UNITED STATES | ||
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION | ||
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549 | ||
FORM 10-Q | ||
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the Quarterly Period Ended March 31, 2015 |
Commission File Number 1-9750 |
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) | ||
Delaware | 38-2478409 | |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) | (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) | |
1334 York Avenue New York, New York | 10021 | |
(Address of principal executive offices) | (Zip Code) | |
Registrant's telephone number, including area code: (212) 606-7000 | ||
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ý No ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of the Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes ý No ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer | ý | Accelerated filer | ¨ | |
Non-accelerated filer | ¨ | (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) | Smaller reporting company | ¨ |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes ¨ No ý
As of April 30, 2015, there were 69,488,135 outstanding shares of Common Stock, par value $0.01 per share, of the registrant.
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PAGE | ||
2#
PART I: FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1: FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
SOTHEBY’S
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(UNAUDITED)
(Thousands of dollars, except per share data)
Three Months Ended | ||||||||
March 31, 2015 | March 31, 2014 | |||||||
Revenues: | ||||||||
Agency | $ | 127,882 | $ | 123,128 | ||||
Principal | 12,983 | 26,001 | ||||||
Finance | 12,687 | 5,682 | ||||||
License fees | 1,974 | 1,697 | ||||||
Other | 149 | 303 | ||||||
Total revenues | 155,675 | 156,811 | ||||||
Expenses: | ||||||||
Agency direct costs | 11,839 | 10,437 | ||||||
Cost of Principal revenues | 11,713 | 24,502 | ||||||
Cost of Finance revenues | 3,388 | 710 | ||||||
Marketing | 4,060 | 3,133 | ||||||
Salaries and related | 62,930 | 65,756 | ||||||
General and administrative | 34,729 | 37,332 | ||||||
Depreciation and amortization | 4,782 | 5,147 | ||||||
CEO separation and transition costs (see Note 13) | 4,189 | — | ||||||
Restructuring charges, net (see Note 14) | (359 | ) | — | |||||
Special charges (see Note 15) | — | 5,703 | ||||||
Total expenses | 137,271 | 152,720 | ||||||
Operating income | 18,404 | 4,091 | ||||||
Interest income | 129 | 416 | ||||||
Interest expense | (8,661 | ) | (8,783 | ) | ||||
Other expense | (1,959 | ) | (1,442 | ) | ||||
Income (loss) before taxes | 7,913 | (5,718 | ) | |||||
Equity in earnings of investees | 1,144 | 154 | ||||||
Income tax expense | 3,924 | 331 | ||||||
Net income (loss) | 5,133 | (5,895 | ) | |||||
Less: Net (loss) income attributable to noncontrolling interest | (69 | ) | 219 | |||||
Net income (loss) attributable to Sotheby's | $ | 5,202 | $ | (6,114 | ) | |||
Basic and diluted earnings (loss) per share - Sotheby’s common shareholders | $ | 0.07 | $ | (0.09 | ) | |||
Weighted average basic shares outstanding | 69,090 | 69,143 | ||||||
Weighted average diluted shares outstanding | 69,705 | 69,143 | ||||||
Cash dividends declared per common share | $ | 0.10 | $ | 4.44 | ||||
See accompanying Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
3#
SOTHEBY’S
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE LOSS
(UNAUDITED)
(Thousands of dollars)
Three Months Ended | ||||||||
March 31, 2015 | March 31, 2014 | |||||||
Net income (loss) | $ | 5,133 | $ | (5,895 | ) | |||
Other comprehensive (loss) income: | ||||||||
Cumulative foreign currency translation adjustments, net of tax of ($1,667) and ($477) | (19,269 | ) | 1,468 | |||||
Reclassification of cumulative translation adjustment included in net income (loss) | — | 2,058 | ||||||
Amortization of previously unrecognized net pension losses and prior service costs included in net income (loss), net of tax of $215 and $117 | 858 | 472 | ||||||
Other comprehensive (loss) income | (18,411 | ) | 3,998 | |||||
Comprehensive loss | (13,278 | ) | (1,897 | ) | ||||
Less: Comprehensive (loss) income attributable to noncontrolling interest | (69 | ) | 219 | |||||
Comprehensive loss attributable to Sotheby's | $ | (13,209 | ) | $ | (2,116 | ) | ||
See accompanying Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
4#
SOTHEBY’S CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (UNAUDITED) (Thousands of dollars) | ||||||||||||
March 31, 2015 | December 31, 2014 | March 31, 2014 | ||||||||||
A S S E T S | ||||||||||||
Current Assets: | ||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 381,065 | $ | 693,829 | $ | 322,218 | ||||||
Restricted cash | 11,467 | 32,837 | 17,495 | |||||||||
Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $7,198, $7,318, and $7,030 | 476,228 | 913,743 | 522,886 | |||||||||
Notes receivable, net of allowance for credit losses of $1,252, $1,166, and $1,821 | 83,564 | 130,796 | 163,443 | |||||||||
Inventory | 258,828 | 217,132 | 177,639 | |||||||||
Deferred income taxes and income tax receivable | 33,158 | 17,078 | 31,766 | |||||||||
Prepaid expenses and other current assets | 37,470 | 34,107 | 39,034 | |||||||||
Total Current Assets | 1,281,780 | 2,039,522 | 1,274,481 | |||||||||
Notes receivable | 671,595 | 568,942 | 315,067 | |||||||||
Fixed assets, net of accumulated depreciation and amortization of $192,048, $191,260, and $182,178 | 357,498 | 364,382 | 375,779 | |||||||||
Goodwill and other intangible assets, net of accumulated amortization of $5,062, $5,760, and $6,463 | 13,905 | 14,341 | 14,870 | |||||||||
Equity method investments | 41,476 | 10,210 | 10,744 | |||||||||
Deferred income taxes and income tax receivable | 31,999 | 38,202 | 48,395 | |||||||||
Trust assets related to deferred compensation liability | 50,684 | 50,490 | 52,984 | |||||||||
Pension asset | 28,664 | 28,993 | 38,997 | |||||||||
Other long-term assets | 19,317 | 19,738 | 19,421 | |||||||||
Total Assets | $ | 2,496,918 | $ | 3,134,820 | $ | 2,150,738 | ||||||
L I A B I L I T I E S A N D S H A R E H O L D E R S’ E Q U I T Y | ||||||||||||
Current Liabilities: | ||||||||||||
Due to consignors | $ | 401,560 | $ | 980,470 | $ | 413,641 | ||||||
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities | 86,318 | 111,639 | 97,202 | |||||||||
Accrued salaries and related costs | 30,862 | 88,915 | 30,186 | |||||||||
York Property Mortgage | 218,642 | 218,728 | 3,581 | |||||||||
Accrued and deferred income taxes | 8,776 | 13,828 | 14,421 | |||||||||
Other current liabilities | 13,137 | 15,627 | 11,814 | |||||||||
Total Current Liabilities | 759,295 | 1,429,207 | 570,845 | |||||||||
Credit facility borrowings | 501,500 | 445,000 | 185,000 | |||||||||
Long-term debt, net | 300,000 | 300,000 | 515,161 | |||||||||
Accrued and deferred income taxes | 18,963 | 21,192 | 19,949 | |||||||||
Deferred compensation liability | 50,326 | 49,633 | 52,081 | |||||||||
Other long-term liabilities | 8,800 | 11,550 | 11,244 | |||||||||
Total Liabilities | 1,638,884 | 2,256,582 | 1,354,280 | |||||||||
Commitments and contingencies (see Note 9) | ||||||||||||
Shareholders’ Equity: | ||||||||||||
Common Stock, $0.01 par value | 700 | 695 | 695 | |||||||||
Authorized shares—200,000,000 | ||||||||||||
Issued shares—70,046,306, 69,550,073, and 69,494,869 | ||||||||||||
Outstanding shares—69,488,135, 68,991,902, and 68,936,698 | ||||||||||||
Additional paid-in capital | 408,938 | 408,874 | 388,530 | |||||||||
Treasury stock, at cost: 558,171 shares at March 31, 2015, December 31, 2014, and March 31, 2014 | (25,000 | ) | (25,000 | ) | (25,000 | ) | ||||||
Retained earnings | 568,105 | 569,894 | 467,130 | |||||||||
Accumulated other comprehensive loss | (95,177 | ) | (76,766 | ) | (35,455 | ) | ||||||
Total Shareholders’ Equity | 857,566 | 877,697 | 795,900 | |||||||||
Noncontrolling interest | 468 | 541 | 558 | |||||||||
Total Equity | 858,034 | 878,238 | 796,458 | |||||||||
Total Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity | $ | 2,496,918 | $ | 3,134,820 | $ | 2,150,738 | ||||||
See accompanying Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
5#
SOTHEBY’S CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (UNAUDITED) (Thousands of dollars) | ||||||||
Three Months Ended | ||||||||
March 31, 2015 | March 31, 2014 | |||||||
Operating Activities: | ||||||||
Net income (loss) attributable to Sotheby's | $ | 5,202 | $ | (6,114 | ) | |||
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) attributable to Sotheby's to net cash used by operating activities: | ||||||||
Depreciation and amortization | 4,782 | 5,147 | ||||||
Loss from cumulative translation adjustment upon liquidation of foreign subsidiary | — | 2,058 | ||||||
Deferred income tax expense | 4,685 | 415 | ||||||
Share-based payments | 7,653 | 6,247 | ||||||
Net pension cost (benefit) | 390 | (173 | ) | |||||
Inventory writedowns and bad debt provisions | 3,175 | 1,309 | ||||||
Amortization of debt discount | 891 | 891 | ||||||
Excess tax benefits from share-based payments | (1,086 | ) | (3,121 | ) | ||||
Other | (1,236 | ) | 894 | |||||
Changes in assets and liabilities: | ||||||||
Accounts receivable | 427,023 | 340,957 | ||||||
Due to consignors | (574,931 | ) | (524,796 | ) | ||||
Inventory | (47,172 | ) | (1,587 | ) | ||||
Prepaid expenses and other current assets | (2,419 | ) | (7,313 | ) | ||||
Other long-term assets | (2 | ) | (2,259 | ) | ||||
Deferred income tax assets and income tax receivable | (12,878 | ) | (11,189 | ) | ||||
Accrued income taxes and deferred income tax liabilities | (7,030 | ) | (12,856 | ) | ||||
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities and other liabilities | (84,410 | ) | (56,642 | ) | ||||
Net cash used by operating activities | (277,363 | ) | (268,132 | ) | ||||
Investing Activities: | ||||||||
Funding of notes receivable | (125,714 | ) | (75,661 | ) | ||||
Collections of notes receivable | 74,186 | 88,730 | ||||||
Capital expenditures | (1,311 | ) | (2,210 | ) | ||||
Funding of equity method investment | (30,725 | ) | — | |||||
Distributions from equity investees | 600 | 575 | ||||||
Proceeds from the sale of equity method investment | 75 | 50 | ||||||
Decrease in restricted cash | 17,806 | 14,556 | ||||||
Net cash (used) provided by investing activities | (65,083 | ) | 26,040 | |||||
Financing Activities: | ||||||||
Proceeds from credit facility borrowings | 70,500 | 185,000 | ||||||
Repayments of credit facility borrowings | (14,000 | ) | — | |||||
Repayments of York Property Mortgage | (976 | ) | (927 | ) | ||||
Repurchase of common stock | — | (25,000 | ) | |||||
Dividends paid | (9,460 | ) | (310,809 | ) | ||||
Proceeds from exercise of employee stock options | — | 967 | ||||||
Excess tax benefits from share-based payments | 1,086 | 3,121 | ||||||
Funding of employee tax obligations upon the vesting of share-based payments | (8,897 | ) | (10,141 | ) | ||||
Net cash provided (used) by financing activities | 38,253 | (157,789 | ) | |||||
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents | (8,571 | ) | 784 | |||||
Decrease in cash and cash equivalents | (312,764 | ) | (399,097 | ) | ||||
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period | 693,829 | 721,315 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period | $ | 381,065 | $ | 322,218 | ||||
Supplemental information on non-cash investing and financing activities:
See Note 5 for information regarding non-cash transfers between Accounts Receivable (net) and Notes Receivable (net).
See accompanying Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
6#
SOTHEBY’S
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
1. Basis of Presentation
The Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements included herein have been prepared by Sotheby’s pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”). Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) in the United States of America (the “U.S.”) have been condensed or omitted from this report, as is permitted by such rules and regulations; however, the management of Sotheby’s believes that the disclosures herein are adequate to make the information presented not misleading and that all normal and recurring adjustments necessary for a fair presentation of the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements are reflected in the interim periods presented. It is suggested that these Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements be read in conjunction with the financial statements and notes thereto included in Sotheby’s 2014 Annual Report on Form 10-K.
The Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements include the accounts of Sotheby’s wholly-owned subsidiaries and Sotheby's Beijing Auction Co., Ltd ("Sotheby's Beijing"), a joint venture in which Sotheby's has a controlling 80% ownership interest. The net (loss) income attributable to the minority owner of Sotheby's Beijing is reported as "Net (Loss) Income Attributable to Noncontrolling Interest" in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations and the non-controlling 20% ownership interest is reported as "Noncontrolling Interest" within the Equity section of the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets.
Equity investments through which Sotheby’s exercises significant influence over the investee, but does not control, are accounted for using the equity method. Under the equity method, Sotheby’s share of investee earnings or losses is recorded within Equity in Earnings of Investees in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations. Sotheby’s interest in the net assets of the investee is recorded within Equity Method Investments on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets. Sotheby's equity method investees include Acquavella Modern Art and RM Sotheby's (see Note 7).
2. Seasonality of Business
The worldwide art auction market has two principal selling seasons, which generally occur in the second and fourth quarters of the year. In the aggregate, second and fourth quarter Net Auction Sales1 represented 79% and 83% of total Net Auction Sales in 2014 and 2013, respectively, with auction commission revenues comprising approximately 81% of Sotheby's total revenues in those years. Accordingly, Sotheby’s financial results are seasonal, with peak revenues and operating income generally occurring in the second and fourth quarters. Consequently, first and third quarter results have historically reflected lower revenues when compared to the second and fourth quarters and, typically, a net loss due to the fixed nature of many of Sotheby’s operating expenses.
3. Earnings (Loss) Per Share
Basic earnings (loss) per share—Basic earnings (loss) per share attributable to Sotheby's common shareholders is computed under the two-class method using the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. The two-class method requires that the amount of net income attributable to participating securities be deducted from consolidated net income in the computation of basic earnings per share. In periods with a net loss, the net loss attributable to participating securities is not deducted from consolidated net loss in the computation of basic loss per share as the impact would be anti-dilutive. Sotheby's participating securities include unvested restricted stock units and restricted stock shares, which have non-forfeitable rights to dividends. (See Note 12 for information on Sotheby's share-based payment programs.)
Diluted earnings (loss) per share—Diluted earnings (loss) per share attributable to Sotheby's common shareholders is computed in a similar manner to basic earnings (loss) per share under the two-class method, using the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period and, if dilutive, the weighted average number of potential common shares outstanding during the period. Sotheby's potential common shares currently include unvested performance share units held by employees, incremental common shares issuable upon the assumed exercise of employee stock options, and deferred stock units held by members of the Board of Directors. (See Note 12 for information on Sotheby's share-based payment programs.)
___________________________________________________________________
1 Net Auction Sales represents the hammer or sale price of property sold at auction.
7#
For the three months ended March 31, 2015, 1.3 million potential common shares related to unvested performance share units were excluded from the computation of diluted earnings per share because the profitability or stock price targets inherent in such awards were not achieved as of the balance sheet date. For the three months ended March 31, 2014, 2 million potential common shares were excluded from the computation of diluted earnings per share because Sotheby's reported a net loss for the period, and, therefore, their inclusion in the computation would be anti-dilutive.
The table below summarizes the computation of basic and diluted earnings (loss) per share for the three months ended March 31, 2015 and 2014 (in thousands, except per share amounts):
Three months ended March 31, | ||||||||
2015 | 2014 | |||||||
Basic: | ||||||||
Numerator: | ||||||||
Net income (loss) attributable to Sotheby’s | $ | 5,202 | $ | (6,114 | ) | |||
Less: Net income attributable to participating securities | 41 | — | ||||||
Net income (loss) attributable to Sotheby’s common shareholders | $ | 5,161 | $ | (6,114 | ) | |||
Denominator: | ||||||||
Weighted average basic shares outstanding | 69,090 | 69,143 | ||||||
Basic earnings (loss) per share - Sotheby’s common shareholders | $ | 0.07 | $ | (0.09 | ) | |||
Diluted: | ||||||||
Numerator: | ||||||||
Net income (loss) attributable to Sotheby’s | $ | 5,202 | $ | (6,114 | ) | |||
Less: Net income attributable to participating securities | 41 | — | ||||||
Net income (loss) attributable to Sotheby’s common shareholders | $ | 5,161 | $ | (6,114 | ) | |||
Denominator: | ||||||||
Weighted average common shares outstanding | 69,090 | 69,143 | ||||||
Weighted average effect of Sotheby's dilutive potential common shares: | ||||||||
Performance share units | 440 | — | ||||||
Deferred stock units | 155 | — | ||||||
Stock options | 20 | — | ||||||
Weighted average dilutive potential common shares outstanding | 615 | — | ||||||
Weighted average diluted shares outstanding | 69,705 | 69,143 | ||||||
Diluted earnings (loss) per share - Sotheby’s common shareholders | $ | 0.07 | $ | (0.09 | ) | |||
8#
4. Segment Reporting
Sotheby’s operations are organized under three segments—Agency, Principal, and Finance. The table below presents Sotheby’s revenues and (loss) income before taxes by segment for the three months ended March 31, 2015 and 2014 (in thousands of dollars):
Three months ended March 31, 2015 | Agency (a) | Principal | Finance (a) | All Other | Reconciling items (a) | Total | ||||||||||||||||||
Revenues | $ | 127,882 | $ | 12,983 | $ | 15,957 | $ | 2,123 | $ | (3,270 | ) | $ | 155,675 | |||||||||||
Segment (loss) income before taxes | $ | (382 | ) | $ | 1,123 | $ | 10,820 | $ | 1,685 | $ | (5,333 | ) | $ | 7,913 | ||||||||||
Three months ended March 31, 2014 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Revenues | $ | 123,128 | $ | 26,001 | $ | 8,947 | $ | 2,000 | $ | (3,265 | ) | $ | 156,811 | |||||||||||
Segment (loss) income before taxes | $ | (7,923 | ) | $ | 949 | $ | 5,896 | (b) | $ | 1,343 | $ | (5,983 | ) | $ | (5,718 | ) | ||||||||
(a) | The reconciling items related to Revenues consist principally of amounts charged by the Finance segment to the Agency segment, including interest and facility fees related to certain loans made to Agency segment clients, as well as, beginning on January 1, 2015, fees charged for term loan collateral sold at auction or privately through the Agency segment during the period. For the three months ended March 31, 2015, such fees totaled $1.9 million. Prior period segment results for the three months ended March 31, 2014 have been adjusted to include $0.7 million of such fees. Each of the individual reconciling items related to segment income (loss) before taxes are listed in the table below. |
(b) For the three months ended March 31, 2014, Finance segment income before taxes includes $1.1 million of intercompany charges from Sotheby's global treasury function.
For the three months ended March 31, 2015 and 2014, Agency segment revenues consist of the following (in thousands of dollars):
Three Months Ended March 31, | ||||||||
2015 | 2014 | |||||||
Auction commissions | $ | 113,015 | $ | 104,673 | ||||
Private sale commissions | 11,458 | 13,055 | ||||||
Auction guarantee and inventory activities | (751 | ) | 670 | |||||
Other Agency revenues (a) | 4,160 | 4,730 | ||||||
Total Agency segment revenues | $ | 127,882 | $ | 123,128 | ||||
(a) | Includes commissions and other fees earned by Sotheby's on sales brokered by third parties, fees charged to clients for catalogue production and insurance, catalogue subscription revenues, and advertising revenues. |
9#
The table below presents a reconciliation of segment income (loss) before taxes to consolidated income (loss) before taxes for the three months ended March 31, 2015 and 2014 (in thousands of dollars):
Three Months Ended March 31, | ||||||||
2015 | 2014 | |||||||
Agency | $ | (382 | ) | $ | (7,923 | ) | ||
Principal | 1,123 | 949 | ||||||
Finance | 10,820 | 5,896 | ||||||
All Other | 1,685 | 1,343 | ||||||
Segment income before taxes | 13,246 | 265 | ||||||
Reconciling items: | ||||||||
CEO separation and transition costs (see Note 13) | (4,189 | ) | — | |||||
Special charges (see Note 15) | — | (5,703 | ) | |||||
Equity in earnings of investees (a) | (1,144 | ) | (280 | ) | ||||
Income (loss) before taxes | $ | 7,913 | $ | (5,718 | ) | |||
(a) | In the table above, Sotheby's share of earnings related to its equity investees is included as part of the (loss) income before taxes of the Agency and Principal segments, but is presented as a separate component of net income (loss) in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations. For the three months ended March 31, 2015 and 2014, equity in earnings of investees related to the Principal segment was $0.4 million and $0.3 million, respectively. For the three months ended March 31, 2015, equity in earnings of investees related to the Agency segment was $0.7 million. |
The table below presents Sotheby's assets by segment, as well as a reconciliation of segment assets to consolidated assets as of March 31, 2015, December 31, 2014, and March 31, 2014 (in thousands of dollars):
March 31, 2015 | December 31, 2014 | March 31, 2014 | ||||||||||
Agency | $ | 1,652,272 | $ | 2,325,855 | $ | 1,477,104 | ||||||
Principal | 66,005 | 93,275 | 90,271 | |||||||||
Finance | 711,862 | 658,710 | 501,822 | |||||||||
All Other | 1,622 | 1,700 | 1,380 | |||||||||
Total segment assets | 2,431,761 | 3,079,540 | 2,070,577 | |||||||||
Unallocated amounts: | ||||||||||||
Deferred tax assets and income tax receivable | 65,157 | 55,280 | 80,161 | |||||||||
Consolidated assets | $ | 2,496,918 | $ | 3,134,820 | $ | 2,150,738 | ||||||
10#
5. Receivables
Accounts Receivable, Net—Through its Agency segment, Sotheby's accepts property on consignment and matches sellers, also known as consignors, to buyers through the auction or private sale process. Following an auction or private sale, Sotheby's invoices the buyer for the purchase price of the property (including any commissions owed by the buyer), collects payment from the buyer, and remits to the consignor the net sale proceeds after deducting its commissions, expenses and applicable taxes and royalties.
Under Sotheby’s standard auction payment terms, payments from buyers are due no more than 30 days from the sale date and payments to consignors are due 35 days from the sale date. For private sales, payment from the buyer is typically due on the sale date, with the net sale proceeds being due to the consignor shortly thereafter. Extended payment terms are sometimes provided to an auction or private sale buyer. For auctions, the extent to which extended payment terms are provided to buyers can vary considerably from selling season to selling season. Extended payment terms typically extend the payment due date to a date that is no longer than one year from the sale date. In limited circumstances, the payment due date may be extended to a date that is beyond one year from the sale date. All extended payment term arrangements are approved by management under Sotheby's internal corporate governance policy. When providing extended payment terms, Sotheby’s attempts to match the timing of cash receipt from the buyer with the timing of payment to the consignor, but is not always successful in doing so.
In the limited circumstances when the payment due date is extended to a date that is beyond one year from the sale date, if the consignor does not provide Sotheby's matched payment terms, the receivable balance is reclassified from Accounts Receivable to Notes Receivable in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets. As of March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014, Notes Receivable within the Agency segment included $22.9 million and $22.7 million, respectively, of amounts reclassified from Accounts Receivable. As of March 31, 2014, there were no such Notes Receivable outstanding. (See discussion of Agency segment Notes Receivable below.)
Under the standard terms and conditions of its auction and private sales, Sotheby’s is not obligated to pay the consignor for property that has not been paid for by the buyer. If a buyer defaults on payment, the sale may be cancelled, and the property will be returned to the consignor. Alternatively, the consignor may reoffer the property at a future Sotheby's auction or negotiate a private sale with Sotheby's acting as its agent. In certain instances and subject to management approval under Sotheby’s internal corporate governance policy, the consignor may be paid the net sale proceeds before payment is collected from the buyer and/or the buyer may be allowed to take possession of the property before making payment. In situations when the buyer takes possession of the property before making payment, Sotheby’s is liable to the seller for the net sales proceeds whether or not the buyer makes payment. As of March 31, 2015, December 31, 2014, and March 31, 2014, Accounts Receivable (net) included $134.2 million, $116 million, and $176.1 million, respectively, related to situations when Sotheby's paid the consignor all or a portion of the net sales proceeds before payment was collected from the buyer. As of March 31, 2015, December 31, 2014, and March 31, 2014, Accounts Receivable (net) also included $48.7 million, $96.5 million, and $92.1 million, respectively, related to situations when the buyer was allowed to take possession of the property before making payment to Sotheby’s.
11#
Notes Receivable, Net—As of March 31, 2015, December 31, 2014, and March 31, 2014, Notes Receivable (net) consisted of the following (in thousands of dollars):
March 31, 2015 | December 31, 2014 | March 31, 2014 | ||||||||||
Finance Segment: | ||||||||||||
Consignor advances | $ | 38,190 | $ | 25,994 | $ | 96,338 | ||||||
Term loans | 661,657 | 618,447 | 360,830 | |||||||||
Total - Finance segment (net) | 699,847 | 644,441 | 457,168 | |||||||||
Agency Segment: | ||||||||||||
Guarantee advances | 25,000 | 25,000 | 7,725 | |||||||||
Consignor advances | — | — | 3,000 | |||||||||
Other loans | 25,036 | 24,760 | 2,142 | |||||||||
Total - Agency segment | 50,036 | 49,760 | 12,867 | |||||||||
Principal Segment: | ||||||||||||
Secured loans | 2,626 | 2,812 | 5,525 | |||||||||
Other: | ||||||||||||
Unsecured loan | 2,650 | 2,725 | 2,950 | |||||||||
Total Notes Receivable (net) | $ | 755,159 | $ | 699,738 | $ | 478,510 | ||||||
Notes Receivable (Finance Segment)—The Finance segment provides certain collectors and art dealers with financing secured by works of art that Sotheby's either has in its possession or permits borrowers to possess. The Finance segment generally makes two types of secured loans: (1) advances secured by consigned property where the borrowers are contractually committed, in the near term, to sell the property through the Agency segment of Sotheby's (a “consignor advance”); and (2) general purpose term loans secured by property not presently intended for sale (a “term loan”).
Consignor advances allow sellers to receive funds upon consignment for an auction or private sale that will typically occur up to one year in the future and normally have short-term maturities. Term loans allow Sotheby's to establish or enhance mutually beneficial relationships with borrowers and may generate future auction or private sale consignments and/or purchases. Term loans normally have initial maturities of up to two years and typically carry a variable market rate of interest.
Prior to 2014, the lending activities of the Finance segment were funded primarily by the operating cash flows of the Agency segment, with the ability to supplement those cash flows with revolving credit facility borrowings. In January 2014, in order to reduce the Finance segment's cost of capital and enhance returns, Sotheby's established a separate capital structure for the Finance segment through which client loans are predominantly funded with borrowings drawn from a dedicated revolving credit facility. The establishment of the Finance segment's dedicated revolving credit facility in February 2014 has allowed management to debt fund a substantial portion of pre-existing loans and fund further growth of the loan portfolio. Cash balances are also used to fund a portion of the Finance segment loan portfolio, as appropriate. (See Note 6 for information related to the Finance segment's dedicated revolving credit facility.)
In certain situations, term loans are also made to refinance client auction and private sale purchases. For the three months ended March 31, 2015 and 2014, the Finance segment made $32.3 million and $7.1 million, respectively, of such loans. These loans are accounted for as non-cash transfers between Accounts Receivable (net) and Notes Receivable (net) and are, therefore, not reflected as the funding of Notes Receivable within investing activities in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows. Upon repayment, the cash received in settlement of such loans is classified within operating activities in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows. For the three months ended March 31, 2015 and 2014, such repayments totaled $10.7 million and $16.1 million, respectively. As of March 31, 2015, December 31, 2014, and March 31, 2014, Notes Receivable (net) included $112 million, $90.4 million, and $63.9 million, respectively, of such loans.
The collection of secured loans can be adversely impacted by a decline in the art market in general or in the value of the particular collateral. In addition, in situations when there are competing claims on the collateral and/or when a borrower becomes subject to bankruptcy or insolvency laws, Sotheby’s ability to realize on its collateral may be limited or delayed.
12#
Sotheby’s target loan-to-value (“LTV”) ratio, which is defined as the principal loan amount divided by the low auction estimate of the collateral, is 50%, but loans are routinely made with LTV ratios between 51% and 60% as the Finance segment credit facility permits borrowings on loans up to an LTV of 60%. In rare circumstances, loans are also made at an initial LTV ratio higher than 60%. The decision to make a loan with an LTV ratio above 50% is made by management based on an assessment of borrower credit risk. In addition, the LTV ratio of certain loans may increase above the 50% target due to decreases in the low auction estimates of the collateral. The revaluation of loan collateral is performed by Sotheby’s specialists on an annual basis or more frequently if there is a material change in circumstances related to the loan, the value of the collateral, the disposal plans for the collateral, or if an event of default occurs. Management believes that the LTV ratio is the critical credit quality indicator for Finance segment secured loans.
The table below provides the aggregate LTV ratio for the Finance segment loan portfolio as of March 31, 2015, December 31, 2014, and March 31, 2014 (in thousands of dollars):
March 31, 2015 | December 31, 2014 | March 31, 2014 | ||||||||||
Finance segment secured loans | $ | 699,847 | $ | 644,441 | $ | 457,168 | ||||||
Low auction estimate of collateral | $ | 1,444,468 | $ | 1,349,094 | $ | 1,075,376 | ||||||
Aggregate LTV ratio | 48 | % | 48 | % | 43 | % | ||||||
The table below provides the aggregate LTV ratio for Finance segment secured loans with an LTV ratio above 50% as of March 31, 2015, December 31, 2014, and March 31, 2014 (in thousands of dollars):
March 31, 2015 | December 31, 2014 | March 31, 2014 | ||||||||||
Finance segment secured loans with an LTV ratio above 50% | $ | 432,967 | $ | 329,135 | $ | 169,783 | ||||||
Low auction estimate of collateral related to Finance segment secured loans with an LTV ratio above 50% | $ | 781,387 | $ | 556,662 | $ | 268,621 | ||||||
Aggregate LTV ratio of Finance segment secured loans with an LTV ratio above 50% | 55 | % | 59 | % | 63 | % | ||||||
As of March 31, 2015, December 31, 2014, and March 31, 2014, the balance of Finance segment secured loans with an LTV ratio above 50% includes $334.5 million, $280.3 million, and $103.8 million, respectively, of loans with an LTV ratio between 51% and 60%.
The table below provides other credit quality information regarding Finance segment secured loans as of March 31, 2015, December 31, 2014, and March 31, 2014 (in thousands of dollars):
March 31, 2015 | December 31, 2014 | March 31, 2014 | ||||||||||
Total secured loans | $ | 699,847 | $ | 644,441 | $ | 457,168 | ||||||
Loans past due | $ | 16,269 | $ | 22,409 | $ | 18,791 | ||||||
Loans more than 90 days past due | $ | 10,000 | $ | — | $ | 12,483 | ||||||
Non-accrual loans | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | ||||||
Impaired loans | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | ||||||
Allowance for credit losses: | ||||||||||||
Allowance for credit losses for impaired loans | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | ||||||
Allowance for credit losses based on historical data | 1,252 | 1,166 | 1,821 | |||||||||
Total allowance for credit losses - secured loans | $ | 1,252 | $ | 1,166 | $ | 1,821 | ||||||
Management considers a loan to be past due when principal payments are not paid in accordance with the stated terms of the loan. As of March 31, 2015, $16.3 million of the Notes Receivable (net) balance was considered to be past due, of which $10 million was more than 90 days past due. The collateral securing these loans has low auction estimates of approximately $57 million and $43 million, respectively, resulting in aggregate LTV ratios of 29% and 23%, respectively. Sotheby's is continuing to accrue interest on these past due loans. In April 2015, $15.7 million of the past due loan balance was refinanced on terms favorable to Sotheby's, and $0.6 million was repaid with interest.
13#
A non-accrual loan is a loan for which future Finance revenue is not recorded due to management’s determination that it is probable that future interest on the loan is not collectible. Any cash receipts subsequently received on non-accrual loans are first applied to reduce the recorded principal balance of the loan, with any proceeds in excess of the principal balance then applied to interest owed by the borrower. The recognition of Finance revenue may resume on a non-accrual loan if sufficient additional collateral is provided by the borrower or if management becomes aware of other circumstances that indicate that it is probable that the borrower will make future interest payments on the loan. As of March 31, 2015, December 31, 2014, and March 31, 2014, there were no non-accrual loans outstanding.
A loan is considered to be impaired when management determines that it is probable that a portion of the principal and interest owed by the borrower will not be recovered after taking into account the estimated realizable value of the collateral securing the loan, as well as the ability of the borrower to repay any shortfall between the value of the collateral and the amount of the loan. If a loan is considered to be impaired, Finance Revenue is no longer recognized and bad debt expense is recorded for any principal or accrued interest that is deemed uncollectible. As of March 31, 2015, December 31, 2014, and March 31, 2014, there were no impaired loans outstanding.
During the period January 1, 2015 to March 31, 2015, activity related to the Allowance for Credit Losses was as follows (in thousands of dollars):
Allowance for credit losses as of January 1, 2015 | $ | 1,166 | |
Change in loan loss provision | 86 | ||
Allowance for credit losses as of March 31, 2015 | $ | 1,252 | |
As of March 31, 2015, unfunded commitments to extend additional credit through Sotheby's Finance segment were $30.2 million.
Notes Receivable (Agency Segment)—Sotheby’s is obligated under the terms of certain auction guarantees to advance a portion of the guaranteed amount prior to the auction. In addition, in certain limited situations, the Agency segment will provide consignor advances to clients. Such auction guarantee and consignor advances are recorded on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets within Notes Receivable (net). As of March 31, 2015, December 31, 2014, and March 31, 2014, auction guarantee advances totaled $25 million, $25 million, and $7.7 million, respectively. (See Note 10 for additional information related to auction guarantees.) As of March 31, 2014, Agency segment consignor advances totaled $3 million.
In the limited circumstances when the payment due date for an auction or private sale receivable is extended to a date that is beyond one year from the sale date, if the consignor does not provide Sotheby's matched payment terms, the receivable balance is reclassified from Accounts Receivable to Notes Receivable in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets. As of March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014, Notes Receivable within the Agency segment included $22.9 million and $22.7 million of amounts reclassified from Accounts Receivable against which Sotheby's held $3.7 million of collateral. As of March 31, 2014, there were no such Notes Receivable outstanding. These Notes Receivable are accounted for as non-cash transfers between Accounts Receivable (net) and Notes Receivable (net) and are, therefore, not reflected within Investing Activities in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows. Upon repayment, the cash received in settlement of such Notes Receivable is classified within Operating Activities in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows.
Under certain circumstances, Sotheby's, through its Agency segment, finances the purchase of works of art by unaffiliated art dealers through unsecured loans. As of March 31, 2015, December 31, 2014, and March 31, 2014, one such unsecured loan totaled $2.1 million. Sotheby's is no longer accruing interest with respect to this unsecured loan, but management believes that the $2.1 million balance is collectible based on discussions with the borrower.
Notes Receivable (Principal Segment)—Under certain circumstances, the Principal segment provides secured loans to certain art dealers to finance the purchase of works of art. In these situations, Sotheby's acquires a partial ownership interest in the purchased property in addition to providing the loan. Upon its eventual sale, the loan is repaid, and any profit or loss is shared by Sotheby's and the dealer according to their respective ownership interests. As of March 31, 2015, December 31, 2014, and March 31, 2014, such loans totaled $2.6 million, $2.8 million, and $5.5 million, respectively.
Notes Receivable (Other)—In the second quarter of 2013, Sotheby's sold its interest in an equity method investee for $4.3 million and, as a result, recognized a gain of $0.3 million. The sale price was funded by an upfront cash payment to Sotheby's of $0.8 million and the issuance of a $3.5 million unsecured loan. This loan matures in December 2018, is being charged a variable market rate of interest, and requires monthly payments during the loan term. As of March 31, 2015, December 31, 2014, and March 31, 2014 the carrying value of this loan was approximately $2.7 million, $2.7 million, and $3 million, respectively.
14#
6. Debt
Revolving Credit Facilities—Sotheby's has a credit agreement with an international syndicate of lenders led by General Electric Capital Corporation. This credit agreement provides for separate dedicated revolving credit facilities for the Agency segment (the “Agency Credit Agreement”) and the Finance segment (the “Finance Credit Agreement”) (collectively, the “Credit Agreements”). The Credit Agreements have a maturity date of August 22, 2019.
The Agency Credit Agreement provides for an asset-based revolving credit facility the proceeds of which may be used primarily for the working capital and other general corporate needs of the Agency segment. The Finance Credit Agreement provides for an asset-based revolving credit facility the proceeds of which may be used primarily for the working capital and other general corporate needs of the Finance segment, including the funding of client loans. The Credit Agreements allow Sotheby's to transfer the proceeds of borrowings under each of the revolving credit facilities between the Agency and Finance segments.
The maximum aggregate borrowing capacity of the Credit Agreements, which is subject to a borrowing base, is $850 million, with $300 million committed to the Agency segment and $550 million committed to the Finance segment. The borrowing capacity of the Credit Agreements includes a $50 million incremental revolving credit facility with higher advance rates against certain assets and higher commitment and borrowing costs (the "Incremental Facility"). The Incremental Facility has a maturity date of August 21, 2015, which may be extended for an additional 365 days on an annual basis with the consent of the lenders who agree to extend their commitments under the Incremental Facility.
The Credit Agreements have a sub-limit of $200 million for borrowings in the U.K. and Hong Kong, with up to $50 million available for foreign borrowings under the Agency Credit Agreement and up to $150 million available for foreign borrowings under the Finance Credit Agreement. The Credit Agreements also include an accordion feature, which allows Sotheby’s to seek an increase to the combined borrowing capacity of the Credit Agreements until February 23, 2019 by an amount not to exceed $100 million in the aggregate.
The borrowing base under the Agency Credit Agreement is determined by a calculation that is primarily based upon a percentage of the carrying values of certain auction guarantee advances, a percentage of the carrying value of certain inventory, a percentage of the carrying value of certain extended payment term receivables arising from auction or private sale transactions, and the fair value of certain of Sotheby's trademarks. The borrowing base under the Finance Credit Agreement is determined by a calculation that is primarily based upon a percentage of the carrying values of certain loans in the Finance segment loan portfolio and the fair value of certain of Sotheby's trademarks.
The obligations under the Credit Agreements are cross-guaranteed and cross-collateralized. Domestic borrowers are jointly and severally liable for all obligations under the Credit Agreements and, subject to certain limitations, borrowers in the U.K. and Sotheby's Hong Kong Limited, are jointly and severally liable for all obligations of the foreign borrowers under the Credit Agreements. In addition, the obligations of the borrowers under the Credit Agreements are guaranteed by certain of their subsidiaries. Sotheby's obligations under the Credit Agreements are secured by liens on all or substantially all of the personal property of the entities that are borrowers and guarantors under the Credit Agreements.
The Credit Agreements contain certain customary affirmative and negative covenants including, but not limited to, limitations on capital expenditures, a $600 million limitation on net outstanding auction guarantees (i.e., auction guarantees less the impact of related risk and reward sharing arrangements), and limitations on the use of proceeds from borrowings under the Credit Agreements. However, the Credit Agreements do not limit dividend payments and Common Stock repurchases provided that, both before and after giving effect thereto: (i) there are no events of default, (ii) the aggregate available borrowing capacity equals or exceeds $100 million, and (iii) the Liquidity Amount, as defined in the Credit Agreements, equals or exceeds $200 million. The Credit Agreements also contain certain financial covenants, which are only applicable during certain defined compliance periods. These financial covenants were not applicable for the twelve month period ended March 31, 2015.
Sotheby’s has incurred aggregate fees of approximately $18.5 million in conjunction with the establishment of and subsequent amendments to its credit agreement with General Electric Capital Corporation. These fees are being amortized on a straight-line basis through the August 22, 2019 maturity date of the Credit Agreements.
15#
The following tables summarize information relevant to the Credit Agreements as of and for the periods ended March 31, 2015, December 31, 2014, and March 31, 2014 (in thousands of dollars):
As of and for the Three Months Ended March 31, 2015 | Agency Credit Agreement | Finance Credit Agreement | Total | |||||||||
Maximum borrowing capacity (a) | $ | 300,000 | $ | 550,000 | $ | 850,000 | ||||||
Borrowing base | $ | 280,107 | $ | 550,000 | $ | 830,107 | ||||||
Borrowings outstanding | $ | — | $ | 501,500 | $ | 501,500 | ||||||
Available borrowing capacity (b) | $ | 280,107 | $ | 48,500 | $ | 328,607 | ||||||
Average borrowings outstanding | $ | — | $ | 472,872 | $ | 472,872 | ||||||
Borrowing Costs | $ | 706 | $ | 3,388 | $ | 4,094 | ||||||
As of and for the Year Ended December 31, 2014 | Agency Credit Agreement | Finance Credit Agreement | Total | |||||||||
Maximum borrowing capacity (a) | $ | 300,000 | $ | 550,000 | $ | 850,000 | ||||||
Borrowing base | $ | 237,830 | $ | 519,255 | $ | 757,085 | ||||||
Borrowings outstanding | $ | — | $ | 445,000 | $ | 445,000 | ||||||
Available borrowing capacity (b) | $ | 237,830 | $ | 74,255 | $ | 312,085 | ||||||
Average borrowings outstanding | $ | — | $ | 306,448 | $ | 306,448 | ||||||
Borrowing Costs | $ | 2,240 | $ | 8,740 | $ | 10,980 | ||||||
As of and for the Three Months Ended March 31, 2014 | Agency Credit Agreement | Finance Credit Agreement | Total | |||||||||
Maximum borrowing capacity (a) | $ | 150,000 | $ | 450,000 | $ | 600,000 | ||||||
Borrowing base | $ | 74,004 | $ | 286,077 | $ | 360,081 | ||||||
Borrowings outstanding | $ | — | $ | 185,000 | $ | 185,000 | ||||||
Available borrowing capacity (b) | $ | 74,004 | $ | 101,077 | $ | 175,081 | ||||||
Average borrowings outstanding | $ | — | $ | 91,944 | $ | 91,944 | ||||||
Borrowing Costs | $ | 597 | $ | 710 | $ | 1,307 | ||||||
(a) In August 2014, the Credit Agreements were amended and restated to, among other things, increase the maximum borrowing capacity of the Credit Agreements from $600 million to $850 million.
(b) The available borrowing capacity is calculated as the borrowing base less borrowings outstanding.
For the three months ended March 31, 2015 and 2014, borrowing costs related to the Finance Credit Agreement include interest of $3.2 million and $0.5 million, respectively, and fee amortization of $0.2 million and $0.2 million, respectively. For the year ended December 31, 2014, borrowing costs related to the Finance Credit Agreement include interest of $7.7 million and fee amortization of $1 million. Such borrowing costs are reflected in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations as the Cost of Finance Revenues. For the three months ended March 31, 2015 and 2014, the weighted average cost of borrowings related to the Finance Credit Agreement was approximately 2.9% and 3.1%, respectively. For the year ended December 31, 2014, the weighted average cost of borrowings related to the Finance Credit Agreement was approximately 2.9%.
Borrowing costs related to the Agency Credit Agreement, which include interest and fee amortization, are reflected in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations as Interest Expense. (See the table below for additional information related to Interest Expense associated with the Agency Credit Agreement.)
16#
Long-Term Debt—As of March 31, 2015, December 31, 2014, and March 31, 2014, Long-Term Debt consisted of the following (in thousands of dollars):
March 31, 2015 | December 31, 2014 | March 31, 2014 | ||||||||||
York Property Mortgage, net of unamortized discount of $891, $1,782, and $4,455 | $ | 218,642 | $ | 218,728 | $ | 218,742 | ||||||
2022 Senior Notes | 300,000 | 300,000 | 300,000 | |||||||||
Less Current Portion: | ||||||||||||
York Property Mortgage | (218,642 | ) | (218,728 | ) | (3,581 | ) | ||||||
Total Long-Term Debt, net | $ | 300,000 | $ | 300,000 | $ | 515,161 | ||||||
(See the captioned sections below for information related to the York Property Mortgage and the 2022 Senior Notes.)
York Property Mortgage—On February 6, 2009, Sotheby's purchased the land and building located at 1334 York Avenue, New York, New York (the “York Property”) from RFR Holding Corp. (“RFR”) for a purchase price of $370 million. The York Property is home to Sotheby's sole North American auction salesroom and principal North American exhibition space, including S|2, Sotheby's private sale exhibition gallery. The York Property is also home to the U.S. operations of the Finance segment, as well as Sotheby's corporate offices.
Sotheby's financed the $370 million purchase price through an initial $50 million cash payment made in conjunction with the signing of the related purchase and sale agreement on January 11, 2008, an $85 million cash payment made when the purchase was consummated on February 6, 2009, and the assumption of an existing $235 million mortgage on the York Property (the "York Property Mortgage").
The York Property Mortgage matures on July 1, 2035, but has an optional pre-payment date of July 1, 2015 and bears an annual rate of interest of approximately 5.6%, which increases to 10.6% subsequent to July 1, 2015 unless the mortgage is repaid by that date. Management is currently exploring its options with respect to a long-term refinancing of the York Property Mortgage, with the intent of completing such a refinancing no later than July 1, 2015. Accordingly, the $218.6 million carrying value of the York Property Mortgage is classified as a current liability on Sotheby's Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as of March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014.
In conjunction with the final accounting for the York Property purchase in February 2009, the York Property Mortgage was recorded on Sotheby's balance sheet at its $212.1 million fair value. The resulting $22.9 million debt discount is being amortized to Interest Expense over the remaining expected term of the loan through June 2015. Sotheby's paid fees of $2.4 million in conjunction with the assumption of the York Property Mortgage, which are also being amortized to Interest Expense through June 2015. As of March 31, 2015, the fair value of the York Property Mortgage was approximately $220.3 million based on a present value calculation utilizing an interest rate obtained from a third party source. As such, this fair value measurement is considered to be a Level 3 fair value measurement in the fair value hierarchy as per Accounting Standards Codification 820, Fair Value Measurements ("ASC 820").
The York Property and the York Property Mortgage are held by 1334 York, LLC, a separate legal entity of Sotheby's that maintains its own books and records and whose results are ultimately consolidated into Sotheby's financial statements. The assets of 1334 York, LLC are not available to satisfy the obligations of other Sotheby's affiliates or any other entity.
2022 Senior Notes—On September 27, 2012, Sotheby's issued $300 million aggregate principal amount of 5.25% Senior Notes, due October 1, 2022 (the "2022 Senior Notes"). The 2022 Senior Notes were offered only to qualified institutional buyers in accordance with Rule 144A and to non-U.S. Persons under Regulation S of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”). Holders of the 2022 Senior Notes do not have registration rights, and the 2022 Senior Notes have not been and will not be registered under the Securities Act.
