e10vq
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
|
|
|
þ |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13
or 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended February 26, 2010
or
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13
or 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission File No. 0-12867
3COM CORPORATION
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
|
|
94-2605794 |
|
|
|
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.) |
|
|
|
350 Campus Drive
Marlborough, Massachusetts
|
|
01752 |
|
|
|
(Address of principal executive offices)
|
|
(Zip Code) |
Registrants telephone number, including area code: (508) 323-1000
Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report: N/A
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for
such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period
that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes o No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer,
or non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large accelerated
filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
(Check one):
Large accelerated filer þ |
Accelerated filer o |
Non-accelerated filer o (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) | Smaller reporting company o |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act). Yes o No þ
As of March 26, 2010, 398,163,780 shares of the registrants common stock were outstanding.
3COM CORPORATION
QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q
FOR THE QUARTER ENDED FEBRUARY 28, 2010
TABLE OF CONTENTS
We use a 52 or 53 week fiscal year ending on the Friday nearest to May 31, with each fiscal quarter
ending on the Friday generally nearest August 31, November 30 and February 28. For presentation
purposes, the periods are shown as ending on August 31, November 30, February 28 and May 31, as
applicable. The entities comprising our H3C business follow a calendar year basis of reporting and
therefore results for our China-based sales segment are consolidated on a two-month time lag.
3Com, the 3Com logo, H3C, Digital Vaccine, NBX, OfficeConnect, Comware, IRF, TippingPoint,
TippingPoint Technologies and VCX are registered trademarks or trademarks of 3Com Corporation or
one of its wholly owned subsidiaries. Other product and brand names may be trademarks or
registered trademarks of their respective owners.
This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains forward-looking statements made pursuant to the safe
harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These forward-looking
statements include, without limitation, statements regarding the following aspects of our business:
global economic slowdown, nascent economic recovery and effects and strategy; core business
strategy to leverage China and emphasize larger enterprise business; China-based sales region
strategy, growth, dependence, expected benefits, tax rate, sales from China and expected decline in
sales to Huawei; impact of recent accounting regulations; expected annual amortization expense;
environment for enterprise networking equipment; challenges relating to sales growth; trends and
goals for segments and regions; pursuit of termination fee in connection with now-terminated
proposed acquisition by affiliates of Bain Capital; supply of components; research and development
focus; execution of our strategy; strategic product and technology development plans; goal of
sustaining profitability; short-term management of cash during economic slowdown and nascent
recovery; intercompany dividends from China; ability to satisfy cash requirements for at least the
next twelve months; restructuring activities and expected charges to be incurred; expected cost
savings from restructuring activities and integration; potential acquisitions and strategic
relationships; future contractual obligations; recovery of deferred tax assets and balance of
unrecognized tax benefits; reserves; market risk; outsourcing; competition; expectation regarding
base interest rates; impact of foreign currency fluctuations; belief regarding meritorious defenses
to litigation claims and effects of litigation; the ability of our company and Hewlett-Packard
Company (HP) to consummate the announced acquisition of our company by HP (the Merger);
satisfaction of closing conditions precedent to the consummation of the proposed Merger, including
obtaining antitrust approvals in China; the affect on our business,
operations and financial results of the announcement, the pendency, and activities relating to the
Merger; and the affect of certain restrictions on our ability to conduct our business under the
acquisition agreement with HP. In some cases, you can identify these and other forward-looking
statements by the use of words such as may, can, should, expects, plans, anticipates,
believes, estimates, predicts, intends, continue, or the negative of such terms, or other
comparable terminology. Forward-looking statements also include the assumptions underlying or
relating to any forward-looking statements.
Actual results could differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements
as a result of various factors, including, without limitation, those set forth under Part II Item
1A Risk Factors. All forward-looking statements included in this document are based on our
assessment of information available to us at the time this report is filed. We have no intent, and
disclaim any obligation, to update any forward-looking statements.
In this Form 10-Q we refer to the Peoples Republic of China as China or the PRC.
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
3COM CORPORATION
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
February 28, |
|
|
February 28, |
|
(In thousands, except per share data) |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Sales |
|
$ |
345,880 |
|
|
$ |
324,707 |
|
|
$ |
958,546 |
|
|
$ |
1,021,919 |
|
Cost of sales |
|
|
137,086 |
|
|
|
138,878 |
|
|
|
389,559 |
|
|
|
446,671 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
|
208,794 |
|
|
|
185,829 |
|
|
|
568,987 |
|
|
|
575,248 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses (income): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales and marketing |
|
|
100,543 |
|
|
|
85,541 |
|
|
|
279,085 |
|
|
|
262,943 |
|
Research and development |
|
|
47,997 |
|
|
|
45,229 |
|
|
|
128,365 |
|
|
|
141,630 |
|
General and administrative |
|
|
21,323 |
|
|
|
27,593 |
|
|
|
68,479 |
|
|
|
80,699 |
|
Amortization |
|
|
16,506 |
|
|
|
23,106 |
|
|
|
50,332 |
|
|
|
73,330 |
|
Patent dispute resolution |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(70,000 |
) |
Restructuring charges |
|
|
47 |
|
|
|
2,860 |
|
|
|
2,732 |
|
|
|
7,361 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses, net |
|
|
186,416 |
|
|
|
184,329 |
|
|
|
528,993 |
|
|
|
495,963 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
|
22,378 |
|
|
|
1,500 |
|
|
|
39,994 |
|
|
|
79,285 |
|
Interest income (expense), net |
|
|
683 |
|
|
|
(3,333 |
) |
|
|
(2,327 |
) |
|
|
(5,131 |
) |
Other income, net |
|
|
19,676 |
|
|
|
16,528 |
|
|
|
37,143 |
|
|
|
45,298 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes |
|
|
42,737 |
|
|
|
14,695 |
|
|
|
74,810 |
|
|
|
119,452 |
|
Income tax provision |
|
|
(1,346 |
) |
|
|
(12,828 |
) |
|
|
(5,966 |
) |
|
|
(24,878 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
41,391 |
|
|
$ |
1,867 |
|
|
$ |
68,844 |
|
|
$ |
94,574 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic net income per share |
|
$ |
0.10 |
|
|
$ |
0.00 |
|
|
$ |
0.17 |
|
|
$ |
0.24 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted net income per share |
|
$ |
0.10 |
|
|
$ |
0.00 |
|
|
$ |
0.17 |
|
|
$ |
0.24 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares used in computing per share amounts: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
396,253 |
|
|
|
384,679 |
|
|
|
392,905 |
|
|
|
393,868 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
|
411,546 |
|
|
|
386,377 |
|
|
|
403,771 |
|
|
|
395,232 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial
statements.
1
3COM CORPORATION
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
February 28, |
|
|
May 31, |
|
(In thousands, except per share data) |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and equivalents |
|
$ |
795,014 |
|
|
$ |
545,818 |
|
Short-term investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
98,357 |
|
Notes receivable |
|
|
26,688 |
|
|
|
40,590 |
|
Accounts receivable, less allowance for doubtful accounts
of $9,019 and $9,645, respectively |
|
|
129,998 |
|
|
|
112,771 |
|
Inventories |
|
|
114,972 |
|
|
|
90,395 |
|
Other current assets |
|
|
48,977 |
|
|
|
56,982 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
1,115,649 |
|
|
|
944,913 |
|
Property and equipment, less accumulated
depreciation of $176,652 and $172,717,
respectively |
|
|
36,747 |
|
|
|
40,012 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
609,297 |
|
|
|
609,297 |
|
Intangible assets, net |
|
|
148,432 |
|
|
|
198,624 |
|
Deposits and other assets |
|
|
22,823 |
|
|
|
22,511 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
1,932,948 |
|
|
$ |
1,815,357 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable |
|
$ |
74,907 |
|
|
$ |
68,350 |
|
Current portion of long-term debt |
|
|
48,000 |
|
|
|
48,000 |
|
Accrued liabilities and other |
|
|
484,388 |
|
|
|
394,103 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
607,295 |
|
|
|
510,453 |
|
Deferred taxes and long-term obligations |
|
|
37,218 |
|
|
|
40,729 |
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
64,000 |
|
|
|
152,000 |
|
Stockholders equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, $0.01 par value,
10,000 shares authorized; none
outstanding |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $0.01 par value,
990,000 shares authorized; shares
issued: 398,088 and 389,284,
respectively |
|
|
2,378,781 |
|
|
|
2,336,961 |
|
Retained deficit |
|
|
(1,221,678 |
) |
|
|
(1,290,522 |
) |
Accumulated other comprehensive income |
|
|
67,332 |
|
|
|
65,736 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
1,224,435 |
|
|
|
1,112,175 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
|
$ |
1,932,948 |
|
|
$ |
1,815,357 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
2
3COM CORPORATION
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
February 28, |
|
(In thousands) |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Cash flows from operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
68,844 |
|
|
$ |
94,574 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to cash
provided by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
66,467 |
|
|
|
97,156 |
|
Stock-based compensation expense |
|
|
17,579 |
|
|
|
18,187 |
|
Impairment of property and equipment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,150 |
|
Loss on property and equipment disposals |
|
|
288 |
|
|
|
581 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
(12,123 |
) |
|
|
(7,466 |
) |
Changes in assets and liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts and notes receivable |
|
|
(3,243 |
) |
|
|
(13,560 |
) |
Inventories |
|
|
(23,319 |
) |
|
|
(22,006 |
) |
Other assets |
|
|
15,667 |
|
|
|
6,771 |
|
Accounts payable |
|
|
6,247 |
|
|
|
(20,929 |
) |
Other liabilities |
|
|
88,393 |
|
|
|
41,874 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
224,800 |
|
|
|
196,332 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from maturities and sales of investments |
|
|
98,661 |
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of property and equipment |
|
|
(11,170 |
) |
|
|
(12,778 |
) |
Proceeds from sale of property and equipment |
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
223 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities |
|
|
87,531 |
|
|
|
(12,555 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuances of common stock |
|
|
28,480 |
|
|
|
3,022 |
|
Repurchases of common stock |
|
|
(4,158 |
) |
|
|
(51,383 |
) |
Repayment of long term debt |
|
|
(88,000 |
) |
|
|
(88,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in financing activities |
|
|
(63,678 |
) |
|
|
(136,361 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and equivalents |
|
|
543 |
|
|
|
8,901 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net change in cash and equivalents during period |
|
|
249,196 |
|
|
|
56,317 |
|
Cash and equivalents, beginning of period |
|
|
545,818 |
|
|
|
503,644 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and equivalents, end of period |
|
$ |
795,014 |
|
|
$ |
559,961 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
3
3COM CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
NOTE 1. BASIS OF PRESENTATION
The unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared pursuant to the rules
and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission. In the opinion of management, these
unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements include all adjustments necessary for a fair
presentation of our financial position as of February 26, 2010 and May 29, 2009, our results of
operations for the three and nine months ended February 26, 2010 and February 27, 2009 and our cash
flows for the nine months ended February 26, 2010 and February 27, 2009.
We use a 52 or 53 week fiscal year ending on the Friday nearest to May 31. For convenience, the
condensed consolidated financial statements have been shown as ending on the last day of the
calendar month. Accordingly, the three and nine months shown as ended February 28, 2010 actually
ended on February 26, 2010, the three and nine months shown as ended February 28, 2009 ended on
February 27, 2009, and the balance sheet presented as of February 28, 2010 and May 31, 2009
actually was as of February 26, 2010 and May 29, 2009, respectively. The results of operations for
the three and nine months ended February 28, 2010 may not be indicative of the results to be
expected for the fiscal year ending May 28, 2010 or any other future periods. These condensed
consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial
statements and related notes thereto included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
May 29, 2009.
Certain prior period amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current year presentation.
Specifically, in the condensed consolidated statements of operations we have reclassified $2.8
million from general and administrative expenses to sales and marketing, and to research and
development expenses, in the amounts of $1.3 million and $1.5 million, respectively, for the three
months ended February 28, 2009, and $8.1 million from general and administrative expenses to sales
and marketing, and to research and development expenses, in the amounts of $3.8 million and $4.3
million, respectively, for the nine months ended February 28, 2009.
Accounting Pronouncements The Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) is the authoritative
body for financial accounting and reporting in the United States. On July 31, 2009, the FASB
Accounting Standards Codification (the Codification) became the authoritative source of
accounting principles to be applied to the financial statements of nongovernmental entities
prepared in accordance with GAAP. The following is a list of recent pronouncements issued by the
FASB:
Recently Issued and Adopted Accounting Pronouncements
Business Combinations: Effective in the first quarter of fiscal 2010, the Company adopted the
revised accounting guidance for business combinations. The more significant changes include an
expanded definition of a business and a business combination; recognition of assets acquired,
liabilities assumed and noncontrolling interests (including goodwill) measured at fair value at the
acquisition date; recognition of acquisition-related expenses and restructuring costs separately
from the business combination; recognition of assets acquired and liabilities assumed at their
acquisition-date fair values with subsequent changes recognized in earnings; and capitalization of
in-process research and development at fair value as an indefinite-lived intangible asset. The
guidance also amends and clarifies the application issues on initial recognition and measurement,
subsequent measurement and accounting, and disclosure of assets and liabilities arising from
contingencies in a business combination. The impact of this accounting guidance and its relevant
updates on the Companys results of operations or financial position will vary depending on each
specific business combination or asset purchase. The Company has not had any business combinations
or asset purchases since the adoption of this pronouncement.
Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements: The pronouncement requires the
noncontrolling interest in the equity of a subsidiary be accounted for and reported as equity,
provides revised guidance on the treatment and presentation of net income and losses attributable
to the noncontrolling interest and changes in ownership interests in a subsidiary, and requires
additional disclosures that identify and distinguish between the interests of the controlling and
noncontrolling owners. The Company adopted the pronouncement in the first quarter of fiscal 2010.
The adoption did not have any impact on the Companys Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
4
Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures: The pronouncements define fair value, establish guidelines
for measuring fair value, and expand disclosures regarding fair value measurements. In the first
quarter of fiscal 2010, the Company adopted the fair value measurements guidance for all
nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities recognized or disclosed at fair value in the
financial statements on a nonrecurring basis. The adoption did not have a material impact on the
Companys Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements. See Note 3 of Notes to Condensed
Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information. The Company did not choose the fair
value option which allows entities to choose to measure many financial instruments and certain
other items at fair value that previously were not required to be measured at fair value.
In the second quarter of fiscal 2010, the Company adopted the fair value disclosure provision that
requires the reporting of interim disclosures about the fair value of financial instruments
previously only disclosed on an annual basis. The adoption did not have any impact on the Companys
Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements as it relates only to disclosures. The required
disclosures are included in Note 3 of Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
Impairments of Debt Securities: The pronouncement changed the impairment recognition and
presentation model for debt securities. An other-than-temporary impairment is now triggered when
there is intent to sell the security, it is more likely than not that the security will be required
to be sold before recovery in value, or the security is not expected to recover its entire
amortized cost basis (credit related loss). Credit related losses on debt securities will be
considered an other-than-temporary impairment recognized in earnings, and any other losses due to a
decline in fair value relative to the amortized cost deemed not to be other-than-temporary will be
recorded in other comprehensive income. The Company adopted the pronouncement in the second quarter
of fiscal 2010. The adoption did not have a material impact on the Companys Condensed Consolidated
Financial Statements.
Earnings Per Share: The pronouncement provided guidance on determining whether instruments granted
in share-based payment transactions are participating securities. Non-vested share-based payment
awards that contain non-forfeitable rights to dividends or dividend equivalents are participating
securities and, therefore, are included in computing earnings per share (EPS) pursuant to the
two-class method. The two-class method determines earnings per share for each class of common stock
and participating securities according to dividends or dividend equivalents and their respective
participation rights in undistributed earnings. The company adopted this pronouncement in the first
quarter of fiscal 2010. The adoption had no material effect on basic or diluted EPS for any of the
periods presented in these Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
Recently Issued but Not Yet Adopted Accounting Pronouncements
Revenue Arrangements with Multiple Deliverables: The guidance amends the current revenue
recognition guidance for multiple deliverable arrangements. It allows the use of managements best
estimate of selling price for individual elements of an arrangement when vendor specific objective
evidence, vendor objective evidence, or third-party evidence is unavailable. Additionally, it
eliminates the residual method of revenue recognition in accounting for multiple deliverable
arrangements. The guidance is effective for fiscal years beginning on or after June 15, 2010 (the
Companys fiscal 2012), but early adoption is permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the
impact that adoption of this pronouncement will have on the Companys Financial Statements.
Revenue Arrangements with Software Elements: The pronouncement modifies the scope of the software
revenue recognition guidance to exclude tangible products that contain both software and
non-software components that function together to deliver the products essential functionality.
The pronouncement is effective for fiscal years beginning on or after June 15, 2010 (the Companys
fiscal 2012), but early adoption is permitted. This guidance must be adopted in the same period an
entity adopts the amended revenue arrangements with multiple deliverables guidance described above.
The Company is currently evaluating the impact that adoption of this pronouncement will have on the
Companys Financial Statements.
Variable Interest Entities and Transfers of Financial Assets and Extinguishments of Liabilities:
The pronouncement on transfers of financial assets and extinguishments of liabilities removes the
concept of a qualifying special-purpose entity and removes the exception from applying variable
interest entity accounting to qualifying special-purpose entities. The new guidance on variable
interest entities requires an entity to perform an ongoing analysis to determine whether the
entitys variable interest or interests give it a controlling financial interest in a variable
interest entity. The pronouncements are effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15,
2009. The Company will adopt the pronouncements for interim and annual reporting periods beginning
in the first quarter of fiscal 2011. The Company expects that adoption of this pronouncement will
not have an impact on the Companys financial statements.
5
NOTE 2. STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION
In order to determine the fair value of stock options and employee stock purchase plan shares, we
use the Black-Scholes option pricing model and apply the single-option valuation approach to the
stock option valuation. In order to determine the fair value of restricted stock awards and
restricted stock units we use the closing market price of 3Com common stock on the date of grant.
We recognize stock-based compensation expense on a straight-line basis over the requisite service
period for time-based vesting awards of stock options, restricted stock awards, restricted stock
units, and the employee stock purchase plan. Certain of the stock options may vest on an
accelerated basis and certain restricted stock units are earned contingent upon the future
achievement of financial performance metrics. Performance metrics for the performance period are
determined by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors in its sole discretion. For
unvested stock options outstanding as of May 31, 2006, we continue to recognize stock-based
compensation expense using the accelerated attribution method.
As of February 28, 2010, total unrecognized stock-based compensation expense relating to unvested
employee stock options, restricted stock awards, restricted stock units, and the employee stock purchase
plan, as adjusted for estimated forfeitures, was $5.2 million, $1.5 million, $18.0 million and $0.2
million, respectively. These amounts are expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period
of 2.0 years for stock options, 1.2 years for restricted stock awards, 2.0 years for restricted
stock units and 0.1 years for employee stock purchase plan. If actual forfeitures differ from
current estimates, total unrecognized stock-based compensation expense will be adjusted for future
changes in estimated forfeitures.
Stock-based compensation recognized and disclosed is based on the Black-Scholes option pricing
model for estimating the fair value of options granted under the companys equity incentive plans.
The Black-Scholes option pricing model was developed for use in estimating the fair value of traded
options that have no vesting restrictions and are fully transferable. Option valuation models
require the input of highly subjective assumptions, including the expected stock price volatility.
The underlying weighted-average assumptions used in the Black-Scholes model and the resulting
estimates of fair value per share were as follows for options granted during the three and nine
months ended February 28, 2010 and February 28, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended February 28, |
|
Nine Months Ended February 28, |
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
Employee stock options: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Volatility |
|
|
* |
|
|
|
51.3 |
% |
|
|
57.0 |
% |
|
|
51.3 |
% |
Risk-free interest rate |
|
|
* |
|
|
|
1.9 |
% |
|
|
2.1 |
% |
|
|
2.6 |
% |
Dividend yield |
|
|
* |
|
|
|
0.0 |
% |
|
|
0.0 |
% |
|
|
0.0 |
% |
Expected life (years) |
|
|
* |
|
|
|
6.0 |
|
|
|
4.1 |
|
|
|
4.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average grant date fair value |
|
|
* |
|
|
$ |
1.28 |
|
|
$ |
1.83 |
|
|
$ |
1.04 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted stock awards: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average grant date fair value |
|
|
* |
|
|
$ |
* |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
$ |
2.28 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted stock units: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average grant date fair value |
|
$ |
7.49 |
|
|
$ |
2.51 |
|
|
$ |
4.20 |
|
|
$ |
2.35 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employee Stock Purchase Plan: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Volatility |
|
|
* |
% |
|
|
* |
% |
|
|
64.8 |
% |
|
|
77.7 |
% |
Risk-free interest rate |
|
|
* |
% |
|
|
* |
% |
|
|
0.2 |
% |
|
|
1.2 |
% |
Dividend yield |
|
|
* |
% |
|
|
* |
% |
|
|
0.0 |
% |
|
|
0.0 |
% |
Expected life (years) |
|
|
* |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average grant date fair value |
|
$ |
* |
|
|
$ |
* |
|
|
$ |
1.70 |
|
|
$ |
0.90 |
|
|
|
|
* |
|
No grants during the period |
6
The following table presents stock-based compensation expense included in the accompanying
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended February 28, |
|
|
Nine Months Ended February 28, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of sales |
|
$ |
557 |
|
|
$ |
596 |
|
|
$ |
1,688 |
|
|
$ |
1,916 |
|
Sales and marketing |
|
|
2,147 |
|
|
|
1,371 |
|
|
|
5,818 |
|
|
|
4,742 |
|
Research and development |
|
|
538 |
|
|
|
552 |
|
|
|
1,437 |
|
|
|
2,329 |
|
General and administrative |
|
|
3,219 |
|
|
|
3,144 |
|
|
|
8,636 |
|
|
|
8,756 |
|
Restructuring charges |
|
|
|
|
|
|
444 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
444 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock-based
compensation expense
before tax |
|
$ |
6,461 |
|
|
$ |
6,107 |
|
|
$ |
17,579 |
|
|
$ |
18,187 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock Options. Stock option activity for the nine months ended February 28, 2010 and 2009, was
as follows (shares in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended February 28, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
Number of |
|
|
average |
|
|
Number of |
|
|
average |
|
|
|
shares |
|
|
exercise price |
|
|
shares |
|
|
exercise price |
|
Outstanding May 31, 2009 and 2008 |
|
|
28,361 |
|
|
$ |
4.92 |
|
|
|
43,925 |
|
|
$ |
4.98 |
|
Granted |
|
|
2,419 |
|
|
|
4.00 |
|
|
|
1,403 |
|
|
|
2.30 |
|
Exercised |
|
|
(6,590 |
) |
|
|
3.99 |
|
|
|
(979 |
) |
|
|
1.48 |
|
Forfeited |
|
|
(326 |
) |
|
|
4.01 |
|
|
|
(3,239 |
) |
|
|
4.34 |
|
Expired |
|
|
(2,526 |
) |
|
|
6.12 |
|
|
|
(11,342 |
) |
|
|
5.39 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding February 28, 2010 and 2009 |
|
|
21,338 |
|
|
$ |
4.97 |
|
|
|
29,768 |
|
|
$ |
4.88 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of February 28, 2010, there were approximately 13.3 million options exercisable with a
weighted-average exercise price of $5.95 per share. By comparison, there were approximately 20.0
million options exercisable as of February 28, 2009 with a weighted-average price of $5.69 per
share.
