Edgar Filing: PINNACLE FINANCIAL PARTNERS INC

form10q.htm

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

	(mark one)
	x	QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
		For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2007
		or
	o	TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OF 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
		For the transition period from ____ to ____
		Commission File Number: 000-31225

	, Inc.
	(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Tennessee		62-1812853
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)		(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

211 Commerce Street, Suite 300, Nashville, Tennessee		37201
(Address of principal executive offices)		(Zip Code)

	(615) 744-3700
	(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

	Not Applicable
	(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changes since last report)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

Yes T

No £

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of “accelerated filer and large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large Accelerated Filer £

Accelerated Filer T

Non-accelerated Filer £

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

Yes £

No T

As of July 30, 2007 there were 15,547,063 shares of common stock, $1.00 par value per share, issued and outstanding.

Pinnacle Financial Partners, Inc.

Report on Form 10-Q

June 30, 2007

TABLE OF CONTENTS
	Page No.
PART I – Financial Information:

Item 1. Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)	2

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	23

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk	43

Item 4. Controls and Procedures	43

PART II – Other Information:

Item 1. Legal Proceedings	44

Item 1A. Risk Factors	44

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	44

Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities	44

Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders	44

Item 5. Other Information	44

Item 6. Exhibits	45

Signatures	46

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

Pinnacle Financial Partners, Inc. (“Pinnacle Financial”) may from time to time make written or oral statements, including statements contained in this report which may constitute forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”). The words “expect”, “anticipate”, “intend”, “consider”, “plan”, “believe”, “seek”, “should”, “estimate”, and similar expressions are intended to identify such forward-looking statements, but other statements may constitute forward-looking statements. These statements should be considered subject to various risks and uncertainties. Such forward-looking statements are made based upon management's belief as well as assumptions made by, and information currently available to, management pursuant to "safe harbor" provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Pinnacle Financial’s actual results may differ materially from the results anticipated in forward-looking statements due to a variety of factors. Such factors are described below and in Pinnacle Financial’s Form 10-K, as updated by Item 1A of part II of this Form 10-Q and include, without limitation, (i) unanticipated deterioration in the financial condition of borrowers resulting in significant increases in loan losses and provisions for those losses, (ii) increased competition with other financial institutions, (iii) lack of sustained growth in the economy in the Nashville, Tennessee or Knoxville, Tennessee areas, (iv) rapid fluctuations or unanticipated changes in interest rates, (v) the inability of our bank subsidiary, Pinnacle National Bank to satisfy regulatory requirements for its expansion plans, (vi) the inability of Pinnacle Financial to achieve its targeted expansion goals in the Knoxville, Tennessee market, (vii) the ability of Pinnacle Financial to grow its loan portfolio at historic or planned rates and (viii) changes in the legislative and regulatory environment, including compliance with the various provisions of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. Many of such factors are beyond Pinnacle Financial’s ability to control or predict, and readers are cautioned not to put undue reliance on such forward-looking statements. Pinnacle Financial does not intend to update or reissue any forward-looking statements contained in this report as a result of new information or other circumstances that may become known to Pinnacle Financial.

Page 1

Table of Contents

ITEM 1.

Part I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

PINNACLE FINANCIAL PARTNERS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(Unaudited)

	June 30, 2007			December 31, 2006
*ASSETS*
Cash and noninterest-bearing due from banks	$	51,816,558		$	43,611,533
Interest-bearing due from banks		10,375,896			1,041,174
Federal funds sold		43,808,801			47,866,143
Cash and cash equivalents		106,001,255			92,518,850

Securities available-for-sale, at fair value		312,712,769			319,237,428
Securities held-to-maturity (fair value of $26,211,163 and $26,594,235 at June 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006, respectively)		27,068,467			27,256,876
Mortgage loans held-for-sale		4,972,689			5,654,381

Loans		1,663,029,941			1,497,734,824
Less allowance for loan losses		(17,375,408	)		(16,117,978	)
Loans, net		1,645,654,533			1,481,616,846

Premises and equipment, net		37,854,546			36,285,796
Investments in unconsolidated subsidiaries and other entities		17,000,500			16,200,684
Accrued interest receivable		11,434,826			11,019,173
Goodwill		114,287,640			114,287,640
Core deposit intangible, net		10,353,498			11,385,006
Other assets		27,986,475			26,724,183
Total assets	$	2,315,327,198		$	2,142,186,863

*LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY*
Deposits:
Noninterest-bearing demand	$	294,630,589		$	300,977,814
Interest-bearing demand		284,080,394			236,674,425
Savings and money market accounts		530,081,179			485,935,897
Time		688,744,094			598,823,167
Total deposits		1,797,536,256			1,622,411,303
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase		140,442,583			141,015,761
Federal Home Loan Bank advances		26,698,614			53,725,833
Federal funds purchased		20,000,000			-
Subordinated debt		51,548,000			51,548,000
Accrued interest payable		5,960,627			4,952,422
Other liabilities		7,946,624			12,516,523
Total liabilities		2,050,132,704			1,886,169,842
Stockholders’ equity:
Preferred stock, no par value; 10,000,000 shares authorized; no shares issued and outstanding		-			-
Common stock, par value $1.00; 90,000,000 shares authorized;
15,545,581 issued and outstanding at June 30, 2007 and
15,446,074 issued and outstanding at December 31, 2006		15,545,581			15,446,074
Additional paid-in capital		212,922,658			211,502,516
Retained earnings		42,137,029			31,109,324
Accumulated other comprehensive loss, net of deferred income taxes		(5,410,774	)		(2,040,893	)
Total stockholders’ equity		265,194,494			256,017,021
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	$	2,315,327,198		$	2,142,186,863

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

Page 2

Table of Contents

PINNACLE FINANCIAL PARTNERS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME

(Unaudited)

	Three Months Ended June 30,				Six Months Ended June 30,
	2007		2006		2007		2006
Interest income:
Loans, including fees	$	30,555,889	$	24,245,895	$	59,533,113	$	37,424,725
Securities:
Taxable		3,394,359		3,148,459		6,740,479		6,009,577
Tax-exempt		693,417		494,849		1,362,936		895,622
Federal funds sold and other		864,198		415,437		1,610,577		785,112
Total interest income		35,507,863		28,304,640		69,247,105		45,115,036

Interest expense:
Deposits		14,456,629		9,563,035		27,993,892		15,413,344
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase		1,890,743		678,177		3,602,834		1,186,965
Federal funds purchased and other borrowings		1,499,436		1,168,265		2,906,896		2,112,761
Total interest expense		17,846,808		11,409,477		34,503,622		18,713,070
Net interest income		17,661,055		16,895,163		34,743,483		26,401,966
Provision for loan losses		899,998		1,706,865		1,687,964		2,094,049
Net interest income after provision for loan losses		16,761,057		15,188,298		33,055,519		24,307,917

Noninterest income:
Service charges on deposit accounts		1,920,085		1,356,114		3,717,234		1,794,384
Investment sales commissions		850,207		652,900		1,584,767		1,166,497
Insurance sales commissions		628,953		748,534		1,265,915		1,013,362
Gain on loans and loan participations sold, net		638,895		470,809		1,002,201		795,355
Trust fees		425,205		311,997		845,495		363,997
Other noninterest income		1,088,172		839,771		2,161,488		1,294,781
Total noninterest income		5,551,517		4,380,125		10,577,100		6,428,376

Noninterest expense:
Compensation and employee benefits		8,794,853		7,289,996		17,061,354		11,738,354
Equipment and occupancy		2,412,528		2,081,194		4,577,230		3,254,547
Marketing and other business development		430,291		357,904		682,026		548,375
Postage and supplies		524,197		445,211		979,114		630,619
Amortization of core deposit intangible		515,755		515,755		1,031,508		647,437
Other noninterest expense		1,806,680		1,493,765		3,276,764		2,250,377
Merger related expense		-		921,237		-		1,364,567
Total noninterest expense		14,484,304		13,105,062		27,607,996		20,434,276
Income before income taxes		7,828,270		6,463,361		16,024,623		10,302,017
Income tax expense		2,402,405		2,140,887		4,996,918		3,367,647
Net income	$	5,425,865	$	4,322,474	$	11,027,705	$	6,934,370

*Per share information:*
Basic net income per common share	$	0.35	$	0.28	$	0.71	$	0.56
Diluted net income per common share	$	0.33	$	0.26	$	0.66	$	0.51

Weighted average shares outstanding:
Basic		15,494,522		15,335,754		15,464,151		12,473,187
Diluted		16,664,213		16,503,692		16,640,977		13,640,565

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

Page 3

Table of Contents

PINNACLE FINANCIAL PARTNERS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

(Unaudited)

For the six months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006

	Common Stock
	Shares		Amount		Additional Paid-in Capital			Unearned Compensation			Retained Earnings			Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss			Total Stockholders’ Equity

Balances, December 31, 2005		8,426,551	$	8,426,551	$	44,890,912		$	(169,689	)	$	13,182,291		$	(2,893,640	)	$	63,436,425
Transfer of unearned compensation to additional paid-in capital upon adoption of SFAS No. 123(R)		-		-		(169,689	)		169,689			-			-			-
Exercise of employee common stock options and related tax benefits		83,667		83,667		813,688			-			-			-			897,355
Issuance of restricted common shares pursuant to 2004 Equity Incentive Plan		4,400		4,400		(4,400	)		-			-			-			-
Compensation expense for restricted stock		-		-		127,218			-			-			-			127,218
Compensation expense for stock options		-		-		405,394			-						-			405,394
Merger with Cavalry Bancorp, Inc.		6,856,298		6,856,298		164,231,274			-			-			-			171,087,572
Dividends paid to minority interest shareholders of PNFP Properties, Inc.		-		-		-			-			(7,813	)		-			(7,813	)
Costs to register common stock issued in connection with the merger with Cavalry Bancorp, Inc.		-		-		(187,609	)		-			-			-			(187,609	)
Comprehensive income:
Net income		-		-		-			-			6,934,370			-			6,934,370
Net unrealized holding losses on available-for-sale securities, net of deferred tax benefit of $2,316,138		-		-		-			-			-			(3,954,393	)		(3,954,393	)
Total comprehensive income																		2,979,977
Balances, June 30, 2006		15,370,916	$	15,370,916	$	210,106,788		$	-		$	20,108,848		$	(6,848,033	)	$	238,738,519

Balances, December 31, 2006		15,446,074	$	15,446,074	$	211,502,516		$	-		$	31,109,324		$	(2,040,893	)	$	256,017,021
Exercise of employee common stock options and related tax benefits		70,981		70,981		525,216			-			-			-			596,197
Issuance of restricted common shares pursuant to 2004 Equity Incentive Plan		28,526		28,526		(28,526	)		-			-			-			-
Compensation expense for restricted stock		-		-		121,747			-			-			-			121,747
Compensation expense for stock options		-		-		801,705			-			-			-			801,705
Comprehensive income:
Net income		-		-		-			-			11,027,705			-			11,027,705
Net unrealized holding losses on available-for-sale securities, net of deferred tax benefit of $1,285,456		-		-		-			-			-			(3,369,881	)		(3,369,881	)
Total comprehensive income																		7,657,824
Balances, June 30, 2007		15,545,581	$	15,545,581	$	212,922,658		$	-		$	42,137,029		$	(5,410,774	)	$	265,194,494

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

Page 4

Table of Contents

PINNACLE FINANCIAL PARTNERS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(Unaudited)

	Six months ended June 30,
	2007			2006
Operating activities:
Net income	$	11,027,705		$	6,934,370
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities:
Net amortization of premium on securities		256,167			407,638
Depreciation and net amortization		1,040,380			2,102,657
Provision for loan losses		1,687,964			2,094,049
Gains on loans and loan participations sold, net		(1,002,201	)		(795,355	)
Stock-based compensation expense		923,452			532,612
Deferred tax benefit from exercise of stock options		(328,621	)		(1,155,385	)
Excess tax benefit from stock compensation		(94,640	)		(74,908	)
Mortgage loans held for sale:
Loans originated		(81,770,437	)		(61,896,095	)
Loans sold		83,242,466			60,374,707
(Increase) decrease in other assets		1,263,176			(7,284,404	)
Decrease in other liabilities		(3,561,695	)		(7,225,932	)
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities		12,683,716			(5,986,046	)

Investing activities:
Activities in securities available-for-sale:
Purchases		(19,457,551	)		(10,779,152	)
Sales		-			-
Maturities, prepayments and calls		20,479,160			17,014,717
		1,021,609			6,235,565
Increase in loans, net		(164,558,472	)		(159,916,412	)
Purchases of premises and equipment and software		(3,425,182	)		(2,852,886	)
Cash and cash equivalents acquired in merger with Cavalry Bancorp, Inc., net of acquisition costs		-			37,420,210
Investments in unconsolidated subsidiaries and other entities		(823,474	)		-
Purchases of other assets		-			(519,689	)
Net cash used in investing activities		(167,785,519	)		(119,633,212	)

Financing activities:
Net increase in deposits		175,588,408			166,094,406
Net increase (decrease) in securities sold under agreements to repurchase		(573,178	)		38,545,678
Net increase in Federal funds purchased		20,000,000			-
Advances from Federal Home Loan Bank:
Issuances		45,000,000			31,000,000
Payments		(72,027,219	)		(56,518,145	)
Exercise of common stock options		501,557			822,447
Excess tax benefit from stock compensation		94,640			74,908
Costs incurred in connection with registration of common stock issued in merger		-			(187,609	)
Net cash provided by financing activities		168,584,208			179,831,685
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents		13,482,405			54,212,427
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period		92,518,850			58,654,270
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period	$	106,001,255		$	112,866,697

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

Page 5

Table of Contents

PINNACLE FINANCIAL PARTNERS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

Note 1.

Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Nature of Business — Pinnacle Financial Partners, Inc. (Pinnacle Financial) is a bank holding company whose primary business is conducted by its wholly-owned subsidiary, Pinnacle National Bank (Pinnacle National). Pinnacle National is a commercial bank headquartered in Nashville, Tennessee with operations in Nashville and Knoxville, Tennessee. Pinnacle National provides a full range of financial services, including banking, investments, mortgages, and insurance.

Basis of Presentation — These consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Pinnacle Financial and its wholly-owned subsidiaries. PNFP Statutory Trust I, PNFP Statutory Trust II, PNFP Statutory Trust III and Collateral Plus, LLC, are affiliates of Pinnacle Financial and are included in these consolidated financial statements pursuant to the equity method of accounting. Significant intercompany transactions and accounts are eliminated in consolidation. The unaudited consolidated financial statements include, in the opinion of management, all adjustments necessary for a fair presentation of such financial statements for all periods presented.

Use of Estimates — The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities as of the balance sheet date and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Material estimates that are particularly susceptible to significant change in the near term include the determination of the allowance for loan losses.

Impairment— Long-lived assets, including purchased intangible assets subject to amortization, such as Pinnacle Financial’s core deposit intangible asset, are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. Recoverability of assets to be held and used is measured by a comparison of the carrying amount of an asset to estimated undiscounted future cash flows expected to be generated by the asset. If the carrying amount of an asset exceeds its estimated future cash flows, an impairment charge is recognized for the excess of the carrying amount over the fair value of the asset. Assets to be disposed of are reported at the lower of the carrying amount or fair value less costs to sell, and are no longer depreciated.

Goodwill and intangible assets that have indefinite useful lives are tested annually for impairment and more frequently if events and circumstances indicate that the asset might be impaired. An impairment loss is recognized to the extent that the carrying amount exceeds the asset’s fair value. Pinnacle Financial’s annual assessment date is as of September 30 such that the assessment will be completed during the fourth quarter of each year. Should Pinnacle Financial determine in a future period that the goodwill recorded in connection with the acquisition of Cavalry Bancorp, Inc. (“Cavalry”) has been impaired, then a charge to earnings will be recorded in the period such determination is made.

Cash and Cash Flows — Cash on hand, cash items in process of collection, amounts due from banks, Federal funds sold and securities purchased under agreements to resell, with original maturities within ninety days, are included in cash and cash equivalents. The following supplemental cash flow information addresses certain cash payments and noncash transactions for each of the six months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006 as follows:

	*For the six months ended June 30,*
	*2007*		*2006*
*Cash Payments:*
Interest	$	35,975,282	$	12,618,997
Income taxes		7,850,000		3,600,000
*Noncash Transactions:*
Loans charged-off to the allowance for loan losses		552,180		500,158
Loans foreclosed upon with repossessions transferred to other assets		110,570		-
Common stock and options issued to acquire Cavalry Bancorp, Inc		-		171,087,572

Page 6

Table of Contents

PINNACLE FINANCIAL PARTNERS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

Income Per Common Share — Basic earnings per share (“EPS”) is computed by dividing net income by the weighted average common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted EPS reflects the dilution that could occur if securities or other contracts to issue common stock were exercised or converted. The difference between basic and diluted weighted average shares outstanding was attributable to common stock options, warrants and restricted shares. The dilutive effect of outstanding options, warrants and restricted shares is reflected in diluted earnings per share by application of the treasury stock method.

