As filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on July
15, 2005
Registration No. 333-101562
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
(Amendment 6)
FORM SB-2/A
REGISTRATION STATEMENT
Under
The Securities Act of 1933
INSTACARE CORP.
(Name of Small Business Issuer in Its Charter)
7371
(Primary Standard Industrial Classification Code Number)
Nevada |
2660 Townsgate Road, Suite 300 Westlake Village, CA 91361 (805) 446-1973 |
91-2105842 |
(State of Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization) |
(Address, and Telephone Number of Principal Executive Offices and Principal Place of Business) |
(I.R.S. Employer Identification Number) |
Corporate Agents of Nevada
8275 South Eastern Avenue, Suite 119Las Vegas, NV89123(702) 400-9973
(Name, Address, and Telephone Number of Agent for Service)
Copies of Communications to:
Thomas C. Cook, Esq.
Law Offices of Thomas C. Cook, Ltd.
2921 N. Tenaya Way, Suite 234
Las Vegas, Nevada 89128
Telephone: (702) 952-8519
Fax: (702) 952-8521
Approximate date of commencement of proposed sale to the public: From time to time after this registration statement becomes effective.
If this form is filed to register additional securities for an offering pursuant to Rule 462(b) under the Securities Act of 1933 (the "Securities Act"), check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering.
If this form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to Rule 462(c) under the Securities Act, check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering.
If this form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to Rule 462(d) under the Securities Act, check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering.
If the delivery of the prospectus is expected to be made pursuant to Rule 434, please check the following box.
If any of the securities being registered on this form are being offered on a delayed or continuous basis pursuant to Rule 415 under the Securities Act of 1933, please check the following box. X
CALCULATION OF REGISTRATION FEE
Title of Each Class Of Securities To Be Registered |
Number of Shares To Be Registered (1) |
Proposed Maximum Offering Price Per Share (2) |
Proposed Maximum Aggregate Offering Price |
Amount of Registration Fee |
Common Stock |
518,000,000 |
$0.0120 |
$6,216,000 |
$1,219.37 |
Estimated solely for purposes of calculating the registration fee pursuant to Rule 457. Represents the maximum amount of shares of our common stock that we will be required to register in accordance with our Merger Agreement as well as shares issued and distributed pursuant to consulting agreements, note conversions, and shares underlying notes and warrant conversions.
Represents the average closing bid price of our common stock as of July 15, 2005.
The registrant hereby amends this registration statement on such date or dates as may be necessary to delay its effective date until the registrant shall file a further amendment which specifically states that this registration statement shall thereafter become effective in accordance with Section 8(a) of the Securities Act or until the registration statement shall become effective on such date as the Commission, acting pursuant to said Section 8(a), may determine.
Information contained herein is subject to completion or amendment. A registration statement relating to these securities has been filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. We may not sell these securities until the registration statement filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission is effective. This prospectus is not an offer to sell these securities and it is not soliciting an offer to buy these securities in any state in which the offer or sale is not permitted.
2
Subject to Completion, Dated July 15, 2005
PROSPECTUS
INSTACARE CORP.
518,000,000 Shares of Common Stock
This prospectus relates to the registration of up to 518,000,000 shares of our common stock ("instaCare Corp." or "instaCare".) Of these shares, 400,000,000 are being registered for the benefit of Mercator Advisory Group LLC and its affiliated funds, as shares that underlie the conversion preference of instaCare's Series "C" Convertible Preferred Stock We seek to register 300,000,000 common shares that underlie the Preferred shares and 100,000,000 common shares that underlie warrants. Some or all of these 400,000,000 shares may be issued according to the terms of the conversion preference of instaCare's Series "C" Convertible Preferred Stock and the exercise of instaCare's common stock purchase warrants.
In addition, instaCare desires to register the 99,000,000 common stock shares it has placed in escrow, as collateral and for conditioned conversion rights owing to a promissory note and its renewal agreements with Pinnacle Investment Partners, LP. instaCare also seeks to register 19,000,000 shares that have been issued to Pinnacle Investment Partners, LP and CJR Capital, Inc.pursuant to loan fees, loan renewal agreements and finders fees that resulted from the transaction involving the promissory note and its renewals with Pinnacle Investment Partners, LP.
There is no minimum number of shares that must be sold in this offering. instaCare has received the proceeds from the sale of the preferred stock and promissory note. Although we will not receive any of the proceeds from sales of the common stock by the selling stockholders under this prospectus. We only seek to have registered the shares for the benefit of the stockholders. To the knowledge of instaCare, the stockholders have not made any arrangements with any brokerage firm, underwriter or agent for the sale of the shares of common stock.
Our common stock is quoted on the OTC Bulletin Board ("OTCBB") under the symbol INCA but it is not listed on a national securities exchange. The latest per share price , based on the average of the bid and asked price as of July 15, 2005, was $0.02 per share.
Investing in the common stock involves a high degree of risk, which is described in the "Risk Factors " beginning on page 7 of this prospectus.
Neither the Securities and Exchange Commission nor any state securities commission has approved or disapproved of these securities or passed upon the adequacy or accuracy of this prospectus. Any representation to the contrary is a criminal offense.
The date of this prospectus is July 15, 2005.
3
Table of Contents
Risk Factors |
7 |
Use of Proceeds |
9 |
Determination of Offering Price |
9 |
Dividend Policy |
9 |
Issuance of Securities to the Selling Stockholders |
9 |
Plan of Distribution |
10 |
Legal Proceedings |
12 |
Directors and Executive Officers |
13 |
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management |
14 |
Description of Securities |
15 |
Market for Common Stock |
16 |
Commission's Position on Indemnification for Securities Act Liabilities |
17 |
Description of Business |
19 |
Form and year of organization |
19 |
Material reclassifications |
19 |
Business of the Issuer |
22 |
Product Applications |
23 |
Distribution Methods |
24 |
New Products |
26 |
Competition business conditions |
27 |
Source of principal suppliers |
28 |
Dependence on a few major customers |
28 |
Patent and trademark applications |
28 |
Government approval and effect on us |
29 |
Research and Development Expenditures |
30 |
Employees |
30 |
Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations |
31 |
Overview |
31 |
Note payable |
33 |
Use of Funds |
34 |
Expenditure |
34 |
Internal and External Sources of Liquidity |
35 |
Critical Accounting Policy and Estimates |
36 |
Description of Property |
36 |
Certain Relationships And Related Transactions |
37 |
PART II |
2 |
4
Prospectus Summary
This summary highlights selected information contained elsewhere in this prospectus. It does not contain all of the information you should consider before investing in instaCare's common stock. You should carefully consider all information contained in this prospectus and particularly the section on Risk Factors set forth below before investing in the shares of common stock we seek to register under this prospectus.
instaCare Corp.
instaCare Corp., a Nevada corporation, was formed in July 2000 as Promedicius, Inc,. a Nevada Corporation, with a principal business objective of providing services to medical practitioners. In 2001, ATR Search Corp., a developmental stage company, was formed with a principal business objective to place part-time, temporary or project oriented workers and contractors that had specific and hard to find information technology skills required by large businesses. In June 2001, Promedicius, Inc. changed its name to Medicius, Inc. In June 2002, ATR Search Corp. merged with Medicius, Inc. Medicius, at that time, had a principal business objective to offer physicians, licensed medical service providers such as diagnostic testing laboratories, and medical insurers Internet enhanced, wireless ("Wi-Fi") information technology and data management technology (IT).. After the merger, we changed our name to CareDecision Corporation. On April 14, 2005 we changed our name from CareDecision Corp. to instaCare Corp . Subsequently, we have pursued the following business:
On August 4, 2004 instaCare received a proposal for a possible merger with two private shareholder owned corporations based in Scottsdale, Arizona. These companies, both controlled by Mr. Ronald R. Kelly, are:
On August 16, 2004 we completed a Preliminary Agreement to merge with these entities. On November 18, 2004 we incorporated two subsidiary companies, Pharma Tech Solutions, Inc. a Nevada corporation, and PDA Services, Inc., a Nevada corporation to facilitate these mergers.
On November 3, 2004, and amended on December 27, 2004, we entered into a Definitive Agreement that called for a series of transactions to be completed between instaCare, Pharma Tech Solutions, Inc. and CareGeneration, Inc., that when accomplished would merge CareGeneration, Inc. into instaCare's subsidiary Pharma Tech Solutions, Inc., whereby Pharma Tech Solutions, Inc. would be the surviving entity. The parties concluded the activities surrounding this merger on January 27, 2005, and the filing of Merger certificates was completed on February 25, 2005. We have incorporated the products and services of the former CareGeneration, Inc. into our business model. On April 14, 2005 we changed our name from CareDecision Corp. to instaCare Corp.to better reflect our core business activities.
5
Talks between InstaCare and Futurecom Global, Inc. ended on April 30, 2005 at the request of Ronald Kelly, the controlling shareholder of Futurecom Global, Inc.
instaCare's fiscal year ends on December 31. Our principal executive office is located at 2660 Townsgate Road, Suite 300, Westlake Village, CA 91361. Our telephone number is (805) 446-1973. The common stock is quoted on the OTCBB under the trading symbol "INCA", but it is not listed on a national securities exchange. Because the common stock is not listed for trading on any national securities exchange there may be a limited market for instaCare's shares.
The Offering
This prospectus relates to the registration of up to 518,000,000 shares of common stock of instaCare. Of these shares, 400,000,000 are being registered for Mercator Advisory Group LLC and its affiliated funds, as shares that underlie the conversion preference of instaCare's Series "C" Convertible Preferred Stock and common stock purchase warrants issued as a part of instaCare's Series "C" Convertible Preferred Stock subscription agreement with Mercator Advisory Group LLC. The registrant is seeking to register 300,000,000 shares that underlie the Preferred shares and 100,000,000 shares that underlie warrants. Some or all of these 400,000,000 shares may be issued according to the terms of the conversion preference of instaCare's Series "C" Convertible Preferred Stock and the exercise of instaCare's common stock purchase warrants.
In addition, instaCare desires to register the 99,000,000 common stock shares it has placed in escrow as collateral and for conditioned conversion rights owing to a promissory note and its renewal agreements with Pinnacle Investment Partners, LP. instaCare also seeks to register another 19,000,000 shares that have been issued to Pinnacle Investment Partners, LP and CJR Capital, Inc.as loan fees, loan renewal agreements and finders fees pursuant to the promissory note with Pinnacle Investment Partners, LP.
Selling Stockholders
Mercator Advisory Group LLC, Mercator Momentum Fund, LP, Monarch Pointe Fund, Ltd., CJR Capital, Inc. and Pinnacle Investment Partners, LP.
Net Proceeds to instaCare
instaCare will receive no proceeds from sales of common stock by the selling stockholders.
Detailed Summary Financial Information
For the three months ended |
||
March 31, |
||
Statement of operations data: |
2005 |
2004 |
Gross profit |
$ 196,649 |
$ 55,392 |
Expenses: | ||
General & administrative expenses |
174,936 |
59,082 |
Payroll expense |
256,869 |
80,540 |
Professional fees |
278,618 |
238,530 |
Stock-based compensation - related party |
115,290 |
- |
Stock-based compensation - consulting |
346,380 |
485,119 |
Software development |
- |
69,641 |
Hardware costs |
10,075 |
- |
Impairment loss on operating assets |
- |
111,473 |
Depreciation |
13,138 |
33,315 |
Other total income (expenses): |
(486,251) |
(734,442) |
Net (loss) |
$ (1,484,909) |
$ (1,756,750) |
Net (loss) per share - basic and fully diluted |
$ (0.00) |
$ (0.01) |
6
Risk Factors
An investment in the securities being offered involves a high degree of risk. Prior to making any investment decision, prospective investors should carefully consider the following risk factors together with the other information presented in this prospectus including the financial statements and notes.
Our limited operating history could delay our growth and result in the loss of your investment.
We are considered a development stage company with an inception date of June 21, 2001 and thus have a limited operating history on which to base an evaluation of our business and prospects. Our prospects must be considered in light of the risks, expenses and difficulties frequently encountered by companies in their early stage of development. Such risks include, but are not limited to, dependence on the growth of use of electronic medical information and services, the adoption of PDA based Internet appliances for the transmission and display of medical information, the need to establish our brand name, the ability to establish a sufficient client base, the level of use of medical providers and the management of growth. To address these risks, we must maintain and increase our customer base, implement and successfully execute our business and marketing strategy, continue to develop and improve our point of care software and patient processing system, provide superior customer service, respond to competitive developments and attract, retain, and motivate qualified personnel. There can be no assurance that we will be successful in addressing such risks, and the failure to do so could lead to an inability to meet our financial obligations and therefore result in bankruptcy and the loss of your entire investment in instaCare's common shares.
We have historically lost money and losses are expected to continue in the near future, which means that we may not be able to continue operations unless we obtain additional funding.
We have historically lost money. InstaCare incurred accumulated net losses from July 06, 2000 (inception) through the period ended March 31, 2005 of $(11,708,281). In addition, instaCare's development activities since inception have been financially sustained by capital contributions. Future losses are likely to occur. Accordingly, we may experience significant liquidity and cash flow problems if we are not able to raise additional capital as needed and on acceptable terms. No assurances can be given that we will be successful in reaching or maintaining profitable operations.
We may not be able to retain our key personnel or attract additional personnel, which could affect our ability generate revenue sufficient to continue as a going concern diminishing your return on investment.
Our performance is substantially dependent on the services and on the performance of our Management. instaCare is, and will be, heavily dependent on the skill, acumen and services of our CEO Robert Cox, interim CFO, Secretary and Treasurer, Keith Berman.. Our performance also depends on our ability to attract, hire, retain and motivate our officers and key employees. The loss of the services of our executives could result in lost revenue depending on the length of time and effort required to find a qualified replacement. We have not entered into a long-term employment agreements with our key personnel and currently have no "Key Employee" life insurance policies.
Our future success may also depend on our ability to identify, attract, hire, train, retain and motivate other highly skilled technical, managerial, marketing and customer service personnel. Competition for such personnel is intense, and there can be no assurance that we will be able to successfully attract, assimilate or retain sufficiently qualified personnel. If we are unable to attract, retain, and train the necessary technical, managerial, marketing and customer service personnel, our expectations of increasing our clientele could be hindered, and the profitability of instaCare reduced.
Recent, and Possible future issuances of common stock will have a dilutive affect on existing shareholders.
instaCare is authorized to issue up to 1,250,000,000 Shares of common stock. As of the most recent practicable date, there are 447,140,421 shares of common stock issued and outstanding. Additional issuances of common stock may be required to raise capital, to acquire stock or assets of other companies, to compensate employees or to undertake other activities without stockholder approval. These additional issuances of common stock will increase outstanding shares and further dilute stockholders' interests. Because our common stock is subject to the existing rules on penny stocks and thinly traded, a large sale of stock, such as the shares we seek to have registered via this registration statement, may result in a large drop in the market price of our securities and substantially reduce the value of your investment.
7
Our common stock has been relatively thinly traded, may experience high price volatility and we cannot predict the extent to which a trading market will develop.
Our common stock has traded on the Over-the-Counter Bulletin Board. Our common stock is thinly traded compared to larger more widely known companies in our industry. Thinly traded common stock can be more volatile than common stock trading in an active public market. We cannot predict the extent to which an active public market for the common stock will develop or be sustained after this offering.
Achieving market acceptance of new or newly integrated products and services is likely to require significant efforts and expenditures.
Achieving market acceptance for new or newly integrated products and services is likely to require substantial marketing efforts and expenditure of significant funds to create awareness and demand by participants in the healthcare industry. In addition, deployment of new or newly integrated products and services may require the use of additional resources for training our existing sales and customer service personnel and for hiring and training additional salespersons and customer service personnel. There can be no assurance that the revenue opportunities from new or newly integrated products and services will justify amounts spent for their development, marketing and rollout.
We could be subject to breach of warranty claims if our software products, information technology systems or transmission systems contain errors, experience failures or do not meet customer expectations.
We could face breach of warranty or other claims or additional development costs if the software and systems we sell or license to customers or use to provide services contain undetected errors, experience failures, do not perform in accordance with their documentation, or do not meet the expectations that our customers have for them. Undetected errors in the software and systems we provide or those we use to provide services could cause serious problems for which our customers may seek compensation from us. We attempt to limit, by contract, our liability for damages arising from negligence, errors or mistakes. However, contractual limitations on liability may not be enforceable in certain circumstances or may otherwise not provide sufficient protection to us from liability for damages.
If our systems or the Internet experience security breaches or are otherwise perceived to be insecure, we could lose existing clients and limit our ability to attract new clients.
A security breach could damage our reputation or result in liability. We retain and transmit confidential information, including patient health information. Despite the implementation of security measures, our infrastructure or other systems that we interface with, including the Internet, may be vulnerable to physical break-ins, hackers, improper employee or contractor access, computer viruses, programming errors, attacks by third parties or similar disruptive problems. Any compromise of our security, whether as a result of our own systems or systems that they interface with, could reduce demand for our services.
We have been granted certain copyrights and have applied to receive patent rights, and trademarks relating to our software. However, patent and intellectual property legal issues for software programs, such as our products, are complex and currently evolving.
Patent applications are secret until patents are issued in the United States, or published in other countries, therefore, we cannot be sure that we are first to file any patent application. Our business model is somewhat unique in healthcare. We intend to use our technologies, primarily the technology that allows for the safe, secure and near seamless transmission of sensitive medical information from the point of care, directly to our mail order pharmacy. Should any of our patent claims be compromised or if, for example, one of our competitors has filed or obtained a patent before our claims have been prosecuted, or should a competitor with more resources desire to litigate and force us to defend or prosecute any patent rights, our ability to develop the market for our mail order pharmacy could be severely compromised.
8
Our auditors have expressed substantial doubt as to our ability to continue as a going concern.
Due to our status as a developmental stage company and our lack of revenue sufficient to support existing operations, there is substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern. We may need to obtain additional financing in the event that we are unable to realize sufficient revenue or collect accounts receivable when we emerge from the development stage. We may incur additional indebtedness from time to time to finance acquisitions, provide for working capital or capital expenditures or for other purposes. However, we currently anticipate that our operating cash flow along with the funds raised from financing will be sufficient to meet our operating expenses for at least the next 12 to 24 months. There can be no assurance that we will have funds sufficient to continue operations, and the failure to do so could lead to an inability to meet our financial obligations and therefore result in bankruptcy and the loss of your entire investment in instaCare's common shares.
Use of Proceeds
All net proceeds from the sale of the common stock covered by this prospectus will go to the selling stockholders. instaCare will not receive any proceeds from the sale of the common stock in this offering.
Determination of Offering Price
The prices at which the shares of common stock may actually be sold will be determined by the prevailing public market price for the shares or by negotiations in private transactions.
Dividend Policy
It is instaCare's present policy not to pay cash dividends and to retain future earnings for use in the operations of the business and to fund future growth. Any payment of cash dividends in the future will be dependent upon the amount of funds legally available; earnings, financial condition, capital requirements and other factors that the Board of Directors may think are relevant. instaCare does not contemplate or anticipate paying any cash dividends on the common stock in the foreseeable future.
Issuance of Securities to the Selling Stockholders
The table below sets forth ownership information regarding the selling stockholders. For purposes of calculating the percentage of common stock outstanding, any securities not outstanding that are subject to options, warrants or conversion privileges are deemed outstanding for the purposes of computing the percentage of outstanding securities owned by the selling stockholders. Unless otherwise indicated, the selling stockholders have the sole power to direct the voting and investment over the shares owned by them.
The following table lists the preferred shares held by our Convertible "C" Preferred shareholders that were distributed pursuant to our Corporation Shares of Series C Convertible Preferred Stock and Common Stock Warrants Subscription Agreements at $0.02 and $0.03 cents per common share and associated agreement documents. None of the selling shareholders are broker-dealers or affiliates of broker-dealers.
COMMON |
|||
STOCK |
AMOUNT |
||
PURCHASE |
INVESTORS |
||
AMOUNT OF |
2 CENT |
WANT |
|
INVESTOR4 |
INVESTMENT1 |
WARRANTS |
REGISTERED3 |
Mercator Advisory Group LLC |
$0 |
25,000,000 |
25,000,000 |
Mercator Momentum Fund, LP |
$660,000 |
8,250,000 |
8,250,000 |
Monarch Pointe Fund, Ltd. |
$0 |
16,750,000 |
16,750,000 |
TOTAL |
$660,000 |
50,000,000 |
50,000,000 |
9
COMMON |
|||
STOCK |
AMOUNT |
||
PURCHASE |
INVESTORS |
||
AMOUNT OF |
3 CENT |
WANT |
|
INVESTOR4 |
INVESTMENT1 |
WARRANTS |
REGISTERED3 |
Mercator Advisory Group LLC |
$0 |
25,000,000 |
25,000,000 |
Mercator Momentum Fund, LP |
$0 |
8,250,000 |
8,250,000 |
Monarch Pointe Fund, Ltd. |
$1,340,000 |
16,750,000 |
16,750,000 |
TOTAL |
$1,340,000 |
50,000,000 |
50,000,000 |
After the offering is complete, Mercator Advisory Group LLC will own 11.18%, Mercator Momentum Fund, LP will own 3.69% and Monarch Pointe Fund, Ltd. will own 7.49% of our common stock par value $0.001 based on a total of 447,140,421 shares issued and outstanding as of the most recent practicable date. None of the control person(s) listed in footnote 4 below have held any position, office, or have had any other material relationship with instaCare or any of our predecessors or affiliates. In addition, none of the selling shareholders held any shares of our common stock before the offering.
Footnotes:
$.006667 X 2,000,000
The following table lists the shares that were issued pursuant to the making and renewals of the promissory note with CJR Capital, Inc. and Pinnacle Investment Partners, LP.
PARTY |
DATE |
CONSIDERATION |
ESCROW SHARES |
SHARES ISSUED AS FEES AND RENEWAL FEES |
CJR Capital, Inc.1 |
3/24/04 |
$0 |
0 |
1,000,000 |
9/24/04 |
$0 |
0 |
2,000,000 |
|
2/10/05 |
$0 |
0 |
4,000,000 |
|
Pinnacle Investment Partners, LP2 |
3/24/04 |
$700,000 |
14,000,000 |
1,000,000 |
9/24/04 |
$0 |
2,000,000 |
2,000,000 |
|
2/10/05 |
$400,000 |
83,000,000 |
9,000,000 |
|
TOTAL |
$1,100,000 |
99,000,000 |
19,000,000 |
Plan of Distribution
The selling stockholders may, from time to time, sell any or all of their shares of common stock on any stock exchange, market or trading facility on which the shares are traded or in private transactions. These sales may be at fixed or negotiated prices. The selling stockholders may use any one or more of the following methods when selling shares:
10
Ordinary brokerage transactions and transactions in which the broker-dealer solicits purchasers;
Block trades in which the broker-dealer will attempt to sell the shares as agent but may position and the resell a as principal to facilitate the transaction;
Purchases by a broker-dealer as principal and resale by the broker-dealer for its account;
An exchange distribution in accordance with the rules of the applicable exchange;
Privately negotiated transactions;
Short sales;
Broker-dealers may agree with the selling stockholders to sell a specified number of such shares at a stipulated price per share;
A combination of any such methods of sale; and
Any other method permitted pursuant to applicable law.
The selling stockholders may also sell shares under Rule 144 under the Securities Act, if available, rather than under this prospectus.
The selling stockholders may also engage in short sales against the box, puts and calls and other transactions in our securities or derivatives of our securities and may sell or deliver shares in connection with these trades.
Broker-dealers engaged by the selling stockholders may arrange for other brokers-dealers to participate in sales. Broker-dealers may receive commissions or discounts from the selling stockholders (or, if any broker-dealer acts as agent for the purchaser of shares, from the purchaser) in amounts to be negotiated. The selling stockholders do not expect these commissions and discounts to exceed what is customary in the types of transactions involved.
Any profits on the resale of shares of common stock by a broker-dealer acting as principal might be deemed to be underwriting discounts or commissions under the Securities Act. Discounts, concessions, commissions and similar selling expenses, if any, attributable to the sale of shares will be borne by a selling stockholder. The selling stockholders may agree to indemnify any agent, dealer or broker-dealer that participates in transactions involving sales of the shares if liabilities are imposed on that person under the Securities Act.
The selling stockholders may from time to time pledge or grant a security interest in some or all of the shares of common stock owned by them and, if they default in the performance of their secured obligations, the pledgees or secured parties may offer and sell the shares of common stock from time to time under this prospectus after we have filed an amendment to this prospectus under Rule 424(b)(3) or other applicable provision of the Securities Act of 1933 amending the list of selling stockholders to include the pledgee, transferee or other successors in interest as selling stockholders under this prospectus.
The selling stockholders also may transfer the shares of common stock in other circumstances, in which case the transferees, pledgees or other successors in interest will be the selling beneficial owners for purposes of this prospectus and may sell the shares of common stock from time to time under this prospectus after we have filed an amendment to this prospectus under Rule 424(b)(3) or other applicable provision of the Securities Act of 1933 amending the list of selling stockholders to include the pledgee, transferee or other successors in interest as selling stockholders under this prospectus.
The selling stockholders and any broker-dealers or agents that are involved in selling the shares of common stock may be deemed to be "underwriters" within the meaning of the Securities Act in connection with such sales. In such event, any commissions received by such broker-dealers or agents and any profit on the resale of the shares of common stock purchased by them may be deemed to be underwriting commissions or discounts under the Securities Act.
11
We are required to pay all fees and expenses incident to the registration of the shares of common stock. We have agreed to indemnify the selling stockholders against certain losses, claims, damages and liabilities, including liabilities under the Securities Act.
The following is an estimate of the expenses incident to the registration of the shares of common stock.
Nature of Expenses |
Amount |
|
SEC Registration Fee |
$ |
1,219 |
Accounting Fees and Expenses |
$ |
10,500 |
Legal Fees and Expenses |
$ |
15,000 |
Printing Expenses |
$ |
1,000 |
Blue Sky Qualification Fees and Expenses |
$ |
1,000 |
Transfer Agent's Fee |
$ |
2,500 |
TOTAL |
$ |
31,219 |
The selling stockholders have advised us that they have not entered into any agreements, understandings or arrangements with any underwriters or broker-dealers regarding the sale of their shares of common stock, nor is there an underwriter or coordinating broker acting in connection with a proposed sale of shares of common stock by any selling stockholder. If we are notified by any selling stockholder that any material arrangement has been entered into with a broker-dealer for the sale of shares of common stock, if required, we will file a supplement to this prospectus. If the selling stockholders use this prospectus for any sale of the shares of common stock, they will be subject to the prospectus delivery requirements of the Securities Act.
The anti-manipulation rules of Regulation M under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 will apply to sales of our common stock and activities of the selling stockholders.
Transfer Agent
The name and address of our transfer agent is as follows: Pacific Stock Transfer Company, 500 E. Warm Springs Road, Suite 240, Las Vegas, NV 89119; 702-361-3033.
Legal Proceedings
On July 6, 2005, instaCare filed a complaint in the United States District Court, for the Central District of California (Case Number CV 05-4932-RSWL),against Ronald Kelly, and others, seeking damages for Fraud, Breach of Fiduciary Duty, RICO violations, Conversion, Breach of Contract / Breach of Corporate Merger Agreement, Declaratory Relief, Accounting, Injunctive Relief, and such other Ancillary Relief as may be available. Ronald Kelly was the President and CEO of CareGeneration, which was merged with Pharatech Solutions, a subsidiary instaCare. As a result of the merger, Ronald Kelly was appointed to the Board of Directors of instaCare.
Substantial irregularities came to the attention of other members of the
Board of Directors, the facts of which are set forth in the complaint in the
above referenced action. As a result of that information, Mr. Kelly was
removed from the Board of Directors, and approximately 10 days later tendered
his resignation, without explanation. As a further result of this
information, we have brought our lawsuit for damages."
We nor our subsidiaries are named defendants in any legal proceedings. Our recent acquisition target CareGeneration, Inc. ("CareGen"), was not subject to any legal proceedings at the closing of our acquisition.
However Ronald Kelly, a former director and the former controlling shareholder of the acquisition target CareGeneration, Inc, is himself a party to several actions:
Ronald Kelly is the guarantor of a contract between Kelly Company World Group, Inc., an Illinois corporation, and Purity Wholesale Grocers, Inc. d/b/a Supreme Distributors Company ("Purity"), an Illinois corporation, in which Purity demanded payment of $1,905,972. The suit was filed in the Circuit Court of McDonough County, Illinois on August 6, 2004. This Breach of Guarantee suit is related to Kelly's guarantee of a contract that disputed. Mr. Kelly's counsel represented to us that the parties to this suit were engaged in on-going settlement negotiations to resolve the matter. However, this representation was not factual and it was learned that Mr. Kelly consented to judgment in this matter in December 2004, subject to a plan of cure. Purity filed the Stipulation to Judgment in May 2005 and is now enforcing same. 2. Ronald Kelly is a named party in a suit titled World Automated Systems, Ltd. et al vs. Omni Cellular, Ltd. et al. The suit alleges Breach of Contract, Fraudulent Misrepresentation, Fraud, Consumer Fraud, and Deceptive Business Practice and Conversion in the amount of $250,000.00 plus punitive damages and costs. The case was filed in Circuit Court of Cook County, Illinois on July 29, 2004. A motion to dismiss was filed on behalf of the defendants and subsequently the Plaintiffs filed a Motion for Leave to Amend Complaint. As of this date Plaintiffs have not filed an amended complaint. Mr. Kelly is as yet unable to evaluate the likelihood of a favorable outcome.
12
We were in the process of investigating additional litigation involving Mr. Kelly that was not disclosed to the Company while he served as a director.
In April 2004 we entered into an agreement with DataFuzion, Inc. ("Fuzion"), a Colorado based medical software and medical systems company. Among other things this agreement called for us to provide license to certain of its software and to provide introduction to agents and service organizations that were capable of assisting Fuzion's stated desire to become a fully reporting public company. The agreement called for Fuzion to render 10% of its capital stock as consideration. As a portion of its consideration, we also agreed to advance certain monies to Fuzion's chosen agents for these services. We completed the introductions and advanced the funds called for under the agreement. Although we have not yet resolved our claims, DataFuzion, Inc. has contacted us and we remain optimistic that we will be able to favorably resolve our issues.
Directors and Executive Officers
The following table sets forth the name, age, positions, and offices or employments for the past three years as of December 31, 2004 for our executive officers and directors. Members of the board are elected and serve for one year terms or until their successors are elected and qualify. All of the officers serve at the discretion of the Board of Directors of instaCare.
NAME |
AGE |
POSITION |
TERM |
Robert Cox |
45 |
President, Director, and Chief Executive Officer |
Since June 2001 |
Keith Berman |
51 |
Secretary, Treasurer and Director |
Since January 2003 |
Robert Jagunich |
58 |
Director |
Since January 2003 |
Robert L. Cox, President and Director - prior to joining instaCare, was the Chief Executive Officer, President and Director of Tower Realty Trust, Inc., a publicly traded Real Estate Investment Trust ("REIT") from October 1997 to May 2001. From March 1995 to October 1997 Mr. Cox served as the Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer of Tower Equities, when Tower Equities became a public company (Tower Realty Trust, Inc.). From March 1987 to March 1995, Mr. Cox served as Vice President of Development and Construction of Tower Equities, where his main responsibilities included supervising all development and construction projects. Mr. Cox graduated in 1983 with a BA from Florida State University. Mr. Cox does not hold any directorships of other reporting companies.
Keith Berman, Secretary, Treasurer and Director - has for over the past 15 years, been involved in the development of healthcare software including Intranet and Internet systems. From July 1999 to present, Mr. Berman has held the position of President, founder and director of Caredecision.net, Inc. a private company engaged in e-health technology development. From January 1996 to June 1999 Mr. Berman was the President and founder of Cymedix, the operating division of Medix Resources, Inc., now Ramp Corp. (RCO). Cymedix was a pioneer company in what was then known as i-health (Internet healthcare) now the e-health industry. Mr. Berman received a BA in 1975 and an MBA in 1977, from Indiana University.
13
Robert Jagunich, Director - has 27 years of experience in the medical systems and device industry. From August 1992 to present, he has held the position of President at New Abilities Systems, a privately held manufacturer of advanced electronic systems used in rehabilitation. He also provides consulting services to companies such as Johnson and Johnson and has served as a senior executive in such publicly held companies as Laserscope and Acuson. From April 1996 to December 1997 Mr. Jagunich acted as a director of Cymedix Corporation, the operating entity of Medix Resources, Inc., now Ramp Corp. (AMEX:RCO). He received his BS in 1969, and his MS and MBA in 1971, from the Univ. of Michigan.
Mr. Cox and Mr. Berman, the officers, are treated as exempt employees and work whatever hours are necessary to complete company business. Both work far in excess of 40-hour weeks on company business. Mr. Jagunich attends meetings of the board of directors when held."
