Form 10-Q
Table of Contents

 

 

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

 

 

FORM 10-Q

 

 

 

x

QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended: December 25, 2010

OR

 

¨

TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from              to             

Commission file number 0-19725

 

 

PERRIGO COMPANY

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

 

 

 

Michigan   38-2799573

(State or other jurisdiction of

incorporation or organization)

 

(I.R.S. Employer

Identification No.)

515 Eastern Avenue

Allegan, Michigan

  49010
(Address of principal executive offices)   (Zip Code)

(269) 673-8451

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Not Applicable

(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)

 

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months, and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    YES  x    NO   ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).    YES  x    NO  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer”, and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

 

Large accelerated filer

 

x

  

Accelerated filer

 

¨

Non-accelerated filer

 

¨  (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

  

Smaller reporting company

 

¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).    ¨  YES    x  NO

As of January 28, 2011, the registrant had 92,337,152 outstanding shares of common stock.

 

 

 


Table of Contents

PERRIGO COMPANY

FORM 10-Q

INDEX

 

     PAGE
NUMBER
 

Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements

     1   

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

  

Item 1. Financial Statements (Unaudited)

  

Condensed consolidated statements of income — For the quarters and year-to-date periods ended December 25, 2010 and December  26, 2009

     2   

Condensed consolidated balance sheets — December 25, 2010, June 26, 2010, and December 26, 2009

     3   

Condensed consolidated statements of cash flows — For the year-to-date periods ended December 25, 2010 and December 26, 2009

     4   

Notes to condensed consolidated financial statements

     5   

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

     37   

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

     52   

Item 4. Controls and Procedures

     53   

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

  

Item 1. Legal Proceedings

     54   

Item 1A. Risk Factors

     54   

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

     55   

Item 6. Exhibits

     56   

SIGNATURES

     57   

EXHIBIT INDEX

     58   


Table of Contents

Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements

Certain statements in this report are “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and are subject to the safe harbor created thereby. These statements relate to future events or the Company’s future financial performance and involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause the actual results, levels of activity, performance or achievements of the Company or its industry to be materially different from those expressed or implied by any forward-looking statements. In particular, statements about the Company’s expectations, beliefs, plans, objectives, assumptions, future events or future performance contained in this report, including certain statements contained in “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” are forward-looking statements. In some cases, forward-looking statements can be identified by terminology such as “may,” “will,” “could,” “would,” “should,” “expect,” “plan,” “anticipate,” “intend,” “believe,” “estimate,” “predict,” “potential” or the negative of those terms or other comparable terminology. Please see Item 1A of the Company’s Form 10-K for the year ended June 26, 2010 and Part II, Item 1A of this Form 10-Q for a discussion of certain important risk factors that relate to forward-looking statements contained in this report. The Company has based these forward-looking statements on its current expectations, assumptions, estimates and projections. While the Company believes these expectations, assumptions, estimates and projections are reasonable, such forward-looking statements are only predictions and involve known and unknown risks and uncertainties, many of which are beyond the Company’s control. These and other important factors may cause actual results, performance or achievements to differ materially from those expressed or implied by these forward-looking statements. The forward-looking statements in this report are made only as of the date hereof, and unless otherwise required by applicable securities laws, the Company disclaims any intention or obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.

 

-1-


Table of Contents
Item 1. Financial Statements (Unaudited)

PERRIGO COMPANY

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME

(in thousands, except per share amounts)

(unaudited)

 

     Second Quarter     Year-to-Date  
     2011     2010
As Adjusted
(Note 1)
    2011     2010
As Adjusted
(Note 1)
 

Net sales

   $ 717,515      $ 582,425      $ 1,358,837      $ 1,110,758   

Cost of sales

     468,015        384,800        895,383        749,921   
                                

Gross profit

     249,500        197,625        463,454        360,837   
                                

Operating expenses

        

Distribution

     8,864        7,084        17,197        13,555   

Research and development

     24,604        20,686        42,331        39,438   

Selling and administration

     83,793        71,822        159,920        123,682   
                                

Subtotal

     117,261        99,592        219,448        176,675   
                                

Write-off of in-process research and development

     —          —          —          14,000   
                                

Total

     117,261        99,592        219,448        190,675   
                                

Operating income

     132,239        98,033        244,006        170,162   

Interest, net

     10,716        5,447        20,803        11,942   

Other income, net

     (633     (1,023     (1,192     (319
                                

Income from continuing operations before income taxes

     122,156        93,609        224,395        158,539   

Income tax expense

     32,377        30,818        60,938        44,648   
                                

Income from continuing operations

     89,779        62,791        163,457        113,891   

Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax

     388        (1,978     1,085        (1,217
                                

Net income

   $ 90,167      $ 60,813      $ 164,542      $ 112,674   
                                

Earnings (loss) per share (1)

        

Basic

        

Continuing operations

   $ 0.97      $ 0.69      $ 1.78      $ 1.24   

Discontinued operations

     0.00        (0.02     0.01        (0.01
                                

Basic earnings per share

   $ 0.98      $ 0.66      $ 1.79      $ 1.23   

Diluted

        

Continuing operations

   $ 0.96      $ 0.68      $ 1.75      $ 1.22   

Discontinued operations

     0.00        (0.02     0.01        (0.01
                                

Diluted earnings per share

   $ 0.97      $ 0.65      $ 1.76      $ 1.21   

Weighted average shares outstanding

        

Basic

     92,232        91,634        92,031        91,646   

Diluted

     93,363        92,999        93,280        93,018   

Dividends declared per share

   $ 0.0700      $ 0.0625      $ 0.1325      $ 0.1175   

 

(1)

The sum of individual per share amounts may not equal due to rounding.

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

 

-2-


Table of Contents

PERRIGO COMPANY

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(in thousands)

(unaudited)

 

     December 25, 2010     June 26, 2010
As Adjusted
(Note 1)
    December 26, 2009
As Adjusted
(Note 1)
 

Assets

      

Current assets

      

Cash and cash equivalents

   $ 134,779      $ 109,765      $ 282,440   

Restricted cash

     —          400,000        —     

Investment securities

     —          559        559   

Accounts receivable, net

     465,257        357,185        340,465   

Inventories

     483,787        452,980        411,229   

Current deferred income taxes

     28,979        26,135        25,516   

Income taxes refundable

     943        14,439        5,714   

Prepaid expenses and other current assets

     43,253        28,403        23,830   

Current assets of discontinued operations

     6,542        7,375        70,345   
                        

Total current assets

     1,163,540        1,396,841        1,160,098   

Property and equipment

     929,232        885,169        797,906   

Less accumulated depreciation

     (469,068     (436,586     (435,875
                        
     460,164        448,583        362,031   

Restricted cash

     —          —          400,000   

Goodwill and other indefinite-lived intangible assets

     639,581        624,663        274,107   

Other intangible assets, net

     578,766        587,000        209,017   

Non-current deferred income taxes

     13,314        —          —     

Other non-current assets

     79,655        52,677        53,862   
                        
   $ 2,935,020      $ 3,109,764      $ 2,459,115   
                        

Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity

      

Current liabilities

      

Accounts payable

   $ 289,844      $ 267,311      $ 252,523   

Short-term debt

     971        9,000        —     

Payroll and related taxes

     74,348        79,219        80,368   

Accrued customer programs

     90,366        59,898        63,927   

Accrued liabilities

     70,424        90,046        55,088   

Accrued income taxes

     32,992        9,125        11,742   

Current portion of long-term debt

     15,000        400,000        —     

Current liabilities of discontinued operations

     14,244        5,370        22,205   
                        

Total current liabilities

     588,189        919,969        485,853   

Non-current liabilities

      

Long-term debt, less current portion

     875,000        935,000        825,000   

Non-current deferred income taxes

     16,652        54,064        53,323   

Other non-current liabilities

     147,139        106,791        106,227   
                        

Total non-current liabilities

     1,038,791        1,095,855        984,550   

Shareholders’ equity

      

Controlling interest shareholders’ equity:

      

Preferred stock, without par value, 10,000 shares authorized

     —          —          —     

Common stock, without par value, 200,000 shares authorized

     440,208        428,457        404,880   

Accumulated other comprehensive income

     93,219        43,200        61,722   

Retained earnings

     772,713        620,439        520,803   
                        
     1,306,140        1,092,096        987,405   

Noncontrolling interest

     1,900        1,844        1,307   
                        

Total shareholders’ equity

     1,308,040        1,093,940        988,712   
                        
   $ 2,935,020      $ 3,109,764      $ 2,459,115   
                        

Supplemental Disclosures of Balance Sheet Information

      

Related to Continuing Operations

      

Allowance for doubtful accounts

   $ 8,896      $ 8,015      $ 9,408   

Working capital

   $ 583,053      $ 474,867      $ 626,105   

Preferred stock, shares issued and outstanding

     —          —          —     

Common stock, shares issued and outstanding

     92,297        91,694        91,087   

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

 

-3-


Table of Contents

PERRIGO COMPANY

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(in thousands)

(unaudited)

 

     Year-To-Date  
     2011     2010
As Adjusted
(Note 1)
 

Cash Flows From (For) Operating Activities

    

Net income

   $ 164,542      $ 112,674   

Adjustments to derive cash flows

    

Write-off of in-process research and development

     —          14,000   

Depreciation and amortization

     50,370        34,241   

Share-based compensation

     7,212        7,695   

Income tax benefit from exercise of stock options

     2,123        (145

Excess tax benefit of stock transactions

     (9,607     (4,351

Deferred income taxes

     (59,379     (14,489
                

Sub-total

     155,261        149,625   
                

Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of asset and business acquisitions

    

Accounts receivable

     (103,947     (25,179

Inventories

     (24,151     (22,682

Income taxes refundable

     13,629        1,775   

Accounts payable

     19,006        (9,067

Payroll and related taxes

     (6,100     28,956   

Accrued customer programs

     30,495        9,354   

Accrued liabilities

     (14,010     (3,623

Accrued income taxes

     37,596        18,558   

Other

     14,960        8,369   
                

Sub-total

     (32,522     6,461   
                

Net cash from operating activities

     122,739        156,086   
                

Cash Flows (For) From Investing Activities

    

Proceeds from sales of securities

     560        —     

Acquisitions of businesses, net of cash acquired

     1,998        (10,059

Acquired research and development

     —          (14,000

Acquisitions of assets

     (4,000     (10,262

Additions to property and equipment

     (30,555     (23,260
                

Net cash for investing activities

     (31,997     (57,581
                

Cash Flows (For) From Financing Activities

    

Repayments of short-term debt, net

     (8,029     —     

Borrowings of long-term debt

     150,000        —     

Repayments of long-term debt

     (195,000     (67,771

Deferred financing fees

     (3,703     —     

Excess tax benefit of stock transactions

     9,607        4,351   

Issuance of common stock

     5,267        11,249   

Repurchase of common stock

     (8,214     (70,804

Cash dividends

     (12,268     (10,838
                

Net cash for financing activities

     (62,340     (133,813
                

Effect of exchange rate changes on cash

     (3,388     111   
                

Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents

     25,014        (35,197

Cash and cash equivalents of continuing operations, beginning of period

     109,765        317,638   

Cash balance of discontinued operations, beginning of period

     —          4   
                

Cash and cash equivalents, end of period

     134,779        282,445   

Less cash balance of discontinued operations, end of period

     —          (5
                

Cash and cash equivalents of continuing operations, end of period

   $ 134,779      $ 282,440   
                

Supplemental Disclosures of Cash Flow Information

    

Cash paid/received during the period for:

    

Interest paid

   $ 25,298      $ 21,846   

Interest received

   $ 2,266      $ 10,663   

Income taxes paid

   $ 55,264      $ 28,920   

Income taxes refunded

   $ 1,303      $ 940   

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

 

-4-


Table of Contents

PERRIGO COMPANY

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

December 25, 2010

(in thousands, except per share amounts)

NOTE 1 – SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND CHANGE IN ACCOUNTING PRINCIPLES

The Company

Perrigo Company (the “Company”) is a leading global healthcare supplier that develops, manufactures and distributes over-the-counter (OTC) and generic prescription (Rx) pharmaceuticals, nutritional products, infant formulas, active pharmaceutical ingredients (API) and pharmaceutical and medical diagnostic products. The Company is the world’s largest store brand manufacturer of OTC pharmaceutical products and infant formulas. The Company’s primary markets and locations of manufacturing and logistics operations are the United States, Israel, Mexico, the United Kingdom and Australia.

Basis of Presentation

The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) for interim financial information and with the instructions to Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by U.S. GAAP for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals and other adjustments) considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included.

The Company has four reportable segments, aligned primarily by type of product: Consumer Healthcare, Nutritionals, Rx Pharmaceuticals and API, along with an Other category. On April 30, 2010, the Company acquired 100% of the shares of PBM Holdings, Inc. (PBM), the leading manufacturer and distributor of store brand infant formulas, pediatric nutritionals and baby foods sold by leading retailers in the mass, club, grocery and drug channels in the U.S., Canada, Mexico and China. Following the acquisition of PBM, the Company now participates in new nutritional product lines. As a result, in the first quarter of fiscal 2011, the Company realigned and expanded its operating segments to include a Nutritionals segment, representing infant formulas and other nutritional products. Accounting Standard Codification (ASC) 280-10-50 (ASC 280-10-50) defines an operating segment as a component of a public entity that earns revenue and incurs expenses, has discrete financial information available and is reviewed regularly by the chief decision maker for purposes of allocating resources and assessing performance. Each of the segments meets the requirements of an operating segment. The Consumer Healthcare, Nutritionals, Rx Pharmaceuticals and API operating segments are also considered to be reportable segments by management. This segment structure is consistent with the way management makes operating decisions, allocates resources and manages the growth and profitability of the Company’s business. As a result of the change in segment reporting, all historical segment information has been reclassified to conform to the new presentation.

In March 2009, the Company committed to a plan to sell its Israel Consumer Products business. The financial results of this business have been classified as discontinued operations in the condensed consolidated financial statements for all periods presented. The sale was completed in the third quarter of fiscal 2010 resulting in a pre-tax gain on the sale of $750. See Note 3 for additional information regarding discontinued operations. Unless otherwise noted, amounts and disclosures throughout the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements relate to the Company’s continuing operations.

Principles of Consolidation

The condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and all majority owned subsidiaries. All material intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated in consolidation. Prior to June 27, 2010, the Company’s consolidated results of operations and financial position included the financial results of its U.K., Mexico, Germany and Israel subsidiaries on a twelve-month period ending in May, resulting in a one-month reporting lag when compared to the remainder of the Company.

 

-5-


Table of Contents

Starting June 27, 2010, the reporting year-end of these foreign operations was changed from May to June. The previously existing one-month reporting lag was eliminated as it was no longer required to achieve a timely consolidation due to the Company’s investments in technology, ERP systems and personnel to enhance its financial statement close process. The Company believes this change is preferable because the financial information of all operating units is now reported based on the same period-end, which improves overall financial reporting to investors by providing the most current information available. In accordance with ASC 850-10-50-2, “A Change in the Difference Between Parent and Subsidiary Fiscal Year-Ends,” the elimination of this previously existing reporting lag is considered a voluntary change in accounting principle in accordance with ASC 250-10-50 “Change in Accounting Principle.” Voluntary changes in accounting principles are to be reported through retrospective application of the new principle to all prior financial statement periods presented. Accordingly, the Company’s financial statements for periods prior to fiscal 2011 have been adjusted to reflect the period-specific effects of applying this accounting principle. This change resulted in a cumulative effect of an accounting change of $118, net of income tax effect, to retained earnings as of June 28, 2009. The impact of this change in accounting principle to eliminate the one-month lag for foreign subsidiaries is summarized below for the Company’s condensed consolidated statements of income for the three and six months ended December 26, 2009, the condensed consolidated balance sheets as of June 26, 2010 and December 26, 2009 and the condensed consolidated statement of cash flows for the six months ended December 26, 2009.

 

-6-


Table of Contents

PERRIGO COMPANY

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME

(in thousands, except per share amounts)

(unaudited)

 

     Three Months Ended December 26, 2009  
     As Reported     Adjustments     After Voluntary
Change in
Accounting
Principle
 

Net sales

   $ 583,168      $ (743   $ 582,425   

Cost of sales

     386,223        (1,423     384,800   
                        

Gross profit

     196,945        680        197,625   
                        

Operating expenses

      

Distribution

     7,012        72        7,084   

Research and development

     20,735        (49     20,686   

Selling and administration

     70,730        1,092        71,822   
                        

Subtotal

     98,477        1,115        99,592   
                        

Write-off of in-process research and development

     14,000        (14,000     —     
                        

Total

     112,477        (12,885     99,592   
                        

Operating income

     84,468        13,565        98,033   

Interest, net

     5,551        (104     5,447   

Other income, net

     (1,247     224        (1,023
                        

Income from continuing operations before income taxes

     80,164        13,445        93,609   

Income tax expense

     26,928        3,890        30,818   
                        

Income from continuing operations

     53,236        9,555        62,791   

Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax

     (2,342     364        (1,978
                        

Net income

   $ 50,894      $ 9,919      $ 60,813   
                        

Earnings (loss) per share (1)

      

Basic

      

Continuing operations

   $ 0.58      $ 0.10      $ 0.69   

Discontinued operations

     (0.03     0.00        (0.02
                        

Basic earnings per share

   $ 0.56      $ 0.11      $ 0.66   

Diluted

      

Continuing operations

   $ 0.57      $ 0.10      $ 0.68   

Discontinued operations

     (0.03     0.00        (0.02
                        

Diluted earnings per share

   $ 0.55      $ 0.11      $ 0.65   

 

(1)

The sum of individual per share amounts may not equal due to rounding.

 

-7-


Table of Contents

PERRIGO COMPANY

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME

(in thousands, except per share amounts)

(unaudited)

 

     Six Months Ended December 26, 2009  
     As Reported     Adjustments     After Voluntary
Change in
Accounting
Principle
 

Net sales

   $ 1,111,169      $ (411   $ 1,110,758   

Cost of sales

     750,230        (309     749,921   
                        

Gross profit

     360,939        (102     360,837   
                        

Operating expenses

      

Distribution

     13,533        22        13,555   

Research and development

     39,232        206        39,438   

Selling and administration

     123,137        545        123,682   
                        

Subtotal

     175,902        773        176,675   
                        

Write-off of in-process research and development

     14,000        —          14,000   
                        

Total

     189,902        773        190,675   
                        

Operating income

     171,037        (875     170,162   

Interest, net

     12,214        (272     11,942   

Other income, net

     (230     (89     (319
                        

Income from continuing operations before income taxes

     159,053        (514     158,539   

Income tax expense

     44,792        (144     44,648   
                        

Income from continuing operations

     114,261        (370     113,891   

Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax

     (2,069     852        (1,217
                        

Net income

   $ 112,192      $ 482      $ 112,674   
                        

Earnings (loss) per share (1)

      

Basic

      

Continuing operations

   $ 1.25      $ (0.00   $ 1.24   

Discontinued operations

     (0.02     0.01        (0.01
                        

Basic earnings per share

   $ 1.22      $ 0.01      $ 1.23   

Diluted

      

Continuing operations

   $ 1.23      $ (0.00   $ 1.22   

Discontinued operations

     (0.02     0.01        (0.01
                        

Diluted earnings per share

   $ 1.21      $ 0.01      $ 1.21   

 

(1)

The sum of individual per share amounts may not equal due to rounding.

