As filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on October 14, 2003
File No. 70- 9533
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
-------------------------------
POST-EFFECTIVE AMENDMENT NO. 6
TO
FORM U-1 APPLICATION-DECLARATION
UNDER
THE PUBLIC UTILITY HOLDING COMPANY ACT OF 1935
---------------------------------
SCANA CORPORATION PRIMESOUTH, INC.
SOUTH CAROLINA ELECTRIC & GAS COMPANY PALMARK, INC.
SOUTH CAROLINA GENERATING COMPANY, INC. SCANA RESOURCES, INC.
SOUTH CAROLINA FUEL COMPANY, INC. SCANA DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
SOUTH CAROLINA PIPELINE CORPORATION SCANA PETROLEUM RESOURCES, INC.
SCG PIPELINE, INC. SCANA SERVICES, INC.
SCANA ENERGY MARKETING, INC. PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF NORTH CAROLINA,
SCANA ENERGY TRADING, LLC INCORPORATED
SCANA PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY, LLC PSNC BLUE RIDGE CORPORATION
SCANA COMMUNICATIONS, INC. PSNC CARDINAL PIPELINE COMPANY
SERVICECARE, INC. CLEAN ENERGY ENTERPRISES INC.
1426 Main Street
Columbia, South Carolina 29201
(Name of company or companies filing this statement and address of
principal executive offices)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SCANA CORPORATION
(Name of top registered holding company parent of each applicant or declarant)
---------------------------------
Kevin B. Marsh
H. Thomas Arthur
SCANA CORPORATION
1426 Main Street
Columbia, South Carolina 29201
(Name and address of agent for service)
---------------------------------
The Commission is requested to send copies of all notices, orders and
communications in connection with this Application-Declaration to:
William J. Harmon
Michael G. Strohmeier
Jones Day
77 West Wacker, Suite 3500
Chicago, IL 60601
(312) 782-3939
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PAGE
Item 1. Description of Proposed Transaction....................................................................1
A. Background.....................................................................................1
B. Overview of the Requests.......................................................................2
C. Tax Allocation Agreement.......................................................................3
1. Overview of the Mergers...............................................................3
2. Acquisition Debt Issued in Mergers....................................................3
3. Proposed Tax Allocation Agreement.....................................................4
D. Payment of Dividends Out of Capital............................................................5
1. Existing Authorization................................................................5
2. Change in Accounting Principles.......................................................5
3. Request for Further Authority.........................................................5
E. Reports Under Rule 24..........................................................................6
Item 2. Fees, Commissions And Expenses.........................................................................6
Item 3. Applicable Statutory Provisions........................................................................6
A. Section 12(b)..................................................................................6
B. Section 12(c)..................................................................................8
C. Rule 54 Analysis...............................................................................9
Item 4. Regulatory Approval....................................................................................9
Item 5. Procedure..............................................................................................9
Item 6. Exhibits And Financial Statements.....................................................................10
A. Exhibits......................................................................................10
B. Financial Statements..........................................................................10
-i-
This Post-Effective Amendment No. 6 amends the Form U-1
Application-Declaration (the "Application") in File No. 70-9533, as previously
amended, to add the following:
ITEM 1. Description of Proposed Transaction
A. Background.
By order dated February 9, 2000 (the "Merger Order")(1), the Commission
authorized SCANA Corporation ("SCANA"), a South Carolina corporation, to acquire
all of the issued and outstanding common stock of Public Service Company of
North Carolina, Incorporated ("PSNC"), an exempt holding company. SCANA
registered as a holding company under the Act on February 11, 2000. SCANA now
owns directly all of the issued and outstanding common stock of three public
utility companies within the meaning of the Act, PSNC, South Carolina Electric &
Gas Company ("SCE&G"), which generates, transmits, distributes and sells
electricity and purchases and sells natural gas in South Carolina, and South
Carolina Generating Company, Inc. ("GENCO"), which owns and operates a 580 MW
generating facility in Goose Creek, South Carolina and sells all of the power
generated by the facility to SCE&G (PSNC, SCE&G and GENCO are collectively
referred to as the "Utility Subsidiaries"). SCANA, the Utility Subsidiaries and
the additional companies listed on the signature page of this Application are
collectively referred to as the "Applicants."
