def14a
SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION
Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (Amendment No. )
Filed by the Registrant þ
Filed by a Party other than the Registrant o
Check the appropriate box:
o Preliminary Proxy Statement
o Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))
þ Definitive Proxy Statement
o Definitive Additional Materials
o Soliciting Material Pursuant to §240.14a-12
NII HOLDINGS, INC.
(Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)
Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):
þ No fee required.
o Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11.
(1) Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:
(2) Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:
(3) Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act
Rule 0-11 (Set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was
determined):
(4) Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:
(5) Total fee paid:
o Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.
o Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule
0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the
previous filing by registration statement number, or the form or schedule and the date of its
filing.
(1) Amount Previously Paid:
(2) Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:
(3) Filing Party:
(4) Date Filed:
ANNUAL
MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
April 10,
2008
Dear Stockholder:
You are cordially invited to attend the 2008 Annual Meeting of
Stockholders of NII Holdings, Inc., which is to be held on
May 14, 2008 at 10:00 a.m. local time at the Hyatt
Regency Reston, located at 1800 Presidents Street, Reston, VA
20190
(703-709-1234).
At the Annual Meeting, you will be asked to elect three
directors to serve three-year terms and to ratify the
appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as our independent
registered public accounting firm for fiscal year 2008.
Whether or not you plan to attend, it is important that your
shares be represented and voted at the Annual Meeting. You can
vote by signing, dating, and returning the enclosed proxy card.
Also, eligible stockholders may vote by telephone or over the
Internet. Instructions for using these convenient services are
set forth in the instructions for voting that are attached to
the enclosed proxy card or voting instruction. Beneficial owners
of shares of our common stock held in street name should follow
the enclosed instructions for voting their shares. I hope you
will be able to attend the Annual Meeting, but even if you
cannot, please vote your shares as promptly as possible.
Sincerely,
Steven M. Shindler
Chairman of the Board of Directors
NII
Holdings, Inc.
1875 Explorer Street, 10th Floor
Reston, VA 20190
www.nii.com
NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF
STOCKHOLDERS
MAY 14, 2008
We will hold the Annual Meeting of Stockholders of NII Holdings,
Inc. (the Company or NII Holdings) on
May 14, 2008, at 10:00 a.m. local time at the Hyatt
Regency Reston, located at 1800 Presidents Street, Reston, VA
20190
(703-709-1234).
The purpose of the Annual Meeting is to consider and take
action on the following:
1. Election of three directors, Neal P. Goldman, Charles M.
Herington and John W. Risner, each for a three-year term ending
2011;
2. Ratification of the appointment of
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as the Companys independent
registered public accounting firm for fiscal year 2008; and
3. Any other business that properly comes before the Annual
Meeting and any adjournments thereof.
The Board of Directors recommends that you vote FOR the
three nominees for director and FOR the ratification of
the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as the
Companys independent registered public accounting firm.
Only stockholders of record as of April 4, 2008 can vote at
the Annual Meeting.
By Order of the Board of Directors,
Steven M. Shindler
Chairman of the Board of Directors
April 10, 2008
IMPORTANT
NOTICE REGARDING THE AVAILABILITY OF PROXY MATERIALS
FOR THE SHAREHOLDER MEETING TO BE HELD ON MAY 14,
2008.
The proxy statement and the Companys 2007 annual report on
Form 10-K
are available at www.edocumentview.com/nihd.
TABLE OF
CONTENTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page
|
|
General Information About Proxies and Voting
|
|
|
3
|
|
Proposal I Election of Directors
|
|
|
5
|
|
Governance of the Company
|
|
|
6
|
|
Executive Compensation
|
|
|
11
|
|
Director Compensation
|
|
|
34
|
|
Securities Ownership
|
|
|
36
|
|
Certain Relationships and Related Transactions
|
|
|
37
|
|
Audit Information
|
|
|
38
|
|
Proposal II Ratification of Appointment of
Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
|
|
|
40
|
|
Stockholder Proposals For 2009 Annual Meeting
|
|
|
40
|
|
Important Information
|
|
|
40
|
|
2
GENERAL
INFORMATION ABOUT PROXIES AND VOTING
Date,
Time and Place
These proxy materials are delivered in connection with the
solicitation by our board of directors of proxies to be voted at
our annual meeting, which is to be held at the Hyatt Regency
Reston, located at 1800 Presidents Street, Reston, VA 20190 at
10:00 a.m. local time on Wednesday May 14, 2008 (the
Annual Meeting). On or about April 10, 2008, we
commenced mailing this proxy statement and the enclosed form of
proxy to our stockholders entitled to vote at the meeting.
Purpose
of the Annual Meeting
At the annual meeting, stockholders will be asked to:
|
|
|
|
|
elect three directors to serve for a term of three years
(Item 1 on the proxy card);
|
|
|
|
ratify the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as our
independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal year
2008 (Item 2 on the proxy card); and
|
|
|
|
take action on any other business that properly comes before the
meeting and any adjournment or postponement of the meeting.
|
Solicitation,
Use and Revocation of Proxies
Our Board of Directors solicits the accompanying proxy for use
at the Annual Meeting. Giving your proxy means that you
authorize the persons indicated on the proxy card to vote your
shares at the Annual Meeting in the manner you direct. If you
sign, date and return the enclosed proxy card but do not specify
how to vote, your shares will be voted (1) for the election
of the nominees designated below to serve for three-year terms
ending 2011, (2) for ratification of the appointment of
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as the Companys independent
registered public accounting firm for fiscal year 2008 and
(3) at the discretion of the persons indicated on the proxy
card, on all other matters that may properly come before the
Annual Meeting or any adjournments thereof. A stockholder has
the power to revoke his or her proxy or change his or her vote
at any time before the proxy is voted at the Annual Meeting. You
can revoke your proxy or change your vote in one of four ways:
|
|
|
|
|
you can send a signed written notice of revocation to our
corporate secretary (at the address noted below) to revoke your
proxy;
|
|
|
|
you can send a completed proxy card bearing a later date than
your original proxy to us indicating the change in your
vote; or
|
|
|
|
you can attend the Annual Meeting and vote in person, which will
automatically cancel any proxy previously given, or
|
|
|
|
you can revoke your proxy in person at the Annual Meeting, but
attendance at the Annual Meeting alone will not revoke any proxy
that you have given previously.
|
If you choose any of the first two methods, you must take the
described action no later than the beginning of the Annual
Meeting. If you choose the third or fourth methods, you may be
asked to present documents for the purpose of establishing your
identity as a NII Holdings stockholder. Before the Annual
Meeting, any written notice of revocation should be sent to NII
Holdings, Inc., 1875 Explorer Street, 10th Floor, Reston,
Virginia 20190, Attention: Vice President, General Counsel and
Secretary. Any notice of revocation that is delivered at the
Annual Meeting should be hand delivered to our Vice President,
General Counsel and Secretary before a vote is taken. Once
voting on a particular matter is completed at the Annual
Meeting, you will not be able to revoke your proxy or change
your vote as to that matter. If your shares are held in street
name by a broker, bank or other financial institution, you must
contact that institution to change your vote.
Stockholders whose shares are registered in the name of a bank
or brokerage firm may be eligible to vote through the Internet
or by telephone. The enclosed proxy card provides instructions
for eligible stockholders. Stockholders who do not own shares
through a broker and stockholders who own shares through a
broker, but whose
3
proxy card does not mention information about Internet or
telephone voting, should complete the enclosed paper proxy card
and return it in the enclosed postage-paid envelope. Signing and
returning the proxy card or submitting the proxy via the
Internet or by telephone does not affect your right to revoke
your proxy or to vote in person at the Annual Meeting.
The cost of soliciting proxies for the Annual Meeting will be
borne by us. We have hired Georgeson Inc. to help us send out
the proxy materials and solicit proxies on behalf of the Board
of Directors. Georgesons fee for this service is $7,000
plus expenses. In addition, certain of our officers and regular
employees, without additional compensation, may use their
personal efforts, by telephone or otherwise, to obtain proxies.
We may also reimburse banks, brokerage firms and other
custodians, nominees and fiduciaries for their reasonable
out-of-pocket expenses in forwarding proxy materials to the
beneficial owners of shares of common stock.
Every stockholders vote is important. Accordingly, you
should sign, date and return the enclosed proxy card, vote via
the Internet or by telephone, or provide instructions to your
broker or other nominee whether or not you plan to attend the
Annual Meeting in person.
Record
Date, Voting Rights and Outstanding Shares
Our Board of Directors has established the close of business on
April 4, 2008, as the record date for determining
stockholders entitled to receive notice of and to vote on
proposals at the Annual Meeting or any adjournment or
postponement of the Annual Meeting. Only holders of record of
our common stock on the record date are entitled to vote at the
Annual Meeting. Holders of common stock on the record date are
entitled to one vote per share on each matter voted upon at the
Annual Meeting. As of the record date, there were
167,191,417 shares of common stock outstanding. A complete
list of stockholders entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting will
be available for examination at the time and place of the Annual
Meeting.
Quorum,
Voting Requirements and Effect of Abstentions and Broker
Non-Votes
A quorum is necessary for the transaction of business at the
Annual Meeting. A quorum exists when holders of a majority of
the total number of issued and outstanding shares of common
stock that are entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting are
present in person or by proxy. At the Annual Meeting, inspectors
of election will determine the presence of a quorum and tabulate
the results of the voting by stockholders. The inspectors will
treat valid proxies marked abstain or proxies
required to be treated as broker non-votes as
present for purposes of determining whether there is a quorum at
the Annual Meeting. A broker non-vote occurs when a
broker or nominee holding shares for a beneficial owner votes on
one proposal, but does not vote on another proposal because the
broker or nominee does not have discretionary voting power and
has not received instructions from the beneficial owner of the
shares. Abstentions with respect to any matter will have the
same effect as a vote against that proposal.
A plurality of the votes of the holders of the common stock
present at the Annual Meeting, in person or represented by
proxy, and entitled to vote on the election of directors, is
required for the election of directors. This means that the
nominees for director who receive the greatest number of votes
cast will be elected. All other matters will require the
approval of a majority of the votes of the record holders
present at the meeting, in person or represented by proxy, and
entitled to vote on such matters.
Management and the Board of Directors are not aware of any
matters to be presented for action at the Annual Meeting other
than the matters stated in the Notice of Annual Meeting of
Stockholders. If any such matter requiring a vote of the
stockholders should properly come before the Annual Meeting,
unless otherwise instructed, it is the intention of the persons
named in the proxy card to vote such proxy in accordance with
their best judgment.
4
PROPOSAL I
ELECTION
OF DIRECTORS
General
Our Second Amended and Restated Bylaws set our Board of
Directors at nine members divided into three classes in
accordance with our Certificate of Incorporation, with each
class having three directors. In connection with the resignation
of John M. Donovan from our Board on March 19, 2008, our
Board of Directors took action under our Second Amended and
Restated Bylaws to reduce the number of Board members from nine
to eight with two classes having three directors and one class
(the directors who hold office until 2010) having two
directors. The three-year terms of each class are staggered so
that the term of one class expires at each Annual Meeting. The
Board of Directors, upon the recommendation of the Nominating
Committee, has nominated Neal P. Goldman, Charles M. Herington
and John W. Risner, each of whom is an incumbent director, for
reelection to the board for three-year terms ending 2011.
If any nominee is unable to serve as a director, the persons
named in the enclosed proxy reserve the right to vote for a
lesser number of directors or for a substitute nominee
designated by our Board of Directors, to the extent consistent
with our Restated Certificate of Incorporation and our Second
Amended and Restated Bylaws. All of the nominees listed above
have consented to be nominated and to serve if elected. We do
not expect that any nominee will be unable to serve.
Directors
Standing for Reelection To Hold Office Until
2011
Neal P. Goldman, (38), has served as a director on the
board of NII Holdings since 2002. Mr. Goldman joined
Brigade Capital Management LLC as a partner in January 2007.
From 2001 to June 2006, Mr. Goldman was a managing director
in the High Yield Division of MacKay Shields LLC. Prior to
joining MacKay Shields LLC, he was a principal in the Special
Situations Group of Banc of America Securities from 1999 to
2001. He was previously with Salomon Smith Barney, an investment
bank, from 1995 to 1999 where he last served as a vice president
on the High Yield Trading Desk. Mr. Goldman also serves as
a director on the board of Catalyst Paper Corporation.
Charles M. Herington, (48), has served as a director on
the board of NII Holdings since 2003. He has been Executive Vice
President, Latin America of Avon Products, Inc., a global beauty
company, since March 2008 and was Senior Vice President, Latin
America of Avon Products, Inc. from March 2006 until March 2008.
From 1999 to February 2006, he was the president and chief
executive officer of AOL Latin America. From 1997 until 1999, he
served as president of Revlon America Latina. From 1990 through
1997, he held a variety of executive positions with PepsiCo
Restaurants International. Mr. Herington is on the board of
directors of Molson Coors Brewing Company (formerly Adolph Coors
Company).
John W. Risner, (48), has served as a director on the
board of NII Holdings since 2002. He is currently the President
of The Childrens Tumor Foundation, which he joined in
2004. From 1997 to 2002, he served as senior vice
president portfolio manager at AIG/SunAmerica Asset
Management, a money management firm. Prior to that,
Mr. Risner was vice president-senior portfolio manager at
Value Line Asset Management, a money management firm, where he
worked from 1991 to 1997.
Our Board of Directors recommends that the holders of
common stock vote FOR incumbent directors Neal P.
Goldman, Charles M. Herington and John W. Risner.
Directors
Not Standing for Reelection To Hold Office Until
2010
Steven P. Dussek, (51), has been a director on the board
of NII Holdings since 1999 and our chief executive officer since
February 2008. Mr. Dussek served as president and chief
executive officer of Dobson Communications Corporation, a
publicly traded wireless telecommunication company, from April
2005 until AT&T acquired Dobson in November 2007. While NII
Holdings was a subsidiary of Nextel Communications, Inc.,
Mr. Dussek served as its chief executive officer and chief
operating officer from 1999 until 2000 and as president and
chief operating officer from March 1999 until September 1999.
From 1996 until 2002, Mr. Dussek also served in various
senior management positions with Nextel Communications,
including as executive vice president and chief operating
officer. From 1995 to 1996, Mr. Dussek served as vice
president and general manager of the northeast region for the
5
PCS division of AT&T Wireless Services. From 1993 to 1995,
Mr. Dussek served as a senior vice president and chief
operating officer of Paging Networks, Inc., a paging company.
Steven M. Shindler, (45), has been a director on the
board of NII Holdings since 1997, chairman of the board since
2002 and executive chairman since February 2008.
Mr. Shindler served as our chief executive officer from
2000 until February 2008. Mr. Shindler also served as
executive vice president and chief financial officer of Nextel
Communications from 1996 until 2000. From 1987 to 1996,
Mr. Shindler was an officer with Toronto Dominion Bank, a
bank where he was a managing director in its communications
finance group.
Directors
Not Standing for Reelection To Hold Office Until
2009
Carolyn Katz, (46), has served as a director on the board
of NII Holdings since 2002. Ms. Katz was a principal at
Providence Equity Partners, a private equity firm specializing
in media and telecommunications, from 2000 to 2001. From 1984 to
2000, Ms. Katz worked for Goldman Sachs, an investment
bank, most recently as managing director. Ms. Katz is on
the board of directors of American Tower Corporation, a provider
of wireless and broadcast communications infrastructure.
Donald E. Morgan, (39), has served as a director on the
board of NII Holdings since 2002. Mr. Morgan is the founder
of, and has been a managing partner with, Brigade Capital
Management LLC since March 2006. From 2001 to March 2006, he had
been senior managing director and co-head of the Fixed
Income-High Yield Division of MacKay Shields LLC and had held
other positions with MacKay Shields since 1997. Prior to joining
MacKay Shields, Mr. Morgan was a high yield analyst with
Fidelity Management & Research, an affiliate of the
mutual fund company, where he worked from 1994 to 1997.
George A. Cope, (46), has served as a director on the
board of NII Holdings since 2004. A Canadian citizen,
Mr. Cope currently serves as President and Chief Operating
Officer of Bell Canada Corporation. From 2000 to 2005, he was
executive vice president of TELUS Corp. and president and chief
executive officer of TELUS Mobility. From 1987 to 2000, he
served as president and chief executive officer of Clearnet
Communications. Prior to joining Clearnet, Mr. Cope served
as vice president, Corporate Development at Lenbrook, Inc., a
distributor of electronic components, audio and two-way radio
products. Mr. Cope is on the board of directors of Bank of
Montreal.
GOVERNANCE
OF THE COMPANY
Our business and affairs are managed under the direction of the
Board of Directors in accordance with the Delaware General
Corporation Law and our Restated Certificate of Incorporation
and Second Amended and Restated Bylaws. Members of the Board of
Directors are kept informed of our business through discussions
with management, by reviewing materials provided to them, and by
participating in meetings of the Board of Directors and its
committees. The corporate governance practices that we follow
are summarized below.
Independence
The Board of Directors has determined that six of its eight
current members are independent as defined by The Nasdaq Stock
Market (Nasdaq) listing standards, including the
following: George A. Cope, Neal P. Goldman, Charles M.
