Definitive Additional Materials

 

 

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

SCHEDULE 14A

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the

Securities Exchange Act of 1934

(Amendment No.    )

Filed by the Registrant  ¨                            Filed by a Party other than the Registrant  x

Check the appropriate box:

 

¨ Preliminary Proxy Statement

 

¨ Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))

 

¨ Definitive Proxy Statement

 

x Definitive Additional Materials

 

¨ Soliciting Material Pursuant to §240.14a-12

    Kona Grill, Inc.    

(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)

    Mill Road Capital, L.P.    

    Mill Road Capital GP LLC    

    Mill Road Capital Management LLC    

    Thomas E. Lynch    

    Scott P. Scharfman    

    Charles M. B. Goldman    

    Justin C. Jacobs    

    Craig S. Miller    

    Lawrence F. Harris    

(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)

Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):

 

x No fee required.

 

¨ Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11.

 

  (1) Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:

          

 

  (2) Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:

          

 

  (3) Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):

          

 

 

  (4) Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:

          

 

  (5)   Total fee paid:

          

 

 

¨ Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.

 

¨ Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.

 

  (1) Amount Previously Paid:

          

 

  (2) Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:

          

 

  (3) Filing Party:

          

 

  (4) Date Filed:

          

 

 

 

 


April 15, 2010

To Our Fellow Shareholders of Kona Grill:

We are writing to you regarding the upcoming 2010 Annual Meeting of Shareholders of Kona Grill, Inc. (NasdaqGM: KONA)(the “Company”) scheduled to be held on Wednesday, April 28, 2010. At the Annual Meeting, you have two slates of candidates for the Board of Directors from which to choose—one from the Company and one from Mill Road Capital, L.P. (“Mill Road”).

It is important for you as a shareholder to understand why we have nominated an opposition slate. Mill Road is not an “activist” fund. Mill Road is currently the Company’s 3rd largest shareholder owning 9.8% of the common shares outstanding. We approach investing with a long-term mindset and believe in the long-term potential of the Company. This is the first time we have ever nominated a slate of candidates in opposition to the directors of a company. Our strong preference is to work with the management and board of a company in a constructive and positive manner. Regrettably, the actions of the Board of Directors of Kona Grill have left us little choice. Starting in late 2008, we have documented for the public record a series of actions that we believe demonstrate a track record of consistently poor corporate governance at Kona Grill. Since that time, we have reached out to the leadership of the Company in both public and private forums. Our efforts to reach an amicable compromise have been repeatedly rebuffed. Therefore, after much consideration, we were forced to choose the only remaining alternative: take the decision to the shareholders as to who should be on the Board of Directors of Kona.

The Company’s slate of candidates includes Douglas Hipskind, Anthony Winczewski, and Mark Zesbaugh. None of these three candidates have any restaurant operating experience. Outside of the Company, they have never served on the board of another restaurant company (either public or private) and they have never served on the board of another public company. Quite simply, they do not possess the necessary experience to serve as director for you, the shareholders and owners of the Company.

Mill Road has nominated Lawrence Harris, Thomas Lynch, and Craig Miller. Our nominees have substantial experience in restaurant operations, on the boards of restaurant companies, and on the board of public companies. A summary of their experience is as follows:

 

   

Larry Harris. Mr. Harris is a seasoned restaurant industry executive with more than 30 years of public and private restaurant experience at all levels. He is currently the CEO, Chairman of the Board, and a Partner of Food Management Partners, Inc. (“FMP”), a multi-concept restaurant management company operating more than 85 units under the Buffalo Wild Wings, Zio’s Italian Kitchens, Smashburger, and Little Caesar’s brands. FMP has won awards including Franchisee (2009) and Developer (2001) of the Year for Buffalo Wild Wings. Mr. Harris has also served as the Chief Operations Officer for Pizza Hut operations in Mexico, as well as President of the Harvest Restaurant Group, Inc.


   

Thomas Lynch. Mr. Lynch is an accomplished investor with a deep financial understanding of the restaurant industry. Mr. Lynch has a successful two decade track record of investing, having founded both Mill Road Capital and Lazard Capital Partners. Previously, he was a member of the private equity group at The Blackstone Group. From 2003 to 2006, Mr. Lynch served on the Board of Directors of Panera Bread Company, one of the most successful public restaurant companies of the last decade. He was recently reappointed to the Board in March 2010.