As of June 30, 2007 and 2006, there were options outstanding to purchase 1,902,000 and 1,562,000 common shares, respectively. Most of these options have exercise prices, compensation costs attributable to future services and excess tax benefits, which when considered in relation to the average market price of Pinnacle Financial’s common stock, are considered dilutive and are considered in Pinnacle Financial’s diluted income per share calculation for the three and six months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006. There were common stock options of 221,000, and 380,000 outstanding as of June 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively, which were considered anti-dilutive and thus have not been considered in the diluted earnings per share calculations below. Additionally, as of June 30, 2007 and 2006, Pinnacle Financial had outstanding warrants to purchase 395,000 and 406,000, respectively, of common shares which have been considered in the calculation of Pinnacle Financial’s diluted net income per share for three and six months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006.

The following is a summary of the basic and diluted earnings per share calculation for the three and six months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006:

	*For the three months ended June 30,*				*For the six months ended June 30,*
	*2007*		*2006*		*2007*		*2006*
*Basic earnings per share calculation:*
Numerator - Net income	$	5,425,865	$	4,322,474	$	11,027,705	$	6,934,370

Denominator - Average common shares outstanding		15,494,522		15,335,754		15,464,151		12,473,187
Basic net income per share	$	0.35	$	0.28	$	0.71	$	0.56

*Diluted earnings per share calculation:*
Numerator - Net income	$	5,425,865	$	4,322,474	$	11,027,705	$	6,934,370

Denominator - Average common shares outstanding		15,494,522		15,335,754		15,464,151		12,473,187
Dilutive shares contingently issuable		1,169,691		1,167,938		1,176,826		1,167,378
Average diluted common shares outstanding		16,664,213		16,503,692		16,640,977		13,640,565
Diluted net income per share	$	0.33	$	0.26	$	0.66	$	0.51

Comprehensive Income — SFAS No. 130, “Reporting Comprehensive Income” describes comprehensive income as the total of all components of comprehensive income including net income. Other comprehensive income refers to revenues, expenses, gains and losses that under U.S. generally accepted accounting principles are included in comprehensive income but excluded from net income. Currently, Pinnacle Financial’s other comprehensive income consists of unrealized gains and losses, net of deferred income taxes, on securities available-for-sale.

Note 2.

Merger with Cavalry Bancorp, Inc.

On March 15, 2006, Pinnacle Financial consummated its merger with Cavalry, a one-bank holding company located in Murfreesboro, Tennessee. Pursuant to the merger agreement, Pinnacle acquired all of the outstanding shares of Cavalry common stock via a tax-free exchange whereby Cavalry shareholders received a fixed exchange ratio of 0.95 shares of Pinnacle Financial common stock for each share of Cavalry common stock, or approximately 6.9 million Pinnacle Financial shares. The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the activities of the former Cavalry since March 15, 2006.

In accordance with SFAS No. 141, “Accounting for Business Combinations” (“SFAS No. 141”), SFAS No. 142, “Goodwill and Intangible Assets” (“SFAS No. 142”) and SFAS No. 147, “Acquisition of Certain Financial Institutions” (“SFAS No. 147”), Pinnacle Financial recorded at fair value the following assets and liabilities of Cavalry as of March 15, 2006:

Page 7

Table of Contents

PINNACLE FINANCIAL PARTNERS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

Cash and cash equivalents	$	37,420,210
Investment securities – available-for-sale		39,476,178
Loans, net of an allowance for loan losses of $5,102,296		545,598,367
Goodwill		114,287,640
Core deposit intangible		13,168,236
Other assets		42,936,956
Total assets acquired		792,887,587

Deposits		583,992,422
Federal Home Loan Bank advances		17,766,661
Other liabilities		18,851,261
Total liabilities assumed		620,610,344
Total consideration paid for Cavalry	$	172,277,243

As shown in the table above, total consideration for Cavalry approximates $172.3 million of which $171.1 million was in the form of Pinnacle Financial common shares and options to acquire Pinnacle Financial common shares and $1.2 million in investment banking fees, attorney’s fees and other costs related to the acquisition which have been accounted for as a component of the purchase price. Pinnacle Financial issued 6,856,298 shares of Pinnacle Financial common stock to the former Cavalry shareholders. In accordance with EITF No. 99-12, “Determination of the Measurement Date for the Market Price of Acquirer Securities Issued in a Purchase Business Combination,” the consideration shares were valued at $24.53 per common share which represents the average closing price of Pinnacle Financial common stock from the two days prior to the merger announcement on September 30, 2005 through the two days after the merger announcement. Aggregate consideration for the common stock issued was approximately $168.2 million. Additionally, Pinnacle Financial also has assumed the Cavalry Bancorp, Inc. 1999 Stock Incentive Plan (the “Cavalry Plan”) pursuant to which Pinnacle is obligated to issue 195,551 shares of Pinnacle Financial common stock upon exercise of stock options awarded to certain former Cavalry employees who held outstanding options as of March 15, 2006. All of these options were fully vested prior to the merger announcement date and expire at various dates between 2011 and 2012. The exercise prices for these stock options range between $10.26 per share and $13.68 per share. In accordance with SFAS No. 141, Pinnacle Financial has considered the fair value of these options in determining the acquisition cost of Cavalry. The fair value of these vested options approximated $2.9 million which has been included as a component of the aggregate purchase price.

In accordance with SFAS Nos. 141 and 142, Pinnacle Financial recognized $13.2 million as a core deposit intangible in connection with its merger with Cavalry. This identified intangible is being amortized over seven years using an accelerated method which anticipates the life of the underlying deposits to which the intangible is attributable. For the six months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006, $1,032,000 and $647,000 of amortization, respectively, was recognized in the accompanying statement of income. Amortization expense associated with this identified intangible will approximate $1.8 million to $2.1 million per year for the next four years with lesser amounts for the remaining two years.

Pinnacle Financial also recorded other adjustments to the carrying value of Cavalry’s assets and liabilities in order to reflect the fair value of those net assets in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, including a $4.8 million discount associated with the loan portfolio, a $2.9 million premium for Cavalry’s certificates of deposit and a $4.6 million premium for Cavalry’s land and buildings. Pinnacle Financial also recorded the corresponding deferred tax assets or liabilities associated with these adjustments. The discounts and premiums related to financial assets and liabilities are being amortized into the statements of income using a method that approximates the level yield method over the anticipated lives of the underlying financial assets or liabilities. For the six months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006, the accretion of the fair value discounts related to the acquired loans and certificates of deposit increased net interest income by approximately $1,520,000 and $1,639,000, respectively. Based on the estimated useful lives of the acquired loans and deposits, Pinnacle Financial expects to recognize increases in net interest income related to accretion of these purchase accounting adjustments of $2.5 million for the remainder of 2007 and in subsequent years.

Statement of Position 03-03, Accounting for Certain Loans or Debt Securities Acquired in a Transfer (“SOP 03-03”) addresses accounting for differences between contractual cash flows and cash flows expected to be collected from an investor's initial investment in loans or debt securities (loans) acquired in a transfer if those differences are attributable, at least in part, to credit quality. It includes loans acquired in purchase business combinations and applies to all nongovernmental entities, including not-for-profit organizations. The SOP does not apply to loans originated by the entity. At March 15, 2006, Pinnacle Financial identified $3.9 million in loans to which the application of the provisions of SOP 03-03 was required. The purchase accounting adjustments reflect a reduction in loans and the allowance for loan losses of $1.0 million related to Cavalry’s impaired loans, thus reducing the carrying value of these loans to $2.9 million as of March 15, 2006. At June 30, 2007, the carrying value of these loans had been reduced to $903,000 due to cash payments received from the borrowers.

Page 8

Table of Contents

PINNACLE FINANCIAL PARTNERS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

The following pro forma income statements assume the merger was consummated on January 1, 2006 and purchase accounting adjustments began to be recorded at that time. The pro forma information does not reflect Pinnacle Financial’s results of operations that would have actually occurred had the merger been consummated on such date (dollars in thousands, except per share information).

	Six months ended June 30,
	2007		2006(1)
*Pro Forma Income Statements:*
Net interest income	$	34,737	$	32,775
Provision for loan losses		1,688		3,075
Noninterest income		10,577		8,825
Noninterest expense:
Compensation		17,061		14,519
Other noninterest expense		10,547		9,752
Net income before taxes		16,018		14,254
Income tax expense		4,995		6,075
Net income	$	11,023	$	8,179

*Pro Forma Per Share Information:*
Basic net income per common share	$	0.71	$	0.53
Diluted net income per common share	$	0.66	$	0.50

Weighted average shares outstanding:
Basic		15,494,522		15,314,194
Diluted		16,664,213		16,481,573

(1)

In preparation and as a result of the merger during 2006, Cavalry and Pinnacle Financial incurred significant merger related charges of approximately $10.6 million in the aggregate, primarily for severance benefits, accelerated vesting of defined compensation agreements, investment banker fees, etc. Including these charges would have decreased pro forma net income for the six months ended June 30, 2006 by $6.1 million resulting in net income of $2,080,000 and a basic and fully diluted net income per share of $0.14 and $0.13, respectively.

During the three and six months ended June 30, 2006, Pinnacle Financial incurred merger integration expense related to the merger with Cavalry of $921,000 and $1,365,000, respectively. These expenses were directly related to the merger, recognized as incurred and reflected on the accompanying consolidated statement of income as merger related expense.

Page 9

Table of Contents

PINNACLE FINANCIAL PARTNERS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

Note 3.

Securities

The amortized cost and fair value of securities available-for-sale and held-to-maturity at June 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006 are summarized as follows:

	June 30, 2007
	Amortized Cost		Gross Unrealized Gains		Gross Unrealized Losses		Fair Value
Securities available-for-sale:
U.S. Treasury securities	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-
U.S. government agency securities		37,088,067		-		748,524		36,339,543
Mortgage-backed securities		214,963,742		33,903		6,512,318		208,485,327
State and municipal securities		67,633,103		1,315		1,582,346		66,052,072
Corporate notes and other		1,886,814		-		50,987		1,835,827
	$	321,571,726	$	35,218	$	8,894,175	$	312,712,769
Securities held-to-maturity:
U.S. government agency securities	$	17,747,406	$	-	$	491,431	$	17,255,975
State and municipal securities		9,321,061		-		365,873		8,955,188
	$	27,068,467	$	-	$	857,304	$	26,211,163

	December 31, 2006
	Amortized Cost		Gross Unrealized Gains		Gross Unrealized Losses		Fair Value
Securities available-for-sale:
U.S. Treasury securities	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-
U.S. Government agency securities		38,076,428		9,739		457,321		37,628,846
Mortgage-backed securities		220,397,093		455,203		3,028,241		217,824,055
State and municipal securities		62,215,952		131,412		388,124		61,959,240
Corporate notes and other		1,887,475		-		62,188		1,825,287
	$	322,576,948	$	596,354	$	3,935,874	$	319,237,428
Securities held-to-maturity:
U.S. government agency securities	$	17,747,228	$	-	$	378,528	$	17,368,700
State and municipal securities		9,509,648		-		284,113		9,225,535
	$	27,256,876	$	-	$	662,641	$	26,594,235

At June 30, 2007, approximately $306,514,000 of Pinnacle Financial’s investment portfolio was pledged to secure public funds and other deposits and securities sold under agreements to repurchase.

Page 10

Table of Contents

PINNACLE FINANCIAL PARTNERS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

At June 30, 2007 and 2006, included in securities were the following investments with unrealized losses. The information below classifies these investments according to the term of the unrealized loss of less than twelve months or twelve months or longer:

	Investments with an Unrealized Loss of less than 12 months				Investments with an Unrealized Loss of 12 months or longer				Total Investments with an Unrealized Loss
	Fair Value		Unrealized Losses		Fair Value		Unrealized Losses		Fair Value		Unrealized Losses
At June 30, 2007:

U.S. government agency securities	$	5,942,800	$	56,794	$	47,652,718	$	1,183,161	$	53,595,518	$	1,239,955
Mortgage-backed securities		58,120,871		869,050		143,303,914		5,643,267		201,424,785		6,512,317
State and municipal securities		34,888,249		602,524		38,230,860		1,345,696		73,119,109		1,948,220
Corporate notes and other		-		-		1,835,827		50,987		1,835,827		50,987
Total temporarily-impaired securities	$	98,951,920	$	1,528,368	$	231,023,319	$	8,223,111	$	329,975,239	$	9,751,479

At December 31, 2006:

U.S. government agency securities	$	-	$	-	$	47,988,246	$	835,849	$	47,988,246	$	835,849
Mortgage-backed securities		13,959,080		68,965		149,496,521		2,959,276		163,455,601		3,028,241
State and municipal securities		13,975,595		47,071		35,660,379		625,166		49,635,974		672,237
Corporate notes and other		-		-		1,825,286		62,188		1,825,286		62,188
Total temporarily-impaired securities	$	27,934,675	$	116,036	$	234,970,432	$	4,482,479	$	262,905,107	$	4,598,515

Management evaluates securities for other-than-temporary impairment on at least a quarterly basis, and more frequently when economic or market concerns warrant such evaluation. Consideration is given to (1) the length of time and the extent to which the fair value has been less than cost, (2) the financial condition and near-term prospects of the issuer, and (3) the intent and ability of Pinnacle Financial to retain its investment in the issue for a period of time sufficient to allow for any anticipated recovery in fair value. Because the declines in fair value noted above were attributable to increases in interest rates and not attributable to credit quality and because Pinnacle Financial has the ability and intent to hold all of these investments until a market price recovery or maturity, the impairment of these investments is not deemed to be other-than-temporary.

Note 4.

Loans and Allowance for Loan Losses

The composition of loans at June 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006 is summarized as follows:

	*At June 30,*			*At December 31,*
	*2007*			*2006*

Commercial real estate – Mortgage	$	307,757,223		$	284,301,650
Commercial real estate – Construction		177,425,911			161,903,496
Commercial – Other		738,866,187			608,529,830
Total Commercial		1,224,049,321			1,054,734,976
Consumer real estate – Mortgage		288,325,366			299,626,769
Consumer real estate – Construction		102,998,286			91,193,738
Consumer – Other		47,656,968			52,179,341
Total Consumer		438,980,620			442,999,848
Total Loans		1,663,029,941			1,497,734,824
Allowance for loan losses		(17,375,408	)		(16,117,978	)
Loans, net	$	1,645,654,533		$	1,481,616,846

Page 11

Table of Contents

PINNACLE FINANCIAL PARTNERS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

Changes in the allowance for loan losses for the six months ended June 30, 2007 and for the year ended December 31, 2006 are as follows:

	June 30, 2007			December 31, 2006

Balance at beginning of period	$	16,117,978		$	7,857,774
Charged-off loans		(552,180	)		(818,467	)
Recovery of previously charged-off loans		121,646			244,343
Allowance acquired in acquisition of Cavalry (see note 2)		-			5,102,296
Provision for loan losses		1,687,964			3,732,032
Balance at end of period	$	17,375,408		$	16,117,978

At June 30, 2007 and at December 31, 2006, Pinnacle Financial had certain impaired loans on nonaccruing interest status. The principal balance of these nonaccrual loans amounted to $2,392,000 and $7,070,000 at June 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006, respectively. In each case, at the date such loans were placed on nonaccrual, Pinnacle Financial reversed all previously accrued interest income against current year earnings. Had nonaccruing loans been on accruing status, interest income would have been higher by $230,000 and $54,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively.

At June 30, 2007, Pinnacle Financial had granted loans and other extensions of credit amounting to approximately $23,598,000 to certain directors, executive officers, and their related entities, of which $14,137,000 had been drawn upon. During the six months ended June 30, 2007, $20,000 of new loans to certain directors, executive officers, and their related entities were made and repayments totaled $3,344,000. At December 31, 2006, Pinnacle Financial had granted loans and other extensions of credit amounting to approximately $29,942,000 to certain directors, executive officers, and their related entities, of which approximately $17,461,000 had been drawn upon. The terms of these loans and extensions are substantially the same terms customary for other persons for the type of loan involved. None of these loans to certain directors, executive officers, and their related entities, were impaired at June 30, 2007.

During the three and six months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006, Pinnacle Financial sold participations in certain loans to correspondent banks at an interest rate that was less than that of the borrower’s rate of interest. In accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, Pinnacle Financial recognized a net gain on the sale of these participated loans for the six months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006 of approximately $212,000 and $122,000, respectively, which is attributable to the present value of the future net cash flows of the difference between the interest payments the borrower is projected to pay Pinnacle Financial and the amount of interest that will be owed the correspondent bank based on their participation in the loans. At June 30, 2007, Pinnacle Financial was servicing $129 million of loans for correspondent banks and other entities, of which $116 million was commercial loans.

SFAS No. 156, “Accounting for Servicing of Financial Assets - an amendment of FASB Statement No. 140.” SFAS No. 156 requires an entity to recognize a servicing asset or servicing liability each time it undertakes a contractual obligation to service a financial asset in certain circumstances. All separately recognized servicing assets and servicing liabilities are required to be initially measured at fair value. Subsequent measurement methods include the amortization method, whereby servicing assets or servicing liabilities are amortized in proportion to and over the period of estimated net servicing income or net servicing loss, or the fair value method, whereby servicing assets or servicing liabilities are measured at fair value at each reporting date and changes in fair value are reported in earnings in the period in which they occur. If the amortization method is used, an entity must assess servicing assets or servicing liabilities for impairment or increased obligation based on the fair value at each reporting date. SFAS No. 156 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2006. Pinnacle Financial’s adoption of SFAS No. 156 did not have a material impact on the consolidated financial statements.