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management
The following table sets forth certain information concerning the beneficial ownership of instaCare's outstanding classes of stock based on ownership information reported by the stockholders as of the latest practicable date, and on the number of shares outstanding as of the latest practicable date by each person known by instaCare to own beneficially more than 5% of each class, by each of instaCare's directors and executive officers and by all officers and directors as a group. instaCare is authorized to issue up to 1,250,000,000 shares of common stock. As of the latest practicable date, there are 447,140,421 shares of common stock issued and outstanding; therefore, 22,357,021 shares constitute a position of 5%. Unless otherwise indicated below, to instaCare's knowledge, all persons listed below have sole voting and investment power with respect to their shares of common stock except to the extent that spouses share authority under applicable law. All shares are held directly.
The percentages are calculated on the basis of the amount of outstanding securities plus, for each person or group, any securities that person or group has the right to acquire within 60 days pursuant to options, warrants, and conversion privileges or other rights.
Common Stock
Name and Address |
Shares Beneficially Owned |
Percentage of Shares Outstanding |
Keith Berman 1623 Elmsford Westlake, CA 91361 |
8,143,991 |
1.82% |
Robert L. Cox 16 Wood Hollow Lane Fort Salonga, NY 11768 |
2,205,915 |
0.49% |
Robert Jagunich 765 Christine Drive Palo Alto, CA 94303 |
6,009,293 |
1.34% |
Pinnacle Investment Partners LP1,2 Hank Gracin ESQ 50 Charles Lindberg Blvd, Suite 505 Uniondale, NJ 11583 |
98,000,000 |
21.92% |
Total ownership by our officers and directors (three individuals) |
16,359,199 |
3.65% |
Footnotes
The control person of Pinnacle Investment Partners, LP is Chris Janish.
14
Description of Securities
Our authorized capital stock is 1,250,000,000 shares of common stock, par value $0.001 per share and 5,000,000 shares of preferred Stock, par value $.001 per share. As of the most recent practicable date, we had issued 447,140,421 of our shares of common stock, 207,526 shares of preferred stock and 20,000 shares of preferred series "C" stock.
For purposes of illustration only, assuming a hypothetical conversion of $100.00 (one share of Series C Preferred stock), while "Market Price" for our common stock is $0.02 at the time of conversion, and the "Conversion Price" per share for our Series C Preferred Stock shall be equal to eighty percent (80%) of the Market Price, the Conversion Ratio (formula) will be $100.00/$0.016, or 6,250 shares per $100.00. This hypothetical conversion will allow the 20,000 shares of Series C Preferred Stock to be converted into 125,000,000 shares of Common Stock. On the other hand, if the Market Price is $0.03 at the time of conversion, the Conversion Ratio (formula) will be $100.00/$0.024, 4,167 shares per $100.00, allowing the 20,000 shares of Preferred Stock to be converted into 83,333,333 shares of Common Stock.
The following brief description of our common stock and preferred stock is subject in all respects to Nevada law and to the provisions of our Articles of Incorporation filed with the state of Nevada on March 2, 2001, as amended filed with the state of Nevada on May 9, 2001 and our Bylaws, copies of which were submitted with our initial 10-SB Registration Statement filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on September 27, 2001. In addition, to our amended Articles of Incorporation filed with the state of Nevada on August 2, 2002 copies of which were submitted with our June 30, 2002 Form 10-QSB filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
Common Stock
As a holder of our common stock:
Additionally, there is no cumulative voting for the election of directors.
Preferred Stock
We can issue shares of preferred stock in series with such preferences and designations as our board of directors may determine. Our board can, without shareholder approval, issue preferred stock with voting, dividend, liquidation, and conversion rights. This could dilute the voting strength of the holders of common stock and may help our management impede a takeover or attempted change in control.
Nevada Anti-Takeover Provisions
The anti-takeover provisions of Sections 78.411 through 78.445 of the Nevada Corporation Law apply to instaCare Section 78.438 of the Nevada law prohibits us from merging with or selling instaCare or more than 5% of our assets or stock to any shareholder who owns or owned more than 10% of any stock or any entity related to a 10% shareholder for three years after the date on which the shareholder acquired the instaCare shares, unless the transaction is approved by the Board of Directors of instaCare. The provisions also prohibit us from completing any of the transactions described in the preceding sentence with a 10% shareholder who has held the shares more than three years and its related entities unless the transaction is approved by our Board of Directors or a majority of our shares, other than shares owned by that 10% shareholder or any related entity. These provisions could delay, defer or prevent a change in control of instaCare.
15
Anti-Dilution
The shares of instaCare's preferred stock shall not be subject to dilution unless all the holders of the preferred stock vote to change this preference. In addition, the preferred stock shall maintain its status even if the common stock undertakes a reverse or forward split of its shares. The preferred stock cannot be diluted unless it is converted to common stock.
Market for Common Stock
The common stock is traded on the OTC Bulletin Board. The following table sets forth the high and low bid prices of instaCare's common stock for the periods indicated, as reported by published sources. The prices reflect inter-deal prices without retail mark-up, markdown or commission and may not represent actual transactions.
Low |
High |
|||
2005 Fiscal Year |
||||
First Quarter |
$ |
0.013 |
$ |
0.03 |
2004 Fiscal Year |
||||
First Quarter |
$ |
0.028 |
$ |
0.119 |
Second Quarter |
$ |
0.023 |
$ |
0.083 |
Third Quarter |
$ |
0.019 |
$ |
0.057 |
Fourth Quarter |
$ |
0.015 |
$ |
0.03 |
2003 Fiscal Year |
||||
First Quarter |
$ |
0.04 |
$ |
0.08 |
Second Quarter |
$ |
0.04 |
$ |
0.075 |
Third Quarter |
$ |
0.04 |
$ |
0.075 |
Fourth Quarter |
$ |
0.03 |
$ |
0.05 |
2002 Fiscal Year |
||||
First Quarter |
$ |
0.06 |
$ |
0.30 |
Second Quarter |
$ |
0.03 |
$ |
0.08 |
Third Quarter |
$ |
0.03 |
$ |
0.11 |
Fourth Quarter |
$ |
0.04 |
$ |
0.11 |
As of the most recent applicable date, there were 268 individuals of record of our common stock. Our shares of common stock are currently traded on the OTC Electronic Bulletin Board under the symbol "INCA". There is no assurance that an active trading market will develop that will provide liquidity for instaCare's existing shareholders or for the selling shareholders whose common stock is being registered through this filing.
On January 1, 2003, we adopted our "2003 Stock Option Plan" (the "Plan") and granted incentive and nonqualified stock options with rights to purchase 25,000,000 shares of our $0.001 par value common stock. We issued 14,600,000 shares of stock pursuant to the plan during the year ended December 31, 2003.
The following is a summary of activity of outstanding stock options under the 2003 Stock Option Plan:
|
Number Of Shares |
Weighted Average Exercise Price |
|
Balance, December 31, 2003 |
5,150,000 |
- |
|
Options granted |
-0- |
$0.043 |
|
Options exercised |
(-0-) |
0.043 |
|
Balance, December 31, 2004 |
5,150,000 |
0.043 |
|
Exercisable, December 31, 2004 |
5,150,000 |
$0.043 |
16
The following is a summary of information about the 2003 Stock Option Plan options outstanding at December 31, 2004:
Shares Underlying Options Outstanding |
Shares Underlying Options Exercisable |
||||
Range of Exercise Prices |
Shares Underlying Options Outstanding |
Average Remaining Contractual Life |
Weighted Average Exercise Price |
Shares Underlying Options Exercisable |
Weighted Average Exercise Price |
$0.040 - 0.050 |
5,150,000 |
0 years |
$0.043 |
5,150,000 |
$0.043 |
Pro forma information regarding net income and net income per share has been determined as if we had accounted for our non-employee stock-based compensation plans and other stock options under the fair value method of SFAS No. 123. The fair value of each option and warrant grant are estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following weighted-average assumptions used for grants under the fixed option plan:
2004 |
2003 |
|||
Average risk-free interest rates |
5.05 |
% |
5.05 |
% |
Average expected life (in years) |
2 |
2 |
||
Volatility |
51.0 |
% |
51.0 |
% |
The Black-Scholes option valuation model was developed for use in estimating the fair value of short-term traded options that have no vesting restrictions and are fully transferable. In addition, option valuation models require the input of highly subjective assumptions including expected stock price volatility. Because our employee stock options have characteristics significantly different from those of traded options and because changes in the subjective input assumptions can materially affect the fair value estimate, in management's opinion the existing models do not necessarily provide a reliable single measure of the fair value of our employee stock options. During 2003, there were no options granted with an exercise price below the fair value of the underlying stock at the date of issuance.
As of December 31, 2003, outstanding stock options to acquire shares of common stock on a one-for-one basis totaled 5,150,000 at a weighted average exercise price of $.043. As of December 31, 2003, stock options in the Plan remaining to be issued totaled 5,250,000. The Plan stock options are 100% vested from the grant date.
The Commission has adopted regulations which generally define a "penny stock" to be any equity security that has a market price less than $5.00 per share. Thus, our common stock is presently a penny stock subject to rules that impose additional sales practice requirements on broker-dealers who sell such securities to persons other than established customers and accredited investors. This would generally include institutions with assets in excess of $5,000,000 or individuals with net worth in excess of $1,000,000 or annual income exceeding $200,000 or $300,000 jointly with their spouse. Based on the above, investors who are not established customers of broker-dealers or accredited investors may find it difficult to purchase our common stock without satisfying numerous requirements.
Commission's Position on Indemnification for Securities Act Liabilities
Section 78.751 of the Nevada General Corporation Laws provides as follows: 78.751 Indemnification of officers, directors, employees and agents; advance of expenses.
1. A corporation may indemnify any person who was or is a party or is threatened to be made a party to any threatened, pending or completed action, suit or proceeding, whether civil, criminal, administrative or investigative, except an action by or in the right of the corporation, by reason of the fact that he is or was a director, officer, employee or agent of the corporation, or is or was serving at the request of the corporation as a director, officer, employee or agent of another corporation, partnership, joint venture, trust or other enterprise, against expenses, including attorney's fees, judgments, fines and amounts paid in settlement actually and reasonably incurred by him in connection with the action, suitor proceeding if he acted in good faith and in a manner which he reasonably believed to be in or not opposed to the best interests of the corporation, and, with respect to any criminal action or proceeding, had no reasonable cause to believe his conduct was unlawful. The termination of any action, suit or proceeding by judgment, order, settlement, conviction, or upon a plea of nolo contendere or its equivalent, does not, of itself, create a presumption that the person did not act in good faith and in a manner which he reasonably believed to be in or not opposed to the best interests of the corporation, and that, with respect to any criminal action or proceeding, he had reasonable cause to believe that his conduct was unlawful.
17
2. A corporation may indemnify any person who was or is a party or is threatened to be made a party to any threatened, pending or completed action or suit by or in the right of the corporation to procure a judgment in its favor by reason of the fact that he is or was a director, officer, employee or agent of the corporation, or is or was serving at the request of the corporation as a director, officer, employee or agent of another corporation, partnership, joint venture, trust or other enterprise against expenses, including amounts paid in settlement and attorneys' fees actually and reasonably incurred by him in connection with the defense or settlement of the action or suit if he acted in good faith and in a manner which he reasonably believed to be in or not opposed to the best interests of the corporation. Indemnification may not be made for any claim, issue or matter as to which such a person has been adjudged by a court of competent jurisdiction, after exhaustion of all appeals therefrom, to be liable to the corporation or for amounts paid in settlement to the corporation, unless and only to the extent that the court in which the action or suit was brought or other court of competent jurisdiction determines upon application that in view of all the circumstances of the case, the person is fairly and reasonably entitled to indemnity for such expenses as the court deems proper.
3. To the extent that a director, officer, employee or agent of a corporation has been successful on the merits or otherwise in defense of any action, suit or proceeding referred to in subsections 1 and 2, or in defense of any claim, issue or matter therein, he must be indemnified by the corporation against expenses, including attorneys' fees, actually and reasonably incurred by him in connection with the defense.
4. Any indemnification under subsections 1 and 2, unless ordered by a court or advanced pursuant to subsection 5, must be made by the corporation only as authorized in the specific case upon a determination that indemnification of the director, officer, employee or agent is proper in the circumstances. The determination must be made: (a) By the stockholders: (b) By the board of directors by majority vote of a quorum consisting o directors who were not parties to act, suit or proceeding; (c) If a majority vote of a quorum consisting of directors who were not parties to the act, suit or proceeding so orders, by independent legal counsel in a written opinion; or (d) If a quorum consisting of directors who were not parties to the act, suit or proceeding cannot to obtained, by independent legal counsel in a written opinion; or
5. The Articles of Incorporation, the Bylaws or an agreement made by the corporation may provide that the expenses of officers and directors incurred in defending a civil or criminal, suit or proceeding must be paid by the corporation as they are incurred and in advance of the final disposition of the action, suit or proceeding, upon receipt of an undertaking by or on behalf of the director or officer to repay the amount if it is ultimately determined by a court of competent jurisdiction that he is not entitled to be indemnified by corporation. The provisions of this subsection do not affect any rights to advancement of expenses to which corporate personnel other than the directors or officers may be entitled under any contract or otherwise by law.
6. The indemnification and advancement of expenses authorized in or ordered by a court pursuant to this section: (a) Does not exclude any other rights to which a person seeking indemnification or advancement of expenses may be entitled under the articles of incorporation or any bylaw, agreement, vote of stockholders or disinterested directors or otherwise, for either an action in his official capacity or an action in another capacity while holding his office, except that indemnification, unless ordered by a court pursuant to subsection 2 or for the advancement of expenses made pursuant to subsection 5, may not be made to or on behalf of any director or officer if a final adjudication establishes that his act or omissions involved intentional misconduct, fraud or a knowing violation of the law and was material to the cause of action. (b) Continues for a person who has ceased to be a director, officer, employee or agent and endures to the benefit of the heirs, executors and administrators of such a person. Insofar as indemnification for liabilities arising under the Securities Act may be permitted to directors, officers and controlling persons of the Registrant pursuant to the foregoing provisions, or otherwise, the Registrant has been advised that in the opinion of the Securities and Exchange Commission such indemnification is against public policy as expressed in the Securities Act and is, therefore, unenforceable. In the event that a claim for indemnification against such liabilities (other than the payment by the registrant of expenses incurred or paid by a director, officer or controlling person of the Registrant in the successful defense of any action, suit or proceeding) is asserted by such director, officer or controlling person in connection with the securities being registered, the Registrant will, unless in the opinion of its counsel the matter has been settled by controlling precedent, submit to a court of appropriate jurisdiction the question whether such indemnification by it is against public policy as expressed in the Securities Act and will be governed by the final adjudication of such issue.
18
Insofar as indemnification for liabilities under the Securities Act of 1933 may be permitted to our directors, officers, and controlling persons, we have been advised that in the opinion of the Securities and Exchange Commission such indemnification is against public policy as expressed in the Securities Act of 1933 and therefore unenforceable.
Description of Business
Business Development
Form and year of organization
instaCare Corp., a Nevada corporation, was formed July 6, 2000 as Promedicius, Inc., a development stage company.
Material reclassifications- Any material reclassification, merger, consolidation, or purchase or sale of a significant amount of assets not in the ordinary course of business
In June 2002, ATR Search Corp. merged with Medicius, Inc., formally Promedicius, a Nevada corporation, also a development stage company. Medicius, had a principal business objective to offer physicians, licensed medical service providers such as diagnostic testing laboratories, and medical insurers Internet enhanced, wireless ("Wi-Fi") information technology and data management technology (IT).
In January 2003, we adopted our "2003 Stock Option Plan" (the "2003 Plan") and granted incentive and nonqualified stock options with rights to purchase 25,000,000 shares of our $0.001 par value common stock. We issued 14,600,000 shares of stock pursuant to the 2003 Plan during the year ended December 31, 2003. We issued an additional 10,400,000 shares of stock pursuant to the 2003 Plan during the year ended December 31, 2004.
In March and April 2004 we issued 6,510,000 shares of our $0.001 par value common stock in order to settle the disputes with investors and agents which arose over the M&E Note, and which allowed the M&E Note to be settled and converted. The value of the shares was $377,136 and is recorded as a loss on debt settlement during the year ended December 31, 2004.
On March 24, 2004, instaCare was loaned $700,000 from Pinnacle Investment Partners, LP (Pinnacle). The Secured Convertible Promissory Note, which bears interest at the rate of 12% per annum (unless we fail to pay any installment or principal or interest when due, then the interest rate will then accrue at a rate of 24% per annum on the unpaid balance until the payment default is cured), initially matured on September 25, 2004, but was extended for an additional six months at our option, and was secured by 14,000,000 shares of our $0.001 par value common stock. Under the terms of this Note, Pinnacle at its option, could have elected, at any time or from time to time, to convert some or all of the then-outstanding principal amount of the Note into shares of our common stock at a conversion price of $0.08 per share, unless such conversion would result in Pinnacle being deemed the "beneficial owner," within the meaning of Rule 13d-3 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. For the period ended December 31, 2004, there were no conversions.
On August 4, 2004 instaCare received a proposal for a possible merger with two private shareholder owned corporations based in Scottsdale, Arizona. These companies, both controlled by Ronald R. Kelly are:
19
On August 5, 2004 we adopted our "2004 Employee Stock Option Plan" (the "Plan") and granted incentive and nonqualified stock options with rights to purchase 50,000,000 shares of our $0.001 par value common stock. We issued 50,000,000 shares of stock pursuant to the plan during the year ended December 31, 2004.
On October 12, 2004, we entered into various consulting and service agreements with Dr. Joseph Wolf, Leslie-Michelle Abraham and M. Thais Abraham to perform strategic and developmental services to facilitate our proposed merger with CareGeneration, Inc., among others. As consideration, we granted stock options to purchase 24,000,000 shares of $0.001 par value common stock at a strike price of $0.02 per share pursuant to our 2004 Stock Option Plan. The shares are registered and free-trading under our 2004 Employee Stock Option plan filed via Form S-8. The value of the options on the grant date using the Black-Scholes Model is $285,000, which has been recorded as compensation expense on the Statement of Operations as of December 31, 2004.
On October 28, 2004, we entered into a second consulting and service agreement with Dr. Joseph Wolf to perform an enterprise value report for our proposed acquisition of CareGeneration, Inc. inclusive of that company's recent receipt of certain prescription drug distribution licenses and other considerations. As consideration, we granted stock options to purchase 6,500,000 shares of $0.001 par value common stock at a strike price of $0.018 per share pursuant to our 2004 Stock Option Plan. The shares are registered and free-trading under our 2004 Employee Stock Option plan filed via Form S-8. The value of the options on the grant date using the Black-Scholes Model is $72,310.00, which has been recorded as compensation expense on the Statement of Operations as of December 31, 2004.
Initiated on November 3, 2004, and amended on December 27, 2004, we entered into a Definitive Agreement that called for a series of transactions to be completed between our to-be-formed subsidiary, Pharma Tech Solutions, Inc., and CareGeneration, Inc., the merger target that when accomplished would merge CareGeneration, Inc. into the to-be-formed subsidiary Pharma Tech Solutions, Inc., whereby Pharma Tech Solutions, Inc. would be the surviving entity.
On November 18, 2004 we incorporated two subsidiary companies, Pharma Tech Solutions, Inc. a Nevada corporation, and PDA Services, Inc., a Nevada corporation, to facilitate these mergers.
On December 24, 2004 we entered into an agreement of understanding by and among InstaCare Corp. and, Pharma Tech Solutions, Inc., and CareGeneration, Inc. and Kelly Co. World Group, Inc. This agreement, among other things, allowed us to assume management and control over CareGeneration Inc.'s prescription drug distribution business and to do business under the previous business name as a means to facilitate the merger. The merger closed on February 25, 2005.
Pursuant to the agreements CareGeneration shareholders received 39,375,000 shares of Pharma Tech Solutions' common stock, equaling approximately 49% of the outstanding shares of Pharma Tech Solutions, and 42,500,000 of InstaCare's common stock in exchange for all of the shares of the CareGeneration's common stock and all of the CareGeneration's preferred stock. In addition, we were required at closing to place in escrow 100,000,000 common stock shares, which may be paid to CareGeneration stockholders subject to earn-out provisions based on performance. As of the date of this registration statement, after the expiration of two of the milestone dates, only 50,000,000 of these shares were still available for "earn-out."
On February 1, 2005, we entered into a financial consulting agreement with Pylon Management, Inc. expiring on December 31, 2005. Pursuant to the agreement, Pylon Management will be compensated for services in the form of option to purchase up to 18,500,000 shares of our common stock at $0.02 per share. As of the date of the registration statement, no options have been exercised.
20
On February 5, 2005, instaCare adopted our "2005 Stock Option Plan" and granted incentive and nonqualified stock options with rights to purchase 90,000,000 shares of our $0.001 par value common stock. On February 15, 2005, instaCare issued 63,000,000 shares of stock pursuant to the plan to officers.
On February 7, 2005, we reached an agreement with three entities: Mercator Momentum Fund, LP, Monarch Pointe Fund, Ltd. and Mercator Advisory Group, LLC (collectively the "investing entities"). Under this agreement, in return for a total investment of $2,000,000 USD from the investing entities, the last portion of which was received on February 22, 2005, instaCare agreed to issue and sell to the Purchasers an aggregate of: (a) Twenty Thousand (20,000) shares of our Series "C" Convertible Preferred Stock, $1000.00; and, (b) One Hundred Million (100,000,000) warrants to acquire up to One Hundred Million (100,000,000) shares of instaCare's common stock, 50,000,000 of the warrants having an exercise strike price of $.02 and 50,000,000 of the warrants having an exercise strike price of $.03.
Holders of series "C": convertible stock shall not have the right to vote on matters that come before the shareholders. Series "C" convertible preferred stock may be converted, the number of shares into which one share of Series "C" Preferred Stock shall be convertible shall be determined by dividing the Series "C" Purchase price by the existing conversion price which shall be equal to eighty percent of the market price rounded to the nearest thousandth, not to exceed $0.02 per share. Series "C" convertible stock shall rank senior to common stock in the event of liquidation. Holders' of Series "C" convertible stock shall be entitled to a mandatory monthly dividend equal to the share price multiplied by the prime interest rate plus five tenths percent. Series "C" convertible stock shall have a redemptions price of $100 per share, subject to adjustments resulting from stock splits, recapitalization, or share combination.
The number of shares the investing entities wish to convert and those warrant shares that any of the investing entities may acquire at any time are subject so that the aggregate number of shares of common stock of which such investing entities and all persons affiliated with the investing entities have beneficial ownership (calculated pursuant to Rule 13d-3 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) remains less than ten percent of our then outstanding common stock.
On February 7, 2005, the Board of Directors approved the issuance of warrants to purchase 100,000,000 shares of our common stock to Mercator LLP in connection with financing arrangements. Such warrants are exercisable over a period of three years at an exercise price of $0.02 for the initial 50,000,000 shares and $0.03 for the remaining 50,000,000 shares. The value of the warrants using the Black-Scholes pricing model was $100,000, which was recorded as financing costs as of March 31, 2005.
On February 7, 2005, the board of directors approved the issuance of warrants to purchase 3,500,000 shares of our common stock to Pylon Management for payment of consulting services. The warrants are exercisable at a price of $0.02 per share and vest over a period of three years. The value of the warrant using the Black-Scholes pricing model was $7,000, which was recorded as a consulting expense at March 31, 2005.
The weighted average of the assumptions used to value the warrants approved on February 7, 2005 were: Interest rate-3.50%, Days to expiration-1095, Stock price $0.02,Strike price-$0.02-$0.03, Volatility-0%, Yield-0%.
On February 10, 2005, we entered into a six-month consulting agreement with Victor Pallante for financial advisory services in exchange for cash in the amount of $50,000 due upon execution of the agreement and 5,000,000 shares of our $0.001 par value common stock to be considered earned over the term of the agreement and issued incrementally. We have expensed consulting fees in the amount of $50,000. We have delivered all of the shares required to date under this agreement.
On February 10, 2005, instaCare and Pinnacle entered into a Note Extension Agreement. Subject to the terms of this new agreement; on March 24, 2005, Pinnacle agreed to pay us $340,000 and (2) pay to Pinnacle's designee, CJR Capital, LLC, $60,000 towards Pinnacle's due diligence and legal expenses related to this new agreement. This new agreement has the following consequences: (1) the principal amount due under the Note automatically increases by $400,000 to $1,100,000; (2) the Maturity Date of the newly revised Note has been extended to April 24, 2006; and (3) the conversion price for those shares that underlie the Note was changed to $0.025.
21
In addition to the above, we agreed: (1) to deliver to Pinnacle's counsel an additional 83,000,000 shares of our common stock as additional escrow security, (2) issue to Pinnacle's designee, CJR Capital, LLC, 4,000,000 shares of our common stock towards Pinnacle's due diligence and legal expenses related to the revision of the Note; (3) issue to Pinnacle 9,000,000 shares of instaCare's common stock as a loan re-initiation fee; and (4) upon receipt of any properly crafted Seller's Representation Letter, deliver to Pinnacle an opinion of counsel to the effect that commencing March 24, 2005, Pinnacle may sell under Rule 144 promulgated under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, shares surrendered to Pinnacle in accordance with this agreement, on condition that (1) Pinnacle uses the proceeds to pay down the indebtedness under the Note as of immediately prior to effectiveness of this agreement and (2) ceases to sell any of those Shares once that indebtedness has been paid off in full. We have recorded a financing expense in the amount of $227,500, the fair market value of the underlying shares. All of the shares required under the Note were delivered.
On April 14, 2005, after receiving affirmative votes from more than 50% of the outstanding shares, we changed our name to instaCare Corp. to better reflect our evolved mission and business focus. Moving forward we plan to incorporate the products and services of the former CareGeneration, Inc. into our business model.
Business of the Issuer
Principal products and markets
Our principal business objective is to provide information technology (IT) for use with Internet-based communication, and network software systems and applications that reside on and function through a Windows CE-Based PDA- available from most major computer brands such as Sony, Dell, IBM and Palm -to the medical fields and the real estate industry.
Our software operates on any Microsoft Windows CE "Pocket PC" based handheld device, either in a wireless or "wired" mode. The local host for our PDA devices is a Windows (9X, NT, XP or later) based PC, which, in turn, permits one to eight of the aforementioned PDAs to be linked to either a medical network or hotel/motel wide area network, or help-desk network, and allows each PDA to become a uniquely identified mobile node on that network, independent of PC linkage, thereby, assisting the professional, whether he be a doctor, hotel owner, hotel guest or satellite broadcast technician.
Our medical field objectives includes:
22
Our real estate and hotel/motel objectives include building electronic commerce networks based on personal digital assistants (PDA) to the hotels, motels and single building, multi-unit apartment buildings with a desire to offer local advertising and electronic services to their tenants/guests.
Product Applications
Medical field Applications
Our medical technologies, the focus of one of the broad based patent applications now in the patent prosecution stage, are grounded in the central need to furnish the doctor with crucial point-of-care patient information rapidly and reliably via a PDA. The technologies utilize the power of the Internet to move large amounts of data to and from a variety of platforms securely via a powerful Windows CE based PDA designed for portability and upgradability. Totally compliant with the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 ("HIPAA") and the regulations that have since been promulgated, this PDA technology offers complicated and real-time point of care applications, previously legacy (mainframe or PC network) system applications, on a totally portable (PDA) appliance.
Our software is designed to integrate point of service applications. The medical appliance, the longest available product, monitors treatment protocols and up to the moment patient histories coupled with real-time on-line medical insurance claims submission. Our ultimate key to success resides in providing the private practice physician with the capability to, sequentially, learn about the history of his or her patient during, or prior to, entering the examining room, treat the patient and update the insurer of the episode of care. Accomplishing these objectives resolves a major dilemma for the health care provider; instantaneous communication of vital patient related information at or before the patient encounter.
Retail prescription Applications
The retail prescription business is often subsidized or funded by government benefits which seems to be aggressively moving to take advantage of the tremendous opportunity in retail pharmacy business via direct mail order distribution of prescriptions and related products/supplies. As part of its acquisition of CareGeneration, Inc. ("CGI"), PTSI, which is discussed below, acquired from CGI a proprietary, patent-pending retail mail order methodology for the distribution of pharmaceutical and healthcare supplies, which includes:
PTSI, a wholly owned subsidiary of instaCare, consists of two operating units, an active, licensed wholesale prescription drug distribution business, (license is undergoing transfer owing to the merger). PTSI is also an emerging Internet pharmacy just entering the retail drug prescriptions marketplace with the goal of delivering affordable, discounted prescriptions to the 40 million uninsured and underinsured consumers in the United States.
InstaCare's plan is to combine the newly acquired wholesale and retail drug distribution businesses now managed by Pharma Tech Solutions, Inc. (PTSI) and couple these businesses with the capabilities to connect physicians, using our PDA technologies, creating wholesale and retail ePharmacies similar in function to existing Internet pharmacies but directed to serving the large base of underinsured and uninsured Americans. PTSI is also currently delivering bulk prescription drugs on a wholesale basis to clients formerly serviced by the now merged CareGeneration, Inc.
23
Real Estate and Hotel/Motel Applications
In February 2003, we introduced ResidenceWare, a collection of Internet-enhanced communication, integration, and networking software systems and applications that reside on and function through a Windows CE-based PDA.
The Wi-Fi hotel/motel and apartment software makes use of much of the foundation technologies resident in the medical software products we offer. Given the differences in the two markets that the products service, the hotel/motel product is much more cooperative oriented, offering more consumer transactional services with the compliment of advertising tools.
Our technologies and products for the hotel/motel marketplace are designed to furnish hotel and motel guests with a menu of food service, office services and other remote service (dry cleaning for instance) choices that can be electronically ordered through our PDA-based information appliance for delivery directly to the hotel/motel guest. Employing commercially available Wi-Fi technology, we wrapped the time and volume tested commercial technologies into our patent pending PDA communication networking technologies, allowing us to offer complex and real-time point of sale applications through a totally wireless (PDA) appliance.
ResidenceWare was proprietarily and internally developed to service the need for a communication tool that could capitalize on recent technological advances to facilitate the relay of vital information directly and instantaneously to occupying tenants/guests. The systems were further augmented with the addition of advertising and e-commerce transactional features allowing merchants and service providers local to a ResidenceWare installation to electronically advertise and accept electronic orders for their products and services, which benefit not only the tenants or guests, but provide a potential alternate revenue stream for the commercial and residential real estate management companies, and hotel owners; for we employ a cooperative advertising model where we will share advertising revenue and electronic commerce revenue generated with the hotel/apartment building owner or manager.
Distribution Methods
Medical field distribution methods
Since inception, we have, and will continue, to focus our marketing efforts towards general medical and pharmaceutical medical applications through our E-Health handheld information appliance (PDA) software application package, and a permanently affixed handheld information appliance and Wi-Fi (wireless) network. Specifically we have marketed our line of MD@Hand PDA-based medical communication network products to the medical insurance and pharmacy benefits management segments of the healthcare markets.
We have implemented a targeted marketing campaign to educate healthcare providers about our medical technology solutions; targeting the physician providers who specialize in care for the indigent through the provision of technology, products and services that specifically respond to the needs and requirements of that market. We market our suite of medical software products by emphasizing their simplicity, portability, convenience and ease of use. We have chosen this focus due in part that State Medicaid and state and local welfare service providers are agencies do not typically participate in electronic services networks. This is primarily because care for the poor and indigent is logistically and financially burdensome due to a lack of resources at administrative levels. Put another way, there is usually no shortage of volunteer physicians but there is a shortage of program administrators, clinics, medical supplies and patient access. And we believe that a company that enters this loop to complete the link by providing utility and value to participants will be embraced. It is incumbent on us to therefore extend our marketing strategy to facilitate this reality.
Implicit to our medical marketing strategy is the contracting of state Medicaid and welfare programs, pharmacy benefit management entities, and medical case management entities within a targeted region that provides for system integration to our products and services. Once the network has been established our IT driven mail order pharmacy services will be distributed to those physicians included within the Medicaid or welfare agency Provider Network. We will rely on those contracted agencies to support and assist in the distribution of the product to the said physicians
24
Real Estate and Hotel/Motel distribution methods
Historically hotels and motels have adopted specific technology that enhances the utility of either the in-room telephone(s) or the in-room cable linked television. Thus, most of the innovations in hotels and motels have leveraged devices where innovation is waning. The electronics in telephones and telephone systems are limited and, and the television's design tends to limit its utility to one-way communication directed at the person watching. Even add-on devices such as satellite boxes for televisions and streaming LCDs for telephones add only limited functionality. The person operating the telephone or television must do something away from that device should something of interest catch their eye. Thus local merchants who may opt to advertise their products and services via closed circuit television or a streaming LCD on a telephone hope that the person watching will remember their message and visit their establishment or call for service.
Since mid-2003, we began focusing acutely on the marketing of our applications to the lodging sector through our ResidenceWare hotel/motel products and technologies. We also changed our products to reflect regional differences in the lodging sector, and by creating brochures and marketing materials.
