FORM S-11
As filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
June 8, 2005
Registration
No. 333-
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Form S-11
REGISTRATION STATEMENT
UNDER
THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933
New York Mortgage Trust, Inc.
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Governing
Instruments)
1301 Avenue of the Americas
New York, New York 10019
(212) 634-9400
(Address, Including Zip Code, and Telephone Number,
including
Area Code, of Registrants Principal Executive
Offices)
Steven B. Schnall
David A. Akre
Co-Chief Executive Officers
New York Mortgage Trust, Inc.
1301 Avenue of the Americas
New York, New York 10019
(212) 634-9400
(212) 655-6269 (Telecopy)
(Name, Address, Including Zip Code, and Telephone
Number, Including Area Code, of Agent for Service)
Copies to:
|
|
|
Daniel M. LeBey, Esq.
Hunton & Williams LLP
Riverfront Plaza, East Tower
951 E. Byrd Street
Richmond, Virginia 23219-4074
(804) 788-8200
(804) 788-8218 (Telecopy) |
|
Karen A. Dewis, Esq.
Thomas P. Conaghan, Esq.
McDermott, Will & Emery LLP
600 13th Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20005
(202) 756-8000
(202) 756-8087 (Telecopy) |
Approximate date of commencement of proposed sale to the
public: As soon as practicable after the effective date of
this Registration Statement.
If this Form is filed to register additional securities for an
offering pursuant to Rule 462(b) under the Securities Act,
check the following box and list the Securities Act registration
statement number of the earlier effective registration statement
for the same
offering. o
If this Form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to
Rule 462(c) under the Securities Act, check the following
box and list the Securities Act registration number of the
earlier effective registration statement for the same
offering. o
If this Form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to
Rule 462(d) under the Securities Act, check the following
box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of
the earlier effective registration statement for the same
offering. o
If delivery of the prospectus is expected to be made pursuant to
Rule 434, please check the following
box. o
CALCULATION OF REGISTRATION FEE
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proposed Maximum |
|
Proposed Maximum |
|
|
|
|
Amount to be |
|
Offering Price Per |
|
Aggregate Offering |
|
Amount of |
Title of Securities Being Registered |
|
Registered(1) |
|
Share(2) |
|
Price(3) |
|
Registration Fee(4) |
|
Common Stock, $0.01 par value per share
|
|
6,900,000 |
|
$9.75 |
|
$67,275,000 |
|
$7,920 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
Includes 900,000 shares of common stock that the
underwriters have an option to purchase to cover
over-allotments, if any. |
|
(2) |
Estimated solely for the purpose of calculating the registration
fee in accordance with Rule 457(c) under the Securities Act
of 1933, as amended, based on the average high and low prices
per share of the registrants common stock as reported on
the New York Stock Exchange on June 7, 2005. |
|
(3) |
Estimated solely for the purpose of determining the registration
fee in accordance with Rule 457(o) of the Securities Act of
1933. |
|
(4) |
Calculated in accordance with Rule 457(o) under the
Securities Act of 1933. |
The registrant hereby amends this registration statement on
such date or dates as may be necessary to delay its effective
date until the registrant shall file a further amendment which
specifically states that this registration statement shall
thereafter become effective in accordance with Section 8(a)
of the Securities Act of 1933 or until the registration
statement shall become effective on such dates as the
Commission, acting pursuant to said Section 8(a), may
determine.
The information in
this prospectus is not complete and may be changed. We may not
sell these securities until the registration statement filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission is effective. This
prospectus is not an offer to sell these securities and it is
not soliciting an offer to buy these securities in any state
where the offer or sale is not permitted.
|
SUBJECT TO COMPLETION, DATED
JUNE 8, 2005
PROSPECTUS
6,000,000 Shares of Common Stock
New York Mortgage Trust, Inc.
We are offering 6,000,000 shares of our common stock
through a syndicate of underwriters.
Our shares of common stock are traded on the New York Stock
Exchange under the symbol NTR. The last reported
sale price of our common stock on the New York Stock Exchange on
June 7, 2005 was $9.72 per share.
Neither the Securities and Exchange Commission nor any state
securities commission has approved or disapproved of these
securities or determined if this prospectus is truthful or
complete. Any representation to the contrary is a criminal
offense.
Investing in our common stock involves risks. See Risk
Factors beginning on page 9.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Per Share | |
|
Total | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Public offering price
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Underwriting discount
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Proceeds to us (before expenses)
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
We have granted the underwriters an option to purchase up to
900,000 additional shares of our common stock solely to cover
over-allotments, if any, at the public offering price, less the
underwriting discount, exercisable within 30 days from the
date of this prospectus.
We expect that the shares of common stock to be sold in this
offering will be delivered on or
about ,
2005.
|
|
Friedman Billings Ramsey |
JPMorgan |
The date of this prospectus
is ,
2005.
PROSPECTUS SUMMARY
This is only a summary and does not contain all of the
information that you should consider before investing in our
common stock. You should read the entire prospectus, including
Risk Factors and our financial statements and
related notes appearing elsewhere in this prospectus, before
deciding to invest in our common stock. In this prospectus,
unless the context suggests otherwise, references to our
company, we, us and
our mean New York Mortgage Trust, Inc., including
its subsidiaries. NYMC refers to our wholly owned taxable REIT
subsidiary, or TRS, and predecessor, The New York Mortgage
Company, LLC, and NYMF refers to our wholly-owned subsidiary,
New York Mortgage Funding, LLC. Unless indicated otherwise, the
information included in this prospectus assumes no exercise by
the underwriters of the over-allotment option to purchase up to
an additional 900,000 shares of common stock.
Overview
We are a fully integrated, self-advised residential mortgage
banking company, that originates, acquires and retains, sells
and securitizes mortgage assets. We intend to elect to be taxed
as a real estate investment trust, or REIT, under the Internal
Revenue Code commencing with our taxable year ended
December 31, 2004, upon filing our federal income tax
return for that year. We earn net interest income from
residential mortgage-backed securities and adjustable-rate
mortgage loans originated primarily through our wholly-owned
subsidiary, NYMC. Our residential mortgage investments are
comprised of adjustable rate loans, adjustable rate securities
and, to a lesser extent, floating rate collateralized mortgage
obligations. The adjustable rate loans and securities, which we
sometimes collectively refer to as ARM in this
prospectus, are comprised of traditional ARM securities and
loans, which have interest rates that reset in a year or less
and hybrid ARM securities and loans, which have a
fixed interest rate for an initial period of two to five years
before converting to ARMs whose rate will reset for their
remaining terms to maturity. ARM securities represent interests
in pools of whole ARM loans. The ARM securities are rated by at
least one of two nationally recognized statistical rating
agencies, Standard and Poors, Inc. or Moodys
Investors Service, Inc., collectively referred to in this
prospectus as the rating agencies, or issued and
guaranteed by Freddie Mac or Fannie Mae. We also invest in
mortgage-backed securities from time to time on a leveraged
basis. Our portfolio of mortgage loans and mortgage securities
was approximately $1.6 billion as of March 31, 2005.
We originated $1.85 billion of mortgage loans for the year
ended December 31, 2004 and $672.5 million for the
quarter ended March 31, 2005. Generally, we intend to
continue to sell the fixed-rate loans, and any ARM loans that do
not meet our investment criteria or portfolio requirements, that
we originate to third parties, and to retain in our portfolio
and finance a majority of the ARM loans that we originate. Our
portfolio loans are held at the REIT level or by NYMF, our
wholly-owned subsidiary. We rely on our own underwriting
criteria with respect to the mortgage loans we intend to retain
in our portfolio and rely on the underwriting criteria of the
institutions to which we sell our loans with respect to the
loans we intend to sell. We believe that proper underwriting for
the loans in our portfolio is critical to managing the credit
risk inherent in our portfolio. We believe that there is
substantial benefit to directly performing our own underwriting
of loans in our portfolio as compared to a purchased securities
portfolio. Our focus on underwriting has resulted in an
extremely stable portfolio where only one loan, as of
March 31, 2005, was more than 30 days delinquent.
We believe that our ability to use primarily mortgage loans that
we originate as the basis for our portfolio will enable us to
build a portfolio that generates a higher return than the
returns realized by mortgage investors that do not have their
own origination capabilities, because mortgage investors that do
not have their own origination capabilities must purchase their
mortgage loans from third parties at costs higher than
NYMCs cost of originating the mortgage loans that we
retain. While we continue to originate and build our portfolio
of ARM loans, we also intend to continue to purchase from third
parties on a leveraged basis residential mortgage-backed
securities issued and guaranteed by Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac or
rated investment grade by a rating agency. Over time, we expect
that these securities will be replaced by ARM loans that we
originate, although, from time to time, we may continue to
purchase securities from third parties. While we have not
established and do not expect to establish a limit on the amount
of leverage we may incur, our leverage ratio, defined as total
financing facilities less subordinated debentures outstanding
divided by total stockholders equity plus subordinated
debentures at March 31, 2005 was 12.1 times.
1
Historically, we have financed our mortgage originations on a
short-term basis through a variety of warehouse lines of credit
and repurchase facilities. We intend to continue to use
warehouse lines of credit and repurchase facilities to fund
NYMCs originations, and we will finance our portfolio of
mortgage loans with a combination of equity capital, repurchase
facilities and securitizations. From time to time as we
aggregate a large enough portfolio comprised mainly of retained
mortgage loans, we intend to securitize these mortgage loans. We
anticipate that the securitization transactions through which we
finance the adjustable-rate and hybrid mortgage loans that we
retain will be structured as financings for both tax and
financial accounting purposes. Therefore, we do not expect to
generate a gain or loss on sales from these activities, and,
following the securitizations, the loans will remain on our
consolidated balance sheet as assets with the securitization
debt listed as a liability. On February 25, 2005, we
completed our first loan securitization of approximately
$419 million of high-credit quality, first-lien, ARM loans
through New York Mortgage Trust 2005-1.
We intend to elect to be taxed as a REIT under the Internal
Revenue Code. As a REIT, we generally will not be subject to
federal income tax on the REIT taxable income that we distribute
to our stockholders, but the taxable income generated by NYMC,
our TRS, which will include fee income on all loans we originate
and gains and net interest income on all loans we sell, will be
subject to regular corporate income tax.
NYMC is presently licensed or authorized to do business in a
total of 40 states and the District of Columbia, and
license applications are pending in several other states.
|
|
|
Snapshot of Loan Originations(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended | |
|
Quarter Ended | |
|
Year Ended | |
|
|
March 31, 2005 | |
|
March 31, 2004 | |
|
December 31, 2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Dollars in millions) | |
Purchase
|
|
$ |
380.9 |
|
|
$ |
169.3 |
|
|
$ |
1,089.5 |
|
Refinancings
|
|
$ |
291.6 |
|
|
$ |
114.1 |
|
|
$ |
756.0 |
|
Fixed
|
|
$ |
307.8 |
|
|
$ |
137.9 |
|
|
$ |
878.7 |
|
ARM
|
|
$ |
364.7 |
|
|
$ |
145.5 |
|
|
$ |
966.8 |
|
Weighted Average FICO
|
|
|
705 |
|
|
|
703 |
|
|
|
703 |
|
Weighted Average LTV
|
|
|
74 |
% |
|
|
71 |
% |
|
|
77 |
% |
Weighted Average Coupon
|
|
|
5.88 |
% |
|
|
5.45 |
% |
|
|
5.63 |
% |
|
|
(1) |
Includes FHA loans. Beginning near the end of the first quarter
of 2004, our volume of FHA loans increased. Generally, FHA loans
have lower average balances and FICO scores. All FHA loans are
currently and will be in the future sold or brokered to third
parties. |
|
|
|
Snapshot of Loans Retained in Portfolio |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended | |
|
Year Ended | |
|
|
March 31, 2005 | |
|
December 31, 2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Dollars in millions) | |
5/1 ARM
|
|
$ |
135.2 |
|
|
$ |
46.2 |
|
3/1 ARM
|
|
|
295.2 |
|
|
|
110.0 |
|
2/1 ARM
|
|
|
16.4 |
|
|
|
3.8 |
|
One year or less ARM
|
|
|
34.6 |
|
|
|
28.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
481.4 |
|
|
$ |
188.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average FICO
|
|
|
729 |
|
|
|
733 |
|
Weighted Average LTV
|
|
|
69 |
% |
|
|
68 |
% |
Weighted Average Coupon
|
|
|
4.68 |
% |
|
|
4.54 |
% |
2
Our principal offices are located at 1301 Avenue of the
Americas, New York, New York 10019. Our telephone number is
(212) 634-9400. Our web site addresses are
http://www.nymtrust.com and http://www.nymc.com.
The information on our web sites does not constitute a part of
this prospectus.
|
|
|
|
|
We have exhibited significant growth over the last twelve
months, and we feel we are positioned to continue our growth for
the immediate future. |
|
|
|
For the three month period ended March 31, 2005, total
originations grew 137.2% to $672.5 million, compared to
$283.5 million for the three month period ended
March 31, 2004, due to both internal growth and to our
acquisitions of the mortgage banking operations of SIB Mortgage
Corp., or SIB, and the Northeast and Mid-Atlantic mortgage
banking operations of Guaranty Residential Lending, Inc., or GRL. |
|
|
|
Since our IPO, we have declared and paid dividends of $0.16 for
the third quarter of 2004, $0.24 for the fourth quarter of 2004
and $0.25 for the first quarter of 2005, and declared a dividend
of $0.25 for the second quarter of 2005 payable on July 26,
2005 to stockholders of record on June 14, 2005. |
|
|
|
We have begun to focus on expanding our wholesale origination
channel by hiring experienced managers to build out our
wholesale effort. These managers, along with a new team of
professionals, are focusing on originating loans that can be
retained in our portfolio. Wholesale originations should prove
to be a significant contribution to total originations by the
beginning of the fourth quarter of 2005. |
|
|
|
We continue to expand and diversify our geographic focus.
Originations in the tri-state area of New York, New Jersey and
Connecticut represented 54.6% of total originations for the
quarter ended March 31, 2005 compared to 86.5% for the
quarter ended March 31, 2004. |
Our Business Strategy
Our goal is to maximize the long-term sustainable difference
between the yield on our investments and the cost of financing
those assets. We intend to execute our strategy by:
|
|
|
|
|
continuing to focus on originating prime and other types of
residential mortgage loans through NYMC that we believe can be
used to grow our portfolio or sold at a profit; |
|
|
|
expanding our retail mortgage banking business through hiring
additional loan officers, the opening of new retail branch
offices in new markets and selectively pursuing strategic
acquisitions in the mortgage banking industry; |
|
|
|
increasing our portfolio size with self-originated loans with
the intent to enhance our returns while at the same time
managing the increased risk of loss associated with this
portfolio; and |
|
|
|
utilizing hedging strategies that we consider appropriate to
minimize exposure to interest rate changes. |
Summary Risk Factors
An investment in our common stock has risks. The Risk
Factors section of this prospectus contains a detailed
discussion of the most important risks, including the risks
summarized below.
|
|
|
|
|
we may experience a decline in the market value of our assets
due to rising interest rates; |
|
|
|
a decrease in the demand for mortgage loans due to a period of
rising interest rates may adversely affect our earnings, which
could negatively affect the cash available for distribution to
you; |
|
|
|
our continued success will depend on our ability to continue to
obtain financing to leverage our equity; |
|
|
|
we intend to continue to leverage our equity, which will
exacerbate any losses we incur on our planned investments and
may reduce the cash available for distribution to you; |
|
|
|
interest rate fluctuations resulting in our interest expense
exceeding our interest income would result in operating losses
for us and may limit or eliminate our ability to make
distributions to you; |
3
|
|
|
|
|
a prolonged economic slow down, a lengthy or severe recession or
declining real estate values could harm our operations; |
|
|
|
we have a limited operating history with respect to securitizing
mortgage loans or managing a portfolio of mortgage securities; |
|
|
|
our continued success will partially depend on our ability to
originate prime ARM loans for our portfolio; |
|
|
|
we may not be successful in maintaining our qualification as a
REIT for federal income tax purposes, in which case we would be
subject to federal income tax on our taxable income at regular
corporate rates, thereby reducing the amount of funds available
to distribute to you; and |
|
|
|
REIT distribution requirements could adversely affect our
liquidity. |
Our Management
We intend to be a self-managed and self-administered REIT. Our
senior management team has extensive experience in mortgage
banking and investing in and managing portfolios of residential
mortgage loans and residential mortgage-backed securities.
Additionally, our chief financial officer has prior experience
as a publicly traded REIT chief financial officer. We believe
this experience contributes significantly to our ability to
provide an attractive risk-adjusted return to our stockholders.
Our senior management team is discussed in more detail under
Management beginning on page 90.
Our History
We were formed as a Maryland corporation in September 2003. In
January 2004, we formed and capitalized New York Mortgage
Funding, LLC, or NYMF, as a wholly-owned subsidiary. In June
2004, we sold 15 million shares of our common stock in an
initial public offering, or IPO, at a price to the public of
$9.00 per share, raising net proceeds of approximately
$122 million after deducting the underwriters
discount and other offering expenses. We used substantially all
of the net proceeds from our IPO to purchase, on a leveraged
basis, approximately $1.2 billion of residential
mortgage-backed securities. Concurrent with our IPO, we acquired
100% of the equity interests of NYMC by issuing to its owners,
Steven B. Schnall, Joseph V. Fierro and their
respective affiliates, a total of 2,750,000 shares of
common stock. Prior to our IPO, we and NYMF did not have
recurring business operations.
Prior to the time we acquired NYMC, NYMCs business
strategy was to sell or broker all of the loans it originated to
third parties and the largest component of NYMCs net
income was generated by the gain on sale of such loans. For
accounting purposes and reporting purposes, our acquisition of
NYMC was accounted for as a reverse merger and the related
transfer of loans originated by NYMC to us was accounted for as
a transfer of assets between entities under common control.
Accordingly, we have recorded assets and liabilities transferred
from NYMC at their carrying amounts in the accounts of NYMC at
the date of transfer. Our consolidated financial statements
include our accounts subsequent to our IPO and also include the
accounts of NYMC and NYMF prior to the IPO. As a result, our
historical financial results reflect the financial operations of
this prior business strategy of selling virtually all of the
loans originated by NYMC to third parties. Furthermore, to the
degree we retain for investment selected ARM loans that we
originate, these loans are recorded at cost and no gain on sale,
as would otherwise be recognized if sold to a third party, is
recorded. Our post-IPO business strategy of investing in ARM
assets and the securitization of loans that we originate will
result in net interest income generated by such a portfolio
being the largest component of our net income. As a result, our
pre-IPO operations and financial results are not necessarily
comparable with our current and future operations and results.
Our REIT Status
As a REIT, we generally will not be subject to federal income
tax on REIT taxable income that we currently distribute to our
stockholders, but taxable income generated by NYMC, our taxable
REIT subsidiary, will be subject to regular corporate income
tax. Under the Internal Revenue Code, REITs are
4
subject to numerous organizational and operational requirements,
including a requirement that they distribute at least 90% of
their REIT taxable income to their stockholders. If we fail to
qualify for taxation as a REIT in any year, our income will be
taxed at regular corporate rates, and we may be precluded from
qualifying for treatment as a REIT for the four taxable years
following the year in which we failed to qualify. Even if we
qualify as a REIT for federal income tax purposes, we may still
be subject to state and local taxes on our income and property
and to federal income and excise taxes on our undistributed
income.
Dividend Policy and Distributions
In order to qualify as a REIT, we must distribute to our
stockholders at least 90% of our REIT taxable income each year.
To the extent that we distribute at least 90%, but less than
100% of our REIT taxable income in a taxable year, we will be
subject to federal corporate income tax on our undistributed
income. In addition, if we fail to distribute an amount during
each year equal to the sum of 85% of our REIT ordinary income
and 95% of our capital gain net income for that year and any
undistributed income from prior periods, we will be subject to a
4% nondeductible excise tax on the excess of the required
distribution over the amount we actually distributed. See
Federal Income Tax Consequences of Our Status as a
REIT Requirements for Qualification
Distribution Requirements. Distributions to our
stockholders are treated as dividends to the extent that we have
current or accumulated earnings and profits. We intend to
continue to make regular quarterly distributions to our
stockholders so that we distribute each year all or
substantially all of our REIT taxable income so as to avoid
paying corporate income tax and excise tax on our earnings and
to qualify for the tax benefits accorded to REITs under the
Internal Revenue Code. Our REIT taxable income may exceed our
cash available for distribution and the requirement to
distribute a substantial portion of our net taxable income could
cause us to:
|
|
|
|
|
sell assets in adverse market conditions; |
|
|
|
borrow on unfavorable terms; or |
|
|
|
distribute amounts that would otherwise be invested in future
acquisitions, capital expenditures or repayment of debt in order
to comply with the REIT distribution requirements. |
We declared a dividend of $0.25 per share for the quarter
ended June 30, 2005, which will be paid on July 26,
2005 to stockholders of record as of June 14, 2005.
Our ability to pay dividends to you will depend primarily on our
receipt of interest and principal payments from our mortgage
loans and from our mortgage-backed securities and any
distributions we receive from NYMC. As a taxable REIT
subsidiary, NYMC is subject to regular corporate income tax on
the taxable income that it generates. We may cause NYMC to
retain after-tax earnings or distribute all or a portion of its
after-tax earnings to us to the extent allowable under the REIT
provisions of the Internal Revenue Code. If NYMC distributes any
of its after-tax earnings to us, we will include that
distributed amount in the dividends we pay to our stockholders
and, for domestic non-corporate taxpayers, that portion of our
dividends, unlike distributions of our REIT taxable income,
generally will be eligible to be taxed at the current 15%
maximum marginal rate for regular corporate dividends. We also
have the authority to make a distribution of capital or of
assets. All distributions, however, must be authorized by our
board of directors.
If we are unable to successfully execute our business plan, we
may not have cash available to pay dividends, which could impact
our ability to quality as a REIT.
Stock Exchange Listing
Our common stock is currently listed on the New York Stock
Exchange under the symbol NTR.
Restrictions on Ownership of Our Common Stock
In order to assist us in maintaining our qualification as a REIT
under the Internal Revenue Code, our charter contains
restrictions on the number of shares of our capital stock that a
person may own. No person may acquire or hold, directly or
indirectly, in excess of 9.4% in value of the outstanding shares
of our capital
5
stock other than Mr. Schnall, who is permitted to hold up
to 12.0% of our outstanding common stock. These ownership limits
could delay, defer or prevent a transaction or a change in
control that might involve a premium price for our common stock
or otherwise be in your best interest. Our board of directors
may, in its sole discretion, waive the ownership limit with
respect to a particular stockholder if it is presented with
evidence satisfactory to it that the ownership of that
stockholder will not then or in the future jeopardize our status
as a REIT. Our charter also prohibits certain cooperatives,
governmental entities and tax-exempt organizations that are
exempt from the unrelated business income tax from owning our
stock because a tax could be imposed on us if our stock is held
by such entities and we own real estate mortgage investment
conduit, or REMIC, residual interests or, although the law is
unclear on the matter, an interest in a taxable mortgage pool.
See Description of Capital Stock Restrictions
on Ownership and Transfer beginning on page 111.
The Offering
|
|
|
Common stock offered |
|
6,000,000 |
|
Common stock to be outstanding after this offering |
|
23,797,375(1)(2) |
|
Use of proceeds |
|
We intend to use the net proceeds of this offering, which we
expect will be approximately $53.9 million, based on the
public offering price of
$ per
share, and after deducting the underwriting discount and
estimated offering expenses payable by us to invest, on a
leveraged basis, in Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac or AAA-rated
residential mortgage-backed securities. |
|
Risk factors |
|
See Risk Factors beginning on page 9 and other
information included in this prospectus for a discussion of the
factors you should consider carefully before deciding whether to
purchase our common stock. |
|
New York Stock Exchange symbol |
|
Our common stock is currently on the New York Stock Exchange
under the symbol NTR and we will apply to list the
shares of common stock sold in this offering on the New York
Stock Exchange. |
|
|
(1) |
Assumes that the underwriters over-allotment option to
purchase up to an additional 900,000 shares of common stock
will not be exercised. |
|
(2) |
Excludes 1,296,471 shares of our common stock reserved for
future issuance under our stock incentive plan upon completion
of this offering as restricted stock awards or upon exercise of
options, which number of shares assumes that the
underwriters over-allotment option is not exercised. The
shares reserved for issuance under our stock incentive plan may
be increased by up to 54,000 shares if the underwriters exercise
their over-allotment option in connection with this offering. |
6
Selected Consolidated Financial and Other Data
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended | |
|
|
|
|
March 31, | |
|
For the Year Ended December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
2001 | |
|
2000 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts) | |
Operating Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gains on sales of mortgage loans
|
|
$ |
4,321 |
|
|
$ |
3,506 |
|
|
$ |
20,835 |
|
|
$ |
23,031 |
|
|
$ |
9,858 |
|
|
$ |
6,429 |
|
|
$ |
3,336 |
|
Interest income
|
|
|
17,116 |
|
|
|
1,261 |
|
|
|
27,298 |
|
|
|
7,610 |
|
|
|
2,986 |
|
|
|
1,570 |
|
|
|
625 |
|
Brokered loan fees
|
|
|
2,000 |
|
|
|
2,183 |
|
|
|
6,895 |
|
|
|
6,682 |
|
|
|
5,241 |
|
|
|
3,749 |
|
|
|
4,317 |
|
Gain on sale of marketable securities
|
|
|
377 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
774 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Miscellaneous
|
|
|
114 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
227 |
|
|
|
45 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
48 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue
|
|
|
23,928 |
|
|
|
6,966 |
|
|
|
56,029 |
|
|
|
37,368 |
|
|
|
18,100 |
|
|
|
11,796 |
|
|
|
8,298 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Salaries, commissions, and benefits
|
|
|
7,143 |
|
|
|
2,719 |
|
|
|
17,118 |
|
|
|
9,247 |
|
|
|
5,788 |
|
|
|
3,644 |
|
|
|
2,891 |
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
11,690 |
|
|
|
609 |
|
|
|
16,013 |
|
|
|
3,266 |
|
|
|
1,673 |
|
|
|
1,289 |
|
|
|
476 |
|
Brokered loan expenses
|
|
|
1,519 |
|
|
|
1,284 |
|
|
|
5,276 |
|
|
|
3,734 |
|
|
|
2,992 |
|
|
|
2,174 |
|
|
|
2,235 |
|
General and administrative expenses
|
|
|
6,304 |
|
|
|
2,236 |
|
|
|
13,935 |
|
|
|
7,395 |
|
|
|
3,897 |
|
|
|
2,808 |
|
|
|
2,169 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total expenses
|
|
|
26,656 |
|
|
|
6,848 |
|
|
|
52,342 |
|
|
|
23,642 |
|
|
|
14,350 |
|
|
|
9,915 |
|
|
|
7,771 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income tax benefit
|
|
|
(2,728 |
) |
|
|
118 |
|
|
|
3,687 |
|
|
|
13,726 |
|
|
|
3,750 |
|
|
|
1,881 |
|
|
|
527 |
|
Income tax benefit
|
|
|
2,690 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,260 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$ |
(38 |
) |
|
$ |
118 |
|
|
$ |
4,947 |
|
|
$ |
13,726 |
|
|
$ |
3,750 |
|
|
$ |
1,881 |
|
|
$ |
527 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic income per share
|
|
$ |
0.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
0.28 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted income per share
|
|
$ |
0.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
0.27 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance Sheet Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$ |
7,322 |
|
|
$ |
4,523 |
|
|
$ |
7,613 |
|
|
$ |
4,047 |
|
|
$ |
2,746 |
|
|
$ |
1,549 |
|
|
$ |
52 |
|
Investment securities available for sale
|
|
|
1,112,990 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,204,745 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage loans held for investment
|
|
|
68,463 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
190,153 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage loans held in the securitization trust
|
|
|
417,383 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage loans held for sale
|
|
|
99,554 |
|
|
|
47,734 |
|
|
|
85,385 |
|
|
|
36,169 |
|
|
|
34,039 |
|
|
|
9,894 |
|
|
|
3,784 |
|
Due from loan purchasers
|
|
|
91,340 |
|
|
|
93,851 |
|
|
|
79,904 |
|
|
|
58,862 |
|
|
|
40,621 |
|
|
|
20,707 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
1,856,385 |
|
|
|
158,123 |
|
|
|
1,614,762 |
|
|
|
110,081 |
|
|
|
83,004 |
|
|
|
34,561 |
|
|
|
12,592 |
|
Financing arrangements
|
|
|
1,695,306 |
|
|
|
136,134 |
|
|
|
1,475,012 |
|
|
|
90,425 |
|
|
|
73,016 |
|
|
|
29,705 |
|
|
|
10,050 |
|
Subordinated debentures notes(1)
|
|
|
25,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,707 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
1,741,727 |
|
|
|
157,713 |
|
|
|
1,495,280 |
|
|
|
110,555 |
|
|
|
76,504 |
|
|
|
30,891 |
|
|
|
10,538 |
|
Equity (deficit)
|
|
|
114,658 |
|
|
|
410 |
|
|
|
119,482 |
|
|
|
(474 |
) |
|
|
6,500 |
|
|
|
3,670 |
|
|
|
2,054 |
|
Other Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase originations
|
|
$ |
380,900 |
|
|
$ |
169,305 |
|
|
$ |
1,089,499 |
|
|
$ |
803,446 |
|
|
$ |
469,404 |
|
|
$ |
374,454 |
|
|
$ |
352,634 |
|
Refinancing originations
|
|
|
291,600 |
|
|
|
114,146 |
|
|
|
756,006 |
|
|
|
796,879 |
|
|
|
407,827 |
|
|
|
209,748 |
|
|
|
45,753 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total originations
|
|
$ |
672,500 |
|
|
$ |
283,451 |
|
|
$ |
1,845,505 |
|
|
$ |
1,600,325 |
|
|
$ |
877,231 |
|
|
$ |
584,202 |
|
|
$ |
398,387 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed-rate originations
|
|
$ |
307,800 |
|
|
$ |
137,960 |
|
|
$ |
878,749 |
|
|
$ |
890,172 |
|
|
$ |
518,382 |
|
|
$ |
398,056 |
|
|
$ |
191,981 |
|
Adjustable-rate originations
|
|
|
364,700 |
|
|
|
145,491 |
|
|
|
966,756 |
|
|
|
710,153 |
|
|
|
358,849 |
|
|
|
186,146 |
|
|
|
206,406 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total originations
|
|
$ |
672,500 |
|
|
$ |
283,451 |
|
|
$ |
1,845,505 |
|
|
$ |
1,600,325 |
|
|
$ |
877,231 |
|
|
$ |
584,202 |
|
|
$ |
398,387 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average middle credit score non-FHA(2)
|
|
|
712 |
|
|
|
703 |
|
|
|
715 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average middle credit score all originations
|
|
|
705 |
|
|
|
703 |
|
|
|
703 |
|
|
|
719 |
|
|
|
716 |
|
|
|
713 |
|
|
|
714 |
|
Total mortgage sales ($000)
|
|
$ |
426,768 |
|
|
$ |
199,358 |
|
|
$ |
1,435,340 |
|
|
$ |
1,234,848 |
|
|
$ |
633,223 |
|
|
$ |
404,470 |
|
|
$ |
170,574 |
|
Brokered originations ($000)
|
|
$ |
109,379 |
|
|
$ |
84,093 |
|
|
$ |
410,052 |
|
|
$ |
365,477 |
|
|
$ |
244,008 |
|
|
$ |
179,732 |
|
|
$ |
209,345 |
|
Origination retained in investment portfolio
|
|
$ |
136,393 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Weighted average whole loan sales price over par
|
|
|
1.76 |
% |
|
|
2.13 |
% |
|
|
2.02 |
% |
|
|
1.75 |
% |
|
|
1.52 |
% |
|
|
1.37 |
% |
|
|
1.27 |
% |
Salaries, general and administrative expense as a percentage of
total loans originated
|
|
|
1.99 |
% |
|
|
1.70 |
% |
|
|
1.68 |
% |
|
|
1.04 |
% |
|
|
1.10 |
% |
|
|
1.10 |
% |
|
|
1.27 |
% |
Yield on investment securities available for sale
|
|
|
3.89 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.89 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yield on loans held for investment
|
|
|
4.44 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.09 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of funds (including hedges)
|
|
|
2.86 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.47 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest spread
|
|
|
1.15 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.43 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of locations at period end
|
|
|
63 |
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
66 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
Number of employees at period end
|
|
|
810 |
|
|
|
447 |
|
|
|
782 |
|
|
|
335 |
|
|
|
184 |
|
|
|
147 |
|
|
|
117 |
|
Dividends declared per common share
|
|
$ |
0.25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
0.40 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
(1) |
For the year ended December 31, 2003, represents
subordinated notes due to members of our predecessor. |
|
(2) |
Beginning near the end of the first quarter of 2004, our volume
of FHA loans increased; prior to that time the volume of FHA
loan originations was immaterial. Generally, FHA loans have
lower average balances and FICO scores. All FHA loans are
currently and will be in the future sold or brokered to third
parties. |
8
RISK FACTORS
You should carefully consider the risks described below,
together with all of the other information included in this
prospectus, before you decide to purchase our securities.
Investing in our common stock involves a high degree of risk.
Any of the following factors could harm our business and future
results of operations and could result in a partial or complete
loss of your investment.
Risks Related to Our Business
|
|
|
We may experience a decline in the market value of our
assets. |
The market value of the interest-bearing assets that we have
acquired and intend to continue to acquire, most notably
mortgage-backed securities and originated or purchased
residential mortgage loans and any related hedging instruments,
may move inversely with changes in interest rates. We anticipate
that increases in interest rates will tend to decrease our net
income. A decline in the market value of our investments may
limit our ability to borrow or result in lenders requiring
additional collateral or initiating margin calls under our
repurchase agreements. As a result, we could be required to sell
some of our investments under adverse market conditions in order
to maintain liquidity. If such sales are made at prices lower
than the amortized costs of such investments, we will incur
losses. A default under our repurchase agreements could also
result in the liquidation of the underlying investments used as
collateral and result in a loss equal to the difference between
the value of the collateral and the amount owed under our
repurchase agreements.
|
|
|
A decrease in the demand for mortgage loans due to a
period of rising interest rates may adversely affect our
earnings, which could negatively affect the cash available for
distribution to you. |
Rising interest rates generally reduce the demand for consumer
credit, including mortgage loans. Interest rates have been at
relatively low levels in recent years. The Mortgage Bankers
Association of America has predicted that residential mortgage
loan originations will decrease in 2005 and 2006 primarily due
to an anticipated decrease in refinancings caused by rising
interest rates. In a period of rising interest rates, we expect
to originate and sell fewer loans. Accordingly, a period of
rising interest rates would adversely affect our business,
revenues and results of operations, which could adversely affect
the amount of cash available for distribution to you.
|
|
|
Our success will partially depend on our ability to
originate prime adjustable-rate and hybrid mortgage loans for
our portfolio. |
We have built and intend to continue to build a portfolio of
prime adjustable-rate and hybrid mortgage loans that will, over
time, be comprised primarily of mortgage loans that we originate
through NYMC. This source of mortgage loans is a key part of our
strategy. During the quarter ended March 31, 2005,
approximately 54.2% of our mortgage loan originations, as
measured by principal balance, were adjustable-rate and hybrid
loans, although a portion of these loans did not meet our
investment criteria for retention in our portfolio.
If NYMC is not able to originate prime adjustable-rate and
hybrid mortgage loans that meet our investment criteria in the
volume we expect, the time required for, and the cost associated
with, building our portfolio may be greater than expected, which
could have an adverse effect on our results of operations and
our ability to make distributions to you.
|
|
|
Our success will depend on our ability to obtain financing
to leverage our equity. |
If we are limited in our ability to leverage our assets, the
returns on our portfolio may be harmed. A key element of our
strategy is our use of leverage to increase the size of our
portfolio in an attempt to enhance our returns. As of
March 31, 2005, our leverage ratio, defined as total
financing facilities less subordinated debentures outstanding
divided by total stockholders equity plus subordinated
debentures at March 31, 2005 was 12.1 times. Our
repurchase agreements are not currently committed facilities,
meaning that the counterparties to these agreements may at any
time choose to restrict or eliminate our future access to the
9
facilities and we have no other committed credit facilities
through which we may leverage our equity. If we are unable to
leverage our equity to the extent we currently anticipate, the
returns on our portfolio could be diminished, which may limit or
eliminate our ability to pay dividends to you.
|
|
|
We currently leverage our equity, which will exacerbate
any losses we incur on our current and future investments and
may reduce cash available for distribution to you. |
We currently leverage our equity through borrowings, generally
through the use of repurchase agreements, bank credit
facilities, securitizations, including the issuance of
collateralized debt securities, which are obligations issued in
multiple classes secured by an underlying portfolio of
securities, and other borrowings. The amount of leverage we
incur varies depending on our ability to obtain credit
facilities and our lenders estimates of the value of our
portfolios cash flow. The return on our investments and
cash available for distribution to you may be reduced to the
extent that changes in market conditions cause the cost of our
financing to increase relative to the income that can be derived
from the assets we hold in our portfolio. Further, the leverage
on our equity may exacerbate any losses we incur.
Our debt service payments will reduce the net income available
for distributions to you. We may not be able to meet our debt
service obligations and, to the extent that we cannot, we risk
the loss of some or all of our assets to foreclosure or sale to
satisfy our debt obligations. We currently leverage through
repurchase agreements. A decrease in the value of the assets may
lead to margin calls which we will have to satisfy. We may not
have the funds available to satisfy any such margin calls. We
have a target overall leverage amount of 8 to 12 times our
equity, but there is no established limitation, other than may
be required by our financing arrangements, on our leverage ratio
or on the aggregate amount of our borrowings.
|
|
|
The terms of our warehouse credit facilities and
repurchase agreements restrict our ability to pay dividends in
situations where we are not currently in compliance with certain
financial and other covenants. |
The terms of our warehouse credit facilities and repurchase
agreements contain a number of restrictive financial and other
covenants that, among other things, require us to maintain a
minimum ratio of total liabilities to tangible net worth,
minimum levels of tangible net worth, liquidity and
stockholders equity and maximum leverage ratios, as well
as to comply with applicable regulatory and other requirements.
These facilities and agreements may restrict our ability to pay
any dividends to you if we are not in compliance with the
covenants.
|
|
|
Our mortgage loans are concentrated in specific geographic
regions and any adverse market or economic conditions in those
regions may have a disproportionately adverse effect on the
ability of our customers to make their loan payments. |
Our mortgage loan originations are currently concentrated in
specific geographic regions. For example, for the quarter ended
March 31, 2005, approximately 54.6% of the residential
mortgage loans that we originated, as measured by principal
balance, are with borrowers located in New York, New Jersey and
Connecticut. In addition to the mortgage loans that we
originated, we also invest in mortgage-backed securities and
other residential mortgage loans that we did not originate. For
the quarter ended March 31, 2005, approximately 30.5% of
the residential mortgage loans in our portfolio, as measured by
principal balance, were with borrowers in California. Adverse
market or economic conditions in a particular region or state
may disproportionately increase the risk that borrowers in that
region or state are unable to make their mortgage payments. In
addition, the market value of the real estate securing those
mortgage loans could be adversely affected by adverse market and
economic conditions in that region or state. Any sustained
period of increased payment delinquencies, foreclosures or
losses caused by adverse market or economic conditions in that
geographic region or state could adversely affect both our net
interest income from loans in our portfolio as well as our
ability to originate, sell and securitize loans, which would
significantly harm our revenues, results of operations,
financial condition, business prospects and our ability to make
distributions to you.
10
|
|
|
Failure to succeed in new geographic markets may limit our
growth and could adversely affect our profitability. |
As of March 31, 2005, NYMC operated a network of 31 full
service branch loan origination locations and 32 satellite loan
origination locations in 12 different states and the District of
Columbia and was licensed or authorized to do business in 40
different states. However, for the quarter ended March 31,
2005 approximately 54.6% of NYMCs residential mortgage
loans, as measured by principal balance, were originated in just
three states, New York, New Jersey and Connecticut. NYMC
has historically, and we will continue to, concentrate on
retail, referral-based, mortgage loans to borrowers with strong
credit profiles. As part of our business plan, we intend to
expand our loan origination network and business in geographic
areas in which we may have little or no prior operating
experience, in which our referral-based loan origination network
may be insufficiently developed and in which it may be difficult
to recruit experienced loan officers. Accordingly, we cannot
assure you that we will be successful in expanding our loan
origination network in these geographic areas, the failure of
which could significantly limit our growth and cause us to incur
costs greater than those incurred in other areas, which may
adversely affect our profitability.
|
|
|
Interest rate fluctuations may cause losses. |
We believe our primary interest rate exposure relates to our
mortgage loans, mortgage-backed securities and variable-rate
debt, as well as the interest rate swaps and caps that we
utilize for risk management purposes. Changes in interest rates
may affect our net interest income, which is the difference
between the interest income we earn on our interest-earning
investments and the interest expense we incur in financing these
investments. Changes in the level of interest rates also can
affect our ability to originate or acquire mortgage loans or
mortgage-backed securities, the value of our assets and our
ability to realize gains from the sale of such assets. In a
period of rising interest rates, our interest expense could
increase while the interest we earn on our assets would not
change as rapidly. This would adversely affect our profitability.
Our operating results depend in large part on differences
between income received from our assets, net of credit losses,
and our financing costs. We anticipate that in most cases, for
any period during which our assets are not match-funded, the
income from such assets will adjust more slowly to interest rate
fluctuations than the cost of our borrowings. Consequently,
changes in interest rates, particularly short-term interest
rates, may significantly influence our net income. We anticipate
that increases in interest rates will tend to decrease our net
income. Interest rate fluctuations resulting in our interest
expense exceeding our interest income would result in operating
losses for us and may limit or eliminate our ability to make
distributions to you.
|
|
|
A prolonged economic slowdown, a lengthy or severe
recession or declining real estate values could harm our
operations. |
We believe the risks associated with our business are more acute
during periods of economic slowdown or recession if these
periods are accompanied by declining real estate values.
Declining real estate values will likely reduce our level of new
mortgage loan originations, since borrowers often use increases
in the value of their existing home to support the refinancing
of their existing mortgage loans or the purchase of new homes at
higher levels of borrowings. Further, declining real estate
values significantly increase the likelihood that we will incur
losses on our loans in the event of default. Any sustained
period of increased payment delinquencies, foreclosures or
losses could adversely affect both our net interest income from
loans in our portfolio as well as our ability to originate, sell
and securitize loans, which would significantly harm our
revenues, results of operations, financial condition, business
prospects and our ability to make distributions to you.
|
|
|
We have a limited operating history with respect to
securitizing mortgage loans or managing a portfolio of mortgage
securities, which limits your ability to evaluate a key
component of our business strategy and our growth prospects and
increases your investment risk. |
Historically, NYMCs business has consisted of the
origination and sale of mortgage loans of all types, with a
particular focus on prime adjustable- and fixed-rate, first
lien, residential purchase mortgage loans. Our strategy includes
building a leveraged portfolio of residential mortgage loans
comprised largely of prime
11
adjustable-rate mortgage loans that we originate, including
hybrid adjustable-rate loans that have an initial fixed-rate
period, while continuing, generally, to sell the fixed-rate
loans that we originate to third parties. In addition, we invest
in mortgage-backed securities on a leveraged basis. Although
certain members of our senior management team have past
experience in mortgage banking and investing in and managing
portfolios of residential mortgage loans and mortgage-backed
securities, we have a limited history with respect to
securitizing mortgage loans or managing a portfolio of mortgage
securities, having completed just one securitization in
February 2005 and having managed an investment portfolio of
mortgages and mortgage securities commencing only after the
completion of our IPO in June 2004. Our ability to complete
securitizations in the future on favorable terms will depend
upon a number of factors, including the experience and ability
of our management team, conditions in the securities markets
generally, conditions in the mortgage-backed securities market
specifically, the performance of our portfolio of securitized
loans and our ability to obtain leverage. In addition, poor
performance of any pool of loans we do securitize could increase
the expense of any subsequent securitization we bring to market.
Accordingly, a decline in the securitization market or a change
in the markets demand for our securities could have a
material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial
condition and business prospects. If we are unable to securitize
efficiently the adjustable-rate and hybrid mortgage loans that
we originate and that we may invest in from time to time, then
our revenues for the duration of our investment in those loans
would decline, which would lower our earnings for the time the
loans remain in our portfolio. We cannot assure you that we will
be able to complete loan securitizations in the future on
favorable terms, or at all.
|
|
|
Loan prepayment rates may increase, adversely affecting
yields on our planned investments. |
The value of the assets we have acquired and intend to continue
to acquire may be affected by prepayment rates on mortgage
loans. Prepayment rates on mortgage loans are influenced by
changes in current interest rates and a variety of economic,
geographic and other factors beyond our control, and
consequently, such prepayment rates cannot be predicted with
certainty. In periods of declining mortgage loan interest rates,
prepayments on mortgage loans generally increase. If general
interest rates decline as well, the proceeds of such prepayments
received during such periods are likely to be reinvested by us
in assets with lower yields than the yields on the assets that
were prepaid. In addition, the market value of any mortgage
assets may, because of the risk of prepayment, benefit less than
other fixed-income securities from declining interest rates.
Conversely, in periods of rising interest rates, prepayments on
mortgage loans generally decrease, in which case we would not
have the prepayment proceeds available to invest in assets with
higher yields. Under certain interest rate and prepayment
scenarios, we may fail to recoup fully our cost of acquisition
of certain investments.
|
|
|
The mortgage loans we typically invest in and the mortgage
loans underlying the mortgage-backed securities we typically
invest in are subject to risks of delinquency, foreclosure and
loss, which could result in losses to us. |
Residential mortgage loans are secured by residential properties
and are subject to risks of delinquency and foreclosure, and
risks of loss. The ability of a borrower to repay a loan secured
by residential property typically is dependent primarily upon
the income or assets of the borrower. In addition, the ability
of the borrower to repay its mortgage loan may be affected by,
among other things: property location and condition, competition
and demand for comparable properties, changes in zoning laws for
the property or its surrounding area, environmental
contamination at the property, the occurrence of any uninsured
casualty at the property, changes in national, regional or local
economic conditions, declines in regional or local real estate
values, increases in interest rates, real estate tax rates,
changes in governmental rules, regulations and fiscal policies,
including environmental legislation, acts of God, terrorism,
social unrest and civil disturbances.
In the event of any default under a mortgage loan held directly
by us, we will bear a risk of loss of principal to the extent of
any deficiency between the value of the collateral that we can
realize upon foreclosure and sale and the principal and accrued
interest of the mortgage loan, which could have a material
adverse effect on our cash flow from operations and could limit
the amount we have available for distribution to you. In the
event of the bankruptcy of a mortgage loan borrower, the
mortgage loan to such borrower will be
12
deemed to be secured only to the extent of the value of the
underlying collateral at the time of bankruptcy (as determined
by the bankruptcy court), and the lien securing the mortgage
loan will be subject to the avoidance powers of the bankruptcy
trustee or debtor-in-possession to the extent the lien is
unenforceable under state law. Foreclosure of a mortgage loan
can be an expensive and lengthy process that can have a
substantial negative effect on our originally anticipated return
on the foreclosed mortgage loan. Residential mortgage-backed
securities evidence interests in or are secured by pools of
residential mortgage loans. Accordingly, the mortgage-backed
securities we typically invest in are subject to all of the
risks of the underlying mortgage loans.
|
|
|
We commenced operations as a newly public company in June
2004 and have a limited operating history. |
NYMC, our mortgage banking subsidiary, has a substantial
operating history, but we were not formed until
September 2003 and had no operations prior to closing our
IPO on June 29, 2004. As a result, we have a limited
history managing a portfolio of mortgage loans or
mortgage-backed securities for you to determine the likelihood
of our achieving our investment objectives. Our operating
results depend on many factors, including:
|
|
|
|
|
the availability of opportunities for the acquisition of assets; |
|
|
|
our ability to originate prime adjustable-rate and hybrid
mortgage loans for our portfolio; |
|
|
|
the level and volatility of interest rates; |
|
|
|
readily accessible short- and long-term funding; |
|
|
|
conditions in the financial markets; and |
|
|
|
general economic conditions. |
Our failure to invest the net proceeds of this offering in loans
and securities meeting our investment criteria could diminish
our returns and have an adverse effect on our ability to make
distributions to you.
|
|
|
We rely on key personnel with long-standing business
relationships, the loss of any of whom could impair our ability
to successfully operate. |
Our future success depends, to a significant extent, on the
continued services of Steven B. Schnall, our chairman of the
board and co-chief executive officer, David A. Akre, our
co-chief executive officer, Raymond A.
Redlingshafer, Jr., our president and chief investment
officer and other key members of our senior management team. In
particular, the extent and nature of the relationships that
these individuals have developed with financial institutions and
existing and prospective mortgage loan origination channels are
critically important to the success of our business. Although we
have employment agreements with Mr. Schnall and other key
executives, these executives may not remain employed with us. We
do not maintain key person life insurance on any of our
officers. The loss of services of one or more members of our
senior management team could harm our business and our prospects.
|
|
|
Our directors have approved broad investment guidelines
for us and do not approve each investment we make. |
Our board of directors has given us substantial discretion to
invest in accordance with our broad investment guidelines. Our
board of directors periodically reviews our investment
guidelines and our portfolio. However, our board of directors
does not review each proposed investment. In addition, in
conducting periodic reviews, our directors rely primarily on
information provided to them by our executive officers.
Furthermore, transactions entered into by us may be difficult or
impossible to unwind by the time they are reviewed by our
directors. We have substantial discretion within our broad
investment guidelines in determining the types of assets we may
decide are proper investments for us.
13
|
|
|
We may change our investment strategy without your
consent, which may result in our investing in riskier
investments than our currently planned investments. |
We may change our investment strategy at any time without the
consent of our stockholders, which could result in our making
investments that are different from, and possibly riskier than,
the investments described in this prospectus. A change in our
investment strategy may increase our exposure to, among other
things, credit risk, interest rate risk and real estate market
fluctuations.
|
|
|
Our hedging transactions may limit our gains or result in
losses. |
We typically use derivatives, primarily interest rate swaps and
caps, to hedge our liabilities and this has certain risks,
including the risk that losses on a hedging transaction will
reduce the amount of cash available for distribution to you and
that such losses may exceed the amount invested in such
instruments. Our board of directors has adopted a general policy
with respect to the use of derivatives, which generally allows
us to use derivatives when we deem appropriate for risk
management purposes, but does not set forth specific guidelines.
To the extent consistent with maintaining our status as a REIT,
we may use derivatives, including interest rate swaps and caps,
options, term repurchase contracts, forward contracts and
futures contracts, in our risk management strategy to limit the
effects of changes in interest rates on our operations. However,
a hedge may not be effective in eliminating the risks inherent
in any particular position. Our profitability may be adversely
affected during any period as a result of the use of derivatives
in a hedging transaction.
|
|
|
We may be required to repurchase mortgage loans that we
have sold or to indemnify holders of our mortgage-backed
securities. |
If any of the mortgage loans that we originate and sell, or that
we pledge to secure mortgage-backed securities that we issue in
our securitizations, do not comply with the representations and
warranties that we make about the characteristics of the loans,
the borrowers and the properties securing the loans, we may be
required to repurchase those loans in the case of the loans that
we have sold, or replace them with substitute loans or cash in
the case of securitized loans. If this occurs, we may have to
bear any associated losses directly. In addition, in the case of
loans that we have sold, we may be required to indemnify the
purchasers of such loans for losses or expenses incurred as a
result of a breach of a representation or warranty made by us.
Repurchased loans typically require an allocation of working
capital to carry on our books, and our ability to borrow against
such assets is limited, which could limit the amount by which we
can leverage our equity. Any significant repurchases or
indemnification payments could significantly harm our cash flow
and results of operations and limit our ability to make
distributions to you.
|
|
|
We may be subject to losses due to fraudulent and
negligent acts on the part of loan applicants, mortgage brokers,
other vendors and our employees. |
When we originate mortgage loans, we rely upon information
supplied by borrowers and other third parties, including
information contained in the applicants loan application,
property appraisal reports, title information and employment and
income documentation. If any of this information is
misrepresented or falsified and if we do not discover it prior
to funding a loan, the actual value of such loan may be
significantly lower than anticipated. As a practical matter, we
generally bear the risk of loss associated with a
misrepresentation whether it is made by the loan applicant, the
mortgage broker, another third party or one of our employees. A
loan subject to a material misrepresentation is typically
unsaleable or is subject to repurchase or substitution if it is
sold or securitized prior to detection of the misrepresentation.
Although we may have rights against persons and entities who
made or knew about the misrepresentation, those persons and
entities may be difficult to locate, and it is often difficult
to collect any monetary losses from them that we may have
suffered.
In addition, for the quarter ended March 31, 2005, with
respect to approximately 37.4% of the mortgage loans we
originated, as measured by principal balance, we received less
than full documentation of the borrowers income and/or
assets. In those cases, we base our credit decision on the
borrowers credit score and credit history, the value of
the property securing the loan and the effect of the loan on the
borrowers debt
14
service requirements. We believe that there is a higher risk of
default on loans where there is less than full documentation of
the borrowers income and/or assets.
|
|
|
Our past operating results have occurred during a period
of rapid growth for the residential mortgage industry and may
not be indicative of our future operating results. |
Our growth rate has benefited from low interest rates, a long
period of economic growth and strategic acquisitions of mortgage
origination platforms. NYMCs loan originations grew by
more than 401.7% between the years of 2000 and 2003.
Furthermore, despite the overall 30.4% decline in mortgage
originations from 2003 to 2004 as forecast by the April 14,
2005 Mortgage Finance Forecast of the MBAA, our origination
volume increased 15.3% during this period, much of which was due
to growth through acquisitions that we completed during the
period. Indeed, the MBAA projects that overall loan originations
will decline in 2005 compared to 2004 and will decline further
in 2006. These projected declines in overall volume of closed
loan originations are likely to have a negative effect on our
loan origination volume and net income. Accordingly, our
historical performance may not be indicative of future results,
and our results of operations may be materially adversely
affected as interest rates rise. In addition, NYMCs recent
and rapid growth may distort some of its ratios and financial
statistics and our change in business strategy to include the
development of a portfolio of mortgage loans and mortgage-backed
securities makes period-to-period comparisons difficult. In
light of this growth and change in business strategy, our
historical performance and operating and origination data may be
of little relevance in predicting our future performance.
|
|
|
If we do not manage our growth effectively, our financial
performance could be harmed. |
In recent years, we have experienced rapid growth which has
placed pressure on our management, administrative, operational
and financial infrastructure. If we continue to experience
similar rapid growth, we may experience those same pressures. As
of March 31, 2005, NYMC had grown to employ approximately
810 people, many of whom have limited experience with us and a
limited understanding of our systems and controls. An increase
in the size of our operations may make it more difficult for us
to ensure that we originate quality loans. We will need to
attract and hire additional loan officers and management
personnel in a competitive hiring environment to expand our
business and, at the same time, continue to upgrade and expand
our financial, operational and managerial systems and controls.
We cannot assure you that we will be able to meet our capital
needs, expand our systems effectively, allocate our human
resources optimally nor identify and hire qualified employees.
The failure to manage our growth effectively may significantly
harm our business, financial condition, liquidity and
profitability.
|
|
|
We face intense competition that could adversely affect
our market share and our revenues. |
We face intense competition from finance and mortgage banking
companies, other mortgage REITs, Internet-based lending
companies where entry barriers are relatively low, and, to a
growing extent, from traditional bank and thrift lenders that
have increased their participation in the mortgage industry. As
we seek to expand our loan origination business further and
expand our business strategy to build a portfolio of mortgage
loans and mortgage-backed securities, we will face a significant
number of additional competitors, many of whom will be well
established in the markets we seek to penetrate. Some of our
competitors are much larger than we are, have better name
recognition than we do and have far greater financial and other
resources than we do.
We believe that the majority of our competition comes from the
mortgage industry. In addition to mortgage banking companies,
Internet-based lending companies, traditional banks and thrift
lenders, the government sponsored entities Fannie Mae and
Freddie Mac are also expanding their participation in the
mortgage industry. While the government sponsored entities
presently do not have the legal authority to originate mortgage
loans, they do have the authority to buy loans. If as a result
of their purchasing practices, these government sponsored
entities experience significantly higher-than-expected losses,
the experience could adversely affect overall investor
perception of the mortgage industry.
15
Competition in the industry can take many forms, including lower
interest rates and fees, less stringent underwriting standards,
convenience in obtaining a loan, customer service, amount and
term of a loan and marketing and distribution channels. The need
to maintain mortgage loan volume in this competitive environment
creates a risk of price and quality competition in the mortgage
industry. Price competition could cause us to lower the interest
rates that we charge borrowers, which could lower the value of
our loans we sell or retain in our portfolio. If our competitors
adopt less stringent underwriting standards, we will be
pressured to do so as well. If we do not relax underwriting
standards in response to our competitors, we may lose market
share. If we relax our underwriting standards in response to
price competition, we may be exposed to higher credit risk
without receiving higher pricing to compensate for the higher
risk. Any increase in these pricing and underwriting pressures
could reduce the volume of our loan originations and sales and
significantly harm our business, financial condition, liquidity
and results of operations.
|
|
|
Our business may suffer from risks related to potential
future acquisitions. |
We intend to selectively pursue strategic acquisitions in the
mortgage banking business as part of our business strategy to
grow our business. We may overvalue the business or assets we
are seeking to acquire and, as a result, we may pay a purchase
price that exceeds the fair value of the acquired business or
assets. In addition, even if we pay a fair price for any
acquired business, we may not be able to integrate the acquired
business with our own efficiently. Finally, we may incur
unforeseen liabilities in connection with any acquisition we
undertake. Any of the foregoing risks could have a material
adverse effect on our financial condition or results of
operations and our ability to make distributions to you.
With respect to our business strategy to grow in part through
strategic acquisitions of other mortgage banking businesses or
related assets, we may not be able to identify suitable
acquisitions at acceptable prices or have access to sufficient
capital to take advantage of desirable acquisitions. If we
cannot identify suitable acquisitions or if we cannot access
sufficient capital to take advantage of such acquisitions, we
may have to curtail our business strategy to grow in part
through strategic acquisitions, which could limit our ability to
achieve a competitive strategic position and materially impact
our long-term success.
|
|
|
The success and growth of our mortgage loan origination
business will depend upon our ability to adapt to and implement
technological changes. |
Our mortgage loan origination business is dependent upon our
ability to interface effectively with our borrowers and other
third parties and to process loan applications efficiently. The
origination process is becoming more dependent upon
technological advancement, such as the ability to process
applications over the Internet, interface with borrowers and
other third parties through electronic means and underwrite loan
applications using specialized software. Implementing new
technology and maintaining the efficiency of the current
technology used in our operations may require significant
capital expenditures. As these requirements increase in the
future, we will have to develop these technological capabilities
fully to remain competitive or our business will be
significantly harmed.
|
|
|
An interruption in service or breach in security of our
information systems could impair our ability to originate loans
on a timely basis and may result in lost business. |
We rely heavily upon communications and information systems to
conduct our business. Any failure or interruption in service or
breach in security of our information systems or the third-party
information systems on which we rely could cause underwriting or
other delays and could result in fewer loan applications being
received and processed and reduced efficiency in loan servicing.
We cannot assure you that no material failures or interruptions
will occur or, if they do occur, that we or the third parties on
whom we rely will adequately address them. The occurrence of any
failures or interruptions could significantly harm our business.
|
|
|
Our operations are subject to a body of complex laws and
regulations at the federal, state and local levels. |
We must comply with the laws, rules and regulations, as well as
judicial and administrative decisions, of all jurisdictions in
which we originate mortgage loans, as well as an extensive body
of federal laws, rules and regulations. The volume of new or
modified laws, rules and regulations applicable to our business
has increased
16
in recent years and individual municipalities have also begun to
enact laws, rules and regulations that restrict or otherwise
affect loan origination activities, and in some cases loan
servicing activities. The laws, rules and regulations of each of
these jurisdictions are different, complex and, in some cases,
in direct conflict with each other. It may be more difficult to
identify comprehensively, to interpret accurately, to program
properly our information systems and to effectively train our
personnel with respect to all of these laws, rules and
regulations, thereby potentially increasing the risks of
non-compliance with these laws, rules and regulations.
Our failure to comply with these laws, rules and regulations can
lead to:
|
|
|
|
|
civil and criminal liability, including potential monetary
penalties; |
|
|
|
loss of state licenses or permits required for continued lending
and servicing operations; |
|
|
|
legal defenses causing delay or otherwise adversely affecting
our ability to enforce loans, or giving the borrower the right
to rescind or cancel the loan transaction; |
|
|
|
demands for indemnification or loan repurchases from purchasers
of our loans; |
|
|
|
class action lawsuits; and |
|
|
|
administrative enforcement actions. |
Some states in which we operate may impose regulatory
requirements on our officers and directors and parties holding
10%, and in some cases 5%, of our outstanding shares of common
stock. If any officer, director or person holding 10%, and in
some cases 5%, or more of our outstanding shares of common stock
fails to meet or refuses to comply with a states
applicable regulatory requirements for mortgage lending, we
could lose our authority to conduct business in that state. The
loss of our authority to conduct business in a state, for this
or any other reason, could have a material adverse effect on our
business, financial condition, liquidity and results of
operations.
|
|
|
New legislation may restrict our ability to make mortgage
loans, negatively impacting our revenues. |
In recent years, federal and several state and local laws, rules
and regulations have been adopted, or are under consideration,
that are intended to eliminate certain lending practices, often
referred to as predatory lending practices, that are
considered to be abusive. Many of these laws, rules and
regulations restrict commonly accepted lending activities and
would impose additional costly and burdensome compliance
requirements on us. These laws, rules and regulations impose
certain restrictions on loans on which certain points and fees
or the annual percentage rate, or APR, meets or exceeds
specified thresholds. Some of these restrictions expose a lender
to risks of litigation and regulatory sanction regardless of how
carefully a loan is underwritten. In addition, an increasing
number of these laws, rules and regulations seek to impose
liability for violations on the purchasers of mortgage loans,
regardless of whether a purchaser knew of or participated in the
violation. Accordingly, the third parties that buy our loans or
provide financing for our loan originations may not want, and
are not contractually required, to buy or finance loans that do
not comply with these laws, rules and regulations.
The continued enactment of these laws, rules and regulations may
prevent us from making certain loans and may cause us to reduce
the APR or the points and fees we charge on the mortgage loans
that we originate. In addition, the difficulty of managing the
compliance risks presented by these laws, rules and regulations
may decrease the availability of warehouse financing and the
overall demand for the purchase of our originated loans. These
laws, rules and regulations have increased, and may continue to
increase, our cost of doing business as we have been required,
and may continue to be required, to develop systems and
procedures to ensure that we do not violate any aspect of these
new requirements.
In addition, many of these state laws, rules and regulations are
not applicable to the mortgage loan operations of national banks
or other financial institutions chartered by the federal
government. Therefore, the mortgage loan operations of these
institutions are at a competitive advantage to us since they do
not have to comply with many of these laws.
Our goal is to avoid originating loans that meet or exceed the
APR or points and fees threshold of these laws,
rules and regulations except in the relatively small number of
states in which the laws, rules and regulations relating to APR
and points and fees thresholds allow, in our
judgment, these loans to be made
17
within our strict legal compliance standards and without undue
risk relative to litigation or to the enforcement of the loan
according to its terms. If we elect to relax our self-imposed
restrictions on originating loans subject to these laws, rules
and regulations, we will be subject to greater risks for actual
or perceived non-compliance with the laws, rules and
regulations, including demands for indemnification or loan
repurchases from the parties to whom we broker or sell loans,
class action lawsuits, increased defenses to foreclosure of
individual loans in default, individual claims for significant
monetary damages and administrative enforcement actions. Any of
the foregoing could significantly harm our business, cash flow,
financial condition, liquidity and results of operations.
|
|
|
Compliance with the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and
proposed and recently enacted changes in securities laws and
regulations are likely to increase our costs. |
The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and rules and regulations
promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission and the
New York Stock Exchange have increased the scope, complexity and
cost of corporate governance, reporting and disclosure
practices. These rules and regulations could also make it more
difficult for us to attract and retain qualified executive
officers and members of our board of directors, particularly to
serve on our audit committee.
|
|
|
We are exposed to environmental liabilities with respect
to properties to which we take title. |
In the course of our business, we may foreclose and take title
to residential properties securing our mortgage loans, and, if
we do take title, we could be subject to environmental
liabilities with respect to these properties. In such a
circumstance, we may be held liable to a governmental entity or
to third parties for property damage, personal injury,
investigation and clean-up costs incurred by these parties in
connection with environmental contamination, or we may be
required to investigate or clean up hazardous or toxic
substances or chemical releases at a property. The costs
associated with investigation or remediation activities could be
substantial. If we become subject to significant environmental
liabilities, our business, financial condition, liquidity and
results of operations could be materially and adversely affected.
Risks Related to this Offering
|
|
|
Our common stock trades in a limited market which could
hinder your ability to sell our stock. |
Our equity market capitalization places us at the low end of
market capitalization among all public REITs. Our common stock
has limited trading volume, and many investors may not be
interested in owning our common stock because of the inability
to acquire or sell a substantial block of our common stock at
one time. This illiquidity could have an adverse effect on the
market price of our common stock. In addition, a stockholder may
not be able to borrow funds using our common stock as collateral
because lenders may be unwilling to accept the pledge of
securities having such a limited market. A substantial sale, or
series of sales, of our common stock could have a material
adverse effect on the market price of our common stock.
|
|
|
Our stock price and trading volume may be volatile, which
could result in substantial losses for our stockholders. |
Subsequent to this offering, the market price of our common
stock may become highly volatile and subject to wide
fluctuations. In addition, the trading volume in our common
stock may fluctuate and cause significant price variations to
occur. If the market price of our common stock declines
significantly, you may be unable to sell your common stock at or
above the public offering price. We cannot assure you that the
market price of our common stock will not fluctuate or decline
significantly, including a decline below the public offering
price. Some of the factors that could negatively affect our
share price or result in fluctuations in the price or trading
volume of our common stock include:
|
|
|
|
|
actual or anticipated changes in our future financial
performance; |
|
|
|
changes in financial estimates by securities analysts; |
18
|
|
|
|
|
changes in market interest rates; |
|
|
|
competitive developments, including announcements by us or our
competitors of new products or services or significant
contracts, acquisitions, strategic partnerships or capital
commitments; |
|
|
|
the operations and stock performance of our competitors; |
|
|
|
developments in the mortgage lending industry or the financial
services sector generally; |
|
|
|
the impact of new state or federal legislation or court
decisions restricting the activities of lenders or suppliers of
credit in our market; |
|
|
|
fluctuations in our quarterly operating results; |
|
|
|
additions or departures of senior management and key personnel; |
|
|
|
actions by institutional stockholders; |
|
|
|
speculation in the press or investment community; and |
|
|
|
general market and economic conditions. |
If the market price of our common stock declines, you may be
unable to sell your common stock at or above the public offering
price. We cannot assure you that the market price of our common
stock will not fluctuate or decline significantly, including a
decline below the public offering price, in the future. In
addition, the stock market in general can experience
considerable price and volume fluctuations.
|
|
|
We have not established a minimum dividend payment level
and we may not have the ability to pay dividends to you in the
future. |
We have paid quarterly dividends for each of the full fiscal
quarters following the quarter in which we went public and
intend to continue to pay dividends to our stockholders of all
or substantially all of our REIT taxable income in each year. We
have not established a minimum dividend payment level and our
ability to pay dividends may be adversely affected by the risk
factors described in this prospectus. In addition, some of our
distributions may include a return of capital. All dividends
will be made at the discretion of our board of directors and
will depend on our earnings, our financial condition,
maintenance of our REIT status and other factors as our board of
directors may deem relevant from time to time. We cannot predict
our ability to pay dividends to you in the future.
|
|
|
Future sales of shares of our common stock, including
sales by our insiders, may depress the price of our common
stock. |
Any sales of a substantial number of shares of our common stock,
or the perception that those sales might occur, may cause the
market price of our common stock to decline. We are unable to
predict whether significant numbers of shares will be sold in
the open market in anticipation of or following a sale by our
insiders.
|
|
|
Our board of directors may authorize the issuance of
additional shares of our stock that may cause dilution. |
Our charter authorizes our board of directors, without your
approval, to:
|
|
|
|
|
authorize the issuance of additional common or preferred stock
in connection with future equity offerings, acquisitions of
securities or other assets of companies; and |
|
|
|
classify or reclassify any unissued common stock or preferred
stock and to set the preferences, rights and other terms of the
classified or reclassified shares, including the issuance of
shares of preferred stock that have preference rights over the
common stock with respect to dividends, liquidation, voting and
other matters or shares of common stock having special voting
rights. |
The issuance of additional shares of our stock could be
substantially dilutive to your shares. Additionally, as
permitted by the Maryland General Corporation Law, our charter
contains a provision permitting our board
19
of directors, without any action by our stockholders, to amend
our charter to increase the aggregate number of shares of stock
or the number of shares of stock of any class or series that we
have authority to issue.
|
|
|
Future offerings of debt securities, which would be senior
to our common stock in liquidation, or equity securities, which
would dilute our existing stockholders and may be senior to our
common stock for the purposes of distributions, may harm the
value of our common stock. |
In the future, we may attempt to increase our capital resources
by making additional offerings of debt or equity securities,
including commercial paper, medium-term notes, senior or
subordinated notes, preferred stock or common stock. If we were
to liquidate, holders of our debt securities and shares of
preferred stock and lenders with respect to other borrowings
would receive a distribution of our available assets before the
holders of our common stock. Additional equity offerings by us
may dilute your interest in us or reduce the value of your
shares of common stock, or both. Our preferred stock, if issued,
could have a preference on distribution payments that could
limit our ability to make a distribution to you. Because our
decision to issue securities in any future offering will depend
on market conditions and other factors beyond our control, we
cannot predict or estimate the amount, timing or nature of our
future offerings. Further, market conditions could require us to
accept less favorable terms for the issuance of our securities
in the future. Thus, you will bear the risk of our future
offerings reducing the value of your shares of common stock and
diluting your interest in us.
|
|
|
If you purchase shares of our common stock in this
offering, you will experience immediate and substantial
dilution. |
We expect the offering price of our common stock to be higher
than the book value per share of our common stock immediately
following the offering. Accordingly, if you purchase common
stock in this offering, you will experience immediate dilution
of approximately
$ in
net tangible book value per share following this offering. This
means that investors who purchase shares of our common stock in
this offering will likely pay a price per share that exceeds our
net book value following this offering.
Moreover, to the extent that we issue options or warrants to
purchase our common stock in the future and those options or
warrants are exercised, you may experience further dilution.
Tax Risks Related to Our Business and Structure
|
|
|
Failure to qualify as a REIT would adversely affect our
operations and ability to make distributions. |
We intend to qualify and elect to be taxed as a REIT for federal
income tax purposes. Our future qualification as a REIT will
depend on our ability to meet various requirements concerning,
among other things, the ownership of our outstanding stock, the
nature of our assets, the sources of our income, and the amount
of our distributions to our stockholders. See Federal
Income Tax Consequences of Our Status as a REIT
Taxation of Our Company.
If we fail to qualify as a REIT in any taxable year, we would be
subject to federal income tax (including any applicable
alternative minimum tax) on our taxable income at regular
corporate rates. In addition, if we do not qualify for certain
statutory relief provisions we generally would be disqualified
from treatment as a REIT for the four taxable years following
the year in which we lost our REIT status. Failing to obtain, or
losing, our REIT status would reduce our net earnings available
for investment or distribution to stockholders because of the
additional tax liability, and we would no longer be required to
make distributions to stockholders. Additionally, we might be
required to borrow funds or liquidate some investments in order
to pay the applicable tax.
|
|
|
REIT distribution requirements could adversely affect our
liquidity. |
In order to qualify as a REIT, we generally are required each
year to distribute to our stockholders at least 90% of our REIT
taxable income, excluding any net capital gain. To the extent
that we distribute at least 90%, but less than 100% of our REIT
taxable income, we will be subject to corporate income tax on
our undistributed REIT taxable income. In addition, we will be
subject to a 4% nondeductible excise tax on the
20
amount, if any, by which certain distributions paid by us with
respect to any calendar year are less than the sum of
(i) 85% of our ordinary REIT income for that year,
(ii) 95% of our REIT capital gain net income for that year,
and (iii) 100% of our undistributed REIT taxable income
from prior years.
We have made and intend to continue to make distributions to our
stockholders to comply with the 90% distribution requirement and
to avoid corporate income tax and the nondeductible excise tax.
However, differences in timing between the recognition of REIT
taxable income and the actual receipt of cash could require us
to sell assets or to borrow funds on a short-term basis to meet
the 90% distribution requirement and to avoid corporate income
tax and the nondeductible excise tax.
Certain of our assets may generate substantial mismatches
between REIT taxable income and available cash. Such assets
could include mortgage-backed securities we hold that have been
issued at a discount and require the accrual of taxable income
in advance of the receipt of cash. As a result, our taxable
income may exceed our cash available for distribution and the
requirement to distribute a substantial portion of our net
taxable income could cause us to:
|
|
|
|
|
sell assets in adverse market conditions, |
|
|
|
borrow on unfavorable terms or |
|
|
|
distribute amounts that would otherwise be invested in future
acquisitions, capital expenditures or repayment of debt |
in order to comply with the REIT distribution requirements.
Further, amounts distributed will not be available to fund
investment activities. We expect to fund our investments,
initially, by raising capital in this offering and,
subsequently, through borrowings from financial institutions,
along with securitization financings. If we fail to obtain debt
or equity capital in the future, it could limit our ability to
grow, which could have a material adverse effect on the value of
our common stock.
|
|
|
Changes in taxation of corporate dividends may adversely
affect the value of our common stock. |
The Jobs and Growth Tax Relief Reconciliation Act of 2003, which
was signed into law on May 28, 2003, among other things,
generally reduced to 15% the maximum marginal rate of tax
payable by domestic noncorporate taxpayers on dividends received
from a regular subchapter C corporation. This reduced tax
rate, however, generally does not apply to dividends paid to
domestic noncorporate taxpayers by a REIT on its stock, except
for certain limited amounts. Although the earnings of a REIT
that are distributed to its stockholders generally are subject
to less total federal income taxation than earnings of a
non-REIT subchapter C corporation that are distributed to its
stockholders net of corporate-level income tax, this legislation
could cause domestic noncorporate investors to view the stock of
non-REIT subchapter C corporations as more attractive relative
to the stock of a REIT than was the case prior to the enactment
of the legislation, because dividends from non-REIT subchapter C
corporations generally are now taxed at a lower rate to the
investor while dividends from REITs generally are taxed at the
same rate as the investors other ordinary income. We
cannot predict what effect, if any, the enactment of this
legislation may have on the value of the stock of REITs in
general or on our common stock in particular, either in terms of
absolute price or relative to other investments.
Risks Related to Our Company, Structure and Change in Control
Provisions
|
|
|
Maintenance of our Investment Company Act exemption
imposes limits on our operations. |
We have conducted and intend to continue to conduct our
operations so as not to become regulated as an investment
company under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended. We
believe that there are a number of exemptions under the
Investment Company Act that are applicable to us. To maintain
exemption, the assets that we acquire are limited by the
provisions of the Investment Company Act and the rules and
regulations promulgated under the Investment Company Act. In
addition, we could, among other things, be required either
(a) to change the manner in which we conduct our operations
to avoid being required to
21
register as an investment company or (b) to register as an
investment company, either of which could have an adverse effect
on our operations and the market price for our common stock.
|
|
|
The stock ownership limit imposed by our charter may
inhibit market activity in our stock and may restrict our
business combination opportunities. |
In order for us to maintain our qualification as a REIT under
the Internal Revenue Code, not more than 50% in value of the
issued and outstanding shares of our stock may be owned,
actually or constructively, by five or fewer individuals (as
defined in the Internal Revenue Code to include certain
entities) at any time during the last half of each taxable year.
Attribution rules in the Internal Revenue Code apply to
determine if any individual or entity actually or constructively
owns our stock for purposes of this requirement. Additionally,
at least 100 persons must beneficially own our stock during at
least 335 days of each taxable year. To help ensure that we
meet these tests, our charter restricts the acquisition and
ownership of shares of our stock. Our charter, with certain
exceptions, authorizes our directors to take such actions as are
necessary and desirable to preserve our qualification as a REIT
and provides that, unless exempted by our board of directors, no
person other than Mr. Schnall may own more than 9.4% in
value of the outstanding shares of our capital stock. Our
charter provides that Mr. Schnall may own up to 12.0% of
our outstanding common stock. Our board of directors may grant
an exemption from that ownership limit in its sole discretion,
subject to such conditions, representations and undertakings as
it may determine. This ownership limit could delay or prevent a
transaction or a change in our control that might involve a
premium price for our common stock or otherwise be in the best
interest of our stockholders.
|
|
|
Our executive officers have agreements that provide them
with benefits in the event their employment is terminated
following a change in control. |
We have entered into agreements with the members of our senior
management team, Messrs. Schnall, Akre, Redlingshafer,
Fierro, Wirth and Mumma, that provide them with severance
benefits if their employment ends under specified circumstances
following a change in control. These benefits could increase the
cost to a potential acquirer of us and thereby prevent or
discourage a change in control that might involve a premium
price for your shares or otherwise be in your best interest.
|
|
|
Certain provisions of Maryland law and our charter and
bylaws could hinder, delay or prevent a change in control which
could have an adverse effect on the value of our common
stock. |
Certain provisions of Maryland law, our charter and our bylaws
may have the effect of discouraging, delaying or preventing
transactions that involve an actual or threatened change in
control. These provisions include the following:
|
|
|
Removal of Directors. Under our charter, subject to the
rights of one or more classes or series of preferred stock to
elect one or more directors, a director may be removed with or
without cause only by the affirmative vote of the holders of at
least two-thirds of all votes entitled to be cast by our
stockholders generally in the election of directors. |
|
|
Classified Board of Directors. Although currently all
members of our board of directors will be subject to election or
re-election at each annual meeting of stockholders, Maryland law
permits our board of directors, without stockholder approval and
regardless of what is provided in our charter or bylaws, to
divide the members of our board of directors into up to three
classes with only one class standing for election in any year. |
|
|
Board Vacancies. We have elected to be subject to certain
provisions of Maryland law that vest in the board of directors
the exclusive right, by the affirmative vote of the majority of
the remaining directors, to fill vacancies on the board
resulting from any reason, even if the remaining directors do
not constitute a quorum. A vacancy must be filled for the
remainder of the term in which the vacancy occurred. |
22
|
|
|
Limitation on Stockholder-Requested Special Meetings. Our
bylaws provide that our secretary must call a special meeting of
stockholders only upon the written request of stockholders
entitled to cast not less than a majority of all the votes
entitled to be cast by the stockholders at such meeting. |
|
|
Advance Notice Provisions for Stockholder Nominations and
Proposals. Generally, our bylaws require advance written
notice for stockholders to nominate persons for election as
directors at, or to bring other business before, meetings of
stockholders. This bylaw provision limits the ability of
stockholders to make nominations of persons for election as
directors or to introduce other proposals unless we are notified
in a timely manner prior to the meeting. |
|
|
Preferred Stock. Under our charter, our board of
directors has authority to issue preferred stock from time to
time in one or more series and to establish the terms,
preferences and rights of any such series of preferred stock,
all without the approval of our stockholders. |
|
|
Maryland Business Combination Act. The Maryland Business
Combination Act provides that unless exempted, a Maryland
corporation may not engage in business combinations, including
mergers, dispositions of 10% or more of its assets, issuance of
shares of stock and other specified transactions, with an
interested stockholder or an affiliate of an
interested stockholder for five years after the most recent date
on which the interested stockholder became an interested
stockholder, and thereafter unless specified criteria are met.
An interested stockholder is generally a person owning or
controlling, directly or indirectly, 10% or more of the voting
power of the outstanding voting stock of a Maryland corporation.
Our board of directors has adopted a resolution exempting us
from application of this statute. However, our board of
directors may repeal or modify this resolution in the future, in
which case the provisions of the Maryland Business Combination
Act will be applicable to business combinations between us and
other persons. |
|
|
Maryland Control Share Acquisition Act. Maryland law
provides that control shares of a Maryland
corporation acquired in a control share acquisition
shall have no voting rights except to the extent approved by a
vote of two-thirds of the votes eligible to be cast on the
matter under the Maryland Control Share Acquisition Act. Shares
owned by an acquiror, by officers or by directors who are
employees of the corporation are excluded from shares entitled
to vote on the matter. Control shares means voting
shares of stock that, if aggregated with all other shares of
stock previously acquired by the acquiror or in respect of which
the acquiror is able to exercise or direct the exercise of
voting power (except solely by virtue of a revocable proxy),
would entitle the acquiror to exercise voting power in electing
directors within one of the following ranges of voting power:
one-tenth or more but less than one-third, one-third or more but
less than a majority or a majority or more of all voting power.
Control shares do not include shares the acquiring person is
then entitled to vote as a result of having previously obtained
stockholder approval. A control share acquisition
means an acquisition of control shares, subject to certain
exceptions. A person who has made or proposes to make a control
share acquisition may compel the board of directors of the
corporation to call a special meeting of stockholders to be held
within 50 days of demand to consider the voting rights of
the shares. The right to compel the calling of a special meeting
is subject to the satisfaction of certain conditions, including
an undertaking to pay the expenses of the meeting. If no request
for a meeting is made, the corporation may itself present the
question at any stockholders meeting. If voting rights of
control shares acquired in a control share acquisition are not
approved at a stockholders meeting or if the acquiring
person does not deliver an acquiring person statement as
required by the statute, then subject to certain conditions and
limitations, the corporation may redeem any or all of the
control shares for fair value. If voting rights of control
shares are approved at a stockholders meeting and the
acquiror becomes entitled to vote a majority of the shares of
stock entitled to vote, all other stockholders may exercise
appraisal rights. The fair value of the shares as determined for
purposes of appraisal rights may not be less than the highest
price per share paid by the acquiror in the control share
acquisition. The control share acquisition statute does not
apply (a) to shares acquired in a merger, consolidation or
share exchange if the corporation is a party to the transaction,
or (b) to acquisitions approved or exempted by the charter
or bylaws of the corporation. Our bylaws contain a provision
exempting any and all acquisitions by any person of our shares
from the Maryland Control Share Acquisition Act. However, our
board of directors may amend our bylaws in the |
23
|
|
|
future to repeal or modify this exemption, in which case any
control shares of our company acquired in a control share
acquisition would be subject to the Maryland Control Share
Acquisition Act. |
SPECIAL NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
Some of the statements under Summary, Risk
Factors, Dividend Policy and Distributions,
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations, Our
Company and elsewhere in this prospectus constitute
forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements relate to
expectations, beliefs, projections, future plans and strategies,
anticipated events or trends and similar expressions concerning
matters that are not historical facts. In some cases, you can
identify forward-looking statements by terms such as
anticipate, believe, could,
estimate, expect, intend,
may, plan, potential,
should, will and would or
the negative of these terms or other comparable terminology.
The forward-looking statements are based on our beliefs,
assumptions and expectations of our future performance, taking
into account all information currently available to us. These
beliefs, assumptions and expectations can change as a result of
many possible events or factors, not all of which are known to
us or are within our control. If a change occurs, our business,
financial condition, liquidity and results of operations may
vary materially from those expressed in our forward-looking
statements. You should carefully consider the following risks
before you make an investment in our common stock:
|
|
|
|
|
the factors referenced in this prospectus, including those set
forth under the sections captioned Risk Factors,
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations and Our
Company; |
|
|
|
general volatility of the capital markets and the market price
of our common stock; |
|
|
|
changes in our business strategy; |
|
|
|
availability, terms and deployment of capital; |
|
|
|
availability of qualified personnel; and |
|
|
|
changes in our industry, interest rates or the general economy. |
Although we believe that the expectations reflected in the
forward-looking statements are reasonable, we cannot guarantee
future results, levels of activity, performance or achievements.
You should not place undue reliance on these forward-looking
statements, which apply only as of the date of this prospectus.
MARKET DATA
Market data and forecasts used in this prospectus have been
obtained from independent industry sources as well as from
research reports prepared for other purposes. We have not
independently verified the data obtained from these sources and
we cannot assure you of the accuracy or completeness of the
data. Forecasts and other forward-looking information obtained
from these sources are subject to the same qualifications and
uncertainties as the other forward-looking statements in this
prospectus.
24
USE OF PROCEEDS
We estimate that the net proceeds of this offering will be
approximately $53.9 million, based on the public offering
price of
$ per
share, and after deducting the underwriting discount and
estimated offering expenses payable by us. If the underwriters
exercise in full their option to purchase up to an additional
900,000 shares of our common stock in this offering, our
net proceeds will be approximately $62.0 million. We intend
to use the net proceeds of this offering to invest, on a
leveraged basis, in AAA-rated or Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac
guaranteed residential mortgage-backed securities for our
investment portfolio.
We may need a significant amount of time to fully invest the
available net proceeds of this offering in our intended
investments and to fully implement our leveraging strategy to
increase the total amount of our investments to our desired
level. In the meantime, funds will be committed to
interest-bearing short-term investment grade securities which
are consistent with our REIT qualification. We will not leverage
our temporary investment in these securities. These investments
are expected to provide a lower net return than we hope to
achieve from our intended use of the proceeds of this offering.
DISTRIBUTIONS AND PRICE RANGE OF OUR SHARES OF COMMON
STOCK
Our common stock trades on the New York Stock Exchange under the
symbol NTR. As of April 15, 2005, there were
17,797,375 shares of our common stock outstanding held by
2,943 stockholders of record. We declared a dividend of $0.25
per share for the quarter ended June 30, 2005, payable on
July 26, 2005 to stockholders of record as of June 14,
2005. The following table sets forth the high and low sale
prices of our common stock as reported by the New York
Stock Exchange and the distributions declared on our common
stock for the periods indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock Prices | |
|
Cash Dividends | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paid or | |
|
Amount | |
|
|
High | |
|
Low | |
|
Close | |
|
Declared | |
|
Payable | |
|
per Share | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Quarter Ended March 31, 2005
|
|
$ |
11.30 |
|
|
$ |
9.90 |
|
|
$ |
10.22 |
|
|
|
3/10/05 |
|
|
|
4/26/05 |
|
|
$ |
0.25 |
|
Year Ended December 31, 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fourth quarter
|
|
$ |
11.34 |
|
|
$ |
8.90 |
|
|
$ |
11.20 |
|
|
|
12/16/04 |
|
|
|
1/26/05 |
|
|
$ |
0.24 |
|
Third quarter
|
|
|
9.90 |
|
|
|
8.55 |
|
|
|
9.35 |
|
|
|
9/16/04 |
|
|
|
10/26/04 |
|
|
$ |
0.16 |
|
Second quarter
|
|
|
9.15 |
|
|
|
8.69 |
|
|
|
8.86 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
|
|
(1) |
|
|
|
(1) |
|
|
(1) |
We closed our IPO on June 29, 2004. As a result, no
dividend for the two days of the quarter ended June 30,
2004 was declared or paid. |
We intend to make regular quarterly distributions to our
stockholders so that we distribute each year all or
substantially all of our REIT taxable income so as to avoid
paying corporate level income tax and excise tax on our earnings
and to qualify for the tax benefits accorded to REITs under the
Internal Revenue Code. In order to qualify as a REIT, we must
distribute to our stockholders at least 90% of our REIT
taxable income each year. To the extent that we distribute at
least 90%, but less than 100% of our REIT taxable income,
we will be subject to corporate income tax on our undistributed
taxable income. In addition, we will be subject to a
4% nondeductible excise tax on the amount, if any, by which
certain distributions paid by us with respect to any calendar
year are less than the sum of:
|
|
|
|
|
85% of our ordinary REIT income for that year; |
|
|
|
95% of our capital gain net income for that year; and |
|
|
|
100% of our undistributed REIT taxable income from prior years. |
25
Our REIT taxable income may exceed our cash available for
distribution and the requirement to distribute a substantial
portion of our net taxable income could cause us to:
|
|
|
|
|
sell assets in adverse market conditions; |
|
|
|
borrow on unfavorable terms; or |
|
|
|
distribute amounts that would otherwise be invested in future
acquisitions, capital expenditures or repayment of debt |
in order to comply with the REIT distribution requirements.
Any distributions we make will be at the discretion of our board
of directors and will depend upon a number of factors, including:
|
|
|
|
|
our results of operations; |
|
|
|
the timing of interest and principal we receive from our loans
and securities; |
|
|
|
our obligation to pay debt service on our borrowings; |
|
|
|
the annual distribution requirements under the REIT provisions
of the Internal Revenue Code; and |
|
|
|
other factors that our board of directors deems relevant. |
We may, under certain circumstances, make a distribution of
capital or of assets. These distributions, if any, will be made
at the discretion of our board of directors. Distributions will
be made in cash to the extent that cash is available for
distribution.
Our distributions generally are taxable as ordinary income to
our stockholders, although a portion of our distributions may be
designated by us as long-term capital gain or may constitute a
return of capital. Distributions to our stockholders are treated
as dividends to the extent that we have current or accumulated
earnings and profits. We furnish annually to each of our
stockholders a statement setting forth distributions paid during
the preceding year and their federal income tax status. For a
discussion of the federal income tax treatment of distributions
by us, see Federal Income Tax Consequences of Our Status
as a REIT Requirements for Qualification
Distribution Requirements.
Our ability to pay dividends to you will depend primarily on our
receipt of interest and principal payments from our loans and
mortgage-backed securities and any distributions we receive from
NYMC. As a taxable REIT subsidiary, NYMC will be subject to
regular corporate income tax on the taxable income that it
generates. We may cause NYMC to retain after-tax earnings or
distribute all or a portion of its after-tax earnings to us to
the extent allowable under the REIT provisions of the Internal
Revenue Code. If NYMC distributes any of its after-tax earnings
to us, we will include that distributed amount in the dividends
we pay to our stockholders and, for domestic non-corporate
taxpayers, that portion of our dividends, unlike distributions
of our REIT taxable income, generally will be eligible to be
taxed at the current 15% maximum marginal rate for corporate
dividends. See Federal Income Tax Consequences of Our
Status as a REIT Taxation of Taxable
U.S. Stockholders. All distributions must be
authorized by our board of directors and declared by us out of
assets legally available therefor.
If we are unable to successfully execute our business plan, we
may not have cash available to pay dividends.
In the future, our board of directors may elect to adopt a
dividend reinvestment plan.
26
CAPITALIZATION
The following table sets forth:
|
|
|
|
|
our actual capitalization as of March 31, 2005; and |
|
|
|
our capitalization as of March 31, 2005, as adjusted to
reflect completion of this offering and application of the net
proceeds as described under Use of Proceeds. |
This table should be read in conjunction with the section
entitled Managements Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations beginning on
page 30 and the financial statements and related notes
included elsewhere in this prospectus.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
Actual | |
|
As Adjusted | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Debt:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financing arrangements and subordinated debentures
|
|
$ |
1,720,305,999 |
|
|
$ |
1,720,305,999 |
|
Stockholders equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $0.01 par value per share,
400,000,000 shares authorized, and 18,114,445 shares
issued and 17,797,375 outstanding at March 31, 2005, actual
and 23,797,375 shares outstanding, as adjusted(1)
|
|
|
180,621 |
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, $0.01 par value per share, 200,000,000 shares
authorized, and no shares issued and outstanding actual and as
adjusted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
115,485,603 |
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
|
|
|
(1,008,045 |
) |
|
|
(1,008,045 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity
|
|
|
114,658,179 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total capitalization
|
|
$ |
1,834,964,178 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
Excludes (i) 176,500 shares currently reserved for
issuance upon exercise of outstanding options to purchase shares
of our common stock and (ii) 900,000 shares of common
stock issuable upon exercise of the underwriters
over-allotment option. |
27
DILUTION
Dilution After This Offering
Dilution in net tangible book value per share represents the
difference between the amount per share paid by purchasers of
our common stock in this offering and the net tangible book
value per share of common stock immediately after this offering.
Net tangible book value per share represents the amount of our
total tangible assets less our total liabilities, divided by the
number of outstanding shares of our common stock.
Our net tangible book value as of March 31, 2005, was
$114.7 million, or $6.33 per share of common stock.
Our pro forma net tangible book value as of March 31, 2005,
after giving effect to this offering, would have been
approximately
$ million,
or
$ per
share of common stock. This amount represents an immediate
dilution in pro forma net tangible book value of
$ per
share of common stock to new investors. The following table
illustrates this dilution.
|
|
|
|
|
Public offering price
|
|
$ |
|
|
Net tangible book value per share as of March 31, 2005
|
|
$ |
|
|
Pro forma net tangible book value per share after this offering
|
|
$ |
|
|
Dilution per share to new investors
|
|
$ |
|
|
28
SELECTED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL AND OTHER DATA
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended | |
|
|
|
|
March 31, | |
|
For the Year Ended December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
2001 | |
|
2000 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts) | |
Operating Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gains on sales of mortgage loans
|
|
$ |
4,321 |
|
|
$ |
3,506 |
|
|
$ |
20,835 |
|
|
$ |
23,031 |
|
|
$ |
9,858 |
|
|
$ |
6,429 |
|
|
$ |
3,336 |
|
Interest income
|
|
|
17,116 |
|
|
|
1,261 |
|
|
|
27,298 |
|
|
|
7,610 |
|
|
|
2,986 |
|
|
|
1,570 |
|
|
|
625 |
|
Brokered loan fees
|
|
|
2,000 |
|
|
|
2,183 |
|
|
|
6,895 |
|
|
|
6,682 |
|
|
|
5,241 |
|
|
|
3,749 |
|
|
|
4,317 |
|
Gain on sale of marketable securities
|
|
|
377 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
774 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Miscellaneous
|
|
|
114 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
227 |
|
|
|
45 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
48 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue
|
|
|
23,928 |
|
|
|
6,966 |
|
|
|
56,029 |
|
|
|
37,368 |
|
|
|
18,100 |
|
|
|
11,796 |
|
|
|
8,298 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Salaries, commissions, and benefits
|
|
|
7,143 |
|
|
|
2,719 |
|
|
|
17,118 |
|
|
|
9,247 |
|
|
|
5,788 |
|
|
|
3,644 |
|
|
|
2,891 |
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
11,690 |
|
|
|
609 |
|
|
|
16,013 |
|
|
|
3,266 |
|
|
|
1,673 |
|
|
|
1,289 |
|
|
|
476 |
|
Brokered loan expenses
|
|
|
1,519 |
|
|
|
1,284 |
|
|
|
5,276 |
|
|
|
3,734 |
|
|
|
2,992 |
|
|
|
2,174 |
|
|
|
2,235 |
|
General and administrative expenses
|
|
|
6,304 |
|
|
|
2,236 |
|
|
|
13,935 |
|
|
|
7,395 |
|
|
|
3,897 |
|
|
|
2,808 |
|
|
|
2,169 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total expenses
|
|
|
26,656 |
|
|
|
6,848 |
|
|
|
52,342 |
|
|
|
23,642 |
|
|
|
14,350 |
|
|
|
9,915 |
|
|
|
7,771 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income tax benefit
|
|
|
(2,728 |
) |
|
|
118 |
|
|
|
3,687 |
|
|
|
13,726 |
|
|
|
3,750 |
|
|
|
1,881 |
|
|
|
527 |
|
Income tax benefit
|
|
|
2,690 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,260 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$ |
(38 |
) |
|
$ |
118 |
|
|
$ |
4,947 |
|
|
$ |
13,726 |
|
|
$ |
3,750 |
|
|
$ |
1,881 |
|
|
$ |
527 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic income per share
|
|
$ |
0.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
0.28 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted income per share
|
|
|
0.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
0.27 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance Sheet Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$ |
7,322 |
|
|
$ |
4,523 |
|
|
$ |
7,613 |
|
|
$ |
4,047 |
|
|
$ |
2,746 |
|
|
$ |
1,549 |
|
|
$ |
52 |
|
Investment securities available for sale
|
|
|
1,112,990 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,204,745 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage loans held for investment
|
|
|
68,463 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
190,153 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage loans held in the securitization trust
|
|
|
417,383 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage loans held for sale
|
|
|
99,554 |
|
|
|
47,734 |
|
|
|
85,385 |
|
|
|
36,169 |
|
|
|
34,039 |
|
|
|
9,894 |
|
|
|
3,784 |
|
Due from loan purchasers
|
|
|
91,340 |
|
|
|
93,851 |
|
|
|
79,904 |
|
|
|
58,862 |
|
|
|
40,621 |
|
|
|
20,707 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
1,856,385 |
|
|
|
158,123 |
|
|
|
1,614,762 |
|
|
|
110,081 |
|
|
|
83,004 |
|
|
|
34,561 |
|
|
|
12,592 |
|
Financing arrangements
|
|
|
1,695,306 |
|
|
|
136,134 |
|
|
|
1,475,012 |
|
|
|
90,425 |
|
|
|
73,016 |
|
|
|
29,705 |
|
|
|
10,050 |
|
Subordinated debentures notes
|
|
|
25,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,707 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
1,741,727 |
|
|
|
157,713 |
|
|
|
1,495,280 |
|
|
|
110,555 |
|
|
|
76,504 |
|
|
|
30,891 |
|
|
|
10,538 |
|
Equity (deficit)
|
|
|
114,658 |
|
|
|
410 |
|
|
|
119,482 |
|
|
|
(474 |
) |
|
|
6,500 |
|
|
|
3,670 |
|
|
|
2,054 |
|
Other Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase originations
|
|
$ |
380,900 |
|
|
$ |
169,305 |
|
|
$ |
1,089,499 |
|
|
$ |
803,446 |
|
|
$ |
469,404 |
|
|
$ |
374,454 |
|
|
$ |
352,634 |
|
Refinancing originations
|
|
|
291,600 |
|
|
|
114,146 |
|
|
|
756,006 |
|
|
|
796,879 |
|
|
|
407,827 |
|
|
|
209,748 |
|
|
|
45,753 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total originations
|
|
$ |
672,500 |
|
|
$ |
283,451 |
|
|
$ |
1,845,505 |
|
|
$ |
1,600,325 |
|
|
$ |
877,231 |
|
|
$ |
584,202 |
|
|
$ |
398,387 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed-rate originations
|
|
$ |
307,800 |
|
|
$ |
137,960 |
|
|
$ |
878,749 |
|
|
$ |
890,172 |
|
|
$ |
518,382 |
|
|
$ |
398,056 |
|
|
$ |
191,981 |
|
Adjustable-rate originations
|
|
|
364,700 |
|
|
|
145,491 |
|
|
|
966,756 |
|
|
|
710,153 |
|
|
|
358,849 |
|
|
|
186,146 |
|
|
|
206,406 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total originations
|
|
$ |
672,500 |
|
|
$ |
283,451 |
|
|
$ |
1,845,505 |
|
|
$ |
1,600,325 |
|
|
$ |
877,231 |
|
|
$ |
584,202 |
|
|
$ |
398,387 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average middle credit score non- FHA(2)
|
|
|
712 |
|
|
|
703 |
|
|
|
715 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average middle credit score all originations
|
|
|
705 |
|
|
|
703 |
|
|
|
703 |
|
|
|
719 |
|
|
|
716 |
|
|
|
713 |
|
|
|
714 |
|
Total mortgage sales ($000)
|
|
$ |
426,768 |
|
|
$ |
199,358 |
|
|
$ |
1,435,340 |
|
|
$ |
1,234,848 |
|
|
$ |
633,223 |
|
|
$ |
404,470 |
|
|
$ |
170,574 |
|
Brokered originations ($000)
|
|
$ |
109,379 |
|
|
$ |
84,093 |
|
|
$ |
410,052 |
|
|
$ |
365,477 |
|
|
$ |
244,008 |
|
|
$ |
179,732 |
|
|
$ |
209,345 |
|
Origination retained in investment portfolio
|
|
$ |
136,393 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Weighted average whole loan sales price over par
|
|
|
1.76 |
% |
|
|
2.13 |
% |
|
|
2.02 |
% |
|
|
1.75 |
% |
|
|
1.52 |
% |
|
|
1.37 |
% |
|
|
1.27 |
% |
Salaries, general and administrative expense as a percentage of
total loans originated
|
|
|
1.99 |
% |
|
|
1.70 |
% |
|
|
1.68 |
% |
|
|
1.04 |
% |
|
|
1.10 |
% |
|
|
1.10 |
% |
|
|
1.27 |
% |
Yield on investment securities available for sale
|
|
|
3.89 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.89 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yield on loans held for investment
|
|
|
4.44 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.09 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of funds (including hedges)
|
|
|
2.86 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.47 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest spread
|
|
|
1.15 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.43 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of locations at period end
|
|
|
63 |
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
66 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
Number of employees at period end
|
|
|
810 |
|
|
|
447 |
|
|
|
782 |
|
|
|
335 |
|
|
|
184 |
|
|
|
147 |
|
|
|
117 |
|
Dividends declared per common share
|
|
$ |
0.25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
0.40 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
For the year ended December 31, 2003, represents
subordinated notes due to members of our predecessor. |
|
(2) |
Beginning near the end of the first quarter of 2004, our volume
of FHA loans increased; prior to such time the volume of FHA
loan originations was immaterial. Generally, FHA loans have
lower average balances and FICO scores. All FHA loans are
currently and will be in the future sold or brokered to third
parties. |
29
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The following should be read in conjunction with our financial
statements and notes thereto contained elsewhere in this
prospectus.
General
We are a fully integrated, self-advised residential mortgage
banking company that originates, acquires and retains, sells and
securitizes mortgage assets. We intend to elect to be taxed as a
REIT commencing with our taxable year ended December 31,
2004, upon filing our federal income tax return for that year.
Our wholly-owned taxable REIT subsidiary, The New York Mortgage
Company, LLC, or NYMC, originates mortgage loans of all types,
with a particular focus on prime adjustable- and fixed-rate,
first lien, residential purchase mortgage loans. Prior to the
simultaneous completion of our acquisition of NYMC and our
initial public offering, or IPO, NYMC sold all of the loans it
originated to third parties, and brokered loans to other
mortgage lenders prior to funding. NYMC, which originates
residential mortgage loans through a network of 31 full service
branch loan origination locations and 32 satellite loan
origination locations, is presently licensed or authorized to do
business in 40 states and the District of Columbia. On
June 29, 2004, we closed our IPO, selling 15 million
shares of our common stock at a price to the public of
$9.00 per share and raising net proceeds of approximately
$122.0 million after deducting the underwriters
discount and other offering expenses.
Since the completion of our IPO and acquisition of NYMC, our
primary business focus has been to build a leveraged portfolio
of residential mortgage loans comprised largely of prime
adjustable-rate mortgage loans that we originate and that meet
our investment objectives and portfolio requirements, including
adjustable-rate loans that have an initial fixed-rate period,
which we refer to as hybrid mortgage loans. We used a
substantial portion of the net proceeds from our IPO to
purchase, on a leveraged basis, approximately $1.2 billion
of residential mortgage-backed securities. Over time, we expect
that these securities will be replaced by adjustable-rate and
hybrid mortgage loans that we originate, although we may
continue to purchase securities from third parties. We believe
that our ability to originate mortgage loans as the basis for
our portfolio will enable us to build a portfolio that generates
a higher return than the returns realized by mortgage investors
that do not have their own origination capabilities, because the
cost to originate and retain such mortgage loans for
securitization is generally less than the premiums paid to
purchase similar assets from third parties.
Generally, we intend to continue to sell the fixed-rate loans
that we originate to third parties, and to retain in our
portfolio and finance selected adjustable-rate and hybrid
mortgage loans that we originate. Our portfolio loans are held
at the REIT level or by New York Mortgage Funding, LLC, or NYMF,
our wholly-owned subsidiary. We continue to sell to third
parties any adjustable-rate and hybrid mortgage loans we
originate that do not meet our investment criteria or portfolio
requirements. We rely on our own underwriting criteria with
respect to the mortgage loans we retain and rely on the
underwriting criteria of the institutions to which we sell our
loans with respect to the loans we sell.
As we aggregate a large enough portfolio comprised mainly of
retained mortgage loans originated by us, we intend to
securitize such loans. We anticipate that the securitization
transactions through which we finance the adjustable-rate and
hybrid mortgage loans that we retain will be structured as
financings for both tax and financial accounting purposes.
Therefore, we do not expect to generate a gain or loss on sales
from these activities, and, following the securitizations, the
loans will remain on our consolidated balance sheet as assets
with the securitization debt recorded as a liability. Our first
securitization occurred on February 25, 2005.
We earn net interest income from purchased residential
mortgage-backed securities and adjustable-rate mortgage loans
and securities originated through NYMC. We have acquired and
will seek to acquire additional assets that will produce
competitive returns, taking into consideration the amount and
nature of the anticipated returns from the investment, our
ability to pledge the investment for secured, collateralized
borrowings and the costs associated with originating, financing,
managing, securitizing and reserving for these investments.
30
Our business is affected by a variety of economic and industry
factors which management considers. The most significant risk
factors management considers while managing the business and
which could have a material adverse effect on our financial
condition and results of operations are:
|
|
|
|
|
a decline in the market value of our assets due to rising
interest rates; |
|
|
|
increasing or decreasing levels of prepayments on the mortgages
underlying our mortgage-backed securities; |
|
|
|
an adverse impact on our earnings from a decrease in the demand
for mortgage loans due to a period of rising interest rates; |
|
|
|
our ability to originate prime adjustable-rate and hybrid
mortgage loans for our portfolio; |
|
|
|
our ability to obtain financing to fund and hold mortgage loans
prior to their sale or securitization; |
|
|
|
the overall leverage of our portfolio and the ability to obtain
financing to leverage our equity; |
|
|
|
the potential for increased borrowing costs and its impact on
net income; |
|
|
|
our ability to use hedging instruments to mitigate our interest
rate and prepayment risks; |
|
|
|
a prolonged economic slow down, a lengthy or severe recession or
declining real estate values could harm our operations; |
|
|
|
if our assets are insufficient to meet the collateral
requirements of our lenders, we might be compelled to liquidate
particular assets at inopportune times and at disadvantageous
prices; |
|
|
|
if we are disqualified as a REIT, we will be subject to tax as a
regular corporation and face substantial tax liability; and |
|
|
|
compliance with REIT requirements might cause us to forego
otherwise attractive opportunities. |
On November 15, 2004, we acquired 15 full service and 26
satellite retail mortgage banking offices located in the
Northeast and Mid-Atlantic states from Guaranty Residential
Lending, Inc. We acquired an existing pipeline of approximately
$300 million in locked and unlocked mortgage applications
in conjunction with the branch acquisition. The mortgage
pipeline and other assets (primarily furniture, fixtures and
computer hardware and software) had a purchase price of
approximately $550,000 and $760,000, respectively. In addition,
we will pay a $250,000 contingency premium to the seller
provided that the former loan officers of the seller become
employed by us and originate, close and fund $2 billion in
mortgage loans during the twelve month period after the closing
date of the transaction. We also assumed selected monthly lease
obligations of approximately $142,000 and hired approximately
275 new loan origination and support personnel. As a result
of this acquisition, our annual mortgage originations are
expected to approximately double.
Recent Developments
On February 25, 2005, we completed our first loan
securitization of approximately $419 million of high-credit
quality, first-lien, adjustable rate mortgages and hybrid
adjustable rate mortgages, which we collectively refer to as
ARM loans, through New York Mortgage
Trust 2005-1. The securitization resulted in the creation
of approximately $417 million in mortgage-backed
securities. This structured finance transaction will reduce
borrowing costs and improve liquidity of the investment
portfolio. This transaction will be accounted for as a secured
borrowing.
On March 15, 2005, we closed a private offering of
$25 million of trust preferred securities to Taberna
Preferred Funding I, Ltd., a pooled investment vehicle. The
securities were issued by NYM Preferred Trust I and are
fully guaranteed by us with respect to distributions and amounts
payable upon liquidation, redemption or repayment. These
securities have a floating interest rate resetting quarterly
equal to three-month LIBOR
31
plus 375 basis points. We have entered into an interest
rate cap instrument that limits the annual interest rate payable
to 7.5%. The securities mature on March 15, 2035 and may be
called at par by us any time after March 15, 2010.
Overview of First Quarter and Prior Year Performance
For the three months ended March 31, 2005, we reported a
net loss of approximately $38,000, as compared to net income of
$118,000 for the same period of 2004. Our revenues were driven
largely from loan originations during the period. The decline in
net income is attributed to a decrease in gain on sale revenues
as a result of decreased gain on sale margins in 2005, the
execution of our core business strategy to retain selected
originated loans in our portfolio (thus foregoing the gain on
sale premiums we would have otherwise received when such loans
are sold to third parties), and increased expenses incurred for
and subsequent to the acquisition of multiple retail loan
origination locations during 2004 and infrastructure
enhancements to accommodate increased loan origination capacity.
For the three months ended March 31, 2005, we originated
$672.5 million in residential mortgage loans as compared to
$283.5 million for the same period of 2004. The increase in
our loan origination levels for the three months ended
March 31, 2005 as compared to the same period of 2004 is
the result of the addition of sales personnel and branch offices
primarily in new and underserved markets. Total employees
increased to 810 at March 31, 2005 from 447 at
March 31, 2004. Included in the total number of employees,
the number of loan officers dedicated to originating loans
increased to 348 at March 31, 2005 from 250 at
March 31, 2004. Full service loan origination locations
increased to 31 offices and 32 satellite loan origination
locations at March 31, 2005 from an aggregate of 24
locations at March 31, 2004.
For the year ended December 31, 2004, we reported net
income of approximately $4.9 million, or $0.27 per
diluted share, as compared to net income of $13.7 million
for the year ended 2003. Our revenues were driven largely from
loan originations during the year. The decline in net income is
attributed to a decrease in gain on sale revenues as a result of
decreased gain on sale margins in 2004, the execution of our
core business strategy to retain selected originated loans in
portfolio (thus foregoing the gain on sale premiums we would
have otherwise received when such loans are sold to third
parties), and increased expenses incurred for and subsequent to
the acquisition of multiple retail loan origination branches
during 2004 and infrastructure enhancements to accommodate
increased loan origination capacity. For the year ended
December 31, 2004, we originated $1.8 billion in
residential mortgage loans as compared to $1.6 billion for
the same period of 2003. The increase in our loan origination
levels for the year ended December 31, 2004 as compared to
the year ended December 31, 2003 is the result of the
addition of sales personnel and branch offices primarily in new
and underserved markets. Total employees increased to 782 at
December 31, 2004 from 335 at December 31, 2003.
Included in the total number of employees, the number of loan
officers dedicated to originating loans increased to 344 at
December 31, 2004 from 142 at December 31, 2003. Full
service loan origination locations increased to 31 offices and
32 satellite loan origination locations at December 31,
2004 from 15 locations at December 31, 2003.
Summary of Operations and Key Performance Measurements
Subsequent to our IPO, our net income is largely dependent on
self-originated and purchased investments in residential
mortgage loans and securities, which we sometimes refer to here
as our portfolio management segment. Our portfolio management
activities generate revenues from the return on our mortgage
securities and spread income from our mortgage loan portfolio.
Our net income is also dependent upon our mortgage lending
operations and originations, which include the mortgage loan
sales, or mortgage banking, and mortgage brokering activities on
residential mortgages sold or brokered to third parties. We
sometimes refer to our mortgage lending operations and
originations as our mortgage lending segment. Our mortgage
banking activities generate revenues in the form of gains on
sales of mortgage loans to third parties and ancillary fee
income and interest income from borrowers. Our mortgage
brokering operations generate brokering fee revenues from third
party buyers.
32
A breakdown of our loan originations for the three months ended
March 31, 2005 follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aggregate | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal | |
|
Percentage | |
|
Weighted | |
|
|
|
|
Number | |
|
Balance | |
|
of Total | |
|
Average | |
|
Average | |
Description |
|
of Loans | |
|
($ in millions) | |
|
Principal | |
|
Coupon | |
|
Loan Size | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Purchase mortgages
|
|
|
1,812 |
|
|
$ |
380.9 |
|
|
|
56.6% |
|
|
|
6.02% |
|
|
$ |
210,230 |
|
Refinancings
|
|
|
1,296 |
|
|
|
291.6 |
|
|
|
43.4% |
|
|
|
5.71% |
|
|
|
225,002 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
3,108 |
|
|
$ |
672.5 |
|
|
|
100.0% |
|
|
|
5.88% |
|
|
$ |
216,390 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustable rate or hybrid
|
|
|
1,372 |
|
|
$ |
364.7 |
|
|
|
54.2% |
|
|
|
5.60% |
|
|
$ |
265,851 |
|
Fixed rate
|
|
|
1,736 |
|
|
|
307.8 |
|
|
|
45.8% |
|
|
|
6.22% |
|
|
|
177,299 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
3,108 |
|
|
$ |
672.5 |
|
|
|
100.0% |
|
|
|
5.88% |
|
|
$ |
216,390 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bankered
|
|
|
2,642 |
|
|
$ |
563.1 |
|
|
|
83.7% |
|
|
|
5.93% |
|
|
$ |
213,659 |
|
Brokered
|
|
|
466 |
|
|
|
109.4 |
|
|
|
16.3% |
|
|
|
5.63% |
|
|
|
231,873 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
3,108 |
|
|
$ |
672.5 |
|
|
|
100.0% |
|
|
|
5.88% |
|
|
$ |
216,390 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The key performance measures for our origination activities are:
|
|
|
|
|
dollar volume of mortgage loans originated; |
|
|
|
relative cost of the loans originated; |
|
|
|
characteristics of the loans, including but not limited to the
coupon and credit quality of the loan, which will indicate their
expected yield; and |
|
|
|
return on our mortgage asset investments and the related
management of interest rate risk. |
The key performance measures for our portfolio management
activities are:
|
|
|
|
|
net interest spread on the portfolio; |
|
|
|
characteristics of the investments and the underlying pool of
mortgage loans including but not limited to credit quality,
coupon and prepayment rates; and |
|
|
|
return on our mortgage asset investments and the related
management of interest rate risk. |
Managements discussion and analysis of financial condition
and results of operations, along with other portions of this
report, are designed to provide information regarding our
performance and these key performance measures.
Known Material Trends and Commentary
The U.S. residential mortgage market has experienced
considerable growth during the past ten years, with total
outstanding U.S. mortgage debt growing from approximately
$3.2 trillion at the end of 1993 to approximately
$7.3 trillion as of December 31, 2003, according to
The Bond Market Association and the Federal Reserve. The
April 14, 2005 Mortgage Finance Forecast of the Mortgage
Bankers Association (MBAA), estimated that lenders
originated approximately $2.65 trillion in 2004. In the
April forecast, the MBAA projects mortgage loan volumes will
fall to $2.50 trillion in 2005 and $2.19 trillion in
2006, respectively, primarily attributable to an expected
continued decline in the volume of refinancing of existing
loans. The April forecast also projects that mortgage loan
volume to home purchasers will be $1.48 trillion in 2004
and will increase to $1.53 trillion in 2005 and will
decrease to $1.50 trillion in 2006. We believe that our
concentration on purchase mortgage loan originations will cause
our loan origination volume to be less susceptible to the
expected industry-wide decline in origination volume that has
resulted from rising interest rates.
For the three months ended March 31, 2005, NYMCs
purchase loan originations represented 56.6% of NYMCs
total residential mortgage loan originations as measured by
principal balance, as compared to an
33
industry-wide percentage of 54.1% for one-to-four family
mortgage loans as estimated in the April 14, 2005 Mortgage
Finance Forecast of the MBAA. For the year ended
December 31, 2004, NYMCs purchase loan originations
represented 59.0% of NYMCs total residential mortgage loan
originations as measured by principal balance, as compared to an
industry-wide percentage of 55.7% for one-to-four family
mortgage loans as estimated in the April 14, 2005 Mortgage
Finance Forecast of the MBAA. We believe that the market for
mortgage loans for home purchases is less susceptible than the
refinance market to downturns during periods of increasing
interest rates, because borrowers seeking to purchase a home do
not generally base their decision to purchase on changes in
interest rates alone, while borrowers that refinance their
mortgage loans often make their decision as a direct result of
changes in interest rates. Consequently, while our
referral-based marketing strategy may cause our overall loan
origination volume during periods of declining interest rates to
lag our competitors who rely on mass marketing and advertising
and who therefore capture a greater percentage of loan refinance
applications during those periods, we believe this strategy
enables us to sustain stronger home purchase loan origination
volumes than those same competitors during periods of flat to
rising interest rates. In addition, we believe that our
referral-based business results in relatively higher gross
margins and lower advertising costs and loan generation expenses
than most other mortgage companies whose business is not
referral-based.
We depend on the capital markets to finance the mortgage loans
we originate. In the short-term, we finance our mortgage loans
using warehouse lines of credit and
aggregation lines provided by commercial and
investment banks. As we execute our business plan of
securitizing self-originated mortgage loans, we will issue bonds
from our loan securitizations and will own such bonds although
we may sell the bonds to large, institutional investors at some
point in the future. These bonds and some of our mortgage loans
may be financed with repurchase agreements with well capitalized
commercial and investment banks. Commercial and investment banks
have provided significant liquidity to finance our operations
through these various financing facilities. While management
cannot predict the future liquidity environment, we are
currently unaware of any material reason to prevent continued
liquidity support in the capital markets for our business. See
Liquidity and Capital Resources below for further
discussion of liquidity risks and resources available to us.
Within the past year, the mortgage REIT industry has seen a
significant increase in capital raising in the public markets.
Additionally, there have been several new entrants, including
ourselves, to the mortgage REIT business and other mortgage
lender conversions (or proposed conversions) to REIT status.
While many of these entrants focus on sub-prime and
nonconforming mortgage lending, there are also entrants which
will compete with our focus on the high-quality and prime
mortgage marketplace. This increased activity may impact the
pricing and underwriting guidelines within the high-quality and
prime marketplace. We have not changed our guidelines or pricing
in response to this activity nor do we have any plans to make
such changes at this time.
State and local governing bodies are focused on certain
practices engaged in by certain participants in the mortgage
lending business relating to fees borrowers incur in obtaining a
mortgage loan generally termed predatory
lending within the mortgage industry. In several
instances, states or local governing bodies have imposed strict
laws on lenders to curb such practices. To date, these laws have
had an insignificant impact on our business. We have capped fee
structures consistent with those adopted by federal mortgage
agencies and have implemented rigid processes to ensure that our
lending practices are not predatory in nature.
Description of Businesses
Our mortgage lending operations are significant to our financial
results as they produce the loans that ultimately will
collateralize the mortgage securities that we will hold in our
portfolio. We primarily originate prime, first lien residential
mortgage loans and, to a lesser extent second-lien mortgage
loans, home equity lines of credit, and bridge loans. We
originate all types of mortgage loan products including
adjustable-rate mortgages, or ARMs, which may have an initial
fixed rate period, and fixed-rate mortgages. Since the
completion of our IPO, we have begun to retain and aggregate our
self-originated, high-credit quality ARM
34
loans with shorter reset periods in order to pool them into
mortgage securities. The fixed rate loans we originate and any
ARM loans not meeting our investment criteria continue to be
sold to third parties. For the three months ended March 31,
2005 and 2004, we originated $426.8 million and
$199.4 million in mortgage loans for sale to third parties,
respectively. We recognized gains on sales of mortgage loans
totaling $4.3 million and $3.5 million for the three
months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively. For the
years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003, we originated
$1.4 billion and $1.2 billion in mortgage loans for
sale to third parties, respectively. We recognized gains on
sales of mortgage loans totaling $20.8 million and
$23.0 million for the years ended December 31, 2004
and 2003, respectively.
Subsequent to our IPO in June 2004, we began to retain high
quality, adjustable-rate mortgage loans that we originate in our
investment portfolio. For the three months ended March 31,
2005, we originated and retained $136.4 million of these
loans. As of March 31, 2005, only one loan in our portfolio
was more than 30 days delinquent.
We also broker loans to third party mortgage lenders for which
we receive a broker fee. For the three months ended
March 31, 2005 and 2004, we originated $109.4 million
and $84.1 million in brokered loans, respectively. We
recognized net brokering income totaling approximately $481,000
and $899,000 during the three months ended March 31, 2005
and 2004, respectively. For the years ended December 31,
2004 and 2003, we originated $410.1 million and
$365.5 million in brokered loans, respectively. We
recognized net brokering income totaling $1.6 million and
$2.9 million during the years ended December 31, 2004
and 2003, respectively.
Our wholly-owned subsidiary, NYMC, originates all of the
mortgage loans we retain, sell or broker. On mortgages to be
sold, we underwrite, process and fund the mortgages originated
by NYMC.
A significant risk to our mortgage lending operations is
liquidity risk the risk that we will not have
financing facilities and cash available to fund and hold loans
prior to their sale or securitization. We maintain lending
facilities with large banking and investment institutions to
reduce this risk. On a short-term basis, we finance mortgage
loans using warehouse lines of credit and repurchase agreements.
Details regarding available financing arrangements and amounts
outstanding under those arrangements are included in
Liquidity and Capital Resources below.
|
|
|
Mortgage Portfolio Management |
Prior to the completion of our IPO on June 29, 2004, our
operations were limited to the mortgage operations described in
the preceding section. Beginning in July 2004, we began to
implement our business plan of investing in high-credit quality,
adjustable-rate mortgage-related securities and residential
loans. Our mortgage portfolio, consisting primarily of
residential mortgage-backed securities and mortgage loans held
for investment currently generates a substantial portion of our
earnings. In managing our investment in a mortgage portfolio, we:
|
|
|
|
|
invest in assets generated primarily from our self-origination
of high-quality, single-family, residential mortgage loans; |
|
|
|
invest in mortgage-backed securities originated by others,
including ARM securities and collateralized mortgage
obligations, or CMO Floaters; |
|
|
|
operate as a long-term portfolio investor; |
|
|
|
finance our portfolio by entering into repurchase agreements and
as we aggregate mortgage loans for investment, entering into
securitization transactions from time to time; and |
|
|
|
generate earnings from the return on our mortgage securities and
spread income from our mortgage loan portfolio. |
A significant risk to our operations, relating to our portfolio
management, is the risk that interest rates on our assets will
not adjust at the same times or amounts that rates on our
liabilities adjust. Even though we retain and invest in ARMs,
many of the hybrid ARM loans in our portfolio have fixed rates
of interest for a period of time ranging from two to five years.
Our funding costs are generally not constant or fixed. Therefore,
35
we use derivative instruments (interest rate swaps and interest
rate caps) to mitigate, but not eliminate, the risk of our cost
of funding increasing or decreasing at a faster rate than the
interest on the loans (both those on the balance sheet and those
that serve as collateral for mortgage securities).
As of March 31, 2005 our mortgage securities portfolio
consisted of 100% AAA- rated or FannieMae or Freddie
Mac-guaranteed (FNMA/FHLMC) mortgage securities.
This allows the company to obtain excellent financing rates as
well as enhanced liquidity. The loans held for securitization
consisted of high-credit quality prime adjustable rate mortgages
with initial reset periods not greater than 5 years. Our
loan portfolio has had no credit losses to date. Our portfolio
strategy for ARM loan originations is to acquire only
high-credit quality ARM loans for our securitization process
thereby limiting any future potential losses.
Various characteristics of our investment securities and
mortgage loan portfolio as of March 31, 2005 are presented
below in Our Company Description of
Businesses Mortgage Portfolio Management.
Significance of Estimates and Critical Accounting Policies
We prepare our financial statements in conformity with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of
America, (GAAP), many of which require the use of
estimates, judgments and assumptions that affect reported
amounts. These estimates are based, in part, on our judgment and
assumptions regarding various economic conditions that we
believe are reasonable based on facts and circumstances existing
at the time of reporting. The results of these estimates affect
reported amounts of assets, liabilities and accumulated other
comprehensive income at the date of the consolidated financial
statements and the reported amounts of income, expenses and
other comprehensive income during the periods presented. The
following summarizes the components of our consolidated
financial statements where understanding accounting policies is
critical to understanding and evaluating our reported financial
results, especially given the significant estimates used in
applying the policies. Changes in the estimates and assumptions
could have a material effect on these financial statements.
Management has discussed the development and selection of these
critical accounting estimates with the audit committee of our
Board of Directors and the audit committee has reviewed our
disclosure.
Beginning with the completion of our acquisition of NYMC and
closing of our IPO on June 29, 2004, we commenced a change
in the way we conduct business. We have continued to originate
all types of residential mortgage loans and will continue to
sell or broker such production to third parties. However, we
also began to retain selected self-originated, shorter-term,
high-credit quality ARM loan production in our investment
portfolio for subsequent securitization. We also have invested
in investment-grade, shorter-term ARM securities.
Investment Securities Available for Sale. Our investments
in agency and AAA rated adjustable-rate
residential mortgage-backed securities are classified as
available for sale securities. Available for sale securities are
reported at fair value with unrealized gains and losses reported
in other comprehensive income (OCI). Gains and
losses recorded on the sale of investment securities available
for sale are based on the specific identification method and
included in gain on sale of securities. Purchase premiums or
discounts on investment securities are accreted or amortized to
interest income over the estimated life of the investment
securities using the interest method. Investment securities may
be subject to interest rate, credit and/or prepayment risk.
The fair values of our residential mortgage-backed securities
are generally based on market prices provided by five to seven
dealers who make markets in these financial instruments. If the
fair value of a security is not reasonably available from a
dealer, management estimates the fair value based on
characteristics of the security that we receive from the issuer
and on available market information.
In March 2004, the EITF reached a consensus on Issue No 03-1,
The Meaning of Other-Than-Temporary Impairment and Its
Application to Certain Investments. When the fair value of
an available for sale security is less than amortized cost,
management considers whether there is an other-than-temporary
impairment in the value of the security (e.g., whether the
security will be sold prior to the recovery of fair value). If,
in managements judgment, an other-than-temporary
impairment exists, the cost basis of the
36
security is written down to the then-current fair value, and the
unrealized loss is transferred from accumulated other
comprehensive income as an immediate reduction of current
earnings (i.e., as if the loss had been realized in the period
of impairment). Even though no credit concerns exist with
respect to an available for sale security, an
other-than-temporary impairment may be evident if management
determines that we do not have the intent and ability to hold an
investment until a forecasted recovery of the value of the
investment.
Mortgage Loans Held for Sale. Mortgage loans held for
sale represent mortgage loans originated and held pending sale
to interim and permanent investors. The mortgage loans are
carried at the lower of cost or market value. Market value is
determined by examining outstanding commitments from investors
or current investor yield requirements, calculated on the
aggregate loan basis, less an estimate of the costs to close the
loan, less the deferral of fees and points received, plus the
deferral of direct origination costs. Gains or losses on sales
are recognized at the time title transfers to the investor which
is typically concurrent with the transfer of the loan files and
related documentation and are based upon the difference between
the sales proceeds from the final investor and the adjusted book
value of the loan sold.
Mortgage Loans Held in the Securitization
Trust Mortgage loans held in the securitization
trust are loans the Company has securitized into sequentially
rated classes, currently the Company has retained a 100%
interest in the securitized loans. Mortgage loans held in the
securitization trust are recorded at amortized cost.
Transfers of Assets. A transfer of mortgage loans or
mortgage securities in which we surrender control over the
financial assets is accounted for as a sale. Gains and losses on
the assets transferred are recognized based on the carrying
amount of the financial assets involved in the transfer,
allocated between the assets transferred and the retained
interests, if any, based on their relative fair value at the
date of transfer. To determine fair value, we estimate fair
value based on the present value of future expected cash flows
using managements best estimate of the key assumptions,
including credit losses, prepayment speeds, forward yield
curves, and discount rates commensurate with the risks involved.
When we retain control over transferred mortgage loans or
mortgage securities (such as under a repurchase agreement), the
transaction is accounted for as a secured borrowing.
The following is a description of the methods we have
historically used to transfer assets, including the related
accounting treatment under each method.
|
|
|
|
|
Whole Loan Sales. Whole loan sales represent loans sold
on a servicing released basis wherein the servicing rights with
respect to the loans are transferred to the purchaser
concurrently with the sale of the loan. Gains and losses on
whole loan sales are recognized in the period the sale occurs
and we have determined that the criteria for sale treatment has
been achieved primarily by the surrender of control over the
assets transferred. We generally have an obligation to
repurchase whole loans sold in circumstances in which the
borrower fails to make one of the first three payments.
Additionally, we are also generally required to repay all or a
portion of the premium we receive on the sale of whole loans in
the event that the loan prepays in its entirety within a period
of one year after origination. |
|
|
|
Loans and Securities Sold Under Repurchase Agreements.
Repurchase agreements represent legal sales of loans or mortgage
securities and an agreement to repurchase the loans or mortgage
securities at a later date. Repurchase agreements are accounted
for as secured borrowings because we have not surrendered
control of the transferred assets. |
Mortgage Loans Held for Investment. We retain in our
portfolio substantially all of the adjustable-rate mortgage
loans that we originate and that meet our investment criteria
and portfolio requirements. We service loans that we originate
and retain in our portfolio through a subservicer. Servicing is
the function primarily consisting of collecting monthly payments
from mortgage borrowers, and disbursing those funds to the
appropriate loan investors.
We may also include in our portfolio loans acquired in bulk
pools from other originators and securities dealers. Mortgage
loans held for investment are recorded net of deferred loan
origination fees and associated direct costs and are stated at
amortized cost. Mortgage loan origination fees and associated
direct mortgage loan origination costs on mortgage loans
held-in-portfolio are deferred and amortized over the life of
the loan
37
as an adjustment to yield using the level yield method. This
amortization includes the effect of projected prepayments; such
prepayment projections involve significant management judgments.
Interest is recognized as revenue when earned according to the
terms of the mortgage loans and when, in the opinion of
management, it is collectible. The accrual of interest on loans
is discontinued when, in managements opinion, the interest
is not collectible in the normal course of business, but in no
case beyond when payment on a loan becomes 90 days
delinquent. Interest collected on loans for which accrual has
been discontinued is recognized as income upon receipt.
We establish an allowance for loan losses based on our estimate
of credit losses inherent in our investment portfolio of
residential loans held for investment. Our portfolio mortgage
loans held for investment are collectively evaluated for
impairment as the loans are homogeneous in nature. The allowance
is based upon the assessment of management of various factors
affecting our mortgage loan portfolio, including current
economic conditions, the makeup of the portfolio based on credit
grade, loan-to-value ratios, delinquency status, historical
credit losses, purchased mortgage insurance and other factors
deemed to warrant consideration. The allowance is maintained
through ongoing provisions charged to operating income and is
reduced by loans that are charged off. Determining the allowance
for loan losses is subjective in nature due to the estimation
required and the potential for imprecision.
Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of Financial
Assets. We may regularly securitize mortgage loans by
transferring mortgage loans to independent trusts which issue
securities to investors. These securities are collateralized by
the mortgage loans transferred into these independent trusts. We
will generally retain interests in all or some of the securities
issued by the trusts. Certain of the securitization agreements
may require us to repurchase loans that are found to have legal
deficiencies, subsequent to the date of transfer. The accounting
treatment for transfers of assets upon securitization depends on
whether or not we have surrendered control over the transferred
assets. We will service, through a subservicer, loans that we
originate and retain in our portfolio.
As we retain a portfolio of loans for securitization, we will
comply with the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards No. 140 Accounting for Transfers and Servicing
of Financial Assets and Extinguishments of Liabilities, or
SFAS No. 140, related to each securitization.
Depending on the structure of the securitization, it will either
be treated as a sale or secured financing for financial
statement purposes. We anticipate that our securitizations will
be treated as secured financings under SFAS No. 140.
Our strategy of retaining on our balance sheet certain mortgage
loans held for investment and included in our securitization
pools will reduce the number of loans NYMC sells and, therefore,
our total gains on sales of mortgage loans for financial
accounting purposes will be lower than NYMC has historically
recognized.
Derivative Financial Instruments. We generally hedge only
the risk related to changes in the benchmark interest rate used
in the variable rate index, usually a London Interbank Offered
Rate, known as LIBOR, or a U.S. Treasury rate.
In order to reduce these risks, we enter into interest rate swap
agreements whereby we receive floating rate payments in exchange
for fixed rate payments, effectively converting the borrowing to
a fixed rate. We also enter into interest rate cap agreements
whereby, in exchange for a fee, we are reimbursed for interest
paid in excess of a certain capped rate.
To qualify for cash flow hedge accounting, interest rate swaps
and caps must meet certain criteria, including:
|
|
|
(1) that the items being hedged expose us to interest rate
risk, and |
|
|
(2) that the interest rate swaps or caps are highly
effective in reducing our exposure to interest rate risk. |
Correlation and effectiveness of the interest rate swaps and
caps are periodically assessed based upon a comparison of the
relative changes in the fair values or cash flows of the
interest rate swaps and caps and the items being hedged.
38
For derivative instruments that are designated and qualify as a
cash flow hedge (meaning hedging the exposure to variability in
expected future cash flows that is attributable to a particular
risk), the effective portion of the gain or loss, and net
payments received or made, on the derivative instrument is
reported as a component of other comprehensive income and
reclassified into earnings in the same period or periods during
which the hedged transaction affects earnings. The remaining
gain or loss on the derivative instrument in excess of the
cumulative change in the present value of future cash flows of
the hedged item, if any, is recognized in current earnings
during the period of change.
With respect to interest rate swaps and caps that have not been
designated as hedges, any net payments under, or fluctuations in
the fair value of, these swaps and caps will be recorded to
current income.
Derivative financial instruments contain credit risk to the
extent that the institutional counterparties may be unable to
meet the terms of the agreements. We minimize this risk by using
multiple counterparties and limiting our counterparties to major
financial institutions with good credit ratings. In addition, we
regularly monitor the potential risk of loss with any one party
resulting from this type of credit risk. Accordingly, we do not
expect any material losses as a result of default by other
parties.
We enter into derivative transactions solely for risk management
purposes. The decision of whether or not a given transaction (or
portion thereof) is hedged is made on a case-by-case basis,
based on the risks involved and other factors as determined by
senior management, including the financial impact on income and
asset valuation and the restrictions imposed on REIT hedging
activities by the Internal Revenue Code, among others. In
determining whether to hedge a risk, we may consider whether
other assets, liabilities, firm commitments and anticipated
transactions already offset or reduce the risk. All transactions
undertaken as a hedge are entered into with a view towards
minimizing the potential for economic losses that could be
incurred by us. Generally, all derivatives entered into are
intended to qualify as hedges in accordance with GAAP, unless
specifically precluded under SFAS No. 133
Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging
Activities. To this end, terms of the hedges are matched
closely to the terms of hedged items.
We have also developed risk management programs and processes
designed to manage market risk associated with normal mortgage
banking and mortgage-backed securities investment activities.
In the normal course of our mortgage loan origination business,
we enter into contractual interest rate lock commitments, or
IRLCs, to extend credit to finance residential mortgages. These
commitments, which contain fixed expiration dates, become
effective when eligible borrowers lock-in a specified interest
rate within time frames established by our origination, credit
and underwriting practices. Interest rate risk arises if
interest rates change between the time of the lock-in of the
rate by the borrower and the sale of the loan. The IRLCs are
considered undesignated or free-standing derivatives.
Accordingly, IRLCs are recorded at fair value with changes in
fair value recorded to current earnings. Mark to market
adjustments on IRLCs are recorded from the inception of the
interest rate lock through the date the underlying loan is
funded. The fair value of the IRLCs is determined by an estimate
of the ultimate gain on sale of the loans net of estimated net
costs to originate the loan. Beginning in the second quarter of
2004, the fair value of IRLCs are valued in accordance with SEC
Staff Accounting Bulletin 105 which requires the exclusion
of servicing rights cash flows prior to mortgage loans sold with
servicing retained. We currently sell all of our mortgage loans
servicing released.
To mitigate the effect of the interest rate risk inherent in
issuing an IRLC from the lock-in date to the funding date of a
loan, we generally enter into forward sale loan contracts, or
FSLCs. Since the FSLCs are committed prior to mortgage loan
funding and thus there is no owned asset to hedge, the FSLCs in
place prior to the funding of a loan are undesignated
derivatives under SFAS No. 133 and are marked to
market with changes in fair value recorded to current earnings.
We use other derivative instruments, including treasury, agency
or mortgage-backed securities and forward sale contracts, which
are also classified as free-standing, undesignated derivatives
and thus are recorded at fair value with the changes in fair
value recorded to current earnings.
Once a loan has been funded, our risk management objective for
our mortgage loans held for sale is to protect earnings from an
unexpected charge due to a decline in value of such mortgage
loans. Our strategy is to engage in a risk management program
involving the designation of FSLCs (the same FSLCs entered into
at
39
the time of the IRLC) to hedge most of our mortgage loans held
for sale. Provided that the FSLCs have been designated as
qualifying hedges for the funded loans and the notional amount
of the forward delivery contracts, along with the underlying
rate and critical terms of the contracts, are equivalent to the
unpaid principal amount of the mortgage loans being hedged, the
forward delivery contracts effectively fix the forward sales
price and thereby offset interest rate and price risk to us. We
evaluate this relationship quarterly and classify and account
for FSLCs which are deemed effective as cash flow hedges.
We employ a number of risk management monitoring procedures that
are designed to ensure that the designated hedging relationships
are demonstrating, and are expected to continue to demonstrate,
a high level of effectiveness. Hedge accounting is discontinued
on a prospective basis if it is determined that the hedging
relationship is no longer highly effective or expected to be
highly effective in offsetting changes in fair value of the
hedged item. Additionally, we may elect to de-designate a hedge
relationship during an interim period and re-designate upon the
rebalancing of a hedge profile and the corresponding hedge
relationship. When hedge accounting is discontinued, we continue
to carry the derivative instruments on our balance sheet at fair
value with changes in their value recorded to current earnings.
Recognition of Interest Income and Impairment on Purchased
and Retained Beneficial Interests in Securitized Financial
Assets. As previously described herein, we plan to regularly
securitize our mortgage loans and retain beneficial interests
created. In addition, we may purchase such beneficial interests
from third parties. For certain of our purchased and retained
beneficial interests in securitized financial assets we will
follow the guidance in Financial Accounting Standards Board
Emerging Issues Task Force Issue No. 99-20,
Recognition of Interest Income and Impairment on Purchased
and Retained Beneficial Interests in Securitized Financial
Assets, or EITF 99-20. Accordingly, on a quarterly
basis, when significant changes in estimated cash flows
generated from the securitized assets underlying
collateral from the cash flows previously estimated occur due to
actual prepayment and credit loss experience, we will calculate
revised yields based on the current amortized cost of the
investment (including any other-than-temporary impairments
recognized to date) and the revised cash flows. The revised
yields are then applied prospectively to recognize interest
income.
Additionally, when significant changes in estimated cash flows
from the cash flows previously estimated occur due to actual
prepayment and credit loss experience, and the present value of
the revised cash flows using the current expected yield is less
than the present value of the previously estimated remaining
cash flows (adjusted for cash receipts during the intervening
period), an other-than- temporary impairment is deemed to have
occurred. Accordingly, the security is written down to the fair
value with the resulting change being included in income, and a
new cost basis established. In both instances, the original
discount or premium is written off when the new cost basis is
established. After taking into account the effect of the
impairment charge, income is recognized under EITF 99-20,
as applicable, using the market yield for the security used in
establishing the write-down. These estimates involve significant
management judgment.
Financial Highlights for the Three Months Ended
March 31, 2005
|
|
|
|
|
Completed our first loan securitization of approximately
$419 million in residential mortgage loans; |
|
|
|
Issued $25 million of trust preferred securities; |
|
|
|
Total assets increased to $1.9 billion as of March 31,
2005 from $1.6 billion as of December 31,
2004; and |
|
|
|
Aided in part by the SIB and GRL acquisitions, approximately
137.2% growth in loan originations of $672.5 million for
the three months ended March 31, 2005 as compared to
$283.5 million for the three months ended March 31,
2004, and relative to an overall industry decline of 4.9% for
the quarter as projected by the MBAA in its April 2005 report. |
Financial Highlights for the Year Ended December 31,
2004
|
|
|
|
|
IPO of 15 million shares at $9.00 per share raising
approximate net proceeds of $122 million; |
40
|
|
|
|
|
Substantial portion of IPO proceeds invested in approximately
$1.2 billion in AAA-rated and/or Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac
guaranteed residential mortgage-backed securities; |
|
|
|
Total assets increased to $1.6 billion as of
December 31, 2004 from $110.1 million as of
December 31, 2003; |
|
|
|
Acquisition of mortgage banking business of Guaranteed
Residential Lending, Inc., or GRL, which is expected to double
annual mortgage originations; and |
|
|
|
Aided in part by the SIB and GRL acquisitions, approximately
15.3% growth in loan originations of $1.85 billion for the
year ended December 31, 2004 as compared to
$1.60 billion for the year ended December 31, 2003 and
relative to an overall industry decline of 30.4% for 2004 as
projected by the MBAA in its April 2005 report. |
Results of Operations and Financial Condition
Our results of operations for our mortgage portfolio management
segment during a given period typically reflect the net interest
spread earned on our investment portfolio of residential
mortgage loans and mortgage-backed securities. The net interest
spread is impacted by factors such as our cost of financing, the
interest rate our investments are earning and our interest
hedging strategies. Furthermore, the cost of originating loans
held in our portfolio, the amount of premium or discount paid on
purchased portfolio investments and the prepayment rates on
portfolio investments will impact the net interest spread as
such factors will be amortized over the expected term of such
investments.
Our results of operations for our mortgage lending segment
during a given period typically reflect the total volume of
loans originated and closed by us during that period. The volume
of closed loan originations generated by us in any period is
impacted by a variety of factors. These factors include:
|
|
|
|
|
The demand for new mortgage loans. Reduced demand for
mortgage loans causes closed loan origination volume to decline.
Demand for new mortgage loans is directly impacted by current
interest rate trends and other economic conditions. Rising
interest rates tend to reduce demand for new mortgage loans,
particularly demand for loan refinancings, and falling interest
rates tend to increase demand for new mortgage loans,
particularly loan refinancings. |
|
|
|
Loan refinancing and home purchase trends. As discussed
above, the volume of loan refinancings tends to increase
following declines in interest rates and to decrease when
interest rates rise. The volume of home purchases is also
affected by interest rates, although to a lesser extent than
refinancing volume. Home purchase trends are also affected by
other economic changes such as inflation, improvements in the
stock market, unemployment rates and other similar factors. |
|
|
|
Seasonality. Historically, according to the MBAA, loan
originations during late November, December, January and
February of each year are typically lower than during other
months in the year due, in part, to inclement weather, fewer
business days (due to holidays and the short month of February),
and the fact that home buyers tend to purchase homes during the
warmer months of the year. As a result, loan volumes tend to be
lower in the first and fourth quarters of a year than in the
second and third quarters. |
|
|
|
Occasional spikes in volume resulting from isolated
events. Mortgage lenders may experience spikes in loan
origination volume from time to time due to non-recurring events
or transactions. For example, we were able to complete an
unusually large and non-recurring mass closing of 347
condominium unit mortgage loans for which we negotiated a bulk
end-loan commitment for condominium buyers in the Ruppert Homes
Project in the first quarter of 2003. |
The mortgage banking industry witnessed record levels of closed
loan originations beginning in mid-2002 and continuing
throughout 2003, due primarily to the availability of
historically low interest rates during that period. These
historically low interest rates caused existing home owners to
refinance their mortgages at record levels and induced many
first-time home buyers to purchase homes and many existing home
owners to purchase new homes. We, like most industry
participants, enjoyed a record increase in our volume of closed
41
loan originations during that period. During the first quarter
of 2004, the Federal Reserve Bank of the United States signaled
that moderate increases in interest rates were likely to occur
during and after the second quarter of 2004 and followed up its
first increase in interest rates in four years with measured,
continued increases to-date. This reduced the volume and pace of
refinance activity from the peak levels experienced by the
industry in 2003.
The September 17, 2004 Mortgage Finance Forecast of the
MBAA indicated that closed loan originations in the industry for
2003 totaled $3.81 trillion. In its April 14, 2005 Mortgage
Finance Forecast, the MBAA forecast that closed loan
originations in the industry declined to approximately $2.65
trillion in 2004 and will decline to $2.50 trillion in 2005.
These forecasts predict a decline in refinancings during 2004
and in subsequent years modest increases in purchase
originations. Although our origination volumes to date have
continued to trend upward, due in part to the SIB and GRL
acquisitions, these projected industry declines in the overall
volume of closed loan originations may have a negative effect on
our loan origination volume and net income. We believe that our
concentration on purchase loan originations has caused our loan
origination volume to be less susceptible to the industry-wide
decline in origination volume.
The volume and cost of our loan origination is critical to our
financial results. The loans we originate generate gains as they
are sold to third parties. Loans we retain for securitization
serve as collateral for our mortgage securities. We do not
recognize gain on sale income on loans originated by us and
retained in our investment portfolio as they are recorded at
cost and will generate revenues through their maturity and
ultimate repayment. As the cost basis of a retained loan is
typically lower than loans purchased from third parties or
already placed in a securitization, we would expect an
incremental yield increase on these loans relative to their
purchased counterparts.
The cost of our origination is also critical to our financial
results as it is a significant factor in the gains we recognize.
The following table summarizes our loan production for the
quarter ended March 31, 2005 and for each quarter of fiscal
years 2004 and 2003.
|
|
|
Loan Origination Summary(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aggregate | |
|
Average | |
|
Weighted Average | |
|
|
Number | |
|
Principal | |
|
Principal | |
|
| |
|
|
of Loans | |
|
Balance | |
|
Balance | |
|
LTV(2) | |
|
FICO | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Dollars in millions) | |
|
|
|
|
2005:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ARM
|
|
|
1,313 |
|
|
$ |
355.3 |
|
|
$ |
270,603 |
|
|
|
73% |
|
|
|
708 |
|
|
|
Fixed-rate
|
|
|
1,274 |
|
|
|
247.8 |
|
|
|
194,541 |
|
|
|
71% |
|
|
|
719 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal non-FHA
|
|
|
2,587 |
|
|
$ |
603.1 |
|
|
$ |
233,145 |
|
|
|
72% |
|
|
|
712 |
|
|
|
FHA
|
|
|
521 |
|
|
|
69.4 |
|
|
|
133,191 |
|
|
|
92% |
|
|
|
637 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
3,108 |
|
|
$ |
672.5 |
|
|
$ |
216,390 |
|
|
|
74% |
|
|
|
705 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase mortgages
|
|
|
1717 |
|
|
$ |
365.8 |
|
|
$ |
213,081 |
|
|
|
76% |
|
|
|
723 |
|
|
|
Refinancings
|
|
|
870 |
|
|
|
237.3 |
|
|
|
272,743 |
|
|
|
66% |
|
|
|
696 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal non-FHA
|
|
|
2,587 |
|
|
$ |
603.1 |
|
|
$ |
233,145 |
|
|
|
72% |
|
|
|
712 |
|
|
|
FHA
|
|
|
521 |
|
|
|
69.4 |
|
|
|
133,191 |
|
|
|
92% |
|
|
|
637 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
3,108 |
|
|
$ |
672.5 |
|
|
$ |
216,390 |
|
|
|
74% |
|
|
|
705 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aggregate | |
|
Average | |
|
Weighted Average | |
|
|
Number | |
|
Principal | |
|
Principal | |
|
| |
|
|
of Loans | |
|
Balance | |
|
Balance | |
|
LTV(2) | |
|
FICO | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Dollars in millions) | |
|
|
|
|
2004:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fourth Quarter
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ARM
|
|
|
1,094 |
|
|
$ |
330.1 |
|
|
$ |
301,765 |
|
|
|
71% |
|
|
|
714 |
|
|
|
Fixed-rate
|
|
|
956 |
|
|
|
206.8 |
|
|
|
216,266 |
|
|
|
72% |
|
|
|
714 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal non-FHA
|
|
|
2,050 |
|
|
$ |
536.9 |
|
|
$ |
261,893 |
|
|
|
72% |
|
|
|
714 |
|
|
|
FHA
|
|
|
749 |
|
|
|
95.7 |
|
|
|
127,868 |
|
|
|
92% |
|
|
|
623 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
2,799 |
|
|
$ |
632.6 |
|
|
$ |
226,029 |
|
|
|
75% |
|
|
|
700 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase mortgages
|
|
|
1,426 |
|
|
$ |
353.3 |
|
|
$ |
247,722 |
|
|
|
75% |
|
|
|
724 |
|
|
|
Refinancings
|
|
|
624 |
|
|
|
183.6 |
|
|
|
294,278 |
|
|
|
64% |
|
|
|
694 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal non-FHA
|
|
|
2,050 |
|
|
$ |
536.9 |
|
|
$ |
261,893 |
|
|
|
72% |
|
|
|
714 |
|
|
|
FHA
|
|
|
749 |
|
|
|
95.7 |
|
|
|
127,868 |
|
|
|
92% |
|
|
|
623 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
2,799 |
|
|
$ |
632.6 |
|
|
$ |
226,029 |
|
|
|
75% |
|
|
|
700 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Third Quarter
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ARM
|
|
|
692 |
|
|
$ |
208.9 |
|
|
$ |
301,875 |
|
|
|
71% |
|
|
|
718 |
|
|
|
Fixed-rate
|
|
|
639 |
|
|
|
145.7 |
|
|
|
228,034 |
|
|
|
71% |
|
|
|
714 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal non-FHA
|
|
|
1,331 |
|
|
$ |
354.6 |
|
|
$ |
266,425 |
|
|
|
71% |
|
|
|
716 |
|
|
|
FHA
|
|
|
481 |
|
|
|
60.8 |
|
|
|
126,445 |
|
|
|
92% |
|
|
|
610 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
1,812 |
|
|
$ |
415.4 |
|
|
$ |
229,267 |
|
|
|
74% |
|
|
|
701 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase mortgages
|
|
|
1,019 |
|
|
$ |
265.9 |
|
|
$ |
260,933 |
|
|
|
73% |
|
|
|
725 |
|
|
|
Refinancings
|
|
|
312 |
|
|
|
88.7 |
|
|
|
284,360 |
|
|
|
63% |
|
|
|
691 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal non-FHA
|
|
|
1,331 |
|
|
$ |
354.6 |
|
|
$ |
266,425 |
|
|
|
71% |
|
|
|
716 |
|
|
|
FHA
|
|
|
481 |
|
|
|
60.8 |
|
|
|
126,445 |
|
|
|
92% |
|
|
|
610 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
1,812 |
|
|
$ |
415.4 |
|
|
$ |
229,267 |
|
|
|
74% |
|
|
|
701 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Second Quarter
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ARM
|
|
|
781 |
|
|
$ |
253.4 |
|
|
$ |
324,450 |
|
|
|
70% |
|
|
|
722 |
|
|
|
Fixed-rate
|
|
|
797 |
|
|
|
167.2 |
|
|
|
209,781 |
|
|
|
71% |
|
|
|
720 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal non-FHA
|
|
|
1,578 |
|
|
$ |
420.6 |
|
|
$ |
266,534 |
|
|
|
70% |
|
|
|
721 |
|
|
|
FHA
|
|
|
793 |
|
|
|
93.4 |
|
|
|
117,751 |
|
|
|
92% |
|
|
|
655 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
2,371 |
|
|
$ |
514.0 |
|
|
$ |
216,772 |
|
|
|
74% |
|
|
|
709 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase mortgages
|
|
|
1,021 |
|
|
$ |
262.7 |
|
|
$ |
257,283 |
|
|
|
75% |
|
|
|
728 |
|
|
|
Refinancings
|
|
|
557 |
|
|
|
157.9 |
|
|
|
283,492 |
|
|
|
62% |
|
|
|
711 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal non-FHA
|
|
|
1,578 |
|
|
$ |
420.6 |
|
|
$ |
117,751 |
|
|
|
70% |
|
|
|
721 |
|
|
|
FHA
|
|
|
793 |
|
|
|
93.4 |
|
|
|
117,751 |
|
|
|
92% |
|
|
|
655 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
2,371 |
|
|
$ |
514.0 |
|
|
$ |
216,772 |
|
|
|
74% |
|
|
|
709 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aggregate | |
|
Average | |
|
Weighted Average | |
|
|
Number | |
|
Principal | |
|
Principal | |
|
| |
|
|
of Loans | |
|
Balance | |
|
Balance | |
|
LTV(2) | |
|
FICO | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Dollars in millions) | |
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ARM
|
|
|
458 |
|
|
$ |
145.5 |
|
|
$ |
317,667 |
|
|
|
70% |
|
|
|
703 |
|
|
|
Fixed-rate
|
|
|
613 |
|
|
|
138.0 |
|
|
|
225,057 |
|
|
|
71% |
|
|
|
704 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
1,071 |
|
|
$ |
283.5 |
|
|
$ |
264,661 |
|
|
|
71% |
|
|
|
703 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase mortgages
|
|
|
650 |
|
|
$ |
169.3 |
|
|
$ |
260,469 |
|
|
|
75% |
|
|
|
711 |
|
|
|
Refinancings
|
|
|
421 |
|
|
|
114.2 |
|
|
|
271,132 |
|
|
|
64% |
|
|
|
692 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
1,071 |
|
|
$ |
283.5 |
|
|
$ |
264,661 |
|
|
|
71% |
|
|
|
703 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2003:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fourth Quarter
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ARM
|
|
|
502 |
|
|
$ |
181.1 |
|
|
$ |
360,691 |
|
|
|
69% |
|
|
|
708 |
|
|
|
Fixed-rate
|
|
|
705 |
|
|
|
158.7 |
|
|
|
225,127 |
|
|
|
70% |
|
|
|
707 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
1,207 |
|
|
$ |
339.8 |
|
|
$ |
281,509 |
|
|
|
70% |
|
|
|
707 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase mortgages
|
|
|
749 |
|
|
$ |
203.2 |
|
|
$ |
271,209 |
|
|
|
75% |
|
|
|
712 |
|
|
|
Refinancings
|
|
|
458 |
|
|
|
136.6 |
|
|
|
298,353 |
|
|
|
61% |
|
|
|
699 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
1,207 |
|
|
$ |
339.8 |
|
|
$ |
281,509 |
|
|
|
70% |
|
|
|
707 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Third Quarter
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ARM
|
|
|
585 |
|
|
$ |
224.1 |
|
|
$ |
383,018 |
|
|
|
68% |
|
|
|
714 |
|
|
|
Fixed-rate
|
|
|
1,062 |
|
|
|
262.2 |
|
|
|
246,880 |
|
|
|
67% |
|
|
|
707 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
1,647 |
|
|
$ |
486.3 |
|
|
$ |
295,235 |
|
|
|
67% |
|
|
|
711 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase mortgages
|
|
|
772 |
|
|
$ |
218.2 |
|
|
$ |
282,537 |
|
|
|
75% |
|
|
|
717 |
|
|
|
Refinancings
|
|
|
875 |
|
|
|
268.1 |
|
|
|
306,439 |
|
|
|
60% |
|
|
|
706 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
1,647 |
|
|
$ |
486.3 |
|
|
$ |
295,235 |
|
|
|
67% |
|
|
|
711 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Second Quarter
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ARM
|
|
|
452 |
|
|
$ |
158.1 |
|
|
$ |
349,624 |
|
|
|
66% |
|
|
|
691 |
|
|
|
Fixed-rate
|
|
|
1,051 |
|
|
|
254.8 |
|
|
|
242,478 |
|
|
|
67% |
|
|
|
713 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
1,503 |
|
|
$ |
412.9 |
|
|
$ |
274,700 |
|
|
|
67% |
|
|
|
705 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase mortgages
|
|
|
647 |
|
|
$ |
173.7 |
|
|
$ |
268,487 |
|
|
|
74% |
|
|
|
691 |
|
|
|
Refinancings
|
|
|
856 |
|
|
|
239.2 |
|
|
|
279,397 |
|
|
|
61% |
|
|
|
715 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
1,503 |
|
|
$ |
412.9 |
|
|
$ |
274,700 |
|
|
|
67% |
|
|
|
705 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ARM
|
|
|
399 |
|
|
$ |
144.1 |
|
|
$ |
361,230 |
|
|
|
70% |
|
|
|
719 |
|
|
|
Fixed-rate
|
|
|
948 |
|
|
|
217.3 |
|
|
|
229,203 |
|
|
|
71% |
|
|
|
707 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
1,347 |
|
|
$ |
361.4 |
|
|
$ |
268,311 |
|
|
|
70% |
|
|
|
712 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase mortgages
|
|
|
845 |
|
|
$ |
208.5 |
|
|
$ |
246,756 |
|
|
|
78% |
|
|
|
722 |
|
|
|
Refinancings
|
|
|
502 |
|
|
|
152.9 |
|
|
|
304,590 |
|
|
|
60% |
|
|
|
699 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
1,347 |
|
|
$ |
361.4 |
|
|
$ |
268,311 |
|
|
|
70% |
|
|
|
712 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
44
|
|
(1) |
Beginning near the end of the first quarter of 2004, our volume
of FHA loans increased. Generally, FHA loans have lower average
balances and FICO scores which are reflected in the statistics
above. All FHA loans are currently and will be in the future
sold or brokered to third parties. |
|
(2) |
Loan-to-value calculations are on first-lien mortgage loans only. |
|
|
|
Cash and Cash Equivalents |
We had unrestricted cash and cash equivalents of
$6.9 million, $7.6 million and $4.0 million at
March 31, 2005, December 31, 2004 and
December 31, 2003, respectively. The increase from 2003
results from our larger operating platform as a result of our
IPO and the timing of our mortgage loan closings and receipt of
interest and principal payments on our securities and loan
investment portfolio.
|
|
|
Investment Securities Available for Sale |
The following table summarizes our residential mortgage-backed
securities owned at March 31, 2005, classified by type of
issuer and by ratings categories:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Portfolio | |
|
|
Category |
|
Par Value | |
|
Coupon | |
|
Carrying Value | |
|
Mix | |
|
Yield | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
FNMA or FHLMC ARMs
|
|
$ |
546,833,685 |
|
|
|
4.24% |
|
|
$ |
548,943,790 |
|
|
|
49% |
|
|
|
4.04% |
|
AAA- rated
|
|
|
408,474,733 |
|
|
|
4.68% |
|
|
|
408,569,557 |
|
|
|
37% |
|
|
|
4.39% |
|
CMO floaters
|
|
|
154,295,367 |
|
|
|
3.88% |
|
|
|
155,476,448 |
|
|
|
14% |
|
|
|
3.95% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
1,109,603,785 |
|
|
|
4.35% |
|
|
$ |
1,112,989,795 |
|
|
|
100% |
|
|
|
4.16% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table summarizes our residential mortgage-backed
securities owned at December 31, 2004, classified by type
of issuer and by ratings categories:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Portfolio | |
|
|
Category |
|
Par Value | |
|
Coupon | |
|
Carrying Value | |
|
Mix | |
|
Yield | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
FNMA or FHLMC ARMs
|
|
$ |
591,372,079 |
|
|
|
4.24% |
|
|
$ |
598,289,982 |
|
|
|
50% |
|
|
|
3.84% |
|
AAA- rated
|
|
|
537,105,436 |
|
|
|
4.39% |
|
|
|
540,896,815 |
|
|
|
45% |
|
|
|
4.07% |
|
CMO floaters
|
|
|
65,577,825 |
|
|
|
3.35% |
|
|
|
65,557,917 |
|
|
|
5% |
|
|
|
3.56% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
1,194,055,340 |
|
|
|
4.26% |
|
|
$ |
1,204,744,714 |
|
|
|
100% |
|
|
|
3.93% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage Loans Held for Sale |
Loans we have originated, but have not yet sold or securitized,
are classified as held-for-sale. We had mortgage
loans held for sale of approximately $99.6 million and
$85.4 million at March 31, 2005 and December 31,
2004, respectively. Mortgage loans held for sale represent
mortgage loans originated and held pending sale to interim and
permanent investors and are carried at the lower of cost or
market value. We use warehouse lines of credit to finance our
held-for-sale loans. As such, the fluctuations in mortgage
loans held-for-sale and short-term borrowings
between January 1, 2004 and March 31, 2005 are
dependent on loans we have originated during the period as well
as loans we have sold outright.
|
|
|
Mortgage Loans Held for Investment |
Loans we have originated and that meet our investment criteria
are transferred into our investment portfolio and are classified
as held-for-investment. We had mortgage loans held
for investment of approximately $68.5 million and
$190.2 million at March 31, 2005 and December 31,
2004, respectively. Mortgage loans held for investment represent
mortgage loans originated and aggregated in portfolio and which
are intended to be securitized. As such, the fluctuations in
mortgage loans held for investment are dependent on the amount
of such loans that are securitized during the quarter that
become classified as mortgage loans held in the
securitization trust.