 

-8-


Table of Contents

PERRIGO COMPANY

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(in thousands)

(unaudited)

 

June 26, 2010    As Reported     Adjustments     After Voluntary
Change in
Accounting
Principle
 

Assets

      

Current assets

      

Cash and cash equivalents

   $ 97,568      $ 12,197      $ 109,765   

Restricted cash

     400,000        —          400,000   

Investment securities

     557        2        559   

Accounts receivable, net

     358,500        (1,315     357,185   

Inventories

     448,871        4,109        452,980   

Current deferred income taxes

     26,648        (513     26,135   

Income taxes refundable

     13,864        575        14,439   

Prepaid expenses and other current assets

     28,071        332        28,403   

Current assets of discontinued operations

     7,214        161        7,375   
                        

Total current assets

     1,381,293        15,548        1,396,841   

Property and equipment

     885,953        (784     885,169   

Less accumulated depreciation

     (437,037     451        (436,586
                        
     448,916        (333     448,583   

Goodwill and other indefinite-lived intangible assets

     622,745        1,918        624,663   

Other intangible assets, net

     587,094        (94     587,000   

Other non-current assets

     52,688        (11     52,677   
                        
   $ 3,092,736      $ 17,028      $ 3,109,764   
                        

Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity

      

Current liabilities

      

Accounts payable

   $ 258,493      $ 8,818      $ 267,311   

Short-term debt

     9,000        —          9,000   

Payroll and related taxes

     82,088        (2,869     79,219   

Accrued customer programs

     59,898        —          59,898   

Accrued liabilities

     88,750        1,296        90,046   

Accrued income taxes

     3,048        6,077        9,125   

Current portion of long-term debt

     400,000        —          400,000   

Current liabilities of discontinued operations

     5,428        (58     5,370   
                        

Total current liabilities

     906,705        13,264        919,969   

Non-current liabilities

      

Long-term debt, less current portion

     935,000        —          935,000   

Non-current deferred income taxes

     55,333        (1,269     54,064   

Other non-current liabilities

     107,043        (252     106,791   
                        

Total non-current liabilities

     1,097,376        (1,521     1,095,855   

Shareholders’ equity

      

Controlling interest shareholders’ equity:

      

Preferred stock, without par value, 10,000 shares authorized

     —          —          —     

Common stock, without par value, 200,000 shares authorized

     428,457        —          428,457   

Accumulated other comprehensive income

     39,048        4,152        43,200   

Retained earnings

     619,303        1,136        620,439   
                        
     1,086,808        5,288        1,092,096   

Noncontrolling interest

     1,847        (3     1,844   
                        

Total shareholders’ equity

     1,088,655        5,285        1,093,940   
                        
   $ 3,092,736      $ 17,028      $ 3,109,764   
                        

 

-9-


Table of Contents

PERRIGO COMPANY

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(in thousands)

(unaudited)

 

December 26, 2009    As Reported     Adjustments     After Voluntary
Change in
Accounting
Principle
 

Assets

      

Current assets

      

Cash and cash equivalents

   $ 303,482      $ (21,042   $ 282,440   

Investment securities

     562        (3     559   

Accounts receivable, net

     345,941        (5,476     340,465   

Inventories

     416,475        (5,246     411,229   

Current deferred income taxes

     24,576        940        25,516   

Income taxes refundable

     6,388        (674     5,714   

Prepaid expenses and other current assets

     23,529        301        23,830   

Current assets of discontinued operations

     70,450        (105     70,345   
                        

Total current assets

     1,191,403        (31,305     1,160,098   

Property and equipment

     798,819        (913     797,906   

Less accumulated depreciation

     (435,911     36        (435,875
                        
     362,908        (877     362,031   

Restricted cash

     400,000        —          400,000   

Goodwill and other indefinite-lived intangible assets

     276,283        (2,176     274,107   

Other intangible assets, net

     210,889        (1,872     209,017   

Other non-current assets

     54,568        (706     53,862   
                        
   $ 2,496,051      $ (36,936   $ 2,459,115   
                        

Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity

      

Current liabilities

      

Accounts payable

   $ 263,316      $ (10,793   $ 252,523   

Payroll and related taxes

     79,856        512        80,368   

Accrued customer programs

     63,927        —          63,927   

Accrued liabilities

     55,430        (342     55,088   

Accrued income taxes

     10,434        1,308        11,742   

Current portion of long-term debt

     18,053        (18,053     —     

Current liabilities of discontinued operations

     24,348        (2,143     22,205   
                        

Total current liabilities

     515,364        (29,511     485,853   

Non-current liabilities

      

Long-term debt, less current portion

     825,000        —          825,000   

Non-current deferred income taxes

     58,171        (4,848     53,323   

Other non-current liabilities

     106,261        (34     106,227   
                        

Total non-current liabilities

     989,432        (4,882     984,550   

Shareholders’ equity

      

Controlling interest shareholders’ equity:

      

Preferred stock, without par value, 10,000 shares authorized

     —          —          —     

Common stock, without par value, 200,000 shares authorized

     404,879        1        404,880   

Accumulated other comprehensive income

     64,088        (2,366     61,722   

Retained earnings

     520,440        363        520,803   
                        
     989,407        (2,002     987,405   

Noncontrolling interest

     1,848        (541     1,307   
                        

Total shareholders’ equity

     991,255        (2,543     988,712   
                        
   $ 2,496,051      $ (36,936   $ 2,459,115   
                        

 

-10-


Table of Contents

PERRIGO COMPANY

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(in thousands)

(unaudited)

 

     Six Months Ended December 26, 2009  
     As Reported     Adjustments     After Voluntary
Change in
Accounting
Principle
 

Cash Flows (For) From Operating Activities

      

Net income

   $ 112,192      $ 482      $ 112,674   

Adjustments to derive cash flows

      

Write-off of in-process research and development

     14,000        —          14,000   

Depreciation and amortization

     35,907        (1,666     34,241   

Share-based compensation

     7,695        —          7,695   

Income tax benefit from exercise of stock options

     (145     —          (145

Excess tax benefit of stock transactions

     (4,351     —          (4,351

Deferred income taxes

     (10,400     (4,089     (14,489
                        

Sub-total

     154,898        (5,273     149,625   
                        

Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of asset and business acquisitions

      

Accounts receivable

     (13,363     (11,816     (25,179

Inventories

     (29,408     6,726        (22,682

Income taxes refundable

     (1,958     3,733        1,775   

Accounts payable

     (7,130     (1,937     (9,067

Payroll and related taxes

     24,820        4,136        28,956   

Accrued customer programs

     9,354        —          9,354   

Accrued liabilities

     (5,467     1,844        (3,623

Accrued income taxes

     23,885        (5,327     18,558   

Other

     3,863        4,506        8,369   
                        

Sub-total

     4,596        1,865        6,461   
                        

Net cash from operating activities

     159,494        (3,408     156,086   
                        

Cash Flows (For) From Investing Activities

      

Acquired research and development

     (14,000     —          (14,000

Acquisition of business, net of cash acquired

     (10,059     —          (10,059

Acquisitions of assets

     (10,262     —          (10,262

Additions to property and equipment

     (20,886     (2,374     (23,260
                        

Net cash for investing activities

     (55,207     (2,374     (57,581
                        

Cash Flows (For) From Financing Activities

      

Repayments of long-term debt

     (50,000     (17,771     (67,771

Excess tax benefit of stock transactions

     4,351        —          4,351   

Issuance of common stock

     11,249        —          11,249   

Repurchase of common stock

     (70,804     —          (70,804

Cash dividends

     (10,838     —          (10,838
                        

Net cash for financing activities

     (116,042     (17,771     (133,813
                        

Effect of exchange rate changes on cash

     (895     1,006        111   
                        

Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents

     (12,650     (22,547     (35,197

Cash and cash equivalents of continuing operations, beginning of period

     316,133        1,505        317,638   

Cash balance of discontinued operations, beginning of period

     4        —          4   
                        

Cash and cash equivalents, end of period

     303,487        (21,042     282,445   

Less cash balance of discontinued operations, end of period

     (5     —          (5
                        

Cash and cash equivalents of continuing operations, end of period

   $ 303,482      $ (21,042   $ 282,440   
                        

 

-11-


Table of Contents

Operating results for the six months ended December 25, 2010 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for a full year. The unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and footnotes included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 26, 2010.

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

In December 2010, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) 2010-29, “Business Combinations (ASC Topic 805): Disclosure of Supplementary Pro Forma Information for Business Combinations.” The amendments in this ASU affect any public entity as defined by ASC Topic 805 that enters into business combinations that are material on an individual or aggregate basis. The amendments in this ASU specify that if a public entity presents comparative financial statements, the entity should disclose revenue and earnings of the combined entity as though the business combination(s) that occurred during the current year had occurred as of the beginning of the comparable prior annual reporting period only. The amendments also expand the supplemental pro forma disclosures to include a description of the nature and amount of material, nonrecurring pro forma adjustments directly attributable to the business combination included in the reported pro forma revenue and earnings. The amendments are effective prospectively for business combinations for which the acquisition date is on or after the beginning of the first annual reporting period beginning on or after December 15, 2010. Early adoption is permitted. This guidance will be effective for the Company in the first quarter of fiscal 2012. Accordingly, the effects of the Company’s adoption of this guidance will depend upon the extent and magnitude of business combinations the Company enters into after June 25, 2011.

In December 2010, the FASB issued ASU 2010-28, “Intangibles - Goodwill and Other (ASC Topic 350): When to Perform Step 2 of the Goodwill Impairment Test for Reporting Units with Zero or Negative Carrying Amounts.” The amendments in this ASU modify Step 1 of the goodwill impairment test for reporting units with zero or negative carrying amounts. For those reporting units, an entity is required to perform Step 2 of the goodwill impairment test if it is more likely than not that a goodwill impairment exists. In determining whether it is more likely than not that a goodwill impairment exists, an entity should consider whether there are any adverse qualitative factors indicating that an impairment may exist. The qualitative factors are consistent with the existing guidance and examples, which require that goodwill of a reporting unit be tested for impairment between annual tests if an event occurs or circumstances change that would more likely than not reduce the fair value of a reporting unit below its carrying amount. For public entities, the amendments in this ASU are effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2010. Early adoption is not permitted. This guidance will be effective for the Company in the first quarter of fiscal 2012. The Company does not expect this ASU to have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.

In December 2010, the FASB issued ASU 2010-27, “Other Expenses (ASC Topic 720): Fees Paid to the Federal Government by Pharmaceutical Manufacturers.” This ASU provides guidance on how pharmaceutical manufacturers should recognize and classify in their income statements fees mandated by the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act as amended by the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act (the Acts). The Acts impose an annual fee on the pharmaceutical manufacturing industry for each calendar year beginning on or after January 1, 2011. An entity’s portion of the annual fee is payable no later than September 30 of the applicable calendar year and is not tax deductible. A portion of the annual fee will be allocated to individual entities on the basis of the amount of their branded prescription drug sales for the preceding year as a percentage of the industry’s branded prescription drug sales for the same period. An entity’s portion of the annual fee becomes payable to the U.S. Treasury once a pharmaceutical manufacturing entity has a gross receipt from branded prescription drug sales to any specified government program or in accordance with coverage under any government program for each calendar year beginning on or after January 1, 2011. The amendments in this ASU specify that the liability for the fee should be estimated and recorded in full upon the first qualifying sale with a corresponding deferred cost that is amortized to expense using a straight-line method of allocation unless another method better allocates the fee over the calendar year that it is payable. The amendments in this ASU are effective for calendar years beginning after December 31, 2010, when the fee initially becomes effective. Given the small number of branded drugs in the Company’s portfolio, the Company does not expect this ASU to have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.

 

-12-


Table of Contents

In April 2010, the FASB issued ASU 2010-17, “Revenue Recognition - Milestone Method (ASC Topic 605): Milestone Method of Revenue Recognition.” The amendments in this ASU provide guidance on defining a milestone and determining when it may be appropriate to apply the milestone method of revenue recognition for research and development transactions. Consideration that is contingent on achievement of a milestone in its entirety may be recognized as revenue in the period in which the milestone is achieved only if the milestone is judged to meet certain criteria to be considered substantive. The amendments in the ASU are effective on a prospective basis for milestones achieved in fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning on or after June 15, 2010. Early adoption was permitted. Vendors may also elect to adopt the amendments in the ASU retrospectively for all prior periods. The guidance in this ASU was effective for the Company in the first quarter of fiscal 2011. ASU 2010-17 did not have any impact on the Company’s condensed consolidated financial statements upon adoption.

In December 2009, the FASB issued ASU 2009-16, “Transfers and Servicing (ASC Topic 860) - Accounting for Transfers of Financial Assets.” ASU 2009-16 revises previous authoritative guidance related to accounting for transfers of financial assets and requires more disclosures about transfers of financial assets, including securitization transactions, and where entities have continuing exposure to the risks related to transferred financial assets. Among other things, ASU 2009-16 eliminates the concept of a “qualifying special-purpose entity”, changes the requirements for derecognizing financial assets and enhances information reported to users of financial statements by providing greater transparency about transfers of financial assets and an entity’s continuing involvement in transferred financial assets. ASU 2009-16 is effective at the start of a reporting entity’s first fiscal year beginning after November 15, 2009. Early adoption was not permitted. This guidance was effective for the Company in the first quarter of fiscal 2011. ASU 2009-16 did not have any impact on the Company’s condensed consolidated results of operations or its financial position upon adoption.

In October 2009, the FASB issued ASU 2009-13, “Revenue Recognition (ASC Topic 605)–Multiple-Deliverable Revenue Arrangements.” ASU 2009-13 amends the criteria in ASC Subtopic 605-25, “Revenue Recognition–Multiple-Element Arrangements,” for separating consideration in multiple-deliverable arrangements. This ASU addresses the accounting for multiple-deliverable arrangements to enable vendors to account for products or services (deliverables) separately rather than as a combined unit. ASU 2009-13 modifies the requirements for determining whether a deliverable can be treated as a separate unit of accounting by removing the criteria that verifiable and objective evidence of fair value exists for the undelivered elements. This guidance eliminates the residual method of allocation and requires that arrangement consideration be allocated at the inception of the arrangement to all deliverables using the relative selling price method. This guidance establishes a selling price hierarchy for determining the selling price of a deliverable, which is based on: a) vendor-specific objective evidence; b) third-party evidence; or c) estimates. In addition, this guidance significantly expands required disclosures related to a vendor’s multiple-deliverable revenue arrangements. ASU 2009-13 is effective prospectively for revenue arrangements entered into or materially modified in fiscal years beginning on or after June 15, 2010, with early adoption permitted. The Company adopted this ASU effective June 27, 2010. Accordingly, the effects of the Company’s adoption of this guidance will depend upon the extent and magnitude of revenue arrangements the Company enters into or materially modifies after June 26, 2010.

NOTE 2 – ACQUISITIONS

Acquired Research and Development

On September 21, 2009, the Company acquired the Abbreviated New Drug Application (ANDA) for clindamycin phosphate (1%) and benzoyl peroxide (5%) gel from KV Pharmaceutical for $14,000 in cash and a $2,000 milestone payment to be made upon the successful completion of a contingency. Successful completion of the contingency is expected by early fiscal 2012. This product is the equivalent of Duac® gel which is indicated for the topical treatment of inflammatory acne vulgaris. Duac® gel is marketed by Stiefel Laboratories’ (Stiefel), a subsidiary of GlaxoSmithKline. Excluding the milestone payment, the full amount of the purchase price, which related to acquired research and development, was capitalized and immediately written off as in-process research and development in the first quarter of fiscal 2010 in the Company’s Rx Pharmaceuticals segment.

 

-13-


Table of Contents

Asset Acquisitions

On July 1, 2009, the Company’s Israel Pharmaceutical and Diagnostics Products operating segment entered into a distribution agreement with a major global diagnostic company. In conjunction with this distribution agreement, the Company acquired certain pharmaceutical diagnostic assets from a local pharmaceutical company for $4,610. The acquisition enhanced the Company’s product portfolio and strengthened its position as the leader in the Israeli pharmaceutical diagnostic market. The assets acquired in this transaction consisted primarily of intangible assets associated with customer supply contracts, machinery and equipment, and inventory. The assets acquired and the related operating results from the acquisition date were included in the Other category in the Company’s condensed consolidated financial statements beginning in the first quarter of fiscal 2010.

The purchase price of $4,610 was allocated as follows:

 

Inventory

   $ 1,346   

Property and equipment

     1,262   

Intangible assets – Customer contracts

     2,002   
        

Total assets acquired

   $ 4,610   
        

Management assigned fair value to the identifiable intangible assets by estimating the discounted forecasted cash flows related to the customer contracts. The average estimated useful lives of the contracts are six years and are amortized on a straight-line basis. Assumptions used in the valuation included a discount rate of 11%.

At the time of the acquisition, a step-up in the value of inventory of $606 was recorded in the allocation of the purchase price based on valuation estimates, of which $320 was charged to cost of sales in the first quarter of fiscal 2010 as the inventory was sold. The remainder of the step-up in value was charged to cost of sales in the second quarter of fiscal 2010 as the inventory was sold.

On November 2, 2009, in connection with this same distribution agreement, the Company’s Israel Pharmaceutical and Diagnostic Products operating segment acquired certain pharmaceutical diagnostic assets from another local pharmaceutical company for $5,152. This acquisition enhanced the Company’s product portfolio and strengthened its position as the leader in the Israeli pharmaceutical diagnostic market. The assets acquired in this transaction consisted primarily of intangible assets associated with customer supply contracts, machinery and equipment, and inventory. The assets and the related operating results from the acquisition date were included in the Other category in the Company’s condensed consolidated financial statements beginning in the second quarter of fiscal 2010.

The purchase price of $5,152 was allocated as follows:

 

Inventory

   $ 869   

Property and equipment

     600   

Intangible assets – Customer contracts

     3,683   
        

Total assets acquired

   $ 5,152   
        

Management assigned fair value to the identifiable intangible assets by estimating the discounted forecasted cash flows related to the customer contracts. The average estimated useful lives of the contracts are six years and are amortized on a straight-line basis. Assumptions used in the valuation included a discount rate of 11%.

At the time of the acquisition, a step-up in the value of inventory of $417 was recorded in the allocation of the purchase price based on valuation estimates, of which $325 was charged to cost of sales in the second quarter of fiscal 2010 as the inventory was sold. The remainder of the step-up in value was charged to cost of sales in the third quarter of fiscal 2010 as the inventory was sold.

 

-14-


Table of Contents

Pending Business Acquisition

Paddock Laboratories, Inc. – On January 20, 2011, the Company announced that it had signed a definitive agreement to acquire substantially all of the assets of privately-held Paddock Laboratories, Inc. (Paddock) for approximately $540,000 in cash. As of the end of the second quarter of fiscal 2011, the Company incurred approximately $1,300 of acquisition costs, which were expensed in operations in the second quarter of fiscal 2011. Headquartered in Minneapolis, Minnesota, Paddock is a manufacturer and marketer of generic Rx pharmaceutical products. The acquisition, which is expected to be completed in the Company’s fourth quarter of fiscal 2011, will expand the Company’s generic Rx extended topical product offering, pipeline and scale.

Business Acquisitions

PBM Holdings, Inc. – On April 30, 2010, the Company acquired 100% of the shares of PBM for $839,369, which included cash acquired as of the transaction date of $30,591. As of the end of the fourth quarter of fiscal 2010, the Company incurred approximately $11,100 of acquisitions costs, of which approximately $3,200 and $7,900 were expensed in operations in the third and fourth quarter of fiscal 2010, respectively. Headquartered in Gordonsville, Virginia, PBM was the leading manufacturer and distributor of store brand infant formulas, pediatric nutritionals and baby foods sold by leading retailers in the mass, club, grocery and drug channels in the U.S., Canada, Mexico and China. The acquisition was accounted for under the acquisition method of accounting, and the related assets acquired and liabilities assumed were recorded at fair value. The operating results for PBM were included in the Nutritionals segment of the Company’s consolidated results of operations beginning May 1, 2010.