Note 5.

Income Taxes

FASB Interpretation 48, “Accounting for Income Tax Uncertainties” (“FIN 48”) was issued in June 2006 and defines the threshold for recognizing the benefits of tax return positions in the financial statements as “more-likely-than-not” to be sustained by the taxing authority. FIN 48 also provides guidance on the derecognition, measurement and classification of income tax uncertainties, along with any related interest and penalties and includes guidance concerning accounting for income tax uncertainties in interim periods. Pinnacle Financial adopted the provisions of FIN 48, on January 1, 2007, and determined there was no need to make an adjustment to retained earnings upon adoption of this Interpretation. As of January 1, 2007, Pinnacle Financial had $700,000 of unrecognized tax benefits related to Federal income tax matters. During the six months ended June 30, 2007, Pinnacle Financial reduced the amount of unrecognized tax benefits by $86,000, leaving $614,000 remaining, as the result of the resolution of certain uncertainties related to a prior year tax return. If ultimately recognized, this amount will reduce goodwill associated with the acquisition of Cavalry and therefore would not impact the Company’s effective tax rate. The Company does not anticipate any material increase or decrease in unrecognized tax benefits during 2007 relative to any tax positions taken prior to January 1, 2007.

Page 12

Table of Contents

PINNACLE FINANCIAL PARTNERS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

As of January 1, 2007, Pinnacle Financial has accrued no interest and no penalties related to uncertain tax positions. It is Pinnacle Financial’s policy to recognize interest and/or penalties related to income tax matters in income tax expense.

Pinnacle Financial and its subsidiaries file a consolidated U.S. Federal income tax return. The Company is currently open to audit under the statute of limitations by the Internal Revenue Service for the years ended December 31, 2003 through 2006. Pinnacle Financial and its subsidiaries’ state income tax returns are open to audit under the statute of limitations for the years ended December 31, 2002 through 2006.

Income tax expense attributable to income from continuing operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006 consists of the following:

	Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
	2007			2006			2007			2006
Current tax expense (benefit):
Federal	$	2,738,401		$	2,738,720		$	5,131,999		$	4,212,938
State		126,740			200,060			193,541			310,094
Total current tax expense (benefit)		2,865,141			2,938,780			5,325,540			4,523,032
Deferred tax expense (benefit):
Federal		(386,066	)		(667,940	)		(274,172	)		(979,266	)
State		(76,670	)		(129,953	)		(54,449	)		(176,119	)
Total deferred tax expense (benefit)		(462,736	)		(797,893	)		(328,621	)		(1,155,385	)
	$	2,402,405		$	2,140,887		$	4,996,919		$	3,367,647

Pinnacle Financial's income tax expense (benefit) differs from the amounts computed by applying the Federal income tax statutory rates of 35% in 2007 and 34% in 2006 to income before income taxes. A reconciliation of the differences for the three and six months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006 is as follows:

	Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
	2007			2006			2007			2006

Income taxes at statutory rate	$	2,739,894		$	2,262,176		$	5,608,618		$	3,605,706
State tax expense, net of federal tax effect		32,546			45,568			90,410			87,084
Federal tax credits		(90,000	)		(75,000	)		(180,000	)		(150,000	)
Tax-exempt securities		(202,123	)		(150,639	)		(398,730	)		(270,612	)
Insurance related items		(161,541	)		(41,607	)		(324,486	)		(54,351	)
Other items		83,629			100,389			201,106			149,820
Income tax expense	$	2,402,405		$	2,140,887		$	4,996,918		$	3,367,647

The effective tax rate for 2007 and 2006 is impacted by Federal tax credits related to the New Markets Tax Credit program whereby a subsidiary of Pinnacle National has been awarded approximately $2.3 million in future Federal tax credits which are available thru 2010. Tax benefits related to these credits will be recognized for financial reporting purposes in the same periods that the credits are recognized in the Company’s income tax returns. The credit that is available for the year ended December 31, 2007 is $360,000 and for the year ended December 31, 2006 is $300,000. Pinnacle Financial believes that it will comply with the various regulatory provisions of the New Markets Tax Credit program, and therefore has reflected the impact of the credits in its estimated annual effective tax rate for 2007 and 2006.

Page 13

Table of Contents

PINNACLE FINANCIAL PARTNERS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

The components of deferred income taxes included in other assets in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets at June 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006 are as follows:

	2007		2006
Deferred tax assets:
Allowance for loan losses	$	7,147,562	$	6,654,334
Loans		1,068,495		1,337,983
Securities		3,317,047		1,251,636
Accrued liability for supplemental retirement agreements		1,568,234		1,535,688
Deposits		405,848		585,568
Other deferred tax assets		349,517		340,296
		13,856,703		11,705,505
Deferred tax liabilities:
Depreciation and amortization		1,511,134		1,563,078
Core deposit intangible asset		4,068,467		4,473,076
FHLB dividends		837,744		770,156
Other deferred tax liabilities		586,771		440,642
		7,004,116		7,246,952
Net deferred tax assets	$	6,852,587	$	4,458,553

In assessing the realizability of deferred tax assets, management considers whether it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. The ultimate realization of deferred tax assets is dependent upon the generation of future taxable income during the periods in which those temporary differences become deductible. Management considers the scheduled reversal of deferred tax liabilities, projected future taxable income, and tax planning strategies in making this assessment. Based upon the level of historical taxable income and projections for future taxable income over the periods in which the deferred tax assets are deductible, management believes it is more likely than not that Pinnacle Financial will realize the benefit of these deductible differences. However, the amount of the deferred tax asset considered realizable could be reduced in the near term if estimates of future taxable income during the carryforward period are reduced.

Note 6.

Commitments and Contingent Liabilities

In the normal course of business, Pinnacle Financial has entered into off-balance sheet financial instruments which include commitments to extend credit (i.e., including unfunded lines of credit) and standby letters of credit. Commitments to extend credit are usually the result of lines of credit granted to existing borrowers under agreements that the total outstanding indebtedness will not exceed a specific amount during the term of the indebtedness. Typical borrowers are commercial concerns that use lines of credit to supplement their treasury management functions, thus their total outstanding indebtedness may fluctuate during any time period based on the seasonality of their business and the resultant timing of their cash flows. Other typical lines of credit are related to home equity loans granted to consumers. Commitments to extend credit generally have fixed expiration dates or other termination clauses and may require payment of a fee.

Standby letters of credit are generally issued on behalf of an applicant (our customer) to a specifically named beneficiary and are the result of a particular business arrangement that exists between the applicant and the beneficiary. Standby letters of credit have fixed expiration dates and are usually for terms of two years or less unless terminated beforehand due to criteria specified in the standby letter of credit. A typical arrangement involves the applicant routinely being indebted to the beneficiary for such items as inventory purchases, insurance, utilities, lease guarantees or other third party commercial transactions. The standby letter of credit would permit the beneficiary to obtain payment from Pinnacle Financial under certain prescribed circumstances. Subsequently, Pinnacle Financial would then seek reimbursement from the applicant pursuant to the terms of the standby letter of credit.

Pinnacle Financial follows the same credit policies and underwriting practices when making these commitments as it does for on-balance sheet instruments. Each customer’s creditworthiness is evaluated on a case-by-case basis, and the amount of collateral obtained, if any, is based on management’s credit evaluation of the customer. Collateral held varies but may include cash, real estate and improvements, marketable securities, accounts receivable, inventory, equipment, and personal property.

Page 14

Table of Contents

PINNACLE FINANCIAL PARTNERS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

The contractual amounts of these commitments are not reflected in the consolidated financial statements and would only be reflected if drawn upon. Since many of the commitments are expected to expire without being drawn upon, the contractual amounts do not necessarily represent future cash requirements. However, should the commitments be drawn upon and should our customers default on their resulting obligation to us, Pinnacle Financial's maximum exposure to credit loss, without consideration of collateral, is represented by the contractual amount of those instruments.

A summary of Pinnacle Financial's total contractual amount for all off-balance sheet commitments at June 30, 2007 is as follows:

	Commitments to extend credit	$ 542,953,929
	Standby letters of credit	62,979,736

At June 30, 2007, the fair value of Pinnacle Financial’s standby letters of credit was $211,000. This amount represents the unamortized fee associated with these standby letters of credit and is included in the consolidated balance sheet of Pinnacle Financial. This fair value will decrease over time as the existing standby letters of credit approach their expiration dates.

Various legal claims also arise from time to time in the normal course of business. As of June 30, 2007, management is not aware of any such proceedings against Pinnacle Financial.

Note 7.

Stock Option Plan and Restricted Shares

Pinnacle Financial has two equity incentive plans under which it has granted stock options to its employees to purchase common stock at or above the fair market value on the date of grant and granted restricted share awards to employees and directors. During the first quarter of 2006 and in connection with its merger with Cavalry, Pinnacle Financial assumed a third equity incentive plan, the 1999 Cavalry Bancorp, Inc. Stock Option Plan (the “Cavalry Plan”). All options granted under the Cavalry Plan were fully vested prior to Pinnacle Financial’s merger with Cavalry and expire at various dates between January 2011 and June 2012.

As of June 30, 2007, of the approximately 1,902,000 stock options outstanding, 1,225,000 of those options were granted with the intention to be incentive stock options qualifying under Section 422 of the Internal Revenue Code for favorable tax treatment to the option holder while 677,000 options would be deemed non-qualified stock options and thus not subject to favorable tax treatment to the option holder. All stock options under the plans vest in equal increments over five years from the date of grant and are exercisable over a period of ten years from the date of grant.

A summary of the activity within the three equity incentive plans during the six months ended June 30, 2007 and information regarding expected vesting, contractual terms remaining, intrinsic values and other matters was as follows:

Number

Weighted-

Average

Exercise

Price

Weighted-

Average

Contractual

Remaining Term

(in years)

Aggregate

Intrinsic

Value (1)

(000’s)

Outstanding at December 31, 2006

1,658,459

12.93

6.4

31,848

Granted

327,843

30.98

Exercised

(70,981

)

7.07

Forfeited

(13,188

)

29.43

Outstanding at June 30, 2007

1,902,133

17.12

6.6

24,262

Outstanding and expected to vest as of June 30, 2007

1,859,493

16.90

6.6

24,095

Options exercisable at June 30, 2007

1,028,479

8.80

4.9

21,149

(1)

The aggregate intrinsic value is calculated as the difference between the exercise price of the underlying awards and the quoted price of Pinnacle Financial common stock of $29.36 and $33.18 per common share for the approximately 1.3 million and 1.6 million options that were in-the-money at June 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006, respectively.

Page 15

Table of Contents

PINNACLE FINANCIAL PARTNERS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

During the six months ended June 30, 2007, 175,000 option awards vested at an average exercise price of $15.35 and an intrinsic value of approximately $2.4 million.

During the six months ended June 30, 2007, the aggregate intrinsic value of options exercised under the equity incentive plans was $1.66 million determined as of the date of option exercise. As of June 30, 2007, there was approximately $6.64 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested stock options granted under the equity incentive plans. That cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 4.0 years.

During the three and six months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006, Pinnacle Financial recorded stock-based compensation expense using the Black-Scholes valuation model for awards granted prior to, but not yet vested, as of January 1, 2006 and for stock-based awards granted after January 1, 2006. For these awards, Pinnacle Financial has recognized compensation expense using a straight-line amortization method. Stock-based compensation expense has been reduced for estimated forfeitures. The impact on the Company’s results of operations (compensation and employee benefits expense) and earnings per share of recording stock-based compensation in accordance with SFAS No. 123(R) (related to stock option awards) for the three and six months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006 was as follows:

	Three months ended June 30, 2007
	Awards granted with the intention to be classified as incentive stock options		Non-qualified stock option awards		Total		Three months ended June 30, 2006

Stock-based compensation expense	$	116,000	$	341,000	$	457,000	$	218,000
Deferred income tax benefit		-		134,000		134,000		8,000
Impact of stock-based compensation expense after deferred income tax benefit	$	116,000	$	207,000	$	323,000	$	210,000
Impact on earnings per share:
Basic	$	0.01	$	0.01	$	0.02	$	0.01
Fully diluted	$	0.01	$	0.01	$	0.02	$	0.01

	Six months ended June 30, 2007
	Awards granted with the intention to be classified as incentive stock options		Non-qualified stock option awards		Total		Six months ended June 30, 2006

Stock-based compensation expense	$	233,000	$	569,000	$	801,000	$	405,000
Deferred income tax benefit		-		223,000		223,000		42,000
Impact of stock-based compensation expense after deferred income tax benefit	$	233,000	$	346,000	$	578,000	$	363,000
Impact on earnings per share:
Basic	$	0.02	$	0.02	$	0.04	$	0.03
Fully diluted	$	0.01	$	0.02	$	0.03	$	0.03

For purposes of these calculations, the fair value of options granted for the six months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006 was estimated using the Black-Scholes option pricing model and the following assumptions:

	*2007*	*2006*

Risk free interest rate	4.63%	4.48%
Expected life of options	6.50 years	6.50 years
Expected dividend yield	0.00%	0.00%
Expected volatility	20.8%	23.6%
Weighted average fair value	$10.13	$9.61

Page 16

Table of Contents

PINNACLE FINANCIAL PARTNERS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

Pinnacle Financial’s computation of expected volatility is based on weekly historical volatility since September of 2002. Pinnacle Financial used the simplified method in determining the estimated life of stock option issuances. The risk free interest rate of the award is based on the closing market bid for U.S. Treasury securities corresponding to the expected life of the stock option issuances in effect at the time of grant.

Additionally, Pinnacle Financial’s 2004 Equity Incentive Plan provides for the granting of restricted share awards and other performance or market-based awards, such as stock appreciation rights. There were no market-based awards or stock appreciation rights outstanding as of June 30, 2007. During the six months ended June 30, 2007, Pinnacle Financial awarded 25,296 shares of restricted common stock to certain executives of Pinnacle Financial. Of these awards, 8,423 are considered granted for financial reporting purposes. The fair value of these awards as of the date of grant was $31.25 per share. The forfeiture restrictions on the restricted shares lapse in three separate traunches should Pinnacle Financial achieve certain earnings and soundness targets over the subsequent three year period. 16,873 of the shares awarded on June 30, 2007 are not yet deemed to be granted for financial reporting purposes because the key terms required to be achieved in order for the forfeiture restrictions to lapse have not yet been defined. These terms will be defined in the third quarter of 2007 at the conclusion of Pinnacle Financial’s usual strategic planning process.

Compensation expense associated with these restricted share awards is recognized over the time period that the restrictions associated with the awards lapse based on a graded vesting schedule such that each year’s traunche is amortized separately. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2007, Pinnacle Financial recognized approximately $16,000 and $122,000, respectively, in compensation costs attributable to all awards issued prior to June 30, 2007 to certain executives of Pinnacle Financial. During the six months ended June 30, 2007, $89,000 in previously expensed compensation associated with certain traunches of restricted share awards was reversed when Pinnacle Financial determined that the performance targets required to vest the awards were unlikely to be achieved. Accumulated compensation costs since the date these shares were awarded have amounted to approximately $872,000 through June 30, 2007.

During 2006, the Board of Directors of Pinnacle Financial awarded 4,400 shares of restricted common stock to the outside members of the board in accordance with their 2006 board compensation package, of which 400 were forfeited. On March 20, 2007, the Board of Directors of Pinnacle Financial awarded 3,230 shares of restricted common stock to the outside members of the board in accordance with their 2007 board compensation package. Each board member received an award of 323 shares. The restrictions on the shares issued in 2007 are expected to lapse on January 18, 2008 if each individual board member meets his or her attendance goals for the various board and board committee meetings to which each member is scheduled to attend during the year ended December 31, 2007. The fair value of these restricted share awards granted to our directors in 2007 as of the date of grant was $30.99 per share. For the six months ended June 30, 2007, Pinnacle Financial recognized approximately $35,000, in compensation costs attributable to these awards.

A summary of activity for restricted share awards for the six months ended June 30, 2007 follows:

	*Executive Management Awards*							*Board of Director Awards*
(number of share awards)	*Vested*		*Unvested*			*Totals*		*Vested*		*Unvested*			*Totals*

Balances at December 31, 2006		20,769		17,500			38,269		-		4,000			4,000
Granted		-		8,431			8,431		-		3,230			3,230
Forfeited		-		-			-		-		-			-
Vested		12,755		(12,755	)		-		4,000		(4,000	)		-
Balances at June 30, 2007		33,524		13,176			46,700		4,000		3,230			7,230

Page 17

Table of Contents

PINNACLE FINANCIAL PARTNERS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

A summary of compensation expense, net of the impact of income taxes, related to restricted stock awards for the three and six months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006, follows:

	Three months ended June 30,				Six months ended June 30,
	2007		2006		2007		2006

Stock-based compensation expense	$	16,000	$	34,000	$	122,000	$	127,000
Income tax benefit		6,000		13,000		47,000		50,000
Impact of stock-based compensation expense, net of income tax benefit	$	10,000	$	21,000	$	75,000	$	77,000
Impact on earnings per share:
Basic	$	0.00	$	0.00	$	0.00	$	0.01
Fully diluted	$	0.00	$	0.00	$	0.00	$	0.01

Note 8.

