Edgar Filing: JACOBS ENGINEERING GROUP INC /DE/

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Form 10-Q

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

Quarterly Report on

FORM 10-Q

(Mark one)

x	Quarterly Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

For the quarterly period ended April 1, 2011

¨	Transition Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

For the transition period from to

Commission File Number 1-7463

JACOBS ENGINEERING GROUP INC.

(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)


Delaware		95-4081636
(State of incorporation)		(I.R.S. employer identification number)

1111 South Arroyo Parkway, Pasadena, California		91105
(Address of principal executive offices)		(Zip code)

(626) 578 – 3500

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Indicate by check-mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days: x Yes ¨ No

Indicate by check-mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). x Yes ¨ No

Indicate by check-mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Indicate by check-mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). ¨ Yes x No

Number of shares of common stock outstanding at April 20, 2011: 126,811,225

JACOBS ENGINEERING GROUP INC.

INDEX TO FORM 10-Q


			Page No.

PART I	FINANCIAL INFORMATION

	Item 1.	Financial Statements

		Consolidated Balance Sheets – April 1, 2011 (Unaudited) and October 1, 2010		3

		Consolidated Statements of Earnings – Unaudited Three and Six Months Ended April 1, 2011 and April 2, 2010		4

		Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income – Unaudited Three and Six Months Ended April 1, 2011 and April 2, 2010		5

		Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows – Unaudited Six Months Ended April 1, 2011 and April 2, 2010		6

		Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements – Unaudited		7 – 14

	Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations		15 – 20

	Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk		21

	Item 4.	Controls and Procedures		21

PART II	OTHER INFORMATION

	Item 1.	Legal Proceedings		22

	Item 1A.	Risk Factors		23

	Item 6.	Exhibits		24

SIGNATURES				25

Page 2

Part I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1.

Financial Statements.

JACOBS ENGINEERING GROUP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(In thousands, except share information)


	April 1, 2011 (Unaudited)			October 1, 2010
ASSETS
Current Assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	747,911		$	938,842
Receivables		1,984,258			1,659,844
Deferred income taxes		127,047			117,698
Prepaid expenses and other		74,298			50,658

Total current assets		2,933,514			2,767,042

Property, Equipment and Improvements, Net		234,548			215,032

Other Noncurrent Assets:
Goodwill		1,731,661			1,118,889
Miscellaneous		737,890			582,954

Total other non-current assets		2,469,551			1,701,843

	$	5,637,613		$	4,683,917

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Current Liabilities:
Notes payable	$	54,538		$	79,399
Accounts payable		306,026			303,877
Accrued liabilities		815,287			661,278
Billings in excess of costs		290,795			194,899
Income taxes payable		19,678			—

Total current liabilities		1,486,324			1,239,453

Long-term Debt		379,696			509

Other Deferred Liabilities		722,139			579,027

Commitments and Contingencies
Stockholders’ Equity:
Capital stock:
Preferred stock, $1 par value, authorized—1,000,000 shares; issued and outstanding—none		—			—
Common stock, $1 par value, authorized—240,000,000 shares; issued and outstanding—126,754,391 shares and 125,909,073 shares, respectively		126,754			125,909
Additional paid-in capital		811,765			767,514
Retained earnings		2,386,861			2,251,366
Accumulated other comprehensive loss		(284,571	)		(285,741	)

Total Jacobs stockholders’ equity		3,040,809			2,859,048
Noncontrolling interests		8,645			5,880

Total Group stockholders’ equity		3,049,454			2,864,928

	$	5,637,613		$	4,683,917

See the accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

Page 3

JACOBS ENGINEERING GROUP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EARNINGS

For the Three and Six Months Ended April 1, 2011 and April 2, 2010

(In thousands, except per share information)


	For the Three Months Ended						For the Six Months Ended
	April 1, 2011			April 2, 2010			April 1, 2011			April 2, 2010
Revenues	$	2,558,016		$	2,586,974		$	4,914,191		$	5,064,759
Costs and Expenses:
Direct cost of contracts		(2,168,835	)		(2,223,793	)		(4,193,972	)		(4,352,369	)
Selling, general and administrative expenses		(261,166	)		(241,177	)		(488,585	)		(476,905	)

Operating Profit		128,015			122,004			231,634			235,485
Other Income (Expense):
Interest income		1,149			796			2,073			1,634
Interest expense		(2,720	)		(705	)		(3,547	)		(1,317	)
Miscellaneous income (expense), net		37			(935	)		44			(1,494	)

Total other income (expense), net		(1,534	)		(844	)		(1,430	)		(1,177	)

Earnings Before Taxes		126,481			121,160			230,204			234,308
Income Tax Expense		(45,140	)		(43,593	)		(82,166	)		(84,340	)

Net Earnings of the Group		81,341			77,567			148,038			149,968
Net Income Attributable to Noncontrolling Interests		(1,091	)		(67	)		(1,965	)		(31	)

Net Earnings Attributable to Jacobs	$	80,250		$	77,500		$	146,073		$	149,937

Net Earnings Per Share:
Basic	$	0.64		$	0.63		$	1.17		$	1.21
Diluted	$	0.63		$	0.62		$	1.15		$	1.20

See the accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

Page 4

JACOBS ENGINEERING GROUP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

For the Three and Six Months Ended April 1, 2011 and April 2, 2010

(In thousands)

(Unaudited)


	For the Three Months Ended						For the Six Months Ended
	April 1, 2011			April 2, 2010			April 1, 2011			April 2, 2010
Net Earnings of the Group	$	81,341		$	77,567		$	148,038		$	149,968

Other Comprehensive Income (Loss):
Foreign currency translation adjustment		6,743			(12,256	)		7,057			(6,307	)
Gain (loss) on cash flow hedges		1,010			(498	)		2,076			876
Change in pension liability		(11,114	)		11,571			(6,547	)		9,428

Other comprehensive income (loss) before taxes		(3,361	)		(1,183	)		2,586			3,997
Income tax benefit		62			(2,918	)		(1,416	)		(2,790	)

Net other comprehensive income (loss)		(3,299	)		(4,101	)		1,170			1,207

Net Comprehensive Income of the Group		78,042			73,466			149,208			151,175
Net Comprehensive Income Attributable to Noncontrolling Interests		(1,091	)		(67	)		(1,965	)		(31	)

Net Comprehensive Income Attributable to Jacobs	$	76,951		$	73,399		$	147,243		$	151,144

