UNITED STATES | ||
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION | ||
Washington, D.C. 20549 | ||
FORM N-CSR/A | ||
CERTIFIED SHAREHOLDER REPORT OF REGISTERED MANAGEMENT | ||
INVESTMENT COMPANIES | ||
Investment Company Act file number 811-5245 | ||
Dreyfus Strategic Municipals, Inc. | ||
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in charter) | ||
c/o The Dreyfus Corporation | ||
200 Park Avenue | ||
New York, New York 10166 | ||
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip code) | ||
Mark N. Jacobs, Esq. | ||
200 Park Avenue | ||
New York, New York 10166 | ||
(Name and address of agent for service) | ||
Registrant's telephone number, including area code: (212) 922-6000 | ||
Date of fiscal year end: | 9/30 | |
Date of reporting period: | 9/30/06 |
FORM N-CSR |
Item 1. | Reports to Stockholders. |
Dreyfus Strategic Municipals, Inc.
Protecting Your Privacy Our Pledge to You
THE FUND IS COMMITTED TO YOUR PRIVACY. On this page, you will find the Funds policies and practices for collecting, disclosing, and safeguarding nonpublic personal information, which may include financial or other customer information.These policies apply to individuals who purchase Fund shares for personal, family, or household purposes, or have done so in the past. This notification replaces all previous statements of the Funds consumer privacy policy, and may be amended at any time. Well keep you informed of changes as required by law.
YOUR ACCOUNT IS PROVIDED IN A SECURE ENVIRONMENT. The Fund maintains physical, electronic and procedural safeguards that comply with federal regulations to guard nonpublic personal information. The Funds agents and service providers have limited access to customer information based on their role in servicing your account.
THE FUND COLLECTS INFORMATION IN ORDER TO SERVICE AND ADMINISTER YOUR ACCOUNT.
The Fund collects a variety of nonpublic personal information, which may include:
THE FUND DOES NOT SHARE NONPUBLIC
PERSONAL INFORMATION WITH ANYONE, EXCEPT AS PERMITTED BY LAW.
Thank you for this opportunity to serve you.
The views expressed in this report reflect those of the portfolio manager only through the end of the period covered and do not necessarily represent the views of Dreyfus or any other person in the Dreyfus organization. Any such views are subject to change at any time based upon market or other conditions and Dreyfus disclaims any responsibility to update such views. These views may not be relied on as investment advice and, because investment decisions for a Dreyfus fund are based on numerous factors, may not be relied on as an indication of trading intent on behalf of any Dreyfus fund.
Not FDIC-Insured Not Bank-Guaranteed May Lose Value
Contents | ||
THE FUND | ||
|
|
|
2 | Letter from the Chairman | |
3 | Discussion of Fund Performance | |
6 | Selected Information | |
7 | Statement of Investments | |
25 | Statement of Financial Futures | |
26 | Statement of Assets and Liabilities | |
27 | Statement of Operations | |
28 | Statement of Changes in Net Assets | |
29 | Financial Highlights | |
30 | Notes to Financial Statements | |
38 | Report of Independent Registered | |
Public Accounting Firm | ||
40 | Additional Information | |
43 | Important Tax Information | |
44 | Proxy Results | |
45 | Board Members Information | |
48 | Officers of the Fund | |
53 | Officers and Directors | |
FOR MORE INFORMATION | ||
|
|
|
Back Cover |
Dreyfus |
Strategic Municipals, Inc. |
The Fund
LETTER FROM THE CHAIRMAN
Dear Shareholder:
We are pleased to present this annual report for Dreyfus Strategic Municipals, Inc., covering the 12-month period from October 1, 2005, through September 30, 2006.
After more than two years of steady and gradual increases, the Federal Reserve Board (the Fed) held short-term interest rates unchanged at its meetings in August and September.The Fed has indicated that the U.S. economy has moved to a slower-growth phase of its cycle, as evidenced by softening housing markets in many regions of the United States.Yet, energy prices have moderated from record highs, calming fears that the economy may fall into a full-blown recession.
Most sectors of the U.S. fixed-income market rallied in anticipation of and in response to the pause in the Feds tightening campaign, including municipal bonds. Investors apparently are optimistic that higher borrowing costs and moderating home values may wring current inflationary pressures from the economy. In addition, most states and municipalities have continued to report higher-than-expected tax receipts as a result of the recovering economy, helping to support the credit quality of many municipal bond issuers. As always, we encourage you to talk with your financial advisor about these and other developments to help ensure that your portfolio remains aligned with your current tax-managed needs and future investment goals.
For information about how the fund performed during the reporting period, as well as market perspectives, we have provided a Discussion of Fund Performance given by the funds portfolio manager.
Thank you for your continued confidence and support.
2 |
DISCUSSION OF FUND PERFORMANCE
W. Michael Petty, Portfolio Manager
How did Dreyfus Strategic Municipals perform during the reporting period?
For the 12-month period ended September 30, 2006, the fund achieved a total return of 6.92% (on a net asset value basis).1 During the same period, the fund provided income dividends of $0.52 per share, which is equal to a distribution rate of 5.66% .2
Municipal bonds rallied over the summer of 2006 as the Federal Reserve Board (the Fed) refrained from raising short-term interest rates and investors looked forward to a slower-growth economic environment, enabling the fund to post a competitive total return. Relatively high levels of income from the funds core holdings also helped drive its performance, but some of those seasoned bonds were redeemed early by their issuers. In addition, rising short-term interest rates resulted in higher borrowing costs for the funds auction preferred shares. These factors resulted in a reduction in the funds dividend in February 2006.
What is the funds investment approach?
The funds investment objective is to maximize current income exempt from federal income tax to the extent consistent with the preservation of capital. Under normal market conditions, the fund invests at least 80% of its net assets in municipal obligations. Generally, the fund invests at least 50% of its net assets in municipal bonds considered investment-grade or the unrated equivalent as determined by Dreyfus in the case of bonds, and in the two highest-rating categories or the unrated equivalent as determined by Dreyfus in the case of short-term obligations having or deemed to have maturities of less than one year.
To this end, we have constructed a portfolio derived from seeking income opportunities through analysis of each bonds structure, including paying close attention to each bonds yield, maturity and early redemption features.
The Fund 3
DISCUSSION OF FUND PERFORMANCE (continued) |
Over time, many of the funds relatively higher yielding bonds mature or are redeemed by their issuers, and we generally attempt to replace those bonds, as opportunities arise, with investments consistent with the funds investment policies.When we believe an opportunity exists, we also may seek to upgrade the portfolios investments with newly issued bonds that, in our opinion, have better structural or income characteristics than existing holdings.
What other factors influenced the funds performance?
Over the first half of the reporting period, investors low inflation expectations helped support municipal bond prices despite fairly robust levels of economic growth and rising short-term interest rates. In the spring of 2006, however, stronger labor markets, record oil prices and hawkish comments by some Fed members raised renewed concerns that inflation might be accelerating, and bond prices began to fall. Fortunately, these worries proved to be overblown as fuel prices declined and U.S. housing markets softened over the summer.The Fed lent credence to a more benign outlook for the economy and inflation when, after more than two years of steady rate hikes, it held short-term interest rates unchanged at its meetings in August and September.
Municipal bond prices also were supported by favorable supply-and-demand factors throughout the reporting period. Many states and municipalities received higher levels of tax revenue than originally projected, reducing their need to borrow. Consequently, the supply of newly issued municipal bonds fell compared to the same period one year earlier. Yet, demand remained robust from both individual and institutional investors seeking competitive levels of tax-free income.
As short-term interest rates rose, longer-term bond yields remained relatively stable, contributing to a narrowing of yield differences along the funds maturity spectrum. Later, longer-term bond yields fell while short-term rates remained stable, and yield differences narrowed further. The fund benefited from this trend by maintaining its focus on long-term, income-oriented bonds. The fund received especially
4 |
strong results from its lower-rated holdings, including municipal bonds backed by U.S. airlines and educational facilities. Our security selection strategy proved to be successful in the airline sector, as we chose securities from solvent carriers and avoided those from airlines that declared bankruptcy early in the reporting period.
On the other hand, the funds strong relative performance was eroded somewhat by higher borrowing costs related to its leveraging strategy, which relies on the issuance of auction preferred stock. In addition, as expected, some of the funds seasoned, higher-coupon holdings were redeemed early by their issuers, and we were unable to replace them with new securities with similar income characteristics.The fund consequently generated incrementally less income, requiring an adjustment to its dividend distribution rate in February 2006.
What is the funds current strategy?
Signs of a moderate economic slowdown suggest to us that the Fed is unlikely to raise or lower short-term interest rates over the foreseeable future. If current inflationary pressures wane and the U.S. economy achieves a soft landing as we expect, we may begin to increase the funds average duration to lock in prevailing yields for a longer period and position the fund for wider yield differences along the maturity spectrum.
October 16, 2006 |
1 | Total return includes reinvestment of dividends and any capital gains paid, based upon net asset | |
value per share. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Market price per share, net asset | ||
value per share and investment return fluctuate. Income may be subject to state and local taxes, | ||
and some income may be subject to the federal alternative minimum tax (AMT) for certain | ||
investors. Capital gains, if any, are fully taxable. Return figure provided reflects the absorption of | ||
certain fund expenses by The Dreyfus Corporation pursuant to an agreement in effect until | ||
May 31, 2007, at which time it may be extended, modified or terminated. Had these expenses | ||
not been absorbed, the funds return would have been lower. | ||
2 | Distribution rate per share is based upon dividends per share paid from net investment income | |
during the period, divided by the market price per share at the end of the period. |
The Fund 5
STATEMENT SELECTED INFORMATION OF INVESTMENTS September 30, 2006 (Unaudited) |
Market Price per share September 30, 2006 | $9.18 | |
Shares Outstanding September 30, 2006 | 60,588,631 | |
New York Stock Exchange Ticker Symbol | LEO |
MARKET PRICE (NEW YORK STOCK EXCHANGE)
Fiscal Year Ended September 30, 2006 | ||||||||
|
|
|
||||||
Quarter | Quarter | Quarter | Quarter | |||||
Ended | Ended | Ended | Ended | |||||
December 31, 2005 | March 31, 2006 | June 30, 2006 | September 30, 2005 | |||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
High | $8.87 | $8.90 | $8.90 | $9.25 | ||||
Low | 8.26 | 8.55 | 8.51 | 8.63 | ||||
Close | 8.55 | 8.89 | 8.60 | 9.18 |
PERCENTAGE GAIN (LOSS) based on change in Market Price*
September 23, 1987 (commencement of operations) | ||
through September 30, 2006 | 258.11% | |
October 1, 1996 through September 30, 2006 | 78.78 | |
