e10vq
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
|
|
|
þ |
|
Quarterly report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 |
For the Quarterly Period Ended February 28, 2011
OR
|
|
|
o |
|
Transition report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 |
Commission File Number: 0-19417
PROGRESS SOFTWARE CORPORATION
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
MASSACHUSETTS
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
|
|
04-2746201
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.) |
14 Oak Park
Bedford, Massachusetts 01730
(Address of principal executive offices)(Zip code)
Telephone Number: (781) 280-4000
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for
such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months
(or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a
non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions large accelerated
filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer þ
|
|
Accelerated filer o
|
|
Non-accelerated filer o (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
|
|
Smaller reporting company o |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act).
Yes o No þ
As of March 31, 2011, there were 67,020,000 shares of the registrants common stock, $.01 par value
per share, outstanding.
PROGRESS SOFTWARE CORPORATION
FORM 10-Q
FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED FEBRUARY 28, 2011
INDEX
2
PART 1. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets (unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
February 28, |
|
|
November 30, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and equivalents |
|
$ |
312,148 |
|
|
$ |
286,559 |
|
Short-term investments |
|
|
58,691 |
|
|
|
35,837 |
|
|
Total cash and short-term investments |
|
|
370,839 |
|
|
|
322,396 |
|
Accounts receivable (less allowances of $5,174 in 2011 and
$4,980 in 2010) |
|
|
104,381 |
|
|
|
119,273 |
|
Other current assets |
|
|
27,454 |
|
|
|
27,910 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
14,479 |
|
|
|
14,279 |
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
517,153 |
|
|
|
483,858 |
|
|
Property and equipment, net |
|
|
59,620 |
|
|
|
58,207 |
|
Acquired intangible assets, net |
|
|
77,053 |
|
|
|
83,208 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
238,514 |
|
|
|
238,343 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
29,444 |
|
|
|
29,214 |
|
Long-term investments and other |
|
|
44,048 |
|
|
|
43,993 |
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
965,832 |
|
|
$ |
936,823 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and Shareholders Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current portion, long-term debt |
|
$ |
396 |
|
|
$ |
388 |
|
Accounts payable |
|
|
7,437 |
|
|
|
13,176 |
|
Accrued compensation and related taxes |
|
|
26,723 |
|
|
|
44,920 |
|
Income taxes payable |
|
|
7,216 |
|
|
|
4,083 |
|
Other accrued liabilities |
|
|
39,182 |
|
|
|
36,148 |
|
Short-term deferred revenue |
|
|
158,088 |
|
|
|
138,961 |
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
239,042 |
|
|
|
237,676 |
|
|
Long-term debt, less current portion |
|
|
182 |
|
|
|
276 |
|
|
Long-term deferred revenue |
|
|
4,777 |
|
|
|
2,908 |
|
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
2,431 |
|
|
|
2,378 |
|
|
Other non-current liabilities |
|
|
4,752 |
|
|
|
5,253 |
|
|
Commitments and contingencies (Note 12) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock and additional paid-in capital; authorized, 100,000
shares; issued and outstanding, 66,957 shares in 2011
and 66,528 shares in 2010 |
|
|
362,439 |
|
|
|
347,604 |
|
Retained earnings, including accumulated other
comprehensive losses of $(4,771) in 2011 and $(9,138) in 2010 |
|
|
352,209 |
|
|
|
340,728 |
|
|
Total shareholders equity |
|
|
714,648 |
|
|
|
688,332 |
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
965,832 |
|
|
$ |
936,823 |
|
|
See notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.
3
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations (unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share data) |
|
|
Three Months Ended February 28, |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
Revenue: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Software licenses |
|
$ |
51,336 |
|
|
$ |
47,117 |
|
Maintenance and services |
|
|
82,901 |
|
|
|
80,430 |
|
|
Total revenue |
|
|
134,237 |
|
|
|
127,547 |
|
|
Costs of revenue: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of software licenses |
|
|
2,381 |
|
|
|
1,989 |
|
Cost of maintenance and services |
|
|
17,768 |
|
|
|
16,914 |
|
Amortization of acquired technology intangibles |
|
|
3,975 |
|
|
|
5,098 |
|
|
Total costs of revenue |
|
|
24,124 |
|
|
|
24,001 |
|
|
Gross profit |
|
|
110,113 |
|
|
|
103,546 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales and marketing |
|
|
44,698 |
|
|
|
43,206 |
|
Product development |
|
|
20,859 |
|
|
|
23,387 |
|
General and administrative |
|
|
11,852 |
|
|
|
12,782 |
|
Amortization of other acquired intangibles |
|
|
2,274 |
|
|
|
2,364 |
|
Restructuring expense |
|
|
2,114 |
|
|
|
25,771 |
|
Acquisition-related expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
415 |
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
|
81,797 |
|
|
|
107,925 |
|
|
Income (loss) from operations |
|
|
28,316 |
|
|
|
(4,379 |
) |
|
Other income (expense): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income and other |
|
|
588 |
|
|
|
1,481 |
|
Foreign currency gain (loss) |
|
|
(627 |
) |
|
|
1,275 |
|
|
Total other income (expense) |
|
|
(39 |
) |
|
|
2,756 |
|
|
Income (loss) before provision for income taxes |
|
|
28,277 |
|
|
|
(1,623 |
) |
Provision for (benefit from) income taxes |
|
|
7,756 |
|
|
|
(617 |
) |
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
20,521 |
|
|
$ |
(1,006 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings (loss) per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
0.31 |
|
|
|
($0.02 |
) |
Diluted |
|
$ |
0.29 |
|
|
|
($0.02 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
66,986 |
|
|
|
61,619 |
|
Diluted |
|
|
69,659 |
|
|
|
61,619 |
|
|
See notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.
4
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
Three Months Ended February 28, |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
Cash flows from operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
20,521 |
|
|
$ |
(1,006 |
) |
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash
provided by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization of property and equipment |
|
|
2,212 |
|
|
|
3,079 |
|
Amortization of acquired intangible assets |
|
|
6,249 |
|
|
|
7,462 |
|
Stock-based compensation |
|
|
4,184 |
|
|
|
4,557 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
(187 |
) |
|
|
(210 |
) |
Tax benefit from stock plans |
|
|
3,361 |
|
|
|
1,640 |
|
Excess tax benefit from stock plans |
|
|
(2,723 |
) |
|
|
(740 |
) |
Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of effects
from acquisitions: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable |
|
|
17,667 |
|
|
|
3,522 |
|
Other current assets |
|
|
506 |
|
|
|
(723 |
) |
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities |
|
|
(22,861 |
) |
|
|
6,725 |
|
Income taxes payable |
|
|
3,650 |
|
|
|
(9,361 |
) |
Deferred revenue |
|
|
17,651 |
|
|
|
19,303 |
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
50,230 |
|
|
|
34,248 |
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of investments available for sale |
|
|
(26,285 |
) |
|
|
(4,622 |
) |
Sales and maturities of investments available for sale |
|
|
3,430 |
|
|
|
19,768 |
|
Redemptions at par by issuers of auction rate securities |
|
|
200 |
|
|
|
2,250 |
|
Purchases of property and equipment |
|
|
(3,352 |
) |
|
|
(1,502 |
) |
Acquisitions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(49,086 |
) |
Decrease in other non-current assets |
|
|
65 |
|
|
|
90 |
|
|
Net cash used for investing activities |
|
|
(25,942 |
) |
|
|
(33,102 |
) |
|
Cash flows from financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of common stock |
|
|
18,857 |
|
|
|
21,117 |
|
Excess tax benefit from stock plans |
|
|
2,723 |
|
|
|
740 |
|
Payment of long-term debt |
|
|
(86 |
) |
|
|
(88 |
) |
Repurchase of common stock |
|
|
(24,977 |
) |
|
|
(10,010 |
) |
|
Net cash provided by (used for) financing activities |
|
|
(3,483 |
) |
|
|
11,759 |
|
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash |
|
|
4,784 |
|
|
|
(9,614 |
) |
|
Net increase in cash and equivalents |
|
|
25,589 |
|
|
|
3,291 |
|
Cash and equivalents, beginning of period |
|
|
286,559 |
|
|
|
175,873 |
|
|
Cash and equivalents, end of period |
|
$ |
312,148 |
|
|
$ |
179,164 |
|
|
See notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.
5
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)
Note 1: Basis of Presentation
We have prepared the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements pursuant to
the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) regarding interim
financial reporting. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes
required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America for complete
financial statements and these unaudited financial statements should be read in conjunction with
the audited financial statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year
ended November 30, 2010.
We have made no significant changes in the application of our significant accounting policies other
than required changes that were disclosed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year
ended November 30, 2010.