See the accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

Page 5

JACOBS ENGINEERING GROUP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

For the Six Months Ended April 1, 2011 and April 2, 2010

(In thousands)

(Unaudited)


	2011			2010
Cash Flows from Operating Activities:
Net earnings attributable to the group	$	148,038		$	149,968
Adjustments to reconcile net earnings to net cash flows from operations:
Depreciation and amortization:
Property, equipment and improvements		28,408			33,265
Intangible assets		15,559			11,576
Stock based compensation		13,125			11,585
Excess tax benefits from stock based compensation		(3,830	)		(1,477	)
(Gains)/losses on sales of assets, net		(130	)		11
Changes in certain assets and liabilities, excluding the effects of businesses acquired:
Receivables		(150,682	)		(53,874	)
Prepaid expenses and other current assets		(13,442	)		6,142
Accounts payable		(55,158	)		(33,211	)
Accrued liabilities		34,029			(2,860	)
Billings in excess of costs		43,962			3,433
Income taxes payable		14,838			(8,768	)
Deferred income taxes		3,194			1,017
Other, net		(884	)		360

Net cash provided by operating activities		77,027			117,167

Cash Flows from Investing Activities:
Additions to property and equipment		(17,378	)		(23,372	)
Disposals of property and equipment		1,709			12,179
Purchases of investments		—			(105,075	)
Other changes in investments		2,607			(16,645	)
Acquisitions of businesses, net of cash acquired		(617,820	)		(261,850	)
Other, net		(1,621	)		(11,296	)

Net cash used for investing activities		(632,503	)		(406,059	)

Cash Flows from Financing Activities:
Proceeds from long-term borrowings		611,996			—
Repayments of long-term borrowings		(238,736	)		(150	)
Net change in short-term borrowings		(26,197	)		79,218
Proceeds from issuances of common stock		22,152			18,062
Excess tax benefits from stock based compensation		3,830			1,477
Other, net		(8,575	)		(5,847	)

Net cash provided by financing activities		364,470			92,760

Effect of Exchange Rate Changes		75			1,570

Net Decrease in Cash and Cash Equivalents		(190,931	)		(194,562	)
Cash and Cash Equivalents at the Beginning of the Period		938,842			1,033,619

Cash and Cash Equivalents at the End of the Period	$	747,911		$	839,057

See the accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

Page 6

JACOBS ENGINEERING GROUP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – UNAUDITED

April 1, 2011

(continued)

Basis of Presentation

Unless the context otherwise requires:

•

References herein to “Jacobs” are to Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. and its predecessors;

•

References herein to the “Company,” “we,” “us” or “our” are to Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. and its consolidated subsidiaries; and

•

References herein to the “Group” are to the combined economic interests and activities of the Company and the persons and entities holding noncontrolling interests in our consolidated subsidiaries.

The accompanying consolidated financial statements and financial information included herein have been prepared pursuant to the interim period reporting requirements of Form 10-Q. Consequently, certain information and note disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States have been condensed or omitted. Readers of this report should also read our consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended October 1, 2010 (“2010 Form 10-K”) as well as Item 7—Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations also included in our 2010 Form 10-K.

In the opinion of management, the accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements contain all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring adjustments) necessary for a fair presentation of our consolidated financial statements at April 1, 2011 and for the three and six month periods ended April 1, 2011 and April 2, 2010.

The Company has evaluated subsequent events through the date of filing this Form 10-Q with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. Subsequent to the end of the second fiscal quarter, the Company acquired an office building located in Houston, Texas. The office building was previously leased by the Company and continues to be used in its operations. Also subsequent to the end of the second fiscal quarter, the Company completed the acquisition of Aker Projects (Shanghai) Company Limited (this transaction occurred in connection with the Aker Solutions ASA transaction discussed below). The total cash paid in connection with these two transactions totaled approximately $79.1 million.

Our interim results of operations are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full fiscal year.

New Accounting Standards

In June 2009, the FASB revised the accounting for variable interest entities (“VIEs”). These revisions require the Company to perform an analysis to determine whether it is the primary beneficiary of its VIEs. The Company is deemed to be the primary beneficiary of a VIE if it has (i) the power to direct the activities of the VIE that most significantly impact the VIE’s economic performance, and (ii) the obligation to absorb losses or the right to receive benefits that could potentially be significant to the VIE. The revisions adopted by the FASB eliminate the quantitative approach previously required for determining the primary beneficiary of a VIE and significantly enhances disclosures. The new accounting requirements became effective for the Company as of the beginning of fiscal 2011. The adoption of this revised standard did not have a material effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

Page 7

JACOBS ENGINEERING GROUP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – UNAUDITED

April 1, 2011

(continued)

Business Combinations

Acquisitions of TechTeam, Sula, DSWA, Magellan Consulting, and Alpha Telecom

In October 2010, we acquired TechTeam Government Solutions, Inc. (“TechTeam”), formerly a wholly-owned subsidiary of TechTeam Global, Inc. TechTeam is a 500-person information technology (“IT”) solutions company that provides support to U.S. federal, state and local government agencies, including the United States Department of Homeland Security, U.S. Army and U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. The firm’s core competencies include systems integration, enterprise application integration, ERP implementation support, IT infrastructure support, network operations management, and call center operations. The primary purpose for acquiring TechTeam was to expand the Company’s IT, modeling, and simulation services capabilities with the U.S. federal government.

Also in October 2010, we acquired Sula Systems Ltd (“Sula”), a 70-person professional services firm headquartered in Gloucestershire, England. Founded in 1996, Sula provides systems engineering and technical services on large, complex programs and projects to clients in the United Kingdom’s defense and aerospace markets. Sula is also involved in a number of major defense programs in areas such as armored vehicles, complex weapons, test and evaluation, submarine nuclear propulsion, and capability and network level systems engineering. Sula also provides services relating to civil airliners and space-based subsystems. The primary purpose for acquiring Sula was to expand the Company’s position in the defense and aerospace markets.

In December 2010, we acquired the assets of Damon S. Williams Associates, L.L.C. (“DSWA”). DSWA is a 50 person professional services firm headquartered in Phoenix, Arizona specializing in water and wastewater facilities, with expertise in planning, design, construction administration and operations services.

Also in December 2010 we acquired the assets of two other niche firms (i) Magellan Consulting which provides services to clients in the education market, and (ii) Alpha Telecom Services Company which provides services to clients in the telecommunications industry.

The results of operations of the acquired businesses have been included in the Company’s consolidated results of operations commencing with the dates control of the acquired businesses were obtained.

