INTERNET INITIATIVE JAPAN INC.
As filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on July 6, 2007
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 20-F
|
|
|
(Mark One) |
|
o |
|
REGISTRATION STATEMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(b) OR (g) OF
THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
OR
|
|
|
þ |
|
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the fiscal year ended March 31, 2007
OR
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 or 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
OR
|
|
|
o |
|
SHELL COMPANY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
Date of event requiring this shell company report
Commission file number: 0-30204
Kabushiki Kaisha Internet Initiative
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)
Internet Initiative Japan Inc.
(Translation of Registrants Name Into English)
Japan
(Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization)
Jinbocho Mitsui Bldg.
1-105 Kanda Jinbo-cho
Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo 101-0051, Japan
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)
Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Title of Each Class
|
|
Name of Each Exchange On Which Registered |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
The NASDAQ Stock Market |
|
Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
Common Stock, no par value
(Title of Class)
Securities for which there is a reporting obligation pursuant to Section 15(d) of the Act:
None
(Title of Class)
Indicate the number of outstanding shares of each of the issuers classes of capital or common
stock as of the close of the period covered by the annual report.
As of March 31, 2007, 204,300 shares of common stock were outstanding, including 27,409 shares
represented by an aggregate of 10,963,600 American Depositary Shares.
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of
the Securities Act.
Yes o No þ
If this report is an annual or transition report, indicate by check mark if the registrant is not
required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
Yes o No þ
NoteChecking
the box above will not relieve any registrant required to file
reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 from their obligations under those Sections.
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for
such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of accelerated filer and large accelerated filer in
Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large Accelerated Filer o Accelerated Filer þ Non-Accelerated Filer o
Indicate by check mark which financial statement item the registrant has elected to follow:
Item 17 o Item 18 þ
If this is an annual report, indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as
defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
Yes o No þ
Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements
This annual report contains forward-looking statements about us and our industry that are
based on our current expectations, assumptions, estimates and projections. These forward-looking
statements are subject to various risks and uncertainties. These statements discuss future
expectations, identify strategies, discuss market trends, contain projections of results of our
operations and our financial condition, and state other forward-looking information. Known and
unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors could cause our actual results to differ materially
from those contained in or suggested by any forward-looking statement. We cannot provide any
assurance that our expectations, projections, anticipated estimates or other information expressed
in these forward-looking statements will turn out to be correct. We do not undertake any obligation
to update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future
events or otherwise.
Important risks and factors that could cause our actual results to differ materially from our
forward-looking statements are generally provided in Item 3.D. and elsewhere in this annual report
on Form 20-F and include, without limitation:
|
|
|
that we may not be able to achieve or sustain profitability in the near future, |
|
|
|
|
that we may not be able to compete effectively against competitors which have
greater financial, marketing and other resources, and |
|
|
|
|
that we may not be able to attract and retain qualified personnel. |
1
As used in this annual report, references to IIJ, the Company, we, our, our group
and us are to Internet Initiative Japan Inc. and its subsidiaries except as the context otherwise
requires.
PART I
|
|
|
Item 1. |
|
Identity of Directors, Senior Management and Advisers. |
Not required.
|
|
|
Item 2. |
|
Offer Statistics and Expected Timetable. |
Not applicable.
A. |
|
Selected Financial Data. |
You should read the selected consolidated financial data below together with Item 5.
Operating and Financial Review and Prospects, of this annual report on Form 20-F and our
consolidated financial statements and the notes to our consolidated financial statements beginning
on page F-1. The consolidated statement of operations data and per share and American Depositary
Shares (ADS) data below for the fiscal years ended March 31, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006 and 2007, the
consolidated balance sheet data below as of March 31, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006 and 2007 and
consolidated statements of cash flows for the fiscal years ended March 31, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006
and 2007 under operating data below are derived from our audited financial statements, which have
been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States
(U.S. GAAP), and audited by Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu, an independent registered public accounting
firm.
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of and for the fiscal year ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2003 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
(millions of yen, except per share and ADS data) |
|
|
(thousands of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. dollars, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
except per |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
share and ADS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
data(1)) |
|
Statement of Operations Data: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
REVENUES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Connectivity and value-added
services: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dedicated access |
|
¥ |
13,815 |
|
|
¥ |
12,862 |
|
|
¥ |
11,373 |
|
|
¥ |
10,625 |
|
|
¥ |
10,792 |
|
|
$ |
91,797 |
|
Dial-up access |
|
|
3,155 |
|
|
|
3,088 |
|
|
|
2,937 |
|
|
|
2,674 |
|
|
|
2,416 |
|
|
|
20,554 |
|
Value-added services |
|
|
3,603 |
|
|
|
4,296 |
|
|
|
5,005 |
|
|
|
6,250 |
|
|
|
7,416 |
|
|
|
63,079 |
|
Other |
|
|
1,726 |
|
|
|
2,118 |
|
|
|
3,169 |
|
|
|
3,674 |
|
|
|
3,729 |
|
|
|
31,725 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
22,299 |
|
|
|
22,364 |
|
|
|
22,484 |
|
|
|
23,223 |
|
|
|
24,353 |
|
|
|
207,155 |
|
Systems integration |
|
|
15,013 |
|
|
|
11,848 |
|
|
|
15,854 |
|
|
|
23,505 |
|
|
|
30,527 |
|
|
|
259,672 |
|
Equipment sales |
|
|
6,706 |
|
|
|
4,567 |
|
|
|
3,365 |
|
|
|
3,085 |
|
|
|
2,175 |
|
|
|
18,496 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
|
44,018 |
|
|
|
38,779 |
|
|
|
41,703 |
|
|
|
49,813 |
|
|
|
57,055 |
|
|
|
485,323 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
COST AND EXPENSES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of connectivity and
value-added services |
|
|
20,387 |
|
|
|
20,047 |
|
|
|
19,484 |
|
|
|
20,078 |
|
|
|
20,545 |
|
|
|
174,765 |
|
Cost of systems integration |
|
|
13,090 |
|
|
|
9,852 |
|
|
|
12,200 |
|
|
|
18,120 |
|
|
|
23,529 |
|
|
|
200,145 |
|
Cost of equipment sales |
|
|
6,417 |
|
|
|
4,346 |
|
|
|
3,111 |
|
|
|
2,818 |
|
|
|
1,894 |
|
|
|
16,104 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cost |
|
|
39,894 |
|
|
|
34,245 |
|
|
|
34,795 |
|
|
|
41,016 |
|
|
|
45,968 |
|
|
|
391,014 |
|
Sales and marketing |
|
|
3,176 |
|
|
|
3,528 |
|
|
|
2,795 |
|
|
|
3,080 |
|
|
|
3,439 |
|
|
|
29,251 |
|
General and administrative |
|
|
2,205 |
|
|
|
2,098 |
|
|
|
2,666 |
|
|
|
3,147 |
|
|
|
3,971 |
|
|
|
33,776 |
|
Research and development |
|
|
414 |
|
|
|
358 |
|
|
|
199 |
|
|
|
159 |
|
|
|
177 |
|
|
|
1,508 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cost and expenses |
|
|
45,689 |
|
|
|
40,229 |
|
|
|
40,455 |
|
|
|
47,402 |
|
|
|
53,555 |
|
|
|
455,549 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OPERATING INCOME (LOSS) |
|
|
(1,671 |
) |
|
|
(1,450 |
) |
|
|
1,248 |
|
|
|
2,411 |
|
|
|
3,500 |
|
|
|
29,774 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OTHER INCOME (EXPENSES): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income |
|
|
67 |
|
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
196 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
(733 |
) |
|
|
(702 |
) |
|
|
(686 |
) |
|
|
(437 |
) |
|
|
(397 |
) |
|
|
(3,381 |
) |
Other net |
|
|
(603 |
) |
|
|
1,646 |
|
|
|
2,573 |
|
|
|
3,392 |
|
|
|
1,923 |
|
|
|
16,356 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income
(expenses) net |
|
|
(1,269 |
) |
|
|
982 |
|
|
|
1,900 |
|
|
|
2,968 |
|
|
|
1,549 |
|
|
|
13,171 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INCOME (LOSS) FROM OPERATIONS BEFORE
INCOME TAX EXPENSE (BENEFIT),
MINORITY INTERESTS AND EQUITY IN NET
LOSS OF EQUITY METHOD INVESTEES |
|
|
(2,940 |
) |
|
|
(468 |
) |
|
|
3,148 |
|
|
|
5,379 |
|
|
|
5,049 |
|
|
|
42,945 |
|
INCOME TAX EXPENSE (BENEFIT) |
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
257 |
|
|
|
(804 |
) |
|
|
(6,839 |
) |
MINORITY INTERESTS IN (EARNINGS)
LOSSES OF SUBSIDIARIES |
|
|
153 |
|
|
|
236 |
|
|
|
(109 |
) |
|
|
(354 |
) |
|
|
(233 |
) |
|
|
(1,979 |
) |
EQUITY IN NET LOSS OF EQUITY METHOD
INVESTEES:(2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity method net loss |
|
|
(5,625 |
) |
|
|
(286 |
) |
|
|
(33 |
) |
|
|
(14 |
) |
|
|
(210 |
) |
|
|
(1,788 |
) |
Impairment loss on
investment, advance and
deposits for Crosswave |
|
|
(7,153 |
) |
|
|
(1,720 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of and for the fiscal year ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2003 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
(millions of yen, except per share and ADS data) |
|
|
(thousands of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. dollars, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
except per |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
share and ADS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
data(1)) |
|
Total equity in net
loss of equity method
investees |
|
¥ |
(12,778 |
) |
|
¥ |
(2,006 |
) |
|
¥ |
(33 |
) |
|
¥ |
(14 |
) |
|
¥ |
(210 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,788 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET INCOME (LOSS) |
|
¥ |
(15,588 |
) |
|
¥ |
(2,271 |
) |
|
¥ |
2,906 |
|
|
¥ |
4,754 |
|
|
¥ |
5,410 |
|
|
$ |
46,017 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Per Share and ADS Data(3): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic net income (loss) per share |
|
¥ |
(138,689 |
) |
|
¥ |
(14,321 |
) |
|
¥ |
15,172 |
|
|
¥ |
24,301 |
|
|
¥ |
26,519 |
|
|
$ |
226 |
|
Diluted net income (loss) per share |
|
|
(138,689 |
) |
|
|
(14,321 |
) |
|
|
15,172 |
|
|
|
24,258 |
|
|
|
26,487 |
|
|
|
225 |
|
Basic net income (loss) per ADS
equivalent |
|
|
(346.72 |
) |
|
|
(35.80 |
) |
|
|
37.93 |
|
|
|
60.75 |
|
|
|
66.30 |
|
|
|
0.57 |
|
Diluted net income (loss) per ADS
equivalent |
|
|
(346.72 |
) |
|
|
(35.80 |
) |
|
|
37.93 |
|
|
|
60.65 |
|
|
|
66.22 |
|
|
|
0.56 |
|
Basic weighted average number of
shares |
|
|
112,400 |
|
|
|
158,554 |
|
|
|
191,559 |
|
|
|
195,613 |
|
|
|
203,992 |
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted weighted average number of
shares |
|
|
112,400 |
|
|
|
158,554 |
|
|
|
191,559 |
|
|
|
195,955 |
|
|
|
204,244 |
|
|
|
|
|
Basic weighted average number of ADS
equivalents (thousands) |
|
|
44,960 |
|
|
|
63,422 |
|
|
|
76,624 |
|
|
|
78,245 |
|
|
|
81,597 |
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted weighted average number of
ADS equivalents (thousands) |
|
|
44,960 |
|
|
|
63,422 |
|
|
|
76,624 |
|
|
|
78,382 |
|
|
|
81,698 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance Sheet Data: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalent |
|
¥ |
3,588 |
|
|
¥ |
12,284 |
|
|
¥ |
5,286 |
|
|
¥ |
13,727 |
|
|
¥ |
13,555 |
|
|
$ |
115,299 |
|
Total assets |
|
|
32,064 |
|
|
|
42,737 |
|
|
|
37,116 |
|
|
|
50,705 |
|
|
|
47,693 |
|
|
|
405,691 |
|
Short-term borrowings |
|
|
4,824 |
|
|
|
6,564 |
|
|
|
4,725 |
|
|
|
4,555 |
|
|
|
6,050 |
|
|
|
51,463 |
|
Current portion of long-term
borrowings, including capital lease
obligations |
|
|
4,660 |
|
|
|
3,936 |
|
|
|
5,511 |
|
|
|
4,994 |
|
|
|
3,243 |
|
|
|
27,588 |
|
Long-term borrowings, including
capital lease obligations |
|
|
7,092 |
|
|
|
5,188 |
|
|
|
5,869 |
|
|
|
5,271 |
|
|
|
4,318 |
|
|
|
36,733 |
|
Convertible notes(4) |
|
|
15,000 |
|
|
|
11,832 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock |
|
|
7,082 |
|
|
|
13,765 |
|
|
|
13,765 |
|
|
|
16,834 |
|
|
|
16,834 |
|
|
|
143,194 |
|
Total shareholders equity (capital
deficiency) |
|
|
(10,004 |
) |
|
|
6,214 |
|
|
|
11,615 |
|
|
|
20,222 |
|
|
|
20,112 |
|
|
|
171,079 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Data: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures, including
capitalized leases(5) |
|
¥ |
4,893 |
|
|
¥ |
3,523 |
|
|
¥ |
5,011 |
|
|
¥ |
4,762 |
|
|
¥ |
3,953 |
|
|
$ |
33,622 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating margin ratio(6) |
|
|
(3.8 |
)% |
|
|
(3.7 |
)% |
|
|
3.0 |
% |
|
|
4.8 |
% |
|
|
6.1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating activities |
|
¥ |
1,582 |
|
|
¥ |
1,923 |
|
|
¥ |
5,238 |
|
|
¥ |
6,559 |
|
|
¥ |
7,402 |
|
|
$ |
62,959 |
|
Investing activities |
|
|
(7,878 |
) |
|
|
(852 |
) |
|
|
1,974 |
|
|
|
1,805 |
|
|
|
(3,014 |
) |
|
|
(25,635 |
) |
Financing activities |
|
|
(872 |
) |
|
|
7,669 |
|
|
|
(14,213 |
) |
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
(4,560 |
) |
|
|
(38,786 |
) |
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The U.S. dollar amounts represent translations of yen amounts at the rate of ¥117.56 which
was the noon buying rate in New York City for cable transfers in foreign currencies as
certified for customs purposes by the Federal Reserve Bank of New York prevailing as of March
31, 2007. |
|
(2) |
|
Of total equity method net loss of ¥5,625 million for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2003,
¥5,514 million was based on unaudited financial information made publicly available by
Crosswave Communications Inc. (Crosswave) and the impairment loss on investment and deposits
for Crosswave was determined to be the amount required to reduce |
4
|
|
|
|
|
the carrying amount of investment in and deposits for Crosswave at March 31, 2003 to zero. The
audit report of Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu in respect of our financial statements as of and for
the fiscal year ended March 31, 2003 was qualified as to the effects of such adjustments, if
any, as might have been determined to be necessary if sufficient evidence regarding the equity
method loss, the impairment loss on investment, advance to and deposits for Crosswave and the
related summary information of Crosswave for the year ended March 31, 2003 was available. As
described elsewhere in this annual report, Crosswave filed a voluntary petition for corporate
reorganization proceedings in Japan in August 2003 and has not prepared audited financial
statements for the year ended March 31, 2003 or other sufficient evidence of its results of
operations to permit the independent registered public accounting firm to issue an audit report
on our financial statements as of and for the year ended March 31, 2003 without such
qualification. |
|
(3) |
|
We conducted a 1 to 5 stock split effective on October 11, 2005. The per share data is
calculated based on the assumption that the stock split was made at the beginning of the
fiscal year ended March 31, 2003. We did not declare any dividends during the five year period
presented. On June 26, 2007, our shareholders approved the payment of a cash dividend to
shareholders of record as of March 31, 2007 of ¥1,500 per share, an aggregate amount of ¥306
million. |
|
(4) |
|
In April 2000, we issued 1.75 percent unsecured convertible yen notes due March 2005 in the
aggregate principal amount of ¥15,000 million. In November 2003 and June 2004, we repurchased
and cancelled a portion of the aforementioned notes, in the aggregate principal amount of
¥3,168 million and ¥744 million, respectively. We redeemed the remainder of the unsecured
convertible notes in March 2005. |
|
(5) |
|
Further information regarding capital expenditures, including capitalized leases and a
reconciliation to the most directly comparable U.S. GAAP financial measure can be found below. |
|
(6) |
|
Operating income (loss) as a percentage of total revenues. |
Reconciliations of the Disclosed Non-GAAP Financial Measures to the Most Directly Comparable GAAP Financial Measures
Capital expenditures
We define capital expenditures as purchases of property and equipment plus acquisition of
assets by entering into capital leases. We have included the information concerning capital
expenditures because our management monitors our capital expenditure budgets and believes that it
is useful to investors to know the trends of our capital expenditures and analyze and compare
companies on the basis of such investments. Capital expenditures, as we have defined it, may not be
comparable to similarly titled measures used by other companies.
The following table summarizes the reconciliation of capital expenditures to purchases of
property and equipment and acquisition of assets by entering into capital leases as reported in our
consolidated statements of cash flows prepared and presented in accordance with U.S. GAAP.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the fiscal year ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2003 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
(millions of yen) |
Capital expenditures: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition of assets by entering into capital leases |
|
¥ |
3,578 |
|
|
¥ |
1,866 |
|
|
¥ |
4,434 |
|
|
¥ |
3,843 |
|
|
¥ |
2,665 |
|
Purchases of property and equipment |
|
|
1,315 |
|
|
|
1,657 |
|
|
|
577 |
|
|
|
919 |
|
|
|
1,288 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total capital expenditures |
|
¥ |
4,893 |
|
|
¥ |
3,523 |
|
|
¥ |
5,011 |
|
|
¥ |
4,762 |
|
|
¥ |
3,953 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exchange Rates
Fluctuations in exchange rates between the Japanese yen and the U.S. dollar and other
currencies will affect the U.S. dollar and other currency equivalent of the yen price of our shares
and the U.S. dollar amounts received on conversion of any cash dividends, which in turn will affect
the U.S. dollar price of our ADSs. We
5
have translated some Japanese yen amounts presented in this annual report into U.S. dollars
solely for your convenience. Unless otherwise noted, the rate used for the translations was ¥117.56
per U.S. $1.00, which was the noon buying rate in New York City for cable transfers in foreign
currencies as certified for customs purposes by the Federal Reserve Bank of New York prevailing as
of March 31, 2007, the date of our most recent consolidated balance sheet contained in this annual
report. Translations do not imply that the yen amounts actually represent, or have been or could be
converted into, equivalent amounts in U.S. dollars.
The following table presents the noon buying rates for Japanese yen per U.S. $1.00 in New York
City for cable transfers in foreign currencies as certified for customs purposes by the Federal
Reserve Bank of New York:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
High |
|
Low |
|
Average(1) |
|
Period-end |
Fiscal year ended March 31, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2003 |
|
¥ |
133.40 |
|
|
¥ |
115.71 |
|
|
¥ |
121.10 |
|
|
¥ |
118.07 |
|
2004 |
|
|
120.55 |
|
|
|
104.18 |
|
|
|
112.75 |
|
|
|
104.18 |
|
2005 |
|
|
114.30 |
|
|
|
102.26 |
|
|
|
107.28 |
|
|
|
107.22 |
|
2006 |
|
|
120.93 |
|
|
|
104.41 |
|
|
|
113.67 |
|
|
|
117.48 |
|
2007 |
|
|
121.81 |
|
|
|
110.07 |
|
|
|
116.55 |
|
|
|
117.56 |
|
|
Calendar year 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January |
|
¥ |
121.81 |
|
|
¥ |
118.49 |
|
|
¥ |
120.45 |
|
|
¥ |
121.02 |
|
February |
|
|
121.77 |
|
|
|
118.33 |
|
|
|
120.50 |
|
|
|
118.33 |
|
March |
|
|
118.15 |
|
|
|
116.01 |
|
|
|
117.26 |
|
|
|
117.56 |
|
April |
|
|
119.84 |
|
|
|
117.69 |
|
|
|
118.93 |
|
|
|
119.44 |
|
May |
|
|
121.79 |
|
|
|
119.77 |
|
|
|
120.77 |
|
|
|
121.76 |
|
June |
|
|
124.09 |
|
|
|
121.08 |
|
|
|
122.69 |
|
|
|
123.39 |
|
July (through July 3, 2007) |
|
|
122.40 |
|
|
|
122.32 |
|
|
|
122.36 |
|
|
|
122.40 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
For fiscal years, calculated from the average of the exchange rates on the last day of each
month during the period. For calendar year months, calculated based on the average of daily
exchange rates. |
The noon buying rate on July 3, 2007 was ¥122.40 per $1.00.
B. |
|
Capitalization and Indebtedness. |
Not required.
C. |
|
Reasons for the Offer and Use of Proceeds. |
Not applicable.
You should carefully consider the following information, together with the other information
contained in this annual report on Form 20-F, including our financial statements and the related
notes, before making an investment decision. Any risks described below could result in a material
adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations.
We may not maintain our current level of revenues or achieve our expected revenues and profits in the future.
Although we recorded operating income and net income in and after the fiscal year ended March
31, 2005, we incurred operating losses and net losses in each of the prior six fiscal years, with
the exception of
6
positive operating income for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2002, and our accumulated
deficit as of March 31, 2007 amounted to ¥24.3 billion.
If the Japanese economy deteriorates or does not improve, and it results in significantly
lower levels of network-related investment or corporate customers respond to conditions by putting
a priority on low price rather than quality, it may make it difficult to maintain our current level
of revenues or achieve our expected revenues and profits.
In addition to factors related to general economic conditions in Japan, we may not be able to
maintain our current level of revenues and profits or achieve our expected levels of revenues and
profits due to several other factors, including, but not limited to:
|
|
|
a decrease in revenues from our Internet connectivity services because of lower
unit prices per bandwidth and cancellation of large accounts especially due to severe
price competition, |
|
|
|
|
lower revenue growth and lower margins in our growing value-added services and
systems integration, if we fail to successfully differentiate our services from those
of our competitors, or experience a significant decrease in systems integration
revenues from period to period due to the cancellation of one or more large projects
or changes in the number of projects resulting from a seasonal fluctuation in the
systems integration business in Japan, |
|
|
|
|
an increase in backbone costs due to increased volume of Internet traffic and
demand for leasing backbone lines, or a decline in the profitability of connectivity
services if we contract for more capacity than we actually utilize to serve our
customers, |
|
|
|
|
an increase in expenses for network infrastructure, research and development and
other similar investments which we may be forced to make in the future in order to
remain competitive, or increased expenses relating to the leasing of additional
equipment, |
|
|
|
|
an increase in outsourcing costs, especially in our systems integration, if
outsourcing costs increase, or we fail to manage outsourcing projects effectively or
fail to cover outsourcing costs by raising enough revenues from outsourced projects, |
|
|
|
|
an increase in SG&A costs, such as personnel expenses and advertising expenses, in
conjunction with our expected or planned or continued business expansion, |
|
|
|
|
the recording of an impairment loss as a result of an impairment test on the
non-amortized intangible assets such as goodwill that is recorded related to any
mergers and acquisitions, |
|
|
|
|
a decline in the value and trading volume of our holding of available-for-sale
securities from which we expect gains on sale or impairment losses on
stocks of
companies, |
|
|
|
|
an increase of equity in net loss of equity method investees affected by an
increase of net loss of our equity method investees, and |
|
|
|
|
an amount and timing of recognition of deferred tax benefits or expenses resulting
from a release or an increase of valuation allowance against deferred income tax
assets related to tax operating loss carryforwards and others. |
Please see Item 5, Operating and Financial Review and Prospects for more detailed
information concerning our operations and other results.
7
We may not be able to compete effectively, especially against competitors with greater financial, marketing and other resources.
The major competitors of our connectivity and value-added services are major
telecommunications carriers like NTT Communications Corporation (NTT Communications) and KDDI
Corporation (KDDI). Price competition for Internet connectivity services is still severe and may
increase. For value-added services, price competition may also increase. This competition may
adversely affect our revenues and profitability and may make it difficult for us to retain existing
customers or attract new customers. The major competitors of our systems integration business are
systems integrators like IBM Japan, NEC Corporation, Fujitsu Limited, NTT Data Corporation and
their affiliates. Our major competitors have the financial resources to reduce prices in an effort
to gain market share. There is strong competition among systems integrators that may adversely
affect our revenues and profitability. Even though Nippon Telegraph and Telephone Corporation
(NTT) and NTT Communications purchased shares of our company in September 2003, which resulted in
the NTT Group becoming our largest shareholder, we plan to continue to operate our company
separately and independently from the NTT Group, and will therefore continue to compete with the
NTT Group.