Our products for hotels and motels are two-way devices. Local merchants who opt to advertise via our wireless networks through the use of our wireless ResidenceWare devices are assured that if the person viewing the advertisements sees something of interest, commerce can immediately be initiated at the device.
Our hotel/motel marketing strategy targets hotel/motel owners through the provision of technology and services that specifically respond to their needs and requirements. We have designed products to furnish hotel and motel guests with a menu of food service, office services and other remote services that include those features that specifically respond to the requirements of the hotel/motel owner. We believe that the combination of unique and responsive benefits derived from our system coupled with its simplicity, portability, convenience and ease of use will initiate and propel its implementation throughout the industry.
We concentrate each of our marketing efforts in specific target geographic locations that permit the completion of our density strategy crucial to sustained penetration and long-term success. The creation of such networks will be conducted in multiple geographic locations simultaneously. Upon their completion the process employed will be introduced and replicated in other locations targeted for access. We believe that the products we market to hotels and motels are unique.
In July 2003, we formalized an informal agreement with PCHertz.com, Inc. of Fargo, ND for the installation and sales of our ResidenceWare units. To date, PCHertz.com, Inc. has received orders for approximately 2900 units of our ResidenceWare product from hotels and motels across the United States. Through the contacts and efforts of PCHertz.com, Inc. we have since placed 1287 of these units in hotels.
PCHertz.com. is a sales agent for instaCare and primarily provides sales leads and sales consulting services. They also provide after-sales support and marketing and thus share in advertising and electronic commerce revenues generated by our ResidenceWare products. PCHertz is in the business of providing wireless environments and hotspots to hotels and motels. Our products are one of several PCHertz represents. In the case of instaCare, once a lead is received from PCHertz our staff is responsible for the closing of the sale, and the eventual billing and customer support. We also pay a monthly fee to PCHertz for product installation services in Midwest located hotels. Of our original 2900 orders, we have installed or initiated installation at 1287. We have also taken in an additional 270 hotel rooms (orders). We plan to complete installation of the orders this calendar year.
In the summer of 2003, we began discussions for a possible acquisition of MDU Services, Inc. (MDU), a Texas based company that was in several businesses, but of particular interest was MDU's business of providing kiosk-style access to the Internet at hotels and apartment buildings. Envisioning a more robust line of Internet connectivity products for the lodging and apartment management marketplaces, we made an initial offer to acquire MDU in the late fall of 2003. This acquisition has never progressed past the Due Diligence phase, even after we revised our offer in February 2004. Given the time that has passed and the lack of materials provided by MDU for our review, it is questionable whether this acquisition will close, although there are no penalties associated with a delayed closure. We remain interested in MDU's businesses.
25
New Products
SateLink
The development SateLink launched instaCare into a previously unexplored industry for us. Its creation, however, is wholly consistent with our corporate mission of introducing innovative technologies that resolve electronic communication barriers within multiple and diverse markets. We remain in discussions about potential sale or license of our SateLink product. And although we are optimistic, we have yet to sell any license agreement or have any service order placed for SateLink.
SateLink is our palm computer based product system designed to facilitate wireless process control, calibration, key coding and communications within the cable and media re-broadcast industries. SateLink seeks to resolve electronic communication barriers that inhibit customer communications and service and furnishes controls over the delivery of their products.
SateLink is a collection of communication, integration, and networking software systems that reside on a Windows CE-based PDA that communicates via Wi-Fi wired or satellite network connections. We believe SateLink will capitalize on recent innovations with PDA-sized GPS receivers to consolidate one or multiple GPS channels into a WiFi network to empower real-time satellite communications between a sponsoring corporation and virtual PDAs.
Pharmaceutical
On January 4, 2005 we transacted our first commerce under PTSI. Subsequently we have accepted additional orders for future business and fulfilled these orders. We have transacted all prescription drug distribution business transacted, whether under the agreement of December 24, 2004 or subsequent to the closing of the Pharma Tech merger, through our subsidiary.
The retail prescription business - often subsidized or funded by government benefits -- is a development stage enterprise moving to take advantage of the tremendous opportunity in retail pharmacy business via direct mail order distribution of prescriptions and related products/supplies. As part of our acquisition of CareGeneration, Inc. ("CGI"), PTSI also acquired from CGI a proprietary, patent-pending retail mail order methodology for the distribution of pharmaceutical and healthcare supplies which includes:
Bank Card
We has since taken this the Bank Card concept and technology and adapted the card into a powerful tool for tracking participants and processing transactions, providing a critical method for us to maintain a database of "members" or product/service receivers, and their transactions. This centrally located computer database will be used to store permanent customer history, maintain critical personal data, control and document each transaction processed, and provide the conduit for financial settlement. In addition, PTSI now has a pending agreement with a primary Chase partner/distributor to issue a collateralized debit card to each participant.
The Card will also provide a "prepayment" vehicle to eliminate any financial collection risk to us and can be used as a depository for incoming insurance payments on behalf of any member. The card will only allow funds to be extracted from the account by defined providers, for specific purpose, such as payment by insurance for prescriptions.
26
Medical Diagnostic and Medical Disposable Products
With our new prescription drug distribution business now coming on-line, we have decided to begin the practice of specializing in the distribution of medical diagnostic and medical disposable products associated with the on-going care of diabetes inflicted patients. This decision was made because the treatment and care of diabetes patients is an on-going lifetime process. To date we have entered into verbal agreements with distribution arms of two major manufactures and distributors of competing diabetic diagnostic products. We plan to add more of these diagnostic products as we further specialize into this medical niche.
Competition business conditions
Medical Field Competition
The medical industry is highly competitive in the attraction and retention of physician customers, insurers, government agency payors/sponsors and other medical providers. The number of competing companies and the size of such companies vary in different geographic areas. Generally, we are in competition with other PDA technology companies that offer medically related software suites, with the most effective competition coming from companies that possess greater capital resources, have longer operating histories, larger customer bases, greater name recognition and significantly greater financial, marketing and other resources than do we. However, only one competitor is currently using its technologies to pull through business from other ancillary products and services, and no other competitor is currently focused on healthcare services for the poor and indigent.
There are a number of small and large companies that provide some type of IT services at the point of care tying physicians to the healthcare systems:
The PatientKeeper product allows physicians to capture billing information for hospital-based accounts and purports to manage receivable transactions (a mix of a 1st generation feature on a 3rd generation technology). EPhysician's (Ramp Corp.) product offering allows prescription ordering from a PDA. On the surface, the former several of these companies provide systems that offer a few of the features of our system. However their approach involves a greater capital cost and is plagued with platform data management disadvantages compared to our product line. Most of these companies, PatientKeeper being the exception, have histories of financial troubles but nonetheless have garnered impressive valuations.
All of the technology-based companies listed above have a similar broad goal to deliver PDA based data management to physicians. One company, AllScripts (MDRX), appears to be positioned to advance to a market leadership position and is the aforementioned company employing a business model similar to us. However, this position is defined by a product distribution of less than 5000 physicians' office sites (2% of the total market) and does not possess a major factor in any medical trade area. Nonetheless, AllScripts employs a "pull-through" business model whereby their technology is employed at the physician's point of care in an effort to provide medical utility and medical content to that physician, but with the greater goal of selling that physician bulk pharmaceuticals.
There can be no assurance that we will be able to compete successfully against current and future competitors, and competitive pressures faced by us may have a material adverse effect on our business, prospects, financial condition and results of operations. Further, as a strategic response to changes in the competitive environment, management may from time to time make certain pricing, service or marketing decisions or acquisitions that could have a material adverse effect on our business, prospects, financial condition and results of operations.
27
Real Estate and Hotel/Motel Competition
We have yet to experience any substantial competition for our ResidenceWare products in the motel and apartment market segments, although we expect as this market niche expands we will see products from other software device companies adapt their product lines to enter into this marketplace.
With the increasing us of internet connections in hotels cable companies, WiFi connectivity providers, and kiosks will continue to be our strongest form of competition within this market segment.
Source of principal suppliers
Our suite of software-both medical and real estate and hotel/motel related- is proprietary code and does not require raw materials or principal suppliers. Our software is utilized through over-the-counter PDA's and computer products, as previously discussed. However, our ResidenceWare product is manufactured by third parities. Of the units placed, approximately one half (1/2) are units manufactured and/or distributed by companies such as ASUS, Casio and Viewsonic. The remaining units were manufactured by Dell Computer, Inc. (Dell). Since October 1, 2004 all units placed have been Dell units; and we do not foresee a change is utilizing solely Dell units in the foreseeable future.
Dependence on a few major customers
We have had limited medical technology sales, and we are dependent on a few major customers for our Residence Ware product line. Currently, or ResidenceWare product is only offered by PCHertz.com and us directly, and our medical software is offered through us, but promoted by multiple consultants.
Patent and trademark applications
We have filed multiple broad based patent applications and intend to file derivative patent applications covering the processes, use and functionality of our technologies and products. Additionally, in July 2002 we began application and received provisional approval for a family of trademarks making use of the mark MD@. The provisional approval applies to the first six individual marks applied for by us. Management is unsure whether we will pursue these applications given the changes to our business focus. More recently we began the process of applying for marks associated with our ResidenceWare hotel/motel products and technologies and our wireless SateLink products and technologies for the satellite media market.
On November 3, 2004, and amended on December 27, 2004, we entered into a Definitive Agreement that called for a series of transactions to be completed between instaCare, our Pharma Tech Solutions Inc. subsidiary and CareGeneration, Inc. One of these transactions contemplated the transfer of a certain prescription drug distribution license. Transfers of these licenses are complicated and time consuming often involving several state regulatory agencies. To mitigate any time delays associated with the license transfer, the companies entered into an exclusive business relationship whereby instaCare and its subsidiary could operate while the license was in transfer. All closing activities surrounding the merger of the companies were completed on January 27, 2005. Merger certificates are were filed on February 15, 2005. Pharma Tech Solutions, Inc., which is majority controlled by InstaCare Corp., was the surviving merger entity.
On December 27, 2004, Ronald Kelly, a former director, agreed to seek transfer to Pharma Tech Solutions, Inc. of a Wholesale Drug Distribution License issued by the State of Illinois and jointly governed by regulators from the State of Illinois, the U. S. Drug Enforcement Agency and the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Also, Mr. Kelly agreed to seek transfer of a reciprocal drug distribution license issued by the State of Indiana, a client list and know-how in the form of written (published) drug distribution policies and procedures applicable to independent prescription drug and diagnostic distributors. Subsequently PTSI and our other subsidiary, PDA Services, Inc., have applied for and received additional prescription drug distribution licenses in the sates of New Jersey and North Dakota. We are in the process of establishing distribution centers in those states.
28
We have not assigned a value to the prescription drug distribution licenses. Licenses of this nature are tightly regulated and allocated by state and federal authorities and are often transferred as part of asset sales and/or sales of client lists. We have placed no value for the client list and know-how also donated.
Government approval and effect on us
Medical Applications
Recent government and industry legislation and rulemaking, especially the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 ("HIPAA"), and industry groups such as the Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations ("JCAHO"), require the use of standard transactions, standard identifiers, security and other standards and requirements for the transmission of certain electronic health information. New national standards and procedures under HIPAA include the "Standards for Electronic Transactions and Code Sets" (the "Transaction Standards"); the "Security Standards" (the "Security Standards"); and "Standards for Privacy of Individually Identifiable Health Information" (the "Privacy Standards"). The Transaction Standards require the use of specified data coding, formatting and content in all specified "Health Care Transactions" conducted electronically. However, because all HIPAA Standards are subject to change or interpretation and because certain other HIPAA Standards, not discussed above, are not yet published, we cannot predict the future impact of HIPAA on our business and operations. Additionally, certain state laws are not pre-empted by the HIPAA Standards and may impose independent obligations upon our customers or us.
Failure to comply with HIPAA, as well as other government organizations, may have a material adverse effect on our business. Government regulation of healthcare and healthcare information technology, are in a period of ongoing change and uncertainty and creates risks and challenges with respect to our compliance efforts and our business strategies. The healthcare industry is highly regulated and is subject to changing political, regulatory and other influences. Federal and state legislatures and agencies periodically consider programs to reform or revise the United States healthcare system. These programs may contain proposals to increase governmental involvement in healthcare or otherwise change the environment in which healthcare industry participants operate. Particularly, compliance with HIPAA and related regulations are causing the healthcare industry to incur substantial cost to change its procedures. Healthcare industry participants may respond by reducing their investments or postponing investment decisions, including investments in our products and services. Although we expect these regulations to have the beneficial effect of spurring adoption of our software products, we cannot predict with any certainty what impact, if any, these and future healthcare reforms might have on our business. Existing laws and regulations also could create liability, cause us to incur additional cost or restrict our operations.
Specific risks include, but are not limited to, risks relating to:
Electronic Prescribing. The use of our software by physicians to perform a variety of functions, including electronic prescribing, electronic routing of prescriptions to pharmacies and dispensing, is governed by state and federal law. States have differing prescription format requirements, which we have programmed into our software. Many existing laws and regulations, when enacted, did not anticipate methods of e-commerce now being developed. While federal law and the laws of many states permit the electronic transmission of prescription orders, the laws of several states neither specifically permit nor specifically prohibit the practice. Given the rapid growth of electronic transactions in healthcare, and particularly the growth of the Internet, we expect the remaining states to directly address these areas with regulation in the near future. It is possible that aspects of our MD@Hand software tools could become subject to government regulation. Compliance with these regulations could be burdensome, time-consuming and expensive. We also could become subject to future legislation and regulations concerning the development and marketing of healthcare software systems. These could increase the cost and time necessary to market new services and could affect us in other respects not presently foreseeable. We cannot predict the effect of possible future legislation and regulation; and,
Medical Devices. The United States Food and Drug Administration (the "FDA") has promulgated a draft policy for the regulation of computer software products as medical devices under the 1976 Medical Device Amendments to the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act. To the extent that computer software is a medical device under the policy, we, as a manufacturer of such products, could be required, depending on the product, to:
29
Depending on the intended use of a device, the FDA could require us to obtain extensive data from clinical studies to demonstrate safety or effectiveness, or substantial equivalence. If the FDA requires this data, we would be required to obtain approval of an investigational device exemption before undertaking clinical trials. Clinical trials can take extended periods of time to complete. We cannot provide assurances that the FDA will approve or clear a device after the completion of such trials. In addition, these products would be subject to the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act's general controls, including those relating to good manufacturing practices and adverse experience reporting. Although it is not possible to anticipate the final form of the FDA's policy with regard to computer software, we expect that the FDA is likely to become increasingly active in regulating computer software intended for use in healthcare settings.
Anti-Kickback Regulation. As a distributor of prescription drugs along the distribution chain that ultimately supply physicians, we are subject to the federal anti-kickback statute, which applies to Medicare, Medicaid and other state and federal programs. The statute prohibits the solicitation, offer, payment or receipt of remuneration in return for referrals or the purchase, or in return for recommending or arranging for the referral or purchase, of goods, including drugs, covered by the programs.
Licensure and Prescription Drug Distribution. As a distributor of drugs, we are subject to regulation by and licensure with the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), the Drug Enforcement Agency (DEA) and various state agencies that regulate wholesalers or distributors. We are subject to periodic inspections of our facilities by regulatory authorities, and adherence to policies and procedures for compliance with applicable legal requirements.
Currently, we do not bear any costs or any effects regarding compliance with environmental laws (federal, state, and local).
Research and Development Expenditures
instaCare acquired much of its software technology and intellectual properties a result of its merger with Medicius, Inc. in 2002, and has expensed all of the on-going development of those technologies and properties. Additional software research and development has subsequently occurred as part of instaCare's development of its ResidenceWare software systems. From inception and through March 31, 2005, instaCare's software research and development cost is $308,711.
Employees
As of the date of the filing of this registration statement, instaCare has a total of nine (9) part time or contract services employees and nine (9) full staff employees inclusive of five part time and five full staff employees in its principal executive California offices. In addition we employ one full-time employee in North Dakota, one full-time employee in New York, one part-time employee is New Jersey, one full-time employee and one part-time employee based in Florida. In addition, subsequent to our acquisition of CareGeneration, Inc. by instaCare's Pharma Tech Solutions, Inc. subsidiary, there is one additional full-time personnel based in Scottsdale, AZ and two part-time personnel in Carthage, IL. Management foresees the immediate hiring of additional employees over the next twelve months, as we generate sufficient revenues, in management's opinion, to support hiring additional staff. No employees are covered by labor agreements or employment contracts, except for our contract laborers who we hire under contract but are nonetheless at-will. Management believes our relations with our employees are good.
Reports to Security Holders
We are not required to deliver an annual report to security holders, and will not voluntarily send an annual report. However, we are a reporting company and file reports, proxy and information statements, with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The public may read and copy any materials you file with the SEC at the SEC's Public Reference Room at 450 Fifth Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20549. The public may obtain information on the operation of the Public Reference Room by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. The SEC maintains an Internet site that contains reports, proxy and information statements, and other information regarding issuers that file electronically with the SEC and state the address of that site (http://www.sec.gov). We have a website at http://www.instacare.net., which provides a description of our services and products.
30
Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Overview
Due to the deficit we have accumulated deficit of $(10,223,372) since our inception on July 6, 2000 through the period ended December 31, 2004, and with insufficient revenue to support existing operations; our auditors have issued a going concern opinion.
Recently, as discussed below, we have entered into several new business ventures, which have required the company to enter the capital markets to raise capital or to pay for expert services with our stock, so that we might continue. Because we believe we must increase our customer base for our point of care software, and indigent patient care pharmaceutical fulfillment and prescriptions processing system as well as our new ResidenceWare and SatLink product lines so as to continually to increase revenues, we aggressively implemented and are successfully executing our business and marketing strategy by retaining consultants and advisors. As in the past, we have funded these new ventures, and their relating operations by cash provided by financing activities for stock as well as paid the consultants and corporations assisting us with negotiations, marketing, to include customer introductions, primarily through the offerings of our common stock., both common and preferred, options and warrants; thus conserving our capital. Initial effects of these transactions have placed a substantial burden to the overall current value of our common stock, even to the detriment to the smaller block shareholders. However, we believe these transactions will have a long term benefit for all shareholders. We have substantially increased our capital for operations, and subsequent to recent acquisitions and introductions of our new product lines, our revenues have increased substantially.
We will continue, if necessary, to utilize our stock in this manor until fully profitable. We believe our aggressive stock-based compensation throughout 2004 and through 2005 for the services of outside consultants, a corporate strategic planning firms and others who agreed to provide their professional services in exchange for stock, not cash, will benefit us Retaining these individuals and groups who provide capital in exchange for our stock in lieu of cash is a necessity for us achieving market acceptance for our new or newly integrated products and services; for each will require substantial expenditure of significant funds to create awareness and demand by participants in their respective industries. The deployment of new or newly integrated products and services will require the use of our financial and other resources for training our existing sales and customer service personnel and for hiring and training additional salespersons and customer service personnel.
So although InstaCare is still considered a going concern, we have increased revenues in 2005, as evidenced in our 10QSB for the period ended March 31, 2005. We anticipate that our operating cash flow, coupled with the funds raised from financing will be sufficient to meet our operating expenses for the next 12 months. During our normal course of business, we will, however, experience net negative cash flows from operations throughout 2005, at a minimum.
On June 10, 2005 our Board of Directors removed Ronald R. Kelly as a director as a result of certain transactions and other actions that may have lead to a breach of Mr. Kelly's fiduciary duties as a member of our Board of Directors. Mr. Kelly did not serve on any committee of our Board of Directors at the time of his removal. Further, we engaged special counsel to assist management in investigating the matters surrounding Mr. Kelly's removal and on July 6, 2004 instaCare brought suit in Federal Court against Mr. Kelly and others. On June 16, 2005, we received a letter, dated June 14, 2005, from Mr. Kelly's counsel wherein Mr. Kelly advised us of his resignation as a member of our Board of Directors effective June 1, 2005.
In the summer of 2003, we began discussions for a possible acquisition of MDU Services, Inc. (MDU), a Texas based company that was in several businesses, but of particular interest was MDU's business of providing kiosk-style access to the Internet at hotels and apartment buildings. Envisioning a more robust line of Internet connectivity products for the lodging and apartment management marketplaces, we made an initial offer to acquire MDU in the late fall of 2003. This acquisition has never progressed past the Due Diligence phase, even after we revised our offer in February 2004. Given the time that has passed and the lack of materials provided by MDU for our review, it is questionable whether this acquisition will close, although there are no penalties associated with a delayed closure. We remain interested in MDU's businesses.
31
Results of Operations for period ended March 31, 2005.
instaCare incurred net losses of $1,489,909 for the three months ended March 31, 2005. These results include the extraordinary costs incurred through our recent acquisition, However, this performance indicates that instaCare's continuation, is still dependent upon our ability to obtain adequate financing. If instaCare were unable to obtain adequate financing necessary to continue our operations, advance our plan of operations, increase our sales, increase our inventory and working capital, we would be substantially limited. If instaCare were unable to properly fund our plan of operations, our continuation would be jeopardized. Management's plan to overcome our financial difficulties consists of raising additional capital and obtaining revenues from the acquired assets of the CareGeneration, Inc. businesses. At this point, instaCare has no definite plans to return to the capital markets.
The participation necessary to launch our integrated system will be accomplished through the costs of sale and marketing that are estimated to be 60% of revenue.
For the three months ended |
|||
March 31, |
|||
Statement of operations data: |
2005 |
2004 |
|
Gross profit |
$ 196,649 |
$ 55,392 |
|
Expenses: |
|||
General & administrative expenses |
174,936 |
59,082 |
|
Payroll expense |
256,869 |
80,540 |
|
Professional fees |
278,618 |
238,530 |
|
Stock-based compensation - related party |
115,290 |
- |
|
Stock-based compensation - consulting |
346,380 |
485,119 |
|
Software development |
- |
69,641 |
|
Hardware costs |
10,075 |
- |
|
Impairment loss on operating assets |
- |
111,473 |
|
Depreciation |
13,138 |
33,315 |
|
Other total income (expenses): |
(486,251) |
(734,442) |
|
Net (loss) |
$ (1,484,909) |
$ (1,756,750) |
|
Net (loss) per share - basic and fully diluted |
$ (0.00) |
$ (0.01) |
The following is an itemization of our results of operations for the three-month period ended March 31, 2005 in comparison to our results of operations for the period ended March 31, 2004.
NET REVENUE. Net revenue (revenue minus cost of sales) for the three-month period ended March 31, 2005 was $196,649 as compared to net revenue of $55,392 for the three-month period ended March 31, 2004. As we emerge from the development stage, we have begun to generate more significant revenue. We cannot guarantee with certainty when we will begin to generate revenue sufficient enough to fund ongoing operations. Our future revenues will be reliant on the acceptance of our software systems, communication tools and suite of software applications.
EXPENSES
GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES. Our general and administrative expenses relate to the operation and leasing costs of our corporate office. General and administrative expenses for the three-month period ended March 31, 2005 were $174,936 compared to $59,082 for the three-month period ended March 31, 2004. We anticipate purchases of equipment and other office related supplies in conjunction with the generation of revenues from business operations.
32
PAYROLL EXPENSE. Our payroll expense consists primarily of management and employee salaries. Payroll expense for the three-month period ended March 31, 2005 was $256,869 compared to Payroll expense of $80,540 for the three-month period ended March 31, 2004. A management team has been put in place to oversee the launch of our software systems, communication tools and suite of software applications. Management is focused on controlling payroll expenses until such time as revenues are generated sufficient to increase the salary paid to our executives. Payroll expense increased due to the addition of several new employees in 2004.
PROFESSIONAL FEES. Our professional fees include fees paid to our accountants and attorneys. Our professional fees for the three-month period ended March 31, 2005 were $278,618 compared to professional fees of $238,530 for the three-month period ended March 31, 2004. As we have contracts with the professionals that provide support services for instaCare, our professional fees remain constant.
STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION. Our stock-based compensation for the three-month period ended March 31, 2005 was $346,380 compared to stock-based compensation of $485,119 for the three-month period ended March 31, 2004. In an effort to conserve our cash resources during fiscal 2003, 2004 and into fiscal 2005, we retained the services of outside consultants, a corporate strategic planning firm and a merchant-banking firm who agreed to provide their professional services for instaCare stock and stock options in lieu of cash. We typically retain these consultants for a period of either 90 days or 180 days duration.
SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT. Our software development expense for the three-month period ended March 31, 2005 was $-0- compared to software development expense of $69,641 for the three-month period ended March 31, 2004. We have maintained our investment in the development of our software as management continues to focus on integrating our software systems, communication tools and suite of software applications with those of our partners.
HARDWARE COSTS. Our hardware costs represent the cost of goods category for our PDA based Residenceware products associated with the purchase and installation of computer server hardware at our hotel/motel customer sites. Our hardware costs for the three-month period ended March 31, 2005 were $10,075 as compared to hardware costs of $0 for the three-month period ended March 31, 2004.
IMPAIRMENT LOSS ON OPERATING ASSETS. Our impairment loss on operating assets expense for the three-month period ended March 31, 2004 was $111,473. instaCare incurred no such expense for the three-month period ended March 31, 2005.
DEPRECIATION. Our depreciation expense was $13,138 for the three-month period ended March 31, 2005 compared to $36,377 for the three-month period ended March 31, 2004. This represents depreciation on the assets of instaCare and has decreased due to the asset impairment recognized as of December 31, 2004.
TOTAL OPERATING EXPENSES. Total operating expenses for the three-month period ended March 31, 2005 were $1,195,306 compared to $1,077,700 for the three-month period ended March 31, 2004. The increase in total operating expenses was mainly a result of additional overhead costs required to support the commencement of significant operations.
Note payable
Pinnacle Investment Partners, LP Promissory Note
On March 24, 2004, instaCare was loaned $700,000 from Pinnacle Investment Partners, LP (Pinnacle). The Secured Convertible Promissory Note bears interest at the rate of 12% per annum, initially matured on September 25, 2004, but was extended for an additional six months at the option of instaCare, and is secured by 14,000,000 shares ofour $0.001 par value common stock. Pinnacle may, at its option, at any time or from time to time, elect to convert some or all of the then-outstanding principal amount of the Note into shares of instaCare's $0.001 par value common stock at a conversion price of $0.08 per share, unless such conversion would result in Pinnacle being deemed the "beneficial owner," within the meaning of Rule 13d-3 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, of 4.99% or more of the then outstanding Common Shares of instaCare. In the event instaCare fails to pay any installment or principal or interest when due, the interest rate will then accrue at a rate of 24% per annum on the unpaid balance until the payment default is cured.
33
On February 10, 2005, instaCare entered into a "Note Extension Agreement" with Pinnacle Partners, LP. The amended Agreement will automatically increase the principal balance of the original secured promissory note dated March 24, 2004 of $700,000 to $1,100,000 and the maturity date will automatically be extended to April 26, 2006. Pursuant to the Agreement, instaCare has issued and additional 83,000,000 shares of its $0.001 par value common stock as collateral for the additional principal of $400,000. In addition, instaCare has issued 13,000,000 shares of its common stock as a renewal fee to Pinnacle Partners and CJR, Capital, LLC, its designee. InstaCare has recorded a financing expense in the amount of $227,500, the fair market value of the underlying shares.
InstaCare recorded interest expense totaling $48,699 and $22,804 during the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004. InstaCare also recorded financing costs totaling $441,083 during the three months ended March 31, 2005.
Net Income (Loss)
We had net losses of $1,484,909 for the three months ending March 31, 2005. This loss was due in large part to stock-based compensation for consulting fees and other professional fees.
Past and Future Projected Budget Expenses and Projected Milestones
Through March 31, 2005 instaCare spent the following (tables are approximate):
Fees to Initiate Loan from Pinnacle Inv. |
$ 60,000 |
|
Fees for Mercater funds investment |
$ 115,000 |
|
Consulting Agreement (marketing) |
$ 50,000 |
|
Cash consumed for CareGen acquisition |
$ 110,850 |
|
Prescription Drug Inventory |
$ 266,700 |
|
General and Administrative |
$ 36,000 |
|
Legal and Contracts |
$ 10,000 |
|
$ 648,550 |
Our forecasted use of funds through March 31, 2006:
Use of Funds |
Expenditure |
|
Anticipated Licensing and physical plant for of Retail Pharmacy |
$ 150,000 |
|
General and Administrative |
$ 150,000 |
|
Sales and Marketing Retail Pharmacy |
$ 275,000 |
|
Technology Implementation (MD@Hand) |
$ 250,000 |
|
Prescription Drug Inventory |
$ 275,000 |
|
Education/Field Training |
$ 120,000 |
|
Sales and Marketing Wholesale Drug Line |
$ 225,000 |
|
Cash anticipated CareGen acquisition |
$ 95,000 |
|
$1,540,000 |
34
Our anticipated milestones through March 31, 2006:
Activity | Anticipated Date | |
Close Acquisition of CareGeneration, Inc. |
March 2005 |
|
File for Retail Pharmacy license (AZ) |
April 2005 |
|
File for additional wholesale license (NJ) |
May 2005 |
|
Receive Retail license |
June 2005 |
|
Receive additional wholesale license |
June 2005 |
|
Secure supplier agreements (retail pharmacy) |
June 2005 |
|
Secure mail order pharmacy space, build inventory |
July 2005 |
|
Add sales and marketing staff |
August 2005 |
|
Begin marketing HUD pilot |
October 2005 |
|
Initiate marketing to Medicaid clinics |
January 2006 |
Internal and External Sources of Liquidity
M and E Equities, LLC Renegotiated Note
Based on terms negotiated on March 4, 2002, and after a further documentation process that was completed on April 23, 2003, Medicius, Inc. our merger partner in our June 2002 merger was loaned $475,000 from M and E Equities, LLC (M&E). A condition of the loan stipulated that Medicius, Inc. complete its merger with us and become a fully reporting public company. As of December 31, 2003, after partial payment of interest and principal and a settlement of a legal dispute that arose over this note and other issues, the remaining value of the note and accrued interest was $522,527. On March 2, 2004, we renegotiated our debt with M&E. the terms of the agreement are stipulated as follows:
The February 2005 investment by Mercator Momentum Fund, LP and Monarch Pointe Fund, Ltd. and the additional investment by Pinnacle Investment Partners, LP raised a total of $2,400,000. These funds were raised to facilitate our acquisition of CareGeneration, Inc., which was accomplished on February 25, 2005, and the investment required to plan, acquire and market the anticipated "closed door" internet pharmacy. We believe our cash and cash equivalents of $1,849,198 will be sufficient to fund ongoing fiscal 2005 and 2006 operations and provide for our working capital needs. Our current ratio as of March 31, 2005 was 1.92 given current assets of $2,774,900 and current liabilities of 1,446,883. Current ratio is calculated by dividing current assets by current liabilities. This ratio relates to our ability to pay short-term debt as it becomes due. Our ability to continue as a going concern is contingent upon our ability to achieve and maintain profitable operations. Revenues generated over and above expenses will be used for further development of our services, to provide financing for marketing and promotion, to secure additional customers, equipment and personnel, and for other working capital purposes.
35
Net cash used by operating activities during the three-month period ended March 31, 2005 was $938,048, which was primarily due to the net loss of $1,499,909 offset by shares issued for stock-based compensation of $896,530. This compares to net cash used by operating activities during the three-month period ended March 31, 2004 of $249,760, which was primarily due to the net loss of $1,756,750 offset by shares issued for various purposes totaling $1,071,096.
Net cash provided by investing activities during the three-month period ended March 31, 2005 and 2004 was $0. As cash flow allows, we may enter into investing activities on a case-by-case basis should management believe it prudent to do so.
Net cash provided by financing activities during the three-month period ended March 31, 2005 was $2,757,973 comprised of a reduction of $11,027 as payments made on an note payable to a shareholder, $400,000 in proceeds from long-term debt, a revolving line of credit in the amount of $215,950, the issuance of preferred series "C" stock in the amount of $2,000,000 and $153,050 received from the issuance of common stock. This compares to net cash provided by financing activities during the three-month period ended March 31, 2004 of $1,005,734 comprised of $5,000 in convertible notes payable to a related party, $550,000 in proceeds from long-term debts, $35,334 in proceeds from note payable to shareholder and $425,400 received from the issuance of common stock.
To date, we have financed our cash flow requirements through an issuance of common stock and through the issuance of notes. During our normal course of business, we will experience net negative cash flows from operations, pending receipt of revenues. Further, we may be required to obtain financing to fund operations through additional common stock offerings and bank borrowings, to the extent available, or to obtain additional financing to the extent necessary to augment our available working capital.
Critical Accounting Policy and Estimates
Our Management's Discussion and Analysis or Plan of Operation section discusses our financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The preparation of these financial statements requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period.
On an on-going basis, management evaluates its estimates and judgments, including those related to accrued expenses, financing operations, and contingencies and litigation. Management bases its estimates and judgments on historical experience and on various other factors that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying value of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions. The most significant accounting estimates inherent in the preparation of our financial statements include estimates as to the appropriate carrying value of certain assets and liabilities which are not readily apparent from other sources. These accounting policies are described at relevant sections in this discussion and analysis and in the notes to the financial statements included in this registration statement.