The net proceeds from the issuance of the 2022 Senior Notes were approximately $293.7 million, after deducting fees paid to the initial purchasers, and were principally used to retire previously outstanding debt.
The 2022 Senior Notes are guaranteed, jointly and severally, on a senior unsecured basis by certain of Sotheby's existing and future domestic subsidiaries to the extent and on the same basis that such subsidiaries guarantee borrowings under the Credit Agreements. Interest on the 2022 Senior Notes is payable semi-annually in cash on April 1 and October 1 of each year.
17#
The 2022 Senior Notes are redeemable by Sotheby's, in whole or in part, on or after October 1, 2017, at specified redemption prices set forth in the underlying indenture, plus accrued and unpaid interest to, but excluding, the redemption date. Prior to October 1, 2017, the 2022 Senior Notes are redeemable, in whole or in part, at a redemption price equal to 100% of the principal amount to be redeemed, plus accrued and unpaid interest to, but excluding, the redemption date, plus a premium equal to the greater of 1% of the principal amount of the 2022 Senior Notes and a make-whole premium (as defined in the underlying indenture).
In addition, at any time prior to October 1, 2015, Sotheby's may redeem up to 35% of the aggregate principal amount of the 2022 Senior Notes with the net cash proceeds of certain equity offerings at the redemption price of 105.25% plus accrued and unpaid interest. The 2022 Senior Notes are not callable by holders unless Sotheby's is in default under the terms of the underlying indenture.
As of March 31, 2015, the $300 million principal amount of 2022 Senior Notes had a fair value of approximately $295.5 million based on a broker quoted price derived via a pricing model using observable and unobservable inputs. As such, this fair value measurement is considered to be a Level 3 fair value measurement in the fair value hierarchy as per ASC 820.
Future Principal and Interest Payments—The aggregate future principal and interest payments due under the Credit Agreements, the York Property Mortgage, and the 2022 Senior Notes during the five-year period after the March 31, 2015 balance sheet date are as follows (in thousands of dollars):
April 2015 to March 2016 | $ | 239,357 | |
April 2016 to March 2017 | $ | 15,750 | |
April 2017 to March 2018 | $ | 15,750 | |
April 2018 to March 2019 | $ | 15,750 | |
April 2019 to March 2020 | $ | 517,250 | |
Consistent with its presentation as a current liability on the March 31, 2015 Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet, the table above assumes that the York Property Mortgage will be repaid on or before July 1, 2015. Management is currently exploring its options with respect to a long-term refinancing of the York Property Mortgage, with the intent of completing such a refinancing no later than July 1, 2015.
Interest Expense—For the three months ended March 31, 2015 and 2014, Interest Expense consisted of the following (in thousands of dollars):
Three Months Ended | ||||||||
March 31, | ||||||||
2015 | 2014 | |||||||
Agency Credit Agreement: | ||||||||
Amortization of amendment and arrangement fees | $ | 315 | $ | 324 | ||||
Commitment fees | 391 | 273 | ||||||
Sub-total | 706 | 597 | ||||||
York Property Mortgage | 4,011 | 4,060 | ||||||
2022 Senior Notes | 3,938 | 3,938 | ||||||
Other interest expense | 6 | 188 | ||||||
Total Interest Expense | $ | 8,661 | $ | 8,783 | ||||
Other interest expense consists primarily of the amortization of debt issuance costs related to the 2022 Senior Notes.
7. Investment in RM Sotheby's
On February 18, 2015, Sotheby's acquired a 25% ownership interest in RM Auctions, an auction house for investment-quality automobiles, for $30.7 million. Following this investment, RM Auctions is now known as RM Sotheby's. In addition to the initial 25% ownership interest, Sotheby’s has governance participation and a comprehensive partnership agreement to work together to drive growth in the business. Over time, Sotheby’s will have opportunities to increase its ownership stake as the partnership evolves and grows.
18#
8. Defined Benefit Pension Plan
Sotheby’s sponsors a defined benefit pension plan covering U.K. employees who entered service prior to April 1, 2004 (the “U.K. Pension Plan”). The table below summarizes the components of the net pension cost (benefit) related to the U.K. Pension Plan for the three months ended March 31, 2015 and 2014 (in thousands of dollars):
Three months ended March 31, | ||||||||
2015 | 2014 | |||||||
Service cost | $ | 1,115 | $ | 1,130 | ||||
Interest cost | 3,205 | 3,927 | ||||||
Expected return on plan assets | (5,004 | ) | (5,819 | ) | ||||
Amortization of previously unrecognized net pension losses | 984 | 589 | ||||||
Amortization of prior service cost | 90 | — | ||||||
Net pension cost (benefit) | $ | 390 | $ | (173 | ) | |||
For the three months ended March 31, 2015, Sotheby's contributed $0.5 million to the U.K. Pension Plan, and total contributions for the year ending December 31, 2015 are expected to be approximately $2.1 million.
9. Commitments and Contingencies
Compensation Arrangements—As of March 31, 2015, Sotheby’s had compensation arrangements with certain senior employees, which expire at various points between December 2015 and March 31, 2020. Such arrangements may provide, among other benefits, for minimum salary levels and for compensation under Sotheby's incentive compensation programs that is payable only if specified Company and individual goals are attained. Additionally, under certain circumstances, certain of these arrangements provide annual share-based payments, severance payments, and other cash compensation. The aggregate remaining commitment for salaries and other cash compensation related to these compensation arrangements, excluding any participation in Sotheby’s incentive compensation programs, was approximately $22 million as of March 31, 2015.
Guarantees of Collection—A guarantee of collection is a guarantee to a consignor that, under certain conditions, Sotheby's will pay the consignor for property that has sold at auction, but has not yet been paid for by the purchaser. It is not a guarantee that the property will be sold at a certain minimum price.
Sotheby's has an outstanding guarantee of collection related to property that has been offered at auctions occurring through March 31, 2015 and which will be offered at future auctions. In the event a purchaser does not pay for any item sold at auction by the settlement date, which is 35 days after the date of each respective auction or such other date agreed to by the consignor, Sotheby's is required to pay the consignor the net sale proceeds up to the final pre-sale mid-estimate of the item, but Sotheby's would then take title to the property and have the right to pursue the defaulting buyer and/or reoffer the property at a future sale. As of March 31, 2015, the guarantee of collection related to property sold under this arrangement was $13.6 million.
As of March 31, 2015, Sotheby's has another outstanding guarantee of collection totaling $11.7 million related to an item sold at auction in the fourth quarter of 2014. The purchaser of this property is scheduled to pay the outstanding balance due in the second quarter of 2015.
Legal Actions—Sotheby’s becomes involved in various claims and lawsuits incidental to the ordinary course of its business, including the matters described below. Management is required to assess the likelihood of any adverse judgments or outcomes in these matters, as well as potential ranges of probable or reasonably possible losses. A determination of the amount of losses, if any, to be recorded or disclosed as a result of these contingencies is based on a careful analysis of each individual exposure with, in some cases, the assistance of outside legal counsel. The amount of losses recorded or disclosed for such contingencies may change in the future due to new developments in each matter or a change in settlement strategy. Management does not believe that the outcome of any of these pending claims or proceedings, individually and in the aggregate, will have a material adverse effect on Sotheby’s consolidated results of operations, financial condition and/or cash flows.
19#
Estate of Robert Graham, et al. v. Sotheby's, Inc. is a purported class action commenced in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California in October 2011 on behalf of U.S. artists (and their estates) whose artworks were sold by Sotheby's in the State of California or at auction by California sellers and for which a royalty was allegedly due under the California Resale Royalties Act (the “Resale Royalties Act”). Plaintiffs seek unspecified damages, punitive damages and injunctive relief for alleged violations of the Resale Royalties Act and the California Unfair Competition Law. In January 2012, Sotheby’s filed a motion to dismiss the action on the grounds, among others, that the Resale Royalties Act violates the U.S. Constitution and is preempted by the U.S. Copyright Act of 1976. In February 2012, the plaintiffs filed their response to Sotheby's motion to dismiss. The court heard oral arguments on the motion to dismiss on March 12, 2012. On May 17, 2012, the court issued an order dismissing the action on the ground that the Resale Royalties Act violated the Commerce Clause of the U.S. Constitution. The plaintiffs have appealed this ruling. On May 5, 2015, an en banc panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit issued a decision affirming the lower court decision that the Resale Royalties Act was unconstitutional insofar as it sought to apply to sales outside of the state of California.
Third Point LLC v. Ruprecht, et al., Civil Action No. 9469-VCP (Del. Ch. 2014)—On March 25, 2014, Third Point LLC ("Third Point") filed a verified complaint against William F. Ruprecht, Peregrine A. M. Cavendish, Domenico De Sole, John M. Angelo, Steven B. Dodge, Daniel H. Meyer, Allen I. Questrom, Marsha E. Simms, Michael I. Sovern, Robert S. Taubman, Diana L. Taylor and Dennis M. Weibling (collectively, the “Directors”) and nominal defendant Sotheby’s. Third Point alleged that the Directors breached their fiduciary duties of loyalty and due care in adopting a shareholder rights plan (the “Rights Plan”) on October 4, 2013 and enforcing the plan against Third Point on March 21, 2014 by denying Third Point’s request that it be treated as a 13G filer under the Rights Plan to allow it to acquire up to 20% of Sotheby’s outstanding Common Stock. Third Point alleged that the Rights Plan was not a reasonable response to a legitimate threat to Sotheby’s and alleged that the adoption and continuation of the Rights Plan hindered its ability to wage an effective proxy contest. The complaint sought a declaration that the Directors breached their fiduciary duties and that the Rights Plan was unenforceable, and sought an order that Sotheby’s be required to redeem the Rights Plan in its entirety, or in the alternative, be enjoined from enforcing the Rights Plan against Third Point, or be required to amend the Rights Plan to allow Third Point to acquire up to 20% of Sotheby’s outstanding Common Stock. Along with its complaint, Third Point moved for expedited proceedings. On April 10, 2014, the Court ordered partial coordination with The Employees Retirement System of the City of St. Louis v. Ruprecht, et al., Civil Action No. 9497-VCP and Louisiana Municipal Employees Retirement System v. Ruprecht, et al., Civil Action No.--9508-VCP, which are discussed below (together, the "Stockholder Actions"), with this action. On May 2, 2014, following briefing and argument on plaintiffs’ motions for preliminary injunctions in the coordinated actions, the Court issued a Memorandum Opinion denying the motion. Specifically, the Court found that plaintiffs failed to show a likelihood of success on the merits of their claims. On May 4, 2014, Sotheby's entered into a support agreement that, among other things, resolved the previously pending proxy contest. As part of this support agreement, Third Point agreed to dismiss with prejudice this litigation. On May 6, 2014, Third Point filed a notice of dismissal terminating its case.
The Employees Retirement System of the City of St. Louis v. Ruprecht, et al., Civil Action No. 9497-VCP (Del. Ch. 2014)—On April 1, 2014, the Employees Retirement System of the City of St. Louis, the plaintiff, on behalf of a putative class of Sotheby’s stockholders, filed a verified class action complaint against the Directors and nominal defendant Sotheby’s. The plaintiff alleged in two counts that the Directors breached their fiduciary duties in adopting the Rights Plan and by including so-called “proxy puts” in certain Sotheby’s credit agreements. The plaintiff alleged that the Rights Plan was discriminatory, was designed to entrench current board members, and undermined the proxy contest that was being conducted by Third Point. In addition, the plaintiff alleged that the Directors endorsed credit agreements containing “proxy put” provisions that were unnecessary, preemptive defensive measures designed to insulate Directors from proxy contests. The plaintiff sought judgment preliminarily and permanently enjoining the Rights Plan, judgment preliminarily enjoining the Directors from using any proxies solicited before they “approve” the Third Point nominees for directorships, and a declaration that the Rights Plan was unenforceable and that the Directors breached their fiduciary duties to the putative class. On April 10, 2014, the Court ordered partial coordination of this action and Louisiana Municipal Employees Retirement System v. Ruprecht, et al., Civil Action No. --9508-VCP with the prior pending action in Third Point LLC v. Ruprecht, et al., Civil Action No. 9469-VCP. On May 2, 2014, following briefing and argument on plaintiffs’ motions for preliminary injunctions in the coordinated actions, the Court issued a Memorandum Opinion denying the motion. Specifically, the Court found that plaintiffs failed to show a likelihood of success on the merits of their claims. On June 4, 2014, the plaintiffs in this action and in the Louisiana Municipal Employees Retirement System action discussed below jointly filed a motion for an order dismissing the Stockholder Actions as moot and for an award of attorneys’ fees and expenses in the amount of $3.5 million. On July 25, 2014, Sotheby’s filed a brief in opposition to the plaintiffs’ motion. A hearing on the motion was held on August 14, 2014. Prior to the Court’s resolution of the motion, the parties agreed to a settlement. On January 15, 2015, the Court entered a stipulation agreed to by the parties and an order regarding dismissal of the Stockholder Actions and an award of attorneys’ fees and expenses (the “Order”). As required by the Order, Sotheby’s is notifying stockholders that the Stockholder Actions are moot and that defendants, through their insurer, have paid to plaintiffs’ counsel $1.6 million in full satisfaction of their application for attorneys’ fees and expenses in the Stockholder Actions. As Sotheby’s directors and officers insurance carrier funded the full $1.6 million payment, the
20#
resolution of the Stockholder Actions did not result in any cost to Sotheby’s. The Order further provided that the Stockholder Actions would be dismissed as moot without further action of the Court unless another stockholder of Sotheby’s submitted a written objection to the Court within 30 days of the March 2, 2015 notice date. No stockholder objections were submitted within the applicable 30 day notice period.
Louisiana Municipal Employees Retirement System v. Ruprecht, et al., Civil Action No.--9508-VCP (Del. Ch. 2014)—On April 3, 2014, Louisiana Municipal Employees Retirement System, the plaintiff, on behalf of a putative class of Sotheby’s stockholders, filed a verified class action complaint against the Directors and nominal defendant Sotheby’s. The plaintiff alleged in two counts that the Directors breached their fiduciary duties in adopting the Rights Plan and by including so-called “proxy puts” in certain Sotheby’s credit agreements. The plaintiff alleged that the Rights Plan was discriminatory, was designed to entrench current board members, and undermined the proxy contest that was being conducted by Third Point. In addition, the plaintiff alleged that the Directors endorsed credit agreements containing “proxy put” provisions that were unnecessary, preemptive defensive measures designed to insulate Directors from proxy contests. The plaintiff sought judgment preliminarily and permanently enjoining the Rights Plan, judgment preliminarily enjoining the Directors from using any proxies solicited before they “approve” the Third Point nominees for directorships, and a declaration that the Rights Plan was unenforceable and that the Directors breached their fiduciary duties to the putative class. On April 10, 2014, the Court ordered partial coordination of this action and The Employees Retirement System of the City of St. Louis v. Ruprecht, et al., Civil Action No. 9497-VCP with the prior pending action in Third Point LLC v. Ruprecht, et al., Civil Action No. 9469-VCP. On May 2, 2014, following briefing and argument on plaintiffs’ motions for preliminary injunctions in the coordinated actions, the Court issued a Memorandum Opinion denying the motions. Specifically, the Court found that plaintiffs failed to show a likelihood of success on the merits of their claims. See The Employees Retirement System of the City of St. Louis v. Ruprecht, et al., Civil Action No. 9497-VCP (Del. Ch. 2014) above for the resolution of this action pursuant to the Order.
(See Note 5 for information related to unfunded commitments to extend additional credit through Sotheby's Finance segment. See Note 6 for information related to Sotheby's debt commitments. See Note 10 for information related to Sotheby's auction guarantees. See Note 17 for information related to Sotheby's income tax contingencies.)
10. Auction Guarantees
From time-to-time in the ordinary course of its business, Sotheby’s will guarantee to a consignor a minimum sale price in connection with the sale of property at auction (an “auction guarantee”). Sotheby’s is generally entitled to a share of the excess proceeds (the “overage”) if the property under the auction guarantee sells above the guaranteed price. In the event that the property sells for less than the guaranteed price, Sotheby’s must perform under the auction guarantee by funding the difference between the sale price at auction and the amount of the auction guarantee. If the property does not sell, the amount of the auction guarantee must be paid, but Sotheby’s has the right to recover such amount through the future sale of the property. Depending on the mix of items subject to a guarantee, in advance of peak selling seasons, a small number of guaranteed items may represent a substantial portion of the aggregate amount of outstanding auction guarantees.
In situations when the guaranteed property does not sell, the property is recorded as Inventory on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets at the lower of cost (i.e., the amount paid under the auction guarantee) or management’s estimate of the property's net realizable value (i.e., the expected sale price upon disposition). The sale proceeds ultimately realized by Sotheby’s in these situations may equal, exceed, or be less than the amount recorded as Inventory.
Sotheby’s may reduce its financial exposure under auction guarantees through contractual risk and reward sharing arrangements. Such auction guarantee risk and reward sharing arrangements include irrevocable bids and partner sharing arrangements. An irrevocable bid is an arrangement under which a counterparty commits to bid a predetermined price on the guaranteed property. If the irrevocable bid is the winning bid, the counterparty purchases the property at the predetermined price plus the applicable buyer’s premium, which is the same amount that any other successful bidder would pay at that price. If the irrevocable bid is not the winning bid, the counterparty is generally entitled to receive a share of the auction commission earned on the sale and/or a share of any overage. In a partner sharing arrangement, a counterparty commits to fund: (i) a share of the difference between the sale price at auction and the amount of the auction guarantee if the property sells for less than the minimum guaranteed price or (ii) a share of the minimum guaranteed price if the property does not sell while taking ownership of a proportionate share of the unsold property. In exchange for accepting a share of the financial exposure under the auction guarantee, the counterparty in a partner sharing arrangement is generally entitled to receive a share of the auction commission earned if the property sells and/or a share of any overage.
The counterparties to Sotheby's auction guarantee risk and reward sharing arrangements are typically major international art dealers or major art collectors. Sotheby’s could be exposed to losses in the event any of these counterparties do not perform according to the terms of these contractual arrangements.
21#
Although irrevocable bid and partner sharing arrangements may be used to reduce the risk associated with auction guarantees, Sotheby's may also enter into auction guarantees without securing such arrangements. In these circumstances, Sotheby's could be exposed to auction guarantee losses and/or deterioration in auction commission margins if the underlying property fails to sell at the minimum guaranteed price. Furthermore, in such situations, Sotheby's liquidity could be reduced.
Sotheby's credit agreement has a covenant that imposes a $600 million limitation on net outstanding auction guarantees (i.e., auction guarantees less the impact of related risk and reward sharing arrangements). In addition to compliance with this covenant, Sotheby's use of auction guarantees is also subject to management and, in some cases, Board of Directors, approval.
As of March 31, 2015, Sotheby’s had outstanding auction guarantees totaling $201.9 million. Sotheby's financial exposure under these auction guarantees is reduced by irrevocable bids totaling $56.2 million. Each of these auction guarantees has a minimum guaranteed price that is within the range of the pre-sale auction estimates for the underlying property. A substantial portion of the property related to these auction guarantees is being offered at auctions in the second quarter of 2015.
Sotheby's is obligated under the terms of certain auction guarantees to advance all or a portion of the guaranteed amount prior to auction. As of March 31, 2015, $25 million of the guaranteed amount had been advanced by Sotheby's and is recorded on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets within Notes Receivable (see Note 5). As of March 31, 2015, December 31, 2014, and March 31, 2014, the carrying value of the liability representing the estimated fair value of Sotheby’s obligation to perform under its auction guarantees totaled $7.3 million, $5.3 million, and $9.8 million, respectively, and is recorded on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets within Accounts Payable and Accrued Liabilities.
As of May 6, 2015, Sotheby's had outstanding auction guarantees totaling $174 million and, as of that date, Sotheby's financial exposure was reduced by risk and reward sharing arrangements totaling $74.2 million. Each of the auction guarantees outstanding as of May 6, 2015 had a minimum guaranteed price that was within the range of the pre-sale auction estimates for the underlying property. Substantially all of the property related to these auction guarantees is being offered at auctions in the second quarter of 2015. As of May 6, 2015, $6.9 million of the guaranteed amount had been advanced by Sotheby's.
11. Shareholders' Equity and Dividends
Special Dividend and Common Stock Repurchase Program—In January 2014, Sotheby's completed a review of its capital allocation and financial policies and as a result: (i) established separate capital structures and financial policies for its Agency and Finance segments, (ii) declared a special dividend of $300 million ($4.34 per share), and (iii) authorized a 5-year, $150 million Common Stock repurchase program principally to offset the annual vesting of employee share-based payments.
The $300 million special dividend was paid on March 17, 2014 and was funded principally by the repatriation of $250 million of cash from Sotheby’s foreign subsidiaries, with the remaining $50 million funded by existing domestic cash balances. In conjunction with this special dividend, dividend equivalents of approximately $11 million were accrued on share-based payments to Sotheby's employees and charged against retained earnings, of which approximately $2 million and $4 million was paid in March 2015 and March 2014, respectively. (See Note 12 for information related to Sotheby's share-based payment programs.)
In conjunction with the Common Stock repurchase program, Sotheby's repurchased 558,171 shares of its Common Stock for an aggregate purchase price of $25 million ($44.79 per share) pursuant to an accelerated stock buyback agreement that was concluded in March 2014.
Quarterly Cash Dividends—On February 26, 2015, Sotheby's Board of Directors declared a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share (approximately $6.9 million) that was paid on March 16, 2015 to shareholders of record as of March 9, 2015. On May 7, 2015, the Board of Directors declared a quarterly cash dividend of $0.10 per share (approximately $6.9 million) payable on June 15, 2015 to shareholders of record as of June 1, 2015. On February 27, 2014, the Board of Directors declared a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share (approximately $6.9 million) that was paid on March 17, 2014 to shareholders of record as of March 10, 2014.
22#
12. Share-Based Payments
Share-based payments to employees include performance-based stock unit awards, restricted stock units, restricted stock, and stock options. A description of each of these share-based payments is provided below. Compensation expense related to share-based payments is generally recorded as a component of Salaries and Related Costs in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations. However, share-based payment expense of $2 million recognized in the first quarter of 2015 related to fully vested restricted stock units granted to Thomas S. Smith, Jr. upon the commencement of his employment as Sotheby's President and Chief Executive Officer ("CEO") is reported within CEO Separation and Transition Costs (see Note 13).
For the three months ended March 31, 2015 and 2014, compensation expense related to share-based payments, including the $2 million charge classified within CEO Separation and Transition Costs, was as follows (in thousands of dollars):
Three months ended March 31, | ||||||||
2015 | 2014 | |||||||
Pre-Tax | $ | 7,653 | $ | 6,247 | ||||
After-Tax | $ | 4,831 | $ | 4,152 | ||||
For the three months ended March 31, 2015 and 2014, Sotheby's recognized $1.1 million and $3.1 million, respectively, of excess tax benefits related to share-based payment arrangements. These tax benefits represent the amount by which the tax deduction resulting from the exercise or vesting of share-based payments exceeds the tax benefit initially recognized in Sotheby's financial statements upon the amortization of compensation expense for these awards. Such excess tax benefits are recognized on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as an increase to Additional Paid-in Capital and are classified within Financing Activities in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows.
As of March 31, 2015, unrecognized compensation expense related to the unvested portion of share-based payments was $53.8 million. This compensation expense is expected to be amortized over a weighted-average period of approximately 2.9 years. Sotheby’s does not capitalize any compensation expense related to share-based payments to employees.
Sotheby's Restricted Stock Unit Plan—Sotheby's Second Amended and Restated Restricted Stock Unit Plan (the “Restricted Stock Unit Plan”) provides for the issuance of Restricted Stock Units (“RSU's”) to employees, subject to the approval of the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors (the “Compensation Committee”). In making awards under the Restricted Stock Unit Plan, the Compensation Committee takes into account the nature of the services rendered by employees, their present and potential future contributions to Sotheby's success, and such other factors as the Compensation Committee in its discretion deems relevant.