October 1, 2001 through September 30, 2006 | 33.70 | |
October 1, 2005 through September 30, 2006 | 9.74 | |
January 1, 2006 through September 30, 2006 | 12.06 | |
April 1, 2006 through September 30, 2006 | 6.20 | |
July 1, 2006 through September 30, 2006 | 8.22 | |
NET ASSET VALUE PER SHARE | ||
September 23, 1987 (commencement of operations) | $ 9.32 | |
September 30, 2005 | 9.38 | |
December 31, 2005 | 9.31 | |
March 31, 2006 | 9.29 | |
June 30, 2006 | 9.21 | |
September 30, 2006 | 9.46 |
PERCENTAGE GAIN based on change in Net Asset Value*
September 23, 1987 (commencement of operations) | ||
through September 30, 2006 | 295.89% | |
October 1, 1996 through September 30, 2006 | 86.48 | |
October 1, 2001 through September 30, 2006 | 38.18 | |
October 1, 2005 through September 30, 2006 | 6.92 | |
January 1, 2006 through September 30, 2006 | 6.03 | |
April 1, 2006 through September 30, 2006 | 4.72 | |
July 1, 2006 through September 30, 2006 | 4.12 |
* With dividends reinvested. |
6 |
STATEMENT OF INVESTMENTS September 30, 2006 |
Long-Term Municipal | Coupon | Maturity | Principal | |||||
Investments154.8% | Rate (%) | Date | Amount ($) | Value ($) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Alabama5.3% | ||||||||
Houston County Health Care | ||||||||
Authority (Insured; AMBAC) | 6.25 | 10/1/09 | 8,000,000 a | 8,674,240 | ||||
Jefferson County, | ||||||||
Limited Obligation School Warrants | 5.25 | 1/1/18 | 16,000,000 | 17,190,400 | ||||
Jefferson County, | ||||||||
Limited Obligation School Warrants | 5.50 | 1/1/22 | 4,000,000 | 4,349,440 | ||||
Alaska.7% | ||||||||
Alaska Housing Finance Corp. | ||||||||
(Insured; MBIA) | 6.00 | 6/1/49 | 4,000,000 | 4,182,560 | ||||
Arizona4.1% | ||||||||
Coconino County Pollution Control | ||||||||
Corp., PCR (Nevada | ||||||||
Power Co. Project) | 6.38 | 10/1/36 | 3,500,000 | 3,570,455 | ||||
Maricopa County Pollution Control | ||||||||
Corp., PCR (Public Service Co. | ||||||||
of New Mexico Palo Verde Project) | 5.75 | 11/1/22 | 6,000,000 | 6,067,920 | ||||
Navajo County Industrial | ||||||||
Development Authority, IDR | ||||||||
(Stone Container Corp. Project) | 7.40 | 4/1/26 | 1,585,000 | 1,625,576 | ||||
Queen Creek Improvement District | ||||||||
Number 001, Special | ||||||||
Assessment Revenue | 5.00 | 1/1/32 | 2,000,000 b | 2,032,400 | ||||
Scottsdale Industrial Development | ||||||||
Authority, HR | ||||||||
(Scottsdale Healthcare) | 5.80 | 12/1/11 | 6,000,000 a | 6,656,340 | ||||
Tucson, | ||||||||
Water System Revenue | ||||||||
(Insured; FGIC) | 5.00 | 7/1/21 | 3,500,000 | 3,712,310 | ||||
Arkansas1.6% | ||||||||
Arkansas Development Finance | ||||||||
Authority, SFMR (Mortgage | ||||||||
Backed Securities Program) | ||||||||
(Collateralized: FNMA and GNMA) | 6.25 | 1/1/32 | 2,675,000 | 2,733,689 | ||||
Little Rock School District | ||||||||
(Insured; FSA) | 5.25 | 2/1/30 | 6,000,000 | 6,252,900 | ||||
California8.9% | ||||||||
California, | ||||||||
GO | 5.25 | 4/1/34 | 5,000,000 | 5,331,650 | ||||
California, | ||||||||
GO (Various Purpose) | 5.50 | 4/1/28 | 3,565,000 | 3,933,051 |
The Fund 7
STATEMENT OF INVESTMENTS (continued) |
Long-Term Municipal | Coupon | Maturity | Principal | |||||
Investments (continued) | Rate (%) | Date | Amount ($) | Value ($) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|
California (continued) |
California, | ||||||||
GO (Various Purpose) | 5.00 | 2/1/33 | 10,000,000 | 10,388,100 | ||||
California Pollution Control | ||||||||
Financing Authority, SWDR | ||||||||
(Keller Canyon Landfill Co. Project) | 6.88 | 11/1/27 | 2,000,000 | 2,013,520 | ||||
California Statewide Communities | ||||||||
Development Authority, Revenue | ||||||||
(Bentley School) | 6.75 | 7/1/32 | 2,000,000 | 2,178,600 | ||||
Golden State Tobacco | ||||||||
Securitization Corp., Tobacco | ||||||||
Settlement Asset-Backed Bonds | 5.00 | 6/1/21 | 1,620,000 | 1,634,791 | ||||
Golden State Tobacco | ||||||||
Securitization Corp., Tobacco | ||||||||
Settlement Asset-Backed Bonds | 7.80 | 6/1/42 | 8,100,000 | 9,888,885 | ||||
Golden State Tobacco | ||||||||
Securitization Corp., Tobacco | ||||||||
Settlement Asset-Backed Bonds | 7.90 | 6/1/42 | 2,000,000 | 2,453,320 | ||||
Los Angeles Unified School | ||||||||
District (Insured; FSA) | 5.25 | 7/1/20 | 7,200,000 | 7,859,016 | ||||
State Public Works Board of | ||||||||
California, LR Department of | ||||||||
General Services (Butterfield | ||||||||
State Office Complex) | 5.25 | 6/1/30 | 5,000,000 | 5,316,300 | ||||
Colorado6.1% | ||||||||
Beacon Point Metropolitan | ||||||||
District, GO | 6.25 | 12/1/35 | 2,000,000 | 2,134,180 | ||||
Colorado Housing Finance Authority | ||||||||
(Collateralized; FHA) | 6.60 | 8/1/32 | 2,100,000 | 2,172,702 | ||||
Denver City and County, | ||||||||
Special Facilities Airport | ||||||||
Revenue (United Airlines Project) | 6.88 | 10/1/32 | 7,135,000 c | 9,114,962 | ||||
Northwest Parkway Public Highway | ||||||||
Authority, Revenue | 7.13 | 6/15/41 | 10,750,000 | 10,723,663 | ||||
Salida Hospital District, | ||||||||
HR | 5.25 | 10/1/36 | 3,500,000 b | 3,481,660 | ||||
Silver Dollar Metropolitan | ||||||||
District, GO | 7.05 | 12/1/06 | 4,870,000 a | 4,898,295 | ||||
Southlands Metropolitan District | ||||||||
Number 1, GO | 7.13 | 12/1/34 | 2,000,000 | 2,214,880 | ||||
8 |
Long-Term Municipal | Coupon | Maturity | Principal | |||||
Investments (continued) | Rate (%) | Date | Amount ($) | Value ($) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|
Florida4.3% |
Deltona, | ||||||||
Utilities System Revenue | ||||||||
(Insured; MBIA) | 5.13 | 10/1/27 | 6,000,000 | 6,358,080 | ||||
Florida Housing Finance Corp., | ||||||||
Housing Revenue (Nelson Park | ||||||||
Apartments) (Insured; FSA) | 6.40 | 3/1/40 | 5,000 | 5,290 | ||||
Florida Housing Finance Corp., | ||||||||
Housing Revenue (Nelson Park | ||||||||
Apartments) (Insured; FSA) | 11.23 | 3/1/40 | 12,375,000 d,e | 13,091,636 | ||||
Highlands County Health Facilities | ||||||||
Authority, HR (Adventist | ||||||||
Health System/Sunbelt | ||||||||
Obligated Group) | 5.25 | 11/15/36 | 2,000,000 | 2,120,820 | ||||
Orange County Health Facilities | ||||||||
Authority, HR (Orlando | ||||||||
Regional Healthcare System) | 6.00 | 10/1/09 | 45,000 a | 48,421 | ||||
Orange County Health Facilities | ||||||||
Authority, HR (Orlando | ||||||||
Regional Healthcare System) | 6.00 | 10/1/26 | 1,955,000 | 2,075,193 | ||||
Palm Bay, | ||||||||
Educational Facilities Revenue | ||||||||
(Patriot Charter School Project) | 7.00 | 7/1/36 | 1,000,000 | 1,085,560 | ||||
Georgia2.2% | ||||||||
Augusta, | ||||||||
Water and Sewer Revenue | ||||||||
(Insured; FSA) | 5.25 | 10/1/39 | 3,000,000 | 3,219,660 | ||||
Brooks County Development | ||||||||
Authority, Senior Health and | ||||||||
Housing Facilities Revenue | ||||||||
(Presbyterian Home, Quitman, | ||||||||
Inc.) (Collateralized; GNMA) | 5.70 | 1/20/39 | 4,445,000 | 4,889,189 | ||||
Milledgeville-Baldwin County | ||||||||
Development Authority, Revenue | ||||||||
(Georgia College and State | ||||||||
Foundation) | 6.00 | 9/1/13 | 2,090,000 | 2,303,577 | ||||
Milledgeville-Baldwin County | ||||||||
Development Authority, Revenue | ||||||||
(Georgia College and State | ||||||||
Foundation) | 6.00 | 9/1/33 | 2,000,000 | 2,195,920 |
The Fund 9
STATEMENT OF INVESTMENTS (continued) |
Long-Term Municipal | Coupon | Maturity | Principal | |||||
Investments (continued) | Rate (%) | Date | Amount ($) | Value ($) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|
Hawaii.5% |
Hawaii Department of | ||||||||
Transportation, Special | ||||||||
Facilities Revenue (Caterair | ||||||||
International Corp. Project) | 10.13 | 12/1/10 | 2,600,000 | 2,602,236 | ||||
Idaho.6% | ||||||||
Power County Industrial | ||||||||
Development Corp., SWDR | ||||||||
(FMC Corp. Project) | 6.45 | 8/1/32 | 3,250,000 | 3,468,790 | ||||
Illinois13.4% | ||||||||
Cary, | ||||||||
Special Service Area Number | ||||||||
One, Special Tax Bonds | ||||||||
(Insured; Radian) | 5.00 | 3/1/30 | 1,950,000 | 2,011,288 | ||||
Chicago | ||||||||
(Insured; FGIC) | 6.13 | 7/1/10 | 14,565,000 a | 16,002,129 | ||||
Chicago, | ||||||||
SFMR (Collateralized: FHLMC, | ||||||||
FNMA and GNMA) | 6.55 | 4/1/33 | 3,440,000 | 3,490,465 | ||||
Chicago, | ||||||||
Wastewater Transmission | ||||||||
Revenue (Insured; MBIA) | 6.00 | 1/1/10 | 3,000,000 a | 3,247,290 | ||||
Chicago OHare International | ||||||||
Airport, Special Facilities | ||||||||
Revenue (American | ||||||||
Airlines Inc. Project) | 8.20 | 12/1/24 | 6,500,000 | 6,680,050 | ||||
Illinois Educational Facilities | ||||||||
Authority, Revenue | ||||||||
(Northwestern University) | 5.00 | 12/1/38 | 5,000,000 | 5,190,300 | ||||
Illinois Educational Facilities | ||||||||
Authority, Revenue (University | ||||||||
of Chicago) (Insured; MBIA) | 5.13 | 7/1/08 | 5,000 a | 5,183 | ||||
Illinois Educational Facilities | ||||||||
Authority, Revenue (University | ||||||||
of Chicago) (Insured; MBIA) | 5.13 | 7/1/38 | 6,995,000 | 7,202,751 | ||||
Illinois Health Facilities | ||||||||
Authority, Revenue (Advocate | ||||||||
Health Care Network) | 6.13 | 11/15/10 | 4,020,000 a | 4,405,116 | ||||
Illinois Health Facilities | ||||||||
Authority, Revenue (OSF | ||||||||
Healthcare System) | 6.25 | 11/15/09 | 7,730,000 a | 8,403,206 | ||||
10 |
Long-Term Municipal | Coupon | Maturity | Principal | |||||
Investments (continued) | Rate (%) | Date | Amount ($) | Value ($) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|
Illinois (continued) |
Illinois Health Facilities | ||||||||
Authority, Revenue (Swedish | ||||||||
American Hospital) | 6.88 | 5/15/10 | 4,970,000 a | 5,504,474 | ||||
Illinois Housing Development | ||||||||
Authority, Homeowner | ||||||||
Mortgage Revenue | 5.10 | 8/1/31 | 5,555,000 | 5,744,425 | ||||
Lombard Public Facilities Corp., | ||||||||
Conference Center and First | ||||||||
Tier Hotel Revenue | 7.13 | 1/1/36 | 3,500,000 | 3,757,565 | ||||
Metropolitan Pier and Exposition | ||||||||
Authority, Dedicated State Tax | ||||||||
Revenue (McCormick Place | ||||||||
Expansion) (Insured; MBIA) | 5.25 | 6/15/42 | 5,325,000 | 5,699,188 | ||||
Indiana2.2% | ||||||||
Franklin Township School Building | ||||||||
Corp., First Mortgage | 6.13 | 7/15/10 | 6,500,000 a | 7,205,835 | ||||
Indiana Housing Finance Authority, | ||||||||
SFMR | 5.95 | 1/1/29 | 720,000 | 732,463 | ||||
Petersburg, | ||||||||
SWDR (Indianapolis Power and | ||||||||
Light Company Project) | 6.38 | 11/1/29 | 4,150,000 | 4,509,929 | ||||
Kansas4.9% | ||||||||
Kansas Development Finance | ||||||||
Authority, Health Facilities | ||||||||
Revenue (Sisters of Charity of | ||||||||
Leavenworth Health Services Corp.) | 6.25 | 12/1/28 | 3,000,000 | 3,258,960 | ||||
Kansas Development Finance | ||||||||
Authority, Revenue (Board of | ||||||||
Regents-Scientific Resource) | ||||||||
(Insured; AMBAC) | 5.00 | 10/1/21 | 5,290,000 | 5,673,737 | ||||
Sedgwick and Shawnee Counties, | ||||||||
SFMR (Mortgage-Backed | ||||||||
Securities Program) | ||||||||
(Collateralized: FNMA and GNMA) | 6.30 | 12/1/32 | 5,275,000 | 5,383,348 | ||||
Sedgwick and Shawnee Counties, | ||||||||
SFMR (Mortgage-Backed | ||||||||
Securities Program) | ||||||||
(Collateralized: FNMA and GNMA) | 5.70 | 12/1/35 | 3,000,000 | 3,147,450 | ||||
Wichita, | ||||||||
HR (Christian Health System Inc.) | 6.25 | 11/15/24 | 10,000,000 | 10,641,400 |
The Fund 11
STATEMENT OF INVESTMENTS (continued) |
Long-Term Municipal | Coupon | Maturity | Principal | |||||
Investments (continued) | Rate (%) | Date | Amount ($) | Value ($) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|
Kentucky1.2% |
Kentucky Area Development | ||||||||
Districts Financing Trust, COP | ||||||||
(Lease Acquisition Program) | 5.50 | 5/1/27 | 2,000,000 | 2,125,940 | ||||
Kentucky Economic Development | ||||||||
Finance Authority, MFHR | ||||||||
(Christian Care Communities | ||||||||
Projects) (Collateralized; GNMA) | 5.25 | 11/20/25 | 2,370,000 | 2,563,605 | ||||
Kentucky Economic Development | ||||||||
Finance Authority, MFHR | ||||||||
(Christian Care Communities | ||||||||
Projects) (Collateralized; GNMA) | 5.38 | 11/20/35 | 1,805,000 | 1,957,559 | ||||
Louisiana.2% | ||||||||
Saint James Parish, | ||||||||
SWDR (Freeport-McMoRan | ||||||||
Partnership Project) | 7.70 | 10/1/22 | 1,405,000 | 1,407,529 | ||||
Maine.5% | ||||||||
Maine Housing Authority, | ||||||||
