e10vq
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND
EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C.
20549
Form 10-Q
|
|
|
(Mark One)
|
|
|
þ
|
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
|
|
For the quarterly period ended
March 31,
2010
|
OR
|
o
|
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
Commission File Number 0-19311
BIOGEN IDEC INC.
(Exact name of registrant as
specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
|
|
33-0112644
|
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
|
14 Cambridge Center, Cambridge, MA 02142
(617) 679-2000
(Address, including zip code,
and telephone number, including
area code, of registrants principal executive
offices)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed
all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding
12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant
was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past
90 days: Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted
electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any,
every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of
Regulation S-T
during the preceding 12 months
(or for such shorter period that the registrant was
required to submit and post such
files): Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large
accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated
filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of
large accelerated filer, accelerated
filer and smaller reporting company in Rule
12b-2 of the
Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
|
|
|
Large
accelerated
filer þ
|
Accelerated
filer o
|
Non-accelerated
filer o
|
Smaller
reporting
company o
|
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company
(as defined in
Rule 12b-2
of the Exchange
Act): Yes o No þ
The number of shares of the issuers Common Stock,
$0.0005 par value, outstanding as of April 16, 2010,
was 266,998,007 shares.
BIOGEN
IDEC INC.
FORM 10-Q
Quarterly Report
For the Quarterly Period Ended March 31, 2010
TABLE OF CONTENTS
2
NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING
STATEMENTS
In addition to historical information, this report contains
forward-looking statements that are based on our current beliefs
and expectations. These forward-looking statements do not relate
strictly to historical or current facts and they may be
accompanied by such words as anticipate,
believe, estimate, expect,
forecast, intend, may,
plan, project, target,
will and other words and terms of similar meaning.
Reference is made in particular to forward-looking statements
regarding:
|
|
|
|
|
the anticipated level, mix and timing of future product sales,
royalty revenues or obligations, milestone payments, expenses,
liabilities, contractual obligations and amortization of
intangible assets;
|
|
|
|
the growth trends for TYSABRI and our ability to improve the
benefit-risk profile of TYSABRI;
|
|
|
|
the assumed remaining life of the core technology relating to
AVONEX;
|
|
|
|
ongoing development initiatives and growth strategies for our
marketed products;
|
|
|
|
competitive conditions and the development, timing and impact of
competitive products;
|
|
|
|
the incidence, timing, outcome and impact of litigation,
proceedings related to patents and other intellectual property
rights, tax assessments and other legal proceedings;
|
|
|
|
our effective tax rate for future periods;
|
|
|
|
the timing and impact of accounting standards;
|
|
|
|
the design, costs and timing of our clinical trials;
|
|
|
|
the timing and outcome of regulatory filings and meetings with
regulatory authorities.
|
|
|
|
the impact of healthcare reform in the U.S. and elsewhere;
|
|
|
|
our ability to finance our operations and source funding for
such activities;
|
|
|
|
the status, intended use and financial impact of our properties,
including our manufacturing facilities;
|
|
|
|
our share repurchase programs;
|
|
|
|
the drivers for growing our business; and
|
|
|
|
our plans to expend additional funds and resources on external
business development and research opportunities.
|
These forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties
that could cause actual results to differ materially from those
reflected in such forward-looking statements, including those
discussed in the Risk Factors section of this report
and elsewhere in this report. Forward-looking statements, like
all statements in this report, speak only as of the date of this
report, unless another date is indicated. Unless required by
law, we do not undertake any obligation to publicly update any
forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new
information, future events, or otherwise.
REFERENCES
Throughout this report, Biogen Idec, the
Company, we, us and
our refer to Biogen Idec Inc. and its consolidated
subsidiaries. References to RITUXAN refer to both
RITUXAN (the trade name for rituximab in the U.S., Canada and
Japan) and MabThera (the trade name for rituximab outside the
U.S., Canada and Japan), and ANGIOMAX refers to both
ANGIOMAX (the trade name for bivalirudin in the U.S., Canada and
Latin America) and ANGIOX (the trade name for bivalirudin in
Europe).
AVONEX®
and
RITUXAN®
are registered trademarks of Biogen Idec.
FUMADERMtm
is a common law trademark of Biogen Idec.
TYSABRI®
is a registered trademark of Elan Pharmaceuticals, Inc. The
following are trademarks of the respective companies listed:
ANGIOMAX®
and
ANGIOX®
The Medicines Company;
ARZERRAtm
Glaxo Group Limited;
COPAXONE®
Teva Pharmaceuticals Industries Limited;
REBIF®
Ares Trading, S.A.
3
PART I
FINANCIAL INFORMATION
BIOGEN
IDEC INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
(unaudited, in thousands,
except per share amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months
|
|
|
|
Ended March 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product
|
|
$
|
824,220
|
|
|
$
|
733,409
|
|
Unconsolidated joint business
|
|
|
254,928
|
|
|
|
278,818
|
|
Other
|
|
|
29,712
|
|
|
|
24,257
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
|
1,108,860
|
|
|
|
1,036,484
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs and expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of sales, excluding amortization of acquired intangible
assets
|
|
|
97,055
|
|
|
|
98,197
|
|
Research and development
|
|
|
307,030
|
|
|
|
279,478
|
|
Selling, general and administrative
|
|
|
248,664
|
|
|
|
221,830
|
|
Collaboration profit sharing
|
|
|
63,557
|
|
|
|
42,773
|
|
Amortization of acquired intangible assets
|
|
|
48,889
|
|
|
|
89,248
|
|
Acquired in-process research and development
|
|
|
39,976
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total costs and expenses
|
|
|
805,171
|
|
|
|
731,526
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from operations
|
|
|
303,689
|
|
|
|
304,958
|
|
Other income (expense), net
|
|
|
(8,386
|
)
|
|
|
6,846
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income tax expense
|
|
|
295,303
|
|
|
|
311,804
|
|
Income tax expense
|
|
|
75,310
|
|
|
|
65,225
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
219,993
|
|
|
|
246,579
|
|
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest, net of tax
|
|
|
2,551
|
|
|
|
2,592
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to Biogen Idec Inc.
|
|
$
|
217,442
|
|
|
$
|
243,987
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings per share attributable to Biogen Idec Inc.
|
|
$
|
0.80
|
|
|
$
|
0.85
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per share attributable to Biogen Idec Inc.
|
|
$
|
0.80
|
|
|
$
|
0.84
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average shares used in calculating:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings per share attributable to Biogen Idec Inc.
|
|
|
269,922
|
|
|
|
287,703
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per share attributable to Biogen Idec Inc.
|
|
|
272,703
|
|
|
|
289,744
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to these unaudited consolidated financial
statements.
4
(unaudited, in thousands,
except per share amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of March 31,
|
|
|
As of December 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
Current assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
639,559
|
|
|
$
|
581,889
|
|
Marketable securities
|
|
|
513,115
|
|
|
|
681,835
|
|
Accounts receivable, net
|
|
|
560,777
|
|
|
|
551,208
|
|
Due from unconsolidated joint business
|
|
|
205,228
|
|
|
|
193,789
|
|
Inventory
|
|
|
280,038
|
|
|
|
293,950
|
|
Other current assets
|
|
|
210,295
|
|
|
|
177,924
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
2,409,012
|
|
|
|
2,480,595
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Marketable securities
|
|
|
1,032,223
|
|
|
|
1,194,080
|
|
Property, plant and equipment, net
|
|
|
1,604,573
|
|
|
|
1,637,083
|
|
Intangible assets, net
|
|
|
1,822,133
|
|
|
|
1,871,078
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
1,138,621
|
|
|
|
1,138,621
|
|
Investments and other assets
|
|
|
210,761
|
|
|
|
230,397
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
8,217,323
|
|
|
$
|
8,551,854
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
|
Current liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
$
|
121,356
|
|
|
$
|
118,534
|
|
Taxes payable
|
|
|
108,972
|
|
|
|
75,891
|
|
Accrued expenses and other
|
|
|
432,887
|
|
|
|
500,755
|
|
Current portion of notes payable and line of credit
|
|
|
19,115
|
|
|
|
19,762
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
682,330
|
|
|
|
714,942
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes payable and line of credit
|
|
|
1,076,201
|
|
|
|
1,080,207
|
|
Long-term deferred tax liability
|
|
|
248,898
|
|
|
|
240,618
|
|
Other long-term liabilities
|
|
|
259,300
|
|
|
|
254,205
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
2,266,729
|
|
|
|
2,289,972
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies (Notes 13, 15 and 16)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, par value $0.001 per share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, par value $0.0005 per share
|
|
|
139
|
|
|
|
144
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
5,268,465
|
|
|
|
5,781,920
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income
|
|
|
22,872
|
|
|
|
50,496
|
|
Retained earnings
|
|
|
1,131,523
|
|
|
|
1,068,890
|
|
Treasury stock, at cost
|
|
|
(513,627
|
)
|
|
|
(679,920
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Biogen Idec Inc. shareholders equity
|
|
|
5,909,372
|
|
|
|
6,221,530
|
|
Noncontrolling interest
|
|
|
41,222
|
|
|
|
40,352
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shareholders equity
|
|
|
5,950,594
|
|
|
|
6,261,882
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and shareholders equity
|
|
$
|
8,217,323
|
|
|
$
|
8,551,854
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to these unaudited consolidated financial
statements.
5
(unaudited, in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months
|
|
|
|
Ended March 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Cash flows from operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
219,993
|
|
|
$
|
246,579
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash flows from
operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization of property, plant and equipment
and intangible assets
|
|
|
82,510
|
|
|
|
122,146
|
|
Acquired in-process research and development (Note 2)
|
|
|
39,976
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share-based compensation
|
|
|
51,006
|
|
|
|
37,889
|
|
Non-cash interest expense (income) and foreign exchange
remeasurement, net
|
|
|
3,982
|
|
|
|
(10,412
|
)
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
8,042
|
|
|
|
(6,973
|
)
|
Realized gain on sale of marketable securities and strategic
investments
|
|
|
(4,985
|
)
|
|
|
(4,313
|
)
|
Write-down of inventory to net realizable value
|
|
|
2,289
|
|
|
|
9,386
|
|
Impairment of marketable securities, investments and other assets
|
|
|
16,111
|
|
|
|
6,021
|
|
Excess tax benefit from share-based compensation
|
|
|
(4,379
|
)
|
|
|
(2,282
|
)
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
|
(20,201
|
)
|
|
|
(37,935
|
)
|
Due from unconsolidated joint business
|
|
|
(11,439
|
)
|
|
|
26,259
|
|
Inventory
|
|
|
12,264
|
|
|
|
(12,720
|
)
|
Other assets
|
|
|
(13,463
|
)
|
|
|
(14,264
|
)
|
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities
|
|
|
(82,854
|
)
|
|
|
(120,007
|
)
|
Other liabilities and taxes payable
|
|
|
38,043
|
|
|
|
61,376
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash flows provided by operating activities
|
|
|
336,895
|
|
|
|
300,750
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of marketable securities
|
|
|
(699,677
|
)
|
|
|
(1,110,368
|
)
|
Proceeds from sales and maturities of marketable securities
|
|
|
1,029,307
|
|
|
|
1,057,671
|
|
Acquisitions (Note 2)
|
|
|
(39,976
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
(38,209
|
)
|
|
|
(37,041
|
)
|
Purchases of other investments
|
|
|
(1,708
|
)
|
|
|
(31,959
|
)
|
Collateral received under securities lending
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29,991
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash flows provided by (used in) investing activities
|
|
|
249,737
|
|
|
|
(91,706
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase of treasury stock
|
|
|
(577,580
|
)
|
|
|
(57,631
|
)
|
Proceeds from issuance of stock for share-based compensation
arrangements
|
|
|
52,818
|
|
|
|
17,043
|
|
Change in cash overdraft
|
|
|
(1,826
|
)
|
|
|
1,369
|
|
Net contributions from noncontrolling interest
|
|
|
760
|
|
|
|
|
|
Excess tax benefit from share-based compensation
|
|
|
4,379
|
|
|
|
2,282
|
|
Repayment of borrowings
|
|
|
(2,011
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Obligation under securities lending
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(29,991
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash flows used in financing activities
|
|
|
(523,460
|
)
|
|
|
(66,928
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
63,172
|
|
|
|
142,116
|
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
(5,502
|
)
|
|
|
(397
|
)
|
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of the period
|
|
|
581,889
|
|
|
|
622,385
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, end of the period
|
|
$
|
639,559
|
|
|
$
|
764,104
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to these unaudited consolidated financial
statements.
6
BIOGEN
IDEC INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
(unaudited)
Overview
Biogen Idec is a global biotechnology company that creates new
standards of care in therapeutic areas with high unmet medical
needs. We currently have four marketed products: AVONEX,
RITUXAN, TYSABRI, and FUMADERM. Our marketed products are used
for the treatment of multiple sclerosis (MS), non-Hodgkins
lymphoma (NHL), rheumatoid arthritis (RA), Crohns disease,
chronic lymphocytic leukemia and psoriasis.
Basis
of Presentation
In the opinion of management, the accompanying unaudited
consolidated financial statements include all adjustments,
consisting of normal recurring accruals, necessary for a fair
presentation of our financial statements for interim periods in
accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States (U.S. GAAP). The information included in this
quarterly report on
Form 10-Q
should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial
statements and the accompanying notes included in our Annual
Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2009 (2009 Form 10-K).
Our accounting policies are described in the Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements in our 2009
Form 10-K
and updated, as necessary, in this
Form 10-Q.
The year-end consolidated balance sheet data presented for
comparative purposes was derived from audited financial
statements, but does not include all disclosures required by
U.S. GAAP. The results of operations for the three months
ended March 31, 2010 are not necessarily indicative of the
operating results for the full year or for any other subsequent
interim period.
Consolidation
Our consolidated financial statements reflect our financial
statements, those of our wholly-owned subsidiaries, certain
variable interest entities in which we are the primary
beneficiary and those of our joint ventures in Italy and
Switzerland, Biogen Dompé SRL and Biogen Dompé
Switzerland GmbH, respectively. For such consolidated entities
in which we own less than a 100% interest, we record net income
(loss) attributable to noncontrolling interest in our
consolidated statements of income equal to the percentage of the
economic or ownership interest retained in the collaborative
arrangement or joint venture by the respective noncontrolling
parties. All material intercompany balances and transactions
have been eliminated in consolidation.
In determining whether we are the primary beneficiary, we
consider a number of factors, including our ability to direct
the activities that most significantly affect the entitys
economic success, our contractual rights and responsibilities
under the arrangement and the significance of the arrangement to
each party. These considerations impact the way we account for
our existing collaborative and joint venture relationships and
may result in the future consolidation of companies or entities
with which we have collaborative or other arrangements.
Use of
Estimates
The preparation of consolidated financial statements in
accordance with U.S. GAAP requires management to make
estimates and judgments that may affect the reported amounts of
assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, and related
disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. On an on-going
basis, we evaluate our estimates and judgments, including those
related to revenue recognition and related allowances,
marketable securities, derivatives and hedging activities,
inventory, impairments of long-lived assets including intangible
assets, impairments of goodwill, the consolidation of variable
interest entities, income taxes including the valuation
allowance for deferred tax assets, valuation of investments,
research and development expenses,
7
BIOGEN
IDEC INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited,
continued)
contingencies and litigation, and share-based payments. We base
our estimates on historical experience and on various other
assumptions that are believed to be reasonable, the results of
which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying
values of assets and liabilities. Actual results may differ from
these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.
Subsequent
Events
We did not have any material recognizable subsequent events.
However, we did have the following nonrecognizable subsequent
event:
|
|
|
|
|
In April 2010, we announced that our Board of Directors
authorized the repurchase of up to $1.5 billion of our
common stock. We intend to retire these shares following
repurchase on the open market. This repurchase authorization
does not have an expiration date.
|
|
|
2.
|
Acquisitions
and Dispositions
|
Syntonix
Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
In connection with our acquisition of Syntonix Pharmaceuticals,
Inc. (Syntonix) in January 2007, we agreed to make additional
future consideration payments based upon the achievement of
certain milestone events associated with the development of
Syntonixs lead product, long-acting recombinant Factor IX,
a product for the treatment of hemophilia B. In January 2010, we
initiated patient enrollment in a registrational stage study for
Factor IX which resulted in the achievement of one of those
milestone events. As a result of the achievement of this
milestone, we paid approximately $40.0 million to the
former shareholders of Syntonix. As the Syntonix acquisition
occurred prior to our January 1, 2009 adoption of a new
accounting standard for business combinations, this acquisition
continues to be accounted for under previously issued guidance.
Accordingly, we recorded this payment as a charge to acquired
in-process research and development (IPR&D) within our
consolidated statement of income for the three months ended
March 31, 2010. Please read Note 2, Acquisitions
and Dispositions, to our Consolidated Financial Statements
included within our 2009
Form 10-K,
for a more detailed description of this acquisition.
We recognize revenue when all of the following criteria are met:
persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists; delivery has
occurred or services have been rendered; the sellers price
to the buyer is fixed or determinable; and collectability is
reasonably assured.
Product
Revenues
Revenues from product sales are recognized when title and risk
of loss have passed to the customer, which is typically upon
delivery. However, sales of TYSABRI in the U.S. are
recognized on the sell-through model, that is, upon
shipment of the product by Elan Pharma International, Ltd.
(Elan), an affiliate of Elan Corporation, plc, to its third
party distributor rather than upon shipment to Elan.
Product revenues are recorded net of applicable reserves for
trade term discounts, wholesaler incentives, Medicaid rebates,
Veterans Administration (VA) and Public Health Service (PHS)
discounts, managed care rebates, product returns and other
applicable allowances.
Revenues
from Unconsolidated Joint Business
We collaborate with the Roche Group, through its wholly-owned
member Genentech, Inc., on the development and commercialization
of RITUXAN. Revenues from unconsolidated joint business consist
of
8
BIOGEN
IDEC INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited,
continued)
(1) our share of pre-tax co-promotion profits in the U.S.;
(2) reimbursement of our selling and development expense in
the U.S.; and (3) revenue on sales of RITUXAN in the rest
of world, which consists of our share of pretax co-promotion
profits in Canada and royalty revenue on sales of RITUXAN
outside the U.S. and Canada by F. Hoffmann-La Roche
Ltd. (Roche) and its sublicensees. Pre-tax co-promotion profits
are calculated and paid to us by Genentech in the U.S. and
by Roche in Canada. Pre-tax co-promotion profits consist of
U.S. and Canadian sales of RITUXAN to third-party customers
net of discounts and allowances less the cost to manufacture
RITUXAN, third-party royalty expenses, distribution, selling and
marketing, and joint development expenses incurred by Genentech,
Roche and us. We record our royalty and co-promotion profits
revenue on sales of RITUXAN in the rest of world on a cash basis.
Royalty
Revenues
We receive royalty revenues on sales by our licensees of other
products covered under patents that we own. There are no future
performance obligations on our part under these license
arrangements. We record these revenues based on estimates of the
sales that occurred during the relevant period. The relevant
period estimates of sales are based on interim data provided by
licensees and analysis of historical royalties that have been
paid to us, adjusted for any changes in facts and circumstances,
as appropriate. We maintain regular communication with our
licensees in order to assess the reasonableness of our
estimates. Differences between actual royalty revenues and
estimated royalty revenues are adjusted for in the period in
which they become known, typically the following quarter.
Historically, adjustments have not been material when compared
to actual amounts paid by licensees. To the extent we do not
have sufficient ability to accurately estimate revenue, we
record revenues on a cash basis.
Milestone
Revenues
Under the terms of our collaboration agreement with Elan, once
sales of TYSABRI exceeded specific thresholds, Elan was required
to make milestone payments to us in order to continue sharing
equally in the collaborations results. These amounts,
recorded as deferred revenue upon receipt, are recognized as
revenue in our consolidated statements of income over the term
of the collaboration agreement based on a units of revenue
method whereby the revenue recognized is based on the ratio of
units shipped in the current period over the total units
expected to be shipped over the remaining term of the
collaboration.
Bad
Debt Reserves
Bad debt reserves are based on our estimated uncollectible
accounts receivable. Given our historical experiences with bad
debts, combined with our credit management policies and
practices, we do not presently maintain significant bad debt
reserves.
Reserves
for Discounts and Allowances
We establish reserves for trade term discounts, wholesaler
incentives, Medicaid rebates, VA and PHS discounts, managed care
rebates, product returns and other applicable allowances.
Reserves established for these discounts and allowances are
classified as reductions of accounts receivable (if the amount
is payable to our customer) or a liability (if the amount is
payable to a party other than our customer).
In addition, we distribute no-charge product to qualifying
patients under our patient assistance and patient replacement
goods program. This program is administered through one of our
distribution partners, who ships product for qualifying patients
from their own inventory purchased from us. Gross revenue and
the related reserves are not recorded on product shipped under
this program and cost of sales is recorded when the product is
shipped.