The above acquisitions were not material to the Company’s consolidated financial statements at April 1, 2011 and for the three and six month periods ended April 1, 2011.

The Aker Solutions ASA Transaction

On February 1, 2011, the Company acquired certain operations within the process and construction business of Aker Solutions ASA. We believe this acquisition will significantly expand Jacobs’ global presence in the mining and metals market; provide a new geographic region with South America; and strengthen Jacobs’ presence in China and Australia. Jacobs’ regional presence in Europe and North America will also be enhanced as a result of this acquisition. The acquisition is expected to be modestly accretive to earnings in fiscal 2011.

The purchase price was $675.0 million plus approximately $238.0 million representing a preliminary estimate of cash and working capital acquired. At closing, the Company funded approximately $877.3 million (representing the purchase price per the share purchase agreement (“SPA”) less adjustments for (i) certain transactions specified in the SPA, and (ii) the

Page 8

JACOBS ENGINEERING GROUP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – UNAUDITED

April 1, 2011

(continued)

purchase price for an entity located in China, which did not close until after the end of the second quarter of fiscal 2011). The acquisition was financed through a combination of cash-on-hand and borrowings under a number of new, bilateral credit facilities with major U.S. and European banks. The results of operations of the Aker Entities have been included in the Company’s consolidated results of operations commencing with the date control of the entities was obtained.

The following table presents the unaudited, pro forma consolidated results of operations for each of the three and six month periods ended April 1, 2011 and April 2, 2010 as if the acquisition of the Aker Solutions’ P&C operations had occurred at the beginning of fiscal 2010. These pro forma results are not necessarily indicative of (i) the results of operations that would have occurred had the Aker Solutions’ P&C operations actually been acquired at the beginning of fiscal 2010; and (ii) future results of operations (in thousands):


	For the Three Months Ended				For the Six Months Ended
	April 1, 2011		April 2, 2010		April 1, 2011		April 2, 2010
Revenues	$	2,605,634	$	2,730,911	$	5,186,846		5,397,038
Net earnings attributable to Jacobs		82,545		81,028		156,117		154,820

The purchase price allocation is subject to revision. Additional valuation work is being conducted regarding customer relationships, backlog, and technology, and the final allocation will be made when such valuation work is completed. The following table presents the preliminary allocation to the net assets of the Aker Solutions’ P&C operations acquired as of the date of acquisition (in thousands):


Assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	317,870
Receivables and other current assets		140,024
Property and equipment, and other		120,538

Total assets		578,432

Liabilities:
Current liabilities		186,339
Long-term liabilities		21,445

Total liabilities		207,784

Net assets acquired	$	370,648

The Company expects to collect substantially all of the acquired receivables of $129.3 million.

The SPA includes a net cash adjustment and working capital adjustment (as defined). The net cash and working capital of the businesses acquired at closing will be compared to reference amounts as specified in the SPA. If the net cash and working capital acquired exceeds the reference amounts by more than $25 million, then the Company must pay such excess to the seller; and if the reference amounts for net cash and working capital exceed the amounts actually acquired by more than $25 million, then the seller must pay such deficiency to the Company. These payments are subject to a cap of $175.8 million. We are in the process of determining any net cash and working capital adjustments.

Page 9

JACOBS ENGINEERING GROUP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – UNAUDITED

April 1, 2011

(continued)

We are currently in the process of determining the values of separately identifiable intangible assets acquired as part of the transaction. The preliminary estimate of goodwill from this transaction is summarized as follows (in millions):


Purchase price	$	877
Amount assigned to the net assets acquired		(371	)
Estimated amount assigned to intangible assets		(202	)

Goodwill created, preliminary	$	304

Some of the factors contributing to a purchase price that resulted in the recognition of goodwill include: (i) the opportunity to expand our client base in the United States, the United Kingdom, Canada, Australia, and China; (ii) the opportunity to enter new geography in South America; (iii) the opportunity to expand our presence in the mining and metals market; (iv) the existence of a large, highly-trained and stable workforce; (v) the existence of operating synergies; and (vi) the existence of geographic synergies.

Receivables

The following table presents the components of “Receivables” appearing in the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets at April 1, 2011 and October 1, 2010 as well as certain other related information (in thousands):


	April 1, 2011			October 1, 2010
Components of receivables:
Amounts billed	$	947,972		$	829,518
Unbilled receivables and other		973,805			793,918
Retentions receivable		74,216			47,165
Allowance for doubtful accounts		(11,735	)		(10,757	)

Total receivables, net	$	1,984,258		$	1,659,844

Other information about receivables:
Amounts due from the United States federal government, included above, net of advanced billings	$	319,404		$	309,176

Claims receivable	$	23,379		$	14,201

Unbilled receivables represent reimbursable costs and amounts earned and reimbursable under contracts in progress as of the respective balance sheet dates. Such amounts become billable according to the contract terms, which usually consider the passage of time, achievement of certain milestones or completion of the project. We anticipate that substantially all of such unbilled amounts will be billed and collected over the next twelve months.

Claims receivable are included in “Receivables” in the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets and represent costs incurred on contracts to the extent it is probable that such claims will result in additional contract revenue and the amount of such additional revenue can be reliably estimated.

Page 10

JACOBS ENGINEERING GROUP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – UNAUDITED

April 1, 2011

(continued)

Property, Equipment and Improvements, Net

Property, Equipment and Improvements, net in the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets at April 1, 2011 and October 1, 2010 consisted of the following (in thousands):


	April 1, 2011			October 1, 2010
Land	$	19,543		$	12,223
Buildings		103,413			90,565
Equipment		473,259			433,395
Leasehold improvements		149,438			142,358
Construction in progress		10,413			3,570

		756,066			682,111
Accumulated depreciation and amortization		(521,518	)		(467,079	)

	$	234,548		$	215,032

Revenue Accounting for Contracts / Accounting for Joint Ventures

In general, we recognize revenues at the time we provide services. Depending on the commercial terms of the contract, we recognize revenues either when costs are incurred, or using the percentage-of-completion method of accounting by relating contract costs incurred to date to the total estimated costs at completion. Contract losses are provided for in their entirety in the period they become known, without regard to the percentage-of-completion.