SCANA also holds directly all of the outstanding equity securities of
(1) SCANA Services, Inc. ("SCANA Services"), a subsidiary service company that
provides administrative, management and other services to subsidiaries and
business units within the SCANA system; (2) South Carolina Pipeline Corporation
("SCPC"), a subsidiary engaged in the purchase, transmission and sale of natural
gas to commercial, industrial and wholesale customers, including SCE (3)
South Carolina Fuel Company, Inc. ("SC Fuel"), which acquires, owns and provides
financing for SCE&G's nuclear fuel, fossil fuel and sulfur dioxide emission
allowances;(4) SCANA Energy Marketing, Inc. ("SCANA Marketing"), a subsidiary
that markets natural gas and wholesale electricity, primarily in the southeast
and provides energy-related risk management services to producers and customers;
(5) ServiceCare, Inc. ("ServiceCare"), a subsidiary that provides energy-related
products and service contracts on home appliances; (6) Primesouth, Inc., a
subsidiary engaged in power plant management and maintenance services; (7) SCANA
Resources, Inc., a subsidiary that conducts energy-related businesses and
provides energy-related services; and (8) SCG Pipeline, Inc. a subsidiary
organized to engage in the transportation of natural gas in Georgia and South
Carolina.
SCANA also owns all of the issued and outstanding stock of SCANA
Communications, Inc., an "exempt telecommunications company," as defined in
Section 34 of the Act, and subsidiary thereof that invests in telecommunications
companies. A complete description of SCANA's direct and indirect nonutility
subsidiaries is contained in SCANA's Annual Report on Form U-5S for the year
ended December 31, 2002, to which reference is made.
---------------------
(1) See Holding Co. Act Release No. 27133.
1
In connection with the Merger, the Commission issued an order dated
February 14, 2000, (as supplemented and amended, the "Prior Orders"),(2)
authorizing SCANA, the Utility Subsidiaries and the Non-Utility Subsidiaries to
engage, subject to certain limitations, in certain financing and related
activities. Authorization for these financing related activities (the "Financing
Activities") under the Prior Orders expired February 11, 2003.(3) Other
authorizations in the Prior Orders, including PSNC's ability to pay dividends
out of capital or unearned surplus were not subject to this expiration date.
The Commission reserved jurisdiction in the Prior Orders over a
proposal to allocate the consolidated income tax liability of SCANA among the
members of the consolidated group in a manner that would differ in one respect
from the method allowed under Rule 45(c) of the rules and regulations under the
Act.
Under the Prior Orders, the Commission approved the ability of PSNC to
pay dividends out of the additional paid-in-capital account up to the amount of
its aggregate retained earnings immediately prior to the Merger and out of
earnings before the amortization of the goodwill thereafter. The authorization
was granted to take into consideration the application of the purchase method of
accounting to the Merger that caused the retained earnings of PSNC prior to the
Merger to be recharacterized as additional paid-in-capital and the circumstance
that the Merger gave rise to a substantial level of goodwill, which was to be
"pushed-down" to PSNC and reflected as additional paid-in-capital after the
Merger, effectively leaving PSNC with no retained earnings, the traditional
source of dividend payments, but a strong balance sheet showing a significant
equity level.
B. Overview of the Requests
Applicants are now requesting that the Commission act on two
outstanding matters related to the Prior Orders. Applicants request that the
Commission:
- Release jurisdiction over the proposed Tax Allocation
Agreement described below. Applicants' request for approval of its Tax
Allocation Agreement is substantially similar to the facts and
circumstances underlying the request sought by other registered holding
companies with respect to their tax allocation agreements.(4)
---------------------
(2) See Holding Co. Act Release Nos. 27135 and 27137. In Holding Co.
Act Release No. 27341 (Jan. 31, 2001) and Holding Co. Act Release No. 27476
(Dec. 19, 2001) the Commission issued supplemental orders increasing various
financing limitations throughout the authorization period.
(3) New financing authorization was granted in Holding Co. Act release
No. 27649 (February 12, 2003) (the "Current Financing Order").