Description of Property
instaCare's headquarters and principal facilities are located at 2660 Townsgate Road, Suite 300, Westlake Village, CA 91361. This facility had been rented by Medicius, Inc. prior to our June 2002 merger. The lease terminated in September 2004. This 2300 sq. foot facility is currently rented on a month to month basis without a lease at a rate of $3750.00 per month. We may leave this facility at any time without penalty. In addition the CEO of instaCare, Robert Cox, at no cost to the corporation, is currently providing facilities at his offices in Ft. Salonga, New York, which are available to instaCare upon request and are used by Mr. Cox when he is not traveling. On July 1, 2005 we agreed to a month to month sub-rental for not longer than one year of a warehouse and shipping facility in Colonia, NJ. The rental is $1500.00 per month and offers us an east coast warehouse facility for short term storage of prescription diagnostics purchased on the spot market.
36
Until April 30, 2005 we maintained offices in a 17,500 sq. foot facility for our Pharma Tech Solutions, Inc. operations at 15945 N. 76th St. Scottsdale AZ 85260. Immediately after our acquisition of the former CareGeneration, Inc. we shared this office with Futurecom Global, Inc., a company owned and controlled by Ronald Kelly, a former director of instaCare Corp. and the former controlling shareholder of CareGeneration, Inc.
We have entered into a one-year lease, expiring on December 31, 2005, at 96 S. Madison, Carthage, IL owing to our recent acquisitions of the prescription drug distribution businesses. The facility being rented is a specialty warehouse facility that serves instaCare as a prescription drug storage facility. The rent on this facility is $3750.00 and the lessors are Ronald R. and Linda R. Kelly. Mr. Kelly is a related party and was a former director of instaCare and the controlling shareholder of our recent acquisition CareGeneration, Inc.
We do plan to consolidate our offices in the foreseeable future. This consolidation may require one or more physical moves. If additional facilities are needed, management believes that suitable expansion space is available to meet our future needs at commercially reasonable terms.
Certain Relationships And Related Transactions
In August 2002 we issued 5,725,000 shares of our $0.001 par value common stock to CareDecision.net, Inc. pursuant to its election to convert 750,000 Preferred shares held in Medicius, Inc. CareDecision.net, Inc, was a private corporation that previous to our June 2002 merger with Medicius, Inc., current directors Keith Berman and Robert Jagunich had served in similar positions. This election was made pursuant to the Meger Agreement between Medicius, Inc. and InstaCare.
In November 2002 we issued 875,000 restricted shares of common stock to CareDecision.net, Inc., for purchasing their empower care software and the caredecision.net web domain. CareDecision.net, Inc, was a private corporation that previous to our June 2002 merger with Medicius, Inc., current directors Keith Berman and Robert Jagunich had served at CareDecision.net, inc. in similar positions..
In November 2002 we issued 1,267,963 restricted shares of common stock, to Keith Berman for retiring his Note. Mr. Berman has been Secretary, Chief Financial Officer and a director of the Company since January 2003.
In November 2002, we issued 640,000 restricted shares of common stock to Robert Jagunich for his exercising 640,000 merger warrants at a strike price of $0.05. Mr. Jagunich has been a director of the Company since January 2003.
During the six months ended June 30, 2003, instaCare acquired fully developed software from CareDecision.net, Inc, a private corporation where previous to our June 2002 merger with Medicius, Inc., and where current directors of instaCare Keith Berman and Robert Jagunich had served in similar positions. Pursuant to the agreement, instaCare paid CareDecision.net, Inc. the sum of $181,250 with 2,500,000 shares of our $0.001 par value common stock.
In December 2002 the Board of Directors agreed to issue restricted shares to Robert Cox, Keith Berman and William Lyons, pursuant to a bonus arrangement clause in the June 2002 merger agreement between the company and its merger target Medicius, Inc. These shares were issued in September 2003. Messrs. Berman and Lyons each received 1,250,000 restricted shares and Mr. Cox, the CEO of the company, 1,500,000 restricted shares. At the time of this issuance Mr. Cox was the sole officer and director. In January 2003 Messrs. Berman and Lyons were elected directors.
37
In September 2003 we issued 4,127,093 restricted shares of common stock to Robert Jagunich as compensation for services he had provided in October-December 2002. During the service provision period in 2002 Mr. Jagunich was neither an officer, director or affiliate of the company. Mr. Jagunich was elected as a director in January 2003.
Ronald Kelly served instaCare as a director and consultant. He acted as Vice-President and Director of our subsidiary Pharma Tech Solutions, Inc. In February 2005 our subsidiary Pharma Tech Solutions, Inc. acquired CareGeneration, Inc. a company controlled by Mr. Kelly. Upon the closing of that acquisition, Mr. Kelly was elected as a Director of instaCare and an officer and Director of our subsidiary. Subsequently, on June 10, 2005 he was removed for cause.
Our officers, Mr. Robert Cox and Mr. Keith Berman, serve as the sole officers for each of our two wholly owned subsidiaries: Pharma Tech Solutions, Inc PDA Services, Inc. For each subsidiary, the Mr. Cox and Mr. Berman serve in the following capacities:
Pharma Tech Solutions, Inc. | PDA Services, Inc. |
President - Keith Berman | President - Keith Berman |
Secretary - Robert Cox | Secretary - Robert Cox |
Treasurer - Keith Berman | Treasurer - Keith Berman |
Director - Keith Berman | Director - Keith Berman |
There have been no other actual or proposed transaction that occurred over the past two years to which any person related to the issuer had or is to have a direct or indirect material interest as set forth in item 404 of Regulation S-B of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1933.
Compensation Table
The table below sets forth information concerning compensation for the named executive officer of instaCare for the periods indicated.
SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE
Annual Compensation |
Awards |
Payouts | ||||||
Name & |
Other Annual |
Restricted | Securities | Long-Term | All Other | |||
Principal |
Salary |
Bonus |
Compen - |
Stock | Underlying | Incentive Plan | Compen- | |
Position |
Year |
($) |
($) |
sation ($) |
Award(s) | Options (#) | Payouts ($) | sation ($) |
Robert Cox, | 2004 | 40,450 | ||||||
President | 2003 | 30,000 |
750,000 |
750,000 |
||||
2002 | 30,000 | |||||||
2001 | 100,000 | |||||||
Keith Berman, |
2004 |
16,600 |
||||||
Secretary |
2003 |
16,600 |
625,000 |
625,000 |
||||
Treasurer |
2002 |
16,820 |
||||||
Directors' compensation:
As compensation for their services as members of the board of directors, in 2003 we issued to each independent board member stock options to purchase 20,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $.025 per share. These options are exercisable in full commencing December 19, 2003, and expire December 19, 2008. Outside directors are also paid a fee of $2,500 per quarter or $10,000 per year. The board members who are executives of instaCare received no additional compensation in excess of their management remuneration.
38
instaCare Corp.
(formerly CareDecision Corporation)
March 31, 2005 Financial Statements and Footnotes
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PAGE |
|
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET (UNAUDITED) |
F-1 |
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS (UNAUDITED) |
F-2 |
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (UNAUDITED) |
F-3 to F-4 |
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS |
F-5 to F-9 |
40
instaCare Corp.
(formerly CareDecision Corporation)
Consolidated Balance Sheet
(unaudited)
Assets |
March 31, |
|
2005 |
||
Current assets: |
(RESTATED) |
|
Cash and equivalents | $ |
1,849,198 |
Inventory |
433,587 |
|
Prepaid compensation |
110,670 |
|
Note receivable |
381,445 |
|
Total current assets |
2,774,900 |
|
Fixed assets, net |
170,412 |
|
Other assets: | ||
Loan fees, net of amortization |
87,417 |
|
Total other assets |
87,417 |
|
$ |
3,032,730 |
|
Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity | ||
Current liabilities: | ||
Accounts payable | $ |
78,385 |
Customer deposits |
52,460 |
|
Convertible note payable |
1,100,088 |
|
Revolving line of credit |
215,950 |
|
Total current liabilities |
1,446,883 |
|
Stockholders' equity: | ||
Preferred stock, $0.001 par value, 5,000,000 shares | ||
authorized, 207,526 shares issued and outstanding |
208 |
|
Preferred series "C" stock, $0.001 par value, 20,000 shares | ||
authorized, 20,000 shares issued and outstanding |
20 |
|
Common stock, $0.001 par value, 1,250,000,000 shares | ||
authorized, 447,140,421 shares issued and outstanding |
447,140 |
|
Additional paid-in capital |
12,846,759 |
|
Current year accumulated (deficit) |
(1,484,909) |
|
(Deficit) accumulated during development stage |
(10,223,372) |
|
1,585,846 |
||
$ |
3,032,730 |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
F-1
instaCare Corp.
(formerly CareDecision Corporation)
Consolidated Statements of Operations
(unaudited)
For the three months ended |
||
March 31, |
||
2005 |
2004 |
|
(RESTATED) |
(RESTATED) |
|
Revenue |
$ 2,099,390 |
$ 55,392 |
Cost of sales |
1,902,741 |
- |
Gross profit |
196,649 |
55,392 |
Expenses: | ||
General & administrative expenses |
174,936 |
59,082 |
Payroll expense |
256,869 |
80,540 |
Professional fees |
278,618 |
238,530 |
Stock-based compensation - related party |
115,290 |
- |
Stock-based compensation - consulting |
346,380 |
485,119 |
Software development |
- |
69,641 |
Hardware costs |
10,075 |
- |
Impairment loss on operating assets |
- |
111,473 |
Depreciation |
13,138 |
33,315 |
Total expenses |
1,195,306 |
1,077,700 |
Net operating (loss) |
(998,657) |
(1,022,308) |
Other income (expense): | ||
(Loss) on debt settlement |
- |
(317,136) |
Interest income |
3,531 |
- |
Financing costs |
(441,083) |
(408,255) |
Interest (expenses) |
(48,699) |
(9,051) |
Net (loss) |
(1,484,909) |
(1,756,750) |
Weighted average number of common | ||
shares outstanding - basic and fully diluted |
414,096,161 |
138,419,487 |
Net (loss) per share - basic and fully diluted |
$ (0.00) |
$ (0.01) |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
F-2
instaCare Corp.
(formerly CareDecision Corporation)
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(unaudited)
For the three months ended |
|||||
March 31, |
|||||
2005 |
2004 |
||||
Cash flows from operating activities |
(RESTATED) |
(RESTATED) |
|||
Net (loss) |
$ |
(1,484,909) |
$ |
(1,756,750) |
|
Adjustment to reconcile net (loss) to |
|||||
net cash (used) by operating activities: |
|||||
Shares issued for stock-based compensation |
115,290 |
485,119 |
|||
Shares issued for consulting fees |
346,380 |
162,000 |
|||
Shares issued for financing costs |
227,500 |
423,977 |
|||
Warrants issued for consulting |
107,000 |
- |
|||
Loss on impairment of operating assets |
- |
111,473 |
|||
Loss on debt settlement |
- |
317,136 |
|||
Depreciation |
13,138 |
33,315 |
|||
Loan amortization |
6,583 |
- |
|||
Changes in operating assets/liabilities |
|||||
(Increase) in accounts receivable |
- |
(55,500) |
|||
(Increase) in inventory |
(232,684) |
- |
|||
(Increase) in notes receivable |
(273,945) |
35,000 |
|||
(Increase) in other assets |
(57,657) |
(3,350) |
|||
Increase in customer deposits |
39,960 |
- |
|||
(Decrease) in accounts payable |
(36,316) |
- |
|||
(Decrease) in other liabilities |
|
- |
|
(2,180) |
|
Net cash (used) by operating activities |
(1,229,660) |
(249,760) |
|||
Cash flows from financing activities |
|||||
Payments on note payable - shareholder |
(11,027) |
- |
|||
Convertible notes - related party |
- |
(5,000) |
|||
Proceeds from long-term debt |
400,000 |
550,000 |
|||
Revolving line of credit |
114,350 |
- |
|||
Proceeds from note payable to shareholder |
- |
35,334 |
|||
Issuance of preferred series "C" stock |
2,000,000 |
- |
|||
Issuance of common stock |
|
153,050 |
|
425,400 |
|
Net cash provided by financing activities |
2,656,373 |
1,005,734 |
|||
Net increase in cash |
1,426,713 |
755,974 |
|||
Cash - beginning |
|
422,486 |
|
29,273 |
|
Cash - ending |
$ |
1,849,199 |
$ |
785,247 |
|
Supplemental disclosures: |
|||||
Interest paid |
$ |
48,699 |
$ |
- |
|
Income taxes paid |
$ |
- |
$ |
- |
|
Non-cash transactions: |
|||||
Number of common shares issued for stock-based compensation |
- |
23,115,500 |
|||
Number of warrants issued for interest expense |
|
- |
|
10,000,000 |
|
Number of common shares issued for settlement |
- |
6,510,000 |
|||
Number of stock options issued for services |
|
18,040,000 |
|
- |
|
Number of common shares issued for conversion of debt to equity |
- |
7,350,000 |
|||
Number of preferred shares issued for financing costs |
|
20,000 |
|
207,526 |
|
Number of shares issued for financing |
30,500,000 |
- |
|||
Number of shares issued per merger agreement |
|
52,500,000 |
|
- |
|
Number of stock options issued as compensation |
63,000,000 |
- |
|||
Number of warrants issued for financing |
|
103,500,000 |
|
- |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
F-3
instaCare Corp.
(formerly CareDecision Corporation)
Notes to Restated Financial Statements
Note 1 - Basis of presentation
The consolidated interim financial statements included herein, presented in accordance with United States generally accepted accounting principles and stated in US dollars, have been prepared by the Company, without audit, pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission. Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles have been condensed or omitted pursuant to such rules and regulations, although the Company believes that the disclosures are adequate to make the information presented not misleading.
These statements reflect all adjustments, consisting of normal recurring adjustments, which, in the opinion of management, are necessary for fair presentation of the information contained therein. It is suggested that these consolidated interim financial statements be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements of the Company for the period ended December 31, 2004 and notes thereto included in the Company's Form 10-KSB. The Company follows the same accounting policies in the preparation of consolidated interim reports.
The Company was organized July 6, 2000 (Date of Inception) under the laws of the State of Nevada as Promedicius, Inc. On June 21, 2002, the Company merged with ATR Search Corporation, Inc. and filed amended articles of incorporation changing its name to CareDecision Corporation and subsequently changed its name to instaCare Corp. effective April 14, 2005. The Company was in the development stage through December 31, 2004. The year 2005 will be the first year during which the Company will be considered an operating entity no longer in the development stage.
Correction of an error
The Company has restated its previously issued consolidated financial statements for matters related to the following previously reported items: stockbased compensation, loss on debt settlement and impairment loss. The accompanying financial statements for March 31, 2005 have been restated to reflect the error corrections. The Company's accumulated (deficit) at March 31, 2005, was increased by $116,931 as a result of prior period error corrections. The prior period errors had not effect on net income for the period ending March 31, 2005.
2005 |
2004 |
|||
Accumulated (deficit) at beginning of year, As previously reported |
$ |
(10,223,372) |
$ |
(4,554,644) |
Prior period adjustment - Error in valuation of |
||||
Certain stock based compensation in 2002 and 2003 |
-0- |
(116,931) |
||
Write-down due to impairment of fixed assets |
|
(1,000,770) |
||
Accumulated (deficit) at beginning of period, As restated |
|
(10,223,372) |
|
(5,672,345) |
Net (loss) |
(1,484,909) |
(4,551,027) |
||
Accumulated (deficit) at end of period |
$ |
(11,708,281) |
$ |
(10,223,372) |
Results of operations for the interim periods are not indicative of annual results.
Note 2 - Going concern
The Company has an accumulated deficit as of March 31, 2005, and 2004 of $11,708,281 and $7,429,095, respectively. These conditions raise substantial doubt about the Company's ability to continue as a going concern. The Company needs to obtain additional financing to fund payment of obligations and to provide working capital for operations. Management is seeking additional financing, and is now looking for a merger or acquisition candidate. The Company intends to acquire interests in various business opportunities, which in the opinion of management will provide a profit to the Company. Management believes these efforts will generate sufficient cash flows from future operations to pay the Company's obligations and working capital needs. There is no assurance any of these transactions will occur. The financial statements do not include any adjustments relating to the recoverability and classification of asset carrying amounts or the amount and classification of liabilities that might result should the Company be unable to continue as a going concern.
F-4
instaCare Corp.
(formerly CareDecision Corporation)
Notes to Restated Financial Statements
Note 3 - Business combinations
On November 4, 2004, the Company entered into a definitive "Agreement and Plan of Merger" whereby the Company's wholly owned subsidiary, Pharma Tech, Inc., would acquire all of the outstanding shares of CareGen, Inc., a Nevada corporation, in exchange for 39,750,000 shares of Pharma Tech's $0.001 par value common stock and 42,500,000 shares of the Company's $0.001 par value common stock. On February 5, 2005, the Company consummated the Merger through the exchange of shares. CareGen, Inc. ceased to exist and all assets, certain liabilities and capital accounts were assumed by Pharma Tech, Inc. as the surviving corporation. The Merger was structured as a tax-free exchange pursuant to internal revenue code 368, as amended.
Note 4 - Fixed assets
Depreciation expense totaled $13,138 and $33,315 for the three-month period ended March 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively.
Note 5 - Notes payable
Pinnacle Investment Partners, LP Promissory Note
On March 24, 2004, the Company was loaned $700,000 from Pinnacle Investment Partners, LP (Pinnacle). The Secured Convertible Promissory Note bears interest at the rate of 12% per annum, initially matured on September 25, 2004, but was extended for an additional six months at the option of the Company, and is secured by 14,000,000 shares of the Company's $0.001 par value common stock. Pinnacle may, at its option, at any time or from time to time, elect to convert some or all of the then-outstanding principal amount of the Note into shares of the Company's $0.001 par value common stock at a conversion price of $0.08 per share, unless such conversion would result in Pinnacle being deemed the "beneficial owner," within the meaning of Rule 13d-3 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, of 4.99% or more of the then outstanding Common Shares of the Company. In the event the Company fails to pay any installment or principal or interest when due, the interest rate will then accrue at a rate of 24% per annum on the unpaid balance until the payment default is cured.
On February 10, 2005, the Company entered into a "Note Extension Agreement" with Pinnacle Partners, LP. The amended Agreement will automatically increase the principal balance of the original secured promissory note dated March 24, 2004 of $700,000 to $1,100,000 and the maturity date will automatically be extended to April 26, 2006. Pursuant to the Agreement, the Company has issued and additional 83,000,000 shares of its $0.001 par value common stock as collateral for the additional principal of $400,000. In addition, the Company has issued 13,000,000 shares of its common stock as a renewal fee to Pinnacle Partners and CJR, Capital, LLC, its designee. The Company has recorded a financing expense in the amount of $227,500, the fair market value of the underlying shares.
The Company recorded interest expense totaling $48,699 and $22,804 during the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004. The Company also recorded financing costs totaling $441,083 during the three months ended March 31, 2005.
Note 6 - Commitments
On January 16, 2005, the Company entered into a three month consulting agreement with Steven Bayern, whereby Mr. Bayern agreed to provide business advisory and strategic planning and development services to the Company. As compensation for his services, the Company will issue Mr. Bayern 5,000,000 shares of its $0.001 par value common stock with 1,250,000 vesting 15 days after the execution of agreement. As of March 31, 2005, the Company has expensed $42,500 as consulting fees per the agreement.
On February 1, 2005, the Company entered into a financial consulting agreement with Pylon Management, Inc. expiring on December 31, 2005. Pursuant to the agreement, Pylon Management will be compensated for services in the form of option to purchase up to 18,500,000 shares of the Company's common stock at $0.02 per share. As of March 31, 2005, no options have been granted.
F-5
instaCare Corp.
(formerly CareDecision Corporation)
Notes to Restated Financial Statements
On February 10, 2005, the Company entered into a six-month consulting agreement with Victor Pallante for financial advisory services in exchange for cash in the amount of $50,000 due upon execution of the agreement and 5,000,000 shares of the Company's $0.001 par value common stock to be considered earned over the term of the agreement and issued incrementally. As of March 31, 2005, the Company expensed consulting fees in the amount of $50,000.
Note 7 - Stockholder's equity
The Company is authorized to issue 5,000,000 shares of $0.001 par value preferred stock; of which 750,000 shares are designated as Series A, 500,000 shares are designated as Series B, 20,000 shares are designated as Series C, 750 shares are designated as Series D, and 1,250,000,000 shares of $0.001 par value common stock.
Series "C" convertible preferred stock
Holders of series "C": convertible stock shall not have the right to vote on matters that come before the shareholders. Series "C" convertible preferred stock may be converted, the number of shares into which one share of Series "C" Preferred Stock shall be convertible shall be determined by dividing the Series "C" Purchase price by the existing conversion price which shall be equal to eighty percent of the market price rounded to the nearest thousandth, not to exceed $0.02 per share. Series "C" convertible stock shall rank senior to common stock in the event of liquidation. Holders' of Series "C" convertible stock shall be entitled to a mandatory monthly dividend equal to the share price multiplied by the prime interest rate plus five tenths percent. Series "C" convertible stock shall have a redemptions price of $100 per share, subject to adjustments resulting from stock splits, recapitalization, or share combination.
On February 7, 2005, the Company reached an agreement with Mercator Momentum Fund, LP and Monarch Pointe Fund, Ltd. and Mercator Advisory Group, LLC ("the Purchasers") whereby the Purchasers acquired 20,000 shares of the Company's Series "C" preferred stock for cash in the amount of $2,000,000. Each share of preferred series "C" stock is convertible into shares of the Company's common stock at a rate equal to 80% of the market price prior to conversion. The Company will also issue 100,000,000 warrants to purchase shares of the Company's common stock, 50,000,000 of the warrants having an exercise price of $0.02 and 50,000,000 having an exercise price of $0.03. The value of the warrants, using the Black-Scholes pricing model, was $100,000 and this was recorded as a financing expense.
Preferred stock
The Company issued 207,526 of its $0.001 par value preferred shares for financing costs of $354,800. Each preferred share is convertible into 18 shares of the Company's $0.001 par value common stock.
Common stock
The Company issued 7,350,000 shares of its $0.001 par value common stock to various individuals to convert $522,000 in debt to equity during the year ended December 31, 2004.
The Company issued 6,510,000 shares of its $0.001 par value common stock in order to settle the disputes with investors and agents which arose over the M&E Note, and which allowed the M&E Note to be settled and converted. The value of the shares was $377,136 and is recorded as a loss on debt settlement during the year ended December 31, 2004.
On July 31, 2004, a note holder elected to convert its $50,000 face value loan into shares of the Company's $0.001 par value common stock in full satisfaction of the loan plus accrued interest.
F-6
instaCare Corp.
(formerly CareDecision Corporation)
Notes to Restated Financial Statements
During the year ended December 31, 2004, the Company issued 108,805,500 shares of its $0.001 par value common stock to various individuals and entities for consulting services for the Company's hotel network business, consulting fees associated with the Company's proposed merger with Kelly companies, finders fees to two individuals who introduced the Company to its proposed satellite e-broadcast partner, finders' fees to two individuals who introduced the Company to the Kelly Companies, agent's fees associated with the Company's proposed acquisition of MDU Services, Inc., agent's fees for the introduction and fees associated with the Company's recent agreement with an e-business partner for the hotel product sector, contract fees associated to develop and complete certain software for its hotel sector product and technical expenses incurred associated with the agreement, documentation and initiation fees owing to the Pinnacle Note investment, collectively valued at $1,493,806 and professional fees valued at $556,165. Also as of December 31, 2004, the Company placed in escrow 17,000,000 shares of its $0.001 par value common stock as security for the Pinnacle Note investment.
During the year ended December 31, 2004, the Company issued 6,000,000 shares of its $0.001 par value common stock in connection with loan renewal fees totaling $76,000.
On November 11, 2004, the Company issued 300,000 shares of its $0.001 par value common stock to a director of the Company in exchange for director services valued at $5,400.
On January 13, 2005, the Company issued 7,250,000 shares of its $0.001 par value common stock for services received in connection with financing arrangements valued at $137,750, the fair market value of the underlying shares.
On February 2, 2005, the Company issued 10,790,000 shares of its $0.001 par value common stock in exchange for consulting services valued at $183,430, the fair market value of the underlying shares.
On March 14, 2005, the Company issued 42,500,000 shares of its $0.001 par value common stock pursuant to the "Agreement and Plan of Merger," entered into on November 4, 2005, to the shareholders of CareGen, Inc. (see note 2). The Company recorded and investment in the amount of $42,500. Additionally, the Company issued 10,000,000 shares of common stock to various individuals for cash in the amount of $28,050 and services valued at $151,950, which were expensed as consulting fees as of March 31, 2005.
On March 14, 2005, the Company issued 17,500,000 shares of its $0.001 par value common stock in exchange for services rendered in connection with financial consulting, valued at $190,000, and cash in the amount of $125,000.
There have been no other issuances of preferred or common stock.
Note 8 - Warrants and options
On February 7, 2005, the board of directors approved the issuance of warrants to purchase 100,000,000 shares of the Company's common stock to Mercator LLP in connection with financing arrangements. Such warrants are exercisable over a period of three years at an exercise price of $0.02 for the initial 50,000,000 shares and $0.03 for the remaining 50,000,000 shares. The value of the warrants using the Black-Scholes pricing model was $100,000, which was recorded as financing costs as of March 31, 2005.
On February 7, 2005, the board of directors approved the issuance of warrants to purchase 3,500,000 shares of the Company's common stock to Pylon Management for payment of consulting services. The warrants are exercisable at a price of $0.02 per share and vest over a period of three years. The value of the warrant using the Black-Scholes pricing model was $7,000, which was recorded as a consulting expense at March 31, 2005
The weighted average of the assumptions used to value the warrants in February 2005were: Interest rate-3.50%, Days to expiration-1095, Stock price $0.02,Strike price-$0.02-$0.03, Volatility-0%, Yield-0%.
On February 5, 2005, the Company adopted its "2005 Stock Option Plan" (the "Plan") and granted incentive and nonqualified stock options with rights to purchase 90,000,000 shares of the Company's $0.001 par value common stock. The Company issued 63,000,000 shares of stock pursuant to the plan during the three months ended March 31, 2005.
F-7
instaCare Corp.
(formerly CareDecision Corporation)
Notes to Restated Financial Statements
On February 15, 2005, the Company granted stock options to three of its officers and director, to purchase 63,000,000 shares of $0.001 par value common stock at a strike price of $0.02 per share pursuant to the Company's 2005 Stock Option Plan. The value of the options on the grant date using the Black-Scholes Model is $115,290, which has been recorded as compensation expense on the Statement of Operations as of March 31, 2005.
The following is a summary of activity of outstanding stock options under the 2005 Stock Option Plan:
|
Number Of Shares |
Weighted Average Exercise Price |
Balance, January 1, 2005 |
- |
- |
Options granted |
63,000,000 |
$0.02 |
Options exercised |
- |
- |
Balance, March 31, 2005 |
63,000,000 |
0.02 |
Exercisable, March 31, 2005 |
63,000,000 |
$0.02 |
The following is a summary of information about the 2005 Stock Option Plan options outstanding at March 31, 2005
Shares Underlying Options Outstanding |
Shares Underlying Options Exercisable |
||||
Range of Exercise Prices |
Shares Underlying Options Outstanding |
Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life |
Weighted Average Exercise Price |
Shares Underlying Options Exercisable |
Weighted Average Exercise Price |
$0.002 - 0.002 |
63,000,000 |
3 years |
$.02 |
63,000,000 |
$0.02 |
Pro forma information regarding net income and net income per share, as disclosed in Note 1, has been determined as if the Company had accounted for its non-employee stock-based compensation plans and other stock options under the fair value method of SFAS No. 123. The fair value of each option and warrant grant are estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following weighted-average assumptions used for grants under the fixed option plan:
2005 |
2004 |
||||||
Average risk-free interest rates |
|
3.50 |
% |
|
% | ||
Average expected life (in years) |
3 |
||||||
Volatility |
|
0 |
% |
|
% |
The Black-Scholes option valuation model was developed for use in estimating the fair value of short-term traded options that have no vesting restrictions and are fully transferable. In addition, option valuation models require the input of highly subjective assumptions including expected stock price volatility. Because the Company's employee stock options have characteristics significantly different from those of traded options and because changes in the subjective input assumptions can materially affect the fair value estimate, in management's opinion the existing models do not necessarily provide a reliable single measure of the fair value of its employee stock options.
The weighted average fair value of options granted with exercise prices at the current fair value of the underlying stock during 2005 was approximately $0.02 per option.
F-8
instaCare Corp.
(formerly CareDecision Corporation)
(a Development Stage Company)
December 31, 2004 Financial Statements and Footnotes
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PAGE |
|
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM |
F-1 |
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS |
F-2 |
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS |
F-3 |
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY |
F-4 to F-5 |
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS |
F-6 |
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS |
F-7 to F-22 |
41
Beckstead and Watts, LLP
Certified Public Accountants
2425 W Horizon Ridge Parkway
Henderson, NV 89052
702.257.1984 (tel)
702.362.0540 (fax)
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
We have audited the accompanying balance sheet of CareDecision Corporation (the "Company") (A Development Stage Company), as of December 31, 2004 and 2003, and the related statement of operations, stockholders' equity, and cash flows for the years then ended, and for the period from June 21, 2001 (Date of Inception) to December 31, 2004. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of CareDecision Corporation (A Development Stage Company) as of December 31, 2004 and 2003, and the results of its operations and cash flows for the years then ended, and for the period June 21, 2001 (Date of Inception) to December 31, 2004, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
The accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming the Company will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note 3 to the financial statements, the Company has had limited operations and have not commenced planned principal operations. This raises substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern. Management's plans in regard to these matters are also described in Note 3. The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.
/s/ Beckstead and Watts, LLP
March 30, 2005
F-1
instaCare Corp.
(formerly CareDecision Corporation)
(a Development Stage Company)
Consolidated Balance Sheets
December 31, |
December 31, |
|||
2004 |
2003 |
|||
Assets |
(RESTATED) |
(RESTATED) |
||
Current assets: | ||||
Cash and equivalents | $ |
422,486 |
$ |
29,273 |
Inventory |
200,903 |
- |
||
Notes receivable |
107,500 |
50,000 |
||
Total current assets |
730,889 |
79,273 |
||
Fixed assets, net |
183,551 |
670,288 |
||
914,440 |
749,561 |
|||
Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity | ||||
Current liabilities: | ||||
Accounts payable |
114,702 |
- |
||
Accrued expenses |
304,750 |
- |
||
Customer deposits |
12,500 |
- |
||
Notes payable to officers - short term portion |
- |
82,568 |
||
Note payable |
112,628 |
572,527 |
||
Revolving line of credit |
- |
2,180 |
||
Total current liabilities |
544,580 |
657,275 |
||
Notes payable to officers - long term portion |
- |
14,400 |
||
Long-term debts |
700,088 |
- |
||
1,244,668 |
671,675 |
|||
Stockholders' equity: | ||||
Preferred stock, $0.001 par value, 5,000,000 shares | ||||
authorized, 207,526 shares issued and outstanding |
208 |
- |
||
Common stock, $0.001 par value, 1,250,000,000 shares authorized, | ||||
263,100,421 and 120,244,921shares issued and outstanding | ||||
as of 12/31/04 and 12/31/03, respectively |
263,100 |
120,245 |
||
Additional paid-in capital |
9,629,835 |
5,629,986 |
||
(Deficit) accumulated during development stage |
(10,223,372) |
(5,672,345) |
||
(330,228) |
77,886 |
|||
$ |
914,440 |
$ |
749,561 |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
F-2
instaCare Corp.
(formerly CareDecision Corporation)
(a Development Stage Company)
Consolidated Statements of Operations
July 6, 2000 |
|||||||
For the year ended |
(inception) to |
||||||
December 31, |
December 31, |
2004 |
2003 |
2004 |
||||||||
(RESTATED) |
(RESTATED) |
(RESTATED) |
||||||||
Revenue, net | $ | 182,112 | $ | 75,813 | $ | 259,925 | ||||
Cost of sales | - | - | 22,449 | |||||||
Gross profit | 1,555 | 1,555 | (20,894) | |||||||
Expenses: | ||||||||||
Hardware costs | 66,712 | - | 66,712 | |||||||
Network and infrastructure | 172,915 | - | 172,915 | |||||||
General & administrative expenses | 156,452 | 148,192 | 437,208 | |||||||
Payroll expense | 369,448 | 213,012 | 769,279 | |||||||
Stock-based compensation for employee benefits | 738,600 | - | 738,600 | |||||||
Stock-based compensation for professional fees | - | 62,422 | 234,274 | |||||||
Stock-based compensation for consulting services | 1,326,269 | 1,433,797 | 4,250,581 | |||||||
Stock-based compensation for software development | 21,600 | - | 21,600 | |||||||
Software development | 119,640 | 60,971 | 309,611 | |||||||
Impairment loss on operating assets | 415,078 | - | 1,415,848 | |||||||
Depreciation | 99,910 | 132,587 | 277,807 | |||||||
Total expenses | 3,486,624 | 2,050,981 | 8,813,715 | |||||||
Net operating (loss) | (3,304,512) | (1,975,168) | (8,553,789) | |||||||
Other income (expense): | ||||||||||
Loss on settlement | (377,136) | (77,094) | (482,090) | |||||||
Interest income | 3,527 | 561 | 6,318 | |||||||
Merger expenses | (304,750) | - | (304,750) | |||||||
Financing costs | (481,700) | - | (408,255) | |||||||
Interest expense | (86,456) | (117,107) | (365,810) | |||||||
Net (loss) | $ | (4,551,027) | $ | (2,168,808) | $ | (10,223,372) | ||||
Weighted average number of | ||||||||||
common shares outstanding - basic and fully diluted | 205,914,365 | 94,259,147 | ||||||||
Net (loss) per share - basic and fully diluted | $ | (0.02) | $ | (0.02) | ||||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
F-3
instaCare Corp.