Our competitors have advantages over us, including, but not limited to:
|
|
|
substantially greater financial resources, |
|
|
|
|
more extensive and well-developed marketing and sales networks, |
|
|
|
|
higher brand recognition among consumers, |
|
|
|
|
larger customer bases, and |
|
|
|
|
more diversified operations which allow profits from some operations to support
operations with lower profitability, such as the network services, for which we are a
competitor. |
With these advantages, our competitors may be better able to:
|
|
|
sustain downward pricing pressure, including pressure on low-price Internet
connectivity services offered to corporate customers, which are our target customers, |
|
|
|
|
develop, market and sell their services, |
|
|
|
|
adapt quickly to new and changing technologies, |
|
|
|
|
obtain new customers, and |
|
|
|
|
aggressively pursue mergers and acquisitions to enlarge their customer base and
market share. |
If we fail to attract and retain qualified personnel, we may not be able to achieve our expected business growth.
Our network, services, products and technologies are complex, and as a result, we depend
heavily on the continued service of our engineering, research and development, and other personnel.
As our business grows, we need to hire additional engineering, research and development, and other
personnel. In particular, in order to continue to increase our revenues from value-added services
and systems integration, we require more sales and engineering personnel to achieve our
expectations. We are not sure that we will be able to
8
keep or attract these human resources and control human resources cost adequately. Competition
for qualified engineers, research and development personnel and employees in the telecommunications
service industry in Japan is intense, and there is a limited number of persons with the necessary
knowledge and experience. None of our employees are bound by any employment or noncompetition
agreement. The realization of any or all of these risks may result in a failure to achieve our
expected business growth.
Our business may be adversely affected if our network suffers interruptions, errors or delays.
Interruptions, errors or delays with respect to our network may be caused by a number of man
made or natural factors, many of which are beyond our control, including, but not limited to,
damage from fire, earthquakes or other natural disasters, power loss, sabotage, computer hackers,
human error, computer viruses and other similar events. Much of our computer and networking
equipment and the lines that make up our network backbones are concentrated in a few locations that
are in earthquake-prone areas. Any disruption, outages, or delays or other difficulties
experienced by any of our technological and information systems and networks could result in a
decrease in new or existing accounts, loss or exposure of confidential information, reduction in
revenues and profits, costly repairs or upgrades, reputational damage and decreased consumer
confidence in our business, any or all of which could have a material adverse effect on our
business, financial condition and results of operations.
If we fail to keep and manage our confidential customer information, we could be subject to lawsuits, incur expenses associated with our security systems or suffer damage to our reputation.
We keep and manage confidential information and trade secrets obtained from our customers. We
exercise care in protecting the confidentiality of such information and take steps to ensure the
security of our network, in accordance with the law protecting personal information that came into
effect in April 2005 and the requirements set by the Ministry of Internal Affairs and
Communications (MIC), and the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry. However, our network, like
all Information Technology systems, is vulnerable to external attack from computer viruses, hackers
or other such sources. In addition, despite internal controls, misconduct by an employee could
result in the improper use or disclosure of confidential information. If any material leak of such
information were to occur, we could be subject to lawsuits for damages from our customers, incur
expenses associated with repairing or upgrading our security systems and suffer damages to our
reputation that could result in a severe decline in new customers as well as an increase in service
cancellations. The realization of these or similar risks may have a material adverse effect on our
business, financial condition and result of operations.
Business growth and a rapidly changing operating environment may strain our limited resources.
We have limited operational, administrative and financial resources, which could be inadequate
to sustain the growth we want to achieve. As the number of our customers and their Internet usage
increases, as traffic patterns change and as the volume of information transferred increases, we
will need to increase expenditures for our network and other facilities in order to adapt our
services and to maintain and improve the quality of our services. If we are unable to manage our
growth and expansion, the quality of our services could deteriorate and our business may suffer.
If we fail to keep up with the rapid technological changes in our industry, our services may become
obsolete and we may lose customers.
Our markets are characterized by:
|
|
|
rapid technological change, |
|
|
|
|
frequent new product and service introductions, |
9
|
|
|
continually changing customer requirements, and |
|
|
|
|
evolving industry standards. |
If we fail to obtain access to new or important technologies or to develop and introduce new
services and enhancements that are compatible with changing industry technologies and standards and
customer requirements, we may lose customers.
Our pursuit of necessary technological advances may require substantial time and expense. Many
of our competitors have greater financial and other resources than we do and, therefore, may be
better able to meet the time and expense demands of achieving technological advances. Additionally,
this may allow our competitors to respond more quickly to new and emerging technologies and
standards or invest more heavily in upgrading or replacing equipment to take advantage of new
technologies and standards.
We depend on our executive officers, and if we lose the service of our executive officers,
particularly Mr. Koichi Suzuki, our business and our relationships with the customers, major
shareholders of IIJ and other IIJ Group companies and our employees could suffer.
Our future success depends on the continued service of our executive officers, particularly
Mr. Koichi Suzuki, who is our president, chief executive officer and representative director, as
well as the president and chief executive officer and representative director of our major
subsidiaries. We rely in particular on his expertise in the operation of our businesses and on his
relationships with our shareholders, the shareholders of the IIJ Group companies, our business
partners and our employees. None of our executive officers, including Mr. Suzuki, is bound by an
employment or noncompetition agreement.
Our investments in our subsidiaries and affiliated companies may not produce the returns we expect
and may require additional funding.
As part of our business strategy and for the purpose of maintaining various strategic business
relations, we have, in the past, invested in a number of companies. There can be no assurance that
we will be able to maintain or enhance the value or performance of such companies in which we have
invested or may invest in the future, or that we will achieve the returns or benefits sought from
these investments. Our substantial investment in Crosswave, our former equity method investee, for
example, became worthless due to Crosswaves commencement of corporate reorganization proceedings.
In August 2003, Crosswave filed a voluntary petition for the commencement of corporate
reorganization proceedings in Japan, and as a result of our equity method net loss and an
impairment loss taken in respect of our investment in Crosswave, our net loss for the fiscal year
ended March 31, 2003 was ¥15.6 billion, the highest net loss that we have ever experienced. We also
wrote off ¥2.1 billion of loans and accounts receivable outstanding from Crosswave for the fiscal
year ended March 31, 2004. We also had an impairment loss relating to our investment in Asia
Internet Holding Co., Ltd. (AIH) for the fiscal year ended March 2004. To the extent that these investments are
accounted for by the equity-method and to the extent that the investee companies have net losses,
our financial results will be adversely affected to the extent of our pro rata portion of these
losses. Furthermore, we may lose all or part of our investment in these companies if their value
decreases as a result of their financial performance or if these companies go bankrupt. If our
interests differ from those of other investors in entities over which we do not exercise control,
we may not be able to enjoy synergies with the investees and it may adversely affect our financial
results or financial condition.
We have invested in new subsidiaries and affiliated companies to expand our business and
service offerings available to our customers. In February 2006, we invested ¥750 million in
Internet Revolution Inc. (i-revo), a joint venture that we established with Konami Corporation,
and i-revo is our equity method investee. In August 2006, we invested ¥110 million and established
Net Chart Japan Inc. (NCJ) as our wholly owned subsidiary and NCJ succeeded the network
construction business of Net Chart Japan
10
Corporation for ¥75 million. In April 2007, we invested ¥300 million in GDX Japan, K.K.
(GDX) to acquire 51% of the equity of GDX and GDX became our consolidated subsidiary. GDX is a
joint venture established with GDX Network, Inc. which is a company in the United States, to
provide a message exchange network service in Japan. In June 2007, we acquired 100% of the equity
of hi-ho, Inc. (hi-ho) from Panasonic Network Services Inc. (PNS) to take over PNSs Internet
service business for personal users and its solution business for its corporate customers for
¥1,200 million. In July 2007, we invested ¥235 million in Taihei Computer Co., Ltd (TCC) to
acquire 45% of the equity of TCC, which manages customer loyalty reward program systems. TCC became
our equity method investee. We may provide additional financial support in the form of loans to or
additional equity investments in these subsidiaries and affiliated companies to enhance or maintain
our business synergies with these subsidiaries and affiliated companies.
We have reorganized our subsidiaries. In October 2005, IIJ Media Communications Inc.
(IIJ-MC), our former subsidiary, was merged into us after a portion of IIJ-MCs business was
transferred to IIJ Technology Inc. (IIJ-Tech) and we have acquired AIH, our former equity method investee, after AIH became our wholly owned consolidated
subsidiary. In May 2007, we made our two subsidiaries, IIJ-Tech and Net Care, Inc., wholly owned
through share exchanges to increase synergies among our group companies and allocate group
resources more efficiently to provide our total network solutions to our customers. However, there
is no guarantee that we will be able to achieve the benefit of the transactions as expected.
We may have an impairment loss as a result of an impairment test on the non-amortized intangible
assets that is recorded related to mergers and acquisitions.
As of March 31, 2007, our intangible assets such as goodwill were approximately ¥2.8 billion.
If the business operations of our subsidiaries and others are adversely affected by factors such as
a significant adverse change in their business climate, we may have an impairment loss as a result
of an impairment test on the non-amortized intangible assets such as goodwill. The realization of
any impairment losses on the non-amortized intangible assets may result in material adverse effects
on our financial condition and results of operations.
The amounts and timing of recognition of deferred tax benefits or expenses related to tax operating
loss carryforwards may adversely affect our financial results.
As of March 31, 2007, the Company had tax operating loss carryforwards of ¥17.1 billion. The
loss carryforwards are available to offset future taxable income and will expire as shown in Note 9
to our consolidated financial statements. We recorded
¥1.5 billion of deferred tax benefit resulting from a release of
valuation allowance against deferred income tax assets related to tax operating loss carryforwards
for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2007. The amounts and timing of recognition of
the deferred tax benefits or expenses may adversely affect our financial condition and results of
operations.
Fluctuations in the stock prices of companies or impairment losses on stocks of companies in which
we have invested may significantly influence our financial condition.
We have invested in non-affiliated companies in order to further our business relationships
with these companies. We recorded gross realized gains from the sale of available-for-sale
securities of ¥3.2 billion for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2007 and the book value of our
remaining available-for-sale securities was ¥1.3 billion at March 31, 2007. We may acquire
additional securities of non-affiliated companies. However, the
book value can change significantly due to changes in the financial condition of non-affiliated
companies, general economic conditions in Japan or fluctuations in the Japanese stock markets.
Fluctuations in the stock prices of companies in which we have invested may have a significant
effect on our financial results. As a result, we may not be able to achieve our expected gains on
the sale of available-for-sale securities. In addition, should we choose to sell all or a portion
of these shares, it is
11
not certain that we will be able to do so on favorable terms. Furthermore, we may have an
impairment loss on stocks of companies in which we have invested. For the fiscal year ended March
31, 2007, we recorded an impairment loss of ¥ 1.4 billion on unlisted securities, including an
impairment loss of ¥1.0 billion on the securities of IPMobile Incorporated.
NTT, our largest shareholder, could exercise substantial influence over us in a manner which may
not necessarily be in our interest or that of our other shareholders.
NTT and its affiliates currently own 29.7% of our outstanding shares as of March 31, 2007. In
September 2003, we entered into a subscription agreement with NTT. Under this subscription
agreement, we have agreed to allow NTT to nominate up to three persons as either directors or
company auditors, subject to approval by our shareholders at our first general shareholders
meeting after NTTs investment. At our general shareholders meeting on June 24, 2004, two
directors nominated from NTT Group were appointed, one of whom was nominated as an executive vice
president. At our general shareholders meeting on June 28, 2006, our executive vice president, Mr.
Fukuzo Inoue, completed his term and retired, and an other director, Mr. Takashi Hiroi was
reapproved to be an outside director. As our largest shareholder, NTT may be able to exercise
substantial influence over us. In addition, as part of this subscription agreement, we have agreed
to collaborate with NTT in various businesses. While we intend to conduct our day-to-day operations
independently of NTT and its group companies and believe that NTT also plans for us to operate
independently, NTT may decide to exercise substantial influence over us in a manner which could
impair our ability to operate independently. Furthermore, NTT may take actions that are in its best
interests, which may not be in our interest or that of other shareholders.
We rely greatly on other telecommunications carriers and other suppliers, and could be affected by
disruptions in service or delays in the delivery of their products and services.
We rely on telecommunications carriers such as NTT Communications and KDDI for a significant
portion of our network backbone and Nippon Telegraph and Telephone East Corporation and Nippon
Telegraph Telephone West Corporation and electric power companies and their affiliates for local
access lines for our customers. After the transfer of operating lease agreements from Crosswave,
our former equity method investee, following its filing for corporate reorganization, we now
procure significant portions of our network backbone and data center facilities pursuant to
operating lease agreements with NTT Communications, our largest provider of network infrastructure.
For the fiscal year ended March 31, 2007, 66.2% in costs for our domestic network backbone was for
NTT Communications. We are subject to potential disruptions in these telecommunications services
and, in the event of such disruption, we may have no means of replacing these services, on a timely
basis or at all.
In the Asia-Pacific region, we depend on telecommunications carriers in various countries
including less-developed countries whose quality of service may not be stable or who are more
susceptible to economic or political instability.
We also depend on third-party suppliers of hardware components like routers that are used in
our network. We acquire certain components from limited sources, typically from Cisco Systems, Inc.
A failure by one of our suppliers to deliver quality products on a timely basis, or the inability
to develop alternative sources if and as required, may delay our ability to expand the capacity and
scope of our network.
Any problems experienced by our telecommunications carriers and other suppliers could have a
material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
12
The risks inherent in international markets and other risks associated with our international
business may adversely affect our future international expansion and our financial results.
By operating our network internationally, we expose ourselves to the risks of international
markets and to other risks that do not exist or are less significant in Japan. One of the
components of our strategy is to continue to expand our network reach through our network between
the United States and Japan to maintain our network quality. In addition, we have invested in the
data center businesses in South Korea. Our international business operations continue to require
management attention and financial resources, both of which are in limited supply. We face
significant exposure to risks in connection with our international operations, including:
|
|
|
the impact of economic conditions outside Japan, |
|
|
|
|
unexpected changes in or delays resulting from regulatory requirements, |
|
|
|
|
the rate of the development of the Internet industry in countries in Asia, |
|
|
|
|
political and economic instability, and |
|
|
|
|
potential unsatisfactory financial returns from our investments in Asia, including
the data center businesses in which we have invested in South Korea. |
These factors could adversely affect our future international expansion and, consequently, our
business, financial condition and results of operations.
If we fail to execute our systems integration projects in a timely or satisfactory manner or if we
fail to manage customer data in a professional manner, we could be sued and our reputation could
suffer.
A significant portion of our future revenue depends on systems integration projects which we,
in cooperation with IIJ-Tech and Net Care, have been contracted to perform. We may not be able to
perform our responsibilities under these contracts to the satisfaction of our customers, or at all,
if we lack a sufficient number of qualified engineers, lack sufficient task-management capabilities
for software-development vendors or fail to manage customer data adequately. If we do not execute
these services and projects as contracted or fail to manage customer data in a professional manner,
our receipt of revenues may be delayed or lost altogether and we could be sued by our
counterparties, which could in turn have an adverse impact on our reputation, results of operation
and financial condition.
Regulatory matters and new legislation could impact our ability to conduct our business.
The licensing, construction and operation of telecommunications systems and services in Japan
are subject to regulation and supervision by the MIC. We operate pursuant to licenses and approvals
that have been granted by the MIC.
Our licenses have an unlimited duration, but are subject to revocation by the MIC if we
violate any telecommunications laws and regulations in a manner that is deemed to harm the public
interest, if we or any of our directors are sentenced to a fine or any more severe penalty under
the telecommunications laws, if we employ a director who was previously sentenced to a fine or more
severe penalty thereunder or if we have had a license revoked in the past.
Existing and future governmental regulation may substantially affect the way in which we
conduct business. These regulations may increase the cost of doing business or may restrict the way
in which we offer products and services. As a result of the amendment in April 2004 of the
Telecommunication Business Law
13
and deregulation including elimination of the regulatory distinction between carriers
providing telecommunications services through networks owned by other telecommunication carriers
and carriers which own or have long-term leases for the networks through which they offer
telecommunication services, competition may increase. Furthermore, we cannot predict future
regulatory changes which may affect our business. Any changes in laws, such as those described
above, or regulations or MIC policy affecting our business activities and those of our competitors
could adversely affect our financial condition or results of operations. For more information, see
Item 4., Business Overview Regulation of the Telecommunications Industry in Japan.
We may be named as defendants in litigation, which could have an adverse impact on our business,
financial condition and results of operations.
We are involved in normal claims and other legal proceedings in the ordinary course of our
business. We believe that there are no cases currently pending which would have a significant
financial impact on us, but we cannot be certain that we will not be named in a future lawsuit. Any
judgment against us in such a lawsuit, or in any future legal proceeding, could have an adverse
effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
In the event we need to raise capital, we may sell additional shares of our common stock or
securities convertible into our common stock, which may cause shareholders to incur substantial
dilution.
We may raise additional funds in the future to raise additional working capital and for other
financial needs. We completed private placements in June and September 2003 of an aggregate of
15,880 shares of our common stock to investors in Japan in order to raise funds for working capital
and repayment of convertible notes. We issued 12,500 new shares of our common stock along with our
listing on the Mothers market of the Tokyo Stock Exchange in December 2005, after conducting a 1 to
5 split of our shares of common stock in October 2005. On May 11, 2007, we issued 2,178 shares of
common stock to make our two consolidated subsidiaries wholly owned through share exchanges. If we
choose to raise such funds from the issuance of equity shares of our common stock or securities
convertible into our common stock, existing shareholders may incur substantial dilution.
Item 4. Information on the Company.
A. |
|
History and Development of the Company. |
We are incorporated in Japan as a joint stock corporation under the name Internet Initiative
Japan Inc. (IIJ). We were incorporated in December 1992 and operate under the laws of Japan. We
began operations in July 1993, making us one of the first commercial providers in Japan to offer
Internet connectivity services. In February 1994, we acquired a Type II Telecommunications license,
which enables us to operate our own international backbone networks. We became a public company in
August 1999 with our initial public offering of American Depositary Shares (ADSs) on the Nasdaq
National Market.
On August 20, 2003, Crosswave Communications Inc. (Crosswave), our former equity method
investee and primary provider of data communication services, and two of its subsidiaries filed
voluntary petitions with the Tokyo District Court for the commencement of corporate reorganization
proceedings, which are proceedings to rehabilitate an insolvent company similar in some respects to
Chapter 11 bankruptcy proceedings in the United States. As a result, we wrote-off our investment in
Crosswave and no longer consider Crosswave to be an IIJ Group company. On December 15, 2003, the
business operations of Crosswave, including its network on which we relied to provide our network
services, were transferred to NTT Communications Corporation (NTT Communications). We have
contracted with NTT Communications for the continued use of the network it acquired from Crosswave.
14
On June 26 and September 16, 2003, we completed private placements of a total of 15,880 shares
of our common stock to investors in Japan for an aggregate amount of ¥13.3 billion for working
capital and repayment of our outstanding 1.75% convertible notes due on March 31, 2005. As a result
of these transactions, the total number of our issued shares of common stock increased to 38,360
and shareholding of the Nippon Telegraph and Telephone Corporation (NTT) Group increased to
31.6%. We have also agreed with NTT that it has the right to nominate three persons to serve as
either our directors or company auditors, subject to shareholder approval of any nomination at our
first general shareholders meeting after NTTs investment. In addition, we and NTT agreed to
undertake efforts to jointly engage in the development of broadband and Information Technology and
other related business, to expand the business relationship between us and NTT in connection with
new business opportunities and to discuss secondment of employees to each other.
On October 1, 2005, IIJ Media Communications Inc. (IIJ-MC), our former consolidated
subsidiary, was merged into us after a portion of IIJ-MCs business was transferred to IIJ
Technology Inc. (IIJ-Tech), our consolidated subsidiary. Asia Internet Holding Co., Ltd., our
former equity method investee, became our wholly owned consolidated subsidiary, and was merged into
us on October 1, 2005. In each of the mergers, we became the surviving company. On May 11, 2007, we
made our two subsidiaries, IIJ-Tech and Net Care, Inc. (Net Care) wholly owned through share
exchanges to increase synergies among our group companies and allocate group resources more
efficiently to provide our total network solutions to our customers.
On December 2, 2005, we listed on the Mothers market of the Tokyo Stock Exchange (TSE). In
connection with the listing, we issued 12,500 new shares of common stock for an amount of ¥6.0
billion. As we conducted a 1 to 5 split of our shares of common stock on October 11, 2005, the
total number of our issued shares of common stock increased to 204,300. On December 14, 2006, we
moved to the First Section of the TSE for our listing in Japan, without the issuance of new shares.
On February 1, 2006, we established a joint venture company, Internet Revolution Inc.
(i-revo) with Konami Corporation, with the purpose of operating comprehensive portals sites. We
invested ¥750 million and hold 30.0% of the company. i-revo is our equity method investee. On
August 10, 2006, we invested ¥110 million and established Net Chart Japan Inc. (NCJ) as our
wholly owned subsidiary to provide network construction that is mainly related to Local Area
Networks. In April 2007, we invested ¥300 million in GDX Japan, K.K. (GDX) to acquire 51% of the
equity of GDX and GDX became our consolidated subsidiary to provide a message exchange network
service in Japan. On June 1, 2007, we acquired 100% of the equity of hi-ho, Inc. (hi-ho) for
¥1,200 million from Panasonic Network Services Inc. (PNS) to take over PNSs Internet service
business for personal users and its solution business for its corporate customers. In July 2007, we
invested ¥235 million in Taihei Computer Co., Ltd (TCC) to acquire 45% of the equity of TCC,
which manages customer loyalty reward program systems. TCC became our equity method investee.
Our head office is located at Jinbo-cho Mitsui Bldg., 1-105 Kanda Jinbo-cho, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo
101-0051, Japan, and our telephone number at that location is (813) 5259-6500. Our agent in the
United States is IIJ America Inc., 1211 Avenue of the Americas, Suite 2900, New York, New York
10036 and the telephone number at that location is (212) 440-8080. We have a web site that you may
access at http://www.iij.ad.jp/. Information contained on our web site does not constitute part of
this annual report on Form 20-F.
For a discussion of capital expenditures and divestitures currently in progress and those for
the past three years, see Capital Expenditures in Item 4.B.
We offer a comprehensive range of Internet connectivity services and network solutions to our
customers in Japan. We offer our services on one of the most advanced and reliable Internet
networks
15
available in Japan. Our services are based upon high-quality networking technology tailored to
meet the specific needs and demands of our customers.
We offer, together with other companies or independently, a variety of services to our
customers as part of our total network solutions. Our primary services are our Internet
connectivity services, value-added services and systems integration. Our Internet connectivity
services range from low-cost dial-up access to high-speed access through dedicated lines for
individual and corporate customers. Our value-added services include security-related outsourcing
services that protect customers internal networks from unauthorized access and secure remote
connections to internal networks, network-related outsourcing services such as provision,
monitoring and maintenance of network equipment and Virtual Private Network (VPN), and
server-related outsourcing services such as provision of e-mail and web servers and operation and
management of e-mail systems, in addition to Internet data center services. Our systems integration
are tailored to our customers requirements, which include consulting, project planning, systems
design, construction of network systems and systems outsourcing. We also sell a significant amount
of network-related equipment to our systems integration customers as part of our provision of total
network solutions.
Most of our revenues are generated in Japan and are denominated in Japanese yen. The table
below provides a breakdown of the percentage of total revenues among our primary services over the
past three fiscal years.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the fiscal year ended March 31, |
|
|
2005 |
|
2006 |
|
2007 |
Connectivity services |
|
|
34.3 |
% |
|
|
26.7 |
% |
|
|
23.1 |
% |
Value-added services |
|
|
12.0 |
% |
|
|
12.5 |
% |
|
|
13.0 |
% |
Systems integration |
|
|
38.0 |
% |
|
|
47.2 |
% |
|
|
53.5 |
% |
The variety of Internet connectivity services, value-added services and systems integration we
offer enables our customers to purchase all of their Internet-related services and products through
a single source. To support our services and for the convenience of our customers, we also offer a
variety of hardware, software and other products, such as network equipment, which are sourced
mostly from third-party vendors. We aim to be the leading supplier of total network solutions in
Japan.