Regulatory Matters

Pinnacle National is subject to restrictions on the payment of dividends to Pinnacle Financial under Federal banking laws and the regulations of the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency. Pinnacle Financial is also subject to limits on payment of dividends to its shareholders by the rules, regulations and policies of Federal banking authorities. Pinnacle Financial has not paid any cash dividends since inception, and it does not anticipate that it will consider paying dividends until Pinnacle National generates sufficient capital from operations to support both anticipated asset growth and dividend payments.

Pinnacle Financial and Pinnacle National are subject to various regulatory capital requirements administered by Federal banking agencies. Failure to meet minimum capital requirements can initiate certain mandatory, and possibly additional discretionary actions, by regulators that, if undertaken, could have a direct material effect on the financial statements. Under capital adequacy guidelines and the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action, Pinnacle Financial and Pinnacle National must meet specific capital guidelines that involve quantitative measures of the assets, liabilities, and certain off-balance-sheet items as calculated under regulatory accounting practices. Pinnacle Financial’s and Pinnacle National’s capital amounts and classification are also subject to qualitative judgments by the regulators about components, risk weightings, and other factors.

Page 18

Table of Contents

PINNACLE FINANCIAL PARTNERS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

Quantitative measures established by regulation to ensure capital adequacy require Pinnacle Financial and Pinnacle National to maintain minimum amounts and ratios of Total and Tier I capital to risk-weighted assets and of Tier I capital to average assets. Management believes, as of June 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006, that Pinnacle Financial and Pinnacle National met all capital adequacy requirements to which they are subject. To be categorized as well-capitalized, Pinnacle National must maintain minimum Total risk-based, Tier I risk-based, and Tier I leverage ratios as set forth in the following table. Pinnacle Financial and Pinnacle National’s actual capital amounts and ratios are presented in the following table (dollars in thousands):

	Actual					Minimum Capital Requirement					Minimum To Be Well-Capitalized Under Prompt Corrective Action Provisions
	Amount		Ratio			Amount		Ratio			Amount		Ratio
At June 30, 2007

Total capital to risk weighted assets:
Pinnacle Financial	$	217,400		11.3	%	$	153,707		8.0	%	not applicable
Pinnacle National	$	194,373		10.1	%	$	153,431		8.0	%	$	191,754		10.0	%
Tier I capital to risk weighted assets:
Pinnacle Financial	$	200,025		10.4	%	$	76,854		4.0	%	not applicable
Pinnacle National	$	176,988		9.2	%	$	76,715		4.0	%	$	115,052		6.0	%
Tier I capital to average assets (*):
Pinnacle Financial	$	200,025		9.5	%	$	84,342		4.0	%	not applicable
Pinnacle National	$	176,988		8.4	%	$	84,381		4.0	%	$	105,477		5.0	%

At December 31, 2006

Total capital to risk weighted assets:
Pinnacle Financial	$	202,881	11.8	%	$	137,638	8.0	%	not applicable
Pinnacle National	$	175,159	10.2	%	$	137,340	8.0	%	$	171,676	10.0	%
Tier I capital to risk weighted assets:
Pinnacle Financial	$	186,763	10.9	%	$	68,819	4.0	%	not applicable
Pinnacle National	$	159,031	9.3	%	$	68,670	4.0	%	$	103,005	6.0	%
Tier I capital to average assets (*):
Pinnacle Financial	$	186,763	9.5	%	$	79,021	4.0	%	not applicable
Pinnacle National	$	159,031	8.1	%	$	79,056	4.0	%	$	98,820	5.0	%

(*) Average assets for the above calculations were based on the most recent quarter.

Note 9.

Business Segment Information

Pinnacle Financial has four reporting segments comprised of commercial banking, trust and investment services, mortgage origination and insurance services. Pinnacle Financial’s primary segment is commercial banking which consists of commercial loan and deposit services as well as the activities of Pinnacle National’s branch locations. Pinnacle Financial’s segments were changed in 2006 as a result of the acquisition of Cavalry to include Trust within the Investment Services segment and to add a new segment for Insurance Services. Trust and investment services include trust services offered by Pinnacle National and all brokerage and investment activities associated with Pinnacle Asset Management, an operating unit within Pinnacle National. Mortgage origination is also a separate unit within Pinnacle National and focuses on the origination of residential mortgage loans for sale to investors in the secondary residential mortgage market. Insurance Services reflect the activities of Pinnacle National’s wholly owned subsidiary, Miller and Loughry Insurance Services, Inc. Miller and Loughry is a general insurance agency located in Murfreesboro, Tennessee and is licensed to sell various commercial and consumer insurance products. The following tables present financial information for each reportable segment as of June 30, 2007 and 2006 and for the three and six months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006 (dollars in thousands):

Page 19

Table of Contents

PINNACLE FINANCIAL PARTNERS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

	Commercial Banking		Trust and Investment Services		Mortgage Origination		Insurance Services			Total Company
For the three months ended June 30, 2007:
Net interest income	$	17,661	$	-	$	-	$	-		$	17,661
Provision for loan losses		900		-		-		-			900
Noninterest income		2,851		1,122		949		630			5,552
Noninterest expense		12,558		816		643		467			14,484
Income tax expense		2,099		120		120		64			2,403
Net income	$	4,955	$	186	$	186	$	99		$	5,426

For the three months ended June 30, 2006:
Net interest income	$	16,898	$	-	$	-	$	(3	)	$	16,895
Provision for loan losses		1,707		-		-		-			1,707
Noninterest income		2,357		941		453		629			4,380
Noninterest expense		11,776		568		317		444			13,105
Income tax expense		1,854		148		55		84			2,141
Net income	$	3,918	$	225	$	81	$	98		$	4,322

	Commercial Banking		Trust and Investment Services		Mortgage Origination		Insurance Services		Total Company
For the six months ended June 30, 2007:
Net interest income	$	34,743	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	34,743
Provision for loan losses		1,688		-		-		-		1,688
Noninterest income		5,498		2,236		1,570		1,273		10,577
Noninterest expense		23,955		1,617		1,130		906		27,608
Income tax expense		4,433		243		173		147		4,996
Net income	$	10,165	$	376	$	267	$	220	$	11,028

For the six months ended June 30, 2006:
Net interest income	$	26,402	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	26,402
Provision for loan losses		2,094		-		-		-		2,094
Noninterest income		3,423		1,370		741		894		6,428
Noninterest expense		18,492		940		482		520		20,434
Income tax expense		2,937		169		102		160		3,368
Net income	$	6,302	$	261	$	157	$	214	$	6,934

As of June 30, 2007:
End of period assets	$	2,306,150	$	-	$	4,973	$	4,204	$	2,315,327
As of December 31, 2006:
End of period assets	$	2,132,615	$	-	$	5,654	$	3,918	$	2,142,187

Note 10.

Investments in Unconsolidated Subsidiaries and Other Entities

On December 29, 2003, the Company established PNFP Statutory Trust I; on September 15, 2005 the Company established PNFP Statutory Trust II; and on September 7, 2006 the Company established PNFP Statutory Trust III (“Trust I”; “Trust II”; “Trust III” or collectively, the “Trusts”). All are wholly-owned statutory business trusts. Pinnacle Financial is the sole sponsor of the Trusts and acquired each Trust’s common securities for $310,000, $619,000 and $619,000, respectively. The Trusts were created for the exclusive purpose of issuing 30-year capital trust preferred securities (“Trust Preferred Securities”) in the aggregate amount of $10,000,000 for Trust I; $20,000,000 for Trust II; and $20,000,000 for Trust III and using the proceeds to acquire junior subordinated debentures (“Subordinated Debentures”) issued by Pinnacle Financial. The sole assets of the Trusts are the Subordinated Debentures. Pinnacle Financial’s aggregate $1,548,000 investment in the Trusts is included in investments in unconsolidated subsidiaries and other entities in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet at June 30, 2007 and the $51,548,000 obligation of Pinnacle Financial is reflected as subordinated debt at June 30, 2007.

The Trust I Preferred Securities bear a floating interest rate based on a spread over 3-month LIBOR (8.16% at June 30, 2007) which is set each quarter and mature on December 30, 2033. The Trust II Preferred Securities bear a fixed interest rate of 5.848% per annum thru September 30, 2010 after which time the securities will bear a floating rate set each quarter based on a spread over 3-month LIBOR. The Trust II securities mature on September 30, 2035. The Trust III Preferred Securities bear a floating interest rate based on a spread over 3-month LIBOR (7.00% at June 30, 2007) which is set each quarter and mature on September 30, 2036.

Page 20

Table of Contents

PINNACLE FINANCIAL PARTNERS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

Distributions are payable quarterly. The Trust Preferred Securities are subject to mandatory redemption upon repayment of the Subordinated Debentures at their stated maturity date or their earlier redemption in an amount equal to their liquidation amount plus accumulated and unpaid distributions to the date of redemption. Pinnacle Financial guarantees the payment of distributions and payments for redemption or liquidation of the Trust Preferred Securities to the extent of funds held by the Trusts. Pinnacle Financial’s obligations under the Subordinated Debentures together with the guarantee and other back-up obligations, in the aggregate, constitute a full and unconditional guarantee by Pinnacle Financial of the obligations of the Trusts under the Trust Preferred Securities.

The Subordinated Debentures are unsecured; bear interest at a rate equal to the rates paid by the Trusts on the Trust Preferred Securities and mature on the same dates as those noted above for the Trust Preferred Securities. Interest is payable quarterly. Pinnacle Financial may defer the payment of interest at any time for a period not exceeding 20 consecutive quarters provided that the deferral period does not extend past the stated maturity. During any such deferral period, distributions on the Trust Preferred Securities will also be deferred and Pinnacle Financial’s ability to pay dividends on our common shares will be restricted.

Subject to approval by the Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta, the Trust Preferred Securities may be redeemed prior to maturity at the Company’s option on or after September 17, 2008 for Trust I; on or after September 30, 2010 for Trust II and September 30, 2011 for Trust III. The Trust Preferred Securities may also be redeemed at any time in whole (but not in part) in the event of unfavorable changes in laws or regulations that result in (1) the Trust becoming subject to Federal income tax on income received on the Subordinated Debentures, (2) interest payable by the parent company on the Subordinated Debentures becoming non-deductible for Federal tax purposes, (3) the requirement for the Trust to register under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended, or (4) loss of the ability to treat the Trust Preferred Securities as “Tier I capital” under the Federal Reserve capital adequacy guidelines.

The Trust Preferred Securities for the Trusts qualify as Tier I capital under current regulatory definitions subject to certain limitations. Debt issuance costs associated with Trust I of $105,000 consisting primarily of underwriting discounts and professional fees are included in other assets in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet. These debt issuance costs are being amortized over ten years using the straight-line method. There were no debt issuance costs associated with Trust II or Trust III.

Combined summary financial information for the Trusts follows (dollars in thousands) at June 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006 and for the six months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006:

Combined Summary Balance Sheets

	June 30, 2007		December 31, 2006
*Asset*– Investment in subordinated debentures issued by Pinnacle Financial	$	51,548	$	51,548

*Liabilities*	$	-	$	-

*Stockholder’s equity*– Trust preferred securities		50,000		50,000
Common securities (100% owned by Pinnacle Financial)		1,548		1,548
Total stockholder’s equity		51,548		51,548
*Total liabilities and stockholder’s equity*	$	51,548	$	51,548

Combined Summary Income Statements

	Six months ended June 30,
	2007		2006
*Income –* Interest income from subordinated debentures issued by Pinnacle Financial	$	1,754	$	1,001
*Net Income*	$	1,754	$	1,001

Page 21

Table of Contents

PINNACLE FINANCIAL PARTNERS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

Combined Summary Statements of Stockholder’s Equity

	Trust Preferred Securities		Total Common Stock		Retained Earnings			Stockholder’s Equity
*Balances, December 31, 2005*	$	30,000	$	929	$	-		$	30,929
Net income		-		-		1,001			1,001
Dividends:
Trust preferred securities		-		-		(986	)		(986	)
Common paid to Pinnacle Financial		-		-		(15	)		(15	)
*Balances, June 30, 2006*	$	30,000	$	929	$	-		$	30,929

*Balances, December 31, 2006*	$	50,000	$	1,548	$	-		$	51,548
Net income		-		-		1,754			1,754
Issuance of trust preferred securities
Dividends:
Trust preferred securities		-		-		(1,721	)		(1,721	)
Common paid to Pinnacle Financial		-		-		(33	)		(33	)
*Balances, June 30, 2007*	$	50,000	$	1,548	$	-		$	51,548

In addition, the Company has investments in other entities which totaled approximately $889,000 and $66,000 at June 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006, respectively. These investments are reported at fair value.

Page 22

Table of Contents

ITEM 2.

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The following is a discussion of our financial condition at June 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006 and our results of operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006. The purpose of this discussion is to focus on information about our financial condition and results of operations which is not otherwise apparent from the consolidated financial statements. The following discussion and analysis should be read along with our consolidated financial statements and the related notes included elsewhere herein.

Overview

General. Our rapid growth from inception through the first half of 2007 has had a material impact on our financial condition and results of operations. This rapid growth resulted in fully diluted net income per share for the three months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006 of $0.33 and $0.26, respectively, and for the six months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006 of $0.66 and $0.51, respectively. At June 30, 2007, loans totaled $1.663 billion, as compared to $1.498 billion at December 31, 2006, while total deposits increased to $1.798 billion at June 30, 2007 compared to $1.622 billion at December 31, 2006.

Acquisition. On March 15, 2006, we consummated our merger with Cavalry. Pursuant to the merger agreement, we acquired all Cavalry common stock via a tax-free exchange whereby Cavalry shareholders received a fixed exchange ratio of 0.95 shares of our common stock for each share of Cavalry common stock, or approximately 6.9 million Pinnacle Financial shares. The financial information herein includes the activities of the former Cavalry (the “Rutherford County market”) since March 15, 2006.

In accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 141, “Accounting for Business Combinations” (“SFAS No. 141”), SFAS No. 142, “Goodwill and Intangible Assets” (“SFAS No. 142”) and SFAS No. 147, “Acquisition of Certain Financial Institutions” (“SFAS No. 147”), we recorded at fair value the following assets and liabilities of Cavalry as of March 15, 2006 (dollars in thousands):

Cash and cash equivalents	$	37,420
Investment securities – available-for-sale		39,476
Loans, net of an allowance for loan losses of $5,102		545,598
Goodwill		114,288
Core deposit intangible		13,168
Other assets		42,937
Total assets acquired		792,887

Deposits		583,992
Federal Home Loan Bank advances		17,767
Other liabilities		18,851
Total liabilities assumed		620,610
Total consideration paid for Cavalry	$	172,277

As noted above, total consideration for Cavalry approximates $172.3 million of which $171.1 million was in the form of our common shares and options to acquire our common shares and $1.2 million in investment banking fees, attorney’s fees and other costs related to the purchase of Cavalry. We issued 6,856,298 shares of our common stock to the former Cavalry shareholders. In accordance with EITF 99-12, “Determination of the Measurement Date for the Market Price of Acquirer Securities Issued in a Purchase Business Combination,” the shares were valued at $24.53 per common share which represents the average closing price of our common stock from the two days prior to the merger announcement on September 30, 2005 through the two days after the merger announcement. Aggregate consideration for the common stock issued was approximately $168.2 million. Additionally, we also have assumed the Cavalry Bancorp, Inc. 1999 Stock Incentive Plan (the “Cavalry Plan”) pursuant to which we were obligated to issue 195,551 shares of our common stock upon exercise of stock options awarded to certain former Cavalry employees who held outstanding options as of March 15, 2006. All of these options were fully vested prior to the merger announcement date and expire at various dates between 2011 and 2012. The exercise prices for these stock options range between $10.26 per share and $13.68 per share. In accordance with SFAS No. 141, we considered the fair value of these options in determining the acquisition cost of Cavalry. The fair value of these vested options approximated $2.9 million which has been included as a component of the aggregate purchase price.

Page 23

Table of Contents

In accordance with SFAS Nos. 141 and 142, we recognized $13.2 million as a core deposit intangible in connection with our merger with Cavalry. This identified intangible is being amortized over seven years using an accelerated method which anticipates the life of the underlying deposits to which the intangible is attributable. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2007, approximately $516,000 and $1,032,000, respectively, of amortization was recognized in the statement of income compared to $516,000 and $647,000 for the three and six months ended June 30, 2006. Amortization expense associated with the core deposit intangible will approximate $1.8 million to $2.1 million per year for the next four years with lesser amounts for the remaining two years.

We also recorded other adjustments to the carrying value of Cavalry’s assets and liabilities in order to reflect the fair value of those net assets in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, including a $4.8 million discount associated with the loan portfolio, a $2.9 million premium for Cavalry’s certificates of deposit and a $4.6 million premium for Cavalry’s land and buildings. We have also recorded the corresponding deferred tax assets or liabilities associated with these adjustments. The discounts and premiums related to financial assets and liabilities will be amortized into our statements of income in future periods using a method that approximates the level yield method over the anticipated lives of the underlying financial assets or liabilities. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2007, the accretion of the fair value discounts related to the acquired loans and certificates of deposit increased net interest income by approximately $687,000 and $1,520,000 respectively, compared to $1,208,000 and $1,639,000 for the three and six months ended June 30, 2006, respectively. Based on the estimated useful lives of the acquired loans and deposits, we expect to recognize increases in net interest income related to accretion of these purchase accounting adjustments of $2.5 million for the remainder of 2007 and in subsequent years.

