File No. __________

                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

                                WASHINGTON, D.C.

                                    FORM U-57

                 NOTIFICATION OF FOREIGN UTILITY COMPANY STATUS

                        Filed Under Section 33(a) of the
             Public Utility Holding Company Act of 1935, as amended

                          PSEG Poland Distribution B.V.
                      (Name of the foreign utility company)

                  PUBLIC SERVICE ENTERPRISE GROUP INCORPORATED
   (Name of filing company, if filed on behalf of a foreign utility company)

Item 1

Notification

Public Service Enterprise Group Incorporated  ("PSEG"), a holding company exempt
from the Public  Utility  Holding  Company Act of 1935, as amended (the "Holding
Company Act") pursuant to Section  3(a)(1)  thereof and the corporate  parent of
Public Service Electric and Gas Company ("PSE&G"), a "public-utility company" as
that  term is  defined  in the  Holding  Company  Act,  hereby  files  with  the
Securities and Exchange Commission ("Commission"), pursuant to Section 33 of the
Holding  Company  Act,  this Form U-57 on  behalf  of PSEG  Poland  Distribution
B.V.(1) ("PSEG Poland"),  an indirect owner of electrical  generation facilities
and provider of both  electricity-related  and non-electricity related services,
for the  purpose of  notifying  the  Commission  that PSEG Poland is, and hereby
claims status as, a "foreign  utility  company"  ("FUCO")  within the meaning of
Section 33 of the Holding Company Act.

As described further below,  PSEG Poland,  owns 74.63 % of the voting securities
of Elektrowina  Skawina Spolka Akcyjna  ("Skawina").(2)  Skawina owns generation
facilities  in Poland and provides  additional  services to its  affiliates  and
other third parties.

----------
(1) PSEG  Poland is a company  formed  under  the laws of The  Netherlands.  100
percent of the voting securities,  as defined in PUHCA, of PSEG Poland are owned
by PSEG Europe B.V., a wholly owned indirect subsidiary of PSEG.
(2) PSEG Poland may increase its ownership of the voting securities of Skawina.




PSEG  Poland  does  not own or  derive  any  part  of its  income,  directly  or
indirectly,  from the  generation,  transmission,  or  distribution  of electric
energy for sale or the  distribution  of natural or  manufactured  gas for heat,
light or power  within the United  States of  America,  and PSEG Poland is not a
public-utility  company operating in the United States of America, as such terms
are defined in the Holding Company Act.

ITEM 1

Name and Business Address of the Entity Claiming FUCO Status:

         PSEG Poland Distribution B.V.
         Weena 340
         3012 NJ Rotterdam
         The Netherlands

         Mailing address:

         Postbus 21850
         3001 AW Rotterdam
         The Netherlands

Description  of  the  Facilities  Used  for  the  Generation,  Transmission  and
Distribution of Electric Energy for Sale

Skawina  owns an  electrical  generation  facility  in  Krakow,  Poland  with an
electrical output of approximately 590 Mwe and thermal capacity of approximately
618 MWt (the "Facility"). All of the electrical energy generated by the Facility
(except for  in-plant  use) will be sold at  wholesale  to Zak(3)ad  Energetczny
Krakow, S.A, Zak(3)ad  Energetczny Tarnow S.A, Beskidzka  Energetyka S.A, Polish
Power  Distribution  Companies,  ELNORD and POLSKA ENERGIA,  Polish  electricity
trade  organizations  or  other  wholesale   purchasers.   In  addition,  it  is
anticipated that the thermal energy resulting from the generation of electricity
will be sold at wholesale to Miejskie  Przedsiebiorstwo  Energetyki Cieplnej S.A
in Krakow or other  wholesale  purchasers.  In addition it is  anticipated  that
Skawina will be selling capacity to Polskie Sieci Elektroenergetyczne, S.A., the
Polish Power Grid Company. Sales of thermal or electrical energy made at retail,
if any,  will be made to  entities  located  within  Poland  and no  thermal  or
electrical energy will be sold to any person or entity within the United States.

Ownership of Voting Securities:

74.63%  of the  voting  securities  of  Skawina  are  owned  by PSEG  Poland,  a
wholly-owned  indirect  subsidiary of PSEG. The remaining  voting  securities of
Skawina  are owned by The  State  Treasury  of the  Republic  of Poland  and the
employees of Skawina.


                                       2


ITEM 2

Domestic Associate Public-Utility Companies

PSE&G is Skawina's only domestic associate  public-utility company, as such term
is defined in Section 2 of the Holding Company Act.

PSE&G is a  wholly-owned  direct  subsidiary  of PSEG, a  publicly-held  holding
company,  exempt by rule under Section 3(a)(1) of the Holding Company Act. PSE&G
has not paid and will not pay for its  affiliate's  interest in, and will itself
have no interest in, Skawina.

EXHIBIT A

State Commission Certification - New Jersey

Exhibit A has been  omitted  for the State of New Jersey for  reasons  set forth
below, since the state certification requirement with regard to the State of New
Jersey is deemed  satisfied by Orders issued in 1986,  prior to the enactment of
Section 33(a)(2) of the Holding Company Act, by the Board of Public Utilities of
the State of New Jersey ("BPU"),  the only state commission having  jurisdiction
over the retail gas and  electricity  rates of PSE&G. In support of such claimed
exemption from state certification, PSEG incorporates by reference the BPU Order
of January 17, 1986,  entitled "Order Authorizing  Transfer of Capital Stock and
Approval of Merger",  as amended by the BPU and Order dated  November  13, 1986,
entitled  "Order  Authorizing  Transfer of Capital Stock and Approval of Merger"
also incorporated by reference.(3) PSEG asserts that such BPU Orders satisfy the
requirements of Section 33 (a)(2).