We have created an Internet network that extends throughout Japan by leasing lines from
telecommunications carriers. Our backbone is one of the highest capacity Internet backbones in
Japan. As of July 3, 2007, we operated 12 points of presence (POPs) for dedicated access, 17 POPs
for dial-up access and 13 Internet data centers. POPs are the main points at which our customers
connect to our backbone, throughout Japan. Our policy on the management of our backbone is that we
upgrade the bandwidth depending on demand and with maximum cost effectiveness. Our backbone network
also extends to the United States, with a total capacity of 7.2 Gbps (3 STM-16 trunk lines) as of
July 3, 2007.
Total network solutions
We are a provider of total network solutions. We provide our customers with tailored,
end-to-end Internet and private network solutions. The diversity of services we offer permits each
customer to purchase individual services or a bundle of services that we believe provide the most
efficient, reliable and cost-effective solution for that customers particular needs.
The primary resources that we use to provide total network solutions to our customers include:
|
|
|
our Internet connectivity services, |
16
|
|
|
our line-up of value-added services, including security, network and server-related
outsourcing, |
|
|
|
|
our Internet data center services, |
|
|
|
|
our systems integration, including ongoing consulting, systems design,
construction, operation and management, and |
|
|
|
|
other network and application services that our group companies provide. |
Our total network solutions for business users are a primary focus of our business. We consult
with businesses and other customers to identify their particular needs. We then draw upon our
extensive resources to address those needs.
Internet Connectivity Services
We offer two categories of Internet connectivity services: dedicated access services and
dial-up access services. Dedicated access services are based mainly on dedicated local-line
connections provided by carriers between our backbone and customers. Dial-up access services mainly
require customers to connect to our POPs through the publicly-switched telephone network. The
Internet connectivity part of our total network solutions ranges from low-cost, entry-level dial-up
connections from home personal computers to customized wide-area network solutions deploying a
range of the dedicated and dial-up services listed below to connect headquarters, data centers,
branch offices and mobile personnel. Currently, large telecommunications carriers such as Nippon
Telegraph and Telephone East Corporation (NTT East) and Nippon Telegraph and Telephone West
Corporation (NTT West) and other providers are rapidly increasing the variety of last-mile access
with ADSL, fiber optic and Ethernet-based lines. Such new lines provide inexpensive high-speed,
high-capacity last mile access, and we continue to introduce new variations to our Internet
connectivity service to accommodate such developments.
The following table shows the number of our Internet connectivity service subscribers as of
the dates indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of March 31, |
|
|
2003 |
|
2004 |
|
2005 |
|
2006 |
|
2007 |
Dedicated access service contracts: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
IP service: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Low Bandwidth (64 kbps 768 kbps) |
|
|
147 |
|
|
|
93 |
|
|
|
89 |
|
|
|
85 |
|
|
|
64 |
|
Medium Bandwidth (1 Mbps 99 Mbps) |
|
|
473 |
|
|
|
565 |
|
|
|
660 |
|
|
|
654 |
|
|
|
687 |
|
High Bandwidth (100 Mbps ) |
|
|
43 |
|
|
|
80 |
|
|
|
114 |
|
|
|
157 |
|
|
|
224 |
|
Total IP Service |
|
|
663 |
|
|
|
738 |
|
|
|
863 |
|
|
|
896 |
|
|
|
975 |
|
IIJ T1 Standard and IIJ Economy |
|
|
939 |
|
|
|
504 |
|
|
|
276 |
|
|
|
109 |
|
|
|
45 |
|
IIJ Data Center Connectivity Service |
|
|
156 |
|
|
|
196 |
|
|
|
231 |
|
|
|
247 |
|
|
|
282 |
|
IIJ FiberAccess/F and IIJ DSL/F
(Broadband Services) |
|
|
3,550 |
|
|
|
5,788 |
|
|
|
9,873 |
|
|
|
13,297 |
|
|
|
16,418 |
|
|
|
|
Total dedicated access service contracts |
|
|
5,308 |
|
|
|
7,226 |
|
|
|
11,243 |
|
|
|
14,549 |
|
|
|
17,720 |
|
Dial-up access service contracts: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Under IIJ Brand |
|
|
86,183 |
|
|
|
75,136 |
|
|
|
68,068 |
|
|
|
62,176 |
|
|
|
57,480 |
|
OEM |
|
|
443,601 |
|
|
|
620,731 |
|
|
|
625,908 |
|
|
|
568,307 |
|
|
|
476,483 |
|
|
|
|
Total dial-up access service contracts |
|
|
529,784 |
|
|
|
695,867 |
|
|
|
693,976 |
|
|
|
630,483 |
|
|
|
533,963 |
|
As of July 3, 2007, we mainly offer the following Internet connectivity services.
17
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pricing |
Service Type |
|
Summary Description |
|
(excluding consumption tax) |
Dedicated access services |
|
|
|
|
IP Service
|
|
Full-scale
dedicated line
service with
high-speed access
for businesses and
other network
operators with
demanding bandwidth
requirements.
|
|
Setup and monthly fees
vary according to carrier,
line speed, line type and
distance involved. |
IIJ T1 Standard
|
|
Packaged dedicated
line service
offering 1.5 Mbps
connection (no
longer promoted).
|
|
Initial setup fee of
¥50,000. Monthly access
fee of ¥117,000 for up to
8 IP addresses and
¥167,000 for up to 16 IP
addresses. |
IIJ Economy
|
|
Service for
dedicated line
access to the
Internet with
inexpensive monthly
fees primarily for
small- and
medium-sized
businesses and
local and regional
offices of
corporate groups
(no longer
promoted).
|
|
Initial setup fee of
¥40,000. Monthly access
fees of ¥38,000 for 64
kbps service and ¥45,000
for 128 kbps service. |
IIJ Data Center Connectivity Service
|
|
Full-scale
dedicated line
service for
customers hosted in
IIJ Data Centers,
with asymmetrical
speeds of upstream
(from the Internet
to data center) and
downstream (from
the data center to
the Internet)
transmissions.
|
|
Initial setup fee of
¥100,000. Monthly fees
range from ¥400,000 to
¥10,000,000, depending on
the speed of upstream
transmissions. |
IIJ FiberAccess/F
|
|
Service for
dedicated line
Internet-access
using optical lines
at speeds of up to
10 Mbps or 100
Mbps, targeted
primarily at small-
and medium-sized
enterprises
requiring
high-capacity,
high-speed
transmissions.
Optical fiber
access is limited
to FLETS lines
provided by NTT
East and West.
|
|
Initial setup fee of
¥50,000. Monthly fees
range from ¥14,000 to
¥190,000, depending on the
speed of connection and
the number of IP addresses
allocated. Monthly fees do
not include optical line
charges, which are paid
directly by the customer
to the optical line
provider. |
IIJ DSL/F
|
|
Service for
dedicated line
Internet-access
using ADSL lines at
speeds of up to 47
Mbps, targeted
primarily at small-
and medium-sized
offices and home
offices. ADSL
access is limited
to FLETS lines
provided by NTT
East and West.
|
|
Initial setup fee of
¥30,000. Monthly fees
range from ¥9,800 to
¥49,800, depending on the
number of allocated IP
addresses. Monthly charges
do not include ADSL
charges, which are paid
directly by the customer
to the ADSL service
provider. |
IIJ DSL/A
|
|
Service for
dedicated line
Internet-access
using ADSL lines at
speeds of up to 47
Mbps, targeted
primarily at small-
and medium-sized
offices and home
offices. ADSL
access is limited
to ADSL services
provided by ACCA
Networks, Co., Ltd.
|
|
Initial setup fee of
¥75,000. Monthly fees
range from ¥12,000 to
¥52,000, depending on the
number of allocated IP
addresses. Monthly charges
do not include ADSL
charges, which are paid
directly by the customer
to the ADSL service
provider. |
18
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pricing |
Service Type |
|
Summary Description |
|
(excluding consumption tax) |
|
|
(ACCA Networks) |
|
|
IIJ ISDN/F
|
|
Service for
dedicated line
Internet-access
using ISDN lines at
speeds of up to 64
kbps, targeted
primarily at small-
and medium-sized
offices and home
offices where ADSL
lines are not
available. ISDN
access is limited
to FLETS lines
provided by NTT
East and West.
|
|
Initial setup fee of
¥5,000. Monthly fees range
from ¥4,800 to ¥6,800,
depending on the number of
allocated IP addresses.
Monthly charges do not
include ISDN charges,
which are paid directly by
customers to ISDN
providers. |
IIJ Line Management/F
|
|
Service for us to
prepare optical
fiber or ADSL
access provided by
NTT East and West
for IIJ
FiberAccess/F, IIJ
DSL/F and IIJ
ISDN/F on behalf of
customers. We
provide customer
support functions
for the access
lines.
|
|
Initial setup fee range
from ¥5,000 to ¥43,400.
Monthly fees range from
¥2,300 to ¥44,700,
depending on the optional
services. |
Dial-up access services |
|
|
|
|
IIJ Dial-up Standard
|
|
Service for
corporate users
permitting
simultaneous
Internet-access
from several
dial-up lines under
a single contract.
|
|
Initial setup fee of
¥5,000. Monthly basic fee
of ¥2,000 plus access
charges of ¥10 per minute. |
Enterprise Dial-up IP Service |
|
Service for
corporate users
offering multiple
dial-up accounts at
a fixed monthly
fee.
|
|
Initial setup fee of
¥20,000. Monthly basic
fees range from ¥3,000 to
¥4,900 per account
depending on the number of
accounts. |
IIJ Dial-up Advanced
|
|
Service for
corporate users
offering bundled
low-cost dial-up
accounts.
|
|
Initial setup fee of
¥5,000. Monthly basic fee
of ¥10,000 for the first
50 e-mail accounts
including the first two
hours access per account,
plus ¥5 per minute after
two hours. |
IIJ4U
|
|
Service for
individual users,
which includes
Internet-access and
5 megabytes of disk
space for personal
Web pages and
e-mail account
options for
multiple users.
Various access
options such as
ISDN, ADSL and
optical fiber
access are
available.
|
|
This service does not
charge an initial setup
fee. Monthly service fee
of ¥800 for the first
eight hours and a charge
of ¥5 per minute, with a
ceiling of ¥4,100. |
IIJmio DSL/DF Service
|
|
Service for
individual users
offering Internet
connectivity over
ADSL at speeds of
up to 47 Mbps. ADSL
access is limited
to FLETS lines
provided by NTT
East and West. The
IP address is
changed every time
a connection
|
|
No initial setup fee.
Monthly charge is ¥1,400.
Monthly charges do not
include ADSL charges,
which are paid directly by
the customer to NTT East
and West. |
19
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pricing |
Service Type |
|
Summary Description |
|
(excluding consumption tax) |
|
|
is made. |
|
|
IIJmio FiberAccess/DF Service
|
|
Service for
individual users
offering Internet
connectivity over
optical fiber
network at maximum
10 Mbps or 100
Mbps. Optical fiber
access is limited
to FLETS lines
provided by NTT
East and West. The
IP address is
changed every time
a connection is
made.
|
|
No initial setup fee.
Monthly charges range from
¥2,000 to ¥7,000. Monthly
charges do not include
optical fiber access
charges, which are paid
directly by the customer
to NTT East and West. |
IIJmio DSL/SF Service
|
|
Service for
individual users
offering Internet
connectivity over
ADSL at speeds of
up to 47 Mbps. ADSL
access is limited
to FLETS lines
provided by NTT
East and West. A
fixed IP address is
provided with this
service.
|
|
No initial setup fee. The
monthly charge is ¥4,800.
Monthly charges do not
include ADSL charges,
which are paid directly by
the customer to NTT East
and West. |
IIJmio FiberAccess/DC Service
|
|
Service for
individual users
offering Internet
connectivity over
optical fiber
network at speeds
of up to 50 Mbps or
100 Mbps. Optical
fiber access is
limited to Access
Commufa lines
provided by Chubu
Telecommunications
Co., Inc.
|
|
No initial setup fee. The
monthly charge is
¥2,000. Monthly
charges do not include
optical fiber access
charges, which are paid
directly by the customer
to Chubu
Telecommunications Co.,
Inc. |
IIJmio FiberAccess/SF Service
|
|
Service for
individual users
offering Internet
connectivity over
optical fiber
network at speeds
of up to 10 Mbps or
100 Mbps. Optical
fiber access is
limited to FLETS
lines provided by
NTT East and West.
A fixed IP address
is provided with
this service.
|
|
No initial setup fee. The
monthly charges range from
¥8,000 to ¥12,000,
depending on the type of
access line. The monthly
charges do not include
optical fiber access
charges, which are paid
directly by the customer
to NTT East and West. |
IIJmio MobileAccess Service
|
|
Service for
individual users
offering mobile
Internet
connectivity
through several
data communications
services provided
by mobile
telecommunication
companies.
|
|
No initial setup fee. The
monthly charge is ¥300 and
does not include service
charges to IIJs access
points, which are paid
directly by the customer
to the mobile
telecommunication
companies. |
Dedicated Access Services
Our lineup of dedicated line access services includes: IP Service, IIJ T1 Standard, IIJ
Economy, IIJ Data Center Connectivity Service, IIJ FiberAccess/F, IIJ DSL/F, IIJ DSL/A, IIJ ISDN/F
and IIJ Line Management/F. The total bandwidth allocated to our dedicated access services has
increased 66.0% to 323.5 Gbps as of March 31, 2007, up from 194.9 Gbps a year earlier.
IP Service. Our IP Service is a full-scale, high-speed access service that connects a
customers network to our network and the Internet. The service is used by corporate customers
mainly for critical purposes, such as Internet connectivity for corporate headquarters or data
centers. As of March 31, 2007, we had 975
20
contracts for our IP Service compared to 896 for our IP Service as of March 31, 2006.
The customer chooses the level of service it needs based upon its bandwidth requirements. As of
July 3, 2007, we offered service at speeds ranging from 64 kbps to 10 Gbps.
Our IP Service revenues, including revenues of IIJ Data Center Connectivity Service,
represented 14.8% of our total revenues for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2007 and 16.6% for the
fiscal year ended March 31, 2006. We believe that as businesses continue to develop Internet
capabilities, this service will continue to be the foundation of our total network solutions
offerings.
Subscribers pay a monthly fee for the leased local access line from the customers location to
one of our POPs. The amount of this fee varies depending on the carrier used and the distance
between the customers site and our POPs. Customers subscribing to greater bandwidths use ATM
(Asynchronous Transfer Mode) or an Ethernet local access line, which supports over 2 Mbps. We
collect the usage fee from the customer and pay this amount to the carrier.
Although fees are charged on a monthly basis, the minimum contract length is one year. For
contracts of at least three years, a 10% per month discount is given.
We also offer various IPv6-capable Internet connectivity services, namely IPv6 Tunnel, IPv6
Native and IPv6/IPv4 Dual Stack Services. In addition to corporate users, IPv6 Tunnel Service has
been available to individual users. IPv6 is the next generation Internet Protocol, which allows
IPv6 technology to overcome the problems, such as limited IP address availability, of IPv4, the
protocol generally used. IPv6 Tunnel Service is a service to enable customers to use IPv6
technology via IPv4 access network, by encapsulating IPv6 data with IPv4 data. IPv6 Native and
IPv6/IPv4 Dual Stack Services are services which provide IPv6 environment to customers without
encapsulating it with IPv4 data. IPv6 technology enables customers to connect a vast range of
electronic appliances and equipment, including cellular phones, AV equipment, car navigation
devices and home electronics. We are the first commercial Internet Service Provider, or ISP in
Japan to offer IPv6 service and our management believes that we will reap first-mover benefits
from our initiative. In an effort to promote the dissemination and use of IPv6, we are not
currently charging service fees for IPv6 Tunnel Service.
For our IP Service, we offer Service Level Agreements to our customers to better define the
quality of services our customers receive. We were the first ISP in Japan to introduce this type of
agreement.
We guarantee the performance of the following elements under our Service Level Agreements:
|
|
|
100% availability of our network, |
|
|
|
|
the maximum average latency, or time necessary to transmit a signal, between
designated POPs, and |
|
|
|
|
prompt notification of outage or disruption. |
We are able to offer these Service Level Agreements because of the high quality and
reliability of our network. Our Service Level Agreements provide customers with credit against the
amount invoiced for the services if our service quality fails to meet the prescribed standards.
Subscribers to our IP Service receive technical support 24 hours a day and seven days a week.
IIJ T1 Standard. Our IIJ T1 Standard is a connectivity service at 1.5 Mbps that we introduced
in October 1999. It is a packaged dedicated line service limited to static routing and allocations
of 8 or 16 IP addresses. As of March 31, 2007, we had 45 customers for IIJ T1 Standard and IIJ
Economy. We are no
21
longer promoting the service since customers demand for a higher speed than the one that the
service provides.
IIJ Economy. IIJ Economy is a packaged Internet connectivity service via a dedicated line at
64 kbps or 128 kbps, targeting small- and medium-sized businesses. We are no longer promoting the
service since customers demand for a higher speed than the one that the service provides.
IIJ Data Center Connectivity Service. We also provide connectivity services with respect to
our data centers. Our data center connectivity services are an important part of being able to
provide high-quality, high-speed, seamless service to our customers. Our connectivity services are
asymmetric, meaning that transmission speeds are not the same in both directions with the
downstream transmission being faster to accommodate greater amounts of information being accessed
from the Internet versus being sent to the Internet. The fee structure depends on the transmission
capacity required for upstream and downstream transmissions. For downstream transmissions, we offer
either 10BASE-T connectivity (10 Mbps) or 100BASE-T connectivity (100 Mbps). For upstream
transmissions, we offer bandwidths from 1 Mbps to 4 Mbps for 10BASE-T connectivity, and 6 Mbps to
48 Mbps for 100BASE-T connectivity. In addition to the above, we offer IPv6-capable data center
services, which offer the same services using IPv6. As of March 31, 2007, we had 282 Internet data
center connectivity contracts, compared with 247 as of March 31, 2006. We support this service by
providing the same three guarantee elements, availability, maximum average latency and prompt
notification of outage or disruption, as the IP Service above under Service Level Agreements.
IIJ FiberAccess/F. IIJ FiberAccess/F Service is a dedicated Internet-access service that uses
BFLETS fiber optic access lines provided by NTT East and West allowing service at maximum 10
Mbps or 100 Mbps on a best-efforts basis. The service is available in several variations (Business,
Basic, Family, Mansion and others), optimizing each customers needs in speed and connection
interface. Customers can also choose the number of allocated IP addresses from: 1, 4, 8, 16, 32 and
64. We support this service by providing guarantees of latency rates under Service Level
Agreements. As of March 31, 2007, we had 16,418 customers for IIJ FiberAccess/F, IIJ DSL/F, IIJ
DSL/A, IIJ ISDN/F and IIJ Line Management/F.
IIJ DSL/F and IIJ DSL/A. IIJ DSL/F Service provides dedicated line Internet connectivity via
ADSL with speeds of up to 47 Mbps. IIJ DSL/F Service is primarily targeted at small- and
medium-sized offices and home offices that have access to ADSL lines provided by NTT East and West
under the name of FLETS ADSL. We support this service by providing guarantees of latency rates
under Service Level Agreements. In May 2006, we began offering IIJ DSL/A, using ADSL lines provided
by ACCA Networks.
IIJ ISDN/F. IIJ ISDN/F Service provides dedicated line Internet-access via ISDN lines with
speeds of up to 64 kbps. IIJ ISDN/F Service is primarily targeted at small-and medium-sized offices
and home offices where ADSL lines are not available but have access to ISDN lines provided by NTT
East and West under the name of FLETS ISDN.
IIJ Line Management/F. IIJ Line Management/F Service is a service for us to prepare optical
fiber or ADSL lines provided by NTT East and West for IIJ FiberAccess/F, IIJ DSL/F and IIJ ISDN/F
on behalf of customers. We provide customer support functions for the access lines.
Dial-up Access Services
We offer a variety of dial-up access services. Our dial-up access services are an important
resource in offering total Internet solutions to corporate customers. Our dial-up services allow
employees out of the office or frequent travelers to access our network or their own corporate
networks through one of our POPs or through our roaming access points. The dial-up services are
usually provided with VPN function, that is
provided by our value-added services or systems integration to access customers own corporate
network securely. We also offer dial-up access service for individuals and an OEM service (where we
provide
22
services for other companies which sell those services under their own name) for other
network operators.
Our main dial-up access services are our IIJ Dial-up Standard, Enterprise Dial-up IP Service,
IIJ Dial-up Advanced, IIJ4U, IIJmio DSL/DF Service, IIJmio FiberAccess/DF Service, IIJmio DSL/SF
Service, IIJmio FiberAccess/DC Service, IIJmio FiberAccess/SF Service and IIJmio MobileAccess
Service, all as described in the table above. We also provide Terminal-type Dial-up IP Service to
customers, but we are no longer promoting this service.
Value-Added Services
Our customers are increasingly seeking additional network-related services, in addition to
Internet connectivity. We provide our customers with a broad range of value-added services and
products such as security, network, server-related outsourcing services in addition to Internet
data center services. Generally, the service period is for one year and customers are billed
monthly. We recognize revenues for these services on a straight-line basis during the service
period. Any initial set-up fees received in connection with our value-added services are deferred
and recognized over the contract period or estimated average period of estimated to customers.
We believe that business customers will continue to increase their use of the Internet as a
business tool and will increasingly rely on an expanding range of value-added services to enhance
productivity, reduce costs and improve service reliability.
Our value-added services include:
|
|
|
Security-related outsourcing services. As of July 3, 2007, we offer six main
security-related outsourcing services (described below) that protect customers
internal networks from unauthorized access and secure remote connections to internal
networks. We were the first ISP in Japan to provide firewall services, which we
introduced in 1994. |
|
|
|
|
IIJ DDoS Solution Service. In October 2005, we began offering IIJ DDoS
Solution Service to protect customers internal networks from distributed denial of
service (DDoS) attacks, a type of unauthorized access from Internet. The fee depends
on the type of service that we provide and the initial fee starts at ¥650,000 and the
monthly fee starts at ¥498,000. |
|
|
|
|
IIJ Security Scan Service. In March 2002, we began offering IIJ Security
Scan Service, a package of services targeting small- and medium-sized enterprises to
identify security weaknesses in order to prevent illicit access from external networks
and to avert virus infection of in-house servers. It is available in two forms: regular
monthly scans and one-time spot checks. The form of service can be selected to meet the
specific needs of the customer, such as checks for protocol and network configuration
or for vulnerability to specific illegal network intrusion. The service was developed
with NRI Secure Technologies Ltd., a Japanese security assessment and auditing
solutions provider. For the regular monthly scan service, the initial charge is ¥5,000.
