OPTIMUMBANK HOLDINGS, INC.
|
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
Florida
|
000-50755
|
|
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
|
(IRS Employer Identification No.)
|
2477 East Commercial Boulevard, Fort Lauderdale, FL 33308
|
(Address of principal executive offices)
|
954-776-2332
|
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
|
N/A
|
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)
|
Page
|
||
2 | ||
|
|
|
3 | ||
|
||
4 | ||
|
|
|
5 | ||
|
|
|
6-7 | ||
|
|
|
8-28
|
||
29-37 | ||
|
|
|
38
|
||
38
|
||
39
|
||
40
|
1 |
September 30,
|
December 31,
|
|||||||
Assets
|
2012
|
2011
|
||||||
(Unaudited)
|
||||||||
|
||||||||
Cash and due from banks
|
$ | 1,959 | $ | 1,101 | ||||
Interest-bearing deposits with banks
|
3,688 | 5,123 | ||||||
Federal funds sold
|
21,720 | 16,552 | ||||||
Total cash and cash equivalents
|
27,367 | 22,776 | ||||||
Securities available for sale
|
21,588 | 28,907 | ||||||
Loans, net of allowance for loan losses of $1,936 and $2,349
|
85,451 | 89,217 | ||||||
Federal Home Loan Bank stock
|
1,478 | 2,159 | ||||||
Premises and equipment, net
|
2,859 | 2,691 | ||||||
Foreclosed real estate, net
|
10,444 | 7,646 | ||||||
Accrued interest receivable
|
477 | 499 | ||||||
Other assets
|
330 | 577 | ||||||
Total assets
|
$ | 149,994 | $ | 154,472 | ||||
Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity
|
||||||||
Liabilities:
|
||||||||
Noninterest-bearing demand deposits
|
1,309 | 515 | ||||||
Savings, NOW and money-market deposits
|
34,573 | 35,538 | ||||||
Time deposits
|
69,644 | 71,842 | ||||||
Total deposits
|
105,526 | 107,895 | ||||||
Federal Home Loan Bank advances
|
27,700 | 31,700 | ||||||
Junior subordinated debenture
|
5,155 | 5,155 | ||||||
Advanced payment by borrowers for taxes and insurance
|
1,029 | 567 | ||||||
Official checks
|
320 | 1,113 | ||||||
Other liabilities
|
1,397 | 1,256 | ||||||
Total liabilities
|
141,127 | 147,686 | ||||||
Stockholders’ equity:
|
||||||||
Preferred stock, no par value; 6,000,000 shares authorized, no shares issued or outstanding
|
0 | 0 | ||||||
Common stock, $.01 par value; 50,000,000 shares authorized, 30,900,833 and 22,411,108 shares issued and outstanding in 2012 and 2011
|
309 | 224 | ||||||
Additional paid-in capital
|
30,823 | 27,491 | ||||||
Accumulated deficit
|
(22,368 | ) | (19,991 | ) | ||||
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)
|
103 | (938 | ) | |||||
Total stockholders’ equity
|
8,867 | 6,786 | ||||||
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity
|
$ | 149,994 | $ | 154,472 |
2 |
Three Months Ended
September 30, |
Nine Months Ended
September 30, |
|||||||||||||||
2012
|
2011
|
2012
|
2011
|
|||||||||||||
Interest income:
|
||||||||||||||||
Loans
|
$ | 1,025 | $ | 1,121 | $ | 3,002 | $ | 3,607 | ||||||||
Securities
|
245 | 378 | 819 | 1,407 | ||||||||||||
Other
|
22 | 17 | 60 | 46 | ||||||||||||
Total interest income
|
1,292 | 1,516 | 3,881 | 5,060 | ||||||||||||
Interest expense:
|
||||||||||||||||
Deposits
|
272 | 441 | 848 | 1,489 | ||||||||||||
Borrowings
|
359 | 389 | 1,136 | 1,153 | ||||||||||||
Total interest expense
|
631 | 830 | 1,984 | 2,642 | ||||||||||||
Net interest income
|
661 | 686 | 1,897 | 2,418 | ||||||||||||
Provision (credit) for loan losses
|
197 | (243 | ) | 378 | 652 | |||||||||||
Net interest income after provision (credit) for loan losses
|
464 | 929 | 1,519 | 1,766 | ||||||||||||
Noninterest income:
|
||||||||||||||||
Service charges and fees
|
9 | 9 | 19 | 26 | ||||||||||||
Gain on sale of securities
|
0 | 0 | 0 | 153 | ||||||||||||
Other
|
1 | 1 | 179 | 53 | ||||||||||||
Total noninterest income
|
10 | 10 | 198 | 232 | ||||||||||||
Noninterest expenses:
|
||||||||||||||||
Salaries and employee benefits
|
465 | 444 | 1,301 | 1,380 | ||||||||||||
Occupancy and equipment
|
133 | 132 | 376 | 399 | ||||||||||||
Data processing
|
47 | 45 | 161 | 147 | ||||||||||||
Professional fees
|
283 | 417 | 810 | 1,267 | ||||||||||||
Insurance
|
68 | 99 | 208 | 326 | ||||||||||||
Foreclosed real estate
|
192 | 81 | 329 | 1,063 | ||||||||||||
Regulatory assessment
|
92 | 163 | 215 | 545 | ||||||||||||
Other
|
118 | 121 | 490 | 561 | ||||||||||||
Total noninterest expenses
|
1,398 | 1,502 | 3,890 | 5,688 | ||||||||||||
Other-than-temporary impairment on securities:
|
||||||||||||||||
Total other-than-temporary impairment losses
|
101 | 0 | 204 | 0 | ||||||||||||
Portion of losses recognized in other comprehensive income
|
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||||||
Net impairment loss
|
101 | 0 | 204 | 0 | ||||||||||||
Net loss
|
$ | (1,025 | ) | $ | (563 | ) | $ | (2,377 | ) | $ | (3,690 | ) | ||||
Net loss per share:
|
||||||||||||||||
Basic
|
$ | (.04 | ) | $ | (.69 | ) | $ | (.09 | ) | $ | (4.50 | ) | ||||
Diluted
|
$ | (.04 | ) | $ | (.69 | ) | $ | (.09 | ) | $ | (4.50 | ) | ||||
Dividends per share
|
$ | 0 | $ | 0 | $ | 0 | $ | 0 |
3 |
Three Months Ended September 30,
|
Nine Months Ended September 30,
|
|||||||||||||||
2012
|
2011
|
2012
|
2011
|
|||||||||||||
Net loss
|
$ | (1,025 | ) | $ | (563 | ) | $ | (2,377 | ) | $ | (3,690 | ) | ||||
Other comprehensive loss-
|
||||||||||||||||
Unrealized gains (loss) on securities available for sale- | ||||||||||||||||
Unrealized holding gains (losses) arising during period
|
603 | 21 | 1,041 | (854 | ) | |||||||||||
Comprehensive loss
|
$ | (422 | ) | $ | (542 | ) | $ | (1,336 | ) | $ | (4,544 | ) |
4 |
Accumulated
|
||||||||||||||||
Other
|
Total
|
|||||||||||||||
Additional
|
Compre-
|
Stockholders’
|
||||||||||||||
Common Stock
|
Paid-In
|
Accumulated
|
hensive
|
Equity
|
||||||||||||
Shares
|
Amount
|
Capital
|
Deficit
|
Loss
|
(Deficit)
|
|||||||||||
Balance at December 31, 2010
|
819,358
|
$
|
8
|
19,071
|
(16,244
|
)
|
0
|
2,835
|
||||||||
Net loss for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 (unaudited)
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
(3,690
|
)
|
0
|
(3,690
|
) | ||||||||
Net change in unrealized loss on securities available for sale (unaudited)
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
(854
|
)
|
(854
|
) | ||||||||
Balance at September 30, 2011 (unaudited)
|
819,358
|
$
|
8
|
19,071
|
(19,934
|
)
|
(854
|
)
|
(1,709
|
) | ||||||
Balance at December 31, 2011
|
22,411,108
|
$
|
224
|
27,491
|
(19,991
|
)
|
(938
|
)
|
6,786
|
|||||||
Proceeds from sale of common stock (unaudited)
|
8,447,500
|
85
|
3,290
|
0
|
0
|
3,375
|
||||||||||
Common stock issued as compensation to directors (unaudited)
|
42,225
|
0
|
42
|
0
|
0
|
42
|
||||||||||
Net loss for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 (unaudited)
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
(2,377
|
)
|
0
|
(2,377
|
) | ||||||||
Net change in unrealized loss on securities available for sale (unaudited)
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
1,041
|
1,041
|
||||||||||
Balance at September 30, 2012 (unaudited)
|
30,900,833
|
$
|
309
|
30,823
|
(22,368
|
)
|
103
|
8,867
|
5 |
Nine Months Ended September 30,
|
||||||||
2012
|
2011
|
|||||||
Cash flows from operating activities:
|
||||||||
Net loss
|
$ | (2,377 | ) | $ | (3,690 | ) | ||
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities:
|
||||||||
Depreciation and amortization
|
87 | 94 | ||||||
Provision for loan losses
|
378 | 652 | ||||||
Gain on sale of securities
|
0 | (153 | ) | |||||
Common stock issued as compensation to directors
|
42 | 0 | ||||||
Net amortization of fees, premiums and discounts
|
0 | 93 | ||||||
Decrease in other assets
|
247 | 373 | ||||||
Loss on sale of foreclosed real estate
|
28 | 186 | ||||||
Write-down of foreclosed real estate
|
70 | 704 | ||||||
Decrease in accrued interest receivable
|
22 | 101 | ||||||
Decrease in official checks and other liabilities
|
(652 | ) | (79 | ) | ||||
Other-than-temporary impairment of securities available for sale
|
204 | 0 | ||||||
Net cash used in operating activities
|
(1,951 | ) | (1,719 | ) | ||||
Cash flows from investing activities:
|
||||||||
Purchases of securities held to maturity
|
0 | (5,048 | ) | |||||
Principal repayments and maturity of securities available for sale
|
8,156 | 7,688 | ||||||
Proceeds from sale of security available for sale
|
0 | 11,028 | ||||||
Net decrease in loans
|
232 | 8,492 | ||||||
Purchase of premises and equipment
|
(255 | ) | (5 | ) | ||||
Proceeds from sale of foreclosed real estate
|
317 | 3,703 | ||||||
Capital improvements on foreclosed real estate
|
(57 | ) | 0 | |||||
Redemption of Federal Home Loan Bank stock
|
681 | 747 | ||||||
Net cash provided by investing activities
|
9,074 | 26,605 | ||||||
Cash flows from financing activities:
|
||||||||
Net decrease in deposits
|
(2,369 | ) | (19,014 | ) | ||||
Increase in advance payments by borrowers for taxes and insurance