We also incurred approximately $921,000 and $1,365,000 in merger related expenses during the three and six months ended June 30, 2006, respectively, directly related to the Cavalry merger. These charges were for our integration of Cavalry and accelerated depreciation and amortization related to software and other technology assets whose useful lives were shortened as a result of the Cavalry acquisition. We do not anticipate any merger related expenses associated with the Cavalry merger in 2007.

Knoxville, Tennessee Expansion. On April 9, 2007, we announced our plans to expand to the Knoxville, Tennessee, market and the hiring of two prominent veteran bankers to lead our firm in Knoxville. We have estimated that our expansion into Knoxville will result in a reduction in our net income for 2007 as we hire new associates in that market and build out our initial branch network. Our current estimates are that our Knoxville expansion will negatively impact our diluted earnings per share by $0.08 in 2007.

Results of Operations. Our net interest income increased to $17.7 million for the second quarter of 2007 compared to $16.9 million for the second quarter of 2006. The net interest margin (the ratio of net interest income to average earning assets) for the three months ended June 30, 2007 was 3.58% compared to 4.17% for the same period in 2006. Our net interest income increased to $34.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2007 compared to $26.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2006. The net interest margin for the six months ended June 30, 2007 was 3.61% compared to 3.97% for the same period in 2006.

Our provision for loan losses was $900,000 for the second quarter of 2007 compared to $1.7 million for the same period in 2006. The provision for loan losses was $1.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2007 compared to $2.1 million for the same period in 2006. Impacting the provision for loan losses in any accounting period are several matters including the amount of loan growth during the period, the level of charge-offs or recoveries incurred during the period, the results of our quarterly assessment of the inherent risks of our loan portfolio and the impact of the assessment on the level of the allowance for loan losses.

Noninterest income for the second quarter of 2007 compared to the same time period in 2006 increased by $1.2 million or 26.7%. For the first six months of 2007, noninterest income was $4.1 million greater than the first six months of 2006. These increases are largely attributable to the fee businesses associated with the Cavalry acquisition, particularly with regard to service charges on deposit accounts, insurance sales commissions and trust fees.

Our continued growth during 2007 resulted in increased noninterest expense compared to 2006 due to the addition of the Rutherford County market, increases in salaries and employee benefits, equipment and occupancy expenses and other operating expenses. The number of full-time equivalent employees increased from 359.0 at June 30, 2006 to 441.0 at June 30, 2007. We expect to add additional employees throughout 2007 which will cause our compensation and employee benefit expense to increase in 2007. Additionally, our branch expansion efforts and our recently announced expansion into the Knoxville, Tennessee market will result in increased operating expenses in the future.

Page 24

Table of Contents

Our efficiency ratio (the ratio of noninterest expense to the sum of net interest income and noninterest income) was 62.4% for the second quarter of 2007 compared to 61.60% for the same period in 2006. Our efficiency ratio was 60.9% for the six months ended June 30, 2007 compared to 62.2% for the same period in 2006.

The effective income tax expense rate for the three and six months ended June 30, 2007 was approximately 30.7% and 31.2%, respectively, compared to an effective income tax expense rate for the three and six months ended June 30, 2006 of approximately 33.1% and 32.7%, respectively. The slight decrease in the effective tax rate between the two periods was due to increased bank owned life insurance acquired with the Cavalry acquisition and other tax initiatives.

Net income for the second quarter of 2007 was $5.4 million compared to $4.3 million for the same period in 2006, an increase of 25.5%. Net income for the first six months of 2007 was $11.0 million compared to $6.9 million for the same period in 2006, an increase of 59.0%.

Financial Condition. Loans increased $165.3 million during the first six months of 2007. As we seek to increase our loan portfolio, we must also continue to monitor the risks inherent in our lending operations. If our allowance for loan losses is not sufficient to cover the estimated loan losses in our loan portfolio, increases to the allowance for loan losses would be required which would decrease our earnings.

We have successfully grown our total deposits to $1.798 billion at June 30, 2007 compared to $1.622 billion at December 31, 2006, an increase of $176.1 million. This growth in deposits had a higher funding cost due to rising rates and increased deposit pricing competition in 2007 compared to 2006. We typically adjust our loan yields at a faster rate than we adjust our deposit rates in an environment where short term rates are increasing. As such, unless competitive pressures dictate, our deposit funding costs do not usually adjust as quickly as do revenues from interest income on floating rate earning assets when short term rates are increasing.

Capital and Liquidity. At June 30, 2007, our capital ratios, including our bank’s capital ratios, met regulatory minimum capital requirements. Additionally, at June 30, 2007, our bank would be considered to be “well-capitalized” pursuant to banking regulations. As our bank grows it will require additional capital from us over that which can be earned through operations. At June 30, 2007, Pinnacle Financial had $18.8 million in capital that could be transferred to Pinnacle National in order to continue to meet capital requirements. We anticipate that we will continue to use various capital raising techniques in order to support the growth of our bank.

In the past, we have been successful in procuring additional capital from the capital markets (via public and private offerings of trust preferred securities and common stock). This additional capital was required to support our growth. As of June 30, 2007, we believe we have sufficient capital to support our current growth plans, including our expansion into the Knoxville market. However, expansion by acquisition of other banks or by branching into a new geographic market could result in issuance of additional capital, including additional common shares or trust preferred securities.

We continue to believe there is broad acceptance of our business model and in our target markets of small to mid-sized businesses and affluent clients, real estate professionals and consumers that desire a deep relationship with their bank.

Critical Accounting Estimates

The accounting principles we follow and our methods of applying these principles conform with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles and with general practices within the banking industry. In connection with the application of those principles, we have made judgments and estimates which, in the case of the determination of our allowance for loan losses, the application of SFAS No. 123 (revised 2004), “Share Based Payments” (“SFAS No. 123(R)”) and the assessment of impairment of the intangibles resulting from the Cavalry merger have been critical to the determination of our financial position and results of operations.

Allowance for Loan Losses (“allowance”). Our management assesses the adequacy of the allowance prior to the end of each calendar quarter. This assessment includes procedures to estimate the allowance and test the adequacy and appropriateness of the resulting balance. The level of the allowance is based upon management’s evaluation of the loan portfolios, past loan loss experience, known and inherent risks in the portfolio, adverse situations that may affect the borrower’s ability to repay (including the timing of future payment), the estimated value of any underlying collateral, composition of the loan portfolio, economic conditions, industry and peer bank loan quality indications and other pertinent factors. This evaluation is inherently subjective as it requires material estimates including the amounts and timing of future cash flows expected to be received on impaired loans that may be susceptible to significant change. Loan losses are charged off when management believes that the full collectability of the loan is unlikely. A loan may be partially charged-off after a “confirming event” has occurred which serves to validate that full repayment pursuant to the terms of the loan is unlikely. Allocation of the allowance may be made for specific loans, but the entire allowance is available for any loan that, in management’s judgment, is deemed to be uncollectible.

Page 25

Table of Contents

Larger balance commercial and commercial real estate loans are impaired when, based on current information and events, it is probable that we will be unable to collect all amounts due according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement. Collection of all amounts due according to the contractual terms means that both the contractual interest payments and the contractual principal payments of a loan will be collected as scheduled in the loan agreement.

An impairment loss is recognized if the present value of expected future cash flows from the loan is less than the recorded investment in the loan (recorded investment in the loan is the principal balance plus any accrued interest, net deferred loan fees or costs and unamortized premium or discount, and does not reflect any direct write-down of the investment). The impairment loss is recognized through the allowance. Loans that are impaired are recorded at the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate, or if the loan is collateral dependent, impairment measurement is based on the fair value of the collateral, less estimated disposal costs. Income is recognized on impaired loans on a cash basis.

The level of allowance maintained is believed by management to be adequate to absorb losses inherent in the portfolio at the balance sheet date. The allowance is increased by provisions charged to expense and decreased by charge-offs, net of recoveries of amounts previously charged-off.

In assessing the adequacy of the consolidated allowance, we also consider the results of our ongoing independent loan review process. We undertake this process both to ascertain whether there are loans in the portfolio whose credit quality has weakened over time and to assist in our overall evaluation of the risk characteristics of the entire loan portfolio. Our loan review process includes the judgment of management, the input from our independent loan reviewer, and reviews that may have been conducted by bank regulatory agencies as part of their usual examination process. We incorporate loan review results in the determination of whether or not it is probable that we will be able to collect all amounts due according to the contractual terms of a loan.

As part of management’s quarterly assessment of the allowance, management divides the loan portfolio into four segments: commercial, commercial real estate, consumer and consumer real estate. Each segment is then analyzed such that an allocation of the allowance is estimated for each loan segment.

The allowance allocation for commercial and commercial real estate loans begins with a process of estimating the probable losses inherent for these types of loans. The estimates for these loans are established by category and based on our internal system of credit risk ratings and historical loss data for industry and various peer bank groups. The estimated loan loss allocation rate for our internal system of credit risk grades for commercial and commercial real estate is based on management’s experience with similarly graded loans, discussions with banking regulators and our internal loan review processes. We then weight the allocation methodologies for the commercial and commercial real estate portfolios and determine a weighted average allocation for these portfolios.

The allowance allocation for consumer and consumer real estate loans which includes installment, home equity, consumer mortgages, automobiles and others is established for each of the categories by estimating losses inherent in that particular category of consumer and consumer real estate loans. The estimated loan loss allocation rate for each category is based on management’s experience. Additionally, consumer and consumer real estate loans are analyzed based on our actual loss rates, industry loss rates and loss rates of various peer bank groups. Consumer and consumer real estate loans are evaluated as a group by category (i.e. retail real estate, installment, etc.) rather than on an individual loan basis because these loans are smaller and homogeneous. We weight the allocation methodologies for the consumer and consumer real estate portfolios and determine a weighted average allocation for these portfolios.

The estimated loan loss allocation for all four loan portfolio segments is then adjusted for management’s estimate of probable losses for several “environmental” factors. The allocation for environmental factors is particularly subjective and does not lend itself to exact mathematical calculation. This amount represents estimated inherent credit losses which may exist, but have not yet been identified, as of the balance sheet date based upon quarterly trend assessments in delinquent and nonaccrual loans, unanticipated charge-offs, credit concentration changes, prevailing economic conditions, changes in lending personnel experience, changes in lending policies or procedures and other influencing factors. These environmental factors are considered for each of the four loan segments and the allowance allocation as determined by the processes noted above for each segment is increased or decreased based on the incremental assessment of these various “environmental” factors.

Page 26

Table of Contents

We then test the resulting allowance balance by comparing the balance in the allowance to historical trends and industry and peer information. Our management then evaluates the result of the procedures performed, including the result of our testing, and concludes on the appropriateness of the balance of the allowance in its entirety. The audit committee of our board of directors reviews the assessment prior to the filing of quarterly and annual financial information.

As of June 30, 2006 and March 31, 2006, we assessed the allowance in two separate processes using methodologies for both the Pinnacle portfolios as the portfolios existed prior to the merger with Cavalry (the “Nashville market”) and the Rutherford County portfolio. Our methodology for the first two quarters of 2006 was consistent with the past methodologies of Pinnacle Financial and Cavalry on a stand-alone basis. In view of the acquisition, we evaluated the respective assessment methodologies and made certain changes as noted above and implemented such changes during the third quarter of 2006. The revised assessment methodology did not significantly impact our recorded allowance for loan losses.

Share Based Payments – Our stock compensation is subject to financial accounting standards that required us to assess numerous factors including the historical volatility of our stock price, anticipated option forfeitures and estimates concerning the length of time that our options would remain unexercised. Many of these assessments impact the fair value of the underlying stock option more significantly than others and changes to these assessments in future periods could be significant.

Impairment of Intangible Assets - Long-lived assets, including purchased intangible assets subject to amortization, such as our core deposit intangible asset, are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. Recoverability of assets to be held and used is measured by a comparison of the carrying amount of an asset to estimated undiscounted future cash flows expected to be generated by the asset. If the carrying amount of an asset exceeds its estimated future cash flows, an impairment charge is recognized by the amount by which the carrying amount of the asset exceeds the fair value of the asset. Assets to be disposed of would be separately presented in the balance sheet and reported at the lower of the carrying amount or fair value less costs to sell, and are no longer depreciated.

Goodwill and intangible assets that have indefinite useful lives are tested annually for impairment, and are tested for impairment more frequently if events and circumstances indicate that the asset might be impaired. An impairment loss is recognized to the extent that the carrying amount exceeds the asset’s fair value. Our annual assessment date is September 30. Should we determine in a future period that the goodwill recorded in connection with our acquisition of Cavalry has been impaired, then a charge to our earnings will be recorded in the period such determination is made.

Page 27

Table of Contents

Results of Operations

Our results for the three and six months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006 were highlighted by the continued growth in loans and other earning assets and deposits, which resulted in increased revenues and expenses. The following is a summary of our results of operations (dollars in thousands):

	*Three months ended*				*2007-2006*			*Six months ended*				*2007-2006*
	*June 30,*				*Percent*			*June 30,*				*Percent*
	*2007*		*2006*		*Increase(decrease)*			*2007*		*2006*		*Increase(decrease)*

Interest income	$	35,508	$	28,305		25.4	%	$	69,247	$	45,115		53.5	%
Interest expense		17,847		11,410		56.4	%		34,504		18,713		84.4	%
Net interest income		17,661		16,895		4.5	%		34,743		26,402		31.6	%
Provision for loan losses		900		1,707		(47.3	%)		1,688		2,094		(19.4	%)
Net interest income after provision for loan losses		16,761		15,188		10.4	%		33,055		24,308		36.0	%
Noninterest income		5,551		4,380		26.7	%		10,578		6,428		64.6	%
Noninterest expense:
Merger related expense		-		921		(100.0	%)		-		1,365		(100.0	%)
Other noninterest expense		14,484		12,184		18.9	%		27,608		19,069		44.8	%
Net income before income taxes		7,828		6,463		21.1	%		16,025		10,302		55.6	%
Income tax expense		2,402		2,141		12.2	%		4,997		3,368		48.4	%
Net income	$	5,426	$	4,322		25.5	%	$	11,028	$	6,934		59.0	%

Net Interest Income. Net interest income represents the amount by which interest earned on various earning assets exceeds interest paid on deposits and other interest bearing liabilities and is the most significant component of our earnings. For the three months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006, we recorded net interest income of $17,661,000, and $16,895,000 respectively, which resulted in a net interest margin of 3.58% and 4.17%. For the six months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006, we recorded net interest income of $34,743,000 and $26,402,000 which resulted in a net interest margin of 3.61% and 3.97% respectively.

The following table sets forth the amount of our average balances, interest income or interest expense for each category of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities and the average interest rate for total interest-earning assets and total interest-bearing liabilities, net interest spread and net interest margin for the three and six months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006 (dollars in thousands):

Page 28

Table of Contents

(dollars in thousands)	*Three months ended* *June 30, 2007*							*Three months ended* *June 30, 2006*
	*Average Balances*		*Interest*		*Rates/ Yields*			*Average Balances*		*Interest*		*Rates/ Yields*
*Interest-earning assets*:
Loans	$	1,598,967	$	30,556		7.66	%	$	1,328,121	$	24,246		7.32	%
Securities:
Taxable		272,024		3,394		5.00	%		248,682		3,148		5.08	%
Tax-exempt (1)		75,057		693		4.89	%		50,227		495		5.21	%
Federal funds sold and other		58,836		865		6.08	%		24,932		416		7.09	%
Total interest-earning assets		2,004,884		35,508		7.15	%		1,651,962		28,305		6.92	%
*Nonearning assets*		224,343							226,950
Total assets	$	2,229,227						$	1,878,912

*Interest-bearing liabilities:*
Interest bearing deposits
Interest checking	$	254,171	$	2,147		3.39	%	$	190,055	$	848		1.79	%
Savings and money market		501,373		4,239		3.39	%		434,094		3,234		2.99	%
Certificates of deposit		646,251		8,071		5.01	%		546,715		5,481		4.02	%
Total interest bearing deposits		1,401,795		14,457		4.14	%		1,170,864		9,563		3.28	%
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase		172,872		1,891		4.39	%		68,079		678		4.00	%
Federal Home Loan Bank advances and other borrowings		47,998		621		5.19	%		48,113		653		5.44	%
Subordinated debt		51,548		878		6.84	%		30,929		516		6.69	%
Total interest-bearing liabilities		1,674,213		17,847		4.28	%		1,317,985		11,410		3.47	%
*Noninterest-bearing deposits*		276,241		-		-			311,286		-		-
Total deposits and interest-bearing liabilities		1,950,454		17,847		3.67	%		1,629,271		11,410		2.81	%
Other liabilities		14,718							15,241
*Stockholders' equity*		264,055							234,400
	$	2,229,227						$	1,878,912
*Net* *interest* *income*			$	17,661						$	16,895
Net interest spread (2)						2.88	%						3.45	%
Net interest margin (3)						3.58	%						4.17	%

(1)

Yields computed on tax-exempt instruments on a tax equivalent basis.