The nature of our business sometimes results in clients, subcontractors or vendors presenting claims to us for recovery of costs they incurred in excess of what they expected to incur, or for which they believe they are not contractually responsible. In those situations where a claim against us may result in additional costs to the contract, we include in the total estimated costs of the contract (and therefore, the estimated amount of margin to be earned under the contract) an estimate, based on all relevant facts and circumstances available, of the additional costs to be incurred. Similarly, and in the normal course of business, we may present claims to our clients for costs we have incurred for which we believe we are not contractually responsible. With respect to such claims, we include in revenues the amount of costs incurred, without profit, to the extent it is probable that the claims will result in additional contract revenue, and the amount of such additional revenue can be reliably estimated. Costs associated with unapproved change orders are included in revenues using substantially the same criteria used for claims.

Certain cost-reimbursable contracts include incentive-fee arrangements. The incentive fees in such contracts can be based on a variety of factors but the most common are the achievement of target completion dates or target costs, and/or meeting other performance criteria as defined in the contracts. Failure to meet these targets can result in unrealized incentive fees. We recognize incentive fees based on expected results using the percentage-of-completion method of accounting. As the contract progresses and more information becomes available, the estimate of the anticipated incentive fee that will be earned is revised as necessary. We bill incentive fees based on the terms and conditions of the individual contracts. In certain situations we are allowed to bill a portion of the incentive fees over the performance period of the contract. In other situations, we are allowed to bill incentive fees only after the target criterion has been achieved. Incentive fees which have been recognized but not billed are included in receivables in the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets.

Certain cost-reimbursable contracts with government customers as well as certain commercial clients provide that contract costs are subject to audit and adjustment. In this

Page 11

JACOBS ENGINEERING GROUP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – UNAUDITED

April 1, 2011

(continued)

situation, revenues are recorded at the time services are performed based upon the amounts we expect to realize upon completion of the contracts. Revenues are not recognized for non-recoverable costs. In those situations where an audit indicates that we may have billed a client for costs not allowable under the terms of the contract, we estimate the amount of such nonbillable costs and adjust our revenues accordingly.

As is common to the industry, we execute certain contracts jointly with third parties through various forms of joint ventures and consortiums.

Very few of our joint ventures have employees. Although the joint ventures own and hold the contracts with the clients, the services required by the contracts are typically performed by us and our joint venture partners, or by other subcontractors under subcontracting agreements with the joint ventures. The assets of our joint ventures, therefore, consist almost entirely of cash and receivables (representing amounts due from clients), and the liabilities of our joint ventures consist almost entirely of amounts due to the joint venture partners (for services provided by the partners to the joint ventures under their individual subcontracts) and other subcontractors. In general, at any given time, the equity of our joint ventures represents the undistributed profits earned on contracts the joint ventures hold with clients. None of our joint ventures have third-party debt or credit facilities. Our joint ventures, therefore, are simply mechanisms used to deliver engineering and construction services to clients. Rarely do they, in and of themselves, present any risk of loss to us or to our partners separate from those that we would carry if we were performing the contract on our own. Under accounting principles generally accepted in the United States, our share of losses associated with the contracts held by the joint ventures, if and when they occur, has always been reflected in our Consolidated Financial Statements.

On October 2, 2010 the Company adopted the FASB’s new accounting guidance relating to the consolidation of variable interest entities (“VIE”). This guidance replaces the quantitative-based assessment for determining which enterprise has a controlling interest in a VIE with an approach that is now primarily qualitative. The Company has reassessed its VIEs using the new guidance. The adoption of this new guidance did not have a material effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In evaluating the Company’s VIEs we perform a qualitative analysis to determine whether or not the Company has a “controlling financial interest” in the VIE. The Company is deemed to have a controlling financial interest in a VIE if it has (i) the power to direct the activities of the VIE that most significantly impact the VIEs economic performance; and (ii) the right to receive benefits, or obligation to absorb losses, that could potentially be significant to the VIE.

In making our qualitative analysis the Company assesses each VIE to determine those activities that most significantly impact the VIE’s economic performance and whether the Company, another entity, or multiple entities have the power to direct those activities.

If we determine that we have the power to direct the most significant activities of the VIE and to receive benefits or absorb losses that could potentially be significant to the VIE then we are the primary beneficiary of the VIE, and we consolidate the VIE. If we determine that we do not have the power to direct the most significant activities of the VIE or power is shared by two or more parties then we are not the primary beneficiary and we do not consolidate the VIE.

For the Company’s unconsolidated joint ventures, we use the equity method of accounting. The Company does not currently participate in any significant VIEs in which it has a controlling financial interest.

Page 12

JACOBS ENGINEERING GROUP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – UNAUDITED

April 1, 2011

(continued)

There were no changes in facts and circumstances in the quarter that caused the Company to reassess the method of accounting for our VIEs.

When we are directly responsible for subcontractor labor or third-party materials and equipment, we reflect the costs of such items in both revenues and costs. On those projects where the client elects to pay for such items directly and we have no associated responsibility for such items, these amounts are not reflected in either revenues or costs.

The following table sets forth pass-through costs included in revenues for the three and six months ended April 1, 2011 and April 2, 2010 (in thousands):


	For the Three Months Ended				For the Six Months Ended
	April 1, 2011		April 2, 2010		April 1, 2011		April 2, 2010
Pass-through costs included in revenues	$	540,960	$	721,682	$	1,075,848	$	1,448,948

Disclosures About Defined Pension Benefit Obligations

The following table presents the components of net periodic benefit cost recognized in earnings during each of the three and six month periods ended April 1, 2011 and April 2, 2010 (in thousands):


	For the Three Months Ended						For the Six Months Ended
Component:	April 1, 2011			April 2, 2010			April 1, 2011			April 2, 2010
Service cost	$	7,423		$	5,308		$	14,672		$	11,387
Interest cost		14,957			12,784			29,643			27,043
Expected return on plan assets		(14,499	)		(11,295	)		(28,753	)		(23,757	)
Amortization of previously unrecognized items		4,114			2,986			8,164			6,293

Net periodic benefit cost	$	11,995		$	9,783		$	23,726		$	20,966

The following table presents certain information regarding Company cash contributions to our pension plans for fiscal 2011 (in thousands):


Cash contributions made during the first six months of fiscal 2011	$	26,801
Cash contributions we expect to make during the remainder of fiscal 2011		18,822

Total	$	45,623

The change in pension liability included in the Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for the three and six months ended April 1, 2011 and April 2, 2010 relates primarily to the effects of exchange rate changes.