(4) FirstEnergy Corp., Holding Co. Act Release No. 27694 (June 30,
2003) (Authorizing FirstEnergy to retain the benefit that is attributable to the
interest expense on the acquisition debt, rather than reallocate that tax
savings to its subsidiary companies); Energy East Corporation, Holding Co. Act
Release No. 27643 (January 28, 2003) (Authorizing Energy East to retain the
benefit that is attributable to the interest expense associated with the
debentures issued to help finance the cash portion of the consideration paid in
the RGS merger, and the unsecured debt issued to help finance the cash portions
of the consideration in the Energy East merger); and Pepco Holdings Inc.,
Holding Co. Act Release No. 27553 (July 24, 2002) (Authorizing a tax allocation
agreement that provides for the retention by Pepco Holdings Inc. of payments for
tax losses that it will incur in connection with financing or refinancing
approximately $700 million of the cash consideration to be paid in the
acquisition of Pepco and
2
- Grant PSNC authorization to pay dividends out of capital or
unearned surplus, before taking into consideration any amortization of
intangibles recognized as a result of the Merger, and any impairment of
either goodwill or other intangibles recognized as a result of the
Merger.
C. Tax Allocation Agreement
1. Overview of the Mergers.
Pursuant to an Amended and Restated Agreement and Plan of Merger (the
"Merger Agreement"), dated as of February 16, 1999 and amended and restated as
of May 10, 1999 by and among PSNC, SCANA, New Sub I, Inc., a South Carolina
corporation and a wholly owned subsidiary company of SCANA ("New Sub I"), and
New Sub II, Inc., a South Carolina corporation and a wholly owned subsidiary
company of SCANA ("New Sub II"), New Sub I was merged with and into SCANA with
SCANA as the surviving corporation (the "First Merger"), and PSNC was merged
with and into New Sub II with New Sub II as the surviving corporation (the
"Second Merger", and together with the First Merger, the "Mergers"). Pursuant to
the Mergers, PSNC became a wholly owned subsidiary company of SCANA. The total
cash paid in the Merger was $700 million, further described below.
In the First Merger, each share of SCANA common stock outstanding
immediately prior to the effective time of the First Merger was converted into
the right to receive either (i) $30 in cash or (ii) one share of SCANA common
stock. The aggregate cash consideration paid by SCANA in the First Merger was
$488 million. This cash payment effectively resulted in the repurchase and
retirement of approximately 16.3 million shares of SCANA common stock.
In the Second Merger, each share of PSNC common stock outstanding
immediately prior to the effective time of the Second Merger was converted into
the right to receive either (i) $33.00 in cash or (ii) a number of shares of
SCANA common stock equal to the PSNC exchange ratio. The aggregate cash
consideration paid by SCANA in the Second Merger was $212 million.
2. Acquisition Debt Issued in Mergers.
SCANA financed the cash portion of the consideration paid in the
Mergers and other expenses associated with the Mergers by issuing $400 million
of two-year floating rate notes and borrowing $300 million for a three-year term
under a credit agreement with several banks. These notes and borrowings
subsequently were refinanced by issuing medium term notes of various maturities
and interest rates totaling an aggregate of $700 million. As of June 30, 2003
such debt consisted of $300 million of 6.875% medium term notes due 2011, $250
million of 6.25% medium term notes due 2012 and $150 million of floating rate
medium term notes due 2004. As used in this Post-Effective Amendment and in the
proposed Tax Allocation
---------------------
(continued...)
Conectiv), Progress Energy, Inc., Holding Co. Act Release No. 27522 (April 18,
2002) (collectively, the ("Acquisition Debt Orders").
3
Agreement, the term "Acquisition Debt" means indebtedness incurred by SCANA to
finance the Mergers, and any renewals or extensions thereof and any refinancings
or refundings thereof.
SCANA's interest expense on the Acquisition Debt for 2000, 2001 and
2002 was approximately $45.1 million, $33.9 million and $25.8 million,
respectively. Because SCANA and its consolidated subsidiaries file a
consolidated income tax return, the interest expense on the Acquisition Debt
will offset the group's consolidated taxable income and therefore reduce the
overall tax liability of the group. Applying a hypothetical 38 1/4% composite
federal and state tax rate to the actual or estimated consolidated taxable
income of the group, the interest expense on the Acquisition Debt reduced the
group's tax liability by $17.25 million in 2000, $12.97 million in 2001 and by
$9.87 million in 2002. Under the existing tax allocation agreement of the SCANA
group, SCANA was not able to retain, or share in, this tax benefit. In addition,
as discussed below, unless the relief requested in this Post-Effective Amendment
is granted, SCANA will not be able to retain, or share in, the tax benefit
(i.e., the reduction in the group's income tax liability) that is associated
with the interest it pays on the Acquisition Debt in future years. Rather, under
Rule 45(c), the benefit of the interest expense is allocated to other members of
the group with a positive corporate tax (primarily SCE&G and PNSC).
3. Proposed Tax Allocation Agreement.
The Applicants request that the Commission authorize SCANA and its
subsidiaries to allocate the consolidated income tax liability of the group in
accordance with the Tax Allocation Agreement that is filed herewith as Exhibit
B-5 (Rev) for the period through April 15, 2006, as such period may be extended
by any subsequent order or orders. Under the proposed Tax Allocation Agreement,
the consolidated tax would be allocated among the members of the group in
proportion to the separate return tax of each member, provided that the tax
apportioned to any subsidiary company of SCANA will not exceed the "separate
return tax" of such subsidiary.(5) This is the method of allocation permitted
under Rule 45(c)(2)(ii).
The agreement further provides that SCANA will retain the benefit (in
the form of the reduction in consolidated tax) that is attributable to the
interest expense on the Acquisition Debt, rather than reallocate that tax
savings to its subsidiary companies, as would be required by Rule 45(c)(5). In
this respect, the proposed Tax Allocation Agreement does not comply with all of
the requirements of Rule 45(c). The proposed Tax Allocation Agreement will have
the effect of assigning the tax benefit associated with the interest expense on
the Acquisition Debt to the entity that is legally obligated for its payment -
SCANA. At the same time, in accordance with Rule 45(c)(2), the portion of the
consolidated tax allocated to any of SCANA's subsidiaries will not exceed the
"separate return tax" of such subsidiary (the "separate return limitation").
Thus, the proposed Tax Allocation Agreement will not have the effect of shifting
a larger portion of the group's tax liability to any member than it would
otherwise pay on a separate return basis. Exhibit K-1 illustrates the difference
between the Rule 45(c) method and the proposed method in the amounts of tax that
would be allocated to the members of the SCANA group.
---------------------
(5) Under Rule 45(c), the "separate return tax" is defined to mean "the
tax on the corporate taxable income of an associate company computed as though
such company were not a member of a consolidated group."
4
The Applicants will file a new application/declaration in order to
extend the period in which they may allocate consolidated income taxes in
accordance with the Tax Allocation Agreement past April 15, 2006. Such
application/declaration will include, among other things, information on the
actual and pro forma effect of the proposed tax allocation method on the
capitalization and cash flow of the members of the SCANA group for the period
covered by any such requested extension.
D. Payment of Dividends Out of Capital
1. Existing Authorization.
As stated above, in connection with the Merger that resulted in SCANA
becoming a registered holding company, SCANA obtained Commission approval for
PSNC to pay dividends (i) out of the additional paid-in-capital account up to
the amount of its aggregate retained earnings immediately prior to the Merger
and (ii) out of earnings before the amortization of the goodwill thereafter.(6)
2. Change in Accounting Principles.
Subsequent to the Merger, Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
("SFAS") 141, "Business Combinations," and SFAS 142, "Goodwill and Other
Intangible Assets," were issued in 2001. SFAS 142 eliminated the amortization of
goodwill as was required previously and provides for an annual assessment to
determine if goodwill amounts are impaired. If an analysis discloses an
impairment, the company must take an impairment charge. SCANA did such an
analysis as of January 1, 2002, which resulted in an impairment charge relating
to PSNC of $230 million.
3. Request for Further Authority.
Applicants request that PSNC be authorized to pay dividends out of
earnings before any amortization of intangibles as a result of the Merger, and
before any deductions resulting from any impairment of either goodwill or other
intangibles recognized as a result of the Merger.
In accordance with the further authorization sought herein, PSNC will
be authorized to pay dividends as follows:
(in millions)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Retained earnings prior to Merger $ 72
Net earnings 2000-2001 43
Amortization of goodwill 2000-2001 26
Dividends paid 2000-2001 34
GAAP Retained earnings 12/31/01 9
Available for dividends in 2002 (including out of capital -- "old"
retained earnings $73, amortization $26, GAAP retained earnings $9)
107
---------------------
(6) See the Prior Orders.
