |
(4,968 |
) |
|
$ |
(8,435 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cash flow hedges, fair value hedges, and non-qualifying strategies |
|
$ |
123,544 |
|
|
$ |
115,272 |
|
|
$ |
(1,973 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,896 |
) |
|
$ |
3,372 |
|
|
$ |
6,934 |
|
|
$ |
(5,345 |
) |
|
$ |
(8,830 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1] |
|
The derivative instruments related to these hedging strategies are held for other
investment purposes. |
Change in Notional Amount
The notional amount of derivatives increased approximately $8.3 billion since December 31, 2008,
primarily due to the macro hedge program and, to a lesser extent, derivatives hedging the Japan
3Win product, partially offset by a decrease in notional of GMWB related derivatives.
|
|
The Company increased the notional amount of derivatives associated with the macro hedge
program by approximately $7.2 billion, while GMWB related derivatives decreased approximately
$3.4 billion, as a result of the Company rebalancing its risk management strategy to place a
greater relative emphasis on the protection of statutory surplus. Approximately $1.1 billion
of the $7.2 billion increase in notional amount represents short put option contracts
therefore resulting in a net increase in notional of approximately $6.1 billion. |
|
|
The Company added approximately $2.7 billion in notional related to foreign currency swaps
used to hedge the GMIB fixed payments associated with the Japan 3Win product. |
Change in Fair Value
The decrease of $77 in the total fair value of derivative instruments since December 31, 2008, was
primarily related to a decline in fair value of interest rate derivatives, credit derivatives, and
Japan fixed annuity and 3Win hedging instruments, partially offset by an increase in fair value of
GMWB related derivatives.
|
|
The fair value of interest rate derivatives used in cash flow hedge relationships declined
due to rising interest rates. |
|
|
The fair value related to credit derivatives that economically hedge fixed maturity
securities decreased as a result of credit spreads tightening. This decline was partially
offset by an increase in the fair value related to credit derivatives that assume credit risk
as a part of replication transactions. |
|
|
The fair value of the Japanese fixed annuity and Japan 3Win hedging instruments decreased
primarily due to the U.S. dollar strengthening against the Japanese Yen. |
|
|
The fair value related to GMWB derivatives increased primarily due to market-based
valuation changes, including a decrease in equity volatility levels and an increase in
interest rates, as well as policyholder behavior and liability model assumption updates. For
more information on the policyholder behavior and liability model assumption updates, refer to
Note 4. |
40
THE HARTFORD FINANCIAL SERVICES GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
5. Investments and Derivative Instruments (continued)
Cash Flow Hedges
For derivative instruments that are designated and qualify as cash flow hedges, the effective
portion of the gain or loss on the derivative is reported as a component of other comprehensive
income (OCI) and reclassified into earnings in the same period or periods during which the hedged
transaction affects earnings. Gains and losses on the derivative representing hedge
ineffectiveness are recognized in current earnings. All components of each derivatives gain or
loss were included in the assessment of hedge effectiveness.
The following table presents the components of the gain or loss on derivatives that qualify as
cash-flow hedges:
Derivatives in Cash Flow Hedging Relationships
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Realized
Capital Gains (Losses) Recognized in |
|
|
|
|
|
Gains (Losses) Recognized in OCI |
|
|
Net Income on Derivative |
|
|
|
|
|
on Derivative (Effective Portion) |
|
|
(Ineffective Portion) |
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months |
|
|
Six Months |
|
|
Three Months |
|
|
Six Months |
|
|
|
|
|
Ended |
|
|
Ended |
|
|
Ended |
|
|
Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Interest rate swaps |
|
|
|
$ |
(381 |
) |
|
$ |
(163 |
) |
|
$ |
(466 |
) |
|
$ |
(21 |
) |
|
$ |
(2 |
) |
|
$ |
2 |
|
|
$ |
(3 |
) |
|
$ |
4 |
|
Foreign currency swaps |
|
|
|
|
(154 |
) |
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
(139 |
) |
|
|
(44 |
) |
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
$ |
(535 |
) |
|
$ |
(143 |
) |
|
$ |
(605 |
) |
|
$ |
(65 |
) |
|
$ |
23 |
|
|
$ |
2 |
|
|
$ |
36 |
|
|
$ |
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives in Cash Flow Hedging Relationships
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain (Loss) Reclassified from AOCI into Income |
|
|
|
|
|
(Effective Portion) |
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Interest rate swaps |
|
Net realized capital gains (losses) |
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
$ |
10 |
|
|
$ |
1 |
|
Interest rate swaps |
|
Net investment income (loss) |
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
(13 |
) |
Foreign currency swaps |
|
Net realized capital gains (losses) |
|
|
(53 |
) |
|
|
(23 |
) |
|
|
(71 |
) |
|
|
(65 |
) |
Foreign currency swaps |
|
Net investment income (loss) |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
$ |
(40 |
) |
|
$ |
(27 |
) |
|
$ |
(39 |
) |
|
$ |
(77 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of June 30, 2009, the before-tax deferred net gains on derivative instruments recorded in
AOCI that are expected to be reclassified to earnings during the next twelve months are $43. This
expectation is based on the anticipated interest payments on hedged investments in fixed maturity
securities that will occur over the next twelve months, at which time the Company will recognize
the deferred net gains (losses) as an adjustment to interest income over the term of the investment
cash flows. The maximum term over which the Company is hedging its exposure to the variability of
future cash flows (for forecasted transactions, excluding interest payments on existing
variable-rate financial instruments) is four years.
For the three and six months ended June 30, 2009, the Company had $1, before-tax, of net
reclassifications from AOCI to earnings resulting from the discontinuance of cash flow hedges due
to forecasted transactions that were no longer probable of occurring. For the three and six months
ended June 30, 2008, the Company had $(4), before-tax, of net reclassifications from AOCI to
earnings resulting from the discontinuance of cash flow hedges due to forecasted transactions that
were no longer probable of occurring.
41
THE HARTFORD FINANCIAL SERVICES GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
5. Investments and Derivative Instruments (continued)
Fair Value Hedges
For derivative instruments that are designated and qualify as a fair value hedge, the gain or loss
on the derivative as well as the offsetting loss or gain on the hedged item attributable to the
hedged risk are recognized in current earnings. The Company includes the gain or loss on the
derivative in the same line item as the offsetting loss or gain on the hedged item. All components
of each derivatives gain or loss were included in the assessment of hedge effectiveness.
The Company recognized in income gains (losses) representing the ineffective portion of all fair
value hedges as follows:
Derivatives in Fair Value Hedging Relationships
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain (Loss) Recognized in Income [1] |
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hedge |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hedge |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hedge |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hedge |
|
|
|
Derivative |
|
|
Item |
|
|
Derivative |
|
|
Item |
|
|
Derivative |
|
|
Item |
|
|
Derivative |
|
|
Item |
|
Interest rate swaps |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net realized capital gains (losses) |
|
$ |
49 |
|
|
$ |
(45 |
) |
|
$ |
84 |
|
|
$ |
(85 |
) |
|
$ |
66 |
|
|
$ |
(62 |
) |
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
$ |
(3 |
) |
Benefits, losses and loss adjustment expenses |
|
|
(26 |
) |
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
(29 |
) |
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
(42 |
) |
|
|
44 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
3 |
|
Foreign currency swaps |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net realized capital gains (losses) |
|
|
63 |
|
|
|
(63 |
) |
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
47 |
|
|
|
(47 |
) |
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
(24 |
) |
Benefits, losses and loss adjustment expenses |
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
(21 |
) |
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(20 |
) |
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
81 |
|
|
$ |
(76 |
) |
|
$ |
27 |
|
|
$ |
(28 |
) |
|
$ |
71 |
|
|
$ |
(65 |
) |
|
$ |
4 |
|
|
$ |
(4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1] |
|
The amounts presented do not include the periodic net coupon settlements of the derivative
or the coupon income (expense) related to the hedged item. The net of the amounts presented
represents the ineffective portion of the hedge. |
Non-qualifying Strategies
For non-qualifying strategies, including embedded derivatives that are required to be bifurcated
from their host contracts and accounted for as derivatives, the gain or loss on the derivative is
recognized currently in earnings within net realized capital gains or losses. The following table
presents the gain or loss recognized in income on non-qualifying strategies:
Non-qualifying Strategies
Gain (Loss) Recognized within Net Realized Capital Gains (Losses)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Interest rate swaps, caps, floors, and forwards |
|
$ |
5 |
|
|
$ |
(19 |
) |
|
$ |
20 |
|
|
$ |
22 |
|
Foreign currency swaps, forwards, and swaptions |
|
|
(32 |
) |
|
|
(12 |
) |
|
|
(22 |
) |
|
|
(18 |
) |
Credit derivatives that purchase credit protection |
|
|
(279 |
) |
|
|
(48 |
) |
|
|
(390 |
) |
|
|
89 |
|
Credit derivatives that assume credit risk |
|
|
157 |
|
|
|
(27 |
) |
|
|
77 |
|
|
|
(372 |
) |
Contingent capital facility put option |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
(3 |
) |
Japanese fixed annuity hedging instruments [1] |
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
(141 |
) |
|
|
(118 |
) |
|
|
41 |
|
GMAB product derivatives |
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
(23 |
) |
Japan 3Win hedging derivatives [2] |
|
|
119 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(110 |
) |
|
|
|
|
GMWB product derivatives |
|
|
2,622 |
|
|
|
317 |
|
|
|
3,345 |
|
|
|
(906 |
) |
GMWB reinsurance contracts |
|
|
(433 |
) |
|
|
(46 |
) |
|
|
(685 |
) |
|
|
112 |
|
GMWB hedging instruments |
|
|
(1,518 |
) |
|
|
(284 |
) |
|
|
(1,400 |
) |
|
|
45 |
|
Equity index swaps, options, and futures |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Japanese variable annuity hedging instruments |
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
(13 |
) |
|
|
(19 |
) |
|
|
(10 |
) |
Macro hedge program |
|
|
(568 |
) |
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
(364 |
) |
|
|
5 |
|
Warrants |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
70 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
118 |
|
|
$ |
(279 |
) |
|
$ |
398 |
|
|
$ |
(1,018 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1] |
|
The associated liability is adjusted for changes in spot rates
through realized capital gains and losses and was $(54) and $121
for the three months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively,
and $151 and $(82) for the six months ended June 30, 2009 and
2008, respectively. |
|
[2] |
|
The associated liability is adjusted for changes in spot rates
through realized capital gains and losses and was $(44) for the
three months ended June 30, 2009 and $140 for the six months ended
June 30, 2009. |
42
THE HARTFORD FINANCIAL SERVICES GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
5. Investments and Derivative Instruments (continued)
For the three and six months ended June 30, 2009, the net realized capital gain of $118 and
$398, respectively, related to derivatives used in non-qualifying strategies was primarily due to
the following:
|
|
The net gain associated with GMWB related derivatives was primarily due to market-based
valuation changes, including a decrease in equity volatility levels and an increase in
interest rates, as well as policyholder behavior and liability model assumption updates. For
more information on the policyholder behavior and liability model assumption updates, refer to
Note 4. |
|
|
The net gain on the Japanese fixed annuity and Japan 3Win hedging instruments for the three
months ended June 30, 2009, was primarily due to weakening of the U.S. dollar against the
Japanese Yen and an increase in U.S. interest rates. The net loss for the six months ended
June 30, 2009, was primarily due to the Japanese Yen weakening against the U.S. dollar. |
|
|
The net loss on the macro hedge program was primarily the result of an increase in the
equity markets and the impact of trading activity. |
|
|
The net loss on credit derivatives that purchase credit protection to economically hedge
fixed maturity securities and the net gain on credit derivatives that assume credit risk as a
part of replication transactions resulted from credit spreads tightening. |
For the three and six months ended June 30, 2008, the net realized capital loss related to
derivatives used in non-qualifying strategies of $(279) and $(1,018), respectively, was primarily
due to the following:
|
|
The net losses on GMWB related derivatives for the six months ended June 30, 2008, were
primarily due to the transition to SFAS 157 and liability model assumption updates for
mortality. |
|
|
The net losses on credit derivatives were comprised of losses in the first quarter on
credit derivatives that assume credit risk as a part of replication transactions due to credit
spreads widening and losses in the second quarter on credit derivatives that purchase credit
protection to economically hedge fixed maturity securities due to credit spreads tightening
significantly on certain referenced corporate entities. |
|
|
The net losses for three months ended June 30, 2008, on the Japanese fixed annuity hedging
instruments were primarily due to a weakening of the Japanese yen in comparison to the U.S.
dollar as well as an increase in Japanese interest rates. |
Refer to Note 9 for additional disclosures regarding contingent credit related features in
derivative agreements.
Credit Risk Assumed through Credit Derivatives
The Company enters into credit default swaps that assume credit risk from a single entity,
referenced index, or asset pool in order to synthetically replicate investment transactions. The
Company will receive periodic payments based on an agreed upon rate and notional amount and will
only make a payment if there is a credit event. A credit event payment will typically be equal to
the notional value of the swap contract less the value of the referenced security issuers debt
obligation. A credit event is generally defined as a default on contractually obligated interest
or principal payments or bankruptcy of the referenced entity. The credit default swaps in which
the Company assumes credit risk primarily reference investment grade single corporate issuers and
baskets, which include trades ranging from baskets of up to five corporate issuers to standard and
customized diversified portfolios of corporate issuers. The diversified portfolios of corporate
issuers are established within sector concentration limits and are typically divided into tranches
that possess different credit ratings.
The following tables present the notional amount, fair value, weighted average years to maturity,
underlying referenced credit obligation type and average credit ratings, and offsetting notional
amounts and fair value for credit derivatives in which the Company is assuming credit risk as of
June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008.
As
of June 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Underlying Referenced |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credit Obligation(s) [1] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
Average |
|
Offsetting |
|
|
|
|
Credit Derivative type by |
|
Notional |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Years to |
|
|
|
Credit |
|
Notional |
|
|
Offsetting |
|
derivative risk exposure |
|
Amount [2] |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Maturity |
|
Type |
|
Rating |
|
Amount [3] |
|
|
Fair Value [3] |
|
Single name credit default swaps |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment grade risk exposure |
|
$ |
360 |
|
|
$ |
3 |
|
|
5 years |
|
Corporate Credit/ Foreign Gov. |
|
AAA- |
|
$ |
335 |
|
|
$ |
(21 |
) |
Below investment grade risk exposure |
|
|
105 |
|
|
|
(11 |
) |
|
4 years |
|
Corporate Credit |
|
B |
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
Basket credit default swaps [4] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment grade risk exposure |
|
|
1,764 |
|
|
|
(170 |
) |
|
5 years |
|
Corporate Credit |
|
BBB+ |
|
|
989 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
Investment grade risk exposure |
|
|
525 |
|
|
|
(225 |
) |
|
8 years |
|
CMBS Credit |
|
AA |
|
|
525 |
|
|
|
225 |
|
Below investment grade risk exposure |
|
|
200 |
|
|
|
(150 |
) |
|
5 years |
|
Corporate Credit |
|
BBB+ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credit linked notes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment grade risk exposure |
|
|
87 |
|
|
|
78 |
|
|
2 years |
|
Corporate Credit |
|
BBB+ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
3,041 |
|
|
$ |
(475 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,879 |
|
|
$ |
212 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
43
THE HARTFORD FINANCIAL SERVICES GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
5. Investments and Derivative Instruments (continued)
As of December 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Underlying Referenced |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credit Obligation(s) [1] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
Average |
|
Offsetting |
|
|
|
|
Credit Derivative type by |
|
Notional |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Years to |
|
|
|
Credit |
|
Notional |
|
|
Offsetting |
|
derivative risk exposure |
|
Amount[2] |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Maturity |
|
Type |
|
Rating |
|
Amount[3] |
|
|
Fair Value[3] |
|
Single name credit default swaps |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment grade risk exposure |
|
$ |
60 |
|
|
$ |
(1 |
) |
|
4 years |
|
Corporate Credit |
|
A- |
|
$ |
35 |
|
|
$ |
(9 |
) |
Below investment grade risk exposure |
|
|
82 |
|
|
|
(19 |
) |
|
4 years |
|
Corporate Credit |
|
B- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basket credit default swaps [4] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment grade risk exposure |
|
|
1,778 |
|
|
|
(235 |
) |
|
5 years |
|
Corporate Credit |
|
A- |
|
|
1,003 |
|
|
|
21 |
|
Investment grade risk exposure |
|
|
275 |
|
|
|
(92 |
) |
|
8 years |
|
CMBS Credit |
|
AAA |
|
|
275 |
|
|
|
92 |
|
Below investment grade risk exposure |
|
|
200 |
|
|
|
(166 |
) |
|
6 years |
|
Corporate Credit |
|
BB+ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credit linked notes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment grade risk exposure |
|
|
117 |
|
|
|
106 |
|
|
2 years |
|
Corporate Credit |
|
BBB+ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
2,512 |
|
|
$ |
(407 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,313 |
|
|
$ |
104 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1] |
|
The average credit ratings are based on availability and the
midpoint of the applicable ratings among Moodys, S&P, and Fitch.
If no rating is available from a rating agency, then an internally
developed rating is used. |
|
[2] |
|
Notional amount is equal to the maximum potential future loss
amount. There is no specific collateral related to these
contracts or recourse provisions included in the contracts to
offset losses. |
|
[3] |
|
The Company has entered into offsetting credit default swaps to
terminate certain existing credit default swaps, thereby
offsetting the future changes in value of, or losses paid related
to, the original swap. |
|
[4] |
|
Includes $2.2 billion and $1.9 billion as of June 30, 2009 and
December 31, 2008, respectively, of standard market indices of
diversified portfolios of corporate issuers referenced through
credit default swaps. These swaps are subsequently valued based
upon the observable standard market index. Also includes $325 as
of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, of customized diversified
portfolios of corporate issuers referenced through credit default
swaps. |
6. Deferred Policy Acquisition Costs and Present Value of Future Profits
Changes in deferred policy acquisition costs and present value of future profits by Life and
Property & Casualty were as follows:
Life
Unlock Results
During the second quarter of 2009, the Company revised its estimation of future gross profits using
a Reversion to Mean (RTM) estimation technique to estimate future separate account returns.
RTM is an estimation technique commonly used by insurance entities to project future separate
account returns. Through this estimation technique, the Companys DAC model will be adjusted to
reflect actual account values at the end of each quarter and through a consideration of recent
returns, we will adjust future projected returns over a five year period so that the account value
returns to the long-term expected rate of return, providing that those projected returns for the
next five years do not exceed certain caps or floors. This will result in a DAC unlock, described
below, each quarter. However, benefits and assessments used in the determination of SOP 03-1
reserves will be derived from a set of stochastic scenarios that have been calibrated to our
reversion to mean separate account returns. The policy related in-force or account values at June
30, 2009 were used to project future gross profits using this new separate account return estimate.
The after-tax impact on the Companys assets and liabilities as a result of the Unlock, which
applied the RTM estimation technique, for the three months ended June 30, 2009 was:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Death and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unearned |
|
|
Income |
|
|
Sales |
|
|
|
|
|
Segment |
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue |
|
|
Benefit |
|
|
Inducement |
|
|
|
|
|
After-tax (Charge) Benefit |
|
DAC |
|
|
Reserves |
|
|
Reserves [1] |
|
|
Assets |
|
Total |
|
Retail |
|
$ |
163 |
|
|
$ |
(21 |
) |
|
$ |
98 |
|
|
$ |
13 |
|
|
$ |
253 |
|
Retirement Plans |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
Individual Life |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
International [2] |
|
|
(11 |
) |
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
117 |
|
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
104 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
156 |
|
|
$ |
(16 |
) |
|
$ |
215 |
|
|
$ |
5 |
|
|
$ |
360 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1] |
|
As a result of the Unlock, death benefit reserves, in Retail, decreased $307, pre-tax, offset by a decrease of $157, pre-tax, in
reinsurance recoverables. In International, death benefit reserves decreased $184 pre-tax, offset by an increase of $4, pre-tax, in
reinsurance recoverables. |
|
[2] |
|
Includes $(49) related to DAC recoverability impairment associated with the decision to suspend sales in the U.K. variable annuity business. |
44
THE HARTFORD FINANCIAL SERVICES GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
6. Deferred Policy Acquisition Costs and Present Value of Future Profits (continued)
In addition, during the first quarter of 2009, the Company failed its quarterly tests
resulting in an Unlock of future estimated gross profits. The policy related in-force or account
values at March 31, 2009 were used to project future gross profits. The after-tax impact on the
Companys assets and liabilities as a result of the first quarter Unlock, based on our quantitative
and qualitative tests and the second quarter Unlock using the RTM estimation technique, for the six
months ended June 30, 2009 was:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Death and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unearned |
|
|
Income |
|
|
Sales |
|
|
|
|
Segment |
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue |
|
|
Benefit |
|
|
Inducement |
|
|
|
|
After-tax (Charge) Benefit |
|
DAC |
|
|
Reserves |
|
|
Reserves [1] |
|
|
Assets |
|
|
Total [2] |
|
Retail |
|
$ |
(503 |
) |
|
$ |
31 |
|
|
$ |
(230 |
) |
|
$ |
(30 |
) |
|
$ |
(732 |
) |
Retirement Plans |
|
|
(53 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(56 |
) |
Individual Life |
|
|
(64 |
) |
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(24 |
) |
International |
|
|
(99 |
) |
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
(216 |
) |
|
|
(9 |
) |
|
|
(318 |
) |
Corporate |
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
(723 |
) |
|
$ |
77 |
|
|
$ |
(448 |
) |
|
$ |
(40 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,134 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1] |
|
As a result of the Unlock, death benefit reserves, in Retail,
increased $741, pre-tax, offset by an increase of $386, pre-tax,
in reinsurance recoverables. In International, death benefit
reserves increased $352, pre-tax, offset by a decrease of $20,
pre-tax, in reinsurance recoverables. |
|
[2] |
|
The most significant contributor to the Unlock amounts recorded
during the first quarter of 2009 were as a result of actual
separate account returns from the period ending October 1, 2008 to
March 31, 2009 being significantly below our aggregated estimated
return. |
Changes in deferred policy acquisition costs and present value of future profits were as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Balance, January 1 |
|
$ |
11,988 |
|
|
$ |
10,514 |
|
Deferred costs |
|
|
418 |
|
|
|
841 |
|
Amortization Deferred policy acquisition costs and present value of future profits [1] |
|
|
(824 |
) |
|
|
(230 |
) |
Amortization Unlock, pre-tax |
|
|
(1,068 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Adjustments to unrealized gains and losses on securities, available-for-sale and other [2] |
|
|
192 |
|
|
|
490 |
|
Effect of currency translation adjustment |
|
|
(99 |
) |
|
|
91 |
|
Effect of FSP FAS 115-2 [2] |
|
|
(78 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, June 30 |
|
$ |
10,529 |
|
|
$ |
11,706 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1] |
|
The increase in amortization from the prior year period is due to
lower actual gross profits in 2008 resulting from increased
realized capital losses primarily from the adoption of SFAS 157 at
the beginning of the first quarter of 2008. |
|
[2] |
|
The effect of adopting FSP FAS 115-2 resulted in an increase to
retained earnings and as a result a DAC charge of $78. In
addition, an offsetting amount was recorded in unrealized losses
as unrealized losses increased upon adoption of FSP FAS 115-2. |
Property & Casualty
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Balance, January 1 |
|
$ |
1,260 |
|
|
$ |
1,228 |
|
Deferred costs |
|
|
1,032 |
|
|
|
1,062 |
|
Amortization Deferred policy acquisition costs |
|
|
(1,041 |
) |
|
|
(1,044 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, June 30 |
|
$ |
1,251 |
|
|
$ |
1,246 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
45
THE HARTFORD FINANCIAL SERVICES GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
7. Separate Accounts, Death Benefits and Other Insurance Benefit Features
The Company records the variable portion of individual variable annuities, 401(k),
institutional, 403(b)/457, private placement life and variable life insurance products within
separate account assets and liabilities. Separate account assets are reported at fair value.
Separate account liabilities are set equal to separate account assets. Separate account assets are
segregated from other investments. Investment income and gains and losses from those separate
account assets, which accrue directly to, and whereby investment risk is borne by the policyholder,
are offset by the related liability changes within the same line item in the condensed consolidated
statements of operations. The fees earned for administrative and contract holder maintenance
services performed for these separate accounts are included in fee income. For the three and six
months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, there were no gains or losses on transfers of assets from the
general account to the separate account.
Many of the variable annuity and universal life (UL) contracts issued by the Company offer
various guaranteed minimum death, withdrawal, income, accumulation, and UL secondary guarantee
benefits. UL secondary guarantee benefits ensure that the policy will not terminate, and will
continue to provide a death benefit, even if there is insufficient policy value to cover the
monthly deductions and charges. Guaranteed minimum death and income benefits are offered in
various forms as described in further detail throughout this Note 7. The Company reinsures a
portion of the death benefit guarantees associated with its in-force block of business. Changes in
the gross U.S. GMDB, Japan GMDB/guaranteed minimum income
benefits (GMIB), and UL secondary guarantee benefits sold with annuity and/or UL products
accounted for and collectively known as SOP 03-1 reserve liabilities are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
UL Secondary |
|
|
|
U.S. GMDB [1] |
|
|
Japan GMDB/GMIB [1] |
|
|
Guarantees [1] |
|
Liability balance as of January 1, 2009 |
|
$ |
870 |
|
|
$ |
229 |
|
|
$ |
40 |
|
Incurred |
|
|
185 |
|
|
|
60 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
Paid |
|
|
(293 |
) |
|
|
(66 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Unlock |
|
|
742 |
|
|
|
350 |
|
|
|
|
|
Currency translation adjustment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liability balance as of June 30, 2009 |
|
$ |
1,504 |
|
|
$ |
567 |
|
|
$ |
54 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1] |
|
The reinsurance recoverable asset related to the U.S. GMDB was $927 as of June 30, 2009.
The reinsurance recoverable asset related to the Japan GMDB was $41 as of June 30, 2009.
The reinsurance recoverable asset related to the UL secondary guarantees was $19 as of June
30, 2009. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
UL Secondary |
|
|
|
U.S. GMDB [1] |
|
|
Japan GMDB/GMIB [1] |
|
|
Guarantees [1] |
|
Liability balance as of January 1, 2008 |
|
$ |
529 |
|
|
$ |
42 |
|
|
$ |
19 |
|
Incurred |
|
|
84 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
Paid |
|
|
(67 |
) |
|
|
(13 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Currency translation adjustment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liability balance as of June 30, 2008 |
|
$ |
546 |
|
|
$ |
44 |
|
|
$ |
25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1] |
|
The reinsurance recoverable asset related to the U.S. GMDB was $338 as of June 30, 2008.
The reinsurance recoverable asset related to the Japan GMDB was $7 as of June 30, 2008. The
reinsurance recoverable asset related to the UL secondary guarantees was $12 as of June 30,
2008. |
The net SOP 03-1 reserve liabilities are established by estimating the expected value of net
reinsurance costs and death and income benefits in excess of the projected account balance. The
excess death and income benefits and net reinsurance costs are recognized ratably over the
accumulation period based on total expected assessments. The SOP 03-1 reserve liabilities are
recorded in reserve for future policy benefits in the Companys condensed consolidated balance
sheets. Changes in the SOP 03-1 reserve liabilities are recorded in benefits, losses and loss
adjustment expenses in the Companys condensed consolidated statements of operations. In a manner
consistent with the Companys accounting policy for deferred acquisition costs, the Company
regularly evaluates estimates used and adjusts the additional liability balances, with a related
charge or credit to benefit expense if actual experience or other evidence suggests that earlier
assumptions should be revised.
46
THE HARTFORD FINANCIAL SERVICES GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
7. Separate Accounts, Death Benefits and Other Insurance Benefit Features (continued)
The following table provides details concerning GMDB and GMIB exposure as of June 30, 2009:
Breakdown of Individual Variable and Group Annuity Account Value by GMDB/GMIB Type
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retained Net |
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
Account |
|
|
Net Amount |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Attained Age of |
|
Maximum anniversary value (MAV) [1] |
|
Value |
|
|
at Risk [9] |
|
|
at Risk [9] |
|
|
Annuitant |
|
MAV only |
|
$ |
25,259 |
|
|
$ |
12,600 |
|
|
$ |
4,164 |
|
|
|
66 |
|
With 5% rollup [2] |
|
|
1,835 |
|
|
|
1,016 |
|
|
|
413 |
|
|
|
65 |
|
With Earnings Protection Benefit Rider (EPB) [3] |
|
|
5,280 |
|
|
|
2,091 |
|
|
|
217 |
|
|
|
63 |
|
With 5% rollup & EPB |
|
|
729 |
|
|
|
346 |
|
|
|
68 |
|
|
|
65 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total MAV |
|
|
33,103 |
|
|
|
16,053 |
|
|
|
4,862 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset Protection Benefit (APB) [4] |
|
|
25,761 |
|
|
|
8,334 |
|
|
|
5,432 |
|
|
|
64 |
|
Lifetime Income Benefit (LIB) [5] |
|
|
1,164 |
|
|
|
407 |
|
|
|
407 |
|
|
|
62 |
|
Reset [6] (5-7 years) |
|
|
3,402 |
|
|
|
943 |
|
|
|
942 |
|
|
|
70 |
|
Return of Premium [7]/Other |
|
|
18,434 |
|
|
|
3,124 |
|
|
|
2,915 |
|
|
|
63 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal U.S. Guaranteed Minimum Death Benefits [10] |
|
|
81,864 |
|
|
$ |
28,861 |
|
|
$ |
14,558 |
|
|
|
65 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: General Account Value Subject to U.S.
Guaranteed Minimum Death Benefits |
|
|
6,961 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal Separate Account Liabilities Subject to
U.S. Guaranteed Minimum Death Benefits |
|
|
74,903 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Separate Account Liabilities Not Subject to U.S.
Guaranteed Minimum Death Benefits |
|
|
59,043 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Separate Account Liabilities |
|
$ |
133,946 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Japan Guaranteed Minimum Death and Income Benefit
[8] |
|
$ |
29,272 |
|
|
$ |
6,904 |
|
|
$ |
5,765 |
|
|
|
67 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1] |
|
MAV: the death benefit is the greatest of current account value, net premiums paid and the highest account value on
any anniversary before age 80 (adjusted for withdrawals). |
|
[2] |
|
Rollup: the death benefit is the greatest of the MAV, current account value, net premium paid and premiums (adjusted
for withdrawals) accumulated at generally 5% simple interest up to the earlier of age 80 or 100% of adjusted premiums. |
|
[3] |
|
EPB: the death benefit is the greatest of the MAV, current account value, or contract value plus a percentage of the
contracts growth. The contracts growth is account value less premiums net of withdrawals, subject to a cap of 200%
of premiums net of withdrawals. |
|
[4] |
|
APB: the death benefit is the greater of current account value or MAV, not to exceed current account value plus 25%
times the greater of net premiums and MAV (each adjusted for premiums in the past 12 months). |
|
[5] |
|
LIB: the death benefit is the greatest of current account value, net premiums paid, or for certain contracts a benefit
amount that ratchets over time, generally based on market performance. |
|
[6] |
|
Reset: the death benefit is the greatest of current account value, net premiums paid and the most recent five to seven
year anniversary account value before age 80 (adjusted for withdrawals). |
|
[7] |
|
Return of premium: the death benefit is the greater of current account value and net premiums paid. |
|
[8] |
|
Death benefits include a Return of Premium and MAV (before age 80) paid in a single lump sum. The income benefit is a
guarantee to return initial investment, adjusted for earnings liquidity, paid through a fixed annuity, after a minimum
deferral period of 10, 15 or 20 years. The guaranteed remaining balance related to the Japan GMIB was $28.1 billion
and $30.6 billion as of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively. |
|
[9] |
|
Net amount at risk is defined as the guaranteed benefit in excess of the current account value. Retained net amount at
risk is net amount at risk reduced by that amount which has been reinsured to third parties. Net amount at risk and
retained net amount at risk are highly sensitive to equity markets movements for example, as equity market declines,
net amount at risk and retained net amount at risk will generally increase. |
|
[10] |
|
Account value includes the contractholders investment in the separate account and the
general account. |
Account balances of contracts with guarantees were invested in variable separate accounts as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset type |
|
As of June 30, 2009 |
|
|
As of December 31, 2008 |
|
Equity securities (including mutual funds) |
|
$ |
65,476 |
|
|
$ |
63,114 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
9,427 |
|
|
|
10,174 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
74,903 |
|
|
$ |
73,288 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of June 30, 2009, approximately 16% of the equity securities above were invested in fixed income
securities through these funds and approximately 84% were invested in equity securities.
See Note 4 for a description of the Companys guaranteed living benefits that are accounted for at
fair value.
47
THE HARTFORD FINANCIAL SERVICES GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
8. Sales Inducements
The Company currently offers enhanced crediting rates or bonus payments to contract holders on
certain of its individual and group annuity products. The expense associated with offering a bonus
is deferred and amortized over the life of the related contract in a pattern consistent with the
amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs. Consistent with the Companys Unlocks in the
six months
ended June 30, 2009, the Company unlocked the amortization of the sales inducement asset. See Note
6 for more information concerning the Unlocks.
Changes in deferred sales inducement activity were as follows for the six months ended June 30:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Balance, January 1 |
|
$ |
553 |
|
|
$ |
467 |
|
Sales inducements deferred |
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
83 |
|
Amortization |
|
|
(80 |
) |
|
|
(6 |
) |
Amortization Unlock |
|
|
(57 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, end of period, June 30 |
|
$ |
450 |
|
|
$ |
544 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9. Commitments and Contingencies
Litigation
The Hartford is involved in claims litigation arising in the ordinary course of business, both as a
liability insurer defending or providing indemnity for third-party claims brought against insureds
and as an insurer defending coverage claims brought against it. The Hartford accounts for such
activity through the establishment of unpaid loss and loss adjustment expense reserves. Subject to
the uncertainties discussed below under the caption Asbestos and Environmental Claims, management
expects that the ultimate liability, if any, with respect to such ordinary-course claims
litigation, after consideration of provisions made for potential losses and costs of defense, will
not be material to the consolidated financial condition, results of operations or cash flows of The
Hartford.
The Hartford is also involved in other kinds of legal actions, some of which assert claims for
substantial amounts. These actions include, among others, putative state and federal class actions
seeking certification of a state or national class. Such putative class actions have alleged, for
example, underpayment of claims or improper underwriting practices in connection with various kinds
of insurance policies, such as personal and commercial automobile, property, life and inland
marine; improper sales practices in connection with the sale of life insurance and other investment
products; and improper fee arrangements in connection with investment products and structured
settlements. The Hartford also is involved in individual actions in which punitive damages are
sought, such as claims alleging bad faith in the handling of insurance claims. Like many other
insurers, The Hartford also has been joined in actions by asbestos plaintiffs asserting, among
other things, that insurers had a duty to protect the public from the dangers of asbestos and that
insurers committed unfair trade practices by asserting defenses on behalf of their policyholders in
the underlying asbestos cases. Management expects that the ultimate liability, if any, with
respect to such lawsuits, after consideration of provisions made for estimated losses, will not be
material to the consolidated financial condition of The Hartford. Nonetheless, given the large or
indeterminate amounts sought in certain of these actions, and the inherent unpredictability of
litigation, an adverse outcome in certain matters could, from time to time, have a material adverse
effect on the Companys consolidated results of operations or cash flows in particular quarterly or
annual periods.
Broker Compensation Litigation Following the New York Attorney Generals filing of a civil
complaint against Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc., and Marsh, Inc. (collectively, Marsh) in
October 2004 alleging that certain insurance companies, including The Hartford, participated with
Marsh in arrangements to submit inflated bids for business insurance and paid contingent
commissions to ensure that Marsh would direct business to them, private plaintiffs brought several
lawsuits against the Company predicated on the allegations in the Marsh complaint, to which the
Company was not party. Among these is a multidistrict litigation in the United States District
Court for the District of New Jersey. There are two consolidated amended complaints filed in the
multidistrict litigation, one related to conduct in connection with the sale of property-casualty
insurance and the other related to alleged conduct in connection with the sale of group benefits
products. The Company and various of its subsidiaries are named in both complaints. The
complaints assert, on behalf of a putative class of persons who purchased insurance through broker
defendants, claims under the Sherman Act, the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act
(RICO), state law, and in the case of the group benefits complaint, claims under the Employee
Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA). The claims are predicated upon allegedly
undisclosed or otherwise improper payments of contingent commissions to the broker defendants to
steer business to the insurance company defendants. The district court has dismissed the Sherman
Act and RICO claims in both complaints for failure to state a claim and has granted the defendants
motions for summary judgment on the ERISA claims in the group-benefits products complaint. The
district court further has declined to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the state law
claims, has dismissed those state law claims without prejudice, and has closed both cases. The
plaintiffs have appealed the dismissal of the claims in both consolidated amended complaints,
except the ERISA claims.
48
THE HARTFORD FINANCIAL SERVICES GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
9. Commitments and Contingencies (continued)
The Company is also a defendant in two consolidated securities actions and two consolidated
derivative actions filed in the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut. The
consolidated securities actions assert claims on behalf of a putative class of shareholders
alleging that the Company and certain of its executive officers violated Section 10(b) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 by failing to disclose to the investing public that
The Hartfords business and growth was predicated on the unlawful activity alleged in the New York
Attorney Generals complaint against Marsh. The consolidated derivative actions, brought by
shareholders on behalf of the Company against its directors and an additional executive officer,
allege that the defendants knew adverse non-public information about the activities alleged in the
Marsh complaint and concealed and misappropriated that information to make profitable stock trades
in violation of their duties to the Company. In July 2006, the district court granted defendants
motion to dismiss the consolidated securities actions, and the plaintiffs appealed. In November
2008, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit vacated the decision and remanded
the case to the district court. In May 2009, the parties reached an agreement in principle to
settle the consolidated securities actions for an immaterial amount. The settlement is subject to
certain contingencies, including the execution of a stipulation of settlement and the preliminary
and final approval of the court. Defendants filed a motion to dismiss the consolidated derivative
actions in May 2005. In July 2009, the parties reached an agreement in principle to settle the
consolidated derivative actions for an immaterial amount, subject to the execution of a written
settlement agreement and approval of the court.
In September 2007, the Ohio Attorney General filed a civil action in Ohio state court alleging that
certain insurance companies, including The Hartford, conspired with Marsh in violation of Ohios
antitrust statute. The trial court denied defendants motion to dismiss the complaint in July
2008. The Company disputes the allegations and intends to defend this action vigorously.
Investment and Savings Plan ERISA Class Action Litigation In November and December 2008,
following a decline in the share price of the Companys common stock, seven putative class action
lawsuits were filed in the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut on behalf
of certain participants in the Companys Investment and Savings Plan (the Plan), which offers the
Companys common stock as one of many investment options. These lawsuits have been consolidated,
and a consolidated amended class-action complaint was filed in March 2009, alleging that the
Company and certain of its officers and employees violated ERISA by allowing the Plans
participants to invest in the Companys common stock and by failing to disclose to the Plans
participants information about the Companys financial condition. The lawsuit seeks restitution or
damages for losses arising from the investment of the Plans assets in the Companys common stock
during the period from December 10, 2007 to the present. The Company disputes the allegations and
intends to defend the actions vigorously.
Structured Settlement Class Action In October 2005, a putative nationwide class action was filed
in the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut against the Company and several
of its subsidiaries on behalf of persons who had asserted claims against an insured of a Hartford
property & casualty insurance company that resulted in a settlement in which some or all of the
settlement amount was structured to afford a schedule of future payments of specified amounts
funded by an annuity from a Hartford life insurance company (Structured Settlements). The
operative complaint alleges that since 1997 the Company has systematically deprived the settling
claimants of the value of their damages recoveries by secretly deducting 15% of the annuity premium
of every Structured Settlement to cover brokers commissions, other fees and costs, taxes, and a
profit for the annuity provider, and asserts claims under the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt
Organizations Act (RICO) and state law. The plaintiffs seek compensatory damages, punitive
damages, pre-judgment interest, attorneys fees and costs, and injunctive or other equitable
relief. The Company vigorously denies that any claimant was misled or otherwise received less than
the amount specified in the structured-settlement agreements. In March 2009, the district court
certified a class for the RICO and fraud claims composed of all persons, other than those
represented by a plaintiffs broker, who entered into a Structured Settlement since 1997 and
received certain written representations about the cost or value of the settlement. The district
court declined to certify a class for the breach-of-contract and unjust-enrichment claims. The
Company has petitioned the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit for permission to
file an interlocutory appeal of the class-certification ruling. Proceedings in the district court
are stayed until proceedings in the Second Circuit conclude.
Fair Credit Reporting Act Class Action In February 2007, the United States District Court for the
District of Oregon gave final approval of the Companys settlement of a lawsuit brought on behalf
of a class of homeowners and automobile policy holders alleging that the Company willfully violated
the Fair Credit Reporting Act by failing to send appropriate notices to new customers whose initial
rates were higher than they would have been had the customer had a more favorable credit report.
The Company paid approximately $84.3 to eligible claimants and their counsel in connection with the
settlement, and sought reimbursement from the Companys Excess Professional Liability Insurance
Program for the portion of the settlement in excess of the Companys $10 self-insured retention.
Certain insurance carriers participating in that program disputed coverage for the settlement, and
one of the excess insurers commenced an arbitration that resulted in an award in the Companys
favor and payments to the Company of approximately $30.1, thereby exhausting the primary and
first-layer excess policies. In June 2009, the second-layer excess carriers commenced an
arbitration to resolve the dispute over coverage for the remainder of the amounts paid by the
Company. Management believes it is probable that the Companys coverage position ultimately will
be sustained.
49
THE HARTFORD FINANCIAL SERVICES GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
9. Commitments and Contingencies (continued)
Asbestos and Environmental Claims As discussed in Note 12, Commitments and Contingencies, of
the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements under the caption Asbestos and Environmental
Claims, included in the Companys 2008 Form 10-K Annual Report, The Hartford continues to receive
asbestos and environmental claims that involve significant uncertainty regarding policy coverage
issues. Regarding these claims, The Hartford continually reviews its overall reserve levels and
reinsurance coverages, as well as the methodologies it uses to estimate its exposures. Because of
the significant uncertainties that limit the ability of insurers and reinsurers to estimate the
ultimate reserves necessary for unpaid losses and related expenses, particularly those related to
asbestos, the ultimate liabilities may exceed the currently recorded reserves. Any such additional
liability cannot be reasonably estimated now but could be material to The Hartfords consolidated
operating results, financial condition and liquidity.
Shareholder Demand Like the boards of directors of many other companies, The Hartfords board of
directors (the Board) has received a demand from SEIU Pension Plans Master Trust, which purports
to be a current holder of the Companys common stock. The demand requests the Board to bring suit
to recover alleged excessive compensation paid to senior executives of the Company from 2005
through the present and to change the Companys executive compensation structure. The Board is
conducting an investigation of the allegations in the demand.
Derivative Commitments
Certain of the Companys derivative agreements contain provisions that are tied to the financial
strength ratings of the individual legal entity that entered into the derivative agreement as set
by nationally recognized statistical rating agencies. If the insurance operating entitys
financial strength were to fall below certain ratings, the counterparties to the derivative
agreements could demand immediate and ongoing full collateralization and in certain instances
demand immediate settlement of all outstanding derivative positions traded under each impacted
bilateral agreement. The settlement amount is determined by netting the derivative positions
transacted under each agreement. If the termination rights were to be exercised by the
counterparties, it could impact the insurance operating entitys ability to conduct hedging
activities by increasing the associated costs and decreasing the willingness of counterparties to
transact with the insurance operating entity. The aggregate fair value of all derivative
instruments with credit-risk-related contingent features that are in a net liability position as of
June 30, 2009, is $695. Of this $695, the insurance operating entities have posted collateral of
$594 in the normal course of business. Based on derivative market values as of June 30, 2009, a
downgrade of one level below the current financial strength ratings by either Moodys or S&P could
require approximately an additional $45 to be posted as collateral. Based on derivative market
values as of June 30, 2009, a downgrade by either Moodys or S&P of two levels below the insurance
operating entities current financial strength ratings could require approximately an additional
$80 of assets to be posted as collateral. These collateral amounts could change as derivative
market values change, as a result of changes in our hedging activities or to the extent changes in
contractual terms are negotiated. The nature of the collateral that we may be required to post is
primarily in the form of U.S. Treasury bills and U.S. Treasury notes.
50
THE HARTFORD FINANCIAL SERVICES GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
10. Pension Plans and Postretirement Health Care and Life Insurance Benefit Plans
Components of Net Periodic Benefit Cost
Total net periodic benefit cost for the three months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 include the
following components:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension Benefits |
|
|
Other Postretirement Benefits |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Service cost |
|
$ |
26 |
|
|
$ |
30 |
|
|
$ |
2 |
|
|
$ |
1 |
|
Interest cost |
|
|
61 |
|
|
|
58 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
Expected return on plan assets |
|
|
(68 |
) |
|
|
(69 |
) |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
(3 |
) |
Amortization of prior service credit |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
Amortization of actuarial loss |
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net periodic benefit cost |
|
$ |
35 |
|
|
$ |
32 |
|
|
$ |
5 |
|
|
$ |
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net periodic benefit cost for the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 include the
following components:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension Benefits |
|
|
Other Postretirement Benefits |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Service cost |
|
$ |
52 |
|
|
$ |
60 |
|
|
$ |
3 |
|
|
$ |
3 |
|
Interest cost |
|
|
121 |
|
|
|
114 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
Expected return on plan assets |
|
|
(137 |
) |
|
|
(138 |
) |
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
(6 |
) |
Amortization of prior service credit |
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
Amortization of actuarial loss |
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net periodic benefit cost |
|
$ |
68 |
|
|
$ |
60 |
|
|
$ |
9 |
|
|
$ |
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11. Stock Compensation Plans
The Company has two primary stock-based compensation plans, The Hartford 2005 Incentive Stock
Plan and The Hartford Employee Stock Purchase Plan. For a description of these plans, see Note 18
of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in The Hartfords 2008 Form 10-K Annual
Report.
Shares issued in satisfaction of stock-based compensation may be made available from authorized but
unissued shares, shares held by the Company in treasury or from shares purchased in the open
market. The Company typically issues shares from treasury in satisfaction of stock-based
compensation. The compensation expense recognized for the stock-based
compensation plans was $8
and $21 for the three months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively. The compensation expense
recognized for the stock-based compensation plans was $21 and $39 for the six months ended June 30,
2009 and 2008, respectively. The income tax benefit recognized for stock-based compensation plans
was $3 and $6 for the three months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively. The income tax
benefit recognized for stock-based compensation plans was $7 and $12 for the six months ended June
30, 2009 and 2008, respectively. The Company did not capitalize any cost of stock-based
compensation. As of June 30, 2009, the total compensation cost related to non-vested awards not
yet recognized was $92, which is expected to be recognized over a
weighted average period of 2.2
years.
12. Debt
Commercial Paper
The Federal Reserve Board authorized the Commercial Paper Funding Facility (CPFF) on October 7,
2008 under Section 13(3) of the Federal Reserve Act to provide a liquidity backstop to U.S. issuers
of commercial paper. As a result of ratings downgrades in the first quarter of 2009, the Company
was required to pay the commercial paper issued under the CPFF program from existing sources of
liquidity. As of April 30, 2009, the Company has repaid commercial paper of $375, representing the
full amount issued under the CPFF, at their maturity dates. As of June 30, 2009, the Company has
no outstanding commercial paper.
51
THE HARTFORD FINANCIAL SERVICES GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
13. Equity
Stockholders Equity
Conversion of outstanding preferred to common stock
On January 9, 2009, Allianz SE converted its 6,048,387 shares of Series D Preferred Stock into
24,193,548 shares of common stock.
Conversion of preferred stock underlying Allianz warrants to common stock
On March 26, 2009, the Companys shareholders approved the conversion of the Series C Preferred
Stock underlying certain warrants issued to Allianz in October 2008 into 34,308,872 shares of The
Hartfords common stock. As a result of this shareholder approval, the Company is not obligated to
pay Allianz any cash payment related to these warrants and therefore these warrants no longer
provide for any form of net cash settlement outside the Companys control. As such, the warrants
to purchase the Series C Preferred Stock were reclassified from other liabilities to equity at
their fair value. As of March 26, 2009, the fair value of these warrants was $93. For the six
months ended June 30, 2009, the Company recognized a gain of $70, representing the change in fair
value of the warrants through March 26, 2009.
Increase in authorized shares
On May 27, 2009, at the Companys annual meeting of shareholders, shareholders approved an increase
in the aggregate authorized number of shares of common stock from 750 million to 1.5 billion.
Discretionary equity issuance program
On June 12, 2009, the Company announced that it commenced a discretionary equity issuance program,
and in accordance with that program entered into an equity distribution agreement pursuant to which
it is offering up to 60 million shares of its common stock from time to time for aggregate sales
proceeds of up to $750. Through July 29, 2009, The Hartford has issued 1.3 million shares of
common stock with net proceeds of $16 under this program.
The Companys participation in the Capital Purchase Program
On June 26, 2009, as part of the Capital Purchase Program (CPP) established by the U.S.
Department of the Treasury (Treasury) under the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008 (the
EESA), the Company entered into a Private Placement Purchase Agreement with Treasury pursuant to
which the Company issued and sold to Treasury 3,400,000 shares of the Companys Fixed Rate
Cumulative Perpetual Preferred Stock, Series E, having a liquidation preference of $1,000 per share
(the Series E Preferred Stock), and a ten-year warrant to purchase up to 52,093,973 shares of the
Companys common stock, par value $0.01 per share, at an initial exercise price of $9.79 per share,
for an aggregate purchase price of $3.4 billion.
Cumulative dividends on the Series E Preferred Stock will accrue on the liquidation preference at a
rate of 5% per annum for the first five years, and at a rate of 9% per annum thereafter. The Series
E Preferred Stock has no maturity date and ranks senior to the Companys common stock. The Series
E Preferred Stock is non-voting.
The Company may redeem the Series E Preferred Stock with the consent of the Office of Thrift
Supervisor, after consultation with the U.S. Treasury.
Upon issuance, the fair values of the Series E Preferred Stock and the associated warrants were
computed as if the instruments were issued on a stand alone basis. The fair value of the Series E
Preferred Stock was estimated based on a five-year holding period and cash flows discounted at a
rate of 13% resulting in a fair value estimate of approximately $2.5 billion. The Company used a
Black-Scholes options pricing model including an adjustment for American-style options to estimate
the fair value of the warrants, resulting in a stand alone fair value of approximately $400. The
most significant and unobservable assumption in this valuation was the Companys share price
volatility. The Company used a long-term realized volatility of the Companys stock of 62%. In
addition, the Company assumed a dividend yield of 1.72%.
The individual fair values were then used to record the Series E Preferred Stock and associated
warrants on a relative fair value basis of $2.9 billion and $480, respectively, consistent with the
guidance in APB Opinion No. 14, Accounting for Convertible Debt and Debt Issued with Stock
Purchase Warrants. The warrants of $480 were recorded to Additional Paid-in Capital as permanent
equity. The Series E Preferred Stock amount was recorded at the liquidation value of $1,000 per
share or $3.4 billion, net of discount of $480. The discount is being amortized over a five-year
period from the date of issuance, using the effective yield method and is recorded as a direct
reduction to retained earnings and deducted from income available to common stockholders in the
calculation of earnings per share. The amortization of discount totaled $1 for the three months
ended June 30, 2009.
52
THE HARTFORD FINANCIAL SERVICES GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
13. Equity (continued)
Extension of Allianz warrants and contingent liability payment
The Company also has an agreement that, for the one-year period following October 17, 2008, it will
pay certain amounts to Allianz if the Company effects or agrees to effect any transaction (or
series of transactions) pursuant to which any person or group (within the meaning of the U.S.
federal securities laws) is issued common stock or certain equity-related instruments constituting
more than 5% of the Companys fully-diluted common stock outstanding at the time for an effective
price per share (determined as provided in the Investment Agreement) of less than $25.32. Amounts
so payable depend on the effective price for the applicable transaction (or the weighted average
price for a series of transactions) and equal $50 if the effective price per share is between
$25.31 and $23.00, $150 if the effective price per share is between $22.99 and $20.00, $200 if the
effective price per share is between $19.99 and $15.00 and $300 if the effective price per share is
$14.99 or less.
The issuance of warrants to Treasury triggered the contingency payment in the Investment Agreement
related to additional investors. Upon receipt of preliminary approval to participate in the CPP,
The Hartford reinitiated negotiations with Allianz to modify the form of the $300 contingency
payment. The settlement of the contingency payment was renegotiated to, among other things, allow
Allianz an extension of the exercise period of its outstanding warrants and to reduce the amount of
the cash payment due to Allianz to $200, which will be paid on October 15, 2009. The Hartford
recorded a liability for the cash payment and an adjustment to additional paid-in capital for the
warrant modification resulting in a net realized capital loss of approximately $300.
Noncontrolling Interests
The Company adopted SFAS 160 on January 1, 2009. The scope of this Statement applies to all
entities that prepare consolidated financial statements and as such, includes VIEs in which the
Company has concluded that it is the primary beneficiary. See Note 5 for further discussion of the
Companys involvement in VIEs. The Company also holds the majority interest in certain general
account mutual funds, in which it has provided seed money. The scope of SFAS 160 also applies to
these mutual fund investments. Upon adoption of SFAS 160, the Company reclassified $92 as of
January 1, 2008 from liabilities to equity, representing the noncontrolling interest of other
investors in these VIEs and mutual fund investments. The noncontrolling interest within these
entities is likely to change, as these entities represent investment vehicles whereby investors may
frequently redeem or contribute to these investments. As such, the change in noncontrolling
ownership interest represented in the Companys Condensed Consolidated Statement of Changes in
Equity will primarily represent redemptions and additional subscriptions within these investment
vehicles.
The following table represents the change in noncontrolling ownership interest recorded in the
Companys Condensed Statement of Changes in Equity for the VIEs and mutual fund seed investments as
of June 30, 2009 and 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Redemptions of The Hartfords interest in VIEs and mutual fund
seed investments resulting in deconsolidation [1] |
|
$ |
(42 |
) |
|
$ |
(12 |
) |
Net (redemptions) and subscriptions from noncontrolling interests |
|
|
(23 |
) |
|
|
69 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total change in noncontrolling interest ownership |
|
$ |
(65 |
) |
|
$ |
57 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1] |
|
The redemptions of The Hartfords interest in VIEs and mutual fund seed investments for the
six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 resulted in a loss of $6 and gain of $1, respectively
which were recognized in realized capital gains (losses). |
53
THE HARTFORD FINANCIAL SERVICES GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
14. Goodwill
The carrying amount of goodwill allocated to reporting segments as of June 30, 2009 and
December 31, 2008 is shown below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
Life |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Retail |
|
$ |
159 |
|
|
$ |
159 |
|
Individual Life |
|
|
224 |
|
|
|
224 |
|
Retirement Plans |
|
|
87 |
|
|
|
79 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Life |
|
|
470 |
|
|
|
462 |
|
Property & Casualty |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Personal Lines |
|
|
119 |
|
|
|
119 |
|
Specialty Commercial |
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Property & Casualty |
|
|
149 |
|
|
|
149 |
|
Corporate |
|
|
585 |
|
|
|
449 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Goodwill |
|
$ |
1,204 |
|
|
$ |
1,060 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Companys goodwill impairment test performed during the first quarter of 2009 for the Life
reporting units, resulted in a write-down of $32 in the Institutional reporting unit of Corporate.
Goodwill within Corporate is primarily attributed to the Companys buy-back of Life in 2000 and
is allocated to the various Life reporting units. As a result of rating agency downgrades of
Lifes financial strength ratings during the first quarter of 2009 and high credit spreads related
to The Hartford, during the first quarter of 2009, the Company believed its ability to generate new
business in the Institutional reporting unit would remain pressured for ratings-sensitive products.
The Company believed goodwill associated with the Institutional line of business was impaired due
to the pressure on new sales for Institutionals ratings-sensitive business and the significant
unrealized losses in Institutionals investment portfolios.
On June 24, 2009, the Company completed the acquisition of Federal Trust Corporation, which
resulted in additional goodwill of $168 in Corporate.
15. Sale of First State Management Group
On March 31, 2009, the Company sold First State Management Group, Inc. (FSMG), its core
excess and surplus lines property business, to Beazley Group PLC (Beazley) for $27, resulting in
a gain on sale of $18, before-tax, and $12, after-tax. Included in the sale were approximately $4
in net assets of FSMG and the sale price is adjustable subsequent to closing based on the value of
the net assets at the closing date. The net assets sold to Beazley did not include invested
assets, unearned premium or deferred policy acquisition costs related to the in-force book of
business. Rather, the in-force book of business was ceded to Beazley under a separate reinsurance
agreement, whereby the Company ceded $26 of unearned premium, net of $10 in ceding commission.
Under the terms of the purchase and sale agreement, the Company continues to be obligated for all
losses and loss adjustment expenses incurred on or before March 31, 2009. The retained net loss
and loss adjustment expense reserves totaled $145 as of June 30, 2009.
54
THE HARTFORD FINANCIAL SERVICES GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
16. Acquisition of Federal Trust Corporation
On June 24, 2009, the Company acquired 100% of the equity interests in Federal Trust
Corporation (FTC), a savings and loan holding company, for $10, enabling the Company to
participate in the CPP. The acquisition resulted in goodwill of $168. The goodwill generated is
due, in part, to the fair value discount on mortgage loans acquired in comparison to their
expected cash flows. Mortgage loans acquired were fair valued at $288. Other assets acquired
included $27 of fixed maturity securities, $46 of short-term investments and $3 of cash.
Liabilities assumed include other liabilities of $389 in bank deposits and $149 in Federal Home
Loan Bank advances and long-term debt of $25. The acquired assets and liabilities have been stated
at preliminary estimates of fair value. These fair values are subject to adjustment based upon
managements subsequent receipt of additional information but are not expected to be material. The
Company expects to be completed with its fair value estimates as of June 30, 2010. The Company
contributed $185 to FTC in June 2009 and received $20 in full repayment of amounts lent to FTC in
March 2009.
Federal Trust Bank, an indirect wholly-owned subsidiary, (the Bank) is subject to certain
restrictions on the amount of dividends that it may declare and distribute to The Hartford without
prior regulatory notification or approval.
The Bank is also subject to various regulatory capital requirements administered by the federal
banking agencies. Failure to meet minimum capital requirements can initiate certain mandatory and
possibly additional discretionary actions by regulators that, if undertaken, could have a direct
material effect on the Banks financial statements. Under capital adequacy guidelines and the
regulatory framework for prompt corrective action, the Bank must meet specific capital guidelines
that involve quantitative measures of the Banks assets, liabilities and certain off-balance-sheet
items as calculated under regulatory accounting practices. The Banks capital amounts and
classification are also subject to qualitative judgments by the regulators about components, risk
weightings and other factors.
The following tables summarize the capital thresholds for the minimum and well capitalized
designations at June 30, 2009. An institutions capital category is based on whether it meets the
threshold for all three capital ratios within the category. At June 30, 2009, the Banks Tier 1
capital ratio was 5.1%. The Bank was designated as a well capitalized institution at June 30,
2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
To Be Well Capitalized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Under Prompt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For Minimum Capital |
|
|
Corrective Action |
|
|
|
Actual |
|
|
Adequacy Purposes |
|
|
Provisions |
|
At June 30, 2009 |
|
Amount |
|
|
% |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
% |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
% |
|
Total capital (to risk-weighted assets) |
|
$ |
29.4 |
|
|
|
10.4 |
% |
|
$ |
22.6 |
|
|
|
8.0 |
% |
|
$ |
28.2 |
|
|
|
10.0 |
% |
Tier I capital (to risk-weighted assets) |
|
$ |
29.4 |
|
|
|
10.4 |
% |
|
$ |
11.3 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
% |
|
$ |
16.9 |
|
|
|
6.0 |
% |
Tier I capital (to average adjusted assets) |
|
$ |
29.4 |
|
|
|
5.1 |
% |
|
$ |
23.1 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
% |
|
$ |
28.8 |
|
|
|
5.0 |
% |
17. Restructuring, Severance and Other Costs
In the second quarter of 2009, the Company completed a review of several strategic
alternatives with a goal of preserving capital, reducing risk and stabilizing its ratings. These
alternatives included the potential restructuring, discontinuation or disposition of various
business lines. Following that review, the Company announced that it would suspend all new sales in
Internationals Japan and European operations and that it was evaluating strategic options with
respect to its Institutional businesses. The Company has also initiated plans to change the
management structure of the organization and fundamentally reorganize the nature and focus of the
Companys operations. These plans will result in termination benefits to current employees, costs
to terminate leases and other contracts and asset impairment charges. The Company intends to
complete these restructuring activities and execute final payment by December 2010.
Termination benefits related to workforce reductions have been accrued in accordance with SFAS No.
112, Employers Accounting for Postemployment Benefits (SFAS 112), through June 30, 2009.
Termination benefits related to workforce reductions and lease terminations in accordance with SFAS
112 and SFAS No. 146, Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities (SFAS
146), are expected to be accrued in subsequent quarters, as appropriate. Asset impairment charges
have been and will be recorded in accordance with SFAS No. 144, Accounting for the Impairment or
Disposal of Long-Lived Assets (SFAS 144).
The following pre-tax charges were incurred in the Companys Life operations during the three
months ended June 30, 2009 in connection with the restructuring initiatives previously announced:
|
|
|
|
|
Severance benefits |
|
$ |
35 |
|
Asset impairment charges |
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total severance and other costs for the three months ended June 30, 2009 |
|
$ |
72 |
|
|
|
|
|
Amounts incurred during the three months ended June 30, 2009 were recorded in the Life Other
segment as other expenses. It is expected that the total Life costs associated with restructuring,
severance and other costs will be approximately $120 $130, pre-tax, with the additional costs
attributable mainly to the costs to exit various contracts. The Company may incur additional
restructuring, severance or other costs in Property & Casualty and Corporate in subsequent
quarters. As of June 30, 2009, these costs are not estimable.
55
|
|
|
Item 2. |
|
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS |
(Dollar amounts in millions except share data unless otherwise stated)
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (MD&A)
addresses the financial condition of The Hartford Financial Services Group, Inc. and its
subsidiaries (collectively, The Hartford or the Company) as of June 30, 2009, compared with
December 31, 2008, and its results of operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009,
compared to the equivalent 2008 periods. This discussion should be read in conjunction with the
MD&A in The Hartfords 2008 Form 10-K Annual Report.