Herington, Carolyn Katz, Donald E. Morgan and John W. Risner. In
making that determination, the Board of Directors did not
consider any relationships other than those described below in
Certain Relationships and Related Transactions. The
Audit Committee, Compensation Committee and Nominating Committee
are composed entirely of independent directors.
Lead
Independent Director
In February 2008, our Board of Directors adopted a policy to
provide for a lead director who must be independent, as defined
by Nasdaq listing standards. The policy provides that the lead
independent director will be selected annually by all of the
non-management directors. The non-management members of our
Board selected Carolyn Katz as the initial lead independent
director. The responsibilities of the lead independent director
are to
6
promote strong, independent oversight of our management and
affairs. As part of this responsibility, the duties of the lead
independent director include:
|
|
|
|
|
participating in the development and approval of the agenda for
meetings of the Board of Directors and the schedule and timing
of such meetings;
|
|
|
|
assuring the adequacy of the quality, quantity and timeliness of
information provided to non-management directors;
|
|
|
|
convening meetings of non-management directors as necessary and
appropriate;
|
|
|
|
presiding at meetings of the Board of Directors at which the
chairman is not present;
|
|
|
|
recommending to the chairman the retention of advisors and
consultants who report to the Board of Directors;
|
|
|
|
serving as principal liaison between the non-management
directors and the chairman;
|
|
|
|
assisting with the development, implementation and compliance
with corporate governance policies and practices; and
|
|
|
|
recommending the membership of committees of the Board and
committee chairman.
|
Code of
Ethics
The Board of Directors has approved a Code of Business Conduct
and Ethics for our directors, chief executive officer, chief
financial officer, principal financial and accounting officers,
officers and employees, and each of our subsidiaries and
controlled affiliates. The Code of Business Conduct and Ethics
addresses such topics as protection and proper use of our
assets, compliance with applicable laws and regulations,
accuracy and preservation of records, accounting and financial
reporting, conflicts of interest and insider trading. A current
copy of our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics may be viewed
free of charge on the Investor Relations link of our website at
the following address: www.nii.com and may also be
obtained by writing to us at NII Holdings, Inc., 1875 Explorer
Street, 10th Floor, Reston, Virginia 20190, Attention:
Investor Relations.
Only the Board of Directors or the Audit Committee may consider
a waiver of the Code of Business Conduct and Ethics for an
executive officer or director. If a provision of the Code of
Business Conduct and Ethics is materially modified, or if a
waiver of the Code of Business Conduct and Ethics is granted to
a director or executive officer, we will post a notice of such
action on the Investor Relations link of our website at the
following address: www.nii.com.
Meeting
Attendance
Board
and Committee Meetings
During 2007, each member of the Board of Directors attended at
least 75% of the aggregate meetings (during the periods for
which they served) of the Board of Directors and the committees
on which they served. In addition to attending meetings,
directors also fulfill their responsibilities by meeting or
communicating informally with one another regarding matters of
interest or concern to us, by attending, in person or
telephonically, sessions at which they are briefed about the
status of particular matters, by review of our reports to
directors, by visits to our facilities, and by correspondence
and telephone conferences with our executive officers and others
regarding matters of interest and concern to us.
Annual
Meeting of Stockholders
We encourage members of the Board of Directors to attend the
Annual Meeting. Each of the directors then serving on the Board
of Directors other than Mr. Morgan attended the 2007 Annual
Meeting of Stockholders.
7
Executive
Sessions of the Board
It is the practice of our Board of Directors to have executive
sessions where non-employee directors meet on an informal basis
at the beginning or end of each regularly scheduled meeting of
the Board of Directors. During these executive sessions,
directors can discuss matters of interest and concern and meet
with and question our employees outside the presence of employee
directors and other members of management.
Committees
of the Board
The standing committees of the Board of Directors are the Audit
Committee, the Compensation Committee, the Finance Committee and
the Nominating Committee. Membership on the Board of Directors
and each standing committee, as of April 10, 2008, was as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name
|
|
Board
|
|
|
Audit
|
|
|
Compensation
|
|
|
Nominating
|
|
|
Finance
|
|
|
Steven M. Shindler
|
|
|
X
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
Steven P. Dussek
|
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Neal P. Goldman
|
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
|
|
Charles M. Herington
|
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
*
|
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carolyn Katz
|
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
X
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
Donald E. Morgan
|
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
John W. Risner
|
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
*
|
George A. Cope
|
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Number of Meetings in 2007
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
9
|
(1)
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Chairman |
|
(1) |
|
During 2007, the Audit Committee also held private meetings with
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, our independent registered public
accounting firm. |
Audit
Committee
The Audit Committee assists the Board of Directors in its
oversight of the quality and integrity of our financial
statements and related disclosures and our accounting, auditing,
and reporting practices. The Audit Committees role
includes discussing with management our processes to manage
business and financial risk, and for compliance with significant
applicable legal, ethical, and regulatory requirements. The
Audit Committee is responsible for the appointment, replacement,
compensation, and oversight of the independent registered public
accounting firm engaged to prepare or issue audit reports on our
financial statements and for the oversight of our internal audit
function. The Audit Committee relies on the expertise and
knowledge of management and the internal auditors in carrying
out its oversight responsibilities. The specific
responsibilities in carrying out the Audit Committees
oversight role are delineated in the written charter adopted by
the Board. A current copy of the Audit Committee Charter may be
viewed free of charge on the Investor Relations link of our
website at the following address: www.nii.com and may
also be obtained by writing to us at NII Holdings, Inc., 1875
Explorer Street, 10th Floor, Reston, Virginia 20190,
Attention: Investor Relations.
The Board of Directors, in its business judgment, has determined
that all of the members of the Audit Committee are independent
as defined by regulations of the Securities and Exchange
Commission and the Nasdaq listing standards. The Board of
Directors has also determined that all of the members of the
Audit Committee have sufficient knowledge in financial and
auditing matters to serve on the Audit Committee and that
Carolyn Katz, Donald E. Morgan and John W. Risner each qualifies
as an audit committee financial expert as defined by
regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission.
The Audit Committee is authorized to engage or consult from time
to time, as appropriate, at our expense, independent legal
counsel and other experts and advisors it considers necessary,
appropriate or advisable in the discharge of its
responsibilities.
8
Compensation
Committee
The primary responsibilities of the Compensation Committee are
to:
|
|
|
|
|
review and approve the compensation of our chief executive
officer and all other executive officers;
|
|
|
|
review and approve executive bonus plan allocations for our
chief executive officer and all other executive officers and
review and approve the bonus plan terms for all other employees;
|
|
|
|
oversee and advise the Board of Directors on the adoption of
policies that govern our compensation programs;
|
|
|
|
oversee the administration of our equity-based compensation and
other benefit plans;
|
|
|
|
approve grants of stock options and stock awards to our
directors, officers and employees under our stock plan;
|
|
|
|
produce the report on executive compensation required by the
rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange
Commission; and
|
|
|
|
review the disclosures relating to executive compensation
contained in the Compensation Disclosure and Analysis with
management and recommend that those disclosures be included in
our annual proxy statement.
|
The Compensation Committee is authorized to engage or consult
from time to time, as appropriate, at our expense, consultants,
independent legal counsel and other experts and advisors it
considers necessary, appropriate or advisable in the discharge
of its responsibilities. The Compensation Committee operates
under a written charter adopted by the Board. A current copy of
the Compensation Committee Charter may be viewed free of charge
on the Investor Relations link of our website at the following
address: www.nii.com and may also be obtained by writing
to us at NII Holdings, Inc., 1875 Explorer Street,
10th Floor, Reston, Virginia 20190, Attention: Investor
Relations. The Board of Directors, in its business judgment, has
determined that all of the members of our Compensation Committee
are independent, as defined in the Nasdaq listing standards.
Nominating
Committee
The Nominating Committee develops qualifications for director
candidates and recommends to the Board of Directors persons to
serve as our directors. The Nominating Committee operates under
a written charter adopted by the Board. A current copy of the
Nominating Committee Charter may be viewed free of charge on the
Investor Relations link of our website at the following address:
www.nii.com and may also be obtained by writing to us at
NII Holdings, Inc., 1875 Explorer Street, 10th Floor,
Reston, Virginia 20190, Attention: Investor Relations. The Board
of Directors, in its business judgment, has determined that all
of the members of the Nominating Committee are independent, as
defined in the Nasdaq listing standards.
The Nominating Committee has set forth guidelines for the
evaluation of potential nominees. These guidelines set forth
standards by which potential nominees are to be evaluated,
including the following:
|
|
|
|
|
the ability of the prospective nominee to represent the
interests of our stockholders;
|
|
|
|
the prospective nominees standards of integrity,
commitment and independence of thought and judgment;
|
|
|
|
the prospective nominees independence from our company
under the Nasdaq listing standards;
|
|
|
|
the prospective nominees ability to dedicate sufficient
time, energy and attention to the diligent performance of his or
her duties, taking into account, among other things, the
prospective nominees service on other public company
boards; and
|
|
|
|
the extent to which the prospective nominee contributes to the
range of talent, skill and expertise appropriate for the Board
of Directors.
|
It is the policy of the Nominating Committee to consider
candidates recommended by stockholders. Stockholders entitled to
vote for the election of directors may submit candidates for
consideration if we receive written
9
notice, in proper form, for each such recommended nominee. If
the notice is not written and in proper form, then the
Nominating Committee cannot consider the nominee. To be in
proper form, the notice must include (1) each
nominees written consent to be named as a nominee and to
serve, if elected, (2) the name and address of the
stockholder making the nomination and evidence of share
ownership pursuant to the requirements of
Rule 14a-8
of the Securities and Exchange Commission relating to
stockholder proposals, and (3) information about the person
nominated for election conforming with the Securities and
Exchange Commissions biographical requirements for
directors. All stockholder nominations should be sent to:
Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary
NII Holdings, Inc.
1875 Explorer Street, 10th Floor
Reston, Virginia 20190
Finance
Committee
The primary responsibilities of the Finance Committee are to
consult with and provide guidance to management with respect to
our capital requirements and financing efforts. The Board of
Directors may also delegate its power to the Finance Committee
to approve the pricing and other terms of various financing
transactions.
Communications
with the Board of Directors
Stockholders may communicate directly with the Board of
Directors. All communications should be directed to our Vice
President, General Counsel and Secretary at the address below
and should prominently indicate on the outside of the envelope
that it is intended for the Board of Directors, or for
non-management directors. If no party is specified, the
communication will be forwarded to the entire Board of
Directors. Each communication intended for the Board of
Directors and received by the Vice President, General Counsel
and Secretary will be forwarded to the specified party following
its clearance through normal security procedures used for
regular mail. The communication will not be opened, but rather
will be forwarded unopened to the intended recipient.
Stockholder communications to the Board of Directors should be
sent to:
Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary
NII Holdings, Inc.
1875 Explorer Street, 10th Floor
Reston, Virginia 20190
10
EXECUTIVE
COMPENSATION
Compensation
Committee Report on Executive Compensation
The Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors is
responsible for the development, oversight and implementation of
our compensation program for executive officers, including our
executive chairman, chief executive officer, our chief financial
officer and each of our three other most highly compensated
executive officers who earned more than $100,000 in total
compensation for services, who we refer to as the named
executive officers, and in that role annually reviews and
establishes the compensation of our executive officers. The
Compensation Committee is committed to a philosophy that links a
significant portion of each executives compensation to
corporate performance. That philosophy guides the Compensation
Committees discussions and determinations with respect to
executive compensation.
The Compensation Committees primary goals in structuring
compensation for executives are to attract, motivate and retain
qualified and experienced executives and to provide executives
with meaningful and competitive financial rewards for superior
performance. To achieve these goals, the Compensation Committee
seeks to provide a mix of annual and long-term compensation that
will align the short- and long-term interests of our executives
with those of the company and our stockholders. In 2007, the
Compensation Committee approved an executive compensation
program that consisted of base salaries, an annual cash bonus
plan with payouts based on performance against defined targets
and long-term equity incentive awards of stock options and
restricted stock.
A discussion of the principles, objectives, components, analyses
and determinations of the Compensation Committee with respect to
executive compensation are included in the Compensation
Discussion and Analysis that follows this Committee report. The
specific decisions of the Compensation Committee regarding the
compensation of named executive officers are reflected in the
compensation tables and narrative that follow the Compensation
Discussion and Analysis.
The Compensation Committee has reviewed the Compensation
Discussion and Analysis included in this report and discussed it
with our management. Based on this review and discussion, the
Compensation Committee recommended that the Compensation
Discussion and Analysis be included in our 2007 annual report on
Form 10-K
or proxy statement for the 2008 annual meeting of stockholders.
Compensation Committee
Charles M. Herington, Chairman
George A. Cope
Neal P. Goldman
Compensation
Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation
No member of the Compensation Committee is a current or former
officer of us or any of our subsidiaries. In addition, there are
no compensation committee interlocks with other entities with
respect to any such member.
Compensation
Discussion and Analysis
The Compensation Committee of our Board of Directors annually,
or more frequently, reviews and establishes the salary and other
compensation of our executive officers, including the named
executive officers, and provides oversight of our equity based
compensation programs for other employees.
Compensation
Objectives and Philosophy
In making its determinations relating to executive compensation,
the Compensation Committees principal compensation
objectives are to:
|
|
|
|
|
align executive pay with corporate and stockholders
interests;
|
|
|
|
recognize individual initiative and achievements;
|
11
|
|
|
|
|
attract, motivate and retain highly qualified
executives; and
|
|
|
|
create incentives that drive the entire executive management
team to achieve defined common corporate goals.
|
To achieve these objectives the Compensation Committee has
followed a philosophy that focuses on an executives total
compensation, including cash and non-cash compensation, from all
sources and that links a significant portion of each
executives compensation to corporate performance.
In particular, the Compensation Committee believes that total
compensation for each executive should generally be set at a
level commensurate with the executives and our performance
and comparable to the total compensation paid by a peer group of
companies to executives in similar positions and with similar
levels of experience. The Compensation Committee also believes
that the greater portion of our executives compensation
should be at risk, so base salary and annual bonus components
are generally a relatively smaller portion, and the long-term
equity incentives are a relatively larger portion, of total
compensation than is the case for the executives employed by the
peer companies.
The Compensation Committee generally does not take into account
the potential payments to executives under our severance plans,
including payments that may be made in connection with an
executives termination, in connection with a change of
control or in other circumstances as described below in
Severance Plans when determining total
compensation. The Compensation Committee believes that the terms
of these arrangements are generally consistent with those
offered by similarly situated companies including those in the
peer group companies.
Our current compensation program does not provide for the
reduction or recovery of payments and awards made to our
executives in the event that our financial statements were to be
restated in the future in a manner that would have impacted the
size or payment of the award at the time of payment. In the
future, we may consider the adoption of a policy regarding
recovery of payments or awards to our executives in those
circumstances.
Setting
Executive Compensation
When determining each executives total compensation and
mix of compensation components, the Compensation Committee looks
to a number of factors to be sure it is effectively implementing
our executive compensation philosophy. Those factors include the
following:
|
|
|
|
|
our financial and operating performance, measured by attainment
of specific strategic objectives and operating results;
|
|
|
|
the duties, responsibilities and performance of each executive
officer, including the achievement of identified goals for the
year as they pertain to the areas of our operations for which
the executive is personally responsible and accountable;
|
|
|
|
historic cash and equity compensation levels of the executive
and similarly situated executives; and
|
|
|
|
comparative industry market data, which is used to assess
compensation competitiveness.
|
The Compensation Committee also takes into consideration, among
other things, the recommendations made by the chief executive
officer (with respect to the compensation of executives other
than the chief executive officer), recommendations of our human
resources professionals and the advice and recommendations of
its executive compensation consultant.
Role of the Compensation Consultant
The Compensation Committee has engaged Mercer Consulting, an
outside global human resources consulting firm, to conduct an
annual review of the Companys executive compensation
program. In connection with its review, Mercer Consulting
advises the Compensation Committee as to the competitiveness of
executive compensation packages and provides the Compensation
Committee with data relating to the total compensation levels
and relative amounts of cash and equity compensation earned by
executives in comparable positions within the peer group of
companies described below as well as information regarding
industry trends relevant to executive
12
compensation. Specifically, Mercer Consulting provides the
Compensation Committee with, among other things, the following
analyses that assess the competitiveness of our senior
executives compensation:
|
|
|
|
|
a comparison of our performance with that of the peer group of
companies over one and three year periods with respect to
several performance measures including with respect to revenues,
revenue growth, return on each of invested capital, assets and
equity and total shareholder return; and
|
|
|
|
a comparison of each named executives cash and non-cash
compensation and total compensation with that of the comparable
executives at the peer group companies over one and three year
periods including a ranking of each component of the
executives comparison relative to the comparable
executives in the peer group and a comparison of our
executives total compensation relative to that of the
executives in the peer group companies taking into account our
performance in comparison to that of the peer group companies.
|
In making these comparisons, Mercer Consulting utilizes the
reported information included in the peer group companies
public filings with certain adjustments that are designed to
normalize the information to take into account differences in
valuation techniques we use compared to those used by the peer
group companies and differences in the terms of the compensation
arrangements used by the peer group companies. These adjustments
are designed to improve the comparability of our compensation
components with those utilized by the peer group companies.