(formerly CareDecision Corporation)
(a Development Stage Company)
Consolidated Statement of Changes of Stockholders' Equity
Preferred Stock |
Common Stock |
Additional |
(Deficit) Accumulated During |
Total |
|||
Shares |
Amount |
Shares |
Amount |
Paid-in Capital |
Development Stage |
Stockholders' Equity |
|
Shares issued for cash |
-0- |
$ -0- |
6,000,000 |
$ 6,000 |
$ 8,695 |
$ -0- |
$ 14,695 |
Net (loss), |
|||||||
July 6, 2000 (inception) to |
|||||||
December 31, 2000 |
|
|
|
|
(9,717) |
(9,917) |
|
Balance, December 31, 2000 |
-0- |
-0- |
6,000,000 |
6,000 |
8,695 |
(9,717) |
4,978 |
Shares issued for services |
500,000 |
500 |
- |
500 |
|||
Shares issued to acquire intellectual property |
750,000 |
750 |
- |
- |
186,750 |
187,500 |
|
Shares issued for consulting services |
250,000 |
250 |
324,750 |
325,000 |
|||
Recapitalization adjustment |
12,430,000 |
12,430 |
(12,430) |
- |
|||
Net (loss), year ended December 31, 2001 |
|
|
|
|
|
(374,134) |
(374,134) |
Balance, December 31, 2001 (RESTATED) |
750,000 |
750 |
19,180,000 |
19,180 |
507,765 |
(383,851) |
143,844 |
Shares issued for consulting services on 3/6/2002 |
1,825,000 |
1,825 |
271,925 |
273,750 |
|||
Shares issued for consulting services on 4/19/2002 |
500,000 |
500 |
42,000 |
42,500 |
|||
Warrants issued for interest expense on 4/23/2002 |
- |
- |
112,800 |
112,800 |
|||
Shares received and cancelled in |
|||||||
satisfaction of obligation on 6/28/2002 |
(1,935,000) |
(1,935) |
(94,815) |
(96,750) |
|||
Shares issued pursuant to merger agreement on 7/9/2002 |
32,968,863 |
32,969 |
1,473,053 |
1,506,022 |
|||
Shares issued for consulting services on 8/1/2002 |
3,000,000 |
3,000 |
147,000 |
150,000 |
|||
Shares issued for Medicius shares on 8/1/2002 |
(750,000) |
(750) |
1,725,000 |
1,725 |
(975) |
- |
|
Shares issued for consulting services on 8/9/2002 |
2,000,000 |
2,000 |
138,000 |
140,000 |
|||
Shares issued for consulting services on 10/2/2002 |
950,000 |
950 |
41,800 |
42,750 |
|||
Shares issued for consulting services on 10/8/2002 |
6,327,737 |
6,328 |
310,059 |
316,387 |
|||
Shares issued for cash on 11/21/2002 |
2,539,574 |
2,540 |
197,460 |
200,000 |
|||
Shares issued for consulting services on 11/21/2002 |
3,515,000 |
3,515 |
253,080 |
256,595 |
|||
Shares issued for cash on 11/21/2002 |
1,267,963 |
1,268 |
59,594 |
60,862 |
|||
Shares issued for consulting services on 12/17/2002 |
1,500,000 |
1,500 |
94,500 |
96,000 |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,925,507) |
(2,925,507) |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
F-4
instaCare Corp.
(formerly CareDecision Corporation)
(a Development Stage Company)
Consolidated Statement of Changes of Stockholders' Equity
Balance, December 31, 2002 (RESTATED) |
- |
- |
75,364,137 |
75,364 |
3,553,247 |
(3,309,358) |
319,253 |
Stock options to acquire 5,500,000 shares | |||||||
of common stock granted on January 21, 2003 |
- |
- |
62,150 |
62,150 |
|||
Shares issued for consulting services on 1/24/2003 |
5,500,000 |
5,500 |
225,500 |
231,000 |
|||
Shares issued for cash on 4/22/03 |
1,538,500 |
1,539 |
48,462 |
50,000 |
|||
Stock options to acquire 6,950,000 shares | |||||||
of common stock granted on July 18, 2003 |
- |
- |
141,085 |
141,085 |
|||
Share dividend issued on 7/21/2003 |
6,469,161 |
6,469 |
(6,469) |
- |
|||
Shares issued for services on 8/18/2003 |
1,800,000 |
1,800 |
123,200 |
125,000 |
|||
Shares issued for consulting services on 8/18/2003 |
2,500,000 |
2,500 |
122,500 |
125,000 |
|||
Shares issued to acquire operating software on 9/12/2003 |
2,500,000 |
2,500 |
178,750 |
181,250 |
|||
Shares issued for services on 9/12/2003 |
14,521,248 |
14,521 |
588,940 |
603,461 |
|||
Shares issued for settlement on 9/12/2003 |
741,875 |
742 |
36,352 |
37,094 |
|||
Shares issued for cash on 9/18/2003 |
2,000,000 |
2,000 |
99,600 |
101,600 |
|||
Shares issued for cash and services on 9/30/2003 |
850,000 |
850 |
41,650 |
42,500 |
|||
Shares issued for services on 9/30/2003 |
1,000,000 |
1,000 |
49,000 |
50,000 |
|||
Shares issued for cash and services on 11/8/2003 |
950,000 |
950 |
46,550 |
47,500 |
|||
Stock options to acquire 7,300,000 shares | |||||||
of common stock granted on November 24, 2003 |
- |
- |
91,980 |
91,980 |
|||
Cancellation of shares on 11/26/2003 |
(1,290,000) |
(1,290) |
1,290 |
- |
|||
Shares issued for services on 11/26/2003 |
1,000,000 |
1,000 |
49,000 |
50,000 |
|||
Sahres issued for services on 11/26/2003 |
2,500,000 |
2,500 |
87,500 |
90,000 |
|||
Shares issued for settlement on 12/3/2003 |
1,000,000 |
1,000 |
39,000 |
40,000 |
|||
Shares issued for cash on 12/17/2003 |
800,000 |
800 |
31,200 |
32,000 |
|||
Shares issued for cash on 12/18/2003 |
500,000 |
500 |
19,500 |
20,000 |
|||
Net (loss), year ended December 31, 2003 |
(2,362,987) |
(2,362,987) |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
F-5
instaCare Corp.
(formerly CareDecision Corporation)
(a Development Stage Company)
Consolidated Statement of Changes of Stockholders' Equity
Balance, December 31, 2003 |
- |
- |
120,244,921 |
120,245 |
5,629,986 |
(5,672,345) |
77,886 |
Shares issued for services on January 9, 2004 |
6,500,000 |
6,500 |
255,000 |
261,500 |
|||
Shares issued for services on January 13, 2004 |
1,550,000 |
1,550 |
65,950 |
67,500 |
|||
Shares issued for services on January 20, 2004 |
7,250,000 |
7,250 |
282,750 |
290,000 |
|||
Shares issued for services on January 23, 2004 |
205,000 |
205 |
9,020 |
9,225 |
|||
Shares issued for services on February 23, 2004 |
2,000,000 |
2,000 |
78,000 |
80,000 |
|||
Shares issued for services on March 3, 2004 |
900,000 |
900 |
35,100 |
36,000 |
|||
Shares issued for debt conversion on March 3, 2004 |
207,526 |
208 |
7,350,000 |
7,350 |
514,650 |
522,208 |
|
Shares issued for dispute settlement on March 10, 2004 |
6,510,000 |
6,510 |
318,990 |
325,500 |
|||
Shares issued for services on March 16, 2004 |
4,660,500 |
4,661 |
181,760 |
186,420 |
|||
Shares issued for services on April 2, 2004 |
1,910,000 |
1,910 |
74,490 |
76,400 |
|||
Shares issued for services on April 13, 2004 |
20,050,000 |
20,050 |
257,950 |
278,000 |
|||
Shares issued for services on April 20, 2004 |
3,300,000 |
3,300 |
128,700 |
132,000 |
|||
Shares issued for services on April 28, 2004 |
8,000,000 |
8,000 |
312,000 |
320,000 |
|||
Shares issued for services on May 7, 2004 |
250,000 |
250 |
9,750 |
10,000 |
|||
Shares issued for services on May 20, 2004 |
750,000 |
750 |
29,250 |
30,000 |
|||
Shares issued for services on May 28, 2004 |
3,000,000 |
3,000 |
- |
3,000 |
|||
Shares issued for cash on June 2, 2004 |
775,000 |
775 |
30,225 |
31,000 |
|||
Shares issued for cash on June 10, 2004 |
3,000,000 |
3,000 |
117,000 |
120,000 |
|||
Stock options issued on August 8, 2004 to acquire 50,000,000 shares |
- |
- |
705,000 |
705,000 |
|||
Shares issued for employee stock option plan on August 13, 2004 |
1,400,000 |
1,400 |
32,200 |
33,600 |
|||
Shares issued for services on August 13, 2004 |
20,000,000 |
20,000 |
130,000 |
150,000 |
|||
Shares issued for services on August 25, 2004 |
750,000 |
750 |
24,750 |
25,500 |
|||
Shares issued for services on September 13, 2004 |
2,850,000 |
2,850 |
43,243 |
46,093 |
|||
Shares issued for debt conversion on September 13, 2004 |
2,000,000 |
2,000 |
48,000 |
50,000 |
|||
Shares issued for services on October 12, 2004 |
14,250,000 |
14,250 |
- |
14,250 |
|||
Shares issued for cash on October 12, 2004 |
9,750,000 |
9,750 |
185,250 |
195,000 |
|||
Shares issued for renewal fees on November 2, 2004 |
4,000,000 |
4,000 |
34,000 |
38,000 |
|||
Shares issued for cash on November 3, 2004 |
3,577,778 |
3,578 |
60,822 |
64,400 |
|||
Shares issued for services on November 3, 2004 |
4,317,222 |
4,317 |
- |
4,317 |
|||
Shares issued for renewal fees on November 29, 2004 |
2,000,000 |
2,000 |
36,000 |
38,000 |
|||
Net (loss), year ended December 31, 2004 |
- |
(4,551,027) |
(4,551,027) |
||||
Balance, December 31, 2004 |
207,526 |
$ 208 |
263,100,421 |
$ 263,100 |
$ 9,629,835 |
$ (10,223,372) |
$ (330,228) |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
F-6
instaCare Corp.
(formerly CareDecision Corporation)
(a Development Stage Company)
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
June 21, 2001 |
|||
For the year ended |
(inception) to |
||
December 31, |
December 31, |
||
2004 |
2003 |
2004 |
|
Cash flows from operating activities | |||
Net (loss) |
$ (4,551,027) |
$ (2,168,808) |
$ (10,223,372) |
Adjustments to reconcile net (loss) to | |||
net cash (used) by operating activities: | |||
Stock-based compensation for employee benefits |
738,600 |
- |
738,600 |
Stock-based compensation for consulting services |
1,326,269 |
1,433,797 |
4,519,544 |
Stock-based compensation for professional fees |
- |
- |
234,274 |
Stock-based compensation for software development |
21,600 |
- |
21,600 |
Stock-based compensation for financing costs |
481,700 |
- |
481,700 |
Warrants issued for interest expense |
- |
- |
112,800 |
Loss on settlement |
377,136 |
77,094 |
482,090 |
Impairment loss on operating assets |
415,078 |
- |
1,415,848 |
Depreciation |
99,910 |
132,587 |
277,807 |
Changes in operating assets and liabilities | |||
Decrease in prepaid interest |
- |
67,680 |
- |
Decrease in loan to shareholder |
- |
9,576 |
- |
(Increase) in inventory |
(200,903) |
- |
(200,903) |
(Increase) in note receivable |
(57,500) |
(44,624) |
(107,500) |
Increase in accrued expenses |
304,750 |
- |
304,750 |
Increase in accrued interest related to long-term debts |
- |
26,422 |
- |
Increase in customer deposits |
12,500 |
- |
12,500 |
(Decrease) in other liabilities |
- |
||
Increase in accounts payable - related party |
114,702 |
- |
114,702 |
Net cash (used) by operating activities |
(917,184) |
(466,276) |
(1,815,560) |
Cash flows from financing activities | |||
Convertible notes - related party |
50,000 |
- |
64,400 |
Proceeds from notes payable to shareholders |
51,084 |
96,968 |
148,053 |
Payments on note payable to shareholders |
(116,175) |
- |
(138,412) |
Revolving line of credit |
- |
2,180 |
- |
Proceeds from long-term debts |
700,088 |
50,000 |
1,043,294 |
Issuance of common stock |
625,400 |
235,300 |
1,120,711 |
Net cash provided by financing activities |
1,310,397 |
384,448 |
2,238,046 |
Net increase in cash |
393,213 |
(81,828) |
422,486 |
Cash - beginning |
29,273 |
111,101 |
- |
Cash - ending |
$422,486 |
$29,273 |
$422,486 |
Supplemental disclosures: | |||
Interest paid |
$76,856 |
$- |
$76,856 |
Income taxes paid |
$- |
$- |
$- |
Non-cash transactions: | |||
Number of shares issued for stock-based compensation |
125,573,900 |
31,159,748 |
176,351,385 |
Number of warrants issued for interest expense |
- |
- |
24,000,000 |
Number of shares issued for settlement |
6,510,000 |
2,280,375 |
8,790,375 |
Number of shares issued to acquire software |
21,600 |
2,500,000 |
2,521,600 |
Number of shares issued as dividend |
- |
6,469,161 |
6,469,161 |
Number of stock options issued as compensation |
1,400,000 |
19,750,000 |
21,150,000 |
Number of shares issued for debt conversion |
9,350,000 |
- |
9,350,000 |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
F-7
instaCare Corp.
(formerly CareDecision Corporation)
(a Development Stage Company)
Notes to Restated Financial Statements
Note 1 - Significant accounting policies and procedures
Organization
The Company was organized July 6, 2000 (Date of Inception) under the laws of the State of Nevada, as Promedicius, Inc. On June 21, 2002, the Company acquired as a wholly-owned subsidiary ATR Search Corporation, and filed amended articles of incorporation changing its name to CareDecision Corporation.
The Company has a limited history of operations, and in accordance with SFAS #7, the Company is considered a development stage company.
Correction of an error
The Company has restated its previously issued consolidated financial statements for matters related to the following previously reported items: stockbased compensation, loss on debt settlement and impairment loss. The accompanying financial statements for March 31, 2005 have been restated to reflect the error corrections. The Company's accumulated (deficit) at March 31, 2005, was increased by $116,931 as a result of prior period error corrections. The prior period errors had not effect on net income for the period ending March 31, 2005.
2005 |
2004 |
|||
Accumulated (deficit) at beginning of year, As previously reported |
$ |
(10,223,372) |
$ |
(4,554,644) |
Prior period adjustment - Error in valuation of |
||||
Certain stock based compensation in 2002 and 2003 |
-0- |
(116,931) |
||
Write-down due to impairment of fixed assets |
|
|
(1,000,770) |
|
Accumulated (deficit) at beginning of period, As restated |
|
(10,223,372) |
|
(5,672,345) |
Net (loss) |
(1,484,909) |
(4,551,027) |
||
Accumulated (deficit) at end of period |
$ |
(11,708,281) |
$ |
(10,223,372) |
Acquisition agreement with Medicius, Inc. (MED)
On June 21, 2001, the Company entered into an agreement with MED whereby the Company acquired as a wholly-owned subsidiary all of the issued and outstanding common stock of MED in exchange for 32,968,863 voting shares of the Company's $0.001 par value common stock, of which the MED shareholders received 22,500,000 shares and CareDecision.net received 10,468,863 shares. An additional 1,500,000 shares of the Company's $0.001 par value common stock was issued to Robert Cox, the former CEO and Chairman of ATR Search Corporation, the Company's discontinued operating entity. The acquisition was accounted for using the purchase method of accounting. The value of the acquired fixed assets on the merger date was $1,704,703.
Cash and cash equivalents
The Company maintains a cash balance in a non-interest-bearing account that currently does not exceed federally insured limits. For the purpose of the statements of cash flows, all highly liquid investments with an original maturity of three months or less are considered to be cash equivalents. There are no cash equivalents as of December 31, 2004 and 2003.
Investments
Investments in companies over which the Company exercises significant influence are accounted for by the equity method whereby the Company includes its proportionate share of earnings and losses of such companies in earnings. Other long-term investments are recorded at cost and are written down to their estimated recoverable amount if there is evidence of a decline in value, which is other than temporary.
F-8
instaCare Corp.
(formerly CareDecision Corporation)
(a Development Stage Company)
Notes to Restated Financial Statements
Inventory
Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market. Cost is determined on a standard cost basis that approximates the first-in, first-out (FIFO) method. Market is determined based on net realizable value. Appropriate consideration is given to obsolescence, excessive levels, deterioration, and other factors in evaluating net realizable value.
Fixed assets
Fixed assets are stated at the lower of cost or estimated net recoverable amount. The cost of property, plant and equipment is depreciated using the straight-line method based on the lesser of the estimated useful lives of the assets or the lease term based on the following life expectancy:
Computer equipment 5 years
Software 5 years
Office furniture and fixtures 7 years
Repairs and maintenance expenditures are charged to operations as incurred. Major improvements and replacements, which extend the useful life of an asset, are capitalized and depreciated over the remaining estimated useful life of the asset. When assets are retired or sold, the costs and related accumulated depreciation and amortization are eliminated and any resulting gain or loss is reflected in operations.
Consolidation policy
The accompanying Consolidated Financial Statements include the accounts of the Company and its majority-owned subsidiary corporations, after elimination of all material intercompany accounts, transactions, and profits. Investments in unconsolidated subsidiaries representing ownership of at least 20% but less than 50%, are accounted for under the equity method. Nonmarketable investments in which the Company has less than 20% ownership and in which it does not have the ability to exercise significant influence over the investee are initially recorded at cost and periodically reviewed for impairment. As of December 31, 2004 and 2003, the Company did not have nonmarketable investments.
Revenue recognition
The Company recognizes revenue on multi-deliverables in compliance with the requirements of EITF 00-21. As previously disclosed, the Company recognizes revenue based on contractual milestones achieved pursuant to terms outlined in each individual contract. Typical milestones would include completion of installation and functionality testing of hardware and/or software in the prescribed environment. Upon effective use, the client is invoiced, and the Company recognizes revenue. In addition, the company's business model assumes several types of follow-on sales, such as paid advertising and additional hardware/software sales. Paid advertising consists of commercial use of the Company's Residence Ware message management system whereby each company advertising on the Residence Ware pay a fee to the Company based on each sale generated through the advertisements. All revenue generated through the on-line adverting is recognized upon receipt of payment per SOP 97-2. Aftermarket sales and services are recognized upon shipment of product or completion of services.
The cost of services, consisting of staff payroll, outside services, equipment rental, communication costs and supplies, is expensed as incurred.
Advertising costs
The Company expenses all costs of advertising as incurred. There was $2,500 and $0 advertising costs included in general and administrative expenses as of December 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively.
F-9
instaCare Corp.
(formerly CareDecision Corporation)
(a Development Stage Company)
Notes to Restated Financial Statements
Use of estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Fair value of financial instruments
Fair value estimates discussed herein are based upon certain market assumptions and pertinent information available to management as of December 31, 2004 and 2003. The respective carrying value of certain on-balance-sheet financial instruments approximated their fair values. These financial instruments include cash and accounts payable. Fair values were assumed to approximate carrying values for cash and payables because they are short term in nature and their carrying amounts approximate fair values or they are payable on demand.
Impairment of long-lived assets
The Company reviews its long-lived assets and intangibles periodically to determine potential impairment by comparing the carrying value of the long-lived assets with the estimated future cash flows expected to result from the use of the assets, including cash flows from disposition. Should the sum of the expected future cash flows be less than the carrying value, the Company would recognize an impairment loss. An impairment loss would be measured by comparing the amount by which the carrying value exceeds the fair value of the long-lived assets and intangibles. The Company recognized impairment losses in the amount of $415,078 and $0 as of December 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively.
Reporting on the costs of start-up activities
Statement of Position 98-5 (SOP 98-5), "Reporting on the Costs of Start-Up Activities," which provides guidance on the financial reporting of start-up costs and organizational costs, requires most costs of start-up activities and organizational costs to be expensed as incurred. SOP 98-5 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 1998. With the adoption of SOP 98-5, there has been little or no effect on the Company's financial statements.
Loss per share
Net loss per share is provided in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 128 (SFAS #128) "Earnings Per Share". Basic loss per share is computed by dividing losses available to common stockholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. There were no securities considered to be dilutive in the computation of earnings (loss) per share.
Comprehensive Income
SFAS No. 130, "Reporting Comprehensive Income", establishes standards for the reporting and display of comprehensive income and its components in the financial statements. The Company had no items of other comprehensive income and therefore has not presented a statement of comprehensive income.
Segment reporting
The Company follows Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 130, "Disclosures About Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information." The Company operates as a single segment and will evaluate additional segment disclosure requirements as it expands its operations.
F-10
instaCare Corp.
(formerly CareDecision Corporation)
(a Development Stage Company)
Notes to Restated Financial Statements
Income taxes
The Company follows Statement of Financial Accounting Standard No. 109, "Accounting for Income Taxes" ("SFAS No. 109") for recording the provision for income taxes. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are computed based upon the difference between the financial statement and income tax basis of assets and liabilities using the enacted marginal tax rate applicable when the related asset or liability is expected to be realized or settled. Deferred income tax expenses or benefits are based on the changes in the asset or liability each period. If available evidence suggests that it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized, a valuation allowance is required to reduce the deferred tax assets to the amount that is more likely than not to be realized. Future changes in such valuation allowance are included in the provision for deferred income taxes in the period of change.
Deferred income taxes may arise from temporary differences resulting from income and expense items reported for financial accounting and tax purposes in different periods. Deferred taxes are classified as current or non-current, depending on the classification of assets and liabilities to which they relate. Deferred taxes arising from temporary differences that are not related to an asset or liability are classified as current or non-current depending on the periods in which the temporary differences are expected to reverse.
Recent pronouncements
In November 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 151, Inventory Costs, an amendment of ARB No. 43, Chapter 4. SFAS No. 151 amends the guidance in ARB No. 43, Chapter 4, Inventory Pricing, to clarify the accounting for abnormal amounts of idle facility expense, freight, handing costs, and spoilage. This statement requires that those items be recognized as current period charges regardless of whether they meet the criterion of "so abnormal" which was the criterion specified in ARB No. 43. In addition, this Statement requires that allocation of fixed production overheads to the cost of production be based on normal capacity of the production facilities. This pronouncement is effective for the Company beginning October 1, 2005. The Company does not believe adopting this new standard will have a significant impact to its financial statements.
In December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 123 (revised 2004). Share-Based Payment, which is a revision of SFAS No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation. SFAS No. 123(R) supersedes APB Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees and amends SFAS No. 95, Statement of Cash Flows. Generally, the approach in SFAS No. 123(R) is similar to the approach described in SFAS No. 123. However, SFAS No. 123(R) requires all share-based payments to employees, including grants of employee stock options, to be recognized in the income statement based on their fair values. Pro forma disclosure is no longer an alternative. The new standard will be effective for the Company in the first interim or annual reporting period beginning after December 15, 2005. The Company expects the adoption of this standard will have a material impact on its financial statements assuming employee stock options are granted in the future.
Stock-Based Compensation
The Company applies Accounting Principles Board ("APB") Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees, and Related Interpretations, in accounting for stock options issued to employees. Under APB No. 25, employee compensation cost is recognized when estimated fair value of the underlying stock on date of the grant exceeds exercise price of the stock option. For stock options and warrants issued to non-employees, the Company applies SFAS No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation, which requires the recognition of compensation cost based upon the fair value of stock options at the grant date using the Black-Scholes option pricing model.
The following table represents the effect on net loss and loss per share if the Company had applied the fair value based method and recognition provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards ("SFAS No. 123"), Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation, to stock-based employee compensation:
F-11
instaCare Corp.
(formerly CareDecision Corporation)
(a Development Stage Company)
Notes to Restated Financial Statements
2004 |
2003 |
||||||
Net (loss), as reported |
$ |
(4,551,027 |
) |
$ |
(2,168,808 |
) | |
Deduct: Total stock-based non-employee compensation expense determined under fair value based methods for all awards, net of related tax effects |
|
(29,960 |
) |
|
(221,450 |
) | |
Pro forma net (loss) |
$ |
(4,580,987 |
) |
$ |
(2,390,258 |
) | |
Net (loss) per common share | |||||||
Basic (loss) per share, as reported |
$ |
(.022 |
) |
$ |
(.02 |
) | |
Basic per share, pro forma |
$ |
(.022 |
) |
$ |
(.025 |
) |
As required, the pro forma disclosures above include options granted during each fiscal year. Consequently, the effects of applying SFAS No. 123 for providing pro forma disclosures may not be representative of the effects on reported net income for future years until all options outstanding are included in the pro forma disclosures.
Year end
The Company has adopted December 31 as its fiscal year end.
Note 2 - Impairment loss on operating assets
The Company determined during the year ending December 31, 2004 that it should write down certain fixed assets acquired with the Medicius, Inc. merger as an impairment loss after comparing the carrying value of the assets with the estimated future cash flows expected to result from the use of the assets. Accordingly, the write down resulted in the realization of a $415,078 impairment loss on operating assets recorded on the Statement of Operations for the year ended December 31, 2004.
Note 3 - Going concern
As shown in the accompanying financial statements, the Company has accumulated net losses from operations totaling $10,223,372, and as of December 31, 2004 and 2003, has had very limited revenues from operations. These factors raise substantial doubt about the Company's ability to continue as a going concern.
The Company's financial statements are prepared using the generally accepted accounting principles applicable to a going concern, which contemplates the realization of assets and liquidation of liabilities in the normal course of business. However, the Company has generated limited revenue from its planned principal operations. In order to obtain the necessary capital, the Company has raised funds via private placement and debt offerings. If the securities and debt offerings do not provide sufficient capital, some of the shareholders of the Company have agreed to provide sufficient funds as a loan over the next twelve-month period. However, the Company is dependent upon its ability to secure equity and/or debt financing, and there are no assurances that the Company will be successful. Without sufficient financing it would be unlikely for the Company to continue as a going concern. The accompanying financial statements do not include any adjustments that might be necessary if the Company is unable to continue as a going concern.
Note 4 - Inventory
Inventory consisted of the following at December 31:
F-12
instaCare Corp.
(formerly CareDecision Corporation)
(a Development Stage Company)
Notes to Restated Financial Statements
2004 |
2003 |
||
Work-in-progress |
$ 58,587 |
$ -0- |
|
Raw materials |
142,316 |
-0- |
|
LIFO inventories |
$200,903 |
$ -0- |
Note 5 - Fixed assets
Fixed assets consists of the following:
December 31, 2004 |
December 31, 2003 |
|
Computer and office equipment |
$ 30,387 |
$ 260,286 |
Software |
232,365 |
583,899 |
262,752 |
844,185 |
|
Less accumulated depreciation |
( 79,202) |
( 173,897) |
Total |
$ 183,550 |
$ 670,288 |
Depreciation expense totaled $99,910 and $132,587 for the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively.
Note 6 - Notes payable and long-term debt
Related party Note
The Company owed two of its officers and directors $112,628 as of December 31, 2004. The short-term note bears interest at 9% per annum and is due on demand.
M and E Equities, LLC Renegotiated Note
Based on terms negotiated on March 4, 2002, and after a further documentation process that was completed on April 23, 2003, Medicius, Inc. the Company's merger partner in its June 2002 merger, was loaned $475,000 from M and E Equities, LLC (M&E). A condition of the loan stipulated that Medicius, Inc. complete its merger with the Company and become a fully reporting public company. As of December 31, 2003, after partial payment of interest and principal and a settlement of a legal dispute that arose over this note and other issued, the remaining value of the note and accrued interest was $522,527. On March 2, 2004, the Company renegotiated its debt with M&E. the terms of the agreement are stipulated as follows:
$320,000 is paid to M&E by Wells & Company, Inc., Lima Capital, Inc., JC Financial and Corporate Architects, Inc. to satisfy a remaining principal amount of $400,000.
M&E agreed to transfer 10,000,000 of the Class A Warrants, formerly issued by Medicius, Inc. with an expiration date of January 5, 2005 to Empyreon.net for $30,000 and 2,000,000 Class A Warrants to Mr. Moshe Mendlowitz for $20,000. The Company incurred financing costs during the year ended December 31, 2004 totaling $405,700, the deemed value of the Warrants on the transfer date based on the Black-Scholes Valuation Model.
The outstanding note balance of $200,526 was recapitalized into 207,526 shares of the Company's $0.001 par value Class A Convertible Preferred Stock and registered in M&E's name. Each share of Class A 2002 Convertible Preferred Stock is convertible into 18 shares (3,717,468 total) of the Company's $0.001 par value common stock at $0.055556 per share. M&E agrees to hold the Preferred Shares for a minimum of one year, pursuant to Rule 144, with no conversions allowed during that period of time. After one year, M&E may convert and sell only 500,000 shares of the Company's $0.001 par value common stock every 60 days as permissible by Rule 144.
F-13
instaCare Corp.
(formerly CareDecision Corporation)
(a Development Stage Company)
Notes to Restated Financial Statements
Pinnacle Investment Partners, LP Promissory Note
On March 24, 2004, the Company was loaned $700,000 from Pinnacle Investment Partners, LP (Pinnacle). The Secured Convertible Promissory Note bears interest at a rate of 12% per annum, matures September 25, 2004, except if extended for an additional six months at the option of the Company, and was secured by 17,000,000 shares of the Company's $0.001 par value common stock. Pinnacle may, at its option, at any time from time to time, elect to convert some or all of the then-outstanding principal of the Note into shares of the Company's $0.001 par value common stock at a conversion price of $0.08 per share, unless such conversion would result in Pinnacle being deemed the "beneficial owner" of 4.99% or more of the then-outstanding Common Shares within the meaning of Rule 13d-3 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. In the event the Company fails to pay any installment or principal or interest when due, the interest rate will then accrue at a rate of 24% per annum on the unpaid balance until the payment default is cured.
Between September 25, 2004 and October 18, 2004, Pinnacle and the Company negotiated an extension to the Pinnacle Note with a separate set of renewal terms. On October 19, 2004, the Pinnacle Note was extended by the parties by virtue of a renewal and settlement agreement through January 24, 2005, and under certain conditions until March 24, 2005. The Company met those conditions by executing the definitive agreement to acquire CareGeneration, Inc. As a condition of renewal the Company was required to provide additional security of 2,000,000 shares of the Company's $0.001 par value common stock, and Pinnacle was provided with a new election to convert some or all of the then-outstanding principal of the Note into shares of the Company's $0.001 par value common stock at a conversion price of $0.045 per share. In addition, should the Company complete a merger or similar transaction prior to January 24, 2005, the Note will automatically be extended through March 24, 2005 with additional security due.
The Company recorded interest expense of $86,456 and $117,107 during the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively.
Note 7 - Income taxes
For the year ended December 31, 2004, the Company incurred net operating losses and accordingly, no provision for income taxes has been recorded. In addition, no benefit for income taxes has been recorded due to the uncertainty of the realization of any tax assets. At December 31, 2004, the Company had approximately $10,223,372 of federal and state net operating losses. The net operating loss carryforwards, if not utilized will begin to expire in 2017.
The components of the Company's deferred tax asset are as follows:
F-14
instaCare Corp.
(formerly CareDecision Corporation)
(a Development Stage Company)
Notes to Restated Financial Statements
As of December 31, |
||
2004 |
||
Deferred tax assets: | ||
Net operating loss carryforwards | $ |
10,223,372 |
Total deferred tax assets |
10,223,372 |
|
Deferred tax liabilities: | ||
Depreciation |
- |
|
Net deferred tax assets before valuation allowance |
10,223,372 |
|
Less: Valuation allowance |
(10,223,372) |
|
Net deferred tax assets | $ |
-0- |
Note 8 - Stockholder's equity
The Company is authorized to issue 5,000,000 shares of $0.001 par value preferred stock and 1,250,000,000 shares of $0.001 par value common stock.