RSU's issued under the Restricted Stock Unit Plan generally vest evenly over a three-year service period. Prior to vesting, holders of RSU's do not have voting rights, but are entitled to receive dividend equivalents. Dividend equivalents paid to holders of unvested RSU's are not forfeitable. RSU's may not be sold, assigned, transferred, pledged or otherwise encumbered until they vest.
Performance Share Units (or “PSU's”) are RSU's that generally vest over three or four years, subject to the achievement of certain profitability targets. Prior to vesting, holders of PSU's do not have voting rights and are not entitled to receive dividends or dividend equivalents. Dividend equivalents are generally credited to holders of PSU's and are only paid for the portion of PSU's that vest and become shares of Common Stock. PSU's may not be sold, assigned, transferred, pledged or otherwise encumbered until they vest.
As discussed in more detail below, in the first quarter of 2015, Sotheby's granted Thomas S. Smith, Jr., its new President and CEO, PSU's under the Restricted Stock Unit Plan with a single vesting opportunity after a five-year service period contingent upon the achievement of pre-determined levels of Sotheby's stock price appreciation. These PSU's do not have any voting or dividend equivalent rights. In addition, as discussed in more detail below under "CEO Share-Based Payment Awards," in the first quarter of 2015, Sotheby's also granted Mr. Smith 158,638 restricted stock shares and 47,070 fully vested RSU's outside of the Restricted Stock Unit Plan.
23#
For the three months ended March 31, 2015, in addition to the PSU's granted to Mr. Smith, Sotheby's issued share-based payment awards under the Restricted Stock Unit Plan with a total fair value of $28.2 million, as follows:
• | 384,664 PSU's with a fair value of $16.9 million and a single vesting opportunity after a three-year service period, including: |
◦ | 304,882 PSU's with a fair value of $13.4 million, related almost entirely to Sotheby's incentive compensation programs, and |
◦ | 79,782 PSU's with a fair value of $3.5 million issued to William F. Ruprecht, Sotheby's former President and CEO. In accordance with the terms of his amended employment agreement, upon the termination of his employment on March 31, 2015, Mr. Ruprecht forfeited 60,109 PSU's from this award. Accordingly, Mr. Ruprecht ultimately retained 19,673 PSU's with a fair value of $0.9 million. |
• | 258,827 RSU's with annual vesting over a three-year service period and a fair value of $11.3 million, related almost entirely to Sotheby's incentive compensation programs. |
CEO Share-Based Payment Awards—In the first quarter of 2015, share-based payment awards with a fair value of $16.5 million were granted to Thomas S. Smith, Jr., Sotheby's new President and CEO, upon the commencement of his employment on March 31, 2015. These awards consist of the following:
• | An inducement award of 158,638 shares of restricted stock with a fair value of $6.5 million, with periodic vesting opportunities between March 4, 2016 and September 1, 2017, which substantially correspond to the times when forfeited opportunities at Mr. Smith's previous employer would otherwise have become eligible to vest. These restricted stock shares were not issued pursuant to the Restricted Stock Unit Plan and have not been registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission. These shares have voting rights and a non-forfeitable right to dividends. |
• | An inducement award of 47,070 fully vested RSU's with a fair value of $2 million awarded to Mr. Smith to compensate him for a portion of the annual bonus that he would have received from his previous employer. The Common Stock shares associated with this award will be distributed in three approximately equal installments on the third, fourth, and fifth anniversaries of the grant date. These RSU's were not issued pursuant to the Restricted Stock Unit Plan and have not been registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission. These RSU's will be credited with dividend equivalents based on the dividends paid on the underlying number of shares of Common Stock. |
• | An award of 94,140 PSU's under the Restricted Stock Unit Plan with a fair value of $8 million and with a single vesting opportunity after a five-year service period contingent upon the achievement of pre-determined levels of Sotheby's stock price appreciation. This award provides opportunities to vest in incremental PSU's up to 350% of the initial award, such that the maximum number of shares that may be payable with respect to this award is 329,490 shares. These PSU's do not have a right to earn dividend equivalents. |
Summary of Outstanding Share-Based Payment Awards—For the three months ended March 31, 2015, changes to the number of outstanding RSU’s, PSU’s, and Restricted Stock shares were as follows (shares in thousands)
Number of RSU’s, PSU’s, and Restricted Stock Shares | Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value | |||||
Outstanding at January 1, 2015 | 1,806 | $ | 40.32 | |||
Granted | 943 | $ | 47.39 | |||
Vested | (549 | ) | $ | 39.31 | ||
Canceled | (172 | ) | $ | 42.07 | ||
Outstanding at March 31, 2015 | 2,028 | $ | 43.74 | |||
As of March 31, 2015, 3.2 million units were available for future awards pursuant to the Restricted Stock Unit Plan. The aggregate fair value of RSU’s and PSU's that vested during the three months ended March 31, 2015 and 2014 was $22.9 million and $25.3 million, respectively, based on the closing price of Sotheby's Common Stock on the dates the shares vested.
24#
Stock Options—Stock options issued pursuant to the Sotheby's 1997 Stock Option Plan are exercisable into authorized, but unissued shares of Sotheby's Common Stock. Stock options vest evenly over four years and expire ten years after the date of grant. As of March 31, 2015, 104,100 shares of Common Stock were available for the issuance of stock options under the Stock Option Plan.
As of March 31, 2015, 50,000 stock options were outstanding and exercisable with a weighted average exercise price of $22.11 per share, a weighted average remaining contractual term of 4.9 years, and an aggregate intrinsic value of $1 million.
No stock options were exercised or granted during the three months ended March 31, 2015. For the three months ended March 31, 2014, the aggregate intrinsic value of options exercised was $1.2 million, the cash proceeds received as a result of these exercises was $1 million, and the associated excess tax benefit recognized was $0.3 million.
13. CEO Separation and Transition Costs
In the first quarter of 2015, Sotheby's recognized $4.2 million in costs associated with the hiring of Thomas S. Smith, Jr. as its President and Chief Executive Officer which are classified within CEO Separation and Transition Costs. These costs principally relate to compensation of $3.1 million owed to Mr. Smith to replace incentive compensation that he expected to receive from his previous employer and consist of a fully vested restricted stock unit award with a fair value of $2 million granted on March 31, 2015 and a $1.1 million cash payment that is due in September 2015. There is no required service period associated with this compensation. CEO Separation and Transition Costs also include approximately $1.1 million in recruitment and other professional fees associated with the CEO hiring process.
14. Restructuring Charges
On July 16, 2014, Sotheby's Board of Directors approved a restructuring plan (the "2014 Restructuring Plan") principally impacting Sotheby's operations in the United States and the U.K. The 2014 Restructuring Plan resulted in Restructuring Charges (net) of approximately $14.2 million in 2014, consisting of $13.9 million in employee termination benefits recognized in the second half of 2014 and approximately $0.3 million in lease exit costs recognized in the fourth quarter of 2014. A large majority of the headcount reductions resulting from the 2014 Restructuring Plan have been completed and the remainder will occur by June 30, 2015. For the three months ended March 31, 2015, Sotheby's recognized a benefit in Restructuring Charges (net) of $0.4 million related to adjustments to the accrual for employee termination benefits. As of March 31, 2015, Sotheby's has made payments of approximately $8.5 million related to the 2014 Restructuring Plan, and the related accrued liability has been reduced by $0.9 million as a result of foreign currency exchange rate changes. Accordingly, as of March 31, 2015, the remaining accrued liability related to the 2014 Restructuring Plan recorded on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets within Accounts Payable and Accrued Liabilities was $4.4 million. This liability is expected to be settled through cash payments to be made principally in the second quarter of 2015.
15. Special Charges
In the first quarter of 2014, Sotheby's recognized special charges of $5.7 million related to third party advisory, legal, and other professional service fees directly associated with issues related to shareholder activism and the resulting proxy contest with Third Point. (See Note 9 for a summary of related legal actions.)
25#
16. Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss
The following is a summary of the changes in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss for the three months ended March 31, 2015 and 2014 (in thousands of dollars):
Three months ended March 31, 2015 | Foreign Currency Items | Defined Benefit Pension Items | Total | |||||||||
Balance at January 1, 2015 | $ | (33,223 | ) | $ | (43,543 | ) | $ | (76,766 | ) | |||
Other comprehensive (loss) income before reclassifications | (21,458 | ) | 2,189 | (19,269 | ) | |||||||
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive loss | — | 858 | 858 | |||||||||
Net other comprehensive (loss) income | (21,458 | ) | 3,047 | (18,411 | ) | |||||||
Balance at March 31, 2015 | $ | (54,681 | ) | $ | (40,496 | ) | $ | (95,177 | ) | |||
Three months ended March 31, 2014 | Foreign Currency Items | Defined Benefit Pension Items | Total | |||||||||
Balance at January 1, 2014 | $ | (1,352 | ) | $ | (38,101 | ) | $ | (39,453 | ) | |||
Other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassifications | 1,866 | (398 | ) | 1,468 | ||||||||
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive loss | 2,058 | 472 | 2,530 | |||||||||
Net other comprehensive income | 3,924 | 74 | 3,998 | |||||||||
Balance at March 31, 2014 | $ | 2,572 | $ | (38,027 | ) | $ | (35,455 | ) | ||||
Other Comprehensive (Loss) Income reflects the change in the foreign currency translation adjustment account during the period, including the change in the foreign currency translation adjustment account related to the U.K. Pension Plan. Such amounts are reported on a cumulative basis in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets.
For the three months ended March 31, 2015 and 2014, $0.9 million and $0.5 million (respectively, net of taxes) was reclassified from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss and recorded on a pre-tax basis to Salaries and Related Costs in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations as a result of the amortization of previously unrecognized U.K. Pension Plan losses and prior service costs. (See Note 8 for information related to the U.K. Pension Plan.)
For the three months ended March 31, 2014, $2.1 million was reclassified from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss to Other Expense in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations as a result of the cumulative translation adjustment that was recognized upon the liquidation of a foreign subsidiary.
26#
17. Uncertain Tax Positions
As of March 31, 2015, Sotheby’s liability for unrecognized tax benefits, excluding interest and penalties, was $20.6 million, representing a net decrease of $2.2 million when compared to the liability of $22.8 million as of December 31, 2014. This net decrease is primarily the result of both the expiration of the statute of limitations for certain tax years and the expected closing of tax audits for certain tax years, partially offset by the accrual of tax reserves related to transfer pricing. As of March 31, 2014, Sotheby’s liability for unrecognized tax benefits, excluding interest and penalties, was $22.9 million. As of March 31, 2015, December 31, 2014, and March 31, 2014, the total amount of unrecognized tax benefits that, if recognized, would favorably affect Sotheby’s effective tax rate was $12.7 million, $12.3 million, and $12 million, respectively. Sotheby’s believes it is reasonably possible that a decrease of $5.7 million in the balance of unrecognized tax benefits can occur within 12 months of the March 31, 2015 balance sheet date as a result of the expiration of statutes of limitations and the expected settlements of ongoing tax audits.
Sotheby’s is subject to taxation in the U.S. and various state and foreign jurisdictions and, as a result, is subject to ongoing tax audits in various jurisdictions. Sotheby’s U.S. federal, and various state, and foreign tax returns are currently under examination by taxing authorities. The earliest open tax year for the major jurisdictions in which Sotheby's does business, which include the U.S. (including various state and local jurisdictions), the U.K., and Hong Kong, is 2007.
Sotheby’s recognizes interest expense and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits as a component of Income Tax Expense. The accrual for such interest and penalties decreased by $0.3 million for the three months ended March 31, 2015.
Sotheby’s policy is to record interest expense related to sales, value added and other non-income based taxes as Interest Expense in its Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations. Penalties related to such taxes are recorded as General and Administrative Expenses in its Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations. Interest expense and penalties related to income taxes are recorded as a component of Income Tax (Benefit) Expense in Sotheby’s Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations.
18. Related Party Transactions
From time-to-time, in the ordinary course of business, related parties such as members of the Board of Directors and employees transact with Sotheby's to buy and sell property at auction and through private sales. For the three months ended March 31, 2015 and March 31, 2014, Sotheby’s recognized Agency Revenues of $0.7 million and $0.6 million, respectively, related to the sale and purchase of property by related parties.
As of March 31, 2015, December 31, 2014, and March 31, 2014, Accounts Receivable (net) included $0.3 million, $1.1 million, and $2.5 million, respectively, associated with auction or private sale purchases made by related parties.
19. Recently Issued Accounting Standards
In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-09, which introduces a new five-step framework for revenue recognition. The core principal of the standard is that entities should recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration for which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. This ASU also requires enhanced disclosures regarding the nature, amount, timing, and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows arising from an entity’s contracts with customers. This standard will be effective for Sotheby’s beginning on January 1, 2017 and can be applied either retrospectively to each period presented or as a cumulative-effect adjustment as of the date of adoption. Management is currently assessing the potential impact of adopting this new accounting standard on Sotheby’s financial statements.
In February 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-02 which eliminates the deferral of the requirements of ASU No. 2009-17 for certain interests in investment funds and provides a scope exception from Accounting Standards Codification Topic 810 for certain investments in money market funds. ASU No. 2015-02 also makes several modifications to the consolidation guidance for variable interest entities ("VIEs") and general partners’ investments in limited partnerships, as well as modifications to the evaluation of whether limited partnerships are VIEs or voting interest entities. ASU No. 2015-02 is effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2015. Early adoption is permitted. Management is currently assessing the potential impact of adopting this new accounting standard on Sotheby’s financial statements.
27#
In March 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-03, which changes the presentation of debt issuance costs in the balance sheet. ASU 2015-03 requires debt issuance costs to be included as a direct deduction from the related debt liability in the balance sheet. Under the current guidance, unamortized debt issuance costs are reported as assets in the balance sheet, but under the new standard, debt issuance costs will no longer be reported as assets. ASU 2015-03 will be effective for Sotheby’s beginning January 1, 2016 and must be applied retrospectively to each period presented. Management is currently assessing the potential impact of adopting this new accounting standard on Sotheby’s financial statements.
28#
ITEM 2: MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF
OPERATIONS
Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (or “MD&A”) should be read in conjunction with Note 4 (“Segment Reporting”) of Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
Sotheby's Business
Sotheby’s is a global art business whose operations are organized under three segments: Agency, Principal, and Finance. The Agency segment earns commissions by matching buyers and sellers of authenticated fine art, decorative art, and jewelry (collectively, “art” or “works of art” or “artwork” or "property") through the auction or private sale process. The Principal segment earns revenues from the sale of artworks that have been purchased opportunistically by Sotheby’s. The Finance segment earns interest income through art-related financing activities by making loans that are secured by works of art.
The global art market is influenced over time by the overall strength and stability of the global economy, the financial markets of various countries, geopolitical conditions, and world events, all of which may impact the willingness of potential buyers and sellers to purchase and sell art. In addition, the amount and quality of art consigned for sale is influenced by other factors not within Sotheby’s control, and many consignments often become available as a result of the death or financial or marital difficulties of the owner. These factors cause the supply and demand for works of art to be unpredictable and may lead to significant variability in Sotheby's revenues from period to period.
Competition in the international art market is intense. A fundamental challenge facing any auctioneer or art dealer is to obtain high quality and valuable property for sale either as agent or as principal. Sotheby's primary global competitor is Christie’s International, PLC, a privately held, French-owned, auction house. In response to the competitive environment, Sotheby’s may offer consignors a variety of financial inducements such as auction commission sharing arrangements and auction guarantees as a means to secure high-value consignments. Although these inducements may lead to a higher level of auction consignments, they put pressure on auction commission margins, and auction guarantees introduce the possibility of incurring a loss on the transaction and reduced liquidity if the underlying property fails to sell at the minimum guaranteed price. To mitigate the pressure on auction commission margins, from time-to-time, Sotheby’s adjusts its commission rate structures. In addition, Sotheby’s may reduce its financial exposure under auction guarantees through contractual risk and reward sharing arrangements such as irrevocable bids under which a counterparty commits to bid a predetermined price on the guaranteed property.
Sotheby's is a service business in which the ability of its employees to source high-value works of art and develop and maintain relationships with potential sellers and buyers of art is essential to its success. Sotheby's business is highly dependent upon attracting and retaining qualified personnel and employee compensation is its most substantial operating expense. Sotheby’s also incurs significant costs to promote and conduct its auctions, as well as general and administrative expenses to support its global operations. While a large portion of Sotheby’s expenses are fixed, certain categories of expense are variable. For example, sale marketing costs are dependent upon the volume of auction activity and certain elements of employee compensation are a function of Sotheby’s profitability.
Industry Trends
In late-2009, the global art market began a period of expansion that has resulted in some of the most profitable years in Sotheby’s history, and the art market has remained strong to date. A significant driver of the expansion of the global art market and Sotheby’s profitability during this period has been the growth of the Contemporary and Asian art markets, as well as increased demand for art from clients in China and other emerging markets across several collecting categories.
As the global art market has grown, the value of the property sold by Sotheby's has increased and the competitive environment between Sotheby’s and Christie’s has intensified. These factors have resulted in a decline in auction commission margins over the past few years, with the competitive environment for high-value consignments causing an increase in the use of auction commission sharing arrangements and an increase in the use of auction guarantees, sometimes without the protection of irrevocable bids.
To help mitigate the recent decline in auction commission margins, in March 2013 and again in February 2015, management enacted increases in Sotheby’s buyer’s premium rate structure. (See "Auction Commission Margin" within the discussion of Agency segment results below.)
29#
To further leverage the growth of the global art market witnessed in recent years, Sotheby’s has developed its presence in emerging markets, particularly in China, and implemented initiatives to grow private sales, including the opening of dedicated private sale exhibition galleries in New York, London and Hong Kong, branded as S|2, that are focused on selling Contemporary Art.
Seasonality
The worldwide art auction market has two principal selling seasons, which generally occur in the second and fourth quarters of the year. In the aggregate, second and fourth quarter Net Auction Sales represented 79% and 83% of total Net Auction Sales in 2014 and 2013, respectively, with auction commission revenues comprising approximately 81% of Sotheby's total revenues in those years. Accordingly, Sotheby's financial results are seasonal, with peak revenues and operating income generally occurring in the second and fourth quarters. Consequently, first and third quarter results have historically reflected lower revenues when compared to the second and fourth quarters and, typically, a net loss due to the fixed nature of many of Sotheby's operating expenses. Management believes that investors should focus on results for six and twelve month periods, which better reflect the business cycle of the art auction market.
CONSOLIDATED RESULTS OF OPERATIONS FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2015
Overview
In the first quarter of 2015, Sotheby’s reported operating income of $18.4 million and Adjusted Operating Income* of $22.2 million, representing increases of $14.3 million and $12.4 million, respectively, when compared to the prior year. The increase in Adjusted Operating Income* is principally due to an 8% increase in auction commission revenues attributable to improved auction commission margins and 3% growth in Net Auction Sales. The comparison of first quarter Adjusted Operating Income* versus the prior year also benefits from the continued growth of the Finance segment loan portfolio, as well as a lower level of professional fees.
In the first quarter of 2015, Sotheby’s reported net income of $5.2 million, an $11.3 million improvement versus the ($6.1) million net loss reported in the prior year. This improvement is largely due to the factors discussed above, as well as a $3.1 million income tax charge recorded in the prior year quarter related to the enactment of new legislation in New York State.
Strategic Review
Sotheby's new Chief Executive Officer, Thomas S. Smith, Jr., has initiated a broad review of Sotheby's business, with the objective of implementing a multi-faceted growth strategy for the Company. Successful implementation of this strategy will require the building of talent and improvement of processes within the organization, as well as embracing technology so that it can be deployed more effectively both internally and through client-facing products. It will also require the effective allocation of capital in order to maximize shareholder value sustainably over time. In conjunction with this business review, management is reevaluating its expense projections for 2015 and is withdrawing expense guidance at this time.
With respect to return of capital, the Company may repurchase shares of Common Stock at any time under Sotheby’s existing $125 million share purchase authorization that was approved by the Board of Directors in January 2014. However, management and the Board of Directors are in the early stages of reviewing Sotheby’s growth options, and this review will occur over a number of months. Any share repurchases under this existing authorization will be subordinate to the requirements of Sotheby’s longer term growth needs and take into account market conditions.
(See Statement on Forward Looking Statements.)
___________________________________
* See "Non-GAAP Financial Measures" below for a description of this non-GAAP financial measure and a reconciliation to the most comparable GAAP measure.