9
BIOGEN
IDEC INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited,
continued)
Product revenue reserves are categorized as follows: discounts,
contractual adjustments, and returns. An analysis of the amount
of, and change in, reserves is summarized as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contractual
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
Discounts
|
|
|
Adjustments
|
|
|
Returns
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Balance, as of December 31, 2009
|
|
$
|
13.9
|
|
|
$
|
70.3
|
|
|
$
|
18.9
|
|
|
$
|
103.1
|
|
Current provisions relating to sales in current year
|
|
|
19.4
|
|
|
|
59.5
|
|
|
|
4.8
|
|
|
|
83.7
|
|
Adjustments relating to prior years
|
|
|
(0.1
|
)
|
|
|
(3.6
|
)
|
|
|
(0.2
|
)
|
|
|
(3.9
|
)
|
Payments/returns relating to sales in current year
|
|
|
(8.6
|
)
|
|
|
(14.0
|
)
|
|
|
(0.5
|
)
|
|
|
(23.1
|
)
|
Payments/returns relating to sales in prior years
|
|
|
(8.5
|
)
|
|
|
(38.6
|
)
|
|
|
(3.5
|
)
|
|
|
(50.6
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, as of March 31, 2010
|
|
$
|
16.1
|
|
|
$
|
73.6
|
|
|
$
|
19.5
|
|
|
$
|
109.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The total reserves above, included in our consolidated balance
sheets, are summarized as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of
|
|
|
As of
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Reduction of accounts receivable
|
|
$
|
47.0
|
|
|
$
|
43.3
|
|
Current liability
|
|
|
62.2
|
|
|
|
59.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total reserves
|
|
$
|
109.2
|
|
|
$
|
103.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Healthcare
Reform
In March 2010, healthcare reform legislation was enacted in the
U.S. This legislation contains several provisions that
impact our business.
Although many provisions of the new legislation do not take
effect immediately, several provisions became effective in the
first quarter of 2010. These include (1) an increase in the
minimum Medicaid rebate to states participating in the Medicaid
program from 15.1% to 23.1% on our branded prescription drugs;
(2) the extension of the Medicaid rebate to Managed Care
Organizations that dispense drugs to Medicaid beneficiaries; and
(3) the expansion of the 340(B) Public Health Services drug
pricing program, which provides outpatient drugs at reduced
rates, to include additional hospitals, clinics, and healthcare
centers.
Beginning in 2011, the new law requires that drug manufacturers
provide a 50% discount to Medicare beneficiaries whose
prescription drug costs cause them to be subject to the Medicare
Part D coverage gap (i.e. the donut hole).
Also, beginning in 2011, we will be assessed our share of a new
fee assessed on all branded prescription drug manufacturers and
importers. This fee will be calculated based upon each
organizations percentage share of total branded
prescription drug sales to U.S. government programs (such
as Medicare, Medicaid and VA and PHS discount programs) made
during the previous year. The aggregated industry wide fee is
expected to total $28 billion through 2019, ranging from
$2.5 billion to $4.1 billion annually.
Presently, uncertainty exists as many of the specific
determinations necessary to implement this new legislation have
yet to be decided and communicated to industry participants. For
example, we do not yet know when and how discounts will be
provided to the additional hospitals eligible to participate
under the 340(B) program. In addition, determinations as to how
the Medicare Part D coverage gap will operate and how the
annual fee on branded prescription drugs will be calculated and
allocated remain to be clarified, though, as noted above, these
programs will not be effective until 2011. We have made several
estimates with regard to important assumptions relevant to
determining the financial impact of this legislation on our
business due to the lack of availability of both certain
information and complete understanding of how the process of
applying the legislation will be implemented.
10
BIOGEN
IDEC INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited,
continued)
Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market with cost
determined under the
first-in,
first-out (FIFO) method. Included in inventory are raw materials
used in the production of pre-clinical and clinical products,
which are charged to research and development expense when
consumed.
The components of inventories are summarized as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of
|
|
|
As of
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Raw materials
|
|
$
|
43.7
|
|
|
$
|
49.2
|
|
Work in process
|
|
|
155.7
|
|
|
|
174.0
|
|
Finished goods
|
|
|
80.6
|
|
|
|
70.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total inventory
|
|
$
|
280.0
|
|
|
|
294.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.
|
Intangible
Assets and Goodwill
|
Intangible
Assets
Intangible assets, net of accumulated amortization, impairment
charges and adjustments, are summarized as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of March 31, 2010
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
Estimated
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
Life
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Amortization
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Amortization
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
Out-licensed patents
|
|
|
12 years
|
|
|
$
|
578.0
|
|
|
$
|
(316.8
|
)
|
|
$
|
261.2
|
|
|
$
|
578.0
|
|
|
$
|
(306.0
|
)
|
|
$
|
272.0
|
|
Core developed technology
|
|
|
15-23 years
|
|
|
|
3,005.3
|
|
|
|
(1,510.4
|
)
|
|
|
1,494.9
|
|
|
|
3,005.3
|
|
|
|
(1,472.4
|
)
|
|
|
1,532.9
|
|
Trademarks and tradenames
|
|
|
Indefinite
|
|
|
|
64.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
64.0
|
|
|
|
64.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
64.0
|
|
In-licensed patents
|
|
|
14 years
|
|
|
|
3.0
|
|
|
|
(1.2
|
)
|
|
|
1.8
|
|
|
|
3.0
|
|
|
|
(1.1
|
)
|
|
|
1.9
|
|
Assembled workforce
|
|
|
4 years
|
|
|
|
2.1
|
|
|
|
(1.9
|
)
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
2.1
|
|
|
|
(1.8
|
)
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
Distribution rights
|
|
|
2 years
|
|
|
|
12.7
|
|
|
|
(12.7
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12.7
|
|
|
|
(12.7
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total intangible assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
3,665.1
|
|
|
$
|
(1,843.0
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,822.1
|
|
|
$
|
3,665.1
|
|
|
$
|
(1,794.0
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,871.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intangible assets were unchanged as of March 31, 2010 as
compared to December 31, 2009, exclusive of the impact of
amortization. Our most significant intangible asset is the core
technology related to our AVONEX product. The net book value of
this asset as of March 31, 2010 was $1,479.2 million.
For the three months ended March 31, 2010 compared to the
same period in 2009, amortization for acquired intangible assets
totaled $48.9 million and $89.2 million, respectively.
Goodwill
Goodwill remained unchanged as of March 31, 2010 as
compared to December 31, 2009. As of March 31, 2010,
we had no accumulated impairment losses.
11
BIOGEN
IDEC INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited,
continued)
|
|
6.
|
Fair
Value Measurements
|
In January 2010, we adopted a newly issued accounting standard
which requires additional disclosure about the amounts of and
reasons for significant transfers in and out of Level 1 and
Level 2 fair value measurements. This standard also
clarifies existing disclosure requirements related to the level
of disaggregation of fair value measurements for each class of
assets and liabilities and disclosures about inputs and
valuation techniques used to measure fair value for both
recurring and nonrecurring Level 2 and Level 3
measurements. As this newly issued accounting standard only
requires enhanced disclosure, the adoption of this standard did
not impact our financial position or results of operations. In
addition, effective for interim and annual periods beginning
after December 15, 2010, this standard will require
additional disclosure and require an entity to present
disaggregated information about activity in Level 3 fair
value measurements on a gross basis, rather than as one net
amount.
The tables below present information about our assets and
liabilities that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis
as of March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009 and
indicate the fair value hierarchy of the valuation techniques we
utilized to determine such fair value. In general, fair values
determined by Level 1 inputs utilize quoted prices
(unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or
liabilities. Fair values determined by Level 2 inputs
utilize data points that are observable, such as quoted prices,
interest rates and yield curves. Fair values determined by
Level 3 inputs utilize unobservable data points for the
asset or liability.
A majority of our financial assets and liabilities have been
classified as Level 2. Our financial assets and liabilities
(which include our cash equivalents, derivative contracts,
marketable debt securities, and plan assets for deferred
compensation) have been initially valued at the transaction
price and subsequently valued, at the end of each reporting
period, typically utilizing third party pricing services or
other market observable data. The pricing services utilize
industry standard valuation models, including both income and
market based approaches and observable market inputs to
determine value. These observable market inputs include
reportable trades, benchmark yields, credit spreads,
broker/dealer quotes, bids, offers, current spot rates and other
industry and economic events. We validate the prices provided by
our third party pricing services by reviewing their pricing
methods and matrices, obtaining market values from other pricing
sources, analyzing pricing data in certain instances and
confirming that the relevant markets are active. After
completing our validation procedures, we did not adjust or
override any fair value measurements provided by our pricing
services as of March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009.
Our strategic investments in publicly traded equity securities
are classified as Level 1 assets as their fair values are
readily determinable and based on quoted market prices.
Our venture capital investments represent investments in equity
securities of certain privately held biotechnology companies or
biotechnology oriented venture capital funds which primarily
invest in small privately-owned, venture-backed biotechnology
companies. These investments are the only assets for which we
used Level 3 inputs to determine the fair value and
represented approximately 0.3% of total assets as of
March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively.
The fair value of our investments in these venture capital funds
has been estimated using the net asset value of the fund. The
investments cannot be redeemed within the funds. Distributions
from each will be received as the underlying investments of the
fund are liquidated. The funds and therefore a majority of the
underlying assets of the funds will not be liquidated in the
near future. The underlying assets in these funds are initially
measured at transaction prices and
12
BIOGEN
IDEC INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited,
continued)
subsequently valued using the pricing of recent financing or by
reviewing the underlying economic fundamentals and liquidation
value of the companies. Gains and losses (realized and
unrealized) included in earnings for the period are reported in
other income (expense), net.
There have been no transfers of assets or liabilities between
the fair value measurement classifications.
The following tables set forth our financial assets and
liabilities that were recorded at fair value:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Significant
|
|
|
|
Balance as of
|
|
|
Quoted Prices in
|
|
|
Significant Other
|
|
|
Unobservable
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
Active Markets
|
|
|
Observable Inputs
|
|
|
Inputs
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
2010
|
|
|
(Level 1)
|
|
|
(Level 2)
|
|
|
(Level 3)
|
|
|
Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
532.7
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
532.7
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Marketable debt securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate debt securities
|
|
|
484.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
484.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
Government securities
|
|
|
853.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
853.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage and other asset backed securities
|
|
|
208.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
208.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
Strategic investments
|
|
|
30.8
|
|
|
|
30.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Venture capital investments
|
|
|
20.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20.8
|
|
Derivative contracts
|
|
|
35.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
Plan assets for deferred compensation
|
|
|
14.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
2,179.0
|
|
|
$
|
30.8
|
|
|
$
|
2,127.4
|
|
|
$
|
20.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative contracts
|
|
|
2.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
2.2
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
2.2
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13
BIOGEN
IDEC INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited,
continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Significant
|
|
|
|
Balance as of
|
|
|
Quoted Prices in
|
|
|
Significant Other
|
|
|
Unobservable
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
Active Markets
|
|
|
Observable Inputs
|
|
|
Inputs
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
2009
|
|
|
(Level 1)
|
|
|
(Level 2)
|
|
|
(Level 3)
|
|
|
Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
476.4
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
476.4
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Marketable debt securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate debt securities
|
|
|
504.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
504.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
Government securities
|
|
|
1,133.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,133.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage and other asset backed securities
|
|
|
238.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
238.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
Strategic investments
|
|
|
5.9
|
|
|
|
5.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Venture capital investments
|
|
|
21.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21.9
|
|
Derivative contracts
|
|
|
15.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
Plan assets for deferred compensation
|
|
|
13.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
2,409.5
|
|
|
$
|
5.9
|
|
|
$
|
2,381.7
|
|
|
$
|
21.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative contracts
|
|
|
11.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
11.1
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
11.1
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table provides a roll forward of the fair value of
our venture capital investments, where fair value is determined
by Level 3 inputs:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months
|
|
|
|
Ended March 31,
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Beginning balance, January 1
|
|
$
|
21.9
|
|
|
$
|
23.9
|
|
Total net unrealized losses included in earnings
|
|
|
(1.5
|
)
|
|
|
(0.3
|
)
|
Net purchases, issuances, and settlements
|
|
|
0.4
|
|
|
|
0.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance, March 31
|
|
$
|
20.8
|
|
|
$
|
24.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The fair and carrying value of our debt instruments are
summarized as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of March 31, 2010
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Credit line from Dompé
|
|
$
|
14.3
|
|
|
$
|
14.1
|
|
|
$
|
17.2
|
|
|
$
|
17.2
|
|
Notes payable to Fumedica
|
|
|
31.7
|
|
|
|
29.6
|
|
|
|
31.3
|
|
|
|
30.0
|
|
6.0% Senior Notes due 2013
|
|
|
486.4
|
|
|
|
449.7
|
|
|
|
475.7
|
|
|
|
449.6
|
|
6.875% Senior Notes due 2018
|
|
|
603.3
|
|
|
|
601.9
|
|
|
|
589.1
|
|
|
|
603.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
1,135.7
|
|
|
$
|
1,095.3
|
|
|
$
|
1,113.3
|
|
|
$
|
1,100.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The fair values of our credit line from Dompé and our note
payable to Fumedica were estimated using an income-based
approach with market observable inputs including current
interest and foreign currency exchange rates. The fair value of
our Senior Notes was determined through a market-based approach
using observable
14
BIOGEN
IDEC INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited,
continued)
and corroborated sources; within the hierarchy of fair value
measurements, these are classified as Level 2 fair values.
Marketable
Securities, including Strategic Investments
The following tables summarize our marketable securities and
strategic investments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Amortized
|
|
As of March 31, 2010 (In millions):
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Gains
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Available-for-sale
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate debt securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current
|
|
$
|
153.7
|
|
|
$
|
1.5
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
152.2
|
|
Non-current
|
|
|
330.3
|
|
|
|
4.5
|
|
|
|
(0.4
|
)
|
|
|
326.2
|
|
Government securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current
|
|
|
356.0
|
|
|
|
0.8
|
|
|
|
(0.1
|
)
|
|
|
355.3
|
|
Non-current
|
|
|
497.1
|
|
|
|
2.0
|
|
|
|
(0.4
|
)
|
|
|
495.5
|
|
Mortgage and other asset backed securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current
|
|
|
3.4
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.3
|
|
Non-current
|
|
|
204.8
|
|
|
|
4.0
|
|
|
|
(0.3
|
)
|
|
|
201.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
available-for-sale
securities
|
|
$
|
1,545.3
|
|
|
$
|
12.9
|
|
|
$
|
(1.2
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,533.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Strategic investments, non-current
|
|
$
|
30.8
|
|
|
$
|
2.0
|
|
|
$
|
(0.4
|
)
|
|
$
|
29.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Amortized
|
|
As of December 31, 2009 (In millions):
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Gains
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Available-for-sale
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate debt securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current
|
|
$
|
177.2
|
|
|
$
|
1.5
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
175.7
|
|
Non-current
|
|
|
326.9
|
|
|
|
5.7
|
|
|
|
(0.3
|
)
|
|
|
321.5
|
|
Government securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current
|
|
|
501.6
|
|
|
|
1.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
500.4
|
|
Non-current
|
|
|
631.9
|
|
|
|
4.1
|
|
|
|
(0.5
|
)
|
|
|
628.3
|
|
Mortgage and other asset backed securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current
|
|
|
3.0
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.9
|
|
Non-current
|
|
|
235.3
|
|
|
|
4.1
|
|
|
|
(0.5
|
)
|
|
|
231.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
available-for-sale
securities
|
|
$
|
1,875.9
|
|
|
$
|
16.7
|
|
|
$
|
(1.3
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,860.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Strategic investments, non-current
|
|
$
|
5.9
|
|
|
$
|
2.7
|
|
|
$
|
(0.3
|
)
|
|
$
|
3.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15
BIOGEN
IDEC INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited,
continued)
In the tables above, as of March 31, 2010 and
December 31, 2009, government securities included
$229.9 million and $298.8 million, respectively, of
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) guaranteed senior
notes issued by financial institutions under the Temporary
Liquidity Guarantee Program.
Certain commercial paper and short-term debt securities with
original maturities of less than 90 days are included in
cash and cash equivalents on the accompanying consolidated
balance sheets and are not included in the tables above. As of
March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, the commercial
paper, including accrued interest, had fair and carrying values
of $169.9 million and $76.9 million, respectively, and
short-term debt securities had fair and carrying values of
$362.8 million and $399.5 million, respectively.
Summary
of Contractual Maturities:
Available-for-Sale
Securities
The estimated fair value and amortized cost of securities,
excluding strategic investments,
available-for-sale
by contractual maturity are summarized as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of March 31, 2010
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
Estimated
|
|
|
Amortized
|
|
|
Estimated
|
|
|
Amortized
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Due in one year or less
|
|
$
|
454.0
|
|
|
$
|
451.8
|
|
|
$
|
522.0
|
|
|
$
|
519.5
|
|
Due after one year through five years
|
|
|
911.4
|
|
|
|
904.8
|
|
|
|
1,143.7
|
|
|
|
1,133.4
|
|
Due after five years
|
|
|
179.9
|
|
|
|
177.0
|
|
|
|
210.2
|
|
|
|
207.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
1,545.3
|
|
|
$
|
1,533.6
|
|
|
$
|
1,875.9
|
|
|
$
|
1,860.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The weighted average maturity of our marketable securities as of
March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, was
16 months and 15 months, respectively.
Proceeds
from Marketable Securities, excluding Strategic
Investments
The proceeds from maturities and sales of marketable securities,
excluding strategic investments, which were primarily
reinvested, and resulting realized gains and losses are
summarized as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months
|
|
|
Ended March 31,
|
(In millions)
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
Proceeds from maturities and sales
|
|
$
|
1,029.3
|
|
|
$
|
1,057.7
|
|
Realized gains
|
|
$
|
5.7
|
|
|
$
|
5.7
|
|
Realized losses
|
|
$
|
0.7
|
|
|
$
|
1.4
|
|
Realized losses for the three months ended March 31, 2010
primarily relate to the sale of agency mortgage-backed
securities. The realized losses for the three months ended
March 31, 2009 primarily relate to losses on the sale of
corporate debt securities and non-agency mortgage-backed
securities.
Impairments
Evaluating
Investments for
Other-than-Temporary
Impairments
We conduct periodic reviews to identify and evaluate each
investment that has an unrealized loss, in accordance with the
meaning of
other-than-temporary
impairment and its application to certain investments. An
unrealized loss exists when the current fair value of an
individual security is less than its amortized cost basis.
Unrealized losses on
available-for-sale
debt securities that are determined to be temporary, and not
related to credit loss, are recorded, net of tax, in accumulated
other comprehensive income.
16
BIOGEN
IDEC INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited,
continued)
For
available-for-sale
debt securities with unrealized losses, management performs an
analysis to assess whether we intend to sell or whether we would
more likely than not be required to sell the security before the
expected recovery of the amortized cost basis. Where we intend
to sell a security, or may be required to do so, the
securitys decline in fair value is deemed to be
other-than-temporary
and the full amount of the unrealized loss is recorded within
earnings as an impairment loss.
Regardless of our intent to sell a security, we perform
additional analysis on all securities with unrealized losses to
evaluate losses associated with the creditworthiness of the
security. Credit losses are identified where we do not expect to
receive cash flows sufficient to recover the amortized cost
basis of a security and are recorded within earnings as an
impairment loss.
For equity securities, when assessing whether a decline in fair
value below our cost basis is
other-than-temporary,
we consider the fair market value of the security, the duration
of the securitys decline, and the financial condition of
the issuer. We then consider our intent and ability to hold the
equity security for a period of time sufficient to recover our
carrying value. Where we have determined that we lack the intent
and ability to hold an equity security to its expected recovery,
the securitys decline in fair value is deemed to be
other-than-temporary
and is recorded within earnings as an impairment loss.
Recognition
and Measurement of
Other-than-Temporary
Impairment
For the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, we
recognized $15.8 million and $2.5 million,
respectively, in charges for the other-than-temporary impairment
of our publicly held strategic investments and investments in
privately-held
companies. The increase in the three months ended March 31,
2010 compared to the same period in 2009 was primarily the
result of AVEO Pharmaceuticals, Inc., one of our strategic
investments, executing an equity offering at an amount below our
cost basis.
For the three months ended March 31, 2009, we recognized
other-than-temporary
impairment charges of $3.6 million on our marketable debt
securities. No impairments were recognized related to our
marketable debt securities for the three months ended March 31,
2010.
|
|
8.
|
Derivative
Instruments
|
Our primary market exposure is to foreign exchange rates. We use
certain derivative instruments to help manage this exposure. We
execute these instruments with financial institutions we judge
to be creditworthy and the majority of the foreign currencies
are denominated in currencies of major industrial countries. We
do not hold or issue derivative instruments for trading or
speculative purposes.
We recognize all derivative instruments as either assets or
liabilities at fair value in our consolidated balance sheets. We
classify the cash flows from these instruments in the same
category as the cash flows from the hedged items.
Foreign
Currency Forward Contracts
Due to the global nature of our operations, portions of our
revenues are earned in currencies other than the
U.S. dollar. The value of revenues measured in
U.S. dollars is subject to changes in currency exchange
rates. In order to mitigate these changes we use foreign
currency forward contracts to lock in exchange rates.
Foreign currency forward contracts in effect as of
March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009 had remaining
durations of 1 to 9 months. These contracts have been
designated as cash flow hedges and accordingly, to the extent
effective, any unrealized gains or losses on these foreign
currency forward contracts are reported in accumulated other
comprehensive income (loss). Realized gains and losses for the
effective portion of such contracts are recognized in revenue
when the sale of product in the currency being hedged is
recognized. To
17
BIOGEN
IDEC INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited,
continued)
the extent ineffective, hedge transaction gains and losses are
reported in other income (expense), net at each reporting date.
The notional value of foreign currency forward contracts that
were entered into to hedge forecasted revenue are summarized as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notional Amount
|
|
Foreign Currency: (In millions)
|
|
As of March 31, 2010
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2009
|
|
|
Euro
|
|
$
|
481.4
|
|
|
$
|
495.9
|
|
Canadian Dollar
|
|
|
37.3
|
|
|
|
22.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
518.7
|
|
|
$
|
518.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The portion of the fair value of these foreign currency forward
contracts that was included in accumulated other comprehensive
income (loss) within total equity reflected net gains of
$32.0 million and $1.2 million as of March 31,
2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively. We consider the
impact of our and our counterparties credit risk on the
fair value of the contracts as well as the ability of each party
to execute its obligations under the contract. As of
March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively,
credit risk did not materially change the fair value of our
forward contracts.