Mortgage Purchase | 5.30 | 11/15/23 | 2,825,000 | 2,947,153 | ||||
Maryland1.8% | ||||||||
Maryland Economic Development | ||||||||
Corp., Senior Student Housing | ||||||||
Revenue (University of | ||||||||
Maryland, Baltimore Project) | 5.75 | 10/1/33 | 4,500,000 | 4,506,390 | ||||
Maryland Economic Development | ||||||||
Corp., Student Housing Revenue | ||||||||
(University of Maryland, | ||||||||
College Park Project) | 6.50 | 6/1/13 | 3,000,000 a | 3,483,210 | ||||
Maryland Health and Higher | ||||||||
Educational Facilities | ||||||||
Authority, Revenue (Maryland | ||||||||
Institute College of Art Issue) | 5.00 | 6/1/30 | 2,500,000 | 2,580,175 | ||||
Massachusetts2.4% | ||||||||
Massachusetts Health and | ||||||||
Educational Facilities | ||||||||
Authority, Revenue (Civic | ||||||||
Investments Issue) | 9.00 | 12/15/15 | 1,900,000 | 2,326,930 | ||||
Massachusetts Health and | ||||||||
Educational Facilities | ||||||||
Authority, Revenue (Partners | ||||||||
Healthcare System) | 5.75 | 7/1/32 | 5,000,000 | 5,426,750 | ||||
12 |
Long-Term Municipal | Coupon | Maturity | Principal | |||||
Investments (continued) | Rate (%) | Date | Amount ($) | Value ($) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|
Massachusetts (continued) |
Massachusetts Industrial Finance | ||||||||
Agency, RRR (Ogden | ||||||||
Haverhill Project) | 5.60 | 12/1/19 | 6,000,000 | 6,197,880 | ||||
Michigan6.9% | ||||||||
Charyl Stockwell Academy, | ||||||||
COP | 5.90 | 10/1/35 | 2,580,000 | 2,650,305 | ||||
Detroit School District, | ||||||||
GO (School Building and Site | ||||||||
Improvement) (Insured; FGIC) | 5.00 | 5/1/28 | 5,000,000 | 5,203,150 | ||||
Kent Hospital Finance Authority, | ||||||||
Revenue (Metropolitan | ||||||||
Hospital Project) | 6.00 | 7/1/35 | 5,930,000 | 6,526,795 | ||||
Kent Hospital Finance Authority, | ||||||||
Revenue (Metropolitan | ||||||||
Hospital Project) | 6.25 | 7/1/40 | 3,000,000 | 3,342,900 | ||||
Michigan Hospital Finance | ||||||||
Authority, HR (Ascension | ||||||||
Health Credit) | 6.13 | 11/15/09 | 5,000,000 a | 5,417,100 | ||||
Michigan Strategic Fund, | ||||||||
LOR (Detroit Edison | ||||||||
Co. Exempt Facilities | ||||||||
Project) (Insured; XLCA) | 5.25 | 12/15/32 | 3,000,000 | 3,159,720 | ||||
Michigan Strategic Fund, | ||||||||
SWDR (Genesee Power | ||||||||
Station Project) | 7.50 | 1/1/21 | 14,000,000 | 13,998,740 | ||||
Minnesota4.5% | ||||||||
Dakota County Community | ||||||||
Development Agency, SFMR | ||||||||
(Mortgage-Backed Securities | ||||||||
Program) (Collateralized: | ||||||||
FHLMC, FNMA and GNMA) | 5.30 | 12/1/39 | 5,000,000 | 5,397,900 | ||||
Duluth Economic Development | ||||||||
Authority, Health Care | ||||||||
Facilities Revenue (Saint | ||||||||
Lukes Hospital) | 7.25 | 6/15/32 | 5,000,000 | 5,375,100 | ||||
Saint Paul Housing and | ||||||||
Redevelopement Authority, | ||||||||
Hospital Facility Revenue | ||||||||
(HealthEast Project) | 6.00 | 11/15/25 | 2,000,000 | 2,226,380 |
The Fund 13
STATEMENT OF INVESTMENTS (continued) |
Long-Term Municipal | Coupon | Maturity | Principal | |||||
Investments (continued) | Rate (%) | Date | Amount ($) | Value ($) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|
Minnesota (continued) |
Saint Paul Housing and | ||||||||
Redevelopment Authority, | ||||||||
Hospital Facility Revenue | ||||||||
(HealthEast Project) | 6.00 | 11/15/30 | 2,000,000 | 2,220,040 | ||||
Saint Paul Port Authority, | ||||||||
Hotel Facility Revenue | ||||||||
(Radisson Kellogg Project) | 7.38 | 8/1/08 | 3,000,000 a | 3,283,560 | ||||
United Hospital District of Todd, | ||||||||
Morrison, Cass and Wadena | ||||||||
Counties, GO Health Care | ||||||||
Facilities Revenue | ||||||||
(Lakewood Health System) | 5.13 | 12/1/24 | 1,500,000 | 1,562,895 | ||||
Winona, | ||||||||
Health Care Facilities Revenue | ||||||||
(Winona Health) | 6.00 | 7/1/26 | 5,000,000 | 5,484,350 | ||||
Mississippi3.3% | ||||||||
Clairborne County, | ||||||||
PCR (System Energy | ||||||||
Resources, Inc. Project) | 6.20 | 2/1/26 | 4,545,000 | 4,555,272 | ||||
Mississippi Business Finance | ||||||||
Corp., PCR (System Energy | ||||||||
Resources, Inc. Project) | 5.88 | 4/1/22 | 14,310,000 | 14,379,833 | ||||
Missouri2.9% | ||||||||
Missouri Development Finance | ||||||||
Board, Infrastructure | ||||||||
Facilities Revenue | ||||||||
(Branson Landing Project) | 5.38 | 12/1/27 | 2,000,000 | 2,082,880 | ||||
Missouri Development Finance | ||||||||
Board, Infrastructure | ||||||||
Facilities Revenue (Branson | ||||||||
Landing Project) | 5.50 | 12/1/32 | 4,500,000 | 4,704,120 | ||||
Missouri Development Finance | ||||||||
Board, Infrastructure | ||||||||
Facilities Revenue | ||||||||
(Independence, Crackerneck | ||||||||
Creek Project) | 5.00 | 3/1/28 | 2,000,000 | 2,075,260 | ||||
Missouri Health and Educational | ||||||||
Facilities Authority, Health | ||||||||
Facilities Revenue (Saint | ||||||||
Anthonys Medical Center) | 6.25 | 12/1/10 | 6,750,000 a | 7,488,045 | ||||
14 |
Long-Term Municipal | Coupon | Maturity | Principal | |||||
Investments (continued) | Rate (%) | Date | Amount ($) | Value ($) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|
Montana.3% |
Montana Board of Housing, | ||||||||
SFMR | 6.45 | 6/1/29 | 1,490,000 | 1,524,032 | ||||
Nevada2.8% | ||||||||
Clark County, | ||||||||
IDR (Nevada Power Co. Project) | 5.60 | 10/1/30 | 3,000,000 | 3,011,250 | ||||
Washoe County | ||||||||
(Reno-Sparks Convention | ||||||||
Center) (Insured; FSA) | 6.40 | 1/1/10 | 12,000,000 a | 13,045,440 | ||||
New Hampshire2.6% | ||||||||
New Hampshire Business Finance | ||||||||
Authority, PCR (Public Service | ||||||||
Co. of New Hampshire) | ||||||||
(Insured; AMBAC) | 6.00 | 5/1/21 | 7,000,000 | 7,370,790 | ||||
New Hampshire Health and | ||||||||
Educational Facilities Authority, | ||||||||
Revenue (Exeter Project) | 6.00 | 10/1/24 | 1,000,000 | 1,106,500 | ||||
New Hampshire Health and | ||||||||
Educational Facilities Authority, | ||||||||
Revenue (Exeter Project) | 5.75 | 10/1/31 | 1,000,000 | 1,067,410 | ||||
New Hampshire Industrial | ||||||||
Development Authority, PCR | ||||||||
(Connecticut Light and Power | ||||||||
Company Project) | 5.90 | 11/1/16 | 5,000,000 | 5,142,000 | ||||
New Jersey5.2% | ||||||||
New Jersey Economic Development | ||||||||
Authority, Cigarette | ||||||||
Tax Revenue | 5.75 | 6/15/34 | 2,500,000 | 2,672,300 | ||||
New Jersey Economic Development | ||||||||
Authority, Special Facility | ||||||||
Revenue (Continental | ||||||||
Airlines, Inc. Project) | 6.25 | 9/15/29 | 3,000,000 | 3,089,490 | ||||
New Jersey Transportation | ||||||||
Trust Fund Authority | ||||||||
(Transportation System) | 5.25 | 12/15/22 | 5,000,000 | 5,653,500 | ||||
New Jersey Turnpike Authority, | ||||||||
Turnpike Revenue (Insured; AMBAC) | 5.00 | 1/1/35 | 4,500,000 | 4,639,995 | ||||
Tobacco Settlement Financing Corp. | ||||||||
of New Jersey, Tobacco | ||||||||
Settlement Asset-Backed Bonds | 6.38 | 6/1/32 | 4,000,000 | 4,390,400 |
The Fund 15
STATEMENT OF INVESTMENTS (continued) |
Long-Term Municipal | Coupon | Maturity | Principal | |||||
Investments (continued) | Rate (%) | Date | Amount ($) | Value ($) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|
New Jersey (continued) |
Tobacco Settlement Financing Corp. | ||||||||
of New Jersey, Tobacco | ||||||||
Settlement Asset-Backed Bonds | 7.00 | 6/1/41 | 8,320,000 | 9,555,770 | ||||
New Mexico1.4% | ||||||||
Farmington, | ||||||||
PCR (Tucson Electric Power Co. | ||||||||
San Juan Project) | 6.95 | 10/1/20 | 4,000,000 | 4,156,280 | ||||
New Mexico Mortgage Finance | ||||||||
Authority (Single Family | ||||||||
Mortgage Program) | ||||||||
(Collateralized: FHLMC, | ||||||||
FNMA and GNMA) | 7.00 | 9/1/31 | 1,745,000 | 1,773,182 | ||||
New Mexico Mortgage Finance | ||||||||
Authority (Single Family | ||||||||
Mortgage Program) | ||||||||
(Collateralized: FHLMC, | ||||||||
FNMA and GNMA) | 6.15 | 7/1/35 | 2,000,000 | 2,156,260 | ||||
New York8.5% | ||||||||
Long Island Power Authority, | ||||||||
Electric System Revenue | 6.29 | 12/1/16 | 20,000,000 d,e | 20,726,000 | ||||
New York City | 5.00 | 8/1/28 | 10,000,000 | 10,568,500 | ||||
New York City Industrial | ||||||||
Development Agency, Liberty | ||||||||
Revenue (7 World Trade | ||||||||
Center Project) | 6.25 | 3/1/15 | 3,000,000 | 3,192,360 | ||||
New York City Industrial | ||||||||
Development Agency, Special | ||||||||
Facility Revenue (American | ||||||||
Airlines, Inc. John F. Kennedy | ||||||||
International Airport Project) | 8.00 | 8/1/28 | 2,800,000 | 3,357,956 | ||||
Tobacco Settlement Financing Corp. | ||||||||
of New York, Asset-Backed | ||||||||
Revenue Bonds (State Contingency | ||||||||
Contract Secured) (Insured; AMBAC) | 5.25 | 6/1/21 | 5,000,000 | 5,379,250 | ||||
Triborough Bridge and Tunnel | ||||||||
Authority, Revenue | 5.25 | 11/15/30 | 5,220,000 | 5,549,382 | ||||
North Carolina.6% | ||||||||
Gaston County Industrial | ||||||||
Facilities and Pollution | ||||||||
Control Financing Authority, | ||||||||
Exempt Facilities Revenue | ||||||||
(National Gypsum Co. Project) | 5.75 | 8/1/35 | 3,000,000 | 3,178,620 | ||||
16 |
Long-Term Municipal | Coupon | Maturity | Principal | |||||
Investments (continued) | Rate (%) | Date | Amount ($) | Value ($) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|
North Dakota.2% |
North Dakota Housing Finance | ||||||||
Agency, Home Mortgage Revenue | ||||||||
(Housing Finance Program) | 6.15 | 7/1/31 | 955,000 | 974,959 | ||||
Ohio7.1% | ||||||||
Canal Winchester Local School | ||||||||
District (Insured; MBIA) | 0.00 | 12/1/29 | 3,955,000 | 1,407,070 | ||||
Canal Winchester Local School | ||||||||
District (Insured; MBIA) | 0.00 | 12/1/31 | 3,955,000 | 1,277,544 | ||||
Cincinnati, | ||||||||
Water Systems Revenue | 5.00 | 12/1/21 | 3,800,000 | 3,971,798 | ||||
Cincinnati City School District, | ||||||||
Classroom Facilities | ||||||||
Construction and Improvement | ||||||||
(Insured; FSA) | 5.00 | 12/1/13 | 5,000,000 a | 5,418,400 | ||||
Cleveland State University, | ||||||||
General Receipts (Insured; FGIC) | 5.00 | 6/1/34 | 5,000,000 | 5,248,050 | ||||
Cuyahoga County, | ||||||||
Revenue | 6.00 | 1/1/32 | 750,000 | 834,225 | ||||
Ohio Air Quality Development | ||||||||
Authority, PCR (Cleveland | ||||||||
Electric Illuminating Co. | ||||||||
Project) (Insured; ACA) | 6.10 | 8/1/20 | 3,000,000 | 3,098,370 | ||||
Ohio Water Development Authority, | ||||||||
Pollution Control Facilities | ||||||||
Revenue (Cleveland Electric | ||||||||
Illuminating Co. Project) | ||||||||
(Insured; ACA) | 6.10 | 8/1/20 | 4,350,000 | 4,492,636 | ||||
Toledo Lucas County Port | ||||||||
Authority, Airport Revenue | ||||||||
(Baxter Global Project) | 6.25 | 11/1/13 | 4,100,000 | 4,316,316 | ||||
Trotwood-Madison City School | ||||||||
District, School Improvement | ||||||||
(Insured; FGIC) | 5.00 | 12/1/30 | 10,495,000 | 10,955,416 | ||||
Oklahoma2.7% | ||||||||
Oklahoma Housing Finance Agency, | ||||||||
SFMR (Homeownership | ||||||||
Loan Program) | 7.55 | 9/1/28 | 1,190,000 | 1,211,670 | ||||
Oklahoma Housing Finance Agency, | ||||||||
SFMR (Homeownership Loan | ||||||||
Program) (Collateralized: | ||||||||
FNMA and GNMA) | 7.55 | 9/1/27 | 1,180,000 | 1,216,946 |
The Fund 17
STATEMENT OF INVESTMENTS (continued) |
Long-Term Municipal | Coupon | Maturity | Principal | |||||
Investments (continued) | Rate (%) | Date | Amount ($) | Value ($) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|
Oklahoma (continued) |
Oklahoma Industries Authority, | ||||||||
Health System Revenue | ||||||||
(Obligated Group) (Insured; MBIA) | 5.75 | 8/15/09 | 5,160,000 a | 5,506,288 | ||||
Oklahoma Industries Authority, | ||||||||
Health System Revenue | ||||||||
(Obligated Group) (Insured; MBIA) | 5.75 | 8/15/29 | 7,070,000 | 7,479,777 | ||||
Oregon2.4% | ||||||||
Port of Portland, | ||||||||
International Airport Revenue | ||||||||
(Portland International | ||||||||
Airport) (Insured; AMBAC) | 5.50 | 7/1/24 | 5,000,000 | 5,247,700 | ||||
Western Generation Agency, | ||||||||
Cogeneration Project Revenue | ||||||||
(Wauna Cogeneration Project) | 7.40 | 1/1/16 | 5,750,000 | 5,771,965 | ||||
Western Generation Agency, | ||||||||
Cogeneration Project Revenue | ||||||||
(Wauna Cogeneration Project) | 7.13 | 1/1/21 | 2,900,000 | 2,910,440 | ||||
Pennsylvania2.9% | ||||||||
Abington School District | ||||||||
(Insured; FSA) | 5.13 | 10/1/34 | 4,085,000 | 4,333,368 | ||||