 

   

Craig Miller. Mr. Miller is an award-winning restaurant industry executive with more than 35 years of public and private restaurant experience. He has served as the President, CEO, and Chairman of the Board of Ruth’s Chris Steak House, Inc. where he was named Operator of the Year in 2007 by Nation’s Restaurant News. Mr. Miller has also served as the President and CEO of UNO Restaurants, Inc. He currently serves on the Board of Directors of Tim Hortons Inc., a publicly traded restaurant chain, and on the Board of Directors of Real Mex Restaurants, Inc., a restaurant chain with publicly traded debt securities.

Considering our slate of candidates along the three crucial aspects of relevant experience (operating restaurants, serving on restaurant boards, and serving on public company boards), we urge you to return the GOLD proxy card and vote for our nominees.

It is important to note that Mr. Harris and Mr. Miller have no previous affiliation with Mill Road. Mill Road has neither voting nor compensation agreements (other than reimbursement of expenses) with Mr. Harris and Mr. Miller.

We have disclosed in several SEC filings that we have indicated our interest in financing and/or acquiring the Company on multiple occasions. As such, you may pause before supporting Mill Road’s three nominees to serve on the Company’s Board of Directors. To alleviate any concern you may have, we would like to publicly disclose our view on two key issues: 1) transactions involving interested parties or insiders and 2) the appointment of a Director to the Company’s currently vacant 7th Board seat.

 

  1. Transaction Involving Interested Parties or Insiders. If any party, whether Mill Road, an insider or any other party, should submit a proposal regarding a financing or acquisition of the Company, we would expect the Board to adhere to market practice and form a special committee of disinterested directors to properly evaluate the proposal and retain outside financial and legal advisors. Of course, if Mill Road submitted a proposal, we would expect this committee would not include Thomas Lynch who, as an employee of Mill Road, would remove himself from discussions. All of our nominees are absolutely committed to acting in the best interest of all shareholders, and we would expect that any pursuit of strategic alternatives, whether or not in response to a proposal from Mill Road, would consist of a fair and open process that seeks to maximize value through consideration of proposals submitted by multiple parties. Ultimately, any potential financing or sale of the Company should be voted upon by all of the Company’s shareholders.


  2.

Appointment of a Director to the Vacant 7th Board Seat. We believe the Company and its shareholders are best served if the Board of Directors has substantial restaurant operation experience, restaurant board experience, and public company board experience. Therefore, we believe that the 7th Board seat, which is currently open, should be filled by a person with substantial experience in these three key areas. Additionally, this candidate should have no affiliation with either Mill Road or other members of the Board of Directors. We strongly believe in good corporate governance and that shareholders would be best served by the addition of an independent voice with significant relevant experience.

To help you in your decision as to which slate of candidates to support, please read our definitive proxy statement and the excerpts of a presentation Mill Road made to RiskMetrics Group on April 8, 2010 regarding the election of directors for the Company. The definitive proxy statement, which contains information relating to the participants in the proxy solicitation in support of Mill Road’s nominees, and the excerpts of the presentation to RiskMetrics are both available at no charge on the Securities and Exchange Commission’s website at www.sec.gov and on our proxy solicitor’s website at www.icommaterials.com or by contacting our proxy solicitor, InvestorCom, Inc., by telephone toll-free at 1-877-972-0090. We hope you will find this information helpful as you consider which slate to support.

It is important to reiterate that Mill Road remains open to considering all alternatives that can protect and maximize shareholder value. We thank you for your time and consideration of this matter and appreciate your vote.

 

Kind regards,

/s/    JUSTIN C. JACOBS        

Justin C. Jacobs
Managing Director
Mill Road Capital, L.P.


Excerpts of Presentation to RiskMetrics
Group
by Mill Road Capital, L.P.
2010 Annual Meeting of Shareholders of Kona Grill, Inc.
April 8, 2010


1
Notice to Shareholders
All stockholders of Kona Grill, Inc. are advised to read Mill Road's definitive proxy
statement because it contains important information, including information relating to the
participants in the solicitation of proxies in support of Mill Road's nominees for use at the
2010 annual meeting of stockholders of Kona Grill, Inc.  The definitive proxy statement
and GOLD proxy card will be mailed to the stockholders of Kona Grill, Inc. and are also
available at no charge on the Securities and Exchange Commission’s website at
www.sec.gov
or by contacting our proxy solicitor, InvestorCom, Inc., by telephone toll-
free at 1-877-972-0090.