Earnings Per Share and Certain Related Information

The following table (i) reconciles the denominator used to compute basic earnings per share (“EPS”) to the denominator used to compute diluted EPS for the three and six months ended April 1, 2011 and April 2, 2010; (ii) provides information regarding the number of non-qualified stock options that were antidilutive and therefore disregarded in calculating the

Page 13

JACOBS ENGINEERING GROUP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – UNAUDITED

April 1, 2011

(continued)

weighted average number of shares outstanding used in computing diluted EPS; and (iii) provides the number of shares of common stock issued from the exercise of stock options and the release of restricted stock (in thousands):


	For the Three Months Ended				For the Six Months Ended
	April 1, 2011		April 2, 2010		April 1, 2011		April 2, 2010
Shares used to calculate EPS:
Weighted average shares outstanding (denominator used to compute basic EPS)		125,402		123,911		125,198		123,771
Effect of stock options and restricted stock		1,961		1,654		1,846		1,670

Denominator used to compute diluted EPS		127,363		125,565		127,044		125,441

Antidilutive stock options and restricted stock		2,229.5		2,887.7		3,036.1		2,887.7

Shares of common stock issued from the exercise of stock options and the release of restricted stock		722.8		426.1		1,071.7		697.7

Accounting for and Disclosure of Guarantees and Contingencies

Please refer to Note 10—Commitments and Contingencies, and Derivative Financial Instruments of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements beginning on page F-26 of our 2010 Form 10-K for a discussion of our various commitments and contingencies. In April 2011, the Company completed the purchase of the building subject to Lease 1 described under “Guarantees” in Note 10 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in its 2010 Form 10-K.

Please refer to Note 11—Contractual Guarantees, Litigation, Investigations, and Insurance of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements beginning on page F-27 of our 2010 Form 10-K for a discussion of the Company’s contractual guarantees and a description of the various types of litigation in which we’re involved.

Page 14

JACOBS ENGINEERING GROUP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Item 2.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

General

The purpose of this Management’s Discussion and Analysis (“MD&A”) is to provide a narrative analysis explaining the reasons for material changes in the Company’s (i) financial condition since the most recent fiscal year-end, and (ii) results of operations during the current fiscal period(s) as compared to the corresponding period(s) of the preceding fiscal year. In order to better understand such changes, readers of this MD&A should also read:

•

The discussion of the critical and significant accounting policies used by the Company in preparing its consolidated financial statements (the most current discussion of our critical accounting policies appears on pages 34 through 37 of our 2010 Annual Report on Form 10-K (the “2010 Form 10-K”), and the most current discussion of our significant accounting policies appears on pages F-8 through F-14 of our 2010 Form 10-K), as well as the discussion of new accounting standards included in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements of this Form 10-Q;

•

The Company’s fiscal 2010 audited consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in its 2010 Form 10-K (beginning on page F-1 thereto); and

•

Item 7—Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations included in our 2010 Form 10-K (beginning on page 34 thereto).

In addition to historical information, this MD&A may contain forward-looking statements that are not based on historical fact. When used herein, words such as “expects”, “anticipates”, “believes”, “seeks”, “estimates”, “plans”, “intends”, and similar words identify forward-looking statements. You should not place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements. Although such statements are based on management’s current estimates and expectations, and currently available competitive, financial, and economic data, forward-looking statements are inherently uncertain and involve risks and uncertainties that could cause our actual results to differ materially from what may be inferred from the forward-looking statements. Some of the factors that could cause or contribute to such differences are listed and discussed in Item 1A—Risk Factors, included in our 2010 Form 10-K (beginning on page 19 thereto). We undertake no obligation to release publicly any revisions or updates to any forward-looking statements. We encourage you to read carefully the risk factors described in other documents we file from time to time with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission.

Overview

On February 1, 2011, the Company acquired certain operations within the process and construction business of Aker Solutions ASA. The Company’s results of operations for the three and six months ended April 1, 2011 include two months of the acquired businesses (the “Aker Entities”). The Aker Entities contributed approximately $172.4 million of revenues, $29.5 million of selling, general and administrative expenses (which includes approximately $3.5 million of due diligence and integration costs), and net earnings of $5.3 million or $0.04 per diluted share for the second quarter of fiscal 2011.

Page 15

JACOBS ENGINEERING GROUP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Included in the Company’s results of operations for the six months ended April 2, 2010 is an after-tax charge of $5.8 million, or $0.04 per diluted share, related to the Company ceasing use of one of its offices located in Houston, Texas, and entering into a sublease for the entire property.

Results of Operations

Net earnings for the second quarter of fiscal 2011 ended April 1, 2011 totaled $80.3 million, or $0.63 per diluted share, compared to $77.5 million, of $0.62 per diluted share, for the second quarter of fiscal 2010.

For the six months ended April 1, 2011, net earnings totaled $146.1 million, or $1.15 per diluted share, compared to $149.9 million, or $1.20 per diluted share, for the six months ended April 2, 2010.

Total revenues for the quarter ended April 1, 2011 were $2.6 billion, substantially unchanged from the corresponding period last year. Total revenues for the six months ended April 1, 2011 were $4.9 billion, compared to $5.1 billion for the corresponding period last year.

The following table sets forth our revenues by the various types of services we provide for the three and six months ended April 1, 2011 and April 2, 2010 (in thousands):


	For the Three Months Ended				For the Six Months Ended
	April 1, 2011		April 2, 2010		April 1, 2011		April 2, 2010
Technical Professional Services Revenues:
Project Services	$	1,286,093	$	1,110,065	$	2,298,366	$	2,123,020
Process, Scientific, and Systems Consulting		205,121		234,494		397,661		441,763

Total Technical Professional Services Revenues		1,491,214		1,344,559		2,696,027		2,564,783

Field Services Revenues:
Construction		754,743		986,581		1,531,854		1,956,460
Operations and Maintenance (“O&M”)		312,059		255,834		686,310		543,516

Total Field Services Revenues		1,066,802		1,242,415		2,218,164		2,499,976

Total Revenues	$	2,558,016	$	2,586,974	$	4,914,191	$	5,064,759

Page 16

JACOBS ENGINEERING GROUP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

The following table sets forth our revenues by the industry groups and markets in which our clients operate for the three and six months ended April 1, 2011 and April 2, 2010 (in thousands):


	For the Three Months Ended				For the Six Months Ended
	April 1, 2011		April 2, 2010		April 1, 2011		April 2, 2010
National Government Programs	$	584,176	$	613,264	$	1,158,436	$	1,138,117
Refining - Downstream		495,502		776,944		1,102,909		1,551,961
Chemicals and Polymers		332,768		314,349		588,089		627,584
Infrastructure		354,748		240,119		648,224		456,525
Buildings		241,811		221,389		467,879		413,951
Oil & Gas - Upstream		164,597		123,739		316,289		245,682
Pharmaceuticals and Biotechnology		90,486		154,251		186,209		351,335
Industrial and Other		293,928		142,919		446,156		279,604

	$	2,558,016	$	2,586,974	$	4,914,191	$	5,064,759

For the three and six months ended April 1, 2011, Project Services revenues increased by 15.9% and 8.3%, respectively, compared to the corresponding periods last year. Most of these increases were due to revenues earned by the Aker Entities.

For the three and six months ended April 1, 2011, Construction services revenues decreased by 23.5% and 21.7%, respectively, compared to the corresponding periods last year. Contributing to the declines in Construction services revenues is the winding-down of one large project in the energy & refining-downstream market combined with a reduction in pass-through costs (discussed below).

For the three and six months ended April 1, 2011, revenues from O&M services increased 22.0% and 26.3%, respectively, as compared to the corresponding periods last year. These increases relate primarily to higher O&M activities on projects for the United States federal government (particularly as it relates to government test facilities) and for our clients operating in the Oil & Gas-Upstream and Chemicals and Polymers industries.

The Aker Entities contributed approximately $34.1 million of Field Service revenues for both the three and six months ended April 1, 2011.

For the three and six months ended April 1, 2011, revenues from clients operating in the Infrastructure market were 47.7% and 42.0% higher, respectively, as compared to the corresponding periods last year. Contributing to these increases were higher Project Services revenues for various transportation projects and revenues earned from the Aker Entities. For the three and six months ended April 1, 2011, revenues from clients operating in the Buildings market were 9.2% and 13.0% higher, respectively, as compared to the corresponding periods last year. Contributing to these increases was higher Project Services revenues on a number of buildings projects including those for several government agencies within the United States.

Revenues earned on projects classified as Industrial and Other for the three and six months ended April 1, 2011 increased significantly as compared to the corresponding periods last year. The Aker Entities contributed approximately $114.6 million of this category’s revenues in fiscal 2011 (specifically, for clients operating in the mining and metals industries). Also contributing to this increase are revenues earned from other mining and metals clients.

Direct costs of contracts for the three months ended April 1, 2011 decreased $55.0 million, or 2.5%, to $2.17 billion as compared to $2.22 billion for the corresponding period last year. Direct costs of contracts for the six months ended April 1, 2011 decreased $158.4 million, or 3.6%, to $4.19 billion as compared to $4.35 billion for the corresponding period last year. The level of direct costs of contracts may fluctuate between reporting periods due to a variety of

Page 17

JACOBS ENGINEERING GROUP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

factors including the amount of pass-through costs we incur during a period. On those projects where we are responsible for subcontract labor or third-party materials and equipment, we reflect the amounts of such items in both revenues and costs (and we refer to such items as “pass-through costs”). On other projects, where the client elects to pay for such items directly and we have no associated responsibility for such items, these amounts are not considered pass-through costs and are, therefore, not reflected in either revenues or costs. To the extent that we incur a significant amount of pass-through costs in a period, our direct cost of contracts are likely to increase as well.

For the three and six months ended April 1, 2011, pass-through costs decreased $180.7 million and $373.1 million, respectively, as compared to the corresponding periods last year. In general, pass-through costs are more significant on projects that have a higher content of field services activities. Pass-through costs are generally incurred at a specific point in the lifecycle of a project and are highly dependent on the needs of our individual clients and the nature of the clients’ projects. However, because we have hundreds of projects which start at various times within a fiscal year, the effect of pass-through costs on the level of direct costs of contracts can vary between fiscal years without there being a fundamental or significant change to the underlying business.

As a percentage of revenues, direct costs of contracts for the three and six months ended April 1, 2011 was 84.8% and 85.3%, respectively. This compares to 86.0% and 85.9%, respectively, for the three and six months ended April 2, 2010. The relationship between direct costs of contracts and revenues will fluctuate between reporting periods depending on a variety of factors including the mix of business during the reporting periods being compared as well as the level of margins earned from the various types of services provided. Generally speaking, the more procurement we do on behalf of our clients (i.e., where we purchase equipment and materials for use on projects, and/or procure subcontracts in connection with projects) and the more field services revenues we have relative to technical, professional services revenues, the higher the direct cost of contracts percentage will be. Because revenues from pass-through costs typically have lower margin rates associated with them, it is not unusual for us to experience an increase or decrease in such revenues without experiencing a corresponding increase or decrease in our gross margins and operating profit.

Selling, general and administrative (“SG&A”) expenses for the second quarter ended April 1, 2011 totaled $261.2 million compared to $241.2 million for the corresponding period last year. For the six months ended April 1, 2010, SG&A expenses totaled $488.6 million compared to $476.9 million for the corresponding period last year. Excluding the SG&A expenses for the six months ended April 1, 2011 relating to the Aker Entities and to the Company’s acquisition and integration activities, and excluding the effects of the Houston sublease from the SG&As expenses of the corresponding period last year, SG&A expenses for the current six-month period decreased approximately $17.3 million as compared to the corresponding period last year.

Interest expense for the three and six months ended April 1, 2011 increased $2.0 million and $2.2 million, respectively, as compared to the corresponding periods last year. The increase in interest expense was due primarily to the increased debt incurred in connection with the acquisition of the Aker Entities.

Backlog Information

We include in backlog the total dollar amount of revenues we expect to record in the future as a result of performing work under contracts that have been awarded to us. Because of the nature, size, expected duration, funding commitments, and the scope of services required by our contracts, the timing of when backlog will be recognized as revenues can vary greatly between individual contracts. Our policy with respect to O&M contracts, however, is to include

Page 18

JACOBS ENGINEERING GROUP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

in backlog the amount of revenues we expect to receive for one succeeding year, regardless of the remaining life of the contract. For national government programs (other than national government O&M contracts), our policy is to include in backlog the full contract award, whether funded or unfunded, and exclude option periods.

In accordance with industry practice, substantially all of our contracts are subject to cancellation or termination at the option of the client. In a situation where a client terminates a contract, we typically are entitled to receive payment for work performed up to the date of termination and, in certain instances, we may be entitled to allowable termination and cancellation costs. While management uses all information available to it to determine backlog, our backlog at any given time is subject to changes in the scope of services to be provided as well as increases or decreases in costs relating to the contracts included therein.

Because certain contracts (for example, contracts relating to large engineering, procurement, and construction projects as well as national government programs) can cause large increases to backlog in the fiscal period in which we recognize the award, and because many of our contracts require us to provide services that span over a number of fiscal quarters (and sometimes over fiscal years), we evaluate our backlog on a year-over-year basis, rather than on a sequential, quarter-over-quarter basis.

The following table summarizes our backlog at April 1, 2011 and April 2, 2010 (in millions):


	2011		2010
Technical professional services	$	8,669.4	$	8,299.3
Field services		5,336.5		6,354.3

Total	$	14,005.9	$	14,653.6

Our backlog decreased $647.7 million, or 4.4%, to $14.0 billion at April 1, 2011 from $14.7 billion at April 2, 2010. Backlog at April 1, 2011 includes approximately $634.3 million of backlog relating to the Aker Entities. Also included in backlog at April 1, 2011 are new awards from clients operating in the Oil & Gas-Upstream, basic resources, and the semiconductor industries.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

At April 1, 2011, our principal sources of liquidity consisted of $747.9 million of cash and cash equivalents, and $251.0 million of available borrowing capacity under our $290.0 million, long-term, unsecured revolving credit facility. We finance as much of our operations and growth as possible through cash generated by our operations.

In addition to our revolving credit facility, we have a short-term credit facility which we entered into in fiscal 2009 in connection with our acquisition of a one-third interest in AWE Management Ltd of which $54.4 million was outstanding at April 1, 2011. In connection with the acquisition of the Aker Entities described above, we entered into several new bilateral credit facilities with major U.S. and European banks. Approximately $369.1 million was outstanding under these facilities at April 1, 2011.

During the first six months of fiscal 2011, our cash and cash equivalents decreased by $190.9 million to $747.9 million at April 1, 2011. This compares to a net decrease in cash and cash equivalents of $194.6 million, to $839.1 million, during the corresponding period last year. During the six months ended April 1, 2011, we used $632.5 million of cash and cash equivalents for investing activities. This cash outflow was offset in part by net cash inflows of $77.0 million from operating activities and $364.5 million from financing activities.

Page 19

JACOBS ENGINEERING GROUP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Our operations provided net cash of $77.0 million during the six months ended April 1, 2011. This compares to net cash inflows of $117.2 million for the corresponding period last year. The $40.1 million decrease in cash provided by operations for the six months ended April 1, 2011 as compared to the corresponding period last year was due primarily to a $37.3 million decrease relating to changes in our working capital accounts (discussed below).

With respect to the $37.3 million decrease in cash flows relating to changes in our working capital accounts, there was no unusual activity occurring in these accounts during the six months ended April 1, 2011.

Because such a high percentage of our revenues are earned on cost-plus type contracts, and due to the significance of revenues relating to pass-through costs, most of the costs we incur are included in invoices we send to clients. Although we continually monitor our accounts receivable, we manage the operating cash flows of the Company by managing the working capital accounts in total, rather than by the individual elements. The primary elements of the Company’s working capital accounts are accounts receivable, accounts payable, and billings in excess of cost. Accounts payable consists of obligations to third parties relating primarily to costs incurred for projects which are generally billable to clients. Accounts receivable consist of billings to our clients — a substantial portion of which is for project-related costs. Billings in excess of cost consist of billings to and payments from our clients for costs yet to be incurred.

This relationship between revenues and costs, and between receivables and payables is unique for our industry, and facilitates review at the total working capital level. The $37.3 million decrease in cash flows relating to changes in our working capital accounts was due simply to the timing of cash receipts and payments within our working capital accounts and is not indicative of any known trend or fundamental change to the underlying business.

We used $632.5 million of cash and cash equivalents for investing activities during the six months ended April 1, 2011 as compared to $406.1 million during the corresponding period last year. The $226.4 million increase in cash used for investing activities for the six months ended April 1, 2011 as compared to the corresponding period last year was due to increased business acquisition activity.

During the six months ended April 1, 2011, we acquired certain operations within the process and construction business of Aker Solutions ASA. We also acquired TechTeam Government Solutions, Inc., Sula Systems Ltd., Damon S. Williams Associates, L.L.C., and two other smaller niche engineering and design firms.

Our financing activities resulted in net cash inflows of $364.5 million during the six months ended April 1, 2011. This compares to net cash inflows of $92.8 million during the corresponding period last year. The $271.7 million net increase in cash flows from financing activities during the six months ended April 1, 2011 as compared to the corresponding period last year was due primarily to the financing of the acquisition of the Aker Entities.

We believe we have adequate liquidity and capital resources to fund our operations, support our acquisition strategy, and service our debt for the next twelve months. We had $747.9 million in cash and cash equivalents at April 1, 2011, compared to $938.8 million at October 1, 2010. Our consolidated working capital position at April 1, 2011 was $1.4 billion, a decrease of $80.4 million from October 1, 2010. We have a long-term, unsecured, revolving credit facility providing up to $290.0 million of debt capacity, under which approximately $39.0 million was utilized at April 1, 2011 in the form of direct borrowings and letters of credit. We believe that the capacity, terms and conditions of our long-term revolving credit facility, combined with other committed and uncommitted facilities we have in place, are adequate for our working capital and general business requirements.

Page 20

JACOBS ENGINEERING GROUP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Item 3.

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.

We do not enter into derivative financial instruments for trading, speculation or other purposes that would expose us to market risk. As more fully discussed below and in Item 1A—Risk Factors of our 2010 Form 10-K (beginning on page 19 thereto), our results of operations are exposed to risks associated with fluctuations in interest rates and currency exchange rates.

Interest Rate Risk

Our primary source for long-term credit is a $290.0 million, long-term, unsecured revolving credit facility. The total amount outstanding under this facility in the form of direct borrowings at April 1, 2011 was $10.2 million. This agreement expires in May 2012, and provides for both fixed-rate and variable-rate borrowings. Our objectives in managing our interest rate risk are to limit the impact of interest rate changes on earnings and cash flows, and to lower our overall borrowing costs. To achieve these objectives, we continuously monitor changes in interest rates, and use cash provided from operations to re-pay our borrowings as quickly as possible. Furthermore, the Company can use a combination of both fixed rate and variable rate debt to manage our exposure to interest rate risk.

Foreign Currency Risk

In situations where our operations incur contract costs in currencies other than their functional currency, we attempt to have a portion of the related contract revenues denominated in the same currencies as the costs. In those situations where revenues and costs are transacted in different currencies, we sometimes enter into foreign exchange contracts in order to limit our exposure to fluctuating foreign currencies. The Company does not currently have exchange rate sensitive instruments that would have a material effect on our consolidated financial statements or results of operations.