Lehman Municipal Trust | ||||||||
Receipts (Pennsylvania | ||||||||
Economic Development | ||||||||
Financing Authority) | 7.88 | 6/1/31 | 9,310,000 d,e | 9,717,545 | ||||
Pennsylvania Economic Development | ||||||||
Financing Authority, Exempt | ||||||||
Facilities Revenue (Reliant | ||||||||
Energy Seward, LLC Project) | 6.75 | 12/1/36 | 2,500,000 | 2,686,550 | ||||
South Carolina4.8% | ||||||||
Greenville County School District, | ||||||||
Installment Purchase Revenue | ||||||||
(Building Equity Sooner | ||||||||
for Tomorrow) | 5.50 | 12/1/12 | 5,000 a | 5,542 | ||||
Greenville County School District, | ||||||||
Installment Purchase Revenue | ||||||||
(Building Equity Sooner | ||||||||
for Tomorrow) | 6.99 | 12/1/28 | 20,020,000 d,e | 22,191,770 | ||||
Greenville Hospital System, | ||||||||
Hospital Facilities Revenue | ||||||||
(Insured; AMBAC) | 5.50 | 5/1/26 | 5,000,000 | 5,377,050 | ||||
18 |
Long-Term Municipal | Coupon | Maturity | Principal | |||||
Investments (continued) | Rate (%) | Date | Amount ($) | Value ($) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|
Tennessee3.4% |
Johnson City Health and | ||||||||
Educational Facilities Board, | ||||||||
Hospital First Mortgage | ||||||||
Revenue (Mountain States | ||||||||
Health Alliance) | 7.50 | 7/1/25 | 5,000,000 | 5,891,200 | ||||
Johnson City Health and | ||||||||
Educational Facilities Board, | ||||||||
Hospital First Mortgage | ||||||||
Revenue (Mountain States | ||||||||
Health Alliance) | 7.50 | 7/1/33 | 3,000,000 | 3,515,400 | ||||
Memphis Center Revenue Finance | ||||||||
Corp., Sports Facility Revenue | ||||||||
(Memphis Redbirds) | 6.50 | 9/1/28 | 10,000,000 | 9,939,300 | ||||
Texas12.8% | ||||||||
Alliance Airport Authority Inc., | ||||||||
Special Facilities Revenue | ||||||||
(American Airlines, Inc. Project) | 7.50 | 12/1/29 | 7,500,000 | 7,608,750 | ||||
Austin Convention Enterprises | ||||||||
Inc., Convention Center Hotel | ||||||||
First Tier Revenue | 6.70 | 1/1/28 | 4,000,000 | 4,269,040 | ||||
Brazos River Authority, | ||||||||
PCR (TXU Energy Co. LLC Project) | 6.75 | 10/1/38 | 1,650,000 | 1,863,097 | ||||
Dallas-Fort Worth International | ||||||||
Airport Facility Improvement | ||||||||
Corp., Revenue (American | ||||||||
Airlines Inc.) | 6.38 | 5/1/35 | 10,630,000 | 10,590,350 | ||||
Harris County Health Facilities | ||||||||
Development Corp., HR | ||||||||
(Memorial Hermann | ||||||||
Healthcare System) | 6.38 | 6/1/11 | 8,500,000 a | 9,565,730 | ||||
Houston, | ||||||||
Airport System Special | ||||||||
Facilities Revenue | ||||||||
(Continental Airlines, Inc. | ||||||||
Terminal E Project) | 6.75 | 7/1/29 | 5,125,000 | 5,460,995 | ||||
Houston, | ||||||||
Airport System Special | ||||||||
Facilities Revenue | ||||||||
(Continental Airlines, Inc. | ||||||||
Terminal E Project) | 7.00 | 7/1/29 | 3,800,000 | 4,083,556 |
The Fund 19
STATEMENT OF INVESTMENTS (continued) |
Long-Term Municipal | Coupon | Maturity | Principal | |||||
Investments (continued) | Rate (%) | Date | Amount ($) | Value ($) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|
Texas (continued) |
Sabine River Authority, | ||||||||
PCR (TXU Electric Co. Project) | 6.45 | 6/1/21 | 11,300,000 | 12,075,519 | ||||
Sam Rayburn Municipal Power | ||||||||
Agency, Power Supply | ||||||||
System Revenue | 5.75 | 10/1/21 | 6,000,000 | 6,553,980 | ||||
Texas Department of Housing and | ||||||||
Community Affairs, Home | ||||||||
Mortgage Revenue | ||||||||
(Collateralized: FHLMC, | ||||||||
FNMA and GNMA) | 9.98 | 7/2/24 | 1,150,000 d | 1,218,574 | ||||
Texas Turnpike Authority, | ||||||||
Central Texas Turnpike System | ||||||||
Revenue (Insured; AMBAC) | 5.75 | 8/15/38 | 7,100,000 | 7,799,279 | ||||
Tyler Health Facilities | ||||||||
Development Corp., HR (East | ||||||||
Texas Medical Center Regional | ||||||||
Healthcare System Project) | 6.75 | 11/1/25 | 3,000,000 | 3,030,900 | ||||
Vermont.2% | ||||||||
Vermont Housing Finance Agency, | ||||||||
Single Family Housing | ||||||||
(Insured; FSA) | 6.40 | 11/1/30 | 1,165,000 | 1,180,529 | ||||
Virginia2.2% | ||||||||
Greater Richmond | ||||||||
Convention Center | ||||||||
Authority, Hotel Tax Revenue | ||||||||
(Convention Center | ||||||||
Expansion Project) | 6.25 | 6/15/10 | 10,500,000 a | 11,575,620 | ||||
Industrial Development Authority | ||||||||
of Pittsylvania County, | ||||||||
Exempt Facility Revenue | ||||||||
(Multitrade of Pittsylvania | ||||||||
County, L.P. Project) | 7.65 | 1/1/10 | 800,000 | 844,952 | ||||
Washington2.8% | ||||||||
Energy Northwest, | ||||||||
Wind Project Revenue | 5.88 | 1/1/07 | 3,000,000 a | 3,106,560 | ||||
Seattle, | ||||||||
Water System Revenue | ||||||||
(Insured; FGIC) | 6.00 | 7/1/09 | 10,000,000 a | 10,732,000 |
20 |
Long-Term Municipal | Coupon | Maturity | Principal | |||||
Investments (continued) | Rate (%) | Date | Amount ($) | Value ($) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|
Washington (continued) |
Washington Health Care Facilities | ||||||||
Authority, Revenue (Kadlec | ||||||||
Medical Center) (Insured; | ||||||||
Assured Guaranty) | 5.00 | 12/1/30 | 2,000,000 | 2,093,260 | ||||
West Virginia3.0% | ||||||||
Braxton County, | ||||||||
SWDR (Weyerhaeuser Co. Project) | 6.13 | 4/1/26 | 14,000,000 | 14,511,000 | ||||
West Virginia Water Development | ||||||||
Authority, Water Development | ||||||||
Revenue (Insured; AMBAC) | 6.38 | 7/1/39 | 2,250,000 | 2,460,848 | ||||
Wisconsin8.1% | ||||||||
Badger Tobacco Asset | ||||||||
Securitization Corp., Tobacco | ||||||||
Settlement Asset-Backed Bonds | 7.72 | 6/1/27 | 12,580,000 d,e | 13,491,673 | ||||
Badger Tobacco Asset | ||||||||
Securitization Corp., Tobacco | ||||||||
Settlement Asset-Backed Bonds | 7.00 | 6/1/28 | 22,995,000 | 25,781,764 | ||||
Madison, | ||||||||
IDR (Madison Gas and | ||||||||
Electric Co. Projects) | 5.88 | 10/1/34 | 2,390,000 | 2,570,493 | ||||
Wisconsin Health and Educational | ||||||||
Facilities Authority, Revenue | ||||||||
(Aurora Health Care) | 6.40 | 4/15/33 | 4,000,000 | 4,458,240 | ||||
Wyoming.8% | ||||||||
Sweetwater County, | ||||||||
SWDR (FMC Corp. Project) | 5.60 | 12/1/35 | 4,500,000 | 4,751,595 | ||||
U.S. Related1.5% | ||||||||
Childrens Trust Fund of Puerto | ||||||||
Rico, Tobacco Settlement | ||||||||
Asset-Backed Bonds | 0.00 | 5/15/55 | 20,000,000 | 691,600 | ||||
Guam Housing Corp., | ||||||||
SFMR (Collateralized; FHLMC) | 5.75 | 9/1/31 | 965,000 | 1,115,772 | ||||
Puerto Rico Highway and | ||||||||
Transportation Authority, | ||||||||
Transportation Revenue | 6.00 | 7/1/10 | 6,000,000 a | 6,557,040 | ||||
Total Long-Term Municipal Investments | ||||||||
(cost $832,074,074) | 888,150,873 |
The Fund 21
STATEMENT OF INVESTMENTS (continued) |
Short-Term Municipal | Coupon | Maturity | Principal | |||||
Investment.6% | Rate (%) | Date | Amount ($) | Value ($) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|
Alaska; |
Valdez, | ||||||||
Marine Terminal Revenue | ||||||||
(BP Pipelines Project) | ||||||||
(cost $3,200,000) | 3.85 | 10/1/06 | 3,200,000 f | 3,200,000 | ||||
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Total Investments (cost $835,274,074) | 155.4% | 891,350,873 | ||||||
Liabilities, Less Cash And Receivables | (5.7%) | (32,959,835) | ||||||
Preferred Stock, at redemption value | (49.7%) | (285,000,000) | ||||||
Net Assets Applicable to | ||||||||
Common Shareholders | 100.0% | 573,391,038 |
a These securities are prerefunded; the date shown represents the prerefunded date. Bonds which are prerefunded are |
collateralized by U.S. Government securities which are held in escrow and are used to pay principal and interest on |
the municipal issue and to retire the bonds in full at the earliest refunding date. |
b Purchased on a delayed delivery basis. |
c Non-income producing security; interest payments in default. |
d Collateral for floating rate borrowings. |
e Securities exempt from registration under Rule 144A of the Securities Act of 1933.These securities may be resold in |
transactions exempt from registration, normally to qualified institutional buyers. At September 30, 2006, these |
securities amounted to $79,218,624 or 13.8% of net assets applicable to Common Shareholders. |
f Securities payable on demand.Variable interest ratesubject to periodic change. |
22 |
Summary of Abbreviations | ||||||
ACA | American Capital Access | AGC | ACE Guaranty Corporation | |||
AGIC | Asset Guaranty Insurance | AMBAC | American Municipal Bond | |||
Company | Assurance Corporation | |||||
ARRN | Adjustable Rate Receipt Notes | BAN | Bond Anticipation Notes | |||
BIGI | Bond Investors Guaranty Insurance | BPA | Bond Purchase Agreement | |||
CGIC | Capital Guaranty Insurance | CIC | Continental Insurance | |||
Company | Company | |||||
CIFG | CDC Ixis Financial Guaranty | CMAC | Capital Market Assurance | |||
Corporation | ||||||
COP | Certificate of Participation | CP | Commercial Paper | |||
EDR | Economic Development Revenue | EIR | Environmental Improvement | |||
Revenue | ||||||
FGIC | Financial Guaranty Insurance | |||||
Company | FHA | Federal Housing Administration | ||||
FHLB | Federal Home Loan Bank | FHLMC | Federal Home Loan Mortgage | |||
Corporation | ||||||
FNMA | Federal National | |||||
Mortgage Association | FSA | Financial Security Assurance | ||||
GAN | Grant Anticipation Notes | GIC | Guaranteed Investment Contract | |||
GNMA | Government National | |||||
Mortgage Association | GO | General Obligation | ||||
HR | Hospital Revenue | IDB | Industrial Development Board | |||
IDC | Industrial Development Corporation | IDR | Industrial Development Revenue | |||
LOC | Letter of Credit | LOR | Limited Obligation Revenue | |||
LR | Lease Revenue | MBIA | Municipal Bond Investors Assurance | |||
Insurance Corporation | ||||||
MFHR | Multi-Family Housing Revenue | MFMR | Multi-Family Mortgage Revenue | |||
PCR | Pollution Control Revenue | PILOT | Payment in Lieu of Taxes | |||
RAC | Revenue Anticipation Certificates | RAN | Revenue Anticipation Notes | |||
RAW | Revenue Anticipation Warrants | RRR | Resources Recovery Revenue | |||
SAAN | State Aid Anticipation Notes | SBPA | Standby Bond Purchase Agreement | |||
SFHR | Single Family Housing Revenue | SFMR | Single Family Mortgage Revenue | |||
SONYMA | State of New York Mortgage Agency | SWDR | Solid Waste Disposal Revenue | |||
TAN | Tax Anticipation Notes | TAW | Tax Anticipation Warrants | |||
TRAN | Tax and Revenue Anticipation Notes | XLCA | XL Capital Assurance |
The Fund 23
STATEMENT OF INVESTMENTS (continued) |
Summary of Combined Ratings (Unaudited) | ||||||||||
Fitch | or Moodys | or | Standard & Poors | Value (%) | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
AAA | Aaa | AAA | 31.7 | |||||||
AA | Aa | AA | 9.6 | |||||||
A | A | A | 14.7 | |||||||
BBB | Baa | BBB | 23.8 | |||||||
BB | Ba | BB | 1.3 | |||||||
B | B | B | 4.3 | |||||||
CCC | Caa | CCC | 2.9 | |||||||
F1 | MIG1/P1 | SP1/A1 | .4 | |||||||
Not Rated g | Not Rated g | Not Rated g | 11.3 | |||||||
100.0 | ||||||||||
| Based on total investments. | |||||||||
g | Securities which, while not rated by Fitch, Moodys and Standard & Poors, have been determined by the Manager to | |||||||||
be of comparable quality to those rated securities in which the fund may invest. | ||||||||||
See notes to financial statements. |
24 |
STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL FUTURES
September 30, 2006
Market Value | Unrealized | |||||||
Covered by | Depreciation | |||||||
Contracts | Contracts ($) | Expiration | at 9/30/2006 ($) | |||||
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Financial Futures Sold Short | ||||||||
U.S. Treasury 10 Year Note | 384 | (41,496,000) | December 2006 | (412,152) |
The Fund 25
STATEMENT OF ASSETS AND LIABILITIES
September 30, 2006
Cost | Value | |||
|
|
|
||
Assets ($): | ||||
Investments in securitiesSee Statement of Investments | 835,274,074 | 891,350,873 | ||
Cash | 159,261 | |||
Cash on initial margin | 230,400 | |||
Interest receivable | 15,276,467 | |||
Receivable for futures variation marginNote 4 | 36,000 | |||
Prepaid expenses | 22,240 | |||
907,075,241 | ||||
|
|
|
||
Liabilities ($): | ||||
Due to The Dreyfus Corporation and affiliatesNote 3(b) | 509,648 | |||
Payable for floating rate notes issued | 39,205,000 | |||
Payable for investment securities purchased | 5,529,320 | |||
Dividends payable to Common Shareholders | 2,544,722 | |||
Interest and related expenses payable | 540,606 | |||
Dividends payable to Preferred Shareholders | 109,431 | |||
Commissions payable | 17,500 | |||
Administrative service fees | 7,947 | |||
Accrued expenses | 220,029 | |||
48,684,203 | ||||
|
|
|
||
Auction Preferred Stock, Series M,T,W,Th and F | ||||
par value $.001 per share (11,400 shares issued and | ||||
outstanding at $25,000 per share liquidation preference)Note 1 | 285,000,000 | |||
|
|
|||
Net Assets applicable to Common Shareholders ($) | 573,391,038 | |||
|
|
|
||
Composition of Net Assets ($): | ||||
Common Stock, par value, $.001 per share | ||||
(60,588,631 shares issued and outstanding) | 60,589 | |||
Paid-in capital | 571,211,179 | |||
Accumulated distributions in excess of investment incomenet | (193,590) | |||
Accumulated net realized gain (loss) on investments | (53,351,787) | |||
Accumulated net unrealized appreciation(depreciation) | ||||
on investments [including ($412,152) net unrealized | ||||
(depreciation) on financial futures] | 55,664,647 | |||
|
|
|
||
Net assets applicable to Common Shareholders ($) | 573,391,038 | |||
|
|
|
||
Shares Outstanding | ||||
(500 million shares authorized) | 60,588,631 | |||
Net Asset Value, per share of Common Stock ($) | 9.46 |
See notes to financial statements. |
26 |
STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS Year ended September 30, 2006 |
Investment Income ($): | ||
Interest Income | 48,160,161 | |
Expenses: | ||
Management feeNote 3(a) | 6,359,839 | |
Interest and related expenses | 1,032,918 | |
Commission feesNote 1 | 754,334 | |
Custodian feesNote 3(b) | 145,007 | |
Shareholder servicing costs | 123,674 | |
Professional fees | 79,693 | |
Shareholders reports | 77,382 | |
Directors fees and expensesNote 3(c) | 57,999 | |
Registration fees | 53,753 | |
Interest expenseNote 2 | 628 | |
Miscellaneous | 67,644 | |
Total Expenses | 8,752,871 | |
Lessreduction in management fee | ||
due to undertakingNote 3(a) | (847,978) | |
Lessreduction in custody fees | ||
due to earnings creditsNote 1 | (1,488) | |
Net Expenses | 7,903,405 | |
Investment IncomeNet | 40,256,756 | |
|
|
|
Realized and Unrealized Gain (Loss) on InvestmentsNote 4 ($): | ||
Net realized gain (loss) on investments | 2,341,497 | |
Net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) | ||
on investments [including ($412,152) | ||
net unrealized (depreciation) on financial futures] | 2,965,687 | |
Net Realized and Unrealized Gain (Loss) on Investments | 5,307,184 | |
Dividends on Preferred Stock | (8,930,919) | |
Net Increase in Net Assets Resulting from Operations | 36,633,021 |
See notes to financial statements. |
The Fund 27
STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN NET ASSETS
Year Ended September 30, | ||||
|
||||
2006 | 2005 | |||
|
|
|
||
Operations ($): | ||||
Investment incomenet | 40,256,756 | 39,711,581 | ||
Net realized gain (loss) on investments | 2,341,497 | 4,278,800 | ||
Net unrealized appreciation | ||||
(depreciation) on investments | 2,965,687 | 8,461,372 | ||
Dividends on Preferred Stock | (8,930,919) | (5,765,999) | ||
Net Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets | ||||
Resulting from Operations | 36,633,021 | 46,685,754 | ||
|
|
|
||
Dividends to Common Shareholders from ($): | ||||
Investment incomenet | (31,506,090) | (34,656,704) | ||
Total Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets | 5,126,931 | 12,029,050 | ||
|
|
|
||
Net Assets ($): | ||||
Beginning of Period | 568,264,107 | 556,235,057 | ||
End of Period | 573,391,038 | 568,264,107 | ||
Undistributed (distributions in excess of) | ||||
investment incomenet | (193,590) | 75,988 |
See notes to financial statements. |
28 |
FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS |
The following table describes the performance for the fiscal periods indicated.Total return shows how much your investment in the fund would have increased (or decreased) during each period, assuming you had reinvested all dividends and dis-tributions.These figures have been derived from the funds financial statements, and with respect to common stock, market price data for the funds common shares.
Year Ended September 30, | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
2006 | 2005 | 2004 | 2003 | 2002 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Per Share Data ($): | ||||||||||||||
Net asset value, beginning of period | 9.38 | 9.18 | 9.14 | 9.37 | 9.66 | |||||||||
Investment Operations: | ||||||||||||||
Investment incomenet a | .66 | .66 | .63 | .71 | .81 | |||||||||
Net realized and unrealized | ||||||||||||||
gain (loss) on investments | .09 | .21 | .12 | (.15) | (.35) | |||||||||
Dividends on Preferred Stock | ||||||||||||||
from investment incomenet | (.15) | (.10) | (.06) | (.07) | (.08) | |||||||||
Total from Investment Operations | .60 | .77 | .69 | .49 | .38 | |||||||||
Distributions to Common Shareholders: | ||||||||||||||
Dividends from investment incomenet | (.52) | (.57) | (.65) | (.72) | (.67) | |||||||||
Net asset value, end of period | 9.46 | 9.38 | 9.18 | 9.14 | 9.37 | |||||||||
Market value, end of period | 9.18 | 8.87 | 8.86 | 9.38 | 10.11 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
Total Return (%) b | 9.74 | 6.87 | 1.55 | .33 | 11.89 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
Ratios/Supplemental Data (%): | ||||||||||||||
Ratio of total expenses to average | ||||||||||||||
net assets applicable to Common Stock c,d | 1.55 | 1.47 | 1.43 | 1.48 | 1.48 | |||||||||
Ratio of net expenses to average | ||||||||||||||
net assets applicable to Common Stock c,d | 1.40 | 1.33 | 1.43 | 1.48 | 1.48 | |||||||||
Ratio of net investment income to average | ||||||||||||||
net assets applicable to Common Stock c | 7.15 | 7.03 | 6.97 | 7.86 | 8.61 | |||||||||
Ratio of total expenses to | ||||||||||||||
total average net assets d | 1.03 | .98 | .94 | .97 | .98 | |||||||||
Ratio of net expenses to | ||||||||||||||
total average net assets d | .93 | .89 | .94 | .97 | .98 | |||||||||
Ratio of net investment income | ||||||||||||||
to total average net assets | 4.75 | 4.67 | 4.59 | 5.15 | 5.69 | |||||||||
Portfolio Turnover Rate | 31.44 | 27.96 | 27.31 | 54.79 | 36.81 | |||||||||
Asset coverage of Preferred Stock, | ||||||||||||||
end of period | 301 | 299 | 295 | 293 | 294 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
Net Assets, net of Preferred Stock, | ||||||||||||||
end of period ($ x 1,000) | 573,391 | 568,264 | 556,235 | 549,676 | 554,757 | |||||||||
Preferred Stock outstanding, | ||||||||||||||
end of period ($ x 1,000) | 285,000 | 285,000 | 285,000 | 285,000 | 285,000 | |||||||||
a | Based on average shares outstanding at each month end. | |||||||||||||
b | Calculated based on market value. | |||||||||||||
c | Does not reflect the effect of dividends to Preferred Stockholders. | |||||||||||||
d | Ratio of total expenses to average net assets and ratio of net expenses to average net assets for all periods have been | |||||||||||||
restated.This restatement has no impact on the funds previously reported net assets, net investment income, net asset | ||||||||||||||
value or total return. See Note 5. | ||||||||||||||
See notes to financial statements. | The Fund | 29 |
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTE 1 Significant Accounting Policies:
Dreyfus Strategic Municipals, Inc. (the fund) is registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the Act), as a diversified closed-end management investment company.The funds investment objective is to maximize current income exempt from federal income tax to the extent consistent with the preservation of capital. The Dreyfus Corporation (the Manager or Dreyfus) serves as the funds investment adviser.The Manager is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Mellon Financial Corporation (Mellon Financial). The funds Common Stock trades on the New York Stock Exchange under the ticker symbol LEO.
The fund has outstanding 2,280 shares of Series M, Series T, Series W, Series TH and Series F for a total of 11,400 shares of Auction Preferred Stock (APS), with a liquidation preference of $25,000 per share (plus an amount equal to accumulated but unpaid dividends upon liquidation). APS dividend rates are determined pursuant to periodic auctions. Deutsche Bank Trust Company America, as Auction Agent, receives a fee from the fund for its services in connection with such auctions. The fund also compensates broker-dealers generally at an annual rate of .25% of the purchase price of the shares of APS placed by the broker-dealer in an auction.
The fund is subject to certain restrictions relating to the APS. Failure to comply with these restrictions could preclude the fund from declaring any distributions to common shareholders or repurchasing common shares and/or could trigger the mandatory redemption of APS at liquidation value.
The holders of the APS, voting as a separate class, have the right to elect at least two directors.The holders of the APS will vote as a separate class on certain other matters, as required by law. The fund has designated Robin A. Melvin and John E. Zuccotti to represent holders of APS on the funds Board of Directors.
The funds financial statements are prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, which may require the use
30 |
of management estimates and assumptions. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
The fund enters into contracts that contain a variety of indemnifications. The funds maximum exposure under these arrangements is unknown.The fund does not anticipate recognizing any loss related to these arrangements.
(a) Portfolio valuation: Investments in municipal debt securities are valued on the last business day of each week and month by an independent pricing service (the Service). Investments for which quoted bid prices are readily available and are representative of the bid side of the market in the judgment of the Service are valued at the mean between the quoted bid prices (as obtained by the Service from dealers in such securities) and asked prices (as calculated by the Service based upon its evaluation of the market for such securities). Other investments (which constitute a majority of the portfolio securities) are carried at fair value as determined by the Service, based on methods which include consideration of: yields or prices of municipal securities of comparable quality, coupon, maturity and type; indications as to values from dealers; and general market conditions. Options and financial futures on municipal and U.S. Treasury securities are valued at the last sales price on the securities exchange on which such securities are primarily traded or at the last sales price on the national securities market on the last business day of each week and month.
(b) Securities transactions and investment income: Securities transactions are recorded on a trade date basis. Realized gain and loss from securities transactions are recorded on the identified cost basis. Interest income, adjusted for accretion of discount and amortization of premium on investments, is earned from settlement date and recognized on the accrual basis. Securities purchased or sold on a when-issued or delayed-delivery basis may be settled a month or more after the trade date.
(c) Dividends to shareholders of Common Stock (Common Shareholders(s)): Dividends are recorded on the ex-dividend date. Dividends from investment income-net are declared and paid monthly.
The Fund 31
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued) |
Dividends from net realized capital gain, if any, are normally declared and paid annually, but the fund may make distributions on a more frequent basis to comply with the distribution requirements of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the Code). To the extent that net realized capital gain can be offset by capital loss carryovers, it is the policy of the fund not to distribute such gain. Income and capital gain distributions are determined in accordance with income tax regulations, which may differ from U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
For Common Shareholders who elect to receive their distributions in additional shares of the fund, in lieu of cash, such distributions will be reinvested at the lower of the market price or net asset value per share (but not less than 95% of the market price) as defined in the dividend reinvestment and cash purchase plan.
