Form 10-Q
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D. C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(MARK ONE)
|
|
|
þ |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2010
OR
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSISTION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission File Number 0-12015
HEALTHCARE SERVICES GROUP, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Pennsylvania
|
|
23-2018365 |
|
|
|
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer Identification
number) |
|
|
|
3220 Tillman Drive-Suite 300, Bensalem, Pennsylvania
|
|
19020 |
|
|
|
(Address of principal executive office)
|
|
(Zip code) |
Registrants telephone number, including area code: 215-639-4274
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed
by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or
for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
YES þ NO o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months
(or such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
YES þ NO o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated
filer a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definition of large accelerated
filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer þ
|
|
Accelerated filer o
|
|
Non-accelerated filer o
|
|
Smaller reporting company o |
|
|
|
|
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
|
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of
the Exchange Act). YES o NO þ
APPLICABLE ONLY TO CORPORATE ISSUERS:
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuers classes of common stock, as
of the latest practicable date. Common Stock, $.01 Par Value: 43,936,000 shares outstanding as of
October 22, 2010.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2010 |
|
|
December 31, 2009 |
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
26,109,000 |
|
|
$ |
31,301,000 |
|
Marketable securities, at fair value |
|
|
44,498,000 |
|
|
|
52,648,000 |
|
Accounts and notes receivable, less allowance for doubtful accounts of
$5,483,000 in 2010 and $4,640,000 in 2009 |
|
|
108,363,000 |
|
|
|
104,356,000 |
|
Inventories and supplies |
|
|
18,858,000 |
|
|
|
16,974,000 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
667,000 |
|
|
|
115,000 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other |
|
|
4,825,000 |
|
|
|
6,776,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
203,320,000 |
|
|
|
212,170,000 |
|
Property and equipment: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Laundry and linen equipment installations |
|
|
1,774,000 |
|
|
|
1,695,000 |
|
Housekeeping equipment and office furniture |
|
|
19,002,000 |
|
|
|
16,905,000 |
|
Autos and trucks |
|
|
259,000 |
|
|
|
278,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,035,000 |
|
|
|
18,878,000 |
|
Less accumulated depreciation |
|
|
15,444,000 |
|
|
|
14,487,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,591,000 |
|
|
|
4,391,000 |
|
GOODWILL |
|
|
16,955,000 |
|
|
|
17,087,000 |
|
OTHER INTANGIBLE ASSETS, less accumulated amortization of
$5,470,000 in 2010 and $4,038,000 in 2009 |
|
|
7,730,000 |
|
|
|
8,862,000 |
|
NOTES RECEIVABLE long term portion, net of discount |
|
|
6,084,000 |
|
|
|
4,623,000 |
|
DEFERRED COMPENSATION FUNDING, at fair value |
|
|
12,510,000 |
|
|
|
10,783,000 |
|
DEFERRED INCOME TAXES long term portion |
|
|
10,040,000 |
|
|
|
7,907,000 |
|
OTHER NONCURRENT ASSETS |
|
|
42,000 |
|
|
|
69,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL ASSETS |
|
$ |
262,272,000 |
|
|
$ |
265,892,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes.
3
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2010 |
|
|
December 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable |
|
$ |
7,636,000 |
|
|
$ |
9,134,000 |
|
Accrued payroll, accrued and withheld payroll taxes |
|
|
8,494,000 |
|
|
|
17,647,000 |
|
Other accrued expenses |
|
|
1,841,000 |
|
|
|
3,057,000 |
|
Income taxes payable |
|
|
215,000 |
|
|
|
35,000 |
|
Accrued insurance claims |
|
|
6,032,000 |
|
|
|
4,844,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
24,218,000 |
|
|
|
34,717,000 |
|
ACCRUED INSURANCE CLAIMS long term portion |
|
|
14,074,000 |
|
|
|
11,302,000 |
|
DEFERRED COMPENSATION LIABILITY |
|
|
12,837,000 |
|
|
|
11,099,000 |
|
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $.01 par value; 100,000,000 shares authorized;
46,049,000 shares issued in 2010 and 45,792,000 shares in 2009 |
|
|
460,000 |
|
|
|
458,000 |
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
97,474,000 |
|
|
|
92,339,000 |
|
Retained earnings |
|
|
132,130,000 |
|
|
|
135,837,000 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income, net of taxes |
|
|
152,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock in treasury, at cost, 2,123,000 shares in 2010 and
2,211,000 shares in 2009 |
|
|
(19,073,000 |
) |
|
|
(19,860,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
211,143,000 |
|
|
|
208,774,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
$ |
262,272,000 |
|
|
$ |
265,892,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes.
4
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months Ended |
|
|
For the Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
$ |
195,114,000 |
|
|
$ |
178,829,000 |
|
|
$ |
571,868,000 |
|
|
$ |
510,134,000 |
|
Operating costs and expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs of services provided |
|
|
168,384,000 |
|
|
|
155,228,000 |
|
|
|
492,196,000 |
|
|
|
438,950,000 |
|
Selling, general and administrative |
|
|
14,488,000 |
|
|
|
11,936,000 |
|
|
|
41,539,000 |
|
|
|
36,328,000 |
|
Other income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment and interest |
|
|
1,182,000 |
|
|
|
1,709,000 |
|
|
|
1,549,000 |
|
|
|
3,803,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes |
|
|
13,424,000 |
|
|
|
13,374,000 |
|
|
|
39,682,000 |
|
|
|
38,659,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income taxes |
|
|
4,255,000 |
|
|
|
5,149,000 |
|
|
|
14,364,000 |
|
|
|
14,883,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
9,169,000 |
|
|
$ |
8,225,000 |
|
|
$ |
25,318,000 |
|
|
$ |
23,776,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings per common share |
|
$ |
0.21 |
|
|
$ |
0.19 |
|
|
$ |
0.58 |
|
|
$ |
0.55 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per common share |
|
$ |
0.21 |
|
|
$ |
0.19 |
|
|
$ |
0.57 |
|
|
$ |
0.54 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash dividends per common share |
|
$ |
0.23 |
|
|
$ |
0.19 |
|
|
$ |
0.66 |
|
|
$ |
0.54 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of common
shares outstanding |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
44,026,000 |
|
|
|
43,626,000 |
|
|
|
43,964,000 |
|
|
|
43,540,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
|
44,719,000 |
|
|
|
44,334,000 |
|
|
|
44,677,000 |
|
|
|
44,224,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes.
5
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOW
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
|
|
For the Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Cash flows from operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
25,318,000 |
|
|
$ |
23,776,000 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash
provided by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
2,725,000 |
|
|
|
2,336,000 |
|
Bad debt provision |
|
|
1,550,000 |
|
|
|
1,956,000 |
|
Deferred income tax benefits |
|
|
(2,685,000 |
) |
|
|
(1,269,000 |
) |
Stock-based compensation expense |
|
|
947,000 |
|
|
|
739,000 |
|
Amortization of premium on marketable securities |
|
|
623,000 |
|
|
|
702,000 |
|
Unrealized (gain) loss on marketable securities |
|
|
849,000 |
|
|
|
(589,000 |
) |
Unrealized gain on deferred compensation fund investments |
|
|
(476,000 |
) |
|
|
(1,454,000 |
) |
Changes in operating assets and liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts and notes receivable |
|
|
(5,557,000 |
) |
|
|
(10,119,000 |
) |
Prepaid income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,838,000 |
|
Inventories and supplies |
|
|
(1,883,000 |
) |
|
|
(449,000 |
) |
Notes receivable long term portion |
|
|
(1,461,000 |
) |
|
|
(2,192,000 |
) |
Deferred compensation funding |
|
|
(1,250,000 |
) |
|
|
(500,000 |
) |
Accounts payable and other accrued expenses |
|
|
(2,529,000 |
) |
|
|
(261,000 |
) |
Accrued payroll, accrued and withheld payroll taxes |
|
|
(8,499,000 |
) |
|
|
10,025,000 |
|
Accrued insurance claims |
|
|
3,960,000 |
|
|
|
2,864,000 |
|
Deferred compensation liability |
|
|
2,055,000 |
|
|
|
2,202,000 |
|
Income taxes payable |
|
|
180,000 |
|
|
|
329,000 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other assets |
|
|
1,809,000 |
|
|
|
4,244,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
15,676,000 |
|
|
|
35,178,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Disposals of fixed assets |
|
|
44,000 |
|
|
|
219,000 |
|
Additions to property and equipment |
|
|
(2,537,000 |
) |
|
|
(1,593,000 |
) |
Purchases of marketable securities, net |
|
|
(33,963,000 |
) |
|
|
(12,699,000 |
) |
Sales of marketable securities, net |
|
|
40,792,000 |
|
|
|
10,405,000 |
|
Cash paid for acquisition |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,613,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities |
|
|
4,336,000 |
|
|
|
(8,281,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends paid |
|
|
(29,025,000 |
) |
|
|
(23,506,000 |
) |
Repayment of debt assumed in acquisition |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,718,000 |
) |
Reissuance of treasury stock pursuant to Dividend Reinvestment Plan |
|
|
89,000 |
|
|
|
64,000 |
|
Tax benefit from equity compensation plans |
|
|
1,262,000 |
|
|
|
373,000 |
|
Proceeds from the exercise of stock options |
|
|
2,470,000 |
|
|
|
826,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in financing activities |
|
|
(25,204,000 |
) |
|
|
(26,961,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
(5,192,000 |
) |
|
|
(64,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of the period |
|
|
31,301,000 |
|
|
|
37,501,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of the period |
|
$ |
26,109,000 |
|
|
$ |
37,437,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplementary Cash Flow Information: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income taxes cash payments, net of refunds |
|
$ |
15,607,000 |
|
|
$ |
12,612,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of 66,000 shares of Common Stock related to acquisition in 2009 |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
4,494,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of 49,000 shares of Common Stock in both 2010 and 2009 pursuant to Employee
Stock Plans |
|
$ |
1,047,000 |
|
|
$ |
777,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes.
6
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional |
|
|
Accumulated Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paid-in |
|
|
Comprehensive |
|
|
Retained |
|
|
Treasury |
|
|
Stockholders |
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Capital |
|
|
Income |
|
|
Earnings |
|
|
Stock |
|
|
Equity |
|
Balance, December 31, 2009 |
|
|
45,792,000 |
|
|
$ |
458,000 |
|
|
$ |
92,339,000 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
135,837,000 |
|
|
$ |
(19,860,000 |
) |
|
$ |
208,774,000 |
|
Comprehensive income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income for the period |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,318,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,318,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized gain on available for sale
marketable securities, net of taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
152,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
152,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,470,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise of stock options and other stock-
based compensation, net of 9,000 shares
tendered for payment |
|
|
257,000 |
|
|
|
2,000 |
|
|
|
2,211,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
257,000 |
|
|
|
2,470,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax benefit from equity compensation
plans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,262,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,262,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share-based compensation expense
stock options |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
740,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
740,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Treasury shares issued for Deferred
Compensation Plan funding and
redemptions (6,000 shares) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
260,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
56,000 |
|
|
|
316,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares issued pursuant to Employee
Stock Plans (49,000 shares) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
609,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
438,000 |
|
|
|
1,047,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash dividends $0.66 per common
share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(29,025,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(29,025,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares issued pursuant to Dividend
Reinvestment Plan (4,000 shares) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
53,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36,000 |
|
|
|
89,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, September 30, 2010 |
|
|
46,049,000 |
|
|
$ |
460,000 |
|
|
$ |
97,474,000 |
|
|
$ |
152,000 |
|
|
$ |
132,130,000 |
|
|
$ |
(19,073,000 |
) |
|
$ |
211,143,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes.
7
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
Note 1 Basis of Reporting
The accompanying financial statements are unaudited and do not include certain information and
note disclosures required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States for
complete financial statements. However, in our opinion, all adjustments (consisting of normal
recurring adjustments) considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included. The balance
sheet shown in this report as of December 31, 2009 has been derived from, and does not include, all
the disclosures contained in the financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2009. The
financial statements should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and notes thereto
included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009. The results of
operations for the three and nine month period ended September 30, 2010 are not necessarily
indicative of the results that may be expected for the full fiscal year.
As of September 30, 2010, we operate one wholly-owned subsidiary, Huntingdon Holdings, Inc.
(Huntingdon). Huntingdon invests our cash and cash equivalents, as well as manages our portfolio
of marketable securities.
In preparing financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted
in the United States of America (U.S. GAAP), we make estimates and assumptions that affect the
reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities at
the date of the financial statements, as well as the reported amounts of revenues and expenses
during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Significant
estimates are used for, but not limited to, our allowance for doubtful accounts, accrued insurance
claims, asset valuations and review for potential impairment, stock-based compensation, and
deferred tax benefits. The estimates are based upon various factors including current and
historical trends, as well as other pertinent industry and regulatory authority information. We
regularly evaluate this information to determine if it is necessary to update the basis for our
estimates and to compensate for known changes.
Inventories and supplies include housekeeping, linen and laundry supplies, as well as dietary
provisions and supplies. Inventories and supplies are stated at cost to approximate a first-in,
first-out (FIFO) basis. Linen supplies are amortized over a 24 month period.
Revenues from services provided and equipment sales are recorded net of sales taxes.
Note 2 Acquisition
On May 1, 2009, we acquired essentially all of the assets of Contract Environmental Services,
Inc. (CES), a South Carolina based corporation which is a provider of professional housekeeping,
laundry and dietary department services to long-term care and related facilities. We believe the
acquisition of CES expands and compliments our position of being the largest provider of such
services to long-term care and related facilities in the United States. The aggregate consideration
was approximately $13,825,000 consisting of: (i) $4,613,000 in cash, (ii) issuance of approximately
66,000 shares of our common stock (valued at approximately $1,183,000) future issuance of
approximately 265,000 shares (valued at approximately $3,311,000) contingent upon the achievement
of certain financial targets, and (iii) the repayment of approximately $4,718,000 of certain debt
obligations of CES. The final allocation of such consideration resulted in our recording of the
following: (i) approximately $8,998,000 of tangible assets consisting primarily of accounts
receivable, (ii) $5,700,000 of amortizable intangible assets, (iii) $1,936,000 of goodwill and (iv)
current liabilities of approximately $2,809,000. The CES results of operations are not included in
our consolidated results of operations before May 1, 2009, which was prior to the closing of the
transaction. Effective January 1, 2010, all of CES operations were fully integrated with our
operations.
8
Note 3 Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
Goodwill represents the excess of the purchase price over the fair value of net assets
acquired of businesses and is not amortized. Goodwill is evaluated for impairment on an annual
basis, or more frequently if impairment indicators arise, using a fair-value-based test that
compares the fair value of the asset to its carrying value. The goodwill associated with the CES
acquisition is deductible for tax purposes over a fifteen year period.
The following table sets forth goodwill by reportable operating segment, as described in Note
6 herein, and the changes in the carrying amounts of goodwill for the nine month period ended
September 30, 2010.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Housekeeping |
|
|
Dietary |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment |
|
|
Segment |
|
|
Total |
|
Balance as of December 31, 2009 |
|
$ |
14,913,000 |
|
|
$ |
2,174,000 |
|
|
$ |
17,087,000 |
|
Goodwill adjusted for final purchase price adjustments |
|
|
(19,000 |
) |
|
|
(113,000 |
) |
|
|
(132,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of September 30, 2010 |
|
$ |
14,894,000 |
|
|
$ |
2,061,000 |
|
|
$ |
16,955,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The cost of intangible assets is based on fair values at the date of acquisition. Intangible
assets with determinable lives are amortized on a straight-line basis over their estimated useful
life (between 7 and 8 years). The following table sets forth the amounts of our identifiable
intangible assets subject to amortization, which were acquired in acquisitions.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Customer relationships |
|
$ |
12,400,000 |
|
|
$ |
12,100,000 |
|
Non-compete agreements |
|
|
800,000 |
|
|
|
800,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other intangibles, gross |
|
$ |
13,200,000 |
|
|
$ |
12,900,000 |
|
Less accumulated amortization |
|
|
(5,470,000 |
) |
|
|
(4,038,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other intangibles, net |
|
$ |
7,730,000 |
|
|
$ |
8,862,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The customer relationships have a weighted-average amortization period of seven years and the
non-compete agreements have a weighted-average amortization period of eight years. The following
table sets forth the estimated amortization expense for intangibles subject to amortization for the
following five fiscal years:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Customer |
|
|
Non-Compete |
|
|
|
|
Period/Year |
|
Relationships |
|
|
Agreements |
|
|
Total |
|
October 1 to December 31, 2010 |
|
$ |
443,000 |
|
|
$ |
25,000 |
|
|
$ |
468,000 |
|
2011 |
|
|
1,771,000 |
|
|
|
100,000 |
|
|
|
1,871,000 |
|
2012 |
|
|
1,771,000 |
|
|
|
100,000 |
|
|
|
1,871,000 |
|
2013 |
|
|
1,452,000 |
|
|
|
100,000 |
|
|
|
1,552,000 |
|
2014 |
|
|
814,000 |
|
|
|
67,000 |
|
|
|
881,000 |
|
2015 |
|
|
814,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
814,000 |
|
Amortization expense for the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2010 were
$468,000 and $1,432,000, respectively.
9
Note 4 Fair Value Measurements and Marketable Securities
We, in accordance with U.S. GAAP, define fair value as the price that would be received to
sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants
at the measurement date (exit price). Effective January 1, 2008, we elected the fair value option
for certain of our marketable securities purchased since such adoption. Management initially
elected the fair value option for certain of our marketable securities because it views such
investment securities as highly liquid and available to be drawn upon for working capital purposes
making them similar to its cash and cash equivalents. Accordingly, we record net unrealized gain
or loss in the other income, investment and interest caption in our consolidated income statements
for such investments. We have not elected the fair value option for marketable securities acquired
after December 31, 2009. Although these assets continue to be highly liquid and available, we do
not believe these assets are representative of our operating activities. These assets are
representative of our investing activities, and they will be available for future needs of the
Company to support its current and projected growth.
Certain of our assets and liabilities are reported at fair value in the accompanying balance
sheets. Such assets and liabilities include cash and cash equivalents, marketable securities,
accounts and notes receivable, and accounts payable (including income taxes payable and accrued
expenses). The following tables provide fair value measurement information for our marketable
securities and deferred compensation fund investment assets as of September 30, 2010 and December
31, 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of September 30, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurement Using: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted Prices |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Significant |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
in Active |
|
|
Significant Other |
|
|
Unobservable |
|
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
Total Fair |
|
|
Markets |
|
|
Observable Inputs |
|
|
Inputs |
|
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Value |
|
|
(Level 1) |
|
|
(Level 2) |
|
|
(Level 3) |
|
Financial Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Marketable securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Municipal bonds |
|
$ |
44,498,000 |
|
|
$ |
44,498,000 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
44,498,000 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Equity securities Deferred comp fund |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Money Market |
|
$ |
4,174,000 |
|
|
$ |
4,174,000 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
4,174,000 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Large Cap Value |
|
|
2,160,000 |
|
|
|
2,160,000 |
|
|
|
2,160,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large Cap Growth |
|
|
1,925,000 |
|
|
|
1,925,000 |
|
|
|
1,925,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Small Cap Value |
|
|
930,000 |
|
|
|
930,000 |
|
|
|
930,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed Income |
|
|
927,000 |
|
|
|
927,000 |
|
|
|
927,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Speciality |
|
|
668,000 |
|
|
|
668,000 |
|
|
|
668,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balanced and Lifestyle |
|
|
511,000 |
|
|
|
511,000 |
|
|
|
511,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
International |
|
|
505,000 |
|
|
|
505,000 |
|
|
|
505,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large Cap Blend |
|
|
392,000 |
|
|
|
392,000 |
|
|
|
392,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mid Cap Growth |
|
|
318,000 |
|
|
|
318,000 |
|
|
|
318,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity securities Deferred comp fund |
|
$ |
12,510,000 |
|
|
$ |
12,510,000 |
|
|
$ |
8,336,000 |
|
|
$ |
4,174,000 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurement Using: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted Prices |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Significant |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
in Active |
|
|
Significant Other |
|
|
Unobservable |
|
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
Total Fair |
|
|
Markets |
|
|
Observable Inputs |
|
|
Inputs |
|
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Value |
|
|
(Level 1) |
|
|
(Level 2) |
|
|
(Level 3) |
|
Financial Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Marketable securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Municipal bonds |
|
$ |
52,648,000 |
|
|
$ |
52,648,000 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
52,648,000 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Equity securities Deferred comp fund |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Money Market |
|
$ |
3,588,000 |
|
|
$ |
3,588,000 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
3,588,000 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Large Cap Value |
|
|
1,893,000 |
|
|
|
1,893,000 |
|
|
|
1,893,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large Cap Growth |
|
|
1,833,000 |
|
|
|
1,833,000 |
|
|
|
1,833,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Small Cap Value |
|
|
822,000 |
|
|
|
822,000 |
|
|
|
822,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed Income |
|
|
664,000 |
|
|
|
664,000 |
|
|
|
664,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Speciality |
|
|
523,000 |
|
|
|
523,000 |
|
|
|
523,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balanced and Lifestyle |
|
|
413,000 |
|
|
|
413,000 |
|
|
|
413,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
International |
|
|
453,000 |
|
|
|
453,000 |
|
|
|
453,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large Cap Blend |
|
|
326,000 |
|
|
|
326,000 |
|
|
|
326,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mid Cap Growth |
|
|
268,000 |
|
|
|
268,000 |
|
|
|
268,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity securities Deferred comp fund |
|
$ |
10,783,000 |
|
|
$ |
10,783,000 |
|
|
$ |
7,195,000 |
|
|
$ |
3,588,000 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The fair value of the municipal bonds is measured using pricing service data from an external
provider. The fair value of equity investments in the funded deferred compensation plan are valued
(Level 1) based on quoted market prices. The money market fund in the funded deferred compensation
plan is valued (Level 2) at the net asset value (NAV) of the shares held by the plan at the end
of the period. As a practical expedient, fair value of our money market fund is valued at the NAV
as determined by the custodian of the fund. The money market fund includes short-term United States
dollar denominated money-market instruments. The money market fund can be redeemed at its NAV at
its measurement date as there are no significant restrictions on the ability of participants to
sell this investment.
For the three and nine month period ended September 30, 2010, the other income investment
and interest caption on our consolidated statements of income includes an unrealized loss from
marketable securities of $191,000 and $849,000, respectively, for investments recorded under the
fair value option. For the three and nine month period ended September 30, 2009, the other
income/(loss) investment and interest caption on our consolidated statements of income includes
an unrealized gain from marketable securities of $217,000 and $589,000, respectively, for
investments recorded under the fair value option. For the three and nine month period ended
September 30, 2010, the accumulated other comprehensive income on our consolidated balance sheet
and stockholders equity includes unrealized gains from marketable securities of $120,000 and
$152,000, respectively, related to marketable securities that are not recognized under the fair
value option in accordance with U.S. GAAP.
11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other-than- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Estimated Fair |
|
|
temporary |
|
September 30, 2010 |
|
Amortized Cost |
|
|
Gains |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Impairments |
|
Type of security: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Municipal bonds |
|
$ |
20,986,000 |
|
|
$ |
802,000 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
21,788,000 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Municipal bonds available for sale |
|
|
22,558,000 |
|
|
|
152,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,710,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total debt securities |
|
$ |
43,544,000 |
|
|
$ |
954,000 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
44,498,000 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other-than- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Estimated Fair |
|
|
temporary |
|
December 31, 2009 |
|
Amortized Cost |
|
|
Gains |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Impairments |
|
Type of security: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Municipal bonds |
|
$ |
50,997,000 |
|
|
$ |
1,651,000 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
52,648,000 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total debt securities |
|
$ |
50,997,000 |
|
|
$ |
1,651,000 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
52,648,000 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The contractual maturities of available for sale investments held at September 30, 2010 and
December 31, 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
Contractual maturity: |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Maturing in one year or less |
|
$ |
227,000 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Maturing after one year through three years |
|
|
17,654,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Maturing after three years |
|
|
4,829,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total available for sale debt securities |
|
$ |
22,710,000 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 5 Other Contingencies
We have a $36,000,000 bank line of credit on which we may draw to meet short-term liquidity
requirements in excess of internally generated cash flow. Amounts drawn under the line of credit
are payable upon demand. At September 30, 2010, there were no borrowings under the line of credit.
However, at such date, we had outstanding a $35,420,000 irrevocable standby letter of credit which
relates to payment obligations under our insurance programs. As a result of the letters of credit
issued, the amount available under the line of credit was reduced by $35,420,000 at September 30,
2010. The line of credit requires us to satisfy two financial covenants. We are in compliance with
the financial covenants at September 30, 2010 and expect to continue to remain in compliance with
such financial covenants. This line of credit expires on June 30, 2011. We believe the line of
credit will be renewed at that time.
We provide our services in 47 states and we are subject to numerous local taxing jurisdictions
within those states. Consequently, the taxability of our services is subject to various
interpretations within these jurisdictions. In the ordinary course of business, a jurisdiction may
contest our reporting positions with respect to the application of its tax code to our services,
which may result in additional tax liabilities.
We have tax matters with various taxing authorities. Because of the uncertainties related to
both the probable outcomes and amount of probable assessments due, we are unable to make a
reasonable estimate of liability. We do not expect the resolution of any of these matters, taken
individually or in the aggregate, to have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial
position or results of operations based on our best estimate of the outcomes of such matters.
We are also subject to various claims and legal actions in the ordinary course of business.
Some of these matters include payroll and employee-related matters and examinations by
governmental agencies. As we become aware of such claims and legal actions, we provide accruals if
the exposures are probable and estimable. If an adverse outcome of such claims and legal actions
is reasonably possible, we assess materiality and provide such financial disclosure, as
appropriate. We believe that these matters, taken individually or in the aggregate, would not have
a material adverse effect on our financial position or results of operations.
12
As a result of the current economic crisis, many states have significant budget deficits.
State Medicaid programs are experiencing increased demand, and with lower revenues than projected,
they have fewer resources to support their Medicaid programs. In addition, in March 2010,
comprehensive health care legislation under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act and the
Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010 (together, the Act) was signed into law. The
Act will significantly impact the governmental healthcare programs which our clients participate,
and reimbursements received thereunder from governmental or third-party payors. Furthermore, in the
coming year, new proposals or additional changes in existing regulations could be made to the Act
which could directly impact the governmental reimbursement programs in which our clients
participate. As a result, some state Medicaid programs are reconsidering previously approved
increases in nursing home reimbursement or are considering delaying or foregoing those increases.
A few states have indicated it is possible they will run out of cash to pay Medicaid providers,
including nursing homes. Any negative changes in our clients reimbursements may negatively impact
our results of operations. Although we are currently evaluating the Acts effect on our client
base, we may not know the full effect until such a time as these laws are fully implemented and the
Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services and other agencies issue applicable regulations or
guidance.
Note 6 Segment Information
Reportable Operating Segments
We manage and evaluate our operations in two reportable segments. The two reportable segments
are Housekeeping (housekeeping, laundry, linen and other services), and Dietary (dietary department
services). Although both segments serve the same client base and share many operational
similarities, they are managed separately due to distinct differences in the type of service
provided, as well as the specialized expertise required of the professional management personnel
responsible for delivering the respective segments services. We consider the various services
provided within each reportable segment to comprise an identifiable reportable operating segment
since such services are rendered pursuant to a single service agreement, specific to that
reportable segment, as well as the fact that the delivery of the respective reportable segments
services are managed by the same management personnel of the particular reportable segment.
Differences between the reportable segments operating results and other disclosed data and
our consolidated financial statements relate primarily to corporate level transactions and
recording of transactions at the reportable segment level which use methods other than generally
accepted accounting principles. Additionally, included in the differences between the reportable
segments operating results and other disclosed data are amounts attributable to Huntingdon, our
investment holding company subsidiary. Huntingdon does not transact any business with the
reportable segments. Segment amounts disclosed are prior to any elimination entries made in
consolidation.
13
Housekeeping provides services in Canada, although essentially all of its revenues and net
income, 99% in both categories, are earned in one geographic area, the United States. Dietary
provides services solely in the United States.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Housekeeping |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Services |
|
|
Dietary Services |
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
Total |
|
Three Months Ended September 30, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
$ |
151,265,000 |
|
|
$ |
43,771,000 |
|
|
$ |
78,000 |
(1) |
|
$ |
195,114,000 |
|
Income before income taxes |
|
|
14,040,000 |
|
|
|
1,558,000 |
|
|
|
(2,174,000 |
) (1) |
|
|
13,424,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
$ |
136,496,000 |
|
|
$ |
42,322,000 |
|
|
$ |
11,000 |
(1) |
|
$ |
178,829,000 |
|
Income before income taxes |
|
|
12,908,000 |
|
|
|
1,431,000 |
|
|
|
(965,000 |
) (1) |
|
|
13,374,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
$ |
441,680,000 |
|
|
$ |
130,145,000 |
|
|
$ |
43,000 |
(1) |
|
$ |
571,868,000 |
|
Income before income taxes |
|
|
43,390,000 |
|
|
|
5,867,000 |
|
|
|
(9,575,000 |
) (1) |
|
|
39,682,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
$ |
393,431,000 |
|
|
$ |
116,567,000 |
|
|
$ |
136,000 |
(1) |
|
$ |
510,134,000 |
|
Income before income taxes |
|
|
38,528,000 |
|
|
|
5,194,000 |
|
|
|
(5,063,000 |
) (1) |
|
|
38,659,000 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Represents primarily corporate office cost and related overhead, recording of
transactions at the reportable segment level which use methods other than U.S. GAAP and
consolidated subsidiaries operating expenses that are not allocated to the reportable
segments, net of investment and interest income. |
14
Total Consolidated Revenues from Clients
The following revenues earned from clients represent their reporting in accordance with U.S.
GAAP and differ from segment revenues reported above due to the inclusion of adjustments used for
segment reporting purposes by management. We earned total revenues from clients in the following
service categories:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Housekeeping services |
|
$ |
101,118,000 |
|
|
$ |
92,459,000 |
|
Laundry and linen services |
|
|
49,493,000 |
|
|
|
43,465,000 |
|
Dietary services |
|
|
43,883,000 |
|
|
|
42,305,000 |
|
Maintenance services and other |
|
|
620,000 |
|
|
|
600,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
195,114,000 |
|
|
$ |
178,829,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Housekeeping services |
|
$ |
296,453,000 |
|
|
$ |
267,602,000 |
|
Laundry and linen services |
|
|
143,619,000 |
|
|
|
124,205,000 |
|
Dietary services |
|
|
130,085,000 |
|
|
|
116,527,000 |
|
Maintenance services and other |
|
|
1,711,000 |
|
|
|
1,800,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
571,868,000 |
|
|
$ |
510,134,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Major Client
We have one client, a nursing home chain (Major Client), which accounted for the respective
percentages of our revenues as detailed below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Total revenues |
|
|
11 |
% |
|
|
12 |
% |
Housekeeping |
|
|
11 |
% |
|
|
12 |
% |
Dietary services |
|
|
9 |
% |
|
|
11 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Total revenues |
|
|
11 |
% |
|
|
13 |
% |
Housekeeping |
|
|
11 |
% |
|
|
13 |
% |
Dietary services |
|
|
9 |
% |
|
|
12 |
% |
Additionally, at both September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, amounts due from such client
represented less than 1% of our accounts receivable balance. The loss of such client, or a
significant reduction in revenues from such client, would have a material adverse effect on the
results of operations of our two operating segments. In addition, if such client changes its
payment terms it would increase our accounts receivable balance and have a material adverse effect
on our cash flows and cash and cash equivalents.
15
Note 7 Earnings Per Common Share
A reconciliation of the numerator and denominator of basic and diluted earnings per common
share is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months ended September 30, 2010 |
|
|
|
Income |
|
|
Shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Numerator) |
|
|
(Denominator) |
|
|
Per-share Amount |
|
Net income |
|
$ |
9,169,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings per common share |
|
$ |
9,169,000 |
|
|
|
44,026,000 |
|
|
$ |
.21 |
|
Effect of dilutive securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options |
|
|
|
|
|
|
693,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per common share |
|
$ |
9,169,000 |
|
|
|
44,719,000 |
|
|
$ |
.21 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months ended September 30, 2009 |
|
|
|
Income |
|
|
Shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Numerator) |
|
|
(Denominator) |
|
|
Per-share Amount |
|
Net income |
|
$ |
8,225,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings per common share |
|
$ |
8,225,000 |
|
|
|
43,626,000 |
|
|
$ |
.19 |
|
Effect of dilutive securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options |
|
|
|
|
|
|
708,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per common share |
|
$ |
8,225,000 |
|
|
|
44,334,000 |
|
|
$ |
.19 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months ended September 30, 2010 |
|
|
|
Income |
|
|
Shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Numerator) |
|
|
(Denominator) |
|
|
Per-share Amount |
|
Net income |
|
$ |
25,318,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings per common share |
|
$ |
25,318,000 |
|
|
|
43,964,000 |
|
|
$ |
.58 |
|
Effect of dilutive securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options |
|
|
|
|
|
|
713,000 |
|
|
|
(.01 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per common share |
|
$ |
25,318,000 |
|
|
|
44,677,000 |
|
|
$ |
.57 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months ended September 30, 2009 |
|
|
|
Income |
|
|
Shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Numerator) |
|
|
(Denominator) |
|
|
Per-share Amount |
|
Net income |
|
$ |
23,776,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings per common share |
|
$ |
23,776,000 |
|
|
|
43,540,000 |
|
|
$ |
.55 |
|
Effect of dilutive securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options |
|
|
|
|
|
|
684,000 |
|
|
|
(.01 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per common share |
|
$ |
23,776,000 |
|
|
|
44,224,000 |
|
|
$ |
.54 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16
No outstanding options were excluded from the computations of diluted earnings per common
share for the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2010 as no options have an exercise
price in excess of the average market value of our common stock at September 30, 2010.
Options to purchase 353,000 and 358,000 shares of common stock at an average exercise price of
$20.89 per common share were outstanding during the three and nine month periods ended September
30, 2009 but not included in the computation of diluted earnings per common share because the
options exercise prices were greater than the average market price of the common shares, and
therefore, would be antidilutive.
Note 8 Dividends
During the nine month period ended September 30, 2010, we paid regular quarterly cash
dividends totaling $29,025,000 as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months ended |
|
|
|
March 31, 2010 |
|
|
June 30, 2010 |
|
|
September 30, 2010 |
|
Cash dividend per common share |
|
$ |
.21 |
|
|
$ |
.22 |
|
|
$ |
.23 |
|
Total cash dividends paid |
|
$ |
9,224,000 |
|
|
$ |
9,677,000 |
|
|
$ |
10,124,000 |
|
Record date |
|
|
February 12 |
|
|
|
April 23 |
|
|
|
July 23 |
|
Payment date |
|
|
March 5 |
|
|
|
May 14 |
|
|
|
August 6 |
|
On October 12, 2010, our Board of Directors declared a regular quarterly cash dividend of
$.2325 per common share to be paid on November 5, 2010 to shareholders of record as of October 22,
2010.
Additionally, our Board of Directors has declared a three-for-two stock split in the form
of a 50% stock dividend payable on November 12, 2010 to shareholders of record of its Common Stock
at the close of business November 8, 2010. All fractional share interests will be rounded up to the
nearest whole number. The effect of this action will be to increase Common Shares outstanding by
approximately 22,000,000 shares. All per share information presented in this report has not been
affected for the stock dividend.
Note 9 Share-Based Compensation
Stock Options
During the nine month period ended September 30, 2010, the stock option activity under our
2002 Stock Option Plan, 1995 Incentive and Non-Qualified Stock Option Plan for key employees, and
1996 Non-Employee Directors Stock Option Plan (collectively the Stock Option Plans), was as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remaining |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
Number of |
|
|
Contractual |
|
|
Aggregate |
|
|
|
Price |
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Life (In Years) |
|
|
Intrinsic Value |
|
Outstanding, January 1, 2010 |
|
$ |
11.33 |
|
|
|
2,049,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted |
|
|
21.46 |
|
|
|
445,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cancelled |
|
|
18.35 |
|
|
|
(10,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised |
|
|
9.08 |
|
|
|
(295,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding, September 30, 2010 |
|
$ |
13.66 |
|
|
|
2,189,000 |
|
|
|
5.65 |
|
|
$ |
19,988,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options exercisable as of September 30, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,214,000 |
|
|
|
3.37 |
|
|
$ |
16,671,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17
The weighted average fair value of options granted during the 2010 and 2009 nine month periods
ended September 30, 2010 was $5.97 and $4.14, respectively. The following table summarizes
information about stock options outstanding at September 30, 2010.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options |
|
|
|
Options Outstanding |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remaining |
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
Number |
|
|
Contractual |
|
|
Average |
|
|
Number |
|
|
Average |
|
Exercise Price Range |
|
Outstanding |
|
|
Life |
|
|
Exercise price |
|
|
Exercisable |
|
|
Exercise Price |
|
$1.50 2.74 |
|
|
159,000 |
|
|
|
1.15 |
|
|
$ |
2.71 |
|
|
|
159,000 |
|
|
$ |
2.71 |
|
3.01 5.53 |
|
|
437,000 |
|
|
|
2.78 |
|
|
|
4.81 |
|
|
|
437,000 |
|
|
|
4.81 |
|
9.10 9.10 |
|
|
246,000 |
|
|
|
4.24 |
|
|
|
9.10 |
|
|
|
246,000 |
|
|
|
9.10 |
|
13.81 15.58 |
|
|
560,000 |
|
|
|
5.95 |
|
|
|
15.07 |
|
|
|
237,000 |
|
|
|
14.36 |
|
$20.89 21.46 |
|
|
787,000 |
|
|
|
8.39 |
|
|
|
21.21 |
|
|
|
135,000 |
|
|
|
20.89 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,189,000 |
|
|
|
5.65 |
|
|
$ |
13.66 |
|
|
|
1,214,000 |
|
|
$ |
9.06 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other information pertaining to option activity during the nine month periods ended September
30, 2010 and 2009 was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2010 |
|
|
September 30, 2009 |
|
Weighted average grant-date fair value of stock options granted: |
|
$ |
2,176,000 |
|
|
$ |
1,545,000 |
|
Total fair value of stock options vested: |
|
$ |
681,000 |
|
|
$ |
447,000 |
|
Total intrinsic value of stock options exercised: |
|
$ |
3,738,000 |
|
|
$ |
1,535,000 |
|
Total pre-tax stock-based compensation expense charged against income: |
|
$ |
740,000 |
|
|
$ |
532,000 |
|
Total unrecognized compensation expense related to non-vested options: |
|
$ |
3,631,000 |
|
|
$ |
2,615,000 |
|
Under our Stock Option Plans at September 30, 2010, in addition to the 2,189,000 shares
issuable pursuant to outstanding option grants, an additional 1,409,000 shares of our Common Stock
are available for future grants. Options outstanding and exercisable were granted at stock option
prices which were not less than the fair market value of our Common Stock on the date the options
were granted and no option has a term in excess of ten years. Additionally, with the exception of
the options granted in 2010 and 2009, options became vested and exercisable either on the date of
grant or commencing nine months after the option grant date. The options granted in 2010 and 2009
become vested and exercisable ratably over a five year period on each anniversary date of the
option grant.
At September 30, 2010, the total unrecognized compensation expense related to non-vested
options, as reported above, was expected to be recognized through the fourth quarter of 2014 for
the options granted in 2010 and the fourth quarter of 2013 for the options granted in 2009. The
fair value of options granted in 2010 and 2009 was estimated on the date of grant using the
Black-Scholes valuation model with the following weighted average assumptions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Risk-free interest rate |
|
|
2.5 |
% |
|
|
2.5 |
% |
Expected volatility |
|
|
42.1 |
% |
|
|
41.0 |
% |
Weighted average expected life in years |
|
|
4.5 |
|
|
|
4.5 |
|
Dividend yield |
|
|
3.5 |
% |
|
|
3.6 |
% |
18
Employee Stock Purchase Plan
Total pre-tax share-based compensation expense charged against income for the three month and
nine month periods ended September 30, 2010 and 2009 for options granted under our Employee Stock
Purchase Plan (ESPP) was:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
ESPP compensation expense |
|
$ |
63,000 |
|
|
$ |
63,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
ESPP compensation expense |
|
$ |
207,000 |
|
|
$ |
207,000 |
|
It is estimated, at this time, that the expense attributable to such share-based payments
in the subsequent quarter of 2010 will approximate the amount
recorded in each of the first three
quarters in 2010. However, such future expense related to our ESPP will be impacted by, and be
dependent on the change in our stock price over the remaining period up to the December 31, 2010
measurement date.
Such expense was estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes valuation model with
the following weighted average assumptions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Risk-free interest rate |
|
|
0.2 |
% |
|
|
0.2 |
% |
Expected volatility |
|
|
34.0 |
% |
|
|
62.9 |
% |
Weighted average expected life in years |
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
Dividend yield |
|
|
3.5 |
% |
|
|
3.6 |
% |
We may issue new common stock or re-issue common stock from treasury to satisfy our
obligations under any of our share-based compensation plans.
Note 10 Related Party Transactions
One of our former directors, as well as the brother of an officer and a director (collectively
Related Parties), have separate ownership interests in several different client facilities which
have entered into service agreements with us. In the nine month periods ended September 30, 2010
and 2009, the service agreements with the client facilities in which the Related Parties have
ownership interests resulted in revenues of approximately $3,244,000 and $4,093,000, respectively.
At September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, accounts and notes receivable from such facilities of
$1,281,000 (net of reserves of $1,666,000) and $1,309,000 (net of reserves of $1,666,000),
respectively, are included in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.
Another of our directors is a member of a law firm which was retained by us. In each of the
nine month periods ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, fees received from us by such firm did not
exceed $100,000. Additionally, such fees did not exceed, in either three or nine month period, 5%
of such firms revenues.
19
Note 11 Income Taxes
For the nine month period ended September 30, 2010, our effective tax rate was 36.2%, which
was a decrease from the 38.5% effective tax rate for the comparable 2009 period. Such differences
between the effective tax rates and the applicable U.S. federal statutory rate primarily arise from
the effect of state and local income taxes and tax credits available to the Company. The decrease
in the effective tax rate was primarily the result of tax credits realized upon the filing, in the
2010 third quarter, of the 2009 income tax return compared to estimated tax credits for previous
fiscal periods. Additionally, there was a slight decrease in the effective tax rate resulting from
changes in the apportionment of our income among the states within which we do business that have
positively impacted our combined state income taxes.
We account for income taxes using the asset and liability method, which results in recognizing
income tax expense based on the amount of income taxes payable or refundable for the current year.
Additionally, we evaluate regularly the tax positions taken or expected to be taken resulting from
financial statement recognition of certain items. Based on our evaluation, we have concluded that
there are no significant uncertain tax positions requiring recognition in our financial statements.
Our evaluation was performed for the tax years ended December 31, 2006 through 2009 (with regard to
U.S. federal income tax returns) and December 31, 2005 through 2009 (with regard to various state
and local income tax returns), the tax years which remain subject to examination by major tax
jurisdictions as of September 30, 2010.
We may from time to time be assessed interest or penalties by major tax jurisdictions,
although any such assessments historically have been minimal and immaterial to our financial
results. When we have received an assessment for interest and/or penalties, it has been classified
in the financial statements as selling, general and administrative expense.
Note 12 Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements
In February 2010, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (the FASB) issued amended
guidance on subsequent events. Under this amended guidance, SEC filers are no longer required to
disclose the date through which subsequent events have been evaluated in originally issued and
revised financial statements. This guidance was effective immediately and the Company adopted
these new requirements upon issuance of this guidance.
In January 2010, the FASB issued updated standards related to additional requirements and
guidance regarding disclosures of fair value measurements. The guidance require the gross
presentation of activity within the Level 3 fair value measurement roll forward and details of
transfers in and out of Level 1 and 2 fair value measurements. In addition, companies will be
required to disclose quantitative information about the inputs used in determining fair values.
These standards were adopted in the first quarter of 2010. The adoption of these standards had no
impact on the Companys financial position or results of operations as it only amends required
disclosures.
In September 2009, the FASB issued updated standards that address the determination of when
the individual deliverables included in a multiple arrangement may be treated as separate units of
accounting. This guidance also modifies the manner in which the transaction consideration is
allocated across separately identified deliverables and establishes definitions for determining
fair value of elements in an arrangement. This standard must be adopted by us no later than January
1, 2011 with earlier adoption permitted. We are currently evaluating the impact, if any, that this
standard update will have on our consolidated financial statements.
Note 13 Subsequent Event
We evaluated all subsequent events through the date these financial statements are being filed
with the SEC. There were no events or transactions occurring during this subsequent event reporting
period which require recognition or disclosure in the financial statements.
20
ITEM 2 MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward Looking Statements
This report and documents incorporated by reference into this report contain forward-looking
statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and
Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the Exchange Act), as amended, which are not
historical facts but rather are based on current expectations, estimates and projections about our
business and industry, our beliefs and assumptions. Words such as believes, anticipates,
plans, expects, will, goal, and similar expressions are intended to identify
forward-looking statements. The inclusion of forward-looking statements should not be regarded as a
representation by us that any of our plans will be achieved. We undertake no obligation to publicly
update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future
events or otherwise. Such forward looking information is also subject to various risks and
uncertainties. Such risks and uncertainties include, but are not limited to, risks arising from our
providing services exclusively to the health care industry, primarily providers of long-term care;
proposed legislation and/or regulations to reform the U.S. healthcare system in an effort to
contain healthcare costs; credit and collection risks associated with this industry; one client
accounting for approximately 11.0% of revenues in the nine month period ended September 30, 2010 -
(see note 6, Major Client in the accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements); risks
associated with our acquisition of Contract Environmental Services, Inc., including integration
risks and costs, or such business not achieving expected financial results or synergies or failure
to otherwise perform as expected; our claims experience related to workers compensation and
general liability insurance; the effects of changes in, or interpretations of laws and regulations
governing the industry, including state and local regulations pertaining to the taxability of our
services; and the risk factors described in Part I in this report under Government Regulation of
Clients, Competition, Service Agreements/Collections, and under Item IA, Risk Factors. Many
of our clients revenues are highly contingent on Medicare and Medicaid reimbursement funding
rates, which Congress has affected through the enactment of a number of major laws during the past
decade, most recently the March 2010 enactment of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act
and the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010 (together, the Act). Currently, the
U.S. Congress is considering further changes or revising legislation relating to health care in the
United States which, among other initiatives, may impose cost containment measures impacting our
clients. These laws and proposed laws have significantly altered, or threaten to alter, overall
government reimbursement funding rates and mechanisms. In addition, the current economic crises
could adversely affect such funding. The overall effect of these laws and trends in the long-term
care industry has affected and could adversely affect the liquidity of our clients, resulting in
their inability to make payments to us on agreed upon payment terms. These factors, in addition to
delays in payments from clients, have resulted in, and could continue to result in, significant
additional bad debts in the near future. Additionally, our operating results would be adversely
affected if unexpected increases in the costs of labor and labor related costs, materials, supplies
and equipment used in performing services could not be passed on to our clients.
In addition, we believe that to improve our financial performance we must continue to obtain
service agreements with new clients, provide new services to existing clients, achieve modest price
increases on current service agreements with existing clients and maintain internal cost reduction
strategies at our various operational levels. Furthermore, we believe that our ability to sustain
the internal development of managerial personnel is an important factor impacting future operating
results and successfully executing projected growth strategies.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The following discussion is intended to provide the reader with information that will be
helpful in understanding our financial statements, including the changes in certain key items in
comparing financial statements period to period. We also intend to provide the primary factors that
accounted for those changes, as well as a summary of how certain accounting principles affect our
financial statements. In addition, we are providing information about the financial results of our
two operating segments to further assist in understanding how these segments and their results
affect our consolidated results of operations. This discussion should be read in conjunction with
our financial statements as of September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009 and the periods then ended
and the notes accompanying those financial statements.
Overview
We provide management, administrative, and operating expertise to the housekeeping, laundry,
linen, facility maintenance and dietary service departments to the health care industry, including
nursing homes, retirement complexes, rehabilitation centers and hospitals located throughout the
United States.
21
We believe that we are the largest provider of housekeeping and laundry services to the
long-term care industry in the United States, rendering such services to approximately 2,450
facilities in 47 states as of September 30, 2010. Although we do not directly participate in any
government reimbursement programs, our clients reimbursements are subject to government
regulation. Therefore, they are directly affected by any legislation relating to Medicare and
Medicaid reimbursement programs.
We provide our services primarily pursuant to full service agreements with our clients. In
such agreements, we are responsible for the management and hourly employees located at our clients
facilities. We also provide services on the basis of a management-only agreement for a very limited
number of clients. Additionally, we also provide, individually or as a combination thereof, the
specialized services of Dietary (dietary department management, food preparation services,
consulting services and food purchasing) on a stand-alone basis to certain clients. Our agreements
with clients typically provide for a one year service term, cancelable by either party upon 30 to
90 days notice after the initial 120-day period.
We are organized into two reportable segments: housekeeping, laundry, linen and facility
maintenance (Housekeeping), and dietary department services (Dietary). Housekeeping is
being provided at all of our approximately 2,450 client facilities, generating approximately 77% or
$441,783,000 of the nine month period ending September 30, 2010 total revenues. Dietary is being
provided to approximately 350 client facilities and contributed approximately 23% or $130,085,000
to the nine month period ending September 30, 2010 total revenues.
Housekeeping consists primarily of the cleaning, disinfecting and sanitizing of patient rooms
and common areas of a clients facility, as well as the laundering and processing of the personal
clothing belonging to the facilitys patients. Also within the scope of this segments service is
the laundering and processing of the bed linens, uniforms and other assorted linen items utilized
by a client facility.
Dietary consists of food purchasing, meal preparation and providing dietician consulting
professional services, which includes the development of a menu that meets the patients dietary
needs.
We currently operate one wholly-owned subsidiary, Huntingdon Holdings, Inc. (Huntingdon).
Huntingdon invests our cash and cash equivalents and manages our portfolio of available-for-sale
marketable securities.
On May 1, 2009, we acquired essentially all of the assets of Contract Environmental Services,
Inc. (CES), a South Carolina based corporation which is a provider of professional housekeeping,
laundry and dietary department services to long-term care and related facilities. We believe the
acquisition of CES expands and complements our position of being the largest provider of such
services to long-term care and related facilities in the United States. The aggregate consideration
was approximately $13,825,000 consisting of: (i) $4,613,000 in cash, (ii) a issuance of
approximately 66,000 shares of our common stock (valued at approximately $1,183,000) future
issuance of approximately 265,000 shares (valued at approximately $3,311,000) contingent upon the
achievement of certain financial targets, and (iii) the repayment of approximately $4,718,000 of
certain debt obligations of CES. The final allocation of such consideration resulted in our
recording of the following: (i) approximately $8,998,000 of tangible assets consisting primarily of
accounts receivable, (ii) $5,700,000 of amortizable intangible assets, (iii) $1,936,000 of goodwill
and (iv) current liabilities of approximately $2,809,000. The CES results of operations are not
included in our consolidated results of operations before May 1, 2009, which was prior to the
closing of the transaction. Effective January 1, 2010, all of CES operations were fully
integrated with our operations.
22
Consolidated Operations
The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, the percentage which certain items
bear to consolidated revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Relation to Consolidated Revenues |
|
|
|
For the Three Months Ended September 30, |
|
|
For the Nine Month Period Ended September 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Revenues |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
Operating costs and expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs of services provided |
|
|
86.3 |
% |
|
|
86.8 |
% |
|
|
86.1 |
% |
|
|
86.0 |
% |
Selling, general and
administrative |
|
|
7.4 |
% |
|
|
6.7 |
% |
|
|
7.3 |
% |
|
|
7.1 |
% |
Investment and interest |
|
|
0.6 |
% |
|
|
1.0 |
% |
|
|
0.3 |
% |
|
|
0.7 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes |
|
|
6.9 |
% |
|
|
7.5 |
% |
|
|
6.9 |
% |
|
|
7.6 |
% |
Income taxes |
|
|
2.2 |
% |
|
|
2.9 |
% |
|
|
2.5 |
% |
|
|
2.9 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
4.7 |
% |
|
|
4.6 |
% |
|
|
4.4 |
% |
|
|
4.7 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subject to the factors noted in the Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward Looking Statements
included in this report, we anticipate our financial performance for the remainder of 2010 will
likely be comparable to the percentages presented in the above table as they relate to consolidated
revenues.
Housekeeping is our largest and core reportable segment, representing approximately 78% of
consolidated revenues for the three months ended September 30, 2010 and approximately 77% for the
nine month period ended September 30, 2010. Dietary revenues represented approximately 22% of
consolidated revenues for the three months ended September 30, 2010 and approximately 23% for the
nine month period ended September 30, 2010.
Although there can be no assurance thereof, we believe that for the remainder of 2010 each of
Housekeepings and Dietarys revenues, as a percentage of consolidated revenues, will remain
approximately the same as their respective percentages noted above. Furthermore, we expect the
sources of organic growth for the remainder of 2010 for the respective operating segments will be
primarily the same as historically experienced. Accordingly, although there can be no assurance
thereof, the growth in Dietary is expected to come from our current Housekeeping client base,
while growth in Housekeeping will primarily come from obtaining new clients.
Three Months ended September 30, 2010 Compared with Three Months ended September 30, 2009
The following table sets forth income statement key components for the three months period
ended September 30, 2010 that we use to evaluate our financial performance on a consolidated and
reportable segment basis, as well as the percentage increases/(decreases) of each key component as
compared to the 2009 period. The difference between the reportable segments operating results and
other disclosed data and our consolidated financial statements relate primarily to corporate level
transactions and recording of transactions at the reportable segment level which use methods other
than generally accepted accounting principles. There was no impact to the consolidated operating
results from the CES acquisition in the comparisons of the three month period, as CES operations
were reflected in each three month period ended September 30, 2010 and 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reportable Segments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% inc./ |
|
|
Corporate and |
|
|
Housekeeping |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dietary |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated |
|
|
(dec.) |
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
% inc. |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
% inc. |
|
Revenues |
|
$ |
195,114,000 |
|
|
|
9.1 |
% |
|
$ |
78,000 |
|
|
$ |
151,265,000 |
|
|
|
10.8 |
% |
|
$ |
43,771,000 |
|
|
|
3.4 |
% |
Cost of services provided |
|
|
168,384,000 |
|
|
|
8.5 |
|
|
|
(11,054,000 |
) |
|
|
137,225,000 |
|
|
|
11.0 |
|
|
|
42,213,000 |
|
|
|
3.2 |
|
Selling, general and
administrative |
|
|
14,488,000 |
|
|
|
21.4 |
|
|
|
14,488,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment and interest income |
|
|
1,182,000 |
|
|
|
(30.8 |
) |
|
|
1,182,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes |
|
$ |
13,424,000 |
|
|
|
.4 |
% |
|
$ |
(2,174,000 |
) |
|
$ |
14,040,000 |
|
|
|
8.8 |
% |
|
$ |
1,558,000 |
|
|
|
8.9 |
% |
23
Revenues
Consolidated
Consolidated revenues increased 9.1% to $195,114,000 for the three months ended September 30,
2010 compared to $178,829,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2009 as a result of the
factors discussed below under Reportable Segments.
Our Major Client accounted for 11.0% and 12.0%, respectively of consolidated revenues in the
three month periods ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively. The loss of such client would
have a material adverse effect on the results of operations of our two operating segments. In
addition, if such client changes its payment terms it would increase our accounts receivable
balance and have a material adverse effect on our cash flows and cash and cash equivalents.
Reportable Segments
Housekeepings 10.8% net growth in reportable segment revenues resulted primarily from an
increase in revenues attributable to service agreements entered into with new clients.
Dietarys 3.4% net growth in reportable segment revenues is due to an increase in providing
this service to existing Housekeeping clients.
We derived 11.0% and 9.0%, respectively, of Housekeeping and Dietarys revenues for the three
months ended September 30, 2010 from our Major Client.
Costs of services provided
Consolidated
Cost of services provided, on a consolidated basis, as a percentage of consolidated revenues
for the three months ended September 30, 2010 decreased to 86.3% from 86.8% in the corresponding
period in 2009. The following table provides a comparison of the primary cost of services
provided-key indicators that we manage on a consolidated basis in evaluating our financial
performance. In addition, see the discussion below on Reportable Segments which provides additional
details to explain the 0.5% decrease in consolidated cost of services provided.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of Services Provided-Key Indicators |
|
2010 % |
|
|
2009 % |
|
|
Inc/(Decr)% |
|
Bad debt provision |
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
(0.0 |
) |
Workers compensation and general
liability insurance |
|
|
4.6 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
The bad debt provision as a percentage of consolidated revenues is consistent for the three
month period ended June 30, 2010 and 2009.
The workers compensation and general liability insurance expense increase is primarily a
result of unfavorable claims experience during the three months ended September 30, 2010 compared
to the prior period.
Reportable Segments
Cost of services provided for Housekeeping, as a percentage of Housekeeping revenues, for the
three months ended September 30, 2010 increased slightly to 90.7% from 90.5% in the corresponding
2009 period. Cost of services provided for Dietary, as a percentage of Dietary revenues, for the
three months ended September 30, 2010 decreased to 96.4% from 96.6% in the corresponding 2009
period.
24
The following table provides a comparison of the primary cost of services provided-key
indicators, as a percentage of the respective segments revenues, which we manage on a reportable
segment basis in evaluating our financial performance:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of Services Provided-Key Indicators |
|
2010 % |
|
|
2009 % |
|
|
Incr (Decr)% |
|
Housekeeping labor and other labor
costs |
|
|
81.1 |
|
|
|
81.4 |
|
|
|
(0.3 |
) |
Housekeeping supplies |
|
|
7.0 |
|
|
|
6.8 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
Dietary labor and other labor costs |
|
|
53.8 |
|
|
|
53.3 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
Dietary supplies |
|
|
39.6 |
|
|
|
40.8 |
|
|
|
(1.2 |
) |
The decrease in Housekeeping labor and other labor costs, as a percentage of Housekeeping
revenues, resulted primarily from efficiencies recognized in managing labor at the facility level.
The increase in Housekeeping supplies, as a percentage of Housekeeping revenues, resulted primarily
from an increase in linen supplies due to the growth in laundry and linen revenue compared to
overall housekeeping revenues.
The increase in Dietary labor and other labor costs, as a percentage of Dietary revenues,
resulted from inefficiencies in managing these costs at the facility level. The decrease in Dietary
supplies, as a percentage of Dietary revenues, is a result of increased efficiencies in managing
these costs along with more favorable vendor prices obtained through further consolidation of
dietary supply vendors.
Consolidated Selling, General and Administrative Expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2010 |
|
|
September 30, 2009 |
|
|
% Growth |
|
Selling, general and
administrative expense w/o
deferred
compensation change |
|
|
(a |
) |
|
$ |
13,642,000 |
|
|
$ |
11,003,000 |
|
|
|
24.0 |
% |
Gain deferred compensation fund |
|
|
|
|
|
|
846,000 |
|
|
|
933,000 |
|
|
|
(9.3 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated selling, general
and administrative expense |
|
|
(b |
) |
|
$ |
14,488,000 |
|
|
$ |
11,936,000 |
|
|
|
21.4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Selling, general and administrative expense excluding the gain of the deferred
compensation fund. |
|
(b) |
|
Consolidated selling, general and administrative expense reported for the period
presented. |
Although our growth in consolidated revenues was 9.1%, selling, general and administrative
expenses excluding gain of deferred compensation fund for the three months ended September 30, 2010
increased 24.0% or $2,639,000 compared to the corresponding 2009 period. Consequently, the selling,
general and administrative expenses for the three months ended September 30, 2010 (excluding impact
of deferred compensation fund), as a percentage of consolidated revenues, increased to 7.0% as
compared to 6.2% in the 2009 third quarter. This percentage increase resulted primarily from a
larger increase in payroll and payroll related costs as compared to the increase in our revenues.
Consolidated Investment and Interest Income
Investment and interest income, as a percentage of consolidated revenues, decreased to 0.6%
for the three months ended September 30, 2010 compared to 1.0% in the corresponding three months
ended September 30, 2009. Consolidated investment and interest income was primarily impacted by
the decrease in interest earned on our marketable securities.
Income before Income Taxes
Consolidated
As a result of the discussion above related to revenues and expenses, consolidated income
before income taxes for the three months ended September 30, 2010 decreased to 6.9%, as a
percentage of consolidated revenues, compared to 7.5% in the corresponding 2009 period.
25
Reportable Segments
Housekeepings 8.8% increase in income before income taxes is primarily attributable to the
gross profit earned on the 10.8% increase in reportable segment revenues. The income before income
taxes was negatively impacted by the increase in payroll and payroll related costs and supply costs
for the period.
Dietarys income before income taxes increase of 8.9% on a reportable segment basis primarily
attributable to the gross profit earned on the 3.4% increase in reportable segment revenues and the
reduction in overall food supplies as a percentage of Dietary revenue.
Consolidated Income Taxes
Our effective tax rate for the three months ended September 30, 2010 was 31.7% and 38.5% in
the corresponding period in 2009. The decrease in the effective tax rate was primarily the result
of tax credits realized upon the filing, in the 2010 third quarter, of the 2009 income tax return
compared to estimated tax credits for previous fiscal periods. Additionally, there was a slight
decrease in the effective tax rate resulting from changes in the apportionment of our income among
the states within which we do business that have positively impacted our combined state income
taxes.
Absent any significant change in federal, or state and local tax laws, we expect our effective
tax rate for the remainder of 2010 to approximate 36.7%. Our effective tax rate differs from the
federal income tax statutory rate principally because of the effect of state and local income
taxes. The estimated effective tax rate for the remainder of 2010 is expected to increase from the
three months ended September 30, 2010 due to the positive impact of prior year credits realized
during this period as a result of the filing of the 2009 income tax return.
Consolidated Net Income
As a result of the matters discussed above, consolidated net income increased slightly to 4.7%
of consolidated revenue for the three months ended September 30, 2010 compared to 4.6% of
consolidated revenues for the corresponding period in 2009.
2010 Nine Months ended September 30, 2010 Compared to 2009 Nine Months ended September 30, 2009
The following table sets forth for the nine month period ended September 30, 2010 income
statement key components that we use to evaluate our financial performance on a consolidated and
reportable segment basis, as well as the percentage changes of each compared to the nine month
period ended September 30, 2009 amounts.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reportable Segments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% inc./ |
|
|
Corporate and |
|
|
Housekeeping |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dietary |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated |
|
|
(dec.) |
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
% inc. |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
% inc. |
|
Revenues |
|
$ |
571,868,000 |
|
|
|
12.1 |
% |
|
$ |
43,000 |
|
|
$ |
441,680,000 |
|
|
|
12.3 |
% |
|
$ |
130,145,000 |
|
|
|
11.6 |
% |
Cost of services provided |
|
|
492,196,000 |
|
|
|
12.1 |
|
|
|
(30,372,000 |
) |
|
|
398,290,000 |
|
|
|
12.2 |
|
|
|
124,278,000 |
|
|
|
11.6 |
|
Selling, general and
administrative |
|
|
41,539,000 |
|
|
|
14.3 |
|
|
|
41,539,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment and interest income |
|
|
1,549,000 |
|
|
|
(59.3 |
) |
|
|
1,549,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes |
|
$ |
39,682,000 |
|
|
|
2.6 |
% |
|
$ |
(9,575,000 |
) |
|
$ |
43,390,000 |
|
|
|
12.6 |
% |
|
$ |
5,867,000 |
|
|
|
13.0 |
% |
Revenues
Consolidated
Consolidated revenues increased 12.1% to $571,868,000 in the nine month period ended September
30, 2010 compared to $510,134,000 in the same 2009 period as a result of the factors discussed
below under Reportable Segments.
Our Major Client accounted for 11.0% and 13.0%, respectively, of consolidated revenues in the
nine month periods ended, September 30, 2010 and 2009.
26
Reportable Segments
Housekeepings 12.3% net growth in reportable segment revenues resulted primarily from an
increase in revenues, attributable to service agreements entered into with new clients. CES
accounted for approximately 1.0% of the nine month periods net growth in reportable segment
revenues.
Dietarys 11.6% net growth in reportable segment revenues is primarily a result of providing
this service to existing Housekeeping clients. CES accounted for 5.7% of the nine month periods
net growth in reportable segment revenues.
We derived 11.0% and 9.0%, respectively, of Housekeeping and Dietarys 2010 nine month period
revenues from the Major Client.
Costs of services provided
Consolidated
Cost of services provided, on a consolidated basis, as a percentage of consolidated revenues
for the nine month period ended September 30, 2010 increased slightly to 86.1% from 86.0% in the
corresponding 2009 period. The following table provides a comparison of the primary cost of
services provided-key indicators that we manage on a consolidated basis in evaluating our financial
performance. In addition, see the discussion below on Reportable Segments which provides additional
details to explain the .1% increase in consolidated costs of services provided.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of Services Provided-Key Indicators |
|
2010 % |
|
|
2009 % |
|
|
Inc/(Decr)% |
|
Bad debt provision |
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
Workers compensation and general
liability insurance |
|
|
3.9 |
|
|
|
3.9 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
The slight decrease in bad debt provision is primarily a result of less expense recorded
related to certain nursing homes filing for bankruptcy.
The workers compensation and general liability insurance expense is consistent as a
percentage of consolidate revenue for the nine month periods ended September 30, 2010 and 2009.
Reportable Segments
Cost of services provided for Housekeeping, as a percentage of Housekeeping revenues, for the
nine month periods ended September 30, 2010 and 2009 were consistent at 90.2%. Cost of services
provided for Dietary, as a percentage of Dietary revenues, for the nine month periods ended
September 30, 2010 and 2009 were consistent at 95.5%
The following table provides a comparison of the primary cost of services provided-key
indicators, as a percentage of the respective segments revenues, which we manage on a reportable
segment basis in evaluating our financial performance:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of Services Provided-Key Indicators |
|
2010 % |
|
|
2009 % |
|
|
Inc/(Decr)% |
|
Housekeeping labor and other labor
costs |
|
|
80.7 |
|
|
|
81.3 |
|
|
|
(0.6 |
) |
Housekeeping supplies |
|
|
6.8 |
|
|
|
6.3 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
Dietary labor and other labor costs |
|
|
53.3 |
|
|
|
52.5 |
|
|
|
0.8 |
|
Dietary supplies |
|
|
39.3 |
|
|
|
39.9 |
|
|
|
(0.6 |
) |
The decrease in Housekeeping labor and other labor costs, as a percentage of Housekeeping
revenues, resulted primarily from efficiencies recognized in managing labor at the facility level.
The increase in Housekeeping supplies, as a percentage of Housekeeping revenues, resulted primarily
from an increase in linen supplies due to the growth in laundry and linen revenue.
The increase in Dietary labor and other labor costs, as a percentage of Dietary revenues,
resulted from inefficiencies in managing these costs at the facility level. The decrease in Dietary
supplies, as a percentage of Dietary revenues, is a result of improved management of these costs
and more favorable vendor prices obtained through further consolidation of dietary supply vendors.
27
Consolidated Selling, General and Administrative Expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine month period ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2010 |
|
|
September 30, 2009 |
|
|
% Growth |
|
Selling, general and
administrative expense w/o
deferred
compensation change |
|
|
(a |
) |
|
$ |
41,063,000 |
|
|
$ |
34,874,000 |
|
|
|
17.7 |
% |
Gain deferred compensation fund |
|
|
|
|
|
|
476,000 |
|
|
|
1,454,000 |
|
|
|
(67.3 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated selling, general
and administrative expense |
|
|
(b |
) |
|
$ |
41,539,000 |
|
|
$ |
36,328,000 |
|
|
|
14.3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Selling, general and administrative expense excluding the gain of the deferred
compensation fund. |
|
(b) |
|
Consolidated selling, general and administrative expense reported for the period
presented. |
Although our growth in consolidated revenues was 12.1% for the nine month period ended
September 30, 2010, selling, general and administrative expenses excluding gain of deferred
compensation fund increased 17.7% or $6,189,000 compared to the 2009 comparable period.
Consequently for the nine month period ended September 30, 2010, selling, general and
administrative expenses (excluding impact of deferred compensation fund), as a percentage of
consolidated revenues, increased to 7.2% of consolidated revenues as compared to 6.8% in the 2009
comparable period. This percentage increase resulted primarily from an increase in our payroll and
payroll related expenses.
Consolidated Investment and Interest Income
Investment and interest income, as a percentage of consolidated revenues, decreased to 0.3%
for the nine month period ended September 30, 2010 compared to 0.7% for the comparable period in
2009. Consolidated investment and interest income for the nine month period ended September 30,
2010 was attributable to a decrease in the market value of the investments held in our Deferred
Compensation Fund and a decrease in interest earned, and realized and unrealized net gains on our
marketable securities portfolio during this period.
Income before Income Taxes
Consolidated
As a result of the discussion above related to revenues and expenses, consolidated income
before income taxes for the nine month period September 30, 2010 decreased to 6.9%, as a percentage
of consolidated revenues, compared to 7.6% for the nine month period ended September 30, 2009.
Reportable Segments
Housekeepings 12.6% increase in income before income taxes is primarily attributable to the
gross profit earned on the 12.3% increase in reportable segment revenues.
Dietarys income before income taxes increase of 11.6% on a reportable segment basis is
primarily attributable to the gross profit earned on the 13.0% increase in reportable segment
revenues.
Consolidated Income Taxes
Our effective tax rate was 36.2% for the nine month period ended September 30, 2010 and 38.5%
for the corresponding period in 2009. The decrease in the effective tax rate was primarily the
result of tax credits realized upon the filing, in the 2010 third quarter, of the 2009 income tax
return compared to estimated tax credits for previous fiscal periods. Additionally, there was a
slight decrease in the effective tax rate resulting from changes in the apportionment of our income
among the states within which we do business that have positively impacted our combined state
income taxes.
Absent any significant change in federal, or state and local tax laws, we expect our effective
tax rate for the remainder of 2010 to approximate 36.7%. Our effective tax rate differs from the
federal income tax statutory rate principally because of the effect of state and local income
taxes. The estimated effective tax rate for the remainder of 2010 is expected to increase from the
three months ended September 30, 2010 due to the positive impact of prior year credits realized
during this period as a result of the filing of
the 2009 income tax return.
28
Consolidated Net Income
As a result of the matters discussed above, consolidated net income for the nine month period
ended September 30, 2010 decreased to 4.4%, as a percentage of consolidated revenues, compared to
4.7% in the 2009 comparable period.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in accordance with accounting standards generally
accepted in the United States requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the
reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported
amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period.
We consider the three policies discussed below to be critical to an understanding of our
financial statements because their application places the most significant demands on our judgment.
Therefore, it should be noted that financial reporting results rely on estimating the effect of
matters that are inherently uncertain. Specific risks for these critical accounting policies and
estimates are described in the following paragraphs. For these estimates, we caution that future
events rarely develop exactly as forecasted, and the best estimates routinely require adjustment.
Any such adjustments or revisions to estimates could result in material differences to previously
reported amounts.
The three policies discussed are not intended to be a comprehensive list of all of our
accounting policies. In many cases, the accounting treatment of a particular transaction is
specifically dictated by accounting standards generally accepted in the United States, with no need
for our judgment in their application. There are also areas in which our judgment in selecting
another available alternative would not produce a materially different result. See our audited
consolidated financial statements and notes thereto which are included in our Annual Report on Form
10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009, which contain accounting policies and estimates and
other disclosures required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States.
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts
The Allowance for Doubtful Accounts (the Allowance) is established as losses are estimated
to have occurred through a provision for bad debts charged to earnings. The Allowance is evaluated
based on our periodic review of accounts and notes receivable and is inherently subjective as it
requires estimates that are susceptible to significant revision as more information becomes
available.
We have had varying collection experience with respect to our accounts and notes receivable.
When contractual terms are not met, we generally encounter difficulty in collecting amounts due
from certain of our clients. Therefore, we have sometimes been required to extend the period of
payment for certain clients beyond contractual terms. These clients include those who have
terminated service agreements and slow payers experiencing financial difficulties. In making credit
evaluations, in addition to analyzing and anticipating, where possible, the specific cases
described above, we consider the general collection risks associated with trends in the long-term
care industry. We also establish credit limits, perform ongoing credit evaluations, and monitor
accounts to minimize the risk of loss.
In accordance with the risk of extending credit, we regularly evaluate our accounts and notes
receivable for impairment or loss of value and when appropriate, will provide in our Allowance for
such receivables. We generally follow a policy of reserving for receivables due from clients in
bankruptcy, clients with which we are in litigation for collection and other slow paying clients.
The reserve is based upon our estimates of ultimate collectability. Correspondingly, once our
recovery of a receivable is typically determined through litigation, bankruptcy proceedings or
negotiation to be less than the recorded amount on our balance sheet, we will charge-off the
applicable amount to the Allowance.
Our methodology for the Allowance is based upon a risk-based evaluation of accounts and notes
receivable associated with a clients ability to make payments. Such Allowance generally consists
of an initial amount established based upon criteria generally applied if and when a client account
files bankruptcy, is placed for collection/litigation and/or is considered to be pending
collection/litigation. The initial Allowance is adjusted either higher or lower when additional
information is available to permit a more accurate estimate of the collectability of an account.
29
Summarized below for the nine month period ended September 30, 2010 and year ended December
31, 2009 are the aggregate account balances for the three Allowance criteria noted above, net
write-offs of client accounts, bad debt provision and allowance for doubtful accounts.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aggregate Account |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
of Balances of Clients |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
in Bankruptcy or in/or |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for |
|
|
|
Pending Collection/ |
|
|
Net Write-offs of |
|
|
Bad Debt |
|
|
Doubtful |
|
Period Ended |
|
Litigation |
|
|
Client Accounts |
|
|
Provision |
|
|
Accounts |
|
September 30, 2010 |
|
$ |
10,252,000 |
|
|
$ |
707,000 |
|
|
$ |
1,550,000 |
|
|
$ |
5,483,000 |
|
December 31, 2009 |
|
|
9,874,000 |
|
|
|
978,000 |
|
|
|
2,404,000 |
|
|
|
4,640,000 |
|
At September 30, 2010, we identified accounts totaling $10,252,000 that require an Allowance
based on potential impairment or loss of value. An Allowance totaling $5,483,000 was provided for
these accounts at such date. Actual collections of these accounts could differ from that which we
currently estimate. If our actual collection experience is 5% less than our estimate, the related
increase to our Allowance would decrease net income by $153,000.
Notwithstanding our efforts to minimize credit risk exposure, our clients could be adversely
affected if future industry trends, as more fully discussed under Liquidity and Capital Resources
below, and as further described in our 2009 Annual Report on Form 10-K in Part I under Risk
Factors, Government Regulation of Clients and Service Agreements/Collections, change in
such a manner as to negatively impact the cash flows of our clients. If our clients experience a
negative impact in their cash flows, it would have a material adverse effect on our results of
operations and financial condition.
Accrued Insurance Claims
We currently have a Paid Loss Retrospective Insurance Plan for general liability and workers
compensation insurance, which comprises approximately 39.3% of our liabilities at September 30,
2010. Our accounting for this plan is affected by various uncertainties because we must make
assumptions and apply judgment to estimate the ultimate cost to settle reported claims and claims
incurred but not reported as of the balance sheet date. We address these uncertainties by regularly
evaluating our claims pay-out experience, present value factor and other factors related to the
nature of specific claims in arriving at the basis for our accrued insurance claims estimate. Our
evaluations are based primarily on current information derived from reviewing our claims experience
and industry trends. In the event that our claims experience and/ or industry trends result in an
unfavorable change, it would have a material adverse effect on our consolidated results of
operations and financial condition. Under these plans, predetermined loss limits are arranged with
an insurance company to limit both our per-occurrence cash outlay and annual insurance plan cost.
For workers compensation, we record a reserve based on the present value of future payments,
including an estimate of claims incurred but not reported, that are developed as a result of a
review of our historical data and open claims. The present value of the payout is determined by
applying an 8% discount factor against the estimated value of the claims over the estimated
remaining pay-out period. Reducing the discount factor by 1% would reduce net income by
approximately $40,000. Additionally, reducing the estimated payout period by nine months would
result in an approximate $100,000 reduction in net income.
For general liability, we record a reserve for the estimated ultimate amounts to be paid for
known claims. The estimated ultimate reserve amount recorded is derived from the estimated claim
reserves provided by our insurance carrier reduced by an historical experience factor.
Asset Valuations and Review for Potential Impairment
We review our fixed assets, goodwill and other intangible assets at least annually or whenever
events or changes in circumstances indicate that its carrying amount may not be recoverable. This
review requires that we make assumptions regarding the value of these assets and the changes in
circumstances that would affect the carrying value of these assets. If such analysis indicates that
a possible impairment may exist, we are then required to estimate the fair value of the asset and,
as deemed appropriate, expense all or a portion of the asset. The determination of fair value
includes numerous uncertainties, such as the impact of competition on future value. We believe that
we have made reasonable estimates and judgments in determining whether our long-term assets have
been impaired; however, if there is a material change in the assumptions used in our determination
of fair value or if there is a material change in economic conditions or circumstances influencing
fair value, we could be required to recognize certain impairment charges in the future. As a result
of our most recent reviews, no changes in asset values were required.
30
Liquidity and Capital Resources
At September 30, 2010, we had cash and cash equivalents and marketable securities of
$70,607,000 and working capital of $179,102,000 compared to December 31, 2009 cash and cash
equivalents and marketable securities of $83,949,000 and working capital of $177,453,000. We view
our cash and cash equivalents and marketable securities as our principal measure of liquidity. Our
current ratio at September 30, 2010 increased to 8.4 to 1 compared to 6.1 to 1 at December 31,
2009. This increase resulted from the increase in accounts and notes receivables resulting from our
12.1% increase in revenues during the nine months period ended September 30, 2010 and the timing
of payments for accounts payable, accrued payroll, accrued and withheld payroll taxes, which was
offset by the decrease in cash and cash equivalents and marketable securities. On an historical
basis, our operations have generally produced consistent cash flow and have required limited
capital resources. We believe our current and near term cash flow positions will enable us to fund
our anticipated growth.
Operating Activities
The net cash provided by our operating activities was $15,676,000 for the nine month period
ended September 30, 2010. The principal sources of net cash flows from operating activities for the
nine month period ended September 30, 2010 were net income, and non-cash charges to operations for
bad debt provisions, depreciation and amortization. Additionally, operating activities cash flows
increased by $8,004,000 as a result of the increase in accrued insurance claims, deferred
compensation liability and income taxes payable and the decrease in prepaid expenses for the nine
month period. The operating activity that used the largest amount of cash during the nine month
period ended September 30, 2010 was a net increase of $9,856,000 in accounts and notes receivable,
long-term notes receivable and inventory resulting primarily from the 12.1% growth in the Companys
revenues for the nine month period ended September 30, 2010. Cash flow from operating activity was
also positively impacted by a decrease of accounts payable and other accrued expenses of $2,259,000
due to timing of certain payments.
Investing Activities
Our principal source of cash in investing activities for the nine month period ended September
30, 2010 was $6,829,000 for the net sales and maturities of marketable securities. The net sales
and maturities of marketable securities enabled us to increase cash and equivalents to support the
current and expected increase in client facilities. Additionally, we expended $2,537,000 for the
purchase of housekeeping equipment, computer software and equipment, and laundry equipment
installations. Under our current plans, which are subject to revision upon further review, it is
our intention to spend an aggregate of $500,000 to $1,500,000 during the remainder of 2010 for such
capital expenditures.
Financing Activities
During the nine month period ended September 30, 2010, we paid regular quarterly cash
dividends totaling $29,025,000 as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months ended |
|
|
|
March 31, 2010 |
|
|
June 30, 2010 |
|
|
September 30, 2010 |
|
Cash dividend per common
share |
|
$ |
.21 |
|
|
$ |
.22 |
|
|
$ |
.23 |
|
Total cash dividends paid |
|
$ |
9,224,000 |
|
|
$ |
9,677,000 |
|
|
$ |
10,124,000 |
|
Record date |
|
February 12 |
|
|
April 23 |
|
|
July 23 |
|
Payment date |
|
March 5 |
|
|
May 14 |
|
|
August 6 |
|
On October 12, 2010, our Board of Directors declared a regular quarterly cash dividend of
$.2325 per common share to be paid on November 5, 2010 to shareholders of record as of October 22,
2010. Additionally, our Board of Directors has declared a three-for-two stock split in the form of
a 50% stock dividend payable on November 12, 2010 to shareholders of record of its Common Stock at
the close of business November 8, 2010. All fractional share interests will be rounded up to the
nearest whole number. The effect of this action will be to increase Common Shares outstanding by
approximately 22,000,000 shares.
31
Our Board of Directors reviews our dividend policy on a quarterly basis. Although there can be
no assurance that we will continue to pay dividends or the amount of the dividend, we expect to
continue to pay a regular quarterly cash dividend. In connection with the establishment of our
dividend policy, we adopted a Dividend Reinvestment Plan in 2003.
During the nine month period ended September 30, 2010, we received proceeds of $2,470,000 from
the exercise of stock options by employees. Additionally, as a result of deductions derived from
the stock option exercises, we recognized an income tax
benefit of $1,262,000.
Line of Credit
We have a $36,000,000 bank line of credit on which we may draw to meet short-term liquidity
requirements in excess of internally generated cash flow. Amounts drawn under the line of credit
are payable upon demand. At September 30, 2010, there were no borrowings under the line. However,
at such date, we had outstanding a $35,420,000 irrevocable standby letter of credit which relates
to payment obligations under our insurance programs. As a result of the letter of credit issued,
the amount available under the line of credit was reduced by $35,420,000 at September 30, 2010.
The line of credit requires us to satisfy two financial covenants. Such covenants, and their
status at September 30, 2010, were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Covenant Description and Requirement |
|
Status at September 30, 2010 |
|
Commitment coverage ratio: cash and cash equivalents
plus
marketable securities must equal or exceed outstanding
obligations under the line by a multiple of 2 |
|
|
2.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tangible net worth: must exceed $180,000,000 |
|
$ |
186,000,000 |
|
As noted above, we complied with the financial covenants at September 30, 2010 and expect to
continue to remain in compliance with such financial covenants. This line of credit expires on June
30, 2011. We believe the line of credit will be renewed at that time.
Accounts and Notes Receivable
We expend considerable effort to collect the amounts due for our services on the terms agreed
upon with our clients. Many of our clients participate in programs funded by federal and state
governmental agencies which historically have encountered delays in making payments to its program
participants. Congress has enacted a number of laws during the past decade that have significantly
altered, or may alter, overall government reimbursement for nursing home services. Because our
clients revenues are generally reliant on Medicare and Medicaid reimbursement funding rates and
mechanisms, the overall effect of these laws and trends in the long term care industry have
affected and could adversely affect the liquidity of our clients, resulting in their inability to
make payments to us on agreed upon payment terms. These factors, in addition to delays in payments
from clients, have resulted in and could continue to result in significant additional bad debts in
the near future. Whenever possible, when a client falls behind in making agreed-upon payments, we
convert the unpaid accounts receivable to interest bearing promissory notes. The promissory notes
receivable provide a means by which to further evidence the amounts owed and provide a definitive
repayment plan and therefore may ultimately enhance our ability to collect the amounts due. At
September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, we had $10,731,000 and $9,257,000, net of reserves,
respectively, of such promissory notes outstanding. Additionally, we consider restructuring service
agreements from full service to management-only service in the case of certain clients experiencing
financial difficulties. We believe that such restructurings may provide us with a means to maintain
a relationship with the client while at the same time minimizing collection exposure.
As a result of the current economic crisis, many states have significant budget deficits.
State Medicaid programs are experiencing increased demand, and with lower revenues than projected,
they have fewer resources to support their Medicaid programs. In addition, in March 2010,
comprehensive health care reform legislation under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act
and the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010 (together, the Act) were signed into
law. The Act will significantly impact the governmental healthcare programs our clients participate
in, and reimbursements received there under from governmental or third-party payors. Furthermore,
in the coming year, new proposals or additional changes in existing regulations could be made to
the Act which could directly impact the governmental reimbursement programs in which our clients
participate. As a result, some state Medicaid programs are reconsidering previously approved
increases in nursing home reimbursement or are considering delaying those increases. A few states
have indicated it is possible they will run out of cash to pay Medicaid providers, including
nursing homes. Any negative changes in our clients reimbursements would negatively impact our
results of operations. Although we are currently evaluating the Acts effect on our client base, we
may not know the full effect until such a time as these laws are fully implemented and the Centers
for Medicare and Medicaid Services and other agencies issue applicable regulations or
guidance.
32
We have had varying collection experience with respect to our accounts and notes receivable.
When contractual terms are not met, we generally encounter difficulty in collecting amounts due
from certain of our clients. Therefore, we have sometimes been required to extend the period of
payment for certain clients beyond contractual terms. These clients include those who have
terminated service agreements and slow payers experiencing financial difficulties. In order to
provide for these collection problems and the general risk associated with the granting of credit
terms, we have recorded bad debt provisions (in an Allowance for Doubtful Accounts) of $1,550,000
and $1,956,000 for the nine month periods ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively. These
provisions represent approximately 0.3% and 0.4%, as a percentage of total revenues for such
respective periods. In making our credit evaluations, in addition to analyzing and anticipating,
where possible, the specific cases described above, we consider the general collection risk
associated with trends in the long-term care industry. We also establish credit limits, perform
ongoing credit evaluation and monitor accounts to minimize the risk of loss. Notwithstanding our
efforts to minimize credit risk exposure, our clients could be adversely affected if future
industry trends change in such a manner as to negatively impact their cash flows. If our clients
experience a negative impact in their cash flows, it would have a material adverse effect on our
results of operations and financial condition.
At September 30, 2010, amounts due from our Major Client represented less than 1% of our
accounts receivable balance. However, if such client changes its payments terms, it would increase
our accounts receivable balance and have a material adverse affect on our cash flows and cash and
cash equivalents.
Insurance Programs
We have a Paid Loss Retrospective Insurance Plan for general liability and workers
compensation insurance. Under these plans, pre-determined loss limits are arranged with an
insurance company to limit both our per-occurrence cash outlay and annual insurance plan cost.
For workers compensation, we record a reserve based on the present value of future payments,
including an estimate of claims incurred but not reported, that are developed as a result of a
review of our historical data and open claims. The present value of the payout is determined by
applying an 8% discount factor against the estimated value of the claims over the estimated
remaining pay-out period.
For general liability, we record a reserve for the estimated ultimate amounts to be paid for
known claims. The estimated ultimate reserve amount recorded is derived from the estimated claim
reserves provided by our insurance carrier reduced by an historical experience factor.
We regularly evaluate our claims pay-out experience, present value factor and other factors
related to the nature of specific claims in arriving at the basis for our accrued insurance claims
estimate. Our evaluation is based primarily on current information derived from reviewing our
claims experience and industry trends. In the event that our claims experience and/ or industry
trends result in an unfavorable change, it would have an adverse effect on our results of
operations and financial condition.
Capital Expenditures
The level of capital expenditures is generally dependent on the number of new clients
obtained. Such capital expenditures primarily consist of housekeeping equipment purchases, laundry
and linen equipment installations, and computer hardware and software. Although we have no specific
material commitments for capital expenditures through the end of calendar year 2010, we estimate
that for the remainder of 2010 we will have capital expenditures of approximately $500,000 to
$1,500,000 in connection with housekeeping equipment purchases and laundry and linen equipment
installations in our clients facilities, as well as expenditures relating to internal data
processing hardware and software requirements. We believe that our cash from operations, existing
cash and cash equivalents balance and credit line will be adequate for the foreseeable future to
satisfy the needs of our operations and to fund our anticipated growth. However, should these
sources not be sufficient, we would, if necessary, seek to obtain necessary working capital from
such sources as long-term debt or equity financing.
33
Material Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We have no material off-balance sheet arrangements, other than our irrevocable standby letter
of credit previously discussed.
Effects of Inflation
Although there can be no assurance thereof, we believe that in most instances we will be able
to recover increases in costs attributable to inflation by passing through such cost increases to
our clients.
34
ITEM 3 QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURE ABOUT MARKET RISK
Management does not believe that there is any material market risk exposure with respect to
derivative or other financial instruments that would require disclosure under this item.
ITEM
4 CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Disclosure controls are procedures that are designed with the objective of ensuring that
information required to be disclosed in our reports under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the
Exchange Act), such as this Form 10-Q, is reported in accordance with Securities and Exchange
Commission (SEC) rules. Disclosure controls are also designed with the objective of ensuring that
such information is accumulated and communicated to management, including the Chief Executive
Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required
disclosure.
Based on their evaluation as of September 30, 2010, pursuant to Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(b),
our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, believe our
disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act 13a-15(e) are effective.
In connection with the evaluation pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(d) of our internal
control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(f)) by our management,
including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, no changes during the three
month period and nine month period ended September 30, 2010, were identified that have materially
affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial
reporting.
Certifications
Certifications of the Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer regarding,
among other items, disclosure controls and procedures are included as exhibits to this Form 10-Q.
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 1. Legal Proceedings.
In the ordinary course of business, we are involved in various legal proceedings and have
certain unresolved claims pending. Based on information currently available, management believes
that an adverse decision on these ordinary business issues, individually or in the aggregate would
not have a materially adverse impact on our business or financial condition.
ITEM 1A. Risk Factors
There has been no material change in the risk factors set forth in Part I, Item 1A, Risk
Factors in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009.
ITEM 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.
None
ITEM 3. Defaults under Senior Securities.
Not Applicable
35
ITEM 4. (Removed and Reserved)
ITEM 5. Other Information.
a) None
36
ITEM 6. Exhibits
a) Exhibits
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.1 |
|
|
Certification of Principal Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.2 |
|
|
Certification of Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
32.1 |
|
|
Certification of Principal Executive Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
32.2 |
|
|
Certification of Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 |
37
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant had duly
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
HEALTHCARE SERVICES GROUP, INC. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
October 22, 2010
|
|
/s/ Daniel P. McCartney
|
|
|
Date
|
|
DANIEL P. McCARTNEY, |
|
|
|
|
Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
October 22, 2010
|
|
/s/ Richard W. Hudson |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date
|
|
RICHARD W. HUDSON, |
|
|
|
|
Chief Financial Officer and Secretary |
|
|
38