e10vq
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
Washington, D.C.
20549
Form 10-Q
|
|
|
(Mark One)
|
þ
|
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
|
|
For the quarterly period ended
July 30, 2010
|
Or
|
|
|
|
o
|
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
For the transition period
from to .
|
Commission File Number: 0-17017
Dell Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
|
|
74-2487834
|
(State or other jurisdiction
of incorporation or organization)
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
|
One Dell Way
Round Rock, Texas 78682
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)
1-800-BUY-DELL
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed
all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding
12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant
was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past
90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted
electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any,
every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of
Regulation S-T
(§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding
12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant
was required to submit and post such
files). Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large
accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated
filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of
large accelerated filer, accelerated
filer and smaller reporting company in
Rule 12b-2
of the Exchange Act.
|
|
|
Large accelerated
filer þ
|
|
Accelerated
filer o
|
Non-accelerated
filer o (Do
not check if a smaller reporting company)
|
|
Smaller reporting
company o
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company
(as defined in
Rule 12b-2
of the Exchange
Act). Yes o No þ
As of the close of business on August 20, 2010,
1,944,708,225 shares of common stock, par value $.01 per
share, were outstanding.
CAUTIONARY
NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This report includes forward-looking statements. The
words may, will, anticipate,
estimate, expect, intend,
plan, aim and similar expressions as
they relate to us or our management are intended to identify
these forward-looking statements. All statements by us regarding
our expected financial position, revenues, cash flows and other
operating results, business strategy, legal proceedings and
similar matters are forward-looking statements. Our expectations
expressed or implied in these forward-looking statements may not
turn out to be correct. Our results could be materially
different from our expectations because of various risks,
including the risks discussed in Part I
Item 1A Risk Factors of our Annual Report
on
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended January 29, 2010 and in our
subsequently filed SEC reports. Any forward-looking statement
speaks only as of the date on which such statement is made, and,
except as required by law, we undertake no obligation to update
any forward-looking statement to reflect events or
circumstances, including unanticipated events, after the date as
of which such statement is made.
PART I
FINANCIAL INFORMATION
|
|
ITEM 1.
|
FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS
|
DELL
INC.
(in millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
July 30,
|
|
January 29,
|
|
|
2010
|
|
2010
|
|
|
(unaudited)
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
Current assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
11,694
|
|
|
$
|
10,635
|
|
Short-term investments
|
|
|
744
|
|
|
|
373
|
|
Accounts receivable, net
|
|
|
6,565
|
|
|
|
5,837
|
|
Financing receivables, net
|
|
|
3,272
|
|
|
|
2,706
|
|
Inventories, net
|
|
|
1,372
|
|
|
|
1,051
|
|
Other current assets
|
|
|
3,562
|
|
|
|
3,643
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
27,209
|
|
|
|
24,245
|
|
Property, plant, and equipment, net
|
|
|
1,980
|
|
|
|
2,181
|
|
Investments
|
|
|
633
|
|
|
|
781
|
|
Long-term financing receivables, net
|
|
|
622
|
|
|
|
332
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
4,264
|
|
|
|
4,074
|
|
Purchased intangible assets, net
|
|
|
1,638
|
|
|
|
1,694
|
|
Other non-current assets
|
|
|
294
|
|
|
|
345
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
36,640
|
|
|
$
|
33,652
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
|
Current liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term debt
|
|
$
|
1,627
|
|
|
$
|
663
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
12,465
|
|
|
|
11,373
|
|
Accrued and other
|
|
|
3,812
|
|
|
|
3,884
|
|
Short-term deferred services revenue
|
|
|
3,009
|
|
|
|
3,040
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
20,913
|
|
|
|
18,960
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
3,623
|
|
|
|
3,417
|
|
Long-term deferred services revenue
|
|
|
3,311
|
|
|
|
3,029
|
|
Other non-current liabilities
|
|
|
2,632
|
|
|
|
2,605
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
30,479
|
|
|
|
28,011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies (Note 12)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock and capital in excess of $.01 par value; shares
authorized: 7,000; shares issued: 3,365 and 3,351, respectively;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
shares outstanding: 1,945 and 1,957, respectively
|
|
|
11,608
|
|
|
|
11,472
|
|
Treasury stock at cost: 945 shares and 919 shares,
respectively
|
|
|
(28,304
|
)
|
|
|
(27,904
|
)
|
Retained earnings
|
|
|
22,984
|
|
|
|
22,110
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
|
|
|
(127
|
)
|
|
|
(37
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity
|
|
|
6,161
|
|
|
|
5,641
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity
|
|
$
|
36,640
|
|
|
$
|
33,652
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Condensed
Consolidated Financial Statements.
1
DELL
INC.
(in millions, except per share amounts; unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
July 30,
|
|
July 31,
|
|
July 30,
|
|
July 31,
|
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
Net revenue:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Products
|
|
$
|
12,645
|
|
|
$
|
10,623
|
|
|
$
|
24,731
|
|
|
$
|
20,855
|
|
Services, including software related
|
|
|
2,889
|
|
|
|
2,141
|
|
|
|
5,677
|
|
|
|
4,251
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net revenue
|
|
|
15,534
|
|
|
|
12,764
|
|
|
|
30,408
|
|
|
|
25,106
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of net revenue:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Products
|
|
|
10,931
|
|
|
|
8,978
|
|
|
|
21,316
|
|
|
|
17,764
|
|
Services, including software related
|
|
|
2,017
|
|
|
|
1,395
|
|
|
|
3,990
|
|
|
|
2,783
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cost of net revenue
|
|
|
12,948
|
|
|
|
10,373
|
|
|
|
25,306
|
|
|
|
20,547
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross margin
|
|
|
2,586
|
|
|
|
2,391
|
|
|
|
5,102
|
|
|
|
4,559
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, general, and administrative
|
|
|
1,679
|
|
|
|
1,571
|
|
|
|
3,509
|
|
|
|
3,184
|
|
Research, development, and engineering
|
|
|
162
|
|
|
|
149
|
|
|
|
329
|
|
|
|
290
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
1,841
|
|
|
|
1,720
|
|
|
|
3,838
|
|
|
|
3,474
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
745
|
|
|
|
671
|
|
|
|
1,264
|
|
|
|
1,085
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest and other, net
|
|
|
(49
|
)
|
|
|
(42
|
)
|
|
|
(117
|
)
|
|
|
(44
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes
|
|
|
696
|
|
|
|
629
|
|
|
|
1,147
|
|
|
|
1,041
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax provision
|
|
|
151
|
|
|
|
157
|
|
|
|
261
|
|
|
|
279
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
545
|
|
|
$
|
472
|
|
|
$
|
886
|
|
|
$
|
762
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
0.28
|
|
|
$
|
0.24
|
|
|
$
|
0.45
|
|
|
$
|
0.39
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
0.28
|
|
|
$
|
0.24
|
|
|
$
|
0.45
|
|
|
$
|
0.39
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average shares outstanding:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
1,952
|
|
|
|
1,955
|
|
|
|
1,956
|
|
|
|
1,952
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
1,960
|
|
|
|
1,960
|
|
|
|
1,967
|
|
|
|
1,956
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Condensed
Consolidated Financial Statements.
2
DELL
INC.
(in millions; unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
July 30,
|
|
July 31,
|
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
Cash flows from operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
886
|
|
|
$
|
762
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by
operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
511
|
|
|
|
402
|
|
Stock-based compensation
|
|
|
156
|
|
|
|
146
|
|
Effects of exchange rate changes on monetary assets and
liabilities denominated in foreign currencies
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
|
26
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
(55
|
)
|
|
|
(140
|
)
|
Provision for doubtful accounts - including financing
receivables
|
|
|
217
|
|
|
|
210
|
|
Other
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
Changes in assets and liabilities, net of effects from
acquisitions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
|
(896
|
)
|
|
|
(593
|
)
|
Financing receivables
|
|
|
(413
|
)
|
|
|
(379
|
)
|
Inventories
|
|
|
(318
|
)
|
|
|
29
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
|
(24
|
)
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
1,131
|
|
|
|
1,318
|
|
Deferred services revenue
|
|
|
265
|
|
|
|
44
|
|
Accrued and other liabilities
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in cash from operating activities
|
|
|
1,573
|
|
|
|
1,837
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases
|
|
|
(1,063
|
)
|
|
|
(776
|
)
|
Maturities and sales
|
|
|
838
|
|
|
|
982
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
(191
|
)
|
|
|
(179
|
)
|
Proceeds from sale of facility and land
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
Acquisition of business, net of cash received
|
|
|
(222
|
)
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in cash from investing activities
|
|
|
(620
|
)
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repurchase of common stock
|
|
|
(400
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
Issuance of common stock under employee plans
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Issuance (repayment) of commercial paper (maturity 90 days
or less), net
|
|
|
724
|
|
|
|
(100
|
)
|
Proceeds from debt
|
|
|
609
|
|
|
|
1,491
|
|
Repayments of debt
|
|
|
(819
|
)
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
Other
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in cash from financing activities
|
|
|
125
|
|
|
|
1,379
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
(19
|
)
|
|
|
91
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
1,059
|
|
|
|
3,347
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
|
|
|
10,635
|
|
|
|
8,352
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
|
|
$
|
11,694
|
|
|
$
|
11,699
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Condensed
Consolidated Financial Statements.
3
DELL
INC.
(unaudited)
NOTE 1
BASIS OF PRESENTATION
Basis of Presentation The accompanying
Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements of Dell Inc.
(individually and together with its consolidated subsidiaries,
Dell) should be read in conjunction with the
Consolidated Financial Statements and accompanying Notes filed
with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission
(SEC) in Dells Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended January 29, 2010. The
accompanying Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements have
been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States of America (GAAP). In
the opinion of management, the accompanying Condensed
Consolidated Financial Statements reflect all adjustments of a
normal recurring nature considered necessary to fairly state the
financial position of Dell and its consolidated subsidiaries at
July 30, 2010, the results of its operations for the three
and six months ended July 30, 2010, and July 31, 2009,
and its cash flows for the six months ended July 30, 2010,
and July 31, 2009.
The preparation of financial statements in accordance with GAAP
requires management to make estimates and assumptions that
affect the amounts reported in Dells Condensed
Consolidated Financial Statements and the accompanying Notes.
Actual results could differ materially from those estimates. The
results of operations for the three and six months ended
July 30, 2010, and July 31, 2009, and its cash flows
for the six months ended July 30, 2010, and July 31,
2009, are not necessarily indicative of the results to be
expected for the full year.
Recently
Issued and Adopted Accounting Pronouncements
Revenue Arrangements with Multiple Deliverables
In September 2009, the Emerging Issues Task Force of
the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB)
reached consensus on two issues which affects the timing of
revenue recognition. The first consensus changes the level of
evidence of standalone selling price required to separate
deliverables in a multiple deliverable revenue arrangement by
allowing a company to make its best estimate of the selling
price (ESP) of deliverables when more objective
evidence of selling price is not available and eliminates the
use of the residual method. The consensus applies to multiple
deliverable revenue arrangements that are not accounted for
under other accounting pronouncements and retains the use of
vendor specific objective evidence of selling price
(VSOE) if available and third-party evidence of
selling price (TPE), when VSOE is unavailable. The
second consensus excludes sales of tangible products that
contain essential software elements, that is, software enabled
devices, from the scope of revenue recognition requirements for
software arrangements. Dell elected to early adopt this
accounting guidance at the beginning of the first quarter of
Fiscal 2011 on a prospective basis for applicable transactions
originating or materially modified after January 29, 2010.
Dells multiple deliverable arrangements generally include
hardware products that are sold with services such as extended
warranty services, installation, maintenance, and other services
contracts. The nature and terms of these multiple deliverable
arrangements will vary based on the customized needs of
Dells customers. Maintenance, support, and other services
are generally delivered according to the terms of the
arrangement after the initial sale of hardware or software.
Dells service contracts may include a combination of
services arrangements including deployment, asset recovery,
recycling, IT outsourcing, consulting, applications development,
applications maintenance, and business process services. These
service contracts may include provisions for cancellation,
termination, refunds, or service level adjustments. These
contract provisions would not have a significant impact on
recognized revenue as Dell generally recognizes revenue for
these contracts as the services are performed.
The adoption of the new guidance on multiple deliverable
arrangements did not change the manner in which Dell accounts
for its multiple deliverable arrangements as Dell did not use
the residual method for the majority of its offerings and its
services offerings are generally sold on a standalone basis
where evidence of selling price is available. Most of
Dells products and services qualify as separate units of
accounting. Prior to the first quarter of Fiscal 2011, Dell
allocated revenue from multiple-element arrangements to the
multiple elements based on the relative fair value of each
element, which was generally based on the relative sales price
of each element when sold separately. Because selling price is
generally available based on standalone sales, Dell has limited
application of
4
DELL
INC.
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(unaudited)
TPE, as determined by comparison of pricing for products and
services to the pricing of similar products and services as
offered by Dell or its competitors in standalone sales to
similarly situated customers. Thus, the adoption of this
consensus had no impact on Dells consolidated financial
statements as of and for the first and second quarters of Fiscal
2011, or the year ended January 29, 2010.
Pursuant to the new guidance on revenue recognition for software
enabled products, certain Dell storage products are no longer
included in the scope of the software revenue recognition
guidance. Prior to the new guidance, Dell established fair value
for Post Contract Customer Support (PCS) for these
products, based on VSOE and used the residual method to allocate
revenue to the delivered elements. Under the new guidance, the
revenue for what was previously deemed PCS is now considered
part of a multiple element arrangement. As such, any discount is
allocated to all elements based on the relative selling price of
both delivered and undelivered elements. The impact of applying
this consensus was not material to Dells consolidated
financial statements as of and for the first and second quarters
of Fiscal 2011, or the year ended January 29, 2010.
As new products are introduced in future periods, Dell may be
required to use TPE or ESP, depending on the specific facts at
the time.
Variable Interest Entities and Transfers of Financial Assets
and Extinguishments of Liabilities The
pronouncement on transfers of financial assets and
extinguishments of liabilities removes the concept of a
qualifying special-purpose entity and removes the exception from
applying variable interest entity accounting to qualifying
special-purpose entities. The pronouncement on variable interest
entities requires an entity to perform an ongoing analysis to
determine whether the entitys variable interest or
interests give it a controlling financial interest in a variable
interest entity. The pronouncements were effective for fiscal
years beginning after November 15, 2009. Dell adopted the
pronouncements at the beginning of the first quarter of Fiscal
2011. The adoption of these two pronouncements resulted in
Dells consolidation of its two qualifying special purpose
entities. See Note 5 of Notes to Condensed Consolidated
Financial Statements for additional information on the impact of
the consolidation.
Recently
Issued Accounting Pronouncements
Credit Quality of Financing Receivables and the Allowance for
Credit Losses In July 2010, FASB issued a
new pronouncement that requires enhanced disclosures regarding
the nature of credit risk inherent in an entitys portfolio
of financing receivables, how that risk is analyzed, and the
changes and reasons for those changes in the allowance for
credit losses. The new disclosures will require information for
both the financing receivables and the related allowance for
credit losses at more disaggregated levels. Disclosures related
to information as of the end of a reporting period will become
effective for Dell in the fourth quarter of Fiscal 2011.
Specific disclosures regarding activities that occur during a
reporting period, such as the disaggregated rollforward
disclosures, will be required for Dell beginning in the first
quarter of Fiscal 2012. As these changes only relate to
disclosures, they will not have an impact on Dells
consolidated financial results.
Reclassifications To maintain
comparability among the periods presented, Dell has revised the
presentation of certain prior period amounts reported within
cash flows from operating activities presented in the Condensed
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows. The revision had no
impact on the total change in cash from operating activities.
5
DELL
INC.
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(unaudited)
NOTE 2
INVENTORIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
July 30,
|
|
January 29,
|
|
|
2010
|
|
2010
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
Inventories:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Production materials
|
|
$
|
673
|
|
|
$
|
487
|
|
Work-in-process
|
|
|
199
|
|
|
|
168
|
|
Finished goods
|
|
|
500
|
|
|
|
396
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inventories
|
|
$
|
1,372
|
|
|
$
|
1,051
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOTE 3
FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
The following table presents Dells hierarchy for its
assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring
basis as of July 30, 2010, and January 29, 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
July 30, 2010
|
|
January 29, 2010
|
|
|
Level 1
|
|
Level 2
|
|
Level 3
|
|
Total
|
|
Level 1
|
|
Level 2
|
|
Level 3
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Quoted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prices
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prices
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
in Active
|
|
Significant
|
|
|
|
|
|
in Active
|
|
Significant
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Markets for
|
|
Other
|
|
Significant
|
|
|
|
Markets for
|
|
Other
|
|
Significant
|
|
|
|
|
Identical
|
|
Observable
|
|
Unobservable
|
|
|
|
Identical
|
|
Observable
|
|
Unobservable
|
|
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
Inputs
|
|
Inputs
|
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
Inputs
|
|
Inputs
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash equivalents:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial paper
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
549
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
549
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
197
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
197
|
|
U.S. government and agencies
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
82
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
82
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Debt securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. government and agencies
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
55
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
55
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
66
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
66
|
|
U.S. corporate
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
545
|
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
576
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
553
|
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
583
|
|
International corporate
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
630
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
630
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
391
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
391
|
|
State and municipal governments
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
Equity and other securities
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
96
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
96
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
90
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
90
|
|
Retained interest
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
151
|
|
|
|
151
|
|
Derivative instruments
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
120
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
120
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
96
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
96
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
2,077
|
|
|
$
|
31
|
|
|
$
|
2,108
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
1,395
|
|
|
$
|
181
|
|
|
$
|
1,576
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative instruments
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
37
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
37
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
12
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
37
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
37
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
12
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6
DELL
INC.
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(unaudited)
The following section describes the valuation methodologies Dell
uses to measure financial instruments at fair value:
Cash Equivalents The majority of
Dells cash equivalents consists of commercial paper,
including corporate and asset-backed commercial paper, and U.S.
government and agencies, all with original maturities of less
than ninety days and are valued at fair value which approximates
cost. The valuation is based on models whereby all significant
inputs are observable or can be derived from or corroborated by
observable market data. Dell utilizes a pricing service to
assist in obtaining fair value pricing for the majority of this
investment portfolio. Dell conducts reviews on a quarterly basis
to verify pricing, assess liquidity, and determine if
significant inputs have changed that would impact the fair value
hierarchy disclosure.