The monthly charge for scanning is ¥25,000 for one IP address, and ¥24,000 will be
added for every additional IP address. For the spot scan service, the basic charge for
scanning one IP address is ¥30,000, and ¥29,000 will be added for every additional IP
address. |
|
|
|
|
IIJ Network Intrusion Detection Service. In April 2001, we began offering
IIJ Network Intrusion Detection Service, which offers around-the-clock, non-stop
network monitoring and
intrusion-detection capabilities, as well as packet information for analyzing
detected illicit accesses. The initial cost for the service is ¥300,000, and the
monthly fee starts from ¥300,000, depending on the customers traffic volume. |
23
|
|
|
IIJ Managed IPS Service. In July 2006, we began offering IIJ Managed IPS
Service, which offers around-the-clock, non-stop monitoring of a companys network
using an intrusion prevention system (IPS) to detect unauthorized access on such
companys network in real time and terminate such authorized access. The initial cost
for the service is ¥900,000 and the minimum monthly fee starts from ¥380,000. |
|
|
|
|
IIJ Managed Firewall Service. In October 2006, we began offering IIJ
Managed Firewall Service, which offers around-the-clock, non-stop monitoring of
firewalls with Service Level Agreements, real-time reporting and an anomaly detection
system. The initial cost for the service is ¥100,000 and the minimum monthly fee starts
from ¥50,000. The service replaced our previous firewall services, such as IIJ Security
Premium, IIJ Security Standard and IIJ Security Lite. |
|
|
|
|
IIJ Secure Remote Access. IIJ Secure Remote Access is a packaged service
combining the IIJ Dial-up Advanced with ID Gateway, which controls remote access to
in-house servers protected by firewalls. In addition to the 50 dial-up accounts covered
by the base rate, the service ensures a secure remote environment by controlling
accessible servers and utilization protocols for each dial-up account. In May 2002, IIJ
Secure Remote Access was upgraded by adding a remote VPN function. The upgrade enables
remote users to transmit and receive data with encryption, offering a secure enterprise
network environment with a greater variety of access options, such as connections from
overseas via local ISPs. In June 2005, IIJ Secure Remote Access was upgraded by adding
an Authentication Service Link Option, which enables customers to use a greater variety
of authentication methods. |
|
|
|
|
Network-related outsourcing services. As of July 3, 2007, we offer seven main
network-related outsourcing services (described below), including provision,
monitoring and maintenance of network equipment and VPN to connect customers branch
and remote offices. |
|
|
|
|
IIJ Internet-LAN Service. IIJ Internet-LAN Service is a service which
provides connectivity among a companys branch and remote offices. With this service,
customers can use functions provided by Wide-area Ethernet over the Internet. |
|
|
|
|
IIJ SMF sx Service. IIJ SMF sx Service is a centralized network management
system developed by IIJ based on the SEIL Management Framework (SMF). This system
enables centralized management of network configuration, administration, and
maintenance. We received patent approval in March 2006 for SMF. When a customer at a
remote site connects a router to the circuit, the router is automatically configured
and connected to the network. System integrators utilizing this technology can reduce
configuration and maintenance costs at the remote site. |
|
|
|
|
IIJ Managed VPN PRO Service. IIJ Managed VPN PRO Service is a service
which provides connectivity among a companys branch and remote offices, utilizing SEIL
Series or other routers. |
|
|
|
|
IIJ VPN Standard. IIJ VPN Standard is a service which provides Internet
VPN connectivity among a companys branch and remote offices based on encryption
technology. We no longer promote this service because we provide similar functions with
other services. |
|
|
|
|
SEIL Rental
Service. SEIL Rental Service is a service through which we
rent the SEIL Series, a product developed by IIJ. There are several products depending
on the Wide Area Network (WAN) Interface. Optional services such as fixed format
configuration and on-site maintenance are provided. |
24
|
|
|
Managed Router Service. Managed Router Service provides customers with
router equipment together with maintenance, operation and administration of routers. We
provide SEIL Series routers or CISCO routers depending on customer requirements. |
|
|
|
|
IIJ NetLightning. IIJ NetLightning is a service based on Netli, Inc.s
technology that improves web application performance. By utilizing this service, end
users can access customer websites faster, without any settings, and customers can
thereby reduce the cost of placing mirror sites. We no longer promote this service. |
|
|
|
|
Server-related outsourcing services. As of July 3, 2007, we offer 14 main
server-related outsourcing services (described below), including provision of e-mail
and web services and operation and management of e-mail systems. |
|
|
|
|
IIJ Mail Gateway Service. In November 2002, we renovated IIJ Mail Gateway
Service to expand the service from large corporate customers to other corporate
segments. The service has three options. The first one is virus protection to check the
viruses on incoming and outgoing e-mails. The second one is audit to detect the keyword
set in advance on the outgoing e-mails. The third one is antispam to check spam for
incoming e-mails, which we started to provide in October 2004. Customers can take all
or a selection of the options. The initial cost is ¥10,000, and the monthly fee ranges
from ¥30,000 to ¥70,000 for the first 50 e-mail accounts and an additional fee per
account after the first 50 e-mail accounts ranges from ¥200 to ¥850. |
|
|
|
|
IIJ Post Office Service. IIJ Post Office Service is an e-mail operation
outsourcing service performed by our e-mail server, enabling a customer to allocate and
maintain a number of e-mail accounts under its own domain name for its employees,
members or other relevant users. The customer can administer e-mail accounts online
through our customer support Web interface. In December 2002, we added a virus checking
option for incoming and outgoing e-mails and an audit option to check the content of
outgoing e-mails and suspend the ones containing keywords specified in advance. In
addition, we added a spam checking option which we started to provide in October 2004
for no additional charge to customers contracting the virus checking option or an
audit option. |
|
|
|
|
IIJ Mail Box Service. IIJ Mail Box Service is also an e-mail operation
outsourcing service performed by our e-mail server. Unlike IIJ Post Office Service,
customers do not have to obtain their own domain names. A customer can administer
e-mail accounts online through our customer support Web interface. |
|
|
|
|
E-mail distribution services. We offer other e-mail outsourcing services,
such as services for e-mail distribution to large numbers of e-mail addresses and
mailing list functions. |
|
|
|
|
IIJ Secure MX Service. In September 2006, we started offering IIJ Secure
MX Service which is an Application Service Provider type of service that operates
through an IIJ gateway server established between a customers e-mail system and the
Internet. The service offers comprehensive e-mail security functions including
anti-spam, sender authentication, e-mail transmission route encryption, and full-text
e-mail storage. IIJ support engineers provide 24-
hour, 365-day monitoring of redundant gateway servers located at the data center,
ensuring a safe and stable e-mail environment. |
|
|
|
|
IIJ Web Standard Service. The IIJ Web Standard allows customers to use
their own domain names while providing them with up to 200 megabytes of web hosting
space. By limiting specifications, the pricing of the service is kept to a minimum
¥5,000 per month. Additionally, careful traffic management of the storage space ensures
a high-performance web-server |
25
|
|
|
environment for users is ensured. This service mainly
targets small- and medium-sized enterprises. |
|
|
|
|
Web hosting services. We offer other web hosting services, such as
customized web hosting services and functions to distribute computer files using our
ftp servers. |
|
|
|
|
IIJ Download Site Service. IIJ Download Site Service is a hosting service
dedicated to high-volume content downloads from the Internet. The service started on a
trial basis in November 2001, and the full-fledged service was launched in February
2002. A dedicated hosting server and dedicated bandwidth are established for each
contract to ensure constant stable performance. With disk capacity of 500 megabytes per
contract on our hosting servers, access is provided at a maximum transmission bandwidth
per contract of up to 80 Mbps. The initial charge for the service is ¥50,000. The
monthly charge ranges between ¥60,000 and ¥340,000, depending upon the bandwidth. In
April 2003, we added the option of 1 Gbps maximum transmission speed for an additional
fee. |
|
|
|
|
IIJ URL Filtering Service. IIJ URL Filtering Service is a service enabled
by the use of IIJs proxy server which blocks access to websites deemed inappropriate.
The initial cost for the service is ¥30,000, and the monthly fee is ¥40,000 as a basic
fee plus an additional fee depending on the number of users in the customers internal
network. |
|
|
|
|
IIJ SSL Certificate Management Service. In April 2007, we began offering
IIJ SSL Certificate Management Service which offers a proxy registration service that
performs all actions necessary to acquire and use Secure Socket Layer certificates. The
initial cost for the service is ¥50,000, and the additional fee to acquire the
certificate ranges from ¥75,000 to ¥240,000 depending on which certificate is acquired
and the length of the period for which the certificate is valid. |
|
|
|
|
IIJ Document Exchange Service. This service is an online storage service
with which customers can upload files onto IIJs storage server and share them with
authorized users. The initial cost is ¥40,000 and the monthly fee is ¥20,000, which
includes 1GB of disk space and 50 accounts. The fee for each additional set of 10
accounts is ¥3,000, and each 1GB of additional disk space is ¥10,000 per month. |
|
|
|
|
IIJ DNS Service. We offer domain name related services that consist of
domain name administration services and domain name server outsourcing services. Domain
names such as .jp, .com, .net and .org are available. |
|
|
|
|
Streaming services. We offer Internet streaming services for live
broadcasts over the Internet, as well as streaming server hosting services. |
|
|
|
|
IIJmio Safety Mail Service. IIJmio Safety Mail Service, launched in
December 2001, is a standard e-mail service with an anti-virus function for individual
users. The service employs the InterScan VirusWall developed by Trend Micro
Incorporated, and features POP/SMTP over SSL which provides secure e-mail transmission
by encrypting the e-mail transmission
between the users and our mail server, in addition to SMTP authentication, which
ensures a higher level of encryption and authorization than what is currently available
for general use. In February 2005, we started to provide spam check function without an
additional charge. There is no initial charge for IIJmio Safety Mail Service and the
monthly charge is ¥500. |
|
|
|
|
Internet data center services. Our Internet data center services include three
primary services which are typically bundled together for our customers: IIJ data |
26
|
|
|
center facility services, IIJ data center connectivity services and management and
monitoring services. Our Internet data center facility services are co-location
services which allow companies to house their servers and routers off-site on our
premises. Our Internet data center facilities are leased from third parties such as
NTT Communications and are equipped with robust security systems, 24-hours-a-day
non-stop power supplies and fire extinguishing systems, and have earthquake-resistant
construction and high-speed Internet connectivity with IIJ backbones. We also offer
basic monitoring and maintenance services for the equipment. This service enhances
reliability because we provide 24-hours-a-day monitoring and have specialized
maintenance personnel and facilities. We offer management and monitoring services
tailored to our customers requirements. |
|
|
|
|
Customer support and help desk solutions. We provide comprehensive customer support
and help desk solutions that include network monitoring and trouble-shooting services.
Most of our customer support services are provided as an integral part of other
services we sell. |
|
|
|
|
IP Phone. We began IP Phone service for individual users of IIJ4U and IIJmio in May
2003, and for corporate users who are using IIJs Internet connectivity services
through NTT FLETS network in December 2003. The telephone service is provided via NTT
FLETS network and customers can make telephone calls with other users connected to
NTT FLETS network or legacy telephones by interconnection with the Publicly Switched
Telephone Network, the legacy telephone network. |
Systems Integration
We offer systems integration tailored to our customers requirements, which include
consulting, project planning, systems design, construction of network systems and systems and
operations outsourcing. Our systems integration mainly focus on Internet business systems and
Intranet and Extranet corporate information systems. We have built a strong record in various
business fields.
Examples of systems integration are:
|
|
|
connecting over a hundred locations such as gas stations, bank branches and
retail shops via Internet-VPN, transmission of data over the Internet with an
encryption feature and our proprietary SEIL Series routers and SMF, |
|
|
|
|
outsourcing of large scale e-mail servers or systems to detect or delete
e-mails with viruses or spam or record all of e-mails incoming to and outgoing
from customers, |
|
|
|
|
online brokerage systems for securities firms, |
|
|
|
|
outsourcing of websites for online businesses, |
|
|
|
|
re-construction of overall corporate network systems suited to increased traffic data, |
|
|
|
|
voice over IP systems to transmit voice among customer branch offices over Internet, |
|
|
|
|
construction of wireless local area network (LAN), and |
|
|
|
|
consultation on corporate network security. |
27
The fee structure of our systems integration is based upon the complexity and scale of the
project. We bill our customers for these services on a fixed-fee basis and recognize the revenue
when the network systems and equipment are delivered and accepted by the customer. Maintenance,
monitoring and operating service revenues are recognized ratably over the separate contract period,
which is generally for one year.
In the planning phase of a systems integration project, we form special project management
teams formulated for every new assignment from the customer. We analyze and design the customers
network and systems with three engineering focuses: reliability, flexibility and extendibility.
In the network systems construction phase, we procure equipment such as servers and manage
application development and software programming tasks which are outsourced to third parties.
Network systems construction usually incorporates many of our other connectivity and value-added
services.
In the operation phase, by utilizing data center facilities directly linked to our network, we
provide a range of outsourcing services, which take maximum advantage of the Internet system,
network operation and management know-how of the IIJ Group companies. Rather than simply looking
after the customers content, we take care of the customers entire computing environment and
provide around-the-clock operation and management services, as well as custom-designed monitoring
systems. These outsourcing services enable customers to free themselves from the burden of
operating the network systems, which demands professional operation and maintenance to ensure
prompt and flexible responses to unexpected system problems.
We also provide our customers with basic, easy-to-order systems integration, which we refer to
as IBPS, including provision of network resources such as network equipment, data storage systems,
network monitoring and systems operation management, on demand and on a monthly basis, therefore
enabling our customers to launch their internal network system securely and cost effectively.
Equipment Sales
In addition to the Internet connectivity and value-added services and systems integration, we
sell our network equipment for connection to the Internet and usage of additional features, which
was developed in-house.
SEIL Series. We started to sell our high-end routers SEIL Series, which was developed
in-house, in October 2001 through sales agents. The series includes four types, SEIL/Turbo,
SEIL/plus, SEIL/neu 128 and SEIL DOCK 2. SEIL/Turbo has a high throughput and enhanced VPN features
and is placed in customers main office or data center when a customer connects its branch and
remote offices. SEIL/plus is suitable for broadband connection and is placed mainly in customers
branch and remote offices. SEIL/neu 128 is suitable for ISDN or 64 k/128 kbps leased line based
Internet connection. SEIL DOCK 2 is equipment to provide a back-up feature to customers. By
combining SEIL/Turbo and other SEIL Series routers, we are able to provide Internet-VPN solutions
connecting corporate branches and remote offices of medium and small enterprises. In addition, we
provide rental services for these routers directly to customers.
We also sell third-party equipment to meet the one-stop needs of our customers.
Network
Our network is one of our most important assets. We have developed and currently operate a
high-capacity network that has been designed to provide reliable, high-speed, high-quality Internet
connectivity services.
We are able to achieve and maintain high speeds through our advanced network architecture,
routing technology and load balancing that optimize traffic on our multiple Internet connections.
28
The primary components of our network are:
|
|
|
our backbone, which includes leased lines and network equipment, such as advanced
Internet routers, |
|
|
|
|
Points of Presence (POPs) in major metropolitan areas in Japan, |
|
|
|
|
Internet data centers, and |
|
|
|
|
a network operations center (NOC). |
Backbone
Leased lines
Our network is anchored by our extensive Internet backbone in Japan and between Japan and the
United States. As of July 3, 2007, we had a total capacity of 7.2 Gbps between Japan and the United
States. We use our expertise in developing and operating our network to organize and connect these
leased lines to form a backbone that has substantial transmission capacity.
We lease high-capacity, high-speed digital transmission lines in Japan from various carriers.
The table below shows our backbone cost.
Backbone Cost
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the fiscal year ended March 31, |
|
|
2003 |
|
2004 |
|
2005 |
|
2006 |
|
2007 |
Backbone cost (thousand yen) |
|
¥ |
5,235,517 |
|
|
¥ |
4,719,638 |
|
|
¥ |
3,550,885 |
|
|
¥ |
3,516,322 |
|
|
¥ |
3,515,934 |
|
Network upgrades
As a policy, we put a high priority to maintain the quality of our networks and continuously
examine the necessity of upgrades of our networks.
Network equipment
We use advanced equipment in our network. Our primary routers in our network are Cisco
routers. The size of our routers varies depending on the number of customers and volume of traffic
served by our POPs. At each POP we connect our dedicated line and dial-up access routers to Cisco
backbone routers which then transmit and receive information throughout our network. We primarily
lease our network equipment under capital lease arrangements.
Points of Presence. POPs are the main points at which our customers connect to our backbone.
We provide Internet connectivity from our POPs to commercial and residential customers through
leased lines and dial-up connections over local exchange facilities. As of July 3, 2007, we had 12
primary POPs which allow for dedicated access and include the main Internet backbone routers that
form our network. As of the same date, we also had 17 POPs for dial-up access. The number of POPs
for dial-up access include one POP that can be accessed from anywhere in Japan with the minimum
local telephone charge.
Many of our POPs are located in, or in close physical proximity to, carrier hotels. Carrier
hotels are facilities where we and other major carriers and ISPs have POPs. These are mainly
located at facilities of various carriers in Japan like NTT Communications and KDDI Corporation
(KDDI). We lease the physical
29
space from these carriers or use such space under other
arrangements with terms ranging from one to two years and terminable by either party on three to
six months notice. We maintain our routers and other networking equipment at these POPs. Our POPs
are in, or in close proximity to, the same buildings in which the switches and routers of these
carriers and ISPs are located enabling quick and easy interconnection of our equipment with theirs.
Internet Data Centers. We operate 13 Internet data centers which we use to offer our
value-added data center services, four in Tokyo, two in Yokohama, and one each in Osaka, Sapporo,
Sendai, Kawaguchi, Nagoya, Kyoto and Fukuoka. These data centers are specifically designed for
application hosting, co-location services and high capacity access to our networks. These data
centers are mainly leased from NTT Communications, ITOCHU Techno-Solutions Corporation, and KDDI.
These data centers have 24-hours-a-day, seven-days-a-week operations and security and are
equipped with uninterruptible power supplies and backup generators, anti-seismic damage
precautions, fire suppression equipment and other features to optimize our ability to offer
high-quality services through these data centers.
In addition, we have invested in data center development outside Japan. We have entered into
the i-Heart joint venture with Samsung Corp., which operates in Korea with a total investment by
us of ¥89 million in May 2000.
Network operations center and technical and customer support. Our NOC in Tokyo operates 24
hours a day and seven days a week. From our NOC, we monitor the status of our network, the traffic
on the network, the network equipment and components and many other aspects of our network
including our customers dedicated access lines leased from carriers. From our NOC, we monitor our
networks to ensure that we meet our commitments under our Service Level Agreements.
Our Group Companies
We offer our services directly and together with our group companies. Our group companies work
closely together in providing total network solutions to our customers. We collaborate on the
development of various services and products and market our services and products together as a
group. However, our group companies specialize in different aspects of the Internet and networking.
Our customers main point of contact is IIJ itself. We then draw upon the resources and special
capabilities of the group companies to offer total Internet solutions.
The table below sets out our group companies, including our subsidiaries and principal equity
method investees and our direct and indirect ownership of each of them as of July 6, 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proportion of ownership |
Company Name |
|
and voting interest |
IIJ Technology Inc. |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
IIJ America Inc. |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
Net Care, Inc. |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
IIJ Financial Systems Inc. |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
Net Chart Japan Inc. |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
hi-ho, Inc. |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
GDX Japan, K.K |
|
|
51.0 |
% |
Internet Multifeed Co. |
|
|
30.0 |
% |
Internet Revolution Inc. |
|
|
30.0 |
% |
Taihei Computer Co., Ltd. |
|
|
45.0 |
% |
30
IIJ Technology Inc.
IIJ-Tech is an important element in our provision of total network solutions to our customers.
IIJ-Tech is incorporated under the laws of Japan. IIJ-Tech provides comprehensive network systems
integration and consulting services, focusing on design, operation, and consulting for corporate
networks and their security systems. IIJ-Tech assists customers in creating private IP networks,
such as Intranets or virtual private networks, that securely isolate internal network traffic from
public Internet traffic and provide each site on the private IP network access to other sites as
well as to the Internet. IIJ-Tech can integrate an organizations multiple sites in different
locations in Japan.
In October 2005, IIJ-Tech issued 1,235 new shares of common stock to IIJ-MC, our former
consolidated subsidiary, when a portion of IIJ-MCs business was transferred to IIJ-Tech. As IIJ-MC
was merged into us, the new shares of IIJ-Tech were succeeded to us and our ownership increased
from 69.0% to 72.1%.
On May 11, 2007, we made IIJ-Tech wholly owned through a share exchange. Before the share
exchange, our ownership in IIJ-Tech increased to 95.2% as of April 5, 2007 through our purchase of
IIJ-Tech shares from IIJ-Techs minority shareholders.
IIJ-Tech had revenues of approximately ¥22,515 million for the fiscal year ended March 31,
2007. As of March 31, 2007, IIJ-Tech had 297 full-time employees, and 25 were seconded from us.
IIJ America Inc.
IIJ America Inc. (IIJ-A) is a U.S.-based ISP, catering mostly to U.S.-based operations of
Japanese companies. IIJ-A is incorporated under the laws of the state of California.
Reflecting the fact that IIJ-Tech, IIJ-As minority shareholder, became wholly owned by us on
May 11, 2007, IIJ-A became our wholly owned consolidated subsidiary in indirect ownership.
IIJ-A had revenues of $10,089 thousand for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006. As of
March 31, 2007, IIJ-A had 16 employees, 5 of whom were seconded from us.
Net Care, Inc.
Net Care provides a broad array of support services, from monitoring and troubleshooting to
network operations and an end-user help desk.
On April 27, 2006, our Board of Directors approved purchase of 450 shares of Net Care from its
minority shareholders. We purchased the shares on April 28, 2006. As a result, our ownership
increased from 57.0% to 59.3%.
On May 11, 2007, we made Net Care a wholly owned subsidiary through a share exchange. Before
the share exchange, our ownership in Net Care increased to 92.5% as of April 5, 2007 through our
purchase of Net Care shares from Net Cares minority shareholders.
Net Care had revenues of approximately ¥2,762 million for the fiscal year ended March 31,
2007. As of March 31, 2007, Net Care had 173 employees, 12 of whom were seconded from us.
31
IIJ Financial Systems Inc.
IIJ Financial Systems Inc. (IIJ-FS) is a company wholly owned by IIJ-Tech, whose business
was acquired from Yamatane Co., Ltd. in October 2004. IIJ-FS provides integration and operation of
security systems.
IIJ-FS became our wholly owned consolidated subsidiary through indirect ownership due to the
fact that it is wholly owned by IIJ-Tech and IIJ-Tech became our wholly owned subsidiary on May 11,
2007.
IIJ-FS had revenues of ¥3,429 million for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2007. As of March
31, 2007, IIJ-FS had 77 employees.
Net Chart Japan Inc.
NCJ was established on August 10, 2006 as a company wholly owned by us for ¥110 million. NCJ
commenced its business operations after it succeeded the business operations of Net Chart Japan
Corporation on October 1, 2006 for ¥75 million. NCJ provides network construction services that are
mainly related to Local Area Networks, such as installation and configuration of equipment, wiring
following network installation, and installation and operation support for applications.
NCJ had revenues of ¥775 million for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2007 since its
establishment in August 2007. As of March 31, 2007, NCJ had 32 employees.
hi-ho Inc.
hi-ho is a company wholly owned by us. In June 2007, we acquired 100% of the equity of hi-ho
from PNS to take over PNSs Internet service business for personal users and its solution business
for its corporate customers. We acquired the equity of hi-ho for ¥1,200 million.
GDX Japan, K.K.
In
April 2007, we and GDX Network, Inc., a company incorporated in the United States, established
a joint venture company, GDX, to provide a message exchange network service in Japan. We invested
¥300 million in GDX and GDX became our consolidated subsidiary.
Internet Multifeed Co.
Internet Multifeed Co. (Multifeed) provides location and facilities for directly connecting
high-speed Internet backbones with content servers to make distribution on the Internet more
efficient. Multifeed is incorporated under the laws of Japan. Its technology was developed jointly
with the NTT Group. Multifeed launched new IX (Internet eXchange where major ISPs exchange
network traffic) services named JPNAP in Tokyo in May 2001 and expanded the service to Osaka in
December 2001.
Multifeed had revenues of ¥2,839 million for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2007. As of March
2007, Multifeed had 24 full-time employees, and 4 employees were seconded from us.
Internet Revolution Inc.
On February 1, 2006, we and Konami Corporation established a joint venture company, i-revo, to
operate comprehensive sites. We invested ¥750 million in i-revo. We account i-revo as an equity method investee in our consolidated financial statements.
32
i-revo had revenues of approximately ¥1,211 million for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2007.
As of March 31, 2007, i-revo had 43 employees, 12 of whom was seconded from us.
Taihei Computer Co., Ltd.
In
July 2007, we invested ¥235 million in TCC, a subsidiary of
one of the subsidiaries of Hirata Corporation, which manages customer loyalty reward program
systems. As a result of this investment, TCC became our equity method investee.
Capital Expenditures
The table below shows our capital expenditures, which we define as amounts paid for purchases
of property and equipment plus acquisition of assets by entering into capital leases, for the last
three years.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the fiscal year ended March 31, |
|
|
2005 |
|
2006 |
|
2007 |
|
|
(millions of yen) |
Capital
expenditures,
including capitalized
leases (1) |
|
¥ |
5,011 |
|
|
¥ |
4,762 |
|
|
¥ |
3,953 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Further information regarding capital expenditures, including capitalized leases and a
reconciliation to the most directly comparable U.S. GAAP financial measure, can be found in Item
3.A., Selected Financial Data Reconciliations of the Disclosed Non-GAAP Financial Measures to
the Most Directly Comparable GAAP Financial Measures. |
Our future capital expenditures are difficult to predict given the rapid changes and
uncertainties in our business environment. Most of our capital expenditures relate to the expansion
and improvement of our existing network, including the installation of the routers and servers
necessary to offer services on our network.