During the nine months ended February 28, 2010 and 2009 approximately 6.6 million and 1.0 million
options were exercised at an aggregate intrinsic value of $13.7 million and $0.7 million,
respectively. The exercise intrinsic value is calculated as the difference between the market value
on the exercise date and the exercise price of the options. The closing market value as of February
26, 2010 was $7.63 per share as reported by the NASDAQ Global Select Market. The aggregate
intrinsic value of options outstanding and options exercisable as of February 28, 2010 was $72.8
million and $38.4 million, respectively. The weighted-average remaining contractual life of options
outstanding and options exercisable were 3.6 years and 2.6 years, respectively. The aggregate options
outstanding and options exercisable intrinsic value is calculated for options that are in-the-money
as the difference between the market value as of February 28, 2010 and the exercise price of the
options.
Options outstanding that are vested and expected to vest as of February 28, 2010 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
Number of |
|
average |
|
Remaining |
|
Aggregate |
|
|
Shares |
|
Grant-Date |
|
Contractual |
|
Intrinsic Value |
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Fair Value |
|
Life (in years) |
|
(in thousands) |
Vested and
expected to vest at
February 28, 2010 |
|
|
18,992 |
|
|
$ |
5.16 |
|
|
|
3.3 |
|
|
$ |
62,927 |
|
7
Restricted Stock Awards. Restricted stock award activity during the nine months ended February 28,
2010 and 2009 was as follows (shares in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended February 28, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
Number of |
|
|
average |
|
|
Number of |
|
|
average |
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Grant-Date |
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Grant-Date |
|
|
|
(unvested) |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
(unvested) |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
Outstanding May 31, 2009 and 2008 |
|
|
1,459 |
|
|
$ |
2.94 |
|
|
|
3,095 |
|
|
$ |
3.43 |
|
Granted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
325 |
|
|
|
2.28 |
|
Vested |
|
|
(337 |
) |
|
|
3.27 |
|
|
|
(734 |
) |
|
|
3.94 |
|
Forfeited |
|
|
(17 |
) |
|
|
4.64 |
|
|
|
(745 |
) |
|
|
3.75 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding February 28, 2010 and 2009 |
|
|
1,105 |
|
|
$ |
2.82 |
|
|
|
1,941 |
|
|
$ |
2.92 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During the nine months ended February 28, 2010 and 2009 approximately 0.3 million and 0.7 million
restricted stock awards with an aggregate fair value of $1.7 million and $1.6 million,
respectively, became vested. Total aggregate intrinsic value of restricted stock awards outstanding
as of February 28, 2010 was $8.4 million.
Restricted Stock Units. Restricted stock unit activity during the nine months ended February 28,
2010 and 2009 was as follows (shares in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended February 28, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
Number of |
|
|
average |
|
|
Number of |
|
|
average |
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Grant-Date |
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Grant-Date |
|
|
|
(unvested) |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
(unvested) |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
Outstanding May 31, 2009 and 2008 |
|
|
6,161 |
|
|
$ |
2.78 |
|
|
|
5,744 |
|
|
$ |
3.59 |
|
Granted |
|
|
6,062 |
|
|
|
4.20 |
|
|
|
5,071 |
|
|
|
2.35 |
|
Vested |
|
|
(2,192 |
) |
|
|
3.01 |
|
|
|
(2,445 |
) |
|
|
3.51 |
|
Forfeited |
|
|
(536 |
) |
|
|
3.40 |
|
|
|
(1,246 |
) |
|
|
3.16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding February 28, 2010 and 2009 |
|
|
9,495 |
|
|
$ |
3.60 |
|
|
|
7,124 |
|
|
$ |
2.81 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During the nine months ended February 28, 2010 and 2009 approximately 2.2 million and 2.4 million
restricted units with an aggregate fair value of $12.2 million and $5.4 million, respectively,
became vested. Total aggregate intrinsic value of restricted stock units outstanding at February
28, 2010 was $72.4 million. Restricted stock units outstanding at February 28, 2010 had a
weighted-average remaining contractual life of 1.3 years. Total aggregate intrinsic value of
restricted stock units outstanding and expected to vest at February 28, 2010 was $53.6 million.
Restricted stock units outstanding and expected to vest at February 28, 2010 had a weighted-average
remaining contractual life of 1.1 years.
Employee Stock Purchase Plan. We have an employee stock purchase plan (ESPP) under which
eligible employees may authorize payroll deductions of up to ten percent of their compensation, as
defined, to purchase common stock at a price of 85 percent of the lower of the fair market value as
of the beginning or the end of the six-month offering period. In September 2008, our stockholders
approved an increase of eight million shares available for issuance under the ESPP. We recognized
$1.4 million and $1.0 million of stock-based compensation expense in the nine months ended February
28, 2010 and 2009, respectively, associated with the ESPP. Employee stock purchases generally
occur only in the quarters ending November 30 and May 31.
8
NOTE 3: FAIR VALUE
Fair Value Hierarchy
The Companys financial instruments consist primarily of cash and cash equivalents, short-term
investments, accounts receivable, notes receivable, accounts payable, and long-term debt. The
carrying value of cash, short-term investments, accounts receivable, notes receivable and accounts
payable approximates their fair market values due to their short-term nature. The Company believes
that the carrying value of its outstanding debt approximates fair value, because the debt bears
interest at variable rates.
The accounting pronouncements establish a fair value hierarchy that requires an entity to maximize
the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value.
Observable inputs are obtained from independent sources and can be validated by a third party,
whereas unobservable inputs reflect assumptions regarding what a third party would use in pricing
an asset or liability. A financial instruments categorization within the fair value hierarchy is
based upon the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. The
accounting pronouncements establish three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value:
|
|
Level 1 Observable inputs that reflect quoted prices (unadjusted) for identical assets or
liabilities in active markets. |
|
|
|
Level 2 Include other inputs that are directly or indirectly observable in the
marketplace. |
|
|
|
Level 3 Unobservable inputs which are supported by little or no market activity. |
In accordance with the accounting pronouncements, we measure our cash equivalents at fair value and
classify them within Level 1 or Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy. The classification has been
determined based on the manner in which we value our cash equivalents, primarily using quoted
market prices or alternative pricing sources and models utilizing market observable inputs.
Assets Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis
Assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis consisted of the following types of instruments
and were reported as cash and equivalents as of February 28, 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurements at Reporting Date Using |
|
|
|
Quoted Prices |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
in Active |
|
|
Significant |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Markets for |
|
|
Other |
|
|
Significant |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Identical |
|
|
Observable |
|
|
Unobservable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Instruments |
|
|
Inputs |
|
|
Inputs |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
(Level 1) |
|
|
(Level 2) |
|
|
(Level 3) |
|
|
Balance |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and equivalents: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Time deposits and bank deposits
with a maturity less than 3
months |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
441,138 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
441,138 |
|
Money market fund deposits |
|
|
248,776 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
248,776 |
|
China government bonds and bank
bills with a maturity of less
than 3 months |
|
|
105,100 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
105,100 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets measured at fair value |
|
$ |
353,876 |
|
|
$ |
441,138 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
795,014 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Money market funds, China government bonds and bank bills are measured based on quoted market
prices. Time deposits and bank deposits are measured based on similar assets and/or subsequent
transactions.
NOTE 4. REALTEK PATENT DISPUTE RESOLUTION
On July 11, 2008, 3Com Corporation and Realtek Semiconductor Corp. (the Realtek Group) entered
into three agreements which document the resolution of a several-year-long patent litigation
between the parties and provide for the non-exclusive license by 3Com to the Realtek Group of
certain patents and related network interface technology for license fees totaling $70.0 million,
all of which was received in the three months ended August 31, 2008.
9
The basic agreement between 3Com and the Realtek Group documents the resolution of the litigation
between the parties and provides for the dismissal of the lawsuit and mutual releases between the
parties.
Under the terms of the agreements, the payments are non-refundable and the Company has no future
performance obligations, apart from certain customary covenants not to sue Realtek, its customers
or its suppliers on the licensed technology, and non-material notice and tax assistance
obligations. Accordingly the $70.0 million was recognized as income in the first quarter of
fiscal 2009 in the operating expense (income) section of the Consolidated Statement of
Operations.
NOTE 5. RESTRUCTURING CHARGES
In recent fiscal years, we have undertaken several initiatives involving significant changes in our
business strategy and cost structure.
We continued a restructuring of our business to enhance the focus and cost effectiveness of our
businesses in serving their respective markets. These restructuring efforts continued into fiscal
2010. We took the following specific actions in fiscal 2007 through 2010 (the Fiscal 2007 2010
Actions):
|
|
|
reduced our workforce; |
|
|
|
|
continued efforts to consolidate and dispose of excess facilities; and |
|
|
|
|
shifting the focus of our direct-touch sales force to accommodate our shift to
the enterprise market |
Restructuring charges related to these various initiatives were $0.05 million in the three months
ended February 28, 2010 and $2.9 million in the three months ended February 28, 2009. Primarily all
of the $0.05 million of net expense in the third quarter of fiscal 2010 consists of severance and
outplacement costs. The severance and outplacement costs primarily relate to severance for certain
of our sales and marketing employees as the Company continues to shift our focus increasingly on
the larger enterprise market. Primarily all of the $2.9 million of net expense in the third
quarter of fiscal 2009 resulted from severance and outplacement costs. The severance and
outplacement costs in the third quarter of fiscal 2009 primarily relate to the integration of our
TippingPoint segment. Restructuring charges for the nine months ended February 28, 2010 were $2.7
million, and restructuring charges for the first nine months of fiscal 2009 were $7.4 million.
Restructuring charges of $0.1 million for the three months ended February 28, 2010 related to our
TippingPoint segment, while our Networking segment had a net credit of $0.02 million.
Restructuring charges of $1.7 million and $1.0 million for the nine months ended February 28, 2010
related to our Rest of World sales region in our Networking business and TippingPoint segment,
respectively. Restructuring charges of $0.9 million and $2.0 million for the three months ended
February 28, 2009 related to our Networking business and TippingPoint segment, respectively.
Restructuring charges of $5.4 million and $2.0 million for the nine months ended February 28, 2009
related to our Networking business and our TippingPoint segment, respectively.
Accrued liabilities associated with restructuring charges total $0.1 million as of February 28,
2010 and are included in the caption Accrued liabilities and other in the accompanying
consolidated balance sheets. These liabilities are classified as current because we expect to
satisfy such liabilities in cash within the next 12 months.
Fiscal 2010 Actions
Activity and liability balances related to the fiscal 2010 restructuring actions, are as follows
(in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employee |
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Separation |
|
|
Restructuring |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expense |
|
|
Costs |
|
|
Total |
|
Balance as of May 31, 2009 |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provisions |
|
|
2,528 |
|
|
|
150 |
|
|
|
2,678 |
|
Payments and non-cash charges |
|
|
(2,416 |
) |
|
|
(150 |
) |
|
|
(2,566 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of February 28, 2010 |
|
$ |
112 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
112 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
Employee separation expenses include severance pay, outplacement services, medical and other
related benefits. The reduction in workforce affected employees involved in research and
development, sales and marketing, customer support, and general and administrative functions.
Non-cash charges include stock-based compensation charges as applicable.
We expect to complete any remaining activities related to actions initiated in fiscal 2010 during
fiscal 2010.
Fiscal 2007 through 2009 Actions
Activity and liability balances related to the fiscal 2007 through 2009 restructuring actions are
as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employee |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Separation |
|
|
Facilities-related |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expense |
|
|
Charges |
|
|
Total |
|
Balance as of May 31, 2009 |
|
$ |
1,477 |
|
|
$ |
47 |
|
|
$ |
1,524 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provisions |
|
|
52 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
54 |
|
Payments and non-cash charges |
|
|
(1,529 |
) |
|
|
(12 |
) |
|
|
(1,541 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of February 28, 2010 |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
37 |
|
|
$ |
37 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employee separation expense includes severance pay, outplacement services, medical and other
related benefits. Facilities-related charges related to revised future lease obligations.
We expect to complete any remaining activities related to actions initiated through fiscal 2009
during fiscal 2010.
NOTE 6. INCOME TAXES
The Company provides for income taxes during interim periods based on our estimate of the effective
tax rate for the year. Discrete items and changes in our estimate of the annual effective tax rate
are recorded in the period in which they occur. The Company recognizes interest and penalties
related to uncertain tax positions in income tax expense.
During the three and nine months ended February 28, 2010, the balance of unrecognized tax benefits
decreased by $1.0 million and increased by $1.6 million, respectively. As of February 28, 2010, we
had unrecognized tax benefits, including interest and penalties, of $23.5 million, all of which, if
recognized, would impact our effective tax rate. As of February 28, 2010, the accrued interest and
penalties related to uncertain tax positions were $3.6 million and $0, respectively, which has been
recorded within the balance of unrecognized tax benefits.
As of February 28, 2010 we estimate that the balance of unrecognized tax benefits will decrease by
approximately $5.4 million over the next twelve months as a result of the expiration of various
statutes of limitations on the assessment of income tax.
Under special agreement with the tax authorities certain of our annual Chinese income tax filings
for the calendar year ended December 31, 2008 were not filed until August 14, 2009, pending the
resolution of an uncertainty over the applicable 2008 income tax rate in China. Calendar year 2008
was the final year during which our main operating company in China, Hangzhou H3C Technologies Co.
Ltd (HH3C), was entitled to certain tax concessions under a tax holiday agreement. The Company
provided for income taxes in China for calendar 2008 at 15 percent. In July 2009, the Tax Bureau
of Hangzhou Binjiang District notified the Company that it could enjoy the reduced rate of 9
percent for the 2008 calendar year. The impact of this discrete income tax item was a benefit of
$10.8 million which has been reflected in our fiscal second quarter results as a reduction to
income tax provision.
On December 31, 2009, HH3C was granted Key Software Development Enterprise (KSDE) status by
the Hangzhou Tax Bureau. Status as a KSDE allows the Company to enjoy a 10 percent income tax rate
retroactively applied for all of calendar year 2009. The impact of this discrete income tax item is a
benefit of $9.9 million for the three months ended February 28, 2010. Status as a KSDE needs to be applied for and granted annually. There can
be no assurance that the KSDE status will be granted in future years. Accordingly, the tax rate for
calculating HH3Cs deferred tax assets and liabilities as of December 31, 2009 remains at the 15
percent income tax rate applicable to New and High Technology companies.
11
Income tax payments, net of refunds, were $41.0 million and $9.9 million for the nine months
ended February 28, 2010 and 2009, respectively.
NOTE 7. COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
The components of comprehensive income (loss), net of tax, are as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
February 28, |
|
|
February 28, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Net income |
|
$ |
41,391 |
|
|
$ |
1,867 |
|
|
$ |
68,844 |
|
|
$ |
94,574 |
|
Other comprehensive income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in accumulated
translation adjustments |
|
|
(1,212 |
) |
|
|
(2,307 |
) |
|
|
1,596 |
|
|
|
2,194 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income (loss) |
|
$ |
40,179 |
|
|
$ |
(440 |
) |
|
$ |
70,440 |
|
|
$ |
96,768 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOTE 8. NET INCOME PER SHARE
The following represents a reconciliation from basic earnings per common share to diluted earnings
per common share. Stock options and restricted stock (awards and units) of 12.9 million and 3.8
million, respectively, were outstanding at February 28, 2010 but were not included in the
computation of diluted earnings per share because they were antidilutive. Stock options and
restricted stock (awards and units) of 29.0 million and 8.2 million, respectively, were outstanding
at February 28, 2009, but were not included in the computation of diluted earnings per share
because they were antidilutive.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
February 28, |
|
|
February 28, |
|
(in thousands except per share data) |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Determination of shares: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding |
|
|
396,253 |
|
|
|
384,679 |
|
|
|
392,905 |
|
|
|
393,868 |
|
Assumed conversion of dilutive stock options |
|
|
8,460 |
|
|
|
789 |
|
|
|
5,694 |
|
|
|
873 |
|
Assumed conversion of restricted stock (awards and units) |
|
|
6,833 |
|
|
|
909 |
|
|
|
5,172 |
|
|
|
491 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted weighted average shares outstanding |
|
|
411,546 |
|
|
|
386,377 |
|
|
|
403,771 |
|
|
|
395,232 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings per share |
|
$ |
0.10 |
|
|
$ |
0.00 |
|
|
$ |
0.17 |
|
|
$ |
0.24 |
|
Diluted earnings per share |
|
$ |
0.10 |
|
|
$ |
0.00 |
|
|
$ |
0.17 |
|
|
$ |
0.24 |
|
We have consistently applied the two class earnings per share methodology in all periods reported. Earnings per share has been the same under both
methods except the nine months ended February 28, 2010. In the nine months ended February 28, 2010
the two class method changes the basic earnings per share from $0.18 per share to $0.17 per share.
NOTE 9. INVENTORIES
The components of inventories are as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
February 28, 2010 |
|
|
May 31, 2009 |
|
Finished goods |
|
$ |
93,658 |
|
|
$ |
69,860 |
|
Work-in-process |
|
|
4,287 |
|
|
|
3,420 |
|
Raw materials |
|
|
17,027 |
|
|
|
17,115 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
114,972 |
|
|
$ |
90,395 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12
NOTE 10. INTANGIBLE ASSETS, NET
Intangible assets consist of (in thousands, except for weighted average remaining life):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
February 28, 2010 |
|
May 31, 2009 |
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remaining |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remaining |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization |
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization |
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
Period |
|
Gross |
|
Amortization |
|
Net |
|
Period |
|
Gross |
|
Amortization |
|
Net |
Existing technology |
|
|
2.8 |
|
|
$ |
398,454 |
|
|
$ |
(312,636 |
) |
|
$ |
85,818 |
|
|
|
3.6 |
|
|
$ |
398,178 |
|
|
$ |
(272,460 |
) |
|
$ |
125,718 |
|
Trademark |
|
NA |
|
|
55,502 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
55,502 |
|
|
NA |
|
|
55,502 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
55,502 |
|
OEM agreement |
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
26,883 |
|
|
|
(24,668 |
) |
|
|
2,215 |
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
23,777 |
|
|
|
(14,852 |
) |
|
|
8,925 |
|
Maintenance agreements |
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
19,000 |
|
|
|
(16,100 |
) |
|
|
2,900 |
|
|
|
1.7 |
|
|
|
19,000 |
|
|
|
(13,724 |
) |
|
|
5,276 |
|
Other |
|
|
1.3 |
|
|
|
22,706 |
|
|
|
(20,709 |
) |
|
|
1,997 |
|
|
|
2.0 |
|
|
|
22,697 |
|
|
|
(19,494 |
) |
|
|
3,203 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
522,545 |
|
|
$ |
(374,113 |
) |
|
$ |
148,432 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
519,154 |
|
|
$ |
(320,530 |
) |
|
$ |
198,624 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During the nine months ended February 28, 2010 our gross intangible assets increased by $3.4
million due to the appreciation on the Renminbi affecting the value of certain intangible assets
related to our H3C subsidiary. Net intangible assets at February 28, 2010 in our China-based sales
region were $139.5 million and in our TippingPoint segment were $8.9 million.
Annual amortization expense related to intangible assets is expected to be as follows for each of
the following five succeeding fiscal years (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remainder |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
of 2010 |
|
2011 |
|
2012 |
|
2013 |
|
2014 |
|
2015 |
Amortization expense |
|
$ |
16,451 |
|
|
$ |
42,242 |
|
|
$ |
17,144 |
|
|
$ |
17,093 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We apply the provisions of ASC 350 Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets to goodwill and
intangible assets with indefinite lives (our trademark) which are not amortized but are reviewed annually for
impairment or more frequently if impairment indicators arise. We performed our annual goodwill
impairment review as of February 26, 2010 for our TippingPoint segment and December 31, 2009 for
our China-based region (as our China-based region reports on a two month lag), and noted no
impairment of goodwill or intangible assets with indefinite lives. In making this assessment, we
rely on a number of factors including operating results, business plans, economic projections,
anticipated future cash flows, and transactions and marketplace data. There are inherent
uncertainties related to these factors and our judgment in applying them to the analysis of
goodwill impairment. Reporting unit valuations have been calculated using a combination of an
income approach based on the present value of future cash flows of each reporting unit and a market
approach. The income approach incorporates many assumptions including future growth rates, discount
factors, expected capital expenditures and income tax cash flows. Changes in economic and operating
conditions impacting these assumptions could result in a goodwill impairment in future periods. In
conjunction with our annual goodwill impairment tests, we reconcile the sum of the valuations of
all of our reporting units to our market capitalization as of such dates.
Goodwill as of February 28, 2010 and May 31, 2009 was $609.3 million. Goodwill in our Networking
business was $455.9 million for both periods and goodwill in our TippingPoint segment was $153.4
million (net of accumulated impairments of $158.0 million) for both periods.
NOTE 11. ACCRUED WARRANTY
Most products are sold with varying lengths of limited warranty ranging from 90 days to limited
lifetime. Allowances for estimated warranty obligations are recorded as part of cost of sales in
the period of sale, and are based on historical experience related to product failure rates and
actual warranty costs incurred during the applicable warranty period. Also, on an ongoing basis, we
assess the adequacy of our allowances related to warranty obligations recorded in previous periods
and may adjust the balances to reflect actual experience or changes in future expectations.
13
The following table summarizes the activity in the allowance for estimated warranty costs for the
nine months ended February 28, 2010 and 2009 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
February 28, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Accrued warranty, beginning of period |
|
$ |
29,587 |
|
|
$ |
36,897 |
|
Cost of warranty claims processed during the period |
|
|
(18,596 |
) |
|
|
(23,613 |
) |
Provision for warranties related to products sold during the period |
|
|
14,994 |
|
|
|
19,308 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued warranty, end of period |
|
$ |
25,985 |
|
|
$ |
32,592 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOTE 12. LONG-TERM DEBT AND OTHER BANK OBLIGATIONS
Senior Secured Credit Agreement H3C Holdings Limited
On May 25, 2007, our subsidiary H3C Holdings Limited (Borrower) entered into an amended and
restated credit agreement with various lenders, including Goldman Sachs Credit Partners L.P., as
Mandated Lead Arranger, Bookrunner, Administrative Agent and Syndication Agent, and Industrial and
Commercial Bank of China (Asia) Limited, as Collateral Agent (the Credit Agreement). Under the
Credit Agreement, the Borrower borrowed $430 million in the form of a senior secured term loan in
two tranches (Tranche A and Tranche B) to finance a portion of the purchase price for 3Coms
acquisition of 49 percent of H3C Technologies Co., Limited, or H3C (a Hong Kong entity). The
Borrower and its subsidiaries are referred to collectively as the H3C Group.
Interest on borrowings is payable semi-annually on March 28 and September 28, and commenced on
September 28, 2007. All amounts outstanding under the Tranche A Term Facility will bear interest,
at the Borrowers option, at the (i) LIBOR, or (ii) Base Rate (i.e., prime rate), in each case plus
the applicable margin percentage set forth in the table below, which is based on a leverage ratio
of consolidated indebtedness of the Borrower and its subsidiaries to EBITDA (as defined in the
Credit Agreement) for the relevant twelve-month period:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Leverage Ratio |
|
LIBOR + |
|
Base Rate + |
>3.0:1.0
|
|
|
2.25 |
% |
|
|
1.25 |
% |
£3.0:1.0 but > 2.0:1.0
|
|
|
2.00 |
% |
|
|
1.00 |
% |
£2.0:1.0 but > 1.0:1.0
|
|
|
1.75 |
% |
|
|
0.75 |
% |
£1.0:1.0
|
|
|
1.50 |
% |
|
|
0.50 |
% |
All amounts outstanding under the Tranche B Term Facility will bear interest, at the Borrowers
option, at the (i) LIBOR plus 3 percent or (ii) Base Rate (i.e., prime rate) plus 2 percent. We
have elected to use LIBOR as the reference rate for borrowings to date. Applicable LIBOR rates,
which were established on September 28, 2009, at February 28, 2010 were 0.64 percent and the
effective interest rate at February 28, 2010 was 2.14 percent for the Tranche A Term Facility and
3.64 percent for the Tranche B Term Facility. On March 29, 2010 the LIBOR rates reset to 0.44
percent and the effective interest rate will be 1.94 percent for the Tranche A Term Facility and
3.44 percent for the Tranche B Term Facility and will remain the rates until September 28, 2010.
Required payments under the loan are generally expected to be serviced by cash flows from the H3C
Group.
Borrowings under the Credit Agreement may be prepaid in whole or in part without premium or penalty
if paid at the time of making a semi-annual interest payment. The Borrower will be required to make
mandatory prepayments using net proceeds from H3C Group (i) asset sales, (ii) insurance proceeds
and (iii) equity offerings or debt incurrence. In addition, to the extent there exists excess cash
flow as defined under the Credit Agreement, the Borrower will be required to make annual
prepayments. Any excess cash flow amounts not required to prepay the loan may be distributed to and
used by the Company outside of the H3C Group, provided certain conditions are met.
H3C and all other existing and future subsidiaries of the Borrower (other than PRC subsidiaries or
small excluded subsidiaries) will guarantee all obligations under the loans and are referred to
as Guarantors. The loan obligations are secured by (1) first priority security interests in all
assets of the Borrower and the Guarantors, including their bank accounts, and (2) a first priority
security interest in 100 percent of the capital stock of the Borrower and H3C and the PRC
subsidiaries of H3C. The debt bears interest at floating rates therefore the carrying value
approximates fair value.
14
The Borrower must maintain a minimum debt service coverage, minimum interest coverage, maximum
capital expenditures and a maximum total leverage ratio. Negative covenants restrict, among other
things, (i) the incurrence of indebtedness by the Borrower and its subsidiaries, (ii) the making of
dividends and distributions to the Company outside of the H3C Group, (iii) the ability to make
investments including in new subsidiaries, (iv) the ability to undertake mergers and acquisitions
and (v) sales of assets. As of February 28, 2010, the H3C Groups net assets were $877.3 million
and are subject to these dividend restrictions. Also, cash dividends from the PRC subsidiaries to
H3C, and H3C to the Borrower, will be subject to restricted use pending payment of principal,
interest and excess cash flow prepayments. Standard events of default apply.
Remaining payments of the $112 million principal are due on September 28, of each year as follows,
(in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Calendar Year |
|
3Com Fiscal Year |
|
Tranche A |
|
Tranche B |
2010 |
|
2011 |
|
|
46,000 |
|
|
|
2,000 |
|
2011 |
|
2012 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,000 |
|
2012 |
|
2013 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
44,000 |
|
On September 28, 2009, in addition to our regular principal payment of $48.0 million, the Company
made a voluntary prepayment of $40.0 million of principal, for which the Company did not incur a
penalty and all of which was applied to reduce our fiscal year 2013 Tranche B principal balance. We
recorded accelerated amortization of deferred financing fees $0.9 million in our second fiscal
quarter related to the voluntary prepayment. The Company also made interest payments of $4.1
million on September 28, 2009 and $1.7 million on March 29, 2010.
In the three and nine months ended February 28, 2010 we recorded interest expense of $1.6 million
and $8.0 million, respectively, compared to $6.6 million and $15.3 million in the same period of
the prior fiscal year. In the three and nine months ended February 28, 2010 we recorded interest
income of $2.2 million and $5.7 million, respectively, compared to $3.2 million and $10.2 million
in the same period of the prior fiscal year.
Other Bank Obligations
As of February 28, 2010, bank-issued standby letters of credit and guarantees totaled $7.0 million,
including $6.0 million relating to potential foreign tax, custom, and duty assessments. These
instruments are entered into in support of our commercial operations. We provide the bank with cash
collateral for 100 percent of these amounts. Restricted cash held as collateral was $7.0 million
and is included in deposits and other assets on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet.
NOTE 13. SEGMENT INFORMATION
In the first quarter of fiscal 2010, we changed the measures of segment contribution profit (loss)
and segment income to align with how we currently manage our business and report internally.
Accordingly, our previously reported segment information has been revised to reflect our new
measure of segment contribution profit (loss) and segment income. Based on the information provided
to our chief operating decision-maker (CODM) for purposes of making decisions about allocating
resources and assessing performance, we have two primary businesses, our Networking Business and
TippingPoint Security Business. Our Networking Business consists of the following sales regions as
operating segments: China-based (including Japan and Hong Kong SAR), Asia Pacific Region excluding
China-based sales region (APR), Europe Middle East and Africa (EMEA), Latin America (LAT),
and North America (NA) regions. The APR, EMEA, LAT and NA operating segments have been aggregated
given their similar economic characteristics, products, customers and processes, and have been
consolidated as one reportable segment called, Rest of World. The China-based sales region does
not meet the aggregation criteria at this time.
The China-based and Rest of World reporting segments benefit from shared support services on a
world-wide basis. The costs associated with providing these shared central functions are not
allocated to the China-based and Rest of World reporting segments and instead are reported and
disclosed under the caption Central Functions. Central Function costs include research and
development expenses and other operating expenses. Other operating expenses in both our Central
Function costs and TippingPoint Security business include other costs of sales, such as supply
chain operations, indirect sales and marketing, and general and administrative support costs.
Management evaluates the China-based sales region and the Rest of World sales region performance
based on segment contribution profit. Segment contribution profit is standard margin less segment
direct sales and marketing expenses. Standard margin for these regions is sales less standard costs
of sales. Our TippingPoint Security business segment is measured on segment income. Segment income
is segment contribution profit less research and development expenses.
15
Eliminations and other include intercompany sales eliminations, stock-based compensation expense,
amortization of intangible assets and restructuring in all periods as well as proceeds from the
Realtek patent dispute resolution in the first quarter of fiscal 2009, as these costs are not
included in the Companys segment contribution profit and segment income.
Summarized financial information of our results of operations by segment for the three and nine
months ended February 28, 2010 and 2009 is as follows.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended February 28, 2010 |
|
|
|
Networking Business |
|
|
TippingPoint |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rest of |
|
|
|
|
|
Security |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
World |
|
|
|
|
|
Business |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
China-based |
|
|
Sales |
|
|
Central |
|
|
Tipping |
|
|
Eliminations/ |
|
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
sales region |
|
|
Region |
|
|
Functions(a) |
|
|
Point(b) |
|
|
Other |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales |
|
$ |
187,963 |
|
|
$ |
123,401 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
37,868 |
|
|
$ |
(3,352 |
)c |
|
$ |
345,880 |
|
Standard margin |
|
|
133,300 |
|
|
|
79,033 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32,076 |
|
|
|
(557 |
)d |
|
|
243,852 |
|
Direct sales & marketing expenses |
|
|
43,109 |
|
|
|
26,354 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,543 |
|
|
|
2,147 |
d |
|
|
85,153 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment contribution profit (loss) |
|
|
90,191 |
|
|
|
52,679 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,533 |
|
|
|
(2,704 |
) |
|
|
158,699 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research & development expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40,409 |
|
|
|
7,050 |
|
|
|
538 |
d |
|
|
47,997 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment income |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
11,483 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other operating expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
61,567 |
|
|
|
4,183 |
|
|
|
22,574 |
e |
|
|
88,324 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
22,378 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended February 28, 2009 |
|
|
|
Networking Business |
|
|
TippingPoint |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rest of |
|
|
|
|
|
Security |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
World |
|
|
|
|
|
Business |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
China-based |
|
|
Sales |
|
|
Central |
|
|
Tipping |
|
|
Eliminations/ |
|
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
sales region |
|
|
Region |
|
|
Functions(a) |
|
|
Point(b) |
|
|
Other |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales |
|
$ |
190,385 |
|
|
$ |
102,836 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
33,284 |
|
|
$ |
(1,798 |
)c |
|
$ |
324,707 |
|
Standard margin |
|
|
128,160 |
|
|
|
61,365 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28,288 |
|
|
|
(596 |
)d |
|
|
217,217 |
|
Direct sales & marketing expenses |
|
|
36,581 |
|
|
|
23,360 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,882 |
|
|
|
1,371 |
d |
|
|
72,194 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment contribution profit (loss) |
|
|
91,579 |
|
|
|
38,005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,406 |
|
|
|
(1,967 |
) |
|
|
145,023 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research & development expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37,574 |
|
|
|
7,103 |
|
|
|
552 |
d |
|
|
45,229 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment income |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
10,303 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other operating expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
56,146 |
|
|
|
9,488 |
|
|
|
32,660 |
e |
|
|
98,294 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended February 28, 2010 |
|
|
|
Networking Business |
|
|
TippingPoint |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rest of |
|
|
|
|
|
Security |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
World |
|
|
|
|
|
Business |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
China-based |
|
|
Sales |
|
|
Central |
|
|
Tipping |
|
|
Eliminations/ |
|
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
sales region |
|
|
Region |
|
|
Functions(a) |
|
|
Point(b) |
|
|
Other |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales |
|
$ |
509,273 |
|
|
$ |
349,862 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
106,334 |
|
|
$ |
(6,923 |
)c |
|
$ |
958,546 |
|
Standard margin |
|
|
353,397 |
|
|
|
215,553 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
89,960 |
|
|
|
(1,688 |
)d |
|
|
657,222 |
|
Direct sales & marketing expenses |
|
|
117,520 |
|
|
|
75,663 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37,325 |
|
|
|
5,818 |
d |
|
|
236,326 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment contribution profit (loss) |
|
|
235,877 |
|
|
|
139,890 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
52,635 |
|
|
|
(7,506 |
) |
|
|
420,896 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research & development expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
107,429 |
|
|
|
19,499 |
|
|
|
1,437 |
d |
|
|
128,365 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment income |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
33,136 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other operating expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
170,062 |
|
|
|
13,421 |
|
|
|
69,054 |
e |
|
|
252,537 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
39,994 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended February 28, 2009 |
|
|
|
Networking Business |
|
|
TippingPoint |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rest of |
|
|
|
|
|
Security |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
World |
|
|
|
|
|
Business |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
China-based |
|
|
Sales |
|
|
Central |
|
|
Tipping |
|
|
Eliminations/ |
|
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
sales region |
|
|
Region |
|
|
Functions(a) |
|
|
Point(b) |
|
|
Other |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales |
|
$ |
565,597 |
|
|
$ |
368,838 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
92,499 |
|
|
$ |
(5,015 |
)c |
|
$ |
1,021,919 |
|
Standard margin |
|
|
375,588 |
|
|
|
215,479 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
76,962 |
|
|
|
(1,916 |
)d |
|
|
666,113 |
|
Direct sales & marketing expenses |
|
|
106,194 |
|
|
|
77,254 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32,873 |
|
|
|
4,742 |
d |
|
|
221,063 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment contribution profit (loss) |
|
|
269,394 |
|
|
|
138,225 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
44,089 |
|
|
|
(6,658 |
) |
|
|
445,050 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research & development expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
118,603 |
|
|
|
20,698 |
|
|
|
2,329 |
d |
|
|
141,630 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment income |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
23,391 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other operating expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
177,697 |
|
|
|
22,641 |
|
|
|
23,797 |
e |
|
|
224,135 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
79,285 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
a |
|
Included in our Central Function results were depreciation expenses of $4.4 million
and $8.1 million
for the three months ended February 28, 2010 and 2009, respectively, and $14.2 million and
$21.1 million
for the nine months ended February 28, 2010 and 2009, respectively. |
|
b |
|
Included in our TippingPoint segment profit were depreciation expenses of $0.8 million
and $0.8 million
for the three months ended February 28, 2010 and 2009, respectively, and $2.8 million and $2.8
million
for the nine months ended February 28, 2010 and 2009, respectively. |
|
c |
|
Represents eliminations for inter-company revenue between Networking and TippingPoint
during the respective
periods. |
|
d |
|
Represents stock-based compensation in all periods. |
|
e |
|
Includes stock-based compensation, amortization, and restructuring in all periods plus
acquisition related costs,
proceeds from the Realtek patent dispute resolution, property and equipment impairment and
legal settlement
accruals where applicable. |
17
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Identifiable assets (in thousands) |
|
February 28, 2010 |
|
|
May 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
China-based sales region(1)(2) |
|
$ |
1,371,856 |
|
|
$ |
1,378,059 |
|
Rest of World sales region(1) |
|
|
1,029,098 |
|
|
|
875,788 |
|
TippingPoint |
|
|
245,708 |
|
|
|
228,440 |
|
Eliminations(3) |
|
|
(713,714 |
) |
|
|
(666,930 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
1,932,948 |
|
|
$ |
1,815,357 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Included in our identifiable assets for both our China-based sales region and Rest of World sales region are Central Function assets. We
do not segregate these assets as the CODM does not review the segment assets in that manner. |
|
(2) |
|
Our China-based sales region identifiable assets are the same as those held by our H3C subsidiary. |
|
(3) |
|
The eliminations primarily relate to the Rest of World sales region investment in subsidiaries and intercompany transactions. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
February 28, |
|
Total Expenditures for Additions to Property and Equipment (in thousands) |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
China-based sales region(1) |
|
$ |
3,301 |
|
|
$ |
4,934 |
|
Rest of World sales region(1) |
|
|
6,652 |
|
|
|
5,585 |
|
TippingPoint |
|
|
1,217 |
|
|
|
2,259 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
11,170 |
|
|
$ |
12,778 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Included in our capital expenditures for both our China-based
sales region and Rest of World sales region are Central Function
expenditures for additions to property and equipment. We do not
segregate these expenditures as the CODM does not review the
segment in that manner. |
Certain product groups account for a significant portion of our sales. In the first quarter
of fiscal 2010 we expanded the number of individually reported networking equipment products. We
have expanded our networking equipment into two categories: switches and routers, and other
networking equipment. Other networking equipment revenue includes sales of our VCX and NBX®
voice-over-internet protocol, or VoIP, IP storage, IP surveillance and our wireless LAN (WLAN)
products. We have also consolidated voice into other networking equipment. Prior year disclosures
have been revised to be comparable with our current year groupings. Security revenue includes our
TippingPoint products and services, as well as other security products, such as our embedded
firewall, or EFW and virtual private network, or VPN, products. Services revenue includes
professional services and maintenance contracts, excluding TippingPoint maintenance which is
included in security revenue. Sales from these product groups as a percentage of total sales for
the respective periods are as follows (in thousands, except percentages):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended February 28, |
|
|
Nine Months Ended February 28, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Switches and routers |
|
$ |
234,433 |
|
|
|
67.8 |
% |
|
$ |
227,583 |
|
|
|
70.1 |
% |
|
$ |
643,194 |
|
|
|
67.1 |
% |
|
$ |
738,343 |
|
|
|
72.3 |
% |
Other networking equipment |
|
|
48,521 |
|
|
|
14.0 |
% |
|
|
41,679 |
|
|
|
12.8 |
% |
|
|
141,344 |
|
|
|
14.7 |
% |
|
|
126,311 |
|
|
|
12.4 |
% |
Security |
|
|
48,286 |
|
|
|
14.0 |
% |
|
|
43,553 |
|
|
|
13.4 |
% |
|
|
135,387 |
|
|
|
14.1 |
% |
|
|
122,682 |
|
|
|
12.0 |
% |
Services |
|
|
14,640 |
|
|
|
4.2 |
% |
|
|
11,892 |
|
|
|
3.7 |
% |
|
|
38,621 |
|
|
|
4.1 |
% |
|
|
34,583 |
|
|
|
3.3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
345,880 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
$ |
324,707 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
$ |
958,546 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
$ |
1,021,919 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18
NOTE 14. GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION
Sales by geographic region are as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended February 28, |
|
|
Nine Months Ended February 28, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
China |
|
$ |
187,963 |
|
|
$ |
183,758 |
|
|
$ |
503,274 |
|
|
$ |
544,136 |
|
Europe, Middle East, and Africa |
|
|
59,134 |
|
|
|
52,982 |
|
|
|
161,037 |
|
|
|
181,348 |
|
North America |
|
|
45,839 |
|
|
|
43,300 |
|
|
|
151,278 |
|
|
|
144,461 |
|
Asia Pacific (except China) |
|
|
24,049 |
|
|
|
23,850 |
|
|
|
71,738 |
|
|
|
81,147 |
|
Latin and South America |
|
|
28,895 |
|
|
|
20,817 |
|
|
|
71,219 |
|
|
|
70,827 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
345,880 |
|
|
$ |
324,707 |
|
|
$ |
958,546 |
|
|
$ |
1,021,919 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All sales (other than sales to Original Equipment Manufacturer (OEM) partners) are reported in
geographic categories based on the location of the end customer. Sales to OEM partners are included
in the geographic categories based upon the hub locations of the OEM partners.
NOTE 15. LITIGATION
We are a party to lawsuits in the normal course of our business. Litigation can be expensive and
disruptive to normal business operations. Moreover, the results of complex legal proceedings are
difficult to predict and the outcome of claims against the Company described below are uncertain.
We believe that we have meritorious defenses in the matters set forth below in which we are named
as a defendant. An unfavorable resolution of the lawsuit in which we are a defendant as described
below, could adversely affect our business, financial position, results of operations, or cash
flow. The Company does not believe that the ultimate disposition of these matters will have a
material adverse effect on the Companys financial position.
On December 5, 2001, TippingPoint and two of its current and former officers and directors, as well
as the managing underwriters in TippingPoints initial public offering, were named as defendants in
a purported class action lawsuit filed in the United States District Court for the Southern
District of New York. The lawsuit, which is part of a consolidated action that includes over 300
similar actions, is captioned In re Initial Public Offering Securities Litigation, Brian Levey vs.
TippingPoint Technologies, Inc., et al. (Civil Action Number 01-CV-10976). The principal allegation
in the lawsuit is that the defendants participated in a scheme to manipulate the initial public
offering and subsequent market price of TippingPoints stock (and the stock of other public
companies) by knowingly assisting the underwriters requirement that certain of their customers had
to purchase stock in a specific initial public offering as a condition to being allocated shares in
the initial public offerings of other companies. In relation to TippingPoint, the purported
plaintiff class for the lawsuit is comprised of all persons who purchased TippingPoint stock from
March 17, 2000 through December 6, 2000. The suit seeks rescission of the purchase prices paid by
purchasers of shares of TippingPoint common stock. On September 10, 2002, TippingPoints counsel
and counsel for the plaintiffs entered into an agreement pursuant to which the plaintiffs
dismissed, without prejudice, TippingPoints former and current officers and directors from the
lawsuit. In March 2009, TippingPoint signed a settlement agreement with the plaintiffs. On April 2,
2009, all the parties to the lawsuit (including all plaintiffs, issuers, and underwriters) filed
settlement documents with the District Court. On June 10, 2009 the District Court issued its
preliminary approval of the settlement. From June 2009 to September 2009, the plaintiffs sent
notifications to approximately 7 million potential class members, 140 of whom objected and
approximately 350 of whom opted out. The judge conducted the final approval hearing on September
10, 2009, and thereafter, on October 5, 2009, issued an order approving the settlement. Several
objectors have filed an appeal of this Order with the Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.
These appeals are currently pending. The settlement, if approved by the Court of Appeals, will
fully dispose of this lawsuit. Any direct financial impact of the settlement is expected to be
borne by TippingPoints insurers. If the Court of Appeals does not approve the settlement for any
reason and the litigation against TippingPoint continues, we intend to defend this action
vigorously, but cannot make any predictions about the outcome. To the extent necessary, we will
seek indemnification and/or contribution from the underwriters in TippingPoints initial public
offering pursuant to its underwriting agreement with the underwriters. However, there can be no
assurance that indemnification or contribution will be available to TippingPoint or enforceable
against the underwriters.
On July 31, 2008, the Company filed a lawsuit in the Delaware Chancery Court against Diamond II
Holdings, Inc., an entity controlled by affiliates of Bain Capital Partners, LLC. The lawsuit seeks
interpretation and enforcement of the provisions of the Merger Agreement and Plan of Merger by
among 3Com, Diamond II Holdings, Inc., and Diamond II Acquisition Corp., dated as of September 28,
2007. The litigation is in furtherance of our efforts to enforce the provisions of the
now-terminated Merger Agreement related to the termination fee. There can be no assurance that
3Com will be able to collect this fee.
19
Between November 12, 2009 and November 24, 2009, eight purported class action complaints were filed
in the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware against 3Com and all of the current members of
3Coms board of directors. Seven of the complaints name Hewlett-Packard Company (HP) as a
defendant. Four of the complaints also name Merger Sub as a defendant. The plaintiffs, David Shaev,
Leonard Ahern, Richard Hall, Larry McIntyre, Alan Kahn, Ashok Madan, County of York Employees
Retirement Plan, and Pipefitters Local No. 636 Defined Benefit Plan, all claim that they were
stockholders of 3Com and that they filed their lawsuits on behalf of themselves and a class
consisting of all public stockholders of 3Com. Among other things, the complaints, captioned Shaev
v. 3Com Corporation, et al., Civil Action No. 5067, Ahern v. Cote, et al., Civil Action No. 5068,
Hall v. 3Com Corporation, et al., Civil Action No. 5073, McIntyre v. 3Com Corporation, et al.,
Civil Action No. 5080, Kahn v. 3Com Corporation, et al., Civil Action No. 5087, Madan v. 3Com
Corporation, et al., Civil Action No. 5092, County of York Employees Retirement Plan v. 3Com
Corporation, et al., Civil Action No. 5098, and Pipefitters Local No. 636 Defined Benefit Plan v.
Cote, et al., Civil Action No. 5103, generally allege that the members of 3Coms board of directors
breached their fiduciary duties by failing to maximize shareholder value in negotiating and
approving the Merger. Seven of the complaints also generally allege that HP and, in four of the
complaints, Merger Sub, aided and abetted these alleged breaches of fiduciary duties. The
complaints seek class certification, certain forms of injunctive relief, including enjoining the
consummation of the Merger and rescission of the Merger Agreement, as well as unspecified damages.
On December 2, 2009, the Chancery Court consolidated the actions for all purposes under the caption
In re 3Com Shareholders Litigation, Case No. C.A. No. 5067-CC. On December 11, 2009, the
plaintiffs filed their Consolidated Amended Complaint. The Consolidated Amended Complaint includes
the allegations, defendants, and requested relief described above, but does not name 3Com as a
defendant and adds allegations that the preliminary proxy statement failed to provide information
necessary for 3Coms shareholders to vote on the Merger, including details of the financial
analysis conducted by 3Coms financial advisor, Goldman Sachs, and the Management Plan. On
December 11, 2009, the plaintiffs moved for a preliminary injunction and for expedited proceedings.
On December 15, 2009, 3Com and the members of its board filed an opposition to plaintiffs motion
for expedited proceedings. On December 18, 2009, the Chancery Court issued an order denying
plaintiffs motion for expedited proceedings on the ground that, among other things, plaintiffs had
failed to state a colorable claim for relief. On December 28, 2009, 3Com and the members of the
board moved to dismiss the Consolidated Amended Complaint for, among other things, failure to state
a claim upon which relief may be granted. On January 6, 2010, the Chancery Court denied
plaintiffs request for a hearing on their motion for a preliminary injunction. On March 22, 2010,
the Chancery Court so ordered the parties stipulation to dismiss the consolidated action without
prejudice.
On November 12, 2009 and November 25, 2009, two separate purported class action complaints were
filed in the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts, by, respectively,
plaintiffs Edward Tansey and Robert Levine, et al., against 3Com and all of the current members of
3Coms board of directors. Like the plaintiffs in the Delaware actions, the plaintiffs in these
actions have asserted that they were stockholders of 3Com and filed the lawsuit purportedly on
behalf of themselves and a class consisting of all other stockholders of 3Com. Among other things,
the complaints, captioned Tansey v. 3Com Corporation, et al., Case No. 09-cv-11941, and Levine and
Duncan v. 3Com Corporation, et al., Case No. 09-cv-12027, generally allege that the members of
3Coms board of directors breached their fiduciary duties by failing to maximize shareholder value
in negotiating and approving the Merger, and that 3Com aided and abetted these alleged breaches of
fiduciary duties. The complaints seek class certification and certain forms of injunctive relief,
including enjoining the consummation of the Merger and rescission of the acquisition. On December
7, 2009, pursuant to the parties stipulation, the Court adjourned sine die defendants deadline
for responding to the Tansey complaint and administratively closed that action until a response is
filed. On December 15, 2009, pursuant to the parties stipulation, the Court adjourned sine die
defendants deadline for responding to the Levine and Duncan complaint and, on December 16, 2009,
administratively closed that action until a response is filed.
On November 16, 2009, two other purported class action complaints were filed in the Superior Court
for the Commonwealth of Massachusetts against 3Com, all of the current members of 3Coms board of
directors, HP, and Merger Sub. Like the plaintiffs in the Delaware actions and the federal actions
in Massachusetts, the plaintiffs in these actions, Dean Davenport and Stanley Tanzer, both claim
that they were stockholders of 3Com and that they filed their lawsuits on behalf of themselves and
a class consisting of all public stockholders of 3Com. Among other things, the complaints,
captioned Davenport v. Benhamou, et al., Case No. 09-4886, and Tanzer v. Benhamou, et al., Case No.
09-4887, generally allege that the members of 3Coms board of directors breached their fiduciary
duties by failing to maximize shareholder value in negotiating and approving the Merger, and that
3Com, HP and Merger Sub aided and abetted these alleged breaches of fiduciary duties. On November
25, 2009, 3Com and its board served a motion to dismiss or stay the action on plaintiffs in both
the Davenport and Tanzer cases. On December 1, 2009, the plaintiffs in both Davenport and Tanzer
moved for expedited proceedings. 3Com and its board filed oppositions to those motions on December
3, 2009. On December 7, 2009, the plaintiffs in both actions moved for consolidation. On December
17, 2009, 3Com and its board filed an opposition to that motion. On or about December 24, 2009,
the Court denied plaintiffs motions for expedited proceedings in both the Davenport and Tanzer
cases. On January 4, 2010, 3Com and its board moved for a protective order to stay discovery in
both actions until the Court rules
20
on the pending motions to dismiss or stay. On January 12, 2010, in return for withdrawal of the
motion for a protective order, plaintiffs agreed to stay discovery pending decision on the motions
to dismiss or stay.
On January 7, 2010, Parallel Technology, LLC sued 3Com in the Court of Chancery of the State of
Delaware. The complaint, filed under seal, alleges that 3Com had breached, and (upon the Mergers
closing) would breach, the confidentiality and cooperation provisions of a patent sale agreement
between Parallel and 3Com. Parallel claims breach of contract and breach of the duty of good faith
and fair dealing. On January 18, 2010, Parallel moved for a temporary restraining order, expedited
proceedings, and a preliminary injunction against 3Coms consummation of the then-proposed Merger
with HP. On January 19, 2010, 3Com filed an opposition to Parallels motion for a temporary
restraining order and expedited proceedings. That same day, the Chancery Court denied Parallels
motion for a temporary restraining order and expedited proceedings, and declined to schedule a
hearing on the preliminary injunction motion. On January 22, 2010, 3Com moved to dismiss the
complaint. On January 26, 2010, Parallel moved to certify interlocutory appeal from the Chancery
Courts January 19 order. 3Com filed an opposition to the certification motion on February 4,
2010. On February 12, 2010, the Chancery Court issued an order denying the certification motion.
On February 16, 2010, Parallel petitioned the Supreme Court of the State of Delaware for
interlocutory appeal of the Chancery Courts January 19 order. The Supreme Court of the State of
Delaware issued an order denying the petition on February 18, 2010. On March 9, 2010, Parallel
filed its first amended complaint. On March 12, 2010, 3Com moved to dismiss the first amended
complaint and to stay discovery.
NOTE 16. PROPOSED ACQUISITION OF THE COMPANY
On November 11, 2009, 3Com Corporation, a Delaware corporation (3Com), entered into an Agreement
and Plan of Merger (the Merger Agreement) by and among 3Com, Hewlett-Packard Company, a Delaware
corporation (HP), and Colorado Acquisition Corporation, a Delaware corporation and a wholly owned
subsidiary of HP (Merger Sub). Upon the terms of the Merger Agreement and subject to the terms
set forth therein, Merger Sub will be merged with and into 3Com, and as a result 3Com will continue
as the surviving corporation and a wholly owned subsidiary of HP (the Merger).
Pursuant to the Merger Agreement, at the closing of the Merger, each issued and outstanding share
of common stock of 3Com, other than shares owned by 3Com, HP or Merger Sub, or by any stockholders
who are entitled to and who properly exercise appraisal rights under Delaware law, will be
cancelled and will be automatically converted into the right to receive $7.90 in cash, without
interest.
Vesting of all outstanding 3Com equity based awards under 3Com equity plans will continue until the
closing of the Merger in accordance with their respective terms. At the closing of the Merger,
outstanding stock options issued under 3Com equity plans that are (i) not yet vested or
exercisable, and/or (ii) have an exercise price greater than or equal to $7.90 per share will be
assumed by HP and automatically converted into an option with respect to shares of HP common stock
based on an exchange ratio described in the Merger Agreement. In addition, outstanding stock
options issued under 3Com equity plans that are vested and have an exercise price less than $7.90
per share, will be cancelled and cashed out at the difference between $7.90 and the exercise price
per share less applicable tax withholdings. Additionally, all restricted stock units and shares of
restricted stock issued under 3Com equity plans that are outstanding immediately prior to the
closing of the Merger will be assumed by HP and automatically converted into awards based upon HP
common stock as described in the Merger Agreement.
On November 11, 2009, 3Com and the American Stock Transfer & Trust Company, a New York state trust
company (the Rights Agent) entered into Amendment No. 2 (the Amendment) to the Third Amended
and Restated Preferred Shares Rights Agreement between 3Com and the Rights Agent as amended and
restated as of November 4, 2002, as amended to date (the Rights Agreement). The Amendment permits
the execution of the Merger Agreement and the performance and consummation of the transactions
contemplated by the Merger Agreement, including the Merger, without triggering the provisions of
the Rights Agreement.
The Merger Agreement contains a non-solicitation or no shop provision restricting 3Com from
soliciting alternative acquisition proposals from third parties and from furnishing non-public
information to and engaging in discussions with third parties regarding alternative acquisition
proposals. The no-shop provision was subject to a customary fiduciary-out provision, which would
have allowed 3Com under certain circumstances prior to the approval of the Merger Agreement by our
stockholders to furnish non-public information to and participate in discussions with third parties
with respect to a bona fide unsolicited written alternative acquisition proposal that constituted
or was reasonably likely to lead to a superior proposal and under certain circumstances, coupled
with the payment of a termination fee of $99,000,000, to terminate the Merger Agreement.
21
We believe that our future cash requirements will likely include an aggregate of $2 million to $5
million for professional and other fees related to our proposed acquisition by HP that are not
contingent on the closing of the deal. Pursuant to an engagement letter between Goldman Sachs and
us, we agreed to pay Goldman Sachs a transaction fee of approximately $41 million, approximately
$38 million of which is payable upon consummation of the Merger.
The closing of the Merger is subject to the satisfaction or waiver of specified closing conditions,
including, without limitation, (i) the adoption of the Merger Agreement by 3Coms stockholders and
(ii) the expiration or termination of waiting periods, and obtaining of requisite approvals or
clearances, under specified antitrust and competition laws (including, without limitation, in
China, the European Union and the United States, among others). On December 22, 2009, the relevant
U.S. antitrust authorities granted early termination of the waiting period under the U.S.
Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976, as amended. On February 12, 2010, the
European Commission cleared the Merger under the EU Merger Regulation. In addition, on January 26,
2010, 3Coms stockholders adopted the Merger Agreement at a special meeting of stockholders.
Several purported class action lawsuits have been filed against 3Com and all of the current members
of 3Coms board of directors in connection with the proposed Merger. See Note 15 Litigation for
a further discussion of these actions.
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
INTRODUCTION
The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the condensed consolidated financial
statements and the related notes that appear elsewhere in this document.
BUSINESS OVERVIEW
We are a global enterprise networking solutions provider incorporated in Delaware. A pioneer in the
computer networking industry, we have three global product and solutions brands H3C, 3Com, and
TippingPoint that offer high-performance networking and security solutions to enterprises large
and small. These organizations range across a number of vertical industries, including education,
finance, government, healthcare, insurance, manufacturing and real estate. The H3C®
enterprise networking portfolio one of the leading large enterprise networking equipment brands
in China includes products that span from the data center to the edge of the network and is
targeted at large enterprises. The 3Com® family of products offers a strong
price/performance value proposition for small and medium businesses. Our TippingPoint®
security brand features network-based intrusion prevention systems (IPS) and network access
control (NAC) solutions, which deliver in-depth, application, infrastructure and performance
protection.
We believe our portfolio of products and services enables customers to deploy and manage
business-critical voice, video, data and other advanced networking technologies in a secure,
scalable, reliable and efficient network environment. We believe we offer customer-driven
technology solutions that help enterprises optimize their budgets and resources, increase
productivity, and realize their business goals. 3Com designs its solutions to offer customers a
unique value proposition: lower total cost of ownership (TCO) and expert, responsive service. Our
data center-to-edge enterprise networking solutions offer a common operating system to streamline
system management, and are based on open standards to enable the use of best-of-breed applications
from other vendors. We believe we offer a broad, fresh portfolio of products and solutions that
disrupt the industry status quo.
22
We believe we deliver high-quality, high-performance converged networking solutions that provide
exceptional business value and help customers address the following fundamental challenges:
|
|
|
Performance Bandwidth demands have increased along with the number of users and
applications IP telephony, videoconferencing, streaming multimedia and others on
enterprise networks, yet performance requirements never abate. 3Com routers, switches and
security devices provide robust throughput and traffic optimization applications to ensure
high-quality networking even in the most challenging enterprise network environments. |
|
|
|
|
Cost effectiveness Todays enterprise customers are seeking cost-effective solutions
that optimize the value of their network infrastructure investment. 3Com products are
designed to be cost-effective, competitively priced and energy efficient. 3Coms
single-pane, intuitive network management platform minimizes time spent training IT staff
and network administrators, helping to further reduce overall TCO. |
|
|
|
|
Security Todays enterprises need to protect themselves from a constantly evolving
spectrum of internal and external threats to ensure the safety of their mission-critical
information. 3Coms pervasive network solutions provide granular oversight, control access,
quarantine malicious programs and files, and restore data. |
We focus on delivering superior networking solutions that offer a cost advantage to our customers
through solutions that are less expensive to acquire, power and operationally manage. Our products
are designed to provide superior value through capability design as well as other cost conscious
features such as lower power requirements, and inter-operability in multi-vendor networks.
We believe that our global presence, brand identity, strong development organization and
intellectual property portfolio provide a solid foundation for achieving our objectives.
Our products are sold on a worldwide basis through a combination of value added resellers,
distributors and direct-touch sales representatives. We also work with service providers to deliver
managed networking solutions for enterprise customers.
Headquartered in Marlborough, Massachusetts, we have worldwide operations, including sales,
marketing, research and development, and customer service and support capabilities.
Our products and services can generally be classified in the following categories:
|
|
|
Switches and routers; |
|
|
|
|
Other networking equipment; |
|
|
|
|
Security; and |
|
|
|
|
Services. |
We have introduced multiple new products targeted at the small, medium and large enterprise
markets, including a data center switch; modular and multi-service switches and routers; converged
IP solutions such as voice; video and surveillance; security; and unified switching solutions. Our
recent product introductions and future product strategy are designed to offer a compelling value
proposition to our customers, by leveraging open platform technology with options to integrate
best-of-breed application solutions directly into their networks.
Business Environment and Future Trends
We operate today in a rapidly changing business environment due to the recent global economic
slowdown and the current slow economic recovery. The last several years have been challenging due
to the global economic recession, and we have experienced reduced demand, delayed or cancelled
purchases and longer sales cycles. More recently, many regions in which we operate have stabilized
and we have experienced the beginnings of a slow economic recovery. More specifically by region,
our business is highly dependent on the Chinese economy, which has experienced strong growth in
recent years. Our success in China has been due to the success of the direct-touch enterprise
model, a mixture of core and new products and solution selling, and value creation for customers.
While we believe that China may have been less affected than other regions by the global economic
slowdown, it has experienced the effects of the downturn and our growth has slowed in China. While
Chinas growth rates have recently stabilized, it is unclear whether this stabilization will result
in increased growth rates in the future. Additionally, we have seen and expect a continued
significant reduction in sales to Huawei Technologies throughout fiscal year 2010. Outside of
China, which we call our Rest of World business, while our operations have been adversely
impacted by the global economic slowdown, we have recently witnessed a slow recovery in many
regions, although the increase in economic activity remains modest and it is not clear whether
economic conditions in
23
any particular jurisdiction will continue to improve or will experience a return to recessionary
conditions. The slow recovery is evidenced by customers exercising restraint when considering
IT-related capital spending. The above factors make it more challenging to predict our future
performance.
Our strategy to address these business conditions is to market our solutions as providing
exceptional quality for a good value and to remain competitive in the enterprise market. At the
same time, we recognize that global spending on networking products and solutions is likely to
continue to be under pressure for the foreseeable future. While the timing of a more robust
recovery is unclear, we strive to be well positioned when it occurs.
Networking industry analysts and participants differ widely in their assessments concerning the
prospects for mid to long-term industry growth, especially in light of the current weakness in many
of the major global economies. Industry factors and trends also present significant challenges in
the medium-term. Such factors and trends include intense competition in the market for higher end,
enterprise core routing and switching products and aggressive product pricing by competitors
targeted at gaining share in the small to medium-sized business market.
We believe that long-term success in this environment requires us to (1) be a global technology
leader, (2) increase our revenue and take market share from competitors outside of China, (3)
increase and sustain our profitability and (4) increase our generation of cash from operations.
Technology Strategy
We believe our principal research and development base in China provides a strong foundation for
our global product development. Our strategy involves continuing to innovate, using China as a
principal market in which to introduce new products and provide leading solutions for global
markets. Our approach is to focus on activities that deliver differentiated products and solutions
and drive reductions in product costs. Our current areas of focus include data center solutions,
security, convergence of applications over IP, advanced switching, routing solutions and other
advanced technologies.
Revenue and Market Share Goals
We believe that our differentiated, comprehensive product portfolio which provides end-to-end IP
solutions based on open standards offers a compelling value proposition for customers, particularly
in the current economic environment.
Our intention is to leverage our global footprint to more effectively sell these products. A key
element of our strategy is to increasingly focus on sales to larger enterprise and government
accounts in all of our regions.
We intend to execute on three regional strategies as follows:
|
|
|
China In China, we have been successful in direct-touch sales to enterprise and
government customers. To maintain a leadership position in China, we intend to increase our
focus on direct-touch sales as well as pursue other distribution channels. We believe that
growing market share in China will be more challenging than in the past given that we
already have a significant enterprise networking market share in China. We also intend to
continue to introduce innovative new product offerings in the China market, such as IP video
surveillance and IP storage, which may offer additional growth opportunities. |
Our strategy involves leveraging our significant China-based engineering team and strong brand of
networking solutions designed for enterprise and government accounts into greater success in
markets outside of China, as further described below.
|
|
|
Emerging markets outside of China We expect to target growth opportunities outside of
China in other developing markets. We believe that our successful penetration of the Chinese
market has provided experience that is transferable to many emerging markets. We believe
this experience will position us to gain market share in developing markets. |
|
|
|
|
Developed global markets Our goal in developed markets is to increase our market share.
Our strategy is to focus on large enterprise and government accounts and to implement this
strategy we intend to increase go to market resources. We intend to offer these customers
our comprehensive end to end solutions and highlight our products price to performance
value proposition and energy efficiency. Our goal is to be well positioned for a more robust
economic recovery and in fact we have started to see some stabilization in recent months. |
24
Profitability and Cash Generation Objectives
We believe that our long-term success is also dependent on our ability to increase our overall
profit and cash generation. We believe that by continuing to integrate our worldwide operations we
can achieve further operational efficiencies to support continued investment in sales and marketing
to grow our business. We may also continue to require targeted investments in infrastructure
designed to meet our market share growth objectives.
For our TippingPoint business we plan to focus on growing its top line and continuing to improve
operational efficiency and segment profitability. We also plan to leverage our existing sales
channels and global footprint to more effectively sell TippingPoint products and services.
The Company is also integrating our TippingPoint® IPS technology into our Networking products
to deliver a unified product line that combines security, network infrastructure and policy
management.
Significant Event
On November 11, 2009, 3Com Corporation, a Delaware corporation (3Com), entered into an
Agreement and Plan of Merger (the Merger Agreement) by and among 3Com, Hewlett-Packard Company,
a Delaware corporation (HP), and Colorado Acquisition Corporation, a Delaware corporation and a
wholly owned subsidiary of HP (Merger Sub). Upon the terms of the Merger Agreement and subject
to the terms set forth therein, Merger Sub will be merged with and into 3Com, and as a result
3Com will continue as the surviving corporation and a wholly owned subsidiary of HP (the
Merger). Pursuant to the Merger Agreement, at the closing of the Merger, each issued and
outstanding share of common stock of 3Com, other than shares owned by 3Com, HP or Merger Sub, or
by any stockholders who are entitled to and who properly exercise appraisal rights under Delaware
law, will be canceled and will be automatically converted into the right to receive $7.90 in
cash, without interest.
The parties are currently targeting completion of the merger by the end of April 2010, however the
exact timing cannot be predicted. The closing of the Merger is subject to the satisfaction or
waiver of specified closing conditions, including, without limitation, (i) the adoption of the
Merger Agreement by 3Coms stockholders and (ii) the expiration or termination of waiting periods,
and obtaining of requisite approvals or clearances, under specified antitrust and competition laws
(including, without limitation in China). On December 22, 2009, the relevant U.S. antitrust
authorities granted early termination of the waiting period under the U.S. Hart-Scott-Rodino
Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976, as amended. On February 12, 2010, the European Commission
cleared the Merger under the EU Merger Regulation. In addition, on January 26, 2010, 3Coms
stockholders adopted the Merger Agreement at a special meeting of stockholders. For a further
discussion of risks associated with the proposed acquisition, please refer to Risk Factors in
Part II, Item 1A in this Form 10-Q.
Segment Reporting
In the first quarter of fiscal 2010, we changed the measures of segment profit and segment income
to align to how we currently manage our business and report internally. Accordingly, our previously
reported segment information has been revised to reflect our new measure of segment profit and
segment income. Based on the information provided to our chief operating decision-maker (CODM)
for purposes of making decisions about allocating resources and assessing performance, we have two
primary businesses, our Networking Business and TippingPoint Security Business. Our Networking
Business consists of the following sales regions as operating segments: China-based (including
Japan and Hong Kong SAR), Asia Pacific Region excluding China-based sales region (APR), Europe
Middle East and Africa (EMEA), Latin America (LAT), and North America (NA) regions. The APR,
EMEA, LAT and NA operating segments have been aggregated given their similar economic
characteristics, products, customers and processes, and have been consolidated as one reportable
segment called, Rest of World. The China-based sales region does not meet the aggregation
criteria at this time.
The China-based and Rest of World reporting segments benefit from shared support services on a
world-wide basis. The costs associated with providing these shared central functions are not
allocated to the China-based and Rest of World reporting segments and instead are reported and
disclosed under the caption Central Functions. Central Function costs include research and
development expenses and other operating expenses. Other operating expenses in both our Central
Function costs and TippingPoint Security Business include indirect cost of sales, such as supply
chain operations expenses, indirect sales and marketing, and general and administrative support
costs.
25
Summary of Three Months Ended February 28, 2010 Financial Performance
|
|
|
Our sales in the three months ended February 28, 2010 were $345.9 million, compared to
sales of $324.7 million in the three months ended February 28, 2009, an increase of $21.2
million, or 6.5 percent. |
|
|
|
|
Our gross margin improved to 60.4 percent in the three months ended February 28, 2010
from 57.2 percent in the three months ended February 28, 2009. |
|
|
|
|
Our operating expenses (income) in the three months ended February 28, 2010 were $186.4
million, compared to $184.3 million in the three months ended February 28, 2009, a net
increase of $2.1 million, or 1.1 percent. |
|
|
|
|
Our net income in the three months ended February 28, 2010 was $41.4 million, compared
to net income of $1.9 million in the three months ended February 28, 2009. Included in net
income in the three months ended February 28, 2009 was a benefit of approximately $9.9
million as a result of a decision by the Chinese tax authorities to grant the Company key
software developer status which entitles the Company to a 10 percent tax rate in China for
the calendar year ended December 31, 2009. |
|
|
|
|
Our balance sheet contains cash and equivalents and short term investments of $795.0
million as of February 28, 2010, compared to cash and equivalents and short term
investments of $644.2 million at the end of fiscal 2009. The balance sheet also includes
long-term debt of $112 million with $48 million classified as a current liability as of
February 28, 2010, compared to long-term debt of $200 million with $48 million classified
as a current liability as of May 31, 2009. |
Summary of Nine Months Ended February 28, 2010 Financial Performance
|
|
|
Our sales in the nine months ended February 28, 2010 were $958.5 million, compared to
sales of $1,021.9 million in the nine months ended February 28, 2009, a decrease of $63.4
million, or 6.2 percent. |
|
|
|
|
Our gross margin improved to 59.4 percent in the nine months ended February 28, 2010
from 56.3 percent in the nine months ended February 28, 2009. |
|
|
|
|
Our operating expenses (income) in the nine months ended February 28, 2010 were $529.0
million, compared to $496.0 million in the nine months ended February 28, 2009, a net
increase of $33.0 million, or 6.7 percent. Included in the nine months ended February 28,
2009 operating expenses (income) is $70.0 million of income related to the Realtek patent
dispute resolution. |
|
|
|
|
Our net income in the nine months ended February 28, 2010 was $68.8 million, compared to
net income of $94.6 million in the nine months ended February 28, 2009. Included in the
nine months ended February 28, 2010, is a $10.8 million income tax benefit due to the
favorable determination of our calendar 2008 China tax rate and a benefit of approximately
$9.9 million as a result of a decision by the Chinese tax authorities to grant the Company
key software developer status which entitles the Company to a 10 percent tax rate in
China for the calendar year ended December 31, 2009. Included in the nine months ended
February 28, 2009 net income is $70.0 million of income related to the Realtek patent
dispute resolution. |
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Our critical accounting policies are described in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal
year ended May 31, 2009. There have been no significant changes to these policies during the nine
months ended February 28, 2010. These policies continue to be those that we feel are most important
to a readers ability to understand our financial results.
