TELEPHONE AND DATA SYSTEMS, INC.
ANNUAL REPORT TO SHAREHOLDERS FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2010
Pursuant to SEC Rule 14a-3
The following audited financial statements and certain other financial information for the year ended December 31, 2010, represent Telephone and Data Systems' annual report to shareholders as required by the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC").
The following information was filed with the SEC on February 25, 2011 as Exhibit 13 to Telephone and Data Systems' Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010. Such information has not been updated or revised since the date it was originally filed with the SEC. Accordingly, you are encouraged to review such information together with any subsequent information that we have filed with the SEC and other publicly available information.
Telephone and Data Systems, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Financial Reports Contents
Telephone and Data Systems, Inc.
Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Telephone and Data Systems, Inc. ("TDS") is a diversified telecommunications company providing high-quality telecommunications services in 36 states to approximately 6.1 million wireless customers and 1.1 million wireline equivalent access lines at December 31, 2010. TDS conducts substantially all of its wireless operations through its 83%-owned subsidiary, United States Cellular Corporation ("U.S. Cellular"), and provides wireline services through its incumbent local exchange carrier ("ILEC") and competitive local exchange carrier ("CLEC") operations under its wholly owned subsidiary, TDS Telecommunications Corporation ("TDS Telecom"). TDS conducts printing and distribution services through its majority-owned subsidiary, Suttle-Straus, Inc. ("Suttle-Straus") which represents a small portion of TDS' operations.
The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with TDS' audited consolidated financial statements and the description of TDS' business included in Item 1 of the TDS Annual Report on Form 10-K ("Form 10-K") for the year ended December 31, 2010.
The following is a summary of certain selected information contained in the comprehensive Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations that follows. The summary does not contain all of the information that may be important. You should carefully read the entire Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations and not rely solely on the overview.
U.S. Cellular
U.S. Cellular provides wireless telecommunications services to approximately 6.1 million customers in five geographic market areas in 26 states. As of December 31, 2010, U.S. Cellular's average penetration rate in its consolidated operating markets was 13.0%. U.S. Cellular operates on a customer satisfaction strategy, striving to meet or exceed customer needs by providing a comprehensive range of wireless products and services, excellent customer support, and a high-quality network. U.S. Cellular's business development strategy is to acquire and operate controlling interests in wireless licenses in areas adjacent to or in proximity to its other wireless licenses, thereby building contiguous operating market areas. U.S. Cellular believes that operating in contiguous market areas will continue to provide it with certain economies in its capital and operating costs.
Financial and operating highlights in 2010 included the following:
1
Telephone and Data Systems, Inc.
Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
decline in the average number of customers of 55,000, partially offset by a slight increase in average monthly service revenue per customer.
U.S. Cellular anticipates that its future results will be affected by the following factors:
2
Telephone and Data Systems, Inc.
Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
See "Results of OperationsWireless."
2011 Wireless Estimates
U.S. Cellular's estimates of full-year 2011 results are shown below. Such estimates represent U.S. Cellular's views as of the date of filing of U.S. Cellular's Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010. Such forward-looking statements should not be assumed to be accurate as of any future date. U.S. Cellular undertakes no duty to update such information whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. There can be no assurance that final results will not differ materially from such estimated results.
|
2011 Estimated Results |
2010 Actual Results |
|||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Service revenues |
$ | 4,000 - 4,100 million | $ | 3,913.0 million | |||
Adjusted OIBDA(1)(3) |
$ | 775 - 875 million | $ | 783.1 million | |||
Operating income(3) |
$ | 185 - 285 million | $ | 195.4 million | |||
Depreciation, amortization and accretion expenses, and losses on asset disposals and impairment of assets(2) |
Approx. $590 million | $ | 587.8 million | ||||
Capital expenditures(3) |
Approx. $650 million | $ | 583.1 million |
U.S. Cellular management currently believes that the foregoing estimates represent a reasonable view of what is achievable considering actions that U.S. Cellular has taken and will be taking. However, the current general economic conditions in the markets served by U.S. Cellular have created a challenging business environment that could continue to significantly impact actual results. U.S. Cellular expects to continue its focus on customer satisfaction by delivering a high quality network, attractively priced service plans, a broad line of wireless devices and other products, and outstanding customer service in its company-owned and agent retail stores and customer care centers. U.S. Cellular believes that future growth in its revenues will result primarily from selling additional products and services, including data products and services, to its existing customers, increasing the number of multi-device users among its existing customers, and attracting wireless users switching from other wireless carriers, rather than by adding users that are new to wireless service. U.S. Cellular is focusing on opportunities to increase revenues, pursuing cost reduction initiatives in various areas and implementing a number of initiatives to
3
Telephone and Data Systems, Inc.
Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
enable future growth. The initiatives are intended, among other things, to allow U.S. Cellular to accelerate its introduction of new products and services, better segment its customers for new services and retention, sell additional services such as data, expand its Internet sales and customer service capabilities, improve its prepaid products and services and reduce operational expenses over the long term.
TDS Telecom
TDS Telecom provides high-quality telecommunication services, including full-service local exchange service, long-distance telephone service and broadband access, to rural and suburban area communities. TDS Telecom's business plan is designed for a full-service telecommunications company, including both ILEC and CLEC operations. TDS Telecom's strategy is to be the preferred provider of voice, high-speed data, and video services in its chosen markets and also offers a wide range of IP-based voice and data services to businesses. This strategy encompasses many components, including:
Both TDS Telecom's ILEC and CLEC operations are faced with significant challenges, including competition from cable television, wireless and other wireline providers, decreases in intercarrier compensation for the use of owned networks, increases in the cost for use of other providers' networks, and technologies such as Voice over Internet Protocol ("VoIP"). These challenges could have a material adverse effect on the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of TDS Telecom in the future.
Financial and operating highlights for 2010 include the following:
4
Telephone and Data Systems, Inc.
Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
TDS anticipates that TDS Telecom's future results will be affected by the following factors:
See "Results of OperationsWireline."
2011 Wireline Estimates
TDS Telecom's estimates of full-year 2011 results are shown below. Such estimates represent TDS Telecom's view as of the filing date of TDS' Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010. Such forward-looking statements should not be assumed to be accurate as of any future date. TDS undertakes no duty to update such information whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. There can be no assurance that final results will not differ materially from such estimated results.
|
2011 Estimated Results |
2010 Actual Results |
|||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ILEC and CLEC operations: |
|||||||
Operating revenues |
$780 - $810 million | $ | 795.8 million | ||||
Adjusted OIBDA(1) |
$260 - $290 million | $ | 275.0 million | ||||
Operating income |
$75 - $105 million | $ | 99.8 million | ||||
Depreciation, amortization and accretion expenses and losses on asset disposals and impairment of assets(2) |
Approx. $185 million | $ | 175.2 million | ||||
Capital expenditures(3) |
$175 - $200 million | $ | 157.3 million |
5
Telephone and Data Systems, Inc.
Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
accretion expenses and losses on asset disposals, and do not include any estimate for losses on impairment of assets since these cannot be predicted.
The foregoing estimates reflect the expectations of TDS Telecom's management considering its strategic plans and the current general economic conditions. In this challenging business environment, TDS Telecom will continue to focus on revenue growth through new service offerings as well as expense reduction through product cost improvement and process efficiencies. In order to achieve these objectives the company has allocated capital expenditures for:
In addition, TDS Telecom will fund its share for projects approved under the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 to increase broadband access in unserved areas. Under the Recovery Act, TDS Telecom will receive $105.1 million in federal grants and will provide $30.9 million of its own funds to complete 44 projects over the next 24 to 36 months.
Cash Flows and Investments
TDS and its subsidiaries had cash and cash equivalents totaling $368.1 million; short-term investments in the form of U.S. treasury securities, certificates of deposit and corporate notes aggregating $402.9 million; long-term investments in the form of U.S. treasury securities and corporate notes of $102.2 million; and borrowing capacity under their revolving credit facilities of $699.6 million as of December 31, 2010. Also, during 2010, TDS and its subsidiaries generated $1,121.9 million of cash flows from operating activities. Management believes that cash on hand, expected future cash flows from operating activities and sources of external financing provide substantial liquidity and financial flexibility and are sufficient to permit TDS and its subsidiaries to finance their contractual obligations and anticipated capital and operating expenditures for the foreseeable future.
In December 2010, TDS entered into a new $400 million revolving credit agreement and U.S. Cellular entered into a new $300 million revolving credit agreement with certain lenders and other parties. As a result, TDS' $400 million revolving credit agreement and U.S. Cellular's $300 million revolving credit agreement due to expire in June 2012 were terminated. TDS and U.S. Cellular entered into these new revolving credit agreements in order to obtain more favorable pricing, extended maturity and other terms and conditions.
In November 2010, TDS issued $225 million of 6.875% Senior Notes due 2059. In December 2010, the net proceeds of such offering were used to redeem $217.5 million of TDS' 7.6% Series A Notes due 2041, of which $500 million in aggregate principal amount were previously outstanding.
See "Financial Resources" and "Liquidity and Capital Resources" below for additional information related to cash flows, investments and revolving credit agreements.
6
Telephone and Data Systems, Inc.
Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
RESULTS OF OPERATIONSCONSOLIDATED
December 31,
|
2010 | Change | Percentage Change |
2009 | Change | Percentage Change |
2008 | |||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Operating revenues |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
U.S. Cellular |
$ | 4,177,681 | $ | (36,199 | ) | (1 | )% | $ | 4,213,880 | $ | (28,674 | ) | (1 | )% | $ | 4,242,554 | ||||||||||
TDS Telecom |
795,842 | 5,990 | 1 | % | 789,852 | (34,430 | ) | (4 | )% | 824,282 | ||||||||||||||||
All other(1) |
13,306 | (2,905 | ) | (18 | )% | 16,211 | (8,341 | ) | (34 | )% | 24,552 | |||||||||||||||
Total operating revenues |
4,986,829 | (33,114 | ) | (1 | )% | 5,019,943 | (71,445 | ) | (1 | )% | 5,091,388 | |||||||||||||||
Operating expenses |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
U.S. Cellular |
3,982,307 | 89,373 | 2 | % | 3,892,934 | (321,010 | ) | (8 | )% | 4,213,944 | ||||||||||||||||
TDS Telecom |
696,008 | (359 | ) | | 696,367 | 14,022 | 2 | % | 682,345 | |||||||||||||||||
All other(1) |
18,522 | (8,855 | ) | (32 | )% | 27,377 | (38,975 | ) | (59 | )% | 66,352 | |||||||||||||||
Total operating expenses |
4,696,837 | 80,159 | 2 | % | 4,616,678 | (345,963 | ) | (7 | )% | 4,962,641 | ||||||||||||||||
Operating income (loss) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
U.S. Cellular |
195,374 | (125,572 | ) | (39 | )% | 320,946 | 292,336 | >100 | % | 28,610 | ||||||||||||||||
TDS Telecom |
99,834 | 6,349 | 7 | % | 93,485 | (48,452 | ) | (34 | )% | 141,937 | ||||||||||||||||
All other(1) |
(5,216 | ) | 5,950 | 53 | % | (11,166 | ) | 30,634 | 73 | % | (41,800 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Total operating income |
289,992 | (113,273 | ) | (28 | )% | 403,265 | 274,518 | >100 | % | 128,747 | ||||||||||||||||
Other income and (expenses) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated entities |
98,074 | 7,342 | 8 | % | 90,732 | 920 | 1 | % | 89,812 | |||||||||||||||||
Interest and dividend income |
10,508 | (613 | ) | (6 | )% | 11,121 | (28,010 | ) | (72 | )% | 39,131 | |||||||||||||||
Interest expense |
(115,220 | ) | 10,989 | 9 | % | (126,209 | ) | 13,095 | 9 | % | (139,304 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Gain on investments and financial instruments |
| | N/M | | (31,595 | ) | N/M | 31,595 | ||||||||||||||||||
Other, net |
(2,089 | ) | (4,089 | ) | >100 | % | 2,000 | (213 | ) | (10 | )% | 2,213 | ||||||||||||||
Total other income (expenses) |
(8,727 | ) | 13,629 | 61 | % | (22,356 | ) | (45,803 | ) | >100 | % | 23,447 | ||||||||||||||
Income before income taxes |
281,265 |
(99,644 |
) |
(26 |
)% |
380,909 |
228,715 |
>100 |
% |
152,194 |
||||||||||||||||
Income tax expense |
92,283 | (41,517 | ) | (31 | )% | 133,800 | 99,501 | >100 | % | 34,299 | ||||||||||||||||
Net income |
188,982 |
(58,127 |
) |
(24 |
)% |
247,109 |
129,214 |
>100 |
% |
117,895 |
||||||||||||||||
Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests, net of tax |
(45,126 | ) | 13,018 | 22 | % | (58,144 | ) | (28,745 | ) | (98 | )% | (29,399 | ) | |||||||||||||
Net income attributable to TDS shareholders |
143,856 |
(45,109 |
) |
(24 |
)% |
188,965 |
100,469 |
>100 |
% |
88,496 |
||||||||||||||||
Preferred dividend requirement |
(50 | ) | 1 | 2 | % | (51 | ) | 1 | 2 | % | (52 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Net income available to common shareholders |
$ | 143,806 | $ | (45,108 | ) | (24 | )% | $ | 188,914 | $ | 100,470 | >100 | % | $ | 88,444 | |||||||||||
Basic earnings per share attributable to TDS shareholders |
$ | 1.37 | $ | (0.36 | ) | (21 | )% | $ | 1.73 | $ | 0.97 | >100 | % | $ | 0.76 | |||||||||||
Diluted earnings per share attributable to TDS shareholders |
$ | 1.36 | $ | (0.36 | ) | (21 | )% | $ | 1.72 | $ | 0.96 | >100 | % | $ | 0.76 |
N/MPercentage change not meaningful
7
Telephone and Data Systems, Inc.
Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Operating Revenues and Expenses
See "Results of OperationsWireless" and "Results of OperationsWireline" below for factors that affected Operating revenues and expenses.
Operating expenses included impairment losses on licenses held at U.S. Cellular in 2009 and 2008 and are discussed in "Results of OperationsWireless." An additional $27.7 million impairment loss on licenses was recognized at the TDS consolidated level in 2008 due to the fact that TDS accounted for U.S. Cellular's share repurchases as step acquisitions, allocating a portion of the repurchase value to TDS licenses, as required by GAAP in effect at that time.
The impacts of impairment losses related to licenses were as follows:
|
2010 | 2009 | 2008 | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
(Dollars in millions, except per share amounts) |
|
|||||||||
Net income attributable to TDS shareholders, excluding licenses impairments(1) |
$ | 143.9 | $ | 196.1 | $ | 297.7 | ||||
Loss on impairment of intangible assets related to licenses |
| (14.0 | ) | (414.4 | ) | |||||
Income tax and noncontrolling interest impact of licenses impairment(1) |
| 6.9 | 205.2 | |||||||
Impact of licenses impairments on Net income attributable to TDS shareholders(1) |
| (7.1 | ) | (209.2 | ) | |||||
Net income attributable to TDS shareholders |
$ | 143.9 | $ | 189.0 | $ | 88.5 | ||||
Diluted earnings per share attributable to TDS shareholders, excluding licenses impairments(1) |
$ | 1.36 | $ | 1.79 | $ | 2.56 | ||||
Impact of licenses impairments on Diluted earnings per share attributable to TDS shareholders(1) |
| (0.07 | ) | (1.80 | ) | |||||
Diluted earnings per share attributable to TDS shareholders |
$ | 1.36 | $ | 1.72 | $ | 0.76 | ||||
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated entities
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated entities represents TDS' share of net income from entities accounted for by the equity method. TDS generally follows the equity method of accounting for unconsolidated entities in which its ownership interest is less than or equal to 50% but equals or exceeds 20% for corporations and 3% for partnerships and limited liability companies.
TDS' investment in the Los Angeles SMSA Limited Partnership ("LA Partnership") contributed $64.8 million, $64.7 million and $66.1 million to Equity in earnings of unconsolidated entities in 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively. TDS received cash distributions from the LA Partnership of $66.0 million in each of 2010, 2009 and 2008.
Interest and dividend income
Interest income decreased $0.5 million in 2010 compared to 2009 and $18.0 million in 2009 compared to 2008. The average investment balances and weighted average return on investments remained relatively
8
Telephone and Data Systems, Inc.
Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
flat in 2010 compared to 2009. Lower average investment balances and lower weighted average return on investments in 2009 compared to 2008 contributed to that interest income decline. TDS' Cash and cash equivalents and Short-term investments are primarily held in money market funds, certificates of deposit, and government-backed securities.
Dividend income decreased by $0.1 million in 2010 and by $10.0 million in 2009 primarily due to a decrease in dividends from Deutsche Telekom Ordinary Shares. All of these shares were disposed of by 2008.
Interest expense
The decrease in interest expense in 2010 compared to 2009 was primarily attributable to the redemption of U.S. Cellular's 8.75% senior notes in December, 2009. The decrease in interest expense in 2009 compared to 2008 was primarily attributable to $12.0 million of interest incurred on variable prepaid forward contracts in 2008. Such forward contracts were settled in 2008.
Gain on investments and financial instruments
In 2008, Gain on investments and financial instruments consisted primarily of a $31.7 million gain realized upon the disposition of Rural Cellular Corporation Common Shares.
See Note 3Fair Value Measurements in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for more information on the gains and losses on investments and financial instruments.
Income tax expense
The effective tax rates on Income before income taxes and extraordinary item ("pre-tax income") for 2010, 2009 and 2008 were 32.8%, 35.1% and 22.5%, respectively. The following significant discrete and other items impacted income tax expense for these years:
2010Includes a tax benefit of $6.5 million resulting from favorable settlement of state income tax audits.
2009Includes a tax benefit of $8.4 million resulting from a state tax law change.
2008Includes tax benefits of $14.5 million and $7.4 million recorded upon the final disposition of the Deutsche Telekom Ordinary Shares and from a change in filing positions in certain states, respectively. The percentage impact of these items was magnified due to the 2008 Loss on impairment of intangible assets of $414.4 million, which decreased pre-tax income.
See Note 4Income Taxes in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for further information on the effective tax rate.
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests, net of tax
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests, net of tax includes the noncontrolling public shareholders' share of U.S. Cellular's net income, the noncontrolling shareholders' or partners' share of certain U.S. Cellular subsidiaries' net income or loss and other TDS noncontrolling interests.
Year Ended December 31,
|
2010 | 2009 | 2008 | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
|||||||||||
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest, net of tax |
||||||||||||
U.S. Cellular |
||||||||||||
Noncontrolling public shareholders' |
$ | (23,712 | ) | $ | (38,471 | ) | $ | (6,656 | ) | |||
Noncontrolling shareholders' or partners' |
(21,414 | ) | (19,673 | ) | (22,743 | ) | ||||||
|
$ | (45,126 | ) | $ | (58,144 | ) | $ | (29,399 | ) | |||
9
Telephone and Data Systems, Inc.
Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
RESULTS OF OPERATIONSWIRELESS
TDS provides wireless telephone service through U.S. Cellular, an 83%-owned subsidiary. U.S. Cellular owns, manages and invests in wireless markets throughout the United States.
Following is a table of summarized operating data for U.S. Cellular's consolidated operations.
As of December 31,(1)
|
2010 | 2009 | 2008 | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total market population of consolidated operating markets(2) |
46,546,000 | 46,306,000 | 46,009,000 | |||||||
Customers(3) |
6,072,000 | 6,141,000 | 6,196,000 | |||||||
Market penetration(2) |
13.0 | % | 13.3 | % | 13.5 | % | ||||
Total full-time equivalent employees(4) |
8,934 | 8,867 | 8,712 | |||||||
Cell sites in service |
7,645 | 7,279 | 6,877 | |||||||
Smartphone penetration(9)(10) |
16.7 | % | 7.5 | % | 3.7 | % |
For the Year Ended December 31,(5)
|
2010 | 2009 | 2008 | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Net retail customer additions (losses)(6) |
(15,000 | ) | 37,000 | 149,000 | ||||||
Net customer additions (losses)(6) |
(69,000 | ) | (55,000 | ) | 91,000 | |||||
Average monthly service revenue per customer(7) |
$ | 53.27 | $ | 52.99 | $ | 53.22 | ||||
Postpaid churn rate(8) |
1.5 | % | 1.6 | % | 1.5 | % | ||||
Smartphones sold as a percent of total devices sold(9) |
24.6 | % | 10.2 | % | 6.0 | % |
The total market population and penetration measures for consolidated operating markets apply to markets in which U.S. Cellular provides wireless service to customers. For comparison purposes, total market population and penetration related to all consolidated markets in which U.S. Cellular owns an interest were 90,468,000 and 6.7%, 89,712,000 and 6.8%, and 83,014,000 and 7.5% as of December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
|
2010 | 2009 | 2008 | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Customers on postpaid service plans in which the end user is a customer of U.S. Cellular ("postpaid customers") |
5,416,000 | 5,482,000 | 5,420,000 | |||||||
Customers on prepaid service plans in which the end user is a customer of U.S. Cellular ("prepaid customers") |
313,000 | 262,000 | 287,000 | |||||||
Total retail customers |
5,729,000 | 5,744,000 | 5,707,000 | |||||||
End user customers acquired through U.S. Cellular's agreements with third parties ("reseller customers") |
343,000 | 397,000 | 489,000 | |||||||
Total customers |
6,072,000 | 6,141,000 | 6,196,000 | |||||||
10
Telephone and Data Systems, Inc.
Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
|
2010 | 2009 | 2008 | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Service revenues per Consolidated Statement of Operations (000s) |
$ | 3,913,001 | $ | 3,927,128 | $ | 3,939,695 | ||||
Divided by total average customers during period (000s)* |
6,121 | 6,176 | 6,169 | |||||||
Divided by number of months in each period |
12 | 12 | 12 | |||||||
Average monthly service revenue per customer |
$ | 53.27 | $ | 52.99 | $ | 53.22 | ||||
11
Telephone and Data Systems, Inc.
Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Components of Operating Income
Year Ended December 31,
|
2010 | Increase/ (Decrease) |
Percentage Change |
2009 | Increase/ (Decrease) |
Percentage Change |
2008 | |||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Retail service |
$ | 3,459,546 | $ | (18,662 | ) | (1 | )% | $ | 3,478,208 | $ | 39,667 | 1 | % | $ | 3,438,541 | |||||||||
Inbound roaming |
253,290 | 515 | | 252,775 | (76,421 | ) | (23 | )% | 329,196 | |||||||||||||||
Other |
200,165 | 4,020 | 2 | % | 196,145 | 24,187 | 14 | % | 171,958 | |||||||||||||||
Service revenues |
3,913,001 | (14,127 | ) | | 3,927,128 | (12,567 | ) | | 3,939,695 | |||||||||||||||
Equipment sales |
264,680 | (22,072 | ) | (8 | )% | 286,752 | (16,107 | ) | (5 | )% | 302,859 | |||||||||||||
Total operating revenues |
4,177,681 | (36,199 | ) | (1 | )% | 4,213,880 | (28,674 | ) | (1 | )% | 4,242,554 | |||||||||||||
System operations (excluding Depreciation, amortization and accretion reported below) |
854,931 | 52,077 | 6 | % | 802,854 | 19,788 | 3 | % | 783,066 | |||||||||||||||
Cost of equipment sold |
742,981 | (12 | ) | | 742,993 | (413 | ) | | 743,406 | |||||||||||||||
Selling, general and administrative |
1,796,624 | 49,220 | 3 | % | 1,747,404 | 40,819 | 2 | % | 1,706,585 | |||||||||||||||
Depreciation, amortization and accretion |
577,054 | 7,540 | 1 | % | 569,514 | (7,307 | ) | (1 | )% | 576,821 | ||||||||||||||
Loss on impairment of intangible assets |
| (14,000 | ) | (100 | )% | 14,000 | (372,653 | ) | (96 | )% | 386,653 | |||||||||||||
Loss on asset disposals, net |
10,717 | (5,452 | ) | (34 | )% | 16,169 | (1,244 | ) | (7 | )% | 17,413 | |||||||||||||
Total operating expenses |
3,982,307 | 89,373 | 2 | % | 3,892,934 | (321,010 | ) | (8 | )% | 4,213,944 | ||||||||||||||
Operating income |
$ | 195,374 | $ | (125,572 | ) | (39 | )% | $ | 320,946 | $ | 292,336 | >100 | % | $ | 28,610 | |||||||||
Operating Revenues
Service revenues
Service revenues consist primarily of: (i) charges for access, airtime, roaming, recovery of regulatory costs and value-added services, including data products and services, provided to U.S. Cellular's retail customers and to end users through third-party resellers ("retail service"); (ii) charges to other wireless carriers whose customers use U.S. Cellular's wireless systems when roaming, including long-distance roaming ("inbound roaming"); and (iii) amounts received from the Federal USF.
Retail service revenues
The decrease in Retail service revenues in 2010 was primarily due to a decrease in U.S. Cellular's average customer base, partially offset by an increase in the average monthly retail service revenue per customer. The increase in 2009 was primarily due to an increase in average monthly retail service revenue per customer.
The average number of customers decreased to 6,121,000 in 2010 from 6,176,000 in 2009, driven by reductions in postpaid and reseller customers. The average number of customers in 2009 was relatively flat compared to 2008.
Average monthly retail service revenue per customer increased slightly to $47.10 in 2010 from $46.93 in 2009, and in 2009 increased 1% from $46.45 in 2008. The 2010 and 2009 increases in average monthly retail service revenue per customer include the impact of a reduction in the number of reseller customers, who typically generate lower average monthly revenues.
U.S. Cellular expects continued pressure on revenues in the foreseeable future due to industry competition for customers and related effects on pricing of service plan offerings.
As discussed in the Overview section above, on October 1, 2010, U.S. Cellular introduced The Belief Project, which allows customers selecting Belief Plans to earn loyalty reward points. U.S. Cellular will account for loyalty reward points under the deferred revenue method. Under this method, U.S. Cellular will allocate a portion of the revenue billed to customers under the Belief Plans to the loyalty reward points. The revenue allocated to these points will initially be deferred on the Consolidated Balance Sheet to be recognized in future periods when the loyalty reward points are redeemed or used. Application of the deferred revenue method of accounting related to loyalty reward points resulted in deferred revenues
12
Telephone and Data Systems, Inc.
Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
of $7.1 million in 2010. This amount is included in the Consolidated Balance Sheet at December 31, 2010 in Customer deposits and deferred revenues.
Inbound roaming revenues
Inbound roaming revenues were essentially flat in 2010 compared to 2009 as an increase in revenues from data roaming offset a decline in voice roaming revenues.
In 2009, the decrease in Inbound roaming revenues was primarily due to the decline in roaming revenues from the combined entity of Verizon and Alltel. In January 2009, Verizon acquired Alltel. As a result of this transaction, the network footprints of Verizon and Alltel were combined. This has resulted in a decrease in inbound roaming revenues for U.S. Cellular, since the combined Verizon and Alltel entity has reduced its usage of U.S. Cellular's network in certain coverage areas that were used by Verizon and Alltel (as separate entities). U.S. Cellular anticipates that inbound roaming revenues will increase in 2011 compared to 2010 due to the growth of data usage and voice minutes from U.S. Cellular's roaming partners that will more than offset expected decreases in voice and data rates.
Other revenues
Other revenues increased by $4.0 million, or 2%, in 2010 compared to 2009. A decrease in ETC revenues was offset by increases in other revenues from tower and spectrum leases. The decrease in ETC revenues in 2010 was primarily the result of a retroactive adjustment made by the Universal Service Administrative Company that resulted in a reduction of revenues of $3.6 million. The increase in Other revenues in 2009 compared to 2008 was primarily due to an increase in amounts that were received from the USF for states in which U.S. Cellular has been designated as an ETC. U.S. Cellular was eligible to receive ETC funds in sixteen states in 2010, 2009 and 2008. ETC revenues recorded in 2010, 2009 and 2008 were $143.9 million, $150.7 million and $134.1 million, respectively.
In May 2008, the FCC adopted a state-by-state temporary cap to funding for competitive ETCs based on the funding level available as of March 31, 2008. The cap has had the effect of reducing the amount of support that U.S. Cellular would otherwise have been eligible to receive. The cap funding level is undergoing revision because of the time lag in the reporting of costs by local exchange carriers which, under the "identical support rule," provides the amount of per line support that wireless ETCs are entitled to receive. This revision may further reduce funding under the cap and may result in a recapture of some payments that U.S. Cellular has received in excess of the cap. In October 2010, the FCC proposed creating a $100-300 million Mobility Fund to subsidize on a one time basis new wireless broadband development in unserved areas, with reverse auctions to award subsidies to low bidders. On February 8, 2011, the FCC issued a notice of proposed rulemaking to consider reform of the USF program in response to the issuance of the National Broadband Plan in March 2010. Creation of the Mobility Fund and adoption of a USF reform proposal by the FCC to transition support from voice networks to broadband networks could have a significantand adverse impact on the amount of support, if any, wireless ETCs continue to receive. As a result, U.S. Cellular's ETC revenues may decline significantly in future periods.
Equipment sales revenues
Equipment sales revenues include revenues from sales of wireless devices (handsets, modems and tablets) and related accessories to both new and existing customers, as well as revenues from sales of wireless devices and accessories to agents. All equipment sales revenues are recorded net of rebates.
U.S. Cellular strives to offer a competitive line of quality wireless devices to both new and existing customers. U.S. Cellular's customer acquisition and retention efforts include offering new wireless devices to customers at discounted prices; in addition, customers on the new Belief Plans receive loyalty reward points that may be used to purchase a new wireless device or accelerate the timing of a customer's eligibility for a wireless device upgrade at promotional pricing. U.S. Cellular also continues to
13
Telephone and Data Systems, Inc.
Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
sell wireless devices to agents; this practice enables U.S. Cellular to provide better control over the quality of wireless devices sold to its customers, establish roaming preferences and earn quantity discounts from wireless device manufacturers which are passed along to agents. U.S. Cellular anticipates that it will continue to sell wireless devices to agents in the future.
The decrease in 2010 equipment sales revenues was driven by declines of 5% in total wireless devices sold and a 5% decrease in average revenue per wireless device sold. Average revenue per wireless device sold declined due to aggressive promotional pricing across all categories of wireless devices. The decrease in 2009 equipment sales revenues was driven by a decline of 8% in average revenue per wireless device sold due to aggressive promotional pricing across all categories of wireless devices, partially offset by an increase in the total number of wireless devices sold.
Operating Expenses
System operations expenses (excluding Depreciation, amortization and accretion)
System operations expenses (excluding Depreciation, amortization and accretion) include charges from telecommunications service providers for U.S. Cellular's customers' use of their facilities, costs related to local interconnection to the wireline network, charges for maintenance of U.S. Cellular's network, long-distance charges, outbound roaming expenses and payments to third-party data product and platform developers.
Key components of the overall increases in system operations expenses were as follows:
U.S. Cellular expects total system operations expenses to increase on a year-over-year basis in the foreseeable future to support the continued growth in cell sites and other network facilities as it continues to add capacity, enhance quality and deploy new technologies as well as to support increases in total customer usage, particularly data usage.
Cost of equipment sold
Cost of equipment sold remained relatively flat in 2010 compared to 2009. A decline in total wireless devices sold of 5% was offset by a 5% increase in the average cost per wireless device sold due to a shift in the mix of sales to wireless devices with expanded capabilities, such as smartphones.
Cost of equipment sold remained relatively flat in 2009 compared to 2008. A reduction in the average cost per wireless device sold, reflecting lower overall purchase costs, was offset by an increase in the total number of wireless devices sold.
U.S. Cellular's loss on equipment, defined as equipment sales revenues less cost of equipment sold, was $478.3 million, $456.2 million and $440.5 million for 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively. U.S. Cellular
14
Telephone and Data Systems, Inc.
Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
expects loss on equipment to continue to be a significant cost in the foreseeable future as wireless carriers continue to use device availability and pricing as a means of competitive differentiation. In addition, U.S. Cellular expects increasing sales of data centric wireless devices such as smartphones and tablets to result in higher equipment subsidies over time; these devices generally have higher purchase costs which cannot be recovered through proportionately higher selling prices to customers.
Selling, general and administrative expenses
Selling, general and administrative expenses include salaries, commissions and expenses of field sales and retail personnel and facilities; telesales department salaries and expenses; agent commissions and related expenses; corporate marketing and merchandise management; and advertising expenses. Selling, general and administrative expenses also include bad debts expense, costs of operating customer care centers and corporate expenses.
Key components of the net increases in Selling, general and administrative expenses were as follows:
2010
2009
U.S. Cellular expects Selling, general and administrative expenses to increase on a year-over-year basis driven primarily by increases in expenses associated with acquiring, serving and retaining customers, as well as costs related to its multi-year initiatives.
Depreciation, amortization and accretion
Depreciation, amortization and accretion remained relatively flat in 2010, 2009 and 2008.
See "Financial Resources" and "Liquidity and Capital Resources" for a discussion of U.S. Cellular's capital expenditures.
15
Telephone and Data Systems, Inc.
Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Loss on impairment of intangible assets
There was no impairment of intangible assets in 2010.
U.S. Cellular recognized impairment losses on licenses of $14.0 million and $386.7 million in 2009 and 2008, respectively. The impairment losses in 2009 were as a result of the annual impairment assessment of licenses and goodwill performed during the fourth quarter of 2009. The 2008 impairment loss was attributable to the deterioration in the credit and financial markets and the accelerated decline in the overall economy in the fourth quarter of 2008. These factors impacted U.S. Cellular's calculation of the estimated fair value of licenses in the fourth quarter of 2008 through the use of a higher discount rate when projecting future cash flows and lower than previously projected earnings in the wireless industry.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONSWIRELINE
TDS operates its wireline operations through TDS Telecom, a wholly owned subsidiary. The following table summarizes operating data for TDS Telecom's ILEC and CLEC operations:
As of December 31,
|
2010 | 2009 | 2008 | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ILEC |
|||||||||||
Equivalent access lines(1) |
767,200 | 775,900 | 776,700 | ||||||||
Physical access lines(2) |
507,700 | 536,300 | 566,200 | ||||||||
High-speed data customers |
227,700 | 208,300 | 178,300 | ||||||||
managedIP stations |
3,600 | 1,900 | 600 | ||||||||
Long-distance customers |
370,100 | 362,800 | 347,000 | ||||||||
CLEC |
|||||||||||
Equivalent access lines(3) |
335,400 | 355,900 | 393,000 | ||||||||
High-speed data customers |
33,100 | 36,900 | 40,800 | ||||||||
managedIP stations |
23,800 | 12,000 | 2,100 | ||||||||
Full-time equivalent TDS Telecom employees |
2,537 | 2,547 | 2,703 |
16
Telephone and Data Systems, Inc.
Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
TDS Telecom
Components of Operating Income
Year Ended December 31,
|
2010 | Change | Percentage Change |
2009 | Change | Percentage Change |
2008 | |||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Operating revenues |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
ILEC revenues |
$ | 617,394 | $ | 17,867 | 3 | % | $ | 599,527 | $ | (11,507 | ) | (2 | )% | $ | 611,034 | |||||||||
CLEC revenues |
187,984 | (11,391 | ) | (6 | )% | 199,375 | (20,627 | ) | (9 | )% | 220,002 | |||||||||||||
Intra-company elimination |
(9,536 | ) | (486 | ) | (5 | )% | (9,050 | ) | (2,296 | ) | (34 | )% | (6,754 | ) | ||||||||||
TDS Telecom operating revenues |
795,842 | 5,990 | 1 | % | 789,852 | (34,430 | ) | (4 | )% | 824,282 | ||||||||||||||
Operating expenses |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
ILEC expenses |
519,462 | 10,065 | 2 | % | 509,397 | 22,676 | 5 | % | 486,721 | |||||||||||||||
CLEC expenses |
186,082 | (9,938 | ) | (5 | )% | 196,020 | (6,358 | ) | (3 | )% | 202,378 | |||||||||||||
Intra-company elimination |
(9,536 | ) | (486 | ) | (5 | )% | (9,050 | ) | (2,296 | ) | (34 | )% | (6,754 | ) | ||||||||||
TDS Telecom operating expenses |
696,008 | (359 | ) | | 696,367 | 14,022 | 2 | % | 682,345 | |||||||||||||||
TDS Telecom operating income |
$ | 99,834 | $ | 6,349 | 7 | % | $ | 93,485 | $ | (48,452 | ) | (34 | )% | $ | 141,937 | |||||||||
ILEC Operations
Components of Operating Income
Year Ended December 31,
|
2010 | Change | Percentage Change | 2009 | Change | Percentage Change | 2008 | ||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Operating revenues |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Voice revenues |
$ | 179,539 | $ | (7,684 | ) | (4 | )% | $ | 187,223 | $ | (16,149 | ) | (8 | )% | $ | 203,372 | |||||||
Data revenues |
126,029 | 22,347 | 22 | % | 103,682 | 13,623 | 15 | % | 90,059 | ||||||||||||||
Network access revenues |
271,964 | 688 | | 271,276 | (7,208 | ) | (3 | )% | 278,484 | ||||||||||||||
Miscellaneous revenues |
39,862 | 2,516 | 7 | % | 37,346 | (1,773 | ) | (5 | )% | 39,119 | |||||||||||||
Total operating revenues |
617,394 | 17,867 | 3 | % | 599,527 | (11,507 | ) | (2 | )% | 611,034 | |||||||||||||
Operating expenses |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Cost of services and products (excluding depreciation, amortization and accretion reported below) |
196,298 | 2,268 | 1 | % | 194,030 | 9,745 | 5 | % | 184,285 | ||||||||||||||
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
173,020 | 2,515 | 1 | % | 170,505 | 3,470 | 2 | % | 167,035 | ||||||||||||||
Depreciation, amortization and accretion |
149,375 | 6,462 | 5 | % | 142,913 | 7,978 | 6 | % | 134,935 | ||||||||||||||
Loss on asset disposals, net |
769 | (1,180 | ) | (61 | )% | 1,949 | 1,483 | >100 | % | 466 | |||||||||||||
Total operating expenses |
519,462 | 10,065 | 2 | % | 509,397 | 22,676 | 5 | % | 486,721 | ||||||||||||||
Total operating income |
$ | 97,932 | $ | 7,802 | 9 | % | $ | 90,130 | $ | (34,183 | ) | (27 | )% | $ | 124,313 | ||||||||
Operating Revenues
Voice revenues (charges for the provision of local telephone exchange service and reselling long-distance service).
The decreases in Voice revenues in 2010 and 2009 were primarily driven by 6% declines in the average physical access lines served in both years, which negatively impacted local service revenues by $8.3 million and $10.6 million, respectively. Additionally, local service and long-distance revenues decreased $2.9 million and $9.9 million in 2010 and 2009, respectively, due to discounts attributed to bundled offerings, which encourage customers to take multiple products at a reduced price.
Acquisitions added $1.3 million and $2.6 million to Voice revenues in 2010 and 2009, respectively.
17
Telephone and Data Systems, Inc.
Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Data revenues (charges for providing Internet and other data related services).
The growth in Data revenues in 2010 and in 2009 was primarily due to growth in average high-speed data customers of 12% and 18% in 2010 and 2009, respectively. These additional customers resulted in increased revenues of $11.3 million in 2010 and $13.7 million in 2009. Increase in usage of other data products increased revenues by $2.0 million in 2010 and $1.6 million in 2009. These increases were partially offset by decreases in dial-up Internet customers which decreased Data revenues $2.9 million and $4.0 million in 2010 and 2009, respectively.
Acquisitions added $11.3 million and $1.4 million to Data revenues in 2010 and 2009, respectively. Revenues from the Hosted and Managed Service companies are included in data revenues.
Network access revenues (compensation from other telecommunication carriers for carrying long-distance traffic on TDS Telecom's local telephone network and for local interconnection).
Network access revenues increased by $2.0 million in 2010 primarily due to an increase in expenses recoverable through inter-state regulatory recovery mechanisms. Acquisitions also added $2.6 million to Network access revenues in 2010. Partially offsetting these increases was a $3.0 million decrease in 2010 from 2009 due to a decline in intra-state minutes of use of 5%. Network access revenues also decreased comparatively in 2010 due to the settlement of the National Exchange Carrier Association's interstate revenue pools for the years 2003 through 2006 which contributed $1.7 million to revenues in 2009.
Network access revenues decreased $7.0 million in 2009 from 2008 due to a decline in intra-state minutes of use of 12%. Network access revenues declined $1.6 million primarily due to a decrease in expenses recoverable through inter-state regulatory recovery mechanisms. The settlement of the National Exchange Carrier Association's interstate revenue pools for the years 2003 through 2006 partially offset these declines by contributing $1.7 million to 2009 revenues. Acquisitions added $5.3 million to Access revenues in 2009.
Miscellaneous revenues (charges for selling direct broadcast satellite service and leasing, selling, installing and maintaining customer premise equipment as well as other miscellaneous services).
Miscellaneous revenues increased $3.6 million in 2010 due to satellite and video revenues. Declines in business systems sales reduced Miscellaneous revenues $1.8 million in 2010 and $4.3 million in 2009.
Acquisitions added $0.4 million and $0.9 million to Miscellaneous revenues in 2010 and 2009, respectively.
Operating Expenses
Cost of services and products
The increase in Cost of services and products expense in 2010 was primarily the result of $6.2 million of expense from acquisitions. Labor related expense including employee and contractor charges decreased $6.5 million due to workforce reduction initiatives.
The increase in Cost of services and products in 2009 was primarily driven by the increased offering of incentives to attract new customers of $3.0 million and increased circuit bandwidth to support the growth in high-speed data products of $4.9 million. Acquisitions also added $3.5 million to Cost of services and products in 2009.
Selling, general and administrative expenses
The increase in Selling, general and administrative expenses in 2010 was primarily the result of $5.6 million of expense from acquisitions. Other Selling, general and administrative expenses increased $1.9 million due to higher Universal Service Funding rates, and $1.2 million in legal and consulting costs incurred to complete the acquisitions. A discrete expense of $1.6 million was also recorded in 2010 for
18
Telephone and Data Systems, Inc.
Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
an asset loss for which an insurance claim has been filed. Offsetting these increases was the impact of workforce reductions made in 2009 including employee compensation modifications, which decreased employee costs by $6.8 million in 2010.
The increase in Selling, general and administrative expenses in 2009 was primarily due to an increase of $3.1 million in legal, sales and excise tax expenses arising from discrete matters and severance of $1.8 million as a result of workforce reduction. Partially offsetting these charges were discrete events related to employee compensation modifications which reduced expenses $2.0 million. Also partially offsetting these increases were decreases in property taxes of $1.6 million, as well as a reduction in bad debts expense of $1.1 million. Acquisitions added $2.8 million to Selling, general and administrative expense in 2009.
Depreciation, amortization and accretion expense
ILEC acquisitions increased depreciation, amortization and accretion expense $4.7 million and $4.5 million in 2010 and 2009, respectively.
CLEC Operations
Components of Operating Income
Year Ended December 31,
|
2010 | Change | Percentage Change |
2009 | Change | Percentage Change |
2008 | |||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Retail revenues |
$ | 168,347 | $ | (10,264 | ) | (6 | )% | $ | 178,611 | $ | (18,286 | ) | (9 | )% | $ | 196,897 | ||||||
Wholesale revenues |
19,637 | (1,127 | ) | (5 | )% | 20,764 | (2,341 | ) | (10 | )% | 23,105 | |||||||||||
Total operating revenues |
187,984 | (11,391 | ) | (6 | )% | 199,375 | (20,627 | ) | (9 | )% | 220,002 | |||||||||||
Cost of services and products (excluding depreciation, amortization and accretion reported below) |
96,934 | (7,123 | ) | (7 | )% | 104,057 | (5,400 | ) | (5 | )% | 109,457 | |||||||||||
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
64,107 | (3,001 | ) | (4 | )% | 67,108 | (1,991 | ) | (3 | )% | 69,099 | |||||||||||
Depreciation, amortization and accretion |
24,679 | 276 | 1 | % | 24,403 | 972 | 4 | % | 23,431 | |||||||||||||
Loss on asset disposals, net |
362 | (90 | ) | (20 | )% | 452 | 61 | 16 | % | 391 | ||||||||||||
Total operating expenses |
186,082 | (9,938 | ) | (5 | )% | 196,020 | (6,358 | ) | (3 | )% | 202,378 | |||||||||||
Total operating income |
$ | 1,902 | $ | (1,453 | ) | (43 | )% | $ | 3,355 | $ | (14,269 | ) | (81 | )% | $ | 17,624 | ||||||
Operating Revenues
Retail revenues (charges to CLEC customers for the provision of direct telecommunication services).
Average CLEC equivalent access lines in service decreased 8% in 2010 and 10% in 2009, which resulted in decreases in Retail revenues of $12.8 million and $19.4 million, respectively. Average residential equivalent access lines decreased 24% in 2010 and 26% in 2009 as the CLEC operation continues to implement its strategic shift towards serving primarily a commercial subscriber base. The average equivalent access lines related to commercial customers declined 3% and 4% for the same periods. Average revenue per subscriber increased in both 2010 and 2009 resulting in higher revenues of $2.5 million and $1.1 million, respectively.
Wholesale revenues (charges to other carriers for utilizing TDS Telecom's network infrastructure).
An 18% reduction in minutes of use resulted in a $2.5 million decrease to Wholesale revenues in 2010 which was partially offset by a $1.1 million increase in special access revenues. The decline in Wholesale
19
Telephone and Data Systems, Inc.
Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
revenues in 2009 was similarly driven by a 27% reduction in minutes of use partially offset by an increase in average rates resulting from a more favorable mixture of traffic carried.
Operating Expenses
Cost of services and products
Cost of services decreased by $6.5 million and $7.0 million in 2010 and 2009, respectively, due to reductions in purchased network services, which have been driven by the decline in the residential customer base. The decrease in 2009 was partially offset by additional expenses of $1.6 million associated with the provisioning of managed Internet Protocol service to customers.
Selling, general and administrative expenses
Selling, general and administrative expenses decreased in 2010 primarily due to a $1.0 million reduction in employee related expenses and a $0.8 million reduction in sales and marketing promotions.
Selling, general and administrative expenses decreased in 2009 primarily due to decreased Universal Service Fund contribution expense of $1.3 million caused by the decreased customer base.
Management believes that inflation affects TDS' business to no greater or lesser extent than the general economy.
RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
In general, recent accounting pronouncements did not have and are not expected to have a significant effect on TDS' financial condition and results of operations.
See Note 1Summary of Significant Accounting Policies and Recent Accounting Pronouncements in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for information on recent accounting pronouncements.
20
Telephone and Data Systems, Inc.
Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
TDS operates a capital- and marketing-intensive business. TDS utilizes cash from its operating activities, cash proceeds from divestitures and disposition of investments, short-term credit facilities, long-term debt financing and cash on hand to fund its acquisitions (including licenses), construction costs, operating expenses and share repurchases. Cash flows may fluctuate from quarter to quarter and year to year due to seasonality, the timing of acquisitions, capital expenditures and other factors. The table below and the following discussion in this Financial Resources section summarize TDS' cash flow activities in 2010, 2009 and 2008.
|
2010 | 2009 | 2008 | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
||||||||||
Cash flows from (used in) |
|||||||||||
Operating activities |
$ | 1,121,945 | $ | 1,102,594 | $ | 848,892 | |||||
Investing activities |
(1,223,848 | ) | (781,446 | ) | (902,752 | ) | |||||
Financing activities |
(200,955 | ) | (427,465 | ) | (343,277 | ) | |||||
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents |
$ | (302,858 | ) | $ | (106,317 | ) | $ | (397,137 | ) | ||
Cash Flows from Operating Activities
The following table presents Adjusted OIBDA and is included for purposes of analyzing changes in operating activities. TDS believes this measure provides useful information to investors regarding TDS' financial condition and results of operations because it highlights certain key cash and non-cash items and their impacts on cash flows from operating activities:
|
2010 | 2009 | 2008 | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
||||||||||
Operating income |
$ | 289,992 | $ | 403,265 | $ | 128,747 | |||||
Non-cash items |
|||||||||||
Depreciation, amortization and accretion |
761,748 | 748,826 | 749,967 | ||||||||
Loss on impairment of intangible assets |
| 14,000 | 414,376 | ||||||||
Loss on asset disposals, net |
11,763 | 18,758 | 18,331 | ||||||||
Adjusted OIBDA(1) |
$ | 1,063,503 | $ | 1,184,849 | $ | 1,311,421 | |||||
21
Telephone and Data Systems, Inc.
Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Cash flows from operating activities in 2010 were $1,121.9 million, an increase of $19.4 million from 2009. Significant changes included the following:
Cash flows from operating activities in 2009 were $1,102.6 million, an increase of $253.7 million from 2008. Significant changes included the following:
22
Telephone and Data Systems, Inc.
Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Cash Flows from Investing Activities
TDS makes substantial investments to acquire wireless licenses and properties and to construct, operate and upgrade modern high-quality communications networks and facilities as a basis for creating long-term value for shareholders. In recent years, rapid changes in technology and new opportunities have required substantial investments in potentially revenue-enhancing and cost-reducing upgrades to TDS' networks.
Cash used for property, plant and equipment and system development expenditures totaled $755.0 million in 2010, $671.2 million in 2009 and $734.9 million in 2008. These expenditures were made to provide for customer and usage growth, to upgrade service and to take advantage of service-enhancing and cost-reducing technological developments in order to maintain competitive services.
Acquisitions required cash payments of $81.7 million in 2010, $29.3 million in 2009 and $389.2 million in 2008, respectively, as summarized below:
Cash Payment for Acquisitions(1)
|
2010 | 2009 | 2008 | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
|||||||||
Auction 73 licenses(2) |
$ | | $ | | $ | 300.5 | ||||
All other U.S. Cellular licenses |
17.1 | 15.8 | 32.3 | |||||||
Business acquisitions |
64.6 | 13.2 | 56.3 | |||||||
Other |
| 0.3 | 0.1 | |||||||
Total |
$ | 81.7 | $ | 29.3 | $ | 389.2 | ||||
In 2010, TDS invested $493.8 million in U.S. treasuries and corporate notes with maturities of greater than three months from the acquisition date. TDS invested $109.2 million and $27.4 million in certificates of deposit ("CDs") in 2009 and 2008, respectively. TDS realized cash proceeds of $106.3 million in 2010 related to the maturities of its investments in U.S. treasuries, corporate notes and CDs. Also, cash proceeds of $23.7 million were received in 2009 from redemption of certain CDs.
23
Telephone and Data Systems, Inc.
Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
TDS realized cash proceeds of $226.6 million in 2008 from the sale of Deutsche Telekom Ordinary Shares offset by $17.4 million in cash payments to settle the collar portion of certain variable prepaid forward contracts related to such shares. TDS settled these variable prepaid forward contracts through both the delivery of Deutsche Telekom Ordinary Shares and cash. In addition, in 2008, TDS realized cash proceeds of $32.4 million from the disposition of Rural Cellular Corporation ("RCC") Common Shares held by TDS in conjunction with Verizon Wireless' acquisition of RCC.
Cash Flows from Financing Activities
Cash flows from financing activities primarily reflect issuances and repayments on revolving credit facilities, proceeds from issuance of long-term debt, cash used for repayments of long-term debt, distributions to noncontrolling interests, repurchases of TDS and U.S. Cellular shares, and cash proceeds from reissuance of common shares pursuant to stock-based compensation plans. TDS has used short-term debt to finance acquisitions, to repurchase shares and for other general corporate purposes. Cash flows from operating activities and, from time to time, the sale of non-strategic wireless and other investments have been used to reduce debt.
TDS' payment to settle the debt portion of certain variable prepaid forward contracts related to Deutsche Telekom Ordinary Shares totaled $47.4 million in 2008. All variable prepaid forward contracts were settled in 2008.
There were no short-term borrowings or repayments during 2010 or 2009. Borrowings and repayments in 2008 under the revolving credit facilities totaled $100.0 million.
In November 2010, TDS issued $225.0 million aggregate principal amount of 6.875% Senior Notes due in 2059. In December 2010, TDS redeemed $217.5 million aggregate principal amount of the outstanding $500 million aggregate principal amount of its 7.6% Series A Senior Notes due 2041. The redemption price of $222 million was 100% of the outstanding aggregate principal amount, plus accrued and unpaid interest thereon until the redemption date. The redemption was financed with the net proceeds from the issuance of $225 million in aggregate principal amount of TDS' 6.875% Senior Notes.
In 2009, U.S. Cellular redeemed its outstanding 8.75% senior notes for their principal amount of $130.0 million and retired its 9% installment notes payable in the amount of $10.0 million. There were no redemptions of long-term debt in 2008.
TDS repurchased Special Common Shares and Common Shares for $68.1 million, $176.6 million and $199.6 million in 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively. Of the amount repurchased in 2008, a total of $197.7 million was paid in cash before December 31, 2008 and $1.9 million was paid in January 2009. U.S. Cellular repurchased Common Shares for $52.8 million, $33.6 million and $32.9 million in 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively. U.S. Cellular also received $4.6 million in 2008 from an investment banking firm for the final settlement of Accelerated Share Repurchases ("ASR") made in 2007. See Note 15Common Stockholders' Equity in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information related to these transactions.
24
Telephone and Data Systems, Inc.
Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Free Cash Flow
The following table presents Free cash flow. TDS believes that Free cash flow as reported by TDS may be useful to investors and other users of its financial information in evaluating the amount of cash generated by business operations, after capital expenditures.
|
2010 | 2009 | 2008 | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
|
|
|||||||
Cash flows from operating activities |
$ | 1,121,945 | $ | 1,102,594 | $ | 848,892 | ||||
Capital expenditures |
(755,032 | ) | (671,165 | ) | (734,923 | ) | ||||
Free cash flow(1) |
$ | 366,913 | $ | 431,429 | $ | 113,969 | ||||
See Cash flows from Operating Activities and Cash flows from Investing Activities for details on the changes to the components of Free cash flow.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
TDS believes that existing cash and investments balances, expected cash flows from operating activities and funds available under its revolving credit facilities provide substantial liquidity and financial flexibility for TDS to meet its normal financing needs (including working capital, construction and development expenditures and share repurchases under approved programs) for the foreseeable future. In addition, TDS and its subsidiaries may have access to public and private capital markets to help meet their financing needs.
Consumer spending significantly impacts TDS' operations and performance. Factors that influence levels of consumer spending include: unemployment rates, increases in fuel and other energy costs, conditions in residential real estate and mortgage markets, labor and health care costs, access to credit, consumer confidence and other macroeconomic factors. Changes in these and other economic factors could have a material adverse effect on demand for TDS' products and services and on TDS' financial condition and results of operations.
TDS cannot provide assurances that circumstances that could have a material adverse effect on its liquidity or capital resources will not occur. Economic conditions, changes in financial markets or other factors could restrict TDS' liquidity and availability of financing on terms and prices acceptable to TDS, which could require TDS to reduce its construction, development, acquisition or share repurchase programs. Such reductions could have a material adverse effect on TDS' business, financial condition or results of operations.
Cash and Cash Equivalents
At December 31, 2010, TDS had $368.1 million in cash and cash equivalents, which included cash and short-term, highly liquid investments with original maturities of three months or less. The primary objective of TDS' cash and cash equivalents investment activities is to preserve principal. At December 31, 2010, the majority of TDS' cash and cash equivalents was held in money market funds that invest exclusively in U.S. Treasury securities or in repurchase agreements fully collateralized by such obligations. TDS monitors the financial viability of the money market funds and direct investments in which it invests and believes that the credit risk associated with these investments is low.
25
Telephone and Data Systems, Inc.
Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Short-term and Long-term Investments
At December 31, 2010, TDS had $402.9 million in Short-term investments and $102.2 million in Long-term investments. Short-term and Long-term investments consist of certificates of deposit (short-term only), U.S. treasuries and corporate notes, all of which are designated as held-to-maturity investments, and are recorded at amortized cost in the Consolidated Balance Sheet. The corporate notes are guaranteed by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. For these investments, TDS' objective is to earn a higher rate of return on funds that are not anticipated to be required to meet liquidity needs in the near term, while maintaining a low level of investment risk. See Note 3Fair Value Measurements in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional details on Short-term and Long-term investments.
Revolving Credit Facilities
TDS and U.S. Cellular have revolving credit facilities available for general corporate purposes. On December 17, 2010, TDS entered into a new $400 million revolving credit agreement with certain lenders and other parties and U.S. Cellular entered into a new $300 million revolving credit agreement with certain lenders and other parties. Amounts under both of the new revolving credit facilities may be borrowed, repaid and reborrowed from time to time until maturity in December 2015. At December 31, 2010, there were no outstanding borrowings and $0.2 million of outstanding letters of credit, leaving $399.8 million available for use under the TDS revolving credit facility, and there were no outstanding borrowings and $0.2 million of outstanding letters of credit, leaving $299.8 million available for use under the U.S. Cellular revolving credit facility. In connection with U.S. Cellular's new revolving credit facility, TDS and U.S. Cellular entered into a subordination agreement dated December 17, 2010 together with the administrative agent for the lenders under U.S. Cellular's new revolving credit facility. At December 31, 2010, no U.S. Cellular debt was subordinated pursuant to this subordination agreement.
TDS' and U.S. Cellular's interest cost on their new revolving credit facilities is subject to increase if their current credit ratings from nationally recognized credit rating agencies are lowered, and is subject to decrease if the ratings are raised. The credit facilities would not cease to be available nor would the maturity date accelerate solely as a result of a downgrade in TDS' or U.S. Cellular's credit rating. However, a downgrade in TDS' or U.S. Cellular's credit rating could adversely affect their ability to renew the credit facilities or obtain access to other credit facilities in the future.
During 2010, TDS' and U.S. Cellular's credit ratings were downgraded from BBB+ to BBB by Fitch Ratings. As of December 31, 2010, TDS' and U.S. Cellular's credit ratings from the nationally recognized credit rating agencies remained at investment grade.
The continued availability of the new revolving credit facilities requires TDS and U.S. Cellular to comply with certain negative and affirmative covenants, maintain certain financial ratios and make representations regarding certain matters at the time of each borrowing. TDS and U.S. Cellular believe they were in compliance as of December 31, 2010 with all of the covenants and requirements set forth in their new revolving credit facilities.
Long-Term Financing
TDS and its subsidiaries had the following public debt outstanding as of December 31, 2010:
Telephone and Data Systems, Inc. (Parent):
26
Telephone and Data Systems, Inc.
Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
SubsidiariesU.S. Cellular:
TDS and its subsidiaries' long-term debt and indentures do not contain any provisions resulting in acceleration of the maturities of outstanding debt in the event of a change in TDS' credit rating. However, a downgrade in TDS' credit rating could adversely affect its ability to obtain long-term debt financing in the future. TDS believes it and its subsidiaries were in compliance as of December 31, 2010 with all covenants and other requirements set forth in long-term debt indentures. TDS and U.S. Cellular have not failed to make nor do they expect to fail to make any scheduled payment of principal or interest under such indentures.
The long-term debt principal payments due for the next five years represent less than 1% of the total long-term debt obligation at December 31, 2010. Refer to Market RiskLong-Term Debt for additional information regarding required principal payments and the weighted average interest rates related to TDS' long-term debt.
TDS, at its discretion, may from time to time seek to retire or purchase its outstanding debt through cash purchases and/or exchanges for other securities, in open market purchases, privately negotiated transactions, tender offers, exchange offers or otherwise. Such repurchases or exchanges, if any, will depend on prevailing market conditions, liquidity requirements, contractual restrictions and other factors. The amounts involved may be material.
TDS and U.S. Cellular each have effective shelf registration statements on Form S-3 that they can use to issue senior debt securities that can be used for general corporate purposes, including to finance the redemption of any of the above existing debt. The TDS shelf registration statement is an automatic shelf registration that permits TDS to issue at any time and from time to time, senior debt securities in one or more offerings in an indeterminate amount. The U.S. Cellular shelf registration statement permits U.S. Cellular to issue at any time and from time to time, senior debt securities in one or more offerings up to an aggregate principal amount of $500,000,000. The ability of TDS or U.S. Cellular to complete an offering pursuant to such shelf registration statements is subject to market conditions and other factors at the time.
Capital Expenditures
U.S. Cellular's capital expenditures for 2011 are expected to be approximately $650 million. These expenditures are expected to be for the following general purposes:
27
Telephone and Data Systems, Inc.
Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
TDS Telecom's anticipated capital expenditures for 2011 are expected to be $175-$200 million. These expenditures are expected to be for the following general purposes:
TDS plans to finance its construction program for 2011 using cash flows from operating activities, existing cash balances, and, if necessary, short-term debt.
Acquisitions, Divestitures and Exchanges
TDS assesses its existing wireless and wireline interests on an ongoing basis with a goal of improving the competitiveness of its operations and maximizing its long-term return on investment. As part of this strategy, TDS reviews attractive opportunities to acquire additional wireless operating markets, telecommunications companies, wireless spectrum and related service businesses, such as Hosted and Managed Services businesses. In addition, TDS may seek to divest outright or include in exchanges for other wireless interests those wireless interests that are not strategic to its long-term success. TDS also from time to time may be engaged in negotiations relating to the acquisition, divestiture or exchange of companies, strategic properties or wireless spectrum. In general, TDS may not disclose such transactions until there is a definitive agreement. See Note 7Acquisitions, Divestitures and Exchanges in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for details on significant transactions in 2010, 2009 and 2008.
Variable Interest Entities
TDS consolidates certain entities because they are "variable interest entities" under accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America ("GAAP"). See Note 5Variable Interest Entities in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for the details of these variable interest entities. TDS may elect to make additional capital contributions and/or advances to these variable interest entities in future periods in order to fund their operations.
Share Repurchase Programs
TDS and U.S. Cellular have repurchased and expect to continue to repurchase their Special Common Shares (TDS only) and Common Shares, subject to repurchase programs. For additional information related to the current TDS and U.S. Cellular repurchase authorizations and repurchases made during 2010, 2009 and 2008, see Note 15Common Stockholders' Equity in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
28
Telephone and Data Systems, Inc.
Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Contractual and Other Obligations
At December 31, 2010, the resources required for contractual obligations were as follows:
|
Payments Due by Period |
|||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
(Dollars in millions) |
Total | Less Than 1 Year |
2 - 3 Years | 4 - 5 Years | More Than 5 Years |
|||||||||||
Long-term debt obligations(1) |
$ | 1,507.1 | $ | 1.3 | $ | 5.2 | $ | 1.8 | $ | 1,498.8 | ||||||
Interest payments on long-term debt obligations |
3,106.8 | 106.3 | 212.0 | 211.8 | 2,576.7 | |||||||||||
Operating leases(2) |
1,239.7 | 155.6 | 245.6 | 152.6 | 685.9 | |||||||||||
Capital leases |
9.0 | 0.8 | 1.2 | 1.2 | 5.8 | |||||||||||
Purchase obligations(3)(4) |
855.8 | 459.9 | 268.9 | 74.4 | 52.6 | |||||||||||
|
$ | 6,718.4 | $ | 723.9 | $ | 732.9 | $ | 441.8 | $ | 4,819.8 | ||||||
The table above excludes liabilities related to "unrecognized tax benefits" as defined by GAAP because TDS is unable to predict the period of settlement of such liabilities. Such unrecognized tax benefits were $34.0 million at December 31, 2010. See Note 4Income Taxes in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information on unrecognized tax benefits.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
TDS has no transactions, agreements or other contractual arrangements with unconsolidated entities involving "off-balance sheet arrangements," as defined by Securities and Exchange Commission rules, that have or are reasonably likely to have a material current or future effect on its financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources.