We have not made any material divestitures in the current or past three fiscal years. We
recorded losses on disposal of property and equipment of ¥144 million, ¥119 million and ¥151
million for the fiscal years ended March 31, 2005, 2006 and 2007, respectively. The loss for the
fiscal year ended March 31, 2005 was mainly due to disposal of back-office systems and telephone
rights. The loss for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2006 was mainly due to disposal of software,
such as for back-office systems. The loss for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2007 was mainly due
to the disposal of software, such as back-office systems and network equipment related to the
closing of a network operation center.
Seasonality
See Item 5.D., Trend Information Factors Affecting Our Future Financial Results Systems
integration revenues, including related equipment sales revenues.
Sales and Marketing
Our sales headquarters are in Tokyo. In addition, we have ten branch offices in Osaka, Nagoya,
Fukuoka, Sapporo, Sendai, Toyama, Hiroshima, Yokohama, Toyota and Okinawa in order to cover the
major metropolitan areas in which the majority of large Japanese companies operate. As of March 31,
2007, we had approximately 130 people working in sales and marketing.
We organize our sales personnel into four distinct, separate departments: the Sales
Department, the Product Marketing Department, the Operation Management and Coordination Division,
and Strategic Sales.
33
Also, our Sales Department is divided into four divisions:
|
|
|
Three divisions focus on our total network solutions and work with large corporate
clients, including telecommunications carriers and ISPs, financial institutions,
manufacturers, government institutions, universities and other schools, or focus on
the expansion of sales agents for our services and network equipment. In order to
provide total network solutions, personnel in our sales divisions work closely with
other IIJ Group companies such as IIJ-Tech as well as with other important service
providers. |
|
|
|
|
One division focuses on total network solutions and works with governmental
institutions. |
Our Product Marketing Department mainly makes and conducts promotion plans on our products and
services. Our Operation Management and Coordination Division handles administrative issues.
Strategic Sales is responsible for the planning and management on the sales figures, processes and
other information.
Customers
We have approximately 6,500 business and other institutional customers and approximately
530,000 individual subscribers, which includes individuals subscribing to OEM services, as of March
31, 2007. Our main customers continue to be major corporations, including ISPs.
Research and Development
We have always focused on advancing the use of networking technologies, including the
Internet, in Japan. Many of our engineers are regularly engaged in
the research and development activities related to Internet Protocol
Version 6 (IPv6), e-mail related technologies and network traffic
analysis. These engineers have continued to develop innovative services,
applications and products, many of which have set the standard for the Internet industry in Japan.
In addition to our efforts to develop innovative services, we have engaged in the research and
development of new basic technology since the establishment of IIJ Research Laboratory in 1998.
Our research and development expenses averaged less than 1.0% of total revenues for the past
three consecutive years. For the fiscal years ended March 31, 2005, 2006 and 2007, our research and
development expenses were ¥199 million, ¥158 million and ¥177 million, respectively, most of which
was personnel expense. The level of research and development expenditures is low in relation to our
total costs primarily because we do not engage in extensive research and development of new
technologies and products that require large investments. Rather, as noted above and as set forth
in more detail below, we are intensively engaged in research and development related to our ongoing
business. We focus on monitoring developments in the industry and in developing new and innovative
services and applications by using and modifying existing technologies and products.
As of March 31, 2007, we had 8 people in IIJ Research Laboratory. Our research and development
staff works very closely with our sales and marketing personnel and technical engineers to ensure
that our research and development efforts are closely aligned with the demands of our customers.
Research and Development Organization
We have organized our research and development staff to promptly and effectively address the
rapidly changing technological environment of the Internet. Research and development on practical
applications of new and developing technologies is the responsibility of the Applied Research and
Development Department.
34
IIJ Research Laboratory. We established the IIJ Research Laboratory in April 1998 to engage in
the research and development of new basic network technologies. Through the IIJ Research
Laboratory, we participate in various research and development activities in cooperation with
organizations from the private and academic sectors to promote the deployment and implementation of
IPv6. IIJ Research Laboratory is also engaged in the research and
development activities related to e-mail technologies and network
traffic analysis.
Applied Research and Development Department. Applied Research and Development Department
engages in the research and development of technologies to be applied to our services and
solutions, collects information on, evaluates on the new technology and conducts business expansion
based on the technology IIJ Research Laboratory developed.
Research and Development Strategy
Our primary research and development objective is to continue to develop innovative services,
applications and products that will meet the current and future demands of our customers and that
will continue to be at the forefront of the Internet industry in Japan. In furtherance of this
objective, our research and development efforts currently are focused on a variety of projects,
including:
|
|
|
continued improvement of our SEIL router and SMF, systems
which we developed specifically to be integrated into IIJs network-related services, |
|
|
|
|
research relating to the methodology of configuration of routers and other servers, |
|
|
|
|
research relating to behavior of Internet routing systems, |
|
|
|
|
software development for management of border gateway protocol, or BGP, which is
protocol that allows routers to exchange routing information on the TCP/IP network, |
|
|
|
|
research for Internet traffic monitoring and management, |
|
|
|
|
development of software and evaluation of hardware relating to improving the
operations of routers located on our customers premises, and |
|
|
|
|
research and development of IPSec, which is a secure version of IP that provides
secure communication channels over the Internet. |
A second research and development objective is to continue participating in or otherwise
closely monitoring the new products, developments and initiatives of manufacturers and
standards-setting and research groups. Through these efforts, we seek to ensure that we have timely
and effective access to new technologies and that we implement these technologies effectively.
Because the rate of change in technology relevant to our business is so rapid, we believe that the
sophistication and experience of our research and development personnel is an important part of our
success.
Proprietary Rights
Although we believe that our success is more dependent upon our technical, marketing and
customer service expertise than our proprietary rights, we rely on a combination of trademark and
contractual restrictions to establish and protect our technology.
35
Licenses
For us to provide certain services to our customers, we have been a licensee under agreements
with other suppliers, such as Check Point Software Technologies Ltd., WatchGuard Technologies,
Inc., Trend Micro Incorporated, RSA Security Inc., NRI Secure Technologies, Ltd. and MX Logic, Inc.
We have purchased licenses from the companies in accordance with customer demands for our
services.
Trademarks
We have applied for trademark registrations of our corporate name, Internet Initiative Japan
Inc. and certain other corporate and product names in Japan, the United States and certain
European countries. As of July 3, 2007, 46 registrations have been granted, with 6 pending
applications.
Patents
We have applied for patent registrations in relation to our technology in Japan and the
United States. As of July 3, 2007, 4 registrations have been granted, with 8 pending applications.
The latest acquired patent is for centralized network management system originally developed by us
and is implemented in one of our competitive services, SMF (SEIL Management Framework).
Legal Proceedings
We are involved in normal claims and other legal proceedings in the ordinary course of
business. Except as noted below, we are not involved in any litigation or other legal proceedings
that, if determined adversely to us, we believe would individually or in the aggregate have a
material adverse effect on us or our operations.
In December 2001, a class action complaint alleging violations of the federal securities laws
was filed against the Company, naming the Company, certain of its officers and directors as
defendants, and underwriters of the Companys initial public offering. Similar complaints have been
filed against over 300 other issuers that have had initial public offerings since 1998 and such
actions have been included in a single coordinate proceeding in the Southern District of New York.
An amended complaint was filed on April 24, 2002 alleging, among other things, that the
underwriters of the Companys initial public offering violated the securities laws (i) by failing
to disclose in the offerings registration statement certain alleged compensation arrangements
entered into with the underwriters clients, such as undisclosed commissions or tie in agreements
to purchase stock in the after market, and (ii) by engaging in manipulative practices to
artificially inflate the price of the Companys stock in the after market subsequent to the initial
public offering. On July 15, 2002, the Company joined in an omnibus motion to dismiss the amended
complaint filed by the issuers and individuals named in the various coordinated cases. On February
19, 2003, the Court ruled on the motions to dismiss. The Court granted the Companys motion to
dismiss the claims against it under Rule 10b-5 promulgated under the Exchange Act due to the
insufficiency of the allegations against the Company. The motions to dismiss the claims under
Section 11 of the Securities Act were denied for virtually all of the defendants in the
consolidated cases, including the Company. In June 2003, the Company conditionally approved a
proposed partial settlement with the plaintiffs in this matter. The Company, along with the
settling issuer defendants, filed a motion seeking the courts preliminary approval of the
settlement. The settlement would have provided, among other things, a release of the Company and of
the individual officer and director defendants for the alleged wrongful conduct in the Amended
Complaint in exchange for a guarantee from the Companys insurers regarding recovery from the
underwriter defendants and other non-monetary consideration from the Company. The plaintiffs have
continued to litigate against the underwriter defendants. The District Court directed that the
litigation proceed with a number of focus cases rather than all of the
36
310 cases that have been
consolidated. The Companys case is not one of these focus cases. On October 13, 2004, the district
court certified the focus cases as class actions in the ongoing litigation. The underwriter
defendants appealed that ruling, and on December 5, 2006, the Court of Appeals for the Second
Circuit reversed the district courts class certification decision. On April 6, 2007, the Second
Circuit denied plaintiffs petition for rehearing, and on May 18, 2007, the Second Circuit denied
the plaintiffs petition for rehearing en banc. In light of the Second Circuit opinion, liaison
counsel for all issuer defendants, including the Company, informed the District Court that this
settlement cannot be approved, because the defined settlement class, like the litigation class,
cannot be certified. We cannot predict whether we will be able to renegotiate a settlement that
complies with the Second Circuits mandate. Due to the inherent uncertainties of litigation, we
cannot accurately predict the ultimate outcome of the matter.
Regulation of the Telecommunications Industry in Japan
The Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications (MIC) regulates the Japanese
telecommunications industry. Carriers, including us, are regulated by the MIC primarily under the
Telecommunications Business Law.
The Telecommunications Business Law
The Telecommunications Business Law, which became effective in 1985, was established for the
purpose of privatization and deregulation in telecommunications business. After several amendments,
the Telecommunications Business Law was considerably amended in July 2003. The amendments to the
Telecommunications Business Law, which came into force on April 1, 2004, include, among other
things:
|
|
|
the elimination of the classification of Type I Carriers and Type II Carriers; |
|
|
|
|
deregulation of regulations on charges and terms and conditions for providing
services by Carriers; and |
|
|
|
|
the introduction of certain terminal-equipment-suppliers declaration system
regarding technical standard conformity. |
The Prior Telecommunications Business Law stipulated that the Carriers shall be classified as
either Type I Carrier or Type II Carrier, and imposed regulations in accordance with such
classification of Carriers. Prior Type I Carriers, such as NTT East, NTT West, provided
telecommunications services by establishing their own telecommunications circuit facilities. Prior
Type II Carriers, including us, engaged in the businesses of telecommunications circuit resale and
the provision of Internet services by using the telecommunications facilities of Type I Carriers.
However, from the viewpoint of encouraging telecommunications carriers to carry out diverse
business, etc, the Telecommunications Business Law was amended so as to abolish the classification
of Type I Carriers and Type II Carriers, and thereupon the rules pertaining to services (i.e.,
start-up, abolition, charges and tariffs, etc.) were deregulated in principle while establishing
rules to protect the users, and the rules pertaining to infrastructure were reviewed as necessary
while maintaining the basic framework stipulated under the prior Telecommunications Business Law.
For example, (i) the approval system for business entries and withdrawals was replaced by a
registration/notification system, (ii) regulations pertaining to service offerings, tariff setting
and interconnection between carriers were liberalized, (iii) regulations to protect service users
such as announcement of withdrawal, explanation of important matters on services and swift
processing of complaints were introduced, and (iv) an authorization system allowing priority usage
of public utilities conducive to facilitation of circuit facilities deployment was introduced.
37
The following table summarizes changes by the amendment above in some of the major
regulatory requirements applicable to telecommunications carriers:
(Before Amendment)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Type I Carriers |
|
Type II Carriers |
|
|
|
|
Special Type II |
|
General Type II |
Start-up of services |
|
Permission from MIC required |
|
Registration with MIC required |
|
Notification to MIC required |
Rates and charges |
|
Notification* to MIC required |
|
Notification to MIC required |
|
Unregulated |
Share acquisition
by foreign
investors |
|
Unregulated** |
|
Unregulated |
|
Unregulated |
|
|
|
* |
|
Type I Carriers which operate Category I Designated Telecommunications Facilities are
required to receive MIC approval for their Interconnection charges. |
|
** |
|
Prior notification is required under the Foreign Exchange and Foreign Trade Law. This is not
applicable to purchasers of ADSs. A one-third foreign ownership restriction is applicable only
to NTT (which was changed from a 20% foreign ownership restriction on November 30, 2001). |
(After Amendment)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Telecommunications Carriers |
|
|
Registration required |
|
Registration exempted |
Start-up of services |
|
Registration with MIC required* |
|
Notification to MIC required**** |
Rates and charges |
|
Notification to MIC required** |
|
Unregulated |
Share acquisition
by foreign
investors |
|
Unregulated*** |
|
Unregulated |
Before the amendments to the Telecommunications Business Law, we were classified as a Special
Type II Carrier. After the amendments, we are deemed by the effect of Supplementary Provisions to
the amended Telecommunications Business Law to have filed the notification to MIC under the amended
Telecommunications Business Law. In practice, we filed an actual notification to MIC in April 2004
according to the request of MIC.
|
|
|
* |
|
Applicable to telecommunications carriers which install certain large scale circuit
facilities unless an exemption applies as designated by the applicable ministerial ordinance
of MIC from the viewpoint of the scale of the telecommunications circuit facilities and the
scope of areas where such telecommunications circuit facilities are installed. |
|
** |
|
Applicable to universal services and services which have the control power over the market
provided by the telecommunications carriers which install what is called the bottle-neck
facilities. |
|
|
|
Telecommunications carriers which operate Category I Designated Telecommunications Facilities
are required to receive MIC approval for their Interconnection terms and charges. |
|
*** |
|
Prior notification is required under the Foreign Exchange and Foreign Trade Law for
acquisition of shares of telecommunications carriers to which registration for start-up
services is applicable. This is not applicable to purchasers of ADSs. A one-third foreign
ownership restriction is applicable only to NTT. |
38
|
|
|
**** |
|
Currently, carriers which meet the following two requirements established by the ministerial
ordinance of MIC are exempted from registration with MIC: (i) areas of installation of
terminal-related transmission facilities are limited to only within a single municipal (city,
town or village) and (ii) areas of installation of relay-related transmission facilities are
limited to only within a single prefecture. |
Regulations of telecommunications carriers
The following regulations apply to telecommunications carriers defined in the
Telecommunication Business Law.
Start-up of Services
|
|
|
Carriers with registration |
|
|
|
|
Registration with the MIC required for telecommunications carriers which exceed
criteria established by MICs ordinance in relation to the scale of the
telecommunications circuit facilities and the scope of areas where such
telecommunications circuit facilities are installed. |
|
|
|
|
Other Carriers |
|
|
|
|
Notification to the MIC required for telecommunications carriers other than the above.
We do business under this category. |
Charges and Tariffs
|
|
|
Unregulated, in general. The requirement that standard terms and conditions be
applied equally to all users was repealed. |
|
|
|
|
Prior notification to the MIC required for Basic Telecommunications Services
(universal services such as basic fee, local call and emergency telecommunication
service) and Designated Telecommunications Services (i.e., services which have the
controlling power over the market provided by the telecommunications carriers which
install what is called the bottle-neck facilities). Among the Designated
Telecommunications Services, the telecommunications services to be specified by MIC at
least once a year will be subject to price cap regulations, under which carriers will
be required to obtain approval from the MIC if a proposed change of charge exceeds the
price cap. Providing these telecommunications services other than pursuant to the
terms and conditions notified to the MIC is prohibited, unless minor exceptions apply. |
Articles of Interconnection Agreements
|
|
|
Unregulated, in general. |
|
|
|
|
Approval from the MIC required for Category I Designated Telecommunications Facilities. |
|
|
|
|
Prior notification to the MIC required for Category II Designated
Telecommunications Facilities. |
Telecommunications Facilities of Carriers.
|
|
|
A telecommunications carrier that owns telecommunications circuit facilities must
maintain its telecommunications facilities (except telecommunications facilities
stipulated in MICs ordinances as those having a minor influence on the users benefit in the cases of damage or
|
39
|
|
|
failure thereof) in conformity with the technical standards
provided in the applicable MICs ordinances. Such Carriers shall confirm itself that
said telecommunications facilities are in compliance with such technical standards
specified in the applicable MICs ordinances. |
|
|
|
|
A telecommunications carrier that provides Basic Telecommunications Services must
maintain their telecommunications facilities for provision of their Basic
Telecommunications Services in conformity with the technical standards provided in the applicable MICs
ordinances. |
|
|
|
|
Telecommunications Carriers that own telecommunications circuit facilities or
provide Basic Telecommunications Services must establish their own administrative
rules in accordance with MICs ordinances in order to secure the reliable and stable
provision of telecommunications services. These administrative rules must regulate the
operation and manipulation of telecommunications facilities and the safeguarding,
inspecting and testing regarding the construction, maintenance and administration of
telecommunications facilities, etc. as provided for by the ministerial ordinance of
MIC. Such administrative rules must be submitted to the MIC prior to the commencement
of operations, and changes must be submitted to the MIC after they are implemented
without delay. |
Order to Improve Business Activities
|
|
|
The Minister for MIC may, if it is deemed that business activities of a
telecommunications carrier falls under the inappropriate items set forth in the
Telecommunications Business Law, insofar as necessary to ensure the users benefit or
the public interest, order said telecommunications carrier to take actions to improve
operations methods or other measures. |
Right of Way Privilege for Authorized Carriers
|
|
|
Authorization on the entire or a part of a carriers telecommunications business by
MIC for the privileged use of land or other public utilities for circuit facilities
deployment is required. Right of Way privilege is available to carriers irrespective
of registration. |
Merger, Business Transfer or Divestiture of Carriers
|
|
|
Post facto notification to MIC without delay is required. |
Business Suspension, Abolition or Dissolution of Carriers
|
|
|
Post facto notification to MIC without delay is required. Prior announcement of
withdrawals to service users is required in accordance with MICs ordinance. |
Foreign Capital Participation
|
|
|
Unregulated. Prior notification is required under the Foreign Exchange and Foreign
Trade Law for acquisition of shares of telecommunications carriers to which
registration for start-up services is applicable. This is not applicable to purchasers
of ADSs. The one-third foreign ownership restriction is applicable only to NTT. |
C. Organizational Structure.
The information required by this item is in Our Group Companies above.
40
D. Property, Plants and Equipment.
The information required by this item is in Network above.
Item 4A. Unresolved Staff Comments
None.
Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects.
A. Operating Results.
You should read the following discussion of our financial condition and results of operations
together with Item 3.A. of this annual report on Form 20-F and our consolidated financial
statements and the notes to those financial statements beginning on page F-1 of this annual report.
This discussion and analysis contains forward-looking statements that involve risks, uncertainties
and assumptions. Our actual results may differ materially from those anticipated in these
forward-looking statements as a result of factors including but not limited to those in Item 3.D.
of this annual report on Form 20-F.
Overview
We are a provider of a comprehensive range of Internet connectivity services and network
solution services in Japan. We were founded in December 1992 and began offering Internet
connectivity services commercially in July 1993. We were one of the first commercial ISPs in Japan.
Our primary sources of revenues are connectivity services, value-added services, systems
integration and equipment sales. Connectivity services consist of dedicated Internet-access
services and dial-up Internet-access services. For value-added services, we provide services such
as network security services, mail and web server hosting services, managed router services and
Internet data center services. For systems integration, we provide systems development and
integration for business-to-business and business-to-consumer-networks, and outsourcing projects.
For equipment sales, we provide equipment as part of our provision of total network. Substantially
all of our revenues are from our customers in Japan, and we are the main point of contact for
customers for these various services.
Total revenues were ¥41.7 billion, ¥49.8 billion and ¥57.1 billion for the fiscal years ended
March 31, 2005, 2006 and 2007, respectively. The increases in revenues for each of the two years
ended March 31, 2007 as compared to the previous fiscal years mainly reflect an increase in
value-added services and systems integration revenues.
Operating income for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2007 was ¥3.5 billion, an improvement
from operating income of ¥2.4 billion for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2006 and ¥1.2 billion in
the fiscal year ended March 31, 2005. The improvement compared to the previous year is mainly due
to an increase in relatively higher-margin value-added services and systems integration.
Net income for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2007 was ¥5.4 billion, an improvement from net
income of ¥4.8 billion for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2006 and ¥2.9 billion for the year ended
March 31, 2005. The improvement in net income is mainly due to an increase in operating income and
a release of valuation allowance against deferred income tax assets related to tax operating loss
carryforwards and others.
We have generated cash in the last three fiscal years from sales of equity. On December 2,
2005, we listed on the Mothers market of the Tokyo Stock Exchange (TSE). In connection with the
listing, we issued 12,500 new shares of common stock for an amount of ¥6.0 billion. As we conducted
a 1 to 5 stock split on
41
October 11, 2005, the total number of our issued shares of common stock
increased to 204,300. On December 14, 2006, we moved to the First Section of the TSE for our
listing in Japan, without the issuance of new shares.
In order to provide our customers with total network solutions, we provide our services
directly or by working together with the subsidiaries and affiliates of IIJ Group. We refer to our
subsidiaries and certain affiliates as our group companies, and we have invested heavily in and
exercise significant influence over these companies. For the fiscal year ended March 31, 2007, we
consolidated the results of operations of five subsidiaries included among our group companies
IIJ Technology Inc. (IIJ-Tech), IIJ Financial Systems Inc., Net Care, Inc. (Net Care), Net Chart Japan Inc. (NCJ) and IIJ America Inc.
(IIJ-A). We account for our investments in the affiliated companies by the equity method.
On October 1, 2005, IIJ Media Communications Inc. (IIJ-MC), our former consolidated
subsidiary, was merged into us after a portion of IIJ-MCs business was transferred to IIJ-Tech,
our consolidated subsidiary. Asia Internet Holding Co., Ltd. (AIH), our former equity method
investee, became our wholly owned consolidated subsidiary, and was merged into us on October 1,
2005. In each of the mergers, we were the surviving company.
On February 1, 2006, we established a joint venture company, Internet Revolution Inc.
(i-revo), with Konami Corporation, with the purpose of operating comprehensive portal sites. We
invested ¥750 million and hold 30.0% of the company. i-revo is an equity method investee.
On August 10, 2006, we invested ¥110 million and established a new consolidated subsidiary,
NCJ. NCJ is fully owned by the Company. NCJ commenced its business operations after it succeeded
to the business operations of Net Chart Japan Corporation on October 1, 2006 for ¥75 million. NCJ
provides network construction that is mainly related to Local Area Networks.
On March 30, 2007, we purchased additional shares of IIJ-Tech from its minority shareholders
for ¥2.7 billion in cash, in order to acquire additional interest in IIJ-Tech.
For a discussion of factors affecting our future financial results, see Item. 5.D. Trend
Information.