Debt Securities The majority of
Dells debt securities consists of various fixed income
securities such as U.S. government and agencies, U.S. and
international corporate, and state and municipal bonds. This
portfolio of investments is valued based on model driven
valuations whereby all significant inputs, including benchmark
yields, reported trades, broker-dealer quotes, issue spreads,
benchmark securities, bids, offers and other market related data
are observable or can be derived from or corroborated by
observable market data for substantially the full term of the
asset. Dell utilizes a pricing service to assist management in
obtaining fair value pricing for the majority of this investment
portfolio. Pricing for securities is based on proprietary
models, and inputs are documented in accordance with the fair
value measurements hierarchy. Dell conducts reviews on a
quarterly basis to verify pricing, assess liquidity, and
determine if significant valuation inputs have changed that
would impact the fair value hierarchy disclosure. The
Level 3 position as of July 30, 2010, and
January 29, 2010, represents a convertible debt security
that Dell was unable to corroborate with observable market data.
The investment is valued at cost plus accrued interest as this
is managements best estimate of fair value.
Equity and Other Securities The
majority of Dells investments in equity and other
securities consists of various mutual funds held in Dells
Deferred Compensation Plan. The valuation of these securities is
based on models whereby all significant inputs are observable or
can be derived from or corroborated by observable market data.
Retained Interest The fair value of
the retained interest was determined using a discounted cash
flow model. Significant assumptions to the model include pool
credit losses, payment rates, and discount rates. These
assumptions are supported by both historical experience and
anticipated trends relative to the particular receivable pool.
Retained interest in securitized receivables was included in
financing receivables, short-term and long-term, on the
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Financial Position. During
the first quarter of Fiscal 2011, Dell consolidated its
previously unconsolidated special purpose entities and as
result, the retained interest as of January 29, 2010, was
eliminated. See Note 5 of Notes to Condensed Consolidated
Financial Statements for additional information about the
consolidation of Dells previously unconsolidated special
purpose entities.
Derivative Instruments Dells
derivative financial instruments consist primarily of foreign
currency forward and purchased option contracts, and interest
rate swaps. The portfolio is valued using internal models based
on market observable inputs, including interest rate curves,
forward and spot prices for currencies, and implied
volatilities. Credit risk is factored into the fair value
calculation of Dells derivative instrument portfolio. For
interest rate derivative instruments, credit risk is determined
at the contract level with the use of credit default spreads of
either Dell, if in a net liability position, or the relevant
counterparty, when in a net asset position. For foreign exchange
derivative instruments, credit risk is determined in a similar
manner, except that the credit default spread is applied based
on the net position of each counterparty with the use of the
appropriate credit default spreads.
7
DELL
INC.
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(unaudited)
The following table shows a reconciliation of the beginning and
ending balances for fair value measurements using significant
unobservable inputs (Level 3) for the respective
periods:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
July 30, 2010
|
|
July 31, 2009
|
|
|
Retained
|
|
U.S.
|
|
|
|
Retained
|
|
U.S.
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
Corporate
|
|
Total
|
|
Interest
|
|
Corporate
|
|
Total
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
Balance at beginning of the period
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
30
|
|
|
$
|
30
|
|
|
$
|
504
|
|
|
$
|
28
|
|
|
$
|
532
|
|
Net unrealized gains (losses) included in
earnings(a)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
Issuances and settlements
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
Transfers out of
Level 3(b)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(502
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(502
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of period
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
31
|
|
|
$
|
31
|
|
|
$
|
119
|
|
|
$
|
29
|
|
|
$
|
148
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
July 30, 2010
|
|
July 31, 2009
|
|
|
Retained
|
|
U.S.
|
|
|
|
Retained
|
|
U.S.
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
Corporate
|
|
Total
|
|
Interest
|
|
Corporate
|
|
Total
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
Balance at beginning of period
|
|
$
|
151
|
|
|
$
|
30
|
|
|
$
|
181
|
|
|
$
|
396
|
|
|
$
|
27
|
|
|
$
|
423
|
|
Net unrealized gains (losses) included in
earnings(a)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
Issuances and settlements
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
217
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
217
|
|
Transfers out of
Level 3(b)
|
|
|
(151
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(151
|
)
|
|
|
(502
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(502
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of period
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
31
|
|
|
$
|
31
|
|
|
$
|
119
|
|
|
$
|
29
|
|
|
$
|
148
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
|
The unrealized gains and losses on
U.S. corporate represent accrued interest for assets that were
still held at July 30, 2010, and July 31, 2009.
|
|
|
|
(b)
|
|
Represents transfers out resulting
from the SPE consolidation. See Note 5 of Notes to
Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for additional
information on retained interest.
|
Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a
Nonrecurring Basis Certain assets are
measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis and therefore are
not included in the recurring fair value table above. The assets
consist primarily of investments accounted for under the cost
method and nonfinancial assets such as goodwill and intangible
assets. Investments accounted for under the cost method included
in equity and other securities were approximately
$20 million and $22 million, on July 30, 2010,
and January 29, 2010, respectively. Goodwill and intangible
assets are measured at fair value initially and subsequently
when there is an indicator of impairment and the impairment is
recognized. No impairment charges of goodwill and intangible
assets were recorded for the three and six months ended
July 30, 2010. See Note 9 of Notes to Condensed
Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information
about goodwill and intangible assets.
8
DELL
INC.
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(unaudited)
NOTE 4
INVESTMENTS
The following table summarizes, by major security type, the fair
value and amortized cost of Dells investments. All debt
security investments with remaining maturities in excess of one
year and substantially all equity and other securities are
recorded as long-term investments in the Condensed Consolidated
Statements of Financial Position.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
July 30, 2010
|
|
January 29, 2010
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Value
|
|
Cost
|
|
Gain
|
|
(Loss)
|
|
Value
|
|
Cost
|
|
Gain
|
|
(Loss)
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
Investments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. government and agencies
|
|
$
|
55
|
|
|
$
|
55
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
65
|
|
|
$
|
65
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
U.S. corporate
|
|
|
375
|
|
|
|
375
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
233
|
|
|
|
232
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
International corporate
|
|
|
314
|
|
|
|
314
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
75
|
|
|
|
75
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total short-term investments
|
|
|
744
|
|
|
|
744
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
373
|
|
|
|
372
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. government and agencies
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
U.S. corporate
|
|
|
201
|
|
|
|
201
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
350
|
|
|
|
349
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
International corporate
|
|
|
316
|
|
|
|
316
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
316
|
|
|
|
316
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
State and municipal governments
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Equity and other securities
|
|
|
116
|
|
|
|
116
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
112
|
|
|
|
112
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total long-term investments
|
|
|
633
|
|
|
|
633
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
781
|
|
|
|
780
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total investments
|
|
$
|
1,377
|
|
|
$
|
1,377
|
|
|
$
|
2
|
|
|
$
|
(2
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,154
|
|
|
$
|
1,152
|
|
|
$
|
4
|
|
|
$
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dells investments in debt securities are classified as
available-for-sale.
Equity and other securities primarily relate to investments held
in Dells Deferred Compensation Plan, which are classified
as trading securities. Both of these classes of securities are
reported at fair value using the specific identification method.
All other investments are initially recorded at cost and reduced
for any impairment losses. The fair value of Dells
portfolio is affected primarily by interest rate movements
rather than credit and liquidity risks.
At July 30, 2010, Dell had 81 debt securities that were in
a loss position with total unrealized losses of $2 million
and a corresponding fair value of $395 million. Dell
reviews its investment portfolio quarterly to determine if any
investment is
other-than-temporarily
impaired. An
other-than-temporary
impairment (OTTI) loss is recognized in earnings if
Dell has the intent to sell the debt security, or if it is more
likely than not that it will be required to sell the debt
security before recovery of its amortized cost basis. However,
if Dell does not expect to sell a debt security, it still
evaluates expected cash flows to be received and determines if a
credit loss exists. In the event of a credit loss, only the
amount of impairment associated with the credit loss is
recognized in earnings. Amounts relating to factors other than
credit losses are recorded in other comprehensive income. As of
July 30, 2010, Dell evaluated debt securities classified as
available-for-sale
for OTTI and the existence of credit losses and concluded no
such losses should be recognized for the six months ended
July 30, 2010.
9
DELL
INC.
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(unaudited)
NOTE 5
FINANCIAL SERVICES
Dell Financial Services L.L.C.
Dell offers or arranges various financing options and services
for its business and consumer customers in the U.S. through Dell
Financial Services L.L.C. (DFS), a wholly-owned
subsidiary of Dell. DFSs key activities include the
origination, collection, and servicing of customer receivables
related to the purchase of Dell products and services. New
financing originations, which represent the amounts of financing
provided to customers for equipment and related software and
services through DFS, were approximately $1 billion during
the three months ended July 30, 2010, and July 31,
2009, and $1.9 billion during the six months ended
July 30, 2010, and July 31, 2009.
Dell transfers certain customer financing receivables to special
purpose entities (SPEs). The SPEs are bankruptcy
remote legal entities with separate assets and liabilities. The
purpose of the SPEs is to facilitate the funding of customer
receivables in the capital markets. These SPEs have entered into
financing arrangements with multi-seller conduits that, in turn,
issue asset-backed debt securities in the capital markets.
Dells risk of loss related to securitized receivables is
limited to the amount of Dells right to receive
collections for assets securitized exceeding the amount required
to pay interest, principal, and other fees and expenses. Dell
provides credit enhancement to the securitization in the form of
over-collateralization. Prior to Fiscal 2011, the SPE that funds
revolving loans was consolidated, and the two SPEs that fund
fixed-term leases and loans were not consolidated. In accordance
with the new accounting guidance on variable interest entities
(VIEs), and transfers of financial assets and
extinguishment of financial liabilities, Dell determined that
these two SPEs would be consolidated as of the beginning of
Fiscal 2011. The primary factors in this determination were the
obligation to absorb losses due to the interest Dell retains in
the assets transferred to the SPEs in the form of
over-collateralization, and the power to direct activities
through the servicing role performed by Dell. Dell recorded the
assets and liabilities at their carrying amount as of the
beginning of Fiscal 2011, with a cumulative effect adjustment of
$13 million to the opening balance of retained earnings in
Fiscal 2011.
Dells securitization programs contain standard structural
features related to the performance of the securitized
receivables. These structural features include defined credit
losses, delinquencies, average credit scores, and excess
collections above or below specified levels. In the event one or
more of these criteria are not met and Dell is unable to
restructure the program, no further funding of receivables will
be permitted and the timing of Dells expected cash flows
from over-collateralization will be delayed. At July 30,
2010, these criteria were met.
10
DELL
INC.
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(unaudited)
Financing
Receivables
The following table summarizes the components of Dells
financing receivables:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
July 30,
|
|
January 29,
|
|
|
2010
|
|
2010
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
Financing receivables, net:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Customer receivables:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revolving loans, gross
|
|
$
|
1,976
|
|
|
$
|
2,046
|
|
Fixed-term leases and loans, gross
|
|
|
1,938
|
|
|
|
824
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Customer receivables, gross
|
|
|
3,914
|
|
|
|
2,870
|
|
Allowance for losses
|
|
|
(277
|
)
|
|
|
(237
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Customer receivables, net
|
|
|
3,637
|
|
|
|
2,633
|
|
Residual interest
|
|
|
257
|
|
|
|
254
|
|
Retained interest
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
151
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financing receivables, net
|
|
$
|
3,894
|
|
|
$
|
3,038
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term
|
|
$
|
3,272
|
|
|
$
|
2,706
|
|
Long-term
|
|
|
622
|
|
|
|
332
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financing receivables, net
|
|
$
|
3,894
|
|
|
$
|
3,038
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Customer receivables consist of all receivables which are either
owned by Dell and included in the consolidated financial
statements or held by nonconsolidated securitization SPEs in
prior periods. In prior periods, Dell had a retained interest in
the customer receivables held in nonconsolidated securitization
SPEs. The
pro forma table below shows what customer receivables would have
been if the nonconsolidated securitization SPEs were
consolidated as of January 29, 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
July 30,
|
|
January 29,
|
|
|
2010
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
|
(Pro forma)
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
Customer receivables, gross:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated receivables
|
|
$
|
3,914
|
|
|
$
|
2,870
|
|
Receivables in previously nonconsolidated SPEs
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
774
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Customer receivables, gross
|
|
$
|
3,914
|
|
|
$
|
3,644
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Customer receivables 60 days or more delinquent
|
|
$
|
125
|
|
|
$
|
138
|
|
11
DELL
INC.
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(unaudited)
Included in financing receivables, net, are receivables that are
held by consolidated VIEs as shown in the table below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
July 30,
|
|
January 29,
|
|
|
2010
|
|
2010
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
Financing receivables held by consolidated VIEs, net:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term, net
|
|
$
|
1,068
|
|
|
$
|
277
|
|
Long-term, net
|
|
|
239
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financing receivables held by consolidated VIEs, net
|
|
$
|
1,307
|
|
|
$
|
277
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table summarizes the changes in the allowance for
financing receivable losses for the three and six months ended
July 30, 2010, and July 31, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
July 30,
|
|
July 31,
|
|
July 30,
|
|
July 31,
|
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
Allowances for losses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of period
|
|
$
|
285
|
|
|
$
|
154
|
|
|
$
|
237
|
|
|
$
|
149
|
|
Incremental allowance due to VIE consolidation
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Expense charged to income statement
|
|
|
62
|
|
|
|
55
|
|
|
|
150
|
|
|
|
96
|
|
Principal charge-offs
|
|
|
(57
|
)
|
|
|
(30
|
)
|
|
|
(103
|
)
|
|
|
(60
|
)
|
Interest charge-offs
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
(23
|
)
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of period
|
|
$
|
277
|
|
|
$
|
173
|
|
|
$
|
277
|
|
|
$
|
173
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Customer
Receivables
The following is the description of the components of
Dells customer receivables:
|
|
|
|
|
Revolving loans offered under private label credit financing
programs provide qualified customers with a revolving credit
line for the purchase of products and services offered by Dell.
Revolving loans bear interest at a variable annual percentage
rate that is tied to the prime rate. Based on historical payment
patterns, revolving loan transactions are typically repaid
within 12 months. Revolving loans are included in
short-term financing receivables. From time to time, account
holders may have the opportunity to finance their Dell purchases
with special programs during which, if the outstanding balance
is paid in full by a specific date, no interest is charged.
These special programs generally range from six to
12 months. At July 30, 2010, and January 29,
2010, receivables under these special programs were
$381 million and $442 million, respectively.
|
|
|
|
Dell enters into sales-type lease arrangements with customers
who desire lease financing. Leases with business customers have
fixed terms of generally two to four years. Future maturities of
minimum lease payments at July 30, 2010 for Dell are as
follows: Fiscal 2011 $502 million; Fiscal
2012 $667 million; Fiscal 2013
$377 million; Fiscal 2014 and beyond
$75 million. Fixed-term loans are offered to qualified
small businesses, large commercial accounts, governmental
organizations, and educational entities.
|
12
DELL
INC.
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(unaudited)
Residual
Interest
Dell retains a residual interest in equipment leased under its
fixed-term lease programs. The amount of the residual interest
is established at the inception of the lease based upon
estimates of the value of the equipment at the end of the lease
term using historical studies, industry data, and future
value-at-risk
demand valuation methods. On a quarterly basis, Dell assesses
the carrying amount of its recorded residual values for
impairment. Anticipated declines in specific future residual
values that are considered to be
other-than-temporary
are recorded currently in earnings.
Asset
Securitizations
|
|
|
|
|
The gross balance of securitized receivables reported
off-balance sheet as of January 29, 2010, was
$774 million, and the associated debt was
$624 million. As discussed above, as of the beginning of
Fiscal 2011, all previously nonconsolidated qualified special
purpose entities were consolidated. Upon consolidation of these
customer receivables and associated debt at the beginning of
Fiscal 2011, Dells retained interest in securitized
receivables of $151 million at January 29, 2010, was
eliminated. A $13 million decrease to beginning retained
earnings for Fiscal 2011 was recorded as a cumulative effect
adjustment due to adoption of the new accounting guidance.
|
|
|
|
During the second quarters of Fiscal 2011 and Fiscal 2010,
$524 million and $262 million of customer receivables,
respectively, were funded via securitization through SPEs.
During the six months ended July 30, 2010, and
July 31, 2009, $1 billion and $495 million,
respectively, of customer receivables were funded via
securitization through SPEs.
|
|
|
|
The structured financing debt related to the fixed-term lease
and loan, and revolving loan securitization programs was
$918 million and $788 million as of July 30,
2010, and January 29, 2010, respectively. This includes
$624 million at January 29, 2010, held by
nonconsolidated SPEs. The debt is collateralized solely by the
financing receivables in the programs. The debt has a variable
interest rate and an average duration of 12 to 36 months
based on the terms of the underlying financing receivables. The
maximum debt capacity related to the securitization programs is
$1.1 billion. See Note 6 of the Notes to the Condensed
Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information
regarding the structured financing debt.
|
|
|
|
During the first half of Fiscal 2011, Dell entered into interest
rate swap agreements to effectively convert a portion of the
structured financing debt from a floating rate to a fixed rate.
The interest rate swaps qualified for hedge accounting treatment
as cash flow hedges. See Note 7 of Notes to Condensed
Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information
about interest rate swaps.
|
Retained
Interest
Prior to adopting the new accounting guidance on VIEs and
transfers of financial assets and extinguishment of financial
liabilities, certain transfers of financial assets to
nonconsolidated qualified SPEs were accounted for as a sale.
Upon the sale of the customer receivables to the SPEs, Dell
recognized a gain on the sale and retained a residual beneficial
interest in the pool of assets sold, referred to as retained
interest. The retained interest represented Dells right to
receive collections for assets securitized exceeding the amount
required to pay interest, principal, and other fees and expenses.
Retained interest was stated at the present value of the
estimated net beneficial cash flows after payment of all senior
interests. Dell valued the retained interest at the time of each
receivable transfer and at the end of each reporting period. The
fair value of the retained interest was determined using a
discounted cash flow model with various key assumptions,
including payment rates, credit losses, discount rates, and the
remaining life of the receivables sold. These assumptions were
supported by both Dells historical experience and
anticipated trends relative to the particular receivable pool.
The key valuation assumptions for retained interest could have
been affected by many factors, including repayment terms and the
credit quality of receivables securitized.
13
DELL
INC.