|
462 | 459 | ||||||
Repayment of Federal Home Loan Bank advances
|
(4,000 | ) | 0 | |||||
Proceeds from sale of common stock
|
3,375 | 0 | ||||||
Net cash used in financing activities
|
(2,532 | ) | (18,555 | ) | ||||
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents
|
4,591 | 6,331 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of the period
|
22,776 | 14,367 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at end of the period
|
$ | 27,367 | $ | 20,698 |
6 |
Nine Months Ended September 30,
|
|||||||
2012
|
2011
|
||||||
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:
|
|||||||
Cash paid during the period for:
|
|||||||
Interest
|
$
|
1,898
|
$
|
2,535
|
|||
Income taxes
|
$
|
0
|
$
|
0
|
|||
Noncash investing and financing activities:
|
|||||||
Change in accumulated other comprehensive loss, net change in unrealized loss on security available for sale
|
$
|
1,041
|
$
|
21
|
|||
Transfer of securities held to maturity to available for sale
|
$
|
0
|
$
|
50,534
|
|||
Loans transferred to foreclosed real estate
|
$
|
3,156
|
$
|
8,596
|
7 |
(1)
|
General. OptimumBank Holdings, Inc. (the “Holding Company”) is a one-bank holding company and owns 100% of OptimumBank (the “Bank”), a state (Florida)-chartered commercial bank. The Bank’s wholly-owned subsidiaries are OB Real Estate Management, LLC, OB Real Estate Holdings, LLC and OB Real Estate Holdings 1503, LLC, all of which were formed in 2009, OB Real Estate Holdings 1695, LLC, OB Real Estate Holdings 1669, LLC, OB Real Estate Holdings 1645, LLC, OB Real Estate Holdings 1620, LLC, and OB Real Estate Holdings 1565, LLC, all formed in 2010, and OB Real Estate Holdings 1443, LLC, and OB Real Estate Holdings 1596, LLC, OB Real Estate Holdings 1636, LLC, and OB Real Estate Holdings Northwood, LLC, formed in 2011, OB Real Estate Holdings Sillato, LLC, OB Real Estate Holdings 1655, LLC, OB Real Estate Holdings 1704, LLC and OB Real Estate Holdings Rosemary, LLC, formed in 2012. The Holding Company’s only business is the operation of the Bank and its subsidiaries (collectively, the “Company”). The Bank’s deposits are insured up to applicable limits by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”). The Bank offers a variety of community banking services to individual and corporate customers through its three banking offices located in Broward County, Florida. OB Real Estate Management, LLC is primarily engaged in managing foreclosed real estate. This subsidiary had no activity in 2012 and 2011. All other subsidiaries are primarily engaged in holding and disposing of foreclosed real estate.
In the opinion of the management, the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements of the Company contain all adjustments (consisting principally of normal recurring accruals) necessary to present fairly the financial position at September 30, 2012, and the results of operations for the three- and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, and cash flows for the nine-months periods ended September 30, 2012 and 2011. The results of operations for the three- and nine-months ended September 30, 2012, are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full year.
Comprehensive Loss. Generally accepted accounting principles generally requires that recognized revenue, expenses, gains and losses be included in net loss. Although certain changes in assets and liabilities, such as unrealized gains and losses on available for sale securities, are reported as a separate component of the equity section of the consolidated balance sheet, such items along with net loss, are components of comprehensive loss. The only component of other comprehensive loss is the net change in the unrealized loss on the securities available for sale.
Income Taxes. During the year ended December 31, 2009, the Company assessed its earnings history and trend over the past year and its estimate of future earnings, and determined that it is more likely than not that the deferred tax asset will not be realized in the near term. Accordingly, a valuation allowance was recorded against the net deferred tax asset for the amount not expected to be realized in the future. Based on the available evidence at September 30, 2012, the Company determined that it is still more likely than not that the deferred tax asset will not be realized in the near term.
|
8 |
(1)
|
General, Continued.
|
|
Recent Pronouncements. In December 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2011-12 (“ASU 2011-12”), Comprehensive Income (Topic 220), Deferral of the Effective Date for Amendments to the Presentation of Reclassifications of Items Out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income in Accounting Standards Update No. 2011-05 (“ASU 2011-05”). Stakeholders raised concerns that the new presentation requirements about reclassifications of items out of accumulated other comprehensive income would be difficult for preparers and may add unnecessary complexity to financial statements. In addition, it is difficult for some stakeholders to change systems in time to gather the information for the new presentation requirements by the effective date of Update 2011-05. All other requirements in ASU 2011-05 are not affected by this update, including the requirement to report comprehensive income either in a single continuous financial statement or in two separate but consecutive financial statements. The amendments in ASU 2011-12 are effective on a retrospective basis for public entities for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2011, and interim periods within those years. An entity should provide the disclosures required by ASU 2011-12 retrospectively for all comparative periods presented. The adoption of this guidance did not have a material effect on the Company’s condensed consolidated financial statements.
In December 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-11 (“ASU 2011-11”), Balance Sheet (Topic 210), Disclosures about Offsetting Assets and Liabilities. The objective of ASU 2011-11 is to enhance disclosures required by U.S. GAAP by requiring improved information about financial instruments and derivative instruments that are either (1) offset in accordance with either Section 210-20-45 or Section 815-10-45 or (2) subject to an enforceable master netting arrangement or similar agreement, irrespective of whether they are offset in accordance with Section 210-20-45 or Section 815-10-45. This information will enable users of an entity’s financial statements to evaluate the effect or potential effect of netting arrangements on an entity’s financial position. The amendments in ASU 2011-11 are effective for annual reporting periods beginning on or after January 1, 2013, and interim periods within those annual periods. An entity should provide the disclosures required by ASU 2011-11 retrospectively for all comparative periods presented. The adoption of this guidance did not have a material effect on the Company’s condensed consolidated financial statements.
|
|
(continued)
|
9 |
(1)
|
General, Continued.
|
|
Recent Pronouncements, Continued. In June 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-05 (“ASU 2011-05”), Comprehensive Income (Topic 220), Presentation of Comprehensive Income. The objective of ASU 2011-05 is to improve the comparability, consistency, and transparency of financial reporting and to increase the prominence of items reported in other comprehensive income. To achieve this goal and to facilitate convergence of U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) and International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS), the FASB decided to eliminate the option to present components of other comprehensive income as part of the consolidated statement of changes in stockholders’ equity. The amendments in ASU 2011-05 require that all nonowner changes in stockholders’ equity be presented either in a single continuous statement of comprehensive income or in two separate but consecutive statements. In the two-statement approach, the first statement should present total net income and its components followed consecutively by a second statement that should present total other comprehensive income, the components of other comprehensive income, and the total of comprehensive income. The amendments in ASU 2011-05 should be applied retrospectively. For public entities, the amendments are effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2011. Early adoption is permitted, because compliance with the amendments is already permitted. The amendments do not require any transition disclosures. The adoption of this guidance did not have a material effect on the Company’s condensed consolidated financial statements.