(2)

Yields realized on interest-earning assets less the rates paid on interest-bearing liabilities.

(3)

Net interest margin is the result of annualized net interest income calculated on a tax-equivalent basis divided by average interest-earning assets for the period.

Page 29

Table of Contents

(dollars in thousands)	*Six months ended* *June 30, 2007*							*Six months ended* *June 30, 2006*
	*Average Balances*		*Interest*		*Rates/ Yields*			*Average Balances*		*Interest*		*Rates/ Yields*
*Interest-earning assets*:
Loans	$	1,564,869	$	59,533		7.67	%	$	1,044,724	$	37,425		7.22	%
Securities:
Taxable		272,346		6,740		4.99	%		245,216		6,009		4.94	%
Tax-exempt (1)		74,009		1,363		4.90	%		47,399		896		5.04	%
Federal funds sold and other		57,367		1,611		5.66	%		26,085		785		6.45	%
Total interest-earning assets		1,968,591		69,247		7.14	%		1,363,424		45,115		6.72	%
*Nonearning assets*		220,987							152,944
Total assets	$	2,189,578						$	1,516,368

*Interest-bearing liabilities:*
Interest bearing deposits
Interest checking	$	249,425	$	4,104		3.32	%	$	147,089	$	1,330		1.82	%
Savings and money market		498,625		8,364		3.38	%		389,473		5,574		2.89	%
Certificates of deposit		635,172		15,526		4.93	%		430,854		8,509		3.98	%
Total interest bearing deposits		1,383,222		27,994		4.08	%		967,416		15,413		3.21	%
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase		165,026		3,603		4.40	%		63,901		1,187		3.75	%
Federal Home Loan Bank advances and other borrowings		44,120		1,152		5.04	%		47,412		1,112		4.73	%
Subordinated debt		51,548		1,755		6.86	%		30,929		1,001		6.53	%
Total interest-bearing liabilities		1,643,916		34,504		4.23	%		1,109,658		18,713		3.40	%
*Noninterest-bearing deposits*		273,052		-		-			231,767		-		-
Total deposits and interest-bearing liabilities		1,916,968		34,504		3.63	%		1,341,425		18,713		2.81	%
Other liabilities		10,849							9,976
*Stockholders' equity*		261,761							164,967
	$	2,189,578						$	1,516,368
*Net* *interest* *income*			$	34,743						$	26,402
Net interest spread (2)						2.91	%						3.32	%
Net interest margin (3)						3.61	%						3.97	%

(1)

Yields computed on tax-exempt instruments on a tax equivalent basis.

(2)

Yields realized on interest-earning assets less the rates paid on interest-bearing liabilities.

(3)

Net interest margin is the result of annualized net interest income calculated on a tax-equivalent basis divided by average interest-earning assets for the period.

Page 30

Table of Contents

As noted above, the net interest margin for the three and six months ended June 30, 2007 was 3.58% and 3.61%, respectively, compared to a net interest margin of 4.17% and 3.97% for the same periods in 2006. In comparing the decreases in the net interest margins between the three months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006 and the six months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006, the primary cause of the decreased margins was due to the higher rate of increase for funding costs over the increased rates for interest earning assets. When comparing the three months ended June 30, 2007 to the same period in 2006, funding costs increased by 86 basis points while interest earning assets increased only 23 basis points. The comparison for the six month periods had similar results with funding costs up 82 basis points while interest earning assets increasing by only 42 basis points. We believe substantially all small cap community banks are experiencing similar trends across the country. However, for Pinnacle, our absolute growth in average earning asset balances, primarily loan balances, has been enough to overcome the negative trends in rates such that we experienced a 4.5% increase in net interest income comparing the three months ended June 30, 2007 to the same period in 2006 and 31.6% increase when comparing the six months ended June 30, 2007 to the same period in 2006.

Other matters related to the changes in net interest income, net interest yields and rates, and net interest margin are presented below:

Our loan yields increased between 2007 and 2006. The pricing of a large portion of our loan portfolio (approximately 45.4% of total loans at June 30, 2007 compared to 47.0% at June 30, 2006) is tied to our prime rate. Our weighted average prime rate for the first six months of 2007 was 8.25% compared to 7.66% in 2006.

We have been able to grow our funding base significantly. For asset/liability management purposes in 2007 and 2006, we elected to allocate a greater proportion of such funds to our loan portfolio versus our securities and shorter-term investment portfolio. For the first six months of 2007, average loan balances were 71.5% of total assets compared to 68.9% in 2006. Loans generally have higher yields than do securities and other shorter-term investments. This change in allocation contributed to the increase in the overall total interest earning asset yields between the two periods.

During 2007, overall deposit rates were higher than those rates for the comparable period in 2006. Changes in interest rates paid on such products as interest checking, savings and money market accounts, securities sold under agreements to repurchase and Federal funds purchased will generally increase or decrease in a manner that is consistent with changes in the short-term rate environment. During 2007, as was the case with our prime lending rate, short-term rates were higher than in 2006. We also monitor the pricing of similar products by our primary competitors. The changes in the short-term rate environment and the pricing of our primary competitors required us to increase these rates in 2007 compared to the previous periods which resulted in increased rates paid on interest bearing liabilities.

During 2007, the average balances of noninterest bearing deposit balances, interest bearing transaction accounts, savings and money market accounts and securities sold under agreements to repurchase amounted to 61.9% of our total funding compared to 54.9% in 2006. These funding sources generally have lower rates than do other funding sources, such as certificates of deposit and other borrowings and, as a result, these products served to offset some of the increase in funding costs in 2007.

Also impacting the net interest margin during 2007 compared to 2006 was pricing of our floating rate subordinated indebtedness which comprises approximately $31 million of the $52 million of subordinated indebtedness as of June 30, 2007. The interest rate charged on this indebtedness is generally higher than other funding sources. The rate charged on the floating rate portion of the indebtedness is determined in relation to the three-month LIBOR index and reprices quarterly. During 2007, the short-term interest rate environment was higher than previous years, and, as a result, the pricing for this funding source was higher in 2007.

There continues to be speculation in the marketplace as to the direction of interest rates and whether the Federal Reserve will increase or decrease the Federal funds target rate from the current 5.25%. As to intermediate and long-term rates, many economists are forecasting that these rates should increase over the next several quarters such that the “yield curve” approaches a more traditional position; however, these forecasts are always accompanied by many qualifiers. As a result, we continue to forecast in our modeling that interest rates will remain stable over the next few quarters.

The current shape of the yield curve represents a challenge for most banks, including Pinnacle National. However, we believe we will increase net interest income through growth in earning assets with continued emphasis on floating rate lending. The additional revenues provided by increased floating rate loans may not be sufficient to overcome any immediate increases in funding costs such that we are unable to maintain our current net interest margin. As a result, even though our net interest income will likely increase, our net interest margins could decrease due to new deposits being obtained at current market rates which are higher than our current average cost of funding and the continued competitive deposit pricing in our market area. We believe our net interest margin for the remainder of 2007 should be within a range of 3.45% to 3.65%, compared to 3.58% for the second quarter of 2007.

Page 31

Table of Contents

Provision for Loan Losses. The provision for loan losses represents a charge to earnings necessary to establish an allowance for loan losses that, in our management’s evaluation, should be adequate to provide coverage for the inherent losses on outstanding loans. The provision for loan losses amounted to $900,000 and $1,707,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively and $1,688,000 and $2,094,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively.

Based upon our management's evaluation of the loan portfolio, we believe the allowance for loan losses to be adequate to absorb our estimate of probable losses existing in the loan portfolio at June 30, 2007. During the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2007 and 2006, the provision for loan losses decreased by $807,000 and $406,000, respectively. These decreases were primarily attributable to the relatively low levels of nonperforming loans, past due loans, risk grades and net charge-off levels which resulted in reduced provisioning through our quarterly allowance for loan loss risk assessment. These decreases were offset by increased provisioning due to increases in charged off loans and loan volumes.

Based upon management's assessment of the loan portfolio, we adjust our allowance for loan losses to an amount deemed appropriate to adequately cover inherent risks in the loan portfolio. While our policies and procedures used to estimate the allowance for loan losses, as well as the resultant provision for loan losses charged to operations, are considered adequate by our management and are reviewed from time to time by our regulators, they are necessarily approximate and imprecise. There exist factors beyond our control, such as general economic conditions both locally and nationally, which may negatively impact, materially, the adequacy of our allowance for loan losses and, thus, the resulting provision for loan losses.

Noninterest Income. Our noninterest income is composed of several components, some of which vary significantly between quarterly periods. Service charges on deposit accounts and other noninterest income generally reflect our growth, while investment services and fees from the origination of mortgage loans will often reflect market conditions and fluctuate from period to period. The opportunities for recognition of gains on loans and loan participations sold and gains on sales of investment securities may also vary widely from quarter to quarter and year to year.

The following is the makeup of our noninterest income for the three and six months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006 (dollars in thousands):

	*Three months ended*				*2007-2006*			*Six months ended*				*2007-2006*
	*June 30,*				*Percent*			*June 30,*				*Percent*
	*2007*		*2006*		*Increase (decrease)*			*2007*		*2006*		*Increase (decrease)*
*Noninterest income:*
Service charges on deposit accounts	$	1,920	$	1,356		41.6	%	$	3,717	$	1,794		107.2	%
Investment sales commissions		850		653		30.2	%		1,585		1,166		35.9	%
Gains on sales of loans and loan participations, net:
Fees from the origination and sale of mortgage loans, net of sales commissions		472		422		11.8	%		790		673		17.4	%
Gains on loan participations sold, net		167		49		240.8	%		212		122		73.8	%
Insurance sales commissions		629		749		(16.0	%)		1,266		1,013		25.0	%
Gain on sale of investment securities, net		-		-		0.0	%		-		-		0.0	%
Trust fees		425		312		36.2	%		845		364		132.1	%
Other noninterest income:
Letters of credit fees		42		88		(52.3	%)		102		221		(53.8	%)
Bank-owned life insurance		133		119		11.8	%		271		155		74.8	%
ATM, check card and merchant card fees		672		466		44.2	%		1,309		500		161.8	%
Equity in earnings of Collateral Plus, LLC		78		22		254.5	%		89		59		50.8	%
Other noninterest income		163		144		13.2	%		392		361		8.6	%
Total noninterest income	$	5,551	$	4,380		26.7	%	$	10,578	$	6,428		64.6	%

Service charge income for 2007 increased over that of 2006 due to increased volumes from our Rutherford County market and an increase in the number of Nashville deposit accounts subject to service charges. We increased the number of customers utilizing overdraft protection and we increased our per item insufficient fund charge by approximately 13%, which also contributed to the increase in service charge revenue in 2007.

Page 32

Table of Contents

Also included in noninterest income are commissions and fees from our financial advisory unit, Pinnacle Asset Management, a division of Pinnacle National. At June 30, 2007, Pinnacle Asset Management was receiving commissions and fees in connection with approximately $643 million in brokerage assets held with Raymond James Financial Services, Inc. compared to $597 million at December 31, 2006. Additionally, following our merger with Cavalry, we now offer trust services through Pinnacle National’s trust division. At June 30, 2007, our trust department was receiving fees on approximately $436 million in assets compared to $395 million at December 31, 2006. Also, following our merger with Cavalry, we offer insurance services through Miller and Loughry Insurance and Services, Inc. which resulted in insurance sales commissions to Pinnacle National.

Additionally, mortgage related fees contributed to the increase in noninterest income between 2007 and 2006. These mortgage fees are for loans originated in both the Nashville and Rutherford County markets that are subsequently sold to third-party investors. All of these loan sales transfer servicing rights to the buyer. Generally, mortgage origination fees increase in lower interest rate environments and decrease in rising interest rate environments. As a result, mortgage origination fees may fluctuate greatly in response to a changing rate environment.

We also sell certain commercial loan participations to our correspondent banks. Such sales are primarily related to new lending transactions in excess of internal loan limits or industry concentration limits. At June 30, 2007 and pursuant to participation agreements with these correspondents, we had participated approximately $128.8 million of originated loans to these other banks compared to $95.4 million at December 31, 2006. These participation agreements have various provisions regarding collateral position, pricing and other matters. Many of these agreements provide that we pay the correspondent less than the loan’s contracted interest rate. Pursuant to SFAS No. 140, “Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets and Extinguishments of Liabilities — a replacement of FASB Statement No. 125,” in those transactions whereby the correspondent is receiving a lesser amount of interest than the amount owed by the customer, we record a net gain along with a corresponding asset representing the present value of our net retained cash flows. The resulting asset is amortized over the term of the loan. Conversely, should a loan be paid prior to maturity, any remaining unamortized asset is charged as a reduction to gains on loan participations sold. We recorded gains, net of amortization expense related to the aforementioned retained cash flow asset, of $167,000 and $49,000 during the three months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively, and $212,000 and $122,000 during the first six months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006 related to the loan participation transactions. We intend to maintain relationships with our correspondents in order to sell participations in future loans to these or other correspondents primarily due to limitations on loans to a single borrower or industry concentrations. In any event, the timing of participations may cause the level of gains, if any, to vary significantly.

Included in other noninterest income are miscellaneous consumer fees, such as ATM revenues, merchant card and other electronic banking revenues. We experienced a significant increase in these revenues in 2007 compared to 2006 due primarily to the merger with Cavalry.

Additionally, noninterest income from the cash surrender value of bank-owned life insurance increased significantly between 2007 and 2006. In connection with the Cavalry merger, we became the owner and beneficiary of several life insurance policies on former Cavalry executives. These policies were acquired by Cavalry in connection with a supplemental retirement plan for these former Cavalry executives.

Noninterest Expense. Noninterest expense consists of compensation and employee benefits, equipment and occupancy expenses, and other operating expenses. The following is the makeup of our noninterest expense for the three and six months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006 (dollars in thousands):

Page 33

Table of Contents

	*Three months ended*				*2007-2006*			*Six months ended*				*2007-2006*
	*June 30,*				*Percent*			*June 30,*				*Percent*
	*2007*		*2006*		*Increase (decrease)*			*2007*		*2006*		*Increase (decrease)*
*Noninterest expense:*
Compensation and employee benefits:
Salaries	$	5,758	$	4,798		20.0	%	$	11,173	$	7,788		43.5	%
Commissions		400		325		23.1	%		790		559		41.3	%
Other compensation, primarily incentives		1,121		1,100		1.9	%		2,236		1,720		30.0	%
Employee benefits and other		1,516		1,067		42.1	%		2,862		1,671		71.3	%
Total compensation and employee benefits		8,795		7,290		20.6	%		17,061		11,738		45.3	%
Equipment and occupancy		2,413		2,081		16.0	%		4,577		3,254		40.7	%
Marketing and business development		430		358		20.1	%		682		548		24.5	%
Postage and supplies		524		445		17.8	%		979		631		55.2	%
Amortization of core deposit intangible		516		516		-			1,032		647		59.5	%
Other noninterest expense:
Accounting and auditing		250		301		(16.9	%)		421		473		(11.0	%)
Consultants, including independent loan review		123		133		(7.5	%)		217		164		32.3	%
Legal, including borrower-related charges		90		85		5.9	%		223		122		82.8	%
OCC exam fees		104		58		79.3	%		151		114		32.5	%
Directors' fees		57		70		(18.6	%)		117		126		(7.1	%)
Insurance, including FDIC assessments		308		175		76.0	%		592		276		114.5	%
Charitable contributions		190		107		77.6	%		97		73		32.9	%
Other professional fees		78		37		110.8	%		45		36		25.0	%
Other noninterest expense		606		528		44.3	%		1414		867		63.1	%
Total other noninterest expense		1,806		1,494		20.9	%		3,277		2,251		45.6	%
Merger related expense		-		921		(100.0	%)		-		1,365		(100.0	%)
Total noninterest expense	$	14,484	$	13,105		10.5	%	$	27,608	$	20,434		35.1	%

Expenses have generally increased between the above periods due to our merger with Cavalry, personnel additions occurring throughout each period, the continued development of our branch network and other expenses which increase in relation to our growth rate. We anticipate continued increases in our expenses in the future for such items as additional personnel, the opening of additional branches, audit expenses and other expenses which tend to increase in relation to our growth. For the three months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006, approximately $456,000 and $250,000, respectively, and for the six months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006, approximately $923,000 and $532,000, respectively, of compensation expense related to stock options and restricted share awards is included in other incentive compensation expense.

At June 30, 2007, we employed 441.0 full time equivalent employees compared to 404.0 at December 31, 2006. We intend to continue to add employees in both the Nashville and Knoxville markets to our work force for the foreseeable future, which will cause our salary costs to increase in future periods.

We believe that variable pay incentives are a valuable tool in motivating an employee base that is focused on providing our clients effective financial advice and increasing shareholder value. As a result, and unlike many other financial institutions, substantially all of our employees are eligible to participate in an annual cash incentive plan. Under the plan, the targeted level of incentive payments requires the Company to achieve a certain targeted earnings per share. To the extent that actual earnings per share are above or below targeted earnings per share, the aggregate incentive payments are increased or decreased.