Certain of the statements contained herein are forward-looking statements. These forward-looking
statements are made pursuant to the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation
Reform Act of 1995 and include estimates and assumptions related to economic, competitive and
legislative developments. These forward-looking statements are subject to change and uncertainties
that are, in many instances, beyond the Companys control and have been made based upon
managements expectations and beliefs concerning future developments and their potential effect
upon the Company. There can be no assurance that future developments will be in accordance with
managements expectations or that the effect of future developments on The Hartford will be those
anticipated by management. Actual results could differ materially from those expected by the
Company, depending on the outcome of various factors, including, but not limited to, those set
forth in Part II, Item 1A, Risk Factors as well as Part II, Item 1A, Risk Factors of The Hartfords
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2009 and Part I, Item 1A, Risk
Factors in The Hartfords 2008 Form 10-K Annual Report. These important risks and uncertainties
include, without limitation, uncertainties related to the depth and duration of the current
recession and financial market conditions, which could continue to pressure our capital position
and adversely affect the Companys business and results; the extent of the impact on the Companys
results and prospects of recent downgrades in the Companys financial strength and credit ratings
and the impact of any further downgrades on the Companys business and results; the success of
managements initiatives to stabilize the Companys ratings and mitigate and reduce risks
associated with various business lines; the additional restrictions, oversight, costs and other
potential consequences of the Companys participation in the Capital Purchase Program under the
Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008; changes in financial and capital markets, including
changes in interest rates, credit spreads, equity prices and foreign exchange rates; the inability
to effectively mitigate the impact of equity market volatility on the Companys financial position
and results of operations arising from obligations under annuity product guarantees; the amount of
statutory capital that the Company has, changes to the statutory reserves and/or risk based capital
requirements, and the Companys ability to hold and protect sufficient statutory capital to
maintain financial strength and credit ratings; the possibility of general economic and business
conditions that are less favorable than anticipated; the potential for differing interpretations of
the methodologies, estimations and assumptions that underlie the valuation of the Companys
financial instruments that could result in changes to investment valuations; the subjective
determinations that underlie the Companys evaluation of other-than-temporary impairments on
available-for-sale securities; losses due to nonperformance or defaults by others; the availability
of our commercial paper program; the potential for further acceleration of DAC amortization; the
potential for further impairments of our goodwill; the difficulty in predicting the Companys
potential exposure for asbestos and environmental claims; the possible occurrence of terrorist
attacks; the response of reinsurance companies under reinsurance contracts and the availability,
pricing and adequacy of reinsurance to protect the Company against losses; the possibility of
unfavorable loss development; the incidence and severity of catastrophes, both natural and
man-made; stronger than anticipated competitive activity; unfavorable judicial or legislative
developments; the potential effect of domestic and foreign regulatory developments, including those
which could increase the Companys business costs and required capital levels; the Companys
ability to distribute its products through distribution channels, both current and future; the
uncertain effects of emerging claim and coverage issues; the ability of the Companys subsidiaries
to pay dividends to the Company; the Companys ability to adequately price its property and
casualty policies; the ability to recover the Companys systems and information in the event of a
disaster or other unanticipated event; potential for difficulties arising from outsourcing
relationships; potential changes in federal or state tax laws, including changes impacting the
availability of the separate account dividend received deduction; the Companys ability to protect
its intellectual property and defend against claims of infringement; and other factors described in
such forward-looking statements.
INDEX
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
57 |
|
|
|
|
|
57 |
|
|
|
|
|
63 |
|
|
|
|
|
71 |
|
|
|
|
|
83 |
|
|
|
|
|
85 |
|
|
|
|
|
87 |
|
|
|
|
|
88 |
|
|
|
|
|
89 |
|
|
|
|
|
91 |
|
|
|
|
|
92 |
|
|
|
|
|
93 |
|
|
|
|
|
107 |
|
|
|
|
|
108 |
|
|
|
|
|
112 |
|
|
|
|
|
117 |
|
|
|
|
|
121 |
|
|
|
|
|
125 |
|
|
|
|
|
129 |
|
|
|
|
|
135 |
|
|
|
|
|
136 |
|
|
|
|
|
148 |
|
|
|
|
|
152 |
|
|
|
|
|
159 |
|
56
OVERVIEW
The Hartford is an insurance and financial services company with operations dating back to
1810. The Company is headquartered in Connecticut and is organized into two major operations: Life
and Property & Casualty, each containing reporting segments. Within the Life and Property &
Casualty operations, The Hartford conducts business principally in eleven reporting segments.
Corporate primarily includes the Companys debt financing and related interest expense, as well as
other capital raising activities, banking operations and certain purchase accounting adjustments.
To present its operations in a more meaningful and organized way, management has included separate
overviews within the Life and Property & Casualty sections of MD&A. For further overview of Lifes
profitability and analysis, see page 71. For further overview of Property & Casualtys
profitability and analysis, see page 93.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING ESTIMATES
The preparation of financial statements, in conformity with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States of America (U.S. GAAP), requires management to make estimates and
assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent
assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues
and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
The Company has identified the following estimates as critical in that they involve a higher degree
of judgment and are subject to a significant degree of variability: property and casualty reserves,
net of reinsurance; life estimated gross profits used in the valuation and amortization of assets
and liabilities associated with variable annuity and other universal life-type contracts; living
benefits required to be fair valued; valuation of investments and derivative instruments;
evaluation of other-than-temporary impairments on available-for-sale securities; pension and other
postretirement benefit obligations; contingencies relating to corporate litigation and regulatory
matters; and goodwill impairment. Certain of these estimates are particularly sensitive to market
conditions, and deterioration and/or volatility in the worldwide debt or equity markets could have
a material impact on the condensed consolidated financial statements. In developing these
estimates management makes subjective and complex judgments that are inherently uncertain and
subject to material change as facts and circumstances develop. Although variability is inherent in
these estimates, management believes the amounts provided are appropriate based upon the facts
available upon compilation of the financial statements. For a discussion of the critical
accounting estimates not discussed below, see MD&A in The Hartfords 2008 Form 10-K Annual Report.
Life Estimated Gross Profits Used in the Valuation and Amortization of Assets and Liabilities
Associated with Variable Annuity and Other Universal Life-Type Contracts
Accounting Policy and Assumptions
Lifes deferred policy acquisition costs asset and present value of future profits (PVFP)
intangible asset (hereafter, referred to collectively as DAC) related to investment contracts and
universal life-type contracts (including variable annuities) are amortized in the same way, over
the estimated life of the contracts acquired using the retrospective deposit method. Under the
retrospective deposit method, acquisition costs are amortized in proportion to the present value of
estimated gross profits (EGPs). EGPs are also used to amortize other assets and liabilities on
the Companys balance sheet, such as sales inducement assets and unearned revenue reserves (URR).
Components of EGPs are used to determine reserves for guaranteed minimum death, income and
universal life secondary guarantee benefits accounted for and collectively referred to as SOP 03-1
reserves. The specific breakdown of the most significant EGP based balances by segment is as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Individual Variable Annuities U.S. |
|
|
Individual Variable Annuities Japan |
|
|
Individual Life |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
DAC |
|
$ |
3,754 |
|
|
$ |
4,844 |
|
|
$ |
1,590 |
|
|
$ |
1,834 |
|
|
$ |
2,743 |
|
|
$ |
2,931 |
|
Sales Inducements |
|
$ |
334 |
|
|
$ |
436 |
|
|
$ |
27 |
|
|
$ |
19 |
|
|
$ |
38 |
|
|
$ |
36 |
|
URR |
|
$ |
63 |
|
|
$ |
109 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,176 |
|
|
$ |
1,299 |
|
SOP 03-1 reserves |
|
$ |
1,502 |
|
|
$ |
867 |
|
|
$ |
567 |
|
|
$ |
229 |
|
|
$ |
54 |
|
|
$ |
40 |
|
For most contracts, the Company estimates gross profits over a 20-year horizon as estimated profits
emerging subsequent to that timeframe are immaterial. The Company uses other amortization bases
for amortizing DAC, such as gross costs (net of reinsurance), as a replacement for EGPs when EGPs
are expected to be negative for multiple years of the contracts life. Actual gross profits, in a
given reporting period, that vary from managements initial estimates result in increases or
decreases in the rate of amortization, commonly referred to as a true-up, which are recorded in
the current period.
Products sold in a particular year are aggregated into cohorts. Future gross profits for each
cohort are projected over the estimated lives of the underlying contracts, and are, to a large
extent, a function of future account value projections for variable annuity products and to a
lesser extent for variable universal life products. The projection of future account values
requires the use of certain assumptions. The assumptions considered to be important in the
projection of future account value, and hence the EGPs, include separate account fund
performance, which is impacted by separate account fund mix, less fees assessed against the
contract holders account balance, surrender and lapse rates, interest margin, mortality, and
hedging costs. The assumptions are developed as part of an on-going process and are dependent upon
the Companys current best estimates of future events.
57
Through March 31, 2009, the Company estimated gross profits using the mean of EGPs derived from a
set of stochastic scenarios that had been calibrated to our estimated separate account return.
Beginning in the second quarter of 2009, the Company estimated gross profits from a single
deterministic reversion-to-mean (RTM) separate account return projection. RTM is an estimation
technique commonly used by insurance entities to project future separate account returns. Through
this estimation technique, the Companys DAC model will be adjusted to reflect actual account
values at the end of each quarter and through a consideration of recent returns, we will adjust
future projected returns over a five-year period so that the account value returns to the long-term
expected rate of return, providing that those projected returns for the next five years do not
exceed certain caps or floors. This will result in a DAC unlock, described below, each quarter.
However, benefits and assessments used in the determination of SOP 03-1 reserves will still be
derived from a set of stochastic scenarios that have been calibrated to our reversion to mean
separate account returns. Under RTM, the Company makes the following assumptions about the asset
categories that comprise separate accounts:
|
|
|
Equities: The reversion period combines a five-year prospective period and a look-back
period to April 1, 2009 intended to reflect the results of recent historical market
experience. The expected long-term equity rate of return on the U.S. and Japan equity
asset classes is 9.5% and 8.5%, respectively, subject to a 15% cap. |
|
|
|
Fixed Income: The expected long-term fixed income rate of return on the U.S. and Japan
fixed income asset classes is 6.0% and 4.0%, respectively. |
The following table summarizes the general impacts to individual variable annuity EGPs and earnings
for DAC amortization caused by changes in separate account returns, mortality and future lapse rate
assumptions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impact on Earnings for DAC |
Assumption |
|
Impact to EGPs |
|
Amortization |
Expected long-term rates
of returns increase
|
|
Increase: As
expected fee income
would increase and
expected claims
would decrease.
|
|
Benefit |
|
|
|
|
|
Expected long-term rates
of returns decrease
|
|
Decrease: As
expected fee income
would decrease and
expected claims
would increase.
|
|
Charge |
|
|
|
|
|
Future mortality increases
|
|
Decrease: As
expected fee income
would decrease
because the time
period in which
fees would be
collected would be
reduced and claims
would increase.
|
|
Charge |
|
|
|
|
|
Future mortality decreases
|
|
Increase: As
expected fee income
would increase
because the time
period in which
fees would be
collected would
increase and claims
would decrease.
|
|
Benefit |
|
|
|
|
|
Future lapse rate increases
|
|
Decrease: As
expected fee income
would decrease
because the time
period in which
fees would be
collected would be
reduced at a
greater rate than
claims would
decrease. [1]
|
|
Charge [1] |
|
|
|
|
|
Future lapse rate decreases
|
|
Increase: As
expected fee income
would increase
because the time
period in which
fees would be
collected would
increase at a
greater rate than
claims would
increase. [1]
|
|
Benefit [1] |
|
|
|
[1] |
|
If a contract is significantly in-the-money such that expected lifetime claims exceed
lifetime fee income, this relationship would reverse. |
58
In addition to changes to the assumptions described above, changes to other policyholder
behaviors such as resets, partial surrenders, reaction to price increases, and asset allocations
could cause EGPs to fluctuate.
Estimating future gross profits is complex and requires considerable judgment and the forecasting
of events well into the future. Even though the Company has adopted a reversion to mean estimation
technique for determining future separate account returns, the Company will continue to complete a
comprehensive assumption study and refine its estimate of future gross profits, as a result of that
study, during the third quarter of each year. Upon completion of an assumption study, the Company
revises its assumptions to reflect its current best estimate, thereby changing its estimate of
projected account values and the related EGPs in the DAC, sales inducement and unearned revenue
reserve amortization models as well as SOP 03-1 reserving models. The DAC asset, as well as the
sales inducement asset, unearned revenue reserves and SOP 03-1 reserves are adjusted with an
offsetting benefit or charge to income to reflect such changes in the period of the revision. All
assumption changes that affect the estimate of future EGPs including the update of current account
values, the use of the RTM estimation technique or policyholder behavior assumptions are considered
an unlock in the period of revision. An Unlock that results in an after-tax benefit generally
occurs as a result of actual experience or future expectations of product profitability being
favorable compared to previous estimates. An Unlock that results in an after-tax charge generally
occurs as a result of actual experience or future expectations of product profitability being
unfavorable compared to previous estimates.
Prior to adopting the RTM estimation technique for determining future separate account returns, in
addition to the comprehensive assumption study performed in the third quarter of each year,
revisions to best estimate assumptions used to estimate future gross profits were also necessary
when the EGPs in the Companys models fell outside of an independently determined reasonable range
of EGPs. In addition, the Company considered, on a quarterly basis, other qualitative factors such
as product, regulatory and policyholder behavior trends and would also revise EGPs if those trends
were expected to be significant and were not or could not be included in the statistically
significant ranges of reasonable EGPs. After reviewing both the quantitative test results and
certain qualitative factors as of March 31, 2009, the Company determined an interim Unlock was
necessary.
Unlock
As a result of strong returns on the equity markets, offset by credit spread compression on the
Companys general account bond portfolio, the after-tax impact on the Companys assets and
liabilities as a result of the Unlock, which applied the RTM estimation technique, for the three
months ended June 30, 2009 was:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Death and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unearned |
|
|
Income |
|
|
Sales |
|
|
|
|
|
Segment |
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue |
|
|
Benefit |
|
|
Inducement |
|
|
|
|
|
After-tax (Charge) Benefit |
|
DAC |
|
|
Reserves |
|
|
Reserves [1] |
|
|
Assets |
|
|
Total |
|
Retail |
|
$ |
163 |
|
|
$ |
(21 |
) |
|
$ |
98 |
|
|
$ |
13 |
|
|
$ |
253 |
|
Retirement Plans |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
Individual Life |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
International [2] |
|
|
(11 |
) |
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
117 |
|
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
104 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
156 |
|
|
$ |
(16 |
) |
|
$ |
215 |
|
|
$ |
5 |
|
|
$ |
360 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1] |
|
As a result of the Unlock, death benefit reserves, in Retail, decreased $307, pre-tax, offset by a decrease of $157, pre-tax, in
reinsurance recoverables. In International, death benefit reserves decreased $184, pre-tax, offset by an increase of $4, pre-tax, in
reinsurance recoverables. |
[2] |
|
Includes $(49) related to DAC recoverability impairment associated with the decision to suspend sales in the U.K. variable annuity business. |
The after-tax impact on the Companys assets and liabilities as a result of the Unlock in the
first quarter based on our quantitative and qualitative tests and the second quarter, based on the
RTM estimation technique, for the six months ended June 30, 2009 was:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Death and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unearned |
|
|
Income |
|
|
Sales |
|
|
|
|
|
Segment |
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue |
|
|
Benefit |
|
|
Inducement |
|
|
|
|
|
After-tax (Charge) Benefit |
|
DAC |
|
|
Reserves |
|
|
Reserves [1] |
|
|
Assets |
|
|
Total [2] |
|
Retail |
|
$ |
(503 |
) |
|
$ |
31 |
|
|
$ |
(230 |
) |
|
$ |
(30 |
) |
|
$ |
(732 |
) |
Retirement Plans |
|
|
(53 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(56 |
) |
Individual Life |
|
|
(64 |
) |
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(24 |
) |
International |
|
|
(99 |
) |
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
(216 |
) |
|
|
(9 |
) |
|
|
(318 |
) |
Corporate |
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
(723 |
) |
|
$ |
77 |
|
|
$ |
(448 |
) |
|
$ |
(40 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,134 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1] |
|
As a result of the Unlock, death benefit reserves, in Retail,
increased $741, pre-tax, offset by an increase of $386, pre-tax,
in reinsurance recoverables. In International, death benefit
reserves increased $352, pre-tax, offset by a decrease of $20,
pre-tax, in reinsurance recoverables. |
[2] |
|
The most significant contributor to the Unlock amounts recorded
during the first quarter of 2009 were as a result of actual
separate account returns from the period ending October 1, 2008 to
March 31, 2009 being significantly below our aggregated estimated
return. |
59
An Unlock only revises EGPs to reflect current best estimate assumptions. With or without
an Unlock, and even after an Unlock occurs, the Company must also test the aggregate recoverability
of the DAC and sales inducement assets by comparing the existing DAC balance to the present value
of future EGPs. In addition, the Company routinely stress tests its DAC and sales inducement assets
for recoverability against severe declines in its separate account assets, which could occur if the
equity markets experienced a significant sell-off, as the majority of policyholders funds in the
separate accounts is invested in the equity market. The Companys decision to suspend its
International sales negatively impacted the loss recognition testing on the DAC balance associated
with the U.K. variable annuity business. As a result, a $49 after-tax loss was reported in
earnings during the second quarter of 2009 and included in the Unlock results in the table above.
As of June 30, 2009, the Company believed U.S. individual and Japan individual variable annuity
EGPs could fall, through a combination of negative market returns, lapses and mortality, by at
least 30% and 65%, respectively, before portions of its DAC and sales inducement assets would be
unrecoverable.
Valuation of Investments and Derivative Instruments
The Hartfords investments in fixed maturities include bonds, redeemable preferred stock and
commercial paper. These investments, along with certain equity securities, which include common
and non-redeemable preferred stocks, are classified as available-for-sale (AFS) and are carried
at fair value. The after-tax difference from cost or amortized cost is reflected in stockholders
equity as a component of Other Comprehensive Income (OCI), after adjustments for the effect of
deducting the life and pension policyholders share of the immediate participation guaranteed
contracts and certain life and annuity deferred policy acquisition costs and reserve adjustments.
The equity investments associated with the variable annuity products offered in Japan are recorded
at fair value and are classified as trading with changes in fair value recorded in net investment
income. Policy loans are carried at outstanding balance. Mortgage loans on real estate are
recorded at the outstanding principal balance adjusted for amortization of premiums or discounts
and net of valuation allowances. Short-term investments are carried at amortized cost, which
approximates fair value. Limited partnerships and other alternative investments are reported at
their carrying value with the change in carrying value accounted for under the equity method and
accordingly the Companys share of earnings are included in net investment income. Recognition of
limited partnerships and other alternative investment income is delayed due to the availability of
the related financial statements, as private equity and other funds are generally on a three-month
delay and hedge funds are on a one-month delay. Accordingly, income for the three and six months
ended June 30, 2009 may not include the full impact of current year changes in valuation of the
underlying assets and liabilities, which are generally obtained from the partnerships general
partners. Other investments primarily consist of derivatives instruments which are carried at fair
value.
60
Valuation of Fixed Maturity, Short-Term and Equity Securities, Available-for-Sale
The fair value for fixed maturity, short-term and equity securities, available-for-sale, in an
active and orderly market (i.e. not distressed or forced liquidation) is determined by management
after considering one of three primary sources of information: third party pricing services,
independent broker quotations or pricing matrices. Security pricing is applied using a waterfall
approach whereby prices are first sought from third party pricing services, the remaining unpriced
securities are submitted to independent brokers for prices, or lastly, securities are priced using
a pricing matrix. Typical inputs used by these three pricing methods include, but are not limited
to, reported trades, benchmark yields, issuer spreads, bids, offers, and/or estimated cash flows
and prepayments speeds. Based on the typical trading volumes and the lack of quoted market prices
for fixed maturities, third party pricing services will normally derive the security prices through
recent reported trades for identical or similar securities making adjustments through the reporting
date based upon available market observable information as outlined above. If there are no recent
reported trades, the third party pricing services and brokers may use matrix or model processes to
develop a security price where future cash flow expectations are developed based upon collateral
performance and discounted at an estimated market rate. For further discussion, see the Valuation
of Fixed Maturity, Short-term and Equity Securities Available-for-Sale Section in Note 4 of the
Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
In accordance with SFAS 157, the Company has analyzed the third party pricing services valuation
methodologies and related inputs, and has also evaluated the various types of securities in its
investment portfolio to determine an appropriate SFAS 157 fair value hierarchy level based upon
trading activity and the observability of market inputs. For further discussion of SFAS 157, see
Note 4 of the Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
The following table presents the fair value of fixed maturity, short-term and equity securities,
available-for-sale, by pricing source and SFAS 157 hierarchy level as of June 30, 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted Prices in |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Active Markets |
|
|
Significant |
|
|
Significant |
|
|
|
|
|
|
for Identical |
|
|
Observable |
|
|
Unobservable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets |
|
|
Inputs |
|
|
Inputs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Level 1) |
|
|
(Level 2) |
|
|
(Level 3) |
|
|
Total |
|
Priced via third party pricing services |
|
$ |
512 |
|
|
$ |
53,898 |
|
|
$ |
1,738 |
|
|
$ |
56,148 |
|
Priced via independent broker quotations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,862 |
|
|
|
3,862 |
|
Priced via matrices |
|
|
|
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
5,528 |
|
|
|
5,536 |
|
Priced via other methods [1] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
103 |
|
|
|
527 |
|
|
|
630 |
|
Short-term investments [2] |
|
|
10,478 |
|
|
|
2,223 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,701 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
10,990 |
|
|
$ |
56,232 |
|
|
$ |
11,655 |
|
|
$ |
78,877 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of Total |
|
|
13.9 |
% |
|
|
71.3 |
% |
|
|
14.8 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1] |
|
Represents securities for which adjustments were made to reduce prices received from third parties and certain private
equity investments that are carried at the Companys determination of fair value from inception. |
|
[2] |
|
Short-term investments are primarily valued at amortized cost, which approximates fair value. |
The fair value of a financial instrument is the amount at which the instrument could be
exchanged in a current transaction between knowledgeable, unrelated willing parties using inputs,
including assumptions and estimates, a market participant would utilize. As the estimated fair
value of a financial instrument utilizes assumptions and estimates, the amount that may be realized
may differ significantly.
61
Valuation of Derivative Instruments, excluding embedded derivatives within liability contracts
Derivative instruments are reported on the consolidated balance sheets at fair value and are
reported in Other Investments and Other Liabilities. Derivative instruments are fair valued using
pricing valuation models, which utilize market data inputs or independent broker quotations. As of
June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, 95% and 94% of derivatives, respectively, based upon notional
values, were priced by valuation models, which utilize independent market data. The remaining
derivatives were priced by broker quotations. The derivatives are valued using mid-market level
inputs, with the exception of the customized swap contracts that
hedge guaranteed minimum withdrawal benefits (GMWB) liabilities, that are
predominantly observable in the market. Inputs used to value derivatives include, but are not
limited to, interest swap rates, foreign currency forward and spot rates, credit spreads and
correlations, interest and equity volatility and equity index levels. The Company performs a
monthly analysis on derivative valuations which includes both quantitative and qualitative
analysis. Examples of procedures performed include, but are not limited to, review of pricing
statistics and trends, back testing recent trades, analyzing the impacts of changes in the market
environment, and review of changes in market value for each derivative including those derivatives
priced by brokers.
The following table presents the notional value and net fair value of derivatives instruments by
SFAS 157 hierarchy level as of June 30, 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notional Value |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets (Level 1) |
|
$ |
2,650 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Significant observable inputs (Level 2) |
|
|
33,608 |
|
|
|
(95 |
) |
Significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) |
|
|
27,360 |
|
|
|
853 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
63,618 |
|
|
$ |
758 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table presents the notional value and net fair value of the derivative instruments
within the SFAS 157 Level 3 securities classification as of June 30, 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notional Value |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
Credit derivatives |
|
$ |
4,878 |
|
|
$ |
(266 |
) |
Interest derivatives |
|
|
2,918 |
|
|
|
(12 |
) |
Equity derivatives |
|
|
19,540 |
|
|
|
1,131 |
|
Other |
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Level 3 |
|
$ |
27,360 |
|
|
$ |
853 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative instruments classified as Level 3 include complex derivatives, primarily consisting of
equity options and swaps, interest rate derivatives which have interest rate optionality, certain
credit default swaps, and long-dated interest rate swaps. These derivative instruments are valued
using pricing models which utilize both observable and unobservable inputs and, to a lesser extent,
broker quotations. A derivative instrument that is priced using both observable and unobservable
inputs will be classified as a Level 3 financial instrument in its entirety if the unobservable
input is significant in developing the price. The Company utilizes derivative instruments to
manage the risk associated with certain assets and liabilities. However, the derivative instrument
may not be classified with the same fair value hierarchy level as the associated assets and
liabilities.
Evaluation of Other-Than-Temporary Impairments on Available-for-Sale Securities
One of the significant estimates related to AFS securities is the evaluation of investments for
other-than-temporary-impairments (impairment). The Company has a security monitoring process
overseen by a committee of investment and accounting professionals that identifies AFS securities
that are subjected to an enhanced evaluation on a quarterly basis to determine if an impairment is
present. This evaluation is a quantitative and qualitative process, which is subject to risks and
uncertainties and is intended to determine whether declines in the fair value of AFS securities
should be recognized in current period earnings. For further discussion of the accounting policy,
see the Recognition and Presentation of Other-Than-Temporary Impairments Section of Note 1 of the
Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements. For a discussion of results, see the
Other-Than-Temporary Impairment Losses Section of the MD&A.
62
CONSOLIDATED RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
Operating Summary |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
Change |
|
Earned premiums |
|
$ |
3,592 |
|
|
$ |
3,891 |
|
|
|
(8 |
%) |
|
$ |
7,421 |
|
|
$ |
7,734 |
|
|
|
(4 |
%) |
Fee income |
|
|
1,062 |
|
|
|
1,386 |
|
|
|
(23 |
%) |
|
|
2,229 |
|
|
|
2,723 |
|
|
|
(18 |
%) |
Net investment income (loss): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities available-for-sale and other |
|
|
1,021 |
|
|
|
1,230 |
|
|
|
(17 |
%) |
|
|
1,941 |
|
|
|
2,423 |
|
|
|
(20 |
%) |
Equity securities, trading [1] |
|
|
2,523 |
|
|
|
1,153 |
|
|
|
119 |
% |
|
|
1,799 |
|
|
|
(2,425 |
) |
|
NM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net investment income (loss) |
|
|
3,544 |
|
|
|
2,383 |
|
|
|
49 |
% |
|
|
3,740 |
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
NM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net realized capital gains (losses): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other-than-temporary impairment (OTTI)
losses |
|
|
(562 |
) |
|
|
(164 |
) |
|
NM |
|
|
|
(786 |
) |
|
|
(468 |
) |
|
|
(68 |
%) |
OTTI losses transferred to other comprehensive
income |
|
|
248 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
248 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net OTTI losses recognized in earnings |
|
|
(314 |
) |
|
|
(164 |
) |
|
|
(91 |
%) |
|
|
(538 |
) |
|
|
(468 |
) |
|
|
(15 |
%) |
Net realized capital losses, excluding net OTTI losses recognized in earnings |
|
|
(367 |
) |
|
|
(118 |
) |
|
NM |
|
|
|
(59 |
) |
|
|
(1,185 |
) |
|
|
95 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net realized capital losses |
|
|
(681 |
) |
|
|
(282 |
) |
|
|
(141 |
%) |
|
|
(597 |
) |
|
|
(1,653 |
) |
|
|
64 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other revenues |
|
|
120 |
|
|
|
125 |
|
|
|
(4 |
%) |
|
|
238 |
|
|
|
245 |
|
|
|
(3 |
%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
|
7,637 |
|
|
|
7,503 |
|
|
|
2 |
% |
|
|
13,031 |
|
|
|
9,047 |
|
|
|
44 |
% |
Benefits, losses and loss adjustment expenses |
|
|
3,092 |
|
|
|
3,586 |
|
|
|
(14 |
%) |
|
|
7,729 |
|
|
|
6,943 |
|
|
|
11 |
% |
Benefits, losses and loss adjustment expenses returns
credited on International variable annuities [1] |
|
|
2,523 |
|
|
|
1,153 |
|
|
|
119 |
% |
|
|
1,799 |
|
|
|
(2,425 |
) |
|
NM |
|
Amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs and
present value of future profits |
|
|
674 |
|
|
|
806 |
|
|
|
(16 |
%) |
|
|
2,933 |
|
|
|
1,274 |
|
|
|
130 |
% |
Insurance operating costs and expenses |
|
|
959 |
|
|
|
1,047 |
|
|
|
(8 |
%) |
|
|
1,857 |
|
|
|
1,997 |
|
|
|
(7 |
%) |
Interest expense |
|
|
119 |
|
|
|
77 |
|
|
|
55 |
% |
|
|
239 |
|
|
|
144 |
|
|
|
66 |
% |
Goodwill impairment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other expenses |
|
|
252 |
|
|
|
182 |
|
|
|
38 |
% |
|
|
441 |
|
|
|
371 |
|
|
|
19 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total benefits, losses and expenses |
|
|
7,619 |
|
|
|
6,851 |
|
|
|
11 |
% |
|
|
15,030 |
|
|
|
8,304 |
|
|
|
81 |
% |
Income (loss) before income taxes |
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
652 |
|
|
|
(97 |
%) |
|
|
(1,999 |
) |
|
|
743 |
|
|
NM |
|
Income tax expense (benefit) |
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
109 |
|
|
|
(70 |
%) |
|
|
(775 |
) |
|
|
55 |
|
|
NM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
(15 |
) |
|
$ |
543 |
|
|
NM |
|
|
$ |
(1,224 |
) |
|
$ |
688 |
|
|
NM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1] |
|
Includes investment income and mark-to-market effects of equity securities, trading, supporting the international variable annuity
business, which are classified in net investment income with corresponding amounts credited to policyholders within benefits, losses and
loss adjustment expenses.
|
63
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
Segment Results |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
Change |
|
Life |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retail |
|
$ |
192 |
|
|
$ |
170 |
|
|
|
13 |
% |
|
$ |
(552 |
) |
|
$ |
93 |
|
|
NM |
|
Individual Life |
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
(47 |
%) |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
50 |
|
|
NM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Individual Markets Group |
|
|
208 |
|
|
|
200 |
|
|
|
4 |
% |
|
|
(554 |
) |
|
|
143 |
|
|
NM |
|
Retirement Plans |
|
|
(40 |
) |
|
|
31 |
|
|
NM |
|
|
|
(128 |
) |
|
|
26 |
|
|
NM |
|
Group Benefits |
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
62 |
|
|
|
(77 |
%) |
|
|
83 |
|
|
|
108 |
|
|
|
(23 |
%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Employer Markets Group |
|
|
(26 |
) |
|
|
93 |
|
|
NM |
|
|
|
(45 |
) |
|
|
134 |
|
|
NM |
|
International |
|
|
119 |
|
|
|
72 |
|
|
|
65 |
% |
|
|
(174 |
) |
|
|
80 |
|
|
NM |
|
Institutional |
|
|
(66 |
) |
|
|
(30 |
) |
|
|
(120 |
%) |
|
|
(240 |
) |
|
|
(150 |
) |
|
|
(60 |
%) |
Other |
|
|
(59 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
NM |
|
|
|
(69 |
) |
|
|
(28 |
) |
|
|
(146 |
%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Life |
|
|
176 |
|
|
|
334 |
|
|
|
(47 |
%) |
|
|
(1,082 |
) |
|
|
179 |
|
|
NM |
|
Property & Casualty |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ongoing Operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Underwriting results |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Personal Lines |
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
18 |
|
|
NM |
|
|
|
65 |
|
|
|
123 |
|
|
|
(47 |
%) |
Small Commercial |
|
|
74 |
|
|
|
69 |
|
|
|
7 |
% |
|
|
161 |
|
|
|
188 |
|
|
|
(14 |
%) |
Middle Market |
|
|
56 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
NM |
|
|
|
125 |
|
|
|
58 |
|
|
|
116 |
% |
Specialty Commercial |
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
59 |
|
|
|
57 |
|
|
|
4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ongoing Operations underwriting results |
|
|
156 |
|
|
|
108 |
|
|
|
44 |
% |
|
|
410 |
|
|
|
426 |
|
|
|
(4 |
%) |
Net servicing income [1] |
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
(13 |
%) |
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
114 |
% |
Net investment income |
|
|
239 |
|
|
|
334 |
|
|
|
(28 |
%) |
|
|
424 |
|
|
|
644 |
|
|
|
(34 |
%) |
Net realized
capital losses |
|
|
(80 |
) |
|
|
(53 |
) |
|
|
(51 |
%) |
|
|
(369 |
) |
|
|
(187 |
) |
|
|
(97 |
%) |
Other expenses |
|
|
(48 |
) |
|
|
(65 |
) |
|
|
26 |
% |
|
|
(98 |
) |
|
|
(122 |
) |
|
|
20 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income
before income taxes |
|
|
274 |
|
|
|
332 |
|
|
|
(17 |
%) |
|
|
382 |
|
|
|
768 |
|
|
|
(50 |
%) |
Income tax expense |
|
|
(52 |
) |
|
|
(86 |
) |
|
|
40 |
% |
|
|
(49 |
) |
|
|
(210 |
) |
|
|
77 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ongoing Operations |
|
|
222 |
|
|
|
246 |
|
|
|
(10 |
%) |
|
|
333 |
|
|
|
558 |
|
|
|
(40 |
%) |
Other Operations |
|
|
(49 |
) |
|
|
3 |
|
|
NM |
|
|
|
(48 |
) |
|
|
17 |
|
|
NM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Property & Casualty |
|
|
173 |
|
|
|
249 |
|
|
|
(31 |
%) |
|
|
285 |
|
|
|
575 |
|
|
|
(50 |
%) |
Corporate |
|
|
(364 |
) |
|
|
(40 |
) |
|
NM |
|
|
|
(427 |
) |
|
|
(66 |
) |
|
NM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
(15 |
) |
|
$ |
543 |
|
|
NM |
|
|
$ |
(1,224 |
) |
|
$ |
688 |
|
|
NM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1] |
|
Net of expenses related to service business. |
The Hartford defines NM as not meaningful for increases or decreases greater than 200%, or
changes from a net gain to a net loss position, or vice versa.
Three months ended June 30, 2009 compared to the three months ended June 30, 2008
Net income decreased $558 primarily due to a decrease of $158 from Life and $76 from Property &
Casualty. Also, included in Corporate is approximately $300 in net realized capital losses related
to the settlement of a contingent obligation to Allianz and increased interest expense on debt
issued to Allianz in October 2008. See the Life and Property & Casualty sections of the MD&A for a
discussion on the respective operations performance.
Six months ended June 30, 2009 compared to the six months ended June 30, 2008
Net income decreased $1,912 primarily due to a decrease of $1,261 from Life and $290 from Property
& Casualty. Also, included in Corporate is approximately $300 in net realized capital losses
related to the settlement of a contingent obligation to Allianz and increased interest expense on
debt issued to Allianz in October 2008. See the Life and Property & Casualty sections of the MD&A
for a discussion on the respective operations performance.
Outlook
The Hartford provides projections and other forward-looking information in the Outlook section
within MD&A. The Outlook section contains many forward-looking statements, particularly relating
to the Companys future financial performance. These forward-looking statements are estimates
based on information currently available to the Company, are made pursuant to the safe harbor
provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 and are subject to the
precautionary statements set forth in the introduction to MD&A above. Actual results are likely to
differ, and in the past have differed, materially from those forecast by the Company, depending on
the outcome of various factors, including, but not limited to, those set forth in the Outlook
section, and in
Part I, Item 1A, Risk Factors in The Hartfords 2008 Form 10-K Annual Report, as well as in Part
II, Item 1A, Risk Factors of The Hartfords Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
March 31, 2009 and Part II, Item 1A, Risk Factors in this Form 10-Q.
64
Life
Retail
In the long-term, management continues to believe the market for retirement products will expand as
individuals increasingly save and plan for retirement. Demographic trends suggest that as the
baby boom generation matures, a significant portion of the United States population will allocate
a greater percentage of their disposable incomes to saving for their retirement years due to
uncertainty surrounding the Social Security system and increases in average life expectancy.
Near-term, the industry and the Company are experiencing lower variable annuity sales as a result
of recent market turbulence and concerns over the U.S. financial system, and specifically in the
U.S. Life Insurance industry. Current market pressures are also increasing the expected claim
costs, the cost and volatility of hedging programs, and the level of capital needed to support
living benefit guarantees. Companies have responded by increasing the price of their guaranteed
living benefits and changing the amount of the guarantee offered. Management expects these
de-risking trends to continue for the foreseeable future. In the
first six months of 2009, the Company
adjusted pricing levels and took other actions to de-risk its variable annuity product features in
order to address the risks and costs associated with variable annuity benefit features in the
current economic environment and continues to explore other risk limiting techniques such as
changes to hedging or other reinsurance structures. The Company will continue to evaluate the
benefits offered within its variable annuities and intends to launch a new VA product, and riders,
in the second half of 2009 that will be responsive to customer needs within the risk tolerances of
The Hartford.
Significant declines in equity markets and increased equity market volatility are also likely to
continue to impact the cost and effectiveness of our GMWB hedging program. Continued equity market
volatility could result in material losses in our hedging program. For more information on the
GMWB hedging program, see the Equity Risk Management section within Capital Markets Risk
Management.
During this period of volatile equity markets, the Company experienced an increase in fixed annuity
sales. This trend reversed in the second quarter 2009 as lower interest rates and the transition to
a new product lowered fixed annuity sales. Management expects fixed annuity sales to continue to be
challenged until interest rates increase. In the second quarter of 2009, the Company has continued
its policy of offering higher crediting rates available to renewals of its market-value adjusted
fixed annuity business. This higher crediting rate strategy for MVA renewals is expected to
continue for some time, which will strain earnings on this renewal business.
For the retail mutual fund business, net sales can vary significantly depending on market
conditions, as was experienced in the first six months of 2009. The continued declines in equity
markets in the first quarter of 2009 helped drive continued declines in the Companys mutual fund
deposits and assets under management. During the second quarter, the equity markets improved from
the first quarter and as a result the Company mutual fund assets under management and deposits
increased by 21% and 37%, respectively, compared to the first quarter of 2009. As this business
continues to evolve, success will be driven by diversifying net sales across the mutual fund
platform, delivering superior investment performance and creating new investment solutions for
current and future mutual fund shareholders.
The decline in assets under management as compared to 2008 is the result of continued depressed values of the equity
markets in 2009 as compared to 2008 which has decreased the extent of the scale efficiencies that Retail has benefited
from in recent years. The significant reduction in assets under management has resulted in revenues declining faster
than expenses causing lower earnings during the first half of 2009 and management expects this strain to continue
throughout the year. Individual Annuity net investment spread has been impacted by losses on limited partnership and
other alternative investments, lower yields on fixed maturities and an increase in crediting rates on renewals for
market value adjusted annuities. Management expects these spread conditions to persist in the second half of 2009.
Management will continue to actively evaluate its expense structure to ensure the business is controlling costs while
maintaining an appropriate level of service to our customers.
Individual Life
Future sales for all products will be influenced by the Companys ratings, as published by the
various ratings agencies, and active management of current distribution relationships, responding
to the impact of recent merger and consolidation activity on existing distribution relationships
and the development of new sources of distribution, while offering competitive and innovative
products and product features. The current economic environment poses challenges for future sales;
while life insurance products respond well to consumer demand for financial security and wealth
accumulation solutions, individuals may be reluctant to transfer funds when market volatility has
recently resulted in significant declines in investment values. In addition, the availability and
terms of capital solutions in the marketplace, as discussed below, to support universal life
products with secondary guarantees, may reduce future growth in these products.
Sales and account values for variable universal life products have been under pressure due to
continued equity market volatility and declines. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2009,
variable universal life sales decreased 61% and 67%, respectively, and account values decreased 24%
compared to prior year. Continued volatility and declines in the equity markets may reduce the
attractiveness of variable universal life products and put additional strain on future earnings as
variable life fees earned by the Company
are driven by the level of assets under management. The variable universal life mix was 39% of
total life insurance in-force as of June 30, 2009.
65
Individual Life reinsured the policy liability related to statutory reserves in universal life with
secondary guarantees to a captive reinsurance subsidiary. These reserves are calculated under
prevailing statutory reserving requirements as promulgated under Actuarial Guideline 38, The
Application of the Valuation of Life Insurance Policies Model Regulation. An unaffiliated standby
third party letter of credit supports a portion of the statutory reserves that have been ceded to
this subsidiary. Beginning in 2007, the use of the letter of credit resulted in a decline in net
investment income and increased expenses in future periods for Individual Life. As of June 30,
2009, the transaction provided approximately $540 of statutory capital relief associated with the
Companys universal life products with secondary guarantees. At the current level of sales, the
Company expects this transaction to accommodate future statutory capital needs for in-force
business and new business written through 2009 and into 2010. Under the terms of the letter of
credit, the issuer has the right to require The Hartford to terminate the reinsurance agreement
with the captive reinsurance subsidiary, as it applies to new business, at any time after September
30, 2009. Management has not received any indication that the issuer intends to exercise this
right. As the marketplace and its business evolves in this product line, Individual Life will
evaluate the availability of and need for an additional capital transaction.
For risk management purposes, Individual Life accepts and retains up to $10 in risk on any one
life. Individual Life uses reinsurance where appropriate to protect against the severity of losses
on individual claims; however, death claim experience may continue to lead to periodic short-term
earnings volatility. In the second quarter of 2009, Individual Life began ceding insurance under a
new reinsurance structure for all new business excluding term life insurance. The new reinsurance
structure allows Individual Life greater flexibility in writing larger policies, while retaining
less of the overall risk associated with individual insured lives. This new reinsurance structure
will help balance the overall profitability of Individual Lifes business. The financial results
of the new structure will be recognized over time as new business subject to the structure grows as
a percentage of Individual Lifes total in-force. As a result of the new reinsurance structure,
Individual Life will recognize increasing reinsurance premiums while minimizing earnings volatility
associated with mortality experience.
Individual Life continues to face uncertainty surrounding estate tax legislation, aggressive
competition from other life insurance providers, reduced availability and higher price of
reinsurance, and the current regulatory environment related to reserving for term life insurance
and universal life products with no-lapse guarantees. These risks may have a negative impact on
Individual Lifes future earnings.
Retirement Plans
The future financial results of the Retirement Plans segment will depend on Lifes ability to
increase assets under management across all businesses, achieve scale in areas with a high degree
of fixed costs and maintain its investment spread earnings on the general account products sold
largely in the 403(b)/457 business. Disciplined expense management will continue to be a focus of
the Retirement Plan segment as necessary investments in service and technology are made to effect
the integration of the acquisitions described below.
During 2008, the Company completed three Retirement Plans acquisitions. The acquisition of part of
the defined contribution record keeping business of Princeton Retirement Group gives Life a
foothold in the business of providing recordkeeping services to large financial firms which offer
defined contribution plans to their clients and at acquisition added $2.9 billion in mutual funds
to Retirement Plans assets under management and $5.7 billion of assets under administration. The
acquisition of Sun Life Retirement Services, Inc., at acquisition added $15.8 billion in Retirement
Plans assets under management across 6,000 plans and provides new service locations in Boston,
Massachusetts and Phoenix, Arizona. The acquisition of TopNoggin LLC., provides web-based
technology to address data management, administration and benefit calculations. These three
acquisitions were not accretive to 2008 net income. Furthermore, net income as a percentage of
assets is expected to be lower in 2009 reflecting a full year of the new business mix represented
by the acquisitions, which includes larger, more institutionally priced plans, predominantly
executed on a mutual fund platform, and the cost of maintaining multiple technology platforms
during the integration period.
Given the recent market declines in the fourth quarter of 2008 and first quarter of 2009 and
increased market volatility, the Company has seen and expects that growth in Retirement deposits
will be negatively affected if businesses reduce their workforces and offer more modest salary
increases and as workers potentially allocate less to retirement accounts in the near term. The
severe decline in equity markets in the second half of 2008 and through the first quarter of 2009
has significantly reduced Retirement Plans assets under management, which has strained its net
income. This earnings strain is expected to continue throughout 2009 or until the equity markets
improve.
Group Benefits
Group Benefits sales may fluctuate based on the competitive pricing environment in the
marketplace. The Company anticipates relatively stable loss ratios and expense ratios over the
long-term based on underlying trends in the in-force business and disciplined new business and
renewal underwriting. The Company has not seen a meaningful impact in its disability loss ratios
as a result of the recent economic downturn. While claims incidence may increase during a
recession, the Company would expect the impact to the disability loss ratio to be within the normal
range of volatility.
The current economic downturn, which has resulted in rising unemployment, combined with the
potential for employees to lessen spending on the Companys products, has begun to impact premium
levels and may impact future premium growth. Over time, as
employers design benefit strategies to attract and retain employees, while attempting to control
their benefit costs, management believes that the need for the Companys products will continue to
expand. This combined with the significant number of employees who currently do not have coverage
or adequate levels of coverage, creates opportunities for our products and services.
66
International
Profitability depends on the account values of our customers, which are affected by equity, bond
and currency markets. Periods of favorable market performance will increase assets under
management and thus increase fee income earned on those assets, while unfavorable market
performance will have the reverse effect. In addition, higher or lower account value levels will
generally reduce or increase, respectively, certain costs for individual annuities to the Company,
such as guaranteed minimum death benefits (GMDB), guaranteed minimum income benefits (GMIB),
guaranteed minimum accumulation benefits (GMAB) and GMWB. Prudent expense management is also an important component of product profitability.
During 2009 International has experienced significant market declines during the first quarter of
2009 resulting in higher claim costs for its product guarantees. Declining account values and
rising benefit costs are pressuring margins. In addition, surrender fees have declined due to
lower than expected surrenders. During the second quarter of 2009, the Company suspended all new
sales in Internationals Japan and European operations. International is currently in the process
of restructuring its operations to maximize profitability and capital efficiency while continuing
to focus on risk management and maintaining appropriate service levels.
Institutional
The Company is evaluating strategic options with respect to Institutional businesses. Sales for
ratings-sensitive products such as stable value and payout annuities have declined to minimal
levels. The net income of this segment depends on Institutionals ability to retain assets under
management, the relative mix of business, and net investment spread. Net investment spread, as
discussed in the Performance Measures section of this MD&A, has declined in the second quarter of
2009 versus prior year amounts and management expects net investment spread will remain pressured
throughout the remainder of 2009 due to the anticipated performance of limited partnerships and
other alternative investments as well as the decline in short-term interest rates.
Stable value products will experience negative net flows in 2009 as a result of contractual
maturities and the payments associated with certain contracts which allow an investor to accelerate
principal repayments (after a defined notice period of typically thirteen months). Approximately
$2.3 billion of account value will be paid out on stable value contracts during the remainder of
2009. Institutional will fund these obligations from cash and short-term investments presently
held in its investment portfolios along with projected receipts of earned interest and principal
maturities from long-term invested assets. As of June 30, 2009, Institutional has no remaining
contracts that contain an unexercised investor option feature that allows for contract surrender at
book value. The Company has the option to accelerate the repayment of principal for certain other
stable value products and will evaluate calling these contracts on a contract by contract basis
based upon the financial impact to the Company.
Property & Casualty
Ongoing Operations
In 2009, management expects Ongoing Operations written premium to be lower, reflecting the effects
of the downturn in the economy, the adverse impact of recent ratings downgrades on certain segments
of the portfolio, and a continuation of competitive market conditions. The effects of the downturn
in the economy are manifested in declining new car and home sales, lower rates of small business
formations, higher rates of small business failures, and declining payrolls. A continuation of
these negative economic trends will adversely affect new business growth rates, increase mid-term
cancellations, and exacerbate declining levels of coverage and average written premium across all
lines of business. Written premium declines may be greater than expected if the economy
deteriorates further or if the market perceives greater uncertainty about the financial strength of
the Company.
Excluding catastrophes and prior accident year development, Ongoing Operations underwriting margins
will likely decline in 2009 due primarily to increases in both the loss and loss adjustment expense
ratio as well as the expense ratio, partially offset by lower anticipated policyholder dividends.
The Ongoing Operations 2009 accident year loss and loss adjustment expense ratio before
catastrophes is expected to increase due to mid single-digit increases in claim cost severity and
continued earned pricing decreases for Middle Market and large commercial lines, partially offset
by favorable claim frequency in Small Commercial and Middle Market.
The Ongoing Operations expense ratio is expected to increase in 2009, in part, due to lower
expected earned premium in Small Commercial, Middle Market and Specialty Commercial, the
amortization of a higher amount of acquisition costs on AARP and other business and an increase in
the cost of investments in technology to support future growth. The policyholder dividend ratio
was unusually high in 2008 due to the accrual of $26 in dividends due to certain workers
compensation policyholders as a result of underwriting profits. See the Property and Casualty MD&A
section for further discussion.
Current accident year catastrophe losses in 2008, at 5.3% of Ongoing Operations earned premium,
were higher than the long-term historical average due principally to hurricane Ike and higher than
average losses from tornadoes and thunderstorms in the South and Midwest. While catastrophe losses
vary significantly from year to year and are unpredictable, management has assumed that catastrophe
losses in 2009 will be closer to 3% to 3.5% of earned premium. The Company will continue to manage
its exposure to
catastrophe losses through the ongoing assessment of its risk, disciplined underwriting and the use
of reinsurance and other risk transfer alternatives, as appropriate. As of January 1, 2009, the
Companys retention under its principal property catastrophe reinsurance program remained at $250
per catastrophe event. With the January 1 and July 1, 2009 renewals, the cost of the Companys
principal property catastrophe reinsurance program has increased modestly.
67
Driven primarily by an expected increase in loss costs and underwriting expenses, the Company
expects the Ongoing Operations combined ratio before catastrophes and prior accident year
development in 2009 to be higher than the 88.9 achieved in 2008.
Personal Lines
Within the Personal Lines segment, the Company expects written premium to be relatively flat in
2009, with growth in AARP largely offset by a decline in Agency. The Company expects personal auto
written premium to be slightly higher and homeowners written premium to be slightly lower. The
expected increase in AARP written premium will be largely driven by continued direct marketing to
AARP members, the continued enhancement of the Next Gen Auto product and the effect of
cross-selling homeowners insurance to insureds who have auto policies. The expected decline in
Agency written premium will be driven, in part, by the Companys decision to stop renewing Florida
homeowners policies sold through agents.
In 2009, the Company expects to increase its auto and homeowners written premium generated from
agents selling the AARP product and from direct sales to the consumer. The Company has launched a
brand and channel expansion pilot in four states: Arizona, Illinois, Tennessee and Minnesota. In
the targeted states, the Company has increased Personal Lines brand advertising, launched direct
marketing efforts beyond its existing AARP program and begun selling the AARP product through
agents. The Company plans to expand the sale of the AARP product through agents to additional
states by the end of 2009. In addition, in July, 2009, the Company extended its agreement to
operate a member contact center for health insurance products offered through the AARP Health
program. The agreement was extended through 2018.
While carriers in the personal lines industry will continue to compete on price, management expects
that written pricing in Personal Lines will continue to increase modestly in 2009 in response to
rising loss costs. For both auto and homeowners, written pricing increased in 2008 and the first
six months of 2009. While the Companys written pricing is increasing, largely offsetting this has
been the effect of a shift of business to more preferred market segments (which has a lower average
premium) and actions taken by consumers to lower their premium, such as raising deductibles,
reducing limits, dropping coverage and reducing mileage. In addition, the Company has seen an
increase in consumer shopping driven by higher rates (instituted over the past year) and
recessionary conditions.
The combined ratio before catastrophes and prior accident year development for Personal Lines is
expected to be higher in 2009 than the 87.6 achieved in 2008 due to an expected increase in both
the current accident year loss and loss adjustment expense ratio and the expense ratio. For auto
business, emerged claim frequency in 2008 was favorable to the prior year and claim severity was
slightly higher. In 2009, management expects claim severity will increase and claim frequency will
flatten. Non-catastrophe loss costs of homeowners claims increased in 2008 due to higher claim
frequency and severity and management expects frequency and severity to continue to rise in 2009.
The expense ratio is expected to be higher in 2009 driven by higher amortization of AARP
acquisition costs and costs incurred on the direct-to-consumer pilot while earned premium is
expected to remain relatively flat.
Small Commercial
Within Small Commercial, management expects written premium in 2009 will be lower, driven by a
decrease in new business growth and lower premium renewal retention in all lines. In the first six
months of 2009, Small Commercials written premium decreased by 6% driven, in part, by the effects
of the economic downturn as the Company has seen an increase in cancellations, lower earned audit
premium, a reduction in endorsement activity and lower payrolls that has resulted in declining
average renewal premium. Small Commercial has introduced several initiatives aimed at improving
premium renewal retention including cross-sell programs, as well as other product offerings
designed to help customers weather the current economic crisis. Written premium decreases for
workers compensation business are expected to be more modest than for package business or
commercial auto as management seeks to expand its underwriting appetite in selected industries and
expand business written through payroll service providers. In 2009, average premium per policy in
Small Commercial is expected to continue to decline due to written pricing decreases, a lower
average premium on commercial auto business and the effect of declining mid-term endorsements.
Written pricing in Small Commercial decreased by 2% in 2008.
The combined ratio before catastrophes and prior accident year development for Small Commercial is
expected to be higher in 2009 than the 82.8 achieved in 2008 due to an expected increase in the
current accident year loss and loss adjustment expense ratio and the expense ratio, partially
offset by a decrease in the policyholder dividend ratio. The increase in the expense ratio will
largely be driven by the decrease in earned premiums. Small Commercial experienced favorable
frequency on workers compensation claims in recent accident years and management expects favorable
frequency to continue for the 2009 accident year though not as favorable in the second half of 2009
as it was in the first half of the year. While the Company experienced favorable non-catastrophe
property losses on package business and commercial auto claims in 2008, management expects severity
will continue its long-term increasing trend for non-catastrophe property claims in the second half
of 2009, and frequency will be less favorable.
68
Middle Market
Management expects that 2009 written premium for Middle Market will be lower due to a decrease in
premium renewal retention that is primarily driven by a downturn in the economy that is impacting
construction lines in marine and payroll exposures for workers compensation. Written premium in
Middle Market decreased by 8% in the first six months of 2009 driven by the downturn in the
economy, which is partially reflected in lower earned audit premium. Additionally, the Company
continued to take a disciplined approach to evaluating and pricing risks in the face of declines in
written pricing. Written pricing for Middle Market business declined by 5% in 2008 and declined by
2% over the first six months of 2009. While management expects written pricing to continue to
stabilize through the remainder of 2009, management expects carriers will continue to price new
business more aggressively than renewals. Management will seek to compete for new business and
protect renewals in Middle Market by, among other actions, refining its pricing models, increasing
its willingness to write more workers compensation business on a mono-line basis and writing
larger property policies and umbrella general liability policies. In the first two months of the
second quarter of 2009, the Companys new business and premium renewal retention were negatively
affected by uncertainty in the marketplace regarding The Hartford, but premium retention and new
business improved significantly in the month of June for both smaller and larger accounts after the
Company reaffirmed its focus on its core domestic Property & Casualty and Life businesses and its
ratings stabilized.
Carriers in the commercial lines market segment reported some moderation in the rate of price
declines during the fourth quarter of 2008 and first six months of 2009. Like in the Personal
Lines and Small Commercial market segments, current economic conditions (lower payrolls, declines
in production, lower sales, etc.) are reducing written premium growth opportunities.
The combined ratio before catastrophes and prior accident year development for Middle Market is
expected to be higher in 2009 than the 93.4 achieved in 2008 due to an expected increase in the
current accident year loss and loss adjustment expense ratio and the expense ratio, partially
offset by a decrease in the policyholder dividend ratio. Claim cost severity has been favorable on
property and marine claims for the first six months of 2009 as the Company experienced a number of
individually large property losses in 2008. However, management expects that claim cost severity
for property and marine claims will not be as favorable for the remainder of 2009 and that severity
will continue to increase for all other lines within Middle Market. The Company also expects a
continuation of moderately lower frequency in 2009.
Specialty Commercial
Within Specialty Commercial, management expects written premium to be significantly lower,
primarily driven by the sale of the Companys core excess and surplus lines property businesses and
a decrease in professional liability, fidelity and surety written premium, particularly for public
company directors and officers insurance and errors and omissions insurance. Although certain of
the Companys ratings stabilized in May of 2009, concerns about the Companys financial strength
had a negative effect on commercial directors and officers and contract surety lines of business
for the first six months of 2009. As a substantial portion of the Companys professional
liability, fidelity and surety portfolio is sensitive to ratings changes, further adverse changes
of the Companys ratings or market perception of our financial strength could further deteriorate
Specialty Commercials written premium for 2009. In addition, the departure of a number of staff
at Hartford Financial Products during the month of June 2009 could adversely affect written premium
growth in the short-term, particularly for commercial directors and officers accounts. Specialty
Commercial written premium declined by 14% in the first six months of 2009.
For professional liability business within Specialty Commercial, the Company expects its losses
from the fallout of the sub-prime mortgage market and the broader credit crisis to be manageable
based on several factors. Principal among them is the diversified nature of the Companys product
and customer portfolio, with a majority of the Companys total in-force professional liability net
written premium derived from policyholders with privately-held ownership and, therefore, relatively
low shareholder class action exposure. Reinsurance substantially mitigates the net limits exposed
per policy and no single industry segment comprises 15% or more of the Companys professional
liability book of business by net written premium. About half of the Companys limits exposed to
federal shareholder class action claims filed in 2008 and the first six months of 2009 are under
Side-A D&O insurance policies that provide protection to individual directors and officers only in
cases where their company cannot indemnify them. In addition, 95% of the exposed limits are on
excess policies rather than primary policies. Regarding the Madoff and Stanford alleged fraud
cases which continue to evolve, based on a detailed ground-up review of all claims notices received
to date and an analysis of potentially involved parties noted in press reports, the Company
anticipates only a limited number of its policies and corresponding net limits to be exposed. The
Company expects its losses from the sub-prime mortgage and credit crisis, as well as its exposure
to the Madoff and Stanford cases, to be within its expected loss estimates.
In 2009, the combined ratio before catastrophes and prior accident year development for Specialty
Commercial is expected to be higher than the 97.3 achieved in 2008 due to an expected increase in
both the current accident year loss and loss adjustment expense ratio and the expense ratio,
partially offset by a decrease in the policyholder dividend ratio. A higher loss and loss
adjustment expense ratio for professional liability claims is expected in 2009, driven by an
expectation of earned pricing decreases.
69
Other Operations
The Other Operations segment will continue to manage the discontinued property and casualty
operations of the Company, as well as claims (and associated reserves) related to asbestos,
environmental and other exposures. The Company will continue to review various components of all
of its reserves on a regular basis. The Company expects to perform its regular review of
environmental liabilities in the third quarter of 2009. If there are significant developments that
affect particular exposures, reinsurance arrangements or the financial condition of particular
reinsurers, the Company will make adjustments to its reserves, or the portion of liabilities it
expects to cede to reinsurers.
Investment Income
Property & Casualty operating cash flow is expected to be less favorable in 2009 than in 2008,
although still positive. Based upon expected losses from limited partnerships and other
alternative investments and an increased allocation of investments to lower-yielding U.S.
Treasuries and short-term instruments, Property & Casualty expects a lower investment portfolio
yield for 2009.
70
LIFE
Executive Overview
Life is organized into four groups which are comprised of six reporting segments: The Retail
Products Group (Retail) and Individual Life segments make up the Individual Markets Groups. The
Retirement Plans and Group Benefits segments make up the Employer Markets Group. The Institutional
Solutions Group (Institutional) and International segments each make up their own group. Life
provides investment and retirement products, such as variable and fixed annuities, mutual funds and
retirement plan services and other institutional investment products, such as structured
settlements; individual and private-placement life insurance and products including variable
universal life, universal life, interest sensitive whole life and term life; and group benefit
products, such as group life and group disability insurance.
The following provides a summary of the significant factors used by management to assess the
performance of the business. For a complete discussion of these factors, see MD&A in The
Hartfords 2008 Form 10-K Annual Report.
Performance Measures
DAC amortization ratio, return on assets (ROA) or after-tax margin, excluding realized gains
(losses) or DAC unlock are non-GAAP financial measures that the Company uses to evaluate, and
believes are important measures of, segment operating performance. DAC amortization ratio, ROA or
after-tax margin is the most directly comparable U.S. GAAP measure. The Hartford believes that the
measures of DAC amortization ratio, ROA or after-tax margin, excluding realized gains (losses) and
DAC unlock provide investors with a valuable measure of the performance of the Companys on-going
businesses because it reveals trends in our businesses that may be obscured by the effect of
realized gains (losses) or periodic DAC unlocks. Some realized capital gains and losses are
primarily driven by investment decisions and external economic developments, the nature and timing
of which are unrelated to insurance aspects of our businesses. Accordingly, these non-GAAP
measures exclude the effect of all realized gains and losses that tend to be highly variable from
period to period based on capital market conditions. The Hartford believes, however, that some
realized capital gains and losses are integrally related to our insurance operations, so DAC
amortization ratio, ROA and after-tax margin, excluding the realized gains (losses) and DAC unlock
should include net realized gains and losses on net periodic settlements on the Japan fixed annuity
cross-currency swap. These net realized gains and losses are directly related to an offsetting
item included in the statement of operations such as net investment income. DAC unlocks occur when
the Company determines that estimates of future gross profits should be revised in accordance with
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 97. As the DAC unlock is a reflection of the
Companys new best estimates of future gross profits, the result and its impact on DAC amortization
ratio, ROA and after-tax margin is meaningful; however, it does distort the trend of DAC
amortization ratio, ROA and after-tax margin. DAC amortization ratio, ROA or after-tax margin,
excluding realized gains (losses) and DAC unlock should not be considered as a substitute for DAC
amortization ratio, ROA or after-tax margin and does not reflect the overall profitability of our
businesses. Therefore, the Company believes it is important for investors to evaluate both DAC
amortization ratio, ROA and after-tax margin, excluding realized gains (losses) and DAC unlock and
DAC amortization ratio, ROA and after-tax margin when reviewing the Companys performance.