In relation to our foreign currency forward contracts, we
recognize gains and losses in earnings due to hedge
ineffectiveness. During the three months ended March 31,
2010, we recognized a net gain of $0.1 million. During the
three months ended March 31, 2009, we recognized a net loss
of $2.5 million. In addition, we recognized
$0.2 million of gains in product revenue for the settlement
of certain effective cash flow hedge forward contracts for the
three months ended March 31, 2010 as compared to losses
recognized in the amount of $3.1 million during the three
months ended March 31, 2009. These settlements were
recorded in the same period as the related forecasted revenue.
Summary
of Derivatives Designated as Hedging Instruments
The following table summarizes the fair value and presentation
in the consolidated balance sheets for derivatives designated as
hedging instruments as of March 31, 2010 and
December 31, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign Currency Forward Contracts
|
|
|
|
Asset Derivatives
|
|
|
Liability Derivatives
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
Balance Sheet Location
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Balance Sheet Location
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
March 31, 2010
|
|
|
Other Current Assets
|
|
|
$
|
33.9
|
|
|
|
Accrued Expenses and Other
|
|
|
$
|
2.2
|
|
December 31, 2009
|
|
|
Other Current Assets
|
|
|
$
|
10.8
|
|
|
|
Accrued Expenses and Other
|
|
|
$
|
9.8
|
|
18
BIOGEN
IDEC INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited,
continued)
The following table summarizes the effect of derivatives
designated as hedging instruments on the consolidated statements
of income for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and
2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recognized in
|
|
|
|
Reclassified from
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income
|
|
Income
|
|
Income
|
|
Income
|
|
Amount of
|
|
|
on Derivative
|
|
Statement
|
|
into Income
|
|
Statement
|
|
Gain/(Loss)
|
|
|
Gain/(Loss)
|
|
Location
|
|
Gain/(Loss)
|
|
Location
|
|
Recorded
|
(In millions)
|
|
(Effective Portion)
|
|
(Effective Portion)
|
|
(Effective Portion)
|
|
(Ineffective Portion)
|
|
(Ineffective Portion)
|
|
For the Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency contracts
|
|
$
|
32.0
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
$
|
0.2
|
|
|
Other income (expense)
|
|
$
|
0.1
|
|
March 31, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency contracts
|
|
$
|
(12.8
|
)
|
|
Revenue
|
|
$
|
(3.1
|
)
|
|
Other income (expense)
|
|
$
|
(2.5
|
)
|
Other
Derivatives
We enter into foreign currency forward contracts, with one month
durations, to mitigate the foreign currency risk related to
certain balance sheet items. We have not elected hedge
accounting for these transactions. As of March 31, 2010,
the aggregate notional amount of our outstanding foreign
currency contracts was $184.2 million. The fair value of
these contracts was a net gain of $1.0 million. Net gains
of $5.2 million related to these contracts were recognized
as a component of other income (expense), net, in the three
months ended March 31, 2010. As this program commenced
subsequent to March 31, 2009, no gains or losses were
recognized related to these types of contracts for the three
months ended March 31, 2009.
|
|
9.
|
Property,
Plant and Equipment
|
Property, plant and equipment are recorded at historical cost,
net of accumulated depreciation. Accumulated depreciation on
property, plant and equipment was $671.9 million at
March 31, 2010 and $642.5 million at December 31,
2009.
We own or lease real estate primarily consisting of buildings
that contain research laboratories, office space, and biologic
manufacturing operations, some of which are located in markets
that are experiencing high vacancy rates and decreasing property
values. If we decide to consolidate, co-locate or dispose of
certain aspects of our business operations, for strategic or
other operational reasons, we may dispose of one or more of our
properties. Due to reduced expectations of product demand,
improved yields on production and other factors, we may not
fully utilize our manufacturing facilities at normal levels
resulting in idle time at facilities or substantial excess
manufacturing capacity. We are always evaluating our current
strategy, as well as other alternatives, including whether to
delay completion of a manufacturing facility in Denmark. If any
of our owned properties are held for sale and we determine that
the fair value of the properties is lower than their book value,
we may not realize the full investment in these properties and
incur significant impairment charges. In addition, if we decide
to fully or partially vacate a leased property, we may incur
significant costs, including lease termination fees, rent
expense in excess of sublease income and impairment of leasehold
improvements.
19
BIOGEN
IDEC INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited,
continued)
The following tables reflect the activity in comprehensive
income included within equity attributable to the shareholders
of Biogen Idec, equity attributable to noncontrolling interests,
and total shareholders equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months
|
|
|
For the Three Months
|
|
|
|
Ended March 31, 2010
|
|
|
Ended March 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
Biogen Idec
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Biogen Idec
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
Shareholders
|
|
|
Noncontrolling
|
|
|
Shareholders
|
|
|
Shareholders
|
|
|
Noncontrolling
|
|
|
Shareholders
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
Comprehensive income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
217.4
|
|
|
$
|
2.6
|
|
|
$
|
220.0
|
|
|
$
|
244.0
|
|
|
$
|
2.6
|
|
|
$
|
246.6
|
|
Unrealized (losses) gains on investments
|
|
|
(2.9
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2.9
|
)
|
|
|
2.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.0
|
|
Unrealized gains on foreign currency forward contracts
|
|
|
27.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27.9
|
|
|
|
28.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28.1
|
|
Unfunded status of pension and post-retirement benefit plans
|
|
|
(0.1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.1
|
)
|
|
|
(0.1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.1
|
)
|
Translation adjustments
|
|
|
(52.4
|
)
|
|
|
(2.6
|
)
|
|
|
(55.0
|
)
|
|
|
(51.3
|
)
|
|
|
2.1
|
|
|
|
(49.2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income (loss)
|
|
$
|
189.9
|
|
|
$
|
0.0
|
|
|
$
|
189.9
|
|
|
$
|
222.7
|
|
|
$
|
4.7
|
|
|
$
|
227.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized holding gains (losses) on investments are shown net
of tax of $1.7 million and $1.2 million for the three
months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively.
Unrealized gains on foreign currency forward contracts are shown
net of tax of $3.0 million, and $3.1 million for the
three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively.
The unfunded status of pension and post-retirement benefit plans
is shown net of tax as of March 31, 2010 and 2009. Tax
amounts in both years were immaterial.
The following table reconciles equity attributable to
noncontrolling interest:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months
|
|
|
|
Ended March 31,
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Noncontrolling interest, January 1
|
|
$
|
40.4
|
|
|
$
|
27.9
|
|
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest
|
|
|
2.6
|
|
|
|
2.6
|
|
Translation adjustments
|
|
|
(2.6
|
)
|
|
|
2.1
|
|
Distributions to noncontrolling interest
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital contributions from noncontrolling interest
|
|
|
0.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noncontrolling interest, March 31
|
|
$
|
41.2
|
|
|
$
|
32.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total distributions to us from our joint ventures were
negligible for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and
2009.
20
BIOGEN
IDEC INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited,
continued)
Basic and diluted earnings per share are calculated as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months
|
|
|
|
Ended March 31,
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Numerator:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to Biogen Idec
|
|
$
|
217.4
|
|
|
$
|
244.0
|
|
Adjustment for net income allocable to preferred shares
|
|
|
(0.4
|
)
|
|
|
(0.4
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income used in calculating basic and diluted earnings per
share
|
|
$
|
217.0
|
|
|
$
|
243.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding
|
|
|
269.9
|
|
|
|
287.7
|
|
Effect of dilutive securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock options and employee stock purchase plan
|
|
|
1.1
|
|
|
|
0.7
|
|
Time-vested restricted stock units
|
|
|
1.7
|
|
|
|
1.3
|
|
Market stock units
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Performance-vested restricted stock units settled in shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dilutive potential common shares
|
|
|
2.8
|
|
|
|
2.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares used in calculating diluted earnings per share
|
|
|
272.7
|
|
|
|
289.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following amounts were not included in the calculation of
net income per diluted share because their effects were
anti-dilutive:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months
|
|
|
|
Ended March 31,
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Numerator:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income allocable to preferred shares
|
|
$
|
0.4
|
|
|
$
|
0.4
|
|
Denominator:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock options
|
|
|
5.0
|
|
|
|
7.3
|
|
Time-vested restricted stock units
|
|
|
0.7
|
|
|
|
2.4
|
|
Market stock units
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Performance-vested restricted stock units
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
Convertible preferred stock
|
|
|
0.5
|
|
|
|
0.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
6.2
|
|
|
|
10.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21
BIOGEN
IDEC INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited,
continued)
Share-based
Compensation Expense
The following table summarizes share-based compensation expense
included within our consolidated statements of income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months
|
|
|
|
Ended March 31,
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Research and development
|
|
$
|
16.7
|
|
|
$
|
16.3
|
|
Selling, general and administrative
|
|
|
36.2
|
|
|
|
23.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal
|
|
|
52.9
|
|
|
|
39.5
|
|
Capitalized share-based payment costs
|
|
|
(0.9
|
)
|
|
|
(1.6
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share-based compensation expense included in total costs and
expenses
|
|
|
52.0
|
|
|
|
37.9
|
|
Income tax effect
|
|
|
(16.7
|
)
|
|
|
(11.6
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share-based compensation expense included in net income
attributable to Biogen Idec
|
|
$
|
35.3
|
|
|
$
|
26.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table summarizes share-based compensation expense
associated with each of our share-based compensation programs:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months
|
|
|
|
Ended March 31,
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Stock options
|
|
$
|
10.8
|
|
|
$
|
5.2
|
|
Market stock units
|
|
|
3.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
Time-vested restricted stock units
|
|
|
33.5
|
|
|
|
31.5
|
|
Performance-vested restricted stock units settled in shares
|
|
|
2.4
|
|
|
|
1.2
|
|
Performance-vested restricted stock units settled in cash
|
|
|
1.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employee stock purchase plan
|
|
|
1.6
|
|
|
|
1.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal
|
|
$
|
52.9
|
|
|
$
|
39.5
|
|
Capitalized share-based payment costs
|
|
|
(0.9
|
)
|
|
|
(1.6
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share-based compensation expense included in total costs and
expenses
|
|
$
|
52.0
|
|
|
$
|
37.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock
Options
In the first quarter of 2010, approximately 120,000 stock
options were granted with a weighted average exercise price of
$57.38 and weighted average grant date fair value of $15.62. In
the first quarter of 2009, approximately 825,000 stock options
were granted with a weighted average exercise price of $49.51
and weighted average grant date fair value of $17.72. The fair
values of our stock option grants are estimated as of the date
of grant using the Black-Scholes option valuation model. The
estimated fair values of the stock options, including the effect
of estimated forfeitures, are then expensed over the
options requisite service period, which is typically the
vesting period.
22
BIOGEN
IDEC INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited,
continued)
Market
Stock Units and Cash Settled Performance Shares
Beginning in the first quarter of 2010, we revised our long term
incentive program to include two new forms of equity-based
compensation awards to certain employees: restricted stock units
which will vest based on stock price performance, referred to as
Market Stock Units (MSUs) and performance-vested restricted
stock units which will be settled in cash, referred to as Cash
Settled Performance Shares (CSPSs). We will apply forfeiture
rate assumptions to these types of awards similar to those
utilized by us when accounting for our other share-based
compensation programs.
Market
Stock Units
In the first quarter of 2010, approximately 333,000 MSUs were
granted with a weighted average grant date fair value of $61.87.
MSU awards vest in four equal annual increments beginning on the
anniversary of the grant date. The vesting of these awards is
subject to the respective employees continued employment.
The number of MSUs reflected as granted represents the target
number of units that are eligible to be earned based on the
attainment of certain market-based criteria involving our stock
price. The number of MSUs earned is calculated at each annual
anniversary from the date of grant over the respective vesting
periods, resulting in multiple performance periods. Participants
may ultimately earn between 0% and 150% of the target number of
units granted based on actual stock performance. Accordingly,
additional MSUs may be issued or currently outstanding MSUs may
be cancelled upon final determination of the number of awards
earned.
We have valued the granted MSUs using a lattice model with a
Monte Carlo simulation. This valuation methodology utilizes
several key assumptions, including the 60 calendar day average
closing stock price on grant date, expected volatility of our
stock price, risk-free rates of return and expected dividend
yield. The assumptions used in our valuation are summarized as
follows:
|
|
|
Expected dividend yield
|
|
0%
|
Range of expected stock price volatility
|
|
28.60% - 36.48%
|
Range of risk-free rates of return
|
|
0.37% - 1.98%
|
60 calendar day average closing stock price on grant date
|
|
$54.12
|
We apply a graded vesting expense methodology when accounting
for MSUs. The probability of actual shares expected to be earned
is considered in the grant date valuation, therefore the expense
will not be adjusted to reflect the actual units earned.
Cash
Settled Performance Shares
In the first quarter of 2010, approximately 370,000 CSPSs were
granted. CSPS awards vest in three equal annual increments
beginning on the anniversary of the grant date. The vesting of
these awards is subject to the respective employees
continued employment. The number of CSPSs reflected as granted
in 2010 represents the target number of units that are eligible
to be earned based on the attainment of certain performance
measures established at the beginning of the performance period,
which ends December 31, 2010. Participants may ultimately
earn between 0% and 200% of the target number of units granted
based on the degree of actual performance metric achievement.
Accordingly, additional CSPSs may be issued or currently
outstanding CSPSs may be cancelled upon final determination of
the number of units earned. CSPSs are settled in cash based on
the 60 calendar day average closing stock price through each
vesting date once the actual vested and earned number of units
is known.
We apply a graded vesting expense methodology when accounting
for the CSPSs and the fair value of the liability is remeasured
at the end of each reporting period through expected cash
settlement. Compensation expense associated with CSPS awards is
based upon the stock price and the number of units expected to
be
23
BIOGEN
IDEC INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited,
continued)
earned after assessing the probability that certain performance
criteria will be met and the associated targeted payout level
that is forecasted will be achieved, net of estimated
forfeitures. Cumulative adjustments are recorded each quarter to
reflect changes in the stock price and estimated outcome of the
performance-related conditions until the date results are
determined and settled.
Time-Vested
Restricted Stock Units
The fair values of our time-vested restricted stock units (RSUs)
are based on the market value of our stock on the date of grant
and are recognized over the applicable service period, adjusted
for the effect of estimated forfeitures. In the first quarter of
2010, approximately 1.6 million RSUs were granted with a
weighted average grant date fair value of $55.28. In the first
quarter of 2009, approximately 2.3 million RSUs were
granted with a weighted average grant date fair value of $49.33.
Performance-Vested
Restricted Stock Units
In the first quarter of 2010, approximately 4,000
performance-vested restricted stock units (PVRSUs) were granted
with a weighted average grant date fair value of $53.64. The
PVRSUs granted in 2010 are subject to the attainment of certain
performance criteria established at the beginning of the
performance period, which ends December 31, 2010. In the
first quarter of 2009, approximately 307,000 PVRSUs were granted
with a weighted average grant date fair value of $49.50. The
number of PVRSUs earned was subject to the attainment of certain
performance criteria during 2009. Based on our 2009 performance,
99% of the granted PVRSUs were earned. These awards vest in
three equal increments on (1) the later of the first
anniversary of the grant date or the date of results
determination; (2) the second anniversary of the grant
date; and (3) the third anniversary of the grant date, and
are also subject to the respective employees continued
employment.
We apply a graded vesting expense methodology when accounting
for our PVRSUs. Compensation expense associated with PVRSU
awards is initially based upon the number of shares expected to
vest after assessing the probability that certain performance
criteria will be met and the associated targeted payout level
that is forecasted will be achieved, net of estimated
forfeitures. Cumulative adjustments are recorded quarterly to
reflect subsequent changes in the estimated outcome of
performance-related condition until the date results are
determined.
Employee
Stock Purchase Plan
The purchase price of common stock under the employee stock
purchase plan (ESPP) is equal to 85% of the lower of
(i) the market value per share of the common stock on the
participants entry date into an offering period or
(ii) the market value per share of the common stock on the
purchase date. However, for each participant whose entry date is
other than the start date of the offering period, the amount
shall in no event be less than the market value per share of the
common stock as of the beginning of the related offering period.
The fair value of the discounted purchases made under the ESPP
is calculated using the Black-Scholes model. The fair value of
the look-back provision plus the 15% discount is recognized as
compensation expense over the purchase period. We apply a graded
vesting approach since our ESPP provides for multiple purchase
periods and is, in substance, a series of linked awards.
For the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009,
approximately 200,000 shares of common shares were issued in
each period, under our ESPP.
CEO
Retirement
On January 4, 2010, we announced that James C. Mullen will
retire as our President and Chief Executive Officer on
June 8, 2010 and that we entered into a transition
agreement with Mr. Mullen. Under the terms of the
agreement, we agreed with Mr. Mullen, amongst other
provisions, to vest all of Mr. Mullens then-unvested
24
BIOGEN
IDEC INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited,
continued)
equity awards on the date of his retirement and allow
Mr. Mullen to exercise his vested stock options until
June 8, 2013 or their expiration, whichever is earlier. The
modifications to Mr. Mullens existing stock options,
RSUs and PVRSUs resulted in an incremental charge of
approximately $18.6 million, which will be recognized
evenly over the requisite service period as per the terms of the
transition agreement.
Tax
Rate
For the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, our
effective tax rates were 25.5% and 21.0%, respectively. The
increase in our tax rate for the three months ended
March 31, 2010 compared to the same period in 2009 was
primarily a result of the expiration of the federal research and
development tax credit at the end of 2009 and, in the first
quarter of 2009, a favorable change in certain state tax laws.
As a result of the 2009 changes in tax law we reduced our first
quarter 2009 tax expense by $30.2 million. The federal
research and development tax credit had a 1.6% favorable impact
on our effective tax rate for first quarter of 2009. The
unfavorable impact of not having these benefits recur in 2010
was partially offset by a higher percentage of our profits being
earned in lower rate international jurisdictions. This change is
caused by lower 2010 domestic earnings, as a proportion of total
consolidated earnings due to the recently enacted U.S.
healthcare reform legislation, the growth in our international
operations and a reorganization of our international operations.
During 2010, we also had a favorable impact from a statutory
increase in the U.S. manufacturers tax deduction.
Reconciliation between the U.S. federal statutory tax rate
and our effective tax rate is summarized as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months
|
|
|
|
Ended March 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Statutory rate
|
|
|
35.0
|
%
|
|
|
35.0
|
%
|
State taxes
|
|
|
1.9
|
|
|
|
(1.1
|
)
|
Taxes on foreign earnings
|
|
|
(9.8
|
)
|
|
|
(5.8
|
)
|
Credits and net operating loss utilization
|
|
|
(1.6
|
)
|
|
|
(9.4
|
)
|
Purchased intangible assets
|
|
|
1.5
|
|
|
|
1.6
|
|
IPR&D
|
|
|
0.8
|
|
|
|
1.1
|
|
Permanent items
|
|
|
(1.6
|
)
|
|
|
(1.1
|
)
|
Other
|
|
|
(0.7
|
)
|
|
|
0.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effective tax rate
|
|
|
25.5
|
%
|
|
|
21.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounting
for Uncertainty in Income Taxes
We and our subsidiaries are routinely examined by various taxing
authorities. We file income tax returns in the U.S. federal
jurisdiction, and various states and foreign jurisdictions. With
few exceptions, we are no longer subject to U.S. federal
tax examination for years before 2007 or state, local, or
non-U.S. income
tax examinations by tax authorities for years before 2001.
In 2006, the Massachusetts Department of Revenue (DOR) issued a
Notice of Assessment against Biogen Idec MA Inc. for
$38.9 million of corporate excise tax for 2002, which
includes associated interest and penalties. The assessment
asserts that the portion of sales attributable to Massachusetts,
the computation of Biogen Idec MAs research and
development credits and the availability of certain claimed
deductions were not appropriate, resulting in unpaid taxes for
2002. In December 2006, we filed an abatement application
25
BIOGEN
IDEC INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited,
continued)
with the DOR, seeking abatement for
2001-2003,
which was denied. In July 2007, we filed a petition with the
Massachusetts Appellate Tax Board, seeking among other items,
abatements of corporate excise tax for
2001-2003
and adjustments in certain credits and credit carryforwards for
2001-2003.
We anticipate that the hearing will take place in 2010. In the
fourth quarter of 2009, the DOR completed its audit fieldwork of
our 2004, 2005 and 2006 tax filings. The DOR may make an
assessment for taxes, interest, and penalties claiming that our
computation and deductions for these periods were also
inappropriate. We believe that positions taken in our tax
filings are valid and we intend to contest this matter
vigorously.
Our tax filings for 2007 and 2008 have not yet been audited by
the DOR but have been prepared in a manner consistent with prior
filings which may result in an assessment for those years. Due
to tax law changes effective January 1, 2009, the
computations and deductions at issue in previous tax filings
will not be part of our tax filings starting in 2009.
There is a possibility that we may not prevail in defending all
of our assertions with the DOR. If these matters are resolved
unfavorably in the future, the resolution could have a material
adverse impact on our future effective tax rate and our results
of operations.
|
|
14.
|
Other
Income (Expense), Net
|
Components of other income (expense), net, are summarized as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months
|
|
|
|
Ended March 31,
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Interest income
|
|
$
|
8.9
|
|
|
$
|
14.8
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(8.3
|
)
|
|
|
(9.9
|
)
|
Impairments of investments (Note 7)
|
|
|
(15.8
|
)
|
|
|
(6.1
|
)
|
Net realized gains on foreign currency transactions
|
|
|
1.0
|
|
|
|
3.0
|
|
Net realized gains on marketable securities
|
|
|
5.0
|
|
|
|
4.3
|
|
Other, net
|
|
|
0.8
|
|
|
|
0.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other income (expense), net
|
|
$
|
(8.4
|
)
|
|
$
|
6.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15.
|
Investments
in Variable Interest Entities
|
Effective January 1, 2010, we adopted a newly issued
accounting standard which provides guidance for the
consolidation of variable interest entities and requires an
enterprise to determine whether its variable interest or
interests give it a controlling financial interest in a variable
interest entity. This amended consolidation guidance for
variable interest entities replaces the existing quantitative
approach for identifying which enterprise should consolidate a
variable interest entity, which was based on which enterprise is
exposed to a majority of the risks and rewards, with a
qualitative approach, based on which enterprise has both
(1) the power to direct the economically significant
activities of the entity and (2) the obligation to absorb
losses of, or the right to receive benefits from, the entity
that could potentially be significant to the variable interest
entity. The adoption of this standard did not have an impact on
our financial position or results of operations. Determination
about whether an enterprise should consolidate a variable
interest entity is required to be evaluated continuously as
changes to existing relationships or future transactions may
result in us consolidating or deconsolidating our partner(s) to
collaborations and other arrangements.
26
BIOGEN
IDEC INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited,
continued)
Consolidated
Variable Interest Entities
Our consolidated financial statements include the financial
results of variable interest entities in which we are the
primary beneficiary.
Investments
in Joint Ventures
We consolidate the operations of Biogen Dompé SRL and
Biogen Dompé Switzerland GmbH, our respective sales
affiliates in Italy and Switzerland, as we retain the
contractual power to direct the activities of these entities
which most significantly and directly impact their economic
performance. The activity of each of these joint ventures is
significant to our overall operations. The assets of these joint
ventures are restricted, from the standpoint of Biogen Idec, in
that they are not available for our general business use outside
the context of each joint venture. The holders of the
liabilities of each joint venture, including the credit line
from Dompe described in our 2009
Form 10-K,
have no recourse to Biogen Idec.
Included within our consolidated balance sheet at March 31,
2010 are total joint venture assets and liabilities of
$111.5 million and $26.9 million, respectively, the
most significant of which are accounts receivable from the
ordinary course of business of $102.3 million.
We have provided no financing to these joint ventures other than
previously contractually required amounts.
Neurimmune
We have a collaboration agreement with Neurimmune SubOne AG
(Neurimmune), a subsidiary of Neurimmune Therapeutics AG, for
the development and commercialization of antibodies for the
treatment of Alzheimers disease. Neurimmune conducts
research to identify potential therapeutic antibodies and we are
responsible for the development, manufacturing and
commercialization of all products. We may pay Neurimmune up to
$360.0 million in remaining milestone payments, as well as
royalties on sales of any resulting commercial products.
We have determined that we are the primary beneficiary of
Neurimmune because we control the activities of the
collaboration and are required to fund 100% of the research
and development costs incurred in support of the collaboration
agreement. As such, we consolidate the results of Neurimmune.
The assets and liabilities of Neurimmune are not significant as
it is a research and development organization. Amounts that we
reimburse Neurimmune for research and development expense
incurred in support of the collaboration are reflected in
research and development expense in our consolidated statements
of income.
A summary of activity related to this collaboration is as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months
|
|
|
|
Ended March 31,
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Milestone payments made to Neurimumune
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
5.0
|
|
Total development expense incurred by the collaboration
|
|
$
|
5.1
|
|
|
$
|
1.8
|
|
Total expense reflected within our consolidated statements of
income
|
|
$
|
5.1
|
|
|
$
|
6.8
|
|
We have provided no financing to Neurimmune other than
previously contractually required amounts.
Cardiokine
We collaborate with Cardiokine Biopharma LLC (Cardiokine), a
subsidiary of Cardiokine Inc., on the joint development of
Lixivaptan, an oral compound for the potential treatment of
hyponatremia in patients
27
BIOGEN
IDEC INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited,
continued)
with congestive heart failure. Based upon our current
development plans, we may pay up to $125.0 million in
remaining development milestone payments, as well as royalties
on commercial sales under the terms of our collaboration
agreement.
We have determined that we are the primary beneficiary of
Cardiokine because we control the activities of the
collaboration and are required to fund 90% of the
development costs under the collaboration agreement. As such, we
consolidate the results of Cardiokine. The assets and
liabilities of Cardiokine are not significant as it is a
research and development organization. Amounts that we reimburse
Cardiokine for research and development expense incurred in
support of the collaboration are reflected in research and
development expense in our consolidated statements of income.
A summary of activity related to this collaboration is as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months
|
|
|
|
Ended March 31,
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Milestone payments made to Cardiokine
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Total development expense incurred by the collaboration
|
|
$
|
17.4
|
|
|
$
|
13.7
|
|
Total Biogen Idecs share of expense reflected within our
consolidated statements of income
|
|
$
|
15.7
|
|
|
$
|
12.3
|
|
Collaboration expense allocated to noncontrolling interests, net
of tax
|
|
$
|
1.7
|
|
|
$
|
1.4
|
|
We have provided no financing to Cardiokine other than
previously contractually required amounts.
Unconsolidated
Variable Interest Entities
We have relationships with other variable interest entities
which we do not consolidate as we lack the power to direct the
activities that significantly impact the economic success of
these entities. These relationships include investments in
certain biotechnology companies and research collaboration
agreements.
At March 31, 2010 the total carrying value of our
investments in biotechnology companies that we have determined
to be variable interest entities is $23.4 million. Our
maximum exposure to loss related to these variable interest
entities is limited to the carrying value of our investments.
We have entered into research collaborations with certain
variable interest entities where we are required to share or
fund certain development activities. These development
activities are included in research and development expense
within our consolidated statements of income, as they are
incurred. Depending on the collaborative arrangement, we may
record funding receivables or payable balances with our
partners, based on the nature of the cost-sharing mechanism and
activity within the collaboration. At March 31, 2010 we
have recorded a receivable of $5.6 million related to a
cost sharing arrangement with one of our collaborative
relationships.
We have provided no financing to these variable interest
entities other than previously contractually required amounts.
Along with several other major pharmaceutical and biotechnology
companies, Biogen, Inc. (now Biogen Idec MA Inc., one of our
wholly-owned subsidiaries) or, in some cases, Biogen Idec Inc.,
was named as a defendant in lawsuits filed by the City of New
York and numerous Counties of the State of New York. All of the
cases except for cases filed by the County of Erie,
County of Oswego and County of Schenectady (Three County
Actions) are the subject of a Consolidated
Complaint, first filed on September 15, 2005 in
28
BIOGEN
IDEC INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited,
continued)
the U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts
in Multi-District Litigation No. 1456 (MDL proceedings).
The complaints allege that the defendants (i) fraudulently
reported (or caused others to report incorrectly) the Average
Wholesale Price for certain drugs for which Medicaid provides
reimbursement (Covered Drugs); (ii) marketed and promoted
the sale of Covered Drugs to providers based on the
providers ability to collect inflated payments from the
government and Medicaid beneficiaries that exceeded payments
possible for competing drugs; (iii) provided financing
incentives to providers to over-prescribe Covered Drugs or to
prescribe Covered Drugs in place of competing drugs; and
(iv) overcharged Medicaid for illegally inflated Covered
Drugs reimbursements. Among other things, the complaints allege
violations of New York state law and advance common law claims
for unfair trade practices, fraud, and unjust enrichment. In
addition, the amended Consolidated Complaint alleges that the
defendants failed to accurately report the best
price on the Covered Drugs to the Secretary of Health and
Human Services pursuant to rebate agreements, and excluded from
their reporting certain discounts and other rebates that would
have reduced the best price. With respect to the MDL
proceedings, some of the plaintiffs claims were dismissed,
and the parties, including Biogen Idec, began a mediation of the
outstanding claims on July 1, 2008. We have not formed an
opinion that an unfavorable outcome is either
probable or remote in any of these
cases, and do not express an opinion at this time as to their
likely outcome or as to the magnitude or range of any potential
loss. We believe that we have good and valid defenses to each of
these complaints and are vigorously defending against them.
In 2006, the Massachusetts Department of Revenue (DOR) issued a
Notice of Assessment against Biogen Idec MA Inc. for
$38.9 million of corporate excise tax for 2002, which
includes associated interest and penalties. On December 6,
2006, we filed an abatement application with the DOR, seeking
abatements for 2001, 2002 and 2003. The abatement application
was denied on July 24, 2007. On July 25, 2007, we
filed a petition with the Massachusetts Appellate Tax Board,
seeking, among other items, abatements of corporate excise tax
for 2001, 2002 and 2003 and adjustments in certain credits and
credit carryforwards for 2001, 2002 and 2003. Issues before the
Board include the computation of Biogen Idec MAs sales
factor for 2001, 2002 and 2003, computation of Biogen Idec
MAs research credits for those same years, and the
availability of deductions for certain expenses and partnership
flow-through items. We anticipate that the hearing will take
place in 2010. We intend to contest this matter vigorously.
On October 27, 2008, Sanofi-Aventis Deutschland GmbH
(Sanofi) filed suit against Genentech and Biogen Idec in federal
court in Texas (E.D. Tex.) (Texas Action) claiming that RITUXAN
and certain other Genentech products infringe U.S. Patents
5,849,522 (522 patent) and 6,218,140 (140 patent).
Sanofi seeks preliminary and permanent injunctions, compensatory
and exemplary damages, and other relief. On October 27,
2008, Genentech and Biogen Idec filed a complaint against
Sanofi, Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC, and Sanofi-Aventis U.S.,
Inc. in federal court in California (N.D. Cal.) (California
Action) seeking a declaratory judgment that RITUXAN and other
Genentech products do not infringe the 522 patent or the
140 patent, and a declaratory judgment that those patents
are invalid. (Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC and Sanofi-Aventis
U.S., Inc. were later dismissed voluntarily.) On May 22,
2009, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
granted Genentechs and our petition for a writ of mandamus
transferring the Texas Action to the federal court in
California, and denied Sanofis petition for rehearing on
August 10, 2009. The Texas Action has been consolidated
with the California Action and we refer to the two actions
together as the Consolidated Actions. We have not formed an
opinion that an unfavorable outcome in the Consolidated Actions
is either probable or remote, and do not
express an opinion at this time as to the likely outcome of the
matters or as to the magnitude or range of any potential loss.
We believe that we have good and valid defenses and intend
vigorously to defend against the allegations against us.
On October 24, 2008, Hoechst GmbH filed with the ICC
International Court of Arbitration (Paris) a request for
arbitration against Genentech, relating to a terminated license
agreement between Hoechsts predecessor and Genentech that
pertained to the above-referenced patents and related patents
outside the
29
BIOGEN
IDEC INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited,
continued)
U.S. The license was entered as of January 1, 1991 and
was terminated by Genentech on October 27, 2008. We
understand that Hoechst seeks payment of royalties on sales of
Genentech products, including RITUXAN, damages for breach of
contract, and other relief. Although we are not a party to the
arbitration, any damages awarded to Hoescht based on sales of
RITUXAN may be a cost allocable to our collaboration with
Genentech. Under the collaboration agreement, we may be
responsible for a portion of any such damages. We have not
formed an opinion that an unfavorable outcome in the arbitration
is either probable or remote, and do not
express an opinion at this time as to the likely outcome of the
matter or as to the magnitude or range of any potential loss.
In addition, we are involved in product liability claims and
other legal proceedings generally incidental to our normal
business activities. While the outcome of any of these
proceedings cannot be accurately predicted, we do not believe
the ultimate resolution of any of these existing matters would
have a material adverse effect on our business or financial
conditions.
We operate in one business segment, which is the business of
development, manufacturing and commercialization of novel
therapeutics for human health care and therefore, our chief
operating decision-maker manages the operation of our Company as
a single operating segment.
|
|
18.
|
New
Accounting Pronouncements
|
From time to time, new accounting pronouncements are issued by
the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) or other
standard setting bodies that are adopted by the Company as of
the specified effective date. Unless otherwise discussed, we
believe that the impact of recently issued standards that are
not yet effective will not have a material impact on our
financial position or results of operations upon adoption.
Recently
Issued Accounting Standards
In October 2009, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update
(ASU)
No. 2009-13,
Multiple-Deliverable Revenue Arrangements (ASU
No. 2009-13).
ASU
No. 2009-13,
which amends existing revenue recognition accounting
pronouncements and provides accounting principles and
application guidance on whether multiple deliverables exist, how
the arrangement should be separated, and the consideration
allocated. This guidance eliminates the requirement to establish
the fair value of undelivered products and services and instead
provides for separate revenue recognition based upon
managements estimate of the selling price for an
undelivered item when there is no other means to determine the
fair value of that undelivered item. Previous accounting
principles required that the fair value of the undelivered item
be the price of the item either sold in a separate transaction
between unrelated third parties or the price charged for each
item when the item is sold separately by the vendor. This was
difficult to determine when the product was not individually
sold because of its unique features. If the fair value of all of
the elements in the arrangement was not determinable, then
revenue was deferred until all of the items were delivered or
fair value was determined. This new approach is effective
prospectively for revenue arrangements entered into or
materially modified in fiscal years beginning on or after
June 15, 2010, which for Biogen Idec means no later than
January 1, 2011. Early adoption is permitted; however,
adoption of this guidance as of a date other than
January 1, 2011, will require us to apply this guidance
retrospectively effective as of January 1, 2010 and will
require disclosure of the effect of this guidance as applied to
all previously reported interim periods in the fiscal year of
adoption. While we do not expect the adoption of this standard
to have a material impact on our financial position and results
of operations, this standard may impact us in the event we
complete future transactions or modify existing collaborative
relationships.
30
BIOGEN
IDEC INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited,
continued)
In June 2009, the FASB issued ASU
No. 2009-16,
Accounting for Transfers of Financial Assets (ASU
No. 2009-16).
ASU
No. 2009-16
prescribes the information that a reporting entity must provide
in its financial reports about a transfer of financial assets;
the effects of a transfer on its financial position, financial
performance, and cash flows; and a transferors continuing
involvement in transferred financial assets. Specifically, among
other aspects, this standard amends previously issued accounting
guidance, modifies the financial-components approach and removes
the concept of a qualifying special purpose entity when
accounting for transfers and servicing of financial assets and
extinguishments of liabilities, and removes the exception from
applying the general accounting principles for the consolidation
of variable interest entities that are qualifying
special-purpose entities. This new accounting standard is
effective for transfers of financial assets occurring on or
after January 1, 2010. The adoption of this standard did
not have an impact on our financial position or results of
operations.
31
|
|
Item 2.
|
Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations
|
The following discussion should be read in conjunction with our
consolidated financial statements and related notes beginning on
page 3 of this quarterly report on
Form 10-Q.
Executive
Summary
Introduction
Biogen Idec is a global biotechnology company that creates new
standards of care in therapeutic areas with high unmet medical
needs. Our business strategy is focused on discovering and
developing
first-in-class
or
best-in-class
products that we can deliver to specialty markets globally.
Patients around the world benefit from Biogen Idecs
significant products that address medical needs in the areas of
neurology, oncology and immunology.
In the near term, we are dependent upon continued sales of
AVONEX, RITUXAN and TYSABRI to drive our revenue growth. In the
longer term, our revenue growth will also be dependent upon the
successful clinical development, regulatory approval and launch
of new commercial products. As part of our ongoing research and
development efforts, we have also incurred significant
expenditures related to conducting clinical studies to develop
new pharmaceutical products and explore the utility of our
existing products in treating disorders beyond those currently
approved in their labels. We continue to focus our research and
development efforts within our core and emergent areas of
neurology, oncology, immunology, cardiopulmonary and hemophilia.
Financial
Highlights
The following table is a summary of results achieved:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months
|
|
|
Ended March 31,
|
(In millions, except per share amounts and percentages)
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
Change %
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
$
|
1,108.9
|
|
|
$
|
1,036.5
|
|
|
|
7.0
|
%
|
Income from operations
|
|
$
|
303.7
|
|
|
$
|
305.0
|
|
|
|
(0.4
|
)%
|
Net income attributable to Biogen Idec
|
|
$
|
217.4
|
|
|
$
|
244.0
|
|
|
|
(10.9
|
)%
|
Diluted earnings per share attributable to Biogen Idec
|
|
$
|
0.80
|
|
|
$
|
0.84
|
|
|
|
(4.8
|
)%
|
As described below under Results of Operations, our operating
results for the three months ended March 31, 2010 were
primarily driven by:
|
|
|
|
|
Increased AVONEX worldwide revenue. AVONEX revenues totaled
$592.5 million in the first quarter 2010, representing a
6.7% increase over the same period in 2009.
|
|
|
|
Continued TYSABRI growth. Global in-market net sales of TYSABRI
totaled $291.9 million in the first quarter of 2010. Our
share of TYSABRI revenues totaled $218.6 million for the
first quarter of 2010, representing an increase of 32.3% over
the same period in 2009.
|
|
|
|
U.S. in-market net sales of RITUXAN totaled
$686.7 million in the first quarter of 2010, representing
an increase of 7.0% over the same period in 2009. Our share of
RITUXAN revenues in the first quarter of 2010 totaled
$254.9 million, which includes of our share of co-promotion
profits in the U.S. totaling $200.3 million
representing an increase of 11.6% over the same period in 2009.
This increase was offset by a $45.9 million decrease in our
share of revenue on sales of RITUXAN in the rest of world.
Selling and development expenses incurred by us and reimbursed
by Genentech, which are also included within our share of
RITUXAN revenues, increased 8.0% to $16.2 million.
|
|
|
|
Total costs and expenses increased 10.1% in the first quarter of
2010 compared to the same period in 2009. This increase was
driven by a 48.6% increase in collaboration profit sharing
expense due to TYSABRI revenue growth, a 12.1% increase in
selling, general and administrative costs, a 9.9% increase in
research and development expense, and the $40.0 million
milestone payment made to the
|
32
|
|
|
|
|
former shareholders of Syntonix recorded as acquired in-process
research and development (IPR&D) expense during the first
quarter of 2010. These increases were primarily offset by a
decrease in amortization of acquired intangible assets of 45.2%.
|
For the three months ended March 31, 2010 we also generated
$336.9 million of net cash flows from operations which were
primarily driven by our earnings. In addition we also
repurchased approximately 10.5 million shares of our common
stock at a total cost of approximately $577.6 million
during the first quarter of 2010.
Cash and cash equivalents and marketable securities totaled
approximately $2,184.9 million as of March 31, 2010.
Business
Highlights
|
|
|
|
|
In April 2010, we announced that our Board of Directors
authorized the repurchase of up to $1.5 billion of our common
stock. This new repurchase authorization is intended to reduce
our shares outstanding with the objective of returning excess
cash to shareholders. We intend to retire these shares following
repurchase on the open market. This repurchase authorization
does not have an expiration date.
|
|
|
|
In March 2010, healthcare reform legislation was enacted in the
U.S. This legislation contains several provisions that
impact our business, which include expanding rebate coverage to
Managed Medicaid and an increase to the rate of rebates for all
our drugs dispensed to Medicaid beneficiaries, expanding the
340(B) drug pricing program requiring drug manufacturers to
provide discounted product to reduce the Medicare Part D
coverage gap, assessing a new fee on manufacturers and importers
of branded prescription drugs paid for pursuant to coverage
provided under specified government programs and the inclusion
of a biosimilars approval pathway granting biologics
manufacturers a 12 year period of exclusivity before generic
competition can be introduced. The impact of these changes is
further discussed below under the subsection titled
Healthcare Reform.
|
|
|
|
In March 2010, we entered into an agreement with certain funds
affiliated with Carl C. Icahn pursuant to which we appointed
Dr. Eric K. Rowinsky and Dr. Stephen A. Sherwin to our
Board of Directors.
|
|
|
|
In February 2010, we restructured our collaboration agreement
with Swedish Orphan Biovitrum (Biovitrum) and assumed full
development responsibilities and costs, as well as manufacturing
rights for the Factor VIII and Factor IX programs in exchange
for increased marketing rights for rest of world territories
which had been previously shared between the two companies.
These territories are in addition to our existing commercial
rights in North America. Biovitrum will retain commercial rights
in Europe, Russia, Turkey and the Middle East. As a result of
our assuming full development and manufacturing
responsibilities, we anticipate higher research and development
expense associated with these programs as compared to prior
periods during which we shared development costs equally with
Biovitrum.
|
|
|
|
In January 2010, we announced that James C. Mullen will retire
as our President and Chief Executive Officer on June 8,
2010, and will retire from our Board of Directors upon the
completion of his current term as a director upon certification
of the election results at our 2010 Annual Meeting of
Stockholders. We entered into a transition agreement with
Mr. Mullen on January 4, 2010. A search for
Mr. Mullens successor is underway.
|
Product
and Pipeline Highlights
|
|
|
|
|
In March 2010, Roche submitted a supplemental biologics license
application to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to
extend the RITUXAN label in NHL to include maintenance treatment
after achieving a response to RITUXAN in combination with
chemotherapy for previously untreated patients with advanced,
follicular lymphoma, which is a slow growing NHL. Roche
previously filed RITUXAN with the European Medicines Agency
(EMA) to extend the RITUXAN label in Europe to include
maintenance treatment for previously untreated patients with
advanced follicular lymphoma.
|
33
|
|
|
|
|
In March 2010, we and Elan initiated a Phase 3b
head-to-head
study, known as SURPASS, that will evaluate changing to TYSABRI
from COPAXONE or REBIF in patients with relapsing remitting
multiple sclerosis (RRMS). The study, which is expected to
enroll 1,800 patients in 27 countries, will also evaluate
the safety and tolerability of changing therapy to TYSABRI.
|
|
|
|
In March 2010, we and Roche announced our decision to suspend
ocrelizumab treatment of patients in the RA program following
the recommendation of the independent Ocrelizumab RA &
Lupus Data and Safety Monitoring Board based upon their
assessment of our four RA and two lupus studies. We plan to work
with regulators to determine the next steps for these studies.
Our current Phase 2 ocrelizumab study for the treatment of RRMS
remains on-going at this time.
|
|
|
|
In March 2010, we initiated two clinical studies in the U.S.,
known as STRATIFY-1 and STRATIFY-2, to evaluate the potential
clinical utility of a blood test that is designed to detect
antibodies to the JC virus. These studies are intended to define
the prevalence of serum JC virus antibody in patients with
relapsing MS receiving or considering treatment with TYSABRI and
to evaluate the potential to stratify patients into lower or
higher risk for developing progressive multifocal
leukoencephalopathy (PML) based on antibody status.
|
|
|
|
In March 2010, we and Genentech, a wholly owned member of the
Roche Group, were issued a patent by the U.S. Patent and
Trademark Office (PTO) related to a method of treating chronic
lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) using an anti-CD20 antibody. We
subsequently filed a lawsuit in federal court in the Southern
District of California alleging infringement of that patent
based upon GlaxoSmithKlines manufacture, marketing and
sale of ARZERRA. In February 2010, the FDA approved RITUXAN in
combination with fludarabine and cyclophosphamide for patients
with previously untreated, as well as previously treated,
CD20-positive CLL. These events expand the label for RITUXAN
beyond its current use in the treatment of RA and NHL.
|
|
|
|
In January 2010, the EMA recommended updating the TYSABRI label
in the E.U. to reflect, among other therapy, that the risk of
PML increases after two years of therapy, with limited
experience beyond three years. Additional information about the
EMAs recommendations is set forth below under the
subsection titled Product Revenues
TYSABRI. Preparations are currently underway to update the
TYSABRI label. In addition, a Direct Health Care Professional
Communication was sent out in February 2010 which provides
information consistent with the EMAs recommendations.
|
|
|
|
In January 2010, we initiated patient enrollment in a
registrational study for long-acting recombinant Factor IX in
hemophilia B, known as B-LONG. The initiation of this study
resulted in the achievement of a milestone, obligating us to pay
approximately $40.0 million to the former shareholders of
Syntonix.
|
Results
of Operations
Revenues
Revenues are summarized as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months
|
|
|
|
Ended March 31,
|
|
(In millions, except percentages)
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Product:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States
|
|
$
|
410.3
|
|
|
|
37.0
|
%
|
|
$
|
393.0
|
|
|
|
38.0
|
%
|
Rest of world
|
|
|
413.9
|
|
|
|
37.3
|
%
|
|
|
340.4
|
|
|
|
32.8
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total product revenues
|
|
$
|
824.2
|
|
|
|
74.3
|
%
|
|
$
|
733.4
|
|
|
|
70.8
|
%
|
Unconsolidated joint business
|
|
|
254.9
|
|
|
|
23.0
|
%
|
|
|
278.8
|
|
|
|
26.9
|
%
|
Other
|
|
|
29.7
|
|
|
|
2.7
|
%
|
|
|
24.3
|
|
|
|
2.3
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
$
|
1,108.9
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
$
|
1,036.5
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34
Product
Revenues
Product revenues are summarized as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months
|
|
|
|
Ended March 31,
|
|
(In millions, except percentages)
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
AVONEX
|
|
$
|
592.5
|
|
|
|
71.9
|
%
|
|
$
|
555.3
|
|
|
|
75.8
|
%
|
TYSABRI
|
|
|
218.6
|
|
|
|
26.5
|
%
|
|
|
165.2
|
|
|
|
22.5
|
%
|
Other
|
|
|
13.1
|
|
|
|
1.6
|
%
|
|
|
12.9
|
|
|
|
1.7
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total product revenues
|
|
$
|
824.2
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
$
|
733.4
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AVONEX
Revenues from AVONEX are summarized as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months
|
|
|
|
Ended March 31,
|
|
(In millions, except percentages)
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Change %
|
|
|
United States
|
|
$
|
349.9
|
|
|
$
|
340.0
|
|
|
|
2.9
|
%
|
Rest of world
|
|
|
242.6
|
|
|
|
215.3
|
|
|
|
12.7
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total AVONEX revenues
|
|
$
|
592.5
|
|
|
$
|
555.3
|
|
|
|
6.7
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the three months ended March 31, 2010 compared to the
same period in 2009, the increase in U.S. AVONEX revenue
was due to price increases offset by decreased commercial
demand. Decreased commercial demand resulted in a 9.4% decline
in U.S. AVONEX sales volume in the three months ended
March 31, 2010 over the prior year comparative period. In
addition, during the three months ended March 31, 2010, we
experienced higher participation in our Access Program, which
provides free product to eligible patients.
For the three months ended March 31, 2010 compared to the
same period in 2009, the increase in rest of world AVONEX
revenue was due to the positive impact of foreign currency
exchange rate changes and increased commercial demand. Increased
commercial demand resulted in a 3.7% increase in rest of world
AVONEX sales volume in the three months ended March 31,
2010 as compared to the prior year comparative period.
We expect AVONEX to face increasing competition in the MS
marketplace in both the U.S. and rest of world from
existing and new MS treatments, including oral and other
alternative formulations developed by our competitors, the
continued growth of TYSABRI and the commercialization of our
other pipeline product candidates, which may have a continued
negative impact on the unit sales of AVONEX as well as
increasing price pressure.
TYSABRI
We collaborate with Elan Pharma International, Ltd (Elan) an
affiliate of Elan Corporation, plc, on the development and
commercialization of TYSABRI. Please read Note 17,
Collaborations, to our Consolidated Financial Statements
included within our 2009
Form 10-K
for a description of this collaboration. Revenues from TYSABRI
are summarized as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months
|
|
|
|
Ended March 31,
|
|
(In millions, except percentages)
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Change %
|
|
|
United States
|
|
$
|
60.4
|
|
|
$
|
53.0
|
|
|
|
14.0
|
%
|
Rest of world
|
|
|
158.2
|
|
|
|
112.2
|
|
|
|
41.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total TYSABRI revenues
|
|
$
|
218.6
|
|
|
$
|
165.2
|
|
|
|
32.3
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35
For the three months ended March 31, 2010 compared to the
same period in 2009, the increase in U.S. TYSABRI revenue
was due to the continued increase in the number of patients
using TYSABRI in the U.S. Increased commercial demand
resulted in a 14.5% increase in U.S. TYSABRI sales volume
in the three months ended March 31, 2010 as compared to the
prior year comparative period. Net sales of TYSABRI from our
collaboration partner, Elan, to third-party customers in the
U.S. for each of the three months ended March 31, 2010
and 2009 totaled $135.2 million and $116.0 million,
respectively.
For the three months ended March 31, 2010 compared to the
same period in 2009, the increase in rest of world TYSABRI
revenue was due to the continued increase in the number of
patients using TYSABRI in our rest of world markets as well as
the positive impact of foreign currency exchange rate changes.
Increased commercial demand resulted in a 32.6% increase in rest
of world TYSABRI sales volume in the three months ended
March 31, 2010 as compared to the prior year comparative
period.
Since we reintroduced TYSABRI to the market in July 2006, some
patients taking TYSABRI have been diagnosed with PML, a rare but
serious brain infection described in the TYSABRI label. In
November 2009, the U.S. prescribing information for TYSABRI
was revised to reflect that the risk of PML increases with
longer treatment duration, and for patients treated for 24 to
36 months is generally similar to the rates seen in
clinical trials. The revised label also reflects that there is
limited experience beyond three years of treatment and that
immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome (IRIS) has been
reported in TYSABRI treated patients who developed PML and
subsequently discontinued TYSABRI. In January 2010, the EMA
recommended updating the TYSABRI label in the E.U. to reflect
that (1) the risk of PML increases after two years of
therapy; (2) the limited experience in patients taking
TYSABRI beyond three years means that the risk for PML in these
patients cannot currently be estimated; and (3) there is a
risk for the occurrence of IRIS in patients with TYSABRI induced
PML following discontinuation or removal of TYSABRI by plasma
exchange, a process that clears TYSABRI from a patients
blood allowing the immune system to fight the infection. The EMA
also recommended that patients have an MRI at baseline and
annual MRIs thereafter as well as be informed of the risk of PML
through the use of treatment forms at the start of treatment and
again after two years of therapy. Preparations are currently
underway to update the TYSABRI label. In addition, a Direct
Health Care Professional Communication was sent out in
February 2010 to all physicians prescribing TYSABRI in the
E.U. together with their professional associations, which
provides information consistent with the EMAs
recommendations.
We continue to monitor the growth of TYSABRI unit sales, which
may be further impacted by the updated prescribing information.
We continue to research and develop protocols that may reduce
risk and improve outcomes of PML in patients. We are working to
identify patient or viral characteristics which contribute to
the risk of developing PML, including the presence of
asymptomatic JC virus infection with an assay to detect an
immune response against the JC virus. Our efforts to improve
management of PML by physicians and to improve patient outcomes
have included researching plasma exchange to more rapidly remove
TYSABRI from a patient, and drug screening that identified
mefloquine as an anti-JC virus drug candidate. Specifically with
respect to the JC virus antibody assay, we have initiated two
clinical studies in the U.S., known as STRATIFY-1 and
STRATIFY-2. These studies are intended to define the prevalence
of serum JC virus antibody in patients with relapsing MS
receiving or considering treatment with TYSABRI and to evaluate
the potential to stratify patients into lower or higher risk for
developing PML based on antibody status. Our efforts at
stratifying patients into lower or higher risk for developing
PML, including evaluating the potential clinical utility of a JC
virus antibody assay, and other ongoing or future clinical
trials involving TYSABRI, may have a negative impact on
prescribing behavior which may result in decreased product
revenues from sales of TYSABRI.
Unconsolidated
Joint Business Revenue
We collaborate with Genentech on the development and
commercialization of RITUXAN. Please read Note 17,
Collaborations, to our Consolidated Financial Statements
included within our 2009
Form 10-K,
36
for a description of this collaboration. Revenues from
unconsolidated joint business are summarized as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months
|
|
|
|
Ended March 31
|
|
(In millions, except percentages)
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Change %
|
|
|
Biogen Idecs share of co-promotion profits in the
U.S.
|
|
$
|
200.3
|
|
|
$
|
179.5
|
|
|
|
11.6
|
%
|
Reimbursement of selling and development expense in the
U.S.
|
|
|
16.2
|
|
|
|
15.0
|
|
|
|
8.0
|
%
|
Revenue on sales of RITUXAN in the rest of world
|
|
|
38.4
|
|
|
|
84.3
|
|
|
|
(54.4
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total unconsolidated joint business revenues
|
|
$
|
254.9
|
|
|
$
|
278.8
|
|
|
|
(8.6
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table provides a summary of amounts comprising our
share of co-promotion profits in the U.S.:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months
|
|
|
|
Ended March 31
|
|
(In millions, except percentages)
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Change %
|
|
|
Product revenues, net
|
|
$
|
686.7
|
|
|
$
|
641.6
|
|
|
|
7.0
|
%
|
Costs and expenses
|
|
|
173.5
|
|
|
|
180.3
|
|
|
|
(3.8
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Co-promotion profits in the U.S.
|
|
$
|
513.2
|
|
|
$
|
461.3
|
|
|
|
11.3
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Biogen Idecs share of co-promotion profits in the
U.S.
|
|
$
|
200.3
|
|
|
$
|
179.5
|
|
|
|
11.6
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the three months ended March 31, 2010 compared to the
same period in 2009, the increase in U.S. RITUXAN product
revenues on sales recorded by Genentech resulted from continued
unit growth and price increases. Collaboration costs and
expenses for the three months ended March 31, 2010 compared
to the same period in 2009 decreased primarily due to higher
costs incurred in development of RITUXAN for use in other
indications during 2009.
Under our collaboration agreement, our current pretax
co-promotion profit-sharing formula, which resets annually,
provides for a 40% share of co-promotion profits if co-promotion
operating profits exceed $50.0 million. In 2010 and 2009,
the 40% threshold was met during the first quarter. Our
agreement with Genentech also provides that the successful
development and commercialization of the first New Anti-CD20
Product will decrease our percentage of co-promotion profits of
the collaboration. Please read Note 17,
Collaborations, to our Consolidated Financial Statements
included within our 2009
Form 10-K,
for additional information regarding the pretax co-promotion
profit sharing formula for RITUXAN and New Anti-CD20 Products
sold by us and Genentech following the approval date of the
first New Anti-CD20 Product.
For the three months ended March 31, 2010 compared to the
same period in 2009, the increase in selling and development
expenses incurred by us in the U.S. and reimbursed by
Genentech was primarily the result of our increased clinical
development and marketing expenses associated with the continued
development of RITUXAN. As discussed in Note 17,
Collaborations, to our Consolidated Financial Statements
included within our 2009
Form 10-K,
Genentech incurs the majority of continuing development costs
for RITUXAN. Expenses incurred by Genentech in the development
of RITUXAN are not recorded as research and development expense,
but rather reduce our share of co-promotion profits recorded as
a component of unconsolidated joint business revenue. Costs
associated with the development of other anti-CD20 products,
such as GA101, are recorded as research and development expense;
however, upon achievement of the successful commercialization of
these products, additional costs incurred in their continuing
development will no longer be recorded as research and
development expense but will instead reduce our share of
co-promotion profits recorded as a component of unconsolidated
joint business revenue.
For the three months ended March 31, 2010 compared to the
same period in 2009, revenues on sales of RITUXAN in the rest of
world continue to decline due to royalty expirations in certain
of our rest of world markets. The royalty period for sales in
the rest of world with respect to all products is 11 years
from the first commercial sale of such product on a
country-by-country
basis. Specifically, the royalty periods with respect to sales
in France, Spain, Germany and the United Kingdom expired in
2009. The royalty period with respect
37
to sales in Italy expired in this quarter. The royalty periods
for substantially all of the remaining royalty-bearing sales of
RITUXAN in the rest of the world will subsequently expire
through 2012. As a result of these expirations, we expect
royalty revenues derived from sales of RITUXAN in the rest of
world to continue to decline in future periods.
Other
Revenues
Other revenues are summarized as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months
|
|
|
|
Ended March 31,
|
|
(In millions, except percentages)
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Change %
|
|
|
Royalty revenues
|
|
$
|
26.0
|
|
|
$
|
24.1
|
|
|
|
7.9
|
%
|
Corporate partner revenues
|
|
|
3.7
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
1750.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other revenues
|
|
$
|
29.7
|
|
|
$
|
24.3
|
|
|
|
22.2
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We receive royalties on sales by our licensees of a number of
products covered under patents we own. For the three months
ended March 31, 2010 compared to the same period in 2009,
total royalty revenues were similar.
Our most significant source of royalty revenue is derived from
sales of ANGIOMAX by The Medicines Company (TMC). TMC sells
ANGIOMAX in the U.S., Europe, Canada, and Latin America. Royalty
revenues related to the sales of ANGIOMAX are recognized in an
amount equal to the level of net sales achieved during a
calendar year multiplied by the royalty rate in effect for that
tier under our agreement with TMC. The royalty rate increases
based upon which tier of total net sales are earned in any
calendar year. The increased royalty rate is applied
retroactively to the first dollar of net sales achieved during
the year. This formula has the effect of increasing the amount
of royalty revenue to be recognized in later quarters.
Accordingly, an adjustment is recorded in the period in which an
increase in royalty rate has been achieved.
Under the terms of our agreement, TMC is obligated to pay us
royalties earned, on a
country-by-country
basis, until the later of (1) twelve years from the date of
the first commercial sale of ANGIOMAX in such country and
(2) the date upon which the product is no longer covered by
a patent in such country. The annual royalty rate is reduced by
a specified percentage in any country where the product is no
longer covered by a patent and where sales have been reduced to
a certain volume-based market share. TMC began selling ANGIOMAX
in the U.S. in January 2001. The principal U.S. patent
that covers ANGIOMAX was due to expire in March 2010 and TMC
applied for an extension of the term of this patent. The PTO
rejected TMCs application because in its view the
application was not timely filed, but extended the patent term
until May 2010. TMC is in legal proceedings against the PTO
seeking to extend to December 2014 the term of the principal
U.S. patent. In the event that TMC is unsuccessful in
obtaining such a patent term extension and third parties sell
products comparable to ANGIOMAX after the period of marketing
exclusivity expires (the FDA granted TMC an additional six-month
period of marketing exclusivity for ANGIOMAX for having
investigated its use in pediatric patients), we would expect a
significant decrease in royalty revenues due to both lower
royalty rates and increased competition.
Provision
for Discounts and Allowances
Revenues from product sales are recorded net of applicable
allowances for trade term discounts, wholesaler incentives,
Medicaid rebates, Veterans Administration (VA) and Public Health
Service (PHS) discounts, managed care rebates, product returns,
and other applicable allowances. Reserves established for these
discounts and allowances are classified as reductions of
accounts receivable (if the amount is payable to
38
our customer) or a liability (if the amount is payable to a
party other than our customer). Reserves for discounts,
contractual adjustments and returns that reduced gross product
revenues are summarized as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months
|
|
|
|
Ended March 31,
|
|
(In millions, except percentages)
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Change %
|
|
|
Discounts
|
|
$
|
19.3
|
|
|
$
|
17.2
|
|
|
|
12.2
|
%
|
Contractual adjustments
|
|
|
55.9
|
|
|
|
41.8
|
|
|
|
33.7
|
%
|
Returns
|
|
|
4.6
|
|
|
|
5.9
|
|
|
|
(22.0
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total reserves
|
|
$
|
79.8
|
|
|
$
|
64.9
|
|
|
|
23.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross Product Revenues
|
|
$
|
904.0
|
|
|
$
|
798.3
|
|
|
|
13.2
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent of gross product revenues
|
|
|
8.8
|
%
|
|
|
8.1
|
%
|
|
|
8.6
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discount reserves include trade term discounts and wholesaler
incentives. For the three months ended March 31, 2010
compared to the same period in 2009, the increase in discounts
was primarily driven by increases in trade term discounts and
wholesaler incentives as a result of increased sales.
Contractual adjustment reserves relate to Medicaid and managed
care rebates, VA and PHS discounts and other applicable
allowances. For the three months ended March 31, 2010
compared to the same period in 2009, contractual adjustments
increased primarily due to the impact of higher reserves
resulting from U.S. healthcare reform legislation, increased
activity under managed care programs and increased rebates and
discounts resulting from U.S. price increases.
Product return reserves are established for returns made by
wholesalers. In accordance with contractual terms, wholesalers
are permitted to return product for reasons such as damaged or
expired product. We also accept returns from our patients for
various reasons. For the three months ended March 31, 2010
compared to the same period in 2009, return reserves remained
relatively unchanged.
Healthcare
Reform
In March 2010, healthcare reform legislation was enacted in the
U.S. This legislation contains several provisions that
impact our business.
Although many provisions of the new legislation do not take
effect immediately, several provisions became effective in the
first quarter of 2010. These include (1) an increase in the
minimum Medicaid rebate to states participating in the Medicaid
program from 15.1% to 23.1% on our branded prescription drugs;
(2) the extension of the Medicaid rebate to Managed Care
Organizations that dispense drugs to Medicaid beneficiaries; and
(3) the expansion of the 340(B) Public Health Services drug
pricing program, which provides outpatient drugs at reduced
rates, to include additional hospitals, clinics, and healthcare
centers.
Beginning in 2011, the new law requires drug manufacturers to
provide a 50% discount to Medicare beneficiaries whose
prescription drug costs cause them to be subject to the Medicare
Part D coverage gap (i.e. the donut hole).
Also, beginning in 2011, we will be assessed our share of a new
fee assessed on all branded prescription drug manufacturers and
importers. This fee will be calculated based upon each
organizations percentage share of total branded
prescription drug sales to U.S. government programs (such
as Medicare, Medicaid and VA and PHS discount programs) made
during the previous year. The aggregated industry wide fee is
expected to total $28 billion through 2019, ranging from
$2.5 billion to $4.1 billion annually.
Presently, uncertainty exists as many of the specific
determinations necessary to implement this new legislation have
yet to be decided and communicated to industry participants. For
example, we do not yet know when and how discounts will be
provided to the additional hospitals eligible to participate
under the 340(B) program. In addition, determinations as to how
the Medicare Part D coverage gap will operate and how the annual
fee on branded prescription drugs will be calculated and
allocated remain to be clarified, though, as noted above, these
programs will not be effective until 2011. We have made several
estimates with regard to important assumptions relevant to
determining the financial impact of this legislation on our
business
39
due to the lack of availability of both certain information and
complete understanding of how the process of applying the
legislation will be implemented.
In 2010, we expect that the new legislation will reduce our
revenues by approximately $70 to $90 million as a result of
the higher rebates and discounts on our products. We are still
assessing the full extent of this legislations longer term
impact on our business. While certain aspects of the new
legislation implemented in 2010 are expected to reduce our
revenues in 2010 and in future years, other provisions of this
legislation may offset, at some level, any reduction in revenues
when these provisions become effective. In future years, based
on our understanding, these other provisions are expected to
result in higher revenues due to an increase in the total number
of patients covered by health insurance and an expectation that
existing insurance coverage will provide more comprehensive
consumer protections. This would include a federal subsidy for a
portion of a beneficiarys
out-of-pocket
cost under Medicare Part D. However, these higher revenues
will be negatively impacted by the branded prescription drug
manufacturers fee.
In addition, we anticipate seeing continued efforts to reduce
healthcare costs in many other countries outside the
U.S. For example, the German government is expected to
implement measures during the second half of 2010 that, among
other things, increase mandatory discounts and impose a three
year price freeze on pharmaceuticals, based on 2009 pricing. We
expect that our revenues would be negatively impacted if these
or similar measures are implemented.
Costs and
Expenses
Total costs and expenses are summarized as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months
|
|
|
|
Ended March 31,
|
|
(In millions, except percentages)
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
% Change
|
|
|
Cost of sales, excluding amortization of acquired intangible
assets
|
|
$
|
97.1
|
|
|
$
|
98.2
|
|
|
|
(1.2
|
)%
|
Research and development
|
|
|
307.0
|
|
|
|
279.5
|
|
|
|
9.9
|
%
|
Selling, general and administrative
|
|
|
248.7
|
|
|
|
221.8
|
|
|
|
12.1
|
%
|
Collaboration profit sharing
|
|
|
63.6
|
|
|
|
42.8
|
|
|
|
48.6
|
%
|
Amortization of acquired intangible assets
|
|
|
48.9
|
|
|
|
89.2
|
|
|
|
(45.2
|
)%
|
Acquired in-process research and development
|
|
|
40.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total costs and expenses
|
|
$
|
805.2
|
|
|
$
|
731.5
|
|
|
|
10.1
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of
Sales, Excluding Amortization of Acquired Intangible Assets
(Cost of Sales)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months
|
|
|
|
Ended March 31,
|
|
(In millions, except percentages)
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Change %
|
|
|
Cost of sales
|
|
$
|
97.1
|
|
|
$
|
98.2
|
|
|
|
(1.2
|
)%
|
For the three months ended March 31, 2010 compared to the
same period in 2009, the decrease in cost of sales was
essentially unchanged.
Research
and Development
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months
|
|
|
|
Ended March 31,
|
|
(In millions, except percentages)
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Change %
|
|
|
Research and development
|
|
$
|
307.0
|
|
|
$
|
279.5
|
|
|
|
9.9
|
%
|
For the three months ended March 31, 2010 compared to the
same period in 2009, the increase in research and development
expense was primarily due to increased clinical activity related
to our Factor IX and Factor VIII programs and the related
restructuring of the collaboration agreement with Biovitrum,
whereby we assumed full development and manufacturing
responsibilities for these programs and as a result incurred
increased costs.
40
In addition, our R&D spend also increased as a result of
increasing clinical trial activity for certain product
candidates in or near registrational stage development,
including among others, PEGylated interferon beta-1a and
Daclizumab. These increases were offset by a reduction in
spending in certain programs, including Adentri, Lumiliximab and
CDP323, which were deprioritized in 2009. For the three months
ended March 31, 2010 compared to the same period in 2009,
milestone payments included within research and development
expense totaled $6.0 million and $10.0 million,
respectively.
The timing of upfront fees and milestone payments in the future
may cause variability in future research and development
expense. As of March 31, 2010, we anticipate that we may
pay approximately $33.0 million of additional milestone
payments during the remainder of 2010, provided various
developmental milestones are achieved. Included within this
amount is a $30.0 million milestone payable to Facet
Biotech Corporation, our collaborative partner for the
development and commercialization of Daclizumab, due upon
enrollment of the first patient in a Phase 3 trial in relapsing
MS, known as DECIDE. This milestone is expected to be achieved
in the second quarter of 2010.
Selling,
General and Administrative
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months
|
|
|
|
Ended March 31,
|
|
(In millions, except percentages)
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Change %
|
|
|
Selling, general and administrative
|
|
$
|
248.7
|
|
|
$
|
221.8
|
|
|
|
12.1
|
%
|
For the three months ended March 31, 2010 compared to the
same period in 2009, selling, general and administrative
expenses increased primarily due to increased sales and
marketing activities in support of AVONEX and TYSABRI, the
negative impact of foreign currency exchange rates and
$10.6 million of additional expense recognized related to
the modification of equity based compensation in accordance with
the transition agreement entered into with James C. Mullen, who
will retire as our President and Chief Executive Officer on
June 8, 2010.
Collaboration
Profit Sharing
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months
|
|
|
|
Ended March 31,
|
|
(In millions, except percentages)
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Change %
|
|
|
Collaboration profit sharing
|
|
$
|
63.6
|
|
|
$
|
42.8
|
|
|
|
48.6
|
%
|
For the three months ended March 31, 2010 compared to the
same period in 2009, the increase in collaboration profit
sharing expense was due to the continued increase in TYSABRI
rest of world sales resulting in higher rest of world net
operating profits to be shared with Elan and resulting in growth
in the third-party royalties Elan paid on behalf of the
collaboration. For the three months ended March 31, 2010
compared to the same period in 2009, our collaboration profit
sharing expense included $11.4 million and
$8.1 million, respectively, related to the reimbursement of
third-party royalty payments made by Elan. Please read
Note 17, Collaborations, to our Consolidated
Financial Statements included within our 2009
Form 10-K
for a description of this collaboration.
Amortization
of Acquired Intangible Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months
|
|
|
|
Ended March 31,
|
|
(In millions, except percentages)
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Change %
|
|
|
Amortization of acquired intangible assets
|
|
$
|
48.9
|
|
|
$
|
89.2
|
|
|
|
(45.2
|
)%
|
For the three months ended March 31, 2010 compared to the
same period in 2009, amortization of acquired intangible assets
decreased significantly primarily as a result of a change in the
amortization for the core technology related to our AVONEX
product which is our most significant intangible asset. Our
amortization policy reflects our belief that the economic
benefit of our core technology is consumed as revenue is
generated from our AVONEX product. We refer to this amortization
methodology as the economic
41
consumption model. An analysis of the anticipated lifetime
revenue of AVONEX is performed at least annually during our long
range planning cycle each year. This analysis serves as the
basis for the calculation of economic consumption amortization
model.
We completed our most recent long range planning cycle in the
third quarter of 2009. This analysis is based upon certain
assumptions that we evaluate on a periodic basis, such as the
anticipated product sales of AVONEX and expected impact of
competitive products and our own pipeline product candidates, as
well as the issuance of new patents or the extension of existing
patents. The results of our most recent analysis were most
significantly impacted by the issuance in September 2009 of a
U.S. patent covering the treatment of MS with AVONEX, which
resulted in an increase in the total expected lifetime revenue
of AVONEX and an extension of the assumed remaining life of our
core intangible asset. Based upon this most recent analysis,
amortization of intangible assets, included within our
consolidated balance sheet as of March 31, 2010, is
expected to be in the range of approximately $160.0 million
to $220.0 million for each of the next five years.
Acquired
In-Process Research and Development (IPR&D)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months
|
|
|
|
Ended March 31,
|
|
(In millions, except percentages)
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Change %
|
|
|
Acquired in-process research and development
|
|
$
|
40.0
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In connection with our acquisition of Syntonix, we agreed to
make additional future consideration payments contingent upon
the achievement of certain milestone events. In January 2010, we
initiated patient enrollment in a registrational study for
long-acting recombinant Factor IX in hemophilia B, known as
B-LONG. The
initiation of this study resulted in the achievement of a
milestone under the acquisition agreement, obligating us to pay
approximately $40.0 million to the former shareholders of
Syntonix. This amount is reflected as IPR&D expense within
our consolidated statement of income for the three months ended
March 31, 2010.
Other
Income (Expense), Net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months
|
|
|
|
Ended March 31,
|
|
(In millions, except percentages)
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Change %
|
|
|
Interest income
|
|
$
|
8.9
|
|
|
$
|
14.8
|
|
|
|
(39.9
|
)%
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(8.3
|
)
|
|
|
(9.9
|
)
|
|
|
16.2
|
%
|
Impairments of investments
|
|
|
(15.8
|
)
|
|
|
(6.1
|
)
|
|
|
(159.0
|
)%
|
Net realized gains on foreign currency transactions
|
|
|
1.0
|
|
|
|
3.0
|
|
|
|
(66.7
|
)%
|
Net realized gains on marketable securities
|
|
|
5.0
|
|
|
|
4.3
|
|
|
|
16.3
|
%
|
Other, net
|
|
|
0.8
|
|
|
|
0.7
|
|
|
|
14.3
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other income (expense), net
|
|
$
|
(8.4
|
)
|
|
$
|
6.8
|
|
|
|
(223.5
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
Income
For the three months ended March 31, 2010 compared to the
same period in 2009, interest income decreased primarily due to
lower yields on cash, cash equivalents, and marketable
securities and lower average cash balances.
Impairment
on Investments
For the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, we
recognized $15.8 million and $2.5 million,
respectively, in charges for the
other-than-temporary
impairment of our publicly held strategic investments and
investments in privately-held companies. The increase in the
three months ended March 31, 2010 compared to
42
the same period in 2009 was primarily the result of AVEO
Pharmaceuticals, Inc., one of our strategic investments,
executing an equity offering at an amount below our cost basis.
For the three months ended March 31, 2009, we recognized
other-than-temporary
impairment charges of $3.6 million on our marketable debt
securities. No impairments were recognized related to our
marketable debt securities for the three months ended
March 31, 2010.
Impairment
on Property
We own or lease real estate primarily consisting of buildings
that contain research laboratories, office space, and biologic
manufacturing operations, some of which are located in markets
that are experiencing high vacancy rates and decreasing property
values. If we decide to consolidate, co-locate or dispose of
certain aspects of our business operations, for strategic or
other operational reasons, we may dispose of one or more of our
properties. Due to reduced expectations of product demand,
improved yields on production and other factors, we may not
fully utilize our manufacturing facilities at normal levels
resulting in idle time at facilities or substantial excess
manufacturing capacity. We are always evaluating our current
strategy, as well as other alternatives, including whether to
delay completion of a manufacturing facility in Denmark. If any
of our owned properties are held for sale and we determine that
the fair value of the properties is lower than their book value,
we may not realize the full investment in these properties and
incur significant impairment charges. In addition, if we decide
to fully or partially vacate a leased property, we may incur
significant cost, including lease termination fees, rent expense
in excess of sublease income and impairment of leasehold
improvements.
Income
Tax Provision
Tax
Rate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months
|
|
|
|
Ended March 31,
|
|
(In millions, except percentages)
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Change %
|
|
|
Effective tax rate
|
|
|
25.5
|
%
|
|
|
21.0
|
%
|
|
|
21.4
|
%
|
Income tax expense
|
|
$
|
75.3
|
|
|
$
|
65.2
|
|
|
|
15.5
|
%
|
Our effective tax rate will fluctuate from period to period due
to several factors including the nature of our global
operations. The factors that most significantly impact our
effective tax rate include the variability in the allocation of
our taxable earnings in multiple jurisdictions, changes in tax
laws, acquisitions and licensing transactions.
For the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, our
effective tax rates were 25.5% and 21.0%, respectively. The
increase in our tax rate for the three months ended
March 31, 2010 compared to the same period in 2009 was
primarily a result of the expiration of the federal research and
development tax credit at the end of 2009 and, in the first
quarter of 2009, a favorable change in certain state tax laws.
As a result of the 2009 changes in tax law we reduced our first
quarter 2009 tax expense by $30.2 million. The federal
research and development tax credit had a 1.6% favorable impact
on our effective tax rate for first quarter of 2009. The
unfavorable impact of not having these benefits recur in 2010
was partially offset by a higher percentage of our profits being
earned in lower rate international jurisdictions. This change is
caused by lower 2010 domestic earnings, as a proportion of total
consolidated earnings due to the recently enacted U.S.
healthcare reform legislation, the growth in our international
operations and a reorganization of our international operations.
During 2010, we also had a favorable impact from a statutory
increase in the U.S. manufacturers tax deduction.
We expect our full-year 2010 effective tax rate to be between
28% and 30%. This rate does not consider the impact of a
potential renewal of the U.S. federal research and
development tax credit. Please read Note 13, Income Taxes
to our Consolidated Financial Statements included in this
report for a detailed income tax rate reconciliation for the
three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009.
43
Financial
Condition and Liquidity
Our financial condition is summarized as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of
|
|
|
As of
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions, except percentages)
|
|
March 31, 2010
|
|
|
December 31, 2009
|
|
|
Change%
|
|
|
Financial assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
639.6
|
|
|
$
|
581.9
|
|
|
|
9.9
|
%
|
Marketable securities current
|
|
|
513.1
|
|
|
|
681.8
|
|
|
|
(24.7
|
)%
|
Marketable securities non-current
|
|
|
1,032.2
|
|
|
|
1,194.1
|
|
|
|
(13.6
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total financial assets
|
|
$
|
2,184.9
|
|
|
$
|
2,457.8
|
|
|
|
(11.1
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Borrowings:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current portion of notes payable and line of credit
|
|
$
|
19.1
|
|
|
$
|
19.8
|
|
|
|
(3.3
|
)%
|
Notes payable and line of credit
|
|
|
1,076.2
|
|
|
|
1,080.2
|
|
|
|
(0.4
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total borrowings
|
|
$
|
1,095.3
|
|
|
$
|
1,100.0
|
|
|
|
(0.4
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Working Capital:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets
|
|
$
|
2,409.0
|
|
|
$
|
2,480.6
|
|
|
|
(2.9
|
)%
|
Current liabilities
|
|
|
(682.3
|
)
|
|
|
(714.9
|
)
|
|
|
4.6
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total working capital
|
|
$
|
1,726.7
|
|
|
$
|
1,765.7
|
|
|
|
(2.2
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the three months ended March 31, 2010, certain
significant cash flows were as follows:
$577.6 million used for share repurchases;
$329.6 million in net proceeds received on sales of
marketable securities;
|
|
|
|
|
$52.8 million in proceeds from the issuance of stock for
share-based compensation arrangements;
|
|
|
|
$40.0 million payment made to the former shareholders of
Syntonix recognized as IPR&D expense; and
|
$38.2 million used for purchases of property, plant
and equipment.
For the three months ended March 31, 2009, certain
significant cash flows were as follows:
$57.6 million used for share repurchases;
$62.9 million in total payments for income taxes;
$52.7 million used for net purchases of marketable
securities; and
$37.0 million used for purchases of property, plant
and equipment.
We have financed our operating and capital expenditures
principally through cash flows from our operations. We expect to
continue financing our current and planned operating
requirements principally through cash from operations, as well
as existing cash resources. We believe that existing funds, cash
generated from operations and existing sources of, and access
to, financing are adequate to satisfy our operating, working
capital, strategic alliance and acquisition, milestone payment,
capital expenditure and debt service requirements for the
foreseeable future. In addition, we plan to opportunistically
return cash to shareholders and pursue other business
initiatives, including acquisition and licensing activities. We
may, from time to time, seek additional funding through a
combination of new collaborative agreements, strategic alliances
and additional equity and debt financings or from other sources.
Please read the Risk Factors and Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk sections of
this report for items that could negatively impact our cash
position and ability to fund future operations.
44
Share
Repurchase Programs
In October 2009, our Board of Directors authorized the
repurchase of up to $1.0 billion of our common stock with
the objective of reducing shares outstanding and returning
excess cash to shareholders. This repurchase program was
completed during the first quarter of 2010. During the three
months ended March 31, 2010, approximately
10.5 million shares of our common stock were repurchased
for approximately $577.6 million under this program. During
2009, we repurchased approximately 8.8 million shares under
this program at a cost of approximately $422.4 million. All
shares repurchased under this program were retired.
In April 2010, we announced that our Board of Directors
authorized the repurchase of up to $1.5 billion of our common
stock. This new repurchase authorization is intended to reduce
our shares outstanding with the objective of returning excess
cash to shareholders. We intend to retire these shares following
repurchase on the open market. This repurchase authorization
does not have an expiration date.
Cash,
Cash Equivalents and Marketable Securities
Until required for use in the business, we invest our cash
reserves in bank deposits, certificates of deposit, commercial
paper, corporate notes, U.S. and foreign government
instruments and other interest bearing marketable debt
instruments in accordance with our investment policy. We attempt
to mitigate credit risk in our cash reserves and marketable
securities by maintaining a well diversified portfolio that
limits the amount of investment exposure as to institution,
maturity, and investment type. In particular, the value of our
investments may be adversely affected by increases in interest
rates, downgrades in the corporate bonds included in our
portfolio, instability in the global financial markets that
reduces the liquidity of securities included in our portfolio,
and by other factors which may result in
other-than-temporary
declines in the value of the investments. Each of these events
may cause us to record charges to reduce the carrying value of
our investment portfolio or sell investments for less than our
acquisition cost which could adversely impact our financial
position and our overall liquidity. Please read Note 6,
Fair Value Measurements to our Consolidated Financial
Statements included in this report for a summary of the fair
value and valuation methods of our marketable securities as of
March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009.
The decrease in cash and marketable securities from
December 31, 2009 is primarily due to share repurchases,
purchases of property, plant and equipment, tax payments and the
$40.0 milestone payment paid to the former shareholders of
Syntonix offset by an increase in cash from operations and
proceeds from the issuance of stock under our share-based
compensation arrangements.
Borrowings
There have been no significant changes in our borrowings since
December 31, 2009.
We have a $360.0 million senior unsecured revolving credit
facility, which we may use for future working capital and
general corporate purposes. This facility terminates in June
2012. As of March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009,
there were no borrowings under this credit facility and we were
in compliance with applicable covenants. The credit rating on
our Senior Notes at March 31, 2010, was Baa3 with a stable
outlook by Moodys Investors Service and BBB+ with a stable
outlook by Standard & Poors. Please read
Note 6, Fair Value Measurements to our Consolidated
Financial Statements included in this report for a summary of
the fair and carrying value of outstanding borrowings as of
March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009.
Working
Capital
We define working capital as current assets less current
liabilities. The decrease in working capital from
December 31, 2009 primarily reflects the overall decrease
in current assets of $71.6 million and was primarily due to
the net decrease in cash, cash equivalents and marketable
securities resulting from our return of excess cash to
shareholders via completion of our 2009 share repurchase
program, offset by the overall reduction of current liabilities
of $32.6 million. The reduction in current liabilities was
driven by a $67.9 million reduction in accrued expenses and
other, primarily related to the payment of 2009 annual bonus
amounts due to
45
employees and the payment of interest on our Senior Notes, which
is payable March 1 and September 1 of each year,
offset by an increase in balances attributable to taxes payable.
Cash
Flows
The following table summarizes our cash flow activity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months
|
|
|
|
Ended March 31,
|
|
(In millions, except percentages)
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Change %
|
|
|
Net cash flows provided by operating activities
|
|
$
|
336.9
|
|
|
$
|
300.8
|
|
|
|
12.0
|
%
|
Net cash flows provided by (used in) investing activities
|
|
$
|
249.7
|
|
|
$
|
(91.7
|
)
|
|
|
372.3
|
%
|
Net cash flows used in financing activities
|
|
$
|
(523.5
|
)
|
|
$
|
(66.9
|
)
|
|
|
(682.1
|
)%
|
Operating
Activities
Cash flows from operating activities represent the cash receipts
and disbursements related to all of our activities other than
investing and financing activities. Cash provided by operating
activities is primarily driven by our earnings and changes in
working capital. We expect cash provided from operating
activities will continue to be our primary source of funds to
finance operating needs and capital expenditures for the
foreseeable future.
Operating cash flow is derived by adjusting net income for:
|
|
|
|
|
Non-cash operating items such as depreciation and amortization,
impairment charges and share-based compensation charges;
|
|
|
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities which reflect timing
differences between the receipt and payment of cash associated
with transactions and when they are recognized in results of
operations; and
|
|
|
|
The payment of contingent milestones associated with our prior
acquisitions of businesses.
|
The increase in cash provided by operating activities for the
three months ended March 31, 2010 compared to the same
period in 2009, was primarily driven by a decrease in payments
related to accrued expenses and income tax liabilities offset by
an increase in receivables due from unconsolidated joint
business.
Investing
Activities
The increase in cash provided by investing activities is
primarily due to net sales of marketable securities during the
three months ended March 31, 2010 compared to the same
period in 2009, offset by our milestone payment made to the
former shareholders of Syntonix.
Net proceeds received on net sales of marketable securities
totaled $329.6 million for the three months ended
March 31, 2010 as compared to net purchases of
$52.7 million made during the same period in 2009.
Financing
Activities
The increase in cash used in financing activities is due
principally to increases in the amounts of our common stock
repurchased compared to the same period in 2009. In the three
months ended March 31, 2010, we repurchased approximately
10.5 million shares of our common stock for approximately
$577.6 million as compared to 1.2 million shares for
approximately $57.6 million in the three months ended
March 31, 2009.
46
Contractual
Obligations and Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
Contractual
Obligations
Our contractual obligations primarily consists of our
obligations under non-cancellable operating leases, our notes
payable and line of credit and other purchase obligations,
excluding amounts related to uncertain tax positions, amounts
payable to tax authorities, funding commitments, contingent
milestone payments, and other off-balance sheet arrangements as
described below. There have been no significant changes in our
contractual obligations since December 31, 2009.
Tax
Related Obligations
We exclude liabilities pertaining to uncertain tax positions
from our summary of contractual obligations as we cannot make a
reliable estimate of the period of cash settlement with the
respective taxing authorities. As of March 31, 2010, we
have approximately $57.6 million of long-term liabilities
associated with uncertain tax positions.
In addition, our summary of contractual obligations excludes
amounts related to the settlement of certain federal and state
tax audits in the fourth quarter of 2009. As of March 31,
2010, we expect to pay approximately $88.5 million within
the next six months in connection with such settlements.
Funding
Commitments
As of March 31, 2010, we have funding commitments of up to
approximately $23.1 million as part of our investment in
biotechnology oriented venture capital investments.
As of March 31, 2010, we have several ongoing clinical
studies in various clinical trial stages. Our most significant
clinical trial expenditures are to clinical research
organizations (CROs). The contracts with CROs are generally
cancellable, with notice, at our option. We have recorded
$30.3 million of accrued expenses on our consolidated
balance sheet for work done by CROs as of March 31, 2010.
We have approximately $400.0 million in cancellable future
commitments based on existing CRO contracts as of March 31,
2010, which are not included within contractual obligations as
they are cancellable.
Contingent
Milestone Payments
Based on our development plans as of March 31, 2010, we
have committed to make potential future milestone payments to
third parties of up to $1,400.0 million as part of our
various collaborations including licensing and development
programs. Payments under these agreements generally become due
and payable only upon achievement of certain developmental,
regulatory or commercial milestones. Because the achievement of
these milestones had not occurred as of March 31, 2010,
such contingencies have not been recorded in our financial
statements. As of March 31, 2010, we anticipate that we may
make approximately $33.0 million of additional milestone
payments during the remainder of 2010, provided various
developmental milestones are achieved.
Amounts related to contingent milestone payments are not
considered contractual obligations as they are contingent on the
successful achievement of certain development, regulatory
approval and commercial milestones. These milestones may not be
achieved.
Other
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We do not have any significant relationships with entities often
referred to as structured finance or special purpose entities,
which would have been established for the purpose of
facilitating off-balance sheet arrangements. As such, we are not
exposed to any financing, liquidity, market or credit risk that
could arise if we had engaged in such relationships. We
consolidate entities if we are the primary beneficiary.
47
Legal
Matters
Please read Note 16, Litigation to our Consolidated
Financial Statements included in this report for a discussion of
legal matters as of March 31, 2010.
New
Accounting Standards
Refer read Note 18, New Accounting Pronouncements to
our Consolidated Financial Statements included in this report
for a discussion of new accounting standards.
Critical
Accounting Estimates
The discussion and analysis of our financial position and
results of operations is based on our consolidated financial
statements, which have been prepared in accordance with
U.S. GAAP. The preparation of these consolidated financial
statements in accordance with U.S. GAAP requires us to make
estimates and judgments that may affect the reported amounts of
assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, and related
disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. On an ongoing
basis, we evaluate our estimates and judgments, including those
related to revenue recognition and related allowances,
marketable securities, derivatives and hedging activities,
inventory, impairments of long-lived assets including intangible
assets, impairments of goodwill, the consolidation of variable
interest entities, income taxes including the valuation
allowance for deferred tax assets, valuation of investments,
research and development expenses, contingencies and litigation,
and share-based payments. We base our estimates on historical
experience and on various other assumptions that we believe are
reasonable, the results of which form the basis for making
judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities.
Actual results may differ from these estimates under different
assumptions or conditions.
Please read Part II, Item 7 Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations of our 2009
Form 10-K
for a discussion of our critical accounting estimates.
|
|
Item 3.
|
Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
|
Our market risks, and the ways we manage them, are summarized in
Part II, Item 7A, Quantitative and Qualitative
Disclosures About Market Risk of our 2009
Form 10-K.
There have been no material changes in the first three months of
2010 to our market risks or to our management of such risks.
|
|
Item 4.
|
Controls
and Procedures
|
Disclosure
Controls and Procedures and Internal Control over Financial
Reporting
Disclosure
Controls and Procedures
We have carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and
with the participation of our management, including our
principal executive officer and principal financial officer, of
the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure
controls and procedures (as defined in
Rules 13a-15(e)
and
15d-15(e)
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended
(Securities Exchange Act), as of March 31, 2010. Based upon
that evaluation, our principal executive officer and principal
financial officer concluded that, as of the end of the period
covered by this report, our disclosure controls and procedures
are effective in ensuring that (a) the information required
to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit
under the Securities Exchange Act is recorded, processed,
summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the
Securities and Exchange Commissions rules and forms, and
(b) such information is accumulated and communicated to our
management, including our principal executive officer and
principal financial officer, as appropriate to allow timely
decisions regarding required disclosure. In designing and
evaluating our disclosure controls and procedures, our
management recognized that any controls and procedures, no
matter how well designed and operated, can provide only
reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control
objectives, and our management necessarily was required to apply
its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of
possible controls and procedures.
48
Changes
in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
There were no changes in our internal control over financial
reporting during the quarter ended March 31, 2010 that have
materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially
affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
Part II
OTHER INFORMATION
|
|
Item 1.
|
Legal
Proceedings
|
Please read Note 16, Litigation, to our Consolidated
Financial Statements included in this report, which is
incorporated into this item by reference.
We are
substantially dependent on revenues from our three principal
products.
Our current and future revenues depend upon continued sales of
our three principal products, AVONEX, RITUXAN and TYSABRI, which
represented substantially all of our total revenues during 2009
and the first quarter of 2010. Although we have developed and
continue to develop additional products for commercial
introduction, we expect to be substantially dependent on sales
from these three products for many years. Any negative
developments relating to any of these products, such as safety
or efficacy issues, the introduction or greater acceptance of
competing products, including biosimilars, or adverse regulatory
or legislative developments may reduce our revenues and
adversely affect our results of operations.
TYSABRIs
sales growth is important to our success.
We expect that our revenue growth over the next several years
will be dependent upon sales of TYSABRI. If we are not
successful in growing sales of TYSABRI, our future business
plans, revenue growth and results of operations may be adversely
affected.
TYSABRIs sales growth cannot be certain given the
significant restrictions on use and the significant safety
warnings in the label, including the risk of developing
progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML), a rare but
serious brain infection. The risk of developing PML increases
with longer treatment duration, with limited experience beyond
three years of treatment. This may cause prescribing physicians
or patients to suspend treatment with TYSABRI. If the incidence
of PML at various durations of exposure were to exceed the rate
implied in the TYSABRI label, it could limit sales growth,
prompt regulatory review, require significant changes to the
label or result in market withdrawal. Additional regulatory
restrictions on the use of TYSABRI or safety-related label
changes, including enhanced risk management programs, whether as
a result of additional cases of PML or otherwise, may
significantly reduce expected revenues and require significant
expense and management time to address the associated legal and
regulatory issues. In addition, ongoing or future clinical
trials involving TYSABRI and efforts at stratifying patients
into lower or higher risk for developing PML, including
evaluating the potential clinical utility of a JC virus antibody
assay, may have an adverse impact on prescribing behavior and
reduce sales of TYSABRI.
Because of the significant restrictions on use, TYSABRI sales
may be especially sensitive to new competing products. A number
of such products are expected to be approved for use in multiple
sclerosis beginning in 2010. If these products have a similar or
more attractive profile in terms of efficacy, convenience or
safety, future sales of TYSABRI could be limited, which would
reduce our revenues.
If we
fail to compete effectively, our business and market position
would suffer.
The biotechnology and pharmaceutical industry is intensely
competitive. We compete in the marketing and sale of our
products, the development of new products and processes, the
acquisition of rights to new products with commercial potential
and the hiring and retention of personnel. We compete with
biotechnology and pharmaceutical companies that have a greater
number of products on the market and in the product
49
pipeline, greater financial and other resources and other
technological or competitive advantages. One or more of our
competitors may receive patent protection that dominates, blocks
or adversely affects our product development or business, may
benefit from significantly greater sales and marketing
capabilities, and may develop products that are accepted more
widely than ours. The introduction of more efficacious, safer,
cheaper, or more convenient alternatives to our products could
reduce our revenues and the value of our product development
efforts. In addition, recently enacted healthcare reform
legislation in the U.S. has created a pathway for the FDA
to approve biosimilars, which could compete on price and
differentiation with products that we now or could in the future
market.
In addition to competing directly with products that are
marketed by substantial pharmaceutical competitors, AVONEX,
RITUXAN and TYSABRI also face competition from off-label uses of
drugs approved for other indications. Some of our current
competitors are also working to develop alternative formulations
for delivery of their products, which may in the future compete
with ours.
Our
long-term success depends upon the successful development and
commercialization of other product candidates.
Our long-term viability and growth will depend upon the
successful development and commercialization of other products
from our research and development activities. Product
development and commercialization are very expensive and involve
a high degree of risk. Only a small number of research and
development programs result in the commercialization of a
product. Success in preclinical work or early stage clinical
trials does not ensure that later stage or larger scale clinical
trials will be successful. Even if later stage clinical trials
are successful, regulatory authorities may disagree with our
view of the data or require additional studies.
Conducting clinical trials is a complex, time-consuming and
expensive process. Our ability to complete our clinical trials
in a timely fashion depends in large part on a number of key
factors including protocol design, regulatory and institutional
review board approval, the rate of patient enrollment in
clinical trials, and compliance with extensive current good
clinical practice requirements. We have opened clinical sites
and are enrolling patients in a number of new countries where
our experience is more limited, and we are in many cases using
the services of third-party clinical trial providers. If we fail
to adequately manage the design, execution and regulatory
aspects of our large, complex and diverse clinical trials, our
studies and ultimately our regulatory approvals may be delayed
or we may fail to gain approval for our product candidates
altogether.
Our product pipeline includes several small molecule drug
candidates. Our small molecule drug discovery platform is not as
well developed as our biologics platform, and we will have to
make a significant investment of time and resources to expand
our capabilities in this area. Currently, third party
manufacturers supply substantially all of our clinical
requirements for small molecules. If these manufacturers fail to
deliver sufficient quantities of such drug candidates in a
timely and cost-effective manner, it could adversely affect our
small molecule drug discovery efforts. If we decide to
manufacture clinical or commercial supplies of any small
molecule drugs in our own facilities, we will need to invest
substantial additional funds and recruit qualified personnel to
develop our small molecule manufacturing capabilities.
Adverse
safety events can negatively affect our business and stock
price.
Adverse safety events involving our marketed products may have a
negative impact on our commercialization efforts. Later
discovery of safety issues with our products that were not known
at the time of their approval by the FDA could cause product
liability events, additional regulatory scrutiny and
requirements for additional labeling, withdrawal of products
from the market and the imposition of fines or criminal
penalties. Any of these actions could result in, among other
things, material write-offs of inventory and impairments of
intangible assets, goodwill and fixed assets. In addition, the
reporting of adverse safety events involving our products and
public rumors about such events could cause our stock price to
decline or experience periods of volatility.
50
We
depend, to a significant extent, on reimbursement from third
party payors and a reduction in the extent of reimbursement
could reduce our product sales and revenue.
Sales of our products are dependent, in large part, on the
availability and extent of reimbursement from government health
administration authorities, private health insurers and other
organizations. Changes in government regulations or private
third-party payors reimbursement policies may reduce
reimbursement for our products and adversely affect our future
results.
The U.S. Congress recently enacted legislation to reform
the health care system. While this legislation will, over time,
increase the number of patients who have insurance coverage for
our products, it also imposes cost containment measures that
adversely affect the amount of reimbursement for our products.
These measures include increasing the minimum rebates for our
drugs covered by Medicaid programs and extending such rebates to
drugs dispensed to Medicaid beneficiaries enrolled in Medicaid
managed care organizations as well as expansion of the 340(B)
Public Health Services drug discount program.
Some states are also considering legislation that would control
the prices of drugs, and state Medicaid programs are
increasingly requesting manufacturers to pay supplemental
rebates and requiring prior authorization by the state program
for use of any drug for which supplemental rebates are not being
paid. Managed care organizations continue to seek price
discounts and, in some cases, to impose restrictions on the
coverage of particular drugs. Government efforts to reduce
Medicaid expenses may lead to increased use of managed care
organizations by Medicaid programs. This may result in managed
care organizations influencing prescription decisions for a
larger segment of the population and a corresponding constraint
on prices and reimbursement for our products. It is likely that
federal and state legislatures and health agencies will continue
to focus on additional health care reform in the future.
We encounter similar regulatory and legislative issues in most
other countries. In the European Union and some other
international markets, the government provides health care at
low cost to consumers and regulates pharmaceutical prices,
patient eligibility or reimbursement levels to control costs for
the government-sponsored health care system. This international
system of price regulations may limit or reduce our prices or
lead to inconsistent prices. Within the European Union and in
other countries, the availability of our products in some
markets at lower prices undermines our sales in some markets
with higher prices. Additionally, certain countries set prices
by reference to the prices in other countries where our products
are marketed. Thus, our inability to secure adequate prices in a
particular country may also impair our ability to obtain
acceptable prices in existing and potential new markets. This
may create the opportunity for third party cross border trade or
influence our decision to sell or not to sell a product, thus
affecting our geographic expansion plans. In addition, we expect
to see continued efforts to reduce healthcare costs in our
international markets. For example, the German government is
expected during the second half of 2010 to implement measures
that, among other things, increase mandatory discounts and
impose a three year price freeze on pharmaceuticals based on
2009 pricing.
When a new medical product is approved, the availability of
government and private reimbursement for that product is
uncertain, as is the amount for which that product will be
reimbursed. We cannot predict the availability or amount of
reimbursement for our product candidates.
We
depend on collaborators for both product and royalty revenue and
the clinical development of future collaboration products, which
are outside of our full control.
Collaborations between companies on products or programs are a
common business practice in the biotechnology industry.
Out-licensing typically allows a partner to collect up front
payments and future milestone payments, share the costs of
clinical development and risk of failure at various points, and
access sales and marketing infrastructure and expertise in
exchange for certain financial rights to the product or program
going to the in-licensing partner. In addition, the obligation
of in-licensees to pay royalties or share profits generally
terminates upon expiration of the related patents. We have a
number of collaborators and
51
partners, and have both in-licensed and out-licensed several
products and programs. These collaborations are subject to
several risks:
|
|
|
|
|
we are not fully in control of the royalty or profit sharing
revenues we receive from collaborators, which may be adversely
affected by patent expirations, pricing or health care reforms,
other legal and regulatory developments, the introduction of
competitive products, and new indication approvals which may
affect the sales of collaboration products;
|
|
|
|
any failure on the part of our collaboration partners to comply
with applicable laws and regulatory requirements in the sale and
marketing of our products could have an adverse effect on our
revenues as well as involve us in possible legal
proceedings; and
|
|
|
|
collaborations often require the parties to cooperate, and
failure to do so effectively could have an adverse impact on
product sales by our collaborators and partners, and could
adversely affect the clinical development of products or
programs under joint control.
|
In addition, under our collaboration agreement with Genentech,
the successful development and commercialization of the first
anti-CD20 product acquired or developed by Genentech will
decrease our percentage of the collaborations co-promotion
profits.
If we
do not successfully execute our growth initiatives through the
acquisition, partnering and in-licensing of products,
technologies or companies, our future performance could be
adversely affected.
We anticipate growing through internal development projects as
well as external opportunities, which include the acquisition,
partnering and in-licensing of products, technologies and
companies or the entry into strategic alliances and
collaborations. The availability of high quality opportunities
is limited and we are not certain that we will be able to
identify candidates that we and our shareholders consider
suitable or complete transactions on terms that are acceptable
to us and our shareholders. In order to pursue such
opportunities, we may require significant additional financing,
which may not be available to us on favorable terms, if at all.
Even if we are able to successfully identify and complete
acquisitions, we may not be able to integrate them or take full
advantage of them and therefore may not realize the benefits
that we expect. In addition, third parties may be reluctant to
partner with us due to the uncertainty created by the presence
on our Board of Directors of three individuals nominated by an
activist shareholder and the possibility that activist
shareholders may gain additional representation on or control of
our Board of Directors. If we are unsuccessful in our external
growth program, we may not be able to grow our business
significantly and we may incur asset impairment charges as a
result of acquisitions that are not successful.
If we
fail to comply with the extensive legal and regulatory
requirements affecting the health care industry, we could face
increased costs, penalties and a loss of business.
Our activities, and the activities of our collaborators and
third party providers, are subject to extensive government
regulation and oversight both in the U.S. and in foreign
jurisdictions. The FDA and comparable agencies in other
jurisdictions directly regulate many of our most critical
business activities, including the conduct of preclinical and
clinical studies, product manufacturing, advertising and
promotion, product distribution, adverse event reporting and
product risk management. States increasingly have been placing
greater restrictions on the marketing practices of health care
companies. In addition, pharmaceutical and biotechnology
companies have been the target of lawsuits and investigations
alleging violations of government regulation, including claims
asserting submission of incorrect pricing information,
impermissible off-label promotion of pharmaceutical products,
payments intended to influence the referral of federal or state
health care business, submission of false claims for government
reimbursement, antitrust violations, or violations related to
environmental matters. Violations of governmental regulation may
be punishable by criminal and civil sanctions, including fines
and civil monetary penalties and exclusion from participation in
government programs, including Medicare and Medicaid. In
addition to penalties for violation of laws and regulations, we
could be required to repay amounts we received from government
payors, or pay additional rebates and interest if we are found
to have miscalculated the pricing information we have submitted
to the government.
52
Whether or not we have complied with the law, an investigation
into alleged unlawful conduct could increase our expenses,
damage our reputation, divert management time and attention and
adversely affect our business.
If we
fail to meet the stringent requirements of governmental
regulation in the manufacture of our products, we could incur
substantial costs and a reduction in sales.
We and our third party providers are generally required to
maintain compliance with current Good Manufacturing Practice and
are subject to inspections by the FDA or comparable agencies in
other jurisdictions to confirm such compliance. In addition, the
FDA must approve any significant changes to our suppliers or
manufacturing methods. If we or our third party service
providers cannot demonstrate ongoing current Good Manufacturing
Practice compliance, we may be required to withdraw or recall
product, interrupt commercial supply of our products or seek
more costly manufacturing alternatives. Any delay, interruption
or other issues that arise in the manufacture, fill-finish,
packaging, or storage of our products as a result of a failure
of our facilities or the facilities or operations of third
parties to pass any regulatory agency inspection could
significantly impair our ability to develop and commercialize
our products. Significant noncompliance could also result in the
imposition of monetary penalties or other civil or criminal
sanctions. This non-compliance could increase our costs, cause
us to lose revenue or market share and damage our reputation.
Changes
in laws affecting the health care industry could adversely
affect our revenues and profitability.
We and our collaborators and third party providers operate in a
highly regulated industry. As a result, governmental actions may
adversely affect our business, operations or financial
condition, including:
|
|
|
|
|
new laws, regulations or judicial decisions, or new
interpretations of existing laws, regulations or decisions,
related to health care availability, method of delivery and
payment for health care products and services;
|
|
|
|
changes in the FDA and foreign regulatory approval processes
that may delay or prevent the approval of new products and
result in lost market opportunity;
|
|
|
|
changes in FDA and foreign regulations that may require
additional safety monitoring, labeling changes, restrictions on
product distribution or use, or other measures after the
introduction of our products to market, which could increase our
costs of doing business, adversely affect the future permitted
uses of approved products, or otherwise adversely affect the
market for our products;
|
|
|
|
new laws, regulations and judicial decisions affecting pricing
or marketing practices; and
|
|
|
|
changes in the tax laws relating to our operations.
|
The enactment in the U.S. of health care reform, potential
regulations easing the entry of competing follow-on biologics in
the marketplace, new legislation or implementation of existing
statutory provisions on importation of lower-cost competing
drugs from other jurisdictions, and legislation on comparative
effectiveness research are examples of previously enacted and
possible future changes in laws that could adversely affect our
business. In addition, the Food and Drug Administration
Amendments Act of 2007 included new authorization for the FDA to
require post-market safety monitoring, along with an expanded
clinical trials registry and clinical trials results database,
and expanded authority for the FDA to impose civil monetary
penalties on companies that fail to meet certain commitments.
Problems
with manufacturing or with inventory planning could result in
inventory shortages, product recalls and increased
costs.
Biologics manufacturing is extremely susceptible to product loss
due to contamination, equipment failure, or vendor or operator
error. In addition, we may need to close a manufacturing
facility for an extended period of time due to microbial, viral
or other contamination. Any of these events could result in
shipment delays or product recalls, impairing our ability to
supply products in existing markets or expand into new markets.
In the past, we have taken inventory write-offs and incurred
other charges and expenses for products that failed to meet
specifications, and we may incur similar charges in the future.
53
We rely solely on our manufacturing facility in Research
Triangle Park, North Carolina for the production of TYSABRI. Our
global bulk supply of TYSABRI depends on the uninterrupted and
efficient operation of this facility, which could be adversely
affected by equipment failures, labor shortages (whether as a
result of pandemic flu outbreak or otherwise), natural
disasters, power failures and numerous other factors. If we are
unable to meet demand for TYSABRI for any reason, we would need
to rely on a limited number of qualified third party contract
manufacturers. We cannot be certain that we could reach
agreement on reasonable terms, if at all, with those
manufacturers or that the FDA would approve our use of such
manufacturers on a timely basis, if at all. Moreover, the
transition of our manufacturing process to a third party could
take a significant amount of time, involve significant expense
and increase our manufacturing costs.
Our
investments in properties, including our manufacturing
facilities, may not be fully realizable.
We own or lease real estate primarily consisting of buildings
that contain research laboratories, office space, and biologic
manufacturing operations, some of which are located in markets
that are experiencing high vacancy rates and decreasing property
values. If we decide to consolidate or co-locate certain aspects
of our business operations, for strategic or other operational
reasons, we may dispose of one or more of our properties.
Due to reduced expectations of product demand, improved yields
on production and other factors, we may not fully utilize our
manufacturing facilities at normal levels resulting in idle time
at facilities or substantial excess manufacturing capacity. We
are always evaluating our current manufacturing strategy, and
may pursue alternatives that include delaying the completion of
a manufacturing facility in Denmark or disposing of
manufacturing facilities.
If any of our owned properties are held for sale and we
determine that the fair value of the properties is lower than
their book value, we may not realize the full investment in
these properties and incur significant impairment charges. In
addition, if we decide to fully or partially vacate a leased
property, we may incur significant cost, including lease
termination fees, rent expense in excess of sublease income and
impairment of leasehold improvements.
We
rely on third parties to provide services in connection with the
manufacture of our products and, in some instances, manufacture
the product itself.
We rely on Genentech for all RITUXAN manufacturing. Genentech
relies on a third party to manufacture certain bulk RITUXAN
requirements. If Genentech or any third party upon which it
relies does not manufacture or fill-finish RITUXAN in sufficient
quantities and on a timely and cost-effective basis, or if
Genentech or any third party does not obtain and maintain all
required manufacturing approvals, our business could be harmed.
We also source all of our fill-finish and the majority of our
final product storage operations, along with a substantial
portion of our packaging operations, to a concentrated group of
third party contractors. Any third party we use to fill-finish,
package or store our products to be sold in the U.S. must
be licensed by the FDA. As a result, alternative third party
providers may not be readily available on a timely basis or, if
available, may be more costly than current providers. The
manufacture of products and product components, fill-finish,
packaging and storage of our products require successful
coordination among us and multiple third party providers. Our
inability to coordinate these efforts, the lack of capacity
available at a third party contractor or any other problems with
the operations of these third party contractors could require us
to delay shipment of saleable products; recall products
previously shipped or impair our ability to supply products at
all. This could increase our costs, cause us to lose revenue or
market share, diminish our profitability or damage our
reputation.
Due to the unique manner in which our products are manufactured,
we rely on single source providers of several raw materials. We
make efforts to qualify new vendors and to develop contingency
plans so that production is not impacted by short-term issues
associated with single source providers. Nonetheless, our
business could be materially impacted by long-term or chronic
issues associated with single source providers.
54
Our
effective tax rate may fluctuate and we may incur obligations in
tax jurisdictions in excess of accrued amounts.
As a global biotechnology company, we are subject to taxation in
numerous countries, states and other jurisdictions. As a result,
our effective tax rate is derived from a combination of
applicable tax rates in the various places that we operate. In
preparing our financial statements, we estimate the amount of
tax that will become payable in each of such places. Our
effective tax rate, however, may be different than experienced
in the past due to numerous factors, including changes in the
mix of our profitability from country to country, the results of
audits of our tax filings, changes in accounting for income
taxes and changes in tax laws. Any of these factors could cause
us to experience an effective tax rate significantly different
from previous periods or our current expectations, which could
have an effect on our business and results of operations.
In addition, our inability to secure or sustain acceptable
arrangements with tax authorities and previously enacted or
future changes in the tax laws, among other things, may require
us to accrue for future tax payments in excess of amounts
accrued in our financial statements
The Obama administration announced several proposals to reform
U.S. tax rules, including proposals that may reduce or
eliminate the deferral of U.S. income tax on our
unrepatriated earnings, potentially requiring those earnings to
be taxed at the U.S. federal income tax rate, reduce or
eliminate our ability to claim foreign tax credits, and
eliminate various tax deductions until foreign earnings are
repatriated to the U.S. Our future reported financial
results may be adversely affected by tax rule changes which
restrict or eliminate our ability to claim foreign tax credits
or deduct expenses attributable to foreign earnings, or
otherwise affect the treatment of our unrepatriated earnings.
The
growth of our business depends on our ability to attract and
retain qualified personnel and key relationships.
The achievement of our commercial, research and development and
external growth objectives depends upon our ability to attract
and retain qualified scientific, manufacturing, sales and
marketing and executive personnel and develop and maintain
relationships with qualified clinical researchers and key
distributors. Competition for these people and relationships is
intense and comes from a variety of sources, including
pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies, universities and
non-profit research organizations. It may be more difficult for
us to attract and retain these people and relationships due to
the uncertainty created by the presence on our Board of
Directors of three individuals nominated by an activist
shareholder and the possibility that activist shareholders may
gain additional representation on or control of our Board of
Directors.
We are currently conducting searches for successors to our Chief
Executive Officer, who will retire in June 2010, and our
President, Research and Development, who retired in October
2009. Recruiting qualified candidates for such senior executive
positions within the life sciences industry when there have been
three successive proxy contests for elections of our Board of
Directors is challenging. In addition, it may be more difficult
for us to recruit and retain other personnel as we continue to
search for successors to our Chief Executive Officer and
President, Research and Development.
Our
sales and operations are subject to the risks of doing business
internationally.
We are increasing our presence in international markets, which
subjects us to many risks, such as:
|
|
|
|
|
economic problems that disrupt foreign health care payment
systems;
|
|
|
|
fluctuations in currency exchange rates;
|
|
|
|
difficulties in staffing and managing international operations;
|
|
|
|
the imposition of governmental controls;
|
|
|
|
less favorable intellectual property or other applicable laws;
|
|
|
|
the inability to obtain any necessary foreign regulatory or
pricing approvals of products in a timely manner;
|
55
|
|
|
|
|
restrictions on direct investments by foreign entities and trade
restrictions;
|
|
|
|
Changes in tax laws and tariffs; and
|
|
|
|
longer payment cycles.
|
In addition, our international operations are subject to
regulation under U.S. law. For example, the Foreign Corrupt
Practices Act prohibits U.S. companies and their
representatives from offering, promising, authorizing or making
payments to foreign officials for the purpose of obtaining or
retaining business abroad. In many countries, the health care
professionals we regularly interact with may meet the definition
of a foreign official for purposes of the Foreign Corrupt
Practices Act. Failure to comply with domestic or foreign laws
could result in various adverse consequences, including possible
delay in approval or refusal to approve a product, recalls,
seizures, withdrawal of an approved product from the market, and
the imposition of civil or criminal sanctions.
Recent
proxy contests have been costly and disruptive, and the presence
of directors nominated by an activist shareholder and the
possibility that activist shareholders may gain additional
representation on or control of our Board of Directors could
cause uncertainty about the direction of our
business.
Entities affiliated with Carl Icahn have commenced proxy
contests in each of the past three years. These proxy contests
have been disruptive to our operations and caused us to incur
substantial costs. The SEC has recently proposed to give
shareholders the ability to include director nominees and
proposals relating to a shareholder nomination process in
company proxy materials, which would make it easier for
activists to nominate directors to our Board of Directors. If
the SEC implements its proxy access proposal, we may face an
increase in the number of shareholder nominees for election to
our Board of Directors. Future proxy contests could be costly
and time-consuming, disrupt our operations and divert the
attention of management and our employees from executing our
strategic plans.
As a result of our proxy contests with the Icahn entities, three
of their director nominees have been elected to our Board of
Directors. Another activist shareholder has also publicly
advocated for certain changes at our company. These and other
existing or potential shareholders may attempt to gain
additional representation on or control of our Board of
Directors, the possibility of which may create uncertainty
regarding the direction of our business. Perceived uncertainties
as to our future direction may result in the loss of potential
acquisitions, collaborations or in-licensing opportunities, and
may make it more difficult to attract and retain qualified
personnel and business partners. In addition, disagreement among
our directors about the direction of our business could impair
our ability to effectively execute our strategic plan.
If we
are unable to adequately protect and enforce our intellectual
property rights, our competitors may take advantage of our
development efforts or our acquired technology.
We have filed numerous patent applications in the U.S. and
various other countries seeking protection of the processes,
products and other inventions originating from our research and
development. Patents have been issued on many of these
applications. We have also obtained rights to various patents
and patent applications under licenses with third parties, which
provide for the payment of royalties by us. The ultimate degree
of patent protection that will be afforded to biotechnology
products and processes, including ours, in the U.S. and in
other important markets remains uncertain and is dependent upon
the scope of protection decided upon by the patent offices,
courts and lawmakers in these countries. Our patents may not
afford us substantial protection or commercial benefit.
Similarly, our pending patent applications or patent
applications licensed from third parties may not ultimately be
granted as patents and we may not prevail if patents that have
been issued to us are challenged in court. In addition, pending
legislation to reform the patent system and court decisions or
patent office regulations that place additional restrictions on
patent claims or that facilitate patent challenges could also
reduce our ability to protect our intellectual property rights.
If we cannot prevent others from exploiting our inventions, we
will not derive the benefit from them that we currently expect.
We also rely upon unpatented trade secrets and other proprietary
information, and we cannot assure that others will not
independently develop substantially equivalent proprietary
information and techniques or otherwise gain access to our trade
secrets or disclose such technology, or that we can meaningfully
protect
56
such rights. We require our employees, consultants, outside
scientific collaborators, scientists whose research we sponsor
and other advisers to execute confidentiality agreements upon
the commencement of employment or consulting relationships with
us. These agreements may not provide meaningful protection or
adequate remedies for our unpatented proprietary information in
the event of use or disclosure of such information.
If our
products infringe the intellectual property rights of others, we
may incur damages and be required to incur the expense of
obtaining a license.
A substantial number of patents have already been issued to
other biotechnology and pharmaceutical companies. To the extent
that valid third party patent rights cover our products or
services, we or our strategic collaborators would be required to
seek licenses from the holders of these patents in order to
manufacture, use or sell these products and services, and
payments under them would reduce our profits from these products
and services. We are currently unable to predict the extent to
which we may wish or be required to acquire rights under such
patents and the availability and cost of acquiring such rights,
or whether a license to such patents will be available on
acceptable terms or at all. There may be patents in the
U.S. or in foreign countries or patents issued in the
future that are unavailable to license on acceptable terms. Our
inability to obtain such licenses may hinder our ability to
manufacture and market our products.
Uncertainty
over intellectual property in the biotechnology industry has
been the source of litigation, which is inherently costly and
unpredictable.
We are aware that others, including various universities and
companies working in the biotechnology field, have filed patent
applications and have been granted patents in the U.S. and
in other countries claiming subject matter potentially useful to
our business. Some of those patents and patent applications
claim only specific products or methods of making such products,
while others claim more general processes or techniques useful
or now used in the biotechnology industry. There is considerable
uncertainty within the biotechnology industry about the
validity, scope and enforceability of many issued patents in the
U.S. and elsewhere in the world, and, to date, there is no
consistent policy regarding the breadth of claims allowed in
biotechnology patents. We cannot currently determine the
ultimate scope and validity of patents which may be granted to
third parties in the future or which patents might be asserted
to be infringed by the manufacture, use and sale of our products.
There has been, and we expect that there may continue to be,
significant litigation in the industry regarding patents and
other intellectual property rights. Litigation and
administrative proceedings concerning patents and other
intellectual property rights may be protracted, expensive and
distracting to management. Competitors may sue us as a way of
delaying the introduction of our products. Any litigation,
including any interference proceedings to determine priority of
inventions, oppositions to patents in foreign countries or
litigation against our partners may be costly and time consuming
and could harm our business. We expect that litigation may be
necessary in some instances to determine the validity and scope
of certain of our proprietary rights. Litigation may be
necessary in other instances to determine the validity, scope or
non-infringement of certain patent rights claimed by third
parties to be pertinent to the manufacture, use or sale of our
products. Ultimately, the outcome of such litigation could
adversely affect the validity and scope of our patent or other
proprietary rights or hinder our ability to manufacture and
market our products.
Pending
and future product liability claims may adversely affect our
business and our reputation.
The administration of drugs in humans, whether in clinical
studies or commercially, carries the inherent risk of product
liability claims whether or not the drugs are actually the cause
of an injury. Our products or product candidates may cause, or
may appear to have caused, injury or dangerous drug
interactions, and we may not learn about or understand those
effects until the product or product candidate has been
administered to patients for a prolonged period of time.
We are subject from time to time to lawsuits based on product
liability and related claims. We cannot predict with certainty
the eventual outcome of any pending or future litigation. We may
not be successful in defending ourselves in the litigation and,
as a result, our business could be materially harmed. These
lawsuits may result in large judgments or settlements against
us, any of which could have a negative effect on our
57
financial condition and business if in excess of our insurance
coverage. Additionally, lawsuits can be expensive to defend,
whether or not they have merit, and the defense of these actions
may divert the attention of our management and other resources
that would otherwise be engaged in managing our business.
Our
operating results are subject to significant
fluctuations.
Our quarterly revenues, expenses and net income (loss) have
fluctuated in the past and are likely to fluctuate significantly
in the future due to the timing of charges and expenses that we
may take. In recent periods, for instance, we have recorded
charges that include:
|
|
|
|
|
impairments that we are required to take with respect to
investments;
|
|
|
|
impairments that we are required to take with respect to fixed
assets, including those that are recorded in connection with the
sale of fixed assets;
|
|
|
|
inventory write-downs for failed quality specifications, charges
for excess or obsolete inventory and charges for inventory write
downs relating to product suspensions;
|
|
|
|
milestone payments under license and collaboration agreements;
|
|
|
|
payments in connection with acquisitions and other business
development activity; and
|
|
|
|
the cost of restructurings.
|
Our revenues are also subject to foreign exchange rate
fluctuations due to the global nature of our operations. We
recognize foreign currency gains or losses arising from our
operations in the period in which we incur those gains or
losses. Although we have foreign currency forward contracts to
hedge specific forecasted transactions denominated in foreign
currencies, our efforts to reduce currency exchange losses may
not be successful. As a result, currency fluctuations among our
reporting currency, the U.S. dollar, and the currencies in
which we do business will affect our operating results, often in
unpredictable ways. Additionally, our net income may fluctuate
due to the impact of charges we may be required to take with
respect to foreign currency hedge transactions. In particular,
we may incur higher charges from hedge ineffectiveness than we
expect or from the termination of a hedge relationship.
These examples are only illustrative and other risks, including
those discussed in these Risk Factors, could also
cause fluctuations in our reported earnings. In addition, our
operating results during any one period do not necessarily
suggest the anticipated results of future periods.
Credit
and financial market conditions may exacerbate certain risks
affecting our business.
Sales of our products are dependent on reimbursement from
government health administration authorities, private health
insurers, distribution partners and other organizations. As a
result of credit and financial market conditions, these
organizations may be unable to satisfy their reimbursement
obligations or may delay payment. In addition, federal and state
health authorities may reduce Medicare and Medicaid
reimbursements, and private insurers may increase their scrutiny
of claims. A reduction in the availability or extent of
reimbursement could reduce our product sales and revenue.
We rely on third parties for several important aspects of our
business, including portions of our product manufacturing,
royalty revenue, clinical development of future collaboration
products, conduct of clinical trials, and raw materials. Such
third parties may be unable to satisfy their commitments to us
due to tightening of global credit from time to time, which
would adversely affect our business.
Our
portfolio of marketable securities is significant and subject to
market, interest and credit risk that may reduce its
value.
We maintain a significant portfolio of marketable securities.
Changes in the value of this portfolio could adversely affect
our earnings. In particular, the value of our investments may
decline due to increases in interest rates, downgrades in the
corporate bonds and other securities included in our portfolio,
instability in the global financial markets that reduces the
liquidity of securities included in our portfolio, declines in
the
58
value of collateral underlying the mortgage and asset-backed
securities included in our portfolio, and other factors. Each of
these events may cause us to record charges to reduce the
carrying value of our investment portfolio or sell investments
for less than our acquisition cost. Although we attempt to
mitigate these risks by investing in high quality securities and
continuously monitoring our portfolios overall risk
profile, the value of our investments may nevertheless decline.
Our
level of indebtedness could adversely affect our business and
limit our ability to plan for or respond to changes in our
business.
As of March 31, 2010, we had $1.1 billion of
outstanding indebtedness, and we may incur additional debt in
the future. Our level of indebtedness could adversely affect our
business by, among other things:
|
|
|
|
|
requiring us to dedicate a substantial portion of our cash flow
from operations to payments on our indebtedness, thereby
reducing the availability of our cash flow for other purposes,
including business development efforts and research and
development;
|
|
|
|
limiting our flexibility in planning for, or reacting to,
changes in our business and the industry in which we operate,
thereby placing us at a competitive disadvantage compared to our
competitors that may have less debt; and
|
|
|
|
increasing our vulnerability to general adverse economic and
industry conditions.
|
Our
business involves environmental risks, which include the cost of
compliance and the risk of contamination or
injury.
Our business and the business of several of our strategic
partners, including Genentech and Elan, involves the controlled
use of hazardous materials, chemicals, biologics and radioactive
compounds. Although we believe that our safety procedures for
handling and disposing of such materials comply with state and
federal standards, there will always be the risk of accidental
contamination or injury. By law, radioactive materials may only
be disposed of at state-approved facilities. We currently store
radioactive materials from our California laboratory
on-site
because the approval of a disposal site in California for all
California-based companies has been delayed indefinitely. If and
when a disposal site is approved, we may incur substantial costs
related to the disposal of these materials. If we were to become
liable for an accident, or if we were to suffer an extended
facility shutdown, we could incur significant costs, damages and
penalties that could harm our business. Biologics manufacturing
also requires permits from government agencies for water supply
and wastewater discharge. If we do not obtain appropriate
permits, or permits for sufficient quantities of water and
wastewater, we could incur significant costs and limits on our
manufacturing volumes that could harm our business.
Several
aspects of our corporate governance and our collaboration
agreements may discourage a third party from attempting to
acquire us.
Several factors might discourage a takeover attempt that could
be viewed as beneficial to shareholders who wish to receive a
premium for their shares from a potential bidder. For example:
|
|
|
|
|
we are subject to Section 203 of the Delaware General
Corporation Law, which provides that we may not enter into a
business combination with an interested shareholder for a period
of three years after the date of the transaction in which the
person became an interested shareholder, unless the business
combination is approved in the manner prescribed in
Section 203;
|
|
|
|
our board of directors has the authority to issue, without a
vote or action of shareholders, shares of preferred stock and to
fix the price, rights, preferences and privileges of those
shares, each of which could be superior to the rights of holders
of common stock;
|
|
|
|
our collaboration agreement with Elan provides Elan with the
option to buy the rights to TYSABRI if we undergo a change of
control, which may limit our attractiveness to potential
acquirers;
|
59
|
|
|
|
|
our collaboration agreement with Genentech provides that, if we
undergo a change of control, within 90 days Genentech may
present an offer to us to purchase our rights to RITUXAN. If a
change of control were to occur in the future and Genentech were
to present an offer for the RITUXAN rights, we must either
accept Genentechs offer or purchase Genentechs
rights to RITUXAN on the same terms as its offer. If Genentech
presents such an offer, then they will be deemed concurrently to
have exercised a right, in exchange for a royalty on net sales
in the U.S. of any anti-CD20 product acquired or developed
by Genentech or any anti-CD20 product that Genentech licenses
from a third party that is developed under the agreement, to
purchase our interest in each such product;
|
|
|
|
our directors are elected to staggered terms, which prevents the
entire board from being replaced in any single year; and
|
|
|
|
advance notice is required for nomination of candidates for
election as a director and for proposals to be brought before an
annual meeting of shareholders.
|
|
|
Item 2.
|
Unregistered
Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
|
Issuer
Purchases of Equity Securities
The following table summarizes our common stock repurchase
activity during the first quarter of 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Number of
|
|
|
Approximate Dollar
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares Purchased
|
|
|
Value of Shares That
|
|
|
|
Total Number of
|
|
|
Average Price
|
|
|
as Part of Publicly
|
|
|
May Yet Be Purchased
|
|
|
|
Shares Purchased
|
|
|
Paid per Share
|
|
|
Announced Programs
|
|
|
Under Our Programs
|
|
Period
|
|
(#)
|
|
|
($)
|
|
|
(#)
|
|
|
($ in millions)
|
|
|
2009 Repurchase Program
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jan-10
|
|
|
4,199,200
|
|
|
|
53.63
|
|
|
|
4,199,200
|
|
|
|
352.4
|
|
Feb-10
|
|
|
2,933,495
|
|
|
|
53.79
|
|
|
|
2,933,495
|
|
|
|
194.6
|
|
Mar-10
|
|
|
3,372,203
|
|
|
|
57.71
|
|
|
|
3,372,203
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
10,504,898
|
|
|
|
54.98
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On October 20, 2009, we announced that our Board of
Directors authorized the repurchase of up to $1.0 billion
of our common stock with the objective of reducing shares
outstanding and returning excess cash to shareholders. This
repurchase program did not have an expiration date and was
completed during the first quarter of 2010.
On April 20, 2010, we announced that our Board of Directors
authorized the repurchase of up to $1.5 billion of our
common stock. This new authorization is intended to continue to
reduce our shares outstanding with the objective of returning
excess cash to shareholders. We intend to retire these shares
following repurchase on the open market. This repurchase
authorization does not have an expiration date. As of
April 20, 2010, no shares have been repurchased under this
new program. The number of shares that will be repurchased under
this program is subject to price fluctuations of our common
stock.
The exhibits listed on the Exhibit Index immediately
preceding such exhibits, which is incorporated herein by
reference, are filed or furnished as part of this Quarterly
Report on
Form 10-Q.
60
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on
its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
BIOGEN IDEC INC.
Paul J. Clancy
Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer
April 20, 2010
61
EXHIBIT INDEX
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
Number*
|
|
Description of Exhibit
|
|
10.1+
|
|
Form of cash-settled performance shares award agreement under
the 2008 Omnibus Equity Plan.
|
10.2+
|
|
Form of market stock unit award agreement under the 2008 Omnibus
Equity Plan.
|
10.3+
|
|
Biogen Idec Inc. 2006 Non-Employee Directors Equity Plan, as
amended.
|
10.4
|
|
Agreement among Biogen Idec and certain entities affiliated with
Carl C. Icahn. Filed as exhibit 99.1 to our Current Report on
Form 8-K filed on March 22, 2010.
|
31.1+
|
|
Certification of the Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to
Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
31.2+
|
|
Certification of the Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to
Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
32.1++
|
|
Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002.
|
101++
|
|
The following materials from Biogen Idec Inc.s Quarterly
Report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended March 31, 2010, formatted in XBRL
(Extensible Business Reporting Language): (i) the
Consolidated Statements of Income, (ii) the Consolidated
Balance Sheets, (iii) the Consolidated Statements of Cash
Flows, and (iv) Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements,
tagged as blocks of text.
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Unless otherwise indicated, exhibits were previously filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission under Commission File
Number 0-19311 and are incorporated herein by reference. |
|
+ |
|
Filed herewith |
|
++ |
|
Furnished herewith |