42
Results of Operations
As an aid to understanding our operating results, the following tables show items from our
statement of income for the periods indicated in millions of yen amounts (or thousands of U.S.
dollars) and as a percentage of total revenues.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal year ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
(millions of yen except for percentage data) |
|
|
(thousands |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
of U.S. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
dollars) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
REVENUES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Connectivity and value-added services: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dedicated access |
|
¥ |
11,373 |
|
|
|
27.3 |
% |
|
¥ |
10,625 |
|
|
|
21.3 |
% |
|
¥ |
10,792 |
|
|
|
18.9 |
% |
|
$ |
91,797 |
|
Dial-up access |
|
|
2,937 |
|
|
|
7.0 |
|
|
|
2,674 |
|
|
|
5.4 |
|
|
|
2,416 |
|
|
|
4.2 |
|
|
|
20,554 |
|
Value-added services |
|
|
5,005 |
|
|
|
12.0 |
|
|
|
6,250 |
|
|
|
12.5 |
|
|
|
7,416 |
|
|
|
13.0 |
|
|
|
63,079 |
|
Other |
|
|
3,169 |
|
|
|
7.6 |
|
|
|
3,674 |
|
|
|
7.4 |
|
|
|
3,729 |
|
|
|
6.6 |
|
|
|
31,725 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
22,484 |
|
|
|
53.9 |
|
|
|
23,223 |
|
|
|
46.6 |
|
|
|
24,353 |
|
|
|
42.7 |
|
|
|
207,155 |
|
Systems integration |
|
|
15,854 |
|
|
|
38.0 |
|
|
|
23,505 |
|
|
|
47.2 |
|
|
|
30,527 |
|
|
|
53.5 |
|
|
|
259,672 |
|
Equipment sales |
|
|
3,365 |
|
|
|
8.1 |
|
|
|
3,085 |
|
|
|
6.2 |
|
|
|
2,175 |
|
|
|
3.8 |
|
|
|
18,496 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
|
41,703 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
49,813 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
57,055 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
485,323 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
COST AND EXPENSES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of connectivity and value-added
services: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Backbone cost |
|
|
3,551 |
|
|
|
8.5 |
|
|
|
3,516 |
|
|
|
7.0 |
|
|
|
3,516 |
|
|
|
6.2 |
|
|
|
29,908 |
|
Local access line cost |
|
|
4,040 |
|
|
|
9.7 |
|
|
|
4,558 |
|
|
|
9.2 |
|
|
|
4,616 |
|
|
|
8.1 |
|
|
|
39,269 |
|
Other connectivity cost |
|
|
1,361 |
|
|
|
3.3 |
|
|
|
815 |
|
|
|
1.6 |
|
|
|
331 |
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
2,813 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
2,938 |
|
|
|
7.0 |
|
|
|
2,721 |
|
|
|
5.5 |
|
|
|
2,639 |
|
|
|
4.6 |
|
|
|
22.450 |
|
Other |
|
|
7,594 |
|
|
|
18.2 |
|
|
|
8,468 |
|
|
|
17.0 |
|
|
|
9,443 |
|
|
|
16.5 |
|
|
|
80,325 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cost of connectivity and
value-added services |
|
|
19,484 |
|
|
|
46.7 |
|
|
|
20,078 |
|
|
|
40.3 |
|
|
|
20,545 |
|
|
|
36.0 |
|
|
|
174,765 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of systems integration: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of equipment sales related to
systems integration |
|
|
1,759 |
|
|
|
4.2 |
|
|
|
3,591 |
|
|
|
7.2 |
|
|
|
4,206 |
|
|
|
7.3 |
|
|
|
35,774 |
|
Other |
|
|
10,441 |
|
|
|
25.0 |
|
|
|
14,529 |
|
|
|
29.2 |
|
|
|
19,323 |
|
|
|
33.9 |
|
|
|
164,371 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cost of systems integration |
|
|
12,200 |
|
|
|
29.2 |
|
|
|
18,120 |
|
|
|
36.4 |
|
|
|
23,529 |
|
|
|
41.2 |
|
|
|
200,145 |
|
Cost of equipment sales |
|
|
3,111 |
|
|
|
7.5 |
|
|
|
2,818 |
|
|
|
5.7 |
|
|
|
1,894 |
|
|
|
3.4 |
|
|
|
16,104 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cost |
|
|
34,795 |
|
|
|
83.4 |
|
|
|
41,016 |
|
|
|
82.4 |
|
|
|
45,968 |
|
|
|
80.6 |
|
|
|
391,014 |
|
Sales and marketing |
|
|
2,795 |
|
|
|
6.7 |
|
|
|
3,080 |
|
|
|
6.2 |
|
|
|
3,439 |
|
|
|
6.0 |
|
|
|
29,251 |
|
General and administrative |
|
|
2,666 |
|
|
|
6.4 |
|
|
|
3,147 |
|
|
|
6.3 |
|
|
|
3,971 |
|
|
|
7.0 |
|
|
|
33,776 |
|
Research and development |
|
|
199 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
159 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
177 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
1,508 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cost and expenses |
|
|
40,455 |
|
|
|
97.0 |
|
|
|
47,402 |
|
|
|
95.2 |
|
|
|
53,555 |
|
|
|
93.9 |
|
|
|
455,549 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OPERATING INCOME |
|
|
1,248 |
|
|
|
3.0 |
|
|
|
2,411 |
|
|
|
4.8 |
|
|
|
3,500 |
|
|
|
6.1 |
|
|
|
29,774 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OTHER INCOME (EXPENSES): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income |
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
196 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
(686 |
) |
|
|
(1.6 |
) |
|
|
(437 |
) |
|
|
(0.9 |
) |
|
|
(397 |
) |
|
|
(0.7 |
) |
|
|
(3,381 |
) |
Foreign exchange gains (losses) |
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
(0.0 |
) |
|
|
(3 |
) |
Net gain on other investments |
|
|
2,439 |
|
|
|
5.9 |
|
|
|
3,198 |
|
|
|
6.5 |
|
|
|
1,867 |
|
|
|
3.3 |
|
|
|
15,877 |
|
Other net |
|
|
128 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
191 |
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
56 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
482 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income net |
|
|
1,900 |
|
|
|
4.6 |
|
|
|
2,968 |
|
|
|
6.0 |
|
|
|
1,549 |
|
|
|
2.7 |
|
|
|
13,171 |
|
INCOME FROM OPERATIONS BEFORE INCOME TAX
EXPENSE (BENEFIT), MINORITY INTERESTS AND
EQUITY IN NET LOSS OF EQUITY METHOD
INVESTEES |
|
¥ |
3,148 |
|
|
|
7.6 |
% |
|
¥ |
5,379 |
|
|
|
10.8 |
% |
|
¥ |
5,049 |
|
|
|
8.8 |
% |
|
$ |
42,945 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INCOME TAX EXPENSE (BENEFIT) |
|
¥ |
100 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
% |
|
¥ |
257 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
% |
|
¥ |
(804 |
) |
|
|
(1.4 |
)% |
|
$ |
(6,839 |
) |
MINORITY INTERESTS IN EARNINGS OF
SUBSIDIARIES |
|
|
(109 |
) |
|
|
(0.3 |
) |
|
|
(354 |
) |
|
|
(0.7 |
) |
|
|
(233 |
) |
|
|
(0.4 |
) |
|
|
(1,979 |
) |
EQUITY IN NET LOSS OF EQUITY METHOD
INVESTEES |
|
|
(33 |
) |
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
(14 |
) |
|
|
(0.0 |
) |
|
|
(210 |
) |
|
|
(0.3 |
) |
|
|
(1,788 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal year ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
(millions of yen except for percentage data) |
|
|
(thousands |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
of U.S. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
dollars) |
|
|
NET INCOME |
|
¥ |
2,906 |
|
|
|
7.0 |
% |
|
¥ |
4,754 |
|
|
|
9.6 |
% |
|
¥ |
5,410 |
|
|
|
9.5 |
% |
|
$ |
46,017 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended March 31, 2007 Compared to the Year Ended March 31, 2006
Total revenues
Our total revenues increased 14.5% to ¥57.1 billion for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2007
from ¥49.8 billion for the previous fiscal year. These increases were primarily due to an increase
in value-added services and systems integration revenues.
Connectivity and value-added services revenues. Revenues from connectivity services and
value-added services, which comprise our dedicated access, dial-up access, value-added services and
other services, increased 4.9% to ¥24.4 billion for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2007 from ¥23.2
billion for the previous fiscal year.
|
|
|
Dedicated access. Revenues from dedicated access services increased 1.6% to ¥10.8
billion for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2007 from ¥10.6 billion for the previous
fiscal year. The increase was mainly due to an increase in revenues from broadband
services along with the expansion of broadband utilization in the corporate internal
network and an increase in revenues from IP Services, the services mainly used for
corporate headquarters and data centers, along with customers shift to higher speeds. |
|
|
|
|
Dial-up access. Revenues from dial-up access services decreased 9.6% to ¥2.4
billion for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2007 from ¥2.7 billion for the previous
fiscal year. This decrease was primarily the result of declining revenues from
services for individuals such as IIJ4U Service, as well as the discontinuance of
services of certain large customers to which we provided our services as OEM. |
|
|
|
|
Value-added services. Our value-added services revenues increased 18.7% to ¥7.4
billion for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2007 from ¥6.2 billion for the previous
fiscal year. This increase was mainly due to a steady increase in revenues from
solutions such as data center services, security and e-mail related outsourcing
services and network related solutions such as SEIL and SEIL Management Framework,
along with projects to connect customers multiple operational sites. The steady
increase is affected by an increase in demand for outsourcing services by corporate
customers. |
|
|
|
|
Other. Other revenues, which included rental fees for network equipment, customer
support service, and sale of Wide-area Ethernet services, amounted to ¥3.7 billion for
the fiscal year ended March 31, 2007, a 1.5% increase from the previous fiscal year. |
Systems integration revenues. Our revenues from systems integration, which include equipment
sales related to systems integration, increased 29.9% to ¥30.5 billion for the fiscal year ended
March 31, 2007 from ¥23.5 billion for the previous fiscal year. The increase was mainly due to a
significant increase in one-time revenues from the design and construction of large-scale network
systems for corporate customers and a continuous increase in recurring revenues from the operation
and maintenance of the systems.
44
Equipment sales. Our equipment sales decreased 29.5% to ¥2.2 billion for the fiscal year ended
March 31, 2007 from ¥3.1 billion for the previous fiscal year.
Total cost of revenues
Total cost of revenues increased 12.1% to ¥46.0 billion for the fiscal year ended March 31,
2007 from ¥41.0 billion for the previous fiscal year. The increase was mainly because cost of
systems integration revenues increased corresponding with the significant increase in systems
integration revenues, while the cost of connectivity and value-added services revenues slightly
increased compared to the previous fiscal year.
Cost of connectivity and value-added services revenues. Cost of connectivity and value-added
services revenues increased 2.3% to ¥20.5 billion for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2007 from
¥20.1 billion for the previous fiscal year. The gross margin ratio in connectivity and value-added
services revenues, which is the ratio of (1) the amount obtained by subtracting cost of
connectivity and value-added services revenues from connectivity and value-added services revenues
to (2) connectivity and value-added services revenues, increased 15.6% from the fiscal year ended
March 31, 2007 from 13.5% for the previous fiscal year. This increase is mainly a result of an
increase in revenues from relatively higher-margin value-added services. Backbone costs for the
fiscal year ended March 31, 2007 were ¥3.5 billion, almost the same as the previous fiscal year.
Local access line costs for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2007 were ¥4.6 billion, almost the same
as the previous fiscal year.
Cost of systems integration revenues. Our cost of systems integration revenues increased 29.8%
to ¥23.5 billion for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2007 from ¥18.1 billion for the previous
fiscal year. The increase is mainly due to the increase in systems integration revenues. The gross
margin ratio in systems integration revenues, which is the ratio of (1) the amount obtained by
subtracting cost of systems integration revenues from systems integration revenues to (2) systems
integration revenues, for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2007 was 22.9%, almost the same as
compared to the previous fiscal year.
Cost of equipment sales. Our cost of equipment sales decreased 32.8% to ¥1.9 billion for the
fiscal year ended March 31, 2007 from ¥2.8 billion for the previous fiscal year. The decrease is
mainly due to the decrease in equipment sales revenues. The gross margin ratio, as the figure
subtracting cost of equipment sales from equipment sales revenues to equipment sales revenues, in
equipment sales increased to 12.9% for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2007 from 8.7% for the
previous fiscal year.
Total costs and expenses
Total costs and expenses, which include total cost of revenues, sales and marketing expenses,
general and administrative expenses and research and development expenses, increased 13.0% to ¥53.6
billion for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2007 from ¥47.4 billion for the previous fiscal year.
The increase in total costs and expenses was primarily a result of an increase in the cost of
systems integration, sales and marketing expenses and general and administrative expenses.
Sales and marketing. Sales and marketing expenses increased 11.7% to ¥3.4 billion for the
fiscal year ended March 31, 2007 from ¥3.1 billion for the previous fiscal year. The increase was
mainly due to an increase in personnel expenses of ¥0.2 billion and advertising expenses of ¥0.1
billion that increased along with the business expansion.
General and administrative. General and administrative expenses increased 26.2% to ¥4.0
billion for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2007 from ¥3.1 billion for the previous fiscal year.
The increase was mainly due to an increase in personnel expenses of ¥0.5 billion including a
provision for retirement benefits for
45
directors of ¥0.2 billion related to an introduction of
retirement benefits rules, and an increase in outsourcing expenses of ¥97 million resulting from
business expansion.
Research and development. Research and development expenses increased 12.1% to ¥177 million
for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2007 from ¥158 million for the previous fiscal year.
Operating income
As a result of the foregoing factors, operating income increased 45.2% to ¥3.5 billion for the
fiscal year ended March 31, 2007 from ¥2.4 billion for the previous fiscal year.
Other income-net
Other income-net of ¥1.5 billion was recorded for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2007,
compared to ¥3.0 billion for the previous fiscal year.
Interest income. Interest income was ¥23 million for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2007,
compared to ¥13 million for the previous fiscal year.
Interest expense. Interest expense, comprised of interest expense in respect of bank
borrowings and capital lease obligations, amounted to ¥397 million for the fiscal year ended March
31, 2007 compared to ¥437 million for the previous fiscal year. The decrease is mainly due to a
decrease in borrowings.
Foreign exchange gains (losses). Foreign exchange loss amounted to ¥0.3 million for the fiscal
year ended March 31, 2007 compared to gain of ¥3 million for the previous year.
Net gain on other investments. For the fiscal year ended March 31, 2007, we recorded gain on
other investments of ¥1.9 billion, which included gains of ¥3.2 billion from the sale of certain
available-for-sale securities, compared to gains of ¥3.2 billion for the previous year, offset by
an impairment loss of ¥1.4 billion on unlisted securities, including an impairment loss of ¥1.0
billion on the securities of IPMobile Incorporated.
Other-net. For the fiscal year ended March 31, 2007, we recorded other income of ¥57 million,
most of which is dividend income of ¥102 million for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2007, compared
to income of ¥191 million for the previous year.
Income from operations before income tax expense (benefit), minority interests and equity in net
loss of equity method investees
We recorded income from operations before income tax benefit, minority interests and equity in
net loss of equity method investees of ¥5.0 billion for the
fiscal year ended March 31, 2007 compared to
income from operations before income tax expense, minority interests and equity in net loss of
equity method investees of ¥5.4 billion for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2006. The decrease
primarily reflects the decrease in other income-net mainly due to the impairment loss on unlisted
securities above.
Income tax expense (benefit)
For the fiscal year ended March 31, 2007, we recorded an income tax benefit of ¥804 million
compared to an income tax expense of ¥257 million for the previous fiscal year. The income tax
benefit for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2007 was mainly due to deferred tax benefits of ¥1.5
billion resulting from a release of valuation allowance against deferred income tax assets related
to tax operating loss carryforwards and others.
46
Minority interests in earnings of subsidiaries
Minority interests in earnings of subsidiaries decreased by ¥121 million to ¥233 million for
the fiscal year ended March 31, 2007. The decrease was mainly due to a decrease in net income of
IIJ-Tech, which was mainly affected by the absence of the income tax benefit for IIJ-Tech that was
recorded in the previous fiscal year.
Equity in net loss of equity method investees
Equity in net loss of equity method investees increased to ¥210 million for the fiscal year
ended March 31, 2007 from ¥14 million for the previous fiscal year. Although equity in net income
of equity method investees was recorded in Internet Multifeed Co., equity in net loss of equity
method investees was recorded in i-revo.
Net income
Net income for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2007 was ¥5.4 billion compared with ¥4.8
billion for the previous fiscal year. The improvement primarily reflects the increase in operating
income and a release of valuation allowance against deferred income tax assets related to tax operating loss
carryforwards and others.
Year Ended March 31, 2006 Compared to the Year Ended March 31, 2005
Total revenues
Our total revenues increased 19.4% to ¥49.8 billion for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2006
from ¥41.7 billion for the previous fiscal year. These increases were primarily due to an increase
in value-added services and systems integration revenues.
Connectivity and value-added services revenues. Revenues from connectivity services and
value-added services, which comprise our dedicated access, dial-up access, value-added services and
other services, increased 3.3% to ¥23.2 billion for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2006 from ¥22.5
billion for the previous fiscal year.
|
|
|
Dedicated access. Revenues from dedicated access services decreased 6.6% to ¥10.6
billion for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2006 from ¥11.4 billion for the previous
fiscal year. This decrease reflected a decrease of revenues of ¥468 million from the
interconnection of the Companys network with AIH, our former equity method investee,
which resulted from the consolidation of AIHs revenues following the merger of AIH
into the Company. The decrease is also due to the decline in unit price per bandwidth. |
|
|
|
|
Dial-up access. Revenues from dial-up access services decreased 9.0% to ¥2.7
billion for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2006 from ¥2.9 billion for the previous
fiscal year. This decrease was primarily the result of declining revenues from
services for individuals such as IIJ4U Service. The revenues from IIJ4U decreased by
¥0.1 billion from the previous fiscal year. |
|
|
|
|
Value-added services. Our value-added services revenues increased 24.9% to ¥6.2
billion for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2006 from ¥5.0 billion for the previous
fiscal year. This increase was mainly due to a steady increase in revenues from
solutions such as data center services, security and e-mail related outsourcing
services and network related solutions such as SEIL and SEIL Management Framework,
along with projects to connect customers multiple operational sites. The steady
increase is affected by an increase in demand for outsourcing services by corporate
customers.
|
47
|
|
|
Other. Other revenues, which included rental fees for network equipment, customer
support service, and sale of Wide-area Ethernet services, amounted to ¥3.7 billion for
the fiscal year ended March 31, 2006, a 15.9% increase from the previous fiscal year.
The increase was mainly due to a continuous increase in sales of Wide-area Ethernet
services which increased by 43.8% compared to the previous fiscal year. |
Systems integration revenues. Our revenues from systems integration, which include equipment
sales related to systems integration, increased 48.3% to ¥23.5 billion for the fiscal year ended
March 31, 2006 from ¥15.9 billion for the previous fiscal year. The increase was mainly due to a
significant increase in one-time revenues from the design and construction of large-scale network
systems for corporate customers and a continuous increase in recurring revenues from the operation
and maintenance of the systems.
Equipment sales. Our equipment sales decreased 8.3% to ¥3.1 billion for the fiscal year ended
March 31, 2006 from ¥3.4 billion for the previous fiscal year.
Total cost of revenues
Total cost of revenues increased 17.9% to ¥41.0 billion for the fiscal year ended March 31,
2006 from ¥34.8 billion for the previous fiscal year. The increase was mainly because cost of
systems integration revenues increased corresponding with the significant increase in systems integration
revenues, while the cost of connectivity and value-added services revenues slightly increased
compared to the previous fiscal year.
Cost of connectivity and value-added services revenues. Cost of connectivity and value-added
services revenues increased 3.0% to ¥20.1 billion for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2006 from
¥19.5 billion for the previous fiscal year. The gross margin ratio in connectivity and value-added
services revenues increased to 13.5% for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2006 from 13.3% for the
previous fiscal year. This increase is mainly a result of an increase in revenues from relatively
higher-margin value-added services and a decrease in backbone costs. Local access line costs
increased due to steady revenue growth in Wide-area Ethernet services. Backbone costs decreased
1.0% to ¥3.5 billion for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2006 from ¥3.6 billion for the previous
fiscal year. Local access line costs increased 12.8% to ¥4.6 billion from ¥4.0 billion for the
previous fiscal year.
Cost of systems integration revenues. Our cost of systems integration revenues increased 48.5%
to ¥18.1 billion for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2006 from ¥12.2 billion for the previous
fiscal year. The increase is mainly due to the increase in systems integration revenues. The gross
margin ratio in systems integration revenues was 22.9% for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2006,
compared to 23.0% for the previous fiscal year. Revenues from the construction of large-scale
network systems, which has a lower-margin compared to systems operation and maintenance, increased.
Cost of equipment sales. Our cost of equipment sales decreased 9.4% to ¥2.8 billion for the
fiscal year ended March 31, 2006 from ¥3.1 billion for the previous fiscal year. The decrease is
mainly due to the decrease in equipment sales revenues. The gross margin ratio in equipment sales
increased to 8.7% for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2006 from 7.5% for the previous fiscal year.
Total costs and expenses
Total costs and expenses, which include total cost of revenues, sales and marketing expenses,
general and administrative expenses and research and development expenses, increased 17.2% to ¥47.4
billion for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2006 from ¥40.5 billion for the previous fiscal year.
The increase in total costs and expenses was primarily a result of an increase in the cost of
systems integration, sales and marketing expenses and general and administrative expenses.
48
Sales and marketing. Sales and marketing expenses increased 10.2% to ¥3.1 billion for the
fiscal year ended March 31, 2006 from ¥2.8 billion for the previous fiscal year. The increase was
mainly due to an increase in advertising expenses, personnel expenses and outsourcing expenses that
increased along with the business expansion.
General and administrative. General and administrative expenses increased 18.1% to ¥3.1
billion for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2006 from ¥2.7 billion for the previous fiscal year.
The increase was mainly due to increases in personnel expenses and rent expenses. The increase in
rent expenses is mainly due to an expansion of the office for the administrative section,
necessitated by an enhancement of administrative functions.
Research
and development. Research and development expenses decreased 20.5% to ¥158 million
for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2006 from ¥199 million for the previous fiscal year. The
decrease is primarily due to reduced development expenses relating to the SEIL Series.
Operating income
As a result of the foregoing factors, operating income increased 93.3% to ¥2.4 billion for the
fiscal year ended March 31, 2006 from ¥1.2 billion for the previous fiscal year.
Other income (expenses)-net
Net other income of ¥3.0 billion was recorded for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2006
compared to ¥1.9 billion for the previous fiscal year.
Interest income. Interest income was ¥13 million for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2006,
almost the same as ¥13 million for the previous fiscal year.
Interest expense. Interest expense, comprised of interest expense in respect of bank
borrowings, convertible notes and capital lease obligations, amounted to ¥437 million for the
fiscal year ended March 31, 2006 compared to ¥686 million for the previous fiscal year. Interest
expense decreased due to an absence of interest payments related to the convertible notes that we
redeemed in March 2005.
Foreign exchange gains. Foreign exchange gains amounted to ¥3 million for the fiscal year
ended March 31, 2006 compared to gains of ¥6 million for the previous year.
Net gain on other investments. For the fiscal year ended March 31, 2006, we recorded net gain
on other investments of ¥3.2 billion, which included gains of ¥3.2 billion generated by the sale of
certain available-for-sale securities, compared to gains of ¥2.4 billion for the previous year.
Other-net. For the fiscal year ended March 31, 2006, we recorded other income of ¥191 million,
most of which was dividend income of ¥120 million for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2006,
compared to income of ¥128 million for the previous year.
Income from operations before income tax expense, minority interests and equity in net loss of
equity method investees
We recorded income from operations before income tax expense, minority interests and equity in
net loss of equity method investees of ¥5.4 billion for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2006
compared to income from operations before income tax expense, minority interests and equity in net
loss of equity method investees of ¥3.1 billion for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2005. The
improvement primarily reflects the increase in operating income and the increase of gains from the
sale of available-for-sale securities.
49
Income tax expense
For the fiscal year ended March 31, 2006, we recorded an income tax expense of ¥257 million
compared to an income tax expense of ¥100 million for the previous fiscal year. The income tax
expense for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2006 increased mainly due to the reserve for tax
contingencies related to the use of tax operating loss carryforwards by IIJ-A and income taxes
payable related to taxable income of our consolidated subsidiaries.
Minority interests in earnings of subsidiaries
Minority interests in earnings of subsidiaries increased by ¥245 million to ¥354 million for
the fiscal year ended March 31, 2006. Earnings of subsidiaries increased mainly due to improved
performance of IIJ-Tech and Net Care.
Equity in net loss of equity method investees
Equity in net loss of equity method investees decreased to ¥14 million for the fiscal year
ended March 31, 2006 from ¥33 million for the previous fiscal year. Although equity in net income
of equity method investees was recorded in Internet Multifeed Co., equity in net loss of equity
method investees was recorded in our new equity method investee, i-revo.
Net income
Net income for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2006 was ¥4.8 billion compared with ¥2.9
billion for the previous fiscal year. The improvement primarily reflects the increase in operating
income and the increase of gains from the sale of available-for-sale securities.
Application of Critical Accounting Policies
In reviewing our financial statements, you should consider the sensitivity of our reported
financial condition and results of operations to changes in the conditions and assumptions
underlying the estimates and judgments made by our management in applying critical accounting
policies.
The preparation of financial statements requires the use of estimates, judgments and
assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial
statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses for the periods presented. Actual
results may differ from these estimates, judgments and assumptions. Note 1 to our consolidated
financial statements includes a summary of the significant accounting policies used in the
preparation of our financial statements. Certain accounting policies are particularly critical
because of their significance to our reported results and because of the possibility that future
events may differ significantly from the conditions and assumptions underlying the estimates used
and judgments made by our management in preparing our financial statements.
We have discussed the development and selection of critical accounting policies and estimates
with our Board of Directors, and the Board of Directors has reviewed the disclosure relating to
these, which are included in this Operating and Financial Review and Prospects. For all of these
policies, we caution that future events rarely develop exactly as forecast, and even the best
estimates may require adjustment.
Revenue recognition
Revenues from connectivity services consist principally of dedicated access and dial-up
access. The term of these contracts is one year for dedicated access and generally one month for
dial up access. All these services are billed and recognized monthly on a straight line basis.
50
Value-added
service revenues consist principally of sales of various Internet access-related
services. Value-added services also include monthly fees from data center services. Other revenues
under connectivity and value-added services consist principally of Wide-area Ethernet services and
call-center customer support. The terms of these services are generally for one year and revenues
are recognized on a straight-line basis during the service period.
Initial set up fees received in connection with connectivity services and value-added services
are deferred and recognized over the contract period.
Systems integration revenues consist principally of the development of Internet network
systems and related maintenance, monitoring and other operating services. Systems integration
service is subject to the Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) Issue No. 00-21, Revenue
Arrangements with Multiple Deliverables. For deliverables in multiple-element arrangements, the
guidance below is applied for separability and allocation. A multiple-element arrangement is
separated into more than one unit of accounting if all of the following criteria are met:
|
|
|
The delivered item(s) has value to the client on a stand-alone basis, |
|
|
|
There is objective and reliable evidence of the fair value of the undelivered item(s), and |
|
|
|
|
If the arrangement includes a general right of return relative to the
delivered item(s), delivery or performance of the undelivered item(s) is considered
probable and substantially in the control of the company. |
If these criteria are not met, the arrangement is accounted for as one unit of accounting
which would result in revenue being recognized on a straight-line basis or being deferred until the
earlier of when such criteria are met or when the last undelivered element is delivered. If these
criteria are met for each element and there is objective and reliable evidence of fair value for
all units of accounting in an arrangement, the arrangement consideration is allocated to the
separate units of accounting based on each units relative fair value.
The period for the development of the systems is less than one year and revenues are
recognized when network systems and equipment are delivered and accepted by the customer. When the
equipment or system is delivered prior to other elements of the arrangement, revenue is deferred
until other service elements are completed and accepted by the customer because the customer may
return all of the equipment or system in the event that the Company does not complete other service
elements. Maintenance, monitoring and operating service revenues are recognized ratably over the
separate contract period, which is generally for one year.
Equipment
sales are reported on a gross or net basis in accordance with EITF Issue No. 99-19
Reporting Revenue Gross as a Principal versus Net as an Agent. Revenues are recognized when
equipment is delivered and accepted by the customer. Title to equipment passes when equipment is
accepted by the customer.
Useful lives of property and equipment
Property and equipment, net recorded on our balance sheet was ¥9,832 million at March 31,
2007, representing 20.6% of our total assets. The values of our property and equipment, including
purchased software and property and equipment under capital leases, are recorded in our financial
statements at acquisition cost, and are principally depreciated or amortized on a straight-line
basis over the shorter of the lease term or estimated useful life of the asset. Our depreciation
and amortization expenses for property and
51
equipment for the fiscal years ended March 31, 2005,
2006 and 2007 were ¥4,109 million, ¥4,207 million and ¥4,228 million, respectively.
We estimate the useful lives of property and equipment in order to determine the amount of
depreciation and amortization expense to be recorded in each fiscal year. We determine the useful
lives of our assets at the time the assets are acquired and base our determinations on expected
use, experience with similar assets, established laws and regulations as well as taking into
account anticipated technological or other changes. Estimated useful lives at March 31, 2007, were
as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Item |
|
Useful Lives |
Data communications, office and other equipment |
|
|
2 to 15 years |
|
Leasehold improvements |
|
|
3 to 15 years |
|
Purchased software |
|
|
5 years |
|
Capitalized leases |
|
|
4 to 7 years |
|
If technological or other changes were to occur more rapidly or in a different form than
anticipated or new laws or regulations are enacted or the intended use changes, the useful lives
assigned to these assets may need to be shortened, or we may need to sell or write off the assets,
resulting in recognition of increased depreciation and amortization or losses in future periods.
Our losses on disposal of property and equipment for the fiscal years ended March 31, 2005, 2006
and 2007 were ¥144 million, ¥119 million and ¥151 million, respectively. The loss on disposal of
property and equipment for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2005 was mainly related to the
relocation of branch offices and disposal of telephone rights as a result of a decrease in revenues
from dial-up access services. The loss on disposal of property and equipment for the fiscal year
ended March 31, 2006 was mainly related to disposal of software, such as back-office systems. The loss on disposal of property and equipment for the fiscal year ended March 31,
2007 was mainly related to disposal of software, such as back-office systems and network equipment
related to the closing of a network operation center.
A one-year change in the useful life of these assets would have increased or decreased
depreciation expense by approximately ¥1.3 billion and ¥0.8 billion, respectively.
Ordinary maintenance and repairs are charged to income as incurred. Major replacements and
improvements are capitalized. When properties are retired or otherwise disposed of, the property
and related accumulated depreciation accounts are relieved of the applicable amounts and any
differences are included in operating cost and expenses.
We determined the useful lives of customer relationship intangible assets recognized during
the fiscal year ended March 31, 2007 as indefinite, as we
believe that it is not rational for us to
set useful lives to customer relationship intangible assets since the contract renewal rate for
services are very high.
Impairment of long-lived assets
Long-lived assets consist primarily of property and equipment, including capitalized leases,
and goodwill and intangible assets. We perform an impairment review for our long-lived assets,
whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the assets may not
be recoverable. This analysis is separate from our analysis of the useful lives of our assets, but
it is affected by some similar factors. Factors that we consider important which could trigger an
impairment review include, but are not limited to, the impact of the following trends or
conditions:
|
|
|
significant decline in the market value of an asset, |
|
|
|
|
current period operating cash flow loss,
|
52
|
|
|
introduction of competing technologies or services, |
|
|
|
|
significant underperformance of expected or historical cash flows, |
|
|
|
|
significant or continuing decline in subscribers, |
|
|
|
|
changes in the manner or use of an asset, |
|
|
|
|
disruptions in the use of network equipment under capital lease arrangements, and |
|
|
|
|
other negative industry or economic trends. |
When we determine that the carrying amount of specific assets may not be recoverable based on
the existence or occurrence of one or more of the above or other factors, we estimate the future
cash inflows and outflows expected to be generated by the assets over their expected useful lives.
We estimate the sum of expected undiscounted future cash flows based upon historical trends
adjusted to reflect our best estimate of future market and operating conditions. If the sum of the
expected undiscounted future net cash flows is less than the carrying value of the assets, we
record an impairment loss based on the fair values of the assets. Such fair values may be based on
established markets, independent appraisals and valuations or discounted cash flows. If actual
market and operating conditions under which assets are used are less favorable or shorter than
those projected by management, resulting in reduced cash flows, additional impairment charges for
assets not previously written-off may be required. An impairment loss of ¥26 million on telephone
rights was recorded for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2005 because NTT reduced the price of
telephone rights by 50 percent after March 31, 2005. There was no impairment loss for long-lived
assets for the fiscal years ended March 31, 2006 and 2007. There was no impairment loss for long-lived assets, including goodwill and intangible assets other than the telephone rights above,
for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2005.
Allowance for doubtful accounts and uncollectible contractual prepayments
We maintain allowances for doubtful accounts for estimated losses resulting from the inability
of our customers to make required payments. At March 31, 2006 and 2007, we maintained allowances
for doubtful accounts of ¥114 million and ¥123 million, respectively. Management specifically
analyzes accounts and loans receivable including historical bad debts, customer concentrations,
customer credit-worthiness and current economic trends when evaluating the adequacy of the
allowances for doubtful accounts. If the financial condition of our customers or debtors were to
deteriorate, resulting in an impairment of their ability to make payments, additional allowances
may be required.
Deferred tax assets
To date, our deferred tax assets have been offset by a valuation allowance. We record a valuation
allowance to reduce our deferred tax assets to the amount that is more likely than not to be
realized. As of March 31, 2007, the Company had tax operating loss carryforwards of ¥17.1 billion.
The loss carryforwards are available to offset future taxable income and will expire as shown in
Note 9 to our consolidated financial statements. The deferred tax benefit resulting from a release
of valuation allowance against deferred income tax assets related to tax operating loss
carryforwards for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2007 was ¥1.5 billion for the fiscal year ended
March 31, 2007. While we have considered future taxable income and ongoing prudent and feasible tax
planning strategies in assessing the need for the valuation allowance, in the event we were to
determine that we would be able to realize the deferred tax assets in the future in excess of the
net recorded amount, an adjustment to the valuation allowance and deferred tax benefit would
increase income in the period such determination was made.
53
Valuation of investments
Our investment in securities is significant, and the valuation of such investments, requires
us to make judgments using information that is generally uncertain at the time, such as assumptions
regarding future financial conditions and cash flows. As at March 31, 2007, we had investments in
securities classified as other investments in the amount of ¥2,842 million. We routinely assess the
impairment of our investments by considering whether any decline in value is other-than-temporary.
The factors we consider are:
|
|
|
the length of time and the extent to which the market value has been less than
cost, |
|
|
|
|
the financial condition and near-term prospects of the issuer, including any
specific events which may influence the operations of the issuer such as changes in
technology that may impair the earnings potential of the investment, and |
|
|
|
|
our intent and ability to retain the investment in the issuer for a period of time
sufficient to allow for any anticipated recovery in market value. If a decline in
value occurs and is deemed to be other-than-temporary, an impairment loss will be
recorded to write-down the carrying value of the investment to fair value. If, after
taking into account these considerations, the decline is judged to be other than
temporary, the cost basis of the individual security is written down to a new cost
basis and the amount of the write-down is accounted for as a realized loss. |
Our unrealized loss on investments in marketable equity security relates to a management
company which owns and operates golf courses and a Japanese commercial bank. The fair value of each
investment is 26% and 25% less than its cost, respectively. The duration of the unrealized loss
position was less than 6 months. Based on our ability and intent to hold the investment for a
reasonable period of time sufficient for a recovery of fair value, we do not consider the
investment to be other-than-temporary impaired at March 31, 2007.
Losses on write-down of investments in certain marketable and nonmarketable equity
securities, included in other income (expenses), were recognized to reflect the decline in value
considered to be other than temporary, which were ¥34 million and ¥118 million, respectively, for
the year ended March 31, 2005. Such losses in certain nonmarketable equity securities, included in other
income (expenses), were ¥30 million and ¥1,363 million for the years ended March 31, 2006 and 2007,
respectively.
In addition to investments in securities, we also have investments in equities and loans for
which we have significant influence over the investees operations and financial policies and are
accounted for by the equity method. For other than temporary declines in the value of such
investments below the carrying amount, the investment is reduced to fair value and an impairment
loss is recognized.
Pension benefits costs
Employee pension benefit costs and obligations are dependent on certain assumptions including
discount rate, retirement rate and rate of increase in compensation levels, which are based upon
current statistical data, as well as expected long-term rate of return on plan assets and other
factors. Specifically, the discount rate and expected long-term rate of return on assets are two
critical assumptions in the determination of periodic pension cost and pension liabilities.
Assumptions are evaluated at least annually and when events occur or circumstances change which
could have a significant effect on these critical assumptions. In accordance with U.S. GAAP, actual
results that differ from the assumptions are accumulated and amortized over future periods.
Therefore, actual results generally affect recognized expenses and the recorded obligations for
pensions in future periods. While management believes that the assumptions used are appropriate,
differences in actual experience or changes in assumptions may affect our pension obligations and
future expenses.
54
We used a discount rate of 1.9% for the pension plan as of March 31, 2007. The discount rate
was determined by using the market yield of Japanese Government Bonds with a term matched against
the average remaining service period of employees.
We used an expected long-term rate of return on pension plan assets of 2.7% as of March 31,
2007. To determine the expected long-term rate of return on pension plan assets, we consider a
combination of historical returns and prospective return assumptions derived from pension trust
funds managing company. The actual return on pension plan for the year ended March 31, 2007 was
3.2%.
The following table illustrates the sensitivity to a change in the discount rate and the
expected return on pension plan assets, while holding all other assumptions constant, for our
pension plan as of March 31, 2007.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in Assumption |
|
Pre-Tax PBO |
|
Pension Expense |
|
Equity (Net of Tax) |
|
|
|
|
(millions of yen) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50 basis point increase/decrease in discount rate
|
|
(135)/150
|
|
(22)/27
|
|
13/(16) |
50 basis point increase/decrease in expected return on assets
|
|
|
|
(5)/ 5
|
|
/ (3) |
New Accounting Standards
In June 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued FASB Interpretations
(FIN) No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes, an interpretation of FASB statement
No. 109 (FIN No. 48) which clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in income tax recognized in
an enterprises financial statements in accordance with Statements of Financial Accounting
Standards (SFAS) No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes. This interpretation prescribes a
recognition threshold and measurement attribute for the financial statement recognition and
measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. This interpretation
also provides guidance on derecognition, classification, interest, and penalties, accounting in
interim periods, disclosure, and transition. FIN No. 48 is effective for fiscal years beginning
after December 15, 2006. The adoption of FIN No. 48 will not have a material effect upon the
Companys financial position or results of operations.
In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements, which defines fair
value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in generally accepted accounting
principles, and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. This Statement applies under
other accounting pronouncements that require or permit fair value measurements and is effective for
fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of
adopting this Statement.
In September 2006, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) staff published Staff
Accounting Bulletin No. 108, Considering the Effects of Prior Year Misstatements when Quantifying
Misstatements in Current Year Financial Statements (SAB No. 108). SAB No. 108 provides guidance
on the consolidation of the effects of prior year misstatements in quantifying current year
misstatements for the purpose of a materiality assessment. SAB No. 108 requires quantification of
the effects of financial statements errors on each of the balance sheets and statements of income
and the related financial statements disclosures. The Company adopted SAB No. 108 effective March
31, 2007. The adoption of SAB No. 108 did not have a material effect upon the Companys financial
position or results of operations.
In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 158, Employers Accounting for Defined Benefit
Pension and Other Postretirement Plans, an amendment of FASB statements No. 87, 88, 106 and 132(R)
(SFAS No. 158). SFAS No. 158 requires an employer that sponsors one or more defined benefit
pension plans or other postretirement plans to (1) recognize the funded status of a plan, measured
as the difference between plan assets at fair value and the benefit obligation, in its balance
sheet; (2) recognize in shareholders equity as a component of accumulated other comprehensive
income, net of tax, the gains and losses and prior
55
service costs or credits that arise during the
period but are not yet recognized as components of net periodic benefit cost; (3) measure defined
benefit plan assets and obligations as of the date of the employers fiscal year-end balance sheet; and (4) disclose in the notes to our
consolidated financial statements additional information about the effects on net periodic benefit
cost for the next fiscal year that arise from delayed recognition of the gains or losses, prior
service costs or credits, and transition asset or obligation. The Company adopted SFAS No. 158
effective March 31, 2007. The adoption of SFAS No. 158 resulted in a decrease in total
shareholders equity of ¥112 million ($950 thousand) as of March 31, 2007. For further information
regarding the impact of the adoption of SFAS 158, refer to Note 10 to our consolidated financial
statements.
In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets
and Financial Liabilities, which permits entities to choose to measure many financial instruments
and certain other items at fair value. This Statements objective is to improve financial reporting
by providing entities with the opportunity to mitigate volatility in reported earnings caused by
measuring related assets and liabilities differently without having to apply complex hedge
accounting provisions. SFAS No. 159 is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15,
2007. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of adopting this Statement.
|
|
|
B. |
|
Liquidity and Capital Resources. |
Liquidity and Capital Requirements
Our principal capital and liquidity needs in recent years have been for capital expenditures
for the development, expansion and maintenance of our network infrastructure, lease payments,
payment of principal and interest on outstanding borrowings, investments in current and former
group companies and, other working capital.
Capital expenditures. Our capital expenditures relate primarily to the development, expansion and
maintenance of our network. The table below shows our capital expenditures, which we define as
amounts paid for purchases of property and equipment plus acquisition of assets by entering into
capital leases, for the last three years.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the fiscal year ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
(millions of yen) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures, including
capitalized leases (1) |
|
¥ |
5,011 |
|
|
¥ |
4,762 |
|
|
¥ |
3,953 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Further information regarding capital expenditures, including capitalized leases and a
reconciliation to the most directly comparable U.S. GAAP financial measure, can be found in Item
3.A., Selected Financial Data Reconciliation of the Disclosed Non-GAAP Financial Measures to
the Most Directly Comparable GAAP Financial Measures. |
Most of our capital expenditures relate to the expansion and improvement of our existing
network, including the installation of the routers and servers necessary to offer services on our
network.
We have not made any material divestitures in the current or past three fiscal years. We
recorded a loss on disposal of property and equipment of ¥144 million, ¥119 million and ¥151
million for the fiscal years ended March 31, 2005, 2006 and
2007, respectively. The loss for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2005 was mainly due to the relocation of branch offices and disposal of
telephone rights. The loss for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2006 was mainly due to disposal of
software, such as back-office systems. The loss for the
56
fiscal year ended March 31, 2007 was mainly
due to the disposal of software, such as back-office systems and network equipment related to the
closing of a network operation center.
Lease payments. We have operating lease agreements with telecommunications carriers and others
for the use of connectivity lines, including our domestic and international backbone as well as
local access lines that customers use to connect to IIJs network. The leases for our domestic
backbone are generally non-cancelable for a minimum one-year lease period. The leases for our international backbone
connectivity during one-year lease period are substantially non-cancelable. We also lease office
premises and certain office equipment under non-cancelable operating leases which expire on various
dates through the year 2009 and also lease network operation centers under non-cancelable operating
leases.
Lease expenses related to backbone lines for the fiscal years ended March 31, 2005, 2006 and
2007, amounted to ¥3,551 million, ¥3,516 million and ¥3,516 million, respectively. Lease expenses
for local access lines for the fiscal years ended March 31, 2005, 2006 and 2007, which are only
attributable to dedicated access revenues, amounted to ¥4,040 million, ¥4,558 million and ¥4,616
million, respectively. Other lease expenses for the fiscal years ended March 31, 2005, 2006 and
2007, amounted to ¥3,304 million, ¥3,654 million and ¥4,382 million, respectively.
We conduct our connectivity and other services by using data communications and other
equipment leased under capital lease arrangements. The fair values of the assets at the execution
of the capital lease agreements and accumulated depreciation amounted to ¥14,459 million and ¥6,820
million at March 31, 2006 and ¥13,001 million and ¥6,102 million at March 31, 2007.
As of March 31, 2007, future lease payments under non-cancelable operating leases, including
the aforementioned non-cancelable connectivity lease agreements (but excluding dedicated access
lines which we charge outright to customers), and capital leases were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payment due by period |
|
|
|
|
(millions of yen) |
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
contractual |
|
|
Less than |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
More than |
|
|
|
amount |
|
|
1 year |
|
|
1 to 3 years |
|
|
4 to 5 years |
|
|
5 years |
|
Connectivity lines operating leases |
|
¥ |
134 |
|
|
¥ |
39 |
|
|
¥ |
76 |
|
|
¥ |
19 |
|
|
¥ |
|
|
Other operating leases |
|
|
2,226 |
|
|
|
1,468 |
|
|
|
680 |
|
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
40 |
|
Capital leases |
|
|
7,700 |
|
|
|
3,202 |
|
|
|
3,808 |
|
|
|
683 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total minimum lease payments(1) |
|
¥ |
10,060 |
|
|
¥ |
4,709 |
|
|
¥ |
4,564 |
|
|
¥ |
740 |
|
|
¥ |
47 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
See note 7 to our consolidated financial statements included in this annual report. |
Payments of principal and interest on outstanding borrowings. We require cash for
payments of interest and principal on our outstanding borrowings.
Short-term borrowings. As of March 31, 2007, our short-term borrowings consisted of bank
overdrafts of ¥6.1 billion. The weighted average interest rate of our short-term borrowings was
1.141%. We increased our short-term borrowings by ¥1.5 billion. We also had an unused balance of
¥13.4 billion in borrowings as of March 31, 2007 under our bank overdraft agreements.
Long-term borrowings. As of March 31, 2007, we had ¥0.3 billion of outstanding long-term
borrowings, all of which were current portions and which consisted of: unsecured, variable-rate
loans from banks of ¥40 million with a weighted average interest rate of 3.815% and unsecured,
variable-rate loans from banks of ¥250 million with a weighted average interest rate of 1.706%. We
entered into interest rate swap contracts to manage our interest rate exposure resulting in a fixed
interest rate for a portion of our long-term
57
debt. The effective weighted average interest rate for
¥250 million of the long-term loans outstanding at March 31, 2007 after giving effect to such swap
agreements was 1.670%.
Collateral for borrowings. Substantially all of our short-term and long-term borrowings are
made under agreements which, as is customary in Japan, provide that under certain conditions the
banks may require us to provide collateral or guarantees with respect to the borrowings. We did not
provide banks with any collateral for outstanding loans as of March 31, 2007. Our primary banking
relationships are with Sumitomo Mitsui Banking Corporation, Mizuho Corporate Bank, Ltd., Bank of
Tokyo-Mitsubishi UFJ, Ltd. and Mitsubishi UFJ Trust and Banking Corporation. The banks are also shareholders and
customers of ours.
Payable under securities loan agreement. Since August 2004, we had been a party to a
securities loan agreement with a Japanese financial institution. We loaned available-for-sale
securities to the financial institution and received cash in return in the transaction. These
transactions were accounted for as secured borrowings and the cash received was recorded as payable
under the securities loan agreement and securities lent were recorded as other investments. The
agreement required us to provide certain marketable securities as collateral at the commencement of
the transaction. We were required to make a partial payment or receive additional borrowings
depending on the market value of securities pledged. We paid the interest on the payables with a
variable rate. The interest rate was 0.76 percent as of March 27, 2007. On March 27, 2007, we paid
off the loan and took back the available-for-sale securities loaned to the financial institution
since the agreement expired on that date.
Investments in current and former group companies. In the past, we have made substantial
investments in current and former group companies. We may need to provide additional investment in
our group companies to enhance or maintain our business synergy with our affiliated companies in
the future. See Item 4.B., Our Group Companies for information on investment in equity method
investees.
Working capital needs. Our principal working capital requirements are for operating lease
payments for our domestic and international backbone and local access lines. We also require
working capital requirements for personnel expenses, office rents and other operating expenses.
Capital Resources
We seek to manage our capital resources and liquidity to provide adequate funds for current
and future financial obligations. We have traditionally met our capital and liquidity requirements
through cash flows from operating activities, long-term and short-term borrowings from financial
institutions, capital leases and issuances of equity securities. At March 31, 2007, we had cash of
¥13.6 billion and available-for-sale securities of ¥1.3 billion. We expect that cash from operating
activities, any proceeds from the sale of available-for-sale securities, our other sources of
liquidity will be sufficient to meet our requirements through the year ending March 31, 2008.
Short-term and long-term Borrowings. Short-term and long-term borrowings provide us with an
important source for maintaining adequate level of working capital, acquisition of fixed assets and
investments. We plan to continue to refinance our short-term borrowings or use the unused balance
outstanding of ¥13.4 billion as of March 31, 2007 of bank overdraft for maintaining adequate level
of working capital, acquisition of fix assets and investments. See Payments of principal and
interest on outstanding borrowings.
Cash flows from operating activities. We generated ¥7.4 billion by operating activities for
the year ended March 31, 2007. See Cash Flows.
Capital Leases. Capital leases also provide us with an important source of financing. See
note 7 to our consolidated financial statements included in this annual report on Form 20-F.
58
Issuances of Equity Securities. On December 2, 2005, we listed on the Mothers market of the
TSE. In connection with the listing, we issued 12,500 new shares of common stock for an amount of
¥6.0 billion.
Cash Flows
We had cash of ¥13.6 billion at March 31, 2007 compared to ¥13.7 billion at March 31, 2006.
