UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

 

SCHEDULE 14A

 

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the Securities

Exchange Act of 1934 (Amendment No.  )

 

Filed by the Registrant þ

 

Filed by a Party other than the Registrant o

 

Check the appropriate box:

 

o  Preliminary Proxy Statement

o  Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))

þ  Definitive Proxy Statement

o  Definitive Additional Materials

o  Soliciting Material Pursuant to §240.14a-12

 

 

The TJX Companies, Inc.

(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)

 

(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)

 

Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):

 

 

 

 

 

 

Rule 0-11 (Set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was

determined):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

770 Cochituate Road
Framingham, Massachusetts 01701

 

 

April 28, 2010

 

Dear Stockholder:

 

We cordially invite you to attend our 2010 Annual Meeting on Wednesday, June 2, 2010, at 11:00 a.m., to be held at our offices, 770 Cochituate Road, Framingham, Massachusetts. Please enter through the Northeast Entrance.

 

The proxy statement accompanying this letter describes the business we will consider at the meeting. Your vote is important regardless of the number of shares you own. Please read the proxy statement and vote your shares. Instructions for Internet and telephone voting are attached to your proxy card. If you prefer, you can vote by mail by completing and signing your proxy card and returning it in the enclosed envelope.

 

We hope that you will be able to join us on June 2nd.

 

 

 

Printed on Recycled Paper

The TJX Companies, Inc.

 

 

 

 

NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS

 

June 2, 2010

 

 

 

The Annual Meeting of Stockholders of The TJX Companies, Inc. will be held at our offices, 770 Cochituate Road, Framingham, Massachusetts, on Wednesday, June 2, 2010, at 11:00 a.m. to vote on:

 

 

Stockholders of record at the close of business on April 12, 2010 are entitled to notice of and to vote at the Annual Meeting and any adjournment or postponement thereof.

 

To attend the Annual Meeting, you must demonstrate that you were a TJX stockholder as of the close of business on April 12, 2010 or hold a valid proxy for the Annual Meeting from such a stockholder. If you are not a stockholder of record but hold shares through a broker, trustee or nominee, you will need to bring proof of your beneficial ownership as of April 12, 2010, such as a brokerage account statement showing your ownership on that date or similar evidence of such ownership. All stockholders will need to have their photographs taken and receive visitor badges for building security. Please allow additional time for these procedures.

 

By Order of the Board of Directors

 

Ann McCauley

Secretary

 

Framingham, Massachusetts

April 28, 2010

 

PLEASE VOTE ON THE INTERNET, BY TELEPHONE OR BY MAIL

 

The TJX Companies, Inc.

 

 

 

ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS

 

June 2, 2010

 

PROXY STATEMENT

 

 

 

The Board of Directors of The TJX Companies, Inc., or TJX, is soliciting your proxy for the 2010 Annual Meeting. A majority of the shares outstanding and entitled to vote at the meeting is required for a quorum for the meeting.

 

You may vote on the Internet, using the procedures and instructions described on the proxy card and other enclosures. You may vote by telephone using the toll-free telephone number on the proxy card. Both Internet and telephone voting provide easy-to-follow instructions and have procedures designed to authenticate your identity and permit you to confirm that your voting instructions are accurately reflected. Street name holders may vote by Internet or telephone if their banks or brokers make those methods available, in which case the banks or brokers will enclose the instructions with the proxy statement. All stockholders may vote by signing and returning the enclosed proxy card.

 

You may revoke your proxy at any time before it is voted by voting later by telephone or Internet, returning a later-dated proxy card, or delivering a written revocation to the Secretary of TJX.

 

Stockholders of record at the close of business on April 12, 2010 are entitled to vote at the meeting. Each of the 408,394,960 shares of common stock outstanding on the record date is entitled to one vote.

 

This proxy statement, the proxy card and the Annual Report and Form 10-K for our fiscal year ended January 30, 2010 are being first mailed to stockholders on or about the date of the notice of meeting. Our address is 770 Cochituate Road, Framingham, Massachusetts 01701.

 

Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Annual Meeting To Be Held on June 2, 2010: This proxy statement and Annual Report and Form 10-K for our fiscal year ended January 30, 2010 are available at http://bnymellon.mobular.net/bnymellon/tjx.

 

PROPOSAL 1

 

ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

 

We seek nominees with established strong professional reputations, sophistication and experience in the retail and consumer industries. We also seek nominees with experience in substantive areas that are important to our business such as international operations; marketing and brand management; sales, buying and distribution; legal; accounting, finance and capital structure; strategic planning and leadership of complex organizations; human resources and development practices; and strategy and innovation. Our nominees hold or have held senior executive positions in large, complex organizations or in businesses related to important substantive areas, and in these positions have also gained experience in core management skills and substantive areas relevant to our business. Most of our nominees also have experience serving on boards of directors and board committees of other public companies, and each of our nominees has an understanding of corporate governance practices and trends. In addition, all of our nominees have prior service on our Board, which has provided them with significant exposure to both our business and the industry in which we compete. We believe that all our nominees possess the professional and personal qualifications necessary for board service, and we have highlighted particularly noteworthy attributes for each director in the individual biographies below.

 

The individuals listed below have been nominated and are standing for election at this year’s Annual Meeting. If elected, they will hold office until our 2011 Annual Meeting of Stockholders and until their successors are duly elected and qualified. All of our current directors were elected to the Board by stockholders.

 

Your Board of Directors unanimously recommends that you vote FOR the election of each of the nominees as director.

 

José B. Alvarez, 46

Director since 2007

 

Mr. Alvarez has been a member of the faculty of the Harvard Business School since 2009. From August 2008 through December 2008, Mr. Alvarez was the Global Executive Vice President for Business Development for Ahold, a global supermarket retail company. From 2001 to August 2008, he held various executive positions with Stop & Shop/Giant-Landover, Ahold’s U.S. subsidiary, including President and Chief Executive Officer of Stop & Shop/Giant-Landover from 2006 to 2008 and Executive Vice President, Supply Chain and Logistics from 2004 to 2006. Previously, he served in executive positions at Shaw’s Supermarkets, Inc. and began his career at the Jewel Food Stores subsidiary of American Stores Company in 1990. Mr. Alvarez is also a director of United Rentals, Inc. Mr. Alvarez’s long career in retail has given him broad experience in large retail chain management, including store management, supply chain, logistics, distribution and strategy.

 

Alan M. Bennett, 59

Director since 2007

 

Mr. Bennett served as Interim Chief Executive Officer of H&R Block Inc., a tax services provider, from November 2007 through August 2008. He was Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer and a Member of the Office of the Chairman of Aetna, Inc., a diversified healthcare benefits company, from 2001 to 2007, and previously held other senior financial management positions at Aetna after joining in 1995. Mr. Bennett held various senior management roles in finance and sales/marketing at Pirelli Armstrong Tire Corporation, formerly Armstrong Rubber Company, from 1981 to 1995 and began his career with Ernst & Ernst (now Ernst & Young LLP). Mr. Bennett is also a director of Halliburton Company and H&R Block Inc. and was a director of Bausch & Lomb, Inc. from 2004 to 2007. Mr. Bennett’s leadership experience in two significant financial businesses provides him with expertise including financial management, taxes, accounting, controls, finance and financial reporting as well as executive and change management.

David A. Brandon, 57

Director since 2001

 

Mr. Brandon was named the Director of Intercollegiate Athletics at the University of Michigan, effective March 2010. Mr. Brandon previously served as the Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and a director of Domino’s Pizza, Inc., a pizza delivery company, from 1999 until March 2010 and continues to serve as Non-Executive Chairman and a director of Domino’s. Mr. Brandon was President and Chief Executive Officer of Valassis, Inc., a provider of marketing products and services, from 1989 to 1998 and Chairman of its Board from 1997 to 1998. Mr. Brandon is also a director of Burger King Holdings, Inc. and Kaydon Corporation and served as a director of Northwest Airlines Corporation from 2007 to 2008. Mr. Brandon has extensive executive management experience and brings insights including management of rapid growth and international expansion, marketing, advertising, brand management and operations.

 

Bernard Cammarata, 70

Director since 1989

 

Mr. Cammarata has been Chairman of the Board of TJX since 1999. Mr. Cammarata served as Acting Chief Executive Officer of TJX from September 2005 to January 2007. He also led TJX and its former TJX subsidiary and T.J. Maxx Division from the organization of the business in 1976 until 2000, including serving as Chief Executive Officer and President of TJX, Chairman and President of TJX’s T.J. Maxx Division and Chairman of The Marmaxx Group. As the founder of TJX, Mr. Cammarata has participated in the leadership of TJX’s successful strategy and development from the beginning to its current position as the world’s largest off-price retailer and offers deep expertise in all aspects of TJX’s business, including management, operations, marketing, buying, distribution and financial matters.

 

David T. Ching, 57

Director since 2007

 

Mr. Ching has been Senior Vice President and Chief Information Officer for Safeway Inc., a food and drug retailer, since 1994. Previously, Mr. Ching was the General Manager for British American Consulting Group, a software and consulting firm focusing on the distribution and retail industry. He also worked for Lucky Stores Inc., a subsidiary of American Stores Company from 1979 to 1993, including serving as the Senior Vice President of Information Systems. Mr. Ching was a director of Petco Animal Supplies, Inc. from 2005 to 2007. Mr. Ching’s strong technological experience and related management positions in the retail industry provide Mr. Ching expertise including information systems, information security and controls, technology implementation and operation, reporting and distribution in the retail industry.

 

Michael F. Hines, 54

Director since 2007

 

Mr. Hines served as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Dick’s Sporting Goods, Inc., a sporting goods retailer, from 1995 to 2007. From 1990 to 1995, he held management positions with Staples, Inc., an office products retailer, most recently as Vice President, Finance. Mr. Hines spent 12 years in public accounting, the last eight years with the accounting firm Deloitte & Touche LLP. Mr. Hines was a director of The Yankee Candle Company, Inc. from 2003 to 2007. Mr. Hines’ experience as a financial executive and certified public accountant provides him with expertise in the retail industry including accounting, controls, financial reporting, tax, finance, risk management and financial management.

 

Amy B. Lane, 57

Director since 2005

 

Ms. Lane was a Managing Director and Group Leader of the Global Retailing Investment Banking Group at Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc., from 1997 until her retirement in 2002. Ms. Lane previously served as a Managing Director at Salomon Brothers, Inc., where she founded and led the retail industry investment banking unit. Ms. Lane was also a director of Borders Group, Inc. from 1995 to 1999 and from 2001 to 2009,

and a trustee of MFS Funds from 2004 to 2006 and of Federal Realty Investment Trust from 2002 to 2006. Ms. Lane’s experience as the leader of two investment banking practices covering the global retailing industry has given her substantial experience with financial services, capital markets, finance and accounting, capital structure, acquisitions and divestitures in that industry as well as management, leadership and strategy.

 

Carol Meyrowitz, 56

Director since 2006

 

Ms. Meyrowitz has been Chief Executive Officer of TJX since January 2007, a director since September 2006 and President since October 2005. She served as Senior Executive Vice President of TJX from 2004 until January 2005, Executive Vice President of TJX from 2001 to 2004 and President of The Marmaxx Group from 2001 to January 2005. From January 2005 until October 2005, she was employed in an advisory role for TJX and consulted for Berkshire Partners LLC, a private equity firm. From 1987 to 2001, she held various senior management positions with The Marmaxx Group and with Chadwick’s of Boston and Hit or Miss, former divisions of TJX. Ms. Meyrowitz is also a director of Amscan Holdings, Inc. and Staples, Inc. and was a director of The Yankee Candle Company, Inc. from 2004 to 2007. As President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and through the many other positions Ms. Meyrowitz has held with TJX since joining in 1987, Ms Meyrowitz has a deep understanding of TJX and broad experience in all aspects of off-price retail, including innovation, strategy, buying, distribution, marketing, real estate, finance and accounting, and international operations.

 

John F. O’Brien, 67

Director since 1996

 

Mr. O’Brien is the retired Chief Executive Officer and President of Allmerica Financial Corporation (now The Hanover Insurance Group, Inc.), an insurance and diversified financial services company, holding those positions from 1995 to 2002. Mr. O’Brien previously held executive positions at Fidelity Investments, an asset management firm, including Group Managing Director of FMR Corporation, Chairman of Institutional Services Company and Chairman of Brokerage Services, Inc. Mr. O’Brien serves as our Lead Director. Mr. O’Brien is also non-executive Chairman and a director of Cabot Corporation, a director of LKQ Corporation and a director of a family of 35 registered investment companies managed by BlackRock, Inc., an investment management advisory firm. From 1989 to 2006, Mr. O’Brien was a director of ABIOMED, Inc. Mr. O’Brien has substantial executive experience with two financial services businesses, giving him expertise including general management and oversight with respect to strategy, financial planning, insurance, operations, finance and capital structure.

 

Willow B. Shire, 62

Director since 1995

 

Ms. Shire has been an executive consultant with Orchard Consulting Group since 1994, specializing in leadership development and strategic problem solving. Previously, she was Chairperson for the Computer Systems Public Policy Project within the National Academy of Science. She also held various positions at Digital Equipment Corporation, a computer hardware manufacturer, for 18 years, including Vice President and Officer, Health Industries Business Unit. Ms. Shire was a director of Vitesse Semiconductor Corporation from 2007 to 2009. Through her consulting experience and prior business experience, Ms. Shire brings expertise in leadership development, talent assessment, change management, human resources and development practices, cultural assessment and strategic problem solving.

 

Fletcher H. Wiley, 67

Director since 1990

 

Mr. Wiley was Executive Vice President and General Counsel of PRWT Services, Inc., a technology-oriented products and services firm, from 1996 to 2008. Since 2003, Mr. Wiley has been of counsel to the law firm Bingham McCutchen LLP. Previously, Mr. Wiley was of counsel to the law firm Schnader Harrison Goldstein & Manello and a partner of the law firms Goldstein & Manello and Fitch, Wiley, Richlin & Tourse, P.C. From his positions in business and law firms, Mr. Wiley brings expertise in law, legal matters and corporate governance combined with general management.

 

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

 

Board Independence.  Our Corporate Governance Principles provide that at least two-thirds of the members of our Board will be independent directors. The Board evaluates any relationships of each director and nominee with TJX and makes an affirmative determination whether or not each director and nominee is independent. To assist it in making its independence determination, the Board has adopted categorical standards, which are available on our website at www.tjx.com.

 

As part of the Board’s annual review of director independence, the Board considered the recommendation of our Corporate Governance Committee and reviewed transactions and relationships between each non-management director or any member of his or her immediate family and TJX. The purpose of this review was to determine whether relationships or transactions were inconsistent with a determination that the director was independent. As a result of this review, our Board unanimously determined that ten directors of our 12-member Board (83.3%) are independent, with the independent directors being José B. Alvarez, Alan M. Bennett, David A. Brandon, David T. Ching, Michael F. Hines, Amy B. Lane, John F. O’Brien, Robert F. Shapiro, Willow B. Shire and Fletcher H. Wiley. Each of these directors met our categorical standards of independence. Bernard Cammarata, as Chairman, and Carol Meyrowitz, as Chief Executive Officer and President, are employees of TJX. Mr. Shapiro is not standing for re-election at the Annual Meeting.

 

Integrity has been a core tenet of TJX since its inception. We seek to perform with the highest standards of ethical conduct and in compliance with all laws and regulations that relate to our businesses. We have Corporate Governance Principles, a Code of Conduct for our associates, a Code of Ethics for TJX Executives, written charters for our Board committees and a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics for Directors. The current versions of these documents and other items relating to our governance can be found at www.tjx.com.

 

Board’s Role in Risk Oversight.  It is management’s responsibility to manage risk and bring to the Board’s attention risks that are material to TJX. The Board has oversight responsibility for the systems established to report and monitor the most significant risks applicable to TJX. The Board administers its risk oversight role directly and through its committee structure, and the committees’ regular reports to the Board at Board meetings. The Board reviews strategic, financial and execution risks and exposures associated with the annual plan and multi-year plans, major litigation and other matters that may present material risk to the Company’s operations, plans, prospects or reputation, acquisitions and divestitures and senior management succession planning. The Audit Committee reviews risks associated with financial and accounting matters, including financial reporting, accounting, disclosure, internal controls over financial reporting, ethics and compliance programs, compliance with orders and data security. The Executive Compensation Committee reviews risks related to executive compensation and the design of compensation programs, plans and arrangements. The Corporate Governance Committee deals with risks related to performance evaluations and management succession. The Finance Committee is responsible for risks related to financing, investment, capital structure, liquidity, and investment performance, asset allocation strategies and funding of our benefit plans.

 

Board Expertise and Diversity.  We seek to have a Board that represents diversity as to experience, gender, race and ethnicity, but we do not have a formal policy with respect to diversity. We also seek a Board that reflects a range of talents, ages, skills, viewpoints, professional experience, educational background and expertise to provide sound and prudent guidance with respect to our operations and interests. All of our directors are financially literate, and three members of our Audit Committee are audit committee financial experts.

 

Board Annual Performance Reviews.  We have a comprehensive review process for evaluating the performance of our Board and our directors. Our Corporate Governance Committee oversees the annual performance evaluation of the entire Board, our Chairman, our Lead Director, each of our committees and its chair, and each of our individual directors.

 

Board Nominees.  The Corporate Governance Committee recommends to the Board individuals as director nominees who, in the opinion of the Corporate Governance Committee, have high personal and professional integrity, who have demonstrated ability, perspective and judgment and who will be effective, in conjunction with the other nominees to and members of the Board, in collectively serving the long-term best

interests of our stockholders. In evaluating the suitability of individual Board nominees, the Corporate Governance Committee takes into account many factors, including general understanding of disciplines relevant to the success of a large publicly traded company in today’s business environment, understanding of our business and industry, professional background and leadership experience, experience on the boards of other large publicly traded companies, personal accomplishment, and geographic, gender, age, ethnic and racial diversity. The Corporate Governance Committee evaluates each individual in the context of the Board as a whole, with the objective of recommending a group that can best perpetuate the success of our business and represent stockholder interests through the exercise of sound judgment using its diversity of experience. In addition, the Corporate Governance Committee considers, in light of our business, each director nominee’s experience, qualifications, attributes and skills that are identified in the biographical information contained under “Election of Directors.”

 

The Corporate Governance Committee’s process for identifying and evaluating candidates, including candidates recommended by stockholders, includes actively seeking to identify qualified individuals by various means which may include reviewing lists of possible candidates, such as chief executive officers of public companies or leaders of finance or other industries, considering proposals from sources, such as the Board of Directors, management, employees, stockholders and industry contacts, and engaging an outside search firm. The Corporate Governance Committee has adopted a policy with respect to submission by stockholders of candidates for director nominees which is available on our website at www.tjx.com. Any stockholder may submit in writing one candidate for consideration for each stockholder meeting at which directors are to be elected by not later than the 120th calendar day before the first anniversary of the date that we released our proxy statement to stockholders in connection with the previous year’s annual meeting. Recommendations should be sent to the Secretary of TJX, c/o Office of the Secretary of The TJX Companies, Inc., 770 Cochituate Road, Framingham, Massachusetts 01701. A recommendation must include specified information about, and consents and agreements of, the candidate. The Corporate Governance Committee evaluates candidates for the position of director recommended by stockholders or others in the same manner. The Corporate Governance Committee will determine whether to interview any candidates and may seek additional information about candidates from third-party sources.

 

Majority Voting.  Our by-laws provide for the election of directors in an uncontested election by a majority of the shares properly cast at the meeting. Our Corporate Governance Principles, available at www.tjx.com, require any nominee for director to provide an irrevocable contingent resignation, effective only if such director fails to receive the requisite majority vote in an uncontested election, and the Board accepts such resignation. Our Corporate Governance Principles provide procedures for the consideration of such resignation by the Board. Within 90 days of the date of the annual meeting of stockholders, the Board, with the recommendation of the Corporate Governance Committee, will act upon such resignation. In making its decision, the Board will consider the best interests of TJX and its stockholders, and take what it deems to be appropriate action. Such action may include accepting or rejecting the resignation or taking further measures to address those concerns that were the basis for the underlying stockholder vote.

 

Board Leadership Structure.  Our Board annually elects a Chairman of the Board of Directors. The Board has chosen to separate the roles of Chairman and Chief Executive Officer. Because our current Chairman, Bernard Cammarata, is not an independent director, consistent with our Corporate Governance Principles, our independent directors have elected a Lead Director, John F. O’Brien. In this role, among other duties, Mr. O’Brien meets at least quarterly with Carol Meyrowitz, our Chief Executive Officer, and with senior officers as necessary, attends quarterly management business review meetings, schedules meetings of the independent directors, presides at meetings of the Board at which the Chairman is not present, including meetings of the independent directors, serves as a liaison between the independent directors and the Chairman and Company management, approves meeting schedules and agendas, attends the meetings of each Board committee and undertakes other responsibilities designated by the independent directors. The Board believes that the separate roles of Mr. Cammarata, Ms. Meyrowitz and Mr. O’Brien are in the best interests of TJX and its stockholders. Mr. Cammarata has wide-ranging, in-depth knowledge of our business arising from his many years of service to TJX and, as a result, provides effective leadership for the Board and support for Ms. Meyrowitz and other management. Ms. Meyrowitz can devote her attention to leading TJX and focus on

its business strategy. Mr. O’Brien provides an appropriate level of independence in TJX’s Board leadership as provided in the Corporate Governance Principles through his review and approval of meeting agendas, his participation in management business review meetings and his leadership of the independent directors.

 

Attendance.  During fiscal 2010, our Board met 11 times. Each director attended at least 75% of all meetings of the Board and committees of which he or she was a member. At each regularly scheduled Board meeting, the independent directors met separately. It is our policy that all nominees and directors standing for re-election are expected to attend the annual meeting of stockholders. All nominees and directors attended the 2009 Annual Meeting.

 

Board Committees.  The Board of Directors has five standing committees: Audit, Corporate Governance, Executive, Executive Compensation and Finance. Each committee’s charter is available on our website at www.tjx.com.

 

All members of the Audit, Corporate Governance, Finance and Executive Compensation Committees are independent directors. While each committee has designated responsibilities, the committees act on behalf of the entire Board. The committees regularly report on their activities to the entire Board.

 

The table below provides information about these committees during fiscal 2010:

 

 

 

 

Audit Committee.  The Audit Committee is responsible for the annual appointment of the independent registered public accounting firm and oversight of the financial reporting process. Each member of the Audit Committee is a non-employee director and meets the independence standards adopted by the Board in compliance with New York Stock Exchange listing standards. The Audit Committee operates under the terms of a written charter which is reviewed by members of the committee annually. Specifically, the Audit Committee’s responsibilities include:

 

 

 

Executive Compensation Committee.  The Executive Compensation Committee, or the ECC, is responsible for overseeing executive compensation and benefits. Each member of the ECC is a non-employee director and meets the independence standards adopted by the Board in compliance with New York Stock Exchange listing standards. The ECC operates under the terms of a written charter which is reviewed by the members of the committee annually.

 

Specifically, the ECC’s responsibilities include:

 

 

The ECC also reviewed our compensation policies and practices for our employees to confirm that they do not give rise to risks which are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on the Company.

 

Corporate Governance Committee.  The Corporate Governance Committee is responsible for recommending nominees for directors to the Board and for our corporate governance practices. Each member of the Corporate Governance Committee is a non-employee director and meets the independence standards adopted by the Board in compliance with New York Stock Exchange listing standards. The Corporate Governance Committee operates under the terms of a written charter which is reviewed by the members of the committee annually. Specifically, the Corporate Governance Committee’s responsibilities include:

 

 

Executive Committee.  The Executive Committee meets at such times as it determines to be appropriate and has the authority to act for the Board on specified matters during the intervals between meetings of the Board.

Finance Committee.  The Finance Committee is responsible for reviewing and making recommendations to the Board relating to our financial activities and condition. The Finance Committee operates under the terms of a written charter which is reviewed by the members of the committee annually. Specifically, the Finance Committee’s responsibilities include:

 

 

Policies Relating to Directors.  It is our policy that no director shall be nominated who has attained the age of 75 prior to or on the date of his or her election or re-election. Under our Corporate Governance Principles, directors with full-time jobs should not serve on more than three boards of public companies in addition to our Board; no director should serve on more than four boards of public companies in addition to our Board; and members of the Audit Committee should not serve on more than two audit committees of other companies. When a director’s principal occupation or business association changes during his or her tenure as a director, our Corporate Governance Principles provide that the director is required to tender his or her resignation from the Board, and the Corporate Governance Committee will recommend to the Board any action to be taken with respect to the resignation.

 

Code of Conduct.  We have a Code of Conduct for our associates designed to ensure that our business is conducted with integrity. Our Code of Conduct covers professional conduct, including employment policies, conflicts of interest, intellectual property and the protection of confidential information, as well as adherence to laws and regulations applicable to the conduct of our business. Information concerning our Code of Conduct is available on our website at www.tjx.com.

 

Code of Ethics for TJX Executives and Code of Business Conduct and Ethics for Directors.  We have a Code of Ethics for TJX Executives governing our Chairman, Chief Executive Officer, President, Chief Financial Officer and other senior operating, financial and legal executives. The Code of Ethics for TJX Executives is designed to ensure integrity in our financial reports and public disclosures. We also have a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics for Directors which promotes honest and ethical conduct, compliance with applicable laws, rules and regulations and the avoidance of conflicts of interest. Both of these codes of conduct are published on our website at www.tjx.com. We intend to disclose any future amendments to, or waivers from, the Code of Ethics for TJX Executives or the Code of Business Conduct and Ethics for Directors within four business days of the waiver or amendment through a website posting or by filing a Current Report on Form 8-K with the Securities and Exchange Commission, or SEC.

 

Stock Ownership Guidelines.  Our Corporate Governance Principles provide that a director is expected to acquire initially at least $10,000 of our common stock outright and to attain stock ownership with a fair market value equal to at least four times the annual retainer paid to the directors within five years of initial election to the Board. Our Chief Executive Officer is expected to attain stock ownership with a fair market value equal to at least five times annual base compensation, and each Senior Executive Vice President is expected to attain stock ownership with a fair market value of at least three times annual base compensation. Such ownership guidelines for our executive officers are reduced by 50% at age 62. Executives are expected to make steady progress toward these ownership guidelines and to attain them within five years from their respective dates of hire for or promotion to the above positions. It is expected that executives who have not yet achieved these guidelines will retain 50% of their shares (on an after-tax basis) resulting from the exercise of stock options and vesting of deferred and restricted stock.

 

Sustainability.  As part of our commitment to corporate responsibility, TJX has long been pursuing solutions to sustainability challenges that both preserve natural resources and improve profitability. We

continue to be committed to environmentally sound business practices throughout our operations, including energy and water conservation as well as recycling and waste reduction. We have discussed our efforts with shareholder groups over the years and understand the importance to our business, shareholders, Associates, customers and communities of strong, sustainable business practices — including the value of aspirational targets to realize improved efficiencies over time. In response to interest voiced by our shareholders and Associates, we intend to publish a report prior to our 2011 Annual Meeting that reviews our company’s current sustainability initiatives as well as targets for future progress.

 

Communications with Directors.  Security holders and other interested parties may communicate directly with the Board, the non-management directors or the independent directors as a group, specified individual directors or the Lead Director by writing to such individual or group c/o Office of the Secretary, The TJX Companies, Inc., 770 Cochituate Road, Framingham, Massachusetts 01701. The Secretary will forward such communications to the relevant group or individual at or prior to the next meeting of the Board.

 

Requests for Information.  Stockholders may request print copies of our Corporate Governance Principles, Code of Conduct for Associates, Code of Ethics for TJX Executives, Code of Business Conduct and Ethics for Directors, and charters for our Audit, Corporate Governance, Executive, Executive Compensation and Finance Committees by writing to the Office of the Secretary at the above address. The current versions of these documents are also available on our website at www.tjx.com.

 

Transactions with Related Persons

 

Under the Corporate Governance Committee’s charter, the Committee is responsible for reviewing and approving or ratifying any transaction in which TJX and any of our directors, director nominees, executive officers, 5% stockholders and their immediate family members are participants and in which such persons have a direct or indirect material interest as provided under SEC rules. In the course of reviewing potential related person transactions, the Committee considers the nature of the related person’s interest in the transaction; the presence of standard prices, rates or charges or terms otherwise consistent with arms-length dealings with unrelated third parties; the materiality of the transaction to each party; the reasons for TJX entering into the transaction with the related person; the potential effect of the transaction on the status of a director as an independent, outside or disinterested director or committee member; and any other factors the Committee may deem relevant. Our General Counsel’s office is primarily responsible for the implementation of processes and procedures for screening potential transactions and providing information to the Corporate Governance Committee.

 

Audit Committee Report

 

We operate in accordance with a written charter adopted by the Board and reviewed annually by the Committee. We are responsible for overseeing the quality and integrity of TJX’s accounting, auditing and financial reporting practices. The Audit Committee is composed solely of members who are independent, as defined by the New York Stock Exchange and TJX’s Corporate Governance Principles. Further, the Board has determined that three of our members (Mr. Hines, Ms. Lane and Mr. Shapiro) are audit committee financial experts as defined by the rules of the SEC.

 

The Audit Committee met 10 times during fiscal 2010, including four meetings held with TJX’s Chief Financial Officer, Corporate Controller, Corporate Internal Audit and PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (PwC), TJX’s independent registered public accounting firm, prior to the public release of TJX’s quarterly and annual earnings announcements in order to discuss the financial information contained in the announcements.

 

We took numerous actions to discharge our oversight responsibility with respect to the audit process. We received the written disclosures and the letter from PwC pursuant to Rule 3526, Communication with Audit Committees Concerning Independence, of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (“PCAOB”) concerning any relationships between PwC and TJX and the potential effects of any disclosed relationships on PwC’s independence and discussed with PwC its independence. We discussed with management, the internal auditors and PwC, TJX’s internal control over financial reporting and management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting and the internal audit function’s organization,

responsibilities, budget and staffing. We reviewed with both PwC and our internal auditors their audit plans, audit scope and identification of audit risks.

 

We discussed and reviewed with PwC communications required by the Standards of the PCAOB (United States), as described in PCAOB AU Section 380, “Communication with Audit Committees,” and, with and without management present, discussed and reviewed the results of PwC’s examination of TJX’s financial statements. We also discussed the results of the internal audit examinations with and without management present.

 

The aggregate fees that TJX paid for professional services rendered by PwC for the fiscal years ended January 30, 2010 and January 31, 2009 were:

 

 

 

We pre-approve all audit services and all permitted non-audit services by PwC, including engagement fees and terms. We have delegated the authority to take such action between meetings to the Audit Committee chair, who reports the decisions made to the full Audit Committee at its next scheduled meeting.

 

Our policies prohibit TJX from engaging PwC to provide any services relating to bookkeeping or other services related to accounting records or financial statements, financial information system design and implementation, appraisal or valuation services, fairness opinions or contribution-in-kind reports, actuarial services, internal audit outsourcing, any management function, legal services or expert services not related to the audit, broker-dealer, investment adviser, or investment banking services or human resource consulting. In addition, we evaluate whether TJX’s use of PwC for permitted non-audit services is compatible with maintaining PwC’s independence. We concluded that PwC’s provision of non-audit services, which we approved in advance, was compatible with their independence.

 

We reviewed the audited financial statements of TJX as of and for the fiscal year ended January 30, 2010 with management and PwC. Management has the responsibility for the preparation of TJX’s financial statements, and PwC has the responsibility for the audit of those statements.

Based on these reviews and discussions with management and PwC, we recommended to the Board that TJX’s audited financial statements be included in its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 30, 2010 for filing with the SEC. We also have selected PwC as the independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal 2011, subject to ratification by TJX’s stockholders.

 

Audit Committee

 

Michael F. Hines, Chair

José B. Alvarez

David T. Ching

Amy B. Lane

Robert F. Shapiro

Fletcher H. Wiley

 

Beneficial Ownership

 

The following table shows as of April 12, 2010 the number of shares of our common stock beneficially owned by each director, each director nominee, each executive officer named in the Summary Compensation Table and all directors and executive officers as a group and the number of deferred shares held by each director:

 

 

 

 

As of April 12, 2010, based on information filed with the SEC, persons known by us to beneficially own 5% or more of our outstanding common stock are as follows:

 

 

 

 

Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance

 

Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, requires our directors and executive officers to file reports of holdings and transactions in our common stock with the SEC and the New York Stock Exchange. Based on our records and other information, all reports were timely filed.

 

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

 

Compensation Committee Report

 

We have reviewed and discussed the Compensation Discussion and Analysis with management. Based on these reviews and discussions, we recommended to the Board that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in this proxy statement and in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 30, 2010.

 

Executive Compensation Committee

 

David A. Brandon, Chair
José B. Alvarez
John F. O’Brien
Willow B. Shire

 

Compensation Discussion and Analysis

 

Executive Summary

 

We have a total compensation approach focused upon performance-based incentive compensation. Through our compensation program, we seek to:

 

 

Our compensation philosophy reflects pay for performance with incentive compensation comprising a substantial portion of each executive’s compensation opportunity. These incentives directly tie the amount of each named executive officer’s incentive compensation to objective performance achieved by TJX and its stock and thereby directly link executive compensation with the interests of our stockholders. We believe that this philosophy has contributed to our strong overall performance over many years. Our total stockholder return, for example, significantly exceeds the performance of the general market (S&P 500) and our industry index (Dow Jones U.S. Apparel Retailers Index) over the past one- and three-year periods.

 

Total Stockholder Return vs. Market and Retail Index

 

 

 

 

We entered fiscal 2010 faced with the challenges of a worldwide recession and established a three-pronged strategy for managing through the challenging economic times: conservatively plan same store sales, allowing better flow-through to the bottom line if we exceeded plans; run with very lean inventories and buy closer to need than in the past, increasing inventory turns and protecting gross margins; and focus on cost-cutting measures and controlling expenses. Implementing this strategy proved very successful, and we posted results significantly above our expectations and ahead of last year both on a consolidated basis and for each of our businesses. Our results also exceeded those of most other retailers, notwithstanding more challenging year-over-year comparisons than those that most other retailers faced. Customer traffic increased as the year progressed, driving sales. For fiscal 2010, same store sales increased 6% over the prior year, and net sales increased 7%, passing the $20 billion mark. Our diluted earnings per share from continuing operations of $2.84 for fiscal 2010 increased 37% over the prior fiscal year. Excluding items affecting comparability*, our earnings per share in fiscal 2010 increased 48% over the adjusted $1.92 in the prior year. Our earnings per share growth (compound growth, in the case of the three-year number) as compared to the peer group used by the Executive Compensation Committee is provided below. The fiscal 2010 compensation for our named executive officers reflects the extraordinary Company performance during fiscal 2010 in the face of these difficult economic conditions.

 

Earnings Per Share vs. Peer Group

 

 

 

 

Compensation Philosophy

 

The Executive Compensation Committee (ECC), a committee of our Board of Directors comprised of independent directors, has used the same compensation design for many years: total compensation competitive with our peers and weighted toward performance-based incentive compensation. Our short- and long-term incentive plans broadly cover key associates throughout our company, aligning the incentives of our named executive officers and these associates. Our incentives are also fully aligned with our divisional and corporate plans. These incentives directly link associate compensation, including our named executive officer compensation, with the interests of our stockholders by directly linking the amount of incentive compensation paid to the objective performance of TJX and its stock. Our incentive compensation plans also perform an important role in retention and succession planning.

 

 

Elements of Compensation

 

The elements of our executive compensation include:

 

 

In determining the overall level of executive compensation and the allocation of its components, the ECC considers various factors. The ECC reviews the performance of TJX as well as the individual performance of the executives, including both quantitative and qualitative performance factors. The Corporate Governance Committee provides the ECC with a review of the performance of our CEO for the year, including her achievement of performance objectives set by the Corporate Governance Committee in addition to those provided in our incentive plans, but does not make salary recommendations. The CEO provides reviews of the performance of the other named executive officers and makes recommendations on salary and other elements of compensation.

 

The ECC also reviews data from compensation consultants to assess the overall competitiveness of our compensation programs as well as of individual compensation. For fiscal 2010 compensation, the ECC reviewed survey data provided by the Hay Group, TJX’s compensation consultant, for all management-level employees including the named executive officers and peer group data provided by Frederic W. Cook & Co., Inc. (Cook), the ECC’s compensation consultant, with respect to the named executive officers. The ECC also receives input on other specific matters it requests from its compensation consultants.

 

The ECC considers the effects on retention and succession at the executive officer and other management levels of the levels and design of compensation. The ECC takes into account contractual obligations, historical compensation practices believed successful and the limitation on income tax deductions imposed by Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code (Section 162(m)). The ECC also considers matters such as recruitment, new hires, promotions, organizational changes, relocations and transitional roles.

 

The ECC uses all of this information to determine the overall level and appropriate mix of short-term versus long-term incentives and cash versus equity-based compensation to provide a competitive mix and at the same time encourage achievement of short and long-range goals and employee retention and succession. The ECC then separately determines individual compensation components at its various meetings throughout the year.

 

We provide retirement benefits, deferred compensation opportunities and limited perquisites. These help us maintain our competitive position and retain our executives but do not form part of the basis for the ECC’s consideration of an executive officer’s total compensation for any year.

 

Base Salary

 

Each of our named executive officers receives a base salary in cash during the fiscal year. Base salary contributes to our overall compensation approach by attracting and retaining talented individuals at a salary level that reflects the executive’s performance, experience and value in the marketplace. In response to the economic recession, management implemented a Company-wide expense reduction program for fiscal 2010 including elimination of merit salary increases across a majority of the Company for fiscal 2010. As a result, none of the named executive officers received base salary increases for fiscal 2010.

 

Incentive Compensation

 

A significant portion of each named executive officer’s compensation is equity-based and cash incentive compensation granted under awards requiring an increase in the value of our stock or achievement, at levels

specified by the ECC, based on performance measures approved by our stockholders. Our equity-based and cash incentive compensation for our named executive officers in fiscal 2010 was intended to qualify for an exemption from the deduction limitation rules of Section 162(m).

 

The ECC does not apply a formula in determining the portion of total compensation payable in the form of cash incentive compensation or equity-based compensation. However, starting in fiscal 2006, based on input from our stockholders and a review of our equity grant practices, the ECC reallocated compensation, reducing the number of stock options granted and increasing long-term cash incentive opportunities. Performance is certified by the ECC before any payments are made to our named executive officers under our cash incentive plans.

 

Short-Term Cash Incentives.  Our annual cash incentive awards are made under our Management Incentive Plan (MIP) and are designed to motivate our named executive officers and other key associates to achieve or exceed a performance target or targets for the fiscal year. Each MIP award has a target award opportunity based on achievement of this target. The amount of a MIP award is determined by measurement of actual performance against the performance target. If performance meets the performance target, participants receive their target MIP awards. If performance exceeds the performance target, participants are paid more than their target MIP awards based on the extent to which performance exceeds the performance targets (but not more than two times the target award, and not more than $5 million per award for any participant whose compensation is expected to be subject to the limits on deductibility under Section 162(m)). If performance does not meet the performance target, the MIP awards are not paid or are paid below their target awards, based on the extent to which performance falls below the performance targets. MIP performance targets, award opportunities and amounts payable at different levels of performance are pre-established by the ECC for the fiscal year.

 

Long-Term Cash Incentives.  Our long-term cash incentive awards are made under our Long Range Performance Incentive Plan (LRPIP) and are designed to motivate our named executive officers and other key associates to achieve or exceed cumulative multi-year performance targets. Each LRPIP award has a target award opportunity based on achievement of these targets. Like the MIP, the amount of LRPIP awards is determined by measurement of actual performance against the pre-established performance targets. Performance at target levels results in payment of the target LRPIP awards. If performance exceeds the performance targets, participants are paid more than their target LRPIP awards based on the extent to which performance exceeds the performance targets (but, under the terms of the LRPIP, not more than 150% of the target award, subject to a maximum of $5 million per award for any participant whose compensation is expected to be subject to the limits on deductibility under Section 162(m)). If performance does not meet the performance targets, LRPIP awards are not paid or are paid below their target awards, based on the extent to which performance falls below the performance targets. LRPIP performance targets, award opportunities and amounts payable at different levels of performance are pre-established by the ECC for each performance cycle.

 

Equity-Based Compensation.  Equity-based awards are made under our Stock Incentive Plan, or SIP. The ECC grants each stock option with an exercise price equal to the closing price of our common stock on the date of grant. Stock options do not deliver value unless the value of our stock appreciates and then only to the extent of such appreciation, thus linking the interests of our executive officers with those of our stockholders. Performance-based restricted stock awards vest only to the extent of achievement of the performance levels provided for those awards. Both stock options and performance-based restricted stock awards also have service-based vesting conditions that provide important retention incentives.

 

Other Elements of Compensation

 

Retirement Benefits.  All of our U.S.-based named executive officers participate in a broad-based pension plan for U.S. associates under which benefits accrue based on compensation and service. They are also eligible to participate in our 401(k) plan. Mr. Sweetenham, as a resident of the U.K., participates in a retirement plan for U.K. associates under which participants may defer earnings and receive an employer match and invest their funds to purchase benefits at retirement. We also maintain a Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan, or

SERP. Ms. Meyrowitz and Mr. Rossi participate in our primary SERP benefit program, and Mr. Naylor and Mr. Herrman participate in our alternative SERP benefit program.

 

Deferred Compensation.  Our named executive officers can defer compensation under our Executive Savings Plan, or ESP, an elective deferred compensation plan. Amounts deferred are notionally invested in mutual funds or other market investments. Participants in the ESP (other than those eligible for our primary SERP benefit) receive an employer match, subject to a vesting schedule, that is similarly notionally invested. Of our named executive officers in the U.S., Mr. Naylor and Mr. Herrman were eligible and elected to participate in ESP and receive this match.

 

Some of our named executive officers also have amounts previously deferred under our General Deferred Compensation Plan, or GDCP, now closed to new deferrals. Under this plan, deferrals are credited to an account that earns notional interest until distributed at an annually adjusted rate based on U.S. Treasury securities.

 

Perquisites.  In fiscal 2010, we provided a limited amount of perquisites and other personal benefits to our named executive officers, all of which are detailed in footnote 5 to the Summary Compensation Table below. These perquisites consisted of (i) an automobile benefit, (ii) financial and tax planning services, (iii) employer contributions or credits under our qualified and non-qualified savings plans, (iv) payment of life insurance premiums and (v) payment of legal fees associated with the negotiation of her employment agreement for Ms. Meyrowitz. None of these perquisites is grossed up for taxes. In addition, Mr. Sweetenham, a U.K. resident who works in both the U.K. and the U.S., received a U.S. housing benefit which was grossed up for U.S. taxes.

 

Fiscal 2010 Compensation

 

Fiscal 2010 Highlights.  With respect to fiscal 2010 compensation, in light of the world-wide economic recession, the ECC took the following actions to reflect the challenges facing TJX’s business during fiscal 2010:

 

 

Fiscal 2010 MIP.  The fiscal 2010 MIP performance target for corporate associates, including our named executive officers other than Mr. Sweetenham, was the sum of target levels of pre-tax income for each of our divisions, excluding capitalized inventory costs and results of T.K. Maxx in Poland and including intercompany interest income and expense (“adjusted pre-tax income”). The corporate MIP performance target was derived from our Board-approved plan for our divisions for the fiscal year. As a result, we believed when the ECC set the target that it was challenging but reasonably achievable.

 

The target MIP award opportunities (as a percentage of base salary) for our named executive officers for fiscal 2010 were: Ms. Meyrowitz, 100%; Mr. Herrman and Mr. Naylor, 55%; and Mr. Sweetenham and Mr. Rossi, 50%. For fiscal 2010, potential payout of these award opportunities ranged between 0% to 200% for performance ranging from 78% to 116% and above of the corporate performance target (except for

Mr. Sweetenham, whose potential payout was based on a blended corporate and TJX Europe performance target, as described below). For fiscal 2010, our performance under MIP compared to target was as follows:

 

Fiscal 2010 MIP

 

 

Our named executive officers other than Mr. Sweetenham earned fiscal 2010 MIP awards of 200% of their respective target awards. MIP awards for these executives were capped at 200% despite performance substantially ahead of the target award. These awards were calculated as follows:

 

 

Because of Mr. Sweetenham’s responsibilities for TJX Europe as well as other aspects of TJX’s business, Mr. Sweetenham’s award was based 60% on the TJX Europe target and 40% on the corporate target described above. TJX Europe’s MIP was paid at 175.01% of target. As a result, Mr. Sweetenham earned a fiscal 2010 MIP award of 185.01% of his target award.

 

Completion of Fiscal 2008-2010 LRPIP Award Cycle.  Fiscal 2010 completed the performance cycle for the fiscal 2008-2010 LRPIP awards. These award opportunities were based on adjusted pre-tax income targets for each of our divisions for the three fiscal years on a cumulative basis. Actual divisional performance for the cycle was compared to the target, resulting in a payout percentage for the divisional portion of the award according to a pre-established scale. This payout percentage was then adjusted for each division according to pre-established weightings which weight the results of the smaller divisions more heavily, designed to make performance at the smaller divisions more meaningful to the LRPIP award and thereby promote focus on their performance. The resulting divisional percentages were added together to determine the overall award. The LRPIP divisional performance targets for fiscal 2008-2010 were derived from our Board-approved plans for our divisions for the fiscal years at the time of grant. Because these performance targets reflected our plans for our divisions, we believed when the ECC set them that they were challenging but reasonably achievable.

Our named executive officers earned fiscal 2008-2010 LRPIP awards of 104.24% of their respective target awards. These awards were calculated as follows:

 

 

Grant of Fiscal 2010-2012 LRPIP Award Opportunities.  The ECC granted LRPIP award opportunities and established LRPIP performance goals for the fiscal 2010-2012 cycle. These award opportunities for our named executive officers were: Ms. Meyrowitz, $1,475,000 target and $2,212,500 maximum; Mr. Herrman and Mr. Naylor, $700,000 target and $1,050,000 maximum; Mr. Rossi, $375,000 target and $562,500 maximum; and Mr. Sweetenham, $437,113 target and $655,669 maximum. The minimum level for any payout was set at 33.33% of the performance targets, and the maximum payout level was set at 133.33% of the performance targets.

 

Grant of Performance-Based Restricted Stock Awards in Fiscal 2010.  The ECC granted performance-based restricted stock in fiscal 2010 to our named executive officers and determined the number of shares granted on the basis of the potential value of each grant. Ms. Meyrowitz’s performance-based restricted stock award was granted in connection with her new employment agreement entered into in March 2009, and the ECC was advised by Cook with respect to its terms. Although under SEC rules the value of the entire award is shown in the fiscal 2010 summary compensation table, Ms. Meyrowitz’s award was divided into two tranches, one for each of the two years of her employment agreement (150,000 shares in respect of fiscal 2010 service and performance, and 150,000 shares in respect of fiscal 2011 service and performance).

 

Ms. Meyrowitz’s performance-based restricted stock required performance resulting in a payout of at least 67% of the target corporate MIP awards for fiscal 2010 (which required that TJX achieve 90% of the adjusted pre-tax income reflected in the fiscal 2010 plan) for full vesting of the first half of the award, and requires performance resulting in a payout of at least 67% of the target corporate MIP awards for fiscal 2011 (which requires that TJX achieve 93% of the adjusted pre-tax income reflected in the fiscal 2011 plan) for full vesting of the other half of the award. The fiscal 2010 grants of performance-based restricted stock to our other named executive officers require performance resulting in a payout of at least 67% of the target LRPIP awards for fiscal 2010-2012 (which, as a result of the divisional weightings in the computation of the award, requires that TJX achieve 78% of the cumulative adjusted pre-tax income reflected in the fiscal 2010-2012 plan assuming that each division performs at the same level against its target performance) for vesting of the entire award. Performance below these target levels results in a pro rata reduction in the number of shares that would otherwise vest. Vesting of the performance-based restricted stock awards granted in fiscal 2010 is also subject to satisfaction of the service requirements specified in the awards. The ECC believes these awards perform an important retention function.

 

Grant of Stock Options in Fiscal 2010.  The ECC determined the number of stock options granted to our named executive officers and other associates in September 2009 by setting a fixed dollar value by executive and/or position and dividing this value by the stock price on the grant date. All options were granted with an exercise price equal to the closing stock price on the New York Stock Exchange on the grant date, and in general, have a maximum term of ten years, vest over three years and, to the extent vested, are exercisable for a limited period following termination of employment.

 

Fiscal 2010 Special Bonuses.  After we determined our fiscal 2010 results, the ECC made special awards to a broad group of associates across TJX to reflect the extraordinary Company performance during fiscal

2010 in the face of the challenging economic conditions. These awards were generally cash bonuses, but in the case of the named executive officers, were one-time, special grants of performance-based restricted stock awards intended to be exempt from the deduction limits of Section 162(m). The ECC granted the special awards to our named executive officers to reward their leadership in achieving this performance, taking into account, among other things, achievement of financial results at corporate and divisional levels substantially in excess of plan, the executives’ total compensation for the fiscal year after elimination of salary merit increases for fiscal 2010 and the related effects on compensation. These awards were as follows: Ms. Meyrowitz, 25,000 shares; Mr. Herrman, 11,000 shares; Mr. Naylor, Mr. Rossi and Mr. Sweetenham, each 7,000 shares. These awards are subject to performance-based and service-based vesting conditions. The performance-based vesting conditions would be satisfied if fiscal 2011 performance results in a payout of not less than 67% of the corporate MIP target for that year (which requires that we achieve 93% of the adjusted pre-tax income reflected in the fiscal 2011 plan).

 

Related Policies And Considerations

 

Employment Agreements.  Our named executive officers are parties to individual employment agreements that set their terms of employment, including compensation and benefits, as well as include certain termination and change of control provisions discussed below under “Severance and Change of Control Provisions.” Under the agreements, each named executive officer is entitled to a minimum level of base salary. For new employment agreements in fiscal 2010, minimum base salary was based on the level of base salary on the effective date of the agreement (except in the case of Mr. Sweetenham, as described below), consistent with our elimination of merit increases in fiscal 2010 across the majority of our Company. Our named executive officers are also entitled under their agreements to continue to be eligible to participate in specified benefit programs, including SIP, MIP and LRPIP, at levels commensurate with their positions and responsibilities and subject to the terms established by the ECC.

 

In January 2010, we entered into new employment agreements with Mr. Herrman, Senior Executive Vice President, Group President, Mr. Rossi, Senior Executive Vice President, Group President, and Mr. Sweetenham, Senior Executive Vice President, Group President, Europe that replaced each named executive officer’s then existing employment agreement with the Company. Each agreement was effective as of January 29, 2010 and, unless terminated earlier in accordance with its provisions, continues until January 28, 2012 for Mr. Rossi and until February 2, 2013 for Messrs. Herrman and Sweetenham. Under their new agreements, Mr. Herrman is entitled to a minimum annual base salary of $925,000, and Mr. Rossi is entitled to a minimum annual base salary of $700,000. Mr. Sweetenham’s new agreement provides for annual base salary starting in fiscal 2011 to be set in U.S. dollars, not less than $850,000, to be converted and payable in pounds sterling based on exchange rates in effect on specified determination dates (and to be further adjusted in Mr. Sweetenham’s favor to protect against a salary decrease in pounds sterling due to exchange rate fluctuations). In view of his continued service beyond age 65, Mr. Rossi is entitled under his new agreement to additional retirement benefit accruals based on his earnings and service after age 65 if more favorable than his primary benefit determined under existing SERP terms.

 

Severance and Change of Control Provisions.  During fiscal 2010, each of our named executive officers was party to an agreement that provided severance terms, including in connection with a change of control, and non-competition and non-solicitation undertakings. Provisions of these agreements relating to termination and change of control, and related provisions of the ESP and equity awards granted under our SIP, are summarized below under “Potential Payments upon Termination or Change of Control.” We provided these terms because we believe that it is important to define the relative obligations of TJX and our named executive officers, including obtaining protection against competition and solicitation, and that severance and change of control protections assist in attracting and retaining high quality executives and in keeping them focused on their responsibilities during any period in which a change of control may be contemplated or pending.

 

Stock Ownership Guidelines.  We have stock ownership guidelines that apply to all of our executive officers, which are summarized in more detail above under “Stock Ownership Guidelines” in the “Corporate Governance” section. These guidelines are designed to align our executives’ interests with those of our

stockholders and to encourage a long-term focus. Also, our policies prohibit our executives from engaging in hedging transactions with respect to TJX stock.

 

Tax and Accounting Considerations.  We structure U.S. incentive compensation arrangements to qualify as performance-based compensation exempt from the deduction limitations under Section 162(m), but we view the availability of a tax deduction as only one relevant consideration. We continue to emphasize performance-based compensation for executives and thus generally minimize the effect of Section 162(m). However, the ECC believes that its primary responsibility is to provide a compensation program that attracts, retains and rewards the executive talent necessary for our success. Consequently, the ECC authorizes compensation in excess of $1 million that is not performance-based.

 

Equity Grant Practices.  All of our equity awards are made under our stockholder-approved SIP. Virtually all of our stock options and other equity-based awards are granted at regularly scheduled ECC meetings held on approximately the same dates each year. The specific dates of the meetings are set by the Board, along with its determination of all regularly scheduled Board and committee meetings, generally about two years in advance. In limited circumstances, typically at regularly scheduled ECC meetings and in connection with new hires or promotions, the ECC approves or grants stock options and stock awards at other times during the year. The ECC does not have any programs, plans or practices of timing these equity grants in coordination with the release of material non-public information. The exercise price of each stock option grant is the closing stock price on the New York Stock Exchange on the grant date. The SIP prohibits, without stockholder approval, any repricing requiring stockholder approval under applicable NYSE rules.

 

Executive Compensation Committee Processes And Procedures

 

The ECC is responsible for overseeing executive compensation and benefits. The ECC has the authority, without Board or management approval, to retain and terminate its compensation consultants and to determine their fees and terms of engagement. In addition, the ECC may delegate its authority to a subcommittee and may establish formal procedures to govern its operation, as it deems appropriate.

 

The ECC reviews and approves compensation matters at various meetings during the year. The ECC generally acts as follows including with respect to our named executive officers (though this past year, the ECC conducted its annual review of executive compensation in September rather than in June):

 

 

Our named executive officers play a limited role in the executive compensation process. As described above, our Chief Executive Officer provides annual performance reviews of the other named executive officers and makes recommendations to the ECC regarding their base salaries and other elements of compensation. The ECC then considers those performance reviews and recommendations in establishing base salaries, cash incentive awards and equity grants.

 

Our named executive officers participate in our strategic planning process and recommend to the Board for its review and approval the annual and multi-year plans for TJX and its divisions. These plans are the basis for the MIP and LRPIP performance targets and the restricted stock performance criteria, all of which are

approved by the ECC. In addition, Mr. Herrman assisted the ECC in its administration of the various benefit and incentive plans and advised the ECC regarding the general design and structure of these plans. Mr. Cammarata, Ms. Meyrowitz, and Mr. Herrman regularly attended ECC meetings at the request of the ECC, although the ECC met in executive session at all regularly scheduled meetings.

 

Compensation Consultants and Benchmarking

 

During fiscal 2010, the ECC was advised by Cook and by Steven Hall & Partners (Hall), independent compensation consultants engaged by and reporting to the ECC. Neither Cook nor Hall performed any services for TJX other than work for the ECC. The level of Cook’s and Hall’s engagement and their respective fees were determined by the ECC. Cook advised the ECC with respect to the competitive positioning of base salary, annual bonus and long-term incentives for senior management, including our named executive officers, and Hall advised the ECC on certain retirement arrangements. During fiscal year 2010, the ECC also considered reports and survey data by the Hay Group (Hay), TJX’s compensation consultant, on company-wide incentive compensation.

 

For fiscal 2010, the ECC benchmarked total compensation of our named executive officers and each of the elements of that compensation against a group of 11 peer companies that are large, publicly traded retailers selected by the ECC:

 

Peer Group Companies

 

 

Substantially the same peer group has been used by the ECC over a number of years, and the ECC considers revisions each year to reflect changes in the peer group and TJX with the advice of the ECC’s compensation consultant and our management. In fiscal 2011, the ECC intends to undertake a comprehensive review of the composition of the peer group. Although the ECC uses peer group data to provide context for its own determinations, it does not target compensation or any element of compensation for our named executive officers by reference to any specified level at the peer group.

Summary Compensation Table

 

The following table provides information concerning compensation for our principal executive officer, our principal financial officer and our three other most highly paid executive officers during fiscal 2010 (collectively, our named executive officers):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total compensation for our named executive officers is composed of base salary, short-term and long-term cash incentives, long-term equity-based incentives, retirement benefits and limited perquisites. During fiscal 2010, each of our named executive officers had an employment agreement that provided for a base salary of not less than the amount of such officer’s base salary as of the effective date of the employment agreement. Our named executive officers were entitled under their employment agreements to participate in our SIP, MIP and LRPIP, and received cash and equity incentives only pursuant to these plans during fiscal 2010. Ms. Meyrowitz and Mr. Rossi participated in our primary SERP benefit and Mr. Herrman and Mr. Naylor participated in our alternative SERP benefit. Mr. Sweetenham, as a resident of the U.K., participates in a retirement plan for U.K. associates under which participants may defer earnings and receive an employer match. All of our U.S.-based named executive officers participated in our tax-qualified defined benefit plan and were eligible to make deferrals to our 401(k) plan and our ESP. Mr. Naylor and Mr. Herrman were eligible to receive, and received, matching contributions under the ESP during all or part of fiscal 2010. Our named executive officers received an automobile benefit and were entitled under their employment agreements to participation in fringe benefit plans and programs made available to executives generally. Mr. Sweetenham as a U.K. resident is entitled to U.S. housing and immigration benefits (with a related tax gross-up), as well as tax equalization and tax preparation assistance.

Grants of Plan-Based Awards in Fiscal 2010

 

The following table reports potential payouts under our incentive plans and all other stock and option awards that were granted during fiscal 2010 to our named executive officers:

 

 

 

 

Amounts above reflect short-term cash incentives granted under our MIP and long-term cash incentives granted under our LRPIP. Our MIP and LRPIP are discussed above in “Compensation Discussion and Analysis.”

 

In fiscal 2010, we granted all equity incentives, including stock options and performance-based restricted stock, under our SIP. Stock options generally have a maximum term of ten years, vest in equal annual installments over three years, upon a change of control and in the event of certain terminations of employment. In the event a named executive officer’s employment is terminated by reason of death, disability, or retirement at or after age 65 with five or more years of service, vested options generally remain exercisable for five years following termination, unless the option terminates on an earlier date pursuant to its terms. Following a retirement at or after age 65 with ten or more years of service, or a retirement at or after age 60 with twenty or more years of service, vested options generally remain exercisable for five years following termination and unvested options continue to vest for the three year period following retirement on the same basis as if the named executive officer had not retired and remain exercisable for an extended period, unless the option

terminates on an earlier date pursuant to its terms. In the event of any other termination, other than a termination for cause, vested options for our named executive officers generally remain exercisable for six months following termination (or such other period of up to three years as the ECC determines at or after the grant date), unless the option terminates on an earlier date pursuant to its terms. All options, whether or not then vested, are forfeited on a termination for cause.

 

The restricted stock awards, including the right to receive dividends on restricted stock granted in fiscal 2010, have both service-based and performance-based vesting conditions, except that awards fully vest upon a change of control and, for Ms. Meyrowitz, in the event of her death or disability. For performance-based restricted stock granted to our named executive officers in fiscal 2010, the service-based conditions are satisfied by continuous employment through the scheduled vesting date (or, for Ms. Meyrowitz, through the end of the fiscal year immediately preceding the vesting date), and the performance-based conditions are tied to the corporate performance target under our LRPIP (or, for Ms. Meyrowitz, under our MIP).

 

Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year End

 

The following table provides information on outstanding option and stock awards for named executive officers as of January 30, 2010:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Option Exercises and Stock Awards Vested during Fiscal 2010

 

The following table provides information relating to option exercises and stock award vesting of performance-based restricted stock for our named executive officers during fiscal 2010.

 

 

 

 

Pension Benefits

 

In the U.S., we have a tax-qualified defined benefit plan, or Retirement Plan, and a non-qualified Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan, or SERP. We do not have a policy of granting extra years of credited service for purposes of these plans. Our Retirement Plan was closed to new participants as of February 1, 2006, although participants employed prior to that date continue to accrue benefits. Consistent with industry practices, we have not offered primary SERP benefits to any new participants in a number of years and do not currently intend to do so in the future, although we continue to offer an alternative SERP benefit.

 

Under our Retirement Plan, participants accrue a benefit payable as an annuity at retirement or, if vested, on an earlier termination of employment. The amount accrued each year once participation commences after an initial one-year eligibility period, expressed as a life annuity commencing at age 65, is 1% of eligible compensation (base salary and MIP awards) up to a periodically adjusted limit ($90,000 in calendar 2009 and $94,000 in calendar 2010) and 1.4% of eligible compensation in excess of that limit. For years of service in excess of 35, the accrual rate is 1% per year of eligible compensation. Compensation in excess of another

periodically adjusted limit, currently $245,000, however, is disregarded for these purposes. Eligible participants are also entitled to supplemental credits. Benefits under the Retirement Plan vest, in general, after five years of service. A vested participant who retires or whose employment terminates prior to age 65 with at least ten years of service may elect to receive a reduced annuity benefit commencing at age 55 or later.

 

Under our SERP, the primary benefit provides participants who retire at or after age 55 with at least ten years of service a benefit equal to the value of an annuity commencing at age 65 providing annual payments up to a maximum of 50% of the participant’s final average earnings, less other employer-provided retirement benefits and social security benefits. This benefit, before offsets, accrues at the rate of 2.5% of final average earnings for each year of service not in excess of 20 until age 65. In determining final average earnings, the SERP includes base salary and MIP, but not LRPIP, and uses the highest average of five years over the preceding ten years. The primary SERP benefit is payable in installments, or in certain other forms of actuarially equivalent value. The alternative benefit provides participants whose Retirement Plan benefits are affected by Internal Revenue Service benefit restrictions, or deferrals under our nonqualified deferred compensation plans, with the amount of the benefits lost by reason of those restrictions or deferrals. Participants who are eligible for the primary benefit are eligible to receive the alternative benefit in lieu of the primary benefit if it provides a greater benefit at the time of retirement or other termination of employment.

 

The following table provides information on pension benefits for our named executive officers eligible for these benefits as of January 30, 2010 (as a U.K. resident, Mr. Sweetenham did not participate in these plans):

 

 

 

 

Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Plans

 

We have an Executive Savings Plan, or ESP, which is a nonqualified deferred compensation plan available to key employees. Under the ESP, our named executive officers and other eligible employees can elect to defer up to 20% of base salary and up to 100% of any MIP and LRPIP awards, our directors can elect to defer retainers and meeting fees, and our named executive officers not eligible for primary SERP benefits (including Mr. Herrman and Mr. Naylor) are eligible to receive matching credits on base salary deferrals of up to 10% of base salary. For calendar 2009, the potential match for these named executive officers was 10% (or, at age 50 or older and for up to 15 years, 25%) of their eligible deferrals, plus, if our MIP performance resulted in a

payout of at least 90% of the target corporate award opportunities for fiscal 2010, an additional match of up to 30% (or, at age 50 or older and for up to 15 years, up to 75%) of eligible deferrals. Based on our fiscal 2010 corporate MIP performance, the performance-based match was credited at the maximum level. Matching employer credits are 50% vested after five years of plan participation and are 100% vested after ten years of plan participation, at age 55, or upon a change of control or separation from service by reason of death or disability. All amounts deferred or credited to a participant’s account under the ESP are notionally invested in mutual funds or other investments available on the market. Although not required by the ESP, it is our practice to purchase the investments notionally invested under the participants’ accounts, thus realizing the actual return of the notional investments.

 

Under the ESP, amounts deferred are generally distributed upon termination of employment, unless the participant has elected an earlier distribution date, which may be no earlier than January 1st of the second year following the year of the deferral. Vested employer matching credits are distributed before age 55 upon death or separation from service due to disability, at age 55 if a participant has separated for any other reason, or upon a separation from service after age 55. Distributions are generally made in a lump sum payment; however, a participant may elect to be paid in annual installments over a period of not more than ten years in the event that his or her employment terminates after age 55. Amounts vested under the ESP prior to January 1, 2005 (and earnings on those amounts) can be distributed at the participant’s request prior to termination of employment in a lump sum distribution of 85% of the vested account, with the remaining 15% forfeited.

 

Through December 31, 2007, we offered eligible employees, including our named executive officers, and directors the opportunity to participate in the General Deferred Compensation Plan, or GDCP, another nonqualified deferred compensation plan. Under the GDCP, participants could defer all or a portion of base salary and MIP and LRPIP awards and, in the case of directors, retainers and meeting fees and be credited amounts on deferrals based on a rate for Treasury securities that is adjusted annually. For calendar 2009, this rate was 3.6%. No further deferrals were permitted beginning with fiscal 2009 compensation, but previously deferred amounts continue to be credited with interest amounts.

 

Amounts deferred under the GDCP on or after January 1, 2005 (and earnings on those amounts) that had not been distributed prior to January 1, 2009 are distributed under the terms of the ESP, as described above. Amounts deferred under the GDCP prior to January 1, 2005 (and earnings on those amounts credited prior to that date) are distributed in a lump sum at termination of service or upon an event or at a date (no later than the tenth anniversary of termination of service) and in a lump sum or in monthly installments as elected by the participant. Upon a change of control, each participant receives the entire amount credited to his deferred account in a lump sum payment.

 

The following table provides information on nonqualified deferred compensation plans for our named executive officers as of January 30, 2010, other than Mr. Sweetenham: