Table of Contents

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, DC  20549

FORM 10-Q

x                              Quarterly report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2008 or

o                                 Transition report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

For the transition period from                        to                       

Commission file number 1-9356

BUCKEYE PARTNERS, L.P.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code:    610-904-4000

Not Applicable

(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report).

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

Yes x  No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” and “small reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).  Yes o   No x

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.

Table of Contents

BUCKEYE PARTNERS, L.P.

INDEX

Table of Contents

PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

Buckeye Partners, L.P.

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income

(In thousands, except per unit amounts)

(Unaudited)

See Notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

3

Table of Contents

Buckeye Partners, L.P.

Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets

(In thousands)

(Unaudited)

See Notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

4

Table of Contents

Buckeye Partners, L.P.

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

(In thousands)

(Unaudited)

See Notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

5

Table of Contents

Buckeye Partners, L.P.

Condensed Consolidated Statement of Partners’ Capital

(In thousands)

(Unaudited)

See Notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

6

Table of Contents

BUCKEYE PARTNERS, L.P.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(UNAUDITED)

1.  BASIS OF PRESENTATION

Buckeye Partners, L.P. (“Buckeye”) is a publicly traded (NYSE: BPL) master limited partnership organized in 1986 under the laws of the state of Delaware.  Buckeye GP LLC (“Buckeye GP”) is the general partner of Buckeye.  Buckeye GP is a wholly owned subsidiary of Buckeye GP Holdings L.P. (“BGH”), a Delaware limited partnership that is also publicly traded (NYSE: BGH).

Buckeye, through its subsidiaries, owns and operates one of the largest independent refined petroleum products pipeline systems in the United States in terms of volumes delivered, with approximately 5,400 miles of pipeline serving 17 states, and operates an approximate 2,200 miles of pipeline under agreements with major oil and chemical companies. Buckeye also owns 63 refined petroleum products terminals with aggregate storage capacity of approximately 22.9 million barrels in 13 states.

On January 18, 2008, Buckeye acquired Lodi Gas Storage, L.L.C. (“Lodi Gas”).  Lodi Gas owns and operates two natural gas storage facilities near Lodi, California.  Together, these facilities provide approximately 22 billion cubic feet (“bcf”) of gas capacity and are connected to Pacific Gas and Electric’s intrastate gas pipelines that service natural gas demand in the San Francisco and Sacramento areas (see Note 3 for a further discussion).

On February 8, 2008, Buckeye acquired Farm & Home Oil Company LLC (“Farm & Home”).  Farm & Home sells refined petroleum products on a wholesale basis, principally in eastern and central Pennsylvania.  When Farm & Home was acquired, it also had retail operations, but Buckeye sold those operations to a wholly owned subsidiary of Inergy, L.P. on April 15, 2008.  The assets and liabilities and results of operations of Farm & Home’s retail operations were determined to be discontinued operations effective on the Farm & Home acquisition date of February 8, 2008 (see Note 3 for a further discussion).

With the acquisitions of Lodi Gas and Farm & Home, Buckeye determined that it had two additional reportable segments: Natural Gas Storage and Energy Services.  Effective in the first quarter of 2008, Buckeye conducts business in five reportable operating segments: Pipeline Operations; Terminalling and Storage; Natural Gas Storage; Energy Services; and Other Operations.  See Note 15 for a more detailed discussion of Buckeye’s operating segments.

Buckeye Pipe Line Services Company (“Services Company”) employs approximately 900 employees who provide services to the operating subsidiaries through which Buckeye conducts its operations.  These employees represent the majority of the employees who work for Buckeye.  Approximately 100 employees are employed directly by Lodi Gas and Farm & Home.  Under a services agreement entered into in December 2004 (the “Services Agreement”), the operating subsidiaries directly reimburse Services Company for the cost of the services provided by the employees employed by Services Company.  Under the Services Agreement and an Executive Employment Agreement, certain executive compensation costs and related benefits for Buckeye GP’s four highest paid officers are not reimbursed by Buckeye or its subsidiaries, but are reimbursed to Services Company by BGH.  At June 30, 2008, Services Company owned an approximate 4.5% limited partner interest in Buckeye.