45
|
|
|
Mortgage Loans Held in the Securitization Trust |
When we securitize loans we have originated or purchased that
meet our investment criteria and the securitization is
structured as a secured borrowing for accounting purposes, such
loans used as underlying collateral for the securitization are
classified as mortgage loans held in the securitization trust.
We had loans collateralizing debt obligations of approximately
$417.4 million at March 31, 2005. We retained all of
the resultant securities and have financed these securities with
repurchase agreements.
|
|
|
Due from Loan Purchasers and Escrow Deposits
Pending Loan Closing |
We had amounts due from loan purchasers totaling approximately
$91.3 million and $79.9 million at March 31, 2005
and December 31, 2004, respectively. We had escrow deposits
pending loan closing of approximately $22.4 million and
$16.2 million as of March 31, 2005 and
December 31, 2004, respectively. Amounts due from loan
purchasers are a receivable for the principal and premium due to
us for loans that have been shipped but for which payment has
not yet been received at period end. Escrow deposits pending
loan closing are advance cash fundings by us to escrow agents to
be used to close loans within the next one to three business
days.
Prepaid and other assets totaled approximately $8.1 million
and $4.4 million as of March 31, 2005 and
December 31, 2004, respectively. Other assets at
March 31, 2005 (unaudited) consist primarily of a deferred
tax benefit of $4.3 million and, at March 31, 2005 and
December 31, 2004, also consist of loans held by us which
are pending remedial action (such as updating loan
documentation) or which do not currently meet third-party
investor criteria.
|
|
|
Financing Arrangements, Mortgage Loans Held for Sale/for
Investment |
We had debt outstanding on our financing facilities of
approximately $271.7 million and $359.2 million as of
March 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004, respectively,
the proceeds of which finance our mortgage loans held for sale.
The current weighted average borrowing rate on these financing
facilities is 3.30%. We use warehouse lines of credit to finance
our held-for-sale loans. As such, the fluctuations in mortgage
loans held-for-sale and short-term borrowings between
January 1, 2004 and March 31, 2005 are dependent on
loans we have originated during the period as well as loans we
have sold outright.
|
|
|
Financing Arrangements, Portfolio Investments |
We have arrangements to enter into repurchase agreements with 21
different financial institutions having a total line capacity of
approximately $4.8 billion. As of March 31, 2005 and
December 31, 2004, there were approximately
$1.4 billion and $1.1 billion, respectively, of
repurchase agreements. Our repurchase agreements typically have
terms of less than one-year.
Stockholders equity at March 31, 2005 was
approximately $114.7 million and included $1.0 million
of unrealized loss on available for sale securities and cash
flow hedges presented as accumulated other comprehensive income.
Stockholders equity at December 31, 2004 was
approximately $119.5 million and included $256,000 of
unrealized gain on available for sale securities and cash flow
hedges presented as accumulated other comprehensive income.
|
|
|
Comparison of the Three Months Ended March 31, 2005
to the Three Months Ended March 31, 2004. |
For the three months ended March 31, 2005, we had a net
loss of approximately $38,000 compared with net income of
$118,000 for the comparable period of 2004.
46
Our primary sources of revenue were gain on sale of mortgage
loans, fees from borrowers, fees earned on brokered loans,
interest earned on portfolio investments and interest earned on
mortgage loans held for sale during the interim period from
funding a loan to a borrower and the ultimate sale of the loan
to a third party. For the three months ended March 31,
2005, total revenues increased approximately 241.4% to
$23.9 million from $7.0 million for the same period in
2004, due in part to the SIB and GRL acquisitions.
Interest income from our portfolio investment activities
contributed approximately $14.5 million to total revenues
for the three months ended March 31, 2005. Interest income
from our portfolio investment activities began subsequent to our
IPO in June 2004 and thus was not a revenue source for the
three months ended March 31, 2004.
Loan originations for the three months ended March 31, 2005
increased to approximately $672.5 million from
$283.5 million for the same period of 2004. As a result,
for our mortgage origination operations segment for the three
month period ended March 31, 2005, total revenues increased
approximately 28.6% to $9.0 million from $7.0 million
for the same period in 2004. The increase in loan origination
volume and related revenues is due, in part, to new branches we
assumed from SIB Mortgage Corp., or SIB, in mid-March of
2004 and the assumption of branches from GRL in
mid-November 2004.
For the three months ended March 31, 2005, total pre-tax
operating expenses increased approximately 292.6% to
$26.7 million from $6.8 million for the same period in
2004. Interest expenses were higher for the first three months
of 2005, relative to the first three months of 2004 as a result
of the commencement of our portfolio investment strategy and the
financing, through repurchase arrangements, and the hedging of
$1.6 billion in mortgage-backed securities and mortgage
loans held in our portfolio. Overall general and administrative
expenses were higher for the first three months of 2005,
relative to the first three months of 2004, primarily from
increased occupancy and personnel costs associated with new
branch offices and satellite locations and increased personnel
costs associated with an expansion of NYMCs information
technology, accounting, operations and marketing departments in
connection with these new branches and locations. In addition,
during the three months ended March 31, 2005, a non-cash
charge of approximately $1.4 million in compensation
expense was recorded primarily for the prior issuance of
performance shares and accrued bonuses issued in connection with
our hiring and retainment of former GRL branch employees. As a
result of our acquisition of the GRL branches in mid-November
2004, we incurred upfront expenses, with little offsetting
revenues, through the mid-point of the first quarter due to lag
time in closing the new originations associated with the
assumption of these branches.
Aided in part by our acquisition of the SIB and GRL branches,
our closed loan originations for the three months ended
March 31, 2005 totaled 3,108 loans, a 190.2% increase over
the 1,071 loans that NYMC closed during the comparable period of
2004. The average size of a loan originated during the first
three months of 2005 was $216,000, an 18.5% decline from the
average of $265,000 during the same period of 2004. The increase
in the number of loan originations during the three month period
ended March 31, 2005 was due to increased loan origination
personnel and branch offices, including those personnel and
branch offices acquired in the SIB and GRL transactions, as
compared to the same period of 2004. This decrease in average
loan balance is attributable primarily to the low average loan
balance originated by one of the acquired SIB branches which
does a relatively high volume of low balance FHA streamline
refinance loans. In addition, with our increased geographic
diversity as a result of the SIB and GRL branch acquisitions we
are originating more loans outside of New York City.
We do not expect to benefit from historically low interest rates
in 2005. We expect to mitigate the predicted declines in loan
origination volume across the industry during the remainder of
2005 by increasing the percentage of market share we capture. We
plan to accomplish this increase in market share by increasing
our loan origination staff, as we did in 2004 when we hired 447
new employees in connection with our acquisition of SIB and GRL
branches. We cannot assure you, however, that an increase in the
number of loan origination officers we have will successfully
mitigate the decline in loan origination volume that is expected
to occur as a result of reduced demand for new loans throughout
the industry.
47
Gain on Sales of Mortgage Loans. During the three months
ended March 31, 2005, we had gains on sales of mortgage
loans of approximately $4.3 million compared to
$3.5 million for the same period of 2004. This 22.9%
increase is attributed in part to higher loan originations in
2005 and offset by a decreasing premium spread on loans sold.
During the three months ended March 31, 2005, market
conditions narrowed the average spread earned on the sale of
loans to third-parties narrowed by approximately 23 basis
points relative to the prior period.
Gain on sale revenues for the three months ended March 31,
2005 was also impacted by the execution of our core business
strategy: retaining selected adjustable rate mortgages for our
investment portfolio. The execution of this strategy, which
began in the third quarter of 2004 after our IPO, requires that
we forgo the gain on sale premiums (revenues) we would otherwise
receive when we sell these loans to third-parties. Instead, the
cost basis of these loans, which is far lower than the loan and
its associated third-party premium, is retained in our
investment portfolio with the inherent value of the loan
realized over time. For the three months ended March 31,
2005, we originated and retained $136.4 million of loans in
our investment portfolio and estimate that the forgone gain on
sale premium, net of the cost basis of these loans when retained
in our investment portfolio, was approximately $2.1 million.
The number of mortgage loans sold, excluding those loans
retained in our investment portfolio, during the three months
ended March 31, 2005 increased 171.2% to 2,292 loans from
845 mortgage loans sold during the comparable period in 2004
due, in part, to our acquisitions of SIB and GRL. Mortgage loan
volume, as measured by aggregate principal balance of mortgage
loans sold and excluding those loans retained for investment,
increased approximately 114.0% to $426.8 million for
the three months ended March 31, 2005 from
$199.4 million for the comparable period in 2004. The
increase in the number of mortgage loans sold during the three
month period ended March 31, 2005 was due to increased loan
origination personnel and branch offices as compared to the same
period of 2004.
Interest Income Mortgage Loans Held for Sale.
During the three months ended March 31, 2005, we had
interest income on loans that were held for sale of
approximately $2.6 million compared with interest income of
$1.3 million for the same period of 2004. This increase was
due to higher average daily balances on loans held for sale
during the period and an increasing average yield due to higher
prevailing interest rates in 2005 relative to 2004. For the
three months ended March 31, 2005, the average interest
rate for mortgage loans sold increased approximately
49 basis points to 6.25% from 5.76% for the comparable
period in 2004. This increase was consistent with the increases
in interest rates initiated by the Federal Reserve, but was not
reflective of the total interest rate increases initiated by the
Federal Reserve as we have seen the interest rate curve flatten
during the intervening period.
Interest Income Investment Securities and
Loans. The following table highlights the components of net
interest spread and the annualized yield on net interest-earning
assets as of the quarter end:
Components of Net Interest Spread and Yield on Net
Interest-Earning Assets
(Dollars in millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Historical | |
|
Yield on | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted | |
|
Interest | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average Interest | |
|
Average | |
|
Earning | |
|
Cost of | |
|
Net Interest | |
As of the Quarter Ended |
|
Earning Assets | |
|
Coupon | |
|
Assets | |
|
Funds | |
|
Spread | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Mar. 31, 2005
|
|
$ |
1,447.9 |
|
|
|
4.39 |
% |
|
|
4.01 |
% |
|
|
2.86 |
% |
|
|
1.15 |
% |
Dec. 31, 2004
|
|
$ |
1,325.7 |
|
|
|
4.29 |
% |
|
|
3.84 |
% |
|
|
2.58 |
% |
|
|
1.26 |
% |
Sept. 31, 2004
|
|
$ |
776.5 |
|
|
|
4.04 |
% |
|
|
3.86 |
% |
|
|
2.45 |
% |
|
|
1.41 |
% |
The yield on net earning assets is computed by dividing net
interest income by the average daily balance of interest earning
assets during the quarter. The yield reflects the amortization
costs of the mortgages as well as short-term investments during
the portfolio accumulation period. The cost of funds includes
the costs of hedging interest rate risk through interest rate
swaps and caps.
48
Brokered Loan Fees. During the three months ended
March 31, 2005, we had revenues from brokered loans of
approximately $2.0 million compared to $2.2 million
for the same period in 2004. The number of brokered loans
increased approximately 106.2% to 466 loans for the three months
ended March 31, 2005 from 226 loans for the comparable
period in 2004. The aggregate principal balance of such brokered
loans increased by approximately 30.1% to
$109.4 million for the three months ended March 31,
2005 from $84.1 million for the comparable period in 2004.
The slight decline in brokered loan fees relative to the
increases in brokered loan production was a function of lower
broker commissions earned due to spread tightening in the
industry during 2004.
Gain on Sale of Securities. During the three month period
ended March 31, 2005, we recognized a gain on the sale of
approximately $377,000 on the sale of $93.6 million of
residential mortgage-backed securities. These securities were
sold in order to rebalance our investment portfolio in
preparation of our securitization.
Salaries, Commissions and Benefits. During the three
months ended March 31, 2005, salaries, commissions and
associated payroll costs increased to $7.1 million from
$2.7 million for the same period of 2004, an increase of
163.0%. The increase was primarily due to the addition of
363 employees, bringing our total number of employees to
810 at March 31, 2005 from 447 employees at the end of
March 31, 2004. New employees include loan officers,
support staff (information technology, marketing, processing,
underwriting, accounting and closing employees) and additional
corporate management hired in connection with our transition to
a public REIT.
Brokered Loan Expenses. During three months ended
March 31, 2005, we had costs of brokered loans of
approximately $1.5 million as compared to $1.3 million
for the same period of 2004, an increase of 15.4%. These costs
generally correlate and are variable to the periods
increased brokered loan origination dollar volume. The ratio of
brokered loan expense relative to broker loan income is also
higher as a result of increased allocated payroll costs for the
three months ended March 31, 2005 relative to the same
period of 2004.
Interest Expense Mortgage Loans Held for
Sale. During the three months ended March 31, 2005, we
had interest expense on the warehouse financing lines for our
mortgage loans held for sale of approximately $1.8 million
compared with interest expense of $609,000 for the same period
of 2004, an increase of 195.6%. The average daily outstanding
balance of financing facilities for the three months ended
March 31, 2005 was $242.3 million at an average
interest rate of 3.30% as compared to an average daily
outstanding balance of $93.3 million at an average rate of
1.47% for the comparable period in 2004. Our financing
facilities are indexed at LIBOR.
Interest Expense Investment Securities and
Loans. During the three months ended March 31, 2005, we
had interest expense on our repurchase facilities that finance
our residential mortgage-backed securities portfolio of
approximately $9.8 million. Because we executed our
business strategy of procuring an initial portfolio of such
securities commencing with the third quarter of 2004 we had no
such interest expense during the three months ended
March 31, 2004.
Occupancy and Equipment Expense. During the three months
ended March 31, 2005, we had occupancy and equipment
expense of approximately $2.1 million compared to $662,000
for the same period of 2004, an increase of 217.2%. This
increase was partially due to a non-cash charge-off of
approximately $796,000 related to our sub-let of our old
headquarters on Park Avenue. After consideration of various
alternatives we decided to discontinue our remaining use of
these premises in March 2005. The sub-lease terms are below our
current contractual obligation for the premises and the full
difference was expensed during the three months ended
March 31, 2005. In addition, the increase reflects the
expansion of new origination offices and satellite locations to
63 as of March 31, 2005 from 24 as of March 31, 2004.
Marketing and Promotion Expense. During the three months
ended March 31, 2005, we had marketing and promotion
expense of $1.4 million compared to $484,000 for the same
period of 2004, an increase of 189.3%. This increase was
primarily due to increased marketing and promotion expenses
incurred to promote
49
newly-opened loan origination offices and related newly-hired
loan origination personnel, particularly related to our
acquisition of the GRL branches in mid-November 2004.
Data Processing and Communications Expense. During the
three months ended March 31, 2005, we had data processing
and communications expense of $518,000 compared to $168,000 for
the same period of 2004, an increase of 208.3%. This increase
was primarily due to increased personnel and expenses related to
the acquisition of the GRL branches in mid-November 2004 and the
recent upgrades/purchases of software licenses, communications
portals and other technology expenses. In addition, during the
third quarter of 2004, we began to incur additional costs
related to new loan operating system software, and have been
continually upgrading our support systems and ancillary software
and licenses to accommodate the full implementation of the new
system by the end of 2005.
Office Supplies and Expense. During the three months
ended March 31, 2005, we had data office supplies and
expense of $573,000 compared to $218,000 for the same period of
2004, an increase of 162.8%. This increase was primarily a
result of the increase in personnel and new origination offices
and satellite locations, as well as the supplies needed to
accommodate the bulk hiring of new employees formerly with GRL
as well as other incremental employees hired during the period.
Professional Fees Expense. During the three months ended
March 31, 2005, we had professional fees expense of
$744,000 compared to $253,000 for the same period of 2004, an
increase of 194.1%. This increase was primarily due to increases
in employment placement fees and increases in dues, licenses and
permits in states where NYMC has a new presence and the use of
regulatory counsel to assist in the structuring and licensing of
our various affiliates in certain states.
Other Expenses. During the three months ended
March 31, 2005, we had other expenses of approximately
$377,000 compared to $160,000 for the same period of 2004 an
increase of 135.6% generally related to overall corporate growth.
|
|
|
Comparison of the Year Ended December 31, 2004 to the
Year Ended December 31, 2003 |
For the year ended December 31, 2004, we had net income of
approximately $4.9 million compared with net income of
$13.7 million for 2003.
Our primary sources of revenue were gain on sale of mortgage
loans, fees from borrowers, fees earned on brokered loans,
interest earned on portfolio investments and interest earned on
mortgage loans held for sale during the interim period from
funding a loan to a borrower and the ultimate sale of the loan
to a third party. For the year ended December 31, 2004,
total revenues increased approximately 49.7% to
$56.0 million from $37.4 million for 2003.
Interest income from our portfolio investment activities
contributed approximately $20.4 million to total revenues
for the year ended December 31, 2004. The third quarter of
2004 was the first quarter in which we began the execution of
our portfolio investment strategy.
Loan originations for the year ended December 31, 2004
increased to approximately $1.85 billion from
$1.60 billion for 2003. The closing of a non-recurring mass
closing of 347 condominium mortgage loans for the Ruppert Homes
Project in the first quarter of 2003 favorably skewed the
results of our gain on sale revenue in the first half of 2003
relative to the first half of 2004. In addition, some of the new
branches we assumed from SIB Mortgage Corp., or SIB, in
mid-March of 2004 do not charge closing costs on FHA mortgages,
which reduces the fee revenue we typically would earn had these
loans been other than FHA mortgage loans. During December 2004,
loan originations increased due to our acquisition of GRL
branches and their employees and a related loan origination
pipeline of approximately $300 million.
For the year ended December 31, 2004, total operating
expenses before taxes increased approximately 121.6% to
$52.3 million from $23.6 million for 2003. Interest
expenses were higher for the year ended December 31, 2004,
relative to the prior year as a result of the commencement of
our portfolio investment strategy and the financing, through
repurchase arrangements, and the hedging, of the
$1.2 billion in mortgage
50
securities held in our portfolio. Overall general and
administrative expenses were higher for the year ended
December 31, 2004, relative to the prior year, primarily
from increased occupancy costs associated with NYMCs
relocation to a new corporate headquarters, increased personnel
costs associated with an expansion of NYMCs information
technology, accounting, operations and marketing departments in
connection with our IPO, and a non-cash charge of approximately
$2.0 million in compensation expense for restricted shares
of our common stock issued in connection with our IPO and the
issuance of performance shares to GRL employees for retention
and incentive compensation for meeting certain production
benchmarks as a result of our acquisition of 15 GRL branches in
November 2004. In addition, we had increased personnel,
occupancy and promotional expenses relating to the acquisition
of 23 loan origination branches from GRL and our hiring of an
additional 134 employees in March 2004 and 275 employees in
November 2004 from GRL for which we incurred
expenses with little offsetting revenues due to lag time in
closing the new originations associated with the acquisition of
these branches and employees. In addition, during the third
quarter of 2004, we began to incur additional expenses in order
to improve and grow our operational infrastructure (increased
data processing and software costs for new systems and
analytical software for the mortgage securities business as well
as higher general and administrative expenses) to accommodate
our increased production capacity. The GRL transaction alone is
expected to approximately double our current origination volume
during 2005.
Aided in part by our acquisition of the SIB and GRL branches,
our closed loan originations for the year ended
December 31, 2004 totaled 8,053 loans, a 41.2% increase
over the 5,704 loans that NYMC closed during 2003. As measured
by principal balance, total closed loan originations for the
year ended December 31, 2004 increased approximately 15.6%
to $1.85 billion from $1.60 billion during 2003,
reflecting a decrease in the average balance of loans originated
to approximately $229,000 in 2004 from $281,000 in 2003. The
increase in loan originations during the year ended
December 31, 2004 is due to increased loan origination
personnel and branch offices, including those personnel and
branch offices acquired in the SIB and GRL transactions, as
compared to 2003. The decrease in average loan balance is
attributable primarily to the low average loan balance
originated by one of the acquired SIB branches which does a
relatively high volume of low balance FHA streamline refinance
loans as compared to the historic loan production of NYMC in
2003.
Gain on Sales of Mortgage Loans. During the year ended
December 31, 2004, we had gains on sales of mortgage loans
of approximately $20.8 million compared to
$23.0 million for 2003. The 9.6% decrease in the gains on
sales of mortgage loans for the year ended December 31,
2004 as compared to 2003 is attributed, in part, to a tightening
of approximately 40 basis points on gain on sale spreads
during 2004 relative to 2003, higher margins on loans originated
for the Ruppert Homes Project in 2003 (as a result of a
predictable closing date and a mass closing, we were able to
sell these loans primarily in mandatory or bulk
sales which provides for a higher premium relative to best
effort or flow sales) and lower fee revenue from an
increase in FHA mortgage loan production for which we incur
closing costs rather than the borrower (since our assumption of
the SIB branches in March 2004, approximately 15% of our total
loan originations per month are FHA loans). The decrease in gain
on sale revenues was also impacted by the initial execution of
our core business strategy following our IPO in June 2004:
retaining selected adjustable rate mortgages for our investment
portfolio. The execution of this strategy requires that we forgo
the gain on sale premiums (revenues) we would otherwise
receive when we sell these loans to third-parties. Instead, the
cost basis of these loans, which is far lower than the loan and
its associated third-party premium, is retained in our
investment portfolio with the inherent value of the loan
realized over time.
The number of mortgage loans sold during the year ended
December 31, 2004 increased 44.3% to 6,881 loans from 4,770
mortgage loans sold during 2003. Mortgage loan volume, as
measured by aggregate principal balance of mortgage loans sold,
increased approximately 17.1% to $1.4 billion for the year
ended December 31, 2004 from $1.2 billion for the
comparable period in 2003. The increase in the number of
mortgage loans sold during the year ended December 31, 2004
was due to increased loan origination personnel and branch
offices as compared to 2003. The slighter increase in the
mortgage loan volume as measured by principal balance was due to
higher FHA loan volumes which have an average balance of
approximately
51
$125,000 as compared to the average balance of approximately
$209,000 for all other loans sold during the year ended
December 31, 2004.
Interest Income Mortgage Loans Held for Sale.
During the year ended December 31, 2004, we had interest
income on loans that were held for sale of approximately
$6.9 million compared with interest income of
$7.6 million for 2003. This decrease was due to a lower
weighted average of days that loans were held prior to sale to
third parties offset by a slightly higher average yield due to
higher prevailing interest rates relative to 2003. For the year
ended December 31, 2004, the average number of days a loan
was held prior to sale to a third party was 30 days as
compared to 34 days for 2003. For the year ended
December 31, 2004, the average interest rate for mortgage
loans sold increased to 5.76% from 5.73% for 2003.
Interest Income Investment Securities and
Loans. The following table highlights the components of net
interest spread and the annualized yield on net interest-earning
assets as of each applicable quarter end since we began our
portfolio investment activities:
Components of Net Interest Spread and Yield on Net
Interest-Earning Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Historical | |
|
Yield on | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted | |
|
Interest | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average Interest | |
|
Average | |
|
Earning | |
|
Cost of | |
|
Net Interest | |
As of the Quarter Ended |
|
Earning Assets | |
|
Coupon | |
|
Assets | |
|
Funds | |
|
Spread | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Dollar amounts in millions) | |
September 30, 2004
|
|
$ |
776.5 |
|
|
|
4.04% |
|
|
|
3.86% |
|
|
|
2.45% |
|
|
|
1.41% |
|
December 31, 2004
|
|
$ |
1,325.7 |
|
|
|
4.29% |
|
|
|
3.84% |
|
|
|
2.58% |
|
|
|
1.26% |
|
As of December 31, 2004 the current yield our the
investment portfolio, including mortgage securities and loans
held for investment is approximately 3.93%; the related cost of
funds including hedges totaled 2.73% resulting in a current net
spread of 1.20%.
Brokered Loan Fees. During the year ended
December 31, 2004, we had revenues from brokered loans of
approximately $6.9 million compared to $6.7 million
for 2003. The number of brokered loans increased approximately
25.5% to 1,171 loans for the year ended December 31, 2004
from 934 loans for 2003. The aggregate principal balance of such
brokered loans increased by approximately 12.2% to
$410.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2004
from $365.5 million in 2003. The slight increase in
brokered loan fees relative to the increase in brokered loan
production was a function of lower broker commissions earned due
to spread tightening in the industry during 2004.
Gain on Sale of Securities. During the year ended
December 31, 2004, we realized gains on the sale of
marketable securities of $774,000 as compared to no loss or gain
on the sale of marketable securities during 2003. Of this
amount, a net gain of $607,000 was realized in the second
quarter due to the disposition of marketable securities in
anticipation of our IPO so as to avoid owning a legacy portfolio
of securities which (i) did not meet our new investment
guidelines, (ii) were equity securities, (iii) could
not be appropriately hedged or (iv) did not generate
qualified REIT income.
Salaries, Commissions and Benefits. During the year ended
December 31, 2004, salaries, commissions and associated
payroll costs increased to $17.1 million from
$9.2 million for 2003, an increase of 85.9%. The increase
was primarily due to the addition of an increase of 447
employees bringing our total employees to 782 employees at the
end of December 31, 2004 from 335 employees at the end of
December 31, 2003. New employees include loan officers,
support staff (information technology, marketing, processing,
underwriting and closing employees) and additional corporate
management hired in connection with our transition to a public
company. In addition, for the year ended December 31, 2004,
we recognized approximately $2.0 million in non-cash
compensation expense related to restricted stock grants to our
executive officers in connection with our IPO and performance
shares and options granted to new GRL employees for retention
and incentive compensation for meeting certain future loan
origination production benchmarks.
52
Brokered Loan Expenses. During the year ended
December 31, 2004, we had costs of brokered loans of
approximately $5.3 million as compared to $3.7 million
for 2003, an increase of 43.2%. The increase was due to
increased brokered loan origination volume and the increased
cost during 2004 of brokered loan originations, particularly
payroll related costs.
Interest Expense Mortgage Loans Held for
Sale. During the year ended December 31, 2004, we had
interest expense on the warehouse financing lines for our
mortgage loans held for sale of approximately $3.5 million
compared with interest expense of $3.3 million for 2003, an
increase of 6.1%. The average daily outstanding balance of
financing facilities for the year ended December 31, 2004
was $136.3 million at an average interest rate of 2.65% as
compared to an average daily outstanding balance of
$116.6 million at an average rate of 2.54% for 2003. Our
financing facilities are indexed at LIBOR. The slightly higher
average in 2004 was primarily attributable to a higher relative
change in the LIBOR index to 2.29% at December 31, 2004
from 1.17% at December 31, 2003 and was mitigated by the
lower spread over the index rate negotiated on new and renewed
facilities during 2004 relative to 2003. We had no such interest
expense in 2003.
Interest Expense Investment Securities and
Loans. During the year ended December 31, 2004 we had
interest expense on our repurchase facilities that finance our
residential mortgage backed securities portfolio including net
interest expense from hedging of approximately
$12.5 million. We had no such interest expense in 2003.
Occupancy and Equipment Expense. During the year ended
December 31, 2004, we had occupancy and equipment expense
of approximately $3.5 million compared to $2.0 million
for 2003, an increase of 75.0%. The increase reflects the
expansion of new offices to 34 full service origination offices
and 32 satellite locations (66 locations in total) as of
December 31, 2004 from a total of 15 locations as of
December 31, 2003 and the significant expansion and
relocation of NYMCs principal offices in New York City in
July 2003 and the recent relocation and expansion of our
Astoria, Queens office in June 2004.
Marketing and Promotion Expense. During the year ended
December 31, 2004, we had marketing and promotion expense
of $3.2 million compared to $1.0 million for the same
period of 2003, an increase of 220.0%. This increase was
primarily due to increased marketing and promotion expenses
incurred to promote newly-opened loan origination offices and
related newly-hired loan origination personnel. In addition, in
connection with our acquisition of the SIB and GRL branches, we
undertook a significant direct mail campaign to market our loan
products in 2004.
Data Processing and Communications Expense. During the
year ended December 31, 2004, we had data processing and
communications expense of $1.6 million compared to $608,000
for 2003, an increase of 163.2%. This increase was primarily due
to increased personnel and expenses related to the opening of
new loan origination offices. In addition, since June 30,
2003, NYMC entered into leases for its new principal office
phone system and high speed office printers. During the second
and third quarter of 2004, we incurred additional costs related
to analytical and market research software and systems in order
to accommodate our mortgage securities business and to upgrade
our current loan accounting software. In addition, during the
third quarter of 2004, we began to incur additional costs
related to new loan operating system software.
Office Supplies and Expense. During the year ended
December 31, 2004, we had office supplies and expenses of
$1.5 million compared to $803,000 for the same period of
2003, an increase of 86.8%. This increase was primarily a result
of the increase in personnel and new origination offices, as
well as the supplies needed to accommodate the bulk hiring of
134 and 275 new employees formerly with SIB and GRL,
respectively, as well as other incremental employees hired
during 2004.
Professional Fees Expense. During the year ended
December 31, 2004, we had professional fees expense of
$2.0 million compared to $959,000 for 2003, an increase of
108.6%. This increase was primarily due to increases in dues,
licenses and permits in states where NYMC has a new presence and
the use of regulatory counsel to assist in the structuring and
licensing of our various affiliates in certain states in
conjunction with our IPO.
53
Travel and Entertainment Expense. During the year ended
December 31, 2004, we had travel and entertainment expense
of $612,000 compared to $666,000 for 2003, a decrease of 8.1%.
The decrease was primarily due to new expense guidelines and
less travel for conventions and other activities.
Depreciation and Amortization Expense. During the year
ended December 31, 2004, we had depreciation and
amortization expense of $690,000 compared to $412,000 for 2003,
an increase of 67.5%. This increase was primarily due to opening
of new origination offices and increased investments in computer
networks and systems.
|
|
|
Comparison of the Year Ended December 31, 2003 to the
Year Ended December 31, 2002 |
Net income increased approximately 260.5% to $13.7 million
for the year ended December 31, 2003 from $3.8 million
for 2002. The increase in net income in 2003 was primarily the
result of increased loan origination production resulting in
increased loan sales volume and net interest income. Two primary
factors contributed to this increase in loan origination
production: a successful effort by NYMC to increase
significantly its loan origination staff and low prevailing
interest rates, which resulted in an increase in refinance
mortgage loan volume. Total revenue increased 106.5% with a
corresponding 65.0% increase in total expenses during the year
ended December 31, 2003, as compared to 2002, indicating
loan origination efficiencies at higher production volumes.
Total loan origination volume for the year ended
December 31, 2003 increased 76.0% to 5,704 loans from 3,241
for 2002. Total loan origination volume, as measured by
principal balance, increased approximately 82.4% to
$1.6 billion for the year ended December 31, 2003 from
$877.2 million for 2002.
Gain on Sales of Mortgage Loans. Net gain on sales of
mortgage loans increased approximately 132.3% to
$23.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2003
from $9.9 million for 2002. Gross gain on sale of mortgage
loans increased approximately 116.1% to $29.6 million for
the year ended December 31, 2003 from $13.7 million
for 2002. These increases in net and gross gain on sales of
mortgage loans are due to increased sales volume of loans for
the year ended December 31, 2003 and due to the fact that
increased mortgage loan origination volume enabled NYMC to begin
selling pools of loans, typically resulting in NYMC receiving
higher prices than it historically received selling loans on a
whole loan or flow basis.
The number of mortgage loans sold during the year ended
December 31, 2003 increased 83.5% to 4,770 loans from 2,600
mortgage loans sold during 2002. Mortgage loan volume, as
measured by aggregate principal balance of mortgage loans sold,
increased approximately 89.5% to $1.2 billion for the year
ended December 31, 2003 from $633.2 million for 2002.
Interest Income. Interest income increased approximately
153.3% to $7.6 million for the year ended December 31,
2003 from $3.0 million in 2002. This increase is due to
increased originations of loans held for sale and thus an
increased volume of earning assets and is partially offset by a
declining average yield due to lower prevailing interest rates
in the year ended December 31, 2003.
The aggregate principal balance of loans sold increased
approximately 89.5% to $1.2 billion for the year ended
December 31, 2003 from $633.2 million in 2002.
Additionally, NYMCs loan pool sale strategy resulted in
NYMC holding loans longer on its credit facilities. The average
holding period of mortgage loans sold (the period from the
closing of the loan to the sale to a third party) increased to
34 days in the year ended December 31, 2003 from
31 days in 2002. The combination of increased principal
balances and holding periods allowed for higher interest revenue
during the year ended December 31, 2003 and is offset in
part by a decrease in the average interest rate for the mortgage
loans sold by approximately 75 basis points to 5.73% in
2003 from 6.48% in 2002.
Revenue from Brokered Loans. Revenue from brokered loans
increased approximately 28.8% to $6.7 million for the year
ended December 31, 2003 from $5.2 million in 2002 as a
result of increased origination volume for loans brokered for
other institutions. The number of brokered loans increased
approximately 45.7% to 934 loans for the year ended
December 31, 2003 from 641 loans in 2002. The
54
aggregate principal balance of such brokered loans increased
approximately 49.8% to $365.5 million for the year ended
December 31, 2003 from $244.0 million in 2002. The
percentage of brokered loans to total originations closed during
the year end December 31, 2003 decreased to 16.4% from
19.8% in 2002. This was due to NYMCs efforts to migrate
more of its business from mortgage brokering to mortgage
banking, which typically has been significantly more profitable.
Total Expenses. Total expenses increased approximately
65.0% to $23.6 million for the year ended December 31,
2003 from $14.3 million in 2002. This increase is primarily
due to the increase in salaries, commissions and associated
payroll costs, much of which is a variable cost
(commissions) and directly related to the increase in loan
originations. Occupancy and other general and administrative
expenses also increased due to higher loan origination volume
and an increase in the number of branch locations.
Salaries, Commissions and Benefits. Salaries, commissions
and associated payroll costs increased approximately 58.6% to
$9.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2003 from
$5.8 million in 2002. The increase was primarily due to an
increase in commissions paid, which is a variable expense, and
directly correlated to increased loan origination volume, as
well as increases in support staff (processing, underwriting and
closing employees) necessary to support the increased
origination volume. Total employees increased to 335 on
December 31, 2003 from 184 on December 31, 2002.
Cost of Brokered Loans. Cost of brokered loans increased
approximately 23.3% to $3.7 million for the year ended
December 31, 2003 from $3.0 million in 2002. This
increase in cost correlates to the increase in origination
volume of brokered loans and the revenues earned from brokered
loans.
Interest Expense. Interest expense increased
approximately 94.1% to $3.3 million for the year ended
December 31, 2003 from $1.7 million in 2002. This
increase is due to increased originations of loans held for sale
and the period of time NYMC elected to hold such loans prior to
their sale and thus an increase in financing costs, which is
partially offset by lower prevailing interest rates in the year
ended December 31, 2003. The average monthly outstanding
balance of financing facilities during the year ended
December 31, 2003 was $116.6 million at an average
interest rate of 2.54% as compared to an average monthly
outstanding balance of $48.8 million at an average rate of
3.17% in 2002.
Occupancy and Equipment Expense. Occupancy and equipment
expense increased approximately 100.0% to $2.0 million for
the year ended December 31, 2003 from $1.0 million in
2002. The increase reflects the expansion of new origination
offices to 15 on December 31, 2003 from 13 on
December 31, 2002 and the significant expansion and
relocation of NYMCs principal offices in New York City in
July 2003.
Marketing and Promotion Expense. Marketing and promotion
expense increased approximately 104.9% to $1.0 million for
the year ended December 31, 2003 from $488,000 in 2002.
This increase was primarily due to increased marketing and
promotion expenses incurred to promote newly-opened loan
origination offices and related newly-hired loan origination
personnel.
Data Processing and Communication Expense. Data
processing and communication expense increased approximately
66.1% to $608,000 for the year ended December 31, 2003 from
$366,000 in 2002. This increase was primarily due to increased
loan volume and expenses related to the opening of new
origination offices. In addition, during the year ended
December 31, 2003, NYMC entered into leases for its new
principal office phone system and high speed office printers.
Office Supplies and Expense. Office supplies and expense
increased approximately 59.0% to $803,000 for the year ended
December 31, 2003 from $505,000 in 2002. This increase was
primarily a result of the increase in personnel and new
origination offices, as well as the supplies needed to service
increased loan volume during the period.
Professional Fees Expense. Professional fees expense
increased approximately 88.0% to $959,000 for the year ended
December 31, 2003 from $510,000 in 2002. This increase was
primarily due to increases in dues, licenses and permits and
placement search fees for increased personnel levels and the
opening of new
55
loan origination offices. In addition, NYMC incurred certain
non-recurring professional fees (consulting, technology,
architectural) for its relocation of its principal offices.
Travel and Entertainment Expense. Travel and
entertainment expense increased 58.6% to $666,000 for the year
ended December 31, 2003 from $420,000 in 2002. This
increase was primarily due to increased meals and travel expense
due to increased personnel levels and the opening of new
origination offices.
Depreciation and Amortization Expense. Depreciation and
amortization expense increased approximately 52.0% to $412,000
for the year ended December 31, 2003 from $271,000 in 2002.
This increase was primarily due to opening of new origination
offices and increased investments in computer networks and
systems.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
Since inception, we have not maintained any relationships with
unconsolidated entities or financial partnerships, such as
entities often referred to as structured finance or special
purpose entities, established for the purpose of facilitating
off-balance sheet arrangements or other contractually narrow or
limited purposes. Further, we have not guaranteed any
obligations of unconsolidated entities nor do we have any
commitment or intent to provide funding to any such entities.
Accordingly, we are not materially exposed to any market,
credit, liquidity or financing risk that could arise if we had
engaged in such relationships.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Liquidity is a measure of our ability to meet potential cash
requirements, including ongoing commitments to repay borrowings,
fund and maintain investments, pay dividends to our stockholders
and other general business needs. We recognize the need to have
funds available for our operating businesses and our investment
in mortgage loans until the settlement or sale of mortgages with
us or with other investors. It is our policy to have adequate
liquidity at all times to cover normal cyclical swings in
funding availability and mortgage demand and to allow us to meet
abnormal and unexpected funding requirements. We plan to meet
liquidity through normal operations with the goal of avoiding
unplanned sales of assets or emergency borrowing of funds.
We believe our existing cash balances and funds available under
our credit facilities and cash flows from operations will be
sufficient for our liquidity requirements for at least the next
12 months. Unused borrowing capacity will vary as the
market values of our securities vary. Our investments and assets
will also generate liquidity on an ongoing basis through
mortgage principal and interest payments, pre-payments and net
earnings held prior to payment of dividends. Should our
liquidity needs ever exceed these on-going or immediate sources
of liquidity discussed above, we believe that our securities
could be sold to raise additional cash in most circumstances. We
do, however, expect to expand our mortgage origination
operations and may have to arrange for additional sources of
capital through the issuance of debt or equity or additional
bank borrowings to fund that expansion. We currently have no
commitments for any additional financings, and we cannot ensure
that we will be able to obtain any additional financing at the
times required and on terms and conditions acceptable to us.
To finance our investment portfolio, we generally seek to borrow
between eight and 12 times the amount of our equity. Our
leverage ratio, defined as total financing facilities, less
subordinated debentures outstanding, divided by total
stockholders equity, plus subordinated debentures
outstanding at March 31, 2005 was 12.1. We, and the
providers of our finance facilities, generally view our
subordinated debentures as a form of equity.
Since our IPO, we have purchased approximately $1.2 billion
in mortgage-backed securities. These securities were financed
with a combination of IPO proceeds and repurchase agreements. As
of March 31, 2005, we had approximately $1.4 billion
in outstanding repurchase agreements.
We have arrangements to enter into repurchase agreements, a form
of collateralized short-term borrowing, with 21 different
financial institutions and, as of March 31, 2005, had
borrowed money from seven
56
of these firms. These agreements are secured by our
mortgage-backed securities and bear interest rates that have
historically moved in close relationship to LIBOR.
Under these repurchase agreements the financial institutions
lend money versus the market value of our mortgage-backed
securities portfolio, and, accordingly, an increase in interest
rates can have a negative impact on the valuation of these
securities, resulting in a potential margin call from the
financial institution. We monitor the market valuation
fluctuation as well as other liquidity needs to ensure there is
adequate collateral available to meet any additional margin
calls or liquidity requirements.
We enter into interest rate swap agreements to extend the
maturity of the repurchase agreements as a mechanism to reduce
the interest rate risk of the securities portfolio. As of
March 31, 2005, we had $735 million in interest rate
swaps outstanding with five different financial institutions.
The weighted average maturity of the swaps is 577 days as
of March 31, 2005. The impact of the interest swaps extends
the maturity of the repurchase agreements to one year.
To originate a mortgage loan, we may draw against a
$200 million repurchase facility with Credit Suisse First
Boston Mortgage Capital, LLC, or CSFB, and a $150 million
warehouse facility led by HSBC Bank USA, or HSBC. These
facilities are secured by the mortgage loans owned by us and by
certain of our other assets. Advances drawn under these
facilities bear interest at rates that vary depending on the
type of mortgage loans securing the advances. These facilities
are subject to sub-limits, advance rates and terms that vary
depending on the type of mortgage loans securing these
financings and the ratio of our liabilities to our tangible net
worth. As of March 31, 2005, the aggregate outstanding
balance under these facilities was $174.0 million and the
aggregate maximum amount available was $176.0 million.
These agreements are not committed facilities and may be
terminated at any time at the discretion of the counterparties.
In addition to these facilities, we entered into a
$250 million master loan and security agreement with
Greenwich Capital. Under this agreement, Greenwich Capital
provides financing to us for the origination or acquisition of
certain mortgage loans, which then will be sold to third parties
or contributed for future securitization to one or more trusts
or other entities sponsored by us or an affiliate. We will repay
advances under this credit facility with a portion of the
proceeds from the sale of all mortgage-backed securities issued
by the trust or other entity, along with a portion of the
proceeds resulting from permitted whole loan sales. Advances
under this facility bear interest at a floating rate initially
equal to LIBOR plus 0.75%. Advances under this facility are
subject to lender approval of the mortgage loans intended for
origination or acquisition, advance rates and the then ratio of
our liabilities to our tangible net worth. This facility is not
a committed facility and may be terminated at any time at the
discretion of Greenwich Capital. As of March 31, 2005 the
outstanding balance of this facility was approximately
$97.7 million with the maximum amount available for
additional borrowings of $152.3 million.
The documents governing these facilities contain a number of
compensating balance requirements and restrictive financial and
other covenants that, among other things, require us to maintain
a maximum ratio of total liabilities to tangible net worth, of
20 to 1 in the case of the CSFB facility, 15 to 1 in the case of
the HSBC facility and 20 to 1 in the case of the Greenwich
Capital facility, as well as to comply with applicable
regulatory and investor requirements. These facilities also
contain various covenants pertaining to, among other things, the
maintenance of certain periodic income thresholds and working
capital. As of March 31, 2005, NYMC was not in compliance
with the net income covenant on the CSFB and Greenwich Capital
facilities and the net worth covenant on the HSBC facility.
Waivers from the lenders with respect to these covenant
violations have been obtained.
The agreements also contain covenants limiting the ability of
our subsidiaries to:
|
|
|
|
|
transfer or sell assets; |
|
|
|
create liens on the collateral; or |
|
|
|
incur additional indebtedness, without obtaining the prior
consent of the lenders, which consent may not be unreasonably
withheld. |
57
These limits may in turn restrict our ability to pay cash or
stock dividends on our stock. In addition, under our warehouse
facilities, we cannot continue to finance a mortgage loan that
we hold through the warehouse facility if:
|
|
|
|
|
the loan is rejected as unsatisfactory for purchase
by the ultimate investor and has exceeded its permissible
warehouse period which varies by facility; |
|
|
|
we fail to deliver the applicable note, mortgage or other
documents evidencing the loan within the requisite time period; |
|
|
|
the underlying property that secures the loan has sustained a
casualty loss in excess of 5% of its appraised value; or |
|
|
|
the loan ceases to be an eligible loan (as determined pursuant
to the warehouse facility agreement). |
We expect that these credit facilities will be sufficient to
meet our capital and financing needs during the next twelve
months. The balances of these facilities fluctuate based on the
timing of our loan closings (at which point we may draw upon the
facilities) and the near-term subsequent sale of these loans to
third parties or the alternative financing thereof through
repurchase agreements or, in the future, securitizations for
mortgage loans we intend to retain (at which point these
facilities are paid down). The current availability under these
facilities and our current and projected levels of loan
origination volume are consistent with our historic ability to
manage our pipeline of mortgage loans, the subsequent sale
thereof and the related pay down of the facilities.
As of March 31, 2005, our aggregate warehouse and
repurchase facility borrowings under these facilities were
$271.7 million and $1.4 billion, respectively, at an
average rate of approximately 3.30%.
Our financing arrangements are short-term facilities secured by
the underlying investment in residential mortgage loans, the
value of which may move inversely with changes in interest
rates. A decline in the market value of our investments in the
future may limit our ability to borrow under these facilities or
result in lenders requiring additional collateral or initiating
margin calls under our repurchase agreements. As a result, we
could be required to sell some of our investments under adverse
market conditions in order to maintain liquidity. If such sales
are made at prices lower than the amortized costs of such
investments, we will incur losses.
Our ability to originate loans depends in large part on our
ability to sell the mortgage loans we originate at cost or for a
premium in the secondary market so that we may generate cash
proceeds to repay borrowings under our warehouse facilities and
our repurchase agreement. The value of our loans depends on a
number of factors, including:
|
|
|
|
|
interest rates on our loans compared to market interest rates; |
|
|
|
the borrower credit risk classification; |
|
|
|
loan-to-value ratios, loan terms, underwriting and
documentation; and |
|
|
|
general economic conditions. |
We make certain representations and warranties, and are subject
to various affirmative and negative financial and other
covenants, under the agreements covering the sale of our
mortgage loans regarding, among other things, the loans
compliance with laws and regulations, their conformity with the
ultimate investors underwriting standards and the accuracy
of information. In the event of a breach of these
representations, warranties or covenants or in the event of an
early payment default, we may be required to repurchase the
loans and indemnify the loan purchaser for damages caused by
that breach. We have implemented strict procedures to ensure
quality control and conformity to underwriting standards and
minimize the risk of being required to repurchase loans. We have
been required to repurchase loans we have sold from time to
time; however, these repurchases have not had a material impact
on our results of operations.
We intend to make distributions to our stockholders to comply
with the various requirements to maintain our REIT status and to
minimize or avoid corporate income tax and the nondeductible
excise tax. However, differences in timing between the
recognition of REIT taxable income and the actual receipt of
cash could
58
require us to sell assets or to borrow funds on a short-term
basis to meet the REIT distribution requirements and to avoid
corporate income tax and the nondeductible excise tax.
Certain of our assets may generate substantial mismatches
between REIT taxable income and available cash. These assets
could include mortgage-backed securities we hold that have been
issued at a discount and require the accrual of taxable income
in advance of the receipt of cash. As a result, our REIT taxable
income may exceed our cash available for distribution and the
requirement to distribute a substantial portion of our net
taxable income could cause us to:
|
|
|
|
|
sell assets in adverse market conditions; |
|
|
|
borrow on unfavorable terms; or |
|
|
|
distribute amounts that would otherwise be invested in future
acquisitions, capital expenditures or repayment of debt, |
in order to comply with the REIT distribution requirements.
Inflation
For the periods presented herein, inflation has been relatively
low and we believe that inflation has not had a material effect
on our results of operations. The impact of inflation is
primarily reflected in the increased costs of our operations.
Virtually all our assets and liabilities are financial in
nature. Our consolidated financial statements and corresponding
notes thereto have been prepared in accordance with GAAP, which
require the measurement of financial position and operating
results in terms of historical dollars without considering the
changes in the relative purchasing power of money over time due
to inflation. As a result, interest rates and other factors
influence our performance far more than inflation. Inflation
affects our operations primarily through its effect on interest
rates, since interest rates typically increase during periods of
high inflation and decrease during periods of low inflation.
During periods of increasing interest rates, demand for
mortgages and a borrowers ability to qualify for mortgage
financing in a purchase transaction may be adversely affected.
During periods of decreasing interest rates, borrowers may
prepay their mortgages, which in turn may adversely affect our
yield and subsequently the value of our portfolio of mortgage
assets.
Contractual Obligations
We had the following contractual obligations (excluding
derivative financial instruments) at March 31, 2005:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less Than | |
|
1 to 3 | |
|
4 to 5 | |
|
After 5 | |
|
|
Total | |
|
1 Year | |
|
Years | |
|
Years | |
|
Years | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Repurchase agreements
|
|
$ |
1,423,641,000 |
|
|
$ |
1,423,641,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Warehouse facilities
|
|
|
271,664,999 |
|
|
|
271,664,999 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating leases
|
|
|
17,473,990 |
|
|
|
4,150,604 |
|
|
$ |
6,699,940 |
|
|
$ |
4,745,446 |
|
|
$ |
1,878,000 |
|
Employment agreements(1)
|
|
|
9,521,900 |
|
|
|
2,209,200 |
|
|
|
7,312,700 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) Represents base cash compensation of executive officers.
New Accounting Pronouncements
In March 2004, the EITF reached a consensus on Issue No 03-1,
The Meaning of Other-Than-Temporary Impairment and Its
Application to Certain Investments. This Issue provides
clarification with respect to the meaning of
other-than-temporary impairment and its application to
investments classified as either available-for-sale or
held-to-maturity under SFAS No. 115, Accounting for
Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities,
(including individual securities and investments in mutual
funds), and investments accounted for under the cost method. The
guidance for evaluating whether an investment is
other-than-temporarily impaired in EITF 03-1, except for
paragraphs 10-20, must be applied in other-than-temporary
59
impairment evaluations made in reporting periods beginning after
June 15, 2004. This Issue did not have a material impact on
our consolidated financial statements.
QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
Market risk is the exposure to loss resulting from changes in
interest rates, credit spreads, foreign currency exchange rates,
commodity prices and equity prices. Because we are invested
solely in U.S.-dollar denominated instruments, primarily
residential mortgage instruments, and our borrowings are also
domestic and U.S. dollar denominated, we are not subject to
foreign currency exchange, or commodity and equity price risk;
the primary market risk that we are exposed to is interest rate
risk and its related ancillary risks. Interest rate risk is
highly sensitive to many factors, including governmental
monetary and tax policies, domestic and international economic
and political considerations and other factors beyond our
control. All of our market risk sensitive assets, liabilities
and related derivative positions are for non-trading purposes
only.
Management recognizes the following primary risks associated
with our business and the industry in which we conduct business:
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate and market (fair value) risk |
|
|
|
Credit spread risk |
|
|
|
Liquidity and funding risk |
|
|
|
Prepayment risk |
|
|
|
Credit risk |
Our primary interest rate exposure relates to the portfolio of
adjustable-rate mortgage loans and mortgage-backed securities we
acquire, as well as our variable-rate borrowings and related
interest rate swaps and caps. Interest rate risk is defined as
the sensitivity of our current and future earnings to interest
rate volatility, variability of spread relationships, the
difference in re-pricing intervals between our assets and
liabilities and the effect that interest rates may have on our
cash flows, especially the speed at which prepayments occur on
our residential mortgage related assets.
Changes in the general level of interest rates can affect our
net interest income, which is the difference between the
interest income earned on interest earning assets and our
interest expense incurred in connection with our interest
bearing debt and liabilities. Changes in interest rates can also
affect, among other things, our ability to originate and acquire
loans and securities, the value of our loans, mortgage pools and
mortgage-backed securities, and our ability to realize gains
from the resale and settlement of such originated loans.
60
In our investment portfolio, our primary market risk is interest
rate risk. We attempt to manage interest rate risk by adjusting
portfolio compositions, liability maturities and utilizing
interest rate derivatives including interest rate swaps and
caps. Our goal is to maximize the earnings potential of the
portfolio while maintaining long term stable portfolio
valuations.
We utilize a model based risk analysis system to assist in
projecting portfolio performances over a scenario of the
interest rates. The model incorporates shifts in interest rates,
changes in prepayments and other factors impacting the
valuations of our financial securities, including
mortgage-backed securities, repurchase agreements, interest rate
swaps and interest rate caps.
Based on the results of this model, as of March 31, 2005,
an instantaneous shift of 100 basis points in interest
rates would result in an approximate decrease in the net
interest spread by 8-10 basis points as compared to our
base line projections over the next year.
The following tables set forth information about financial
instruments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
Notional | |
|
Carrying | |
|
Estimated | |
|
|
Amount | |
|
Amount | |
|
Fair Value | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Investment securities available for sale
|
|
$ |
1,109,603,785 |
|
|
$ |
1,112,989,795 |
|
|
$ |
1,112,989,795 |
|
Mortgage loans held for investment
|
|
|
68,011,188 |
|
|
|
68,462,832 |
|
|
|
68,401,520 |
|
Mortgage loans held in the securitization trust
|
|
|
413,396,100 |
|
|
|
417,383,398 |
|
|
|
415,698,386 |
|
Mortgage loans held for sale
|
|
|
99,350,664 |
|
|
|
99,554,363 |
|
|
|
100,028,276 |
|
Commitments and contingencies:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate lock commitments
|
|
|
245,419,888 |
|
|
|
(838,928 |
) |
|
|
(838,928 |
) |
|
Forward loan sales contracts
|
|
|
114,350,398 |
|
|
|
567,125 |
|
|
|
567,125 |
|
|
Interest rate swaps
|
|
|
735,000,000 |
|
|
|
8,596,927 |
|
|
|
8,596,927 |
|
|
Interest rate caps
|
|
|
684,451,791 |
|
|
|
1,632,751 |
|
|
|
1,632,751 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
Notional | |
|
Carrying | |
|
Estimated | |
|
|
Amount | |
|
Amount | |
|
Fair Value | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Investment securities available for sale
|
|
$ |
1,194,055,340 |
|
|
$ |
1,204,744,714 |
|
|
$ |
1,204,744,714 |
|
Mortgage loans held for investment
|
|
|
188,858,607 |
|
|
|
190,153,103 |
|
|
|
190,608,241 |
|
Mortgage loans held for sale
|
|
|
85,105,027 |
|
|
|
85,384,927 |
|
|
|
86,097,867 |
|
Commitments and contingencies:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate lock commitments
|
|
|
156,110,472 |
|
|
|
37,867 |
|
|
|
37,867 |
|
|
Forward loan sales contracts
|
|
|
97,080,482 |
|
|
|
(164,816 |
) |
|
|
(164,816 |
) |
|
Interest rate swaps
|
|
|
670,000,000 |
|
|
|
3,228,457 |
|
|
|
3,228,457 |
|
|
Interest rate caps
|
|
|
250,000,000 |
|
|
|
411,248 |
|
|
|
411,248 |
|
The impact of changing interest rates may be mitigated by
portfolio prepayment activity that we closely monitor and the
portfolio funding strategies we employ. First, our adjustable
rate borrowings may react to changes in interest rates before
our adjustable rate assets because the weighted average future
repricing dates on the related borrowings may have shorter time
periods than that of the adjustable rate assets. Second,
interest rates on adjustable rate assets may be limited to a
periodic cap or an increase of typically 1% or
2% per adjustment period, while our borrowings do not have
comparable limitations. Third, our adjustable rate assets
typically lag changes in the applicable interest rate indices by
45 days, due to the notice period provided to adjustable
rate borrowers when the interest rates on their loans are
scheduled to change.
In a period of declining interest rates or nominal differences
between long-term and short-term interest rates, the rate of
prepayment on our mortgage assets may increase. Increased
prepayments would cause us to amortize any premiums paid for our
mortgage assets faster, thus resulting in a reduced net yield on
our
61
mortgage assets. Additionally, to the extent proceeds of
prepayments cannot be reinvested at a rate of interest at least
equal to the rate previously earned on such mortgage assets, our
earnings may be adversely affected.
Conversely, if interest rates rise or if the difference between
long-term and short-term interest rates increase, the rate of
prepayment on our mortgage assets may decrease. Decreased
prepayments would cause us to amortize the premiums paid for our
ARM assets over a longer time period, thus resulting in an
increased net yield on our mortgage assets. Therefore, in rising
interest rate environments where prepayments are declining, not
only would the interest rate on the ARM assets portfolio
increase to re-establish a spread over the higher interest
rates, but the yield also would rise due to slower prepayments.
The combined effect could significantly mitigate other negative
effects that rising short-term interest rates might have on
earnings.
Interest rates can also affect our net return on hybrid
adjustable rate (hybrid ARM) securities and loans
net of the cost of financing hybrid ARMs. We continually monitor
and estimate the duration of our hybrid ARMs and have a policy
to hedge the financing of the hybrid ARMs such that the net
duration of the hybrid ARMs, our borrowed funds related to such
assets, and related hedging instruments are less than one year.
During a declining interest rate environment, the prepayment of
hybrid ARMs may accelerate (as borrowers may opt to refinance at
a lower rate) causing the amount of fixed-rate financing to
increase relative to the amount of hybrid ARMs, possibly
resulting in a decline in our net return on hybrid ARMs as
replacement hybrid ARMs may have a lower yield than those being
prepaid. Conversely, during an increasing interest rate
environment, hybrid ARMs may prepay slower than expected,
requiring us to finance a higher amount of hybrid ARMs than
originally forecast and at a time when interest rates may be
higher, resulting in a decline in our net return on hybrid ARMs.
Our exposure to changes in the prepayment speed of hybrid ARMs
is mitigated by regular monitoring of the outstanding balance of
hybrid ARMs and adjusting the amounts anticipated to be
outstanding in future periods and, on a regular basis, making
adjustments to the amount of our fixed-rate borrowing
obligations for future periods.
Interest rate changes can also affect the availability and
pricing of adjustable rate assets, which affects our origination
activity and investment opportunities. During a rising interest
rate environment, there may be less total loan origination
activity, particularly for refinancings. At the same time, a
rising interest rate environment may result in a larger
percentage of adjustable rate products being originated,
mitigating the impact of lower overall loan origination
activity. In addition, our focus on purchase mortgages as
opposed to refinancings also mitigates the volatility of our
origination volume as refinancing volume is typically a function
of lower interest rates, whereas, purchase mortgage volume has
historically remained relatively static during interest rate
cycles. Conversely, during a declining interest rate environment
total loan origination activity may rise with many of the
borrowers desiring fixed-rate mortgage products. Although
adjustable rate product origination as a percentage of total
loan origination may decline during these periods, the increased
loan origination and refinancing volume in the industry may
produce sufficient investment opportunities. Additionally, a
flat yield curve may be an adverse environment for adjustable
rate products because the incentive for a borrower to choose an
adjustable rate product over a longer term fixed-rate mortgage
loan is minimized and, conversely, in a steep yield curve
environment, adjustable rate products may enjoy an above average
advantage over longer term fixed-rate mortgage loans, increasing
our investment opportunities.
As the rate environment changes, the impact on origination
volume and the type of loan product that is favored is
mitigated, in part, by our ability to operate in our two
business segments. In periods where adjustable rate product is
favored, our mortgage portfolio management segment, which
invests in such mortgage loans, will benefit from a larger
selection of loan product for its portfolio and the inherent
lower cost basis and resultant wider net margin. Our mortgage
lending segment, regardless of whether adjustable rate or fixed
rate product is favored, will continue to originate such loans
and will continue to sell to third parties all fixed rate
product; as a result, in periods where fixed rate product is
favored, our origination segment may see increased revenues as
such fixed product is sold to third parties.
Interest rate changes may also impact our net book value as our
securities, certain mortgage loans and related hedge derivatives
are marked-to-market each quarter. Generally, as interest rates
increase, the value of our fixed income investments, such as
mortgage loans and mortgage-backed securities, decreases and as
interest rates decrease, the value of such investments will
increase. We seek to hedge to some degree changes
62
in value attributable to changes in interest rates by entering
into interest rate swaps and other derivative instruments. In
general, we would expect that, over time, decreases in value of
our portfolio attributable to interest rate changes will be
offset to some degree by increases in value of our interest rate
swaps, and vice versa. However, the relationship between spreads
on securities and spreads on swaps may vary from time to time,
resulting in a net aggregate book value increase or decline.
However, unless there is a material impairment in value that
would result in a payment not being received on a security or
loan, changes in the book value of our portfolio will not
directly affect our recurring earnings or our ability to make a
distribution to our stockholders.
In order to minimize the negative impacts of changes in interest
rates on earnings and capital, we closely monitor our asset and
liability mix and utilize interest rate swaps and caps, subject
to the limitations imposed by the REIT qualification tests.
Movements in interest rates can pose a major risk to us in
either a rising or declining interest rate environment. We
depend on substantial borrowings to conduct our business. These
borrowings are all made at variable interest rate terms that
will increase as short term interest rates rise. Additionally,
when interest rates rise, mortgage loans held for sale and any
applications in process with interest rate lock commitments, or
IRLCs, decrease in value. To preserve the value of such loans or
applications in process with IRLCs, we may enter into forward
sale loan contracts, or FSLCs, to be settled at future dates
with fixed prices.
When interest rates decline, loan applicants may withdraw their
open applications on which we have issued an IRLC. In those
instances, we may be required to purchase loans at current
market prices to fulfill existing FSLCs, thereby incurring
losses upon sale. We monitor our mortgage loan pipeline closely
and on occasion may choose to renegotiate locked loan terms with
a borrower to prevent withdrawal of open applications and
mitigate the associated losses.
In the event that we do not deliver the FSLCs or exercise our
option contracts, the instruments can be settled on a net basis.
Net settlement entails paying or receiving cash based upon the
change in market value of the existing instrument. All FSLCs and
option contracts to buy securities are to be contractually
settled within six months of the balance sheet date. FSLCs and
options contracts for individual loans generally must be settled
within 60 days.
Our hedging transactions using derivative instruments also
involve certain additional risks such as counterparty credit
risk, the enforceability of hedging contracts and the risk that
unanticipated and significant changes in interest rates will
cause a significant loss of basis in the contract. The
counterparties to our derivative arrangements are major
financial institutions and securities dealers that are well
capitalized with high credit ratings and with which we may also
have other financial relationships. While we do not anticipate
nonperformance by any counterparty, we are exposed to potential
credit losses in the event the counterparty fails to perform.
Our exposure to credit risk in the event of default by a
counterparty is the difference between the value of the contract
and the current market price. There can be no assurance that we
will be able to adequately protect against the forgoing risks
and will ultimately realize an economic benefit that exceeds the
related expenses incurred in connection with engaging in such
hedging strategies.
While we have not experienced any significant credit losses, in
the event of a significant rising interest rate environment
and/or economic downturn, mortgage and loan defaults may
increase and result in credit losses that would adversely affect
our liquidity and operating results.
The mortgage-backed securities we will own are also subject to
spread risk. The majority of these securities are
adjustable-rate securities that are valued based on a market
credit spread to U.S. Treasury security yields. In other
words, their value is dependent on the yield demanded on such
securities by the market based on their credit relative to
U.S. Treasury securities. Excessive supply of such
securities combined with reduced demand will generally cause the
market to require a higher yield on such securities, resulting
in the use of a higher or wider spread over the benchmark rate
(usually the applicable U.S. Treasury security yield) to
value such securities. Under such conditions, the value of our
securities portfolio would tend to
63
decline. Conversely, if the spread used to value such securities
were to decrease or tighten, the value of our securities
portfolio would tend to increase. Such changes in the market
value of our portfolio may affect our net equity, net income or
cash flow directly through their impact on unrealized gains or
losses on available-for-sale securities, and therefore our
ability to realize gains on such securities, or indirectly
through their impact on our ability to borrow and access capital.
Furthermore, shifts in the U.S. Treasury yield curve, which
represents the markets expectations of future interest
rates, would also affect the yield required on our securities
and therefore their value. These shifts, or a change in spreads,
would have a similar effect on our portfolio, financial position
and results of operations.
For certain of the financial instruments that we own, fair
values will not be readily available since there are no active
trading markets for these instruments as characterized by
current exchanges between willing parties. Accordingly, fair
values can only be derived or estimated for these investments
using various valuation techniques, such as computing the
present value of estimated future cash flows using discount
rates commensurate with the risks involved. However, the
determination of estimated future cash flows is inherently
subjective and imprecise. Minor changes in assumptions or
estimation methodologies can have a material effect on these
derived or estimated fair values. These estimates and
assumptions are indicative of the interest rate environments as
of March 31, 2005 and do not take into consideration the
effects of subsequent interest rate fluctuations.
We note that the values of our investments in mortgage-backed
securities, and in derivative instruments, primarily interest
rate hedges on our debt, will be sensitive to changes in market
interest rates, interest rate spreads, credit spreads and other
market factors. The value of these investments can vary and has
varied materially from period to period. Historically, the
values of our mortgage loan portfolio have tended to vary
inversely with those of its derivative instruments.
The following describes the methods and assumptions we use in
estimating fair values of our financial instruments:
|
|
|
Fair value estimates are made as of a specific point in time
based on estimates using present value or other valuation
techniques. These techniques involve uncertainties and are
significantly affected by the assumptions used and the judgments
made regarding risk characteristics of various financial
instruments, discount rates, estimates of future cash flows,
future expected loss experience and other factors. |
|
|
Changes in assumptions could significantly affect these
estimates and the resulting fair values. Derived fair value
estimates cannot be substantiated by comparison to independent
markets and, in many cases, could not be realized in an
immediate sale of the instrument. Also, because of differences
in methodologies and assumptions used to estimate fair values,
the fair values used by us should not be compared to those of
other companies. |
|
|
The fair values of the Companys residential
mortgage-backed securities are generally based on market prices
provided by five to seven dealers who make markets in these
financial instruments. If the fair value of a security is not
reasonably available from a dealer, management estimates the
fair value based on characteristics of the security that the
Company receives from the issuer and on available market
information. |
|
|
The fair value of loans held for investment are determined by
the loan pricing sheet which is based on internal management
pricing and third party competitors in similar products and
markets. |
|
|
The fair value of commitments to fund with agreed upon rates are
estimated using the fees and rates currently charged to enter
into similar agreements, taking into account the remaining terms
of the agreements and the present creditworthiness of the
counterparties. For fixed rate loan commitments, fair value also
considers the difference between current market interest rates
and the existing committed rates. |
64
|
|
|
The fair value of commitments to deliver mortgages is estimated
using current market prices for dealer or investor commitments
relative to our existing positions. |
The market risk management discussion and the amounts estimated
from the analysis that follows are forward-looking statements
that assume that certain market conditions occur. Actual results
may differ materially from these projected results due to
changes in our ARM portfolio and borrowings mix and due to
developments in the domestic and global financial and real
estate markets. Developments in the financial markets include
the likelihood of changing interest rates and the relationship
of various interest rates and their impact on our ARM portfolio
yield, cost of funds and cash flows. The analytical methods that
we use to assess and mitigate these market risks should not be
considered projections of future events or operating performance.
As a financial institution that has only invested in U.S.-dollar
denominated instruments, primarily residential mortgage
instruments, and has only borrowed money in the domestic market,
we are not subject to foreign currency exchange or commodity
price risk. Rather, our market risk exposure is largely due to
interest rate risk. Interest rate risk impacts our interest
income, interest expense and the market value on a large portion
of our assets and liabilities. The management of interest rate
risk attempts to maximize earnings and to preserve capital by
minimizing the negative impacts of changing market rates, asset
and liability mix, and prepayment activity.
The table below presents the sensitivity of the market value of
our portfolio using a discounted cash flow simulation model.
Application of this method results in an estimation of the
percentage change in the market value of our assets, liabilities
and hedging instruments per 100 basis point
(bp) shift in interest rates expressed in
years a measure commonly referred to as duration.
Positive portfolio duration indicates that the market value of
the total portfolio will decline if interest rates rise and
increase if interest rates decline. The closer duration is to
zero, the less interest rate changes are expected to affect
earnings. Included in the table is a Base Case
duration calculation for an interest rate scenario that assumes
future rates are those implied by the yield curve as of
March 31, 2005. The other two scenarios assume interest
rates are instantaneously 100 and 200 bps higher that those
implied by market rates as of March 31, 2005.
The use of hedging instruments is a critical part of our
interest rate risk management strategies, and the effects of
these hedging instruments on the market value of the portfolio
are reflected in the models output. This analysis also
takes into consideration the value of options embedded in our
mortgage assets including constraints on the repricing of the
interest rate of ARM assets resulting from periodic and lifetime
cap features, as well as prepayment options. Assets and
liabilities that are not interest rate-sensitive such as cash,
payment receivables, prepaid expenses, payables and accrued
expenses are excluded. The duration calculated from this model
is a key measure of the effectiveness of our interest rate risk
management strategies.
Changes in assumptions including, but not limited to,
volatility, mortgage and financing spreads, prepayment behavior,
defaults, as well as the timing and level of interest rate
changes will affect the results of the model. Therefore, actual
results are likely to vary from modeled results.
Net Portfolio Duration
March 31, 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basis Point Increase | |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
Base | |
|
+100 | |
|
+200 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Mortgage Portfolio
|
|
|
1.12 year |
s |
|
|
1.69 year |
s |
|
|
1.94 year |
s |
Borrowings (including hedges)
|
|
|
.59 |
|
|
|
.59 |
|
|
|
.59 |
|
Net Duration
|
|
|
.53 years |
|
|
|
1.10 year |
s |
|
|
1.35 year |
s |
It should be noted that the model is used as a tool to identify
potential risk in a changing interest rate environment but does
not include any changes in portfolio composition, financing
strategies, market spreads or changes in overall market
liquidity.
65
Based on the assumptions used, the model output suggests a very
low degree of portfolio price change given increases in interest
rates, which implies that our cash flow and earning
characteristics should be relatively stable for comparable
changes in interest rates.
Although market value sensitivity analysis is widely accepted in
identifying interest rate risk, it does not take into
consideration changes that may occur such as, but not limited
to, changes in investment and financing strategies, changes in
market spreads, and changes in business volumes. Accordingly, we
make extensive use of an earnings simulation model to further
analyze our level of interest rate risk.
There are a number of key assumptions in our earnings simulation
model. These key assumptions include changes in market
conditions that affect interest rates, the pricing of ARM
products, the availability of ARM products, and the availability
and the cost of financing for ARM products. Other key
assumptions made in using the simulation model include
prepayment speeds and managements investment, financing
and hedging strategies, and the issuance of new equity. We
typically run the simulation model under a variety of
hypothetical business scenarios that may include different
interest rate scenarios, different investment strategies,
different prepayment possibilities and other scenarios that
provide us with a range of possible earnings outcomes in order
to assess potential interest rate risk. The assumptions used
represent our estimate of the likely effect of changes in
interest rates and do not necessarily reflect actual results.
The earnings simulation model takes into account periodic and
lifetime caps embedded in our ARM assets in determining the
earnings at risk.
|
|
|
Liquidity and Funding Risk |
Liquidity is a measure of our ability to meet potential cash
requirements, including ongoing commitments to repay borrowings,
fund and maintain investments, pay dividends to our stockholders
and other general business needs. We recognize the need to have
funds available for our operating businesses and our investment
in mortgage loans until the settlement or sale of mortgages with
us or with other investors. It is our policy to have adequate
liquidity at all times to cover normal cyclical swings in
funding availability and mortgage demand and to allow us to meet
abnormal and unexpected funding requirements. We plan to meet
liquidity through normal operations with the goal of avoiding
unplanned sales of assets or emergency borrowing of funds.
Our mortgage lending operations require significant cash to fund
loan originations. Our warehouse lending arrangements, including
repurchase agreements, support the mortgage lending operation.
Generally, our warehouse mortgage lenders allow us to borrow
between 98% and 100% of the outstanding principal. Funding for
the difference generally 2% of the
principal must come from other cash inflows. Our
operating cash inflows are predominately from cash flow from
mortgage securities, principal and interest on mortgage loans,
third party sales of originated loans that do not fit our
portfolio investment criteria, and fee income from loan
originations. Other than access to our financing facilities,
proceeds from equity offerings have been used to support
operations.
Loans financed with warehouse, aggregation and repurchase credit
facilities are subject to changing market valuations and margin
calls. The market value of our loans is dependent on a variety
of economic conditions, including interest rates (and borrower
demand) and end investor desire and capacity. There is no
certainty that market values will remain constant. To the extent
the value of the loans declines significantly, we would be
required to repay portions of the amounts we have borrowed. The
derivative financial instruments we use also subject us to
margin call risk based on their market values. Under
our interest rate swaps, we pay a fixed rate to the
counterparties while they pay us a floating rate. When floating
rates are low, on a net basis we pay the counterparty and
visa-versa. In a declining interest rate environment, we would
be subject to additional exposure for cash margin calls.
However, the asset side of the balance sheet should increase in
value in a further declining interest rate scenario. Most of our
interest rate swap agreements provide for a bi-lateral posting
of margin, the effect being that on either side of the valuation
for such swaps, the counterparty can call/post margin. Unlike
typical unilateral posting of margin only in the direction of
the swap counterparty, this provides us with additional
flexibility in meeting our liquidity requirements as we can call
margin on our counterparty as swap values increase.
66
Incoming cash on our mortgage loans and securities is a
principal source of cash. The volume of cash depends on, among
other things, interest rates. The volume and quality of such
incoming cash flows can be impacted by severe and immediate
changes in interest rates. If rates increase dramatically, our
short-term funding costs will increase quickly. While many of
our loans are hybrid ARMs, they typically will not reset as
quickly as our funding costs creating a reduction in incoming
cash flow. Our derivative financial instruments are used to
mitigate the effect of interest rate volatility.
We manage liquidity to ensure that we have the continuing
ability to maintain cash flows that are adequate to fund
operations and meet commitments on a timely and cost-effective
basis. Our principal sources of liquidity are the repurchase
agreement market, the issuance of CDOs, whole loan financing
facilities as well as principal and interest payments from ARM
assets. We believe that our liquidity level is in excess of that
necessary to satisfy our operating requirements and we expect to
continue to use diverse funding sources to maintain our
financial flexibility.
When borrowers repay the principal on their mortgage loans
before maturity or faster than their scheduled amortization, the
effect is to shorten the period over which interest is earned,
and therefore, reduce the cash flow and yield on our ARM assets.
Furthermore, prepayment speeds exceeding or lower than our
reasonable estimates for similar assets, impact the
effectiveness of any hedges we have in place to mitigate
financing and/or fair value risk. Generally, when market
interest rates decline, borrowers have a tendency to refinance
their mortgages. The higher the interest rate a borrower
currently has on his or her mortgage the more incentive he or
she has to refinance the mortgage when rates decline.
Additionally, when a borrower has a low loan-to-value ratio, he
or she is more likely to do a cash-out refinance.
Each of these factors increases the chance for higher prepayment
speeds during the term of the loan.
We generally do not originate loans that provide for a
prepayment penalty if the loan is fully or partially paid off
prior to scheduled maturity. We mitigate prepayment risk by
constantly evaluating our ARM portfolio at a range of reasonable
market prepayment speeds observed at the time for assets with a
similar structure, quality and characteristics. Furthermore, we
stress-test the portfolio as to prepayment speeds and interest
rate risk in order to develop an effective hedging strategy.
For the quarter ended March 31, 2005, our mortgage assets
paid down at an approximate average annualized Constant Paydown
Rate (CPR) of 22%, compared to 24% for the quarter
ended December 31, 2004. The constant prepayment rate
averaged approximately 20% during the first six months of
operations ended December 31, 2004. When prepayment
experience increases, we have to amortize our premiums over a
shorter time period, resulting in a reduced yield to maturity on
our ARM assets. Conversely, if actual prepayment experience
decreases, we would amortize the premium over a longer time
period, resulting in a higher yield to maturity. We monitor our
prepayment experience on a monthly basis and adjust the
amortization of the net premium, as appropriate.
Credit risk is the risk that we will not fully collect the
principal we have invested in mortgage loans or securities. As
previously noted, we are predominantly a high-credit quality
loan originator and our underwriting guidelines are intended to
evaluate the credit history of the potential borrower, the
capacity and willingness of the borrower to repay the loan, and
the adequacy of the collateral securing the loan.
We mitigate credit risk by directly underwriting our own loan
originations and re-underwriting any loans originated through
our correspondent networks. With regard to the purchased
mortgage security portfolio, we rely on the guaranties of
FannieMae, Freddie Mac or the AAA/ Aaa rating established by the
rating agencies.
With regard to loan originations, factors such as FICO score,
LTV, debt-to-income ratio, and other borrower and collateral
factors are evaluated. Credit enhancement features, such as
mortgage insurance may also be factored into the credit
decision. In some instances, when the borrower exhibits strong
compensating factors, exceptions to the underwriting guidelines
may be approved.
67
Our loan originations are concentrated in geographic markets
that are generally supply constrained. We believe that these
markets have less exposure to sudden declines in housing values
than those markets which have an oversupply of housing. In
addition, in the supply constrained housing markets we focus on,
housing values tend to be high and, generally, underwriting
standards for higher value homes require lower LTVs and thus
more owner equity further mitigating credit risk. Finally, the
higher housing value/mortgage loan financing markets allow for
more cost efficient origination volume in terms of dollars and
units. For our mortgage securities that are purchased, we rely
on the Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac and AAA-rating of the
securities supplemented with additional due diligence.
68
OUR COMPANY
Overview
We are a fully integrated, self-advised residential mortgage
banking company that originates, acquires and retains, sells and
securitizes mortgage assets. We intend to elect to be taxed as a
real estate investment trust, or REIT, under the Internal
Revenue Code commencing with our taxable year ended
December 31, 2004, upon filing our federal income tax
return for that year. We earn net interest income from
residential mortgage-backed securities and adjustable-rate
mortgage loans originated primarily through our wholly-owned
subsidiary, NYMC. Our residential mortgage investments are
comprised of adjustable rate loans, adjustable rate securities
and, to a lesser extent, floating rate collateralized mortgage
obligations. The adjustable rate loans and securities, which we
sometimes collectively refer to as ARM in this
prospectus, are comprised of traditional ARM securities and
loans, which have interest rates that reset in a year or less
and hybrid ARM securities and loans, which have a
fixed interest rate for an initial period of two to five years
before converting to ARMs whose rate will reset for their
remaining terms to maturity. ARM securities represent interests
in pools of whole ARM loans. The ARM securities are rated by at
least one of two nationally recognized statistical rating
agencies, Standard and Poors, Inc. or Moodys
Investors Service, Inc., collectively referred to in this
prospectus as the rating agencies, or issued and
guaranteed by Freddie Mac or Fannie Mae. The floating
rate collateralized mortgage obligations are mortgage securities
backed by a pool of FannieMae or Freddie Mac fixed rate mortgage
loans which have interest rates that adjust monthly. We also
invest in mortgage-backed securities from time to time on a
leverage basis. Our portfolio of mortgage loans and mortgage
securities was approximately $1.6 billion as of
March 31, 2005.
We originated $1.85 billion for the year ended
December 31, 2005 and $672.5 million for the quarter
ended March 31, 2005. Generally, we intend to continue to
sell the fixed-rate loans, and ARM loans that do not meet our
investment criteria or portfolio requirements, that we originate
to third parties, and to retain in our portfolio and finance a
majority of the ARM mortgage loans that we originate. Our
portfolio loans are held at the REIT level or by NYMF, our
wholly-owned subsidiary. We rely on our own underwriting
criteria with respect to the mortgage loans we intend to retain
in our portfolio and rely on the underwriting criteria of the
institutions to which we sell our loans with respect to the
loans we intend to sell. We believe that proper underwriting for
the loans in our portfolio is critical to managing the credit
risk inherent in our portfolio. We believe that there is
substantial benefit to directly performing our own underwriting
of loans in our portfolio as compared to a purchased securities
portfolio. Our focus on underwriting has resulted in an
extremely stable portfolio where only one loan, as of
March 31, 2005, was more than 30 days delinquent.
We believe that our ability to use primarily mortgage loans that
we originate as the basis for our portfolio will enable us to
build a portfolio that generates a higher return than the
returns realized by mortgage investors that do not have their
own origination capabilities, because mortgage investors that do
not have their own origination capabilities must purchase their
mortgage loans from third parties at costs higher than
NYMCs cost of originating the mortgage loans that we
retain. While we continue to originate and build our portfolio
of ARM loans, we also intend to continue to purchase from third
parties on a leveraged basis residential mortgage-backed
securities issued and guaranteed by Fannie Mae or
Freddie Mac or rated investment grade by a rating agency.
Over time, we expect that these securities will be replaced by
ARM loans that we originate, although, from time to time, we may
continue to purchase securities from third parties. While we
have not established and do not expect to establish a limit on
the amount of leverage we may incur, our leverage ratio, defined
as total financing facilities less subordinated debentures
outstanding divided by total stockholders equity plus
subordinated debentures at March 31, 2005 was
12.1 times.
Historically, we have financed our mortgage originations on a
short-term basis through a variety of warehouse lines of credit
and repurchase facilities. We intend to continue to use
warehouse lines of credit and repurchase facilities to fund
NYMCs originations, and we will finance our portfolio of
mortgage loans with a combination of equity capital, repurchase
facilities and securitizations. From time to time as we
aggregate a large enough portfolio comprised mainly of retained
mortgage loans, we securitize these mortgage loans. We
anticipate that the securitization transactions through which we
finance the adjustable-rate and hybrid mortgage loans that we
retain will be structured as financings for both tax and
financial accounting purposes.
69
Therefore, we do not expect to generate a gain or loss on sales
from these activities, and, following the securitizations, the
loans will remain on our consolidated balance sheet as assets
with the securitization debt listed as a liability. On
February 25, 2005, we completed our first loan
securitization of approximately $419 million of high-credit
quality, first-lien, ARM loans through New York Mortgage
Trust 2005-1.
We intend to elect to be taxed as a REIT under the Internal
Revenue Code. As a REIT, we generally will not be subject to
federal income tax on the REIT taxable income that we currently
distribute to our stockholders, but the taxable income generated
by NYMC, our taxable REIT subsidiary, which will include fee
income on all loans we originate and gains and net interest
income on all loans we sell, will be subject to regular
corporate income tax.
Currently, NYMCs core market is the tri-state area of New
York, New Jersey and Connecticut, one of the most densely
populated regions in the United States, which represented
approximately 54.6% of our loan originations, as measured by
principal balance, for the quarter ended March 31, 2005. To
a lesser extent, NYMC is presently doing business in a number of
other states across the United States, including Massachusetts,
California, Florida and Pennsylvania. NYMC is presently licensed
or authorized to do business in a total of 40 states and
the District of Columbia, and license applications are pending
in several other states.
Our History
We were formed as a Maryland corporation in September 2003. In
January 2004, we capitalized NYMF as our wholly-owned
subsidiary. In June 2004, we sold 15 million shares of our
common stock in an initial public offering at a price to the
public of $9.00 per share, raising net proceeds of
approximately $122 million after deducting the
underwriters discount and other offering expenses. We used
substantially all of the net proceeds from our IPO to purchase,
on a leveraged basis, approximately $1.2 billion of
residential mortgage-backed securities. Concurrent with our IPO,
we acquired 100% of the equity interests of NYMC by issuing to
Messrs. Schnall and Fierro, its owners,
2,750,000 shares of common stock. Subsequent to our IPO and
the contribution of NYMC, we have 18,114,445 shares of
common stock issued and 17,797,375 shares outstanding at
December 31, 2004. Prior to our IPO, we and NYMF did not
have recurring business operations.
Prior to the time we acquired NYMC, NYMCs business
strategy was to sell or broker all of the loans it originated to
third parties and the largest component of NYMCs net
income was generated by the gain on sale of such loans. For
accounting purposes and reporting purposes, our acquisition of
NYMC was accounted for as a reverse merger and the related
transfer of loans originated by NYMC to us was accounted for as
a transfer of assets between entities under common control.
Accordingly, we have recorded assets and liabilities transferred
from NYMC at their carrying amounts in the accounts of NYMC at
the date of transfer. Our consolidated financial statements
include our accounts subsequent to the IPO and also include the
accounts of NYMC and NYMF prior to the IPO. As a result, our
historical financial results reflect the financial operations of
this prior business strategy of selling virtually all of the
loans originated by NYMC to third parties. Furthermore, to the
degree we retain for investment selected ARM loans that we
originate, these loans are recorded at cost and no gain on sale,
as would otherwise be recognized if sold to a third party, is
recorded. Our post-IPO business strategy of investing in ARM
assets and the securitization of loans that we originate will
result in net interest income generated by such a portfolio as
being the largest component of our net income. As a result, our
pre-IPO operations and financial results are not necessarily
comparable with our current and future operations and results.
Our Industry
Generally, the residential mortgage industry is segmented by the
size of the mortgage loans and credit characteristics of the
borrowers. Mortgage loans that conform to the guidelines of
entities such as Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac or Ginnie Mae, for both
size and credit characteristics, are often referred to as
conforming mortgage loans. All other mortgage loans
are often referred to as non-conforming loans either because the
size of the loan exceeds the guideline limit or the credit
profiles of the borrowers do not meet the guideline
70
requirements. Our strategy focuses on adjustable- and fixed-rate
and hybrid first-lien mortgage loans to borrowers with strong
credit profiles, which we refer to as prime mortgage loans. We
believe the adjustable-rate and hybrid segment of the prime
residential mortgage loan industry and our ability to originate
such loans provides us the opportunity to build a portfolio of
our own well-originated and well-serviced prime adjustable-rate
and hybrid loans with the goal of generating higher
risk-adjusted returns on investment than would be available from
a portfolio based either on purchased loans or on fixed-rate or
non-prime loans. We believe that our experience as a mortgage
loan originator with a comprehensive and sophisticated process
for credit evaluation, risk-based pricing and loss mitigation
will, over time, provide us with a significant advantage over
other portfolio investors who do not have comparable origination
capabilities.
We believe fundamental changes are occurring in the
U.S. mortgage industry, resulting in the shifting of
investment capital and mortgage assets out of traditional
lending and savings institutions and into new forms of mortgage
banking and mortgage investment firms, including those that
qualify as REITs under the Internal Revenue Code. We believe
that, while traditional mortgage investment companies, such as
banks, thrifts and insurance companies, generally have greater
diversification in their investments than we have as a REIT,
they provide less attractive investment structures for investing
in mortgage assets because of the costs associated with
regulation, infrastructure and corporate level taxation. As a
REIT, we are generally able to pass through our REIT earnings to
our stockholders without incurring entity-level federal income
tax, thereby allowing us to make relatively larger distributions
than institutions with similar investments because they are
subject to federal income tax on their earnings.
Additionally, with the development of highly competitive
national mortgage markets, which we believe is partly due to
expansion of Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac and Ginnie Mae, local and
regional mortgage originators have lost market share to more
efficient mortgage originators who compete nationally. The
growth of the secondary mortgage market, including new
securitization techniques, has also resulted in financing
structures that can be utilized efficiently to fund leveraged
mortgage portfolios and better manage interest rate risk.
Our Business Strategy
Our goal is to maximize the long-term sustainable difference
between the yield on our investments and the cost of financing
those assets. We intend to execute our strategy by:
|
|
|
|
|
continuing to focus on originating prime residential mortgage
loans through NYMC that we believe can be used to grow our
portfolio or sold at a profit; |
|
|
|
expanding our retail mortgage banking business through hiring
additional loan officers, the opening of new retail branch
offices in new markets and selectively pursuing strategic
acquisitions in the mortgage banking industry; |
|
|
|
leveraging our portfolio to increase its size with the intent to
enhance our returns while at the same time managing the
increased risk of loss associated with this leverage; and |
|
|
|
utilizing hedging strategies that we consider appropriate to
minimize exposure to interest rate changes. |
Our Competitive Advantages
We believe we enjoy several key competitive advantages that will
enable us to implement our business strategy. These competitive
advantages include:
|
|
|
|
|
our ability to use mortgage loans that we originate as the basis
for our portfolio, which we believe will enable us to build a
portfolio that generates a higher return than the returns
realized by other mortgage investors that do not have their own
origination capabilities; |
|
|
|
our extensive network of referral sources that generates
recurring purchase loan originations; |
|
|
|
our ability to offer a broader range of mortgage loan products
than most of our competitors, including fixed-rate,
adjustable-rate and hybrid mortgage loans with varying total
terms, which allows us to meet |
71
|
|
|
|
|
the needs of a wider variety of customers as compared to those
of our competitors that do not offer as many loan products; |
|
|
|
access to real time data and trends in the residential mortgage
business from NYMC, our mortgage loan originator, that we
believe will enable us to better manage our origination strategy
and investment decisions and risks with respect to our
portfolio; and |
|
|
|
a management team that includes experienced mortgage bankers,
professionals with experience investing in and managing
portfolios of residential mortgage loans and residential
mortgage-backed securities and other professionals. |
Operating Policies, Strategies and Business Segments
The Company operates two segments:
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage Portfolio Management long-term
investment in high-quality, adjustable-rate mortgage loans and
residential mortgage-backed securities; and |
|
|
|
Mortgage Lending mortgage loan originations
as conducted by NYMC. |
Our mortgage portfolio management operations primarily invest in
adjustable-rate agency and AAA rated
residential mortgage-backed securities and high-quality
mortgages that are originated by our mortgage operations or that
may be acquired from third parties. Our equity capital and
borrowed funds are used to invest in residential mortgage-backed
securities and loans held for subsequent securitization, thereby
producing net interest income.
The mortgage lending segment originates residential mortgage
loans through our taxable REIT subsidiary, NYMC. Loans are
originated through NYMCs retail and internet branches as
well as from independent mortgage brokers and generate gain on
sale revenue when the loans are sold to third parties or revenue
from brokered loans when the loans are brokered to third parties.
|
|
|
Mortgage Portfolio Management |
Prior to the completion of our IPO on June 29, 2004, our
operations were limited to the mortgage operations described in
the following section, Mortgage Lending. Beginning
in July 2004, we began to implement our business plan of
investing in high-credit quality, adjustable-rate mortgage loan
securities. Our portfolio management strategy is to originate
and acquire ARM assets to hold in our portfolio, fund them using
equity capital and borrowings and to generate net interest
income from the difference, or spread, between the yield on
these assets and our cost of financing.
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from large amounts of equity capital are immediately
invested in acquired ARM securities in order to generate returns
on the equity investment. |
|
|
|
Acquired ARM securities are replaced with high-quality,
higher-yielding, lower cost ARM loans self-originated through
NYMC retail channels and possibly supplemented by NYMCs
correspondent network. |
|
|
|
Our mortgage portfolio management operates with a long-term
investment outlook. |
|
|
|
Short-term financing of ARM loans to be securitized is provided
by secured warehouse and aggregation lines. |
|
|
|
Ultimate financing for ARM loans is provided by issuing
asset-backed bonds for higher liquidity and more cost efficient
financing provided by repurchase financing facilities. |
We believe that there is a cost advantage obtained from
self-originating loans and holding such loans in securitized
form in the REIT:
|
|
|
|
|
through self-origination, we avoid the intermediation costs
associated with purchasing mortgage assets in the capital
markets; and |
72
|
|
|
|
|
the net interest income generated in the REIT generally will not
be subject to tax, whereas, had we sold our loans in the capital
markets through our TRS, we would have been subject to tax on
the gain on sale of loans. |
This strategy and the use of borrowings to produce the
mortgage-backed securities we hold will produce an attractive
return for our stockholders relative to a purchased securities
portfolio. This attractive return is accomplished by a
combination of the recognition of the incremental lower cost to
originate such loans and/or the ability to better afford
appropriate interest rate hedging strategies in order to provide
a similar return to a purchased securities portfolio but with a
lower risk profile.
We seek to have a portfolio consisting of high-credit quality
mortgage-backed securities and loans. We believe that retaining
high-credit quality assets in our portfolio helps us mitigate
risks associated with market disruptions. Our investment
guidelines define the following classifications for securities
we own:
|
|
|
|
|
Category I investments are mortgage-backed securities that
are either rated within one of the two highest rating categories
by at least one of the rating agencies, or have their repayment
guaranteed by Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, or Ginnie Mae. |
|
|
|
Category II investments are mortgage-backed securities with
an investment grade rating of BBB/ Baa or better by at least one
of the rating agencies. |
|
|
|
Category III investments are mortgage-backed securities
that have no rating from, or are rated below investment grade by
at least one of the rating agencies. |
We retain on our balance sheet a majority of the residential
first lien adjustable-rate and hybrid mortgage loans originated
by NYMC that we believe have a low risk of default and resulting
loss and are of the following types:
|
|
|
|
|
1 month adjustable-rate (various total terms); |
|
|
|
6 month adjustable-rate (various total terms); |
|
|
|
1 year adjustable-rate (various total terms); |
|
|
|
2 year fixed-rate, adjustable-rate hybrid (various total
terms); |
|
|
|
3 year fixed-rate, adjustable-rate hybrid (various total
terms); and |
|
|
|
5 year fixed-rate, adjustable-rate hybrid (various total
terms). |
The investment policy adopted by our board of directors
provides, among other things, that:
|
|
|
|
|
no investment shall be made which would cause us to fail to
qualify as a REIT; |
|
|
|
no investment shall be made which would cause us to be regulated
as an investment company; |
|
|
|
at least 70% of our assets will be Category I investments
or loans that back or will back such investments; and |
|
|
|
no more than 7.5% of our assets will be Category III
investments. |
Our board of directors may amend or waive compliance with this
investment policy at any time without the consent of our
stockholders.
We seek to avoid many of the risks typically associated with
companies that purchase mortgage-backed securities in the
capital markets.
|
|
|
|
|
For our self-originated loan portfolio, we perform our own
underwriting rather than rely on the underwriting of others. |
|
|
|
We attempt to closely match the duration of our assets with the
duration of our liabilities and we strive to maintain a net
duration, or duration gap, of one year or less on our ARM
portfolio, related borrowings and hedging instruments. |
73
|
|
|
|
|
We structure our liabilities to mitigate potential negative
effects of changes in the relationship between short- and
longer-term interest rates. |
|
|
|
We may purchase or structure credit enhancements to mitigate
potential losses from borrower defaults. |
|
|
|
Substantially all of our securities are backed by ARM loans.
Because we are focused on holding ARM loans rather than
fixed-rate loans, we believe we will be less adversely affected
by early repayments due to falling interest rates or a reduction
in our net interest income due to rising interest rates. |
Our board of directors has also established an investment and
leverage committee for the purpose of approving certain
investment transactions and the incurrence of indebtedness that
is comprised of our co-chief executive Officers, our President
and Chief Investment Officer, our Chief Financial Officer and
our Chief Operating Officer. The committee has the authority to
approve, without the need of further approval of our board of
directors, the following transactions from time to time, any of
which may be entered into by us or any of our subsidiaries:
|
|
|
|
|
the purchase and sale of Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac or Ginnie Mae
and private label mortgage-backed securities, subject to the
limitations described above; |
|
|
|
securitizations of our mortgage loan portfolio; |
|
|
|
the purchase and sale of Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac or Ginnie Mae
debt; |
|
|
|
the purchase and sale of U.S. Treasury securities; |
|
|
|
the purchase and sale of overnight investments; |
|
|
|
the purchase and sale of money market funds; |
|
|
|
hedging arrangements using: |
|
|
|
|
|
interest rate swaps and Eurodollar contracts; |
|
|
|
caps, floors and collars; |
|
|
|
financial futures; and |
|
|
|
options on any of the above; and |
|
|
|
|
|
the incurrence of indebtedness using: |
|
|
|
|
|
repurchase agreements; |
|
|
|
bank loans, up to an aggregate of $100 million; and |
|
|
|
term repurchase agreements |
Initially, the loans held for investment are funded through
warehouse facilities and repurchase agreements. We ultimately
finance the loans that we retain in our portfolio through
securitization transactions. Upon securitization, we expect that
a vast majority of the resulting mortgage-backed securities will
become eligible for inclusion in Category I.
The only subordinate classes of mortgage-backed securities that
we will hold (Category III investments) are subordinate
classes that result from securitizations of the mortgage loans
in our portfolio. We do not seek to acquire subordinated
mortgage-backed securities as investments but instead acquire
them only in connection with our mortgage loan securitizations
or in order to help us meet our asset tests as a REIT.
We generally maintain an overall debt-to-equity ratio ranging
from 8:1 to 12:1 on the financing of our ARM
investments. Our liabilities are primarily term repurchase
agreements with maturities ranging from one to twelve months. A
significant risk to our operations, relating to our portfolio
management, is the risk that interest rates on our assets will
not adjust at the same times or amounts that rates on our
liabilities adjust. Even though we retain and invest in ARMs,
many of the hybrid ARM loans in our portfolio have fixed rates
of interest for a period of time ranging from two to five years.
Our funding costs are generally not constant or
74
fixed. As a result, we use interest rate swaps to extend the
duration of our liabilities to attempt to match the duration of
our assets and we use term repurchase agreements with laddered
maturities to reduce the risk of a disruption in the repurchase
market. Since we hold primarily ARM securities rated AAA and
agency securities guaranteed by Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac, we
believe we are less susceptible to a disruption in the
repurchase market as these types of securities have typically
been eligible for repurchase market financing even when
repurchase financing was not available for other classes of
mortgage assets or asset backed bonds.
The origination of mortgage loans through our mortgage lending
operations is significant to our financial results in that it:
|
|
|
|
|
originates the high quality mortgage loans that we retain and
ultimately collateralize as mortgage securities that we hold in
our portfolio; |
|
|
|
allows us to be competitive by offering a broad range of
residential mortgage loan products; and |
|
|
|
generates gain on sale income at the TRS with the ability to
sell to third parties any fixed-rate and ARM loans that are not
eligible for retention and investment in our portfolio. |
Furthermore, we believe our ability to originate ARM loans for
securitization benefits us by providing:
|
|
|
|
|
the ability to originate ARM assets at lower cost, so that the
amount of premium (net cost over par) to be amortized will be
reduced in the event of prepayment; |
|
|
|
generally higher yielding investments as our cost basis is
lower; providing the ability to generate a higher return to
shareholders and/or the ability to absorb the cost of additional
interest rate hedges and thus reduce the inherent interest rate
risk in our portfolio; |
|
|
|
greater control over the quality and types of ARM loans in our
portfolio as we directly perform our own underwriting of such
loans and can encourage our loan officers to focus on certain
types of ARM products. |
Our correspondent network provides additional sources of ARM
loans.
Through NYMC, our loan origination business originates primarily
first mortgages on one-to-four family dwellings through the
Companys retail loan production offices and is
supplemented by our wholesale division and internet channel
(MortgageLine.com).
We believe that the substantial growth of NYMCs mortgage
banking business since its inception has resulted from its
commitment to providing exemplary service to its customers and
its concentration on retail, referral-based, mortgage banking to
borrowers with strong credit profiles. Based on our past
experience and our knowledge of the mortgage industry, we
believe that referrals from realtors, attorneys, accountants and
other professionals and business from repeat customers tend to
generate a higher percentage of purchase mortgage loan
applications than refinance applications as compared to the loan
applications generated by advertising and other mass marketing
efforts. For the quarter ended March 31, 2005, our purchase
loan originations represented 56.6% of NYMCs total
residential mortgage loan originations as measured by principal
balance, as compared to an industry-wide percentage of 54.1% for
one-to-four family mortgage loans, according to the
April 14, 2005 report of the Mortgage Bankers Association
of America, or MBAA.
In addition, we believe that the market for mortgage loans for
home purchases is less susceptible than the refinance market to
downturns during periods of increasing interest rates, because
borrowers seeking to purchase a home do not generally base their
decision to purchase on changes in interest rates alone, while
borrowers that refinance their mortgage loans often make their
decision as a direct result of changes in interest rates.
Consequently, while our referral-based marketing strategy may
cause our overall loan origination volume during periods of
declining interest rates to lag our competitors who rely on mass
marketing and advertising and who therefore capture a greater
percentage of loan refinance applications during those periods,
we believe our strategy will enable us to sustain stronger home
purchase loan origination volumes than those same competitors
during periods of flat to rising interest rates. In addition, we
believe that our referral-based
75
business results in relatively higher gross margins and lower
advertising costs and loan generation expenses than most other
mortgage companies whose business is not referral-based.
MORTGAGE LOAN ORIGINATION SUMMARY
For the three months ended March 31, 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
of Loans | |
|
Dollar Value | |
|
% of Total | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Payment Stream
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed Rate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FHA/ VA
|
|
|
462 |
|
|
$ |
59,947,149 |
|
|
|
8.91% |
|
|
Conventional Conforming
|
|
|
1,178 |
|
|
|
192,998,826 |
|
|
|
28.70% |
|
|
Conventional Jumbo
|
|
|
96 |
|
|
|
54,845,900 |
|
|
|
8.16% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Fixed Rate
|
|
|
1,736 |
|
|
$ |
307,791,875 |
|
|
|
45.77% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ARMs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FHA/VA
|
|
|
59 |
|
|
$ |
9,445,507 |
|
|
|
1.40% |
|
|
Conventional
|
|
|
1,313 |
|
|
|
355,302,234 |
|
|
|
52.83% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total ARMs
|
|
|
1,372 |
|
|
|
364,747,741 |
|
|
|
54.23% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Annual Total
|
|
|
3,108 |
|
|
$ |
672,539,616 |
|
|
|
100.00% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loan Purpose
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Conventional
|
|
|
2,587 |
|
|
$ |
603,146,960 |
|
|
|
89.68% |
|
|
FHA/VA
|
|
|
521 |
|
|
|
69,392,656 |
|
|
|
10.32% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
3,108 |
|
|
$ |
672,539,616 |
|
|
|
100.00% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Documentation Type
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Full Doc
|
|
|
2,021 |
|
|
$ |
420,778,645 |
|
|
|
62.57% |
|
|
Reduced Doc
|
|
|
207 |
|
|
|
67,974,238 |
|
|
|
10.10% |
|
|
Stated/Stated
|
|
|
156 |
|
|
|
39,464,030 |
|
|
|
5.87% |
|
|
No Doc
|
|
|
164 |
|
|
|
32,958,688 |
|
|
|
4.90% |
|
|
No Ratio
|
|
|
88 |
|
|
|
16,070,329 |
|
|
|
2.39% |
|
|
Other
|
|
|
472 |
|
|
|
95,293,686 |
|
|
|
14.17% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
3,108 |
|
|
$ |
672,539,616 |
|
|
|
100.00% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MORTGAGE LOAN ORIGINATION SUMMARY
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
of Loans | |
|
Dollar Value | |
|
% of Total | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Payment Stream
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed Rate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FHA/VA
|
|
|
1,830 |
|
|
$ |
226,932,582 |
|
|
|
12.30 |
% |
|
Conventional Conforming
|
|
|
2,628 |
|
|
|
459,081,075 |
|
|
|
24.88 |
% |
|
Conventional Jumbo
|
|
|
345 |
|
|
|
192,735,635 |
|
|
|
10.44 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Fixed Rate
|
|
|
4,803 |
|
|
$ |
878,749,292 |
|
|
|
47.62 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
76
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
of Loans | |
|
Dollar Value | |
|
% of Total | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
ARMs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FHA/VA
|
|
|
231 |
|
|
$ |
30,377,303 |
|
|
|
1.65 |
% |
|
Conventional
|
|
|
3,019 |
|
|
|
936,378,188 |
|
|
|
50.73 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total ARMs
|
|
|
3,250 |
|
|
|
966,755,491 |
|
|
|
52.38 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Annual Total
|
|
|
8,053 |
|
|
$ |
1,845,504,783 |
|
|
|
100.00 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loan Purpose
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Conventional
|
|
|
5,992 |
|
|
$ |
1,588,194,898 |
|
|
|
86.06 |
% |
|
FHA/VA
|
|
|
2,061 |
|
|
|
257,309,885 |
|
|
|
13.94 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
8,053 |
|
|
$ |
1,845,504,783 |
|
|
|
100.00 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Documentation Type
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Full Doc
|
|
|
5,438 |
|
|
$ |
1,257,080,181 |
|
|
|
68.12 |
% |
|
Reduced Doc
|
|
|
621 |
|
|
|
170,501,077 |
|
|
|
9.24 |
% |
|
Stated/ Stated
|
|
|
428 |
|
|
|
117,244,311 |
|
|
|
6.35 |
% |
|
No Doc
|
|
|
449 |
|
|
|
91,193,970 |
|
|
|
4.94 |
% |
|
No Ratio
|
|
|
287 |
|
|
|
69,858,488 |
|
|
|
3.79 |
% |
|
Other
|
|
|
830 |
|
|
|
139,626,756 |
|
|
|
7.56 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
8,053 |
|
|
$ |
1,845,504,783 |
|
|
|
100.00 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our loan origination strategy is predominantly retail,
referral-based, mortgage banking. Our loan officers rely
primarily on the various relationships they have established
with their clientele, realtors, attorneys and others who
routinely interact with those who may need mortgage financing.
Retail loan origination allows us to provide a variety of
attractive and innovative mortgage products at competitive
rates. Unlike many banks and financial institutions which focus
solely on loan products to retain in their portfolios, we offer
a wide range of products products that we can retain
in portfolio and products that we will sell to third parties if
such loans do not meet our investment parameters.
Because we are predominantly referral-based, our cost of
sourcing potential retail clients is less than an organization
that relies heavily on concentrated broadcast, print or internet
media advertising. In order to remain compliant with the Real
Estate Settlement Procedures Act (RESPA), we do not
pay referral fees or enter into above market co-branding,
co-marketing or shared facilities relationships. By eliminating
intermediaries between the borrower and us, we can both
originate high-credit quality mortgage loans for retention in
our portfolio at attractive yields or offer loans that may be
sold to third parties, while at the same time offering our
customers a variety of mortgage products at competitive rates
and fees.
We originate mortgage loans through our wholly-owned TRS, NYMC.
As of March 31, 2005, NYMC was authorized to originate
loans in 40 states and the District of Columbia.
|
|
|
Wholesale Loan Origination |
Our wholesale lending strategy has historically been a small
component of our loan origination operations. We have a network
of non-affiliated wholesale loan brokers and mortgage lenders
who submit loans to us. We maintain relationships with these
wholesale brokers and, as with retail loan originations, will
underwrite, process, and fund wholesale loans through our
centralized facilities and processing systems. In order to
further diversify our origination network, in March 2005,
we began to expand our wholesale loan origination capacity.
77
Through our correspondent lending channels, we may acquire
mortgage loans from approved correspondent lenders. We review
our correspondents for the soundness of their in-house mortgage
lending procedures and their ability to fulfill their
representations and warranties to us. Generally, loans acquired
from correspondents are originated to our approved
specifications including our internally developed loan products,
credit and property guidelines, and underwriting criteria. In
addition, correspondents may sell their own loan products to us
that are originated according to the correspondents
product specifications and underwriting guidelines that we have
approved and accepted.
To verify product quality and compliance with our underwriting
and investment guidelines, we perform a full review of all of
the loans generated by the correspondent prior to the purchase
thereof. A full underwriting review of each loan file, including
all credit and appraisal information, is performed as well as
documentation sufficiency and compliance. Similar to loans
originated through our retail and wholesale channels, these
loans are also subjected to our quality control reviews.
Historically, NYMCs underwriting philosophy has been to
underwrite loans according to the guidelines established by the
available purchasers of its loans. However, now that our
strategy includes retaining select ARM loans for our investment
portfolio, we believe that proper underwriting for such loans is
critical to managing the credit risk inherent in a loan
portfolio. While difficult to quantify, we believe that there is
substantial qualitative benefit to directly performing our own
underwriting of loans in portfolio as compared to a purchased
securities portfolio. Our focus on underwriting has resulted in
an extremely stable portfolio where only one loan, as of
March 31, 2005, was more than 30 days delinquent.
Typically, mortgage underwriting guidelines provide a framework
for determining whether a proposed mortgage loan to a potential
borrower will be approved. The key points in this framework are
the borrowers credit scores and other indicia of the
borrowers ability and willingness to repay the loan, such
as the borrowers employment and income, the amount of the
borrowers equity in and the value of the borrowers
property securing the loan, the borrowers debt to income
and other debt ratios, the loan to value (LTV) of
the loan, the amount of funds available to the borrower for
closing and the borrowers post-closing liquidity.
We continue to follow the underwriting guidelines established by
available purchasers with respect to the loans we intend to
sell. Furthermore, for mortgage loans we intend to retain, we
follow a specific underwriting methodology based on the
following philosophy first evaluate the
borrowers ability and willingness to repay the loan, and
then evaluate the value of the property securing the loan. We
seek only to retain mortgage loans that we believe have low risk
of default and resultant loss. As underwriting basically seeks
to predict future borrower payment patterns and ability based on
the borrowers history and current financial information
and the lenders ability to be made whole in the future
through foreclosure in the event a default does occur, no
assurance can be made that every loan originated or purchased
will perform as anticipated.
The key aspects of our underwriting guidelines are as follows:
Borrower In evaluating the borrowers
ability and willingness to repay a loan, we review and analyze
the following aspects of the borrower: credit score, income and
its source, employment history, debt levels in revolving,
installment and other mortgage loans, credit history and use of
credit in the past, and finally the ability and/or willingness
to provide verification for the above. Credit scores, credit
history, use of credit in the past and information as to debt
levels can be typically obtained from a third party credit
report through a credit repository. Those sources are used in
all cases, as available. In certain cases, borrowers have little
or no credit history that can be tracked by one of the primary
credit repositories. In these cases, the reason for the lack of
history is considered and taken into account. In our experience,
more than 95% of prospective borrowers have accessible credit
histories.
Property In evaluating a potential property
to be used as collateral for a mortgage loan, we consider all of
the following aspects of the property: the loan balance versus
the property value, or LTV, the property type, how the property
will be occupied (a primary residence, second home or investment
property), if the
78
propertys apparent value is supported by recent sales of
similar properties in the same or a nearby area, any unique
characteristics of the property and our confidence in the above
data and their sources.
Other Considerations Other considerations
that impact our decision regarding a borrowers loan
application include the borrowers purpose in requesting
the loan (purchase of a home as opposed to cashing equity out of
the home through a refinancing for example), the loan type
(adjustable-rate, including adjustment periods and loan life
rate caps, or fixed-rate), and any items unique to a loan that
we believe could affect credit performance.
In addition, we work with nationally recognized providers of
appraisal, credit, and title insurance. We oversee the
activities of these service providers through on-site visits,
report monitoring, customer service surveys, post-closing
quality control, and periodic direct participation and
conversations with our customers. A significant amount of our
settlement services are performed by in-house professionals. We
have an extensive quality control review process that is
contracted with a third party in order to verify that selected
loans were properly underwritten, executed and documented. All
loans retained in portfolio and a selection of other loans sold
to third parties also are quality control reviewed internally as
well.
|
|
|
Our Loan Origination Financing Strategy |
We finance our loan originations utilizing warehouse and
repurchase agreements as well as other similar financing
arrangements. The agreements are each renewable annually, but
are not committed, meaning that the counterparties to the
agreements may withdraw access to the credit facilities at any
time.
Warehouse Facilities Non-depository mortgage
lenders, such as NYMC, typically rely on credit facilities for
capital needed to fund new mortgage loans. These facilities are
typically lines of credit from other financial institutions that
the mortgage banker can draw from in order to fund new mortgage
loans. These facilities are referred to as warehouse lines or
warehouse facilities.
Warehouse lines are typically collateralized loans made to
mortgage bankers that in turn pledge the resulting loans to the
warehouse lender. Third-party mortgage custodians, usually large
banks, typically hold the mortgage loans, including the notes,
mortgages and other important loan documentation, for the
benefit of the mortgage lender who is deemed to own the loan
and, if there is a default under the warehouse line, for the
benefit of the warehouse lender.
We currently have a $150 million syndicated line of credit
with HSBC Bank USA and a $250 million warehouse facility
with Greenwich Capital Financial Products, Inc.
Master Repurchase Agreement Mortgage bankers
use repurchase agreements to finance the mortgage loans they
originate. Under those agreements, the mortgage banker sells a
mortgage loan to a counterparty and agrees to repurchase the
loan from the counterparty at a price equal to the original sale
price plus an interest factor.
We currently have a master repurchase agreement, also referred
to as a repurchase agreement, with Credit Suisse First Boston
Mortgage Capital, LLC, pursuant to which we may enter into up to
$200 million in aggregate loan repurchase arrangements. We
currently utilize this master repurchase agreement essentially
like a warehouse line to finance mortgage loans originations.
Loan servicing is the administration function of a mortgage loan
whereby an entity collects monthly payments from a mortgage
borrower and disburses those funds to the appropriate parties.
The servicer has to account for all payments, maintain balances
in certain accounts for each loan, maintain escrow accounts for
real estate taxes and insurance, remit the correct amount of
principal and interest monthly to the holder of the loan and
handle foreclosures as required.
Loans that we originate that are retained by us for our
portfolio have their servicing handled by Cenlar Federal Savings
Bank, or Cenlar, a wholesale bank specializing in mortgage
sub-servicing nationwide. Under this arrangement, Cenlar acts as
an intermediary between us and the borrower. It collects
payments from
79
borrowers, handles accounting and remittance of the payments,
handles escrow accounts and does certain tax reporting. As our
retained loans are securitized, Cenlar continues to service
those loans and reports to the securities trustee or master
servicer, as appropriate.
For a loan originated and sold to third parties, the servicing
rights are sold upon the sale of the loan. We may choose to own,
for periods usually no more than 90 days, certain loans
designated as held for sale to third parties in order to
increase earnings. In these cases, we believe there is a large
enough spread between the mortgage loan interest rate and the
interest rate paid on the applicable warehouse line to make any
additional risk in carrying those loans on our balance sheet
worthwhile. In these cases, and during the interim period
between the time we fund (and subsequently own) a loan and sell
the loan to a third party, we service loans through Cenlar as
well.
Loan servicing provided by Cenlar is provided on a private label
basis, meaning that Cenlar employees will identify themselves as
being our representatives and correspondence regarding loans is
on our letterhead. The benefit to us of this arrangement is that
we pay for loan services as we use them, without a significant
investment in personnel, systems and equipment. In addition,
since Cenlar sub-services on our behalf and reports directly to
us, we are quickly made aware of any customer wishing for an
early payoff of their loan through refinancing or sale of their
home. As a result, we can quickly respond to customer needs and
make immediate efforts reestablishing customer contact in order
to capture the potential payoff of a customers loan with
another loan product (potential refinancing, modification or new
purchase mortgage) that suits their needs.
Description of Businesses
Our mortgage lending operations are significant to our financial
results as they produce the loans that ultimately will
collateralize the mortgage securities that we will hold in our
portfolio. We primarily originate prime, first lien residential
mortgage loans and, to a lesser extent second mortgage loans,
home equity lines of credit, and bridge loans. We originate all
types of mortgage loan products including adjustable-rate
mortgages, or ARM loans, which may have an initial
fixed rate period, and fixed-rate mortgages. Since the
completion of our IPO, we have begun to retain and aggregate our
self-originated, high-quality, shorter-term ARM loans in order
to pool them into mortgage securities. The fixed rate loans we
originate and any ARM loans not meeting our investment criteria
continue to be sold to third parties. For the three months ended
March 31, 2005 and 2004, we originated $426.8 million
and $199.4 million in mortgage loans for sale to third
parties, respectively. We recognized gains on sales of mortgage
loans totaling $4.3 million and $3.5 million for the
three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively.
For the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003, we
originated $1.4 billion and $1.2 billion in mortgage
loans for sale to third parties, respectively. We recognized
gains on sales of mortgage loans totaling $20.8 million and
$23.0 million for the years ended December 31, 2004
and 2003, respectively.
We also broker loans to third party mortgage lenders for which
we receive a broker fee. For the three months ended
March 31, 2005 and 2004, we originated $109.4 million
and $84.1 million in brokered loans, respectively. We
recognized net brokering income totaling approximately $481,000
and $899,000 during the three months ended March 31, 2005
and 2004, respectively. For the years ended December 31,
2004 and 2003, we originated $410.1 million and
$365.5 million in brokered loans, respectively. We
recognized net brokering income totaling $1.6 million and
$2.9 million during the years ended December 31, 2004
and 2003, respectively.
Our wholly-owned subsidiary, NYMC, originates all of the
mortgage loans we retain, sell or broker. On mortgages to be
sold, we underwrite, process and fund the mortgages originated
by NYMC.
A significant risk to our mortgage lending operations is
liquidity risk the risk that we will not have
financing facilities and cash available to fund and hold loans
prior to their sale or securitization. We maintain lending
facilities with large banking and investment institutions to
reduce this risk. On a short-term basis, we finance mortgage
loans using warehouse lines of credit and repurchase agreements.
Details regarding available
80
financing arrangements and amounts outstanding under those
arrangements are included in Liquidity and Capital
Resources below.
|
|
|
Mortgage Portfolio Management |
Prior to the completion of our IPO on June 29, 2004, our
operations were limited to the mortgage operations described in
the preceding section. Beginning in July 2004, we began to
implement our business plan of investing in high-credit quality,
adjustable-rate mortgage-related securities and residential
loans. Our mortgage portfolio, consisting primarily of
residential mortgage-backed securities and mortgages loans held
for investment generates a substantial portion of our earnings.
In managing our investment in a mortgage portfolio, we:
|
|
|
|
|
invest in assets generated primarily from our self-origination
of high-quality, single-family, residential mortgage loans; |
|
|
|
invest in mortgage-backed securities originated by others,
including ARM securities and CMO floaters; |
|
|
|
operate as a long-term portfolio investor; |
|
|
|
finance our portfolio by entering into repurchase agreements and
as we aggregate mortgage loans for investment, entering into
securitization transactions from time to time; and |
|
|
|
generate earnings from the return on our mortgage securities and
spread income from the mortgage loan portfolio. |
A significant risk to our operations, relating to our portfolio
management, is the risk that interest rates on our assets will
not adjust at the same times or amounts that rates on our
liabilities adjust. Even though we retain and invest in ARMs,
many of the hybrid ARM loans in our portfolio have fixed rates
of interest for a period of time ranging from two to five years.
Our funding costs are generally not constant or fixed. As a
result, we use derivative instruments (interest rate swaps and
interest rate caps) to mitigate the risk of our cost of funding
increasing or decreasing at a faster rate than the interest on
the loans (both those on the balance sheet and those that serve
as collateral for mortgage securities).
As of March 31, 2005 our mortgage securities portfolio
consisted of 100% AAA rated or FannieMae or Freddie
Mac-guaranteed (FNMA/FHLMC) mortgage securities.
This allows the company to obtain excellent financing rates as
well as enhanced liquidity. The loans held for securitization
consisted of high-credit quality prime adjustable rate mortgages
with initial reset periods of no greater than 5 years. The
loan portfolio has had no credit losses to date. Our portfolio
strategy for ARM loan originations is to acquire only
high-credit quality ARM loans for our securitization process
thereby limiting any future potential losses.
|
|
|
Investment Securities-Available For Sale Characteristics |
The following tables present various characteristics of our
investment securities and mortgage loan portfolio as of
March 31, 2005.
Characteristics of Our Investment Securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of | |
|
|
Carrying Value | |
|
Sponsor or Rating | |
|
Portfolio | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Credit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Agency REMIC CMO Floating Rate
|
|
$ |
155,476,448 |
|
|
|
FNMA/FHLMC |
|
|
|
14 |
% |
|
FHLMC Agency ARMs
|
|
|
132,617,778 |
|
|
|
FHLMC |
|
|
|
12 |
% |
|
FNMA Agency ARMs
|
|
|
416,326,012 |
|
|
|
FNMA |
|
|
|
37 |
% |
|
Private Label ARMs
|
|
|
408,569,557 |
|
|
|
AAA |
|
|
|
37 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
1,112,989,795 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
81
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted | |
|
|
|
|
% of | |
|
Average | |
|
|
Carrying Value | |
|
Portfolio | |
|
Coupon | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Interest Rate Repricing
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<6 Months
|
|
$ |
202,374,641 |
|
|
|
18 |
% |
|
|
3.93 |
|
|
<36 Months
|
|
|
634,811,548 |
|
|
|
57 |
% |
|
|
4.32 |
|
|
<60 Months
|
|
|
275,803,606 |
|
|
|
25 |
% |
|
|
4.73 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
1,112,989,795 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
4.35 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Characteristics of Our Mortgage Loans Held for Investment and
Collateralizing Debt Obligations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average | |
|
High | |
|
Low | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
General Loan Characteristics:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Original Loan Balance
|
|
$ |
499,589 |
|
|
$ |
3,000,000 |
|
|
$ |
25,000 |
|
|
Coupon Rate
|
|
|
4.75 |
% |
|
|
7.75 |
% |
|
|
2.50 |
% |
|
Gross Margin
|
|
|
2.38 |
% |
|
|
4.38 |
% |
|
|
1.13 |
% |
|
Lifetime Cap(1)
|
|
|
10.67 |
% |
|
|
12.75 |
% |
|
|
9.00 |
% |
|
Original Term (Months)
|
|
|
360 |
|
|
|
360 |
|
|
|
359 |
|
|
Remaining Term (Months)
|
|
|
349 |
|
|
|
360 |
|
|
|
328 |
|
|
|
(1) |
The lifetime cap is the maximum interest rate an adjustable-rate
mortgage is limited to during its entire term. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage | |
|
|
| |
Arm Loan Type
|
|
|
|
|
|
Traditional ARMs(1)
|
|
|
7.2 |
% |
|
2/1 Hybrid ARMs
|
|
|
3.4 |
% |
|
3/1 Hybrid ARMs
|
|
|
61.3 |
% |
|
5/1 Hybrid ARMs
|
|
|
28.1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
Percent of ARM loans that are Interest Only
|
|
|
66.4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
Includes one-year ARM loans and six and one month LIBOR ARM loans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage | |
|
|
| |
Traditional ARMs Periodic Caps
|
|
|
|
|
|
None
|
|
|
68.8 |
% |
|
1%
|
|
|
28.9 |
% |
|
Over 1%
|
|
|
2.3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage | |
|
|
| |
Hybrid ARMs Initial Cap
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.00% or less
|
|
|
60.2 |
% |
|
3.01%-4.00%
|
|
|
1.7 |
% |
|
4.01%-5.00%
|
|
|
8.8 |
% |
|
5.01%-6.00%
|
|
|
29.3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
82
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage | |
|
|
| |
FICO Scores
|
|
|
|
|
|
650 or less
|
|
|
5.2 |
% |
|
651 to 700
|
|
|
20.0 |
% |
|
701 to 750
|
|
|
35.0 |
% |
|
751 to 800
|
|
|
37.4 |
% |
|
801 and over
|
|
|
2.4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average FICO Score
|
|
|
729 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage | |
|
|
| |
Loan to Value (LTV)
|
|
|
|
|
|
50% or less
|
|
|
8.8 |
% |
|
50.01%-60.00%
|
|
|
10.2 |
% |
|
60.01%-70.00%
|
|
|
22.1 |
% |
|
70.01%-80.00%
|
|
|
58.9 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average LTV
|
|
|
68.9 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage | |
|
|
| |
Property Type
|
|
|
|
|
|
Single Family
|
|
|
58.2 |
% |
|
Condominium
|
|
|
17.2 |
% |
|
Cooperative
|
|
|
6.9 |
% |
|
Planned Unit Development
|
|
|
14.0 |
% |
|
Two to Four Family
|
|
|
3.7 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage | |
|
|
| |
Occupancy Status
|
|
|
|
|
|
Primary
|
|
|
89.7 |
% |
|
Secondary
|
|
|
7.3 |
% |
|
Investor
|
|
|
3.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage | |
|
|
| |
Documentation Type
|
|
|
|
|
|
Full
|
|
|
56.7 |
% |
|
Reduced
|
|
|
20.5 |
% |
|
Stated
|
|
|
20.0 |
% |
|
No Documentation
|
|
|
1.8 |
% |
|
No Ratio
|
|
|
1.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
83
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage | |
|
|
| |
Loan Purpose
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase
|
|
|
59.9 |
% |
|
Cash out refinance
|
|
|
21.3 |
% |
|
Rate & term refinance
|
|
|
18.8 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage | |
|
|
| |
Geographic Distribution: 5% or more in any one
state
|
|
|
|
|
|
CA
|
|
|
30.5 |
% |
|
NY
|
|
|
24.2 |
% |
|
MA
|
|
|
9.5 |
% |
|
NJ
|
|
|
5.3 |
% |
|
Other (less than 5% individually)
|
|
|
30.5 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
The following table presents the components of our net interest
income from our investment portfolio of mortgage securities and
loans for the three months ended March 31, 2005:
Net Interest Income Components
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount | |
|
Average Balance | |
|
Effective Rate | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Dollars in millions) | |
Interest Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment securities and loans
|
|
$ |
13,852,396 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage loans held in the securitization trust
|
|
|
1,855,925 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of premium
|
|
|
(1,184,668 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest income
|
|
$ |
14,523,653 |
|
|
$ |
1,447.9 |
|
|
|
4.01 |
% |
Interest Expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repurchase agreements
|
|
$ |
7,893,877 |
|
|
$ |
1,217.3 |
|
|
|
2.59 |
% |
|
Warehouse borrowings
|
|
|
1,144,168 |
|
|
|
146.3 |
|
|
|
3.13 |
% |
|
Interest rate swaps and caps
|
|
|
726,127 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.21 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest expense
|
|
$ |
9,764,172 |
|
|
$ |
1,363.6 |
|
|
|
2.86 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Interest Income
|
|
$ |
4,759,481 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.15 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our Loan Underwriting Guidelines and Practices
Historically, NYMCs underwriting philosophy has been to
underwrite loans according to the guidelines established by the
available purchasers of its loans. However, now that the Company
is retaining select ARM loans for its investment portfolio, we
believe that proper underwriting for such loans is critical to
managing the credit risk inherent in a loan portfolio. While
difficult to quantify, we believe that there is substantial
qualitative benefit to directly performing our own underwriting
of loans in portfolio as compared to a purchased securities
portfolio.
Typically, mortgage underwriting guidelines provide a framework
for determining whether a proposed mortgage loan to a potential
borrower will be approved. The key points in this framework are
the borrowers credit scores and other indicia of the
borrowers ability and willingness to repay the loan, such
as the borrowers employment and income, the amount of the
borrowers equity in and the value of the borrowers
84
property securing the loan, the borrowers debt to income
and other debt ratios, the loan to value (LTV) of
the loan, the amount of funds available to the borrower for
closing and the borrowers post-closing liquidity.
We continue to follow the underwriting guidelines established by
available purchasers with respect to the loans we intend to
sell. Furthermore, for mortgage loans we intend to retain, we
follow a specific underwriting methodology based on the
following philosophy first evaluate the
borrowers ability and willingness to repay the loan, and
then evaluate the value of the property securing the loan. We
seek only to retain mortgage loans that we believe have low risk
of default and resultant loss. As underwriting basically seeks
to predict future borrower payment patterns and ability based on
the borrowers history and current financial information
and the lenders ability to be made whole in the future
through foreclosure in the event a default does occur, no
assurance can be made that every loan originated or purchased
will perform as anticipated.
The key aspects of our underwriting guidelines are as follows:
|
|
|
Borrower In evaluating the borrowers
ability and willingness to repay a loan, we review and analyze
the following aspects of the borrower: credit score, income and
its source, employment history, debt levels in revolving,
installment and other mortgage loans, credit history and use of
credit in the past, and finally the ability and/or willingness
to provide verification for the above. Credit scores, credit
history, use of credit in the past and information as to debt
levels can be typically obtained from a third party credit
report through a credit repository. Those sources are used in
all cases, as available. In certain cases, borrowers have little
or no credit history that can be tracked by one of the primary
credit repositories. In these cases, the reason for the lack of
history is considered and taken into account. In our experience,
more than 95% of prospective borrowers have accessible credit
histories. |
|
|
Property In evaluating a potential property
to be used as collateral for a mortgage loan, we consider all of
the following aspects of the property: the loan balance versus
the property value, or LTV, the property type, how the property
will be occupied (a primary residence, second home or investment
property), if the propertys apparent value is supported by
recent sales of similar properties in the same or a nearby area,
any unique characteristics of the property and our confidence in
the above data and their sources. |
|
|
Other Considerations Other considerations
that impact our decision regarding a borrowers loan
application include the borrowers purpose in requesting
the loan (purchase of a home as opposed to cashing equity out of
the home through a refinancing for example), the loan type
(adjustable-rate, including adjustment periods and loan life
rate caps, or fixed-rate), and any items unique to a loan that
we believe could affect credit performance. |
In addition, we work with nationally recognized providers of
appraisal, credit, and title insurance. We oversee the
activities of these service providers through on-site visits,
report monitoring, customer service surveys, post-closing
quality control, and periodic direct participation and
conversations with our customers. A significant amount of our
settlement services are performed by in-house professionals. We
have an extensive quality control review process that is
contracted with a third party in order to verify that selected
loans were properly underwritten, executed and documented. All
loans retained in portfolio and a selection of other loans sold
to third parties also are quality control reviewed internally as
well.
Policies with Respect to Certain Activities
If our board of directors determines that we require additional
funding, we may raise such funds through additional equity
offerings, debt financings, retention of cash flow, subject to
provisions in the Internal Revenue Code concerning taxability of
undistributed REIT taxable income, or a combination of these
methods.
In the event that our board of directors determines to raise
additional equity capital, it has the authority, without
stockholder approval, to issue additional authorized common and
preferred stock in any manner and on such terms and for such
consideration our board of directors deems appropriate,
including in exchange for property or other non-cash
consideration.
85
Debt financings may be in the form of traditional bank
borrowings, publicly or privately placed debt instruments,
purchase money obligations to the sellers of assets to us,
long-term bonds or other publicly or privately placed debt
instruments, financing from banks, institutional investors or
other lenders, or securitizations, including collateralized debt
securities, any of which indebtedness may be unsecured or may be
secured by mortgage loans or other interests in our assets. Such
indebtedness may have recourse to all or any part of our assets
or may be limited to a particular asset to which the
indebtedness relates.
We have authority to offer our common stock or other equity or
debt securities in exchange for property or other non-cash
consideration and to repurchase or otherwise reacquire our
shares of common stock or any other securities and may engage in
such activities in the future. Similarly, we may offer
additional interests that are exchangeable into common stock or,
at our option, cash, in exchange for property or other non-cash
consideration. We also may make loans to our subsidiaries.
Subject to our ownership limitations and the gross income and
asset tests necessary for REIT qualification, we may invest in
other entities engaged in mortgage-related activities or in the
securities of other issuers, including for the purpose of
exercising control over such entities. We also may engage in the
purchase and sale of investments. We do not intend to underwrite
the securities of other issuers.
Our board of directors may change any of these policies without
a vote of our stockholders.
Competition
We face intense competition from finance and mortgage banking
companies, other mortgage REITs, internet-based lending
companies where entry barriers are relatively low, and, to a
growing extent, from traditional bank and thrift lenders that
have increased their participation in the mortgage industry. As
we seek to expand our loan origination business further and
expand our business strategy to continue to build a portfolio of
mortgage loans and mortgage-backed securities, we face a
significant number of additional competitors, many of whom are
well established in the markets we seek to penetrate. Some of
our competitors are much larger than we are, have better name
recognition than we do and have far greater financial and other
resources than we do.
We anticipate that the majority of our competition will be in
the mortgage lending industry. In addition to mortgage banking
companies, internet-based lending companies, traditional banks
and thrift lenders, the government sponsored entities Fannie Mae
and Freddie Mac are also expanding their participation in the
mortgage lending industry. While the government sponsored
entities presently do not have the legal authority to originate
mortgage loans, they do have the authority to buy loans. If as a
result of their purchasing practices, these government sponsored
entities experience significantly higher-than-expected losses,
the experience could adversely affect overall investor
perception of the mortgage lending industry.
Competition in the industry can take many forms, including lower
interest rates and fees, less stringent underwriting standards,
convenience in obtaining a loan, customer service, amount and
term of a loan and marketing and distribution channels. The need
to maintain mortgage loan volume in this competitive environment
creates a risk of price and quality competition in the mortgage
industry. Price competition could cause us to lower the interest
rates that we charge borrowers, which could lower the value of
our loans we sell or retain in our portfolio. If our competitors
adopt less stringent underwriting standards, we will be
pressured to do so as well. If we do not relax underwriting
standards in response to our competitors, we may lose market
share. If we relax our underwriting standards in response to
price competition, we may be exposed to higher credit risk
without compensating pricing. Any increase in these pricing and
underwriting pressures could reduce the volume of our loan
originations and sales and significantly harm our business,
financial condition, liquidity and results of operations.
Government Regulation
We must comply with the laws, rules and regulations, as well as
judicial and administrative decisions, of all jurisdictions in
which we originate mortgage loans, as well as an extensive body
of federal laws, rules and regulations. The volume of new or
modified laws, rules and regulations applicable to our business
has
86
increased in recent years and individual municipalities have
also begun to enact laws, rules and regulations that restrict or
otherwise affect loan origination activities, and in some cases
loan servicing activities. The laws, rules and regulations of
each of these jurisdictions are different, complex and, in some
cases, in direct conflict with each other. It may become
increasingly difficult to identify comprehensively, to interpret
accurately, to program properly our information systems and to
effectively train our personnel with respect to all of these
laws, rules and regulations, thereby potentially increasing the
risks of non-compliance with these laws, rules and regulations.
Our failure to comply with these laws, rules and regulations can
lead to:
|
|
|
|
|
civil and criminal liability, including potential monetary
penalties; |
|
|
|
loss of state licenses or permits required for continued lending
and servicing operations; |
|
|
|
legal defenses causing delay or otherwise adversely affecting
our ability to enforce loans, or giving the borrower the right
to rescind or cancel the loan transaction; |
|
|
|
demands for indemnification or loan repurchases from purchasers
of our loans; |
|
|
|
class action lawsuits; and |
|
|
|
administrative enforcement actions. |
Some states in which we operate may impose regulatory
requirements on our officers and directors and parties holding
10%, and in some cases 5%, of our outstanding shares of common
stock. If any officer, director or person holding 10%, and in
some cases 5%, or more of our outstanding shares of common stock
fails to meet or refuses to comply with a states
applicable regulatory requirements for mortgage lending, we
could lose our authority to conduct business in that state. The
loss of our authority to conduct business in a state, for this
or any other reason, could have a material adverse effect on our
business, financial condition, liquidity and results of
operations.
In recent years, federal and several state and local laws, rules
and regulations have been adopted, or are under consideration,
that are intended to eliminate certain lending practices, often
referred to as predatory lending practices, that are
considered to be abusive. Many of these laws, rules and
regulations restrict commonly accepted lending activities and
would impose additional costly and burdensome compliance
requirements on us. These laws, rules and regulations impose
certain restrictions on loans on which certain points and fees
or the annual percentage rate, or APR, meets or exceeds
specified thresholds. Some of these restrictions expose a lender
to risks of litigation and regulatory sanction regardless of how
carefully a loan is underwritten. In addition, an increasing
number of these laws, rules and regulations seek to impose
liability for violations on the purchasers of mortgage loans,
regardless of whether a purchaser knew of or participated in the
violation. Accordingly, the third parties that buy our loans or
provide financing for our loan originations may not want, and
are not contractually required, to buy or finance loans that do
not comply with these laws, rules and regulations.
The continued enactment of these laws, rules and regulations may
prevent us from making certain loans and may cause us to reduce
the APR or the points and fees we charge on the mortgage loans
that we originate. In addition, the difficulty of managing the
compliance risks presented by these laws, rules and regulations
may decrease the availability of warehouse financing and the
overall demand for the purchase of our originated loans. These
laws, rules and regulations have increased, and may continue to
increase, our cost of doing business as we have been, and may
continue to be, required to develop systems and procedures to
ensure that we do not violate any aspect of these new
requirements.
In addition, many of these state laws, rules and regulations are
not applicable to the mortgage loan operations of national
banks, or other financial institutions chartered by the federal
government. Therefore, the mortgage loan operations of these
institutions are at a competitive advantage to us since they do
not have to comply with many of these laws.
Our goal is to avoid originating loans that meet or exceed the
APR or points and fees threshold of these laws,
rules and regulations except in the relatively small number of
states in which the laws, rules and
87
regulations relating to APR and points and fees
thresholds allow, in our judgment, these loans to be made within
our strict legal compliance standards and without undue risk
relative to litigation or to the enforcement of the loan
according to its terms. If we decide to relax our self-imposed
restrictions on originating loans subject to these laws, rules
and regulations, we will be subject to greater risks for actual
or perceived non-compliance with the laws, rules and
regulations, including demands for indemnification or loan
repurchases from the parties to whom we broker or sell loans,
class action lawsuits, increased defenses to foreclosure of
individual loans in default, individual claims for significant
monetary damages and administrative enforcement actions. Any of
the foregoing could significantly harm our business, cash flow,
financial condition, liquidity and results of operations.
The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and rules and regulations
promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission and the
New York Stock Exchange have increased the scope, complexity and
cost of corporate governance, reporting and disclosure
practices. These rules and regulations could also make it more
difficult for us to attract and retain qualified executive
officers and members of our board of directors, particularly to
serve on our audit committee.
USA PATRIOT Act
The President of the United States signed the USA PATRIOT Act
into law on October 26, 2001. The USA PATRIOT Act
establishes a wide variety of new and enhanced ways of combating
international terrorism. The provisions that affect national
banks and other financial institutions most directly are
contained in Title III of the act. In general,
Title III amends current law primarily the Bank
Secrecy Act to provide the Secretary of Treasury and
other departments and agencies of the federal government with
enhanced authority to identify, deter and punish international
money laundering and other crimes.
Among other things, the USA PATRIOT Act prohibits financial
institutions from doing business with foreign shell
banks and requires increased due diligence for private banking
transactions and correspondent accounts for foreign banks. In
addition, financial institutions will have to follow new minimum
verification of identity standards for all new accounts and will
be permitted to share information with law enforcement
authorities under circumstances that were not previously
permitted. These and other provisions of the USA PATRIOT Act
became effective at varying times and the Secretary of Treasury
and various federal banking agencies are responsible for issuing
regulations to implement the new law. To the extent the USA
PATRIOT Act applies to our mortgage banking operations, we may
be subject to additional burdens of compliance and potential
liability for failure to comply.
Environmental Exposure
In the course of our business, we may foreclose and take title
to residential properties securing our mortgage loans, and if we
do take title, we could be subject to environmental liabilities
with respect to these properties. In such a circumstance, we may
be held liable to a governmental entity or to third parties for
property damage, personal injury, investigation and clean-up
costs incurred by these parties in connection with environmental
contamination, or may be required to investigate or clean up
hazardous or toxic substances, or chemical releases at a
property. The costs associated with investigation or remediation
activities could be substantial. If we become subject to
significant environmental liabilities, our business, financial
condition, liquidity and results of operations could be
materially and adversely affected.
Employees
As of March 31, 2005, we had 810 full-time employees.
None of our employees are represented by a union or covered by a
collective bargaining agreement. We believe that our
compensation and benefits offered to our employees are
competitive and that our relations with our employees are good.
Facilities
Our principal offices are located at 1301 Avenue of the
Americas, New York, New York, where we sub-lease approximately
62,600 square feet of space from an unaffiliated party.
Additionally, as of March 31, 2005
88
we lease 31 full service branch office facilities and 32
satellite offices, none of which, individually, represent a
material expense to our operations. Our principal New York City
office rent expense is material to our operations. If we are
forced to vacate any of our facilities due to lease expirations
or any other reason, we believe that equally suitable
alternative locations are available in all areas where we
currently do business.
Legal Proceedings
Neither NYMC nor we are involved in any material litigation.
Because the nature of our business involves the collection of
numerous accounts, the validity of liens and compliance with
various state and federal lending laws, we are subject to
various legal proceedings in the ordinary course of our business
related to foreclosures, bankruptcies, condemnation and quiet
title actions, and alleged statutory and regulatory violations.
We are also subject to legal proceedings in the ordinary course
of business related to employment matters. These proceedings,
taken as a whole, have not had a material adverse effect on our
business, financial position or our results of operations nor do
we expect them to have such an effect in the future.
89
MANAGEMENT
Directors, Executive Officers and Key Employees
Our board of directors consists of nine directors. Of these nine
directors, we believe Messrs. Bock, Hainey, Norcutt,
Pembroke, Sherman and White are considered
independent in accordance with the requirements of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended and the New York
Stock Exchange. Our directors, executive officers and certain
key employees and their ages as of June 7, 2005, and their
positions with us, are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name |
|
Age | |
|
Title |
|
|
| |
|
|
Steven B. Schnall
|
|
|
38 |
|
|
Chairman of the Board and Co-Chief Executive Officer
|
David A. Akre
|
|
|
47 |
|
|
Director and Co-Chief Executive Officer
|
Raymond A. Redlingshafer, Jr.
|
|
|
49 |
|
|
Director, President and Chief Investment Officer
|
David R. Bock
|
|
|
61 |
|
|
Director
|
Alan L. Hainey
|
|
|
59 |
|
|
Director
|
Steven G. Norcutt
|
|
|
45 |
|
|
Director
|
Mary Dwyer Pembroke
|
|
|
47 |
|
|
Director
|
Jerome F. Sherman
|
|
|
65 |
|
|
Director
|
Thomas W. White
|
|
|
67 |
|
|
Director
|
Michael I. Wirth
|
|
|
47 |
|
|
Chief Financial Officer, Executive Vice President, Secretary and
Treasurer
|
Steven R. Mumma
|
|
|
46 |
|
|
Chief Operating Officer and Vice President
|
Joseph V. Fierro
|
|
|
45 |
|
|
Chief Operating Officer of NYMC
|
Executive Officers
Steven B. Schnall is our Chairman and Co-Chief Executive
Officer. Prior to co-founding NYMT, Mr. Schnall co-founded
NYMC in 1998, where he has served since inception as President
and Chief Executive Officer. From 1992 until 1998,
Mr. Schnall founded and served as the President of New York
Mortgage Corp., one of the predecessors of NYMC. Prior to
forming New York Mortgage Corp. in 1992, Mr. Schnall worked
for Price Waterhouse, a big eight public accounting firm.
Mr. Schnall received a B.S. cum laude in Accounting
from the University of Florida.
David A. Akre is our Co-Chief Executive Officer. Prior to
co-founding NYMT, Mr. Akre served as Vice President in
Capital Markets at Thornburg Mortgage Corporation, a publicly
traded residential mortgage REIT, from 1997 to 2003. From 1995
to 1997, Mr. Akre was a whole loan trader at Principal
Asset Markets, a subsidiary of Principal Life, a boutique whole
loan broker-dealer located in New Jersey. From 1988 to 1995,
Mr. Akre served in a variety of positions, including Vice
President, at GE Capital Mortgage Corporation. These
positions included responsibility for mortgage pipeline hedging,
bidding bulk fixed-rate loan pools, securitization of specific
mortgage portfolios for public pension funds, and brokering
loans between mortgage insurance clients. From 1985 to 1988,
Mr. Akre worked in institutional taxable fixed income sales
for Security Pacific Merchant Bank in New York, and prior to
that, Mr. Akre worked in mortgage origination for three
mortgage banking companies in New York. Mr. Akre received a
B.S. in Nautical Science from the United States Merchant Marine
Academy.
Raymond A. Redlingshafer, Jr. is our President and
Chief Investment Officer. Prior to co-founding NYMT,
Mr. Redlingshafer served as the Managing Director of
Pedestal Capital, an internet-based trading platform used by
institutional investors and dealers to transact in
mortgage-backed securities, from 2000 to 2001. From 1998 to
2000, Mr. Redlingshafer served as Vice President of
Mortgage Capital Markets for Salomon Smith Barney in mortgage
trading. From 1995 to 1998, Mr. Redlingshafer served as
National Director of Securities Marketing for Freddie Mac where
he managed a team that marketed Freddie Mac securities to
domestic and international fixed income investors. Prior to
joining Freddie Mac, Mr. Redlingshafer was with
UBS-PaineWebber from 1988 to 1995, where he started the ARMS
trading desk
90
and held a variety of mortgage trading positions before being
promoted to Mortgage Sales & Product Manager.
Mr. Redlingshafer began his career in 1983 with Goldman
Sachs & Co. as a whole loan mortgage trader and was one
of the original members of Goldmans mortgage department.
Mr. Redlingshafer received a B.S. in Business
Administration, as well as a J.D. and an M.B.A., from Creighton
University.
Michael I. Wirth is our Chief Financial Officer. Prior to
co-founding New York Mortgage Trust, Mr. Wirth served from
2002 to 2003 as Chief Financial Officer of Newcastle Investment
Corp., a publicly traded mortgage REIT. Mr. Wirth also
served as a Senior Vice President of Fortress Investment Group,
the external advisor of Newcastle, from 2002 to 2003. From 2000
to 2002, Mr. Wirth served as the Senior Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer of the following three publicly traded
companies: Charter Municipal Mortgage Acceptance Company, a
residential finance company; American Mortgage Acceptance
Company, a mortgage REIT; and Aegis Realty Inc., a retail
property REIT. Mr. Wirth also served as a Senior Vice
President of Related Capital Company, which externally managed
each of the foregoing companies from 2000 to 2002. From 1997 to
2000, Mr. Wirth served as a Vice President at CGA
Investment Management, a monoline insurer of structured debt and
an investor in real estate and asset-backed securities. From
1988 to 1997, Mr. Wirth was a Senior Manager with the Real
Estate Consulting Practice of Deloitte & Touche where
he specialized in real estate capital markets and the financial
services industry. From 1986 to 1988, Mr. Wirth was the
Chief Financial Officer of Cochran Properties, Inc., a
commercial real estate development company based in Atlanta,
Georgia. Mr. Wirth was a Senior Accountant with Deloitte
Haskins & Sells specializing in real estate and banking
from 1983 to 1986. Mr. Wirth received a B.B.A. in
Accountancy from Georgia State University and is a member of the
American Institute of Certified Public Accountants.
Steven R. Mumma is our Chief Operating Officer. From 2000
to 2003, Mr. Mumma was a Vice President of Natexis ABM
Corp, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Natexis Banques Populaires.
From 1997 to 2000, Mr. Mumma served as a Vice President of
Mortgage-Backed Securities trading for Credit Agricole. Prior to
joining Credit Agricole, from 1988 to 1997, Mr. Mumma was a
Vice President of Natexis ABM Corp. Prior to joining Natexis ABM
Corp, from 1986 to 1988, Mr. Mumma was a Controller for
PaineWebber Real Estate Securities Inc., the mortgage-backed
trading subsidiary of PaineWebber Inc. Prior to joining
PaineWebber, from 1984 to 1985, Mr. Mumma worked for
Citibank in its Capital Markets Group, as well as for
Ernst & Young. Mr. Mumma is a Certified Public
Accountant, and received a B.B.A. cum laude from Texas
A&M University.
Joseph V. Fierro is NYMCs Chief Operating Officer.
He co-founded NYMC, where he has served as the Chief Operating
Officer since 1998. Prior to co-founding NYMC, Mr. Fierro
was the founder in 1989 and President of First Security
Financial Services, Inc., a wholesale mortgage banker providing
niche mortgage products to mortgage brokers nationwide. During
this time, Mr. Fierro served on the advisory committees for
Shearson-Lehman Mortgage and Household Mortgage Services. Prior
to founding First Security Financial Services, from 1984 to
1989, Mr. Fierro was employed as Senior Vice President at
Resource Mortgage Banking Ltd., one of the first mortgage
banking firms licensed by the State of New York. Mr. Fierro
attended Newburgh Free Academy and Mount St. Marys
College, where he studied Computer Science and Business
Management.
Directors
David R. Bock serves as a member of our board of
directors. Mr. Bock is Chief Financial Officer of I-Trax,
Inc., a publicly traded (AMEX) healthcare company, a
position he has held since 2004. From 1995 to 2004,
Mr. Bock was a Managing Partner of Federal City Capital
Advisors, a strategic consulting and advisory firm, which is the
successor firm to Maitland Ruick and Company, where he has
served since 1995. During this period, Mr. Bock also served
as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of
Pedestal Inc., an online mortgage-backed securities trading
platform, from 2000 until 2002. From 1992 to 1995, Mr. Bock
served as a Managing Director at Lehman Brothers. Prior to
joining Lehman Brothers, Mr. Bock served as Director,
Operations Staff at The World Bank, where he was responsible for
integrating policy, strategy and budget across four geographic
regions and where he served as a member of the banks
senior management investment committee. Mr. Bock also
served in a number of other management positions at The World
Bank from 1974 to 1979 and 1982 to 1989 including Director, Bank
Group Financial Policy, Director, Country Debt
91
Restructuring and Liability Management and Division Chief,
Funding Strategy. From 1979 to 1982, Mr. Bock was a partner
of Atlantic Resources, a merchant bank focused on energy,
agriculture and transportation projects in the Mid-Atlantic
region of the U.S. Prior to this, Mr. Bock was an
associate at McKinsey & Company. Mr. Bock received
a B.A. in Philosophy from the University of Washington and
M.Phil. in Economics from Oxford University, where he was a
Rhodes Scholar.
Alan L. Hainey serves as a member of our board of
directors. Mr. Hainey is the owner and manager of Carolina
Dominion, LLC, a real estate brokerage development and
investment firm that he founded in 2004. In 2001,
Mr. Hainey incorporated and funded the Merrill L. Hainey
Family Foundation, a not-for-profit charitable organization
dedicated to academic achievement through scholarships, where he
continues to serve as President. From 1996 to 2000,
Mr. Hainey operated an independent consulting practice
providing advisory and marketing services to clients engaged in
insurance, mortgage finance and investment management. From 1990
to 1996, Mr. Hainey served as President and Chief Operating
Officer of GE Capitals mortgage banking businesses and was
a member of the GE Capital corporate executive council. From
1983 to 1990, Mr. Hainey served as President of
GE Capital Mortgage Securities. Mr. Hainey received a
B.A. with honors and a J.D. from the University of Missouri and
a Master of Management with distinction from the Kellogg School
of Northwestern University.
Steven G. Norcutt serves as a member of our board of
directors. Since May 2001, Mr. Norcutt has served as
Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer of
Centennial Mortgage and Funding, Inc., a residential mortgage
banking company based in Minnesota. Mr. Norcutts
responsibilities at Centennial Mortgage and Funding, Inc.,
include oversight of firm profitability, diversification of
product mix, recruiting, technology, production management,
financial management and financial reporting. Prior to joining
Centennial Mortgage and Funding, Inc., Mr. Norcutt served
as Senior Vice President and Portfolio Manager of Structured
Finance for Reliastar Investment Research, Inc. from 1993
through 2001. Mr. Norcutt joined Reliastar Investment
Research, Inc. in 1988 as Vice President and Portfolio Manager
of Residential Mortgage Loans. Mr. Norcutt received a
M.B.A. in Finance from the University of Minnesota and a B.S. in
Finance from St. Cloud State University.
Mary Dwyer Pembroke serves as a member of our board of
directors. Ms. Pembroke serves as Director of the Campaign
for Special Olympics, a position she has held since 2004.
Ms. Pembroke has served as a government relations
strategist for the Student Loan Marketing Association from 2003
to 2004 and served as Counsel, Government Relations for
BlackBird Technologies from 2001 to 2003. From 2001 to 2002,
Ms. Pembroke served as a government relations consultant
for Freddie Mac and from 1994 to 2001 Ms. Pembroke served
as the Director, Government Relations for Freddie Mac. Prior to
her service with Freddie Mac, Ms. Pembroke served as a
Manager, International Risk Assessment with
FMC Corporation, a Manager, Government Relations and
Community Development with Citibank, counsel to the Housing and
Urban Affairs Subcommittee of the United States Senate Banking
Committee and as a legislative assistant to a United States
Congressman. Ms. Pembroke is currently Campaign Director
for Special Olympics International. Ms. Pembroke received a
B.A. in History, Political Science and French from Marquette
University and a J.D. from Marquette University.
Jerome F. Sherman serves as a member of our board of
directors. Dr. Sherman is a recently retired Finance
Professor from Creighton University. Since May 1999,
Dr. Sherman has worked as a financial consultant to various
corporations and as an economic and financial expert in
litigation matters. Prior to that time, Dr. Sherman spent
29 years teaching both undergraduate and graduate finance
courses at Creighton University and the University of
Nebraska-Lincoln. Prior to that time, Dr. Sherman spent
five years as a registered representative and owner of a small
brokerage firm and five years in the research and corporate
finance departments of two regional brokerage firms.
Dr. Sherman has served on a variety of corporate and civic
boards in Omaha and other locations in the Midwest.
Dr. Sherman has served as an economics and financial expert
in more than 1,500 legal proceedings during the past thirty
years. Dr. Sherman received a B.S. in Mathematics from
Regis College, a M.A. in Finance and Economics from Memphis
State University and a Ph.D. in Finance from the University of
Mississippi.
92
Thomas W. White serves as a member of our board of
directors. Since 2003, Mr. White has served as Senior
Advisor to Beekman Advisors, a strategic financial advisory and
investment management firm focused on the affordable housing
sector. Since 2001, Mr. White has served as a member of the
board of trustees of Charter Mac where he also serves as a
member of the boards investment committee. Mr. White
also serves on the board of directors of the Enterprise Social
Investment Company, a for-profit subsidiary of the Enterprise
Foundation. In 2001, Mr. White retired as a Senior Vice
President of Fannie Mae where he has, served in a variety of
positions since 1987. From 1986 to 1987, Mr. White served
as an investment banker with Bear Stearns, Inc. From 1979 to
1986, Mr. White was the executive vice president of the
National Council of State Housing Agencies. Mr. White
received a B.A. in History from Wayne State University.
Our board of directors currently consists of nine directors, six
of whom we believe to be independent directors under the
standards imposed by the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended, and the New York Stock Exchange.
Our board of directors is not divided into classes; therefore,
our entire board of directors will be elected each year to serve
until the next annual meeting of stockholders and until a
successor is duly elected and qualifies. Our authorized number
of directors may be changed only by resolution of the board of
directors.
Audit Committee. Our audit committee consists of three
independent directors, one of whom serves as the chairperson and
one of whom serves as the audit committee financial expert as
defined in applicable Securities and Exchange Commission and
New York Stock Exchange regulations. The audit committee
assists the board of directors in its general oversight of our
financial reporting, internal controls and audit functions. Our
audit committee has adopted an audit committee charter that
defines the audit committees primary duties to include:
|
|
|
|
|
serving as an independent and objective body to monitor and
assess our compliance with legal and regulatory requirements,
our financial reporting process and related internal contract
systems and the performance generally of our internal audit
function; |
|
|
|
overseeing the audit and other services of our outside auditors
and being directly responsible for the appointment,
independence, qualifications, compensation and oversight of our
outside auditors, who will report directly to the audit
committee; |
|
|
|
providing an open means of communication among our outside
auditors, accountants, financial and senior management, our
internal audit department, our corporate compliance department
and our board of directors; |
|
|
|
resolving any disagreements between our management and our
independent auditors regarding our financial reporting; |
|
|
|
meeting at least quarterly with our senior executives, internal
audit staff and independent auditors; and |
|
|
|
preparing the audit committee report for inclusion in our annual
proxy statements for our annual stockholder meeting. |
Our audit committee charter also mandates that our audit
committee approve all audit, audit-related, tax and other
services conducted by our independent auditors.
Compensation Committee. Our compensation committee
consists of three independent directors. Our compensation
committee has adopted a compensation committee charter that
defines the compensation committees primary duties to
include:
|
|
|
|
|
establishing guidelines and standards for determining the
compensation of our executive officers; |
|
|
|
evaluating the performance of our senior executives; |
93
|
|
|
|
|
reviewing our executive compensation policies; |
|
|
|
recommending to our board of directors compensation levels for
our executive officers; |
|
|
|
administering and implementing our equity incentive plans; |
|
|
|
determining the number of shares underlying, and the terms of,
restricted common stock, and stock options to be granted to our
directors, executive officers and other employees pursuant to
our equity incentive plans; and |
|
|
|
preparing a report on executive compensation for inclusion in
our annual proxy statement for our annual stockholder meeting. |
Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. Our
nominating and corporate governance committee consists of three
independent directors. Our nominating and corporate governance
committee has adopted a nominating and corporate governance
committee charter that defines the nominating and corporate
governance committees primary duties to include:
|
|
|
|
|
establishing standards for service on our board of directors; |
|
|
|
identifying individuals qualified to become members of our board
of directors and recommending director candidates for election
or re-election to our board; |
|
|
|
considering and making recommendations to our board of directors
regarding board size and composition, committee composition and
structure and procedures affecting directors; and |
|
|
|
monitoring our corporate governance principles and practices,
our human resource practices and our fulfillment of our
obligations of fairness in internal and external matters. |
Director Compensation
Any member of our board of directors who is also our employee
does not receive additional compensation for serving on our
board of directors. Our non-employee directors receive an annual
retainer of $25,000 and a fee of $1,000 for each full board
meeting attended in person, a fee of $750 for each committee
meeting attended in person and that occurs on a date different
from a full board meeting date and a fee of $500 for each full
board or committee meeting attended telephonically. In addition,
each non-employee director who is a committee chairman receives
an annual retainer of $7,500 for the audit committee chairman,
$6,000 for the compensation committee chairman and $5,000 for
the chairmen of other committees. We also reimburse our
directors for their reasonable travel expenses, if any, incurred
in connection with their attendance at full board and committee
meetings.
Our non-employee directors are eligible to receive restricted
stock and option awards under our stock incentive plan. Each of
our non-employee directors received 2,500 shares of our
common stock upon completion of our IPO, and have been granted
2,500 shares of restricted for their service on our board
of directors in 2005. These restricted stock awards granted in
2005 will vest immediately upon issuance.
Executive Compensation
The following table sets forth (i) the total annual
compensation paid to our co-chief executive officers and our
next four most highly compensated executive officers for 2004
(collectively, the named executive officers) and
(ii) the total compensation paid by NYMC to
Mr. Schnall, as Chief Executive Officer and member, and
Mr. Fierro, as Chief Operating Officer and member, for the
year ended December 31, 2003. We were organized in
September 2003, did not conduct any operations prior to our IPO
in June 2004 and,
94
accordingly, did not pay any compensation to Messrs. Akre,
Redlingshafer, Wirth or Mumma during the year ended
December 31, 2003.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Annual Compensation | |
|
Long-Term Compensation | |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted | |
|
Securities | |
|
|
|
|
Fiscal | |
|
|
|
Other Annual | |
|
Stock | |
|
Underlying | |
|
All Other | |
Name and Position |
|
Year | |
|
Salary(1) | |
|
Bonus | |
|
Compensation | |
|
Awards(2) | |
|
Options (#)(3) | |
|
Compensation(4) | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Steven B. Schnall
|
|
|
2004 |
|
|
$ |
390,000 |
|
|
$ |
195,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
713,520 |
|
|
|
123,550 |
|
|
$ |
19,016 |
|
|
Chairman and Co-CEO
|
|
|
2003 |
|
|
|
221,250 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
16,275,447 |
(5) |
David A. Akre
|
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
390,000 |
|
|
|
195,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
955,830 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,403 |
|
|
Co-CEO
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Raymond A. Redlingshafer, Jr.
|
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
390,000 |
|
|
|
195,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
955,830 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,432 |
|
|
President and CIO
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Michael I. Wirth
|
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
320,000 |
|
|
|
160,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
744,300 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,544 |
|
|
CFO
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Steven R. Mumma
|
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
212,000 |
|
|
|
150,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
295,970 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,944 |
|
|
COO
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Joseph V. Fierro
|
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
315,000 |
|
|
|
157,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
305,800 |
|
|
|
52,950 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
COO of NYMC
|
|
|
2003 |
|
|
|
221,250 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,253,025 |
(6) |
|
|
(1) |
Amounts for 2004 are annualized. The officers only received a
pro rated portion of the amounts shown based on the number of
days from the closing of our IPO through December 31, 2004. |
|
(2) |
Based on an initial public offering price of $9.00 per
share. |
|
(3) |
These options to purchase shares of our common stock were
granted upon completion of our IPO and are fully vested and have
an exercise price equal to the initial public offering price of
$9.00. |
|
(4) |
Under the employment agreements for these individuals, we will
reimburse the premiums payable for life insurance policies in
the amount of $3.0 million per person (the amount with
respect to Mr. Mumma will be $1.5 million) and
supplemental long-term disability insurance policies for these
individuals during the terms of the agreements. Certain policies
for Mr. Fierro and Mr. Redlingshafer are in the
process of being determined, but we do not expect the premiums
for these policies to exceed $20,000 per person. |
|
(5) |
Represents $4,842,897 in cash distributions paid and the
issuance of a promissory note in the original principal amount
of $12,132,550, which was subsequently reduced to $11,432,550.
The note was repaid from the proceeds of our IPO. |
|
(6) |
Represents $1,978,673 in cash distributions paid and the
issuance of a promissory note in the original principal amount
of $2,574,352, which was subsequently reduced to $2,274,352. The
note was repaid from the proceeds of our IPO. |
95
Restricted Stock Awards
Our stock incentive plan allows for the grant of stock awards to
our officers, directors, employees and other persons who provide
services to us. See Stock and Benefit Plans
2005 Stock Incentive Plan below. We have granted an
aggregate of 412,125 stock awards to the executive officers,
directors and key employees set forth in the table below upon
completion of our IPO, and have granted an additional
15,000 shares to our non-employee directors for their
service on our board of directors in March 2005. These stock
awards have voting and dividend rights. One-third of the awards
shown below to Messrs. Schnall, Akre, Redlingshafer, Wirth,
Fierro and Mumma were unrestricted upon the date of grant and
two-thirds are subject to forfeiture restrictions that terminate
ratably over the three-year period from the date of grant. The
awards shown below to our directors are not subject to any
forfeiture restrictions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Initial Award of | |
|
|
|
|
Restricted | |
|
March 2005 Award of | |
Name |
|
Stock | |
|
Restricted Stock | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Executive Officers
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Steven B. Schnall
|
|
|
71,352 |
|
|
|
|
|
David A. Akre
|
|
|
95,583 |
|
|
|
|
|
Raymond A. Redlingshafer, Jr.
|
|
|
95,583 |
|
|
|
|
|
Michael I. Wirth
|
|
|
74,430 |
|
|
|
|
|
Steven R. Mumma
|
|
|
29,597 |
|
|
|
|
|
Joseph V. Fierro
|
|
|
30,580 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Directors
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
David R. Bock
|
|
|
2,500 |
|
|
|
2,500 |
|
Alan L. Hainey
|
|
|
2,500 |
|
|
|
2,500 |
|
Steven G. Norcutt
|
|
|
2,500 |
|
|
|
2,500 |
|
Mary Dwyer Pembroke
|
|
|
2,500 |
|
|
|
2,500 |
|
Jerome F. Sherman
|
|
|
2,500 |
|
|
|
2,500 |
|
Thomas W. White
|
|
|
2,500 |
|
|
|
2,500 |
|
Option/SAR Grants in Last Fiscal Year
The following table provides information on options granted to
our named executive officers in fiscal year 2004.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Individual Grants | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent of | |
|
|
|
|
|
Potential Realizable Value | |
|
|
Number of | |
|
Total | |
|
|
|
|
|
at Assumed Annual Rates | |
|
|
Securities | |
|
Options | |
|
Exercise | |
|
|
|
of Stock Price Appreciation | |
|
|
Underlying | |
|
Granted to | |
|
Price | |
|
|
|
for Option Term | |
|
|
Options | |
|
Employees in | |
|
per | |
|
Expiration | |
|
| |
Name of Grantee |
|
Granted(1) | |
|
2004 | |
|
Share | |
|
Date(2) | |
|
5% | |
|
10% | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Steven B. Schnall
|
|
|
123,550 |
|
|
|
22.2 |
% |
|
$ |
9.00 |
|
|
|
June 29, 2014 |
|
|
$ |
613,049 |
|
|
$ |
1,509,970 |
|
David A. Akre
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Raymond A. Redlingshafer, Jr.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Michael I. Wirth
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Steven R. Mumma
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Joseph V. Fierro
|
|
|
52,950 |
|
|
|
9.5 |
% |
|
$ |
9.00 |
|
|
|
June 29, 2014 |
|
|
$ |
262,735 |
|
|
$ |
647,130 |
|
|
|
(1) |
All options became fully vested on June 29, 2004. |
|
(2) |
Ten years from date of grant. |
96
Aggregated Option Exercises in 2004 and December 31,
2004 Option Values
The following table provides information on option exercises in
2004 by the named executive officers, and the value of each such
officers unexercised options at December 31, 2004.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of Securities | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Underlying | |
|
Value of Unexercised | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unexercised Options at | |
|
In-the-Money Options at | |
|
|
Shares | |
|
|
|
December 31, 2004 | |
|
December 31, 2004(1) | |
|
|
Acquired | |
|
Value |
|
| |
|
| |
Name |
|
on Exercise | |
|
Realized |
|
Exercisable | |
|
Unexercisable | |
|
Exercisable | |
|
Unexercisable | |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Steven B. Schnall
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
123,550 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
271,810 |
|
|
|
|
|
David A. Akre
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Raymond A.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Redlingshafer, Jr.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Michael I. Wirth
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Steven R. Mumma
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Joseph V. Fierro
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
52,950 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
116,490 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
Market value of underlying securities on December 31, 2004,
less the exercise price. Market value is based on the closing
price of our common stock on the NYSE on December 31, 2004
of $11.20 per share. |
Employment Agreements
We have entered into employment agreements with each of the
executive officers named in the executive compensation table
above. The employment agreements provide for certain stock and
option based awards under our 2004 Stock Incentive Plan, which
stock incentive plan has been replaced by our recently approved
2005 Stock Incentive Plan. For a list of the initial awards of
restricted stock made under the 2004 Stock Incentive Plan to
each of these executive officers during the fiscal year 2004,
see the section entitled Restricted Stock Awards
above. The employment agreements also provide that these
executive officers are eligible to receive annual cash incentive
bonuses under our approved bonus plans.
These employment agreements will expire on December 31,
2008, unless further extended or sooner terminated. Commencing
on January 1, 2005, and on each January 1 thereafter, the
term of each of these employment agreements will be
automatically extended for one additional calendar year, unless
we or the executive provides the other with a notice of
non-renewal by no later than the October 31 immediately
preceding such January 1. These agreements provided the
following annual base salaries for the fiscal year 2005: Steven
B. Schnall, $409,500; David A. Akre, $409,500; Raymond A.
Redlingshafer, Jr., $409,500; Michael I. Wirth, $336,000;
Joseph V. Fierro, $330,750; and Steven R. Mumma, $300,000.
Effective each January 1 thereafter each of these base salaries
will receive a minimum percentage increase equal to the increase
in the Consumer Price Index for the preceding year. These
agreements also provide that the executives are eligible to
participate in our annual cash incentive bonus plan adopted by
our compensation committee for each fiscal year during the term
providing for cash bonuses of up to two times the
executives base salary.
These agreements provide that the executive officers agree to
devote substantially all of their business time to our
operations (except as we otherwise agree, including on behalf of
any of our subsidiaries); provided however that the executives
named above are not precluded from serving as a director or
trustee in any other firm or from pursuing real estate
investments and other personal investments, as long as those
activities do not interfere with the performance of the
executives duties or violate the non-competition
provisions in the agreements. These employment agreements permit
us to terminate the executives employment with appropriate
notice for or without cause. Cause is
generally defined to mean:
|
|
|
|
|
committing fraud or misappropriating, stealing or embezzling
funds or property from us or our affiliates, or attempting to
secure personally any profit in connection with any transaction
entered into or on our behalf or on behalf of our affiliates; |
97
|
|
|
|
|
knowingly violating or breaching any material law or regulation
to the material detriment of us or our affiliates; |
|
|
|
conviction of, or the entry of a plea of guilty or nolo
contendere to, a felony which in the reasonable opinion of the
board of directors brings the executive into disrepute or is
likely to cause material harm to our business, customer or
suppliers relations, financial condition or prospects; |
|
|
|
a willful failure by the executive to perform his material
duties under the employment agreement that continues for a
period of 30 days after written notice to the
executive; or |
|
|
|
the breach of any non-competition, non-disclosure or
non-solicitation agreement between the executive and us that
causes or is reasonably likely to cause material harm to us. |
In addition, each of the executives named above has the right
under his employment agreement to resign for good
reason in the event of (a) an assignment to the
executive of any material duties inconsistent with the
executives position with us or a substantial adverse
alteration in the nature or status of the executives
responsibilities without the consent of the executive;
(b) a material reduction in employee benefits other than a
reduction generally applicable to similarly situated executives
of our company without the consent of the executive; (c) a
failure on our part to comply with any material provision of the
employment that is not cured within 30 days after written
notice to us; (d) any failure on our part to pay the
executives base salary or any incentive bonus to which the
executive is entitled under our bonus plan that, in either case,
is not cured within ten days after written notice to us, or any
failure of our compensation committee to approve a bonus plan
for any fiscal year; and (e) the relocation of our
principal place of business outside of a fifty mile radius of
Midtown Manhattan without the consent of the executive. In
addition, for Mr. Schnall only, for so long as he
beneficially owns at least 1,000,000 shares of our common
stock, good reason shall also include (i) a
failure on the part of our board of directors to nominate
Mr. Schnall for re-election to our board of directors,
(ii) a failure on the part of our stockholders to re-elect
Mr. Schnall as a member of our board of directors or
(iii) any removal by our board of directors or stockholders
of Mr. Schnall from our board of directors, other than a
removal for cause.
Pursuant to their employment agreement, the executives named
above receive four weeks of paid vacation annually and various
other customary benefits. In addition, we have purchased a term
life insurance policy for each of the executives named above,
with a death benefit of $3.0 million (except for
Mr. Mumma, whose death benefit is $1.5 million), and
will also reimburse each of the named executives for the income
tax they incur with respect to our payment of the premiums on
these policies.
We have the right to obtain a key man life insurance policy for
our benefit on the life of each of our executives.
The employment agreements referred to above also provide that
the named executives are eligible to receive the same benefits,
including medical insurance coverage and retirement plan
benefits in a 401(k) plan to the same extent as other similarly
situated employees, and such other benefits as are commensurate
with their position. Participation in employee benefit plans
will be subject to the terms of such benefit plans as in effect
from time to time.
If the executives employment is terminated for
cause or the executive resigns other than for
good reason, we will pay the executive his full base
salary through to the date of termination and reimburse the
executive for all reasonable and customary expenses associated
with his employment by us through the date of termination. If
however, we terminate the executive without cause (other than
for death or disability) or the executive terminates his
employment for good reason, we will be obligated to pay
(a) any earned and accrued but unpaid installment of base
salary through the date of termination and all other unpaid and
pro rata amounts to which the executive is entitled as of the
date of termination under any compensation plan or program of
ours, including the annual bonus plan and all accrued but unused
vacation time; (b) a lump sum payment of an amount equal to
(i) the sum of the executives base salary in effect
as of the date of termination plus the executives highest
annual bonus earned in the last three fiscal years multiplied by
(ii) the lesser of (A) three or (B) the number of
whole months remaining under the employment agreement divided by
12;
98
(c) the payment of premiums for group health coverage for
18 months following the date of termination; and
(d) other benefits as provided for in such employment
agreement.
In the event we deliver to the executive a notice of non-renewal
of his employment agreement, the executive will have the right
to resign at any time during the remainder of his employment
term and we will be obligated to pay (a) any earned and
accrued but unpaid installment of base salary through the date
of termination and all other unpaid and pro rata amounts to
which the executive is entitled as of the date of termination
under any compensation plan or program of ours, including the
annual bonus plan and all accrued but unused vacation time;
(b) a lump sum payment of an amount equal to the sum of the
executives base salary in effect as of the date of
termination plus the executives highest annual bonus
earned in the last three fiscal years; (c) the payment of
premiums for group health coverage for 18 months following
the date of termination; and (d) other benefits as provided
for in such employment agreement.
In addition, in the event of a termination of an
executives employment by us for any reason other than for
cause, or any resignation by an executive following receipt from
us of a notice of non-renewal, all of the options, restricted
stock awards and any other equity awards granted to such
executive shall become fully vested, unrestricted and
exercisable as of the date of termination.
Our obligation to make payments to an executive as described
above is conditioned on the executives delivery to us of a
general release of all claims against us.
Upon a change in control of us, all of the options, restricted
stock awards and any other equity awards granted to such
executive shall become fully vested, unrestricted and
exercisable as of the date of termination. In general terms, a
change of control of us will be deemed to occur:
|
|
|
|
|
if a person or entity, acting alone or as part of a
group within the meaning of Section 13(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, acquires more
than 50% of our then outstanding voting securities; |
|
|
|
if the holders of our outstanding voting securities approve the
transfer of all or substantially all of our total assets on a
consolidated basis; |
|
|
|
if the holders of our outstanding voting securities approve a
transaction pursuant to which we will undergo a merger,
consolidation, or statutory share exchange (unless the holders
of our voting shares immediately prior to the transaction have
at least 50% of the combined voting power of the securities in
the surviving entity resulting from the transaction or its
parent); |
|
|
|
if the holders of our outstanding voting securities approve a
plan of complete liquidation or upon the liquidation,
dissolution, sale or disposition of all or substantially all of
our assets; |
|
|
|
if a majority of the members of our board of directors votes in
favor of a resolution stating that a change in control of us has
occurred; or |
|
|
|
if our continuing directors cease for any reason to constitute a
majority of the members of our board of directors. |
During an executives employment with us and for a
24 month period after termination of an executives
employment for any reason (other than a resignation following
receipt by the executive of a notice of non-renewal, in which
case the period shall be 12 months after termination), each
executive under these employment agreements has agreed not to
compete with us by working with or investing in (subject to
certain limited exceptions) any enterprise engaged in our
principal line of business, or a line of business that we plan
on entering, in any state where we presently conduct or intend
to conduct business. In addition, each executive under these
employment agreements has agreed to not solicit, induce or
attempt to induce any person who has been employed by us or our
affiliates, suppliers, licensees or consultants within six
months prior to the date of termination.
99
Stock and Benefit Plans
|
|
|
2005 Stock Incentive Plan |
This summary is qualified in its entirety by the detailed
provisions of our 2005 Stock Incentive Plan. We sometimes refer
to our 2005 Stock Incentive Plan in this prospectus as the 2005
Plan. The purpose of the 2005 Plan is to provide incentives to
our employees, non-employee directors and other service
providers to stimulate their efforts toward our continued
success, long-term growth and profitability and to attract,
reward and retain key personnel.
Administration. The 2005 Plan is administered by the
compensation committee of our board of directors. The
compensation committee may delegate to one or more of our
officers all or part of the committees authority and
duties under the 2005 Plan, except as to participants who are
subject to Section 16 of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934. This summary uses the term compensation
committee to refer to the compensation committee of our
board of directors and any delegate of the compensation
committee.
Subject to the terms of the 2005 Plan, the compensation
committee may select participants who receive awards and will
determine the types of awards and the terms and conditions of
awards. The compensation committee also may interpret the
provisions of the 2005 Plan.
Source of Shares. The shares of common stock issued or to
be issued under the 2005 Plan consist of authorized but unissued
shares. If any shares covered by an award are not purchased or
are forfeited, if an award is settled in cash or if an award
otherwise terminates without issuance and delivery of any shares
of common stock, then the number of shares of common stock
counted against the aggregate number of shares available under
the 2005 Plan with respect to the award will, to the extent of
any such forfeiture or termination, again be available for
making awards under the 2005 Plan. The number of shares of
common stock reserved for future issuance under the 2005 Plan
either as restricted stock awards or pursuant to the exercise of
stock options is 1,296,471. The shares reserved for issuance
under our stock incentive plan may be increased by up to 54,000
shares if the underwriters exercise their over-allotment option
in connection with this offering.
Eligibility. Awards may be made under the 2005 Plan to
our or our affiliates employees, outside directors and to
any other individual or entity who provides services to us or an
affiliate and whose participation in the 2005 Plan is determined
to be in our best interests by our board of directors.
Options. The 2005 Plan permits the grant of options to
purchase shares of common stock intended to qualify as incentive
stock options under the Internal Revenue Code, and stock options
that do not qualify as incentive stock options, referred to as
nonqualified stock options. The exercise price of each stock
option may not be less than 100% of the fair market value of our
common stock on the date of grant. We may grant options in
substitution for options held by employees of companies that we
may acquire. In this case, the exercise price would be adjusted
to preserve the economic value of the employees stock
option from his or her former employer.
The term of each stock option will be fixed by the compensation
committee and may not exceed 10 years from the date of
grant. The compensation committee will determine at what time or
times each option may be exercised and the period of time, if
any, after termination of employment during which options may be
exercised. The exercisability of options may be accelerated by
the compensation committee. Except in the case of changes in our
capitalization, the exercise price of an option may not be
reduced after its grant without the approval of our stockholders.
In general, an optionee may pay the exercise price of an option
by cash, certified check, by tendering shares of our common
stock (which, if acquired from us, have been held by the
optionee for at least six months) or by means of a
broker-assisted cashless exercise. Stock options granted under
the 2005 Plan may not be sold, transferred, pledged or assigned
other than by will or under applicable laws of descent and
distribution. However, we may permit limited transfers of
nonqualified options for the benefit of immediate family members
of participants to help with estate planning concerns.
Stock Awards. The 2005 Plan also permits the grant of
shares of our common stock in the form of stock awards. A
participants rights in the stock award may be
nontransferable or forfeitable or both for a period of
100
time or subject to the attainment of certain goals tied to the
performance criteria described below. These performance goals
may include, for example, a requirement that we or any of our
affiliates or the participant achieve objectives based on any of
the performance criteria listed below. Unrestricted shares of
common stock, which are shares of common stock awarded at no
cost to the participant or for a purchase price determined by
the compensation committee, may also be issued under the 2005
Plan.
Incentive Awards. Incentive awards entitle the
participant to receive shares of our common stock or, in the
discretion of the compensation committee, a cash payment,
subject to the attainment of objectives based on the performance
criteria described below. All incentive awards shall be finally
determined exclusively by the compensation committee under the
procedures established by the compensation committee. Incentive
awards shall be nontransferable; provided however, the
compensation committee may permit limited transfers of incentive
awards for the benefit of immediate family members of
participants to help with estate planning concerns.
Performance Shares. The 2005 Plan also allows the grant
of performance share awards, meaning the right to receive our
common stock, cash or a combination of our common stock and cash
in the future. The participant will be entitled to receive
payment pursuant to the performance shares only upon the
satisfaction of performance objectives and other criteria
prescribed by the compensation committee. The performance
measurement period will be at least three years from the date of
the award; provided, however, that the performance measurement
period shall be at least one year from the date of the award if
the payment is contingent on the attainment of the objectives
stated with respect to performance criteria listed below. To the
extent the performance shares are earned, our payment obligation
may be settled in cash, by shares of our common stock or a
combination of the two.
Stock Appreciation Rights. Stock appreciation rights may
be awarded under the 2005 Plan. Stock appreciation rights
entitle the participant to receive a number of shares of our
common stock or, in the discretion of the compensation
committee, an amount in cash or a combination of shares and
cash, based on the increase in the fair market value of the
shares underlying the stock appreciation right during a stated
period specified by the compensation committee.
Performance Criteria. Section 162(m) of the Internal
Revenue Code limits publicly traded companies to an annual
deduction for federal income tax purposes of $1,000,000 for
compensation paid to each of their chief executive officers and
the four highest compensated executive officers other than the
chief executive officer. However, performance-based compensation
is excluded from this limitation. The 2005 Plan is designed to
permit the compensation committee to grant awards that qualify
as performance-based for purposes of satisfying the conditions
of Section 162(m). Accordingly, the 2005 Plan provides that
no individual may receive awards in any calendar year covering
more than 175,000 shares of our common stock. In addition,
no individual may receive more than $3,000,000 in any calendar
year under an incentive award.
The compensation committee will use one or more of the following
business criteria, on a consolidated basis, and/or with respect
to specified subsidiaries or lending groups (except with respect
to the total stockholder return and earnings per share
criteria), in establishing performance goals for awards (other
than options and stock appreciation rights) that are intended to
qualify as performance-based compensation under
Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code:
|
|
|
|
|
total stockholder return; |
|
|
|
total stockholder return as compared to total return (on a
comparable basis) of a publicly available index such as, but not
limited to, the Standard & Poors 500 Stock Index; |
|
|
|
net income; |
|
|
|
pretax earnings; |
|
|
|
funds from operations; |
|
|
|
earnings before interest expense and taxes; |
|
|
|
earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization; |
101
|
|
|
|
|
operating margin; |
|
|
|
earnings per share; |
|
|
|
return on equity; |
|
|
|
return on capital; |
|
|
|
return on assets; |
|
|
|
return on investment; |
|
|
|
operating earnings; |
|
|
|
working capital; |
|
|
|
ratio of debt to stockholders equity; and |
|
|
|
revenue. |
Adjustments for Stock Dividends and Similar Events. The
compensation committee will make appropriate adjustments in the
number and terms of outstanding awards and the number of shares
of our common stock available for issuance under the 2005 Plan,
including the individual limitations on awards, to reflect
common stock dividends, stock splits, spin-off and other similar
events.
Change in Control. The 2005 Plan provides that the
compensation committee has the discretion to provide that all or
any outstanding options and stock appreciation rights will
become fully exercisable, all or any outstanding stock awards
will become vested and transferable and all or any outstanding
performance shares and incentive awards will be earned if there
is a change in control of our company.
Under the 2005 Plan, a change in control is generally defined to
include (i) the acquisition of at least 50% of our voting
securities by any person; (ii) the transfer of all or
substantially all of our assets; (iii) a merger,
consolidation or statutory share exchange where our stockholders
hold less than 50% of the voting power of the surviving or
resulting entity; (iv) our directors, including subsequent
directors recommended or approved by our directors, cease to
constitute a majority of our board of directors;
(v) stockholder approval of our liquidation or dissolution;
or (vi) our board of directors adopts a resolution to the
effect that, in its judgment, as a consequence of any
transaction or event, a change in control has effectively
occurred.
Amendment or Termination of the Plan. While our board of
directors may terminate or amend the 2005 Plan at any time, no
amendment may adversely impair the rights of participants with
respect to outstanding awards. In addition, an amendment will be
contingent on approval of our stockholders to the extent
required by law, the rules of the New York Stock Exchange or if
the amendment would increase the benefits accruing to
participants under the 2005 Plan, materially increase the
aggregate number of shares of common stock that may be issued
under the 2005 Plan, or materially modify the requirements as to
eligibility for participation in the 2005 Plan.
Unless terminated earlier, the 2005 Plan will terminate in 2015,
but will continue to govern unexpired awards.
401(k) Plan
The existing 401(k) plan of NYMC permits our officers and
employees to participate in this 401(k) plan. For some of our
and NYMCs employees, we may make matching contributions
with respect to a portion of the contributions made by those
employees.
Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider
Participation
Our board of directors has established a compensation committee.
None of our executive officers serve on the compensation or
similar committee of any other entity.
102
Limitation on Liability and Indemnification
Our charter limits, to the maximum extent permitted by Maryland
law, the liability of our directors and officers for money
damages, except for liability resulting from:
|
|
|
|
|
actual receipt of an improper benefit or profit in money,
property or services; or |
|
|
|
a final judgment based upon a finding of active and deliberate
dishonesty by the director or officer that was material to the
cause of action adjudicated. |
Our charter authorizes us, and our bylaws obligate us, to the
maximum extent permitted by Maryland law to indemnify, and to
pay or reimburse reasonable expenses in advance of final
disposition of a final proceeding to, any of our present or
former directors or officers or any individual who, while a
director or officer and at our request, serves or has served
another corporation, real estate investment trust, partnership,
joint venture, trust, employee benefit plan or any other
enterprise as a director, officer, partner or trustee. The
indemnification covers any claim or liability arising from such
status against the person.
Maryland law requires a corporation (unless its charter provides
otherwise, which our charter does not) to indemnify a director
or officer who has been successful in the defense of any
proceeding to which he is made a party by reason of his service
in that capacity.
Maryland law permits us to indemnify our present and former
directors and officers against judgments, penalties, fines,
settlements and reasonable expenses actually incurred by them in
any proceeding to which they may be made a party by reason of
their service in those or other capacities unless it is
established that:
|
|
|
|
|
the act or omission of the director or officer was material to
the matter giving rise to the proceeding and (i) was
committed in bad faith or (ii) was the result of active and
deliberate dishonesty; |
|
|
|
the director or officer actually received an improper personal
benefit of money, property or services; or |
|
|
|
in the case of a criminal proceeding, the director or officer
had reasonable cause to believe that the act or omission was
unlawful. |
However, Maryland law prohibits us from indemnifying our present
and former directors and officers for an adverse judgment in a
suit by or in the right of the corporation or if the director or
officer was adjudged to be liable for an improper personal
benefit unless in either case a court orders indemnification and
then only for expenses. Maryland law requires us, as a condition
to advancing expenses in certain circumstances, to obtain:
|
|
|
|
|
a written affirmation by the director or officer of his or her
good faith belief that he or she has met the standard of conduct
necessary for indemnification; and |
|
|
|
a written undertaking by him or her, or on his or her behalf, to
repay the amount paid or reimbursed by us if it is ultimately
determined that the standard of conduct is not met. |
In addition, indemnification could reduce the legal remedies
available to us and our stockholders against our officers and
directors. The Securities and Exchange Commission takes the
position that indemnification against liabilities arising under
the Securities Act of 1933 is against public policy and
unenforceable. Indemnification of our directors and officers
will not be allowed for liabilities arising from or out of a
violation of state or federal securities laws, unless one or
more of the following conditions are met:
|
|
|
|
|
there has been a adjudication on the merits in favor of the
director or officer on each count involving alleged securities
law violations; |
|
|
|
all claims against the director or officer have been dismissed
with prejudice on the merits by a court of competent
jurisdiction; or |
|
|
|
a court of competent jurisdiction approves a settlement of the
claims against the director or officer and finds that
indemnification with respect to the settlement and the related
costs should be allowed after being advised of the position of
the Securities and Exchange Commission and of the published
position of any state securities regulatory authority in which
the securities were offered as to indemnification for violations
of securities laws. |
103
PRINCIPAL STOCKHOLDERS
The following table sets forth certain information, as of
April 15, 2005, regarding shares of our common stock owned
of record or known to us to be owned beneficially by each
director and nominee for director, each executive officer and
all directors and executive officers as a group. At
April 15, 2005, there were 17,797,375 shares of our
common stock outstanding. Except as set forth in the footnotes
to the table below, each of the stockholders identified in the
table has sole voting and investment power over the common stock
beneficially owned by that person. The address for each
individual listed below is: c/o New York Mortgage Trust,
Inc., 1301 Avenue of the Americas, New York, New York 10019.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of Shares | |
|
|
|
|
of Common Stock | |
|
|
Beneficial Owners |
|
Beneficially Owned(1) | |
|
Percent of Class | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Steven B. Schnall(2)
|
|
|
2,226,627 |
|
|
|
12.4 |
% |
Joseph V. Fierro(3)
|
|
|
954,326 |
|
|
|
5.3 |
% |
David A. Akre(4)
|
|
|
95,683 |
|
|
|
* |
|
Raymond A. Redlingshafer, Jr.(5)
|
|
|
95,683 |
|
|
|
* |
|
Michael I. Wirth(6)
|
|
|
74,530 |
|
|
|
* |
|
Steven R. Mumma(7)
|
|
|
33,447 |
|
|
|
* |
|
Jerome F. Sherman(8)
|
|
|
7,500 |
|
|
|
* |
|
David R. Bock(8)
|
|
|
2,500 |
|
|
|
* |
|
Alan L. Hainey(8)
|
|
|
2,500 |
|
|
|
* |
|
Steven G. Norcutt(8)
|
|
|
5,000 |
|
|
|
* |
|
Mary Dwyer Pembroke(8)
|
|
|
4,900 |
|
|
|
* |
|
Thomas W. White(8)
|
|
|
3,000 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All directors and executive officers as a group (12 persons)
|
|
|
3,505,696 |
|
|
|
19.70 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
All shares not outstanding but which may be acquired by the
stockholder within 60 days by the exercise of any stock
option or any other right are deemed to be outstanding for the
purposes of calculating beneficial ownership and computing the
percentage of the class beneficially owned by the stockholder,
but not by any other stockholder. |
|
(2) |
Includes 1,855,000 shares issued to Mr. Schnall and
his affiliate in connection with our acquisition of the
outstanding membership interests in NYMC. Includes
71,352 shares of restricted stock granted to
Mr. Schnall upon completion of our IPO. Includes 123,550
fully vested stock options granted to Mr. Schnall upon
completion of our IPO with an exercise price equal to our IPO
price of $9.00. Includes 36,624 shares of our common stock
held in escrow to satisfy any indemnification claims we may have
against the contributors of the NYMC membership interests under
the contribution agreement during the escrow period for losses
we incur as a result of defaults on any residential mortgage
loans originated by NYMC and closed prior to June 29, 2004.
The escrow period for these shares will run through
December 31, 2005 or the date upon which all
indemnification claims have been satisfied, whichever occurs
first. Includes 140,000 shares of our common stock
purchased by Mr. Schnall in our IPO through a directed
share program. |
|
(3) |
Includes 795,000 shares issued to Mr. Fierro and his
affiliate in connection with our acquisition of the outstanding
membership interests in NYMC. Includes 30,580 shares of
restricted stock granted to Mr. Fierro upon completion of
our IPO. Includes 52,950 fully vested stock options granted to
Mr. Fierro upon completion of our IPO having an exercise
price equal to our IPO price of $9.00. Includes
15,696 shares of our common stock held in escrow to satisfy
any indemnification claims we may have against the contributors
of the NYMC membership interests under the contribution
agreement during the escrow period for losses we incur as a
result of defaults on any residential mortgage loans originated
by NYMC and closed prior to June 29, 2004. The escrow
period for these shares will run through |
104
|
|
|
December 31, 2005 or the date upon which all
indemnification claims have been satisfied, whichever occurs
first. Includes 60,000 shares of our common stock purchased
by Mr. Fierro in our IPO through a directed share program. |
|
|
(4) |
Includes 95,583 shares of restricted stock granted to
Mr. Akre upon completion of our IPO. |
|
(5) |
Includes 95,583 shares of restricted stock granted to
Mr. Redlingshafer upon completion of our IPO. |
|
(6) |
Includes 74,430 shares of restricted stock granted to
Mr. Wirth upon completion of our IPO. |
|
(7) |
Includes 29,597 shares of restricted stock granted to
Mr. Mumma upon completion of our IPO. |
|
(8) |
Includes 2,500 shares of restricted stock granted to each
of Mr. Bock, Mr. Hainey, Mr. Norcutt,
Ms. Pembroke, Mr. Sherman and Mr. White,
respectively, upon completion of our IPO. |
SHARE OWNERSHIP BY CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS
To our knowledge, based upon information available to us,
beneficial owners of more than 5% of our common stock as of
December 31, 2004, are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount and Nature of | |
|
|
Name and Address of Beneficial Owner |
|
Beneficial Ownership | |
|
Percent of Class | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Franklin Mutual Advisors LLC(1)
|
|
|
2,129,850 |
|
|
|
11.7 |
% |
|
51 John F. Kennedy Parkway
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short Hills, NY 07078
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Eubel Brady & Suttman Asset Management, Inc.(2)
|
|
|
1,478,370 |
|
|
|
7.9 |
% |
|
7777 Washington Village Drive
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Suite 210
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dayton, OH 45459
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FMR Corp.(3)
|
|
|
1,410,300 |
|
|
|
7.8 |
% |
|
82 Devonshire Street
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Boston, MA 02109
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DePrince, Pace & Zollo, Inc.(4)
|
|
|
1,394,500 |
|
|
|
7.7 |
% |
|
201 S. Orange Ave., Suite 850
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orlando, FL 32801
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Friedman, Billings, Ramsey Group, Inc.(5)
|
|
|
1,392,300 |
|
|
|
7.7 |
% |
|
1001 19th Street North, 18th Floor,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Arlington, VA 22209
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NWQ Investment Management Company, LLC(6)
|
|
|
1,089,952 |
|
|
|
6.0 |
% |
|
2049 Century Park East, 4th Floor
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Los Angeles, CA 90067
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
Information based on a Schedule 13G filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on February 14, 2005 by
Franklin Mutual Advisors, LLC. The Schedule 13G/ A
indicates that the reporting entity is an investment adviser
with sole voting power over 2,129,850 shares of our common
stock and sole dispositive power over 2,129,850 shares of
our common stock. |
|
(2) |
Information based on a Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on
February 14, 2005 by Eubel Brady & Suttman Asset
Management, Inc. The Schedule 13G indicates that the reporting
entity is an investment advisor with shared voting power over
1,478,370 shares of our common stock and shared dispositive
power over 1,478,370 shares of our common stock. |
|
(3) |
Information based on a Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on
February 14, 2005, by FMR Corp. The Schedule 13G
indicates that the reporting entity is a parent holding company
with sole power to dispose or to direct the disposition of
1,410,300 shares of our common stock. |
|
(4) |
Information based on a Schedule 13G filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on January 10, 2005 by
DePrince, Race & Zollo, Inc. The Schedule 13G
indicates that the reporting entity has sole voting power over
1,394,500 shares of our common stock and sole dispositive
power over 1,394,500 shares of our common stock. |
105
|
|
(5) |
Shares held by various investment funds over which Friedman,
Billings, Ramsey Group, Inc., the parent company of Friedman,
Billings, Ramsey & Co., Inc., exercises shares investment
and voting power through wholly-owned indirect subsidiaries. |
|
(6) |
Information based on a Schedule 13G/ A filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on February 14, 2005 by
NWQ Investment Management Company, LLC. The Schedule 13G/ A
indicates that the reporting entity has sole voting power over
965,850 shares of our common stock and sole dispositive
power over 1,089,952 shares of our common stock. |
106
CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
Acquisition of Membership Interests in The New York Mortgage
Company, LLC
In connection with our IPO, we entered into a contribution
agreement, dated as of December 22, 2003, with
Steven B. Schnall, our Chairman and Co-Chief Executive
Officer, and Joseph V. Fierro, the Chief Operating Officer
of NYMC, as amended and restated on March 25, 2004, as
further amended and restated on April 29, 2004 (the
Contribution Agreement), pursuant to which we
acquired from Messrs. Schnall and Fierro and their
affiliates all of the outstanding membership interests in NYMC.
The terms of this contribution agreement were not negotiated
between the parties on an arms-length basis. We issued a total
of 2,750,000 shares of our common stock for these
interests, seventy percent of which, or 1,925,000 shares,
were issued to Mr. Schnall and his affiliate and thirty
percent of which, or 825,000 shares, were issued to
Mr. Fierro and his affiliate.
In addition, 70,000 of the shares of common stock issued to
Mr. Schnall and his affiliate and 30,000 of the shares of
common stock issued to Mr. Fierro and his affiliate as
consideration for their interests in NYMC were placed in escrow
through December 31, 2004 (escrowed shares) for
the purpose of satisfying any indemnification claims we may have
against the contributors of the NYMC membership interests under
the Contribution Agreement during the escrow period for losses
we incurred as a result of defaults on residential mortgage
loans originated by NYMC and closed prior to completion of our
IPO. On December 31, 2004, Messrs. Schnall and Fierro
forfeited 33,376 and 14,304 escrowed shares, respectively, to
satisfy certain indemnification claims known as of
December 31, 2004 and agreed to extend the escrow period
for the balance of the escrowed shares to December 31, 2005
or the date upon which all indemnification claims have been
satisfied, whichever occurs first.
Finally, we agreed under the Contribution Agreement to indemnify
each of Messrs. Schnall and Fierro and their affiliates
against all liabilities, losses, damages, costs, claims,
obligations and expenses (including reasonable attorneys
fees) that either or both of them may suffer or incur by reason
of (i) any breach of our representations, warranties,
covenants or agreements contained in the Contribution Agreement,
(ii) any act or cause of action occurring or accruing on or
after the closing date of our IPO (the closing date)
and arising from our ownership or operation of NYMC on or after
the closing date and (iii) any personal guarantee of
NYMCs obligations by either or both of
Messrs. Schnall or Fierro in existence prior to or as of
the closing date of our acquisition of NYMC of or relating to
any liability or obligation of NYMC. In addition, we agreed in
the Contribution Agreement to take all actions necessary to
cause all of these guarantees by Messrs. Schnall and Fierro
to be terminated or released in full without any continuing
liability or obligation on their part as soon as reasonably
practicable following our acquisition of NYMC. As of
April 15, 2005, no claims under this indemnification
provision have arisen.
Notes Payable to Steven B. Schnall and Joseph V.
Fierro
NYMC issued notes in the amounts of $11,432,550 and $2,274,352
to Messrs. Schnall and Fierro, respectively, on
August 31, 2003, as amended and restated on
December 23, 2003, as further amended and restated on
February 26, 2004, and as further amended and restated on
May 26, 2004, and that were due on June 30, 2005
bearing interest at 3% per annum, as distributions equal to
NYMCs paid-in equity and retained earnings as of
August 31, 2003.
We entered into an agreement with NYMC and Messrs. Schnall
and Fierro dated December 23, 2003, as amended and restated
on April 29, 2004 to cause NYMC to repay these promissory
notes following completion of our IPO. These notes were repaid
in full to Messrs. Schnall and Fierro on June 30, 2004.
Distributions to Steven B. Schnall and Joseph V. Fierro
Immediately prior to completion of our IPO, NYMC made a cash
distribution of approximately $2,409,000 in the aggregate to
Messrs. Schnall and Fierro and their affiliates, who
together comprised all the former members of NYMC. The
distribution was based on the estimated paid-in equity and
retained earnings of NYMC as of June 29, 2004, the closing
date of our IPO ($409,323 of retained earnings as of
March 31,
107
2004 plus an estimate of $2,000,000 for NYMCs earnings
through June 29, 2004). The cash distribution was made to
Messrs. Schnall and Fierro pro rata in accordance with
their respective former ownership interests in NYMC. The
subsequent earnings and elimination of distributions and
unrealized gains and losses attributable to NYMC for the period
prior to June 29, 2004 equated to a distribution
overpayment of $1,309,448. Messrs. Schnall and Fierro
immediately reimbursed the Company for the entire amount of the
distribution overpayment upon the finalization of the
overpayment calculation in July 2004.
Investment by Steven B. Schnall and Joseph V. Fierro in
Centurion Abstract, LLC
Steven B. Schnall owns a 48% membership interest and
Joseph V. Fierro owns a 12% membership interest in
Centurion Abstract, LLC (Centurion), which
provides title insurance brokerage services for certain title
insurance providers. From time to time, NYMC refers its mortgage
loan borrowers to Centurion for assistance in obtaining title
insurance in connection with their mortgage loans, although the
borrowers have no obligation to utilize Centurions
services. When NYMCs borrowers elect to utilize
Centurions services to obtain title insurance, Centurion
collects various fees and a portion of the title insurance
premium paid by the borrower for its title insurance. Centurion
received $648,326 in fees and other amounts from NYMC borrowers
for the year ended December 31, 2004.
108
SHARES ELIGIBLE FOR FUTURE SALE
Upon the completion of this offering, we will have
23,797,375 shares of common stock outstanding. Of the
shares of our common stock that will be outstanding, the
6,000,000 shares sold in this offering will be freely
transferable without restriction or further registration under
the Securities Act, except for any shares held by our
affiliates, as that term is defined by Rule 144
under the Securities Act.
In addition, each of our executive officers and each of our
directors who beneficially owns our common stock as of the date
of this prospectus have agreed under written lock-up
agreements not to sell any common stock for 90 days after
the date of this prospectus without the prior written consent of
Friedman, Billings, Ramsey & Co., Inc. See
Underwriting beginning on page 144.
Rule 144
In general, under Rule 144 as currently in effect,
beginning 90 days after this offering, a person who owns
shares that were purchased from us or any affiliate of ours at
least one year previously, including a person who may be deemed
an affiliate, is entitled to sell within any three-month period
a number of shares that does not exceed the greater of:
|
|
|
|
|
1% of our then outstanding common stock, or approximately
237,974 shares following the completion of this offering
and our acquisition of NYMC; or |
|
|
|
the average weekly trading volume of our common stock of the New
York Stock Exchange during the four calendar weeks preceding the
date on which notice of the sale is filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission. |
Sales under Rule 144 are also subject to manner of sale
provisions, notice requirements and the availability of current
public information about us.
Any person who is not deemed to have been our affiliate at any
time during the 90 days preceding a sale, and who owns
shares within the definition of restricted
securities under Rule 144 that were purchased from us
or any of our affiliates at least two years previously, would be
entitled to sell those shares under Rule 144(k) without
regard to the volume limitations, manner of sale provisions,
public information requirements or notice requirements.
Rule 701
Rule 701 may be relied upon with respect to the resale of
securities originally purchased from us by our employees,
directors or officers prior to this offering. In addition, the
Securities and Exchange Commission has indicated that
Rule 701 will apply to the typical stock options granted by
an issuer before it becomes a public company, along with the
shares acquired upon exercise of those options, including
exercises after the date of this offering. Securities issued in
reliance on Rule 701 are restricted securities and, subject
to the lock-up agreements described above, beginning
90 days after the date of this prospectus, may be sold by:
|
|
|
|
|
persons other than affiliates, in ordinary brokerage
transactions; and |
|
|
|
affiliates under Rule 144 without compliance with the
one-year holding requirement. |
Sale of Restricted Shares
As a result of Rules 144 and 701, beginning 90 days
after the closing of this offering, we expect that:
|
|
|
|
|
no shares of common stock will be eligible for resale without
restriction under Rule 144(k) other than the shares sold in
this offering to non-affiliates; |
|
|
|
upon the expiration of the lock-up agreements 90 days after
this offering, no additional shares of common stock will become
eligible for sale under Rule 144. |
We have agreed not to offer, sell or otherwise dispose of any
common stock or any securities convertible into or exercisable
or exchangeable for common stock or any rights to acquire common
stock for a period of 90 days after the date of this
prospectus, without the prior written consent of Friedman,
Billings, Ramsey & Co. Inc., subject to specific limited
exceptions. See Underwriting beginning on
page 138.
109
DESCRIPTION OF CAPITAL STOCK
The following summary description of our capital stock does
not purport to be complete and is subject to and qualified in
its entirety by reference to Maryland law, our charter and our
bylaws, copies of which were filed as exhibits to our IPO
registration statement. See Where You Can Find More
Information on page 141.
General
Our charter provides that we may issue up to
400,000,000 shares of common stock, par value
$0.01 per share, and 200,000,000 shares of preferred
stock, par value $0.01 per share. Following completion of
this offering, 23,797,375 shares of common stock will be
outstanding. No shares of preferred stock will be issued and
outstanding. Under Maryland law, our stockholders are not
generally liable for our debts or obligations. Our charter
authorizes our board of directors to amend our charter to
increase or decrease the aggregate number of shares of capital
stock or the number of shares of stock of any class or series
that we have the authority to issue, without your approval.
Voting Rights of Common Stock
Subject to the provisions of our charter regarding restrictions
on the transfer and ownership of shares of common stock, each
outstanding share of common stock entitles the holder to one
vote on all matters submitted to a vote of stockholders,
including the election of directors, and, except as provided
with respect to any other class or series of shares of our
stock, the holders of our common stock possess the exclusive
voting power. There is no cumulative voting in the election of
directors, which means that the holders of a majority of the
outstanding shares of common stock, voting as a single class,
can elect all of the directors then standing for election. Under
Maryland law, a Maryland corporation generally cannot dissolve,
amend its charter, merge, sell all or substantially all of its
assets, or engage in a share exchange or engage in similar
transactions outside the ordinary course of business unless
approved by the affirmative vote of stockholders holding at
least two-thirds of the shares entitled to vote on the matter,
unless a lesser percentage (but not less than a majority of all
the votes entitled to be cast on the matter) is set forth in the
corporations charter. Our charter provides for approval by
a majority of all the votes entitled to be cast on the matter
for the matters described in the preceding sentence (except for
certain charter amendments).
Dividends, Liquidation and Other Rights
All shares of common stock offered by this prospectus are duly
authorized, fully paid and nonassessable. Holders of our shares
of common stock are entitled to receive dividends when
authorized by our board of directors and declared by us out of
assets legally available for the payment of dividends. They also
are entitled to share ratably in our assets legally available
for distribution to our stockholders in the event of our
liquidation, dissolution or winding up, after payment of or
adequate provision for all of our known debts and liabilities.
These rights are subject to the preferential rights of any other
class or series of our stock and to the provisions of our
charter regarding restrictions on transfer and ownership of our
stock.
Holders of our shares of common stock have no appraisal,
preference, conversion, exchange, sinking fund or redemption
rights and have no preemptive rights to subscribe for any of our
securities. Subject to the restrictions on transfer of capital
stock contained in our charter and to the ability of the board
of directors to create shares of common stock with differing
voting rights, all shares of common stock have equal dividend,
liquidation and other rights.
Our charter also authorizes our board of directors to classify
and reclassify any unissued shares of our common stock and
preferred stock into any other classes or series of classes of
our stock, as discussed below, to establish the number of shares
in each class or series and to set the terms, preferences,
conversion and other rights, voting powers, restrictions,
limitations as to dividends or other distributions,
qualifications and terms or conditions of redemption for each
such class or series. Thus, our board of directors could
authorize the issuance of shares of preferred stock with terms
and conditions that could have the effect of delaying, deferring
or preventing a transaction or a change of control that might
involve a premium price for you or otherwise be in your best
interest.
110
Preferred Stock
Our charter authorizes our board of directors to reclassify any
unissued shares of common stock into preferred stock, to
classify any unissued shares of preferred stock and to
reclassify any previously classified but unissued shares of any
series of preferred stock previously authorized by our board of
directors. Prior to issuance of shares of each class or series
of preferred stock, our board of directors is required by
Maryland law and our charter to fix, subject to our charter
restrictions on transfer and ownership, the terms, preferences,
conversion or other rights, voting powers, restrictions,
limitations as to dividends or other distributions,
qualifications and terms or conditions of redemption for each
class or series. Thus, our board could authorize the issuance of
shares of preferred stock with terms and conditions that could
have the effect of delaying, deferring or preventing a
transaction or a change of control that might involve a premium
price for you or otherwise be in your best interest. As of the
completion of this offering, no shares of our preferred stock
will be outstanding and we have no present plans to issue any
preferred stock.
Power to Issue Additional Shares of Common Stock and
Preferred Stock
We believe that the power of our board of directors to issue
additional authorized but unissued shares of our common stock or
preferred stock and to classify or reclassify unissued shares of
our common stock or preferred stock and thereafter to cause us
to issue such classified or reclassified shares of stock
provides us with increased flexibility in structuring possible
future financings and acquisitions and in meeting other needs
which might arise. The additional classes or series, as well as
our common stock, are available for issuance without further
action by our stockholders, unless stockholder action is
required by applicable law or the rules of any stock exchange or
automated quotation system on which our securities may be listed
or traded. Although our board of directors has no intention at
the present time of doing so, it could authorize us to issue a
class or series that could, depending upon the terms of such
class or series, delay, defer or prevent a transaction or a
change in control of us that might involve a premium price for
holders of our common stock or otherwise be in your best
interest.
Restrictions on Ownership and Transfer
In order to qualify as a REIT under the Internal Revenue Code,
our shares of stock must be beneficially owned by 100 or more
persons during at least 335 days of a taxable year of
12 months or during a proportionate part of a shorter
taxable year (other than our first year as a REIT). Also, no
more than 50% of the value of our outstanding shares of capital
stock may be owned, directly or constructively, by five or fewer
individuals (as defined in the Internal Revenue Code to include
certain entities) during the last half of any taxable year
(other than our first year as a REIT). In addition, if certain
disqualified organizations hold our stock, although
the law on the matter is unclear, a tax might be imposed on us
if a portion of our assets is treated as a taxable mortgage
pool. In addition, a tax will be imposed on us if certain
disqualified organizations hold our stock and we hold a residual
interest in a real estate mortgage investment conduit, or REMIC.
To help us to qualify as a REIT, our charter, subject to certain
exceptions, contains restrictions on the number of shares of our
capital stock that a person may own and prohibits certain
entities from owning our stock. Our charter provides that
generally no person may own, or be deemed to own by virtue of
the attribution provisions of the Internal Revenue Code, either
(i) more than 9.4% in value of the aggregate of our
outstanding shares of capital stock or (ii) more than 9.4%
in value or in number of shares, whichever is more restrictive,
of our outstanding common stock. Our charter provides that
Steven B. Schnall, our chairman of the board of directors and
co-chief executive officer, may own up to 12.0% in value or in
number of our common stock and 12.0% in value of the aggregate
of our outstanding shares of capital stock. Our board of
directors is permitted under our charter to waive these
ownership limits on a case by case basis so long as the waiver
will not cause us to fail to comply with applicable REIT
ownership requirements under the Code. From time to time, our
board of directors has granted waivers to investors, including a
temporary waiver granted to Mr. Schnall to allow him to own
up to 12.7% of our common stock through June 30, 2005. In
addition, our charter provides that if Mr. Schnalls
ownership of our common stock falls to or below 9.9% in value
and in number of the outstanding shares of such stock, then, at
all times after such decrease in Mr. Schnalls
ownership, the ownership limit for Mr. Schnall will
decrease to 9.9% and the ownership limit for all other
111
shareholders will increase to 9.9%. Our charter prohibits the
following disqualified organizations from owning our
stock: the United States; any state or political subdivision of
the United States; any foreign government; any international
organization; any agency or instrumentality of any of the
foregoing; any other tax-exempt organization, other than a
farmers cooperative described in Section 521 of the
Internal Revenue Code, that is exempt from both income taxation
and from taxation under the unrelated business taxable income
provisions of the Internal Revenue Code; and any rural
electrical or telephone cooperative.
Our charter also prohibits any person from (a) beneficially
or constructively owning shares of our capital stock that would
result in our being closely held under
Section 856(h) of the Internal Revenue Code, and
(b) transferring shares of our capital stock if such
transfer would result in our capital stock being beneficially
owned by fewer than 100 persons. Any person who acquires or
attempts or intends to acquire beneficial ownership of shares of
our capital stock that will or may violate any of the foregoing
restrictions on transferability and ownership will be required
to give notice immediately to us and provide us with such other
information as we may request in order to determine the effect
of such transfer on our status as a REIT. The foregoing
restrictions on transferability and ownership will not apply if
our board of directors determines that it is no longer in our
best interests to attempt to qualify, or to continue to qualify,
as a REIT.
Our board of directors, in its sole discretion, may exempt a
person from the above ownership limits and any of the
restrictions described in the first sentence of the paragraph
directly above. However, the board of directors may not grant an
exemption to any person unless the board of directors obtains
such representations, covenants and undertakings as the board of
directors may deem appropriate in order to determine that
granting the exemption would not result in our losing our status
as a REIT. As a condition of granting the exemption, our board
of directors may require a ruling from the Internal Revenue
Service or an opinion of counsel, in either case in form and
substance satisfactory to the board of directors, in its sole
discretion, in order to determine or ensure our status as a REIT.
If any transfer of our shares of stock occurs which, if
effective, would result in any person beneficially or
constructively owning shares of stock in excess or in violation
of the above transfer or ownership limitations, known as a
prohibited owner, then that number of shares of stock, the
beneficial or constructive ownership of which otherwise would
cause such person to violate the transfer or ownership
limitations (rounded up to the nearest whole share), will be
automatically transferred to a charitable trust for the
exclusive benefit of a charitable beneficiary, and the
prohibited owner will not acquire any rights in such shares.
This automatic transfer will be considered effective as of the
close of business on the business day before the violative
transfer. If the transfer to the charitable trust would not be
effective for any reason to prevent the violation of the above
transfer or ownership limitations, then the transfer of that
number of shares of stock that otherwise would cause any person
to violate the above limitations will be void. Shares of stock
held in the charitable trust will continue to constitute issued
and outstanding shares of our stock. The prohibited owner will
not benefit economically from ownership of any shares of stock
held in the charitable trust, will have no rights to dividends
or other distributions and will not possess any rights to vote
or other rights attributable to the shares of stock held in the
charitable trust. The trustee of the charitable trust will be
designated by us and must be unaffiliated with us or any
prohibited owner and will have all voting rights and rights to
dividends or other distributions with respect to shares of stock
held in the charitable trust, and these rights will be exercised
for the exclusive benefit of the trusts charitable
beneficiary. Any dividend or other distribution paid before our
discovery that shares of stock have been transferred to the
trustee will be paid by the recipient of such dividend or
distribution to the trustee upon demand, and any dividend or
other distribution authorized but unpaid will be paid when due
to the trustee. Any dividend or distribution so paid to the
trustee will be held in trust for the trusts charitable
beneficiary. Subject to Maryland law, effective as of the date
that such shares of stock have been transferred to the trustee,
the trustee, in its sole discretion, will have the authority to:
|
|
|
|
|
rescind as void any vote cast by a prohibited owner prior to our
discovery that such shares have been transferred to the trustee;
and |
|
|
|
recast such vote in accordance with the desires of the trustee
acting for the benefit of the trusts beneficiary. |
112
However, if we have already taken irreversible corporate action,
then the trustee will not have the authority to rescind and
recast such vote.
Within 20 days of receiving notice from us that shares of
stock have been transferred to the charitable trust, and unless
we buy the shares first as described below, the trustee will
sell the shares of stock held in the charitable trust to a
person, designated by the trustee, whose ownership of the shares
will not violate the ownership limitations in our charter. Upon
the sale, the interest of the charitable beneficiary in the
shares sold will terminate and the trustee will distribute the
net proceeds of the sale to the prohibited owner and to the
charitable beneficiary. The prohibited owner will receive the
lesser of:
|
|
|
|
|
the price paid by the prohibited owner for the shares or, if the
prohibited owner did not give value for the shares in connection
with the event causing the shares to be held in the charitable
trust (for example, in the case of a gift or devise), the market
price of the shares on the day of the event causing the shares
to be held in the charitable trust; and |
|
|
|
the price per share received by the trustee from the sale or
other disposition of the shares held in the charitable trust
(less any commission and other expenses of a sale). |
The trustee may reduce the amount payable to the prohibited
owner by the amount of dividends and distributions paid to the
prohibited owner that are owed by the prohibited owner to the
trustee. Any net sale proceeds in excess of the amount payable
to the prohibited owner will be paid immediately to the
charitable beneficiary. If, before our discovery that shares of
stock have been transferred to the charitable trust, such shares
are sold by a prohibited owner, then:
|
|
|
|
|
such shares will be deemed to have been sold on behalf of the
charitable trust; and |
|
|
|
to the extent that the prohibited owner received an amount for
such shares that exceeds the amount that the prohibited owner
was entitled to receive as described above, the excess must be
paid to the trustee upon demand. |
In addition, shares of stock held in the charitable trust will
be deemed to have been offered for sale to us, or our designee,
at a price per share equal to the lesser of:
|
|
|
|
|
the price per share in the transaction that resulted in such
transfer to the charitable trust (or, in the case of a gift or
devise, the market price at the time of the gift or
devise); and |
|
|
|
the market price on the date we, or our designee, accept such
offer. |
We may reduce the amount payable to the prohibited owner by the
amount of dividends and distributions paid to the prohibited
owner that are owed by the prohibited owner to the trustee. We
may pay the amount of such reduction to the trustee for the
benefit of the charitable beneficiary. We will have the right to
accept the offer until the trustee has sold the shares of stock
held in the charitable trust. Upon such a sale to us, the
interest of the charitable beneficiary in the shares sold will
terminate and the trustee will distribute the net proceeds of
the sale to the prohibited owner and any dividends or other
distributions held by the trustee will be paid to the charitable
beneficiary.
All certificates representing shares of our capital stock will
bear a legend referring to the restrictions described above.
Every holder of more than 5% (or such lower percentage as
required by the Internal Revenue Code or the regulations
promulgated thereunder) in value of our outstanding capital
stock, including shares of common stock, within 30 days
after the end of each taxable year, will be required to give
written notice to us stating the name and address of such
holder, the number of shares of each class and series of shares
of our stock that the holder beneficially owns and a description
of the manner in which the shares are held. Each holder shall
provide to us such additional information as we may request in
order to determine the effect, if any, of the holders
beneficial ownership on our status as a REIT and to ensure
compliance with our ownership limitations. In addition, each
stockholder shall upon demand be required to provide to us such
information as
113
we may request, in good faith, in order to determine our status
as a REIT and to comply with the requirements of any taxing
authority or governmental authority or to determine such
compliance.
Our ownership limitations could delay, defer or prevent a
transaction or a change in control of us that might involve a
premium price for holders of our common stock or might otherwise
be in the best interest of our stockholders.
Transfer Agent and Registrar
The transfer agent and registrar for our shares of common stock
is American Stock Transfer & Trust Company.
114
CERTAIN PROVISIONS OF MARYLAND LAW
AND OUR CHARTER AND BYLAWS
The following description of certain provisions of Maryland
law and of our charter and bylaws is only a summary. For a
complete description, we refer you to the applicable Maryland
law, our charter and our bylaws. Copies of our charter and
bylaws were filed as exhibits to our IPO registration
statement.
Number of Directors; Vacancies
Our charter and bylaws provide that the number of our directors
shall be nine and may only be increased or decreased by a vote
of a majority of the members of our board of directors. Our
charter provides that any vacancy, including a vacancy created
by an increase in the number of directors, may be filled only by
a majority of the remaining directors, even if the remaining
directors do not constitute a quorum.
Removal of Directors
Our charter provides that a director may be removed with or
without cause upon the affirmative vote of at least two-thirds
of the votes entitled to be cast in the election of directors.
Absent removal of all of our directors, this provision, when
coupled with the provision in our bylaws authorizing our board
of directors to fill vacant directorships, may preclude
stockholders from removing incumbent directors and filling the
vacancies created by such removal with their own nominees.
Amendment to the Charter
Generally, our charter may be amended only by the affirmative
vote of the holders of not less than a majority of all of the
votes entitled to be cast on the matter. However, provisions in
our charter related to (1) removal of directors,
(2) blank check stock and (3) the restrictions on
transfer and ownership may only be amended by the affirmative
vote of the holders of not less than two-thirds of all of the
votes entitled to be cast on the matter.
Dissolution
Our dissolution must be approved by the affirmative vote of the
holders of not less than a majority of all of the votes entitled
to be cast on the matter.
Business Combinations
Maryland law prohibits business combinations between
us and an interested stockholder or an affiliate of an
interested stockholder for five years after the most recent date
on which the interested stockholder becomes an interested
stockholder. These business combinations include a merger,
consolidation, share exchange, or, in circumstances specified in
the statute, an asset transfer or issuance or reclassification
of equity securities. Maryland law defines an interested
stockholder as:
|
|
|
|
|
any person or entity who beneficially owns 10% or more of the
voting power of our stock; or |
|
|
|
an affiliate or associate of ours who, at any time within the
two year period prior to the date in question, was the
beneficial owner of 10% or more of the voting power of our then
outstanding voting stock. |
A person is not an interested stockholder if our board of
directors approves in advance the transaction by which the
person otherwise would have become an interested stockholder.
However, in approving a transaction, our board of directors may
provide that its approval is subject to compliance, at or after
the time of approval, with any terms and conditions determined
by our board of directors.
After the five-year prohibition, any business combination
between us and an interested stockholder generally must be
recommended by our board of directors and approved by the
affirmative vote of at least:
|
|
|
|
|
80% of the votes entitled to be cast by holders of our then
outstanding shares of voting stock; and |
115
|
|
|
|
|
two-thirds of the votes entitled to be cast by holders of our
voting stock other than stock held by the interested stockholder
with whom or with whose affiliate the business combination is to
be effected or stock held by an affiliate or associate of the
interested stockholder. |
These super-majority vote requirements do not apply if our
common stockholders receive a minimum price, as defined under
Maryland law, for their shares in the form of cash or other
consideration in the same form as previously paid by the
interested stockholder for its stock.
The statute permits various exemptions from its provisions,
including business combinations that are approved by our board
of directors before the time that the interested stockholder
becomes an interested stockholder.
As permitted by the Maryland General Corporation Law, our board
of directors has adopted a resolution that the business
combination provisions of the Maryland General Corporation Law
will not apply to us. However, our board of directors may repeal
or modify this resolution at any time in the future, in which
case the applicable provisions of this statute will become
applicable to business combinations between us and interested
stockholders.
Control Share Acquisitions
Maryland law provides that control shares of a
Maryland corporation acquired in a control share
acquisition have no voting rights unless approved by a
vote of two-thirds of the votes entitled to be cast on the
matter. Shares owned by the acquiror or by officers or directors
who are our employees are excluded from the shares entitled to
vote on the matter. Control shares are voting shares
that, if aggregated with all other shares currently owned by the
acquiring person, or in respect of which the acquiring person is
able to exercise or direct the exercise of voting power (except
solely by virtue of a revocable proxy), would entitle the
acquiring person to exercise voting power in electing directors
within one of the following ranges of voting power:
|
|
|
|
|
one-tenth or more but less than one-third; |
|
|
|
one-third or more but less than a majority; or |
|
|
|
a majority or more of all voting power. |
Control shares do not include shares the acquiring person is
then entitled to vote as a result of having previously obtained
stockholder approval. A control share acquisition
means the acquisition of control shares, subject to certain
exceptions.
A person who has made or proposes to make a control share
acquisition may compel our board of directors to call a special
meeting of stockholders to be held within 50 days of demand
to consider the voting rights of the shares. The right to compel
the calling of a special meeting is subject to the satisfaction
of certain conditions, including an undertaking to pay the
expenses of the meeting. If no request for a meeting is made, we
may present the question at any stockholders meeting.
If voting rights are not approved at the stockholders meeting or
if the acquiring person does not deliver the statement required
by Maryland law, then, subject to certain conditions and
limitations, we may redeem any or all of the control shares,
except those for which voting rights have previously been
approved, for fair value. Fair value is determined, without
regard to the absence of voting rights for the control shares,
as of the date of the last control share acquisition by the
acquiror or of any meeting of stockholders at which the voting
rights of the shares were considered and not approved. If voting
rights for control shares are approved at a stockholders meeting
and the acquiror becomes entitled to vote a majority of the
shares entitled to vote, all other stockholders may exercise
appraisal rights. The fair value of the shares for purposes of
these appraisal rights may not be less than the highest price
per share paid by the acquiror in the control share acquisition.
The control share acquisition statute does not apply to shares
acquired in a merger, consolidation or share exchange if we are
a party to the transaction, nor does it apply to acquisitions
approved by or exempted by our charter or bylaws.
116
Our bylaws contain a provision exempting any and all
acquisitions of our shares of stock from the control shares
provisions of Maryland law. Nothing prevents our board of
directors from amending or repealing this provision in the
future.
Limitation of Liability and Indemnification
Our charter limits, to the maximum extent permitted by Maryland
law, the liability of our directors and officers for money
damages, except for liability resulting from:
|
|
|
|
|
actual receipt of an improper benefit or profit in money,
property or services; or |
|
|
|
a final judgment based upon a finding of active and deliberate
dishonesty by the director or officer that was material to the
cause of action adjudicated. |
Our charter authorizes us, and our bylaws obligate us, to the
maximum extent permitted by Maryland law to indemnify, and to
pay or reimburse reasonable expenses in advance of final
disposition of a final proceeding to, any of our present or
former directors or officers or any individual who, while a
director or officer and at our request, serves or has served
another corporation, real estate investment trust, partnership,
joint venture, trust, employee benefit plan or any other
enterprise as a director, officer, partner or trustee. The
indemnification covers any claim or liability arising from such
status against the person.
Maryland law requires a corporation (unless its charter provides
otherwise, which our charter does not) to indemnify a director
or officer who has been successful in the defense of any
proceeding to which he is made, or threatened to be made, a
party by reason of his service in that capacity.
Maryland law permits us to indemnify our present and former
directors and officers against judgments, penalties, fines,
settlements and reasonable expenses actually incurred by them in
any proceeding to which they may be made, or threatened to be
made, a party by reason of their service in those or other
capacities unless it is established that:
|
|
|
|
|
the act or omission of the director or officer was material to
the matter giving rise to the proceeding and (i) was
committed in bad faith or (ii) was the result of active and
deliberate dishonesty; |
|
|
|
the director or officer actually received an improper personal
benefit of money, property or services; or |
|
|
|
in the case of a criminal proceeding, the director or officer
had reasonable cause to believe that the act or omission was
unlawful. |
However, Maryland law prohibits us from indemnifying our present
and former directors and officers for an adverse judgment in a
suit by or in the right of the corporation or if the director or
officer was adjudged to be liable for an improper personal
benefit unless in either case a court orders indemnification and
then only for expenses. Maryland law requires us, as a condition
to advancing expenses in certain circumstances, to obtain:
|
|
|
|
|
a written affirmation by the director or officer of his or her
good faith belief that he or she has met the standard of conduct
necessary for indemnification; and |
|
|
|
a written undertaking by him or her, or on his or her behalf, to
repay the amount paid or reimbursed by us if it is ultimately
determined that the standard of conduct is not met. |
Meetings of Stockholders
Special meetings of stockholders may be called by our directors,
by the chairman of our board of directors, our co-chief
executive officers, or our president. Stockholder-requested
special meetings shall be called by our secretary upon the
written request of the holders of common stock entitled to cast
not less than a majority of all votes entitled to be cast at
such meeting. Only matters set forth in the notice of the
special meeting may be considered and acted upon at such a
meeting.
117
Advance Notice of Director Nominations and New Business
Our bylaws provide that, with respect to an annual meeting of
stockholders, nominations of individuals for election to our
board of directors and the proposal of business to be considered
by stockholders at the annual meeting may be made only:
|
|
|
|
|
pursuant to our notice of the meeting; |
|
|
|
by or at the direction of our board of directors; or |
|
|
|
by a stockholder who was a stockholder of record both at the
time of the giving of notice by the stockholder and at the time
of the meeting, who is entitled to vote at the meeting and has
complied with the advance notice procedures set forth in our
bylaws. |
With respect to special meetings of stockholders, only the
business specified in our notice of meeting may be brought
before the meeting of stockholders and nominations of
individuals for election to our board of directors may be made
only:
|
|
|
|
|
pursuant to our notice of the meeting; |
|
|
|
by our board of directors; or |
|
|
|
provided that our board of directors has determined that
directors shall be elected at such meeting, by a stockholder who
was a stockholder of record both at the time of the provision of
notice and at the time of the meeting who is entitled to vote at
the meeting and has complied with the advance notice provisions
set forth in our bylaws. |
The purpose of requiring stockholders to give advance notice of
nominations and other proposals is to afford our board of
directors the opportunity to consider the qualifications of the
proposed nominees or the advisability of the other proposals
and, to the extent considered necessary by our board of
directors, to inform stockholders and make recommendations
regarding the nominations or other proposals. The advance notice
procedures also permit a more orderly procedure for conducting
our stockholder meetings. Although our bylaws do not give our
board of directors the power to disapprove timely stockholder
nominations and proposals, they may have the effect of
precluding a contest for the election of directors or proposals
for other action if the proper procedures are not followed, and
of discouraging or deterring a third party from conducting a
solicitation of proxies to elect its own slate of directors to
our board of directors or to approve its own proposal.
Possible Anti-Takeover Effect of Certain Provisions of
Maryland Law and of Our Charter and Bylaws
Subtitle 8 of Title 3 of the Maryland General
Corporation Law permits a Maryland corporation with a class of
equity securities registered under the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934, as amended, and at least three independent directors to
elect to be subject, by provision in its charter or bylaws or a
resolution of its board of directors and notwithstanding any
contrary provision in its charter or bylaws, to any or all of
five of the following provisions:
|
|
|
|
|
a classified board of directors, meaning that the directors may
be divided into up to three classes with only one class standing
for election in any year, |
|
|
|
a director may be removed only by a two-thirds vote of the
stockholders, |
|
|
|
a requirement that the number of directors be fixed only by vote
of the directors, |
|
|
|
a requirement that a vacancy on the board of directors be filled
only by the remaining directors and for the new director to
serve the remainder of the full term of the class of directors
in which the vacancy occurred, and |
|
|
|
a requirement that stockholder-called special meetings of
stockholders may only be called by stockholders holding a
majority of the outstanding stock. |
118
Through provisions in our charter and bylaws, we already
(a) require a two-thirds vote for the removal of any
director from our board, (b) vest in our board of directors
the exclusive power to fix the number of directorships,
(c) require vacancies on the board of directors to be
filled only by the remaining directors and for the remainder of
the full term in which the vacancy occurred and (d) require
that stockholder-called special meetings of stockholders may
only be called by stockholders holding a majority of our
outstanding stock. Further, although we do not currently have a
classified board of directors, Subtitle 8 permits our board
of directors, without stockholder approval and regardless of
what is provided in our charter or bylaws, to implement takeover
defenses that we may not yet have, such as dividing the members
of our board of directors into up to three classes with only one
class standing for election in any year.
The business combination and control share acquisition
provisions of Maryland law (if the applicable provisions in our
bylaws are rescinded), the provisions of our charter on the
removal of directors, the ownership limitations required to
protect our REIT status, the board of directors ability to
increase the aggregate number of shares of capital stock and
issue shares of preferred stock with differing terms and
conditions, and the advance notice provisions of our bylaws
could have the effect of delaying, deterring or preventing a
transaction or a change in control that might involve a premium
price for you or might otherwise be in your best interest.
119
FEDERAL INCOME TAX CONSEQUENCES OF OUR STATUS AS A REIT
This section summarizes the federal income tax issues that
you, as a stockholder, may consider relevant. Because this
section is a summary, it does not address all aspects of
taxation that may be relevant to particular stockholders in
light of their personal investment or tax circumstances, or to
certain types of stockholders that are subject to special
treatment under the federal income tax laws, such as insurance
companies, tax-exempt organizations (except to the extent
discussed in Taxation of Tax-Exempt
Stockholders below), financial institutions or
broker-dealers, and non-U.S. individuals and foreign
corporation.
The statements in this section and the opinion of
Hunton & Williams LLP are based on the current federal
income tax laws governing qualification as a REIT. We cannot
assure you that new laws, interpretations of law, or court
decisions, any of which may take effect retroactively, will not
cause any statement in this section to be inaccurate.
We urge you to consult your own tax advisor regarding the
specific tax consequences to you of the purchase, ownership and
sale of our common stock and of our election to be taxed as a
REIT. Specifically, you should consult your own tax advisor
regarding the federal, state, local, foreign, and other tax
consequences of such purchase, ownership, sale and election, and
regarding potential changes in applicable tax laws.
Taxation of Our Company
We intend to elect to be taxed as a REIT under the federal
income tax laws effective for our short taxable year ended on
December 31, 2004, upon filing our federal income tax
return for that year. We requested an extension to file our
federal income tax return. We believe that we are organized and
we operate in such a manner so as to qualify for taxation as a
REIT under the federal income tax laws, and we intend to
continue to operate in such a manner, but no assurance can be
given that we will operate in a manner so as to remain qualified
as a REIT. This section discusses the laws governing the federal
income tax treatment of a REIT and its stockholders. These laws
are highly technical and complex.
In connection with this offering of our common stock,
Hunton & Williams LLP is rendering an opinion that,
provided we timely elect to be taxed as a REIT on our first
federal income tax return, we will qualify to be taxed as a REIT
under the federal income tax laws for our taxable year ended
December 31, 2004, and our current and proposed method of
operation will enable us to continue to meet the requirements
for qualification and taxation as a REIT under the federal
income tax laws for our taxable year ending December 31,
2005 and in the future. Investors should be aware that
Hunton & Williams LLPs opinion is based upon
customary assumptions, is conditioned upon certain
representations made by us as to factual matters, including
representations regarding the nature of our assets and the
conduct of our business, and is not binding upon the Internal
Revenue Service, or IRS, or any court. In addition,
Hunton & Williams LLPs opinion is based on
existing federal income tax law governing qualification as a
REIT, which is subject to change either prospectively or
retroactively. Moreover, our qualification and taxation as a
REIT depend upon our ability to meet on a continuing basis,
through actual annual operating results, certain qualification
tests set forth in the federal tax laws. Those qualification
tests involve the percentage of income that we earn from
specified sources, the percentage of our assets that falls
within specified categories, the diversity of our stock
ownership, and the percentage of our earnings that we
distribute. Hunton & Williams LLP will not review our
compliance with those tests on a continuing basis. Accordingly,
no assurance can be given that our actual results of operations
for any particular taxable year will satisfy such requirements.
For a discussion of the tax consequences of our failure to
qualify as a REIT, see Failure to
Qualify.
As a REIT, we generally will not be subject to federal income
tax on the REIT taxable income that we distribute to our
stockholders, but taxable income generated by NYMC, our taxable
REIT subsidiary, will be subject to regular corporate income
tax. The benefit of that tax treatment is that it avoids the
double
120
taxation, or taxation at both the corporate and
stockholder levels, that generally applies to distributions by a
corporation to its stockholders. However, we will be subject to
federal tax in the following circumstances:
|
|
|
|
|
We will pay federal income tax on taxable income, including net
capital gain, that we do not distribute to stockholders during,
or within a specified time period after, the calendar year in
which the income is earned. |
|
|
|
We may be subject to the alternative minimum tax on
any items of tax preference that we do not distribute or
allocate to stockholders. |
|
|
|
We will pay income tax at the highest corporate rate on: |
|
|
|
|
|
net income from the sale or other disposition of property
acquired through foreclosure, or foreclosure property, that we
hold primarily for sale to customers in the ordinary course of
business, and |
|
|
|
other non-qualifying income from foreclosure property. |
|
|
|
|
|
We will pay a 100% tax on net income earned by the REIT from
sales or other dispositions of property, other than foreclosure
property, that we hold primarily for sale to customers in the
ordinary course of business. |
|
|
|
If we fail to satisfy the 75% gross income test or the 95% gross
income test, as described below under
Requirements for Qualification
Gross Income Tests, and nonetheless continue to qualify as
a REIT because we meet other requirements, we will pay a 100%
tax on: |
|
|
|
|
|
the greater of (i) the amount by which we fail the 75%
gross income test or (ii) the amount by which 90% (or 95%
beginning with our 2005 taxable year) of our gross income
exceeds the amount of our income qualifying under the 95% gross
income test, multiplied by |
|
|
|
a fraction intended to reflect our profitability. |
|
|
|
|
|
In the event of a more than de minimis failure of any of the
asset tests occurring in a taxable year after our 2004 taxable
year, as described below under Requirement for
QualificationAsset Tests, as long as the failure was
due to reasonable cause and not to willful neglect, we file a
description of the assets that caused such failure with the IRS,
and we dispose of the assets or otherwise comply with the asset
tests within six months after the last day of the quarter in
which we identify such failure, we will pay a tax equal to the
greater of $50,000 or 35% of the net income from the
nonqualifying assets during the period in which we failed to
satisfy any of the asset tests. |
|
|
|
In the event of a failure to satisfy one or more requirements
for REIT qualification occurring in a taxable year after our
2004 taxable year, other than the gross income tests and the
asset tests, as long as such failure was due to reasonable cause
and not to willful neglect, we will be required to pay a penalty
of $50,000 for each such failure. |
|
|
|
If we fail to distribute during a calendar year at least the sum
of: |
|
|
|
|
|
85% of our REIT ordinary income for the year, |
|
|
|
95% of our REIT capital gain net income for the year, and |
|
|
|
any undistributed taxable income from earlier periods, |
|
|
|
we will pay a 4% nondeductible excise tax on the excess of the
required distribution over the amount we actually distributed. |
|
|
|
|
|
We may elect to retain and pay income tax on our net long-term
capital gain. In that case, a U.S. stockholder would be
taxed on its proportionate share of our undistributed long-term
capital gain (to the extent that we make a timely designation of
such gain to the stockholder) and would receive a credit or
refund for its proportionate share of the tax we paid. |
|
|
|
We will be subject to a 100% excise tax on transactions between
us and a taxable REIT subsidiary that are not conducted on an
arms-length basis. |
121
|
|
|
|
|
If we acquire any asset from a C corporation, or a
corporation that generally is subject to full corporate-level
tax, in a merger or other transaction in which we acquire a
basis in the asset that is determined by reference either to the
C corporations basis in the asset or to another asset, we
will pay tax at the highest regular corporate rate applicable if
we recognize gain on the sale or disposition of the asset during
the 10-year period after we acquire the asset. The amount of
gain on which we will pay tax is the lesser of: |
|
|
|
|
|
the amount of gain that we recognize at the time of the sale or
disposition, and |
|
|
|
the amount of gain that we would have recognized if we had sold
the asset at the time we acquired it. |
|
|
|
|
|
If we own a residual interest in a REMIC, we will be taxable at
the highest corporate rate on the portion of any excess
inclusion income that we derive from the REMIC residual
interests equal to the percentage of our stock that is held by
disqualified organizations. Although the law is
unclear, similar rules may apply if we own an equity interest in
a taxable mortgage pool. To the extent that we own a REMIC
residual interest or a taxable mortgage pool through a taxable
REIT subsidiary, we will not be subject to this tax. For a
discussion of excess inclusion income, see
Requirements for Qualification Taxable
Mortgage Pools. A disqualified organization
includes: |
|
|
|
|
|
the United States; |
|
|
|
any state or political subdivision of the United States; |
|
|
|
any foreign government; |
|
|
|
any international organization; |
|
|
|
any agency or instrumentality of any of the foregoing; |
|
|
|
any other tax-exempt organization, other than a farmers
cooperative described in section 521 of the Code, that is
exempt both from income taxation and from taxation under the
unrelated business taxable income provisions of the
Code; and |
|
|
|
any rural electrical or telephone cooperative. |
For this reason, our charter prohibits disqualified
organizations from owning our stock.
Requirements for Qualification
|
|
|
Organizational Requirements |
A REIT is a corporation, trust, or association that meets each
of the following requirements:
|
|
|
(1) It is managed by one or more trustees or directors. |
|
|
(2) Its beneficial ownership is evidenced by transferable
shares, or by transferable certificates of beneficial interest. |
|
|
(3) It would be taxable as a domestic corporation, but for
the REIT provisions of the federal income tax laws. |
|
|
(4) It is neither a financial institution nor an insurance
company subject to special provisions of the federal income tax
laws. |
|
|
(5) At least 100 persons are beneficial owners of its
shares or ownership certificates. |
|
|
(6) Not more than 50% in value of its outstanding shares or
ownership certificates is owned, directly or indirectly, by five
or fewer individuals, which the federal income tax laws define
to include certain entities, during the last half of any taxable
year. |
|
|
(7) It elects to be a REIT, or has made such election for a
previous taxable year, and satisfies all relevant filing and
other administrative requirements established by the IRS that
must be met to elect and maintain REIT status. |
|
|
(8) It meets certain other qualification tests, described
below, regarding the nature of its income and assets. |
122
We must meet requirements 1 through 4 during our entire taxable
year and must meet requirement 5 during at least 335 days
of a taxable year of 12 months, or during a proportionate
part of a taxable year of less than 12 months. Requirements
5 and 6 will apply to us beginning with our 2005 taxable year.
If we comply with all the requirements for ascertaining the
ownership of our outstanding stock in a taxable year and have no
reason to know that we violated requirement 6, we will be
deemed to have satisfied requirement 6 for that taxable year.
For purposes of determining share ownership under
requirement 6, an individual generally includes
a supplemental unemployment compensation benefits plan, a
private foundation, or a portion of a trust permanently set
aside or used exclusively for charitable purposes. An
individual, however, generally does not include a
trust that is a qualified employee pension or profit sharing
trust under the federal income tax laws, and beneficiaries of
such a trust will be treated as holding our stock in proportion
to their actuarial interests in the trust for purposes of
requirement 6.
We believe that we are issuing sufficient common stock with
sufficient diversity of ownership to satisfy requirements 5 and
6. In addition, our charter restricts the ownership and transfer
of our stock so that we should continue to satisfy these
requirements. The provisions of our charter restricting the
ownership and transfer of the common stock are described in
Description of Capital Stock Restrictions on
Ownership and Transfer.
Qualified REIT Subsidiaries. A corporation that is a
qualified REIT subsidiary is not treated as a
corporation separate from its parent REIT. All assets,
liabilities, and items of income, deduction, and credit of a
qualified REIT subsidiary are treated as assets,
liabilities, and items of income, deduction, and credit of the
REIT. A qualified REIT subsidiary is a corporation
all of the capital stock of which is owned by the REIT and that
has not elected to be a taxable REIT subsidiary. Thus, in
applying the requirements described herein, any qualified
REIT subsidiary that we own will be ignored, and all
assets, liabilities, and items of income, deduction, and credit
of such subsidiary will be treated as our assets, liabilities,
and items of income, deduction, and credit.
Other Disregarded Entities and Partnerships. An
unincorporated domestic entity, such as a partnership or limited
liability company, that has a single owner, generally is not
treated as an entity separate from its parent for federal income
tax purposes. An unincorporated domestic entity with two or more
owners generally is treated as a partnership for federal income
tax purposes. In the case of a REIT that is a partner in a
partnership that has other partners, the REIT is treated as
owning its proportionate share of the assets of the partnership
and as earning its allocable share of the gross income of the
partnership for purposes of the applicable REIT qualification
tests. For purposes of the 10% value test (described in
Asset Tests), our proportionate share is
based on our proportionate interest in the equity interests and
certain debt securities issued by the partnership. For all of
the other asset and income tests, our proportionate share is
based on our proportionate interest in the capital interests in
the partnership. Thus, our proportionate share of the assets,
liabilities, and items of income of any partnership, joint
venture, or limited liability company that is treated as a
partnership for federal income tax purposes in which we acquire
an interest, directly or indirectly, will be treated as our
assets and gross income for purposes of applying the various
REIT qualification requirements.
Taxable REIT Subsidiaries. A REIT is permitted to own up
to 100% of the stock of one or more taxable REIT
subsidiaries, or TRSs. A TRS is a fully taxable
corporation that may earn income that would not be qualifying
income if earned directly by the parent REIT. The subsidiary and
the REIT must jointly elect to treat the subsidiary as a TRS. A
corporation of which a TRS directly or indirectly owns more than
35% of the voting power or value of the stock will automatically
be treated as a TRS. Overall, no more than 20% of the value of a
REITs assets may consist of stock or securities of one or
more TRSs.
A TRS will pay income tax at regular corporate rates on any
income that it earns. In addition, the TRS rules limit the
deductibility of interest paid or accrued by a TRS to its parent
REIT to assure that the TRS is subject to an appropriate level
of corporate taxation. Further, the rules impose a 100% excise
tax on transactions between a TRS and its parent REIT or the
REITs tenants that are not conducted on an
arms-length basis. We have elected to treat NYMC as a TRS.
NYMC will be subject to corporate income tax on its taxable
income, which will be its net income from loan originations and
sales. See Taxable REIT Subsidiaries.
123
Taxable Mortgage Pools. An entity, or a portion of an
entity, may be classified as a taxable mortgage pool under the
Code if:
|
|
|
|
|
substantially all of its assets consist of debt obligations or
interests in debt obligations; |
|
|
|
more than 50% of those debt obligations are real estate mortgage
loans or interests in real estate mortgage loans as of specified
testing dates; |
|
|
|
the entity has issued debt obligations that have two or more
maturities; and |
|
|
|
the payments required to be made by the entity on its debt
obligations bear a relationship to the payments to
be received by the entity on the debt obligations that it holds
as assets. |
Under U.S. Treasury regulations, if less than 80% of the
assets of an entity (or a portion of an entity) consist of debt
obligations, these debt obligations are considered not to
comprise substantially all of its assets, and
therefore the entity would not be treated as a taxable mortgage
pool.
We may make investments or enter into financing and
securitization transactions that give rise to our being
considered to be, or to own an interest in, one or more taxable
mortgage pools. Where an entity, or a portion of an entity, is
classified as a taxable mortgage pool, it is generally treated
as a taxable corporation for federal income tax purposes.
However, special rules apply to a REIT, a portion of a REIT, or
a qualified REIT subsidiary that is a taxable mortgage pool. The
portion of the REITs assets, held directly or through a
qualified REIT subsidiary that qualifies as a taxable mortgage
pool is treated as a qualified REIT subsidiary that is not
subject to corporate income tax, and the taxable mortgage pool
classification does not affect the tax status of the REIT.
Rather, the consequences of the taxable mortgage pool
classification would generally, except as described below, be
limited to the REITs stockholders. The Treasury Department
has yet to issue regulations governing the tax treatment of the
stockholders of a REIT that owns an interest in a taxable
mortgage pool.
A portion of our income from a taxable mortgage pool
arrangement, which might be non-cash accrued income, or
phantom taxable income, could be treated as
excess inclusion income. Excess inclusion income is
an amount, with respect to any calendar quarter, equal to the
excess, if any, of (i) income allocable to the holder of a
REMIC residual interest or taxable mortgage pool interest over
(ii) the sum of an amount for each day in the calendar
quarter equal to the product of (a) the adjusted issue
price at the beginning of the quarter multiplied by
(b) 120% of the long-term federal rate (determined on the
basis of compounding at the close of each calendar quarter and
properly adjusted for the length of such quarter). This non-cash
or phantom income would be subject to the
distribution requirements that apply to us and could therefore
adversely affect our liquidity. See
Distribution Requirements.
Our excess inclusion income would be allocated among our
stockholders. A stockholders share of excess inclusion
income (i) would not be allowed to be offset by any net
operating losses otherwise available to the stockholder,
(ii) would be subject to tax as unrelated business taxable
income in the hands of most types of stockholders that are
otherwise generally exempt from federal income tax, and
(iii) would result in the application of U.S. federal
income tax withholding at the maximum rate (30%), without
reduction for any otherwise applicable income tax treaty, to the
extent allocable to most types of foreign stockholders. See
Taxation of Taxable
U.S. Stockholders, Taxation of
Tax-Exempt Stockholders, and Taxation of
Non-U.S. Stockholders. The manner in which excess
inclusion income would be allocated among shares of different
classes of our stock or how such income is to be reported to
stockholders is not clear under current law. Tax-exempt
investors, foreign investors, and taxpayers with net operating
losses should carefully consider the tax consequences described
above and are urged to consult their tax advisors in connection
with their decision to invest in our common stock.
If we own less than 100% of the ownership interests in a
subsidiary that is a taxable mortgage pool, the foregoing rules
would not apply. Rather, the subsidiary would be treated as a
corporation for federal income tax purposes, and would
potentially be subject to corporate income tax. In addition,
this characterization would alter our REIT income and asset test
calculations and could adversely affect our compliance with
those requirements. We currently do not have, and currently do
not intend to form, any subsidiary in which we own
124
some, but less than all, of the ownership interests that are or
will become taxable mortgage pools, and we intend to monitor the
structure of any taxable mortgage pools in which we have an
interest to ensure that they will not adversely affect our
status as a REIT.
We must satisfy two gross income tests annually to maintain our
qualification as a REIT. First, at least 75% of our gross income
for each taxable year must consist of defined types of income
that we derive, directly or indirectly, from investments
relating to real property or mortgage loans on real property or
qualified temporary investment income. Qualifying income for
purposes of the 75% gross income test generally includes:
|
|
|
|
|
rents from real property; |
|
|
|
interest on debt secured by a mortgage on real property, or on
interests in real property; |
|
|
|
dividends or other distributions on, and gain from the sale of,
shares in other REITs; |
|
|
|
gain from the sale of real estate assets; |
|
|
|
amounts, such as commitment fees, received in consideration for
entering into an agreement to make a loan secured by real
property, unless such amounts are determined by income and
profits; |
|
|
|
income derived from a REMIC in proportion to the real estate
assets held by the REMIC, unless at least 95% of the
REMICs assets are real estate assets, in which case all of
the income derived from the REMIC; and |
|
|
|
income derived from the temporary investment of new capital that
is attributable to the issuance of our stock or a public
offering of our debt with a maturity date of at least five years
and that we receive during the one-year period beginning on the
date on which we received such new capital. |
Second, in general, at least 95% of our gross income for each
taxable year must consist of income that is qualifying income
for purposes of the 75% gross income test, other types of
interest and dividends, gain from the sale or disposition of
stock or securities, income from certain hedging instruments
(during our 2004 taxable year) or any combination of these.
Gross income from servicing and loan origination fees is not
qualifying income for purposes of either gross income test. In
addition, gross income from our sale of property that we hold
primarily for sale to customers in the ordinary course of
business is excluded from both the numerator and the denominator
in both income tests. In addition, beginning with our 2005
taxable year, income and gain from hedging
transactions, as defined in Hedging
Transactions, that we enter into to hedge indebtedness
incurred or to be incurred to acquire or carry real estate
assets and that are clearly and timely identified as such will
be excluded from both the numerator and the denominator for
purposes of the 95% gross income test (but not the 75% gross
income test). We will monitor the amount of our non-qualifying
income and we will manage our portfolio to comply at all times
with the gross income tests. The following paragraphs discuss
the specific application of the gross income tests to us.
Interest. The term interest, as defined for
purposes of both gross income tests, generally excludes any
amount that is based in whole or in part on the income or
profits of any person. However, interest generally includes the
following:
|
|
|
|
|
an amount that is based on a fixed percentage or percentages of
receipts or sales; and |
|
|
|
an amount that is based on the income or profits of a debtor, as
long as the debtor derives substantially all of its income from
the real property securing the debt from leasing substantially
all of its interest in the property, and only to the extent that
the amounts received by the debtor would be qualifying
rents from real property if received directly by a
REIT. |
If a loan contains a provision that entitles a REIT to a
percentage of the borrowers gain upon the sale of the real
property securing the loan or a percentage of the appreciation
in the propertys value as of a specific
125
date, income attributable to that loan provision will be treated
as gain from the sale of the property securing the loan, which
generally is qualifying income for purposes of both gross income
tests.
Interest on debt secured by a mortgage on real property or on
interests in real property, including, for this purpose,
discount points, prepayment penalties, loan assumption fees, and
late payment charges that are not compensation for services,
generally is qualifying income for purposes of the 75% gross
income test. However, if the highest principal amount of a loan
outstanding during a taxable year exceeds the fair market value
of the real property securing the loan as of the date the REIT
agreed to originate or acquire the loan, a portion of the
interest income from such loan will not be qualifying income for
purposes of the 75% gross income test, but will be qualifying
income for purposes of the 95% gross income test. The portion of
the interest income that will not be qualifying income for
purposes of the 75% gross income test will be equal to the
portion of the principal amount of the loan that is not secured
by real property that is, the amount by which the
loan exceeds the value of the real estate that is security for
the loan.
The interest, original issue discount, and market discount
income that we receive from our mortgage loans and
mortgage-backed securities generally will be qualifying income
for purposes of both gross income tests. However, as discussed
above, if the fair market value of the real estate securing any
of our loans is less than the principal amount of the loan, a
portion of the income from that loan will be qualifying income
for purposes of the 95% gross income test but not the 75% gross
income test.
Fee Income. We may receive various fees in connection
with the mortgage loans. The fees will be qualifying income for
purposes of both the 75% and 95% income tests if they are
received in consideration for entering into an agreement to make
a loan secured by real property, and the fees are not determined
by income or profits. Therefore, commitment fees will generally
be qualifying income for purposes of the income tests. Other
fees, such as fees received for servicing loans for third
parties and origination fees, are not qualifying income for
purposes of either income test. NYMC will conduct servicing and
origination functions that generate fee income that is not
qualifying income. The income earned by NYMC from these services
will not be included for purposes of our income tests.
Dividends. Our share of any dividends received from any
corporation (including NYMC and any other TRS, but excluding any
REIT) in which we own an equity interest will qualify for
purposes of the 95% gross income test but not for purposes of
the 75% gross income test. Our share of any dividends received
from any other REIT in which we own an equity interest will be
qualifying income for purposes of both gross income tests.
Rents from Real Property. We do not hold and do not
intend to acquire any real property with the proceeds of this
offering, but we may acquire real property or an interest
therein in the future. To the extent that we acquire real
property or an interest therein, rents we receive will qualify
as rents from real property in satisfying the gross
income requirements for a REIT described above only if the
following conditions are met:
|
|
|
|
|
First, the amount of rent must not be based in whole or in part
on the income or profits of any person. However, an amount
received or accrued generally will not be excluded from rents
from real property solely by reason of being based on fixed
percentages of receipts or sales. |
|
|
|
Second, rents we receive from a related party tenant
will not qualify as rents from real property in satisfying the
gross income tests unless the tenant is a TRS, at least 90% of
the property is leased to unrelated tenants and the rent paid by
the TRS is substantially comparable to the rent paid by the
unrelated tenants for comparable space and the rent is not
attributable to a modification of a lease with a controlled TRS
(i.e., a TRS in which we own directly or indirectly more than
50% of the voting power or value of the stock). A tenant is a
related party tenant if the REIT, or an actual or constructive
owner of 10% or more of the REIT, actually or constructively
owns 10% or more of the tenant. |
|
|
|
Third, if rent attributable to personal property, leased in
connection with a lease of real property, is greater than 15% of
the total rent received under the lease, then the portion of
rent attributable to the personal property will not qualify as
rents from real property. |
126
|
|
|
|
|
Fourth, we generally must not operate or manage our real
property or furnish or render services to our tenants, other
than through an independent contractor who is
adequately compensated and from whom we do not derive revenue.
However, we may provide services directly to tenants if the
services are usually or customarily rendered in
connection with the rental of space for occupancy only and are
not considered to be provided for the tenants convenience.
In addition, we may provide a minimal amount of
non-customary services to the tenants of a property,
other than through an independent contractor, as long as our
income from the services does not exceed 1% of our income from
the related property. Furthermore, we may own up to 100% of the
stock of a TRS, which may provide customary and non-customary
services to tenants without tainting its rental income from the
related properties. |
Hedging Transactions. From time to time, we enter into
hedging transactions with respect to one or more of our assets
or liabilities. Our hedging activities may include entering into
interest rate swaps, caps, and floors, options to purchase these
items, and futures and forward contracts. To the extent that we
enter into an interest rate swap or cap contract, option,
futures contract, forward rate agreement, or any similar
financial instrument during our 2004 taxable year to hedge our
indebtedness incurred or to be incurred to acquire or carry
real estate assets, including mortgage loans, any
periodic income or gain from the disposition of that contract
attributable to the carrying or acquisition of the real estate
assets should be qualifying income for purposes of the 95% gross
income test, but not the 75% gross income test. Beginning with
our 2005 taxable year, income and gain from hedging
transactions will be excluded from gross income for
purposes of the 95% gross income test (but not the 75% gross
income test). For taxable years after our 2004 taxable year, a
hedging transaction includes any transaction entered
into in the normal course of our trade or business primarily to
manage the risk of interest rate, price changes, or currency
fluctuations with respect to borrowings made or to be made, or
ordinary obligations incurred or to be incurred, to acquire or
carry real estate assets. We will be required to clearly
identify any such hedging transaction before the close of the
day on which it was acquired, originated, or entered into. To
the extent that we hedge or for other purposes, or to the extent
that a portion of our mortgage loans is not secured by
real estate assets (as described below under
Asset Tests) or in other situations, the
income from those transactions is not likely to be treated as
qualifying income for purposes of the gross income tests. We
intend to structure any hedging transactions in a manner that
does not jeopardize our status as a REIT.
Prohibited Transactions. A REIT will incur a 100% tax on
the net income derived from any sale or other disposition of
property, other than foreclosure property, that the REIT holds
primarily for sale to customers in the ordinary course of a
trade or business. We believe that none of our assets will be
held primarily for sale to customers and that a sale of any of
our assets will not be in the ordinary course of our business.
Whether a REIT holds an asset primarily for sale to
customers in the ordinary course of a trade or business
depends, however, on the facts and circumstances in effect from
time to time, including those related to a particular asset.
Nevertheless, we will attempt to comply with the terms of
safe-harbor provisions in the federal income tax laws
prescribing when an asset sale will not be characterized as a
prohibited transaction. We cannot assure you, however, that we
can comply with the safe-harbor provisions or that we will avoid
owning property that may be characterized as property that we
hold primarily for sale to customers in the ordinary
course of a trade or business. To the extent necessary to
avoid the prohibited transactions tax, we will conduct sales of
our loans through NYMC or one of our other taxable REIT
subsidiaries.
It is our current intention that our securitizations of our
mortgage loans will not be treated as sales for tax purposes. If
we were to transfer mortgage loans to a REMIC, this transfer
would be treated as a sale for tax purposes and the sale may be
subject to the prohibited transactions tax. As a result, we
intend to securitize our mortgage loans only in non-REMIC
transactions.
Foreclosure Property. We will be subject to tax at the
maximum corporate rate on any income from foreclosure property,
other than income that otherwise would be qualifying income for
purposes of the 75% gross income test, less expenses directly
connected with the production of that income. However, gross
income
127
from foreclosure property will qualify under the 75% and 95%
gross income tests. Foreclosure property is any real property,
including interests in real property, and any personal property
incident to such real property:
|
|
|
|
|
that is acquired by a REIT as the result of the REIT having bid
on such property at foreclosure, or having otherwise reduced
such property to ownership or possession by agreement or process
of law, after there was a default or default was imminent on a
lease of such property or on indebtedness that such property
secured; |
|
|
|
for which the related loan or lease was acquired by the REIT at
a time when the default was not imminent or anticipated; and |
|
|
|
for which the REIT makes a proper election to treat the property
as foreclosure property. |
However, a REIT will not be considered to have foreclosed on a
property where the REIT takes control of the property as a
mortgagee-in-possession and cannot receive any profit or sustain
any loss except as a creditor of the mortgagor. Property
generally ceases to be foreclosure property at the end of the
third taxable year following the taxable year in which the REIT
acquired the property, or longer if an extension is granted by
the Secretary of the Treasury. This grace period terminates and
foreclosure property ceases to be foreclosure property on the
first day:
|
|
|
|
|
on which a lease is entered into for the property that, by its
terms, will give rise to income that does not qualify for
purposes of the 75% gross income test, or any amount is received
or accrued, directly or indirectly, pursuant to a lease entered
into on or after such day that will give rise to income that
does not qualify for purposes of the 75% gross income test; |
|
|
|
on which any construction takes place on the property, other
than completion of a building or any other improvement, where
more than 10% of the construction was completed before default
became imminent; or |
|
|
|
which is more than 90 days after the day on which the REIT
acquired the property and the property is used in a trade or
business which is conducted by the REIT, other than through an
independent contractor from whom the REIT itself does not derive
or receive any income. |
Failure to Satisfy Gross Income Tests. If we fail to
satisfy one or both of the gross income tests for any taxable
year, we nevertheless may qualify as a REIT for that year if we
qualify for relief under certain provisions of the federal
income tax laws. For our 2004 taxable year, those relief
provisions generally will be available if:
|
|
|
|
|
our failure to meet such tests is due to reasonable cause and
not due to willful neglect; |
|
|
|
we attach a schedule of the sources of our income to our tax
return; and |
|
|
|
any incorrect information on the schedule was not due to fraud
with intent to evade tax. |
Beginning with our 2005 taxable year, those relief provisions
are available if:
|
|
|
|
|
our failure to meet those tests is due to reasonable cause and
not to willful neglect, and |
|
|
|
following such failure for any taxable year, a schedule of the
sources of our income is filed with the IRS. |
We cannot predict, however, whether in all circumstances we
would qualify for the relief provisions. In addition, as
discussed above in Taxation of Our
Company, even if the relief provisions apply, we would
incur a 100% tax on the gross income attributable to the greater
of (i) the amount by which we fail the 75% gross income
test or (ii) the amount by which 90% (or 95% beginning with
our 2005 taxable year) of our gross income exceeds the amount of
our income qualifying under the 95% gross income test,
multiplied by a fraction intended to reflect our profitability.
128
To qualify as a REIT, we also must satisfy the following asset
tests at the end of each quarter of each taxable year. First, at
least 75% of the value of our total assets must consist of:
|
|
|
|
|
cash or cash items, including certain receivables; |
|
|
|
government securities; |
|
|
|
interests in real property, including leaseholds and options to
acquire real property and leaseholds; |
|
|
|
interests in mortgage loans secured by real property; |
|
|
|
stock in other REITs; |
|
|
|
investments in stock or debt instruments during the one-year
period following our receipt of new capital that we raise
through equity offerings or public offerings of debt with at
least a five-year term; and |
|
|
|
regular or residual interests in a REMIC. However, if less than
95% of the assets of a REMIC consists of assets that are
qualifying real estate-related assets under the federal income
tax laws, determined as if we held such assets, we will be
treated as holding directly our proportionate share of the
assets of such REMIC. |
Second, of our investments not included in the 75% asset class,
the value of our interest in any one issuers securities
may not exceed 5% of the value of our total assets.
Third, of our investments not included in the 75% asset class,
we may not own more than 10% of the voting power or value of any
one issuers outstanding securities.
Fourth, no more than 20% of the value of our total assets may
consist of the securities of one or more TRSs.
Fifth, no more than 25% of the value of our total assets may
consist of the securities of TRSs and other non-TRS taxable
subsidiaries and other assets that are not qualifying assets for
purposes of the 75% asset test.
For purposes of the second and third asset tests, the term
securities does not include stock in another REIT,
equity or debt securities of a qualified REIT subsidiary or TRS,
mortgage loans that constitute real estate assets, or equity
interests in a partnership. For purposes of the 10% value test,
the term securities does not include:
|
|
|
|
|
Straight debt securities, which is defined as a
written unconditional promise to pay on demand or on a specified
date a sum certain in money if (i) the debt is not
convertible, directly or indirectly, into stock, and
(ii) the interest rate and interest payment dates are not
contingent on profits, the borrowers discretion, or
similar factors. Straight debt securities do not
include any securities issued by a partnership or a corporation
in which we or any controlled TRS (i.e., a TRS in which we own
directly or indirectly more than 50% of the voting power or
value of the stock) hold non-straight debt
securities that have an aggregate value of more than 1% of the
issuers outstanding securities. However, straight
debt securities include debt subject to the following
contingencies: |
|
|
|
|
|
a contingency relating to the time of payment of interest or
principal, as long as either (i) there is no change to the
effective yield of the debt obligation, other than a change to
the annual yield that does not exceed the greater of 0.25% or 5%
of the annual yield, or (ii) neither the aggregate issue
price nor the aggregate face amount of the issuers debt
obligations held by us exceeds $1 million and no more than
12 months of unaccrued interest on the debt obligations can
be required to be prepaid; and |
|
|
|
a contingency relating to the time or amount of payment upon a
default or prepayment of a debt obligation, as long as the
contingency is consistent with customary commercial practice. |
129
|
|
|
|
|
Any loan to an individual or an estate. |
|
|
|
Any section 467 rental agreement, other than an
agreement with a related party tenant. |
|
|
|
Any obligation to pay rents from real property. |
|
|
|
Certain securities issued by governmental entities. |
|
|
|
Any security issued by a REIT. |
|
|
|
Any debt instrument of an entity treated as a partnership for
federal income tax purposes to the extent of our interest as a
partner in the partnership. |
|
|
|
Any debt instrument of an entity treated as a partnership for
federal income tax purposes not described in the preceding
bullet points if at least 75% of the partnerships gross
income, excluding income from prohibited transactions, is
qualifying income for purposes of the 75% gross income test
described above in Requirements for
QualificationGross Income Tests. |
The asset tests described above are based on our gross assets.
For federal income tax purposes, we will be treated as owning
both the loans we hold directly and the loans that we have
securitized through non-REMIC debt securitizations. Although we
will have a partially offsetting obligation with respect to the
securities issued pursuant to the securitizations, these
offsetting obligations will not reduce the gross assets we are
considered to own for purposes of the asset tests.
We believe that all or substantially all of the mortgage loans
and mortgage-backed securities that we own are qualifying assets
for purposes of the 75% asset test. For purposes of these rules,
however, if the outstanding principal balance of a mortgage loan
exceeds the fair market value of the real property securing the
loan, a portion of such loan likely will not be a qualifying
real estate asset under the federal income tax laws. Although
the law on the matter is not entirely clear, it appears that the
non-qualifying portion of that mortgage loan will be equal to
the portion of the loan amount that exceeds the value of the
associated real property that is security for that loan. To the
extent that we own debt securities issued by other REITs or C
corporations that are not secured by a mortgage on real
property, those debt securities will not be qualifying assets
for purposes of the 75% asset test. Instead, we would be subject
to the second, third and fifth asset tests with respect to those
debt securities.
We will monitor the status of our assets for purposes of the
various asset tests and will seek to manage our portfolio to
comply at all times with such tests. There can be no assurance,
however, that we will be successful in this effort. In this
regard, to determine our compliance with these requirements, we
will need to estimate the value of the real estate securing our
mortgage loans at various times. Although we will seek to be
prudent in making these estimates, there can be no assurances
that the IRS might not disagree with these determinations and
assert that a lower value is applicable. If we fail to satisfy
the asset tests at the end of a calendar quarter, we will not
lose our REIT status if:
|
|
|
|
|
we satisfied the asset tests at the end of the preceding
calendar quarter; and |
|
|
|
the discrepancy between the value of our assets and the asset
test requirements arose from changes in the market values of our
assets and was not wholly or partly caused by the acquisition of
one or more non-qualifying assets. |
If we did not satisfy the condition described in the second
item, above, we still could avoid disqualification by
eliminating any discrepancy within 30 days after the close
of the calendar quarter in which it arose.
In the event that, at the end of any calendar quarter beginning
with our 2005 taxable year, we violate the second or third asset
tests described above, we will not lose our REIT status if
(i) the failure is de minimis (up to the lesser of 1% of
our assets or $10 million) and (ii) we dispose of
assets or otherwise comply with the asset tests within six
months after the last day of the quarter in which we identify
such failure. In the event of a more than de minimis failure of
any of the asset tests beginning with our 2004 taxable year, as
long as the failure was due to reasonable cause and not to
willful neglect, we will not lose our REIT status if we
(i) dispose of assets or otherwise comply with the asset
tests within six months after the last day of the quarter in
which we identify such failure (ii) file a description of
the assets that caused such failure with the IRS, and
130
(iii) pay a tax equal to the greater of $50,000 or 35% of
the net income from the nonqualifying assets during the period
in which we failed to satisfy the asset tests.
We currently believe that the loans, securities and other assets
that we hold satisfy the foregoing asset test requirements.
However, no independent appraisals have been or will be obtained
to support our conclusions as to the value of our assets and
securities, or in many cases, the real estate collateral for the
mortgage loans that we hold. Moreover, the values of some assets
may not be susceptible to a precise determination. As a result,
there can be no assurance that the IRS will not contend that our
ownership of securities and other assets violates one or more of
the asset tests applicable to REITs.
|
|
|
Distribution Requirements |
Each taxable year, we must distribute dividends, other than
capital gain dividends and deemed distributions of retained
capital gain, to our stockholders in an aggregate amount at
least equal to:
|
|
|
|
|
90% of our REIT taxable income, computed without
regard to the dividends paid deduction and our net capital gain
or loss, and |
|
|
|
90% of our after-tax net income, if any, from foreclosure
property, minus |
|
|
|
|
|
the sum of certain items of non-cash income. |
We must pay such distributions in the taxable year to which they
relate, or in the following taxable year if we declare the
distribution before we timely file our federal income tax return
for the year and pay the distribution on or before the first
regular dividend payment date after such declaration.
We will pay federal income tax on taxable income, including net
capital gain, that we do not distribute to stockholders.
Furthermore, if we fail to distribute during a calendar year, or
by the end of January following the calendar year in the case of
distributions with declaration and record dates falling in the
last three months of the calendar year, at least the sum of:
|
|
|
|
|
85% of our REIT ordinary income for such year, |
|
|
|
95% of our REIT capital gain income for such year, and |
|
|
|
any undistributed taxable income from prior periods, |
we will incur a 4% nondeductible excise tax on the excess of
such required distribution over the amounts we actually
distribute. We may elect to retain and pay income tax on the net
long-term capital gain we receive in a taxable year. See
Taxation of Taxable
U.S. Stockholders. If we so elect, we will be treated
as having distributed any such retained amount for purposes of
the 4% nondeductible excise tax described above. We intend to
continue to make timely distributions sufficient to satisfy the
annual distribution requirements and to avoid corporate income
tax and the 4% nondeductible excise tax.
It is possible that, from time to time, we may experience timing
differences between the actual receipt of income and actual
payment of deductible expenses and the inclusion of that income
and deduction of such expenses in arriving at our REIT taxable
income. Possible examples of those timing differences include
the following:
|
|
|
|
|
Because we may deduct capital losses only to the extent of our
capital gains, we may have taxable income that exceeds our
economic income. |
|
|
|
We will recognize taxable income in advance of the related cash
flow if any of our mortgage loans or mortgage-backed securities
are deemed to have original issue discount. We generally must
accrue original issue discount based on a constant yield method
that takes into account projected prepayments but that defers
taking into account credit losses until they are actually
incurred. |
|
|
|
We may recognize taxable market discount income when we receive
the proceeds from the disposition of, or principal payments on,
loans that have a stated redemption price at maturity that is
greater than |
131
|
|
|
|
|
our tax basis in those loans, although such proceeds often will
be used to make non-deductible principal payments on related
borrowings. |
|
|
|
We may recognize taxable income without receiving a
corresponding cash distribution if we foreclose on or make a
significant modification to a loan, to the extent that the fair
market value of the underlying property or the principal amount
of the modified loan, as applicable, exceeds our basis in the
original loan. |
|
|
|
We may recognize phantom taxable income from any residual
interests in REMICs or retained ownership interests in mortgage
loans subject to collateralized mortgage obligation debt. |
Although several types of non-cash income are excluded in
determining the annual distribution requirement, we will incur
corporate income tax and the 4% nondeductible excise tax with
respect to those non-cash income items if we do not distribute
those items on a current basis. As a result of the foregoing, we
may have less cash than is necessary to distribute all of our
taxable income and thereby avoid corporate income tax and the
excise tax imposed on certain undistributed income. In such a
situation, we may need to borrow funds or issue additional
common or preferred stock.
Under certain circumstances, we may be able to correct a failure
to meet the distribution requirement for a year by paying
deficiency dividends to our stockholders in a later
year. We may include such deficiency dividends in our deduction
for dividends paid for the earlier year. Although we may be able
to avoid income tax on amounts distributed as deficiency
dividends, we will be required to pay interest to the IRS based
upon the amount of any deduction we take for deficiency
dividends.
|
|
|
Recordkeeping Requirements |
We must maintain certain records in order to qualify as a REIT.
In addition, to avoid a monetary penalty, we must request on an
annual basis information from our stockholders designed to
disclose the actual ownership of our outstanding stock. We
intend to comply with these requirements.
Failure to Qualify
Beginning with our 2005 taxable year, if we fail to satisfy one
or more requirements for REIT qualification, other than the
gross income tests and the asset tests, we could avoid
disqualification if our failure is due to reasonable cause and
not to willful neglect and we pay a penalty of $50,000 for each
such failure. In addition, there are relief provisions for a
failure of the gross income tests and asset tests, as described
in Requirements for QualificationGross Income
Tests and Requirements for
QualificationAsset Tests.
If we fail to qualify as a REIT in any taxable year, and no
relief provision applies, we would be subject to federal income
tax and any applicable alternative minimum tax on our taxable
income at regular corporate rates. In calculating our taxable
income in a year in which we fail to qualify as a REIT, we would
not be able to deduct amounts paid out to stockholders. In fact,
we would not be required to distribute any amounts to
stockholders in that year. In such event, to the extent of our
current and accumulated earnings and profits, all distributions
to stockholders would be taxable as ordinary income. Subject to
certain limitations of the federal income tax laws, corporate
stockholders might be eligible for the dividends received
deduction and domestic non-corporate stockholders might be
eligible for the reduced federal income tax rate of 15% on such
dividends. Unless we qualified for relief under specific
statutory provisions, we also would be disqualified from
taxation as a REIT for the four taxable years following the year
during which we ceased to qualify as a REIT. We cannot predict
whether in all circumstances we would qualify for such statutory
relief.
Taxable REIT Subsidiaries
As described above, we may own up to 100% of the stock of one or
more TRSs. A TRS is a fully taxable corporation that may earn
income that would not be qualifying income if earned directly by
us. A corporation will not qualify as a TRS if it directly or
indirectly operates or manages any hotels or health care
facilities or provides rights to any brand name under which any
hotel or health care facility is operated.
132
We and our corporate subsidiary must elect for the subsidiary to
be treated as a TRS. A corporation of which a qualifying TRS
directly or indirectly owns more than 35% of the voting power or
value of the stock will automatically be treated as a TRS.
Overall, no more than 20% of the value of our assets may consist
of securities of one or more TRSs, and no more than 25% of the
value of our assets may consist of the securities of TRSs and
other non-TRS taxable subsidiaries and other assets that are not
qualifying assets for purposes of the 75% asset test.
The TRS rules limit the deductibility of interest paid or
accrued by a TRS to us to assure that the TRS is subject to an
appropriate level of corporate taxation. Further, the rules
impose a 100% excise tax on transactions between a TRS and us or
our tenants that are not conducted on an arms-length basis.
We have elected to treat NYMC as a TRS. NYMC originates our
loans and is subject to corporate income tax on its taxable
income. We believe that all transactions between us and NYMC and
any other TRS that we form or acquire (including sales of loans
from NYMC to us or a qualified REIT subsidiary) have been and
will be conducted on an arms-length basis.
Taxation of Taxable U.S. Stockholders
As long as we qualify as a REIT, a taxable
U.S. stockholder must take into account as
ordinary income distributions made out of our current or
accumulated earnings and profits that we do not designate as
capital gain dividends or retained long-term capital gain. A
U.S. stockholder will not qualify for the dividends
received deduction generally available to corporations. The term
U.S. stockholder means a holder of our common
stock that, for United States federal income tax purposes, is:
|
|
|
|
|
a citizen or resident of the United States; |
|
|
|
a corporation or partnership (including an entity treated as a
corporation or partnership for U.S. federal income tax
purposes) created or organized under the laws of the United
States, any of its states or the District of Columbia; |
|
|
|
an estate whose income is subject to U.S. federal income
taxation regardless of its source; or |
|
|
|
any trust if (i) a U.S. court is able to exercise
primary supervision over the administration of such trust and
one or more U.S. persons have the authority to control all
substantial decisions of the trust or (ii) it has a valid
election in place to be treated as a U.S. person. |
A U.S. stockholder generally will recognize distributions
that we designate as capital gain dividends as long-term capital
gain without regard to the period for which the
U.S. stockholder has held its common stock. We generally
will designate our capital gain dividends as either 15% or 25%
rate distributions. See Capital Gains and
Losses. A corporate U.S. stockholder, however, may be
required to treat up to 20% of certain capital gain dividends as
ordinary income.
We may elect to retain and pay income tax on the net long-term
capital gain that we receive in a taxable year. In that case, a
U.S. stockholder would be taxed on its proportionate share
of our undistributed long-term capital gain. The
U.S. stockholder would receive a credit or refund for its
proportionate share of the tax we paid. The
U.S. stockholder would increase the basis in its common
stock by the amount of its proportionate share of our
undistributed long-term capital gain, minus its share of the tax
we paid.
A U.S. stockholder will not incur tax on a distribution in
excess of our current and accumulated earnings and profits if
the distribution does not exceed the adjusted basis of the
U.S. stockholders common stock. Instead, the
distribution will reduce the adjusted basis of such common
stock. A U.S. stockholder will recognize a distribution in
excess of both our current and accumulated earnings and profits
and the U.S. stockholders adjusted basis in his or
her common stock as long-term capital gain, or short-term
capital gain if the common stock has been held for one year or
less, assuming the common stock is a capital asset in the hands
of the U.S. stockholder. In addition, if we declare a
distribution in October, November, or December of any year that
is payable to a U.S. stockholder of record on a specified
date in any such month, such distribution shall be treated as
both paid by us and received by the U.S. stockholder on
December 31 of such year, provided that we actually pay the
distribution during January of the following calendar year.
133
Dividends paid to a U.S. stockholder generally will not
qualify for the 15% tax rate for qualified dividend
income. The Jobs and Growth Tax Relief Reconciliation Act
of 2003 reduced the maximum tax rate for qualified dividend
income from 38.6% to 15% for tax years 2003 through 2008.
Without future congressional action, the maximum tax rate on
qualified dividend income will move to 35% in 2009 and 39.6% in
2011. Qualified dividend income generally includes dividends
paid by domestic C corporations and certain qualified foreign
corporations to most U.S. noncorporate stockholders.
Because we are not generally subject to federal income tax on
the portion of our REIT taxable income distributed to our
stockholders, our dividends generally will not be eligible for
the 15% rate on qualified dividend income. As a result, our
ordinary REIT dividends will be taxed at the higher tax rate
applicable to ordinary income. Currently, the highest marginal
individual income tax rate on ordinary income is 35%. However,
the 15% tax rate for qualified dividend income will apply to our
ordinary REIT dividends, if any, that are (i) attributable
to dividends received by us from non-REIT corporations, such as
our TRS, and (ii) attributable to income upon which we have
paid corporate income tax (e.g., to the extent that we
distribute less than 100% of our taxable income). In general, to
qualify for the reduced tax rate on qualified dividend income, a
stockholder must hold our common stock for more than
60 days during the 121-day period beginning on the date
that is 60 days before the date on which our common stock
becomes ex-dividend.
Stockholders may not include in their individual income tax
returns any of our net operating losses or capital losses.
Instead, these losses are generally carried over by us for
potential offset against our future income. Taxable
distributions from us and gain from the disposition of the
common stock will not be treated as passive activity income and,
therefore, stockholders generally will not be able to apply any
passive activity losses, such as losses from certain
types of limited partnerships in which the stockholder is a
limited partner, against such income. In addition, taxable
distributions from us and gain from the disposition of our
common stock generally will be treated as investment income for
purposes of the investment interest limitations. We will notify
stockholders after the close of our taxable year as to the
portions of the distributions attributable to that year that
constitute ordinary income, return of capital, and capital gain.
We may recognize taxable income in excess of our economic
income, known as phantom income, in the first years that we hold
certain investments, and experience an offsetting excess of
economic income over our taxable income in later years. As a
result, stockholders at times may be required to pay federal
income tax on distributions that economically represent a return
of capital rather than a dividend. These distributions would be
offset in later years by distributions representing economic
income that would be treated as returns of capital for federal
income tax purposes. Taking into account the time value of
money, this acceleration of federal income tax liabilities may
reduce a stockholders after-tax return on his or her
investment to an amount less than the after-tax return on an
investment with an identical before-tax rate of return that did
not generate phantom income. For example, if an investor with a
30% tax rate purchases a taxable bond with an annual interest
rate of 10% on its face value, the investors before-tax
return on the investment would be 10% and the investors
after-tax return would be 7%. However, if the same investor
purchased our common stock at a time when the before-tax rate of
return was 10%, the investors after-tax rate of return on
such stock might be somewhat less than 7% as a result of our
phantom income. In general, as the ratio of our phantom income
to our total income increases, the after-tax rate of return
received by a taxable stockholder will decrease. We will
consider the potential effects of phantom income on our taxable
stockholders in managing our investments.
Any excess inclusion income that we recognize generally will be
allocated among our stockholders to the extent that it exceeds
our undistributed REIT taxable income in a particular year. A
stockholders share of excess inclusion income would not be
allowed to be offset by any net operating losses otherwise
available to the stockholder.
Taxation of U.S. Stockholders on the Disposition of
Common Stock
In general, a U.S. stockholder who is not a dealer in
securities must treat any gain or loss realized upon a taxable
disposition of our common stock as long-term capital gain or
loss if the U.S. stockholder has held the common stock for
more than one year and otherwise as short-term capital gain or
loss. However, a U.S. stockholder must treat any loss upon
a sale or exchange of common stock held by such stockholder for
six months or less as a long-term capital loss to the extent of
capital gain dividends and any other actual or
134
deemed distributions from us that such U.S. stockholder
treats as long-term capital gain. All or a portion of any loss
that a U.S. stockholder realizes upon a taxable disposition
of the common stock may be disallowed if the
U.S. stockholder purchases other common stock within
30 days before or after the disposition.
Capital Gains and Losses
A taxpayer generally must hold a capital asset for more than one
year for gain or loss derived from its sale or exchange to be
treated as long-term capital gain or loss. The highest marginal
individual income tax rate currently is 35% (which rate will
apply for the period from January 1, 2003 to
December 31, 2010). The maximum tax rate on long-term
capital gain applicable to non-corporate taxpayers is 15% for
sales and exchanges of assets held for more than one year
occurring from May 7, 2003 through December 31, 2008.
The maximum tax rate on long-term capital gain from the sale or
exchange of section 1250 property, or
depreciable real property, is 25% to the extent that such gain
would have been treated as ordinary income if the property were
section 1245 property. With respect to
distributions that we designate as capital gain dividends and
any retained capital gain that we are deemed to distribute, we
generally may designate whether such a distribution is taxable
to our non-corporate stockholders at a 15% or 25% rate. Thus,
the tax rate differential between capital gain and ordinary
income for non-corporate taxpayers may be significant. In
addition, the characterization of income as capital gain or
ordinary income may affect the deductibility of capital losses.
A non-corporate taxpayer may deduct capital losses not offset by
capital gains against its ordinary income only up to a maximum
annual amount of $3,000. A non-corporate taxpayer may carry
forward unused capital losses indefinitely. A corporate taxpayer
must pay tax on its net capital gain at ordinary corporate
rates. A corporate taxpayer may deduct capital losses only to
the extent of capital gains, with unused losses being carried
back three years and forward five years.
Information Reporting Requirements and Backup Withholding
We will report to our stockholders and to the IRS the amount of
distributions we pay during each calendar year, and the amount
of tax we withhold, if any. Under the backup withholding rules,
a stockholder may be subject to backup withholding at a rate of
28% with respect to distributions unless the holder:
|
|
|
|
|
is a corporation or comes within certain other exempt categories
and, when required, demonstrates this fact; or |
|
|
|
provides a taxpayer identification number, certifies as to no
loss of exemption from backup withholding, and otherwise
complies with the applicable requirements of the backup
withholding rules. |
A stockholder who does not provide us with its correct taxpayer
identification number also may be subject to penalties imposed
by the IRS. Any amount paid as backup withholding will be
creditable against the stockholders income tax liability.
In addition, we may be required to withhold a portion of capital
gain distributions to any stockholders who fail to certify their
non-foreign status to us. For a discussion of the backup
withholding rules as applied to non-U.S. stockholders. See
Taxation of Non-U.S. Stockholders.
Taxation of Tax-Exempt Stockholders
Tax-exempt entities, including qualified employee pension and
profit sharing trusts and individual retirement accounts,
generally are exempt from federal income taxation. However, they
are subject to taxation on their unrelated business taxable
income, or UBTI. While many investments in real estate generate
UBTI, the IRS has issued a ruling that dividend distributions
from a REIT to an exempt employee pension trust do not
constitute UBTI so long as the exempt employee pension trust
does not otherwise use the shares of the REIT in an unrelated
trade or business of the pension trust. Based on that ruling,
amounts that we distribute to tax-exempt stockholders generally
should not constitute UBTI. However, if a tax-exempt stockholder
were to finance its acquisition of common stock with debt, a
portion of the income that it receives from us would constitute
UBTI pursuant to the debt-financed property rules.
Moreover, social clubs, voluntary employee benefit associations,
supplemental unemployment benefit trusts and qualified group
legal services plans that are exempt from taxation under special
provisions of the federal income tax laws are subject to
different UBTI rules, which generally will require them to
characterize distributions that they receive from us as UBTI.
135
Furthermore, a tax-exempt stockholders share of any excess
inclusion income that we recognize would be subject to tax as
UBTI. Finally, in certain circumstances, a qualified employee
pension or profit sharing trust that owns more than 10% of our
stock must treat a percentage of the dividends that it receives
from us as UBTI. Such percentage is equal to the gross income we
derive from an unrelated trade or business, determined as if we
were a pension trust, divided by our total gross income for the
year in which we pay the dividends. That rule applies to a
pension trust holding more than 10% of our stock only if:
|
|
|
|
|
the percentage of our dividends that the tax-exempt trust must
treat as UBTI is at least 5%; |
|
|
|
we qualify as a REIT by reason of the modification of the rule
requiring that no more than 50% of our stock be owned by five or
fewer individuals that allows the beneficiaries of the pension
trust to be treated as holding our stock in proportion to their
actuarial interests in the pension trust; and |
|
|
|
either |
|
|
|
|
|
one pension trust owns more than 25% of the value of our
stock; or |
|
|
|
a group of pension trusts individually holding more than 10% of
the value of our stock collectively owns more than 50% of the
value of our stock. |
Taxation of Non-U.S. Stockholders
The rules governing U.S. federal income taxation of
nonresident alien individuals, foreign corporations, foreign
partnerships, and other foreign stockholders are complex. This
section is only a summary of such rules. We urge
non-U.S. stockholders to consult their own tax advisors to
determine the impact of federal, state, and local income tax
laws on ownership of our common stock, including any reporting
requirements.
A non-U.S. stockholder that receives a distribution that is
not attributable to gain from our sale or exchange of
U.S. real property interests, as defined below, and that we
do not designate as a capital gain dividend or retained capital
gain will recognize ordinary income to the extent that we pay
the distribution out of our current or accumulated earnings and
profits. A withholding tax equal to 30% of the gross amount of
the distribution ordinarily will apply unless an applicable tax
treaty reduces or eliminates the tax. However, if a distribution
is treated as effectively connected with the
non-U.S. stockholders conduct of a U.S. trade or
business, the non-U.S. stockholder generally will be
subject to federal income tax on the distribution at graduated
rates, in the same manner as U.S. stockholders are taxed on
distributions and also may be subject to the 30% branch profits
tax in the case of a corporate non-U.S. stockholder. We
plan to withhold U.S. income tax at the rate of 30% on the
gross amount of any distribution paid to a
non-U.S. stockholder unless either:
|
|
|
|
|
a lower treaty rate applies and the non-U.S. stockholder
files an IRS Form W-8BEN evidencing eligibility for that
reduced rate with us, or |
|
|
|
the non-U.S. stockholder files an IRS Form W-8ECI with
us claiming that the distribution is effectively connected
income. |
However, reduced treaty rates are not available to the extent
that the income allocated to the foreign stockholder is excess
inclusion income. Our excess inclusion income generally will be
allocated among our stockholders to the extent that it exceeds
our undistributed REIT taxable income in a particular year.
A non-U.S. stockholder will not incur tax on a distribution
in excess of our current and accumulated earnings and profits if
the excess portion of the distribution does not exceed the
adjusted basis of its common stock. Instead, the excess portion
of the distribution will reduce the adjusted basis of that
common stock. A non-U.S. stockholder will be subject to tax
on a distribution that exceeds both our current and accumulated
earnings and profits and the adjusted basis of the common stock,
if the non-U.S. stockholder otherwise would be subject to
tax on gain from the sale or disposition of its common stock, as
described below. Because we generally cannot determine at the
time we make a distribution whether or not the distribution will
exceed our current and accumulated earnings and profits, we
normally will withhold tax on the entire amount of any
distribution at the same rate as we would withhold on a
dividend. However, a non-U.S. stockholder may obtain a
refund of amounts that we withhold if we later determine that a
distribution in fact exceeded our current and accumulated
earnings and profits.
136
For any year in which we qualify as a REIT, a
non-U.S. stockholder will incur tax on distributions that
are attributable to gain from our sale or exchange of
United States real property interests under
special provisions of the federal income tax laws known as
FIRPTA. The term United States real
property interests includes interests in real property and
shares in corporations at least 50% of whose assets consists of
interests in real property. The term United
States real property interests does not include
mortgage loans or mortgage-backed securities. As a result, we do
not anticipate that we will generate material amounts of gain
that would be subject to FIRPTA. Under the FIRPTA rules, a
non-U.S. stockholder is taxed on distributions attributable
to gain from sales of United States real property interests
as if the gain were effectively connected with a
U.S. business of the non-U.S. stockholder. A
non-U.S. stockholder thus would be taxed on such a
distribution at the normal capital gain rates applicable to
U.S. stockholders, subject to applicable alternative
minimum tax and a special alternative minimum tax in the case of
a nonresident alien individual. A non-U.S. corporate
stockholder not entitled to treaty relief or exemption also may
be subject to the 30% branch profits tax on such a distribution.
We must withhold 35% of any such distribution that we could
designate as a capital gain dividend. A
non-U.S. stockholder may receive a credit against our tax
liability for the amount we withhold. Tax legislation enacted in
2004 created an exception to the FIRPTA rules that applies if
our common stock is regularly traded on an established
securities market. Under that new exception, if our common stock
is regularly traded on an established securities market, capital
gain distributions that are attributable to our sale of real
property will be treated as ordinary dividends rather than as
gain from the sale of a United States real property interest, as
long as the non-U.S. stockholder did not own more than 5% of
that class of our stock during the taxable year. As a result,
non-U.S. stockholders generally would be subject to withholding
tax on such capital gain distributions in the same manner as
they are subject to withholding tax on ordinary dividends. We
expect that our common stock will continue to be regularly
traded on an established securities market.
In the unlikely event that at least 50% of the assets we hold
were determined to be United States real property
interests, gains from the sale of our common stock by a
non-U.S. stockholder could be subject to a FIRPTA tax.
However, even if that event were to occur, a
non-U.S. stockholder generally would not incur tax under
FIRPTA on gain from the sale of our common stock as long as at
all times non-U.S. persons hold, directly or indirectly,
less than 50% in value of our stock. We cannot assure you that
this test will be met. In addition, a non-U.S. stockholder
that owned, actually or constructively, 5% or less of our common
stock at all times during a specified testing period will not
incur tax under FIRPTA on gain from the sale of our common stock
if the common stock is regularly traded on an
established securities market. Because our common stock is
regularly traded on an established securities market, a non-
U.S. stockholder that owns 5% or less of our common stock
would not incur tax under FIRPTA on the gain from the sale of
its common stock. If the gain on the sale of the common stock
were taxed under FIRPTA, a non-U.S. stockholder would be
taxed on that gain in the same manner as U.S. stockholders,
subject to applicable alternative minimum tax and a special
alternative minimum tax in the case of nonresident alien
individuals. Furthermore, a non-U.S. stockholder generally
will incur tax on gain not subject to FIRPTA if:
|
|
|
|
|
the gain is effectively connected with the
non-U.S. stockholders U.S. trade or business, in
which case the non-U.S. stockholder will be subject to the
same treatment as U.S. stockholders with respect to such
gain, or |
|
|
|
the non-U.S. stockholder is a nonresident alien individual
who was present in the U.S. for 183 days or more
during the taxable year and has a tax home in the
United States, in which case the non-U.S. stockholder will
incur a 30% tax on his or her capital gains. |
State and Local Taxes
We and/or our stockholders may be subject to taxation by various
states and localities, including those in which we or a
stockholder transacts business, owns property or resides. The
state and local tax treatment may differ from the federal income
tax treatment described above. Consequently, stockholders should
consult their own tax advisors regarding the effect of state and
local tax laws upon an investment in the common stock.
137
UNDERWRITING
We are offering our common stock described in this prospectus
through a number of underwriters. Friedman, Billings,
Ramsey & Co., Inc. is acting as the representative of
the underwriters. Subject to the terms and conditions contained
in the underwriting agreement, we have agreed to sell to the
underwriters, and each of the underwriters has severally agreed
to purchase from us, on a firm commitment basis, the number of
shares of common stock listed next to its name in the following
table:
|
|
|
|
|
Underwriters |
|
Number of Shares | |
|
|
| |
Friedman, Billings, Ramsey & Co., Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
J.P. Morgan Securities Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
6,000,000 |
|
The underwriters are obligated to take and pay for all of the
common stock offered if any of the shares of common stock are
taken.
The underwriters will initially offer the shares of our common
stock to the public at the price specified on the cover page of
this prospectus. The underwriters may allow to selected dealers
a concession of not more than
$ per
share. The underwriters may also allow, and any dealers may
reallow, a concession of not more than
$ per
share to selected other dealers. If all the shares are not sold
at the public offering price, the underwriters may change the
public offering price and the other selling terms. Our shares of
common stock are offered subject to a number of conditions,
including:
|
|
|
|
|
receipt and acceptance of our common stock by the
underwriters; and |
|
|
|
the underwriters right to reject orders in whole or in
part. |
We have granted the underwriters an option, exercisable in one
or more installments for 30 days after the date of this
prospectus, to purchase up to 900,000 additional shares of
common stock to cover over-allotments, if any, at the public
offering price less the underwriting discount set forth on the
cover page of this prospectus.
The following table shows the amount per share and total
underwriting discount we will pay to the underwriters assuming
both no exercise and full exercise of the underwriters
option to purchase up to 900,000 additional shares to cover
over-allotments.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
No Exercise | |
|
Full Exercise | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Per share
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
We estimate that the total expenses of this offering to be paid
by us, not including the underwriting discount, will be
approximately
$ .
We entered into an engagement letter agreement with Friedman,
Billings, Ramsey & Co. Inc. pursuant to which Friedman,
Billings, Ramsey & Co. Inc. agreed to act as financial
advisor and lead underwriter and bookrunner for this offering.
We have agreed to reimburse the underwriters for certain
expenses in connection with this offering, estimated to be
approximately
$ ,
which are included in the
$ of
estimated offering expenses described above.
Each of our officers and directors has agreed with the
underwriters, for a period of 90 days after the date of
this prospectus, subject to certain exceptions, not to sell any
shares of common stock or any securities convertible into or
exchangeable for shares of common stock owned by them without
the prior written consent of the lead underwriter. A total of
3,505,696 shares of our common stock will be subject to
these lock-up agreements. We have also agreed with the
underwriters, for a period of 90 days after the date of
this prospectus, subject to certain exceptions, not to sell or
issue any shares of common stock or any securities convertible
into or exchangeable for shares of common stock, or file any
registration statement with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (except a registration statement on Form S-8
relating to our stock incentive plan), without the prior written
consent of the lead underwriter, except that we may make grants
of options or shares of restricted common stock under our equity
incentive plan and issue shares upon exercise of
138
those options. However, the lead underwriter may, in its sole
discretion and at any time without notice, release all or any
portion of the securities subject to these agreements.
We will indemnify the underwriters against various liabilities,
including liabilities under the Securities Act of 1933, as
amended. If we are unable to provide this indemnification, we
will contribute to payments the underwriters may be required to
make in respect of those liabilities.
Our common stock is currently listed on the New York Stock
Exchange under the symbol NTR.
In connection with this offering, the underwriters may engage in
activities that stabilize, maintain or otherwise affect the
price of our common stock, including:
|
|
|
|
|
stabilizing transactions; |
|
|
|
short sales; |
|
|
|
syndicate covering transactions; |
|
|
|
imposition of penalty bids; and |
|
|
|
purchases to cover positions created by short sales. |
Stabilizing transactions consist of bids or purchases made for
the purpose of preventing or retarding a decline in the market
price of our common stock while this offering is in progress.
Stabilizing transactions may include making short sales of our
common stock, which involves the sale by the underwriters of a
greater number of shares of common stock than it is required to
purchase in this offering, and purchasing common stock from us
or in the open market to cover positions created by short sales.
Short sales may be covered shorts, which are short
positions in an amount not greater than the underwriters
over-allotment option referred to above, or may be
naked shorts, which are short positions in excess of
that amount.
The underwriters may close out any covered short position either
by exercising their over-allotment option, in whole or in part,
or by purchasing shares in the open market. In making this
determination, the underwriters will consider, among other
things, the price of shares available for purchase in the open
market compared to the price at which the underwriters may
purchase shares pursuant to the over-allotment option.
A naked short position is more likely to be created if the
underwriters are concerned that there may be downward pressure
on the price of our common stock in the open market that could
adversely affect investors who purchased in this offering. To
the extent that the underwriters create a naked short position,
the underwriters will purchase shares in the open market to
cover the position.
The underwriters also may impose a penalty bid on selling group
members. This means that if the underwriters purchase shares in
the open market in stabilizing transactions or to cover short
sales, the underwriters can require the selling group members
that sold those shares as part of this offering to repay the
selling concession received by them.
As a result of these activities, the price of our common stock
may be higher than the price that otherwise might exist in the
open market. If the underwriters commence these activities, they
may discontinue them at any time. The underwriters may carry out
these transactions on The New York Stock Exchange, in the
over-the-counter market or otherwise.
The lead underwriter has advised us that the underwriters do not
confirm sales to accounts over which they exercise discretionary
authority.
The underwriters or their affiliates may provide us with certain
commercial banking, financial advisory and investment banking
services in the future, for which they would receive customary
compensation.
A prospectus in electronic format may be available on the
Internet sites of or through other online services maintained by
the underwriters and selling group members participating in this
offering, or by their affiliates. In those cases, prospective
investors may view offering terms online and, depending upon the
underwriter or the selling group member, prospective investors
may be allowed to place orders online. The underwriters may
agree with us to allocate a specific number of shares for sale
to online brokerage account
139
holders. Any such allocation for online distributions will be
made by the underwriters on the same basis as other allocations.
Other than the prospectus in electronic format, the information
on the underwriters or any selling group members web
site and any information contained in any other web site
maintained by the underwriters or any selling group member is
not part of the prospectus or the registration statement of
which this prospectus forms a part, has not been approved or
endorsed by us or the underwriters or any selling group member
in its capacity as underwriter or selling group member and
should not be relied upon by investors.
LEGAL MATTERS
Certain legal matters will be passed upon for us by our counsel,
Hunton & Williams LLP. Venable LLP, Baltimore, Maryland
will issue an opinion to us regarding certain matters of
Maryland law including the validity of the common stock offered
hereby. Certain legal matters related to the offering will be
passed upon for the underwriters by McDermott Will &
Emery LLP.
EXPERTS
The financial statements as of December 31, 2004 and 2003,
and for each of the three years in the period ended
December 31, 2004, included in this prospectus have been
audited by Deloitte & Touche LLP, an
independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in
their report appearing herein and elsewhere in the registration
statement, and have been so included in reliance upon the
reports of such firm given upon their authority as experts in
accounting and auditing.
140
WHERE YOU CAN FIND MORE INFORMATION
We have filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission a
registration statement on Form S-11, including exhibits and
schedules filed with the registration statement of which this
prospectus is a part, under the Securities Act with respect to
the common stock we propose to sell in this offering. This
prospectus does not contain all of the information set forth in
the registration statement and exhibits and schedules to the
registration statement. For further information with respect to
our company and the common stock we propose to sell in this
offering, we refer you to the registration statement, including
the exhibits and schedules to the registration statement. Copies
of the registration statement, including the exhibits and
schedules to the registration statement, may be examined without
charge at the public reference room of the Securities and
Exchange Commission 100 F Street, N.W.,
Washington, DC 20549. The Securities and Exchange
Commissions toll-free number is 1-800-SEC-0330. In
addition, the Securities and Exchange Commission maintains a web
site, http://www.sec.gov, which contains reports, proxy
and information statements and other information regarding
registrants, including us, that file electronically with the
Securities and Exchange Commission.
We are subject to the information and reporting requirements
of the Securities Exchange Act, and file periodic reports, proxy
statements and make available to our stockholders annual reports
containing audited financial information for each year and
quarterly reports for the first three quarters of each fiscal
year containing unaudited interim financial information.
141
INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page | |
|
|
| |
New York Mortgage Trust, Inc.:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-2 |
|
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31,
2005 (UNAUDITED) AND 2004 (UNAUDITED) AND THE YEARS ENDED
DECEMBER 31, 2004, 2003 AND 2002
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-3 |
|
|
|
|
|
F-4 |
|
|
|
|
|
F-5 |
|
|
|
|
|
F-6 |
|
|
|
|
|
F-8 |
|
F-1
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of
New York Mortgage Trust, Inc.
New York, NY
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of
New York Mortgage Trust, Inc. and subsidiaries (the
Company) as of December 31, 2004 and 2003, and the
related consolidated statements of income, stockholders/
members equity (deficit), and cash flows for each of the
three years in the period ended December 31, 2004. These
financial statements are the responsibility of the
Companys management. Our responsibility is to express an
opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are
free of material misstatement. The Company has determined it is
not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit
of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audit
included consideration of internal control over financial
reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are
appropriate in the circumstances but not for the purpose of
expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Companys
internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we
express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a
test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in
the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles
used and significant estimates made by management, as well as
evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We
believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our
opinion.
In our opinion, such consolidated financial statements present
fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of New
York Mortgage Trust, Inc. and subsidiaries as of
December 31, 2004 and 2003, and the results of their
operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in
the period ended December 31, 2004, in conformity with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of
America.
|
|
|
/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP |
New York, New York
March 24, 2005
F-2
NEW YORK MORTGAGE TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, | |
|
December 31, | |
|
December 31, | |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Unaudited) | |
|
|
|
|
ASSETS |
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$ |
6,906,403 |
|
|
$ |
7,613,106 |
|
|
$ |
4,047,260 |
|
Restricted cash
|
|
|
415,335 |
|
|
|
2,341,712 |
|
|
|
217,330 |
|
Investment securities available for sale
|
|
|
1,112,989,795 |
|
|
|
1,204,744,714 |
|
|
|
|
|
Due from loan purchasers
|
|
|
91,340,070 |
|
|
|
79,904,315 |
|
|
|
58,862,433 |
|
Escrow deposits pending loan closings
|
|
|
22,441,628 |
|
|
|
16,235,638 |
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts and accrued interest receivable
|
|
|
13,046,687 |
|
|
|
15,554,201 |
|
|
|
2,707,517 |
|
Marketable securities available for sale
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,588,562 |
|
Mortgage loans held for sale
|
|
|
99,554,363 |
|
|
|
85,384,927 |
|
|
|
36,169,307 |
|
Mortgage loans held in the securitization trust
|
|
|
417,383,398 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage loans held for investment
|
|
|
68,462,832 |
|
|
|
190,153,103 |
|
|
|
|
|
Prepaid and other assets
|
|
|
8,063,281 |
|
|
|
4,351,869 |
|
|
|
2,140,907 |
|
Derivative assets
|
|
|
10,796,803 |
|
|
|
3,677,572 |
|
|
|
316,435 |
|
Property and equipment, net
|
|
|
4,984,767 |
|
|
|
4,801,302 |
|
|
|
2,031,697 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL ASSETS
|
|
$ |
1,856,385,362 |
|
|
$ |
1,614,762,459 |
|
|
$ |
110,081,448 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS/MEMBERS EQUITY
(DEFICIT) |
LIABILITIES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financing arrangements, portfolio investments
|
|
$ |
1,423,641,000 |
|
|
$ |
1,115,809,285 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
Financing arrangements, loans held for sale/for investment
|
|
|
271,664,999 |
|
|
|
359,202,980 |
|
|
|
90,425,133 |
|
|
Due to loan purchasers
|
|
|
415,235 |
|
|
|
350,884 |
|
|
|
753,720 |
|
|
Accounts payable and accrued expenses
|
|
|
19,790,050 |
|
|
|
19,485,241 |
|
|
|
4,277,241 |
|
|
Subordinated notes due to members
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,706,902 |
|
|
Subordinated debentures
|
|
|
25,000,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative liabilities
|
|
|
838,928 |
|
|
|
164,816 |
|
|
|
261,511 |
|
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
376,971 |
|
|
|
267,034 |
|
|
|
130,566 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
1,741,727,183 |
|
|
|
1,495,280,240 |
|
|
|
110,555,073 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES (Note 10)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
STOCKHOLDERS/ MEMBERS EQUITY (DEFICIT):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $0.01 par value, 400,000,000 shares
authorized 18,114,445 shares issued and 17,797,375
outstanding at March 31, 2005 (unaudited) and
December 31, 2004
|
|
|
180,621 |
|
|
|
180,621 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
115,485,603 |
|
|
|
119,045,450 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Members deficit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,338,625 |
) |
|
Accumulated earnings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)
|
|
|
(1,008,045 |
) |
|
|
256,148 |
|
|
|
865,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders/members equity (deficit)
|
|
|
114,658,179 |
|
|
|
119,482,219 |
|
|
|
(473,625 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS/ MEMBERS EQUITY
(DEFICIT)
|
|
$ |
1,856,385,362 |
|
|
$ |
1,614,762,459 |
|
|
$ |
110,081,448 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-3
NEW YORK MORTGAGE TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended | |
|
|
|
|
March 31, | |
|
For the Year Ended December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Unaudited) | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
REVENUE:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain on sales of mortgage loans
|
|
$ |
4,320,500 |
|
|
$ |
3,506,089 |
|
|
$ |
20,835,387 |
|
|
$ |
23,030,669 |
|
|
$ |
9,858,183 |
|
|
Interest income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans held for sale
|
|
|
2,592,890 |
|
|
|
1,261,069 |
|
|
|
6,904,651 |
|
|
|
7,609,631 |
|
|
|
2,986,248 |
|
|
|
|
Investment securities
|
|
|
12,721,738 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,393,977 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans held in the securitization trust
|
|
|
1,801,915 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Brokered loan fees
|
|
|
2,000,233 |
|
|
|
2,182,779 |
|
|
|
6,894,629 |
|
|
|
6,682,571 |
|
|
|
5,241,070 |
|
|
Gain on sale of securities
|
|
|
377,083 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
774,415 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Miscellaneous income
|
|
|
114,052 |
|
|
|
15,769 |
|
|
|
226,677 |
|
|
|
45,579 |
|
|
|
14,417 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue
|
|
|
23,928,411 |
|
|
|
6,965,706 |
|
|
|
56,029,736 |
|
|
|
37,368,450 |
|
|
|
18,099,918 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EXPENSES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Salaries, commissions and benefits
|
|
|
7,142,761 |
|
|
|
2,719,178 |
|
|
|
17,118,321 |
|
|
|
9,246,869 |
|
|
|
5,787,834 |
|
|
Interest expense:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans held for sale
|
|
|
1,847,810 |
|
|
|
608,611 |
|
|
|
3,542,939 |
|
|
|
3,266,438 |
|
|
|
1,673,108 |
|
|
|
|
Investment securities and loans
|
|
|
9,764,172 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,469,579 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subordinated Debentures
|
|
|
77,756 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Brokered loan expenses
|
|
|
1,519,490 |
|
|
|
1,284,219 |
|
|
|
5,276,333 |
|
|
|
3,733,666 |
|
|
|
2,992,231 |
|
|
Occupancy and equipment
|
|
|
2,134,634 |
|
|
|
661,530 |
|
|
|
3,528,679 |
|
|
|
2,017,804 |
|
|
|
1,013,102 |
|
|
Marketing and promotion
|
|
|
1,399,866 |
|
|
|
484,286 |
|
|
|
3,189,969 |
|
|
|
1,008,418 |
|
|
|
488,339 |
|
|
Data processing and communications
|
|
|
517,721 |
|
|
|
168,043 |
|
|
|
1,598,132 |
|
|
|
607,897 |
|
|
|
366,182 |
|
|
Office supplies and expenses
|
|
|
572,686 |
|
|
|
217,871 |
|
|
|
1,518,927 |
|
|
|
802,954 |
|
|
|
505,119 |
|
|
Professional fees
|
|
|
744,068 |
|
|
|
253,088 |
|
|
|
2,005,388 |
|
|
|
958,922 |
|
|
|
509,980 |
|
|
Travel and entertainment
|
|
|
215,457 |
|
|
|
188,348 |
|
|
|
611,944 |
|
|
|
666,213 |
|
|
|
419,758 |
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
342,892 |
|
|
|
102,953 |
|
|
|
690,489 |
|
|
|
411,812 |
|
|
|
271,011 |
|
|
Other
|
|
|
376,658 |
|
|
|
160,075 |
|
|
|
791,465 |
|
|
|
921,381 |
|
|
|
322,975 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total expenses
|
|
|
26,655,971 |
|
|
|
6,848,202 |
|
|
|
52,342,165 |
|
|
|
23,642,374 |
|
|
|
14,349,639 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INCOME (LOSS) BEFORE INCOME TAX BENEFIT
|
|
|
(2,727,560 |
) |
|
|
117,504 |
|
|
|
3,687,571 |
|
|
|
13,726,076 |
|
|
|
3,750,279 |
|
|
Income tax benefit
|
|
|
2,690,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,259,534 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET INCOME (LOSS)
|
|
$ |
(37,560 |
) |
|
$ |
117,504 |
|
|
$ |
4,947,105 |
|
|
$ |
13,726,076 |
|
|
$ |
3,750,279 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic income per share
|
|
$ |
0.00 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
0.28 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted income per share
|
|
$ |
0.00 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
0.27 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding-basic
|
|
|
17,797,375 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,797,375 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding-diluted
|
|
|
17,797,375 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,114,737 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-4
NEW YORK MORTGAGE TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS/MEMBERS EQUITY
(DEFICIT)
For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2005 (unaudited)
and
For the Years Ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders | |
|
Other | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional | |
|
Members | |
|
Comprehensive | |
|
Comprehensive | |
|
|
|
|
Common | |
|
Paid-In | |
|
Retained | |
|
Income | |
|
Income | |
|
|
|
|
Stock | |
|
Capital | |
|
Earnings | |
|
(Loss) | |
|
(Loss) | |
|
Total | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
BALANCE, JANUARY 1, 2002
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Members Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
3,671,709 |
|
|
$ |
(1,980 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
3,669,729 |
|
|
Net Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,750,279 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
3,750,279 |
|
|
|
3,750,279 |
|
|
Contributions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
635,758 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
635,758 |
|
|
Distributions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,588,765 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,588,765 |
) |
|
Increase in net unrealized gain on available for sale securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33,254 |
|
|
|
33,254 |
|
|
|
33,254 |
|
|
Comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
3,783,533 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BALANCE, DECEMBER 31, 2002
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Members Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,468,981 |
|
|
|
31,274 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,500,255 |
|
|
Net Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,726,076 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
13,726,076 |
|
|
|
13,726,076 |
|
|
Distributions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(21,533,682 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(21,533,682 |
) |
|
Increase associated with cash flow hedges
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
51,069 |
|
|
|
51,069 |
|
|
|
51,069 |
|
|
Increase in net unrealized gain on available for sale securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
782,657 |
|
|
|
782,657 |
|
|
|
782,657 |
|
|
Comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
14,559,802 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BALANCE, DECEMBER 31, 2003
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Members Deficit
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
(1,338,625 |
) |
|
|
865,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(473,625 |
) |
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,947,105 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
4,947,105 |
|
|
|
4,947,105 |
|
|
Contributions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,309,448 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,309,448 |
|
|
Distributions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,134,807 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,134,807 |
) |
|
Forfeiture of 47,680 shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(492,536 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(492,536 |
) |
|
Dividends declared
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,470,286 |
) |
|
|
(2,783,121 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7,253,407 |
) |
|
Initial public offerings Common stock
|
|
|
180,621 |
|
|
|
121,910,479 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
122,091,100 |
|
Vested restricted stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,742,749 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,742,749 |
|
|
Vested performance shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
249,296 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
249,296 |
|
|
Vested stock options
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
105,748 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
105,748 |
|
|
Decrease in net unrealized gain on available for sale securities
and derivative instruments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(608,852 |
) |
|
|
(608,852 |
) |
|
|
(608,852 |
) |
|
Comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
4,338,253 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BALANCE, DECEMBER 31, 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders Equity
|
|
|
180,621 |
|
|
|
119,045,450 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
256,148 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
119,482,219 |
|
|
Net loss (unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(37,560 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(37,560 |
) |
|
Dividends declared (unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,528,611 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,528,611 |
) |
|
Vested restricted stock (unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
256,314 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
« |
|
|
|
256,314 |
|
|
Vested performance shares (unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
740,822 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
740,822 |
|
|
Vested stock options (unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,188 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,188 |
|
|
Decrease in net unrealized gain on available for sale securities
and derivative instruments (unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,264,193 |
) |
|
|
(1,264,193 |
) |
|
|
(1,264,193 |
) |
|
Comprehensive income (unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(1,264,193 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BALANCE, MARCH 31, 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders Equity (unaudited)
|
|
$ |
180,621 |
|
|
$ |
115,485,603 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(1,008,045 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
114,658,179 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-5
NEW YORK MORTGAGE TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended | |
|
|
|
|
March 31, | |
|
Years Ended December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Unaudited) | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income
|
|
$ |
(37,560 |
) |
|
$ |
117,504 |
|
|
$ |
4,947,105 |
|
|
$ |
13,726,076 |
|
|
$ |
3,750,279 |
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile net (loss) income to net cash used in
operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
342,892 |
|
|
|
102,953 |
|
|
|
690,489 |
|
|
|
411,812 |
|
|
|
271,011 |
|
|
Amortization of premium on investment securities and mortgage
loans
|
|
|
1,184,667 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,666,862 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain on sale of investment securities
|
|
|
(377,083 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(165,189 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,374 |
|
|
Gain on sale of marketable securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(774,415 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Origination of mortgage loans held for sale
|
|
|
(563,160,834 |
) |
|
|
(199,471,383 |
) |
|
|
(1,435,339,540 |
) |
|
|
(1,234,847,453 |
) |
|
|
(593,146,346 |
) |
|
Proceeds from sales of mortgage loans
|
|
|
411,669,894 |
|
|
|
188,110,364 |
|
|
|
1,386,123,920 |
|
|
|
1,232,710,820 |
|
|
|
569,001,035 |
|
|
Deferred compensation restricted stock non cash
|
|
|
740,822 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,742,749 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vesting of restricted shares compensation expense
|
|
|
256,314 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
249,296 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock option grants compensation expense
|
|
|
9,188 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
105,748 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax benefit
|
|
|
(2,690,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,309,534 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited share-non cash
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(492,536 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in value of derivatives
|
|
|
(976,807 |
) |
|
|
55,460 |
|
|
|
(313,565 |
) |
|
|
(107,431 |
) |
|
|
135,320 |
|
|
|
(Increase) decrease in operating assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Due from loan purchasers
|
|
|
(11,435,755 |
) |
|
|
(34,988,509 |
) |
|
|
(21,041,882 |
) |
|
|
(18,241,661 |
) |
|
|
(19,913,973 |
) |
|
|
|
Due from affiliate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(153,171 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Escrow deposits pending loan closings
|
|
|
(6,205,990 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(16,235,638 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts and accrued interest receivable
|
|
|
2,507,514 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12,846,684 |
) |
|
|
(1,499,105 |
) |
|
|
(1,094,930 |
) |
|
|
|
Prepaid and other assets
|
|
|
(1,021,412 |
) |
|
|
(798,023 |
) |
|
|
(2,210,962 |
) |
|
|
(1,115,603 |
) |
|
|
(949,867 |
) |
|
|
Increase (decrease) in operating liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Due to loan purchasers
|
|
|
64,351 |
|
|
|
207,694 |
|
|
|
(402,836 |
) |
|
|
(356,605 |
) |
|
|
944,556 |
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable and accrued expenses
|
|
|
123,665 |
|
|
|
2,250,502 |
|
|
|
12,170,067 |
|
|
|
2,737,390 |
|
|
|
798,684 |
|
|
|
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
109,937 |
|
|
|
130,315 |
|
|
|
136,468 |
|
|
|
(374,787 |
) |
|
|
463,162 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in operating activities
|
|
|
(168,896,197 |
) |
|
|
(44,283,123 |
) |
|
|
(83,300,077 |
) |
|
|
(7,109,718 |
) |
|
|
(39,720,695 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted cash
|
|
|
1,926,377 |
|
|
|
(38,455 |
) |
|
|
(2,124,382 |
) |
|
|
(15,199 |
) |
|
|
(114,370 |
) |
|
Purchase of marketable securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(338,442 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,006,575 |
) |
|
|
(1,520,576 |
) |
|
Net purchase of investment securities
|
|
|
(2,354,720 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,533,511,116 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase of mortgage loans held in the securitization trust
|
|
|
(167,873,446 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(190,153,103 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(continued)
F-6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended | |
|
|
|
|
March 31, | |
|
Years Ended December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Unaudited) | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal repayments received on loans held in the
securitization trust
|
|
|
5,599,985 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from sale of marketable securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
321,894 |
|
|
|
3,580,320 |
|
|
|
1,353,069 |
|
|
|
713,912 |
|
|
Sale of investment securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
197,350,620 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal paydown on investment securities
|
|
|
86,655,841 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
126,943,647 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of property and equipment
|
|
|
(526,357 |
) |
|
|
(82,335 |
) |
|
|
(3,460,094 |
) |
|
|
(1,471,705 |
) |
|
|
(519,015 |
) |
|
Payments received on loans held for investment
|
|
|
3,815,547 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities
|
|
|
(72,756,773 |
) |
|
|
(137,338 |
) |
|
|
(1,401,374,108 |
) |
|
|
(2,140,410 |
) |
|
|
(1,440,049 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of common stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
122,091,100 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Members contributions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,309,448 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
635,758 |
|
|
Cash distributions to members
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(663,165 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase in financing arrangements, net
|
|
|
220,293,734 |
|
|
|
45,708,401 |
|
|
|
1,384,587,132 |
|
|
|
17,408,965 |
|
|
|
43,311,688 |
|
|
Payments on debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(13,706,902 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends paid
|
|
|
(4,347,467 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,905,940 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash distributions to members
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,134,807 |
) |
|
|
(6,858,054 |
) |
|
|
(1,588,765 |
) |
|
Issuance of subordinated debentures
|
|
|
25,000,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by financing activities
|
|
|
240,946,267 |
|
|
|
45,045,236 |
|
|
|
1,488,240,031 |
|
|
|
10,550,911 |
|
|
|
42,358,681 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET INCREASE (DECREASE)IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS
|
|
|
(706,703 |
) |
|
|
624,775 |
|
|
|
3,565,846 |
|
|
|
1,300,783 |
|
|
|
1,197,937 |
|
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS Beginning of period
|
|
|
7,613,106 |
|
|
|
4,047,260 |
|
|
|
4,047,260 |
|
|
|
2,746,477 |
|
|
|
1,548,540 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS End of period
|
|
$ |
6,906,403 |
|
|
$ |
4,672,035 |
|
|
$ |
7,613,106 |
|
|
$ |
4,047,260 |
|
|
$ |
2,746,477 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid for interest
|
|
$ |
15,407,774 |
|
|
$ |
607,554 |
|
|
$ |
11,709,159 |
|
|
$ |
2,987,853 |
|
|
$ |
1,619,715 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NON CASH FINANCING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Distribution to members in the form of subordinated notes
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(1,000,000 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
14,706,902 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contribution from Members made from subordinated notes
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,000,000 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends declared to be paid in subsequent period
|
|
$ |
4,528,611 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
4,347,467 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grant of restricted stock
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,974,401 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-7
NEW YORK MORTGAGE TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
|
1. |
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies |
Organization New York Mortgage Trust, Inc.
(NYMT or the Company) is a fully
integrated, self-advised residential mortgage finance company
formed as a Maryland corporation in September 2003. The Company
earns net interest income from residential mortgage-backed
securities and fixed rate and adjustable-rate mortgage loans and
securities originated through its wholly-owned subsidiary, The
New York Mortgage Company, LLC (NYMC). The Company
also earns net interest income from its investment in and the
securitization of certain self-originated adjustable rate
mortgage loans that meet the Companys investment criteria.
Licensed or exempt from licensing in 40 states and through
a network of 31 full service loan origination locations and
32 satellite loan origination locations, NYMC originates
all types of mortgage loans, with a primary focus on prime,
residential mortgage loans.
On January 9, 2004, the Company capitalized New York
Mortgage Funding, LLC (NYMF) as a wholly-owned
subsidiary of the Company. In June 2004, the Company sold
15 million shares of its common stock in an initial public
offering (IPO) at a price to the public of
$9.00 per share, for net proceeds of approximately
$122 million after deducting the underwriters
discount and other offering expenses. Concurrent with the
Companys IPO, the Company issued 2,750,000 shares of
common stock in exchange for the contribution to the Company of
100% of the equity interests of NYMC. Subsequent to the IPO and
the contribution of NYMC, the Company had 18,114,445 shares
of common stock issued and 17,797,375 shares outstanding.
Prior to the IPO, NYMT did not have recurring business
operations.
On February 25, 2005, the Company completed its first loan
securitization of high-credit quality, first-lien, ARM loans, by
contributing loans into and issuing bonds out of New York
Mortgage Trust 2005-1 (NYMT
05-1 Trust). NYMT 05-1 Trust is a
wholly-owned subsidiary of NYMT. The securitization was
structured as a secured borrowing (On Balance Sheet
Securitization), with the line-of-credit financing used to
purchase and originate the mortgage loans refinanced through
repurchase agreements. On March 15, 2005, the Company
closed a private placement of $25 million of preferred
securities issued by NYM Preferred Trust I. NYM Preferred
Trust I is a wholly owned subsidiary of NYMC.
The Company is organized and conducts its operations to qualify
as a real estate investment trust (REIT) for federal
income tax purposes. As such, the Company will generally not be
subject to federal income tax on that portion of its income that
is distributed to stockholders if it distributes at least 90% of
its REIT taxable income to its stockholders by the due date of
its federal income tax return and complies with various other
requirements.
As used herein, references to the Company,
NYMT, we, our and
us refer to New York Mortgage Trust, Inc.,
collectively with its subsidiaries.
Basis of Presentation The consolidated
financial statements include the accounts of the Company
subsequent to the IPO and also include the accounts of NYMC and
NYMF prior to the IPO. As a result, our historical financial
results reflect the financial operations of this prior business
strategy of selling virtually all of the loans originated by
NYMC to third parties. All intercompany accounts and
transactions are eliminated in consolidation. Certain prior
period amounts have been reclassified to conform to current
period classifications, including the reclassification of
restricted cash from operating activities to investing
activities on the consolidated statements of cash flows.
The consolidated financial statements as of March 31, 2005
and 2004 and for the three-month periods then ended are
unaudited. The consolidated financial statements for interim
periods reflect all adjustments (consisting only of normal
recurring adjustments) that are, in the opinion of management,
necessary for the fair statement of the results for such interim
period. The results of operations for interim periods are not
necessarily indicative of results for the entire year.
F-8
NEW YORK MORTGAGE TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The combination of the Company and NYMC was accounted for as a
transfer of assets between entities under common control.
Accordingly, the Company has recorded assets and liabilities
transferred from NYMC at their carrying amounts in the accounts
of NYMC at the date of transfer.
Upon the closing of the Companys IPO, of the
2,750,000 shares exchanged for the equity interests of
NYMC, 100,000 shares were held in escrow through
December 31, 2004 and were available to satisfy any
indemnification claims the Company may have had against the
contributors of NYMC for losses incurred as a result of defaults
on any residential mortgage loans originated by NYMC and closed
prior to the completion of the IPO. As of December 31,
2004, the amount of escrowed shares was reduced by
47,680 shares, representing $492,536 for estimated losses
on loans closed prior to the Companys IPO. Furthermore,
the contributors of NYMC entered into a new escrow agreement,
which extended the escrow period to December 31, 2005 for
the remaining 52,320 shares.
Use of Estimates The preparation of financial
statements in conformity with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States of America (GAAP)
requires management to make estimates and assumptions that
affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and
disclosure of contingent liabilities at the date of the
financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and
expenses during the reporting period. The Companys
estimates and assumptions primarily arise from risks and
uncertainties associated with interest rate volatility,
prepayment volatility, credit exposure and regulatory changes.
Although management is not currently aware of any factors that
would significantly change its estimates and assumptions in the
near term, future changes in market conditions may occur which
could cause actual results to differ materially.
Cash and Cash Equivalents Cash and cash
equivalents include cash on hand, amounts due from banks and
overnight deposits. The Company maintains its cash and cash
equivalents in highly rated financial institutions, and at times
these balances exceed insurable amounts.
Restricted Cash Restricted cash amounts are
held by counterparties as collateral for two letters of credit
related to the lease of the corporate headquarters.
Marketable Securities Available for
Sale Marketable securities available for sale
are carried at fair value with unrealized gains and losses
reported in other comprehensive income (OCI).
Realized gains and losses on marketable securities available for
sale occurring from the sales of such investments are determined
using the specific identification method.
Due from Loan Purchasers Amounts due from
loan purchasers are a receivable for the principal and premium
due to us for loans that have been shipped but for which payment
has not yet been received at period end.
Escrow Deposits Pending Loan
Closing Escrow deposits pending loan closing are
advance cash fundings by us to escrow agents to be used to close
loans within the next one to three business days.
Investment Securities Available for Sale The
Companys investment securities are residential
mortgage-backed securities comprised of Fannie Mae
(FNMA), Freddie Mac (FHLMC) and
AAA rated adjustable-rate loans,
including adjustable-rate loans that have an initial fixed-rate
period. Investment securities are classified as available for
sale securities and are reported at fair value with unrealized
gains and losses reported in OCI. Realized gains and losses
recorded on the sale of investment securities available for sale
are based on the specific identification method and included in
gain on sale of securities. Purchase premiums or discounts on
investment securities are accreted or amortized to interest
income over the estimated life of the investment securities
using the interest method. Investment securities may be subject
to interest rate, credit and/or prepayment risk.
When the fair value of an available for sale security is less
than amortized cost, management considers whether there is an
other-than-temporary impairment in the value of the security
(e.g., whether the security will be sold prior to the recovery
of fair value). Management considers at a minimum the following
factors
F-9
NEW YORK MORTGAGE TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
that, both individually or in combination, could indicate the
decline is other-than-temporary: 1) the length
of time and extent to which the market value has been less than
book value; 2) the financial condition and near-term
prospects of the issuer; or 3) the intent and ability of
the Company to retain the investment in the issuer for a period
of time sufficient to allow for any anticipated recovery in
market value. If, in managements judgment, an
other-than-temporary impairment exists, the cost basis of the
security is written down to the then-current fair value, and the
unrealized loss is transferred from accumulated other
comprehensive income as an immediate reduction of current
earnings (i.e., as if the loss had been realized in the period
of impairment). Even though no credit concerns exist with
respect to an available for sale security, an other-
than-temporary impairment may be evident if management
determines that the Company does not have the intent and ability
to hold an investment until a forecasted recovery of the value
of the investment.
Mortgage Loans Held for Sale Mortgage loans
held for sale represent originated mortgage loans held for sale
to third party investors. The loans are initially recorded at
cost based on the principal amount outstanding net of deferred
direct origination costs and fees. The loans are subsequently
carried at the lower of cost or market value. Market value is
determined by examining outstanding commitments from investors
or current investor yield requirements, calculated on the
aggregate loan basis, less an estimate of the costs to close the
loan, and the deferral of fees and points received, plus the
deferral of direct origination costs. Gains or losses on sales
are recognized at the time title transfers to the investor which
is typically concurrent with the transfer of the loan files and
related documentation and are based upon the difference between
the sales proceeds from the final investor and the adjusted book
value of the loan sold.
Mortgage Loans Held in the Securitization
Trust Mortgage loans held in the securitization
trust, are certain ARM mortgage loans transferred to the NYMT
05-1 Trust which have been securitized into
sequentially rated classes of beneficial interests. Currently
the Company has retained 100% interest in the securitized loans
and the transfer has been accounted for as a secured borrowing
with a pledge of collateral. Mortgage loans held in the
securitization trust are recorded at amortized cost, using the
same accounting principles as that used for mortgage loans held
for investment, as described below.
Mortgage Loans Held for Investment The
Company retains substantially all of the adjustable-rate
mortgage loans originated that meet specific investment criteria
and portfolio requirements. Loans originated and retained in the
Companys portfolio are serviced through a subservicer.
Servicing is the function primarily consisting of collecting
monthly payments from mortgage borrowers, and disbursing those
funds to the appropriate loan investors.
Mortgage loans held for investment are recorded net of deferred
loan origination fees and associated direct costs and are stated
at amortized cost. Net loan origination fees and associated
direct mortgage loan origination costs are deferred and
amortized over the life of the loan as an adjustment to yield.
This amortization includes the effect of projected prepayments.
Interest income is accrued and recognized as revenue when earned
according to the terms of the mortgage loans and when, in the
opinion of management, it is collectible. The accrual of
interest on loans is discontinued when, in managements
opinion, the interest is not collectible in the normal course of
business, but in no case when payment becomes greater than
90 days delinquent. Loans return to accrual status when
principal and interest become current and are anticipated to be
fully collectible.
Credit Risk and Allowance for Loan Losses The
Company limits its exposure to credit losses on its portfolio of
residential adjustable-rate mortgage-backed securities by
purchasing securities that are guaranteed by a
government-sponsored or federally-chartered corporation
(FNMA or FHLMC) (collectively
Agency Securities) or that have a AAA
investment grade rating by at least one of two nationally
recognized rating agencies, Standard & Poors,
Inc. or Moodys Investors Service, Inc. at the time of
purchase.
The Company seeks to limit its exposure to credit losses on its
portfolio of residential adjustable-rate mortgage loans held for
investment (including mortgage loans held in the securitization
trust) by originating
F-10
NEW YORK MORTGAGE TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
and investing in loans primarily to borrowers with strong credit
profiles, which are evaluated by analyzing the borrowers
credit score (FICO is a credit score, ranging from
300 to 850, with 850 being the best score, based upon the credit
evaluation methodology developed by Fair, Isaac and Company, a
consulting firm specializing in creating credit evaluation
models), employment, income and assets and related
documentation, the amount of equity in and the value of the
property securing the borrowers loan, debt to income
ratio, credit history, funds available for closing and
post-closing liquidity.
The Company estimates an allowance for loan losses based on
managements assessment of probable credit losses in the
Companys investment portfolio of residential mortgage
loans. Mortgage loans are collectively evaluated for impairment
as the loans are homogeneous in nature. The allowance is based
upon managements assessment of various credit-related
factors, including current economic conditions, the credit
diversification of the portfolio, loan-to-value ratios,
delinquency status, historical credit losses, purchased mortgage
insurance and other factors deemed to warrant consideration. If
the credit performance of mortgage loans held for investment
deviates from expectations, the allowance for loan losses is
adjusted to a level deemed appropriate by management to provide
for estimated probable losses in the portfolio.
The allowance will be maintained through ongoing provisions
charged to operating income and will be reduced by loans that
are charged off. Determining the allowance for loan losses is
subjective in nature due to the estimation required.
Property and Equipment, Net Property and
equipment have lives ranging from three to seven years, and are
stated at cost less accumulated depreciation and amortization.
Depreciation is determined in amounts sufficient to charge the
cost of depreciable assets to operations over their estimated
service lives using the straight-line method. Leasehold
improvements are amortized over the lesser of the life of the
lease or service lives of the improvements using the
straight-line method.
Derivative Financial Instruments The Company
has developed risk management programs and processes, which
include investments in derivative financial instruments designed
to manage market risk associated with its mortgage banking and
its mortgage-backed securities investment activities.
All derivative financial instruments are reported as either
assets or liabilities in the consolidated balance sheet at fair
value. The gains and losses associated with changes in the fair
value of derivatives not designated as hedges are reported in
current earnings. If the derivative is designated as a fair
value hedge and is highly effective in achieving offsetting
changes in the fair value of the asset or liability hedged, the
recorded value of the hedged item is adjusted by its change in
fair value attributable to the hedged risk. If the derivative is
designated as a cash flow hedge, the effective portion of change
in the fair value of the derivative is recorded in OCI and is
recognized in the income statement when the hedged item affects
earnings. The Company calculates the effectiveness of these
hedges on an ongoing basis, and, to date, has calculated
effectiveness of approximately 100%. Ineffective portions, if
any, of changes in the fair value or cash flow hedges, are
recognized in earnings. (See Note 13).
In accordance with a Securities and Exchange Commission
(SEC) Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 105,
Application of Accounting Principles to Loan
Commitments (SAB 105) issued on
March 9, 2004, beginning in the second quarter of 2004, the
fair value of interest rate lock commitments (IRLCs)
excludes future cash flows related to servicing rights, if such
rights are retained upon the sale of originated mortgage loans.
Since the Company sells all of its originated loans with
servicing released, SAB 105 had no effect on the value of
its IRLCs.
Risk Management Derivative transactions are
entered into by the Company solely for risk management purposes.
The decision of whether or not an economic risk within a given
transaction (or portion thereof) should be hedged for risk
management purposes is made on a case-by-case basis, based on
the risks involved and other factors as determined by senior
management, including the financial impact on income, asset
valuation and restrictions imposed by the Internal Revenue Code
among others. In determining whether
F-11
NEW YORK MORTGAGE TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
to hedge a risk, the Company may consider whether other assets,
liabilities, firm commitments and anticipated transactions
already offset or reduce the risk. All transactions undertaken
to hedge certain market risks are entered into with a view
towards minimizing the potential for economic losses that could
be incurred by the Company. Under Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards No. 133, Accounting for
Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities
(SFAS No. 133), the Company is required to
formally document its hedging strategy before it may elect to
implement hedge accounting for qualifying derivatives. This
documentation was completed in the third quarter of 2003.
Accordingly, all qualifying derivatives entered into after
July 1, 2003 are intended to qualify as fair value, or cash
flow hedges, or free standing derivatives. To this end, terms of
the hedges are matched closely to the terms of hedged items with
the intention of minimizing ineffectiveness. Prior to
July 1, 2003, all derivatives entered into by the Company
were treated as free-standing derivatives, with changes in fair
value included in interest expense.
In the normal course of its mortgage loan origination business,
the Company enters into contractual interest rate lock
commitments to extend credit to finance residential mortgages.
These commitments, which contain fixed expiration dates, become
effective when eligible borrowers lock-in a specified interest
rate within time frames established by the Companys
origination, credit and underwriting practices. Interest rate
risk arises if interest rates change between the time of the
lock-in of the rate by the borrower and the sale of the loan.
Under SFAS No. 133, the IRLCs are considered
undesignated or free-standing derivatives. Accordingly, such
IRLCs are recorded at fair value with changes in fair value
recorded to current earnings. Mark to market adjustments on
IRLCs are recorded from the inception of the interest rate lock
through the date the underlying loan is funded. The fair value
of the IRLCs is determined by the interest rate differential
between the contracted loan rate and the currently available
market rates as of the reporting date.
To mitigate the effect of the interest rate risk inherent in
providing IRLCs from the lock-in date to the funding date of a
loan, the Company generally enters into forward sale loan
contracts (FSLC). The FSLCs in place prior to the
funding of a loan are undesignated derivatives under
SFAS No. 133 and are marked to market through current
earnings.
Derivative instruments contain an element of risk in the event
that the counterparties may be unable to meet the terms of such
agreements. The Company minimizes its risk exposure by limiting
the counterparties with which it enters into contracts to banks,
investment banks and certain private investors who meet
established credit and capital guidelines. Management does not
expect any counterparty to default on its obligations and,
therefore, does not expect to incur any loss due to counterparty
default. These commitments and option contracts are considered
in conjunction with the Companys lower of cost or market
valuation of its mortgage loans held for sale.
The Company uses other derivative instruments, including
treasury, agency or mortgage-backed securities forward sale
contracts which are also classified as free-standing,
undesignated derivatives and thus are recorded at fair value
with the changes in fair value recognized in current earnings.
Once a loan has been funded, the Companys primary risk
objective for its mortgage loans held for sale, is to protect
earnings from an unexpected charge due to a decline in value.
The Companys strategy is to engage in a risk management
program involving the designation of FSLCs (the same FSLCs
entered into at the time of rate lock) to hedge most of its
mortgage loans held for sale. Provided that the FSLCs were
entered into after July 1, 2003, they have been designated
as qualifying hedges for the funded loans and the notional
amount of the forward delivery contracts, along with the
underlying rate and critical terms of the contracts, are
equivalent to the unpaid principal amount of the mortgage loan
being hedged. The FSLCs effectively fix the forward sales price
and thereby offset interest rate and price risk to the Company.
Accordingly, the Company evaluates this relationship quarterly
and, at the time the loan is funded, classifies and accounts for
the FSLCs as cash flow hedges.
F-12
NEW YORK MORTGAGE TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Interest Rate Risk The Company hedges the
aggregate risk of interest rate fluctuations with respect to its
borrowings, regardless of the form of such borrowings, which
require payments based on a variable interest rate index. The
Company generally intends to hedge only the risk related to
changes in the benchmark interest rate (London Interbank Offered
Rate (LIBOR) or a Treasury rate).
In order to reduce such risks, the Company enters into swap
agreements whereby the Company receives floating rate payments
in exchange for fixed rate payments, effectively converting the
borrowing to a fixed rate. The Company also enters into cap
agreements whereby, in exchange for a fee, the Company is
reimbursed for interest paid in excess of a certain capped rate.
To qualify for cash flow hedge accounting, interest rate swaps
and caps must meet certain criteria, including:
|
|
|
|
|
the items to be hedged expose the Company to interest rate
risk; and |
|
|
|
the interest rate swaps or caps are expected to be and continue
to be highly effective in reducing the Companys exposure
to interest rate risk. |
The fair values of the Companys interest rate swap
agreements and interest rate cap agreements are based on market
values provided by dealers who are familiar with the terms of
these instruments. Correlation and effectiveness are
periodically assessed at least quarterly based upon a comparison
of the relative changes in the fair values or cash flows of the
interest rate swaps and caps and the items being hedged.
For derivative instruments that are designated and qualify as a
cash flow hedge (i.e. hedging the exposure to variability
in expected future cash flows that is attributable to a
particular risk), the effective portion of the gain or loss, and
net payments received or made, on the derivative instrument are
reported as a component of OCI and reclassified into earnings in
the same period or periods during which the hedged transaction
affects earnings. The remaining gain or loss on the derivative
instrument in excess of the cumulative change in the present
value of future cash flows of the hedged item, if any, is
recognized in current earnings during the period of change.
With respect to interest rate swaps and caps that have not been
designated as hedges, any net payments under, or fluctuations in
the fair value of, such swaps and caps, will be recognized in
current earnings.
Derivative financial instruments contain credit risk to the
extent that the issuing counterparties may be unable to meet the
terms of the agreements. The Company minimizes such risk by
using multiple counterparties and limiting its counterparties to
major financial institutions with investment grade credit
ratings. In addition, the potential risk of loss with any one
party resulting from this type of credit risk is constantly
monitored. Management does not expect any material losses as a
result of default by other parties.
Termination of Hedging Relationships The
Company employs a number of risk management monitoring
procedures to ensure that the designated hedging relationships
are demonstrating, and are expected to continue to demonstrate,
a high level of effectiveness. Hedge accounting is discontinued
on a prospective basis if it is determined that the hedging
relationship is no longer highly effective or expected to be
highly effective in offsetting changes in fair value of the
hedged item.
Additionally, the Company may elect to undesignate a hedge
relationship during an interim period and re-designate upon the
rebalancing of a hedge profile and the corresponding hedge
relationship. When hedge accounting is discontinued, the Company
continues to carry the derivative instruments at fair value with
changes recorded in current earnings.
Comprehensive Income Comprehensive income is
comprised primarily of net income (loss), from changes in value
of the Companys available for sale securities, and the
impact of deferred gains or losses on changes in the fair value
of derivative contracts hedging future cash flows.
F-13
NEW YORK MORTGAGE TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Gain on Sale of Mortgage Loans The Company
recognizes gain on sale of loans sold to third parties as the
difference between the sales price and the adjusted cost basis
of the loans when title transfers. The adjusted cost basis of
the loans includes the original principal amount adjusted for
deferrals of origination and commitment fees received, net of
direct loan origination costs paid.
Loan Origination Fees and Direct Origination
Cost The Company records loan fees, discount
points and certain incremental direct origination costs as an
adjustment of the cost of the loan and such amounts are included
in gain on sales of loans when the loan is sold. Accordingly,
salaries, compensation, benefits and commission costs have been
reduced by approximately $9,628,375 and $3,747,192 for the
three-month periods ended March 31, 2005
(unaudited) and 2004 (unaudited), respectively, because
such amounts are considered incremental direct loan origination
costs.
Brokered Loan Fees and Expenses The
Company records commissions associated with brokered loans when
such loans are closed with the borrower. Costs associated with
brokered loans are expensed when incurred.
Loan Commitment Fees Mortgage loans held
for sale: fees received for the funding of mortgage loans to
borrowers at pre-set conditions are deferred and recognized at
the date at which the loan is sold. Mortgage loans held for
investment: such fees are deferred and recognized into interest
income over the life of the loan based on the effective yield
method.
Employee Benefits Plans The Company sponsors
a defined contribution plan (the Plan) for all
eligible domestic employees. The Plan qualifies as a deferred
salary arrangement under Section 401(k) of the Internal
Revenue Code. Under the Plan, participating employees may defer
up to 25% of their pre-tax earnings, subject to the annual
Internal Revenue Code contribution limit. The Company matches
contributions up to a maximum of 25% of the first 5% of salary.
Employees vest immediately in their contribution and vest in the
Companys contribution at a rate of 25% after two full
years and then an incremental 25% per full year of service
until fully vested at 100% after five full years of service. The
Companys total contributions to the Plan were $70,280 and
$32,475 for the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004,
respectively.
Stock Based Compensation. The Company follows the
provisions of SFAS No. 123, Accounting for
Stock-Based Compensation
(SFAS No. 123) and SFAS No. 148,
Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation, Transition and
Disclosure (SFAS No. 148). The
provisions of SFAS 123 allow companies either to expense
the estimated fair value of stock options or to continue to
follow the intrinsic value method set forth in Accounting
Principles Board Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock
Issued to Employees (APB No. 25) and
disclose the pro forma effects on net income (loss) had the fair
value of the options been expensed. The Company has elected not
to apply APB No. 25 in accounting for its stock option
incentive plans and has expensed stock based compensation in
accordance with SFAS No. 123.
In December, 2004 the Financial Accounting Standards Board
(FASB) issued SFAS No. 123R,
Share-Based payment, (
SFAS No. 123R) which will require all
companies to measure compensation costs for all share-based
payments, including employee stock options, at fair value. This
statement will be effective for the Company with the quarter
beginning January 1, 2006. The Company has elected to
expense share based compensation in accordance with
SFAS No. 123 and therefore early adopting the
requirements of SFAS No. 123R. Accordingly, the
adoption of SFAS No. 123R will have no impact on the
Companys financial statements.
Marketing and Promotion The Company charges
the costs of marketing, promotion and advertising to expense in
the period incurred.
Income Taxes The Company operates so as to
qualify as a REIT under the requirements of the Internal Revenue
Code. Requirements for qualification as a REIT include various
restrictions on ownership of the Companys stock,
requirements concerning distribution of taxable income and
certain restrictions on the
F-14
NEW YORK MORTGAGE TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
nature of assets and sources of income. A REIT must distribute
at least 90% of its taxable income to its stockholders of which
85% plus any undistributed amounts from the prior year must be
distributed within the taxable year in order to avoid the
imposition of an excise tax. The remaining balance may extend
until timely filing of the Companys tax return in the
subsequent taxable year. Qualifying distributions of taxable
income are deductible by a REIT in computing taxable income.
NYMC changed its tax status upon completion of the IPO from a
pass-through subchapter S corporation to a taxable REIT
subsidiary and therefore subsequent to the IPO, is subject to
corporate income taxes. Accordingly, deferred tax assets and
liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences
attributable to differences between the financial statement
carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their
respective tax base upon the change in tax status. Deferred tax
assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates
expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those
temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled.
The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in
tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes
the enactment date.
Earnings Per Share Basic earnings per share
excludes dilution and is computed by dividing net income
available to common stockholders by the weighted-average number
of shares of common stock outstanding for the period. Diluted
earnings per share reflects the potential dilution that could
occur if securities or other contracts to issue common stock
were exercised or converted into common stock or resulted in the
issuance of common stock that then shared in the earnings of the
Company. For the three months ended March 31, 2005, diluted
loss per common share has not been presented for the period
because the impact of the conversion or exercise, as applicable,
of stock options, restricted stock and performance shares would
be anti-dilutive. For the year ended December 31, 2004,
weighted average shares outstanding-basic and diluted assume the
shares outstanding upon the Companys initial public
offering are outstanding for the full year.
New Accounting Pronouncements In March 2004,
the EITF reached a consensus on Issue No 03-1, The Meaning of
Other-Than-Temporary Impairment and Its Application to Certain
Investments. This Issue provides clarification with respect
to the meaning of other-than-temporary impairment and its
application to investments classified as either
available-for-sale or held-to-maturity under
SFAS No. 115, Accounting for Certain Investments in
Debt and Equity Securities, (including individual securities
and investments in mutual funds), and investments accounted for
under the cost method. The guidance for evaluating whether an
investment is other-than-temporarily impaired in EITF 03-1,
except for paragraphs 10-20, must be applied in
other-than-temporary impairment evaluations made in reporting
periods beginning after June 15, 2004. This Issue did not
have a material impact on the Companys financial condition
or results of operations.
|
|
2. |
Investment Securities Available For Sale |
Investment securities available for sale consist of the
following as of March 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, | |
|
December 31, | |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Unaudited) | |
|
|
Amortized cost
|
|
$ |
1,122,692,762 |
|
|
$ |
1,207,715,175 |
|
Gross unrealized gains
|
|
|
866,780 |
|
|
|
150,682 |
|
Gross unrealized losses
|
|
|
(10,569,747 |
) |
|
|
(3,121,143 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
$ |
1,112,989,795 |
|
|
$ |
1,204,744,714 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
None of the securities with unrealized losses have been in a
loss position for more than one year. The Company has the intent
and believes it has the ability to hold such investment
securities until recovery of their
F-15
NEW YORK MORTGAGE TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
amortized cost, to maturity if necessary. Substantially all of
the Companys investment securities available for sale are
pledged as collateral for borrowings under financial
arrangements (Note 8).
|
|
3. |
Mortgage Loans Held For Sale |
Mortgage loans held for sale consist of the following as of
March 31, 2005, December 31, 2004 and
December 31, 2003:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, | |
|
December 31, | |
|
December 31, | |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Unaudited) | |
|
|
|
|
Mortgage loans principal amount
|
|
$ |
99,350,664 |
|
|
$ |
85,105,027 |
|
|
$ |
36,168,003 |
|
Deferred origination costs net
|
|
|
203,699 |
|
|
|
279,900 |
|
|
|
1,304 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage loans held for sale
|
|
$ |
99,554,363 |
|
|
$ |
85,384,927 |
|
|
$ |
36,169,307 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Substantially all of the Companys mortgage loans held for
sale are pledged as collateral for borrowings under financing
arrangements (Note 9).
|
|
4. |
Mortgage Loans Held in the Securitization Trust |
Mortgage loans held in the securitization trust consist of the
following at March 31, 2005 (unaudited):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, | |
|
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
Mortgage loans principal amount
|
|
$ |
413,396,100 |
|
Deferred origination costs net
|
|
|
3,987,298 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total mortgage loans collateralizing debt obligations
|
|
$ |
417,383,398 |
|
|
|
|
|
Substantially all of the Companys mortgage loans held in
the securitization trust are pledged as collateral for
borrowings under financial arrangements (Note 8).
|
|
5. |
Mortgage Loans Held For Investment |
Mortgage loans held for investment consist of the following at
March 31, 2005, and December 31, 2004. There were no
mortgage loans held for investment at December 31, 2003.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, | |
|
December 31, | |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Unaudited) | |
|
|
Mortgage loans principal amount
|
|
$ |
68,011,188 |
|
|
$ |
188,858,607 |
|
Deferred origination cost-net
|
|
|
451,644 |
|
|
|
1,294,496 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total mortgage loans held for investment
|
|
$ |
68,462,832 |
|
|
$ |
190,153,103 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Substantially all of the Companys mortgage loans held for
investment are pledged as collateral for borrowings under
financing arrangements (Note 9).
F-16
NEW YORK MORTGAGE TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
6. |
Property and Equipment Net |
Property and equipment consist of the following as of
March 31, 2005, December 31, 2004 and
December 31, 2003:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, | |
|
December 31, | |
|
December 31, | |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Unaudited) | |
|
|
|
|
Office and computer equipment
|
|
$ |
3,669,655 |
|
|
$ |
3,191,096 |
|
|
$ |
1,433,700 |
|
Furniture and fixtures
|
|
|
2,004,143 |
|
|
|
2,031,778 |
|
|
|
721,966 |
|
Leasehold improvements
|
|
|
1,207,164 |
|
|
|
1,138,467 |
|
|
|
789,725 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total premises and equipment
|
|
|
6,880,962 |
|
|
|
6,361,341 |
|
|
|
2,945,391 |
|
Less: accumulated depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
(1,896,195 |
) |
|
|
(1,560,039 |
) |
|
|
(913,694 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and equipment net
|
|
$ |
4,984,767 |
|
|
$ |
4,801,302 |
|
|
$ |
2,031,697 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7. |
Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities |
The Company enters into derivatives to manage its interest rate
and market risk exposure associated with its mortgage banking
and its mortgage-backed securities investment activities. In the
normal course of its mortgage loan origination business, the
Company enters into contractual IRLCs to extend credit to
finance residential mortgages. To mitigate the effect of the
interest rate risk inherent in providing IRLCs from the lock-in
date to the funding date of a loan, the Company generally enters
into FSLCs. With regard to the Companys mortgage-backed
securities investment activities, the Company uses interest rate
swaps and caps to mitigate the effects of major interest rate
changes on net investment spread.
The following table summarizes the estimated fair value of
derivative assets and liabilities as of March 31, 2005,
December 31, 2004 and December 31, 2003:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, | |
|
December 31, | |
|
December 31, | |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Unaudited) | |
|
|
|
|
Derivative Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate caps
|
|
$ |
1,632,751 |
|
|
$ |
411,248 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
Interest rate swaps
|
|
|
8,596,927 |
|
|
|
3,228,457 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forward loan sale contracts loan commitments
|
|
|
169,505 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forward loan sale contracts mortgage loans held for
sale
|
|
|
154,759 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forward loan sale contracts TBA securities
|
|
|
242,861 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate lock commitments loan commitments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,270 |
|
|
|
227,513 |
|
|
Interest rate lock commitments mortgage loans held
for sale
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32,597 |
|
|
|
88,922 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total derivative assets
|
|
$ |
10,796,803 |
|
|
$ |
3,677,572 |
|
|
$ |
316,435 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-17
NEW YORK MORTGAGE TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, | |
|
December 31, | |
|
December 31, | |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Unaudited) | |
|
|
|
|
Derivative Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate lock commitments loan commitments
|
|
$ |
(370,786 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
Interest rate lock commitments mortgage loans held
for sale
|
|
|
(468,142 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forward loan sale contracts loan commitments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(23,557 |
) |
|
|
(133,682 |
) |
|
Forward loan sale contracts mortgage loans held for
sale
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,846 |
) |
|
|
(6,579 |
) |
|
Forward loan sale contracts TBA securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(139,413 |
) |
|
|
(121,250 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total derivative liabilities
|
|
$ |
(838,928 |
) |
|
$ |
(164,816 |
) |
|
$ |
(261,511 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The notional amounts of the Companys interest rate swaps,
interest rate caps and forward loan sales contracts as of
March 31, 2005 (unaudited) were $735.0 million,
$684.5 million and $114.4 million, respectively.
The notional amounts of the Companys interest rate swaps,
interest rate caps and forward loan sales contracts as of
December 31, 2004 were $670.0 million,
$250.0 million and $97.1 million, respectively.
The notional amounts of the Companys interest rate swaps,
interest rate caps and forward loan sales contracts as of
December 31, 2003 were $0, $0 and $54.5 million,
respectively.
The Company estimates that over the next twelve months,
approximately $1,126,962 of the net unrealized gains on the
interest rate swaps will be reclassified from accumulated OCI
into earnings.
|
|
8. |
Financing Arrangements, Portfolio Investments |
The Company has entered into repurchase agreements with third
party financial institutions to finance its residential
mortgage-backed securities and mortgage loans held in the
securitization trust. The repurchase agreements are short-term
borrowings that bear interest rates based on a spread to LIBOR,
and are secured by the residential mortgage-backed securities
and mortgage loans held in the securitization trust which they
finance. At March 31, 2005 (unaudited), the Company had
repurchase agreements with an outstanding balance of
approximately $1.53 billion and a weighted average interest
rate of 2.83%. At December 31, 2004, the Company had
repurchase agreements with an outstanding balance of
approximately $1.11 billion and a weighted average interest
rate of 2.35%. At March 31, 2005 (unaudited) and
December 31, 2004, securities and mortgage loans pledged as
collateral for repurchase agreements had estimated fair values
of approximately $1.53 billion and $1.16 billion,
respectively. As of March 31, 2005 (unaudited) all of the
repurchase agreements will mature within 73 days, with a
weighted average days to maturity equal to 22 days. The
Company has available to it $4.80 billion in commitments to
provide financings through such arrangements with 21 different
counterparties. Counterparties providing repurchase commitments
to the Company as of March 31, 2005 (unaudited) are: Banc
of America Securities LLC, Barclays Capital, Inc., Bear,
Stearns & Co. Inc., Cantor Fitzgerald Securities,
Citigroup Global Markets Inc., Countrywide Securities
Corporation, Credit Suisse First Boston LLC, Daiwa Securities
America, Inc., Deutsche Bank Securities, Inc., Goldman,
Sachs & Co., Greenwich Capital Markets, Inc.,
J.P. Morgan Securities, Inc., Lehman Brothers Inc., Merrill
Lynch Government Securities, Inc., Morgan Keegan &
Company, Morgan Stanley & Co. Incorporated, Nomura
Securities International, Inc., RBC Capital Markets Corporation,
UBS Securities LLC, Wachovia Capital Markets LLC, and WaMu
Capital Corp.
F-18
NEW YORK MORTGAGE TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
9. |
Financing Arrangements, Mortgage Loans Held for Sale or
Investment |
Financing arrangements consist of the following as of
March 31, 2005, December 31, 2004, and
December 31, 2003:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, | |
|
December 31, | |
|
|
March 31, 2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Unaudited) | |
|
|
|
|
$250 million master repurchase agreement expiring
December 5, 2005 bearing interest at one-month LIBOR plus
0.75% (3.57% at March 31, 2005). Principal repayments are
required 120 days from the funding date(a)
|
|
$ |
97,683,574 |
|
|
$ |
215,611,800 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$200 million revolving line of credit expiring
March 31, 2006 bearing interest at daily LIBOR plus spreads
from 1.125% to 2.000% depending on collateral (3.725% at
March 31, 2005). Principal repayments are required
90 days from the funding date
|
|
|
96,857,092 |
|
|
|
73,751,874 |
|
|
|
72,461,446 |
|
$150 million revolving line of credit which expires on
June 29, 2005 bearing interest at one-month LIBOR plus
1.00% (3.72% at March 31, 2005)
|
|
|
77,124,333 |
|
|
|
69,839,306 |
|
|
|
14,966,814 |
|
$15 million revolving line of credit (terminated and
syndicated into $50 million revolving line above) bearing
interest at the lesser of LIBOR plus 1.5% or the prime rate
(2.40% as of December 31, 2003)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,996,873 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
271,664,999 |
|
|
$ |
359,202,980 |
|
|
$ |
90,425,133 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
This credit facility, with Greenwich Capital Financial Products,
Inc., requires the Company to transfer specific collateral to
the lender under repurchase agreements; however, due to the rate
of turnover of the collateral by the Company, the counterparty
has not taken title to or recorded their interest in any of the
collateral transferred. Interest is paid to the counterparty
based on the amount of outstanding borrowings and on the terms
provided. |
The lines of credit are secured by all of the mortgage loans
held by the Company, except for the loans held in the
securitization trust. The lines contain various covenants
pertaining to, among other things, maintenance of certain
amounts of net worth, periodic income thresholds and working
capital. As of March 31, 2005 (unaudited), NYMC was not in
compliance with either the net income covenant or the net worth
covenant pertaining to the three financing arrangements noted in
the table above. Waivers from the lenders with respect to these
covenant violations for the three months ended March 31,
2005 have been obtained. As these annual agreements are
negotiated for renewal, these covenants may be further modified.
The agreements are each renewable annually, but are not
committed, meaning that the counterparties to the agreements may
withdraw access to the credit facilities at any time.
|
|
10. |
Commitments and Contingencies |
Loans Sold to Investors Generally, the
Company is not exposed to significant credit risk on its loans
sold to investors. In the normal course of business, the Company
is obligated to repurchase loans which do not meet certain terms
set by investors. Such loans are then generally repackaged and
sold to other investors.
F-19
NEW YORK MORTGAGE TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Loans Funding and Delivery Commitments At
March 31, 2005 (unaudited), December 31, 2004 and 2003
the Company had commitments to fund loans with agreed-upon rates
totaling approximately $245.1 million, $156.1 million
and $71.4 million, respectively. The Company hedges the
interest rate risk of such commitments and the recorded mortgage
loans held for sale balances primarily with FSLCs, which totaled
approximately $114.4 million, $97.1 million and
$54.5 million at March 31, 2005 (unaudited),
December 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively. The remaining
commitments to fund loans with agreed-upon rates are anticipated
to be sold through optional delivery contract investor programs.
The Company does not anticipate any material losses from such
sales.
Net Worth Requirements NYMC is required to
maintain certain specified levels of minimum net worth to
maintain its approved status with Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, HUD
and other investors. As of March 31, 2005 (unaudited) NYMC
is in compliance with all minimum net worth requirements.
Outstanding Litigation The Company is
involved in litigation arising in the normal course of business.
Although the amount of any ultimate liability arising from these
matters cannot presently be determined, the Company does not
anticipate that any such liability will have a material effect
on its consolidated financial statements.
Leases The Company leases its corporate
offices and certain retail facilities and equipment under
short-term lease agreements expiring at various dates through
2010. All such leases are accounted for as operating leases.
Total rental expense for property and equipment, which is
included within the financial statements, amounted to $1,257,010
and $634,583 for the three months ended March 31, 2005
(unaudited) and March 31, 2004 (unaudited), respectively
and $3,253,580, $2,099,496 and $1,086,495 for the years ended
December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively.
As of December 31, 2004 obligations under non-cancelable
operating leases that have an initial term of more than one year
are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ending December 31, |
|
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
$ |
4,150,604 |
|
2006
|
|
|
3,566,558 |
|
2007
|
|
|
3,133,382 |
|
2008
|
|
|
2,747,618 |
|
2009
|
|
|
1,997,828 |
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
1,878,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
17,473,990 |
|
|
|
|
|
Letters of Credit NYMC maintains a letter of
credit in the amount of $100,000 in lieu of a cash security
deposit for office lease dated June 1998 for our former
headquarters located at 304 Park Avenue South in New York City.
The sole beneficiary of this letter of credit is the owner of
the building, 304 Park Avenue South LLC. This letter of credit
is secured by cash deposited in a bank account maintained at
Signature Bank.
Subsequent to our headquarters move to a new location in New
York City in July 2003, in lieu of a cash security deposit for
our office lease, we entered into an irrevocable transferable
letter of credit in the amount of $313,000 with
PricewaterhouseCoopers, LLP (sublandlord), as beneficiary. This
letter of credit is secured by cash deposited in a bank account
maintained at HSBC bank.
On February 15, 2005, the Company entered into an
irrevocable standby letter of credit in an initial amount of
$500,000 with the beneficiary being CCC Atlantic, L.L.C., the
landlord of the Companys leased facility at 500 Burton
Avenue, Northfield, New Jersey. The letter of credit will serve
as security for leased office property, occupied by employees of
our subsidiary company Ivy League Mortgage, L.L.C. The letter of
F-20
NEW YORK MORTGAGE TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
credit is secured by the personal guarantee and a mortgage on
the home of the Ivy League Mortgage, L.L.C. branch manager. The
initial amount of the letter of credit will be reduced at each
of the first four annual anniversary dates by $50,000,
thereafter to remain at a value of $250,000 until termination on
April 1, 2015.
|
|
11. |
Related Party Transactions |
Upon completion of the Companys IPO and acquisition of
NYMC, Steven B. Schnall and Joseph V. Fierro, the former owners
of NYMC, were entitled to a distribution of NYMCs retained
earnings through the close of the Companys IPO on
June 29, 2004, not to exceed $4,500,000. As a result, a
distribution of $2,409,323 ($409,323 of retained earnings as of
March 31, 2004 plus an estimate of $2,000,000 for
NYMCs earnings through June 29, 2004) was made to the
former owners upon the close of the IPO. The subsequent earnings
and elimination of distributions and unrealized gains and losses
attributable to NYMC for the period prior to June 29, 2004
equated to a distribution overpayment of $1,309,448, for which
Messrs. Schnall and Fierro reimbursed the Company
immediately upon the finalization of the overpayment calculation
in July 2004.
Steven B. Schnall owns a 48% membership interest and Joseph V.
Fierro owns a 12% membership interest in Centurion Abstract, LLC
(Centurion), which provides title insurance
brokerage services for certain title insurance providers. From
time to time, NYMC refers its mortgage loan borrowers to
Centurion for assistance in obtaining title insurance in
connection with their mortgage loans, although the borrowers
have no obligation to utilize Centurions services. When
NYMCs borrowers elect to utilize Centurions services
to obtain title insurance, Centurion collects various fees and a
portion of the title insurance premium paid by the borrower for
its title insurance. Centurion received $174,381 in fees and
other amounts from NYMC borrowers for the three months ended
March 31, 2005 (unaudited). NYMC does not economically
benefit from such referrals.
|
|
12. |
Concentrations of Credit Risk |
The Company has originated loans predominantly in the eastern
United States. Loan concentrations are considered to exist when
there are amounts loaned to a multiple number of borrowers with
similar characteristics, which would cause their ability to meet
contractual obligations to be similarly impacted by economic or
other conditions. At March 31, 2005, December 31, 2004
and December 31, 2003, there were geographic concentrations
of credit risk exceeding 5% of the total loan balances within
mortgage loans held for sale as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, | |
|
December 31, | |
|
December 31, | |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Unaudited) | |
|
|
|
|
New York
|
|
|
38.8 |
% |
|
|
70.2 |
% |
|
|
82.8 |
% |
New Jersey
|
|
|
8.9 |
% |
|
|
7.4 |
% |
|
|
2.5 |
% |
Massachusetts
|
|
|
17.6 |
% |
|
|
6.6 |
% |
|
|
2.8 |
% |
Florida
|
|
|
2.8 |
% |
|
|
1.9 |
% |
|
|
5.7 |
% |
Connecticut
|
|
|
6.9 |
% |
|
|
5.0 |
% |
|
|
0.7 |
% |
F-21
NEW YORK MORTGAGE TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
At March 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004, there were
geographic concentrations of credit risk exceeding 5% of the
total loan balances within mortgage loans held in the
securitization trust and mortgage loans held for investment as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, | |
|
December 31, | |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(unaudited) | |
|
|
California
|
|
|
30.5 |
% |
|
|
51.3 |
% |
New York
|
|
|
24.2 |
% |
|
|
30.7 |
% |
Massachusetts
|
|
|
9.5 |
% |
|
|
|
|
New Jersey
|
|
|
5.3 |
% |
|
|
5.5 |
% |
There were no mortgage loans held in the securitization trust or
mortgage loans held for investment at December 31, 2003.
|
|
13. |
Fair Value of Financial Instruments |
Fair value estimates are made as of a specific point in time
based on estimates using market quotes, present value or other
valuation techniques. These techniques involve uncertainties and
are significantly affected by the assumptions used and the
judgments made regarding risk characteristics of various
financial instruments, discount rates, estimates of future cash
flows, future expected loss experience, and other factors.
Changes in assumptions could significantly affect these
estimates and the resulting fair values. Derived fair value
estimates cannot be necessarily substantiated by comparison to
independent markets and, in many cases, could not be necessarily
realized in an immediate sale of the instrument. Also, because
of differences in methodologies and assumptions used to estimate
fair values, the Companys fair values should not be
compared to those of other companies.
Fair value estimates are based on existing financial instruments
and do not attempt to estimate the value of anticipated future
business and the value of assets and liabilities that are not
considered financial instruments. Accordingly, the aggregate
fair value amounts presented below do not represent the
underlying value of the Company.
The fair value of certain assets and liabilities approximate
cost due to their short-term nature, terms of repayment or
interest rates associated with the asset or liability. Such
assets or liabilities include cash and cash equivalents, escrow
deposits, unsettled mortgage loan sales, and financing
arrangements. All forward delivery commitments and option
contracts to buy securities are to be contractually settled
within six months of the balance sheet date.
The following describes the methods and assumptions used by the
Company in estimating fair values of other financial instruments:
|
|
|
a. Investment Securities Available for
Sale Fair value is generally estimated based on
market prices provided by five to seven dealers who make markets
in these financial instruments. If the fair value of a security
is not reasonably available from a dealer, management estimates
the fair value based on characteristics of the security that the
Company receives from the issuer and based on available market
information. |
|
|
b. Mortgage Loans Held for Sale Fair
value is estimated using the quoted market prices for securities
backed by similar types of loans and current investor or dealer
commitments to purchase loans. |
|
|
c. Mortgage Loans Held for Investment
Mortgage loans held for investment are recorded at amortized
cost. Fair value is estimated using pricing models and taking
into consideration the aggregated characteristics of groups of
loans such as, but not limited to, collateral type, index,
interest rate, margin, |
F-22
NEW YORK MORTGAGE TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
|
length of fixed-rate period, life cap, periodic cap,
underwriting standards, age and credit estimated using the
quoted market prices for securities backed by similar types of
loans. |
|
|
d. Mortgage Loans Held in the Securitization
Trust - Mortgage loans held in the securitization trust
are recorded at amortized cost. Fair value is estimated using
pricing models and taking into consideration the aggregated
characteristics of groups of loans such as, but not limited to,
collateral type, index, interest rate, margin, length of
fixed-rate period, life cap, periodic cap, underwriting
standards, age and credit estimated using the quoted market
prices for securities backed by similar types of loans. |
|
|
e. Interest Rate Lock Commitments The
fair value of IRLCs is estimated using the fees and rates
currently charged to enter into similar agreements, taking into
account the remaining terms of the agreements and the present
creditworthiness of the counterparties. For fixed rate loan
commitments, fair value also considers the difference between
current levels of interest rates and the committed rates. The
fair value of IRLCs is determined in accordance with
SAB 105. |
|
|
f. Forward Sale Loan Contracts The
fair value of these instruments is estimated using current
market prices for dealer or investor commitments relative to the
Companys existing positions. |
The following tables set forth information about financial
instruments, except for those noted above for which the carrying
amount approximates fair value:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2005 (unaudited) | |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Estimated | |
|
|
Notional Amount | |
|
Carrying Amount | |
|
Fair Value | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Investment securities available for sale
|
|
$ |
1,109,603,785 |
|
|
$ |
1,112,989,795 |
|
|
$ |
1,112,989,795 |
|
Mortgage loans held for investment
|
|
|
68,011,188 |
|
|
|
68,462,832 |
|
|
|
68,401,520 |
|
Mortgage loans held in the securitization trust
|
|
|
413,396,100 |
|
|
|
417,383,398 |
|
|
|
415,698,386 |
|
Mortgage loans held for sale
|
|
|
99,350,664 |
|
|
|
99,554,363 |
|
|
|
100,028,276 |
|
Commitments and contingencies:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate lock commitments
|
|
|
245,419,888 |
|
|
|
(838,928 |
) |
|
|
(838,928 |
) |
|
Forward loan sales contracts
|
|
|
114,350,398 |
|
|
|
567,125 |
|
|
|
567,125 |
|
|
Interest rate swaps
|
|
|
735,000,000 |
|
|
|
8,596,927 |
|
|
|
8,596,927 |
|
|
Interest rate caps
|
|
|
684,451,791 |
|
|
|
1,632,751 |
|
|
|
1,632,751 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Estimated | |
|
|
Notional Amount | |
|
Carrying Amount | |
|
Fair Value | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Investment securities available for sale
|
|
$ |
1,194,055,340 |
|
|
$ |
1,204,744,714 |
|
|
$ |
1,204,744,714 |
|
Mortgage loans held for investment
|
|
|
188,858,607 |
|
|
|
190,153,103 |
|
|
|
190,608,241 |
|
Mortgage loans held for sale
|
|
|
85,105,027 |
|
|
|
85,384,927 |
|
|
|
86,097,867 |
|
Commitments and contingencies:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate lock commitments
|
|
|
156,110,472 |
|
|
|
37,867 |
|
|
|
37,867 |
|
|
Forward loan sales contracts
|
|
|
97,080,482 |
|
|
|
(164,816 |
) |
|
|
(164,816 |
) |
|
Interest rate swaps
|
|
|
670,000,000 |
|
|
|
3,228,457 |
|
|
|
3,228,457 |
|
|
Interest rate caps
|
|
|
250,000,000 |
|
|
|
411,248 |
|
|
|
411,248 |
|
F-23
NEW YORK MORTGAGE TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
Notional | |
|
Carrying | |
|
Estimated | |
|
|
Amount | |
|
Amount | |
|
Fair Value | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Mortgage loans held for sale
|
|
$ |
36,168,003 |
|
|
$ |
36,258,229 |
|
|
$ |
38,020,465 |
|
Commitments and contingencies:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate lock commitments
|
|
|
71,375,732 |
|
|
|
227,513 |
|
|
|
227,513 |
|
|
Forward loan sales contracts
|
|
|
54,522,057 |
|
|
|
(261,511 |
) |
|
|
(261,511 |
) |
The Company operates two segments:
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage Portfolio Management long-term
investment in high-quality, adjustable-rate mortgage loans and
residential mortgage-backed securities; and |
|
|
|
Mortgage Lending mortgage loan originations
as conducted by NYMC. |
Our mortgage portfolio management segment primarily invests in
adjustable-rate FNMA, FHLMC and AAA
rated residential mortgage-backed securities and high-quality
mortgages that are originated by our mortgage operations or that
may be acquired from third parties. The Companys equity
capital and borrowed funds are used to invest in residential
mortgage-backed securities, thereby producing net interest
income. Certain mortgage loans originated by our mortgage
lending operations or loans purchased from third parties are
securitized from time to time to improve liquidity and are
included in the Mortgage Portfolio Management Segment. The
Companys first securitization was completed on
February 25, 2005.
The mortgage lending segment originates residential mortgage
loans through the Companys taxable REIT subsidiary, NYMC.
Loans are originated through NYMCs retail and internet
branches and generate gain on sale revenue when the loans are
sold to third parties or revenue from brokered loans when the
loans are brokered to third parties.
F-24
NEW YORK MORTGAGE TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Prior to June 29, 2004, the Company conducted only mortgage
lending operations, so segment information is not presented
herein.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, 2005 (Unaudited) | |
|
|
| |
|
|
Mortgage | |
|
|
|
|
Portfolio | |
|
|
|
|
Management | |
|
Mortgage | |
|
|
|
|
Segment | |
|
Lending Segment | |
|
Total | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
REVENUE:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain on sales of mortgage loans
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
4,320,500 |
|
|
$ |
4,320,500 |
|
|
Interest income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans held for sale
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,592,890 |
|
|
|
2,592,890 |
|
|
|
|
Investment securities
|
|
|
12,721,738 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,721,738 |
|
|
|
|
Loans collateralizing debt obligations
|
|
|
1,801,915 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,801,915 |
|
|
Brokered loan fees
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,000,233 |
|
|
|
2,000,233 |
|
|
Gain on sale of securities
|
|
|
377,083 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
377,083 |
|
|
Miscellaneous income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
114,052 |
|
|
|
114,052 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue
|
|
|
14,900,736 |
|
|
|
9,027,675 |
|
|
|
23,928,411 |
|
EXPENSES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Salaries, commissions and benefits
|
|
|
508,092 |
|
|
|
6,634,669 |
|
|
|
7,142,761 |
|
|
Interest expense:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans held for sale
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,847,810 |
|
|
|
1,847,810 |
|
|
|
|
Investment securities and loans
|
|
|
9,764,172 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,764,172 |
|
|
|
|
Subordinated debentures
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
77,756 |
|
|
|
77,756 |
|
|
Brokered loan expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,519,490 |
|
|
|
1,519,490 |
|
|
Occupancy and equipment
|
|
|
3,308 |
|
|
|
2,131,326 |
|
|
|
2,134,634 |
|
|
Marketing and promotion
|
|
|
52,999 |
|
|
|
1,346,867 |
|
|
|
1,399,866 |
|
|
Data processing and communication
|
|
|
8,705 |
|
|
|
509,016 |
|
|
|
517,721 |
|
|
Office supplies and expenses
|
|
|
1,424 |
|
|
|
571,262 |
|
|
|
572,686 |
|
|
Professional fees
|
|
|
85,955 |
|
|
|
658,113 |
|
|
|
744,068 |
|
|
Travel and entertainment
|
|
|
1,186 |
|
|
|
214,271 |
|
|
|
215,457 |
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
2,589 |
|
|
|
340,303 |
|
|
|
342,892 |
|
|
Other
|
|
|
170,911 |
|
|
|
205,747 |
|
|
|
376,658 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total expenses
|
|
|
10,599,341 |
|
|
|
16,056,630 |
|
|
|
26,655,971 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INCOME (LOSS) BEFORE INCOME TAX BENEFIT
|
|
|
4,301,395 |
|
|
|
(7,028,955 |
) |
|
|
(2,727,560 |
) |
Income tax benefit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,690,000 |
|
|
|
2,690,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET INCOME (LOSS)
|
|
$ |
4,301,395 |
|
|
$ |
(4,338,955 |
) |
|
$ |
(37,560 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment assets
|
|
$ |
1,619,934,271 |
|
|
$ |
236,451,090 |
|
|
$ |
1,856,385,362 |
|
Segment equity
|
|
$ |
105,964,803 |
|
|
$ |
8,693,376 |
|
|
$ |
114,658,179 |
|
F-25
NEW YORK MORTGAGE TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
Mortgage Portfolio | |
|
|
|
|
Management | |
|
Mortgage | |
|
|
|
|
Segment | |
|
Lending Segment | |
|
Total | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
REVENUE:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain on sales of mortgage loans
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
20,835,387 |
|
|
$ |
20,835,387 |
|
|
Interest income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage loans held for sale
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,904,651 |
|
|
|
6,904,651 |
|
|
|
|
Investment securities and loans
|
|
|
20,393,977 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,393,977 |
|
|
Brokered loan fees
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,894,629 |
|
|
|
6,894,629 |
|
|
Gain on sale of marketable securities
|
|
|
167,440 |
|
|
|
606,975 |
|
|
|
774,415 |
|
|
Miscellaneous income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
226,677 |
|
|
|
226,677 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue
|
|
|
20,561,417 |
|
|
|
35,468,319 |
|
|
|
56,029,736 |
|
EXPENSES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Salaries, commissions and benefits
|
|
|
382,403 |
|
|
|
16,735,918 |
|
|
|
17,118,321 |
|
|
Interest expense:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage loans held for sale
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,542,939 |
|
|
|
3,542,939 |
|
|
|
|
Investment securities and loans
|
|
|
12,469,579 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,469,579 |
|
|
Brokered loan expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,276,333 |
|
|
|
5,276,333 |
|
|
Occupancy and equipment
|
|
|
9,604 |
|
|
|
3,519,075 |
|
|
|
3,528,679 |
|
|
Marketing and promotion
|
|
|
13,872 |
|
|
|
3,176,097 |
|
|
|
3,189,969 |
|
|
Data processing and communication
|
|
|
174,089 |
|
|
|
1,424,043 |
|
|
|
1,598,132 |
|
|
Office supplies and expenses
|
|
|
3,788 |
|
|
|
1,515,139 |
|
|
|
1,518,927 |
|
|
Professional fees
|
|
|
148,997 |
|
|
|
1,856,391 |
|
|
|
2,005,388 |
|
|
Travel and entertainment
|
|
|
838 |
|
|
|
611,106 |
|
|
|
611,944 |
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
1,960 |
|
|
|
688,529 |
|
|
|
690,489 |
|
|
Other
|
|
|
45,167 |
|
|
|
746,298 |
|
|
|
791,465 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total expenses
|
|
|
13,250,297 |
|
|
|
39,091,868 |
|
|
|
52,342,165 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INCOME (LOSS) BEFORE INCOME TAX BENEFIT
|
|
|
7,311,120 |
|
|
|
(3,623,549 |
) |
|
|
3,687,571 |
|
Income tax benefit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,259,534 |
) |
|
|
(1,259,534 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET INCOME (LOSS)
|
|
$ |
7,311,120 |
|
|
$ |
(2,364,015 |
) |
|
$ |
4,947,105 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment assets
|
|
$ |
1,413,954,577 |
|
|
$ |
200,807,882 |
|
|
$ |
1,614,762,459 |
|
Segment equity
|
|
$ |
107,541,994 |
|
|
$ |
11,940,225 |
|
|
$ |
119,482,219 |
|
Pursuant to the 2004 Stock Incentive Plan (the
Plan), eligible employees, officers and directors
are offered the opportunity to acquire the Companys common
stock through the grant of options and the award of restricted
stock under the Plan. The maximum number of options that may be
issued is 706,000 shares and the maximum number of
restricted stock awards that may be granted under the Plan is
794,250.
In connection with the Plan, the Company also awarded shares of
stock to employees upon certain performance criteria related to
the November 2004 acquisition of Guaranty Residential Lending.
F-26
NEW YORK MORTGAGE TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The Plan provides for the exercise price of options to be
determined by the Compensation Committee of the Board of
Directors (Compensation Committee) but not to be
less than the fair market value on the date the option is
granted. Options expire ten years after the grant date. As of
March 31, 2005 (unaudited), 556,500 options have been
granted pursuant to the Plan with a vesting period of two years.
The Company accounts for the fair value of its grants in
accordance with SFAS No. 123. The compensation cost
charged against income during the three months ended
March 1, 2005 (unaudited) and for the year ended
December 31, 2004 was $9,188 and $105,748, respectively.
A summary of the status of the Companys options as of
December 31, 2004 and changes during the year then ended is
presented below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted | |
|
|
|
|
Average | |
|
|
Number of | |
|
Exercise | |
|
|
Options | |
|
Price | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Outstanding at beginning of year
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
556,500 |
|
|
$ |
9.57 |
|
|
Canceled
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at end of year
|
|
|
556,500 |
|
|
$ |
9.57 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options exercisable at year-end
|
|
|
303,162 |
|
|
$ |
9.35 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average fair value of options granted during the year
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
9.57 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table summarizes information about stock options
at December 31, 2004:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options Outstanding | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted- | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average | |
|
|
|
Options Exercisable | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remaining | |
|
|
|
| |
|
Fair Value | |
|
|
Number | |
|
Contractual | |
|
Exercise | |
|
Number | |
|
Exercise | |
|
of Options | |
Range of Exercise Prices |
|
Outstanding | |
|
Life (Years) | |
|
Price | |
|
Exercisable | |
|
Price | |
|
Granted | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
$9.00
|
|
|
176,500 |
|
|
|
9.5 |
|
|
$ |
9.00 |
|
|
|
176,500 |
|
|
$ |
9.00 |
|
|
$ |
0.39 |
|
$9.83
|
|
|
380,000 |
|
|
|
9.9 |
|
|
|
9.83 |
|
|
|
126,662 |
|
|
|
9.83 |
|
|
|
0.29 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
556,500 |
|
|
|
9.8 |
|
|
$ |
9.57 |
|
|
|
303,162 |
|
|
$ |
9.35 |
|
|
$ |
0.32 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The fair value of each option grant is estimated on the date of
grant using the Binomial option-pricing model with the following
weighted-average assumptions:
|
|
|
|
|
Risk free interest rate
|
|
|
4.5 |
% |
Expected volatility
|
|
|
10 |
% |
Expected life
|
|
|
10 years |
|
Expected dividend yield
|
|
|
10.48 |
% |
As of March 31, 2005 (unaudited), the Company has awarded
482,625 shares of restricted stock under the Plan with
vesting periods between six and 36 months. During the three
months ended March 31, 2005 (unaudited) and for the
year ended December 31, 2004, the Company recognized
non-cash compensation expense of approximately $256,314 and
$1.7 million, respectively, relating to the vested portion
of restricted
F-27
NEW YORK MORTGAGE TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
stock grants. Dividends are paid on all restricted stock issued,
whether those shares are vested or not. In general, unvested
restricted stock is forfeited upon the recipients
termination of employment.
|
|
|
Performance based stock awards |
In November 2004, the Company acquired 15 full service and 26
satellite retail mortgage banking offices located in the
Northeast and Mid-Atlantic states from General Residential
Lending, Inc. Pursuant to that transaction, the Company has
committed to award 236,909 shares of the Companys
stock to certain employees of those branches upon attaining
predetermined production levels. The awards range in vesting
periods from 6 to 30 months with a share price set at the
December 2, 2005 grant date market value of $9.83 per
share. During the three months ended March 31, 2005
(unaudited) and for the year ended December 31, 2004,
the Company recognized non-cash compensation expense of $740,822
and $249,296, respectively, relating to the vested portion of
performance based stock awards. Unvested issued performance
share awards have no voting rights and do not earn dividends.
|
|
16. |
Subordinated Debentures |
On March 15, 2005 the Company closed a private placement of
$25 million of its trust preferred securities to Taberna
Preferred Funding I, Ltd., a pooled investment vehicle. The
securities were issued by NYM Preferred Trust I and are
fully guaranteed by the Company with respect to distributions
and amounts payable upon liquidation, redemption or repayment.
These securities have a floating interest rate equal to
three-month LIBOR plus 375 basis points, resetting
quarterly. The securities mature on March 15, 2035 and may
be called at par by the Company any time after March 15,
2010. NYMC entered into an interest rate cap agreement to limit
the maximum interest rate cost of the trust preferred securities
to 7.5%. The term of the interest rate cap agreement is five
years and resets quarterly in conjunction with the reset periods
of the trust preferred securities. The interest rate cap
agreement will be accounted for as a cash flow hedge transaction
in accordance with SFAS No. 133. In accordance with
the guidelines of SFAS No. 150 Accounting for
Certain Financial Instruments with Characteristics of both
Liabilities and Equity, the issued preferred stock of NYM
Preferred Trust I has been classified as subordinated
debentures in the liability section of the Companys
consolidated balance sheet.
|
|
17. |
Capital Stock and Earnings per Share |
The Company had 400,000,000 shares of common stock, par
value $0.01 per share, authorized with
18,114,445 shares issued and 17,797,375 outstanding as of
March 31, 2005 (unaudited) and December 31, 2004. Of
the common stock authorized, 794,250 shares were reserved
for issuance as restricted stock awards to employees, officers
and directors. As of March 31, 2005 (unaudited) and
December 31, 2004, 74,716 shares remain reserved for
issuance.
The Company calculates basic net income per share by dividing
net income for the period by weighted-average shares of common
stock outstanding for that period. Diluted net income per share
takes into account the effect of dilutive instruments, such as
stock options and unvested restricted stock, but uses the
average share price for the period in determining the number of
incremental shares that are to be added to the weighted-average
number of shares outstanding. For the year ended
December 31, 2004, weighted average shares outstanding
assume that the shares outstanding upon the Companys IPO
are outstanding for the full year ending December 31, 2004.
Earnings per share for periods prior to the IPO are not
presented as they are not representative of the Companys
current capital structure.
F-28
NEW YORK MORTGAGE TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The following table presents the computation of basic and
diluted net earnings per share as if all stock options were
outstanding for the periods indicated (in thousands, except net
earnings per share):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three | |
|
|
|
|
Months | |
|
|
|
|
Ended | |
|
|
|
|
March 31, | |
|
For the Year Ended | |
|
|
2005 | |
|
December 31, 2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Unaudited) | |
|
|
Numerator:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income
|
|
$ |
(38 |
) |
|
$ |
4,947 |
|
|
Denominator:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding
basic
|
|
|
17,797 |
|
|
|
17,797 |
|
Net effect of unvested restricted stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
224 |
|
Performance shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35 |
|
Escrowed shares(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
53 |
|
Net effect of stock options(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding
dilutive
|
|
|
17,797 |
|
|
|
18,115 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per share basic
|
|
$ |
0.00 |
|
|
$ |
0.28 |
|
Net income per share diluted
|
|
$ |
0.00 |
|
|
$ |
0.27 |
|
|
|
(1) |
Upon the closing of the Companys IPO, of the
2,750,000 shares exchanged for the equity interests of
NYMC, 100,000 shares were held in escrow through
December 31, 2004 and were available to satisfy any
indemnification claims the Company may have had against the
contributors of NYMC for losses incurred as a result of defaults
on any residential mortgage loans originated by NYMC and closed
prior to the completion of the IPO. As of December 31,
2004, the amount of escrowed shares was reduced by
47,680 shares, representing $492,536 for estimated losses
on loans closed prior to the Companys IPO. Furthermore,
the contributors of NYMC entered into a new escrow agreement,
which extended the escrow period to December 31, 2005 for
the remaining 52,320 shares. |
|
(2) |
The Company has granted 556,500 of the 706,000 stock options
available for issuance under the Companys 2004 stock
incentive plan. |
NYMT and its taxable subsidiary, NYMC, were S corporations
prior to June 28, 2004 pursuant to the Internal Revenue
Code of 1986, as amended, and as such did not incur any federal
income tax expense.
On June 28, 2004, NYMC became a C corporation for federal
and state income tax purposes and as such is subject to federal
and state income tax on its taxable income for periods after
June 28, 2004.
F-29
NEW YORK MORTGAGE TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
A reconciliation of the statutory income tax provision (benefit)
to the effective income tax provision for the quarter ended
March 31, 2005 (unaudited) is as follows.
|
|
|
|
|
Tax at statutory rate (35%)
|
|
$ |
(954,646 |
) |
Non-taxable REIT income
|
|
|
(1,505,143 |
) |
Transfer pricing of loans sold to nontaxable parent
|
|
|
38,136 |
|
State and local taxes
|
|
|
(556,891 |
) |
Net operating loss benefit not provided
|
|
|
295,659 |
|
Miscellaneous
|
|
|
(7,115 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Total provision (benefit)
|
|
$ |
(2,690,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
The income tax provision (benefit) for the quarter ended
March 31, 2005 (unaudited) is comprised of the following
components:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred | |
|
Total | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Regular Tax Provision (Benefit)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal
|
|
$ |
(2,133,109 |
) |
|
$ |
(2,133,109 |
) |
|
State
|
|
|
(556,891 |
) |
|
|
(556,891 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total tax expense (benefit)
|
|
$ |
(2,690,000 |
) |
|
$ |
(2,690,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The deferred tax asset at March 31, 2005 (unaudited)
includes a deferred tax asset of $4,565,398 and a deferred tax
liability of $565,864 which represents the tax effect of
differences between tax basis and financial statement carrying
amounts of assets and liabilities. The major sources of
temporary differences and their deferred tax effect at
March 31, 2005 (unaudited) are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net operating loss carryover
|
|
$ |
4,301,173 |
|
|
Restricted performance stock option expense
|
|
|
264,225 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deferred tax asset
|
|
|
4,565,398 |
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mark-to-market adjustments
|
|
|
211,890 |
|
|
Management compensation
|
|
|
193,046 |
|
Depreciation
|
|
|
160,928 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total deferred tax liability
|
|
|
565,864 |
|
|
|
|
|
Net deferred tax asset
|
|
$ |
3,999,534 |
|
|
|
|
|
F-30
NEW YORK MORTGAGE TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
A reconciliation of the statutory income tax provision (benefit)
to the effective income tax provision for the period June 28 to
December 31, 2004 is as follows.
|
|
|
|
|
Tax at statutory rate (35%)
|
|
$ |
1,290,650 |
|
Non-taxable REIT income
|
|
|
(2,558,892 |
) |
Transfer pricing of loans sold to nontaxable parent
|
|
|
292,150 |
|
State and local taxes
|
|
|
(372,095 |
) |
Change in tax status
|
|
|
298,553 |
|
Income earned prior to taxable status
|
|
|
(206,731 |
) |
Miscellaneous
|
|
|
(3,169 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Total provision (benefit)
|
|
$ |
(1,259,534 |
) |
|
|
|
|
The income tax provision (benefit) for the year ended
December 31, 2004 is comprised of the following components:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current | |
|
Deferred | |
|
Total | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Regular Tax Provision (Benefit)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(1,251,053 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,251,053 |
) |
|
State
|
|
$ |
50,000 |
|
|
|
(327,399 |
) |
|
|
(277,399 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
50,000 |
|
|
$ |
(1,578,452 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,528,452 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in Tax Status
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
212,800 |
|
|
$ |
212,800 |
|
|
State
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
56,118 |
|
|
|
56,118 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
268,918 |
|
|
|
268,918 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total tax expense (benefit)
|
|
$ |
50,000 |
|
|
$ |
(1,309,534 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,259,534 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The deferred tax asset at December 31, 2004 includes a
deferred tax asset of $1,578,452 and a deferred tax liability of
$268,918 which represents the tax effect of differences between
tax basis and financial statement carrying amounts of assets and
liabilities. The major sources of temporary differences and
their deferred tax effect at December 31, 2004 are as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net operating loss carryover
|
|
$ |
1,237,544 |
|
|
Restricted performance stock option expense
|
|
|
329,001 |
|
|
Management compensation
|
|
|
90,461 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,657,006 |
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mark-to-market adjustments
|
|
|
78,554 |
|
|
Depreciation
|
|
|
268,918 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
347,472 |
|
|
|
|
|
Net deferred tax asset
|
|
$ |
1,309,534 |
|
|
|
|
|
The net deferred tax asset is included in prepaid and other
assets on the accompanying consolidated balance sheet. Although
realization is not assured, management believes it is more
likely than not that all the
F-31
NEW YORK MORTGAGE TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
deferred tax assets will be realized. The net operating loss
carryforward expires at various intervals between 2012 and 2025.
On March 10, 2004 the Company completed a transaction with
SIB Mortgage Corporation, acquiring eight loan origination
branches including the locked and unlocked mortgage
loan pipelines (meaning in-process mortgage loans with or
without locked-in interest rates), furniture, fixtures,
equipment, computers, tangible personal property and leasehold
improvements (to the extent located in the branches), and
certain other assets in exchange for the
Companys assumption of certain expenses and obligations in
connection with the operation of these branches from and after
March 1, 2004. The Company hired 134 SIB employees who
work at these eight branches, which are located in Northfield,
New Jersey; Seaville, New Jersey; Haworth,
New Jersey; Rockville, Maryland; Virginia Beach, Virginia;
Fairfax, Virginia; Terre Haute, Indiana; and Fairfield,
Connecticut.
On November 15, 2004, the Company acquired 15 full service
and 26 satellite retail mortgage banking offices located in the
Northeast and Mid-Atlantic states from Guaranty Residential
Lending, Inc. The Company acquired an existing pipeline of
approximately $300 million in locked and unlocked mortgage
applications in conjunction with the branch acquisition. The
mortgage pipeline and other assets (primarily furniture,
fixtures and computer hardware and software) had a purchase
price of approximately $550,000 and $760,000, respectively. In
addition, the Company will pay a $250,000 contingency premium to
the seller provided that the former loan officers of the seller
become employed by the Company and originate, close and fund
$2 billion in mortgage loans during the twelve month period
after the closing date of the transaction. The Company also
assumed selected monthly lease obligations of approximately
$142,000 and hired approximately 275 new loan origination and
support personnel. As a result of this acquisition, the
Companys annual mortgage originations are expected to
approximately double.
F-32
NEW YORK MORTGAGE TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
20. |
Quarterly Financial Data (Unaudited) |
The following table is a comparative breakdown of our unaudited
quarterly results for the immediately preceding nine quarters
prior to March 31, 2005:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended | |
|
|
| |
|
|
Mar. 31, | |
|
Jun. 30, | |
|
Sep. 30, | |
|
Dec. 31, | |
|
Mar. 31, | |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain on sales of mortgage loans
|
|
$ |
3,506,089 |
|
|
$ |
6,945,082 |
|
|
$ |
4,482,262 |
|
|
$ |
5,901,954 |
|
|
$ |
4,320,500 |
|
Interest income
|
|
|
1,261,069 |
|
|
|
1,885,778 |
|
|
|
10,290,141 |
|
|
|
13,941,292 |
|
|
|
17,116,543 |
|
Brokered loan fees
|
|
|
2,182,779 |
|
|
|
777,694 |
|
|
|
1,437,664 |
|
|
|
2,496,492 |
|
|
|
2,000,233 |
|
Gain (loss) on sale of marketable securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
606,975 |
|
|
|
125,837 |
|
|
|
41,603 |
|
|
|
377,083 |
|
Miscellaneous income
|
|
|
15,769 |
|
|
|
30,208 |
|
|
|
49,620 |
|
|
|
51,428 |
|
|
|
114,052 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
|
6,965,706 |
|
|
|
10,245,737 |
|
|
|
16,385,524 |
|
|
|
22,432,769 |
|
|
|
23,928,411 |
|
Salaries, commissions and related expenses
|
|
|
2,719,178 |
|
|
|
4,171,660 |
|
|
|
4,503,571 |
|
|
|
5,723,911 |
|
|
|
7,142,761 |
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
608,611 |
|
|
|
1,123,686 |
|
|
|
5,465,192 |
|
|
|
8,815,029 |
|
|
|
11,689,738 |
|
Brokered loan expenses
|
|
|
1,284,219 |
|
|
|
835,303 |
|
|
|
1,016,930 |
|
|
|
2,139,881 |
|
|
|
1,519,490 |
|
General and administrative expenses
|
|
|
2,236,194 |
|
|
|
3,724,196 |
|
|
|
3,179,615 |
|
|
|
4,794,989 |
|
|
|
6,303,982 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total expenses
|
|
|
6,848,202 |
|
|
|
9,854,845 |
|
|
|
14,165,308 |
|
|
|
21,473,810 |
|
|
|
26,655,971 |
|
Income (loss) before provision for income taxes
|
|
|
117,504 |
|
|
|
390,892 |
|
|
|
2,220,216 |
|
|
|
958,959 |
|
|
|
(2,727,560 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax (expense) benefit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10,000 |
) |
|
|
231,653 |
|
|
|
1,037,881 |
|
|
|
2,690,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$ |
117,504 |
|
|
$ |
380,892 |
|
|
$ |
2,451,869 |
|
|
$ |
1,996,840 |
|
|
$ |
(37,560 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Per share basic income (loss)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
0.02 |
|
|
$ |
0.14 |
|
|
$ |
0.12 |
|
|
$ |
0.00 |
|
Per share diluted income (loss)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
0.02 |
|
|
$ |
0.14 |
|
|
$ |
0.12 |
|
|
$ |
0.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-33
NEW YORK MORTGAGE TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended | |
|
|
| |
|
|
Mar. 31, | |
|
Jun. 30, | |
|
Sep. 30, | |
|
Dec. 31, | |
|
|
2003 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain on sales of mortgage loans
|
|
$ |
4,757,862 |
|
|
$ |
6,790,049 |
|
|
$ |
6,854,729 |
|
|
$ |
4,628,029 |
|
Interest income
|
|
|
1,430,998 |
|
|
|
2,090,999 |
|
|
|
1,823,609 |
|
|
|
2,264,025 |
|
Brokered loan fees
|
|
|
1,285,767 |
|
|
|
1,580,880 |
|
|
|
1,512,505 |
|
|
|
2,303,419 |
|
Miscellaneous income
|
|
|
34,191 |
|
|
|
(4,727 |
) |
|
|
84,390 |
|
|
|
(68,275 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
|
7,508,818 |
|
|
|
10,457,201 |
|
|
|
10,275,233 |
|
|
|
9,127,198 |
|
Salaries, commissions and related expenses
|
|
|
1,721,318 |
|
|
|
2,133,344 |
|
|
|
2,762,371 |
|
|
|
2,629,836 |
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
651,504 |
|
|
|
807,448 |
|
|
|
1,198,381 |
|
|
|
609,105 |
|
Brokered loan expenses
|
|
|
863,114 |
|
|
|
1,159,493 |
|
|
|
926,099 |
|
|
|
784,960 |
|
General and administrative expenses
|
|
|
1,344,442 |
|
|
|
1,593,577 |
|
|
|
1,887,704 |
|
|
|
2,569,678 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total expenses
|
|
|
4,580,378 |
|
|
|
5,693,862 |
|
|
|
6,774,555 |
|
|
|
6,593,579 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$ |
2,928,440 |
|
|
$ |
4,763,339 |
|
|
$ |
3,500,678 |
|
|
$ |
2,533,619 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-34
No
dealer, salesperson or other individual has been authorized to
give any information or to make any representations other than
those contained in this Prospectus in connection with the offer
made by this Prospectus and, if given or made, such information
or representations must not be relied upon as having been
authorized by us or the Underwriters. This Prospectus does not
constitute an offer to sell or a solicitation of an offer to buy
any securities in any jurisdiction in which such offer or
solicitation is not authorized or in which the person making
such offer or solicitation is not qualified to do so, or to any
person to whom it is unlawful to make such offer or
solicitation. Neither the delivery of this Prospectus nor any
sale made hereunder shall, under any circumstances, create any
implication that there has been no change in our affairs or that
information contained herein is correct as of any time
subsequent to the date hereof.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
6,000,000 Shares of
Common Stock
PROSPECTUS
Friedman Billings
Ramsey
JPMorgan
,
2005
PART II
INFORMATION NOT REQUIRED IN PROSPECTUS
|
|
Item 31. |
Other Expenses of Issuance and Distribution. |
The following table sets forth the costs and expense payable by
the Registrant in connection with the issuance and distribution
of common stock being registered. All amounts are estimates.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount To Be Paid | |
|
|
| |
SEC registration fee
|
|
$ |
7,894 |
|
NASD fee
|
|
$ |
7,207 |
|
NYSE listing fees
|
|
$ |
|
|
Transfer agent and registrar fees
|
|
$ |
|
|
Legal fees and expenses
|
|
$ |
|
|
Accounting fees and expenses
|
|
$ |
|
|
Printing and mailing fees
|
|
$ |
|
|
Premiums for directors and officers insurance
|
|
$ |
|
|
Miscellaneous
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
Item 32. |
Sales to Special Parties. |
Not applicable.
|
|
Item 34. |
Indemnification of Officers and Directors. |
Maryland law permits a Maryland corporation to include in its
charter a provision limiting the liability of its directors and
officers to the corporation and its stockholders for money
damages except for liability resulting from (a) actual
receipt of an improper benefit or profit in money, property or
services or (b) active and deliberate dishonesty
established by a final judgment as being material to the cause
of action. Our charter contains such a provision which
eliminates directors and officers liability to the
maximum extent permitted by Maryland law.
Our charter authorizes us, to the maximum extent permitted by
Maryland law, to obligate us to indemnify any present or former
director or officer or any individual who, while a director or
officer of us and at the request of us, serves or has served
another corporation, real estate investment trust, partnership,
joint venture, trust, employee benefit plan or other enterprise
as a director, officer, partner or trustee, from and against any
claim or liability to which that individual may become subject
or which that individual may incur by reason of his or her
status as a present or former director or officer of us and to
pay or reimburse his or her reasonable expenses in advance of
final disposition of a proceeding. Our bylaws obligate us, to
the maximum extent permitted by Maryland law, to indemnify any
present or former director or officer or any individual who,
while a director or officer of us and at the request of us,
serves or has served another corporation, real estate investment
trust, partnership, joint venture, trust, employee benefit plan
or other enterprise as a director, officer, partner or trustee
and who is made a party to the proceeding by reason of his
service in that capacity from and against any claim or liability
to which that individual may become subject or which that
individual may incur by reason of his or her status as a present
or former director or officer of us and to pay or reimburse his
or her reasonable expenses in advance of final disposition of a
proceeding. The charter and bylaws also permit us to indemnify
and advance expenses to any individual who served a predecessor
of us in any of the capacities described above and any employee
or agent of us or a predecessor of us.
Maryland law requires a corporation (unless its charter provides
otherwise, which our charter does not) to indemnify a director
or officer who has been successful in the defense of any
proceeding to which he is made a party by reason of his service
in that capacity. Maryland law permits a corporation to
indemnify its present and
II-1
former directors and officers, among others, against judgments,
penalties, fines, settlements and reasonable expenses actually
incurred by them in connection with any proceeding to which they
may be made a party by reason of their service in those or other
capacities unless it is established that (a) the act or
omission of the director or officer was material to the matter
giving rise to the proceeding and (i) was committed in bad
faith or (ii) was the result of active and deliberate
dishonesty, (b) the director or officer actually received
an improper personal benefit in money, property or services or
(c) in the case of any criminal proceeding, the director or
officer had reasonable cause to believe that the act or omission
was unlawful. However, under Maryland law, a Maryland
corporation may not indemnify for an adverse judgment in a suit
by or in the right of the corporation or for a judgment of
liability on the basis that personal benefit was improperly
received, unless in either case a court orders indemnification
and then only for expenses. In addition, Maryland law permits a
corporation to advance reasonable expenses to a director or
officer upon the corporations receipt of (a) a
written affirmation by the director or officer of his or her
good faith belief that he or she has met the standard of conduct
necessary for indemnification by the corporation and (b) a
written undertaking by him or her or on his or her behalf to
repay the amount paid or reimbursed by the corporation if it is
ultimately determined that the standard of conduct was not met.
|
|
Item 35. |
Treatment of Proceeds from Stock Being Registered. |
Not applicable.
|
|
Item 36. |
Financial Statements and Exhibits. |
(a) Financial Statements included in the prospectus.
(b) Exhibits
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
Number |
|
Exhibit Title |
|
|
|
|
1.01 |
|
|
Form of Underwriting Agreement,
dated , 2005, by and among New
York Mortgage Trust, Inc., Friedman, Billings, Ramsey &
Co., Inc. and JP Morgan Securities Inc. |
|
3.01 |
|
|
Articles of Amendment and Restatement of New York Mortgage
Trust, Inc.****** |
|
3.02 |
|
|
Bylaws of New York Mortgage Trust, Inc.****** |
|
4.01 |
|
|
Form of Common Stock Certificate.****** |
|
5.01 |
|
|
Opinion of Venable LLP, with respect to the legality of the
shares being registered. |
|
8.01 |
|
|
Opinion of Hunton & Williams LLP with respect to tax
matters. |
|
10.01 |
|
|
Promissory Note, issued by The New York Mortgage Company, LLC on
August 31, 2003, as amended and restated, on
December 23, 2003, in the principal amount of
$2,574,352.00, payable to Joseph V. Fierro.* |
|
10.02 |
|
|
Promissory Note, issued by The New York Mortgage Company, LLC on
August 31, 2003, as amended and restated, on
December 23, 2003, in the principal amount of
$12,132,550.00 payable to Steven B. Schnall.* |
|
10.03 |
|
|
Master Repurchase Agreement between Credit Suisse First Boston
Mortgage Capital LLC, The New York Mortgage Company, LLC, Steven
B. Schnall and Joseph V. Fierro, dated October 2, 2002.* |
|
10.04 |
|
|
Amendment No. 1 to Master Repurchase Agreement between
Credit Suisse First Boston Mortgage Capital LLC, The New York
Mortgage Company, LLC, Steven B. Schnall and Joseph V. Fierro,
dated December 4, 2002.* |
|
10.05 |
|
|
Amendment No. 2 to Master Repurchase Agreement between
Credit Suisse First Boston Mortgage Capital LLC, The New York
Mortgage Company, LLC, Steven B. Schnall and Joseph V. Fierro,
dated February 20, 2003.* |
|
10.06 |
|
|
Amendment No. 3 to Master Repurchase Agreement between
Credit Suisse First Boston Mortgage Capital LLC, The New York
Mortgage Company, LLC, Steven B. Schnall and Joseph V. Fierro,
dated April 22, 2003.* |
II-2
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
Number |
|
Exhibit Title |
|
|
|
|
10.07 |
|
|
Amendment No. 4 to Master Repurchase Agreement between
Credit Suisse First Boston Mortgage Capital LLC, The New York
Mortgage Company, LLC, Steven B. Schnall and Joseph V. Fierro,
dated July 1, 2003.* |
|
10.08 |
|
|
Amendment No. 5 to Master Repurchase Agreement between
Credit Suisse First Boston Mortgage Capital LLC, The New York
Mortgage Company, LLC, Steven B. Schnall and Joseph V. Fierro,
dated July 7, 2003.* |
|
10.09 |
|
|
Amendment No. 6 to Master Repurchase Agreement between
Credit Suisse First Boston Mortgage Capital LLC, The New York
Mortgage Company, LLC, Steven B. Schnall and Joseph V. Fierro,
dated July 31, 2003.* |
|
10.10 |
|
|
Amendment No. 7 to Master Repurchase Agreement between
Credit Suisse First Boston Mortgage Capital LLC, The New York
Mortgage Company, LLC, Steven B. Schnall and Joseph V. Fierro,
dated August 4, 2003.* |
|
10.11 |
|
|
Amendment No. 8 to Master Repurchase Agreement between
Credit Suisse First Boston Mortgage Capital LLC, The New York
Mortgage Company, LLC, Steven B. Schnall and Joseph V. Fierro,
dated August 9, 2003.* |
|
10.12 |
|
|
Amendment No. 9 to Master Repurchase Agreement between
Credit Suisse First Boston Mortgage Capital LLC, The New York
Mortgage Company, LLC, Steven B. Schnall and Joseph V. Fierro,
dated August 28, 2003.* |
|
10.13 |
|
|
Amendment No. 10 to Master Repurchase Agreement between
Credit Suisse First Boston Mortgage Capital LLC, The New York
Mortgage Company, LLC, Steven B. Schnall and Joseph V. Fierro,
dated September 17, 2003.* |
|
10.14 |
|
|
Amendment No. 11 to Master Repurchase Agreement between
Credit Suisse First Boston Mortgage Capital LLC, The New York
Mortgage Company, LLC, Steven B. Schnall and Joseph V. Fierro,
dated October 1, 2003.* |
|
10.15 |
|
|
Amendment No. 12 to Master Repurchase Agreement between
Credit Suisse First Boston Mortgage Capital LLC, The New York
Mortgage Company, LLC, Steven B. Schnall and Joseph V. Fierro,
dated October 31, 2003.* |
|
10.16 |
|
|
Amendment No. 13 to Master Repurchase Agreement between
Credit Suisse First Boston Mortgage Capital LLC, The New York
Mortgage Company, LLC, Steven B. Schnall and Joseph V. Fierro,
dated December 19, 2003.* |
|
10.17 |
|
|
Credit Note between HSBC Bank USA and The New York Mortgage
Company LLC, dated as of March 30, 2001.* |
|
10.18 |
|
|
Credit and Security Agreement between HSBC Bank USA and The New
York Mortgage Company LLC, dated as of March 30, 2001.* |
|
10.19 |
|
|
First Amended Credit Note, dated as of May 24, 2001,
between HSBC Bank USA and The New York Mortgage Company LLC,
dated as of March 30, 2001.* |
|
10.20 |
|
|
First Amended Credit and Security Agreement, dated as of
May 24, 2001, between HSBC Bank USA and The New York
Mortgage Company LLC, dated as of March 30, 2001.* |
|
10.21 |
|
|
Second Amended Credit Note, dated as of June 18, 2001,
between HSBC Bank USA and The New York Mortgage Company LLC,
dated as of March 30, 2001.* |
|
10.22 |
|
|
Second Amended Credit and Security Agreement, dated
June 18, 2001, between HSBC Bank USA and The New York
Mortgage Company LLC, dated as of March 30, 2001.* |
|
10.23 |
|
|
Third Amended Credit Note, dated as of November 13, 2001,
between HSBC Bank USA and The New York Mortgage Company LLC,
dated as of March 30, 2001.* |
|
10.24 |
|
|
Third Amended Credit and Security Agreement, dated as of
November 13, 2001, between HSBC Bank USA and The New York
Mortgage Company LLC, dated as of March 30, 2001.* |
|
10.25 |
|
|
Fourth Amended Credit Note, dated as of January 16, 2002,
between HSBC Bank USA and The New York Mortgage Company LLC,
dated as of March 30, 2001.* |
|
10.26 |
|
|
Fourth Amended Credit and Security Agreement, dated as of
January 16, 2002, between HSBC Bank USA and The New York
Mortgage Company LLC, dated as of March 30, 2001.* |
II-3
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
Number |
|
Exhibit Title |
|
|
|
|
10.27 |
|
|
Fifth Amended Credit Note, dated as of April 29, 2002,
between HSBC Bank USA and The New York Mortgage Company LLC,
dated as of March 30, 2001.* |
|
10.28 |
|
|
Fifth Amended Credit and Security Agreement, dated as of
April 29, 2002, between HSBC Bank USA and The New York
Mortgage Company LLC, dated as of March 30, 2001.* |
|
10.29 |
|
|
Extension Letter, dated August 26, 2002, to Credit and
Security Agreement between HSBC Bank USA and The New York
Mortgage Company LLC, dated as of March 30, 2001, as
amended.* |
|
10.30 |
|
|
Extension Letter, dated September 11, 2002, to Credit and
Security Agreement between HSBC Bank USA and The New York
Mortgage Company LLC, dated as of March 30, 2001, as
amended.* |
|
10.31 |
|
|
Extension Letter, dated October 28, 2002, to Credit and
Security Agreement between HSBC Bank USA and The New York
Mortgage Company LLC, dated as of March 30, 2001, as
amended.* |
|
10.32 |
|
|
Extension Letter, dated November 27, 2002, to Credit and
Security Agreement between HSBC Bank USA and The New York
Mortgage Company LLC, dated as of March 30, 2001, as
amended.* |
|
10.33 |
|
|
Extension Letter, dated April 15, 2003, to Credit and
Security Agreement between HSBC Bank USA and The New York
Mortgage Company LLC, dated as of March 30, 2001, as
amended.* |
|
10.34 |
|
|
Extension Letter, dated June 24, 2003, to Credit and
Security Agreement between HSBC Bank USA and The New York
Mortgage Company LLC, dated as of March 30, 2001, as
amended.* |
|
10.35 |
|
|
Guaranty between HSBC Bank USA, The New York Mortgage Company
LLC and Steven Schnall, dated as of March 30, 2001.** |
|
10.36 |
|
|
Guaranty between HSBC Bank USA, The New York Mortgage Company
LLC and Joseph V. Fierro, dated as of March 30, 2001.** |
|
10.37 |
|
|
First Amended Guaranty between HSBC Bank USA, The New York
Mortgage Company LLC and Steven Schnall, dated as of
May 24, 2001.* |
|
10.38 |
|
|
First Amended Guaranty between HSBC Bank USA, The New York
Mortgage Company LLC and Joseph V. Fierro, dated as of
May 24, 2001.* |
|
10.39 |
|
|
Warehousing Credit Agreement, among The New York Mortgage
Company LLC, Steven B. Schnall, Joseph V. Fierro and National
City Bank of Kentucky, dated January 25, 2002.* |
|
10.40 |
|
|
First Amendment, dated April 2002, to Warehousing Credit
Agreement, among The New York Mortgage Company LLC, Steven B.
Schnall, Joseph V. Fierro and National City Bank of Kentucky,
dated January 25, 2002.* |
|
10.41 |
|
|
Second Amendment, dated June 3, 2002, to Warehousing Credit
Agreement, among The New York Mortgage Company LLC, Steven B.
Schnall, Joseph V. Fierro and National City Bank of Kentucky,
dated January 25, 2002.* |
|
10.42 |
|
|
Third Amendment, dated November , 2002, to
Warehousing Credit Agreement, among The New York Mortgage
Company LLC, Steven B. Schnall, Joseph V. Fierro and National
City Bank of Kentucky, dated January 25, 2002.* |
|
10.43 |
|
|
Fourth Amendment, dated June 15, 2003, to Warehousing
Credit Agreement, among The New York Mortgage Company LLC,
Steven B. Schnall, Joseph V. Fierro and National City Bank of
Kentucky, dated January 25, 2002.* |
|
10.44 |
|
|
Warehouse Promissory Note, between The New York Mortgage
Company, LLC and National City Bank of Kentucky, dated
January 25, 2002.* |
|
10.45 |
|
|
Amended and Restated Warehouse Promissory Note, between The New
York Mortgage Company, LLC and National City Bank of Kentucky,
dated June 3, 2002.* |
|
10.46 |
|
|
Warehousing Credit Agreement, between New York Mortgage Company,
LLC, Steven B. Schnall, Joseph V. Fierro and National City Bank
of Kentucky, dated as of January 25, 2002.* |
|
10.47 |
|
|
Pledge and Security Agreement, between The New York Mortgage
Company, LLC and National City Bank of Kentucky, dated as of
January 25, 2002.* |
|
10.48 |
|
|
Unconditional and Continuing Guaranty of Payment by Steven B.
Schnall to National City Bank of Kentucky, dated
January 25, 2002.* |
II-4
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
Number |
|
Exhibit Title |
|
|
|
|
10.49 |
|
|
Unconditional and Continuing Guaranty of Payment by Joseph V.
Fierro to National City Bank of Kentucky, dated January 25,
2002.* |
|
10.50 |
|
|
Amended and Restated Unconditional and Continuing Guaranty of
Payment by Steven B. Schnall to National City Bank of Kentucky,
dated June 15, 2003.* |
|
10.51 |
|
|
Amended and Restated Unconditional and Continuing Guaranty of
Payment by Joseph V. Fierro to National City Bank of Kentucky,
dated June 15, 2003.* |
|
10.52 |
|
|
Inter-Creditor Agreement, between National City Bank of Kentucky
and HSBC Bank USA, dated January 25, 2002.* |
|
10.53 |
|
|
Whole Loan Purchase and Sale Agreement/Mortgage Loan Purchase
and Sale Agreement between The New York Mortgage Company, LLC
and Greenwich Capital Financial Products, Inc., dated as of
September 1, 2003.* |
|
10.54 |
|
|
Whole Loan Custodial Agreement/Custodial Agreement between
Greenwich Capital Financial Products, Inc., The New York
Mortgage Company, LLC and LaSalle Bank National Association,
dated as of September 1, 2003.* |
|
10.55 |
|
|
Form of New York Mortgage Trust, Inc. 2004 Stock Incentive
Plan.*** |
|
10.56 |
|
|
Contribution Agreement by and among Steven B. Schnall and Joseph
V. Fierro and New York Mortgage Trust, Inc., dated
December 22, 2003.** |
|
10.57 |
|
|
Agreement by and among New York Mortgage Trust, Inc., The New
York Mortgage Company, LLC, Steven B. Schnall and Joseph V.
Fierro, dated December 23, 2003.** |
|
10.58 |
|
|
Sixth Amended Credit and Security Agreement, dated as of
August 11, 2003, between HSBC Bank USA and The New York
Mortgage Company LLC, dated as of March 30, 2001.** |
|
10.59 |
|
|
Temporary Overadvance Note, dated as of August 11, 2003,
between HSBC Bank USA and The New York Mortgage Company LLC.** |
|
10.60 |
|
|
Second Amended Guaranty between HSBC Bank USA, The New York
Mortgage Company LLC and Steven Schnall, dated as of
June 18, 2001.** |
|
10.61 |
|
|
Second Amended Guaranty between HSBC Bank USA, The New York
Mortgage Company LLC and Joseph V. Fierro, dated as of
June 18, 2001.** |
|
10.62 |
|
|
Third Amended Guaranty between HSBC Bank USA, The New York
Mortgage Company LLC and Steven Schnall, dated as of
November 13, 2001.** |
|
10.63 |
|
|
Third Amended Guaranty between HSBC Bank USA, The New York
Mortgage Company LLC and Joseph V. Fierro, dated as of
November 13, 2001.** |
|
10.64 |
|
|
Fourth Amended Guaranty between HSBC Bank USA, The New York
Mortgage Company LLC and Steven Schnall, dated as of
January 16, 2002.** |
|
10.65 |
|
|
Fourth Amended Guaranty between HSBC Bank USA, The New York
Mortgage Company LLC and Joseph V. Fierro, dated as of
January 16, 2002.** |
|
10.66 |
|
|
Fifth Amended Guaranty between HSBC Bank USA, The New York
Mortgage Company LLC and Steven Schnall, dated as of
April 29, 2002.** |
|
10.67 |
|
|
Fifth Amended Guaranty between HSBC Bank USA, The New York
Mortgage Company LLC and Joseph V. Fierro, dated as of
April 29, 2002.** |
|
10.68 |
|
|
Sixth Amended Guaranty between HSBC Bank USA, The New York
Mortgage Company LLC and Steven Schnall, dated as of
August 11, 2003.** |
|
10.69 |
|
|
Sixth Amended Guaranty between HSBC Bank USA, The New York
Mortgage Company LLC and Joseph V. Fierro, dated as of
August 11, 2003.** |
|
10.70 |
|
|
Credit and Security Agreement by and among HSBC Bank USA,
National City Bank of Kentucky and The New York Mortgage Company
LLC, dated as of December 15, 2003.** |
|
10.71 |
|
|
Guaranty between HSBC Bank USA, National City Bank of Kentucky,
The New York Mortgage Company LLC and Steven B. Schnall, dated
as of December 15, 2003.** |
|
10.72 |
|
|
Guaranty between HSBC Bank USA, National City Bank of Kentucky,
The New York Mortgage Company LLC and Joseph V. Fierro, dated as
of December 15, 2003.** |
II-5
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
Number |
|
Exhibit Title |
|
|
|
|
10.73 |
|
|
Credit Note by and between HSBC Bank USA and The New York
Mortgage Company LLC, dated as of December 15, 2003.** |
|
10.74 |
|
|
Credit Note by and between National City Bank of Kentucky and
The New York Mortgage Company LLC, dated as of December 15,
2003.** |
|
10.75 |
|
|
Swingline Note by and between HSBC Bank USA and The New York
Mortgage Company LLC, dated as of December 15, 2003.** |
|
10.76 |
|
|
Custodial Agreement by and among Greenwich Capital Financial
Products, Inc., The New York Mortgage Corporation LLC and
Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, dated as of August 1,
2003.** |
|
10.77 |
|
|
Master Mortgage Loan Purchase and Interim Servicing Agreement by
and between The New York Mortgage Company L.L.C. and Greenwich
Capital Financial Products, Inc., dated as of August 1,
2003.** |
|
10.78 |
|
|
Subordination and Pledge Agreement by and between HSBC Bank USA
and Steven B. Schnall, dated as of December 15, 2003.** |
|
10.79 |
|
|
Subordination and Pledge Agreement by and between HSBC Bank USA
and Joseph V. Fierro, dated as of December 15, 2003.** |
|
10.80 |
|
|
Second Amended and Restated Promissory Note, issued by The New
York Mortgage Company, LLC on August 31, 2003, as further
amended and restated, on December 23, 2003 and
February 26, 2004, in the principal amount of $11,432,550
payable to Steven B. Schnall.*** |
|
10.81 |
|
|
Second Amended and Restated Promissory Note, issued by The New
York Mortgage Company, LLC on August 31, 2003, as further
amended and restated, on December 23, 2003 and
February 26, 2004, in the principal amount of $2,274,352,
payable to Joseph V. Fierro.*** |
|
10.82 |
|
|
Promissory Note, issued by New York Mortgage Funding, LLC on
January 9, 2004 in the principal amount of $100,000,000.00,
payable to Greenwich Capital Financial Products, Inc.*** |
|
10.83 |
|
|
Guaranty between the New York Mortgage Company, LLC and
Greenwich Capital Financial Products, Inc., dated as of
January 9, 2004.*** |
|
10.84 |
|
|
Master Loan and Security Agreement between New York Mortgage
Funding, LLC and Greenwich Capital Financial Products, Inc.,
dated as of January 9, 2004.*** |
|
10.85 |
|
|
Custodial Agreement between New York Mortgage Funding, LLC,
Deutche Bank Trust Company Americas and Greenwich Capital
Financial Products, Inc., dated as of January 9, 2004.*** |
|
10.86 |
|
|
Amendment Number One, dated November 24, 2003, to the
Master Mortgage Loan Purchase and Interim Servicing Agreement,
dated as of August 1, 2003.*** |
|
10.87 |
|
|
Amended and Restated Contribution Agreement, by and among Steven
B. Schnall, Steven B. Schnall Annuity Trust U/A 3/25/04, Joseph
V. Fierro, 2004 Joseph V. Fierro Grantor Retained Annuity Trust
and New York Mortgage Trust, Inc., dated March 25, 2004.*** |
|
10.88 |
|
|
Second Amended and Restated Contribution Agreement, by and among
Steven B. Schnall, Steven B. Schnall Annuity Trust U/A 3/25/04,
Joseph V. Fierro, 2004 Joseph V. Fierro Grantor Retained Annuity
Trust and New York Mortgage Trust, Inc., dated April 29,
2004.**** |
|
10.89 |
|
|
Amended and Restated Agreement by and among New York Mortgage
Trust, Inc., The New York Mortgage Company, LLC, Steven B.
Schnall and Joseph V. Fierro, dated April 29, 2004.**** |
|
10.90 |
|
|
Third Amended and Restated Promissory Note, issued by The New
York Mortgage Company, LLC on August 31, 2003, as further
amended and restated on December 23, 2003,
February 26, 2004 and May 26, 2004, in the principal
amount of $11,432,550 payable to Steven B. Schnall.***** |
|
10.91 |
|
|
Third Amended and Restated Promissory Note, issued by the New
York Mortgage Company, LLC on August 31, 2003, as further
amended and restated, on December 23, 2003,
February 26, 2004 and May 26, 2004, in the principal
amount of $2,274,352 payable to Joseph V. Fierro. ***** |
|
10.92 |
|
|
Form of Employment Agreement between New York Mortgage Trust,
Inc. and Steven B. Schnall.****** |
|
10.93 |
|
|
Form of Employment Agreement between New York Mortgage Trust,
Inc. and David A. Akre.****** |
II-6
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
Number |
|
Exhibit Title |
|
|
|
|
10.94 |
|
|
Form of Employment Agreement between New York Mortgage Trust,
Inc. and Raymond A. Redlingshafer, Jr.****** |
|
10.95 |
|
|
Form of Employment Agreement between New York Mortgage Trust,
Inc. and Michael I. Wirth.****** |
|
10.96 |
|
|
Form of Employment Agreement between New York Mortgage Trust,
Inc. and Joseph V. Fierro.****** |
|
10.97 |
|
|
Form of Employment Agreement between New York Mortgage Trust,
Inc. and Steven R. Mumma.****** |
|
10.98 |
|
|
Amendment No. 1 to Employment Agreement between New York
Mortgage Trust, Inc. and Steven R. Mumma dated
December 2, 2004.******** |
|
10.99 |
|
|
Amendment and Restated Credit and Security Agreement between
HSBC Bank USA, National Association, National City Bank of
Kentucky, JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. and The New York Mortgage
Company, LLC, dated as of February 1, 2005.******** |
|
10.100 |
|
|
Amended and Restated Master Loan and Security Agreement between
New York Mortgage Funding, LLC, The New York Mortgage Company,
LLC and New York Mortgage Trust, Inc., and Greenwich Capital
Financial Products, Inc., dated as of December 6,
2004.******** |
|
10.101 |
|
|
Amended and Restated Master Repurchase Agreement between New
York, Mortgage Trust, Inc., The New York, Mortgage Company, LLC,
New York Mortgage Funding, LLC and Credit Suisse First Boston
Capital LLC, dated as of March 30, 2005.********* |
|
10.102 |
|
|
New York Mortgage Trust, Inc. 2005 Stock Incentive Plan. |
|
21.01 |
|
|
List of Subsidiaries of the Registrant.** |
|
23.01 |
|
|
Consent of Venable LLP (included in its opinion filed as
Exhibit 5.01 hereto). |
|
23.02 |
|
|
Consent of Hunton & Williams LLP (included in its
opinion filed as Exhibit 8.01 hereto). |
|
23.03 |
|
|
Consent of Deloitte & Touche LLP. |
|
24.01 |
|
|
Power of Attorney (included on signature page of the
Registration Statement). |
|
|
|
|
|
Filed herewith. |
|
|
|
To be filed by amendment. |
|
* |
|
Previously filed as an exhibit to the Companys
Registration Statement on Form S-11, Registration
No. 333-111668, and incorporated by reference herein. |
|
** |
|
Previously filed as an exhibit to Amendment No. 1 to the
Companys Registration Statement on Form S-11,
Registration No. 333-111668, and incorporated by reference
herein. |
|
*** |
|
Previously filed as an exhibit to Amendment No. 2 to the
Companys Registration Statement on Form S-11,
Registration No. 333-111668, and incorporated by reference
herein. |
|
**** |
|
Previously filed as an exhibit to Amendment No. 4 to the
Companys Registration Statement on Form S-11,
Registration No. 333-111668, and incorporated by reference
herein. |
|
*****
|
|
Previously filed as an exhibit to Amendment No. 5 to the
Companys Registration Statement on Form S-11,
Registration No. 333-111668, and incorporated by reference
herein. |
|
******
|
|
Previously filed as an exhibit to Amendment No. 6 to the
Companys Registration Statement on Form S-11,
Registration No. 333-111668, and incorporated by reference
herein. |
|
*******
|
|
Previously filed as an exhibit to Amendment No. 7 to the
Companys Registration Statement on Form S-11,
Registration No. 333-111668, and incorporated by reference
herein. |
|
********
|
|
Previously filed as an exhibit to the Companys
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004, filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 31,
2005. |
|
*********
|
|
Previously filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Companys
Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on April 5, 2005. |
II-7
The undersigned Registrant hereby undertakes as follows:
|
|
|
(1) That, for purposes of determining any liability under
the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, the information omitted
from the form of prospectus filed as part of this registration
statement in reliance upon Rule 430A and contained in the
final prospectus filed by the registrant pursuant to
Rule 424(b)(1) or (4) or Rule 497(h) under the
Securities Act of 1933, as amended, shall be deemed to be part
of this registration statement as of the time it was declared
effective. |
|
|
(2) That, for the purpose of determining any liability
under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, each such
post-effective amendment shall be deemed to be a new
registration statement relating to the securities offered
herein, and the offering of such securities at that time shall
be deemed to be the initial bona fide offering thereof. |
|
|
(3) To remove from registration by means of a
post-effective amendment any of these securities being
registered which remain unsold at the termination of the
offering. |
|
|
(4) Insofar as indemnification for liabilities arising
under the Securities Act of 1933 may be permitted to director,
officers and controlling persons of the registrant pursuant to
the foregoing provisions, or otherwise, the registrant has been
advised that in the opinion of the Securities and Exchange
Commission such indemnification is against public policy as
expressed in the Act and is, therefore, unenforceable. In the
event that a claim for indemnification against such liabilities
(other than the payment by the registrant of expenses incurred
or paid by a director, officer or controlling person of the
registrant in the successful defense of any action, suit or
proceeding) is asserted by such director, officer or controlling
person in connection with the securities being registered, the
registrant will, unless in the opinion of its counsel the matter
has been settled by controlling precedent, submit to a court of
appropriate jurisdiction the question whether such
indemnification by it is against public policy as expressed in
the Act and will be governed by the final adjudication of such
issue. |
II-8
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, as
amended, the registrant certifies that it has reasonable grounds
to believe that it meets all of the requirements for filing on
Form S-11 and has duly caused this registration statement
to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly
authorized, in the City of New York, State of New York on
June 8, 2005.
|
|
|
NEW YORK MORTGAGE TRUST,
INC.
|
|
(Registrant) |
|
|
|
|
|
Name: Michael I. Wirth |
|
Title: Executive Vice President and Chief
Financial
Officer |
POWER OF ATTORNEY
KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that each person whose signature
appears below hereby constitutes and appoints Michael I. Wirth
and Steven B. Schnall and each of them, his true and lawful
attorney-in-fact and agent, with full power of substitution and
resubstitution, for him and in is name, place and stead, in any
and all capacities, to sign any and all amendments to this
registration statement, and any additional related registration
statement filed pursuant to Rule 462(b) under the
Securities Act of 1933, as amended (including post-effective
amendments to the registration statement and any such related
registration statements), and to file the same, with all
exhibits thereto, and any other documents in connection
therewith, granting unto said attorneys-in-fact and agents full
power and authority to do and perform each and every act and
thing requisite and necessary to be done in and about the
premises, as fully to all intents and purposes as he might or
could do in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all that
said attorneys-in-fact and agents, or their substitute or
substitutes, may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue
hereof.
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, as
amended, this registration statement has been signed by the
following persons in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Signature |
|
Title |
|
Date |
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Steven B. Schnall
Steven
B. Schnall |
|
Chairman of the Board and
Co-Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer) |
|
June 8, 2005 |
|
/s/ David A. Akre
David
A. Akre |
|
Director and
Co-Chief Executive Officer |
|
June 8, 2005 |
|
/s/ Michael I. Wirth
Michael
I. Wirth |
|
Chief Financial Officer, Vice President, Secretary and
Treasurer
(Principal Financial and
Accounting Officer) |
|
June 8, 2005 |
|
/s/ Raymond A.
Redlingshafer, Jr.
Raymond
A. Redlingshafer, Jr. |
|
Director President and Chief
Investment Officer |
|
June 8, 2005 |
|
David
R. Bock |
|
Director |
|
|
II-9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Signature |
|
Title |
|
Date |
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Alan L. Hainey
Alan
L. Hainey |
|
Director |
|
June 8, 2005 |
|
/s/ Steven G. Norcutt
Steven
G. Norcutt |
|
Director |
|
June 8, 2005 |
|
/s/ Mary Dwyer Pembroke
Mary
Dwyer Pembroke |
|
Director |
|
June 8, 2005 |
|
/s/ Jerome F. Sherman
Jerome
F. Sherman |
|
Director |
|
June 8, 2005 |
|
/s/ Thomas W. White
Thomas
W. White |
|
Director |
|
June 8, 2005 |
II-10
INDEX TO EXHIBITS
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
Number |
|
Exhibit Title |
|
|
|
|
1.01 |
|
|
Form of Underwriting Agreement,
dated ,
2005, by and among New York Mortgage Trust, Inc., Friedman,
Billings, Ramsey & Co., Inc. and JP Morgan Securities
Inc. |
|
3.01 |
|
|
Articles of Amendment and Restatement of New York Mortgage
Trust, Inc.****** |
|
3.02 |
|
|
Bylaws of New York Mortgage Trust, Inc.****** |
|
4.01 |
|
|
Form of Common Stock Certificate.****** |
|
5.01 |
|
|
Opinion of Venable LLP, with respect to the legality of the
shares being registered. |
|
8.01 |
|
|
Opinion of Hunton & Williams LLP with respect to tax
matters. |
|
10.01 |
|
|
Promissory Note, issued by The New York Mortgage Company, LLC on
August 31, 2003, as amended and restated, on
December 23, 2003, in the principal amount of
$2,574,352.00, payable to Joseph V. Fierro.* |
|
10.02 |
|
|
Promissory Note, issued by The New York Mortgage Company, LLC on
August 31, 2003, as amended and restated, on
December 23, 2003, in the principal amount of
$12,132,550.00 payable to Steven B. Schnall.* |
|
10.03 |
|
|
Master Repurchase Agreement between Credit Suisse First Boston
Mortgage Capital LLC, The New York Mortgage Company, LLC, Steven
B. Schnall and Joseph V. Fierro, dated October 2, 2002.* |
|
10.04 |
|
|
Amendment No. 1 to Master Repurchase Agreement between
Credit Suisse First Boston Mortgage Capital LLC, The New York
Mortgage Company, LLC, Steven B. Schnall and Joseph V. Fierro,
dated December 4, 2002.* |
|
10.05 |
|
|
Amendment No. 2 to Master Repurchase Agreement between
Credit Suisse First Boston Mortgage Capital LLC, The New York
Mortgage Company, LLC, Steven B. Schnall and Joseph V. Fierro,
dated February 20, 2003.* |
|
10.06 |
|
|
Amendment No. 3 to Master Repurchase Agreement between
Credit Suisse First Boston Mortgage Capital LLC, The New York
Mortgage Company, LLC, Steven B. Schnall and Joseph V. Fierro,
dated April 22, 2003.* |
|
10.07 |
|
|
Amendment No. 4 to Master Repurchase Agreement between
Credit Suisse First Boston Mortgage Capital LLC, The New York
Mortgage Company, LLC, Steven B. Schnall and Joseph V. Fierro,
dated July 1, 2003.* |
|
10.08 |
|
|
Amendment No. 5 to Master Repurchase Agreement between
Credit Suisse First Boston Mortgage Capital LLC, The New York
Mortgage Company, LLC, Steven B. Schnall and Joseph V. Fierro,
dated July 7, 2003.* |
|
10.09 |
|
|
Amendment No. 6 to Master Repurchase Agreement between
Credit Suisse First Boston Mortgage Capital LLC, The New York
Mortgage Company, LLC, Steven B. Schnall and Joseph V. Fierro,
dated July 31, 2003.* |
|
10.10 |
|
|
Amendment No. 7 to Master Repurchase Agreement between
Credit Suisse First Boston Mortgage Capital LLC, The New York
Mortgage Company, LLC, Steven B. Schnall and Joseph V. Fierro,
dated August 4, 2003.* |
|
10.11 |
|
|
Amendment No. 8 to Master Repurchase Agreement between
Credit Suisse First Boston Mortgage Capital LLC, The New York
Mortgage Company, LLC, Steven B. Schnall and Joseph V. Fierro,
dated August 9, 2003.* |
|
10.12 |
|
|
Amendment No. 9 to Master Repurchase Agreement between
Credit Suisse First Boston Mortgage Capital LLC, The New York
Mortgage Company, LLC, Steven B. Schnall and Joseph V. Fierro,
dated August 28, 2003.* |
|
10.13 |
|
|
Amendment No. 10 to Master Repurchase Agreement between
Credit Suisse First Boston Mortgage Capital LLC, The New York
Mortgage Company, LLC, Steven B. Schnall and Joseph V. Fierro,
dated September 17, 2003.* |
|
10.14 |
|
|
Amendment No. 11 to Master Repurchase Agreement between
Credit Suisse First Boston Mortgage Capital LLC, The New York
Mortgage Company, LLC, Steven B. Schnall and Joseph V. Fierro,
dated October 1, 2003.* |
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
Number |
|
Exhibit Title |
|
|
|
|
10.15 |
|
|
Amendment No. 12 to Master Repurchase Agreement between
Credit Suisse First Boston Mortgage Capital LLC, The New York
Mortgage Company, LLC, Steven B. Schnall and Joseph V. Fierro,
dated October 31, 2003.* |
|
10.16 |
|
|
Amendment No. 13 to Master Repurchase Agreement between
Credit Suisse First Boston Mortgage Capital LLC, The New York
Mortgage Company, LLC, Steven B. Schnall and Joseph V. Fierro,
dated December 19, 2003.* |
|
10.17 |
|
|
Credit Note between HSBC Bank USA and The New York Mortgage
Company LLC, dated as of March 30, 2001.* |
|
10.18 |
|
|
Credit and Security Agreement between HSBC Bank USA and The New
York Mortgage Company LLC, dated as of March 30, 2001.* |
|
10.19 |
|
|
First Amended Credit Note, dated as of May 24, 2001,
between HSBC Bank USA and The New York Mortgage Company LLC,
dated as of March 30, 2001.* |
|
10.20 |
|
|
First Amended Credit and Security Agreement, dated as of
May 24, 2001, between HSBC Bank USA and The New York
Mortgage Company LLC, dated as of March 30, 2001.* |
|
10.21 |
|
|
Second Amended Credit Note, dated as of June 18, 2001,
between HSBC Bank USA and The New York Mortgage Company LLC,
dated as of March 30, 2001.* |
|
10.22 |
|
|
Second Amended Credit and Security Agreement, dated
June 18, 2001, between HSBC Bank USA and The New York
Mortgage Company LLC, dated as of March 30, 2001.* |
|
10.23 |
|
|
Third Amended Credit Note, dated as of November 13, 2001,
between HSBC Bank USA and The New York Mortgage Company LLC,
dated as of March 30, 2001.* |
|
10.24 |
|
|
Third Amended Credit and Security Agreement, dated as of
November 13, 2001, between HSBC Bank USA and The New York
Mortgage Company LLC, dated as of March 30, 2001.* |
|
10.25 |
|
|
Fourth Amended Credit Note, dated as of January 16, 2002,
between HSBC Bank USA and The New York Mortgage Company LLC,
dated as of March 30, 2001.* |
|
10.26 |
|
|
Fourth Amended Credit and Security Agreement, dated as of
January 16, 2002, between HSBC Bank USA and The New York
Mortgage Company LLC, dated as of March 30, 2001.* |
|
10.27 |
|
|
Fifth Amended Credit Note, dated as of April 29, 2002,
between HSBC Bank USA and The New York Mortgage Company LLC,
dated as of March 30, 2001.* |
|
10.28 |
|
|
Fifth Amended Credit and Security Agreement, dated as of
April 29, 2002, between HSBC Bank USA and The New York
Mortgage Company LLC, dated as of March 30, 2001.* |
|
10.29 |
|
|
Extension Letter, dated August 26, 2002, to Credit and
Security Agreement between HSBC Bank USA and The New York
Mortgage Company LLC, dated as of March 30, 2001, as
amended.* |
|
10.30 |
|
|
Extension Letter, dated September 11, 2002, to Credit and
Security Agreement between HSBC Bank USA and The New York
Mortgage Company LLC, dated as of March 30, 2001, as
amended.* |
|
10.31 |
|
|
Extension Letter, dated October 28, 2002, to Credit and
Security Agreement between HSBC Bank USA and The New York
Mortgage Company LLC, dated as of March 30, 2001, as
amended.* |
|
10.32 |
|
|
Extension Letter, dated November 27, 2002, to Credit and
Security Agreement between HSBC Bank USA and The New York
Mortgage Company LLC, dated as of March 30, 2001, as
amended.* |
|
10.33 |
|
|
Extension Letter, dated April 15, 2003, to Credit and
Security Agreement between HSBC Bank USA and The New York
Mortgage Company LLC, dated as of March 30, 2001, as
amended.* |
|
10.34 |
|
|
Extension Letter, dated June 24, 2003, to Credit and
Security Agreement between HSBC Bank USA and The New York
Mortgage Company LLC, dated as of March 30, 2001, as
amended.* |
|
10.35 |
|
|
Guaranty between HSBC Bank USA, The New York Mortgage Company
LLC and Steven Schnall, dated as of March 30, 2001.** |
|
10.36 |
|
|
Guaranty between HSBC Bank USA, The New York Mortgage Company
LLC and Joseph V. Fierro, dated as of March 30, 2001.** |
|
10.37 |
|
|
First Amended Guaranty between HSBC Bank USA, The New York
Mortgage Company LLC and Steven Schnall, dated as of
May 24, 2001.* |
|
10.38 |
|
|
First Amended Guaranty between HSBC Bank USA, The New York
Mortgage Company LLC and Joseph V. Fierro, dated as of
May 24, 2001.* |
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
Number |
|
Exhibit Title |
|
|
|
|
10.39 |
|
|
Warehousing Credit Agreement, among The New York Mortgage
Company LLC, Steven B. Schnall, Joseph V. Fierro and National
City Bank of Kentucky, dated January 25, 2002.* |
|
10.40 |
|
|
First Amendment, dated April 2002, to Warehousing Credit
Agreement, among The New York Mortgage Company LLC, Steven B.
Schnall, Joseph V. Fierro and National City Bank of Kentucky,
dated January 25, 2002.* |
|
10.41 |
|
|
Second Amendment, dated June 3, 2002, to Warehousing Credit
Agreement, among The New York Mortgage Company LLC, Steven B.
Schnall, Joseph V. Fierro and National City Bank of Kentucky,
dated January 25, 2002.* |
|
10.42 |
|
|
Third Amendment, dated November , 2002, to
Warehousing Credit Agreement, among The New York Mortgage
Company LLC, Steven B. Schnall, Joseph V. Fierro and National
City Bank of Kentucky, dated January 25, 2002.* |
|
10.43 |
|
|
Fourth Amendment, dated June 15, 2003, to Warehousing
Credit Agreement, among The New York Mortgage Company LLC,
Steven B. Schnall, Joseph V. Fierro and National City Bank of
Kentucky, dated January 25, 2002.* |
|
10.44 |
|
|
Warehouse Promissory Note, between The New York Mortgage
Company, LLC and National City Bank of Kentucky, dated
January 25, 2002.* |
|
10.45 |
|
|
Amended and Restated Warehouse Promissory Note, between The New
York Mortgage Company, LLC and National City Bank of Kentucky,
dated June 3, 2002.* |
|
10.46 |
|
|
Warehousing Credit Agreement, between New York Mortgage Company,
LLC, Steven B. Schnall, Joseph V. Fierro and National City Bank
of Kentucky, dated as of January 25, 2002.* |
|
10.47 |
|
|
Pledge and Security Agreement, between The New York Mortgage
Company, LLC and National City Bank of Kentucky, dated as of
January 25, 2002.* |
|
10.48 |
|
|
Unconditional and Continuing Guaranty of Payment by Steven B.
Schnall to National City Bank of Kentucky, dated
January 25, 2002.* |
|
10.49 |
|
|
Unconditional and Continuing Guaranty of Payment by Joseph V.
Fierro to National City Bank of Kentucky, dated January 25,
2002.* |
|
10.50 |
|
|
Amended and Restated Unconditional and Continuing Guaranty of
Payment by Steven B. Schnall to National City Bank of Kentucky,
dated June 15, 2003.* |
|
10.51 |
|
|
Amended and Restated Unconditional and Continuing Guaranty of
Payment by Joseph V. Fierro to National City Bank of Kentucky,
dated June 15, 2003.* |
|
10.52 |
|
|
Inter-Creditor Agreement, between National City Bank of Kentucky
and HSBC Bank USA, dated January 25, 2002.* |
|
10.53 |
|
|
Whole Loan Purchase and Sale Agreement/Mortgage Loan Purchase
and Sale Agreement between The New York Mortgage Company, LLC
and Greenwich Capital Financial Products, Inc., dated as of
September 1, 2003.* |
|
10.54 |
|
|
Whole Loan Custodial Agreement/Custodial Agreement between
Greenwich Capital Financial Products, Inc., The New York
Mortgage Company, LLC and LaSalle Bank National Association,
dated as of September 1, 2003.* |
|
10.55 |
|
|
Form of New York Mortgage Trust, Inc. 2004 Stock Incentive
Plan.*** |
|
10.56 |
|
|
Contribution Agreement by and among Steven B. Schnall and Joseph
V. Fierro and New York Mortgage Trust, Inc., dated
December 22, 2003.** |
|
10.57 |
|
|
Agreement by and among New York Mortgage Trust, Inc., The New
York Mortgage Company, LLC, Steven B. Schnall and Joseph V.
Fierro, dated December 23, 2003.** |
|
10.58 |
|
|
Sixth Amended Credit and Security Agreement, dated as of
August 11, 2003, between HSBC Bank USA and The New York
Mortgage Company LLC, dated as of March 30, 2001.** |
|
10.59 |
|
|
Temporary Overadvance Note, dated as of August 11, 2003,
between HSBC Bank USA and The New York Mortgage Company LLC.** |
|
10.60 |
|
|
Second Amended Guaranty between HSBC Bank USA, The New York
Mortgage Company LLC and Steven Schnall, dated as of
June 18, 2001.** |
|
10.61 |
|
|
Second Amended Guaranty between HSBC Bank USA, The New York
Mortgage Company LLC and Joseph V. Fierro, dated as of
June 18, 2001.** |
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
Number |
|
Exhibit Title |
|
|
|
|
10.62 |
|
|
Third Amended Guaranty between HSBC Bank USA, The New York
Mortgage Company LLC and Steven Schnall, dated as of
November 13, 2001.** |
|
10.63 |
|
|
Third Amended Guaranty between HSBC Bank USA, The New York
Mortgage Company LLC and Joseph V. Fierro, dated as of
November 13, 2001.** |
|
10.64 |
|
|
Fourth Amended Guaranty between HSBC Bank USA, The New York
Mortgage Company LLC and Steven Schnall, dated as of
January 16, 2002.** |
|
10.65 |
|
|
Fourth Amended Guaranty between HSBC Bank USA, The New York
Mortgage Company LLC and Joseph V. Fierro, dated as of
January 16, 2002.** |
|
10.66 |
|
|
Fifth Amended Guaranty between HSBC Bank USA, The New York
Mortgage Company LLC and Steven Schnall, dated as of
April 29, 2002.** |
|
10.67 |
|
|
Fifth Amended Guaranty between HSBC Bank USA, The New York
Mortgage Company LLC and Joseph V. Fierro, dated as of
April 29, 2002.** |
|
10.68 |
|
|
Sixth Amended Guaranty between HSBC Bank USA, The New York
Mortgage Company LLC and Steven Schnall, dated as of
August 11, 2003.** |
|
10.69 |
|
|
Sixth Amended Guaranty between HSBC Bank USA, The New York
Mortgage Company LLC and Joseph V. Fierro, dated as of
August 11, 2003.** |
|
10.70 |
|
|
Credit and Security Agreement by and among HSBC Bank USA,
National City Bank of Kentucky and The New York Mortgage Company
LLC, dated as of December 15, 2003.** |
|
10.71 |
|
|
Guaranty between HSBC Bank USA, National City Bank of Kentucky,
The New York Mortgage Company LLC and Steven B. Schnall, dated
as of December 15, 2003.** |
|
10.72 |
|
|
Guaranty between HSBC Bank USA, National City Bank of Kentucky,
The New York Mortgage Company LLC and Joseph V. Fierro, dated as
of December 15, 2003.** |
|
10.73 |
|
|
Credit Note by and between HSBC Bank USA and The New York
Mortgage Company LLC, dated as of December 15, 2003.** |
|
10.74 |
|
|
Credit Note by and between National City Bank of Kentucky and
The New York Mortgage Company LLC, dated as of December 15,
2003.** |
|
10.75 |
|
|
Swingline Note by and between HSBC Bank USA and The New York
Mortgage Company LLC, dated as of December 15, 2003.** |
|
10.76 |
|
|
Custodial Agreement by and among Greenwich Capital Financial
Products, Inc., The New York Mortgage Corporation LLC and
Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, dated as of August 1,
2003.** |
|
10.77 |
|
|
Master Mortgage Loan Purchase and Interim Servicing Agreement by
and between The New York Mortgage Company L.L.C. and Greenwich
Capital Financial Products, Inc., dated as of August 1,
2003.** |
|
10.78 |
|
|
Subordination and Pledge Agreement by and between HSBC Bank USA
and Steven B. Schnall, dated as of December 15, 2003.** |
|
10.79 |
|
|
Subordination and Pledge Agreement by and between HSBC Bank USA
and Joseph V. Fierro, dated as of December 15, 2003.** |
|
10.80 |
|
|
Second Amended and Restated Promissory Note, issued by The New
York Mortgage Company, LLC on August 31, 2003, as further
amended and restated, on December 23, 2003 and
February 26, 2004, in the principal amount of $11,432,550
payable to Steven B. Schnall.*** |
|
10.81 |
|
|
Second Amended and Restated Promissory Note, issued by The New
York Mortgage Company, LLC on August 31, 2003, as further
amended and restated, on December 23, 2003 and
February 26, 2004, in the principal amount of $2,274,352,
payable to Joseph V. Fierro.*** |
|
10.82 |
|
|
Promissory Note, issued by New York Mortgage Funding, LLC on
January 9, 2004 in the principal amount of $100,000,000.00,
payable to Greenwich Capital Financial Products, Inc.*** |
|
10.83 |
|
|
Guaranty between the New York Mortgage Company, LLC and
Greenwich Capital Financial Products, Inc., dated as of
January 9, 2004.*** |
|
10.84 |
|
|
Master Loan and Security Agreement between New York Mortgage
Funding, LLC and Greenwich Capital Financial Products, Inc.,
dated as of January 9, 2004.*** |
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
Number |
|
Exhibit Title |
|
|
|
|
10.85 |
|
|
Custodial Agreement between New York Mortgage Funding, LLC,
Deutche Bank Trust Company Americas and Greenwich Capital
Financial Products, Inc., dated as of January 9, 2004.*** |
|
10.86 |
|
|
Amendment Number One, dated November 24, 2003, to the
Master Mortgage Loan Purchase and Interim Servicing Agreement,
dated as of August 1, 2003.*** |
|
10.87 |
|
|
Amended and Restated Contribution Agreement, by and among Steven
B. Schnall, Steven B. Schnall Annuity Trust U/A 3/25/04, Joseph
V. Fierro, 2004 Joseph V. Fierro Grantor Retained Annuity Trust
and New York Mortgage Trust, Inc., dated March 25, 2004.*** |
|
10.88 |
|
|
Second Amended and Restated Contribution Agreement, by and among
Steven B. Schnall, Steven B. Schnall Annuity Trust U/A 3/25/04,
Joseph V. Fierro, 2004 Joseph V. Fierro Grantor Retained Annuity
Trust and New York Mortgage Trust, Inc., dated April 29,
2004.**** |
|
10.89 |
|
|
Amended and Restated Agreement by and among New York Mortgage
Trust, Inc., The New York Mortgage Company, LLC, Steven B.
Schnall and Joseph V. Fierro, dated April 29, 2004.**** |
|
10.90 |
|
|
Third Amended and Restated Promissory Note, issued by The New
York Mortgage Company, LLC on August 31, 2003, as further
amended and restated on December 23, 2003,
February 26, 2004 and May 26, 2004, in the principal
amount of $11,432,550 payable to Steven B. Schnall.***** |
|
10.91 |
|
|
Third Amended and Restated Promissory Note, issued by the New
York Mortgage Company, LLC on August 31, 2003, as further
amended and restated, on December 23, 2003,
February 26, 2004 and May 26, 2004, in the principal
amount of $2,274,352 payable to Joseph V. Fierro. ***** |
|
10.92 |
|
|
Form of Employment Agreement between New York Mortgage Trust,
Inc. and Steven B. Schnall.****** |
|
10.93 |
|
|
Form of Employment Agreement between New York Mortgage Trust,
Inc. and David A. Akre.****** |
|
10.94 |
|
|
Form of Employment Agreement between New York Mortgage Trust,
Inc. and Raymond A. Redlingshafer, Jr.****** |
|
10.95 |
|
|
Form of Employment Agreement between New York Mortgage Trust,
Inc. and Michael I. Wirth.****** |
|
10.96 |
|
|
Form of Employment Agreement between New York Mortgage Trust,
Inc. and Joseph V. Fierro.****** |
|
10.97 |
|
|
Form of Employment Agreement between New York Mortgage Trust,
Inc. and Steven R. Mumma.****** |
|
10.98 |
|
|
Amendment No. 1 to Employment Agreement between New York
Mortgage Trust, Inc. and Steven R. Mumma dated
December 2, 2004.******** |
|
10.99 |
|
|
Amendment and Restated Credit and Security Agreement between
HSBC Bank USA, National Association, National City Bank of
Kentucky, JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. and The New York Mortgage
Company, LLC, dated as of February 1, 2005.******** |
|
10.100 |
|
|
Amended and Restated Master Loan and Security Agreement between
New York Mortgage Funding, LLC, The New York Mortgage Company,
LLC and New York Mortgage Trust, Inc., and Greenwich Capital
Financial Products, Inc., dated as of December 6,
2004.******** |
|
10.101 |
|
|
Amended and Restated Master Repurchase Agreement between New
York, Mortgage Trust, Inc., The New York, Mortgage Company, LLC,
New York Mortgage Funding, LLC and Credit Suisse First Boston
Capital LLC, dated as of March 30, 2005.********* |
|
10.102 |
|
|
New York Mortgage Trust, Inc. 2005 Stock Incentive Plan. |
|
21.01 |
|
|
List of Subsidiaries of the Registrant.** |
|
23.01 |
|
|
Consent of Venable LLP (included in its opinion filed as
Exhibit 5.01 hereto). |
|
23.02 |
|
|
Consent of Hunton & Williams LLP (included in its
opinion filed as Exhibit 8.01 hereto). |
|
23.03 |
|
|
Consent of Deloitte & Touche LLP. |
|
24.01 |
|
|
Power of Attorney (included on signature page of the
Registration Statement). |
|
|
|
|
|
Filed herewith. |
|
|
|
To be filed by amendment. |
|
|
|
* |
|
Previously filed as an exhibit to the Companys
Registration Statement on Form S-11, Registration
No. 333-111668, and incorporated by reference herein. |
|
|
|
** |
|
Previously filed as an exhibit to Amendment No. 1 to the
Companys Registration Statement on Form S-11,
Registration No. 333-111668, and incorporated by reference
herein. |
|
*** |
|
Previously filed as an exhibit to Amendment No. 2 to the
Companys Registration Statement on Form S-11,
Registration No. 333-111668, and incorporated by reference
herein. |
|
**** |
|
Previously filed as an exhibit to Amendment No. 4 to the
Companys Registration Statement on Form S-11,
Registration No. 333-111668, and incorporated by reference
herein. |
|
*****
|
|
Previously filed as an exhibit to Amendment No. 5 to the
Companys Registration Statement on Form S-11,
Registration No. 333-111668, and incorporated by reference
herein. |
|
******
|
|
Previously filed as an exhibit to Amendment No. 6 to the
Companys Registration Statement on Form S-11,
Registration No. 333-111668, and incorporated by reference
herein. |
|
*******
|
|
Previously filed as an exhibit to Amendment No. 7 to the
Companys Registration Statement on Form S-11,
Registration No. 333-111668, and incorporated by reference
herein. |
|
********
|
|
Previously filed as an exhibit to the Companys
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004, filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 31,
2005. |
|
*********
|
|
Previously filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Companys
Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on April 5, 2005. |