On September 28, 2006, the Board of Directors declared a cash dividend of $.042 per share from investment income-net, payable on November 1, 2006 to Common Shareholders of record as of the close of business on October 16, 2006.
(d) Dividends to shareholders of APS: For APS, dividends are currently reset every 7 days.The dividend rates in effect at September 30, 2006 were as follows: Series M-3.50%, Series T-3.54%, Series W-3.65%, Series TH-3.59% and Series F-3.59% .
(e) Federal income taxes: It is the policy of the fund to continue to qualify as a regulated investment company, which can distribute tax exempt dividends, by complying with the applicable provisions of the Code and to make distributions of income and net realized capital gain sufficient to relieve it from substantially all federal income and excise taxes.
On July 13, 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) released FASB Interpretation No. 48 Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes (FIN 48). FIN 48 provides guidance for how uncertain tax positions should be recognized, measured, presented and disclosed in the financial statements. FIN 48 requires the evaluation of tax positions
32 |
taken or expected to be taken in the course of preparing the funds tax returns to determine whether the tax positions are more-likely-than-not of being sustained by the applicable tax authority.Tax positions not deemed to meet the more-likely-than-not threshold would be recorded as a tax benefit or expense in the current year. Adoption of FIN 48 is required for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2006 and is to be applied to all open tax years as of the effective date. At this time, management is evaluating the implications of FIN 48 and its impact in the financial statements has not yet been determined.
At September 30, 2006, the components of accumulated earnings on a tax basis were as follows: undistributed tax exempt income $2,829,622, accumulated capital losses $53,139,510 and unrealized appreciation $55,452,370.
The accumulated capital loss carryover is available to be applied against future net securities profits, if any, realized subsequent to September 30, 2006. If not applied, $5,230,162 of the carryover expires in fiscal 2009, $76,128 expires in fiscal 2010, $20,575,114 expires in fiscal 2011 and $27,258,106 expires in fiscal 2012.
The tax character of distributions paid to shareholders during the fiscal period ended September 30, 2006 and September 30, 2005, were as follows: tax exempt income $40,437,009 and $40,422,703, respectively.
During the period ended September 30, 2006, as a result of permanent book to tax differences, primarily due to the tax treatment for amortization adjustments, the fund decreased accumulated undistributed investment income-net by $89,325, increased accumulated net realized gain (loss) on investments by $72,930 and increased paid-in capital by the $16,395. Net assets were not affected by this reclassification.
NOTE 2Bank Line of Credit: |
The fund participates with other Dreyfus-managed funds in a $100 million unsecured line of credit primarily to be utilized for temporary or emergency purposes. Interest is charged to the fund based on prevailing market rates in effect at the time of borrowing.
The Fund 33
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued) |
The average daily amount of borrowings outstanding under the line of credit during the period ended September 30, 2006 was approximately $13,600, with a related weighted average annualized interest rate of 4.60% .
NOTE 3Management Fee and Other Transactions With Affiliates:
(a) Pursuant to a management agreement (Agreement) with the Manager, the management fee is computed at the annual rate of .75% of the value of the funds average weekly net assets, inclusive of the outstanding auction preferred stock, and is payable monthly. The Agreement provides for an expense reimbursement from the Manager should the funds aggregate expenses, exclusive of taxes, interest on borrowings, brokerage and extraordinary expenses, in any full fiscal year exceed the lesser of (1) the expense limitation of any state having jurisdiction over the fund or (2) 2% of the first $10 million, 1 1 / 2 % of the next $20 million and 1% of the excess over $30 million of the average value of the funds net assets. The fund has currently undertaken for the period from November 1, 2005 through November 30, 2006, to waive receipt of a portion of the funds management fee, in the amount of .10 of the value of the funds average weekly net assets (including net assets representing auction preferred stock outstanding). The reduction in management fee, pursuant to the undertaking, amounted to $847,978 during the period ended September 30, 2006.
(b)The fund compensates Mellon Trust of New England, N.A., an affiliate of the Manager, under a custody agreement for providing custodial services to the fund. During the period ended September 30, 2006, the fund was charged $145,007 pursuant to the custody agreement.
During the period ended September 30, 2006, the fund was charged $4,374 for services performed by the Chief Compliance Officer.
The components of Due to The Dreyfus Corporation and affiliates in the Statement of Assets and Liabilities consist of: management fees $527,908, custodian fees $49,854 and chief compliance officer fees $2,274, which are offset against an expense reimbursement currently in effect in the amount of $70,388.
34 |
(c) Each Board member also serves as a Board member of other funds within the Dreyfus complex. Annual retainer fees and attendance fees are allocated to each fund based on net assets.
NOTE 4Securities Transactions:
The aggregate amount of purchases and sales of investment securities, excluding short-term securities and financial futures, during the period ended September 30, 2006, amounted to $269,621,452 and $263,567,118, respectively.
The fund may invest in financial futures contracts in order to gain exposure to or protect against changes in the market.The fund is exposed to market risk as a result of changes in the value of the underlying financial instruments. Investments in financial futures require a fund to mark to market on a daily basis, which reflects the change in the market value of the contract at the close of each day's trading.Typically, variation margin payments are received or made to reflect daily unrealized gains or losses. When the contracts are closed, a fund recognizes a realized gain or loss. These investments require initial margin deposits with a broker, which consist of cash or cash equivalents.The amount of these deposits is determined by the exchange or Board of Trade on which the contract is traded and is subject to change. Contracts open at September 30, 2006, are set forth in the Statements of Financial Futures.
At September 30, 2006, the cost of investments for federal income tax purposes was $796,693,503; accumulated net unrealized appreciation on investments was $55,452,370, consisting of $56,444,791 gross unrealized appreciation and $992,421 gross unrealized depreciation.
NOTE 5Restatement: |
Subsequent to the issuance of the September 30, 2006 financial statements, the fund determined that the transfers of certain tax-exempt municipal bond securities by the fund to special purpose bond trusts in connection with participation in inverse floater structures do not qualify for sale treatment under Statement of Financial Accounting Standard
The Fund 35
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued) |
No. 140,Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets and Extinguishment of Liabilities, and should have been accounted for as a secured borrowing.
The correction of the above item resulted in the restatement of the ratio of total and net expenses of the financial highlights table as shown below:
Ratio of Total Expenses | 2006 | 2005 | 2004 | 2003 | 2002 | |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Common Stock: | ||||||||||
As previously reported | 1.37% | 1.37% | 1.38% | 1.40% | 1.38% | |||||
As restated | 1.55% | 1.47% | 1.43% | 1.48% | 1.48% | |||||
Ratio of Net Expenses | 2006 | 2005 | 2004 | 2003 | 2002 | |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Common Stock: | ||||||||||
As previously reported | 1.22% | 1.23% | 1.38% | 1.40% | 1.38% | |||||
As restated | 1.40% | 1.33% | 1.43% | 1.48% | 1.48% | |||||
Ratio of Total Expenses | 2006 | 2005 | 2004 | 2003 | 2002 | |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Common and Preferred Stocks: | ||||||||||
As previously reported | .91% | .91% | .91% | .92% | .91% | |||||
As restated | 1.03% | .98% | .94% | .97% | .98% | |||||
Ratio of Net Expenses | 2006 | 2005 | 2004 | 2003 | 2002 | |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Common and Preferred Stocks: | ||||||||||
As previously reported | .81% | .82% | .91% | .92% | .91% | |||||
As restated | .93% | .89% | .94% | .97% | .98% |
This restatement has no impact on the funds previously reported net assets, net investment income, net asset value per share or total return.
In addition, the statement of investments, the statement of assets and liabilities, the statement of operations and the statement of changes in net assets were also restated as follows:
2006 | 2006 | |||
As Previously Reported | As Restated | |||
|
|
|
||
Portfolio of Investments: | ||||
Total investments | 852,145,873 | 891,350,873 | ||
Identified cost | 796,829,587 | 835,274,074 | ||
Other assets and liabilities | 6,245,165 | (32,959,835) |
36 |
2006 | 2006 | |||
As Previously Reported | As Restated | |||
|
|
|
||
Statement of Assets and Liabilities: | ||||
Total investments in securities, at value | 852,145,873 | 891,350,873 | ||
Identified cost | 796,829,587 | 835,274,074 | ||
Interest receivable | 14,735,861 | 15,276,467 | ||
Total assets | 867,329,635 | 907,075,241 | ||
Payable for floating rate notes issued | | 39,205,000 | ||
Interest and related expenses payable | | 540,606 | ||
Total liabilities | 8,938,597 | 48,684,203 | ||
Net unrealized appreciation | ||||
(depreciation) on investments | 54,904,134 | 55,664,647 | ||
Accumulated net realized | ||||
gain (loss) on investments | (52,591,274) | (53,351,787) | ||
Statement of Operations: | ||||
Investment incomeInterest | 47,127,243 | 48,160,161 | ||
ExpensesInterest and related expenses | | 1,032,918 | ||
Total expenses | 7,719,953 | 8,752,871 | ||
Net expenses | 6,870,487 | 7,903,405 | ||
Net realized gain (loss) on investments | 3,102,010 | 2,341,497 | ||
Net unrealized appreciation | ||||
(depreciation) on investments | 2,205,174 | 2,965,687 | ||
Statement of Changes in Net Assets: | ||||
Net realized gain (loss) on investments | 3,102,010 | 2,341,497 | ||
Net unrealized appreciation | ||||
(depreciation) on investments | 2,205,174 | 2,965,687 |
The Fund 37
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
Shareholders and Board of Directors Dreyfus Strategic Municipals, Inc. |
We have audited the accompanying statement of assets and liabilities of Dreyfus Strategic Municipals,Inc.including the statement of investments, as of September 30, 2006, and the related statement of operations for the year then ended,the statement of changes in net assets for each of the two years in the period then ended, and financial highlights for each of the years indicated therein.These financial statements and financial highlights are the responsibility of the Funds management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and financial highlights based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States).Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements and financial highlights are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements and financial highlights. Our procedures included verification by examination of securities held by the custodian as of September 30, 2006 and confirmation of securities not held by the custodian by correspondence with others. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements and financial highlights referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Dreyfus Strategic Municipals, Inc. at September 30, 2006, the results of its operations for the year then ended, the changes in its net assets for each of the two years in the period then ended, and the financial highlights for each of the indicated years, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
38 |
As discussed in Note 5, the statement of assets and liabilities, including the statement of investments, as of April 30, 2006, and the related statements of operations for the year then ended, the statements of changes in net assets for each of the two years in the period then ended, and financial highlights for each of the periods indicated therein have been restated.
The Fund 39
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION (Unaudited)
Dividend Reinvestment and Cash Purchase Plan
Under the funds Dividend Reinvestment and Cash Purchase Plan (the Plan), a holder of Common Stock who has fund shares registered in his name will have all dividends and distributions reinvested automatically by The Bank of New York, as Plan agent (the Agent), in additional shares of the fund at the lower of prevailing market price or net asset value (but not less than 95% of market value at the time of valuation) unless such shareholder elects to receive cash as provided below. If market price is equal to or exceeds net asset value, shares will be issued at net asset value. If net asset value exceeds market price or if a cash dividend only is declared, the Agent, as agent for the Plan participants, will buy fund shares in the open market.A Plan participant is not relieved of any income tax that may be payable on such dividends or distributions.
A Common Shareholder who owns fund shares registered in nominee name through his broker/dealer (i.e., in street name) may not participate in the Plan, but may elect to have cash dividends and distributions reinvested by his broker/dealer in additional shares of the fund if such service is provided by the broker/dealer; otherwise such dividends and distributions will be treated like any other cash dividend.
A Common Shareholder who has fund shares registered in his name may elect to withdraw from the Plan at any time for a $2.50 fee and thereby elect to receive cash in lieu of shares of the fund. Changes in elections must be in writing, sent to The Bank of New York, Dividend Reinvestment Department, P.O. Box 1958, Newark, New Jersey 07101-9774, should include the shareholders name and address as they appear on the Agents records and will be effective only if received more than fifteen days prior to the record date for any distribution.
A Plan participant who has fund shares in his name has the option of making additional cash payments to the Agent, semi-annually, in any amount from $1,000 to $10,000, for investment in the funds shares in the open market on or about January 15 and July 15. Any voluntary cash payments received more than 30 days prior to these dates will be returned by the Agent, and interest will not be paid on any uninvested cash payments. A participant may withdraw a voluntary cash payment
40 |
by written notice, if the notice is received by the Agent not less than 48 hours before the payment is to be invested. A Common Shareholder who owns fund shares registered in street name should consult his broker/dealer to determine whether an additional cash purchase option is available through his broker/dealer.
The Agent maintains all Common Shareholder accounts in the Plan and furnishes written confirmations of all transactions in the account. Shares in the account of each Plan participant will be held by the Agent in non-certificated form in the name of the participant, and each such participants proxy will include those shares purchased pursuant to the Plan.
The fund pays the Agents fee for reinvestment of dividends and distributions. Plan participants pay a pro rata share of brokerage commissions incurred with respect to the Agents open market purchases and purchases from voluntary cash payments, and a $1.25 fee for each purchase made from a voluntary cash payment.
The fund reserves the right to amend or terminate the Plan as applied to any voluntary cash payments made and any dividend or distribution paid subsequent to notice of the change sent to Plan participants at least 90 days before the record date for such dividend or distribution. The Plan also may be amended or terminated by the Agent on at least 90 days written notice to Plan participants.
Managed Dividend Policy |
The funds dividend policy is to distribute substantially all of its net investment income to its shareholders on a monthly basis. In order to provide shareholders with a more consistent yield to the current trading price of shares of Common Stock of the fund, the fund may at times pay out less than the entire amount of net investment income earned in any particular month and may at times in any month pay out such accumulated but undistributed income in addition to net investment income earned in that month. As a result, the dividends paid by the fund for any particular month may be more or less than the amount of net investment income earned by the fund during such month.