In May 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-04 (“ASU 2011-04”), Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820): Amendments to Achieve Common Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure Requirements in U.S. GAAP and IFRSs. The objective of ASU 2011-04 is to provide clarification of Topic 820 and, also, to ensure that fair value has the same meaning in U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) and in international financial reporting standards (“IFRSs”) and that their respective fair value measurement and disclosure requirements are generally the same. Thus, this update results in common principles and requirements for measuring fair value and for disclosing information about fair value measurements in accordance with GAAP and IFRSs. The amendment is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2011 and is to be applied prospectively. Early application is not permitted. The adoption of this guidance did not have a material effect on the Company’s condensed consolidated financial statements.
|
|
(continued)
|
10 |
(2)
|
Securities. Securities have been classified according to management’s intent. The carrying amount of securities and approximate fair values are as follows (in thousands):
|
Gross
|
Gross
|
||||||||||||||||
Amortized
|
Unrealized
|
Unrealized
|
Fair
|
||||||||||||||
Cost
|
Gains
|
Losses
|
Value
|
||||||||||||||
At September 30, 2012:
|
|||||||||||||||||
Securities Available for Sale-
|
|||||||||||||||||
Mortgage-backed securities
|
$ | 21,485 | $ | 375 | $ | (272 | ) | $ | 21,588 | ||||||||
At December 31, 2011:
|
|||||||||||||||||
Securities Available for Sale-
|
|||||||||||||||||
Mortgage-backed securities
|
$ | 29,845 | $ | 202 | $ | (1,140 | ) | $ | 28,907 |
|
Securities with gross unrealized losses at September 30, 2012, aggregated by investment category and length of time that individual securities have been in a continuous loss position, is as follows (in thousands):
|
Over Twelve Months
|
|||||||||
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
|
Fair
Value
|
||||||||
Securities Available for Sale-
|
|||||||||
Mortgage-backed securities
|
$ | 272 | $ | 5,132 |
11 |
(2)
|
Securities, Continued. Management evaluates securities for other-than-temporary impairment at least on a quarterly basis, and more frequently when economic or market concerns warrant such evaluation. A security is impaired if the fair value is less than its carrying value at the financial statement date. When a security is impaired, the Company determines whether this impairment is temporary or other-than-temporary. In estimating other-than-temporary impairment (“OTTI”) losses, management assesses whether it intends to sell, or it is more likely than not that it will be required to sell, a security in an unrealized loss position before recovery of its amortized cost basis. If either of these criteria is met, the entire difference between amortized cost and fair value is recognized in operations. For securities that do not meet the aforementioned criteria, the amount of impairment recognized in operations is limited to the amount related to credit losses, while impairment related to other factors is recognized in other comprehensive loss. Management utilizes cash flow models to segregate impairments to distinguish between impairment related to credit losses and impairment related to other factors. To assess for OTTI, management considers, among other things, (i) the severity and duration of the impairment; (ii) the ratings of the security; (iii) the overall transaction structure (the Company’s position within the structure, the aggregate, near-term financial performance of the underlying collateral, delinquencies, defaults, loss severities, recoveries, prepayments, cumulative loss projections, and discounted cash flows); and (iv) the timing and magnitude of a break in modeled cash flows.
In evaluating mortgage-backed securities with unrealized losses greater than twelve months, management utilizes various resources, including input from independent third party firms to perform an analysis of expected future cash flows. The process begins with an assessment of the underlying collateral backing the mortgage pools. Management develops specific assumptions using as much market data as possible and includes internal estimates as well as estimates published by rating agencies and other third-party sources. The data for the individual borrowers in the underlying mortgage pools are generally segregated by state, FICO score at issue, loan to value at issue and income documentation criteria. Mortgage pools are evaluated for current and expected levels of delinquencies and foreclosures, based on where they fall in the proscribed data set of FICO score, geographics, LTV and documentation type and a level of loss severity is assigned to each security based on its experience. The above-described historical data is used to develop current and expected measures of cumulative default rates as well as ultimate loss frequency and severity within the underlying mortgages. This reveals the expected future cash flows within the mortgage pool. The data described above is then input to an industry recognized model to assess the behavior of the particular security tranche owned by the Company. Significant inputs in this process include the structure of any subordination structures, if applicable, and are dictated by the structure of each particular security as laid out in the offering documents. The forecasted cash flows from the mortgage pools are input through the security structuring model to derive expected cash flows for the specific security owned by the Company to determine if the future cash flows are expected to exceed the book value of the security. The values for the significant inputs are updated on a regular basis. During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012, the Company recorded other-than-temporary impairment charges totaling $101,000 and $204,000, respectively.
|
12 |
(2)
|
Securities, Continued. The unrealized losses on four investment securities were caused by market conditions. It is expected that the securities would not be settled at a price less than the book value of the investments. Because the decline in fair value is attributable to market conditions and not credit quality, and because the Company has the ability and intent to hold these investments until a market price recovery or maturity, these investments are not considered other-than-temporarily impaired.
|
(3)
|
Loans. The segments of loans are as follows (in thousands):
|
At September 30,
|
At December 31,
|
||||||||
2012
|
2011
|
||||||||
Residential real estate
|
$ | 32,430 | $ | 30,434 | |||||
Multi-family real estate
|
4,182 | 4,109 | |||||||
Commercial real estate
|
39,221 | 41,307 | |||||||
Land and construction
|
7,323 | 11,783 | |||||||
Commercial
|
3,959 | 3,713 | |||||||
Consumer
|
123 | 175 | |||||||
Total loans
|
87,238 | 91,521 | |||||||
Add (deduct):
|
|||||||||
Net deferred loan fees, costs and premiums
|
149 | 45 | |||||||
Allowance for loan losses
|
(1,936 | ) | (2,349 | ) | |||||
Loans, net
|
$ | 85,451 | $ | 89,217 |
Residential
|
Multi-Family
|
Commercial
|
Land
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Real
|
Real
|
Real
|
and
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Estate
|
Estate
|
Estate
|
Construction
|
Commercial
|
Consumer
|
Total
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Three Months Ended September 30, 2012:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Beginning balance
|
$ | 703 | $ | 245 | $ | 799 | $ | 215 | $ | 115 | $ | 25 | $ | 2,102 | |||||||||||||||
Provision (credit) for loan losses
|
(231 | ) | 15 | 364 | 36 | 12 | 0 | 196 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Charge-offs
|
0 | (1 | ) | (346 | ) | (53 | ) | 0 | 0 | (400 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
Recoveries
|
17 | 0 | 0 | 17 | 0 | 4 | 38 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Ending balance
|
$ | 489 | $ | 259 | $ | 817 | $ | 215 | $ | 127 | $ | 29 | $ | 1,936 | |||||||||||||||
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2012:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Beginning balance
|
$ | 549 | $ | 247 | $ | 1,190 | $ | 187 | $ | 161 | $ | 15 | $ | 2,349 | |||||||||||||||
Provision (credit) for loan losses
|
70 | 12 | 154 | 170 | (33 | ) | 5 | 378 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Charge-offs
|
(146 | ) | 0 | (557 | ) | (388 | ) | (1 | ) | 0 | (1,092 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Recoveries
|
16 | 0 | 30 | 246 | 0 | 9 | 301 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Ending balance
|
$ | 489 | $ | 259 | $ | 817 | $ | 215 | $ | 127 | $ | 29 | $ | 1,936 | |||||||||||||||
13 |
(3)
|
Loans, Continued.