We have prepared the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements on the same
basis as the audited financial statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K, and these
financial statements include all adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring adjustments,
necessary for a fair presentation of the results of the interim periods presented. The operating
results for the interim periods presented are not necessarily indicative of the results expected
for the full fiscal year.
We evaluated subsequent events through the date and time our condensed consolidated financial
statements were issued.
Common Stock Split
On December 20, 2010, our Board of Directors approved a three-for-two common stock split in the
form of a stock dividend. Shareholders received one additional share for every two shares held.
The distribution was made on January 28, 2011 to shareholders of record at the close of business on
January 12, 2011. All share and per share amounts in this Annual Report have been restated to
reflect the stock split.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
Performing Step 2 of the Goodwill Impairment Test
In December 2010, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards
Update No. 2010-28, When to Perform Step 2 of the Goodwill Impairment Test for Reporting Units with
Zero or Negative Carrying Amounts (Topic 350)IntangiblesGoodwill and Other (ASU 2010-28). ASU
2010-28 amends the criteria for performing Step 2 of the goodwill impairment test for reporting
units with zero or negative carrying amounts and requires performing Step 2 if qualitative factors
indicate that it is more likely than not that a goodwill impairment exists. We will adopt ASU
2010-28 in fiscal 2012 and any impairment to be recorded upon adoption will be recognized as an
adjustment to our beginning retained earnings. We are currently evaluating the impact of the
pending adoption of ASU 2010-28 on our consolidated financial statements.
Disclosure Requirements Related to Fair Value Measurements
In January 2010, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2010-06, Improving Disclosures
about Fair Value Measurements (Topic 820)Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (ASU 2010-06),
to add additional disclosures about the different classes of assets and liabilities measured at
fair value, the valuation techniques and inputs used, and the activity in Level 3 fair value
measurements (as defined in Note 7 below). Certain provisions of this update will be effective for
us in fiscal 2012 and we are currently evaluating the impact of the pending adoption of ASU 2010-06
on our consolidated financial statements.
6
Note 2: Earnings Per Share
We compute basic earnings per share using the weighted average number of common shares outstanding.
We compute diluted earnings per share using the weighted average number of common shares
outstanding plus the effect of outstanding dilutive stock options and restricted stock units, using
the treasury stock method, and outstanding deferred stock units. The following table provides the
calculation of basic and diluted earnings per share on an interim basis:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share data) |
|
|
Three Months Ended February 28, |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
20,521 |
|
|
$ |
(1,006 |
) |
|
Weighted average shares outstanding |
|
|
66,986 |
|
|
|
61,619 |
|
Dilutive impact from outstanding stock awards |
|
|
2,673 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted weighted average shares outstanding |
|
|
69,659 |
|
|
|
61,619 |
|
|
Earnings (loss) per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
0.31 |
|
|
|
($0.02 |
) |
Diluted |
|
$ |
0.29 |
|
|
|
($0.02 |
) |
|
We excluded stock awards representing approximately 291,000 shares of common stock from the
calculation of diluted earnings per share in the first quarter of fiscal 2011 because these awards
were anti-dilutive. We excluded all outstanding stock awards from the calculation of diluted
earnings per share for the first quarter of fiscal 2010 as the impact would have been anti-dilutive
as we were in an overall net loss position.
Note 3: Stock-based Compensation
Stock-based compensation expense reflects the fair value of stock-based awards measured at the
grant date and recognized over the relevant service period. We estimate the fair value of each
stock-based award on the measurement date using either the current market price of the stock or the
Black-Scholes option valuation model. The Black-Scholes option valuation model incorporates
assumptions as to stock price volatility, the expected life of options, a risk-free interest rate
and dividend yield. We recognize stock-based compensation expense on a straight-line basis over the
service period of the award, which is generally five years for options, and three years for
restricted stock units.
The following table provides the classification of stock-based compensation as reflected in our
consolidated statements of operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
Three Months Ended February 28, |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
Cost of revenue |
|
$ |
223 |
|
|
$ |
263 |
|
Sales and marketing |
|
|
1,290 |
|
|
|
1,578 |
|
Product development |
|
|
1,269 |
|
|
|
1,107 |
|
General and administrative |
|
|
1,402 |
|
|
|
1,283 |
|
Restructuring |
|
|
|
|
|
|
326 |
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
4,184 |
|
|
$ |
4,557 |
|
|
Note 4: Income Taxes
We provide for deferred income taxes resulting from temporary differences between financial and
taxable income. We record valuation allowances to reduce deferred tax assets to the amount that is
more likely than not to be realized. We have not provided for U.S. income taxes on the
undistributed earnings of non-U.S. subsidiaries, as these earnings have been permanently reinvested
or would be principally offset by foreign tax credits.
Our federal and state income tax returns are closed by statute for all years prior to fiscal 2007
and we are no longer subject to audit for those periods. Certain state taxing authorities are
currently examining our income tax returns for years through fiscal 2008. Tax authorities for
certain non-U.S. jurisdictions are also examining returns affecting unrecognized tax benefits, none
of which are material to our balance sheet, cash flows or statements of operations. With some
exceptions, we are generally no longer subject to tax examinations in non-U.S. jurisdictions for
years prior to fiscal 2005.
7
The U.S. research and development credit was retroactively reinstated in December 2010. As a
result, in the first quarter of fiscal 2011, we recorded a tax benefit of $2.0 million related to
qualifying research and development activities from the period of January 2010 through November
2010.
We believe that we have adequately provided for any reasonably foreseeable outcomes related to our
tax audits and that any settlement will not have a material adverse effect on our consolidated
financial position or results of operations. However, there can be no assurances as to the possible
outcomes.
Note 5: Investments
A summary of our cash, cash equivalents and available-for-sale investments at February 28, 2011 is
as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Fair |
|
Security Type |
|
Basis |
|
|
Gains |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Cash |
|
$ |
199,265 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
199,265 |
|
Money market funds |
|
|
99,408 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
99,408 |
|
State and municipal bond obligations |
|
|
43,854 |
|
|
|
177 |
|
|
|
(19 |
) |
|
|
44,012 |
|
US government and agency securities |
|
|
11,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
11,499 |
|
Auction rate securities municipal bonds |
|
|
27,200 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,382 |
) |
|
|
23,818 |
|
Auction rate securities student loans |
|
|
18,800 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,779 |
) |
|
|
16,021 |
|
Corporate bonds |
|
|
16,669 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(14 |
) |
|
|
16,655 |
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
416,696 |
|
|
$ |
177 |
|
|
$ |
(6,195 |
) |
|
$ |
410,678 |
|
|
Such amounts are classified on our balance sheet at February 28, 2011 as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
Cash and |
|
|
Short-term |
|
|
Long-term |
|
Security Type |
|
Equivalents |
|
|
Investments |
|
|
Investments |
|
|
Cash |
|
$ |
199,265 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Money market funds |
|
|
99,408 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
State and municipal bond obligations |
|
|
5,975 |
|
|
|
38,037 |
|
|
|
|
|
US government and agency securities |
|
|
2,500 |
|
|
|
8,999 |
|
|
|
|
|
Auction rate securities municipal bonds |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,818 |
|
Auction rate securities student loans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,021 |
|
Corporate bonds |
|
|
5,000 |
|
|
|
11,655 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
312,148 |
|
|
$ |
58,691 |
|
|
$ |
39,839 |
|
|
For each of the auction rate securities (ARS), we evaluated the risks related to the structure,
collateral and liquidity of the investment, and forecasted the probability of issuer default,
auction failure and a successful auction at par or a redemption at par for each future auction
period. The weighted average cash flow for each period was then discounted back to present value
for each security. Based on this methodology, we determined that the fair value of our non-current
ARS investments is $39.8 million, and the temporary impairment charge recorded at February 28, 2011
in accumulated other comprehensive loss to reduce the value of our available-for-sale ARS
investments was $6.2 million.
We will not be able to access these remaining funds until a future auction for these ARS is
successful, we sell the securities in a secondary market, or they are redeemed by the issuer. As
such, these remaining investments currently lack short-term liquidity and are therefore classified
as long-term investments on the balance sheet at February 28, 2011. However, based on our cash and
short-term investments balance of $370.8 million and expected operating cash flows, we do not
anticipate the lack of liquidity associated with these ARS to adversely affect our ability to
conduct business and believe we have the ability to hold the affected securities throughout the
currently estimated recovery period. Therefore, the impairment on these securities is considered
only temporary in nature. If the credit rating of either the security issuer or the third-party
insurer underlying the investments deteriorates significantly, we may be required to adjust the
carrying value of the ARS through an other-than-temporary impairment charge to earnings.
8
A summary of our cash, cash equivalents and available-for-sale investments at November 30, 2010 is
as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Fair |
|
Security Type |
|
Basis |
|
|
Gains |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Cash |
|
$ |
154,718 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
154,718 |
|
Money market funds |
|
|
122,415 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
122,415 |
|
State and municipal bond obligations |
|
|
25,484 |
|
|
|
207 |
|
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
25,681 |
|
US government and agency securities |
|
|
10,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,000 |
|
Auction rate securities municipal bonds |
|
|
27,200 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,560 |
) |
|
|
23,640 |
|
Auction rate securities student loans |
|
|
19,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,997 |
) |
|
|
16,003 |
|
Corporate bonds |
|
|
9,418 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(21 |
) |
|
|
9,397 |
|
Certificates of deposit |
|
|
185 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
185 |
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
368,420 |
|
|
$ |
207 |
|
|
$ |
(6,588 |
) |
|
$ |
362,039 |
|
|
Such amounts are classified on our balance sheet at November 30, 2010 as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
Cash and |
|
|
Short-term |
|
|
Long-term |
|
Security Type |
|
Equivalents |
|
|
Investments |
|
|
Investments |
|
|
Cash |
|
$ |
154,718 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Money market funds |
|
|
122,415 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
State and municipal bond obligations |
|
|
1,926 |
|
|
|
23,755 |
|
|
|
|
|
US government and agency securities |
|
|
7,500 |
|
|
|
2,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
Auction rate securities municipal bonds |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,640 |
|
Auction rate securities student loans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,003 |
|
Corporate bonds |
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,397 |
|
|
|
|
|
Certificates of deposit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
185 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
286,559 |
|
|
$ |
35,837 |
|
|
$ |
39,643 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
Feb. 28, 2011 |
|
|
Nov. 30, 2010 |
|
|
Due in one year or less (1) |
|
$ |
99,283 |
|
|
$ |
70,285 |
|
Due after one year |
|
|
12,722 |
|
|
|
14,621 |
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
112,005 |
|
|
$ |
84,906 |
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes ARS which are tendered for interest-rate setting purposes periodically throughout the
year. Beginning in February 2008, auctions for these securities began to fail, and therefore these
investments currently lack short-term liquidity. The remaining contractual maturities of these
securities range from 6 to 37 years. |
Investments with continuous unrealized losses for less than twelve months and twelve months or
greater and their related fair values are as follows at February 28, 2011:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less Than |
|
|
|
|
|
|
12 Months |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12 Months |
|
|
|
|
|
|
or Greater |
|
|
Total |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
Security Type |
|
Value |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
State and municipal bond obligations |
|
$ |
19,099 |
|
|
$ |
(19 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
19,099 |
|
|
$ |
(19 |
) |
US government and agency securities |
|
|
2,999 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,999 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
Auction rate securities municipal
bonds |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,818 |
|
|
|
(3,382 |
) |
|
|
23,818 |
|
|
|
(3,382 |
) |
Auction rate securities student loans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,021 |
|
|
|
(2,779 |
) |
|
|
16,021 |
|
|
|
(2,779 |
) |
Corporate bonds |
|
|
11,655 |
|
|
|
(14 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,655 |
|
|
|
(14 |
) |
|
Total |
|
$ |
33,753 |
|
|
$ |
(34 |
) |
|
$ |
39,839 |
|
|
$ |
(6,161 |
) |
|
$ |
73,592 |
|
|
$ |
(6,195 |
) |
|
9
Investments with continuous unrealized losses for less than twelve months and twelve months or
greater and their related fair values are as follows at November 30, 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less Than |
|
|
|
|
|
|
12 Months |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12 Months |
|
|
|
|
|
|
or Greater |
|
|
Total |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
Security Type |
|
Value |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
State and municipal bond obligations |
|
$ |
6,506 |
|
|
$ |
(10 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
6,506 |
|
|
$ |
(10 |
) |
Auction rate securities municipal
bonds |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,640 |
|
|
|
(3,560 |
) |
|
|
23,640 |
|
|
|
(3,560 |
) |
Auction rate securities student loans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,003 |
|
|
|
(2,997 |
) |
|
|
16,003 |
|
|
|
(2,997 |
) |
Corporate bonds |
|
|
9,397 |
|
|
|
(21 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,397 |
|
|
|
(21 |
) |
|
Total |
|
$ |
15,903 |
|
|
$ |
(31 |
) |
|
$ |
39,643 |
|
|
$ |
(6,557 |
) |
|
$ |
55,546 |
|
|
$ |
(6,588 |
) |
|
The unrealized losses associated with state and municipal obligations and corporate bonds and notes
are attributable to changes in interest rates. The unrealized losses associated with ARS are
discussed above. Management does not believe any unrealized losses represent other-than-temporary
impairments based on our evaluation of available evidence as of February 28, 2011.
Note 6: Derivative Instruments
We generally use foreign currency option contracts that are not designated as hedging instruments
to economically hedge a portion of forecasted international cash flows for up to one year in the
future. All foreign currency option contracts are recorded at fair value in other current assets
on the balance sheet at the end of each reporting period and expire within one year. In the first
quarter of fiscal 2011, mark-to-market losses of $0.5 million on foreign currency option contracts
were recorded in other income in the statement of operations. In the first quarter of fiscal 2010,
mark-to-market gains of $1.9 million on foreign currency option contracts were recorded in other
income in the statement of operations.
We also use forward contracts that are not designated as hedging instruments to economically hedge
the impact of the variability in exchange rates on accounts receivable and collections denominated
in certain foreign currencies. We generally do not hedge the net assets of our international
subsidiaries. All forward contracts are recorded at fair value in either other current assets or
other current liabilities on the balance sheet at the end of each reporting period and expire
within 90 days. In the first quarter of fiscal 2011, losses of $0.5 million from our forward
contracts were recognized in other income in the statement of operations. In the first quarter of
fiscal 2010, losses of $5.0 million from our forward contracts were recognized in other income in
the statement of operations. These losses were substantially offset by unrealized gains on the
offsetting positions.
The table below details outstanding foreign currency forward and option contracts at February 28,
2011 where the notional amount is determined using contract exchange rates:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
Notional Value |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Foreign currency forward contracts to sell U.S. dollars |
|
$ |
11,284 |
|
|
$ |
(85 |
) |
Foreign currency forward contracts to purchase U.S. dollars |
|
|
31,531 |
|
|
|
(15 |
) |
Foreign currency option contracts to purchase U.S. dollars |
|
|
22,775 |
|
|
|
32 |
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
65,590 |
|
|
$ |
(68 |
) |
|
The table below details outstanding foreign currency forward and option contracts at November 30,
2010 where the notional amount is determined using contract exchange rates:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
Notional Value |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Foreign currency forward contracts to sell U.S. dollars |
|
$ |
36,856 |
|
|
$ |
317 |
|
Foreign currency forward contracts to purchase U.S. dollars |
|
|
13,837 |
|
|
|
54 |
|
Foreign currency option contracts to purchase U.S. dollars |
|
|
22,775 |
|
|
|
496 |
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
73,468 |
|
|
$ |
867 |
|
|
10
Note 7: Fair Value Measurements
The following table details the fair value measurements within the fair value hierarchy of our
financial assets at February 28, 2011:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurements at the Reporting Date Using |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted Prices in |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Active Markets |
|
|
Significant Other |
|
|
Significant |
|
|
|
February 28, |
|
|
Using Identical |
|
|
Observable Inputs |
|
|
Unobservable |
|
Description |
|
2011 |
|
|
Assets (Level 1) |
|
|
(Level 2) |
|
|
Inputs (Level 3) |
|
|
Money market funds |
|
$ |
99,408 |
|
|
$ |
99,408 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
State and municipal bond obligations |
|
|
44,012 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
44,012 |
|
|
|
|
|
US government and agency securities |
|
|
11,499 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,499 |
|
|
|
|
|
Auction rate securities municipal bonds |
|
|
23,818 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,818 |
|
Auction rate securities student loans |
|
|
16,021 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,021 |
|
Corporate bonds |
|
|
16,655 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,655 |
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign exchange derivatives |
|
|
(68 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(68 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
211,345 |
|
|
$ |
99,408 |
|
|
$ |
72,098 |
|
|
$ |
39,839 |
|
|
The following table details the fair value measurements within the fair value hierarchy of our
financial assets at November 30, 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurements at the Reporting Date Using |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted Prices in |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Active Markets |
|
|
Significant Other |
|
|
Significant |
|
|
|
Nov. 30, |
|
|
Using Identical |
|
|
Observable Inputs |
|
|
Unobservable |
|
Description |
|
2010 |
|
|
Assets (Level 1) |
|
|
(Level 2) |
|
|
Inputs (Level 3) |
|
|
Money market funds |
|
$ |
122,415 |
|
|
$ |
122,415 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
State and municipal bond obligations |
|
|
25,681 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,681 |
|
|
|
|
|
US government and agency securities |
|
|
10,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Auction rate securities municipal bonds |
|
|
23,640 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,640 |
|
Auction rate securities student loans |
|
|
16,003 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,003 |
|
Corporate bonds |
|
|
9,397 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,397 |
|
|
|
|
|
Certificates of deposit |
|
|
185 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
185 |
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign exchange derivatives |
|
|
867 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
867 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
208,188 |
|
|
$ |
122,415 |
|
|
$ |
46,130 |
|
|
$ |
39,643 |
|
|
The valuation technique used to measure fair value for our Level 1 and Level 2 assets is a market
approach, using prices and other relevant information generated by market transactions involving
identical or comparable assets. The valuation technique used to measure fair value for our Level 3
assets is an income approach, where the expected weighted average future cash flows were discounted
back to present value for each asset.