In the opinion of management, the condensed consolidated financial statements of Buckeye, which are unaudited except that the balance sheet as of December 31, 2007 is derived from audited financial statements, include all adjustments necessary to present fairly Buckeye’s financial position as of June 30, 2008 along with the results of Buckeye’s operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007 and Buckeye’s cash flows for the six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007.  The results of operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2008 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full year ending December 31, 2008.

Certain prior year amounts for product sales and the cost of product sales have been reclassified in the statement of income to conform to the current-year presentation.

Pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission, the condensed consolidated financial statements do not include all of the information and notes normally included with financial statements

7

Table of Contents

prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.  These condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements of Buckeye and the notes thereto for the year ended December 31, 2007 contained in Buckeye’s Annual Report on Form 10-K as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 28, 2008.

2. CONTINGENCIES

Claims and Proceedings

Buckeye and its subsidiaries in the ordinary course of business are involved in various claims and legal proceedings, some of which are covered by insurance. Buckeye is generally unable to predict the timing or outcome of these claims and proceedings. Based upon its evaluation of existing claims and proceedings and the probability of losses relating to such contingencies, Buckeye has accrued certain amounts relating to such claims and proceedings, none of which are considered material.

In March 2007, Buckeye was named as a defendant in an action entitled Madigan v. Buckeye Partners, L.P. filed in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of Illinois. The action was brought by the State of Illinois Attorney General acting on behalf of the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency. The complaint alleges that Buckeye violated various Illinois state environmental laws in connection with a product release from Buckeye’s terminal located in Harristown, Illinois on or about June 11, 2006 and various other product releases from Buckeye’s terminals and pipelines in the State of Illinois during the period of 2001 through 2006. The complaint seeks to recover state oversight costs, damages, and civil penalties and seeks injunctive action requiring Buckeye to remediate the environmental contamination resulting from the product releases. Buckeye believes it has meritorious defenses to the allegations set forth in the complaint.

Environmental Contingencies

In accordance with its accounting policy, Buckeye recorded operating expenses of $2.7 million and $1.8 million for the three months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively, and $4.6 million and $4.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively, related to environmental contingencies unrelated to claims and proceedings.

3.  BUSINESS COMBINATIONS AND DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS

Lodi Gas

On January 18, 2008, Buckeye acquired all of the member interests in Lodi Gas from Lodi Holdings, L.L.C. The cost of Lodi Gas was approximately $442.3 million in cash and consisted of the following (in thousands):

Of the contractual purchase price, $428.0 million was paid at closing and an additional $12.0 million was paid on March 6, 2008 upon receipt of approval from the California Public Utilities Commission for an expansion project known as Kirby Hills Phase II.  Buckeye acquired Lodi Gas because Buckeye’s management believes Lodi Gas represents an attractive opportunity to expand and diversify Buckeye’s operations into a new geographic area and a new commodity type, and will provide Buckeye a platform for growth in the natural gas storage industry.

8

Table of Contents

Buckeye has determined that the acquisition represented a business combination under the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 141, “Business Combinations” (“SFAS No. 141”).   The application of SFAS No. 141 requires that the total purchase price be allocated to the fair value of the assets acquired and the liabilities assumed based on their fair values at the acquisition date, with amounts exceeding the fair values being recorded as goodwill. The purchase price has been allocated, on a preliminary basis, to the tangible and intangible assets acquired, including goodwill, as follows (in thousands):

Buckeye is in the process of finalizing the purchase price allocation based on the valuations of plant, property and equipment, and goodwill.  The final purchase price allocation will likely adjust the preliminary amounts shown above.  Such changes may be material.  As discussed above, the activities of Lodi Gas are reported in a new operating segment called Natural Gas Storage.

Farm & Home

On February 8, 2008, Buckeye acquired all of the member interests of Farm & Home for approximately $146.0 million.  On April 15, 2008, Buckeye completed the sale of the retail operations of Farm & Home to a wholly owned subsidiary of Inergy, L.P. for approximately $52.6 million. The retail assets sold consisted primarily of property, plant and equipment as well as inventory and receivables.  Buckeye recorded no gain or loss on the sale of Farm & Home’s retail operations.  The retail operations of Farm & Home were not an integral part of Buckeye’s core operations and strategy, and the related retail assets and liabilities were determined to be discontinued operations on the date of Buckeye’s acquisition of Farm & Home because Buckeye decided to dispose of them as of that date.  Revenues from discontinued operations for the period February 8, 2008 to April 15, 2008 were approximately $19.0 million.

9

Table of Contents

Buckeye acquired Farm & Home because Buckeye’s management believes that the wholesale distribution operations of Farm & Home represent an attractive opportunity to further Buckeye’s strategy of improving overall profitability by increasing the utilization of Buckeye’s existing pipeline and terminal system infrastructure by marketing refined petroleum products in areas served by that infrastructure.  Buckeye has determined that the acquisition represented a business combination under the provisions of SFAS No. 141.  The application of SFAS No. 141 requires that the total purchase price be allocated to the fair value of the assets acquired and the liabilities assumed based on their fair values at the acquisition date, with amounts exceeding the fair values being recorded as goodwill.  The purchase price has been allocated, on a preliminary basis, to the tangible and intangible assets acquired, including goodwill, as follows (in thousands):

Buckeye is in the process of finalizing the purchase price allocation and will likely adjust the preliminary amounts shown above.  Such changes may be material.  The final allocation may include amounts related to identifiable intangible assets such as trade names, customer relationships and covenants not-to-compete.  As discussed above, the operations of Farm & Home that were retained by Buckeye are reported in a new operating segment called Energy Services.

10

Table of Contents

Proforma Unaudited Financial Results

The following unaudited summarized pro forma consolidated income statement information for the three months ended June 30, 2007 and the six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007 assumes that the acquisitions of Lodi Gas and Farm & Home had occurred as of the beginning of the periods presented.  The pro forma presentation below assumes that equity offerings by Buckeye that were used in part to fund the acquisition of Lodi Gas occurred effective January 1, 2007.  In the 2008 pro forma presentation, approximately $2.6 million of disposition-related expenses incurred by Lodi Gas in the period from January 1, 2008 to January 17, 2008 (prior to Buckeye’s ownership) have been excluded because the inclusion of these expenses would have distorted the financial results.  For Farm & Home, the results of the retail operations have been excluded from both periods presented. These pro forma unaudited financial results were prepared for comparative purposes only and are not indicative of actual results that would have occurred if Buckeye had completed these acquisitions as of the beginning of the periods presented or the results that will be attained in the future (in thousands, except per unit amounts):

11

Table of Contents

Other Acquisitions

On February 19, 2008, Buckeye acquired a refined petroleum products terminal in Niles, Michigan and a 50% ownership interest in a refined petroleum products terminal in Ferrysburg, Michigan from an affiliate of ExxonMobil Corporation for approximately $13.9 million.  Buckeye determined that the acquisition of the Niles, Michigan terminal and the 50% interest in the Ferrysburg, Michigan terminal should be accounted for as acquisitions of assets rather than an acquisition of a business as defined in SFAS No. 141.  Accordingly, Buckeye has allocated, on a preliminary basis, the cost of each acquisition to the various tangible assets acquired, principally property, plant and equipment as follows (in thousands):

Buckeye is in the process of finalizing the purchase price allocation and will likely adjust the preliminary amounts shown above.  Such changes may be material.

Effective May 1, 2008, Buckeye purchased the remaining 50% member interest in Wespac Pipe Lines - San Diego LLC from Kealine LLC not already owned by Buckeye for $9.3 million.  Buckeye is in the process of allocating the cost of the acquisition to the various tangible assets acquired, principally property, plant and equipment.

On June 20, 2008, Buckeye acquired a refined petroleum products terminal in Wethersfield, Connecticut from Hess Corporation for approximately $5.5 million.  Buckeye determined that the acquisition of the Wethersfield, Connecticut terminal should be accounted for as an acquisition of assets rather than an acquisition of a business as defined in SFAS No. 141.  Accordingly, Buckeye is in the process of allocating the cost of the acquisition to the various tangible assets acquired, principally property, plant and equipment.

4. PREPAIDS AND OTHER CURRENT ASSETS

Prepaids and other current assets consist of the following:

12

Table of Contents

5. ACCRUED AND OTHER CURRENT LIABILITIES

Accrued and other current liabilities consist of the following:

6.     DEBT AND CREDIT FACILITIES

Long-term debt consists of the following:

* Buckeye makes semi-annual interest payments on these notes with the principal balances outstanding to be paid on or before the due dates as shown above.

The fair value of Buckeye’s aggregate debt was estimated to be $1,346.0 million at June 30, 2008 and $828.7 million at December 31, 2007.  The values at June 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007 were based on approximate market value on the respective dates.

On January 11, 2008, Buckeye sold $300.0 million aggregate principal amount of 6.05% Notes due 2018 (the “6.05% Notes”) in an underwritten public offering.  Proceeds from this offering, after underwriters’ fees and expenses, were approximately $298.0 million and were used to partially pre-fund the Lodi Gas acquisition.  In connection with this debt offering, Buckeye settled the two forward-starting interest rates swaps discussed in Note 7 below, which resulted in a settlement payment by Buckeye of $9.6 million that is being amortized as interest expense over the ten year term of the 6.05% Notes.

13

Table of Contents

Credit Facility

Buckeye has a borrowing capacity of $600.0 million under an unsecured revolving credit agreement (the “Credit Facility”), which may be expanded up to $800.0 million subject to certain conditions and upon the further approval of the lenders.   The Credit Facility’s maturity date is August 24, 2012, which may be extended by Buckeye for up to two additional one-year periods. Borrowings under the Credit Facility bear interest under one of two rate options, selected by Buckeye, equal to either (i) the greater of (a) the federal funds rate plus 0.5% and (b) SunTrust Bank’s prime rate plus an applicable margin, or (ii) the London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”) plus an applicable margin. The applicable margin is determined based on the current utilization level of the Credit Facility and ratings assigned by Standard & Poor’s and Moody’s Investor Services for Buckeye’s senior unsecured non-credit enhanced long-term debt.  At June 30, 2008, Buckeye had $157.0 million in borrowings outstanding under the Credit Facility.  At December 31, 2007, Buckeye did not have any amounts outstanding under the Credit Facility.  At June 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, Buckeye had committed $1.3 million and $1.5 million in support of letters of credit, respectively.  The obligations for letters of credit are not reflected as debt on Buckeye’s consolidated balance sheet.

The Credit Facility requires Buckeye to maintain a specified ratio (the “Funded Debt Ratio”) of no greater than 5.00 to 1.00 subject to a provision that allows for increases to 5.50 to 1.00 in connection with certain future acquisitions.  The Funded Debt Ratio is calculated by dividing consolidated debt by annualized EBITDA, which is defined in the Credit Facility as earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, depletion and amortization, in each case excluding the income of certain majority-owned subsidiaries of Buckeye and equity investments (but including distributions from those majority-owned subsidiaries and equity investments).  As discussed below, the Credit Facility was amended in January 2008 to, among other things, change the definition of consolidated debt.  At June 30, 2008, Buckeye’s Funded Debt Ratio was 4.28 to 1.00.  As provided for in the Credit Facility, the entire balance of Farm & Home’s line of credit, or $72.7 million, was excluded from the calculation of consolidated debt and the Funded Debt Ratio.

In addition, the Credit Facility contains other covenants including, but not limited to, covenants limiting Buckeye’s ability to incur additional indebtedness, to create or incur liens on its property, to dispose of property material to its operations, and to consolidate, merge or transfer assets.  At June 30, 2008, Buckeye was not aware of any instances of noncompliance with the covenants under its Credit Facility.

On January 28, 2008, Buckeye entered into an amendment to the Credit Facility which permits Farm & Home and its wholly owned subsidiary, Buckeye Energy Services LLC (“BES”), to incur up to $250.0 million of secured indebtedness related to working capital financing.  The Credit Facility, as amended, also permits these subsidiaries to (i) issue performance bonds not to exceed $50.0 million, (ii) incur $5.0 million of equipment lease obligations and liens on equipment, (iii) incur up to $5.0 million of indebtedness owing to major oil companies, and (iv) loan or advance up to $5.0 million to retail distributors of transportation fuels.  Finally, the amendment states that the lesser of the amount of this debt or the sum of 90% of qualified inventory and 70% of qualified accounts receivable held by Farm & Home at the balance sheet date may be excluded when calculating Buckeye’s Funded Debt Ratio as discussed above.

Buckeye Energy Services Credit Agreement

On May 20, 2008, Farm & Home and BES (the “Borrowers”) entered into a Credit Agreement (the “BES Credit Agreement”) with BNP Paribas, as Administrative Agent, Collateral Agent, and Lead Arranger and, on July 18, 2008, amended the BES Credit Agreement.  The BES Credit Agreement, as amended, provides for borrowings of up to $160.0 million, which amount may be increased to $250.0 million subject to customary conditions, including procurement of the requisite lender commitments.  Under the BES Credit Agreement, borrowings accrue interest at the Borrowers’ election at (i) the Administrative Agent’s Cost of Funds (as defined in the BES Credit Agreement) plus 1.75%, (ii) the Eurodollar Rate (as defined in the BES Credit Agreement) plus 1.75% or (iii) the Base Rate (as defined in the BES Credit Agreement) plus 0.25%.  The BES Credit Agreement also permits Daylight Overdraft Loans (as defined in the BES Credit Agreement), Swingline Loans (as defined in the BES Credit Agreement) and letters of credit.  Such alternative extensions of credit are subject to certain conditions as defined in the BES Credit Agreement.  The BES Credit Agreement is secured by liens on certain assets of the Borrowers, including their

14

Table of Contents

inventory, cash deposits (other than certain accounts), investments and hedging accounts, receivables and intangibles.

The BES Credit Agreement replaces the credit agreement that Buckeye had assumed upon the acquisition of Farm & Home.

The balance outstanding under the BES Credit Agreement was approximately $72.7 million at June 30, 2008, all of which was classified as a current liability.  The BES Credit Agreement requires the Borrowers to meet certain financial covenants, which are summarized below:

At June 30, 2008, the Borrowers’ Consolidated Tangible Net Worth (as defined in the BES Credit Agreement) and Consolidated Net Working Capital (as defined in the BES Credit Agreement) were $85.9 million and $51.1 million, respectively, and the Maximum Consolidated Leverage Ratio (as defined in the BES Credit Agreement) was 1.53 to 1.0.

In addition, the BES Credit Agreement contains other covenants, including, but not limited to, covenants limiting the Borrowers’ ability to incur additional indebtedness, to create or incur certain liens on property, to consolidate, merge or transfer assets, to make dividends or distributions, to dispose of property, to make investments, to modify their risk management policy, or to engage in business activities materially different from those presently conducted.  At June 30, 2008, the Borrowers were not aware of any instances of noncompliance with the covenants under the BES Credit Agreement.

7.  DERIVATIVES

Commodity Derivatives

The Energy Services segment primarily uses exchange-traded petroleum futures contracts to manage the risk of market price volatility on its petroleum product inventories and its fixed price sales contracts. The derivative contracts used to hedge petroleum product inventories are classified as fair value hedges.  Changes in the fair value of the inventory hedges are recorded in current period earnings along with the related gain or loss on the hedged asset.  Hedge ineffectiveness is measured quarterly based on the correlation of changes in fair value between the derivative contract and the hedged item during the hedge period. The Energy Services segment has elected not to use hedge accounting with respect to its fixed price sales contracts. Therefore, its fixed price sales contracts and the related futures contracts used to offset those sales contracts are all marked-to-market on the balance sheet with gains and losses being recognized in earnings during the period.

15

Table of Contents

As of June 30, 2008, the Energy Services segment had derivative assets and liabilities as follows:

Substantially all of the liability noted above for unrealized losses of $1.3 million related to inventory hedges will be realized in the third quarter of 2008 as the related inventory is sold.  Gains recorded in the second quarter on inventory hedges that were ineffective were approximately $0.2 million.  As of June 30, 2008, open petroleum derivative contracts varied in duration, but did not extend beyond August 2009.

Finance Derivatives

In January 2008, Buckeye terminated two forward-starting interest rate swap agreements associated with the 6.05% Notes and made a payment of $9.6 million in connection with the termination.  In accordance with SFAS No. 133, “Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities” (“SFAS No. 133”), Buckeye has recorded the amount in other comprehensive income and will amortize the amount of the payment into interest expense over the ten-year term of the 6.05% Notes.  Interest expense increased by $0.2 million and $0.4 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2008, respectively, as a result of the amortization of the termination payment.

8. FAIR VALUE MEASURMENTS

In September 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (the “FASB”) issued SFAS No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements” (“SFAS No. 157”).  This statement clarifies the definition of fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value, and expands the disclosures on fair value measurements.  SFAS No. 157 was effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007 and interim periods within that year.  Buckeye adopted SFAS No. 157 on January 1, 2008.

Pursuant to SFAS No. 157, fair value measurements are characterized in one of three levels based upon the input used to arrive at the measurement.  The three levels include:

Level 1:  Level 1 inputs are quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities as of the reporting date.  Active markets are those in which transactions for the asset or liability occur with sufficient frequency and volume to provide pricing information on an ongoing basis.

Level 2:  Level 2 inputs include the following:

·                  Quoted prices in active markets for similar assets or liabilities.

·                  Quoted prices in markets that are not active for identical or similar assets or liabilities.

·                  Inputs other than quoted prices, that are observable for the asset or liability.

·                  Inputs that are derived primarily from or corroborated by observable market data by correlation or other means.

16

Table of Contents

Level 3:  Level 3 inputs are unobservable inputs for the asset or liability.

The following table sets forth the fair value measurement of Buckeye’s assets and liabilities that are subject to SFAS No. 157 as of June 30, 2008:

The value of the Level 1 futures contracts and the inventory hedges noted above were based on quoted market prices obtained from the New York Mercantile Exchange.  The value of the Level 1 asset held in trust was obtained from quoted prices from brokers.  The value of the Level 2 fixed price sales contract liability was based on observable market data related to the obligation to provide petroleum products.

9. EARNINGS PER LIMITED PARTNERSHIP UNIT

Emerging Issues Task Force (“EITF”) Issue No. 03-06 (“EITF 03-06”), “Participating Securities and the Two-Class Method Under FASB Statement No. 128,” addresses the computation of earnings per share by entities that have issued securities other than common stock that contractually entitle the holder to participate in dividends and earnings of the entity.  EITF 03-06 provides that Buckeye GP’s interest in net income is to be calculated based on the amount that would be allocated to Buckeye GP if all of Buckeye’s net income for the period was distributed, and not on the basis of actual cash distributions for the period.  The application of EITF 03-06 may have an impact on Buckeye’s earnings per limited partnership unit (“LP Unit”) in future periods if there are material differences between net income and actual cash distributions or if other participating securities are issued.  See Note 16 for a discussion of recent accounting pronouncements affecting earnings per LP Unit.

The following table is a reconciliation of the number of LP Units used in the basic and diluted earnings per LP Unit calculations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007: