First Charter Corporation
Table of Contents

 
 
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
     
þ   QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2007
OR
     
o   TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
Commission File Number 0-15829
FIRST CHARTER CORPORATION
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)
     
North Carolina   56-1355866
(State or Other Jurisdiction of   (I.R.S. Employer
Incorporation or Organization)   Identification No.)
     
10200 David Taylor Drive, Charlotte, NC   28262-2373
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)   (Zip Code)
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (704) 688-4300
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of “accelerated filer and large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large Accelerated Filer þ          Accelerated Filer o          Non-Accelerated Filero
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.) Yes o No þ
As of August 1, 2007, the Registrant had outstanding 34,686,023 shares of Common Stock, no par value.
 
 

 


 

First Charter Corporation
FORM 10-Q
QUARTER ENDED JUNE 30, 2007
All reports filed electronically by First Charter Corporation with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”), including its annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, and current reports on Form 8-K, as well as any amendments to those reports, are accessible at no cost on the Corporations’ Web site at www.firstcharter.com. These filings are also accessible on the SEC’s Web site at www.sec.gov.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
                 
            Page  
Part I — Financial Information
Item 1.   Financial Statements:        
 
      Consolidated Balance Sheets     3  
 
      Consolidated Statements of Income     4  
 
      Consolidated Statements of Shareholders’ Equity     5  
 
      Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows     6  
 
      Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements     7  
Item 2.   Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations     28  
Item 3.   Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk     57  
Item 4.   Controls and Procedures     58  
 
               
Part II
Other Information
Item 1.   Legal Proceedings     59  
Item 1A.   Risk Factors     59  
Item 2.   Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds     59  
Item 3.   Defaults Upon Senior Securities     60  
Item 4.   Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders     60  
Item 5.   Other Information     60  
Item 6.   Exhibits     61  
               
 Exhibit 12.1
 Exhibit 31.1
 Exhibit 31.2
 Exhibit 32.1
 Exhibit 32.2

2


Table of Contents

PART 1. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
First Charter Corporation
Consolidated Balance Sheets
(Unaudited)
                 
   
    June 30     December 31  
(Dollars in thousands, except share data)   2007     2006  
 
Assets
               
Cash and due from banks
  $ 91,446     $ 87,771  
Federal funds sold
    22,495       10,515  
Interest-bearing bank deposits
    5,145       4,541  
 
Cash and cash equivalents
    119,086       102,827  
Securities available for sale (cost of $912,883 and $916,189 at June 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006, respectively)
    898,528       906,415  
Loans held for sale
    11,471       12,292  
Portfolio loans:
               
Commercial and construction
    2,272,151       2,129,569  
Mortgage
    589,976       618,142  
Consumer
    691,710       737,342  
 
Total portfolio loans
    3,553,837       3,485,053  
Allowance for loan losses
    (44,790 )     (34,966 )
 
Portfolio loans, net
    3,509,047       3,450,087  
Premises and equipment, net
    112,874       111,588  
Goodwill and other intangible assets
    84,107       85,068  
Other assets
    181,608       188,440  
 
Total Assets
  $ 4,916,721     $ 4,856,717  
 
Liabilities
               
Deposits:
               
Noninterest-bearing demand
  $ 480,078     $ 454,975  
Demand
    427,899       420,774  
Money market
    587,691       620,699  
Savings
    114,245       111,047  
Certificates of deposit
    1,620,433       1,640,633  
 
Total deposits
    3,230,346       3,248,128  
Federal funds purchased and securities sold under agreements to repurchase
    216,152       201,713  
Commercial paper and other short-term borrowings
    342,844       409,191  
Long-term debt
    617,762       487,794  
Accrued expenses and other liabilities
    63,789       62,529  
 
Total Liabilities
    4,470,893       4,409,355  
Shareholders’ Equity
               
Preferred stock — no par value; authorized 2,000,000 shares; no shares issued and outstanding
           
Common stock — no par value; authorized 100,000,000 shares; issued and outstanding 34,689,641 and 34,922,222 shares at June 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006, respectively
    225,139       231,602  
Common stock held in Rabbi Trust for deferred compensation
    (1,408 )     (1,226 )
Deferred compensation payable in common stock
    1,408       1,226  
Retained earnings
    229,379       221,678  
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
    (8,690 )     (5,918 )
 
Total Shareholders’ Equity
    445,828       447,362  
 
Total Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity
  $ 4,916,721     $ 4,856,717  
 
See notes to consolidated financial statements.

3


Table of Contents

First Charter Corporation
Consolidated Statements of Income
(Unaudited)
                                 
   
    Three Months Ended     Six Months Ended  
    June 30     June 30  
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts   2007     2006     2007     2006  
 
Interest income
                               
Loans
  $ 67,124     $ 54,123     $ 133,242     $ 104,383  
Securities
    11,058       9,522       21,976       18,833  
Federal funds sold
    48       37       176       73  
Interest-bearing bank deposits
    61       60       111       99  
 
Total interest income
    78,291       63,742       155,505       123,388  
Interest expense
                               
Deposits
    26,364       18,343       52,904       34,904  
Borrowings
    14,383       12,752       28,322       23,747  
 
Total interest expense
    40,747       31,095       81,226       58,651  
 
Net interest income
    37,544       32,647       74,279       64,737  
Provision for loan losses
    9,124       880       10,490       2,399  
 
Net interest income after provision for loan losses
    28,420       31,767       63,789       62,338  
Noninterest income
                               
Service charges on deposits
    7,942       7,469       15,332       14,167  
ATM, debit, and merchant fees
    2,636       2,117       5,080       4,015  
Wealth management
    944       693       1,660       1,393  
Equity method investments gains, net
    678       11       1,805       556  
Mortgage services
    1,056       812       1,957       1,335  
Gain on sale of Small Business Administration loans
    132             509        
Brokerage services
    1,007       692       2,088       1,403  
Insurance services
    3,422       2,898       7,056       7,232  
Bank owned life insurance
    1,162       850       2,301       1,677  
Property sale gains, net
    152       107       215       188  
Securities gains (losses), net
          32       (11 )     32  
Other
    1,010       611       1,715       1,285  
 
Total noninterest income
    20,141       16,292       39,707       33,283  
Noninterest expense
                               
Salaries and employee benefits
    19,576       16,343       39,163       33,543  
Occupancy and equipment
    4,759       4,826       9,371       9,531  
Data processing
    1,492       1,448       3,282       2,858  
Marketing
    1,055       1,196       2,406       2,484  
Postage and supplies
    1,164       1,282       2,336       2,464  
Professional services
    3,181       2,258       6,767       4,161  
Telecommunications
    519       513       1,190       1,076  
Amortization of intangibles
    314       107       537       209  
Foreclosed properties
    226       418       379       472  
Other
    2,921       2,297       5,696       4,631  
 
Total noninterest expense
    35,207       30,688       71,127       61,429  
 
Income from continuing operations before income tax expense
    13,354       17,371       32,369       34,192  
Income tax expense
    4,404       5,946       11,063       11,614  
 
Income from continuing operations, net of tax
    8,950       11,425       21,306       22,578  
Discontinued operations
                               
Income from discontinued operations before gain on sale and income tax expense
          50             198  
Income tax expense
          20             78  
 
Income from discontinued operations, net of tax
          30             120  
 
Net income
  $ 8,950     $ 11,455     $ 21,306     $ 22,698  
 
Net income per common share
                               
Basic
                               
Income from continuing operations, net of tax
  $ 0.26     $ 0.37     $ 0.61     $ 0.73  
Income from discontinued operations, net of tax
                       
Net income
    0.26       0.37       0.61       0.73  
Diluted
                               
Income from continuing operations, net of tax
  $ 0.26     $ 0.37     $ 0.61     $ 0.72  
Income from discontinued operations, net of tax
                       
Net income
    0.26       0.37       0.61       0.73  
Average common shares outstanding
                               
Basic
    34,698       31,059       34,734       30,960  
Diluted
    34,987       31,339       35,036       31,249  
Dividends declared per common share
  $ 0.195     $ 0.195     $ 0.390     $ 0.385  
 
See notes to consolidated financial statements.

4


Table of Contents

First Charter Corporation
Consolidated Statements of Shareholders’ Equity
(Unaudited)
                                                         
   
                    Common Stock                            
                    in Rabbi     Deferred             Accumulated        
                    Trust for     Compensation             Other        
(Dollars in thousands, except   Common Stock     Deferred     Payable in     Retained     Comprehensive        
share and per share amounts)   Shares     Amount     Compensation     Common Stock     Earnings     Loss     Total  
 
Balance, December 31, 2006
    34,922,222     $ 231,602     $ (1,226 )   $ 1,226     $ 221,678     $ (5,918 )   $ 447,362  
Comprehensive income:
                                                       
Net income
                            21,306             21,306  
Change in unrealized gains and losses on securities, net of reclassificiation adjustment for net losses included in net income
                                  (2,772 )     (2,772 )
 
                                                     
Total comprehensive income
                                                    18,534  
Cummulative transaction adjustment for FIN 48
                            29             29  
Common stock purchased by Rabbi Trust for deferred compensation
                (182 )                       (182 )
Deferred compensation payable in common stock
                      182                     182  
Cash dividends declared, $0.39 per share
                              (13,634 )           (13,634 )
Issuance of shares under stock-based compensation plans, including related tax effects
    256,787       4,889                               4,889  
Repurchase of common stock
    (500,000 )     (10,626 )                             (10,626 )
Issuance of shares pursuant to acquisition
    10,632       (726 )                             (726 )
 
Balance, June 30, 2007
    34,689,641     $ 225,139     $ (1,408 )   $ 1,408     $ 229,379     $ (8,690 )   $ 445,828  
 
See notes to consolidated financial statements.

5


Table of Contents

First Charter Corporation
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(Unaudited)
                 
   
    Six Months Ended  
    June 30  
(In thousands)   2007     2006  
 
Operating activities
               
Net income
  $ 21,306     $ 22,698  
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
               
Provision for loan losses
    10,490       2,399  
Depreciation
    3,845       4,761  
Amortization of intangibles
    537       304  
Amortization of servicing rights
    173       201  
Stock-based compensation expense
    1,787       1,068  
Tax benefits from stock-based compensation plans
    (137 )     (328 )
Premium amortization and discount accretion, net
    199       579  
Securities (gains) losses, net
    11       (32 )
Net gains on sales of other real estate owned
    (101 )     (89 )
Write-downs on other real estate owned
    278       355  
Equity method investment gains, net
    (1,805 )     (556 )
Gains on sales of loans held for sale
    (1,459 )     (776 )
Gains on sale of Small Business Administration loans
    (509 )      
Property sale gains, net
    (215 )     (188 )
Origination of loans held for sale
    (140,022 )     (93,448 )
Proceeds from sale of loans held for sale
    142,302       92,290  
Change in cash surrender value of life insurance
    (398 )     1,677  
Change in other assets
    5,545       (5,062 )
Change in other liabilities
    1,449       308  
 
Net cash provided by operating activities
    43,276       26,161  
Investing activities
               
Proceeds from sales of securities available for sale
    25,180       24,603  
Proceeds from maturities, calls and paydowns of securities available for sale
    126,006       48,719  
Purchases of securities available for sale
    (148,079 )     (69,174 )
Net change in loans
    (70,119 )     (130,822 )
Proceeds from sales of other real estate owned
    4,242       1,170  
Net purchases of premises and equipment
    (5,131 )     (5,232 )
 
Net cash used in investing activities
    (67,901 )     (130,736 )
Financing activities
               
Net change in deposits
    (17,782 )     189,323  
Net change in federal funds purchased and securities sold under repurchase agreements
    14,439       (92,460 )
Net change in commercial paper and other short-term borrowings
    (66,347 )     (65,374 )
Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt and trust preferred securities
    240,000       220,000  
Retirement of long-term debt
    (110,032 )     (135,032 )
Proceeds from issuance of common stock
    4,752       3,721  
Purchases of common stock
    (10,626 )      
Tax benefits from stock-based compensation plans
    137       328  
Cash dividends paid
    (13,657 )     (10,147 )
 
Net cash provided by financing activities
    40,884       110,359  
 
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents
    16,259       5,784  
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
    102,827       125,552  
 
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
  $ 119,086     $ 131,336  
 
Supplemental information
               
Cash paid for:
               
Interest
  $ 79,570     $ 55,949  
Income taxes
    10,215       11,875  
Non-cash items:
               
Transfer of loans to other real estate owned
    669       2,674  
Unrealized losses on securities available for sale (net of tax benefit of $1,810, and $3,968, respectively)
    (2,772 )     (6,079 )
Issuance of common stock for business acquisition
    (726 )     362  
 
 
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
               

6


Table of Contents

First Charter Corporation
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
First Charter Corporation (“First Charter” or the “Corporation”), headquartered in Charlotte, North Carolina, is a regional financial services company with assets of $4.9 billion and is the holding company for First Charter Bank (the “Bank”). As of June 30, 2007, First Charter operated 58 financial centers, four insurance offices, and 138 ATMs throughout North Carolina and Georgia. First Charter also operates loan origination offices in Asheville, North Carolina and Reston, Virginia. First Charter provides businesses and individuals with a broad range of financial services, including banking, financial planning, wealth management, investments, insurance, and mortgages. The results of operations of the Bank constitute the substantial majority of the consolidated net income, revenue, and assets of the Corporation.
1. Accounting Policies
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Corporation and its wholly-owned subsidiary, the Bank, and variable interest entities where the Corporation is the primary beneficiary. All significant intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated.
The information contained in these interim consolidated financial statements, excluding the consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2006, is unaudited. The information furnished has been prepared pursuant to United States Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) Rule 10-01 of Regulation S-X and does not include all the information and note disclosures required to be included in annual financial statements prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America.
The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the Corporation’s audited financial statements and accompanying notes in the Corporation’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006, filed with the SEC on April 5, 2007.
The unaudited results of operations for the interim periods shown in these financial statements are not necessarily indicative of operating results for the entire year. The information furnished in this report reflects all adjustments, which are, in the opinion of management, necessary to present a fair statement of the financial condition and the results of operations for interim periods. All such adjustments are of a normal and recurring nature. Certain amounts reported in prior periods have been reclassified to conform to the current-period presentation. Such reclassifications have no effect on net income or shareholders’ equity as previously reported.
The significant accounting policies followed by the Corporation are presented on pages 69 to 76 of the Corporation’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006. With the exception of the Corporation’s adoption of certain of the accounting pronouncements discussed in Note 2, these policies have not materially changed from the disclosure in that report.
2. Recent Accounting Pronouncements
Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities: In February 2007, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (“SFAS”) No. 159, The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities – Including an Amendment of FASB Statement No. 115. This standard permits an entity to choose to measure many financial instruments and certain other items at fair value. This option is available to all entities. Most of the provisions in SFAS 159 are elective; however, the amendment to SFAS 115, Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities, applies to all entities with available-for-sale and trading securities. The FASB’s stated objective in issuing this standard is “to improve financial reporting by

7


Table of Contents

providing entities with the opportunity to mitigate volatility in reported earnings caused by measuring related assets and liabilities differently without having to apply complex hedge accounting provisions.”
The fair value option established by SFAS 159 permits all entities to choose to measure eligible items at fair value at specified election dates. A business entity will report unrealized gains and losses on items for which the fair value option has been elected in earnings at each subsequent reporting date. The fair value option: (a) may be applied instrument by instrument, with a few exceptions, such as investments otherwise accounted for by the equity method; (b) is irrevocable (unless a new election date occurs); and (c) is applied only to entire instruments and not to portions of instruments.
SFAS 159 is effective as of the beginning of an entity’s first fiscal year that begins after November 15, 2007. The Corporation is currently evaluating the impact, if any, SFAS 159 will have on the Corporation’s consolidated financial statements.
Fair Value Measurements: In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS 157, Fair Value Measurements, which replaces the different definitions of fair value in existing accounting literature with a single definition, sets out a framework for measuring fair value, and requires additional disclosures about fair value measurements. SFAS 157 is required to be applied whenever another financial accounting standard requires or permits an asset or liability to be measured at fair value. The Corporation will adopt the guidance of SFAS 157 beginning January 1, 2008, and does not expect it to have a material impact on the Corporation’s consolidated financial statements.
Accounting for Servicing of Financial Assets: In March 2006, the FASB issued SFAS 156, Accounting for Servicing of Financial Assets – an Amendment of FASB Statement No. 140. SFAS 156 requires entities to separately recognize a servicing asset or liability whenever it undertakes an obligation to service financial assets and also requires all separately recognized servicing assets or liabilities to be initially measured at fair value. Additionally, this standard permits entities to choose among two alternatives, the amortization method or fair value measurement method, for the subsequent measurement of each class of separately recognized servicing assets and liabilities. Under the amortization method, an entity amortizes the value of servicing assets or liabilities in proportion to and over the period of estimated net servicing income or net servicing loss and assesses servicing assets or liabilities for impairment or increased obligation based on fair value at each reporting date. Under the fair value measurement method, an entity measures servicing assets or liabilities at fair value at each reporting date and reports changes in fair value in earnings in the period in which the changes occur. The Corporation adopted SFAS 156 as of January 1, 2007, and elected the amortization method. The initial adoption of SFAS 156 did not have an impact on the Corporation’s consolidated financial statements.
Accounting for Certain Hybrid Financial Instruments: In February 2006, the FASB issued SFAS 155, Accounting for Certain Hybrid Financial Instruments – an Amendment of FASB Statements No. 133 and 140. SFAS 155 requires entities to evaluate and identify whether interests in securitized financial assets are freestanding derivatives, hybrid financial instruments that contain an embedded derivative requiring bifurcation, or hybrid financial instruments that contain embedded derivatives that do not require bifurcation. SFAS 155 also permits fair value measurement for any hybrid financial instrument that contains an embedded derivative that otherwise would require bifurcation. SFAS 155 was adopted by the Corporation as of January 1, 2007 and the statement is effective for all financial instruments acquired or issued by the Corporation on or after the date of adoption. The adoption of SFAS 155 did not have an impact on the Corporation’s consolidated financial statements.
In June 2006, the FASB issued Interpretation (“FIN”) 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes—an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109. The interpretation addresses the determination of whether tax benefits claimed or expected to be claimed on a tax return should be recorded in the financial statements. Pursuant to FIN 48, the Corporation may recognize the tax benefit from an uncertain tax position only if it is more likely than not that the tax position will be sustained on examination by the taxing authorities, based on the technical merits of the position. FIN 48 requires the tax benefits recognized in the financial statements to be measured based on the largest benefit that has a greater than fifty percent likelihood to

8


Table of Contents

be realized upon ultimate settlement. FIN 48 also provides guidance regarding derecognition of tax benefits, interest and penalties related to tax deficiencies, and requires additional income tax disclosures. The Corporation adopted the provisions of FIN 48 as of January 1, 2007 and the adoption did not have a material impact on the Corporation’s consolidated financial statements.
As a result of various tax strategies of the Corporation, the amount of unrecognized tax benefits as of January 1, 2007 was $11.2 million, of which $10.3 million would impact the Corporation’s effective tax rate, if recognized. While it is possible that the unrecognized tax benefit could change significantly during the next year, it is reasonably possible that the Company will recognize approximately $0.4 million of unrecognized tax benefits as a result of the expiration of the relevant statute of limitations.
Consistent with prior reporting periods, the Corporation recognizes interest accrued in connection with unrecognized tax benefits, net of related tax benefits, and penalties in income tax expense in the consolidated statements of income. As of January 1, 2007, the date the Corporation adopted FIN 48, the Corporation had accrued approximately $0.8 million for the payment of interest and penalties. As of June 30, 2007, the Corporation had accrued approximately $0.8 million for the payment of interest and penalties.
The Corporation is under examination by the North Carolina Department of Revenue (the “DOR”) for tax years 1999 through 2004 and is subject to examination for subsequent tax years. As a result of the examination, the DOR issued a proposed tax assessment, including an estimate for accrued interest, of $3.7 million for tax years 1999 and 2000. The Corporation is currently appealing the proposed assessment. The Corporation estimates that the maximum tax liability that may be asserted by the DOR for tax years 1999 through the current tax year is approximately $15.1 million in excess of amounts reserved, net of federal tax benefit. The Corporation would disagree with such potential liability, if assessed, and would intend to continue to defend its position. The Corporation believes its current tax reserves are adequate.
There can be no assurance regarding the ultimate outcome of this matter, the timing of its resolution or the eventual loss or penalties that may result from it, which may be more or less than the amounts reserved by the Corporation.
The Corporation is also under examination by the Internal Revenue Service for the 2004 tax year. The examination is of a routine nature and is not the result of any prior tax position taken by the Corporation. The Corporation’s tax years prior to 2003 are no longer subject to examination by the Internal Revenue Service.
Accounting for Purchases of Life Insurance: In September 2006, the FASB ratified Emerging Issues Task Force (“EITF”) Issue No. 06-5, Accounting for Purchases of Life Insurance – Determining the Amount That Could Be Realized in Accordance with FASB Technical Bulletin No. 85-4. The EITF reached a consensus that a policyholder should consider any additional amounts included in the contractual terms of the policy when determining the amount that could be realized under the insurance contract. The Task Force also reached a consensus that a policyholder should determine the amount that could be realized under the life insurance contract assuming the surrender of an individual-life by individual-life policy (or certificate by certificate in a group policy). Furthermore, the Task Force reached a consensus that the cash surrender value should not be discounted when contractual limitations on the ability to surrender a policy exist if the policy continues to operate under its normal terms (continues to earn interest) during the restriction period. The Corporation adopted EITF No. 06-5 as of January 1, 2007, and the adoption did not have a material impact on the Corporation’s consolidated financial statements.
Effects of Prior-Year Misstatements: In September 2006, the SEC issued Staff Accounting Bulletin (“SAB”) 108, Considering the Effects of Prior Year Misstatements when Quantifying Misstatements in Current Year Financial Statements. SAB 108 provides guidance on the consideration of the effects of prior-year misstatements in quantifying current-year misstatements for the purpose of a materiality assessment. In December 2006, the Corporation adopted the provisions of SAB 108. The Corporation’s

9


Table of Contents

Annual Report on Form 10-K contains further disclosure related to the adoption of SAB 108 in Note 3 to the consolidated financial statements. The impact of the Corporation’s SAB 108 adjustments as of and for the three months and six months ended and June 30, 2006, is summarized below:
                         
   
    As of and for the Three Months Ended  
    June 30, 2006  
    Before             As  
(in thousands, except per share data)   Adjustment     Adjustment     Adjusted  
 
Other assets
  $ 167,149     $ (2,043 )   $ 165,106  
Other liabilities
    41,830       994       42,824  
Shareholders’ equity
    336,935       (3,037 )     333,898  
Mortgage services revenue
    916       (104 )     812  
Total noninterest income
    16,396       (104 )     16,292  
Salaries and employee benefits expense
    16,297       46       16,343  
Total noninterest expense
    30,642       46       30,688  
Total income tax expense
    6,025       (59 )     5,966  
Net income
    11,546       (91 )     11,455  
Diluted earnings per share
    0.37             0.37  
 
                         
   
    As of and for the Six Months Ended  
    June 30, 2006  
    Before             As  
(in thousands, except per share data)   Adjustment     Adjustment     Adjusted  
 
Other assets
  $ 167,149     $ (2,043 )   $ 165,106  
Other liabilities
    41,830       994       42,824  
Shareholders’ equity
    336,935       (3,037 )     333,898  
Mortgage services revenue
    1,724       (389 )     1,335  
Total noninterest income
    33,672       (389 )     33,283  
Salaries and employee benefits expense
    33,451       92       33,543  
Total noninterest expense
    61,337       92       61,429  
Total income tax expense
    11,881       (189 )     11,692  
Net income
    22,990       (292 )     22,698  
Diluted earnings per share
    0.74       (0.01 )     0.73  
 
3. Acquisitions and Divestitures
Acquisition of GBC Bancorp, Inc. On November 1, 2006, the Corporation completed its acquisition of GBC Bancorp, Inc. (“GBC”), parent of Gwinnett Banking Company (“Gwinnett Bank”), headquartered in Lawrenceville, Georgia. The assets and liabilities of GBC were recorded on the Corporation’s balance sheet at their estimated fair values as of the acquisition date, and their results of operations were included in the consolidated statements of income from that date forward.
The Corporation continues to finalize the valuations of certain assets and liabilities, including intangible assets. During the six months ended June 30, 2007, the Corporation made certain refinements to its initial allocation of the GBC purchase price, including a $1.0 million adjustment to the purchase price as the stock price paid upon acquisition was adjusted for EITF 99-12, Determination of the Measurement Date for the Market Price of Acquirer Securities Issued in a Purchase Business Combination. The following table shows the excess of the purchase price over capitalized merger costs and carrying value of net assets acquired, the initial purchase price allocation and the resulting goodwill as of the date of the acquisition, subsequent purchase price refinements, and the adjusted purchase price allocation at June 30, 2007.

10


Table of Contents

                         
   
    Initial             Adjusted  
    Purchase     Purchase     Purchase  
    Price     Price     Price  
(In thousands)   Allocation     Refinements     Allocation  
 
Purchase price
  $ 103,221     $ (982 )   $ 102,239  
Capitalized merger costs
    1,211       88       1,299  
Carrying value of net assets acquired
    39,869             39,869  
 
Excess of the purchase price over capitalized merger costs and carrying value of net assets acquired
    64,563       (894 )     63,669  
Purchase accounting adjustments:
                       
Securities
    241             241  
Loans
    643       (108 )     535  
Deferred taxes
    794             794  
Certificates of deposit
          33       33  
 
Subtotal
    1,678       (75 )     1,603  
 
Core deposit intangibles
    (3,091 )     (469 )     (3,560 )
Other identifiable intangible assets
    (1,186 )     238       (948 )
 
Goodwill
  $ 61,964     $ (1,200 )   $ 60,764  
 
Sale of Southeastern Employee Benefits Services. On December 1, 2006, the Corporation completed the sale of Southeastern Employee Benefits Services (“SEBS”), the sole component of its former employee benefits administration business, to an independent third-party administrator for $3.1 million in cash. The results of SEBS are presented as Discontinued Operations for all periods presented. Condensed financial statements for discontinued operations are presented below.
                 
   
    Six Months Ended  
    June 30  
(In thousands)   2007     2006  
 
Noninterest income
  $     $ 1,809  
Noninterest expense
          1,611  
 
Income from discontinued operations before tax
          198  
Gain on sale
           
Income tax expense
          78  
 
Income from discontinued operations, after tax
  $     $ 120  
 
On December 1, 2004, the Corporation acquired substantially all of the assets of Smith & Associates Insurance Services Inc., a property and casualty insurance agency (the “Agency”). In connection with this transaction, the Corporation has previously issued to the Agency an aggregate of 42,198 shares of common were valued at $1.1 million. On May 1, 2007, pursuant to the purchase agreement and based upon the performance of the business for the period of December 1, 2005 through November 30, 2006, the Corporation issued 10,632 additional shares of Common Stock valued at $0.3 million to the Agency. One additional issuance, based upon the future performance of the acquired business, is expected to total approximately $0.2 million, if earned.
4. Net Income Per Share
Basic net income per share is computed by dividing net income by the weighted average number of shares of the Corporation’s common stock outstanding for the three and six months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively. Diluted net income per share reflects the potential dilution that could occur if the Corporation’s potential common stock equivalents and contingently issuable shares, which consist of dilutive stock options, restricted stock, and performance shares, were issued.

11


Table of Contents

A reconciliation of the basic average common shares outstanding to the diluted average common shares outstanding follows:
                                 
   
    Three Months Ended     Six Months Ended  
    June 30     June 30  
    2007     2006     2007     2006  
 
Basic weighted-average number of common shares outstanding
    34,697,944       31,058,858       34,733,825       30,959,711  
Dilutive effect arising from potential common stock issuances
    288,718       280,467       302,190       289,338  
 
Diluted weighted-average number of common shares outstanding
    34,986,662       31,339,325       35,036,015       31,249,049  
 
The effects of outstanding anti-dilutive stock options are excluded from the computation of diluted net income per share. These amounts were 454,329 and 436,568 shares for the three and six months ended June 30, 2007, respectively. The amounts were 257,667 and 259,185 shares for the three and six months ended June 30, 2006, respectively.
Dividends declared by the Corporation were $0.195 per share for the three months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006. For the six months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006 dividends declared by the Corporation were $0.39 per share and $0.385 per share, respectively.
5. Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
A summary of the gross carrying amount and accumulated amortization of amortized intangible assets and the net carrying amount of unamortized intangible assets follows:
                                                 
   
    June 30, 2007     December 31, 2006  
    Gross             Net     Gross             Net  
    Carrying     Accumulated     Carrying     Carrying     Accumulated     Carrying  
(In thousands)   Amount     Amortization     Amount     Amount     Amortization     Amount  
 
Amortized intangible assets from continuing operations:
                                               
Core deposits
  $ 3,560     $ 475     $ 3,085     $ 3,091     $ 200     $ 2,891  
Noncompete agreements
    90       78       12       90       63       27  
Customer lists
    2,487       1,424       1,063       2,359       1,177       1,182  
 
Total Amortized Intangible Assets
    6,137       1,977       4,160       5,540       1,440       4,100  
 
 
                                               
Goodwill
    79,947       N/A       79,947       80,968       N/A       80,968  
 
 
                                               
Total goodwill and amortized intangible assets
  $ 86,084     $ 1,977     $ 84,107     $ 86,508     $ 1,440     $ 85,068  
 
The gross carrying amount of core deposit intangibles increased to $3.6 million at June 30, 2007, from $3.1 million at December 31, 2006, and goodwill decreased to $79.9 million at June 30, 2007 from $81.0 million at December 31, 2006. These changes are primarily due to refinements made in the purchase accounting for the GBC acquisition. Refer to Note 3 for further discussion of the GBC purchase accounting adjustments.
The gross carrying amount of customer lists increased to $2.5 million at June 30, 2007 from $2.4 million at December 31, 2006 due to a contractual payment made in connection with the acquisition of Smith & Associates Insurance Services, Inc.

12


Table of Contents

Amortization expense from continuing and discontinued operations follows:
                 
   
    Six Months Ended  
    June 30  
(In thousands)   2007     2006  
 
Continuing operations
  $ 537     $ 209  
Discontinued operations
          95  
 
Total intangibles amortization expense
  $ 537     $ 304  
 
Expected future amortization expense on finite-lived intangible assets follows:
                               
   
    Core     Noncompete     Customer      
(In thousands)   Deposits     Agreements     Lists   Total  
   
July 1 - December 31 ,2007
  $ 333     $ 12     $ 215   $ 560  
2008
    608             344     952  
2009
    531             229     760  
2010
    453             117     570  
2011
    375             68     443  
2012 and after
    785             90     875  
   
Total intangibles amortization
  $ 3,085     $ 12     $ 1,063   $ 4,160  
 
6. Comprehensive Income
Comprehensive income is defined as the change in shareholders’ equity from all transactions other than those with shareholders, and it includes net income and other comprehensive income.
The components of comprehensive income follow:
                                 
   
    Three Months Ended     Six Months Ended  
    June 30     June 30  
    2007     2006     2007     2006  
 
Comprehensive income
                               
Net Income
  $ 8,950     $ 11,455     $ 21,306     $ 22,698  
Other comprehensive loss
                               
Unrealized losses on available-for-sale securities, net
    (5,538 )     (8,542 )     (4,593 )     (10,015 )
Reclassification adjustment for gain/(losses) included in net income
          32       (11 )     32  
Income tax effect, net
    (2,188 )     (3,385 )     (1,810 )     (3,968 )
 
Other comprehensive loss
    (3,350 )     (5,189 )     (2,772 )     (6,079 )
 
Total comprehensive income
  $ 5,600     $ 6,266     $ 18,534     $ 16,619  
 

13


Table of Contents

7. Securities Available for Sale
Securities available for sale are summarized as follows:
                                 
   
    June 30, 2007  
    Amortized     Unrealized     Unrealized     Fair  
(In thousands)   Cost     Gains     Losses     Value  
 
U.S. government agency obligations
  $ 238,155     $ 41     $ 1,494     $ 236,702  
Mortgage-backed securities
    469,821       149       11,466       458,504  
State, county, and municipal obligations
    92,474       386       671       92,189  
Asset-backed securities
    57,767       155       1,865       56,057  
Equity securities
    54,666       438       28       55,076  
 
Total securities
  $ 912,883     $ 1,169     $ 15,524     $ 898,528  
 
                                 
   
    December 31, 2006  
    Amortized     Unrealized     Unrealized     Fair  
(In thousands)   Cost     Gains     Losses     Value  
 
U.S. government agency obligations
  $ 278,106     $ 358     $ 3,070     $ 275,394  
Mortgage-backed securities
    419,824       768       8,572       412,020  
State, county, and municipal obligations
    102,221       745       364       102,602  
Asset-backed securities
    65,141       11       37       65,115  
Equity securities
    50,897       387             51,284  
 
Total securities
  $ 916,189     $ 2,269     $ 12,043     $ 906,415  
 
The contractual maturity distribution and yields (computed on a taxable-equivalent basis) of the Corporation’s securities portfolio at June 30, 2007, are summarized below. Actual maturities may differ from contractual maturities shown below, as borrowers may have the right to pre-pay these obligations without pre-payment penalties.
                                                                                 
   
                    Due after 1     Due after 5              
    Due in 1 year     through 5     through 10     Due after        
    or less     years     years     10 years     Total  
(Dollars in thousands)   Amount     Yield     Amount     Yield     Amount     Yield     Amount     Yield     Amount     Yield  
 
Fair value of securities available for sale
                                                                               
U.S. government agency obligations
  $ 130,804       3.76 %   $ 98,245       4.72 %   $ 7,653       5.56 %   $       %   $ 236,702       4.22 %
Mortgage-backed securities (1)
    4,351       4.77       354,130       5.00       89,942       4.96       10,081       5.76       458,504       5.01  
State and municipal obligations (2)
    10,797       7.11       31,044       5.69       13,284       6.14       37,064       5.76       92,189       5.95  
Asset-backed securities
                24,503       7.53       9,900       6.70       21,654       7.41       56,057       7.34  
Equity securities (3)
                                        55,076       5.77       55,076       5.77  
 
Total
  $ 145,952       4.04 %   $ 507,922       5.11 %   $ 120,779       5.27 %   $ 123,875       6.05 %   $ 898,528       5.09 %
 
Amortized cost of securities available for sale
  $ 146,489             $ 518,030             $ 123,405             $ 124,959             $ 912,883          
 
(1)  
Maturities estimated based on average life of security.
 
(2)  
Yields on tax-exempt securities are calculated on a tax-equivalent basis using the marginal Federal income tax rate of 35 percent.
 
(3)  
Although equity securities have no stated maturity, they are presented for illustrative purposes only. The 5.77% yield represents the expected dividend yield to be earned on equity securities, principally investments in Federal Home Loan Bank of Atlanta and Federal Reserve Bank Stock.
Securities with an aggregate carrying value of $704.6 million and $632.9 million at June 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006, respectively, were pledged to secure public deposits, securities sold under agreements to repurchase, and Federal Home Loan Bank (“FHLB”) borrowings.

14


Table of Contents

Gross gains and losses recognized on the sale of securities are summarized as follows:
                                 
   
    Three Months Ended     Six Months Ended  
    June 30     June 30  
(In thousands)   2007     2006     2007     2006  
 
Gross gains
  $     $ 32     $ 94     $ 32  
Gross losses
                (105 )      
 
Securities gains (losses), net
  $     $ 32     $ (11 )   $ 32  
 
At June 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006, the Bank owned stock in the Federal Home Loan Bank of Atlanta with a cost basis (par value) of $44.9 million and $44.3 million, respectively, which is included in equity securities. While these securities have no quoted fair value, they are redeemable at par value from the FHLB. In addition, the Bank owned Federal Reserve Bank stock with a cost basis (par value) of $8.3 million and $5.6 million at June 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006, respectively, which is also included in equity securities.
There were no write-downs for other-than-temporary declines in the fair value of debt and equity securities for the three and six months ended June 30, 2007 or 2006.
As of June 30, 2007, there were no issues of securities available for sale (excluding U.S. government agency obligations), which had carrying values that exceeded 10 percent of shareholders’ equity of the Corporation.
U.S. government agency obligations of $206.2 million were considered temporarily impaired at June 30, 2007. U.S. government agency obligations are interest-bearing debt securities of U.S. government agencies (i.e., FNMA and FHLMC). At June 30, 2007, mortgage-backed securities of $418.1 million were considered temporarily impaired. The Corporation’s mortgage-backed securities are investment grade securities backed by a pool of mortgages. Principal and interest payments on the underlying mortgages are used to pay monthly interest and principal on the securities. State, county, and municipal obligations of $27.5 million were considered temporarily impaired at June 30, 2007. Asset-backed securities of $42.9 million were considered temporarily impaired at June 30, 2007. These obligations are collateralized debt obligations, representing securitizations of financial company capital securities. Equity securities of $0.5 million were considered temporarily impaired at June 30, 2007.
The unrealized losses at June 30, 2007, shown in the following table resulted primarily from an increase in rates across the yield curve.
                                                 
   
    Less than 12 months     12 months or longer     Total  
    Fair     Unrealized     Fair     Unrealized     Fair     Unrealized  
(In thousands)   Value     Losses     Value     Losses     Value     Losses  
 
AAA/AA-RATED SECURITIES
                                               
U.S. government agency obligations
  $ 47,600     $ 101     $ 158,574     $ 1,393     $ 206,174     $ 1,494  
Mortgage-backed securities
    187,677       1,689       230,436       9,777       418,113       11,466  
State, county, and muncipal obligations
    9,595       136       17,911       535       27,506       671  
 
Total AAA/AA-rated securities
    244,872       1,926       406,921       11,705       651,793       13,631  
A/BBB-RATED SECURITIES
                                               
Asset-backed securities
    42,903       1,865                   42,903       1,865  
 
Total A/BBB-rated securities
    42,903       1,865                   42,903       1,865  
UNRATED SECURITIES
                                               
Equity securities
    472       28                   472       28  
 
Total unrated securities
    472       28                   472       28  
 
Total temporarily impaired securities
  $ 288,247     $ 3,819     $ 406,921     $ 11,705     $ 695,168     $ 15,524  
 

15


Table of Contents

At June 30, 2007, investments in a gross unrealized loss position included 26 U.S. agency securities, 68 mortgage-backed securities, 34 municipal obligations, and six asset-backed securities. The unrealized losses associated with these securities were not considered to be other-than-temporary, because they were related to changes in interest rates and did not affect the expected cash flows of the underlying collateral or the issuer. At June 30, 2007, the Corporation had the ability and the intent to hold these investments to recovery of fair market value. The Corporation’s available-for-sale securities portfolio also contains one equity security in an unrealized loss position. This equity security began trading publicly in the first quarter of 2007 and the stock price has decreased, resulting in an unrealized loss.
8. Loans and Allowance for Loan Losses
The Bank primarily makes commercial and installment loans to customers throughout its primary market area, which includes the states of North Carolina, South Carolina, and Georgia, and predominately centers on the metro regions of Charlotte and Raleigh, North Carolina, and Atlanta, Georgia. The real estate loan portfolio can be affected by the condition of the local real estate markets. At June 30, 2007, the majority of the total loan portfolio was to borrowers within this market area. The diversity of this market area’s economic base provides a stable lending environment.
Portfolio loans are categorized as follows:
                                 
 
    June 30, 2007   December 31, 2006
(Dollars in thousands)   Amount   Percent   Amount   Percent
 
Commercial real estate
  $ 1,094,866       30.8 %   $ 1,034,317       29.7 %
Commercial non real estate
    317,984       8.9       301,958       8.7  
Construction
    859,301       24.2       793,294       22.8  
Mortgage
    589,976       16.6       618,142       17.7  
Home equity
    415,705       11.7       447,849       12.8  
Consumer
    276,005       7.8       289,493       8.3  
 
Total portfolio loans
  $ 3,553,837       100.0 %   $ 3,485,053       100.0 %
 
A summary of changes in the allowance for loan losses follows:
                                 
 
    Three Months Ended   Six Months Ended
    June 30   June 30
(In thousands)   2007   2006   2007   2006
 
Balance, beginning of period
  $ 35,854     $ 29,505     $ 34,966     $ 28,725  
Provision for loan losses
    9,124       880       10,490       2,399  
Charge-offs
    (547 )     (1,135 )     (1,333 )     (2,364 )
Recoveries
    359       270       667       760  
 
Net charge-offs
    (188 )     (865 )     (666 )     (1,604 )
 
Balance, June 30
  $ 44,790     $ 29,520     $ 44,790     $ 29,520  
 
The table below summarizes the Corporation’s nonperforming assets.
                 
 
    June 30   December 31
(In thousands)   2007   2006
 
Nonaccrual loans
  $ 17,387     $ 8,200  
Loans 90 days or more past due and accruing interest
           
 
Total nonperforming loans
    17,387       8,200  
Other real estate
    2,726       6,477  
 
Total nonperforming assets
  $ 20,113     $ 14,677  
 

16


Table of Contents

At June 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006, impaired loans amounted to $8.8 million and $1.0 million, respectively. Included in the allowance for loan losses was $1.2 million and $0.3 million related to the impaired loans at June 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006, respectively. Beginning January 1, 2007, the Corporation began including consumer and residential mortgage loans with outstanding principal balances of $150,000 or greater in its computation of impaired loans calculated under SFAS 114, Accounting by Creditors for Impairment of a Loan — an Amendment to FASB Statements No. 5 and No. 15. The application of this methodology conforms the consumer and residential mortgage loan analysis to the Corporation’s SFAS 114 analysis for commercial loans. Included in the $8.8 million of total impaired loans at June 30, 2007 were $3.4 million of consumer and residential mortgage loans. Had this methodology been applied at December 31, 2006, the impaired loan balance would have been $4.0 million.
During the second quarter of 2007, the North Carolina Attorney General obtained a court order to appoint a receiver to take control of a real estate venture in Western North Carolina. The Attorney General’s complaint alleges that various defendants, including real estate development companies, individuals, and an appraiser engaged in deceptive practices to induce consumers to obtain loans to purchase lots in The Village of Penland and related development projects (“Penland”) in the Spruce Pine, North Carolina area. These lots were allegedly priced based upon inflated appraisals. Several financial institutions, including First Charter, made loans in connection with these residential developments.
As of June 30, 2007, the Corporation had 70 loans with an aggregate outstanding balance of $14.1 million to individual lot purchasers related to Penland. As previously disclosed, based on management’s assessment of probable incurred losses associated with the Penland loan portfolio, the Corporation recorded an additional $7.8 million provision for loan losses during the second quarter of 2007. As of June 30, 2007, no loans in the Penland loan portfolio had reached a 90-day past-due status. However, based on management’s assessment of the individual borrowers, $5.4 million of these loans were placed on nonaccrual status as of June 30, 2007.
The average recorded investment in individually impaired loans for the three and six months ended June 30, 2007 were $8.2 million and $6.7 million, respectively. Individually impaired loans were $1.3 million and $1.8 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2006. Included in the $8.2 million and $6.7 million of average impaired loans for the three and six months ended June 30, 2007 were $2.8 million and $2.7 million of consumer and residential mortgage loans, respectively.
9. Servicing Rights
As of June 30, 2007, the Corporation serviced $197.2 million of mortgage loans for other parties. The carrying value and aggregate estimated fair value of mortgage servicing rights (“MSR”) at June 30, 2007 was $0.7 million and $2.0 million, respectively, compared to a carrying value and estimated fair value of $0.8 million and $2.1 million, respectively, at December 31, 2006.
In conjunction with the Corporation’s acquisition of GBC and its primary banking subsidiary, Gwinnett Bank, on November 1, 2006, the Corporation capitalized $1.2 million in servicing rights on Small Business Administration (“SBA”) loans originated, sold, and serviced by Gwinnett Bank. Effective March 1, 2007, Gwinnett Bank was merged with and into the Bank. The Corporation continues to finalize the valuations of certain assets, including the SBA loan servicing rights. During the three months ended March 31, 2007, the servicing rights valuation was refined, resulting in a downward adjustment of $0.2 million. Amortization expense included for the six months ended June 30, 2007, was $0.1 million. As of June 30, 2007, the Corporation serviced $38.3 million of SBA loans for other parties, and the carrying value and estimated fair value of the SBA loan servicing rights (“SSR”) was $0.8 million and $1.0 million, respectively.
Servicing rights are periodically evaluated for impairment based on their fair value. Impairment is recognized as a reduction to the carrying value of the asset. Fair value is estimated based on

17


Table of Contents

market prices for similar assets and on the discounted estimated present value of future net cash flows based on market consensus loan prepayment estimates, historical prepayment rates, interest rates, and other economic factors. For purposes of impairment evaluation, the servicing assets are stratified based on predominant risk characteristics of the underlying loans, including loan type (conventional or government) and note rate.
The following is an analysis of capitalized servicing rights included in other assets in the consolidated balance sheets:
                                 
 
    2007   2006
(In thousands)   MSR   SSR   MSR   SSR
 
Beginning Balance
  $ 756     $ 1,137     $ 1,133     $  
Servicing rights capitalized
          13              
Purchase accounting adjustment
          (238 )            
Amortization expense
    (41 )     (40 )     (101 )      
 
Balance, March 31
  $ 715     $ 872     $ 1,032     $  
Servicing rights capitalized
          8              
Amortization expense
    (41 )     (51 )     (100 )      
 
Balance, June 30
  $ 674     $ 829     $ 932     $  
 
Assumptions used to value the MSR included an average conditional prepayment rate (“CPR”) of 15.2 percent, an average discount rate of 12.2 percent, and a weighted-average life of 3.6 years. An increase in the prepayment rates of 10 percent and 20 percent may result in a decline in fair value of $79,000 and $153,000, respectively. An increase in the discount rate of 10 percent and 20 percent may result in a decline in fair value of $53,000 and $103,000, respectively. Changes in fair value based on a 10 percent variation in assumptions generally cannot be extrapolated because the relationship of the change in the assumption to the change in fair value may not be linear. Also, the effect of a variation in a particular assumption on the fair value of the mortgage servicing rights is calculated independently without changing any other assumption. In reality, changes in one factor may result in changes in another (for example, changes in mortgage interest rates, which drive changes in prepayment rate estimates, could result in changes in the discount rates), which may magnify or counteract the sensitivities.
Assumptions used to value the SSR included a CPR of 12.0 percent, a discount rate of 11.0 percent, and a weighted-average life of 4.7 years. An increase in the prepayment rates of 10 percent and 20 percent may result in a decline in fair value of $44,000 and $85,000, respectively. An increase in the discount rate of 10 percent and 20 percent may result in a decline in fair value of $28,000 and $54,000, respectively.
The MSR and SSR are expected to be amortized against other noninterest income over a weighted-average period of 3.1 years and 3.0 years, respectively. Expected future amortization expense for these capitalized servicing rights follows:
                         
 
(In thousands)   MSR   SSR   Total
 
July 1 - December 31, 2007
  $ 83     $ 97     $ 180  
2008
    135       170       305  
2009
    111       141       252  
2010
    92       116       208  
2011
    74       95       169  
2012 and after
    179       210       389  
 
Total amortization
  $ 674     $ 829     $ 1,503  
 
For the three and six months ended June 30, 2007, contractual servicing fee revenue was $0.3 million and $0.7 million, respectively, and was included in the mortgage services line item of other noninterest income. Contractual servicing fee revenue recognized for the three and six months ended June 30, 2006 was $0.3 million and $0.5 million, respectively, and was included in other noninterest income.

18


Table of Contents

10. Stock-Based Compensation
First Charter Comprehensive Stock Option Plan. In April 1992, the Corporation’s shareholders approved the First Charter Corporation Comprehensive Stock Option Plan (“Comprehensive Stock Option Plan”). Under the terms of the Comprehensive Stock Option Plan, stock options (which can be incentive stock options or non-qualified stock options) may be periodically granted to key employees of the Corporation or its subsidiaries. The terms and vesting schedules of options granted under the Comprehensive Stock Option Plan generally are determined by the Compensation Committee of the Corporation’s Board of Directors (“Compensation Committee”). However, no options may be exercisable prior to six months following the grant date, and certain additional restrictions, including the term and exercise price, apply with respect to any incentive stock options. Under the Comprehensive Stock Option Plan, 480,000 shares of common stock are reserved for issuance. During the three and six months ended June 30, 2007, no shares were issued under this plan.
First Charter Corporation Stock Option Plan for Non-Employee Directors. In April 1997, the Corporation’s shareholders approved the First Charter Corporation Stock Option Plan for Non-Employee Directors (“Director Plan”). Under the Director Plan, non-statutory stock options may be granted to non-employee Directors of the Corporation and its subsidiaries. The terms and vesting schedules of any options granted under the Director Plan generally are determined by the Compensation Committee. The exercise price for each option granted, however, is the fair value of the common stock as of the date of grant. A maximum of 180,000 shares are reserved for issuance under the Director Plan. During the three and six months ended June 30, 2007, no shares were issued under this plan.
2000 Omnibus Stock Option and Award Plan. In June 2000, the Corporation’s shareholders approved the First Charter Corporation 2000 Omnibus Stock Option and Award Plan (the “2000 Omnibus Plan”). Under the 2000 Omnibus Plan, 2.0 million shares of common stock were originally reserved for issuance. In April of 2005, the shareholders approved an amendment to the 2000 Omnibus Plan, authorizing an additional 1.5 million shares for issuance, for a total of 3.5 million shares. The 2000 Omnibus Plan permits the granting of stock options and nonvested shares to Directors and key employees. Stock options are granted with an exercise price equal to the market price of the Corporation’s common stock at the date of grant; those stock option awards generally vest ratably over five years and have a 10-year contractual term. Nonvested shares are generally granted at a value equal to the market price of the Corporation’s common stock at the date of grant and vesting is based on either service or performance conditions. Service-based nonvested shares generally vest over three years. Performance-based nonvested shares are earned over three years upon meeting various performance goals as approved by the Compensation Committee, including cash return on equity, targeted charge-off levels, and earnings per share growth as measured against a group of selected peer companies. During the three months ended June 30, 2007, no shares were issued under this plan. During the six months ended June 30, 2007, 71,500 stock options, 21,000 service-based nonvested shares, and 54,600 performance-based nonvested shares were issued under this plan.
Restricted Stock Award Program. In April 1995, the Corporation’s shareholders approved the First Charter Corporation Restricted Stock Award Program (the “Restricted Stock Plan”). Awards of restricted stock (nonvested shares) may be made under the Restricted Stock Plan at the discretion of the Compensation Committee to key employees. Nonvested shares are granted at a value equal to the market price of the Corporation’s common stock at the date of grant and generally vest based on either three or five years of service. Under the Restricted Stock Plan, a maximum of 360,000 shares of common stock are reserved for issuance. During the three and six months ended June 30, 2007, there were 18,732 and 89,935 service-based nonvested shares issued under this plan, respectively.

19


Table of Contents

Stock-based compensation costs totaled $1.0 million for the three months ended June 30, 2007, which consisted of $32,000 related to stock options, $736,000 related to service-based nonvested shares, and $232,000 related to performance-based nonvested shares. For the six months ended June 30, 2007, stock-based compensation costs totaled $1.8 million, which consisted of $82,000 related to stock options, $1.3 million related to service-based nonvested shares, and $446,000 related to performance-based nonvested shares.
Stock-based compensation costs totaled $555,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2006, which consisted of $202,000 related to stock options, $246,000 related to service-based nonvested shares, and $107,000 related to performance-based nonvested shares. For the six months ended June 30, 2006, stock-based compensation costs totaled $1.1 million, which consisted of $481,000 related to stock options, $373,000 related to service-based nonvested shares, and $214,000 related to performance-based nonvested shares.
The fair value of each stock option award is estimated at the date of grant using a Black-Scholes option-pricing model based on the following weighted-average assumptions:
                                 
 
    Three Months Ended   Six Months Ended
    June 30   June 30
    2007   2006   2007   2006
 
Expected volatility
    N/A       N/A       22.4 %     25.0 %
Expected dividend yield
    N/A       N/A       3.2       3.2  
Risk-free interest rate
    N/A       N/A       4.8       3.9  
Expected term (in years)
    N/A       N/A       8.0       7.0  
 
The Black-Scholes model incorporates assumptions to value stock-based awards. The risk-free rate of interest for periods within the contractual life of the option is based on a U.S. government instrument over the contractual term of the equity instrument. Expected volatility is based on historical volatility of the Corporation’s stock.
Stock option activity under the Comprehensive Stock Option Plan, the Director Plan, and the 2000 Omnibus Plan at and for the six months ended June 30, 2007, follows:
                                 
 
                    Weighted-    
                    Average    
            Weighted-   Remaining    
            Average   Contractual   Aggregate
            Exercise   Term   Intrinsic
    Shares   Price   (in years)   Value
 
Outstanding at January 1, 2007
    1,497,619     $ 20.57                  
Granted
    71,500       24.46                  
Exercised
    (56,960 )     18.98             $ 297,893  
Forfeited or expired
    (204,906 )     25.79                  
 
Outstanding at March 31, 2007
    1,307,253     $ 20.03       5.5     $ 3,093,754  
 
Exercisable at March 31, 2007
    1,187,673     $ 19.62       5.1     $ 3,093,754  
 
Weighted-average Black-Scholes fair value of options granted during the period
          $ 5.63                  
 
Outstanding at March 31, 2007
    1,307,253     $ 20.03                  
Granted
                           
Exercised
    (60,338 )     17.75             $ 239,159  
Forfeited or expired
    (22,878 )     22.76                  
 
Outstanding at June 30, 2007
    1,224,037     $ 20.09       5.3     $ 1,501,676  
 
Exercisable at June 30, 2007
    1,104,457     $ 19.65       5.1     $ 1,501,676  
 
Weighted-average Black-Scholes fair value of options granted during the period
          $                  
 

20


Table of Contents

No options were granted during the three months ended June 30, 2006. The weighted-average Black-Scholes fair value of options granted during the six months ended June 30, 2006, was $5.85, and the aggregate intrinsic value of options exercised was $604,000 and $1.5 million, respectively.
Nonvested share activity under the Omnibus Plan and the Restricted Stock Plan at and for the six months ended June 30, 2007 follows:
                                 
 
    Service-Based   Performance-Based
            Weighted-           Weighted-
            Average           Average
            Grant Date           Grant Date
    Shares   Fair Value   Shares   Fair Value
 
Outstanding at January 1, 2007
    215,663     $ 24.00       52,100     $ 21.91  
Granted
    92,203       24.34       54,600       22.70  
Vested
    (5,342 )     23.66              
Forfeited or expired
    (13,262 )     23.81              
 
Outstanding at March 31, 2007
    289,262     $ 24.14       106,700     $ 22.31  
Granted
    18,732       20.64              
Vested
                (5,967 )     22.13  
Forfeited or expired
    (4,666 )     23.88       (9,333 )     22.41  
 
Outstanding at June 30, 2007
    303,328     $ 23.92       91,400     $ 22.32  
 
As of June 30, 2007, there was approximately $5.6 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to service-based nonvested share-based compensation arrangements granted under the Omnibus Plan and the Restricted Stock Plan. This cost is expected to be recognized over a remaining weighted-average period of 2.3 years. No share-based awards vested during the three months ended June 30, 2007. The total fair value of share-based awards that vested during the six months ended June 30, 2007, was $126,000.
As of June 30, 2007, there was $1.3 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to performance-based nonvested share-based compensation arrangements granted under the Omnibus Plan. This cost is expected to be recognized over a remaining weighted-average period of 1.9 years.
The following table provides certain information about stock options outstanding at June 30, 2007:
                                         
 
    Outstanding Options   Options Exercisable
            Weighted-Average                
          Remaining   Weighted-           Weighted-
  Number   Contractual   Average   Number   Average
Range of Exercise Prices   Outstanding   Life (in years)   Exercise Price   Exercisable   Exercise Price
 
$5.01-10.00
    3,400       2.2     $ 9.04       3,400     $ 9.04  
10.01 - 12.50
    18,702       1.5       11.63       18,702       11.63  
12.51 - 15.00
    63,160       2.5       14.43       63,160       14.43  
15.01 - 17.50
    256,537       4.0       16.62       256,537       16.62  
17.51 - 20.00
    262,845       4.4       18.44       262,845       18.44  
20.01 - 22.50
    167,814       6.4       20.78       167,814       20.78  
22.51 - 25.00
    422,514       7.1       23.83       302,934       23.71  
25.01 - 27.50
    29,065       2.7       26.35       29,065       26.35  
 
Total
    1,224,037       5.3     $ 20.09       1,104,457     $ 19.65  
 

21


Table of Contents

11. Other Borrowings
A summary of other borrowings follows:
                                 
 
    June 30, 2007   December 31, 2006
            Weighted-           Weighted-
            Average           Average
            Contractual           Contractual
(In thousands)   Balance   Rate   Balance   Rate
 
Federal funds purchased and securities sold under agreements to repurchase
  $ 216,152       4.71 %   $ 201,713       4.60 %
Commercial paper
    77,844       2.71       38,191       2.72  
Other short-term borrowings
    265,000       5.30       371,000       5.35  
Long-term debt
    617,762       5.13       487,794       4.79  
 
Total other borrowings
  $ 1,176,758       4.93 %   $ 1,098,698       4.87 %
 
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase represent short-term borrowings by the banking subsidiaries with maturities less than one year collateralized by a portion of the Corporation’s securities of the United States government or its agencies, which have been delivered to a third-party custodian for safekeeping. Securities with an aggregate carrying value of $194.2 million and $214.9 million at June 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006, respectively, were pledged to secure securities sold under agreements to repurchase.
Federal funds purchased represent unsecured overnight borrowings from other financial institutions by the banking subsidiaries. At June 30, 2007, the Bank had federal funds back-up lines of credit totaling $363.0 million with $88.0 million outstanding. At December 31, 2006, the Bank had federal funds backup lines of credit totaling $188.2 million with $41.5 million outstanding.
The Corporation issues commercial paper as another source of short-term funding. It is purchased primarily by the Bank’s commercial clients. Commercial paper outstanding at June 30, 2007 was $77.8 million, compared to $38.2 million at December 31, 2006.
Other short-term borrowings consist of the FHLB borrowings with an original maturity of one year or less. FHLB borrowings are collateralized by securities from the Corporation’s investment portfolio, and a blanket lien on certain qualifying commercial and single-family loans held in the Corporation’s loan portfolio. At June 30, 2007, the Bank had $265.0 million of short-term FHLB borrowings, compared to $371.0 million at December 31, 2006.
Long-term borrowings represent FHLB borrowings with original maturities greater than one year and subordinated debentures related to trust preferred securities. At June 30, 2007, the Bank had $555.9 million of long-term FHLB borrowings, compared to $425.9 million at December 31, 2006. In addition, the Corporation had $61.9 million of outstanding subordinated debentures at June 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006.
The Corporation formed First Charter Capital Trust I and First Charter Capital Trust II, in June 2005 and September 2005, respectively; both are wholly-owned business trusts. First Charter Capital Trust I and First Charter Capital Trust II issued $35.0 million and $25.0 million, respectively, of trust preferred securities that were sold to third parties. The proceeds of the sale of the trust preferred securities were used to purchase the subordinated debentures (the “Notes”) discussed above from the Corporation, which are presented as long-term borrowings in the consolidated balance sheet and qualify for inclusion in Tier 1 capital for regulatory capital purposes, subject to certain limitations.

22


Table of Contents

The following table is a summary of the Corporation’s outstanding trust preferred securities and Notes as of June 30, 2007.
                                     
(Dollars in thousands) 
        Aggregate                    
        Principal                    
        Amount of   Aggregate                
        Trust   Principal   Stated   Per Annum   Interest    
        Preferred   Amount of   Maturity of   Interest Rate   Payment   Redemption
Issuer   Issuance Date   Securities   the Notes   the Notes   of the Notes   Dates   Period
 
Capital Trust I
  June 2005   $ 35,000     $ 36,083     September 2035   3 mo. LIBOR +
169 bps
  3/15, 6/15,
9/15, 12/15
  On or after
9/15/2010
Capital Trust II
  September 2005     25,000       25,774     December 2035   3 mo. LIBOR +
142 bps
  3/15, 6/15,
9/15, 12/15
  On or after
12/15/2010
 
Total
      $ 60,000     $ 61,857                  
 
12. Commitments, Contingencies, and Off-Balance-Sheet Risk
Commitments and Off-Balance-Sheet Risk. The Corporation is party to various financial instruments with off-balance-sheet risk in the normal course of business to meet the financing needs of its customers. These financial instruments include commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit and involve, to varying degrees, elements of credit and interest rate risk in excess of the amounts recognized in the consolidated financial statements. Commitments to extend credit are agreements to lend to a customer so long as there is no violation of any condition established in the contract. Commitments generally have fixed expiration dates and may require collateral from the borrower if deemed necessary by the Corporation. Included in loan commitments are commitments to cover customer deposit account overdrafts should they occur. Standby letters of credit are conditional commitments issued by the Corporation to guarantee the performance of a customer to a third party up to a stipulated amount and with specified terms and conditions. Standby letters of credit are recorded as a liability by the Corporation at the fair value of the obligation undertaken in issuing the guarantee. The fair value and carrying value at June 30, 2007, of standby letters of credit issued or modified during the three and six months ended June 30, 2007 was immaterial. Commitments to extend credit are not recorded as an asset or liability by the Corporation until the instrument is exercised. The Corporation uses the same credit policies in making commitments and conditional obligations as it does for instruments reflected in the consolidated financial statements. The creditworthiness of each customer is evaluated on a case-by-case basis.
The Corporation’s maximum exposure is as follows:
                                                 
 
    Less than                           Timing not    
(In thousands)   1 year   1-3 Years   4-5 Years   Over 5 Years   determinable   Total
 
Loan commitments
  $ 703,813     $ 118,172     $ 42,662     $ 59,637     $     $ 924,284  
Lines of credit
    31,390       1,639       2,921       455,613             491,563  
Standby letters of credit
    22,920       3,548                         26,468  
Anticipated tax settlements
    584                         10,551       11,135  
 
Total commitments
  $ 758,707     $ 123,359     $ 45,583     $ 515,250     $ 10,551     $ 1,453,450  
 
Contingencies. The Corporation is under examination by the North Carolina Department of Revenue for tax years 1999 through 2004 and is subject to examination for subsequent tax years. Additional information regarding the examination is included in Note 2.
The Corporation and the Bank are defendants in certain claims and legal actions arising in the ordinary course of business. In the opinion of management, after consultation with legal counsel, the ultimate disposition of these matters is not expected to have a material adverse effect on the consolidated operations, liquidity, or financial position of the Corporation or the Bank.

23


Table of Contents

13. Regulatory Restrictions and Capital Ratios
The Corporation and the Bank are subject to various regulatory capital requirements administered by bank regulatory agencies. Failure to meet minimum capital requirements can initiate certain mandatory and possibly additional discretionary actions by regulators that, if undertaken, could have a direct material effect on the Corporation’s financial position and operations. Under capital adequacy guidelines and the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action, the Corporation and the Bank must meet specific capital guidelines that involve quantitative measures of assets, liabilities, and certain off-balance-sheet items as calculated under regulatory accounting practices. The capital amounts and classifications are also subject to qualitative judgments by the regulators about components, risk weightings, and other factors.
Quantitative measures established by regulation to ensure capital adequacy require the Corporation and the Bank to maintain minimum amounts and ratios (set forth in the table below) of Total and Tier I capital (as defined in the regulations) to risk-weighted assets (as defined), and of Tier I capital (as defined) to adjusted average assets (as defined). Management believes, as of June 30, 2007, that the Corporation and the Bank meet all capital adequacy requirements to which they are subject.
The Corporation’s and the Bank’s various regulators have issued regulatory capital requirements for U.S. banking organizations. Failure to meet the capital requirements can initiate certain mandatory and discretionary actions by regulators that could have a material effect on the Corporation’s financial statements. At June 30, 2007, the Corporation and the Bank were classified as “well capitalized” under these regulatory frameworks. In the judgment of management, there have been no events or conditions since June 30, 2007, which would change the “well capitalized” status of the Corporation or the Bank.
The Corporation’s and the Bank’s actual capital amounts and ratios follow:
                                                 
 
                    For Capital    
                    Adequacy Purposes   To Be Well Capitalized
    Actual                   Minimum           Minimum
(Dollars in thousands)   Amount   Ratio   Amount   Ratio   Amount   Ratio
 
At June 30, 2007:
                                               
Leverage
                                       
First Charter Corporation
  $ 430,373       8.97 %   $ 192,023       4.00 %   None   None
First Charter Bank
    411,177       8.57       191,914       4.00     $ 239,893       5.00 %
 
                                               
Tier I Capital
                                               
First Charter Corporation
  $ 430,373       10.57 %   $ 162,932       4.00 %   None   None
First Charter Bank
    411,177       10.10       162,782       4.00     $ 244,174       6.00 %
 
                                               
Total Risk-Based Capital
                                               
First Charter Corporation
  $ 475,358       11.67 %   $ 325,863       8.00 %   None   None
First Charter Bank
    455,967       11.20       325,565       8.00     $ 406,956       10.00 %
 
                                               
At December 31, 2006:
                                               
Leverage
                                               
First Charter Corporation
  $ 428,135       9.32 %   $ 183,678       4.00 %   None   None
First Charter Bank
    362,970       8.36       173,591       4.00     $ 216,988       5.00 %
 
                                               
Tier I Capital
                                               
First Charter Corporation
  $ 428,135       10.53 %   $ 162,614       4.00 %   None   None
First Charter Bank
    362,970       9.99       145,275       4.00     $ 217,913       6.00 %
 
                                               
Total Risk-Based Capital
                                               
First Charter Corporation
  $ 463,273       11.40 %   $ 325,228       8.00 %   None   None
First Charter Bank
    393,664       10.84       290,550       8.00     $ 363,188       10.00 %
 

24


Table of Contents

Tier 1 capital consists of total equity plus qualifying capital securities and minority interests, less unrealized gains and losses accumulated in other comprehensive income, certain intangible assets, and adjustments related to the valuation of servicing assets and certain equity investments in nonfinancial companies (equity method investments).
The leverage ratio reflects Tier 1 capital divided by average total assets for the period. Average assets used in the calculation exclude certain intangible and servicing assets.
Total risk-based capital is comprised of Tier 1 capital plus qualifying subordinated debt and allowance for loan losses and a portion of unrealized gains on certain equity securities.
Both the Tier 1 and the total risk-based capital ratios are computed by dividing the respective capital amounts by risk-weighted assets, as defined.
The Corporation from time to time is required to maintain noninterest bearing reserve balances with the Federal Reserve Bank. The required reserve was $1.0 million at June 30, 2007.
Under current Federal Reserve regulations, a bank subsidiary is limited in the amount it may loan to its parent company and nonbank subsidiaries. Loans to a single affiliate may not exceed 10 percent and loans to all affiliates may not exceed 20 percent of the Bank’s capital stock, surplus, and undivided profits, plus the allowance for loan losses. Loans from the Bank to nonbank affiliates, including the parent company, are also required to be collateralized.
The primary source of funds available to the Corporation is the payment of dividends from the Bank. Dividends paid by a subsidiary bank to its parent company are also subject to certain legal and regulatory limitations.
14. Subsequent Event
On July 31, 2007, the General Assembly of North Carolina passed House Bill 1473 which includes a provision that disallows the deduction of dividends paid by captive real estate investment trusts (“REITs”) for the purposes of determining North Carolina taxable income. The Corporation, through its subsidiaries, participates in two entities classified as captive REITs from which the Corporation has historically received dividends which resulted in certain tax benefits taken within the Corporation’s tax returns and consolidated financial statements. This legislation is effective for taxable years beginning on or after January 1, 2007.
The Corporation is currently evaluating the impact that this legislation will have on the Corporation’s current and prior tax filings, as well as the related financial statement impact to the Corporation’s effective tax rate and uncertain tax positions. Assuming the legislation eliminates the deductibility of the REIT dividends for North Carolina state income tax purposes, the Corporation expects an increase in its effective tax rate for 2007 and subsequent fiscal years.
15. Business Segment Information
The Corporation operates one reportable segment, the Bank, the Corporation’s primary banking subsidiary. The Bank provides businesses and individuals with commercial, consumer and mortgage loans, deposit banking services, brokerage services, insurance products, and comprehensive financial planning solutions. The results of the Bank’s operations constitute a substantial majority of the consolidated net income, revenue and assets of the Corporation. Intercompany transactions and the Corporation’s revenue, expenses, assets (including cash, investment securities, and investments in venture capital limited partnerships) and liabilities (including commercial paper and subordinated debentures) are included in the “Other” category.

25


Table of Contents

Information regarding the separate results of operations and assets for the Bank and Other for the three months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006 follows:
                                 
 
    Three Months Ended
    June 30, 2007
                            Consolidated
(In thousands)   The Bank   Other   Eliminations   Total
 
Interest income
  $ 78,280     $ 11     $     $ 78,291  
Interest expense
    39,520       1,227             40,747  
 
Net interest income (expense)
    38,760       (1,216 )           37,544  
Provision for loan losses
    9,124                   9,124  
Noninterest income
    20,109       32             20,141  
Noninterest expense
    34,951       256             35,207  
 
Income (loss) from continuing operations before
    14,794       (1,440 )           13,354  
income tax expense
                               
Income tax expense (benefit)
    4,886       (482 )           4,404  
 
Net income (loss)
  $ 9,908     $ (958 )   $     $ 8,950  
 
Average loans
  $ 3,543,840     $     $     $ 3,543,840  
Average assets
    4,861,455       537,631       (524,344 )     4,874,742  
Total assets
    4,898,290       589,514       (571,083 )     4,916,721  
 
                                 
 
    Three Months Ended
    June 30, 2006
                            Consolidated
(In thousands)   The Bank   Other   Eliminations   Total
 
Interest income
  $ 63,653     $ 89     $     $ 63,742  
Interest expense
    29,935       1,160             31,095  
 
Net interest income (expense)
    33,718       (1,071 )           32,647  
Provision for loan losses
    880                   880  
Noninterest income (loss)
    16,301       (9 )           16,292  
Noninterest expense
    30,649       39             30,688  
 
Income (loss) from continuing operations before
    18,490       (1,119 )           17,371  
income tax expense
                               
Income tax expense (benefit)
    6,329       (383 )           5,946  
 
Income (loss) from continuing operations, net of tax
    12,161       (736 )           11,425  
Discontinued operations:
                               
Income from discontinued operations
    50                   50  
Income tax expense
    20                   20  
 
Income from discontinued operations, net of tax
    30                   30  
 
Net income (loss)
  $ 12,191     $ (736 )   $     $ 11,455  
 
Average loans
  $ 3,030,815     $     $     $ 3,030,815  
Average assets of continuing operations
    4,251,761       417,805       (397,703 )     4,271,863  
Average assets of discontinued operations
    2,482                   2,482  
Total assets of continuing operations
    4,332,140       443,647       (417,139 )     4,358,648  
Total assets of discontinued operations
    2,583                   2,583  
 

26


Table of Contents

Information regarding the separate results of operations and assets for the Bank and Other for the six months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006 follows:
                                 
 
    Six Months Ended
    June 30, 2007
                            Consolidated
(In thousands)   The Bank   Other   Eliminations   Total
 
Interest income
  $ 155,412     $ 93     $     $ 155,505  
Interest expense
    78,742       2,484             81,226  
 
Net interest income (expense)
    76,670       (2,391 )           74,279  
Provision for loan losses
    10,490                   10,490  
Noninterest income
    39,567       140             39,707  
Noninterest expense
    70,661       466             71,127  
 
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income tax expense
    35,086       (2,717 )           32,369  
Income tax expense (benefit)
    11,992       (929 )           11,063  
 
Net income (loss)
  $ 23,094     $ (1,788 )   $     $ 21,306  
 
Average loans
  $ 3,532,915     $     $     $ 3,532,915  
Average assets
    4,858,766       539,157       (525,001 )     4,872,922  
Total assets
    4,898,290       589,514       (571,083 )     4,916,721  
 
                                 
 
    Six Months Ended
    June 30, 2006
                            Consolidated
(In thousands)   The Bank   Other   Eliminations   Total
 
Interest income
  $ 123,281     $ 107     $     $ 123,388  
Interest expense
    56,411       2,240             58,651  
 
Net interest income (expense)
    66,870       (2,133 )           64,737  
Provision for loan losses
    2,399                   2,399  
Noninterest income
    33,204       79             33,283  
Noninterest expense
    61,327       102             61,429  
 
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income tax expense
    36,348       (2,156 )           34,192  
Income tax expense (benefit)
    12,348       (734 )           11,614  
 
Income (loss) from continuing operations, net of tax
    24,000       (1,422 )           22,578  
Discontinued operations:
                               
Income from discontinued operations
    198                   198  
Income tax expense
    78                   78  
 
Income from discontinued operations, net of tax
    120                   120  
 
Net income (loss)
  $ 24,120     $ (1,422 )   $     $ 22,698  
 
Average loans
  $ 2,988,596     $     $     $ 2,988,596  
Average assets of continuing operations
    4,217,951       417,950       (400,284 )     4,235,617  
Average assets of discontinued operations
    2,511                   2,511  
Total assets of continuing operations
    4,332,140       443,647       (417,139 )     4,358,648  
Total assets of discontinued operations
    2,583                   2,583  
 

27


Table of Contents

Item 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Factors that May Affect Future Results
 
The following discussion contains certain forward-looking statements about the Corporation’s financial condition and results of operations, which are subject to certain risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those reflected in the forward-looking statements. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which reflect management’s judgment only as of the date hereof. The Corporation undertakes no obligation to publicly revise these forward-looking statements to reflect events and circumstances that arise after the date hereof.
Factors that may cause actual results to differ materially from those contemplated by such forward- looking statements, and which may be beyond the Corporation’s control, include, among others, the following possibilities: (i) projected results in connection with management’s implementation of, or changes in, the Corporation’s business plan and strategic initiatives, including the Corporation’s various balance sheet initiatives; (ii) competitive pressure among financial services companies increases significantly; (iii) costs or difficulties related to the integration of acquisitions, including deposit attrition, customer retention and revenue loss, or expenses in general are greater than expected; (iv) general economic conditions, in the markets in which the Corporation does business, are less favorable than expected; (v) risks inherent in making loans, including repayment risks and risks associated with collateral values, are greater than expected, including the Penland loans described herein; (vi) changes in the interest rate environment, or interest rate policies of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, may reduce interest margins and affect funding sources; (vii) changes in market rates and prices may adversely affect the value of financial products; (viii) legislation or regulatory requirements or changes thereto, including changes in accounting standards, may adversely affect the businesses in which the Corporation is engaged; (ix) regulatory compliance cost increases are greater than expected; (x) the passage of future tax legislation, or any negative regulatory, administrative or judicial position, may adversely impact the Corporation; (xi) the Corporation’s competitors may have greater financial resources and may develop products that enable them to compete more successfully in the markets in which the Corporation operates; (xii) changes in the securities markets, including changes in interest rates, may adversely affect the Corporation’s ability to raise capital from time to time; (xiii) the material weaknesses in the Corporation’s internal control over financial reporting result in subsequent adjustments to management’s projected results; and (xiv) implementation of management’s plans to remediate the material weaknesses takes longer than expected and causes the Corporation to incur costs that are greater than expected.
Overview
 
First Charter Corporation (NASDAQ: FCTR) (hereinafter referred to as “First Charter,” the “Corporation,” or the “Registrant”), headquartered in Charlotte, North Carolina, is a regional financial services company with assets of $4.9 billion and is the holding company for First Charter Bank (the “Bank”). As of June 30, 2007, First Charter operated 58 financial centers, four insurance offices, and 138 ATMs throughout North Carolina and Georgia, and also operates loan origination offices in Asheville, North Carolina and Reston, Virginia. First Charter provides businesses and individuals with a broad range of financial services, including banking, financial planning, wealth management, investments, insurance, and mortgages. The results of operations of the Bank constitute the substantial majority of the consolidated net income, revenue, and assets of the Corporation.
The Corporation’s principal source of earnings is derived from net interest income. Net interest income is the interest earned on securities, loans, and other interest-earning assets less the interest paid for deposits and short- and long-term debt.

28


Table of Contents

Another source of earnings for the Corporation is noninterest income. Noninterest income is derived largely from service charges on deposit accounts and other fee or commission-based services and products, including mortgage, wealth management, brokerage, and insurance. Other sources of noninterest income include securities gains or losses, gains from Small Business Administration loan sales, transactions involving bank-owned property, and income from Bank Owned Life Insurance (“BOLI”) policies.
Noninterest expense is the primary component of expense for the Corporation. Noninterest expense is primarily composed of corporate operating expenses, including salaries and benefits, occupancy and equipment, professional fees, and other operating expense. The provision for loan losses and income taxes are also considered material expenses.
The Community-Banking Model
The Bank follows a community-banking model. The community-banking model is focused on delivering a broad array of financial products and solutions to our clients with exceptional service and convenience at a fair price. It emphasizes local market decision-making and management whenever possible. Management believes this model works well against larger competitors that may have less flexibility, as well as local competition that may not have the array of products and services that the Bank offers. The Bank competes against four of the largest banks in the country, as well as other local banks, savings and loan associations, credit unions, and finance companies. Management believes that by focusing on core values, striving to exceed our clients’ expectations, being an employer of choice and providing exceptional value to shareholders, the Corporation can achieve the profitability and growth goals it has set for itself.
Market Expansion
First Charter expanded into the Raleigh, North Carolina market with the opening of a de novo financial center in October 2005 and three additional de novo financial centers in mid-February, 2006. A fifth de novo financial center opened in Raleigh in late-January 2007.
On November 1, 2006, the Corporation entered the greater Atlanta, Georgia metropolitan market with the acquisition of GBC Bancorp, Inc. (“GBC”) and its banking subsidiary, Gwinnett Banking Company (“Gwinnett Bank”), with financial centers located in Lawrenceville and Alpharetta, Georgia. By expanding into the greater Atlanta metropolitan market through this acquisition, the Corporation has been able to spread its credit risk over multiple market areas and states, as well as gain access to another large market area as a source of core deposits. Effective March 1, 2007, Gwinnett Bank was merged with and into the Bank.
Recent Challenges
During the fourth quarter of 2006, the Corporation closed two significant transactions, the acquisition of GBC and the sale of Southeastern Employee Benefits Services (“SEBS”), its employee benefits administration business. In addition, the Corporation was faced with several new accounting standards. The numerous challenges that these events posed for the Corporation were compounded by a key vacancy in the leadership of its accounting area and turnover within other key finance positions, and exposed certain material weaknesses in the Corporation’s internal control over financial reporting. Management has begun to implement its remediation plan to address these material weaknesses (the “Remediation Plan”). See Item 4. Controls and Procedures.
For additional information with respect to the material weaknesses in the Corporation’s internal controls, and the Remediation Plan, refer to First Charter’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006.

29


Table of Contents

During the second quarter of 2007, the North Carolina Attorney General obtained a court order to appoint a receiver to take control of a real estate venture in Western North Carolina. The Attorney General’s complaint alleges that various defendants, including real estate development companies, individuals, and an appraiser engaged in deceptive practices to induce consumers to obtain loans to purchase lots in The Village of Penland and related development projects (“Penland”) in the Spruce Pine, North Carolina area. These lots were allegedly priced based upon inflated appraisals. Several financial institutions, including First Charter, made loans in connection with these residential developments.
As of June 30, 2007, the Corporation had 70 loans with an aggregate outstanding balance of $14.1 million to individual lot purchasers related to Penland. As previously disclosed, based on management’s assessment of probable incurred losses associated with the Penland loan portfolio, the Corporation recorded an additional $7.8 million provision for loan losses during the second quarter of 2007. As of June 30, 2007, no loans in the Penland loan portfolio had reached a 90-day past-due status. However, based on management’s assessment of the individual borrowers, $5.4 million of these loans were placed on nonaccrual status as of June 30, 2007 and all of the previously recognized interest income related to these nonaccrual loans was reversed.
Financial Summary
The Corporation’s second quarter 2007 net income was $9.0 million, a 21.9 percent decrease, compared to $11.5 million for the second quarter of 2006. On a per share basis, net income was $0.26 per diluted share, compared to $0.37 per diluted share for the second quarter of 2006.
Total revenue on a tax-equivalent basis increased 17.8 percent to $58.3 million, compared to $49.5 million in the second quarter of 2006. Return on average tangible equity was 9.97 percent and return on average assets was 0.74 percent, compared to 14.97 percent and 1.07 percent, respectively, a year ago.
The financial results for 2007 include the financial performance and the effect of additional outstanding shares from the recent acquisition of GBC Bancorp, Inc., compared with two months of results in the 2006 fourth quarter and no impact for the six months ended June 30, 2006.
For the six months ended June 30, 2007 net income was $21.3 million, a 6.1 percent decrease, compared to $22.7 million from the same period a year ago. On a per share basis, net income was $0.61 per diluted share for the six months ended June 30, 2007, compared to $0.73 per diluted share for the six months ended June 30, 2006.

30


Table of Contents

Table One
Selected Financial Data by Quarter
 
                                         
    Three Months Ended
    June 30   March 31   December 31   September 30   June 30
(Dollars in thousands, except share and per share amounts)   2007   2007   2006   2006   2006
 
Income statement
                                       
Interest income
  $ 78,291     $ 77,214     $ 74,456     $ 67,085     $ 63,742  
Interest expense
    40,747       40,479       38,441       34,127       31,095  
 
Net interest income
    37,544       36,735       36,015       32,958       32,647  
Provision for loan losses
    9,124       1,366       1,486       1,405       880  
Noninterest income
    20,141       19,566       17,388       17,007       16,292  
Noninterest expense
    35,207       35,920       33,853       29,655       30,688  
 
Income from continuing operations before income tax expense
    13,354       19,015       18,064       18,905       17,371  
Income tax expense
    4,404       6,659       5,962       6,223       5,946  
 
Income from continuing operations, net of tax
    8,950       12,356       12,102       12,682       11,425  
Discontinued operations:
                                       
Income (loss) from discontinued operations
                (162 )           50  
Gain on sale
                962              
Income tax expense
                887             20  
 
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax
                (87 )           30  
 
Net income
  $ 8,950     $ 12,356     $ 12,015     $ 12,682     $ 11,455  
 
Per common share
                                       
Basic earnings per share
                                       
Income from continuing operations, net of tax
  $ 0.26     $ 0.36     $ 0.36     $ 0.41     $ 0.37  
Net income
    0.26       0.36       0.36       0.41       0.37  
Diluted earnings per share
                                       
Income from continuing operations, net of tax
    0.26       0.35       0.36       0.40       0.37  
Net income
    0.26       0.35       0.36       0.40       0.37  
Average shares
                                       
Basic
    34,697,944       34,770,106       33,268,542       31,056,059       31,058,858  
Diluted
    34,986,662       35,084,640       33,583,617       31,426,563       31,339,325  
Dividends declared
    0.195       0.195       0.195       0.195       0.195  
Period-end book value
    12.85       12.97       12.81       11.20       10.73  
 
Performance ratios
                                       
Return on average equity (1)
    7.86 %     11.09 %     11.69 %     14.76 %     13.80  
Return on average assets (1)
    0.74       1.03       1.02       1.16       1.07  
Net yield on earning assets (1)
    3.42       3.38       3.40       3.33       3.36  
Average portfolio loans to average deposits
    109.50       107.98       105.88       103.37       108.27  
Average equity to average assets
    9.37       9.28       8.75       7.86       7.79  
Efficiency ratio (2)
    60.4       63.1       62.6       52.6       62.0  
 
Selected period-end balances
                                       
Portfolio loans, net
  $ 3,509,047     $ 3,494,015     $ 3,450,087     $ 3,061,864     $ 3,042,768  
Loans held for sale
    11,471       13,691       12,292       10,923       8,382  
Allowance for loan losses
    44,790       35,854       34,966       29,919       29,520  
Securities available for sale
    898,528       897,762       906,415       899,120       884,370  
Assets
    4,916,721       4,884,495       4,856,717       4,382,507       4,361,231  
Deposits
    3,230,346       3,321,366       3,248,128       2,954,854       2,988,802  
Other borrowings
    1,176,758       1,044,229       1,098,698       1,031,798       995,707  
Total liabilities
    4,470,893       4,429,123       4,409,355       4,033,069       4,027,333  
Shareholders’ equity
    445,828       455,372       447,362       349,438       333,898  
Selected average balances
                                       
Portfolio loans
    3,532,713       3,510,437       3,336,563       3,070,286       3,021,005  
Loans held for sale
    11,127       11,431       10,757       8,792       9,810  
Securities available for sale, at cost
    914,606       926,970       924,773       923,293       921,026  
Earning assets
    4,467,031       4,463,161       4,284,735       4,013,745       3,960,835  
Assets
    4,874,742       4,871,083       4,664,431       4,336,270       4,274,345  
Deposits
    3,226,308       3,251,137       3,151,120       2,970,047       2,790,197  
Other borrowings
    1,131,599       1,113,191       1,054,550       984,504       1,108,734  
Shareholders’ equity
    456,634       451,835       407,929       340,986       332,987  
 
(1)  
Annualized.
 
(2)  
Noninterest expense divided by the sum of taxable-equivalent net interest income plus noninterest income less gain (loss) on sale of securities, net. Excludes the results of discontinued operations.

31


Table of Contents

Critical Accounting Estimates and Policies
 
The Corporation’s significant accounting policies are described in Note 1 of the Corporation’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006, on pages 69 to 76. These policies are essential in understanding management’s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations. Some of the Corporation’s accounting policies require significant judgment to estimate values of either assets or liabilities. In addition, certain accounting principles require significant judgment with respect to their application to complicated transactions to determine the most appropriate treatment.
The Corporation has identified three accounting policies as being critical in terms of judgments and the extent to which estimates are used: allowance for loan losses, income taxes, and identified intangible assets and goodwill. In many cases, there are numerous alternative judgments that could be used in the process of estimating values of assets or liabilities. Where alternatives exist, the Corporation has used the factors it believes represent the most reasonable value in developing the inputs for the valuation. Actual performance that differs from the Corporation’s estimates of the key variables could affect net income.
As previously discussed, the Corporation recorded an additional provision for loan losses related to the Penland in the second quarter 2007. The Corporation began evaluating its exposure to Penland in early June 2007 after the North Carolina Attorney General announced that he had obtained a court order to appoint a receiver to take control of the development. The Corporation continues to evaluate the Penland lot loan portfolio. Subsequent developments related to the Penland lot loans may have a significant impact on the provision for loan losses.
As described in Note 14 to the consolidated financial statements, on July 31, 2007 the General Assembly of North Carolina passed legislation which includes a provision that disallows the deduction of dividends paid by captive real estate investment trusts (“REITs”) for the purposes of determining North Carolina taxable income. The Corporation, through its subsidiaries, participates in two entities classified as captive REITs from which the Corporation has historically received dividends which resulted in certain tax benefits taken within the Corporation’s tax returns and consolidated financial statements. The Corporation is currently evaluating the impact that this legislation will have on the Corporation’s current and prior tax filings, as well as the related financial statement impact to the Corporation’s effective tax rate and uncertain tax positions.
For more information on the Corporation’s critical accounting policies, refer to pages 29 to 31 of the Corporation’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006.
Earnings Performance
 
Net Interest Income and Margin
Net interest income, the difference between total interest income and total interest expense, is the Corporation’s principal source of earnings. An analysis of the Corporation’s net interest income on a taxable-equivalent basis and average balance sheets for the three and six months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006 is presented in Table Two and Table Three. Net interest income on a taxable-equivalent basis is a non-GAAP (Generally Accepted Accounting Principles) performance measure used by management in operating the business, which management believes provides investors with a more accurate picture of the interest margin for comparative purposes. The changes in net interest income (on a taxable-equivalent basis) for the six months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006 are analyzed in Table Four and Table Five. Except as noted, the discussion below is based on net interest income computed under accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
Net interest income increased to $37.5 million, representing a $4.9 million, or 15.0 percent, increase over the second quarter of 2006. The net interest margin (taxable-equivalent net interest income divided by average earning assets) increased six basis points to 3.42 percent in the second quarter of 2007 from 3.36 percent in the second quarter of 2006. The margin benefited from continued disciplined pricing of loans and deposits and a greater concentration of higher-yielding commercial loans relative to total

32


Table of Contents

assets. Placing $5.4 million of the Penland lot loans on nonaccrual status in the second quarter of 2007 partially offset the increase in net interest income and reduced the margin by one basis point.
Compared to the second quarter of 2006, earning-asset yields increased 57 basis points to 7.08 percent. This increase was driven by several factors. First, loan yields increased 44 basis points to 7.61 percent. Second, securities yields increased 69 basis points to 5.06 percent. Third, the mix of higher-yielding (loan) assets improved as a result of the GBC acquisition and a smaller percentage of lower-yielding mortgage and consumer loans. Lastly, the percentage of investment securities average balances (which, typically, have lower yields than loans) to total earning-asset average balances, was reduced from 23.3 percent to 20.5 percent over the past year.
On the liability side of the balance sheet, the cost of interest-bearing liabilities increased 60 basis points to 4.19 percent, compared to the second quarter of 2006. This increase was comprised of a 71 basis point increase in interest-bearing deposit costs to 3.82 percent, while other borrowing costs increased 49 basis points to 5.10 percent. During 2006, the Federal Reserve raised the rate that banks lend funds to each other (the Fed Funds rate) by 100 basis points. Also, as a result of deposit growth, the percentage of higher-cost, other borrowings average balances was reduced from 31.9 percent to 29.0 percent of total interest-bearing liabilities average balances over the past year.
For the six months ended June 30, 2007, net interest income increased to $74.3 million, representing a $9.5 million, or 14.7 percent, increase from the same period in 2006. The net interest margin increased two basis points to 3.40 percent for the six months ended June 30, 2007, compared to 3.38 percent in the same 2006 period. As discussed previously, the improvements in the margin stemmed from continued disciplined pricing of loans and deposits and a greater concentration of higher-yielding commercial loans relative to total assets.
Compared to the six months ended June 30, 2006, earning-asset yields increased 67 basis points to 7.07 percent. This increase was driven by two factors. First, loan yields increased 57 basis points to 7.61 percent and securities yields increased 66 basis points to 5.00 percent. Second, as discussed above, the mix of higher-yielding (loan) assets improved as a result of the GBC acquisition and a smaller percentage of lower-yielding mortgage and consumer loans. The percentage of investment securities average balances (which, typically, have lower yields than loans) to total earning-asset average balances, was reduced from 23.4 percent to 20.6 percent over the past year.
The cost of interest-bearing liabilities increased 76 basis points, compared to the six months ended June 30, 2006. This was comprised of an 86 basis point increase in interest-bearing deposit costs to 3.83 percent, while other borrowing costs increased 65 basis points to 5.09 percent. During 2006, the Federal Reserve raised the Fed Funds rate by 100 basis points. Also, as a result of deposit growth, the percentage of higher-cost, other borrowings average balances was reduced from 31.3 percent to 28.7 percent of total interest-bearing liabilities average balances over the past year.

33


Table of Contents

Interest income and yields for earning-asset average balances, interest expense and rates paid on interest-bearing liability average balances, and the net interest margin for the three months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006 follow:
Table Two
Average Balances and Net Interest Income Analysis
 
                                                 
    Three Months Ended June 30
    2007   2006
    Daily   Interest   Average   Daily   Interest   Average
    Average   Income/   Yield/Rate   Average   Income/   Yield/Rate
(Dollars in thousands)   Balance   Expense   Paid(5)   Balance   Expense   Paid (5)
 
Assets
                                               
Earning assets
                                               
Loans and loans held for sale (1) (2) (3) (4)
  $ 3,543,825     $ 67,243       7.61 %   $ 3,030,815     $ 54,167       7.17 %
Securities — taxable (4)
    819,097       10,130       4.96       819,886       8,534       4.16  
Securities — tax-exempt
    95,509       1,428       6.00       101,140       1,520       6.01  
Federal funds sold
    3,777       48       5.31       3,011       37       4.93  
Interest-bearing bank deposits
    4,808       61       5.01       5,983       60       4.02  
 
Total earning assets
    4,467,016     $ 78,910       7.08 %   $ 3,960,835     $ 64,318       6.51 %
Cash and due from banks
    80,864                       77,115                  
Other assets
    326,862                       236,395                  
 
Total assets
  $ 4,874,742                     $ 4,274,345                  
 
Liabilities and shareholders’ equity
                                               
Interest-bearing liabilities
                                               
Demand deposits
  $ 413,534     $ 1,167       1.13 %   $ 367,146     $ 647       0.71 %
Money market accounts
    608,489       5,287       3.48       561,005       4,454       3.18  
Savings deposits
    114,656       62       0.22       121,130       65       0.22  
Certificates of deposit
    1,631,616       19,848       4.88       1,312,993       13,175       4.02  
Retail other borrowings
    94,784       774       3.58       142,645       999       2.81  
Wholesale other borrowings
    1,036,815       13,609       5.26       966,089       11,755       4.88  
 
Total interest-bearing liabilities
    3,899,894       40,747       4.19 %     3,471,008       31,095       3.59 %
Noninterest-bearing deposits
    458,013                       427,923                  
Other liabilities
    60,201                       42,427                  
Shareholders’ equity
    456,634                       332,987                  
 
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity
  $ 4,874,742                     $ 4,274,345                  
 
Net interest spread
                    2.89 %                     2.92 %
Contribution of noninterest bearing sources
                    0.53                       0.44  
 
Net interest income/ yield on earning assets
          $ 38,163       3.42 %           $ 33,223       3.36 %
 
(1)  
The preceding analysis takes into consideration the principal amount of nonaccruing loans and only income actually collected and recognized on such loans.
 
(2)  
Average loan balances are shown net of unearned income.
 
(3)  
Includes amortization of deferred loan fees of $1,031 and $701 for the three months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively.
 
(4)  
Yields on tax-exempt securities and loans are stated on a taxable-equivalent basis, assuming a Federal tax rate of 35 percent and applicable state taxes for 2007 and 2006. The adjustments made to convert to a taxable-equivalent basis were $619 and $576 for the three months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively.
 
(5)  
Annualized.

34


Table of Contents

Interest income and yields for earning-asset average balances, interest expense and rates paid on interest-bearing liability average balances, and the net interest margin for the six months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006 follow:
Table Three
Average Balances and Net Interest Income Analysis
 
                                                 
    Six Months Ended June 30
    2007   2006
    Daily   Interest   Average   Daily   Interest   Average
    Average   Income/   Yield/Rate   Average   Income/   Yield/Rate
(Dollars in thousands)   Balance   Expense   Paid (5)   Balance   Expense   Paid (5)
 
Assets
                                               
Earning assets
                                               
Loans and loans held for sale (1) (2) (3) (4)
  $ 3,532,900     $ 133,482       7.61 %   $ 2,988,596     $ 104,473       7.04 %
Securities — taxable (4)
    822,696       20,079       4.89       814,175       16,842       4.14  
Securities — tax-exempt
    98,057       2,919       5.95       103,735       3,063       5.91  
Federal funds sold
    6,410       176       5.59       3,115       73       4.70  
Interest-bearing bank deposits
    5,028       111       4.44       5,348       99       3.75  
 
Total earning assets
    4,465,091     $ 156,767       7.07 %   $ 3,914,969     $ 124,550       6.40 %
Cash and due from banks
    80,116                       87,409                  
Other assets
    327,715                       237,628                  
 
Total assets
  $ 4,872,922                     $ 4,240,006                  
 
Liabilities and shareholders’ equity
                                               
Interest-bearing liabilities
                                               
Demand deposits
  $ 406,584     $ 2,225       1.10 %   $ 361,693     $ 1,093       0.61 %
Money market accounts
    625,342       10,838       3.49       568,263       8,306       2.95  
Savings deposits
    113,826       129       0.23       120,616       130       0.22  
Certificates of deposit
    1,640,463       39,712       4.88       1,316,992       25,376       3.89  
Retail other borrowings
    93,445       1,437       3.10       135,903       1,777       2.64  
Wholesale other borrowings
    1,029,001       26,885       5.27       943,392       21,969       4.70  
 
Total interest-bearing liabilities
    3,908,661       81,226       4.19 %     3,446,859       58,651       3.43 %
Noninterest-bearing deposits
    452,438                       420,364                  
Other liabilities
    57,576                       40,392                  
Shareholders’ equity
    454,247                       332,391                  
 
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity
  $ 4,872,922                     $ 4,240,006                  
 
Net interest spread
                    2.88 %                     2.97 %
Contribution of noninterest bearing sources
                    0.52                       0.41  
 
Net interest income/ yield on earning assets
          $ 75,541       3.40 %           $ 65,899       3.38 %
 
(1)  
The preceding analysis takes into consideration the principal amount of nonaccruing loans and only income actually collected and recognized on such loans.
 
(2)  
Average loan balances are shown net of unearned income.
 
(3)  
Includes amortization of deferred loan fees of $1,859 and $1,446 for the three months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively.
 
(4)  
Yields on tax-exempt securities and loans are stated on a taxable-equivalent basis, assuming a Federal tax rate of 35 percent and applicable state taxes for 2007 and 2006. The adjustments made to convert to a taxable-equivalent basis were $1,262 and $1,162 for the six months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively.
 
(5)  
Annualized.

35


Table of Contents

The following tables show changes in tax-equivalent interest income, interest expense, and tax-equivalent net interest income arising from rate and volume changes for major categories of earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities. The change in interest not solely due to changes in volume or rate has been allocated in proportion to the absolute dollar amounts of the change in each.
Table Four
Volume and Rate Variance Analysis
 
                         
    Three Months Ended
    June 30
    2007 vs 2006
    Due to Change in   Net
(In thousands)   Volume   Rate   Change
 
Increase (decrease) in tax-equivalent interest income
                       
Loans and loans held for sale (1)
  $ 9,583     $ 3,493     $ 13,076  
Securities — taxable (1)
    (8 )     1,604       1,596  
Securities — tax-exempt
    (84 )     (8 )     (92 )
Federal funds sold
    10       3       13  
Interest-bearing bank deposits
    (13 )     13        
 
Total
  $ 9,488     $ 5,105     $ 14,593  
 
Increase (decrease) in interest expense
                       
Deposits:
                       
Demand
  $ 90     $ 430     $ 520  
Money market
    394       439       833  
Savings
    (3 )           (3 )
Certificates of deposit
    3,559       3,114       6,673  
Retail other borrowings
    (373 )     149       (224 )
Wholesale other borrowings
    893       961       1,854  
 
Total
  $ 4,560     $ 5,093     $ 9,653  
 
Increase in tax-equivalent net interest income
                  $ 4,940  
 
(1)  
Income on tax-exempt securities and loans are stated on a taxable-equivalent basis. Refer to Table Two for further details.

36


Table of Contents

Changes in net interest income for the six months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006 are as follows:
Table Five
Volume and Rate Variance Analysis
 
                         
    Six Months Ended
    June 30
    2007 vs 2006
    Due to Change in   Net
(In thousands)   Volume   Rate   Change
 
Increase (decrease) in tax-equivalent interest income
                       
Loans and loans held for sale (1)
  $ 20,093     $ 8,916     $ 29,009  
Securities — taxable (1)
    178       3,059       3,237  
Securities — tax-exempt
    (169 )     25       (144 )
Federal funds sold
    89       16       105  
Interest-bearing bank deposits
    (6 )     18       12  
 
Total
  $ 20,185     $ 12,034     $ 32,219  
 
Increase (decrease) in interest expense
                       
Deposits:
                       
Demand
  $ 150     $ 982     $ 1,132  
Money market
    889       1,643       2,532  
Savings
    (8 )     7       (1 )
Certificates of deposit
    7,015       7,322       14,337  
Retail other borrowings
    (618 )     278       (340 )
Wholesale other borrowings
    2,097       2,819       4,916  
 
Total
  $ 9,525     $ 13,051     $ 22,576  
 
Increase in tax-equivalent net interest income
                  $ 9,643  
 
(1)  
Income on tax-exempt securities and loans are stated on a taxable-equivalent basis. Refer to Table Three for further details.
Noninterest Income
The major components of noninterest income are derived from service charges on deposit accounts, ATM, debit, and merchant fees, and mortgage, brokerage, insurance, and wealth management revenue. In addition, the Corporation realizes gains (and losses) on securities, equity investments, Small Business Administration loan sales, bank-owned property sales, and income from its BOLI policies.
Historical noninterest income and expense amounts have been restated to reflect the effect of reporting the previously announced sale of Southeastern Employee Benefits Services (SEBS) in the fourth quarter of 2006 as discontinued operations and to reflect the implementation of SAB 108 at year-end 2006.

37


Table of Contents

Details of noninterest income follow for the three months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006:
Table Six
Noninterest Income
 
                                 
    Three Months Ended    
    June 30   Increase / (Decrease)
(In thousands)   2007   2006   Amount   Percent
 
Service charges on deposits
  $ 7,942     $ 7,469     $ 473       6.3 %
ATM, debit, and merchant fees
    2,636       2,117       519       24.5  
Wealth management
    944       693       251       36.2  
Equity method investment gains, net
    678       11       667       6,063.6  
Mortgage services
    1,056       812       244       30.0  
Gain on sale of Small Business Administration loans
    132             132        
Brokerage services
    1,007       692       315       45.5  
Insurance services
    3,422       2,898       524       18.1  
Bank owned life insurance
    1,162       850       312       36.7  
Property sale gains, net
    152       107       45       42.1  
Securities gains, net
          32       (32 )     (100.0 )
Other
    1,010       611       399       65.3  
 
Noninterest income from continuing operations
    20,141       16,292       3,849       23.6  
Noninterest income from discontinued operations
          844       (844 )     (100.0 )
 
Total noninterest income
  $ 20,141     $ 17,136     $ 3,005       17.5 %
 
Selected items included in noninterest income for the three months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006 follow. These items are considered non-core to the Corporation’s operations.
Table Seven
Selected Items Included in Noninterest Income
 
                 
    Three Months Ended
    June 30
(In thousands)   2007   2006
 
Securities gains, net
  $     $ 32  
Equity method investment gains , net
    678       11  
Property sale gains, net
    152       107  
Gains related to reinsurance arrangement
    288        
 
Noninterest income from continuing operations for the second quarter of 2007 was $20.1 million, an increase of $3.8 million, or 23.6 percent, from $16.3 million in the second quarter of 2006. The primary factors for this increase include the following:
   
Revenue from deposit service charges was $0.5 million higher, principally reflecting a larger number of checking accounts.
 
   
ATM, debit, and merchant card revenue was $0.5 million higher, reflecting both a larger number of accounts and transactions.
 
   
Of the total $0.3 million increase in wealth management income, $0.2 million was related to transaction fees for a single estate.
 
   
Equity method investment gains were $0.7 million higher in the 2007 second quarter. The returns on the equity method investments vary from period to period and income is recorded when earned.
 
   
Mortgage services revenue increased $0.2 million, due to a rise in originations and sales.
 
   
Although the Corporation originated SBA loans prior to the GBC acquisition, the Corporation retained these loans. Therefore, gains on SBA loan sales were $0.1 million in the 2007 second quarter, compared to no sales in the same 2006 period.

38


Table of Contents

   
Brokerage services revenue was $0.3 million higher in 2007 due to increased production from the addition of several financial consultants in the latter half of 2006.
 
   
Insurance revenues increased $0.5 million in the second quarter of 2007, compared to the second quarter of 2006 as a result of the majority of contingency income being received in the first quarter of 2006, versus a more even distribution between the first and second quarters of 2007.
 
   
The restructuring of $21.5 million of Bank Owned Life Insurance (BOLI) in mid-2006, the purchase of $10.0 million in new coverage, and the addition of $5.9 million of BOLI from GBC led to the $0.3 million increase in revenue between periods.
Details of noninterest income follow for the six months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006:
Table Eight
Noninterest Income
 
                                 
    Six Months Ended    
    June 30   Increase / (Decrease)
(In thousands)   2007   2006   Amount   Percent
 
Service charges on deposits
  $ 15,332     $ 14,167     $ 1,165       8.2 %
ATM, debit, and merchant fees
    5,080       4,015       1,065       26.5  
Wealth management
    1,660       1,393       267       19.2  
Equity method investment gains, net
    1,805       556       1,249       224.6  
Mortgage services
    1,957       1,335       622       46.6  
Gain on sale of Small Business Administration loans
    509             509        
Brokerage services
    2,088       1,403       685       48.8  
Insurance services
    7,056       7,232       (176 )     (2.4 )
Bank owned life insurance
    2,301       1,677       624       37.2  
Property sale gains, net
    215       188       27       14.4  
Securities gains/(losses), net
    (11 )     32       (43 )     (134.4 )
Other
    1,715       1,285       430       33.5  
 
Noninterest income from continuing operations
    39,707       33,283       6,424       19.3  
Noninterest income from discontinued operations
          1,809       (1,809 )     (100.0 )
 
Total noninterest income
  $ 39,707     $ 35,092     $ 4,615       13.2 %
 
Selected items included in noninterest income for the six months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006 follow. These items are considered non-core to the Corporation’s operations.
Table Nine
Selected Items Included in Noninterest Income
 
                 
    Six Months Ended
    June 30
(In thousands)   2007   2006
 
Securities gains (losses), net
  $ (11 )   $ 32  
Equity method investment gains, net
    1,805       556  
Property sale gains, net
    215       188  
Gains related to reinsurance arrangement
    288       99  
 
Noninterest income from continuing operations increased $6.4 million, or 19.3 percent, to $39.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2007 compared to the same period in 2006. The primary factors for this increase include the following:
   
Revenue from deposit service charges increased $1.2 million, principally reflecting a larger number of checking accounts.
 
   
ATM, debit and merchant card services revenue was $1.1 million higher due to both a larger number of accounts and transactions.

39


Table of Contents

   
Equity method investment gains were $1.2 million higher in the six months ended June 30, 2007, versus the same period of 2006. The returns on the equity method investments vary from period to period and income is recorded when earned.
 
   
Mortgage services revenue increased $0.6 million due to increased originations and sales.
 
   
Although the Corporation originated SBA loans prior to the GBC acquisition, the Corporation retained these loans. Therefore, gains on SBA loan sales were $0.5 million in the first half of 2007, compared to no sales in the same 2006 period.
 
   
Brokerage service revenue increased $0.7 million due to increased production from the addition of several financial consultants in the latter half of 2006.
 
   
The previously mentioned restructuring of bank owned life insurance led to an increase of $0.6 million in revenue between the periods.
 
   
These revenue increases and gains were partially offset by $0.2 million lower insurance services revenue, primarily due to less contingency income recognized in the first six months of 2007, compared with the first six months of 2006.
Noninterest Expense
Details of noninterest expense for the three months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006 follow:
Table Ten
Noninterest Expense
 
                                 
    Three Months Ended    
    June 30   Increase / (Decrease)
(In thousands)   2007   2006   Amount   Percent
 
Salaries and employee benefits
  $ 19,576     $ 16,343     $ 3,233       19.8 %
Occupancy and equipment
    4,759       4,826       (67 )     (1.4 )
Data processing
    1,492       1,448       44       3.0  
Marketing
    1,055       1,196       (141 )     (11.8 )
Postage and supplies
    1,164       1,282       (118 )     (9.2 )
Professional services
    3,181       2,258       923       40.9  
Telecommunications
    519       513       6       1.2  
Amortization of intangibles
    314       107       207       193.5  
Foreclosed properties
    226       418       (192 )     (45.9 )
Other
    2,921       2,297       624       27.2  
 
Noninterest expense from continuing operations
    35,207       30,688       4,519       14.7  
Noninterest expense from discontinued operations
          794       (794 )     (100.0 )
 
Total noninterest expense
  $ 35,207     $ 31,482     $ 3,725       11.8 %
 
Full-time equivalent employees at June 30
    1,109       1,098       11       1.0 %
 
Efficiency ratio (1)
    60.4 %     62.0 %     -1.6 %     (2.6) %
 
(1)  
Noninterest expense divided by the sum of taxable-equivalent net interest income plus noninterest income less securities gains (losses), net. Excludes the results of discontinued operations.

40


Table of Contents

Selected items included in noninterest expense for the three months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006 follow:
Table Eleven
Selected Items Included in Noninterest Expense
 
                 
    Three Months Ended
    June 30
(In thousands)   2007   2006
 
Separation agreements
  $ 183     $  
GBC related executive retirement expense
    245        
Reduction of incentive compensation
    (518 )      
Merger-related costs
           
 
Noninterest expense from continuing operations for the 2007 second quarter was $35.2 million, a $4.5 million increase, compared to the second quarter of 2006. Of this increase, $3.2 million was attributable to salaries and employee benefits expense. Salaries and benefits expense increased in 2007 compared to 2006 primarily due to higher salaries and wages which were driven by an increased number of full-time equivalent employees as a result of the GBC acquisition, increased equity-based compensation, and offset partially by lower incentive compensation due to a reduction in earnings. Additionally, salaries and employee benefits expense included merger-related costs of $0.2 million, representing severance and other compensation-related bonuses for certain employees to remain with Gwinnett Bank for a period of transition following the acquisition. Professional fees increased $0.9 million primarily related to remediation efforts in connection with the Corporation’s internal control weaknesses, additional costs related to the Corporation’s delayed filing of Form 10-K for the year-ended December 31, 2006, and costs associated with the previously disclosed first quarter 2007 audit committee inquiry. The Corporation expects that professional fees will decline over time to more historically normalized levels. Other noninterest expense increased $0.6 million between comparable quarters, principally consisting of increases in insurance, franchise tax, travel, and other miscellaneous operational expense.
Details of noninterest expense for the six months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006 follow:
Table Twelve
Noninterest Expense
 
                                 
    Six Months Ended    
    June 30   Increase / (Decrease)
(In thousands)   2007   2006   Amount   Percent
 
Salaries and employee benefits
  $ 39,163     $ 33,543     $ 5,620       16.8 %
Occupancy and equipment
    9,371       9,531       (160 )     (1.7 )
Data processing
    3,282       2,858       424       14.8  
Marketing
    2,406       2,484       (78 )     (3.1 )
Postage and supplies
    2,336       2,464       (128 )     (5.2 )
Professional services
    6,767       4,161       2,606       62.6  
Telecommunications
    1,190       1,076       114       10.6  
Amortization of intangibles
    537       209       328       156.9  
Foreclosed properties
    379       472       (93 )     (19.7 )
Other
    5,696       4,631       1,065       23.0  
 
Noninterest expense from continuing operations
    71,127       61,429       9,698       15.8  
Noninterest expense from discontinued operations
          1,611       (1,611 )     (100.0 )
 
Total noninterest expense
  $ 71,127     $ 63,040     $ 8,087       12.8 %
 
Full-time equivalent employees at June 30
    1,109       1,098       11       1.0 %
 
Efficiency ratio (1)
    61.7 %     62.0 %     -0.3 %     (0.5) %
 
(1)  
Noninterest expense divided by the sum of taxable-equivalent net interest income plus noninterest income less securities gains (losses), net. Excludes the results of discontinued operations.

41


Table of Contents

Selected items included in noninterest expense for the six months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006 follow:
Table Thirteen
Selected Items Included in Noninterest Expense
 
                 
    Six Months Ended
    June 30
(In thousands)   2007   2006
 
Separation agreements
  $ 241     $ 105  
GBC related executive retirement expense
    245        
Reduction of incentive compensation
    (518 )      
Merger-related costs
    237        
 

42


Table of Contents

Noninterest expense from continuing operations for the first six months of 2007 was $71.1 million, a $9.7 million increase over the same period of 2006. Of this increase, $5.6 million was attributable to salaries and employee benefits expense. Salaries and benefits expense increased in 2007 compared to 2006 primarily due to higher salaries and wages which were driven by an increased number of full-time equivalent employees as a result of the GBC acquisition, as well as normal salary increases, and offset partially by lower incentive compensation due to a reduction in earnings. Additionally, salaries and employee benefits expense included merger-related costs of $0.5 million, representing severance and other compensation-related bonuses for certain employees to remain with Gwinnett Bank for a period of transition following the acquisition as well as executive retirement expenses related to Gwinnett Bank. Professional Fees increased $2.6 million primarily related to remediation efforts in connection with the Corporation’s internal control weaknesses, additional costs related to the Corporation’s delayed filing of Form 10-K for the year-ended December 31, 2006, and costs associated with the previously disclosed first quarter 2007 audit committee inquiry. The Corporation expects that professional fees will decline over time to more historically normalized levels. Data processing expense increased $0.4 million on a year-over-year basis for the second half of 2007 due to increased transaction volume. Other noninterest expense increased $1.1 million between compared periods, principally consisting of increases in insurance, franchise tax, travel and other miscellaneous operational expense.
Income Tax
Income tax expense for the three months ended June 30, 2007, was $4.4 million, for an effective tax rate of 33.0 percent, compared with $5.9 million, for an effective tax rate of 34.3 percent in the second quarter of 2006. For the six months ended June 30, 2007, income tax expense was $11.1 million, for an effective tax rate of 34.2 percent, compared with $11.6 million, for an effective tax rate of 34.0 percent in the six months ended June 30, 2006. The effective tax rate decreased for the three and six months ended June 30, 2007 as a result of a higher proportion of tax-exempt income to total income.
The Corporation is under examination by the North Carolina Department of Revenue for tax years 1999 through 2004 and is subject to examination for subsequent tax years. The Corporation is also under routine examination by the Internal Revenue Service for the 2004 tax year. For additional information regarding these examinations refer to Note 2 of the consolidated financial statements.
As described in Note 14 of the consolidated financial statements, on July 31, 2007, the General Assembly of North Carolina passed House Bill 1473 which includes a provision that disallows the deduction of dividends paid by captive real estate investment trusts (“REITs”) for the purposes of determining North Carolina taxable income. The Corporation, through its subsidiaries, participates in two entities classified as captive REITs from which the Corporation has historically received dividends which resulted in certain tax benefits taken within the Corporation’s tax returns and consolidated financial statements. This legislation is effective for taxable years beginning on or after January 1, 2007.
The Corporation is currently evaluating the impact that this legislation will have on the Corporation’s current and prior tax filings, as well as the related financial statement impact to the Corporation’s effective tax rate and uncertain tax positions. Assuming the legislation eliminates the deductibility of the REIT dividends for North Carolina state income tax purposes, the Corporation expects an increase in its effective tax rate for 2007 and subsequent fiscal years.
Balance Sheet Analysis
 
Securities Available for Sale
The securities portfolio, all of which is classified as available-for-sale, is a component of the Corporation’s Asset Liability Management (“ALM”) strategy. The decision to purchase or sell securities is based upon liquidity needs, changes in interest rates, changes in the Bank’s risk tolerance, the composition of the rest of the balance sheet, and other factors. Securities available-for-sale are accounted for at fair value, with unrealized gains and losses recorded net of tax as a component of other comprehensive income in shareholders’ equity unless the unrealized losses are considered other-than-temporary.
The fair value of the securities portfolio is determined by various third party sources. The valuation is determined as of the end of the reporting period based on available quoted market prices or quoted market prices for similar securities if a quoted market price is not available.
At June 30, 2007, securities available for sale were $898.5 million, compared to $906.4 million at December 31, 2006. Pretax unrealized net losses on securities available for sale were $14.4 million at June 30, 2007, compared to pretax unrealized net losses of $9.8 million at December 31, 2006. The unrealized losses in the securities portfolio have primarily resulted from the rise in interest rates. These unrealized losses have been partially offset by paydowns and maturities of existing securities, totaling $126.0 million, along with the sale of $25.2 million of securities.

43


Table of Contents

During the first half of 2007, proceeds from the aforementioned maturities, along with the sales, paydowns, and calls were used to purchase $148.1 million of securities, principally mortgage-backed and U.S. government agency securities. The asset-backed securities purchased are collateralized debt obligations, representing securitizations of financial company capital securities and were purchased for portfolio risk diversification and their higher yields.
The following table shows the carrying value of (i) U.S. government agency obligations, (ii) mortgage-backed securities, (iii) state, county, and municipal obligations, (iv) asset-backed securities, and (v) equity securities, which are primarily comprised of Federal Reserve and Federal Home Loan Bank stock.
Table Fourteen
Investment Portfolio
 
                 
    June 30   December 31
(In thousands)   2007   2006
 
U.S. government agency obligations
  $ 236,702     $ 275,394  
Mortgage-backed securities
    458,504       412,020  
State, county, and municipal obligations
    92,189       102,602  
Asset-backed securities
    56,057       65,115  
Equity securities
    55,076       51,284  
 
Total securities
  $ 898,528     $ 906,415  
 
Loan Portfolio
The Corporation’s loan portfolio at June 30, 2007, consisted of six major categories: Commercial Non Real Estate, Commercial Real Estate, Construction, Mortgage, Home Equity, and Consumer. Pricing is driven by quality, loan size, loan tenor, prepayment risk, the Corporation’s relationship with the customer, competition, and other factors. The Corporation is primarily a secured lender in all of these loan categories. The terms of the Corporation’s loans are generally five years or less with the exception of home equity lines and residential mortgages, for which the terms can range out to 30 years. In addition, the Corporation has a program in which it buys and sells portions of loans (primarily originated in the Southeastern region of the United States), both participations and syndications, from key strategic partner financial institutions with which the Corporation has established relationships. This strategic partners’ portfolio includes commercial real estate, commercial non real estate, and construction loans. This program enables the Corporation to diversify both its geographic risk and its total exposure risk. From time to time, the Corporation also sources commercial real estate, commercial non real estate, construction, and consumer loans through correspondent relationships. As of June 30, 2007, the Corporation’s total loan portfolio included $336.5 million of loans originated through the strategic partners’ program and correspondent relationships.
Total portfolio loan average balances for the 2007 second quarter increased $511.7 million, or 16.9 percent, to $3.5 billion, compared to $3.0 billion for the 2006 second quarter. Included in the increase was approximately $337 million of total loans that were added as a result of the GBC acquisition during the fourth quarter of 2007. The increase in average loan balances was offset by $8 million of loan balances that were included in the sale of two financial centers during the third quarter of 2006. Commercial loan growth drove the increase, rising $598 million, or 36.5 percent, of which $322 million were added as a result of the GBC acquisition. The remaining growth of $276 million, or 16.9 percent, was the result of commercial lending growth in the Charlotte and Raleigh markets.
Consumer loan average balances decreased $42 million and mortgage loan average balances decreased $45 million compared to the 2006 second quarter. The consumer loan balance decline was driven, in part, by lower consumer borrowing costs of refinancing first mortgages relative to current rates on home equity products. The decline in mortgage loan balances was due to normal loan amortization and First Charter’s strategy of selling most of its new mortgage production in the secondary market. GBC had no residential mortgages on its balance sheet at the time of the acquisition.

44


Table of Contents

At June 30, 2007, Raleigh-related loans totaled $153.0 million, representing a $19.2 million increase from $133.8 million at December 31, 2006.
A summary of the composition of the loan portfolio follows:
Table Fifteen
Loan Portfolio Composition
 
                                 
    June 30   Percent of   December 31   Percent of
(In thousands)   2007   Total Loans   2006   Total Loans
 
Commercial real estate
  $ 1,094,866       30.8 %   $ 1,034,317       29.7 %
Commercial non real estate
    317,984       8.9       301,958       8.7  
Construction
    859,301       24.2       793,294       22.8  
Mortgage
    589,976       16.6       618,142       17.7  
Consumer
    276,005       7.8       289,493       8.3  
Home equity
    415,705       11.7       447,849       12.8  
 
Total portfolio loans
    3,553,837       100.0 %     3,485,053       100.0 %
Allowance for loan losses
    (44,790 )             (34,966 )        
 
Portfolio loans, net
  $ 3,509,047             $ 3,450,087          
 
Deposits
A summary of the composition of deposits follows:
Table Sixteen
Deposits
 
                 
    June 30   December 31
(In thousands)   2007   2006
 
Noninterest bearing demand
  $ 480,078     $ 454,975  
Interest bearing demand
    427,899       420,774  
Money market accounts
    587,691       620,699  
Savings deposits
    114,245       111,047  
Certificates of deposit
    1,620,433       1,640,633  
 
Total deposits
  $ 3,230,346     $ 3,248,128  
 
Deposits totaled $3.2 billion at June 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006. Compared to June 30, 2006, deposits increased by $241.5 million, as a result of overall growth in interest checking balances, combined with the addition of $357.3 million of deposits acquired in the fourth quarter 2006 acquisition of GBC, offset partially by a relatively large number of CDs that matured during the first half of 2007. These maturities included a number of high-rate public fund CDs which the Corporation chose not to renew. Additionally, money market balances decreased $24.2 million from June 30, 2006 primarily due to interest rates on CDs being more favorable than money market rates.
Deposit balances in Raleigh were $53.8 million at June 30, 2007, an increase of $22.0 million from $31.8 million at December 31, 2006.
Deposit growth, particularly low-cost transaction (or core) deposit growth (money market, demand, and savings accounts), continues to be an area of emphasis for the Corporation. For the second quarter of 2007, core deposit average balances increased $117.5 million, or 8.0 percent, compared to the second quarter of 2006. This includes the benefit of the GBC acquisition which included $106.5 million of core deposits and the impact of First Charter’s sale of two financial centers in the third quarter of 2006 which involved the sale of $24 million of core deposits. The total core deposit increase was primarily driven by a $47.5 million, or 8.5 percent, increase in money market average balances, a $39.9 million, or 8.2

45


Table of Contents

percent, increase in interest checking and savings average balances, and a $30.1 million, or 7.0 percent, increase in noninterest-bearing demand deposit average balances.
Certificate of deposit (CD) average balances for the second quarter of 2007 decreased $17.8 million from the fourth quarter of 2006 but grew $318.6 million from the second quarter of 2006. The decrease during the first half of 2007 was primarily due to a relatively large number of CDs that matured. These maturities included a number of high rate public fund CDs which First Charter chose not to renew. The increase in average balances over second quarter 2006 primarily related to the GBC acquisition which added $248.6 million of CD balances. Additionally, CD growth was somewhat offset by the sale of $14 million of CDs in conjunction with the previously mentioned financial center sale that occurred in the third quarter of 2006.
Other Borrowings
Other borrowings consist of federal funds purchased, securities sold under agreement to repurchase, commercial paper and other short- and long-term borrowings. Federal funds purchased represent unsecured overnight borrowings from other financial institutions by the Bank. At June 30, 2007, the Bank had federal funds back-up lines of credit totaling $363.0 million with $88.0 million outstanding, compared to similar lines of credit totaling $188.2 million with $41.5 million outstanding at December 31, 2006. Securities sold under agreements to repurchase represent short-term borrowings by the Bank with maturities less than one year collateralized by a portion of the Corporation’s United States government or agency securities. Securities sold under agreements to repurchase totaled $190.0 million at June 30, 2007, compared to $160.2 million at December 31, 2006. These borrowings are an important source of funding to the Corporation. Access to alternate short-term funding sources allows the Corporation to meet funding needs without relying on increasing deposits on a short-term basis.
The Corporation issues commercial paper as another source of short-term funding. It is purchased primarily by the Bank’s commercial deposit clients. Commercial paper outstanding at June 30, 2007 was $77.8 million, compared to $38.2 million at December 31, 2006.
Other short-term borrowings consist of the Federal Home Loan Bank (“FHLB”) borrowings with an original maturity of one year or less. FHLB borrowings are collateralized by securities from the Corporation’s investment portfolio, and a blanket lien on certain qualifying commercial and single-family loans held in the Corporation’s loan portfolio. At June 30, 2007, the Bank had $265.0 million of short-term FHLB borrowings, compared to the Bank’s $371.0 million at December 31, 2006. The Corporation, in its overall management of interest-rate risk, is opportunistic in evaluating alternative funding sources. While balancing the funding needs of the Corporation, management considers the duration of available maturities, the relative attractiveness of funding costs, and the diversification of funding sources, among other factors, in order to maintain flexibility in the nature of deposits and borrowings the Corporation holds at any given time.
Long-term borrowings represent FHLB borrowings with original maturities greater than one year and subordinated debentures related to trust preferred securities. At June 30, 2007, the Bank had $555.9 million of long-term FHLB borrowings, compared to $425.9 million at December 31, 2006. In addition, the Corporation had $61.9 million of outstanding subordinated debentures at June 30, 2007, and December 31, 2006.
The Corporation formed First Charter Capital Trust I and First Charter Capital Trust II, in June 2005 and September 2005, respectively; both are wholly-owned business trusts. First Charter Capital Trust I and First Charter Capital Trust II issued $35.0 million and $25.0 million, respectively, of trust preferred securities that were sold to third parties. The proceeds of the sale of the trust preferred securities were used to purchase subordinated debentures discussed above from the Corporation, which are presented as long-term borrowings in the consolidated balance sheet and qualify for inclusion in Tier 1 capital for regulatory capital purposes, subject to certain limitations.

46


Table of Contents

Credit Risk Management
 
The Corporation’s credit risk policy and procedures are centralized for every loan type. In addition, all mortgage, consumer, and home equity loans are centrally decisioned. All loans generally flow through an independent closing unit to ensure proper documentation. Loans originated by the Corporation’s Atlanta-based lenders are currently being processed and closed independently from the Corporation’s centralized credit structure. Finally, all known collection or problem loans are centrally managed by experienced workout personnel. To monitor the effectiveness of policies and procedures, Management maintains a set of asset quality standards for past due, nonaccrual, and watchlist loans and monitors the trends of these standards over time. These standards are approved by the Board of Directors and reviewed quarterly with the Board of Directors for compliance.
Loan Administration and Underwriting
The Bank’s Chief Risk Officer is responsible for the continuous assessment of the Bank’s risk profile as well as making any necessary adjustments to policies and procedures. Commercial loan relationships of less than $750,000 may be approved by experienced commercial loan officers, within their loan authority. Commercial and commercial real estate loans are approved by signature authority requiring at least two experienced officers for relationships greater than $750,000. The exceptions to this include City Executives and certain Senior Loan Officers who are authorized to approve relationships up to $1.0 million. An independent Risk Manager is involved in the approval of commercial and commercial real estate relationships that exceed $1.0 million. All relationships greater than $2.0 million receive a comprehensive annual review by either the senior credit analysts or lending officers of the Bank, which is then reviewed by the independent Risk Managers and/or the final approval officer with the appropriate signature authority. Relationships totaling $5.0 million or more are further reviewed by senior lending officers of the Bank, the Chief Risk Officer, and the Credit Risk Management Committee comprised of certain executive and senior management. In addition, relationships totaling $10.0 million or more are reviewed by the Board of Directors’ Credit and Compliance Committee. These oversight committees provide policy, process, product and specific relationship direction to the lending personnel. As of June 30, 2007, the Corporation had a legal lending limit of $68.4 million and a general target-lending limit of $10.0 million per relationship.
The Corporation’s loan portfolio consists of loans made for a variety of commercial and consumer purposes. Because commercial loans are made based to a great extent on the Corporation’s assessment of a borrower’s income, cash flow, character and ability to repay, such loans are viewed as involving a higher degree of credit risk than is the case with residential mortgage loans or consumer loans. To manage this risk, the Corporation’s commercial loan portfolio is managed under a defined process which includes underwriting standards and risk assessment, procedures for loan approvals, loan grading, ongoing identification and management of credit deterioration and portfolio reviews to assess loss exposure and to ascertain compliance with the Corporation’s credit policies and procedures.
During 2006, the Corporation implemented a new consumer loan platform to improve servicing for customers by providing loan officers with additional tools and real-time access to credit bureau information at the time of loan application. This platform also delivers increased reporting capabilities and improved credit risk management by having the Corporation’s policies embedded into the decision process while also managing approval authority limits for credit exposure and reporting.
In general, consumer loans (including mortgage and home equity) have a lower risk profile than commercial loans. Commercial loans (including commercial real estate, commercial non real estate and construction loans) are generally larger in size and more complex than consumer loans. Commercial real estate loans are deemed less risky than commercial non real estate and construction loans, because the collateral value of real estate generally maintains its value better than non real estate or construction collateral. Consumer loans, which are smaller in size and more geographically diverse across the Corporation’s entire primary market area, provide risk diversity across the portfolio. Because mortgage

47


Table of Contents

loans are secured by first liens on the consumer’s residential real estate, they are the Corporation’s lowest risk profile loan type. Home equity loans are deemed less risky than unsecured consumer loans, as home equity loans and lines are secured by first or second deeds of trust on the borrower’s residential real estate. A centralized decision-making process is in place to control the risk of the consumer, home equity, and mortgage loan portfolio. The consumer real estate appraisal process is also centralized relative to appraisal engagement, appraisal review, and appraiser quality assessment. These processes are detailed in the underwriting guidelines, which cover each retail loan product type from underwriting, servicing, compliance issues and closing procedures.
Periodically, the Corporation finances consumer lot loans in association with developer lot loan programs. As previously disclosed, during the second quarter, the Bank identified a large exposure to undeveloped lots in real estate development projects in Spruce Pine, NC. As a result of this finding, policies and procedures associated with participation in developer lot programs have been enhanced to mitigate potential concentration and construction risk. Enhancements include: 1) commercial underwriting of development projects prior to entering into lot programs to identify potential construction risks, 2) modification of the consumer loan application to include the collection of data for developer, subdivision, and development status of the financed lot in order to provide improved concentration reporting, 3) adjustments in policy to restrict consumer loan origination to borrowers located in the Corporation’s primary markets, and 4) strengthened internal controls to enhance the Corporation’s ability to identify fraud.
At June 30, 2007, the substantial majority of the total loan portfolio, including the commercial and real estate portfolio, represented loans to borrowers within the Metro regions of Charlotte and Raleigh, North Carolina and Atlanta, Georgia. The diverse economic base of these regions tends to provide a stable lending environment; however, an economic downturn in the Charlotte region, the Corporation’s primary market area, could adversely affect its business.
Additionally, the Corporation’s loan portfolio consists of certain non-traditional loan products. Some of these products include interest-only loans, loans with initial interest rates that are below the market interest rate for the initial period of the loan-term and may increase when that period ends and loans with a high loan-to-value ratio. Based on the Corporation’s assessment, these products do not give rise to a concentration of credit risk.
Derivatives
The Corporation enters into interest rate swap agreements or other derivative transactions as business conditions warrant. As of June 30, 2007, and December 31, 2006, the Corporation had no interest rate swap agreements or other derivative transactions outstanding.
Nonperforming Assets
Nonperforming assets are comprised of nonaccrual loans and other real estate owned (“OREO”). The nonaccrual status is determined after a loan is 90 days past due or when deemed not collectible in full as to principal or interest, unless in management’s opinion collection of both principal and interest is assured by way of collateralization, guarantees, or other security and the loan is in the process of collection. OREO represents real estate acquired through foreclosure or deed in lieu thereof and is generally carried at the lower of cost or fair value, less estimated costs to sell.
Management’s policy for any accruing loan greater than 90 days past due is to perform an analysis of the loan, including a consideration of the financial position of the borrower and any guarantor, as well as the value of the collateral, and use this information to make an assessment as to whether collectibility of the principal and interest appears probable. If such collectibility is not probable, the loans are placed on nonaccrual status. Loans are returned to accrual status when management determines, based on an evaluation of the underlying collateral together with the borrower’s payment record and financial

48


Table of Contents

condition, that the borrower has the ability and intent to meet the contractual obligations of the loan agreement. As of June 30, 2007, no loans were 90 days or more past due and still accruing interest.
A summary of nonperforming assets follow:
Table Seventeen
Nonperforming Assets
 
                                         
    June 30     March 31     December 31     September 30     June 30  
(In thousands)   2007     2007     2006     2006     2006  
 
Nonaccrual loans
  $ 17,387     $ 10,943     $ 8,200     $ 7,090     $ 7,763  
Loans 90 days or more past due accruing interest
                             
 
Total nonperforming loans
    17,387       10,943       8,200       7,090       7,763  
Other real estate
    2,726       6,330       6,477       5,601       5,902  
 
Nonperforming assets
  $ 20,113     $ 17,273     $ 14,677     $ 12,691     $ 13,665  
 
Nonaccrual loans as a percentage of total portfolio loans
    0.49 %     0.31 %     0.24 %     0.23 %     0.25 %
Nonperforming assets as a percentage of:
                                       
Total assets
    0.41       0.35       0.30       0.29       0.31  
Total portfolio loans and other real estate owned
    0.57       0.49       0.42       0.41       0.44  
Net charge-offs to average portfolio loans
    0.02       0.06       0.08       0.13       0.11  
Allowance for loan losses to portfolio loans
    1.26       1.02       1.00       0.97       0.96  
Allowance for loan losses to net charge-offs
    59.40 x      18.50     13.56     7.50     8.51
Allowance for loan losses to nonperforming loans
    2.58 x      3.28     4.26     4.22     3.80
 
Nonaccrual loans totaled $17.4 million, or 0.49 percent of total portfolio loans, at June 30, 2007, representing a $9.2 million increase from $8.2 million, or 0.24 percent of total portfolio loans at December 31, 2006, and a $9.6 million increase from $7.8 million, or 0.25 percent, of total portfolio loans at June 30, 2006. Nonperforming assets as a percentage of total loans and OREO increased to 0.57 percent at June 30, 2007, compared to 0.42 percent at December 31, 2006 and 0.44 percent at June 30, 2006.
During the second quarter of 2007, $5.4 million of Penland lot loans were placed on nonaccrual status. One commercial relationship was the principal contributor to the remaining increase in nonperforming loans between December 31, 2006, and June 30, 2007. As of December 31, 2006, management had identified a $2.8 million commercial acquisition and development loan as a potential problem loan. At that time, management anticipated the borrower would cure the delinquency to keep the loan from reaching 90 days past due. In January 2007, this loan became 90 days past due and was placed on nonaccrual status. During the first six months of 2007, payments of $0.3 million were received, and as of June 30, 2007, the outstanding balance on this loan was $2.5 million.
Nonaccrual loans at June 30, 2007 were concentrated 31 percent in the Penland lot loans and 33 percent in loans originated in the Atlanta market. There were no other significant geographic concentrations. Nonaccrual loans primarily consisted of loans secured by real estate, including single-family residential and development construction loans. Nonaccrual loans as a percentage of loans may increase or decrease as economic conditions change. Management takes current economic conditions into consideration when estimating the allowance for loan losses. See Allowance for Loan Losses for a more detailed discussion.
Allowance for Loan Losses
The Corporation’s allowance for loan losses consists of three components: (i) valuation allowances computed on impaired loans in accordance with SFAS 114, Accounting by Creditors for Impairment of a Loan – an Amendment to FASB Statements No. 5 and No. 15; (ii) valuation allowances determined by applying historical loss rates to those loans not specifically identified as impaired; and (iii) valuation allowances for factors which management believes are not reflected in the historical loss rates or that otherwise need to be considered when estimating the allowance for loan losses. These three components are estimated quarterly and, along with a narrative analysis, comprise the Corporation’s allowance for loan losses model. The resulting components are used by management to determine the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses. Beginning January 1, 2007, the Corporation began including consumer and residential mortgage loans with outstanding principal balances of $150,000 or greater in its

49


Table of Contents

computation of impaired loans calculated under SFAS 114. The application of this methodology conforms the consumer and residential mortgage loan analysis to the Corporation’s SFAS 114 analysis for commercial loans.
All estimates of loan portfolio risk, including the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses, are subject to general and local economic conditions, among other factors, which are unpredictable and beyond the Corporation’s control. Because a significant portion of the loan portfolio is comprised of real estate loans and loans to area businesses, the Corporation is subject to risk in the real estate market and changes in the economic conditions in its primary market areas. Changes in these areas can increase or decrease the provision for loan losses.
During the six months ended June 30, 2007, the Corporation made no changes to its estimated loss percentages for economic factors. As a part of its quarterly assessment of the allowance for loan losses, the Corporation reviews key local, regional and national economic information and assesses its impact on the allowance for loan losses. Based on its review for the six months ended June 30, 2007, the Corporation noted that economic conditions are mixed; however, management concluded that the impact on borrowers and local industries in the Corporation’s primary market areas did not change significantly during the period. Accordingly, the Corporation did not modify its loss estimate percentage attributable to economic factors in its allowance for loan losses model.
The Corporation continuously reviews its portfolio for any concentrations of loans to any one borrower or industry. To analyze its concentrations, the Corporation prepares various reports showing total risk concentrations to borrowers by industry, as well as reports showing total risk concentrations to one borrower. At the present time, the Corporation does not believe it has concentrations of risk in any one industry or specific borrower and, therefore, has made no allocations of allowances for loan losses for this factor for any of the periods presented.
The Corporation also monitors the amount of operational risk that exists in the portfolio. This would include the front-end underwriting, documentation and closing processes associated with the lending decision. During the quarter ended June 30, 2007, the Corporation increased the additional allocation for operational reserve on its consumer lot loan portfolio. This increase was tied to weaknesses uncovered in identifying and reporting consumer lot loan exposure. As previously discussed, steps have been taken to mitigate the increased risk identified. This was the only change to the additional allocation for operational reserve during the six months ended June 30, 2007.

50


Table of Contents

Changes in the allowance for loan losses follow:
Table Eighteen
Allowance For Loan Losses
                                 
 
    Three Months Ended   Six Months Ended
    June 30   June 30
(In thousands)   2007   2006   2007   2006
 
Balance at beginning of period
  $ 35,854     $ 29,505     $ 34,966     $ 28,725  
Charge-offs
                               
Commercial non real estate
    113       108       359       359  
Commercial real estate
    127       260       140       335  
Mortgage
    35       10       68       21  
Home equity
    64       447       194       948  
Consumer
    208       310       572       701  
 
Total charge-offs
    547       1,135       1,333       2,364  
 
Recoveries
                               
Commercial non real estate
    229       111       317       439  
Mortgage
    27             52        
Consumer
    103       159       298       321  
 
Total recoveries
    359       270       667       760  
 
Net charge-offs
    188       865       666       1,604  
 
Provision for loan losses
    9,124       880       10,490       2,399  
 
Balance at end of period
  $ 44,790     $ 29,520     $ 44,790     $ 29,520  
 
Average portfolio loans
  $ 3,532,713     $ 3,021,004     $ 3,521,637     $ 2,980,344  
Net charge-offs to average portfolio loans (annualized)
    0.02       0.11 %     0.04       0.11 %
Allowance for loan losses to portfolio loans
    1.26       0.96       1.26       0.96  
 
The allowance for loan losses was $44.8 million, or 1.26 percent of portfolio loans, at June 30, 2007, compared to $29.5 million, or 0.96 percent of portfolio loans, at June 30, 2006. The increase includes the previously discussed $7.8 million provision recorded in connection with the Penland lot loans. Additionally, the Corporation’s addition of GBC’s largely commercial lot loan portfolio, a smaller concentration of lower risk home equity and mortgage loan balances, and First Charter’s credit migration trends led to the higher allowance for loan loss ratio.
Management considers the allowance for loan losses adequate to cover inherent losses in the Corporation’s loan portfolio as of the date of the financial statements. Management believes it has established the allowance in consideration of the current and expected future economic environment. While management uses the best information available to make evaluations, future adjustments to the allowance may be necessary based on changes in economic and other conditions. Additionally, various regulatory agencies, as an integral part of their examination process, periodically review the Corporation’s allowances for loan losses. Such agencies may require the recognition of adjustments to the allowance based on their judgment of information available to them at the time of their examinations.

51


Table of Contents

Provision for Loan Losses
The provision for loan losses is the amount charged to earnings, which is necessary to maintain an adequate and appropriate allowance for loan losses. Accordingly, the factors, which influence changes in the allowance for loan losses, have a direct effect on the provision for loan losses. The allowance for loan losses changes from period to period as a result of a number of factors, the most significant of which for the Corporation include the following: (i) changes in the amounts of loans outstanding, which are used to estimate current probable loan losses; (ii) current charge-offs and recoveries of loans; (iii) changes in impaired loan valuation allowances; (iv) changes in credit grades within the portfolio, which arise from a deterioration or an improvement in the performance of the borrower; (v) changes in loss percentages; and (vi) changes in the mix of types of loans. In addition, the Corporation considers other, more subjective factors, which impact the credit quality of the portfolio as a whole and estimates allocations of allowance for loan losses for these factors, as well. These factors include loan concentrations, economic conditions and operational risks. Changes in these components of the allowance can arise from fluctuations in the underlying percentages used as related loss estimates for these factors, as well as variations in the portfolio balances to which they are applied. The net change in all of these components of the allowance for loan losses results in the provision for loan losses. For a more detailed discussion of the Corporation’s process for estimating the allowance for loan losses, see Allowance for Loan Losses.
The provision for loan losses was $9.1 million for the 2007 second quarter, while net charge-offs were $0.2 million, or 0.02 percent of average portfolio loans. For the same year-ago period, the provision for loan losses was $0.9 million and net charge-offs were $0.9 million, or 0.11 percent of average portfolio loans. For the six months ended June 30, 2007, the provision for loan losses was $10.5 million, while net charge-offs were $0.7 million, or 0.04 percent of average portfolio loans. For the six months ended June 30, 2006, the provision for loan losses was $2.4 million, while net charge-offs were $1.6 million, or 0.11 percent of average portfolio loans.
The provision for loan losses for the three and six months ended June 30, 2007 increased primarily as a result of recording an addition provision of $7.8 million related to the previously discussed Penland lot loans. The remainder of the increase was primarily due to a change in the composition of the loan portfolio as the percentage of commercial loans continues to increase.
Market Risk Management
 
Asset-Liability Management and Interest Rate Risk
Interest rate risk is the exposure of earnings and capital to changes in interest rates. The objective of Asset-Liability Management (“ALM”) is to quantify and manage the change in interest rate risk associated with the Corporation’s balance sheet. The management of the ALM program includes oversight from the Board of Director’s Asset and Liability Committee (“Board ALCO”) and the Management Asset and Liability Committee (“Management ALCO”). Two primary metrics used in analyzing interest rate risk are earnings at risk (“EAR”) and economic value of equity (“EVE”). The Board of Directors has established limits on the EAR and EVE risk measures. Management ALCO, comprised of select members of executive and senior management, is charged with measuring performance relative to those limits and reporting the Bank’s performance to Board ALCO. Interest rate risk is measured and monitored through simulation modeling. The process is validated regularly by an independent third party.
Both the EAR and the EVE risk measures were within policy guidelines as of June 30, 2007, and December 31, 2006.
Management considers EAR to be the best measure of short-term interest rate risk. This measure reflects the amount of net interest income that will be impacted by a change in interest rates over a 12- month time frame. A simulation model is used to run immediate and parallel changes in interest rates (rate

52


Table of Contents

shocks) from a base scenario using implied forward rates. At a minimum, rate shock scenarios are run at plus and minus 100, 200, and 300 basis points. From time to time, additional simulations are run to assess risk from changes in the slope of the yield curve. The simulation model projects the net interest income over the next 12 months for each scenario using consistent balance sheet growth projections and calculates the percentage change from the base scenario. Board ALCO has approved a policy limit for the change in EAR over a 12-month period of minus 10 percent to a plus or minus 200 basis point shock to interest rates. At June 30, 2007, the estimated EAR to a 200 basis point increase in rates was plus 4.4 percent while the estimated EAR to a 200 basis point decrease in rates was minus 7.1 percent. This compares with plus 4.7 percent and minus 5.6 percent, respectively, at December 31, 2006. A change in the earning asset and funding mix contributed to the change in the EAR measures from December 31, 2006.
Management considers EVE to be the best measure of long-term interest rate risk. This measure reflects the amount of net equity that will be impacted by changes in interest rates. Through simulation modeling, the Corporation estimates the economic value of assets and the economic value of liabilities. The difference between these two measures is the EVE. The EVE is calculated for a series of scenarios in which current rates are shocked up and down by 100, 200, and 300 basis points and compared to a base scenario using the current yield curve. Board ALCO has approved a policy limit for the percentage change in EVE of minus 15 percent to a plus or minus 200 basis point shock to interest rates. At June 30, 2007, the estimated EVE to a 200 basis point increase in rates was minus 9.2 percent, while the estimated EVE to a 200 basis point decrease in rates was plus 3.6 percent. At December 31, 2006, EVE risk was minus 7.4 percent and plus 3.1 percent, respectively. Changes in market rates and prepayment expectations accounted for the majority of the change in the EVE measure from December 31, 2006.
The result of any simulation is inherently uncertain and will not precisely estimate the impact of changes in rates on net interest income or the economic value of assets and liabilities. Actual results may differ from simulated results due to, but not limited to, the timing and magnitude of the change in interest rates, changes in management strategies, and changes in market conditions.
Table Nineteen summarizes, as of June 30, 2007, the expected maturities and weighted average effective yields and rates associated with certain of the Corporation’s significant non-trading financial instruments. Cash and cash equivalents, federal funds sold, and interest-bearing bank deposits are excluded from Table Nineteen as their respective carrying values approximate fair value. These financial instruments generally expose the Corporation to insignificant market risk as they have either no stated maturities or an average maturity of less than 30 days and interest rates that approximate market rates. However, these financial instruments could expose the Corporation to interest rate risk by requiring more or less reliance on alternative funding sources, such as long-term debt. The mortgage-backed securities are shown at their weighted-average expected life, obtained from an independent evaluation of the average remaining life of each security based on expected prepayment speeds of the underlying mortgages at June 30, 2007. These expected maturities, weighted-average effective yields, and fair values would change if interest rates change. Expected maturities for indeterminate demand, money market and savings deposits are estimated based on historical average lives.

53


Table of Contents

Table Nineteen
Market Risk
                                                         
 
            Expected Maturity
(Dollars in thousands)   Total   1 Year   2 Years   3 Years   4 Years   5 Years   Thereafter
 
Assets
                                                       
Debt securities
                                                       
Fixed rate
                                                       
Cost
  $ 735,571     $ 342,550     $ 217,796     $ 102,183     $ 41,777     $ 8,730     $ 22,535  
Weighted-average effective yield
    4.81 %                                                
Fair value
  $ 725,881                                                  
Variable rate
                                                       
Cost
  $ 177,313       26,562       26,393       26,586       9,626       5,038       83,108  
Weighted-average effective yield
    4.39 %                                                
Fair value
  $ 172,647                                                  
Loans and loans held for sale
                                                       
Fixed rate
                                                       
Book value
  $ 990,947       232,169       213,689       171,377       120,030       121,088       132,594  
Weighted-average effective yield
    7.15 %                                                
Fair value
  $ 976,903                                                  
Variable rate
                                                       
Book value
  $ 2,529,571       1,287,254       333,563       194,519       98,979       72,320       542,936  
Weighted-average effective yield
    7.83 %                                                
Fair value
  $ 2,527,403                                                  
 
Liabilities
                                                       
Deposits
                                                       
Fixed rate
                                                       
Book value
  $ 1,620,433       1,443,986       152,169       11,061       6,742       5,353       1,122  
Weighted-average effective yield
    4.79 %                                                
Fair value
  $ 1,624,318                                                  
Variable rate Book value
  $ 1,129,834       354,624       250,258       249,746       122,553       71,700       80,953  
Weighted-average effective yield
    2.23 %                                                
Fair value
  $ 1,049,275                                                  
Long-term borrowings
                                                       
Fixed rate
                                                       
Book value
  $ 345,905       200,056       70,058       25,062       50,054       22       653  
Weighted-average effective yield
    4.65 %                                                
Fair value
  $ 339,224                                                  
Variable rate
                                                       
Book value
  $ 271,857       185,000       25,000                         61,857  
Weighted-average effective yield
    5.32 %                                                
Fair value
  $ 271,486                                                  
 
Off-Balance-Sheet Risk
The Corporation is party to financial instruments with off-balance-sheet risk in the normal course of business to meet the financing needs of its customers. These financial instruments include commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit. These instruments involve, to varying degrees, elements of credit and interest rate risk in excess of the amount recognized in the consolidated financial statements. Commitments to extend credit are agreements to lend to a customer so long as there is no violation of any condition established in the contract. Commitments generally have fixed expiration dates and may require collateral from the borrower if deemed necessary by the Corporation. Included in loan commitments are commitments of $38.6 million to cover customer deposit account overdrafts should they occur. Standby letters of credit are conditional commitments issued by the Corporation to guarantee the performance of a customer to a third party up to a stipulated amount and with specified terms and conditions. Standby letters of credit are recorded as a liability by the Corporation at the fair value of the obligation undertaken in issuing the guarantee. Commitments to extend credit are not recorded as an asset or liability by the Corporation until the instrument is exercised. Refer to Note 12 of the consolidated financial statements for further discussion of these commitments. The Corporation does not have any off-balance sheet financing arrangements, other than the trust preferred securities.

54


Table of Contents

The following table presents, as of June 30, 2007, aggregated information and expected maturities of commitments.
Table Twenty
Commitments
                                               
 
    Less than               Timing not    
(In thousands)   1 year   1-3 Years   4-5 Years   Over 5 Years   determinable   Total
 
Loan commitments
  $ 703,813     $ 118,172     $ 42,662     $ 59,637     $   $ 924,284  
Lines of credit
    31,390       1,639       2,921       455,613         491,563  
Standby letters of credit
    22,920       3,548                     26,468  
Anticipated tax settlements
    584                         10,551     11,135  
 
Total commitments
  $ 758,707     $ 123,359     $ 45,583     $ 515,250     $ 10,551   $ 1,453,450  
 
Commitments to extend credit, including loan commitments, standby letters of credit, anticipated tax settlements and commercial letters of credit do not necessarily represent future cash requirements, in that these commitments often expire without being drawn upon.
Liquidity Risk
Liquidity is the ability to maintain cash flows adequate to fund operations and meet obligations and other commitments on a timely and cost-effective basis. Liquidity is provided by the ability to attract retail deposits, by current earnings, and by a strong capital base that enables the Corporation to use alternative funding sources that complement normal sources. Management’s asset-liability policy includes optimizing net interest income while continuing to provide adequate liquidity to meet continuing loan demand and deposit withdrawal requirements and to service normal operating expenses.
Liquidity is managed at two levels. The first is the liquidity of the Corporation. The second is the liquidity of the Bank. The management of liquidity at both levels is essential, because the Corporation and the Bank have different funding needs and sources, and each are subject to certain regulatory guidelines and requirements.
The primary source of funding for the Corporation includes dividends received from the Bank and proceeds from the issuance of common stock. In addition, the Corporation had commercial paper outstanding of $77.8 million at June 30, 2007. Primary uses of funds for the Corporation include repayment of commercial paper, share repurchases, operating expenses, and dividends paid to shareholders. During 2005, the Corporation issued trust preferred securities through specially formed trusts in an aggregate amount of $60.0 million. The proceeds from the sale of the trust preferred securities were used to purchase $61.9 million of subordinated debentures from the Corporation (the “Notes”). The Notes are presented as long-term borrowings in the consolidated balance sheet and are includable in Tier 1 capital for regulatory capital purposes, subject to certain limitations.
Primary sources of funding for the Bank include customer deposits, wholesale deposits, other borrowings, loan repayments, and available-for-sale securities. The Bank has access to federal funds lines from various banks and borrowings from the Federal Reserve discount window. In addition to these sources, the Bank is a member of the FHLB, which provides access to FHLB lending sources. At June 30, 2007, the Bank had a maximum line of credit with the FHLB totaling $1.5 billion with $820.9 million outstanding. At June 30, 2007, the Bank also had $363.0 million of federal funds lines with $88.0 million outstanding. Primary uses of funds include repayment of maturing obligations and growing the loan portfolio.
Management believes the Corporation’s and the Bank’s sources of liquidity are adequate to meet loan demand, operating needs, and deposit withdrawal requirements.

55


Table of Contents

Capital Management
 
The Corporation views capital as its most valuable and most expensive funding source. The objective of effective capital management is to generate above-market returns on equity to the Corporation’s shareholders while maintaining adequate regulatory capital ratios. Some of the Corporation’s primary uses of capital include funding growth, asset acquisition, dividend payments, and common stock repurchases.
Select capital measures follow:
Table Twenty-one
Capital Measures
                                 
 
    June 30   December 31
    2007   2006
(Dollars in thousands)   Amount   Ratio   Amount   Ratio
 
Total equity/total assets
                               
First Charter Corporation
  $ 445,828       9.07 %   $ 447,362       9.21 %
First Charter Bank
    481,001       9.82       371,459       8.45  
 
                               
Tangible equity/tangible assets (1)
                               
First Charter Corporation
  $ 361,721       7.48 %   $ 362,294       7.59 %
First Charter Bank
    396,894       8.24       351,246       8.03  
 
(1)  
The tangible equity ratio excludes goodwill and other intangible assets from both the numerator and the denominator.
Shareholders’ equity at June 30, 2007, decreased to $445.8 million, representing 9.1 percent of period-end total assets, compared to $447.4 million, or 9.2 percent, of period-end total assets at December 31, 2006. This decrease was primarily due to cash dividends of $0.39 per common share, which resulted in cash dividend declarations of $13.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2007 and the repurchase of 500,000 shares of stock during the second quarter which decreased equity $10.6 million. In addition, accumulated other comprehensive loss (after-tax unrealized losses on available-for-sale securities) increased $2.8 million to $8.7 million at June 30, 2007, compared to $5.9 million at December 31, 2006. The decrease in shareholders’ equity was partially offset by net income of $21.3 million and $4.9 million of stock issued under stock-based compensation plans and the Corporation’s dividend reinvestment plan.
On January 23, 2002, the Corporation’s Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of up to 1.5 million shares of the Corporation’s common stock. As of June 30, 2007, the Corporation had repurchased all of shares of its common stock under this authorization, including 125,400 shares repurchased during the second quarter of 2007, at an average per-share price of $17.82, which has reduced shareholders’ equity by $27.1 million.
On October 24, 2003, the Corporation’s Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of up to 1.5 million additional shares of the Corporation’s common stock. During the quarter ending June 30, 2007, the Corporation repurchased 374,600 shares under this authorization at an average per-share price of $21.19, which has reduced shareholders’ equity by $8.0 million.
The Corporation has remaining authority to repurchase 1.1 million shares of its common stock.
During 2005, the Corporation issued trust preferred securities through specially formed trusts in an aggregate amount of $60.0 million. The proceeds from the sale of the trust preferred securities were used to purchase $61.9 million of subordinated debentures from the Corporation (the “Notes”). The Notes are presented as long-term borrowings in the consolidated balance sheet and are includable in Tier 1 capital for regulatory capital purposes, subject to certain limitations.
The Corporation’s and the Bank’s various regulators have issued regulatory capital guidelines for U.S. banking organizations. Failure to meet the capital requirements can initiate certain mandatory and

56


Table of Contents

discretionary actions by regulators that could have a material effect on the Corporation’s financial position and results of operations. At June 30, 2007, the Corporation and the Bank were classified as “well capitalized” under these regulatory frameworks.
The Corporation’s and the Bank’s actual capital amounts and ratios at June 30, 2007 follow:
Table Twenty-two
Capital Ratios
                                                 
 
                    For Capital    
                    Adequacy Purposes   To Be Well Capitalized
    Actual                   Minimum           Minimum
(Dollars in thousands)   Amount   Ratio   Amount   Ratio   Amount   Ratio
 
 
Leverage
                                               
First Charter Corporation
  $ 430,373       8.97 %   $ 192,023       4.00 %   None   None
First Charter Bank
    411,177       8.57       191,914       4.00     $ 239,893       5.00 %
 
                                               
Tier I Capital
                                               
First Charter Corporation
  $ 430,373       10.57 %   $ 162,932       4.00 %   None   None
First Charter Bank
    411,177       10.10       162,782       4.00     $ 244,174       6.00 %
 
                                               
Total Risk-Based Capital
                                               
First Charter Corporation
  $ 475,358       11.67 %   $ 325,863       8.00 %   None   None
First Charter Bank
    455,967       11.20       325,565       8.00     $ 406,956       10.00 %
 
In the third quarter 2007, the Corporation anticipates opening a new branch in Cabarrus County, North Carolina. The opening of this branch will result in additional depreciation and related expenses. Opening this new branch is part of the Corporation’s growth strategy for generating new deposit growth and the related revenues associated with the accounts and other products.
Regulatory Recommendations
 
Management is not presently aware of any current recommendations to the Corporation or to the Bank by regulatory authorities, which if they were to be implemented, would have a material effect on the Corporation’s liquidity, capital resources, or operations.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements and Developments
 
Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements discusses new accounting pronouncements adopted by the Corporation during 2007 and other recently issued pronouncements that have not yet been adopted by the Corporation. To the extent the adoption of new accounting pronouncements materially affects financial condition, results of operations, or liquidity, the effects are discussed in the applicable section of Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations and Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
From time to time, the FASB issues exposure drafts for proposed statements of financial accounting standards. Such exposure drafts are subject to comment from the public, to revisions by the FASB and to final issuance by the FASB as statements of financial accounting standards. Management considers the effect of the proposed statements on the consolidated financial statements of the Corporation and monitors the status of changes to and proposed effective dates of exposure drafts.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
See Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations — Market Risk Management — Asset-Liability Management and Interest Rate Risk on pages 52-54 for Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk.

57


Table of Contents

Item 4. Controls and Procedures
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
As of June 30, 2007, the end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, an evaluation of the effectiveness of the Registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13(a)-15(e) and 15d-15(e) promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”)) was performed under the supervision and with the participation of the Registrant’s management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer. Based on that evaluation and the identification of the material weaknesses in the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting as described in the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006 (the “Material Weaknesses”), the Registrant’s Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer have concluded that the Registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures were not effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Registrant in its reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is (i) recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities Exchange Commission’s rules and forms, and (ii) accumulated and communicated to the Registrant’s management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
As disclosed in Item 9A. Controls and Procedures of the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006, management has begun to implement a comprehensive plan for remedying the Material Weaknesses (the “Remediation Plan”). In furtherance of the Remediation Plan, the following changes in the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) of the Exchange Act), have occurred during or following the quarter ended June 30, 2007.
The Registrant has enhanced its internal governance and compliance function. Periodic and regular meetings are being held with the internal governance and compliance functions to discuss and coordinate operational, compliance and financial matters as well as the progress of the Remediation Plan.
   
The Registrant has reassessed, reviewed, and approved the charters that govern the internal governance and compliance functions which include, but are not limited to, the Disclosure Committee, Compliance Risk Committee, Asset and Liability Committee, Technology Steering Committee, Sarbanes Oxley Review Committee. Where deemed necessary, various amendments to these documents have also been adopted. The Registrant’s Management has communicated the charters to the respective internal governance and compliance functions.
 
   
These functions also have reassessed their reporting practices and have enhanced their evaluation processes.
Except as discussed above, there have been no changes in the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the quarter ended June 30, 2007, that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

58


Table of Contents

PART II — OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
The Corporation and the Bank are defendants in certain claims and legal actions arising in the ordinary course of business. In the opinion of management, after consultation with legal counsel, the ultimate disposition of these matters is not expected to have a material adverse effect on the consolidated results of operations, liquidity, or financial condition of the Corporation or the Bank.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
As previously disclosed, on April 5, 2007, the Corporation filed its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006. As a result of this filing, on April 9, 2007, NASDAQ notified the Corporation that it had regained compliance with NASDAQ Rule 4310 (c) (14). Consequently, the Corporation’s common stock is no longer subject to delisting by NASDAQ.
With the exception of the change noted above, there have been no material changes from those risk factors previously disclosed in Item 1A Risk Factors of Part I of the Corporation’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006.
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
(a) Sale of Unregistered Equity Securities
As previously disclosed, on December 1, 2004, the Corporation, through First Charter Bank, its primary banking subsidiary, acquired substantially all of the assets of Smith & Associates Insurance Services Inc., a property and casualty insurance agency (the “Agency”), pursuant to an Asset Purchase Agreement, dated as of the same date (the “Purchase Agreement”). No underwriters were used in connection with this transaction. In connection with this transaction, the Corporation has previously issued an aggregate of 42,198 shares of Common Stock valued at $1,112,000 to the Agency. On May 1, 2007, pursuant to the Purchase Agreement and based upon the performance of the business for the period December 1, 2005 through November 30, 2006 the Corporation issued 10,632 additional shares of Common Stock valued at $256,000. The issuance of the shares in connection with this transaction was exempt from the registration requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, in accordance with Section 4(2) thereof, as a transaction by an issuer not involving a public offering. The Purchase Agreement also contemplates one additional, subsequent issuance of Common Stock based upon the future performance of the acquired business. The Corporation presently expects the value of this future issuance, if earned, to total approximately $200,000.
(c) Issuer Repurchases of Equity Securities
The following table summarizes the Corporation’s repurchases of its common stock during the quarter ended June 30, 2007.
                                 
 
                    Total Number of   Maximum Number
                    Shares Purchased   of Shares
    Total Number   Average Price   as Part of   That May Yet be
    of Shares   Paid   Publicly-Announced   Purchased under
Period   Purchased   Per Share   Plans or Programs   the Plans or Programs
 
April 1, 2007 - April 30, 2007
                      1,625,400  
May 1, 2007 - May 31, 2007
    243,500       21.07       243,500       1,381,900  
June 1, 2007 - June 30, 2007
    256,500       21.25       256,500       1,125,400  
 
Total
    500,000       21.20       500,000       1,125,400  
 

59


Table of Contents

On January 23, 2002, the Corporation’s Board of Directors authorized a stock repurchase plan to acquire up to 1.5 million shares of the Corporation’s common stock from time to time. As of June 30, 2007, the Corporation had repurchased all shares under this authorization.
On October 24, 2003, the Corporation’s Board of Directors authorized a stock repurchase plan to acquire up to an additional 1.5 million shares of the Corporation’s common stock from time to time. As of June 30, 2007, the Corporation had repurchased 374,600 shares under this authorization.
There were 500,000 shares of the Corporation’s common stock repurchased during the three months ended June 30, 2007. The maximum number of shares that may yet be repurchased under the plans or programs was 1,125,400 at June 30, 2007. The October 24, 2003 stock repurchase authorization has no set expiration or termination date.
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities
Not applicable.
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
(a) First Charter Corporation’s Annual Meeting of Shareholders was held on May 23, 2007.
(c) The following are the voting results on each matter (exclusive of procedural matters) submitted to the shareholders:
1. To elect five directors to the Corporation’s Board of Directors with terms expiring in 2010 and one director with a term expiring in 2008.
                 
    For   Withheld
Terms expiring in 2010      
Jewell D. Hoover
    26,205,922       912,047  
Walter H. Jones, Jr
    22,155,428       4,962,541  
Samuel C. King, Jr.
    25,955,112       1,162,857  
Jerry E. McGee
    25,988,347       1,129,622  
John S. Poelker
    26,148,813       969,156  
 
               
Term expiring in 2008
               
Richard F. Combs
    26,337,344       780,625  
2. To ratify the action of the Corporation’s Audit Committee in appointing KPMG LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, as their auditor for 2007.
         
For
    26,269,777  
Against
    720,111  
Abstain
    128,081  
Broker Non-Votes
     
Item 5. Other Information
Not Applicable.

60


Table of Contents

Item 6. Exhibits
     
Exhibit No.   Description of Exhibits
 
10.1
  Transition Agreement, dated May 16, 2007, by and between the Registrant and Charles A. Caswell, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K, dated May 16, 2007
 
   
10.2
  Description of retention bonus compensation arrangement between the Registrant and Sheila A. Stoke, incorporated herein by reference to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K, dated May 16, 2007
 
   
12.1
  Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
 
   
31.1
  Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
 
   
31.2
  Certification of Principal Financial Officer Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
 
   
32.1
  Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
 
   
32.2
  Certification of Principal Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

61


Table of Contents

SIGNATURE
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
         
  FIRST CHARTER CORPORATION
(Registrant)
 
 
Date: August 8, 2007  By:   /s/ Sheila A. Stoke    
    Sheila A. Stoke   
    Senior Vice President, Corporate Controller (Principal Financial Officer duly authorized to sign on behalf of the Registrant)   
 

62