Item 4.

Controls and Procedures.

The Company’s management, with the participation of its Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, evaluated the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures as defined by Rule 13a-15(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”) as of April 1, 2011, the end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (the “Evaluation Date”). Based on that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of the Evaluation Date.

There were no changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting during the quarter ended April 1, 2011 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

Page 21

JACOBS ENGINEERING GROUP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

PART II – OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1.

Legal Proceedings.

In the normal course of business, we are subject to certain contractual guarantees and litigation. The guarantees to which we are a party generally relate to project schedules and plant performance. Most of the litigation in which we are involved has us as a defendant in workers’ compensation; personal injury; environmental; employment/labor; professional liability; and other similar lawsuits.

We maintain insurance coverage for various aspects of our business and operations. We have elected, however, to retain a portion of losses that occur through the use of various deductibles, limits, and retentions under our insurance programs. This situation may subject us to some future liability for which we are only partially insured, or completely uninsured. We intend to mitigate any such future liability by continuing to exercise prudent business judgment in negotiating the terms and conditions of our contracts.

Additionally, as a contractor providing services to the United States federal government and several of its agencies, we are subject to many levels of audits, investigations, and claims by, or on behalf of, the U.S. federal government with respect to our contract performance, pricing, costs, cost allocations, and procurement practices. Furthermore, our income, franchise, and similar tax returns and filings are also subject to audit and investigation by the Internal Revenue Service, most states within the United States as well as by various government agencies representing jurisdictions outside the United States.

We record in our Consolidated Balance Sheets amounts representing our estimated liability relating to such claims, guarantees, litigation, and audits and investigations. We perform an analysis to determine the level of reserves to establish for insurance-related claims that are known and have been asserted against us, and for insurance-related claims that are believed to have been incurred based on actuarial analysis, but have not yet been reported to our claims administrators as of the respective balance sheet dates. We include any adjustments to such insurance reserves in our consolidated results of operations.

Management believes, after consultation with counsel, that such guarantees, litigation, United States government contract-related audits, investigations and claims, and income tax audits and investigations should not have any material adverse effect on our consolidated financial statements.

On August 1, 2007 the I-35W bridge in Minneapolis, Minnesota suffered a tragic collapse. The bridge was designed and built in the early 1960’s. Sverdrup & Parcel and Associates, Inc. (“Sverdrup & Parcel”) provided design services to the Minnesota Department of Transportation (“MnDOT”) on the bridge. Sverdrup & Parcel was a predecessor company to Sverdrup Corporation, a company acquired by Jacobs in 1999. Several lawsuits have been filed against a consultant who had been providing engineering analyses of the bridge prior to its collapse, and against a contractor who was providing maintenance and construction work on the bridge at the time of its collapse. No lawsuits have been filed directly against the Company by any of the primary plaintiffs. The consultant and the contractor have filed suit against the Company claiming that the Company was liable for negligent design services by Sverdrup & Parcel, and against MnDOT claiming that MnDOT had an obligation to inspect, maintain and repair the bridge and that it failed to do so. MnDOT filed a suit against the Company, the consultant, and the contractor claiming that it is entitled to be indemnified for amounts that it paid out under its Victims Compensation Fund, and demanding that the Company share in the $37 million that MnDOT has paid to settle with the primary plaintiffs.

Page 22

JACOBS ENGINEERING GROUP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

The contractor’s suit against the Company has been dismissed without any compensation being paid by the Company. We understand that the consultant has settled all of the plaintiffs’ and MnDOT’s claims against it. We understand that the contractor has settled all of the plaintiffs’ and MnDOT’s claims against it. The consultant’s suit against the Company demands the Company share in the $52 million that the consultant has paid to settle with the primary plaintiffs. The Company’s motions to dismiss the claims against it by the consultant and MnDOT based on the State Statute of Repose and other basis were denied by the trial court. The Company filed an appeal. The appellate court reversed the trial court and granted the Company’s motion to dismiss the consultant’s claim. The consultant petitioned the Minnesota Supreme Court to grant review. The appellate court upheld the trial court’s decision denying the Company’s motion to dismiss MnDOT’s claim. The Company petitioned the Minnesota Supreme Court to grant review. The Minnesota Supreme court granted the petition for review in both matters. Oral argument was held on April 11, 2011. The Company does not expect this matter to have any material adverse effect on its consolidated financial statements.

Item 1A.

Risk Factors.

Please refer to Item 1A—Risk Factors on pages 19 through 29 of our 2010 Form 10-K, which is incorporated herein by reference. There have been no material changes from those risk factors previously disclosed in our 2010 Form 10-K.

Page 23

JACOBS ENGINEERING GROUP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Item 6.

Exhibits

(a)

Exhibits



10.1 –		Term Loan Agreement dated January 27, 2011 between Jacobs Engineering U.K. Limited and Royal Bank of Scotland Finance (Ireland).

10.2 –		Senior Term Loan Facility dated January 26, 2011 between Jacobs Nederland B.V. and BNP Paribas.

10.3 –		Senior Term Loan Facility dated January 26, 2011 between Jacobs Engineering U.K. Limited and Bank of America, N.A., London Branch.

10.4 –		Senior Term Loan Facility dated January 26, 2011 between Jacobs Australia Pty Limited Limited and Bank of America, N.A., Australian Branch.

10.5 –		Form of Guaranty among certain subsidiaries of Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. and Royal Bank of Scotland Finance (Ireland), BNP Paribas, Bank of America, N.A., London Branch, and Bank of America, N.A., Australian Branch.

10.6 –#		Employment Agreement dated December 23, 2010 between Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. and Gary Mandel.

31.1 –		Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

31.2 –		Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

32.1 –		Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

32.2 –		Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

101.INS		XBRL Instance Document

101.SCH		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document

101.CAL		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document

101.DEF		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document

101.LAB		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document

101.PRE		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document

*	Certain appendices have been omitted pursuant to Item 601(b)(2) of Regulation S-K. The Company will furnish copies of any of the omitted appendices to the SEC upon request.

#	Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement.

Page 24

JACOBS ENGINEERING GROUP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

JACOBS ENGINEERING GROUP INC.



By:		/s/ John W. Prosser, Jr.

		John W. Prosser, Jr.
		Executive Vice President
		Finance and Administration
		and Treasurer
		(Principal Financial Officer)

Date: April 29, 2011

Page 25

Large accelerated filer

Accelerated filer

Non-accelerated filer

Smaller reporting company