26
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
THREE AND NINE MONTHS ENDED FEBRUARY 28, 2010 AND 2009
The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, the percentage of total sales
represented by the line items reflected in our condensed consolidated statements of operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
February 28, |
|
February 28, |
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
Sales |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
Cost of sales |
|
|
39.6 |
|
|
|
42.8 |
|
|
|
40.6 |
|
|
|
43.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit margin |
|
|
60.4 |
|
|
|
57.2 |
|
|
|
59.4 |
|
|
|
56.3 |
|
Operating expenses (income): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales and marketing |
|
|
29.1 |
|
|
|
26.3 |
|
|
|
29.1 |
|
|
|
25.7 |
|
Research and development |
|
|
13.9 |
|
|
|
13.9 |
|
|
|
13.4 |
|
|
|
13.8 |
|
General and administrative |
|
|
6.1 |
|
|
|
8.5 |
|
|
|
7.1 |
|
|
|
7.9 |
|
Amortization |
|
|
4.8 |
|
|
|
7.1 |
|
|
|
5.3 |
|
|
|
7.2 |
|
Realtek patent resolution |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6.8 |
) |
Restructuring charges |
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses, net |
|
|
53.9 |
|
|
|
56.7 |
|
|
|
55.2 |
|
|
|
48.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
|
6.5 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
4.2 |
|
|
|
7.8 |
|
Interest income (expense), net |
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
(1.0 |
) |
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
|
|
(0.5 |
) |
Other income, net |
|
|
5.7 |
|
|
|
5.1 |
|
|
|
3.8 |
|
|
|
4.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes |
|
|
12.4 |
|
|
|
4.6 |
|
|
|
7.8 |
|
|
|
11.7 |
|
Income tax provision |
|
|
(0.4 |
) |
|
|
(4.0 |
) |
|
|
(0.6 |
) |
|
|
(2.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
12.0 |
% |
|
|
0.6 |
% |
|
|
7.2 |
% |
|
|
9.3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales
Consolidated sales for the three and nine months ended February 28, 2010 and 2009 by segment were
as follows (dollars in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
February 28, |
|
|
February 28, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
China-based sales region |
|
$ |
188.0 |
|
|
$ |
190.4 |
|
|
$ |
509.3 |
|
|
$ |
565.6 |
|
Rest of World sales region |
|
|
123.4 |
|
|
|
102.8 |
|
|
|
349.8 |
|
|
|
368.8 |
|
TippingPoint security business |
|
|
37.9 |
|
|
|
33.3 |
|
|
|
106.3 |
|
|
|
92.5 |
|
Eliminations and other |
|
|
(3.4 |
) |
|
|
(1.8 |
) |
|
|
(6.9 |
) |
|
|
(5.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated sales |
|
$ |
345.9 |
|
|
$ |
324.7 |
|
|
$ |
958.5 |
|
|
$ |
1,021.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales in our China-based sales region decreased $2.4 million, or 1.3 percent, in the three
months ended February 28, 2010 and decreased $56.3 million, or 10.0 percent in the nine months
ended February 28, 2010 compared to the same periods in the previous fiscal year. The decrease in
sales in the three and nine months ended February 28, 2010 is primarily attributable to decreased
sales to Huawei. Huawei sales decreased $43.5 million in the three months ended February 28, 2010
as compared to the same quarter in the prior fiscal year, mostly offset by an increase of $38.0
million of China direct-touch sales. Huawei sales decreased $126.8 million in the nine months ended
February 28, 2010 as compared to the same period in the prior fiscal year, partially offset by an
increase of $69.4 million of China direct-touch sales. The increase in China direct-touch sales in
the three months ended February 28, 2010 primarily relates to increased sales of $21.8 million and
$6.7 million, respectively, of our switches and WLAN products. The increase in China direct-touch
sales in the nine months ended February 28, 2010 primarily relates to increased sales of $28.5
million and $27.7 million, respectively, of our switches and WLAN . When compared to our first and
second quarters of fiscal 2010, however, our China-based sales regions revenues for the three
months ended February 28, 2010 increased by $36.0 million and $18.7 million, respectively,
reflecting the traction we have made with our China-direct touch sales force.
27
Sales in our Rest of World sales region increased $20.6 million, or 20.0 percent, in the three
months ended February 28, 2010 but decreased $19.0 million, or 5.2 percent in the nine months ended
February 28, 2010 compared to the same periods in the previous fiscal year. The increase in sales
in the three months ended February 28, 2010 is primarily attributable to increased sales volume in
all of regions reflecting the slow economic recovery and market stabilization and increased demand
for our H3C products in our rest of world sales regions. The decrease in sales in the nine months
February 28, 2010 is primarily attributable to decreased sales volume in all of our regions in the
first half of fiscal 2010 as compared to the first half of fiscal 2009 as we experienced longer
sales cycles, delayed or cancelled purchases and reduced incoming orders because of the global
economic downturn that began in fiscal 2009. In our fiscal third quarter of 2010, we saw year over
increased sales volume and new product sales reflecting the slow economic recovery and market
stabilization we have recently experienced as compared to the same period of the prior fiscal year.
When compared to our first and second quarters of fiscal 2010, our Rest of World revenues for the
three months ended February 28, 2010 increased by $16.2 million and $4.1 million, respectively,
reflecting the slow economic recovery and market stabilization we have recently experienced.
Sales in our TippingPoint security business increased $4.6 million, or 13.8 percent, in the three
months ended February 28, 2010 and increased $13.8 million, or 14.9 percent in the nine months
ended February 28, 2010 compared to the same periods in the previous fiscal year. The increase in
sales in both the three and nine months ended February 28, 2010 is driven both by our hardware and
maintenance business. Product sales increased $2.1 million and $5.0 million, respectively, due in
large part to introduction of new products and increased investment in selling and marketing
expenses. Higher maintenance renewal rates coupled with increased contracts drove an increase in
maintenance revenue $2.5 million and $8.8 million, respectively.
Consolidated sales increased by $21.2 million, or 6.5 percent, in the three months ended February
28, 2010 but decreased by $63.4 million, or 6.2 percent, in the nine months ended February 28, 2010
compared to the same period in the previous fiscal year. The increase in the three months ended
February 28, 2010 compared to the same periods in the prior fiscal year is primarily due to
increased China direct-touch sales and increased sales in our Rest of World sales region due to the
slow economic recovery and market stabilization and increased demand for our H3C products,
partially offset by decreased sales to Huawei. The decrease in the nine months ended February 28,
2010 compared to the same periods in the prior fiscal year is primarily due to a decrease of $126.8
million in sales to Huawei, partially offset by increased China direct-touch sales. When compared
to our first and second quarters of fiscal 2010, our consolidated sales for the three months ended
February 28, 2010 increased by $55.4 million and $23.7 million, respectively, reflecting the slow
economic recovery and market stabilization we have recently experienced.
Sales by major product categories are as follows (dollars in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended February 28, |
|
Nine Months Ended February 28, |
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Switches and routers |
|
$ |
234.4 |
|
|
|
68 |
% |
|
$ |
227.6 |
|
|
|
70 |
% |
|
$ |
643.2 |
|
|
|
67 |
% |
|
$ |
738.3 |
|
|
|
72 |
% |
Other networking equipment |
|
|
48.5 |
|
|
|
14 |
% |
|
|
41.7 |
|
|
|
13 |
% |
|
|
141.3 |
|
|
|
15 |
% |
|
|
126.3 |
|
|
|
13 |
% |
Security |
|
|
48.3 |
|
|
|
14 |
% |
|
|
43.5 |
|
|
|
13 |
% |
|
|
135.4 |
|
|
|
14 |
% |
|
|
122.7 |
|
|
|
12 |
% |
Services |
|
|
14.7 |
|
|
|
4 |
% |
|
|
11.9 |
|
|
|
4 |
% |
|
|
38.6 |
|
|
|
4 |
% |
|
|
34.6 |
|
|
|
3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
345.9 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
$ |
324.7 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
$ |
958.5 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
$ |
1,021.9 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Switches and routers revenue includes sales of our Layer 2 and Layer 3 stackable 10/100/1000
managed switching lines, our modular switching lines and routers. Sales of these products
increased $6.8 million or 2.9 percent in the three months ended February 28, 2010 but decreased
$95.1 million or 12.9 percent in the nine months ended February 28, 2010 compared to the same
periods in the previous fiscal year. The increase in sales in the three months ended February 28,
2010 was primarily driven by increased sales in our Rest of World sales region of our H3C sourced
products as well as increased China direct touch sales, partially offset by decreased volume to
Huawei when compared with corresponding periods in the prior fiscal year. The decrease in sales in
the nine months ended February 28, 2010 was primarily driven by decreased sales volume to Huawei
when compared with corresponding periods in the prior fiscal year.
Other networking equipment revenue includes sales of our VCX and NBX® voice-over-internet
protocol, or VoIP, IP storage, IP surveillance and our WLAN products. Sales of our other networking
equipment products increased $6.8 million or 16.3 percent in the three months ended February 28,
2010 and $15.0 million, or 11.9 percent, in the nine months ended February 28, 2010 compared to the
same period in the previous fiscal year. The increase in sales of our other networking products in
the three months ended February 28, 2010 was primarily due to increased WLAN sales of $6.6 million.
The increase in sales of our other networking products in the nine months ended February 28, 2010
was primarily due to increased WLAN sales of $27.8 million, partially offset by decreased voice
sales of $9.9 million.
28
Security revenue includes our TippingPoint products and services, as well as other security
products, such as our embedded firewall, or EFW and virtual private network, or VPN, products.
Sales of our security products increased $4.8 million or 11.0 percent in the three months ended
February 28, 2010 and $12.7 million, or 10.4 percent for the nine months ended February 28, 2010
compared to the same periods in the previous fiscal year. The increase in the three and nine months
ended February 29, 2010 is primarily driven by the combined factors of new product introductions
due to increased selling and marketing investments as well as our maintenance renewal business
which saw higher renewal rates and an increase in the number of maintenance contracts.
Services revenue includes professional services and maintenance contracts, excluding TippingPoint
maintenance which is included in security revenue. Services revenue increased $2.8 million or 23.5
percent in the three months ended February 28, 2010 and $4.0 million, or 11.6 percent, in the nine
months ended February 28, 2010 compared to the same period in the previous fiscal year. The
increase in sales in the three and nine months ended February 28, 2010 was driven primarily by
increased service sales tied to growth in our China direct-touch sales.
Gross Margin Percentage
Gross margin for the three and nine months ended February 28, 2010 and 2009 by segment was as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
February 28, |
|
February 28, |
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
Networking business |
|
|
57.6 |
% |
|
|
55.8 |
% |
|
|
56.8 |
% |
|
|
54.9 |
% |
TippingPoint security business |
|
|
78.0 |
% |
|
|
66.6 |
% |
|
|
76.0 |
% |
|
|
67.7 |
% |
Consolidated margin |
|
|
60.4 |
% |
|
|
57.2 |
% |
|
|
59.4 |
% |
|
|
56.3 |
% |
Gross margin in our Networking business improved 1.8 points to 57.6 percent in the three
months ended February 28, 2010 from 55.8 percent, and 1.9 points to 56.8 percent in the nine months
ended February 28, 2010 from 54.9 percent in the same periods in the previous fiscal year. The
improvement in gross profit margin for the three and nine months ended February 28, 2010 is
primarily explained by higher standard margins in our China-based sales region driven by customer
mix as our sales to Huawei continue to decrease and higher standard margins in our Rest of World
sales region driven by product mix due to a higher proportion of sales of our H3C sourced products.
Gross margin in our TippingPoint security business increased 11.4 points to 78.0 percent in the
three months ended February 28, 2010 from 66.6 percent in the same period of the previous fiscal
year. In the nine months ended February 28, 2010 gross margin increased 8.3 points to 76.0 percent
from 67.7 percent in the same period of the previous fiscal year.
The improvement in gross profit margin in the three months ended February 28, 2010 is primarily due
to the inclusion in the three months ended February 28, 2009 of a reserve for excess and obsolete
inventory of approximately $3.5 million which did not recur in the three months ended February 28,
2010.
The improvement in gross profit margin in the nine months ended February 28, 2010 is primarily due
to the nine months ended February 28, 2009 an increase in standard margins of 2 percent, increased
sales as well as the nine months ended February 28, 2009 having included a reserve for excess and
obsolete inventory of approximately $3.5 million which did not recur in the nine months ended
February 28, 2010.
Gross margin on a consolidated basis increased 3.2 points to 60.4 percent in the three months ended
February 28, 2010 from 57.2 percent, and 3.0 percent to 59.4 percent in the nine months ended
February 28, 2010 from 56.3 in the same period in the previous fiscal year. This increase in the
three and nine months ended February 28, 2010 is due principally to the segment specific items
discussed above.
29
Operating Expenses (Income)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
February 28, |
|
|
Change |
|
|
February 28, |
|
|
Change |
|
(dollars in millions) |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
% |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
% |
|
Sales and marketing |
|
$ |
100.5 |
|
|
$ |
85.5 |
|
|
$ |
15.0 |
|
|
|
18 |
% |
|
$ |
279.1 |
|
|
$ |
262.9 |
|
|
$ |
16.2 |
|
|
|
6 |
% |
Research and development |
|
|
48.0 |
|
|
|
45.2 |
|
|
|
2.8 |
|
|
|
6 |
% |
|
|
128.4 |
|
|
|
141.6 |
|
|
|
(13.2 |
) |
|
|
(9 |
)% |
General and administrative |
|
|
21.3 |
|
|
|
27.6 |
|
|
|
(6.3 |
) |
|
|
(23 |
)% |
|
|
68.5 |
|
|
|
80.7 |
|
|
|
(12.2 |
) |
|
|
(15 |
)% |
Amortization |
|
|
16.5 |
|
|
|
23.1 |
|
|
|
(6.6 |
) |
|
|
(29 |
)% |
|
|
50.3 |
|
|
|
73.4 |
|
|
|
(23.1 |
) |
|
|
(31 |
)% |
Patent dispute resolution |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(70.0 |
) |
|
|
70.0 |
|
|
|
* |
|
Restructuring charges |
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
2.9 |
|
|
|
(2.8 |
) |
|
|
(97 |
)% |
|
|
2.7 |
|
|
|
7.4 |
|
|
|
(4.7 |
) |
|
|
(64 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses, net |
|
$ |
186.4 |
|
|
$ |
184.3 |
|
|
$ |
2.1 |
|
|
|
1 |
% |
|
$ |
529.0 |
|
|
$ |
496.0 |
|
|
$ |
33.0 |
|
|
|
7 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* - |
|
percentage calculation not meaningful. |
Sales and Marketing
The most significant factors in the increase in the three months ended February 28, 2010 compared
to the same period in fiscal 2009 was increased agent commissions on China direct-touch sales,
increased commissions on higher sales in our Rest of World sales region and increased headcount as
we transition to an enterprise sales model. The most significant factor in the increase in the
nine months ended February 28, 2010 compared to the same period in fiscal 2009 was increased agent
commissions on China direct-touch sales.
Research and Development
The most significant factor contributing to the increase in the three months ended February 28,
2010 compared to the same period in fiscal 2009 was increased research and development activities
as well as increased incentive based compensation in the period. The most significant factor
contributing to the decrease in the nine months ended February 28, 2010 compared to the same period
in fiscal 2009 was savings from integration and consolidation of our Networking research and
development to China.
General and Administrative
The most significant factor in the decrease in the three months ended February 28, 2010 compared to
the same period in fiscal 2009 was the recognition of $4.0 million of non-recurring gains in the
current quarter, more specifically, a $2.3 million gain related to a class action lawsuit, a $1.1
million sale of a state tax receivable, a $0.4 million legal settlement and a $0.2 million VAT
recovery. Additionally, in the prior quarter we experienced legal fees of $2.4 million related to
patent settlements and a $1.2 million property impairment, and in the current period we incurred
$2.8 million of HP acquisition-related expenses.
The most significant factor in the decrease in the nine months ended February 28, 2010 compared to
the same period in fiscal 2009 was the absence of certain non-recurring expenses in the current
period that were present in fiscal 2009. More specifically, in the prior period we experienced
legal fees of $7.3 million related to patent settlements, $0.8 million of TippingPoint stand alone
audit fees and $0.8 million of TippingPoint retention bonuses. Additionally, in the current period
we recognized $4.0 million of non-recurring gains more specifically, a $2.3 million
gain related to a class action lawsuit, a $1.1 million sale of a state tax receivable, a $0.4
million legal settlement and a $0.2 million VAT recovery, partially offset by $7.4 million of HP
acquisition-related expenses.
Amortization
Amortization decreased $6.6 million and $23.1 million in the three and nine months ended February
28, 2010, respectively, when compared to the previous fiscal year due primarily to our Huawei
non-compete agreement and certain intangible assets from our Roving Planet acquisition becoming
fully amortized during fiscal 2009.
Patent dispute resolution
The Company and Realtek Group reached an agreement with respect to certain networking
technologies of the Company
30
that resolved a long-standing patent dispute between the companies. Under the terms of the
agreement, Realtek paid the Company $70.0 million, all of which was received in the three months
ended August 31, 2008.
The Company recognized the full $70.0 million as operating income in the first quarter of fiscal
2009.
Restructuring Charges
Net restructuring charges in the three months ended February 28, 2010 consisted of $0.1 million for
severance and outplacement costs and relate primarily to continuation of programs initiated in
prior periods. Net restructuring charges in the nine months ended February 28, 2010 consisted of
$2.6 million for severance and outplacement costs and $0.1 million for facilities-related charges
primarily related to severance for certain of our sales and marketing employees as the Company
continues to shift our focus increasingly on the larger enterprise market.
Net restructuring charges in the three months ended February 28, 2009 consisted of $2.9 million for
severance and outplacement costs and relate primarily to our TippingPoint integration. Net
restructuring charges in the nine months ended February 28, 2009 consisted of $6.0 million for
severance and outplacement costs and $1.4 million for facilities-related charges.
See Note 5 to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for a more detailed discussion of
restructuring charges.
Interest Expense, Net
In the three months ended February 28, 2010 the Company earned $0.7 million of net interest income,
versus net interest expense of $3.3 million in same period of the prior fiscal year. In the nine
months ended February 28, 2010, the Company incurred $2.3 million in net interest expense, versus
net interest expense of $5.1 million in same period of the prior fiscal year. The increase in net
interest income reflects decreased interest expense due to the decreased principal balance of our
long term debt from $213 million in our fiscal 2009 third quarter to $112 million in the current
fiscal quarter as well as the decreased interest expense due to a lower LIBOR rate on the loan.
Other Income, Net
Other income, net was $19.7 million in the three months ended February 28, 2010, an increase of
$3.2 million compared to the three months ended February 28, 2009. Other income, net was $37.1
million in the nine months ended February 28, 2010, a decrease of $8.2 million compared to the nine
months ended February 28, 2009. The increase in the three months ended February 28, 2010 was
primarily due to an increase in amounts received under an operating subsidy program by the Chinese
VAT authorities in the form of a partial refund of VAT taxes collected by our China-based sales
region from purchasers of software products. In the three months ended February 28, 2010 we
collected four months of refunds in the quarter compared to 3 months in the prior fiscal year. We
collected September 2009s refund in October 2009 which falls in our fiscal third quarter. The
subsidy payments are taken into income on a cash basis. The decrease in the nine months ended
February 28, 2010 was primarily due to foreign exchanges losses in fiscal 2010 of $0.2 million
compared to foreign currency gains in fiscal 2009 of $6.6 million as well as a decrease in amounts
received under the operating subsidy program by the Chinese VAT authorities. The timing of the
receipt of payments, the manner in which they are calculated, and the continuation of the program,
are subject to the discretion of the Chinese VAT authorities. This program is scheduled to
terminate on December 31, 2010.
31
Income Tax Provision
The income tax provision in all periods was the result of providing for taxes in certain foreign
jurisdictions at the prevailing statutory tax rates. We recorded an income tax expense of $1.3
million for the three months ended February 28, 2010, compared to an income tax expense of $12.8
million in the corresponding period of the previous fiscal year. The three months ended February
28, 2010 included a benefit of approximately $9.9 million as a result of a decision by the Chinese
tax authorities to grant the Company Key Software development Enterprise status which entitles
the Company to a 10 percent tax rate in China for the calendar year ended December 31, 2009. Prior
to this ruling, the Company had recorded taxes at a rate of 15 percent in China. By comparison,
the three months ended February 28, 2009 included a $12.1 million tax provision related to a change
in the applicable tax rate in China from 10 percent to 15 percent.
For the nine months ended February 28, 2010, we recorded income tax expense of $6.0 million
compared to income tax expense of $24.9 million in the corresponding period of the previous fiscal
year. In addition to the tax benefits recorded in the third quarter of fiscal 2010, the Company
recorded a tax benefit in the second quarter of fiscal 2010 related to the favorable resolution of
our 2008 tax rate in China resulting in a $10.8 million benefit. During the three and nine months
ended February 28, 2010, taxes on our China based subsidiary were recorded at 10 percent compared
to 15 percent for the three and nine months ended February 28, 2009.
Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recorded at the expected future tax rate in China of 15
percent.
Segment Analysis (tables in thousands)
The results of our regional Networking segments, Central Functions, and our TippingPoint Security
business as our CODM reviews their profitability are presented below.
China-based sales region:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
Nine months ended |
|
|
|
February 28, |
|
|
February 28, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Sales |
|
$ |
187,963 |
|
|
$ |
190,385 |
|
|
$ |
509,273 |
|
|
$ |
565,597 |
|
Standard margin |
|
|
133,300 |
|
|
|
128,160 |
|
|
|
353,397 |
|
|
|
375,588 |
|
Direct sales and marketing expenses |
|
|
43,109 |
|
|
|
36,581 |
|
|
|
117,520 |
|
|
|
106,194 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment contribution profit |
|
$ |
90,191 |
|
|
$ |
91,579 |
|
|
$ |
235,877 |
|
|
$ |
269,394 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment contribution profit in the three months ended February 28, 2010 decreased $1.4 million to
$90.2 million when compared to the same period of the prior fiscal year. Segment contribution
profit in the nine months ended February 28, 2010 decreased $33.5 million to $235.9 million when
compared to the same period of the prior fiscal year. Segment contribution profit is standard
margin less segment direct sales and marketing expenses. The decrease in the three and nine months
ended February 28, 2010 was primarily driven by decreased sales to Huawei and increased agent
commissions on higher China direct-touch sales. These decreases to segment contribution profit were
partially offset by increased China direct-touch sales which carried higher margins and increased
sales to Japan and Hong Kong.
Rest of World sales region:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
Nine months ended |
|
|
|
February 28, |
|
|
February 28, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Sales |
|
$ |
123,401 |
|
|
$ |
102,836 |
|
|
$ |
349,862 |
|
|
$ |
368,838 |
|
Standard margin |
|
|
79,033 |
|
|
|
61,365 |
|
|
|
215,553 |
|
|
|
215,479 |
|
Direct sales and marketing expenses |
|
|
26,354 |
|
|
|
23,360 |
|
|
|
75,663 |
|
|
|
77,254 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment contribution profit |
|
$ |
52,679 |
|
|
$ |
38,005 |
|
|
$ |
139,890 |
|
|
$ |
138,225 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32
Segment contribution profit in the three months ended February 28, 2010 increased $14.7 million to
$52.7 million when compared to the same period of the prior fiscal year. Segment contribution
profit in the nine months ended February 28, 2010 increased $1.7 million to $139.9 million when
compared to the same periods of the prior fiscal year. Segment contribution profit is standard
margin less segment direct sales and marketing expenses. The increase in the three months ended
February 28, 2010 primarily relates to higher standard margins due primarily to increases in
average selling prices and increased sales volume of our H3C enterprise solutions which carry
higher margins. The increase in the nine months ended February 28, 2010 primarily relates to higher
standard margins due primarily to increases in average selling prices and increased sales volume of
our H3C enterprise solutions, partially offset by decreased sales in all regions due primarily to
decreased volume as we experienced longer sales cycles, delayed or cancelled purchases and reduced
incoming orders in the first half of fiscal 2010 as compared to the first half of 2009 because of
the global economic downturn.
Central Functions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
Nine months ended |
|
|
|
February 28, |
|
|
February 28, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Research and development expenses |
|
$ |
40,409 |
|
|
$ |
37,574 |
|
|
$ |
107,429 |
|
|
$ |
118,603 |
|
Other operating expenses |
|
|
61,567 |
|
|
|
56,146 |
|
|
|
170,062 |
|
|
|
177,697 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cost and expenses |
|
$ |
101,976 |
|
|
$ |
93,720 |
|
|
$ |
277,491 |
|
|
$ |
296,300 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total costs and expenses in the three months ended February 28, 2010 increased $8.3 million to
$102.0 million when compared to the same period of the prior fiscal year. Total costs and expenses
in the nine months ended February 28, 2010 decreased $18.8 million to $277.5 million when compared
to the same period of the prior fiscal year. Other operating expenses include supply chain costs,
general and administrative costs and central marketing costs excluding those included in
Eliminations and Other. The increase in the three months ended February 28, 2010 was primarily
related to increased supply chain costs well as increased research and development costs due to
increased incentive based compensation in China. The decrease in the nine months ended February
28, 2010 was primarily related to continued savings from integration of research and development,
lower compensation charges due to headcount reductions and lower discretionary spending,
specifically in travel and entertainment.