5
20
Dividends in 2002
Net earnings in 2002 (including effects of impairment charge)
(207)
Amount available for future dividends (unused amount authorized out
of capital - $108 less 2002 dividend - $20 plus 2002 net income
before impairment - $23) $110
PSNC's common equity percentage at September 30, 2002 according to
generally accepted accounting principles ("GAAP") was 70.5%. PSNC's common
equity percentage at December 31, 2002 was 60%, taking into consideration the
reduction in equity resulting from the goodwill impairment charge. If all of the
goodwill associated with the acquisition of PSNC by SCANA were found to be
impaired, the pro forma common equity of PSNC at December 31, 2002, would be
46%. PSNC has authority to issue $600 million of additional debt under the
Current Financing Order. PSNC's common equity, assuming all $600 million were
issued, and taking into account the 2002 impairment charge, would be 34.5%
(based on PSNC's balance sheet as of December 31, 2002).
SCANA believes that based on anticipated earnings and dividend levels,
as well as estimated financing, that PSNC will not have common equity below 30%
over the next several years. SCANA believes it can manage PSNC's common equity
and maintain it at least at a 30% level (through control of debt and dividend
levels) even if it were to incur additional goodwill impairment charges.
E. Reports Under Rule 24.
The Applicants will supplement the quarterly report under Rule 24 filed
in this proceeding for the quarterly period in which they file their
consolidated federal income tax return with information showing the calculation
of the portion of SCANA's loss that is attributable to interest expense on the
Acquisition Debt and a spreadsheet showing the actual allocation of income taxes
to each of the members of the consolidated group.
ITEM 2. FEES, COMMISSIONS AND EXPENSES.
The fees, commissions and expenses paid or incurred or to be incurred
in connection with this Post-Effective Amendment are estimated at not more than
$25,000.
ITEM 3. APPLICABLE STATUTORY PROVISIONS.
A. Section 12(b).
Provisions in a tax allocation agreement between a registered holding
company and its subsidiaries are subject to Section 12(b) of the Act and Rule 45
thereunder. Rule 45(a) of the Act generally prohibits any registered holding
company or subsidiary company from, directly or indirectly, lending or in any
manner extending its credit to or indemnifying, or making any donation or
capital contribution to, any company in the same holding company system, except
pursuant to a Commission order. Rule 45(c) provides, however, that approval
under Rule 45(a)
6
is not required for the filing of a consolidated tax return pursuant to a tax
allocation agreement between eligible associate companies in a registered
holding company system that complies with the terms of the Rule 45(c). However,
if a tax allocation agreement does not comply in all respects with the
provisions of Rule 45(c), it may nonetheless be approved by the Commission under
Section 12(b) and Rule 45(a).(7)
The Commission has previously approved a tax allocation methodology
that does not comply with Rule 45(c) because it allows the registered holding
company to retain tax benefits on indebtedness incurred in a merger
transaction.(8) Applicants maintain that the proposed Tax Allocation Agreement
is substantially the same as that approved in the Acquisition Debt Orders and
that there are no other facts or circumstances in this case which would warrant
a contrary result. In particular, consistent with the Acquisition Debt Orders,
the Tax Allocation Agreement proposed by SCANA:
1. assigns the tax benefit of the interest expense on the
Acquisition Debt to SCANA, the company that is legally
obligated for the payment of that interest expense;
2. will not lead to the types of abuse that Section 12 is
intended to prevent;
3. will preserve the "separate return" limitation that assures
that the Utility Subsidiaries tax liabilities will not be
higher than they otherwise would have been; and
4. will not shift to any member of SCANA's group any larger
portion of the group's overall tax liability than such member
would otherwise pay on a separate return basis.
As was the case in the Acquisition Debt Orders, the Acquisition Debt
here was not incurred to fund investments in SCANA's other subsidiaries, but
instead incurred in connection with the Mergers. The Acquisition Debt represents
indebtedness of SCANA. Importantly, SCANA could not, without the approval of the
commissions having jurisdiction over rates of the Utility Subsidiaries, recover
in rates of the Utility Subsidiaries any costs, including the interest on the
Acquisition Debt, associated with the Mergers. As the Commission stated in the
Energy East order,(9) where the registered holding company's subsidiaries have
not assumed any legal
---------------------
(7) See the Progress Order and the Acquisition Debt Orders.