|
Residential
Real
Estate
|
Multi-Family
Real
Estate
|
Commercial
Real
Estate
|
Land
and
Construction
|
Consumer
|
Total
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Three Months Ended September 30, 2011:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Beginning balance
|
$ | 1,093 | $ | 308 | $ | 1,400 | $ | 197 | $ | 77 | $ | 3,075 | |||||||||||||
Provision for loan losses
|
(644 | ) | 135 | 374 | (117 | ) | 9 | (243 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Charge-offs
|
0 | 0 | (150 | ) | 0 | 0 | (150 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Recoveries
|
328 | 2 | 0 | 121 | 4 | 455 | |||||||||||||||||||
Ending balance
|
$ | 777 | $ | 445 | $ | 1,624 | $ | 201 | $ | 90 | $ | 3,137 | |||||||||||||
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2011:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Beginning balance
|
$ | 1,285 | $ | 282 | $ | 1,542 | $ | 514 | $ | 80 | $ | 3,703 | |||||||||||||
Provision (credit) for loan losses
|
(562 | ) | 158 | 284 | 772 | 0 | 652 | ||||||||||||||||||
Charge-offs
|
(308 | ) | 0 | (202 | ) | (1,230 | ) | 0 | (1,740 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Recoveries
|
362 | 5 | 0 | 145 | 10 | 522 | |||||||||||||||||||
Ending balance
|
$ | 777 | $ | 445 | $ | 1,624 | $ | 201 | $ | 90 | $ | 3,137 |
At September 30, 2012 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Residential
Real
Estate
|
Multi-Family
Real
Estate
|
Commercial
Real
Estate
|
Land
and
Construction
|
Commercial
|
Consumer
|
Total
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Individually evaluated for
impairment: |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Recorded investment
|
$ | 7,628 | $ | 0 | $ | 13,933 | $ | 905 | $ | 0 | $ | 0 | $ | 22,466 | |||||||||||||||
Balance in allowance
for loan losses |
$ | 0 | $ | 0 | $ | 0 | $ | 0 | $ | 0 | $ | 0 | $ | 0 | |||||||||||||||
Collectively evaluated for
impairment: |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Recorded investment
|
$ | 24,802 | $ | 4,182 | $ | 25,288 | $ | 6,418 | $ | 3,959 | $ | 123 | $ | 64,772 | |||||||||||||||
Balance in allowance
for loan losses |
$ | 489 | $ | 259 | $ | 817 | $ | 215 | $ | 127 | $ | 29 | $ | 1,936 |
At December 31, 2011
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Residential
Real Estate
|
Multi-Family
Real Estate
|
Commercial
Real Estate
|
Land and Construction |
Consumer
|
Total
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Individually evaluated for
impairment: |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Recorded investment
|
$ | 7,919 | $ | 0 | $ | 16,716 | $ | 7,241 | $ | 68 | $ | 31,944 | |||||||||||||
Balance in allowance
for loan losses |
$ | 0 | $ | 0 | $ | 11 | $ | 0 | $ | 0 | $ | 11 | |||||||||||||
Collectively evaluated for
impairment: |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Recorded investment
|
$ | 23,223 | $ | 4,109 | $ | 27,596 | $ | 4,542 | $ | 107 | $ | 59,577 | |||||||||||||
Balance in allowance
for loan losses |
$ | 566 | $ | 247 | $ | 1,323 | $ | 187 | $ | 15 | $ | 2,338 |
14 |
(3)
|
Loans, Continued. The Company has divided the loan portfolio into six portfolio segments, each with different risk characteristics and methodologies for assessing risk. The portfolio segments identified by the Company are as follows:
Real Estate Mortgage Loans. Real estate mortgage loans are typically segmented into four categories: Residential real estate, Multi-family real estate, Commercial real estate, and Land and Construction. Residential real estate loans are underwritten in accordance with policies set forth and approved by the Board of Directors (the “Board”), including repayment capacity and source, value of the underlying property, credit history and stability. Multi-family real estate and commercial real estate loans are secured by the subject property and are underwritten based upon standards set forth in the policies approved by the Company’s Board. Such standards include, among other factors, loan to value limits, cash flow coverage and general creditworthiness of the obligors. Land and construction loans to borrowers are to finance the construction of owner occupied and leased properties. These loans are categorized as construction loans during the construction period, later converting to commercial or residential real estate loans after the construction is complete and amortization of the loan begins. Real estate development and construction loans are approved based on an analysis of the borrower and guarantor, the viability of the project and on an acceptable percentage of the appraised value of the property securing the loan. Real estate development and construction loan funds are disbursed periodically based on the percentage of construction completed. The Company carefully monitors these loans with on-site inspections and requires the receipt of lien waivers on funds advanced. Development and construction loans are typically secured by the properties under development or construction, and personal guarantees are typically obtained. Further, to assure that reliance is not placed solely on the value of the underlying property, the Company considers the market conditions and feasibility of proposed projects, the financial condition and reputation of the borrower and guarantors, the amount of the borrower’s equity in the project, independent appraisals, costs estimates and pre-construction sale information. The Company also makes loans on occasion for the purchase of land for future development by the borrower. Land loans are extended for the future development for either commercial or residential use by the borrower. The Company carefully analyzes the intended use of the property and the viability thereof.
|
|
(continued)
|
15 |
(3)
|
Loans, Continued.
Commercial Loans. Commercial loans are primarily underwritten on the basis of the borrowers’ ability to service such debt from income. The cash flows of borrowers, however, may not be as expected and the collateral securing these loans may fluctuate in value. As a general practice, the Company takes as collateral a security interest in any available real estate, equipment, or other chattel, although loans may also be made on an unsecured basis. Collateralized working capital loans typically are secured by short-term assets whereas long-term loans are primarily secured by long-term assets. These loans are also affected by adverse economic conditions should they prevail within the Company’s local market.
Consumer Loans. Consumer loans are extended for various purposes, including purchases of automobiles, recreational vehicles, and boats. Also offered are home improvement loans, lines of credit, personal loans, and deposit account collateralized loans. Repayment of these loans is primarily dependent on the personal income of the borrowers, which can be impacted by economic conditions in their market areas such as unemployment levels. Loans to consumers are extended after a credit evaluation, including the creditworthiness of the borrower(s), the purpose of the credit, and the secondary source of repayment. Consumer loans are made at fixed and variable interest rates and may be made on terms of up to ten years. Risk is mitigated by the fact that the loans are of smaller individual amounts and spread over a large number of borrowers.
|
|
(continued)
|
16 |
(3)
|
Loans, Continued. The following summarizes the loan credit quality (in thousands):
|
OLEM
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Other Loans
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Especially
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Pass
|
Mentioned)
|
Substandard
|
Doubtful
|
Loss
|
Total
|
|||||||||||||||||||
At September 30, 2012:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Residential real estate:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Closed-end first mortgages
|
$ | 21,678 | $ | 2,919 | $ | 4,709 | $ | 0 | $ | 0 | $ | 29,306 | ||||||||||||
Closed-end second mortgages
|
3,124 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3,124 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total residential real estate
|
24,802 | 2,919 | 4,709 | 0 | 0 | 32,430 | ||||||||||||||||||
Multi-family real estate
|
4,182 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4,182 | ||||||||||||||||||
Commercial real estate:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Owner-occupied
|
9,949 | 1,979 | 78 | 0 | 0 | 12,006 | ||||||||||||||||||
Non-owner-occupied
|
12,235 | 1,125 | 13,855 | 0 | 0 | 27,215 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total commercial real estate
|
22,184 | 3,104 | 13,933 | 0 | 0 | 39,221 | ||||||||||||||||||
Land and construction
|
6,369 | 49 | 905 | 0 | 0 | 7,323 | ||||||||||||||||||
Commercial
|
3,959 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3,959 | ||||||||||||||||||
Consumer
|
123 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 123 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total
|
$ | 61,619 | $ | 6,072 | $ | 19,547 | $ | 0 | $ | 0 | $ | 87,238 | ||||||||||||
At December 31, 2011:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Residential real estate:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Closed-end first mortgages
|
$ | 18,588 | $ | 3,686 | $ | 5,001 | $ | 0 | $ | 0 | $ | 27,275 | ||||||||||||
Closed-end second mortgages
|
3,159 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3,159 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total residential real estate
|
21,747 | 3,686 | 5,001 | 0 | 0 | 30,434 | ||||||||||||||||||
Multi-family real estate
|
4,109 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4,109 | ||||||||||||||||||
Commercial real estate:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Owner-occupied
|
10,132 | 2,012 | 369 | 0 | 0 | 12,513 | ||||||||||||||||||
Non-owner-occupied
|
10,822 | 2,764 | 15,208 | 0 | 0 | 28,794 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total commercial real estate
|
20,954 | 4,776 | 15,577 | 0 | 0 | 41,307 | ||||||||||||||||||
Land and construction
|
4,493 | 49 | 7,241 | 0 | 0 | 11,783 | ||||||||||||||||||
Commercial
|
3,713 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3,713 | ||||||||||||||||||
Consumer
|
107 | 68 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 175 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total
|
$ | 55,123 | $ | 8,579 | $ | 27,819 | $ | 0 | $ | 0 | $ | 91,521 |
17 |
(3)
|
Loans, Continued. Internally assigned loan grades are defined as follows:
|
18 |
(3)
|
Loans, Continued. Age analysis of past-due loans is as follows (in thousands):
|
Accruing Loans
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Greater
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
30-59 | 60-89 |
Than 90
|
Total
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Days
|
Days
|
Days
|
Past
|
Nonaccrual
|
Total
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Past Due