TippingPoint Security business:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
Nine months ended |
|
|
|
February 28, |
|
|
February 28, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Sales |
|
$ |
37,898 |
|
|
$ |
33,284 |
|
|
$ |
106,334 |
|
|
$ |
92,499 |
|
Standard margin |
|
|
32,076 |
|
|
|
28,288 |
|
|
|
89,960 |
|
|
|
76,962 |
|
Direct sales and marketing expenses |
|
|
13,543 |
|
|
|
10,882 |
|
|
|
37,325 |
|
|
|
32,873 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment contribution profit |
|
|
18,533 |
|
|
|
17,406 |
|
|
|
52,635 |
|
|
|
44,089 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research and development expenses |
|
|
7,050 |
|
|
|
7,103 |
|
|
|
19,499 |
|
|
|
20,698 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment income |
|
$ |
11,483 |
|
|
$ |
10,303 |
|
|
$ |
33,136 |
|
|
$ |
23,391 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TippingPoint segment income in the three months ended February 28, 2010 was $11.5 million compared
to segment income of $10.3 million in the same period of the prior fiscal year. TippingPoint
segment income in the nine months ended February 28, 2010 was $33.1 million compared to segment
income of $23.4 million in the same periods of the prior fiscal year. Segment income is standard
margin less direct sales and marketing and research and development expenses, excluding those
included in Eliminations and Other. The increase in the three and nine months ended February 28,
2010 was due primarily to higher sales of both maintenance contracts and new products partially
offset by increased sales and marketing expenses primarily due to increased headcount and increased
commissions on higher bookings.
33
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Cash and equivalents and short-term investments as of February 28, 2010 were $795.0 million, an
increase of $150.8 million compared to the balance of $644.2 million as of May 31, 2009. These
balances were comprised of the following (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
February 28, |
|
|
May 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Cash and equivalents |
|
$ |
795.0 |
|
|
$ |
545.8 |
|
Short-term investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
98.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and equivalents and short-term investments |
|
$ |
795.0 |
|
|
$ |
644.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table shows the major components of our condensed consolidated statements of cash
flows for the nine months ended February 28, 2010 and 2009 (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended February 28, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Cash and equivalents, beginning of period |
|
$ |
545.8 |
|
|
$ |
503.6 |
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
224.8 |
|
|
|
196.3 |
|
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities |
|
|
87.5 |
|
|
|
(12.5 |
) |
Net cash used in financing activities |
|
|
(63.7 |
) |
|
|
(136.3 |
) |
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and equivalents |
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
8.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and equivalents, end of period |
|
$ |
795.0 |
|
|
$ |
560.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities was $224.8 million for the nine months ended February 28,
2010 compared to $196.3 million in the nine months ended February 28, 2009. The increase was
primarily due to improvements in working capital, specifically accounts and notes receivable and an
increase in accounts payables and deferred revenue as compared to the same period last year,
partially offset by a decrease in net income of $25.7 million due to the patent dispute resolution
of $70 million that was recorded in the prior year.
In the nine months ended February 28, 2010, inventory increased as we positioned the company to
meet the demands of the economic recovery. In the nine months ended February 28, 2009, accounts and
notes receivable increased as a result of significant sales increases during those periods, accounts payable decreased significantly as a result of the timing of payments.
Net cash provided by investing activities was $87.5 million for the nine months ended February 28,
2010, resulting primarily from $98.7 million of proceeds for the maturity of short-term
investments, partially offset by $11.2 million of outflows related to purchases of property and
equipment.
Net cash used in financing activities was $63.7 million in the nine months ended February 28, 2010.
During the nine months ended February 28, 2010, we made a principal payment of $88.0 million
related to our long term debt, $40 million of which was a voluntary prepayment. We had proceeds of
$28.5 million from issuances of our common stock upon exercise of stock options, partially offset
by $4.2 million of repurchases of shares of restricted stock awards and units upon vesting from
employees, including those shares to satisfy the tax withholding obligations that arise in
connection with such vesting.
On September 28, 2009 we made a $48 million scheduled debt payment on the Companys credit facility
and a $40 million voluntary prepayment which the Company did not incur a penalty for, all of which
was applied to reduce our fiscal year 2013 Tranche B principal balance.
Remaining payments on the $112 million principal balance outstanding on the Companys credit
facility after our September 28, 2009 payment are due on September 28, of each year as follows, (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Calendar Year |
|
3Com Fiscal Year |
|
Tranche A |
|
Tranche B |
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
|
46,000 |
|
|
|
2,000 |
|
2011 |
|
|
2012 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,000 |
|
2012 |
|
|
2013 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
44,000 |
|
34
On September 28, 2009 our applicable LIBOR rates reset to 0.64 percent and the effective interest
rate for the six months from that date will be 2.14 percent for the Tranche A Term Facility and
3.64 percent for the Tranche B Term Facility. On March 29, 2010 the LIBOR rates reset to 0.44
percent and the effective interest rate will be 1.94 percent for the Tranche A Term Facility and
3.44 percent for the Tranche B Term Facility and will remain the rates until Septemer 29, 2010.
As of February 28, 2010, bank-issued standby letters of credit and guarantees totaled $7.0 million,
including $6.0 million relating to potential foreign tax, custom, and duty assessments. We provide
the bank with cash collateral for 100 percent of these amounts.
On June 8, 2009, we renewed a lease on our Marlborough, MA facility. The lease is for a ten year
and two month term from June 1, 2009 through and including July 31, 2019. Under the terms of the
lease agreement with landlord Bel Marlborough I LLC we will pay an average annual rent of $3.0
million per year. These lease payments were included in the contractual obligations table in our
Form 10-K for the period ended May 31, 2009.
We currently have no material capital expenditure purchase commitments other than ordinary course
purchases of computer hardware, software and leasehold improvements.
In recent years, we have generated most of our positive cash flow from our China operations. Our
capital requirements in Rest of World have been met from cash flow from operations as well as from
existing cash balances and permitted dividends from China. Dividends from our China operations to
our Rest of World operations are generally subject to the following restrictions: (1) a 10 percent
reserve requirement imposed by PRC law (capped at 50 percent of registered capital), which was
$43.9 million at February 28, 2010), (2) a 5 percent withholding tax imposed by the PRC on profits
earned on or after January 1, 2008 and (3) a credit agreement restriction limiting our ability to
dividend cash outside of the H3C Group and requiring that a specified percentage of excess cash
flow from China be annually used to prepay debt. There are also administrative requirements for
making dividends out of China that involve filings with government agencies seeking approval to pay
a dividend. Government officials can dictate when we can pay a dividend and can specify specific
terms or conditions for making the payment. As of February 28, 2010 the H3C Groups net assets were
$877.3 million and are subject to these dividend restrictions.
An important exception to the credit agreement restriction permits us to annually dividend from
China to Rest of World the percentage of H3Cs excess cash flow that is not required to be prepaid
to the banks under the terms of the agreement, provided that certain conditions are met. In the
nine months ended February 28, 2010 we used this exception and made dividend payments of $155.0
million. No dividends were made to our parent company. We have no prepayment penalty on our loan
and at this time our cash and equivalents balances significantly exceed our outstanding principal
loan balance.
In Rest of World we currently do not generate positive cash flow. As a result of these factors, we
intend to continue to manage cash and monitor discretionary cash spending, especially in periods
prior to receipt of any available and permitted annual dividend payments from China.
On May 25, 2007, our subsidiary H3C Holdings Limited (Borrower) entered into an amended and
restated credit agreement with various lenders, including Goldman Sachs Credit Partners L.P., as
Mandated Lead Arranger, Bookrunner, Administrative Agent and Syndication Agent, and Industrial and
Commercial Bank of China (Asia) Limited, as Collateral Agent (the Credit Agreement). Under the
original credit agreement, the Borrower borrowed $430 million in the form of a senior secured term
loan with two tranches (Tranche A and Tranche B) to finance a portion of the purchase price for
3Coms acquisition of 49 percent of H3C Technologies Co., Limited, or H3C. Remaining principal is
$112 million as of February 28, 2010 and the final loan maturity date is on September 28, 2012.
Interest on borrowings is payable semi-annually on March 28 and September 28. All amounts
outstanding under the Tranche A Term Facility will bear interest, at the Borrowers option, at the
(i) LIBOR, or (ii) Base Rate (i.e., prime rate), in each case plus the applicable margin percentage
set forth in the table below, which is based on a leverage ratio of consolidated indebtedness of
the Borrower and its subsidiaries to EBITDA (as defined in the Credit Agreement) for the relevant
twelve-month period:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Leverage Ratio |
|
LIBOR + |
|
Base Rate + |
>3.0:1.0 |
|
|
2.25 |
% |
|
|
1.25 |
% |
≤3.0:1.0 but > 2.0:1.0 |
|
|
2.00 |
% |
|
|
1.00 |
% |
≤2.0:1.0 but > 1.0:1.0 |
|
|
1.75 |
% |
|
|
0.75 |
% |
≤1.0:1.0 |
|
|
1.50 |
% |
|
|
0.50 |
% |
35
All amounts outstanding under the Tranche B Term Facility will bear interest, at the Borrowers
option, at the (i) LIBOR plus 3 percent or (ii) Base Rate (i.e., prime rate) plus 2 percent. We
have elected to use LIBOR as the reference rate for borrowings to date, and expect to do so for the
foreseeable future. Applicable LIBOR rates at February 28, 2010 were 0.64 percent and the effective
interest rate is currently 2.14 percent for the Tranche A Term Facility and 3.64 percent for the
Tranche B Term Facility.
Covenants and other restrictions under the Credit Agreement apply to the Borrower and its
subsidiaries, which we refer to as the H3C Group, but not to 3Coms Rest of World reporting units
or TippingPoint. The loans are secured by assets at the H3C level. H3C also guarantees the loans.
The loans may be prepaid in whole or in part without premium or penalty if paid at the time of
making a semi-annual interest payment. The Borrower will be required to make mandatory prepayments
using net proceeds from H3C Group (i) asset sales, (ii) insurance proceeds and (iii) equity
offerings or debt incurrence. In addition, the Borrower will be required to make annual prepayments
in an amount equal to 75 percent of excess cash flow of the H3C Group. This percentage will
decrease to the extent that the Borrowers leverage ratio is lower than specified amounts. Any
excess cash flow amounts not required to prepay the loan may be distributed to and used by the
Companys other segments, provided certain conditions are met.
The Borrower must maintain a minimum debt service coverage, minimum interest coverage, maximum
capital expenditures and a maximum total leverage ratio. Negative covenants restrict, among other
things, (i) the incurrence of indebtedness by the Borrower and its subsidiaries, (ii) the making of
dividends and distributions to 3Coms other segments, (iii) the ability to make investments
including in new subsidiaries, (iv) the ability to undertake mergers and acquisitions and (v) sales
of assets. Also, cash dividends from the PRC subsidiaries to H3C, and H3C to the Borrower, will be
subject to restricted use pending payment of principal, interest and excess cash flow prepayments.
Standard events of default and defaulted interest rates apply.
Our Merger Agreement with HP generally prohibits us from raising equity or debt capital, or paying
dividends to 3Com stockholders, without first obtaining HPs prior written consent, which consent
may not be unreasonably withheld, delayed or conditioned.
The final cash payment requirement under the H3C EARP (Equity Appreciation Rights Plan) is expected
to occur in the spring of calendar 2010 in the amount of approximately $14 million.
We believe that our future cash requirements will likely include an aggregate of $2 million to $5
million for professional and other fees related to our proposed acquisition by HP that are not
contingent on the closing of the deal.
We currently believe that our existing cash and equivalents and cash generated from future
operations will be sufficient to satisfy our anticipated cash requirements and required loan
payments for at least the next 12 months.
EFFECTS OF RECENTLY ISSUED ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
Accounting Pronouncements The Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) is the authoritative
body for financial accounting and reporting in the United States. On July 31, 2009, the FASB
Accounting Standards Codification (the Codification) became the authoritative source of
accounting principles to be applied to the financial statements of nongovernmental entities
prepared in accordance with GAAP. The following is a list of recent pronouncements issued by the
FASB:
36
Recently Issued and Adopted Accounting Pronouncements
Business Combinations: Effective in the first quarter of fiscal 2010, the Company adopted the
revised accounting guidance for business combinations. The more significant changes include an
expanded definition of a business and a business combination; recognition of assets acquired,
liabilities assumed and noncontrolling interests (including goodwill) measured at fair value at the
acquisition date; recognition of acquisition-related expenses and restructuring costs separately
from the business combination; recognition of assets acquired and liabilities assumed at their
acquisition-date fair values with subsequent changes recognized in earnings; and capitalization of
in-process research and development at fair value as an indefinite-lived intangible asset. The
guidance also amends and clarifies the application issues on initial recognition and measurement,
subsequent measurement and accounting, and disclosure of assets and liabilities arising from
contingencies in a business combination. The impact of this accounting guidance and its relevant
updates on the Companys results of operations or financial position will vary depending on each
specific business combination or asset purchase. The Company has not had any business combinations
or asset purchases since the adoption of this pronouncement.
Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements: The pronouncement requires the
noncontrolling interest in the equity of a subsidiary be accounted for and reported as equity,
provides revised guidance on the treatment and presentation of net income and losses attributable
to the noncontrolling interest and changes in ownership interests in a subsidiary, and requires
additional disclosures that identify and distinguish between the interests of the controlling and
noncontrolling owners. The Company adopted the pronouncement in the first quarter of fiscal 2010.
The adoption did not have any impact on the Companys Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures: The pronouncements define fair value, establish guidelines
for measuring fair value, and expand disclosures regarding fair value measurements. In the first
quarter of fiscal 2010, the Company adopted the fair value measurements guidance for all
nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities recognized or disclosed at fair value in the
financial statements on a nonrecurring basis. The adoption did not have a material impact on the
Companys Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements. See Note 3 of Notes to Condensed
Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information. The Company did not chose the fair
value option which allows entities to choose to measure many financial instruments and certain
other items at fair value that previously were not required to be measured at fair value.
In the second quarter of fiscal 2010, the Company adopted the fair value disclosure provision that
requires the reporting of interim disclosures about the fair value of financial instruments
previously only disclosed on an annual basis. The adoption did not have any impact on the Companys
Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements as it relates only to disclosures. The required
disclosures are included in Note 3 of Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
Impairments of Debt Securities: The pronouncement changed the impairment recognition and
presentation model for debt securities. An other-than-temporary impairment is now triggered when
there is intent to sell the security, it is more likely than not that the security will be required
to be sold before recovery in value, or the security is not expected to recover its entire
amortized cost basis (credit related loss). Credit related losses on debt securities will be
considered an other-than-temporary impairment recognized in earnings, and any other losses due to a
decline in fair value relative to the amortized cost deemed not to be other-than-temporary will be
recorded in other comprehensive income. The Company adopted the pronouncement in the second quarter
of fiscal 2010. The adoption did not have a material impact on the Companys Condensed Consolidated
Financial Statements.
Earnings Per Share: The pronouncement provided guidance on determining whether instruments granted
in share-based payment transactions are participating securities. Non-vested share-based payment
awards that contain non-forfeitable rights to dividends or dividend equivalents are participating
securities and, therefore, are included in computing earnings per share (EPS) pursuant to the
two-class method. The two-class method determines earnings per share for each class of common stock
and participating securities according to dividends or dividend equivalents and their respective
participation rights in undistributed earnings. The company adopted this pronouncement in the first
quarter of fiscal 2010. The adoption had no material effect on basic or diluted EPS for any of the
periods presented in these Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
Recently Issued but Not Yet Adopted Accounting Pronouncements
Revenue Arrangements with Multiple Deliverables: The guidance amends the current revenue
recognition guidance for multiple deliverable arrangements. It allows the use of managements best
estimate of selling price for individual elements of an arrangement when vendor specific objective
evidence, vendor objective evidence, or third-party evidence is unavailable.
37
Additionally, it eliminates the residual method of revenue recognition in accounting for multiple
deliverable arrangements. The guidance is effective for fiscal years beginning on or after June 15,
2010 (the Companys fiscal 2012), but early adoption is permitted. The Company is currently
evaluating the impact that adoption of this pronouncement will have on the Companys Financial
Statements.
Revenue Arrangements with Software Elements: The pronouncement modifies the scope of the software
revenue recognition guidance to exclude tangible products that contain both software and
non-software components that function together to deliver the products essential functionality.
The pronouncement is effective for fiscal years beginning on or after June 15, 2010 (the Companys
fiscal 2012), but early adoption is permitted. This guidance must be adopted in the same period an
entity adopts the amended revenue arrangements with multiple deliverables guidance described above.
The Company is currently evaluating the impact that adoption of this pronouncement will have on the
Companys Financial Statements.
Variable Interest Entities and Transfers of Financial Assets and Extinguishments of Liabilities:
The pronouncement on transfers of financial assets and extinguishments of liabilities removes the
concept of a qualifying special-purpose entity and removes the exception from applying variable
interest entity accounting to qualifying special-purpose entities. The new guidance on variable
interest entities requires an entity to perform an ongoing analysis to determine whether the
entitys variable interest or interests give it a controlling financial interest in a variable
interest entity. The pronouncements are effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15,
2009. The Company will adopt the pronouncements for interim and annual reporting periods beginning
in the first quarter of fiscal 2011. The Company expects that adoption of this pronouncement will
not have an impact on the Companys financial statements.
ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
Interest Rate Sensitivity. Interest to be paid by us on our senior secured loan is at an interest
rate based, at our option, on either the LIBOR or the prime rate, plus an applicable margin. We
expect the base interest rate generally to be based on the published LIBOR rate, which is subject
to change on a periodic basis. Recently, interest rates have trended downwards in major global
financial markets, stabilizing at relatively low levels over the past few months. If these interest
rate trends were to reverse, this will result in increased interest expense as a result of higher
LIBOR rates. In addition, interest income received by us fluctuates based on prevailing market
interest rates.
Foreign Currency Exchange Risk. A significant portion of our sales and a portion of our costs are
denominated in Renminbi, the Chinese currency. At the same time, our senior secured bank loan
which we intend to service and repay primarily through cash flow from H3Cs PRC operations is
denominated in US dollars. In July 2005, China uncoupled the Renminbi from the U.S. dollar and let
it float in a narrow band against a basket of foreign currencies. The Renminbi could appreciate or
depreciate relative to the U.S. dollar. Any movement of the Renminbi may materially and adversely
affect our cash flows, revenues, operating results and financial position, and may make it more
difficult for us to service our U.S. dollar-denominated senior secured bank loan. More
specifically, if the Renminbi appreciates in value as compared with the U.S. dollar, our reported
revenues will derive a beneficial increase due to currency translation; and if the Renminbi
depreciates, our revenues will suffer due to such depreciation. This currency translation impacts
our expenses as well, but to a lesser degree. We believe a ten percent increase in exchange rates
would not have a material effect on our financial position or results of operations.
Outside of China, most of our sales are invoiced and collected in US dollars, while selling and
administrative expenses are incurred in local currency. A depreciation of the US dollar will result
in higher selling and administrative expenses outside of the United States, while an appreciation
of the US dollar will reduce the reported selling and administrative expenses. With the exception
of China, changes in currency valuations should not have a significant impact on our revenue or
margin. We believe that a sudden or significant change in foreign exchange rates would not have a
material impact on future net income or cash flows other than with respect to the Chinese Renminbi.
38
ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Our management carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our
Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of our disclosure
controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this Form 10-Q pursuant to Exchange
Act Rule 13a-15(b). Based upon that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief
Financial Officer concluded that, as of February 26, 2010, our disclosure controls and procedures
were effective.
The term disclosure controls and procedures, as defined under the Exchange Act, means controls
and other procedures of an issuer that are designed to ensure that information required to be
disclosed by the issuer in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded,
processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange
Commissions rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation,
controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by an issuer
in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to
the issuers management, including its principal executive and principal financial officers, or
persons performing similar functions, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required
disclosure.
There have been no changes in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during
the three months ended February 26, 2010 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to
materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
The information set forth in Note 15 to the Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements is incorporated by reference herein.
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS
Risk factors may affect our future business and results. The matters discussed below could cause
our future business or results to differ materially from past business or results or those
described in forward-looking statements and could have a material adverse effect on our business,
financial condition, results of operations, prospects and/or stock price.
Risk Related to Proposed Acquisition by Hewlett-Packard Company
Our proposed acquisition by Hewlett-Packard Company creates unique risks in the time leading up to
closing, and there are also risks relating to completing the conditions to closing; if the
transaction is delayed or does not close, it could result in adverse effects on our business and
stock price.
On November 11, 2009, we announced an agreement to be acquired by Hewlett-Packard Company pursuant
to a merger agreement executed by the parties. We cannot assure you that the proposed acquisition
will be consummated. In addition, the announcement and pendency of the merger could adversely
affect and cause disruptions in our business, including, without limitation, affecting our
relationships with our customers, partners, vendors and employees.
39
The closing of the Merger is subject to the satisfaction or waiver of specified closing conditions,
including, without limitation, (i) the adoption of the Merger Agreement by 3Coms stockholders and
(ii) the expiration or termination of waiting periods, and obtaining of requisite approvals or
clearances, under specified antitrust and competition laws (including, without limitation, in
China, the European Union and the United States, among others). On December 22, 2009, the relevant
U.S. antitrust authorities granted early termination of the waiting period under the U.S.
Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976, as amended. On February 12, 2010, the
European Commission cleared the Merger under the EU Merger Regulation. In addition, on January 26,
2010, 3Coms stockholders adopted the Merger Agreement at a special meeting of stockholders. The
closing is also subject to the other closing conditions described in the merger agreement. We can
neither guarantee that these closing conditions will be satisfied nor assure you that we will
receive the required approvals. Accordingly, we cannot assure you that the proposed acquisition
will be completed. In the event that the proposed acquisition is not completed or is delayed:
|
|
|
managements and our employees attention may be diverted from our day-to-day
business because matters related to the proposed acquisition may require substantial
commitments of their time and resources; |
|
|
|
|
we may lose key employees; |
|
|
|
|
our relationships with customers, partners and vendors may be substantially disrupted
as a result of uncertainties with regard to our business and prospects; |
|
|
|
|
certain costs related to the proposed acquisition, such as legal and accounting fees
and reimbursement of certain expenses, are payable by us whether or not the proposed
acquisition is completed; |
|
|
|
|
under certain circumstances, if the proposed acquisition is not completed we may be
required to pay a termination (break-up) fee of up to $99 million; and |
|
|
|
|
the market price of shares of our common stock may decline to the extent that the
current market price of those shares reflects a market assumption that the proposed
acquisition will be completed. |
The merger agreement generally requires us to operate our business in the ordinary course pending
consummation of the proposed acquisition, and it restricts us, without Hewlett-Packard Companys
prior written consent, from taking certain specified actions until the acquisition is complete or
the agreement is terminated, including, without limitation, not exceeding a certain amount in
capital expenditures, not making dividends or acquisitions, not entering into certain types of
contracts and other matters. These restrictions may prevent us from pursuing attractive business
opportunities that may arise prior to the completion of the merger with Hewlett-Packard Company
that could be favorable to us and our stockholders. Further, we risk losing key employees due to
the uncertainty posed by the pending transaction. Efforts are needed by our employees to ensure
that during the pendency of the proposed transaction we continue to execute on our business plan
and strategy, including research and development work on new products; sales and marketing efforts
relating to current marketed products, as well as the launch of new products; and management of
relationships with important stakeholders to avoid disruption with those companies and persons,
including our customers, partners and vendors.
Since the announcement of the proposed acquisition, a number of putative class action lawsuits have
been filed in relation to the acquisition See Legal Proceedings in Part II, Item 1 in this Form
10-Q for a description of pending litigation regarding the acquisition. We also could be subject to
additional litigation related to the proposed acquisition whether or not it is consummated. While
we currently believe all such litigation is without merit and will not succeed, these matters
create additional uncertainty relating to the proposed transaction and defending the matters is
costly and distracting to management.
Any of these events could have a material negative impact on our results of operations and
financial condition and could adversely affect the price of our common stock.
40
Risk Related to Global Economic Conditions
If the global economic recovery continues to be slow, or if some or all of the regions in which we
operate experience a return to recessionary economic conditions, our results may suffer.
The business conditions in which we operate are subject to rapid and unpredictable change due to
the recent global economic slowdown and the current nascent and slow economic recovery. Many of the
worlds economies are just emerging from a severe recession experienced over the last several
years. Persistently tight credit conditions have made it harder for businesses to access needed
capital. These factors have contributed to significant slowdowns in the technology industry in
general over the last several years, and in many of the specific markets and geographies in which
we operate, resulting in:
|
|
|
reduced demand for our products in many regions as a result of constraints on information
technology-related capital spending by our customers; |
|
|
|
|
risk of excess and obsolete inventories; |
|
|
|
|
longer sales cycles; |
|
|
|
|
delayed and/or cancelled purchases due to factors such as tight credit conditions and
unfavorable local currency translation (noting that we denominate sales in USD in most
locations outside of China); and |
|
|
|
|
risk of longer cash cycles as customers take longer to pay us for products and services
and some customers deal with insolvency issues. |
Our business is heavily dependent on China, a country whose historic strong growth rates slowed
significantly over the last several years. While Chinas growth rates have recently stabilized, it
is unclear whether this stabilization will result in increased growth rates in the future. Outside
of China, economies generally appear to be experiencing a slow recovery from the global recession,
although the increase in economic activity remains modest and it is not clear whether economic
conditions in any particular jurisdiction will continue to improve or will experience a return to
recessionary conditions. The slow recovery is evidenced by customers exercising restraint when
considering IT-related capital spending.
The above factors make it more challenging to predict our future performance. If global economic
and credit conditions in the major regions in which we operate, particularly in China, persist,
spread, or deteriorate further, if the recovery continues to be slow, or if we experience a return
to recessionary economic conditions, we may continue to experience a negative impact on our
business, operating results and financial condition.
Risks Related to Ability to Sustain and Increase Profitability and the Impact of our Secured
Indebtedness
We may not be able to sustain or increase our profitability in the future.
While we returned to profitability in our 2009 fiscal year (after numerous years of significant net
losses) and continue to be profitable, we cannot assure you we will be able to sustain this
profitability or, if sustained, increase our profitability. We face a number of challenges that
have affected our operating results during the current and past several fiscal years. Specifically,
we have experienced, and may continue to experience, the following:
|
|
|
declining sales in certain regions; |
|
|
|
|
operating expenses that, as a percentage of sales, have exceeded our desired financial
model; |
|
|
|
|
significant senior leadership and other management changes; |
|
|
|
|
significant non-cash accounting charges; |
|
|
|
|
increased sales and marketing expense as part of a strategy to help grow our market
share; and |
|
|
|
|
disruptions and expenses resulting from our workforce reductions and employee attrition. |
41
To sustain and increase our profitability, we must maintain or increase our sales, and if we cannot
do that, we may need to further reduce costs. As we have implemented significant cost reduction
programs over the last several years, it may be difficult to make significant further cost
reductions without in turn impacting our sales. In addition, we may choose to reinvest some or all
of any realized cost savings in future growth opportunities. Any of these events or occurrences
will likely cause our expense levels to continue to be at levels above our desired model.
If we cannot overcome these challenges, reduce our expenses and/or increase our revenue, we may not
be able to sustain and increase our profitability.
Our indebtedness could adversely affect our financial condition and ability to grow our business.
We now have, and for the foreseeable future will continue to have, a significant amount of
indebtedness. As of February 26, 2010, our total debt balance was $112 million, of which $48
million is classified as a current liability.
While we currently have cash and cash equivalents in excess of our total borrowings, our
indebtedness could have significant negative consequences to us. For example, it could:
|
|
|
increase our vulnerability to general adverse economic and industry conditions; |
|
|
|
|
limit our ability to obtain additional financing; |
|
|
|
|
require the dedication of a substantial portion of our cash flow from operations to
satisfy debt obligations, reducing the availability of capital to finance operations and
growth; |
|
|
|
|
limit our flexibility in planning for, or reacting to, changes in our business and our
industry; and |
|
|
|
|
place us at a competitive disadvantage relative to our competitors with less debt. |
Covenants in the agreements governing our senior secured loan materially restrict our H3C
subsidiarys operations based in China, including H3Cs ability to incur debt, pay dividends, make
certain investments and payments, make acquisitions of other businesses and encumber or dispose of
assets. In addition, in the event H3Cs financial results do not meet our plans, the failure to
comply with the financial covenants contained in the loan agreements could lead to a default. An
event of default, if not cured or waived, could have a material adverse effect on us because the
lenders will be able to accelerate all outstanding amounts under the loan or foreclose on the
collateral (which consists primarily of our H3C business). In addition, if the LIBOR rate
increases, our interest obligations, which are based on LIBOR, will increase. Our interest
obligations are also dependent on our H3C group leverage ratio, as defined under the credit
agreement; if the ratio increases above specified levels (i.e., because H3C financial results
decrease), our interest obligations will increase. Any of these actions could result in a material
adverse effect on our business and financial condition.
In recent years, we have generated most of our positive cash flow from operations from our China
business, and our operations outside of China have been mostly cash flow negative. The credit
agreement limits our ability to dividend cash outside of China (i.e., outside of the H3C group) and
requires that a substantial portion of H3Cs cash flow be used to pay down debt obligations.
Accordingly, we cannot use cash generated in China to fund our operations outside of China (except
under certain conditions we are permitted to dividend outside of China a portion of H3Cs annual
excess cash flow (as defined by the credit agreement)). Because available and permitted dividends
under the credit agreement are determined by H3Cs consolidated excess cash flow and leverage ratio
(as defined under the Credit Agreement), if H3Cs results decrease, the permitted dividends, if
any, we can make to our operations outside of China will likely decrease. If we do not generate or
maintain appropriate cash on hand on a worldwide basis to finance operations and make investments
where needed or desired, our business results and growth objectives may suffer; in particular, our
cash balances outside of China could fall below our desired levels, particularly if we do not meet
the conditions necessary to dividend cash up from China.
42
Risks Related to China-based Sales region and Dependence Thereon
We are significantly dependent on our China-based segment; if it is not successful we will likely
experience a material adverse impact to our business, business prospects and operating results.
For the fiscal quarter ended February 26, 2010, our China-based sales region was profitable,
accounted for approximately 54 percent of our consolidated revenue and generated the majority of
our positive cash flow from operations. Our China-based sales region is subject to specific risks
relating to its ability to:
|
|
|
maintain a leading position in the networking equipment market in China; |
|
|
|
|
build profitable operations in other emerging markets throughout the world, but
particularly in the Asia Pacific region; |
|
|
|
|
offer new and innovative products and services to attract and retain a larger customer
base; |
|
|
|
|
increase awareness of the H3C brand and continue to develop customer loyalty; |
|
|
|
|
respond to rapidly changing competitive market conditions; |
|
|
|
|
respond to changes in the regulatory environment; |
|
|
|
|
manage risks associated with intellectual property rights; |
|
|
|
|
maintain effective control of costs and expenses; and |
|
|
|
|
attract, retain and motivate qualified personnel. |
In China, we face competition from domestic Chinese industry participants, and as a foreign-owned
business may not be as successful in selling to Chinese customers, particularly those in the public
sector, to the extent that such customers favor Chinese-owned competitors.
We expect that a significant portion of our sales will continue to be derived from our China-based
sales region for the foreseeable future. As a result, we are subject to economic, political, legal
and social developments in China and surrounding areas; we discuss risks related to the PRC in
further detail below. In addition, because we already have a significant percentage of the market
share in China for enterprise networking products, our opportunities to grow market share in China
are more limited than in the past. Our China-based sales region has experienced growth since its
inception in part due to the growth in Chinas technology industry, which may not be representative
of future growth or be sustainable. We cannot assure you that our China-based sales regions
historical financial results are indicative of its future operating results or future financial
performance, or that its profitability will be sustained or increased.
Given the significance of our China-based sales region to our financial results, if it is not
successful our business will likely be materially adversely affected.
If, as expected, Huawei Technologies, or Huawei, continues to significantly reduce its business
with us, our business results will be materially adversely affected if we cannot increase other
business to offset the decline.
We historically have and currently derive a material portion of our sales from Huawei, which
formerly held a significant investment in our H3C subsidiary. In the three months ended February
26, 2010, which includes results from our China-based sales regions December 31, 2009 quarter,
Huawei accounted for approximately 7 percent of the revenue for our China-based sales region and
approximately 4 percent of our consolidated revenue. Huaweis percentage of our China-based sales
regions revenues has been trending downward from 46 percent during the 3 months ended November 30,
2006, to the current level. This decrease has been accelerating. We expect Huawei to continue to
reduce its business with us and we believe that its purchases in absolute dollars will likely
continue to decrease significantly. Huawei does not have any minimum purchase requirements under
our existing OEM agreement, which expires in November 2010. We believe Huawei has begun to sell,
and likely will continue to sell, internally-developed networking equipment with respect to some of
the products it formerly purchased from us. We further believe Huawei also has access to other
networking equipment vendors that sell products comparable to our solutions. If and to the extent
any of these events occur and/or continue, it will likely have an adverse impact on our sales and
business performance. In order to minimize any adverse impact on our results from any decreased
sales to Huawei, we need to successfully execute on our business strategies including, without
limitation,
43
increasing direct touch sales of networking products inside and outside of China. If we are not
successful in these efforts, the risks described above, including adverse impacts to our financial
results, may be heightened.
Risk Related to Core Business Strategy
If we cannot increase our enterprise account business, in particular outside of China, we likely
will not reach our growth and profitability goals.
We strive to be increasingly successful in direct-touch sales for larger enterprise and government
accounts in all geographic regions. In China we are already an established provider of networking
equipment to enterprise-class and government customers under the H3C brand. We must continue to
execute in China. Our strategy also involves leveraging China as a principal market for
enterprise-class solutions, developing and introducing new products in China and then marketing and
selling them to other regions in the global marketplace.
To increase market share outside of China and develop our global enterprise brand we must be
increasingly successful in capturing larger enterprise and government opportunities (in addition to
our small-and-medium size business). Our ability to achieve such success is subject to numerous
risks and challenges, including those described below. Increasing our enterprise business will
likely require a greater investment in sales and marketing, as well as the provision and
maintenance of a global service organization that can respond to enterprise customers. The sales
cycle is generally longer for enterprise accounts (possibly yielding uneven and unpredictable
revenue from quarter to quarter) when compared to our small-and-medium-size business. We also
expect intense competition from larger industry participants, many of whom possess a significantly
larger market share and installed base than us. We will also need to be perceived by decision
making officers of large enterprises as committed for the long-term to the enterprise networking
business. We will also need to compete favorably on the offering of features and functionality that
these enterprise customers demand; if our competitors are more effective at such efforts our
ability to convert pipeline opportunities into sales will suffer. We seek to develop and expand the
global channel for our H3C product portfolio, in particular outside of China. Our push to further
expand sales to large enterprises may be disruptive in a variety of ways, including the risk our
increased direct-touch sales efforts are perceived by existing channel partners as competitive or
viewed by market participants as indicating a diminished focus on the small-and-medium business
market. We will need to maintain an infrastructure that permits us to effectively document,
process, manage, ship and account for these larger transactions. To gain market share, our global
branding strategy (H3C for enterprise, 3Com for small-and-medium business and TippingPoint for
security solutions) must be positively received by our customers, potential customers and channel
partners. This strategy is relatively new.
If we fail to manage a transition outside of China to a business model focused more heavily on
enterprise-class business, we will not achieve our business goals and our business results may
suffer.
Our strategy also involves select integration activities between different parts of our business.
Our H3C acquisition significantly increased the size, scope and complexity of 3Com, and we have
since taken actions designed to maximize the potential of our integrated company. Overall, we seek
to address the different cultures, languages and business processes of the two companies, and to
leverage H3C and its brand on a global basis. Integration efforts may include streamlined research
and development/engineering functions; coordinated product line management efforts; integrated
sales and marketing, general and administrative, IT and supply chain functions; new branding
strategies; and continued exploration of further initiatives to reduce expenses and unify the
companies. We are also more fully integrating our TippingPoint business, including adding
additional security features to our networking products. If we are not successful in executing the
integration strategies we choose to implement, our business may be harmed.
Risk Related to Personnel
Our success is dependent on continuing to hire and retain qualified managers and other personnel
and reducing senior management turnover; if we are not successful in attracting and retaining key
personnel, our business will suffer.
Competition for qualified employees is intense. If we fail to attract, hire, or retain qualified
personnel, our business will be harmed. We have historically experienced significant turnover in
our senior management team outside of China and we may continue to experience change at this level.
If we cannot retain qualified senior managers, and provide stability in the senior management team
to enable them to work together for an extended period of time, our business may not succeed.
44
The senior management team at our China-based sales segment has been highly effective. We need to
continue to incentivize and retain China-based management. We cannot be sure we will be successful
in these efforts. If we are not successful, our China-based sales region may suffer, which, in
turn, will have a material adverse impact on our consolidated business. Many of these senior
managers, and other key China-based employees, originally worked for Huawei prior to the inception
of our former joint venture with Huawei in China. Subject to non-competition agreements with us (if
applicable), these employees could return to work for Huawei at any time. Huawei is not subject to
any non-solicitation obligations with respect to us. Further, former Huawei employees employed by
us may retain financial interests in Huawei.
Risks Related to Competition
Intense competition in the market for networking solutions and new or developing product markets
could prevent us from increasing revenue and profitability.
The market for networking solutions is intensely competitive. In particular, Cisco Systems, Inc.,
or Cisco, maintains a significant leadership position in this market and many of its products
compete directly with our products and solutions. Ciscos substantial resources and market
leadership have enabled it to compete aggressively. Purchasers of networking solutions may choose
Cisco because of its broader product line, extensive set of features and functionality, larger
installed base, extensive channel partner programs, substantial services organization, greater
financial strength and strong reputation in the networking market. In addition, Cisco may have
developed, or could in the future develop, new technologies that directly compete with our products
or render our products obsolete. We cannot assure you we will be able to compete successfully
against Cisco.
We also compete with several other significant companies in the networking industry. Some of our
current and potential competitors have greater market leverage, longer operating histories, greater
financial, technical, sales, marketing and other resources, stronger name recognition, broader
partnerships with systems integrators and enterprise channel partners and larger installed customer
bases. Additionally, we may face competition from new or previously unknown companies that may
offer new competitive networking solutions and/or alternative technologies that displace the need
for some of our products or services. We also face the possibility that consolidation in our
industry could result in two or more of our competitors becoming a single competitor with greater
resources, broader sales coverage and superior products.
As we focus on new market opportunities for example, IP storage and IP video surveillance and
other advanced technologies and emerging technologies we will increasingly compete with large
telecommunications equipment suppliers as well as startup companies. We cannot assure you we will
compete favorably against these competitors for these market opportunities.
In order to remain competitive, we must, among other things, invest significant resources in
developing new products with superior performance at lower prices than our competitors, enhance our
current products and maintain customer satisfaction. If we fail to do these things, our products
may not compete favorably with those of our competitors and our revenue and profitability could
suffer.
Our competition with Huawei could have a material adverse effect on our sales and our results of
operations, particularly if Huawei increases its level of competition against us.
As Huawei expands its operations, offerings and markets, there could be increasing instances where
we compete directly with Huawei in the enterprise networking market. As a significant customer of
our China-based segment, Huawei has had, and continues to have, access to H3C products for resale.
This access enhances Huaweis current ability to compete directly with us both in China and in the
rest of the world. We risk competition from enterprise products that Huawei internally develops and
markets or sources from our equipment manufacturer competitors. Huawei has historically sold our
networking products to carrier customers (who purchase for themselves and their own enterprise
customers). We believe Huawei sells internally developed products to meet carrier demand for these
products and it is possible Huawei may also use these products to market and sell more directly to
enterprise customers in the future. Huawei is not bound by any contractual non-competition
obligations with us. We also sell carrier class products in China through our direct-touch sales
force in competition with Huawei and other carrier market equipment providers.
Huawei maintains a strong presence within China and the Asia Pacific region and possesses
significant competitive resources, including vast engineering talent and ownership of the assets of
Harbour Networks, a China-based competitor that possesses enterprise networking products and
technology. We cannot predict the extent to which Huawei will compete with us. If Huawei increases
its competition with us, or if we do not compete favorably with Huawei, it is likely that our
business results, particularly in the Asia Pacific region and specifically in China, will be
materially and negatively affected.
45
Risks Related to Business and Technology Strategy
Our industry is characterized by a short product life cycle, and we may not be successful at
identifying and responding to new and emerging market, technology and product opportunities, or at
responding quickly enough to technologies or markets that are in decline.
Our success depends on our ability to:
|
|
|
identify new market and product opportunities; |
|
|
|
|
predict which technologies and markets will see declining demand; |
|
|
|
|
develop and introduce new products and solutions (and new features and
functionality for existing products and solutions) in a timely manner; |
|
|
|
|
gain market acceptance of new products and solutions; and |
|
|
|
|
rapidly and efficiently transition our customers from older to newer enterprise
networking technologies. |
Accordingly, our business will likely suffer if:
|
|
|
there is a delay in introducing new products, features or functionality; |
|
|
|
|
we lose key channel partners; |
|
|
|
|
our products do not satisfy customers in terms of features, functionality or
quality; or |
|
|
|
|
our products cost more to produce than we expect. |
The enterprise networking industry in which we compete is characterized by rapid changes in
technology and customer requirements and evolving industry standards. For example, our success
depends on the convergence of technologies (such as voice, video and data) and the timely adoption
and market acceptance of industry standards. Slow market acceptance of new technologies, products,
or industry standards could adversely affect our sales or overall results of operations. In
addition, if our technology is not included in an industry standard on a timely basis or if we fail
to achieve timely certification of compliance to industry standards for our products, our sales of
such products or our overall results of operations could be adversely affected.
We rely on our research and development base in Beijing, China to develop and design most of our
new technologies, products and solutions. These engineers develop products for all of the global
markets in which we participate and must design solutions for the developed world as well as for
China and other emerging markets. Developed markets may have different products features and
customer requirements than emerging markets, and we must timely develop product solutions that
satisfy our customers on a worldwide basis. If we are not successful at these efforts, our business
will suffer.
Risks Related to Operations and Distribution Channels
If we are not successful at partnering with system integrators and expanding our base of enterprise
channel partners, reaching our growth and profitability goals will be more challenging and we will
likely not reach our full potential.
A significant portion of enterprise networking business is conducted through and with the
assistance of system integrators, or SIs, and enterprise channel partners, including value-added
resellers (VARs). The industry leaders with whom we compete as a general matter maintain
significant relationships with at least one SI and in some cases have stronger enterprise channels.
We seek to develop and expand our global channel for our H3C product portfolio, in particular
outside of China. If we are not successful at increasing the number of partnerships we maintain
with these types of organizations or if the strategic relationships we enter into are not effective
or successful, it will be more difficult to reach our goals, and we likely will not reach our full
potential to be a leading, truly global enterprise networking company.
46
A significant portion of our sales is derived from a small number of distributors. If any of these
channel partners reduces its business with us, our business could be adversely affected.
We distribute many of our products through two-tier distribution channels that include distributors
and VARs. In some instances, we also use a system integrator. A significant portion of our sales is
concentrated among a few distributors; our two largest distributors accounted for a combined 14
percent of our consolidated revenue for the three months ended February 26, 2010. If either of
these distributors reduces its business with us, our sales and overall results of operations could
be adversely affected.
We work closely with our distributors to monitor channel inventory levels and ensure that
appropriate levels of products are available to resellers and end users. We maintain target ranges
for channel inventory levels for supply on hand at our distributors. Partners with a below-average
inventory level may incur stock outs that would adversely impact our sales. Our distribution
agreements typically provide that our distributors may cancel their orders on short notice with
little or no penalty. If our channel partners reduce their levels of inventory of our products, our
sales would be negatively impacted during the period of change.
We may be unable to manage our supply chain successfully, which would adversely impact our sales,
gross margin and profitability.
Our supply chain function involves the management of numerous external suppliers, vendors and
contract manufacturers. We source component parts for our products from numerous vendors and
outsource principally all of our manufacturing, a significant portion of our logistics and
fulfillment functions and a portion of our service and repair functions. If we cannot adequately
manage our supply chain, our business results and financial condition will likely suffer. Our
ability to manage our supply chain successfully is subject to the following risks, among others:
|
|
|
our ability to accurately forecast demand for our products and services; |
|
|
|
|
our reliance on, and long-term arrangements with, third-party manufacturers (which places
much of the supply chain process out of our direct control, heightens the need for accurate
forecasting and reduces our ability to transition quickly to alternative supply chain
strategies); and |
|
|
|
|
our ability to minimize disruptions to our logistics and effectively manage disruptions
that do occur. |
We cannot be certain that in the future our suppliers will be able or willing to meet our demand
for components in a timely and cost-effective manner. There has been a trend toward consolidation
of vendors of electronic components. Our reliance on a smaller number of vendors and the inability
to quickly switch vendors increases the risk of logistics disruptions, unfavorable price
fluctuations or disruptions in supply. From time-to-time, supplies of certain key components have
become tighter. We risk adverse impact to our gross margin to the extent there is a resulting
increase in component costs and time necessary to obtain these components.
If overall demand for our products or the mix of demand for our products is significantly different
from our expectations, we may face inadequate or excess component supply or inadequate (such as, if
the current slow economic recovery accelerates faster than our ability to fill orders) or excess
manufacturing capacity. This would result in orders for products that could not be manufactured in
a timely manner, or a buildup of inventory that could not easily be sold. Either of these
situations could adversely affect our market share, sales and results of operations or financial
position.
If we fail to adequately evolve our financial and managerial control and reporting systems and
processes, our ability to manage and grow our business may be negatively affected.
Our ability to successfully offer our products and services and implement our business plan in a
rapidly evolving market depends in part upon effective planning and management processes and
systems. Our company has undergone substantial change in the last several years, including
strategic changes, operational changes, personnel changes and structural changes. We have
historically had significant turnover in the executive management team and other parts of our
employee population, acquired H3C (which has experienced considerable growth over a short period of
time and now represents more than half of our sales) and implemented substantial downsizing in our
businesses and infrastructure outside of China. These changes have increased our challenges and we
will need to continue to improve, integrate and upgrade our financial and managerial control and
our reporting systems and procedures in order to manage our business effectively, analyze and make
sound business decisions and improve efficiencies. If we fail to implement improved systems and
processes, our ability to manage our business and results of operations could be adversely
affected.
47
Risks Related to our Operations in the Peoples Republic of China
Chinas legal and regulatory regime and changing political and economic environment may impact our
business in China.
As a result of the historic reforms of the past several decades, multiple government bodies are
involved in regulating and administrating affairs in the technology industry in China. These
government agencies have broad discretion and authority over various aspects of the networking,
telecommunications and information technology industry in China; accordingly their decisions may
impact our ability to do business in China. Any of the following changes in Chinas political and
economic conditions, laws, regulations and governmental policies could have a substantial impact on
our business:
|
|
|
the promulgation of new laws and regulations and the interpretation of those laws and
regulations; |
|
|
|
|
enforcement and application of rules and regulations by the Chinese government
authorities and or court system; |
|
|
|
|
the introduction of measures to control growth or inflation or stimulate growth; |
|
|
|
|
any actions that limit our ability to develop, manufacture, import or sell our products
in China, or export our products outside of China, or to finance and operate our business in
China; or |
|
|
|
|
laws, rules or regulations that negatively impact our ability to pay dividends from China
to outside of China, or impose restrictions (including conditions or timing restrictions) or
additional taxes on such dividends. |
Due to our dependence on China, if China were to experience a broad and prolonged economic slowdown
or period of political or social unrest, our results of operations would likely suffer. The Chinese
government has also from time-to-time implemented certain measures to control the pace of economic
growth or to stimulate the economy. Measures to stimulate growth may not work and measures to
control growth could cause a decrease in the level of economic activity in China, which in turn
could adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.
Uncertainties with respect to the Chinese legal and regulatory system may adversely affect us.
We conduct our business in China primarily through H3C Technologies Co., Limited, a Hong Kong
entity which in turn owns several Chinese entities. These entities are generally subject to laws
and regulations applicable to foreign investment in China. In addition, there are uncertainties
regarding the interpretation and enforcement of laws, rules, regulations and policies in China.
Because many laws and regulations are relatively new and the Chinese legal and regulatory system is
still evolving, the interpretations of many laws, regulations and rules are not always uniform and
local, provincial or central authorities may exercise significant discretion in applying them.
Moreover, the interpretation of statutes and regulations may be subject to government policies
reflecting domestic political changes. Finally, enforcement of existing laws or contracts based on
existing law may be uncertain, and it may be difficult to obtain swift and equitable enforcement,
or to obtain enforcement of a judgment by a court of another jurisdiction. Any litigation in China
may be protracted and result in substantial costs and diversion of resources and managements
attention. Administrative processes and operational decisions are subject to the risks and
uncertainties described above, which could result in delays and changed positions.
If PRC tax benefits available to us are reduced or repealed, our profitability or cash flow could
suffer.
New tax regulations came into effect on January 1, 2008 establishing the corporate income tax rate
of 25 percent (phased in over time for certain companies) for companies subject to income tax in
China. The new law also provided for a reduced tax rate of 15 percent for companies which qualify as new
and high technology enterprises. Our main operating subsidiary in China, Hangzhou H3C
Technologies Co., Ltd, has qualified for this reduced tax rate and accordingly, we expect that our
long-term tax rate in China will be 15 percent.
If the tax benefits we currently enjoy in China are withdrawn or reduced, or if new taxes are
introduced which have not applied to us previously, there would likely be a resulting increase to
our statutory tax rate in the PRC. Increases to the tax rates in the PRC, where we are profitable,
could adversely affect our results of operations and cash flow.
48
If the Chinese VAT Authorities discontinue, reduce, or defer the VAT Software Subsidy Program, our
results will likely be adversely affected.
We benefit from a program run by the Chinese authorities which effectively provides us with
nontaxable subsidy payments based on a percentage of the value-added tax, or VAT, collected by H3C
on the sales of our software. We have recorded substantial income from this program since
inception. The VAT subsidy payments are recorded in other income on a cash basis when actually
received from the government. The timing of the receipt of payments is subject to the discretion of
the Chinese tax authorities who must calculate and approve each application for these subsidies.
The program ends on December 31, 2010, is subject to the complete discretion of the Chinese tax
authorities and may be discontinued, reduced, or deferred at any time. If any of these events
occur, our results of operations will likely be adversely affected.
H3C is subject to restrictions on paying dividends and making other payments to us.
Chinese regulations currently permit payment of dividends only out of accumulated profits, as
determined in accordance with Chinese accounting standards and regulations. Our principal operating
entity in China is required to set aside a portion of its after-tax profits currently 10 percent
up to 50 percent of registered capital according to Chinese regulations, to fund certain
reserves. The Chinese government also imposes controls on the conversion of Renminbi into foreign
currencies and the remittance of currencies out of China. We may experience difficulties in
completing the administrative procedures necessary to obtain and remit foreign currency. These
restrictions may in the future limit our ability to receive dividends or repatriate funds from
China or impact the timing of such payments. In addition, as discussed elsewhere in this Risk
Factors section, the credit agreement governing our senior secured loan also imposes significant
restrictions on our ability to pay dividends or make other payments from China to our other
segments. Because available and permitted dividends under the credit agreement are determined by
H3Cs consolidated excess cash flow and leverage ratio (as defined under the credit agreement), if
H3Cs results decrease, the permitted dividends, if any, will likely decrease. While we are in
default, or event of default, under the credit agreement we may not make permitted dividend
payments. Finally, under a new PRC tax law all distributions of earnings realized from 2008 onwards
from our PRC subsidiaries to our subsidiary in Hong Kong will be subject to a withholding tax at a
rate of 5 percent. Our main PRC subsidiary generates the cash used to pay principal and interest on
our H3C loan. Accordingly, we must earn proportionately higher profits in the PRC to service
principal and interest on our loan, or be forced to fund any deficiencies from cash generated from
other geographies. In sum, if we do not generate or maintain appropriate cash on hand on a
worldwide basis to finance operations and make investments where needed or desired, our business
results and growth objectives may suffer; in particular, our cash balances outside of China could
fall below our desired levels.
We are subject to risks relating to currency rate fluctuations and exchange controls and we do not
hedge this risk in China.
Approximately 49 percent of our sales and a portion of our costs are denominated in Renminbi, the
Chinese currency. At the same time, our senior secured bank loan which we intend to service and
repay primarily through cash flow from our China-based operations is denominated in U.S.
dollars. In July 2005, China uncoupled the Renminbi from the U.S. dollar and let it float in a
narrow band against a basket of foreign currencies. The Renminbi could appreciate or depreciate
relative to the U.S. dollar. Any movement of the Renminbi may materially and adversely affect our
cash flows, revenues, operating results and financial position, and may make it more difficult for
us to service our U.S. dollar-denominated senior secured bank loan. More specifically, if the
Renminbi appreciates in value as compared with the U.S. dollar, our reported revenues will derive a
beneficial increase due to currency translation; and if the Renminbi depreciates, our revenues will
suffer due to such depreciation. This currency translation impacts our expenses as well, but to a
lesser degree. In some of our historical periods, we have benefited from the currency translation
of Renminbi, but our results may in the future be harmed by it.
Our sales around the world are generally denominated in Renminbi (in China) and in US Dollars (in
the rest of the world). We use those two currencies to price our products and generally do not
accept local currencies as payment for product. When we sell our products in countries outside of
China and the U.S. to customers in countries whose currencies have been devalued against the
Renminbi or the U.S. Dollar, the currency fluctuation causes the cost of our products to these
customers to be higher. We generally do not provide currency exchange risk protection to our
customers. For these reasons, when the Renminbi or U.S. Dollar is stronger against local
currencies, we may experience delayed or cancelled purchases or general business softness in the
relevant region.
We do not currently hedge the currency risk in China through foreign exchange forward contracts or
otherwise and China employs currency controls restricting Renminbi conversion, limiting our ability
to engage in currency hedging activities in China. Various foreign exchange controls are applicable
to us in China, and such restrictions may in the future make it difficult for H3C or us to
repatriate earnings, which could have an adverse effect on our cash flows and financial position.
49
Risks Related to Intellectual Property
If our products contain undetected software or hardware errors, we could incur significant
unexpected expenses and could lose sales.
High technology products sometimes contain undetected software or hardware errors when new products
or new versions or updates of existing products are released to the marketplace. We cannot assure
you our testing programs will be adequate to detect all defects. Undetected errors could result in
customer dissatisfaction, reduced sales opportunities, higher than expected warranty and service
costs and expenses and the recording of an accrual for related anticipated expenses. From time to
time, such errors or component failures could be found in new or existing products after the
commencement of commercial shipments. These problems may have a material adverse effect on our
business by causing us to incur significant warranty and repair costs, diverting the attention of
our engineering personnel from new product development efforts, delaying the recognition of revenue
and causing significant customer relations problems. Further, if products are not accepted by
customers due to such defects, and such returns exceed the amount we accrued for defect returns
based on our historical experience, our operating results would be adversely affected.
Our products must successfully interoperate with products from other vendors. As a result, when
problems occur in a network, it may be difficult to identify the sources of these problems. The
occurrence of hardware and software errors, whether or not caused by our products, could result in
the delay or loss of market acceptance of our products and any necessary revisions may cause us to
incur significant expenses. The occurrence of any such problems would likely have a material
adverse effect on our business, operating results and financial condition.
We may need to engage in complex and costly litigation in order to protect, maintain or enforce our
intellectual property rights; in some jurisdictions, such as China, our rights may not be as strong
as the rights we enjoy in the U.S.
Whether we are defending the assertion of intellectual property rights against us, or asserting our
intellectual property rights against others, intellectual property litigation can be complex,
costly, protracted, and highly disruptive to business operations because it may divert the
attention and energies of management and key technical personnel. Further, plaintiffs in
intellectual property cases often seek injunctive relief and the measures of damages in
intellectual property litigation are complex and often subjective and uncertain. In addition, such
litigation may subject us to counterclaims or other retaliatory actions that could increase its
costs, complexity, uncertainty and disruption to the business. Thus, the existence of this type of
litigation, or any adverse determinations related to such litigation, could subject us to
significant liabilities and costs. Any one of these factors could adversely affect our sales, gross
margin, results of operations, cash flow or financial position.
In addition, the legal systems of many foreign countries do not protect or honor intellectual
property rights to the same extent as the legal system of the United States. For example, in China,
the legal system in general, and the intellectual property regime in particular, are still in the
developmental stage. It may be very difficult, time-consuming and costly for us to attempt to
enforce our intellectual property rights in these jurisdictions.
We may not be able to defend ourselves successfully against claims that we are infringing the
intellectual property rights of others.
Many of our competitors, such as telecommunications, networking, and computer equipment
manufacturers, have large intellectual property portfolios, including patents that may cover
technologies that are relevant to our business. In addition, many smaller companies, universities,
patent holding companies and individual inventors have obtained or applied for patents in areas of
technology that may relate to our business. The industries in which we operate continue to be
aggressive in assertion, licensing and litigation of patents and other intellectual property
rights. It is very expensive to defend claims of patent infringement and we expect over time to
incur significant time and expense to defend these claims and defend, protect, preserve and
maintain our portfolio.
50
In the course of our business, we receive claims of infringement or otherwise become aware of
potentially relevant patents or other intellectual property rights held by other parties. We
evaluate the validity and applicability of these intellectual property rights, and determine in
each case whether to negotiate licenses or cross-licenses to incorporate or use the proprietary
technologies, protocols, or specifications in our products, and whether we have rights of
indemnification against our suppliers, strategic partners or licensors. If we are unable to obtain
and maintain licenses on favorable terms for intellectual property rights required for the
manufacture, sale, and use of our products, particularly those that must comply with industry
standard protocols and specifications to be commercially viable, our financial position or results
of operations could be adversely affected. In addition, if we are alleged to infringe the
intellectual property rights of others, we could be required to seek licenses from others or be
prevented from manufacturing or selling our products, which could cause disruptions to our
operations or the markets in which we compete. Finally, even if we have indemnification rights in
respect of such allegations of infringement from our suppliers, strategic partners or licensors, we
may not be able to recover our losses under those indemnity rights.
Many of our networking products use open source software, or OSS, licenses. Because OSS is often
compiled from multiple components developed by numerous independent parties and usually comes as
is and without indemnification, OSS is more vulnerable to third party intellectual property
infringement claims. Some of the more prominent OSS licenses, such as the GNU General Public
License, are the subject of litigation. It is possible that a court could hold such licenses to be
unenforceable or someone could assert a claim for proprietary rights in a program developed and
distributed under them. Any ruling by a court that these licenses are not enforceable or that open
source components of our product offerings may not be liberally copied, modified or distributed may
have the effect of preventing us from selling or developing all or a portion of our products. If
any of the foregoing occurred, it could cause a material adverse impact on our business.
Risks Related to the Trading Market
Fluctuations in our operating results and other factors may contribute to volatility in the market
price of our stock.
Historically, our stock price has experienced volatility. We expect that our stock price may
continue to experience volatility in the future due to a variety of potential factors such as:
|
|
|
announcements/expectations concerning the closing of our announced proposed acquisition
by Hewlett-Packard Company; |
|
|
|
|
fluctuations in our quarterly results of operations and cash flow; |
|
|
|
|
changes in our cash and equivalents and short term investment balances; |
|
|
|
|
our ability to execute on our strategic plan, including our core business strategy to
emphasize larger enterprise and government account business; |
|
|
|
|
general economic conditions on a global basis or in our key markets, such as China; |
|
|
|
|
variations between our actual financial results and published analysts expectations; and |
|
|
|
|
announcements by our competitors, and announcements by, sales to or loss of significant
customers. |
Over the past several years, the stock market has experienced significant price and volume
fluctuations that have affected the stock prices of many technology companies. These factors, as
well as general economic and political conditions or investors concerns regarding the credibility
of corporate financial statements and the accounting profession, may have a material adverse affect
on the market price of our stock in the future.
51
We may be required to record additional significant charges to earnings if our goodwill or
intangible assets become impaired.
Under accounting principles generally accepted in the United States, we review our amortizable
intangible assets for impairment when events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying
value may not be recoverable. Goodwill and other non-amortizing intangible assets are tested for
impairment at least annually. The carrying value of our goodwill or amortizable assets may not be
recoverable due to factors such as reduced estimates of future cash flows and slower growth rates
in our industry or in any of our business units. Estimates of future cash flows are based on an
updated long-term financial outlook of our operations. However, actual performance in the near-term
or long-term could be materially different from these forecasts, which could impact future
estimates. For example, if one of our business units does not meet its near-term and longer-term
forecasts, the goodwill assigned to the business unit could be impaired. Similarly, a significant
decline in our stock price and/or market capitalization may result in goodwill impairment for one
or more business units. We may be required to record a charge to earnings in our financial
statements during a period in which an impairment of our goodwill or amortizable intangible assets
is determined to exist, which may negatively impact our results of operations. For example, in the
three-month period ended May 30, 2008, we took a charge of $158.0 million relating to impairment of
the goodwill of our TippingPoint segment.
ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS
The following table summarizes repurchases of our stock, including shares surrendered to satisfy
tax withholding obligations, in the quarter ended February 28, 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Number of |
|
|
Approximate Dollar |
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares Purchased |
|
|
Value of Shares |
|
|
|
Number |
|
|
Average |
|
|
as Part of Publicly |
|
|
that May Yet Be |
|
|
|
of Shares |
|
|
Price Paid |
|
|
Announced Plans |
|
|
Purchased Under the |
|
Period |
|
Purchased |
|
|
per Share |
|
|
or Programs |
|
|
Plans or Programs |
|
November 28, 2009 through December
25, 2009 |
|
|
11,309 |
(1) |
|
$ |
7.40 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
December 26, 2009 through January 22, 2010 |
|
|
15,915 |
(1) |
|
|
7.59 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 23, 2010 through February 26, 2010 |
|
|
229,610 |
(1) |
|
|
7.46 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
256,834 |
|
|
$ |
7.47 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes shares surrendered to us to satisfy tax withholding obligations that arose upon the
vesting of restricted stock awards and units of 11,309 in December 2009, 15,915 in January
2010 and 229,610 in February 2010. |
ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
On January 26, 2010, 3Com, held a Special Meeting of Stockholders to vote on (1) a proposal
(Proposal I) to adopt the Agreement and Plan of Merger (the Merger Agreement), dated as of
November 11, 2009, by and among 3Com, Hewlett-Packard Company (HP), and Colorado Acquisition
Corporation, a wholly owned subsidiary of HP and (2) a proposal (Proposal II) to adjourn the
special meeting, if necessary or appropriate, to solicit additional proxies if there are
insufficient votes at the time of the special meeting to adopt the Merger Agreement. There were
396,006,355 shares eligible to vote as of the record date, December 9, 2009. A quorum was present
at the special meeting. Proposal I was approved by the stockholders with 77.21% of the outstanding
shares voting FOR adoption of the Merger Agreement. Proposal II was also approved, with 70.82%
voting FOR adjournment, if necessary. The voting results of the two proposals are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proposal I |
|
For |
|
|
Against |
|
|
Abstain |
|
A Adoption of Merger Agreement: |
|
|
305,769,093 |
|
|
|
5,361,511 |
|
|
|
243,226 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proposal II |
|
For |
|
|
Against |
|
|
Abstain |
|
Adjournment, if necessary: |
|
|
280,472,999 |
|
|
|
30,500,059 |
|
|
|
396,671 |
|
ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION
Not applicable.
52
ITEM 6. EXHIBITS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Incorporated by Reference |
|
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Filed |
|
Number |
|
|
Exhibit Description |
|
Form |
|
|
File No. |
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
Filing Date |
|
|
Herewith |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.1 |
|
|
Master Separation and Distribution |
|
|
10-Q |
|
|
|
002-92053 |
|
|
|
2.1 |
|
|
|
4/4/00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Agreement between the Registrant and Palm,
Inc. effective as of December 13, 1999 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.2 |
|
|
Indemnification and Insurance Matters |
|
|
10-Q |
|
|
|
002-92053 |
|
|
|
2.11 |
|
|
|
4/4/00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Agreement between the Registrant and Palm,
Inc. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.3 |
|
|
Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated |
|
|
8-K |
|
|
|
000-12867 |
|
|
|
2.1 |
|
|
|
12/16/04 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 13, 2004, by and among the
Registrant, Topaz Acquisition Corporation
and TippingPoint Technologies, Inc. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.4 |
|
|
Securities Purchase Agreement by and |
|
|
8-K/A |
|
|
|
000-12867 |
|
|
|
2.1 |
|
|
|
3/30/06 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
among 3Com Corporation, 3Com Technologies, Huawei
Technologies Co., Ltd. and Shenzen Huawei
Investment & Holding Co., Ltd., dated as of
October 28, 2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.5 |
|
|
Stock Purchase Agreement by and |
|
|
8-K |
|
|
|
000-12867 |
|
|
|
10.1 |
|
|
|
12/27/06 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
between Shenzhen Huawei Investment & Holding Co.,
Ltd. and 3Com Technologies, dated as of
December 22, 2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.6 |
|
|
Agreement and Plan of Merger by and |
|
|
8-K/A |
|
|
|
000-12867 |
|
|
|
2.1 |
|
|
|
9/28/07 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
among 3Com Corporation, Diamond II Holdings Inc.
and Diamond II Acquisition Corp., dated
September 28, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.7 |
|
|
Agreement and Plan of Merger by and |
|
|
8-K |
|
|
|
000-12867 |
|
|
|
2.1 |
|
|
|
11/12/09 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
among 3Com Corporation, Hewlett-Packard Company,
and Colorado Acquisition Corporation, dated
November 11, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.1 |
|
|
Amended and Restated Certificate of |
|
|
8-K |
|
|
|
000-12867 |
|
|
|
3.1 |
|
|
|
9/24/09 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Incorporation filed with the Secretary of
State of the State of Delaware on September
23, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.2 |
|
|
Registrants Bylaws, as amended on December 10, 2008 |
|
|
8-K |
|
|
|
000-12867 |
|
|
|
3.1 |
|
|
|
12/16/08 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.1 |
|
|
Third Amended and Restated Preferred |
|
|
8-A/A |
|
|
|
000-12867 |
|
|
|
4.1 |
|
|
|
11/27/02 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares Rights Agreement, dated as of November 4,
2002 (Rights Agreement) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.2 |
|
|
Amendment No. 1 to Rights Agreement, dated as of September 28, 2007 |
|
|
8-K/A |
|
|
|
000-12867 |
|
|
|
4.1 |
|
|
|
9/28/07 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.3 |
|
|
Amendment No. 2 to Rights Agreement, dated as of November 11, 2009 |
|
|
8-K |
|
|
|
000-12867 |
|
|
|
4.1 |
|
|
|
11/12/09 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.1 |
|
|
Certification of Principal Executive Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X |
|
|
31.2 |
|
|
Certification of Principal Financial Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X |
|
|
32.1 |
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X |
|
|
|
|
|
and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Indicates a management contract or compensatory plan |
53
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
3Com Corporation
(Registrant)
|
|
Dated: April 6, 2010 |
By: |
/s/ Jay Zager
|
|
|
|
Jay Zager |
|
|
|
Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial and
Accounting Officer and a duly authorized
officer of the registrant) |
|
54
EXHIBIT INDEX
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Incorporated by Reference |
|
Exhibit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Filed |
|
Number |
|
|
Exhibit Description |
|
Form |
|
|
File No. |
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
Filing Date |
|
|
Herewith |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.1 |
|
|
Master Separation and Distribution |
|
|
10-Q |
|
|
|
002-92053 |
|
|
|
2.1 |
|
|
|
4/4/00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Agreement between the Registrant and Palm,
Inc. effective as of December 13, 1999 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.2 |
|
|
Indemnification and Insurance Matters |
|
|
10-Q |
|
|
|
002-92053 |
|
|
|
2.11 |
|
|
|
4/4/00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Agreement between the Registrant and Palm,
Inc. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.3 |
|
|
Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated |
|
|
8-K |
|
|
|
000-12867 |
|
|
|
2.1 |
|
|
|
12/16/04 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 13, 2004, by and among the
Registrant, Topaz Acquisition Corporation
and TippingPoint Technologies, Inc. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.4 |
|
|
Securities Purchase Agreement by and |
|
|
8-K/A |
|
|
|
000-12867 |
|
|
|
2.1 |
|
|
|
3/30/06 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
among 3Com Corporation, 3Com Technologies, Huawei
Technologies Co., Ltd. and Shenzen Huawei
Investment & Holding Co., Ltd., dated as of
October 28, 2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.5 |
|
|
Stock Purchase Agreement by and |
|
|
8-K |
|
|
|
000-12867 |
|
|
|
10.1 |
|
|
|
12/27/06 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
between Shenzhen Huawei Investment & Holding Co.,
Ltd. and 3Com Technologies, dated as of
December 22, 2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.6 |
|
|
Agreement and Plan of Merger by and |
|
|
8-K/A |
|
|
|
000-12867 |
|
|
|
2.1 |
|
|
|
9/28/07 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
among 3Com Corporation, Diamond II Holdings Inc.
and Diamond II Acquisition Corp., dated
September 28, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.7 |
|
|
Agreement and Plan of Merger by and |
|
|
8-K |
|
|
|
000-12867 |
|
|
|
2.1 |
|
|
|
11/12/09 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
among 3Com Corporation, Hewlett-Packard Company,
and Colorado Acquisition Corporation, dated
November 11, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.1 |
|
|
Amended and Restated Certificate of |
|
|
8-K |
|
|
|
000-12867 |
|
|
|
3.1 |
|
|
|
9/24/09 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Incorporation filed with the Secretary of
State of the State of Delaware on September
23, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.2 |
|
|
Registrants Bylaws, as amended on December 10, 2008 |
|
|
8-K |
|
|
|
000-12867 |
|
|
|
3.1 |
|
|
|
12/16/08 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.1 |
|
|
Third Amended and Restated Preferred |
|
|
8-A/A |
|
|
|
000-12867 |
|
|
|
4.1 |
|
|
|
11/27/02 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares Rights Agreement, dated as of November 4,
2002 (Rights Agreement) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.2 |
|
|
Amendment No. 1 to Rights Agreement, dated as of September 28, 2007 |
|
|
8-K/A |
|
|
|
000-12867 |
|
|
|
4.1 |
|
|
|
9/28/07 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.3 |
|
|
Amendment No. 2 to Rights Agreement, dated as of November 11, 2009 |
|
|
8-K |
|
|
|
000-12867 |
|
|
|
4.1 |
|
|
|
11/12/09 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.1 |
|
|
Certification of Principal Executive Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X |
|
|
31.2 |
|
|
Certification of Principal Financial Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X |
|
|
32.1 |
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X |
|
|
|
|
|
and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Indicates a management contract or compensatory plan |
55