30#
Results of Operations for the Three Months Ended March 31, 2015 and 2014
The table below presents a summary of Sotheby’s consolidated results of operations for the three months ended March 31, 2015 and 2014 (in thousands of dollars, except per share data):
Favorable /(Unfavorable) | |||||||||||||||
Three months ended March 31, | 2015 | 2014 | $ / % Change | % Change | |||||||||||
Revenues: | |||||||||||||||
Agency | $ | 127,882 | $ | 123,128 | $ | 4,754 | 4 | % | |||||||
Principal | 12,983 | 26,001 | (13,018 | ) | (50 | %) | |||||||||
Finance | 12,687 | 5,682 | 7,005 | * | |||||||||||
License fees | 1,974 | 1,697 | 277 | 16 | % | ||||||||||
Other | 149 | 303 | (154 | ) | (51 | %) | |||||||||
Total revenues | 155,675 | 156,811 | (1,136 | ) | (1 | %) | |||||||||
Expenses: | |||||||||||||||
Agency direct costs | 11,839 | 10,437 | (1,402 | ) | (13 | %) | |||||||||
Cost of Principal revenues | 11,713 | 24,502 | 12,789 | 52 | % | ||||||||||
Cost of Finance revenues | 3,388 | 710 | (2,678 | ) | * | ||||||||||
Marketing | 4,060 | 3,133 | (927 | ) | (30 | %) | |||||||||
Salaries and related | 62,930 | 65,756 | 2,826 | 4 | % | ||||||||||
General and administrative | 34,729 | 37,332 | 2,603 | 7 | % | ||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization | 4,782 | 5,147 | 365 | 7 | % | ||||||||||
CEO separation and transition costs (a) | 4,189 | — | (4,189 | ) | N/A | ||||||||||
Restructuring charges, net (b) | (359 | ) | — | 359 | N/A | ||||||||||
Special charges (c) | — | 5,703 | 5,703 | 100 | % | ||||||||||
Total expenses | 137,271 | 152,720 | 15,449 | 10 | % | ||||||||||
Operating income | 18,404 | 4,091 | 14,313 | * | |||||||||||
Net interest expense (d) | (8,532 | ) | (8,367 | ) | (165 | ) | (2 | %) | |||||||
Other expense | (1,959 | ) | (1,442 | ) | (517 | ) | (36 | %) | |||||||
Income (loss) before taxes | 7,913 | (5,718 | ) | 13,631 | N/A | ||||||||||
Equity in earnings of investees | 1,144 | 154 | 990 | * | |||||||||||
Income tax expense | 3,924 | 331 | (3,593 | ) | * | ||||||||||
Net income (loss) | 5,133 | (5,895 | ) | 11,028 | N/A | ||||||||||
Less: Net (loss) income attributable to noncontrolling interest | (69 | ) | 219 | (288 | ) | N/A | |||||||||
Net income (loss) attributable to Sotheby's | $ | 5,202 | $ | (6,114 | ) | $ | 11,316 | N/A | |||||||
Diluted earnings (loss) per share - Sotheby’s common shareholders | $ | 0.07 | $ | (0.09 | ) | $ | 0.16 | N/A | |||||||
Statistical Metrics: | |||||||||||||||
Aggregate Auction Sales (e) | $ | 895,443 | $ | 867,681 | $ | 27,762 | 3 | % | |||||||
Net Auction Sales (f) | $ | 755,817 | $ | 734,370 | $ | 21,447 | 3 | % | |||||||
Private Sales (g) | $ | 137,491 | $ | 147,350 | $ | (9,859 | ) | (7 | %) | ||||||
Consolidated Sales (h) | $ | 1,037,538 | $ | 1,019,891 | $ | 17,647 | 2 | % | |||||||
Adjusted Expenses (i) | $ | 118,340 | $ | 121,805 | $ | 3,465 | 3 | % | |||||||
Adjusted Operating Income (i) | $ | 22,234 | $ | 9,794 | $ | 12,440 | * | ||||||||
Adjusted Net Income (Loss) (i) | $ | 7,423 | $ | (2,977 | ) | $ | 10,400 | N/A | |||||||
Adjusted Diluted Earnings (Loss) Per Share (i) | $ | 0.11 | $ | (0.04 | ) | $ | 0.15 | N/A | |||||||
Effective income tax rate | 49.6% | (5.8%) | N/A | N/A | |||||||||||
31#
Legend: | |
* | Represents a change in excess of 100%. |
(a) | Includes compensation-related costs and professional fees associated with the hiring of Thomas S. Smith, Jr. as Sotheby's President and Chief Executive Officer. |
(b) | Relates to adjustments made to the accrual for employee termination benefits associated with the 2014 Restructuring Plan. |
(c) | Consists of expenses directly associated with issues related to shareholder activism and the resulting proxy contest with Third Point LLC ("Third Point"). |
(d) | Represents interest expense less interest income. |
(e) | Represents the total hammer price of property sold at auction plus buyer’s premium. |
(f) | Represents the total hammer price of property sold at auction. |
(g) | Represents the total purchase price of property sold in private sales brokered by Sotheby’s, including its commissions. |
(h) | Represents the sum of Aggregate Auction Sales, Private Sales, and Principal revenues. For the purposes of this calculation, the amount of Aggregate Auction Sales related to the sale of Principal segment inventory at Sotheby's auctions is eliminated. For the three months ended March 31, 2015 and 2014, such sales totaled $8.4 million and $21.1 million, respectively. |
(i) | See "Non-GAAP Financial Measures" below for a description of this non-GAAP financial measure and a reconciliation to the most comparable GAAP measure. |
32#
Agency Segment
The Agency segment earns commissions by matching buyers and sellers (also known as consignors) of authenticated fine art, decorative art, and jewelry (collectively, “art” or “works of art” or “artwork” or "property") through the auction or private sale process. The table below presents a summary of Agency segment gross profit and related statistical metrics for the three months ended March 31, 2015 and 2014 (in thousands of dollars):
Favorable /(Unfavorable) | |||||||||||||||
Three months ended March 31, | 2015 | 2014 | $ / % Change | % Change | |||||||||||
Agency revenues: | |||||||||||||||
Auction commissions | $ | 113,015 | $ | 104,673 | $ | 8,342 | 8 | % | |||||||
Private sale commissions | 11,458 | 13,055 | (1,597 | ) | (12 | %) | |||||||||
Auction guarantee and inventory activities | (751 | ) | 670 | (1,421 | ) | N/A | |||||||||
Other Agency revenues | 4,160 | 4,730 | (570 | ) | (12 | %) | |||||||||
Total Agency revenues | 127,882 | 123,128 | 4,754 | 4 | % | ||||||||||
Agency direct costs: | |||||||||||||||
Auction direct costs | 10,082 | 8,878 | (1,204 | ) | (14 | %) | |||||||||
Private sale expenses | 1,757 | 1,559 | (198 | ) | (13 | %) | |||||||||
Total Agency direct costs | 11,839 | 10,437 | (1,402 | ) | (13 | %) | |||||||||
Intersegment costs: | |||||||||||||||
Interest (a) | 901 | 2,035 | 1,134 | 56 | % | ||||||||||
Facility fees (b) | 424 | 498 | 74 | 15 | % | ||||||||||
Consignment fees (c) | 1,945 | 732 | (1,213 | ) | * | ||||||||||
Total intersegment costs | 3,270 | 3,265 | (5 | ) | — | % | |||||||||
Agency segment gross profit (d) | $ | 112,773 | $ | 109,426 | $ | 3,347 | 3 | % | |||||||
Statistical Metrics: | |||||||||||||||
Aggregate Auction Sales (e) | $ | 895,443 | $ | 867,681 | $ | 27,762 | 3 | % | |||||||
Net Auction Sales (f) | $ | 755,817 | $ | 734,370 | $ | 21,447 | 3 | % | |||||||
Items sold at auction with a hammer price greater than $1 million | 112 | 107 | 5 | 5 | % | ||||||||||
Total hammer price of items sold at auction with a hammer price greater than $1 million | $ | 476,883 | $ | 417,493 | $ | 59,390 | 14 | % | |||||||
Items sold at auction with a hammer price greater than $2 million | 64 | 61 | 3 | 5 | % | ||||||||||
Total hammer price of items sold at auction with a hammer price greater than $2 million | $ | 411,030 | $ | 349,675 | $ | 61,355 | 18 | % | |||||||
Items sold at auction with a hammer price greater than $3 million | 39 | 35 | 4 | 11 | % | ||||||||||
Total hammer price of items sold at auction with a hammer price greater than $3 million | $ | 348,500 | $ | 285,700 | $ | 62,800 | 22 | % | |||||||
Auction commission margin (g) | 15.0 | % | 14.3 | % | 0.7 | % | N/A | ||||||||
Auction direct costs as a percentage of Net Auction Sales | 1.33 | % | 1.21 | % | (0.12 | %) | N/A | ||||||||
Private Sales (h) | $ | 137,491 | $ | 147,350 | $ | (9,859 | ) | (7 | %) | ||||||
33#
Legend: | |||||||
* | Represents a change in excess of 100%. | ||||||
(a) | Represents interest charged by the Finance segment for secured loans issued with an interest rate below the Finance segment's target rate. Such loans are sometimes issued by the Finance segment as an accommodation to the Agency segment in order to obtain consigned property or enhance a client relationship. | ||||||
(b) | Represents facility fees charged by the Finance segment for secured loans where no facility fee is collected from the borrower. Facility fees are sometimes waived by the Finance segment in order to obtain consigned property or enhance a client relationship. | ||||||
(c) | Represents fees charged by the Finance segment for term loan collateral consigned to and sold at auction or privately during the period. The Finance segment began charging this fee effective January 1, 2015. Prior period segment results are presented on a comparable basis. | ||||||
(d) | The calculation of Agency segment gross profit does not include the impact of salaries and related costs, general and administrative expenses, and depreciation and amortization expense. However, these items are deducted in the determination of segment income before taxes as reported in Note 4 of Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements. | ||||||
(e) | Represents the total hammer price of property sold at auction plus buyer's premium. | ||||||
(f) | Represents the total hammer price of property sold at auction. | ||||||
(g) | Represents total auction commission revenues as a percentage of Net Auction Sales. | ||||||
(h) | Represents the total purchase price of property sold in private sales brokered by Sotheby's, including its commissions. | ||||||
Overview—For the three months ended March 31, 2015, Agency segment gross profit improved by $3.3 million (3%), principally due to an 8% increase in auction commission revenues resulting from an improvement in Auction Commission Margin from 14.3% to 15% and a higher level of Net Auction Sales. The overall improvement in Agency segment gross profit is partially offset by a decrease in private sale commissions of $1.6 million (12%) and an increase in auction direct costs as a percentage of Net Auction Sales from 1.21% to 1.33%. See the discussion below for an explanation of the significant factors impacting the comparison between the periods.
Auction Commission Revenues—In its role as auctioneer, Sotheby’s accepts property on consignment and matches sellers to buyers through the auction process. Sotheby’s invoices the buyer for the purchase price of the property (including the commission owed by the buyer), collects payment from the buyer, and remits to the seller the net sale proceeds after deducting its commissions, expenses and applicable taxes and royalties. Sotheby’s auction commissions include those paid by the buyer (“buyer’s premium”) and those paid by the seller (“seller’s commission”) (collectively, “auction commission revenue”), both of which are calculated as a percentage of Net Auction Sales.
For the three months ended March 31, 2015, auction commission revenues grew by $8.3 million (8%), due to an improvement in Auction Commission Margin from 14.3% to 15% and a $21.4 million (3%) increase in Net Auction Sales. Unfavorably impacting auction commission revenues during the period are changes in foreign currency exchange rates, which reduced the overall increase by approximately $6.9 million. Excluding the impact of foreign currency exchange rate changes, auction commission revenues increased $15.2 million (15%) for the three months ended March 31, 2015. See "Net Auction Sales" and "Auction Commission Margin" below for a more detailed discussion of these statistical metrics.
Net Auction Sales—For the three months ended March 31, 2015, Net Auction Sales improved $21.4 million (3%). Unfavorably impacting Net Auction Sales during the period are changes in foreign currency exchange rates, which reduced the overall increase by approximately $50.1 million. Excluding the impact of foreign currency exchange rate changes, Net Auction sales increased $71.5 million (10%) as a result of the performance in the following collecting categories (in millions of dollars):
Favorable /(Unfavorable) | |||||||||||||||
Three Months Ended March 31, | 2015 | 2014 | $ Change | % Change | |||||||||||
Impressionist and Modern Art | $ | 313.8 | $ | 291.9 | $ | 21.9 | 8 | % | |||||||
Contemporary Art | 271.4 | 175.3 | 96.1 | 55 | % | ||||||||||
Asian Art | 77.5 | 59.1 | 18.4 | 31 | % | ||||||||||
Old Master and British Paintings and Drawings | 68.3 | 66.7 | 1.6 | 2 | % | ||||||||||
Jewelry | 12.3 | 12.6 | (0.3 | ) | (2 | %) | |||||||||
Other fine art, decorative art and collectibles | 62.6 | 128.8 | (66.2 | ) | (51 | %) | |||||||||
Total | 805.9 | 734.4 | 71.5 | 10 | % | ||||||||||
Impact of foreign exchange rate changes | (50.1 | ) | N/A | N/A | N/A | ||||||||||
Total | $ | 755.8 | $ | 734.4 | $ | 21.4 | 3 | % | |||||||
34#
The increase in Contemporary Art is primarily due to the Bear Witness single-owner sale conducted in the first quarter of 2015 for which there were no comparably sized single-owner sales conducted in this category in the prior period. The decrease in other fine art, decorative art and collectibles is largely attributable to two significant single-owner sales conducted in the first quarter of 2014 for which there were no comparably sized single-owner sales in these categories in the current period.
Auction Commission Margin—Auction Commission Margin represents total auction commission revenues as a percentage of Net Auction Sales. Typically, Auction Commission Margin is higher for lower value works of art or collections, while higher valued property earns a lower Auction Commission Margin. Accordingly, Auction Commission Margin may be adversely impacted by the mix of property sold in a period. Auction Commission Margin may also be adversely impacted by arrangements whereby Sotheby's shares its buyer's premium with a consignor in order to secure a high-value consignment, as well as by Sotheby's use of auction guarantees. For example, when issuing an auction guarantee, Sotheby's may enter into a risk and reward sharing arrangement with a counterparty whereby Sotheby's financial exposure under the auction guarantee is reduced in exchange for sharing its buyer's premium. Also, in situations when guaranteed property sells for less than the guaranteed price, Sotheby's buyer's premium from that sale is used to reduce the loss on the transaction. (See Note 10 of Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for information related to Sotheby's use of auction guarantees.)
In order to enhance revenue and strengthen auction commission margins, on February 1, 2015, Sotheby’s enacted a new buyer's premium rate structure that is generally 25% on the first $200,000 of hammer (sale) price; 20% on the portion of hammer (sale) price above $200,000 up to and including $3 million; and 12% on any remaining amount above $3 million. The hammer (sale) price thresholds in other currencies have been adjusted in a commensurate manner. The previous buyer’s premium rate structure, which was in effect since March 15, 2013, was 25% on the first $100,000 of hammer (sale) price; 20% on the portion of hammer (sale) price above $100,000 up to and including $2 million; and 12% on any remaining amount above $2 million.
For the three months ended March 31, 2015, the increase in Auction Commission Margin is primarily due to the change in the buyer's premium rate structure enacted on February 1, 2015 and a lower level of buyer's premium shared with consignors, partially offset by the sales mix, as a greater proportion of Net Auction Sales occurred in the higher price bands of Sotheby's buyer's premium rate structure than in the prior period.
Private Sale Commission Revenues—Private sale commission revenues are earned through the direct brokering of purchases and sales of art. Private sales are initiated either by a client wishing to sell property with Sotheby's acting as its exclusive agent in the transaction, or by a prospective buyer who is interested in purchasing a certain work of art privately. Because private sales are individually negotiated non-recurring transactions, the volume and value of transactions completed can vary from period to period, with associated variability in revenues. For the three months ended March 31, 2015, private sale commissions decreased $1.6 million (12%) due to a lower volume of high-value transactions completed when compared to the same period in the prior year.
Auction Guarantee and Inventory Activities—Auction guarantee and inventory activities consists mainly of gains and losses related to auction guarantees, including: (i) Sotheby's share of overage or shortfall related to guaranteed property offered or sold at auction; (ii) writedowns to the carrying value of previously guaranteed property that initially failed to sell at auction, and (iii) recoveries and losses on the eventual sale of previously guaranteed property that initially failed to sell at auction.
For the three months ended March 31, 2015, the unfavorable variance in Sotheby's auction guarantee and inventory activities when compared to the prior period is primarily due to a higher level of inventory writedowns and a lower level of gains associated with guaranteed property offered at auction.
Other Agency Revenues—Other Agency revenues principally includes commissions and other fees earned by Sotheby's on sales brokered by third parties, fees charged to consignors for property withdrawn prior to auction, fees charged to clients for catalogue production and insurance, and catalogue subscription and advertising revenues. For the three months ended March 31, 2015, Other Agency revenues decreased $0.6 million (12%) primarily due to a $1.7 million fee earned by Sotheby's in the first quarter of 2014 on a sale brokered by a third party that was not repeated in the current period, partially offset by a higher level of property withdrawal and other fees earned in the current period.
35#
Agency Direct Costs—The table below presents a summary of Agency direct costs for the three months ended March 31, 2015 and 2014, as well as a comparison between the current and prior year periods (in thousands of dollars):
Favorable / (Unfavorable) | |||||||||||||||
Three months ended March 31, | 2015 | 2014 | $ / % Change | % Change | |||||||||||
Auction direct costs: | |||||||||||||||
Sale marketing | $ | 4,739 | $ | 3,886 | $ | (853 | ) | (22 | %) | ||||||
Shipping | 2,802 | 2,075 | (727 | ) | (35 | %) | |||||||||
Sale venue | 1,226 | 1,126 | (100 | ) | (9 | %) | |||||||||
Other | 1,315 | 1,791 | 476 | 27 | % | ||||||||||
Total auction direct costs | 10,082 | 8,878 | (1,204 | ) | (14 | %) | |||||||||
Private sale expenses | 1,757 | 1,559 | (198 | ) | (13 | %) | |||||||||
Total Agency direct costs | $ | 11,839 | $ | 10,437 | $ | (1,402 | ) | (13 | %) | ||||||
Statistical Metric: | |||||||||||||||
Auction direct costs as a % of Net Auction Sales | 1.33% | 1.21% | (0.12 | %) | N/A | ||||||||||
Auction Direct Costs—A large portion of auction direct costs relate to sale marketing expenses such as catalogue production and distribution, advertising and promotion costs, and traveling exhibition costs. Auction direct costs also include the cost of shipping property, sale venue costs, and other direct costs such as debit and credit card processing fees. The level of auction direct costs incurred in a period is generally dependent upon the volume and composition of Sotheby's auction sale offerings. For example, direct costs attributable to auctions of single-owner or other high-value collections are typically higher than those associated with standard various-owner auctions, mainly due to higher promotional costs for catalogues, special events, and traveling exhibitions, as well as higher shipping expenses.
For the three months ended March 31, 2015, changes in foreign currency exchange rates decreased Agency direct costs by approximately $0.8 million when compared to the prior period. Excluding the impact of foreign currency exchange rate changes, Agency direct costs increased $2.2 million (23%) primarily due to a higher level of costs incurred to promote and conduct Sotheby's Contemporary Art sales in London, including the Bear Witness single-owner sale discussed above.
Private Sale Expenses—Private sale expenses consist largely of sale marketing and exhibition costs. For the three months ended March 31, 2015, private sale expenses grew by $0.2 million (13%), primarily due to higher selling exhibition costs in Hong Kong.
Principal Segment
The activities of the Principal segment include the sale of artworks that have been purchased opportunistically by Sotheby's, including property acquired for sale at auction in the near term in lieu of the Agency segment providing an auction guarantee to a potential consignor. To a lesser extent, the activities of the Principal segment also include retail wine sales and the activities of Acquavella Modern Art, an equity investee. Also, under certain circumstances, the Principal segment provides secured loans to certain art dealers to finance the purchase of works of art. In these situations, Sotheby's acquires a partial ownership interest in the purchased property in addition to providing the loan. Upon its eventual sale, the loan is repaid and any profit or loss is shared by Sotheby's and the art dealer according to their respective ownership interests.
The Principal segment also holds the remaining inventory of Noortman Master Paintings ("NMP"), an art dealer that was owned and operated by Sotheby's from its acquisition in June 2006 until its closure in December 2013. As of March 31, 2015, the carrying value of NMP's remaining inventory was $5.3 million, representing a $5.6 million (51%) decrease when compared to March 31, 2014. Management is continuing to execute its plans for further sales of NMP’s remaining inventory.
36#
The table below summarizes Principal segment gross profit for the three months ended March 31, 2015 and 2014 (in thousands of dollars):
Favorable/(Unfavorable) | |||||||||||||||
Three months ended March 31, | 2015 | 2014 | $ Change | % Change | |||||||||||
Principal revenues | $ | 12,983 | $ | 26,001 | $ | (13,018 | ) | (50 | %) | ||||||
Cost of Principal revenues | (11,713 | ) | (24,502 | ) | 12,789 | 52 | % | ||||||||
Principal gross profit (a) | $ | 1,270 | $ | 1,499 | $ | (229 | ) | (15 | %) | ||||||
Legend: | |
(a) | The calculation of Principal segment gross profit does not include the impact of salaries and related costs, general and administrative expenses, and depreciation and amortization expense. However, these items are deducted in the determination of segment income (loss) before taxes as reported in Note 4 of Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements. |
The decrease in Principal revenues and cost of Principal revenues is largely due to sales of property acquired from a potential consignor in lieu of the Agency segment providing an auction guarantee in the first quarter of 2014, for which there were no comparable sales in the current period.
37#
Finance Segment
The Finance segment provides certain collectors and art dealers with financing secured by works of art that Sotheby's either has in its possession or permits borrowers to possess. The Finance segment generally makes two types of secured loans: (1) advances secured by consigned property where the borrowers are contractually committed, in the near term, to sell the property through the Agency segment of Sotheby's (a “consignor advance”); and (2) general purpose term loans secured by property not presently intended for sale (a “term loan”). Prior to 2014, the lending activities of the Finance segment were funded primarily by the operating cash flows of the Agency segment, with the ability to supplement those cash flows with revolving credit facility borrowings. In January 2014, in order to reduce the Finance segment's cost of capital and enhance returns, Sotheby's established a separate capital structure for the Finance segment through which client loans are predominantly funded with borrowings drawn from a dedicated revolving credit facility. The establishment of the Finance segment's dedicated revolving credit facility in February 2014 allowed management to debt fund a substantial portion of pre-existing loans and fund further growth of the loan portfolio. Cash balances are also used to fund a portion of the Finance segment loan portfolio, as appropriate. (See Note 5 of Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information related to Finance segment loans.)
The table below presents a summary of Finance segment gross profit and related statistical metrics as of and for the three months ended March 31, 2015 and 2014, as well as a comparison between the current and prior year periods (in thousands of dollars):
Favorable/(Unfavorable) | |||||||||||||||
Three months ended March 31, | 2015 | 2014 | $ / % Change | % Change | |||||||||||
Finance revenues: | |||||||||||||||
Client paid revenues: | |||||||||||||||
Interest | $ | 9,716 | $ | 5,161 | $ | 4,555 | 88 | % | |||||||
Fees | 2,971 | 521 | 2,450 | * | |||||||||||
Total client paid revenues | 12,687 | 5,682 | 7,005 | * | |||||||||||
Intersegment revenues: | |||||||||||||||
Interest (a) | 901 | 2,035 | (1,134 | ) | (56 | %) | |||||||||
Facility fees (b) | 424 | 498 | (74 | ) | (15 | %) | |||||||||
Consignment fees (c) | 1,945 | 732 | 1,213 | * | |||||||||||
Total intersegment revenues | 3,270 | 3,265 | 5 | — | % | ||||||||||
Total Finance revenues | 15,957 | 8,947 | 7,010 | 78 | % | ||||||||||
Cost of Finance revenues (d) | 3,388 | 710 | (2,678 | ) | * | ||||||||||
Finance segment gross profit (e) | $ | 12,569 | $ | 8,237 | $ | 4,332 | 53 | % | |||||||
Loan Portfolio Metrics: | |||||||||||||||
Loan Portfolio Balance (f) | $ | 699,847 | $ | 457,168 | $ | 242,679 | 53 | % | |||||||
Average Loan Portfolio (g) | $ | 677,638 | $ | 481,049 | $ | 196,589 | 41 | % | |||||||
Credit Facility Borrowings Outstanding (h) | $ | 501,500 | $ | 185,000 | $ | 316,500 | * | ||||||||
Average Credit Facility Borrowings (i) | $ | 472,872 | $ | 91,944 | $ | 380,928 | * | ||||||||
Average Equity in Loan Portfolio (j) | $ | 204,766 | $ | 389,105 | $ | 184,339 | 47 | % | |||||||
Finance Revenue Margin (k) | 9.4 | % | 7.4 | % | 2.0 | % | N/A | ||||||||
Finance Segment Leverage Ratio (l) | 71.7 | % | 40.5 | % | 36.5 | % | N/A | ||||||||
Finance Segment LTM Return on Equity (m) | 10.9 | % | N/A | N/A | N/A | ||||||||||
38#
Legend: | ||||
* | Represents a change in excess of 100%. | |||
(a) | Represents interest earned from the Agency segment for secured loans issued with an interest rate below the Finance segment's target rate. Such loans are sometimes issued by the Finance segment as an accommodation to the Agency segment in order to obtain consigned property or enhance a client relationship. | |||
(b) | Represents facility fees earned from the Agency segment for secured loans where a reduced or no facility fee is collected from the borrower. Facility fees are sometimes reduced or waived by the Finance segment as an accommodation to the Agency segment in order to obtain consigned property or enhance a client relationship. | |||
(c) | Represents fees earned from the Agency segment for Finance segment term loan collateral sold at auction or privately during the period. The Finance segment began charging this fee effective January 1, 2015. Prior period segment results are presented on a comparable basis. | |||
(d) | The cost of Finance revenues includes borrowing costs related to the Finance segment's dedicated revolving credit facility, including interest expense, commitment fees, and the amortization of amendment and arrangement fees. | |||
(e) | The calculation of Finance segment gross profit does not include the impact of salaries and related costs, general and administrative expenses, depreciation and amortization expense, and intercompany charges from Sotheby's global treasury function. However, these items are deducted in the determination of segment income before taxes as reported in Note 4 of Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements. | |||
(f) | Represents the period ending net loan portfolio balance for the Finance segment. | |||
(g) | Represents the average loan portfolio outstanding during the period. | |||
(h) | Represents the period ending balance of borrowings outstanding under the Finance segment's dedicated revolving credit facility. | |||
(i) | Represents average borrowings outstanding during the period under the Finance segment's dedicated revolving credit facility. | |||
(j) | Represents the average loan portfolio balance outstanding during the period less the average borrowings outstanding during the period under the Finance segment's dedicated revolving credit facility. | |||
(k) | Represents the annualized margin of total client paid and intersegment Finance revenues in relation to the Average Loan Portfolio. | |||
(l) | Calculated as Credit Facility Borrowings Outstanding divided by the Loan Portfolio Balance. | |||
(m) | Represents the return of Finance segment net income, excluding allocated corporate overhead costs, over the last twelve months ("LTM") in relation to the Average Equity in Loan Portfolio during that period. For the purposes of this calculation, income taxes are provided using Sotheby's consolidated effective tax rate for the period. On a pro-forma basis, assuming the current period-end Finance segment Leverage Ratio of 71.7%, the Finance segment LTM Return on Equity for the period ended March 31, 2015 would be 13.6%. This metric is not applicable for the LTM period ended March 31, 2014, as the debt funding of the Finance segment loan portfolio did not begin until February 2014. | |||
For three months ended March 31, 2015, the $4.3 million (53%) improvement in Finance segment gross profit reflects the continued growth of the client loan portfolio, which is attributable to a number of factors, including an increase in the demand for art-related financing, the increased ability to fund loans through revolving credit facility borrowings, the relatively low nominal interest rate environment, and the improved global reach of Sotheby's art-financing business. Finance segment results in the current period are also favorably impacted by a $1.3 million collateral withdrawal fee earned in the period. Intersegment revenues were flat when compared to the prior period as an increase in fees earned from the sale of term loan collateral through the Agency segment was offset by a lower balance of below target loans issued to Agency segment clients. The overall improvement in Finance segment gross profit is partially offset by the higher cost of revolving credit facility borrowings as management began the process of debt financing the loan portfolio after establishing the Finance segment's dedicated revolving credit facility on February 13, 2014. As a result of the increased demand for art-related financing and continued growth of the client loan portfolio, management is exploring an increase to the borrowing capacity under the Finance segment's dedicated revolving credit facility. (See statement on Forward Looking Statements.)