Section 33 (a)(2) requires that every state commission having  jurisdiction over
the  retail  electric  or gas  rates  of a  public-utility  company  that  is an
associate  company or an  affiliate  of an otherwise  exempted  foreign  utility
company must certify to the Securities and Exchange  Commission that it has "the
authority and resources to protect  ratepayers  subject to its  jurisdiction and
that it intends to exercise its authority."

----------
(3) PSEG has previously  relied on and filed paper copies with the Commission of
such BPU Orders as satisfaction of the state certification requirement. See U-57
filings  of  Public  Service   Enterprise  Group   Incorporated  on  behalf  of:
Turbogeneradores  Maracay,  C.A.  filed with the  Commission  on July 31,  1995;
Empresa  Distribuidora  de Energia Sur, S.A., filed with the Commission on April
22,  1997;  Empresa  Distribuidora  de  Energia  Norte,  S.A.,  filed  with  the
Commission  on April 22,  1997;  Companhia  Norte-Nordeste  de  Distribuicao  de
Energia  Electrica  filed with the  Commission  on October  22,  1997;  Turboven
Maracay Company filed with the Commission in October,  1998;  Turboven  Valencia
Company filed with the  Commission on October 15, 1998;  Turboven  Cagua Company
filed with the Commission on October 15, 1998;  Empresa  Distribuidora  La Plata
S.A.  filed with the  Commission  on November 4, 1998;  Chilquinta  Energia S.A.
filed with the  Commission  on June 8, 1999;  AES Parana  S.C.A.  filed with the
Commission  on July 12,  1999,  AES  Parana  Operations  S.R.L.  filed  with the
Commission on July 12, 1999; Luz del Sur S.A.A.  filed  electronically  with the
Commission on September 14, 1999;  Shanghai  Wei-Gang  Energy Company Ltd. filed
with the Commission on May 30, 2000;  Empresa  Distribuidora  de Electricidad de
Entre Rios S.A. , filed electronically with the Commission on December 28, 2000;
Sociedad Austral de Electricidad S.A., filed  electronically with the Commission
on August 30, 2001; and Dhofar Power Company SAOC, filed electronically with the
Commission on June 27, 2003.


                                       3


Section  33 (a) (2)  also  provides  that  this  requirement  "shall  be  deemed
satisfied"  if, prior to the enactment of Section 33 (a) (2), the relevant state
commission   had,   "on  the  basis  of   prescribed   conditions   of   general
applicability," determined that the ratepayers of the public utility company are
"adequately   insulated   from   the   effects   of   diversification   and  the
diversification would not impair the ability of the state commission to regulate
effectively the operations of such company."

PSE&G, an associate company or affiliate company of Skawina, is a public-utility
company that, among other things, distributes electric energy and natural gas at
retail in the United States.  As indicated  above, the retail rates of PSE&G are
regulated by the BPU. The BPU Orders  referenced above authorize the transfer of
PSE&G's issued and  outstanding  shares of common stock to a new holding company
to be formed - PSEG. This Order, as amended, commonly referred to as the Holding
Company  Order,  was and is generally  applicable  to all of PSEG's  non-utility
activities. The BPU (at pp. 3-6 of the January 17, 1986 Order) imposed seventeen
(17)  conditions  generally  applicable  to the  new  holding  company  and  its
subsidiaries.

The BPU additionally noted (at p. 9) that it can monitor PSE&G's inter-corporate
transactions with affiliates;  assure that utility assets are not transferred to
unregulated  affiliates and that the utility is adequately  compensated  for the
transfer of such  assets;  and assure  adequate  capitalization  by reducing the
earnings of PSE&G until the holding  company makes proper  capital  commitments.
Such Order stated (at p.8) the BPU's conclusion that:

"This Board has ample  statutory  authority  to regulate  all utility  activites
(sic) and, if required by existing facts or  circumstances,  to take  reasonable
and appropriate  action in order to resolve  regulatory  problems and to protect
the public."

The BPU further stated that:

"The Board's traditional regulatory powers will provide all the enforcement that
the Board will need to assure that PSE&G's  utility  operation and its customers
receive first priority, and that diversification by the Holding Company does not
affect the utility or its  customers.  The Board's  regulatory  tools will be at
least as effective when applied to PSE&G as part of a holding company  structure
as they would be if PSE&G were to embark on diversification through wholly-owned
subsidiaries."

The BPU concluded by finding inter alia (at p. 10) that:

      "(2) The proposed  conditions  set out in the joint Position and Agreement
entered into by the Petitioner and Staff are reasonable and appropriate, and, in
conjunction with existing statutes, provide this Board with sufficient means and
authority by which to properly regulate utility operations;

      (3) The proposed  restructuring will have no adverse impact upon the rates
charged to Petitioner's ratepayers, the employees of the utility or upon PSE&G's
ability to render safe, adequate and proper service . . ."


                                       4


Accordingly,  the BPU,  the sole state  commission  with  jurisdiction  over the
retail rates of PSE&G  determined,  as set forth in the BPU Orders, on the basis
of prescribed conditions of general applicability,  that the ratepayers of PSE&G
are  adequately   insulated  from  the  effects  of  diversification   and  that
diversification  would not impair the ability of the BPU to effectively regulate
the utility operations of PSE&G.

Conclusion

Accordingly,  PSEG Poland  satisfies the criteria set forth in Section 33(a) for
qualification as a foreign utility company.

The  undersigned  company  has duly caused  this  statement  to be signed on its
behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

                                                 Public Service Enterprise Group
                                                 Incorporated

                                                 By: /s/ James T. Foran
                                                 -------------------------------
                                                 James T. Foran
                                                 Associate General Counsel

Date: March 16, 2005


                                       5