The preliminary allocation of the $839,369 purchase price through December 25, 2010 was:

 

Cash

   $ 30,591   

Accounts receivable

     18,893   

Inventory

     38,419   

Property and equipment

     62,084   

Other assets

     3,816   

Goodwill

     329,578   

Intangible assets

     382,500   
        

Total assets acquired

     865,881   
        

Accounts payable

     10,231   

Other current liabilities

     125   

Accrued expenses

     16,156   
        

Total liabilities assumed

     26,512   
        

Net assets acquired

   $ 839,369   
        

This preliminary purchase price is subject to finalization of certain pre-acquisition tax-related contingencies and a post-closing working capital adjustment. During the first quarter of fiscal 2011, the Company received $1,998 as part of the post-closing working capital adjustment, which was accounted for as a reduction of the purchase price with a corresponding reduction in goodwill.

The excess of the purchase price over the fair value of net assets acquired, amounting to $329,578, was recorded as goodwill in the condensed consolidated balance sheet and was assigned to the Company’s Nutritionals segment. Goodwill is not amortized for financial reporting purposes but is amortized for tax purposes. See Note 7 regarding the timing of the Company’s annual goodwill impairment testing.

 

-15-


Table of Contents

Intangible assets acquired in the acquisition were valued as follows:

 

Product formulations

   $ 107,000   

Developed product technology

     4,200   

Trade names and trademarks

     1,900   

Distribution agreements

     18,000   

Customer relationships

     250,000   

Non-compete agreement

     1,400   
        

Total intangible assets acquired

   $ 382,500   
        

Management assigned fair values to the identifiable intangible assets through a combination of the relief from royalty method, the discounted cash flow method and the lost income method. Developed product technology and product formulations are based on a 15 and 10-year useful lives, respectively, and amortized on a straight-line basis. Trade names and trademarks are based on an indefinite life. Distribution agreements and customer relationships are based on a 20-year useful life and amortized on an accelerated basis. The non-compete agreement is based on a five-year life and amortized on a straight-line basis.

At the time of the acquisition, a step-up in the value of inventory of $9,402 was recorded in the allocation of the purchase price based on valuation estimates, all of which was charged to cost of sales in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2010 as the inventory was sold. In addition, fixed assets were written up by $5,002 to their estimated fair market value based on a valuation method that included both the cost and market approaches. This additional step-up in value is being depreciated over the estimated useful lives of the assets.

Orion Laboratories Pty Ltd. – On March 8, 2010, the Company acquired 100% of the outstanding shares of privately-held Orion Laboratories Pty Ltd. (Orion) for $48,638 in cash. The Company incurred approximately $600 of acquisition costs, all of which were expensed in operations in the third quarter of fiscal 2010. Located near Perth, Western Australia, Orion was a leading supplier of OTC store brand pharmaceutical products in Australia and New Zealand. In addition, Orion manufactured and distributed pharmaceutical products supplied to hospitals in Australia. The acquisition of Orion expanded the Company’s global presence and product portfolio into Australia and New Zealand. The acquisition was accounted for under the acquisition method of accounting, and the related assets acquired and liabilities assumed were recorded at fair value. The operating results for Orion were included in the Consumer Healthcare segment of the Company’s consolidated results of operations beginning March 8, 2010.

The preliminary allocation of the $48,638 purchase price through December 25, 2010 was:

 

Cash

   $ 671   

Accounts receivable

     3,146   

Inventory

     4,484   

Property and equipment

     11,490   

Other assets

     247   

Goodwill

     22,095   

Intangible assets

     15,600   
        

Total assets acquired

     57,733   
        

Accounts payable

     2,247   

Other current liabilities

     954   

Deferred tax liability

     4,791   

Taxes payable

     1,103   
        

Total liabilities assumed

     9,095   
        

Net assets acquired

   $ 48,638   
        

This preliminary purchase price is subject to adjustment once book/tax basis differences and a post-closing working capital adjustment have been finalized. The purchase price was reduced by $859 in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2010 as the result of a partial settlement of the working capital accounts. These matters are anticipated to be resolved by the third quarter of fiscal 2011.

 

-16-


Table of Contents

The excess of the purchase price over the fair value of net assets acquired, amounting to $22,095, was recorded as goodwill in the condensed consolidated balance sheet and was assigned to the Company’s Consumer Healthcare segment. Goodwill is not amortized for financial reporting or tax purposes. See Note 7 regarding the timing of the Company’s annual goodwill impairment testing.

Intangible assets acquired in the acquisition were valued as follows:

 

Product formulations

   $ 1,182   

Customer relationships

     12,000   

Non-compete agreements

     2,418   
        

Total intangible assets acquired

   $ 15,600   
        

Management assigned fair values to the identifiable intangible assets through a combination of the relief from royalty method, the discounted cash flow method and the lost income method. Product formulations are based on a 10-year useful life and amortized on a straight-line basis. Customer relationships are based on 15 or 10-year useful lives based on the type of relationship and are amortized on an accelerated basis consistent with projected revenues over the lives of the relationships. There are three non-compete agreements, each based on a five-year life and amortized on a straight-line basis.

At the time of the acquisition, a step-up in the value of inventory of $495 was recorded in the allocation of the purchase price based on valuation estimates, all of which was charged to cost of sales in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2010 as the inventory was sold. In addition, fixed assets were written up by $1,132 to their estimated fair market value based on a valuation method that included both the cost and market approaches. This additional step-up in value is being depreciated over the estimated useful lives of the assets.

Vedants Drug & Fine Chemicals Private Ltd. – To further improve the long-term cost position of its API business, on August 6, 2009, the Company acquired an 85% stake in Vedants Drug & Fine Chemicals Private Limited (Vedants), an API manufacturing facility in India, for $11,500 in cash. The facility, located approximately 30 miles outside of Mumbai, is currently under construction and will manufacture the Company’s current and future high-volume API products, as well as expand the Company’s vertical integration of Rx and future candidate Rx-to-OTC switch products. Manufacturing of API at this facility is expected to begin in the second half of fiscal 2012 and will include certain API products currently manufactured in Israel and that had been manufactured in Germany. The acquisition was accounted for using the acquisition method, and the related assets acquired and liabilities assumed were recorded at fair value. The operating results for Vedants are included in the API segment of the Company’s condensed consolidated results of operations beginning August 6, 2009. Operations related to the noncontrolling interest are currently immaterial.

 

-17-


Table of Contents

The purchase price of $11,500 was allocated as follows:

 

Cash

   $ 1,441   

Accounts receivable

     168   

Inventory

     2   

Property and equipment

     8,436   

Goodwill

     4,183   
        

Total assets acquired

     14,230   
        

Accounts payable

     171   

Other liabilities

     1,289   

Noncontrolling interest

     1,270   
        

Total liabilities and equity assumed

     2,730   
        

Net assets acquired

   $ 11,500   
        

The excess of the purchase price over the fair value of net assets acquired, amounting to $4,183, was recorded as goodwill in the condensed consolidated balance sheet and has been assigned to the Company’s API segment. Goodwill is not amortized for financial reporting or tax purposes. See Note 7 regarding the timing of the Company’s annual goodwill impairment testing.

NOTE 3 – DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS

In March 2009, the Company committed to a plan to sell its Israel Consumer Products business. This business primarily sold consumer products to the Israeli market, including cosmetics, toiletries and detergents, and was previously reported as part of the Company’s Other category. Based on management’s strategic review of its portfolio of businesses, the Company decided to sell the Israel Consumer Products business to a third party. In the third quarter of fiscal 2009, the Israel Consumer Products business had met the criteria set forth in ASC Subtopic 360-10 to be accounted for as discontinued operations.

On November 2, 2009, the Company announced that it had signed a definitive agreement to sell the Israel Consumer Products business to Emilia Group. On February 26, 2010, the sale to Emilia Group was completed for approximately $47,000, of which approximately $11,000, subject to foreign currency fluctuations between the Israeli shekel and the U.S. dollar, is contingent upon satisfaction of contingency factors specified in the agreement. The final purchase price is subject to post-closing working capital adjustments as defined by the agreement. The Company is currently in arbitration in order to settle the final post-closing working capital adjustment. The sale was completed in the third quarter of fiscal 2010 resulting in a pre-tax gain on the sale of $750. Under the terms of the agreement, the Company will provide distribution and support services for the importation of private label cosmetics from this business into the U.S. market for up to 12 months after the close of the transaction. These services will be fully transferred to Emilia Group by the end of the third quarter of fiscal 2011.

The Company has reflected the results of this business as discontinued operations in the condensed consolidated statements of income for all periods presented. The assets and liabilities of this business are reflected as assets and liabilities of discontinued operations in the condensed consolidated balance sheets for all periods presented. The cash flows related to the support and distribution services that the Company continues to provide are immaterial and limited in duration, and therefore, the Israel Consumer Products business is classified as discontinued operations.

 

-18-


Table of Contents

Results of discontinued operations were as follows:

 

     Second Quarter     Year-to-Date  
     2011     2010     2011     2010  

Net sales

   $ 5,709      $ 21,229      $ 10,738      $ 44,361   

Income (loss) before income taxes

   $ 722      $ (1,956   $ 1,829      $ (653

Income tax expense

     (334     (22     (744     (564
                                

Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax

   $ 388      $ (1,978   $ 1,085      $ (1,217
                                

The assets and liabilities classified as discontinued operations as of December 25, 2010, June 26, 2010 and December 26, 2009 were as follows:

 

     December 25,
2010
     June 26,
2010
     December 26,
2009
 

Cash

   $ —         $ —         $ 5   

Accounts receivable, net

     2,282         1,700         18,050   

Inventories

     4,193         5,482         26,047   

Prepaid expenses and other current assets

     67         193         7,399   

Property and equipment, net

     —           —           15,468   

Other intangible assets, net

     —           —           3,376   
                          

Current assets of discontinued operations

   $ 6,542       $ 7,375       $ 70,345   
                          

Accounts payable

   $ 5,103       $ 3,482       $ 13,724   

Accrued payroll and other accrued liabilities

     8,155         976         7,066   

Deferred income taxes

     986         912         1,415   
                          

Current liabilities of discontinued operations

   $ 14,244       $ 5,370       $ 22,205   
                          

As of December 25, 2010, the remaining assets and liabilities recorded in discontinued operations relate to distribution services that will cease by the end of the third quarter of fiscal 2011, as specified in the transaction agreement.

NOTE 4 – EARNINGS PER SHARE

A reconciliation of the numerators and denominators used in the basic and diluted earnings per share (EPS) calculation follows:

 

     Second Quarter     Year-to-Date  
     2011      2010     2011      2010  

Numerator:

       

Income from continuing operations

   $ 89,779       $ 62,791      $ 163,457       $ 113,891   

Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax

     388         (1,978     1,085         (1,217
                                  

Net income used for both basic and diluted EPS

   $ 90,167       $ 60,813      $ 164,542       $ 112,674   
                                  

Denominator:

       

Weighted average shares outstanding for basic EPS

     92,232         91,634        92,031         91,646   

Dilutive effect of share-based awards

     1,131         1,365        1,249         1,372   
                                  

Weighted average shares outstanding for diluted EPS

     93,363         92,999        93,280         93,018   
                                  

 

-19-


Table of Contents

Share-based awards outstanding that were anti-dilutive were 171 and 302 for the second quarter of fiscal 2011 and 2010, respectively. Year-to-date share-based awards outstanding that were anti-dilutive were 119 and 478 for fiscal 2011 and 2010, respectively. These share-based awards were excluded from the diluted EPS calculation.

NOTE 5 – FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

ASC Topic 820, “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures” (ASC 820), provides a consistent definition of fair value, which focuses on exit price, prioritizes the use of market-based inputs over entity-specific inputs for measuring fair value and establishes a three-level hierarchy for fair value measurements. ASC 820 requires fair value measurements to be classified and disclosed in one of the following three categories:

 

  Level 1: Quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets and liabilities.

 

  Level 2: Either direct or indirect inputs, other than quoted prices included within Level 1, which are observable for similar assets or liabilities.

 

  Level 3: Valuations derived from valuation techniques in which one or more significant inputs are unobservable.

The following tables summarize the valuation of the Company’s financial instruments by the above pricing categories as of December 25, 2010, June 26, 2010 and December 26, 2009:

 

     Fair Value Measurements as of December 25, 2010 Using:  
     Total as of
December 25,
2010
     Quoted Prices
In Active
Markets
(Level 1)
     Prices With
Other
Observable
Inputs

(Level 2)
     Prices With
Unobservable
Inputs

(Level 3)
 

Assets:

           

Cash equivalents

   $ 67,998       $ 67,998       $ —         $ —     

Investment securities

     5,435         —           —           5,435   

Funds associated with Israeli post employment benefits

     16,551         —           16,551         —     

Foreign currency forward contracts, net

     1,791         —           1,791         —     

Interest rate swap agreements

     2,150         —           2,150         —     
                                   

Total

   $ 93,925       $ 67,998       $ 20,492       $ 5,435   
                                   

 

-20-


Table of Contents
     Fair Value Measurements as of June 26, 2010 Using:  
     Total as of
June 26,
2010
     Quoted Prices
In Active
Markets
(Level 1)
     Prices With
Other
Observable
Inputs

(Level 2)
     Prices With
Unobservable
Inputs

(Level 3)
 

Assets:

           

Cash equivalents

   $ 67,887       $ 67,887       $ —         $ —     

Investment securities

     4,950         —           —           4,950   

Funds associated with Israeli post employment benefits

     15,024         —           15,024         —     
                                   

Total

   $ 87,861       $ 67,887       $ 15,024       $ 4,950   
                                   

Liabilities:

           

Foreign currency forward contracts, net

   $ 4,525       $ —         $ 4,525       $ —     
                                   

Total

   $ 4,525       $ —         $ 4,525       $ —     
                                   
     Fair Value Measurements as of December 26, 2009 Using:  
     Total as of
December 26,
2009
     Quoted Prices
In Active
Markets
(Level 1)
     Prices With
Other
Observable
Inputs

(Level 2)
     Prices With
Unobservable
Inputs

(Level 3)
 

Assets:

           

Cash equivalents

   $ 150,766       $ 150,766       $ —         $ —     

Investment securities

     4,961         —           —           4,961   

Funds associated with Israeli post employment benefits

     12,292         —           12,292         —     

Foreign currency forward contracts, net

     152         —           152         —     
                                   

Total

   $ 168,171       $ 150,766       $ 12,444       $ 4,961   
                                   

Liabilities:

           

Interest rate swap agreements

   $ 925       $ —         $ 925       $ —     
                                   

Total

   $ 925       $ —         $ 925       $ —     
                                   

 

-21-


Table of Contents

The carrying amounts of the Company’s financial instruments, consisting of cash and cash equivalents, investment securities, accounts receivable, accounts payable and variable rate long-term debt, approximate their fair value. As of December 25, 2010, the carrying value and fair value of the Company’s fixed rate long-term debt were $615,000 and $630,478, respectively. As of June 26, 2010, the carrying value and fair value of the Company’s fixed rate long-term debt were $615,000 and $644,016, respectively. As a result of the prepayment of the letter of undertaking on July 19, 2010, as discussed in Note 8, the fair values of both the letter of undertaking and the restricted cash deposit approximated their carrying values as of June 26, 2010. As of December 26, 2009, the carrying value and fair value of the Company’s fixed rate long-term debt were $600,000 and $616,171, respectively. The carrying value and fair value of the corresponding restricted cash deposit were $400,000 and $413,172, respectively, as of December 26, 2009. Fair values were calculated by discounting the future cash flows of the financial instruments to their present value, using interest rates currently offered for borrowings and deposits of similar nature and remaining maturities. There were no transfers between Level 1 and Level 2 during the three and six months ended December 25, 2010. The Company’s policy regarding the recording of transfers between levels is to record any such transfers at the end of the reporting period.

As of December 25, 2010, the Company had $16,551 deposited in funds managed by financial institutions that are designated by management to cover post employment benefits for its Israeli employees. Israeli law generally requires payment of severance upon dismissal of an employee or upon termination of employment in certain other circumstances. These funds are included in the Company’s long-term investments reported in other non-current assets. The Company’s Level 2 securities values are determined using prices for recently traded financial instruments with similar underlying terms as well as directly or indirectly observable inputs, such as interest rates and yield curves that are observable at commonly quoted intervals.

The Company’s investment securities include auction rate securities (ARS) totaling $18,000 in par value. ARS are privately placed variable rate debt instruments whose interest rates are reset within a contractual range, approximately every 7 to 35 days. Historically, the carrying value of ARS approximated their fair value due to the frequent resetting of the interest rates at auction. With the tightening of the credit markets beginning in calendar 2008, ARS have failed to settle at auction resulting in an illiquid market for these types of securities for an extended period of time. While there are some recent indications that a market is starting to materialize for these securities, though at a much reduced level than the pre-2008 period, the Company cannot predict when liquidity will return for these securities. The Company has reclassified the securities from current assets to other non-current assets due to the unpredictable nature and the illiquidity of the market for the securities.

The Company currently engages the services of an independent third-party valuation firm to assist the Company in estimating the current fair value of the ARS using a discounted cash flow analysis and an assessment of secondary markets, as well as other factors. During the second quarter of fiscal 2011, the Company received an updated estimate for the current fair value of these securities and based on this estimation and other factors, the Company recorded an unrealized gain of $1,042, net of tax, in other comprehensive income. At December 25, 2010, June 26, 2010 and December 26, 2009, these securities were considered as available-for-sale and were recorded at a fair value of $5,435, $4,950 and $4,961, respectively. Although the Company continues to earn and collect interest on these investments at the maximum contractual rate, the estimated fair value of ARS cannot be determined by the auction process until liquidity is restored to these markets. The Company will continue to monitor the credit worthiness of the companies that issued these securities and other appropriate factors and make such adjustments as it deems necessary to reflect the fair value of these securities. All of the ARS investments have a contractual maturity of more than five years as of December 25, 2010. The gross realized gains and losses on the sale of ARS are determined using the specific identification method.

In the second quarter of fiscal 2011, the Company sold its collateralized debt obligations backed primarily by U.S. Treasury obligations for proceeds of $560. As of December 25, 2010, the Company no longer held any collateralized debt obligations.

 

-22-


Table of Contents

The following table presents a rollforward of the assets measured at fair value using unobservable inputs (Level 3) at December 25, 2010:

 

     Investment
Securities
(Level 3)
 

Assets:

  

Balance as of June 26, 2010

   $ 4,950   

Transfers into Level 3

     —     

Proceeds from sale of collateralized debt

     (560

Unrealized gain on ARS

     1,042   

Foreign currency translation

     3   
        

Balance as of December 25, 2010

   $ 5,435   
        

NOTE 6 – INVENTORIES

Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market and are summarized as follows:

 

     December 25,
2010
     June 26,
2010
     December 26,
2009
 

Finished goods

   $ 222,155       $ 213,068       $ 177,334   

Work in process

     118,819         116,618         119,292   

Raw materials

     142,813         123,294         114,603   
                          

Total inventories

   $ 483,787       $ 452,980       $ 411,229   
                          

NOTE 7 – GOODWILL AND OTHER INTANGIBLE ASSETS

In the first six months of fiscal 2011, there were no additions to goodwill. The Company performs its annual testing for goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible asset impairment at the beginning of the fourth quarter of the fiscal year for all reporting units. Changes in the carrying amount of goodwill, by reportable segment, were as follows:

 

     Consumer
Healthcare
     Nutritionals     Rx
Pharmaceuticals
     API      Total  

Balance as of June 26, 2010

   $ 124,331       $ 333,021      $ 72,725       $ 88,011       $ 618,088   

Purchase price adjustment

     —           (1,998     —           —           (1,998

Currency translation adjustment

     4,801         —          5,559         6,440         16,800   
                                           

Balance as of December 25, 2010

   $ 129,132       $ 331,023      $ 78,284       $ 94,451       $ 632,890   
                                           

 

-23-


Table of Contents

Other intangible assets and related accumulated amortization consisted of the following:

 

     December 25, 2010      June 26, 2010      December 26, 2009  
     Gross      Accumulated
Amortization
     Gross      Accumulated
Amortization
     Gross      Accumulated
Amortization
 

Amortizable intangibles:

                 

Developed product technology/formulation and product rights

   $ 321,537       $ 85,295       $ 311,319       $ 69,128       $ 201,893       $ 61,520   

Distribution and license agreements

     45,680         17,589         41,123         16,048         29,011         15,674   

Customer relationships

     329,234         23,725         326,404         15,414         60,821         11,467   

Trademarks

     5,178         721         4,691         716         5,153         712   

Non-compete agreements

     6,249         1,782         5,895         1,126         2,160         648   
                                                     

Total

     707,878         129,112         689,432         102,432         299,038         90,021   
                                                     

Non-amortizable intangibles:

                 

Trade names and trademarks

     6,691         —           6,575         —           4,865         —     
                                                     

Total intangibles

   $ 714,569       $ 129,112       $ 696,007       $ 102,432       $ 303,903       $ 90,021   
                                                     

Certain intangible assets are denominated in currencies other than the U.S. dollar; therefore, their gross and net carrying values are subject to foreign currency movements.