71
Fee Income
Fee income is largely driven from amounts collected as a result of contractually defined
percentages of assets under management. These fees are generally collected on a daily basis. For
individual life insurance products, fees are contractually defined as percentages based on levels
of insurance, age, premiums and deposits collected and contract holder value. Life insurance fees
are generally collected on a monthly basis. Therefore, the growth in assets under management
either through positive net flows or net sales, or favorable equity market performance will have a
favorable impact on fee income. Conversely, either negative net flows or net sales, or unfavorable
equity market performance will reduce fee income.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of and For the |
|
|
As of and For the |
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
Product/Key Indicator Information |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Retail U.S. Individual Variable Annuities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Account value, beginning of period |
|
$ |
68,166 |
|
|
$ |
107,920 |
|
|
$ |
74,578 |
|
|
$ |
119,071 |
|
Net flows |
|
|
(1,596 |
) |
|
|
(1,578 |
) |
|
|
(3,560 |
) |
|
|
(2,817 |
) |
Change in market value and other |
|
|
9,043 |
|
|
|
(997 |
) |
|
|
4,595 |
|
|
|
(10,909 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Account value, end of period |
|
$ |
75,613 |
|
|
|
105,345 |
|
|
$ |
75,613 |
|
|
|
105,345 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retail Mutual Funds |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets under management, beginning of period |
|
$ |
28,706 |
|
|
$ |
44,617 |
|
|
$ |
31,032 |
|
|
$ |
48,383 |
|
Net sales |
|
|
1,127 |
|
|
|
1,901 |
|
|
|
627 |
|
|
|
3,022 |
|
Change in market value and other |
|
|
4,875 |
|
|
|
721 |
|
|
|
3,049 |
|
|
|
(4,166 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets under management, end of period |
|
$ |
34,708 |
|
|
$ |
47,239 |
|
|
$ |
34,708 |
|
|
$ |
47,239 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Individual Life Insurance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Variable universal life account value, end of period |
|
$ |
5,049 |
|
|
$ |
6,625 |
|
|
$ |
5,049 |
|
|
$ |
6,625 |
|
Universal life/interest sensitive whole life insurance in-force |
|
|
53,213 |
|
|
|
50,298 |
|
|
|
53,213 |
|
|
|
50,298 |
|
Variable universal life insurance in-force |
|
$ |
76,946 |
|
|
$ |
78,557 |
|
|
$ |
76,946 |
|
|
$ |
78,557 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retirement Plans Group Annuities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Account value, beginning of period |
|
$ |
21,852 |
|
|
$ |
26,339 |
|
|
$ |
22,198 |
|
|
$ |
27,094 |
|
Net flows |
|
|
(585 |
) |
|
|
611 |
|
|
|
46 |
|
|
|
1,511 |
|
Change in market value and other |
|
|
2,223 |
|
|
|
79 |
|
|
|
1,246 |
|
|
|
(1,576 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Account value, end of period |
|
$ |
23,490 |
|
|
$ |
27,029 |
|
|
$ |
23,490 |
|
|
$ |
27,029 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retirement Plans Mutual Funds |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets under management, beginning of period |
|
$ |
14,144 |
|
|
$ |
20,071 |
|
|
$ |
14,838 |
|
|
$ |
1,454 |
|
Net sales |
|
|
(697 |
) |
|
|
(230 |
) |
|
|
(640 |
) |
|
|
(108 |
) |
Acquisitions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,725 |
|
Change in market value and other |
|
|
1,895 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
1,144 |
|
|
|
(217 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets under management, end of period |
|
$ |
15,342 |
|
|
$ |
19,854 |
|
|
$ |
15,342 |
|
|
$ |
19,854 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Japan Annuities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Account value, beginning of period |
|
$ |
30,946 |
|
|
$ |
38,975 |
|
|
$ |
34,495 |
|
|
$ |
37,637 |
|
Net flows |
|
|
(228 |
) |
|
|
597 |
|
|
|
(357 |
) |
|
|
1,260 |
|
Change in market value and other |
|
|
2,230 |
|
|
|
997 |
|
|
|
1,508 |
|
|
|
(2,742 |
) |
Effect of currency translation |
|
|
761 |
|
|
|
(2,447 |
) |
|
|
(1,937 |
) |
|
|
1,967 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Account value, end of period |
|
$ |
33,709 |
|
|
$ |
38,122 |
|
|
$ |
33,709 |
|
|
$ |
38,122 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
S&P 500 Index |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period end closing value |
|
|
919 |
|
|
|
1,280 |
|
|
|
919 |
|
|
|
1,280 |
|
Daily average value |
|
|
893 |
|
|
|
1,371 |
|
|
|
851 |
|
|
|
1,361 |
|
Assets under management, across all businesses, shown above, have had substantial reductions in
values from prior year primarily due to declines in equity markets during 2008 and the first
quarter of 2009. The changes in line of business assets under management have also been affected
by:
|
|
Retails U.S. individual variable annuity business recorded lower deposits for the three
and six months ended June 30, 2009 as a result of sharp equity market declines over the last
twelve months. |
|
|
Retail Mutual funds have seen a decline in net sales for the three and six months ended
June 30, 2009 as a result of lower deposits driven by equity market declines and volatility. |
72
|
|
Individual Life has increased its universal life/interest sensitive whole life insurance
in-force by approximately 6% primarily as a result of continued strong sales of secondary
guaranteed universal life insurance products. Individual life has experienced significant
decreases in variable life insurance account values as a result of the declines in equity
markets, while variable universal life in-force has declined slightly as a result of lower sales
during the first three and six months of 2009, and aging of the variable universal life
insurance block of business resulting in increasing mortality and surrender experience. |
|
|
For the three months ended June 30, 2009, Retirement Plans has seen declines in net flows
and net sales in group annuities and mutual funds due largely to a few large case surrenders. |
|
|
International For the three months ended June 30, 2009, Japan annuities have seen
favorable effects from currency exchange rates. For the six months ended June 30, 2009, Japan
annuities have seen an unfavorable impact from currency exchange rates. Net flows have
decreased in Japan annuities due to increased competition from domestic and foreign insurers.
In addition, Japans deposits have slowed significantly due to increased competition and the
suspension of new sales in the second quarter of 2009. |
Net Investment Spread
Management evaluates performance of certain products based on net investment spread. These
products include those that have insignificant mortality risk, such as fixed annuities, certain
general account universal life contracts and certain institutional contracts. Net investment
spread is determined by taking the difference between the earned rate, (excluding the effects of
realized capital gains and losses, including those related to the Companys GMWB product and
related reinsurance and hedging programs), and the related crediting rates on average general
account assets under management. The net investment spreads shown below are for the total
portfolio of relevant contracts in each segment and reflect business written at different times.
When pricing products, the Company considers current investment yields and not the portfolio
average. Net investment spread can be volatile period over period, which can have a significant
positive or negative effect on the operating results of each segment. Investment earnings can also
be influenced by factors such as the actions of the Federal Reserve and a decision to hold higher
levels of short-term investments. The volatile nature of net investment spread is driven primarily
by prepayment premiums on securities and earnings on limited partnership and other alternative
investments.
Net investment spread is calculated as a percentage of general account assets and expressed in
basis points (bps):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Retail Individual Annuity |
|
21.7 |
bps |
|
138.5 |
bps |
|
2.4 |
bps |
|
133.3 |
bps |
Individual Life |
|
88.4 |
bps |
|
137.4 |
bps |
|
76.6 |
bps |
|
131.5 |
bps |
Retirement Plans |
|
59.2 |
bps |
|
141.6 |
bps |
|
53.1 |
bps |
|
138.4 |
bps |
Institutional (GICs,
Funding Agreements,
Funding Agreement Backed
Notes and Consumer Notes) |
|
(31.0 |
) bps |
|
85.1 |
bps |
|
(54.3 |
) bps |
|
84.5 |
bps |
|
|
Individual Annuity, Individual Life, Retirement Plans and Institutional net investment
spread decreased primarily due to significant losses on limited partnership and other
alternative investments during the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 compared to
earnings in these classes in the comparable 2008 periods and lower yields on fixed maturities,
partially offset by reduced credited rates for Individual Life, Retirement Plans and
Institutional. Crediting rates for renewals on Retail Individual Annuitys market value
adjusted annuities have increased, which has added to the decrease in Retails net investment
spread. In addition, lower market interest rates and higher balances in cash and short-term
investments have pressured spread levels. The Company expects these conditions to persist
throughout 2009. |
73
Premiums
Traditional insurance type products, such as those sold by Group Benefits, collect premiums from
policyholders in exchange for financial protection for the policyholder from a specified insurable
loss, such as death or disability. These premiums together with net investment income earned from
the overall investment strategy are used to pay the contractual obligations under these insurance
contracts. Two major factors, new sales and persistency, impact premium growth. Sales can
increase or decrease in a given year based on a number of factors, including but not limited to,
customer demand for the Companys product offerings, pricing competition, distribution channels and
the Companys reputation and ratings. Persistency refers to the percentage of premium remaining
in-force from year-to-year.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
Group Benefits |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Total premiums and other considerations |
|
$ |
1,074 |
|
|
$ |
1,100 |
|
|
$ |
2,212 |
|
|
$ |
2,174 |
|
Fully insured ongoing sales (excluding buyouts) |
|
$ |
89 |
|
|
$ |
135 |
|
|
$ |
489 |
|
|
$ |
516 |
|
|
|
The decrease in premiums and other considerations, excluding buyouts, for the three months
ended June 30, 2009 was due primarily to reductions in the covered lives within our customer
base, slightly higher cancellations and higher ceded premiums for certain reinsurance
contracts. |
Expenses
There are three major categories for expenses. The first major category of expenses is benefits
and losses. These include the costs of mortality and morbidity, particularly in the group benefits
business, and mortality in the individual life businesses, as well as other contractholder benefits
to policyholders. In addition, traditional insurance type products generally use a loss ratio
which is expressed as the amount of benefits incurred during a particular period divided by total
premiums and other considerations, as a key indicator of underwriting performance. Since Group
Benefits occasionally buys a block of claims for a stated premium amount, the Company excludes this
buyout from the loss ratio used for evaluating the underwriting results of the business as buyouts
may distort the loss ratio.
The second major category is insurance operating costs and expenses, which is commonly expressed in
a ratio of a revenue measure depending on the type of business. The third major category is the
amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs and the present value of future profits (DAC
amortization ratio), which is typically expressed as a percentage of pre-tax income before the cost
of this amortization (an approximation of actual gross profits) and excludes the effects of
realized capital gains and losses. Retail individual annuity business accounts for the majority of
the amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs and present value of future profits for Life.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Retail |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General insurance expense ratio (individual annuity) |
|
23.4 |
bps |
|
21.2 |
bps |
|
22.6 |
bps |
|
18.6 |
bps |
DAC amortization ratio (individual annuity) |
|
|
14.0 |
% |
|
|
47.4 |
% |
|
|
363.3 |
% |
|
|
47.8 |
% |
DAC amortization ratio (individual annuity)
excluding DAC Unlock [1], [2] |
|
|
71.0 |
% |
|
|
42.7 |
% |
|
|
68.0 |
% |
|
|
43.3 |
% |
|
Individual Life |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Death benefits |
|
$ |
78 |
|
|
$ |
88 |
|
|
$ |
172 |
|
|
$ |
179 |
|
|
Group Benefits |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total benefits, losses and loss adjustment expenses |
|
$ |
822 |
|
|
$ |
811 |
|
|
$ |
1,682 |
|
|
$ |
1,599 |
|
Loss ratio (excluding buyout premiums) |
|
|
76.5 |
% |
|
|
73.7 |
% |
|
|
76.0 |
% |
|
|
73.6 |
% |
Expense ratio (excluding buyout premiums) |
|
|
28.1 |
% |
|
|
25.8 |
% |
|
|
26.2 |
% |
|
|
26.8 |
% |
|
International Japan |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General insurance expense ratio |
|
45.8 |
bps |
|
47.7 |
bps |
|
44.6 |
bps |
|
45.4 |
bps |
DAC amortization ratio |
|
|
(11.8 |
%) |
|
|
37.2 |
% |
|
|
736.4 |
% |
|
|
46.4 |
% |
DAC amortization ratio excluding DAC Unlock [2],
[3], [4] |
|
|
44.2 |
% |
|
|
39.3 |
% |
|
|
48.1 |
% |
|
|
39.2 |
% |
|
Institutional |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General insurance expense ratio |
|
|
10.7 |
|
|
|
16.1 |
|
|
|
10.7 |
|
|
|
14.5 |
|
|
|
|
[1] |
|
Excludes the effects of realized gains and losses. |
|
[2] |
|
See Unlock and Sensitivity Analysis in the Critical Accounting Estimates section of the MD&A. |
|
[3] |
|
Excludes the effects of realized gains and losses except for net periodic settlements. Included in the net
realized capital gain (losses) are amounts that represent the net periodic accruals on currency rate swaps used in
the risk management of Japan fixed annuity products. |
|
[4] |
|
Excludes the effects of 3 Wins related charge of $62, pre-tax, on net income. |
74
|
|
The Retail general insurance expense ratio increased primarily due to the impact of a sharply declining asset base
on slightly lower expenses. |
|
|
|
The Retail DAC amortization ratio (Individual Annuity) excluding realized gains (losses) and the effect of the DAC
Unlock increased as a result of lower actual gross profits primarily due to equity market declines and lower
returns on investments in limited partnerships and other alternative investments. |
|
|
|
Individual Life death benefits decreased due to favorable mortality volatility partially offset by an increase in
net amount at risk for variable universal life policies caused by equity market declines. |
|
|
|
Group Benefits loss ratio increased due to unfavorable morbidity experience, which was largely the result of
unfavorable reserve development. |
|
|
|
Group Benefits expense ratio, excluding buyouts decreased for the six months ended June 30, 2009 compared to the
prior year due primarily to lower commission expense on the experience rated business. For the three months ended
June 30, 2009, the expense ratio, excluding buyouts increased due primarily to higher commission expense on the
experience rated business. |
|
|
|
International Japan general insurance expense ratio decreased due to the restructuring of Japans operations. |
|
|
|
International Japan DAC amortization ratio, excluding DAC Unlock and certain realized gains or losses, increased
due to actual gross profits being less than expected as a result of lower fees earned on declining assets
resulting in a higher DAC amortization rate. |
|
|
|
Institutional general insurance expense ratio decreased due to active expense management efforts and reduced
information technology expenses. |
75
Profitability
Management evaluates the rates of return various businesses can provide as an input in determining
where additional capital should be invested to increase net income and shareholder returns. The
Company uses the return on assets for the Individual Annuity, Retirement Plans and Institutional
businesses for evaluating profitability. In Group Benefits and Individual Life, after-tax margin is
a key indicator of overall profitability.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
Ratios |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Retail |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Individual annuity return on assets (ROA) |
|
89.8 |
bps |
|
53.4 |
bps |
|
(128.7 |
) bps |
|
10.8 |
bps |
Effect of net realized gains (losses), net of tax and DAC on ROA [1] |
|
(62.1 |
) bps |
|
(10.8 |
) bps |
|
10.5 |
bps |
|
(47.9 |
) bps |
Effect of DAC Unlock on ROA [2] |
|
120.9 |
bps |
|
|
|
|
|
(168.8 |
) bps |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ROA excluding realized gains (losses) and DAC Unlock |
|
31.0 |
bps |
|
64.2 |
bps |
|
29.6 |
bps |
|
58.7 |
bps |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Individual Life |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
After-tax margin |
|
|
6.3 |
% |
|
|
10.5 |
% |
|
|
(0.3 |
%) |
|
|
9.2 |
% |
Effect of net realized gains (losses), net of tax and DAC on after tax margin [1] |
|
|
(8.1 |
%) |
|
|
(3.4 |
%) |
|
|
(7.1 |
%) |
|
|
(4.8 |
%) |
Effect of DAC Unlock on after-tax margin[2] |
|
|
0.8 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4.6 |
%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
After tax margin excluding realized gains (losses) and DAC Unlock |
|
|
13.6 |
% |
|
|
13.9 |
% |
|
|
11.4 |
% |
|
|
14.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retirement Plans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retirement Plans ROA |
|
(42.8 |
) bps |
|
26.6 |
bps |
|
(67.5 |
) bps |
|
13.8 |
bps |
Effect of net realized gains (losses), net of tax and DAC on ROA [1] |
|
(51.3 |
) bps |
|
(2.4 |
) bps |
|
(42.2 |
) bps |
|
(13.2 |
) bps |
Effect of DAC Unlock on ROA [2] |
|
1.0 |
bps |
|
|
|
|
|
(29.5 |
) bps |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ROA excluding realized gains (losses) and DAC Unlock |
|
7.5 |
bps |
|
29.0 |
bps |
|
4.2 |
bps |
|
27.0 |
bps |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Group Benefits |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
After-tax margin (excluding buyouts) |
|
|
1.2 |
% |
|
|
5.3 |
% |
|
|
3.5 |
% |
|
|
4.7 |
% |
Effect of net realized gains (losses), net of tax on after-tax margin [1] |
|
|
(2.3 |
%) |
|
|
(1.7 |
%) |
|
|
(1.0 |
%) |
|
|
(1.8 |
%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
After-tax margin excluding realized gains (losses) |
|
|
3.5 |
% |
|
|
7.0 |
% |
|
|
4.5 |
% |
|
|
6.5 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
International Japan |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
International Japan ROA |
|
212.8 |
bps |
|
71.6 |
bps |
|
(53.4 |
) bps |
|
43.8 |
bps |
Effect of net realized gains (losses) excluding net periodic settlements, net of
tax and DAC on ROA [1] [3] |
|
(54.4 |
) bps |
|
5.2 |
bps |
|
71.0 |
bps |
|
(27.0 |
) bps |
Effect of DAC Unlock on ROA [2] |
|
217.7 |
bps |
|
|
|
|
|
(142.0 |
) bps |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ROA excluding realized gains (losses) and DAC Unlock |
|
49.5 |
bps |
|
66.4 |
bps |
|
17.6 |
bps |
|
70.8 |
bps |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Institutional |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Institutional ROA |
|
(44.1 |
) bps |
|
(19.4 |
) bps |
|
(80.5 |
) bps |
|
(48.5 |
) bps |
Effect of net realized losses, net of tax and DAC on ROA [1] |
|
(41.4 |
) bps |
|
(36.8 |
) bps |
|
(72.8 |
) bps |
|
(64.3 |
) bps |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ROA excluding realized losses |
|
(2.7 |
) bps |
|
17.4 |
bps |
|
(7.7 |
) bps |
|
15.8 |
bps |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1] |
|
See Realized Capital Gains and Losses by Segment table within the Life Section of the MD&A. |
|
[2] |
|
See Unlock and Sensitivity Analysis within the Critical Accounting Estimates section of the MD&A. |
|
[3] |
|
Included in the net realized capital gain (losses) are amounts that represent the net periodic accruals on
currency rate swaps used in the risk management of Japan fixed annuity products. |
|
|
The decrease in Individual Annuitys ROA, excluding realized gains (losses) and the effect of the DAC
Unlock, reflects significant losses on limited partnership and other alternative investments; and higher DAC rates
due to lower actual gross profits over the past year. |
|
|
|
The decrease in Individual Lifes after-tax margin, excluding realized gains (losses) and the effect of the DAC
Unlock, was due to lower net investment income from limited partnership and other alternative investments and
lower fees from equity market declines, partially offset by favorable mortality volatility, life insurance
in-force growth and lower credited rates. |
|
|
|
The decrease in Retirement Plans ROA, excluding realized gains (losses) and the effect of the DAC Unlock, was
primarily driven by lower returns on limited partnership and other alternative investments. |
|
|
|
The Group Benefit decrease in after-tax margin, excluding realized gains (losses), was primarily due to the
unfavorable loss ratio. |
|
|
|
International-Japan ROA, excluding realized gains (losses) and the effect of the DAC Unlock, declined primarily
due to 3 Win related charges of $40, after tax in the first quarter of 2009. Excluding the effects of the 3 Win
charge ROA would have been 41.2 bps. The decline of ROA excluding the 3 Win charge is due to lower surrender
fees due to a reduction in lapses, an increase in the DAC amortization rate due to lower actual gross profits and
a higher benefit margin. |
|
|
|
The decrease in Institutionals ROA, excluding realized gains (losses), is primarily due to a decline in limited
partnership and other alternative investments income. The decrease is also due to lower yields on fixed maturity
investments. |
76
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
Life Operating Summary |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
Change |
|
Earned premiums |
|
$ |
1,114 |
|
|
$ |
1,305 |
|
|
|
(15 |
%) |
|
$ |
2,432 |
|
|
$ |
2,534 |
|
|
|
(4 |
%) |
Fee income |
|
|
1,059 |
|
|
|
1,381 |
|
|
|
(23 |
%) |
|
|
2,223 |
|
|
|
2,713 |
|
|
|
(18 |
%) |
Net investment income (loss) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities, available-for-sale and other |
|
|
739 |
|
|
|
829 |
|
|
|
(11 |
%) |
|
|
1,428 |
|
|
|
1,648 |
|
|
|
(13 |
%) |
Equity securities, held for trading [1] |
|
|
2,523 |
|
|
|
1,153 |
|
|
|
119 |
% |
|
|
1,799 |
|
|
|
(2,425 |
) |
|
NM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net investment income (loss) |
|
|
3,262 |
|
|
|
1,982 |
|
|
|
65 |
% |
|
|
3,227 |
|
|
|
(777 |
) |
|
NM |
|
Net realized capital gains (losses) |
|
|
(329 |
) |
|
|
(228 |
) |
|
|
(44 |
%) |
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
(1,448 |
) |
|
NM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues [2] |
|
|
5,106 |
|
|
|
4,440 |
|
|
|
15 |
% |
|
|
7,918 |
|
|
|
3,022 |
|
|
|
162 |
% |
Benefits, losses and loss adjustment expenses |
|
|
1,354 |
|
|
|
1,760 |
|
|
|
(23 |
%) |
|
|
4,413 |
|
|
|
3,478 |
|
|
|
27 |
% |
Benefits, losses and loss adjustment
expenses returns credited on International
variable annuities [1] |
|
|
2,523 |
|
|
|
1,153 |
|
|
|
119 |
% |
|
|
1,799 |
|
|
|
(2,425 |
) |
|
NM |
|
Amortization of deferred policy acquisition
costs and present value of future profits |
|
|
156 |
|
|
|
285 |
|
|
|
(45 |
%) |
|
|
1,892 |
|
|
|
230 |
|
|
NM |
|
Insurance operating costs and other expenses |
|
|
844 |
|
|
|
863 |
|
|
|
(2 |
%) |
|
|
1,596 |
|
|
|
1,680 |
|
|
|
(5 |
%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total benefits, losses and expenses |
|
|
4,877 |
|
|
|
4,061 |
|
|
|
20 |
% |
|
|
9,700 |
|
|
|
2,963 |
|
|
NM |
|
Income (loss) before income taxes |
|
|
229 |
|
|
|
379 |
|
|
|
(40 |
%) |
|
|
(1,782 |
) |
|
|
59 |
|
|
NM |
|
Income tax expense (benefit) |
|
|
53 |
|
|
|
45 |
|
|
|
18 |
% |
|
|
(700 |
) |
|
|
(120 |
) |
|
NM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) [3] |
|
$ |
176 |
|
|
$ |
334 |
|
|
|
(47 |
%) |
|
$ |
(1,082 |
) |
|
$ |
179 |
|
|
NM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1] |
|
Net investment income includes investment income and mark-to-market effects of equity securities, trading, supporting the
international variable annuity business, which are classified in net investment income with corresponding amounts credited to
policyholders. |
|
[2] |
|
The transition impact related to the SFAS 157 adoption was a reduction in revenues of $650 for the six months ended June 30, 2008. |
|
[3] |
|
The transition impact related to the SFAS 157 adoption was a reduction in net income of $220
for the six months ended June 30, 2008. |
Three months ended June 30, 2009 compared to the three months ended June 30, 2008
The decrease in Lifes net income was due to the following:
|
|
Realized losses of $329 increased as compared to the comparable prior year period of $228
primarily due to impairments on investment securities. For further discussion, please refer to
the Realized Capital Gains and Losses by Segment table under the Operating Section of the
MD&A. |
|
|
Declines in assets under management in Retail, primarily driven by market depreciation of
$22.2 billion for Individual Annuity and $12.9 billion for retail mutual funds during the last
twelve months, drove declines in fee income. |
|
|
Net investment income on securities, available-for-sale, and other declined primarily due
to declines in limited partnership and other alternative investments and fixed maturities
income. See investment results. |
Partially offsetting the decrease in Lifes net income were the following:
|
|
Life recorded a DAC Unlock benefit of $360, after-tax, during the second quarter of 2009.
See Critical Accounting Estimates of the MD&A for a further discussion on the DAC Unlock. |
Six months ended June 30, 2009 compared to the six months ended June 30, 2008
The decrease in Lifes net income was due to the following:
|
|
Life recorded a DAC Unlock charge of $1.1 billion, after-tax, during the first six months
of 2009. See Critical Accounting Estimates of the MD&A for a further discussion on the DAC
Unlock. |
|
|
Declines in assets under management in Retail, primarily driven by market depreciation of
$22.2 billion for Individual Annuity and $12.9 billion for retail mutual funds during the last
twelve months, drove declines in fee income. |
|
|
Net investment income on securities, available-for-sale and other, declined primarily due
to declines in limited partnership and other alternative investments and fixed maturities
income. See investment results for further discussion. |
Partially offsetting the decrease in Lifes net income were the following:
|
|
Life reported realized gains of $36 in the first six months of 2009 as compared to realized
losses of $1.4 billion in the comparable prior year period. The change from realized losses
to gains is primarily due to gains related to changes in the GMWB liability in Retail and
Other. For further discussion, please refer to the Realized Capital Gains and Losses by
Segment table under the Operating Section of the MD&A. |
77
Investment Results
The following table summarizes Lifes net investment income (loss).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Yield [1] |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Yield [1] |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Yield [1] |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Yield [1] |
|
Fixed maturities [2] |
|
$ |
622 |
|
|
|
4.6 |
% |
|
$ |
711 |
|
|
|
5.4 |
% |
|
$ |
1,267 |
|
|
|
4.6 |
% |
|
$ |
1,466 |
|
|
|
5.5 |
% |
Equity securities, AFS |
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
7.6 |
% |
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
8.6 |
% |
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
7.1 |
% |
|
|
56 |
|
|
|
7.8 |
% |
Mortgage loans |
|
|
70 |
|
|
|
5.0 |
% |
|
|
74 |
|
|
|
6.0 |
% |
|
|
140 |
|
|
|
5.0 |
% |
|
|
143 |
|
|
|
5.9 |
% |
Policy loans |
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
6.6 |
% |
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
6.4 |
% |
|
|
72 |
|
|
|
6.5 |
% |
|
|
67 |
|
|
|
6.3 |
% |
Limited partnerships and
other alternative investments |
|
|
(51 |
) |
|
|
(19.7 |
%) |
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
2.7 |
% |
|
|
(166 |
) |
|
|
(30.6 |
%) |
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
(1.2 |
%) |
Other [3] |
|
|
64 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
120 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(41 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Investment expense |
|
|
(18 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(21 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(36 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(35 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net investment income
excl. equity securities,
trading |
|
|
739 |
|
|
|
4.3 |
% |
|
|
829 |
|
|
|
5.3 |
% |
|
|
1,428 |
|
|
|
4.1 |
% |
|
|
1,648 |
|
|
|
5.3 |
% |
Equity securities, trading [4] |
|
|
2,523 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,153 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,799 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,425 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net investment income
(loss) |
|
$ |
3,262 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,982 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
3,227 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(777 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1] |
|
Yields calculated using net investment income before investment expenses divided by the monthly weighted average
invested assets at cost, amortized cost, or adjusted carrying value, as applicable, excluding collateral received
associated with the securities lending program and consolidated variable interest entity noncontrolling interests.
Included in the fixed maturity yield is other, which primarily relates to fixed maturities (see footnote [3] below).
Included in the total net investment income yield is investment expense. |
|
[2] |
|
Includes net investment income on short-term bonds. |
|
[3] |
|
Includes income from derivatives that qualify for hedge accounting under SFAS 133. These derivatives hedge fixed
maturities. Also includes fees associated with securities lending activities of $(1) and $(4), for the three and six
months ended June 30, 2009, respectively, and $(17) and $(39) for the three and six months ended June 30, 2008,
respectively. The income from securities lending activities is included within fixed maturities. |
|
[4] |
|
Includes investment income and mark-to-market effects of equity securities, trading. |
Three and six months ended June 30, 2009 compared to the three and six months ended June 30,
2008
Net investment income, excluding equity securities, trading, decreased $90, or 11%, and $220, or
13%, for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009, compared to the prior year periods,
primarily due to lower income on fixed maturities and limited partnerships and other alternative
investments. The decline in fixed maturity income was primarily due to lower yield on variable
rate securities due to declines in short-term interest rates and increased allocation to securities
with greater market liquidity but lower yield such as U.S. Treasuries and short-term investments.
A portion of this decline was offset by income from interest rate swaps reported above as other
income. The decline in limited partnerships and other alternative investments income was largely
due to negative re-valuations of the underlying investments associated primarily with the real
estate and private equity markets. Based upon the current interest rate and credit environment,
Life expects a lower average portfolio yield for 2009 as compared to 2008, including a negative
yield on limited partnerships and other alternative investments.
The increase in net investment income on equity securities, trading, for the three and six months
ended June 30, 2009 compared to the prior year period was primarily attributed to the market
performance of the underlying investment funds supporting the Japanese variable annuity product.
78
The primary investment objective of Lifes general account is to maximize economic value consistent
with acceptable risk parameters, including the management of credit risk and interest rate
sensitivity of invested assets, while generating sufficient after-tax income to support
policyholder and corporate obligations.
The following table presents Lifes invested assets by type.
Composition of Invested Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2009 |
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Percent |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Percent |
|
Fixed maturities, AFS, at fair value |
|
$ |
43,980 |
|
|
|
71.5 |
% |
|
$ |
45,182 |
|
|
|
71.3 |
% |
Equity securities, AFS, at fair value |
|
|
642 |
|
|
|
1.0 |
% |
|
|
711 |
|
|
|
1.1 |
% |
Mortgage loans on real estate [1] |
|
|
5,503 |
|
|
|
8.9 |
% |
|
|
5,684 |
|
|
|
9.0 |
% |
Policy loans, at outstanding balance |
|
|
2,204 |
|
|
|
3.6 |
% |
|
|
2,208 |
|
|
|
3.5 |
% |
Limited partnerships and other alternative investments |
|
|
875 |
|
|
|
1.4 |
% |
|
|
1,129 |
|
|
|
1.8 |
% |
Other investments [2] |
|
|
954 |
|
|
|
1.6 |
% |
|
|
1,473 |
|
|
|
2.3 |
% |
Short-term investments |
|
|
7,365 |
|
|
|
12.0 |
% |
|
|
6,937 |
|
|
|
11.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total investments excl. equity securities, trading |
|
|
61,523 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
63,324 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
Equity securities, trading, at fair value [3] |
|
|
30,813 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,820 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total investments |
|
$ |
92,336 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
94,144 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1] |
|
Consist of commercial and agricultural loans. |
|
[2] |
|
Primarily relates to derivative instruments. |
|
[3] |
|
These assets primarily support the International variable annuity
business. Changes in these balances are also reflected in the
respective liabilities. |
Total investments decreased $1.8 billion since December 31, 2008, primarily due to declines in
fixed maturities, other investments, and limited partnerships and other alternative investments,
partially offset by an increased investment in short-term investments. The decline in fixed
maturities is primarily attributable to the unwind of the term lending program of approximately
$2.2 billion, partially offset by improved security valuations due to credit spread tightening.
The decline in other investments primarily related to a decrease in value of derivative instruments
as a result of rising interest rates. Limited partnerships and other alternative investments
declined due to hedge fund redemptions and negative re-valuations of the underlying investments
associated with primarily the real estate and private equity markets. Short-term investments
increased in preparation for funding liability outflows, as well as the contribution to Life of
approximately $500 of funds initially received by the Company from the U.S. Department of
Treasurys Capital Purchase Program. For further information on the Capital Purchase Program, see
the Capital Resources and Liquidity Section of the MD&A.
79
Realized Capital Gains and Losses by Segment
Life includes net realized capital gains and losses in each reporting segment. Following is a
summary of the types of realized gains and losses by segment:
Net realized gains (losses) for three months ended June 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Individual |
|
|
Retirement |
|
|
Group |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retail |
|
|
Life |
|
|
Plans |
|
|
Benefits |
|
|
International |
|
|
Institutional |
|
|
Other |
|
|
Total |
|
Gross gains on sale |
|
$ |
36 |
|
|
$ |
7 |
|
|
$ |
10 |
|
|
$ |
7 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
15 |
|
|
$ |
8 |
|
|
$ |
83 |
|
Gross losses on sale |
|
|
(70 |
) |
|
|
(17 |
) |
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
(16 |
) |
|
|
(9 |
) |
|
|
(29 |
) |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
(148 |
) |
Impairments |
|
|
(52 |
) |
|
|
(11 |
) |
|
|
(40 |
) |
|
|
(12 |
) |
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
(130 |
) |
|
|
(17 |
) |
|
|
(266 |
) |
Japanese fixed annuity
contract hedges, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6 |
) |
Periodic net coupon
settlements on credit
derivatives/Japan |
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
(9 |
) |
Results of variable
annuity hedge program |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GMWB derivatives, net |
|
|
621 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
671 |
|
Macro hedge program |
|
|
(472 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(96 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(568 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total results of
variable annuity hedge
program |
|
|
149 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(46 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
103 |
|
Other, net |
|
|
(67 |
) |
|
|
(25 |
) |
|
|
(43 |
) |
|
|
(20 |
) |
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
51 |
|
|
|
(17 |
) |
|
|
(86 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net realized
capital gains (losses) |
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
(47 |
) |
|
|
(80 |
) |
|
|
(41 |
) |
|
|
(28 |
) |
|
|
(95 |
) |
|
|
(30 |
) |
|
|
(329 |
) |
Income tax expense
(benefit) and DAC |
|
|
115 |
|
|
|
(20 |
) |
|
|
(32 |
) |
|
|
(14 |
) |
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
(32 |
) |
|
|
(13 |
) |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total gains (losses),
net of tax and DAC |
|
$ |
(123 |
) |
|
$ |
(27 |
) |
|
$ |
(48 |
) |
|
$ |
(27 |
) |
|
$ |
(22 |
) |
|
$ |
(63 |
) |
|
$ |
(17 |
) |
|
$ |
(327 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net realized gains (losses) for three months ended June 30, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Individual |
|
|
Retirement |
|
|
Group |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retail |
|
|
Life |
|
|
Plans |
|
|
Benefits |
|
|
International |
|
|
Institutional |
|
|
Other |
|
|
Total |
|
Gross gains on sale |
|
$ |
6 |
|
|
$ |
2 |
|
|
$ |
4 |
|
|
$ |
7 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
12 |
|
|
$ |
10 |
|
|
$ |
41 |
|
Gross losses on sale |
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(32 |
) |
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
(45 |
) |
Impairments |
|
|
(31 |
) |
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
(9 |
) |
|
|
(33 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(45 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(124 |
) |
Japanese fixed annuity
contract hedges, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9 |
) |
Periodic net coupon
settlements on credit
derivatives/Japan |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11 |
) |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
(11 |
) |
Results of variable
annuity hedge program |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GMWB derivatives, net |
|
|
(15 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(13 |
) |
Macro hedge program |
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total results of
variable annuity hedge
program |
|
|
(19 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(17 |
) |
Other, net |
|
|
(17 |
) |
|
|
(13 |
) |
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
(23 |
) |
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
(63 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net realized capital gains (losses) |
|
|
(72 |
) |
|
|
(23 |
) |
|
|
(19 |
) |
|
|
(37 |
) |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
(87 |
) |
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
(228 |
) |
Income tax expense
(benefit) and DAC |
|
|
(40 |
) |
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
(16 |
) |
|
|
(14 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(31 |
) |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
(108 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total gains (losses),
net of tax and DAC |
|
$ |
(32 |
) |
|
$ |
(13 |
) |
|
$ |
(3 |
) |
|
$ |
(23 |
) |
|
$ |
3 |
|
|
$ |
(56 |
) |
|
$ |
4 |
|
|
$ |
(120 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
80
Net realized gains (losses) for six months ended June 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Individual |
|
|
Retirement |
|
|
Group |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retail |
|
|
Life |
|
|
Plans |
|
|
Benefits |
|
|
International |
|
|
Institutional |
|
|
Other |
|
|
Total |
|
Gross gains on sale |
|
$ |
52 |
|
|
$ |
11 |
|
|
$ |
18 |
|
|
$ |
15 |
|
|
$ |
58 |
|
|
$ |
29 |
|
|
$ |
36 |
|
|
$ |
219 |
|
Gross losses on sale |
|
|
(290 |
) |
|
|
(22 |
) |
|
|
(37 |
) |
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
(54 |
) |
|
|
(111 |
) |
|
|
(17 |
) |
|
|
(537 |
) |
Impairments |
|
|
(85 |
) |
|
|
(13 |
) |
|
|
(47 |
) |
|
|
(18 |
) |
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
(238 |
) |
|
|
(44 |
) |
|
|
(451 |
) |
Japanese fixed annuity
contract hedges, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35 |
|
Periodic net coupon
settlements on credit
derivatives/Japan |
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
(25 |
) |
Results of variable
annuity hedge program |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GMWB derivatives, net |
|
|
1,215 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
45 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,260 |
|
Macro hedge program |
|
|
(314 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(50 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(364 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total results of
variable annuity hedge
program |
|
|
901 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
896 |
|
Other, net |
|
|
(108 |
) |
|
|
(54 |
) |
|
|
(69 |
) |
|
|
(28 |
) |
|
|
193 |
|
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
(25 |
) |
|
|
(101 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net realized
capital gains (losses) |
|
|
462 |
|
|
|
(80 |
) |
|
|
(139 |
) |
|
|
(38 |
) |
|
|
218 |
|
|
|
(334 |
) |
|
|
(53 |
) |
|
|
36 |
|
Income tax expense
(benefit) and DAC |
|
|
406 |
|
|
|
(34 |
) |
|
|
(56 |
) |
|
|
(13 |
) |
|
|
82 |
|
|
|
(116 |
) |
|
|
(19 |
) |
|
|
250 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total gains (losses),
net of tax and DAC |
|
$ |
56 |
|
|
$ |
(46 |
) |
|
$ |
(83 |
) |
|
$ |
(25 |
) |
|
$ |
136 |
|
|
$ |
(218 |
) |
|
$ |
(34 |
) |
|
$ |
(214 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net realized gains (losses) for six months ended June 30, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Individual |
|
|
Retirement |
|
|
Group |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retail |
|
|
Life |
|
|
Plans |
|
|
Benefits |
|
|
International |
|
|
Institutional |
|
|
Other |
|
|
Total |
|
Gross gains on sale |
|
$ |
20 |
|
|
$ |
2 |
|
|
$ |
7 |
|
|
$ |
13 |
|
|
$ |
(1 |
) |
|
$ |
13 |
|
|
$ |
30 |
|
|
$ |
84 |
|
Gross losses on sale |
|
|
(28 |
) |
|
|
(15 |
) |
|
|
(21 |
) |
|
|
(15 |
) |
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
(47 |
) |
|
|
(19 |
) |
|
|
(155 |
) |
Impairments |
|
|
(64 |
) |
|
|
(32 |
) |
|
|
(36 |
) |
|
|
(40 |
) |
|
|
(22 |
) |
|
|
(151 |
) |
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
(355 |
) |
Japanese fixed annuity
contract hedges, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(23 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(23 |
) |
Periodic net coupon
settlements on credit
derivatives/Japan |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(18 |
) |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
(18 |
) |
SFAS 157 transition impact |
|
|
(616 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(34 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(650 |
) |
Results of variable
annuity hedge program |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GMWB derivatives, net |
|
|
(126 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(123 |
) |
Macro hedge program |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total results of variable annuity hedge program |
|
|
(121 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(118 |
) |
Other, net |
|
|
(17 |
) |
|
|
(11 |
) |
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
(31 |
) |
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
(122 |
) |
|
|
(22 |
) |
|
|
(213 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net realized
capital losses |
|
|
(828 |
) |
|
|
(57 |
) |
|
|
(55 |
) |
|
|
(73 |
) |
|
|
(111 |
) |
|
|
(306 |
) |
|
|
(18 |
) |
|
|
(1,448 |
) |
Income tax benefit and DAC |
|
|
(534 |
) |
|
|
(23 |
) |
|
|
(29 |
) |
|
|
(26 |
) |
|
|
(50 |
) |
|
|
(108 |
) |
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
(778 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total losses, net of tax
and DAC |
|
$ |
(294 |
) |
|
$ |
(34 |
) |
|
$ |
(26 |
) |
|
$ |
(47 |
) |
|
$ |
(61 |
) |
|
$ |
(198 |
) |
|
$ |
(10 |
) |
|
$ |
(670 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
81
For the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, the circumstances giving rise to
the net realized capital gains and losses in these components are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Gross gains and losses on sale
|
|
|
|
Gross gains on sale for the
three and six months ended June 30,
2009 were predominantly within
corporate, government and CMO
securities. Gross losses were
primarily within financial services,
government and CMBS. These losses
resulted primarily from an effort to
reduce portfolio risk while
simultaneously reallocating the
portfolio to securities with more
favorable risk/return profiles. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross gains on sales for the
three and six months ended June 30,
2008 were predominantly within fixed
maturities and were primarily
comprised of corporate securities.
Gross losses on sales for the three
and six months ended June 30, 2008
were primarily comprised of
corporate securities, municipal
securities and CMBS, as well as $17
of CLOs. Gross gains and losses on
sale, excluding the loss on CLOs,
primarily resulted from the decision
to reallocate the portfolio to
securities with more favorable
risk/return profiles. |
|
|
|
|
|
Net impairment losses
|
|
|
|
For further information, see
Other-Than-Temporary Impairment
Losses within the Investment Credit
Risk Section of the MD&A. |
|
|
|
|
|
Variable annuity hedge program
|
|
|
|
The net gain associated with
GMWB related derivatives for the
three and six months ended June 30,
2009, was primarily due to
market-based valuation changes,
including a decrease in equity
volatility levels and an increase in
interest rates, as well as
policyholder behavior and liability
model assumption updates. For more
information on the policyholder
behavior and liability model
assumption updates, refer to Note 4
of the Notes to Condensed
Consolidated Financial Statements.
The net loss on the macro hedge
program was primarily the result of
an increase in the equity markets
and the impact of trading activity. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The net losses on GMWB
related derivatives for the six
months ended June 30, 2008, were
primarily due to the transition to
SFAS 157 and liability model
assumption updates for mortality. |
|
|
|
|
|
Other, net
|
|
|
|
Other, net losses for the
three months ended June 30, 2009
primarily resulted from net losses
on credit derivatives used to
economically hedge fixed maturities
driven by credit spread tightening
and transactional foreign currency,
predominately on the internal
reinsurance of the Japan variable
annuity business, which is entirely
offset in OCI. Also included were
valuation allowances on impaired
mortgage loans of $38. These losses
were partially offset by net gains
related to the Japan 3Win contract
hedges resulting from rising
interest rates. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other, net losses for the
six months ended June 30, 2009
primarily resulted from net losses
on credit derivatives used to
economically hedge fixed maturities
driven by credit spread tightening
and valuation allowances on impaired
mortgage loans of $85. These losses
were offset by net gains related to
transactional foreign currency and
the Japan 3Win contract hedges. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other, net losses for the
three and six months ended June 30,
2008 were primarily related to net
losses on credit derivatives of $50
and $207, respectively. The net
losses on credit derivatives in the
first quarter were due to
significant credit spread widening
on credit derivatives that assume
credit exposure. The net losses on
credit derivatives in the second
quarter were due to credit spreads
tightening significantly on credit
derivatives that reduce credit
exposure on certain referenced
corporate entities. Included in the
six months ended June 30, 2008 were
losses incurred on HIMCO managed
CLOs. |
82
RETAIL
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
Operating Summary |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
Change |
|
Fee income and other |
|
$ |
481 |
|
|
$ |
759 |
|
|
|
(37 |
%) |
|
$ |
1,034 |
|
|
$ |
1,506 |
|
|
|
(31 |
%) |
Earned premiums |
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
43 |
% |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
(13 |
) |
|
|
85 |
% |
Net investment income |
|
|
178 |
|
|
|
192 |
|
|
|
(7 |
%) |
|
|
358 |
|
|
|
383 |
|
|
|
(7 |
%) |
Net realized capital gains (losses) |
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
(72 |
) |
|
|
89 |
% |
|
|
462 |
|
|
|
(828 |
) |
|
NM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues [1] |
|
|
647 |
|
|
|
872 |
|
|
|
(26 |
%) |
|
|
1,852 |
|
|
|
1,048 |
|
|
|
77 |
% |
Benefits, losses and loss adjustment expenses |
|
|
90 |
|
|
|
193 |
|
|
|
(53 |
%) |
|
|
946 |
|
|
|
390 |
|
|
|
143 |
% |
Insurance operating costs and other expenses |
|
|
260 |
|
|
|
327 |
|
|
|
(20 |
%) |
|
|
505 |
|
|
|
639 |
|
|
|
(21 |
%) |
Amortization of deferred policy acquisition
costs and present value of future profits |
|
|
52 |
|
|
|
168 |
|
|
|
(69 |
%) |
|
|
1,353 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
NM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total benefits, losses and expenses |
|
|
402 |
|
|
|
688 |
|
|
|
(42 |
%) |
|
|
2,804 |
|
|
|
1,041 |
|
|
|
169 |
% |
Income (loss) before income taxes |
|
|
245 |
|
|
|
184 |
|
|
|
33 |
% |
|
|
(952 |
) |
|
|
7 |
|
|
NM |
|
Income tax expense (benefit) |
|
|
53 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
NM |
|
|
|
(400 |
) |
|
|
(86 |
) |
|
NM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) [2] |
|
$ |
192 |
|
|
$ |
170 |
|
|
|
13 |
% |
|
$ |
(552 |
) |
|
$ |
93 |
|
|
NM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets Under Management |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Individual variable annuity account values |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
75,613 |
|
|
$ |
105,345 |
|
|
|
(28 |
%) |
Individual fixed annuity and other account values |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,949 |
|
|
|
10,366 |
|
|
|
15 |
% |
Other retail products account values [3] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
578 |
|
|
|
(100 |
%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total account values [4] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
87,562 |
|
|
|
116,289 |
|
|
|
(25 |
%) |
Retail mutual fund assets under management |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34,708 |
|
|
|
47,239 |
|
|
|
(27 |
%) |
Other mutual fund assets under management |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
985 |
|
|
|
2,276 |
|
|
|
(57 |
%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total mutual fund assets under management |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35,693 |
|
|
|
49,515 |
|
|
|
(28 |
%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets under management |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
123,255 |
|
|
$ |
165,804 |
|
|
|
(26 |
%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1] |
|
During the six months ended June 30, 2008, the transition impact related to the SFAS 157 adoption was a reduction in revenues of $616. |
|
[2] |
|
During the six months ended June 30, 2008, the transition impact related to the SFAS 157 adoption was a reduction in net income of $209. |
|
[3] |
|
Specialty products / Other transferred to International, effective January 1, 2009 on a prospective basis. |
|
[4] |
|
Includes policyholders balances for investment contracts and reserves for future policy benefits for insurance contracts. |
Three and six months ended June 30, 2009 compared to the three and six months ended June 30,
2008
Net income increased for the three months ended June 30, 2009 primarily related to the second
quarter 2009 DAC Unlock benefit of $253. The DAC Unlock benefit was driven by improvements in
equity markets since the first quarter of 2009. Partially offsetting the impact of the DAC Unlock
was the effect of equity market declines, compared to the second quarter 2008, on variable annuity
and mutual fund fee income.
Net income decreased for the six months ended June 30, 2009 primarily due to the net impact of the
2009 DAC Unlocks. Individual Annuity incurred a $985 DAC Unlock charge in the first quarter 2009,
partially offset by the $253 DAC Unlock benefit in the second quarter 2009. Also contributing to
the decrease was the effect of equity market declines on variable annuity and mutual fund income.
Net realized capital gains (losses) improved for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009. The
changes in net realized capital gains and losses primarily relate to the results of the U.S.
variable annuity hedge program. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2009, the net GMWB
realized gain was $621 and $1.2 billion, respectively, due primarily to changes in volatility
levels and interest rates, basis differentials, and assumption updates in the Companys hedging
models. Offsetting the net gain on GMWB financial instruments were losses on the Companys macro
hedge program of $472 and $314 for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009, respectively.
Losses on the macro hedge program were primarily driven by increases in equity markets.
83
For further discussion of realized capital gains and losses, see the Realized Capital Gains and
Losses by Segment table under Lifes Operating Section of the MD&A. For further discussion of the
2009 Unlocks, see the Critical Accounting Estimates section of the MD&A. The following other
factors contributed to the changes in net income:
|
|
|
|
|
Fee income and other
|
|
|
|
Fee income and other
decreased primarily as a result of
lower variable annuity fee income
due to a decline in average account
values. The decrease in average
variable annuity account values can
be attributed to market depreciation
of $22.7 billion and net outflows of
$7.0 billion during the last 12
months. Net outflows were driven by
decreased sales, and continued
surrender activity resulting from
the aging of the variable annuity
in-force block of business. Also
contributing to the decrease in fee
income was lower mutual fund fees
due to declining assets under
management primarily driven by
market depreciation of $12.9
billion, partially offset by $445 of
net flows during the last 12 months. |
|
|
|
|
|
Net investment income
|
|
|
|
Net investment income was
lower primarily due to a decline in
income from limited partnerships and
other alternative investments,
combined with lower yields on fixed
maturities primarily due to
short-term interest rate declines
and a greater percentage of
short-term investments in the asset
portfolio, partially offset by an
increase in general account assets. |
|
|
|
|
|
Benefits, losses and loss adjustment
expenses
|
|
|
|
For the three months ended
June 30, 2009 benefits, losses and
loss adjustment expenses decreased
primarily as a result of the impact
of the second quarter 2009 Unlock. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the six months ended
June 30, 2009, benefits, losses and
loss adjustment expenses increased
primarily as a result of the impact
of the net 2009 Unlocks which
increased the benefit ratio used in
the calculation of GMDB reserves. |
|
|
|
|
|
Insurance operating costs and other
expenses
|
|
|
|
Insurance operating costs
and other expenses decreased
primarily as a result of lower asset
based trail commissions due to
equity market declines. |
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of deferred policy
acquisition costs and present value
of future profits (DAC)
|
|
|
|
For the three months ended
June 30, 2009, amortization of DAC
decreased primarily due to the
impact of the second quarter 2009
Unlock benefit as compared to the
second quarter of 2008, when there
was no Unlock. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the six months ended
June 30, 2009, amortization of DAC
increased primarily due to the net
impact of the 2009 Unlocks as
compared to 2008, when there was no
Unlock. Additionally, the adoption
of SFAS 157 at the beginning of the
first quarter of 2008 resulted in a
DAC benefit. |
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax expense (benefit)
|
|
|
|
For the three months ended
June 30, 2009 income tax expense
increased compared with the
respective prior year period as a
result of higher pre-tax income and
a decline in DRD and other permanent
differences. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the six months ended
June 30, 2009, the income tax
benefit is caused by the pre-tax
losses driven by the factors
previously discussed. The difference
from a 35% tax rate is caused by the
recognition of tax benefits
associated with the dividends
received deduction and foreign tax
credits. For the six months ended
June 30, 2008, the income tax
benefit on the pre-tax income is
caused by the recognition of tax
benefits associated with the
dividends received deduction and
foreign tax credits. |
84
INDIVIDUAL LIFE
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
Operating Summary |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
Change |
|
Fee income and other |
|
$ |
238 |
|
|
$ |
235 |
|
|
|
1 |
% |
|
$ |
530 |
|
|
$ |
455 |
|
|
|
16 |
% |
Earned premiums |
|
|
(20 |
) |
|
|
(19 |
) |
|
|
(5 |
%) |
|
|
(39 |
) |
|
|
(37 |
) |
|
|
(5 |
%) |
Net investment income |
|
|
84 |
|
|
|
92 |
|
|
|
(9 |
%) |
|
|
163 |
|
|
|
180 |
|
|
|
(9 |
%) |
Net realized capital losses |
|
|
(47 |
) |
|
|
(23 |
) |
|
|
(104 |
%) |
|
|
(80 |
) |
|
|
(57 |
) |
|
|
(40 |
%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
|
255 |
|
|
|
285 |
|
|
|
(11 |
%) |
|
|
574 |
|
|
|
541 |
|
|
|
6 |
% |
Benefits, losses and loss adjustment expenses |
|
|
147 |
|
|
|
153 |
|
|
|
(4 |
%) |
|
|
311 |
|
|
|
307 |
|
|
|
1 |
% |
Insurance operating costs and other expenses |
|
|
46 |
|
|
|
51 |
|
|
|
(10 |
%) |
|
|
94 |
|
|
|
98 |
|
|
|
(4 |
%) |
Amortization of deferred policy acquisition
costs and present value of future profits |
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
3 |
% |
|
|
180 |
|
|
|
69 |
|
|
|
161 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total benefits, losses and expenses |
|
|
234 |
|
|
|
244 |
|
|
|
(4 |
%) |
|
|
585 |
|
|
|
474 |
|
|
|
23 |
% |
Income (loss) before income taxes |
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
(49 |
%) |
|
|
(11 |
) |
|
|
67 |
|
|
NM |
|
Income tax expense (benefit) |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
(55 |
%) |
|
|
(9 |
) |
|
|
17 |
|
|
NM |
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
16 |
|
|
$ |
30 |
|
|
|
(47 |
%) |
|
$ |
(2 |
) |
|
$ |
50 |
|
|
NM |
|
Account Values |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Variable universal life insurance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
5,049 |
|
|
$ |
6,625 |
|
|
|
(24 |
%) |
Universal life/interest sensitive whole life |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,876 |
|
|
|
4,569 |
|
|
|
7 |
% |
Modified guaranteed life and other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
634 |
|
|
|
664 |
|
|
|
(5 |
%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total account values |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
10,559 |
|
|
$ |
11,858 |
|
|
|
(11 |
%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Life Insurance In-force |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Variable universal life insurance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
76,946 |
|
|
$ |
78,557 |
|
|
|
(2 |
%) |
Universal life/interest sensitive whole life |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
53,213 |
|
|
|
50,298 |
|
|
|
6 |
% |
Term life |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
66,955 |
|
|
|
57,371 |
|
|
|
17 |
% |
Modified guaranteed life and other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
926 |
|
|
|
947 |
|
|
|
(2 |
%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total life insurance in-force |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
198,040 |
|
|
$ |
187,173 |
|
|
|
6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three and six months ended June 30, 2009 compared to the three and six months ended June 30, 2008
Net income decreased for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009, driven primarily by net
realized capital losses and the impact of the Unlock in the first quarter of 2009. For further
discussion on the Unlock, see the Critical Accounting Estimates section of the MD&A. For further
discussion of net realized capital losses, see Realized Capital Gains and Losses by Segment table
under Lifes Operating section of the MD&A. The following other factors contributed to the changes
in net income:
|
|
|
|
|
Fee income and other
|
|
|
|
Fee income and other
increased for the three and six
months ended June 30, 2009
primarily due to an increase in
cost of insurance charges of $10
and $22, respectively, as a result
of growth in guaranteed universal
life insurance in-force. Also
contributing to the increase in the
six months ended June 30, 2009 was
the impact of the first quarter
2009 Unlock. Partially offsetting
these increases were lower variable
life fees as a result of equity
market declines. |
|
|
|
|
|
Net investment income
|
|
|
|
Net investment income was
lower for the three and six months
ended June 30, 2009 primarily due
to a decline in income from limited
partnership and other alternative
investments of $7 and $19,
respectively, combined with lower
yields on fixed maturity
investments, partially offset by
growth in general account values. |
|
|
|
|
|
Benefits, losses and loss adjustment
expenses
|
|
|
|
Benefits, losses and loss
adjustment expenses for the three
months ended June 30, 2009 improved
slightly over the prior year period
due to lower death benefits related
to favorable mortality experience
partially offset by increased
claims costs as a result of an
increase in net amount at risk for
variable universal life policies
caused by equity market declines.
For the six months ended June 30,
2009, benefits, losses, and loss
adjustment expenses increased
slightly over the prior year
period as a result of reserve
increases on certain products
partially offset by favorable
mortality experience. |
85
|
|
|
|
|
Insurance operating costs and other
expenses
|
|
|
|
Insurance operating costs
and other expenses decreased as a
result of continued active expense
management efforts. |
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of DAC
|
|
|
|
Amortization of DAC
increased primarily as a result of
the Unlock charge in the first
quarter of 2009, partially offset
by reduced DAC amortization
primarily attributed to net
realized capital losses. This
increase in DAC amortization had a
partial offset in amortization of
deferred revenues, included in fee
income. |
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax expense (benefit)
|
|
|
|
For the three and six
months ended June 30, 2009, the
income tax expense (benefit) as
compared to the prior years income
tax expense was a result of lower
earnings before income taxes
primarily due to an increase in net
realized capital losses and the
effects of the first quarter 2009
Unlock. |
86
RETIREMENT PLANS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
Operating Summary |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
Change |
|
Fee income and other |
|
$ |
79 |
|
|
$ |
97 |
|
|
|
(19 |
%) |
|
$ |
151 |
|
|
$ |
165 |
|
|
|
(8 |
%) |
Earned premiums |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
Net investment income |
|
|
80 |
|
|
|
91 |
|
|
|
(12 |
%) |
|
|
157 |
|
|
|
180 |
|
|
|
(13 |
%) |
Net realized capital losses |
|
|
(80 |
) |
|
|
(19 |
) |
|
NM |
|
|
|
(139 |
) |
|
|
(55 |
) |
|
|
(153 |
%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
|
80 |
|
|
|
170 |
|
|
|
(53 |
%) |
|
|
171 |
|
|
|
292 |
|
|
|
(41 |
%) |
Benefits, losses and loss adjustment expenses |
|
|
68 |
|
|
|
66 |
|
|
|
3 |
% |
|
|
142 |
|
|
|
131 |
|
|
|
8 |
% |
Insurance operating costs and other expenses |
|
|
81 |
|
|
|
92 |
|
|
|
(12 |
%) |
|
|
160 |
|
|
|
153 |
|
|
|
5 |
% |
Amortization of deferred policy acquisition
costs and present value of future profits |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
63 |
% |
|
|
78 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
NM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total benefits, losses and expenses |
|
|
146 |
|
|
|
150 |
|
|
|
(3 |
%) |
|
|
380 |
|
|
|
283 |
|
|
|
34 |
% |
Income (loss) before income taxes |
|
|
(66 |
) |
|
|
20 |
|
|
NM |
|
|
|
(209 |
) |
|
|
9 |
|
|
NM |
|
Income tax benefit |
|
|
(26 |
) |
|
|
(11 |
) |
|
|
(136 |
%) |
|
|
(81 |
) |
|
|
(17 |
) |
|
NM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
(40 |
) |
|
$ |
31 |
|
|
NM |
|
|
$ |
(128 |
) |
|
$ |
26 |
|
|
NM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets Under Management |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
403(b)/457 account values |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
9,955 |
|
|
$ |
12,197 |
|
|
|
(18 |
%) |
401(k) account values |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,535 |
|
|
|
14,832 |
|
|
|
(9 |
%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total account values [1] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,490 |
|
|
|
27,029 |
|
|
|
(13 |
%) |
403(b)/457 mutual fund assets under management |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
165 |
|
|
|
106 |
|
|
|
56 |
% |
401(k) mutual fund assets under management |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,177 |
|
|
|
19,748 |
|
|
|
(23 |
%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total mutual fund assets under management |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,342 |
|
|
|
19,854 |
|
|
|
(23 |
%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets under management |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
38,832 |
|
|
$ |
46,883 |
|
|
|
(17 |
%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets under administration 401(k) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
5,372 |
|
|
$ |
6,282 |
|
|
|
(14 |
%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1] |
|
Includes policyholder balances for investment contracts and reserves for future policy
benefits for insurance contracts. |
Three and six months ended June 30, 2009 compared to the three and six months ended June 30,
2008
Net loss in Retirement Plans increased due to higher net realized capital losses, the DAC Unlock in
the first quarter of 2009 and lower net investment income. For further discussion of net realized
capital losses, see Realized Capital Gains and Losses by Segment table under Lifes Operating
section of the MD&A. For further discussion of the DAC Unlock, see the Critical Accounting
Estimates section of the MD&A. The following other factors contributed to the changes in net
income:
|
|
|
|
|
Fee income and other
|
|
|
|
For the three and six months
ended June 30, 2009, fee income and
other decreased primarily due to
lower average account values as a
result of market depreciation of
$8.0 billion over the past 12
months. |
|
|
|
|
|
Net investment income
|
|
|
|
Net investment income
declined due to a decrease in the
returns from limited partnership and
other alternative investment income. |
|
|
|
|
|
Insurance operating costs and other
expenses
|
|
|
|
Insurance operating costs
and other expenses decreased for the
three months ended June 30, 2009 due
to expense management initiatives
and higher expenses incurred in the
prior year period associated with
the acquired businesses. For the
six months ended June 30, 2009,
insurance operating costs and other
expenses increased primarily due to
the first half of 2009 including a
full six months of operating
expenses associated with the
businesses acquired in the latter
part of the first quarter of 2008. |
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of DAC
|
|
|
|
Amortization of deferred
policy acquisition costs and present
value of future profits increased
for the six months ended June 30,
2009 as a result of the DAC Unlock
in the first quarter of 2009. |
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax benefit
|
|
|
|
For the three and six months
ended June 30, 2009 the income tax
benefit is greater than the prior
year periods income tax benefit due
to lower income before income taxes
primarily due to increased realized
capital losses and the DAC Unlock in
the first quarter of 2009.
Differences from tax rates of 35%
are caused by the recognition of tax
benefits associated with the
dividends received deduction. |
87
GROUP BENEFITS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
Operating Summary |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
Change |
|
Premiums and other considerations |
|
$ |
1,074 |
|
|
$ |
1,100 |
|
|
|
(2 |
%) |
|
$ |
2,212 |
|
|
$ |
2,174 |
|
|
|
2 |
% |
Net investment income |
|
|
102 |
|
|
|
113 |
|
|
|
(10 |
%) |
|
|
193 |
|
|
|
219 |
|
|
|
(12 |
%) |
Net realized capital losses |
|
|
(41 |
) |
|
|
(37 |
) |
|
|
(11 |
%) |
|
|
(38 |
) |
|
|
(73 |
) |
|
|
48 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
|
1,135 |
|
|
|
1,176 |
|
|
|
(3 |
%) |
|
|
2,367 |
|
|
|
2,320 |
|
|
|
2 |
% |
Benefits, losses and loss adjustment expenses |
|
|
822 |
|
|
|
811 |
|
|
|
1 |
% |
|
|
1,682 |
|
|
|
1,599 |
|
|
|
5 |
% |
Insurance operating costs and other expenses |
|
|
287 |
|
|
|
270 |
|
|
|
6 |
% |
|
|
551 |
|
|
|
555 |
|
|
|
(1 |
%) |
Amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs |
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
7 |
% |
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
7 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total benefits, losses and expenses |
|
|
1,124 |
|
|
|
1,095 |
|
|
|
3 |
% |
|
|
2,262 |
|
|
|
2,181 |
|
|
|
4 |
% |
Income before income taxes |
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
81 |
|
|
|
(86 |
%) |
|
|
105 |
|
|
|
139 |
|
|
|
(24 |
%) |
Income tax expense (benefit) |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
19 |
|
|
NM |
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
(29 |
%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
14 |
|
|
$ |
62 |
|
|
|
(77 |
%) |
|
$ |
83 |
|
|
$ |
108 |
|
|
|
(23 |
%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earned Premiums and Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fully insured ongoing premiums |
|
$ |
1,066 |
|
|
$ |
1,090 |
|
|
|
(2 |
%) |
|
$ |
2,192 |
|
|
$ |
2,156 |
|
|
|
2 |
% |
Other |
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
(20 |
%) |
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
11 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total earned premiums and other |
|
$ |
1,074 |
|
|
$ |
1,100 |
|
|
|
(2 |
%) |
|
$ |
2,212 |
|
|
$ |
2,174 |
|
|
|
2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ratios, excluding buyouts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss ratio |
|
|
76.5 |
% |
|
|
73.7 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
76.0 |
% |
|
|
73.6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Loss ratio, excluding financial institutions |
|
|
81.8 |
% |
|
|
77.8 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
80.2 |
% |
|
|
78.3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Expense ratio |
|
|
28.1 |
% |
|
|
25.8 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
26.2 |
% |
|
|
26.8 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Expense ratio, excluding financial institutions |
|
|
23.4 |
% |
|
|
22.3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
22.4 |
% |
|
|
22.4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Three and six months ended June 30, 2009 compared to the three and six months ended June 30, 2008
The decrease in net income for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009, was primarily due to
higher benefits, losses and loss adjustment expenses and lower net investment income. Partially
offsetting the decline for the six months ended June 30, 2009 was lower realized capital losses in
2009 as compared to 2008. For further discussion, see Realized Capital Gains and Losses by Segment
table under Lifes Operating Section of the MD&A. The following other factors contributed to the
changes in net income:
|
|
|
|
|
Premiums and other considerations
|
|
|
|
Premiums and other
considerations increased for the six
months ended June 30, 2009, largely
due to business growth driven by new
sales and persistency over the last
twelve months. However, premiums
and other considerations decreased
for the three months ended June 30,
2009 due primarily to reductions in
the covered lives within our
customer base, slightly higher
cancellations and higher ceded
premiums for certain reinsurance
contracts. |
|
|
|
|
|
Net investment income
|
|
|
|
For the three and six months
ended June 30, 2009, net investment
income decreased primarily as a
result of lower yields on fixed
maturity investments and lower
limited partnership and other
alternative investment returns. |
|
|
|
|
|
Benefits, losses and loss adjustment
expenses/Loss ratio
|
|
|
|
The segments loss ratio
(defined as benefits, losses and
loss adjustment expenses as a
percentage of premiums and other
considerations excluding buyouts)
increased primarily due to
unfavorable morbidity experience,
which was largely the result of
unfavorable reserve development from
the 2008 incurral loss year. The
experience rated financial
institutions business also
contributed to the unfavorable
results for the six months ended,
but was favorable for the three
months ended. The impact of the
experience rated business inversely
affects the commission expense. |
|
|
|
|
|
Expense ratio
|
|
|
|
The segments expense ratio,
excluding buyouts decreased for the
six months ended June 30, 2009
compared to the prior year due
primarily to lower commission
expense on the experience rated
business. For the three months
ended June 30, 2009, the expense
ratio, excluding buyouts increased
due primarily to higher commission
expense on the experience rated
business. |
88
INTERNATIONAL
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
Operating Summary |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
Change |
|
Fee income |
|
$ |
199 |
|
|
$ |
229 |
|
|
|
(13 |
%) |
|
$ |
383 |
|
|
$ |
459 |
|
|
|
(17 |
%) |
Earned premiums |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
67 |
% |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
40 |
% |
Net investment income |
|
|
52 |
|
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
37 |
% |
|
|
96 |
|
|
|
70 |
|
|
|
37 |
% |
Net realized capital gains (losses) |
|
|
(28 |
) |
|
|
2 |
|
|
NM |
|
|
|
218 |
|
|
|
(111 |
) |
|
NM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues [1] |
|
|
222 |
|
|
|
266 |
|
|
|
(17 |
%) |
|
|
694 |
|
|
|
413 |
|
|
|
68 |
% |
Benefits, losses and loss adjustment expenses |
|
|
(115 |
) |
|
|
15 |
|
|
NM |
|
|
|
515 |
|
|
|
31 |
|
|
NM |
|
Insurance operating costs and other expenses |
|
|
81 |
|
|
|
80 |
|
|
|
1 |
% |
|
|
165 |
|
|
|
150 |
|
|
|
10 |
% |
Amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs
and present value of future profits |
|
|
49 |
|
|
|
66 |
|
|
|
(26 |
%) |
|
|
245 |
|
|
|
112 |
|
|
|
119 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total benefits, losses and expenses |
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
161 |
|
|
|
(91 |
%) |
|
|
925 |
|
|
|
293 |
|
|
NM |
|
Income (loss) before income taxes |
|
|
207 |
|
|
|
105 |
|
|
|
97 |
% |
|
|
(231 |
) |
|
|
120 |
|
|
NM |
|
Income tax expense (benefit) |
|
|
88 |
|
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
167 |
% |
|
|
(57 |
) |
|
|
40 |
|
|
NM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income [2] |
|
$ |
119 |
|
|
$ |
72 |
|
|
|
65 |
% |
|
$ |
(174 |
) |
|
$ |
80 |
|
|
NM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets Under Management Japan |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Japan variable annuity account values |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
29,272 |
|
|
$ |
35,910 |
|
|
|
(18 |
%) |
Japan MVA fixed annuity and other account values [3] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,437 |
|
|
|
2,212 |
|
|
|
101 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets under management Japan |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
33,709 |
|
|
$ |
38,122 |
|
|
|
(12 |
%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1] |
|
The transition impact related to the SFAS 157 adoption was a reduction in revenues of $34 during the six months ended June 30, 2008. |
|
[2] |
|
The transition impact related to the SFAS 157 adoption was a reduction in net income of $11 during the six months ended June 30, 2008. |
|
[3] |
|
Japan fixed annuity and other account values includes an increase due to the net triggering
impact of the GMIB pay-out annuity account value for the 3 Win product of $1.9 billion as of
June 30, 2009. |
Three and six months ended June 30, 2009 compared to the three and six months ended June 30,
2008
Net income increased for the three months ended June 30, 2009 as a result of a favorable second
quarter 2009 Unlock, partially offset by a decrease in fee income and increased realized capital
losses. Net income decreased for the six months ended June 30, 2009 due to an unfavorable first
quarter 2009 Unlock and lower fee income, partially offset by realized capital gains and a
favorable second quarter 2009 Unlock. For further discussion on the Unlocks, see the Critical
Accounting Estimates section of the MD&A. For further discussion of realized capital gains, see
Realized Capital Gains and Losses by Segment table under Lifes Operating Section of the MD&A. The
following other factors contributed to the changes in net income:
|
|
|
|
|
Fee income
|
|
|
|
Fee income decreased $30 and
$76, for the three and six months
ended June 30, 2009, respectively.