Use of Comparative Industry Data
With respect to comparative industry data, the Compensation
Committee reviews executive salaries and evaluates the
compensation structures and the financial performance of
comparable companies in a designated peer group established by
the Compensation Committee with assistance from its executive
compensation consultants. The peer group is focused principally
on high performing public companies selected from the NASDAQ 100
and includes those in the telecommunications or related
industries and companies that are similar to us in size in terms
of revenues, assets or other characteristics and complexity or
companies with similar market capitalizations and other
characteristics. In 2007, the following companies were selected
as the peer group for purposes of collecting comparative
industry market data:
|
|
|
American Power Conversion Corporation
|
|
Marvell Technology Group LTD
|
Autodesk Incorporated
|
|
Network Appliance Incorporated
|
Broadcom Corporation
|
|
Patterson Companies, Incorporated
|
Dentsply International Incorporated
|
|
Sandisk Corporation
|
Dobson Communications Corporation
|
|
Sigma-Aldrich Corporation
|
Fastenal Company
|
|
Tellabs Incorporated
|
IDT Corporation
|
|
United States Cellular Corporation
|
Level 3 Communications, Inc.
|
|
|
The financial performance measures used by the Compensation
Committee to evaluate our performance in comparison to the
performance of the peer group companies include revenue growth,
return on invested capital, and return on assets, return on
equity and total stockholder return.
Determination of Total Compensation and Compensation
Components
The Compensation Committee sets total compensation ranges for
our executive officers based on factors such as the competitive
environment, historic compensation levels of the executive and
similarly situated executives, individual performance, and the
compensation levels contemplated by the Companys annual
budget. Based on these criteria and the financial performance
measures used to evaluate our performance in comparison to the
peer group of companies, the Compensation Committee establishes
the total compensation ranges for each executive based on the
ranking of the companys performance within, and the
comparable compensation amounts for similarly situated
executives within, the peer group. In some instances,
adjustments are made to the total compensation ranges to take
into account the executives tenure, experience,
responsibilities of the position and other contributions.
13
Once total compensation ranges are set for executive officers,
the Compensation Committee determines how that compensation will
be allocated among the principal components of our compensation
program, which include:
|
|
|
|
|
base salaries;
|
|
|
|
annual cash incentive payments in the form of annual
bonuses; and
|
|
|
|
long-term equity incentives in the form of restricted stock and
nonqualified stock options.
|
The Compensation Committee allocates the executives total
compensation among components of executive compensation to
strike an appropriate balance between cash and stock
compensation and between short-term and long-term incentives
consistent with our overall philosophy on executive
compensation. This allocation is designed to ensure that a
significant portion of each executives total compensation
is tied to our performance and to the creation of stockholder
value. We differentiate the composition of compensation among
the members of the executive team based on each executives
position and responsibility, with executives at higher
compensation levels having a greater percentage of both their
total compensation and cash compensation tied to corporate
performance. Accordingly, executives with greater roles and
responsibilities associated with achieving our performance
targets bear a greater proportion of the risk that those goals
are not achieved and receive a greater proportion of the reward
if our performance targets are met or surpassed. In addition, as
an executives position and responsibility increases, the
long-term incentive compensation component of executive
compensation becomes more significant because our most senior
executives have the greatest influence on our strategic
performance over time.
As a matter of process, the Compensation Committee begins the
allocation of the executives total compensation among the
components of executive compensation by setting base salary and
annual target bonus amounts for each executive. Base salary is
based primarily on historic base salary levels with adjustments
to reflect customary annual increases consistent with our annual
budget for base salary increases; to recognize outstanding
individual performance or expanded duties; or to address changes
in the competitive marketplace. Incremental amounts paid to
executives who work outside the United States to compensate them
for the additional costs and other obligations relating to those
assignments such as amounts paid for security
services, housing costs, travel costs and certain related tax
obligations are not taken into consideration in
determining base salary and are not used in calculating the
annual target bonus amounts as described below.
The annual target bonus amount for each executive officer is
determined by multiplying his or her base salary by the target
bonus percentage applicable to that position. The Compensation
Committee, in consultation with our senior executives, designs
the annual bonus program to provide incentives to achieve the
corporate performance goals established by our Board of
Directors. As described in more detail below, the target bonus
percentages for the executive officers range from 50% to 80%
based on position.
Consistent with the Compensation Committees view that the
greater portion of executive compensation should be at risk, the
base salary and annual bonus components of total compensation
are generally below the 75th percentile of the comparable
amounts for executives within the peer group of companies while
the total compensation is generally between the 75th and
90th percentile of those comparable amounts, resulting in a
relatively greater proportion of the executives total
compensation being allocated to long-term equity incentives. The
resulting increased emphasis on stock option grants is
consistent with our compensation philosophy because stock
options require stock price appreciation in order for executives
to realize any benefit, thus directly aligning executive and
stockholder interests. Restricted stock awards provide a similar
alignment of interests while providing a substantial retention
incentive through their vesting terms.
To determine the amount of the long-term equity incentives for
each executive officer, including grants of restricted stock and
nonqualified stock options, the equity compensation target
amount is calculated by subtracting the cash components of
compensation (i.e., base salary and the target annual bonus
amount) for each executive officer from the total compensation
target range for that executive officer.
The value of the outstanding restricted stock grants made to
each executive and allocated to the current year is then
determined. This amount is calculated by allocating the value of
each restricted stock grant made to the executive, which is
determined based on the aggregate value of the underlying common
stock on the date of grant, ratably over the applicable vesting
period of the restricted stock grant. The amount includes a
portion of value of
14
grants of restricted stock made in prior years that is
attributable to the current year based on the vesting schedule
of the relevant restricted stock grants. That allocated amount
is then subtracted from the equity compensation target amount
for the executive.
The number of shares subject to grants of nonqualified stock
options to each executive officer is then determined by dividing
the remaining equity compensation target amount by the fair
market value per option. As described in more detail below, the
fair market value per option is determined using the
Black-Scholes-Merton option pricing model. The number of options
determined under this formula is then compared to the annual
grants made to that executive officer in prior years and to the
grants proposed to be made to other executive officers to ensure
equity/parity among similarly situated executives. In the case
of executive officers other than the chief executive officer,
the amount of the proposed grant is also reviewed in light of
the recommendations of the chief executive officer.
As a result of this process, the sum of the values of the base
salary, the target bonus amount, the value of the restricted
stock grants allocable to the year and the fair market value of
the option grant are generally within the total compensation
target range for the executive officer for that year.
2007
Executive Compensation
Total Compensation
In 2007, the Compensation Committee established the total
compensation ranges to fall generally between the 75th and
90th percentile of the comparable compensation amounts for
similarly situated executives within the peer group of companies
with adjustments based on the executives tenure, position,
skills, experience, attainment of goals and other contributions.
The Compensation Committee based its decision to use this range
of comparable compensation percentages on our performance in
comparison to the performance of peer group companies with
respect to revenue growth, return on invested capital, return on
assets, return on equity and total stockholder return. In
particular, in making the comparisons with the peer group, the
Committee considered our ranking in comparison to the peer group
in relation to each of these performance measures individually
and in the aggregate. In making the comparisons of the
individual named executives compensation to that of the
executives at the peer group companies, the Compensation
Committee took into account both the overall level of
compensation paid to the named executive officers within the
peer group companies and the nature of the positions held by the
executives at the peer group companies in comparison to the
positions held by our named executive officers. The comparable
compensation amounts for the peer group executives were
determined using information reported by the peer group
companies as adjusted and normalized to take into account
differences in valuation techniques we use compared to those
used by the peer group companies and differences in the terms of
the compensation arrangements used by the peer group companies.
In making the 2007 executive compensation decisions, the
Compensation Committee relied primarily on the relative ranking
of our performance compared to the peer group companies using
the performance measures described above. Based on that
comparison, the Compensation Committee set the total
compensation level for each of our named executive officers
between the 75th and 90th percentiles taking into
consideration the Compensation Committees assessment of
the individual performance of each of our named executive
officers during 2006. Based on this assessment, the Compensation
Committee set Mr. Shindlers total compensation level
at the 80th percentile of the comparable compensation
amounts of similarly situated executives at the peer group
companies, adjusted as discussed above. The total compensation
levels set by the Compensation Committee for each of Messrs. van
Gemert, Felipe and Foyo ranged from the 77th percentile to
the 85th percentile of the comparable compensation amounts
of similarly situated executives at the peer group companies
with those adjustments. Mr. Siliezars total
compensation level was set by the Compensation Committee based
on his new role as our vice president of business development.
Mr. Hemmadys total compensation level for 2007, which
was negotiated in conjunction with his hiring as our chief
financial officer in May of 2007, was generally consistent with
the range of compensation levels in comparison to the similarly
situated executives at the peer group companies that was used
for our other named executive officers.
15
The annual total compensation level for our named executive
officers for 2007 (effective from April 1, 2007 through
March 31, 2008, except as noted below) and the percentage
change from 2006 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007 Total
|
|
|
|
|
Compensation
|
|
Percent Change
|
Name and Position
|
|
Level(1)
|
|
From 2006
|
|
Steven M. Shindler(2)
|
|
$
|
9,657,371
|
|
|
|
23.7
|
%
|
Chief executive officer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gokul Hemmady(3)
|
|
$
|
3,074,000
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
Vice president and
chief financial officer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Byron R. Siliezar(4)
|
|
$
|
2,445,460
|
|
|
|
(22.1
|
)%
|
Vice president of
business development
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lodewijk van Gemert
|
|
$
|
4,271,797
|
|
|
|
(17.1
|
)%
|
Chief operating officer
and president
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jose Felipe
|
|
$
|
2,946,737
|
|
|
|
(4.8
|
)%
|
President, Nextel Mercosur
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Peter Foyo
|
|
$
|
3,111,315
|
|
|
|
(2.6
|
)%
|
President, Nextel Mexico
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The total compensation level is calculated as the sum of
(a) base salary, (b) the target annual bonus amount
for the year assuming a payout of 100%, (c) the value of
the portion of each restricted stock grant made to the executive
in the current or prior year that is allocable to the applicable
year, and (d) the fair market value of the option awards
made during the applicable year determined on the date of grant
using the Black-Scholes method under Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards No. 123 (Revised 2004),
Share-Based Payment, or SFAS 123R, but
disregarding estimated forfeitures related to service-based
vesting conditions and with certain adjustments as noted below. |
|
(2) |
|
Amounts in 2007 for Mr. Shindler include the full value of
the options to purchase 185,000 shares of our common stock
granted to him on April 25, 2007. On February 11,
2008, Mr. Shindler surrendered, without consideration,
options to purchase 50,000 shares of common stock that were
granted to him on April 25, 2007. The surrender of options
was made by Mr. Shindler in connection with his transition
to a new position as Executive Chairman of NII Holdings, Inc.
Amounts for Mr. Shindler do not include the value relating
to the personal use of our corporate aircraft and reimbursements
for taxes relating to imputed income for personal use of our
corporate aircraft. |
|
(3) |
|
Mr. Hemmady was hired to serve as our Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer effective May 21, 2007.
Mr. Hemmadys compensation for 2007 was set in
connection with his hiring and not as part of the annual
compensation review process. Accordingly, his annual total
compensation amount assumes a full year of compensation at the
levels and on the terms established when he joined the company. |
|
(4) |
|
Mr. Siliezar stepped down as Chief Financial Officer
effective May 21, 2007 to become our Vice President of
Business Development. |
Base Salary
In 2007, the Compensation Committee determined that executive
base salaries for executive officers should be targeted at
levels consistent with the historic compensation levels adjusted
to reflect customary annual increases that were consistent with
our budget for base salary increases.
16
The annual base salaries for our named executive officers for
2007 (effective from April 1, 2007 through March 31,
2008), the percentage change from 2006 and the percentage of
total compensation base salaries represented are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007 Annual
|
|
|
Percent Change
|
|
|
Percent of Total
|
|
Name
|
|
Base Salary
|
|
|
From 2006
|
|
|
Compensation
|
|
|
Steven M. Shindler
|
|
$
|
720,000
|
|
|
|
5.1
|
%
|
|
|
7.5
|
%
|
Gokul Hemmady
|
|
$
|
400,000
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
13.0
|
%
|
Byron R. Siliezar
|
|
$
|
367,579
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
15.0
|
%
|
Lodewijk van Gemert
|
|
$
|
432,042
|
|
|
|
5.0
|
%
|
|
|
10.1
|
%
|
Jose Felipe
|
|
$
|
386,082
|
|
|
|
5.0
|
%
|
|
|
13.1
|
%
|
Peter Foyo
|
|
$
|
367,500
|
|
|
|
5.0
|
%
|
|
|
11.8
|
%
|
Annual Bonus
In 2008, cash bonuses were paid to our executive officers (other
than Mr. Siliezar) for the achievement of certain corporate
financial and operating targets relating to our 2007 fiscal year
(the 2007 Bonus Plan). In February 2007, the
Compensation Committee determined that the criteria relating to
our performance that were used to determine the amounts paid
under our 2007 Bonus Plan to executive officers located at our
headquarters. These criteria were consolidated operating income
before depreciation and amortization, or consolidated OIBDA,
consolidated net subscriber additions, consolidated OIBDA
margin, headquarters operating expenses and succession planning.
For executive officers who are responsible for operations in one
or more countries, the criteria relating to our performance that
were used to determine the amounts paid under the 2007 Bonus
Plan were OIBDA, net subscriber additions and OIBDA margin for
the applicable country as well as consolidated OIBDA,
consolidated net subscriber additions, and consolidated OIBDA
margin. The bonus criteria, each of which is weighted, also
include a component based on our ongoing management succession
planning activities. The targeted amounts for each of Messrs
Shindler, Hemmady and van Gemert, the named executive officers
located at headquarters who received bonus payments, were as
follows (dollar amounts in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
|
|
|
HQ
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subscriber
|
|
|
|
|
|
OIBDA
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating
|
|
|
|
|
|
Succession
|
|
|
|
|
Named Executive Officer
|
|
OIBDA
|
|
|
Weight%
|
|
|
Additions
|
|
|
Weight%
|
|
|
Margin
|
|
|
Weight%
|
|
|
Expenses
|
|
|
Weight%
|
|
|
Planning
|
|
|
Weight%
|
|
|
Steven M. Shindler
|
|
$
|
870
|
|
|
|
45
|
%
|
|
|
1,130,152
|
|
|
|
35
|
%
|
|
|
35.5
|
%
|
|
|
5
|
%
|
|
$
|
(143
|
)
|
|
|
5
|
%
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
10
|
%
|
Gokul Hemmady
|
|
$
|
870
|
|
|
|
45
|
%
|
|
|
1,130,152
|
|
|
|
35
|
%
|
|
|
35.5
|
%
|
|
|
5
|
%
|
|
$
|
(143
|
)
|
|
|
5
|
%
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
10
|
%
|
Lodewijk van Gemert
|
|
$
|
870
|
|
|
|
45
|
%
|
|
|
1,130,152
|
|
|
|
35
|
%
|
|
|
35.5
|
%
|
|
|
5
|
%
|
|
$
|
(143
|
)
|
|
|
5
|
%
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
10
|
%
|
The targeted amounts for Messrs Felipe, who was the named
executive officer responsible for our operations in the Mercosur
region (which consists of Argentina, Brazil and Chile) and
Mr. Foyo, who was the named executive officer responsible
for our operation in Mexico, were as follows (dollar amounts in
millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Country/
|
|
|
|
Country/
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
|
Country/
|
|
|
|
Region Net
|
|
|
|
Region
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
Weight
|
|
Subscriber
|
|
Weight
|
|
Region
|
|
Weight
|
|
Subscriber
|
|
Weight
|
|
OIBDA
|
|
Weight
|
|
Succession
|
|
Weight
|
Named Executive Officer
|
|
OIBDA
|
|
%
|
|
Additions
|
|
%
|
|
OIBDA
|
|
%
|
|
Additions
|
|
%
|
|
Margin
|
|
%
|
|
Planning
|
|
%
|
|
Jose Felipe
|
|
$
|
870
|
|
|
|
10
|
%
|
|
|
1,130,152
|
|
|
|
5
|
%
|
|
$
|
269
|
|
|
|
40
|
%
|
|
|
516,787
|
|
|
|
25
|
%
|
|
|
27.2
|
%
|
|
|
10
|
%
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
10
|
%
|
Peter Foyo
|
|
$
|
870
|
|
|
|
10
|
%
|
|
|
1,130,152
|
|
|
|
5
|
%
|
|
$
|
719
|
|
|
|
40
|
%
|
|
|
509,822
|
|
|
|
25
|
%
|
|
|
42.2
|
%
|
|
|
10
|
%
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
10
|
%
|
The 2007 Bonus Plan was designed to provide incentive bonuses
that would reward executives for superior achievement and be
competitive as compared to bonuses paid by the peer group of
companies established by the Compensation Committee, while being
consistent with the Compensation Committees views on the
appropriate levels of total compensation. The performance
measures and the target amounts used for the 2007 Bonus Plan
were initially developed and recommended by our senior
executives in December 2006 based on their assessment of our
2007 operating and financial goals that were included in our
operating budget for 2007. These proposals were evaluated by the
Compensation Committee, with the input of its outside
compensation consultants, in light of the Compensation
Committees overall compensation philosophy of placing
greater weight on the at risk components of
compensation and our short and long term strategies and goals.
This review resulted in the Compensation Committees
determination that 2007 incentive bonuses for the named
executive officers should be targeted at the following
percentages of base salary for each of the named executive
officers: Mr. Shindler 80%; Mr. van
Gemert 60%; Mr. Felipe 50% and
17
Mr. Foyo 50%. The Compensation Committee
conducted a similar evaluation and review in connection with the
hiring of Mr. Hemmady and targeted his 2007 incentive bonus
at 60% of his annual base salary. Under the terms of the 2007
Bonus Plan the payout could range from 80% to 120% of the target
bonus amounts based on the percentage of the specific target
performance goals achieved. The minimum achievement required to
qualify for any bonus payment was 80% of the specified target
performance goals under the 2007 Bonus Plan. The maximum payout
of a bonus was 120% of the target bonus amounts which required
achievement of at least 120% of the specified target performance
goals under the 2007 Bonus Plan.
To determine bonus amounts earned by our executive officers
during the plan year, the Compensation Committee meets following
the fiscal year end to review our financial and operating
performance as compared to the applicable performance measures
and to discuss performance factors and other criteria related to
the award of bonuses. In some instances, the Compensation
Committee, upon the recommendation of management, makes
adjustments to the bonus payments based on, among other things,
changes in our corporate goals and business conditions during
the course of the bonus plan year if it concludes that such
adjustments are appropriate and are consistent with our overall
goals and strategy. The Compensation Committee considers, but is
not bound by, the recommendations of executive officers,
including the chief executive officer, with respect to the
payment or amounts of bonuses to executive officers.
In 2007, the company achieved on a consolidated basis 113% of
the performance target for OIBDA, 114% of the performance target
for net subscriber additions, 100% of the performance target for
OIBDA margin, 102% of the performance targets relating to both
headquarters operating expenses and 100% of its performance
target related to succession planning. Nextel Mexico achieved
103% of its performance target for OIBDA (after adjustment to
take into account the impact of a significant increase in the
number of net subscriber additions by Nextel Mexico that was
approved subsequent to the creation of the 2007 Bonus targets)
and 117% of its performance target for net subscriber additions,
but it did not achieve its performance target for OIBDA margin.
The Mercosur region achieved 120% of the performance target for
OIBDA, 109% of the performance target for net subscriber
additions, and 103% of the performance target for OIBDA margin.
Based on these results, and giving effect to certain adjustments
approved by the Compensation Committee to reflect changes in
corporate goals and business conditions during 2007, the named
executive officers bonus payouts under the 2007 Bonus Plan
ranged from 98% to 113% of the target bonus amounts, which were
based on predetermined percentages of base salary as described
above. Based on the foregoing, the bonuses awarded to the named
executive officers for 2007, the percentage changes from 2006
and the percentage of total compensation the bonuses represented
were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent Change
|
|
|
Total
|
|
Name
|
|
2007 Bonus
|
|
|
From 2006
|
|
|
Compensation
|
|
|
Steven M. Shindler
|
|
$
|
599,040
|
|
|
|
8.2
|
%
|
|
|
6.2
|
%
|
Gokul Hemmady(1)
|
|
$
|
167,232
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
5.6
|
%
|
Byron R. Siliezar(2)
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
|
N/M
|
|
|
|
N/M
|
|
Lodewijk van Gemert
|
|
$
|
269,594
|
|
|
|
5.0
|
%
|
|
|
6.3
|
%
|
Jose Felipe
|
|
$
|
218,136
|
|
|
|
4.1
|
%
|
|
|
7.4
|
%
|
Peter Foyo
|
|
$
|
180,075
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)%
|
|
|
5.8
|
%
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Mr. Hemmadys bonus award reflects the prorated amount
based on his service from May 1, 2007 through
December 31, 2007. Had Mr. Hemmady been employed for
the full year, his bonus award would have been $249,600, which
would have represented 8.3% of his total compensation. |
|
(2) |
|
Mr. Siliezar was not entitled to receive a bonus award for
2007 because he was no longer employed by the Company on the
date the bonus was paid. |
The percentages of annual base salary used to determine the 2007
annual bonus targets were consistent with those used in 2006.
Accordingly, the change in the bonus amounts paid in 2007
relative to 2006 was primarily due to a combination of the
increases in the executive officers base salaries and our
performance in 2007 in comparison to the 2007 operating targets.
18
Long-Term Equity Incentives
The Compensation Committee provides equity-based incentives to
executive officers through the 2004 Incentive Compensation Plan,
which permits the grant of stock options, stock appreciation
rights, stock awards, performance stock awards, incentive awards
and stock units. The Compensation Committee assigns a value to
the grant of stock options based on the Black-Scholes-Merton
option-pricing model using the same assumptions that we use in
calculating the compensation expense attributable to such grants
under Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123
(Revised 2004), Share-Based Payment, or
SFAS 123R, except that for purposes of this analysis, we
disregard estimated forfeitures related to service-based vesting
conditions and use the full 10 year term as the expected
life of the option so our calculations generate an assumed value
that is higher than the value that is used to calculate the
expense pursuant to under SFAS 123R.
In keeping with the Compensation Committees general
practice regarding long-term equity incentives discussed above,
the relative amounts of executive compensation allocated to
long-term equity in 2007 were determined by subtracting base
salary and bonus potential from the total compensation set for
each executive officer by the Compensation Committee. The
remaining amount of compensation was allocated to long-term
equity. The Compensation Committee considered the long-term
equity incentives available under the 2004 Incentive
Compensation Plan and granted non-qualified stock options to our
executive officers. The Compensation Committee uses grants of
restricted stock as a long term retention incentive that is
attributable to a number of years rather than a component of
annual compensation for the particular year of grant, although,
as described above, the portion of the value of current or
previous grants of restricted stock allocable to the year is
taken into account in determining annual compensation for that
year. Consistent with this approach, no grants of restricted
stock were made during 2007 other than the grant of restricted
shares to Mr. Hemmady in connection with the commencement
of his employment with the Company.
The 2007 stock option awards to executive officers vest 25% per
year for four years on each anniversary of the date of grant.
The stock options were granted at the closing market price on
the date of grant and expire after ten years. Consistent with
prior grants, the restricted stock award to Mr. Hemmady
will vest on the third anniversary of the date of the award,
which was the date of the commencement of his employment with
the Company. The vesting of the stock options and restricted
stock is not conditioned on any individual performance of the
executive or on our financial or operating performance.
Timing
of Long-Term Incentive Awards
Our practice with respect to the timing of long-term incentive
awards has been to make grants of nonqualified stock options
and/or
awards of restricted stock to executive officers once each year
in late April, which has historically coincided with scheduled
meetings of the Board of Directors and various committees,
including the Compensation Committee. Non-employee directors
also typically received annual grants of stock options in
connection with the April board meetings. In the future, we
expect to continue the practice of making grants of options
and/or
awards of restricted stock at our regular Board of Directors and
committee meetings scheduled in April of each year. Awards of
stock options or other equity incentives to new executive
officers and directors occur at the time of the persons
appointment or election as an executive officer or director. In
addition, our chief executive officer may grant, under authority
delegated to him by the Compensation Committee, a limited number
of stock options (not to exceed 10,000 shares in any single
grant and 100,000 shares in the aggregate, with such
aggregate amount subject to renewal by the Compensation
Committee from time to time) to employees who are not executive
officers. Pursuant to the 2004 Equity Plan, the exercise price
of all stock options is not lower than the closing market price
of our stock on the date of grant.
In 2007, the Board and committee meeting at which the equity
grants were made occurred on April 25, 2007. With the
exception of Mr. Hemmady, who received grants of stock
options and restricted stock upon the commencement of his
employment on May 21, 2007, grants of nonqualified stock
options to executive officers and directors for 2007 were made
by the Compensation Committee on April 25, 2007.
Non-employee directors serving on the Board of Directors as of
the annual meeting of stockholders also received grants of stock
options on April 25, 2007. The exercise price of these
stock options for each grant was the closing market price on the
date of grant.
19
We also follow a practice of disclosing our financial results
for the first quarter of the fiscal year following the April
Board of Directors meeting at which time those results are
discussed. The 2007 first quarter earnings release was made
publicly available on April 26, 2007. Although the members
of the Compensation Committee were aware of the impending
release of information relating to first quarter results at the
time grants of stock options were made, the Compensation
Committee did not use such information in determining the amount
of the awards to be made to executive officers and directors for
that fiscal year nor did the Compensation Committee withhold the
making of grants to confer a benefit on the recipient of a grant
or avoid a loss in value of a grant.
We are aware that the release of our quarterly financial results
may have an impact on the market price of our common stock, and
therefore the value of the option grant, depending on whether
the information is favorable or unfavorable. However, we believe
that the April Board of Directors meeting is an appropriate time
during the year to make option grants and that a consistent
application of our option granting practices from year to year
regardless of the content of the first quarter earnings release
is also appropriate. The stock options granted by the
Compensation Committee are designed to create incentives for the
creation of long-term stockholder value and contain delayed
vesting provisions that prevent recipients of stock options from
taking advantage of short-term fluctuations in the market price
of our common stock.
We have not planned in the past, nor do we plan in the future,
to time the release of material non-public information for the
purpose of affecting the value of executive compensation. We do
not have a practice of setting the exercise price of options
based on the stock price on any date other than the grant date,
nor do we use a formula or any other method to select a price
based on a period before, after or surrounding the grant date.
Nonqualified stock options are always granted at the closing
price of our common stock on the date of grant.
Executive
Stock Ownership Guidelines
In October 2004, we adopted an executive target stock ownership
program that requires our executive officers to attain
designated stock ownership levels, and therefore maintain a
vested interest in our equity performance. Over a five-year
period, the executive officers covered by the program are
expected to reach the targeted ownership levels based on
specific share value targets per executive officer level. The
types of stock ownership that qualify toward the ownership
requirement under our policy include direct stock ownership and
vested options where the exercise price is lower than the fair
market value of our common stock. The penalty for non-compliance
of our policy may include a discontinuation of future equity
grants until compliance is achieved.
The executive stock ownership guidelines required that
Mr. Shindler reach a targeted stock ownership level with a
value equal to two times his base salary by December 31,
2005, a value equal to four times his base salary by
December 31, 2007 and a value equal to five times his base
salary by December 31, 2009. For the remaining named
executive officers other than Mr. Hemmady, the program
required the executive officer to reach a targeted stock
ownership level with a value equal to his base salary by
December 31, 2005, a value equal to two times his base
salary by December 31, 2007 and a value equal to three
times his base salary by December 31, 2009.
Mr. Hemmady is required to reach a targeted stock ownership
level with a value equal to his base salary by the third
anniversary of his election as an executive officer, a value
equal to two times his base salary by the fourth anniversary of
his election as an executive officer and a value equal to three
times his base salary by the fifth anniversary of his election
as an executive officer. All of the named executive officers met
these requirements as of December 31, 2006 and all named
executive officers other than Mr. van Gemert and Mr. Foyo
met these stock ownership requirements as of December 31,
2007. As a result of purchases of shares made on
February 29, 2008, Mr. van Gemert and Mr. Foyo met
these requirements as of that date.
20
The share targets for the named executive officers who are
currently employed by the Company and the percentage of the
target attained at December 31, 2007, based on the base
salary levels paid in 2007 and the closing price of our common
stock on the Nasdaq Global Select Market on December 31,
2007 of $48.32 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent of
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007 Target
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 Target
|
|
Name
|
|
2007 Target
|
|
|
Attained
|
|
|
2009 Target
|
|
|
Attained
|
|
|
Steven M. Shindler
|
|
$
|
2,880,000
|
|
|
|
165
|
%
|
|
$
|
3,600,000
|
|
|
|
132
|
%
|
Gokul Hemmady
|
|
$
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
$
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
Lodewijk van Gemert
|
|
$
|
864,084
|
|
|
|
89
|
%
|
|
$
|
1,296,126
|
|
|
|
60
|
%
|
Jose Felipe
|
|
$
|
772,164
|
|
|
|
125
|
%
|
|
$
|
1,158,246
|
|
|
|
83
|
%
|
Peter Foyo
|
|
$
|
735,000
|
|
|
|
82
|
%
|
|
$
|
1,102,500
|
|
|
|
55
|
%
|
Our corporate policy that applies to trading in our stock by
executive officers restricts the hedging by the named executive
officers of the economic risk of ownership of our common stock.
Tax
Deductibility Under Section 162(m)
Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code imposes a
limitation on the deductibility of nonperformance-based
compensation in excess of $1 million paid to named
executive officers of public companies. As noted above, the
Compensation Committee has implemented a compensation program
that links a substantial portion of each executives
compensation to performance. We intend to qualify executive
compensation for deductibility under Section 162(m) if
doing so is consistent with our best interests and the interests
of our stockholders. Since our corporate objectives may not
always be consistent with the requirements of full
deductibility, it is conceivable that we may enter into
compensation arrangements in the future under which payments are
not deductible under Section 162(m). We currently believe
that we should be able to continue to manage our executive
compensation program for the named executive officers to
preserve the related federal income tax deductions, although
individual exceptions may occur.
Retirement,
Deferred Compensation and Pension Plans
Our executive officers who are eligible may participate at their
election in our 401(k) retirement savings plan that provides
employees with an opportunity to contribute a portion of their
cash compensation to the plan on a tax-deferred basis to be
invested in specified investment options and distributed upon
their retirement. Consistent with the 401(k) plan, we match 100%
of each employees contributions to the 401(k) plan up to a
maximum of 4% of the employees base salary. The employer
matching contribution vests based on the employees years
of service. Our matching contribution for 2007 for named
executive officers was $40,020 in the aggregate.
Our Board of Directors has not adopted any plans for the
deferral of executive compensation or for the payment of defined
benefits or pensions based on an executive officers salary
and/or years
of service. In addition, we have not adopted a supplemental
executive retirement plan or other excess plan that
pays benefits to highly compensated executives whose salaries
exceed the Internal Revenue Services maximum allowable
salary for qualified plans.
Severance
Plans
We previously adopted two severance plans that provide for the
payment of severance benefits to employees, including our
executive officers, if their employment is terminated in
specified circumstances. One plan provides for the payment of
severance benefits if the executive officers employment is
terminated without cause for certain reasons and the other plan
provides for the payment of severance benefits if the executive
officers employment is terminated without cause, or if the
executive officer terminates his or her employment with good
reason, in connection with a change of control. The two
severance plans are mutually exclusive. These arrangements have
been in place for several years and were not modified in 2007.
While the Compensation Committee generally does not take into
account the potential payments to executives under our severance
plans, including termination and change of control arrangements,
in performing its annual evaluation of the total compensation
that may be realized by our executive officers, the Compensation
Committee believes that the terms of these arrangements are
generally consistent with those offered by similarly situated
companies including those in the peer group. A description of
the
21
terms of our severance plans, the specific circumstances that
trigger payment of benefits, an estimate of benefits payable
upon the occurrence of those triggering events and other
information relating to such plans can be found below under the
caption Executive Compensation Potential
Payments under Severance Plans.
Annual
Compensation of Executive Officers
Summary
Compensation Table
In the table below and discussion that follows it, we summarize
the compensation earned during 2007 by our chief executive
officer, each of the individuals who served as our chief
financial officer during the year, and each of our three other
most highly compensated executive officers who earned more than
$100,000 in total compensation for services rendered in all
capacities during 2007. We refer to these individuals in this
proxy statement as the named executive officers.
Summary
Compensation Table
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Value and
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonqualified
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-Equity
|
|
Deferred
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
Option
|
|
Incentive Plan
|
|
Compensation
|
|
All Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Salary
|
|
Bonus
|
|
Awards
|
|
Awards
|
|
Compensation
|
|
Earnings
|
|
Compensation
|
|
Total
|
Name and Principal Position
|
|
Year
|
|
($)
|
|
($)
|
|
(1)($)
|
|
(2)($)
|
|
(3)($)
|
|
($)
|
|
(4)($)
|
|
($)
|
|
Steven M. Shindler(5)
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
711,250
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
1,647,179
|
|
|
|
3,023,735
|
|
|
|
599,040
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
198,201
|
|
|
|
6,179,405
|
|
Chief executive officer
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
657,438
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
2,111,938
|
|
|
|
1,851,556
|
|
|
|
553,480
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
74,690
|
|
|
|
5,249,102
|
|
Gokul Hemmady(6)
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
247,179
|
|
|
|
200,000
|
|
|
|
323,532
|
|
|
|
229,292
|
|
|
|
167,232
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
10,867
|
|
|
|
1,178,102
|
|
Vice president and
chief financial officer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Byron R. Siliezar(7)
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
316,212
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
(38,168
|
)
|
|
|
307,384
|
|
|
|
-0-
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
12,956
|
|
|
|
598,384
|
|
Vice president of
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
363,203
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
874,163
|
|
|
|
865,328
|
|
|
|
229,369
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
8,800
|
|
|
|
2,340,863
|
|
business development
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lodewijk van Gemert
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
426,899
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
1,191,145
|
|
|
|
1,724,662
|
|
|
|
269,594
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
4,285
|
|
|
|
3,616,585
|
|
President and
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
406,571
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
1,553,653
|
|
|
|
1,215,286
|
|
|
|
256,757
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
1,306
|
|
|
|
3,433,573
|
|
chief operating officer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jose Felipe
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
381,486
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
564,937
|
|
|
|
1,164,590
|
|
|
|
218,136
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
468,549
|
|
|
|
2,797,698
|
|
President, Nextel
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
363,320
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
682,063
|
|
|
|
818,549
|
|
|
|
209,587
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
423,711
|
|
|
|
2,497,230
|
|
Mercosur
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Peter Foyo
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
363,125
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
605,784
|
|
|
|
1,263,881
|
|
|
|
180,075
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
238,952
|
|
|
|
2,651,817
|
|
President, Nextel
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
345,000
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
808,414
|
|
|
|
885,478
|
|
|
|
183,750
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
279,473
|
|
|
|
2,502,115
|
|
Mexico
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The amounts in this column reflect the dollar amount of
compensation expense recognized during the applicable year for
financial reporting purposes under SFAS 123R with respect
to awards of restricted common stock held by each of the named
executive officers, but disregarding estimated forfeitures
related to service-based vesting conditions. We value restricted
stock awards at the date of grant based on the number of shares
subject to the grant multiplied by the closing price of our
common stock on the date of grant. Additional information
regarding the awards of restricted common stock to the named
executive officers in 2007 is included in the Grants of
Plan-Based Awards table below. The amount in this column listed
for Mr. Siliezar represents expense recognized in 2006
which the Company was able to reverse in 2007 when
Mr. Siliezar resigned his position with the company and his
unvested restricted stock grant was forfeited. |
|
(2) |
|
The amounts in this column reflect the dollar amount of
compensation expense recognized during the applicable year for
financial reporting purposes under SFAS 123R with respect
to awards of options to purchase shares of common stock held by
each of the named executives, but disregarding estimated
forfeitures related to service-based vesting conditions. The
valuation assumptions used in determining these amounts are
described in footnote 12 to our consolidated financial
statements included in our 2007 annual report on
Form 10-K.
Additional information regarding the awards of options to
purchase common stock to the named executive officers in 2007 is
included in the Grants of Plan-Based Awards table below. |
22
|
|
|
(3) |
|
The amounts in this column represent the bonus that we paid
under our annual incentive compensation plan. The bonus is
predicated on a predetermined percentage of base salary based on
achievement of operating unit and/or consolidated performance
goals. Additional information on this non-equity incentive plan
compensation is included in our Compensation Discussion
and Analysis section above. Mr. Siliezar was not
entitled to receive a bonus award for 2007 under our annual
incentive compensation plan because he was no longer employed by
the Company on the date the bonus was paid. |
|
(4) |
|
Except as described below, the dollar value of perquisites and
other personal benefits received by each of the named executive
officers did not exceed $10,000. |
|
|
|
For Mr. Shindler, the amount in this column includes an
employer 401(k) matching contribution in the amount of $9,000,
payments made with respect to routine comprehensive annual
physical examinations and related expenses, $174,000 relating to
the personal use of our corporate aircraft and $11,731 of
reimbursements for taxes relating to imputed income for personal
use of our corporate aircraft. Personal use of our corporate
aircraft is valued based on the aggregate incremental cost to us
on a fiscal-year basis. The incremental cost to us of personal
use of our corporate aircraft is calculated based on our
variable operating cost, which includes the cost of fuel,
trip-related maintenance, crew travel, landing and ramp fees and
other smaller variable costs. Because our corporate aircraft is
used primarily for business travel, fixed costs that do not
change based on usage, such as pilot salaries and aircraft
purchase and lease costs, are excluded from this calculation.
The amount attributable to personal use of our corporate
aircraft relates to use of the aircraft by Mr. Shindler
pursuant to his compensation arrangements, which allow him to
use of the aircraft solely for purposes of commuting between his
home and our headquarters, and is independent of the use of the
corporate aircraft by Mr. Shindler pursuant to the charter
arrangements described below in Certain Relationships and
Related Transactions Executive Charters of Company
Aircraft. |
|
|
|
For Mr. Hemmady, the amount in this column includes an
employer 401(k) matching contribution in the amount of $4,020
and payments made for his relocation in the amount of $6,847. |
|
|
|
For Mr. Siliezar, the amount in this column includes an
employer 401(k) matching contribution in the amount of $9,000
and payments made with respect to a routine comprehensive annual
physical examination. |
|
|
|
For Mr. Felipe, the amount in this column includes an
employer 401(k) matching contribution in the amount of $9,000, a
foreign services differential, tax gross ups including amounts
payable with respect to Medicare taxes due with respect to the
foreign service related payments and personal travel costs
reimbursements to Mr. Felipe as follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign Services
|
|
Tax
|
|
Personal
|
|
|
Year
|
|
Differential
|
|
Gross-Up
|
|
Travel Costs
|
|
Total
|
|
2007
|
|
$
|
324,000
|
|
|
$
|
65,063
|
|
|
$
|
70,486
|
|
|
$
|
468,549
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For Mr. Foyo, the amount in this column includes an
employer 401(k) matching contribution in the amount of $9,000, a
housing allowance, utilities reimbursements, a foreign services
differential, tax gross ups including amounts payable with
respect to Medicare taxes due with respect to the foreign
service related payments and personal travel costs
reimbursements to Mr. Foyo as follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Housing
|
|
Foreign Services
|
|
Tax
|
|
Personal
|
|
|
Year
|
|
and Utilities
|
|
Differential
|
|
Gross-Up
|
|
Travel Costs
|
|
Total
|
|
2007
|
|
$
|
95,514
|
|
|
$
|
77,210
|
|
|
$
|
24,447
|
|
|
$
|
32,781
|
|
|
$
|
238,952
|
|
|
|
|
(5) |
|
On February 11, 2008, Mr. Shindler surrendered,
without consideration, options to purchase 50,000 shares of
common stock that were granted to him on April 25, 2007.
The surrender of options was made by Mr. Shindler in
connection with his transition to a new position as Executive
Chairman of NII Holdings, Inc. |
|
(6) |
|
Mr. Hemmady was hired to serve as our Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer effective May 21, 2007 and received
$200,000 as a sign-on bonus. |
|
(7) |
|
Mr. Siliezar stepped down as Chief Financial Officer
effective May 21, 2007 to become our Vice President of
Business Development. Mr. Siliezar resigned as Vice
President of Business Development effective November 9,
2007. |
23
Supplemental
Discussion of Compensation
All compensation that we pay to our named executive officers,
other than the foreign service differential and related payments
which is set pursuant to letter agreements with
Messrs. Felipe and Foyo, is determined as described above
in our Compensation Discussion and Analysis section.
We made the awards of restricted stock and grants of stock
options under our 2004 Incentive Compensation Plan.
The table above presents the fair value of option grants under
SFAS 123R, as determined based on the Black-Scholes-Merton
option-pricing model and the stated assumptions. The
Black-Scholes-Merton option-pricing model, however, was
developed for use in estimating the fair value of traded options
that have no vesting restrictions and are fully transferable. In
addition, option-pricing models such as the Black-Scholes-Merton
model require the input of highly subjective assumptions,
including the expected stock price volatility. We hired an
independent consulting firm with expertise in this area to
review our assumptions, methodology and calculations. The
assumptions represent our best estimates, but these estimates
involve inherent uncertainties and the application of management
judgment. Consequently, there is a risk that our estimates of
the fair values of our stock option awards on the grant dates
may bear little resemblance to the actual values realized upon
the exercise, expiration, early termination or forfeiture of
those stock option awards in the future. Certain stock option
awards may expire worthless or otherwise result in zero
intrinsic value as compared to the fair values originally
estimated on the grant date and reported in our financial
statements. Alternatively, value may be realized from the stock
option award that is significantly in excess of the fair values
originally estimated on the grant date and reported in our
financial statements. Additionally, application of alternative
assumptions could produce significantly different estimates of
the fair value of stock option awards and consequently, the
related amounts recognized in the consolidated statements of
operations. Currently, there is no market-based mechanism or
other practical application to verify the reliability and
accuracy of the estimates from option-pricing valuation models,
such as Black-Scholes-Merton, nor is there a means to compare
and adjust the estimates to actual values. Although the fair
value of stock option awards is determined in accordance with
SFAS 123R and Staff Accounting Bulletin Topic 14
(SAB 107) using the Black-Scholes-Merton
option-pricing model, the fair value may not be indicative of
the fair value observed in a willing buyer/willing seller market
transaction. Because employee stock options have characteristics
significantly different from those of traded options, and
because changes in the subjective input assumptions can
materially affect the fair value estimate, we believe that the
existing models do not necessarily provide a reliable single
measure of the fair value of the stock options granted to the
named executive officers.
We do not have any pension plans or nonqualified deferred
compensation plans.
24
Grants
of Plan-Based Awards Table
In the table below and discussion that follows it, we summarize
the grants of stock options and stock awards to each of the
named executive officers during 2007. Our non-equity incentive
bonus plan adopted for 2007 does not provide for payouts in
fiscal years after 2007, and we historically have not issued any
performance-based equity incentive plan awards.
Grants of
Plan-Based Awards
Fiscal Year 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Other
|
|
|
All Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
|
Option
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Awards:
|
|
|
Awards:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated Future Payouts
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Exercise or
|
|
|
Grant Date Fair
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Under Non-Equity Incentive
|
|
|
Shares of
|
|
|
Securities
|
|
|
Base Price
|
|
|
Value of Stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Plan Awards(1)
|
|
|
Stock or
|
|
|
Underlying
|
|
|
of Option
|
|
|
and Option
|
|
Name
|
|
Grant Date
|
|
|
Threshold($)
|
|
|
Target($)
|
|
|
Maximum($)
|
|
|
Units(#)
|
|
|
Options(#)
|
|
|
Awards($/sh)
|
|
|
Awards(2)($)
|
|
|
Steven M. Shindler
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
460,800
|
|
|
|
576,000
|
|
|
|
691,200
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4/25/07
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
185,000
|
(3)
|
|
|
78.30
|
|
|
|
5,457,500
|
|
Gokul Hemmady
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
128,640
|
|
|
|
160,800
|
|
|
|
192,960
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5/21/07
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,577,400
|
|
|
|
|
5/21/07
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50,000
|
|
|
|
78.87
|
|
|
|
1,496,000
|
|
Byron R. Siliezar
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
147,032
|
|
|
|
183,790
|
|
|
|
220,548
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4/25/07
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40,000
|
(4)
|
|
|
78.30
|
|
|
|
1,180,000
|
|
Lodewijk van Gemert
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
207,380
|
|
|
|
259,225
|
|
|
|
311,070
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4/25/07
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
70,000
|
|
|
|
78.30
|
|
|
|
2,065,000
|
|
Jose Felipe
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
154,433
|
|
|
|
193,041
|
|
|
|
231,649
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4/25/07
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50,000
|
|
|
|
78.30
|
|
|
|
1,475,000
|
|
Peter Foyo
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
147,000
|
|
|
|
183,750
|
|
|
|
220,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4/25/07
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
55,000
|
|
|
|
78.30
|
|
|
|
1,622,500
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The amounts reflect the potential range of payouts for the 2007
Bonus Plan. The potential range of payouts for Mr. Hemmady
reflects the prorated amount based on his service from May 2007
through December 2007. Mr. Siliezar was not entitled to
receive a payout under the 2007 Bonus Plan because he was no
longer employed by the Company on the date the bonus was paid.
The actual amounts of the payments made under this plan to the
named executive officers are reflected in the Non-Equity
Incentive Plan Compensation column of the Summary Compensation
Table. |
|
(2) |
|
The amounts in this column reflect the fair market value of the
restricted stock awards and option awards on the date of grant
determined under SFAS 123R, but disregarding estimated
forfeitures related to service-based vesting conditions. We
value restricted stock awards at the date of grant based on the
number of shares subject to the grant multiplied by the closing
price of our common stock on the date of grant. We determined
the fair market value of option awards based on the
Black-Sholes-Merton option pricing model. The valuation
assumptions used in determining these amounts are described in
footnote 12 to our consolidated financial statements included in
our 2007 annual report on
Form 10-K. |
|
(3) |
|
On February 11, 2008, Mr. Shindler surrendered,
without consideration, options to purchase 50,000 shares of
common stock that were granted to him on April 25, 2007.
The surrender of options was made by Mr. Shindler in
connection with his transition to a new position as Executive
Chairman of NII Holdings, Inc. The share amounts above do not
reflect that surrender. |
|
(4) |
|
Mr. Siliezar resigned effective November 9, 2007. As a
result, the options granted to him on April 25, 2007, which
were not vested as of the date of his resignation, expired on
that date in accordance with the terms of the relevant grants. |
Supplemental
Discussion of Awards
As disclosed in the table above, on April 25, 2007 we
granted options to acquire shares of our common stock to each of
the named executive officers other than Mr. Hemmady and on
May 21, 2007 we granted options to acquire shares of our
common stock to Mr. Hemmady in connection with the
commencement of his employment with the Company. The
25
exercise price for the options listed was the closing price of a
share of our common stock, as reported on the Nasdaq Global
Select Market, on the date of grant. The exercise price may be
paid in cash, in shares of our common stock valued at fair
market value on the date of exercise or pursuant to a cashless
exercise procedure under which the optionee provides irrevocable
instructions to a brokerage firm to sell the purchased shares
and to remit to us, out of the sale proceeds, an amount equal to
the exercise price plus all required tax withholding and other
deductions. The right to exercise the options granted will vest
at a rate of 25% of the aggregate number of shares of our common
stock covered by such options on each of the first four
successive anniversary dates of the date of grant. The options
expire ten years from the date of grant. An earlier expiration
date may apply in the event of the optionees termination
of employment, retirement, death or disability.
In addition, on May 21, 2007 we granted an award of
restricted common stock to Mr. Hemmady in connection with
the commencement of his employment with the Company. That award
will vest in its entirety on May, 21, 2010, the third
anniversary of the grant date.
For information on how we determined the number of restricted
stock awards and stock option grants for 2007, see the
Compensation Discussion and Analysis section above.
Outstanding
Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End Table
The equity awards reflected in the table below include the
number and value of stock options and shares of restricted stock
that remain outstanding as of December 31, 2007.
Outstanding
Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Option Awards
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock Awards
|
|
|
Securities
|
|
Securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Market Value of
|
|
|
Underlying
|
|
Underlying
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares or
|
|
Shares or
|
|
|
Unexercised
|
|
Unexercised
|
|
|
|
|
|
Units of
|
|
Units of
|
|
|
Options
|
|
Options
|
|
Option
|
|
Option
|
|
Stock That
|
|
Stock That
|
|
|
(#)
|
|
(#)
|
|
Exercise
|
|
Expiration
|
|
Have Not
|
|
Have Not
|
Name
|
|
Exercisable
|
|
Unexercisable
|
|
Price($)
|
|
Date
|
|
Vested(#)
|
|
Vested(1)($)
|
|
Steven M. Shindler
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100,000
|
(2)
|
|
|
18.97
|
|
|
|
4/28/2014
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
150,000
|
(3)
|
|
|
26.20
|
|
|
|
4/27/2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32,500
|
(4)
|
|
|
97,500
|
(4)
|
|
|
60.77
|
|
|
|
4/26/2016
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
185,000
|
(5)
|
|
|
78.30
|
|
|
|
4/25/2017
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
70,000
|
(6)
|
|
|
3,382,400
|
|
Gokul Hemmady
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50,000
|
(7)
|
|
|
78.87
|
|
|
|
5/21/2017
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,000
|
(8)
|
|
|
966,400
|
|
Byron R. Siliezar(9)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lodewijk van Gemert
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
65,000
|
(2)
|
|
|
18.97
|
|
|
|
4/28/2014
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100,000
|
(3)
|
|
|
26.20
|
|
|
|
4/27/2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,250
|
(4)
|
|
|
63,750
|
(4)
|
|
|
60.77
|
|
|
|
4/26/2016
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
70,000
|
(5)
|
|
|
78.30
|
|
|
|
4/25/2017
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50,000
|
(6)
|
|
|
2,416,000
|
|
Jose Felipe
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40,000
|
(2)
|
|
|
18.97
|
|
|
|
4/28/2014
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
75,000
|
(3)
|
|
|
26.20
|
|
|
|
4/27/2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41,250
|
(4)
|
|
|
60.77
|
|
|
|
4/26/2016
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50,000
|
(5)
|
|
|
78.30
|
|
|
|
4/25/2017
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,000
|
(6)
|
|
|
1,208,000
|
|
Peter Foyo
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50,000
|
(2)
|
|
|
18.97
|
|
|
|
4/28/2014
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
75,000
|
(3)
|
|
|
26.20
|
|
|
|
4/27/2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,750
|
(4)
|
|
|
41,250
|
(4)
|
|
|
60.77
|
|
|
|
4/26/2016
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
55,000
|
(5)
|
|
|
78.30
|
|
|
|
4/25/2017
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,000
|
(6)
|
|
|
1,208,000
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The market value of the restricted stock is based on the $48.32
closing price of a share of our common stock, as reported on the
Nasdaq Global Select Market on December 31, 2007. |
26
|
|
|
(2) |
|
The original grants provided for vesting in equal annual amounts
on the four anniversary dates following the date of grant with
the first three installments having vested on April 28,
2005, April 28, 2006 and April 28, 2007. The remaining
options reflected in this column will vest on April 28,
2008 (the fourth anniversary of the grant date). |
|
(3) |
|
The original grants provided for vesting in equal annual amounts
on the four anniversary dates following the date of grant with
the first two installments having vested on April 27, 2006
and April 27, 2007. The remaining options reflected in this
column will vest in equal amounts on April 27, 2008 and
April 27, 2009 (the third and fourth anniversary of the
grant date, respectively). |
|
(4) |
|
The original grants provided for vesting in equal annual amounts
on the four anniversary dates following the date of grant with
the first installment having vested on April 26, 2007. The
remaining options reflected in this column will vest in equal
amounts on April 26, 2008, April 26, 2009 and
April 26, 2010 (the second, third and fourth anniversary of
the grant date, respectively). |
|
(5) |
|
These options will vest at a rate of 25% per year from the grant
date, with vesting dates of April 25, 2008, April 25,
2009, April 25, 2010 and April 25, 2011. On
February 11, 2008, Mr. Shindler surrendered, without
consideration, options to purchase 50,000 shares of common
stock that were granted to him on April 25, 2007. The
surrender of options was made by Mr. Shindler in connection
with his transition to a new position as Executive Chairman of
NII Holdings, Inc. The share amounts above do not reflect that
surrender. |
|
(6) |
|
Fifty percent of these shares of restricted stock will vest on
April 26, 2009, the third anniversary of the grant date,
and the remaining 50% of these shares of restricted stock will
vest on April 26, 2010, the fourth anniversary of the grant
date. |
|
(7) |
|
These options will vest at a rate of 25% per year from the grant
date, with vesting dates of May 21, 2008, May 21,
2009, May 21, 2010 and May 21, 2011. |
|
(8) |
|
These shares of restricted stock will vest on May 21, 2010,
the third anniversary of the grant date. |
|
(9) |
|
Mr. Siliezar resigned effective November 9, 2007. As a
result, all outstanding restricted shares and options granted to
him that were not vested as of the date of his resignation
expired on that date in accordance with the terms of the
relevant grants. Mr. Siliezar had no vested and unexercised
options on the date of his resignation. |
Option
Exercises and Stock Vested Table
In the table below, we list information on the exercise of
options and the vesting of restricted stock during the year
ended December 31, 2007.
Option
Exercises and Stock Vested
Fiscal Year 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Option Awards
|
|
|
Stock Awards
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
|
Acquired on
|
|
|
Realized on
|
|
|
Acquired on
|
|
|
Realized on
|
|
Name
|
|
Exercise(#)
|
|
|
Exercise(1)($)
|
|
|
Vesting(#)
|
|
|
Vesting(2)($)
|
|
|
Steven M. Shindler
|
|
|
175,000
|
|
|
|
9,798,833
|
|
|
|
200,000
|
|
|
|
16,072,000
|
|
Gokul Hemmady
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Byron R. Siliezar
|
|
|
100,000
|
|
|
|
5,509,375
|
|
|
|
100,000
|
|
|
|
8,036,000
|
|
Lodewijk van Gemert
|
|
|
115,000
|
|
|
|
6,520,076
|
|
|
|
150,000
|
|
|
|
12,054,000
|
|
Jose Felipe
|
|
|
91,250
|
|
|
|
4,509,521
|
|
|
|
60,000
|
|
|
|
4,821,600
|
|
Peter Foyo
|
|
|
87,500
|
|
|
|
4,964,186
|
|
|
|
80,000
|
|
|
|
6,428,800
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The value realized on exercise is calculated as the number of
shares acquired on exercise multiplied by the difference between
the exercise price of an exercised option and the closing price
of the shares on the date of exercise. |
|
(2) |
|
The value realized on vesting is calculated as the number of
shares vested multiplied by the closing price of the shares on
the day immediately preceding the date of vesting. |
27
Equity
Compensation Plan Information
The following table sets forth information as of
December 31, 2007, with respect to compensation plans under
which shares of our common stock are authorized for issuance.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of Securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
To Be Issued Upon
|
|
Weighted Average
|
|
Number of Securities
|
|
|
Exercise of
|
|
Exercise Price of
|
|
Remaining Available For
|
|
|
Outstanding Options,
|
|
Outstanding Options,
|
|
Future Issuance Under Equity
|
Plan Category
|
|
Warrants and Rights
|
|
Warrants and Rights
|
|
Compensation Plans(1)
|
|
Equity compensation plans approved by stockholders
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 Incentive Compensation Plan
|
|
|
10,579,928
|
|
|
$
|
50.48
|
|
|
|
20,494,643
|
(2)
|
Equity compensation plans not approved by stockholders
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2002 Management Incentive Plan(3)
|
|
|
28,585
|
|
|
$
|
0.47
|
|
|
|
|
(4)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
10,608,513
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,494,643
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Amounts exclude any securities to be issued upon exercise of
outstanding options, warrants and rights. |
|
(2) |
|
The 2004 Incentive Compensation Plan permits the grant of one or
more of the following awards: options, stock appreciation rights
(SAR), stock awards, performance stock awards,
incentive awards and stock units. The number of shares
authorized to be issued under the 2004 Incentive Compensation
Plan will be reduced by 1 share of common stock for each
share of common stock issued pursuant to a stock option or SAR
and by
11/2
shares of common stock for each share of common stock issued
pursuant to all other awards. |
|
(3) |
|
The 2002 Management Incentive Plan, which we refer to as the
2002 MIP, was adopted pursuant to the Revised Third Amended
Joint Plan of Reorganization and became effective on
November 12, 2002. The 2002 MIP provides equity and
equity-related incentives to our directors, officers or key
employees and consultants up to a maximum of
13,333,332 shares of common stock subject to adjustments.
The 2002 MIP is administered by our Board of Directors. The 2002
MIP provides for the issuance of options for the purchase of
shares of common stock, as well as grants of shares of common
stock where the recipients rights may vest upon the
fulfillment of specified performance targets or the
recipients continued employment by us for a specified
period, or in which the recipients rights may be subject
to forfeiture upon a termination of employment. The 2002 MIP
also provides for the issuance to our non-affiliate directors,
officers or key employees and consultants of stock appreciation
rights whose value is tied to the market value per share, as
defined in the 2002 MIP, of the common stock, and performance
units which entitle the recipients to payments upon the
attainment of specified performance goals. The 2002 MIP provides
for the issuance of incentive stock options in compliance with
Section 422 of the Internal Revenue Code, as well as
non-qualified options which do not purport to
qualify for treatment under Section 422. All options issued
under the 2002 MIP vest as determined by the Board of Directors. |
|
(4) |
|
In 2004, the Board of Directors recommended, and the
stockholders approved, the 2004 Incentive Compensation Plan to
succeed (4) the 2002 MIP. As a result, no shares are
available for any future awards or grants under the 2002 MIP and
any unissued shares under the 2002 MIP became subject to the
2004 Incentive Compensation Plan. |
Potential
Payments under Severance Plans
We have arrangements with each of our named executive officers
under our Change of Control Severance Plan that provide for
payments and benefits if an executive officers employment
is terminated in connection with the occurrence of certain
events involving a change in control. In addition, we have an
obligation to make payments and provide certain benefits to our
named executive officers under our Severance Plan and 2004
Incentive Compensation Plan resulting from termination of
employment upon the occurrence of certain events. The following
is a summary of the payments that we or our successor may make
under each of these arrangements.
28
Payments
upon Termination of Employment
Each of our named executive officers is covered by our Change of
Control Severance Plan and our Severance Plan. The change of
control plan provides for the payment of certain benefits if an
executive officers employment is terminated by the company
without cause or by the executive officer for good reason in
connection with a change of control. No benefits are required to
be paid unless the executive officers employment is
terminated. The named executive officers are also entitled to
severance benefits if their employment is terminated by the
company in specified circumstances under the Severance Plan.
Although the benefits under the Severance Plan apply without
regard to whether any change of control has occurred or is
pending, the benefits paid under the change of control plan are
offset by any amounts paid under the Severance Plan. Each of the
named executive officers has also received awards of stock
options and restricted stock under the 2004 Incentive
Compensation Plan, which contains provisions that may accelerate
the vesting of awards made to a named executive officer if we
terminate the executive officers employment with us or if
the executive officer terminates his or her employment with us
for good reason in connection with a change of control.
Except as noted below, we otherwise have not entered into any
employment agreements or other arrangements that provide for
benefits in connection with a termination of employment of our
named executive officers. In the case of Mr. Felipe, we
have agreed that he is entitled to benefits under the Severance
Plan if he is involuntarily terminated other than for cause or
if he resigns as a result of a substantial change to his duties
and responsibilities or residence, and that his severance
benefit in those circumstances will be a minimum of one year of
base salary and bonus, unless application of the Severance Plan
would result in the payment of a greater amount. We have also
agreed to provide Mr. Felipe with medical insurance for one
year following his termination in those circumstances.
29
The following table shows the estimated amount of the payments
to be made to each of the named executive officers who continued
to be employed by us as of December 31, 2008 upon
termination of their employment in connection with a change of
control under the Change of Control Severance Plan, their
involuntary termination under the Severance Plan or upon their
termination in connection with their death or disability. For
purposes of calculating the value of the benefits, we have
assumed that the triggering event for payment occurred under
each of the arrangements as of December 31, 2007. The
footnotes to the table contain an explanation of the assumptions
made by us to calculate the payments, and the discussion that
follows the table provides additional details on these
arrangements.
Potential
Payments upon Termination of Employment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Severance
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
|
|
Termination Event(1)
|
|
Payment(2)($)
|
|
|
Bonus(3)($)
|
|
|
Payments(4)($)
|
|
|
Awards(5)($)
|
|
|
Total(6)($)
|
|
|
Change of Control Plan Termination by Executive
for Good Reason(7)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Steven M. Shindler
|
|
|
1,800,000
|
|
|
|
2,016,000
|
|
|
|
41,294
|
|
|
|
9,635,400
|
|
|
|
13,492,694
|
|
Gokul Hemmady
|
|
|
1,000,000
|
|
|
|
747,288
|
|
|
|
753,336
|
|
|
|
966,400
|
|
|
|
3,467,024
|
|
Lodewijk van Gemert
|
|
|
1,080,105
|
|
|
|
907,288
|
|
|
|
41,294
|
|
|
|
6,535,750
|
|
|
|
8,564,437
|
|
Jose Felipe
|
|
|
772,164
|
|
|
|
579,123
|
|
|
|
32,391
|
|
|
|
4,041,000
|
|
|
|
5,424,678
|
|
Peter Foyo
|
|
|
735,000
|
|
|
|
551,250
|
|
|
|
41,248
|
|
|
|
4,334,500
|
|
|
|
5,661,998
|
|
Change of Control Plan Termination by the Company
Without Cause(8)(9)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Steven M. Shindler
|
|
|
1,800,000
|
|
|
|
2,016,000
|
|
|
|
41,294
|
|
|
|
9,635,400
|
|
|
|
13,492,694
|
|
Gokul Hemmady
|
|
|
1,000,000
|
|
|
|
747,288
|
|
|
|
753,336
|
|
|
|
966,400
|
|
|
|
3,467,024
|
|
Lodewijk van Gemert
|
|
|
1,080,105
|
|
|
|
907,288
|
|
|
|
41,294
|
|
|
|
6,535,750
|
|
|
|
8,564,437
|
|
Jose Felipe
|
|
|
772,164
|
|
|
|
579,123
|
|
|
|
32,391
|
|
|
|
4,041,000
|
|
|
|
5,424,678
|
|
Peter Foyo
|
|
|
735,000
|
|
|
|
551,250
|
|
|
|
41,248
|
|
|
|
4,334,500
|
|
|
|
5,661,998
|
|
Severance Plan Involuntary Termination(10)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Steven M. Shindler
|
|
|
720,000
|
|
|
|
576,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,296,000
|
|
Gokul Hemmady
|
|
|
400,000
|
|
|
|
240,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
640,000
|
|
Lodewijk van Gemert
|
|
|
432,032
|
|
|
|
259,225
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
691,257
|
|
Jose Felipe
|
|
|
386,082
|
|
|
|
193,041
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
579,123
|
|
Peter Foyo
|
|
|
367,500
|
|
|
|
183,750
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
551,250
|
|
Death, Disability or Retirement
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Steven M. Shindler
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,635,400
|
|
|
|
9,635,400
|
|
Gokul Hemmady
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
966,400
|
|
|
|
966,400
|
|
Lodewijk van Gemert
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,535,750
|
|
|
|
6,535,750
|
|
Jose Felipe
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,041,000
|
|
|
|
4,041,000
|
|
Peter Foyo
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,334,500
|
|
|
|
4,334,500
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
No payments are required to be made to any named executive
officer under the Change of Control Severance Plan or the
Severance Plan if the executive is terminated for cause or if
the executive voluntarily terminates his employment (other than
for good reason in connection with a change of control under the
Change of Control Plan). Mr. Siliezar voluntarily
terminated his employment effective November 9, 2007.
Accordingly, no payments were made to him under either the
Change of Control Severance Plan or the Severance Plan. |
|
(2) |
|
The Severance Payment under the Change of Control Severance Plan
is 250% of the executives annual base salary and annual
target bonus percentage on the day immediately preceding the
change of control in the case |
30
|
|
|
|
|
of Messrs. Shindler, Hemmady and van Gemert and 200% of
such amounts in the case of Messrs. Felipe and Foyo.
Amounts included in this column with respect to the Change of
Control Severance Plan reflect the portion of the severance
payment attributable to base salary. Amounts attributable to the
target bonus are included in the Bonus column (See
note 3 below). The Severance Payment under the Severance Plan
for the named executive officers is 12 months of the named
executive officers annualized base salary at the time of
termination. If the severance payments under both plans apply,
the total severance payment will not exceed 250% or 200% of the
executives annual target bonus percentage, as applicable. |
|
(3) |
|
Under the Change of Control Severance Plan upon termination an
executive is entitled to receive as part of the severance
payment 250% of the executives annual target bonus
percentage on the day immediately preceding the change of
control in the case of Messrs. Shindler, Hemmady and van
Gemert and 200% of such amounts in the case of
Messrs. Felipe and Foyo. Amounts included in this column
with respect to the Change of Control Severance Plan reflect the
portion of the severance payment attributable to the target
bonus. The portion of the severance payment attributable to base
salary is included in the Severance Payment column
(See note 2 above). Under the Change of Control Plan, the
executive is also entitled to receive an amount equal to a
prorated portion of the annual bonus payment for the period
ending on the termination event. The Severance Plan also
provides for the payment of an amount equal to a prorated
portion of the annual bonus payment for the period ending on the
termination event for each named executive officer, payable when
bonuses are paid for the applicable plan year. Accordingly, the
amounts reflected in this column for each of the plans include
an amount equal to the target bonus for 2007 based on the
assumption that the executive was terminated on
December 31, 2007. |
|
(4) |
|
Other Payments include tax
gross-ups,
COBRA health insurance and outplacement counseling assistance
provided to each named executive officer under the Change of
Control Severance Plan. |
|
(5) |
|
The Equity Awards are the value (calculated in the case of
options as the difference between the exercise price of the
options and the market value of the related shares on
December 31, 2007 and in the case of restricted shares as
the value of shares on that date) of any awards granted under
the 2004 Plan whose vesting or payment are accelerated upon the
triggering event. We have assumed that the surviving entity has
elected not to assume, replace or convert any of the awards made
under the 2004 Plan. As described in more detail below, the 2004
Plan provides for the vesting of unvested options in specific
circumstances following a change of control of the Company. The
2004 Plan and the grant agreements made under that plan also
provide that outstanding and unvested options will vest upon an
employees death or disability or if the employee retires
at or after age 65 or at an earlier age with the consent of
the Compensation Committee. |
|
(6) |
|
In addition to the amounts specified in this column, upon
termination in each of the circumstances noted the executive
officer is entitled to receive base salary and cash or non-cash
benefits earned prior to the date of the named executive
officers termination including payments with respect to
accrued and unused vacation time and any reimbursements for the
reasonable and necessary business expenses incurred by the named
executive officer prior to termination. |
|
(7) |
|
Change of Control Plan Termination by Executive for
Good Reason describes the benefits payable to a named executive
officer if the named executive officer voluntarily terminates
his or her employment for good reason in connection with a
change of control as described below in Change of Control
Severance Plan. |
|
(8) |
|
Change of Control Plan Termination by the Company
Without Cause describes the benefits payable to a named
executive officer if the named executive officers
employment is terminated without cause by us or the surviving
entity in connection with a change of control as described below
in Change of Control Severance Plan. |
|
(9) |
|
In cases in which a named executive officers employment is
terminated by us or the surviving entity in connection with a
change of control, each named executive officer will be entitled
to a severance payment under both the Change of Control
Severance Plan and the Severance Plan; however, the amount due
under the Change of Control Severance Plan is reduced by any
payments made under the Severance Plan. |
|
(10) |
|
Severance Plan Involuntary Termination describes the
benefits payable to a named executive officer if the named
executive officers employment is terminated by us other
than in connection with a change of control under the
circumstances described below under Severance Plan. |
31
Change
of Control Severance Plan
The Change of Control Severance Plan provides that each named
executive officer will receive a payment if a change of control,
as defined below, occurs and he either is terminated without
cause or resigns for good reason. Messrs. Shindler, Hemmady
and van Gemert will be entitled to receive 250% of their annual
base salary and target bonus at the date of his termination upon
such an event, and Messrs. Felipe and Foyo will be entitled
to receive 200% of such amounts, all as provided in the plan.
Each named executive officer will be entitled to receive his
payment under the plan in a lump sum within thirty days
following his termination of employment.
We or the surviving entity will also pay the full premium cost
of continued health care coverage for each named executive
officer under the federal COBRA law in such a
termination. We will make the COBRA payments up to the lesser of
18 months or the time at which the named executive officer
is reemployed and is eligible to receive group health coverage
benefits under another employer-provided plan. The payments may
also cease for any of the reasons provided in the COBRA law.
In addition, in the event that any of the named executive
officers incur any legal, accounting or other fees and expenses
in a good faith effort to obtain benefits under the Change of
Control Severance Plan, we or the surviving entity will
reimburse the named executive officer for such reasonable
expenses. The named executive officer will be entitled to
receive a tax
gross-up
payment in the event that any payments made under the plan is
subject to the excise tax imposed by Section 4999 of the
Internal Revenue Code.
A change of control will be deemed to occur under the plan when:
|
|
|
|
|
we are merged, consolidated or reorganized into or with another
company, or we sell or otherwise transfer all or substantially
all of our assets to another company, and, as a result of either
transaction, less than a majority of the combined voting power
of the then outstanding securities of the resulting company
immediately after the transaction is held by the holders of our
voting securities immediately prior to the transaction;
|
|
|
|
the directors on our board as of July 23, 2003 or directors
elected subsequent to that date and whose nomination or election
was approved by a vote of at least two-thirds of the directors
on the board as of July 23, 2003 cease to be a majority of
our board;
|
|
|
|
our stockholders approve our complete liquidation or dissolution;
|
|
|
|
an individual, entity or group acquires beneficial ownership of
50% or more of our then outstanding shares or 50% of our then
outstanding voting power to vote in an election of our
directors, excluding any acquisition directly from us; or
|
|
|
|
our board approves a resolution stating that a change of control
has occurred.
|
A named executive officer will receive compensation under the
plan if:
|
|
|
|
|
he is terminated without cause within 18 months from a
change of control or prior to the change of control if he
reasonably demonstrates that the termination was at the request
of a third party attempting to effect a change of control or
otherwise in connection with a change of control; or
|
|
|
|
he voluntarily terminates his employment for good reason during
the 18 months following a change of control, defined as
when, after the change of control:
|
|
|
|
|
|
there was a significant and adverse change in or substantial
reduction of his duties, responsibilities and authority that he
held preceding the change of control;
|
|
|
|
his principal work location was moved to a location more than
40 miles away from his prior work location;
|
|
|
|
he was required to travel on business to a substantially greater
extent than prior to the change of control;
|
|
|
|
his salary, bonus or bonus potential were reduced or any other
significant adverse financial consequences occurred;
|
|
|
|
the benefits provided to him were significantly reduced in the
aggregate; or
|
|
|
|
we or any successor fail to assume or comply with the provisions
of the plan.
|
32
Severance
Plan
The Severance Plan provides payments to a named executive
officer in the event of an involuntary termination of
employment, which includes termination due to job elimination,
work force reductions, lack of work, a determination by us that
the executive officers contributions no longer meet the
needs of the business and any other reason determined by us. In
the case of Mr. Felipe, we have agreed that he is entitled
to benefits under the Severance Plan if he is involuntarily
terminated other than for cause or if he resigns as a result of
a substantial change to his duties and responsibilities or
residence. Under the Severance Plan, each of the named executive
officers will be entitled to a payment equal to 12 months
of his annualized base salary, not including any bonus,
incentive payments or commission payments. Each named executive
officer other than Mr. Felipe will also receive a pro rata
payment of his bonus based on the portion of the year that he
was employed by us. In the case of Mr. Felipe, we have
agreed that the payment with respect to his bonus will be for a
full year and will not be prorated. We will pay the bonus to the
named executive officer when we pay bonuses for the bonus plan
year, and such bonus will be based on the achievement level of
the named executive officers business unit for the year.
We will make a lump sum payment of the amount due under the
Severance Plan to each named executive officer. We reserve the
right to make the payments periodically for a period not to
exceed 24 months. In order to receive payments under the
Severance Plan, each named executive officer must:
|
|
|
|
|
return all of our property;
|
|
|
|
acknowledge that the payments to be received represent the full
amount that he is entitled to under the Severance Plan;
|
|
|
|
release any claims that he has or may have against us; and
|
|
|
|
in our discretion, agree not to compete with us for a certain
period.
|
2004
Incentive Compensation Plan
The 2004 Incentive Compensation Plan covers the grant of certain
incentives and awards, including stock options, stock
appreciation rights, stock, performance shares, incentive
awards, stock units and dividend equivalent rights, to our
employees, including the named executive officers. Under the
2004 Plan, if a change of control occurs and the incentives and
awards granted under the plan are not assumed by the surviving
entity, or the employee is terminated within a certain period
following a change of control, each outstanding award is treated
as explained below. A change of control under the 2004 Plan is
defined the same as in the Change of Control Severance Plan and
the same events that trigger payments to the executive officer
under the Change of Control Severance Plan trigger payments
under the 2004 Plan, both as described above.
|
|
|
|
|
Options. If the surviving entity assumes,
replaces or converts the options and the named executive officer
is terminated within 24 months under circumstances that
would trigger payment, the options will become fully
exercisable, vested or earned. If the options are not assumed,
replaced or converted, each option shall be fully exercisable
upon a change of control.
|
|
|
|
Stock Appreciation Rights. If the surviving
entity assumes, replaces or converts the stock appreciation
rights and the named executive officer is terminated within
24 months under circumstances that would trigger payment,
the stock appreciation rights will become fully exercisable,
vested or earned. If the stock appreciation rights are not
assumed, replaced or converted, each stock appreciation right
shall be fully exercisable upon a change of control. We have not
issued any stock appreciation rights.
|
|
|
|
Stock Awards. If the surviving entity assumes,
replaces or converts the stock award and the named executive
officer is terminated within 24 months under circumstances
that would trigger payment, the stock awards shall be
transferable and nonforfeitable. If the stock awards are not
assumed, replaced or converted, each stock award shall be
transferable and nonforfeitable upon a change of control.
|
|
|
|
Performance Shares. If the surviving entity
assumes, replaces or converts the performance shares and the
named executive officer is terminated within 24 months
under circumstances that would trigger payment, the performance
shares will become fully exercisable, vested or earned. If the
performance shares are not assumed, replaced or converted, the
named executive officer shall earn the performance shares
pro-rata based on the fraction of the performance period that
has elapsed before the change of control. We have not issued any
performance shares.
|
33
|
|
|
|
|
Incentive Awards. If the surviving entity does
not assume, replace or convert an incentive award, the named
executive officer shall have earned the pro-rata share of the
incentive award based on a fraction of the performance period
that has elapsed from the beginning of the performance period
until the change of control. We have not issued any incentive
awards.
|
The 2004 Plan provides that the administrator of the plan shall
determine what amounts will be payable to the named executive
officer upon death, disability or retirement in the agreement
under which awards are made under the plan.
DIRECTOR
COMPENSATION
Director
Compensation Table
In the table and discussion below, we summarize the compensation
paid to our non-employee directors in 2007. Mr. Dussek
became our chief executive officer on February 11, 2008.
The amounts included below for Mr. Dussek do not reflect
the compensation arrangements agreed to in connection with his
employment.
Director
Compensation
Fiscal Year 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Value and
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fees
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonqualified
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earned or
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
|
Option
|
|
|
Non-Equity
|
|
|
Deferred
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paid in
|
|
|
Awards
|
|
|
Awards
|
|
|
Incentive Plan
|
|
|
Compensation
|
|
|
All Other
|
|
|
|
|
Name
|
|
Cash($)
|
|
|
(1)($)
|
|
|
(2)($)
|
|
|
Compensation($)
|
|
|
Earnings
|
|
|
Compensation($)
|
|
|
Total($)
|
|
|
George A. Cope
|
|
|
90,000
|
|
|
|
101,099
|
|
|
|
189,546
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
380,645
|
|
John Donovan
|
|
|
85,000
|
|
|
|
101,099
|
|
|
|
178,037
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
364,136
|
|
Steven P. Dussek
|
|
|
115,000
|
|
|
|
101,099
|
|
|
|
177,747
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
393,846
|
|
Neal P. Goldman
|
|
|
100,000
|
|
|
|
86,974
|
|
|
|
194,707
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
381,681
|
|
Charles M. Herington
|
|
|
110,000
|
|
|
|
101,099
|
|
|
|
177,747
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
388,846
|
|
Carolyn Katz
|
|
|
130,000
|
|
|
|
101,099
|
|
|
|
177,747
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
408,846
|
|
Donald E. Morgan
|
|
|
85,000
|
|
|
|
101,099
|
|
|
|
180,047
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
366,146
|
|
John W. Risner
|
|
|
113,750
|
|
|
|
101,099
|
|
|
|
177,747
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
392,596
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The amounts in this column reflect the dollar amount of
compensation expense recognized in 2007 for financial reporting
purposes under SFAS 123R with respect to awards of
restricted common stock held by each director, but disregarding
estimated forfeitures related to service-based vesting
conditions. We value restricted stock awards at the date of
grant based on the number of shares subject to the grant
multiplied by the closing price of our common stock on the date
of grant. No shares of restricted stock were awarded to any of
our directors during 2007. |
|
|
|
The aggregate number of shares of restricted stock held by each
of the non-employee directors on December 31, 2007, and the
dollar value of such shares on such date based on the $48.32
closing price of a share of our common stock, as reported on the
Nasdaq Global Select Market on December 31, 2007 were as
follows: Mr. Cope 5,000, $241,600;
Mr. Donovan 5,000, $241,600;
Mr. Dussek 5,000, $241,600;
Mr. Goldman 5,000, $241,600;
Mr. Herington 5,000, $241,600;
Ms. Katz 5,000, $241,600;
Mr. Morgan 5,000, $241,600; and
Mr. Risner 5,000, $241,600. |
|
(2) |
|
The amounts in this column reflect the dollar amount of
compensation expense recognized in 2007 for financial reporting
purposes under SFAS 123R with respect to awards of options
to purchase common stock held by each of the named directors,
but disregarding estimated forfeitures related to service-based
vesting conditions. The valuation assumptions used in
determining these amounts are described in footnote 12 to our
financial statements included in our 2007 annual report on
Form 10-K.
Options to purchase the following number of shares were awarded
during 2007 to the non-employee directors: Mr. Cope,
8,500 shares; Mr. Donovan, 8,500 shares;
Mr. Dussek, 8,500 shares; Mr. Goldman,
8,500 shares; Mr. Herington, 8,500 shares;
Ms. Katz, 8,500 shares; Mr. Morgan,
8,500 shares; and Mr. Risner, 8,500 shares. The
grant date fair values of those stock option awards calculated
under SFAS 123R were as follows: Mr. Cope $250,750;
Mr. Donovan $250,750; Mr. Dussek $250,750;
Mr. Goldman $250,750; |
34
|
|
|
|
|
Mr. Herington $250,750; Ms. Katz $250,750;
Mr. Morgan $250,750; and Mr. Risner $250,750. The
aggregate number of shares of our common stock underlying
options held by each of the non-employee directors on
December 31, 2007 were as follows:
Mr. Cope 55,167; Mr. Donovan
33,500; Mr. Dussek 53,500;
Mr. Goldman 26,000;
Mr. Herington 58,500; Ms. Katz
70,500; Mr. Morgan 33,500; and
Mr. Risner 63,000. |
Fees
Payable to Non-Employee Directors
Each of our non-employee directors receives an annual retainer
of $70,000. In addition, our non-employee directors receive the
following annual retainer for serving on the following specified
committees:
|
|
|
|
|
$30,000 for serving as Chairman of the Audit Committee;
|
|
|
|
$25,000 for serving as Chairman of the Compensation Committee;
|
|
|
|
$25,000 for serving as a member (but not the Chairman) of the
Audit Committee;
|
|
|
|
$20,000 for serving as a member (but not the Chairman) of the
Compensation Committee;
|
|
|
|
$15,000 for serving as a member of the Finance
Committee; and
|
|
|
|
$15,000 for serving as a member of the Nominating Committee.
|
We pay all retainers in arrears in quarterly installments. We
also reimburse directors for travel expenses incurred in
connection with attending board, committee and stockholder
meetings and for other related expenses. We do not provide any
additional compensation to employees who serve as a director or
a committee member. Some of our directors and, in one case, a
family member of a director participate in our employee phone
program that pays the cost of mobile phone services.
Option
Grants and Restricted Stock Awards
We have adopted a policy of granting to each non-employee
director an option to purchase 15,000 shares of our common
stock upon becoming a director. These options will vest
331/3%
annually over a three year period and have an exercise price
equal to the closing price of a share of our common stock, as
reported on the Nasdaq Global Select Market, on the grant date.
We have also adopted a policy to grant to each non-employee
director an option to purchase shares of our common stock as of
the date of the annual meeting of our stockholders. In prior
years, these annual grants provided for options to purchase
10,000 shares of our common stock, but in 2007, the number
of shares subject to these grants was reduced from 10,000 to
8,500 due to the increase in the per option value of the grants.
These options will vest 25% annually over a four year period. On
April 25, 2007, we granted to each non-employee director
options to purchase 8,500 shares of our common stock at an
exercise price of $78.30 per share. The options will vest 25%
annually over a four year period in accordance with our policy.
In addition, we may grant additional stock options or restricted
stock to non-employee directors. No shares of restricted stock
were awarded to any of our directors during 2007.
Stock
Ownership Guidelines
On July 21, 2006, we adopted a director target ownership
program that requires our non-employee directors who receive
stock options
and/or
restricted stock awards to attain certain stock ownership
levels, and therefore maintain a vested interest in our equity
performance. Over a five-year period, the directors covered by
the program are expected to reach certain ownership levels based
on specific share targets. The current target is for our
non-employee directors to own a multiple of five times their
base retainer. Our current base retainer is $70,000, thus our
non-employee directors currently have a share ownership target
of $350,000. Although this share ownership target is not
required to be met for five years, as of December 31, 2007,
four of our seven non-employee directors (including
Mr. Dussek who was not an employee on that date) exceeded
that target. Under our policy, an increase in the base retainer
will result in an increase in the ownership requirement. The
types of stock ownership that qualify toward the ownership
requirement under our policy include direct stock ownership,
vested options where the exercise price is lower than the fair
market value of our common stock and vested restricted stock.
The penalty for non-compliance of our policy may include a
discontinuation of future grants of stock options or restricted
stock awards until the non-complying director becomes compliant.
35
SECURITIES
OWNERSHIP
Securities
Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners
The table below lists each person or group, as that term is used
in Section 13(d)(3) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
known by us to be the beneficial owner of more than 5% of our
outstanding common stock as of April 1, 2008.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount and Nature of
|
|
Percent of
|
Name and Address of Beneficial Owner
|
|
Beneficial Ownership
|
|
Class(1)
|
|
Wells Fargo & Company(2)
|
|
|
9,271,365
|
|
|
|
5.55
|
%
|
420 Montgomery Street
San Francisco, California 94104
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Based on 167,191,424 shares of common stock issued and
outstanding on April 1, 2008. |
|
(2) |
|
According to a Schedule 13/GA1 filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on February 1, 2008, Wells
Fargo & Company (Wells Fargo) reported
that it, through its wholly-owned subsidiaries, has sole power
to vote 7,820,776 shares and to dispose of
9,137,558 shares, and shared power to vote 700 shares
and to dispose of 2,200 shares of our common stock. |
Securities
Ownership of Management
In the table and the related footnotes below, we list, as of
April 1, 2008, except as otherwise stated, the amount and
percentage of shares of our common stock that are deemed under
the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission to be
beneficially owned by:
|
|
|
|
|
each person who served as one of our directors as of that date;
|
|
|
|
each of the named executive officers who currently are our
executive officers; and
|
|
|
|
all directors and executive officers as a group.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount and Nature of
|
|
|
Percent of
|
|
Name of Beneficial Owner
|
|
Beneficial Ownership(1)
|
|
|
Class(2)
|
|
|
George A. Cope
|
|
|
43,792
|
(3)(4)
|
|
|
*
|
|
Steven P. Dussek
|
|
|
126,925
|
(3)(4)
|
|
|
*
|
|
Jose Felipe
|
|
|
148,750
|
(3)(4)
|
|
|
*
|
|
Peter Foyo
|
|
|
172,250
|
(3)(4)
|
|
|
*
|
|
Neal P. Goldman
|
|
|
7,125
|
(3)(4)
|
|
|
*
|
|
Gokul Hemmady
|
|
|
32,500
|
(3)(4)
|
|
|
*
|
|
Charles M. Herington
|
|
|
72,035
|
(3)(4)
|
|
|
*
|
|
Carolyn Katz
|
|
|
78,125
|
(3)(4)
|
|
|
*
|
|
Donald E. Morgan
|
|
|
22,125
|
(3)(4)
|
|
|
*
|
|
John W. Risner
|
|
|
76,125
|
(3)(4)
|
|
|
*
|
|
Steven M. Shindler
|
|
|
442,130
|
(3)(4)
|
|
|
*
|
|
Lodewijk van Gemert
|
|
|
247,000
|
(3)(4)
|
|
|
*
|
|
All directors and executive officers as a group (21 persons)
|
|
|
2,162,902
|
(4)
|
|
|
1.28
|
%
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Less than one percent (1%) |
|
(1) |
|
Under the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission, a
person is deemed to be the beneficial owner of a security if
that person, directly or indirectly, has or shares the power to
direct the voting of the security or the power to dispose or
direct the disposition of the security. Accordingly, more than
one person may be deemed to be a beneficial owner of the same
securities. A person is also deemed to be a beneficial owner of
any securities if that person has the right to acquire
beneficial ownership within 60 days of the relevant date.
Unless otherwise indicated by footnote, the named individuals
have sole voting and investment power with respect to
beneficially owned shares of stock. |
|
(2) |
|
Based on 167,191,424 shares of common stock issued and
outstanding on April 1, 2008. |
36
|
|
|
(3) |
|
Includes shares of common stock that could be acquired through
the exercise of stock options within 60 days after
April 1, 2008 as follows: Mr. Cope 38,792;
Mr. Dussek 37,125; Mr. Felipe 103,750; Mr. Foyo
128,750; Mr. Goldman 2,125; Mr. Hemmady 12,500;
Mr. Herington 42,125; Mr. Morgan 17,125; Ms. Katz
54,125; Mr. Risner 46,625; Mr. Shindler 273,750; Mr.
van Gemert 175,000; and 1,424,792 held by all directors and
executive officers as a group. |
|
(4) |
|
Includes restricted shares of common stock as follows:
Mr. Cope 5,000; Mr. Dussek 65,000; Mr. Felipe
25,000; Mr. Foyo 25,000; Mr. Goldman 5,000;
Mr. Hemmady 20,000; Mr. Herington 5,000;
Mr. Morgan 5,000; Ms. Katz 5,000; Mr. Risner
5,000; Mr. Shindler 70,000; Mr. van Gemert 50,000; and
425,000 held by all directors and executive officers as a group. |
Section 16(a)
Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance
Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
requires our directors and executive officers, and persons who
own more than 10% of a registered class of our equity
securities, to file with the Securities and Exchange Commission
initial reports of beneficial ownership and reports of changes
in beneficial ownership of our equity securities. Based solely
upon a review of Forms 3, Forms 4 and Forms 5
furnished to us under
Rule 16a-3(e)
during 2007, and written representations of our directors and
executive officers that no Forms 5 were required to be
filed, we believe that all directors, executive officers and
beneficial owners of more than 10% of our common stock have
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on a timely
basis all reports required to be filed under Section 16(a)
of the Securities Exchange Act, except Steven M. Shindler
inadvertently filed late a report on Form 5 covering the
gift of common stock he made in December 2006.
CERTAIN
RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS
The Audit Committee of the Board of Directors reviews and
approves or ratifies transactions involving the Company and
related persons (directors and executive officers or
their immediate family members, or shareholders owning five
percent or more of our outstanding common stock) in accordance
with the requirements of The NASDAQ Stock Market. In determining
whether to approve or ratify a related party transaction, the
Audit Committee evaluates whether the transaction is in the best
interests of the Company taking into consideration all relevant
factors, including as applicable the Companys business
rationale for entering into the transaction and the fairness of
the transaction to the Company. The Audit Committee generally
seeks to consider and approve these transactions in advance
where practicable, but may also ratify them after the
transactions are entered into, particularly in instances where
the transactions are entered into in the ordinary course of
business or if the transaction is on terms that are consistent
with a policy previously approved by the Audit Committee or the
Board of Directors (as was the case with the transactions
involving the charter of our aircraft described below). In
instances where the transaction is subject to renewal or if the
Company has the right to terminate the relationship, the Audit
Committee expects to periodically monitor the transaction to
ensure that there are no changed circumstances that would render
it advisable for the Company to amend or terminate the
transaction.
Currently, the only related person transactions are the
transactions involving the charter of our aircraft, all as
described in more detail below. The Audit Committee approved
these arrangements.
Executive
Charters of Company Aircraft
Unlike many companies that own or lease a private aircraft, we
have implemented a policy that generally limits the use of
company owned or leased aircraft to company business purposes.
However, we do make the company aircraft available for charter
to employees at times when it is not in use for regular business
purposes through charter and leasing arrangements we have
entered into with independent entities that hold the required
FAA certifications to offer charter services. We use charter
revenue from our employees and from other sources as a way to
offset the operating costs of our aircraft. In the event a
charter is reserved by one of our employees, the charter rate is
the same as the established rate that applies to charters by
unrelated parties. In 2007, Mr. Shindler, our executive
chairman and former chief executive officer, chartered our
aircraft on several occasions at these commercial rates, which
were in excess of $5,000 per hour of use of the aircraft, and
paid us a total of $253,500 for such charters.
37
AUDIT
INFORMATION
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP has audited our consolidated
financial statements for the fiscal years ended
December 31, 2007 and December 31, 2006.
Fees Paid
to Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
The following information is furnished with respect to the fees
billed by our principal accountant for each of the last two
fiscal years.
Audit
Fees
The aggregate amount of fees billed and expected to be billed to
us by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP for professional services
rendered in connection with the audit of our annual financial
statements for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2007 and
December 31, 2006 were $9,185,000 and $10,228,000,
respectively.
Expenses billed to us by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP related to
the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006 were
approximately $298,000 and $278,000, respectively.
Audit fees consist of those fees rendered for the audit of our
annual consolidated financial statements, audit of the
effectiveness of internal controls over financial reporting,
review of financial statements included in our quarterly reports
and for services normally provided in connection with statutory
and regulatory filings or engagements, such as comfort letters
or attest services.
Audit
Related Fees
The aggregate amount of fees billed to us by
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP for professional services for
assurance and related services that are reasonably related to
the review of our financial statements and not reported under
the heading Audit Fees above for the fiscal years
ended December 31, 2007 and December 31, 2006 were
$99,000 and $82,000, respectively. Expenses billed to us by
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP related to the years ended
December 31, 2007 and 2006 were $0 and $251, respectively.
Tax
Fees
The aggregate amount of fees billed to us by
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP for professional services for tax
compliance, tax advice, tax planning, transfer pricing and
expatriate tax services for the fiscal years ended
December 31, 2007 and December 31, 2006 were $198,000
and $363,000, respectively. Tax fees consist of those fees
billed by the independent registered public accounting
firms tax department, except those services related to the
audit. Expenses billed to us by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
related to the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006 were
$0 and $400, respectively.
All
Other Fees
The aggregate amount of fees billed to us by
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP for services other than those
described above for the fiscal years ended December 31,
2007 and December 31, 2006 were $631,000 and $15,000,
respectively. All other fees are those fees billed for permitted
services other than the services described above. Expenses
billed to us by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP related to the year
ended December 31, 2007 was $15,000.
Audit
Committee Pre-Approval Policies and Procedures
It is the policy of the Audit Committee that our independent
registered public accounting firm may provide only those
services that have been pre-approved by the Audit Committee.
Unless a type of service to be provided by the independent
registered public accounting firm has received general
pre-approval, it requires specific pre- approval by the Audit
Committee. The term of any general pre-approval is eighteen
months from the date of pre-approval, unless the Audit Committee
or a related engagement letter specifically provides for a
different period. The Audit Committee will annually review and
pre-approve the services that may be provided by the independent
38
registered public accounting firm without obtaining specific
pre-approval. The Audit Committee has delegated its pre-approval
authority to Carolyn Katz, the chairwoman of the Audit Committee.
Requests or applications to provide services that require
specific approval by the Audit Committee must be submitted to
the Audit Committee by both the independent registered public
accounting firm and our controller, and must include a joint
statement as to whether, in their view, the request or
application is consistent with the Securities and Exchange
Commissions rules on auditor independence. In addition,
our Chief Financial Officer also must submit to the Audit
Committee requests or applications to provide services for
amounts anticipated to exceed $100,000.
Audit
Committee Report
No portion of this Audit Committee Report shall be deemed to be
incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities
Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended, through any general statement incorporating by
reference in its entirety the Proxy Statement in which this
report appears, except to the extent that we specifically
incorporate this report or a portion of it by reference. In
addition, this report shall not be deemed to be filed under
either the Securities Act or the Exchange Act.
The Board of Directors has adopted a written audit committee
charter, which is available on the Investor Relations link of
our website at the following address: www.nii.com. In
addition, all members of our Audit Committee are independent, as
defined in the Nasdaq listing standards.
The Audit Committee has reviewed and discussed our audited
consolidated financial statements with our management and
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, our independent registered public
accounting firm. The Audit Committee has also discussed with our
independent registered public accounting firm the matters
required to be discussed pursuant to Statement on Auditing
Standards No. 61, as amended, Communication with
Audit Committees.
The Audit Committee has received and reviewed the written
disclosures and the letter from PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
required by Independence Standards Board Standard No. 1,
Independence Discussions with Audit Committees, that
relates to the firms independence from our company and our
subsidiaries and has discussed with PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
their independence.
In addition, the Audit Committee met with senior management
periodically during 2007 and reviewed key initiatives and
programs aimed at strengthening the effectiveness of our
internal and disclosure control structure. As part of this
process, the Audit Committee continued to monitor the scope and
adequacy of our internal auditing program, reviewing staffing
levels and steps taken to implement recommended improvements in
internal procedures and controls. The Audit Committee also met
to discuss with senior management our disclosure controls and
procedures and the certifications by our chief executive officer
and our chief financial officer, which are required for certain
of our filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The
Audit Committee met privately with our independent registered
public accounting firm, our internal auditors and other members
of our management, each of whom has unrestricted access to the
Audit Committee.
Based on the review and discussions referred to above, the Audit
Committee recommended to our Board of Directors that the audited
financial statements be included in our annual report on
Form 10-K
for fiscal year 2007 filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission. By recommending to the Board of Directors that the
audited financial statements be so included, the Audit Committee
is not opining on the accuracy, completeness or presentation of
the information contained in the audited financial statements.
|
|
|
Date: February 25, 2008
|
|
Audit Committee
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carolyn Katz, Chairwoman
Donald E. Morgan
John W. Risner
|
39
PROPOSAL II
RATIFICATION
OF APPOINTMENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC
ACCOUNTING
FIRM
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, independent registered public
accounting firm, served as our independent registered public
accounting firm for the fiscal year ended December 31,
2007, and has been selected by the Audit Committee to serve as
our independent registered public accounting firm for the
current fiscal year. Information concerning the fees paid to
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP is included in this proxy statement
under the heading Audit Information. Representatives
of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP will be present at the Annual
Meeting and available to respond to appropriate questions from
stockholders and may make a statement if they so desire.
Although our Second Amended and Restated Bylaws do not require
stockholder ratification or other approval of the retention of
our independent registered public accounting firm, as a matter
of good corporate governance, the Board of Directors is
requesting that stockholders ratify the selection of
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as our independent registered public
accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31,
2008.
The Board of Directors recommends that the stockholders
vote FOR the Proposal for Ratification of the
Appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP.
STOCKHOLDER
PROPOSALS FOR 2009 ANNUAL MEETING
Proposals by stockholders intended to be presented at the 2009
Annual Meeting must be forwarded in writing and received at our
principal executive office at 1875 Explorer Street,
10th Floor, Reston, Virginia 20190 no later than
December 11, 2008, directed to the attention of our Vice
President, General Counsel and Secretary, for consideration for
inclusion in our proxy statement for that Annual Meeting.
Moreover, with respect to any proposal by a stockholder not
seeking to have a proposal included in our proxy statement but
seeking to have a proposal considered at the 2008 Annual
Meeting, if that stockholder fails to notify our Vice President,
General Counsel and Secretary in the manner set forth above no
later than February 24, 2009, then the persons who are
appointed as proxies may exercise their discretionary voting
authority with respect to that proposal, if the proposal is
considered at the 2009 meeting, even if stockholders have not
been advised of the proposal in the proxy statement for the 2009
Annual Meeting. Any proposals submitted by stockholders must
comply in all respects with the rules and regulations of the
Securities and Exchange Commission then in effect and Delaware
law.
IMPORTANT
INFORMATION
To assure your representation and a quorum for the
transaction of business at the Annual Meeting, we urge you to
please complete, sign, date and return the enclosed proxy card
promptly or otherwise vote by using the toll free number or
visiting the website listed on the proxy card if you are
eligible to do so.
OUR 2007 ANNUAL REPORT ON
FORM 10-K,
INCLUDING FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, IS BEING MAILED TO STOCKHOLDERS
WITH THIS PROXY STATEMENT. ADDITIONAL COPIES OF OUR 2007 ANNUAL
REPORT ON
FORM 10-K
MAY BE OBTAINED WITHOUT CHARGE BY: (1) WRITING TO NII
HOLDINGS, INC., 1875 EXPLORER STREET, 10TH FLOOR, RESTON,
VIRGINIA 20190, ATTENTION: VICE PRESIDENT, GENERAL COUNSEL AND
SECRETARY, OR (2) BY CONTACTING OUR INVESTOR RELATIONS
DEPARTMENT AT
703-390-5113.
THE ANNUAL REPORT IS NOT PART OF THE PROXY SOLICITATION
MATERIALS.
40
2. Ratification of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as our Independent Registered Public Accounting
Firm for fiscal year 2008. |
C Authorized Signatures This section must be completed for your vote to be counted. Date and
Sign Below
B Non-Voting Items
A Proposals The Board of Directors recommends a vote FOR the listed nominees and FOR the
following proposals. |
Electronic Voting Instructions You can vote by Internet or telephone! Available 24 hours a day, 7
days a week! Instead of mailing your proxy, you may choose one of the two voting methods
outlined below to vote your proxy. VALIDATION DETAILS ARE LOCATED BELOW IN THE TITLE BAR.
Proxies submitted by the Internet or telephone must be received by 1:00 a.m., Central Time, on
May 14, 2008. Vote by Internet Log on to the Internet and go to |
www.envisionreports.com/nihd Follow the steps outlined on the secured website. Vote by telephone
· Call toll free 1-800-652-VOTE (8683) within the United
States, Canada & Puerto Rico any time on a touch tone
telephone. There is NO CHARGE to you for the call. Follow the instructions provided by the
recorded message. |
For Withhold [ ] [ ]
For Withhold [ ] [ ]
For Withhold [ ] [ ]
X
Using a black ink pen, mark your votes with an X as shown in this example. Please do not
write outside the designated areas.
Annual Meeting Proxy Card
02 Charles M. Herington
01 Neal P. Goldman
1. Election of Directors |
IF YOU HAVE NOT VOTED VIA THE INTERNET OR TELEPHONE, FOLD ALONG THE PERFORATION, DETACH AND
RETURN THE BOTTOM PORTION IN THE ENCLOSED ENVELOPE. |
03 John W. Risner
Change of Address Please print your new address below. |
For Against Abstain [ ] [ ] [ ] |
For Withhold 09 <Name Here> [ ] [ ] 10 <Name Here> [ ] [ ] 11 <Name
Here> [ ] [ ] 12 <Name Here> [ ] [ ] |
For Withhold 05 <Name Here> [ ] [ ] 06 <Name Here> [ ] [ ] 07 <Name
Here> [ ] [ ] 08 <Name Here> [ ] [ ] |
Please sign exactly as name appears. When shares are held by joint tenants, both should sign. When
signing as attorney, executor, administrator, trustee or guardian, please give full title as such.
If a corporation, please sign in corporations name by President or other authorized officer. If a
partnership, please sign in partnerships name by authorized person. Date (mm/dd/yyyy) Please
print date below. Signature 1 Please keep signature within the box Signature 2 Please keep
signature within the box ___
___ |
![(PROXY CARD PAGE 2)](w53103w5310303.jpg)
This Proxy is Solicited on Behalf of the Board of Directors. The undersigned hereby appoints Steven
M. Shindler, Steven P. Dussek, Lo van Gemert, Gary D. Begeman, and Gokul Hemmady, and each or any
of them, proxies for the undersigned, with power of substitution, to vote all the shares of common
stock of NII Holdings, Inc. held of record by the undersigned on April 4, 2008, at the Annual
Meeting of Stockholders of NII Holdings, Inc. to be held at 10:00 a.m. on May 14, 2008, and at any
adjournments thereof, upon the matters listed on the reverse side, as more fully set forth in the
Proxy Statement, and for the transaction of such other business as may properly come before the
Annual Meeting and any adjournments thereof. THIS PROXY, WHEN PROPERLY EXECUTED, WILL BE VOTED IN
THE MANNER DIRECTED ON THE REVERSE SIDE BY THE UNDERSIGNED STOCKHOLDER. IF NO DIRECTION IS MADE,
THIS PROXY WILL BE VOTED FOR ALL NOMINEES IN PROPOSAL I AND FOR PROPOSAL II. PLEASE VOTE, DATE AND
SIGN ON THE REVERSE SIDE AND RETURN PROMPTLY IN THE ENCLOSED ENVELOPE. (continued and to be DATED
and SIGNED on reverse side) |
IF YOU HAVE NOT VOTED VIA THE INTERNET OR TELEPHONE, FOLD ALONG THE PERFORATION, DETACH AND
RETURN THE BOTTOM PORTION IN THE ENCLOSED ENVELOPE. |
Proxy NII Holdings, Inc. |