The Company recorded amortization expense of $22,662 and $11,059 for the first half of fiscal 2011 and 2010, respectively, for intangible assets subject to amortization. The increase in amortization expense in the first half of fiscal 2011 was due primarily to the incremental amortization expense incurred on the intangible assets acquired as part of the PBM acquisition.

Estimated future amortization expense includes the additional amortization related to recently acquired intangible assets subject to amortization. No estimate of future amortization expense related to the pending Paddock acquisition has been included in the table below. The estimated amortization expense for each of the following five years is as follows:

 

Fiscal Year

   Amount  

2011 (1)

   $ 22,700   

2012

     48,800   

2013

     50,500   

2014

     50,400   

2015

     49,400   

 

(1)

Reflects remaining six months of fiscal 2011.

 

-24-


Table of Contents

NOTE 8 – INDEBTEDNESS

Total borrowings outstanding are summarized as follows:

 

     December 25,
2010
     June 26,
2010
     December 26,
2009
 

Short-term debt:

        

Swingline loan

   $ —         $ 9,000       $ —     

Line of credit – India subsidiary

     971         —           —     

Current portion of long-term debt:

        

Letter of undertaking-Israeli subsidiary

     —           400,000         —     

Term loan

     15,000         —           —     
                          

Total

     15,971         409,000         —     
                          

Long-term debt:

        

Revolving line of credit

     —           95,000         —     

Term loans

     260,000         225,000         225,000   

Senior notes

     615,000         615,000         200,000   

Letter of undertaking – Israeli subsidiary

     —           —           400,000   
                          

Total

     875,000         935,000         825,000   
                          

Total debt

   $ 890,971       $ 1,344,000       $ 825,000   
                          

On March 16, 2005, the Company’s Israeli holding company subsidiary entered into a letter of undertaking and obtained a loan in the sum of $400,000. The terms required the Company to maintain a deposit of $400,000 in an uninsured account with the lender as security for the loan. In the first quarter of fiscal 2011, the Company elected to prepay the entire loan balance of $400,000 using the restricted cash deposit discussed above. The prepayment was completed on July 19, 2010.

On July 23, 2009, the Company entered into an accounts receivable securitization program (the Securitization Program) with several of its wholly owned subsidiaries and Bank of America Securities, LLC (Bank of America). The Securitization Program is a 364-day facility, and on July 22, 2010, the Company renewed the Securitization Program with Bank of America, as Agent, and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association (Wells Fargo) as Managing Agent together, the Committed Investors.

Under the terms of the Securitization Program, the subsidiaries sell certain eligible trade accounts receivables to a wholly owned bankruptcy remote special purpose entity (SPE), Perrigo Receivables, LLC. The Company has retained servicing responsibility. The SPE will then transfer an interest in the receivables to the Committed Investors. Under the terms of the Securitization Program, Bank of America and Wells Fargo have committed $100,000 and $50,000, respectively, effectively allowing the Company to borrow up to a total amount of $150,000, subject to a Maximum Net Investment calculation as defined in the agreement. At December 25, 2010, the full $150,000 was available under this calculation. The interest rate on any borrowings is based on a thirty-day LIBOR plus 0.55%. If the London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR) is not available to the Company, the Company may borrow at an alternate rate equal to the greatest of: (i) the Federal Funds Rate plus 1.50%; or (ii) the rate of interest in effect as publicly announced from time to time by the applicable Managing Agent as its “prime rate” plus 2.00%. In addition, a facility fee of 0.55% is applied to the $150,000 commitment. Under the terms of the Securitization Program, the Company may elect to have the entire amount or any portion of the facility unutilized.

Any borrowing made pursuant to the Securitization Program will be classified as short-term debt in the Company’s condensed consolidated balance sheet. The amount of the eligible receivables will vary during the year based on seasonality of the business and could, at times, limit the amount available to the Company from the sale of these interests. There were no borrowings outstanding under the Securitization Program at December 25, 2010, June 26, 2010 and December 26, 2009.

 

-25-


Table of Contents

On October 8, 2010, the Company entered into a credit agreement with a group of banks (the 2010 Credit Agreement), which provides an initial revolving loan commitment of $350,000 and an initial term loan commitment of $150,000, each subject to increase or decrease as specified in the 2010 Credit Agreement. Both loans bear interest, at the election of the Company, at either the Annual Base Rate plus an Applicable Margin or the Adjusted LIBOR plus an Applicable Margin, as specified and defined in the 2010 Credit Agreement. The obligations under the 2010 Credit Agreement are guaranteed by certain subsidiaries of the Company, and in some instances, the obligations may be secured by a pledge of 65% of the stock of certain foreign subsidiaries. The maturity date of the term and revolving loans under the 2010 Credit Agreement is October 8, 2015. The Company is using the proceeds from the term loan and revolving loan for general corporate purposes and has repaid certain other outstanding debt, including the $100,000 term loan made pursuant to the Company’s prior credit agreement.

In connection with the execution of the 2010 Credit Agreement, the Company terminated its prior credit agreement, dated as of March 16, 2005, and entered into a First Amendment to the Term Loan Agreement, dated as of April 22, 2008, which conforms certain covenants in that Term Loan Agreement to the covenants contained in the 2010 Credit Agreement and makes certain other conforming changes.

NOTE 9 – DERIVATIVE INSTRUMENTS AND HEDGING ACTIVITIES

The Company accounts for derivatives in accordance with ASC Topic 815, “Derivatives and Hedging” (ASC 815), which establishes accounting and reporting standards requiring that derivative instruments (including certain derivative instruments embedded in other contracts) be recorded on the balance sheet as either an asset or liability measured at fair value. Additionally, changes in the derivative’s fair value shall be recognized currently in earnings unless specific hedge accounting criteria are met. If hedge accounting criteria are met for cash flow hedges, the changes in a derivative’s fair value are recorded in shareholders’ equity as a component of other comprehensive income, net of tax. These deferred gains and losses are recognized in income in the period in which the hedge item and hedging instrument affect earnings. All of the Company’s designated hedging instruments are classified as cash flow hedges.

The Company is exposed to credit loss in the event of nonperformance by the counterparties on derivative contracts. It is the Company’s policy to manage its credit risk on these transactions by dealing only with financial institutions having a long-term credit rating of “A” or better and by distributing the contracts among several financial institutions to diversify credit concentration risk.

Interest Rate Hedging

The Company executes treasury-lock agreements (T-Locks) and interest rate swap agreements to manage its exposure to changes in interest rates related to its long-term borrowings. For derivative instruments designated as cash flow hedges, changes in the fair value, net of tax, are reported as a component of other comprehensive income.

In the third quarter of fiscal 2010, with the expected issuance of long-term debt to partially fund the PBM acquisition, the Company entered into T-Locks with a notional value of $230,000 to hedge the exposure to the possible rise in the benchmark interest rate prior to the issuance of Senior Notes. The T-Locks, which the Company designated as cash flow hedges, were settled in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2010 upon the issuance of an aggregate of $415,000 principal amount of Senior Notes in April 2010 for a cumulative gain of $2,253, which was recorded in other comprehensive income and is being amortized to earnings as a reduction to interest expense over the life of those Senior Notes.

In conjunction with the Company’s prior credit agreement, during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2005, the Company entered into two interest rate swap agreements to reduce the impact of fluctuations in interest rates on the aforementioned term and revolving commitments thereunder. These interest rate swap agreements were contracts to exchange floating rate for fixed rate interest payments over the life of the agreements without the exchange of the underlying notional amounts. The notional amounts of interest rate swap agreements were used to measure interest to be paid or received and did not represent the amount of exposure to credit loss. The differential paid or received on interest rate swap agreements was recognized as an adjustment to interest expense.

 

-26-


Table of Contents

The interest rate swap agreements fixed the interest rate at 4.77% on an initial notional amount of principal of $50,000 on the revolving loan and $100,000 on the term loan. During the first quarter of fiscal 2010, the Company repaid its $50,000 revolving loan commitment. Due to the repayment of the loan, the Company recorded an additional $1,100 in Other expense related to the termination and ultimate cash settlement of the interest rate swap agreement. The remaining interest rate swap agreement on the $100,000 term loan expired on March 16, 2010.

In accordance with ASC 815, the Company designated the above interest rate swaps as cash flow hedges and formally documented the relationship between the interest rate swaps and the variable rate borrowings, as well as its risk management objective and strategy for undertaking the hedge transaction. This process included linking the derivative to the specific liability or asset on the balance sheet. The Company also assessed, both at the hedge’s inception and on an ongoing basis, whether the derivative used in the hedging transaction was highly effective in offsetting changes in the cash flows of the hedged item. The effective portion of unrealized gains (losses) was deferred as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income and was recognized in earnings at the time the hedged item affected earnings. Any ineffective portion of the change in fair value was immediately recognized in earnings.

In conjunction with the Company’s 2010 Credit Agreement, in the second quarter of fiscal 2011, the Company entered into interest rate swap agreements to reduce the impact of fluctuations in interest rates on the term loan under the 2010 Credit Agreement. The interest rate swap agreements are contracts to exchange floating rate for fixed rate interest payments over the life of the agreements without the exchange of the underlying notional amounts. The notional amounts of the interest rate swap agreements are used to measure interest to be paid or received and do not represent the amount of exposure to credit loss. The differential paid or received on the interest rate swap agreements is recognized as an adjustment to interest expense. The interest rate swap agreements fix the interest rate at 1.545% on an initial notional amount of principal of $90,000 on the 2010 term loan. The interest rate swap agreements will expire October 8, 2015.

In accordance with ASC 815, the Company designated the above interest rate swaps as cash flow hedges and formally documented the relationships between the interest rate swaps and the variable rate borrowing, as well as its risk management objective and strategy for undertaking the hedge transaction. This process included linking the derivative to the specific liability or asset on the balance sheet. The Company also assesses at the hedge’s inception, and on an ongoing basis, whether the derivative used in the hedging transaction is highly effective in offsetting changes in the cash flows of the hedged item. The effective portion of unrealized gains (losses) is deferred as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income and is recognized in earnings at the time the hedged item affects earnings. Any ineffective portion of the change in fair value is immediately recognized in earnings.

Foreign Currency Contracts

The Company is exposed to foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations in the normal course of its business, which the Company manages through the use of foreign currency put, call and forward contracts. For foreign currency contracts designated as cash flow hedges, changes in the fair value of the foreign currency contracts, net of tax, are reported as a component of other comprehensive income. For foreign currency contracts not designated as hedges, changes in fair value are recorded in current period earnings.

The Company’s foreign currency hedging program consists of cash flow hedges. The Company enters into foreign currency forward contracts in order to hedge the impact of fluctuations of foreign exchange on expected future purchases and related payables denominated in a foreign currency. These forward contracts have a maximum maturity date of twelve months. In addition, the Company enters into foreign currency forward contracts in order to hedge the impact of fluctuations of foreign exchange on expected future sales and related receivables denominated in a foreign currency. These forward contracts also have a maximum maturity date of twelve months. The Company did not have any foreign currency put or call contracts as of December 25, 2010.

 

-27-


Table of Contents

In accordance with ASC 815, the Company has designated certain forward contracts as cash flow hedges and has formally documented the relationships between the forward contracts and the hedged items, as well as its risk management objective and strategy for undertaking the hedge transactions. This process includes linking the derivative to the specific liability or asset on the balance sheet. The Company also assesses, both at the hedge’s inception and on an ongoing basis, whether the derivative used in the hedging transaction is highly effective in offsetting changes in the cash flows of the hedged item. The effective portion of unrealized gains (losses) is deferred as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income and is recognized in earnings at the time the hedged item affects earnings. Any ineffective portion of the change in fair value is immediately recognized in earnings.

All derivative instruments are managed on a consolidated basis to efficiently net exposures and thus take advantage of any natural offsets. The absolute value of the notional amounts of derivative contracts for the Company approximates $213,700. Gains and losses related to the derivative instruments are expected to be largely offset by gains and losses on the original underlying asset or liability. The Company does not use derivative financial instruments for speculative purposes.

The effects of derivative instruments on the Company’s condensed consolidated balance sheets as of December 25, 2010, June 26, 2010 and December 26, 2009 and on the Company’s income and other comprehensive income (OCI) for the three and six months ended December 25, 2010 and December 26, 2009 were as follows (amounts presented exclude any income tax effects):

Fair Values of Derivative Instruments in Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet

(Designated as (non)hedging instruments under ASC 815)

 

    

Asset Derivatives

 
    

Balance Sheet Location

   Fair Value  
          December 25,
2010
     June 26,
2010
     December 26,
2009
 

Hedging derivatives:

           

Foreign currency forward contracts

  

Other current assets

   $ 2,869       $ 51       $ 807   

Interest rate swap agreements

  

Other non-current assets

     2,150         —           —     
                             

Total hedging derivatives

      $ 5,019       $ 51       $ 807   
                             

Non-hedging derivatives:

           

Foreign currency forward contracts

  

Other current assets

   $ 244       $ 351       $ 340   
                             

Total non-hedging derivatives

      $ 244       $ 351       $ 340   
                             
    

Liability Derivatives

 
    

Balance Sheet Location

   Fair Value  
          December 25,
2010
     June 26,
2010
     December 26,
2009
 

Hedging derivatives:

           

Interest rate swap agreements

  

Accrued liabilities

   $ —         $ —         $ 925   

Foreign currency forward contracts

  

Accrued liabilities

     1,293         4,827         905   
                             

Total hedging derivatives

      $ 1,293       $ 4,827       $ 1,830   
                             

Non-hedging derivatives:

           

Foreign currency forward contracts

  

Accrued liabilities

   $ 29       $ 100       $ 90   
                             

Total non-hedging derivatives

      $ 29       $ 100       $ 90   
                             

 

-28-


Table of Contents

Effects of Derivative Instruments on Income and OCI for the three months ended December 25, 2010

 

Derivatives in ASC

815 Cash Flow

Hedging Relationships

   Amount of Gain
Recognized in OCI
on Derivative
(Effective Portion)
    

Location and Amount of

Gain/(Loss) Reclassified

from Accumulated OCI into

Income (Effective Portion)

   

Location and Amount of
Gain/(Loss) Recognized
in Income on Derivative
(Ineffective  Portion and
Amount Excluded from
Effectiveness Testing)

 

T-Locks

   $ —        

Interest, net

   $ 56         $ —     

Interest rate swap agreements

     2,150      

Interest, net

     251           —     

Foreign currency forward contracts

     55      

Net sales

     (249  

Net sales

     (24
     

Cost of sales

     (437  

Cost of sales

     130   
     

Interest, net

     14        
     

Other income (expense), net

     220        
                               

Total

   $ 2,205          $ (145      $ 106   
                               

Effects of Derivative Instruments on Income and OCI for the three months ended December 26, 2009

 

Derivatives in ASC

815 Cash Flow

Hedging

Relationships

   Amount of
Gain/(Loss)
Recognized in
OCI on Derivative
(Effective Portion)
   

Location and Amount of

Gain/(Loss) Reclassified

from Accumulated OCI into

Income (Effective Portion)

   

Location and Amount of
Loss Recognized in Income
on Derivative (Ineffective
Portion  and Amount
Excluded from Effectiveness

Testing)

 

Interest rate swap agreements

   $ 1,486     

Interest, net

   $ (1,135  

Other expense

   $ —     

Foreign currency forward contracts

     (511  

Net sales

     (300  

Cost of sales

     (2
    

Cost of sales

     724        
    

Interest, net

     15        
    

Other income (expense), net

     (242     
                              

Total

   $ 975         $ (938      $ (2
                              

 

Derivatives Not Designated as

Hedging Instruments under

ASC 815

  

Location of Gain/(Loss)

Recognized in Income on

Derivative

   Amount of Gain/(Loss)
Recognized in Income on
Derivative
 
          Second Quarter  
          2011     2010  

Foreign currency forward contracts

  

Interest, net

   $ (6   $ (31

Foreign currency forward contracts (1)

  

Other income (expense), net

     25        (90
                   

Total

      $ 19      $ (121
                   

 

-29-


Table of Contents
(1)

The net hedge result offsets the revaluation of the underlying balance sheet exposure, which is also recorded in Other expense.

Effects of Derivative Instruments on Income and OCI for the six months ended December 25, 2010

 

Derivatives in ASC

815 Cash Flow

Hedging

Relationships

   Amount of Gain
Recognized in OCI
on Derivative
(Effective Portion)
    

Location and Amount of

Gain/(Loss) Reclassified

from Accumulated OCI into

Income (Effective Portion)

   

Location and Amount of

Loss Recognized in

Income on Derivative

(Ineffective Portion and

Amount Excluded from

Effectiveness Testing)

 

T-Locks

   $ —        

Interest, net

   $ 112         $ —     

Interest rate swap agreements

     2,150      

Interest, net

     251        

Foreign currency forward contracts

     5,492      

Net sales

     (339  

Net sales

     (24
     

Cost of sales

     (1,523  

Cost of sales

     (3
     

Interest, net

     25        
     

Other income (expense), net

     1,714        
                               

Total

   $ 7,642          $ 240         $ (27
                               

Effects of Derivative Instruments on Income and OCI for the six months ended December 26, 2009

 

Derivatives in ASC

815 Cash Flow

Hedging

Relationships

   Amount of
Gain/(Loss)
Recognized  in
OCI on Derivative
(Effective Portion)
   

Location and Amount of

Gain/(Loss) Reclassified

from Accumulated OCI into

Income (Effective Portion)

   

Location and Amount of
Loss Recognized in Income
on Derivative (Ineffective

Portion and Amount
Excluded from Effectiveness

Testing)

 

Interest rate swap agreements

   $ 1,078     

Interest, net

   $ (2,699  

Other expense

   $ (1,100

Foreign currency forward contracts

     (69  

Net sales

     (561  

Cost of sales

     (37
    

Cost of sales

     1,182        
    

Interest, net

     34        
    

Other income (expense), net

     (5     
                              

Total

   $ 1,009         $ (2,049      $ (1,137
                              

 

-30-


Table of Contents

Derivatives Not Designated as

Hedging Instruments under

ASC 815

  

Location of Gain/(Loss)

Recognized in Income on

Derivative

   Amount of Gain/(Loss)
Recognized in  Income on
Derivative
 
          Six Months Ended  
          2011     2010  

Foreign currency forward contracts

  

Interest, net

   $ (9   $ (46

Foreign currency forward contracts (1)

  

Other income (expense), net

     (478     1,182   
                   

Total

      $ (487   $ 1,136   
                   

 

(1)

The net hedge result offsets the revaluation of the underlying balance sheet exposure, which is also recorded in Other expense.