(8) See the Acquisition Debt Orders. Similarly, in The National Grid
Group plc, Holding Co. Act Release No. 27154 (March 15, 2000) (the "National
Grid Order"), the Commission authorized National Grid Group and its subsidiaries
to enter into a tax allocation agreement under which the tax benefit of the
interest expense on acquisition debt would be allocated to the U.S. sub-holding
company of National Grid Group that had incurred the debt. Except for the
specific interplay between foreign and U.S. tax laws, SCANA's circumstances are
essentially the same as presented by National Grid. In approving the proposed
tax allocation agreement of National Grid, the Commission observed that the
agreement would not lead to the abuses that section 12 is intended to prevent
and that the 'separate return' limitation will assure that the NEES' utility
subsidiaries tax liability will not be higher than it otherwise would have been.
The Commission further concluded that "because the NEES Group has no obligation
with respect to the Merger-Related Debt and the debt does not affect the NEES
Group's financial position or credit, it is not inappropriate to exclude these
companies from the benefits of the tax consequences arising out of the debt."
(9) See Energy East Corporation, Holding Co. Act Release No. 27643
(January 28, 2003).
7
obligation for the Acquisition Debt, as is the case here, it is not detrimental
to SCANA's subsidiaries or to consumers if SCANA retains the benefit associated
with its interest expense. Moreover, the Acquisition Debt is and will remain
unsecured. Thus, the lenders will not have any call on the assets of SCANA's
subsidiaries or any security interest in the common stock of the subsidiaries
that is held by SCANA.
Although SCANA's subsidiaries do not have any legal obligation for the
Acquisition Debt, SCANA's ability to pay interest on the Acquisition Debt, as
well as to pay common dividends, is largely dependent upon its receipt of
dividends from subsidiaries (primarily SCE&G and PSNC, its largest
subsidiaries). Currently, SCANA is not projecting any change in its dividend
policy. Exhibit K-2 lays out the dividend payout ratio of SCE&G and PSNC in 2000
through 2002. Dividends will be paid from current and retained earnings of the
Utility Subsidiaries, as allowed by Rule 46, except as otherwise may be allowed
by the Commission with respect to PSNC as described herein.(10)
Finally, because the amount of tax allocated to the Utility
Subsidiaries will remain subject to the separate return limitation, the Tax
Allocation Agreement will have no impact on the rates or revenue requirements of
the Utility Subsidiaries. A basic premise of regulation followed by the state
commissions that regulate the Utility Subsidiaries is that utility operations
should not subsidize other operations nor should they be subsidized by other
operations. Income taxes are, therefore, calculated on a standalone basis for
jurisdictional ratemaking.
B. Section 12(c)
Section 12(c) of the Act and Rule 46 thereunder prohibit a registered
holding company or subsidiary thereof to declare or pay dividends out of capital
or unearned surplus absent an order by the Commission. Under the Prior Order,
PSNC has authority to pay dividends out of the additional paid-in-capital
account up to the amount of its aggregate retained earnings immediately prior to
the Merger and out of earnings before the amortization of the goodwill
thereafter. Applicants request additional authority taking into consideration
the adoption of SFAS 142. PSNC seeks authority to pay dividends out of earnings
before any amortization of intangibles as a result of the Merger, and before any
deductions resulting from any impairment of either goodwill or other intangibles
recognized as a result of the Merger.
The Commission has granted this relief before. Energy East Corporation
was authorized to pay dividends out of capital to the extent of retained
earnings of its merger partner prior to the merger plus amortization of
goodwill.(11) After SFAS 142 was adopted, the Commission stated:
In the Financing Order, the Commission authorized the
companies Energy East previously acquired to pay dividends out
of earnings before amortization of goodwill. Because goodwill
and certain intangible assets recognized as a result of the
RGS'
---------------------
(10) Under the Prior Order, SCANA has authority to cause PSNC to pay
dividends out of the additional paid-in-capital account up to the amount of its
aggregate retained earnings immediately prior to the Merger and out of earnings
before the amortization of the goodwill thereafter.
(11) Energy East Corporation, Holding Co. Act Release No. 27643 (Jan.
28, 2003) referring to Energy East Corporation, Holding Co. Act Release No.
27288 (Sept. 12, 2000).
8
Merger with Energy East are not amortized, any decrease in the
value of those assets is recognized as an impairment instead
of amortization expense. Therefore, RGS is requesting
authorization to pay dividends out of earnings before any
impairment of goodwill and any impairment or amortization of
intangible assets recognized as a result of the Merger.
SCANA is seeking the same additional authority for PSNC: to pay
dividends out of capital or unearned surplus based on substantially similar
circumstances underlying the authority granted to Energy East. As stated above,
SCANA believes that based on anticipated earnings and dividend levels, as well
as estimated financing, that PSNC will not have common equity below 30% over the
next several years. SCANA believes it can manage PSNC's common equity and
maintain it at least at a 30% level (through control of debt and dividend
levels) even if it were to incur additional goodwill impairment charges.
C. Rule 54 Analysis.
The proposed transaction is also subject to Rule 54, which refers to
Rule 53. Rule 54 under the Act provides that in determining whether to approve
certain transactions other than those involving exempt wholesale generators
("EWGs") or foreign utility companies ("FUCOs"), as defined in the Act, the
Commission will not consider the effect of the capitalization or earnings of any
subsidiary which is an EWG or FUCO if Rule 53(a), (b) and (c) under the Act are
satisfied. Neither SCANA nor any of its subsidiaries presently has, or as a
consequence of the proposed transaction will have, an interest in any EWG or
FUCO. Consequently, all applicable requirements of Rule 53 (a) - (c) under the
Act are satisfied as required by Rule 54 under the Act.
ITEM 4. REGULATORY APPROVAL.
No state commission and no federal commission, other than the
Commission, has direct jurisdiction over the proposed Tax Allocation Agreement
or dividend payments.
ITEM 5. PROCEDURE.
The Applicants request that the Commission's supplemental order
releasing jurisdiction be issued as soon as the rules allow, and that there not
be a 30-day waiting period between issuance of the Commission's supplemental
order and the date on which the order is to become effective. The Applicants
hereby waive a recommended decision by a hearing officer or any other
responsible officer of the Commission and consent that the Division of
Investment Management may assist in the preparation of the Commission's decision
and/or order, unless the Division opposes the matters proposed herein.
ITEM 6. EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
A. Exhibits.
B-5 Form of Tax Allocation Agreement (Revised) (Filed
herewith).
9
K-1 Comparison of Allocation of Federal Income Tax
Liability under Tax Allocation Agreement and Rule
45(c). (Filed herewith)
K-2 Calculation of Dividend Payout Ratio of SCANA, SCE&G
and PSNC for the Years 2000 - 2002. (Filed
confidentially pursuant to Rule 104 under Form SE).
B. Financial Statements.
FS-1 Consolidated Balance Sheet of SCANA Corporation as of
December 31, 2002 (Incorporated by reference to the
filing of SCANA Corporation on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 2002)
FS-2 Consolidated Statement of Operations of SCANA
Corporation for the year ended December 31, 2002
(Incorporated by reference to the filing of SCANA
Corporation on Form 10-K for the year ended December
31, 2002)
FS-3 Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet of SCANA
Corporation as of June 30, 2003 (Incorporated by
reference to the filing of SCANA Corporation on Form
10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2003)
FS-2 Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations of
SCANA Corporation for the period ended December 31,
2002 (Incorporated by reference to the filing of
SCANA Corporation on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
June 30, 2003)
10
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Public Utility Holding Company Act
of 1935, each of the undersigned companies has duly caused this Post-Effective
Amendment to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly
authorized.
SCANA CORPORATION
By /s/ H. Thomas Arthur
------------------------------------
Name: H. Thomas Arthur
Title: Senior Vice President and
General Counsel
SOUTH CAROLINA ELECTRIC & GAS COMPANY
SOUTH CAROLINA GENERATING COMPANY, INC.
SOUTH CAROLINA FUEL COMPANY, INC.
SOUTH CAROLINA PIPELINE CORPORATION
SCG PIPELINE, INC.
SCANA ENERGY MARKETING, INC.
SCANA ENERGY TRADING, LLC
SCANA PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY, LLC
SCANA COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
SERVICECARE, INC.
PRIMESOUTH, INC.
PALMARK, INC.
SCANA RESOURCES, INC.
SCANA DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
SCANA PETROLEUM RESOURCES, INC.
SCANA SERVICES, INC.
PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF NORTH
CAROLINA, INCORPORATED
PSNC BLUE RIDGE CORPORATION
PSNC CARDINAL PIPELINE COMPANY, LLC
CLEAN ENERGY ENTERPRISES INC.
By: SCANA CORPORATION
By /s/ H. Thomas Arthur
------------------------------------
Name: H. Thomas Arthur
Title: Senior Vice President and
General Counsel
Date: October 14, 2003
11