Preferred stock
The Company issued 207,526 shares of its $0.001 par value preferred shares for financing costs of $354,800. Each preferred share is convertible into 18 shares of the Company's $0.001 par value common stock at $1.00 per share.
Common stock
The Company issued a total of 32,968,863 shares of its $0.001 par value common stock pursuant to its merger with Medicius, Inc. whereby each shareholder received three Company shares for every one Medicius, Inc. share held. The Company acquired approximately $1,506,022 in tangible and intangible assets as a result of the merger.
During the year ended December 31, 2002, the Company issued 1,725,000 shares of its $0.001 par value common stock to CareDecision.net, Inc. pursuant to its election to convert 700,000 shares of Medicius, Inc. $0.001 par value preferred stock into the Company's common stock.
During the year ended December 31, 2002, the Company issued 2,539,574 shares of its $0.001 par value common stock for cash totaling $200,000.
During the year ended December 31, 2002, the Company issued 1,267,963 shares of its $0.001 par value common stock to an officer of the Company for cash totaling $40,000.
During the year ended December 31, 2002, the Company issued 19,617,737 shares of its $0.001 par value common stock to various individuals and entities for consulting services valued at $1,405,732, the fair market value of the underlying shares on the dates of issuance.
During the year ended December 31, 2002, the Company cancelled 1,935,000 shares of its $0.001 par value common stock to satisfy an obligation valued at $98,685.
During the year ended December 31, 2003, the Company issued 31,159,748 shares of its $0.001 par value common stock to various individuals and entities for consulting services valued at $769,840, the fair market value of the underlying shares on the dates of issuance.
During the year ended December 31, 2003, the Company issued 5,100,000 shares of its $0.001 par value common stock for cash totaling $235,300.
F-15
instaCare Corp.
(formerly CareDecision Corporation)
(a Development Stage Company)
Notes to Restated Financial Statements
The Company issued 6,469,161 shares of its $0.001 par value common stock as a dividend to its shareholders of record as of June 3, 2003, the grant date. The fair market value of the shares on the grant date was $0.061 per share resulting in compensation to the shareholders totaling $394,619.
During the year ended December 31, 2003, the Company issued 2,500,000 shares of its $0.001 par value common stock to acquire operating software valued at $181,250.
During the year ended December 31, 2003, the Company issued 1,741,875 shares of its $0.001 par value common stock as a dispute settlement valued at $77,094.
The Company issued 7,350,000 shares of its $0.001 par value common stock to various individuals to convert $522,000 in debt to equity during the year ended December 31, 2004.
The Company issued 6,510,000 shares of its $0.001 par value common stock in order to settle the disputes with investors and agents which arose over the M&E Note, and which allowed the M&E Note to be settled and converted. The value of the shares was $377,136 and is recorded as a loss on debt settlement during the year ended December 31, 2004.
On July 31, 2004, a note holder elected to convert its $50,000 face value loan into shares of the Company's $0.001 par value common stock in full satisfaction of the loan plus accrued interest.
During the year ended December 31, 2004, the Company issued 108,805,500 shares of its $0.001 par value common stock to various individuals and entities for consulting services for the Company's hotel network business, consulting fees associated with the Company's proposed merger with Kelly companies, finders fees to two individuals who introduced the Company to its proposed satellite e-broadcast partner, finders' fees to two individuals who introduced the Company to the Kelly Companies, agent's fees associated with the Company's proposed acquisition of MDU Services, Inc., agent's fees for the introduction and fees associated with the company's recent agreement with an e-business partner for the hotel product sector, contract fees associated to develop and complete certain software for its hotel sector product and technical expenses incurred associated with this agreement, documentation and initiation fees owing to the Pinnacle Note investment, collectively valued at $1,537,532 and professional fees valued at $493,737. Also as of December 31, 2004, the Company has placed in escrow 17,000,000 shares of its $0.001 par value common stock as security for the Pinnacle Note investment.
During the year ended December 31, 2004, the Company issued 6,000,000 shares of its $0.001 par value common stock in connection with loan renewal fees totaling $76,000.
Note 9 - Related party transactions
On July 1, 2002, Keith Berman, a beneficial owner and officer of the Company, contributed equipment valued at $27,857. The equipment is recorded as part of the total fixed assets received from the merger with Medicius, Inc.
Medicius, Inc. acquired operating software from CareDecision.net, Inc, a privately owned corporation that completed several transactions with the Company. Pursuant to the agreement, Medicius, Inc. paid CareDecision.net, Inc. the sum of $187,500 with 700,000 shares of its $0.001 par value preferred stock. CareDecision.net, Inc. then elected to convert its preferred shares into 1,725,000 shares of the Company's $0.001 par value common stock. As a result of the merger with Medicius, Inc., two of the beneficial owners of CareDecision.net are now beneficial owners of the Company.
F-16
instaCare Corp.
(formerly CareDecision Corporation)
(a Development Stage Company)
Notes to Restated Financial Statements
The Company received $40,000 from Keith Berman, a beneficial owner of the Company, due on December 31, 2002 and accruing interest at 8% per annum. On December 31, 2002, Mr. Berman elected to convert the note plus interest into 1,267,963 shares of the Company's $0.001 par value common stock. The fair market value of the shares on December 31, 2002 was $0.048 per share resulting in deemed interest expense totaling $20,862.
During the year ended December 31, 2003, the Company acquired fully-developed operating software from CareDecision.net, Inc, a private corporation with several control persons serving in similar positions at the Company. Pursuant to the agreement, the Company paid CareDecision.net, Inc. the sum of $181,250 with 2,500,000 shares of the Company's $0.001 par value common stock.
During the year ended December 31, 2003, the Company received $50,000 from Dr. Thomas Chillemi, a Company shareholder, the note is convertible into 1,000,000 shares of the Company's $0.001 par value common stock and carried with it 1,000,000 warrants exercisable on a one-for-one basis at a strike price at $0.05 per share (Chillemi 2003 Transaction #1). On April 22, 2003 Dr. Chillemi exercised the convertible portion of his note and converted the $50,000 debt into 1,000,000 shares of the Company's $.001 par value common stock. According to the terms of Chilllemi 2003 Transaction #2 (see Note 10 below), Dr. Chillemi agreed to retire the 1,000,000 warrants.
Note 10 - Warrants and stock options
Warrants
During the year ended December 31, 2002, the Company issued 5,848,977 warrants in conjunction with the merger of Medicius, Inc. The warrants are convertible at a strike price of $.04, each warrant is exercisable into one share of the Company's $0.001 par value common stock. The fair value of the warrants has been estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. The weighted average fair value of these warrants was $0.0261. The following assumptions were used in computing the fair value of these warrants: weighted average risk-free interest rate of 5.05%, zero dividend yield, volatility of the Company's common stock of 51% and an expected life of the warrants of two years. The warrants expire on June 27, 2005. Approximately $152,658 was added to the value of the assets acquired from the Medicius, Inc. merger as a result of the warrants. The added value was then written down and recorded as "impairment loss" for the year ended December 31, 2002.
During the year ended December 31, 2002, the Company's merger partner Medicius, Inc. issued a merger formula adjusted 12,000,000 Class A warrants to M and E Equities, Inc. The warrants are convertible at a strike price of $.0667, each Class A warrant exercisable into one share of the Company's $0.001 par value common stock. The warrants expired on January 4, 2005. Upon exercise of each of the Class A warrants, if any, the Company's merger partner Medicius, Inc. is obligated to issue one Class C warrant for each Class A warrant exercised, or a total issuance of up to 24,000,000 merger formula adjusted Class C warrants. The Class C warrants are convertible at a strike price of $.20, each Class C warrant exercisable into one share of the Company's $0.001 par value common stock. The warrants expired on January 4, 2005. As of December 31, 2003 the Company has reserved 36,000,000 of its common stock shares should the warrantholders decide to exercise any of the 12 million Class A warrants before they expire, and any Class C warrants, should the Class A warrants have been exercised before the Class C warrants expire.
No warrants have been exercised through December 31, 2004.
Stock options
On January 1, 2003, the Company adopted its "2003 Stock Option Plan" (the "Plan") and granted incentive and nonqualified stock options with rights to purchase 25,000,000 shares of the Company's $0.001 par value common stock. The Company issued 14,600,000 shares of stock pursuant to the plan during the year ended December 31, 2003.
F-17
instaCare Corp.
(formerly CareDecision Corporation)
(a Development Stage Company)
Notes to Restated Financial Statements
On January 21, 2003, the Company granted stock options to Dr. Thomas Chillemi, a Company shareholder, to purchase 2,000,000 shares of $0.001 par value common stock at a strike price of $0.04 per share pursuant to the Company's 2003 Stock Option Plan. The shares are registered and free-trading via Form S-8. The value of the options on the grant date using the Black-Scholes Model is $22,600, which has been recorded as compensation expense on the Statement of Operations as of December 31, 2003.
On January 21, 2003, the Company granted stock options to Dr. Joseph A. Wolf, a Company shareholder, to purchase 3,500,000 shares of $0.001 par value common stock at a strike price of $0.04 per share pursuant to the Company's 2003 Stock Option Plan. The shares are registered and free-trading via Form S-8. The value of the options on the grant date using the Black-Scholes Model is $39,550, which has been recorded as compensation expense on the Statement of Operations as of December 31, 2003.
On July 18, 2003, the Company entered into a consulting agreement with Dr. Chillemi, a Company shareholder, to perform corporate development services for the Company. As consideration, the Company granted stock options to purchase 3,000,000 shares of $0.001 par value common stock at a strike price of $0.05 per share pursuant to the Company's 2003 Stock Option Plan (Chillemi 2003 Transaction #2). The shares are registered and free-trading via Form S-8. The value of the options on the grant date using the Black-Scholes Model is $60,900, which has been recorded as compensation expense on the Statement of Operations as of December 31, 2003. On October 1, 2003, Dr. Chillemi exercised 1,000,000 of his stock options as consideration for services performed valued at $50,000. On November 1, 2003, Dr. Chillemi exercised an additional 1,000,000 of his stock options as consideration for services performed valued at $50,000.
On July 18, 2003, the Company entered into a consulting agreement with Dr. Wolf, a Company shareholder, to perform medical information technology services for the Company. As consideration, the Company granted stock options to purchase 950,000 shares of $0.001 par value common stock at a strike price of $0.05 per share pursuant to the Company's 2003 Stock Option Plan. The shares are registered and free-trading via Form S-8. The value of the options on the grant date using the Black-Scholes Model is $19,285, which has been recorded as compensation expense on the Statement of Operations as of December 31, 2003. On October 31, 2003, Dr. Wolf exercised all 950,000 of his stock options by rendering $47,500.00 in cash.
On July 18, 2003, the Company entered into various consulting and service agreements with unrelated individuals to perform corporate strategic and developmental services for the Company. As consideration, the Company granted stock options to purchase 3,000,000 shares of $0.001 par value common stock at a strike price of $0.05 per share pursuant to the Company's 2003 Stock Option Plan. The shares are registered and free-trading via Form S-8. The value of the options on the grant date using the Black-Scholes Model is $60,900, which has been recorded as compensation expense on the Statement of Operations as of December 31, 2003.
On November 24, 2003, the Company granted stock options to Dr. Thomas Chillemi, a Company shareholder, to purchase 2,500,000 shares of $0.001 par value common stock at a strike price of $0.04 per share pursuant to the Company's 2003 Stock Option Plan. The shares are registered and free-trading via Form S-8. The value of the options on the grant date using the Black-Scholes Model is $31,500, which has been recorded as compensation expense on the Statement of Operations as of December 31, 2003.
On November 24, 2003, the Company granted stock options to Dr. Joseph A. Wolf, a Company shareholder, to purchase 1,500,000 shares of $0.001 par value common stock at a strike price of $0.04 per share pursuant to the Company's 2003 Stock Option Plan. The shares are registered and free-trading via Form S-8. The value of the options on the grant date using the Black-Scholes Model is $18,900, which has been recorded as compensation expense on the Statement of Operations as of December 31, 2003.
F-18
instaCare Corp.
(formerly CareDecision Corporation)
(a Development Stage Company)
Notes to Restated Financial Statements
On November 24, 2003, the Company entered into various consulting and service agreements with unrelated individuals to perform corporate strategic and developmental services for the Company. As consideration, the Company granted stock options to purchase 3,300,000 shares of $0.001 par value common stock at a strike price of $0.04 per share pursuant to the Company's 2003 Stock Option Plan. The shares are registered and free-trading via Form S-8. The value of the options on the grant date using the Black-Scholes Model is $41,580, which has been recorded as compensation expense on the Statement of Operations as of December 31, 2003.
As of December 31, 2003, outstanding stock options to acquire shares of common stock on a one-for-one basis totaled 5,150,000 at a weighted average exercise price of $.043. As of December 31, 2003, stock options in the Plan remaining to be issued totaled 5,250,000. The Plan stock options are 100% vested from the grant date.
The following is a summary of activity of outstanding stock options under the 2003 Stock Option Plan:
Weighted |
||||||
Average |
||||||
Number |
Exercise |
|||||
Of Shares |
Price |
|||||
Balance, December 31, 2003 |
5,150,000 |
- |
||||
Options granted |
-0- |
$ |
0.043 |
|||
Options exercised |
(-0- |
) |
0.043 |
|||
Balance, December 31, 2004 |
5,150,000 |
0.043 |
||||
Exercisable, December 31, 2004 |
5,150,000 |
$ |
0.043 |
The following is a summary of information about the 2003 Stock Option Plan options outstanding at December 31, 2004
Shares Underlying Options Outstanding |
Shares Underlying |
||||||||||||||
Shares |
Average |
Weighted |
Shares |
Weighted |
|||||||||||
Underlying |
Remaining |
Average |
Underlying |
Average |
|||||||||||
Range of |
Options |
Contractual |
Exercise |
Options |
Exercise |
||||||||||
Exercise Prices |
Outstanding |
Life |
Price |
Exercisable |
Price |
||||||||||
$ |
0.040 - 0.050 |
5,150,000 |
0 years |
$ |
0.043 |
5,150,000 |
$ |
0.043 |
Pro forma information regarding net income and net income per share, as disclosed in Note 1, has been determined as if the Company had accounted for its non-employee stock-based compensation plans and other stock options under the fair value method of SFAS No. 123. The fair value of each option and warrant grant are estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following weighted-average assumptions used for grants under the fixed option plan:
F-19
instaCare Corp.
(formerly CareDecision Corporation)
(a Development Stage Company)
Notes to Restated Financial Statements
2004 |
2003 |
|||||
Average risk-free interest rates |
|
5.05 |
% |
|
5.05 |
% |
Average expected life (in years) |
2 |
2 |
||||
Volatility |
|
51.0 |
% |
|
51.0 |
% |
The Black-Scholes option valuation model was developed for use in estimating the fair value of short-term traded options that have no vesting restrictions and are fully transferable. In addition, option valuation models require the input of highly subjective assumptions including expected stock price volatility. Because the Company's employee stock options have characteristics significantly different from those of traded options and because changes in the subjective input assumptions can materially affect the fair value estimate, in management's opinion the existing models do not necessarily provide a reliable single measure of the fair value of its employee stock options. During 2003, there were no options granted with an exercise price below the fair value of the underlying stock at the grant date.
The weighted average fair value of options granted with exercise prices at the current fair value of the underlying stock during 2004 was approximately $0.043 per option.
On August 5, 2004 the Company adopted its "2004 Employee Stock Option Plan" (the "Plan") and granted incentive and nonqualified stock options with rights to purchase 50,000,000 shares of the Company's $0.001 par value common stock. The Company issued 50,000,000 shares of stock pursuant to the plan during the year ended December 31, 2004.
On August 5, 2004, the Company entered into various consulting and service agreements with unrelated individuals to perform corporate strategic and developmental services for the Company. As consideration, the Company granted stock options to purchase 20,000,000 shares of $0.001 par value common stock at a strike price of $0.024 per share pursuant to the Company's 2004 Stock Option Plan. The shares are registered and free-trading under the Company' 2004 Employee Stock Option plan filed via Form S-8. The value of the options on the grant date using the Black-Scholes Model is $480,000, which has been recorded as compensation expense on the Statement of Operations as of December 31, 2004.
On October 12, 2004, the Company entered into various consulting and service agreements with Dr. Joseph Wolf, Leslie-Michelle Abraham and M. Thais Abraham to perform strategic and developmental services to facilitate the Company's proposed merger with CareGeneration, Inc., among others. As consideration, the Company granted stock options to purchase 24,000,000 shares of $0.001 par value common stock at a strike price of $0.02 per share pursuant to the Company's 2004 Stock Option Plan. The shares are registered and free-trading under the Company' 2004 Employee Stock Option plan filed via Form S-8. The value of the options on the grant date using the Black-Scholes Model is $285,000, which has been recorded as compensation expense on the Statement of Operations as of December 31, 2004.
On October 28, 2004, the Company entered into a second consulting and service agreement with Dr. Joseph Wolf to perform an enterprise value report for the Company's proposed acquisition of CareGeneration, Inc. inclusive of that company's recent receipt of certain prescription drug distribution licenses and other considerations. As consideration, the Company granted stock options to purchase 6,500,000 shares of $0.001 par value common stock at a strike price of $0.018 per share pursuant to the Company's 2004 Stock Option Plan. The shares are registered and free-trading under the Company' 2004 Employee Stock Option plan filed via Form S-8. The value of the options on the grant date using the Black-Scholes Model is $72,310.00, which has been recorded as compensation expense on the Statement of Operations as of December 31, 2004.
The following is a summary of activity of outstanding stock options under the 2004 Stock Option Plan:
F-20
instaCare Corp.
(formerly CareDecision Corporation)
(a Development Stage Company)
Notes to Restated Financial Statements
Weighted |
||||||
Average |
||||||
Number |
Exercise |
|||||
Of Shares |
Price |
|||||
Balance, December 31, 2003 |
- |
- |
||||
Options granted |
50,000,000 |
$ |
0.0214 |
|||
Options exercised |
49,750,000 |
0.0214 |
||||
Balance, December 31, 2004 |
250,000 |
0.0214 |
||||
Exercisable, December 31, 2004 |
250,000 |
$ |
0.0214 |
The following is a summary of information about the 2004 Stock Option Plan options outstanding at December 31, 2004
Shares Underlying Options Outstanding |
Shares Underlying |
||||||||||||||
Shares |
Average |
Weighted |
Shares |
Weighted |
|||||||||||
Underlying |
Remaining |
Average |
Underlying |
Average |
|||||||||||
Range of |
Options |
Contractual |
Exercise |
Options |
Exercise |
||||||||||
Exercise Prices |
Outstanding |
Life |
Price |
Exercisable |
Price |
||||||||||
$ |
0.018 - 0.024 |
250,000 |
0 years |
$ |
.0214 |
250,000 |
$ |
0.0214 |
Pro forma information regarding net income and net income per share, as disclosed in Note 1, has been determined as if the Company had accounted for its non-employee stock-based compensation plans and other stock options under the fair value method of SFAS No. 123. The fair value of each option and warrant grant are estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following weighted-average assumptions used for grants under the fixed option plan:
2004 |
2003 |
|||||
Average risk-free interest rates |
|
5.25 |
% |
|
% | |
Average expected life (in years) |
2 |
|||||
Volatility |
|
57.08 |
% |
|
% |
F-21
instaCare Corp.
(formerly CareDecision Corporation)
(a Development Stage Company)
Notes to Restated Financial Statements
The Black-Scholes option valuation model was developed for use in estimating the fair value of short-term traded options that have no vesting restrictions and are fully transferable. In addition, option valuation models require the input of highly subjective assumptions including expected stock price volatility. Because the Company's employee stock options have characteristics significantly different from those of traded options and because changes in the subjective input assumptions can materially affect the fair value estimate, in management's opinion the existing models do not necessarily provide a reliable single measure of the fair value of its employee stock options. During 2004 and 2003, there were no options granted with an exercise price below the fair value of the underlying stock at the grant date.
The weighted average fair value of options granted with exercise prices at the current fair value of the underlying stock during 2004 was approximately $0.0141 per option.
Note 11 - Commitments and contingencies
Litigations
The Company is subject to various claims and legal proceedings covering a wide range of matters that arise in the ordinary course of its business activities, including product liability claims. Management believes that any liability that may ultimately result from the resolution of these matters will not have a material adverse effect on the financial condition or results of operations of the Company.
Note 12 - Subsequent events
On February 10, 2005, the Company and Pinnacle Investment Partners, LP ("Pinnacle"), entered into a second Note Extension Agreement. The Company had previously issued to Pinnacle a $700,000 Secured (Convertible) Promissory Note bearing interest at the rate of 12% per annum, dated March 24, 2004 which provided for a maturity date of September 24, 2004, convertible into the Company's common stock subject to certain conditions. In a Note Extension Agreement dated September 24, 2004, the Parties amended the Note and the related Pledge and Security Agreement, and under the terms of that particular Note Extension Agreement the maturity date of the Note became January 24, 2004 and upon further performance on the part of the Company a final maturity date of March 24, 2005.
Subject to the terms of this new agreement; on March 24, 2005, Pinnacle agreed to pay to the Company $340,000 and (2) pay to Pinnacle's designee, CJR Capital, LLC, $60,000 towards Pinnacle's due diligence and legal expenses related to this new agreement. This new agreement has the following consequences: (1) the principal amount due under the Note rises automatically increases by $400,000 to $1,100,000; (2) the Maturity Date of the newly revised Note has been extended for a period of 13 months to April 24, 2006; and (3) the conversion price for those shares that underlie the Note was changed to $0.025 from the previous conversion price of $.04.
In addition to the above, the Company also agreed: (1) to deliver to Pinnacle's counsel an additional 83,000,000 shares of the Company's common stock as additional escrow security, (2) issue to Pinnacle's designee, CJR Capital, LLC, 4,000,000 shares of the Company's common stock towards Pinnacle's due diligence and legal expenses related to the revision of the Note; (3) issue to Pinnacle 9,000,000 shares of the Company's common stock as a loan re-initiation fee.
F-22
instaCare Corp.
(formerly CareDecision Corporation)
(a Development Stage Company)
Notes to Restated Financial Statements
On February 7, 2005, the Company reached an agreement with three entities, Mercator Momentum Fund, LP, and Monarch Pointe Fund, Ltd. and Mercator Advisory Group, LLC ("MAG"). Under this agreement, in return for a total investment of $2,000,000 USD from the investing entities, the last portion of which was received on February 22, 2005, the Company agreed to issue and sell to the Purchasers an aggregate of: (a) Twenty Thousand (20,000) shares of a new issue Series C Convertible Preferred Stock, $1,000 per share which shall be convertible into shares of the Company's common stock with the conversion rate pegged at 80% of the market for the Company's common stock prior to any conversion, subject to certain conditions, and (b) One Hundred Million (100,000,000) warrants to acquire up to One Hundred Million (100,000,000) shares of the Company's common stock, 50,000,000 of the warrants having an exercise strike price of $.02 and 50,000,000 of the warrants having an exercise strike price of $.03.
On February 11, 2005, the Company filed a Registration Statement on Form SB-2 with the Securities and Exchange Commission to register the common shares of the Company's common stock that underlie the Pinnacle agreement and the agreement with, Mercator Momentum Fund, LP, and Monarch Pointe Fund, Ltd. and Mercator Advisory Group, LLC.
Mergers and acquisitions
On November 3, 2004, and amended on December 27, 2004, the company entered into a Definitive Agreement that called for a series of transactions to be completed between CareDecision, Pharma Tech Solutions, Inc., the Company's subsidiary and CareGeneration, Inc. the acquisition target, that when accomplished would merge CareGeneration, Inc. into the company's subsidiary Pharma Tech Solutions, Inc. and whereby Pharma Tech Solutions, Inc. would be the surviving entity. The parties concluded the activities surrounding this acquisition on January 27, 2005. The acquisition closed on February 25, 2005. Pursuant to the agreements CareGeneration shareholders will receive 39,375,000 shares of the Subsidiary's common stock, equaling approximately 49% of the outstanding shares of the Subsidiary, and 42,500,000 of the Company's common stock in exchange for all of the shares of the Target common stock and all of the Target preferred stock. In addition, Company at closing will place in escrow up to 100,000,000 common stock shares, which may be paid to CareGeneration stockholders subject to earn-out provisions.
Issuances of Common Stock
The Company has issued 18,040,000 shares of its $0.001 par value common stock to various individuals and entities for cash totaling $292,500 and services valued at $50,600.00 subsequent to December 31, 2004 and through February 24, 2005.
F-23
CareGeneration, Inc.
(a Development Stage Company)
December 31, 2004 Financial Statements and Footnotes
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PAGE |
|
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM |
F-1 |
BALANCE SHEET |
F-2 |
STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS |
F-3 |
STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY |
F-4 |
STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS |
F-5 |
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS |
F-6 to F-10 |
42
Beckstead and Watts, LLP
Certified Public Accountants
2425 W Horizon Ridge Parkway
Henderson, NV 89052
702.257.1984 (tel)
702.362.0540 (fax)
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
We have audited the accompanying balance sheet of CareGeneration, Inc. (the "Company") (A Development Stage Company), as of December 31, 2004, and the related statement of operations, stockholders' equity, and cash flows for the period from February 18, 2004 (Date of Inception) to December 31, 2004. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of CareGeneration, Inc. (A Development Stage Company) as of December 31, 2004, and the results of its operations and cash flows for the period February 18, 2004 (Date of Inception) to December 31, 2004, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
The accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming the Company will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note 3 to the financial statements, the Company has had limited operations and have not commenced planned principal operations. This raises substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern. Management's plans in regard to these matters are also described in Note 3. The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.
/s/ Beckstead and Watts, LLP
March 30, 2005
F-1
CareGeneration, Inc.
Balance Sheet
December 31, |
||
Assets | ||
Current assets: | ||
Cash | $ |
3,467 |
Prepaid compensation |
147,560 |
|
Total current assets |
151,027 |
|
Other assets: | ||
Loan to affiliate |
5,000 |
|
$ |
156,027 |
|
Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity | ||
Current liabilities: | ||
Accounts payable | $ |
- |
Total current liabilities |
- |
|
Stockholders' equity: | ||
Common stock, $0.01 par value, 20,000,000 shares | ||
authorized, 1,000,000 shares issued and outstanding |
10,000 |
|
Additional paid-in capital |
147,560 |
|
Deficit |
(1,533) |
|
156,027 |
||
$ |
156,027 |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
F-2
CareGeneration, Inc.
Statement of Operations
|
February 18, 2004 (Inception) to December 31, 2004 |
|
Revenue |
$ |
- |
Expenses: |
||
General and administrative expenses |
161 |
|
Professional and consulting fees |
|
1,372 |
Total expenses |
|
1,533 |
(Loss) before provision for taxes |
(1,533) |
|
Provision for income taxes |
|
- |
Net (loss) |
$ |
(1,533) |
Weighted average number of |
||
common shares outstanding - basic and fully diluted |
|
1,000,000 |
Net (loss) per share - basic and fully diluted |
$ |
(0.00) |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
F-3
CareGeneration, Inc.
Statement of Stockholders' Equity
Additional |
Total |
||||
Common Stock |
Paid-in |
Stockholders' |
|||
Shares |
Capital |
Deficit |
Equity |
||
February 2004 | |||||
Founders shares issued for cash |
1,000,000 |
$10,000 |
$ 147,560 |
$ - |
$ 157,560 |
and prepaid compensation |
|||||
Net (loss) | |||||
For the year ended December 31, 2004 |
(1,533) |
(1,533) |
|||
Balance, December 31, 2004 |
1,000,000 |
$10,000 |
$ 147,560 |
$ (1,533) |
$ 156,027 |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
F-4
CareGeneration, Inc.
Statement of Cash Flows
February 18, 2004 |
||
Cash flows from operating activities |
||
Net (loss) |
$ |
(1,533) |
Changes to operating assets and liabilities: | ||
Loan to affiliate |
(5,000) |
|
Net cash (used) by operating activities |
(6,533) |
|
Cash flows from financing activities | ||
Issuances of common stock |
10,000 |
|
Net cash provided by financing activities |
10,000 |
|
Net increase in cash |
3,467 |
|
Cash - beginning |
- |
|
Cash - ending |
$ |
3,467 |
Supplemental disclosures: | ||
Interest paid |
$ |
- |
Income taxes paid |
$ |
- |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
F-5
CareGeneration, Inc.
Notes
Note 1 - History and organization of the company
The Company was organized February 18, 2004 (Date of Inception) under the laws of the State of Nevada, as CareGeneration, Inc. The Company is authorized to issue 20,000,000 shares of its $0.01 par value common stock.
Note 2 - Accounting policies and procedures
Use of estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Cash and cash equivalents
The Company maintains a cash balance in a non-interest-bearing account that currently does not exceed federally insured limits. For the purpose of the statements of cash flows, all highly liquid investments with an original maturity of three months or less are considered to be cash equivalents. There were no cash equivalents as of December 31, 2004.
Revenue recognition
The Company recognizes revenue and gains when earned and related costs of sales and expenses when incurred.
Advertising costs
The Company expenses all costs of advertising as incurred. There were no advertising costs included in selling, general and administrative expenses in 2004.
Impairment of long-lived assets
Long-lived assets held and used by the Company are reviewed for possible impairment whenever events or circumstances indicate the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable or is impaired. No such impairments have been identified by management at December 31, 2004.
Impairment of intangible assets
The Company evaluates the recoverability of identifiable intangible assets whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that an intangible asset's carrying amount may not be recoverable. Such circumstances could include, but are not limited to: (1) a significant decrease in the market value of an asset, (2) a significant adverse change in the extent or manner in which an asset is used, or (3) an accumulation of costs significantly in excess of the amount originally expected for the acquisition of an asset. The Company measures the carrying amount of the asset against the estimated undiscounted future cash flows associated with it. Should the sum of the expected future net cash flows be less than the carrying value of the asset being evaluated, an impairment loss would be recognized. The impairment loss would be calculated as the amount by which the carrying value of the asset exceeds its fair value. The fair value is measured based on quoted market prices, if available. If quoted market prices are not available, the estimate of fair value is based on various valuation techniques, including the discounted value of estimated future cash flows. The evaluation of asset impairment requires the Company to make assumptions about future cash flows over the life of the asset being evaluated. These assumptions require significant judgment and actual results may differ from assumed and estimated amounts. During the year ended December 31, 2004, the Company has not recorded an impairment related to its intangible asset (see Note 9).
F-6
CareGeneration, Inc.
Notes
Loss per share
Net loss per share is provided in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 128 (SFAS #128) "Earnings Per Share". Basic loss per share is computed by dividing losses available to common stockholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. The Company had no dilutive common stock equivalents, such as stock options or warrants as of December 31, 2004.
Reporting on the costs of start-up activities
Statement of Position 98-5 (SOP 98-5), "Reporting on the Costs of Start-Up Activities," which provides guidance on the financial reporting of start-up costs and organizational costs, requires most costs of start-up activities and organizational costs to be expensed as incurred. SOP 98-5 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 1998. With the adoption of SOP 98-5, there has been little or no effect on the Company's financial statements.
Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Fair value of financial instruments
Fair value estimates discussed herein are based upon certain market assumptions and pertinent information available to management as of December 31, 2004. The respective carrying value of certain on-balance-sheet financial instruments approximated their fair values. Fair values were assumed to approximate carrying values for cash, accounts payable and notes payable because they are short term in nature and their carrying amounts approximate fair values or they are payable on demand.
Income Taxes
The Company follows Statement of Financial Accounting Standard No. 109, "Accounting for Income Taxes" ("SFAS No. 109") for recording the provision for income taxes. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are computed based upon the difference between the financial statement and income tax basis of assets and liabilities using the enacted marginal tax rate applicable when the related asset or liability is expected to be realized or settled. Deferred income tax expenses or benefits are based on the changes in the asset or liability each period. If available evidence suggests that it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized, a valuation allowance is required to reduce the deferred tax assets to the amount that is more likely than not to be realized. Future changes in such valuation allowance are included in the provision for deferred income taxes in the period of change.
Deferred income taxes may arise from temporary differences resulting from income and expense items reported for financial accounting and tax purposes in different periods. Deferred taxes are classified as current or non-current, depending on the classification of assets and liabilities to which they relate. Deferred taxes arising from temporary differences that are not related to an asset or liability are classified as current or non-current depending on the periods in which the temporary differences are expected to reverse.
Segment reporting
The Company follows Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 130, "Disclosures About Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information". The Company operates as a single segment and will evaluate additional segment disclosure requirements as it expands its operations.
Dividends
The Company has not yet adopted any policy regarding payment of dividends. No dividends have been paid or declared since inception.
F-7
CareGeneration, Inc.