NOTE 10 – SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY

The Company issued 96 and 536 shares related to the exercise and vesting of share-based compensation during the second quarter of fiscal 2011 and 2010, respectively. Year-to-date, the Company issued 767 and 1,077 shares related to share-based compensation in fiscal 2011 and 2010, respectively.

Prior to fiscal 2011, the Company had a common stock repurchase program. Purchases were made on the open market, subject to market conditions and were funded by available cash or borrowings. On February 1, 2008, the Board of Directors approved a plan to repurchase shares of common stock with a value up to $150,000. The Company completed purchases under this plan on December 16, 2009. All common stock repurchased by the Company becomes authorized but unissued stock and is available for reissuance in the future for general corporate purposes. During the second quarter of fiscal 2011, the Company repurchased 1 share of its common stock for $45 in private party transactions. During the second quarter of fiscal 2010, the Company repurchased 1,218 shares of its common stock for $45,518, of which 2 shares were repurchased in private party transactions. Year-to-date in fiscal 2011, the Company repurchased 141 shares of its common stock for $8,214, all of which were repurchased in private party transactions. Year-to-date in fiscal 2010, the Company repurchased 12,057 shares of its common stock for $70,804, of which 80 shares were repurchased in private party transactions.

NOTE 11 – COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

Comprehensive income is comprised of all changes in shareholders’ equity during the period other than from transactions with shareholders. Comprehensive income consisted of the following:

 

     Second Quarter     Year-to-Date  
     2011      2010     2011     2010  

Net income

   $ 90,167       $ 60,813      $ 164,542      $ 112,674   

Other comprehensive income (loss):

         

Change in fair value of derivative instruments, net of tax

     1,592         255        4,929        1,688   

Foreign currency translation adjustments

     12,119         1,146        44,251        15,358   

Change in fair value of investment securities, net of tax

     1,042         —          1,042        —     

Postretirement liability adjustments, net of tax

     48         (107     (203     (218
                                 

Comprehensive income

   $ 104,968       $ 62,107      $ 214,561      $ 129,502   
                                 

 

-31-


Table of Contents

NOTE 12 – INCOME TAXES

The effective tax rate on earnings from continuing operations was 26.5% and 32.9% for the second quarter of fiscal 2011 and 2010, respectively. The effective tax rate on income from continuing operations was 27.2% and 28.2% for the first six months of fiscal 2011 and 2010, respectively. Foreign source income from continuing operations before tax for the second quarter was 31% of pre-tax earnings in fiscal 2011, up from 19% in the same period of fiscal 2010. Foreign source income from continuing operations before tax for the first six months of fiscal 2011 was 30% of pre-tax earnings, down from 35% in the same period for fiscal 2010. Foreign source income is generally derived from jurisdictions with a lower tax rate than the U.S. statutory rate. The effective tax rate for the second quarter of fiscal 2011 included the impact of the newly enacted Tax Relief, Unemployment Insurance Reauthorization, and Job Creation Act of 2010 (the Act). Among other provisions, the Act provides for the restoration of the research and development tax credit, applied retroactively to January 1, 2010. Accordingly, tax expense in the second quarter of fiscal 2011 was reduced by approximately $1,820 to reflect the one-time impact of the retroactive application of the Act. The recorded effective tax rate for the first quarter of fiscal 2010 was reduced by $4,600 or 5.7% due to the statutory tax rate changes in Israel.

In July 2009, Israel lowered its statutory corporate tax rate as follows: 24% for 2010, 23% for 2011, 22% for 2012, 21% for 2013, 20% for 2014 and 18% for 2015 and thereafter. Subsequent to December 25, 2010, Israel enacted new tax legislation. The Company is currently analyzing the legislative change and at this time has not determined its impact.

The Company’s tax rate is subject to adjustment over the balance of the fiscal year due to, among other things, changes in revenue mix, unanticipated changes in applicable laws and changes in the jurisdictions in which the Company does business.

The total amount of unrecognized tax benefits was $103,994 and $72,348 as of December 25, 2010 and June 26, 2010, respectively. It is reasonably possible that the amount of unrecognized tax benefits may significantly change in the next twelve months. The Company is not able to reasonably estimate the changes to unrecognized tax benefits that will be required in future periods.

The total amount accrued for interest and penalties in the liability for uncertain tax positions was $17,655 and $14,430 as of December 25, 2010 and June 26, 2010, respectively.

NOTE 13 – COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

On March 11, 2009, a purported shareholder of the Company named Michael L. Warner filed a lawsuit in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York against the Company and certain of its officers and directors, including Joseph Papa and Judy Brown, among others. The plaintiff sought to represent a class of purchasers of the Company’s common stock during the period between November 6, 2008 and February 2, 2009. The complaint alleged violations of Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the Exchange Act). The plaintiff generally alleged that the Company misled investors by failing to disclose, prior to February 3, 2009, that certain auction rate securities held by the Company, totaling approximately $18,000 in par value (the ARS), had been purchased from Lehman Brothers Holdings, Inc. (Lehman). The plaintiff asserted that omission of the identity of Lehman as the seller of the ARS was material because after Lehman’s bankruptcy filing, on September 15, 2008, the Company allegedly became unable to look to Lehman to repurchase the ARS at a price near par value. The complaint sought unspecified damages and unspecified equitable or injunctive relief, along with costs and attorneys’ fees.

On June 15, 2009, the Court appointed several purported shareholders of the Company, namely CLAL Finance Batucha Investment Management, Ltd., The Phoenix Insurance Company, Ltd., Excellence Nessuah Mutual Funds Management, Ltd. and Excellence Nessuah Gemel & Pension, Ltd., as Co-Lead Plaintiffs. On July 31, 2009, these Co-Lead Plaintiffs filed an amended complaint. The amended complaint dropped all claims against the individual defendants other than Joseph Papa and Judy Brown, and added a “control person” claim under Section 20(a) of the Exchange Act against the members of the Company’s Audit Committee. The amended complaint asserts many of

 

-32-


Table of Contents

the same claims and allegations as the original pleading. It also alleges that the Company should have disclosed, prior to February 3, 2009, that Lehman had sold the ARS to the Company and had provided the allegedly inflated valuation of the ARS that the Company adopted in its Form 10-Q filing for the first quarter of fiscal 2009, which was filed with the SEC on November 6, 2008. The amended complaint also alleges that some portion of the write-down of the value of the ARS that the Company recognized in the second quarter of fiscal 2009 should have been taken in the prior quarter, immediately following Lehman’s bankruptcy filing. On September 28, 2009, the defendants filed a motion to dismiss all claims against all defendants. On September 30, 2010, the Court granted in part and denied in part the motion to dismiss. The Court dismissed the “control person” claims against the members of the Company’s Audit Committee, but denied the motion to dismiss as to the remaining claims and defendants. On October 29, 2010, the defendants filed a new motion to dismiss the amended complaint on the grounds that the Co-Lead Plaintiffs (who are the only plaintiffs named in the amended complaint) lack standing to sue under the U.S. securities laws following a recent decision of the United States Supreme Court holding that Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act does not apply extraterritorially to the claims of foreign investors who purchased or sold securities on foreign stock exchanges. The motion to dismiss is pending. On December 23, 2010, a shareholder named Harel Insurance, Ltd. (Harel) filed a motion to intervene as an additional named plaintiff. Although Harel is a non-U.S. investor, it claims to have purchased the Company’s common stock on a U.S. exchange. On January 10, 2011, the original plaintiff, Warner, filed a motion renewing his previously withdrawn motion to be appointed as Lead Plaintiff to replace the Co-Lead Plaintiffs. These motions are pending.

On June 2, 2009, a purported shareholder of the Company named Bill Drinkwine filed a purported shareholder derivative complaint in the Circuit Court of Allegan County, Michigan against a number of officers and directors of the Company, including certain of the officers and directors named as defendants in the federal securities suit described above, as well as others. Like the federal securities suit, the state court complaint alleged that the Company misled investors by failing to disclose, prior to February 3, 2009, that the ARS had been purchased from Lehman and allegedly “became worthless” when Lehman filed for bankruptcy. The complaint asserted that the officer and director defendants violated their fiduciary duties to the Company by selling shares of their personally-held Perrigo stock during the five-month period between Lehman’s bankruptcy filing and the Company’s February 3, 2009 disclosure of the write-down of the value of the ARS. The complaint sought to “recover” for Perrigo the proceeds received by the officer and director defendants from such stock sales.

Prior to filing the suit, on March 3, 2009, Mr. Drinkwine made a demand on the Company’s Board of Directors that Perrigo bring the suit directly against the accused officers and directors. In response to that demand, the Perrigo Board appointed a committee of all independent, disinterested directors (as defined by the Michigan Business Corporation Act) to investigate Mr. Drinkwine’s allegations. The committee retained independent counsel to assist it in that investigation. The committee and its counsel conducted an investigation and concluded that Mr. Drinkwine’s allegations were without merit and, consequently, that it would not be in Perrigo’s best interests for the suit to go forward. Based on the findings of that investigation, on August 24, 2009, the Company filed a motion to dismiss the complaint pursuant to Section 495 of the Michigan Business Corporation Act, which provides that when a committee of all independent, disinterested directors makes a good faith determination, based upon a reasonable investigation, that the maintenance of a derivative suit would not be in the best interests of the corporation, the court shall dismiss the derivative proceeding. On November 3, 2010, the Court granted the Company’s dismissal motion and terminated the case. Mr. Drinkwine did not appeal that ruling.

In March and June of 2007, lawsuits were filed by three separate groups against both the State of Israel and the Council of Ramat Hovav in connection with waste disposal and pollution from several companies, including the Company, that have operations in the Ramat Hovav region of Israel. These lawsuits were subsequently consolidated into a single proceeding in the District Court of Beer-Sheva. The Council of Ramat Hovav in June 2008, and the State of Israel, in November 2008, asserted third party claims against several companies, including the Company. The pleadings allege a variety of personal injuries arising out of the alleged environmental pollution. Neither the plaintiffs nor the third party claimants were required to specify a maximum amount of damages, but the pleadings allege damages in excess of $72,500, subject to foreign currency fluctuations between the Israeli shekel and the U.S. dollar. While the Company intends to vigorously defend against these claims, the Company cannot reasonably predict at this time, the outcome or the liability, if any, associated with these claims.

 

-33-


Table of Contents

In addition to the foregoing discussion, the Company has pending certain other legal actions and claims incurred in the normal course of business. The Company believes that it has meritorious defenses to these lawsuits and/or is covered by insurance and is actively pursuing the defense thereof. The Company believes the resolution of all of these matters will not have a material adverse effect on its financial condition and results of operations as reported in the accompanying consolidated financial statements. However, depending on the amount and timing of an unfavorable resolution of these lawsuits, the Company’s future results of operations or cash flow could be materially impacted in a particular period.

NOTE 14 – SEGMENT INFORMATION

The Company has four reportable segments, aligned primarily by type of product: Consumer Healthcare, Nutritionals, Rx Pharmaceuticals and API, along with an Other category. As discussed in Note 1, following the purchase of PBM, in the first quarter of fiscal 2011, the Company realigned and expanded its reportable segments to include its Nutritionals segment, representing infant formulas and other nutritional products. As discussed in Note 3, beginning in the third quarter of fiscal 2009, the operating results of the Company’s former Israel Consumer Products operating segment are reported as discontinued operations in the Company’s condensed consolidated statements of income and are not included in the table below for all periods presented. The accounting policies of each segment are the same as those described in the summary of significant accounting policies set forth in Note 1. The majority of corporate expenses, which generally represent shared services, are charged to operating segments as part of a corporate allocation. Unallocated expenses relate to certain corporate services that are not allocated to the segments.

 

     Consumer
Healthcare
     Nutritionals      Rx
Pharmaceuticals
     API      Other     Unallocated
expenses
    Total  

Second Quarter 2011

                  

Net sales

   $ 429,996       $ 133,458       $ 97,534       $ 40,333       $ 16,194        —        $ 717,515   

Operating income (loss)

   $ 75,394       $ 20,163       $ 33,195       $ 10,032       $ (8   $ (6,537   $ 132,239   

Amortization of intangibles

   $ 1,882       $ 5,792       $ 2,749       $ 516       $ 436        —        $ 11,375   

Total assets

   $ 1,139,094       $ 984,018       $ 412,034       $ 269,561       $ 123,771        —        $ 2,928,478   

Second Quarter 2010

                  

Net sales

   $ 417,001       $ 61,010       $ 56,761       $ 35,272       $ 12,381        —        $ 582,425   

Operating income (loss)

   $ 84,456       $ 2,597       $ 18,217       $ 4,979       $ (804   $ (11,412   $ 98,033   

Amortization of intangibles

   $ 1,618       $ 449       $ 2,897       $ 442       $ 361        —        $ 5,767   

Total assets

   $ 1,455,135       $ 175,200       $ 411,129       $ 248,402       $ 98,904        —        $ 2,388,770   

 

-34-


Table of Contents
     Consumer
Healthcare
     Nutritionals      Rx
Pharmaceuticals
     API      Other     Unallocated
expenses
    Total  

Year-to-Date 2011

                  

Net sales

   $ 826,100       $ 256,142       $ 166,867       $ 77,694       $ 32,034        —        $ 1,358,837   

Operating income

   $ 146,713       $ 38,242       $ 50,950       $ 20,355       $ 797      $ (13,051   $ 244,006   

Amortization of intangibles

   $ 3,996       $ 11,593       $ 5,208       $ 1,008       $ 857        —        $ 22,662   

Year-to-Date 2010

                  

Net sales

   $ 797,822       $ 116,802       $ 103,892       $ 68,192       $ 24,050        —        $ 1,110,758   

Operating income (loss)

   $ 158,873       $ 7       $ 18,277       $ 8,928       $ (516   $ (15,407   $ 170,162   

Amortization of intangibles

   $ 2,879       $ 899       $ 5,692       $ 972       $ 617        —        $ 11,059   

NOTE 15 – RESTRUCTURING

Florida

In the third quarter of fiscal 2010, due to an evaluation of the current capacity utilization of its U.S. warehousing facilities, the Company made the decision to close its Florida warehousing facility. In connection with this closure, it was determined that the carrying value of certain fixed assets at the location was not fully recoverable. As a result, the Company incurred a non-cash impairment charge of $155 in its Nutritionals segment in the third quarter of fiscal 2010 to reflect the difference between carrying value and the estimated fair value of the affected assets. In addition, the Company incurred charges of $544 related to lease termination costs. The Company does not expect to incur any additional charges related to this restructuring plan. The activity of the lease termination costs is detailed in the following table:

 

     Fiscal 2010 Restructuring
Lease Termination
 

Balance at March 27, 2010

   $ 544   

Payments

     (159
        

Balance at June 26, 2010

     385   

Payments

     (241
        

Balance at December 25, 2010

   $ 144   
        

Germany

In the fourth quarter of fiscal 2009, the Company determined that its German API facility was no longer competitive from a global cost position. At that time, the Company did not anticipate that there would be a viable market for the sale of this facility and related operations, and accordingly, the Company planned to cease all operations at the facility during the first quarter of fiscal 2011. In connection with the planned closure of this facility, it was determined that the carrying value of certain fixed assets at the location was not fully recoverable. As a result, the Company incurred a non-cash impairment charge in its API segment of $5,735 in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2009 to reflect the difference between carrying value and the estimated fair value, based on quoted market prices, of the affected assets. An additional charge of $2,160 was recorded in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2009 related to the removal of fixed assets from the facility for transfer and sale. The Company also recorded a charge of $6,752 related to employee termination benefits for 73 employees.

During the third quarter of fiscal 2010, however, the Company was approached by an external party who offered to buy the German API facility and related operations from the Company. As a result of the third-party offer, subsequent to the third quarter of fiscal 2010, the Company signed an agreement and closed the transaction with the third-party buyer for the sale of the German API facility and related operations.

 

-35-


Table of Contents

Due to the change in its original restructuring plan, in the third quarter of fiscal 2010, the Company reversed $6,013 of certain charges it had recognized in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2009 when the restructuring plan was initially put in place. The Company reversed the $2,160 charge related to the removal of fixed assets from the facility, as well as a $3,852 charge related to employee termination benefits, because these items became the responsibility of the buyer. Of the remaining $2,900 charge related to employee termination benefits, no amounts had been paid out as of December 25, 2010. In addition, given that, as of the end of the third quarter of fiscal 2010, the German API facility and its related operations had not yet been sold but met the held for sale criteria, in accordance with ASC Topic 360, the Company recorded the assets at fair value less the cost to sell. As a result, the Company incurred a $12,788 charge in its API segment in the third quarter of fiscal 2010. In the fourth quarter of fiscal 2010, the Company incurred an additional $2,049 restructuring charge upon completion of the sale.

 

-36-


Table of Contents
Item 2.

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

SECOND QUARTER FISCAL YEARS 2011 AND 2010

(in thousands, except per share amounts)

OVERVIEW

Perrigo Company (the “Company”) traces its history back to 1887. What was started as a small local proprietor selling medicinals to regional grocers has evolved into a leading global pharmaceutical company that manufactures and distributes more than 40 billion oral solid doses and several hundred million liquid doses, as well as dozens of other product forms, each year. The Company’s mission is to offer uncompromised “quality, affordable healthcare products”, and it does so across a wide variety of product categories primarily in the U.S., U.K., Mexico, Israel and Australia as well as in certain other markets throughout the world, including Canada, China and Latin America.

Segments – The Consumer Healthcare segment is the world’s largest store brand manufacturer of over-the-counter (OTC) pharmaceutical products. This business markets products that are comparable in quality and effectiveness to national brand products. The cost to the retailer of a store brand product is significantly lower than that of a comparable nationally advertised brand-name product. The retailer, therefore, can price a store brand product below the competing national brand product yet realize a greater profit margin. Generally, the retailers’ dollar profit per unit of store brand product is greater than the dollar profit per unit of the comparable national brand product. The consumer benefits by receiving a high quality product at a price below a comparable national brand product. The Company estimates that its business model saves consumers approximately $1,100,000 annually in their healthcare spending. The Company, one of the original architects of private label pharmaceuticals, is the market leader for consumer healthcare products in many of the geographies where it currently competes - the U.S., U.K. and Mexico. Currently, store brand private label OTC products represent approximately 30% of the total retail dollar value of the categories in which the Company competes. This market share has grown in recent years as new products, retailer efforts and economic events have directed consumers to the value of store brand product offerings.

In the first quarter of fiscal 2011, the Company realigned and expanded its reportable segments to include its Nutritionals segment, representing infant formulas and other nutritional products. This realignment followed the Company’s acquisition, in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2010, of PBM Holdings, Inc. (PBM), the leading manufacturer and distributor of store brand infant formulas, pediatric nutritionals and baby foods sold by leading retailers in the mass, club, grocery and drug channels in the U.S., Canada, Mexico and China. This segment structure is consistent with the way management makes operating decisions and manages the growth and profitability of the Company’s business. As a result of the change in segment reporting, all historical information has been reclassified to conform to the new presentation.

The Nutritionals segment manufactures, markets and distributes infant formula products, infant and toddler foods, vitamin, mineral and dietary supplement (VMS) products, and oral electrolyte solution products to retailers and consumers in the U.S., Canada, Mexico and China. Similar to the Consumer Healthcare segment, this business markets products that are comparable in quality and effectiveness to the national brand products. The cost to the retailer of a store brand product is significantly lower than that of a comparable nationally advertised brand-name product. The retailer, therefore, can price a store brand product below the competing national brand product yet realize a greater profit margin. All infant formulas sold in the U.S. are subject to the same regulations governing manufacturing and ingredients per the Infant Formula Act. Store brands, which are value priced and offer substantial savings to consumers, must meet the same U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) nutritional requirements as all the major brands.

The Rx Pharmaceuticals segment develops, manufactures and markets a portfolio of generic prescription drugs in the U.S. The Company defines this portfolio as “extended topical” in nature as it encompasses a broad array of topicals including creams, ointments, lotions, gels, shampoos, foams, suppositories, sprays, liquids, suspensions and solutions. The strategy in the Rx Pharmaceuticals segment is to be the first to market with those new products

 

-37-


Table of Contents

that have more difficult to develop formulations and therefore are exposed to less competition. In addition, the Rx Pharmaceuticals segment offers OTC products through the prescription channel (referred to as “ORx®”). ORx® is a term used to describe OTC products that are available for pharmacy fulfillment and healthcare reimbursement when prescribed by a physician. The Company offers over 200 ORx® products that are reimbursable through many health plans, Medicaid and Medicare programs. When prescribed by a doctor or other health care professional, ORx® products offer consumers safe and effective remedies that provide an affordable alternative to higher out-of-pocket costs of traditional OTC products. The Company’s ORx® strategy is to set up and register OTC products for reimbursement through public and private health plans, as well as leverage its portfolio and pipeline of OTC products for generic substitution when appropriate.

The API segment develops, manufactures and markets active pharmaceutical ingredients (API) used worldwide by the generic drug industry and branded pharmaceutical companies. The strategy of the API segment is to focus development efforts on the synthesis of less common molecules for its customers, as well as for the more complex products within the Consumer Healthcare and Rx Pharmaceuticals development pipelines. This segment is undergoing a strategic platform transformation, moving certain production from Israel to the newly acquired API manufacturing facility in India to allow for lower cost production and to create space for other, more complex production in Israel. The fiscal 2010 sale of the Company’s facility in Germany also supports this footprint change.

In addition to general management and strategic leadership, each business segment has its own sales and marketing teams focused on servicing the specific requirements of its customer base. All of these business segments share Research and Development (R&D), Supply Chain, Information Technology, Finance, Human Resources, Legal and Quality services, all of which are directed out of the Company’s headquarters in Allegan, Michigan.

Over recent years, the Company has been executing a strategy designed to expand its product offering through both advanced R&D and acquisitions and to reach new healthcare consumers through entry into new markets. This strategy is accomplished by investing in and continually improving all aspects of its five strategic pillars: high quality, superior customer service, leading innovation, best cost and empowered people. The concentration of common shared service activities around the world and development of centers of excellence in R&D have played an important role in ensuring the consistency and quality of the Company’s five strategic pillars.

Principles of Consolidation – The condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and all majority owned subsidiaries. All material intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated in consolidation. Prior to June 27, 2010, the Company’s consolidated results of operations and financial position included the financial results of its U.K., Mexico, Germany and Israel subsidiaries on a twelve-month period ending in May, resulting in a one-month reporting lag when compared to the remainder of the Company. Starting June 27, 2010, the reporting year-end of these foreign operations was changed from May to June. The previously existing one-month reporting lag was eliminated as it was no longer required to achieve a timely consolidation due to the Company’s investments in technology, ERP systems and personnel to enhance its financial statement close process. Accordingly, the Company’s financial statements for periods prior to fiscal 2011 have been changed to reflect the period-specific effects of applying this change in accounting principle. This change resulted in a cumulative effect of an accounting change of $118, net of income tax effect, to retained earnings as of June 28, 2009. The impact of this change in accounting principle to eliminate the one-month lag for foreign subsidiaries is summarized in Note 1 of the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

Seasonality – The Company’s sales of OTC pharmaceutical products are subject to the seasonal demands for cough/cold/flu and allergy products. Accordingly, operating results for the first half of fiscal 2011 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the second half of the year.

Current Year Results – Net sales from continuing operations for the second quarter of fiscal 2011 were $717,515, an increase of 23% over fiscal 2010. The increase was driven primarily by approximately $93,000 of net sales attributable to the acquisitions of PBM and Orion Laboratories Pty Ltd. (Orion) and included consolidated new product sales of $63,000. Gross profit was $249,500, an increase of 26% over fiscal 2010. The gross profit percentage in

 

-38-


Table of Contents

the second quarter of fiscal 2011 was 34.8%, as compared to 33.9% last year. Operating expenses in the second quarter of fiscal 2011 were $117,261, an increase of 18% over fiscal 2010. As a percentage of net sales, operating expenses were 16.3%, down from 17.1% in the second quarter of fiscal 2010. Income from continuing operations was $89,779, an increase of 43% over fiscal 2010. Net income was $90,167, an increase of 48% over fiscal 2010.

Net sales for the first half of fiscal 2011 were $1,358,837, an increase of 22% over fiscal 2010. The increase was driven primarily by approximately $175,500 of net sales attributable to the acquisitions of PBM and Orion and included consolidated new product sales of $111,600. Gross profit was $463,454, up 28% over fiscal 2010. The gross profit percentage in the first half of fiscal 2011 was 34.1%, as compared to 32.5% last year. Operating expenses were $219,448, an increase of 24% over fiscal 2010. As a percentage of net sales, operating expenses were slightly lower than fiscal 2010. Income from continuing operations was $163,457, an increase of 44% from fiscal 2010. Net income was $164,542, an increase of 46% over fiscal 2010.

Growth Strategy and Strategic Transactions

Management expects to continue to grow the Company both organically and inorganically. The Company continually reinvests in its own R&D pipeline and works with partners as necessary to strive to be first to market with new products. Recent years have seen strong organic growth as a series of very successful new products have been launched in Consumer Healthcare. Inorganic growth is expected to be achieved through continued expansion into adjacent products, product categories, and channels, as well as into new geographic markets. While ever-conscious of the challenges associated with the current economic environment, the Company continues to identify opportunities to grow and at the same time position itself to address the uncertainties that lie ahead.

Strategic Evaluations and Transformations

The Company’s management evaluates business performance using a Return on Invested Capital (ROIC) metric. This includes evaluating the performance of business segments, manufacturing locations, product categories and capital projects. Business segments are expected to meet or exceed the Company’s weighted average cost of capital (WACC) each year. All potential acquisition targets are evaluated on whether they have the capacity to deliver an ROIC in excess of 2 to 2.5 percentage points over the Company’s WACC within three years. Capital expenditures and large projects are required to demonstrate that they will contribute positively to ROIC in excess of the Company’s WACC.

Events Impacting Future Results

On June 29, 2010, the Company announced that it had acquired the exclusive sales and distribution rights to certain OTC store brand products that are generic equivalents of Allegra® and Allegra D-12® from Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. (Teva). Teva had previously settled its patent litigation with the brand (Sanofi Aventis) and obtained a license to market these products. On January 25, 2011, Sanofi Aventis announced that the FDA had approved the switch of its Allegra® line of products from an Rx to OTC marketing authorization. Based on FDA precedent with other switches within this therapeutic class of products, the Company does not anticipate that Sanofi Aventis will be granted any period of regulatory exclusivity. The Company’s partner, Teva, is seeking the necessary OTC approvals from the FDA to enable the launch of fexofenadine 60mg and 180mg tablets, and the fexofenadine/pseudoephedrine 12-hour product. While it is impossible to predict with certainty, the Company estimates that Teva could obtain the necessary OTC approvals sometime between March and May 2011 and that the Company could launch its store brand equivalent products into the market shortly after this approval. As the brand product has not yet been launched as an OTC product and the related OTC market has not yet formed, it is not yet possible to estimate what impact the Company’s eventual launch of this product will have on its financial results of operations.

Subsequent to the end of the Company’s second fiscal quarter, on January 20, 2011, the Company announced that it had signed a definitive agreement to acquire substantially all of the assets of privately-held Paddock Laboratories, Inc. (Paddock) for approximately $540,000 in cash. As of the end of the second quarter of fiscal 2011, the Company incurred approximately $1,300 of acquisition costs, which were expensed in operations in the second quarter of fiscal 2011. Headquartered in Minneapolis, Minnesota, Paddock is a manufacturer and marketer of generic Rx pharmaceutical products. The acquisition, which is expected to be completed in the Company’s fourth quarter of fiscal 2011, will expand the Company’s generic Rx extended topical product offering, pipeline and scale and is expected to add over $200,000 in sales in fiscal 2012.

Over the past several years, the Company has been developing the API temozolomide for various finished dose partners in several global markets. In the third quarter of fiscal 2010, the Company launched temozolomide into the European market. With respect to the U.S. temozolomide market, on February 2, 2010, the Company announced that it will exclusively supply Teva with the API for the generic version of Temodar® (temozolomide) in the U.S. market. Teva will manufacture, market and distribute the product in the U.S., and the Company will share equally with Teva in the profitability of the product sold. Teva was the first company to file an Abbreviated New Drug Application (ANDA) that contained a Paragraph IV certification for Temodar® and is eligible to receive 180-day Hatch-Waxman statutory exclusivity to market this product in the U.S. On January 26, 2010, the United States District Court for the District of Delaware held that the patent protecting temozolomide was unenforceable. Merck appealed the ruling and on November 9, 2010, the appeals court reversed the trial decision,

 

-39-


Table of Contents

preventing the launch of the Teva product. Teva has filed a petition for the entire appeals court to rehear the case, and the court has not yet ruled on whether to rehear the case. On March 1, 2010, the FDA granted final approval to the Teva ANDA. Teva, which will control the launch and is managing the litigation, has not yet determined a U.S. launch date. In addition, by agreement reached between Teva and Merck, Teva will not be able to launch the product until August 2013, except in limited circumstances. The Company expects its share in the profits of the product could have a material positive impact on its operating results; however, the magnitude and timing of the profits the Company could realize are uncertain and are subject to factors beyond the Company’s control, including, but not limited to, the timing of the product launch date by Teva in the U.S. and any resolution of the litigation.

Beginning in the third quarter of fiscal 2010, a branded competitor in the OTC market began to experience periodic interruptions of distribution of certain of their products in the adult and pediatric analgesic categories. These interruptions have included periods of time where supply of certain products has been suspended altogether. Due to this situation, which has continued through the second quarter of fiscal 2011, the Company experienced an increase in sales of certain adult and pediatric analgesic products, which have had a positive impact on the Consumer Healthcare segment’s sales and results of operations. To the extent that this key competitor remains absent from the market for the remainder of fiscal 2011, this could continue to benefit the Company’s Consumer Healthcare sales and results of operations. At this time, the Company cannot predict when this competitor will make a full return to the market.

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Consumer Healthcare

 

     Second Quarter     Year-to-Date  
     2011     2010     2011     2010  

Net sales

   $ 429,996      $ 417,001      $ 826,100      $ 797,822   

Gross profit

   $ 137,214      $ 142,136      $ 262,806      $ 265,073   

Gross profit %

     31.9     34.1     31.8     33.2

Operating expenses

   $ 61,820      $ 57,680      $ 116,093      $ 106,200   

Operating expenses %

     14.4     13.8     14.1     13.3

Operating income

   $ 75,394      $ 84,456      $ 146,713      $ 158,873   

Operating income %

     17.5     20.3     17.8     19.9

Net Sales

Second quarter net sales for fiscal 2011 increased 3% or $12,995 compared to fiscal 2010. The increase was due primarily to an increase in sales of existing products of approximately $24,000 in the analgesics, smoking cessation and feminine hygiene categories, along with new product sales of approximately $9,900, primarily in the gastrointestinal, cough/cold and feminine hygiene categories. In addition, second quarter fiscal 2011 net sales attributable to the acquisition of Orion were approximately $7,000. These combined increases were partially offset by a decline of $27,000 in sales of existing products in the cough/cold, gastrointestinal and contract manufacturing categories. The declines in the cough/cold and contract manufacturing categories were driven primarily by the timing of the H1N1 peak season relative to last year, along with throughput pressures in manufacturing. Sales of existing products in the U.K. and Mexico declined by approximately $300 due to unfavorable changes in foreign currency exchange rates.

Year-to-date net sales for fiscal 2011 increased 4% or $28,278 compared to fiscal 2010. The increase was due primarily to an increase in sales of existing products of approximately $31,000 in the analgesics and feminine hygiene categories, along with new product sales of approximately $27,100, primarily in the gastrointestinal, smoking cessation, cough/cold and feminine hygiene categories. In addition, year-to-date fiscal 2011 net sales attributable to the acquisition of Orion were approximately $14,300. These combined increases were partially offset by a decline of $37,000 in sales of existing products in the cough/cold, gastrointestinal, smoking cessation and contract manufacturing categories. The declines in the cough/cold and contract manufacturing categories were driven primarily by the timing of the H1N1 peak season relative to last year, along with throughput pressures in manufacturing. International sales of existing products declined by approximately $5,200.

 

-40-


Table of Contents

Gross Profit

Second quarter gross profit for fiscal 2011 decreased 3% or $4,922 compared to fiscal 2010. The decrease was due primarily to a decline in gross profit related to an incremental investment in quality spending. This decline was partially offset by higher gross profit on new product sales and the incremental gross profit attributable to the Orion acquisition. The gross profit percentage decreased 220 basis points in the second quarter of fiscal 2011 compared to fiscal 2010 due primarily to the incremental investment in quality spending.

Year-to-date gross profit for fiscal 2011 decreased 1% or $2,267 compared to fiscal 2010. The decrease was due primarily to a decline in gross profit related to an incremental investment in quality spending. This decline was partially offset by higher gross profit on new product sales and the incremental gross profit attributable to the Orion acquisition. The gross profit percentage decreased 140 basis points in the first half of fiscal 2011 compared to fiscal 2010 due primarily to the incremental investment in quality spending.

Operating Expenses

Second quarter operating expenses for fiscal 2011 increased 7% or $4,140 compared to fiscal 2010. The increase was related primarily to an increase in selling expenses of $1,800 and research and development costs of $1,500. Selling expenses increased due primarily to higher spending on sales and marketing promotions, along with the incremental selling expenses of Orion. The increase in research and development costs was due primarily to the timing of clinical trials and the incremental research and development costs of Orion.

Year-to-date operating expenses for fiscal 2011 increased 9% or $9,893 compared to fiscal 2010. The increase was related primarily to an increase in administrative expenses of $4,900 and selling expenses of $4,900. The increase in administrative expenses was driven primarily by an increase in employee-related costs, along with the incremental administrative expenses of Orion. Selling expenses increased due primarily to higher spending on sales and marketing promotions, along with the incremental selling expenses of Orion. These increases in administrative costs and selling expenses were partially offset by a decrease in research and development costs associated with the timing of clinical trials.

Nutritionals

 

     Second Quarter     Year-to-Date  
     2011     2010     2011     2010  

Net sales

   $ 133,458      $ 61,010      $ 256,142      $ 116,802   

Gross profit

   $ 45,522      $ 9,510      $ 83,912      $ 12,675   

Gross profit %

     34.1     15.6     32.8     10.9

Operating expenses

   $ 25,359      $ 6,913      $ 45,670      $ 12,668   

Operating expenses %

     19.0     11.3     17.8     10.8

Operating income

   $ 20,163      $ 2,597      $ 38,242      $ 7   

Operating income %

     15.1     4.3     14.9     0.0

Net Sales

Second quarter net sales for fiscal 2011 increased 119% or $72,448 compared to fiscal 2010. The increase was due primarily to additional sales of approximately $86,000 attributable to the fiscal 2010 acquisition of PBM. In addition, new product sales in the VMS category were approximately $1,800. These combined increases were partially offset by a decline of $15,300 in sales from existing products in the VMS category due primarily to the continued efforts around SKU rationalization. During the first quarter of fiscal 2011, one of the Company’s key competitors within the infant formula product category experienced a serious quality issue that resulted in the removal of certain of this competitor’s products from the market. As a result of this issue, the Company experienced a moderate increase in second quarter fiscal 2011 net sales within the Nutritionals segment of approximately $12,000, but does not currently expect the increase to be significant beyond the second quarter.

 

-41-


Table of Contents

Year-to-date net sales for fiscal 2011 increased 119% or $139,340 compared to fiscal 2010. The increase was due primarily to additional sales of approximately $161,200 attributable to the fiscal 2010 acquisition of PBM. In addition, new product sales in the VMS category were approximately $3,200. These combined increases were partially offset by a decline of $25,100 in sales from existing products in the VMS category due primarily to the continued efforts around SKU rationalization.

Gross Profit

Second quarter gross profit for fiscal 2011 increased $36,012 over fiscal 2010 gross profit of $9,510. The substantial increase resulted primarily from the incremental gross profit attributable to the fiscal 2010 acquisition of PBM. In addition, gross profit from the VMS category improved by approximately $2,000 as a result of improvements in operational efficiencies and lower material costs. The large increase in the second quarter fiscal 2011 gross profit percentage compared to the second quarter of fiscal 2010 was due primarily to the acquisition of PBM, along with the operational improvements within the VMS category.

Year-to-date gross profit for fiscal 2011 increased $71,237 over fiscal 2010 gross profit of $12,675. The substantial increase resulted primarily from the incremental gross profit attributable to the fiscal 2010 acquisition of PBM. In addition, gross profit from the VMS category improved by approximately $6,000 as a result of improvements in operational efficiencies and lower material costs. The large increase in the first half of fiscal 2011 gross profit percentage compared to the first half of fiscal 2010 was due primarily to the acquisition of PBM, along with the operational improvements within the VMS category.

Operating Expenses

Second quarter operating expenses for fiscal 2011 increased 267% or $18,446 compared to fiscal 2010. Year-to-date operating expenses for fiscal 2011 increased 261% or $33,002 compared to fiscal 2010. The substantial increase in both the second quarter and year-to-date for fiscal 2011 resulted from operating expenses attributable to PBM.

Rx Pharmaceuticals

 

     Second Quarter     Year-to-Date  
     2011     2010     2011     2010  

Net sales

   $ 97,534      $ 56,761      $ 166,867      $ 103,892   

Gross profit

   $ 44,256      $ 28,053      $ 72,028      $ 50,452   

Gross profit %

     45.4     49.4     43.2     48.6

Operating expenses

   $ 11,061      $ 9,836      $ 21,078      $ 32,175   

Operating expenses %

     11.3     17.3     12.6     31.0

Operating income

   $ 33,195      $ 18,217      $ 50,950      $ 18,277   

Operating income %

     34.0     32.1     30.5     17.6

Net Sales

Second quarter net sales for fiscal 2011 increased 72% or $40,773 compared to fiscal 2010. This increase was due primarily to new product sales of $31,400, a lower degree of pricing pressures as compared to prior year, and an increase in sales volumes on the Company’s existing portfolio of products of approximately $4,500. New product sales in the second quarter of fiscal 2011 included sales of the generic version of Aldara® cream through the Company’s partnership agreement with Graceway Pharmaceuticals, LLC, sales of the generic version of Xyzal® tablets through the Company’s partnership agreement with Synthon and sales of the generic version of Evoclin® through the Company’s partnership with Cobrek Pharmaceuticals.

 

-42-


Table of Contents

Year-to-date net sales for fiscal 2011 increased 61% or $62,975 compared to fiscal 2010. This increase was due primarily to new product sales of $48,400, along with an increase in sales volumes on the Company’s existing portfolio of products of approximately $9,200. This increase was also due to a lower degree of pricing pressures as compared to prior year.

Gross Profit

Second quarter gross profit for fiscal 2011 increased 58% or $16,203 compared to fiscal 2010. This increase was due primarily to gross profit of $9,300 attributable to new product sales, along with a lower degree of pricing pressures as compared to prior year. The gross profit percentage decreased 400 basis points in the second quarter of fiscal 2011 compared to fiscal 2010 as a result of the lower gross profit percentage associated with sales of the authorized generic of Aldara® discussed above.