The decrease was driven by lower
variable annuity fee income due to a
decline in Japans variable annuity
account values. The decrease in
account values over the prior year
was attributed to market value
depreciation of $6.7 billion and net
outflows of $2.9 billion. Net
outflows were primarily driven by
the 3 Win trigger. Market
depreciation and net outflows were
partially offset by the
strengthening of the dollar which
caused an increase in account values
of $3 billion. |
|
|
|
|
|
Benefits, losses and loss adjustment
expenses
|
|
|
|
Benefits, losses and loss
adjustment expense decreased for the
three months ended June 30, 2009, as
a result of a favorable Unlock in
the second quarter of 2009,
partially offset by increased claim
costs. For the six months ended June
30, 2009, benefits, losses, and loss
adjustment expenses increased,
driven by an unfavorable Unlock in
the first quarter of 2009, a 3 Win
related charge of $39, after-tax,
and increased claim cost.
Unfavorable drivers were partially
offset by a favorable second quarter
Unlock. For further discussion on
the Unlocks, see the Critical
Accounting Estimates section of the
MD&A. |
89
|
|
|
|
|
Insurance operating costs and other
expenses
|
|
|
|
Insurance operating costs
and other expenses increased for the
three and six months ended June 30,
2009 due to investments in Other
International operations in the
first quarter 2009, as well as lower
capitalization of deferred policy
acquisition costs, as acquisition
costs exceeded pricing allowables. |
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of DAC
|
|
|
|
Amortization of DAC
decreased for the three months ended
June 30, 2009, as a result of a
favorable Unlock in the second
quarter of 2009. For the six months
ended June 30, 2009, amortization of
DAC increased, driven by an
unfavorable Unlock in the first
quarter of 2009 partially offset by
a favorable second quarter Unlock.
For further discussion on the
Unlocks, see the Critical Accounting
Estimates section of the MD&A. |
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax expense (benefit)
|
|
|
|
Income tax expense (benefit)
for the three and six months ended
June 30, 2009 is a function of
pre-tax income (loss) driven by the
drivers explained above. |
90
INSTITUTIONAL
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
Operating Summary |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
Change |
|
Fee income and other |
|
$ |
38 |
|
|
$ |
38 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
78 |
|
|
$ |
79 |
|
|
|
(1 |
%) |
Earned premiums |
|
|
74 |
|
|
|
242 |
|
|
|
(69 |
%) |
|
|
282 |
|
|
|
430 |
|
|
|
(34 |
%) |
Net investment income |
|
|
220 |
|
|
|
279 |
|
|
|
(21 |
%) |
|
|
414 |
|
|
|
573 |
|
|
|
(28 |
%) |
Net realized capital losses |
|
|
(95 |
) |
|
|
(87 |
) |
|
|
(9 |
%) |
|
|
(334 |
) |
|
|
(306 |
) |
|
|
(9 |
%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
|
237 |
|
|
|
472 |
|
|
|
(50 |
%) |
|
|
440 |
|
|
|
776 |
|
|
|
(43 |
%) |
Benefits, losses and loss adjustment expenses |
|
|
323 |
|
|
|
488 |
|
|
|
(34 |
%) |
|
|
770 |
|
|
|
946 |
|
|
|
(19 |
%) |
Insurance operating costs and other expenses |
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
(43 |
%) |
|
|
44 |
|
|
|
58 |
|
|
|
(24 |
%) |
Amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs
and present value of future profits |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
(60 |
%) |
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
(36 |
%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total benefits, losses and expenses |
|
|
342 |
|
|
|
523 |
|
|
|
(35 |
%) |
|
|
821 |
|
|
|
1,015 |
|
|
|
(19 |
%) |
Loss before income taxes |
|
|
(105 |
) |
|
|
(51 |
) |
|
|
(106 |
%) |
|
|
(381 |
) |
|
|
(239 |
) |
|
|
(59 |
%) |
Income tax benefit |
|
|
(39 |
) |
|
|
(21 |
) |
|
|
(86 |
%) |
|
|
(141 |
) |
|
|
(89 |
) |
|
|
(58 |
%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss |
|
$ |
(66 |
) |
|
$ |
(30 |
) |
|
|
(120 |
%) |
|
$ |
(240 |
) |
|
$ |
(150 |
) |
|
|
(60 |
%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets Under Management |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Institutional account values [1] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
23,928 |
|
|
$ |
25,546 |
|
|
|
(6 |
%) |
Private Placement Life Insurance account values [1] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32,594 |
|
|
|
32,944 |
|
|
|
(1 |
%) |
Mutual fund assets under management |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,654 |
|
|
|
3,844 |
|
|
|
(5 |
%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets under management |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
60,176 |
|
|
$ |
62,334 |
|
|
|
(3 |
%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1] |
|
Includes policyholder balances for investment contracts and reserves for future policy
benefits for insurance contracts. |
Three and six months ended June 30, 2009 compared to the three and six months ended June 30,
2008
Net loss in Institutional increased for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009, primarily due
to a decline in net investment spread and increased net realized capital losses. For further
discussion of net realized capital losses, see Realized Capital Gains and Losses by Segment table
under Lifes Operating Section of the MD&A. The following other factors contributed to changes in
net loss:
|
|
|
Earned premiums
|
|
Earned premiums decreased
for the three and six months ended
June 30, 2009 as ratings downgrades
reduced payout annuity sales. The
decrease in earned premiums was
offset by a corresponding decrease
in benefits, losses, and loss
adjustment expenses. |
|
|
|
Net investment income
|
|
Net investment income
declined for the three and six
months ended June 30, 2009, due to
decreased returns on limited
partnership and other alternative
investments of $(25) and $(67).
Additional decline is attributable
to lower yields on variable rate
securities due to declines in
short-term interest rates, and an
increased allocation to lower
yielding U.S. Treasuries and
short-term investments. The lower
yield on variable rate securities
was partially offset by a
corresponding decrease in interest
credited on liabilities reported in
benefits, losses, and loss
adjustment expenses. |
|
|
|
Insurance operating costs and other
expenses
|
|
Insurance operating costs
and other expenses decreased for the
three and six months ended June 30,
2009 due to active expense
management efforts and reduced
information technology expenses. |
|
|
|
Income tax benefit
|
|
The income tax benefit for
the three and six months ended June
30, 2009 increased compared to the
prior year primarily due to a
decline in income before taxes due
to a decline in net investment
spread and increased realized
capital losses. For further
discussion of net realized capital
losses, see Realized Capital Gains
and Losses by Segment table under
Lifes Operating section of the
MD&A. |
91
OTHER
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
Operating Summary |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
Change |
|
Fee income and other |
|
$ |
14 |
|
|
$ |
14 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
27 |
|
|
$ |
32 |
|
|
|
(16 |
%) |
Net investment income (loss): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities available-for sale and other |
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
(4 |
%) |
|
|
47 |
|
|
|
43 |
|
|
|
9 |
% |
Equity securities, trading [1] |
|
|
2,523 |
|
|
|
1,153 |
|
|
|
119 |
% |
|
|
1,799 |
|
|
|
(2,425 |
) |
|
|
NM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net investment income (loss) |
|
|
2,546 |
|
|
|
1,177 |
|
|
|
116 |
% |
|
|
1,846 |
|
|
|
(2,382 |
) |
|
|
NM |
|
Net realized capital gains (losses) |
|
|
(30 |
) |
|
|
8 |
|
|
NM |
|
|
|
(53 |
) |
|
|
(18 |
) |
|
|
(194 |
%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
|
2,530 |
|
|
|
1,199 |
|
|
|
111 |
% |
|
|
1,820 |
|
|
|
(2,368 |
) |
|
|
NM |
|
Benefits, losses and loss adjustment expenses |
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
(44 |
%) |
|
|
47 |
|
|
|
74 |
|
|
|
(36 |
%) |
Benefits, losses and loss adjustment
expenses returns credited on
International variable annuities [1] |
|
|
2,523 |
|
|
|
1,153 |
|
|
|
119 |
% |
|
|
1,799 |
|
|
|
(2,425 |
) |
|
|
NM |
|
Insurance operating costs and other expenses |
|
|
72 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
NM |
|
|
|
77 |
|
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
185 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total benefits, losses and expenses |
|
|
2,614 |
|
|
|
1,200 |
|
|
|
118 |
% |
|
|
1,923 |
|
|
|
(2,324 |
) |
|
|
NM |
|
Loss before income taxes |
|
|
(84 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
NM |
| |
|
(103 |
) |
|
|
(44 |
) |
|
|
(134 |
%) |
Income tax benefit |
|
|
(25 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(34 |
) |
|
|
(16 |
) |
|
|
(113 |
%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss |
|
$ |
(59 |
) |
|
$ |
(1 |
) |
|
|
NM |
| |
$ |
(69 |
) |
|
$ |
(28 |
) |
|
|
(146 |
%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1] |
|
Includes investment income and mark-to-market effects of equity securities, trading,
supporting the international variable annuity business, which are classified in net investment
income with corresponding amounts credited to policyholders within benefits, losses and loss
adjustment expenses. |
Three and six months ended June 30, 2009 compared to the three and six months ended June 30,
2008
|
|
|
Net investment income (loss)
|
|
Net investment income
(loss) on securities
available-for sale and other
increased for the six months
ended June 30, 2009 as compared
to the prior year period due to
declines in yields on fixed
maturity investments and
declines in limited partnerships
and other alternative investment
income offset by the effects of
inter-segment eliminations. |
|
|
|
Net realized capital gains (losses)
|
|
See Realized Capital
Gains and Losses by Segment
table under Lifes Operating
section of the MD&A. |
|
|
|
Benefits, losses and loss adjustment
expenses
|
|
Benefits, losses and
loss adjustment expenses
decreased for the three and six
months ended June 30, 2009 due
to inter-segment eliminations of
$19 and $30, respectively. |
|
|
|
Insurance operating costs and other
expenses
|
|
Insurance operating
costs and other expenses
increased for the three and six
months ended June 30, 2009 due
to restructuring costs that are
severance benefits and other
costs associated with the
suspension of sales in
Internationals Japan and
European operations. See Note
17 of Notes to Condensed
Consolidated Financial
Statements for further details
on the Companys restructuring,
severance and other costs. |
92
PROPERTY & CASUALTY
Executive Overview
Property & Casualty is organized into five reporting segments: the underwriting segments of
Personal Lines, Small Commercial, Middle Market and Specialty Commercial (collectively, Ongoing
Operations); and the Other Operations segment.
Property & Casualty provides a number of coverages, as well as insurance related services, to
businesses throughout the United States, including workers compensation, property, automobile,
liability, umbrella, specialty casualty, marine, livestock, fidelity, surety, professional
liability and directors and officers liability coverages. Property & Casualty also provides
automobile, homeowners and home-based business coverage to individuals throughout the United States
as well as insurance-related services to businesses.
Property & Casualty derives its revenues principally from premiums earned for insurance coverages
provided to insureds, investment income, and, to a lesser extent, from fees earned for services
provided to third parties and net realized capital gains and losses. Premiums charged for
insurance coverages are earned principally on a pro rata basis over the terms of the related
policies in-force.
Service fees principally include revenues from third party claims administration services provided
by Specialty Risk Services and revenues from member contact center services provided through the
AARP Health program.
Total Property & Casualty Financial Highlights
The following discusses Property & Casualty financial highlights for the three and six months ended
June 30, 2009 compared to the three and six months ended June 30, 2008.
Premium revenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Written Premiums [1] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Personal Lines |
|
$ |
1,045 |
|
|
$ |
1,029 |
|
|
$ |
1,989 |
|
|
$ |
1,965 |
|
Small Commercial |
|
|
643 |
|
|
|
679 |
|
|
|
1,336 |
|
|
|
1,422 |
|
Middle Market |
|
|
482 |
|
|
|
529 |
|
|
|
1,008 |
|
|
|
1,094 |
|
Specialty Commercial |
|
|
292 |
|
|
|
346 |
|
|
|
587 |
|
|
|
686 |
|
Other Operations |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
2,463 |
|
|
$ |
2,585 |
|
|
$ |
4,922 |
|
|
$ |
5,171 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earned Premiums [1] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Personal Lines |
|
$ |
985 |
|
|
$ |
980 |
|
|
$ |
1,964 |
|
|
$ |
1,963 |
|
Small Commercial |
|
|
643 |
|
|
|
683 |
|
|
|
1,295 |
|
|
|
1,370 |
|
Middle Market |
|
|
538 |
|
|
|
575 |
|
|
|
1,086 |
|
|
|
1,168 |
|
Specialty Commercial |
|
|
311 |
|
|
|
346 |
|
|
|
643 |
|
|
|
696 |
|
Other Operations |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
2,478 |
|
|
$ |
2,586 |
|
|
$ |
4,989 |
|
|
$ |
5,200 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1] |
|
The difference between written premiums and earned premiums is attributable to the change
in unearned premium reserve. |
93
Three and six months ended June 30, 2009 compared to the three and six months ended June 30,
2008
Earned Premiums
Total Property & Casualty earned premiums decreased by $108, or 4%, for the three month period and
by $211, or 4%, for the six month period, primarily due to lower earned premiums in Small
Commercial, Middle Market and Specialty Commercial.
|
|
|
Personal Lines
|
|
Earned premium increased
slightly to $985 for the three month
period and remained relatively flat
at $1,964 for the six month period.
For the three month period, an $18,
or 3%, increase in AARP earned
premiums was partially offset by a
$13, or 4% decrease in Agency and
Other earned premiums. For the six
month period a $34, or 2%, increase
in AARP earned premiums was offset
by a $33, or 6% decrease in Agency
and Other earned premiums. AARP
earned premiums grew primarily due
to an increase in earned pricing and
an increase in new business since
the fourth quarter of 2008,
partially offset by a decrease in
premium renewal retention over the
same period. Partially offsetting
the increase in earned premium was
the effect of a shift to more
preferred market segment business
(which lowers average premium) and
the effect of the economic downturn
causing consumers to take action to
lower their premiums. Agency earned
premium decreased by $12, or 4%, for
the three month period and by $28,
or 5%, for the six month period,
largely due to a decline in premium
renewal retention and a shift to
more preferred market segment
business (which lowers average
premium) and the effect of the
economic downturn causing consumers
to take actions to lower their
premiums. Partially offsetting the
factors decreasing earned premium
was an increase in earned pricing
and an increase in new business in
the first six months of 2009. |
|
|
|
Small Commercial
|
|
Earned premium decreased by
$40, or 6%, for the three month
period and by $75, or 5%, for the
six month period, primarily due to
lower earned audit premium on
workers compensation business and
the effect of non-renewals outpacing
new business over the last nine
months of 2008 and first three
months of 2009 in all lines,
including workers compensation,
package business and commercial
auto. While the Company has focused
on increasing new business from its
agents and expanding writings in
certain territories, the effects of
the economic downturn and competitor
actions to increase market share and
increase business appetite in
certain classes of risks have
contributed to the decrease in
earned premium in the first six
months of 2009. |
|
|
|
Middle Market
|
|
Earned premium decreased by
$37, or 6%, for the three month
period and by $82, or 7%, for the
six month period, primarily driven
by decreases in general liability
and commercial auto driven by earned
pricing decreases and the effect of
a decline in new business and
premium renewal retention over the
last nine months of 2008 and first
three months of 2009. Middle Market
workers compensation earned premium
increased modestly as the effect of
an increase in new business written
premium over the last nine months of
2008 and first three months of 2009
was partially offset by lower earned
audit premium. |
|
|
|
Specialty Commercial
|
|
Earned premium decreased by
$35, or 10%, for the three month
period and by $53, or 8%, for the
six month period, driven primarily
by a decrease in property business
due largely to the sale of the
Companys core excess and surplus
lines property business in the first
quarter of 2009. |
94
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Underwriting results before
catastrophes and prior accident years
development |
|
$ |
236 |
|
|
$ |
237 |
|
|
$ |
482 |
|
|
$ |
550 |
|
Current accident year catastrophes |
|
|
(142 |
) |
|
|
(171 |
) |
|
|
(207 |
) |
|
|
(221 |
) |
Prior accident years reserve development |
|
|
(62 |
) |
|
|
(16 |
) |
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Underwriting results |
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
281 |
|
|
|
349 |
|
Net servicing income [1] |
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
Net investment income |
|
|
280 |
|
|
|
391 |
|
|
|
505 |
|
|
|
756 |
|
Net realized capital losses |
|
|
(78 |
) |
|
|
(51 |
) |
|
|
(401 |
) |
|
|
(203 |
) |
Other expenses |
|
|
(50 |
) |
|
|
(65 |
) |
|
|
(99 |
) |
|
|
(124 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes |
|
|
191 |
|
|
|
333 |
|
|
|
301 |
|
|
|
785 |
|
Income tax expense |
|
|
(18 |
) |
|
|
(84 |
) |
|
|
(16 |
) |
|
|
(210 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
173 |
|
|
$ |
249 |
|
|
$ |
285 |
|
|
$ |
575 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1] |
|
Net of expenses related to service business. |
Three months ended June 30, 2009 compared to the three months ended June 30, 2008
Net income decreased by $76, or 31%, primarily driven by lower net investment income, higher net
realized capital losses and lower underwriting results.
|
|
|
Underwriting results
|
|
Underwriting results before
catastrophes and prior accident year
reserve development remained
relatively flat, as a 1.5 point
decrease in the current accident
year loss and loss adjustment
expense ratio before catastrophes
was offset by a 1.7 point increase
in the expense ratio and the effect
of a 4% decrease in earned premium.
The 1.5 point decrease in the
current accident year loss and loss
adjustment expense ratio before
catastrophes was principally driven
by lower non-catastrophe loss cost
severity on property business within
Middle Market and a lower loss and
loss adjustment expense ratio on
package business within Small
Commercial. The 1.7 point increase
in the expense ratio was primarily
due to the decrease in earned
premium, higher amortization of
Personal Lines acquisition costs,
increased IT costs and a $23
increase in taxes, licenses and fees
due to a $6 increase in the
assessment for a second injury fund
and $17 reserve strengthening for
other state funds and taxes. |
|
|
|
|
|
Current accident year
catastrophe losses decreased by $29
as losses from tornadoes and
thunderstorms in the South and
Midwest were lower in 2009 than in
2008. |
|
|
|
|
|
The $46 increase in net
unfavorable prior accident year
reserve development was largely due
to an increase in net unfavorable
reserve development in Other
Operations, partially offset by an
increase in net favorable reserve
development in Ongoing Operations.
The increase in net unfavorable
reserve development in Other
Operations was due to asbestos
reserve strengthening of $138 in the
second quarter of 2009 compared to
$50 of asbestos reserve
strengthening in the second quarter
of 2008. Net favorable reserve
development for Ongoing Operations
in 2009 was largely due to releases
of reserves for general liability
and professional liability claims.
See the Reserves Section of the MD&A
for further discussion. |
|
|
|
Income tax expense
|
|
Income taxes decreased by
$66 primarily due to a decrease in
pre-tax income and a $15 tax benefit
from the sale of an equity
investment in the second quarter of
2009. Apart from the $15 tax
benefit, the effective tax rate on
pre-tax income dropped from 25% in
2008 to 17% in 2009. Due primarily
to the larger amount of net realized
losses from investments in 2009, net
investment income generated from
tax-exempt securities represented a
greater share of pre-tax income in
2009 than in 2008. |
|
|
|
Net realized capital losses
|
|
For an explanation of the
increase in net realized capital
losses, see the Investment Results
Section of the MD&A. |
|
|
|
Net investment income
|
|
For an explanation of the
decrease in net investment income,
see the Investment Results Section
of the MD&A. |
95
Six months ended June 30, 2009 compared to the six months ended June 30, 2008
Net income decreased by $290, or 50%, primarily driven by lower net investment income, higher net
realized capital losses, and lower underwriting results.
|
|
|
Underwriting results
|
|
The $68, or 12%, decrease in
underwriting results before
catastrophes and prior accident
years reserve development was
primarily driven by a 4% decrease in
earned premium and a 1.5 point
increase in the expense ratio,
partially offset by a decrease in
the current accident year loss and
loss adjustment expense ratio before
catastrophes. The 1.5 point
increase in the expense ratio was
primarily due to the decrease in
earned premium, a higher amount of
amortization of Personal Lines
acquisition costs, increased IT
costs and a $23 increase in taxes,
licenses and fees due to a $6
increase in the assessment for a
second injury fund and $17 reserve
strengthening for other state funds
and taxes, partially offset a $14
reduction in The Texas Windstorm
Insurance Association (TWIA)
assessments related to hurricane Ike
in 2009. The 0.3 point decrease in
the current accident year loss and
loss adjustment expense ratio before
catastrophes was principally driven
by a lower loss and loss adjustment
expense ratio on workers
compensation business in Small
Commercial and, to a lesser extent,
lower non-catastrophe property
losses within Middle Market and
favorable frequency on AARP auto
liability claims, partially offset
by the effects of increased loss
cost severity and lower average
premium for homeowners. |
|
|
|
|
|
Current accident year
catastrophe losses decreased by $14
as losses from winter storms,
tornadoes and thunderstorms were
lower in 2009 than in 2008. |
|
|
|
|
|
The $14 decrease in net
favorable prior accident year
reserve development was largely due
to an increase in net unfavorable
reserve development in Other
Operations, partially offset by an
increase in net favorable reserve
development in Ongoing Operations.
The increase in net unfavorable
reserve development in Other
Operations was due to asbestos
reserve strengthening of $138 in the
second quarter of 2009 compared to
$50 of asbestos reserve
strengthening in the second quarter
of 2008. Net favorable reserve
development for Ongoing Operations
in 2009 was largely due to releases
of reserves for general liability,
professional liability and personal
auto liability claims, partially
offset by strengthening of reserves
for Small Commercial package
business. See the Reserves Section
of the MD&A for further discussion. |
|
|
|
Income tax expense
|
|
Income tax expense decreased
from $210 in 2008 to $16 in 2009,
primarily due to a decrease in
pre-tax income, a $17 benefit from a
tax true-up recognized in the first
quarter of 2009 and a $15 tax
benefit from the sale of an equity
investment in the second quarter of
2009. Apart from the tax true-up
and tax benefit, the effective tax
rate on pre-tax income dropped from
27% in 2008 to 16% in 2009. Due
primarily to the larger amount of
net realized losses from investments
in 2009, net investment income
generated from tax-exempt securities
represented a greater share of
pre-tax income in 2009 than in 2008. |
|
|
|
Net realized capital losses
|
|
For an explanation of the
increase in net realized capital
losses see the Investment Results
Section of the MD&A. |
|
|
|
Net investment income
|
|
For an explanation of the
decrease in net investment income
see the Investment Results Section
of the MD&A. |
96
Investment Results
The following table below summarizes Property & Casualtys net investment income.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
(Before-tax) |
|
Amount |
|
|
Yield [1] |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Yield [1] |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Yield [1] |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Yield [1] |
|
Fixed maturities [2] |
|
$ |
306 |
|
|
|
5.1 |
% |
|
$ |
357 |
|
|
|
5.4 |
% |
|
$ |
610 |
|
|
|
5.1 |
% |
|
$ |
728 |
|
|
|
5.4 |
% |
Equity securities, AFS |
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
7.4 |
% |
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
5.8 |
% |
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
8.0 |
% |
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
6.3 |
% |
Mortgage loans |
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
4.8 |
% |
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
5.1 |
% |
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
4.7 |
% |
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
5.5 |
% |
Limited partnerships
and other alternative
investments |
|
|
(42 |
) |
|
|
(15.4 |
%) |
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
4.8 |
% |
|
|
(136 |
) |
|
|
(23.9 |
%) |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
(0.5 |
%) |
Other [3] |
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Investment expense |
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(13 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net investment
income, before-tax |
|
|
280 |
|
|
|
4.2 |
% |
|
|
391 |
|
|
|
5.3 |
% |
|
|
505 |
|
|
|
3.8 |
% |
|
|
756 |
|
|
|
5.1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net investment income,
after-tax [4] |
|
$ |
216 |
|
|
|
3.3 |
% |
|
$ |
290 |
|
|
|
3.9 |
% |
|
$ |
392 |
|
|
|
3.0 |
% |
|
$ |
562 |
|
|
|
3.8 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1] |
|
Yields calculated using investment income before investment expenses divided by the monthly weighted average invested
assets at cost, amortized cost, or adjusted carrying value, as applicable, excluding collateral received associated
with the securities lending program. Included in the fixed maturity yield is other, which primarily relates to fixed
maturities (see footnote [3] below). Included in the total net investment income yield is investment expense. |
|
[2] |
|
Includes net investment income on short-term bonds. |
|
[3] |
|
Includes income from derivatives that qualify for hedge accounting under SFAS 133. These derivatives hedge fixed
maturities. Also includes fees associated with securities lending activities of $0 and ($1), for the three and six
months ended June 30, 2009, respectively, and ($9) and ($18) for the three and six months ended June 30, 2008,
respectively. The income from securities lending activities is included within fixed maturities. |
|
[4] |
|
Due to significant holdings in tax-exempt investments, after-tax net investment income and yield are also included. |
Three and six months ended June 30, 2009 compared to the three and six months ended June 30,
2008
Before-tax net investment income decreased $111, or 28%, and $251, or 33%, and after-tax net
investment income decreased $74, or 26%, and $170, or 30%, for the three and six months ended June
30, 2009, respectively, compared to the prior year periods primarily due to lower income on limited
partnerships and other alternative investments and fixed maturities. The decline in limited
partnerships and other alternative investments income was primarily due to negative re-valuations
of the underlying investments associated primarily with the real estate and private equity markets.
The decline in fixed maturity income was primarily due to lower yield on variable rate securities
due to declines in short-term interest rates and increased allocation to securities with greater
market liquidity but lower yield such as U.S. Treasuries in an effort to retain liquidity. Based
upon the current interest rate and credit environment, Property & Casualty expects a lower average
portfolio yield for 2009 as compared to 2008, including a negative yield on limited partnerships
and other alternative investments.
97
The primary investment objective for Property & Casualtys Ongoing Operations segment is to
maximize economic value while generating sufficient after-tax income to meet policyholder and
corporate obligations. For Property & Casualtys Other Operations segment, the investment
objective is to ensure the full and timely payment of all liabilities. Property & Casualtys
investment strategies are developed based on a variety of factors including business needs,
regulatory requirements and tax considerations.
The following table presents Property & Casualtys invested assets by type.
Composition
of Invested Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2009 |
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Percent |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Percent |
|
Fixed maturities, AFS, at fair value |
|
$ |
20,773 |
|
|
|
84.3 |
% |
|
$ |
19,775 |
|
|
|
81.7 |
% |
Equity securities, AFS, at fair value |
|
|
586 |
|
|
|
2.4 |
% |
|
|
674 |
|
|
|
2.8 |
% |
Mortgage loans on real estate [1] |
|
|
731 |
|
|
|
3.0 |
% |
|
|
785 |
|
|
|
3.2 |
% |
Limited partnerships and other alternative investments |
|
|
963 |
|
|
|
3.9 |
% |
|
|
1,166 |
|
|
|
4.8 |
% |
Other investments [2] |
|
|
114 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
% |
|
|
207 |
|
|
|
0.9 |
% |
Short-term investments |
|
|
1,459 |
|
|
|
5.9 |
% |
|
|
1,597 |
|
|
|
6.6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total investments |
|
$ |
24,626 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
$ |
24,204 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1] |
|
Consist of commercial and agricultural loans. |
|
[2] |
|
Primarily relates to derivative instruments. |
Total investments increased $422 since December 31, 2008, primarily due to improved security
valuations due to credit spread tightening, partially offset by rising interest rates. Offsetting
the increase in fixed maturities were declines in limited partnerships and other alternative
investments due to hedge fund redemptions and negative re-valuations of the underlying investments
associated primarily with real estate and private equity markets.
The following table summarizes Property & Casualtys net realized capital gains and losses.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Gross gains on sale |
|
$ |
74 |
|
|
$ |
31 |
|
|
$ |
145 |
|
|
$ |
83 |
|
Gross losses on sale |
|
|
(40 |
) |
|
|
(13 |
) |
|
|
(370 |
) |
|
|
(113 |
) |
Net impairment losses |
|
|
(48 |
) |
|
|
(40 |
) |
|
|
(84 |
) |
|
|
(113 |
) |
Periodic net coupon settlements on credit derivatives |
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
3 |
|
Other, net |
|
|
(60 |
) |
|
|
(30 |
) |
|
|
(85 |
) |
|
|
(63 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net realized capital losses, before-tax |
|
$ |
(78 |
) |
|
$ |
(51 |
) |
|
$ |
(401 |
) |
|
$ |
(203 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The circumstances giving rise to the net realized capital gains and losses in these components are
as follows:
|
|
|
Gross gains and losses on sale
|
|
Gains and losses on sale for
the three months ended June 30, 2009
were primarily comprised of
municipal securities. Gains and
losses on sale for the six months
ended June 30, 2009 were primarily
within lower quality securities,
mainly financial services and CMBS,
resulting primarily from an effort
to reduce portfolio risk while
simultaneously reallocating the
portfolio to securities with more
favorable risk/return profiles. |
|
|
|
|
|
Gross gains on sales for the
three and six months ended June 30,
2008 were predominantly within fixed
maturities and were comprised of
corporate and municipal securities.
Gross losses on sales for the three
and six months ended June 30, 2008,
were primarily comprised of
corporate securities and CMBS, as
well as $19 of CLOs. Gross gains
and losses on sale, excluding the
loss on CLOs, primarily resulted
from the decision to reallocate the
portfolio to securities with more
favorable risk/return profiles. |
|
|
|
Net impairment losses
|
|
For further information, see
Other-Than-Temporary Impairment
Losses within the Investment Credit
Risk Section of the MD&A. |
|
|
|
Other, net
|
|
Other, net losses for the
three and six months ended June 30,
2009 primarily resulted from net
losses on credit derivatives used to
economically hedge fixed maturities
driven by credit spread tightening
and valuation allowances on impaired
mortgage loans of $25 and $52,
respectively. These losses were
partially offset by a gain on the
sale of First State Management Group
(FSMG). For more information
regarding the sale of FSMG, refer to
Note 15 of the Notes to the
Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements. |
|
|
|
|
|
Other, net losses for the
three and six months ended June 30,
2008 were primarily related to net
losses on credit derivatives of $24
and $76, respectively. The net
losses on credit derivatives in the
first quarter were due to
significant credit spreads widening
on credit derivatives that assume
credit exposure. The net losses on
credit derivatives in the second
quarter were due to credit spreads
tightening significantly on credit
derivatives that reduce credit
exposure on certain referenced
corporate entities. Included in the
six months ended June 30, 2008 were
losses incurred on HIMCO managed
CLOs. |
98
Key Performance Ratios and Measures
The Company considers several measures and ratios to be the key performance indicators for the
property and casualty underwriting businesses. For a detailed discussion of the Companys key
performance and profitability ratios and measures, see the Property & Casualty Executive Overview
section of the MD&A included in The Hartfords 2008 Form 10-K Annual Report. The following table
and the segment discussions include the more significant ratios and measures of profitability for
the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008. Management believes that these ratios and
measures are useful in understanding the underlying trends in The Hartfords property and casualty
insurance underwriting business. However, these key performance indicators should only be used in
conjunction with, and not in lieu of, underwriting income for the underwriting segments of Personal
Lines, Small Commercial, Middle Market and Specialty Commercial and net income for the Property &
Casualty business as a whole, Ongoing Operations and Other Operations. These ratios and measures
may not be comparable to other performance measures used by the Companys competitors.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Ongoing Operations earned premium growth |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Personal Lines |
|
|
1 |
% |
|
|
1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
% |
Small Commercial |
|
|
(6 |
%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5 |
%) |
|
|
|
|
Middle Market |
|
|
(6 |
%) |
|
|
(6 |
%) |
|
|
(7 |
%) |
|
|
(5 |
%) |
Specialty Commercial |
|
|
(10 |
%) |
|
|
(4 |
%) |
|
|
(8 |
%) |
|
|
(4 |
%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Ongoing Operations |
|
|
(4 |
%) |
|
|
(1 |
%) |
|
|
(4 |
%) |
|
|
(1 |
%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ongoing Operations combined ratio |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Combined ratio before catastrophes and prior year development |
|
|
90.4 |
|
|
|
90.7 |
|
|
|
90.2 |
|
|
|
89.3 |
|
Catastrophe ratio |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current year |
|
|
5.8 |
|
|
|
6.6 |
|
|
|
4.2 |
|
|
|
4.2 |
|
Prior years |
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total catastrophe ratio |
|
|
5.6 |
|
|
|
6.6 |
|
|
|
4.2 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
Non-catastrophe prior year development |
|
|
(2.3 |
) |
|
|
(1.5 |
) |
|
|
(2.6 |
) |
|
|
(1.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Combined ratio |
|
|
93.7 |
|
|
|
95.8 |
|
|
|
91.8 |
|
|
|
91.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Operations net income (loss) |
|
$ |
(49 |
) |
|
$ |
3 |
|
|
$ |
(48 |
) |
|
$ |
17 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three and six months ended June 30, 2009 compared to the three and six months ended June 30, 2008
Ongoing Operations earned premium growth
|
|
|
Personal Lines
|
|
The earned premium growth
rate was 1% in the three month
period of each year and declined for
the six month period from 2% growth
in 2008 to no growth in 2009. The
change to no growth for the six
month period was primarily due to a
lower earned premium growth rate on
AARP business driven by a decrease
in new business and premium renewal
retention in 2008 as compared to
2007. |
|
|
|
Small Commercial
|
|
The change from no earned
premium growth in the three and six
month periods of 2008 to a 6% and 5%
earned premium decline for
comparable periods in 2009,
respectively, was primarily
attributable to decreasing premium
renewal retention over the last nine
months of 2008 and first three
months of 2009. |
|
|
|
Middle Market
|
|
While earned premium
declined at 6% in the three month
period of each year, there was a
larger earned premium decline in the
six months ended June 30, 2009
compared to the six month period in
2008. The larger earned premium
decline in 2009 was primarily due to
a decrease in premium renewal
retention beginning in the fourth
quarter of 2008, partially offset by
a change to new business growth
since the second quarter of 2008. |
|
|
|
Specialty Commercial
|
|
For both the three and six
month periods, earned premium
declined by a higher rate in 2009
than in 2008, primarily driven by a
larger decrease in property earned
premium. Effective March 31, 2009,
the Company sold its core excess and
surplus lines property business to
Beazley Group PLC. |
99
Ongoing Operations combined ratio
For the three months ended June 30, 2009, the Ongoing Operations combined ratio decreased 2.1
points, to 93.7, due primarily to a 0.8 point decrease in current accident year catastrophes and a
0.8 point increase in net favorable non-catastrophe prior year reserve development. For the six
months ended June 30, 2009, the Ongoing Operations combined ratio remained flat at 91.8, primarily
due to a 1.1 point increase in net favorable non-catastrophe prior accident year reserve
development offset by a 0.9 point increase in the combined ratio before catastrophes and prior
accident year development.
|
|
|
Combined ratio before catastrophes
and prior accident years development
|
|
For the three month period,
the 0.3 decrease in the combined
ratio before catastrophes and prior
accident year development, from 90.7
to 90.4, was due to a 1.5 point
decrease in the current accident
year loss and loss adjustment
expense ratio before catastrophes
and a 0.6 point decrease in the
policyholder dividend ratio,
partially offset by a 1.7 point
increase in the expense ratio. For
the six month period, the 0.9 point
increase in the combined ratio
before catastrophes and prior
accident year development, from 89.3
to 90.2, was due primarily to a 1.5
point increase in the expense ratio. |
|
|
|
|
|
The current loss and loss
adjustment expense ratio before
catastrophes decreased by 1.5 points
in the three month period and by 0.3
points in the six month period.
Among other factors, the improvement
was driven by lower non-catastrophe
property losses within Middle
Market, favorable frequency on AARP
auto liability claims and a lower
loss and loss adjustment expense
ratio on package business within
Small Commercial, partially offset
by the effects of increased loss
cost severity and lower average
premium for homeowners. |
|
|
|
|
|
The increase in the expense
ratio for both the three and
six-month periods includes the
effects of the decrease in earned
premium, higher amortization of
Personal Lines acquisition costs,
increased IT costs and a $23
increase in taxes, licenses and fees
due to a $6 increase in the
assessment for a second injury fund
and $17 reserve strengthening for
other state funds and taxes. For
the six month period, the increase
in the expense ratio is partially
offset by a $14 reduction in TWIA
assessments related to hurricane
Ike. |
|
|
|
Catastrophes
|
|
The catastrophe ratio
decreased 1.0 point, to 5.6, for the
three month period and increased 0.2
points, to 4.2, for the six month
period. The decrease in the
catastrophe ratio for the three
month period was due to a decrease
in current accident year
catastrophes driven by a decrease in
losses from tornadoes and
thunderstorms in the South and
Midwest. For the six month period,
the increase in the catastrophe
ratio was due to a change from net
favorable prior accident year
catastrophe reserve development in
2008 to no net prior accident year
catastrophe reserve development in
2009. |
|
|
|
Non-catastrophe prior accident years
development
|
|
Net non-catastrophe prior
accident year reserve development
was favorable in both 2009 and 2008.
Favorable reserve development for
the three and six-month periods in
2009 included, among other reserve
changes, the release of reserves for
general liability claims, primarily
related to accident years 2004 to
2007, the release of reserves for
directors and officers claims for
accident years 2003 to 2007 and the
release of reserves for personal
auto liability claims, primarily
related to accident years 2005 to
2007, partially offset by
strengthening of reserves for Small
Commercial package business. See
the Reserves Section of the MD&A for
a discussion of prior accident year
reserve development for Ongoing
Operations in 2009. |
Other Operations net income (loss)
|
|
Other Operations reported a net loss of $49 in the three months ended June 30, 2009
compared to net income of $3 for the comparable period in 2008 and a net loss of $48 in the
six months ended June 30, 2009 compared to net income of $17 for the comparable period in
2008. The change from net income to a net loss in both the three and six month periods was
primarily due to an increase in net unfavorable prior accident years reserve development for
asbestos reserves and a decrease in net investment income, partially offset by a decrease of
$20 in the allowance for uncollectible reinsurance as a result of the Companys annual
evaluation of reinsurance recoverables. The three and six months ended June 30, 2009 included
$138 of asbestos reserve strengthening as a result of the Companys annual asbestos
evaluation. In comparison, the three and six months ended June 30, 2008 included $50 of
asbestos reserve strengthening. See the Other Operations segment MD&A for further discussion. |
100
Reserves
Reserving for property and casualty losses is an estimation process. As additional experience and
other relevant claim data become available, reserve levels are adjusted accordingly. Such
adjustments of reserves related to claims incurred in prior years are a natural occurrence in the
loss reserving process and are referred to as reserve development. Reserve development that
increases previous estimates of ultimate cost is called reserve strengthening. Reserve
development that decreases previous estimates of ultimate cost is called reserve releases.
Reserve development can influence the comparability of year over year underwriting results and is
set forth in the paragraphs and tables that follow. The prior accident years development (pts)
in the following table represents the ratio of reserve development to earned premiums. For a
detailed discussion of the Companys reserve policies, see Notes 1, 11 and 12 of Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements and the Critical Accounting Estimates section of the MD&A
included in The Hartfords 2008 Form 10-K Annual Report.
Based on the results of the quarterly reserve review process, the Company determines the
appropriate reserve adjustments, if any, to record. Recorded reserve estimates are changed after
consideration of numerous factors, including but not limited to, the magnitude of the difference
between the actuarial indication and the recorded reserves, improvement or deterioration of
actuarial indications in the period, the maturity of the accident year, trends observed over the
recent past and the level of volatility within a particular line of business. In general, changes
are made more quickly to more mature accident years and less volatile lines of business. For
information regarding reserving for asbestos and environmental claims within Other Operations,
refer to the Other Operations segment discussion.
As part of its quarterly reserve review process, the Company is closely monitoring reported loss
development in certain lines where the recent emergence of paid losses and case reserves could
indicate a trend that may eventually lead the Company to change its estimate of ultimate losses in
those lines. If, and when, the emergence of reported losses is determined to be a trend that
changes the Companys estimate of ultimate losses, prior accident years reserves would be adjusted
in the period the change in estimate is made.
While the Company expects its losses from the sub-prime mortgage and credit crisis, as well as its
exposure to the Madoff and Stanford cases to be manageable, there is nonetheless the risk that
claims under directors and officers (D&O) and errors and omissions (E&O) insurance policies
incurred in the 2007 and 2008 accident years may develop adversely as the claims are settled.
However, so far, the Company has seen no evidence of adverse loss experience related to these
events. In fact, reported losses to date for claims under D&O and E&O policies for the 2007
accident year have been emerging favorably to initial expectations. In addition, for the 2003 to
2006 accident years, reported losses for claims under D&O and E&O policies have been emerging
favorably to initial expectations due to lower than expected claim severity. The Company released
a total of $50 of reserves for D&O and E&O claims in the first six months of 2009 related to the
2003 to 2007 accident years. Any continued favorable emergence of claims under D&O and E&O
insurance policies for the 2007 and prior accident years could lead the Company to reduce reserves
for these liabilities in future quarters.
During the first and second quarters of 2009, the Company increased its estimate of unreported
claims related to customs bonds. Because the pattern of claim reporting for customs bonds has not
been similar to the reporting pattern of other surety bonds, future claim activity is difficult to
predict. It is possible that as additional claim activity emerges, our estimate of both the number
of future claims and the cost of those claims could change substantially.
The Company expects to perform its regular review of environmental liabilities in the third quarter
of 2009. Consistent with the Companys long-standing reserve practices, the Company will continue
to review and monitor its reserves in the Other Operations segment regularly, and where future
developments indicate, make appropriate adjustments to the reserves.
101
A roll-forward follows of Property & Casualty liabilities for unpaid losses and loss adjustment
expenses by segment for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, 2009 |
|
|
|
Personal |
|
|
Small |
|
|
Middle |
|
|
Specialty |
|
|
Ongoing |
|
|
Other |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
Lines |
|
|
Commercial |
|
|
Market |
|
|
Commercial |
|
|
Operations |
|
|
Operations |
|
|
P&C |
|
Beginning liabilities for unpaid
losses and loss adjustment
expenses-gross |
|
$ |
2,024 |
|
|
$ |
3,590 |
|
|
$ |
4,739 |
|
|
$ |
6,987 |
|
|
$ |
17,340 |
|
|
$ |
4,464 |
|
|
$ |
21,804 |
|
Reinsurance and other recoverables |
|
|
58 |
|
|
|
170 |
|
|
|
458 |
|
|
|
2,063 |
|
|
|
2,749 |
|
|
|
793 |
|
|
|
3,542 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning liabilities for unpaid
losses and loss adjustment
expenses-net |
|
|
1,966 |
|
|
|
3,420 |
|
|
|
4,281 |
|
|
|
4,924 |
|
|
|
14,591 |
|
|
|
3,671 |
|
|
|
18,262 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for unpaid losses and loss
adjustment expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current accident year before
catastrophes |
|
|
649 |
|
|
|
340 |
|
|
|
331 |
|
|
|
214 |
|
|
|
1,534 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,534 |
|
Current accident year catastrophes |
|
|
110 |
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
142 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
142 |
|
Prior accident years |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
(22 |
) |
|
|
(47 |
) |
|
|
(59 |
) |
|
|
121 |
|
|
|
62 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total provision for unpaid losses and
loss adjustment expenses |
|
|
759 |
|
|
|
373 |
|
|
|
317 |
|
|
|
168 |
|
|
|
1,617 |
|
|
|
121 |
|
|
|
1,738 |
|
Payments |
|
|
(702 |
) |
|
|
(335 |
) |
|
|
(341 |
) |
|
|
(154 |
) |
|
|
(1,532 |
) |
|
|
(71 |
) |
|
|
(1,603 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending liabilities for unpaid losses
and loss adjustment expenses-net |
|
|
2,023 |
|
|
|
3,458 |
|
|
|
4,257 |
|
|
|
4,938 |
|
|
|
14,676 |
|
|
|
3,721 |
|
|
|
18,397 |
|
Reinsurance and other recoverables |
|
|
54 |
|
|
|
168 |
|
|
|
447 |
|
|
|
2,001 |
|
|
|
2,670 |
|
|
|
835 |
|
|
|
3,505 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending liabilities for unpaid losses
and loss adjustment expenses-gross |
|
$ |
2,077 |
|
|
$ |
3,626 |
|
|
$ |
4,704 |
|
|
$ |
6,939 |
|
|
$ |
17,346 |
|
|
$ |
4,556 |
|
|
$ |
21,902 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earned premiums |
|
$ |
985 |
|
|
$ |
643 |
|
|
$ |
538 |
|
|
$ |
311 |
|
|
$ |
2,477 |
|
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
$ |
2,478 |
|
Loss and loss expense paid ratio [1] |
|
|
71.2 |
|
|
|
52.1 |
|
|
|
63.6 |
|
|
|
49.9 |
|
|
|
61.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss and loss expense incurred ratio |
|
|
77.0 |
|
|
|
58.0 |
|
|
|
59.1 |
|
|
|
54.0 |
|
|
|
65.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prior accident years development (pts)
[2] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.5 |
|
|
|
(4.2 |
) |
|
|
(15.0 |
) |
|
|
(2.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1] |
|
The loss and loss expense paid ratio represents the ratio of paid losses and loss adjustment expenses to earned premiums. |
|
[2] |
|
Prior accident years development (pts) represents the ratio of prior accident years development to earned premiums. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, 2009 |
|
|
|
Personal |
|
|
Small |
|
|
Middle |
|
|
Specialty |
|
|
Ongoing |
|
|
Other |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
Lines |
|
|
Commercial |
|
|
Market |
|
|
Commercial |
|
|
Operations |
|
|
Operations |
|
|
P&C |
|
Beginning liabilities for unpaid
losses and loss adjustment
expenses-gross |
|
$ |
2,052 |
|
|
$ |
3,572 |
|
|
$ |
4,744 |
|
|
$ |
6,981 |
|
|
$ |
17,349 |
|
|
$ |
4,584 |
|
|
$ |
21,933 |
|
Reinsurance and other recoverables |
|
|
60 |
|
|
|
176 |
|
|
|
437 |
|
|
|
2,110 |
|
|
|
2,783 |
|
|
|
803 |
|
|
|
3,586 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning liabilities for unpaid
losses and loss adjustment
expenses-net |
|
|
1,992 |
|
|
|
3,396 |
|
|
|
4,307 |
|
|
|
4,871 |
|
|
|
14,566 |
|
|
|
3,781 |
|
|
|
18,347 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for unpaid losses and loss
adjustment expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current accident year before
catastrophes |
|
|
1,276 |
|
|
|
702 |
|
|
|
690 |
|
|
|
447 |
|
|
|
3,115 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,115 |
|
Current accident year catastrophes |
|
|
152 |
|
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
207 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
207 |
|
Prior accident years |
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
(80 |
) |
|
|
(72 |
) |
|
|
(127 |
) |
|
|
121 |
|
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total provision for unpaid losses and
loss adjustment expenses |
|
|
1,438 |
|
|
|
746 |
|
|
|
634 |
|
|
|
377 |
|
|
|
3,195 |
|
|
|
121 |
|
|
|
3,316 |
|
Payments |
|
|
(1,407 |
) |
|
|
(684 |
) |
|
|
(684 |
) |
|
|
(310 |
) |
|
|
(3,085 |
) |
|
|
(181 |
) |
|
|
(3,266 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending liabilities for unpaid losses
and loss adjustment expenses-net |
|
|
2,023 |
|
|
|
3,458 |
|
|
|
4,257 |
|
|
|
4,938 |
|
|
|
14,676 |
|
|
|
3,721 |
|
|
|
18,397 |
|
Reinsurance and other recoverables |
|
|
54 |
|
|
|
168 |
|
|
|
447 |
|
|
|
2,001 |
|
|
|
2,670 |
|
|
|
835 |
|
|
|
3,505 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending liabilities for unpaid
losses and loss adjustment expenses-gross |
|
$ |
2,077 |
|
|
$ |
3,626 |
|
|
$ |
4,704 |
|
|
$ |
6,939 |
|
|
$ |
17,346 |
|
|
$ |
4,556 |
|
|
$ |
21,902 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earned premiums |
|
$ |
1,964 |
|
|
$ |
1,295 |
|
|
$ |
1,086 |
|
|
$ |
643 |
|
|
$ |
4,988 |
|
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
$ |
4,989 |
|
Loss and loss expense paid ratio [1] |
|
|
71.7 |
|
|
|
52.8 |
|
|
|
63.1 |
|
|
|
48.0 |
|
|
|
61.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss and loss expense incurred ratio |
|
|
73.2 |
|
|
|
57.6 |
|
|
|
58.4 |
|
|
|
58.4 |
|
|
|
64.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prior accident years development (pts)
[2] |
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
1.2 |
|
|
|
(7.4 |
) |
|
|
(11.3 |
) |
|
|
(2.6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1] |
|
The loss and loss expense paid ratio represents the ratio of paid losses and loss adjustment expenses to earned premiums. |
|
[2] |
|
Prior accident years development (pts) represents the ratio of prior accident years development to earned premiums. |
102
Prior accident years development recorded in 2009
Included within prior accident years development for the six months ended June 30, 2009 were the
following reserve strengthenings (releases):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Personal |
|
|
Small |
|
|
Middle |
|
|
Specialty |
|
|
Ongoing |
|
|
Other |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
Lines |
|
|
Commercial |
|
|
Market |
|
|
Commercial |
|
|
Operations |
|
|
Operations |
|
|
P&C |
|
Released general liability
reserves primarily for accident
years 2004 to 2007 |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(33 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(33 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(33 |
) |
Released reserves for directors
and officers claims primarily
related to accident years 2003 to
2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(30 |
) |
|
|
(30 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(30 |
) |
Released reserves for personal
auto liability claims primarily
related to accident years 2005 to
2007 |
|
|
(15 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15 |
) |
Strengthened reserves for package
business liability claims
primarily related to accident
years 2007 and 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20 |
|
Strengthened reserves for surety
business primarily related to
accident years 2004 to 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15 |
|
Strengthening of net asbestos
reserves |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
138 |
|
|
|
138 |
|
Released reserves for
uncollectible reinsurance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(20 |
) |
|
|
(20 |
) |
|
|
(20 |
) |
|
|
(40 |
) |
Other reserve re-estimates, net [1] |
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
(12 |
) |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total prior accident years
development for the three months
ended June 30, 2009 |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
10 |
|
|
$ |
(22 |
) |
|
$ |
(47 |
) |
|
$ |
(59 |
) |
|
$ |
121 |
|
|
$ |
62 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Released general liability
reserves primarily for accident
years 2005 to 2007 |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(38 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(38 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(38 |
) |
Released workers compensation
reserves, primarily related to
accident years 2003 to 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(13 |
) |
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(23 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(23 |
) |
Released reserves for directors
and officers claims for accident
year 2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(20 |
) |
|
|
(20 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(20 |
) |
Released reserves for personal
auto liability claims primarily
related to accident years 2005 to
2007 |
|
|
(18 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(18 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(18 |
) |
Strengthened reserves for
homeowners claims primarily
related to accident years 2000 to
2008 |
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18 |
|
Strengthened reserves for package
business liability claims for
accident years 2000 to 2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16 |
|
Strengthened reserves for surety
business primarily related to
accident years 2004 to 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10 |
|
Other reserve re-estimates, net [2] |
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
(15 |
) |
|
|
(13 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(13 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total prior accident years
development for the three months
ended March 31, 2009 |
|
$ |
10 |
|
|
$ |
5 |
|
|
$ |
(58 |
) |
|
$ |
(25 |
) |
|
$ |
(68 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(68 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total prior accident years
development for the six months
ended June 30, 2009 |
|
$ |
10 |
|
|
$ |
15 |
|
|
$ |
(80 |
) |
|
$ |
(72 |
) |
|
$ |
(127 |
) |
|
$ |
121 |
|
|
$ |
(6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1] |
|
Includes reserve discount accretion of $6, including $2 in Small Commercial, $2 in Middle Market and $2 in Specialty Commercial. |
|
[2] |
|
Includes reserve discount accretion of $6, including $2 in Small Commercial, $2 in Middle Market and $2 in Specialty Commercial. |
103
During the three and six months ended June 30, 2009, the Companys re-estimates of prior
accident years reserves included the following significant reserve changes:
Ongoing Operations
|
|
Released reserves for general liability claims by $38 in the first quarter of 2009 and by
$33 in the second quarter of 2009. Beginning in the third quarter of 2007, the Company
observed that reported losses for high hazard and umbrella general liability claims, primarily
related to the 2001 to 2006 accident years, were emerging favorably and this caused management
to reduce its estimate of the cost of future reported claims for these accident years,
resulting in a reserve release in each quarter since the third quarter of 2007. During the
first and second quarters of 2009, management determined that the lower level of loss
emergence was also evident in accident year 2007 and had continued for accident years 2004 to
2006 and, as a result, the Company reduced the reserves. |
|
|
Released reserves for professional liability claims by $20 in the first quarter of 2009
related to accident year 2006 and by $30 in the second quarter of 2009 related to accident
years 2003 to 2007. Beginning in 2008, the Company observed that claim severity for both D&O
and E&O claims for the 2003 to 2006 accident years was developing favorably to previous
expectations and the Company released reserves for these accident years in 2008. During the
first and second quarters of 2009, the Companys updated analysis showed that claim severity
for directors and officers losses in the 2003 to 2007 accident years continued to develop
favorably to previous expectations, resulting in a $20 reduction of reserves in the first
quarter and a $30 reduction of reserves in the second quarter. |
|
|
Released reserves for Personal Lines auto liability claims by $18 and $15, for the first
and second quarters of 2009, respectively, principally related to AARP business for the 2005
through 2007 accident years. Beginning in the first quarter of 2008, management observed an
improvement in emerged claim severity for the 2005 through 2007 accident years attributed, in
part, to changes made in claim handling procedures in 2007. In the first and second quarters
of 2009, the Company recognized that favorable development in reported severity was a
sustained trend and, accordingly, management reduced its reserve estimate in each quarter. |
|
|
Released workers compensation reserves related to allocated loss adjustment expense
reserves in accident years 2003 to 2007 by $23 in the first quarter of 2009. During the first
quarter of 2009, the Company observed lower than expected expense payments on older accident
years. As a result, the Company reduced its estimate for future expense payments on more
recent accident years. |
|
|
The Company reviewed its allowance for uncollectible reinsurance for Ongoing Operations in
the second quarter of 2009 and reduced its allowance for Ongoing Operations by $20 driven, in
part, by a reduction in gross ceded loss recoverables. The allowance for uncollectible
reinsurance for Ongoing Operations is recorded within the Specialty Commercial segment. |
|
|
Strengthened reserves for liability claims under Small Commercial package policies by $16
in the first quarter of 2009, primarily related to allocated loss adjustment expenses for
accident years 2000 to 2005 and by $20 in the second quarter of 2009, principally related to
allocated loss adjustment expenses for accident years 2007 and 2008. During the first quarter
of 2009, the Company identified higher than expected expense payments on older accident years
related to the liability coverage. Additional analysis in the second quarter of 2009 showed
that this higher level of loss adjustment expense is likely to continue into more recent
accident years. As a result, in the second quarter of 2009, the Company increased its
estimates for future expense payments for the 2007 and 2008 accident years. |
|
|
Strengthened reserves for surety business by a net of $10 in the first quarter of 2009 and
by a net of $15 in the second quarter of 2009, primarily related to accident years 2004 to
2007. The net $10 of strengthening in the first quarter of 2009 consisted of $20 strengthening
of reserves for customs bonds, partially offset by a $10 release of reserves for contract
surety claims. The net $15 of strengthening in the second quarter of 2009 consisted of $25
strengthening of reserves for customs bonds, partially offset by a $10 release of reserves for
contract surety claims. During 2008, the Company became aware that there were a large number
of late reported surety claims related to customs bonds. Continued high volume of late
reported claims during the first and second quarters of 2009 caused the Company to strengthen
the reserves in each period. |
|
|
Strengthened reserves for homeowners claims by $18 in the first quarter of 2009, primarily
driven by increased claim settlement costs in recent accident years and increased losses from
underground storage tanks in older accident years. In 2008, the Company began to observe
increasing claim settlement costs for the 2005 to 2008 accident years and, in the first
quarter of 2009, determined that this higher cost level would continue, resulting in a reserve
strengthening of $9 for these accident years. In addition, beginning in 2008, the Company
observed unfavorable emergence of homeowners casualty claims for accident years 2003 and
prior, primarily related to underground storage tanks. Following a detailed review of these
claims in the first quarter of 2009, management increased its estimate of the magnitude of
this exposure and strengthened homeowners casualty claim reserves by $9. |
104
Other Operations
|
|
During the second quarter of 2009, the Company completed its annual ground up asbestos
reserve evaluation. As part of this evaluation, the Company reviewed all of its open direct
domestic insurance accounts exposed to asbestos liability as well as assumed reinsurance
accounts and its London Market exposures for both direct insurance and assumed reinsurance.
Based on this evaluation, the Company increased its net asbestos reserves by $138. For
certain direct policyholders, the Company experienced increases in claim severity, expense and
costs associated with litigating asbestos coverage matters. Increases in severity and expense
were most prevalent among certain, peripheral defendant insureds. The Company also
experienced unfavorable development on its assumed reinsurance accounts driven largely by the
same factors experienced by the direct policyholders. |
|
|
During the second quarter of 2009, the Company completed its annual evaluation of the
collectibility of the reinsurance recoverables and the adequacy of the allowance for
uncollectible reinsurance associated with older, long-term casualty liabilities reported in
the Other Operations segment. Based on this evaluation, the Company reduced its allowance for
uncollectible reinsurance for Other Operations by $20, principally to reflect decreased
reinsurance recoverable dispute exposure and favorable commutation activity since the last
evaluation. |
Risk Management Strategy
Refer to the MD&A in The Hartfords 2008 Form 10-K Annual Report for an explanation of Property &
Casualtys risk management strategy.
Use of Reinsurance
In managing risk, The Hartford utilizes reinsurance to transfer risk to well-established and
financially secure reinsurers. Reinsurance is used to manage aggregations of risk as well as
specific risks based on accumulated property and casualty liabilities in certain geographic zones.
All treaty purchases related to the Companys property and casualty operations are administered by
a centralized function to support a consistent strategy and ensure that the reinsurance activities
are fully integrated into the organizations risk management processes.
A variety of traditional reinsurance products are used as part of the Companys risk management
strategy, including excess of loss occurrence-based products that protect property and workers
compensation exposures, and individual risk or quota share arrangements, that protect specific
classes or lines of business. There are no significant finite risk contracts in place and the
statutory surplus benefit from all such prior year contracts is immaterial. Facultative
reinsurance is also used to manage policy-specific risk exposures based on established underwriting
guidelines. The Hartford also participates in governmentally administered reinsurance facilities
such as the Florida Hurricane Catastrophe Fund (FHCF), the Terrorism Risk Insurance Program
established under The Terrorism Risk Insurance Program Reauthorization Act of 2007 (TRIPRA) and
other reinsurance programs relating to particular risks or specific lines of business.
The Company has several catastrophe reinsurance programs, including reinsurance treaties that cover
property and workers compensation losses aggregating from single catastrophe events. The
following table summarizes the primary catastrophe treaty reinsurance coverages that the Company
has in place as of July 1, 2009 including the treaties that renewed during the second quarter of
2009. Refer to the MD&A in The Hartfords 2008 Form 10-K Annual Report for an explanation of the
Companys primary catastrophe program that renewed on January 1, 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of layer(s) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Coverage |
|
Treaty term |
|
|
reinsured |
|
|
Per occurrence limit |
|
|
Retention |
|
Principal property catastrophe program covering property catastrophe losses
from a single event |
|
1/1/2009 to 1/1/2010 |
|
Varies by layer, but averages 90% across all layers |
|
|
$ Aggregates to $750 across all layers |
|
|
$ |
250 |
|
Layer covering property catastrophe losses
from a single event |
|
6/1/2009 to 12/31/2009 |
|
45.8 |
% |
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
1,000 |
|
Reinsurance with the FHCF covering
Florida Personal
Lines property
catastrophe losses
from a single event |
|
6/1/2009 to 6/1/2010 |
|
90 |
% |
|
|
410 [1] |
|
|
|
83 |
|
Workers compensation losses
arising from a
single catastrophe
event |
|
7/1/2009 to 7/1/2010 |
|
95 |
% |
|
|
280 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
|
[1] |
|
The per occurrence limit on the FHCF treaty is $410 for the 6/1/2009 to 6/1/2010 treaty
year based on the Companys election to purchase additional limits under the Temporary
Increase in Coverage Limit (TICL) statutory provision in excess of the coverage the Company
is required to purchase from the FHCF. |
105
In addition to the property catastrophe reinsurance coverage described in the above table, the
Company has other treaties and facultative reinsurance agreements that cover property catastrophe
losses on an aggregate excess of loss and on a per risk basis. The principal property catastrophe
reinsurance program and other reinsurance programs include a provision to reinstate limits in the
event that a catastrophe loss exhausts limits on one or more layers under the treaties.
The Texas Windstorm Insurance Association (TWIA)
TWIA provides hail and windstorm coverage to Texas residents of 14 counties along the Texas Gulf
coast who are unable to obtain insurance from other carriers. Insurance carriers who write
property insurance in the state of Texas, including The Hartford, are required to be members of
TWIA and are obligated to pay assessments in the event that TWIA losses exceed funds on hand, the
available funds in the Texas Catastrophe Reserve Trust Fund (CRTF) and any available reinsurance.
Assessments are allocated to carriers based on their share of premium writings in the state of
Texas, as defined.
During 2008, the board of directors of TWIA notified its member companies that it would assess them
$430 to cover TWIA losses from hurricane Ike.
The TWIA board indicated that the first $370 of TWIA losses from hurricane Ike would be covered by
the CRTF, but that the cost of TWIA losses and reinstatement premium above that amount would be
funded by assessments. Of the $430 in assessments, $230 is to fund the first $230 of TWIA losses
in excess of the $370 available in the CRTF and $200 is to fund additional reinsurance premiums
that TWIA must pay to reinstate a layer of coverage that reimburses TWIA for up to $1.5 billion of
TWIA losses in excess of $600 per occurrence. Thus, TWIAs assessment notice for $430 is based on
an estimate that TWIA losses from hurricane Ike will total approximately $2.1 billion. If TWIA
losses exceed $2.1 billion, the entire amount in excess of $2.1 billion would be recovered from
assessing member companies according to their market share. In notifying member companies in 2008,
TWIAs board of directors stated that actual TWIA losses would likely be greater than $2.1 billion
and, in the third quarter of 2008, management accrued a total of $27 in assessments for Ike based
on an estimate that TWIAs Ike ultimate losses would be approximately $2.5 billion and that
ultimate TWIA assessments to the industry for hurricane Ike would be approximately $830. Of the
$27 in assessments for Ike recorded in the third quarter of 2008, $7 was recorded as incurred
losses within current accident year catastrophes and $20 was recorded as insurance operating costs
and expenses.
In the first quarter of 2009, management learned that TWIA reduced its estimate of ultimate losses
from hurricane Ike to an amount close to the $2.1 billion estimate on which TWIA based its
assessment notice. Given the reduction in estimated TWIA losses from hurricane Ike, the Company
reduced its estimated assessments by $14 in the first quarter of 2009, from $27 to $13, resulting
in a reduction in insurance operating costs and expenses.
Through premium tax credits, member companies may recoup a portion of Ike-related assessments made
to cover the first $2.1 billion of TWIA losses and may recoup all of the Ike-related assessments
made to fund losses in excess of that amount. Under generally accepted accounting principles, the
Company is required to accrue the assessments in the period the assessments become probable and
estimable and the obligating event has occurred. However, premium tax credits may not be recorded
as an asset until the related premium is earned and TWIA requires that premium tax credits be
spread over a period of at least five years. The Company estimates that of the $13 of accrued
assessments for Ike, it will ultimately be able to recoup $8 through premium tax credits.
Reinsurance Recoverables
Refer to the MD&A in The Hartfords 2008 Form 10-K Annual Report for an explanation of Property &
Casualtys reinsurance recoverables.
Premium Measures
Written premium is a statutory accounting financial measure which represents the amount of premiums
charged for policies issued, net of reinsurance, during a fiscal period. Earned premium is a
measure under both U.S. GAAP and statutory accounting principles. Premiums are considered earned
and are included in the financial results on a pro rata basis over the policy period. Management
believes that written premium is a performance measure that is useful to investors as it reflects
current trends in the Companys sale of property and casualty insurance products. Written and
earned premium are recorded net of ceded reinsurance premium. Reinstatement premium represents
additional ceded premium paid for the reinstatement of the amount of reinsurance coverage that was
reduced as a result of a reinsurance loss payment.
Unless otherwise specified, the following discussion speaks to changes in the three and six month
periods of 2009 as compared to the respective prior year periods.
106
TOTAL PROPERTY & CASUALTY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
Operating Summary |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
Change |
|
Earned premiums |
|
$ |
2,478 |
|
|
$ |
2,586 |
|
|
|
(4 |
%) |
|
$ |
4,989 |
|
|
$ |
5,200 |
|
|
|
(4 |
%) |
Net investment income |
|
|
280 |
|
|
|
391 |
|
|
|
(28 |
%) |
|
|
505 |
|
|
|
756 |
|
|
|
(33 |
%) |
Other revenues [1] |
|
|
120 |
|
|
|
125 |
|
|
|
(4 |
%) |
|
|
238 |
|
|
|
245 |
|
|
|
(3 |
%) |
Net realized capital losses |
|
|
(78 |
) |
|
|
(51 |
) |
|
|
(53 |
%) |
|
|
(401 |
) |
|
|
(203 |
) |
|
|
(98 |
%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
|
2,800 |
|
|
|
3,051 |
|
|
|
(8 |
%) |
|
|
5,331 |
|
|
|
5,998 |
|
|
|
(11 |
%) |
Losses and loss adjustment expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current accident year before catastrophes |
|
|
1,534 |
|
|
|
1,639 |
|
|
|
(6 |
%) |
|
|
3,115 |
|
|
|
3,264 |
|
|
|
(5 |
%) |
Current accident year catastrophes |
|
|
142 |
|
|
|
171 |
|
|
|
(17 |
%) |
|
|
207 |
|
|
|
221 |
|
|
|
(6 |
%) |
Prior accident years |
|
|
62 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
NM |
|
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
(20 |
) |
|
|
70 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total losses and loss adjustment expenses |
|
|
1,738 |
|
|
|
1,826 |
|
|
|
(5 |
%) |
|
|
3,316 |
|
|
|
3,465 |
|
|
|
(4 |
%) |
Amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs |
|
|
518 |
|
|
|
521 |
|
|
|
(1 |
%) |
|
|
1,041 |
|
|
|
1,044 |
|
|
|
|
|
Insurance operating costs and expenses |
|
|
190 |
|
|
|
189 |
|
|
|
1 |
% |
|
|
351 |
|
|
|
342 |
|
|
|
3 |
% |
Other expenses |
|
|
163 |
|
|
|
182 |
|
|
|
(10 |
%) |
|
|
322 |
|
|
|
362 |
|
|
|
(11 |
%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total losses and expenses |
|
|
2,609 |
|
|
|
2,718 |
|
|
|
(4 |
%) |
|
|
5,030 |
|
|
|
5,213 |
|
|
|
(4 |
%) |
Income before income taxes |
|
|
191 |
|
|
|
333 |
|
|
|
(43 |
%) |
|
|
301 |
|
|
|
785 |
|
|
|
(62 |
%) |
Income tax expense |
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
84 |
|
|
|
(79 |
%) |
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
210 |
|
|
|
(92 |
%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income [2] |
|
$ |
173 |
|
|
$ |
249 |
|
|
|
(31 |
%) |
|
$ |
285 |
|
|
$ |
575 |
|
|
|
(50 |
%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income (Loss) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ongoing Operations |
|
$ |
222 |
|
|
$ |
246 |
|
|
|
(10 |
%) |
|
$ |
333 |
|
|
$ |
558 |
|
|
|
(40 |
%) |
Other Operations |
|
|
(49 |
) |
|
|
3 |
|
|
NM |
|
|
|
(48 |
) |
|
|
17 |
|
|
NM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Property & Casualty net income |
|
$ |
173 |
|
|
$ |
249 |
|
|
|
(31 |
%) |
|
$ |
285 |
|
|
$ |
575 |
|
|
|
(50 |
%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1] |
|
Represents servicing revenue. |
|
[2] |
|
Includes net realized capital losses, after-tax, of $(41) and
$(33) for the three months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008,
respectively, and $(252) and $(132) for the six months ended June
30, 2009 and 2008, respectively. |
Three months ended June 30, 2009 compared to the three months ended June 30, 2008
Net income decreased by $76, or 31%, as a result of a $49 net loss in Other Operations and a $24
decrease in Ongoing Operations net income. See the Ongoing Operations and Other Operations
segment MD&A discussions for an analysis of the underwriting results and investment performance
driving the decrease in net income.
Six months ended June 30, 2009 compared to the six months ended June 30, 2008
Net income decreased by $290, or 50%, as a result of a $225 decrease in Ongoing Operations net
income and a change from net income of $17 to a net loss of $48 in Other Operations. See the
Ongoing Operations and Other Operations segment MD&A discussions for an analysis of the
underwriting results and investment performance driving the decrease in net income.
107
ONGOING OPERATIONS
Ongoing Operations includes the four underwriting segments of Personal Lines, Small
Commercial, Middle Market and Specialty Commercial.
Operating Summary
Net income for Ongoing Operations includes underwriting results for each of its segments, income
from servicing businesses, net investment income, other expenses and net realized capital gains
(losses), net of related income taxes.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
Change |
|
Written premiums |
|
$ |
2,462 |
|
|
$ |
2,583 |
|
|
|
(5 |
%) |
|
$ |
4,920 |
|
|
$ |
5,167 |
|
|
|
(5 |
%) |
Change in unearned premium reserve |
|
|
(15 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
NM |
|
|
|
(68 |
) |
|
|
(30 |
) |
|
|
(127 |
%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earned premiums |
|
|
2,477 |
|
|
|
2,584 |
|
|
|
(4 |
%) |
|
|
4,988 |
|
|
|
5,197 |
|
|
|
(4 |
%) |
Losses and loss adjustment expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current accident year before catastrophes |
|
|
1,534 |
|
|
|
1,639 |
|
|
|
(6 |
%) |
|
|
3,115 |
|
|
|
3,264 |
|
|
|
(5 |
%) |
Current accident year catastrophes |
|
|
142 |
|
|
|
171 |
|
|
|
(17 |
%) |
|
|
207 |
|
|
|
221 |
|
|
|
(6 |
%) |
Prior accident years |
|
|
(59 |
) |
|
|
(39 |
) |
|
|
(51 |
%) |
|
|
(127 |
) |
|
|
(90 |
) |
|
|
(41 |
%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total losses and loss adjustment expenses |
|
|
1,617 |
|
|
|
1,771 |
|
|
|
(9 |
%) |
|
|
3,195 |
|
|
|
3,395 |
|
|
|
(6 |
%) |
Amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs |
|
|
518 |
|
|
|
521 |
|
|
|
(1 |
%) |
|
|
1,041 |
|
|
|
1,044 |
|
|
|
|
|
Insurance operating costs and expenses |
|
|
186 |
|
|
|
184 |
|
|
|
1 |
% |
|
|
342 |
|
|
|
332 |
|
|
|
3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Underwriting results |
|
|
156 |
|
|
|
108 |
|
|
|
44 |
% |
|
|
410 |
|
|
|
426 |
|
|
|
(4 |
%) |
Net servicing income [1] |
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
(13 |
%) |
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
114 |
% |
Net investment income |
|
|
239 |
|
|
|
334 |
|
|
|
(28 |
%) |
|
|
424 |
|
|
|
644 |
|
|
|
(34 |
%) |
Net realized capital losses |
|
|
(80 |
) |
|
|
(53 |
) |
|
|
(51 |
%) |
|
|
(369 |
) |
|
|
(187 |
) |
|
|
(97 |
%) |
Other expenses |
|
|
(48 |
) |
|
|
(65 |
) |
|
|
26 |
% |
|
|
(98 |
) |
|
|
(122 |
) |
|
|
20 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes |
|
|
274 |
|
|
|
332 |
|
|
|
(17 |
%) |
|
|
382 |
|
|
|
768 |
|
|
|
(50 |
%) |
Income tax expense |
|
|
(52 |
) |
|
|
(86 |
) |
|
|
40 |
% |
|
|
(49 |
) |
|
|
(210 |
) |
|
|
77 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
222 |
|
|
$ |
246 |
|
|
|
(10 |
%) |
|
$ |
333 |
|
|
$ |
558 |
|
|
|
(40 |
%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss and loss adjustment expense ratio |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current accident year before catastrophes |
|
|
61.9 |
|
|
|
63.4 |
|
|
|
1.5 |
|
|
|
62.5 |
|
|
|
62.8 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
Current accident year catastrophes |
|
|
5.8 |
|
|
|
6.6 |
|
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
|
4.2 |
|
|
|
4.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
Prior accident years |
|
|
(2.4 |
) |
|
|
(1.5 |
) |
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
|
(2.6 |
) |
|
|
(1.7 |
) |
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loss and loss adjustment expense ratio |
|
|
65.3 |
|
|
|
68.5 |
|
|
|
3.2 |
|
|
|
64.0 |
|
|
|
65.3 |
|
|
|
1.3 |
|
Expense ratio |
|
|
28.2 |
|
|
|
26.5 |
|
|
|
(1.7 |
) |
|
|
27.5 |
|
|
|
26.0 |
|
|
|
(1.5 |
) |
Policyholder dividend ratio |
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Combined ratio |
|
|
93.7 |
|
|
|
95.8 |
|
|
|
2.1 |
|
|
|
91.8 |
|
|
|
91.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Catastrophe ratio |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current accident year |
|
|
5.8 |
|
|
|
6.6 |
|
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
|
4.2 |
|
|
|
4.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
Prior accident years |
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total catastrophe ratio |
|
|
5.6 |
|
|
|
6.6 |
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
4.2 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Combined ratio before catastrophes |
|
|
88.1 |
|
|
|
89.2 |
|
|
|
1.1 |
|
|
|
87.6 |
|
|
|
87.8 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
Combined ratio before catastrophes and prior
accident year development |
|
|
90.4 |
|
|
|
90.7 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
90.2 |
|
|
|
89.3 |
|
|
|
(0.9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1] |
|
Net of expenses related to service business. |
Three months ended June 30, 2009 compared to the three months ended June 30, 2008
Net income
Net income decreased by $24 due to a decrease in net investment income and an increase in net
realized capital losses, partially offset by an increase in underwriting results.
Net investment income decreased by $95
Primarily driving the $95 decrease in net investment income was an increase in losses from limited
partnerships and other alternative investments and a decrease in income on fixed maturity
investments. The increased losses on limited partnerships and other alternative investments was
largely driven by losses on real estate and private equity partnerships as a result of declines in
the estimated value of the underlying investments. The decrease in income from fixed maturities
primarily resulted from lower income on variable rate securities due to declines in short-term
interest rates as well as an increased allocation to lower-yielding U.S. Treasuries.
108
Net realized capital losses increased by $27
The increase in net realized capital losses of $27 in 2009 was primarily due to an increase in
realized losses on credit derivatives and valuation losses on impaired mortgage loans, partially
offset by an increase in net gains on sales of municipal securities. See the Investment Results
discussion within the Executive Overview Section of the MD&A for further information.
Underwriting results increased by $48
Underwriting results increased by $48 with a corresponding 2.1 point decrease in the combined
ratio, from 95.8 to 93.7, due to:
|
|
|
|
|
Change in underwriting results |
|
|
|
|
Decrease in earned premiums |
|
$ |
(107 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Losses and loss adjustment expenses |
|
|
|
|
Volume change Decrease in current accident year losses and loss adjustment expenses before
catastrophes due to the decrease in earned premium |
|
|
68 |
|
Ratio change A decrease in the current accident year loss and loss adjustment expense ratio
before catastrophes |
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
|
|
Decrease in current accident year losses and loss adjustment expenses before catastrophes |
|
|
105 |
|
Catastrophes Decrease in current accident year catastrophe losses |
|
|
29 |
|
Reserve changes An increase in net favorable prior accident year reserve development |
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
|
|
Net decrease in losses and loss adjustment expenses |
|
|
154 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses |
|
|
|
|
Decrease in amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs |
|
|
3 |
|
Increase in insurance operating costs and expenses |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Net decrease in operating expenses |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase in underwriting results from 2008 to 2009 |
|
$ |
48 |
|
|
|
|
|
Earned premium decreased by $107
Ongoing Operations earned premiums decreased by $107, or 4%, primarily due to a 10% decrease in
Specialty Commercial, a 6% decrease in Middle Market and a 6% decrease in Small Commercial. Refer
to the Earned Premium discussion in the Executive Overview Section of the Property & Casualty MD&A
for further discussion of the decrease in earned premium.
Losses and loss adjustment expenses decreased by $154
Current accident year losses and loss adjustment expenses before catastrophes decreased by
$105
Ongoing Operations current accident year losses and loss adjustment expenses before catastrophes
decreased by $105 due to a decrease in earned premium and a decrease in the current accident year
loss and loss adjustment expense ratio before catastrophes. The current accident year loss and
loss adjustment expense ratio before catastrophes decreased by 1.5 points, to 61.9, driven by
decreases in Small Commercial and Middle Market. Refer to the segment MD&A discussions for further
analysis of the decrease in current accident year losses and loss adjustment expenses before
catastrophes driving the increase in underwriting results.
Current accident year catastrophes decreased by $29
Current accident year catastrophe losses of $142, or 5.8 points, in 2009 were lower than current
accident year catastrophe losses of $171, or 6.6 points, in 2008, as losses from tornadoes and
thunderstorms in the South and Midwest were lower in 2009 than in 2008.
Net favorable prior accident year reserve development increased by $20
Net favorable prior accident year reserve development increased from $39, or 1.5 points, in 2008,
to $59, or 2.4 points, in 2009. Among other reserve changes, net favorable reserve development of
$59 in 2009 included the release of general liability reserves in Middle Market and professional
liability claim reserves in Specialty Commercial. See the Reserves Section of the MD&A for further
discussion of the prior accident year reserve development in 2009. Among other reserve changes,
net favorable reserve development of $39 in 2008 included a release of workers compensation
reserves in Small Commercial and a release of reserves for high hazard and umbrella general
liability claims in Middle Market.
109
Operating expenses decreased by $1
Amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs decreased by $3 primarily due to the decrease in
earned premiums, partially offset by an increase in amortization of acquisition costs for Personal
Lines policies for business sold through AARP and direct to the consumer. Insurance operating
costs and expenses increased by $2, primarily due to a $23 increase in taxes, licenses and fees due
to a $6 increase in the assessment for a second injury fund and $17 reserve strengthening for other
state funds and taxes, largely offset by a $15 increase in the estimated amount of dividends
payable to certain workers compensation policyholders due to underwriting profits in 2008. The
expense ratio increased by 1.7 points, to 28.2, primarily due to the decrease in earned premium,
the higher amount of amortization of Personal Lines acquisition costs, increased IT costs and an
increase in taxes, licenses and fees.
Income tax expense decreased by $34
Income taxes decreased from $86 in 2008 to $52 in 2009 due to a decrease in pre-tax income and a
$15 tax benefit from the sale of an equity investment in the second quarter of 2009.
Six months ended June 30, 2009 compared to the six months ended June 30, 2008
Net income
Net income decreased by $225, due to a decrease in net investment income, an increase in net
realized capital losses and a decrease in underwriting results.
Net investment income decreased by $220
Primarily driving the $220 decrease in net investment income was an increase in losses from limited
partnerships and other alternative investments and a decrease in income on fixed maturity
investments. The increased losses on limited partnerships and other alternative investments was
largely driven by losses on real estate and private equity partnerships as a result of declines in
the estimated value of the underlying investments. The decrease in income from fixed maturities
primarily resulted from lower income on variable rate securities due to declines in short-term
interest rates as well as an increased allocation to lower-yielding U.S. Treasuries.
Net realized capital losses increased by $182
The increase in net realized capital losses of $182 in 2009 was primarily due to an increase in
realized losses on sales of securities, including sales of lower quality securities, mainly
financial services and CMBS. See the Investment Results discussion within the Executive Overview
Section of the MD&A for further information.
Underwriting results decreased by $16
Underwriting results decreased by $16, due to:
|
|
|
|
|
Change in underwriting results |
|
|
|
|
Decrease in earned premiums |
|
$ |
(209 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Losses and loss adjustment expenses |
|
|
|
|
Volume change Decrease in current accident year losses and loss adjustment expenses before
catastrophes due to the decrease in earned premium |
|
|
131 |
|
Ratio change A decrease in the current accident year loss and loss adjustment expense ratio
before catastrophes |
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
|
|
Decrease in current accident year losses and loss adjustment expenses before catastrophes |
|
|
149 |
|
Catastrophes Decrease in current accident year catastrophe losses |
|
|
14 |
|
Reserve changes An increase in net favorable prior accident years reserve development |
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
|
|
Net decrease in losses and loss adjustment expenses |
|
|
200 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses |
|
|
|
|
Decrease in amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs |
|
|
3 |
|
Increase in insurance operating costs and expenses |
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Net increase in operating expenses |
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Decrease in underwriting results from 2008 to 2009 |
|
$ |
(16 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Earned premiums decreased by $209
Ongoing Operations earned premiums decreased by $209, or 4%, primarily due to an 8% decrease in
Specialty Commercial, a 7% decrease in Middle Market and a 5% decrease in Small Commercial. Refer
to the Earned Premium discussion in the Executive Overview Section of the Property & Casualty MD&A
for further discussion of the decrease in earned premium.
110
Losses and loss adjustment expenses decreased by $200
Current accident year losses and loss adjustment expenses before catastrophes decreased by
$149
Ongoing Operations current accident year losses and loss adjustment expenses before catastrophes
decreased by $149 due primarily to a decrease in earned premiums. The current accident year loss
and loss adjustment expense ratio before catastrophes decreased by 0.3 points, to 62.5 primarily
driven by a decrease in Small Commercial and, to a lesser extent, decreases in Personal Lines and
Middle Market. Refer to the segment MD&A discussions for further analysis of the decrease in
current accident year losses and loss adjustment expenses before catastrophes.
Current accident year catastrophes decreased by $14
Current accident year catastrophe losses of $207, or 4.2 points, in 2009 were lower than current
accident year catastrophe losses of $221, or 4.2 points, in 2008, as losses from ice storms,
tornadoes and thunderstorms in 2009 were lower than losses from tornadoes, thunderstorms and winter
storms in 2008.
Net favorable prior accident year reserve development increased by $37
Net favorable prior accident year reserve development increased from $90, or 1.7 points, in 2008,
to $127, or 2.6 points, in 2009. Among other reserve changes, net favorable reserve development of
$127 in 2009 included the release of general liability reserves in Middle Market and professional
liability claim reserves in Specialty Commercial. Refer to the Reserves Section of the MD&A for
further discussion of the prior accident year reserve development in 2009. Among other reserve
developments, net favorable development in 2008 included a $58 release of workers compensation
reserves in Small Commercial and Middle Market and a $42 release of reserves for high hazard and
umbrella general liability claims, primarily related to the 2001 to 2006 accident years.
Operating expenses increased by $7
Insurance operating costs and expenses increased by $10, primarily due to a $23 increase in taxes,
licenses and fees due to a $6 increase in the assessment for a second injury fund and $17 reserve
strengthening for other state funds and taxes and an increase in IT costs, largely offset by a $15
increase in the estimated amount of dividends payable to certain workers compensation
policyholders due to underwriting profits in 2008 and a $14 reduction in TWIA assessments related
to hurricane Ike in 2009. The expense ratio increased by 1.5 points, to 27.5, primarily due to the
decrease in earned premium, the higher amount of amortization of Personal Lines acquisition costs
and the increase in insurance operating costs and expenses other than policyholder dividends.
Income tax expense decreased by $161
Income tax expense decreased from $210 in 2008 to $49 in 2009 primarily due to a decrease in
pre-tax income, a $17 benefit from a tax true-up and a $15 tax benefit from the sale of an equity
investment in the second quarter of 2009. Apart from the tax true-up and tax benefit, the
effective tax rate on pre-tax income dropped from 27% in 2008 to 21% in 2009. Due primarily to the
larger amount of net realized losses from investments in 2009, net investment income generated from
tax-exempt securities represented a greater share of pre-tax income in 2009 than in 2008.
111
PERSONAL LINES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
Premiums |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
Change |
|
Written Premiums [1] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Business Unit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AARP |
|
$ |
763 |
|
|
$ |
741 |
|
|
|
3 |
% |
|
$ |
1,444 |
|
|
$ |
1,403 |
|
|
|
3 |
% |
Agency |
|
|
268 |
|
|
|
271 |
|
|
|
(1 |
%) |
|
|
517 |
|
|
|
529 |
|
|
|
(2 |
%) |
Other |
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
(18 |
%) |
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
(15 |
%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
1,045 |
|
|
$ |
1,029 |
|
|
|
2 |
% |
|
$ |
1,989 |
|
|
$ |
1,965 |
|
|
|
1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product Line |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Automobile |
|
$ |
742 |
|
|
$ |
729 |
|
|
|
2 |
% |
|
$ |
1,449 |
|
|
$ |
1,427 |
|
|
|
2 |
% |
Homeowners |
|
|
303 |
|
|
|
300 |
|
|
|
1 |
% |
|
|
540 |
|
|
|
538 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
1,045 |
|
|
$ |
1,029 |
|
|
|
2 |
% |
|
$ |
1,989 |
|
|
$ |
1,965 |
|
|
|
1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earned Premiums [1] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Business Unit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AARP |
|
$ |
709 |
|
|
$ |
691 |
|
|
|
3 |
% |
|
$ |
1,412 |
|
|
$ |
1,378 |
|
|
|
2 |
% |
Agency |
|
|
261 |
|
|
|
273 |
|
|
|
(4 |
%) |
|
|
522 |
|
|
|
550 |
|
|
|
(5 |
%) |
Other |
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
(6 |
%) |
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
(14 |
%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
985 |
|
|
$ |
980 |
|
|
|
1 |
% |
|
$ |
1,964 |
|
|
$ |
1,963 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product Line |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Automobile |
|
$ |
711 |
|
|
$ |
707 |
|
|
|
1 |
% |
|
$ |
1,415 |
|
|
$ |
1,413 |
|
|
|
|
|
Homeowners |
|
|
274 |
|
|
|
273 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
549 |
|
|
|
550 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
985 |
|
|
$ |
980 |
|
|
|
1 |
% |
|
$ |
1,964 |
|
|
$ |
1,963 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1] |
|
The difference between written premiums and earned premiums is attributable to the change in unearned premium reserve. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Premium Measures |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Policies in-force end of period |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Automobile |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,375,240 |
|
|
|
2,326,188 |
|
Homeowners |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,471,287 |
|
|
|
1,471,920 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total policies in-force end of period |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,846,527 |
|
|
|
3,798,108 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New business premium |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Automobile |
|
$ |
124 |
|
|
$ |
87 |
|
|
$ |
239 |
|
|
$ |
171 |
|
Homeowners |
|
$ |
40 |
|
|
$ |
27 |
|
|
$ |
71 |
|
|
$ |
51 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Premium Renewal Retention |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Automobile |
|
|
85 |
% |
|
|
87 |
% |
|
|
85 |
% |
|
|
88 |
% |
Homeowners |
|
|
87 |
% |
|
|
91 |
% |
|
|
88 |
% |
|
|
90 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Written Pricing Increase |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Automobile |
|
|
3 |
% |
|
|
4 |
% |
|
|
3 |
% |
|
|
4 |
% |
Homeowners |
|
|
5 |
% |
|
|
6 |
% |
|
|
5 |
% |
|
|
6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earned Pricing Increase |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Automobile |
|
|
3 |
% |
|
|
1 |
% |
|
|
3 |
% |
|
|
1 |
% |
Homeowners |
|
|
6 |
% |
|
|
3 |
% |
|
|
6 |
% |
|
|
3 |
% |
Earned Premiums
Three and six months ended June 30, 2009 compared to the three and six months ended June 30, 2008
Earned premiums remained relatively flat for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009,
primarily due to earned premium growth in AARP, offset by earned premium decreases in Agency and
Other.
|
|
AARP earned premium grew $18 and $34, respectively, for the three and six months ended June
30, 2009, reflecting an increase in earned pricing and an increase in new business since the
fourth quarter of 2008, partially offset by a decrease in premium renewal retention since the
fourth quarter of 2008. The increase in new business has been driven by growth in the size of
the AARP target market, the effect of direct marketing programs and the effect of
cross-selling homeowners insurance to insureds who have auto policies. Partially offsetting
the increase in earned premium was the effect of a shift to more preferred market segment
business (which lowers average premium) and the effect of the economic downturn on consumer
behavior. Among other actions, insureds have been reducing their premiums by raising
deductibles, reducing limits, dropping coverage and reducing mileage. |
112
|
|
Agency earned premium decreased by $12 and $28, respectively, for the three and six months
ended June 30, 2009 due primarily to a decline in premium renewal retention and a shift to
more preferred market segment business (which lowers average premium) and the effect of the
economic downturn causing consumers to take actions to lower their premium. The decrease in
renewal retention was driven, in part, by the Companys decision to stop renewing Florida
homeowners policies sold through agents beginning in the third quarter of 2008. Partially
offsetting the factors decreasing earned premium was an increase in earned pricing and an
increase in new business in the first six months of 2009. Contributing to the increase in new
business in 2009 was the effect of an increase in the number of agency appointments and
increased flow from existing agents. |
|
|
Other earned premium decreased slightly, for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009,
primarily due to a strategic decision to reduce other affinity business. |
Auto earned premium grew slightly for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 as the effect of
modest earned pricing increases and an increase in new business over the first six months of 2009
was largely offset by a decline in premium renewal retention, shift of business to more preferred
market segments and consumer actions to lower their premium. Homeowners earned premium was
relatively flat as the effect of earned pricing increases was offset by a decline in premium
renewal retention, shift of business to more preferred market segments and consumer actions to
lower their premium.
|
|
|
New business
premium
|
|
Both auto and homeowners new business written
premium increased in the three and six months ended June
30, 2009. Auto new business increased by $37, or 43%,
for the three month period and by $68, or 40%, for the
six month period. Homeowners new business premium
increased by $13, or 48%, for the three month period and
by $20, or 39%, for the six month period. AARP new
business written premium increased primarily due to
increased direct marketing spend, higher auto policy
conversion rates and cross-selling homeowners insurance
to insureds who have auto policies. Agency new business
written premium increased primarily due to an increase
in the number of policy quotes and the policy issue
rate. |
|
|
|
Premium
renewal
retention
|
|
Premium renewal retention for auto decreased
from 87% to 85% in the three month period and from 88%
to 85% in the six month period, as renewal retention
decreased in both AARP and Agency. Auto premium renewal
retention decreased primarily due to the effects on
average premium of a shift to more preferred market
segment business and consumer actions to lower their
premiums. Premium renewal retention for homeowners
decreased from 91% to 87% in the three month period and
from 90% to 88% in the six month period, primarily due
to a decrease in policy retention for Agency business
driven, in part, by the Companys decision to stop
renewing Florida homeowners policies. |
|
|
|
Earned pricing
increase
|
|
The changes in earned pricing during the three
and six months ended June 30, 2009 were primarily a
reflection of written pricing changes over the last nine
months of 2008 and the first three months of 2009.
Written pricing increased in auto by 3% in the three and
six months ended June 30, 2009 as the Company has
increased rates in certain states for certain classes of
business to maintain profitability in the face of rising
loss costs. Homeowners written pricing continued to
increase due largely to rate increases and increases in
building values. |
|
|
|
Policies in-force
|
|
The number of policies in-force increased 2% in
auto, primarily due to an increase in the number of AARP
auto policies in-force and remained relatively flat for
homeowners, as a 3% increase in the number of AARP
homeowners policies in-force was offset by a 7% decline
in the number of Agency homeowners policies in-force.
The number of Agency policies in-force decreased
primarily because of the Companys decision to stop
renewing Florida homeowners policies. |
113
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
Personal Lines Underwriting Summary |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
Change |
|
Written premiums |
|
$ |
1,045 |
|
|
$ |
1,029 |
|
|
|
2 |
% |
|
$ |
1,989 |
|
|
$ |
1,965 |
|
|
|
1 |
% |
Change in unearned premium reserve |
|
|
60 |
|
|
|
49 |
|
|
|
22 |
% |
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
NM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earned premiums |
|
|
985 |
|
|
|
980 |
|
|
|
1 |
% |
|
|
1,964 |
|
|
|
1,963 |
|
|
|
|
|
Losses and loss adjustment expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current accident year before catastrophes |
|
|
649 |
|
|
|
645 |
|
|
|
1 |
% |
|
|
1,276 |
|
|
|
1,280 |
|
|
|
|
|
Current accident year catastrophes |
|
|
110 |
|
|
|
97 |
|
|
|
13 |
% |
|
|
152 |
|
|
|
127 |
|
|
|
20 |
% |
Prior accident years |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
(100 |
%) |
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
NM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total losses and loss adjustment expenses |
|
|
759 |
|
|
|
743 |
|
|
|
2 |
% |
|
|
1,438 |
|
|
|
1,400 |
|
|
|
3 |
% |
Amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs |
|
|
168 |
|
|
|
155 |
|
|
|
8 |
% |
|
|
334 |
|
|
|
311 |
|
|
|
7 |
% |
Insurance operating costs and expenses |
|
|
68 |
|
|
|
64 |
|
|
|
6 |
% |
|
|
127 |
|
|
|
129 |
|
|
|
(2 |
%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Underwriting results |
|
$ |
(10 |
) |
|
$ |
18 |
|
|
|
NM |
|
|
$ |
65 |
|
|
$ |
123 |
|
|
|
(47 |
%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss and loss adjustment expense ratio |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current accident year before catastrophes |
|
|
65.9 |
|
|
|
65.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
65.0 |
|
|
|
65.3 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
Current accident year catastrophes |
|
|
11.2 |
|
|
|
9.8 |
|
|
|
(1.4 |
) |
|
|
7.7 |
|
|
|
6.4 |
|
|
|
(1.3 |
) |
Prior accident years |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
(0.4 |
) |
|
|
(0.9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loss and loss adjustment expense ratio |
|
|
77.0 |
|
|
|
75.8 |
|
|
|
(1.2 |
) |
|
|
73.2 |
|
|
|
71.3 |
|
|
|
(1.9 |
) |
Expense ratio |
|
|
24.0 |
|
|
|
22.4 |
|
|
|
(1.6 |
) |
|
|
23.5 |
|
|
|
22.4 |
|
|
|
(1.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Combined ratio |
|
|
101.0 |
|
|
|
98.1 |
|
|
|
(2.9 |
) |
|
|
96.7 |
|
|
|
93.7 |
|
|
|
(3.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Catastrophe ratio |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current year |
|
|
11.2 |
|
|
|
9.8 |
|
|
|
(1.4 |
) |
|
|
7.7 |
|
|
|
6.4 |
|
|
|
(1.3 |
) |
Prior years |
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
(0.5 |
) |
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
|
|
(1.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total catastrophe ratio |
|
|
12.0 |
|
|
|
10.1 |
|
|
|
(1.9 |
) |
|
|
8.7 |
|
|
|
6.3 |
|
|
|
(2.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Combined ratio before catastrophes |
|
|
89.0 |
|
|
|
88.0 |
|
|
|
(1.0 |
) |
|
|
88.0 |
|
|
|
87.5 |
|
|
|
(0.5 |
) |
Combined ratio before catastrophes and prior
accident years development |
|
|
89.8 |
|
|
|
88.3 |
|
|
|
(1.5 |
) |
|
|
88.4 |
|
|
|
87.7 |
|
|
|
(0.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other revenues [1] |
|
$ |
35 |
|
|
$ |
29 |
|
|
|
21 |
% |
|
$ |
72 |
|
|
$ |
63 |
|
|
|
14 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1] |
|
Represents servicing revenues. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
Combined Ratios |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
Change |
|
Automobile |
|
|
95.6 |
|
|
|
94.3 |
|
|
|
(1.3 |
) |
|
|
92.4 |
|
|
|
93.5 |
|
|
|
1.1 |
|
Homeowners |
|
|
114.9 |
|
|
|
107.9 |
|
|
|
(7.0 |
) |
|
|
107.6 |
|
|
|
94.4 |
|
|
|
(13.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
101.0 |
|
|
|
98.1 |
|
|
|
(2.9 |
) |
|
|
96.7 |
|
|
|
93.7 |
|
|
|
(3.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
114
Underwriting results and ratios
Three months ended June 30, 2009 compared to the three months ended June 30, 2008
Underwriting results decreased by $28, from underwriting income of $18 to an underwriting loss of
$10, with a corresponding 2.9 point increase in the combined ratio, from 98.1 to 101.0, due to:
|
|
|
|
|
Change in underwriting results |
|
|
|
|
Increase in earned premiums |
|
$ |
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Losses and loss adjustment expenses |
|
|
|
|
Ratio change No change in the current accident loss and loss adjustment expense ratio before
catastrophes |
|
|
|
|
Volume change Increase in current accident year losses and loss adjustment expenses before
catastrophes due to the increase in earned premium |
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Increase in current accident year losses and loss adjustment expenses before catastrophes |
|
|
(4 |
) |
Catastrophes Increase in current accident year catastrophes |
|
|
(13 |
) |
Reserve changes A change in prior accident years reserve development |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase in losses and loss adjustment expenses |
|
|
(16 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses |
|
|
|
|
Increase in amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs |
|
|
(13 |
) |
Increase in insurance operating costs and expenses |
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Increase in operating expenses |
|
|
(17 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Decrease in underwriting results from 2008 to 2009 |
|
$ |
(28 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Earned premiums increased by $5
Earned premiums increased $5, as earned premium growth in AARP was partially offset by decreases in
Agency and Other. Refer to the Earned Premiums section above for further discussion.
Losses and loss adjustment expenses increased by $16
Current accident year losses and loss adjustment expenses before catastrophes increased by
$4
Personal Lines current accident year losses and loss adjustment expenses before catastrophes
increased by $4, to $649, due to an increase in earned premiums. The current accident year loss
and loss adjustment expense ratio before catastrophes remained flat at 65.9 as a decrease in the
current accident year loss and loss adjustment expense ratio before catastrophes for AARP auto was
offset by an increase in the ratio for Agency auto and Agency home. The decrease in the loss and
loss adjustment expense ratio for AARP auto was largely due to expected favorable frequency on auto
liability claims, partially offset by increased expected severity for auto liability claims
relative to average premium per exposure. The increase in the loss and loss adjustment expense
ratio for Agency auto was due to an increase in expected liability losses and increased physical
damage frequency relative to average premium per exposure. The increase in the loss and loss
adjustment expense ratio for Agency homeowners was due to increased severity coupled with a decline
in average premium.
Current accident year catastrophes increased by $13
Current accident year catastrophe losses of $110, or 11.2 points, in 2009 were greater than current
accident year catastrophe losses of $97, or 9.8 points, in 2008, as losses from tornadoes and
thunderstorms in the South and Midwest were higher in 2009 than in 2008.
Operating expenses increased by $17
The expense ratio increased by 1.6 points, to 24.0, in 2009, due largely to a $13 increase in
amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs while earned premium remained relatively flat.
Amortization of acquisition costs increased for both AARP business and for business sold direct to
the consumer in four pilot states as a result of increased direct marketing costs. Contributing to
the increase in insurance operating costs and expenses were higher IT costs.
115
Six months ended June 30, 2009 compared to the six months ended June 30, 2008
Underwriting results decreased by $58, from $123 to $65, with a corresponding 3.0 point increase in
the combined ratio, from 93.7 to 96.7, due to:
|
|
|
|
|
Change in underwriting results |
|
|
|
|
Increased in earned premiums |
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Losses and loss adjustment expenses |
|
|
|
|
Ratio change A decrease in the current accident loss and loss adjustment expense ratio before
catastrophes |
|
|
5 |
|
Volume change Increase in current accident year losses and loss adjustment expenses before
catastrophes due to the increase in earned premium |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Decrease in current accident year losses and loss adjustment expenses before catastrophes |
|
|
4 |
|
Catastrophes Increase in current accident year catastrophes |
|
|
(25 |
) |
Reserve changes A change from net favorable to net unfavorable prior accident years reserve
development |
|
|
(17 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Net increase in losses and loss adjustment expenses |
|
|
(38 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses |
|
|
|
|
Increase in amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs |
|
|
(23 |
) |
Decrease in insurance operating costs and expenses |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
Increase in operating expenses |
|
|
(21 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Decrease in underwriting results from 2008 to 2009 |
|
$ |
(58 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Earned premiums increased by $1
Earned premiums increased $1, as growth in AARP earned premiums was largely offset by decreases in
Agency and Other. Refer to the Earned Premiums section above for further discussion.
Losses and loss adjustment expenses increased by $38
Current accident year losses and loss adjustment expenses before catastrophes decreased by
$4
Personal Lines current accident year losses and loss adjustment expenses before catastrophes
decreased by $4, to $1,276, due to a decrease in the current accident year loss and loss adjustment
expense ratio before catastrophes. The current accident year loss and loss adjustment expense
ratio before catastrophes decreased by 0.3 points, to 65.0. The decrease was primarily due to a
lower current accident year loss and loss adjustment expense ratio for AARP auto claims, partially
offset by an increase in the current accident year loss and loss adjustment expense ratio for AARP
and Agency homeowners. The decrease in the loss and loss adjustment expense ratio for AARP auto
was largely due to expected favorable frequency on auto liability claims, partially offset by
increased expected severity for auto liability claims relative to average premium per exposure.
The increase in the loss and loss adjustment expense ratio for AARP and Agency homeowners was due
to increased frequency and severity coupled with slower average premium growth.
Current accident year catastrophes increased by $25
Current accident year catastrophe losses of $152, or 7.7 points, in 2009 were greater than current
accident year catastrophe losses of $127, or 6.4 points, in 2008, as losses from winter storms,
tornadoes and thunderstorms were higher in 2009 than in 2008.
A $17 change to net unfavorable prior accident year reserve development
Net unfavorable reserve development of $10 in 2009 was attributed to $43 of reserve strengthenings,
including an $18 strengthening of reserves for homeowners business, and $33 of releases of
reserves for auto liability claims, primarily related to accident years 2005 to 2007. Net
favorable reserve development of $7 in 2008 included a $9 release of reserves for extra-contractual
liability claims related to non-standard auto liability claims in runoff.
Operating expenses increased by $21
The expense ratio increased by 1.1 points, to 23.5, in 2009, due largely to a $23 increase in
amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs while earned premium remained flat. Amortization
of deferred policy acquisition costs increased for both AARP business and for business sold direct
to the consumer in four pilot states as a result of increased direct marketing costs. Insurance
operating costs and expenses were down slightly as a $7 reduction in TWIA assessments related to
hurricane Ike was largely offset by an increase in other expenses, including higher IT costs.
116
SMALL COMMERCIAL
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
Premiums [1] |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
Change |
|
Written premiums |
|
$ |
643 |
|
|
$ |
679 |
|
|
|
(5 |
%) |
|
$ |
1,336 |
|
|
$ |
1,422 |
|
|
|
(6 |
%) |
Earned premiums |
|
|
643 |
|
|
|
683 |
|
|
|
(6 |
%) |
|
|
1,295 |
|
|
|
1,370 |
|
|
|
(5 |
%) |
|
|
|
[1] |
|
The difference between written premiums and earned premiums is attributable to the change
in unearned premium reserve. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Premium Measures |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
New business premium |
|
$ |
120 |
|
|
$ |
117 |
|
|
$ |
239 |
|
|
$ |
244 |
|
Premium renewal retention |
|
|
78 |
% |
|
|
81 |
% |
|
|
78 |
% |
|
|
82 |
% |
Written pricing decrease |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3 |
%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3 |
%) |
Earned pricing decrease |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2 |
%) |
|
|
(1 |
%) |
|
|
(2 |
%) |
Policies in-force end of period |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,060,482 |
|
|
|
1,057,058 |
|
Earned Premiums
Three and six months ended June 30, 2009 compared to the three and six months ended June 30, 2008
Earned premiums for the Small Commercial segment decreased $40 and $75, respectively for the three
and six month periods, primarily due to lower earned audit premium on workers compensation
business and the effect of non-renewals outpacing new business over the last nine months of 2008
and first three months of 2009 in all lines, including workers compensation, package business and
commercial auto. While the Company has focused on increasing new business from its agents and
expanding writings in certain territories, the effects of the economic downturn and competitor
actions to increase market share and increase business appetite in certain classes of risks have
contributed to the decrease in earned premium in the first six months of 2009.
|
|
|
New business
premium
|
|
New business written premium was up $3, or 3%,
in the three months ended June 30, 2009 and declined $5,
or 2%, for the six months ended June 30, 2009. The
increase in new business written premium in the three
month period was primarily driven by an increase in
workers compensation and the decrease in new business
written premium in the six month period was primarily
due to decreases in new package and commercial
automobile business. While the effects of the economic
downturn and aggressive competition have affected the
Companys ability to grow its business, particularly for
package and commercial auto, the Company continues to
increase its new business for workers compensation
through refinement of pricing and underwriting appetite
in certain markets. |
|
|
|
Premium renewal
retention
|
|
Premium renewal retention decreased from 81% to
78% in the three month period and decreased from 82% to
78% in the six month period due largely to the effect of
a decrease in retention in all lines of business and the
effect of written pricing decreases for workers
compensation business over the last nine months of 2008
and first three months of 2009. The decrease in premium
renewal retention has been largely driven by the decline
in the economy including the effects of increased
mid-term cancellations. |
|
|
|
Earned pricing
increase
(decrease)
|
|
For both the three and six month periods, earned
pricing increased for package business, decreased for
workers compensation and was relatively flat for
commercial auto business. As written premium is earned
over the 12-month term of the policies, the earned
pricing changes during the three and six month periods
ended June 30, 2009 were primarily a reflection of
written pricing changes over the last nine months of
2008 and the first three months of 2009. In addition to
the effect of written pricing decreases in workers
compensation, average premium per policy in Small
Commercial has declined due to a lower average premium
on Next Generation Auto business, a reduction in the
payrolls of workers compensation insureds and the
effect of declining mid-term endorsements. |
|
|
|
Policies in-force
|
|
While earned premium has decreased by 6% and 5%,
respectively, for the three and six month periods, the
number of policies in-force has remained relatively
flat, reflecting the decrease in average premium per
policy. The growth in policies in-force does not
correspond directly with the change in earned premiums
due to the effect of changes in earned pricing, changes
in the average premium per policy and because policy
in-force counts are as of a point in time rather than
over a period of time. |
117
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
Small Commercial Underwriting Summary |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
Change |
|
Written premiums |
|
$ |
643 |
|
|
$ |
679 |
|
|
|
(5 |
%) |
|
$ |
1,336 |
|
|
$ |
1,422 |
|
|
|
(6 |
%) |
Change in unearned premium reserve |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
52 |
|
|
|
(21 |
%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earned premiums |
|
|
643 |
|
|
|
683 |
|
|
|
(6 |
%) |
|
|
1,295 |
|
|
|
1,370 |
|
|
|
(5 |
%) |
Losses and loss adjustment expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current accident year before catastrophes |
|
|
340 |
|
|
|
380 |
|
|
|
(11 |
%) |
|
|
702 |
|
|
|
750 |
|
|
|
(6 |
%) |
Current accident year catastrophes |
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
(34 |
%) |
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
44 |
|
|
|
(34 |
%) |
Prior accident years |
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
NM |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
NM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total losses and loss adjustment expenses |
|
|
373 |
|
|
|
413 |
|
|
|
(10 |
%) |
|
|
746 |
|
|
|
790 |
|
|
|
(6 |
%) |
Amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs |
|
|
155 |
|
|
|
159 |
|
|
|
(3 |
%) |
|
|
312 |
|
|
|
318 |
|
|
|
(2 |
%) |
Insurance operating costs and expenses |
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
42 |
|
|
|
(2 |
%) |
|
|
76 |
|
|
|
74 |
|
|
|
3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Underwriting results |
|
$ |
74 |
|
|
$ |
69 |
|
|
|
7 |
% |
|
$ |
161 |
|
|
$ |
188 |
|
|
|
(14 |
%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss and loss adjustment expense ratio |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current accident year before catastrophes |
|
|
52.8 |
|
|
|
55.5 |
|
|
|
2.7 |
|
|
|
54.2 |
|
|
|
54.6 |
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
Current accident year catastrophes |
|
|
3.6 |
|
|
|
5.2 |
|
|
|
1.6 |
|
|
|
2.3 |
|
|
|
3.2 |
|
|
|
0.9 |
|
Prior accident years |
|
|
1.5 |
|
|
|
(0.3 |
) |
|
|
(1.8 |
) |
|
|
1.2 |
|
|
|
(0.3 |
) |
|
|
(1.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loss and loss adjustment expense ratio |
|
|
58.0 |
|
|
|
60.4 |
|
|
|
2.4 |
|
|
|
57.6 |
|
|
|
57.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
Expense ratio |
|
|
30.4 |
|
|
|
29.0 |
|
|
|
(1.4 |
) |
|
|
29.8 |
|
|
|
28.3 |
|
|
|
(1.5 |
) |
Policyholder dividend ratio |
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Combined ratio |
|
|
88.6 |
|
|
|
89.8 |
|
|
|
1.2 |
|
|
|
87.6 |
|
|
|
86.2 |
|
|
|
(1.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Catastrophe ratio |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current year |
|
|
3.6 |
|
|
|
5.2 |
|
|
|
1.6 |
|
|
|
2.3 |
|
|
|
3.2 |
|
|
|
0.9 |
|
Prior years |
|
|
(0.3 |
) |
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total catastrophe ratio |
|
|
3.3 |
|
|
|
5.3 |
|
|
|
2.0 |
|
|
|
2.2 |
|
|
|
3.3 |
|
|
|
1.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Combined ratio before catastrophes |
|
|
85.3 |
|
|
|
84.5 |
|
|
|
(0.8 |
) |
|
|
85.4 |
|
|
|
82.9 |
|
|
|
(2.5 |
) |
Combined ratio before catastrophes and prior
accident years development |
|
|
83.4 |
|
|
|
84.9 |
|
|
|
1.5 |
|
|
|
84.1 |
|
|
|
83.3 |
|
|
|
(0.8 |
) |
Underwriting results and ratios
Three months ended June 30, 2009 compared to the three months ended June 30, 2008
Underwriting results increased by $5, from $69 to $74, with a corresponding 1.2 point decrease in
the combined ratio, from 89.8 to 88.6, due to:
|
|
|
|
|
Change in underwriting results |
|
|
|
|
Decrease in earned premiums |
|
$ |
(40 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Losses and loss adjustment expenses |
|
|
|
|
Volume change Decrease in current accident year losses and loss adjustment expenses before
catastrophes due to the decrease in earned premium |
|
|
23 |
|
Ratio change A decrease in the current accident loss and loss adjustment expense ratio
before catastrophes |
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
|
|
Net decrease in current accident year losses and loss adjustment expenses before catastrophes |
|
|
40 |
|
Catastrophes Decrease in current accident year catastrophes |
|
|
12 |
|
Reserve changes A change from net favorable to net unfavorable prior accident year reserve
development |
|
|
(12 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Net decrease in losses and loss adjustment expenses |
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses |
|
|
|
|
Decrease in amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs |
|
|
4 |
|
Decrease in insurance operating costs and expenses |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
Decrease in operating expenses |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase in underwriting results from 2008 to 2009 |
|
$ |
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
118
Earned premium decreased by $40
For the three months ended June 30, 2009, earned premiums for the Small Commercial segment
decreased by $40, to $643. Refer to the Earned Premium section above for discussion.
Losses and loss adjustment expenses decreased by $40
Current accident year losses and loss adjustment expenses before catastrophes decreased by
$40
Small Commercials current accident year losses and loss adjustment expenses before catastrophes
decreased by $40 in 2009, to $340, primarily due to the decrease in earned premium and a 2.7 point
decrease in the current accident year loss and loss adjustment expense ratio before catastrophes,
to 52.8. The decrease in this ratio was primarily due to lower loss and loss adjustment expense
ratio on package business, driven by lower claim frequency.
Current accident year catastrophes decreased by $12
Current accident year catastrophe losses of $23, or 3.6 points, in 2009 were lower than current
accident year catastrophe losses of $35, or 5.2 points, in 2008, as losses from windstorms and
tornadoes in the Midwest in 2009 were lower than losses from tornadoes and thunderstorms in the
South and Midwest in 2008.
A $12 change to net unfavorable prior accident year reserve development
Net unfavorable prior accident year development of $10 in 2009 included a $20 strengthening of
reserves for package business related to accident years 2007 and 2008. While net favorable prior
accident years development was only $2 in 2008, reserve development included an $18 release of
workers compensation reserves related to accident years 2000 to 2007, largely offset by a $10
strengthening of reserves for claims under Small Commercial package policies related to accident
year 2007.
Operating expense decreased by $5
The $4 decrease in amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs was primarily driven by the
decrease in earned premium. The expense ratio increased by 1.4 points, to 30.4, in 2009, primarily
due to the decrease in earned premium.
Six months ended June 30, 2009 compared to the six months ended June 30, 2008
Underwriting results decreased by $27, from $188 to $161, with a corresponding 1.4 point increase
in the combined ratio, from 86.2 to 87.6, due to:
|
|
|
|
|
Change in underwriting results |
|
|
|
|
Decrease in earned premiums |
|
$ |
(75 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Losses and loss adjustment expenses |
|
|
|
|
Volume change Decrease in current accident year losses and loss adjustment expenses before
catastrophes due to the decrease in earned premium |
|
|
41 |
|
Ratio change A decrease in the current accident loss and loss adjustment expense ratio
before catastrophes |
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
Net decrease in current accident year losses and loss adjustment expenses before catastrophes |
|
|
48 |
|
Catastrophes Decrease in current accident year catastrophes |
|
|
15 |
|
Reserve changes A change from net favorable to net unfavorable prior accident year reserve
development |
|
|
(19 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Net decrease in losses and loss adjustment expenses |
|
|
44 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses |
|
|
|
|
Decrease in amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs |
|
|
6 |
|
Increase in insurance operating costs and expenses |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Decrease in operating expenses |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Decrease in underwriting results from 2008 to 2009 |
|
$ |
(27 |
) |
|
|
|
|
119
Earned premium decreased by $75
For the six months ended June 30, 2009, earned premiums for the Small Commercial segment decreased
by $75, to $1,295. Refer to the Earned Premium section above for discussion.
Losses and loss adjustment expenses decreased by $44
Current accident year losses and loss adjustment expenses before catastrophes decreased by
$48
Small Commercials current accident year losses and loss adjustment expenses before catastrophes
decreased by $48 in 2009, to $702, primarily due to the decrease in earned premium and a decrease
in the current accident year loss and loss adjustment expense ratio before catastrophes. The
decrease in this ratio was primarily due to a lower loss and loss adjustment expense ratio on
workers compensation business, reflecting a continuation of favorable expected frequency,
partially offset by the effect of earned pricing declines and the effect of a 2009 decrease in
estimated audit premium related to exposures earned in 2008.
Current accident year catastrophes decreased by $15
Current accident year catastrophe losses of $29, or 2.3 points, in 2009 were lower than current
accident year catastrophe losses of $44, or 3.2 points, in 2008, as losses from tornadoes and
thunderstorms were lower in 2009 than in 2008.
A $19 change to net unfavorable prior accident year reserve development
Net unfavorable prior accident year development of $15 in 2009 included $36 of strengthening of
reserves for package business, partially offset by a $13 release of workers compensation reserves
related to accident years 2003 to 2007. Net favorable prior accident year development of $4 in
2008 included a $39 release of workers compensation reserves related to accident years 2000 to
2007, largely offset by a $17 strengthening of reserves for general liability and products
liability claims primarily for accident years 2004 and prior and $10 strengthening of reserves for
claims under package policies related to accident year 2007.
Operating expense decreased by $4
The decrease in amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs was driven by the decrease in
earned premium, partially offset by higher amortization of other underwriting expenses. The
expense ratio increased by 1.5 points, to 29.8, in 2009, primarily due to the decrease in earned
premium and the increase in insurance operating costs and expenses. Insurance operating costs and
expenses increased by $2, largely due to a decrease in estimated contingent commissions in 2008
related to 2007 agent compensation and higher IT costs in 2009, partially offset by a $5, or 0.7
point, reduction in TWIA assessments related to hurricane Ike.
120
MIDDLE MARKET
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
Premiums [1] |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
Change |
|
Written premiums |
|
$ |
482 |
|
|
$ |
529 |
|
|
|
(9 |
%) |
|
$ |
1,008 |
|
|
$ |
1,094 |
|
|
|
(8 |
%) |
Earned premiums |
|
|
538 |
|
|
|
575 |
|
|
|
(6 |
%) |
|
|
1,086 |
|
|
|
1,168 |
|
|
|
(7 |
%) |
|
|
|
[1] |
|
The difference between written premiums and earned premiums is attributable to the change in unearned premium reserve. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Premium Measures |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
New business premium |
|
$ |
106 |
|
|
$ |
101 |
|
|
$ |
221 |
|
|
$ |
206 |
|
Premium renewal retention |
|
|
71 |
% |
|
|
77 |
% |
|
|
73 |
% |
|
|
78 |
% |
Written pricing decrease |
|
|
(1 |
%) |
|
|
(7 |
%) |
|
|
(2 |
%) |
|
|
(6 |
%) |
Earned pricing decrease |
|
|
(5 |
%) |
|
|
(6 |
%) |
|
|
(5 |
%) |
|
|
(5 |
%) |
Policies in-force end of period |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
96,574 |
|
|
|
96,602 |
|
Earned Premiums
Three and six months ended June 30, 2009 compared to the three and six months ended June 30, 2008
Earned premiums for the Middle Market segment decreased by $37, or 6%, for the three months ended
June 30, 2009 and decreased by $82, or 7%, for the six months ended June 30, 2009. For both
periods, the decrease was primarily driven by decreases in general liability and commercial auto
due to earned pricing decreases and the effect of a decline in new business and premium renewal
retention over the last nine months of 2008 and first three months of 2009. Middle Market workers
compensation earned premium increased modestly as the effect of an increase in new business written
premium over the last nine months of 2008 and first three months of 2009 was partially offset by
lower earned audit premium.
|
|
|
New business
premium
|
|
New business written premium increased by $5, or
5%, to $106 in the second quarter of 2009 and increased
by $15, or 7%, to $221 in the first six months of 2009.
An increase in new business written premium for workers
compensation was partially offset by a decrease in new
business for marine, commercial auto and general
liability. The Company has increased new business for
workers compensation by targeting business in selected
industries and regions of the country where attractive
new business opportunities remain, despite continued
price competition and state-mandated rate reductions.
In the first two months of the second quarter of 2009,
the Companys new business was negatively affected by
uncertainty in the marketplace regarding The Hartford,
particularly for larger accounts, but new business
improved significantly in the month of June for both
smaller and larger accounts after the Company reaffirmed
its focus on its core domestic Property & Casualty and
Life businesses and the Companys ratings stabilized. |
|
|
|
Premium renewal
retention
|
|
Premium renewal retention decreased from 77% to
71% for the three month period and decreased from 78% to
73% for the six month period due largely to a decrease
in retention of workers compensation, general liability
and commercial auto and, for the six-month period, a
decrease in property. The Company continued to take
actions to secure renewals in the first six months of
2009, including the use of reduced pricing on targeted
accounts, particularly on workers compensation
business. Nevertheless, premium renewal retention
declined due to the effects of the downturn in the
economy, particularly in Marine construction lines, and
the Companys decision not to reduce its pricing in many
lines, including property, auto and general liability
business. Premium renewal retention was also lower for
workers compensation business due to the effect of
lower audit premium decreasing average premium per
policy. As was the case with new business, in the first
two months of the second quarter of 2009, renewal
retention was negatively affected by uncertainty in the
marketplace regarding The Hartford, particularly for
larger accounts, but renewal retention improved
significantly in the month of June after the Company
reaffirmed its focus on its core domestic Property &
Casualty and Life businesses and the Companys ratings
stabilized. |
|
|
|
Earned pricing
decrease
|
|
Earned pricing decreased in all lines of
business, including workers compensation, commercial
auto, general liability, property and marine. As
written premium is earned over the 12-month term of the
policies, the earned pricing changes during the second
quarter of 2009 were primarily a reflection of written
pricing decreases over the last nine months of 2008 and
the first three months of 2009. A number of carriers
have continued to compete fairly aggressively on price,
particularly on larger accounts within Middle Market.
In the second quarter of 2009, however, written pricing
decreases moderated for workers compensation,
general liability and marine and were flat or slightly positive for
property and commercial auto. |
|
|
|
Policies in-force
|
|
While the number of policies in-force remained
relatively flat from June 30, 2008 to June 30, 2009,
earned premium declined due to the reduction in the
average premium per policy. |
121
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
Middle Market Underwriting Summary |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
Change |
|
Written premiums |
|
$ |
482 |
|
|
$ |
529 |
|
|
|
(9 |
%) |
|
$ |
1,008 |
|
|
$ |
1,094 |
|
|
|
(8 |
%) |
Change in unearned premium reserve |
|
|
(56 |
) |
|
|
(46 |
) |
|
|
(22 |
%) |
|
|
(78 |
) |
|
|
(74 |
) |
|
|
(5 |
%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earned premiums |
|
|
538 |
|
|
|
575 |
|
|
|
(6 |
%) |
|
|
1,086 |
|
|
|
1,168 |
|
|
|
(7 |
%) |
Losses and loss adjustment expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current accident year before catastrophes |
|
|
331 |
|
|
|
377 |
|
|
|
(12 |
%) |
|
|
690 |
|
|
|
757 |
|
|
|
(9 |
%) |
Current accident year catastrophes |
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
(76 |
%) |
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
42 |
|
|
|
(43 |
%) |
Prior accident years |
|
|
(22 |
) |
|
|
(21 |
) |
|
|
(5 |
%) |
|
|
(80 |
) |
|
|
(37 |
) |
|
|
(116 |
%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total losses and loss adjustment expenses |
|
|
317 |
|
|
|
389 |
|
|
|
(19 |
%) |
|
|
634 |
|
|
|
762 |
|
|
|
(17 |
%) |
Amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs |
|
|
123 |
|
|
|
129 |
|
|
|
(5 |
%) |
|
|
248 |
|
|
|
258 |
|
|
|
(4 |
%) |
Insurance operating costs and expenses |
|
|
42 |
|
|
|
54 |
|
|
|
(22 |
%) |
|
|
79 |
|
|
|
90 |
|
|
|
(12 |
%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Underwriting results |
|
$ |
56 |
|
|
$ |
3 |
|
|
|
NM |
|
|
$ |
125 |
|
|
$ |
58 |
|
|
|
116 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss and loss adjustment expense ratio |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current accident year before catastrophes |
|
|
61.6 |
|
|
|
65.7 |
|
|
|
4.1 |
|
|
|
63.6 |
|
|
|
64.9 |
|
|
|
1.3 |
|
Current accident year catastrophes |
|
|
1.6 |
|
|
|
5.7 |
|
|
|
4.1 |
|
|
|
2.2 |
|
|
|
3.6 |
|
|
|
1.4 |
|
Prior accident years |
|
|
(4.2 |
) |
|
|
(3.7 |
) |
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
(7.4 |
) |
|
|
(3.2 |
) |
|
|
4.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loss and loss adjustment expense ratio |
|
|
59.1 |
|
|
|
67.7 |
|
|
|
8.6 |
|
|
|
58.4 |
|
|
|
65.3 |
|
|
|
6.9 |
|
Expense ratio |
|
|
29.8 |
|
|
|
29.4 |
|
|
|
(0.4 |
) |
|
|
29.5 |
|
|
|
28.5 |
|
|
|
(1.0 |
) |
Policyholder dividend ratio |
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
2.3 |
|
|
|
1.7 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
1.3 |
|
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Combined ratio |
|
|
89.5 |
|
|
|
99.4 |
|
|
|
9.9 |
|
|
|
88.5 |
|
|
|
95.0 |
|
|
|
6.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Catastrophe ratio |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current year |
|
|
1.6 |
|
|
|
5.7 |
|
|
|
4.1 |
|
|
|
2.2 |
|
|
|
3.6 |
|
|
|
1.4 |
|
Prior years |
|
|
(0.8 |
) |
|
|
(0.4 |
) |
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
(0.9 |
) |
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total catastrophe ratio |
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
|
5.3 |
|
|
|
4.5 |
|
|
|
1.3 |
|
|
|
3.5 |
|
|
|
2.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Combined ratio before catastrophes |
|
|
88.7 |
|
|
|
94.1 |
|
|
|
5.4 |
|
|
|
87.2 |
|
|
|
91.5 |
|
|
|
4.3 |
|
Combined ratio before catastrophes and prior
accident years development |
|
|
92.1 |
|
|
|
97.4 |
|
|
|
5.3 |
|
|
|
93.7 |
|
|
|
94.6 |
|
|
|
0.9 |
|
Underwriting results and ratios
Three months ended June 30, 2009 compared to the three months ended June 30, 2008
Underwriting results increased by $53, from $3 to $56 with a corresponding 9.9 point decrease in
the combined ratio, from 99.4 to 89.5 due to:
|
|
|
|
|
Change in underwriting results |
|
|
|
|
Decrease in earned premiums |
|
$ |
(37 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Losses and loss adjustment expenses |
|
|
|
|
Volume change Decrease in current accident year loss and loss adjustment expenses before
catastrophes due to the decrease in earned premium |
|
|
25 |
|
Ratio change A decrease in the current accident year loss and loss adjustment expense ratio
before catastrophes |
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
|
|
Net decrease in current accident year losses and loss adjustment expenses before catastrophes |
|
|
46 |
|
Catastrophes Decrease in current accident year catastrophes |
|
|
25 |
|
Reserve changes An increase in net favorable prior accident year reserve development |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
Net decrease in losses and loss adjustment expenses |
|
|
72 |
|
Operating expenses |
|
|
|
|
Decrease in amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs |
|
|
6 |
|
Decrease in insurance operating costs and expenses |
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
|
|
Net decrease in operating expenses |
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase in underwriting results from 2008 to 2009 |
|
$ |
53 |
|
|
|
|
|
122
Earned premium decreased by $37
Earned premiums for the Middle Market segment decreased by $37, or 6%, driven primarily by
decreases in general liability and commercial auto. Refer to the Earned Premium section for
further discussion.