|
Past Due
|
Past Due
|
Due
|
Current
|
Loans
|
Loans
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
At September 30, 2012:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Residential real estate:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Closed-end first mortgages
|
$ | 0 | $ | 0 | $ | 0 | $ | 0 | $ | 24,597 | $ | 4,709 | $ | 29,306 | ||||||||||||||
Closed-end second mortgages
|
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3,124 | 0 | 3,124 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Subtotal
|
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 27,721 | 4,709 | 32,430 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Multi-family real estate
|
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4,182 | 0 | 4,182 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Commercial real estate:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Owner-occupied
|
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 11,928 | 78 | 12,006 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Non-owner-occupied
|
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 13,360 | 13,855 | 27,215 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Subtotal
|
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 25,288 | 13,933 | 39,221 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Land and construction
|
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6,418 | 905 | 7,323 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Commercial
|
701 | 0 | 0 | 701 | 3,258 | 0 | 3,959 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Consumer
|
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 123 | 0 | 123 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Total
|
$ | 701 | $ | 0 | $ | 0 | $ | 701 | $ | 66,990 | $ | 19,547 | $ | 87,238 | ||||||||||||||
At December 31, 2011:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Residential real estate:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Closed-end first mortgages
|
$ | 0 | $ | 768 | $ | 0 | $ | 768 | $ | 21,506 | $ | 5,001 | $ | 27,275 | ||||||||||||||
Closed-end second mortgages
|
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3,159 | 0 | 3,159 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Subtotal
|
0 | 768 | 0 | 768 | 24,665 | 5,001 | 30,434 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Multi-family real estate
|
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4,109 | 0 | 4,109 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Commercial real estate:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Owner-occupied
|
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 12,144 | 369 | 12,513 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Non-owner-occupied
|
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 13,586 | 15,208 | 28,794 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Subtotal
|
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 25,730 | 15,577 | 41,307 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Land and construction
|
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4,542 | 7,241 | 11,783 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Commercial
|
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3,713 | 0 | 3,713 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Consumer
|
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 175 | 0 | 175 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Total
|
$ | 0 | $ | 768 | $ | 0 | $ | 768 | $ | 62,934 | $ | 27,819 | $ | 91,521 |
19 |
|
(3)
|
Loans, Continued. The following summarizes the amount of impaired loans (in thousands):
|
At September 30, 2012
|
At December 31, 2011
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Unpaid
|
Unpaid
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Recorded
|
Principal
|
Related
|
Recorded
|
Principal
|
Related
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Investment
|
Balance
|
Allowance
|
Investment
|
Balance
|
Allowance
|
|||||||||||||||||||
With no related allowance recorded:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Residential real estate-
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Closed-end first mortgages
|
$ | 7,628 | $ | 8,079 | $ | 0 | $ | 7,919 | $ | 8,465 | $ | 0 | ||||||||||||
Commercial real estate:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Owner-occupied
|
78 | 78 | 0 | 369 | 376 | 0 | ||||||||||||||||||
Non-owner-occupied
|
13,855 | 16,730 | 0 | 15,208 | 17,584 | 0 | ||||||||||||||||||
Land and construction
|
905 | 2,429 | 0 | 7,241 | 11,652 | 0 | ||||||||||||||||||
Consumer
|
0 | 0 | 0 | 68 | 68 | 0 | ||||||||||||||||||
With an allowance recorded:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Commercial real estate-
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Non-owner-occupied
|
0 | 0 | 0 | 1,139 | 1,139 | 11 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Residential real estate-
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Closed-end first mortgages
|
$ | 7,628 | $ | 8,079 | $ | 0 | $ | 7,919 | $ | 8,465 | $ | 0 | ||||||||||||
Commercial real estate:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Owner-occupied
|
$ | 78 | $ | 78 | $ | 0 | $ | 369 | $ | 376 | $ | 0 | ||||||||||||
Non-owner-occupied
|
$ | 13,855 | $ | 16,730 | $ | 0 | $ | 16,347 | $ | 18,723 | $ | 11 | ||||||||||||
Land and construction
|
$ | 905 | $ | 2,429 | $ | 0 | $ | 7,241 | $ | 11,652 | $ | 0 | ||||||||||||
Consumer
|
$ | 0 | $ | 0 | $ | 0 | $ | 68 | $ | 68 | $ | 0 | ||||||||||||
Total
|
$ | 22,466 | $ | 27,316 | $ | 0 | $ | 31,944 | $ | 39,284 | $ | 11 |
|
The average net investment in impaired loans and interest income recognized and received on impaired loans are as follows (in thousands):
|
Three Months Ended September 30,
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
2012
|
2011
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Average
|
Interest
|
Interest
|
Average
|
Interest
|
Interest
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Recorded
|
Income
|
Income
|
Recorded
|
Income
|
Income
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Investment
|
Recognized
|
Received
|
Investment
|
Recognized
|
Received
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Residential real estate-
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Closed-end first mortgages
|
$ | 7,688 | $ | 52 | $ | 102 | $ | 11,080 | $ | 66 | $ | 71 | ||||||||||||
Multi-family real estate
|
$ | 0 | $ | 0 | $ | 0 | $ | 0 | $ | 0 | $ | 0 | ||||||||||||
Commercial real estate:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Owner-occupied
|
$ | 78 | $ | 0 | $ | 0 | $ | 296 | $ | 0 | $ | 0 | ||||||||||||
Non-owner-occupied
|
$ | 14,199 | $ | 0 | $ | 63 | $ | 18,404 | $ | 10 | $ | 92 | ||||||||||||
Land and construction
|
$ | 2,372 | $ | 0 | $ | 25 | $ | 6,746 | $ | 0 | $ | 28 | ||||||||||||
Consumer-
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Non-real estate secured
|
$ | 0 | $ | 0 | $ | 0 | $ | 216 | $ | 1 | $ | 1 | ||||||||||||
Total
|
$ | 24,337 | $ | 52 | $ | 190 | $ | 36,742 | $ | 77 | $ | 192 |
20 |
|
(3)
|
Loans, Continued.
|
Nine Months Ended September 30,
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
2012
|
2011
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Average
|
Interest
|
Interest
|
Average
|
Interest
|
Interest
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Recorded
|
Income
|
Income
|
Recorded
|
Income
|
Income
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Investment
|
Recognized
|
Received
|
Investment
|
Recognized
|
Received
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Residential real estate-
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Closed-end first mortgages
|
$ | 7,863 | $ | 156 | $ | 254 | $ | 11,686 | $ | 174 | $ | 211 | ||||||||||||
Multi-family real estate
|
$ | 0 | $ | 0 | $ | 0 | $ | 0 | $ | 0 | $ | 0 | ||||||||||||
Commercial real estate:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Owner-occupied
|
$ | 177 | $ | 0 | $ | 0 | $ | 466 | $ | 0 | $ | 1 | ||||||||||||
Non-owner-occupied
|
$ | 14,682 | $ | 0 | $ | 172 | $ | 19,009 | $ | 95 | $ | 303 | ||||||||||||
Land and construction
|
$ | 4,681 | $ | 0 | $ | 69 | $ | 7,704 | $ | 21 | $ | 119 | ||||||||||||
Consumer-
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Non-real estate secured
|
$ | 0 | $ | 0 | $ | 0 | $ | 224 | $ | 5 | $ | 5 | ||||||||||||
Total
|
$ | 27,403 | $ | 156 | $ | 495 | $ | 39,089 | $ | 295 | $ | 639 |
|
No loans have been determined to be restructured as troubled debt restructurings (“TDRs”) during the nine months ended September 30, 2012. The following schedule summarizes TDRs during nine months ended September 30, 2011. There were no loans determined to be restructured as TDR during three months ended September 30, 2011.
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2011
|
||||||||||||
Outstanding Recorded Investment
|
||||||||||||
Number
|
||||||||||||
of
|
Pre-
|
Post-
|
||||||||||
Contracts
|
Modification
|
Modification
|
||||||||||
Troubled Debt Restructurings:
|
||||||||||||
Real estate mortgage loans:
|
||||||||||||
Residential real estate:
|
||||||||||||
Modified interest rate and amortization
|
1 | $ | 1,289 | $ | 1,289 | |||||||
Commercial real estate:
|
||||||||||||
Modified interest rate and amortization
|
4 | 6,321 | 6,321 | |||||||||
Land and construction:
|
||||||||||||
Modified interest rate and amortization
|
1 | 2,080 | 2,080 | |||||||||
Total
|
6 | $ | 9,690 | $ | 9,690 |
21 |
(3)
|
Loans, Continued. There were no defaults of TDR’s during the nine months ended September 30, 2012. The following schedule summarizes troubled debt restructurings that subsequently defaulted during three and nine months ended September 30, 2011.
|
Three Months Ended
September 30, 2011
|
Nine Months Ended
September 30, 2011
|
|||||||||||||||
Number
of
Contracts
|
Recorded
Investment
|
Number
of
Contracts
|
Recorded
Investment
|
|||||||||||||
Troubled debt restructurings that subsequently defaulted which were restructured during the last twelve months (dollars in thousands):
|
||||||||||||||||
Real estate mortgage loans-Land and construction
|
1 | $ | 2,806 | 1 | $ | 2,806 |
(4)
|
Regulatory Capital. The Bank is required to maintain certain minimum regulatory capital requirements. The following is a summary at September 30, 2012 of the regulatory capital requirements and the Bank’s capital on a percentage basis:
|
Bank
|
Regulatory
Requirement |
|||||||
Tier I capital to total average assets
|
9.21 | % | 8.00 | % | ||||
Tier I capital to risk-weighted assets
|
12.64 | % | 4.00 | % | ||||
Total capital to risk-weighted assets
|
13.90 | % | 12.00 | % |
|
As a result of the Consent Order discussed in Note 8, the Bank is categorized as “adequately capitalized” until the Consent Order is lifted, even though the ratios would otherwise place it in the “well capitalized” category.