11
The following table reflects the activity for our financial assets measured at fair value using
Level 3 inputs for each period presented:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
Three Months Ended February 28, |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
Balance, beginning of period |
|
$ |
39,643 |
|
|
$ |
58,454 |
|
Redemptions and repurchases at par |
|
|
(200 |
) |
|
|
(2,250 |
) |
Unrealized gain (loss) included in accumulated other comprehensive income |
|
|
396 |
|
|
|
(299 |
) |
Unrealized gain on ARS trading securities included in other income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
66 |
|
Unrealized loss on put option related to ARS rights offering included in other
income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(66 |
) |
|
Balance, end of period |
|
$ |
39,839 |
|
|
$ |
55,905 |
|
|
Note 8: Comprehensive Income
The components of comprehensive income include, in addition to net income, foreign currency
translation adjustments and unrealized gains and losses on investments. The following table
provides the composition of comprehensive income on an interim basis:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
Three Months Ended February 28, |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
Net income (loss), as reported |
|
$ |
20,521 |
|
|
$ |
(1,006 |
) |
Foreign currency translation adjustments |
|
|
3,964 |
|
|
|
(4,665 |
) |
Unrealized gain (loss) on investments |
|
|
403 |
|
|
|
(30 |
) |
|
Total comprehensive income (loss) |
|
$ |
24,888 |
|
|
$ |
(5,701 |
) |
|
Note 9: Common Stock Repurchases
We purchased approximately 847,000 shares and 527,000 shares of our common stock for $25.0 million
and $10.0 million in the first three months of fiscal 2011 and fiscal 2010, respectively. The
Board of Directors has authorized, for the period from October 1, 2010 through September 30, 2011,
the purchase of up to $100 million of our common stock, at such times that management deems such
purchases to be an effective use of cash. The remaining balance under this authorization was
approximately $75 million at February 28, 2011.
Note 10: Goodwill
Goodwill is the amount by which the cost of acquired net assets in a business acquisition exceeded
the fair value of net identifiable assets on the date of purchase. Goodwill in certain foreign
jurisdictions changes each period due to changes in foreign currency exchange rates. During the
first quarter of fiscal 2011, we completed our annual testing for impairment of goodwill and, based
on those tests, concluded that no impairment of goodwill existed as of December 15, 2010. For
purposes of the annual impairment test, we assigned goodwill of $61.1 million to the Application
Development Platforms operating segment, $76.9 million to the Enterprise Business Solutions
operating segment and $100.5 million to the Enterprise Data Solutions operating segment. All of
our operating segments had an estimated fair value that was substantially in excess of the carrying
value and none was at potential risk of failing step-one of our goodwill impairment analysis. See
Note 11 for a description of each operating segment.
Note 11: Segment Information
Operating segments, as defined under generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP), are
components of an enterprise about which discrete financial information is available and regularly
reviewed by the chief operating decision maker in deciding how to allocate resources and assess
performance. We internally report results to our chief operating decision maker on both a
business unit basis and a functional basis. Our business units represent our segments for financial
reporting purposes.
However, our organization is managed primarily on a functional basis. We assign dedicated costs
and expenses directly to each business unit. We utilize an allocation methodology to assign all
other costs and expenses to each business unit. A
12
significant portion of the total costs and
expenses assigned to each business unit are allocated. We disclose revenue and operating income
based upon internal accounting methods. Our chief operating decision maker is our Chief Executive
Officer.
We have three business units, each of which meet the criteria for segment reporting: (1)
Application Development Platforms, which includes the OpenEdge, Orbix and ObjectStore product sets;
(2) Enterprise Business Solutions, which includes the Apama, Sonic, Actional, Savvion and Fuse
product sets; and (3) Enterprise Data Solutions, which includes the DataDirect Connect, DataDirect
Shadow and DataServices product sets.
We do not manage our assets or capital expenditures by segment or assign other income and income
taxes to segments. We manage and report such items on a consolidated company basis.
The following table provides revenue and income (losses) from operations for our reportable
segments on an interim basis:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
Three months ended February 28, |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
Revenue: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Application Development Platform segment |
|
$ |
79,077 |
|
|
$ |
81,856 |
|
Enterprise Business Solutions segment |
|
|
37,172 |
|
|
|
27,692 |
|
Enterprise Data Solutions segment |
|
|
18,033 |
|
|
|
18,453 |
|
Reconciling items |
|
|
(45 |
) |
|
|
(454 |
) |
|
Total |
|
$ |
134,237 |
|
|
$ |
127,547 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from operations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Application Development Platform segment |
|
$ |
46,656 |
|
|
$ |
48,626 |
|
Enterprise Business Solutions segment |
|
|
(6,835 |
) |
|
|
(11,026 |
) |
Enterprise Data Solutions segment |
|
|
1,512 |
|
|
|
(4,846 |
) |
Reconciling items |
|
|
(13,017 |
) |
|
|
(37,133 |
) |
|
Total |
|
$ |
28,316 |
|
|
$ |
(4,379 |
) |
|
The reconciling items within revenue represent purchase accounting adjustments for deferred revenue
related to acquisitions. The reconciling items within income from operations represent
amortization of acquired intangibles, stock-based compensation, restructuring and
acquisition-related expenses, purchase accounting adjustments for deferred revenue and certain
unallocated administrative expenses. Reconciling items are excluded from segment measurements, as
such amounts are not deducted from internal measurements of segment revenue or operating income.
In the following table, revenue attributed to North America includes sales to customers in the
United States and Canada and licensing to certain multinational organizations, substantially all of
which is invoiced from the United States. Revenue from Europe, Middle East and Africa (EMEA), Latin
America and Asia Pacific includes shipments to customers in each region, not including certain
multinational organizations, plus export shipments into each region that are billed from the United
States. Information relating to revenue from external customers from different geographical areas
is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
Three months ended February 28, |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
North America |
|
$ |
64,478 |
|
|
$ |
57,820 |
|
EMEA |
|
|
51,415 |
|
|
|
52,280 |
|
Latin America |
|
|
9,159 |
|
|
|
9,778 |
|
Asia Pacific |
|
|
9,185 |
|
|
|
7,669 |
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
134,237 |
|
|
$ |
127,547 |
|
|
13
Note 12: Contingencies
We are subject to various legal proceedings and claims, either asserted or unasserted, which arise
in the ordinary course of business. While the outcome of these claims cannot be predicted with
certainty, management does not believe that the outcome of any of these other legal matters will
have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial position or results of operations.
On January 21, 2010, JuxtaComm Technologies (JuxtaComm) filed a complaint in the Eastern District
of Texas against Progress Software, two of our subsidiaries and 19 other defendants, alleging
infringement of JuxtaComms US patent 6,195,662 (System for Transforming and Exchanging Data
Between Distributed Heterogeneous Computer Systems). In its complaint, JuxtaComm alleges that
certain of the products within our Sonic, Fuse, DataDirect Connect and DataServices product sets
infringe JuxtaComms patent. In its complaint, JuxtaComm seeks unspecified monetary damages and
permanent injunctive relief.
In May 2010, we filed a response to this complaint in which we denied all claims. The discovery
phase of this litigation has commenced. Trial is scheduled for January 3, 2012.
We intend to defend the action vigorously. While we believe that we have valid defenses to
JuxtaComms claims, litigation is inherently unpredictable and we cannot make an estimate of the
range of potential loss. It is possible that our business, financial position, or results of
operations could be negatively affected by an unfavorable resolution of this action.
