UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

 

FORM 10-K

 

[X] ANNUAL REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
 
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2011
 
[  ] TRANSITION REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT
 

For the transition period from _________ to ________

 

Commission file number: 000-25911

 

Skinvisible, Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Nevada 88-0344219

(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)

 

(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
6320 South Sandhill Road, Suite 10, Las Vegas, NV 89120
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)

 

Registrant’s telephone number: 702.433.7154

 

 



Securities registered under Section 12(b) of the Exchange Act:

 

Title of each class Name of each exchange on which registered
none not applicable

 

Securities registered under Section 12(g) of the Exchange Act:

 

Title of each class
Common Stock, par value $0.001

 

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes [ ] No [X]

 

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes [ ] No [X]

 

Indicate by checkmark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act during the past 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes [X] No [ ]

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes [ ] No [X]

 

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§ 229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. Yes [ ] No [X]

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company.

 

[ ] Large accelerated filer [ ] Accelerated filer
[ ] Non-accelerated filer [X] Smaller reporting company

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes [ ] No [X]

 

State the aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates computed by reference to the price at which the common equity was last sold, or the average bid and asked price of such common equity, as of the last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter. $3,261,720.

 

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the registrant’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date. 106,592,159 common shares as of April 13, 2011

 
Table of Contents

TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

Page

PART I

 

Item 1. Business 3
Item 2. Properties 11
Item 3. Legal Proceedings 11
Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures 11

 

PART II

 

Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity and Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

11

 

Item 6. Selected Financial Data 15
Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations 15
Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk 18
Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data 18
Item 9. Changes In and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure 19
Item 9A(T). Controls and Procedures 19
Item 9B. Other Information 19

 

PART III

 

Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance 20
Item 11. Executive Compensation 22
Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters 25
Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence 26
Item 14. Principal Accountant Fees and Services 27

 

PART IV

 

Item 15. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules 27
2
Table of Contents

PART I

 

Item 1. Business

 

Company Overview

 

We develop innovative polymer delivery vehicles and related compositions that hold active ingredients on the skin for extended periods of time when applied topically. We designed a process for combining water soluble and insoluble polymers that is specifically formulated to carry water insoluble and certain cationic active ingredients in water-based products without the use of alcohol, silicones, waxes, or other organic solvents. This enables active agents the ability to perform their intended functions for an extended period of time. Our polymer delivery vehicles, trademarked Invisicare®, allow normal skin respiration and perspiration. The polymer compositions we develop wear off as part of the natural exfoliation process of the skin's outer layer cells.

 

We believe Invisicare® offers the following benefits:

 

- Displays superior skin adherence for extended time periods

- Non-occlusive yet resists water wash-off, respiration and perspiration

- Increased efficacy of active ingredients

- Allows for lower use levels of actives with increased persistence of effect

- Offers advantage of controlled and/or sustained time-release

- Highly compatible with a variety of actives and bases

- Easy to emulsify

- Formulates well at a cream, lotion, or spray viscosity

- Non-irritating emulsion dries quickly with no greasy after-feel

- Non-occlusive film forms protective barrier against environmental irritants

- Broad polymer selection to meet application requirements

- Offers “Life Cycle” management to core products with potential for new patent

- Simplified manufacturing process

 

Products that successfully incorporate Invisicare to date include acne, antimicrobial hand sanitizer lotions, suncare products, skincare moisturizers, sunless tanning products as well as various dermatology, women’s health, pain management and other pharmaceutical products for various disorders. On an ongoing basis, we are seeking to develop polymer formulations that can successfully be incorporated into other products.

 

Our primary objective is to license Invisicare to established brand manufacturers and marketers of prescription and over-the-counter products in the dermatological, medical, cosmetic, and other pharmaceutical markets. With the exception of sales to one vendor, our management’s policy is to only sell Invisicare to vendors that have executed a license agreement with us. We conduct our research and development in-house. We engage an outside party that currently handles all of our manufacturing and distribution needs.

3
Table of Contents

Our Business

 

Our core business is the research and development of products formulated with our patented technology Invisicare. Our continued focus is on the licensing of these products and developing new Invisicare technologies. Our focus has allowed us to expand our reputation amongst key dermatology, consumer goods and medical/surgical companies around the globe. It has also allowed us to branch out beyond dermatology into other medical areas that require topically delivered products.

 

Our Products

 

We intend to expand our product offerings. Currently we have over 30 topical products formulated with Invisicare available for licensing. Our products range from acne formations to sunscreens to surgical products.

 

ACNE:

·Adapalene Cream & Gel (.1%, .3%)*
·Clindamycin Hydrochloride Cream (1%)*
·Retinoic Acid Cream & Gel (0.1%)*
·Salicylic Acid Cream (2%)
·Benzoyl Peroxide Cream (2.5% TBD)
-Delivered with a sustained release which also allows for more or less active to be released over a longer period of time;
-Reduced skin irritation from most actives;
-Superior adherence; stays on the skin and does not rub off.
 

ACTINIC KERATOSIS:

·Imiquimod Lotion (2%, 3%)*
-Delivered with a controlled release which also allows for less or more active to be released (8% to 40%) than the branded product (10%) and over a longer period of time;
-Binds to the skin resisting rub off.
 

ANTI-INFLAMMATORIES / ANALGESICS / ANTIPRURITICS:

·Hydrocortisone Cream (.5%, 1%)
·Triamcinolone / Acetonide (1%)*
·Clobetasole Proprionate (0.05%)*
·Betamethasone (1%)*
·Pramoxine Cream (1%)
·Pramoxine (1.1%) and Hydrocortisone (2.3%)
·Menthol Spray / Roll-on / Cream (6%, 8%)
·Ibuprofen Cream (5%, 10%)
-Formulations enhanced with Invisicare have the advantage of sustained release and adherence thereby delivering long-lasting results;
-ie/ Release of Pramoxine is 3 times the branded product with 20% greater adherence.
 

ANTI-FUNGALS:

·Terbinafine Cream & Gel (1%)
·Clotrimazole Cream (1%)
·Naftifine Cream (1%)*
-Formulated with sustained release to deliver efficacious results – ie/ Terbinafine cream can release over 4 times branded product;
-Superior adherence properties.
 
4
Table of Contents

ANTIMICORBIAL HAND SANITIZERS / ANTISEPTICS:

·Triclosan Lotion (1%) & Nonoxynol-9 /Tomadol 901
·First Aid Antiseptic Triclosan (1%) & Allantoin (1%)
·Benzalkonium Chloride Lotion (0.13%)
·Chlorhexidine Gluconate Lotion (4%)
·Chlorhexidine Gluconate (2%) Pre-Surgical Prep
-Antimicrobials bind to the skin for up to 4 hours;
-Anti-bacterial and anti-viral testing successfully completed on several formulations;
-Pre-op preparation delivers on-going protection even with irrigation;No staining or odor with chlorhexidine formulations.
 

ATOPIC DERMATITIS / SUPER MOISTURIZERS:

·Non-Steroidal Atopic Dermatitis Cream Hyaluronic Acid (1%)
·Skin Protectant Lotion with Allantoin (1%)
·Ectoin Anti-Aging (2%) / Super Moisturizer (1%)
·Urea Moisturizer (10%, 25% & 30%*)
-Skinvisible’s creams and lotions hold on the skin while resisting wash-off and rub-off;
-Invisicare polymers provide enhanced skin barrier function while still allowing the skin to breathe normally;
-Formulations have a smooth, silky feel with no residual oily feeling;
-Non-Steroidal Atopic Dermatitis Cream could be marketed with only a 510K in the United States and as a medical device in Canada. Some preliminary toxicity data is available.
 

UVA / UVB SUNSCREENS:

·Avobenzone (Parsol 1789) - SPF 15 / 30 / 50 Lotion
·Tinosorb S – SPF 15 / 30 / 50 Lotion
-Photo-stability studies showed a minimum of 8 hours for both Invisicare sunscreen formulations;
-Sunscreens remain bound longer than popular brands even after perspiring and swimming ie/ Skinvisible’s avobenzone SPF 30 remained 81% bound after 2 hours versus leading brands showing only 50% to 73%. Skinvisible’s Tinosorb sunscreen remained 87% bound vs a leading brand with 64% bound.
 
5
Table of Contents

OTHER:

·Incontinence / Diaper Barrier Cream DPHP (1% Dipalmitoyl hydroxyproline)
-Skinvisible’s DPHP cream provides a protease inhibitor and a polymer delivery system that binds to the skin, creates a non-occlusive barrier, and that is resistant to wash off or rubbed off;
-Invisicare polymers provide an excellent barrier function even on their own.
·Skin Barrier Cream (WorkGluv)
-Studies show WorkGluv barrier function resists penetration of many noxious chemicals and can protect hands from irritant contact dermatitis.
·Scar Lotion with Onion Bulb
-Onion Bulb Extract diminishes the appearance of scars and lightens discoloration.
·Fragrance – Long Lasting Gel
-A scent incorporated with Invisicare provides a long lasting fragrance in a gel formulation.
·Sunless Tanner – Long Lasting Lotions (2.5%, 5% & 9%)
-Skinvisible sunless tanners remain on the skin for 7 days versus 3 days for branded formulas along with a darker, more uniform tan with no orange color and an improved odor.
·After Sun (Aloe) Cream
-Skinvisible’s After Sun Cream delivers soothing aloe to help relieve sunburn.

 

*prescription

License Agreements

 

Set forth below are our current licensees, along with their developed products that contain our Invisicare product or our own products with Invisicare in the territories provided:

 

Licensee Product Licensed Territories Status of Current Territories Marketed
 Dermal Defense Safe4Hours®, an antimicrobial hand sanitizer US, Canada and Mexico US and Canada
Panalab Internacional S.A. acne prescription formulations with the active ingredient adapalene Latin America Completing regulatory approvals; no date for entering market.
Embil Pharmaceuticals prescription acne products (Clindamycin HCL and Retinoic Acid formulations) Turkey parts of Asia (Indonesia, Malaysia, and the Philippines) and Azerbaijan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Turkmenistan, and Uzbekistan Seeking regulatory approval. Upon completion of their manufacturing plant this summer they expect to be in market in Q4 of 2012.
RHEI Pharmaceuticals NV Hand sanitizer, DermSafe (RHEI has trademarked the product HandSafe™). Commercial rights to Europe. Obtained approved in Belgium, Not marketing as yet.
Mayquest Pharmaceuticals PTE. Ltd. DermSafe Singapore, Indonesia, the Philippines, Thailand and Malaysia Received regulatory approval in Singapore to import and retail. Looking to sublicense rights.
Alto Pharmaceuticals DermSafe Canada Health Canada approval obtained for Commercial Use.  Marketing now.
Womens Choice Pharmaceuticals Hemorrhoid cream ProCort® United States Marketing now through-out the United States.