Marketing Expenses
Marketing expenses are costs related to the promotion of the Sotheby’s brand and include corporate advertising, Sotheby’s lifestyle magazines, client service initiatives, and strategic sponsorships of and charitable donations to cultural institutions. For the three months ended March 31, 2015, marketing expenses increased $0.9 million (30%) as a result of initiatives to enhance Sotheby's brand preeminence and accessibility.
39#
Salaries and Related Costs
For the three months ended March 31, 2015 and 2014, salaries and related costs consisted of the following (in thousands of dollars):
Favorable / (Unfavorable) | |||||||||||||||
Three months ended March 31, | 2015 | 2014 | $ Change | % Change | |||||||||||
Full-time salaries | $ | 36,776 | $ | 37,909 | $ | 1,133 | 3 | % | |||||||
Incentive compensation expense | 1,813 | 3,017 | 1,204 | 40 | % | ||||||||||
Share-based payment expense | 5,653 | 6,247 | 594 | 10 | % | ||||||||||
Payroll taxes | 5,606 | 6,592 | 986 | 15 | % | ||||||||||
Employee benefits | 8,903 | 6,680 | (2,223 | ) | (33 | %) | |||||||||
Other compensation expense | 4,179 | 5,311 | 1,132 | 21 | % | ||||||||||
Total salaries and related costs | $ | 62,930 | $ | 65,756 | $ | 2,826 | 4 | % | |||||||
For the three months ended March 31, 2015, changes in foreign currency exchange rates reduced salaries and related costs by $3.3 million when compared to the prior period. Excluding the impact of foreign currency exchange rate changes, salaries and related costs increased $0.5 million (1%) during the current period.
See below for a detailed discussion of the significant factors impacting the comparison of the various elements of salaries and related costs between the current and prior period.
Full-Time Salaries—For the three months ended March 31, 2015, full-time salaries decreased $1.1 million (3%) principally due to changes in foreign currency exchange rates ($1.9 million) and savings resulting from the restructuring plan enacted in July of 2014, partially offset by base salary increases and headcount reinvestments. Excluding the impact of foreign currency exchange rate changes, full-time salaries increased $0.8 million (2%) during the current period.
Incentive Compensation—Incentive compensation principally includes the expense associated with cash payments made under Sotheby's incentive compensation program. The amount of incentive compensation paid under this program is awarded based upon the recommendation of the Compensation Committee to the Board of Directors after assessing Sotheby's annual earnings, as measured by an EBITDA-based metric. In addition, incentive compensation includes amounts awarded to employees for brokering certain eligible private sale transactions under a formula established by the Compensation Committee and, to a much lesser extent, amounts awarded to employees with respect to other selling activities.
For the three months ended March 31, 2015, the decrease in incentive compensation expense is attributable to lower private sale incentive costs resulting from a decline in private sale revenues, as well as incentive compensation costs incurred in the prior year with respect to a higher level of other selling activities.
Share-Based Payment Expense—Share-based payment expense relates to the amortization of equity compensation awards such as performance share units, restricted stock units, restricted stock, and stock options. Equity compensation awards are granted annually in the first quarter of the year, primarily under Sotheby's incentive compensation program, with the annual award value generally dependent upon the level of Sotheby’s financial results for the prior year. The amount of compensation expense recognized for share-based payments is based on management’s estimate of the number of units or shares ultimately expected to vest as a result of employee service. In addition, for performance share units, the amount and timing of expense recognition is significantly impacted by management’s quarterly assessment of the likelihood and timing of achieving certain profitability targets.
For the three months ended March 31, 2015, share-based payment expense decreased $0.6 million (10%) largely due to a difference in the timing of equity compensation award issuances between the current and prior years, as 2015 equity compensation awards were granted later in the first quarter when compared to 2014. (See Note 12 of Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for more detailed information related to Sotheby’s share-based compensation programs.)
Payroll Taxes—For the three months ended March 31, 2015, payroll taxes decreased $1 million (15%) due to changes in foreign currency exchange rates, which contributed approximately $0.5 million to the reduction, and lower private sale incentive costs, as discussed above.
Employee Benefits—Employee benefits include the cost of Sotheby’s retirement plans and health and welfare programs, as well as certain employee severance costs. Sotheby’s material retirement plans include defined benefit and defined contribution pension plans for its employees in the U.K. and defined contribution and deferred compensation plans for its U.S. employees.
40#
Generally, the amount of employee benefit costs recognized in a period is dependent upon headcount and overall compensation levels, as well as Sotheby’s financial performance. Additionally, the level of expense related to Sotheby’s defined benefit pension plan in the U.K. is significantly influenced by interest rates, investment performance in the debt and equity markets, and actuarial assumptions. Also, the amount recorded in a period for Sotheby’s Deferred Compensation Plan (the “DCP”) is dependent upon changes in the fair value of the DCP liability resulting from gains and losses in deemed participant investments. Gains in deemed participant investments increase the DCP liability and, therefore, increase employee benefit costs. Losses in deemed participant investments decrease the DCP liability and, therefore, decrease employee benefit costs. On a consolidated basis, cost increases (decreases) related to the DCP liability are largely offset by market gains (losses) in the trust assets related to the DCP liability, which are reflected in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations within other expense.
For the three months ended March 31, 2015, employee benefit costs increased $2.2 million (33%) primarily due to a $0.9 million increase in non-restructuring related severance costs and higher pension costs in the U.K. and U.S. The higher pension costs include a $0.6 million increase in defined benefit pension costs in the U.K. (see Note 8 of Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements) and $0.3 million in accrued U.K. defined contribution plan profit-sharing costs. Beginning in 2015, Sotheby's may contribute an annual discretionary amount to the U.K. defined contribution plan, depending on Sotheby's profitability.
For the year ending December 31, 2015, the net cost associated with the U.K. defined benefit plan is expected to increase $2.3 million primarily due to a decrease in the assumption for the weighted average expected long-term rate of return on plan assets (from 6.1% to 5.4%) and an increase in the required amortization of prior year actuarial losses. (See statement on Forward Looking Statements.)
Other Compensation Expense—Other compensation expense typically includes the cost of certain retention-based, new-hire and other employment arrangements, as well as the cost of temporary labor and overtime. For the three months ended March 31, 2015, other compensation expense decreased $1.1 million (21%) primarily due to a lower level of amortization expense associated with retention-based employment arrangements.
41#
General and Administrative Expenses
For the three months ended March 31, 2015 and 2014, general and administrative expenses consisted of the following (in thousands of dollars):
Favorable /(Unfavorable) | |||||||||||||||
Three months ended March 31, | 2015 | 2014 | $ Change | % Change | |||||||||||
Professional fees: | |||||||||||||||
Operations | $ | 4,617 | $ | 5,262 | $ | 645 | 12 | % | |||||||
Legal and compliance | 3,255 | 4,101 | 846 | 21 | % | ||||||||||
Other (a) | 3,206 | 3,708 | 502 | 14 | % | ||||||||||
Total professional fees | 11,078 | 13,071 | 1,993 | 15 | % | ||||||||||
Facilities-related expenses | 10,684 | 11,363 | 679 | 6 | % | ||||||||||
Travel and entertainment | 6,575 | 6,150 | (425 | ) | (7 | %) | |||||||||
Telecommunication and technology | 2,037 | 2,211 | 174 | 8 | % | ||||||||||
Insurance | 1,284 | 1,344 | 60 | 4 | % | ||||||||||
Other indirect expenses | 3,071 | 3,193 | 122 | 4 | % | ||||||||||
Total general and administrative expenses | $ | 34,729 | $ | 37,332 | $ | 2,603 | 7 | % | |||||||
Legend: | ||||
(a) | Other professional fees include business consulting costs incurred to assist management in the analysis and development of business and operational strategies, Board of Director fees, and costs related to various administrative areas. | |||
For the three months ended March 31, 2015, changes in foreign currency exchange rates decreased general and administrative expenses by $1.5 million when compared to the prior period. Excluding the impact of foreign currency exchange rate changes, general and administrative expenses decreased $1.1 million (3%) during the period.
See below for a detailed discussion of the significant operating factors impacting the comparison of the various elements of general and administrative expenses between the current and prior period.
Professional fees (Operations)—Sotheby's incurs professional fees to outsource certain business functions such as catalogue production and its client contact management center, as well as for assistance with personnel recruiting, website maintenance and development, and other activities. For the three months ended March 31, 2015, this category of professional fees decreased $0.6 million (12%) primarily due to negotiated rate reductions related to outsourced functions and reduced usage of service providers in other areas.
Professional fees (Legal and Compliance)—Sotheby's incurs professional fees related to legal, audit and other compliance-related activities. For the three months ended March 31, 2015, this category of professional fees decreased $0.8 million (21%) primarily due to a lower level of legal costs.
Facilities-related expenses—Facilities-related expenses principally include rent expense, real estate taxes and other costs related to the operation, security and maintenance of Sotheby's worldwide premises. For the three months ended March 31, 2015, facilities-related expenses decreased $0.7 million (6%) most notably due to lower utility costs at Sotheby's New York headquarters, as well as changes in foreign currency exchange rates.
CEO Separation and Transition Costs
In the first quarter of 2015, Sotheby's recognized $4.2 million in costs associated with the hiring of Thomas S. Smith, Jr. as its President and Chief Executive Officer which are classified within CEO separation and transition costs. These costs principally relate to compensation of $3.1 million owed to Mr. Smith to replace incentive compensation that he expected to receive from his previous employer and consist of a fully vested restricted stock unit award with a fair value of $2 million granted on March 31, 2015 and a $1.1 million cash payment that is due in September 2015. There is no required service period associated with this compensation. CEO separation and transition costs also include approximately $1.1 million in recruitment and other professional fees associated with the CEO hiring process.
42#
Restructuring Charges
On July 16, 2014, Sotheby's Board of Directors approved a restructuring plan (the "2014 Restructuring Plan") principally impacting Sotheby's operations in the United States and the U.K. The 2014 Restructuring Plan resulted in Restructuring Charges (net) of approximately $14.2 million in 2014, consisting of $13.9 million in employee termination benefits recognized in the second half of 2014 and approximately $0.3 million in lease exit costs recognized in the fourth quarter of 2014. A large majority of the headcount reductions resulting from the 2014 Restructuring Plan have been completed and the remainder will occur by June 30, 2015. For the three months ended March 31, 2015, Sotheby's recognized a benefit in restructuring charges (net) of ($0.4) million related to adjustments to the accrual for employee termination benefits. As of March 31, 2015, Sotheby's has made payments of approximately $8.5 million related to the 2014 Restructuring Plan, and the related accrued liability has been reduced by $0.9 million as a result of foreign currency exchange rate changes. Accordingly, as of March 31, 2015, the remaining accrued liability related to the 2014 Restructuring Plan recorded on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets within accounts payable and accrued liabilities was $4.4 million. This liability is expected to be settled through cash payments to be made principally in the second quarter of 2015.
Special Charges
In the first quarter of 2014, Sotheby's recognized special charges of $5.7 million related to third party advisory, legal, and other professional service fees directly associated with issues related to shareholder activism and the resulting proxy contest with Third Point. (See Note 9 of Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for a summary of related legal actions.)
Income Tax Expense
The quarterly income tax provision is calculated using an estimated annual effective income tax rate for the period based on actual historical information and forward looking estimates. The estimated annual effective income tax rate may fluctuate due to changes in forecasted annual pre-tax income, changes in the jurisdictional mix of forecasted pre-tax income, and changes to actual or forecasted permanent book to tax differences (e.g., non-deductible expenses). Furthermore, the effective income tax rate may fluctuate as the result of positive or negative changes to the valuation allowance for net deferred tax assets, the impact of future tax settlements with federal, state or foreign tax authorities, or the impact of tax law changes. Management identifies items which are unusual and non-recurring in nature and treats these as discrete events. The tax effect of discrete items is booked entirely in the quarter in which the discrete event occurs.
As of March 31, 2015 and 2014, management’s estimate of Sotheby’s annual effective income tax rate, excluding discrete items, is approximately 36%. The estimated annual effective income tax rate for 2015 is higher than the U.S. statutory tax rate of 35% primarily because of state taxes and nondeductible expenses, partially offset by a benefit due to differences in foreign tax rates.
For the three months ended March 31, 2015, Sotheby’s effective income tax rate is approximately 50% compared to an effective income tax rate of (6%) for the three months ended March 31, 2014. The income tax rate for the current quarter is higher than the estimated annual effective income tax rate due to a discrete tax expense of $1 million related to the expected results of concluding income tax audits. In the prior period, income tax expense of $0.3 million was recorded on a pretax loss of ($5.7) million, primarily as a result of a discrete tax expense of $3.1 million recorded to reduce the value of certain deferred tax assets to reflect the enactment of the New York State 2014-2015 Budget Act.
On April 13, 2015, New York State Governor Andrew Cuomo signed legislation that reforms several provisions of the state’s revised corporate franchise tax, including legislation that reforms business taxes in New York City, retroactively to January 1, 2015. Sotheby’s anticipates that the legislation will reduce the amount of taxable income apportioned to New York City, thereby reducing its state effective tax rate beginning in the second quarter of 2015, the period of enactment. Management does not expect the legislation to have a material impact on Sotheby’s forecasted worldwide annual effective tax rate subsequent to the period of enactment. Sotheby’s will record a discrete tax expense of approximately $4 million in the second quarter of 2015 to reduce the value of certain deferred tax assets to the amount that will be recognized in the future as a result of the anticipated reduction of the New York City effective income tax rate. (See statement on Forward Looking Statements.)
Impact of Changes in Foreign Currency Exchange Rates
For the three months ended March 31, 2015, foreign currency exchange rates had a net unfavorable impact of approximately $2 million on Sotheby's operating income when compared to the prior period, with revenues unfavorably impacted by $8 million and expenses favorably impacted by $6 million.
43#
USE OF NON-GAAP FINANCIAL MEASURES
GAAP refers to generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America. Included in Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (or “MD&A”) are financial measures presented in accordance with GAAP and also on a non-GAAP basis. In MD&A, Sotheby’s presents Adjusted Expenses, Adjusted Operating Income, Adjusted Net Income (Loss), and Adjusted Diluted Earnings (Loss) Per Share, which are supplemental financial measures that are not required by or presented in accordance with GAAP. Sotheby's definition of these non-GAAP financial measures is provided in the following paragraphs.
Adjusted Expenses is defined as total expenses excluding the cost of Principal revenues, the cost of Finance revenues, CEO separation and transition costs, restructuring charges (net), and special charges. Adjusted Operating Income is defined as operating income excluding CEO separation and transition costs, restructuring charges (net), and special charges. Adjusted Net Income (Loss) is defined as net income (loss) attributable to Sotheby's, excluding after-tax CEO separation and transition costs, restructuring charges (net), and special charges. Adjusted Diluted Earnings (Loss) Per Share is defined as diluted (loss) earnings per share excluding the per share impact of CEO separation and transition costs, restructuring charges (net), and special charges.
Adjusted Expenses is used by the Board of Directors and management to assess Sotheby’s cost structure when compared to prior periods and on a forward-looking basis, particularly in evaluating performance against management's cost control initiatives. Accordingly, Adjusted Expenses allows investors to assess Sotheby's performance on the same basis as the Board of Directors and management. Adjusted Expenses provides insight into Sotheby's ongoing cost structure, absent unusual items, as well as the volatility associated with the cost of Principal revenues, which is unpredictable and can vary significantly from one period to the next.
Adjusted Operating Income, Adjusted Net Income (Loss), and Adjusted Diluted Earnings (Loss) Per Share are important supplemental measures used by the Board of Directors and management in their financial and operational decision making processes, for internal reporting, and as part of Sotheby’s forecasting and budgeting processes as they provide helpful measures of Sotheby’s core operations. These measures allow the Board of Directors and management to view operating trends, perform analytical comparisons, and benchmark performance between periods. Management also believes that these measures may be used by securities analysts, investors, financial institutions, and other interested parties in their evaluation of Sotheby's.
Management cautions users of Sotheby's financial statements that amounts presented in accordance with its definitions of these non-GAAP financial measures may not be comparable to similar measures disclosed by other companies because not all companies and analysts calculate such measures in the same manner.
The following is a reconciliation of total expenses to Adjusted Expenses for the three months ended March 31, 2015 and 2014 (in thousands of dollars):
Three months ended March 31, | 2015 | 2014 | |||||||
Total expenses | $ | 137,271 | $ | 152,720 | |||||
Subtract: Cost of Principal revenues | 11,713 | 24,502 | |||||||
Subtract: Cost of Finance revenues | 3,388 | 710 | |||||||
Subtract: CEO separation and transition costs | 4,189 | — | |||||||
Subtract: Restructuring charges, net | (359 | ) | — | ||||||
Subtract: Special charges | — | 5,703 | |||||||
Adjusted Expenses | $ | 118,340 | — | $ | 121,805 | ||||
The following is a reconciliation of operating income to Adjusted Operating Income for the three months ended March 31, 2015 and 2014 (in thousands of dollars):
Three months ended March 31, | 2015 | 2014 | ||||||
Operating income | $ | 18,404 | $ | 4,091 | ||||
Add: CEO separation and transition costs | 4,189 | — | ||||||
Add: Restructuring charges, net | (359 | ) | — | |||||
Add: Special charges | — | 5,703 | ||||||
Adjusted Operating Income | $ | 22,234 | $ | 9,794 | ||||
44#
The following is a reconciliation of net income (loss) attributable to Sotheby's to Adjusted Net Income (Loss) for the three months ended March 31, 2015 and 2014 (in thousands of dollars):
Three months ended March 31, | 2015 | 2014 | ||||||
Net income (loss) attributable to Sotheby's | $ | 5,202 | $ | (6,114 | ) | |||
Add: CEO separation and transition costs, net of tax | 2,446 | — | ||||||
Add: Restructuring charges (net), net of tax | (225 | ) | — | |||||
Add: Special charges, net of tax | — | 3,137 | ||||||
Adjusted Net Income (Loss) | $ | 7,423 | $ | (2,977 | ) | |||
The following is a reconciliation of diluted earnings (loss) per share to Adjusted Diluted Earnings (Loss) Per Share for the three months ended March 31, 2015 and 2014 (in thousands of dollars):
Three months ended March 31, | 2015 | 2014 | ||||||
Diluted earnings (loss) per share | $ | 0.07 | $ | (0.09 | ) | |||
Add: Per share impact of CEO separation and transition costs | 0.04 | — | ||||||
Add: Per share impact of restructuring charges, net | — | — | ||||||
Add: Per share impact of special charges | — | 0.05 | ||||||
Adjusted Diluted Earnings (Loss) Per Share | $ | 0.11 | $ | (0.04 | ) | |||
45#
CASH FLOWS FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2015 AND 2014
This discussion should be read in conjunction with Sotheby’s Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows. For the three months ended March 31, 2015, total cash and cash equivalents decreased $312.8 million to $381.1 million, as compared to a decrease of $399.1 million to $322.2 million for the three months ended March 31, 2014, primarily due to the factors discussed below.
Net Cash Used by Operating Activities—Sotheby's is predominantly an agency business that collects and remits cash on behalf of its clients. Accordingly, the net amount of cash provided or used in a period by Sotheby's operating activities is significantly influenced by the timing of auction and private sale settlements. As discussed in Note 5 of Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements, under Sotheby’s standard auction payment terms, payments from buyers are due no more than 30 days from the sale date and payments to consignors are due 35 days from the sale date. Accordingly, it is not unusual for Sotheby's to hold significant balances of consignor net sale proceeds at the end of a quarterly accounting period that are disbursed soon thereafter. Additionally, Sotheby's sometimes provides extended payment terms to auction and private sale buyers and the level of such extended payment terms for auctions can vary considerably from selling season to selling season. In certain of these situations, the consignor may be paid the net sale proceeds before payment is collected from the buyer, with the collection from the buyer sometimes occurring after the current balance sheet date. The amount of net cash provided or used by Sotheby's operating activities in a reporting period is also a function of its net income or loss, the timing of payments made to vendors, the timing of compensation-related payments, and the timing of the collection and/or payment of tax-related receivables and payables.
Net cash used by operating activities of $277.4 million for the three months ended March 31, 2015 is principally the result of net cash outflows of $147.9 million associated with the settlement of auction and private sale transactions during the period. This net cash outflow is particularly influenced by the payment of net sale proceeds to certain consignors for property sold in Sotheby's first quarter 2015 London auctions and fourth quarter 2014 auctions in New York in advance of collecting the purchase price from buyers. Cash flows from operating activities are also impacted by the funding of approximately $62 million of 2014 incentive compensation payments, the funding of inventory acquisitions that will be offered at auction in the second quarter of 2015, and approximately $19 million in income tax payments.
Net cash used by operating activities of $268.1 million for the three months ended March 31, 2014 was principally the result of net cash outflows of $183.8 million associated with the settlement of auction and private sale transactions during the period as sales proceeds collected from buyers late in 2013 were paid to consignors early in 2014. Net cash used by operating activities in the first quarter of 2014 was also influenced by the payment of net sale proceeds to certain consignors in advance of collecting payment from the buyer. Also contributing to the net cash used by operating activities in the quarter was the funding of approximately $55 million of 2013 incentive and other compensation payments and approximately $24 million of income tax payments.
Net Cash (Used ) Provided by Investing Activities—Net cash used by investing activities of $65.1 million for the three months ended March 31, 2015 is principally the result of the net funding of client loans of $51.5 million and Sotheby's acquisition of a 25% ownership interest in RM Auctions for $30.7 million (see Note 7 of Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements). These investing cash outflows are partially offset by a $17.8 million decrease in restricted cash as a result of the payment of net sale proceeds to consignors in certain foreign countries where auction houses are legally required to maintain consignor funds in segregated accounts.
Net cash provided by investing activities of $26 million for the three months ended March 31, 2014 was principally attributable to net collections of client loans of $13.1 million and a $14.6 million decrease in restricted cash as a result of the payment of net sale proceeds to consignors in certain foreign countries where auction houses are legally required to maintain consignor funds in segregated accounts.
Net Cash Provided (Used) by Financing Activities—Net cash provided by financing activities of $38.3 million for the three months ended March 31, 2015 is largely due to $56.5 million in net borrowings under the Finance segment's dedicated revolving credit facility, partially offset by dividend and dividend equivalent payments of $9.5 million, and the funding of employee tax obligations related to share-based payments of $8.9 million.
Net cash used by financing activities of $157.8 million for the three months ended March 31, 2014 reflects the payment of a $300 million special dividend, Common Stock repurchases of $25 million, and quarterly dividend payments of $6.9 million, partially offset by cash inflows of $185 million from borrowings under the Finance segment's dedicated revolving credit facility.
46#
CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS AND COMMITMENTS
The following table summarizes Sotheby’s material contractual obligations and commitments as of March 31, 2015 (in thousands of dollars):
Payments Due by Period | |||||||||||||||||||
Total | Less Than One Year | 1 to 3 Years | 3 to 5 Years | After 5 Years | |||||||||||||||
Debt (a): | |||||||||||||||||||
York Property Mortgage: | |||||||||||||||||||
Principal payments | $ | 219,534 | $ | 219,534 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | |||||||||
Interest payments | 4,073 | 4,073 | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||
Sub-total | 223,607 | 223,607 | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||
2022 Senior Notes: | |||||||||||||||||||
Principal payments | 300,000 | — | — | — | 300,000 | ||||||||||||||
Interest payments | 126,000 | 15,750 | 31,500 | 31,500 | 47,250 | ||||||||||||||
Sub-total | 426,000 | 15,750 | 31,500 | 31,500 | 347,250 | ||||||||||||||
Revolving credit facility borrowings | 501,500 | — | — | 501,500 | — | ||||||||||||||
Total debt and interest payments | 1,151,107 | 239,357 | 31,500 | 533,000 | 347,250 | ||||||||||||||
Other commitments: | |||||||||||||||||||
Operating lease obligations (b) | 90,157 | 17,103 | 25,677 | 10,005 | 37,372 | ||||||||||||||
Compensation arrangements (c) | 22,049 | 11,012 | 8,007 | 3,030 | — | ||||||||||||||
Auction guarantees (d) | 176,912 | 176,912 | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||
Unfunded loan commitments (e) | 30,241 | 30,241 | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||
Uncertain tax positions (f) | — | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||
Total other commitments | 319,359 | 235,268 | 33,684 | 13,035 | 37,372 | ||||||||||||||
Total | $ | 1,470,466 | $ | 474,625 | $ | 65,184 | $ | 546,035 | $ | 384,622 | |||||||||
(a) | See Note 6 of Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for information related to the York Property Mortgage, the 2022 Senior Notes, and Sotheby's revolving credit facility. The York Property Mortgage matures on July 1, 2035, but has an optional pre-payment date of July 1, 2015 and bears an annual rate of interest of approximately 5.6%, which increases to 10.6% subsequent to July 1, 2015 unless the mortgage is repaid by that date. Management is currently exploring its options with respect to a long-term refinancing of the York Property Mortgage, with the intent of completing such a refinancing no later than July 1, 2015. Accordingly, the York Property Mortgage is classified as a current liability on Sotheby's Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet as of March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014, as well as in the table above. (See statement on Forward Looking Statements.) |
(b) | These amounts represent the undiscounted future minimum rental commitments under non-cancellable operating leases. |
(c) | These amounts represent the remaining commitment for future salaries and other cash compensation, excluding any participation in Sotheby’s incentive compensation and share-based payment programs, related to compensation arrangements with certain senior employees. (See Note 9 of Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.) |
(d) | Represents the amount of auction guarantees outstanding ($201.9 million) net of amounts advanced ($25 million) as of March 31, 2015. (See Note 10 of Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for information related to auction guarantees.) |
(e) | Represents unfunded commitments to extend additional credit through Sotheby's Finance segment. (See Note 5 of Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for information related to Sotheby's Finance segment loan portfolio.) |
(f) | Excludes the $22.1 million liability recorded for uncertain tax positions that would be settled by cash payments to the respective taxing authorities, which are classified as long-term liabilities in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet as of March 31, 2015. This liability is excluded from the table above because management is unable to make reliable estimates of the period of settlement with the respective taxing authorities. (See Note 17 of Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for more detailed information related to uncertain tax positions.) |
47#
OFF-BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS
For information related to off-balance sheet arrangements see: (i) Note 5 of Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements, which discusses unfunded Finance segment loan commitments, (ii) Note 9 of Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements, which discusses guarantee of collection arrangements, and (iii) Note 10 of Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements, which discusses auction guarantees.
CONTINGENCIES
For information related to contingencies see: (i) Note 9 of Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements, which discusses legal contingencies, (ii) Note 10 of Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements, which discusses auction guarantees, and (iii) Note 17 of Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements, which discusses income tax contingencies.
UNCERTAIN TAX POSITIONS
For information related to uncertain tax positions, see Note 17 of Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Overview—Sotheby's continues to have strong liquidity with significant cash balances and $328.6 million in available borrowings under its revolving credit facility. As of March 31, 2015, cash and cash equivalents totaled $381.1 million, with $47.2 million held in the U.S. and $333.9 million held by foreign subsidiaries. As of March 31, 2015, Sotheby's also held $11.5 million of restricted cash that is almost entirely in certain foreign jurisdictions where there is a legal requirement for auction houses to maintain consignor funds in segregated accounts. After taking into account funds held that are due to consignors, management estimates that approximately $309.2 million of Sotheby's total cash and cash equivalents is available to support its capital needs, which include its current business requirements, the pursuit of business opportunities and growth initiatives, and to ensure appropriate liquidity for a market downturn that could occur due to the cyclical nature of the global art market. The current focus of Sotheby’s cash investment policy is to preserve principal and ensure liquidity. Accordingly, Sotheby's cash balances are primarily invested in the highest rated overnight deposits.
Based on its current projections and planned uses of foreign cash balances, management believes that foreign earnings accumulated through December 31, 2013 will be indefinitely reinvested outside of the U.S. and will not be needed to fund Sotheby's U.S. operations or commitments. However, based on these plans and projections, for years beginning in 2014, management believes that the earnings of its foreign subsidiaries will not be indefinitely reinvested outside of the U.S. (See statement on Forward Looking Statements.)
Revolving Credit Facilities—Sotheby's has a credit agreement with an international syndicate of lenders led by General Electric Capital Corporation. This credit agreement provides for separate dedicated revolving credit facilities for the Agency segment (the “Agency Credit Agreement”) and the Finance segment (the “Finance Credit Agreement”) (collectively, the “Credit Agreements”). The Credit Agreements have a maturity date of August 22, 2019.
The Agency Credit Agreement provides for an asset-based revolving credit facility the proceeds of which may be used primarily for the working capital and other general corporate needs of the Agency segment. The Finance Credit Agreement provides for an asset-based revolving credit facility the proceeds of which may be used primarily for the working capital and other general corporate needs of the Finance segment, including the funding of client loans. The Credit Agreements allow Sotheby's to transfer the proceeds of borrowings under each of the revolving credit facilities between the Agency and Finance segments.
The maximum aggregate borrowing capacity of the Credit Agreements, which is subject to a borrowing base, is $850 million, with $300 million committed to the Agency segment and $550 million committed to the Finance segment. The borrowing capacity of the Credit Agreements includes a $50 million incremental revolving credit facility with higher advance rates against certain assets and higher commitment and borrowing costs (the "Incremental Facility"). The Incremental Facility has a maturity date of August 21, 2015, which may be extended for an additional 365 days on an annual basis with the consent of the lenders who agree to extend their commitments under the Incremental Facility.
48#
The Credit Agreements have a sub-limit of $200 million for borrowings in the U.K. and Hong Kong, with up to $50 million available for foreign borrowings under the Agency Credit Agreement and up to $150 million available for foreign borrowings under the Finance Credit Agreement. The Credit Agreements also include an accordion feature, which allows Sotheby’s to seek an increase to the combined borrowing capacity of the Credit Agreements until February 23, 2019 by an amount not to exceed $100 million in the aggregate.
The borrowing base under the Agency Credit Agreement is determined by a calculation that is primarily based upon a percentage of the carrying values of certain auction guarantee advances, a percentage of the carrying value of certain inventory, a percentage of the carrying value of certain extended payment term receivables arising from auction or private sale transactions, and the fair value of certain of Sotheby's trademarks. The borrowing base under the Finance Credit Agreement is determined by a calculation that is primarily based upon a percentage of the carrying values of certain loans in the Finance segment loan portfolio and the fair value of certain of Sotheby's trademarks.
The obligations under the Credit Agreements are cross-guaranteed and cross-collateralized. Domestic borrowers are jointly and severally liable for all obligations under the Credit Agreements and, subject to certain limitations, borrowers in the U.K. and Sotheby's Hong Kong Limited, are jointly and severally liable for all obligations of the foreign borrowers under the Credit Agreements. In addition, the obligations of the borrowers under the Credit Agreements are guaranteed by certain of their subsidiaries. Sotheby's obligations under the Credit Agreements are secured by liens on all or substantially all of the personal property of the entities that are borrowers and guarantors under the Credit Agreements.
The Credit Agreements contain certain customary affirmative and negative covenants including, but not limited to, limitations on capital expenditures, a $600 million limitation on net outstanding auction guarantees (i.e., auction guarantees less the impact of related risk and reward sharing arrangements), and limitations on the use of proceeds from borrowings under the Credit Agreements. However, the Credit Agreements do not limit dividend payments and Common Stock repurchases provided that, both before and after giving effect thereto: (i) there are no events of default, (ii) the aggregate available borrowing capacity equals or exceeds $100 million, and (iii) the Liquidity Amount, as defined in the Credit Agreements, equals or exceeds $200 million. The Credit Agreements also contain certain financial covenants, which are only applicable during certain defined compliance periods. These financial covenants were not applicable for the twelve month period ended March 31, 2015.
Sotheby’s has incurred aggregate fees of approximately $18.5 million in conjunction with the establishment of and subsequent amendments to its credit agreement with General Electric Capital Corporation. These fees are being amortized on a straight-line basis through the August 22, 2019 maturity date of the Credit Agreements.
49#
The following tables summarize information relevant to the Credit Agreements as of and for the periods ended March 31, 2015, December 31, 2014, and March 31, 2014 (in thousands of dollars):
As of and for the Three Months Ended March 31, 2015 | Agency Credit Agreement | Finance Credit Agreement | Total | |||||||||
Maximum borrowing capacity (a) | $ | 300,000 | $ | 550,000 | $ | 850,000 | ||||||
Borrowing base | $ | 280,107 | $ | 550,000 | $ | 830,107 | ||||||
Borrowings outstanding | $ | — | $ | 501,500 | $ | 501,500 | ||||||
Available borrowing capacity (b) | $ | 280,107 | $ | 48,500 | $ | 328,607 | ||||||
Average borrowings outstanding | $ | — | $ | 472,872 | $ | 472,872 | ||||||
Borrowing Costs | $ | 706 | $ | 3,388 | $ | 4,094 | ||||||
As of and for the Year Ended December 31, 2014 | Agency Credit Agreement | Finance Credit Agreement | Total | |||||||||
Maximum borrowing capacity (a) | $ | 300,000 | $ | 550,000 | $ | 850,000 | ||||||
Borrowing base | $ | 237,830 | $ | 519,255 | $ | 757,085 | ||||||
Borrowings outstanding | $ | — | $ | 445,000 | $ | 445,000 | ||||||
Available borrowing capacity (b) | $ | 237,830 | $ | 74,255 | $ | 312,085 | ||||||
Average borrowings outstanding | $ | — | $ | 306,448 | $ | 306,448 | ||||||
Borrowing Costs | $ | 2,240 | $ | 8,740 | $ | 10,980 | ||||||
As of and for the Three Months Ended March 31, 2014 | Agency Credit Agreement | Finance Credit Agreement | Total | |||||||||
Maximum borrowing capacity (a) | $ | 150,000 | $ | 450,000 | $ | 600,000 | ||||||
Borrowing base | $ | 74,004 | $ | 286,077 | $ | 360,081 | ||||||
Borrowings outstanding | $ | — | $ | 185,000 | $ | 185,000 | ||||||
Available borrowing capacity (b) | $ | 74,004 | $ | 101,077 | $ | 175,081 | ||||||
Average borrowings outstanding | $ | — | $ | 91,944 | $ | 91,944 | ||||||
Borrowing Costs | $ | 597 | $ | 710 | $ | 1,307 | ||||||
(a) In August 2014, the Credit Agreements were amended and restated to, among other things, increase the maximum borrowing capacity of the Credit Agreements from $600 million to $850 million.
(b) The available borrowing capacity is calculated as the borrowing base less borrowings outstanding.
For the three months ended March 31, 2015 and 2014, borrowing costs related to the Finance Credit Agreement include interest of $3.2 million and $0.5 million, respectively, and fee amortization of $0.2 million and $0.2 million, respectively. For the year ended December 31, 2014, borrowing costs related to the Finance Credit Agreement include interest of $7.7 million and fee amortization of $1 million. Such borrowing costs are reflected in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations as the cost of Finance revenues. For the three months ended March 31, 2015 and 2014, the weighted average cost of borrowings related to the Finance Credit Agreement was approximately 2.9% and 3.1%, respectively. For the year ended December 31, 2014, he weighted average cost of borrowings related to the Finance Credit Agreement was approximately 2.9%.
Borrowing costs related to the Agency Credit Agreement, which include interest and fee amortization, are reflected in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations as interest expense. (See Note 6 of Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information related to interest expense associated with the Agency Credit Agreement.)
50#
Assessment of Liquidity and Capital Requirements—Sotheby's has separate capital structures and financial policies for its Agency and Finance segments. The Agency segment generally relies on existing cash balances (including amounts collected on behalf of and owed to consignors), operating cash flows, and revolving credit facility borrowings, if needed, to meet its liquidity and capital requirements. The timing and extent of any revolving credit facility borrowings by the Agency segment is dependent upon a number of factors including, but not limited to, the cyclical nature of the global art market, the seasonality of the art auction market, the timing of auction and private sale settlements, the potential funding of auction guarantees, the pursuit of business opportunities and growth initiatives, and the geographic mix of cash and cash equivalent balances.
The Finance segment predominantly relies on revolving credit facility borrowings to fund client loans. To a lesser extent, cash balances are also used to fund a portion of the Finance segment loan portfolio, as appropriate. The timing and extent of revolving credit facility borrowings by the Finance segment is dependent upon a number of factors including, but not limited to, the demand for art-related financing, which can be significantly influenced by overall economic conditions and by the often unpredictable financial requirements of owners of major art collections, the timing of the funding of new client loans, and the timing of the settlement of existing client loans.
Sotheby’s short-term operating needs and capital requirements include the funding of net sales proceeds to consignors when unmatched extended payment terms are granted to auction and private sale buyers (see Note 5 of Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements), the potential funding of auction guarantees, the funding of potential inventory purchases, the funding of client loans, the potential repayment of revolving credit facility borrowings, the funding of capital expenditures, the funding of possible business initiatives and/or investments, the payment of quarterly dividends, and the funding of potential Common Stock repurchases, as well as the funding of the other short-term commitments due on or before March 31, 2016, as summarized in the table of contractual obligations and commitments above. (See statement on Forward Looking Statements.)
Sotheby’s long-term operating needs and capital requirements include the funding of net sales proceeds to consignors when unmatched extended payment terms are granted to auction and private sale buyers (see Note 5 of Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements), the potential funding of auction guarantees, the funding of potential inventory purchases, the funding of client loans, the repayment of revolving credit facility borrowings, the funding of capital expenditures, the funding of possible business initiatives and/or investments, the payment of potential quarterly dividends, and the funding of potential Common Stock repurchases, as well as the funding of the presently anticipated long-term contractual obligations and commitments summarized in the table of contractual obligations and commitments above. (See statement on Forward Looking Statements.)
Management believes that operating cash flows, existing cash balances and revolving credit facility borrowings will be adequate to meet Sotheby’s anticipated short-term and long-term commitments, operating needs and capital requirements through the August 22, 2019 expiration of the Credit Agreements. Management is exploring an increase to the borrowing capacity under the Finance Credit Agreement. (See statement on Forward Looking Statements.)
FUTURE IMPACT OF RECENTLY ISSUED ACCOUNTING STANDARDS
See Note 19 of Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for a discussion of recently issued accounting standards.
PREMISES UPDATE
Management has performed a review of its real estate holdings, including the York Property in New York and the New Bond Street premises in London. The results of this review will be further evaluated by the Board in consultation with Sotheby's new CEO after taking into account the strategic and operating requirements for these locations.
STRATEGIC PARTNERSHIP WITH eBAY
In July 2014, Sotheby’s and eBay announced a strategic partnership that presents Sotheby’s traditional live auctions on eBay. In April 2015, Sotheby’s became the preeminent anchor tenant of eBay's Live Auctions channel and began the live streaming of auctions on a platform that allows eBay's clients to bid real-time in select Sotheby's auctions from anywhere around the world. Currently, only Sotheby’s New York sales are featured on eBay, with plans to include Sotheby’s other global salesrooms. Management believes this strategic partnership will attract a number of potential new clients over time while extending Sotheby's brand to millions of eBay clients globally. (See statement on Forward Looking Statements.)
51#
LEGISLATION
In July 2010, the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (the “Dodd-Frank Act”) was signed into law in the U.S. This legislation significantly changed the banking and financial institution regulatory structure and impacted the lending, deposit, investment, trading and operating activities of such financial institutions. Management continues to review the provisions of the Dodd-Frank Act as they are finalized, and to assess its impact on Sotheby’s operations. This legislation has not had, nor does management believe it will have, a material impact on Sotheby's business. (See statement on Forward Looking Statements.)
Over the past year, there have been a number of Federal and State policy changes that impact the import, sale and export of objects containing ivory and other endangered species material. Sotheby’s continues to engage with Federal and State legislators and regulators to ensure the preservation of the existing exemption for antique artworks, furniture and other collectibles containing such material. Although Sotheby’s faces some new limitations in its ability to transact with property containing endangered species, management does not believe that the changes effected to date will have a material impact on Sotheby’s business, results of operations, financial condition, or cash flows. (See statement on Forward Looking Statements.)
FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS
This Form 10-Q contains certain forward looking statements; as such term is defined in Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, relating to future events and the financial performance of Sotheby’s. Such statements are only predictions and involve risks and uncertainties, resulting in the possibility that the actual events or performance will differ materially from such predictions. Major factors which could cause the actual results to differ materially from the predicted results in the forward looking statements include, but are not limited to, the factors listed below under Part II, Item 1A, “Risk Factors,” which are not ranked in any particular order.
ITEM 3: QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
Sotheby's continually evaluates the market risk associated with its financial instruments in the normal course of its business. As of March 31, 2015, Sotheby's material financial instruments include: (i) cash and cash equivalents, (ii) restricted cash, (iii) notes receivable, (iv) credit facility borrowings, (v) the York Property Mortgage, (vi) long-term debt, (vii) the DCP liability and related trust assets, and (viii) outstanding forward exchange contracts. (See Note 5 of Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for information related to notes receivable. See Note 6 of Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for information related to the credit facility borrowings, the York Property Mortgage, and long-term debt.)
Management believes that the interest rate risk associated with its financial instruments is minimal as a hypothetical 10% increase or decrease in interest rates is immaterial to its cash flow, earnings, and the fair value of its financial instruments. As of March 31, 2015, a hypothetical 10% strengthening or weakening of the U.S. dollar relative to all other currencies would result in a decrease or increase in Sotheby's cash balances of approximately $44.8 million.
Sotheby’s utilizes forward exchange contracts to hedge cash flow exposures related to foreign currency exchange rate movements, which primarily arise from short-term foreign currency denominated intercompany balances and, to a much lesser extent, foreign currency denominated client payable balances, as well as foreign currency denominated auction guarantee obligations. Such forward exchange contracts are typically short-term with settlement dates less than six months from their inception. Additionally, on rare occasions, Sotheby’s may purchase foreign currency option contracts to hedge risks associated with foreign currency denominated client payable balances. All derivative financial instruments are entered into by Sotheby’s global treasury function, which is responsible for monitoring and managing Sotheby's exposure to foreign currency exchange rate movements. As of March 31, 2015, the notional value of outstanding forward exchange contracts was $96.1 million. Notional values do not quantify risk or represent assets or liabilities of Sotheby’s, but are used to calculate cash settlements under outstanding forward exchange contracts. Sotheby’s is exposed to credit-related risks in the event of nonperformance by the three counterparties to its outstanding forward exchange contracts. Sotheby’s does not expect any of these counterparties to fail to meet their obligations, given their high short-term (A1/P1) credit ratings.
52#
ITEM 4: CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Disclosure Controls and Procedures
As of March 31, 2015, the Company has carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of the Company’s management, including the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures. Based upon that evaluation, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(e)) were effective as of March 31, 2015.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
There was no change in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Company’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.
PART II: OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 1: LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
For information related to legal proceedings, see Note 9 of Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
ITEM 1A: RISK FACTORS
Sotheby's operating results and liquidity are significantly influenced by a number of risk factors, many of which are not within its control. These factors, which are not ranked in any particular order, are discussed below.
The global economy and the financial markets and political conditions of various countries may negatively affect Sotheby's business and clients, as well as the supply of and demand for works of art.
The international art market is influenced over time by the overall strength and stability of the global economy and the financial markets of various countries, although this correlation may not be immediately evident. In addition, global political conditions and world events may affect Sotheby's business through their effect on the economies of various countries, as well as on the willingness of potential buyers and sellers to purchase and sell art in the wake of economic uncertainty. Sotheby's business can be particularly influenced by the economies, financial markets and political conditions of the U.S., the U.K., China, and the other major countries or territories of Europe and Asia (including the Middle East). Accordingly, weakness in those economies and financial markets can adversely affect the supply of and demand for works of art and Sotheby's business. Furthermore, global political conditions may also influence the enactment of legislation that could adversely impact Sotheby's business.
Government laws and regulations may restrict or limit Sotheby's business or impact the value of its real estate assets.
Many of Sotheby's activities are subject to laws and regulations including, but not limited to, import and export regulations, cultural property regulations, data protection and privacy laws, anti-money laundering laws, antitrust laws, copyright and resale royalty laws, laws and regulations involving sales, use, value-added and other indirect taxes, and regulations related to the use of real estate. In addition, Sotheby's is subject to local auction regulations, such as New York City Auction Regulations Subchapter M of Title 6 §§ 2-121-2-125, et. seq. Such regulations currently do not impose a material impediment to the worldwide business of Sotheby's, but do affect the art market generally. A material adverse change in such regulations, such as the American Royalties Too Act of 2014 introduced in the U.S. Congress, which would impose a 5% resale royalty (with a cap of $35,000) on sales of art through large auction houses, could affect Sotheby's business. Additionally, export and import laws and cultural property ownership laws could affect the availability of certain kinds of property for sale at Sotheby's principal auction locations, increase the cost of moving property to such locations, or expose Sotheby's to legal claims or government inquiries.
53#
Foreign currency exchange rate movements can significantly impact Sotheby's results of operations and financial condition.
Sotheby's has operations throughout the world. Approximately 59% of Sotheby's total revenues were earned outside of the U.S. in 2014, including 29% of its total revenues earned in the U.K. Additionally, Sotheby's has significant assets and liabilities denominated in the Pound Sterling, the Euro, and the Swiss Franc. Revenues, expenses, gains, and losses recorded in foreign currencies are translated using the monthly average exchange rates prevailing during the period in which they are recognized. Assets and liabilities recorded in foreign currencies are translated at the exchange rate on the balance sheet date. Accordingly, fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates, particularly for the Pound Sterling, the Euro, and the Swiss Franc can significantly impact Sotheby's results of operations and financial condition.
Competition in the international art market is intense and may adversely impact Sotheby's results of operations.
Sotheby's competes with other auctioneers and art dealers to obtain valuable consignments to offer for sale either at auction or through private sale. The level of competition is intense and can adversely impact Sotheby's ability to obtain valuable consignments for sale, as well as the commission margins achieved on such consignments.
Sotheby's cannot be assured of the amount and quality of property consigned for sale, which may cause significant variability in its financial results.
The amount and quality of property consigned for sale is influenced by a number of factors not within Sotheby's control. Many major consignments, and specifically single-owner sale consignments, often become available as a result of the death or financial or marital difficulties of the owner, all of which are unpredictable and may cause significant variability in Sotheby's financial results from period to period.
The demand for art is unpredictable, which may cause significant variability in Sotheby's results of operations.
The demand for art is influenced not only by overall economic conditions, but also by changing trends in the art market as to which collecting categories and artists are most sought after and by the collecting preferences of individual collectors, all of which are difficult to predict and which may adversely impact the ability of Sotheby's to obtain and sell consigned property, potentially causing significant variability in Sotheby's results from period to period.
The loss of key personnel could adversely impact Sotheby's ability to compete.
Sotheby's is largely a service business in which the ability of its employees to develop and maintain relationships with potential sellers and buyers of works of art is essential to its success. Moreover, Sotheby's business is unique, making it important to retain key specialists and members of management. Accordingly, Sotheby's business is highly dependent upon its success in attracting and retaining qualified personnel.
The business plans and initiatives being implemented by Sotheby's may not succeed.
Sotheby's future operating results are dependent, in part, on management's success in implementing its business plans and initiatives. The inability of Sotheby's to successfully implement its business plans and initiatives could result in, among other things, the loss of clients, the impairment of assets, and inefficiencies from operating in new and emerging markets. Also, Sotheby's short-term operating results and liquidity could be unfavorably impacted by the implementation of its business plans and initiatives.
Sotheby's joint venture and wholly-owned subsidiary in China are foreign-invested enterprises under Chinese law. As such, enforcement of certain of Sotheby's rights within these entities are subject to approval from the Chinese government, which could limit the ability of the entities to operate and succeed.
Sotheby's operates an equity joint venture with Beijing GeHua Art Company in China and, in 2014, established a wholly-owned subsidiary in China after obtaining the license required to operate as a Foreign-Invested Commercial Enterprise. Because these entities are foreign-invested enterprises under Chinese law, enforcement of certain of Sotheby's rights within these entities is subject to approval from the Chinese government. For example, all changes in shareholding and constitution of the joint venture will be subject to approval by the Chinese government, including in the event Sotheby's is seeking to terminate the joint venture agreement, exercise its put option, or wind-up the joint venture. Accordingly, Sotheby's ability to successfully operate its businesses in China could be constrained by the Chinese government and other unforeseen circumstances.
54#
Sotheby's capital allocation and financial policies may impact its liquidity, financial condition, market capitalization and business, and Sotheby's ongoing ability to return capital to its shareholders (and the size and timing of such return) is subject to ongoing business variables.
The actions taken by management based on its review of Sotheby's capital allocation and financial policies may impact its current and future liquidity, financial condition, market capitalization, and business. In addition, the amount and timing of any potential return of capital to shareholders depends on various factors, including the amount of excess cash generated by the business in the future, the ability to continue to debt finance the Finance segment loan portfolio, the business initiatives contemplated and implemented by management, and the amount of capital that may be required to support Sotheby’s future liquidity needs, among other factors. (See “Liquidity and Capital Resources" within Part I, Item 2, "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.")
A breach of the security measures protecting Sotheby's global network of information systems and those of certain third-party service providers utilized by Sotheby's may occur.
Sotheby's is dependent on a global network of information systems to conduct its business and is committed to maintaining a strong infrastructure to secure these systems. As part of its information systems infrastructure, Sotheby's relies, to a certain extent, upon third-party service providers to perform services related to its live auction bidding platform BIDnowTM, retail wine e-commerce, video broadcasting, website content distribution, and SAP hosting, as well as the live auction streaming and bidding via eBay's Live Auctions channel that commenced in April 2015. While these third-party service providers offer unique and specialized information security measures, certain elements of Sotheby's global information system security are outside management's direct control due to the use of these service providers. These third-party service providers are contractually obligated to host and maintain the service in a professional manner, in accordance with the rules and standards generally accepted within the industry. This includes conventional security measures such as firewall, password and encryption protection, breach notification requirements, and PCI practices for credit card processing services. A breach of the security measures protecting Sotheby's information systems could adversely impact its operations, reputation, and brand.
Sotheby's business continuity plans may not be effective in addressing the impact of unexpected events that could impact its business.
Sotheby's inability to successfully implement its business continuity plans in the wake of an unexpected event, such as an act of God or a terrorist attack occurring near one of its major selling and/or sourcing offices and/or any other unexpected event, could disrupt its ability to operate and adversely impact its operations.
Sotheby's relies on a small number of clients who make a significant contribution to its revenues, profitability, and operating cash flows.
Sotheby's relies on a small number of clients who make a significant contribution to its revenues, profitability, and operating cash flows. Accordingly, Sotheby's revenues, profitability, and operating cash flows are highly dependent upon its ability to develop and maintain relationships with this small group of clients, as well as the financial strength of these clients.
Subject to management approval under Sotheby's internal corporate governance policy, Sotheby's may pay a consignor the net sale proceeds from an auction or private sale before payment is collected from the buyer and/or may allow the buyer to take possession of purchased property before payment is received. In these situations, Sotheby's is exposed to losses in the event the buyer does not make payment.
Under the standard terms and conditions of its auction and private sales, Sotheby's is not obligated to pay the consignor for property that has not been paid for by the buyer. However, in certain instances and subject to management approval under Sotheby's internal corporate governance policy, the consignor may be paid the net sale proceeds before payment is collected from the buyer while Sotheby's retains possession of the property. In such situations, if the buyer does not make payment, Sotheby's will take title to the property, but could be exposed to losses if the value of the property declines. In certain other situations and subject to management approval under Sotheby's internal corporate governance policy, the buyer is allowed to take possession of purchased property before making payment. In these situations, Sotheby's is liable to the seller for the net sale proceeds whether or not the buyer makes payment and would incur losses in the event of buyer default. (See Note 5 of Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for information about auction and private sale receivables.)
55#
Sotheby's ability to collect auction receivables may be adversely impacted by buyers from emerging markets, as well as by the banking and foreign currency laws and regulations, and judicial systems of the countries in which it operates and in which its clients reside.
Sotheby's operates in 40 countries and has a worldwide client base that has grown in recent years due in part to a dramatic increase in the activity of buyers from emerging markets, and in particular, China. The collection of auction receivables related to buyers from emerging markets may be adversely impacted by the buyer's lack of familiarity with the auction process and the buyer's financial condition. Sotheby's ability to collect auction receivables may also be adversely impacted by the banking and foreign currency laws and regulations regarding the movement of funds out of certain countries, as well as by Sotheby's ability to enforce its rights as a creditor in jurisdictions where the applicable laws and regulations may be less defined, particularly in emerging markets.
Demand for art-related financing is unpredictable, which may cause variability in Sotheby's results of operations.
Sotheby's business is, in part, dependent on the demand for art-related financing, which can be significantly influenced by overall economic conditions and by the often unpredictable financial requirements of owners of major art collections. Accordingly, the results of Sotheby's Finance segment are subject to variability from period to period.
The ability of Sotheby's to realize proceeds from the sale of collateral for Finance segment loans may be delayed or limited.
In situations when there are competing claims on the collateral for Finance segment loans and/or when a borrower becomes subject to bankruptcy or insolvency laws, Sotheby's ability to realize proceeds from the sale of its collateral may be limited or delayed.
The value of the property held in inventory and the property pledged as collateral for Finance segment loans is subjective and often fluctuates, exposing Sotheby's to losses and significant variability in its results.
The market for fine art, decorative art, and jewelry is not a highly liquid trading market. As a result, the valuation of these items is inherently subjective and their realizable value often fluctuates over time. Accordingly, Sotheby's is at risk both as to the realizable value of the property held in inventory and as to the realizable value of the property pledged as collateral for Finance segment loans. In estimating the realizable value of the property held in inventory and the property pledged as collateral for Finance segment loans, management relies on the opinions of Sotheby's specialists, who consider the following complex array of factors when valuing these items: (i) whether the property is expected to be offered at auction or sold privately, and the timing of any such sale, (ii) the supply and demand for the property, taking into account economic conditions and, when relevant, changing trends in the art market as to which collecting categories and artists are most sought after; and (iii) recent sale prices achieved for comparable items within a particular collecting category and/or by a particular artist. If there is evidence that the estimated realizable value of a specific item held in inventory is less than its carrying value, a loss is recorded to reflect management's revised estimate of realizable value. In addition, if the estimated realizable value of the property pledged as collateral for a Finance segment loan is less than the corresponding loan balance, management assesses whether it is necessary to record a loss to reduce the carrying value of the loan, after taking into account the ability of the borrower to repay any shortfall between the value of the collateral and the amount of the loan. These factors may cause significant variability in Sotheby's results from period to period.
The low rate of historic losses on the Finance segment loan portfolio may not be indicative of future loan loss experience.
Sotheby's has historically incurred minimal losses on the Finance segment loan portfolio. However, despite management's stringent loan underwriting standards, Sotheby's previous loan loss experience may not be indicative of the future performance of the loan portfolio.
The collateral supporting the Finance segment loan portfolio is concentrated within certain collecting categories. A material decline in these markets could impair Sotheby’s ability to collect the principal and interest owed on certain loans and could require repayments of borrowings on such affected loans under Sotheby's revolving credit facility.
The collateral supporting the Finance segment loan portfolio is concentrated within certain collecting categories. Although management believes the Finance segment loan portfolio is sufficiently collateralized due to its current aggregate loan-to-value ratio of 48%, a material decline in these markets could impair Sotheby’s ability to collect the principal and interest owed on certain loans. Additionally, the eligibility of individual Finance segment loans included in the borrowing base of Sotheby's revolving credit facility requires a minimum loan-to-value ratio of 60%. A material decline in the value of Finance segment loan collateral could result in an increase in the loan-to-value ratio above 60% for individual loans and could require repayment of a portion of the borrowings associated with such loans.
56#
Sotheby's could be exposed to losses and/or reputational harm as a result of various claims and lawsuits incidental to the ordinary course of its business.
Sotheby's becomes involved in various legal proceedings, lawsuits, and other claims incidental to the ordinary course of its business. Management is required to assess the likelihood of any adverse judgments or outcomes in these matters, as well as potential ranges of probable or reasonably possible losses. A determination of the amount of losses, if any, to be recorded or disclosed as a result of these contingencies is based on a careful analysis of each individual exposure with, in some cases, the assistance of outside legal counsel. The amount of losses recorded or disclosed for such contingencies may change in the future due to new developments in each matter or a change in settlement strategy.
Sotheby's could be exposed to reputational harm as a result of wrongful actions by certain third parties.
Sotheby's is involved in various business arrangements and ventures with unaffiliated third parties. Wrongful actions by such parties could harm Sotheby's brand and reputation.
Sotheby's could be exposed to losses in the event of title or authenticity claims.
The assessment of property offered for auction or private sale can involve potential claims regarding title and authenticity. Items sold by Sotheby's may be subject to statutory warranties as to title and to a limited guarantee as to authenticity under the Conditions of Sale and Terms of Guarantee that are published in Sotheby's auction sale catalogues and the terms stated in, and the laws applicable to, agreements governing private sale transactions. The authentication of the items offered by Sotheby's is based on scholarship and research, but necessarily requires a degree of judgment from Sotheby's specialists. In the event of a title or authenticity claim against Sotheby's, Sotheby's may have recourse against the seller of the property and may have the benefit of insurance, but a claim could nevertheless expose Sotheby's to losses and to reputational risk.
Auction guarantees create the risk of loss resulting from the potential inaccurate valuation of art.
As discussed above, the market for fine art, decorative art, and jewelry is not a highly liquid trading market and, as a result, the valuation of these items is inherently subjective. Accordingly, Sotheby's is at risk with respect to management's ability to estimate the likely selling prices of property offered with auction guarantees. If management's judgments about the likely selling prices of property offered with auction guarantees prove to be inaccurate, there could be a significant adverse impact on Sotheby's results, financial condition, and liquidity. (See Note 10 of Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for information related to auction guarantees.)
Sotheby's could be exposed to losses in the event of nonperformance by its counterparties in auction guarantee risk and reward sharing arrangements.
In certain situations, Sotheby's reduces its financial exposure under auction guarantees through risk and reward sharing arrangements. Sotheby's counterparties to these risk and reward sharing arrangements are typically major international art dealers or major art collectors. Sotheby's could be exposed to losses in the event any of these counterparties do not perform according to the terms of these contractual arrangements. (See Note 10 of Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for information related to auction guarantees.)
Future costs and obligations related to Sotheby's U.K. Pension Plan are dependent on unpredictable factors, which may cause significant variability in employee benefit costs.
Future costs and obligations related to Sotheby's defined benefit pension plan in the U.K. are heavily influenced by changes in interest rates, investment performance in the debt and equity markets, changes in statutory requirements in the U.K., and actuarial assumptions, each of which is unpredictable and may cause significant variability in Sotheby's employee benefit costs. (See "Results of Operations" within Part I, Item 2, "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations," and Note 8 of Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for information related to the U.K. Pension Plan.)
57#
Tax matters may cause significant variability in Sotheby's financial results.
Sotheby's operates in many tax jurisdictions throughout the world and the provision for income taxes involves a significant amount of management judgment regarding interpretation of relevant facts and laws in the jurisdictions in which Sotheby's operates. Sotheby's effective income tax rate can vary significantly between periods due to a number of complex factors including, but not limited to: (i) future changes in applicable laws; (ii) projected levels of taxable income; (iii) changes in the jurisdictional mix of forecasted and/or actual pre-tax income; (iv) increases or decreases to valuation allowances recorded against deferred tax assets; (v) tax audits conducted by various tax authorities; (vi) adjustments to income taxes upon the finalization of income tax returns; (vii) the ability to claim foreign tax credits; (viii) the repatriation of foreign earnings for which Sotheby's has not previously provided income taxes; and (ix) tax planning strategies.
Sotheby's clients reside in various tax jurisdictions throughout the world. To the extent that there are changes to tax laws or tax reporting obligations in any of these jurisdictions, such changes could adversely impact the ability and/or willingness of clients to purchase or sell works of art through Sotheby's. Additionally, Sotheby's is subject to laws and regulations in many countries involving sales, use, value-added and other indirect taxes which are assessed by various governmental authorities and imposed on certain revenue-producing transactions between Sotheby's and its clients. The application of these laws and regulations to Sotheby's unique business and global client base, and the estimation of any related liabilities, is complex and requires a significant amount of judgment. These indirect tax liabilities are generally not those of Sotheby’s unless it fails to collect the correct amount of sales, use, value-added, or other indirect taxes. Failure to collect the correct amount of indirect tax on a transaction may expose Sotheby's to claims from tax authorities.
Insurance coverage for artwork may become more difficult to obtain, exposing Sotheby's to losses for artwork in Sotheby's possession.
Sotheby's maintains insurance coverage for the works of art it owns, works of art consigned by clients, and all other property that may be in Sotheby's custody, which are exhibited and stored at Sotheby's facilities around the world. An inability to adequately insure such works of art due to limited capacity of the global art insurance market could, in the future, have a material adverse impact on Sotheby's business.
Due to the nature of its business, valuable works of art are exhibited and stored at Sotheby's facilities around the world. Such works of art could be subject to damage or theft, which could have a material adverse effect on Sotheby's business and reputation.
Valuable works of art are exhibited and stored at Sotheby's facilities around the world. Although Sotheby's maintains state of the art security measures at its premises, valuable artworks may be subject to damage or theft. The damage or theft of valuable property despite Sotheby's security measures could have a material adverse impact on Sotheby's business and reputation. Sotheby's maintains insurance coverage for the works of art that are exhibited and stored at its facilities, which could significantly mitigate any potential losses resulting from the damage or theft of such works of art.
ITEM 2: UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS
As previously reported in Sotheby's Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 18, 2015, Sotheby's made the following employment inducement awards of unregistered equity securities to Thomas S. Smith, Jr., Sotheby's newly appointed President and Chief Executive Officer: (i) 158,638 shares of Restricted Stock that vest based on continued service; and (ii) 47,070 Restricted Stock Units, which will be settled in shares of Common Stock on a 1 for 1 basis, are fully vested and will be distributed to Mr. Smith in installments. The referenced Form 8-K contains a more detailed description of these awards. Sotheby's issued the Restricted Stock and the Restricted Stock Units on March 31, 2015 to Mr. Smith under the exemption from registration under Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act of 1933 for transactions by an issuer not involving any public offering. To receive these awards, Mr. Smith made a number of representations and warranties to Sotheby's including that (i) his investment was not as a result of a public announcement or solicitation; (ii) he is acquiring these securities for investment only at this time, and not to distribute them; and (ii) he is an accredited investor.
ITEM 4: MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES
Not applicable.
58#
ITEM 5: OTHER INFORMATION
On May 7, 2015, Sotheby's held its annual meeting of stockholders. The matters on which the stockholders voted were:
(1) Election of thirteen (13) directors to serve until the next annual meeting of stockholders and until their successors are duly elected and qualified;
(2) Ratification of the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as Sotheby's independent auditors for the year ending December 31, 2015;
(3) Approval of the Amended and Restated Sotheby's Stock Compensation Plan for Non-Employee Directors, to increase the number of shares of common stock reserved for issuance under the plan by 200,000 shares from 400,000 to 600,000 and amend other provisions; and
(4) | An advisory vote on 2014 named executive officer compensation. |
The results of the voting are shown below:
(1) ELECTION OF DIRECTORS (PROPOSAL 1) | |||||||||
Name of Nominee | FOR | AGAINST | ABSTAIN | ||||||
John M. Angelo | 57,806,747 | 565,602 | 77,860 | ||||||
Jessica M. Bibliowicz | 58,148,358 | 223,281 | 78,570 | ||||||
Kevin C. Conroy | 58,108,716 | 262,492 | 79,001 | ||||||
Domenico De Sole | 57,733,608 | 638,559 | 78,041 | ||||||
The Duke of Devonshire | 57,873,585 | 498,610 | 78,014 | ||||||
Daniel S. Loeb | 58,048,427 | 324,065 | 77,716 | ||||||
Olivier Reza | 58,070,042 | 302,588 | 77,578 | ||||||
Marsha E. Simms | 58,048,651 | 323,199 | 78,359 | ||||||
Thomas S. Smith, Jr. | 58,293,784 | 72,925 | 83,500 | ||||||
Robert S. Taubman | 52,197,562 | 6,173,193 | 79,453 | ||||||
Diana L. Taylor | 58,006,791 | 365,183 | 78,235 | ||||||
Dennis M. Weibling | 58,052,007 | 319,338 | 78,864 | ||||||
Harry J. Wilson | 58,107,485 | 121,085 | 221,639 | ||||||
59#
(2) RATIFICATION OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM (PROPOSAL 2) | ||||
62,326,915 | Votes were cast; | |||
61,861,638 | Votes were cast for the resolution; | |||
387,285 | Votes were cast against the resolution; and | |||
77,992 | Votes abstained | |||
(3) APPROVAL OF AMENDED AND RESTATED SOTHEBY'S STOCK COMPENSATION PLAN FOR NON-EMPLOYEE | ||||
DIRECTORS AND TO INCREASE THE NUMBER OF SHARES OF COMMON STOCK RSERVED FOR ISSUANCE | ||||
UNDER THE PLAN (PROPOSAL 3) | ||||
58,450,209 | Votes were cast; | |||
57,393,034 | Votes were cast for the resolution; | |||
725,923 | Votes were cast against the resolution; and | |||
331,252 | Votes abstained | |||
(4) ADVISORY VOTE TO APPROVE 2014 NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICER COMPENSATION (PROPOSAL 4) | ||||
58,450,209 | Votes were cast; | |||
55,542,277 | Votes were cast for the resolution; | |||
2,650,228 | Votes were cast against the resolution; and | |||
257,704 | Votes abstained | |||
60#
ITEM 6: EXHIBITS AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K
(a) Exhibits
10.1 | Fifteenth Amendment to the Agreement of Partnership dated March 23, 2015, between Sotheby's Nevada Inc. and Acquavella Contemporary Art. |
10.2 | Restricted Stock Unit Agreement between Sotheby's and Thomas S. Smith, dated March 31, 2015. |
10.3 | Restricted Stock Agreement between Sotheby's and Thomas S. Smith, dated March 31, 2015. |
10.4 | Performance Share Unit Agreement between Sotheby's and Thomas S. Smith, dated March 31, 2015. |
10.5 | Severance Agreement between Sotheby's and Alfredo Gangotena, dated December 4, 2013. |
31.1 | Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
31.2 | Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
32.1 | Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
32.2 | Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
101.INS | XBRL Instance Document. |
101.SCH | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document. |
101.CAL | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document. |
101.DEF | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document. |
101.LAB | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document. |
101.PRE XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document.
(b) Reports on Form 8-K
(i) | On January 6, 2015, Sotheby's filed a current report on Form 8-K under Item 5.02, "Departure of Directors or Certain Officers; Election of Directors; Appointment of Certain Officers; Compensatory Arrangements of Certain Officers" and Item 9.01, "Financial Statements and Exhibits." |
(ii) | On January 26, 2015, Sotheby's filed a current report on Form 8-K under Item 8.01, "Other Events." |
(iii) | On February 13, 2015, Sotheby's filed a current report on Form 8-K under Item 8.01, "Other Events" and Item 9.01, "Financial Statements and Exhibits." |
(iv) | On February 19, 2015, Sotheby's filed a current report on Form 8-K under Item 8.01, "Other Events" and Item 9.01, "Financial Statements and Exhibits." |
(v) | On March 2, 2015, Sotheby's filed a current report on Form 8-K under Item 2.01, "Results of Operations and Financial Condition" and Item 9.01, "Financial Statements and Exhibits." |
(vi) | On March 18, 2015, Sotheby's filed a current report on Form 8-K under Item 5.02, "Departure of Directors or Certain Officers; Election of Directors; Appointment of Certain Officers; Compensatory Arrangements of Certain Officers," Item 8.01, "Other Events." and Item 9.01, "Financial Statements and Exhibits." |
61#
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
SOTHEBY’S | ||
By: | /s/ KEVIN M. DELANEY | |
Kevin M. Delaney | ||
Senior Vice President, Controller and Chief Accounting Officer | ||
Date: May 11, 2015
62#
EXHIBIT INDEX
10.1 | Fifteenth Amendment to the Agreement of Partnership dated March 23, 2015, between Sotheby's Nevada Inc. and Acquavella Contemporary Art. |
10.2 | Restricted Stock Unit Agreement between Sotheby's and Thomas S. Smith, dated March 31, 2015. |
10.3 | Restricted Stock Agreement between Sotheby's and Thomas S. Smith, dated March 31, 2015. |
10.4 | Performance Share Unit Agreement between Sotheby's and Thomas S. Smith, dated March 31, 2015. |
10.5 | Severance Agreement between Sotheby's and Alfredo Gangotena, dated December 4, 2013. |
31.1 | Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
31.2 | Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
32.1 | Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
32.2 | Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
101.INS | XBRL Instance Document. |
101.SCH | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document. |
101.CAL | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document. |
101.DEF | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document. |
101.LAB | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document. |
101.PRE | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document. |
63#