Included in the salary and employee benefits amounts for the three months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006, were $581,000 and $1,100,000, respectively, and for the six months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006, were $1,171,000 and $1,580,000, respectively, related to variable cash awards. This expense will fluctuate from year to year and quarter to quarter based on the estimation of achievement of performance targets and the increase in the number of associates eligible to receive the award. Based on our current earnings forecast for 2007, for the six months ended June 30, 2007, we have anticipated a cash award to qualifying associates equal to 40% of their targeted award and consequently we have recorded incentive expense of 40% of the targeted award for the first six months of 2007. We will continue to review our anticipated 2007 cash incentive expense throughout 2007 which may require us to increase or decrease the anticipated award above or below the 40% amount at June 30, 2007 based on the new estimate. For the six months ended June 30, 2006, the anticipated award to be paid to associates equaled 100% of their targeted award. The incentive plan for 2007 is structured similarly to prior year plans in that the award is based on the achievement of soundness and earnings objectives. Additionally, our Human Resources and Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors has the ability to change the parameters of the variable cash award at any time prior to final distribution of the awards in order to take into account current events and circumstances and maximize the benefit of the awards to our firm and to the associates.

Page 34

Table of Contents

Equipment and occupancy expenses in the second quarter of 2007 were greater than the second quarter of 2006 amount by 16% primarily due to increased operating costs and the opening of the Donelson branch in Nashville during the first quarter of 2007. Equipment and occupancy expenses in the first half of 2007 were greater than the same period in 2006 amount by 41% primarily due to the additional branches and equipment acquired with the Cavalry merger. These branch additions, and our planned expansion into the Knoxville market, will contribute toward an increase in our equipment and occupancy expenses throughout 2007 and future periods.

Marketing and other business development and postage and supplies expenses are higher in 2007 compared to 2006 due to increases in the number of customers and prospective customers; increases in the number of customer contact personnel and the corresponding increases in customer entertainment; and other business development expenses. The addition of customers from the Cavalry merger had a direct impact on these increased charges.

Included in noninterest expense for the second quarter of 2007 and 2006 is $516,000 and $516,000, respectively, and for the first six months of 2007 and 2006 is $1,032,000 and $647,000, respectively, of amortization of the core deposit intangible. This identified intangible is being amortized over seven years using an accelerated method which anticipates the life of the underlying deposits to which the intangible is attributable. Amortization expense associated with the core deposit intangible will approximate $1.8 million to $2.1 million per year for the next four years with lesser amounts for the remaining two years. Additionally, for the six months ended June 30, 2006, we incurred $1,365,000 of merger related expenses directly associated with the Cavalry merger. The merger related charges consisted of integration costs incurred in connection with the merger, including accelerated depreciation associated with software and other technology assets whose useful lives were shortened as a result of the Cavalry acquisition. We do not anticipate any additional merger related expenses associated with the Cavalry transaction in 2007.

Other noninterest expenses increased 20.9% in the second quarter of 2007 when compared to 2006 and 45.6% in the first half of 2007 over 2006. Most of these increases are attributable to increased contributions, professional fees and expenses associated with our wholly-owned subsidiary PNFP Insurance, which was formed in late 2006.

Our efficiency ratio (ratio of noninterest expense to the sum of net interest income and noninterest income) was 62.4% for the second quarter of 2007 compared to 61.6% in the second quarter 2006 and 60.9% for the first six months of 2007 compared to 62.2% in 2006. The efficiency ratio measures the amount of expense that is incurred to generate a dollar of revenue.

Financial Condition

Total assets grew to $2.315 billion at June 30, 2007 from $2.142 billion at December 31, 2006 based entirely on organic growth.

Loans. The composition of loans at June 30, 2007 and at December 31, 2006 and the percentage (%) of each classification to total loans are summarized as follows (dollars in thousands):

	*June 30, 2007*					*December 31, 2006*
	*Amount*		*Percent*			*Amount*		*Percent*
Commercial real estate - Mortgage	$	307,757		18.5	%	$	284,302		19.0	%
Commercial real estate - Construction		177,426		10.7	%		161,903		10.8	%
Commercial - Other		738,866		44.4	%		608,530		40.6	%
Total commercial		1,224,049		73.6	%		1,054,735		70.4	%
Consumer real estate - Mortgage		288,325		17.3	%		299,627		20.0	%
Consumer real estate - Construction		102,998		6.2	%		91,194		6.1	%
Consumer – Other		47,658		2.9	%		52,179		3.5	%
Total consumer		438,981		26.4	%		443,000		29.6	%
Total loans	$	1,663,030		100.0	%	$	1,497,735		100.0	%

During the six months ended June 30, 2007, our loan balances increased by $165.3 million, or 22% on an annualized basis. As noted above, we have increased the percentage commercial loans to total loans during the six months ended June 30, 2007. Most of this increase was in our commercial-other portfolio (i.e., commercial and industrial loans). Although the percentage of commercial real estate loans in relation to total loans has decreased slightly, we have increased the balances of our commercial real estate loans with much of this increase attributable to owner-occupied mortgage loans, build-to-suit commercial loans and owner-occupied construction project loans. The increase in owner-occupied lending has been offset by decreases in loans to real estate developers, primarily due to the broader economy and developers avoiding increases in inventories. Additionally, during the six months ended June 30, 2007, the percentage of consumer mortgage loan portfolio to total loans decreased by 2.7%. Although the consumer real estate market in the Nashville MSA is exceptionally strong, we believe this decrease is due to the impact of higher consumer mortgage rates and a general reduction in consumer real estate activity in 2007 when compared to last year.

Page 35

Table of Contents

We periodically analyze our commercial loan portfolio to determine if a concentration of credit risk exists to any one or more industries. We use broadly accepted industry classification systems in order to classify borrowers into various industry classifications. As a result, we have a credit exposure (loans outstanding plus unfunded commitments) exceeding 25% of Pinnacle National’s total risk-based capital to borrowers in the following industries at June 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006 (dollars in thousands):

			At June 30, 2007
	Outstanding Principal Balances		Unfunded Commitments		Total exposure		Total Exposure at December 31, 2006
Trucking industry	$	65,459	$	28,984	$	99,443	$	89,862
Lessors of nonresidential buildings		144,663		17,718		162,381		133,504
Lessors of residential buildings		63,594		7,012		70,606		65,791
Land subdividers		126,711		53,989		180,700		164,535
New housing operative builders		131,572		81,263		212,835		192,373

The following table classifies our fixed and variable rate loans at June 30, 2007 according to contractual maturities of (1) one year or less, (2) after one year through five years, and (3) after five years. The table also classifies our variable rate loans pursuant to the contractual repricing dates of the underlying loans (dollars in thousands):

	*Amounts at June 30, 2007*
	*Fixed*		*Variable*				*At June 30,*			*At December 31,*
	*Rates*		*Rates*		*Totals*		*2007*			*2006*
Based on contractual maturity:
Due within one year	$	89,645	$	615,739	$	705,384		42.4	%		40.9	%
Due in one year to five years		480,883		183,489		664,372		40.0	%		39.9	%
Due after five years		79,814		213,460		293,274		17.6	%		19.2	%
Totals	$	650,342	$	1,012,688	$	1,663,030		100.0	%		100.0	%

Based on contractual repricing dates:
Daily floating rate	$	-	$	755,310	$	755,310		45.4	%		46.1	%
Due within one year		89,645		183,013		272,658		16.4	%		13.6	%
Due in one year to five years		480,883		63,474		544,357		32.7	%		34.2	%
Due after five years		79,814		10,891		90,705		5.5	%		6.1	%
Totals	$	650,342	$	1,012,688	$	1,663,030		100.0	%		100.0	%

____________________

The above information does not consider the impact of scheduled principal payments. Daily floating rate loans are tied to Pinnacle National’s prime lending rate or a national interest rate index with the underlying loan rates changing in relation to changes in these indexes.

Non-Performing Assets. The specific economic and credit risks associated with our loan portfolio include, but are not limited to, a general downturn in the economy which could affect employment rates in our market area, general real estate market deterioration, interest rate fluctuations, deteriorated or non-existent collateral, title defects, inaccurate appraisals, financial deterioration of borrowers, fraud, and any violation of laws and regulations.

We attempt to reduce these economic and credit risks by adherence to loan to value guidelines for collateralized loans, by investigating the creditworthiness of the borrower and by monitoring the borrower's financial position. Also, we establish and periodically review our lending policies and procedures. Banking regulations limit our exposure by prohibiting loan relationships that exceed 15% of Pinnacle National’s statutory capital in the case of loans that are not fully secured by readily marketable or other permissible types of collateral. Furthermore, we have an internal limit for aggregate indebtedness to a single borrower of $15 million. Our loan policy requires that our board of directors approve any relationships that exceed this internal limit.

Page 36

Table of Contents

We discontinue the accrual of interest income when (1) there is a significant deterioration in the financial condition of the borrower and full repayment of principal and interest is not expected or (2) the principal or interest is more than 90 days past due, unless the loan is both well-secured and in the process of collection. At June 30, 2007, we had $2,392,000 in loans on nonaccrual compared to $7,070,000 at December 31, 2006. The decrease in nonperforming loans between June 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006 was primarily related to borrower payments received during the six months ended June 30, 2007.

At June 30, 2007, we owned $687,000 in real estate which we had acquired, usually through foreclosure, from borrowers compared to $995,000 at December 31, 2006. Substantially all of these amounts relate to homes that are in various stages of construction for which we believe we have adequate collateral.

There were $606,000 of other loans 90 past due and still accruing interest at June 30, 2007 compared to $737,000 at December 31, 2006. At June 30, 2007 and at December 31, 2006, no loans were deemed to be restructured loans. The following table is a summary of our nonperforming assets at June 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006 (dollars in thousands):

	*At June 30,*			*At Dec. 31,*
	*2007*			*2006*
Nonaccrual loans (1)	$	2,392		$	7,070
Restructured loans		-			-
Other real estate owned		687			995
Total nonperforming assets		3,079			8,065
Accruing loans past due 90 days or more		606			737
Total nonperforming assets and accruing loans past due 90 days or more	$	3,685		$	8,802
Total loans outstanding	$	1,663,030		$	1,497,735
Ratio of nonperforming assets and accruing loans past due 90 days or more to total loans outstanding at end of period		0.22	%		0.59	%
Ratio of nonperforming assets and accruing loans past 90 days or more to total allowance for loan losses at end of period		21.21	%		54.61	%

________________________

(1)	Interest income that would have been recorded during the six months ended June 30, 2007 related to nonaccrual loans was $230,000.

Potential problem assets, which are not included in nonperforming assets, amounted to approximately $2.1 million or 0.16% of total loans outstanding at June 30, 2007, compared to $6.0 million, or 0.24% of total loans outstanding at December 31, 2006. Potential problem assets represent those assets with a potential weakness or a well-defined weakness and where information about possible credit problems of borrowers has caused management to have serious doubts about the borrower’s ability to comply with present repayment terms. This definition is believed to be substantially consistent with the standards established by the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC), Pinnacle National’s primary regulator for loans classified as substandard.

We believe that over an extended period of time our credit statistics will outperform our peers due to our hiring philosophy of recruiting only experienced lenders and their focused marketing to high quality borrowers in middle Tennessee and Knoxville.

Allowance for Loan Losses (allowance). We maintain the allowance at a level that our management deems appropriate to adequately cover the inherent risks in the loan portfolio. As of June 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006, our allowance for loan losses was $17,375,000 and $16,118,000, respectively, which our management deemed to be adequate at each of the respective dates. The increase in our allowance was primarily the result of increases in loan balances and net charge-offs for the six months ended June 30, 2007. The judgments and estimates associated with our allowance determination are described under “Critical Accounting Estimates” above.

Page 37

Table of Contents

Approximately 73.6% of our loan portfolio at June 30, 2007 consisted of commercial loans compared to 70.4% at December 31, 2006. The following table sets forth, based on management's best estimate, the allocation of the allowance to types of loans as well as the unallocated portion as of June 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006 and the percentage of loans in each category to the total loans (dollars in thousands):

	*June 30, 2007*					*December 31, 2006*
	*Amount*		*Percent*			*Amount*		*Percent*
Commercial real estate - Mortgage	$	4,913		18.5	%	$	4,550		19.0	%
Commercial real estate - Construction		2,833		10.7	%		2,591		10.8	%
Commercial - Other		7,436		44.4	%		6,517		40.6	%
Total commercial		15,182		73.6	%		13,658		70.4	%
Consumer real estate - Mortgage		768		17.3	%		913		20.0	%
Consumer real estate - Construction		274		6.2	%		278		6.1	%
Consumer - Other		803		2.9	%		870		3.5	%
Total consumer		1,845		26.4	%		2,061		29.6	%
Unallocated		348	NA				399	NA
Total allowance for loan losses	$	17,375		100.0	%	$	16,118		100.0	%

The following is a summary of changes in the allowance for loan losses for the six months ended June 30, 2007 and for the year ended December 31, 2006 and the ratio of the allowance for loan losses to total loans as of the end of each period (dollars in thousands):

	*June 30,* *2007*			*Dec. 31,* *2006*
Balance at beginning of period	$	16,118		$	7,858
Provision for loan losses		1,688			3,732
Allowance acquired in Cavalry acquisition		-			5,102
Charged-off loans:
Commercial real estate – Mortgage		-			-
Commercial real estate - Construction		-			-
Commercial – Other		(118	)		(436	)
Consumer real estate – Mortgage		(298	)		(46	)
Consumer real estate - Construction		-			-
Consumer – Other		(136	)		(336	)
Total charged-off loans		(552	)		(818	)
Recoveries of previously charged-off loans:
Commercial real estate - Mortgage		-			-
Commercial real estate - Construction		-			-
Commercial - Other		37			166
Consumer real estate - Mortgage		61			-
Consumer real estate - Construction		-			-
Consumer - Other		23			78
Total recoveries of previously charged-off loans		121			244
Net (charge-offs) recoveries		(431	)		(574	)
Balance at end of period	$	17,375		$	16,118

Ratio of allowance for loan losses to total loans outstanding at end of period		1.04	%		1.08	%
Ratio of net charge-offs (*) to average loans outstanding for the period		0.06	%		0.05	%

________________________

(*) Net charge-offs for the six months ended June 30, 2007 have been annualized.

As noted in our critical accounting policies, management assesses the adequacy of the allowance prior to the end of each calendar quarter. This assessment includes procedures to estimate the allowance and test the adequacy and appropriateness of the resulting balance. The level of the allowance is based upon management’s evaluation of the loan portfolios, past loan loss experience, known and inherent risks in the portfolio, adverse situations that may affect the borrower’s ability to repay (including the timing of future payment), the estimated value of any underlying collateral, composition of the loan portfolio, economic conditions, industry and peer bank loan quality indications and other pertinent factors. This evaluation is inherently subjective as it requires material estimates including the amounts and timing of future cash flows expected to be received on impaired loans that may be susceptible to significant change. Although the allowance increased by $1.26 million between June 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006, the ratio of our allowance for loan losses to total loans outstanding decreased to 1.04% at June 30, 2007 compared to 1.08% at December 31, 2006. The reduction in the ratio between the two dates is primarily attributable to improvements in many of our credit quality measurements, including our level of nonperforming loans, past due loans, potential problem loans and other matters. In the future, the allowance to total loans outstanding ratio will increase or decrease to the extent the factors that influence our quarterly allowance assessment in their entirety either improve or weaken.

Page 38

Table of Contents

Investments. Our investment portfolio, consisting primarily of Federal agency bonds, state and municipal securities and mortgage-backed securities, amounted to $340 million and $346 million at June 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006, respectively. Our investment portfolio serves many purposes including serving as a stable source of income, collateral for public funds and as a liquidity source. A statistical comparison of our entire investment portfolio at June 30, 2007 and at December 31, 2006 is as follows:

	June 30, 2007	December 31, 2006
Weighted average life	4.81 years	4.93 years
Weighted average coupon	5.04%	4.85%
Tax equivalent yield	4.91%	5.01%

Deposits and Other Borrowings. We had approximately $1.798 billion of deposits at June 30, 2007 compared to $1.622 billion at December 31, 2006. Our deposits consist of noninterest and interest-bearing demand accounts, savings accounts, money market accounts and time deposits. Additionally, we entered into agreements with certain customers to sell certain of our securities under agreements to repurchase the security the following day. These agreements (which are typically associated with comprehensive treasury management programs for our clients and provide them with short-term returns for their excess funds) amounted to $140.0 million at June 30, 2007 and $141.0 million at December 31, 2006. Additionally, at June 30, 2007, we had borrowed $26.7 million in advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank of Cincinnati compared to $53.7 million at December 31, 2006.