Dividends
TDS paid quarterly dividends per share of $0.1125 in 2010, $0.1075 in 2009 and $0.1025 in 2008. TDS has no current plans to change its policy of paying dividends.
29
Telephone and Data Systems, Inc.
Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
APPLICATION OF CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES
TDS prepares its consolidated financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America ("GAAP"). TDS' significant accounting policies are discussed in detail in Note 1Summary of Significant Accounting Policies and Recent Accounting Pronouncements in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
Management believes the application of the following critical accounting policies and the estimates required by such application reflect its most significant judgments and estimates used in the preparation of TDS' consolidated financial statements. Management has discussed the development and selection of each of the following accounting policies and related estimates and disclosures with the Audit Committee of TDS' Board of Directors.
Goodwill and Licenses
See the Goodwill and Licenses Impairment Assessment section of Note 1Summary of Significant Accounting Policies and Recent Accounting Pronouncements in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for information on goodwill and licenses impairment testing policies and methods.
See Note 8Licenses and Goodwill in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information related to goodwill and licenses activity in 2010 and 2009.
The following discussion compares the impairment test as of November 1, 2010 to that as of November 1, 2009.
Goodwill
U.S. Cellular
U.S. Cellular tests goodwill for impairment at the level of reporting referred to as a "reporting unit." For purposes of impairment testing of goodwill in 2010, U.S. Cellular identified five reporting units based on geographic service areas. There were no changes to U.S. Cellular's reporting units, the allocation of goodwill to those reporting units, or to U.S. Cellular's overall goodwill impairment testing methodology between its two most recent impairment testing dates, November 1, 2010 and November 1, 2009.
A discounted cash flow approach was used to value each reporting unit, using value drivers and risks specific to the current industry and economic markets. The cash flow estimates incorporated assumptions that market participants would use in their estimates of fair value and may not be indicative of U.S. Cellular specific assumptions. Key assumptions made in this process were the revenue growth rate, discount rate, and projected capital expenditures. These assumptions were as follows as of the two most recent impairment testing dates:
Key assumptions
|
November 1, 2010 |
November 1, 2009 |
|||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Weighted-average expected revenue growth rate (next four years) |
2.18 | % | 2.13 | % | |||
Weighted-average long-term and terminal revenue growth rate (after year four) |
2.00 | % | 2.00 | % | |||
Discount rate |
10.5 | % | 11.5 | % | |||
Average annual capital expenditures (millions) |
$ | 540 | $ | 520 |
The decrease in the discount rate between November 1, 2009 and 2010 was a result of the decrease in several of the market-participant inputs used to calculate the weighted average cost of capital ("WACC") due to improved market conditions, primarily the risk-free rate and levered beta, partially offset by a higher company-specific risk premium.
30
Telephone and Data Systems, Inc.
Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
The carrying value of each U.S. Cellular reporting unit as of November 1, 2010 was as follows:
Reporting unit
|
Carrying value as reported by U.S. Cellular |
Incremental carrying value(1) |
Carrying value at TDS |
|||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
(Dollars in millions) |
|
|
|
|||||||
Central Region |
$ | 892 | $ | (199 | ) | $ | 693 | |||
Mid-Atlantic Region |
716 | 28 | 744 | |||||||
New England Region |
224 | 12 | 236 | |||||||
New York Region |
137 | 4 | 141 | |||||||
Northwest Region |
318 | 13 | 331 | |||||||
Total |
$ | 2,287 | $ | 2,145 | ||||||
As of November 1, 2010, the fair values of the reporting units exceeded their respective carrying values by amounts ranging from 42% to 185% of the respective carrying values. Therefore, no impairment of goodwill existed. Given that the fair values of the respective reporting units exceed their respective carrying values, provided all other assumptions remained the same, the discount rate would have to increase to a range of 15.1% to 18.8% to yield estimated fair values of reporting units that equal their respective carrying values at November 1, 2010. Further, assuming all other assumptions remained the same, the terminal growth rate assumptions would need to decrease to negative amounts, ranging from negative 43.7% to negative 19.9%, to yield estimates of fair value equal to the carrying values of the respective reporting units at November 1, 2010.
TDS Telecom
TDS Telecom has four reporting units: ILEC, Hosted and Managed Services, CLEC Metrocom, and CLEC Metrocom Minnesota. TDS Telecom's ILEC reporting unit has recorded goodwill primarily as a result of the acquisition of operating telephone companies. There were no changes to TDS Telecom's overall goodwill impairment testing methodology during 2010 or 2009. TDS acquired one Hosted and Managed Services company in March 2010 and recorded goodwill which was tested during 2010. The CLEC reporting units do not have any goodwill.
The publicly-traded guideline company and the recent transaction methods were utilized to value each reporting unit tested. The publicly-traded guideline company method develops an indication of fair value by calculating average market pricing multiples for selected publicly-traded companies using multiples of revenue, Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation and Amortization, and Earnings Before Interest and Taxes. The recent transaction method calculates market pricing multiples based upon recent acquisitions of similar businesses. In both methods, the developed multiples were applied to each reporting units' applicable financial measures to determine fair value. Given the nature of this methodology, no specific consideration of the economic environment was considered since those factors would be inherent in the multiples used. As of November 1, 2010, the fair value of TDS Telecom's ILEC reporting unit exceeded its carrying value by 52% and the value of the Hosted and Managed Services company exceeded its carrying value by 146%. As a result of its testing, TDS Telecom did not record an impairment to goodwill during 2010.
Licenses
U.S. Cellular tests licenses for impairment at the level of reporting referred to as a "unit of accounting." For purposes of its impairment testing of licenses as of November 1, 2010 and 2009, U.S. Cellular separated its FCC licenses into eighteen units of accounting based on geographic service areas. Thirteen of these eighteen units of accounting represented geographic groupings of licenses which,
31
Telephone and Data Systems, Inc.
Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
because they were not being utilized and, therefore, were not expected to generate cash flows from operating activities in the foreseeable future, were considered separate units of accounting for purposes of impairment testing.
Developed operating market licenses ("built licenses")
As indicated in Note 1Summary of Significant Accounting Policies and Recent Accounting PronouncementsGoodwill and Licenses Impairment Assessment, U.S. Cellular applies the build-out method to estimate the fair values of built licenses. Significant assumptions within the build-out method include the hypothetical build-out period, discount rate, long-term EBITDA margin, penetration rate, revenue growth rate, and capital expenditure requirements. The penetration rate and capital expenditure requirements varied among the different units of accounting and between years within the forecast periods. The following key assumptions were applied consistently across all units of accounting for purposes of the November 1, 2010 and 2009 licenses impairment assessment:
Key assumptions
|
November 1, 2010 |
November 1, 2009 |
|||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Build-out period |
7 years | 7 years | |||||
Discount rate |
9.0 | % | 10.0 | % | |||
Long-term EBITDA margin |
32.1 | % | 32.7 | % |
The discount rate used in the license valuation is less than the discount rate used in the valuation of reporting units for purposes of goodwill impairment testing. That is because the discount rate used for licenses does not include a company-specific risk premium as a wireless license would not be subject to such risk.
The discount rate is the most significant assumption used in the build-out method. The discount rate is estimated based on the overall risk-free interest rate adjusted for industry participant information, such as a typical capital structure (i.e., debt-equity ratio), the after-tax cost of debt and the cost of equity. The cost of equity takes into consideration the average risk specific to individual market participants. The decrease in the discount rate between November 1, 2009 and November 1, 2010 was a result of the decrease in several of the market-participant inputs used to calculate the weighted average cost of capital ("WACC") due to market conditions, primarily the risk free-rate and levered beta.
The results of the licenses impairment test at November 1, 2010 did not result in the recognition of a loss on impairment. Given that the fair values of the licenses exceed their respective carrying values, the discount rate would have to increase to a range of 9.9% to 11.0% in order to yield estimated fair values of licenses in the respective units of accounting that equal their respective carrying values at November 1, 2010.
Non-operating market licenses ("unbuilt licenses")
For purposes of performing impairment testing of unbuilt licenses, U.S. Cellular prepares estimates of fair value by reference to prices paid in recent auctions and market transactions where available. If such information is not available, the fair value of the unbuilt licenses is assumed to have changed by the same percentage, and in the same direction, that the fair value of built licenses measured using the build-out method changed during the period. There was no impairment loss recognized related to unbuilt licenses as a result of the November 1, 2010 licenses impairment test.
32
Telephone and Data Systems, Inc.
Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Carrying Value of Licenses
The carrying value of licenses at November 1, 2010 was as follows:
Unit of accounting(1)
|
Carrying value | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
(Dollars in millions) |
|
||||
U.S. CellularDeveloped Operating markets (5 units of accounting) |
|||||
Central Region |
$ | 623 | |||
Mid-Atlantic Region |
197 | ||||
New England Region |
80 | ||||
Northwest Region |
57 | ||||
New York Region |
1 | ||||
U.S. CellularNon-operating markets (13 units of accounting) |
|||||
Central (3 states) |
105 | ||||
South Central (3 states) |
5 | ||||
North Central (3 states) |
27 | ||||
Southwest Central I (3 states) |
8 | ||||
Southwest Central II (4 states) |
25 | ||||
Northwest Central I (5 states) |
14 | ||||
Northwest Central II (5 states) |
160 | ||||
Mid-Atlantic I (3 states) |
35 | ||||
Mid-Atlantic II (7 states) |
37 | ||||
Mississippi Valley (14 states) |
44 | ||||
Northeast (4 states) |
24 | ||||
North Northwest (2 states) |
3 | ||||
South Northwest (2 states) |
6 | ||||
Total |
$ | 1,451 | |||
TDS Telecom |
3 | ||||
Total(2) |
$ | 1,454 | |||
All units of accounting had a fair value that exceeded the carrying value by at least 10% of the carrying value. However, any declines in the fair value of such licenses in future periods could result in the recognition of impairment losses on such licenses and any such impairment losses would have a negative impact on future results of operations. The impairment losses on licenses are not expected to have a future impact on liquidity. TDS is unable to predict the amount, if any, of future impairment losses attributable to licenses. Further, historical operating results, particularly amounts related to impairment losses, are not indicative of future operating results.
33
Telephone and Data Systems, Inc.
Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Property, Plant and EquipmentDepreciation
U.S. Cellular and TDS Telecom each provide for depreciation using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets. TDS depreciates its leasehold improvement assets associated with leased properties over periods ranging from one to thirty years, which approximates the shorter of the assets' economic lives or the specific lease terms.
Annually, U.S. Cellular and TDS Telecom review their property, plant and equipment lives to ensure that the estimated useful lives are appropriate. The estimated useful lives of property, plant and equipment are critical accounting estimates because changing the lives of assets can result in larger or smaller charges for depreciation expense. Factors used in determining useful lives include technology changes, regulatory requirements, obsolescence and types of use. U.S. Cellular and TDS Telecom did not materially change the useful lives of their property, plant and equipment in 2010, 2009 or 2008.
Income Taxes
The amounts of income tax assets and liabilities, the related income tax provision and the amount of unrecognized tax benefits are critical accounting estimates because such amounts are significant to TDS' financial condition and results of operations.
The preparation of the consolidated financial statements requires TDS to calculate a provision for income taxes. This process involves estimating the actual current income tax liability together with assessing temporary differences resulting from the different treatment of items for tax purposes. These temporary differences result in deferred income tax assets and liabilities, which are included in TDS' Consolidated Balance Sheet. TDS must then assess the likelihood that deferred income tax assets will be realized based on future taxable income and, to the extent management believes that realization is not likely, establish a valuation allowance. Management's judgment is required in determining the provision for income taxes, deferred income tax assets and liabilities and any valuation allowance that is established for deferred income tax assets.
TDS recognizes the tax benefit from an uncertain tax position only if it is more likely than not that the tax position will be sustained on examination by the taxing authorities, based on the technical merits of the position. The tax benefits recognized in the financial statements from such a position are measured based on the largest benefit that has a greater than 50% likelihood of being realized upon ultimate resolution.
See Note 4Income Taxes in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for details regarding TDS' income tax provision, deferred income taxes and liabilities, valuation allowances and unrecognized tax benefits, including information regarding estimates that impact income taxes.
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts
U.S. Cellular's accounts receivable primarily consist of amounts owed by customers pursuant to service contracts and for equipment sales, by agents for sales of equipment to them and by other wireless carriers whose customers have used U.S. Cellular's wireless systems.
TDS Telecom's accounts receivable primarily consist of amounts owed by customers for services provided, by connecting companies for carrying interstate and intrastate long-distance traffic on its network and by interstate and intrastate revenue pools that distribute access charges.
The allowance for doubtful accounts is the best estimate of the amount of probable credit losses related to existing accounts receivable. The allowance is estimated based on historical experience and other factors that could affect collectability. Accounts receivable balances are reviewed on either an aggregate or individual basis for collectability depending on the type of receivable. When it is probable that an account balance will not be collected, the account balance is charged against the allowance for doubtful accounts. TDS does not have any off-balance sheet credit exposure related to its customers. TDS will
34
Telephone and Data Systems, Inc.
Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
continue to monitor its accounts receivable balances and related allowance for doubtful accounts on an ongoing basis to assess whether it has adequately provided for potentially uncollectible amounts.
See Note 1Summary of Significant Accounting Policies and Recent Accounting Pronouncements in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information regarding TDS' allowance for doubtful accounts.
Loyalty Reward Program
See the Revenue RecognitionU.S. Cellular section of Note 1Summary of Significant Accounting Policies and Recent Accounting Pronouncements in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for a description of this program and the related accounting.
U.S. Cellular follows the deferred revenue method of accounting for its loyalty reward program. Under this method, revenue allocated to loyalty reward points is deferred and recognized at the time the customer redeems loyalty reward points. U.S. Cellular does not have sufficient historical data in which to estimate any portion of loyalty reward points that will not be redeemed. As such, 100% of the value of the loyalty reward points is deferred until redeemed. U.S. Cellular will periodically review and revise the redemption rate as appropriate based on history and related future expectations.
CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS
The following persons are partners of Sidley Austin LLP, the principal law firm of TDS and its subsidiaries: Walter C.D. Carlson, a trustee and beneficiary of a voting trust that controls TDS, the non-executive Chairman of the Board and member of the Board of Directors of TDS and a director of U.S. Cellular, a subsidiary of TDS; William S. DeCarlo, the General Counsel of TDS and an Assistant Secretary of TDS and certain subsidiaries of TDS; and Stephen P. Fitzell, the General Counsel of U.S. Cellular and TDS Telecommunications Corporation and an Assistant Secretary of certain subsidiaries of TDS. Walter C.D. Carlson does not provide legal services to TDS or its subsidiaries. TDS, U.S. Cellular and their subsidiaries incurred legal costs from Sidley Austin LLP of $14.0 million in 2010, $13.8 million in 2009 and $12.0 million in 2008.
On September 29, 2010, TDS repurchased 272,323 Special Common Shares at the then current market price on the NYSE for a total price of $7.7 million, or an average of $28.24 per Special Common Share including broker fees, from an affiliate of Southeastern Asset Management, Inc. ("SEAM").
On May 29, 2009, TDS repurchased 1,730,200 Special Common Shares at the then current market price on the New York Stock Exchange ("NYSE") for a total price of $48.2 million, or an average of $27.89 per Special Common Share including broker fees, from an affiliate of SEAM. In addition, on July 20, 2009, TDS repurchased 405,000 Special Common Shares from SEAM at a price below the then current market price on the NYSE for a total price of $10.5 million, or an average of $25.87 per Special Common Share including broker fees.
At the time of each 2009 TDS repurchase, SEAM was a shareholder of more than 5% of TDS Special Common Shares and Common Shares. At the time of the 2010 TDS repurchase, SEAM was a shareholder of more than 5% of TDS Special Common Shares and currently continues to hold more than 5% of the Special Common Shares.