Note 13: Restructuring Charges
During fiscal 2010, our management approved, committed to and initiated plans to restructure and
improve efficiencies in our operations as a result of certain management and organizational
changes. Restructurings were undertaken in the first and third quarters of 2010 to better position
the company for long-term growth, improved profitability, greater competitiveness and improved
efficiency across our global business. Actions taken during these restructurings included the
refinement of our product portfolio towards core and high-growth opportunities and the global
consolidation and redeployment of a portion of our product development and administrative
personnel, assets and processes to other global locations that offer greater efficiencies to the
business and the continued consolidation of offices around the world. To accomplish these goals,
and with a view toward better optimizing operations and improving productivity and efficiency, we
reduced our global workforce primarily within the development, sales and administrative
organizations. This workforce reduction was conducted across all geographies and also resulted in a
consolidation of offices in certain locations. Certain activities related to the second fiscal
2010 restructuring continued into the first three months of fiscal 2011 and are expected to
continue through fiscal 2011. The total costs of the fiscal 2010 restructurings primarily relate
to employee severance and facilities related expenses, and are recorded to the restructuring
expense line item within our consolidated statements of operations. The excess facilities and
other costs represent facilities costs for unused space and termination costs of automobile leases
for employees included in the workforce reduction.
As part of the restructuring plan, we also increased our investment and expansion of development
and administration operations in India, where we have run a successful development organization for
several years. Over the remaining nine months of fiscal 2011, we expect to increase the size of
our product development organization in Hyderabad, India, from about a third of our development
resources to about half, in order manage our development costs as we increase overall product
development headcount and capacity in our key product areas. Therefore, we expect to move and add
additional product group functions as well as certain administrative functions to India. This
expansion in India will result in the reduction of our development and administration operations
headcount in other geographies in which we operate.
Through these initiatives, we expect to incur aggregate future pre-tax restructuring charges and
pre-tax non-recurring transition expenses of approximately $3 million to $6 million over the
remaining nine months of fiscal 2011, primarily comprising costs for severance, transition costs
and consolidation of facilities. The transition expenses are necessary to ramp up the new, more
efficient capabilities ahead of switching over from the existing cost structure. We will report
these restructuring charges and transition expenses in our financial results as they are incurred
during the phase-in period.
14
A summary of activity for all restructuring actions is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
Excess Facilities |
|
|
Employee Severance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
and Other Costs |
|
|
and Related Benefits |
|
|
Total |
|
|
Balance, December 1, 2010 |
|
|
8,627 |
|
|
|
4,016 |
|
|
|
12,643 |
|
Additional reserves related to Q3 2010 restructuring
and adjustments to initial reserves |
|
|
1,280 |
|
|
|
834 |
|
|
|
2,114 |
|
Cash disbursements |
|
|
(1,448 |
) |
|
|
(2,690 |
) |
|
|
(4,138 |
) |
Translation adjustments and other |
|
|
51 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
66 |
|
|
Balance, February 28, 2011 |
|
$ |
8,510 |
|
|
$ |
2,175 |
|
|
$ |
10,685 |
|
|
The amounts included under cash disbursements for excess facilities costs are net of proceeds
received from sublease agreements. The balance of the employee severance and related benefits is
expected to be paid over a period of time ending in fiscal 2011. The balance of the excess
facilities and related costs is expected to be paid over a period of time ending in fiscal 2013.
For all restructuring reserves described above the short-term portion of $7.3 million is included
in other accrued liabilities and the long-term portion of $3.4 million is included in other
non-current liabilities on the balance sheet at February 28, 2011.
15
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements
The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 contains certain safe harbor provisions
regarding forward-looking statements. This Form 10-Q, and other information provided by us or
statements made by our directors, officers or employees from time to time, may contain
forward-looking statements and information, which involve risks and uncertainties. Actual future
results may differ materially. Statements indicating that we expect, estimate, believe, are
planning or plan to are forward-looking, as are other statements concerning future financial
results, product offerings or other events that have not yet occurred. There are several important
factors that could cause actual results or events to differ materially from those anticipated by
the forward-looking statements, including but not limited to the following: the receipt and
shipment of new orders; the timely release and market acceptance of new products and /or
enhancements to our existing products; the growth rates of certain market segments; the positioning
of our products in those market segments; the customer demand and acceptance of our new product
initiative, the Progress RPM suite; variations in the demand for professional services and
technical support; pricing pressures and the competitive environment in the software industry; the
continued uncertainty in the U.S. and international economies, which could result in fewer sales of
our products and may otherwise harm our business; business and consumer use of the Internet; our
ability to complete and integrate acquisitions; our ability to realize the expected benefits and
anticipated synergies from acquired businesses; our ability to penetrate international markets and
manage our international operations; and those factors discussed in Part I, Item 1A (Risk Factors)
in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended November 30, 2010. Although we have
sought to identify the most significant risks to our business, we cannot predict whether, or to
what extent, any of such risks may be realized. We also cannot assure you that we have identified
all possible issues which we might face. We undertake no obligation to update any forward-looking
statements that we make.
Overview
We are a global enterprise software company that enables organizations to achieve higher levels of
business performance by improving their operational responsiveness. Operational responsiveness is
the ability of business processes and systems to respond to changing business conditions and
customer interactions as they occur. We offer a portfolio of best-in-class, real-time business
solutions providing visibility into business systems and processes, event processing to respond to
business events that could affect performance, and business process management enabling businesses
to continually improve business processes with no disruption to their business. We also provide
enterprise data solutions (data access and integration) and application development platforms (for
application development and management, and SaaS enablement). We maximize the benefits of
operational responsiveness while minimizing information technology complexity and total cost of
ownership.
Our segment reporting consists of three business units: Application Development Platforms,
Enterprise Business Solutions and Enterprise Data Solutions. Our product lines comply with open
standards, deliver high levels of performance and scalability and provide a low total cost of
ownership. Our products are generally sold under perpetual licenses, but certain product lines and
business activities also utilize a term or subscription licensing model. A complete discussion of
our business units is included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for our fiscal year ended November
30, 2010.
During fiscal 2010, our management approved, committed to and initiated plans to restructure and
improve efficiencies in our operations as a result of certain management and organizational
changes. Restructurings were undertaken in the first and third quarter of fiscal 2010 to better
position the company for long-term growth, improved profitability, greater competitiveness and
improved efficiency across our global business. Actions taken during these restructurings included
the refinement of our product portfolio towards core and high-growth opportunities and the global
consolidation and redeployment of a portion of our product development and administrative
personnel, assets and processes to other global locations that offer greater efficiencies to the
business and the continued consolidation of offices around the world. We also increased our
investment and expansion of development and administration operations in India, where we have run a
successful development organization for several years. We expect to increase the size of our
product development organization in Hyderabad, India, from about a third of our development
resources to about half, in order to manage our development costs as we increase overall product
development headcount and capacity in our key product areas. Therefore, over the next nine months,
we expect to move and add additional product group functions as well as certain administrative
functions to India. This expansion in India will result in the reduction of our development and
administration operations headcount in all other geographies in which we operate.
Through these initiatives, we expect to incur aggregate future pre-tax restructuring charges and
pre-tax non-recurring transition expenses of approximately $3 million to $6 million over the
remaining nine months of fiscal 2011, primarily comprising costs for severance, transition costs
and consolidation of facilities. The transition expenses are necessary to ramp up the new, more
efficient capabilities ahead of switching over from the existing cost structure.
16
Another factor impacting our results is that we derive a significant portion of our revenue from
international operations. These operations are primarily conducted in foreign currencies. As a
result, changes in the value of these foreign currencies relative to the U.S. dollar significantly
impact our results of operations. In the first six months of fiscal 2010, the year-over-year
decline in the value of the U.S. dollar against most major currencies positively affected the
translation of our results into U.S. dollars. In the last six months of fiscal 2010 and in the
first three months of fiscal 2011, the year-over-year increase in the value of the U.S. dollar
against most major currencies negatively affected the translation of our results into U.S. dollars.
We see the most significant risks for fiscal 2011 continuing to be the macroeconomic climate
(including the recent events in Japan), which could cause our customers to delay, forego or reduce
the amount of their investments in our products or delay payments of amounts due to us.
Critical Accounting Policies
Our consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted
accounting principles (GAAP). These accounting principles require us to make certain estimates,
judgments and assumptions. We believe that the estimates, judgments and assumptions upon which we
rely are reasonable based upon information available to us at the time that these estimates,
judgments and assumptions are made. These estimates, judgments and assumptions can affect the
reported amounts of assets and liabilities as of the date of the financial statements as well as
the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the periods presented. To the extent there are
material differences between these estimates, judgments or assumptions and actual results, our
financial statements will be affected. The accounting policies that reflect our more significant
estimates, judgments and assumptions and which we believe are the most critical to aid in fully
understanding and evaluating our reported financial results include the following:
|
|
|
Revenue Recognition |
|
|
|
|
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts |
|
|
|
|
Goodwill and Intangible Assets |
|
|
|
|
Income Tax Accounting |
|
|
|
|
Stock-Based Compensation |
|
|
|
|
Investments in Debt Securities |
|
|
|
|
Restructuring Charges |
In many cases, the accounting treatment of a particular transaction is specifically dictated by
GAAP and does not require managements judgment in its application. There are also areas in which
managements judgment in selecting among available alternatives would not produce a materially
different result. Our senior management has reviewed these critical accounting policies and related
disclosures with the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors.