Generally, banks classify their funding base as either core funding or non-core funding. Core funding consists of all deposits other than time deposits issued in denominations of $100,000 or greater. All other funding is deemed to be non-core. The following table represents the balances of our deposits and other fundings and the percentage of each type to the total at June 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006 (dollars in thousands):

	*June 30,*					*December 31,*
	*2007*		*Percent*			*2006*		*Percent*
*Core funding:*
Noninterest-bearing deposit accounts	$	294,631		14.5	%	$	300,978		16.1	%
Interest-bearing demand accounts		284,080		14.0	%		236,674		12.7	%
Savings and money market accounts		530,081		26.0	%		485,936		26.0	%
Time deposit accounts less than $100,000		159,741		7.8	%		158,687		8.5	%
Total core funding		1,268,533		62.3	%		1,182,275		63.3	%
*Non-core funding:*
Time deposit accounts greater than $100,000
Public funds		95,827		4.7	%		98,286		5.3	%
Brokered deposits		146,802		7.2	%		61,718		3.3	%
Other time deposits		286,373		14.1	%		280,132		15.0	%
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase		140,443		6.9	%		141,016		7.5	%
Federal Home Loan Bank advances and Federal funds purchased		46,699		2.3	%		53,726		2.9	%
Subordinated debt		51,548		2.5	%		51,548		2.8	%
Total non-core funding		767,692		37.7	%		686,426		36.7	%
Totals	$	2,036,225		100.0	%	$	1,868,701		100.0	%

Subordinated debt. On December 29, 2003, we established PNFP Statutory Trust I; on September 15, 2005 we established PNFP Statutory Trust II; and on September 7, 2006 we established PNFP Statutory Trust III (“Trust I”; “Trust II”; “Trust III” or collectively, the “Trusts”). All are wholly-owned statutory business trusts. We are the sole sponsor of the Trusts and acquired each Trust’s common securities for $310,000; $619,000 and $619,000, respectively. The Trusts were created for the exclusive purpose of issuing 30-year capital trust preferred securities (“Trust Preferred Securities”) in the aggregate amount of $10,000,000 for Trust I; $20,000,000 for Trust II and $20,000,000 for Trust III and using the proceeds to acquire junior subordinated debentures (“Subordinated Debentures”) issued by Pinnacle Financial. The sole assets of the Trusts are the Subordinated Debentures. Our $1,548,000 investment in the Trusts is included in investments in unconsolidated subsidiaries in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets and our $51,548,000 obligation is reflected as subordinated debt.

Page 39

Table of Contents

The Trust I Preferred Securities bear a floating interest rate based on a spread over 3-month LIBOR (8.16% at June 30, 2007) which is set each quarter and matures on December 30, 2033. The Trust II Preferred Securities bear a fixed interest rate of 5.848% per annum thru September 30, 2010 after which time the securities will bear a floating rate set each quarter based on a spread over 3-month LIBOR. The Trust II securities mature on September 30, 2035. The Trust III Preferred Securities bear a floating interest rate based on a spread over 3-month LIBOR (7.00% at June 30, 2007) which is set each quarter and mature on September 30, 2036.

Distributions are payable quarterly. The Trust Preferred Securities are subject to mandatory redemption upon repayment of the Subordinated Debentures at their stated maturity date or their earlier redemption in an amount equal to their liquidation amount plus accumulated and unpaid distributions to the date of redemption. We guarantee the payment of distributions and payments for redemption or liquidation of the Trust Preferred Securities to the extent of funds held by the Trusts. Pinnacle Financial’s obligations under the Subordinated Debentures together with the guarantee and other back-up obligations, in the aggregate, constitute a full and unconditional guarantee by Pinnacle Financial of the obligations of the Trusts under the Trust Preferred Securities.

The Subordinated Debentures are unsecured; bear interest at a rate equal to the rates paid by the Trusts on the Trust Preferred Securities and mature on the same dates as those noted above for the Trust Preferred Securities. Interest is payable quarterly. We may defer the payment of interest at any time for a period not exceeding 20 consecutive quarters provided that the deferral period does not extend past the stated maturity. During any such deferral period, distributions on the Trust Preferred Securities will also be deferred and our ability to pay dividends on our common shares will be restricted.

Subject to approval by the Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta, the Trust Preferred Securities may be redeemed prior to maturity at our option on or after September 17, 2008 for Trust I; on or after September 30, 2010 for Trust II and September 30, 2011 for Trust III. The Trust Preferred Securities may also be redeemed at any time in whole (but not in part) in the event of unfavorable changes in laws or regulations that result in (1) the Trust becoming subject to Federal income tax on income received on the Subordinated Debentures, (2) interest payable by the parent company on the Subordinated Debentures becoming non-deductible for Federal tax purposes, (3) the requirement for the Trust to register under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended, or (4) loss of the ability to treat the Trust Preferred Securities as “Tier I capital” under the Federal Reserve capital adequacy guidelines.

The Trust Preferred Securities for the Trusts qualify as Tier I capital under current regulatory definitions subject to certain limitations.

Capital Resources. At June 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006, our stockholders’ equity amounted to $265.2 million and $256.0 million, respectively, or an increase of $9.2 million. This increase was primarily attributable to $7.7 million in comprehensive income, which was composed of $11.0 million in net income together with $3.3 million of net unrealized holding losses associated with our available-for-sale portfolio.

Dividends. Pinnacle National is subject to restrictions on the payment of dividends to Pinnacle Financial under Federal banking laws and the regulations of the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency. We, in turn, are also subject to limits on payment of dividends to our shareholders by the rules, regulations and policies of Federal banking authorities and the laws of the State of Tennessee. We have not paid any dividends to date, nor do we anticipate paying dividends to our shareholders for the foreseeable future. Future dividend policy will depend on Pinnacle National's earnings, capital position, financial condition and other factors.

Market and Liquidity Risk Management

Our objective is to manage assets and liabilities to provide a satisfactory, consistent level of profitability within the framework of established liquidity, loan, investment, borrowing, and capital policies. Our Asset Liability Management Committee (“ALCO”) is charged with the responsibility of monitoring these policies, which are designed to ensure acceptable composition of asset/liability mix. Two critical areas of focus for ALCO are interest rate sensitivity and liquidity risk management.

Interest Rate Sensitivity. In the normal course of business, we are exposed to market risk arising from fluctuations in interest rates. ALCO measures and evaluates the interest rate risk so that we can meet customer demands for various types of loans and deposits. ALCO determines the most appropriate amounts of on-balance sheet and off-balance sheet items. Measurements which we use to help us manage interest rate sensitivity include an earnings simulation model and an economic value of equity model. These measurements are used in conjunction with competitive pricing analysis.

Page 40

Table of Contents

Earnings simulation model. We believe that interest rate risk is best measured by our earnings simulation modeling. Forecasted levels of earning assets, interest-bearing liabilities, and off-balance sheet financial instruments are combined with ALCO forecasts of interest rates for the next 12 months and are combined with other factors in order to produce various earnings simulations. To limit interest rate risk, we have guidelines for our earnings at risk which seek to limit the variance of net interest income to less than a 20 percent decline for a 300 basis point change up or down in rates from management’s flat interest rate forecast over the next twelve months; to less than a 10 percent decline for a 200 basis point change up or down in rates from management’s flat interest rate forecast over the next twelve months; and to less than a 5 percent decline for a 100 basis point change up or down in rates from management’s flat interest rate forecast over the next twelve months. The results of our current simulation model would indicate that we are in compliance with our current guidelines at June 30, 2007.

Economic value of equity. Our economic value of equity model measures the extent that estimated economic values of our assets, liabilities and off-balance sheet items will change as a result of interest rate changes. Economic values are determined by discounting expected cash flows from assets, liabilities and off-balance sheet items, which establishes a base case economic value of equity. To help limit interest rate risk, we have a guideline stating that for an instantaneous 300 basis point change in interest rates up or down, the economic value of equity should not decrease by more than 30 percent from the base case; for a 200 basis point instantaneous change in interest rates up or down, the economic value of equity should not decrease by more than 20 percent; and for a 100 basis point instantaneous change in interest rates up or down, the economic value of equity should not decrease by more than 10 percent. The results of our current economic value of equity model would indicate that we are in compliance with our current guidelines at June 30, 2007.

Each of the above analyses may not, on its own, be an accurate indicator of how our net interest income will be affected by changes in interest rates. Income associated with interest-earning assets and costs associated with interest-bearing liabilities may not be affected uniformly by changes in interest rates. In addition, the magnitude and duration of changes in interest rates may have a significant impact on net interest income. For example, although certain assets and liabilities may have similar maturities or periods of repricing, they may react in different degrees to changes in market interest rates. Interest rates on certain types of assets and liabilities fluctuate in advance of changes in general market rates, while interest rates on other types may lag behind changes in general market rates. In addition, certain assets, such as adjustable rate mortgage loans, have features (generally referred to as "interest rate caps and floors") which limit changes in interest rates. Prepayment and early withdrawal levels also could deviate significantly from those assumed in calculating the maturity of certain instruments. The ability of many borrowers to service their debts also may decrease during periods of rising interest rates. ALCO reviews each of the above interest rate sensitivity analyses along with several different interest rate scenarios as part of its responsibility to provide a satisfactory, consistent level of profitability within the framework of established liquidity, loan, investment, borrowing, and capital policies.

We may also use derivative financial instruments to improve the balance between interest-sensitive assets and interest-sensitive liabilities and as one tool to manage our interest rate sensitivity while continuing to meet the credit and deposit needs of our customers. At June 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006, we had not entered into any derivative contracts to assist managing our interest rate sensitivity.

Liquidity Risk Management. The purpose of liquidity risk management is to ensure that there are sufficient cash flows to satisfy loan demand, deposit withdrawals, and our other needs. Traditional sources of liquidity for a bank include asset maturities and growth in core deposits. A bank may achieve its desired liquidity objectives from the management of its assets and liabilities and by internally generated funding through its operations. Funds invested in marketable instruments that can be readily sold and the continuous maturing of other earning assets are sources of liquidity from an asset perspective. The liability base provides sources of liquidity through attraction of increased deposits and borrowing funds from various other institutions.

Changes in interest rates also affect our liquidity position. We currently price deposits in response to market rates and our management intends to continue this policy. If deposits are not priced in response to market rates, a loss of deposits could occur which would negatively affect our liquidity position.

Scheduled loan payments are a relatively stable source of funds, but loan payoffs and deposit flows fluctuate significantly, being influenced by interest rates, general economic conditions and competition. Additionally, debt security investments are subject to prepayment and call provisions that could accelerate their payoff prior to stated maturity. We attempt to price our deposit products to meet our asset/liability objectives consistent with local market conditions. Our ALCO is responsible for monitoring our ongoing liquidity needs. Our regulators also monitor our liquidity and capital resources on a periodic basis.

In addition, Pinnacle National is a member of the Federal Home Loan Bank of Cincinnati. As a result, Pinnacle National receives advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank of Cincinnati, pursuant to the terms of various borrowing agreements, which assist it in the funding of its home mortgage and commercial real estate loan portfolios. Pinnacle National has pledged under the borrowing agreements with the Federal Home Loan Bank of Cincinnati certain qualifying residential mortgage loans and, pursuant to a blanket lien, all qualifying commercial mortgage loans as collateral. At June 30, 2007, Pinnacle National had received advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank of Cincinnati totaling $26.7 million at the following rates and maturities (dollars in thousands):

Page 41

Table of Contents

	Amount	Interest Rates
2007	$ 1,000	4.0%
2008	10,000	5.0%
2009	15,000	5.0%
Thereafter	699	2.3%
Total	$ 26,699
Weighted average interest rate		4.9%

At June 30, 2007, brokered certificates of deposit approximated $146.8 million which represented 7.2% of total fundings compared to $61.7 million and 3.3% at December 31, 2006. We issue these brokered certificates through several different brokerage houses based on competitive bid. Typically, these funds are for varying maturities from six months to two years and are issued at rates which are competitive to rates we would be required to pay to attract similar deposits from the local market as well as rates for Federal Home Loan Bank of Cincinnati advances of similar maturities. We consider these deposits to be a ready source of liquidity under current market conditions.

At June 30, 2007, we had no significant commitments for capital expenditures. However, we are in the process of developing our branch network or other office facilities in the Nashville MSA and the Knoxville MSA. As a result, we anticipate that we will enter into contracts to buy property or construct branch facilities and/or lease agreements to lease facilities in the Nashville MSA and Knoxville MSA.

Our management believes that we have adequate liquidity to meet all known contractual obligations and unfunded commitments, including loan commitments and reasonable borrower, depositor, and creditor requirements over the next twelve months.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements. At June 30, 2007, we had outstanding standby letters of credit of $63.0 million and unfunded loan commitments outstanding of $543.0 million. Because these commitments generally have fixed expiration dates and many will expire without being drawn upon, the total commitment level does not necessarily represent future cash requirements. If needed to fund these outstanding commitments, Pinnacle National has the ability to liquidate Federal funds sold or securities available-for-sale, or on a short-term basis to borrow and purchase Federal funds from other financial institutions.

At June 30, 2007, Pinnacle National had accommodations with upstream correspondent banks for unsecured short-term advances. These accommodations have various covenants related to their term and availability, and in most cases must be repaid within less than a month.

Impact of Inflation

The consolidated financial statements and related consolidated financial data presented herein have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States and practices within the banking industry which require the measurement of financial position and operating results in terms of historical dollars without considering the changes in the relative purchasing power of money over time due to inflation. Unlike most industrial companies, virtually all the assets and liabilities of a financial institution are monetary in nature. As a result, interest rates have a more significant impact on a financial institution's performance than the effects of general levels of inflation.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements” – SFAS No. 157 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in generally accepted accounting principles and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. SFAS No. 157 applies only to fair-value measurements that are already required or permitted by other accounting standards and is expected to increase the consistency of those measurements. The definition of fair value focuses on the exit price, i.e., the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date, not the entry price, i.e., the price that would be paid to acquire the asset or received to assume the liability at the measurement date. The statement emphasizes that fair value is a market-based measurement; not an entity-specific measurement. Therefore, the fair value measurement should be determined based on the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability. The effective date for SFAS No. 157 is for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007, and interim periods within those fiscal years. We are currently evaluating the impact of SFAS No. 157 on its consolidated financial statements.

In February of 2007, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standard No. 159 (“SFAS 159”), The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities, which gives entities the option to measure eligible financial assets, and financial liabilities at fair value on an instrument by instrument basis, that are otherwise not permitted to be accounted for at fair value under other accounting standards. The election to use the fair value option is available when an entity first recognizes a financial asset or financial liability. Subsequent changes in fair value must be recorded in earnings. This statement is effective as of the beginning of a company’s first fiscal year after November 15, 2007. We are in the process of analyzing the impact of SFAS 159.

Page 42

Table of Contents

ITEM 3.

QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

The information required by this Item 3 is included on pages 35 through 40 of Part I - Item 2 - “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.”

ITEM 4.

CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

Pinnacle Financial maintains disclosure controls and procedures, as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”), that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by it in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms and that such information is accumulated and communicated to Pinnacle Financial’s management, including its Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. Pinnacle Financial carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of its management, including its Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of its disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on the evaluation of these disclosure controls and procedures, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that Pinnacle Financial’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective.

Changes in Internal Controls

There were no changes in Pinnacle Financial’s internal control over financial reporting during Pinnacle Financial’s fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2007 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, Pinnacle Financial’s internal control over financial reporting.

Page 43

Table of Contents

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1.

LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

There are no material pending legal proceedings to which the Company is a party or of which any of their property is the subject.

ITEM 1A.

RISK FACTORS

Except as disclosed in our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2007, there have been no material changes to our risk factors as previously disclosed in Part I, Item IA of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006.

ITEM 2.

UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS

(a) Not applicable

(b) Not applicable

ITEM 3.

DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES

Not applicable

ITEM 4.

SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS

(a)

Our annual meeting of the shareholders was held on April 17, 2007. There were 12,795,756 shares of common stock represented at the meeting either in person or by proxy.

(b)

The following directors were elected at the meeting to serve until the annual meeting of shareholders in the year 2010 (Class I):

	Votes	Votes	Broker
	For	Withheld	Non-votes
Sue G. Atkinson	12,609,746	186,010	-
Colleen Conway-Welch	12,079,773	715,983	-
Gregory L. Burns	12,613,806	181,950	-
Clay T. Jackson	12,066,932	728,824	-

(c)

Other matters voted upon and the results of the voting were as follows:

At the annual meeting of shareholders, the shareholders also ratified the appointment of KPMG LLP as Pinnacle Financial’s independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2007. The shareholders voted 12,675,448 in the affirmative and 105,446 against the proposal with 14,862 abstentions.

ITEM 5.

OTHER INFORMATION

None

Page 44

Table of Contents

ITEM 6.

EXHIBITS

31.1

Certification pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a)

31.2

Certification pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a)

32.1

Certification pursuant to 18 USC Section 1350 – Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

32.2

Certification pursuant to 18 USC Section 1350 – Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Pinnacle Financial is a party to certain agreements entered into in connection with the offering by PNFP Statutory Trust I, PNFP Statutory Trust II and PNFP Statutory Trust III of an aggregate of $50,000,000 in trust preferred securities, as more fully described in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. In accordance with Item 601(b)(4)(ii) of Regulation SB, and because the total amount of the trust preferred securities is not in excess of 10% of Pinnacle Financial’s total assets, Pinnacle Financial has not filed the various documents and agreements associated with the trust preferred securities herewith. Pinnacle Financial has, however, agreed to furnish copies of the various documents and agreements associated with the trust preferred securities to the Securities and Exchange Commission upon request.

Page 45

Table of Contents

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

	PINNACLE FINANCIAL PARTNERS, INC.


	/s/ M. Terry Turner
	M. Terry Turner
August 1, 2007	President and Chief Executive Officer


	/s/ Harold R. Carpenter
	Harold R. Carpenter
August 1, 2007	Chief Financial Officer

Page 46