|
(5)
|
Loss Per Share. Basic loss per share has been computed on the basis of the weighted-average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the period. Basic and diluted loss per share is the same due to the net loss incurred by the Company. Loss per common share has been computed based on the following:
|
Three Months Ended September 30,
|
Nine Months Ended September 30,
|
|||||||||||||||
2012 | 2011 |
2012
|
2011
|
|||||||||||||
Weighted-average number of common shares outstanding used to calculate basic and diluted loss per common share
|
29,114,906 | 819,358 | 26,130,843 | 819,358 |
22 |
(6)
|
Stock-Based Compensation. On December 27, 2011, the Company’s stockholders approved the 2011 Equity Incentive Plan (“2011 Plan”). A total of 2,200,000 shares of common stock are available to be issued under the 2011 Plan. Options, restricted stock, performance share awards and bonus share awards in lieu of obligations may be issued under the 2011 Plan. Both incentive stock options and nonqualified stock options can be granted under the 2011 Plan. The exercise price of the stock options cannot be less than the fair market value of the common stock on the date of grant. Effective January 1, 2012, the Company adopted a Non- Employee Director Compensation Plan under which bonus shares issuable under the 2011 Plan may be issued as compensation to outside directors. During the nine months ended September 30, 2012, 42,225 shares of stock valued at approximately $42,000 have been issued under the 2011 Plan and Non-Employee Director Compensation Plan as compensation to outside directors.
|
|
The Company’s prior stock option plan terminated on February 27, 2011. At September 30, 2012, no options were available for grant under this plan. Options must be exercised within ten years of the date of grant.
|
A summary of the activity in the prior plan is as follows:
|
Number of
Options
|
Weighted-
Average
Exercise
Price
|
Weighted-
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Term
|
Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value
|
||||||||||||
Outstanding at December 31, 2011
|
50,900 | $ | 34.31 | ||||||||||||
Options forfeited
|
(11,392 | ) | 32.97 | ||||||||||||
Outstanding and exercisable at September 30, 2012
|
39,508 | $ | 34.70 |
2.3 years
|
$ | 0 |
(7)
|
Fair Value Measurements. Securities available for sale measured at fair value on a recurring basis are summarized below (in thousands):
|
Fair Value Measurements at Reporting Date Using
|
||||||||||||||||
Fair
Value
|
Quoted Prices
In Active
Markets for
Identical
Assets
(Level 1)
|
Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)
|
Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)
|
|||||||||||||
As of September 30, 2012-
|
||||||||||||||||
Mortgage-backed securities
|
$ | 21,588 | $ | 0 | $ | 21,588 | $ | 0 | ||||||||
As of December 31, 2011-
|
||||||||||||||||
Mortgage-backed securities
|
$ | 28,907 | $ | 0 | $ | 28,907 | $ | 0 |
23 |
(7)
|
Fair Value Measurements, Continued. There were no transfers of securities between levels of inputs for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011.
|
|
Impaired collateral-dependent loans are carried at fair value when the current collateral value less estimated selling costs is lower than the carrying value of the loan. Those impaired collateral-dependent loans which are measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis are as follows (in thousands):
|
Losses Recorded in Operations
For the Nine Months Ended September 30,
2012
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
At September 30, 2012
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fair
Value
|
Level 1
|
Level 2
|
Level 3
|
Total
Losses
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Residential real estate- | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Closed-end first mortgages
|
$ | 1,294 | $ | 0 | $ | 0 | $ | 1,294 | $ | 451 | $ | 0 | ||||||||||||
Commercial real estate:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Non-owner-occupied
|
8,997 | 0 | 0 | 8,997 | 2,484 | 0 | ||||||||||||||||||
Land and construction
|
905 | 0 | 0 | 905 | 449 | 0 | ||||||||||||||||||
$ | 11,196 | $ | 0 | $ | 0 | $ | 11,196 | $ | 3,384 | $ | 0 |
Losses
Recorded in
Operations
For the
Year Ended
December 31,
2011 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
At December 31, 2011
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fair
Value
|
Level 1
|
Level 2
|
Level 3
|
Total
Losses
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Residential real estate- | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Closed-end first mortgages
|
$ | 1,591 | $ | 0 | $ | 0 | $ | 1,591 | $ | 545 | $ | 308 | ||||||||||||
Commercial real estate:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Owner-occupied
|
291 | 0 | 0 | 291 | 8 | 8 | ||||||||||||||||||
Non-owner-occupied
|
6,540 | 0 | 0 | 6,540 | 2,652 | 150 | ||||||||||||||||||
Land and construction
|
6,793 | 0 | 0 | 6,793 | 1,511 | 834 | ||||||||||||||||||
$ | 15,215 | $ | 0 | $ | 0 | $ | 15,215 | $ | 4,716 | $ | 1,300 |
24 |
(7)
|
Fair Value Measurements, Continued. Foreclosed real estate is recorded at fair value less estimated costs to sell. Foreclosed real estate which is measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis is as follows (in thousands):
|
Losses
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Recorded
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fair
|
Total
|
During the
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Value
|
Level 1
|
Level 2
|
Level 3
|
Losses
|
Period
|
|||||||||||||||||||
At September 30, 2012
|
$ | 10,444 | $ | 0 | $ | 0 | $ | 10,444 | $ | 842 | $ | 70 | ||||||||||||
At December 31, 2011
|
$ | 7,646 | $ | 0 | $ | 0 | $ | 7,646 | $ | 772 | $ | 772 |
|
The estimated fair values and fair value measurement method with respect to the Company’s financial instruments were as follows (in thousands):
|
At September 30, 2012
|
At December 31, 2011
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Carrying
|
Fair
|
Carrying
|
Fair
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Amount
|
Value
|
Level
|
Amount
|
Value
|
Level
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Financial assets:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents
|
$ | 27,367 | $ | 27,367 | 1 | $ | 22,776 | $ | 22,776 | 1 | ||||||||||||||
Securities available for sale
|
21,588 | 21,588 | 2 | 28,907 | 28,907 | 2 | ||||||||||||||||||
Loans
|
85,451 | 85,298 | 3 | 89,217 | 89,069 | 3 | ||||||||||||||||||
Federal Home Loan Bank stock
|
1,478 | 1,478 | 3 | 2,159 | 2,159 | 3 | ||||||||||||||||||
Accrued interest receivable
|
477 | 477 | 3 | 499 | 499 | 3 | ||||||||||||||||||
Financial liabilities:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Deposit liabilities
|
105,526 | 106,065 | 1,3 | 107,895 | 108,461 | 1,3 | ||||||||||||||||||
Federal Home Loan Bank advances
|
27,700 | 29,884 | 3 | 31,700 | 33,920 | 3 | ||||||||||||||||||
Junior subordinated debenture
|
5,155 | 4,836 | 3 | 5,155 | 4,734 | 3 | ||||||||||||||||||
Off-balance sheet financial instruments
|
0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
|
Discussion regarding the assumptions used to compute the estimated fair values of financial instruments can be found in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements included in the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011.
|
25 |
|
●
|
The Board of the Company must take appropriate steps to fully utilize the Company’s financial and managerial resources to serve as a source of strength to the Bank, including, but not limited to, taking steps to ensure that the Bank complies with the Consent Order entered into with the OFR and the FDIC and any other supervisory action taken by the Bank’s state or federal regulator.
|
|
●
|
The Company may not declare or pay any dividends without prior Reserve Bank and Federal Reserve approval.
|
|
●
|
The Company may not, directly or indirectly, take dividends or any other form of payment representing a reduction in capital from the Bank without prior Reserve Bank approval.
|
|
●
|
The Company and its nonbank subsidiary, OptimumBank Holdings Capital Trust I, may not make any distributions of interest, principal, or other sums on subordinated debentures or trust preferred securities without the prior written approval of the Reserve Bank and the Federal Reserve.
|
|
●
|
The Company and its nonbank subsidiary, OptimumBank Holdings Capital Trust I, may not, directly or indirectly, incur, increase, or guarantee any debt or purchase or redeem any shares of its stock without the prior written approval of the Reserve Bank.
|
|
●
|
The Company must obtain prior written consent from the Reserve Bank before appointing any new director or senior executive officer, or changing the responsibilities of any senior executive officer so that the officer would assume a different senior executive officer position, and must comply with the regulations applicable to indemnification and severance payments.
|
|
●
|
The Company must provide quarterly progress reports to the Reserve Bank, along with parent company only financial statements.
|
26 |
|
●
|
The Board of the Bank is required to increase its participation in the affairs of the Bank and assume full responsibility for the approval of sound policies and objectives for the supervision of all of the Bank’s activities.
|
|
●
|
The Bank is required to have and retain qualified and appropriately experienced senior management, including a chief executive officer, a chief lending officer and a chief financial officer, who are given the authority to implement the provisions of the Consent Order.