2
Summary
Comparison of Slates
There are 3 required areas of experience for Nominees:
Restaurant Operating
Restaurant Board
Public Company Board
Company’s Nominees lack all 3
Mill
Road’s
Nominees
have
an
abundance
of
experience
in
all
3
Poor governance at Board with consistent pattern of self-dealing
The stock price and operational performance are significantly behind comparable
companies
The current Board does not have the necessary experience to allow the
management team to succeed
Mill Road is asking all shareholders to return a GOLD proxy card
and vote
for our Nominees


3
Mill Road Capital
Mill Road Capital:
$250 million private investment fund based in
Greenwich, CT
Background:
Core group of former Blackstone professionals
Successful track record of public and private investing
Long-term focus with 12 year commitment from our investors
Investment Strategy:
Exclusive focus on small, public companies
Portfolio: equity & debt investments in minority & control positions
Representative investments
Physician’s Formula: ~20% shareholder & subordinated debt holder
Cossette: “white-knight”
with management in going-private transaction
Mill Road is not an “activist”
fund:
This is the first slate of candidates we have ever nominated
We have chosen this path only after all other options were exhausted


4
Situation Summary
Annual Meeting of Shareholders: April 28, 2010
Kona Grill’s Board of Directors
Staggered board with 3 classes
Board seats: 7
Board seats filled: 6
Class up for election has 3 seats
Slate of Nominees
Company nominated 3 incumbent directors for re-election
Mill Road nominated 3 opposition candidates
Former CEO, Marcus Jundt, nominated himself and then withdrew
Mill Road is asking shareholders to vote for all 3 of our Nominees


5
Kona Grill Board of Directors
Kona’s non-employee directors have no other
Restaurant Operating Experience
Restaurant Board Experience
Public Board Experience
Relevant Experience (Non-Kona)
Restaurant
Public
Name
Background
Operating
Board
Board
Douglas Hipskind
Gaia Leasing (commercial leasing)
None
None
None
Black Diamond Resorts (hotel development)
Jundt Associates (hedge fund)
KPMG (accounting)
Anthony Winczewski
Commerical Partners Title (title insurance)
None
None
None
Chicago Title Insurance (title insurance)
Winona Co. Abstract & Title (title insurance)
Mark Zesbaugh
Green Creek Consulting (self-employed)
None
None
None
Lennox Holdings (start-up re-insurance)
Allianz Life Insurance (insurance)
Berke Bakay
BBS Capital Mgt. (hedge fund)
None
None
None
Patara Capital Mgt. (investment firm)
Southwest Securities (regional securities firm)
Richard Hauser
Capital Real Estate (real estate)
None
None
None
Reliance Development Company (real estate)
Marc Buehler (CEO)
Kona Grill (restaurant)
see
Tony Roma's
None
Lone Star Steakhouse (restaurant)
background
Tony Roma's (restaurant)
Eateries (restaurant)
Applebee's (restaurant)
Source: Kona Grill’s Proxy filed 3/9/10


6
Kona Grill Board –
Common Denominator
This Board is a holdover from when Kona was private
Kona is headquartered in Scottsdale, AZ and the first two units were in Arizona
4 of 5 outside directors are from Minnesota
The former CEO, Marcus Jundt, is also from Minnesota
Kona
Common
Director
Shares
Name
Age
Since
Address in Proxy
Owned
Douglas Hipskind
41
2003
50 South 6th Street
0
Suite 1480
Minneapolis, MN 55402
Anthony Winczewski
54
2005
200 South 6th Street
0
Suite 1300
Minneapolis, MN 55402
Mark Zesbaugh
45
2007
3515 Thorwood Court
0
Eagan, MN 55123
Berke Bakay
31
2009
4875 Preston Park Blvd
1,139,000
Suite 775W
Plano, TX 75093
Richard Hauser
48
2004
50 South 6th Street
675,302
Suite 1480
Minneapolis, MN 55402
Marc Buehler
40
2009
7150 East Camelback Road
27,243
Suite 220
Scottsdale, AZ 85251
Source: Kona Grill’s Proxy filed 3/9/10


7
Mill Road Nominees
Mill Road’s nominees have extensive experience in each of the following
critical areas:
Restaurant Operations
Restaurant Board of Directors
Public Company Board of Directors
The Nominees
Larry Harris
Thomas Lynch
Craig Miller
Relationship of the Nominees
All 3 Nominees would be considered independent
Larry Harris and Craig Miller
No other affiliation with Mill Road
No compensation or voting agreement with Mill Road


8
Nominee: Larry Harris
Headline: 30+ Year Track Record of Operational Success in Restaurants
Selected Restaurant Experience:
CEO,
Chairman
of
Board
and
a
Partner
of
Food
Management
Partners
(10+
years)
Buffalo Wild Wings –
franchisee (27 units open, 5 in development, 22 committed)
Zio’s Italian Kitchens –
owner (17 units open, 2 in development)
Smashburger –
franchisee (4 units open, 2 in development, 39 committed)
Little Caesar’s –
franchisee (37 units open, 2 in development, 17 committed)
President & COO of Harvest Restaurant Group (~3 years)
COO of Pizza Hut operations in Mexico (~10 years)
Awards/Achievements:
Buffalo Wild Wings
Franchisee of the Year (2009)
Developer of the Year (2001)
Zio’s Italian Kitchen
Purchased EBITDA negative company (2007) and turned around to generate
significant EBITDA by 2009
Little Caesar’s
Operational Excellence Award (2006)


9
Nominee: Thomas Lynch
Headline:
Long-Term
Investor
with
Significant
Board
Experience
at
Top
Restaurant Performer
Select Experience:
Founder & Senior Managing Director of Mill Road Capital (6+ years)
Founder & Senior Managing Director of Lazard Capital Partners (~3 years)
Managing Director of The Blackstone Group (~7 years)
Consultant at The Monitor Group (~3 years)
Public Company Board Experience:
Panera Bread
Member of Board of Directors: 2003-2006 (Audit and Nominating
Committees)
Recently asked to re-join the Board as of March 2010
People’s Choice TV
Awards/Achievements:
Mill Road Capital
Fund has consistently and significantly outperformed benchmark indices
Lazard Capital Partners
One of top 1997 vintage private equity funds
One of top debut funds of last 15 years


10
Nominee: Craig Miller
Headline:  35+Year Career as Top Tier Restaurant Operator with Public, Restaurant
Board Experience
Selected Restaurant Experience:
President, CEO & Chairman of Ruth’s Chris Steak House (4+ years)
President, CEO of UNO Restaurants (Pizzeria Uno) (~20 years)
VP of Darden Restaurants (~10 years)
Red Lobster
Casa Gallardo
Additional Board of Directors
Tim Horton’s (Audit Committee)
Real Mex Restaurants
Awards/Achievements:
“2007
Operator
of
the
Year”
for
Ruth’s
Chris
Awarded
by
Nation’s
Restaurant
News
Two-time “Golden Chain Award”
In 2000 as President, CEO of UNO Restaurants
In 2007 as President, CEO & Chairman of Ruth’s Chris Steak House
UNO Restaurants grew from 15 units to ~200 units over his tenure
National Restaurant Association: Chairman of the Board (2005-2006)


11
Comparison of Slates
A summary comparison of relevant experience in the key areas illustrates
the superior slate put forward by Mill Road
Relevant Experience (Non-Kona)
Restaurant
Public
Name
Operating
Board
Board
Douglas Hipskind
None
None
None
Anthony Winczewski
Mark Zesbaugh
Lawrence Harris
Buffalo Wild Wings
Food Mgt. Partners
Panera Bread
Thomas Lynch
Zio's Italian Kitchen
Panera Bread
Galaxy Nutritional Foods
Craig Miller
Smashburger
Ruth's Chris Steak House
People's Choice TV
Little Caesar's
Tim Horton's
Ruth's Chris Steak House
Boston Chicken
Real Mex
Tim Horton's
Pizza Hut
Ruth's Chris Steak House
Pizzeria Uno
Casa Gallardo
Red Lobster


12
Governance Deficit
Kona Grill has a set of policies that are inconsistent with good
corporate
governance
Policy Examples
Staggered board
Plurality voting for directors
Shareholders do not have cumulative voting rights in elections
Shareholders can not call a special meeting
Shareholders may not act by written consent
Shareholders need super-majority to change charter and by-laws
Board may amend by-laws without shareholder approval
Output of Policies
The Board adopts a Poison Pill which is voted down by shareholders in 2009
Former Chairman/CEO is re-elected in 2009 even though 53% of shares voted
against/withheld in an uncontested election
A director and chair of Audit Committee resigned in July 2006 citing “board
governance process”
related to appointment of CEO
Board lacks majority of independent directors for 6 months and only gains compliance
through resignation of Chairman/CEO


13
Governance Deficit: Culture of Self-Dealing
The Board of Kona Grill has a consistent track record of self-
dealing
Key examples
In December 2008, the Board approved a financing in a non-competitive
process for the sale of stock representing ~15% of the Company to the
Chairman/CEO’s father at an ~20% discount to the market price
Upon announcement, Mill Road publicly offered to purchase the stock but at a price
22% higher
Company does not respond to our offer but in February 2009, the Agreement with
the Chairman/CEO’s father is mutually terminated
In March 2009, the Company completed a financing with Board members
and their families on terms materially less favorable to the Company than
those described in a term sheet provided to potential outside investors
(including Mill Road) just 3 days prior


14
Kona Grill Operational Performance
Compared to similar price points competitors, Kona has significantly under-
performed along 2 key metrics:
Same-Store Sales Growth (SSS)
Unit Profitability (Rest. Operating Margin)
(1)
Figures calculated utilizing average check and alcohol percentage per each company’s latest 10-K for the specific concepts listed above
(2)
One year period represents CY2009 same-store sales change.  Three year period represents the cumulative
calendarized full year same-store sales change for the
CY2007, CY2008, and CY2009 periods.  If a company does not have a calendar year end, then calendarized full year same-store sales change data assumed equal to
the average of the calendar quarters or months, as available, for each period
(3)
Change in restaurant margin (restaurant EBITDA) during the one year period from Q4 CY2008 to Q4 CY2009 and during the three year
period from Q4 CY2006
to Q4 CY2009
1 Year Change
3 Year Change
Average Check (1)
Rest. Op.
Rest. Op.
Restaurant Concept
Ticker
Food
Alcohol
Total
SSS (2)
Margin (3)
SSS (2)
Margin (3)
RA Sushi
BNHN
$13.89
$7.16
$21.05
1.7%
1.3%
-4.9%
-4.7%
The Cheesecake Factory
CAKE
$16.53
$2.47
$19.00
-2.6%
3.4%
-6.5%
-1.8%
Red Lobster
DRI
$17.83
$1.42
$19.25
-3.8%
N/A
-4.7%
N/A
Maggiano's
EAT
$21.12
$4.76
$25.88
-6.7%
N/A
-9.8%
N/A
J. Alexander's
JAX
$20.38
$4.26
$24.64
-4.7%
-0.2%
-8.7%
-8.8%
PF Chang's China Bistro
PFCB
$17.53
$2.97
$20.50
-6.7%
0.5%
-11.1%
-1.3%
Average of MRC Comparables
$21.72
-3.8%
1.2%
-7.6%
-4.1%
Kona Grill
KONA
$16.35
$7.55
$23.90
-9.3%
-6.0%
-13.6%
-8.1%


15
Kona Grill vs. RA Sushi
Kona has materially under-performed its closest comparable, RA Sushi, even
though it is less geographically exposed to the financial crisis…
(1)
Figures per Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS).  Local unemployment rate is defined as the average of the unemployment rates in each county a unit exists in, weighed
by the number of units in the county.  Figure as of November 2009 (latest available)
(2)
Figure are not seasonally adjusted as BLS does not report seasonally adjusted county data.  Seasonally adjusted, November 2009 would be 10.0%
(3)
See previous page for additional details
Kona Grill
RA Sushi
Difference
Average Check :
Food Check
$16.35
$13.89
$2.46
Alcohol
7.55
7.16
0.39
Total Average Check
$23.90
$21.05
$2.85
Units Per State:
Arizona
4
6
(2)
California
0
6
(6)
Florida
2
3
(1)
Michigan
1
0
1
Nevada
1
1
0
Hardest Hit States Sub-Total
8
16
(8)
Texas
5
3
2
Illinois
2
3
(1)
Other
9
3
6
Total Units
24
25
(1)
Local Unemployment Rate (1):
Local Unemployment Rate
8.5%
9.7%
-1.2%
National Average (2)
9.4%
9.4%
Operating Statistics (3):
3 Year Cummulative
SSS
-13.6%
-4.9%
-8.6%
3 Year Operating Margin
-8.1%
-4.7%
-3.4%


16
Kona Grill New Unit Performance
The decline in new unit revenue has resulted in Return on Invested
Capital (ROI) significantly below targeted levels
Notes:
“Targeted”
figures per January 2010 Investor Presentation, Slide 34, except for pre-opening costs, which are added in per 2009 10-K, Page 4.  ROI calculated on the same
basis as in the January 2010 Investor Presentation (excluding cash pre-opening costs) would increase to 35%
“New Units”
figures utilize actual annualized average weekly sales figures and an estimated 5% operating margin.  The operating margin is based on CFO Mark Robinow’s
comment
during
the
Q3
2009
conference
call
(October
27,
2009)
that
new
units
had
an
operating
margin
in
the
“lower
single
digits.”
Accordingly,
Mill
Road
believes
the
5% assumption is likely generous.  Build costs matched to “Targeted”
figures.  New unit # does not include units opened during the period
“Construction Costs”
are net of tenant improvement allowances as noted in the company presentation
New Units
All figures $mm, unless otherwise noted
Targeted
Q3 2009
Q4 2009
New Units (#)
5
6
New Units as % of Total
23%
26%
Annual Revenue
$4.5
$2.9
$3.0
Restaurant Operating Margin
19%
5%
5%
Unit Operating Profit
$0.9
$0.1
$0.1
Construction Costs
$2.5
$2.5
$2.5
Pre-Opening Costs
0.4
0.4
0.4
Total Build Costs
$2.9
$2.9
$2.9
Cash-on-Cash ROI
30%
5%
5%


17
Kona Grill Stock Price Performance
Kona’s stock price performance significantly lags its peer group over
all relevant
time periods except the last year
However, the last year has an extraordinary event…
(1)
Includes BJRI, BNHN, CAKE, GCFB, JAX, MSSR, and PFCB.  As defined in Kona’s 10-K.
(2)
Includes BNHN, CAKE, JAX, and PFCB.
Note:   Time Period is through 3/31/10
Stock Price Performance
Over/(Under)
Peer Group, defined by
Performance vs.
Time Period
KONA
10-K (1)
MRC (2)
10-K (1)
MRC (2)
Since IPO (Since 8/16/05)
-70%
-38%
-33%
-32%
-37%
Last 3 Years
-75%
-38%
-30%
-37%
-45%
Last 2 Years
-56%
-6%
-2%
-50%
-54%
Last Year
134%
100%
112%
35%
22%


18
Kona
Grill
Stock
Price
Performance
Last
Year
Adjusted
Although the Company
outperformed its peers over
the last year by 22%-35%,
there is an extraordinary event
in this period
On May 18
th
, 2009, Mill Road
made a public filing expressing
interest to acquire the
Company at a 101% premium
If the increase from this one-
time event is removed from
performance from the rest of
the year, Kona lags its peer
group by 83%
Peer Group Index includes BJRI, BNHN, CAKE, GCFB, JAX, MSSR, and
PFCB as defined in Kona’s 10-K. Time Period is through 3/31/10.
Kona
vs.
Peer
Group
--
Last
Year
0%
50%
100%
150%
200%
250%
300%
3/31/09
5/1/09
6/3/09
7/6/09
8/7/09
9/9/09
10/12/0911/11/0912/14/09
1/15/10
2/18/10
3/22/10
KONA
Peer Group Index
Mill Road
Expression
of Interest
Adjusted
Performance


19
Why Has Relative Performance Been So Poor?
Lack of Restaurant Operating Experience
CEO’s
Marcus Jundt: no restaurant operating background
Mark Bartholomay: experience primarily in business development and
franchising
Board of Directors
Management Turnover
In the last 8 years, Kona has had 6 different CEO’s compared to the peer
group average of 1.9
Operating Decisions
Drastic Menu Changes –
80% of menu
Poor Real Estate Selections
Decreased Food Quality –
Cost of Sales down 140bps
Lack of Investment in People –
no Head of HR
Elimination of Key Promotion: “Half Price Happy Hour”


20
Mill Road Capital –
Leadership Plan for Kona Grill
Operating Performance
New CEO in place –
can be successful with proper support structure
Focus on operations to improve customer experience
Elevate quality of raw protein inputs
Improve consistency of in-store execution
Increase training
Leadership
Appoint 7
th
Director –
must have significant restaurant operating experience
and should be independent
Assess strengths and weaknesses of current operating team
Ensure menu is consistent with vision of concept
Adopt corporate governance best practices and emphasize ethical leadership
Capital Structure
Company does not have capital to grow
Unit economics do not currently justify growth
Re-establish unit economics before even considering new growth


21
Summary
Comparison of Slates
There are 3 required areas of experience for Nominees:
Restaurant Operating
Restaurant Board
Public Company Board
Company’s Nominees lack all 3
Mill Road’s Nominees have an abundance of experience in all 3
Poor governance at Board with consistent pattern of self-dealing
The stock price and operational performance are significantly behind comparable
companies
The current Board does not have the necessary experience to allow the
management team to succeed
Mill Road is asking all shareholders to return a GOLD proxy card
and vote
for our Nominees