Losses and loss adjustment expenses decreased by $72
Current accident year losses and loss adjustment expenses before catastrophes decreased by
$46
Middle Market current accident year losses and loss adjustment expenses before catastrophes
decreased by $46, primarily due to a decrease in earned premium and a decrease in the current
accident year loss and loss adjustment expense ratio before catastrophes. Before catastrophes, the
current accident year loss and loss adjustment expense ratio decreased by 4.1 points, to 61.6,
primarily due to lower non-catastrophe losses on property business, driven by favorable claim
severity, partially offset by a higher loss and loss adjustment expense ratio on workers
compensation and livestock business.
Current accident year catastrophes decreased by $25
Current accident year catastrophe losses of $8, or 1.6 points, in 2009 were lower than current
accident year catastrophe losses of $33, or 5.7 points, in 2008, as losses from windstorms and
tornadoes across the Midwest in 2009 were lower than losses from tornadoes and thunderstorms in the
South and Midwest in 2008.
A $1 increase in net favorable prior accident year reserve development
Net favorable reserve development of $22 in 2009 included a $33 release of general liability
reserves, primarily related to accident years 2004 to 2007. Net favorable reserve development of
$21 in 2008 included a $23 release of reserves for high hazard and umbrella general liability
claims, primarily related to the 2001 to 2006 accident years.
Operating expenses decreased by $18
Insurance operating costs and expenses decreased by $12, primarily due to an $11 increase in the
estimated amount of dividends payable to certain workers compensation policyholders due to
underwriting profits recognized in the second quarter of 2008. The decrease in the amortization of
deferred policy acquisition costs was largely due to the decrease in earned premium. The expense
ratio increased 0.4 points, to 29.8 in 2009, as insurance operating costs and expenses other than
policyholders dividends did not decrease commensurate with the decrease in earned premium.
Six months ended June 30, 2009 compared to the six months ended June 30, 2008
Underwriting results increased by $67, from $58 to $125, with a corresponding 6.5 point decrease in
the combined ratio, from 95.0 to 88.5, due to:
|
|
|
|
|
Change in underwriting results |
|
|
|
|
Decrease in earned premiums |
|
$ |
(82 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Losses and loss adjustment expenses |
|
|
|
|
Volume change Decrease in current accident year loss and loss adjustment expenses before
catastrophes due to the decrease in earned premium |
|
|
53 |
|
Ratio change A decrease in the current accident year loss and loss adjustment expense ratio
before catastrophes |
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
|
|
Net decrease in current accident year losses and loss adjustment expenses before catastrophes |
|
|
67 |
|
Catastrophes Decrease in current accident year catastrophes |
|
|
18 |
|
Reserve changes An increase in net favorable prior accident year reserve development |
|
|
43 |
|
|
|
|
|
Net decrease in losses and loss adjustment expenses |
|
|
128 |
|
Operating expenses |
|
|
|
|
Decrease in amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs |
|
|
10 |
|
Decrease in insurance operating costs and expenses |
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
|
|
Net decrease in operating expenses |
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase in underwriting results from 2008 to 2009 |
|
$ |
67 |
|
|
|
|
|
123
Earned premium decreased by $82
Earned premiums for the Middle Market segment decreased by $82, or 7%, driven primarily by
decreases in general liability and commercial auto. Refer to the Earned Premium section for
further discussion.
Losses and loss adjustment expenses decreased by $128
Current accident year losses and loss adjustment expenses before catastrophes decreased by
$67
Middle Market current accident year losses and loss adjustment expenses before catastrophes
decreased by $67, primarily due to a decrease in earned premium and a decrease in the current
accident year loss and loss adjustment expense ratio before catastrophes. Before catastrophes, the
current accident year loss and loss adjustment expense ratio decreased by 1.3 points, to 63.6,
primarily due to lower non-catastrophe losses on property business, driven by favorable claim
severity, partially offset by a higher loss and loss adjustment expense ratio on workers
compensation and general liability business. The higher loss and loss adjustment expense ratio on
workers compensation and general liability business was partially due to the effect of a 2008
increase in estimated audit premium related to exposures earned in 2007, which reduced the loss and
loss adjustment expense ratio in 2008.
Current accident year catastrophes decreased by $18
Current accident year catastrophe losses of $24, or 2.2 points, in 2009 were lower than current
accident year catastrophe losses of $42, or 3.6 points, in 2008, as losses from ice storms,
windstorms and tornadoes across many states in 2009 were lower than losses from tornadoes and
thunderstorms in the South and Midwest in 2008.
A $43 increase in net favorable prior accident year reserve development
Net favorable prior accident year reserve development increased by $43, from $37, or 3.2 points, in
2008 to $80, or 7.4 points, in 2009. Net favorable reserve development of $80 in 2009 included
general liability reserve releases of $71, primarily related to accident years 2004 to 2007. Net
favorable reserve development of $37 in 2008 included a $37 release of reserves for high hazard and
umbrella general liability claims, primarily related to the 2001 to 2006 accident years and a $19
release of workers compensation reserves, partially offset by a $30 strengthening of reserves for
general liability and products liability claims primarily related to accident years 2004 and prior.
Operating expenses decreased by $21
Insurance operating costs and expenses decreased by $11, primarily due to an $11 increase in the
estimated amount of dividends payable to certain workers compensation policyholders due to
underwriting profits in 2008. The decrease in the amortization of deferred policy acquisition
costs was largely due to the decrease in earned premium, partially offset by an increase in
amortization of other underwriting expenses. The expense ratio increased 1.0 point, to 29.5 in
2009, as insurance operating costs and expenses other than policyholders dividends did not decrease
commensurate with the decrease in earned premium.
124
SPECIALTY COMMERCIAL
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
Change |
|
Written Premiums [1] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
14 |
|
|
|
(100 |
%) |
|
$ |
(16 |
) |
|
$ |
21 |
|
|
|
NM |
|
Casualty |
|
|
128 |
|
|
|
135 |
|
|
|
(5 |
%) |
|
|
278 |
|
|
|
294 |
|
|
|
(5 |
%) |
Professional liability, fidelity and surety |
|
|
148 |
|
|
|
176 |
|
|
|
(16 |
%) |
|
|
291 |
|
|
|
328 |
|
|
|
(11 |
%) |
Other |
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
(24 |
%) |
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
43 |
|
|
|
(21 |
%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
292 |
|
|
$ |
346 |
|
|
|
(16 |
%) |
|
$ |
587 |
|
|
$ |
686 |
|
|
|
(14 |
%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earned Premiums [1] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property |
|
$ |
3 |
|
|
$ |
24 |
|
|
|
(88 |
%) |
|
$ |
16 |
|
|
$ |
51 |
|
|
|
(69 |
%) |
Casualty |
|
|
124 |
|
|
|
132 |
|
|
|
(6 |
%) |
|
|
254 |
|
|
|
264 |
|
|
|
(4 |
%) |
Professional liability, fidelity and surety |
|
|
165 |
|
|
|
169 |
|
|
|
(2 |
%) |
|
|
336 |
|
|
|
339 |
|
|
|
(1 |
%) |
Other |
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
(10 |
%) |
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
42 |
|
|
|
(12 |
%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
311 |
|
|
$ |
346 |
|
|
|
(10 |
%) |
|
$ |
643 |
|
|
$ |
696 |
|
|
|
(8 |
%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1] |
|
The difference between written premiums and earned premiums is attributable to the change in unearned premium reserve. |
Earned premiums
Three and six months ended June 30, 2009 compared to the three and six months ended June 30, 2008
Earned premiums for the Specialty Commercial segment decreased by $35, or 10%, for the three month
period and by $53, or 8%, for the six month period, primarily due to a decrease in property earned
premiums.
|
|
Property earned premiums decreased by $21, or 88%, for the three month period and by $35,
or 69%, for the six month period, primarily due to the sale of the Companys core excess and
surplus lines property business. Effective March 31, 2009, the Company sold its core excess
and surplus lines property business, to Beazley Group PLC. Concurrent with the sale, the
in-force book of business was ceded to Beazley under a separate reinsurance agreement, whereby
the Company ceded $26 of unearned premium, net of $10 in ceding commission. The ceding of the
unearned premium was reflected as a reduction of written premium in the six months ended June
30, 2009. |
|
|
Casualty earned premiums decreased by $8, or 6%, and by $10, or 4%, respectively, for the
three and six month periods, primarily because of earned pricing decreases and a decrease in
insured exposures on specialty construction accounts. |
|
|
Professional liability, fidelity and surety earned premium decreased slightly as the
effects of lower new business and renewal retention and earned pricing decreases were largely
offset by a decrease in the portion of professional liability risks ceded to outside
reinsurers. The adverse impact of recent ratings downgrades contributed to a decline in new
business and renewal retention in the first six months of 2009. |
|
|
Within the Other category, earned premium decreased by $2, or 10%, and by $5, or 12%,
respectively, for the three and six month periods. The Other category of earned premiums
includes premiums assumed under inter-segment arrangements. |
125
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
Specialty Commercial Underwriting Summary |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
Change |
|
Written premiums |
|
$ |
292 |
|
|
$ |
346 |
|
|
|
(16 |
%) |
|
$ |
587 |
|
|
$ |
686 |
|
|
|
(14 |
%) |
Change in unearned premium reserve |
|
|
(19 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(56 |
) |
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
NM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earned premiums |
|
|
311 |
|
|
|
346 |
|
|
|
(10 |
%) |
|
|
643 |
|
|
|
696 |
|
|
|
(8 |
%) |
Losses and loss adjustment expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current accident year before catastrophes |
|
|
214 |
|
|
|
237 |
|
|
|
(10 |
%) |
|
|
447 |
|
|
|
477 |
|
|
|
(6 |
%) |
Current accident year catastrophes |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
(83 |
%) |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
(75 |
%) |
Prior accident years |
|
|
(47 |
) |
|
|
(17 |
) |
|
|
(176 |
%) |
|
|
(72 |
) |
|
|
(42 |
) |
|
|
(71 |
%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total losses and loss adjustment expenses |
|
|
168 |
|
|
|
226 |
|
|
|
(26 |
%) |
|
|
377 |
|
|
|
443 |
|
|
|
(15 |
%) |
Amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs |
|
|
72 |
|
|
|
78 |
|
|
|
(8 |
%) |
|
|
147 |
|
|
|
157 |
|
|
|
(6 |
%) |
Insurance operating costs and expenses |
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
46 |
% |
|
|
60 |
|
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
54 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Underwriting results |
|
$ |
36 |
|
|
$ |
18 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
$ |
59 |
|
|
$ |
57 |
|
|
|
4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss and loss adjustment expense ratio |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current accident year before catastrophes |
|
|
68.7 |
|
|
|
68.4 |
|
|
|
(0.3 |
) |
|
|
69.5 |
|
|
|
68.6 |
|
|
|
(0.9 |
) |
Current accident year catastrophes |
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
1.9 |
|
|
|
1.6 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
1.1 |
|
|
|
0.9 |
|
Prior accident years |
|
|
(15.0 |
) |
|
|
(4.6 |
) |
|
|
10.4 |
|
|
|
(11.3 |
) |
|
|
(5.9 |
) |
|
|
5.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loss and loss adjustment expense ratio |
|
|
54.0 |
|
|
|
65.7 |
|
|
|
11.7 |
|
|
|
58.4 |
|
|
|
63.7 |
|
|
|
5.3 |
|
Expense ratio |
|
|
34.5 |
|
|
|
28.4 |
|
|
|
(6.1 |
) |
|
|
31.9 |
|
|
|
27.4 |
|
|
|
(4.5 |
) |
Policyholder dividend ratio |
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
1.1 |
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Combined ratio |
|
|
88.7 |
|
|
|
95.2 |
|
|
|
6.5 |
|
|
|
90.8 |
|
|
|
91.9 |
|
|
|
1.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Catastrophe ratio |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current year |
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
1.9 |
|
|
|
1.6 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
1.1 |
|
|
|
0.9 |
|
Prior years |
|
|
(1.7 |
) |
|
|
(0.5 |
) |
|
|
1.2 |
|
|
|
(1.0 |
) |
|
|
(1.2 |
) |
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total catastrophe ratio |
|
|
(1.4 |
) |
|
|
1.4 |
|
|
|
2.8 |
|
|
|
(0.7 |
) |
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Combined ratio before catastrophes |
|
|
90.1 |
|
|
|
93.8 |
|
|
|
3.7 |
|
|
|
91.5 |
|
|
|
92.0 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
Combined ratio before catastrophes and prior
accident years development |
|
|
103.4 |
|
|
|
97.9 |
|
|
|
(5.5 |
) |
|
|
101.9 |
|
|
|
96.7 |
|
|
|
(5.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other revenues [1] |
|
$ |
86 |
|
|
$ |
96 |
|
|
|
(10 |
%) |
|
$ |
166 |
|
|
$ |
182 |
|
|
|
(9 |
%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1] |
|
Represents servicing revenue. |
Underwriting results and ratios
Three months ended June 30, 2009 compared to the three months ended June 30, 2008
Underwriting results increased by $18, from $18 to $36, with a corresponding 6.5 point decrease in
the combined ratio, to 88.7, due to:
|
|
|
|
|
Change in underwriting results |
|
|
|
|
Decrease in earned premiums |
|
$ |
(35 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Losses and loss adjustment expenses |
|
|
|
|
Volume change Decrease in the current accident year loss and loss adjustment expenses before
catastrophes due to the decrease in earned premium |
|
|
24 |
|
Ratio change An increase in the current accident year loss and loss adjustment expense ratio
before catastrophes |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Net decrease in current accident year losses and loss adjustment expenses before catastrophes |
|
|
23 |
|
Catastrophes Decrease in current accident year catastrophe losses |
|
|
5 |
|
Reserve changes Increase in net favorable prior accident year reserve development |
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
|
|
Net decrease in losses and loss adjustment expenses |
|
|
58 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses |
|
|
|
|
Decrease in amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs |
|
|
6 |
|
Increase in insurance operating costs and expenses |
|
|
(11 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Net increase in operating expenses |
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase in underwriting results from 2008 to 2009 |
|
$ |
18 |
|
|
|
|
|
126
Earned premiums decreased by $35
Earned premiums for the Specialty Commercial segment decreased by $35, or 10%, primarily due to a
decrease in property earned premiums. Refer to the Earned Premiums section above for further
discussion.
Losses and loss adjustment expenses decreased by $58
Current accident year losses and loss adjustment expenses before catastrophes decreased by
$23
Specialty Commercial current accident year losses and loss adjustment expenses before catastrophes
decreased by $23 in 2009, to $214, primarily due to a decrease in earned premium.
Net favorable prior accident year development increased by $30
Net favorable prior accident year reserve development of $47 in 2009 included a $30 release of
reserves for D&O insurance claims related to accident years 2003 to 2007 and a $20 release of
reserves for uncollectible reinsurance. Net favorable prior accident year reserve development of
$17 in 2008 included a $10 release of reserves for D&O insurance and E&O insurance for the 2004 to
2006 accident years.
Operating expenses increased by $5
Insurance operating costs and expenses increased by $11, primarily due to a $23 increase in taxes,
licenses and fees due to a $6 increase in the assessment for a second injury fund and $17 reserve
strengthening for other state funds and taxes, partially offset by decreases in policyholder
dividends and compensation-related costs. Amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs
decreased by $6 primarily due to the decrease in earned premium. The expense ratio increased by
6.1 points, to 34.5, due to the decrease in earned premium and the increase in insurance operating
costs and expenses.
Six months ended June 30, 2009 compared to the six months ended June 30, 2008
Underwriting results increased by $2, from $57 to $59, with a corresponding 1.1 point decrease in
the combined ratio, to 90.8, due to:
|
|
|
|
|
Change in underwriting results |
|
|
|
|
Decrease in earned premiums |
|
$ |
(53 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Losses and loss adjustment expenses |
|
|
|
|
Volume change Decrease in current accident year loss and loss adjustment expenses before
catastrophes due to the decrease in earned premium |
|
|
38 |
|
Ratio change An increase in the current accident year loss and loss adjustment expense ratio
before catastrophes |
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Net decrease in current accident year losses and loss adjustment expenses before catastrophes |
|
|
30 |
|
Catastrophes Decrease in current accident year catastrophe losses |
|
|
6 |
|
Reserve changes Increase in net favorable prior accident years reserve development |
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
|
|
Net decrease in losses and loss adjustment expenses |
|
|
66 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses |
|
|
|
|
Decrease in amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs |
|
|
10 |
|
Increase in insurance operating costs and expenses |
|
|
(21 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Net increase in operating expenses |
|
|
(11 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase in underwriting results from 2008 to 2009 |
|
$ |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
127
Earned premiums decreased by $53
Earned premiums for the Specialty Commercial segment decreased by $53, or 8%, primarily due to a
decrease in property earned premiums. Refer to the Earned Premiums section above for further
discussion.
Losses and loss adjustment expenses decreased by $66
Current accident year losses and loss adjustment expenses before catastrophes decreased by
$30
Specialty Commercial current accident year losses and loss adjustment expenses before catastrophes
decreased by $30 in 2009, to $447, primarily due to a decrease in earned premium, partially offset
by an increase in the loss and loss adjustment expense ratio before catastrophes and prior accident
year reserve development. The loss and loss adjustment expense ratio before catastrophes and prior
accident year reserve development increased by 0.9 points, to 69.5, primarily due to a higher loss
and loss adjustment ratio on directors and officers insurance and specialty casualty business,
driven largely by earned pricing decreases.
Net favorable prior accident year reserve development increased by $30
Net favorable prior accident year reserve development of $72 in 2009 included, among other reserve
changes, releases of reserves for directors and officers insurance claims of $50 and a $20
release of reserves for uncollectible reinsurance. Net favorable prior accident year reserve
development of $42 in 2008 included a $20 release of reserves for D&O insurance and E&O insurance
claims related to accident years 2003 to 2006 and a $10 release of reserves for construction defect
claims related to accident years 2001 and prior.
Operating expenses increased by $11
Insurance operating costs and expenses increased by $21, primarily due to a $23 increase in taxes,
licenses and fees due to a $6 increase in the assessment for a second injury fund and $17 reserve
strengthening for other state funds and taxes. The expense ratio increased by 4.5 points, to 31.9,
primarily due to the decrease in earned premium and the increase in insurance operating costs and
expenses. Amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs decreased by $10 due to the decrease
in earned premium.
128
OTHER OPERATIONS (INCLUDING ASBESTOS AND ENVIRONMENTAL CLAIMS)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
Operating Summary |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
Change |
|
Written premiums |
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
$ |
2 |
|
|
|
(50 |
%) |
|
$ |
2 |
|
|
$ |
4 |
|
|
|
(50 |
%) |
Change in unearned premium reserve |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earned premiums |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
(50 |
%) |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
(67 |
%) |
Losses and loss adjustment expenses prior years |
|
|
121 |
|
|
|
55 |
|
|
|
120 |
% |
|
|
121 |
|
|
|
70 |
|
|
|
73 |
% |
Insurance operating costs and expenses |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
(20 |
%) |
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
(10 |
%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Underwriting results |
|
|
(124 |
) |
|
|
(58 |
) |
|
|
(114 |
%) |
|
|
(129 |
) |
|
|
(77 |
) |
|
|
(68 |
%) |
Net investment income |
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
57 |
|
|
|
(28 |
%) |
|
|
81 |
|
|
|
112 |
|
|
|
(28 |
%) |
Net realized capital losses |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(32 |
) |
|
|
(16 |
) |
|
|
(100 |
%) |
Other expenses |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
NM |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
50 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes |
|
|
(83 |
) |
|
|
1 |
|
|
NM |
|
|
|
(81 |
) |
|
|
17 |
|
|
NM |
|
Income tax benefit (expense) |
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
NM |
|
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
NM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
(49 |
) |
|
$ |
3 |
|
|
NM |
|
|
$ |
(48 |
) |
|
$ |
17 |
|
|
NM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended June 30, 2009 compared to the three months ended June 30, 2008
Net income for the three months ended June 30, 2009 decreased $52 compared to the prior year
period.
The decrease in Other Operations net income was driven primarily by the following:
|
|
A $66 decrease in underwriting results, primarily due to a $66 increase in unfavorable
prior year loss development. Reserve development in the three months ended June 30, 2009
included $138 of asbestos reserve strengthening as a result of the Companys annual asbestos
evaluation, partially offset by a decrease of $20 in the allowance for uncollectible
reinsurance as a result of the Companys annual evaluation of reinsurance recoverables. For
the comparable three month period ended June 30, 2008, reserve development included $50 of
asbestos reserve strengthening as a result of the Companys annual asbestos reserve
evaluation. |
|
|
A $16 decrease in net investment income, primarily as a result of a decrease in income on
fixed maturity investments driven by lower pre-tax yields and a decrease in the level of
invested assets. |
Partially offsetting the decrease in Other Operations net income were the following:
|
|
A $32 increase in income tax benefit, as a result of a change from net income to net loss. |
Six months ended June 30, 2009 compared to the six months ended June 30, 2008
Net income for the six months ended June 30, 2009 decreased $65 compared to the prior year period,
driven primarily by the following:
|
|
A $52 decrease in underwriting results, primarily due to a $51 increase in unfavorable
prior year loss development. Reserve development in the six months ended June 30, 2009
included $138 of asbestos reserve strengthening as a result of the Companys annual asbestos
reserve evaluation, partially offset by a decrease of $20 in the allowance for uncollectible
reinsurance as a result of the Companys annual evaluation of reinsurance recoverables. For
the comparable six month period ended June 30, 2008, reserve development included $50 of
asbestos reserve strengthening as a result of the Companys annual asbestos reserve
evaluation. |
|
|
A $31 decrease in net investment income, primarily as a result of a decrease in investment
yield for fixed maturities and a decrease in invested assets resulting from net losses and
loss adjustment expenses paid. |
Partially offsetting the decrease in Other Operations net income were the following:
|
|
A $33 increase in income tax benefit, as a result of the change from net income to net
loss. |
129
Asbestos and Environmental Claims
The Company continues to receive asbestos and environmental claims. Asbestos claims relate
primarily to bodily injuries asserted by people who came in contact with asbestos or products
containing asbestos. Environmental claims relate primarily to pollution and related clean-up
costs.
The Company wrote several different categories of insurance contracts that may cover asbestos and
environmental claims. First, the Company wrote primary policies providing the first layer of
coverage in an insureds liability program. Second, the Company wrote excess policies providing
higher layers of coverage for losses that exhaust the limits of underlying coverage. Third, the
Company acted as a reinsurer assuming a portion of those risks assumed by other insurers writing
primary, excess and reinsurance coverages. Fourth, subsidiaries of the Company participated in the
London Market, writing both direct insurance and assumed reinsurance business.
With regard to both environmental and particularly asbestos claims, significant uncertainty limits
the ability of insurers and reinsurers to estimate the ultimate reserves necessary for unpaid
losses and related expenses. Traditional actuarial reserving techniques cannot reasonably estimate
the ultimate cost of these claims, particularly during periods where theories of law are in flux.
The degree of variability of reserve estimates for these exposures is significantly greater than
for other more traditional exposures. In particular, the Company believes there is a high degree
of uncertainty inherent in the estimation of asbestos loss reserves. It is also not possible to
predict changes in the legal and legislative environment and their effect on the future development
of asbestos and environmental claims.
In the case of the reserves for asbestos exposures, factors contributing to the high degree of
uncertainty include inadequate loss development patterns, plaintiffs expanding theories of
liability, the risks inherent in major litigation, and inconsistent emerging legal doctrines.
Furthermore, over time, insurers, including the Company, have experienced significant changes in
the rate at which asbestos claims are brought, the claims experience of particular insureds, and
the value of claims, making predictions of future exposure from past experience uncertain.
Plaintiffs and insureds also have sought to use bankruptcy proceedings, including pre-packaged
bankruptcies, to accelerate and increase loss payments by insurers. In addition, some
policyholders have asserted new classes of claims for coverages to which an aggregate limit of
liability may not apply. Further uncertainties include insolvencies of other carriers and
unanticipated developments pertaining to the Companys ability to recover reinsurance for asbestos
and environmental claims. Management believes these issues are not likely to be resolved in the
near future.
In the case of the reserves for environmental exposures, factors contributing to the high degree of
uncertainty include expanding theories of liability and damages, the risks inherent in major
litigation, inconsistent decisions concerning the existence and scope of coverage for environmental
claims, and uncertainty as to the monetary amount being sought by the claimant from the insured.
The reporting pattern for assumed reinsurance claims, including those related to asbestos and
environmental claims, is much longer than for direct claims. In many instances, it takes months or
years to determine that the policyholders own obligations have been met and how the reinsurance in
question may apply to such claims. The delay in reporting reinsurance claims and exposures adds to
the uncertainty of estimating the related reserves.
Given the factors described above, the Company believes the actuarial tools and other techniques it
employs to estimate the ultimate cost of claims for more traditional kinds of insurance exposure
are less precise in estimating reserves for its asbestos and environmental exposures. For this
reason, the Company relies on exposure-based analysis to estimate the ultimate costs of these
claims and regularly evaluates new information in assessing its potential asbestos and
environmental exposures.
130
Reserve Activity
Reserves and reserve activity in the Other Operations segment are categorized and reported as
asbestos, environmental, or all other. The all other category of reserves covers a wide range
of insurance and assumed reinsurance coverages, including, but not limited to, potential liability
for construction defects, lead paint, silica, pharmaceutical products, molestation and other
long-tail liabilities. In addition, within the all other category of reserves, Other Operations
records its allowance for future reinsurer insolvencies and disputes that might affect reinsurance
collectability associated with asbestos, environmental, and other claims recoverable from
reinsurers.
The following table presents reserve activity, inclusive of estimates for both reported and
incurred but not reported claims, net of reinsurance, for Other Operations, categorized by
asbestos, environmental and all other claims, for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009.
Other Operations Losses and Loss Adjustment Expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months Ended June 30, 2009 |
|
Asbestos |
|
|
Environmental |
|
|
All Other [1] |
|
Total |
|
Beginning liability net [2][3] |
|
$ |
1,845 |
|
|
$ |
261 |
|
|
$ |
1,565 |
|
|
$ |
3,671 |
|
Losses and loss adjustment expenses incurred |
|
|
138 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(17 |
) |
|
|
121 |
|
Losses and loss adjustment expenses paid |
|
|
(37 |
) |
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
(27 |
) |
|
|
(71 |
) |
Reclassification of asbestos and environmental liabilities [4] |
|
|
51 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
(54 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending liability net [2][3] |
|
$ |
1,997 |
[5] |
|
$ |
257 |
|
|
$ |
1,467 |
|
|
$ |
3,721 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2009 |
|
Asbestos |
|
|
Environmental |
|
|
All Other [1] |
|
Total |
|
Beginning liability net [2][3] |
|
$ |
1,884 |
|
|
$ |
269 |
|
|
$ |
1,628 |
|
|
$ |
3,781 |
|
Losses and loss adjustment expenses incurred |
|
|
138 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(17 |
) |
|
|
121 |
|
Losses and loss adjustment expenses paid |
|
|
(76 |
) |
|
|
(15 |
) |
|
|
(90 |
) |
|
|
(181 |
) |
Reclassification of asbestos and environmental liabilities [4] |
|
|
51 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
(54 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending liability net [2][3] |
|
$ |
1,997 |
[5] |
|
$ |
257 |
|
|
$ |
1,467 |
|
|
$ |
3,721 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1] |
|
All Other includes unallocated loss adjustment expense reserves and the allowance for uncollectible reinsurance. |
|
[2] |
|
Excludes asbestos and environmental net liabilities reported in Ongoing Operations of $11 and $5, respectively, as of
June 30, 2009, $12 and $6, respectively, as of March 31, 2009, and $12 and $6, respectively, as of December 31, 2008.
Total net losses and loss adjustment expenses incurred in Ongoing Operations for the three and six months ended June
30, 2009 includes $2 and $8, respectively, related to asbestos and environmental claims. Total net losses and loss
adjustment expenses paid in Ongoing Operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 includes $4 and $10,
respectively, related to asbestos and environmental claims. |
|
[3] |
|
Gross of reinsurance, asbestos and environmental reserves, including liabilities in Ongoing Operations, were $2,622 and
$292, respectively, as of June 30, 2009, $2,453 and $301, respectively, as of March 31, 2009, and $2,498 and $309,
respectively, as of December 31, 2008. |
|
[4] |
|
During the three months ended June 30, 2009, the Company reclassified liabilities of $54 that were previously
classified as All Other to Asbestos and Environmental. |
|
[5] |
|
The one-year and average three-year net paid amounts for asbestos claims, including Ongoing Operations, are $182 and
$232, respectively, resulting in a one year net survival ratio of 11.0 and a three year net survival ratio of 8.6. Net
survival ratio is the quotient of the net carried reserves divided by the average annual payment amount and is an
indication of the number of years that the net carried reserve would last (i.e., survive) if the future annual claim
payments were consistent with the calculated historical average. |
During the second quarter of 2009, the Company completed its annual ground-up asbestos reserve
evaluation. As part of this evaluation, the Company reviewed all of its open direct domestic
insurance accounts exposed to asbestos liability as well as assumed reinsurance accounts and its
London Market exposures for both direct insurance and assumed reinsurance. Based on this
evaluation, the Company increased its net asbestos reserves by $138. For certain direct
policyholders, the Company experienced increases in claim severity, expense and costs associated
with litigating asbestos coverage matters. Increases in severity and expense were most prevalent
among certain, peripheral defendant insureds. The Company also experienced unfavorable development
on its assumed reinsurance accounts driven largely by the same factors experienced by the direct
policyholders. In the second quarter of 2008, the Company increased its net asbestos reserves by
$50 driven by account specific changes. The Company currently expects to continue to perform an
evaluation of its asbestos liabilities annually.
The Company divides its gross asbestos exposures into Direct, Assumed Reinsurance and London
Market. The Company further divides its direct asbestos exposures into the following categories:
Major Asbestos Defendants (the Top 70 accounts in Tillinghasts published Tiers 1 and 2 and
Wellington accounts), which are subdivided further as: Structured Settlements, Wellington, Other
Major Asbestos Defendants; Accounts with Future Expected Exposures greater than $2.5; Accounts with
Future Expected Exposures less than $2.5 and Unallocated.
|
|
Structured Settlements are those accounts where the Company has reached an agreement with
the insured as to the amount and timing of the claim payments to be made to the insured. |
|
|
The Wellington subcategory includes insureds that entered into the Wellington Agreement
dated June 19, 1985. The Wellington Agreement provided terms and conditions for how the
signatory asbestos producers would access their coverage from the signatory insurers. |
131
|
|
The Other Major Asbestos Defendants subcategory represents insureds included in Tiers 1 and
2, as defined by Tillinghast that are not Wellington signatories and have not entered into
structured settlements with The Hartford. The Tier 1 and 2 classifications are meant to
capture the insureds for which there is expected to be significant exposure to asbestos
claims. |
|
|
Accounts with future expected exposures greater or less than $2.5 include accounts that are
not major asbestos defendants. |
|
|
The Unallocated category includes an estimate of the reserves necessary for asbestos claims
related to direct insureds that have not previously tendered asbestos claims to the Company
and exposures related to liability claims that may not be subject to an aggregate limit under
the applicable policies. |
An account may move between categories from one evaluation to the next. For example, an account
with future expected exposure of greater than $2.5 in one evaluation may be reevaluated due to
changing conditions and recategorized as less than $2.5 in a subsequent evaluation or vice versa.
The following table displays asbestos reserves and other statistics by policyholder category, as of
June 30, 2009:
Summary of Gross Asbestos Reserves
As of June 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of |
|
|
All Time |
|
|
Total |
|
|
All Time |
|
|
|
Accounts [1] |
|
|
Paid [2] |
|
|
Reserves |
|
|
Ultimate [2] |
|
Major asbestos defendants [4] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Structured settlements (includes 4 Wellington accounts) [5] |
|
|
7 |
|
|
$ |
270 |
|
|
$ |
475 |
|
|
$ |
745 |
|
Wellington (direct only) |
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
904 |
|
|
|
43 |
|
|
|
947 |
|
Other major asbestos defendants |
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
474 |
|
|
|
168 |
|
|
|
642 |
|
No known policies (includes 3 Wellington accounts) |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts with future exposure > $2.5 |
|
|
73 |
|
|
|
744 |
|
|
|
547 |
|
|
|
1,291 |
|
Accounts with future exposure < $2.5 |
|
|
1,104 |
|
|
|
424 |
|
|
|
119 |
|
|
|
543 |
|
Unallocated [6] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,687 |
|
|
|
366 |
|
|
|
2,053 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total direct |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
4,503 |
|
|
$ |
1,718 |
|
|
$ |
6,221 |
|
Assumed reinsurance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,110 |
|
|
|
557 |
|
|
|
1,667 |
|
London market |
|
|
|
|
|
|
581 |
|
|
|
347 |
|
|
|
928 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total as of June 30, 2009 [3] |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
6,194 |
|
|
$ |
2,622 |
|
|
$ |
8,816 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1] |
|
An account may move between categories from one evaluation to the next. Reclassifications were made as a result of the
reserve evaluation completed in the second quarter of 2009. |
|
[2] |
|
All Time Paid represents the total payments with respect to the indicated claim type that have already been made by the
Company as of the indicated balance sheet date. All Time Ultimate represents the Companys estimate, as of the indicated
balance sheet date, of the total payments that are ultimately expected to be made to fully settle the indicated payment
type. The amount is the sum of the amounts already paid (e.g., All Time Paid) and the estimated future payments (e.g.,
the amount shown in the column labeled Total Reserves). |
|
[3] |
|
Survival ratio is a commonly used industry ratio for comparing reserve levels between companies. While the method is
commonly used, it is not a predictive technique. Survival ratios may vary over time for numerous reasons such as large
payments due to the final resolution of certain asbestos liabilities, or reserve re-estimates. The survival ratio is
computed by dividing the recorded reserves by the average of the past three years of payments. The ratio is the calculated
number of years the recorded reserves would survive if future annual payments were equal to the average annual payments for
the past three years. The three-year gross survival ratio of 7.5 as of June 30, 2009 is computed based on total paid
losses of $1,051 for the period from July 1, 2006 to June 30, 2009. As of June 30, 2009, the one year gross paid amount for
total asbestos claims is $284, resulting in a one year gross survival ratio of 9.2. |
|
[4] |
|
Includes 25 open accounts at June 30, 2009. Included 25 open accounts at June 30, 2008. |
|
[5] |
|
Structured settlements include the Companys reserves related to PPG Industries, Inc. (PPG). In January 2009, the
Company, along with approximately three dozen other insurers, entered into a modified agreement in principle with PPG to
resolve the Companys coverage obligations for all of its PPG asbestos liabilities, including principally those arising out
of its 50% stock ownership of Pittsburgh Corning Corporation (PCC), a joint venture with Corning, Inc. The agreement is
contingent on the fulfillment of certain conditions, including the confirmation of a PCC plan of reorganization under
Section 524(g) of the Bankruptcy Code, which have not yet been met. |
|
[6] |
|
Includes closed accounts (exclusive of Major Asbestos Defendants) and unallocated IBNR. |
For paid and incurred losses and loss adjustment expenses reporting, the Company also
classifies its asbestos and environmental reserves into three categories: Direct, Assumed
Reinsurance, and London Market. Direct insurance includes primary and excess coverage. Assumed
reinsurance includes both treaty reinsurance (covering broad categories of claims or blocks of
business) and facultative reinsurance (covering specific risks or individual policies of primary
or excess insurance companies). London Market business includes the business written by one or
more of the Companys subsidiaries in the United Kingdom, which are no longer active in the
insurance or reinsurance business. Such business includes both direct insurance and assumed
reinsurance.
Of the three categories of claims (Direct, Assumed Reinsurance and London Market), direct policies
tend to have the greatest factual development from which to estimate the Companys exposures.
Assumed reinsurance exposures are inherently less predictable than direct insurance exposures
because the Company may not receive notice of a reinsurance claim until the underlying direct
insurance claim is mature. This causes a delay in the receipt of information at the reinsurer
level and adds to the uncertainty of estimating related reserves.
132
London Market exposures are the most uncertain of the three categories of claims. As a participant
in the London Market (comprised of both Lloyds of London and London Market companies), certain
subsidiaries of the Company wrote business on a subscription basis, with those subsidiaries
involvement being limited to a relatively small percentage of a total contract placement. Claims
are reported, via a broker, to the lead underwriter and, once agreed to, are presented to the
following markets for concurrence. This reporting and claim agreement process makes estimating
liabilities for this business the most uncertain of the three categories of claims.
The following table sets forth, for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009, paid and incurred
loss activity by the three categories of claims for asbestos and environmental.
Paid and Incurred Losses and Loss Adjustment Expense (LAE) Development Asbestos and Environmental
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asbestos [1] |
|
|
Environmental [1] |
|
|
|
Paid |
|
|
Incurred |
|
|
Paid |
|
|
Incurred |
|
Three Months Ended June 30, 2009 |
|
Losses & LAE |
|
|
Losses & LAE |
|
|
Losses & LAE |
|
|
Losses & LAE |
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Direct |
|
$ |
33 |
|
|
$ |
117 |
|
|
$ |
6 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Assumed Reinsurance |
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
52 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
London Market |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
169 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
Ceded |
|
|
(13 |
) |
|
|
(31 |
) |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net prior to reclassification |
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
138 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
Reclassification of asbestos
and environmental liabilities
[2] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
51 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net |
|
$ |
37 |
|
|
$ |
189 |
|
|
$ |
7 |
|
|
$ |
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Direct |
|
$ |
69 |
|
|
$ |
117 |
|
|
$ |
13 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Assumed Reinsurance |
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
52 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
London Market |
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
95 |
|
|
|
169 |
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
|
|
Ceded |
|
|
(19 |
) |
|
|
(31 |
) |
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net prior to reclassification |
|
|
76 |
|
|
|
138 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
|
|
Reclassification of asbestos
and environmental liabilities
[2] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
51 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net |
|
$ |
76 |
|
|
$ |
189 |
|
|
$ |
15 |
|
|
$ |
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1] |
|
Excludes asbestos and environmental paid and incurred loss and LAE
reported in Ongoing Operations. Total gross losses and LAE
incurred in Ongoing Operations for the three and six months ended
June 30, 2009 includes $2 and $8, respectively, related to
asbestos and environmental claims. Total gross losses and LAE paid
in Ongoing Operations for the three and six months ended June 30,
2009 includes $5 and $10, respectively, related to asbestos and
environmental claims. |
|
[2] |
|
During the three months ended June 30, 2009, the Company
reclassified liabilities of $54 that were previously classified as
All Other to Asbestos and Environmental. |
A number of factors affect the variability of estimates for asbestos and environmental
reserves including assumptions with respect to the frequency of claims, the average severity of
those claims settled with payment, the dismissal rate of claims with no payment and the expense to
indemnity ratio. The uncertainty with respect to the underlying reserve assumptions for asbestos
and environmental adds a greater degree of variability to these reserve estimates than reserve
estimates for more traditional exposures. While this variability is reflected in part in the size
of the range of reserves developed by the Company, that range may still not be indicative of the
potential variance between the ultimate outcome and the recorded reserves. The recorded net
reserves as of June 30, 2009 of $2.27 billion ($2.01 billion and $262 for asbestos and
environmental, respectively) is within an estimated range, unadjusted for covariance, of $1.87
billion to $2.56 billion. The process of estimating asbestos and environmental reserves remains
subject to a wide variety of uncertainties, which are detailed in the Companys 2008 Form 10-K
Annual Report. The Company believes that its current asbestos and environmental reserves are
appropriate. However, analyses of future developments could cause the Company to change its
estimates and ranges of its asbestos and environmental reserves, and the effect of these changes
could be material to the Companys consolidated operating results, financial condition and
liquidity.
133
The Company provides an allowance for uncollectible reinsurance, reflecting managements best
estimate of reinsurance cessions that may be uncollectible in the future due to reinsurers
unwillingness or inability to pay. During the second quarter of 2009, the Company completed its
annual evaluation of the collectibility of the reinsurance recoverables and the adequacy of the
allowance for uncollectible reinsurance associated with older, long-term casualty liabilities
reported in the Other Operations segment. In conducting this evaluation, the Company used its most
recent detailed evaluations of ceded liabilities reported in the segment. The Company analyzed the
overall credit quality of the Companys reinsurers, recent trends in arbitration and litigation
outcomes in disputes between cedants and reinsurers, and recent developments in commutation
activity between reinsurers and cedants. Based on this evaluation, the Company reduced its
allowance for uncollectible reinsurance by $20 principally to reflect decreased reinsurance
recoverable dispute exposure and favorable activity since the last evaluation. As of June 30,
2009, the allowance for uncollectible reinsurance for Other Operations totals $223. The Company
currently expects to perform its regular comprehensive review of Other Operations reinsurance
recoverables annually. Due to the inherent uncertainties as to collection and the length of time
before reinsurance recoverables become due, particularly for older, long-term casualty liabilities,
it is possible that future adjustments to the Companys reinsurance recoverables, net of the
allowance, could be required.
The Company expects to perform its regular review of environmental liabilities in the third quarter
of 2009. Consistent with the Companys long-standing reserve practices, the Company will continue
to review and monitor its reserves in the Other Operations segment regularly, and where future
developments indicate, make appropriate adjustments to the reserves. For a discussion of the
Companys reserving practices, see the Critical Accounting EstimatesProperty & Casualty Reserves,
Net of Reinsurance and Other Operations (Including Asbestos and Environmental Claims) sections of
the MD&A included in the Companys 2008 Form 10-K Annual Report.
134
CORPORATE
Corporate Invested Assets
The investment objective of Corporate is to raise capital through financing activities to support
the Life and Property & Casualty operations of the Company and to maintain sufficient funds to
support the cost of those financing activities including the payment of interest for The Hartford
Financial Services Group, Inc. (HFSG) issued debt and dividends to shareholders of The Hartfords
common and preferred stock.
The following table presents Corporates invested assets by type.
Composition of Invested Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2009 |
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Percent |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Percent |
|
Fixed maturities, AFS, at fair value [1] |
|
$ |
115 |
|
|
|
2.6 |
% |
|
$ |
155 |
|
|
|
8.8 |
% |
Equity securities, AFS, at fair value |
|
|
80 |
|
|
|
1.8 |
% |
|
|
73 |
|
|
|
4.2 |
% |
Mortgage loans on real estate [2] |
|
|
288 |
|
|
|
6.6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other investments [3] |
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
0.9 |
% |
|
|
43 |
|
|
|
2.4 |
% |
Short-term investments [4] |
|
|
3,877 |
|
|
|
88.1 |
% |
|
|
1,488 |
|
|
|
84.6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total investments |
|
$ |
4,399 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
$ |
1,759 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1] |
|
Includes $27 as of June 30, 2009 acquired through the purchase of Federal Trust Corporation. |
|
[2] |
|
Includes $288 as of June 30, 2009 of residential and commercial loans acquired through the purchase of Federal Trust Corporation. |
|
[3] |
|
Relates to a put option agreement for the Companys contingent capital facility. |
|
[4] |
|
Includes $211 as of June 30, 2009 acquired through the purchase of Federal Trust Corporation. |
Total investments increased $2.6 billion since December 31, 2008 primarily due to the receipt
of approximately $3.4 billion from the U.S. Department of Treasurys Capital Purchase Program
(CPP) which was primarily invested in short-term money market funds. Subsequent to the receipt
of the CPP funds, $500 was contributed to the Companys Life operations and $185 was contributed to
Federal Trust Corporation. For further information on the Capital Purchase Program, see the
Capital Resources and Liquidity Section of the MD&A.
135
INVESTMENT CREDIT RISK
The Company has established investment credit policies that focus on the credit quality of
obligors and counterparties, limit credit concentrations, encourage diversification and require
frequent creditworthiness reviews. Investment activity, including setting of policy and defining
acceptable risk levels, is subject to regular review and approval by senior management.
The Company invests primarily in securities which are rated investment grade and has established
exposure limits, diversification standards and review procedures for all credit risks including
borrower, issuer and counterparty. Creditworthiness of specific obligors is determined by
consideration of external determinants of creditworthiness, typically ratings assigned by
nationally recognized ratings agencies and is supplemented by an internal credit evaluation.
Obligor, asset sector and industry concentrations are subject to established Company limits and are
monitored on a regular basis.
The Company is not exposed to any credit concentration risk of a single issuer greater than 10% of
the Companys stockholders equity other than U.S. government and U.S. government agencies backed
by the full faith and credit of the U.S. government. For further discussion of concentration of
credit risk, see the Concentration of Credit Risk Section in Note 5 of Notes to Consolidated
Financial Statements in The Hartfords 2008 Form 10-K Annual Report.
Derivative Instruments
In the normal course of business, the Company uses various derivative counterparties in executing
its derivative transactions. The use of counterparties creates credit risk that the counterparty
may not perform in accordance with the terms of the derivative transaction. The Company has
developed a derivative counterparty exposure policy which limits the Companys exposure to credit
risk.
The derivative counterparty exposure policy establishes market-based credit limits, favors
long-term financial stability and creditworthiness of the counterparty and typically requires
credit enhancement/credit risk reducing agreements.
The Company minimizes the credit risk of derivative instruments by entering into transactions with
high quality counterparties rated A2/A or better, which are monitored and evaluated by the
Companys risk management team and reviewed by senior management. In addition, the internal
compliance unit monitors counterparty credit exposure on a monthly basis to ensure compliance with
Company policies and statutory limitations. The Company also maintains a policy of requiring that
derivative contracts, other than exchange traded contracts, certain currency forward contracts, and
certain embedded derivatives, be governed by an International Swaps and Derivatives Association
Master Agreement which is structured by legal entity and by counterparty and permits right of
offset.
The Company has developed credit exposure thresholds which are based upon counterparty ratings.
Credit exposures are measured using the market value of the derivatives, resulting in amounts owed
to the Company by its counterparties or potential payment obligations from the Company to its
counterparties. Credit exposures are generally quantified daily based on the prior business days
market value and collateral is pledged to and held by, or on behalf of, the Company to the extent
the current value of derivatives exceeds the contractual thresholds. In accordance with industry
standards and the contractual agreements, collateral is typically settled on the next business day.
The Company has exposure to credit risk for amounts below the exposure thresholds which are
uncollateralized as well as for market fluctuations that may occur between contractual settlement
periods of collateral movements.
The maximum uncollateralized threshold for a derivative counterparty for a single legal entity is
$10. The Company currently transacts derivatives in five legal entities and therefore the maximum
combined threshold for a single counterparty over all legal entities that use derivatives is $50.
In addition, the Company may have exposure to multiple counterparties in a single corporate family
due to a common credit support provider. As of June 30, 2009, the maximum combined threshold for
all counterparties under a single credit support provider over all legal entities that use
derivatives is $100. Based on the contractual terms of the collateral agreements, these thresholds
may be immediately reduced due to a downgrade in a counterpartys credit rating. For further
discussion, see the Derivative Commitments Section of Note 9 of the Condensed Consolidated
Financial Statements.
For the three and six months ended June 30, 2009, the Company has incurred no losses on derivative
instruments due to counterparty default.
In addition to counterparty credit risk, the Company enters into credit derivative instruments to
manage credit exposure. Credit derivatives used by the Company include credit default swaps,
credit index swaps, and total return swaps.
Credit default swaps involve a transfer of credit risk of one or many referenced entities from one
party to another in exchange for periodic payments. The party that purchases credit protection
will make periodic payments based on an agreed upon rate and notional amount, and for certain
transactions there will also be an upfront premium payment. The second party, who assumes credit
risk, will typically only make a payment if there is a credit event and such payment will be equal
to the notional value of the swap contract less the value of the referenced security issuers debt
obligation. A credit event is generally defined as default on contractually obligated interest or
principal payments or bankruptcy of the referenced entity.
Credit index swaps and total return swaps involve the periodic exchange of payments with other
parties, at specified intervals, calculated using the agreed upon index and notional principal
amounts. Generally, no cash or principal payments are exchanged at the inception of the contract.
136
The Company uses credit derivatives to purchase credit protection and assume credit risk with
respect to a single entity, referenced index, or asset pool. The Company enters into credit
default swaps that assume credit risk as part of replication transactions. Replication
transactions are used as an economical means to synthetically replicate the characteristics and
performance of assets that would otherwise be permissible investments under the Companys
investment policies. These swaps reference investment grade single corporate issuers and baskets,
which include trades ranging from baskets of up to five corporate issuers to standard and
customized diversified portfolios of corporate issuers, which are established within sector
concentration limits and are typically divided into tranches which possess different credit ratings
ranging from AAA through the CCC rated first loss position. In addition to the credit default
swaps that assume credit risk, the Company also purchases credit protection through credit default
swaps to economically hedge and manage credit risk of certain fixed maturity investments across
multiple sectors of the investment portfolio.
The credit default swaps are carried on the balance sheet at fair value. The Company received
upfront premium payments on certain credit default swaps, which reduces the Companys overall
credit exposure with respect to credit default swaps. The following table summarizes the credit
default swaps used by the Company to manage credit risk within the portfolio, excluding credit
default swaps in offsetting positions which had a notional amount of $3.8 billion as of June 30,
2009.
Credit Default Swaps
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2009 |
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Initial |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Initial |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notional |
|
|
Premium |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notional |
|
|
Premium |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Received |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Received |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
Assume credit risk |
|
$ |
1,075 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(316 |
) |
|
$ |
1,082 |
|
|
$ |
(2 |
) |
|
$ |
(399 |
) |
Purchase credit protection |
|
|
4,270 |
|
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
3,668 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
340 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total credit default swaps |
|
$ |
5,345 |
|
|
$ |
(8 |
) |
|
$ |
(307 |
) |
|
$ |
4,750 |
|
|
$ |
(3 |
) |
|
$ |
(59 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During the six months ended June 30, 2009, the Company continued to reduce overall credit risk
exposure to general credit spread movements within its fixed maturity portfolio by increasing the
notional amount of the credit default swaps that purchase credit protection. The Companys credit
default swap portfolio has experienced and may continue to experience market value fluctuations
based upon certain market conditions, including credit spread movement of specific referenced
entities. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2009, the Company realized net losses of
$124 and $308, respectively, including periodic net coupon settlements, on credit default swaps.
The net loss on credit derivatives that purchase credit protection, which are used to economically
hedge fixed maturity securities, and the net gain on credit derivatives that assume credit risk as
a part of replication transactions resulted from credit spreads tightening.
Available-for-Sale Securities
The following table presents the Companys fixed maturities by credit quality on a consolidated
basis. The ratings referenced below are based on the ratings of a nationally recognized rating
organization or, if not rated, assigned based on the Companys internal analysis of such
securities.
Consolidated Fixed Maturities by Credit Quality
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2009 |
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent of |
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Fair |
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Fair |
|
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Value |
|
Government/Government agencies U.S. |
|
$ |
7,944 |
|
|
$ |
7,801 |
|
|
|
12.0 |
% |
|
$ |
9,409 |
|
|
$ |
9,568 |
|
|
|
14.7 |
% |
AAA |
|
|
14,625 |
|
|
|
11,797 |
|
|
|
18.2 |
% |
|
|
17,844 |
|
|
|
13,489 |
|
|
|
20.7 |
% |
AA |
|
|
12,830 |
|
|
|
11,044 |
|
|
|
17.0 |
% |
|
|
14,093 |
|
|
|
11,646 |
|
|
|
17.9 |
% |
A |
|
|
19,522 |
|
|
|
16,985 |
|
|
|
26.2 |
% |
|
|
18,742 |
|
|
|
15,831 |
|
|
|
24.4 |
% |
BBB |
|
|
16,989 |
|
|
|
14,687 |
|
|
|
22.7 |
% |
|
|
15,749 |
|
|
|
12,794 |
|
|
|
19.6 |
% |
BB & below |
|
|
4,286 |
|
|
|
2,554 |
|
|
|
3.9 |
% |
|
|
2,401 |
|
|
|
1,784 |
|
|
|
2.7 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total fixed maturities |
|
$ |
76,196 |
|
|
$ |
64,868 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
$ |
78,238 |
|
|
$ |
65,112 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The movement within the Companys investment ratings as a percentage of total fixed maturities
since December 31, 2008 is primarily attributable to recent rating agency downgrades across
multiple sectors, the unwind of the Companys term lending program and sales of U.S. Treasuries
being re-deployed into corporate securities. Currently, Standard & Poor (S&P) is contemplating
changes to its rating methodology for certain CMBS and anticipates potential downgrades in the
upcoming months which may impact the Companys CMBS and CRE CDO portfolios.
137
The following table presents the Companys AFS securities by type on a consolidated basis.
Consolidated Available-for-Sale Securities by Type
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2009 |
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent |
|
|
|
Cost or |
|
|
Gross |
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
|
of Total |
|
|
Cost or |
|
|
Gross |
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
|
of Total |
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Gains |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Gains |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Value |
|
AFS securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ABS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer loans |
|
$ |
2,111 |
|
|
$ |
2 |
|
|
$ |
(446 |
) |
|
$ |
1,667 |
|
|
|
2.6 |
% |
|
$ |
2,251 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(589 |
) |
|
$ |
1,662 |
|
|
|
2.6 |
% |
Small business |
|
|
549 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
(262 |
) |
|
|
288 |
|
|
|
0.4 |
% |
|
|
570 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(250 |
) |
|
|
320 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
% |
Other |
|
|
612 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
(127 |
) |
|
|
495 |
|
|
|
0.8 |
% |
|
|
610 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
(132 |
) |
|
|
484 |
|
|
|
0.7 |
% |
Collateralized debt
obligations (CDOs) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Collateralized loan
obligations
(CLOs) [1] |
|
|
2,809 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(619 |
) |
|
|
2,190 |
|
|
|
3.4 |
% |
|
|
2,865 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(735 |
) |
|
|
2,130 |
|
|
|
3.3 |
% |
CREs |
|
|
1,709 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
(1,349 |
) |
|
|
363 |
|
|
|
0.6 |
% |
|
|
1,763 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
(1,302 |
) |
|
|
463 |
|
|
|
0.7 |
% |
Other |
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(19 |
) |
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
|
|
CMBS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Agency backed [2] |
|
|
385 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
398 |
|
|
|
0.6 |
% |
|
|
433 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
449 |
|
|
|
0.7 |
% |
Bonds |
|
|
10,725 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
(3,872 |
) |
|
|
6,870 |
|
|
|
10.6 |
% |
|
|
11,144 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
(4,370 |
) |
|
|
6,784 |
|
|
|
10.4 |
% |
Interest only (IOs) |
|
|
1,251 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
(247 |
) |
|
|
1,022 |
|
|
|
1.6 |
% |
|
|
1,396 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
(333 |
) |
|
|
1,080 |
|
|
|
1.7 |
% |
Corporate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic industry |
|
|
2,356 |
|
|
|
65 |
|
|
|
(201 |
) |
|
|
2,220 |
|
|
|
3.4 |
% |
|
|
2,138 |
|
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
(338 |
) |
|
|
1,833 |
|
|
|
2.8 |
% |
Capital goods |
|
|
2,597 |
|
|
|
48 |
|
|
|
(188 |
) |
|
|
2,457 |
|
|
|
3.8 |
% |
|
|
2,480 |
|
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
(322 |
) |
|
|
2,190 |
|
|
|
3.3 |
% |
Consumer cyclical |
|
|
2,275 |
|
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
(190 |
) |
|
|
2,113 |
|
|
|
3.3 |
% |
|
|
2,335 |
|
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
(388 |
) |
|
|
1,981 |
|
|
|
3.0 |
% |
Consumer non-cyclical |
|
|
4,444 |
|
|
|
144 |
|
|
|
(109 |
) |
|
|
4,479 |
|
|
|
6.9 |
% |
|
|
3,435 |
|
|
|
60 |
|
|
|
(252 |
) |
|
|
3,243 |
|
|
|
5.0 |
% |
Energy |
|
|
2,429 |
|
|
|
79 |
|
|
|
(54 |
) |
|
|
2,454 |
|
|
|
3.8 |
% |
|
|
1,669 |
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
(146 |
) |
|
|
1,547 |
|
|
|
2.4 |
% |
Financial services |
|
|
7,956 |
|
|
|
68 |
|
|
|
(1,734 |
) |
|
|
6,290 |
|
|
|
9.7 |
% |
|
|
8,422 |
|
|
|
254 |
|
|
|
(1,543 |
) |
|
|
7,133 |
|
|
|
10.9 |
% |
Tech./comm. |
|
|
3,936 |
|
|
|
115 |
|
|
|
(192 |
) |
|
|
3,859 |
|
|
|
5.9 |
% |
|
|
3,738 |
|
|
|
86 |
|
|
|
(400 |
) |
|
|
3,424 |
|
|
|
5.3 |
% |
Transportation |
|
|
600 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
(73 |
) |
|
|
535 |
|
|
|
0.8 |
% |
|
|
508 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
(90 |
) |
|
|
426 |
|
|
|
0.7 |
% |
Utilities |
|
|
5,257 |
|
|
|
138 |
|
|
|
(294 |
) |
|
|
5,101 |
|
|
|
7.9 |
% |
|
|
4,859 |
|
|
|
92 |
|
|
|
(578 |
) |
|
|
4,373 |
|
|
|
6.7 |
% |
Other [3] |
|
|
1,604 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
(291 |
) |
|
|
1,327 |
|
|
|
2.0 |
% |
|
|
1,475 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(444 |
) |
|
|
1,031 |
|
|
|
1.6 |
% |
Govt./govt. agencies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign |
|
|
1,014 |
|
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
(24 |
) |
|
|
1,031 |
|
|
|
1.6 |
% |
|
|
2,786 |
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
(65 |
) |
|
|
2,821 |
|
|
|
4.3 |
% |
United States |
|
|
4,471 |
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
(254 |
) |
|
|
4,240 |
|
|
|
6.5 |
% |
|
|
5,883 |
|
|
|
112 |
|
|
|
(39 |
) |
|
|
5,956 |
|
|
|
9.2 |
% |
Municipal |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Taxable |
|
|
1,090 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
(203 |
) |
|
|
893 |
|
|
|
1.4 |
% |
|
|
1,115 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
(229 |
) |
|
|
894 |
|
|
|
1.4 |
% |
Tax-exempt |
|
|
10,249 |
|
|
|
204 |
|
|
|
(393 |
) |
|
|
10,060 |
|
|
|
15.5 |
% |
|
|
10,291 |
|
|
|
194 |
|
|
|
(724 |
) |
|
|
9,761 |
|
|
|
15.0 |
% |
RMBS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Agency |
|
|
3,088 |
|
|
|
87 |
|
|
|
(12 |
) |
|
|
3,163 |
|
|
|
4.9 |
% |
|
|
3,092 |
|
|
|
88 |
|
|
|
(15 |
) |
|
|
3,165 |
|
|
|
4.9 |
% |
Non-agency |
|
|
173 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
(50 |
) |
|
|
124 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
% |
|
|
213 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(48 |
) |
|
|
165 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
% |
Alt-A |
|
|
298 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(139 |
) |
|
|
159 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
% |
|
|
305 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(108 |
) |
|
|
197 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
% |
Sub-prime [4] |
|
|
2,179 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
(1,123 |
) |
|
|
1,060 |
|
|
|
1.6 |
% |
|
|
2,435 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
(862 |
) |
|
|
1,581 |
|
|
|
2.4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed maturities |
|
|
76,196 |
|
|
|
1,140 |
|
|
|
(12,468 |
) |
|
|
64,868 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
78,238 |
|
|
|
1,184 |
|
|
|
(14,310 |
) |
|
|
65,112 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
Equity securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial Services |
|
|
1,004 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
(392 |
) |
|
|
624 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
973 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
(196 |
) |
|
|
790 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
514 |
|
|
|
221 |
|
|
|
(51 |
) |
|
|
684 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
581 |
|
|
|
190 |
|
|
|
(103 |
) |
|
|
668 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total equity securities |
|
|
1,518 |
|
|
|
233 |
|
|
|
(443 |
) |
|
|
1,308 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,554 |
|
|
|
203 |
|
|
|
(299 |
) |
|
|
1,458 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total AFS securities [5] |
|
$ |
77,714 |
|
|
$ |
1,373 |
|
|
$ |
(12,911 |
) |
|
$ |
66,176 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
79,792 |
|
|
$ |
1,387 |
|
|
$ |
(14,609 |
) |
|
$ |
66,570 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1] |
|
As of June 30, 2009, 84% of these senior secured bank loan CLOs were AAA rated with an average subordination of 27%. |
|
[2] |
|
Represents securities with pools of loans by the Small Business Administration whose issued loans are backed by the full
faith and credit of the U.S. government. |
|
[3] |
|
Includes structured investments with an amortized cost and fair value of $556 and $413, respectively, as of June 30, 2009
and $526 and $364, respectively, as of December 31, 2008. The underlying securities supporting these investments are
primarily diversified pools of investment grade corporate issuers which can withstand a 15% cumulative default rate,
assuming a 35% recovery. |
|
[4] |
|
Includes CDO securities with an amortized cost and fair value of $6 and $1, respectively, as of June 30, 2009 and $8 and
$5, respectively, as of December 31, 2008, that contain a sub-prime residential mortgage loan component. |
|
[5] |
|
Gross unrealized gains represent gains of $831, $536, and $6 for Life, Property & Casualty, and Corporate, respectively, as
of June 30, 2009 and $860, $526, and $1, respectively, as of December 31, 2008. Gross unrealized losses represent losses
of $9,903, $3,003, and $5 for Life, Property & Casualty, and Corporate, respectively, as of June 30, 2009 and $10,766,
$3,835, and $8, respectively, as of December 31, 2008. |
138
The Company continues to reallocate its AFS investment portfolio to securities with more
favorable risk/return profiles, in particular corporate securities within consumer non-cyclical and
other recession resistant sectors. In conjunction with this strategy, the Company sold U.S.
Treasuries in an effort to reallocate the portfolio to higher quality securities. The Companys
AFS net unrealized loss position decreased $1.7 billion since December 31, 2008 primarily as a
result of improved security valuations due to credit spread tightening, partially offset by the
cumulative effect adjustment of $1.4 billion related to the adoption of FSP No. 115-2. For further
discussion of FSP No. 115-2, see Note 1 of the Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements. The following sections highlight the Companys significant investment sectors.
Financial Services
Several positive developments for financial services firms occurred in the second quarter of 2009.
The Federal Reserve completed its Supervisory Capital Assessment Program (SCAP), or stress test,
of the top nineteen banks. The results of the SCAP indicated a capital need of $75 billion for
these banks, and subsequent capital raising activities, including equity issuance, liability
management and asset sales, largely filled the capital shortfall, with the remainder expected to be
filled through future earnings. The SCAP results helped to reduce fears of systemic risk and
consequently stabilized and reopened the capital markets to financial services companies.
Additionally, several firms repaid their Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP) preferred
investments from the U.S. Department of Treasury and are expected to reduce or eliminate reliance
on the FDIC Temporary Liquidity Guarantee Program. Insurance companies were also able to access
the capital markets during the quarter, raising over $14 billion in common equity and debt, helping
to stabilize capital and liquidity positions. Despite these positives, financial services
companies continue to face a difficult macroeconomic environment and remain vulnerable to
deteriorating asset performance and quality, as well as weak earnings prospects.
The Company has exposure to the financial services sector predominantly through banking, insurance
and finance firms. Since December 31, 2008, the Company has reduced its exposure to this sector.
A comparison of fair value to amortized cost is not indicative of the pricing of individual
securities as impairments have occurred. The following table presents the Companys exposure to
the financial services sector included in the corporate and equity securities lines in the
Consolidated AFS Securities by Type table above.
Financial Services by Credit Quality [1]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2009 |
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent of |
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Fair |
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Fair |
|
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Value |
|
AAA |
|
$ |
235 |
|
|
$ |
226 |
|
|
|
3.3 |
% |
|
$ |
728 |
|
|
$ |
628 |
|
|
|
7.9 |
% |
AA |
|
|
1,866 |
|
|
|
1,640 |
|
|
|
23.7 |
% |
|
|
2,067 |
|
|
|
1,780 |
|
|
|
22.5 |
% |
A |
|
|
4,394 |
|
|
|
3,378 |
|
|
|
48.9 |
% |
|
|
5,479 |
|
|
|
4,606 |
|
|
|
58.1 |
% |
BBB |
|
|
1,654 |
|
|
|
1,149 |
|
|
|
16.6 |
% |
|
|
1,015 |
|
|
|
816 |
|
|
|
10.3 |
% |
BB & below |
|
|
811 |
|
|
|
521 |
|
|
|
7.5 |
% |
|
|
106 |
|
|
|
93 |
|
|
|
1.2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
8,960 |
|
|
$ |
6,914 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
$ |
9,395 |
|
|
$ |
7,923 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1] |
|
The credit qualities above include downgrades that have shifted the portfolio from higher
rated assets to lower rated assets since December 31, 2008. |
139
Sub-Prime Residential Mortgage Loans
The following table presents the Companys exposure to RMBS supported by sub-prime mortgage loans
by current credit quality and vintage year included in the RMBS sub-prime line in the Consolidated
AFS Securities by Type table above. These securities continue to be affected by declining home
prices, negative technical factors and deterioration in collateral performance. A comparison of
fair value to amortized cost is not indicative of the pricing of individual securities as
impairments have occurred. Credit protection represents the current weighted average percentage,
excluding wrapped securities, of the outstanding capital structure subordinated to the Companys
investment holding that is available to absorb losses before the security incurs the first dollar
loss of principal.
Sub-Prime Residential Mortgage Loans [1] [2] [3] [4] [5]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2009 |
|
|
|
AAA |
|
|
AA |
|
|
A |
|
|
BBB |
|
|
BB and Below |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Value |
|
2003 & Prior |
|
$ |
42 |
|
|
$ |
32 |
|
|
$ |
145 |
|
|
$ |
97 |
|
|
$ |
47 |
|
|
$ |
29 |
|
|
$ |
33 |
|
|
$ |
18 |
|
|
$ |
50 |
|
|
$ |
27 |
|
|
$ |
317 |
|
|
$ |
203 |
|
2004 |
|
|
91 |
|
|
|
63 |
|
|
|
357 |
|
|
|
212 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
467 |
|
|
|
284 |
|
2005 |
|
|
74 |
|
|
|
43 |
|
|
|
291 |
|
|
|
178 |
|
|
|
148 |
|
|
|
75 |
|
|
|
106 |
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
166 |
|
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
785 |
|
|
|
352 |
|
2006 |
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
299 |
|
|
|
89 |
|
|
|
390 |
|
|
|
144 |
|
2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
204 |
|
|
|
68 |
|
|
|
220 |
|
|
|
77 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
237 |
|
|
$ |
165 |
|
|
$ |
805 |
|
|
$ |
494 |
|
|
$ |
229 |
|
|
$ |
129 |
|
|
$ |
185 |
|
|
$ |
55 |
|
|
$ |
723 |
|
|
$ |
217 |
|
|
$ |
2,179 |
|
|
$ |
1,060 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credit protection |
|
|
43.6% |
|
|
|
48.9% |
|
|
|
53.1% |
|
|
|
32.8% |
|
|
|
26.9% |
|
|
|
41.6% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
AAA |
|
|
AA |
|
|
A |
|
|
BBB |
|
|
BB and Below |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Value |
|
2003 & Prior |
|
$ |
49 |
|
|
$ |
41 |
|
|
$ |
162 |
|
|
$ |
136 |
|
|
$ |
60 |
|
|
$ |
43 |
|
|
$ |
32 |
|
|
$ |
26 |
|
|
$ |
34 |
|
|
$ |
20 |
|
|
$ |
337 |
|
|
$ |
266 |
|
2004 |
|
|
112 |
|
|
|
81 |
|
|
|
349 |
|
|
|
277 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
479 |
|
|
|
372 |
|
2005 |
|
|
90 |
|
|
|
71 |
|
|
|
543 |
|
|
|
367 |
|
|
|
154 |
|
|
|
77 |
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
834 |
|
|
|
549 |
|
2006 |
|
|
77 |
|
|
|
69 |
|
|
|
126 |
|
|
|
56 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
120 |
|
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
143 |
|
|
|
54 |
|
|
|
484 |
|
|
|
238 |
|
2007 |
|
|
42 |
|
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
47 |
|
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
134 |
|
|
|
75 |
|
|
|
301 |
|
|
|
156 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
370 |
|
|
$ |
289 |
|
|
$ |
1,220 |
|
|
$ |
846 |
|
|
$ |
278 |
|
|
$ |
154 |
|
|
$ |
233 |
|
|
$ |
125 |
|
|
$ |
334 |
|
|
$ |
167 |
|
|
$ |
2,435 |
|
|
$ |
1,581 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credit protection |
|
|
40.5% |
|
|
|
47.6% |
|
|
|
31.4% |
|
|
|
21.9% |
|
|
|
19.9% |
|
|
|
41.0% |
|
|
|
|
[1] |
|
The vintage year represents the year the underlying loans in the pool were originated. |
|
[2] |
|
Includes second lien residential mortgages with an amortized cost and fair value of $109 and $43, respectively, as of June
30, 2009 and $173 and $82, respectively, as of December 31, 2008, which are composed primarily of loans to prime and Alt-A
borrowers. |
|
[3] |
|
As of June 30, 2009, the weighted average life of the sub-prime residential mortgage portfolio was 3.8 years. |
|
[4] |
|
Approximately 87% of the portfolio is backed by adjustable rate mortgages. |
|
[5] |
|
The credit qualities above include downgrades that have shifted the portfolio from higher rated assets to lower rated
assets since December 31, 2008. |
140
Commercial Mortgage Loans
The Company has observed weakness in commercial real estate market fundamentals and expects
continued pressure on these fundamentals including increased vacancies, rising delinquencies, lower
rent growth and declining property values. The following tables present the Companys exposure to
CMBS bonds, CRE CDOs and CMBS IOs by current credit quality and vintage year, included in the CMBS
and CRE CDO lines in the Consolidated AFS Securities by Type table above. A comparison of fair
value to amortized cost is not indicative of the pricing of individual securities as impairments
have occurred. Credit protection represents the current weighted average percentage of the
outstanding capital structure subordinated to the Companys investment holding that is available to
absorb losses before the security incurs the first dollar loss of principal. This credit
protection does not include any equity interest or property value in excess of outstanding debt.
The Companys CMBS and CRE CDO portfolios may be negatively impacted by contemplated changes to
S&Ps rating methodologies in the upcoming months. For further discussion, see Consolidated Fixed
Maturities by Credit Quality.
CMBS Bonds [1] [2]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2009 |
|
|
|
AAA |
|
|
AA |
|
|
A |
|
|
BBB |
|
|
BB and Below |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Value |
|
2003 & Prior |
|
$ |
1,896 |
|
|
$ |
1,817 |
|
|
$ |
446 |
|
|
$ |
310 |
|
|
$ |
173 |
|
|
$ |
103 |
|
|
$ |
36 |
|
|
$ |
30 |
|
|
$ |
38 |
|
|
$ |
25 |
|
|
$ |
2,589 |
|
|
$ |
2,285 |
|
2004 |
|
|
651 |
|
|
|
596 |
|
|
|
85 |
|
|
|
47 |
|
|
|
65 |
|
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
823 |
|
|
|
685 |
|
2005 |
|
|
1,114 |
|
|
|
902 |
|
|
|
425 |
|
|
|
203 |
|
|
|
247 |
|
|
|
110 |
|
|
|
133 |
|
|
|
64 |
|
|
|
54 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
1,973 |
|
|
|
1,296 |
|
2006 |
|
|
2,328 |
|
|
|
1,461 |
|
|
|
296 |
|
|
|
117 |
|
|
|
579 |
|
|
|
190 |
|
|
|
387 |
|
|
|
124 |
|
|
|
141 |
|
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
3,731 |
|
|
|
1,924 |
|
2007 |
|
|
851 |
|
|
|
482 |
|
|
|
305 |
|
|
|
92 |
|
|
|
142 |
|
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
151 |
|
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
160 |
|
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
1,609 |
|
|
|
680 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
6,840 |
|
|
$ |
5,258 |
|
|
$ |
1,557 |
|
|
$ |
769 |
|
|
$ |
1,206 |
|
|
$ |
473 |
|
|
$ |
729 |
|
|
$ |
264 |
|
|
$ |
393 |
|
|
$ |
106 |
|
|
$ |
10,725 |
|
|
$ |
6,870 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credit protection |
|
|
25.3% |
|
|
|
18.9% |
|
|
12.6% |
|
|
8.9% |
|
|
6.2% |
|
|
21.2% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
AAA |
|
|
AA |
|
|
A |
|
|
BBB |
|
|
BB and Below |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Value |
|
2003 & Prior |
|
$ |
2,057 |
|
|
$ |
1,869 |
|
|
$ |
455 |
|
|
$ |
299 |
|
|
$ |
175 |
|
|
$ |
102 |
|
|
$ |
36 |
|
|
$ |
27 |
|
|
$ |
37 |
|
|
$ |
25 |
|
|
$ |
2,760 |
|
|
$ |
2,322 |
|
2004 |
|
|
667 |
|
|
|
576 |
|
|
|
85 |
|
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
65 |
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
840 |
|
|
|
643 |
|
2005 |
|
|
1,142 |
|
|
|
847 |
|
|
|
475 |
|
|
|
152 |
|
|
|
325 |
|
|
|
127 |
|
|
|
55 |
|
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,997 |
|
|
|
1,153 |
|
2006 |
|
|
2,562 |
|
|
|
1,498 |
|
|
|
385 |
|
|
|
110 |
|
|
|
469 |
|
|
|
168 |
|
|
|
385 |
|
|
|
140 |
|
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
3,841 |
|
|
|
1,928 |
|
2007 |
|
|
981 |
|
|
|
504 |
|
|
|
438 |
|
|
|
128 |
|
|
|
148 |
|
|
|
45 |
|
|
|
134 |
|
|
|
60 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1,706 |
|
|
|
738 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
7,409 |
|
|
$ |
5,294 |
|
|
$ |
1,838 |
|
|
$ |
724 |
|
|
$ |
1,182 |
|
|
$ |
464 |
|
|
$ |
633 |
|
|
$ |
264 |
|
|
$ |
82 |
|
|
$ |
38 |
|
|
$ |
11,144 |
|
|
$ |
6,784 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credit protection |
|
|
24.4% |
|
|
|
16.4% |
|
|
12.2% |
|
|
5.3% |
|
|
4.4% |
|
|
20.6% |
|
|
|
|
[1] |
|
The vintage year represents the year the pool of loans was originated. |
|
[2] |
|
The credit qualities above include downgrades that have shifted the
portfolio from higher rated assets to lower rated assets since
December 31, 2008. |
141
CRE CDOs [1] [2] [3] [4]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2009 |
|
|
|
AAA |
|
|
AA |
|
|
A |
|
|
BBB |
|
|
BB and Below |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Value |
|
2003 & Prior |
|
$ |
61 |
|
|
$ |
30 |
|
|
$ |
31 |
|
|
$ |
9 |
|
|
$ |
75 |
|
|
$ |
19 |
|
|
$ |
190 |
|
|
$ |
38 |
|
|
$ |
112 |
|
|
$ |
12 |
|
|
$ |
469 |
|
|
$ |
108 |
|
2004 |
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
70 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
46 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
205 |
|
|
|
49 |
|
2005 |
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
74 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
91 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
232 |
|
|
|
40 |
|
2006 |
|
|
139 |
|
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
65 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
116 |
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
48 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
399 |
|
|
|
77 |
|
2007 |
|
|
101 |
|
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
94 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
46 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
313 |
|
|
|
69 |
|
2008 |
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
78 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
2009 |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
375 |
|
|
$ |
123 |
|
|
$ |
286 |
|
|
$ |
54 |
|
|
$ |
437 |
|
|
$ |
80 |
|
|
$ |
363 |
|
|
$ |
71 |
|
|
$ |
248 |
|
|
$ |
35 |
|
|
$ |
1,709 |
|
|
$ |
363 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credit protection |
|
|
26.9% |
|
|
|
12.5% |
|
|
|
20.5% |
|
|
|
36.4% |
|
|
|
36.5% |
|
|
|
26.3% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
AAA |
|
|
AA |
|
|
A |
|
|
BBB |
|
|
BB and Below |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Value |
|
2003 & Prior |
|
$ |
180 |
|
|
$ |
59 |
|
|
$ |
96 |
|
|
$ |
29 |
|
|
$ |
79 |
|
|
$ |
17 |
|
|
$ |
64 |
|
|
$ |
7 |
|
|
$ |
31 |
|
|
$ |
7 |
|
|
$ |
450 |
|
|
$ |
119 |
|
2004 |
|
|
129 |
|
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
202 |
|
|
|
58 |
|
2005 |
|
|
94 |
|
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
62 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
65 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
232 |
|
|
|
66 |
|
2006 |
|
|
242 |
|
|
|
76 |
|
|
|
91 |
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
81 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
429 |
|
|
|
123 |
|
2007 |
|
|
139 |
|
|
|
45 |
|
|
|
106 |
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
101 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
358 |
|
|
|
76 |
|
2008 |
|
|
43 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
92 |
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
827 |
|
|
$ |
268 |
|
|
$ |
394 |
|
|
$ |
99 |
|
|
$ |
381 |
|
|
$ |
72 |
|
|
$ |
115 |
|
|
$ |
14 |
|
|
$ |
46 |
|
|
$ |
10 |
|
|
$ |
1,763 |
|
|
$ |
463 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credit protection |
|
|
29.7% |
|
|
|
21.3% |
|
|
|
18.2% |
|
|
|
19.4% |
|
|
|
57.0% |
|
|
|
25.4% |
|
|
|
|
[1] |
|
The vintage year represents the year that the underlying collateral in the pool was originated. Individual CDO market value
is allocated by the proportion of collateral within each vintage year. |
|
[2] |
|
As of June 30, 2009, approximately 39% of the underlying CRE CDOs collateral are seasoned, below investment grade securities. |
|
[3] |
|
For certain CRE CDOs, the collateral manager has the ability to reinvest proceeds that become available, primarily from
collateral maturities. The increase in the 2008 and 2009 vintage years represents reinvestment under these CRE CDOs. |
|
[4] |
|
The credit qualities above include downgrades that have shifted the portfolio from higher rated assets to lower rated assets
since December 31, 2008. |
CMBS IOs [1] [2]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2009 |
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
AAA |
|
|
A |
|
|
BBB |
|
|
Total |
|
|
AAA |
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Value |
|
2003 & Prior |
|
$ |
386 |
|
|
$ |
357 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
386 |
|
|
$ |
357 |
|
|
$ |
440 |
|
|
$ |
423 |
|
2004 |
|
|
237 |
|
|
|
203 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
237 |
|
|
|
203 |
|
|
|
268 |
|
|
|
199 |
|
2005 |
|
|
315 |
|
|
|
249 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
316 |
|
|
|
250 |
|
|
|
354 |
|
|
|
245 |
|
2006 |
|
|
148 |
|
|
|
96 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
153 |
|
|
|
103 |
|
|
|
165 |
|
|
|
104 |
|
2007 |
|
|
159 |
|
|
|
109 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
159 |
|
|
|
109 |
|
|
|
169 |
|
|
|
109 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
1,245 |
|
|
$ |
1,014 |
|
|
$ |
5 |
|
|
$ |
7 |
|
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
$ |
1,251 |
|
|
$ |
1,022 |
|
|
$ |
1,396 |
|
|
$ |
1,080 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1] |
|
The vintage year represents the year the pool of loans was originated. |
|
[2] |
|
The credit qualities above include downgrades that have shifted the
portfolio from higher rated assets to lower rated assets since
December 31, 2008. |
In addition to commercial mortgage backed securities, the Company has commercial mortgage
loans on real estate, including agricultural loans, with a carrying value of $6.3 billion and $6.5
billion as of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively. These commercial mortgage loans
are collateralized by a variety of commercial and agricultural properties and are diversified both
geographically throughout the United States and by property type. The Companys commercial
mortgage loans may be either in the form of a whole loan, where the Company is the sole lender, or
a loan participation, where the Company is not the sole lender. Loan participations are loans
where the Company has purchased or retained a portion of an outstanding loan or package of loans
and participates on a pro-rata basis in collecting interest and principal pursuant to the terms of
the participation agreement. In general, A-Note participations have senior payment priority,
followed by B-Note participations and then mezzanine loan participations. At origination, the
weighted-average loan-to-value (LTV) rate of the Companys portfolio was approximately 63%.
142
The following table presents the Companys commercial mortgage loans, including agricultural loans,
by type and loan structure, net of valuation allowances.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Carrying Value |
|
|
|
June 30, 2009 |
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
Agricultural |
|
$ |
629 |
|
|
$ |
635 |
|
Commercial |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Whole loans |
|
|
3,520 |
|
|
|
3,555 |
|
A-Note participations |
|
|
443 |
|
|
|
447 |
|
B-Note participations |
|
|
698 |
|
|
|
724 |
|
Mezzanine loans |
|
|
1,008 |
|
|
|
1,108 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total [1] |
|
$ |
6,298 |
|
|
$ |
6,469 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1] |
|
Excludes $224 of residential mortgage loans acquired through the purchase of Federal Trust
Corporation that are included in the total mortgage loans on real estate as shown in the
Companys Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet. |
ABS Consumer Loans
The Company continues to see weakness in consumer credit fundamentals. Rising delinquency and loss
rates have been driven primarily by the recessionary economy and higher unemployment rates.
Delinquencies and losses on consumer loans rose during the second quarter of 2009 and the Company
expects this trend to continue throughout the year. Currently, the Company expects its ABS
consumer loan holdings will continue to pay contractual principal and interest payments due to the
ultimate expected borrower repayment performance and structural credit enhancements, which remain
sufficient to absorb a significantly higher level of defaults than are currently anticipated. The
following table presents the Companys exposure to ABS consumer loans by credit quality, included
in the ABS consumer loans line in the Consolidated AFS Securities by Type table above.
ABS Consumer Loans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2009 |
|
|
|
AAA |
|
|
AA |
|
|
A |
|
|
BBB |
|
|
BB and Below |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Value |
|
Auto [1] |
|
$ |
59 |
|
|
$ |
59 |
|
|
$ |
95 |
|
|
$ |
82 |
|
|
$ |
165 |
|
|
$ |
150 |
|
|
$ |
127 |
|
|
$ |
102 |
|
|
$ |
48 |
|
|
$ |
32 |
|
|
$ |
494 |
|
|
$ |
425 |
|
Credit card |
|
|
424 |
|
|
|
423 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
47 |
|
|
|
320 |
|
|
|
289 |
|
|
|
57 |
|
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
857 |
|
|
|
814 |
|
Student loan [2] |
|
|
293 |
|
|
|
141 |
|
|
|
329 |
|
|
|
225 |
|
|
|
138 |
|
|
|
62 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
760 |
|
|
|
428 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total [3] |
|
$ |
776 |
|
|
$ |
623 |
|
|
$ |
430 |
|
|
$ |
312 |
|
|
$ |
353 |
|
|
$ |
259 |
|
|
$ |
447 |
|
|
$ |
391 |
|
|
$ |
105 |
|
|
$ |
82 |
|
|
$ |
2,111 |
|
|
$ |
1,667 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
AAA |
|
|
AA |
|
|
A |
|
|
BBB |
|
|
BB and Below |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Value |
|
Auto |
|
$ |
135 |
|
|
$ |
109 |
|
|
$ |
29 |
|
|
$ |
27 |
|
|
$ |
142 |
|
|
$ |
103 |
|
|
$ |
209 |
|
|
$ |
162 |
|
|
$ |
30 |
|
|
$ |
20 |
|
|
$ |
545 |
|
|
$ |
421 |
|
Credit card |
|
|
419 |
|
|
|
367 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
108 |
|
|
|
97 |
|
|
|
351 |
|
|
|
248 |
|
|
|
58 |
|
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
942 |
|
|
|
754 |
|
Student loan |
|
|
294 |
|
|
|
159 |
|
|
|
332 |
|
|
|
244 |
|
|
|
138 |
|
|
|
84 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
764 |
|
|
|
487 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
848 |
|
|
$ |
635 |
|
|
$ |
367 |
|
|
$ |
274 |
|
|
$ |
388 |
|
|
$ |
284 |
|
|
$ |
560 |
|
|
$ |
410 |
|
|
$ |
88 |
|
|
$ |
59 |
|
|
$ |
2,251 |
|
|
$ |
1,662 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1] |
|
As of June 30, 2009, approximately 10% of the auto consumer
loan-backed securities were issued by lenders whose primary business
is to sub-prime borrowers. |
|
[2] |
|
As of June 30, 2009, approximately half of the student loan-backed
exposure is guaranteed by the Federal Family Education Loan Program,
with the remainder comprised of loans to prime-borrowers. |
|
[3] |
|
The credit qualities above include downgrades that have shifted the
portfolio from higher rated assets to lower rated assets since
December 31, 2008. |
Municipal Bonds
The Company has investments in securities backed by states, municipalities and political
subdivisions issuers (municipal bonds) with an amortized cost and fair value of $11.3 billion and
$11.0 billion, respectively, as of June 30, 2009 and $11.4 billion and $10.7 billion, respectively,
as of December 31, 2008. The municipal bond portfolio is diversified across the United States and
primarily consists of general obligation and revenue bonds issued by states, cities, counties,
school districts and similar issuers. As of June 30, 2009, the largest concentrations were in
California, Massachusetts and Georgia, which each comprised less than 3% of the municipal bond
portfolio and were primarily comprised of general obligations securities. Certain of the Companys
bonds were enhanced by third-party insurance for the payment of principal and interest in the event
of an issuer default. Excluding the benefit of this insurance, the average credit rating was A and
AA, respectively, as of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008.
143
Limited Partnerships and Other Alternative Investments
Limited partnerships and other alternative investments decreased $457 since December 31, 2008
primarily due to hedge fund redemptions and negative re-valuations of the underlying investments
associated primarily with the real estate and private equity markets. The Company expects further
hedge fund redemptions and does not expect significant additions to limited partnerships and other
alternative investments in 2009 except for unfunded commitments.
The following table presents the Companys limited partnerships and other alternative investments
by type.
Composition of Limited Partnerships and Other Alternative Investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2009 |
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Percent |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Percent |
|
Hedge funds [1] |
|
$ |
607 |
|
|
|
33.0 |
% |
|
$ |
834 |
|
|
|
36.3 |
% |
Mortgage and real estate [2] |
|
|
401 |
|
|
|
21.8 |
% |
|
|
551 |
|
|
|
24.0 |
% |
Mezzanine debt [3] |
|
|
131 |
|
|
|
7.1 |
% |
|
|
156 |
|
|
|
6.8 |
% |
Private equity and other [4] |
|
|
699 |
|
|
|
38.1 |
% |
|
|
754 |
|
|
|
32.9 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
1,838 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
$ |
2,295 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1] |
|
Hedge funds include investments in funds of funds, as well as
direct funds. The hedge funds of funds invest in approximately 25
to 50 different hedge funds within a variety of investment styles.
Examples of hedge fund strategies include long/short equity or
credit, event driven strategies and structured credit. |
|
[2] |
|
Mortgage and real estate funds consist of investments in funds
whose assets consist of mortgage loans, participations in mortgage
loans, mezzanine loans or other notes which may be below
investment grade credit quality, as well as equity real estate. A
portion of these partnerships underlying investments may be
purchased through lines of credit or other borrowings. Also
includes investments in real estate joint ventures. |
|
[3] |
|
Mezzanine debt funds consist of investments in funds whose assets
consist of subordinated debt that often times incorporates
equity-based options such as warrants and a limited amount of
direct equity investments. |
|
[4] |
|
Private equity and other funds primarily consist of investments in
funds whose assets typically consist of a diversified pool of
investments in small non-public businesses with high growth
potential. |
Other-Than-Temporary Impairment Losses
The following table presents the Companys net impairment losses recognized in earnings.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
ABS |
|
$ |
6 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
9 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
CDOs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CREs |
|
|
83 |
|
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
105 |
|
|
|
132 |
|
Other |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
CMBS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bonds |
|
|
69 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
70 |
|
|
|
23 |
|
IOs |
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial services |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
98 |
|
|
|
96 |
|
Other |
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
57 |
|
Equities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial services |
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
46 |
|
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
67 |
|
Other |
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
52 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
Government/government agencies foreign |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
Government/government agencies U.S. |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
Municipal |
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
RMBS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-agency |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
Alt-A |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
Sub-prime |
|
|
55 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
93 |
|
|
|
81 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net impairment losses recognized in earnings |
|
$ |
314 |
|
|
$ |
164 |
|
|
$ |
538 |
|
|
$ |
468 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the three months ended June 30, 2009, the Company recognized $314 of impairment losses in earnings. Of these
losses, $261 represented credit impairments, $8 represented debt securities for which the Company intends to sell and
$45 represented impairments on equity securities, including $4 due to the Companys intent to sell.
144
Credit impairments were primarily concentrated in CRE CDOs, CMBS bonds and sub-prime RMBS
securities. The Company determined these impairments by using discounted cash flow models that
considered losses under current and expected future economic conditions. Assumptions used over the
current recessionary period in the second quarter 2009 impairment review included macro economic
factors, such as a continued increase in the unemployment rate and continued gross domestic product
contraction, as well as sector specific factors including, but not limited to:
|
|
Commercial property value declines that average 35% to 40% from the valuation peak, but
differ by property type and location. |
|
|
Residential property value declines that averaged approximately 40% from the valuation
peak, but differ by location. |
|
|
Average cumulative CMBS collateral loss rates that vary by vintage year, but reach
approximately 9% for the 2006 and 2007 vintage years. |
|
|
Average cumulative RMBS collateral loss rates that vary by vintage year, but reach
approximately 40% for the 2007 vintage year. |
If these cash flow models result in an economic loss, a credit impairment is taken equal to the
difference between the securitys amortized cost basis and its best estimate of expected future
cash flows discounted at the securitys effective yield prior to impairment. Future impairments
may develop if actual results underperform current modeling assumptions, which may be the result
of, but are not limited to, macro economic factors, changes in assumptions used, property value
declines beyond current average assumptions or security loss rates exceeding average assumptions.
The Company recognized $8 of impairment losses for the three months ended June 30, 2009 on debt securities and $4 of
impairment losses on equity securities for which the Company had the intent to sell the securities as of June 30, 2009.
These securities were primarily corporate securities where the Company has an active plan to dispose of the
securities. In addition, the Company recognized $41 of impairments primarily on common stock and below investment
grade hybrid equity securities.
For the six months ended June 30, 2009, the Company recognized $538 of impairment losses in earnings. Of these losses,
$345 represented impairments taken on securities due to credit concerns; $261 were credit impairments taken in the
second quarter under the new FSP 115-2 methodology and $84 were credit impairments taken in the first quarter and
included a non-credit component due to the entire difference between amortized cost and fair value which was recorded
in net realized capital losses. Of the $345 of impairments taken on securities due to credit concerns, $306 related to
structured securities that incurred losses in our cash flow modeling as described above. In addition to the $345 of
credit impairments, the Company recognized $100 of impairments on debt securities for which the Company intends to
sell, largely corporate financial securities.
Equity security impairments of $93 for the six months ended June 30, 2009 include $26 of impairments taken on
affiliated mutual funds, which pursuant to the Companys policy have been impaired due to the duration and severity of
the loss associated with the securities, as well as $21 of impairments taken on equity securities where the Company has
an intent to sell.
For the three and six months ended June 30, 2008, impairments primarily consisted of CMBS, CRE CDO,
RMBS and corporate securities. The CMBS impairments were primarily related to securities that
contained recent vintage year collateral. The CRE CDO impairments were primarily related to
securities that contained below investment grade 2006 and 2007 vintage year collateral. RMBS
impairments were primarily taken on securities backed by second lien residential mortgages.
Corporate impairments were primarily due to financial services securities which experienced a lack
of liquidity.
145
Security Unrealized Loss Aging
As part of the Companys ongoing security monitoring process, the Company has reviewed its AFS
securities in an unrealized loss position and concluded that there were no additional impairments
as of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008. During this analysis, the Company determined that it
does not intend to sell nor does it expect to be required to sell the securities outlined below.
In addition, the Company asserts its intent and ability to retain the equity securities below until
price recovery. Furthermore, based upon the Companys cash flow modeling and the expected
continuation of contractually required principal and interest payments, the Company has deemed
these securities to be temporarily impaired as of June 30, 2009. For further discussion, see the
Recognition and Presentation of Other-Than-Temporary Impairments Section in Note 1 of the Notes to
the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
The following table presents the Companys unrealized loss aging for AFS securities on a
consolidated basis by length of time the security was in a continuous unrealized loss position.
Consolidated Securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2009 |
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost or |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost or |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
|
Items |
|
|
Cost [1] |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Loss [1] |
|
|
Items |
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Loss |
|
Three and six months or less |
|
|
1,102 |
|
|
$ |
7,722 |
|
|
$ |
6,604 |
|
|
$ |
(1,118 |
) |
|
|
1,718 |
|
|
$ |
16,425 |
|
|
$ |
14,992 |
|
|
$ |
(1,433 |
) |
Greater than three to six months |
|
|
299 |
|
|
|
4,007 |
|
|
|
3,052 |
|
|
|
(955 |
) |
|
|
972 |
|
|
|
6,533 |
|
|
|
5,247 |
|
|
|
(1,286 |
) |
Greater than six to nine months |
|
|
452 |
|
|
|
4,585 |
|
|
|
3,628 |
|
|
|
(957 |
) |
|
|
764 |
|
|
|
7,053 |
|
|
|
5,873 |
|
|
|
(1,180 |
) |
Greater than nine to twelve months |
|
|
646 |
|
|
|
4,115 |
|
|
|
3,509 |
|
|
|
(606 |
) |
|
|
741 |
|
|
|
6,459 |
|
|
|
4,957 |
|
|
|
(1,502 |
) |
Greater than twelve months |
|
|
2,947 |
|
|
|
32,525 |
|
|
|
23,250 |
|
|
|
(9,275 |
) |
|
|
2,417 |
|
|
|
25,279 |
|
|
|
16,071 |
|
|
|
(9,208 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
5,446 |
|
|
$ |
52,954 |
|
|
$ |
40,043 |
|
|
$ |
(12,911 |
) |
|
|
6,612 |
|
|
$ |
61,749 |
|
|
$ |
47,140 |
|
|
$ |
(14,609 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1] |
|
Includes the cumulative effect adjustment of $1.4 billion as a result of the adoption of
FSP FAS 115-2. |
The following tables present the Companys unrealized loss aging for AFS securities by length
of time the security was in a continuous greater than 20% unrealized loss position.
Securitized Assets Depressed over 20%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2009 |
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost or |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost or |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
Consecutive Months |
|
Items |
|
|
Cost [1] |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Loss [1] |
|
|
Items |
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Loss |
|
Three and six months or less |
|
|
191 |
|
|
$ |
1,797 |
|
|
$ |
1,132 |
|
|
$ |
(665 |
) |
|
|
786 |
|
|
$ |
10,981 |
|
|
$ |
6,474 |
|
|
$ |
(4,507 |
) |
Greater than three to six months |
|
|
120 |
|
|
|
2,414 |
|
|
|
1,452 |
|
|
|
(962 |
) |
|
|
162 |
|
|
|
1,790 |
|
|
|
629 |
|
|
|
(1,161 |
) |
Greater than six to nine months |
|
|
387 |
|
|
|
4,224 |
|
|
|
2,456 |
|
|
|
(1,768 |
) |
|
|
92 |
|
|
|
1,259 |
|
|
|
504 |
|
|
|
(755 |
) |
Greater than nine to twelve months |
|
|
251 |
|
|
|
2,963 |
|
|
|
1,218 |
|
|
|
(1,745 |
) |
|
|
157 |
|
|
|
1,743 |
|
|
|
471 |
|
|
|
(1,272 |
) |
Greater than twelve months |
|
|
300 |
|
|
|
3,376 |
|
|
|
842 |
|
|
|
(2,534 |
) |
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
360 |
|
|
|
64 |
|
|
|
(296 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
1,249 |
|
|
$ |
14,774 |
|
|
$ |
7,100 |
|
|
$ |
(7,674 |
) |
|
|
1,229 |
|
|
$ |
16,133 |
|
|
$ |
8,142 |
|
|
$ |
(7,991 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1] |
|
Includes cumulative effect adjustments as a result of the adoption of FSP FAS 115-2. |
All Other Securities Depressed over 20%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2009 |
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost or |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost or |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
Consecutive Months |
|
Items |
|
|
Cost [1] |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Loss [1] |
|
|
Items |
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Loss |
|
Three and six months or less |
|
|
262 |
|
|
$ |
3,152 |
|
|
$ |
2,142 |
|
|
$ |
(1,010 |
) |
|
|
1,003 |
|
|
$ |
10,531 |
|
|
$ |
7,009 |
|
|
$ |
(3,522 |
) |
Greater than three to six months |
|
|
77 |
|
|
|
827 |
|
|
|
493 |
|
|
|
(334 |
) |
|
|
63 |
|
|
|
349 |
|
|
|
171 |
|
|
|
(178 |
) |
Greater than six to nine months |
|
|
273 |
|
|
|
2,829 |
|
|
|
1,893 |
|
|
|
(936 |
) |
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
189 |
|
|
|
114 |
|
|
|
(75 |
) |
Greater than nine to twelve months |
|
|
126 |
|
|
|
1,573 |
|
|
|
1,009 |
|
|
|
(564 |
) |
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
246 |
|
|
|
139 |
|
|
|
(107 |
) |
Greater than twelve months |
|
|
42 |
|
|
|
484 |
|
|
|
249 |
|
|
|
(235 |
) |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
780 |
|
|
$ |
8,865 |
|
|
$ |
5,786 |
|
|
$ |
(3,079 |
) |
|
|
1,099 |
|
|
$ |
11,332 |
|
|
$ |
7,440 |
|
|
$ |
(3,892 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1] |
|
Includes cumulative effect adjustments as a result of the adoption of FSP FAS 115-2. |
146
Consolidated Securities Depressed over 20%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2009 |
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost or |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost or |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
Consecutive Months |
|
Items |
|
|
Cost [1] |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Loss [1] |
|
|
Items |
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Loss |
|
Three and six months or less |
|
|
453 |
|
|
$ |
4,949 |
|
|
$ |
3,274 |
|
|
$ |
(1,675 |
) |
|
|
1,789 |
|
|
$ |
21,512 |
|
|
$ |
13,483 |
|
|
$ |
(8,029 |
) |
Greater than three to six months |
|
|
197 |
|
|
|
3,241 |
|
|
|
1,945 |
|
|
|
(1,296 |
) |
|
|
225 |
|
|
|
2,139 |
|
|
|
800 |
|
|
|
(1,339 |
) |
Greater than six to nine months |
|
|
660 |
|
|
|
7,053 |
|
|
|
4,349 |
|
|
|
(2,704 |
) |
|
|
112 |
|
|
|
1,448 |
|
|
|
618 |
|
|
|
(830 |
) |
Greater than nine to twelve months |
|
|
377 |
|
|
|
4,536 |
|
|
|
2,227 |
|
|
|
(2,309 |
) |
|
|
169 |
|
|
|
1,989 |
|
|
|
610 |
|
|
|
(1,379 |
) |
Greater than twelve months |
|
|
342 |
|
|
|
3,860 |
|
|
|
1,091 |
|
|
|
(2,769 |
) |
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
377 |
|
|
|
71 |
|
|
|
(306 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
2,029 |
|
|
$ |
23,639 |
|
|
$ |
12,886 |
|
|
$ |
(10,753 |
) |
|
|
2,328 |
|
|
$ |
27,465 |
|
|
$ |
15,582 |
|
|
$ |
(11,883 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1] |
|
Includes cumulative effect adjustments as a result of the adoption of FSP FAS 115-2. |
The following tables present the Companys unrealized loss aging for AFS securities (included
in the tables above) by length of time the security was in a continuous greater than 50% unrealized
loss position.
Securitized Assets Depressed over 50%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2009 |
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost or |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost or |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
Consecutive Months |
|
Items |
|
|
Cost [1] |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Loss [1] |
|
|
Items |
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Loss |
|
Three and six months or less |
|
|
134 |
|
|
$ |
827 |
|
|
$ |
315 |
|
|
$ |
(512 |
) |
|
|
521 |
|
|
$ |
7,045 |
|
|
$ |
2,374 |
|
|
$ |
(4,671 |
) |
Greater than three to six months |
|
|
106 |
|
|
|
1,447 |
|
|
|
513 |
|
|
|
(934 |
) |
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
352 |
|
|
|
56 |
|
|
|
(296 |
) |
Greater than six to nine months |
|
|
327 |
|
|
|
4,124 |
|
|
|
1,288 |
|
|
|
(2,836 |
) |
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
267 |
|
|
|
44 |
|
|
|
(223 |
) |
Greater than nine to twelve months |
|
|
68 |
|
|
|
853 |
|
|
|
131 |
|
|
|
(722 |
) |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
(12 |
) |
Greater than twelve months |
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
297 |
|
|
|
42 |
|
|
|
(255 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
665 |
|
|
$ |
7,548 |
|
|
$ |
2,289 |
|
|
$ |
(5,259 |
) |
|
|
590 |
|
|
$ |
7,679 |
|
|
$ |
2,477 |
|
|
$ |
(5,202 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1] |
|
Includes cumulative effect adjustments as a result of the adoption of FSP FAS 115-2. |
All Other Securities Depressed over 50%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2009 |
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost or |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost or |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
Consecutive Months |
|
Items |
|
|
Cost [1] |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Loss [1] |
|
|
Items |
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Loss |
|
Three and six months or less |
|
|
37 |
|
|
$ |
479 |
|
|
$ |
211 |
|
|
$ |
(268 |
) |
|
|
129 |
|
|
$ |
1,305 |
|
|
$ |
549 |
|
|
$ |
(756 |
) |
Greater than three to six months |
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
422 |
|
|
|
173 |
|
|
|
(249 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Greater than six to nine months |
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
231 |
|
|
|
87 |
|
|
|
(144 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Greater than nine to twelve months |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Greater than twelve months |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
75 |
|
|
$ |
1,132 |
|
|
$ |
471 |
|
|
$ |
(661 |
) |
|
|
129 |
|
|
$ |
1,305 |
|
|
$ |
549 |
|
|
$ |
(756 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1] |
|
Includes cumulative effect adjustments as a result of the adoption of FSP FAS 115-2. |
Consolidated Securities Depressed over 50%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2009 |
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost or |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost or |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
Consecutive Months |
|
Items |
|
|
Cost [1] |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Loss [1] |
|
|
Items |
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Loss |
|
Three and six months or less |
|
|
171 |
|
|
$ |
1,306 |
|
|
$ |
526 |
|
|
$ |
(780 |
) |
|
|
650 |
|
|
$ |
8,350 |
|
|
$ |
2,923 |
|
|
$ |
(5,427 |
) |
Greater than three to six months |
|
|
126 |
|
|
|
1,869 |
|
|
|
686 |
|
|
|
(1,183 |
) |
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
352 |
|
|
|
56 |
|
|
|
(296 |
) |
Greater than six to nine months |
|
|
345 |
|
|
|
4,355 |
|
|
|
1,375 |
|
|
|
(2,980 |
) |
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
267 |
|
|
|
44 |
|
|
|
(223 |
) |
Greater than nine to twelve months |
|
|
68 |
|
|
|
853 |
|
|
|
131 |
|
|
|
(722 |
) |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
(12 |
) |
Greater than twelve months |
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
297 |
|
|
|
42 |
|
|
|
(255 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
740 |
|
|
$ |
8,680 |
|
|
$ |
2,760 |
|
|
$ |
(5,920 |
) |
|
|
719 |
|
|
$ |
8,984 |
|
|
$ |
3,026 |
|
|
$ |
(5,958 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1] |
|
Includes cumulative effect adjustments as a result of the adoption of FSP FAS 115-2. |
147
CAPITAL MARKETS RISK MANAGEMENT
The Hartford has a disciplined approach to managing risks associated with its capital markets
and asset/liability management activities. Investment portfolio management is organized to focus
investment management expertise on the specific classes of investments, while asset/liability
management is the responsibility of a dedicated risk management unit supporting Life and Property &
Casualty operations. Derivative instruments are utilized in compliance with established Company
policy and regulatory requirements and are monitored internally and reviewed by senior management.
During 2009, a global recession, continued deterioration in the U.S. housing market, and the
markets flight to quality securities contributed to strain the Companys investment portfolio.
Market Risk
The Hartford is exposed to market risk, primarily relating to the market price and/or cash flow
variability associated with changes in interest rates, credit spreads including issuer defaults,
equity prices or market indices, and foreign currency exchange rates. The Company is also exposed
to credit and counterparty repayment risk. The Company analyzes interest rate risk using various
models including parametric models that forecast cash flows of the liabilities and the supporting
investments, including derivative instruments, under various market scenarios. For further
discussion of market risk, see the Capital Markets Risk Management Section of the MD&A in The
Hartfords 2008 Form 10-K Annual Report.
Interest Rate Risk
The Companys exposure to interest rate risk relates to the market price and/or cash flow
variability associated with the changes in market interest rates. The Company manages its exposure
to interest rate risk through asset allocation limits, asset/liability duration matching and
through the use of derivatives. For further discussion of interest rate risk, see the Interest
Rate Risk discussion within the Capital Markets Risk Management Section of the MD&A in The
Hartfords 2008 Form 10-K Annual Report.
The Company is also exposed to interest rate risk based upon the discount rate assumption
associated with the Companys pension and other postretirement benefit obligations. The discount
rate assumption is based upon an interest rate yield curve comprised of bonds rated Aa or higher
with maturities primarily between zero and thirty years. For further discussion of interest rate
risk associated with the benefit obligations, see the Critical Accounting Estimates Section of the
MD&A under Pension and Other Postretirement Benefit Obligations and Note 17 of Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements in The Hartfords 2008 Form 10-K Annual Report.
Credit Risk
For further information on credit risk derivatives, see the Investment Credit Risk Section of the
MD&A.
The Company is also exposed to credit spread risk related to security market price and cash flows
associated with changes in credit spreads. Credit spread widening will reduce the fair value of
the investment portfolio and will increase net investment income on new purchases. This will also
result in losses associated with credit based non-qualifying derivatives where the Company assumes
credit exposure. If issuer credit spreads increase significantly or for an extended period of
time, it may result in higher other-than-temporary impairment losses. Credit spread tightening
will reduce net investment income associated with new purchases of fixed maturities and increase
the fair value of the investment portfolio. Credit spread tightening in certain sectors resulted
in a decrease in the Companys unrealized losses. For further discussion of sectors most
significantly impacted, see the Investment Credit Risk Section of the MD&A. Also, see the Capital
Resources and Liquidity Section of the MD&A for a discussion of the movement of credit spread
impacts on the Companys statutory financial results as it relates to the accounting and reporting
for market value fixed annuities.
Lifes Equity Product Risk
The Companys Life operations are significantly influenced by changes in the U.S., Japanese, and
other global equity markets. Appreciation or depreciation in equity markets impacts certain assets
and liabilities related to the Companys variable products and the Companys earnings derived from
those products. The Companys variable products include variable annuities, mutual funds, and
variable life insurance sold to retail and institutional customers. These variable products may
include product guarantees such as guaranteed minimum withdrawal benefits (GMWB), guaranteed
minimum death benefits (GMDB), and guaranteed minimum income benefits (GMIB).
Substantially all of the Companys variable annuity contracts contain GMDBs and a portion of those
contracts also contain GMWBs or GMIBs. The Companys maximum exposure disclosed below for death
and living benefits are calculated independently, however, these exposures are substantially
overlapping.
Generally, declines in equity markets, such as those experienced in 2008 and the first quarter of
2009, will and did:
|
|
reduce the value of assets under management and the amount of fee income generated from
those assets; |
|
|
reduce the value of equity securities, trading, for international variable annuities, the
related policyholder funds and benefits payable, and the amount of fee income generated from
those annuities; |
|
|
increase the liability for GMWB benefits resulting in realized capital losses; |
|
|
increase the value of derivative assets used to hedge product guarantees resulting in
realized capital gains; |
148
|
|
increase costs under the Companys hedging program; |
|
|
increase the Companys net amount at risk for GMDB and GMIB benefits; |
|
|
decrease the Companys actual gross profits, resulting in increased DAC amortization; |
|
|
increase the amount of required statutory capital necessary to maintain targeted risk based
capital (RBC) ratios; |
|
|
turn customer sentiment toward equity-linked products negative, causing a decline in sales;
and |
|
|
cause a significant decrease in the Companys estimates of future gross profits. See Life
Estimated Gross Profits Used in the Valuation and Amortization of Assets and Liabilities
Associated with Variable Annuity and Other Universal Life-Type Contracts within Critical
Accounting Estimates for further information on DAC and related equity market sensitivities. |
Guaranteed Minimum Withdrawal Benefits
The majority of the Companys U.S. and U.K. variable annuities include a GMWB living benefit rider
which is accounted for under SFAS 133. As of May 8, 2009, the Company suspended all new product
sales in the U.K. For the in-force block of U.S. and U.K. business, declines in the equity market
will increase the Companys exposure to benefits, under the GMWB contracts, leading to an increase
in the Companys existing liability for those benefits.
For example, a GMWB contract is in the money if the contract holders guaranteed remaining
benefit (GRB) becomes greater than the account value. As of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008,
78% and 88%, respectively, of all unreinsured U.S. GMWB in-force contracts were in the money.
For U.S. and U.K. GMWB contracts that were in the money the Companys exposure to the GRB, after
reinsurance, as of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, was
$6.1 billion and $7.7 billion,
respectively.
However, the only ways the GMWB contract holder can monetize the excess of the GRB over the account
value of the contract is upon death or if their account value is reduced to a contractually
specified minimum level, through a combination of a series of withdrawals that do not exceed a
specific percentage of the premiums paid per year and market declines. If the account value is
reduced to the contractually specified minimum level, the contract holder will receive an annuity
equal to the remaining GRB and, for the Companys life-time GMWB products, the annuity can
continue beyond the GRB. As the amount of the excess of the GRB over the account value can
fluctuate with equity market returns on a daily basis, and the ultimate life-time GMWB payments can
exceed the GRB, the ultimate amount to be paid by the Company, if any, is uncertain and could be
significantly more or less than $6.1 billion. For additional information on the Companys GMWB
liability, see Note 4 of Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
Guaranteed Minimum Death Benefits and Guaranteed Minimum Income Benefits
In the U.S., the Company sells variable annuity contracts that offer various GMDBs. Declines in
the equity market will increase the Companys liability for death benefits under these contracts.
The Company accounts for these GMDB liabilities under SOP 03-1, Accounting and Reporting by
Insurance Enterprises for Certain Nontraditional Long-Duration Contracts and for Separate
Accounts, and, as such, these liabilities are not carried at fair value under SFAS 157.
The Companys total gross exposure (i.e., before reinsurance) to U.S. GMDBs as of June 30, 2009 is
$28.9 billion. The Company will incur these GMDB payments in the future only if the policyholder
has an in-the-money GMDB at their time of death. The Company currently reinsures 50% of these
GMDBs. Under certain of these reinsurance agreements, the reinsurers exposure is subject to an
annual cap. For these products, the Companys net exposure (i.e. after reinsurance), referred to
as the retained net amount at risk, is $14.6 billion, as of June 30, 2009. For additional
information on the Companys GMDB liability, see Note 7 of Notes to Condensed Consolidated
Financial Statements.
As of June 1, 2009, the Company suspended all new product sales in Japan. Prior to June 1, 2009,
the Company offered certain variable annuity products in Japan with both a GMDB and a GMIB. For
the in-force block of Japan business, declines in equity markets as well as a strengthening of the
Japanese yen in comparison to the U.S. dollar and other currencies may increase the Companys
exposure to these guaranteed benefits. This increased exposure may be significant in extreme
market scenarios. The Company accounts for these GMDB and GMIB liabilities under SOP 03-1.
The Companys total gross exposure (i.e., before reinsurance) to these GMDBs and GMIBs offered in
Japan as of June 30, 2009 is $6.9 billion. The Company will incur these guaranteed death or
income benefits in the future only if the contract holder has an in-the-money guaranteed benefit at
either the time of their death or if the account value is insufficient to fund the guaranteed
living benefits. The Company currently reinsures 17% of these death benefit guarantees. Under
certain of these reinsurance agreements, the reinsurers exposure is subject to an annual cap. For
these products, the Companys retained net amount at risk is $5.8 billion, as of June 30, 2009.
For additional information on the Companys GMDB/GMIB liability, see Note 7 of Notes to Condensed
Consolidated Financial Statements.
149
Lifes Product Guarantee Accounting Models
The accounting for various living benefit and death benefit guarantees is significantly different
and influences the form of risk management employed by the Company. GMWBs meet the definition of
an embedded derivative under SFAS 133 and are recorded at fair value under SFAS 157, incorporating
changes in equity indices and equity index volatility, with changes in fair value recorded in
earnings. However, for other benefit guarantees, certain contract features that define how the
contract holder can access the value and substance of the guaranteed benefit change the accounting
from SFAS 133 to SOP 03-1. For contracts where the contract holder can only obtain the value of
the guaranteed benefit upon the occurrence of an insurable event such as death (GMDB) or when the
benefit received is in substance a long-term financing (GMIB), the accounting for the benefit is
prescribed by SOP 03-1.
As a result of these significant accounting differences, the liability for guarantees recorded
under SOP 03-1 is significantly different than if it was recorded under SFAS 133 and vice versa.
In addition, the conditions in the capital markets in Japan versus those in the U.S. are
sufficiently different that if the Companys GMWB product currently offered in the U.S. were
offered in Japan, the capital market conditions in Japan would have a significant impact on the
valuation of the GMWB, irrespective of the accounting model. The same would hold true if the
Companys GMIB product currently offered in Japan were to be offered in the U.S. Capital market
conditions in the U.S. would have a significant impact on the valuation of the GMIB.
Lifes Equity Product Risk Management
The Company has made considerable investment in analyzing current and potential future market risk
exposures arising from a number of factors, including but not limited to; product guarantees (GMDB,
GMWB, and GMIB), equity market and interest rate risks (in the U.S., U.K., and Japan), and foreign
currency exchange rates. The Company evaluates these risks individually and, increasingly, in the
aggregate to determine the risk profiles of all of its products and to judge their potential
impacts on financial metrics including U.S. GAAP earnings and statutory surplus. The Company
suspended all new product sales in Japan as of June 1, 2009 and in the U.K as of May 8, 2009. The
Company continues to manage the product risk of all in-force blocks of business including the
equity market, interest rate and foreign currency exchange risks embedded in these product
guarantees through a combination of product design, reinsurance, customized derivatives, and
dynamic hedging and macro hedging programs.
In consideration of current market conditions, the Companys risk management program for the U.S.
variable annuity market in the near term will include redesigned product features and offerings
which serve to lessen the financial risk of the product guarantees and increased rider fees charged
for the product guarantees. Depending upon competitors reactions with respect to product suites
and related rider charges, the Companys strategies of reducing product risk and increasing fees
may cause a further decline in market share.
Reinsurance
The Company uses reinsurance to manage the risk exposure for a portion of contracts issued with
GMWB riders prior to the third quarter of 2003 and, in addition, in 2008, the Company entered into
a reinsurance agreement to reinsure GMWB risks associated with a block of business sold between the
third quarter of 2003 and the second quarter of 2006. The Companys GMWB reinsurance is accounted
for as a freestanding derivative and is reported at fair value under SFAS 157.
The Company also uses reinsurance to manage the risk exposure for a majority of the death benefit
riders issued in the U.S. and a portion of the death benefit riders issued in Japan.
Derivative Hedging Programs
The Company maintains derivative hedging programs for its product guarantee risk to meet multiple,
and in some cases, competing risk management objectives, including providing protection against
tail scenario equity market events, providing resources to pay product guarantee claims, and
minimizing U.S. GAAP earnings volatility, statutory surplus volatility and other economic metrics.
For reinsurance and derivatives, the Company retains credit risk associated with the third parties.
Refer to the preceding Credit Risk section for the Companys discussion of credit risk.
The Company is continually exploring new ways and new markets to manage or layoff the capital
markets and policyholder behavior risks associated with its U.S. GMWB living benefits. During 2007
and 2008, the Company entered into customized derivative contracts to hedge certain capital market
risk components for the remaining term of specific blocks of non-reinsured U.S. GMWB riders. These
customized derivative contracts provide protection from capital markets risks based on policyholder
behavior assumptions specified by the Company at the inception of the derivative transactions. The
Company retains the risk for actual policyholder behavior that is different from assumptions within
the customized derivatives.
The Companys dynamic hedging program uses derivative instruments to manage the U.S. GAAP earnings
volatility associated with variable annuity product guarantees including equity market declines,
equity implied volatility, declines in interest rates and foreign currency exchange risk. The
Company uses hedging instruments including: interest rate futures and swaps; S&P 500, NASDAQ and
EAFE index put options; total return swaps; and futures contracts. The dynamic hedging program
involves a detailed monitoring of policyholder behavior and capital markets conditions on a daily
basis and rebalancing of the hedge position as needed depending upon the risk strategy employed.
While the Company actively manages this dynamic hedging program, increased U.S. GAAP earnings
volatility may result from factors including, but not limited to, policyholder behavior, capital
markets dislocation or discontinuity, divergence between the performance of the underlying funds
and the hedging indices, and the relative emphasis placed on various risk management objectives.
150
The Companys macro hedge program uses derivative instruments to partially hedge the statutory
tail scenario risk associated primarily with its U.S. and Japan living and death benefit statutory
reserves, providing an additional measure of protection, under tail scenarios, on statutory surplus
and the associated RBC ratios. A consequence of the macro hedge program will be additional cost
and volatility, under non-tail scenarios, as the macro hedge is intended to partially hedge certain
equity-market sensitive liabilities calculated under statutory accounting (see Capital Resources
and Liquidity) and changes in the value of the derivatives may not be closely aligned to changes in
liabilities determined in accordance with U.S. GAAP, causing volatility in U.S. GAAP earnings
including significant losses in periods of equity market growth.
In the first and second quarters of 2009, the rebalancing of variable annuity hedging programs
resulted in the sale of certain derivative positions, a portion of which proceeds were used to
purchase other derivatives for the protection of statutory surplus and the associated target RBC
ratios. The Company maintains hedge positions on the S&P 500 index and the U.S. dollar/yen
exchange rate to economically hedge statutory reserves and to provide protection of statutory
surplus arising primarily from GMDB and GMWB obligations. Refer to Note 5 of Notes to Condensed
Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information on hedging derivatives.
The following table summarizes the Companys U.S. GMWB account value by type of risk management
strategy as of June 30, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GMWB |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Account |
|
|
% of GMWB |
|
Risk Management Strategy |
|
Duration |
|
Value |
|
|
Account Value |
|
Entire GMWB risk reinsured with a third party |
|
Life of the product |
|
$ |
10,254 |
|
|
|
26 |
% |
Capital markets risk transferred
to a third party behavior risk retained by the Company |
|
Designed to cover the effective life of the product |
|
|
10,086 |
|
|
|
25 |
% |
Dynamic hedging of capital markets risk
using various derivative instruments [1] |
|
Weighted average of 5 years |
|
|
19,660 |
|
|
|
49 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
40,000 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1] |
|
Through the second quarter of 2009, the Company continued to maintain a reduced level of
dynamic hedge protection on U.S. GAAP earnings while placing a greater relative emphasis on
the protection of statutory surplus. This shift in emphasis includes the macro hedge program. |
Based on the construction of our derivative hedging program (both dynamic and macro hedge) as of June 30, 2009, which
can change based on capital market conditions, notional amounts and other factors and has changed as we have disclosed
elsewhere, an independent change in the following capital market factors is likely to have the following impacts. Each
of the sensitivities set forth below is estimated individually, without consideration of any correlation among the key
assumptions. Therefore, it would be inappropriate to take each of the sensitivities below and add them together in an
attempt to estimate the volatility in our variable annuity hedging program. In addition, there are other factors,
including policyholder behavior, which could materially impact the GMWB liability. As a result, actual net changes in
the value of the GMWB liability, the related dynamic hedging program derivative assets and the macro hedge program
derivative assets may vary materially from those calculated using only the sensitivities disclosed below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Impact on |
|
|
|
Hedging Program |
|
Capital Market Factor |
|
Pre-Tax/DAC Gain (Loss) |
|
Equity markets decrease 1% [1] |
|
$ |
25 |
|
Volatility increases 1% [2] |
|
$ |
(38 |
) |
Interest rates decrease 1 basis point [3] |
|
$ |
(2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1] |
|
Represents the aggregate net impact of a 1% decrease in each of the S&P 500, NASDAQ and EAFE indices. |
|
[2] |
|
Represents the aggregate
net impact of a 1% increase in blended implied volatility that is
generally skewed towards longer durations of each of the S&P 500, NASDAQ and EAFE indices. |
|
[3] |
|
Represents the aggregate net impact of a 1 basis point parallel shift on the LIBOR yield curve. |
Equity Risk Impact on Statutory Capital and Risked Based Capital
See Capital Resources and Liquidity, Ratings for information on the equity risk impact on statutory
results.
Derivative Instruments
The Company utilizes a variety of derivative instruments, including swaps, caps, floors, forwards,
futures and options through one of four Company-approved objectives: to hedge risk arising from
interest rate, equity market, credit spread including issuer default, price or currency exchange
rate risk or volatility; to manage liquidity; to control transaction costs; or to enter into
replication transactions.
Further downgrades to the credit ratings of The Hartfords insurance operating companies may have
adverse implications for its use of derivatives including those used to hedge benefit guarantees of
variable annuities. In some cases, further downgrades may give derivative counterparties the
unilateral authority to cancel and settle outstanding derivative trades or require additional
collateral to be posted. In addition, further downgrades may result in counterparties becoming
unwilling to engage in additional over-the-counter (OTC) derivatives or may require
collateralization before entering into any new trades. This will restrict the supply of derivative
instruments commonly used to hedge variable annuity guarantees, particularly long-dated equity
derivatives and interest rate swaps. Under these circumstances, The Hartfords operating
subsidiaries could conduct hedging activity using available OTC derivatives as well as a
combination of cash and exchange-traded instruments.
151
CAPITAL RESOURCES AND LIQUIDITY
Capital resources and liquidity represent the overall financial strength of The Hartford and
the Life and Property & Casualty insurance operations and their ability to generate cash flows from
each of their business segments, borrow funds at competitive rates and raise new capital to meet
operating and growth needs over the next twelve months.
Liquidity Requirements and Sources of Capital
The Hartford Financial Services Group, Inc. (Holding Company)
The liquidity requirements of the holding company of The Hartford Financial Services Group, Inc.
(HFSG Holding Company) have been and will continue to be met by HFSG Holding Companys cash and
short-term investments of $3.6 billion at June 30, 2009, dividends from the Life and Property &
Casualty insurance operations, as well as the issuance of common stock, debt or other capital
securities and borrowings from its credit facilities. Expected liquidity requirements of the HFSG
Holding Company for the next twelve months include interest expense on debt of approximately $470,
maturity of senior notes of $275, payment to Allianz for a contingent liability of $200, common
stockholder dividends, subject to the discretion of the Board of Directors, of approximately $65,
and preferred stock dividends of approximately $170.
Debt
The Hartfords debt maturities over the next twelve months include $275 aggregate principal amount
of its 7.9% senior notes that mature in June 2010 and capital lease obligations of approximately
$71. For additional information regarding debt, see Notes 12 and 14 of Notes to Consolidated
Financial Statements in The Hartfords 2008 Form 10-K Annual Report.
Dividends
On July 16, 2009, The Hartfords Board of Directors declared a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per
common share payable on October 1, 2009 to common shareholders of record as of September 2, 2009.
Pension Plans and Other Postretirement Benefits
While the Company has significant discretion in making voluntary contributions to its U. S.
qualified defined benefit pension plan (the Plan), the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of
1974, as amended by the Pension Protection Act of 2006 and further amended by the Worker, Retiree,
and Employer Act of 2008, and Internal Revenue Code regulations mandate minimum contributions in
certain circumstances. The Company does not have a required minimum funding contribution for the
U.S. qualified defined benefit pension plan for 2009 and the funding requirements for all of the
pension plans are expected to be immaterial. The Company presently anticipates contributing
approximately $200 to its pension plans and other postretirement plans in 2009, based upon certain
economic and business assumptions. These assumptions include, but are not limited to, equity
market performance, changes in interest rates and the Companys other capital requirements.
Dividends from the Insurance Operations
Dividends to the HFSG Holding Company from its insurance subsidiaries are restricted. The payment
of dividends by Connecticut-domiciled insurers is limited under the insurance holding company laws
of Connecticut. These laws require notice to and approval by the state insurance commissioner for
the declaration or payment of any dividend, which, together with other dividends or distributions
made within the preceding twelve months, exceeds the greater of (i) 10% of the insurers
policyholder surplus as of December 31 of the preceding year or (ii) net income (or net gain from
operations, if such company is a life insurance company) for the twelve-month period ending on the
thirty-first day of December last preceding, in each case determined under statutory insurance
accounting principles. In addition, if any dividend of a Connecticut-domiciled insurer exceeds the
insurers earned surplus, it requires the prior approval of the Connecticut Insurance Commissioner.