Notes
Recent pronouncements
In November 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 151, Inventory Costs, an amendment of ARB No. 43, Chapter 4. SFAS No. 151 amends the guidance in ARB No. 43, Chapter 4, Inventory Pricing, to clarify the accounting for abnormal amounts of idle facility expense, freight, handing costs, and spoilage. This statement requires that those items be recognized as current period charges regardless of whether they meet the criterion of "so abnormal" which was the criterion specified in ARB No. 43. In addition, this Statement requires that allocation of fixed production overheads to the cost of production be based on normal capacity of the production facilities. This pronouncement is effective for the Company beginning October 1, 2005. The Company does not believe adopting this new standard will have a significant impact to its financial statements.
In December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 123 (revised 2004). Share-Based Payment, which is a revision of SFAS No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation. SFAS No. 123(R) supersedes APB Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees and amends SFAS No. 95, Statement of Cash Flows. Generally, the approach in SFAS No. 123(R) is similar to the approach described in SFAS No. 123. However, SFAS No. 123(R) requires all share-based payments to employees, including grants of employee stock options, to be recognized in the income statement based on their fair values. Pro forma disclosure is no longer an alternative. The new standard will be effective for the Company in the first interim or annual reporting period beginning after December 15, 2005. The Company expects the adoption of this standard will have a material impact on its financial statements assuming employee stock options are granted in the future.
Year end
The Company has adopted December 31 as its fiscal year end.
Note 3 - Going concern
The accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming the Company will continue as a going concern. As shown in the accompanying financial statements, the Company has incurred a net loss of ($1,533) for the period from February 18, 2004 (inception) to December 31, 2004, and had no sales. The future of the Company is dependent upon its ability to obtain financing and upon future profitable operations from the development of its new business opportunities. Management plans to raise funds via debt and/or equity financing in order to maintain operations. The financial statements do not include any adjustments relating to the recoverability and classification of recorded assets, or the amounts of and classification of liabilities that might be necessary in the event the Company cannot continue in existence.
These conditions raise substantial doubt about the Company's ability to continue as a going concern. These financial statements do not include any adjustments that might arise from this uncertainty.
Note 4 - Prepaid compensation
The Company entered into an agreement with its sole officer and director whereby the Company agreed to issue 1,000,000 shares of its $0.001 par value common stock as consideration for an executive consulting contract valued at $147,500 plus $10,000 cash. The terms of the agreement allow for the prepaid compensation in the amount of $147,500 to be earned over a period of one year.
F-8
CareGeneration, Inc.
Notes
Note 5 - Income taxes
For the years ended December 31, 2004, the Company incurred net operating losses and, accordingly, no provision for income taxes has been recorded. In addition, no benefit for income taxes has been recorded due to the uncertainty of the realization of any tax assets. At December 31, 2004, the Company had approximately $1,533 of federal and state net operating losses. The net operating loss carryforwards, if not utilized, will begin to expire in 2023.
The components of the Company's deferred tax asset are as follows:
As of |
|
12/31/04 |
|
Deferred tax assets: | |
Net operating loss carryforwards |
1,533 |
Total deferred tax assets |
1,533 |
Net deferred tax assets before valuation allowance |
1,533 |
Less: Valuation allowance |
(1,533) |
Net deferred tax assets |
$ -0- |
For financial reporting purposes, the Company has incurred a loss in each period since its inception. Based on the available objective evidence, including the Company's history of losses, management believes it is more likely than not that the net deferred tax assets will not be fully realizable. Accordingly, the Company provided for a full valuation allowance against its net deferred tax assets at December 31, 2004.
A reconciliation between the amounts of income tax benefit determined by applying the applicable U.S. and State statutory income tax rate to pre-tax loss is as follows:
12/31/04 |
|
Federal and state statutory rate |
$ (521) |
Change in valuation allowance on deferred tax assets |
521 |
$ -0- |
Note 6 - Stockholders' equity
The Company is authorized to issue 20,000,000 shares of its $0.01 par value common stock.
On February 18, 2004, the Company issued 1,000,000 shares of its $0.01 par value common stock to a sole officer and director in exchange for cash in the amount of $10,000.
As of December 31, 2004, there have been no other issuances of common stock.
Note 7 - Warrants and options
As of December 31, 2004, there were no warrants or options outstanding to acquire any additional shares of common stock.
Note 8 - Loan to affiliate
During the year ended December 31, 2004, the Company loaned $5,000 to an affiliate company with common ownership and management. The note has no interest and is due upon demand. As of December 31, 2004, the total amount owed is $5,000.
F-9
CareGeneration, Inc.
Notes
Note 9 - Prescription Drug Distribution License
On December 27, 2004, the Company's controlling shareholder donated to the company a Wholesale Drug Distribution License issued by the State of Illinois and jointly governed by regulators from the State of Illinois, the U. S. Drug Enforcement Agency and the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. The same shareholder also donated a reciprocal drug distribution license issued by the State of Indiana, a client list and know-how in the form of written (published) drug distribution policies and procedures applicable to independent prescription drug and diagnostic distributors.
The Company has not assigned a value to the prescription drug distribution licenses. Licenses of this nature are tightly regulated and allocated by state and federal authorities and are often transferred as part of asset sales and/or sales of client lists. The Company has placed no value for the client list and know-how also donated.
Note 10 - Related party transactions
The Company does not lease or rent any property. Office space and services are provided without charge by a director and shareholder. Such costs are immaterial to the financial statements and, accordingly, have not been reflected therein. The officers and directors of the Company are involved in other business activities and may, in the future, become involved in other business opportunities. If a specific business opportunity becomes available, such persons may face a conflict in selecting between the Company and their other business interests. The Company has not formulated a policy for the resolution of such conflicts.
Note 11 - Subsequent events
Mergers and acquisitions
On November 3, 2004, and amended on December 27, 2004, the company entered into a Definitive Agreement that called for a series of transactions to be completed between CareDecision Corporation, Pharma Tech Solutions, Inc., CareDecision's "Subsidiary", and the Company, that when accomplished would merge the Company into the Subsidiary and whereby the Subsidiary would be the surviving entity. The parties concluded the activities surrounding this acquisition on January 27, 2005. The acquisition closed on February 25, 2005. Pursuant to the agreements, the Company's shareholders will receive 39,375,000 shares of the Subsidiary's common stock, equaling approximately 49% of the outstanding shares of the Subsidiary, and 42,500,000 of CareDecision Corporation's common stock in exchange for all of the shares of the Company's issued and outstanding common stock and all of the Target preferred stock. In addition, CareDecision Corporation, at closing, will place into escrow up to 100,000,000 common stock shares which may be paid to the Company's stockholders subject to earn-out.
F-10
DEALER PROSPECTUS DELIVERY OBLIGATION
Until ____________________, all dealers that effect transactions in these securities, whether or not participating in this offering, may be required to deliver a prospectus. This is in addition to the dealers' obligation to deliver a prospectus when acting as underwriters and with respect to their unsold allotments or subscriptions.
[Balance of this page intentionally left blank.]
PART II
INFORMATION NOT REQUIRED IN PROSPECTUS
Item 24. Indemnification of Directors and Officers
THE ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION OF THE COMPANY PROVIDE FOR INDEMNIFICATION OF EMPLOYEES AND OFFICERS IN CERTAIN CASES. INSOFAR AS INDEMNIFICATION FOR LIABILITIES ARISING UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933 MAY BE PERMITTED TO DIRECTORS, OFFICERS OR PERSONS CONTROLLING THE COMPANY PURSUANT TO THE FOREGOING PROVISIONS, THE COMPANY HAS BEEN INFORMED THAT IN THE OPINION OF THE SECURTIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION SUCH INDEMNIFICATION IS AGAINST PUBLIC POLICY AS EXPRESSED IN THE ACT AND IS THEREFORE UNENFORCEABLE
Section 78.751 of the Nevada General Corporation Laws provides as follows: 78.751 Indemnification of officers, directors, employees and agents; advance of expenses.
1. A corporation may indemnify any person who was or is a party or is threatened to be made a party to any threatened, pending or completed action, suit or proceeding, whether civil, criminal, administrative or investigative, except an action by or in the right of the corporation, by reason of the fact that he is or was a director, officer, employee or agent of the corporation, or is or was serving at the request of the corporation as a director, officer, employee or agent of another corporation, partnership, joint venture, trust or other enterprise, against expenses, including attorney's fees, judgments, fines and amounts paid in settlement actually and reasonably incurred by him in connection with the action, suitor proceeding if he acted in good faith and in a manner which he reasonably believed to be in or not opposed to the best interests of the corporation, and, with respect to any criminal action or proceeding, had no reasonable cause to believe his conduct was unlawful. The termination of any action, suit or proceeding by judgment, order, settlement, conviction, or upon a plea of nolo contendere or its equivalent, does not, of itself, create a presumption that the person did not act in good faith and in a manner which he reasonably believed to be in or not opposed to the best interests of the corporation, and that, with respect to any criminal action or proceeding, he had reasonable cause to believe that his conduct was unlawful.
2. A corporation may indemnify any person who was or is a party or is threatened to be made a party to any threatened, pending or completed action or suit by or in the right of the corporation to procure a judgment in its favor by reason of the fact that he is or was a director, officer, employee or agent of the corporation, or is or was serving at the request of the corporation as a director, officer, employee or agent of another corporation, partnership, joint venture, trust or other enterprise against expenses, including amounts paid in settlement and attorneys' fees actually and reasonably incurred by him in connection with the defense or settlement of the action or suit if he acted in good faith and in a manner which he reasonably believed to be in or not opposed to the best interests of the corporation. Indemnification may not be made for any claim, issue or matter as to which such a person has been adjudged by a court of competent jurisdiction, after exhaustion of all appeals therefrom, to be liable to the corporation or for amounts paid in settlement to the corporation, unless and only to the extent that the court in which the action or suit was brought or other court of competent jurisdiction determines upon application that in view of all the circumstances of the case, the person is fairly and reasonably entitled to indemnity for such expenses as the court deems proper.
3. To the extent that a director, officer, employee or agent of a corporation has been successful on the merits or otherwise in defense of any action, suit or proceeding referred to in subsections 1 and 2, or in defense of any claim, issue or matter therein, he must be indemnified by the corporation against expenses, including attorneys' fees, actually and reasonably incurred by him in connection with the defense.
4. Any indemnification under subsections 1 and 2, unless ordered by a court or advanced pursuant to subsection 5, must be made by the corporation only as authorized in the specific case upon a determination that indemnification of the director, officer, employee or agent is proper in the circumstances. The determination must be made: (a) By the stockholders: (b) By the board of directors by majority vote of a quorum consisting o directors who were not parties to act, suit or proceeding; (c) If a majority vote of a quorum consisting of directors who were not parties to the act, suit or proceeding so orders, by independent legal counsel in a written opinion; or (d) If a quorum consisting of directors who were not parties to the act, suit or proceeding cannot to obtained, by independent legal counsel in a written opinion; or
5. The Articles of Incorporation, the Bylaws or an agreement made by the corporation may provide that the expenses of officers and directors incurred in defending a civil or criminal, suit or proceeding must be paid by the corporation as they are incurred and in advance of the final disposition of the action, suit or proceeding, upon receipt of an undertaking by or on behalf of the director or officer to repay the amount if it is ultimately determined by a court of competent jurisdiction that he is not entitled to be indemnified by corporation. The provisions of this subsection do not affect any rights to advancement of expenses to which corporate personnel other than the directors or officers may be entitled under any contract or otherwise by law.
6. The indemnification and advancement of expenses authorized in or ordered by a court pursuant to this section: (a) Does not exclude any other rights to which a person seeking indemnification or advancement of expenses may be entitled under the articles of incorporation or any bylaw, agreement, vote of stockholders or disinterested directors or otherwise, for either an action in his official capacity or an action in another capacity while holding his office, except that indemnification, unless ordered by a court pursuant to subsection 2 or for the advancement of expenses made pursuant to subsection 5, may not be made to or on behalf of any director or officer if a final adjudication establishes that his act or omissions involved intentional misconduct, fraud or a knowing violation of the law and was material to the cause of action. (b) Continues for a person who has ceased to be a director, officer, employee or agent and endures to the benefit of the heirs, executors and administrators of such a person. Insofar as indemnification for liabilities arising under the Securities Act may be permitted to directors, officers and controlling persons of the Registrant pursuant to the foregoing provisions, or otherwise, the Registrant has been advised that in the opinion of the Securities and Exchange Commission such indemnification is against public policy as expressed in the Securities Act and is, therefore, unenforceable. In the event that a claim for indemnification against such liabilities (other than the payment by the registrant of expenses incurred or paid by a director, officer or controlling person of the Registrant in the successful defense of any action, suit or proceeding) is asserted by such director, officer or controlling person in connection with the securities being registered, the Registrant will, unless in the opinion of its counsel the matter has been settled by controlling precedent, submit to a court of appropriate jurisdiction the question whether such indemnification by it is against public policy as expressed in the Securities Act and will be governed by the final adjudication of such issue.
Item 25. Expenses of Issuance and Distribution
The following is an itemized statement of the estimated amounts of all expenses payable by the registrant in connection with the registration of the common stock offered hereby:
Nature of Expenses |
Amount |
|
SEC Registration Fee |
$ |
1,219 |
Accounting Fees and Expenses |
$ |
10,500 |
Legal Fees and Expenses |
$ |
15,000 |
Printing Expenses |
$ |
1,000 |
Blue Sky Qualification Fees and Expenses |
$ |
1,000 |
Transfer Agent's Fee |
$ |
2,500 |
TOTAL |
$ |
31,219 |
Item 26. Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities
The following paragraphs set forth information with respect to all securities sold by us since inception without registration under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the "Securities Act"). The information includes the names of the purchasers, the date of issuance, the title and number of securities sold and the consideration received by us for the issuance of these shares.
The consulting services agreements were made with such investors that are sophisticated investors based on their financial resources and knowledge of investments. They had access to or were provided with relevant financial and other information relating to us. Accordingly, the issuance of shares was exempt from the registration requirements of the Act pursuant to Section 4(2) of the Act.
On March 16, 2001, InstaCare issued 875,000 shares of its $0.001 par value common stock to Mr. Michael Vogel for cash of $875 and 1,750,000 shares of par value common stock to Mr. Robert L. Cox in exchange for cash in the amount of $1,750.
During March 2001, InstaCare issued 1,525,000 shares to G&M Management & Administrative Services, Ltd., (Andrew Pieri is the President) for $49,500. This transaction was made in accordance with Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, which exempts from registration transactions by an issuer not involving a "public offering."
During March 2001, we issued 350,000 shares to Corporate Regulatory Services, LLC in lieu of services rendered in the amount of $26,250. The issuance of shares represented payment for facilitating the preparation of the documentation necessary to become a publicly traded company. This stock issuance was made in accordance with Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. The consulting company is a sophisticated purchaser. They were provided full and complete access to our corporate records, as they assisted us in preparing our offering documentation. No brokers or dealers were involved in this transaction and no discounts or commissions were paid.
In March of 2001, we issued 3,500,000 shares of our $0.001 par value common stock at $0.10 per share to Sarcor Management, SA, a British Virgin Island corporation, as a $350,000 down payment on a technology licensing agreement.
Effective May 7, 2001, we amended our articles of incorporation increasing our authorized shares from 20,000,000 to 100,000,000 shares of $0.001 par value common stock. All references to shares issued and outstanding reflect the increase of authorization of 100,000,000 issuable shares affected May 7, 2001.
On May 26, 2001 we conducted an offering in which we issued 1,340,000 shares of common stock to 17 unaffiliated shareholders at a price of $0.10 per share, for total receipts of $134,000 in cash. This offering was made in reliance upon an exemption from the registration provisions of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, in accordance with Regulation D, Rule 504 of the Act. In addition, this offering was made on a best efforts basis and was not underwritten. In regards to the May 2001 offering, listed below are the requirements set forth under Regulation D, Rule 504 and the facts which support the availability of Rule 504 to the May 2001 offering:
a. Exemption. Offers and sales of securities that satisfy the conditions in paragraph (b) of this Rule 504 by an issuer that is not:
Facts: At the time of the May 2001 offering, we were not subject to the reporting requirements of section 13 or section 15(d) of the Exchange Act. Further, we are not now, nor were we at the time of the May 2001 offering, considered to be an investment company. Finally, since inception, we have pursued a specific business plan of placing information technology ("IT") professionals with technology sector companies on a temporary or permanent basis and continue to do so.
b. Conditions to be met.
1. General Conditions. To qualify for exemption under this Rule 504, offers and sales must satisfy the terms and conditions of Rule 501 and Rule 502 (a), (c) and (d), except that the provisions of Rule 502 (c) and (d) will not apply to offers and sales of securities under this Rule 504 that are made:
Facts: On May 17, 2001, we were issued a permit to sell securities by the State of New York, pursuant to our application for registration by qualification of our offering of Common Stock in that state. The application for registration by qualification was filed pursuant to the provisions of Section 359-e of the New York General Business Law, which requires the public filing and delivery to investors of a substantive disclosure document before sale. On August 24, 2001, we completed a public offering of shares of our common stock pursuant to Regulation D, Rule 504 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and the registration by qualification of said offering in the State of New York, whereby we sold 1,340,000 shares of Common Stock to approximately 17 unaffiliated shareholders of record, none of whom were or are officers or directors of ours. The entire offering was conducted exclusively in the State of New York, pursuant to the permit issued by the State of New York.
2. The aggregate offering price for an offering of securities under this Rule 504, as defined in Rule 501(c), shall not exceed $1,000,000, less the aggregate offering price for all securities sold within the twelve months before the start of and during the offering of securities under this Rule 504, in reliance on any exemption under section 3(b), or in violation of section 5(a) of the Securities Act.
Facts: The aggregate offering price for the May 2001 offering was $400,000, of which $134,000 was raised in the offering.
In October of 2001, we issued 150,000 shares of our $0.001 par value common stock to Mary Lou Cox, mother of Robert Cox, InstaCare's president, for consulting services valued at $15,000. Ms. Cox provided general clerical and administrative services to InstaCare in lieu of salary or hourly wage.
In October of 2001, we issued 500,000 shares of our $0.001 par value common stock to James De Luca, an independent consultant, for consulting services valued at $50,000. Mr. De Luca helped InstaCare put in place policies and procedures for its IT recruitment business and also provided InstaCare's then Vice-President with a list of IT candidates and contacts in lieu of a salary or hourly wage.
On February 17, 2002, InstaCare executed a business consulting agreement with MLSA whereby InstaCare issued 1,350,000 shares of its $0.001 par value common stock to Mark Lancaster for consulting services valued at $162,000. The consulting services are to be rendered over a period of 90 days with an automatic three-month renewal provision. Previously filed via an S-8 on 3/1/02. Mr. Lancaster's services included his providing certain strategic planning services to the Corporation in the area of short term IT recruiting, aiding and assisting the Corporation as a consultant to potential strategic alliances with other similar short term IT firms.
On February 26, 2002, InstaCare executed a consulting agreement with Qurag, Inc. whereby InstaCare issued 475,000 shares to Chaim Drizin, a shareholder of InstaCare, for consulting services valued at $30,875. The consulting services are to be rendered over a period of 90 days with an automatic three-month renewal provision. Previously filed via an S-8 on 3/1/02.
Mr. Drizin's services include, providing certain strategic planning services to the Corporation, aiding and assisting the Corporation as a consultant to potential strategic alliances with companies in Brooklyn, NY that were primarily Orthodox Jewish owned, in particular in the insurance trade.
On March 27, 2002, InstaCare executed a consulting agreement with Promark, Inc. whereby InstaCare issued 500,000 shares to Ken Lowman for consulting services valued at $50,000. The consulting services are to be rendered over a period of 90 days with an automatic three-month renewal provision. Mr. Lowman's services included, providing certain strategic planning services to the Corporation as it prepared to be publicly traded and aiding and assisting the Corporation as a consultant to potential strategic alliances with Canadian firms.
On July 9, 2002, we issued a total of 32,968,863 shares of its $0.001 par value common stock pursuant to its reverse merger with Medicius, Inc. whereby each shareholder received three Company common stock shares for every one Medicius, Inc. common share held, and three point five Company shares for each preferred share. In addition each shareholder received one-half warrant for each Medicius, Inc. share held.
On July 12, 2002, InstaCare executed an addendum to the March 27, 2002, consulting agreement with Promark, Inc. whereby InstaCare issued 3,000,000 shares of its $0.001 par value common stock to Ken Lowman for consulting services valued at $150,000. The consulting services were to be rendered over a period of 90 days with an automatic three-month renewal provision.
On August 1, 2002, CareDecision.net, Inc. elected to convert those preferred shares that it owned in the merger target Medicius, inc. into 1,725,000 shares of our $0.001 par value common stock based upon the merger conversion formula for Medicius, Inc. preferred shares whereby CareDecision.net, Inc. received 3.5 common stock shares in InstaCare for each Medicius, Inc. preferred share.
On August 9, 2002, we issued 2,000,000 restricted shares of our Common Stock to Barbara Asbell for consulting services valued at $80,000. We relied upon an exemption pursuant to Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933.
On September 4, 2002, we issued 950,000 shares of our Common Stock to Barbara Asbell for consulting services valued at $38,000. We relied upon an exemption pursuant to Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933.
On October 8, 2002 we issued 6,327,737 shares of our Common Stock as more fully described below. Shares to the shareholders listed in Table A were issued for conversion of their pre-June 2002 Medicius, Inc. notes. Shares issued to the shareholders in Table B were issued for services provided to Medicius, Inc. prior to the June 2002 merger. In each instance when issuing these shares the Company relied upon an exemption pursuant to Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933.
Table A
NAME |
NUMBER OF SHARES |
MONETARY VALUE |
Catherine Dewitt |
726,000 |
36,300.00 |
Leon B. Eisikowitz |
38,070 |
1,903.50 |
Allen Zev Friedman |
152,250 |
7,612.50 |
Marlene Kriger |
38,070 |
1,903.50 |
Frady Makowsky |
43,395 |
2,169.75 |
Joseph Makowsky |
87,015 |
4,350.75 |
Benjamin Mayer |
600,000 |
30,000.00 |
New York Auto Mall |
217,485 |
10,874,25 |
P R Diamonds |
76,125 |
3,806.25 |
Jennifer C. Schiffman |
152,250 |
7,612.50 |
David Schwartz |
810,000 |
40,500.00 |
Morris Weiss |
61,350 |
3,067.50 |
Moshe Williger |
87,015 |
4,350.75 |
Table B
Anfel Trading |
524,781 |
26,239.05 |
Barbara Asbell |
218,057 |
10,902.85 |
Michael Belcher |
9,722 |
486.10 |
Keith Berman |
848,768 |
42,438.40 |
Alan Binder |
5,556 |
277.80 |
John Garber |
365,001 |
18,250.05 |
Robert Jagunich |
773,768 |
38,688.40 |
William Lyons |
272,224 |
13,611.20 |
Sanjay Patel |
122,223 |
6,111.15 |
Michael Petras |
66,667 |
3,333.35 |
Tom Poff |
9,722 |
486.10 |
Shabnam Sharabi |
5,556 |
277.80 |
Leslie Wolf |
16,667 |
833.35 |
On November 21, 2002 we issued 875,000 restricted shares of common stock, to CareDecision.net, Inc., for purchasing the empower care software and the care.net web domain of CareDecision.net, Inc. We contracted for this transaction on September 30, 2002 but it was not completed until November 21,2002. We valued this issuance at $51,115.00. We relied on an exemption to registration pursuant to Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933.
On November 21, 2002 we issued 1,267,963 restricted shares of common stock, to Keith Berman for his retiring his Note. We valued this issuance at $44,532.00. We contracted for this transaction on September 30, 2002 but it was not completed until November 21,2002. We relied on an exemption to registration pursuant to Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933.
On November 21, 2002, we issued 640,000 restricted shares of CareDecision Corporation common stock to Robert Jagunich for his exercising 640,000 merger warrants at a strike price of $0.05. Mr. Jagunich initiated this transaction on September 30, 2002 but it was not completed until November 21,2002. The warrants underlying these shares were issued pursuant to the merger with Medicius, Inc. We relied upon an exemption to registration under Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933.
On November 12, 2002, we issued a total of 2,000,000 restricted shares of its Common Stock to Robert Koch for consulting services valued at $80,000. Mr. Koch also requested a transfer of 1,500,000 of his restricted shares to a third party as a part of this transaction. The total restricted shares issued was 2,000,000. We contracted with Mr. Koch for this transaction on September 30, 2002 but it was not completed until November 21,2002. We relied on an exemption to registration pursuant to Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933.
On November 12, 2002, we issued 2,539,574 restricted shares of its Common Stock to Paradigm Partners for consulting services valued at $101,582.96. We contracted for this transaction on September 30, 2002 but it was not completed until November 21,2002. We relied on an exemption to registration pursuant to Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933. Paradigm was retained to provide information technology consulting to us to ascertain the applicability of our technologies to other markets. Paradigm had interest and expertise in certain real-estate.
On December 17, 2002, InstaCare issued 1,500,000 shares of our Common Stock to Glen Greenfelder, Jr. for consulting services and professional services valued at $96,000.
On January 24, 2003, InstaCare issued 2,000,000 shares of its Common Stock to Dr. Joseph Wolf for general medical, third party reimbursement, pharmacy benefits management and pharmaceutical consulting services. We valued these shares at $84,000
On January 24, 2003, InstaCare issued 3,500,000 shares of its Common Stock to Dr. Thomas Chillemi for personal services contract for medical consulting services and medical speaking engagements. We valued these shares at $147,000.
On August 18, 2003 InstaCare issued 75,000 shares each, to four employees as partial fulfillment of employment bonuses, for a total of 300,000 shares as follows:
Name |
Number of Shares |
Price |
Monetary Value |
Alan Binder | 75,000 | $.0694 | $5,208 |
Shabnam Sharabi | 75,000 | $.0694 | $5,208 |
Dale Richter | 75,000 | $.0694 | $5,208 |
Tom Poff | 75,000 | $.0694 | $5,208 |
On August 18, 2003 InstaCare issued 1,500,000 shares of common stock to Anthony Quintiliana for contract services whereby Mr. Quintiliana would introduce InstaCare to potential commercial residential management companies in New York, New Jersey and Pennsylvania. The consulting services are to be rendered over a period of 90 days with an automatic three-month renewal provision.
On August 18, 2003 InstaCare issued 2,500,000 shares of common stock to Barbara Asbell for contract services whereby Ms. Asbell services included the provision of certain strategic human resources services particularly in recruiting and hiring of programmers with a Microsoft Windows CE background. We valued this share issuance at $125,000.00.
On September 12, 2003 InstaCare issued 20,801,623 restricted shares to shareholders listed below. A description of each issuance follows the table:
Robert Jagunich |
4,127,093 |
Contract services | |
Wizard Enterprises |
1,888,855 |
Contract services | |
Wizard Enterprises |
2,500,000 |
Contract services | |
Barbara Asbell |
1,000,000 |
Business consulting | |
Robert Cox |
1,500,000 |
Merger shares bonus | |
Keith Berman |
1,250,000 |
Merger shares bonus | |
William Lyons |
1,250,000 |
Merger shares bonus | |
CareDecision.net, Inc. |
2,500,000 |
March 2003 technology acquisition agreement | |
Thomas Chillemi |
1,538,500 |
Note conversion | |
David Mizrahi |
741,875 |
Settlement | |
Sanjay Patel |
2,500,000 |
Transfer upon instructions from CareDecision.net | |
David Weinstein |
5,300 |
Correction of issuance error |
On March 28, 2003, InstaCare received $50,000 from Dr. Thomas Chillemi, an InstaCare shareholder and consultant. Dr. Chillemi's Note was convertible into 1,538,500 shares of InstaCare's $0.001 par value common stock and carries with it 1,538,500 warrants exercisable on a one-for-one basis at a strike price at $0.0325 per share. On April 22, 2003 Dr. Chillemi exercised the convertible portion of his Note and thereby converted the $50,000 debt into 1,538,500 shares of InstaCare's $.001 par value common stock. The share certificate for this conversion was issued on September 12, 2003. When issuing these shares we relied on an exemption to registration pursuant to Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933.
On March 31, 2003, InstaCare acquired fully-developed software from CareDecision.net, Inc, a private corporation with several control persons serving in similar positions at InstaCare. Pursuant to the agreement memorializing this transaction, InstaCare paid CareDecision.net, Inc. the sum of $181,250 by issuing 2,500,000 shares of InstaCare's $0.001 par value common stock. These shares were issued on September 12, 2003. When issuing these shares we relied on an exemption to registration pursuant to Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933.
On May 15, 2003, InstaCare and Mr. David Mizrahi settled a dispute that arose after the merger with Medicius, Inc., but that encompassed activities that pre-dated the merger. As a settlement InstaCare issued 741,875 restricted shares to Mr. Mizrahi and valued these shares at $37,094.00. These shares were issued on September 12, 2003. When issuing these shares we relied on an exemption to registration pursuant to Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933.
On May 15, 2003, InstaCare and Mr. David Weinstein settled a share issuance error owing to unreadable documentation. As a settlement InstaCare issued 5,300 restricted shares to Mr. Weinstein and valued these shares at $205.00. These shares were issued on September 12, 2003. When issuing these shares we relied on an exemption to registration pursuant to Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933.
On December 13, 2002, InstaCare executed a consulting agreement with Barbara Asbell, a shareholder of InstaCare, whereby InstaCare was required to issue 1,000,000 restricted shares for consulting services. The consulting services were over a period of not less than 90 days with an automatic three-month renewal provision. Ms. Asbell's services included the provision of certain strategic human resources services particularly in recruiting and hiring of programmers with a Microsoft Windows CE background. The shares were issued on September 12, 2003 subsequent to Ms. Asbell's fulfillment of the contract. When issuing these shares we relied on an exemption to registration pursuant to Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933. We valued these shares at $50,000.00
On September 12, 2003, InstaCare issued shares to Wizard Enterprises ("Wizard"). On December 13, 2002, InstaCare executed a consulting agreement Wizard, whereby InstaCare was required to issue 2,500,000 restricted shares for consulting services. The consulting services were to be rendered until that agreement terminated pursuant to written notification. Wizard's consulting services related to introductions of InstaCare's then new residential management product concept. The first consulting retainer was completed for introductions in New York City. The shares were issued when the contract was fulfilled.. The value of these services was $125,000.00. When issuing these shares we relied on an exemption to registration pursuant to Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933. On December 20, 2002, InstaCare executed a second consulting agreement with Wizard Enterprises ("Wizard"), whereby InstaCare was required to issue 1,888,855 restricted shares for consulting the continuation of the adduced The shares were issued when the contract was fulfilled. These shares were also issued on September 12, 2003. The value of these services was $75,554.00. When issuing these shares we relied on an exemption to registration pursuant to Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933.
On September 12, 2003, InstaCare issued shares to Mr. Keith Berman, Mr. William Lyons and Mr. Robert Cox. On December 19, 2002 the Board of Directors agreed to issue restricted shares to Robert Cox, Keith Berman and William Lyons, pursuant to a bonus arrangement clause in the merger agreement between InstaCare and its merger target Medicius, Inc. Messrs. Berman and Lyons each were to receive 1,250,000 restricted shares and Mr. Cox, the CEO of InstaCare, 1,500,000 restricted shares. These shares were issued on September 12, 2003. The total of 4,000,000 restricted shares were valued at $160,000.00.
On September 12, 2003, instaCare issued 4,127,093 shares of restricted stock to Mr. Robert Jagunich for consulting services rendered to the Company during the year ended December 31, 2002. The share issuance was valued at $123,813.00. The Company relied upon exemption to registration provided by Section 4(2) of the Securities Axt of 1933.
On September 12, 2003, InstaCare Issued to Mr. Sanjay Patel 2,500,000 share of $0.001 par value common stock. When issuing these shares we relied on an exemption to registration pursuant to Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933. These particular shares were issued as a result of notice received from CareDecision.net, Inc. whereby it was stated that it wished to transfer the 2,500,000 restricted shares it was to have received from the March 31, 2003 technology acquisition transaction to Mr. Sanjay Patel. CareDecision.net, Inc. asked InstaCare to provide the stock transfer agent with their transfer instructions. Upon receipt of these instructions on September 12, 2003, the transfer agent made a clerical error, issuing share certificates for the same shares to both CareDecision.net, Inc. and Mr. Patel. Upon notification to the stock transfer agent the share certificate for CareDecision.net, Inc. was canceled on September 26, 2003. Thus, InstaCare did not put a value on the share certificate for 2,500,000 shares to Mr. Patel since the shares provided to Mr. Patel had been valued upon their issue to CareDecision.net, Inc. Please see above.
On September 18, 2003 InstaCare issued to Mr. Anthony Quintiliana,1,500,000 shares $0.001 par value common stock for consulting services. The shares are registered and free-trading via Form S-8. The value of the shares was $60,000. The consulting services were to be rendered for a period of 90 days, unless terminated pursuant to written notification by either InstaCare or Quintiliana. Quintiliana's consulting services related to introductions of InstaCare's then new residential management product concept for introductions to residential management companies on Long Island and southern New Jersey. When issuing shares we relied on an exemption to registration pursuant to Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933.
On September 30, 2003 InstaCare issued to Mr. Anthony Quintiliana 500,000 shares of $0.001 par value common stock for extending his September 18, 2003 consulting and introduction responsibilities. The value of the shares on the grant is $20,000. When issuing these shares we relied on an exemption to registration pursuant to Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933.
On September 30, 2003 InstaCare executed a consulting agreement with Leslie-Michelle Abraham, whereby InstaCare issued 850,000 stock options, said options exercised into common stock shares for consulting services and cash. The consulting services are to be rendered by Abraham until the Agreement terminates pursuant to written notification by either InstaCare or Abraham. Abraham's services were retained to secure a licensee or buyer for certain of InstaCare's medical software assets. On December 17, 2003 InstaCare issued an additional 500,000 shares to Abraham for her continued efforts under the same agreement.
October 1, 2003 InstaCare executed a consulting agreement with Thomas Chillemi, a medical doctor, whereby InstaCare issued 1,000,000 stock options, said options exercised by Chillemi for consulting services and cash. The consulting services are to be rendered by Chillemi until the Agreement terminates pursuant to written notification by either InstaCare or Chillemi. Chillemi's services were retained to locate and secure a closed-door pharmacy for acquisition. On November 8, 2003, November 26, 2003 and December 3, 2003 InstaCare issued 1,000,000 stock options said options exercised by Chillemi into shares.
On November 26, 2003 InstaCare rendered to Chillemi 2,500,000 shares for additional consulting services whereby Dr. Chillemi was retained to provide speeches, presentations and materials in structured settings to parties interested in investing or doing business with CareDecision Corporation. Chillemi agreed to limit his presentations to technical and medical issues in his area of expertise. The value of the shares on the issue date was $100,000.
On December 17, 2003, we issued to Leslie -Michelle Abraham, an InstaCare shareholder, 500,000 shares of $0.001 par value common stock at a strike price of $0.04 per share pursuant to our 2003 Stock Option Plan. Dr. Wolf provided medical consulting services. The shares are registered and free-trading via Form S-8. The value of the shares on the date of the grant was $20,000.
On December 17, 2003, we issued to Mr. Anthony Quintiliana, an InstaCare shareholder, 800,000 shares of $0.001 par value common stock at a strike price of $0.04 per share pursuant to our 2003 Stock Option Plan. Mr. Quintiliana provided corporate development consulting. The shares are registered and free-trading via Form S-8. The value of the shares on the issue date was $32,000.
On January 9, 2004 we issued to Dr. Thomas Chillemi, an InstaCare shareholder, 2,600,000 shares of $0.001 par value common stock for additional consulting services whereby Dr. Chillemi was retained to provide speeches, presentations and materials in structured settings to parties interested in investing or doing business with us. Chillemi agreed to limit his presentations to technical and medical issues in his area of expertise. The value of the shares at the date of the grant was $104,000.
On January 13, 2004, we issued to Mr. Eli Mandell, an InstaCare shareholder, 150,000 shares of $0.001 par value common stock at a strike price of $0.05 per share pursuant to our 2003 Stock Option Plan to perform strategic and developmental services. The shares are registered and free-trading via Form S-8. The value of the shares on the grant is $7,500.
On January 13, 2004, we issued to Armada Group USA, a consulting company, 300,000 shares of $0.001 par value common stock in lieu of a cash compensation for professional fees valued at $12,000.
On January 13, 2004, we issued to Mr. David Weinstein, an InstaCare shareholder, 205,000 shares of $0.001 par value common stock in lieu of 2002 merger induced costs valued at $9,225.
On January 30, 2004 we issued to Leslie-Michelle Abraham, an InstaCare shareholder, 300,000 shares of $0.001 par value common stock at a strike price of $0.04 per share pursuant to our 2003 Stock Option Plan. Mr. Abraham performed strategic and developmental consulting services. Each of the shares are registered and free-trading via Form S-8. The value of the shares on the issue date was $12,000.
On January 30, 2004 we issued to Dr. Joseph A. Wolf, an InstaCare shareholder, 400,000 shares of $0.001 par value common stock at a strike price of $0.04 per share pursuant to our 2003 Stock Option Plan. Mr. Wolf performed strategic and developmental consulting services. Each of the shares are registered and free-trading via Form S-8. The value of the shares on the issue date were $16,000.
On January 30, 2004, we issued to Mr. Anthony Quintiliana, an InstaCare shareholder, 550,000 shares of $0.001 par value common stock at a strike price of $0.05 per share pursuant to our 2003 Stock Option Plan. Mr. Quintilinia provided strategic and developmental consulting services. Each of the shares are registered and free-trading via Form S-8. The value of the shares on the issue date was $27,500.
On February 6, 2004, we issued shares to Ms. Barbra Asbell, an InstaCare shareholder, in the amounts of 550,000 and 1,000,000, and 1,750,000 (collectively 3,250,000) shares of $0.001 par value common stock at a strike price of $0.04 per share pursuant to our 2003 Stock Option Plan. Ms. Asbell performed strategic and developmental consulting services. Each of the shares are registered and free-trading via Form S-8. The value of the shares on the issue dates are $20,000, $40,000 and $70,000, respectively, (collectively $130,000).
On February 6, 2004, we issued to Mr. Anthony Quintiliana, an InstaCare shareholder, 600,000 shares of $0.001 par value common stock at a strike price of $0.04 per share pursuant to our 2003 Stock Option Plan. Mr. Quintilinia provided strategic and developmental consulting services. Each of the shares are registered and free-trading via Form S-8. The value of the shares on the issue date was $24,000.
On February 6, 2004, we issued to Dr. Joseph A. Wolf, an InstaCare shareholder, 1,150,000 shares of $0.001 par value common stock at a strike price of $0.04 per share pursuant to our 2003 Stock Option Plan. Mr. Wolf performed strategic and developmental consulting services. Each of the shares was registered and free-trading via Form S-8. The value of the shares on the issue date was 46,000.
On February 6, 2004, we issued to M. Thais Abraham, an InstaCare shareholder, 1,000,000 shares of $0.001 par value common stock. Ms. Abraham provided strategic and developmental consulting services. Each of the shares are registered and free-trading via Form S-8. The value of the shares on the issue date was $40,000.
On February 6, 2004 , we issued to Dr. Thomas Chillemi, an InstaCare shareholder, 1,250,000 shares of $0.001 par value common stock at a strike price of $0.04 per share pursuant to our 2003 Stock Option Plan. Dr. Thomas Chillemi provided corporate development consulting services. The shares are registered and free trading via Form S-8. The value of the shares on the issue date was $50,000.
On February 23, 2004, we issued to Wells & Co., a consulting company, 1,350,000 shares of $0.001 par value common stock for services. The value of the shares on the issue date was $54,000.
On February 23, 2004, we issued to Lima Capital, Inc., a consulting company, 650,000 shares of $0.001 par value common stock for services. The value of the shares was $26,000.
On March 3, 2004, we issued to Dr. Joseph A. Wolf, an InstaCare shareholder, 400,000 shares of $0.001 par value common stock for merger and acquisition consulting pursuant to the exercising of merger warrants at a strike price of $0.04 per share. The value of the shares on the issue date was $16,000.
On March 3, 2004, we issued to Mr. Thais Abraham, an InstaCare shareholder, 500,000 shares of $0.001 par value common stock pursuant to the exercising of merger warrants at a strike price of $0.04 per share. The value of the shares on the issue date was $20,000.
On March 5, 2005 we completed several transactions owing from a note conversion and Note Settlement Agreement that ended a dispute with M & E Equities. An investment group paid $320,000 to M & E Equities as part of a settlement. Once the dispute was settled InstaCare was provided with a list of nominee shareholders by the investment group for the conversion of the note:
Name |
Number of Shares |
Chris Knapp | 1,000,000 |
Corporate Architects, Inc. | 1,270,000 |
Tri-City, Inc. | 1,270,000 |
Wells and Co., Inc. | 1,270,000 |
JC Financial | 1,270,000 |
Lima Capital, Inc. | 1,270,000 |
7,350,000 |
On March 5, 2004 we issued to Mr. Chris Knapp, an investor, 1,000,000 shares of $0.001 par value common stock. Mr. Knapp was a nominee of the investment group that purchased the M & E Equities Note. This transaction resulted from a Note Settlement Agreement with M & E Equities.
On March 5, 2004 we issued to Corporate Architects, Inc., a consulting company and investor, 1,270,000 shares of $0.001 par value common stock. Corporate Architects, Inc. was a nominee of the investment group that purchased the M & E Equities Note ("M&E Note"). This transaction resulted from a Note Settlement Agreement with M & E Equities which allowed for said Note to convert into a total of 7,350,000 shares.
On March 5, 2004 we issued to JC Financial, a consulting company and investor, 1,270,000 shares of $0.001 par value common stock. JC Financial was a nominee of the investment group that purchased the M & E Equities Note ("M&E Note"). This transaction resulted from a Note Settlement Agreement with M & E Equities which allowed for said Note to convert into a total of 7,350,000 shares.
On March 5, 2004 we issued to Wells & Co., Inc., a consulting company and investor, 1,270,000 shares of $0.001 par value common stock. Wells and Co., Inc. was a nominee of the investment group that purchased the M & E Equities Note ("M&E Note"). This transaction resulted from a Note Settlement Agreement with M & E Equities which allowed for said Note to convert into a total of 7,350,000 shares.
On March 5, 2004 we issued to Lima Capital, Inc., a consulting company and investor, 1,270,000 shares of $0.001 par value common stock. Lima Capital, Inc. was a nominee of the investment group that purchased the M & E Equities Note ("M&E Note"). This transaction resulted from a Note Settlement Agreement with M & E Equities which allowed for said Note to convert into a total of 7,350,000 shares.
On March 5, 2004 we issued to Tri-City, Inc., a consulting company and investor, 1,270,000 shares of $0.001 par value common stock. Tri-City, Inc. was a nominee of the investment group that purchased the M & E Equities Note ("M&E Note"). This transaction resulted from a Note Settlement Agreement with M & E Equities which allowed for said Note to convert into a total of 7,350,000 shares.
On March 10, 2004 we issued to New Capital, Inc., a consulting company and investor, was issued 1,480,000 shares of $0.001 par value common stock pursuant to the exercising of Note warrants at a strike price of $0.05, which were issued as for its part in the dispute settlement with M&E Equities, LLC. The value of the shares was $74,000.
On March 10, 2004 we issued to Wells & Co., a consulting company and investor, was issued 210,000 shares of $0.001 par value common stock pursuant to the exercising of Note warrants at a strike price of $0.05, which were issued as for its part in the dispute settlement with M&E Equities, LLC. The value of the shares was $10,500.
On March 10, 2004 we issued to Tri-city, a consulting company and investor, was issued 210,000 shares of $0.001 par value common stock pursuant to the exercising of Note warrants at a strike price of $0.05, which were issued as for its part in the dispute settlement with M&E Equities, LLC. The value of the shares was $10,500.
On March 10, 2004 we issued to Corporate Architect, Inc., a consulting company and investor, was issued 210,000 shares of $0.001 par value common stock pursuant to the exercising of Note warrants at a strike price of $0.05, which were issued as for its part in the dispute settlement with M&E Equities, LLC. The value of the shares was $10,500.
On March 10, 2004 we issued to J.C. Financial, a consulting company and investor, was issued 210,000 shares of $0.001 par value common stock pursuant to the exercising of Note warrants at a strike price of $0.05, which were issued as for its part in the dispute settlement with M&E Equities, LLC. The value of the shares was $10,500.
On March 10, 2004 we issued to Lima Capital, Inc., a consulting company and investor, was issued 210,000 shares of $0.001 par value common stock pursuant to the exercising of Note warrants at a strike price of $0.05, which were issued as for its part in the dispute settlement with M&E Equities, LLC. The value of the shares was $10,500.
On March 10, 2004 we issued to Mr. Frank Manfredi, an InstaCare shareholder, and investor, was issued 1,000,000 shares of $0.001 par value common stock pursuant to the exercising of Note warrants at a strike price of $0.05, which were issued as for its part in the dispute settlement with M&E Equities, LLC. The value of the shares was $50,000.
On March 10, 2004 we issued to CareDecision.net, Inc., an affiliated company and investor, was issued 1,480,000 shares of $0.001 par value common stock pursuant to the exercising of Note warrants at a strike price of $0.05, which were issued as for its part in the dispute settlement with M&E Equities, LLC. The value of the shares was $74,000.
On March 10, 2004 we issued to Ms. Barbara Asbell, an InstaCare shareholder, was issued 1,500,000 shares of $0.001 par value common stock pursuant to the exercising of Note warrants at a strike price of $0.05, which were issued as for her part in the dispute settlement with M&E Equities, LLC. The value of the shares was $75,000.
On March 16, 2004, we issued to Ms. Thais Abraham, an InstaCare shareholder, 1,553,500 shares of $0.001 par value common stock pursuant to the exercising of merger warrants at a strike price of $0.04 per share. The value of the shares on the date of issuance was $62,140.
On March 16, 2004, we issued to Dr. Joseph A. Wolf, an InstaCare shareholder, 1,553,500 shares of $0.001 par value common stock pursuant to the exercising of merger warrants at a strike price of $0.04 per share. The value of the shares on the date of issuance was $62,140.
On March 16, 2004, we issued to Leslie-Michelle Abraham, an InstaCare shareholder, 1,553,500 shares of $0.001 par value common stock pursuant to the exercising of merger warrants at a strike price of $0.04 per share. The value of the shares on the date of issuance was $62,140.
On April 2, 2004, we issued to Mr. Anthony Quintiliana, an InstaCare shareholder, 750,000 shares of $0.001 par value common stock for services rendered, and a cash compensation of $7,000. The value of the shares on the date of issuance was $30,000.
On April 2, 2004, we issued to Mr. William Walling, an InstaCare shareholder, 120,000 shares of $0.001 par value common stock for services rendered, and a cash compensation of $7,000. The value of the shares on the date of issuance was $4,800.
On April 2, 2004, we issued to Mr. Gerald Turner, an InstaCare shareholder, 40,000 shares of $0.001 par value common stock for services rendered to improve our Web Site. The value of the shares on the date of issuance was $1,600.
On April 2, 2004, we issued to Mr. Chris Knapp, an InstaCare shareholder, 500,000 shares of $0.001 par value common stock for services rendered. The value of the shares on the date of issuance was $20,000.
On April 2, 2004, we issued to Mr. Frank Manfredi, an InstaCare shareholder, 500,000 shares of $0.001 par value common stock for services rendered. The value of the shares on the date of issuance was $20,000.
On April 13, 2004, we issued to Mr. Chris Knapp, an InstaCare shareholder, 1,200,000 shares of $0.001 par value common stock for services rendered. The value of the shares on the date of issuance was $48,000.
On April 13, 2004, we issued to Mr. Frank Manfredi, an InstaCare shareholder, 1,200,000 shares of $0.001 par value common stock for services rendered. The value of the shares on the date of issuance was $48,000.
On April 13, 2004, we issued to Tri-City, Inc., a consulting company, 1,000,000 shares of $0.001 par value common stock for services rendered. The value of the shares on the date of issuance was $40,000.
On April 13, 2004, we issued to Mr. Peter Dunne, an InstaCare shareholder, 1,000,000 shares of $0.001 par value common stock for services rendered. The value of the shares on the date of issuance was $40,000.
On April 13, 2004, we issued to Mr. Anthony Quintiliana, an InstaCare shareholder, 650,000 shares of $0.001 par value common stock for services rendered and a Note settlement. The value of the shares on the date of issuance was $26,000.
On April 13, 2004, we issued to CJR Capital, a consulting company, 1,000,000 shares of $0.001 par value common stock as a fee for the investment they helped arrange with Pinnacle Investment Partners, LC as payment in kind. The value of the shares on the date of issuance was $62,000.
On April 13, 2004, we issued to Pinnacle Investment Partners, an investment fund, 14,000,000 shares of $0.001 par value common stock at par value, $0.001, and then placed these shares in an escrow account as collateral for a loan. The value of the shares on the date of issuance was $14,000.
On April 20, 2004, we issued to Corporate Architects, Inc., a consulting company, 3,300,000 shares of $0.001 par value common stock resulting from a warrant conversion at a strike price of $0.04, for services rendered. The value of the shares on the date of issuance was $132,000.
On April 28, 2004, we issued to Mr. Peter Dunne, an InstaCare shareholder, 1,000,000 shares of $0.001 par value common stock resulting from a warrant conversion at a strike price of $0.04 per share for services rendered. The value of the shares on the date of issuance was $40,000.
On April 28, 2004, we issued to Mr. Frank Manfredi, an InstaCare shareholder, 500,000 shares of $0.001 par value common stock resulting from a warrant conversion at a strike price of $0.04 per share for services rendered. The value of the shares on the date of issuance was $20,000.
On April 28, 2004, we issued to Mr. Chris Knapp, an InstaCare shareholder, 1,000,000 shares of $0.001 par value common stock resulting from a warrant conversion at a strike price of $0.04 per share for services rendered. The value of the shares on the date of issuance was $40,000.
On April 28, 2004, we issued to JC Financial, a consulting company, 500,000 shares of $0.001 par value common stock resulting from a warrant conversion, at a strike price of $0.04 per share for payment in kind. The value of the shares on the date of issuance was $20,000.
On April 28, 2004, we issued to Desert Southwest Capital, a consulting company, 5,000,000 shares of $0.001 par value common stock resulting from a warrant conversion at a strike price of $0.04 per share for payment in kind. The value of the shares on the date of issuance was $200,000.
On April 28, 2004, we issued to SSJ Enterprises, a consulting company, 250,000 shares of $0.001 par value common stock resulting from a warrant conversion at a strike price of $0.04 per share for services rendered. The value of the shares on the date of issuance was $10,000.
On May 20, 2004, we issued to SSJ Enterprises, a consulting company, 200,000 shares of $0.001 par value common stock resulting from a warrant conversion at a strike price of $0.04 per share for services rendered. The value of the shares on the date of issuance was $8,000.
On May 20, 2004, we issued to Mr. Anthony Quintiliana, an InstaCare shareholder, 550,000 shares of $0.001 par value common stock at $0.04 per share for services rendered and payment in kind. The value of the shares on the date of issuance was $22,000.
On May 28, 2004, we issued to Pinnacle Investment Partners, an investment fund, 3,000,000 shares of $0.001 par value common stock at par value to be escrowed pursuant to our financial arrangement. The value of the shares on the date of issuance was $3,000.
On June 2, 2004, we issued to Mr. Sal Amato, an InstaCare shareholder, 775,000 shares of $0.001 par value common stock resulting from a warrant conversion at a strike price of $0.04 per share for $31,000 cash. The value of the shares on the date of issuance was $31,000.
On June 10, 2004, we issued to DCF Group, a consulting company, 3,000,000 shares of $0.001 par value common stock resulting from a warrant conversion at a strike price of $0.04 per share for services rendered and payment in kind. The value of the shares on the date of issuance was $120,000.
On August 13, 2004 we issued to Ms. Barbara Asbell, an InstaCare shareholder, 9,850,000 shares of $0.001 par value common stock for her business development consulting services. Ms. Asbell was assigned to manage the flow of our expected merger activities. The value of the shares on the date of issuance was $236,400.
On August 13, 2004, we issued to Mr. Anthony Quintiliana, an InstaCare shareholder, 10,150,000 shares of $0.001 par value common stock for his business development consulting services. Mr. Quintiliana was assigned the task of managing our ResidenceWare products for introduction into high rise and high density apartment and townhome complexes. The value of the shares on the date of issuance was $243,600.
On August 25, 2004, we issued to Mr. Edward Meyer, Jr., an InstaCare shareholder, 250,000 shares of $0.001 par value common stock. Mr. Meyer performed strategic and developmental consulting services. The value of the shares on the date of issuance was $8,500.
On August 25, 2004, we issued to Mr. Douglas Stahl, an InstaCare shareholder, 150,000 shares of $0.001 par value common stock. Mr. Stahl represented InstaCare's interests in the transaction that resulted in the M & E Note Settlement Agreement. The value of the shares on the date of issuance was $5,100.
On August 25, 2004, we issued to Mr. Thais Abraham, an InstaCare shareholder, 350,000 shares of $0.001 par value common stock. Ms. Abraham performed strategic and developmental consulting services. The value of the shares on the date of issuance was $11,900.
On September 13, 2004, we issued to Dr. Thomas Chillemi, an InstaCare shareholder, 700,000 shares of $0.001 par value common stock. Dr. Chillemi spoke for our benefit, within his area of expertise, during our road show to help promote our products and services. The value of the shares on the date of issuance was $18,900.
On September 13, 2004, we issued to Mr. Dorsey Tague, an InstaCare shareholder, 400,000 shares of $0.001 par value common stock. Mr. Tague spoke for our benefit, within his area of expertise, during our road show to help promote our products and services. The value of the shares on the date of issuance was $10,800.
On September 13, 2004, we issued to Mr. Chris Knapp, an InstaCare shareholder, 500,000 shares of $0.001 par value common stock. Mr. Knapp spoke for our benefit, within his area of expertise, during our road show to help promote our products and services. The value of the shares on the date of issuance was $13,500.
On September 13, 2004, we issued to Mr. Anthony Quintiliana, an InstaCare shareholder, 450,000 shares of $0.001 par value common stock.. Mr. Quintiliana spoke for our benefit, within his area of expertise, during our road show to help promote our products and services. The value of the shares on the date of issuance was $12,150.
On September 13, 2004, we issued to Aaron Corp., a consulting company, 800,000 shares of $0.001 par value common stock. Aaron Corp. provided consulting service in relation to 3rd party software they developed on our behalf. The value of the shares on the date of issuance was $21,600.
On September 13, 2004, we issued to Daivesh Sanghvi, an InstaCare shareholder, 2,000,000 shares of $0.001 par value common in exchange for the retirement of a $50,000 Note. The value of the shares on the date of issuance was $50,000.
On October 12, 2004 we issued to Dr. Joseph A. Wolf, an InstaCare shareholder, 8,000,000 shares of $0.001 par value common stock at a strike price of $0.02 per share pursuant to our 2004 Stock Option Plan. Mr. Wolf performed strategic medical advisory consulting services relating to our then proposed acquisition of CareGeneration, Inc. Each of the shares is registered and free-trading via Form S-8. The value of the shares on the date of issuance was $160,000.
On October 12, 2004 we issued to Ms. Leslie-Michelle Abraham, an InstaCare shareholder, 8,000,000 shares of $0.001 par value common stock at a strike price of $0.02 per share pursuant to our 2004 Stock Option Plan. Ms. Abraham performed strategic medical advisory consulting services relating to our then proposed acquisition of CareGeneration, Inc. Each of the shares are registered and free-trading via Form S-8. The value of the shares on the date of issuance was $160,000.
On October 12, 2004 we issued to Mr. Thais Abraham, an InstaCare shareholder, 8,000,000 shares of $0.001 par value common stock at a strike price of $0.02 per share. Ms. Abraham performed general developmental consulting services relating to our then proposed acquisition of CareGeneration, Inc. The value of the shares on the date of issuance was $160,000.
On November 2, 2004, we issued to Pinnacle Investment Partners, a consulting company, 2,000,000 shares of $0.001 par value common stock at par value, $0.001. The shares were to be held in escrow, pending our Note renewal, which has occurred pursuant to our financial arrangement. The value of the shares on the date of issuance was $2,000.
On November 2, 2004, we issued to CJR Capital, a consulting company, 2,000,000 shares of $0.001 par value common stock at the strike price of $0.018 per share. The shares were issued as part of Note renewal fees pursuant to our financial arrangement with Pinnacle Investment Partners. The value of the shares on the date of issuance was $36,000.
On November 3, 2004 we issued to Dr. Joseph A. Wolf, an InstaCare shareholder, 6,500,000 shares of $0.001 par value common stock at a strike price of $0.018 per share pursuant to our 2004 Stock Option Plan. Mr. Wolf performed medical license valuation reports and consultation in relation to the then proposed CareGeneration, Inc. merger. Each of the shares is registered and free-trading via Form S-8. The value of the shares on the date of issuance was $117,000.
On November 3, 2004 we issued to Mr. Mordechai Mittledorf, an InstaCare shareholder, 95,000 shares of $0.001 par value common stock at a strike price of $0.018 per share pursuant to our 2004 Stock Option Plan. Mr. Mittledorf performed general corporate consulting. Each of the shares is registered and free-trading via Form S-8. The value of the shares on the date of issuance was $1,710.
On November 3, 2004, we issued to Mr. Edward Meyer, Jr. an InstaCare shareholder, 500,000 shares of $0.001 par value common stock at a strike price of $0.018 per share. Mr. Meyer performed strategic and developmental consulting services. The value of the shares on the date of issuance was $9000.00.
On November 3, 2004, we issued to Mr. Anthony Quintiliana, an InstaCare shareholder, 500,000 shares of $0.001 par value common stock at a strike price of $0.018 for his business development consulting services. The value of the shares on the date of issuance was $9,000.
On November 3, 2004, we issued to Mr. Robert Jagunich, an InstaCare shareholder and an affiliate, 300,000 shares of $0.001 par value common stock at a strike price of $0.018 for Board of Director expenses. The value of the shares on the date of issuance was $5,400.
On November 29, 2004, we issued to Pinnacle Investment Partners, a consulting company, 2,000,000 shares of $0.001 par value common stock at the strike price of $0.019 per share. The shares were issued pursuant our financial arrangement as a Note renewal fee. The value of the shares on the date of issuance was $38,000.
On January 13, 2004, we issued to Lima Capital, Inc., a consulting company, 1,250,000 shares of $0.001 par value restricted common stock for services relating our merger consolidation. The value of the shares was $23,750.
On January 13, 2005, we issued to Pinnacle Investment Partner, a consulting company, 1,000,000 shares of $0.001 par value restricted common stock for services relating our merger consolidation. The value of the shares was $19,000.
On January 13, 2005, we issued to Timko, Inc., a consulting company, 1,250,000 shares of $0.001 par value per share restricted common stock for services relating our merger consolidation. The value of the shares was $23,750.
On January 13, 2005, we issued to Sive, Inc., a consulting company, 1,250,000 shares of $0.001 par value restricted common stock for services relating our merger consolidation. The value of the shares was $23,750.
On January 13, 2005, we issued to Wells Group, Inc., a consulting company, 1,250,000 shares of $0.001 par value restricted common stock for services relating our merger consolidation. The value of the shares was $23,750.
On January 13, 2005, we issued to BMI, Inc., a consulting company, 1,250,000 shares of $0.001 par value restricted common stock for services relating our merger consolidation. The value of the shares was $23,750.
On February 2, 2005, we issued to Mr. Steven Bayern, a shareholder, 2,500,000 shares of $0.001 par value restricted common stock for consulting services relating prescription drug sourcing The value of the shares was $42,500.
On February 2, 2005, we issued to Mr. Nathan Kaplan, a shareholder, 1,2500,000 shares of $0.001 par value restricted common stock for services relating to prescription drug distribution licensing. The value of the shares was $21,500.
On February 2, 2005, we issued to Lima Capital, a consulting company, 5,040,000 shares of $0.001 par value
restricted common stock for services relating our merger consolidation. The value of the shares was $85,680.
On February 2, 2005, we issued to Mr. Chris Knapp, a shareholder, 2,000,000 shares of $0.001 par value restricted common stock for services relating our merger consolidation. The value of the shares was $34,000.
On March 14 2005, we issued to nominees of our consultant PunchBuggy, Inc., a consulting company, 10,000,000 restricted shares of $0.001 par value common stock. The shares were issued pursuant to services provided to facilitate the CareGeneration merger valued at $180,000 on the date of issuance. The expensed portion of the shares on the date of issuance was $151,950 owing to $28,050 in paid cash received from Punchbuggy, Inc. We relied on an exemption to registration under Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933. Upon the date of issuance, PunchBuggy, Inc. distributed said shares to its nominee's as follows:
White Capital |
1,050,000 |
Daniel Wojcik |
210,000 |
James Kilgoar |
1,155,000 |
Robert Huston |
210,000 |
David Thelen |
210,000 |
Alen Baumgartner |
233,333 |
Susan Baumgartner |
233,333 |
Casey Baumgartner |
39,697 |
Jacob Baumgartner |
23,333 |
Timko, Inc. |
800,000 |
Sive, Inc. |
800,000 |
Lima Capital, Inc. |
800,000 |
DCF, Inc. |
660,000 |
Joey Baumgartner |
11,667 |
Joe and Malinda Baumgartner |
23,333 |
Jay Lerner |
116,667 |
James DeLuca |
1,170,000 |
Wendy Block |
1,170,000 |
Dorsey Tague |
1,065,000 |
On March 14, 2005, we issued to the shareholders of the former CareGeneration, Inc., the merger target of our subsidiary Pharma Tech Solutions, Inc., 42,500,000 restricted shares of $0.001 par value common stock, pursuant to the terms of the Definitive Agreement and Plan of Merger. The shares were valued at our par value. The value of the shares on the date of issuance was $42,500.
On March 14, 2005, we issued 17,500,000 restricted shares of $0.001 par value common stock to several consulting parties. The value of the shares on the date of issuance was $315,000. The shares were issued as compensation for services provided to facilitate the closing of our CareGeneration merger. All parties involved with this issuance were familiar with us and assisted with company consolidation issues. On the date of the issuance the cost of shares was $190,000 equal to the value of the services and owing to $125,000 cash received. We relied on an exemption to registration under Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933. The shares were distributed as follows:
BMI Consulting, Inc. |
1,750,000 |
Corporate Financial Ventures LLC |
1,750,000 |
Desert Southwest Capital, Inc. |
1,750,000 |
LoMoney, Inc. |
1,250,000 |
Mirabel, Inc. |
1,250,000 |
Mirabel Consulting, Inc. |
1,500,000 |
St. Andrews, Inc. |
1,750,000 |
SIVE Capital, Inc. |
1,250,000 |
Timco, Inc. |
1,750,000 |
Wells & Company, Inc. |
1,750,000 |
Wells Group, Inc. |
1,750,000 |
On March 24, 2005, we issued to CJR Capital, a consulting company, 4,000,000 shares of $0.001 par value common stock at the strike price of $0.0175 per share The shares were issued for due diligence services relating the cost of the Pinnacle Note extension. The value of the shares on the date of issuance was $70,000.
On March 24, 2005, we issued to Pinnacle Investment Partners, a consulting company, 9,000,000 shares of $0.001 par value common stock at the strike price of $0.0175 per share The shares were issued pursuant our financial arrangement as a Note extension fee. The value of the shares on the date of issuance was $157,500.
On March 24, 2005, we issued to Pinnacle Investment Partners, a consulting company, 88,000,000 shares of $0.001 par value common stock at par value, $0.001, as addition escrow shares to be held as collateral for the Note. The value of the shares on the date of issuance was $88,000.
Item 27. Exhibits
The following documents are filed or incorporated by reference as exhibits to this report:
*Filed Herewith
Item 28. Undertakings
1. The Registrant will, during any period in which it offers or sells securities, file a post-effective amendment to this registration statement to:
(i) Include any prospectus required by Section 10(a)(3) of the Securities Act;
(ii) Reflect in the prospectus any facts or events which, individually or together, represent a fundamental change in the information in the registration statement. Notwithstanding the foregoing, any increase or decrease in volume of securities offered (if the total dollar value of securities offered would not exceed that which was registered) and any deviation from the low or high end of the estimated maximum offering range may be reflected in the form of prospectus filed with the Commission pursuant to Rule 424(b) if, in the aggregate, the changes in volume and price represent no more than 20 percent change in the maximum aggregate offering price set forth in the "Calculation of Registration Fee" table in the effective registration statement; and
(iii) Include any additional or changed material information on the plan of distribution.
2. The Registrant will, for determining liability under the Securities Act, treat each post-effective amendment as a new registration statement of the securities offered, and the offering of the securities at that time to be the initial bona fide offering.
3. The Registrant will file a post-effective amendment to remove from registration any of the securities that remain unsold at the end of the offering.
4. The Registrant will provide to each purchaser, if any, at the closing certificates in such denominations and registered in such names to permit prompt delivery to each purchaser.
5. Insofar as indemnification for liabilities arising under the Securities Act of 1933 (the "Act") may be permitted to directors, officers and controlling persons of the small business issuer pursuant to the foregoing provisions, or otherwise, the small business issuer has been advised that in the opinion of the Securities and Exchange Commission such indemnification is against public policy as expressed in the Act and is, therefore, unenforceable. 6. For purposes of determining any liability under the Act, the information omitted from the form of prospectus filed as part of this registration statement in reliance upon Rule 430A and contained in a form of prospectus filed by the Registrant under Rule 424(b)(1) or (4) or 497(h) under the Act shall be deemed to be part of this registration statement as of the time the Commission declared it effective.
[balance of this page intentionally left blank]
SIGNATURES
In accordance with the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, the following persons in the capacities and on the date indicated have signed this registration statement:
Signature |
|
Title |
Date |
|
/s/ Keith Berman Keith Berman |
|
Principal Accounting Officer |
July 18, 2005 |
End of Filing