 

6
Table of Contents

Recent Developments

 

Feasibility Agreement

 

In February of 2012, we entered into a feasibility agreement with Novartis, AG. This project continues to progress and has been extended for a further six month period with development results scheduled to be provided to Novartis by the second quarter of 2012.

 

Launch of Hand Sanitizer in Canada

 

Our DermSafe antimicrobial hand sanitizer was officially launched by Alto Pharmaceuticals (“Alto”) in Canada on September 1, 2011. Alto, a Toronto-based dermatology focused company, has licensed the exclusive rights to DermSafe for commercial use in Canada. Alto will market the product under the name DermSafePC and is targeting institutions like schools, police forces, and penitentiaries seeking for an alternative to alcohol due to safety and long-term efficacy concerns.

 

Hand Sanitizer DermSafe receives Dermatology Seal of Approval

 

DermSafe Hand Sanitizing Lotion has received the “Seal of Approval” from the Dermatology Review Panel™ (“DRP”). DRP is an independent panel of dermatologists that reviews scientific data for non-prescription products in order to authenticate the product’s claims. The DRP dermatologists evaluated our scientific data and validated the following claims for DermSafe Hand Sanitizer: DermSafe is alcohol-free, it offers protection from harmful bacteria for up to four hours, it resists wash-off and it provides a moisture barrier for the hands. DermSafe, marketed by Alto Pharmaceuticals in Canada, will soon display the DRP Seal on its promotional materials and packaging. Claims made by over-the-counter products can be confusing to the consumer so the DRP program was formed to provide an independent, arms-length review of a product’s scientific data in support of its claims. The DRP Seal of Approval helps consumers and medical professionals easily identify products that meet the panel's approval standards.

7
Table of Contents

Launch of Hand Sanitizer in the EU

 

In July of 2011, we entered into a revised agreement with RHEI Pharmaceuticals, NV, a global pharmaceutical business development firm, with special focus on bringing core medicines from the U.S., Europe and Japan into the fast-growing South-East Asian marketplace. We licensed the commercial rights to our patent pending DermSafe hand sanitizer to RHEI for the commercial rights for the EU for $500,000 of which $300,000 has been received. RHEI received regulatory approval in Belgium in 2011 to begin marketing in the EU. RHEI is undertaking clinical studies for the product in Belgium to use to promote DermSafe’s benefits through the healthcare market. Due to the added expenses to be incurred for the clinical trial(s) the revised agreement allows RHEI to delay payment of the balance due of $200,000 into 2012. An agreement has been made allowing RHEI to import DermSafe from Skinvisible’s Canadian licensee, Alto Pharmaceuticals, Inc., who is now manufacturing product Alto has also agreed to supply other territories globally with finished product, giving new licensees a very quick to market option.

 

Launch of First Prescription Product in US Market

 

In July of 2011, our licensee, Women's Choice Pharmaceuticals LLC, a specialty pharmaceutical company based in Arizona, launched ProCort, Skinvisible's first prescription product in the United States. ProCort is a topical treatment for hemorrhoids formulated with our patented delivery system Invisicare. ProCort is made of a combination of hydrocortisone acetate and pramoxine hydrochloride. ProCort is a prescription product focused on the women's health market.

 

Women's Choice Pharmaceuticals has been granted the exclusive rights to commercialize our product within the United States. We have received a development fee and now will receive a license fee paid in milestones plus on-going royalties based on product sales. Six month sales ending December 31, 2011 exceeded $200,000 and they are on line for first year (12 month period) sales of $1 million to $1.5 million. Women's Choice Pharmaceuticals' revenue forecast for ProCort is $20 million by its third year.

 

Patent Developments

 

We intend to continually generate new patents (intellectual property) on our Invisicare technology as well as on the dermatology and medical products we have formulated. Our patent protection continued to increase in 2011 with the issuance of new patents for Invisicare including Canada and Europe. Including the previous patents granted for Invisicare in the United States, Australia, India, China, Japan, S. Korea, Hong Kong, these new patents brings the number of patents issued for Invisicare to nine.

 

In February the Canadian Patent Office issued a Notice of Allowance for the comprehensive technology patent for Skinvisible’s Invisicare polymer delivery system. The Canadian patent for Invisicare (Patent number 758/10701.492) includes a total of forty-eight claims. This patent protects Invisicare in three key areas: 'Topical Composition', ‘Topical Composition Precursor’, and ‘Methods for Manufacturing and Using'.

8
Table of Contents

The European Patent Office (EPO) granted our European patent application number 02752847.0 pertaining to our drug delivery system, Invisicare. The comprehensive patent protects Invisicare in three main areas: its composition, its method of combining polymers to make the Invisicare complex and the skin / medical conditions Invisicare is used for.

 

Skinvisible was granted a Sunscreen patent from the United States Patent Office March of 2012. This patent entitled “Sunscreen Composition With Enhanced UVA Absorber Stability and Methods”, has a Patent Number 8128913. Skinvisible has developed three sunscreen formulations using avobenzone; SPF 15, 30 and 50. Skinvisible’s new formulation with avobenzone has eight hours of photostability, a unique advantage in the marketplace. It also allows our sunscreens to be labeled “broad spectrum” as defined by the new FDA sunscreen guidelines in effect this year. This patent further strengthens the company’s existing intellectual property assets. The patent provides protection for its sunscreen formulation in the United States until November 2029.

 

Additionally, we have numerous  patents pending internationally on various formulations and unique mechanisms in topical delivery. All patents with Invisicare are owned by Skinvisible.

 

Patent protection is important to our company. Pharmaceutical companies are pursuing new or improved revenue streams along with protecting their own intellectual properties. Invisicare allows companies to sell a patent-protected product that has been revitalized with new benefits, giving them a new story to help combat generic competitors. A prescription dermatology product can generate sales of $100 plus million per year; some even $200 plus million – and that is why we believe the investment into a license with an Invisicare formulation is a very viable option for these companies.

 

We continue to submit for patent protection worldwide for products formulated with Invisicare.

 

Status of Research and Development for New Applications

 

We believe that the enhancement and extension of our existing products and the development of new product categories have contributed significantly to our growth to date and are necessary for our continued growth. Our management evaluates new ideas and seeks to develop new products and improvements to existing products to satisfy industry requirements and changing consumer preferences. We seek to identify trends in consumer preferences and to generate new product ideas. Specific to the objective of generating new products, we are continuing our research and development toward developing additional applications with Invisicare.

 

In the first quarter of 2011, we entered into a feasibility agreement with Novartis Pharma AG of Basel, Switzerland. Under the agreement, we will assess the technical feasibility of a topical formulation with an undisclosed compound utilizing our proprietary Invisicare delivery system. This formulation, if proven successful, would improve Invisicare’s main benefits by providing controlled release of the proprietary active ingredient. The agreement includes the option for the two companies to enter into a future exclusive licensing agreement which would include a licensing fee and royalties based on sales. The second phase of this project’s development contract was extended and will conclude in the 2nd quarter of 2012.

 

Orphan Drug Applications

 

In March 2011, we submitted our product for Netherton Syndrome to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to obtain orphan drug status. This was followed with Skinvisible’s Orphan Drug application in Europe in February of 2012. In the US, we continue to submit additional data and undergo further review. Netherton Syndrome is a genetic disease that is characterized by excessively scaly, circular red skin, brittle hair and for some also atopic dermatitis. Once approved, we will seek an exclusive pharmaceutical partner to expedite the approval and commercialization of this formulation worldwide. There are incentives provided for the development of orphan drugs they include eligibility for seven years of market exclusively for the product (USA) and ten years in Europe, as well as a waiver of fees, tax incentives and a potential for grants to fund clinical trials. Some orphan drugs also receive an expedited review if the disease is severe or life-threatening.

9
Table of Contents

Competition

 

While there is significant competition in the skincare products industry, our primary business objective is to license our technology and formulated products to manufacturers of Rx and OTC skincare products. Market research undertaken to date has indicated that, at present, there is reasonably limited competition for our polymer-based delivery systems and related technologies such as delivery vehicles and technologies that offer the same performance capabilities for topically administered products. Some delivery technology companies offer a new way to bring active ingredients to the skin topically such as foam technology. This is usually where it stops as Invisicare not only offers this delivery but also offers a sustained or controlled release of the active ingredient from the emulsion – a real plus if the active ingredient causes skin irritation.

 

Trademarks

 

In January 2002, we received trademark approval in the United States for the name "Invisicare" to identify our family of polymer delivery systems. We have filed this trade name with the Cosmetic, Fragrance and Toiletries Association ("CFTA") as an ingredient for use in skincare and cosmetic formulations.

 

We have also applied and received trademark approval for the corporate name & logo “Skinvisible”.

 

We are seeking to extend the protection of our trademarks in additional countries where we currently conduct business and those additional countries where we intend to conduct business.

 

In 2011, we received trademark protection for “DermSafe” both in the United States and Canada.

 

Employees

 

We currently have four employees, including our sole officer Terry Howlett. All our employees with the exception of our bookkeeper are full-time employees.

 

Research and Development Expenditures

 

We incurred research and development expenditures of $6,358 in the fiscal year ended December 31, 2011, and $7,312 in the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010.

 

Government Regulation

 

We are not subject to any significant or material federal or state government regulation in connection with the research and development and licensing of our innovative topical polymer-based delivery systems and technologies.

 

With respect to our products under development, our licensing agreements require the licensee to seek all required approvals for marketing, distribution, and sale in the jurisdictions for which it is desired to make the product available should we succeed in developing a successful product.

 

We are not subject to any significant or material environmental regulation in the normal operation of our business.

 

Subsidiaries

 

We conduct our operations through our wholly-owned subsidiary, Skinvisible Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

10
Table of Contents

Item 2. Properties

 

Currently, we do not own any real estate. We are leasing our executive offices and research facility. We are located at 6320 South Sandhill Road, Suite 10, Las Vegas, Nevada 89120.

 

Skinvisible Pharmaceuticals, Inc., our wholly-owned subsidiary, owns the manufacturing and laboratory equipment at this location.

 

Item 3. Legal Proceedings

 

On September 30, 2011, we filed a complaint in the United States District Court for the District of Nevada (the “Court”), against Sunless Beauty, Ltd., Angie Trelstad, TMTA, LLC, and Norvell Skin Solutions, LLC (collectively, the “Defendants”), alleging patent infringement on the Company’s patents: U.S. Patent 6,756,059 B2, 7,674,471 B2, and 6,582,683 B2 (the “Patents”), trademark infringement, misappropriation of trade secrets, and breach of the License Agreement we entered into October 31, 2007 with Sunless Beauty, Ltd. We are seeking, among other things, the following relief from the Court against the Defendants:

 

For an order declaring that Defendants have infringed one or more claims of the Patents;

 

- For an order declaring that Defendants have infringed on the Company’s trademarks;

- For an order declaring that Defendants have willfully misappropriated the Company’s trade secrets;

- A preliminary and permanent injunction against Defendants prohibiting each of them from further infringement of the Patents and the Company’s trademarks and trade secrets;

- Injunctive relief is being sought due to the continued infringement by Norvell;

- For an order declaring that Sunless Beauty Ltd. and Angie Trelstad have breached the License Agreement;

- An award of damages the Company has suffered by reason of the allegations charged in the complaint;

- An award to the Company of its costs and attorneys’ fees;

- Such other relief as the Court may deem just and proper.

 

We are currently seeking default judgments against certain defendants in the case. We have filed a preliminary injunction against Norvell Skin Solutions, LLC.

 

We are not aware of any pending legal proceeding to which any of our officers, directors, or any beneficial holders of 5% or more of our voting securities are adverse to us or have a material interest adverse to us.

 

Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures

 

Not Applicable

 

PART II

 

Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity and Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

 

Market Information

 

Our common stock is quoted under the symbol “SKVI” on the OTCBB operated by the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, Inc. (“FINRA”) and the OTCQB operated by OTC Markets Group, Inc.  Few market makers continue to participate in the OTCBB system because of high fees charged by FINRA.  Consequently, market makers that once quoted our shares on the OTCBB system may no longer be posting a quotation for our shares. As of the date of this report, however, our shares are quoted by several market makers on the OTCQB. The criteria for listing on either the OTCBB or OTCQB are similar and include that we remain current in our SEC reporting. Our reporting is presently current and, since inception, we have filed our SEC reports on time.

11
Table of Contents

Only a limited market exists for our securities. There is no assurance that a regular trading market will develop, or if developed, that it will be sustained. Therefore, a shareholder may be unable to resell his securities in our company.

 

The following table sets forth the range of high and low bid quotations for our common stock for each of the periods indicated as reported by the OTCQB. These quotations reflect inter-dealer prices, without retail mark-up, mark-down or commission and may not necessarily represent actual transactions.

 

Fiscal Year Ending December 31, 2011
Quarter Ended  High $  Low $
 December 31, 2011    0.06    0.04 
 September 30, 2011    0.075    0.043 
 June 30, 2011    0.075    0.04 
 March 31, 2011    0.095    0.04 

 

Fiscal Year Ending December 31, 2010
Quarter Ended  High $  Low $
 December 31, 2010    0.06    0.04 
 September 30, 2010    0.08    0.04 
 June 30, 2010    0.10    0.06 
 March 31, 2010    0.16    0.08 

 

On April 11, 2012, the last sales price per share of our common stock on the OTCQB was $0.05.

 

Penny Stock

 

The SEC has adopted rules that regulate broker-dealer practices in connection with transactions in penny stocks. Penny stocks are generally equity securities with a market price of less than $5.00, other than securities registered on certain national securities exchanges or quoted on the NASDAQ system, provided that current price and volume information with respect to transactions in such securities is provided by the exchange or system. The penny stock rules require a broker-dealer, prior to a transaction in a penny stock, to deliver a standardized risk disclosure document prepared by the SEC, that: (a) contains a description of the nature and level of risk in the market for penny stocks in both public offerings and secondary trading; (b) contains a description of the broker’s or dealer’s duties to the customer and of the rights and remedies available to the customer with respect to a violation of such duties or other requirements of the securities laws; (c) contains a brief, clear, narrative description of a dealer market, including bid and ask prices for penny stocks and the significance of the spread between the bid and ask price; (d) contains a toll-free telephone number for inquiries on disciplinary actions; (e) defines significant terms in the disclosure document or in the conduct of trading in penny stocks; and (f) contains such other information and is in such form, including language, type size and format, as the SEC shall require by rule or regulation.

12
Table of Contents

The broker-dealer also must provide, prior to effecting any transaction in a penny stock, the customer with (a) bid and offer quotations for the penny stock; (b) the compensation of the broker-dealer and its salesperson in the transaction; (c) the number of shares to which such bid and ask prices apply, or other comparable information relating to the depth and liquidity of the market for such stock; and (d) a monthly account statement showing the market value of each penny stock held in the customer’s account.

 

In addition, the penny stock rules require that prior to a transaction in a penny stock not otherwise exempt from those rules, the broker-dealer must make a special written determination that the penny stock is a suitable investment for the purchaser and receive the purchaser’s written acknowledgment of the receipt of a risk disclosure statement, a written agreement as to transactions involving penny stocks, and a signed and dated copy of a written suitability statement.

 

These disclosure requirements may have the effect of reducing the trading activity for our common stock. Therefore, stockholders may have difficulty selling our securities.

 

Holders of Our Common Stock

 

As of December 31, 2011, we had 106,592,159 shares of our common stock issued and outstanding, held by 183 shareholders of record, other than those held in street name.

 

Dividends

 

There are no restrictions in our articles of incorporation or bylaws that prevent us from declaring dividends. The Nevada Revised Statutes, however, do prohibit us from declaring dividends where after giving effect to the distribution of the dividend:

 

1. we would not be able to pay our debts as they become due in the usual course of business, or;
2. our total assets would be less than the sum of our total liabilities plus the amount that would be needed to satisfy the rights of shareholders who have preferential rights superior to those receiving the distribution.

 

We have not declared any dividends and we do not plan to declare any dividends in the foreseeable future.

 

Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities

 

The information set forth below relates to our issuances of securities without registration under the Securities Act of 1933 during the reporting period which were not previously included in a Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q or Current Report on Form 8-K.

 

During the three months ended December 31, 2011, we issued 900,000 shares of our common stock to subscribers for an aggregate of $45,000 in proceeds. We also issued two year warrants to the subscribers to purchase an aggregate amount of 450,000 shares of common shares at a strike price of $0.08 per share.

 

During the three months ended December 31, 2011, we issued 340,000 restricted shares of our common stock as a result of entering into debt conversion agreements with lenders to convert total principal balances and interest of $18,900 into equity.

13
Table of Contents

During the three months ended December 31, 2011, we issued 510,400 shares of our common stock as a result of entering into a loan conversion agreement with a lender to convert a total principal balance and interest of $20,415 into equity. We also issued a two year warrant to the lender to purchase an aggregate amount of 255,200 shares of common shares at a strike price of $0.06 per share.

 

These securities were issued pursuant to Section 4(2) of the Securities Act and/or Rule 506 promulgated thereunder. The holders represented their intention to acquire the securities for investment only and not with a view towards distribution. The investors were given adequate information about us to make an informed investment decision. We did not engage in any general solicitation or advertising. We directed our transfer agent to issue the stock certificates with the appropriate restrictive legend affixed to the restricted stock.

 

Securities Authorized for Issuance under Equity Compensation Plans

 

The following table provides information about our compensation plans under which shares of common stock may be issued upon the exercise of options as of December 31, 2011.

 

In July 2006, we adopted the 2006 Skinvisible, Inc. Stock Option Plan, which provides for the grant of incentive stock options, non-qualified stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock, performance shares and performance units, and stock awards our officers, directors or employees of, as well as advisers and consultants. This plan was confirmed by our stockholders on August 7, 2006 at the annual shareholders meeting.

 

Under the 2006 Skinvisible, Inc. Stock Option Plan, we reserved 10,000,000 shares of common stock for the granting of options and rights.

 

Equity Compensation Plans as of December 31, 2011



A B C
Plan Category Number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options, warrants and rights Weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options,
warrants and right
Number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans (excluding securities reflected in column (A))

Equity compensation plans

approved by security

holders

7,350,000 $0.05 2,650,000

Equity compensation plans

not approved by security

holders

8,392,451 $0.07 -
Total 15,742,451 2,650,000
14
Table of Contents

Item 6. Selected Financial Data

 

A smaller reporting company is not required to provide the information required by this Item.

 

Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

 

Forward-Looking Statements

 

Certain statements, other than purely historical information, including estimates, projections, statements relating to our business plans, objectives, and expected operating results, and the assumptions upon which those statements are based, are “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. These forward-looking statements generally are identified by the words “believes,” “project,” “expects,” “anticipates,” “estimates,” “intends,” “strategy,” “plan,” “may,” “will,” “would,” “will be,” “will continue,” “will likely result,” and similar expressions. We intend such forward-looking statements to be covered by the safe-harbor provisions for forward-looking statements contained in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, and are including this statement for purposes of complying with those safe-harbor provisions. Forward-looking statements are based on current expectations and assumptions that are subject to risks and uncertainties which may cause actual results to differ materially from the forward-looking statements. Our ability to predict results or the actual effect of future plans or strategies is inherently uncertain. Factors which could have a material adverse affect on our operations and future prospects on a consolidated basis include, but are not limited to: changes in economic conditions, legislative/regulatory changes, availability of capital, interest rates, competition, and generally accepted accounting principles. These risks and uncertainties should also be considered in evaluating forward-looking statements and undue reliance should not be placed on such statements. We undertake no obligation to update or revise publicly any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. Further information concerning our business, including additional factors that could materially affect our financial results, is included herein and in our other filings with the SEC.

 

Results  of Operations for the Years Ended December 31, 2011 and 2010

 

Revenues

 

Our total revenue reported for the year ended December 31, 2011 was $180,185, a decrease from $229,175 for the year ended December 31, 2010. The decrease in revenues for the year ended December 31, 2011 from the prior year is primarily attributable to decreased sales of polymers to our licensees.

 

Cost of Revenues

 

Our cost of revenues for the year ended December 31, 2011 decreased to $1,680 from the prior year when cost of revenues was $19,461. The decrease in our cost of revenues for the year ended December 31, 2011 from the prior year is attributable to fewer costs associated with product materials.

 

Gross Profit

 

Gross profit for the year ended December 31, 2011 was $178,505, or approximately 99% of sales. Gross profit for the year ended December 31, 2010 was $209,714, or approximately 91% of sales.

15
Table of Contents

Operating Expenses

 

Operating expenses increased to $1,406,733 for the year ended December 31, 2011 from $1,009,955 for the year ended December 31, 2010. Our operating expenses for the year ended December 31, 2011 consisted mainly of salaries and wages of $31,305, accrued salaries and wages of $365,404, rent of $56,177, accounting and audit expenses of $46,120, depreciation and amortization expenses of $56,313, and consulting expenses of $58,448. In comparison, our operating expenses for the year ended December 31, 2010 consisted mainly of salaries and wages of $222,549, accrued salaries and wages of $219,509, rent of $61,816, royalties paid of $72,000, accounting and audit expenses of $43,320, depreciation and amortization expenses of $41,986, and consulting expenses of $36,822.

 

Other Expenses

 

We paid less in interest expenses for the year ended December 31, 2011 than in the prior year ended 2010,which was the primary basis for total other expenses of $132,257 for the year ended December 31, 2011 as compared with $272,796 for the prior year.

 

Net Loss

 

Net loss for the year ended December 31, 2011 was $1,360,485 compared to net loss of $1,073,038 for the year ended December 31, 2010.

 

Liquidity  and Capital Resources

 

As of December 31, 2011, we had total current assets of $27,034 and total assets in the amount of $296,917. Our total current liabilities as of December 31, 2011 were $1,488,110. We had a working capital deficit of $1,461,076 as of December 31, 2011.

 

Operating activities used $192,460 in cash for year ended December 31, 2011. Our net loss of $1,360,485 was the main component of our negative operating cash flow, offset mainly by amortization of debt discount of $584,559, accrued expenses converted to notes of $442,978 and stock based compensation of $155,100.

 

Cash flows used by investing activities during the year ended December 31, 2011 was $87,404 as a result of the purchase of fixed and intangible assets.

 

Cash flows provided by financing activities during year ended December 31, 2011 amounted to $278,601 and consisted primarily of $223,001 from the issuance of stock and $25,200 as proceeds from loans.

 

Based upon our current financial condition, we do not have sufficient cash to operate our business at the current level for the next twelve months. We intend to fund operations through increased sales and debt and/or equity financing arrangements, which may be insufficient to fund expenditures or other cash requirements. We plan to seek additional financing in a private equity offering to secure funding for operations. There can be no assurance that we will be successful in raising additional funding. If we are not able to secure additional funding, the implementation of our business plan will be impaired. There can be no assurance that such additional financing will be available to us on acceptable terms or at all.

 

Off Balance Sheet Arrangements

 

As of December 31, 2011, there were no off balance sheet arrangements.

16
Table of Contents

Critical Accounting Policies

 

In December 2001, the SEC requested that all registrants list their most “critical accounting polices” in the Management Discussion and Analysis. The SEC indicated that a “critical accounting policy” is one which is both important to the portrayal of a company’s financial condition and results, and requires management’s most difficult, subjective or complex judgments, often as a result of the need to make estimates about the effect of matters that are inherently uncertain.

 

Going concern – The accompanying financial statements have been prepared on a going concern basis, which contemplates the realization of assets and the satisfaction of liabilities in the normal course of business. The Company has incurred cumulative net losses of  $21,118,943 since its inception and requires capital for its contemplated operational and marketing activities to take place. The Company’s ability to raise additional capital through the future issuances of common stock is unknown. The obtainment of additional financing, the successful development of the Company’s contemplated plan of operations, and its transition, ultimately, to the attainment of profitable operations are necessary for the Company to continue operations. The ability to successfully resolve these factors raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. The consolidated financial statements of the Company do not include any adjustments that may result from the outcome of these aforementioned uncertainties.

 

Product sales – Revenues from the sale of products are recognized when title to the products are transferred to the customer and only when no further contingencies or material performance obligations are warranted, and thereby have earned the right to receive reasonably assured payments for products sold and delivered.

 

Royalty sales – The Company also recognizes royalty revenue from licensing its patent and trademarks, only when earned, with no further contingencies or material performance obligations are warranted, and thereby have earned the right to receive and retain reasonably assured payments.

 

Distribution and license rights sales – The Company also recognizes revenue from distribution and license rights only when earned, with no further contingencies or material performance obligations are warranted, and thereby have earned the right to receive and retain reasonably assured payments.

 

Costs of Revenue – Cost of revenue includes raw materials, component parts, and shipping supplies. Shipping and handling costs is not a significant portion of the cost of revenue.

 

Accounts Receivable – Accounts receivable is comprised of uncollateralized customer obligations due under normal trade terms requiring payment within 30 days from the invoice date. The carrying amount of accounts receivable is reviewed periodically for collectability. If management determines that collection is unlikely, an allowance that reflects management’s best estimate of the amounts that will not be collected is recorded. Management reviews each accounts receivable balance that exceeds 30 days from the invoice date and, based on an assessment of creditworthiness, estimates the portion, if any, of the balance that will not be collected. As of December 31, 2010, the Company had not recorded a reserve for doubtful accounts.

 

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements

 

In January 2010, the FASB (Financial Accounting Standards Board) issued Accounting Standards Update 2010-07 (ASU 2010-07), Not-for-Profit Entities (Topic 958): Not-for-Profit Entities: Mergers and Acquisitions. This amendment to Topic 958 has occurred as a result of the issuance of FAS 164. The Company does not expect the provisions of ASU 2010-07 to have a material effect on the financial position, results of operations or cash flows of the Company.

17
Table of Contents

In February 2010, the FASB (Financial Accounting Standards Board) issued Accounting Standards Update 2010-08 (ASU 2010-08), Technical Corrections to Various Topics. This amendment eliminated inconsistencies and outdated provisions and provided the needed clarifications to various topics within Topic 815. The amendments are effective for the first reporting period (including interim periods) beginning after issuance (February 2, 2010), except for certain amendments. The amendments to the guidance on accounting for income taxes in reorganization (Subtopic 852-740) should be applied to reorganizations for which the date of the reorganization is on or after the beginning of the first annual reporting period beginning on or after December 15, 2008. For those reorganizations reflected in interim financial statements issued before the amendments in this Update are effective, retrospective application is required. The clarifications of the guidance on the embedded derivates and hedging (Subtopic 815-15) are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2009, and should be applied to existing contracts (hybrid instruments) containing embedded derivative features at the date of adoption. The Company does not expect the provisions of ASU 2010-08 to have a material effect on the financial position, results of operations or cash flows of the Company.

 

In February 2010, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update 2010-09 (ASU 2010-09), Subsequent Events (Topic 855), amending guidance on subsequent events to alleviate potential conflicts between FASB guidance and SEC requirements. Under this amended guidance, SEC filers are no longer required to disclose the date through which subsequent events have been evaluated in originally issued and revised financial statements. This guidance was effective immediately and we adopted these new requirements for the period ended May 31, 2010. The adoption of this guidance did not have a material impact on our financial statements.

 

In April 2010, the FASB issued ASU No. 2010-17, “Revenue Recognition – Milestone Method (Topic 605): Milestone Method of Revenue Recognition” (codified within ASC 605 – Revenue Recognition). ASU 2010-17 provides guidance on defining a milestone and determining when it may be appropriate to apply the milestone method of revenue recognition for research or development transactions. ASU 2010-17 is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after June 15, 2010. The adoption of ASU 2010-17 is not expected to have any material impact on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

 

In May 2010, the FASB (Financial Accounting Standards Board) issued Accounting Standards Update 2010-19 (ASU 2010-19), Foreign Currency (Topic 830): Foreign Currency Issues: Multiple Foreign Currency Exchange Rates. The amendments in this Update are effective as of the announcement date of March 18, 2010. The Company does not expect the provisions of ASU 2010-19 to have a material effect on the Company’s financial position, results of operations or cash flows of the Company.

 

Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

 

A smaller reporting company is not required to provide the information required by this Item.

 

Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

 

Index to Financial Statements Required by Article 8 of Regulation S-X:

 

Audited Financial Statements:

 

F-1 Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
F-2 Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2011 and 2010
F-3 Consolidated Statements of Operations for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010
F-4 Consolidated Statement of Stockholders’ Deficit for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010
F-5 Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010
F-6 Notes to Financial Statements

 

18
Table of Contents

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

 

To the Board of Directors

Skinvisible, Inc.

Las Vegas, Nevada

 

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of Skinvisible, Inc. as of December 31, 2011 and 2010, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders' deficit, and cash flows for the years then ended. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audit.

 

We conducted our audit in accordance with standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are tree of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall consolidated financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

 

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Skinvisible, Inc. as of December 31, 2011 and 2010, and the consolidated results of its operations and cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States.

 

The accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note I to the financial statements, the Company has suffered recurring losses from operations, which raise substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern. Management's plans regarding those matters also are described in Note I. Absent the successful completion of one of these alternatives, the Company's operating results will increasingly become uncertain. The financial statements do not contain any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

 

Sarna & Company

Certified Public Accountants

April 12, 2012

Thousand Oaks, California

 

F-1
Table of Contents

SKINVISIBLE, INC.

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

  

   December 31, 2011  December 31, 2010
   (Audited)  (Audited)
Current assets          
Cash  $1,218   $2,481 
Accounts receivable   1,105    —   
Inventory   14,953    16,595 
Due from related party   1,145    1,145 
Prepaid expense and other current assets   8,613    14,003 
Total current assets   27,034    34,224 
           
Fixed assets, net of accumulated depreciation of $330,002 and  $328,369, respectively   5,717    7,349 
Intangible and other assets          
Patents and trademarks, net of accumulated amortization of $162,621 and $107,941, respectively   264,166    231,441 
           
Total assets  $296,917   $273,014 
           
 LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT          
           
Current liabilities          
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities  $623,972   $638,717 
Accrued interest payable   —      5,150 
Loans from related party   12,400    —   
Loans payable   27,661    —   
Convertible notes payable, net of unamortized debt discount of $-0- and $3,477, respectively   62,475    108,965 
Convertible notes payable related party, net of unamortized discount of $698,845 and $538,295, respectively   531,810    249,383 
Unearned revenue   229,792    302,815 
Total current liabilities   1,488,110    1,305,030 
           
Total liabilities   1,488,110    1,305,030 
           
Stockholders' deficit          
Common stock; $0.001 par value; 200,000,000 shares authorized 106,592,159 and 97,518,259 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively   106,594    97,520 
Additional paid-in capital   19,821,156    18,628,922 
Accumulated deficit   (21,118,943)   (19,758,458)
Total stockholders' deficit   (1,191,193)   (1,032,016)
           
Total liabilities and stockholders' deficit  $296,917   $273,014 

 

See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

F-2
Table of Contents

SKINVISIBLE, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

 

Year ended ended 
December 31, 2011  December 31, 2010 
  (Audited)   (Audited) 
Revenues $180,185   $229,175 
Cost of revenues  1,680    19,461 
Gross profit  178,505    209,714 
Operating expenses         
Depreciation and amortization  56,313    41,936 
Selling general and administrative  1,350,420    968,019 
Total operating expenses  1,406,733    1,009,955 
Loss from operations  (1,228,228)   (800,242)
Other (expense)         
Interest expense  (127,152)   (272,796)
Loss on conversion of debt  (5,105)   —   
Total other expense  (132,257)   (272,796)
Provision for income taxes  —      —   
Net loss $(1,360,485)  $(1,073,038)
Basic loss per common share $(0.01)  $(0.01)
Basic weighted average common shares outstanding  101,370,461    89,879,372 

 

See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

F-3
Table of Contents

SKINVISIBLE, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT

 

             Total
 Common Stock    Additional    Accumulated     Stockholders' 
 Shares   Amount    Paid-in Capital   Deficit  Deficit 
Balance, December 31, 2009  94,943,509   $94,945   $17,740,914   $(18,685,421)  $(849,562)
Issuance of stock for cash  500,000    500    24,500    —      25,000 
Issuance of stock for services  416,750    417    31,866    —      32,283 
Issuance of stock for conversion of debts  1,175,000    1,175    92,825    —      94,000 
Issuance of employee stock options  —      —      91,460    —      91,460 
Issuance of stock options for services  483,000   483   63,410   —     63,893 
Issuance of warrants for services  —      —      35,763    —      35,763 
   —      —      548,184    —      548,184 
Net loss  —      —      —      (1,073,037)   (1,073,037)
Balance, December 31, 2010 (audited)  97,518,259   $97,520   $18,628,922   $(19,758,458)  $(1,032,016)
Issuance of stock for cash  4,187,500    4,188    203,813    —      208,001 
Issuance of stock for conversion of debts  1,912,400    1,912    79,663    —      81,575 
Issuance of stock for services  2,724,000   2,724   152,376   —     155,100 
Issuance of stock upon exercise of warrants in lieu of debt  250,000    250    14,750    —      15,000 
Financing costs related to convertible notes payable  —      —      741,632    —      741,632 
Net loss  —      —      —      (1,360,485)   (1,360,485)
Balance, December 31, 2011 (audited)  106,592,159   $106,594   $19,821,156   $(21,118,943)  $(1,191,193)

 

See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

F-4
Table of Contents

SKINVISIBLE, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

 

  For the Year Ended 
  December 31, 2011  December 31, 2010
  (Audited)  (Audited)
      
Cash flows from operating activities:         
Net loss $(1,360,485)  $(1,073,037)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used by operating activities:         
Depreciation and amortization  56,313    41,936 
Stock based compensation  155,100    126,220 
Amortization of debt discount  584,559    191,180 
Interest expense paid with common stock  —      548,183 
Loss on conversion of debt  5,105    —   
Accrued expenses converted to notes  442,978    —   
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:         
Decrease in inventory  1,642    1,034 
Increase in accounts receivable  (1,105)   468 
Increase in prepaid expenses and other current assets  5,390    (9,791)
Decrease in related party receivable  —      3,060 
Decrease in prepaid royalty fees  —      50,000 
Decrease in accounts payable and accrued liabilities  (14,749)   (102,997)
Increase (decrease) in accrued interest  5,815    (11,949)
Increase (decrease) in unearned revenue  (73,023)   253,023 
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities  (192,460)   17,330 
          
Cash flows from investing activities:         
          
Purchase of fixed assets and intangible assets  (87,404)   (138,702)
Net cash used in investing activities  (87,404)   (138,702)
          
Cash flows from financing activities:         
Proceeds from issuance of stock  223,001    25,000 
Proceeds from, net of payments to, related parties for loans  12,400    —   
Proceeds from convertible notes payable  18,000    72,985 
Payments on convertible notes payable       —   
Proceeds from loans  25,200    —   
Net cash provided by financing activities  278,601    97,985 
          
Net change in cash  (1,263)   (23,387)
          
Cash, beginning of period  2,481    25,868 
          
Cash, end of period $1,218   $2,481 
          
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION:         
Non-cash investing and financing activities:         
Common stock issued on conversion of debts $81,575   $—   
Beneficial conversion feature $741,632   $—   

 

See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

F-5
Table of Contents

SKINVISIBLE, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(AUDITED)

 

1. DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS, HISTORY AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT POLICIES

 

Description of business – Skinvisible, Inc., (referred to as the “Company”) is focused on the development and manufacture of innovative topical, transdermal and mucosal polymer-based delivery system technologies and formulations incorporating its patent-pending formula/process for combining hydrophilic and hydrophobic polymer emulsions. The technologies and formulations have broad industry applications within the pharmaceutical, over-the-counter, personal skincare and cosmetic arenas. Additionally, the Company’s non-dermatological formulations, offer solutions for a broad spectrum of markets women’s health, pain management, and others. The Company maintains executive and sales offices in Las Vegas, Nevada.

 

History – Skinvisible, Inc. (referred to as the “Company”) was incorporated in Nevada on March 6, 1998 under the name of Microbial Solutions, Inc. The Company underwent a name change on February 26, 1999, when it changed its name to Skinvisible, Inc. The Company’s subsidiary’s name of Manloe Labs, Inc. was also changed to Skinvisible Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

 

Skinvisible, Inc. together with its subsidiary shall herein be collectively referred to as the “Company”.

 

Going concern – The accompanying financial statements have been prepared on a going concern basis, which contemplates the realization of assets and the satisfaction of liabilities in the normal course of business. The Company has incurred cumulative net losses of $21,118,943 since its inception and requires capital for its contemplated operational and marketing activities to take place. The Company’s ability to raise additional capital through the future issuances of common stock is unknown. The obtainment of additional financing, the successful development of the Company’s contemplated plan of operations, and its transition, ultimately, to the attainment of profitable operations are necessary for the Company to continue operations. The ability to successfully resolve these factors raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. The consolidated financial statements of the Company do not include any adjustments that may result from the outcome of these aforementioned uncertainties.

 

Principles of consolidation – The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its subsidiary. All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated.

 

Use of estimates – The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

 

Revenue recognition

Product sales – Revenues from the sale of products (Invisicare® polymers) are recognized when title to the products are transferred to the customer and only when no further contingencies or material performance obligations are warranted, and thereby have earned the right to receive reasonably assured payments for products sold and delivered.

 

Royalty sales – The Company also recognizes royalty revenue from licensing its patented product formulations only when earned, with no further contingencies or material performance obligations are warranted, and thereby have earned the right to receive and retain reasonably assured payments.

Distribution and license rights sales – The Company also recognizes revenue from distribution and license rights only when earned (and are amortized over a five year period), with no further contingencies or material performance obligations are warranted, and thereby have earned the right to receive and retain reasonably assured payments.

Costs of Revenue – Cost of revenue includes raw materials, component parts, and shipping supplies. Shipping and handling costs is not a significant portion of the cost of revenue.

F-6
Table of Contents

SKINVISIBLE, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(AUDITED)

 

1. DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS, HISTORY AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT POLICIES - (continued)

 

Accounts Receivable Accounts receivable is comprised of uncollateralized customer obligations due under normal trade terms requiring payment within 30 days from the invoice date. The carrying amount of accounts receivable is reviewed periodically for collectability. If management determines that collection is unlikely, an allowance that reflects management’s best estimate of the amounts that will not be collected is recorded. Management reviews each accounts receivable balance that exceeds 30 days from the invoice date and, based on an assessment of creditworthiness, estimates the portion, if any, of the balance that will not be collected. As of September 30, 2011, the Company had not recorded a reserve for doubtful accounts.

 

Inventory – Substantially all inventory consists of finished goods and are valued based upon first-in first-out ("FIFO") cost, not in excess of market. The determination of whether the carrying amount of inventory requires a write-down is based on an evaluation of inventory.

 

Goodwill and intangible assets – The Company follows Financial Accounting Standard Board’s (FASB) Codification Topic 350-10 (“ASC 350-10”), “Intangibles – Goodwill and Other”. According to this statement, goodwill and intangible assets with indefinite lives are no longer subject to amortization, but rather an annual assessment of impairment by applying a fair-value based test. Fair value for goodwill is based on discounted cash flows, market multiples and/or appraised values as appropriate. Under ASC 350-10, the carrying value of assets are calculated at the lowest level for which there are identifiable cash flows.

 

ASC 350-10 requires the Company to compare the fair value of the reporting unit to its carrying amount on an annual basis to determine if there is potential impairment. If the fair value of the reporting unit is less than its carrying value, an impairment loss is recorded to the extent that the fair value of the goodwill within the reporting unit is less than its carrying value. During 2010, the Company completed an impairment review and did not recognize any impairment of goodwill and other intangible assets already included in the financial statements. The Company expects to receive future benefits from previously acquired goodwill over an indefinite period of time. Accordingly, beginning January 1, 2002, the Company has foregone all related amortization expense. Prior to January 1, 2002, the Company amortized goodwill over an estimated useful life ranging from 3 to 15 years using the straight-line method.

 

Income taxes – The Company accounts for its income taxes in accordance with FASB Codification Topic ASC 740-10, “Income Taxes”, which requires recognition of deferred tax assets and liabilities for future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases and tax credit carry-forwards. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date.

 

Stock-based compensation – The Company follows the guidelines in FASB Codification Topic ASC 718-10 “Compensation-Stock Compensation”, which requires the measurement and recognition of compensation expense for all share-based payment awards made to employees and directors including employee stock options and employee stock purchases related to a Employee Stock Purchase Plan based on the estimated fair values.

 

Stock based compensation expense recognized under ASC 718-10 for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010 totaled $155,100 and $126,220, respectively.

 

Earnings (loss) per share – The Company reports earnings (loss) per share in accordance with FASB Codification Topic ASC 260-10 “Earnings Per Share”, Basic earnings (loss) per share is computed by dividing income (loss) available to common shareholders by the weighted average number of common shares available. Diluted earnings (loss) per share is computed similar to basic earnings (loss) per share except that the denominator is increased to include the number of additional common shares that would have been outstanding if the potential common shares had been issued and if the additional common shares were dilutive. Diluted earnings (loss) per share has not been presented since the effect of the assumed exercise of options and warrants to purchase common shares (common stock equivalents) would have an anti-dilutive effect.

 

F-7
Table of Contents

SKINVISIBLE, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(AUDITED)

 

2. FIXED ASSETS

 

Fixed assets consist of the following as of December 31, 2011:

 

   2011  2010
Machinery and equipment  $55,463    55,463 
Furniture and fixtures   113,635    113,635 
Computers, equipment and software   38,105    38,105 
Leasehold improvements   12,569    12,596 
Lab equipment   115,946    115,946 
Total   335,718    335,718 
Less: accumulated depreciation   330,001    328,369 
Fixed assets, net of accumulated depreciation  $5,717    7,349 

 

Depreciation expense for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010 was $1,633 and $2,167, respectively.

 

3.    INTANGIBLE AND OTHER ASSETS

 

Patents and trademarks are capitalized at its historical cost and are amortized over their useful lives. As of December 31, 2011, patents and trademarks total $264,166, net of $162,621 of accumulated amortization. Amortization expense for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010 was $54,680 and $39,769, respectively.

 

License and distributor rights (“agreement”) was acquired by the Company in January 1999 and provides exclusive use distribution of polymers and polymer based products. The Company has a non-expiring term on the license and distribution rights. Accordingly, the Company annually assesses this license and distribution rights for impairment and has determined that no impairment write-down is considered necessary as of December 31, 2011.

 

4.    UNEARNED REVENUE

 

Unearned revenue totaling $229,792 as of December 31, 2011 relates to a marketing and distribution rights agreement entered into during 2010 for which monies were received and not considered earned. See note 9 “Definitive Agreements”.

 

5. STOCK OPTIONS AND WARRANTS

 

Stock options employees and directors – During the year ended December 31, 2010, the Company granted stock options to employees and directors totaling 1,610,000 shares of its common stock with a weighted average strike price of $0.06. Certain stock options were exercisable upon grant and have a life ranging from 3 months to 5 years. The stock options were valued at $91,460 using the Black-Scholes option pricing model based upon the following assumptions: term of 5 years,  risk free interest rates ranging from 1.25% to 2.19%, a dividend yield of 0% and volatility rates ranging from 131% to 172%.  The Company recorded an expense of $91,460 for the year ended December 31, 2010. There were no stock options issued to employees or directors during the year ended December 30, 2011.

 

Stock options non-employees – During the year ended December 31, 2010, the Company granted stock options for services totaling  450,000 shares of its common stock with a weighted average strike price of $0.06 per share. All stock options were exercisable upon grant. The stock options have been valued at $25,563 using the Black-Scholes option  pricing model based upon the following assumptions: term of 5 years,  risk free interest rates ranging from 1.25% to 3.5%, a dividend yield of 0% and volatility rates ranging from  131% to 172%. There were no non-employee stock options issued during the year ended December 31, 2011.

F-8
Table of Contents

 

SKINVISIBLE, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(AUDITED)

 

5. STOCK OPTIONS AND WARRANTS – (continued)

 

The following is a summary of option activity during the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010.

 

   Number of Shares  Weighted Average
Exercise Price
Balance, December 31, 2010  10,280,000   0.05 
         
Options granted and assumed  —     —   
Options expired  300,000   0.04 
Options canceled  —     —   
Options exercised  —     —   
         
Balance, December 31, 2011  9,980,000   0.05 

 

As of December 31, 2011, 9,980,000 stock options are exercisable.

 

Stock warrants -

 

The following is a summary of warrants activity during the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010.

 

  Number of Shares  Weighted Average
Exercise Price
Balance, December 31, 2010  5,844,347    0.10 
          
Warrants granted and assumed  3,049,950    0.07 
Warrants expired  2,881,846    0.09 
Warrants canceled  —      —   
Warrants exercised  250,000    —   
          
Balance, December 31, 2011  5,762,451    0.10 

 

All warrants outstanding as of December 31, 2011 are exercisable. The warrants issued during 2011 were issued as part of a series of common stock subscriptions for retirement of debts.

 

6.    RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

 

For the years ending December 31, 2011 and 2010, the Company had an unsecured loan payable due to an officer of the Company bearing no interest, due on demand totaling $12,400 and $0, respectively. As of December 31, 2011, all other related party notes have been extinguished or re-negotiated as convertible notes. See note 7.

F-9
Table of Contents

SKINVISIBLE, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(AUDITED)

 

7. CONVERTIBLE NOTES PAYABLE

 

During the year ended December 31, 2011, convertible notes to three individuals were exercised resulting in a removal of $76,055 from Convertible notes. These same notes accrued $6,957 of interest and accounted for $10,871 of the debt discount amortization for the year ended December 31, 2011.

 

On December 31, 2011, the Company re-negotiated accrued salaries and interest for the three employees. Under the terms of the agreements, the notes dated before December 31, 2010 and all salaries not previously converted were converted to promissory notes convertible into common stock with a warrant feature. The promissory notes are unsecured, due five years from issuance, and bear an interest rate of 10%. At the investor’s option until the repayment date, the note may be converted to shares of the Company’s common stock at a fixed price of $0.04 per share along with additional warrants to purchase one share for every two shares issued at the exercise price of $0.06 per share for three years after the conversion date. The Company has determined the value associated with the beneficial conversion feature in connection with the notes to be $538,295 for the notes negotiated on December 31, 2010, $45,557 for the notes negotiated on July 1, 2011 and $676,055 for the notes negotiated December 31, 2011. The aggregate beneficial conversion feature has been accreted and charged to general and administrative expenses as a financing expense in the amount of $584,559 as of December 31, 2011. The beneficial conversion feature is valued under the intrinsic value method.

 

8. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

 

Lease obligations – The Company has operating leases for its offices. Future minimum lease payments under the operating leases for the facilities as of December 31, 2011 are as follows:

 

2012 57,606 
2013 9,601 

 

Rental expense, resulting from operating lease agreements, approximated $56,177 for the year ended December 31, 2011.

 

9.    DEFINITIVE AGREEMENTS

 

During the year ended December 31 2011, the Company amended two license agreements previously entered into with RHEI Pharmaceuticals HK Ltd. previously amended October 12, 2010. The amendment canceled what was previously referred to as the “Three Products Agreement” and modified the “DermSafe Agreement” to include license rights to Europe only. The DermSafe Agreement allows for the exclusive manufacturing, marketing and distribution rights to the Companies patent pending hand sanitizer using Chlorhexidine Gluconate as the active ingredient and trademarked DermSafe for Europe. All amounts previously paid for the license agreement were applied to the “DermSafe Agreement”. On July 26, 2011 the DermSafe Agreement was amended, deferring the remaining $200,000 payment until December 15th, 2011 and all other agreements with RHEI were cancelled, with the option to renegotiate (provided the “Three Products” were not licensed to another company) once the balance payment for DermSafe was received. The cash received has been considered deferred revenue and is amortized over a 5 year period. As of December 31, 2011, the $200,000 had not been received, management expects the payments to be received during the 2nd quarter of 2012. As of December 31, 2011, of the cash received of $300,000, $100,000 had been amortized and recognized as revenue leaving a balance of $200,000 as unearned revenue.

 

F-10
Table of Contents

Item 9. Changes In and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

 

No events occurred requiring disclosure under Item 307 and 308 of Regulation S-K during the fiscal year ending December 31, 2011.

 

Item 9A(T). Controls and Procedures

 

As required by Rule 13a-15 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, we have carried out an evaluation of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this annual report, being December 31, 2011. This evaluation was carried out under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer.

 

Disclosure controls and procedures are controls and other procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our reports filed or submitted under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures include controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our company’s reports filed under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is accumulated and communicated to management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

 

Based upon that evaluation, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, we have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were ineffective as of the end of the period covered by this annual report.

 

Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control over Financing Reporting

 

Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934). Management has assessed the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2011 based on criteria established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. As a result of this assessment, management concluded that, as of December 31, 2011, our internal control over financial reporting was not effective. Our management identified the following material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting, which are indicative of many small companies with small staff: (i) inadequate segregation of duties and effective risk assessment; and (ii) insufficient written policies and procedures for accounting and financial reporting with respect to the requirements and application of both US GAAP and SEC guidelines.

 

We plan to take steps to enhance and improve the design of our internal control over financial reporting. During the period covered by this annual report on Form 10-K, we have not been able to remediate the material weaknesses identified above. To remediate such weaknesses, we hope to implement the following changes during our fiscal year ending December 31, 2011 1: (i) appoint additional qualified personnel to address inadequate segregation of duties and ineffective risk management; and (ii) adopt sufficient written policies and procedures for accounting and financial reporting. The remediation efforts set out in (i) and (ii)_are largely dependent upon our securing additional financing to cover the costs of implementing the changes required. If we are unsuccessful in securing such funds, remediation efforts may be adversely affected in a material manner.

 

This annual report does not include an attestation report of our registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting. Management’s report was not subject to attestation by our registered public accounting firm pursuant to an exemption for non-accelerated filers set forth in Section 989G of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act.

 

Item 9B. Other Information

 

None

19
Table of Contents

PART III

 

Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance

 

The following information sets forth the names, ages, and positions of our current directors and executive officers as of December 31, 2011.

 

Name Age Position(s) and Office(s) Held
Terry Howlett 64 Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, & Director
Greg McCartney 58 Director

 

Set forth below is a brief description of the background and business experience of each of our current executive officers and directors.

 

Mr. Terry H. Howlett, has been our Chief Executive Officer & Director since March 5, 1998. Mr. Howlett has a diversified background in market initialization and development, sales and venture capital financing for emerging growth companies. He has held senior management, marketing and sales positions with various companies, including the Canadian Federation of Independent Business, Family Life Insurance, and Avacare of Canada and founded Presley Laboratories, Inc., which marketed cosmetic and skin, care products on a direct sales basis. For the ten years prior to becoming President of the Company, Mr. Howlett was the President and CEO of Voice-it Solutions, Inc., a publicly traded company on the Vancouver Stock exchange that made voice response software for order entry systems.

 

Mr. Greg McCartney has been a member of our board of directors since January 10, 2005. Mr. McCartney is Managing Director of Taylor, Butterfield & Worth Asset Management Corporation, a management consulting services firm assisting clients in becoming fully reporting public companies. Previously Mr. McCartney was the Chairman of the Board for Genesis Bioventures (formerly BioLabs) and also formerly served as their CEO. Mr. McCartney has over 20 years experience serving as officer and director of both private and public companies in various manufacturing and technology industries. Prior to founding BioLabs in 1997, Mr. McCartney was the founder and director of Aspenwood Holdings Corporation, a business consulting firm specializing in financing, public relations and venture capital in the technology and manufacturing industries. From 1986 to 1995 he was the President of an emerging high technology company and also served as officer and director of other companies. Previously, he was involved with international real estate and land development.

 

Directors

 

Our bylaws authorize no less than one (1) and more than ten (12) directors. We currently have two Directors.

 

Term of Office

 

Our Directors are appointed for a one-year term to hold office until the next annual general meeting of our shareholders or until removed from office in accordance with our bylaws. Our officers are appointed by our board of directors and hold office until removed by the board.

 

Significant Employees

 

Ms. Doreen McMorran, is head of Business Development. Ms. McMorran brings to the Company almost 20 years of experience in the medical and pharmaceutical industry, specifically in the areas of strategic planning, sales and marketing. She has spent the last seven years selling to international dermatology and skincare focused companies like Procter and Gamble, Johnson & Johnson, Stiefel, Galderma, Novartis and Graceway, to name a few. Ms. McMorran, who holds a Bachelor of Commerce (Honors) degree, spent six years in the pharmaceutical industry with Astra Pharma. Additionally she has held senior management level positions with a number of healthcare companies, focusing on business development, sales, marketing and operations.

20
Table of Contents

Dr. James A. Roszell, Ph.D, is a doctoral chemist with over 35 years’ experience in product formulation, experimental design, analysis, and method validation. Since joining Skinvisible in 1998, he has been responsible for research and development of our patented technology, related polymer delivery vehicles, product formulations and compositions. Dr. Roszell is a joint contributor to Skinvisible’s first Patent Number 6.756.059 and responsible for all of our patents in the US and internationally. Prior to joining Skinvisible, he worked as a chemist for Supertech Products, Inc. in Florida where his responsibilities included ensuring compliance with OSHA, EPA and other standards and regulations, maintenance of quality control, research and development for new products. Dr. Roszell’s background includes work in chemical, pharmaceutical, environmental and clinical laboratory arenas. His chemical and scientific expertise makes a significant contribution to our business.

 

Family Relationships

 

There are no family relationships between or among the directors, executive officers or persons nominated or chosen by us to become directors or executive officers.

 

Involvement in Certain Legal Proceedings

 

To the best of our knowledge, during the past ten years, none of the following occurred with respect to a present or former director, executive officer, or employee: (1) any bankruptcy petition filed by or against any business of which such person was a general partner or executive officer either at the time of the bankruptcy or within two years prior to that time; (2) any conviction in a criminal proceeding or being subject to a pending criminal proceeding (excluding traffic violations and other minor offenses); (3) being subject to any order, judgment or decree, not subsequently reversed, suspended or vacated, of any court of competent jurisdiction, permanently or temporarily enjoining, barring, suspending or otherwise limiting his or her involvement in any type of business, securities or banking activities; and (4) being found by a court of competent jurisdiction (in a civil action), the SEC or the Commodities Futures Trading Commission to have violated a federal or state securities or commodities law, and the judgment has not been reversed, suspended or vacated.

 

Audit Committee

 

We do not have a separately-designated standing audit committee. The entire board of directors performs the functions of an audit committee, but no written charter governs the actions of the board of directors when performing the functions of that would generally be performed by an audit committee. The board of directors approves the selection of our independent accountants and meets and interacts with the independent accountants to discuss issues related to financial reporting. In addition, the board of directors reviews the scope and results of the audit with the independent accountants, reviews with management and the independent accountants our annual operating results, considers the adequacy of our internal accounting procedures and considers other auditing and accounting matters including fees to be paid to the independent auditor and the performance of the independent auditor.

 

We do not have an audit committee financial expert because of the size of our company and our board of directors at this time. We believe that we do not require an audit committee financial expert at this time because we retain outside consultants who possess these attributes as needed.

 

For the fiscal year ending December 31, 2011, the board of directors:

 

  1. Reviewed and discussed the audited financial statements with management, and
  2. Reviewed and discussed the written disclosures and the letter from our independent auditors on the matters relating to the auditor’s independence.

Based upon the board of directors’ review and discussion of the matters above, the board of directors authorized inclusion of the audited financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2011 to be included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

21
Table of Contents

Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance

 

Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act requires our directors and executive officers and persons who beneficially own more than ten percent of a registered class of the Company’s equity securities to file with the SEC initial reports of ownership and reports of changes in ownership of common stock and other equity securities of the Company. Officers, directors and greater than ten percent beneficial shareholders are required by SEC regulations to furnish us with copies of all Section 16(a) forms they file. To the best of our knowledge based solely on a review of Forms 3, 4, and 5 (and any amendments thereof) received by us during or with respect to the year ended December 31, 2011, the following persons have failed to file, on a timely basis, the identified reports required by Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act during fiscal year ended December 31, 2011:

 

Name and principal position

Number of

late reports

Transactions not

timely reported

Known failures to

file a required form

Terry Howlett

CEO, CFO & Director

0 2 0

Greg McCartney

Director

0 3 0
Lutz Family Trust 0 0 0
Doreen McMorran 1 2 0

 

Code of Ethics

 

We adopted a Code of Ethics for Financial Executives, which include our principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer or controller, or persons performing similar functions. The Code of Ethics was filed as an exhibit to the annual report on Form 10KSB for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004 and filed with the SEC on April 14, 2005.

 

Item 11. Executive Compensation

 

Compensation Discussion and Analysis

 

Currently, the objective of the cash compensation paid by the company is to provide fair reimbursement for the time spent by our executive officer and independent directors to the extent feasible within the financial constraints faced by our developing business. The stock options granted to our executive officer and to our independent directors are intended to provide these individuals with incentives to pursue the growth and development of the company’s operations and business opportunities. Although the options awarded to our executive and directors are typically exercisable immediately, they also remain valid and exercisable for terms of several years. We believe this provides the proper balance of short-term and long-term incentives to increase the value of the company. Although an immediate increase in share price following the issuance of the options would obviously result in a profit if those options were exercised, the longer exercisable period of the options also provides an incentive to increase value over the long term and gives our executive officer and directors the opportunity to realize gains based on the sustained growth of our operations and revenues.

22
Table of Contents

In addition, our sole executive officer holds substantial ownership in the company and is generally motivated by a strong entrepreneurial interest in expanding our operations and revenue base to the best of his ability.

 

Summary Compensation Table

 

The table below summarizes all compensation awarded to, earned by, or paid to our former or current executive officers for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010.

 

SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE

Name and principal position

Year Salary ($)

Bonus

($)

 

Stock

Awards

($)

Option

Awards

($)

Non-Equity

Incentive Plan

Compensation

($)

Nonqualified

Deferred

Compensation

Earnings ($)

All Other

Compensation

($)

Total

($)

Terry Howlett

CEO & CFO

2010

2011

 

180,000

180,000

-

-

-

-

56,808

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

236,808

180,000

 


Narrative Disclosure to the Summary Compensation Table

On January 29, 2009, we entered into an employment agreement with our sole executive officer, Terry Howlett. The agreement is effective retroactively to January 1, 2009, and term of the agreement is until December 31, 2012, and may be renewed for an additional 36 months unless terminated. Under the agreement, Mr. Howlett earns a cash stipend of $13,333.33 per month ($160,000 per year). Effective January 1, 2010, his cash stipend increased to $15,000 per month ($180,000 per year). He will also receive bonuses based on a percentage of license fees, royalty fees, and financings; paid vacation or the election to receive vacation benefits in payment; and reimbursements of expenses, including automobile and limited living expenses. In addition, the agreement provides for Mr. Howlett to be awarded stock options at the discretion of the board of directors.

 

Due to financial constraints, however, we were not able to pay Mr. Howlett any cash during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2011.

 

On December 31, 2011, we executed a convertible promissory note in favor of Terry Howlett, our CEO and member of our board of directors. The aggregate principal amount of his note is $415,657.03 and includes accrued salary through 2010 and the last six months of 2011. The interest rate on his note is 10% per annum, matures on December 31, 2016, is convertible into shares of our common stock at $0.04 per share, and includes a warrant for the right to purchase further shares at $0.06 per share if exercised within 3 years following the conversion date. The warrant agreement will give Mr. Howlett the right to purchase one share for every two shares acquired by him in the conversion.

 

On July 1, 2011, we executed a convertible promissory note in favor of Mr. Howlett. The aggregate principal amount of his note is $12,134.72 and includes accrued salary for the first six months of 2011. The interest rate on his note is 10% per annum, matures on June 30, 2012, is convertible into shares of our common stock at $0.05 per share, and includes a warrant for the right to purchase further shares at $0.08 per share if exercised within 3 years following the conversion date. The warrant agreement will give Mr. Howlett the right to purchase one share for every two shares acquired by him in the conversion.

 

The aggregate value of the above convertible notes and warrants, which totaled $ 427,791.75, was computed in accordance with ASC 718-10 “Compensation-Stock Compensation” and is reported in the summary compensation table above in the column titled “All Other Compensation.”

23
Table of Contents

Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End

 

The table below summarizes all unexercised options, stock that has not vested, and equity incentive plan awards for each named executive officer as of December 31, 2011.

 

OUTSTANDING EQUITY AWARDS AT FISCAL YEAR-END
OPTION AWARDS STOCK AWARDS
Name Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options (#)Exercisable Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options (#) Unexercisable Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Unearned Options (#) Option Exercise Price ($)(1) Option Expiration Date Number of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested(#) Market Value of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested ($) Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested (#) Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Market or Payout Value of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested (#)
Terry Howlett

1,000,000

400,000

200,000

1,000,000

1,000,000

1,000,000

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

0.04

0.04

0.04

0.04

0.08

0.06

10/19/2013

1/30/2013

1/3/2016(2)

1/19/2014

12/6/2014

11/14/2015

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

   
(1)On April 21, 2009, we modified the exercise price on all of our outstanding options issued prior to March 31, 2009 to $0.04 per share, which included all options issued to Mr. Howlett aside from the option issued on December 7, 2009 of 1,000,000 shares at $0.08 per share and the option issued on November 15, 2010 at $0.06 per share. Aside from this modification, during the last fiscal year there was not any outstanding option repriced or otherwise modified. There was no tandem feature, reload feature, or tax-reimbursement feature associated with any of the stock options we granted to our executive officers or otherwise.
(2)On January 10, 2010, our Board of Directors approved to extend the expiration date 5 years.
24
Table of Contents

Director Compensation

 

The table below summarizes all compensation of our directors as of December 31, 2011.

 

DIRECTOR COMPENSATION
Name Fees Earned or Paid in Cash ($) Stock Awards ($) Option Awards ($) Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation ($) Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Earnings ($) All Other Compensation ($) Total ($)
Greg McCartney 14,400 14,400

 

Narrative Disclosure to the Director Compensation Table

 

All the fees earned or paid in cash and stock options awards granted to Terry Howlett were earned in connection with his service as an executive officer. Mr. Howlett received no compensation for his service as a member of our board of directors.

 

We pay our independent directors a monthly fee of $1,200, which is sometimes paid in restricted common stock valued in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. Mr. McCartney received a total of 249,000 shares valued at an aggregate total of $ 14,400..

 

Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters

 

The following table sets forth, as of March 19, 2012, the beneficial ownership of our common stock by each executive officer and director, by each person known by us to beneficially own more than 5% of the our common stock and by the executive officers and directors as a group.

 


Title of class
Name and address of beneficial owner (1) Amount of beneficial ownership(2) Percent of class(3)
Executive Officers & Directors:
Common Terry Howlett(4) 27,774,437 shares 23.9%
Common Greg McCartney(5) 2,155,500 shares 1.9%
Total of All Directors and Executive Officers: 29,929,937 shares 22.7%
 
More Than 5% Beneficial Owners:

Lutz Family Trust(6)

8322 West Tonto Lane, Peoria, AZ 85382

11,117,500 shares 10.27%
Doreen McMorran(7) 29,286,297 shares 21.29%

 

(1)Except as otherwise indicated, the address of each person named in this table is c/o Skinvisible, Inc., 6320 South Sandhill Road, Suite 10, Las Vegas, Nevada 89120.
(2)As used in this table, "beneficial ownership" means the sole or shared power to vote, or to direct the voting of, a security, or the sole or shared investment power with respect to a security (i.e., the power to dispose of, or to direct the disposition of, a security). In addition, for purposes of this table, a person is deemed, as of any date, to have "beneficial ownership" of any security that such person has the right to acquire within 60 days after such date.
(3)Except as otherwise indicated, all shares are owned directly and the percentage shown is based on 108,228,909 shares of common stock issued and outstanding on March 19, 2012.
25
Table of Contents
(4)Includes 7,723,248 shares held in his name and options that may be exercised immediately to purchase 2,600,000 shares at a price of $0.04 per share, options that may be exercised immediately to purchase 1,000,000 shares at $0.08 per share, options that may be exercised immediately to purchase 1,000,000 shares at $0.06 per share, warrants that may be immediately exercised to purchase 1,500,000 shares at a price of $0.05 per share, a Debt Conversion Agreement which grants the right to convert gross salary debt owed of $12,134.72 into 242,700 shares of common stock at $0.05 per share, a warrant under the Debt Conversion Agreement to purchase 121,350 shares of common stock at $0.08 per share, a Debt Conversion Agreement which grants the right to convert gross salary debt owed of $415,657.03 into 10,391,426 shares of common stock at $0.04 per share, and a warrant under the Debt Conversion Agreement to purchase 5,195,713 shares of common stock at $0.06 per share.
(5)Includes 70,000 shares held in Penson Financial Services of Canada, Inc., options that may be exercised immediately to purchase 800,000 shares at a price of $0.04 per share, options that may be exercised immediately to purchase 250,000 shares at a price of $0.08 per share, and options that may be exercised immediately to purchase 250,000 shares at a price of $0.06 per share.
(6)As stated in the reporting person’s Form 3 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on January 25, 2010.
(7)As stated in the reporting person’s Form 5 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 25, 2012.

 

Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence

 

Aside from that which follows, none of our directors or executive officers, nor any proposed nominee for election as a director, nor any person who beneficially owns, directly or indirectly, shares carrying more than 5% of the voting rights attached to all of our outstanding shares, nor any members of the immediate family (including spouse, parents, children, siblings, and in-laws) of any of the foregoing persons has any material interest, direct or indirect, in any transaction since the beginning of our last fiscal year on January 1, 2011 or in any presently proposed transaction which, in either case, has or will materially affect us.

 

On December 31, 2011, we executed convertible promissory notes in favor of three key employees to provide the option to convert their accrued salary into common stock in our company. We have historically entered into these note agreements when cash was unavailable to meet our payroll obligations. The aggregate principal amount of the notes is $833,478.65 and includes unpaid accrued salary through 2010 and the last six months of 2011 for these employees. The principal amount belongs to the following persons in the following amounts:

 

Terry Howlett     $415,657.03
Doreen     $328,481.39
Jim Roszell     $89,340.23

 

Each note has an interest rate of 10% per annum, matures on December 31, 2016 and is convertible into shares of our common stock at $0.04 per share. In addition, we have agreed to issue a warrant agreement in the name of the employee’s designate, which will give the holder the right to purchase further shares at $0.06 per share if exercised within 3 years following the conversion date. The warrant agreement will give the holder the right to purchase one share for every two shares acquired by the employee.

 

We have executed separate convertible promissory notes in the aggregate principal amount of $107,578 in on July 1, 2011 for the first six months of 2011 for these same employees, and that information along with the terms of those notes has been disclosed in our prior SEC filings.

26
Table of Contents

Also on December 31, 2011, we executed convertible promissory notes in favor of Doreen McMorran in the aggregate principal amount of $289,599.66 for monies she loaned the company. Each note has an interest rate of 10% per annum, matures on December 31, 2012 and is convertible into shares of our common stock at $0.04 per share, except for $179,677.66 of the principal amount, which is convertible at $0.03 per share. In addition, we have agreed to issue a warrant agreement in the name of the Ms. McMorran’s designate, which will give the holder the right to purchase further shares at $0.06 per share ($0.05 per share for the $179,677.66 note) if exercised within 3 years following the conversion date. The warrant agreement will give the holder the right to purchase one share for every two shares acquired by Ms. McMorran.

 

Item 14. Principal Accounting Fees and Services

 

Below is the table of Audit Fees (amounts in US$) billed by our auditor in connection with the audit of the Company’s annual financial statements for the years ended:

 

Financial Statements for the
Year Ended December 31
Audit Services Audit Related Fees Tax Fees Other Fees
2010 $18,800 $0 $0 $0
2011 $17,500 $0 $0 $0

 

PART IV

 

Item 15. Exhibits, Financial Statements Schedules

 

(a) Financial Statements and Schedules

 

The following financial statements and schedules listed below are included in this Form 10-K.

 

Financial Statements (See Item 8)

 

(b) Exhibits

 

Exhibit Number Description
3.1 Articles of Incorporation, as amended (1)
3.2 Bylaws, as amended (1)
3.3 Certificate of Amendment to The Company’s Articles of Incorporation(2)
14.1 Code of Ethics (3)
23.1 Consent of Sarna & Company, Certified Public Accountants
31.1 Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Securities Exchange Act Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
31.2 Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Securities Exchange Act Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
32.1 Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

 

1Incorporated by reference to the Registration Statement on Form 10SB12G filed on April; 30, 1999.
2Incorporated by reference to the Report on Form 8-K filed on September 12, 2008.
3Incorporated by reference to Current report on Form 10-KSB filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 14, 2005.
27
Table of Contents

SIGNATURES

 

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

 

 

Skinvisible, Inc.
 
By: /s/ Terry Howlett

Terry Howlett

President, Chief Executive Officer, Principal Executive Officer,

Chief Financial Officer, Principal Financial Officer, Principal Accounting Officer and Director

 

April 16, 2012

 

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

 

By: /s/ Terry Howlett
Terry Howlett
Director
April 16, 2012
 
By: /s / Greg McCartney
Greg McCartney
Director
April 16, 2012

28