During the first three months of fiscal 2011, there were no significant changes in our
critical accounting policies and estimates. See Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations in Item 7 of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year
ended November 30, 2010 for a more complete discussion of our critical accounting policies and
estimates.
17
Results of Operations
The following table provides certain income and expense items as a percentage of total revenue, and
the percentage change in dollar amounts of such items compared with the corresponding period in the
previous fiscal year:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period to Period |
|
|
|
Percentage of Total Revenue |
|
|
Change |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Compared |
|
|
|
Feb. 28, 2011 |
|
|
Feb. 28, 2010 |
|
|
to 2010 |
|
|
Revenue: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Software licenses |
|
|
38 |
% |
|
|
37 |
% |
|
|
9 |
% |
Maintenance and services |
|
|
62 |
|
|
|
63 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
Total revenue |
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
Costs of revenue: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of software licenses |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
Cost of maintenance and services |
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
Amortization of acquired intangibles for
purchased technology |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
(22 |
) |
|
Total costs of revenue |
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
Gross profit |
|
|
82 |
|
|
|
81 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
Operating expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales and marketing |
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
Product development |
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
(11 |
) |
General and administrative |
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
(7 |
) |
Amortization of other acquired intangibles |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
Restructuring expenses |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
(92 |
) |
Acquisition-related expenses |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
(100 |
) |
|
Total operating expenses |
|
|
61 |
|
|
|
84 |
|
|
|
(24 |
) |
|
Income (loss) from operations |
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
|
* |
Other (expense) income, net |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Income (loss) before provision for income taxes |
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
* |
Provision for (benefit from) income taxes |
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Net income (loss) |
|
|
15 |
% |
|
|
(1 |
)% |
|
|
|
* |
|
Revenue. Our total revenue increased 5% from $127.5 million in the first quarter of fiscal 2010 to
$134.2 million in the first quarter of fiscal 2011. Total revenue would have increased by 6% if
exchange rates had been constant in the first quarter of fiscal 2011 as compared to exchange rates
in effect in the first quarter of fiscal 2010. On a segment basis, revenue from our Application
Development Platforms product line decreased 3% from $81.9 million in the first quarter of fiscal
2010 to $79.1 million in the first quarter of fiscal 2011. Revenue from our Enterprise Business
Solutions product line increased 34% from $27.7 million in the first quarter of fiscal 2010 to
$37.2 million in the first quarter of fiscal 2011. Revenue from our Enterprise Data Solutions
product line decreased 2% from $18.5 million in the first quarter of fiscal 2010 to $18.0 million
in the first quarter of fiscal 2011.
Software license revenue increased 9% from $47.1 million in the first quarter of fiscal 2010 to
$51.3 million in the first quarter of fiscal 2011. Software license revenue would have increased
by 10% if exchange rates had been constant in the first quarter of fiscal 2011 as compared to
exchange rates in effect in the first quarter of fiscal 2010. The increase in software license
revenue in fiscal 2011 was primarily due to strong performance from our indirect channels.
Software license revenue from indirect channels increased by 18% in the first quarter of fiscal
2011 as compared to the first quarter of fiscal 2010. Software license revenue from direct end
users increased by 1% in the first quarter of fiscal 2011 as compare to the first quarter of fiscal
2010.
Maintenance and services revenue increased 3% from $80.4 million in the first quarter of fiscal
2010 to $82.9 million in the first quarter of fiscal 2011. Maintenance revenue increased 1% and
professional services revenue increased 18% in the first quarter of fiscal 2011 as compared to the
first quarter of fiscal 2010. Maintenance and services revenue would have increased
18
by 4% if exchange rates had been constant in the first quarter of fiscal 2011 as compared to
exchange rates in effect in the first quarter of fiscal 2010. Excluding the impact of changes in
exchange rates, the increase in maintenance and services revenue was primarily the result of growth
in our professional services revenue primarily from our Enterprise Business Solutions product line
and a slight increase in our installed customer base of maintenance renewals.
Total revenue generated in North America increased 12% from $57.8 million in the first quarter of
fiscal 2010 to $64.5 million in the first quarter of fiscal 2011 and represented 45% of total
revenue in the first quarter of fiscal 2010 compared to 48% in the first quarter of fiscal 2011.
Total revenue generated in markets outside of North America increased slightly from $69.7 million
in the first quarter of fiscal 2010 to $69.8 million in the first quarter of fiscal 2011 and
represented 55% of total revenue in the first quarter of fiscal 2010 compared to 52% in the first
quarter of fiscal 2011. Total revenue generated in markets outside of North America would have
represented 52% of total revenue if exchange rates had been constant in the first quarter of fiscal
2011 as compared to the exchange rates in effect in the first quarter of fiscal 2010. Revenue from
two of the three major regions outside of North America, consisting of EMEA and Latin America
decreased in the first quarter of fiscal 2011 as compared to the first quarter of fiscal 2010,
partially offset by an increase in revenue from Asia Pacific.
Cost of Software Licenses. Cost of software licenses consists primarily of costs of
royalties, electronic software distribution costs, duplication and packaging. Cost of software
licenses increased 20% from $2.0 million in the first quarter of fiscal 2010 to $2.4 million in the
first quarter of 2011, and increased as a percentage of software license revenue from 4% to 5%.
The increase for the first quarter was primarily due to higher royalty expense for products and
technologies licensed or resold from third parties. Cost of software licenses as a percentage of
software license revenue varies from period to period depending upon the relative product mix.
Cost of Maintenance and Services. Cost of maintenance and services consists primarily of costs of
providing customer support, consulting and education. Cost of maintenance and services increased
5% from $16.9 million in the first quarter of fiscal 2010 to $17.8 million in the first quarter of
fiscal 2011, and remained the same as a percentage of maintenance and services revenue at 21%.
Cost of maintenance and services increased in the first three months of fiscal 2011 as compared to
the first three months of fiscal 2010 due to higher professional services costs associated with
higher professional services revenue.
Amortization of Acquired Intangibles for Purchased Technology. Amortization of acquired
intangibles for purchased technology primarily represents the amortization of the value assigned to
technology-related intangible assets obtained in business combinations. Amortization of acquired
intangibles for purchased technology decreased 22% from $5.1 million in the first quarter of fiscal
2010 to $4.0 million in the first quarter of fiscal 2011. The decrease was due to the completion
of amortization of intangible assets acquired as part of acquisitions in prior years.
Gross Profit. Our gross profit increased 6% from $103.5 million in the first quarter of fiscal
2010 to $110.1 million in the first quarter of fiscal 2011. Our gross profit as a percentage of
total revenue increased from 81% in the first three months of fiscal 2010 to 82% in the first three
months of fiscal 2011. The increase in our gross profit percentage was due to the increase in
total revenue and lower amortization expense of acquired intangibles for purchased technology as
described above.
Sales and Marketing. Sales and marketing expenses increased 3% from $43.2 million in the first
quarter of fiscal 2010 to $44.7 million in the first quarter of fiscal 2011, but decreased as a
percentage of total revenue from 34% to 33%. The increase in sales and marketing expenses was
primarily due to higher marketing program expense, outside services related to outsourced sales
activities and higher recruiting costs for sales personnel, partially offset by lower headcount
related expenses as a result of the restructuring activities that occurred in fiscal 2010.
Product Development. Product development expenses decreased 11% from $23.4 million in the first
quarter of fiscal 2010 to $20.9 million in the first quarter of fiscal 2011, and decreased as a
percentage of revenue from 18% to 16%. The decrease was primarily due to headcount-related savings
from the restructuring activities that occurred in fiscal 2010.
General and Administrative. General and administrative expenses include the costs of our finance,
human resources, legal, information systems and administrative departments. General and
administrative expenses decreased 7% from $12.8 million in the first quarter of fiscal 2010 to
$11.9 million in the first quarter of fiscal 2011, and decreased as a percentage of revenue from
10% to 9%. The decrease was primarily due to headcount-related savings from the restructuring
activities that occurred in fiscal 2010.
Restructuring Expenses. Restructuring expenses decreased from $25.8 million in the first quarter
of fiscal 2010 to $2.1 million in the first quarter of fiscal 2011. Restructuring expenses in the
first quarter of fiscal 2010 included employee severance, excess facilities costs for unused space
and termination costs of automobile leases for terminated employees in connection with
19
the large work-force reduction in fiscal 2010. Restructuring expenses in the first quarter of
fiscal 2011 included ongoing costs related to decisions from the Q3 2010 restructuring activities.
Amortization of Other Acquired Intangibles. Amortization of other acquired intangibles primarily
represents the amortization of value assigned to non-technology-related intangible assets obtained
in business combinations. Amortization of other acquired intangibles decreased 4% from $2.4
million in the first quarter of fiscal 2010 to $2.3 million in the first quarter of fiscal 2011.