Year-to-date gross profit for fiscal 2011 increased 43% or $21,576 compared to fiscal 2010. This increase was due primarily to gross profit of $13,300 attributable to new product sales, a lower degree of pricing pressures as compared to prior year, as well as gross profit from higher sales volumes of existing products. The gross profit percentage decreased 540 basis points in the first half of fiscal 2011 compared to fiscal 2010 as a result of the lower gross profit percentage associated with sales of the authorized generic of Aldara® discussed above.

Operating Expenses

Second quarter operating expenses for fiscal 2011 increased 12% or $1,225 compared to fiscal 2010. The increase was due primarily to higher research and development costs associated with the timing of clinical studies.

Year-to-date operating expenses for fiscal 2011 decreased 34% or $11,097 compared to fiscal 2010 due primarily to a decrease in research and development costs of approximately $12,000, slightly offset by an increase in selling and administration costs of approximately $700. The decrease in research and development expenses was due primarily to the absence of the $14,000 write-off of in-process research and development as a result of acquiring an ANDA from KV Pharmaceutical in the first quarter of fiscal 2010, offset slightly by higher costs associated with the timing of clinical studies. The slight increase in selling and administration costs was driven by higher employee-related expenses.

API

 

     Second Quarter     Year-to-Date  
     2011     2010     2011     2010  

Net sales

   $ 40,333      $ 35,272      $ 77,694      $ 68,192   

Gross profit

   $ 17,553      $ 14,222      $ 34,334      $ 24,980   

Gross profit %

     43.5     40.3     44.2     36.6

Operating expenses

   $ 7,521      $ 9,243      $ 13,979      $ 16,052   

Operating expenses %

     18.6     26.2     18.0     23.5

Operating income

   $ 10,032      $ 4,979      $ 20,355      $ 8,928   

Operating income %

     24.9     14.1     26.2     13.1

 

-43-


Table of Contents

Net Sales

Second quarter net sales for fiscal 2011 increased 14% or $5,061 compared to fiscal 2010. This increase was due primarily to new product sales of $17,300 partially offset by a decline of approximately $10,600 in sales of existing products, along with a decrease of $1,700 resulting from unfavorable changes in foreign currency exchange rates. New product sales in the second quarter of fiscal 2011 were driven primarily by sales of temozolomide to the European market. The net sales of API are highly dependent on the level of competition in the marketplace for a specific material and the variable ordering patterns of customers on a quarter-over-quarter basis.

Year-to-date net sales for fiscal 2011 increased 14% or $9,502 compared to fiscal 2010. This increase was due primarily to new product sales of $26,500, partially offset by decreased sales volumes of existing products of approximately $13,300. This increase was also partially offset by a decrease of $3,700 due to unfavorable changes in foreign currency exchange rates.

Gross Profit

Second quarter gross profit for fiscal 2011 increased 23% or $3,331 compared to fiscal 2010 due primarily to the gross profit attributable to new product sales, partially offset by a decrease in sales volumes of existing products, along with a decrease of $1,600 resulting from unfavorable changes in foreign currency exchange rates.

Year-to-date gross profit for fiscal 2010 increased 37% or $9,354 compared to fiscal 2010. This increase was due primarily to the gross profit attributable to new product sales, partially offset by a decrease in sales volumes of existing products, along with a decrease of $3,000 resulting from unfavorable changes in foreign currency exchange rates. The gross profit percentage increased 760 basis points in the first half of fiscal 2011 compared to the first half of fiscal 2010 due primarily to the favorable contribution of new product sales.

Operating Expenses

Second quarter operating expenses for fiscal 2011 decreased 19% or $1,722 compared to fiscal 2010. Year-to-date operating expenses for fiscal 2011 decreased 13% or $2,073 compared to fiscal 2010. The second quarter and year-to-date decreases in fiscal 2011 were due primarily to decreased administrative costs as a result of the fiscal 2010 sale of the Company’s facility in Germany.

Other

The Other category consists of the Company’s Israel Pharmaceutical and Diagnostic Products operating segment, which does not individually meet the quantitative thresholds required to be a reportable segment.

 

     Second Quarter     Year-to-Date  
     2011     2010     2011     2010  

Net sales

   $ 16,194      $ 12,381      $ 32,034      $ 24,050   

Gross profit

   $ 4,955      $ 3,704      $ 10,374      $ 7,657   

Gross profit %

     30.6     29.9     32.4     31.8

Operating expenses

   $ 4,963      $ 4,508      $ 9,577      $ 8,173   

Operating expenses %

     30.6     36.4     29.9     34.0

Operating (loss) income

   $ (8   $ (804   $ 797      $ (516

Operating (loss) income %

     (0.0 %)      (6.5 %)      2.5     (2.1 %) 

 

-44-


Table of Contents

Net Sales

Second quarter net sales for fiscal 2011 increased 31% or $3,813 compared to fiscal 2010. This increase was driven primarily by new product sales of $2,600, along with a $1,800 increase in sales of existing products. These increases were offset slightly by a decrease of $500 due to unfavorable changes in foreign currency exchange rates.

Year-to-date net sales for fiscal 2011 increased 33% or $7,984 compared to fiscal 2010. This increase was driven primarily by new product sales of $6,700, along with a $2,800 increase in sales of existing products. These increases were offset slightly by a decrease of $1,400 due to unfavorable changes in foreign currency exchange rates.

Gross Profit

Second quarter gross profit for fiscal 2011 increased 34% or $1,251 compared to fiscal 2010 due primarily to higher gross profit attributable to new products and increased sales volumes on the existing portfolio of products. This increase was also due to the absence of a charge to cost of sales related to the step-up in value of inventory acquired in the diagnostic asset acquisitions of approximately $600.

Year-to-date gross profit for fiscal 2011 increased 35% or $2,717 compared to fiscal 2010 due primarily to higher gross profit attributable to new products and increased sales volumes on the existing portfolio of products. This increase was also due to the absence of a charge to cost of sales related to the step-up in value of inventory acquired in the diagnostic asset acquisitions of approximately $900.

Operating Expenses

Second quarter operating expenses for fiscal 2011 increased 10% or $455 compared to fiscal 2010. Year-to-date operating expenses for fiscal 2011 increased 17% or $1,404 compared to fiscal 2010. The second quarter and year-to-date increases in fiscal 2011 were due primarily to higher selling costs associated with variable employee-related expenses.

Unallocated Expenses

 

     Second Quarter      Year-to-Date  
     2011      2010      2011      2010  

Operating expenses

   $ 6,537       $ 11,412       $ 13,051       $ 15,407   

Unallocated expenses were comprised of certain corporate services that were not allocated to the segments. Unallocated expenses for the second quarter of fiscal 2011 decreased 43% or $4,875 compared to fiscal 2010. Year-to-date unallocated expenses decreased 15% or $2,356 compared to fiscal 2010. The second quarter and year-to-date decreases in fiscal 2011 were due primarily to lower variable incentive-related wages and benefits.

Interest and Other (Consolidated)

Interest expense for the second quarter was $11,006 for fiscal 2011 and $10,728 for fiscal 2010. Year-to-date interest expense was $22,579 for fiscal 2011 and $22,535 for fiscal 2010. Interest income for the second quarter was $290 for fiscal 2011 and $5,281 for fiscal 2010. Year-to-date interest income was $1,776 for fiscal 2011 and $10,593 for fiscal 2010. The decrease in interest income was due to the use of the restricted cash balance of $400,000 to prepay the letter of undertaking during the first quarter of fiscal 2011 as discussed in Note 8 of the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

It is currently anticipated that the Paddock acquisition will close during the Company’s fourth quarter of fiscal 2011. With the expected increase in borrowings under the Company’s existing credit facilities and the expected issuance of long-term debt associated with this acquisition, interest expense is expected to increase beginning in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2011 by approximately $10,000 on an annual basis.

 

-45-


Table of Contents

Income Taxes (Consolidated)

The effective tax rate on earnings from continuing operations was 26.5% and 32.9% for the second quarter of fiscal 2011 and 2010, respectively. The effective tax rate on income from continuing operations was 27.2% and 28.2% for the first six months of fiscal 2011 and 2010, respectively. Foreign source income from continuing operations before tax for the second quarter was 31% of pre-tax earnings in fiscal 2011, up from 19% in the same period of fiscal 2010. Foreign source income from continuing operations before tax for the first six months of fiscal 2011 was 30% of pre-tax earnings, down from 35% in the same period for fiscal 2010. Foreign source income is generally derived from jurisdictions with a lower tax rate than the U.S. statutory rate. The effective tax rate for the second quarter of fiscal 2011 included the impact of the newly enacted Tax Relief, Unemployment Insurance Reauthorization, and Job Creation Act of 2010 (the Act). Among other provisions, the Act provides for the restoration of the research and development tax credit, applied retroactively to January 1, 2010. Accordingly, tax expense in the second quarter of fiscal 2011 was reduced by approximately $1,820 to reflect the one-time impact of the retroactive application of the Act. The recorded effective tax rate for the first quarter of fiscal 2010 was reduced by $4,600 or 5.7% due to the statutory tax rate changes in Israel.

In July 2009, Israel lowered its statutory corporate tax rate as follows: 24% for 2010, 23% for 2011, 22% for 2012, 21% for 2013, 20% for 2014 and 18% for 2015 and thereafter. Subsequent to December 25, 2010, Israel enacted new tax legislation. The Company is currently analyzing the legislative change and at this time has not determined its impact.

The Company’s tax rate is subject to adjustment over the balance of the fiscal year due to, among other things, changes in revenue mix, unanticipated changes in applicable laws and changes in the jurisdictions in which the Company does business.

The total amount of unrecognized tax benefits was $103,994 and $72,348 as of December 25, 2010 and June 26, 2010, respectively. It is reasonably possible that the amount of unrecognized tax benefits may significantly change in the next twelve months. The Company is not able to reasonably estimate the changes to unrecognized tax benefits that will be required in future periods.

The total amount accrued for interest and penalties in the liability for uncertain tax positions was $17,655 and $14,430 as of December 25, 2010 and June 26, 2010, respectively.

Financial Condition, Liquidity and Capital Resources

Cash, cash equivalents and current portion of investment securities decreased $147,661 to $134,779 at December 25, 2010 from $282,999 at December 26, 2009. Working capital, including cash, decreased $43,052 to $583,053 at December 25, 2010 from $626,105 at December 26, 2009.

Cash, cash equivalents and current portion of investment securities increased $25,014 to $134,779 at December 25, 2010 from $110,324 at June 26, 2010. Working capital, including cash, increased $108,186 to $583,053 at December 25, 2010 from $474,867 at June 26, 2010.

In addition to the cash and cash equivalents balance of $134,779 at December 25, 2010, the Company had $350,000 available under its revolving loan commitment and approximately $2,000 available under its Indian short-term credit line, as well as $150,000 available under its accounts receivable securitization program described below. Cash, cash equivalents, cash flows from operations and borrowings available under the Company’s credit facilities are expected to be sufficient to finance the known and/or foreseeable liquidity, capital expenditures, dividends and, to the extent authorized, share repurchases of the Company. Although the Company’s lenders have made commitments to make funds available to it in a timely fashion, if the current economic conditions worsen (or new information becomes publicly available impacting the institutions’ credit rating or capital ratios), these lenders may be unable or unwilling to lend money pursuant to the Company’s existing credit facilities.

 

-46-


Table of Contents

Year-to-date net cash provided from operating activities decreased by $33,347 to $122,739 for fiscal 2011 compared to $156,086 for fiscal 2010. The decrease in cash from operations was due primarily to an increase in accounts receivable as a result of the increase in sales volume for fiscal 2011 compared to fiscal 2010 and higher payroll and related tax payments, as well as higher income tax payments. These increases were partially offset by a decrease in accounts payable attributable to general fluctuations in the timing of the overall procurement-to-pay cycle compared to last year.

Year-to-date net cash used for investing activities decreased $25,584 to $31,997 for fiscal 2011 compared to $57,581 for fiscal 2010 due primarily to the absence of the funding used in fiscal 2010 for acquired research and development, the business acquisition of Vedants Drug & Fine Chemicals Private Limited and asset acquisitions, partially offset by an increase in capital expenditures.

Capital expenditures for facilities and equipment were for normal replacement, productivity enhancements and quality improvements. Capital expenditures are anticipated to be between $70,000 to $85,000 for fiscal 2011 due primarily to manufacturing productivity projects, quality investment projects, investments at newly acquired entities, technology infrastructures, system upgrades and the API expansion into India.

Year-to-date net cash used for financing activities decreased $71,473 to $62,340 for fiscal 2011 compared to $133,813 for fiscal 2010. The decrease in cash used for financing activities was due primarily to decreased repurchases of common stock and decreased net repayments of long-term debt.

During the second quarter of fiscal 2011, the Company repurchased 1 share of its common stock for $45 in private party transactions. During the second quarter of fiscal 2010, the Company repurchased 1,218 shares of its common stock for $45,518, of which 2 shares were repurchased in private party transactions. Year-to-date in fiscal 2011, the Company repurchased 141 shares of its common stock for $8,214, all of which were repurchased in private party transactions. Year-to-date in fiscal 2010, the Company repurchased 12,057 shares of its common stock for $70,804, of which 80 shares were repurchased in private party transactions.

The Company paid quarterly dividends totaling $12,268 and $10,838, or $0.1325 and $0.1175 per share, for the first half of fiscal 2011 and 2010, respectively. The declaration and payment of dividends, if any, is subject to the discretion of the Board of Directors and will depend on the earnings, financial condition and capital and surplus requirements of the Company and other factors the Board of Directors may consider relevant.

Credit Facilities

In the second quarter of fiscal 2011, the Company entered into a credit agreement dated as of October 8, 2010 with a group of banks (the 2010 Credit Agreement), which provides an initial revolving loan commitment of $350,000 and an initial term loan commitment of $150,000, each subject to increase or decrease as specified in the 2010 Credit Agreement. Both loans bear interest, at the election of the Company, at either the Annual Base Rate plus an Applicable Margin or the Adjusted London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR) plus an Applicable Margin, as specified and defined in the 2010 Credit Agreement. The obligations under the 2010 Credit Agreement are guaranteed by certain subsidiaries of the Company, and in some instances, the obligations may be secured by a pledge of 65% of the stock of certain foreign subsidiaries. The maturity date of the term and revolving loans under the 2010 Credit Agreement is October 8, 2015. The Company is using the proceeds from the term loan and revolving loan for general corporate purposes and has repaid certain other outstanding debt, including the $100,000 term loan made pursuant to the Company’s prior credit agreement.

In connection with the execution of the 2010 Credit Agreement, the Company terminated its prior credit agreement, dated as of March 16, 2005, and entered into a First Amendment to the Term Loan Agreement, dated as of April 22, 2008, which conforms certain covenants in that Term Loan Agreement to the covenants contained in the 2010 Credit Agreement and makes certain other conforming changes.

 

-47-


Table of Contents

Accounts Receivable Securitization

On July 23, 2009, the Company entered into an accounts receivable securitization program (the Securitization Program) with several of its wholly owned subsidiaries and Bank of America Securities, LLC (Bank of America). The Securitization Program is a 364-day facility, and on July 22, 2010, the Company renewed the Securitization Program with Bank of America, as Agent, and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association (Wells Fargo) as Managing Agent (together, the Committed Investors).

Under the terms of the Securitization Program, the subsidiaries sell certain eligible trade accounts receivables to a wholly owned bankruptcy remote special purpose entity (SPE), Perrigo Receivables, LLC. The Company has retained servicing responsibility. The SPE will then transfer an interest in the receivables to the Committed Investors. Under the terms of the Securitization Program, Bank of America and Wells Fargo have committed $100,000 and $50,000, respectively, effectively allowing the Company to borrow up to a total amount of $150,000, subject to a Maximum Net Investment calculation as defined in the agreement. At December 25, 2010, $150,000 was available under this calculation. The interest rate on the borrowings is based on a thirty-day LIBOR plus 0.55%. If the LIBOR is not available to the Company, the Company may borrow at an alternate rate equal to the greatest of: (i) the Federal Funds Rate plus 1.50%; or (ii) the rate of interest in effect as publicly announced from time to time by the applicable Managing Agent as its “prime rate” plus 2.00%. In addition, a facility fee of 0.55% is applied to the $150,000 commitment. Under the terms of the Securitization Program, the Company may elect to have the entire amount or any portion of the facility unutilized.

Any borrowing made pursuant to the Securitization Program will be classified as short-term debt in the Company’s condensed consolidated balance sheet. The amount of the eligible receivables will vary during the year based on seasonality of the business and could, at times, limit the amount available to the Company from the sale of these interests. There were no borrowings outstanding under the Securitization Program at December 25, 2010, June 26, 2010 and December 26, 2009.

Investment Securities

The Company currently maintains a portfolio of auction rate securities (ARS) with a total par value of $18,000 and an estimated fair value of $5,435 at December 25, 2010. As a result of the tightening of the credit markets beginning in calendar 2008, there has been no liquid market for these securities for an extended period of time. While there are some recent indications that a market is starting to materialize for these securities, though at a much reduced level then the pre-2008 period, the Company cannot predict when liquidity will return for these securities. The Company has reclassified the securities from current assets to other non-current assets due to the unpredictable nature and the illiquidity of the market for the securities. Although the Company continues to earn and collect interest on these investments at the maximum contractual rate, the estimated fair value of ARS cannot be determined by the auction process until liquidity is restored to these markets.

The Company currently engages the services of an independent third-party valuation firm to assist the Company in estimating the current fair value of the ARS, using a discounted cash flow analysis and an assessment of secondary markets, as well as other factors. During the second quarter of fiscal 2011, the Company received an updated estimate for the current fair value of these securities and based on this estimation and other factors, the Company recorded an unrealized gain of $1,042, net of tax, in other comprehensive income. At December 25, 2010, these securities were recorded at a fair value of $5,435. The Company will continue to monitor the credit worthiness of the companies that issued these securities and other appropriate factors and make such adjustments as it deems necessary to reflect the fair value of these securities. See Note 5 of the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information.

Contractual Obligations

There were no material changes in contractual obligations during the second quarter of fiscal 2011.

 

-48-


Table of Contents

Subsequent to the end of the Company’s second fiscal quarter, on January 20, 2011, the Company announced that it had signed a definitive agreement to acquire substantially all the assets of Paddock for approximately $540,000 in cash. The transaction is expected to close in the Company’s fourth quarter of fiscal 2011. The Company intends to fund the transaction using a combination of cash on hand, utilization of its existing credit facilities and new long-term financing.

Critical Accounting Estimates

Determination of certain amounts in the Company’s financial statements requires the use of estimates. These estimates are based upon the Company’s historical experiences combined with management’s understanding of current facts and circumstances. Although the estimates are considered reasonable, actual results could differ from the estimates. The accounting estimates, discussed below, are considered by management to require the most judgment and are critical in the preparation of the financial statements. These estimates are reviewed by the Audit Committee.

Revenue Recognition and Customer-Related Accruals and Allowances – The Company records revenues from product sales when the goods are shipped to the customer. For customers with Free on Board destination terms, a provision is recorded to exclude shipments estimated to be in-transit to these customers at the end of the reporting period. A provision is recorded and accounts receivable are reduced as revenues are recognized for estimated losses on credit sales due to customer claims for discounts, price discrepancies, returned goods and other items. A liability is recorded as revenues are recognized for estimated customer program liabilities, as discussed below.

The Company maintains customer-related accruals and allowances that consist primarily of chargebacks, rebates and shelf stock adjustments. Certain of these accruals and allowances are recorded in the balance sheet as current liabilities and others are recorded as a reduction in accounts receivable.

A chargeback relates to an agreement the Company has with a wholesaler, pharmaceutical buying group or retail customer who will ultimately purchase product from a wholesaler for a contracted price that is different than the Company’s price to the wholesaler. The wholesaler will issue an invoice to the Company for the difference in the contract prices. The accrual for chargebacks is based on historical chargeback experience and confirmed wholesaler inventory levels, as well as estimated sell-through levels by wholesalers to retailers.

Rebates are payments issued to the customer when certain criteria are met, which may include specific levels of product purchases, introduction of new products or other objectives. The accrual for rebates is based on contractual agreements and estimated purchasing levels by customers with such programs. Medicaid rebates are payments made to states for pharmaceutical products covered by the program. The accrual for Medicaid rebates is based on historical trends of rebates paid and current period sales activity.

Shelf stock adjustments are credits issued to reflect decreases in the selling price of a product and are based upon estimates of the amount of product remaining in a customer’s inventory at the time of the anticipated price reduction. In many cases, the customer is contractually entitled to such a credit. The allowances for shelf stock adjustments are based on specified terms with certain customers, estimated launch dates of competing products and estimated declines in market price.

 

-49-


Table of Contents

Changes in these estimates and assumptions may result in additional customer-related accruals and allowances. The following table summarizes the activity included in the balance sheet for customer-related accruals and allowances:

 

     Year-to-Date
2011
    Year-to-Date
2010
 

Customer-Related Accruals and Allowances

    

Balance, beginning of period

   $ 63,735      $ 56,462   

Provision recorded

     221,570        159,079   

Credits processed

     (189,538     (149,129
                

Balance, end of the period

   $ 95,767      $ 66,412   
                

Allowance for Doubtful Accounts – The Company maintains an allowance for doubtful accounts that reduces receivables to amounts that are expected to be collected. In estimating the allowance, management considers factors such as current overall and industry-specific economic conditions, statutory requirements, historical and anticipated customer performance, historical experience with write-offs and the level of past-due amounts. Changes in these conditions may result in additional allowances. The allowance for doubtful accounts was $8,896 at December 25, 2010, $8,015 at June 26, 2010 and $9,408 at December 26, 2009.

Inventory Reserves – The Company maintains reserves for estimated obsolete or unmarketable inventory based on the difference between the cost of the inventory and its estimated market value. In estimating the reserves, management considers factors such as excess or slow-moving inventories, product expiration dating, products on quality hold, current and future customer demand and market conditions. Changes in these conditions may result in additional reserves.

Goodwill – Goodwill is tested for impairment annually or more frequently if changes in circumstances or the occurrence of events suggest impairment exists. The test for impairment requires the Company to make several estimates about fair value, most of which are based on projected future cash flows. The estimates associated with the goodwill impairment tests are considered critical due to the judgments required in determining fair value amounts, including projected future cash flows. Changes in these estimates may result in the recognition of an impairment loss. The Company performs its annual goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets impairment testing for all of its reporting units in the fourth quarter of the fiscal year. The Company’s Rx and API businesses are heavily dependent on new products currently under development. The termination of certain key product development projects could have a materially adverse impact on the future results of the Rx Pharmaceuticals or API segment, which may include a charge for goodwill impairment. A change in market dynamics or failure of operational execution for the Company’s Consumer Healthcare U.K. operations could result in a materially adverse impact on its future results, which could result in a charge for goodwill impairment. Goodwill was $632,890 at December 25, 2010, $618,088 at June 26, 2010 and $269,242 at December 26, 2009.

Other Intangible Assets – Other intangible assets consist of a portfolio of individual developed product technology/formulation and product rights, distribution and license agreements, customer relationships, non-compete agreements and trade names and trademarks. The assets categorized as developed product technology/formulation and product rights, certain distribution and license agreements and non-compete agreements are amortized over their estimated useful economic lives using the straight-line method. An accelerated method of amortization is used for customer relationships and certain distribution agreements. Certain trade names and trademarks are determined to have an indefinite useful life and are not subject to amortization. The Company, however, reviews them for impairment on an annual basis, or more frequently if events or changes in circumstances indicate that any individual asset might be impaired, and adjusts the carrying value of the asset as necessary. For intangible assets subject to amortization, an impairment analysis is performed whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of any individual asset may not be recoverable. The carrying amount of an intangible asset is not recoverable if it exceeds the sum of the undiscounted cash flows expected to result from the use and eventual disposition of the asset. An impairment loss is recognized if the carrying amount of

 

-50-


Table of Contents

the asset is not recoverable and its carrying amount exceeds its fair value. Other intangible assets had a net carrying value of $585,457 at December 25, 2010, $593,575 at June 26, 2010 and $213,882 at December 26, 2009.

Income Taxes – The Company’s effective income tax rate is based on income, statutory tax rates, special tax benefits and tax planning opportunities available to the Company in the various jurisdictions in which it operates. Tax laws are complex and subject to different interpretations by the taxpayer and respective governmental taxing authorities. Significant judgment is required in determining the Company’s tax expense and in evaluating tax positions. Tax positions are reviewed quarterly, and balances are adjusted as new information becomes available.

The Company has established valuation allowances against a portion of its non-U.S. net operating losses and U.S. state-related net operating losses to reflect the uncertainty of its ability to fully utilize these benefits given the limited carryforward periods permitted by the various jurisdictions. The evaluation of the Company’s ability to realize net operating losses requires the use of considerable management judgment to estimate the future taxable income for the various jurisdictions, for which the ultimate amounts and timing of such realization may differ. The valuation allowances can also be impacted by changes in the tax regulations.

Significant judgment is required in determining the Company’s contingent tax liabilities. The Company recognizes accrued interest and penalties related to contingent tax liabilities in its tax expense. The Company has established contingent tax liabilities using management’s best judgment and adjusts these liabilities as warranted by changing facts and circumstances. A change in tax liabilities in any given period could have a significant impact on the Company’s results of operations and cash flows for that period.

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

See Note 1 of the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for information regarding recently issued accounting standards.

 

-51-


Table of Contents
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk (in thousands)

The Company is exposed to market risk due to changes in interest rates, the liquidity of the securities markets and currency exchange rates.

Interest Rate Risk - The Company is exposed to interest rate changes primarily as a result of interest income earned on its investment of cash on hand and interest expense on borrowings used to finance acquisitions and working capital requirements.

The Company enters into certain derivative financial instruments, when available on a cost-effective basis, to hedge its underlying economic exposure related to the management of interest rate risk. See Note 9 of the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for further information regarding the Company’s derivative and hedging activities. Because of the use of certain derivative financial instruments and the significant amount of fixed rate debt, the Company believes that a fluctuation in interest rates in the near future will not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements. These instruments are managed on a consolidated basis to efficiently net exposures and thus take advantage of any natural offsets. Derivative financial instruments are not used for speculative purposes. Gains and losses on hedging transactions are offset by gains and losses on the underlying exposures being hedged.

Market Risk - The Company’s investment securities include auction rate securities totaling $18,000 in par value. Auction rate securities are privately placed variable rate debt instruments whose interest rates are reset within a contractual range, approximately every 7 to 35 days. With the tightening of the credit markets beginning in calendar 2008, auction rate securities have failed to settle at auction resulting in an illiquid market for these types of securities. Although the Company continues to earn and collect interest on these investments at the maximum contractual rate, the estimated fair value of auction rate securities cannot be determined by the auction process until liquidity is restored to these markets. While there are some recent indications that a market is starting to materialize for these securities, though at a much reduced level then the pre-2008 period, the Company cannot predict when liquidity will return for these securities. The Company has reclassified the securities from current assets to other non-current assets due to the unpredictable nature and the illiquidity of the market for the securities.

The Company currently engages the services of an independent third-party valuation firm to assist the Company in estimating the current fair value of the ARS, using a discounted cash flow analysis and an assessment of secondary markets, as well as other factors. During the second quarter of fiscal 2011, the Company received an updated estimate for the current fair value of these securities and based on this estimation and other factors, the Company recorded an unrealized gain of $1,042, net of tax, in other comprehensive income. At December 25, 2010, these securities were recorded at a fair value of $5,435. The Company will continue to monitor the credit worthiness of the companies that issued these securities and other appropriate factors and make such adjustments as it deems necessary to reflect the fair value of these securities.

Foreign Exchange Risk - The Company has operations in the U.K., Israel, Mexico and Australia. These operations transact business in their local currency and foreign currencies, thereby creating exposures to changes in exchange rates. A large portion of the sales of the Company’s Israeli operations is in foreign currencies, primarily U.S. dollars and euros, while these operations incur costs in their local currency. In addition, the Company’s U.S. operations continue to expand its export business, primarily in Canada, China and Europe and is subject to fluctuations in the respective currency exchange rates relative to the U.S. dollar. Due to sales and cost structures, certain segments experience a negative impact as a result of the changes in exchange rates, while other segments experience a positive impact related to foreign currency exchange.

The Company monitors and strives to manage risk related to changes in foreign currency exchange rates. Exposures that cannot be naturally offset within a local entity to an immaterial amount are often hedged with foreign currency derivatives or netted with offsetting exposures at other entities. See Note 9 of the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for further information regarding the Company’s derivative and hedging activities. The Company cannot predict future changes in foreign currency exposure. Unfavorable fluctuations could adversely impact earnings.

 

-52-


Table of Contents

See Item 7A. “Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk” in the Company’s Form 10-K for the year ended June 26, 2010 for additional information regarding market risks.

 

Item 4. Controls and Procedures

As of December 25, 2010, the Company’s management, including its Chief Executive Officer and its Chief Financial Officer, has performed an interim review on the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures pursuant to Rule 13a–15(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Based on that review, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures are effective in ensuring that all material information relating to the Company and its consolidated subsidiaries required to be included in the Company’s periodic SEC filings would be made known to them by others within those entities in a timely manner and that no changes are required at this time.

In connection with the interim evaluation by the Company’s management, including its Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting pursuant to Rule 13a–15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, no changes during the quarter ended December 25, 2010 were identified that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2010, the Company acquired PBM Holdings, Inc. (PBM) (see Note 2 – Acquisitions for additional information). As permitted by Securities and Exchange Commission Staff interpretive guidance for newly acquired businesses, management excluded PBM from its interim evaluation of internal control over financial reporting as of December 25, 2010. The Company is in the process of documenting and testing PBM’s internal controls over financial reporting and will incorporate PBM into its annual report on internal control over financial reporting for its fiscal year end 2011. As of December 25, 2010, PBM’s total assets represented 29% of the Company’s consolidated total assets. PBM’s net sales represented 12% of the Company’s consolidated net sales for the first half of fiscal 2011.

 

-53-


Table of Contents

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

 

Item 1. Legal Proceedings

Referred to in Note 13 of the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

 

Item 1A. Risk Factors

The Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed for the fiscal year ended June 26, 2010 includes a detailed discussion of the Company’s risk factors. Other than the items noted below, there have been no material changes during the first half of fiscal 2011 to the risk factors that were included in the Form 10-K.

If the Company is unable to maintain adequately high levels of customer service over time, it may lose market share, and its business and operating results may be materially adversely affected.

The Company understands that maintaining high levels of customer service requires the Company to be able to deliver high quality products to its customers on a timely basis. From time to time, the Company can experience interruptions and challenges to its customer service levels due to a variety of factors that may arise. Recently, as some of the Company’s competitors have experienced production problems or have suspended production altogether, the Company has experienced significant increases in the volume of customer orders in certain product categories. Additionally, recent enhancements to the Company’s quality assurance systems constrained the pace of some of the Company’s production output for a limited period of time. If the Company is unable to maintain adequately high levels of customer service over time, due to these factors or otherwise, the Company may lose market share, and its business and operating results may be materially adversely affected.

Impact of “At Risk” Launches

At times, the Company may seek approval to market ANDA products before the expiration of patents for those products, based upon its belief that such patents are invalid, unenforceable or would not be infringed by its products. As a result, the Company may face significant patent litigation. Depending upon a complex analysis of a variety of legal and commercial factors, the Company may, in certain circumstances, elect to market a generic pharmaceutical product while litigation is pending, before any court decision or while an appeal of a lower court decision is pending. This is referred to in the pharmaceutical industry as an “at risk” launch. The risk involved in an “at risk” launch can be substantial because, if a patent holder ultimately prevails, the remedies available to the patent holder may include, among other things, damages measured by the profits lost by the holder, which are often significantly higher than the profits the Company makes from selling the generic version of the product. By electing to proceed in this manner, the Company could face substantial damages if a final court decision is adverse to the Company. In the case where a patent holder is able to prove that the Company’s infringement was “willful” or “exceptional”, the definition of which is subjective, the patent holder may be awarded up to three times the amount of its actual damages. During the second quarter of fiscal 2011, the Company, and its partner Synthon, launched levocetirizine tablets, a generic version of Xyzal® tablets from UCB/Sepracor prior to the expiration of the relevant patent. Synthon and the Company share both the risks and the benefits associated with the at risk launch.

Federal and state health care reform may have an adverse effect on the Company’s financial condition and results of operations.

In July 2007, The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) issued a final rule for the calculation of the Average Manufacturer Price (AMP), which pharmaceutical companies are required to report to CMS. CMS intends to use this calculation to help determine reimbursements to pharmacies that dispense medicines to Medicaid beneficiaries. Prior to the enactment of this legal requirement, CMS typically used the Average Wholesaler Price (AWP) or Wholesaler Acquisition Cost (WAC) in the calculation of federal upper limits. The rule also rejected requests to postpone the public availability of AMP data. In mid-December 2007, a preliminary injunction was granted, resulting in postponement of the actual implementation of the rule. On December 15, 2010, by agreement of the parties, the injunction was dissolved and the case was dismissed. The Patient Protection and Affordable Care

 

-54-


Table of Contents

Act, Pub. L. No. 111-148, 124 Stat. 119, § 2503 (2010), amended the statutory definitions of the terms “average manufacturer price” and “multiple source drug” in a manner that materially affects the regulatory definitions of those terms, and changed the manner in which defendants calculate federal upper limits (FULs). On November 15, 2010, CMS issued a final rule that withdraws the regulations defining “average manufacturer price” and “multiple source drug” and the regulation pursuant to which it would have established FULs for multiple source drugs. That final rule became effective December 15, 2010. The Company does not know how the new methodology for calculating FULs, will affect the Company’s pharmacy customers or to what extent these customers will seek to pass on any decrease in Medicaid reimbursements to the Company. The Company cannot predict how the sharing of weighted average monthly AMP data and retail survey prices may impact competition in the marketplace.

Recent court rulings limiting the application of Federal preemption may have an adverse effect on the Company’s operations as a result of a potential increase in litigation exposure.

On January 24, 2011, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit issued a decision in Gaeta v. Perrigo, reversing a lower court decision that the plaintiff’s state law causes of action were preempted by the FDC Act to the extent that they were based on a lack of adequate warning on the Company’s OTC ibuprofen drug product. In its decision, the Ninth Circuit stated that it joined the Fifth and Eighth Circuits in concluding that the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision in Wyeth v. Levine, 129 S. Ct 1187 (2009) (concluding that the federal regulatory regime governing pharmaceuticals does not preempt state law failure-to-warn claims against brand name manufacturers) “extends with equal force to claims against generic manufacturers.” The Company intends to appeal the Ninth Circuit’s ruling in Gaeta. However, the decisions by the Fifth, Eighth and Ninth Circuits, if sustained, will affect all manufacturers of generic pharmaceutical products (OTC and Rx) by limiting their ability to dismiss certain failure-to-warn claims based on Federal preemption. At this time, the Company cannot predict the impact of these cases on its results of operations.

 

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds (in thousands, except per share amounts)

On February 1, 2008, the Board of Directors approved a plan to repurchase shares of common stock with a value of up to $150,000. The Company completed purchases under this plan on December 16, 2009. All common stock repurchased by the Company becomes authorized but unissued stock and is available for reissuance in the future for general corporate purposes.

The table below lists the Company’s repurchases of shares of common stock during its most recently completed quarter:

 

Fiscal 2011

   Total
Number of
Shares
Purchased (1)
     Average
Price Paid
per Share
     Total Number of
Shares Purchased
as Part of Publicly
Announced  Plans
     Value of
Shares
Available for
Purchase
 
            $ —     

September 26 to October 30

     —         $ 65.80         —         $ —     

October 31 to November 27

     1       $ 63.91         —         $ —     

November 28 to December 25

     —         $ —           —         $ —     
                       

Total

     1            —        

 

(1)

Private party transactions accounted for the purchase of 1 share in the period from October 31 to November 27.

 

-55-


Table of Contents
Item 6. Exhibits

 

Exhibit
Number

  

Description

  2.1   

Purchase Agreement, dated as of January 20, 2011, among Perrigo Company, Paddock Laboratories, Inc., Paddock Properties Limited Partnership, and, solely for the purposes of Section 11.15, certain Guarantors listed on Exhibit A, incorporated by reference from Exhibit 2.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on January 26, 2011.

10.1   

Term Loan Agreement, dated as of January 20, 2011, among Perrigo Company; JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as Administrative Agent; Morgan Stanley Senior Funding, Inc. and Bank of America, N.A., as Syndication Agents; and the lender parties therein listed, incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on January 26, 2011.

10.1   

First Amendment, dated as of October 8, 2010, to Term Loan Agreement, dated as of April 22, 2008, among Perrigo Company, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as Administrative Agent; RBS Citizens, N.A., as Syndication Agent; and the lender parties therein listed, incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on October 14, 2010.

10.2   

Credit Agreement, dated as of October 8, 2010, among Perrigo Company and certain of its subsidiaries, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as Administrative Agent; Bank of America, N.A. and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Syndication Agents; HSBC Bank USA, National Association, Fifth Third Bank and Bank Leumi USA, as Documentation Agents; and the lender parties therein listed, incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.2 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on October 14, 2010.

  31   

Rule 13a-14(a) Certifications.

  32   

Section 1350 Certifications.

101.INS   

XBRL Instance Document.

101.SCH   

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document.

101.CAL   

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document.

101.LAB   

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document.

101.PRE   

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document.

 

-56-


Table of Contents

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

 

   

PERRIGO COMPANY

   

(Registrant)

Date: February 1, 2011                                                             

   

By: /s/ Joseph C. Papa

   

Joseph C. Papa

   

Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer

Date: February 1, 2011                                                             

   

By: /s/ Judy L. Brown

   

Judy L. Brown

   

Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

   

(Principal Accounting and Financial Officer)

 

-57-


Table of Contents

EXHIBIT INDEX

 

Exhibit
Number

  

Description

  2.1   

Purchase Agreement, dated as of January 20, 2011, among Perrigo Company, Paddock Laboratories, Inc., Paddock Properties Limited Partnership, and, solely for the purposes of Section 11.15, certain Guarantors listed on Exhibit A, incorporated by reference from Exhibit 2.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on January 26, 2011.

10.1   

Term Loan Agreement, dated as of January 20, 2011, among Perrigo Company; JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as Administrative Agent; Morgan Stanley Senior Funding, Inc. and Bank of America, N.A., as Syndication Agents; and the lender parties therein listed, incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on January 26, 2011.

10.1   

First Amendment, dated as of October 8, 2010, to Term Loan Agreement, dated as of April 22, 2008, among Perrigo Company, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as Administrative Agent; RBS Citizens, N.A., as Syndication Agent; and the lender parties therein listed, incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on October 14, 2010.

10.2   

Credit Agreement, dated as of October 8, 2010, among Perrigo Company and certain of its subsidiaries, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as Administrative Agent; Bank of America, N.A. and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Syndication Agents; HSBC Bank USA, National Association, Fifth Third Bank and Bank Leumi USA, as Documentation Agents; and the lender parties therein listed, incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.2 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on October 14, 2010.

  31   

Rule 13a-14(a) Certifications.

  32   

Section 1350 Certifications.

101.INS   

XBRL Instance Document.

101.SCH   

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document.

101.CAL   

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document.

101.LAB   

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document.

101.PRE   

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document.

 

-58-