These transactions were not solicited by TDS and TDS did not enter into any agreements with SEAM. The September 29, 2010 and May 29, 2009 transactions were effected by TDS' broker pursuant to TDS' existing institutional brokerage account agreement on the NYSE pursuant to Rule 10b-18 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended ("Exchange Act"). The July 20, 2009 transaction was made by TDS' broker pursuant to an agreement entered into pursuant to Rule 10b5-1 under the Exchange Act and was effected on the NYSE in compliance with Rule 10b-18. The repurchases were made under TDS' share repurchase authorizations that were effective at the time of such repurchases.
See "Security Ownership by Certain Beneficial Owners" in TDS' Notice of Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement dated April 23, 2010, for further information about SEAM and its interest in TDS.
The Audit Committee of the Board of Directors is responsible for the review and evaluation of all related-party transactions, as such term is defined by the rules of the New York Stock Exchange.
35
Telephone and Data Systems, Inc.
Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
PRIVATE SECURITIES LITIGATION REFORM ACT OF 1995
SAFE HARBOR CAUTIONARY STATEMENT
This Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations and other sections of this Annual Report contain statements that are not based on historical facts, including the words "believes," "anticipates," "intends," "expects" and similar words. These statements constitute "forward-looking statements" within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Such forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause actual results, events or developments to be significantly different from any future results, events or developments expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. Such factors include, but are not limited to, the following risks:
36
Telephone and Data Systems, Inc.
Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
retain customers and, as a result, could adversely affect its business, financial condition or results of operations.
37
Telephone and Data Systems, Inc.
Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
You are referred to a further discussion of these risks as set forth under "Risk Factors" in TDS' Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010. TDS undertakes no obligation to update
38
Telephone and Data Systems, Inc.
Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
publicly any forward-looking statements whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. Readers should evaluate any statements in light of these important factors.
Long-Term Debt
As of December 31, 2010, TDS' long-term debt was in the form of fixed-rate notes with original maturities ranging up to 49 years. Fluctuations in market interest rates can lead to significant fluctuations in the fair value of these fixed-rate notes.
The following table presents the scheduled principal payments on long-term debt and capital lease obligations, and the related weighted average interest rates by maturity dates at December 31, 2010:
|
Principal Payments Due by Period | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
(Dollars in millions) |
Long-Term Debt Obligations(1) |
Weighted-Avg. Interest Rates on Long-Term Debt Obligations(2) |
|||||
2011 |
$ | 1.7 | 4.9 | % | |||
2012 |
5.1 | 5.6 | % | ||||
2013 |
0.5 | 5.5 | % | ||||
2014 |
0.4 | 7.0 | % | ||||
2015 |
1.8 | 1.2 | % | ||||
After 5 years |
1,502.4 | 7.1 | % | ||||
Total |
$ | 1,511.9 | 7.1 | % | |||
Fair Value of Long-Term Debt
At December 31, 2010 and 2009, the estimated fair value of long-term debt obligations, excluding capital lease obligations and the current portion of such long-term debt, was $1,482.2 million and $1,462.0 million, respectively. The fair value of long-term debt, excluding capital lease obligations and the current portion of such long-term debt, was estimated using market prices for TDS' 7.6% Series A Notes, 6.875% senior notes, 6.625% senior notes, and U.S. Cellular's 7.5% senior notes and discounted cash flow analysis for the remaining debt.
39
Telephone and Data Systems, Inc.
Consolidated Statement of Operations
Year Ended December 31,
|
2010 | 2009 | 2008 | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
(Dollars and shares in thousands, except per share amounts) |
|
|
|
|||||||||
Operating revenues |
$ | 4,986,829 | $ | 5,019,943 | $ | 5,091,388 | ||||||
Operating expenses |
||||||||||||
Cost of services and products (excluding Depreciation, amortization and accretion expense reported below) |
1,911,554 | 1,870,663 | 1,852,695 | |||||||||
Selling, general and administrative expense |
2,011,772 | 1,964,431 | 1,927,272 | |||||||||
Depreciation, amortization and accretion expense |
761,748 | 748,826 | 749,967 | |||||||||
Loss on impairment of intangible assets |
| 14,000 | 414,376 | |||||||||
Loss on asset disposals, net |
11,763 | 18,758 | 18,331 | |||||||||
Total operating expenses |
4,696,837 | 4,616,678 | 4,962,641 | |||||||||
Operating income |
289,992 | 403,265 | 128,747 | |||||||||
Investment and other income (expense) |
||||||||||||
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated entities |
98,074 | 90,732 | 89,812 | |||||||||
Interest and dividend income |
10,508 | 11,121 | 39,131 | |||||||||
Interest expense |
(115,220 | ) | (126,209 | ) | (139,304 | ) | ||||||
Gain on investments and financial instruments |
| | 31,595 | |||||||||
Other, net |
(2,089 | ) | 2,000 | 2,213 | ||||||||
Total investment and other income (expense) |
(8,727 | ) | (22,356 | ) | 23,447 | |||||||
Income before income taxes |
281,265 | 380,909 | 152,194 | |||||||||
Income tax expense |
92,283 | 133,800 | 34,299 | |||||||||
Net income |
188,982 | 247,109 | 117,895 | |||||||||
Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests, net of tax |
(45,126 | ) | (58,144 | ) | (29,399 | ) | ||||||
Net income attributable to TDS shareholders |
143,856 | 188,965 | 88,496 | |||||||||
Preferred dividend requirement |
(50 | ) | (51 | ) | (52 | ) | ||||||
Net income available to common |
$ | 143,806 | $ | 188,914 | $ | 88,444 | ||||||
Basic weighted average shares outstanding |
105,111 |
109,339 |
115,817 |
|||||||||
Basic earnings per share attributable to TDS shareholders |
$ | 1.37 | $ | 1.73 | $ | 0.76 | ||||||
Diluted weighted average shares outstanding |
105,506 |
109,577 |
116,255 |
|||||||||
Diluted earnings per share attributable to TDS shareholders |
$ | 1.36 | $ | 1.72 | $ | 0.76 | ||||||
Dividends per share |
$ |
0.45 |
$ |
0.43 |
$ |
0.41 |
||||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
40
Telephone and Data Systems, Inc.
Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows
Year Ended December 31,
|
2010 | 2009 | 2008 | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
|
|
||||||||||
Cash flows from operating activities |
|||||||||||||
Net income |
$ | 188,982 | $ | 247,109 | $ | 117,895 | |||||||
Add (deduct) adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash flows from operating activities |
|||||||||||||
Depreciation, amortization and accretion |
761,748 | 748,826 | 749,967 | ||||||||||
Bad debts expense |
83,098 | 115,989 | 83,004 | ||||||||||
Stock-based compensation expense |
35,128 | 32,486 | 22,693 | ||||||||||
Deferred income taxes, net |
74,074 | 34,275 | (431,131 | ) | |||||||||
Gain on investments and financial instruments, net |
| | (31,595 | ) | |||||||||
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated entities |
(98,074 | ) | (90,732 | ) | (89,812 | ) | |||||||
Distributions from unconsolidated entities |
100,845 | 91,587 | 92,335 | ||||||||||
Loss on impairment of intangible assets |
| 14,000 | 414,376 | ||||||||||
Loss on asset disposals, net |
11,763 | 18,758 | 18,331 | ||||||||||
Noncash interest expense |
9,733 | 4,412 | 10,125 | ||||||||||
Excess tax benefit from stock awards |
(117 | ) | (25 | ) | (1,966 | ) | |||||||
Other operating activities |
500 | (46 | ) | (1,831 | ) | ||||||||
Changes in assets and liabilities |
|||||||||||||
Accounts receivable |
(79,182 | ) | (115,087 | ) | (80,405 | ) | |||||||
Inventory |
40,657 | (34,566 | ) | (17,123 | ) | ||||||||
Accounts payable |
(4,016 | ) | 29,646 | 6,804 | |||||||||
Customer deposits and deferred revenues |
6,478 | (8,763 | ) | 6,777 | |||||||||
Accrued taxes |
(95,872 | ) | 61,630 | (3,023 | ) | ||||||||
Accrued interest |
(9,270 | ) | (2,009 | ) | (4,221 | ) | |||||||
Other assets and liabilities |
95,470 | (44,896 | ) | (12,308 | ) | ||||||||
|
1,121,945 | 1,102,594 | 848,892 | ||||||||||
Cash flows from investing activities |
|||||||||||||
Additions to property, plant and equipment |
(755,032 | ) | (671,165 | ) | (734,923 | ) | |||||||
Cash paid for acquisitions and licenses |
(81,691 | ) | (29,276 | ) | (389,189 | ) | |||||||
Cash received from divestitures |
| 50 | 6,838 | ||||||||||
Proceeds from disposition of investments |
| | 259,017 | ||||||||||
Cash paid to settle derivative liabilities |
| | (17,404 | ) | |||||||||
Cash paid for investments |
(493,750 | ) | (109,230 | ) | (27,446 | ) | |||||||
Cash received for investments |
106,255 | 23,660 | | ||||||||||
Other investing activities |
370 | 4,515 | 355 | ||||||||||
|
(1,223,848 | ) | (781,446 | ) | (902,752 | ) | |||||||
Cash flows from financing activities |
|||||||||||||
Borrowings from revolving credit facilities |
| | 100,000 | ||||||||||
Repayment of revolving credit facilities |
| | (100,000 | ) | |||||||||
Issuance of long-term debt |
225,648 | | | ||||||||||
Repayment of long-term debt |
(220,249 | ) | (143,078 | ) | (9,448 | ) | |||||||
Settlement of variable prepaid forward contracts |
| | (47,357 | ) | |||||||||
TDS Common Shares and Special Common Shares |
|||||||||||||
reissued for benefit plans, net of tax payments |
309 | 819 | 1,409 | ||||||||||
U.S. Cellular Common Shares reissued for benefit plans, net of tax payments |
509 | (82 | ) | (2,288 | ) | ||||||||
Excess tax benefit from stock awards |
117 | 25 | 1,966 | ||||||||||
Repurchase of TDS Common and Special Common Shares |
(68,053 | ) | (178,536 | ) | (197,672 | ) | |||||||
Repurchase of U.S. Cellular Common Shares |
(52,827 | ) | (33,585 | ) | (28,366 | ) | |||||||
Dividends paid |
(47,202 | ) | (46,798 | ) | (47,320 | ) | |||||||
Payment of debt issuance costs |
(12,533 | ) | (10,079 | ) | | ||||||||
Distributions to noncontrolling interests |
(19,630 | ) | (17,533 | ) | (16,769 | ) | |||||||
Payments to acquire additional interest in subsidiaries |
(9,248 | ) | (285 | ) | | ||||||||
Other financing activities |
2,204 | 1,667 | 2,568 | ||||||||||
|
(200,955 | ) | (427,465 | ) | (343,277 | ) | |||||||
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents |
(302,858 | ) | (106,317 | ) | (397,137 | ) | |||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
|||||||||||||
Beginning of period |
670,992 | 777,309 | 1,174,446 | ||||||||||
End of period |
$ | 368,134 | $ | 670,992 | $ | 777,309 | |||||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
41
Telephone and Data Systems, Inc.
Consolidated Balance SheetAssets
December 31,
|
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
|
|||||||
Current assets |
|||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ | 368,134 | $ | 670,992 | |||||
Short-term investments |
402,882 | 113,275 | |||||||
Accounts receivable |
|||||||||
Due from customers, less allowances of $28,859 and $30,422, respectively |
378,976 | 384,470 | |||||||
Other, less allowances of $6,148 and $7,201, respectively |
133,970 | 130,973 | |||||||
Inventory |
116,330 | 156,987 | |||||||
Net deferred income tax asset |
37,079 | 29,874 | |||||||
Prepaid expenses |
76,935 | 94,336 | |||||||
Prepaid income taxes |
64,386 | 3,718 | |||||||
Other current assets |
17,384 | 63,046 | |||||||
|
1,596,076 | 1,647,671 | |||||||
Investments |
|||||||||
Licenses |
1,460,126 | 1,443,025 | |||||||
Goodwill |
728,455 | 707,840 | |||||||
Other intangible assets, net of accumulated amortization of $119,555 and $108,944, respectively |
30,810 | 26,589 | |||||||
Investments in unconsolidated entities |
197,922 | 203,799 | |||||||
Long-term investments |
102,185 | | |||||||
Other investments |
8,988 | 9,785 | |||||||
|
2,528,486 | 2,391,038 | |||||||
Property, plant and equipment |
|||||||||
In service and under construction |
9,393,385 | 8,760,327 | |||||||
Less: Accumulated depreciation |
5,835,051 | 5,252,482 | |||||||
|
3,558,334 | 3,507,845 | |||||||
Other assets and deferred charges |
79,623 | 65,759 | |||||||
Total assets |
$ |
7,762,519 |
$ |
7,612,313 |
|||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
42
Telephone and Data Systems, Inc.
Consolidated Balance SheetLiabilities and Equity
December 31,
|
2010 | 2009 | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
|
|||||||||
Current liabilities |
|||||||||||
Current portion of long-term debt |
$ | 1,711 | $ | 2,509 | |||||||
Accounts payable |
344,355 | 347,348 | |||||||||
Customer deposits and deferred revenues |
171,781 | 164,451 | |||||||||
Accrued interest |
2,718 | 12,227 | |||||||||
Accrued taxes |
46,110 | 62,568 | |||||||||
Accrued compensation |
99,020 | 93,524 | |||||||||
Other current liabilities |
144,938 | 117,081 | |||||||||
|
810,633 | 799,708 | |||||||||
Deferred liabilities and credits |
|||||||||||
Net deferred income tax liability |
585,468 | 517,762 | |||||||||
Other deferred liabilities and credits |
404,892 | 373,862 | |||||||||
Long-term debt |
1,499,862 |
1,492,908 |
|||||||||
Commitments and contingencies |
|||||||||||
Noncontrolling interests with redemption features |
855 |
727 |
|||||||||
Equity |
|||||||||||
TDS shareholders' equity |
|||||||||||
Series A Common, Special Common and Common Shares |
|||||||||||
Authorized 290,000 shares (25,000 Series A Common, 165,000 Special Common and 100,000 Common Shares) |
|||||||||||
Issued 127,045 shares (6,510 Series A Common, 63,442 Special Common and 57,093 Common Shares) and 127,016 shares (6,492 Series A Common, 63,442 Special Common and 57,082 Common Shares), respectively |
|||||||||||
Outstanding 103,936 shares (6,510 Series A Common, 47,531 Special Common and 49,895 Common Shares) and 106,022 shares (6,492 Series A Common, 49,725 Special Common and 49,805 Common Shares), respectively |
|||||||||||
Par Value ($.01 per share) ($65 Series A Common, $634 Special Common and $571 Common Shares) |
1,270 | 1,270 | |||||||||
Capital in excess of par value |
2,107,929 | 2,088,807 | |||||||||
Special Common and Common Treasury shares at cost: |
|||||||||||
Treasury shares 23,109 (15,911 Special Common and 7,198 Common Shares) and 20,994 (13,717 Special Common and 7,277 Common Shares), respectively |
(738,695 | ) | (681,649 | ) | |||||||
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
(3,208 | ) | (2,710 | ) | |||||||
Retained earnings |
2,446,626 | 2,358,580 | |||||||||
Total TDS shareholders' equity |
3,813,922 | 3,764,298 | |||||||||
Preferred shares |
830 |
832 |
|||||||||
Noncontrolling interests |
646,057 | 662,216 | |||||||||
Total equity |
4,460,809 | 4,427,346 | |||||||||
Total liabilities and equity |
$ | 7,762,519 | $ | 7,612,313 | |||||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
43
Telephone and Data Systems, Inc.
Consolidated Statement of Changes in Equity
|
TDS Shareholders | |
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Series A Common, Special Common and Common Shares |
Capital in Excess of Par Value |
Special Common and Common Treasury Shares |
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) |
Retained Earnings |
Total TDS Shareholders' Equity |
Preferred Shares |
Non controlling Interests |
Total Equity |
|||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
December 31, 2007 |
$ | 1,268 | $ | 2,048,110 | $ | (325,467 | ) | $ | 515,043 | $ | 1,687,625 | $ | 3,926,579 | $ | 860 | $ | 653,749 | $ | 4,581,188 | |||||||||
Add (Deduct) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net income attributable to TDS shareholders |
| | | | 88,496 | 88,496 | | | 88,496 | |||||||||||||||||||
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests classified as equity |
| | | | | | | 25,545 | 25,545 | |||||||||||||||||||
Net change in marketable equity securities and equity investments |
| | | (17,509 | ) | | (17,509 | ) | | (1,945 | ) | (19,454 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Cumulative-effect adjustment related to fair value accounting (Note 3) |
| | | (502,677 | ) | 502,677 | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||
Changes related to retirement plan |
| | | (8,248 | ) | | (8,248 | ) | | | (8,248 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Common, Special Common and Series A Common Shares dividends |
| | | | (47,256 | ) | (47,256 | ) | | | (47,256 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Preferred dividend requirement |
| | | | (52 | ) | (52 | ) | | | (52 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Repurchase of shares |
| | (199,607 | ) | | | (199,607 | ) | (8 | ) | | (199,615 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Dividend reinvestment plan |
2 | 1,755 | | | | 1,757 | | | 1,757 | |||||||||||||||||||
Incentive and compensation plans |
| 51 | 11,966 | | (10,021 | ) | 1,996 | | | 1,996 | ||||||||||||||||||
Adjust investment in subsidiaries for repurchases, issuances and other compensation plans |
| 8,690 | | | | 8,690 | | (12,848 | ) | (4,158 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Stock-based compensation awards(1) |
| 7,571 | | | | 7,571 | | | 7,571 | |||||||||||||||||||
Tax windfall (shortfall) from from stock awards(2) |
| 420 | | | | 420 | | | 420 | |||||||||||||||||||
Distributions to noncontrolling interests |
| | | | | | | (16,769 | ) | (16,769 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Other |
| | | | | | | 183 | 183 | |||||||||||||||||||
December 31, 2008 |
$ | 1,270 | $ | 2,066,597 | $ | (513,108 | ) | $ | (13,391 | ) | $ | 2,221,469 | $ | 3,762,837 | $ | 852 | $ | 647,915 | $ | 4,411,604 | ||||||||
44
Telephone and Data Systems, Inc.
Consolidated Statement of Changes in Equity
|
TDS Shareholders | |
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Series A Common, Special Common and Common Shares |
Capital in Excess of Par Value |
Special Common and Common Treasury Shares |
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) |
Retained Earnings |
Total TDS Shareholders' Equity |
Preferred Shares |
Non controlling Interests |
Total Equity |
|||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
December 31, 2008 |
$ | 1,270 | $ | 2,066,597 | $ | (513,108 | ) | $ | (13,391 | ) | $ | 2,221,469 | $ | 3,762,837 | $ | 852 | $ | 647,915 | $ | 4,411,604 | ||||||||
Add (Deduct) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net income attributable to TDS shareholders |
| | | | 188,965 | 188,965 | | | 188,965 | |||||||||||||||||||
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests classified as equity |
| | | | | | | 58,006 | 58,006 | |||||||||||||||||||
Net change in marketable equity securities and equity investments |
| | | (302 | ) | | (302 | ) | | | (302 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Changes related to retirement plan |
| | | 10,983 | | 10,983 | | | 10,983 | |||||||||||||||||||
Common, Special Common and Series A Common Shares dividends |
| | | | (46,747 | ) | (46,747 | ) | | | (46,747 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Preferred dividend requirement |
| | | | (51 | ) | (51 | ) | | | (51 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Repurchase of shares |
| | (176,601 | ) | | (4 | ) | (176,605 | ) | (20 | ) | | (176,625 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Dividend reinvestment plan |
| 1 | 1,243 | | 286 | 1,530 | | | 1,530 | |||||||||||||||||||
Incentive and compensation plans |
| (44 | ) | 6,817 | | (5,338 | ) | 1,435 | | | 1,435 | |||||||||||||||||
Adjust investment in subsidiaries for repurchases, issuances and other compensation plans |
| 7,705 | | | | 7,705 | | (26,172 | ) | (18,467 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Stock-based compensation awards(1) |
| 16,124 | | | | 16,124 | | | 16,124 | |||||||||||||||||||
Tax windfall (shortfall) from from stock awards(2) |
| (1,576 | ) | | | | (1,576 | ) | | | (1,576 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Distributions to noncontrolling interests |
| | | | | | | (17,533 | ) | (17,533 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
December 31, 2009 |
$ | 1,270 | $ | 2,088,807 | $ | (681,649 | ) | $ | (2,710 | ) | $ | 2,358,580 | $ | 3,764,298 | $ | 832 | $ | 662,216 | $ | 4,427,346 | ||||||||
45
Telephone and Data Systems, Inc.
Consolidated Statement of Changes in Equity
|
TDS Shareholders | |
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Series A Common, Special Common and Common Shares |
Capital in Excess of Par Value |
Special Common and Common Treasury Shares |
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) |
Retained Earnings |
Total TDS Shareholders' Equity |
Preferred Shares |
Non controlling Interests |
Total Equity |
|||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
December 31, 2009 |
$ | 1,270 | $ | 2,088,807 | $ | (681,649 | ) | $ | (2,710 | ) | $ | 2,358,580 | $ | 3,764,298 | $ | 832 | $ | 662,216 | $ | 4,427,346 | ||||||||
Add (Deduct) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net income attributable to TDS shareholders |
| | | | 143,856 | 143,856 | | | 143,856 | |||||||||||||||||||
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests classified as equity |
| | | | | | | 45,033 | 45,033 | |||||||||||||||||||
Net unrealized gain (loss) on equity investments |
| | | 84 | | 84 | | | 84 | |||||||||||||||||||
Changes related to retirement plan |
| | | (582 | ) | | (582 | ) | | | (582 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Common, Special Common and Series A Common Shares dividends |
| | | | (47,152 | ) | (47,152 | ) | | | (47,152 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Preferred dividend requirement |
| | | | (50 | ) | (50 | ) | | | (50 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Repurchase of shares |
| | (68,053 | ) | | (1 | ) | (68,054 | ) | (2 | ) | | (68,056 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Dividend reinvestment plan |
| 1,858 | 5,492 | | (3,283 | ) | 4,067 | | | 4,067 | ||||||||||||||||||
Incentive and compensation plans |
| 551 | 5,515 | | (5,324 | ) | 742 | | | 742 | ||||||||||||||||||
Adjust investment in subsidiaries for repurchases, issuances, other compensation plans and noncontrolling interest purchases |
| (137 | ) | | | | (137 | ) | | (41,562 | ) | (41,699 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Stock-based compensation awards(1) |
| 17,084 | | | | 17,084 | | | 17,084 | |||||||||||||||||||
Tax windfall (shortfall) from stock awards(2) |
| (234 | ) | | | | (234 | ) | | | (234 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Distributions to noncontrolling interests |
| | | | | | | (19,630 | ) | (19,630 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
December 31, 2010 |
$ | 1,270 | $ | 2,107,929 | $ | (738,695 | ) | $ | (3,208 | ) | $ | 2,446,626 | $ | 3,813,922 | $ | 830 | $ | 646,057 | $ | 4,460,809 | ||||||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
46
Telephone and Data Systems, Inc.
Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income
Year Ended December 31,
|
2010 | 2009 | 2008 | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
|
|
||||||||
Net income |
$ | 188,982 | $ | 247,109 | $ | 117,895 | |||||
Net change in accumulated other comprehensive income |
|||||||||||
Net change in marketable equity securities and equity method investments |
84 | (302 | ) | (19,454 | ) | ||||||
Changes related to retirement plan |
(582 | ) | 10,983 | (8,248 | ) | ||||||
Comprehensive income |
188,484 | 257,790 | 90,193 | ||||||||
Less: Comprehensive income attributable to noncontrolling interests |
(45,126 | ) | (58,144 | ) | (27,454 | ) | |||||
Comprehensive income attributable to TDS shareholders |
$ | 143,358 | $ | 199,646 | $ | 62,739 | |||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
47
Telephone and Data Systems, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
NOTE 1 SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
Nature of Operations
Telephone and Data Systems, Inc. ("TDS") is a diversified telecommunications company providing high-quality telecommunications services in 36 states to approximately 6.1 million wireless customers and 1.1 million wireline equivalent access lines at December 31, 2010. TDS conducts substantially all of its wireless operations through its 83% owned subsidiary, United States Cellular Corporation ("U.S. Cellular"), and provides wireline services through its incumbent local exchange carrier ("ILEC") and competitive local exchange carrier ("CLEC") operations under its wholly owned subsidiary, TDS Telecommunications Corporation ("TDS Telecom"). TDS conducts printing and distribution services through its majority-owned subsidiary, Suttle-Straus, Inc. ("Suttle-Straus"), which represents a small portion of TDS' operations.
TDS has three reportable segments: (i) U.S. Cellular's wireless operations; (ii) TDS Telecom's ILEC wireline operations and (iii) TDS Telecom's CLEC wireline operations. TDS does not have any foreign operations. See Note 17Business Segment Information, for summary financial information on each business segment.
Principles of Consolidation
The accounting policies of TDS conform to accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America ("GAAP") as set forth in the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") Accounting Standards Codification ("ASC"). Unless otherwise specified, references to accounting provisions and GAAP in these notes refer to the requirements of the FASB ASC. The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of TDS, its majority-owned subsidiaries, general partnerships in which it has a majority partnership interest and variable interest entities ("VIEs") in which TDS is the primary beneficiary. Both VIE and primary beneficiary represent terms defined by GAAP. Prior to January 1, 2010, the primary beneficiary of a VIE was the entity that recognized a majority of a VIE's expected gains or losses, as determined based on a quantitative model. Effective January 1, 2010, new provisions under GAAP related to accounting for VIEs provide for a more qualitative assessment in determining the primary beneficiary of a VIE. The revised consolidation guidance related to VIEs effective January 1, 2010 did not change TDS' consolidated reporting entities.
Effective January 1, 2009, TDS adopted new required provisions under GAAP related to the accounting and reporting for noncontrolling interests.
Pursuant to this adoption, the following provisions were applied prospectively effective January 1, 2009:
All material intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated.
48
Telephone and Data Systems, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
NOTE 1 SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS (Continued)
Reclassifications
Certain prior year amounts have been reclassified to conform to the 2010 financial statement presentation. These reclassifications did not affect consolidated net income attributable to TDS shareholders, cash flows, assets, liabilities or equity for the years presented.
Business Combinations
Effective January 1, 2009, TDS adopted new required provisions under GAAP related to accounting for business combinations. Although the revised provisions still require that all business combinations are to be accounted for at fair value in accordance with the acquisition method, they require TDS to revise its application of the acquisition method in a number of significant aspects. Specifically, the new provisions require that transaction costs are to be expensed and that the acquirer must recognize 100% of the acquiree's assets and liabilities rather than a proportional share, for acquisitions of less than 100% of a business. In addition, the revised provisions eliminate the step acquisition model and provide that all business combinations, whether full, partial or step acquisitions, will result in all assets and liabilities of an acquired business being recorded at their fair values at the acquisition date.
During 2008, TDS applied the provisions of GAAP related to business combinations in effect during that period. Similar to the revised provisions, the previous provisions required the application of the acquisition method whereby business combinations were to be accounted for at fair value. However the previous provisions were different in a number of respects, including (but not limited to) the requirement that all direct and incremental costs relating to an acquisition be included in the acquisition costs, and the requirement that the acquirer only recognize its proportional share of the fair value of assets and liabilities acquired in a partial business acquisition.
Use of Estimates
The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect (a) the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and (b) the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reported period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Significant estimates are involved in accounting for goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets, depreciation, amortization and accretion, allowance for doubtful accounts, loyalty reward points, and income taxes.
Cash and Cash Equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents include cash and short-term, highly liquid investments with original maturities of three months or less.
Outstanding checks totaled $26.5 million and $26.1 million at December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively, and are classified as Accounts payable in the Consolidated Balance Sheet.
Short-Term and Long-Term Investments
As of December 31, 2010 and 2009, TDS had $402.9 million and $113.3 million in Short-term investments and $102.2 million and $0 in Long-term investments, respectively. Short-term and Long-term investments consist of certificates of deposit (short-term only), U.S. treasuries and corporate notes, all of which are designated as held-to-maturity investments, and are recorded at amortized cost in the Consolidated Balance Sheet. The corporate notes are guaranteed by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. For these investments, TDS' objective is to earn a higher rate of return on funds that are not anticipated to be required to meet liquidity needs in the near term, while maintaining a low level of
49
Telephone and Data Systems, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
NOTE 1 SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS (Continued)
investment risk. See Note 3Fair Value Measurements in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional details on Short-term and Long-term investments.
Accounts Receivable and Allowance for Doubtful Accounts
U.S. Cellular's accounts receivable primarily consist of amounts owed by customers pursuant to service contracts and for equipment sales, by agents for sales of equipment to them and by other wireless carriers whose customers have used U.S. Cellular's wireless systems.
TDS Telecom's accounts receivable primarily consist of amounts owed by customers for services provided, by connecting companies for carrying interstate and intrastate long-distance traffic on its network, and by interstate and intrastate revenue pools that distribute access charges.
The allowance for doubtful accounts is the best estimate of the amount of probable credit losses related to existing accounts receivable. The allowance is estimated based on historical experience and other factors that could affect collectability. Accounts receivable balances are reviewed on either an aggregate or individual basis for collectability depending on the type of receivable. When it is probable that an account balance will not be collected, the account balance is charged against the allowance for doubtful accounts. TDS does not have any off-balance sheet credit exposure related to its customers.
The changes in the allowance for doubtful accounts during the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008 were as follows:
Year Ended December 31,
|
2010 | 2009 | 2008 | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
|
|
|||||||||
Beginning Balance |
$ | 37,623 | $ | 19,202 | $ | 21,929 | ||||||
Additions, net of recoveries |
83,098 | 115,989 | 83,004 | |||||||||
Deductions |
(85,714 | ) | (97,568 | ) | (85,731 | ) | ||||||
Ending Balance |
$ | 35,007 | $ | 37,623 | $ | 19,202 | ||||||
Inventory
Inventory primarily consists of wireless devices stated at the lower of cost or market, with cost determined using the first-in, first-out method and market determined by replacement costs or estimated net realizable value. TDS Telecom's materials and supplies are stated at average cost.
Fair Value Measurements
Under the provisions of GAAP, fair value is a market-based measurement and not an entity-specific measurement, based on an exchange transaction in which the entity sells an asset or transfers a liability (exit price). The provisions also establish a fair value hierarchy that contains three levels for inputs used in fair value measurements. Level 1 inputs include quoted market prices for identical assets or liabilities in active markets. Level 2 inputs include quoted market prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets or quoted market prices for identical assets and liabilities in inactive markets. Level 3 inputs are unobservable.
In addition, on January 1, 2008, TDS elected provisions under GAAP that permit companies to choose to measure various financial instruments and certain other items at fair value. At the date the option is elected, entities are required to record a cumulative-effect adjustment to beginning retained earnings. In subsequent periods, for those instruments in which the fair value option is elected, unrealized gains and losses are recorded in the Consolidated Statement of Operations. On January 1, 2008, TDS elected these provisions for its investment in Deutsche Telekom Ordinary Shares, and also for the "collar" portions of the variable prepaid forward contracts ("forward contracts") related to such Deutsche
50
Telephone and Data Systems, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
NOTE 1 SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS (Continued)
Telekom Ordinary Shares. TDS elected to do this for these items in order to better align the financial statement presentation of the unrealized gains and losses attributable to these items with their underlying economics. The forward contracts were settled and the Deutsche Telekom Ordinary Shares were disposed of in 2008.
Derivative Financial Instruments
TDS has in the past used derivative financial instruments in the form of forward contracts to reduce risks related to fluctuations in market prices of marketable equity securities. TDS did not hold or issue derivative financial instruments for trading purposes. During 2008, TDS had forward contracts in place with respect to the Deutsche Telekom Ordinary Shares it held, hedging the market price risk with respect to the contracted securities. These forward contracts settled in 2008. The downside market risk was hedged at or above the accounting cost basis of the securities.
See Note 3Fair Value Measurements for more information.
Licenses
Licenses consist of costs incurred in acquiring Federal Communications Commission ("FCC") licenses to provide wireless service. These costs include amounts paid to license applicants and owners of interests in entities awarded licenses and all direct and incremental costs related to acquiring the licenses. Prior to a change in the application of required GAAP in 2009, TDS had also allocated amounts to Licenses in conjunction with step acquisitions related to U.S. Cellular's repurchase of U.S. Cellular Common Shares.
TDS has determined that wireless licenses are indefinite-lived intangible assets and, therefore, not subject to amortization, based on the following factors:
Goodwill
TDS has goodwill as a result of its acquisitions of wireless markets, the acquisition of operating telephone companies and, prior to 2009, step acquisitions related to U.S. Cellular's repurchase of its common shares. Such goodwill represents the excess of the total purchase price over the fair value of net assets acquired in these transactions.
51
Telephone and Data Systems, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
NOTE 1 SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS (Continued)
Goodwill and Licenses Impairment Assessment
Goodwill and licenses must be assessed for impairment annually or more frequently if events or changes in circumstances indicate that such assets might be impaired.
The impairment test for goodwill is a two-step process. The first step compares the fair value of the reporting unit to its carrying value. If the carrying amount exceeds the fair value, the second step of the test is performed to measure the amount of impairment loss, if any. The second step compares the implied fair value of reporting unit goodwill with the carrying amount of that goodwill. To calculate the implied fair value of goodwill in this second step, an enterprise allocates the fair value of the reporting unit to all of the assets and liabilities of that reporting unit (including any unrecognized intangible assets) as if the reporting unit had been acquired in a business combination and the fair value was the price paid to acquire the reporting unit. The excess of the fair value of the reporting unit over the amount assigned to the assets and liabilities of the reporting unit is the implied fair value of goodwill. If the carrying amount of goodwill exceeds the implied fair value of goodwill, an impairment loss is recognized for that difference.
The impairment test for an indefinite-lived intangible asset other than goodwill consists of comparing the fair value of the intangible asset to its carrying amount. If the carrying amount exceeds the fair value, an impairment loss is recognized for the difference.
Quoted market prices in active markets are the best evidence of fair value of an intangible asset or reporting unit and are used when available. If quoted market prices are not available, the estimate of fair value is based on the best information available, including prices for similar assets and the use of other valuation techniques. Other valuation techniques include present value analysis, multiples of earnings or revenues, or similar performance measures. The use of these techniques involve assumptions by management about factors that are uncertain including future cash flows, the appropriate discount rate, and other inputs. Different assumptions for these inputs could create materially different results.
Prior to 2009, U.S. Cellular completed the required annual impairment assessment of its licenses and goodwill as of April 1 of each year. As a result of the deterioration in the credit and financial markets and the decline of the overall economy in the fourth quarter of 2008, U.S. Cellular performed an interim impairment assessment of licenses and goodwill as of December 31, 2008. Effective April 1, 2009, U.S. Cellular adopted a new accounting policy whereby its annual impairment review of goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets will be performed as of November 1 instead of the second quarter of each year. The change in the annual goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible asset impairment testing date was made to better align the annual impairment test with the timing of U.S. Cellular's annual strategic planning process, which allows for a better estimate of the future cash flows used in discounted cash flow models to test for impairment. This change in accounting policy did not delay, accelerate or avoid an impairment charge.
U.S. Cellular tests goodwill for impairment at the level of reporting referred to as a reporting unit. For purposes of impairment testing of goodwill in 2010 and 2009, U.S. Cellular identified five reporting units. The five reporting units represent five geographic groupings of FCC licenses, representing five geographic service areas. U.S. Cellular tests licenses for impairment at the level of reporting referred to as a unit of accounting. For purposes of its annual impairment testing of licenses as of November 1, 2010 and 2009, U.S. Cellular combined its FCC licenses into eighteen units of accounting. Of these, thirteen of such eighteen units of accounting represented geographic groupings of licenses which, because they were not being utilized and, therefore, were not expected to generate cash flows from operating activities in the foreseeable future, were considered separate units of accounting for purposes of impairment testing. The five units of accounting for which licenses are being utilized are referred to as "built licenses" and the thirteen units of accounting for which licenses are not being utilized are referred to as "unbuilt licenses."
52
Telephone and Data Systems, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
NOTE 1 SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS (Continued)
For purposes of impairment testing of goodwill, U.S. Cellular prepares valuations of each of the five reporting units. A discounted cash flow approach was used to value each reporting unit, using value drivers and risks specific to the current industry and economic markets. The cash flow estimates incorporated assumptions that market participants would use in their estimates of fair value. Key assumptions made in this process were the discount rate, estimated future cash flows, projected capital expenditures and the terminal growth rate.
In 2009, U.S. Cellular changed its method of estimating the fair value of built licenses for purposes of impairment testing from the multiple period excess cash flow method ("MPECF method") to the build-out method. U.S. Cellular elected to make this change as the build-out method is a more widely used and accepted valuation method in estimating the fair value of licenses for purposes of impairment testing in the wireless industry. U.S. Cellular does not believe the build-out method yields a significantly different estimate of the fair value of licenses than the MPECF method.
The MPECF method estimated the fair value of the units of accounting by measuring the future cash flows of the license groups, reduced by charges for contributory assets such as working capital, trademarks, existing subscribers, fixed assets and assembled workforce to arrive at the economic margin. A contributory asset charge for goodwill was subtracted from the economic margin to arrive at the after-tax excess cash flows applicable to the licenses.
The build-out method estimates the value of licenses by calculating future cash flows from a hypothetical start-up wireless company and assumes that the only assets available upon formation are the underlying licenses. To apply this method, a hypothetical build-out of the company's wireless network, infrastructure, workforce and related costs are projected based on market participant information. Calculated cash flows, along with a terminal value, are discounted to the present and summed to determine the estimated fair value.
For units of accounting which consist of unbuilt licenses, U.S. Cellular prepares estimates of fair value by reference to prices paid in recent auctions and market transactions where available. If such information is not available, the fair value of the unbuilt licenses is assumed to change by the same percentage, and in the same direction, that the fair value of built licenses measured using the build-out method changed during the period.
As a result of updated guidance promulgated by the FASB effective January 1, 2009, TDS did not record any amounts to licenses and goodwill as a result of U.S. Cellular's purchases of U.S. Cellular Common Shares as step acquisitions using purchase accounting after 2008. Prior to January 1, 2009, TDS had recorded amounts as licenses and goodwill as a result of accounting for U.S. Cellular's purchases of U.S. Cellular Common Shares as step acquisitions using purchase accounting. TDS' ownership percentage of U.S. Cellular increased upon these U.S. Cellular share repurchases. The purchase price in excess of the fair value of the net assets acquired was allocated principally to licenses and goodwill. For impairment testing purposes, the additional TDS licenses and goodwill amounts are allocated to the same reporting units and units of accounting used by U.S. Cellular. Consequently, U.S. Cellular's license and goodwill balances reported on a stand-alone basis do not match the TDS consolidated licenses and goodwill balances for U.S. Cellular, and impairment losses recognized by TDS related to U.S. Cellular licenses and goodwill may exceed those recognized by U.S. Cellular.
TDS Telecom has recorded goodwill as a result of the acquisition of operating telephone companies and other service businesses and has assigned this goodwill to its ILEC reporting unit. For the purposes of impairment testing, the publicly-traded guideline company method and the recent transaction method were utilized. The publicly-traded guideline company method develops an indication of value by calculating market pricing multiples for selected publicly-traded companies. The recent transaction method calculates market pricing multiples based upon recent actual acquisitions of similar businesses.
53
Telephone and Data Systems, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
NOTE 1 SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS (Continued)
In both methods, the developed multiples are applied to the appropriate financial measure of TDS Telecom's ILEC reporting unit to determine the reporting unit's fair value.
Investments in Unconsolidated Entities
Investments in unconsolidated entities consist of amounts invested in wireless and wireline entities in which TDS holds a noncontrolling interest. TDS follows the equity method of accounting for such investments in which its ownership interest equals or exceeds 20% for corporations and equals or exceeds 3% for partnerships and limited liability companies. The cost method of accounting is followed for such investments in which TDS' ownership interest is less than 20% for corporations and is less than 3% for partnerships and limited liability companies, and for investments for which TDS does not have the ability to exercise significant influence.
For its equity method investments for which financial information is readily available, TDS records its equity in the earnings of the entity in the current period. For its equity method investments for which financial information is not readily available, TDS records its equity in the earnings of the entity on a one quarter lag basis.
Property, Plant and Equipment
Property, plant and equipment is stated at the original cost of construction or purchase including capitalized costs of certain taxes, payroll-related expenses, interest and estimated costs to remove the assets.
Expenditures that enhance the productive capacity of assets in service or extend their useful lives are capitalized and depreciated. Expenditures for maintenance and repairs of assets in service are charged to Cost of services and products or Selling, general and administrative expense, as applicable. Retirements and disposals of assets are recorded by removing the original cost of the asset (along with the related accumulated depreciation) from plant in service and charging it, together with removal cost less any salvage realized, to Loss on asset disposals, net.
Costs of developing new information systems are capitalized and amortized over their expected economic useful lives.
Depreciation
TDS provides for depreciation using the straight-line method over the estimated useful life of the assets. TDS depreciates leasehold improvement assets associated with leased properties over periods ranging from one to thirty years; such periods approximate the shorter of the assets' economic lives or the specific lease terms.
Useful lives of specific assets are reviewed throughout the year to determine if changes in technology or other business changes would warrant accelerating the depreciation of those specific assets. U.S. Cellular and TDS Telecom did not materially change the useful lives of their property, plant and equipment in 2010, 2009 or 2008.
Impairment of Long-lived Assets
TDS reviews long-lived assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the assets might be impaired. The impairment test for tangible long-lived assets is a two-step process. The first step compares the carrying value of the asset (or asset group) with the estimated undiscounted cash flows over the remaining asset (or asset group) life. If the carrying value of the asset (or asset group) is greater than the undiscounted cash flows, the second step of the test is performed to measure the amount of impairment loss. The second step compares the carrying value of the asset to its
54
Telephone and Data Systems, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
NOTE 1 SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS (Continued)
estimated fair value. If the carrying value exceeds the estimated fair value (less cost to sell), an impairment loss is recognized for the difference.
Quoted market prices in active markets are the best evidence of fair value of a tangible long-lived asset and are used when available. If quoted market prices are not available, the estimate of fair value is based on the best information available, including prices for similar assets and the use of other valuation techniques. A present value analysis of cash flow scenarios is often the best available valuation technique. The use of this technique involves assumptions by management about factors that are uncertain including future cash flows, the appropriate discount rate, and other inputs. Different assumptions for these inputs could create materially different results.
Agent Liabilities
U.S. Cellular has relationships with agents, which are independent businesses that obtain customers for U.S. Cellular. At December 31, 2010 and 2009, U.S. Cellular had accrued $71.3 million and $55.2 million, respectively, for amounts due to agents. This amount is included in Other current liabilities in the Consolidated Balance Sheet.
Other Assets and Deferred Charges
Other assets and deferred charges primarily represent legal and other charges related to various borrowing instruments, and are amortized over the respective term of each instrument. The amounts for deferred charges included in the Consolidated Balance Sheet at December 31, 2010 and 2009 are shown net of accumulated amortization of $26.0 million and $23.0 million, respectively.
Asset Retirement Obligations
TDS accounts for asset retirement obligations by recording the fair value of a liability for legal obligations associated with an asset retirement in the period in which the obligations are incurred. At the time the liability is incurred, TDS records a liability equal to the net present value of the estimated cost of the asset retirement obligation and increases the carrying amount of the related long-lived asset by an equal amount. The liability is accreted to its present value over a period ending with the estimated settlement date of the respective asset retirement obligation. Upon settlement of the obligation, any difference between the cost to retire the asset and the recorded liability (including accretion of discount) is recognized in the Consolidated Statement of Operations.
Treasury Shares
Common Shares and Special Common Shares repurchased by TDS are recorded at cost as treasury shares and result in a reduction of equity. Treasury shares are reissued as part of TDS' stock-based compensation programs. When treasury shares are reissued, TDS determines the cost using the first-in, first-out cost method. The difference between the cost of the treasury shares and reissuance price is included in Capital in excess of par value or Retained earnings.
55
Telephone and Data Systems, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
NOTE 1 SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS (Continued)
Revenue Recognition
U.S. Cellular
Revenues from wireless operations consist primarily of:
Revenues related to wireless services and other value added services are recognized as services are rendered. Revenues billed in advance or in arrears of the services being provided are estimated and deferred or accrued, as appropriate.
Revenues from sales of equipment and accessories are recognized when title and risk of loss passes to the agent or end-user customer.
In October 2009, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2009-13, Multiple Deliverable Revenue Arrangementsa consensus of FASB Emerging Issues Task Force ("ASU 2009-13"). ASU 2009-13 provides for less restrictive separation criteria that must be met for a deliverable to be considered a separate unit of accounting. Additionally, under this Standard, there is a hierarchy for determining the selling price of a unit of accounting and consideration must be allocated using a relative-selling price method. U.S. Cellular is required to adopt the provisions of ASU 2009-13 on January 1, 2011, however elected to adopt the provisions as of October 1, 2010 on a retroactive basis to January 1, 2010. U.S. Cellular made this election due to certain new service offerings (Belief Plans) with multiple elements that were introduced in the fourth quarter of 2010. These new service offerings may include a combination of the following elements which are considered separate units of accounting under ASU 2009-13: wireless service (voice, messaging and data), wireless devices, phone replacement of such wireless handsets, and loyalty reward points that may be redeemed by customers for wireless products and services in future periods. The adoption of ASU 2009-13 on October 1, 2010 had no impact on any previously reported financial statement amounts for 2010 interim periods.
U.S. Cellular allocates revenue to each element of these service offerings accounted for under ASU 2009-13 using the relative selling price method. Under this method, arrangement consideration, which consists of the amounts billed to the customer net of any cash-based discounts, are allocated to each element on the basis of their relative selling price, on a stand-alone basis. Such stand-alone selling price is determined in accordance with the following hierarchy:
56
Telephone and Data Systems, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
NOTE 1 SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS (Continued)
U.S. Cellular estimates stand-alone selling prices of the elements of its new service offerings as follows:
U.S. Cellular follows the deferred revenue method of accounting for its loyalty reward program. Under this method, revenue allocated to loyalty reward points is deferred and recognized at the time the customer redeems loyalty reward points. U.S. Cellular does not have sufficient historical data in which to estimate any portion of loyalty reward points that will not be redeemed. As such, 100% of the value of the loyalty reward points is deferred until redeemed.
The introduction of these new service offerings in conjunction with the adoption of ASU 2009-13 required U.S. Cellular to defer the recognition of revenue related to amounts billed to customers that are attributed to loyalty reward points, and therefore impacted the timing of revenue recognition related to such service offerings. As of December 31, 2010, $7.1 million of revenue was deferred related to loyalty reward points outstanding as of this date. This amount was recorded in Customer deposits and deferred revenues (a current liability account) in the Consolidated Balance Sheet, as customers may redeem their reward points within the current period.
Cash-based discounts and incentives, including discounts to customers who pay their bills through the use of on-line bill payment methods, are recognized as a reduction of Operating revenues concurrently with the associated revenue, and are allocated to the various products and services in the bundled offering based on their respective relative selling price.
In order to provide better control over wireless device quality, U.S. Cellular sells wireless devices to agents. U.S. Cellular pays rebates to agents at the time an agent activates a new customer or retains an existing customer in a transaction involving a wireless device. U.S. Cellular accounts for these rebates by reducing revenues at the time of the wireless device sale to the agent rather than at the time the agent activates a new customer or retains a current customer. Similarly, U.S. Cellular offers certain wireless device sales rebates and incentives to its retail customers and records the revenue net of the corresponding rebate or incentive. The total potential rebates and incentives are reduced by U.S. Cellular's estimate of rebates that will not be redeemed by customers based on historical experience of such redemptions.