|
|
●
|
Any proposed changes in the Bank's Board of Directors or senior executive officers are subject to the prior consent of the FDIC and the OFR.
|
|
●
|
The Bank is required to maintain both a fully funded allowance for loan and lease losses satisfactory to the FDIC and the OFR and a minimum Tier 1 leverage capital ratio of 8% and a total risk-based capital ratio of 12% for as long as the Consent Order remains in effect.
|
|
●
|
The Bank must undertake over a two-year period a scheduled reduction of the balance of loans classified “substandard” and “doubtful” in its 2009 FDIC examination by at least 75%.
|
|
●
|
The Bank is required to reduce the volume of its adversely classified private label mortgage backed securities under a plan acceptable to the FDIC and OFR.
|
|
●
|
The Bank must submit to the FDIC and the OFR for their review and comment a written business/strategic plan covering the overall operation of the Bank.
|
|
●
|
The Bank must implement a plan to improve earnings, addressing goals and strategies for improving and sustaining earnings, major areas for improvement in the Bank’s operating performance, realistic and comprehensive budgets and a budget review process.
|
27 |
(9) Regulatory Matters – Bank, Continued.
|
|||||
●
|
The Bank is required to revise, implement and incorporate recommendations of the FDIC and OFR with respect to the following policies or plans:
|
||||
o
|
Lending and Collection Policies
|
||||
o
|
Investment Policy
|
||||
o
|
Liquidity, Contingency Funding and Funds Management Plan
|
||||
o
|
Interest Rate Risk Management Policy
|
||||
o
|
Internal Loan Review and Grading System;
|
||||
o
|
Internal Control Policy; and
|
||||
o
|
A plan to reduce concentration in commercial real estate loans;
|
||||
●
|
The Bank’s Board of Directors must review the adequacy of the allowance for loan and lease losses and establish a comprehensive policy satisfactory to the FDIC and OFR for determining such adequacy at least quarterly thereafter.
|
||||
●
|
The Bank may not pay any dividends or bonuses without the prior approval of the FDIC.
|
||||
●
|
The Bank may not accept, renew or rollover any brokered deposits except with the prior approval of the FDIC.
|
||||
●
|
The Bank is required to notify the FDIC and OFR prior to undertaking asset growth of 10% or more per annum while the Consent Order remains in effect.
|
||||
●
|
The Bank is required to file quarterly progress reports with the FDIC and the OFR.
|
||||
Management believes that the Bank is currently in substantial compliance with all the requirements of the Consent Order except for the following requirements:
|
|||||
●
|
Scheduled reductions by October 31, 2011, and April 30, 2012, of 60% and 75%, respectively, of loans classified as substandard and doubtful in the 2009 FDIC Examination;
|
||||
●
|
Retention of a qualified chief executive officer; and
|
||||
●
|
Development of a plan to reduce Bank’s concentration in commercial real estate loans acceptable to the supervisory authorities.
|
||||
The Bank has implemented comprehensive policies and plans to address all of the requirements of the Consent Order and has incorporated recommendations from the FDIC and OFR into these policies and plans.
|
|||||
(10) Junior Subordinated Debenture. The terms of the debenture agreement allow the Company to defer payments of interest on the debenture by extending the interest payment period at any time during the term of the debenture for up to twenty consecution quarterly periods. The Company has elected its right to defer payment of interest on the debenture. Accrued and unpaid interest on the debenture totaled $446,629 at September 30, 2012.
|
28 |
|
●
|
Scheduled reductions by October 31, 2011, and April 30, 2012, of 60% and 75%, respectively, of loans classified as substandard and doubtful in the 2009 FDIC Examination;
|
|
●
|
Retention of a qualified
chief executive officer and a chief lending officer; and
|
|
●
|
Development of a plan to reduce Bank’s concentration in commercial real estate loans acceptable to the supervisory authorities. |
29 |
FDIC Guideline Requirements | ||||||||||||||||||||
September 30,
2012 |
December 31,
2011 |
Adequately-Capitalized
|
Well-
Capitalized
|
Consent
Order
|
||||||||||||||||
Tier I risk-based capital ratio
|
12.64 | 11.22 | 4.00 | 6.00 | * | |||||||||||||||
Total risk-based capital ratio
|
13.90 | 12.48 | 8.00 | 10.00 | 12.00 | |||||||||||||||
Leverage ratio
|
9.21 | 7.76 | 4.00 | 5.00 | 8.00 |
30 |
Nine Months
|
Nine Months
|
|||||||||||
Ended
|
Year Ended
|
Ended
|
||||||||||
September
30,
|
December 31,
|
September 30,
|
||||||||||
2012
|
2011
|
2011
|
||||||||||
Average equity as a percentage of average assets
|
5.11 | % | 1.04 | % | 0.13 | % | ||||||
Equity to total assets at end of period
|
5.91 | % | 4.39 | % | (1.02 | )% | ||||||
Return on average assets (1)
|
(2.08 | )% | (2.11 | )% | (2.72 | )% | ||||||
Return on average equity (1)
|
(40.75 | )% | (203.97 | )% | (129.87 | )% | ||||||
Noninterest expenses to average assets (1)
|
3.41 | % | 4.08 | % | 4.19 | % |
|
(1)
|
Annualized for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011.
|
Despite the slowing of the decline in real estate values in South Florida, we continue to experience the adverse effects of the prolonged real estate devaluation resulting in significant levels of non-performing loans, foreclosed real estate and loan charge-offs. Management, however, is committed to minimizing further losses in the loan portfolio and reducing our nonperforming assets.
Deposits are our primary source of funds. Under the Consent Order, the interest rates that we pay on our market area deposits and our ability to accept brokered deposits are restricted. The restriction on brokered deposits is not expected to alter the Bank's current deposit gathering activities since the Bank has not accepted, renewed or rolled over any brokered deposits since December 2009. With respect to the yield limitations, it is possible that the Bank could experience a decrease in deposit inflows, or the migration of current deposits to competitor institutions, if other institutions offer higher interest rates than those permitted to be offered by the Bank. Despite these yield limitations, we believe that we have the ability to adjust rates on our deposits to attract or retain deposits as needed.
31 |
32 |
Three Months Ended September 30,
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
2012
|
2011
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest
|
Average
|
Interest
|
Average
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Average
|
and
|
Yield/
|
Average
|
and
|
Yield/
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Balance
|
Dividends
|
Rate
|
Balance
|
Dividends
|
Rate
|
|||||||||||||||||||
($ in thousands)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest-earning assets:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Loans
|
$ | 89,022 | $ | 1,025 | 4.61 | % | $ | 102,825 | $ | 1,121 | 4.36 | % | ||||||||||||
Securities
|
24,661 | 245 | 3.97 | 38,281 | 378 | 3.95 | ||||||||||||||||||
Other (1)
|
25,838 | 22 | 0.34 | 20,881 | 17 | 0.33 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total interest-earning assets/interest income
|
139,521 | 1,292 | 3.70 | 161,987 | 1,516 | 3.74 | ||||||||||||||||||
Cash and due from banks
|
2,399 | 27 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Premises and equipment
|
2,804 | 2,726 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Other
|
7,232 | 5,363 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Total assets
|
$ | 151,956 | $ | 170,103 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Interest-bearing liabilities:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Savings, NOW and money-market deposits
|
35,837 | 57 | 0.64 | 34,491 | 62 | 0.72 | ||||||||||||||||||
Time deposits
|
70,228 | 215 | 1.22 | 97,033 | 379 | 1.56 | ||||||||||||||||||
Borrowings (2)
|
34,116 | 359 | 4.21 | 36,855 | 389 | 4.22 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total interest-bearing liabilities/interest expense
|
140,181 | 631 | 1.80 | 168,379 | 830 | 1.97 | ||||||||||||||||||
Noninterest-bearing demand deposits
|
1,069 | 570 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Other liabilities
|
2,299 | 2,836 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Stockholders’ equity
|
8,407 | (1,682 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity
|
$ | 151,956 | $ | 170,103 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Net interest income
|
$ | 661 | $ | 686 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Interest-rate spread (3)
|
1.90 | % | 1.77 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
Net interest margin (4)
|
1.81 | % | 1.69 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
Ratio of average interest-earning assets to average interest-bearing liabilities
|
1.00 | 0.96 |
(1)
|
Includes interest-earning deposits with banks, federal funds sold and Federal Home Loan Bank stock dividends.
|
(2)
|
Includes Federal Home Loan Bank advances, other borrowings and junior subordinated debenture.
|
(3)
|
Interest-rate spread represents the difference between the average yield on interest-earning assets and the average cost of interest-bearing liabilities.
|
(4)
|
Net interest margin is net interest income divided by average interest-earning assets.