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(unaudited)
The following table summarizes the activity in retained interest
for the three and six months ended July 31, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
Six Months
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
July 31,
|
|
July 31,
|
|
|
2009
|
|
2009
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
Retained interest:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retained interest at beginning of period
|
|
$
|
504
|
|
|
$
|
396
|
|
Issuances
|
|
|
125
|
|
|
|
252
|
|
Distributions from conduits
|
|
|
(25
|
)
|
|
|
(35
|
)
|
Net accretion
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
Change in fair value for the period
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
(16
|
)
|
Impact of special purpose entity consolidation
|
|
|
(502
|
)
|
|
|
(502
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retained interest at end of period
|
|
$
|
119
|
|
|
$
|
119
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The table below summarizes the key assumptions used to measure
the fair value of the retained interest at time of transfer
during the three months ended July 31, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average Key Assumptions
|
|
|
Monthly
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payment
|
|
Credit
|
|
Discount
|
|
|
|
|
Rates
|
|
Losses
|
|
Rates
|
|
Life
|
|
|
|
|
(lifetime)
|
|
(annualized)
|
|
(months)
|
Time of transfer valuation of retained interest
|
|
|
5%
|
|
|
|
1%
|
|
|
|
12%
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
The charge-off statistics for securitized leases and loans held
by nonconsolidated special purpose entities are:
|
|
|
|
|
Net principal charge-offs on securitized receivables were
$30 million for the three months ended July 31, 2009,
which when annualized represents 8.8% of the average outstanding
securitized financing receivable balance for the period.
|
|
|
|
Net principal charge-offs on securitized receivables were
$66 million for the six months ended July 31, 2009,
which when annualized represents 9.7% of the average outstanding
securitized financing receivable balance for the period.
|
14
DELL
INC.
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(unaudited)
NOTE 6
BORROWINGS
The following table summarizes Dells outstanding debt at:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
July 30,
|
|
January 29,
|
|
|
2010
|
|
2010
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
Long-Term Debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$400 million issued on June 10, 2009, at 3.375% due
June 2012 (2012 Notes) with interest
payable June 15 and December 15
(includes hedge accounting adjustments)
|
|
$
|
404
|
|
|
$
|
401
|
|
$600 million issued on April 17, 2008, at 4.70% due
April 2013 (2013 Notes) with interest
payable April 15 and October 15
(includes hedge accounting adjustments)
|
|
|
613
|
|
|
|
599
|
|
$500 million issued on April 1, 2009, at 5.625% due
April 2014 (2014 Notes) with interest
payable April 15 and October 15
|
|
|
500
|
|
|
|
500
|
|
$500 million issued on April 17, 2008, at 5.65% due
April 2018 (2018 Notes) with interest
payable April 15 and October 15
|
|
|
499
|
|
|
|
499
|
|
$600 million issued on June 10, 2009, at 5.875% due
June 2019 (2019 Notes) with interest
payable June 15 and December 15
|
|
|
600
|
|
|
|
600
|
|
$400 million issued on April 17, 2008, at 6.50% due
April 2038 (2038 Notes) with interest
payable April 15 and October 15
|
|
|
400
|
|
|
|
400
|
|
Senior Debentures
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$300 million issued on April 3, 1998, at 7.10% due
April 2028 with interest payable April 15 and
October 15 (includes the impact of interest rate swap
terminations)
|
|
|
392
|
|
|
|
394
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
India term loan: entered into on October 15, 2009, at 8.9%
due October 2011 with interest payable monthly
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
Structured financing debt
|
|
|
192
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total long-term debt
|
|
|
3,623
|
|
|
|
3,417
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-Term Debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial paper
|
|
|
900
|
|
|
|
496
|
|
Structured financing debt
|
|
|
726
|
|
|
|
164
|
|
Other
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total short-term debt
|
|
|
1,627
|
|
|
|
663
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total debt
|
|
$
|
5,250
|
|
|
$
|
4,080
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The estimated fair value of total debt at July 30, 2010,
was approximately $5.5 billion. The fair values of the
India term loan, structured financing debt, commercial paper,
and other short-term debt approximate their carrying values. The
carrying value of the Senior Debentures includes an unamortized
amount related to the termination of interest rate swap
agreements in the fourth quarter of Fiscal 2009, which were
previously designated as hedges of the debt.
During the first quarter of Fiscal 2011 and fourth quarter of
Fiscal 2010, Dell entered into interest rate swap agreements to
effectively convert the fixed rates of the 2012 Notes and 2013
Notes to floating rates. The floating
15
DELL
INC.
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(unaudited)
rates are based on six-month or three-month LIBOR plus a fixed
rate. The interest rate swaps qualified for hedge accounting
treatment as fair value hedges. See Note 7 of Notes to
Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for additional
information about interest rate swaps.
The indentures governing the Notes, the Senior Debentures, and
the structured financing debt contain customary events of
default, including failure to make required payments, failure to
comply with certain agreements or covenants, and certain events
of bankruptcy and insolvency. The indentures also contain
covenants limiting Dells ability to create certain liens;
enter into
sale-and-lease
back transactions; and consolidate or merge with, or convey,
transfer or lease all or substantially all of its assets to,
another person. As of July 30, 2010, there were no events
of default with respect to the Notes, the Senior Debentures, or
the structured financing debt.
Structured Financing Debt As of
July 30, 2010, Dell had $918 million outstanding in
structured financing related debt through the fixed term lease
and loan and revolving loan securitization programs. See
Note 5 and Note 7 of the Notes to Condensed
Consolidated Financial Statements for further discussion on
structured financing debt and its related interest rate swap
agreements.
Commercial Paper During the second quarter of
Fiscal 2011, Dell entered into a new agreement to expand its
commercial paper program from $1.5 billion to
$2 billion. At July 30, 2010, and January 29,
2010, there was $900 million and $496 million,
respectively, outstanding under the commercial paper program.
The weighted-average interest rate on these outstanding
short-term borrowings was 0.23% and 0.24%, respectively.
During the first quarter of Fiscal 2011, Dell expanded the
revolving credit facilities from $1.5 billion to
$2 billion. Dells $2 billion in credit
facilities consist of two agreements with $1 billion
expiring on June 1, 2011 and the remaining $1 billion
expiring on April 2, 2013. The credit facilities require
compliance with conditions that must be satisfied prior to any
borrowing, as well as ongoing compliance with specified
affirmative and negative covenants, including maintenance of a
minimum interest coverage ratio. As of July 30, 2010, there
were no events of default and Dell was in compliance with its
minimum interest coverage ratio covenant. Amounts outstanding
under the facilities may be accelerated for events of default,
including failure to pay principal or interest, breaches of
covenants, or non-payment of judgments or debt obligations.
There were no outstanding advances under the related revolving
credit facilities as of July 30, 2010.
NOTE 7
DERIVATIVE INSTRUMENTS AND HEDGING ACTIVITIES
Derivative
Instruments
As part of its risk management strategy, Dell uses derivative
instruments, primarily forward contracts and purchased options,
to hedge certain foreign currency exposures and interest rate
swaps to manage the exposure of its debt portfolio to interest
rate risk. Dells objective is to offset gains and losses
resulting from these exposures with gains and losses on the
derivative contracts used to hedge the exposures, thereby
reducing volatility of earnings and protecting fair values of
assets and liabilities. Dell applies hedge accounting based upon
the criteria established by accounting guidance for derivative
instruments and hedging activities, including designation of its
derivatives as fair value hedges or cash flow hedges and
assessment of hedge effectiveness. Dell records all derivatives
in its Condensed Consolidated Statements of Financial Position
at fair value.
Cash Flow
Hedges
Dell uses a combination of forward contracts and purchased
options designated as cash flow hedges to protect against the
foreign currency exchange rate risks inherent in its forecasted
transactions denominated in currencies other than the U.S.
dollar. The risk of loss associated with purchased options is
limited to premium amounts paid for the option contracts. The
risk of loss associated with forward contracts is equal to the
exchange rate differential from the time the contract is entered
into until the time it is settled. The majority of these
contracts typically expire in 12 months or less.
16
DELL
INC.
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(unaudited)
Dell uses interest rate swaps designated as cash flow hedges to
hedge the variability in cash flows related to the interest rate
payments on structured financing debt. The interest rate swaps
economically convert the variable rate on the structured
financing debt to a fixed interest rate to match the underlying
fixed rate being received on fixed term customer leases and
loans. The duration of these contracts typically ranges from 30
to 42 months.
For derivative instruments that are designated and qualify as
cash flow hedges, Dell records the effective portion of the gain
or loss on the derivative instrument in accumulated other
comprehensive income (loss) as a separate component of
stockholders equity and reclassifies these amounts into
earnings in the period during which the hedged transaction is
recognized in earnings. Dell reports the effective portion of
cash flow hedges in the same financial statement line item
within earnings as the changes in value of the hedged item.
For derivative instruments designated as cash flow hedges, Dell
assesses hedge effectiveness both at the onset of the hedge and
at regular intervals throughout the life of the derivative. Dell
measures hedge ineffectiveness by comparing the cumulative
change in the fair value of the hedge contract with the
cumulative change in the fair value of the hedged item, both of
which are based on forward rates. Dell recognizes any
ineffective portion of the hedge, as well as amounts not
included in the assessment of effectiveness, in earnings as a
component of interest and other, net. Hedge ineffectiveness for
cash flow hedges was not material for the three and six months
ended July 30, 2010. During the six months ended
July 30, 2010, Dell did not discontinue any cash flow
hedges that had a material impact on Dells results of
operations. Substantially all forecasted foreign currency
transactions were realized in Dells actual results.
The aggregate unrealized net loss for interest swaps and foreign
currency exchange contracts, recorded as a component of
comprehensive income, for the three and six months ended
July 30, 2010, was $127 million and $114 million,
respectively.
Fair
Value Hedges
Dell enters into interest rate swaps designated as fair value
hedges to manage the exposure of its debt portfolio to interest
rate risk. Dell issues long-term debt in U.S. dollars based on
market conditions at the time of financing. Dell uses interest
rate swaps to modify the market risk exposures in connection
with the debt to achieve primarily U.S. dollar LIBOR-based
floating interest expense. As of July 30, 2010, the
interest rate swaps hedge all interest rate exposure on the 2012
and 2013 Notes. For derivative instruments that are designated
and qualify for hedge accounting, changes in the value of the
derivative and underlying hedged item are recognized in interest
and other, net in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of
Income in the current period.
As of July 30, 2010, and January 29, 2010, the total
notional amount of the interest rate swaps was $1 billion
and $200 million, respectively. During the three and six
months ended July 30, 2010, the fair value change of the
interest rate contracts, and offsetting adjustment to the
carrying amount of the hedged debt resulted in a $4 million
gain and a $5 million gain to interest and other, net,
respectively. During the three and six months ended
July 30, 2010, fair value adjustments increased the
carrying amount of the hedged fixed-rate debt outstanding by
$14 million and $17 million, respectively. Dell did
not have any fair value hedges during the six months ended
July 31, 2009.
17
DELL
INC.
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(unaudited)
Effect of
Derivative Instruments on the Condensed Consolidated Statements
of Financial Position and the Condensed Consolidated Statements
of Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain (Loss)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recognized
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
in Accumulated
|
|
Location of Gain (Loss)
|
|
Gain (Loss)
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives in
|
|
OCI, Net
|
|
Reclassified
|
|
Reclassified
|
|
Location of Gain (Loss)
|
|
Gain (Loss)
|
Cash Flow
|
|
of Tax, on
|
|
from Accumulated
|
|
from Accumulated
|
|
Recognized in Income
|
|
Recognized in
|
Hedging
|
|
Derivatives
|
|
OCI into Income
|
|
OCI into Income
|
|
on Derivative
|
|
Income on Derivative
|
Relationships
|
|
(Effective Portion)
|
|
(Effective Portion)
|
|
(Effective Portion)
|
|
(Ineffective Portion)
|
|
(Ineffective Portion)
|
(in millions)
|
|
For the three months ended July 30, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign exchange
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net revenue
|
|
$
|
77
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
contracts
|
|
$
|
(60
|
)
|
|
Total cost of net revenue
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate contracts
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
Interest and other, net
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
Interest and other, net
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
(59
|
)
|
|
|
|
$
|
67
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the three months ended July 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign exchange
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net revenue
|
|
$
|
(147
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
contracts
|
|
$
|
(289
|
)
|
|
Total cost of net revenue
|
|
|
(23
|
)
|
|
Interest and other, net
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
(289
|
)
|
|
|
|
$
|
(170
|
)
|
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the six months ended July 30, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign exchange
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net revenue
|
|
$
|
123
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
contracts
|
|
$
|
(19
|
)
|
|
Total cost of net revenue
|
|
|
(28
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate contracts
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
Interest and other, net
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
Interest and other, net
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
(18
|
)
|
|
|
|
$
|
95
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the six months ended July 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign exchange
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net revenue
|
|
$
|
74
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
contracts
|
|
$
|
(413
|
)
|
|
Total cost of net revenue
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
Interest and other, net
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
(413
|
)
|
|
|
|
$
|
64
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of July 30, 2010, and January 29, 2010, the total
notional amount of foreign currency option and forward contracts
designated as cash flow hedges was $5.2 billion and
$4.2 billion, respectively. As of July 30, 2010, the
total notional amount of interest rate contracts designated as
cash flow hedges was $507 million. As of July 30,
2010, the total notional amount of interest rate contracts not
designated as hedges was $194 million.
Other
Derivative Instruments
Dell uses forward contracts to hedge monetary assets and
liabilities, primarily receivables and payables, denominated in
a foreign currency. The change in the fair value of these
instruments represents a natural hedge as their gains and losses
offset the changes in the underlying fair value of the monetary
assets and liabilities due to movements in currency exchange
rates. These contracts generally expire in three months or less.
These contracts are considered economic hedges and are not
designated as hedges under derivative instruments and hedging
activities accounting, and therefore, the change in the
instruments fair value is recognized currently in earnings
as a component of interest and other, net. Dell recognized a
gain of $41 million and a loss of $72 million, with
respect to its foreign currency forward contracts, during the
second quarters of Fiscal 2011 and 2010, respectively, and a
$59 million gain and a $26 million loss during the six
months ended July 30, 2010, and July 31, 2009,
respectively. As of July 30, 2010, and January 29,
2010, the total notional amount of other foreign currency
forward contracts not designated as hedges was $396 million
and $20 million, respectively.
18
DELL
INC.
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(unaudited)
Derivative
Instruments Additional Information
Cash flows from derivative instruments are presented in the same
category in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
as the cash flows from the intended hedged items or the economic
hedges.
While Dell has foreign exchange derivative contracts in more
than 20 currencies, the majority of the notional amounts are
denominated in the Euro, British Pound, Japanese Yen, Canadian
Dollar, and Australian Dollar.
Dell presents its foreign exchange derivative instruments on a
net basis in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Financial
Position due to the right of offset by its counterparties under
master netting arrangements. The fair values of foreign exchange
and interest rate derivative instruments presented on a gross
basis for the period are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
July 30, 2010
|
|
|
Other
|
|
Other
|
|
Other
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
Current
|
|
Non-Current
|
|
Current
|
|
Non-Current
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
Assets
|
|
Liabilities
|
|
Liabilities
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
Derivatives Designated as Hedging Instruments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign exchange contracts in an asset position
|
|
$
|
158
|
|
|
$
|
3
|
|
|
$
|
42
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
203
|
|
Foreign exchange contracts in a liability position
|
|
|
(149
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(68
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(218
|
)
|
Interest rate contracts in an asset position
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
Interest rate contracts in a liability position
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net asset (liability)
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
(26
|
)
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives not Designated as Hedging Instruments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign exchange contracts in an asset position
|
|
|
103
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
121
|
|
Foreign exchange contracts in a liability position
|
|
|
(18
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(22
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(40
|
)
|
Interest rate contracts in a liability position
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net asset (liability)
|
|
|
85
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
79
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total derivatives at fair value
|
|
$
|
94
|
|
|
$
|
26
|
|
|
$
|
(30
|
)
|
|
$
|
(7
|
)
|
|
$
|
83
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 29, 2010
|
|
|
Other
|
|
Other
|
|
Other
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
Current
|
|
Non-Current
|
|
Current
|
|
Non-Current
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
Assets
|
|
Liabilities
|
|
Liabilities
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
Derivatives Designated as Hedging Instruments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign exchange contracts in an asset position
|
|
$
|
181
|
|
|
$
|
5
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
186
|
|
Foreign exchange contracts in a liability position
|
|
|
(80
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(89
|
)
|
Interest rate contracts in an asset position
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net asset (liability)
|
|
|
101
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
98
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives not Designated as Hedging Instruments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign exchange contracts in an asset position
|
|
|
63
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
65
|
|
Foreign exchange contracts in a liability position
|
|
|
(74
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(79
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net asset (liability)
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(14
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total derivatives at fair value
|
|
$
|
90
|
|
|
$
|
6
|
|
|
$
|
(12
|
)
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
84
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19
DELL
INC.
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(unaudited)
Dell has reviewed the existence and nature of
credit-risk-related contingent features in derivative trading
agreements with its counterparties. Certain agreements contain
clauses whereby if Dells credit ratings were to fall below
investment grade upon a change of control of Dell,
counterparties would have the right to terminate those
derivative contracts under which Dell is in a net liability
position. As of July 30, 2010, there have been no such
triggering events.
NOTE 8
ACQUISITIONS
Dell completed three acquisitions during the first half of
Fiscal 2011, Kace Networks, Inc. (KACE), Ocarina
Networks Inc. (Ocarina), and Scalent Systems Inc.
(Scalent) for a total purchase consideration of
approximately $275 million in cash. KACE is a systems
management appliance company with solutions tailored to the
requirements of mid-sized businesses. KACE is being integrated
primarily into Dells Small and Medium Business and Public
segments. Ocarina is a provider of de-duplication solutions and
content-aware compression across storage product lines. Scalent
is a provider of scalable and efficient data center
infrastructure software. Ocarina and Scalent will be integrated
into Dells Commercial segments.
Dell has recorded these acquisitions using the acquisition
method of accounting and recorded their respective assets and
liabilities at fair value at the date of acquisition. The
excesses of the purchase prices over the estimated fair values
were recorded as goodwill. Any changes in the estimated fair
values of the net assets recorded for these acquisitions prior
to the finalization of more detailed analyses, but not to exceed
one year from the date of acquisition, will change the amount of
the purchase prices allocable to goodwill. Specifically,
Dells acquisition of Ocarina was completed on
July 29, 2010, one day prior to the end of the second
quarter of Fiscal 2011. As such, the purchase price allocations
for this transaction are preliminary estimates, which are
subject to change within the measurement period. The primary
area of the purchase price allocation not yet finalized relates
to the fair value of intangible assets acquired. Any subsequent
changes to the purchase price allocations that are material to
Dells consolidated financial results will be adjusted
retroactively. Dell recorded approximately $181 million in
goodwill and $110 million in intangible assets related to
these acquisitions. The goodwill related to these acquisitions
is not deductible for tax purposes. In conjunction with these
acquisitions, Dell will incur $45 million in
compensation-related expenses that will be expensed over a
period of one to three years. There was no contingent
consideration related to these acquisitions.