The Fund 41
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION (Unaudited) (continued) |
Benefits and Risks of Leveraging |
The fund utilizes leverage to seek to enhance the yield and net asset value of its Common Stock.These objectives cannot be achieved in all interest rate environments.To leverage, the fund issues Preferred Stock, which pays dividends at prevailing short-term interest rates, and invests the proceeds in long-term municipal bonds. The interest earned on these investments is paid to Common Shareholders in the form of dividends, and the value of these portfolio holdings is reflected in the per share net asset value of the funds Common Stock. In order to benefit Common Shareholders, the yield curve must be positively sloped: that is, short-term interest rates must be lower than long-term interest rates. At the same time, a period of generally declining interest rates will benefit Common Shareholders. If either of these conditions change, then the risk of leveraging will begin to outweigh the benefits.
Supplemental Information |
During the period ended September 30, 2006, there were: (i) no material changes in the funds investment objectives or policies, (ii) no changes in the funds charter or by-laws that would delay or prevent a change of control of the fund, and (iii) no material changes in the principal risk factors associated with investment in the fund.
Certifications |
The funds chief executive officer has certified to the NYSE, pursuant to the requirements of Section 303A.12(a) of the NYSE Listed Company Manual, that, as of August 17, 2006, he was not aware of any violation by the fund of applicable NYSE corporate governance listing standards.The funds reports to the SEC on Form N-CSR contain certifications by the funds chief executive officer and chief financial officer as required by Rule 30a-2(a) under the 1940 Act, including certifications regarding the quality of the funds disclosures in such reports and certifications regarding the funds disclosure controls and procedures and internal control over financial reporting.
42 |
IMPORTANT TAX INFORMATION (Unaudited)
In accordance with federal tax law, the fund hereby designates all the dividends paid from investment income-net during the fiscal year ended September 30, 2006 as exempt-interest dividends (not generally subject to regular federal income tax). As required by federal tax law rules, shareholders will receive notification of their portion of the Funds taxable ordinary dividends (if any) and capital gain distributions (if any) paid for the 2006 calendar year on Form 1099-DIV which will be mailed by January 31, 2007.
The Fund 43
PROXY RESULTS (Unaudited) |
Holders of Common Stock and holders of Auction Preferred Stock (APS) voted together as a single class (except as noted below) on the following proposal presented at the annual shareholders meeting held on May 18, 2006.
Shares | ||||||||
|
|
|
||||||
For | Authority Withheld | |||||||
|
|
|
||||||
To elect three Class III Directors: | ||||||||
David W. Burke | 51,540,489 | 1,306,420 | ||||||
Hans C. Mautner | 51,473,589 | 1,373,320 | ||||||
John E. Zuccotti | 10,321 | 183 | ||||||
| The terms of these Class III Directors expire in 2009. | |||||||
| Elected solely by APS holders, Common Shareholders not entitled to vote. |
44 |
BOARD MEMBERS INFORMATION (Unaudited)
Joseph S. DiMartino (62) |
Chairman of the Board (1995) |
Current term expires in 2007 |
Principal Occupation During Past 5 Years: |
Corporate Director and Trustee |
Other Board Memberships and Affiliations: |
The Muscular Dystrophy Association, Director |
Levcor International, Inc., an apparel fabric processor, Director |
Century Business Services, Inc., a provider of outsourcing functions for small and medium size |
companies, Director |
The Newark Group, a provider of a national market of paper recovery facilities, paperboard |
mills and paperboard converting plants, Director |
Sunair Services Corporation, engaging in the design, manufacture and sale of high frequency |
systems for long-range voice and data communications, as well as providing certain |
outdoor-related services to homes and businesses, Director |
No. of Portfolios for which Board Member Serves: 189 |
|
David W. Burke (70) |
Board Member (1989) |
Current term expires in 2009 |
Principal Occupation During Past 5 Years: |
Corporate Director and Trustee. |
Other Board Memberships and Affiliations: |
John F. Kennedy Library Foundation, Director |
U.S.S. Constitution Museum, Director |
No. of Portfolios for which Board Member Serves: 80 |
|
William Hodding Carter III (71) |
Board Member (1988) |
Current term expires in 2007 |
Principal Occupation During Past 5 Years: |
Professor of Leadership & Public Policy, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill |
(January 1, 2006-present) |
President and Chief Executive Officer of the John S. and James L. Knight Foundation |
(February 1, 1998-February 1, 2006) |
Other Board Memberships and Affiliations: |
The Century Foundation, Emeritus Director |
The Enterprise Corporation of the Delta, Director |
No. of Portfolios for which Board Member Serves: 12 |
The Fund 45
BOARD MEMBERS INFORMATION (Unaudited) (continued)
Ehud Houminer (66) |
Board Member (1994) |
Current term expires in 2008 |
Principal Occupation During Past 5 Years: |
Executive-in-Residence at the Columbia Business School, Columbia University |
Other Board Memberships and Affiliations: |
Avnet Inc., an electronics distributor, Director |
International Advisory Board to the MBA Program School of |
Management, Ben Gurion University, Chairman |
Explore Charter School, Brooklyn, NY,Trustee |
No. of Portfolios for which Board Member Serves: 60 |
|
Richard C. Leone (66) |
Board Member (1989) |
Current term expires in 2007 |
Principal Occupation During Past 5 Years: |
President of The Century Foundation (formerly,The Twentieth Century Fund, Inc.), a tax |
exempt research foundation engaged in the study of economic, foreign policy and domestic issues |
Other Board Memberships and Affiliations: |
The American Prospect, Director |
Center for American Progress, Director |
No. of Portfolios for which Board Member Serves: 12 |
|
Hans C. Mautner (68) |
Board Member (1989) |
Current term expires in 2009 |
Principal Occupation During Past 5 Years: |
PresidentInternational Division and an Advisory Director of Simon Property Group, a real |
estate investment company (1998-present) |
Director and Vice Chairman of Simon Property Group (1998-2003) |
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Simon Global Limited (1999-present) |
Other Board Memberships and Affiliations: |
Capital and Regional PLC, a British co-investing real estate asset manager, Director |
Member - Board of Managers of: |
Mezzacappa Long/Short Fund LLC |
No. of Portfolios for which Board Member Serves: 12 |
46 |
Robin A. Melvin (43) |
Board Member (1995) |
Current term expires in 2008 |
Principal Occupation During Past 5 Years: |
Director, Boisi Family foundation, a private family foundation that supports youth-serving |
organizations that promote the self sufficiency of youth from disadvantaged circumstances |
No. of Portfolios for which Board Member Serves: 12 |
|
John E. Zuccotti (69) |
Board Member (1989) |
Current term expires in 2009 |
Principal Occupation During Past 5 Years: |
Chairman of Brookfield Financial Properties, Inc. |
Senior Counsel of Weil, Gotshal & Manges, LLP |
Chairman of the Real Estate Board of New York |
Other Board Memberships and Affiliations: |
Emigrant Savings Bank, Director |
Wellpoint, Inc., Director |
Visiting Nurse Service of New York, Director |
Columbia University,Trustee |
Doris Duke Charitable Foundation,Trustee |
No. of Portfolios for which Board Member Serves: 12 |
|
The address of the Board Members and Officers is in c/o The Dreyfus Corporation, 200 Park Avenue, New York, |
NewYork 10166. |
The Fund 47
OFFICERS OF THE FUND (Unaudited)
STEPHEN E. CANTER, President since March 2000.
Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of the Manager, and an officer of 90 investment companies (comprised of 189 portfolios) managed by the Manager. Mr. Canter also is a Board member and, where applicable, an Executive Committee Member of the other investment management subsidiaries of Mellon Financial Corporation, each of which is an affiliate of the Manager. He is 61 years old and has been an employee of the Manager since May 1995.
A. PAUL DISDIER, Executive Vice President since March 2000
Executive Vice President of the Fund, Director of Dreyfus Municipal Securities, and an officer of 2 other investment companies (comprised of 2 portfolios) managed by the Manager. He is 51 years old and has been an employee of the Manager since February 1988.
MARK N. JACOBS, Vice President since March 2000.
Executive Vice President, Secretary and General Counsel of the Manager, and an officer of 91 investment companies (comprised of 205 portfolios) managed by the Manager. He is 60 years old and has been an employee of the Manager since June 1977.
MICHAEL A. ROSENBERG, Vice President and Secretary since August 2005.
Associate General Counsel of the Manager, and an officer of 91 investment companies (comprised of 205 portfolios) managed by the Manager. He is 46 years old and has been an employee of the Manager since October 1991.
JAMES BITETTO, Vice President and Assistant Secretary since August 2005.
Associate General Counsel and Assistant Secretary of the Manager, and an officer of 91 investment companies (comprised of 205 portfolios) managed by the Manager. He is 40 years old and has been an employee of the Manager since December 1996.
JONI LACKS CHARATAN, Vice President and Assistant Secretary since August 2005.
Associate General Counsel of the Manager, and an officer of 91 investment companies (comprised of 205 portfolios) managed by the Manager. She is 50 years old and has been an employee of the Manager since October 1988.
JOSEPH M. CHIOFFI, Vice President and Assistant Secretary since August 2005.
Associate General Counsel of the Manager, and an officer of 91 investment companies (comprised of 205 portfolios) managed by the Manager. He is 44 years old and has been an employee of the Manager since June 2000.
JANETTE E. FARRAGHER, Vice President and Assistant Secretary since August 2005.
Associate General Counsel of the Manager, and an officer of 91 investment companies (comprised of 205 portfolios) managed by the Manager. She is 43 years old and has been an employee of the Manager since February 1984
JOHN B. HAMMALIAN, Vice President and Assistant Secretary since August 2005.
Associate General Counsel of the Manager, and an officer of 91 investment companies (comprised of 205 portfolios) managed by the Manager. He is 43 years old and has been an employee of the Manager since February 1991.
ROBERT R. MULLERY, Vice President and Assistant Secretary since August 2005.
Associate General Counsel of the Manager, and an officer of 91 investment companies (comprised of 205 portfolios) managed by the Manager. He is 54 years old and has been an employee of the Manager since May 1986.
48 |
JEFF PRUSNOFSKY, Vice President and Assistant Secretary since August 2005.
Associate General Counsel of the Manager, and an officer of 91 investment companies (comprised of 205 portfolios) managed by the Manager. He is 41 years old and has been an employee of the Manager since October 1990.
JAMES WINDELS, Treasurer since November 2001.
Director Mutual Fund Accounting of the Manager, and an officer of 91 investment companies (comprised of 205 portfolios) managed by the Manager. He is 48 years old and has been an employee of the Manager since April 1985.
ERIK D. NAVILOFF, Assistant Treasurer since August 2005.
Senior Accounting Manager Taxable Fixed Income Funds of the Manager, and an officer of 91 investment companies (comprised of 205 portfolios) managed by the Manager. He is 38 years old and has been an employee of the Manager since November 1992.
ROBERT ROBOL, Assistant Treasurer since August 2005.
Senior Accounting Manager Money Market and Municipal Bond Funds of the Manager, and an officer of 91 investment companies (comprised of 205 portfolios) managed by the Manager. He is 42 years old and has been an employee of the Manager since October 1988.
ROBERT SVAGNA, Assistant Treasurer since August 2005.
Senior Accounting Manager Equity Funds of the Manager, and an officer of 91 investment companies (comprised of 205 portfolios) managed by the Manager. He is 39 years old and has been an employee of the Manager since November 1990.
GAVIN C. REILLY, Assistant Treasurer since December 2005.
Tax Manager of the Investment Accounting and Support Department of the Manager, and an officer of 91 investment companies (comprised of 205 portfolios) managed by the Manager. He is 38 years old and has been an employee of the Manager since April 1991.
JOSEPH W. CONNOLLY, Chief Compliance Officer since October 2004.
Chief Compliance Officer of the Manager and The Dreyfus Family of Funds (91 investment companies, comprised of 205 portfolios). From November 2001 through March 2004, Mr. Connolly was first Vice-President, Mutual Fund Servicing for Mellon Global Securities Services. In that capacity, Mr. Connolly was responsible for managing Mellons Custody, Fund Accounting and Fund Administration services to third-party mutual fund clients. He is 49 years old and has served in various capacities with the Manager since 1980, including manager of the firms Fund Accounting Department from 1997 through October 2001.
The Fund 49
NOTES
50 |
The Fund 51
NOTES
52 |
OFFICERS AND DIRECTORS
D rey f u s S t ra te g i c M u n i c i p a l s , I n c .
200 Park Avenue New York, NY 10166
The Net Asset Value appears in the following publications: Barrons, Closed-End Bond Funds section under the heading |
Municipal Bond Funds every Monday;Wall Street Journal, Mutual Funds section under the heading Closed-End Bond |
Funds every Monday; NewYork Times, Business section under the heading Closed-End Bond FundsNational Municipal |
Bond Funds every Sunday. |
Notice is hereby given in accordance with Section 23(c) of the Investment Company Act of 1940,as amended,that the fund may |
purchase shares of its common stock in the open market when it can do so at prices below the then current net asset value per share. |
The Fund 53
For More Information
Dreyfus Strategic Municipals, Inc. |
200 Park Avenue |
New York, NY 10166 |
Manager |
The Dreyfus Corporation |
200 Park Avenue |
New York, NY 10166 |
Custodian |
Mellon Trust of |
New England, N.A. |
One Boston Place |
Boston, MA 02108 |
Transfer Agent & |
Dividend Disbursing Agent |
and Registrar |
(Common Stock) |
The Bank of New York |
101 Barclay Street |
New York, NY 10286 |
The fund files its complete schedule of portfolio holdings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) for the first and third quarters of each fiscal year on Form N-Q. The fund's Forms N-Q are available on the SECs website at http://www.sec.gov and may be reviewed and copied at the SECs Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. Information on the operation of the Public Reference Room may be obtained by calling 1-202-551-8090.
Information regarding how the fund voted proxies relating to portfolio securities for the 12-month period ended June 30, 2006, is available on the SECs website at http://www.sec.gov and without charge, upon request, by calling 1-800-645-6561.
© 2006 Dreyfus Service Corporation
Item 2. | Code of Ethics. |
The Registrant has adopted a code of ethics that applies to the Registrant's principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer or controller, or persons performing similar functions. There have been no amendments to, or waivers in connection with, the Code of Ethics during the period covered by this Report.
Item 3. | Audit Committee Financial Expert. |
The Registrant's Board has determined that Richard C. Leone, a member of the Audit Committee of the Board, is an audit committee financial expert as defined by the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC"). Richard C. Leone is "independent" as defined by the SEC for purposes of audit committee financial expert determinations.
Item 4. | Principal Accountant Fees and Services |
(a) Audit Fees. The aggregate fees billed for each of the last two fiscal years (the "Reporting Periods") for professional services rendered by the Registrant's principal accountant (the "Auditor") for the audit of the Registrant's annual financial statements, or services that are normally provided by the Auditor in connection with the statutory and regulatory filings or engagements for the Reporting Periods, were $34,374 in 2005 and $36,008 in 2006.
(b) Audit-Related Fees. The aggregate fees billed in the Reporting Periods for assurance and related services by the Auditor that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit of the Registrant's financial statements and are not reported under paragraph (a) of this Item 4 were $4,725 in 2005 and $21,922 in 2006. These services consisted of (i) security counts required by Rule 17f-2 under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended.
The aggregate fees billed in the Reporting Periods for non-audit assurance and related services by the Auditor to the Registrant's investment adviser (not including any sub-investment adviser whose role is primarily portfolio management and is subcontracted with or overseen by another investment adviser), and any entity controlling, controlled by or under common control with the investment adviser that provides ongoing services to the Registrant ("Service Affiliates"), that were reasonably related to the performance of the annual audit of the Service Affiliate, which required pre-approval by the Audit Committee were $0 in 2005 and $0 in 2006.
Note: For the second paragraph in each of (b) through (d) of this Item 4, certain of such services were not pre-approved prior to May 6, 2003, when such services were required to be pre-approved. On and after May 6, 2003, 100% of all services provided by the Auditor were pre-approved as required. For comparative purposes, the fees shown assume that all such services were pre-approved, including services that were not pre-approved prior to the compliance date of the pre-approval requirement.
(c) Tax Fees. The aggregate fees billed in the Reporting Periods for professional services rendered by the Auditor for tax compliance, tax advice and tax planning ("Tax Services") were $3,018 in 2005 and $3,235 in 2006. These services consisted of (i) review or preparation of U.S. federal, state, local and excise tax returns; (ii) U.S. federal, state and local tax planning, advice and assistance regarding statutory, regulatory or administrative developments, and (iii) tax advice regarding tax qualification matters and/or treatment of various financial instruments held or proposed to be acquired or held.
-2- |
The aggregate fees billed in the Reporting Periods for Tax Services by the Auditor to Service Affiliates which required pre-approval by the Audit Committee were $0 in 2005 and $0 in 2006.
(d) All Other Fees. The aggregate fees billed in the Reporting Periods for products and services provided by the Auditor, other than the services reported in paragraphs (a) through (c) of this Item, were $0 in 2005 and $0 in 2006. These services consisted of a review of the Registrant's anti-money laundering program.
The aggregate fees billed in the Reporting Periods for Non-Audit Services by the Auditor to Service Affiliates, other than the services reported in paragraphs (b) through (c) of this Item, which required pre-approval by the Audit Committee were $0 in 2005 and $0 in 2006.
Audit Committee Pre-Approval Policies and Procedures. The Registrant's Audit Committee has established policies and procedures (the "Policy") for pre-approval (within specified fee limits) of the Auditor's engagements for non-audit services to the Registrant and Service Affiliates without specific case-by-case consideration. Pre-approval considerations include whether the proposed services are compatible with maintaining the Auditor's independence. Pre-approvals pursuant to the Policy are considered annually.
Non-Audit Fees. The aggregate non-audit fees billed by the Auditor for services rendered to the Registrant, and rendered to Service Affiliates, for the Reporting Periods were $761,002 in 2005 and $443,981 in 2006.
Auditor Independence. The Registrant's Audit Committee has considered whether the provision of non-audit services that were rendered to Service Affiliates which were not pre-approved (not requiring pre-approval) is compatible with maintaining the Auditor's independence.
Item 5. | Audit Committee of Listed Registrants. |
The Registrant has a separately-designated standing Audit Committee established in accordance with Section 3(a) (58)(A) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, consisting of the following members: Richard C. Leone, Joseph S. DiMartino, David W. Burke, Hodding Carter III, Ehud Houminer, Hans C. Mautner, Robin A. Melvin, and John E. Zuccotti.
Item 6. | Schedule of Investments. | |
Not applicable. | ||
Item 7. | Disclosure of Proxy Voting Policies and Procedures for Closed-End Management | |
Investment Companies. | ||
Not applicable. | ||
Item 8. | Portfolio Managers of Closed-End Management Investment Companies. |
(a) (1) The following information is as of November 28, 2006, the date of the filing of this report:
W. Michael Petty has been the primary portfolio manager of the Registrant since November 2001 and has been employed by The Dreyfus Corporation (Dreyfus) since June 1997.
(a) (2) The following information is as of the Registrants most recently completed fiscal year, except where otherwise noted:
Portfolio Managers. The Manager manages the Fund's portfolio of investments in accordance with the stated policies of the Fund, subject to the approval of the Fund's Board. The Manager is responsible for investment
-3- |
decisions and provides the Fund with portfolio managers who are authorized by the Fund's Board to execute purchases and sales of securities. The Fund's portfolio managers are W. Michael Petty, Joseph P. Darcy, A. Paul Disdier, Douglas J. Gaylor, Joseph A. Irace, Colleen A. Meehan, Bill Vasiliou, James Welch and Monica S. Wieboldt. The Manager also maintains a research department with a professional staff of portfolio managers and securities analysts who provide research services for the Fund and for other funds advised by the Manager.
Portfolio Manager Compensation. Portfolio manager compensation is comprised primarily of a market-based salary and an incentive compensation plan. The Funds portfolio managers are compensated by Dreyfus or its affiliates and not by the Fund. The incentive compensation plan is comprised of three components: Fund performance (approximately 60%), individual qualitative performance (approximately 20%) and Dreyfus financial performance as measured by Dreyfus pre-tax net income (approximately 20%). Up to 10% of the incentive plan compensation may be paid in Mellon restricted stock.
Portfolio performance is measured by a combination of yield (35%) and total return (65%) relative to the appropriate Lipper peer group. 1-year performance in each category is weighted at 40% and 3-year performance at 60%. The portfolio managers performance is measured on either a straight average (each account weighted equally) or a combination of straight average and asset-weighted average. Generally, if the asset-weighted average is higher, then that is used to measure performance. If the straight average is higher, then typically an average of the two is used to measure performance.
Individual qualitative performance is based on Dreyfus Chief Investment Officers evaluation of the portfolio managers performance based on any combination of the following: marketing contributions; new product development; performance on special assignments; people development; methodology enhancements; fund growth/gain in market; and support to colleagues. The Chief Investment Officer may consider additional factors at his discretion.
Portfolio managers are also eligible for Dreyfus Long Term Incentive Plan. Under that plan, cash and/or Mellon restricted stock is awarded at the discretion of the Chief Investment Officer based on individual performance and contributions to the Investment Management Department and the Mellon organization.
Additional Information About Portfolio Managers. The following table lists the number and types of other accounts advised by the Funds primary portfolio manager and assets under management in those accounts as of the end of the Funds fiscal year:
Registered | ||||||||||||
Investment | ||||||||||||
Portfolio | Company | Assets | Pooled | Assets | Other | Assets | ||||||
Manager | Accounts | Managed | Accounts | Managed | Accounts | Managed | ||||||
W. Michael Petty | 8 | $2.6 billion | 0 | $0 | 0 | $0 |
None of the funds or accounts are subject to a performance-based advisory fee.
The dollar range of Fund shares beneficially owned by the primary portfolio manager are as follows as of the end of the Funds fiscal year:
Dollar Range of Registrant | ||||
Portfolio Manager | Registrant Name | Shares Beneficially Owned | ||
W. Michael Petty | Dreyfus Strategic Municipals, Inc. | None |
-4- |
Portfolio managers may manage multiple accounts for a diverse client base, including mutual funds, separate accounts (assets managed on behalf of institutions such as pension funds, insurance companies and foundations), bank common trust accounts and wrap fee programs (Other Accounts).
Potential conflicts of interest may arise because of Dreyfus management of the Fund and Other Accounts. For example, conflicts of interest may arise with both the aggregation and allocation of securities transactions and allocation of limited investment opportunities, as Dreyfus may be perceived as causing accounts it manages to participate in an offering to increase Dreyfus overall allocation of securities in that offering, or to increase Dreyfus ability to participate in future offerings by the same underwriter or issuer. Allocations of bunched trades, particularly trade orders that were only partially filled due to limited availability and allocation of investment opportunities generally, could raise a potential conflict of interest, as Dreyfus may have an incentive to allocate securities that are expected to increase in value to preferred accounts. Initial public offerings, in particular, are frequently of very limited availability. Additionally, portfolio managers may be perceived to have a conflict of interest if there are a large number of Other Accounts, in addition to the Fund, that they are managing on behalf of Dreyfus. Dreyfus periodically reviews each portfolio managers overall responsibilities to ensure that he or she is able to allocate the necessary time and resources to effectively manage the Fund. In addition, Dreyfus could be viewed as having a conflict of interest to the extent that Dreyfus or its affiliates and/or portfolio managers have a materially larger investment in Other Accounts than their investment in the Fund.
Other Accounts may have investment objectives, strategies and risks that differ from those of the Fund. For these or other reasons, the portfolio manager may purchase different securities for the Fund and the Other Accounts, and the performance of securities purchased for the Fund may vary from the performance of securities purchased for Other Accounts. The portfolio manager may place transactions on behalf of Other Accounts that are directly or indirectly contrary to investment decisions made for the Fund, which could have the potential to adversely impact the Fund, depending on market conditions.
A potential conflict of interest may be perceived to arise if transactions in one account closely follow related transactions in another account, such as when a purchase increases the value of securities previously purchased by the other account, or when a sale in one account lowers the sale price received in a sale by a second account.
Dreyfus goal is to provide high quality investment services to all of its clients, while meeting Dreyfus fiduciary obligation to treat all clients fairly. Dreyfus has adopted and implemented policies and procedures, including brokerage and trade allocation policies and procedures that it believes address the conflicts associated with managing multiple accounts for multiple clients. In addition, Dreyfus monitors a variety of areas, including compliance with Fund guidelines, the allocation of IPOs, and compliance with the firms Code of Ethics. Furthermore, senior investment and business personnel at Dreyfus periodically review the performance of the portfolio managers for Dreyfus-managed funds.
Item 9. | Purchases of Equity Securities by Closed-End Management Investment Companies and | |
Affiliated Purchasers. | ||
None | ||
Item 10. | Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders. |
The Registrant has a Nominating Committee (the "Committee"), which is responsible for selecting and nominating persons for election or appointment by the Registrant's Board as Board members. The Committee has adopted a Nominating Committee Charter (the "Charter"). Pursuant to the Charter, the Committee will consider recommendations for nominees from shareholders submitted to the Secretary of the Registrant, c/o The Dreyfus Corporation Legal Department, 200 Park Avenue, 8th Floor East, New York, New York 10166. A nomination
-5- |
submission must include information regarding the recommended nominee as specified in the Charter. This information includes all information relating to a recommended nominee that is required to be disclosed in solicitations or proxy statements for the election of Board members, as well as information sufficient to evaluate the factors to be considered by the Committee, including character and integrity, business and professional experience, and whether the person has the ability to apply sound and independent business judgment and would act in the interests of the Registrant and its shareholders. Nomination submissions are required to be accompanied by a written consent of the individual to stand for election if nominated by the Board and to serve if elected by the shareholders, and such additional information must be provided regarding the recommended nominee as reasonably requested by the Committee.
Item 11. | Controls and Procedures. |
(a) The Registrant's principal executive and principal financial officers have concluded, based on their evaluation of the Registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days of the filing date of this report, that the Registrant's disclosure controls and procedures are reasonably designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Registrant on Form N-CSR is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the required time periods and that information required to be disclosed by the Registrant in the reports that it files or submits on Form N-CSR is accumulated and communicated to the Registrant's management, including its principal executive and principal financial officers, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
(b) The Registrant has revised its internal control over financial reporting with respect to a change in accounting for investments in certain inverse floater structures. As a consequence of this change, Dreyfus Strategic Municipals, Inc. has restated one or more sections of certain of its historical financial statements to account for these investments as secured borrowings and to report the related income and expense.
Item 12. | Exhibits. |
(a)(1) | Code of ethics referred to in Item 2. | |
(a)(2) | Certifications of principal executive and principal financial officers as required by Rule 30a-2(a) under the | |
Investment Company Act of 1940. | ||
(a)(3) | Not applicable. | |
(b) | Certification of principal executive and principal financial officers as required by Rule 30a-2(b) under the | |
Investment Company Act of 1940. |
-6- |
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, the Registrant has duly caused this Report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
Dreyfus Strategic Municipals, Inc. |
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, this Report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
EXHIBIT INDEX | ||
(a)(1) | Code of ethics referred to in Item 2. | |
(a)(2) | Certifications of principal executive and principal financial officers as required by Rule 30a-2(a) | |
under the Investment Company Act of 1940. (EX-99.CERT) | ||
(b) | Certification of principal executive and principal financial officers as required by Rule 30a-2(b) | |
under the Investment Company Act of 1940. (EX-99.906CERT) |
-7- |