|
33 |
Nine Months Ended September 30,
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
2012 | 2011 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest
|
Average
|
Interest
|
Average
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Average
|
and
|
Yield/
|
Average
|
and
|
Yield/
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Balance
|
Dividends
|
Rate
|
Balance
|
Dividends
|
Rate
|
|||||||||||||||||||
($ in thousands)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest-earning assets:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Loans
|
$ | 89,607 | $ | 3,002 | 4.47 | % | $ | 107,650 | $ | 3,607 | 4.47 | % | ||||||||||||
Securities
|
26,530 | 819 | 4.12 | 47,309 | 1,407 | 3.97 | ||||||||||||||||||
Other (1)
|
25,085 | 60 | 0.32 | 17,844 | 46 | 0.34 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total interest-earning assets/interest income
|
141,222 | 3,881 | 3.66 | 172,803 | 5,060 | 3.90 | ||||||||||||||||||
Cash and due from banks
|
1,594 | 349 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Premises and equipment
|
2,726 | 2,757 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Other
|
6,760 | 5,052 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Total assets
|
$ | 152,308 | $ | 180,961 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Interest-bearing liabilities:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Savings, NOW and money-market deposits
|
35,336 | 169 | 0.64 | 35,615 | 215 | 0.80 | ||||||||||||||||||
Time deposits
|
70,089 | 679 | 1.29 | 104,861 | 1,274 | 1.62 | ||||||||||||||||||
Borrowings (2)
|
35,942 | 1,136 | 4.21 | 36,855 | 1,153 | 4.17 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total interest-bearing liabilities/interest expense
|
141,367 | 1,984 | 1.87 | 177,331 | 2,642 | 1.99 | ||||||||||||||||||
Noninterest-bearing demand deposits
|
728 | 521 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Other liabilities
|
2,435 | 2,878 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Stockholders’ equity
|
7,777 | 231 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity
|
$ | 152,308 | $ | 180,961 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Net interest income
|
$ | 1,897 | $ | 2,418 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Interest-rate spread (3)
|
1.79 | % | 1.91 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
Net interest margin (4)
|
1.79 | % | 1.87 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
Ratio of average interest-earning assets to average interest-bearing liabilities
|
1.00 | 0.97 |
(1)
|
Includes interest-bearing deposits in banks, federal funds sold and Federal Home Loan Bank stock dividends.
|
(2)
|
Includes Federal Home Loan Bank advances, other borrowings and junior subordinated debenture.
|
(3)
|
Interest-rate spread represents the difference between the average yield on interest-earning assets and the average cost of interest-bearing liabilities.
|
(4)
|
Net interest margin is net interest income divided by average interest-earning assets.
|
34 |
|
General. Net loss for the three months ended September 30, 2012, was $1.0 million or $(.04) per basic and diluted share compared to a net loss of $0.6 million or $(.69) per basic and diluted share for the period ended September 30, 2011. This increase in the Company’s net loss was primarily due to a increase in the provision for loan losses.
|
|
Interest Income. Interest income decreased to $1.3 million for the three months ended September 30, 2012 from $1.5 million for the three months ended September 30, 2011. Interest income on loans primarily decreased as a result of a decrease in the average loan portfolio balance for the three months ended September 30, 2012. Interest on securities decreased to $0.2 million due primarily to a decrease in the average balance of the securities portfolio in 2012.
|
|
Interest Expense. Interest expense decreased to $0.6 million for the three months ended September 30, 2012 from $0.8 million for the three months ended September 30, 2011. Interest expense decreased primarily because of a decrease in the average yield paid during 2012 and a decrease in the average balance of time deposits.
|
|
Provision for Loan Losses. The provision for the three months ended September 30, 2012, was $0.2 million compared to $(0.2) million for the same period in 2011. The provision for loan losses is charged to operations as losses are estimated to have occurred in order to bring the total allowance for loan losses to a level deemed appropriate by management to absorb losses inherent in the portfolio at September 30, 2012. Management’s periodic evaluation of the adequacy of the allowance is based upon historical experience, the volume and type of lending conducted by us, adverse situations that may affect the borrower’s ability to repay, estimated value of the underlying collateral, loans identified as impaired, general economic conditions, particularly as they relate to our market areas, and other factors related to the estimated collectability of our loan portfolio. The allowance for loan losses totaled $1.9 million or 2.2% of loans outstanding at September 2012, compared to $2.3 million, or 2.6% of loans outstanding at December 31, 2011. Management believes the balance in the allowance for loan losses at September 30, 2012 is adequate.
|
|
Noninterest Income. Total noninterest income remained unchanged at $10,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011.
|
|
Noninterest Expenses. Total noninterest expenses decreased to $1.4 million for the three months ended September 30, 2012 compared to $1.5 million for the three months ended September 30, 2011 primarily as a result of a reduction in professional fees.
|
35 |
|
General. Net loss for the nine months ended September 30, 2012, was $2.4 million or $(.09) per basic and diluted share compared to a net loss of $3.7 million or $(4.50) per basic and diluted share for the period ended September 30, 2011. This decrease in the Company’s net loss was primarily due to decreases in foreclosed real estate expense, provision for loan losses and professional fees.
|
|
Interest
Income. Interest income decreased to $3.9 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 compared to
$5.1 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2011. Interest income on loans decreased $600,000 to $3.0
million due primarily to a decrease in the average loan portfolio balance for the nine months ended September 30, 2012
compared to the same period in 2011. Interest on securities decreased by $600,000 to $0.8 million due primarily to
a decrease in the average balance of the securities portfolio in 2012.
|
|
Interest Expense. Interest expense decreased to $2.0 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2012, from $2.6 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2011. Interest expense on deposits decreased primarily because of a decrease in the average balance in 2012.
|
|
Provision for Loan Losses. The provision for the nine months ended September 30, 2012, was $0.4 million compared to $0.7 million for the same period in 2011. The provision for loan losses is charged to operations as losses are estimated to have occurred in order to bring the total allowance for loan losses to a level deemed appropriate by management to absorb losses inherent in the loan portfolio at September 30, 2012. Management’s periodic evaluation of the adequacy of the allowance is based upon historical experience, the volume and type of lending conducted by us, adverse situations that may affect the borrower’s ability to repay, estimated value of the underlying collateral, loans identified as impaired, general economic conditions, particularly as they relate to our market areas, and other factors related to the estimated collectability of our loan portfolio. The allowance for loan losses totaled $1.9 million or 2.2% of loans outstanding at September 30, 2012, compared to $2.3 million, or 2.6% of loans outstanding at December 31, 2011. Management believes the balance in the allowance for loan losses at September 30, 2012 is adequate.
|
|
Noninterest Income. Total noninterest income decreased to $198,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2012, from $232,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2011.
|
|
Noninterest Expenses. Total noninterest expenses decreased to $3.9 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 from $5.7 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2011, primarily due to a $0.7 million decrease in foreclosed real estate expense, $0.5 million decrease in professional fees and a $0.3 million decrease in regulatory assessment.
|
36 |
37 |
OPTIMUMBANK HOLDINGS, INC. (Registrant) |
|||||
Date: |
November 14 , 2012
|
|
By:
|
/s/ Richard L. Browdy
|
|
Richard L. Browdy
|
|||||
President and Chief Financial Officer
|
|||||
(Principal Executive Officer and Principal
Financial Officer)
|
38 |
Exhibit No.
|
Description
|
||
3.1
|
Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation (incorporated by reference from Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on March 30, 2012)
|
||
4.1
|
Bylaws (incorporated by reference from Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on May 11, 2004)
|
||
4.2
|
Form of stock certificate (incorporated by reference from Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB filed with the SEC on August 12, 2004)
|
||
4.3
|
Form of Registration Rights Agreement between OptimumBank Holdings, Inc. and Investors (incorporated by reference from Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on October 31, 2011)
|
||
4.4
|
The Company has outstanding certain long-term debt. None of such debt exceeds ten percent of the Company’s total assets; therefore, copies of the constituent instruments defining the rights of the holders of such debt are not included as exhibits. Copies of instruments with respect to such long-term debt will be furnished to the SEC upon request.
|
||
10.1
|
OptimumBank Holdings, Inc. Non-Employee Director Compensation Plan (incorporated by reference from Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on March 30, 2012)
|
||
10.2
|
Amended and Restated Stock Purchase Agreement, dated as of December 5 2011, between OptimumBank Holdings, Inc. and Moishe Gubin (incorporated by reference from Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on March 30, 2012)
|
||
10.3
|
First Amendment dated June 29, 2012 to Amended and Restated Stock Purchase Agreement between OptimumBank Holdings, Inc. and Moishe Gubin dated December 5, 2011 (incorporated by reference from Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on July 6, 2012)
|
||
10.4 | Second First Amendment dated October 25, 2012 to Amended and Restated Stock Purchase Agreement between OptimumBank Holdings, Inc. and Moishe Gubin dated December 5, 2011 | ||
31.1
|
|||
32.1
|
|||
101.INS
|
XBRL Instance Document
|
||
101.SCH
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document
|
||
101.CAL
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document
|
||
101.LAB
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document
|
||
101.PRE
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document
|
||
101.DEF
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document
|
39 |