The decrease was due to the completion of amortization of intangible assets acquired as part of
acquisitions in prior years.
Acquisition-related Expenses. Acquisition-related expenses in the first three months of fiscal
2010 primarily relate to the transaction costs, primarily professional services fees, associated
with the acquisition of Savvion.
Income (loss) From Operations. Income from operations increased from a loss of $4.4 million in
the first quarter of fiscal 2010 to a profit of $28.3 million in the first quarter of fiscal 2011.
The increase in the first quarter of fiscal 2011 as compared to the first quarter of fiscal 2010
was primarily the result of the restructuring charge that occurred in the first quarter of 2010,
revenue growth and operating efficiencies from the restructurings.
On a segment basis, operating income from our Application Development Platforms business unit
decreased 4% from $48.6 million in the first quarter of fiscal 2010 to $46.7 million in the first
quarter of fiscal 2011. The operating loss from our Enterprise Business Solutions business unit
decreased 38% from $(11.0) million in the first quarter of fiscal 2010 to $(6.8) million in the
first quarter of fiscal 2011 due to strong revenue growth. The operating loss from our Enterprise
Data Solutions business unit of $(4.8) million in the first quarter of fiscal 2010 moved to an
operating profit of $1.5 million in the first quarter of fiscal 2011 due to operating efficiencies
from the restructurings. See further discussion of segment reporting in Note 11 of the condensed
consolidated financial statements included in this report.
Other Income (Expense). Other income (expense), primarily consisting of interest income and
foreign currency gains and losses, decreased from income of $2.8 million in the first quarter of
fiscal 2010 to an expense of less than $0.1 million in the first quarter of fiscal 2011. The
decrease was primarily due to the increase in the value of our foreign currency average rate option
contracts and an insurance settlement gain related to a pre-acquisition contingency assumed as part
of a prior acquisition, both of which occurred in fiscal 2010.
Provision for Income Taxes. Our effective tax rate was 27.4% in the first three months of 2011 as
compared to 38.0% in the first three months of fiscal 2010. The decrease was primarily due to the
reinstatement of the research and development credit in the United States in the first quarter of
fiscal 2011 as well as greater expected tax benefits from the Internal Revenue Code Section 199
production deduction. The research and development credit was retroactively reinstated in December
2010. As a result, in the first quarter of fiscal 2011, we recorded a tax benefit of $2.0 million
related to qualifying research and development activities from the period of January 2010 through
November 2010.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Cash and Short-term Investments
At the end of the first quarter of fiscal 2011, our cash and short-term investments totaled $370.8
million. The increase of $48.4 million since the end of fiscal 2010 was primarily due to cash
generated from operations and issuances of common stock upon exercise of stock options, partially
offset by cash used for share repurchases. There are no limitations on our ability to access our
cash and short-term investments.
Auction Rate Securities
In addition to the $370.8 million of cash and short-term investments, we had investments with a
fair value of $39.8 million related to auction rate securities (ARS) that are classified as
long-term investments. These ARS are floating rate securities with longer-term maturities that
were marketed by financial institutions with auction reset dates at primarily 28 or 35 day
intervals to provide short-term liquidity. The remaining contractual maturities of these
securities range from 13 to 32 years. The underlying collateral of the ARS consist of municipal
bonds, which are insured by monoline insurance companies, and student loans, which are supported by
the federal government as part of the Federal Family Education Loan Program (FFELP) and by the
monoline insurance companies.
Beginning in February 2008, auctions for these securities began to fail, and the interest rates for
these ARS reset to the maximum rate per the applicable investment offering document. At November
30, 2010, our ARS investments classified as long-term investments totaled $46.2 million at par
value. During the first three months of fiscal 2011, noncurrent ARS totaling
20
$0.2 million were redeemed at par by the issuers, resulting in a net reduction of the par value of
our ARS investments classified as long-term investments to $46.0 million. These ARS are classified
as available-for-sale securities.
For each of the ARS classified as available-for-sale, we evaluated the risks related to the
structure, collateral and liquidity of the investment, and forecasted the probability of issuer
default, auction failure and a successful auction at par or a redemption at par for each future
auction period. The weighted average cash flow for each period was then discounted back to present
value for each security. Based on this methodology, we determined that the fair value of our
non-current ARS investments is $39.8 million at February 28, 2011, and we have recorded a temporary
impairment charge in accumulated other comprehensive income of $6.2 million to reduce the value of
our available-for-sale ARS investments.
We will not be able to access these remaining funds until a future auction for these ARS is
successful, we sell the securities in a secondary market, or they are redeemed by the issuer. As
such, these remaining investments currently lack short-term liquidity and are therefore classified
as long-term investments on our consolidated balance sheet at February 28, 2011. Based on our cash
and short-term investments balance of $370.8 million and expected operating cash flows, we do not
anticipate the lack of liquidity associated with these ARS to adversely affect our ability to
conduct business and believe we have the ability to hold the affected securities throughout the
currently estimated recovery period. Therefore, the impairment on these securities is considered
only temporary in nature. If the credit rating of either the security issuer or the third-party
insurer underlying the investments deteriorates significantly, we may be required to adjust the
carrying value of the ARS through an impairment charge.
Cash Flows from Operations
We generated $50.2 million in cash from operations in the first three months of fiscal 2011 as
compared to $34.2 million in the first three months of fiscal 2010. The increase in cash generated
from operations in the first three months of fiscal 2011 over the first three months of fiscal 2010
was primarily due to higher profitability.
A summary of our cash flows from operations for the first quarters of fiscal years 2011 and 2010 is
as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
Three Months Ended February 28, |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
20,521 |
|
|
$ |
(1,006 |
) |
Depreciation, amortization and other noncash charges |
|
|
12,645 |
|
|
|
15,098 |
|
Tax benefit (deficiency) from stock plans |
|
|
638 |
|
|
|
900 |
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities |
|
|
16,426 |
|
|
|
19,256 |
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
50,230 |
|
|
$ |
34,248 |
|
|
Accounts receivable decreased by $14.9 million from the end of fiscal 2010. Accounts receivable
days sales outstanding, or DSO, increased two days to 70 days at the end of the first quarter of
fiscal 2011 as compared to the end of the first quarter of fiscal 2010 and decreased four days from
the end of fiscal 2010. We target a DSO range of 60 to 80 days.
Cash Flows from Investing and Financing Activities
We purchased property and equipment totaling $3.4 million in the first three months of fiscal 2011
as compared to $1.5 million in the first three months of fiscal 2010. The purchases consisted
primarily of computer equipment and software and building and leasehold improvements.
We purchased approximately 847,000 shares of our common stock for $25.0 million in the first three
months of fiscal 2011 as compared to approximately 527,000 shares of our common stock for $10.0
million in the first three months of fiscal 2010.
We received $18.9 million in the first three months of fiscal 2011 from the exercise of stock
options and the issuance of shares under our employee stock purchase plan as compared to $21.1
million in the first three months of fiscal 2010.
We expect to pursue acquisitions during the remainder of fiscal 2011, although we can make no
assurances that we will be able to identify and complete any acquisitions. Our acquisition strategy
has been to expand our business and/or add complimentary products and technologies to our existing
product sets. To the extent that we complete any future acquisitions, our cash position could be
reduced.
21
Indemnification Obligations
We include standard intellectual property indemnification provisions in our licensing agreements in
the ordinary course of business. Pursuant to our product license agreements, we will indemnify,
hold harmless, and agree to reimburse the indemnified party for losses suffered or incurred by the
indemnified party, generally business partners or customers, in connection with certain patent,
copyright or other intellectual property infringement claims by third parties with respect to our
products. Other agreements with our customers provide indemnification for claims relating to
property damage or personal injury resulting from the performance of services by us or our
subcontractors. Historically, our costs to defend lawsuits or settle claims relating to such
indemnity agreements have been insignificant. Accordingly, the estimated fair value of these
indemnification provisions is immaterial.
Liquidity Outlook
We believe that existing cash balances together with funds generated from operations will be
sufficient to finance our operations and meet our foreseeable cash requirements (including planned
capital expenditures, acquisitions, lease commitments, restructuring obligations, debt payments and
other long-term obligations) through at least the next twelve months.
Revenue Backlog
Our aggregate revenue backlog at February 28, 2011 was approximately $180 million, of which $163
million was included on our balance sheet as deferred revenue, primarily related to unexpired
maintenance and support contracts. At February 28, 2011, the remaining amount of backlog of
approximately $17 million was composed of multi-year licensing arrangements of approximately $16
million and open software license orders received but not shipped of approximately $1 million. Our
backlog of orders not included on the balance sheet is not subject to our normal accounting
controls for information that is either reported in or derived from our basic financial statements.
Our aggregate revenue backlog at February 28, 2010 was approximately $188 million, of which $161
million was included on our balance sheet as deferred revenue, primarily related to unexpired
maintenance and support contracts. At February 28, 2010, the remaining amount of backlog of
approximately $27 million was composed of multi-year licensing arrangements of approximately $21
million and open software license orders received but not shipped of approximately $6 million. Our
backlog of orders not included on the balance sheet is not subject to our normal accounting
controls for information that is either reported in or derived from our basic financial statements.
We typically fulfill most of our software license orders within 30 days of acceptance of a
purchase order. Assuming all other revenue recognition criteria have been met, we recognize
software license revenue upon shipment of the product, or if delivered electronically, when the
customer has the right to access the software. Because there are many elements governing when
revenue is recognized, including when orders are shipped, credit approval obtained, completion of
internal control processes over revenue recognition and other factors, management has some control
in determining the period in which certain revenue is recognized. We frequently have open software
license orders at the end of the quarter which have not shipped or have otherwise not met all the
required criteria for revenue recognition. Although the amount of open software license orders may
vary at any time, we generally do not believe that the amount, if any, of such software license
orders at the end of a particular quarter is a reliable indicator of future performance. In
addition, there is no industry standard for the definition of backlog and there may be an element
of estimation in determining the amount. As such, direct comparisons with other companies may be
difficult or potentially misleading.
Legal and Other Regulatory Matters
See discussion regarding legal and other regulatory matters in Part II, Item 1. Legal
Proceedings.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
Our only significant off-balance sheet commitments relate to operating lease obligations. Future
annual minimum rental lease payments are detailed in Note 11 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended November 30, 2010. We have
no off-balance sheet arrangements within the meaning of Item 303(a)(4) of Regulation S-K.
22
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
Performing Step 2 of the Goodwill Impairment Test
In December 2010, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards
Update No. 2010-28, When to Perform Step 2 of the Goodwill Impairment Test for Reporting Units with
Zero or Negative Carrying Amounts (Topic 350)IntangiblesGoodwill and Other (ASU 2010-28). ASU
2010-28 amends the criteria for performing Step 2 of the goodwill impairment test for reporting
units with zero or negative carrying amounts and requires performing Step 2 if qualitative factors
indicate that it is more likely than not that a goodwill impairment exists. We will adopt ASU
2010-28 in fiscal 2012 and any impairment to be recorded upon adoption will be recognized as an
adjustment to our beginning retained earnings. We are currently evaluating the impact of the
pending adoption of ASU 2010-28 on our consolidated financial statements.
Disclosure Requirements Related to Fair Value Measurements
In January 2010, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2010-06, Improving Disclosures
about Fair Value Measurements (Topic 820)Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (ASU 2010-06),
to add additional disclosures about the different classes of assets and liabilities measured at
fair value, the valuation techniques and inputs used, and the activity in Level 3 fair value
measurements (as defined in Note 3 below). Certain provisions of this update will be effective for
us in fiscal 2012 and we are currently evaluating the impact of the pending adoption of ASU 2010-06
on our consolidated financial statements.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
During the first three months of fiscal 2011, there were no significant changes to our quantitative
and qualitative disclosures about market risk. Please refer to Part II, Item 7A. Quantitative and
Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for our fiscal
year ended November 30, 2010 for a more complete discussion of the market risks we encounter.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
(a) Evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures. Under the supervision and with the
participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer,
we conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure
controls and procedures, as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the
Exchange Act, as of the end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. Based on
this evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that, as of the
end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, our disclosure controls and
procedures were effective at the reasonable assurance level to ensure that information required to
be disclosed by us in reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed,
summarized and reported within the time periods specified in SEC rules and forms, and that such
information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive
Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required
disclosure.
(b) Changes in internal control over financial reporting. No changes in our internal control over
financial reporting occurred during the quarter ended February 28, 2011 that have materially
affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial
reporting. In order to enhance our internal control over financial reporting, we implemented a new
consolidation and reporting application in the first quarter of fiscal 2011.
23
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
We are subject to various legal proceedings and claims, either asserted or unasserted, which arise
in the ordinary course of business. While the outcome of these claims cannot be predicted with
certainty, management does not believe that the outcome of any of these other legal matters will
have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial position or results of operations.
On January 21, 2010, JuxtaComm Technologies (JuxtaComm) filed a complaint in the Eastern District
of Texas against Progress Software, two of our subsidiaries and 19 other defendants, alleging
infringement of JuxtaComms US patent 6,195,662 (System for Transforming and Exchanging Data
Between Distributed Heterogeneous Computer Systems). In its complaint, JuxtaComm alleges that
certain of the products within our Sonic, Fuse, DataDirect Connect and DataServices product sets
infringe JuxtaComms patent. In its complaint, JuxtaComm seeks unspecified monetary damages and
permanent injunctive relief.
In May 2010, we filed a response to this complaint in which we denied all claims. The discovery
phase of this litigation has commenced. Trial is scheduled for January 3, 2012.
We intend to defend the action vigorously. While we believe that we have valid defenses to
JuxtaComms claims, litigation is inherently unpredictable and we cannot make an estimate of the
range of potential loss. It is possible that our business, financial position, or results of
operations could be negatively affected by an unfavorable resolution of this action.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
We operate in a rapidly changing environment that involves certain risks and uncertainties, some of
which are beyond our control. In addition to the information provided in this report, please refer
to Part I, Item 1A (Risk Factors) in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
November 30, 2010 for a more complete discussion regarding certain factors that could materially
affect our business, financial condition or future results.
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
Items 2(a) and 2(b) are not applicable.
(c) Stock Repurchases
Information related to our repurchases of our common stock by month in the first quarter of fiscal
2011 is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands, except per share data) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Number of |
|
|
Approximate Dollar Value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares Purchased |
|
|
Of Shares that May |
|
|
|
Total Number |
|
|
Average |
|
|
as Part of Publicly |
|
|
Yet Be Purchased |
|
|
|
Of Shares |
|
|
Price Paid |
|
|
Announced Plans |
|
|
Under the Plans or |
|
Period: |
|
Purchased |
|
|
per Share |
|
|
or Programs |
|
|
Programs (1) |
|
|
December 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
100,000 |
|
January 2011 |
|
|
512 |
|
|
$ |
28.89 |
|
|
|
512 |
|
|
|
85,201 |
|
February 2011 |
|
|
335 |
|
|
$ |
30.44 |
|
|
|
335 |
|
|
|
75,023 |
|
|
Total |
|
|
847 |
|
|
$ |
29.50 |
|
|
|
847 |
|
|
$ |
75,023 |
|
|
(1) |
|
On October 1, 2010, the Board of Directors authorized, for the period from October 1, 2010
through September 30, 2011, the purchase of up to $100 million of our common stock, at such times
that management deems such purchases to be an effective use of cash. |
24
Item 6. Exhibits
The following exhibits are filed or furnished as part of this quarterly report on Form 10-Q:
|
|
|
Exhibit No. |
|
Description |
|
|
|
31.1*
|
|
Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act Richard D. Reidy |
|
|
|
31.2*
|
|
Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act Charles F. Wagner, Jr. |
|
|
|
32.1**
|
|
Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act |
|
|
|
101***
|
|
The following materials from Progress Software Corporations Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q for the three months ended February 28, 2011, formatted in XBRL (eXtensible Business
Reporting Language): (i) Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets
as of February 28, 2011 and
November 30, 2010; (ii) Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three
months ended February 28, 2011 and February 28, 2010; (iii) Condensed Consolidated
Statements of Cash Flows for the three months ended February 28, 2011 and February 28,
2010 and (iv) Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements. |
|
|
|
* |
|
Filed herewith |
|
** |
|
Furnished herewith |
|
*** |
|
Pursuant to Rule 406T of Regulation S-T, the Interactive Data Files on Exhibit 101 hereto are
deemed not filed or part of a registration statement or prospectus for purposes of Sections 11 or
12 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, are deemed not filed for purposes of Section 18 of
the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and otherwise are not subject to liability
under those sections. |
25
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
PROGRESS SOFTWARE CORPORATION
(Registrant)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dated: April 11, 2011 |
/s/ Richard D. Reidy
|
|
|
Richard D. Reidy |
|
|
President and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer) |
|
|
|
|
|
Dated: April 11, 2011 |
/s/ Charles F. Wagner, Jr.
|
|
|
Charles F. Wagner, Jr. |
|
|
Executive Vice President, Finance and
Administration and Chief Financial
Officer (Principal Financial
Officer) |
|
|
|
|
|
Dated: April 11, 2011 |
/s/ David H. Benton, Jr.
|
|
|
David H. Benton, Jr. |
|
|
Vice President and Corporate Controller
(Principal Accounting Officer) |
|
|
26