Dell has not presented pro forma results of operations for KACE,
Ocarina, or Scalent because these acquisitions are not material
to Dells consolidated results of operations, financial
position, or cash flows.
NOTE 9
GOODWILL AND INTANGIBLE ASSETS
Goodwill
Goodwill allocated to Dells business segments as of
July 30, 2010, and January 29, 2010, and changes in
the carrying amount of goodwill were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Small and
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large
|
|
|
|
Medium
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Enterprise
|
|
Public
|
|
Business
|
|
Consumer
|
|
Total
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
Balance at January 29, 2010
|
|
$
|
1,361
|
|
|
$
|
2,026
|
|
|
$
|
389
|
|
|
$
|
298
|
|
|
$
|
4,074
|
|
Goodwill acquired during the period
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
|
70
|
|
|
|
53
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
181
|
|
Adjustments
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at July 30, 2010
|
|
$
|
1,420
|
|
|
$
|
2,101
|
|
|
$
|
442
|
|
|
$
|
301
|
|
|
$
|
4,264
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20
DELL
INC.
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(unaudited)
Goodwill and indefinite-lived intangibles are tested annually
during the second fiscal quarter and whenever events or
circumstances indicate impairment may have occurred. If the
carrying amount of goodwill exceeds its fair value, estimated
based on discounted cash flow analyses, an impairment charge
would be recorded. During the second quarter of Fiscal 2011,
Dell evaluated goodwill and indefinite-lived intangibles for
potential triggering events that could indicate impairment.
Based on the results of its evaluation, Dell determined that no
impairment of goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets
existed at July 30, 2010. Dell does not have any
accumulated goodwill impairment charges as of July 30, 2010.
NOTE 10
WARRANTY AND DEFERRED EXTENDED WARRANTY REVENUE
Dell records liabilities for its standard limited warranties at
the time of sale for the estimated costs that may be incurred.
The liability for standard warranties is included in accrued and
other current and other non-current liabilities on Dells
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Financial Position. Revenue
from the sale of extended warranties is recognized over the term
of the contract or when the service is completed, and the costs
associated with these contracts are recognized as incurred.
Deferred extended warranty revenue is included in deferred
services revenue on Dells Condensed Consolidated
Statements of Financial Position. Changes in Dells
liabilities for standard limited warranties and deferred
services revenue related to extended warranties are presented in
the following tables:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
July 30,
|
|
July 31,
|
|
July 30,
|
|
July 31,
|
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
|
Warranty liability
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Warranty liability at beginning of period
|
|
$
|
927
|
|
|
$
|
1,032
|
|
|
$
|
912
|
|
|
$
|
1,035
|
|
Costs accrued for new warranty contracts and changes in
estimates for pre-existing
warranties(a),
(b)
|
|
|
298
|
|
|
|
193
|
|
|
|
608
|
|
|
|
487
|
|
Services obligations honored
|
|
|
(249
|
)
|
|
|
(253
|
)
|
|
|
(544
|
)
|
|
|
(550
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Warranty liability at end of period
|
|
$
|
976
|
|
|
$
|
972
|
|
|
$
|
976
|
|
|
$
|
972
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current portion
|
|
$
|
652
|
|
|
$
|
501
|
|
|
$
|
652
|
|
|
$
|
501
|
|
Non-current portion
|
|
|
324
|
|
|
|
471
|
|
|
|
324
|
|
|
|
471
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Warranty liability at end of period
|
|
$
|
976
|
|
|
$
|
972
|
|
|
$
|
976
|
|
|
$
|
972
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
July 30,
|
|
July 31,
|
|
July 30,
|
|
July 31,
|
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
|
Deferred extended warranty revenue:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred extended warranty revenue at beginning of period
|
|
$
|
5,971
|
|
|
$
|
5,576
|
|
|
$
|
5,910
|
|
|
$
|
5,587
|
|
Revenue deferred for new extended
warranties(b)
|
|
|
973
|
|
|
|
950
|
|
|
|
1,855
|
|
|
|
1,699
|
|
Revenue recognized
|
|
|
(835
|
)
|
|
|
(758
|
)
|
|
|
(1,656
|
)
|
|
|
(1,518
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred extended warranty revenue at end of period
|
|
$
|
6,109
|
|
|
$
|
5,768
|
|
|
$
|
6,109
|
|
|
$
|
5,768
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current portion
|
|
$
|
2,835
|
|
|
$
|
2,730
|
|
|
$
|
2,835
|
|
|
$
|
2,730
|
|
Non-current portion
|
|
|
3,274
|
|
|
|
3,038
|
|
|
|
3,274
|
|
|
|
3,038
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred extended warranty revenue at end of period
|
|
$
|
6,109
|
|
|
$
|
5,768
|
|
|
$
|
6,109
|
|
|
$
|
5,768
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
|
Changes in cost estimates related
to pre-existing warranties are aggregated with accruals for new
standard warranty contracts. Dells warranty liability
process does not differentiate between estimates made for
pre-existing warranties and new warranty obligations.
|
|
|
|
(b)
|
|
Includes the impact of foreign
currency exchange rate fluctuations.
|
21
DELL
INC.
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(unaudited)
NOTE 11
SEVERANCE AND FACILITY ACTIONS
During Fiscal 2010 and Fiscal 2009, Dell completed a series of
individual cost reduction and facility exit activities designed
to enhance operating efficiency and to reduce costs. Dell
continued to incur costs related to these activities during the
first and second quarters of Fiscal 2011. As of July 30,
2010, and January 29, 2010, the accruals related to these
various cost reductions and efficiency actions were
$53 million and $105 million, respectively, and are
included in accrued and other liabilities in the Condensed
Consolidated Statements of Financial Position.
The following table sets forth the activity related to
Dells severance and facility actions liability:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
July 30, 2010
|
|
July 31, 2009
|
|
|
Severance
|
|
Facility
|
|
|
|
Severance
|
|
Facility
|
|
|
|
|
Costs
|
|
Actions
|
|
Total
|
|
Costs
|
|
Actions
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at the beginning of period
|
|
$
|
49
|
|
|
$
|
30
|
|
|
$
|
79
|
|
|
$
|
173
|
|
|
$
|
10
|
|
|
$
|
183
|
|
Severance and facility charges to provision
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
62
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
66
|
|
Cash paid
|
|
|
(32
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
(34
|
)
|
|
|
(65
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(66
|
)
|
Other
adjustments(a)
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at the end of the period
|
|
$
|
26
|
|
|
$
|
27
|
|
|
$
|
53
|
|
|
$
|
174
|
|
|
$
|
14
|
|
|
$
|
188
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
July 30, 2010
|
|
July 31, 2009
|
|
|
Severance
|
|
Facility
|
|
|
|
Severance
|
|
Facility
|
|
|
|
|
Costs
|
|
Actions
|
|
Total
|
|
Costs
|
|
Actions
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at the beginning of period
|
|
$
|
78
|
|
|
$
|
27
|
|
|
$
|
105
|
|
|
$
|
88
|
|
|
$
|
10
|
|
|
$
|
98
|
|
Severance and facility charges to provision
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
|
237
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
241
|
|
Cash paid
|
|
|
(80
|
)
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
(86
|
)
|
|
|
(155
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(156
|
)
|
Other
adjustments(a)
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at the end of the period
|
|
$
|
26
|
|
|
$
|
27
|
|
|
$
|
53
|
|
|
$
|
174
|
|
|
$
|
14
|
|
|
$
|
188
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
|
Other adjustments relate primarily
to foreign currency translation adjustments.
|
Severance and facility action charges for the three and six
months ended July 30, 2010, and July 31, 2009 are
composed of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
July 30,
|
|
July 31,
|
|
July 30,
|
|
July 31,
|
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
|
Severance and facility charges to provision
|
|
$
|
12
|
|
|
$
|
66
|
|
|
$
|
39
|
|
|
$
|
241
|
|
Accelerated depreciation and other facility charges
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total severance and facility action costs
|
|
$
|
24
|
|
|
$
|
87
|
|
|
$
|
81
|
|
|
$
|
272
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22
DELL
INC.
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(unaudited)
Severance and facility action charges are included in cost of
net revenue, selling, general and administrative expenses, and
research, development, and engineering in the Condensed
Consolidated Statements of Income as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
July 30,
|
|
July 31,
|
|
July 30,
|
|
July 31,
|
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
|
Severance and facility action costs:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of revenue
|
|
$
|
14
|
|
|
$
|
14
|
|
|
$
|
43
|
|
|
$
|
79
|
|
Selling, general, and administrative
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
71
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
191
|
|
Research, development, and engineering
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total severance and facility action costs
|
|
$
|
24
|
|
|
$
|
87
|
|
|
$
|
81
|
|
|
$
|
272
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOTE 12
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
Restricted Cash As of July 30,
2010, and January 29, 2010, Dell had restricted cash in the
amount of $171 million and $147 million, respectively,
included in other current assets. These balances primarily
relate to an agreement between DFS and CIT Group Inc., which
requires Dell to maintain escrow cash accounts that are held as
recourse reserves for credit losses, performance fee deposits
related to Dells private label credit card, and deferred
servicing revenue, as well as amounts maintained in escrow
accounts related to our recent acquisitions.
Legal Matters Dell is involved in
various claims, suits, assessments, investigations, and legal
proceedings that arise from
time-to-time
in the ordinary course of its business, including matters
involving consumer, antitrust, tax, intellectual property, and
other issues on a global basis.
The following is a discussion of Dells significant
on-going legal matters and other proceedings:
Investigations and Related Litigation In
August 2005, the SEC initiated an inquiry into certain of
Dells accounting and financial reporting matters and
requested that Dell provide certain documents. The SEC expanded
that inquiry in June 2006 and entered a formal order of
investigation in October 2006. In August 2006, because
of potential issues identified in the course of responding to
the SECs requests for information, Dells Audit
Committee, on the recommendation of management and in
consultation with PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, Dells
independent registered public accounting firm, initiated an
independent investigation into certain accounting and financial
reporting matters, which was completed in the third quarter of
Fiscal 2008. Dell subsequently restated its annual and interim
financial statements for Fiscal 2003, Fiscal 2004, Fiscal 2005,
Fiscal 2006, and the first quarter of Fiscal 2007.
On July 22, 2010, Dell reached a settlement with the SEC
resolving the SECs investigation into Dells
disclosures and alleged omissions prior to Fiscal 2008 regarding
certain aspects of its commercial relationship with Intel
Corporation (Intel) and into separate accounting and
financial reporting matters. The SEC agreed to settlements with
both the company and Michael Dell, who serves as the
companys Chairman and Chief Executive Officer. The company
and Mr. Dell entered into the settlements without admitting
or denying the allegations in the SECs complaint, as is
consistent with standard SEC practice.
Under its settlement, the company consented to a permanent
injunction against future violations of antifraud provisions,
non-scienter (negligence) based fraud provisions and other
non-fraud based provisions related to reporting, the maintenance
of accurate books and records, and internal accounting controls
under Section 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 (the
Securities Act), Sections 10(b), 13(a),
13(b)(2)(A) and 13(b)(2)(B) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 (the
23
DELL
INC.
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(unaudited)
Exchange Act) and
Rules 10b-5,
12b-20, 13a-1 and 13a-13 under the Exchange Act. The company
also agreed to perform certain undertakings, including retaining
an independent consultant, to enhance its disclosure processes,
practices and controls. In addition, the company paid into an
escrow account a civil monetary penalty of $100 million and
discharged the liability during the second quarter of Fiscal
2011.
The SECs allegations with respect to Mr. Dell and his
settlement are limited to the alleged failure to provide
adequate disclosures with respect to the companys
commercial relationship with Intel prior to Fiscal 2008.
Mr. Dells settlement does not involve any of the
separate accounting fraud charges that were settled by the
company. Moreover, Mr. Dells settlement is limited to
claims in which only negligence, and not fraudulent intent, is
required to establish liability, as well as secondary liability
claims for other non-fraud charges.
Under his settlement, Mr. Dell consented to a permanent
injunction against future violations of these negligence-based
provisions and other non-fraud based provisions related to
periodic reporting. Specifically, Mr. Dell consented to be
enjoined from violating Sections 17(a)(2) and (3) of
the Securities Act and
Rule 13a-14
under the Exchange Act and from aiding and abetting violations
of Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act and
Rules 12b-20,
13a-1 and 13a-13 under the Exchange Act. In addition,
Mr. Dell agreed to a civil monetary penalty of
$4 million. The settlement does not include any
restrictions on Mr. Dells continued service as an
officer or director of the company.
The independent directors of the Board of Directors unanimously
have determined that it is in the best interests of Dell and its
stockholders that Mr. Dell continue to serve as the
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the company.
The settlements with the company and Mr. Dell are subject
to approval by the U.S. District Court for the District of
Columbia.
Securities Litigation Four putative
securities class actions filed between September 13, 2006,
and January 31, 2007, in the Western District of Texas,
Austin Division, against Dell and certain of its current and
former directors and officers were consolidated as In re Dell
Securities Litigation, and a lead plaintiff was appointed by the
court. The lead plaintiff asserted claims under
Sections 10(b), 20(a), and 20A of the Exchange Act based on
alleged false and misleading disclosures or omissions regarding
Dells financial statements, governmental investigations,
internal controls, known battery problems and business model,
and based on insiders sales of Dell securities. This
action also included Dells independent registered public
accounting firm, PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, as a defendant. On
October 6, 2008, the court dismissed all of the
plaintiffs claims with prejudice and without leave to
amend. On November 3, 2008, the plaintiff appealed the
dismissal of Dell and the officer defendants to the Fifth
Circuit Court of Appeals. The appeal was fully briefed, and oral
argument on the appeal was heard by the Fifth Circuit Court of
Appeals on September 1, 2009. On November 20, 2009,
the parties to the appeal entered into a written settlement
agreement whereby Dell would pay $40 million to the
proposed class and the plaintiff would dismiss the pending
litigation. The settlement was preliminarily approved by the
District Court on December 21, 2009. The settlement was
subject to certain conditions, including opt-outs from the
proposed class not exceeding a specified percentage and final
approval by the District Court. During the first quarter of
Fiscal 2011, the original opt-out period in the notice approved
by the District Court expired without the specified percentage
being exceeded. The District Court subsequently granted final
approval for the settlement and entered a final judgment on
July 20, 2010. Dell paid $40 million into an escrow
account to satisfy this settlement and discharged the liability
during the second quarter of Fiscal 2011. Certain objectors to
the settlement have filed notices of appeal to the Fifth Circuit
Court of Appeals with regard to approval of the settlement.
While there can be no assurances with respect to litigation, we
believe it is unlikely that the settlement will be overturned on
appeal.
24
DELL
INC.
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(unaudited)
Other Litigation The various legal
proceedings in which Dell is involved include commercial
litigation and a variety of patent suits. In some of these
cases, Dell is the sole defendant. More often, particularly with
patent suits, Dell is one of a number of defendants in the
electronics and technology industries. Dell is actively
defending a number of patent infringement suits, and several
pending claims are in various stages of evaluations. While the
number of patent cases has grown over time, we do not currently
anticipate that any of these matters will have a material impact
on Dells financial condition or results of operation.
Other Matters Dell recently became aware of
instances in which certain peripheral product sales made to U.S.
federal government customers under Dells General Services
Administration (GSA) Schedule 70 Contract were
not compliant with contract requirements implementing the Trade
Agreements Act. Dell is currently investigating the matter and
has self-reported the discovery to GSAs Office of the
Inspector General. Non-compliance could lead to contract claims;
termination for default; civil or criminal penalties; double or
treble damages; and possibly debarment or suspension from sales
to the U.S. federal government. The matter is in the preliminary
stages and Dell cannot currently predict the resolution of this
matter. No liabilities have been recorded as Dell is currently
unable to estimate any potential liability at this time.
While Dell does not expect that the ultimate outcomes in these
proceedings or matters, individually or collectively, will have
a material adverse effect on its business, financial position,
results of operations, or cash flows, the results and timing of
the ultimate resolutions of these various proceedings and
matters are inherently unpredictable. Whether the outcome of any
claim, suit, assessment, investigation, or legal proceeding,
individually or collectively, could have a material effect on
Dells business, financial condition, results of
operations, or cash flows, will depend on a number of variables,
including the nature, timing, and amount of any associated
expenses, amounts paid in settlement, damages or other remedies
or consequences. Dell accrues a liability when it believes that
it is both probable that a liability has been incurred and that
it can reasonably estimate the amount of the loss. Dell reviews
these accruals at least quarterly and adjusts them to reflect
ongoing negotiations, settlements, rulings, advice of legal
counsel, and other relevant information. To the extent new
information is obtained and Dells views on the probable
outcomes of claims, suits, assessments, investigations, or legal
proceedings change, changes in Dells accrued liabilities
would be recorded in the period in which such determination is
made.
NOTE 13
COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
The following table summarizes comprehensive income for the
three and six months ended July 30, 2010, and July 31,
2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
July 30,
|
|
July 31,
|
|
July 30,
|
|
July 31,
|
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
|
Comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
545
|
|
|
$
|
472
|
|
|
$
|
886
|
|
|
$
|
762
|
|
Change related to hedging instruments, net
|
|
|
(127
|
)
|
|
|
(119
|
)
|
|
|
(114
|
)
|
|
|
(477
|
)
|
Change related to marketable securities, net
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
3
|
|
Foreign currency translation adjustments
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
(26
|
)
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
(34
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income
|
|
$
|
409
|
|
|
$
|
330
|
|
|
$
|
796
|
|
|
$
|
254
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25
DELL
INC.
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(unaudited)
NOTE 14
INCOME AND OTHER TAXES
Dells effective income tax rate was 21.7% for the second
quarter of Fiscal 2011 and 22.8% for the six months ended
July 30, 2010, as compared to 25.0% and 26.8% for the three
months and six months ended July 31, 2009, respectively.
The decrease in Dells effective income tax rate for the
three and six months ended July 30, 2010, was primarily due
to the favorable effective settlement of a tax audit in a
foreign jurisdiction, finalization of certain advanced pricing
agreements with foreign jurisdictions, and also Dells
geographical distribution of taxable income. The differences
between the estimated effective income tax rates and the U.S.
federal statutory rate of 35% principally resulted from
Dells geographical distribution of taxable income and
differences between the book and tax treatment of certain items.
The income tax rate for future quarters of Fiscal 2011 will be
impacted by the actual mix of jurisdictions in which income is
generated.
Dell is currently under income tax audits in various
jurisdictions, including the United States. The tax periods open
to examination by the major taxing jurisdictions to which Dell
is subject include fiscal years 1997 through 2010. As a result
of these audits, Dell maintains ongoing discussions and
negotiations relating to tax matters with the taxing authorities
in these various jurisdictions. Dells U.S. federal income
tax returns for fiscal years 2007 through 2009 are under
examination. The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) has
issued a Revenue Agents Report for fiscal years 2004
through 2006 proposing certain assessments primarily related to
transfer pricing matters. Dell disagrees with certain of the
proposed assessments and has contested them through the IRS
administrative procedures. Since March 2010, three meetings
between Dell and the IRS Appeals Division have been held. Dell
anticipates that the appeals process will involve additional
meetings and could take an extended period of time to resolve.
Dell believes that it has provided adequate reserves related to
all matters contained in tax periods open to examination.
However, should Dell experience an unfavorable outcome in the
IRS matter, such an outcome could have a material impact on its
results of operations, financial position, and cash flows.
Although the timing of income tax audit resolutions and
negotiations with taxing authorities is highly uncertain, Dell
does not anticipate a significant change to the total amount of
unrecognized income tax benefits for all matters within the next
12 months.
Dell takes certain non-income tax positions in the jurisdictions
in which it operates and has received certain non-income tax
assessments from various jurisdictions. Dell believes its
positions in these non-income tax litigation matters are
supportable, that a liability is not probable, and that it will
ultimately prevail. In the normal course of business,
Dells positions and conclusions related to its non-income
taxes could be challenged and assessments may be made. To the
extent new information is obtained and Dells views on its
positions, probable outcomes of assessments, or litigation
change, changes in estimates to Dells accrued liabilities
would be recorded in the period in which such determination is
made.
NOTE 15
EARNINGS PER SHARE
Basic earnings per share is based on the weighted-average effect
of all common shares issued and outstanding and is calculated by
dividing net income by the weighted-average shares outstanding
during the period. Diluted earnings per share is calculated by
dividing net income by the weighted-average number of common
shares used in the basic earnings per share calculation plus the
number of common shares that would be issued assuming exercise
or conversion of all potentially dilutive common shares
outstanding. Dell excludes equity instruments from the
calculation of diluted earnings per share if the effect of
including such instruments is anti-dilutive. Accordingly,
certain stock-based incentive awards have been excluded from the
calculation of diluted earnings per share totaling
203 million shares and 232 million shares for the
second quarters of Fiscal 2011 and Fiscal 2010, respectively;
and 203 million and 239 million shares for the six
months ended July 30, 2010, and July 31, 2009,
respectively.
26
DELL
INC.
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(unaudited)
The following table sets forth the computation of basic and
diluted earnings per share for the three and six months ended
July 30, 2010, and July 31, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
July 30,
|
|
July 31,
|
|
July 30,
|
|
July 31,
|
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
|
(in millions, except per share amounts)
|
Numerator:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
545
|
|
|
$
|
472
|
|
|
$
|
886
|
|
|
$
|
762
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average shares outstanding:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
1,952
|
|
|
|
1,955
|
|
|
|
1,956
|
|
|
|
1,952
|
|
Effect of dilutive options, restricted stock units, restricted
stock, and other
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
1,960
|
|
|
|
1,960
|
|
|
|
1,967
|
|
|
|
1,956
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
0.28
|
|
|
$
|
0.24
|
|
|
$
|
0.45
|
|
|
$
|
0.39
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
0.28
|
|
|
$
|
0.24
|
|
|
$
|
0.45
|
|
|
$
|
0.39
|
|
NOTE 16
SEGMENT INFORMATION
Dells four global business segments are Large Enterprise,
Public, Small and Medium Business (SMB), and
Consumer. Large Enterprise includes sales of IT infrastructure
and service solutions to large global and national corporate
customers. Public includes sales to educational institutions,
governments, health care organizations, and law enforcement
agencies, among others. SMB includes sales of complete IT
solutions to small and medium-sized businesses. Consumer
includes sales to individual consumers and retailers around the
world. The business segments disclosed in the accompanying
Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements are based on this
organizational structure and information reviewed by Dells
management to evaluate the business segment results. Dells
measure of segment operating income for management reporting
purposes excludes severance and facility closure expenses, broad
based long-term incentives, amortization of intangibles,
acquisition-related charges, and the settlements for the SEC
investigation as well as the securities litigation class action
lawsuit that were incurred during the first quarter of Fiscal
2011.
27
DELL
INC.
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(unaudited)
The following table presents net revenue by Dells
reportable global segments as well as a reconciliation of
consolidated segment operating income to Dells
consolidated operating income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
July 30,
|
|
July 31,
|
|
July 30,
|
|
July 31,
|
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
|
Net revenue:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large Enterprise
|
|
$
|
4,549
|
|
|
$
|
3,285
|
|
|
$
|
8,795
|
|
|
$
|
6,685
|
|
Public
|
|
|
4,580
|
|
|
|
3,798
|
|
|
|
8,436
|
|
|
|
6,969
|
|
Small and Medium Business
|
|
|
3,535
|
|
|
|
2,820
|
|
|
|
7,059
|
|
|
|
5,787
|
|
Consumer
|
|
|
2,870
|
|
|
|
2,861
|
|
|
|
6,118
|
|
|
|
5,665
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenue
|
|
$
|
15,534
|
|
|
$
|
12,764
|
|
|
$
|
30,408
|
|
|
$
|
25,106
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated operating income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large Enterprise
|
|
$
|
288
|
|
|
$
|
172
|
|
|
$
|
571
|
|
|
$
|
364
|
|
Public
|
|
|
369
|
|
|
|
383
|
|
|
|
667
|
|
|
|
676
|
|
Small and Medium Business
|
|
|
323
|
|
|
|
246
|
|
|
|
636
|
|
|
|
476
|
|
Consumer
|
|
|
(21
|
)
|
|
|
89
|
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
88
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated segment operating income
|
|
|
959
|
|
|
|
890
|
|
|
|
1,870
|
|
|
|
1,604
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Severance and facility actions
|
|
|
(24
|
)
|
|
|
(87
|
)
|
|
|
(81
|
)
|
|
|
(272
|
)
|
Broad based long-term
incentives(a)
|
|
|
(87
|
)
|
|
|
(92
|
)
|
|
|
(174
|
)
|
|
|
(168
|
)
|
Amortization of intangible assets
|
|
|
(87
|
)
|
|
|
(40
|
)
|
|
|
(175
|
)
|
|
|
(79
|
)
|
Acquisition-related
costs(b)
|
|
|
(16
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(36
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
Other(c)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(140
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated operating income
|
|
$
|
745
|
|
|
$
|
671
|
|
|
$
|
1,264
|
|
|
$
|
1,085
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
|
Broad based long-term incentives
include stock-based compensation and other long-term incentives
that are not allocated to Dells global segments.
|
|
|
|
(b)
|
|
Acquisition-related charges consist
primarily of retention payments, integration costs, and
consulting fees.
|
|
|
|
(c)
|
|
Other includes the
$100 million settlement for the SEC investigation and a
$40 million settlement for a securities litigation lawsuit.
|
NOTE 17
SUBSEQUENT EVENT
In August 2010, Dell made an offer to acquire 3Par Inc.
(3PAR), a global provider of storage solutions
optimized for the cloud environment. The acquisition of 3PAR is
anticipated to enhance Dells storage portfolio and provide
Dells customers with solutions at every storage tier.
Subsequent to Dells offer to acquire, 3PAR received a
competing offer and Dell responded by increasing its original
offer to approximately $1.6 billion, net of 3PARs
cash. Dell cannot predict the outcome of this matter at this
time.
28
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENTS
DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF
OPERATIONS
SPECIAL NOTE: All percentage amounts and ratios
were calculated using the underlying data in thousands. Our
fiscal year is the 52 or 53 week period ending on the
Friday nearest January 31. Unless the context indicates
otherwise, references in this managements discussion and
analysis to we, us, our and
Dell mean Dell Inc. and our consolidated
subsidiaries. This managements discussion and analysis
should be read in conjunction with our Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended January 29, 2010, and the
consolidated financial statements and related notes included in
that report.
OVERVIEW
We are a leading integrated technology solutions provider in the
IT industry. We built our reputation through listening to
customers and developing solutions that meet customer needs. We
are focused on providing long-term value creation through the
delivery of customized solutions that make technology more
efficient, more accessible, and easy to use. Customer needs are
increasingly being defined by how customers use technology
rather than where they use it, which is why our businesses are
globally organized. Our four global business segments are Large
Enterprise, Public, Small and Medium Business (SMB),
and Consumer. We also refer to our Large Enterprise, Public, and
SMB segments as Commercial. Our globally organized
business units reflect the impact of globalization on our
customer base.
Our enterprise products include servers and networking, and
storage products. Client products include mobility and desktop
PC products. Our services include a broad range of configurable
IT and business services, including infrastructure technology,
consulting and applications, and business process services.
Our recent acquisition of Kace Networks, Inc, Scalent Systems
Inc., and Ocarina Networks Inc., and our continued integration
of Perot Systems Corporation (Perot Systems) have
enabled us to expand our portfolio of enterprise solutions
offerings. The comparability of our results of operations for
the second quarter and first six months of Fiscal 2011 compared
with the same periods in Fiscal 2010 are impacted by the
acquisitions we have made since the second quarter of Fiscal
2010, primarily Perot Systems. See our Services discussion under
Revenue by Product and Services Categories below for
a comparison of Dells services revenue for the first half
of Fiscal 2011 to the prior years results of Dell services
and Perot Systems.
29
CONSOLIDATED
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The following table summarizes the results of our operations for
the three and six months ended July 30, 2010, and
July 31, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
July 30, 2010
|
|
|
|
July 31, 2009
|
|
July 30, 2010
|
|
|
|
July 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
% of
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
% of
|
|
|
|
% of
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
% of
|
|
|
Dollars
|
|
Revenue
|
|
Change
|
|
Dollars
|
|
Revenue
|
|
Dollars
|
|
Revenue
|
|
Change
|
|
Dollars
|
|
Revenue
|
|
|
(in millions, except per share amounts and percentages)
|
Net revenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Products
|
|
$
|
12,645
|
|
|
|
81.4%
|
|
|
|
19%
|
|
|
$
|
10,623
|
|
|
|
83.2%
|
|
|
$
|
24,731
|
|
|
|
81.3%
|
|
|
|
19%
|
|
|
$
|
20,855
|
|
|
|
83.1%
|
|
Services, including software related
|
|
|
2,889
|
|
|
|
18.6%
|
|
|
|
35%
|
|
|
|
2,141
|
|
|
|
16.8%
|
|
|
|
5,677
|
|
|
|
18.7%
|
|
|
|
34%
|
|
|
|
4,251
|
|
|
|
16.9%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net revenue
|
|
$
|
15,534
|
|
|
|
100.0%
|
|
|
|
22%
|
|
|
$
|
12,764
|
|
|
|
100.0%
|
|
|
$
|
30,408
|
|
|
|
100.0%
|
|
|
|
21%
|
|
|
$
|
25,106
|
|
|
|
100.0%
|
|
Gross margin
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Products
|
|
$
|
1,714
|
|
|
|
13.6%
|
|
|
|
4%
|
|
|
$
|
1,645
|
|
|
|
15.5%
|
|
|
$
|
3,415
|
|
|
|
13.8%
|
|
|
|
10%
|
|
|
$
|
3,091
|
|
|
|
14.8%
|
|
Services, including software related
|
|
|
872
|
|
|
|
30.2%
|
|
|
|
17%
|
|
|
|
746
|
|
|
|
34.8%
|
|
|
|
1,687
|
|
|
|
29.7%
|
|
|
|
15%
|
|
|
|
1,468
|
|
|
|
34.5%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total gross margin
|
|
$
|
2,586
|
|
|
|
16.6%
|
|
|
|
8%
|
|
|
$
|
2,391
|
|
|
|
18.7%
|
|
|
$
|
5,102
|
|
|
|
16.8%
|
|
|
|
12%
|
|
|
$
|
4,559
|
|
|
|
18.2%
|
|
Operating expenses
|
|
$
|
1,841
|
|
|
|
11.8%
|
|
|
|
7%
|
|
|
$
|
1,720
|
|
|
|
13.5%
|
|
|
$
|
3,838
|
|
|
|
12.6%
|
|
|
|
10%
|
|
|
$
|
3,474
|
|
|
|
13.8%
|
|
Operating income
|
|
$
|
745
|
|
|
|
4.8%
|
|
|
|
11%
|
|
|
$
|
671
|
|
|
|
5.2%
|
|
|
$
|
1,264
|
|
|
|
4.2%
|
|
|
|
16%
|
|
|
$
|
1,085
|
|
|
|
4.3%
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
545
|
|
|
|
3.5%
|
|
|
|
16%
|
|
|
$
|
472
|
|
|
|
3.7%
|
|
|
$
|
886
|
|
|
|
2.9%
|
|
|
|
16%
|
|
|
$
|
762
|
|
|
|
3.0%
|
|
Earnings per share diluted
|
|
$
|
0.28
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
17%
|
|
|
$
|
0.24
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
$
|
0.45
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
15%
|
|
|
$
|
0.39
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
In the second quarter of Fiscal 2011, our total net revenue
increased 22%
year-over-year
with increases across all our Commercial segments, while
Consumer revenue remained flat. Revenue from our Commercial
segments increased 28%
year-over-year,
with Large Enterprise and SMB leading the increase. Our
Commercial segments generated approximately 82% of our total net
revenue during the second quarter of Fiscal 2011. We continue to
see indications of strengthening demand primarily from our Large
Enterprise and SMB customers due to the corporate refresh cycle
that is being experienced across the industry, while demand from
our Public and Consumer customers is showing signs of softening.
For the first half of Fiscal 2011, our total net revenue
increased 21%, with revenue from our Commercial and Consumer
segments increasing 25% and 8%, respectively,
year-over-year
for the same period.
We will continue to focus our efforts on providing IT solutions
to our customers in areas such as servers and networking,
storage, and services. The revenue generated from these
categories of our Commercial segments, including the
contributions from Perot Systems, grew a combined 43% and 42%
year-over-year,
during the second quarter and first half of Fiscal 2011,
respectively. We believe these solutions are customized to the
needs of users, easy to use, and affordable. We will also seek
to improve our client product business by simplifying our
product offerings, developing next generation capabilities, and
enhancing the online buying experience for our customers. Our
cost reduction activities over the past several quarters are
improving our profitability and operating leverage as revenue
growth returns. We expect that the benefits of our strategy will
carry throughout Fiscal 2011.
Revenue
Product Revenue Product revenue
increased
year-over-year
by 19% for the second quarter and first half of Fiscal 2011. Our
product revenue performance was primarily attributable to
improved customer demand as result of increased global IT
spending from our Commercial customers across all product
categories.
Services Revenue, including software
related Services revenue, including software
related increased
year-over-year
by 35% for the second quarter of Fiscal 2011 and 34% for the
first half of Fiscal 2011. Our services revenue performance was
attributable to a 57%
year-over-year
increase in services revenue and an increase of 6% in software
related services revenue during the second quarter of Fiscal
2011. For the first half of Fiscal 2011, services and software
related services revenue increased 55% and 4%, respectively. The
increase in services revenue was primarily due to our
acquisition of Perot Systems, which was integrated into our
Public and Large Enterprise segments.
30
Revenue from the U.S. increased 17% and 19% during the second
quarter and first half of Fiscal 2011, respectively, over the
same periods last year. Revenue from outside the U.S.
represented approximately 47% of total net revenue for the
second quarter and first half of Fiscal 2011, and grew 28% and
24%
year-over-year
for the second quarter and first half of Fiscal 2011,
respectively. Revenue from Brazil, Russia, India, and China
(BRIC) increased 52% and 56%
year-over-year,
on a combined basis, for the second quarter and first half of
Fiscal 2011, respectively. Revenue from BRIC combined has been
increasing sequentially since the fourth quarter of Fiscal 2009
and represented 12.0% of our total net revenue for the first
half of Fiscal 2011 compared to 9.4% in the prior year. We are
continuing to expand into these and other emerging countries
that represent the vast majority of the worlds population,
tailor solutions to meet specific regional needs, and enhance
relationships to provide customer choice and flexibility.
We manage our business on a U.S. dollar basis and utilize a
comprehensive hedging strategy intended to mitigate the impact
of foreign currency volatility over time. As a result of our
hedging programs, the impact of currency movements was not
material to our total net revenue for the second quarter and
first half of Fiscal 2011.
Gross
Margin
Products During the second quarter and
first half of Fiscal 2011, products gross margin increased in
absolute dollars
year-over-year,
while gross margin percentage decreased 190 basis points and 100
basis points, respectively. The decrease in gross margin
percentage was primarily a result of component cost pressures
that we were not able to completely offset through pricing
actions. Our client products were particularly impacted by this
trend. Late in the second quarter of Fiscal 2011, we observed
indications of moderating component cost trends, which,
depending on the pricing environment, may provide for gross
margin improvement in the second half of Fiscal 2011.
Services, including software related
During the second quarter and first half of Fiscal 2011, our
services gross margin increased in absolute dollars compared to
the prior year, though our gross margin percentage decreased.
The decrease in gross margin percentage for services, including
software related, was primarily due to a higher mix of
stand-alone services. Our services, including software related
gross margin rate is driven by our extended warranty sales, the
total effect of which was offset by lower margin categories such
as software, consulting, and managed services. Our extended
warranty services are more profitable because we sell extended
warranty offerings directly to customers instead of selling
through a distribution channel. We have a service support
structure that allows us to favorably manage our fixed costs.
We will continue to invest in initiatives that align our new and
existing products and services with customers needs,
particularly for enterprise products and solutions. As we shift
our focus more to enterprise solutions and services, we believe
the improved mix of higher margin sales will positively impact
our gross margins over time.
Severance
and Facility Actions
Due to our continued migration towards a more variable cost
manufacturing model, we continue to incur certain severance and
facility action costs, though these costs have decreased from
the prior year. During the second quarter and first half of
Fiscal 2011, the cost of these actions was $24 million and
$81 million, respectively, of which $14 million and
$43 million, respectively, affected gross margin. For the
second quarter and first six months of Fiscal 2010, the cost of
these actions was $87 million and $272 million,
respectively, of which $14 million and $79 million,
respectively, affected gross margin. While we believe that we
have completed a significant portion of our manufacturing
transformation, we expect to implement additional cost reduction
measures depending on a number of factors, including end-user
demand and the continued simplification of our supply and
logistics chain. Additional cost reduction measures may include
selected headcount reductions, as well as other cost reduction
programs. See Note 11 of the Notes to Condensed
Consolidated Financial Statements included in
Part I Item 1 Financial
Statements for additional information on severance and
facility action costs.
Vendor
Rebate Programs
Our gross margin is affected by our ability to achieve favorable
pricing with our vendors and contract manufacturers, including
through our negotiation of a variety of vendor rebate programs
to achieve lower net
31
costs for the various components we include in our products.
Under these programs, vendors provide us with rebates or other
discounts from the list prices for the components, which are
generally elements of their pricing strategy. Vendor rebate
programs are only one element of the costs we negotiate for our
product components. We account for these rebates and other
discounts as a reduction in cost of net revenue. Our total net
cost includes supplier list prices as well as the vendor rebates
and other discounts. We manage our costs on a total net cost
basis.
The terms and conditions of our vendor rebate programs are
largely based on product volumes and are generally not long-term
in nature, but instead are typically negotiated at the beginning
of each quarter. Because of the fluid nature of these ongoing
negotiations, which reflect changes in the competitive
environment, the timing and amount of rebates and other
discounts we receive under the programs may vary from period to
period. Since we manage our component costs on a total net cost
basis, any fluctuations in the timing and amount of rebates and
other discounts we receive from vendors may not necessarily
result in material changes to our gross margin. We monitor our
component costs and seek to address the effects of any changes
to terms that might arise under our vendor rebate programs, to
minimize the potential impact on our business. Our gross margin
was not materially affected by any changes to the terms of our
vendor rebate programs for the second quarter or first six
months of Fiscal 2011, as the amounts we received under these
programs were generally stable relative to our aggregate product
cost.
Operating
Expenses
Our cost reduction activities over the past several quarters are
improving operating leverage as revenue growth is returning. Our
operating expenses as a percentage of net revenue declined 170
basis points and 120 basis points
year-over-year
during the second quarter and first six months of Fiscal 2011,
respectively. The following table summarizes our operating
expenses for the three and six months ended July 30, 2010,
and July 31, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
July 30, 2010
|
|
|
|
July 31, 2009
|
|
July 30, 2010
|
|
|
|
July 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
% of
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
% of
|
|
|
|
% of
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
% of
|
|
|
Dollars
|
|
Revenue
|
|
Change
|
|
Dollars
|
|
Revenue
|
|
Dollars
|
|
Revenue
|
|
Change
|
|
Dollars
|
|
Revenue
|
|
|
(in millions, except percentages)
|
Operating expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, general, and administrative
|
|
$
|
1,679
|
|
|
|
10.8%
|
|
|
|
7%
|
|
|
$
|
1,571
|
|
|
|
12.3%
|
|
|
$
|
3,509
|
|
|
|
11.5%
|
|
|
|
10%
|
|
|
$
|
3,184
|
|
|
|
12.7%
|
|
Research, development, and engineering
|
|
|
162
|
|
|
|
1.0%
|
|
|
|
9%
|
|
|
|
149
|
|
|
|
1.2%
|
|
|
|
329
|
|
|
|
1.1%
|
|
|
|
13%
|
|
|
|
290
|
|
|
|
1.1%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses
|
|
$
|
1,841
|
|
|
|
11.8%
|
|
|
|
7%
|
|
|
$
|
1,720
|
|
|
|
13.5%
|
|
|
$
|
3,838
|
|
|
|
12.6%
|
|
|
|
10%
|
|
|
$
|
3,474
|
|
|
|
13.8%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, General, and Administrative
During the second quarter of Fiscal 2011, selling, general and
administrative (SG&A) expenses increased
year-over-year,
while SG&A expenses as a percentage of net revenue
decreased. The increase in SG&A expenses was primarily
attributable to increases in compensation-related expenses of
approximately $116 million due to an increase in headcount
resulting from our acquisitions. SG&A expenses related to
headcount and infrastructure reductions through our on-going
cost optimization efforts were $9 million for the second
quarter of Fiscal 2011 compared to $71 million for the same
period in the prior year. During the second quarter of Fiscal
2011, we also had a
year-over-year
increase of $30 million related to advertising and
promotion costs. SG&A expenses for the second quarter of
Fiscal 2011 also included approximately $15 million of
costs related to our acquisitions, which includes costs incurred
for recent acquisitions as well as integrations costs related to
Perot Systems.
|
During the first six months of Fiscal 2011, SG&A expenses
increased
year-over-year,
while SG&A expenses as a percentage of net revenue
decreased. The increase in SG&A expenses was primarily
attributable to increases in compensation-related expenses of
approximately $224 million due to an increase in headcount
resulting from our acquisitions. SG&A expenses related to
headcount and infrastructure reductions through our on-going
cost optimization efforts were $34 million for the first
half of Fiscal 2011 compared to $191 million for the same
period in the prior year. SG&A expenses for the first half
of Fiscal 2011 also included approximately $34 million in
acquisition-related charges. In addition, during the first
quarter of Fiscal 2011, Dell recorded a $100 million charge
for our settlement of the SEC investigation and a
$40 million charge for a securities litigation class action
lawsuit that was filed against Dell during Fiscal 2007. See
Note 12 to Notes to Condensed
32
Consolidated Financial Statements included in
Part I Item 1 Financial
Statements for more information on legal matters.
|
|
|
Research, Development, and Engineering
During the second quarter and first six months of Fiscal 2011,
research, development and engineering (RD&E)
expenses remained approximately 1% of revenue, consistent with
the prior year. We manage our research, development, and
engineering spending by targeting those innovations and products
that we believe are most valuable to our customers and by
relying upon the capabilities of our strategic relationships. We
will continue to invest in RD&E activities to support our
growth and to provide for new, competitive products.
|
Operating
and Net Income
|
|
|
Operating Income During the second
quarter and first half of Fiscal 2011, operating income
increased 11% and 16%, respectively. The increases were
primarily due to increases in gross margin dollars of 8% and 12%
for the second quarter and first half of Fiscal 2011,
respectively. A 7% and 10%
year-over-year
increase in operating expenses during the second quarter and
first half of Fiscal 2011, respectively, negatively impacted
operating income, while operating expenses as a percentage of
net revenue decreased during the same periods.
|
|
|
Net Income For the second quarter and
first half of Fiscal 2011, net income increased
year-over-year
for both periods by 16% to $545 million and
$886 million, respectively. Net income was positively
impacted by increases in operating income and a lower effective
tax rate for the second quarter and first half of Fiscal 2011.
The lower effective tax rates were offset by higher interest
expenses. See Income and Other Taxes and
Interest and Other, net sections below for
discussions of our effective tax rates and interest and other,
net.
|
Segment
Discussion
Our four global business segments are Large Enterprise, Public,
Small and Medium Business, and Consumer.
Severance and facility action expenses, broad based long-term
incentive expenses, amortization of purchased intangible assets
costs, acquisition-related expenses, and charges related to our
settlement of the SEC investigation as well as a securities
litigation class action lawsuit that were incurred during the
first quarter of Fiscal 2011, are not allocated to the reporting
segments as management does not believe that these items are
reflective of the underlying operating performance of the
reporting segments. These costs totaled $214 million and
$606 million for the second quarter and first half of
Fiscal 2011, respectively. For the second quarter and first half
of Fiscal 2010, these costs totaled $219 million and
$519 million, respectively. See Note 16 of Notes to
Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements included in
Part I Item 1
Financial Statements for additional
information and reconciliation of segment revenue and operating
income to consolidated revenue and operating income.
The following table summarizes our revenue and operating income
by reportable global segments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
July 30, 2010
|
|
|
|
July 31, 2009
|
|
July 30, 2010
|
|
|
|
July 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
% of
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
% of
|
|
|
|
% of
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
% of
|
|
|
Dollars
|
|
Revenue(a)
|
|
Change
|
|
Dollars
|
|
Revenue(a)
|
|
Dollars
|
|
Revenue(a)
|
|
Change
|
|
Dollars
|
|
Revenue(a)
|
|
|
(in millions, except percentages)
|
Large Enterprise
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenue
|
|
$
|
4,549
|
|
|
|
29%
|
|
|
|
38%
|
|
|
$
|
3,285
|
|
|
|
26%
|
|
|
$
|
8,795
|
|
|
|
29%
|
|
|
|
32%
|
|
|
$
|
6,685
|
|
|
|
27%
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
288
|
|
|
|
6%
|
|
|
|
68%
|
|
|
|
172
|
|
|
|
5%
|
|
|
|
571
|
|
|
|
7%
|
|
|
|
57%
|
|
|
|
364
|
|
|
|
5%
|
|
Public
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenue
|
|
$
|
4,580
|
|
|
|
30%
|
|
|
|
21%
|
|
|
$
|
3,798
|
|
|
|
30%
|
|
|
$
|
8,436
|
|
|
|
28%
|
|
|
|
21%
|
|
|
$
|
6,969
|
|
|
|
28%
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
369
|
|
|
|
8%
|
|
|
|
(4%
|
)
|
|
|
383
|
|
|
|
10%
|
|
|
|
667
|
|
|
|
8%
|
|
|
|
(1%
|
)
|
|
|
676
|
|
|
|
10%
|
|
Small and Medium Business
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenue
|
|
$
|
3,535
|
|
|
|
23%
|
|
|
|
25%
|
|
|
$
|
2,820
|
|
|
|
22%
|
|
|
$
|
7,059
|
|
|
|
23%
|
|
|
|
22%
|
|
|
$
|
5,787
|
|
|
|
23%
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
323
|
|
|
|
9%
|
|
|
|
32%
|
|
|
|
246
|
|
|
|
9%
|
|
|
|
636
|
|
|
|
9%
|
|
|
|
34%
|
|
|
|
476
|
|
|
|
8%
|
|
Consumer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenue
|
|
$
|
2,870
|
|
|
|
18%
|
|
|
|
0%
|
|
|
$
|
2,861
|
|
|
|
22%
|
|
|
$
|
6,118
|
|
|
|
20%
|
|
|
|
8%
|
|
|
$
|
5,665
|
|
|
|
22%
|
|
Operating income (loss)
|
|
|
(21
|
)
|
|
|
(1%
|
)
|
|
|
(124%
|
)
|
|
|
89
|
|
|
|
3%
|
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
0%
|
|
|
|
(105%
|
)
|
|
|
88
|
|
|
|
2%
|
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
|
Operating income percentage of
revenue is stated in relation to the respective segment.
|
33
|
|
|
Large Enterprise The
year-over-year
increase in Large Enterprises revenue for the second
quarter of Fiscal 2010 was mainly attributable to improved
demand. Many of our customers who delayed or canceled IT
projects as a result of the economic slowdown have resumed IT
spending. Large Enterprise experienced
year-over-year
increases in revenue across all product lines during the second
quarter of Fiscal 2011. Revenue from servers and networking and
services increased 54% and 56%, respectively. The increase in
services revenue was largely due to the integration of Perot
Systems. Demand for our client products also increased, with
mobility and desktop PC revenue increasing 51% and 35%
year-over-year,
respectively. During the second quarter of Fiscal 2011, Large
Enterprises revenue increased
year-over-year
across all regions.
|
During the first half of Fiscal 2011, all product and services
categories experienced increases in revenue. Revenue from
servers and networking increased 57%
year-over-year,
and services increased 50% primarily as result of the
integration of Perot Systems. Revenue from mobility and desktop
PCs increased 31% and 28%
year-over-year,
respectively.
During the second quarter and first half of Fiscal 2011,
operating income percentage increased 110 basis points
year-over-year
to 6.3% and 6.5%, respectively, mostly driven by tighter
spending controls and revenue increases that resulted in
operating expenses decreasing as a percentage of net revenue,
offset by a decrease in gross margin percentage, resulting from
component cost pressures and the product pricing environment.
|
|
|
Public During the second quarter of
Fiscal 2011, Public experienced a
year-over-year
increase in revenue across all product and service categories.
Services contributed the largest increase, with a 116% increase
in revenue over the prior year. The increase in services revenue
was primarily a result of our integration of Perot Systems.
Revenue from servers and networking and desktop PCs had double
digit
year-over-year
increases of 12% and 10%, respectively. Publics revenue
grew during the second quarter of Fiscal 2011 across all
regions, though demand from U.S. state and local governments and
our Europe-based Public customers was muted due to fiscal budget
constraints.
|
Publics
year-over-year
increase in revenue across all product and service categories
for the first half of Fiscal 2011 was consistent with the second
quarter of Fiscal 2011. Revenue from services increased 119% as
a result of our integration of Perot, while revenue from servers
and networking increased 14%
year-over-year.
For the second quarter and first half of Fiscal 2011, operating
income percentage decreased 210 basis points and 180 basis
points, respectively, from the same periods last year to 8.0%
and 7.9%, respectively. Operating income percentage was
negatively impacted by a
year-over-year
decrease in gross margin percentage as our services portfolio
mix shifted to lower margin categories due to the integration of
Perot Systems. Operating expenses as a percentage of net revenue
for the second quarter and first half of Fiscal 2011 were
relatively consistent with the same periods of Fiscal 2010.
|
|
|
Small and Medium Business During the
second quarter of Fiscal 2011, SMB experienced a
year-over-year
increase in revenue with double digit percentage increases
across all product categories. The revenue growth was led by 32%
and 29% increases in mobility and desktop PCs revenue,
respectively, and a 28% increase in servers and networking
revenue. The improved demand environment was a major contributor
to the increase in revenue for SMB. SMB revenue experienced
year-over-year
growth across all regions during the second quarter of Fiscal
2011, while our BRIC revenue grew 63%
year-over-year.
|
SMB revenue also increased for all product and service
categories for the first half of Fiscal 2011. Revenue from
desktop PCs and mobility products had the greatest dollar
increases, with each increasing 25%
year-over-year.
Revenue from servers and networking and software and peripherals
increased 28% and 16%, respectively.
For the second quarter and first half of Fiscal 2011, operating
income percentage increased 40 basis points and 80 basis points,
respectively,
year-over-year
to 9.1% and 9.0%, respectively. The increase in operating income
percentage for the second quarter and first half of Fiscal 2011
was largely due to improved demand and tighter spending controls
that resulted in operating expenses decreasing as a percentage
of revenue, offset by a decrease in gross margin percentage due
to the higher mix of client products sold during the periods.
34
|
|
|
Consumer Consumers revenue
remained flat
year-over-year
during the second quarter of Fiscal 201l as all relevant product
and service categories, except for Consumer mobility products,
experienced
year-over-year
declines. Consumer mobility revenue increased by 9%
year-over-year
while revenue from desktop PCs decreased 8% during the second
quarter of Fiscal 2011. The continuing shift in consumer
preference from desktops to notebooks has contributed to
continued revenue mix shifts to mobility products. Partially
offsetting the increase in mobility products revenue for the
second quarter of Fiscal 2011 was a decrease of 21% in software
and peripherals revenue, which was largely due to a
$53 million transaction in the second quarter of Fiscal
2010, in which a vendor purchased our contractual right to share
in future revenues from product renewals sold by the vendor. We
did not have a similar transaction during the second quarter of
Fiscal 2011. At a country level, our U.S. revenue decreased 15%
year-over-year
for the second quarter of Fiscal 2011 due to softer demand,
while our
non-U.S.
regions experienced 21% revenue growth. Revenue from BRIC grew
68%
year-over-year
for the second quarter of Fiscal 2011. We expanded our global
retail presence over the prior year and now reach approximately
66,000 retail locations worldwide, compared to 40,000 at the end
of the second quarter of Fiscal 2010. Our global retail
expansion has increased our customer base.
|
During the first half of Fiscal 2011, Consumers revenue
grew 8% largely due to an increase in mobility revenue of 17%,
which was offset in part by decreases in revenue from all other
product and services categories. At a country level, our U.S.
revenue decreased 7% for the first half of Fiscal 2011, while
our BRIC revenue grew 80%.
For the second quarter and first half of Fiscal 2011,
Consumers operating income percentage decreased
approximately 380 and 170 basis points, respectively,
year-over-year
to negative 0.7% and negative 0.1%,. The decrease in operating
income percentage was largely attributable to decreases in gross
margin percentage. Consumer gross margin decreased due to
fluctuations in component prices that were not offset by selling
prices, which resulted in decreased gross margins for all our
Consumer product categories. Operating expenses as a percentage
of revenue decreased during the second quarter and first half of
Fiscal 2011 as compared to the same periods in Fiscal 2010, even
though operating expenses remained relatively flat
year-over-year.
During the first quarter of Fiscal 2011, we combined Consumer
and SMB under a single leadership team to reduce overall costs,
though we are continuing to manage and report the two segments
separately. As we work to improve profitability, we continue to
monetize aspects of the consumer business model with
arrangements with vendors and suppliers, such as revenue sharing
arrangements, which we believe will continue to contribute to
and improve Consumers operating income over time, although
such impacts may not be linear. We expect the operating income
percentage for Consumer to improve to the 1% to 2% range in the
near term, as we balance profitability with growth.
35
Revenue
by Product and Services Categories
We design, develop, manufacture, market, sell, and support a
wide range of products that in many cases are customized to
individual customer requirements. Our products are organized
between enterprise and client categories. Our enterprise
products include servers and networking, and storage products.
Client products include mobility and desktop PC products. Our
services include a broad range of configurable IT and business
services, including infrastructure technology, consulting and
applications, and business process services.
The following table summarizes our net revenue by product and
service categories for the three and six months ended
July 30, 2010, and July 31, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
July 30, 2010
|
|
|
|
July 31, 2009
|
|
July 30, 2010
|
|
|
|
July 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
% of
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
% of
|
|
|
|
% of
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
% of
|
|
|
Dollars
|
|
Revenue
|
|
Change
|
|
Dollars
|
|
Revenue
|
|
Dollars
|
|
Revenue
|
|
Change
|
|
Dollars
|
|
Revenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions, except percentages)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenue:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Enterprise products:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Servers and networking
|
|
$
|
1,890
|
|
|
|
12%
|
|
|
|
35%
|
|
|
$
|
1,403
|
|
|
|
11%
|
|
|
$
|
3,675
|
|
|
|
12%
|
|
|
|
37%
|
|
|
$
|
2,689
|
|
|
|
11%
|
|
Storage
|
|
|
624
|
|
|
|
4%
|
|
|
|
13%
|
|
|
|
551
|
|
|
|
4%
|
|
|
|
1,178
|
|
|
|
4%
|
|
|
|
9%
|
|
|
|
1,085
|
|
|
|
4%
|
|
Services
|
|
|
1,915
|
|
|
|
12%
|
|
|
|
57%
|
|
|
|
1,218
|
|
|
|
10%
|
|
|
|
3,806
|
|
|
|
12%
|
|
|
|
55%
|
|
|
|
2,456
|
|
|
|
10%
|
|
Software and peripherals
|
|
|
2,535
|
|
|
|
17%
|
|
|
|
6%
|
|
|
|
2,382
|
|
|
|
19%
|
|
|
|
5,031
|
|
|
|
17%
|
|
|
|
9%
|
|
|
|
4,628
|
|
|
|
18%
|
|
Client products:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mobility
|
|
|
4,700
|
|
|
|
30%
|
|
|
|
21%
|
|
|
|
3,891
|
|
|
|
30%
|
|
|
|
9,263
|
|
|
|
30%
|
|
|
|
19%
|
|
|
|
7,766
|
|
|
|
31%
|
|
Desktop PCs
|
|
|
3,870
|
|
|
|
25%
|
|
|
|
17%
|
|
|
|
3,319
|
|
|
|
26%
|
|
|
|
7,455
|
|
|
|
25%
|
|
|
|
15%
|
|
|
|
6,482
|
|
|
|
26%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenue
|
|
$
|
15,534
|
|
|
|
100%
|
|
|
|
22%
|
|
|
$
|
12,764
|
|
|
|
100%
|
|
|
$
|
30,408
|
|
|
|
100%
|
|
|
|
21%
|
|
|
$
|
25,106
|
|
|
|
100%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Enterprise
Solutions
Servers and Networking The increases in our
server and networking revenue during the second quarter and
first of half of Fiscal 2011 as compared to the same periods of
Fiscal 2010 were due to demand improvements across all
Commercial segments and all regions. During the second quarter
and first six months of Fiscal 2011, unit shipments increased
15% and 22%
year-over-year,
respectively, and average selling prices increased 17% and 12%
year-over-year,
respectively, driven by improved product mix toward our new
product lines. Our cloud computing servers were considerable
contributors to the
year-over-year
increase for the second quarter and first half of Fiscal 2011.
During the second quarter of Fiscal 2011, we introduced our
PowerEdge R815 and PowerEdge R715 efficient data center
products, which use the AMD
Opterontm
6100 series processors. We also introduced our PowerConnect
J-series of network offerings.
Storage During the second quarter and first
half of Fiscal 2011, all our Commercial segments had
year-over-year
increases in storage revenue. Dell
EqualLogictm
continues to perform strongly, with
year-over-year
revenue growth of 63% and 69% for the second quarter and first
half of Fiscal 2011, respectively. We are shifting towards more
Dell-branded and co-branded storage offerings, which generally
can be sold with service solutions and provide increased margin
opportunity. During the second quarter of Fiscal 2011, we
introduced our Dell EqualLogic PS6000XVS and Dell EqualLogic
PS6010XVS storage arrays with enhancements to improve density
and performance, as well as our PowerVault MD 3200 and
PowerVault MD3200i storage arrays targeted for
small-to-medium
sized businesses.
Services Services offerings include
infrastructure technology, consulting and applications, and
business process services. Services revenue increased by
$697 million and $1.35 billion
year-over-year
during the second quarter and first half of Fiscal 2011,
respectively, with revenue from Perot Systems contributing a
large proportion of the increase. Perot Systems reported revenue
for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009, of
$628 million and $1.2 billion, respectively. Combining
the results of Perot Systems revenue for the three and six
months ended June 30, 2009, with Dell Services revenue for
the three and six months ended July 31, 2009, does not take
into
36
consideration intercompany charges nor anticipated synergies or
other effects of the integration of Perot Systems. Perot
Systems June 30, 2009, results are presented for
informational purposes only and are not indicative of the
results that actually would have occurred if the acquisition had
been completed at the beginning of Fiscal 2010, nor are they
indicative of future results.
The integration of Perot Systems primarily impacts our Public
and Large Enterprise segments. We continue to view services as a
strategic growth opportunity and will continue to invest in our
offerings and resources focused on increasing our solutions
sales. The dynamics of our services business will continue to
change as we integrate Perot Systems. With Perot Systems, we
have extended our services business further into infrastructure
business process outsourcing, consulting, and application
development as well as our overall customer base. We also
anticipate expanding our existing managed and modular services
businesses.
Our deferred service revenue balance increased 7.4%
year-over-year
to $6.3 billion at July 30, 2010, primarily due to an
increase in up-sell service offerings.
Software and Peripherals Revenue from
sales of software and peripherals (S&P) is
derived from sales of Dell-branded printers, monitors (not sold
with systems), projectors, keyboards, mice, docking stations,
and a multitude of third-party peripherals including LCD
televisions, cameras, stand-alone software sales and related
support services, and other products. The increase in S&P
revenue was driven by overall customer unit shipment increases
due to improvements in demand in displays and electronics, which
experienced a combined
year-over-year
revenue increase of 17% and 18% for the second quarter and first
half of Fiscal 2011, respectively.
Software revenue from our S&P line of business, which
includes software license fees and related post-contract
customer support, is included in services revenue, including
software related on the Condensed Consolidated Statements of
Income. Software and related support services revenue
represented 34% and 43% of services revenue, including software
related during the second quarters of Fiscal 2011 and Fiscal
2010, respectively, and 33% and 42% for the first half of Fiscal
2011 and Fiscal 2010, respectively.
Client
Mobility Revenue from mobility products
(which include notebook computers, mobile workstations, and
smartphones) increased during the second quarter and first half
of Fiscal 2011 across all operating segments due to demand
improvements. Mobility units increased 21% and 24%
year-over-year
for the second quarter and first half of Fiscal 2011,
respectively. Average selling prices were flat for the second
quarter of Fiscal 2011 and decreased 4% for the first half of
Fiscal 2011, due to a shift in product mix to lower priced
mobility product offerings. During the second quarter and first
half of Fiscal 2011, overall, Commercial mobility revenue
increased 30% and 21%
year-over-year,
respectively, and Consumer increased 9% and 17%, respectively.
The increase in Commercial mobility is driven by increases in
demand for our Latitude and Vostro notebooks. We believe the
on-going demand trend towards mobility products will continue,
and we plan to address this demand by expanding our product
platforms to cover broader feature sets and price bands. During
the second quarter of Fiscal 2011, we introduced additional
models to our Inspiron family of notebooks.
Desktop PCs During the second quarter and
first half of Fiscal 2011, revenue from desktop PCs (which
include desktop computer systems and fixed workstations)
increased as unit demand for desktop PCs increased by 12% during
both periods. The average selling price for our desktop
computers increased slightly by 4% and 3%
year-over-year
for the second quarter and first half of Fiscal 2011,
respectively. The increase in unit demand was driven by our
Large Enterprise and SMB customers, with 24% and 27% increases
year-over-year,
respectively, for the second quarter of Fiscal 2011 and 26% and
24%, respectively, for the first half of Fiscal 2011. In the
consumer marketplace, we are continuing to see rising end-user
demand for mobility products, which moderates the demand for
desktop PCs. For the second quarter and first half of Fiscal
2011, unit demand from our Consumer customers for desktop PCs
declined 9% and 6%, respectively, while mobility units increased
11% and 20%
year-over-year,
respectively. We experienced
year-over-year
increases in demand for all our commercial lines of desktop PCs
and fixed work stations including our Optiplex, and Vostro,
desktops and Precision fixed work stations.
37
Interest
and Other, Net
The following table provides a detailed presentation of interest
and other, net for the three and six months ended July 30,
2010, and July 31, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
July 30,
|
|
July 31,
|
|
July 30,
|
|
July 31,
|
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
Interest and other, net:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment income, primarily interest
|
|
$
|
11
|
|
|
$
|
15
|
|
|
$
|
19
|
|
|
$
|
36
|
|
Gains on investments, net
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(46
|
)
|
|
|
(39
|
)
|
|
|
(93
|
)
|
|
|
(68
|
)
|
Foreign exchange
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
(26
|
)
|
|
|
(37
|
)
|
|
|
(26
|
)
|
Other
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest and other, net
|
|
$
|
(49
|
)
|
|
$
|
(42
|
)
|
|
$
|
(117
|
)
|
|
$
|
(44
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We continued to maintain a portfolio of instruments with shorter
maturities, which typically carry lower market yields. Market
yields on short-term instruments declined
year-over-year
for the second quarter and first half of Fiscal 2011, resulting
in lower investment income.
The
year-over-year
increase in interest expense for the second quarter and first
half of Fiscal 2011 was due to higher debt levels, which
increased to $5.3 billion as of July 30, 2010, from
$3.4 billion as of July 31, 2009.
The
year-over-year
change in foreign exchange for the second quarter of Fiscal
2011, as compared to the same period in the prior year, was
primarily due to revaluation of certain unhedged foreign
currency balances. For the first half of Fiscal 2011 as compared
to 2010, foreign exchange increased due to higher costs
associated with the hedging program resulting from currency
volatility.
Income
and Other Taxes
Our effective income tax rate was 21.7% and 25.0% for the second
quarter of Fiscal 2011 and Fiscal 2010, respectively. For the
first half of Fiscal 2011 and Fiscal 2010, our effective income
tax rate was 22.8% and 26.8%, respectively. The decreases in our
effective income tax rate for the second quarter and first half
of Fiscal 2011 were primarily due to the favorable effective
settlement of a tax audit in a foreign jurisdiction,
finalization of certain advanced pricing agreements with foreign
jurisdictions, and also Dells geographical distribution of
taxable income. For Fiscal 2011, we estimate our effective
annual tax rate, including the effect of this favorable
settlement, to be approximately 25%. In the first quarter of
Fiscal 2011, we forecasted our effective annual tax rate to be
27%. The decrease in the forecasted effective annual tax rate is
primarily due to the favorable outcome of the foreign audits and
advanced pricing agreements as mentioned above. The difference
between the estimated effective income tax rate and the U.S.
federal statutory rate of 35% principally results from our
geographical distribution of taxable income and differences
between the book and tax treatment of certain items. The income
tax rate for future quarters of Fiscal 2011 will be impacted by
the actual mix of jurisdictions in which income is generated.
We take certain non-income tax positions in the jurisdictions in
which we operate and have received certain non-income tax
assessments from some of these jurisdictions. We are also
involved in related non-income tax litigation matters in various
jurisdictions. These jurisdictions include Brazil, where we are
in litigation with the government over the proper application of
transactional taxes to warranties and software related to the
sale of computers, as well as over the appropriate use of state
statutory incentives to reduce the transactional taxes. Tax
litigation in Brazil has historically taken multiple years to
resolve. While we believe we will ultimately prevail in the
Brazilian courts, we have also negotiated certain tax incentives
with the state that can be used to offset potential tax
liabilities should the courts rule against us. The incentives
are based upon the number of jobs we maintain within the state.
We have, as expected, received adverse rulings from the tax
administrative court level, and will appeal. In conjunction with
these appeals, we have pledged our manufacturing facility in
Hortolandia, Brazil to the government and have provided a bank
guarantee to begin the appeal process within the judicial courts.
38
We continue to believe our positions are supportable, a
liability is not probable, that we will ultimately prevail, and
that a risk of disruption to our Brazilian manufacturing
operations is remote. In the normal course of business, our
positions and conclusions related to our non-income taxes could
be challenged and assessments may be made. To the extent new
information is obtained and our views on our positions, probable
outcomes of assessments, or litigation change, changes in
estimates to our accrued liabilities would be recorded in the
period in which the determination is made.
ACCOUNTS
RECEIVABLE
We sell products and services directly to customers and through
a variety of sales channels, including a retail distribution
network. At July 30, 2010, our gross accounts receivable
balance was $6.7 billion, an increase of 12% from our
balance at January 29, 2010. The increase in accounts
receivable was primarily attributable to our Commercial revenue
growth during the first half of Fiscal 2011. We maintain an
allowance for doubtful accounts to cover receivables that may be
deemed uncollectible. The allowance for losses is based on
specific identifiable customer accounts that are deemed at risk
and general historical bad debt experience. As of July 30,
2010, and January 29, 2010, the allowance for doubtful
accounts was $93 million and $115 million,
respectively. Our allowance has declined as a percentage of
accounts receivable over the prior year due to improved aging of
balances and better loss experiences. Based on our assessment,
we believe that we are adequately reserved for expected credit
losses. We monitor the aging of our accounts receivable and
continue to take actions to reduce our exposure to credit losses.
FINANCING
RECEIVABLES
At July 30, 2010, and January 29, 2010, our net
financing receivables balances were $3.9 billion and
$3.0 billion, respectively. The increase was primarily the
result of the consolidation of two previously nonconsolidated
qualifying special purpose entities (SPEs) as
discussed below. We expect some growth in financing receivables
to continue throughout Fiscal 2011. To manage the growth in
financing receivables, we will continue to balance the use of
our own working capital and other sources of liquidity,
including securitization programs. Starting in the first quarter
of Fiscal 2011, CIT Group Inc. (CIT), formerly a
joint venture partner of Dell Financial Services L.L.C.
(DFS), our wholly-owned subsidiary, is no longer
funding DFS financing receivables.
During the first half of Fiscal 2011, we continued to transfer
certain customer financing receivables to SPEs in securitization
transactions. The purpose of the SPEs is to facilitate the
funding of customer receivables through financing arrangements
with multi-seller conduits that issue asset-backed debt
securities in the capital markets. We transferred
$524 million and $262 million, respectively, to these
SPEs during the three months ended July 30, 2010, and
July 31, 2009, and $1 billion and $495 million
during the first half of Fiscal 2011 and Fiscal 2010,
respectively. Our risk of loss related to these securitized
receivables is limited to the amount of our
over-collateralization in the transferred pool of receivables.
We have a securitization program to fund revolving loans through
a consolidated SPE, which we account for as a secured borrowing.
Additionally, as of January 29, 2010, the two SPEs that
funded fixed-term leases and loans were not consolidated. As of
the beginning of the first quarter of Fiscal 2011, we adopted
the new accounting guidance that requires us to apply variable
interest entity accounting to these special purpose entities and
therefore, consolidated the two remaining nonconsolidated SPEs.
The impact of the adoption resulted in a decrease to beginning
retained earnings for Fiscal 2011 of $13 million. There was
no impact to our results of operations or our cash flows upon
adoption of the new accounting guidance. Starting in the first
quarter of Fiscal 2011, we account for these fixed-term
securitization programs as secured borrowings. At July 30,
2010, and January 29, 2010, the structured financing debt
related to all of our secured borrowing securitization programs
was $918 million and $164 million, respectively, and
the carrying amount of the corresponding financing receivables
was $1.3 billion and $0.3 billion, respectively.
We maintain an allowance to cover expected financing receivable
credit losses and we evaluate credit loss expectations based on
our total portfolio. For the periods ended July 30, 2010,
and January 29, 2010, the annualized principal charge-off
rate for our total portfolio was 6.7% and 8.2%, respectively.
The allowance for losses is determined based on various factors,
including historical and anticipated experience, past due
receivables, receivable type, and customer risk profile. At
July 30, 2010, and January 29, 2010, the allowance for
39
financing receivable losses was $277 million and
$237 million, respectively. In general, we are seeing
improving loss rates associated with our financing receivables
as the economy has stabilized. The increase in the allowance is
primarily due to the incremental allowance from the
consolidation of variable interest entities and an additional
allowance related to assets that were included in a qualified
special purpose entity and consolidated during the second
quarter of Fiscal 2010, which have liquidated slower than we
originally anticipated. Based on our assessment of the customer
financing receivables, we believe that we are adequately
reserved.
The Credit Card Accountability, Responsibility, and Disclosure
Act of 2009 was signed into U.S. law on May 22, 2009, and
has affected the consumer financing provided by DFS. Commercial
credit is unaffected by the changes in law. A majority of the
provisions of the law are now in effect. This Act imposed new
restrictions on credit card companies in the areas of marketing,
servicing, and pricing of consumer credit accounts. The changes
have not substantially altered how consumer credit is offered to
our customers or how their accounts are serviced. We do not feel
that the impact of these changes is material to Dells
financial results.
See Note 5 of Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements included in Part I
Item 1 Financial Statements for
additional information about our financing receivables.
OFF-BALANCE
SHEET ARRANGEMENTS
With the consolidation of our previously nonconsolidated special
purpose entities, we no longer have off-balance sheet financing
arrangements.
LIQUIDITY
AND CAPITAL COMMITMENTS
Current
Market Conditions
We regularly monitor economic conditions and associated impacts
on the financial markets and our business. Though there were
signs of improvement in the global economic environment during
the first half of Fiscal 2011, we continue to be cautious given
the volatility associated with international sovereign economies
and other economic indicators. We continue to evaluate the
financial health of our supplier base, carefully manage customer
credit, diversify counterparty risk, and monitor the
concentration risk of our cash and cash equivalents balances
globally. Additionally, we maintain a conservative investment
portfolio with shorter duration and high quality assets.
We monitor credit risk associated with our financial
counterparties using various market credit risk indicators such
as credit ratings issued by nationally recognized rating
agencies and changes in market credit default swap levels. We
perform periodic evaluations of our positions with these
counterparties and may limit exposure to any one counterparty in
accordance with our policies. We monitor and manage these
activities depending on current and expected market developments.
See Part I Item 1A
Risk Factors in our Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended January 29, 2010, for further
discussion of risks associated with instability in the financial
markets as well as our use of counterparties. We believe that no
significant concentration of credit risk exists for our
investments. The impact on our Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements of any credit adjustments related to these
counterparties has been immaterial.
Liquidity
We ended the second quarter of Fiscal 2011 with
$13.1 billion in cash, cash equivalents, and investments
compared to $12.7 billion at the end of the second quarter
of Fiscal 2010. Cash generated from operations is our primary
source of operating liquidity and we believe that internally
generated cash flows are sufficient to support business
operations. We have an active working capital management team
that monitors the efficiency of our balance sheet by evaluating
liquidity under various macroeconomic and competitive scenarios.
These scenarios quantify risks to the financial statements and
provide a basis for actions necessary to ensure adequate
liquidity, both domestically and internationally. We utilize
external capital sources, such as notes and other term debt,
commercial paper, or structured financing arrangements, to
supplement our internally generated sources of liquidity as
necessary. In addition, we have a currently effective shelf
registration statement filed with the SEC for the issuance of an
40
indeterminate amount of debt securities which we have used and
expect to use to issue debt securities before its expiration or
replacement during the first quarter of Fiscal 2012. We have
continued to have access to the capital markets in recent
periods. Any future disruptions, uncertainty or volatility in
those markets may result in higher funding costs for us and
adversely affect our ability to obtain funds. We intend to
maintain the appropriate debt levels based upon cash flow
expectations, the overall cost of capital, cash requirements for
operations, and discretionary spending, including for
acquisitions and share repurchases. Due to the overall strength
of our financial position, we believe that we will have adequate
access to capital markets.
Our cash balances are held in numerous locations throughout the
world, including substantial amounts held outside of the U.S.
Where local regulations limit an efficient intercompany transfer
of amounts held outside of the U.S., we will continue to utilize
these funds for local liquidity needs. Under current law,
balances available to be repatriated back to the U.S. would be
subject to U.S. federal income taxes, less applicable foreign
tax credits. We have provided for the U.S. federal tax liability
on these amounts for financial statement purposes, except for
foreign earnings that are considered permanently reinvested
outside of the U.S. We utilize a variety of tax planning and
financing strategies with the objective of having our worldwide
cash available in the locations where it is needed. Our
non-U.S.
domiciled cash and investments are generally denominated in the
U.S. dollar.
The following table contains a summary of our Condensed
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the respective periods:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
July 30,
|
|
July 31,
|
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
Net change in cash from:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating activities
|
|
$
|
1,573
|
|
|
$
|
1,837
|
|
Investing activities
|
|
|
(620
|
)
|
|
|
40
|
|
Financing activities
|
|
|
125
|
|
|
|
1,379
|
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
(19
|
)
|
|
|
91
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
1,059
|
|
|
$
|
3,347
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Activities The decrease in
operating cash flows was primarily led by less favorable changes
in working capital during the first half of Fiscal 2010, the
effects of which were partially offset by the increase in net
income and deferred revenue. See Key Performance
Metrics below for additional discussion of our cash
conversion cycle.
Investing Activities Investing
activities consist of the net of maturities and sales and
purchases of investments; net capital expenditures for property,
plant, and equipment; and net cash used to fund strategic
acquisitions. During the first half of Fiscal 2011, net cash
used for investment activities was $225 million, as
compared to a net cash sourced of $206 million during the
first half of Fiscal 2010 due to a shift from cash equivalents
to short-term investments. Cash used to fund strategic
acquisitions, net of cash acquired, was approximately
$222 million during the first half of Fiscal 2011,
primarily related to the acquisition of KACE and Ocarina,
compared to $3 million during the first half of Fiscal 2010.
Financing Activities Financing
activities primarily consist of proceeds and repayments from
borrowings and the repurchase of our common stock. The
year-over-year
decrease in cash provided by financing activities for the first
half of Fiscal 2011 was mainly due to net proceeds from issuance
of long-term debt of $1.5 billion during the first half of
Fiscal 2010. We had $3.3 billion in principal of long-term
notes outstanding as of July 30, 2010, and July 31,
2009. During the first half of Fiscal 2011, net proceeds from
the issuance of commercial paper and structured financing debt
was $514 million. We repurchased 26 million shares for
$400 million during the first half of Fiscal 2011 and we
expect to repurchase shares throughout the remainder of the
fiscal year. We did not repurchase any shares during the first
half of Fiscal 2010.
During the second quarter of Fiscal 2011, we entered into a new
agreement to expand our commercial paper program to
$2 billion. We have $2 billion of senior unsecured
revolving credit facilities supporting the commercial
41
paper program. Our $2 billion of credit facilities consist
of two agreements, with $1 billion expiring on June 1,
2011, and the remaining $1 billion expiring on
April 2, 2013.
During the first half of Fiscal 2011, we issued commercial paper
with original maturities of less than 90 days and we
continue to be active in the commercial paper market by issuing
short-term borrowings to augment our liquidity as needed. As of
July 30, 2010, we had $900 million outstanding under
the commercial paper program. We did not have any commercial
paper outstanding as of July 31, 2009.
We issued structured financing-related debt to fund our
financing receivables as previously discussed in the
Financing Receivables section above. The total debt
capacity of our securitization programs is $1.1 billion. As
of July 30, 2010, we had $918 million in outstanding
structured financing-related debt. In connection with the annual
renewal process of our securitization programs, we are currently
evaluating changes in the U.S. bank regulatory environment and
potential impacts to our securitization activities. Depending on
market conditions, we may introduce additional banking partners
or expand capacity under our existing programs. As we negotiate
these annual renewals, which will begin in October 2010,
management will continue to assess the costs and benefits of
continuing to use securitization programs to fund our
receivables. We do not currently foresee significant challenges
in the renewal process and we expect to be able to continue to
offer or arrange financing to our customers.
See Note 6 of the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements under Part I Item 1
Financial Statements for further discussion of our debt.
Key Performance Metrics Our cash
conversion cycle for the six months ended July 30, 2010,
improved from the six months ended July 31, 2009. Our
business model allows us to maintain an efficient cash
conversion cycle, which compares favorably with that of others
in our industry.
The following table presents the components of our cash
conversion cycle at July 30, 2010, and July 31, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
July 30,
|
|
July 31,
|
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
Days of sales
outstanding(a)
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
|
42
|
|
Days of supply in
inventory(b)
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
Days in accounts
payable(c)
|
|
|
(87
|
)
|
|
|
(84
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash conversion cycle
|
|
|
(36
|
)
|
|
|
(35
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
|
Days of sales outstanding
(DSO) calculates the average collection period of
our receivables. DSO is based on the ending net trade
receivables and the most recent quarterly revenue for each
period. DSO also includes the effect of product costs related to
customer shipments not yet recognized as revenue that are
classified in other current assets. DSO is calculated by adding
accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts, and
customer shipments in transit and dividing that sum by average
net revenue per day for the current quarter (90 days). At
July 30, 2010, and July 31, 2009, DSO and days of
customer shipments not yet recognized were 38 and 3 days,
and 38 and 4 days, respectively.
|
|
|
|
(b)
|
|
Days of supply in inventory
(DSI) measures the average number of days from
procurement to sale of our product. DSI is based on ending
inventory and most recent quarterly cost of sales for each
period. DSI is calculated by dividing inventory by average cost
of goods sold per day for the current quarter (90 days).
|
|
|
|
(c)
|
|
Days in accounts payable
(DPO) calculates the average number of days our
payables remain outstanding before payment. DPO is based on
ending accounts payable and most recent quarterly cost of sales
for each period. DPO is calculated by dividing accounts payable
by average cost of goods sold per day for the current quarter
(90 days).
|
Our cash conversion cycle improved one day at July 30,
2010, from July 31, 2009, driven by a three day improvement
in DPO and a one day decrease in DSO, which was partially offset
by a three day increase in DSI. The improvement in DPO from
July 31, 2009, was attributable to our ongoing transition
to contract manufacturing, further standardization of vendor
agreements, and timing of supplier purchases and payments during
the first half of Fiscal 2011 as compared to the same period of
Fiscal 2010. The decrease in DSO from July 31, 2009 is
consistent with the revenue growth we experienced over the prior
year. The increase in DSI from July 31, 2009, was primarily
attributable to an increase in strategic materials purchases and
finished goods inventory.
42
We defer the cost of revenue associated with customer shipments
not yet recognized as revenue until they are delivered. These
deferred costs are included in our reported DSO because we
believe this reporting results in a more accurate presentation
of our DSO and cash conversion cycle. These deferred costs are
recorded in other current assets in our Condensed Consolidated
Statements of Financial Position and totaled $556 million
and $537 million, at July 30, 2010, and July 31,
2009, respectively.
We believe that we can generate cash flow from operations in
excess of net income over the long term and can operate our cash
conversion cycle at negative mid-thirty days or better.
Capital
Commitments
Share Repurchase Program We have a
share repurchase program that authorizes us to purchase shares
of common stock through a systematic program of open market
purchases in order to increase shareholder value and manage
dilution resulting from shares issued under our equity
compensation plans. However, we do not currently have a policy
that requires the repurchase of common stock to offset
share-based compensation arrangements. For more information
regarding share repurchases, see Part II
Item 2 Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities
and Use of Proceeds.
Capital Expenditures During the three
months and six months ended July 30, 2010, we spent
$145 million and $191 million, respectively, on
property, plant, and equipment primarily in connection with our
global expansion efforts and infrastructure investments made to
support future growth. We spent $99 million and
$179 million for the three and six months ended
July 31, 2009, respectively on property, plant, and
equipment. Product demand, product mix, and the increased use of
contract manufacturers, as well as ongoing investments in
operating and information technology infrastructure, influence
the level and prioritization of our capital expenditures. Total
capital expenditures for Fiscal 2011, which will be primarily
related to infrastructure investments and strategic initiatives,
are currently expected to total approximately $500 million.
These expenditures are expected to be funded from our cash flows
from operating activities.
Restricted Cash As of July 30,
2010, and January 29, 2010, we have restricted cash in the
amount of $171 million and $147 million, respectively,
included in other current assets. These balances primarily
relate to an agreement between DFS and CIT which requires us to
maintain escrow cash accounts that are held as recourse reserves
for credit losses, performance fee deposits related to our
private label credit card, and deferred servicing revenue, as
well as amounts maintained in escrow accounts related to our
recent acquisitions.
RECENTLY
ISSUED AND ADOPTED ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
See Note 1 of Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements included in Part I
Item 1
Financial Statements for a description of
recently issued and adopted accounting pronouncements, including
the expected dates of adoption and estimated effects on our
results of operations, financial position, and cash flows.
|
|
ITEM 3.
|
QUANTITATIVE
AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
|
For a description of our market risks, see
Part II Item 7
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations Market Risk in our
Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended January 29, 2010. Our exposure to
market risks has not changed materially from the description in
the Annual Report on
Form 10-K.
|
|
ITEM 4.
|
CONTROLS
AND PROCEDURES
|
This Report includes the certifications of our Chief Executive
Officer and Chief Financial Officer required by
Rule 13a-14
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the Exchange
Act). See Exhibits 31.1 and 31.2 to this report. This
Item 4 includes information concerning the controls and
control evaluations referred to in those certifications.
43
EVALUATION
OF DISCLOSURE CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and
Procedures Disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in
Rules 13a-15(e)
and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act) are designed to ensure
that information required to be disclosed in reports filed or
submitted under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed,
summarized, and reported within the time periods specified in
SEC rules and forms and that such information is accumulated and
communicated to management, including the chief executive
officer and the chief financial officer, to allow timely
decisions regarding required disclosures.
In connection with the preparation of this Report, our
management, under the supervision and with the participation of
the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer,
conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and
operation of our disclosure controls and procedures as of
July 30, 2010. Based on that evaluation, our Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded
that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of
July 30, 2010.
SEC Settlement Undertakings As part of our
settlement of an SEC investigation into certain disclosure,
accounting and financial reporting matters described under the
caption Legal Matters in Note 12 of Notes to
Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements included in
Part I Item 1 Financial
Statements, we have consented to perform the following
undertakings related to our disclosure processes, practices and
controls:
|
|
|
|
|
For a minimum period of three years, enhance our disclosure
review committee (DRC) processes by having qualified
outside securities counsel attend all DRC meetings and review
all of our SEC periodic filings prior to filing.
|
|
|
|
Within 30 days after court approval of the settlement,
retain an independent consultant not unacceptable to the SEC
staff to review and evaluate our disclosure processes, practices
and controls and to recommend changes designed to improve those
processes, practices and controls, and, within 90 days
after issuance of the independent consultants report
containing such review, evaluation and recommendations, which
will be due within 120 days, adopt and implement all
recommendations contained in the report.
|
|
|
|
For a minimum period of three years, provide annual training
reasonably designed to minimize the possibility of future
violations of the disclosure requirements of the federal
securities laws, with a focus on disclosures required in
managements discussion and analysis of financial condition
and results of operations, for (1) members of the Audit
Committee of our Board of Directors; (2) members of the
DRC; (3) our senior officers; (4) our internal
disclosure counsel; (5) personnel in our internal audit
department that perform assurance services; (6) all persons
required to certify in our filings with the SEC that such
filings make adequate disclosure under the federal securities
laws; and (7) all other persons employed by us who have
responsibility for the review of our filings with the SEC.
|
We will be required to certify to the SEC staff that we have
complied with the foregoing undertakings.
We have initiated action to perform each of the foregoing
undertakings.
CHANGES
IN INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING
There was no change in our internal control over financial
reporting during the second quarter of Fiscal 2011 that
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
44
PART II
OTHER INFORMATION
|
|
ITEM 1.
|
LEGAL
PROCEEDINGS
|
The information required by this item is set forth under the
caption Legal Matters in Note 12 of Notes to
Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements included in
Part I Item 1 Financial
Statements, and is incorporated by reference into this
Item 1 of Part II of this report.
Additional information on Dells commitments and
contingencies can be found in Dells Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended January 29, 2010.
ITEM 1A.
RISK FACTORS
In addition to the other information set forth in this report,
the factors discussed in Part I
Item 1A Risk Factors in our Annual Report
on
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended January 29, 2010, could
materially affect our business, financial condition or operating
results. The risks described in our Annual Report on
Form 10-K
are not the only risks facing us. There are additional risks and
uncertainties not currently known to us or that we currently
deem to be immaterial, that may also materially adversely affect
our business, financial condition, or operating results.
In addition to the risks described in our Annual Report on
Form 10-K,
the following risk may adversely affect our business, financial
condition, or operating results:
We are subject to the risk of temporary suspension or
debarment from contracting with U.S. federal, state and local
governments as a result of settlements of an SEC investigation
by our company and our Chairman and CEO.
As part of settlements of an SEC investigation into certain
disclosure, accounting and financial reporting matters, we and
our Chairman and CEO consented, without admitting or denying the
SECs allegations, to a permanent injunction against future
violations of certain provisions of the federal securities laws.
The existence and terms of such injunctions may adversely affect
our business under contracts with U.S. federal, state and local
governments. The procurement regulations of federal governmental
agencies and many state and local governments with which we do
business generally vest those governments with broad discretion
to suspend or debar companies from product and services
contracts for periods of generally up to three years if the
governments determine that companies do not prospectively
qualify as responsible contracting parties. The various levels
of government could also require us to operate under special
reporting and other compliance measures, which could increase
our costs of performance under the applicable contracts.
45
|
|
ITEM 2.
|
UNREGISTERED
SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS
|
PURCHASES
OF COMMON STOCK
Share
Repurchase Program
We have a share repurchase program that authorizes us to
purchase shares of common stock in order to increase shareholder
value and manage dilution resulting from shares issued under our
equity compensation plans. However, we do not currently have a
policy that requires the repurchase of common stock in
conjunction with share-based payment arrangements. The following
table sets forth information regarding our repurchases or
acquisitions of common stock during the second quarter of Fiscal
2011 and the remaining authorized amount for future purchases
under our share repurchase program:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
Approximate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
Dollar Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
of Shares That
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchased
|
|
May Yet Be
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
as Part of
|
|
Purchased
|
|
|
Total
|
|
Weighted
|
|
Publicly
|
|
Under the
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
Average
|
|
Announced
|
|
Announced
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
Price Paid
|
|
Plans or
|
|
Plans or
|
Period
|
|
Purchased(a)
|
|
per Share
|
|
Programs(b)
|
|
Programs(b)
|
|
|
(in millions, except average price paid per share)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 1, 2010, through May 28, 2010
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
4,343
|
|
May 29, 2010, through June 25, 2010
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
$
|
13.87
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
$
|
4,143
|
|
June 26, 2010, through July 30, 2010
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
4,143
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
$
|
13.87
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
|
Includes 3,645 shares withheld
to cover employee tax obligations for restricted stock awards
vested during quarter ended July 30, 2010 at an average
price of $13.39 per share.
|
|
|
|
(b)
|
|
On December 4, 2007, we
publicly announced that our Board of Directors had authorized a
share repurchase program for up to $10 billion of our
common stock over an unspecified amount of time.
|
Exhibits See Index to Exhibits below
following the signature page to this report.
46
SIGNATURE
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on
its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
DELL INC.
|
|
|
|
Date: August 26, 2010
|
|
/s/ THOMAS W. SWEET
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thomas W. Sweet
|
|
|
Vice President, Corporate Finance and
|
|
|
Chief Accounting Officer
|
|
|
(On behalf of the registrant and as
|
|
|
principal accounting officer)
|
47
INDEX TO
EXHIBITS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
|
|
No.
|
|
|
|
Description of Exhibit
|
|
3
|
.1
|
|
|
|
Restated Certificate of Incorporation, as amended
|
|
3
|
.2
|
|
|
|
Restated Bylaws, as amended and effective as of August 16,
2010
|
|
4
|
.1
|
|
|
|
Indenture, dated as of April 27, 1998, between Dell
Computer Corporation and Chase Bank of Texas, National
Association (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.2 of
Dells Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed April 28, 1998, Commission File
No. 0-17017)
|
|
4
|
.2
|
|
|
|
Officers Certificate pursuant to Section 301 of the
Indenture establishing the terms of Dells 7.10% Senior
Debentures Due 2028 (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 99.4 of Dells Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed April 28, 1998, Commission File
No. 0-17017)
|
|
4
|
.3
|
|
|
|
Form of Dells 7.10% Senior Debentures Due 2028
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.6 of Dells
Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed April 28, 1998, Commission File
No. 0-17017)
|
|
4
|
.4
|
|
|
|
Indenture, dated as of April 17, 2008, between Dell Inc.
and The Bank of New York Trust Company, N.A., as trustee
(including the form of notes) (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 4.1 of Dells Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed April 17, 2008, Commission file
No. 0-17017)
|
|
4
|
.5
|
|
|
|
Indenture, dated April 6, 2009, between Dell Inc. and The
Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as trustee
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 of Dells
Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed April 6, 2009, Commission file
No. 0-17017)
|
|
4
|
.6
|
|
|
|
First Supplemental Indenture, dated April 6, 2009, between
Dell Inc. and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company,
N.A., as trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2
of Dells Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed April 6, 2009, Commission file
No. 0-17017)
|
|
4
|
.7
|
|
|
|
Form of 5.625% Notes due 2014 (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 4.3 of Dells Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed April 6, 2009, Commission file
No. 0-17017)
|
|
4
|
.8
|
|
|
|
Second Supplemental Indenture, dated as of June 15, 2009,
between Dell Inc. and The Bank of New York Mellon
Trust Company, N.A., as trustee (incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 4.1 of Dells Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed June 15, 2009, Commission file
No. 0-17017)
|
|
4
|
.9
|
|
|
|
Form of 3.375% Notes due 2012 (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 4.2 of Dells Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed June 15, 2009, Commission file
No. 0-17017)
|
|
4
|
.10
|
|
|
|
Form of 5.875% Notes due 2019 (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 4.3 of Dells Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed June 15, 2009, Commission file
No. 0-17017)
|
|
12
|
.1
|
|
|
|
Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
|
|
31
|
.1
|
|
|
|
Certification of Michael S. Dell, Chairman and Chief Executive
Officer, pursuant to
Rule 13a-14(a)
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant
to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
|
|
31
|
.2
|
|
|
|
Certification of Brian T. Gladden, Senior Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer, pursuant to
Rule 13a-14(a)
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant
to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
|
|
32
|
.1
|
|
|
|
Certifications of Michael S. Dell, Chairman and Chief Executive
Officer, and Brian T. Gladden, Senior Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002
|
|
|
|
|
|
Filed with this report.
|
|
|
|
Furnished with this report.
|
48