The insurance holding company laws of the other jurisdictions in which The Hartfords insurance
subsidiaries are incorporated (or deemed commercially domiciled) generally contain similar
(although in certain instances somewhat more restrictive) limitations on the payment of dividends.
Through October 30, 2009, substantially all dividend payments from the Companys property-casualty
insurance subsidiaries will be subject to prior approval of the Connecticut Insurance Commissioner
due to extraordinary dividend limitations under the insurance holding company laws of Connecticut.
It is estimated that, beginning on October 31, 2009, the Companys property-casualty insurance
subsidiaries will be permitted to pay up to a maximum of approximately $1.3 billion in dividends to
the HFSG Holding Company in 2009 without prior approval from the applicable insurance commissioner.
With respect to dividends to Hartford Life, Inc. (HLI), an indirect wholly-owned subsidiary, it
is estimated that the Companys life insurance subsidiaries non-extraordinary dividend limitation
under the insurance holding company laws of Connecticut is approximately $614 in 2009. However,
because the life insurance subsidiaries earned surplus was $598 as of December 31, 2008, the
Companys life insurance subsidiaries will be permitted to pay dividends only up to this amount to
HLI in 2009 without prior approval from the applicable insurance commissioner. During 2009, HFSG
Holding Company and HLI received no dividends from the life insurance subsidiaries. For the six
months ended June 30, 2009, HFSG Holding Company received $97 in dividends from its
property-casualty insurance subsidiaries and through July 29, 2009, HFSG Holding Company received
an additional $30 in dividends from its property-casualty insurance subsidiaries.
152
Other Sources of Capital for the HFSG Holding Company
The Hartford endeavors to maintain a capital structure that provides financial and operational
flexibility to its insurance subsidiaries, ratings that support its competitive position in the
financial services marketplace (see the Ratings section below for further discussion), and
shareholder returns. As a result, the Company may from time to time raise capital from the
issuance of stock, debt or other capital securities and is continuously evaluating strategic
opportunities. The issuance of common stock, debt or other capital securities could result in the
dilution of shareholder interests or reduced net income due to additional interest expense.
Capital Purchase Program
On June 26, 2009, as part of the Capital Purchase Program (CPP) established by the U.S.
Department of the Treasury (Treasury) under the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008 (the
EESA), the Company entered into a Private Placement Purchase Agreement with Treasury pursuant to
which the Company issued and sold to the U.S. Treasury 3,400,000 shares of the Companys Fixed Rate
Cumulative Perpetual Preferred Stock, Series E, having a liquidation preference of $1,000 per share
(the Series E Preferred Stock), and a ten-year warrant to purchase up to 52,093,973 shares of the
Companys common stock, par value $.01 per share, at an initial exercise price of $9.79 per share,
for an aggregate purchase price of $3.4 billion. To satisfy a key eligibility requirement for
participation in the CPP, The Hartford acquired Federal Trust Corporation and has agreed with OTS
to serve as a source of strength to its wholly-owned subsidiary Federal Trust Bank (FTB), which
included the contribution of $185 of CPP funds to FTB in the second quarter of 2009 and could
require even further contributions of additional capital to FTB in the future. In addition, The
Hartford has contributed $500 of the CPP funds to its indirect wholly-owned subsidiary Hartford
Life Insurance Company. The remaining $2.7 billion is held at the HFSG Holding Company in a
segregated account.
Cumulative dividends on the Series E Preferred Stock will accrue on the liquidation preference at a
rate of 5% per annum for the first five years, and at a rate of 9% per annum thereafter. The Series
E Preferred Stock has no maturity date and ranks senior to the Companys common stock. The Series
E Preferred Stock is non-voting. Payments on the cumulative dividends are approximately $170 over
the next twelve months. The cumulative dividends on preferred stock and related accretion of
discount on preferred stock will reduce net income available to common shareholders.
Discretionary Equity Issuance Program
On June 12, 2009, the Company announced that it had commenced a discretionary equity issuance
program, and in accordance with that program entered into an equity distribution agreement pursuant
to which it will offer up to 60 million shares of its common stock from time to time for aggregate
sales proceeds of up to $750. The Hartford intends to use net proceeds of sales under the program
for general corporate purposes, to strengthen our capital position and for the possible repurchases
of outstanding debt securities. Through July 29, 2009, The Hartford has issued 1.3 million shares
of common stock with net proceeds of $16 under this program. The Company has paid $0.2 in
commissions to Goldman Sachs & Co. as sales agent for the discretionary equity issuance program.
Shelf Registrations
On April 11, 2007, The Hartford filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission an automatic
shelf registration statement (Registration No. 333-142044) for the potential offering and sale of
debt and equity securities. The registration statement allows for the following types of
securities to be offered: (i) debt securities, preferred stock, common stock, depositary shares,
warrants, stock purchase contracts, stock purchase units and junior subordinated deferrable
interest debentures of the Company, and (ii) preferred securities of any of one or more capital
trusts organized by The Hartford (The Hartford Trusts). The Company may enter into guarantees
with respect to the preferred securities of any of The Hartford Trusts. In that The Hartford is a
well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 under the Securities Act of 1933, the
registration statement went effective immediately upon filing and The Hartford may offer and sell
an unlimited amount of securities under the registration statement during the three-year life of
the shelf.
Contingent Capital Facility
On February 12, 2007, The Hartford entered into a put option agreement (the Put Option Agreement)
with Glen Meadow ABC Trust, a Delaware statutory trust (the ABC Trust), and LaSalle Bank National
Association, as put option calculation agent. The Put Option Agreement provides The Hartford with
the right to require the ABC Trust, at any time and from time to time, to purchase The Hartfords
junior subordinated notes (the Notes) in a maximum aggregate principal amount not to exceed $500.
Under the Put Option Agreement, The Hartford will pay the ABC Trust premiums on a periodic basis,
calculated with respect to the aggregate principal amount of Notes that The Hartford had the right
to put to the ABC Trust for such period. The Hartford has agreed to reimburse the ABC Trust for
certain fees and ordinary expenses. The Company holds a variable interest in the ABC Trust where
the Company is not the primary beneficiary. As a result, the Company did not consolidate the ABC
Trust, as they did not meet the consolidation requirements under FASB Interpretation No. 46
(revised December 2003), Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities, an interpretation of ARB No.
51 (FIN 46(R)). As of June 30, 2009, The Hartford has not exercised its right to require ABC
Trust to purchase the Notes. As a result, the Notes remain a source of capital for the HFSG
Holding Company.
153
Commercial Paper, Revolving Credit Facility and Line of Credit
The table below details the Companys short-term debt programs and the applicable balances
outstanding.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maximum Available As of |
|
|
Outstanding As of |
|
|
|
Effective |
|
|
Expiration |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
Description |
|
Date |
|
|
Date |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Commercial Paper |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Hartford |
|
|
11/10/86 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
$ |
2,000 |
|
|
$ |
2,000 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
374 |
|
Revolving Credit Facility |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5-year revolving credit facility |
|
|
8/9/07 |
|
|
|
8/9/12 |
|
|
|
1,900 |
|
|
|
1,900 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Line of Credit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Life Japan Operations [1] |
|
|
9/18/02 |
|
|
|
1/5/10 |
|
|
|
52 |
|
|
|
55 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Commercial Paper, Revolving
Credit Facility and Line of Credit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
3,952 |
|
|
$ |
3,955 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
374 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1] |
|
As of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, the line of credit in yen was ¥5 billion. |
The revolving credit facility provides for up to $1.9 billion of unsecured credit through
August 9, 2012, which excludes a $100 commitment from an affiliate of Lehman Brothers. Of the total
availability under the revolving credit facility, up to $100 is available to support letters of
credit issued on behalf of The Hartford or other subsidiaries of The Hartford. Under the revolving
credit facility, the Company must maintain a minimum level of consolidated net worth of $12.5
billion. At June 30, 2009, the consolidated net worth of the Company as calculated in accordance
with the terms of the credit facility was $21.8 billion. The definition of consolidated net worth
under the terms of the credit facility, excludes AOCI and includes the Companys outstanding junior
subordinated debentures and perpetual preferred securities, net of discount. In addition, the
Company must not exceed a maximum ratio of debt to capitalization of 40%. At June 30, 2009, as
calculated in accordance with the terms of the credit facility, the Companys debt to
capitalization ratio was 15.9%. Quarterly, the Company certifies compliance with the financial
covenants for the syndicate of participating financial institutions. As of June 30, 2009, the
Company was in compliance with all such covenants.
While The Hartfords maximum borrowings available under its commercial paper program are $2.0
billion, the Company is dependent upon market conditions, including recent market conditions, to
access short-term financing through the issuance of commercial paper
to investors. Due to recent market conditions, as of June 30,
2009, the Company has no commercial paper outstanding.
Derivative Commitments
Certain of the Companys derivative agreements contain provisions that are tied to the financial
strength ratings of the individual legal entity that entered into the derivative agreement as set
by nationally recognized statistical rating agencies. If the insurance operating entitys
financial strength were to fall below certain ratings, the counterparties to the derivative
agreements could demand immediate and ongoing full collateralization and in certain instances
demand immediate settlement of all outstanding derivative positions traded under each impacted
bilateral agreement. The settlement amount is determined by netting the derivative positions
transacted under each agreement. If the termination rights were to be exercised by the
counterparties, it could impact the insurance operating entitys ability to conduct hedging
activities by increasing the associated costs and decreasing the willingness of counterparties to
transact with the insurance operating entity. The aggregate fair value of all derivative
instruments with credit-risk-related contingent features that are in a net liability position as of
June 30, 2009, is $695. Of this $695, the insurance operating entities have posted collateral of
$594 in the normal course of business. Based on derivative market values as of June 30, 2009, a
downgrade of one level below the current financial strength ratings by either Moodys or S&P could
require approximately an additional $45 to be posted as collateral. Based on derivative market
values as of June 30, 2009, a downgrade by either Moodys or S&P of two levels below the insurance
operating entities current financial strength ratings could require approximately an additional
$80 of assets to be posted as collateral. These collateral amounts could change as derivative
market values change, as a result of changes in our hedging activities or to the extent changes in
contractual terms are negotiated. The nature of the collateral that we may be required to post is
primarily in the form of U.S. Treasury bills and U.S. Treasury notes.
The table below presents the aggregate notional amount and fair value of derivative relationships
that could be subject to immediate termination in the event of further rating agency downgrades.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of June 30, 2009 |
|
Ratings levels |
|
Notional Amount |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
Either BBB+ or Baa1 |
|
$ |
4,801 |
|
|
$ |
149 |
|
Both BBB+ and Baa1 [1] [2] |
|
$ |
13,474 |
|
|
$ |
586 |
|
|
|
|
[1] |
|
The notional amount and fair value include both the scenario where
only one rating agency takes action to this level as well as where
both rating agencies take action to this level.
|
[2] |
|
The notional and fair value amounts include a customized GMWB
derivative with a notional amount of $5.0 billion and a fair value
of $233, for which the Company has a contractual right to make a
collateral payment in the amount of approximately $57 to prevent
its termination. |
154
Insurance Operations
Current and expected patterns of claim frequency and severity or surrenders may change from period
to period but continue to be within historical norms and, therefore, the Companys insurance
operations current liquidity position is considered to be sufficient to meet anticipated demands
over the next twelve months, including any obligations related to the Companys restructuring
activities. For a discussion and tabular presentation of the Companys current contractual
obligations by period, refer to Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements and Aggregate Contractual
Obligations within the Capital Resources and Liquidity section of the MD&A included in The
Hartfords 2008 Form 10-K Annual Report.
The principal sources of operating funds are premiums, fees earned from assets under management and
investment income, while investing cash flows originate from maturities and sales of invested
assets. The primary uses of funds are to pay claims, claim adjustment expenses, commissions and
other underwriting expenses, to purchase new investments and to make dividend payments to the HFSG
Holding Company. The Companys insurance operations also participate in securities lending
programs to generate additional income. Through these programs, the Company loans fixed income
securities to third-party borrowers in exchange for cash collateral. Those loaned securities may
be returned to the Company at various maturity dates, at which time the Company would be required
to return the cash collateral. If the loaned securities had been returned to the Company as of
June 30, 2009, the Companys Life and Property & Casualty operating subsidiaries would have been
required to fund the return of cash collateral of $707 and $0, respectively, out of operating
funds, short-term investment holdings or, if necessary, from the sale of fixed maturity
investments.
Property & Casualty holds fixed maturity securities including a significant short-term investment
position (securities with maturities of one year or less at the time of purchase) to meet liquidity
needs. As of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, Property & Casualty held total fixed maturity
investments of $22.2 billion and $21.4 billion, respectively, of which $1.5 billion and $1.6
billion were short-term investments, respectively. As of June 30, 2009, Property & Casualtys cash
and short-term investments of $1.8 billion, included $5 of collateral received from, and held on
behalf of, derivative counterparties. Property & Casualty also held $709 of U.S. Treasuries, of
which $136 had been pledged to derivative counterparties.
Liquidity requirements that are unable to be funded by Property & Casualtys short-term investments
would be satisfied with current operating funds, including premiums received or through the sale of
invested assets. A sale of invested assets could result in significant realized losses.
As of June 30, 2009, Lifes total contractholder obligations were $288.0 billion. Of the total
contractholder obligations, approximately $219.4 billion were held in separate accounts, within
mutual funds or were held in international statutory separate accounts. Mutual funds are not
recorded on Lifes balance sheet. The remaining $68.6 billion was held in the Companys general
account supported by Lifes general account invested assets of $61.5 billion, including a
significant short-term investment position to meet liquidity needs. As of June 30, 2009 and
December 31, 2008, Life held total fixed maturity investments of $51.3 billion and $52.1 billion,
respectively, of which $7.4 billion and $6.9 billion were short-term investments, respectively. As
of June 30, 2009, Lifes cash and short-term investments of $9.6 billion, included $1.2 billion of
collateral received from, and held on behalf of, derivative counterparties and $578 of collateral
pledged to derivative counterparties, as well as $746 of cash associated with the Japanese variable
annuity business which has an offsetting amount in other policyholder funds and benefits payable
International variable annuities. Life also held $3.5 billion of U.S. Treasury securities, of
which $499 had been pledged to derivative counterparties.
In the event customers elect to surrender separate account assets, international statutory separate
accounts or retail mutual funds, Life will use the proceeds from the sale of the assets to fund the
surrender and Lifes liquidity position will not be impacted. In many instances Life will receive
a percentage of the surrender amount as compensation for early surrender (surrender charge),
increasing Lifes liquidity position. In addition, a surrender of variable annuity separate
account or general account assets (see below) will decrease Lifes obligation for payments on
guaranteed living and death benefits.
Capital resources available to fund liquidity, upon contract holder surrender, are a function of
the legal entity in which the liquidity requirement resides. Generally, obligations of Group
Benefits will be funded by Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company; Individual Annuity and
Individual Life obligations will be generally funded by both Hartford Life Insurance Company and
Hartford Life and Annuity Insurance Company; obligations of Retirement and Institutional will be
generally funded by Hartford Life Insurance Company; and obligations of International will be
generally funded by the legal entity in the country in which the obligation was generated.
Of the $68.6 billion of contractholder obligations held in the general account, $33.7 billion
relates to contracts without a surrender provision and/or fixed payout dates such as payout
annuities or institutional notes, other than guaranteed investment products with a market value
adjustment feature (discussed below) or surrenders of term life, group benefit contracts or death
and living benefit reserves for which surrenders will have no current effect on Lifes liquidity
requirements.
155
A further $10.9 billion relates to Lifes Retail Fixed Market Value Adjusted (MVA) annuities that
are held in a statutory separate account, but under U.S. GAAP are recorded in the general account
as Fixed MVA annuity contract holders are subject to the Companys credit risk. In the statutory
separate account, Life is required to maintain invested assets with a fair value equal to the
market value adjusted surrender value of the Fixed MVA contract. In the event assets decline in
value at a greater rate than the market value adjusted surrender value of the Fixed MVA contract,
Life is required to contribute additional capital to the statutory separate account. Life will
fund these required contributions with operating cash flows or short-term investments. In the
event that operating cash flows or short-term investments are not sufficient to fund required
contributions, the Company may have to sell other invested assets at a loss, potentially resulting
in a decrease in statutory surplus. As the fair value of invested assets in the statutory separate
account are generally equal to the market value adjusted surrender value of the Fixed MVA contract,
surrender of Fixed MVA annuities will have an insignificant impact on the liquidity requirements of
Life. International also has $2.6 billion of Fixed MVA annuities which, as a result of its market
value adjustment feature, similarly limit Lifes liquidity requirements in the event of surrender.
Approximately $1.5 billion of guaranteed investment contracts (GIC) are subject to discontinuance
provisions which allow the policyholders to terminate their contracts prior to scheduled maturity
at the lesser of the book value or market value. Generally, the market value adjustment is
reflective of changes in interest rates and credit spreads. As a result, the market value
adjustment feature in the GIC serves to protect the Company from interest rate risks and limit
Lifes liquidity requirements in the event of a surrender. Approximately $1.7 billion of funding
agreements allow the policyholders to terminate at book value without a market value adjustment
after a defined notice period typically of 13 months. All policyholders with this provision have
exercised it, and the associated account value will be paid out by December 31, 2009 and will be
funded by cash flows from Institutional operations or existing short-term investments within the
Institutional investment portfolio.
Surrenders of, or policy loans taken from, as applicable, the remaining $18.2 billion of general
account liabilities, which include the general account option for Retails individual variable
annuities and Individual Lifes variable life contracts, the general account option for Retirement
Plan annuities and universal life contracts sold by Individual Life may be funded through operating
cash flows of Life, available short-term investments, or Life may be required to sell fixed
maturity investments to fund the surrender payment. Sales of fixed maturity investments could
result in the recognition of significant realized losses and insufficient proceeds to fully fund
the surrender amount. In this circumstance, Life may need to take other actions, including
enforcing certain contract provisions which could restrict surrenders and/or slow or defer payouts.
Securities Lending
The Company participates in securities lending programs to generate additional income. Through
these programs, certain domestic fixed income securities are loaned from the Companys portfolio to
qualifying third party borrowers in return for collateral in the form of cash or U.S. government
securities. Borrowers of these securities provide collateral of 102% of the market value of the
loaned securities at the time of the loan and can return the securities to the Company for cash at
varying maturity dates. The market value of the loaned securities is monitored and additional
collateral is obtained if the market value of the collateral falls below 100% of the market value
of the loaned securities. As of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, under terms of securities
lending programs, the fair value of loaned securities was approximately $695 and $2.9 billion,
respectively. As of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, the Company held collateral associated
with the loaned securities in the amount of $707 and $3.0 billion, respectively. The Company
reduced its securities lending program by $2.2 billion since December 31, 2008 and plans to
eliminate the term lending program by the end of third quarter 2009.
The following table represents when the borrowers can return the loaned securities to the Company
and, in turn, when the collateral would be returned to the borrower.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Collateral |
|
|
|
June 30, 2009 |
|
Thirty days or less |
|
$ |
416 |
|
Thirty-one to ninety days |
|
|
291 |
|
Over three to six months |
|
|
|
|
Over six to nine months |
|
|
|
|
Over nine months to one year |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total [1] |
|
$ |
707 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1] |
|
Includes $426 of collateral associated with the term lending program. |
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements and Aggregate Contractual Obligations
There have been no material changes to the Companys off-balance sheet arrangements and aggregate
contractual obligations since the filing of the Companys 2008 Form 10-K Annual Report.
156
Capitalization
The capital structure of The Hartford as of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008 consisted of debt
and stockholders equity, summarized as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
Short-term
debt (includes current maturities of long-term debt and capital
lease obligations) |
|
$ |
342 |
|
|
$ |
398 |
|
|
|
(14 |
%) |
Long-term debt |
|
|
5,490 |
|
|
|
5,823 |
|
|
|
(6 |
%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total debt [1] |
|
|
5,832 |
|
|
|
6,221 |
|
|
|
(6 |
%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity excluding accumulated other comprehensive loss, net
of tax (AOCI) |
|
|
20,052 |
|
|
|
16,788 |
|
|
|
19 |
% |
|
AOCI, net of tax |
|
|
(6,610 |
) |
|
|
(7,520 |
) |
|
|
12 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
$ |
13,442 |
|
|
$ |
9,268 |
|
|
|
45 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total capitalization including AOCI |
|
$ |
19,274 |
|
|
$ |
15,489 |
|
|
|
24 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt to stockholders equity |
|
|
43 |
% |
|
|
67 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
Debt to capitalization |
|
|
30 |
% |
|
|
40 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1] |
|
Total debt of the Company excludes $1.2 billion of consumer notes as of June 30, 2009 and
December 31, 2008 and $149 of Federal Home Loan Bank advances recorded in other liabilities as
of June 30, 2009 that were acquired through the purchase of Federal Trust Corporation in the
second quarter of 2009. |
The Hartfords total capitalization increased $3.8 billion, or 24%, from December 31, 2008 to June
30, 2009 primarily due to the following:
|
|
|
Stockholders equity excluding AOCI,
net of tax
|
|
Increased $3.3 billion
primarily due to the issuance of
$3.4 billion in preferred stock and
warrants to the U.S. Treasury as a
part of the CPP, cumulative effect
of accounting change of $912, and
reclassification of warrants from
other liabilities to equity and
extension of warrants term of $186
partially offset by a net loss of
$1.2 billion. See Notes 1 and 13
for additional information on the
cumulative effect of accounting
change and issuance of preferred
stock and warrants to the U.S.
Treasury as a part of the CPP. |
|
|
|
AOCI, net of tax
|
|
Increased $910 primarily due
to decreases in unrealized losses on
available-for-sale securities of
$2.2 billion, partially offset by a
cumulative effect of accounting
change of $912 and an increase in
unrealized losses on cash-flow
hedging instruments of $368. |
|
|
|
Total debt
|
|
Total debt has decreased due
to the repayment of commercial paper
of $375 and payments on capital
lease obligations in 2009. |
For additional information on debt, stockholders equity and AOCI, see Notes 14, 15 and 16,
respectively, of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements in The Hartfords 2008 Form
10-K Annual Report.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
Cash Flows |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
$ |
1,986 |
|
|
$ |
2,261 |
|
Net cash used for investing activities |
|
$ |
(3,557 |
) |
|
$ |
(4,317 |
) |
Net cash provided by financing activities |
|
$ |
2,338 |
|
|
$ |
2,002 |
|
Cash end of period |
|
$ |
2,558 |
|
|
$ |
2,084 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The decrease in cash from operating activities compared to the prior year period was primarily the
result of lower premiums and lower earnings on fixed maturities. Net purchases of
available-for-sale securities continue to account for the majority of cash used for investing
activities. Cash from financing activities increased primarily due to issuances of preferred stock
and warrants to the U.S. Treasury for $3.4 billion in 2009 and treasury stock acquired in 2008,
partially offset by issuance of long-term debt and consumer notes in 2008 and repayments of
commercial paper in 2009. Additionally, net flows on investment and universal life-type contracts
decreased in 2009 compared to 2008.
Operating cash flows for the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 have been adequate to meet
liquidity requirements.
Equity Markets
For a discussion of the potential impact of the equity markets on capital and liquidity, see the
Capital Markets Risk Management section of the MD&A under Market Risk above.
157
Ratings
Ratings are an important factor in establishing the competitive position in the insurance and
financial services marketplace. There can be no assurance that the Companys ratings will continue
for any given period of time or that they will not be changed. In the event the Companys ratings
are downgraded, the level of revenues or the persistency of the Companys business may be adversely
impacted.
On May 12, 2009, Fitch downgraded the Companys senior debt to BBB- from BBB, the junior
subordinated debentures to BB+ from BBB-, and the Consumer Notes from A- to BBB+. Fitch also
downgraded the insurance financial strength rating of the Companys primary life insurance
subsidiaries to A- from A. Fitch affirmed the property/casualty insurance subsidiaries rating of
A+. On June 16, 2009, Fitch affirmed the financial strength ratings of the life and
property/casualty insurance subsidiaries and maintained their negative outlook for all ratings
except Junior Subordinated Debentures, which it placed under review with negative implications. On
June 30, 2009, Fitch downgraded the Junior Subordinated Debentures rating to BB from BB+. The
rating outlook is negative.
On May 18, 2009, Moodys affirmed the senior debt and insurance financial strength ratings and
changed the outlook to developing, from negative.
On June 15, 2009, S&P revised the outlook on the senior debt ratings and financial strength ratings
on all life and property/casualty operating subsidiaries to stable from negative.
The following table summarizes The Hartfords significant member companies financial ratings from
the major independent rating organizations as of July 22, 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Insurance Financial Strength Ratings: |
|
A.M. Best |
|
Fitch |
|
Standard & Poors |
|
Moodys |
Hartford Fire Insurance Company |
|
A |
|
A+ |
|
A |
|
A2 |
Hartford Life Insurance Company |
|
A |
|
A- |
|
A |
|
A3 |
Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company |
|
A |
|
A- |
|
A |
|
A3 |
Hartford Life and Annuity Insurance Company |
|
A |
|
A- |
|
A |
|
A3 |
Hartford Life Insurance KK (Japan) |
|
|
|
|
|
A |
|
|
Hartford Life Limited (Ireland) |
|
|
|
|
|
A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Ratings: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Hartford Financial Services Group, Inc.: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior debt |
|
bbb+ |
|
BBB- |
|
BBB |
|
Baa3 |
Commercial paper |
|
AMB-2 |
|
F2 |
|
A-2 |
|
P-3 |
Junior subordinated debentures |
|
bbb- |
|
BB |
|
BB+ |
|
Ba1 |
Hartford Life, Inc.: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior debt |
|
bbb+ |
|
BBB- |
|
BBB |
|
Baa3 |
Hartford Life Insurance Company: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short term rating |
|
|
|
|
|
A-1 |
|
P-2 |
Consumer notes |
|
a |
|
BBB+ |
|
A |
|
Baa1 |
These ratings are not a recommendation to buy or hold any of The Hartfords securities and they may
be revised or revoked at any time at the sole discretion of the rating organization.
The agencies consider many factors in determining the final rating of an insurance company. One
consideration is the relative level of statutory surplus necessary to support the business written.
Statutory surplus represents the capital of the insurance company reported in accordance with
accounting practices prescribed by the applicable state insurance department.
158
The table below sets forth statutory surplus for the Companys insurance companies. The statutory
surplus amount as of December 31, 2008 in the table below is based on actual statutory filings with
the applicable regulatory authorities. The statutory surplus amount as of June 30, 2009 is an
estimate, as the second quarter 2009 statutory filings have not yet been made.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Life Operations |
|
$ |
6,068 |
|
|
$ |
6,046 |
|
Japan Life Operations |
|
|
1,886 |
|
|
|
1,718 |
|
Property & Casualty Operations |
|
|
6,362 |
|
|
|
6,012 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
14,316 |
|
|
$ |
13,776 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company has received approval from the Connecticut Insurance Department regarding the use of
two permitted practices in the statutory financial statements of its Connecticut-domiciled life
insurance subsidiaries. The first permitted practice relates to the statutory accounting for
deferred income taxes. The second permitted practice relates to the statutory reserving
requirements for variable annuities with guaranteed living benefit riders. These permitted
practices will expire in the fourth quarter of 2009.
As of June 30, 2009, the Company received a benefit to Statutory surplus of $532 related to both
the deferred income tax permitted practice and the reserving permitted practice. When the
reserving permitted practice expires in 2009, the Company will be required to adopt VA CARVM, which
will differ from the current reserving standards. While it is difficult to predict what the
ultimate impact of adopting VA CARVM will be at December 31,
2009, it is estimated that the adoption will result in increased required reserves.
Contingencies
Legal Proceedings For a discussion regarding contingencies related to The Hartfords legal
proceedings, see Part II, Item 1, Legal Proceedings.
Legislative Developments
On May 11, 2009, the Obama Administration released the General Explanations of the
Administrations Revenue Proposals. Although the Administration has not released proposed
statutory language, the General Explanations of the Administrations Revenue Proposals includes
proposals which if enacted, would affect the taxation of life insurance companies and certain life
insurance products. In particular, the proposals would affect the treatment of corporate owned life
insurance policies or COLIs by limiting the availability of certain interest deductions for
companies that purchase those policies. The proposals would also change the method used to
determine the amount of dividend income received by a life insurance company on assets held in
separate accounts used to support products, including variable life insurance and variable annuity
contracts, that is eligible for the dividends-received deduction, or DRD. The DRD reduces the
amount of dividend income subject to tax and is a significant component of the difference between
the Companys actual tax expense and expected amount determined using the federal statutory tax
rate of 35%. If proposals of this type were enacted, the Companys sale of COLI, variable
annuities, and variable life products could be adversely affected and the Companys actual tax
expense could increase, reducing earnings.
ACCOUNTING STANDARDS
For a discussion of accounting standards, see Note 1 of Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements included in The Hartfords 2008 Form 10-K Annual Report and Note 1 of Notes to Condensed
Consolidated Financial Statements.
Item 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
The information contained in the Capital Markets Risk Management section of Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations is incorporated herein by
reference.
Item 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures
The Companys principal executive officer and its principal financial officer, based on their
evaluation of the Companys disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rule
13a-15(e)) have concluded that the Companys disclosure controls and procedures are effective for
the purposes set forth in the definition thereof in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(e) as of June 30,
2009.
Changes in internal control over financial reporting
There was no change in the Companys internal control over financial reporting that occurred during
the Companys second fiscal quarter of 2009 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely
to materially affect, the Companys internal control over financial reporting. On June 24, 2009,
the Company acquired Federal Trust Corporation (FTC). At June 30, 2009, FTCs business
operations were operating under pre-acquisition systems of internal control over financial
reporting. As part of our ongoing internal control process, we have been and will continue to
evaluate and implement changes to processes, information technology systems and other components of
internal control over financial reporting related to the acquired business.
159
Part II. OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
(Dollar amounts in millions)
Litigation
The Hartford is involved in claims litigation arising in the ordinary course of business, both as a
liability insurer defending or providing indemnity for third-party claims brought against insureds
and as an insurer defending coverage claims brought against it. The Hartford accounts for such
activity through the establishment of unpaid loss and loss adjustment expense reserves. Subject to
the uncertainties discussed below under the caption Asbestos and Environmental Claims, management
expects that the ultimate liability, if any, with respect to such ordinary-course claims
litigation, after consideration of provisions made for potential losses and costs of defense, will
not be material to the consolidated financial condition, results of operations or cash flows of The
Hartford.
The Hartford is also involved in other kinds of legal actions, some of which assert claims for
substantial amounts. These actions include, among others, putative state and federal class actions
seeking certification of a state or national class. Such putative class actions have alleged, for
example, underpayment of claims or improper underwriting practices in connection with various kinds
of insurance policies, such as personal and commercial automobile, property, life and inland
marine; improper sales practices in connection with the sale of life insurance and other investment
products; and improper fee arrangements in connection with investment products and structured
settlements. The Hartford also is involved in individual actions in which punitive damages are
sought, such as claims alleging bad faith in the handling of insurance claims. Like many other
insurers, The Hartford also has been joined in actions by asbestos plaintiffs asserting, among
other things, that insurers had a duty to protect the public from the dangers of asbestos and that
insurers committed unfair trade practices by asserting defenses on behalf of their policyholders in
the underlying asbestos cases. Management expects that the ultimate liability, if any, with
respect to such lawsuits, after consideration of provisions made for estimated losses, will not be
material to the consolidated financial condition of The Hartford. Nonetheless, given the large or
indeterminate amounts sought in certain of these actions, and the inherent unpredictability of
litigation, an adverse outcome in certain matters could, from time to time, have a material adverse
effect on the Companys consolidated results of operations or cash flows in particular quarterly or
annual periods.
Broker Compensation Litigation Following the New York Attorney Generals filing of a civil
complaint against Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc., and Marsh, Inc. (collectively, Marsh) in
October 2004 alleging that certain insurance companies, including The Hartford, participated with
Marsh in arrangements to submit inflated bids for business insurance and paid contingent
commissions to ensure that Marsh would direct business to them, private plaintiffs brought several
lawsuits against the Company predicated on the allegations in the Marsh complaint, to which the
Company was not party. Among these is a multidistrict litigation in the United States District
Court for the District of New Jersey. There are two consolidated amended complaints filed in the
multidistrict litigation, one related to conduct in connection with the sale of property-casualty
insurance and the other related to alleged conduct in connection with the sale of group benefits
products. The Company and various of its subsidiaries are named in both complaints. The
complaints assert, on behalf of a putative class of persons who purchased insurance through broker
defendants, claims under the Sherman Act, the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act
(RICO), state law, and in the case of the group benefits complaint, claims under the Employee
Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA). The claims are predicated upon allegedly
undisclosed or otherwise improper payments of contingent commissions to the broker defendants to
steer business to the insurance company defendants. The district court has dismissed the Sherman
Act and RICO claims in both complaints for failure to state a claim and has granted the defendants
motions for summary judgment on the ERISA claims in the group-benefits products complaint. The
district court further has declined to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the state law
claims, has dismissed those state law claims without prejudice, and has closed both cases. The
plaintiffs have appealed the dismissal of the claims in both consolidated amended complaints,
except the ERISA claims.
The Company is also a defendant in two consolidated securities
actions and two consolidated
derivative actions filed in the United States
District Court for the District of Connecticut. The
consolidated securities actions assert claims on behalf of a putative class of shareholders
alleging that the Company and certain of its executive officers violated Section 10(b) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 by failing to disclose to the investing public that
The Hartfords business and growth was predicated on the unlawful activity alleged in the New York
Attorney Generals complaint against Marsh. The consolidated derivative actions, brought by
shareholders on behalf of the Company against its directors and an additional executive officer,
allege that the defendants knew adverse non-public information about the activities alleged in the
Marsh complaint and concealed and misappropriated that information to make profitable stock trades
in violation of their duties to the Company. In July 2006, the district court granted defendants
motion to dismiss the consolidated securities actions, and the plaintiffs appealed. In November
2008, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit vacated the decision and remanded
the case to the district court. In May 2009, the parties reached an agreement in principle to
settle the consolidated securities actions for an immaterial amount. The settlement is subject to
certain contingencies, including the execution of a stipulation of settlement and the preliminary
and final approval of the court. Defendants filed a motion to dismiss the consolidated derivative
actions in May 2005. In July 2009, the parties reached an agreement in principle to settle the
consolidated derivative actions for an immaterial amount, subject to the execution of a written
settlement agreement and approval of the court.
160
In September 2007, the Ohio Attorney General filed a civil action in Ohio state court alleging that
certain insurance companies, including The Hartford, conspired with Marsh in violation of Ohios
antitrust statute. The trial court denied defendants motion to dismiss the complaint in July
2008. The Company disputes the allegations and intends to defend this action vigorously.
Investment and Savings Plan ERISA Class Action Litigation In November and December 2008,
following a decline in the share price of the Companys common stock, seven putative class action
lawsuits were filed in the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut on behalf
of certain participants in the Companys Investment and Savings Plan (the Plan), which offers the
Companys common stock as one of many investment options. These lawsuits have been consolidated,
and a consolidated amended class-action complaint was filed in March 2009, alleging that the
Company and certain of its officers and employees violated ERISA by allowing the Plans
participants to invest in the Companys common stock and by failing to disclose to the Plans
participants information about the Companys financial condition. The lawsuit seeks restitution or
damages for losses arising from the investment of the Plans assets in the Companys common stock
during the period from December 10, 2007 to the present. The Company disputes the allegations and
intends to defend the actions vigorously.
Structured Settlement Class Action In October 2005, a putative nationwide class action was filed
in the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut against the Company and several
of its subsidiaries on behalf of persons who had asserted claims against an insured of a Hartford
property & casualty insurance company that resulted in a settlement in which some or all of the
settlement amount was structured to afford a schedule of future payments of specified amounts
funded by an annuity from a Hartford life insurance company (Structured Settlements). The
operative complaint alleges that since 1997 the Company has systematically deprived the settling
claimants of the value of their damages recoveries by secretly deducting 15% of the annuity premium
of every Structured Settlement to cover brokers commissions, other fees and costs, taxes, and a
profit for the annuity provider, and asserts claims under RICO and state law. The plaintiffs seek
compensatory damages, punitive damages, pre-judgment interest, attorneys fees and costs, and
injunctive or other equitable relief. The Company vigorously denies that any claimant was misled
or otherwise received less than the amount specified in the structured-settlement agreements. In
March 2009, the district court certified a class for the RICO and fraud claims composed of all
persons, other than those represented by a plaintiffs broker, who entered into a Structured
Settlement since 1997 and received certain written representations about the cost or value of the
settlement. The district court declined to certify a class for the breach-of-contract and
unjust-enrichment claims. The Company has petitioned the United States Court of Appeals for the
Second Circuit for permission to file an interlocutory appeal of the class-certification ruling.
Proceedings in the district court are stayed until proceedings in the Second Circuit conclude.
Fair Credit Reporting Act Class Action In February 2007, the United States District Court for
the District of Oregon gave final approval of the Companys settlement of a lawsuit brought on
behalf of a class of homeowners and automobile policy holders alleging that the Company willfully
violated the Fair Credit Reporting Act by failing to send appropriate notices to new customers
whose initial rates were higher than they would have been had the customer had a more favorable
credit report. The Company paid approximately $84.3 to eligible claimants and their counsel in
connection with the settlement, and sought reimbursement from the Companys Excess Professional
Liability Insurance Program for the portion of the settlement in excess of the Companys $10
self-insured retention. Certain insurance carriers participating in that program disputed coverage
for the settlement, and one of the excess insurers commenced an arbitration that resulted in an
award in the Companys favor and payments to the Company of approximately $30.1, thereby exhausting
the primary and first-layer excess policies. In June 2009, the second-layer excess carriers
commenced an arbitration to resolve the dispute over coverage for the remainder of the amounts paid
by the Company. Management believes it is probable that the Companys coverage position ultimately
will be sustained.
Asbestos and Environmental Claims As discussed in Note 12, Commitments and Contingencies, of the
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements under the caption Asbestos and Environmental Claims,
included in the Companys 2008 Form 10-K Annual Report, The Hartford continues to receive asbestos
and environmental claims that involve significant uncertainty regarding policy coverage issues.
Regarding these claims, The Hartford continually reviews its overall reserve levels and reinsurance
coverages, as well as the methodologies it uses to estimate its exposures. Because of the
significant uncertainties that limit the ability of insurers and reinsurers to estimate the
ultimate reserves necessary for unpaid losses and related expenses, particularly those related to
asbestos, the ultimate liabilities may exceed the currently recorded reserves. Any such additional
liability cannot be reasonably estimated now but could be material to The Hartfords consolidated
operating results, financial condition and liquidity.
Shareholder
Demand Like the boards of directors of many other companies, The Hartfords board of
directors (the Board) has received a demand from SEIU Pension Plans Master Trust, which purports
to be a current holder of the Companys common stock. The demand requests the Board to bring suit
to recover alleged excessive compensation paid to senior executives of the Company from 2005
through the present and to change the Companys executive compensation structure. The Board is
conducting an investigation of the allegations in the demand.
161
Item 1A. RISK FACTORS
The risk factors set forth below update the risk factors section previously disclosed in Item
1A of Part I of the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 and
in Item1A of Part II of the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31,
2009.
Persistent stress in global financial markets and recessionary economic conditions worldwide have
continued to pressure our capital position and adversely affect our business and results in
material ways. Our participation in the Capital Purchase Program (the CPP) of the U.S. Treasury
Department (Treasury) may not be sufficient to stabilize our ratings, particularly if challenging economic conditions persist, and we could be required to take other material actions,
including potential capital raising activities, that may adversely affect our business and results
or trading prices for our common stock.
Persistent stress in financial markets and recessionary global economic conditions have continued
to pressure our capital position and adversely affect our operations and results in the second
quarter of 2009, and the impact and potential effects of governmental stimulus, budgetary and other
financial measures in the worlds major economies remain uncertain. Our capital position is likely
to remain under pressure if the recessionary economic environment is prolonged. In addition, our
long-term debt and financial strength ratings have been downgraded by the major rating agencies
several times in 2009. If we cannot stabilize our ratings and strengthen our capital resources,
our business, results and prospects could continue to be adversely affected, particularly if
economic conditions remain challenging. Certain of our Life and Property-Casualty lines of business
have been particularly adversely affected by these conditions.
Because financial markets have remained volatile in 2009, we also expect continuing pressure on
returns in our life and property and casualty investment portfolios. Fluctuations in the fixed
income or equity markets could result in investment losses that impact the Companys financial
condition, statutory capital and results of operations through realized and unrealized losses. In
addition, investments we own have experienced and could continue to experience rating agency
downgrades. These rating agency downgrades have negatively impacted and could continue to
negatively impact our statutory capital and RBC ratios.
Although we closed on a definitive agreement to participate in the CPP in the amount of $3.4
billion, if economic conditions worsen, our participation in the CPP may not be sufficient
to stabilize our ratings and to mitigate and reduce risks associated with various business lines
and our investment portfolio. Depending on the circumstances at the time, there may be limited
alternatives available to us.
To strengthen our capital position, we could seek to raise additional capital in the public or
private markets. In June 2009, we entered into a distribution agreement in connection with the
launch of our discretionary equity issuance program which provides for the sales of an
indeterminate number of shares of common stock up to the number of shares that will result in gross
proceeds of $750, subject to a maximum of 60 million shares. Further, we may in the future seek to
access the public or private capital markets to repay the funds received through our participation
in the CPP. We cannot assure you that we would have access to the capital markets on favorable
terms or at all. Moreover, the issuance of any additional shares of common stock or securities
convertible into or exchangeable for common stock or that represent the right to receive common
stock, or the exercise of such securities, could be substantially dilutive to stockholders of our
common stock or could require us to make additional payments under our investment agreement with
Allianz. Holders of our shares of common stock are not entitled to any preemptive rights by virtue
of their status as stockholders that entitle holders to purchase their pro rata share of any
offering of shares of any class or series and, therefore, such sales or offerings could result in
increased dilution to our stockholders. Trading prices for our common stock could decline as a
result of sales of shares of our common stock or securities convertible into or exchangeable for
common stock or in anticipation of such sales.
Although we closed on a definitive investment agreement to participate in the CPP in the amount of
$3.4 billion during the second quarter of 2009, our participation will subject us to additional
restrictions, oversight and costs, and have other potential consequences, that could materially
affect our business, results and prospects.
In the second quarter of 2009, we closed on a definitive investment agreement to participate in the
Treasurys CPP in the amount of $3.4 billion. Although participation in the CPP is an important
component of our strategy to enhance our capital position and financial flexibility, our
participation will subject us to additional restrictions, oversight and costs, and have other
potential consequences, that could materially affect our business, results and prospects, including
the following:
|
|
Our acceptance of CPP funds could cause us to be perceived as having greater capital needs
and weaker overall financial prospects than those of our competitors that have stated that
they do not intend to participate in the CPP, which could adversely affect our competitive
position and results, including new product sales and policy retention rates, and depress
trading prices for our common stock. |
162
|
|
As a condition to our participation in CPP, we acquired Federal Trust Corporation, the
parent company of Federal Trust Bank (FTB), a federally chartered, FDIC-insured thrift, in
the second quarter of 2009. As a result, as a savings and loan holding company, we will be
subject to regulation, supervision and examination by the Office of Thrift Supervision (OTS)
and OTS reporting requirements. In addition, as previously reported, we are required to be a
source of strength to FTB, which could require further capital
contributions. As a savings and loan holding company, we are subject to the requirement that our
activities be financially-related activities as defined by federal law (which includes
insurance activities), and OTS has enforcement authority over us, including the right to
pursue administrative orders or penalties and the right to restrict or prohibit activities
determined by OTS to be a serious risk to FTB. |
|
|
Receipt of CPP funds subjects us to restrictions, oversight and costs that may have an
adverse impact on our business, financial condition, results or the trading prices for our
common stock. For example, the recently enacted American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009
contains significant limitations on the amount and form of bonus, retention and other
incentive compensation that participants in the CPP may pay to executive officers and senior
management. These provisions may adversely affect our ability to attract and retain executive
officers and other key personnel. Other regulatory initiatives applicable to participants in
federal funding programs may also be forthcoming as the U.S. government continues to address
dislocations in the financial markets. Compliance with such current and potential regulation
and scrutiny may significantly increase our costs, impede the efficiency of our internal
business processes, require us to increase our regulatory capital and limit our ability to
pursue business opportunities in an efficient manner. |
|
|
Future federal statutes may adversely affect the terms of the CPP that are applicable to us
and the Treasury may amend the terms of our agreement with them unilaterally if required by
future statutes, including in a manner materially adverse to us. |
The decisions that we have made in connection with our review of strategic alternatives may not
achieve the anticipated benefits, may not be sufficient to stabilize our ratings and mitigate and
reduce risks associated with various business lines and our investment portfolio, particularly if
the current market conditions persist or deteriorate.
In the second quarter of 2009, we completed a review of several strategic alternatives with a goal
of preserving capital, reducing risk and stabilizing our ratings. These alternatives included the
potential restructuring, discontinuation or disposition of various business lines. Following that
review, we determined to suspend all new sales in Japan and the United Kingdom and to close our
German branch. While we are pursuing options for our Institutional business with the goals of
preserving capital and reducing risks, we determined not to pursue other alternatives in light of
market conditions and our expectations with respect to our core portfolio of protection businesses,
particularly property and casualty, group benefits and life insurance. We also determined to retain
our wealth management and retirement business, including mutual funds, retirement plans and a
restructured annuities business. These decisions may not achieve the anticipated benefits and could
have an adverse effect on sales in certain lines of business, and even taken together with our
participation in the CPP, may not be sufficient to stabilize our ratings and mitigate and reduce
risks associated with our various business lines.
We recently adjusted our risk management program relating to products we offer with guaranteed
benefits to emphasize protection of statutory surplus, which will likely result in greater U.S.
GAAP volatility in our earnings and potentially material charges to net income in periods of rising
equity market pricing levels.
Some of the products offered by our life businesses, especially variable annuities, offer certain
guaranteed benefits which, in the event of a decline in equity markets, would not only result in
lower earnings, but will also increase our exposure to liability for benefit claims. During 2008 and
early 2009, our liability for guaranteed benefits increased significantly as equity markets
declined. We are also subject to equity market volatility related to these benefits, especially the
guaranteed minimum death benefit (GMDB), guaranteed minimum withdrawal benefit (GMWB),
guaranteed minimum accumulation benefit (GMAB) and guaranteed minimum income benefit (GMIB)
offered with variable annuity products. As of June 30, 2009, the liability for GMWB and GMAB was
$3.3 billion and $(2), respectively. At that date, the liability for GMIB and GMDB was a combined
$1.1 billion, net of reinsurance. We use reinsurance structures and have modified benefit features
to mitigate the exposure associated with GMDB. We also use reinsurance in combination with a
modification of benefit features and derivative instruments to attempt to minimize the claim
exposure and to reduce the volatility of net income associated with the GMWB liability. However,
due to the severe economic conditions in the fourth quarter of 2008, we adjusted our risk
management program to place greater relative emphasis on the protection of statutory surplus. This
shift in relative emphasis will likely result in greater U.S. GAAP earnings volatility and, based
upon the types of hedging instruments used, can result in potentially material charges to net
income in periods of rising equity market pricing levels. While we believe that these actions have
improved the efficiency of our risk management related to these benefits, we remain liable for the
guaranteed benefits in the event that reinsurers or derivative counterparties are unable or
unwilling to pay. We are also subject to the risk that other management procedures prove
ineffective or that unanticipated policyholder behavior, combined with adverse market events,
produces economic losses beyond the scope of the risk management techniques employed, which
individually or collectively may have a material adverse effect on our consolidated results of
operations, financial condition and cash flows.
163
The markets in the United States and elsewhere have been experiencing extreme and unprecedented
volatility and disruption. We are exposed to significant financial and capital markets risk,
including changes in interest rates, credit spreads, equity prices, foreign exchange rates and
global real estate market deterioration which may have a material adverse effect on our results of
operations, financial condition and liquidity.
The markets in the United States and elsewhere have been experiencing and in certain markets are
expected to continue to experience extreme and unprecedented volatility and disruption. We are
exposed to significant financial and capital markets risk, including changes in interest rates,
credit spreads, equity prices foreign currency exchange rates and global real estate market
deterioration.
One important exposure to equity risk relates to the potential for lower earnings associated with
certain of our Life businesses, such as variable annuities, where fee income is earned based upon
the fair value of the assets under management. The significant declines in equity markets over the
last twelve to eighteen months have negatively impacted assets under management. As a result, fee
income earned from those assets has also been negatively impacted. In addition, certain of our Life
products offer guaranteed benefits which increase our potential obligation and statutory capital
exposure should equity markets decline. Due to declines in equity markets, our liability for these
guaranteed benefits has significantly increased and our statutory capital position has decreased.
Further sustained declines in equity markets during 2009 and beyond may result in the need to
devote significant additional capital to support these products. We are also exposed to interest
rate and equity risk based upon the discount rate and expected long-term rate of return assumptions
associated with our pension and other post-retirement benefit obligations. Sustained declines in
long-term interest rates or equity returns are likely to have a negative effect on the funded
status of these plans.
Our exposure to interest rate risk relates primarily to the market price and cash flow variability
associated with changes in interest rates. A rise in interest rates, in the absence of other
countervailing changes, will increase the net unrealized loss position of our investment portfolio
and, if long-term interest rates rise dramatically within a six to twelve month time period,
certain of our Life businesses may be exposed to disintermediation risk. Disintermediation risk
refers to the risk that our policyholders may surrender their contracts in a rising interest rate
environment, requiring us to liquidate assets in an unrealized loss position. Due to the long-term
nature of the liabilities associated with certain of our Life businesses, such as structured
settlements and guaranteed benefits on variable annuities, sustained declines in long term interest
rates may subject us to reinvestment risks and increased hedging costs. In other situations,
declines in interest rates or changes in credit spreads may result in reducing the duration of
certain Life liabilities, creating asset liability duration mismatches and lower spread income.
Our exposure to credit spreads primarily relates to market price and cash flow variability
associated with changes in credit spreads. The overall widening of credit spreads over the last
twelve to eighteen months has contributed to the increase in the net unrealized loss position of
our investment portfolio which, as of June 30, 2009, was $11.5 billion, before DAC effects and tax,
and has also contributed to increases in other-than-temporary impairments. If issuer credit spreads
widen significantly or retain historically wide levels over an extended period of time, these
effects will likely exacerbate, resulting in greater and additional other-than-temporary
impairments. Increased losses have also occurred due to the volatility in credit spreads. When
credit spreads widen, we incur losses associated with the credit derivatives where the Company
assumes exposure. When credit spreads tighten, we incur losses associated with derivatives where
the Company has purchased credit protection. If credit spreads tighten significantly, the
Companys net investment income associated with new purchases of fixed maturities may be reduced.
In addition, a reduction in market liquidity has made it difficult to value certain of our
securities as trading has become less frequent. As such, valuations may include assumptions or
estimates that may be more susceptible to significant period to period changes which could have a
material adverse effect on our consolidated results of operations or financial condition.
Our statutory surplus is also impacted by widening credit spreads as a result of the accounting for
the assets and liabilities on our fixed market value adjusted (MVA) annuities. Statutory separate
account assets supporting the fixed MVA annuities are recorded at fair value. In determining the
statutory reserve for the fixed MVA annuities we are required to use current crediting rates in the
U.S. and Japanese LIBOR in Japan. In many capital market scenarios, current crediting rates in the
U.S. are highly correlated with market rates implicit in the fair value of statutory separate
account assets. As a result, the change in the statutory reserve from period to period will likely
substantially offset the change in the fair value of the statutory separate account assets.
However, in periods of volatile credit markets, such as we are now experiencing, actual credit
spreads on investment assets may increase sharply for certain sub-sectors of the overall credit
market, resulting in statutory separate account asset market value losses. As actual credit spreads
are not fully reflected in current crediting rates in the U.S. or Japanese LIBOR in Japan, the
calculation of statutory reserves will not substantially offset the change in fair value of the
statutory separate account assets resulting in reductions in statutory surplus. This has resulted
and may continue to result in the need to devote significant additional capital to support the
product.
164
Our primary foreign currency exchange risks are related to net income from foreign operations,
non U.S. dollar denominated investments, investments in foreign subsidiaries, our yen-denominated
individual fixed annuity product, and certain guaranteed benefits associated with the Japan and
U.K. variable annuities. These risks relate to potential decreases in value and income resulting
from a strengthening or weakening in foreign exchange rates versus the U.S. dollar. In general, the
weakening of foreign currencies versus the U.S. dollar will unfavorably affect net income from
foreign operations, the value of non-U.S. dollar denominated investments, investments in foreign
subsidiaries and realized gains or losses on the yen denominated individual fixed annuity product.
In comparison, a strengthening of the Japanese yen or British pound in comparison to the U.S.
dollar and other currencies will increase our exposure to the guarantee benefits associated with
the Japan or U.K. variable annuities. Correspondingly, a strengthening of the U.S. dollar compared
to other currencies will increase our exposure to the U.S. variable annuity guarantee benefits
where policyholders have elected to invest in international funds.
Our real estate market exposure includes investments in CMBS, RMBS, CRE CDOs, mortgage and real
estate partnerships, and mortgage loans. Deterioration in the global real estate market, as
evidenced by increases in property vacancy rates, delinquencies and foreclosures, has negatively
impacted property values and sources of refinancing which could result in further reductions in net
investment income associated with real estate partnerships, impairments of real estate backed
securities and increases in our valuation allowance for mortgage loans.
If significant, further declines in equity prices, changes in U.S. interest rates, changes in
credit spreads, the strengthening or weakening of foreign currencies against the U.S. dollar, and
global real estate market deterioration, individually or in combination, could continue to have a
material adverse effect on our consolidated results of operations, financial condition and
liquidity both directly and indirectly by creating competitive and other pressures such as employee
retention issues and the potential loss of distributors for our products.
In addition, in the conduct of our business, there could be scenarios where in order to reduce
risks, fulfill our obligations or to raise incremental liquidity, we would sell assets at a loss
for a variety of reasons including the unrealized loss position in our overall investment portfolio
and the lack of liquidity in the credit markets. These scenarios could include selling assets as
the Company reduces its securities lending program.
Declines in equity markets, changes in interest rates and credit spreads and global real estate
market deterioration can also negatively impact the fair values of each of our segments. If a
significant decline in the fair value of a segment occurred and this resulted in an excess of that
segments book value over fair value, the goodwill assigned to that segment might be impaired and
could cause the Company to record a charge to impair a part or all of the related goodwill assets.
Item 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS
Purchases of Equity Securities by the Issuer
The following table summarizes the Companys repurchases of its common stock for the three months
ended June 30, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Approximate Dollar |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Number of |
|
|
Value of Shares that |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares Purchased as |
|
|
May Yet Be |
|
|
|
Total Number |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Part of Publicly |
|
|
Purchased Under |
|
|
|
of Shares |
|
|
Average Price |
|
|
Announced Plans or |
|
|
the Plans or |
|
Period |
|
Purchased [1] |
|
|
Paid Per Share |
|
|
Programs |
|
|
Programs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions) |
|
April 1, 2009 April 30, 2009 |
|
|
584 |
|
|
$ |
9.79 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
807 |
|
May 1,
2009 May 31, 2009 |
|
|
194 |
|
|
$ |
12.14 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
807 |
|
June 1,
2009 June 30, 2009 |
|
|
390 |
|
|
$ |
11.54 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
807 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
1,168 |
|
|
$ |
10.76 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1] |
|
Represents shares acquired from employees of the Company primarily for tax withholding
purposes in connection with the Companys stock compensation plans. |
The Hartfords Board of Directors has authorized a $1 billion stock repurchase program. The
Companys repurchase authorization permits purchases of common stock, which may be in the open
market or through privately negotiated transactions. The Company also may enter into derivative
transactions to facilitate future repurchases of common stock. The timing of any future
repurchases will be dependent upon several factors, including the market price of the Companys
securities, the Companys capital position, consideration of the effect of any repurchases on the
Companys financial strength or credit ratings, restrictions arising from the Companys
participation in the CPP, and other corporate considerations. The repurchase program may be
modified, extended or terminated by the Board of Directors at any time.
165
Sales of Equity Securities by the Issuer
On June 26, 2009, as part of the CPP established by Treasury under the Emergency Economic
Stabilization Act of 2008, the Company entered into a Private Placement Purchase Agreement with
Treasury pursuant to which the Company issued and sold to Treasury, under an exemption from
registration pursuant to Rule 144A of the Securities Act of 1933, 3,400,000 shares of the Companys
Fixed Rate Cumulative Perpetual Preferred Stock, Series E, having a liquidation preference of
$1,000 per share, and a ten-year warrant to purchase up to 52,093,973 shares of the Companys
common stock, par value $0.01 per share, at an initial exercise price of $9.79 per share, for an
aggregate purchase price of $3.4 billion.
Discretionary equity issuance program
On June 12, 2009, the Company announced that it commenced a discretionary equity issuance program
under its automatic shelf registration statement (Registration No. 333-142044), and in accordance
with that program entered into an equity distribution agreement pursuant to which it is offering up
to 60 million shares of its common stock from time to time for aggregate sales proceeds of up to
$750. Through July 29, 2009, The Hartford has issued 1.3 million shares of common stock with net
proceeds of $16 under this program. The Company currently expects to use the proceeds from the
sale of its common stock from time to time under this program for general corporate purposes, to
strengthen the Companys capital position, and for possible repurchases of debt securities.
166
Item 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITIES HOLDERS
On May 27, 2009, The Hartford held its Annual Meeting of Stockholders. The following matters
were considered and voted upon: (1) the election of nine directors, each to serve on the Companys
Board of Directors until the next Annual Meeting of Stockholders and the election and
qualifications of his or her successor; (2) a proposal to ratify the appointment of the Companys
independent auditors, Deloitte & Touche LLP, for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2009; (3) a
proposal to amend the Companys amended and restated certificate of incorporation to increase the
number of authorized shares of common stock; and (4) a proposal to amend the Companys Employee
Stock Purchase Plan to increase the number of shares authorized thereunder.
Only stockholders of record as of the close of business on March 30, 2009 were entitled to vote at
the annual meeting. As of March 30, 2009, 325,437,677 shares of common stock of the Company were
outstanding and entitled to vote at the annual meeting. Set forth below is the vote tabulation
relating to the four items presented to the stockholders at the annual meeting:
|
(1) |
|
The stockholders elected each of the nine nominees to the Board of Directors: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Votes Cast |
|
Names of Director Nominees |
|
For |
|
|
Against |
|
|
Abstained |
|
Robert B. Allardice, III |
|
|
259,869,595 |
|
|
|
13,580,042 |
|
|
|
1,633,131 |
|
Ramani Ayer |
|
|
254,999,472 |
|
|
|
18,519,698 |
|
|
|
1,563,698 |
|
Trevor Fetter |
|
|
252,162,627 |
|
|
|
21,290,622 |
|
|
|
1,629,619 |
|
Edward J. Kelly, III |
|
|
252,189,228 |
|
|
|
21,305,841 |
|
|
|
1,587,800 |
|
Paul G. Kirk, Jr. |
|
|
249,956,627 |
|
|
|
23,593,971 |
|
|
|
1,532,270 |
|
Gail J. McGovern |
|
|
256,774,330 |
|
|
|
16,736,289 |
|
|
|
1,572,250 |
|
Michael G. Morris |
|
|
251,217,401 |
|
|
|
22,275,873 |
|
|
|
1,589,594 |
|
Charles B. Strauss |
|
|
257,573,356 |
|
|
|
15,901,933 |
|
|
|
1,607,579 |
|
H. Patrick Swygert |
|
|
248,684,769 |
|
|
|
24,774,020 |
|
|
|
1,624,079 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2) |
|
The stockholders ratified the appointment of the Companys independent auditors: |
|
|
|
|
|
Shares For: |
|
|
271,416,380 |
|
Shares Against: |
|
|
3,010,714 |
|
Shares Abstained: |
|
|
655,774 |
|
|
(3) |
|
The stockholders approved the amendment to the Companys amended and restated certificate of
incorporation: |
|
|
|
|
|
Shares For: |
|
|
237,729,423 |
|
Shares Against: |
|
|
36,377,434 |
|
Shares Abstained: |
|
|
976,011 |
|
|
(4) |
|
The stockholders approved the amendment to the Companys Employee Stock Purchase Plan: |
|
|
|
|
|
Shares For: |
|
|
202,533,006 |
|
Shares Against: |
|
|
4,748,436 |
|
Shares Abstained: |
|
|
353,201 |
|
Item 6. EXHIBITS
See Exhibits Index on page 169.
167
SIGNATURE
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Hartford Financial Services Group, Inc.
(Registrant)
|
|
Date: July 29, 2009 |
/s/ Beth A. Bombara
|
|
|
Beth A. Bombara |
|
|
Senior Vice President and
Controller
(Chief accounting officer and duly authorized signatory) |
|
168
THE HARTFORD FINANCIAL SERVICES GROUP, INC.
FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2009
FORM 10-Q
EXHIBITS INDEX
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit No. |
|
Description |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.01 |
|
|
Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of The Hartford Financial Services
Group, Inc. (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.01 to The Hartfords Current
Report on Form 8-K, filed June 2, 2009). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.02 |
|
|
Certificate of Designations of The Hartford Financial Services Group, Inc. with respect to
Series E Fixed Rate Cumulative Perpetual Preferred Stock, dated June 25, 2009 (incorporated
herein by reference to Exhibit 3.01 to The Hartfords Current Report on Form 8-K, filed
June 26, 2009). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.01 |
|
|
Warrant to Purchase Shares of Common Stock of The Hartford Financial Services Group, Inc.,
dated June 26, 2009 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.01 to The Hartfords
Current Report on Form 8-K, filed June 26, 2009). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.01 |
|
|
Letter Agreement, dated as of June 9, 2009, by and between The Hartford Financial
Services Group, Inc., Allianz SE and Allianz Finance II Luxembourg S.a.r.l. (incorporated
herein by reference to Exhibit 10.01 to The Hartfords Current Report on Form 8-K, filed
June 12, 2009). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.02 |
|
|
Letter Agreement including the Securities Purchase AgreementStandard Terms incorporated
therein, between The Hartford Financial Services Group, Inc. and The United States
Department of the Treasury, dated June 26, 2009 (incorporated herein by reference to
Exhibit 10.01 to The Hartfords Current Report on Form 8-K, filed June 26, 2009). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.03 |
|
|
Letter Agreement between The Hartford Financial Services Group, Inc. and The United
States Department of the Treasury, dated June 26, 2009 (incorporated herein by reference to
Exhibit 10.02 to The Hartfords Current Report on Form 8-K, filed June 26, 2009). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
15.01 |
|
|
Deloitte & Touche LLP Letter of Awareness. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.01 |
|
|
Certification of Ramani Ayer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.02 |
|
|
Certification of Lizabeth H. Zlatkus pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
32.01 |
|
|
Certification of Ramani Ayer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
32.02 |
|
|
Certification of Lizabeth H. Zlatkus pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
99.01 |
|
|
Equity Distribution Agreement, dated June 12, 2009, between The Hartford Financial
Services Group, Inc. and Goldman, Sachs & Co. (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit
99.01 to The Hartfords Current Report on Form 8-K, filed June 12, 2009). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
99.02 |
|
|
Press Release of The Hartford Financial Services Group, Inc. dated June 12, 2009
(incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 99.02 to The Hartfords Current Report on Form
8-K, filed June 12, 2009). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
99.03 |
|
|
Press Release of The Hartford Financial Services Group, Inc., dated June 26, 2009
(incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 99.01 to The Hartfords Current Report on Form
8-K, filed June 26, 2009). |
169