The following table presents information about our cash flows during the fiscal years ended
March 31, 2005, 2006 and 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal year ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
(millions of yen) |
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
¥ |
5,238 |
|
|
¥ |
6,559 |
|
|
¥ |
7,402 |
|
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities |
|
|
1,974 |
|
|
|
1,805 |
|
|
|
(3,014 |
) |
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities |
|
|
(14,212 |
) |
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
(4,560 |
) |
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
(0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash |
|
|
(6,998 |
) |
|
|
8,441 |
|
|
|
(172 |
) |
Cash at beginning of the year |
|
|
12,284 |
|
|
|
5,286 |
|
|
|
13,727 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash at end of the year |
|
¥ |
5,286 |
|
|
¥ |
13,727 |
|
|
¥ |
13,555 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended March 31, 2007 as Compared to the Year Ended March 31, 2006
Net cash provided by operating activities was ¥7.4 billion for the fiscal year ended March 31,
2007 compared to ¥6.6 billion for the previous fiscal year. The increase of net cash provided by
operating activities for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2007 consisted of an increase of ¥1.2
billion in net income from continuing operations adjusted for non-cash income and expenses such as
depreciation and amortization, loss (gains) on other investments, and equity method net loss, and a
decrease of ¥0.3 billion in operating assets and liabilities (cash provided). This improvement in
cash provided by operating activities mainly resulted from the increase in operating income before
depreciation and amortization which was derived from an increase in revenues from value-added
services and systems integration.
Net cash used in investing activities was ¥3.0 billion for the fiscal year ended March 31,
2007 compared to ¥1.8 billion provided by investing activities for the previous fiscal year. Net
cash used in investing activities for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2007 reflected an increase of
¥2.9 billion in purchase of subsidiary stock from minority shareholders, an increase of ¥1.9
billion in purchase of short-term and other investments including available-for-sale securities and
an increase of ¥0.4 billion in purchase of property and equipment compared to the previous fiscal
year. The increase in net cash used in investing activities for the fiscal year ended March 31,
2007 was partly offset by an absence of investment in an equity method investee of ¥0.8 billion and
an increase of ¥0.6 billion in proceeds from sales of available-for-sale securities compared to the
previous fiscal year.
Net
cash used in financing activities was ¥4.6 billion for the fiscal year ended March 31,
2007 compared to ¥39 million provided by financing activities for the previous fiscal year. Net
cash used in financing activities for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2007 reflected an absence of
proceeds from issuance of common stock, net of an issuance cost, of ¥6.0 billion, an increase of
¥4.7 billion in repayments of short-term borrowings with initial maturities over three months and
long-term borrowings, a decrease of ¥3.8 billion in proceeds from securities loan agreement and an
increase of ¥3.2 billion in short-term borrowings compared to the previous fiscal year. The
increase in net cash used in financing activities for the fiscal year
59
ended March 31, 2007 was
partly offset by an increase of ¥9.5 billion in proceeds from issuance of short-term borrowings
with initial maturities over three months and long-term borrowings and a decrease of ¥3.6 billion
in repayments of securities loan agreement compared to the previous fiscal year.
Year Ended March 31, 2006 as Compared to the Year Ended March 31, 2005
Net cash provided by operating activities was ¥6.6 billion for the fiscal year ended March 31,
2006 compared to ¥5.2 billion for the previous fiscal year. The increase of net cash provided by
operating activities for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2006 consisted of an increase of ¥0.9
billion in net income from continuing operations adjusted for non-cash income and expenses such as
depreciation and amortization, gains on other investments, and equity method net loss, and an
increase of ¥0.4 billion in operating assets and liabilities (cash provided).This improvement in
cash provided by operating activities mainly resulted from the increase in operating income before
depreciation and amortization which was derived from an increase in revenues from value-added services and systems integration and the
decrease in backbone costs.
Net cash provided by investing activities was ¥1.8 billion for the fiscal year ended March 31,
2006 compared to ¥2.0 billion provided by investing activities for the previous fiscal year. The
decrease of net cash provided by investing activities for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2006
reflected primarily increases of ¥0.3 billion in purchases of property and equipment, ¥0.7 billion
in purchases of short-term and other investments and ¥0.8 billion in investment in an equity method
investee. The increase of cash
used was partly offset by an increase of ¥0.6 billion in proceeds from sales and redemption of
short-term and other investments, including certain available-for-sale securities, and an increase
of ¥0.5 billion in refunds of guarantee deposits.
Net cash provided by financing activities was ¥39 million for the fiscal year ended March 31,
2006 compared to ¥14.2 billion used in financing activities for the previous fiscal year. The
increase of net cash provided by financing activities for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2006
primarily reflected a redemption of convertible notes of ¥11.1 billion that was recorded in the
previous fiscal year, proceeds of ¥6.0 billion from the issuance of common stock related to our
listing on the Mothers market of the TSE, and an increase of ¥2.4 billion in proceeds from security
loan agreements. The increase was partly offset by an increase of ¥4.8 billion in repayments of
securities loan agreements, a decrease of ¥1.3 billion in proceeds from issuance of long-term
borrowings, and an increase of ¥1.1 billion in repayments of long-term borrowings.
Contingencies
We did not have any material contingent liabilities as of March 31, 2007.
C. Research and Development, Patents and Licenses, etc.
See the information in Item 4.B., Business Overview Research and Development.
D. Trend Information.
Factors Affecting Our Future Financial Results
We expect that the following are the most significant factors likely to affect our financial
results and those of our consolidated subsidiaries. You should also consult Item 3.D., Risk
Factors and the other portions of this annual report on Form 20-F for additional factors affecting
our financial results.
60
Revenues
We derive our revenues primarily from recurring monthly fees from our Internet connectivity
services and our value-added services, as well as one-time project fees and monthly operating fees
from systems integration services. We have been enhancing and will continue to enhance our Internet
connectivity services through the introduction of a greater variety of access options and bandwidth
options, by expanding our value-added services and systems integration under our total network
solutions strategy, and by focusing our efforts on capturing market share in high-end corporate
markets that are most attractive to us.
Connectivity and value-added services revenues
Connectivity and value-added services revenues consist of our dedicated access services
revenues, our dial-up access services revenues, our value-added services revenues and other
services revenues. Our connectivity and value-added services revenues accounted for 42.7% of our
revenues for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2007, 46.6% for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2006,
and 53.9% of our revenues for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2005. As our connectivity services
customers tend to use our value-added services or systems integration services as their network
needs develop, connectivity services are also important for the growth of our value-added services
or systems integration business.
Dedicated access services
Dedicated access services accounted for 18.9% of our revenues for the fiscal year ended March
31, 2007, 21.3% for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2006, and 27.3% for the fiscal year ended March
31, 2005. Dedicated access service revenues depend on the size of our customer base, the average
contracted bandwidth and unit price of our services. The market for dedicated access services is
generally following two trends:
|
|
|
Increased contracted bandwidth. Total contracted bandwidth for dedicated access
services including Internet Data Center Connectivity Services increased to 323.5 Gbps
for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2007 from 194.9 Gbps for the previous fiscal year.
The number of IP Service contracts for the bandwidth over 100Mbps increased to 224 for
the fiscal year ended March 31, 2007 from 157 for the fiscal year ended March 31,
2006. This increase is mainly due to an increase in customers demand for higher
bandwidth for their Internet connectivity. The average revenues per contract for IP
Service was approximately ¥0.6 million at the end of March 2007, compared to the
revenues per contract of ¥0.6 million at the end of March 2006. Though we do not
expect that revenue per contract come to a growing trend for the fiscal year ending
March 31, 2008 due to the continuing competition, we believe that customer demand for
higher bandwidth will continue as the use of broadband by corporate customers expands,
and we will try to acquire new customers and increase the bandwidth of existing
customers as well as maintain the quality of our services and differentiate them from
those of our competitors. |
|
|
|
|
Increased demand for broadband services. Demand for broadband services, IIJ
FiberAccess/F, IIJ DSL/F and IIJ DSL/A are increasing rapidly as the services are
coming to be used to connect corporate branches and remote offices. The services uses
ADSL lines at maximum 47 Mbps speed or optical lines at maximum 10 Mbps or 100 Mbps as
access lines. The number of contracts for IIJ FiberAccess/F and IIJ DSL/F increased to
16,418 for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2007 from 13,297 for the fiscal year ended
March 31, 2006. We also expect that it will also contribute to the increase of
value-added services and systems integration revenues as usage and implementation of
these connectivity services will increase the demand for value-added services such as
security services and network systems integration. |
61
Dial-up access services
Dial-up access services, which include both services for corporate customers and individual
users, accounted for 4.2% of our revenues for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2007, 5.4% for the
fiscal year ended March 31, 2006, and 7.0% for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2005. Dial-up
service revenues depend on the size of our customer base and pricing. The size of our customer base
depends primarily on the popularity of OEM services, and the attractiveness of our service
offerings which is measured primarily by the quality of service provided to subscribers and our
ability to attract new customers by offering remote access solutions in combination with dial-up
access and security services.
Although we also market some services under the IIJ name, due to our limited brand name
recognition among consumers not familiar with the Internet and our limited marketing budget, a
primary focus of our efforts to increase our revenues from individual consumers is our range of OEM
services. For example, Excite Japan markets and sells Internet connectivity services to individual
customers under their own names but provides such services through our Internet network
infrastructure.
Value-added services revenues
Our value-added services consist of network security services, data center facility services
and operation and management services. For the fiscal year ended March 31, 2007, value-added
services revenues increased to ¥7,416 million from ¥6,250 million for the fiscal year ended March
31, 2006 and from ¥5,005 million for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2005. The increase is
primarily due to the increasing demand for these services from our corporate connectivity
customers.
The growth of these services is primarily due to the increase in demand for security services
and network outsourcing services such as e-mail and web server hosting services. We expect that
business customers will continue to increase their usage of Internet as a business tool and will
increasingly rely on an expanding range of value-added services to enhance productivity, reduce
costs and improve service reliability. As a result, we expect our revenue from value-added services
to grow.
Other
Other revenues, which included rental fees for network equipment, customer support service,
and sale of Wide-area Ethernet services accounted for 6.5% of our revenues for the fiscal year
ended March 31, 2007, 7.4% for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2006, and 7.6% for the fiscal year
ended March 31, 2005.
Systems integration revenues, including related equipment sales revenues
We are currently targeting systems integration to drive growth in revenues and operating
income. Systems integration revenues, including related equipment sales revenues for the fiscal
year ended March 31, 2007 increased by 29.9% from the previous fiscal year. The increase is
primarily due to the steady increase in outsourced operation revenues, which are monthly recurring
revenues, and in one-time revenues due to the provision of a wider range of consulting, network and
system design, project management, implementation of integration compared to the past, such as
system utilizing broadband lines to connect customers shops or branches with lower cost and higher
speeds, or consulting on network design and operation, and network security. The increase in
revenues is primarily due to the increasing demand for these services from our connectivity
customers.
Due to the increase in monthly recurring revenues from outsourcing operations, we expect the
revenues from systems integration will continue show a stead increase annually, though the one-time
systems integration has the trend of seasonal fluctuation in the fiscal year. The primary seasonal
variations in systems integration revenues appear to relate to budgetary cycles of Japanese
companies and typically result in
62
greater revenues from systems integration at the end of the
fiscal year as companies attempt to complete large systems integration projects during those
periods. Systems integration revenues can fluctuate significantly, in accordance with the absence or addition of a single large order,
and are accordingly difficult to forecast.
Other equipment sales revenues
Our other equipment sales revenues consist primarily of sales of networking and other related
equipment, other than that provide in connection with our systems integration services. Other
equipment sales revenues can fluctuate significantly, in accordance with the absence or addition of
a single large order, and are accordingly difficult to forecast.
Additional factors affecting revenues
A number of other factors may affect demand for our services and in turn our revenues,
including overall increases in business usage of Internet and network solutions and our range of
service offerings.
|
|
|
Increase in business usage. Our revenues will be affected by the extent and speed
with which businesses in Japan exploit the Internet and network solutions to their
full potential, including, for example, electronic transactions between businesses and
expanding the range of devices that access the Internet. Such services require
high-quality and high-capacity connectivity services for both businesses and
individuals. Such services also require provision of total network solutions including
various Internet connectivity services, systems integration and other value-added
services which we believe we are well positioned to provide. The degree of business
usage will also depend upon a variety of factors including: |
|
|
|
technological advances, reliability of security systems and users familiarity
with and confidence in new technologies, |
|
|
|
|
the rate at which Japanese companies in certain industries significantly
increase their Internet usage, particularly the financial, manufacturing and
retail segments, and |
|
|
|
|
corporate budgets for expenditures for information technologies, including
Internet-related items. |
|
|
|
Range of service offerings. To increase our revenues from business users, we have
increased the access and connectivity options to include fiber optic lines and ADSL
lines. We have also completed our multi-site Internet data centers and expanded our
service offerings to include systems management and monitoring. We believe these steps
will allow us to sell a greater variety of services to our high-end corporate users
and to capture a greater amount of the current growth and demand. However, we will
still be strongly dependent on increasing acceptance of our services by large Japanese
companies and by increases in their Information Technology budgets. We expect Internet
usage to continue to grow rapidly in Japan and that businesses will continue to
diversify their uses of the Internet. Our ability to offer a broad range of services
to meet our customers demands will significantly influence our future revenues. |
|
|
|
|
Synergies between connectivity services, value-added services and systems
integration. Most of our systems integration customers become Internet connectivity
service customers as well, and we expect these relationships to continue. As part of
our systems integration business, we offer solution services for corporate information
network systems, consulting, project planning, system design and systems/operation
outsourcing or Internet VPN solution services which combines the FLETS Internet
connectivity services with the SEIL, adopted by customers who have multiple locations,
such as branches, offices and factories. The number of contracts |
63
|
|
|
concerning these
services is steadily increasing and we seek to enlarge these network integration
services with relatively high gross margin services. The ability to introduce a wide
range of services, including solutions necessary to build corporate
information network systems, like disaster recovery services and Internet VPN, Voice
over IP (VoIP), SEIL and the network service operating system SMF, wireless LAN, is an
important competitive factor. |
Costs and expenses
Costs and expenses include cost of connectivity and value-added services revenues, cost of
systems integration revenues and equipment sales, sales and marketing, general and administrative
and research and development expenses.
Cost of connectivity and value-added services revenues
Our primary cost of connectivity services and value-added services revenues is the leasing
fees that we pay for the leased lines which comprise our network and for the dedicated local access
lines that our subscribers use to connect with our network. Other primary components of our costs
are depreciation and amortization of capital leases for network equipment, personnel and other
expenses for technical and customer support staff and network operation center costs. Most of our
network equipment is leased rather than purchased to take advantage of the financing provided by a
capital lease arrangement.
We have invested heavily in the past few years in developing and expanding our network,
however, due to a decrease in procurement prices for international backbone lines, our costs have
decreased as a result. For the fiscal year ended March 31, 2007, our leased line and other
connectivity costs were equal to ¥8.5 billion or 34.8% of our connectivity and value-added services
revenues. For the previous fiscal year, these costs were equal to ¥8.9 billion, or 38.3% of our
connectivity and value-added services revenues.
|
|
|
Backbone cost. Backbone cost for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2007 was ¥3.5
billion, almost the same as the fiscal year ended March 31, 2006. We do not expect
that our backbone cost will increase significantly as compared with recent fiscal
years. |
|
|
|
|
Dedicated local access line costs. We collect dedicated local access line fees from
subscribers and pay these fees over to the carriers. Dedicated local access line costs
for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2007 were ¥4.6 billion, almost the same as the
fiscal year ended March 31, 2006. Other connectivity costs were ¥0.3 billion for the
fiscal year ended March 31, 2007 compared to ¥0.8 billion for the previous fiscal
year. |
Depreciation and amortization cost decreased to ¥2.6 billion for the fiscal year ended March
31, 2007 from ¥2.7 billion for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2006. Capital expenditures for the
fiscal year ended March 31, 2007 decreased to ¥4.0 billion from ¥4.8 billion for the fiscal year
ended March 31, 2006. We do not expect that the depreciation and amortization will change
significantly compared with recent fiscal years.
Costs of systems integration revenues and equipment sales
Our cost of systems integration revenues and equipment sales generally increases or decreases
in tandem with systems integration revenues and equipment revenues. In addition, as we incur
significant systems integration costs up front in connection with the provision of new types of
systems integration service or commencement of a systems integration project, our margins tend to
improve as the number of our customers grows and to the extent we provide ongoing systems
integration work for existing customers. The main determinant of whether our costs will be high
relative to our revenues is whether we are able to generate significantly higher margin systems
integration work. To do so, we must generate systems integration work that relies more heavily on
our engineering and technological expertise instead of systems integration work
64
that primarily
focuses on the delivery of networking equipment. By doing more planning, designing and
engineering-related work rather than just equipment procurement, we believe that not only will we
be able to increase our margins, but we will also be able to increase customer satisfaction and our subscriber retention and repeat business rates because we will be able to provide our
customers with advanced and cost-effective total Internet solutions.
Over the long term, we seek to improve gross margins through systems integration sales. The
gross margin ratio for systems integration services was 22.9% for the fiscal year ended March 31,
2007 in comparison with 22.9% for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2006. We seek to retain our
systems integration customers as our customers for higher-margin consulting, operation and
maintenance, software development and upgrades included in systems integration.
Sales and marketing
Our sales and marketing expenses consist primarily of costs related to marketing and general
advertising, written-off accounts receivable, sales and marketing and personnel expenses. Our sales
and marketing expenses will increase to the extent that we expand our operations and increase our
sales and marketing activities. We expect the sales and marketing expenses will increase for the
fiscal year ending March 31, 2008 in accordance with our business expansion.
General and administrative
Our general and administrative expenses include primarily expenses associated with our
management, accounting, finance and administrative functions, including personnel expenses. Our
general and administrative expenses will increase to the extent that we grow our business and add
staff. We expect the general and administrative expenses will increase for the fiscal year ending
March 31, 2008 in accordance with our business expansion.
Research and development
Our research and development expenses include primarily expenses associated with personnel
expenses related to research and development activities. Our research and development expenses will
increase to the extent that we expand our research and development activities. We expect the
research and development expenses will increase for the fiscal year ending March 31, 2008 in
accordance with our business expansion.
Other income (expenses)
Our other income and expenses include, interest income and expenses and other items such as
foreign exchange gains or losses, impairment losses on available-for-sale securities and gain on
sale of other investments.
|
|
|
Interest expense. Most of our interest expense is from bank borrowing and capital
leases. Interest income and interest expenses are also affected by the fluctuation of
market interest rates and our total amount of outstanding borrowings. As we increase
capital leases or borrowings in order to finance further development of our backbone
and data centers and for other investments, interest expenses will also increase. |
|
|
|
|
Impairment losses. We also hold other investments, including available-for-sale
securities. The book value of other investments are affected by the fluctuation in the
market price or the decrease in fair values of non-marketable investments. If a
decrease below cost in the market |
65
|
|
|
price or fair value of an investment is judged to be
other than temporary, we will have impairment losses on other investments. |
|
|
|
|
Gain on sale of other investments. Gain on sales of other investment is mostly
raised from a sale of available-for-sale securities. We expect that we will continue a
sale of available-for-sale securities to raise the gain for the fiscal year ending
March 31, 2008. |
E. Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements.
We do not have any off-balance sheet arrangements as is defined for purposes of Item 5.E. of
Form 20-F.
F. Tabular Disclosure of Contractual Obligations.
The following table shows our contractual payment obligations under our agreements as of March 31,
2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments due by period (in million of yen) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
more |
|
|
|
|
|
|
less than |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
than |
|
Contractual Obligations |
|
Total |
|
|
1 year |
|
|
1-3 years |
|
|
3-5 years |
|
|
5 years |
|
Long-term debt obligations |
|
¥ |
290 |
|
|
¥ |
290 |
|
|
¥ |
|
|
|
¥ |
|
|
|
¥ |
|
|
Capital lease obligations |
|
|
7,700 |
|
|
|
3,202 |
|
|
|
3,808 |
|
|
|
683 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
Operating lease obligations |
|
|
2,360 |
|
|
|
1,507 |
|
|
|
757 |
|
|
|
56 |
|
|
|
40 |
|
Total (1) (2) |
|
¥ |
10,350 |
|
|
¥ |
4,999 |
|
|
¥ |
4,565 |
|
|
¥ |
739 |
|
|
¥ |
47 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
In addition to the above, we plan to contribute ¥173 million to our pension plan for the
fiscal year ending March 31, 2008. On January 17, 2007, we
made an agreement for
investing in funds which invest in unlisted stocks mainly in Europe, Asia and Israel, with an
investment advisory company. We committed to provide $5 million for the fund at its request in
the future several years. We provided $140 thousand for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2007.
(Please refer to Note 14 to our consolidated financial statements). In June 2007, we acquired
100% of the equity of hi-ho, Inc. from Panasonic Network Services Inc. (PNS) to take over
PNSs Internet service business for personal users and its solution business for its corporate
customers for ¥1,200 million. |
|
(2) |
|
The table above does not include obligations for interest payments on debt. |
Item 6. Directors, Senior Management and Employees.
A. Directors and Senior Management.
The following table provides information about our directors, executive officers and company
auditors as of July 3, 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Initial date of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
appointment as |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
director, |
|
Number of IIJ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
executive officer |
|
shares owned |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current term |
|
or company |
|
as of July 3, |
Name |
|
Position |
|
Date of birth |
|
expires |
|
auditor |
|
2007 |
Koichi Suzuki
|
|
President, Chief
Executive Officer and
Representative Director
|
|
Sep. 3, 1946
|
|
June 2009
|
|
Dec. 1992
|
|
|
12,783 |
|
Toshiya Asaba
|
|
Executive Vice President
|
|
June 12, 1962
|
|
June 2009
|
|
June 1999
|
|
|
* |
|
Yoshiaki Hisamoto
|
|
Executive Vice President
|
|
Dec. 14, 1954
|
|
June 2008
|
|
June 2006
|
|
|
|
|
Hideshi Hojo
|
|
Senior Managing Director
|
|
Dec. 22, 1957
|
|
June 2009
|
|
June 2000
|
|
|
* |
|
66
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Initial date of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
appointment as |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
director, |
|
Number of IIJ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
executive officer |
|
shares owned |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current term |
|
or company |
|
as of July 3, |
Name |
|
Position |
|
Date of birth |
|
expires |
|
auditor |
|
2007 |
Takamichi Miyoshi
|
|
Director
|
|
May 5, 1963
|
|
June 2008
|
|
June 2002
|
|
|
* |
|
Akihisa Watai
|
|
Director, Chief
Financial Officer and
Chief Accounting
Officer
|
|
Sep. 30, 1965
|
|
June 2008
|
|
June 2004
|
|
|
* |
|
Hiroyuki Hisashima
|
|
Director
|
|
Oct. 11, 1959
|
|
June 2009
|
|
June 2005
|
|
|
* |
|
Kazuhiro Tokita
|
|
Director
|
|
Apr. 25, 1969
|
|
June 2009
|
|
June 2005
|
|
|
* |
|
Junichi Shimagami
|
|
Director
|
|
Apr. 17, 1967
|
|
June 2009
|
|
June 2007
|
|
|
* |
|
Yasurou Tanahashi
|
|
Director
|
|
Jan. 4, 1941
|
|
June 2008
|
|
June 2004
|
|
|
|
|
Takashi Hiroi
|
|
Director
|
|
Feb. 13, 1963
|
|
June 2008
|
|
June 2004
|
|
|
|
|
Yoshifumi Nishikawa
|
|
Director
|
|
Aug. 3, 1938
|
|
June 2009
|
|
June 2005
|
|
|
|
|
Junnosuke Furukawa
|
|
Director
|
|
Dec. 5, 1935
|
|
June 2009
|
|
June 2005
|
|
|
|
|
Senji Yamamoto
|
|
Director
|
|
Apr. 14, 1946
|
|
June 2008
|
|
June 2006
|
|
|
|
|
Junichi Tate
|
|
Company Auditor
|
|
Nov. 6, 1949
|
|
June 2008
|
|
June 2006
|
|
|
|
|
Masaki Okada
|
|
Company Auditor
|
|
Jan. 9, 1959
|
|
June 2008
|
|
June 2004
|
|
|
|
|
Masaaki Koizumi
|
|
Company Auditor
|
|
Oct. 4, 1964
|
|
June 2008
|
|
June 2004
|
|
|
|
|
Hirofumi Takahashi
|
|
Company Auditor
|
|
Sep. 1, 1939
|
|
June 2009
|
|
June 2005
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Owns less than 1% of outstanding shares of IIJs common stock. |
Koichi Suzuki has been our president and representative director since April 1994, and
has over 20 years of experience in the computer and communications industries. In addition, Mr.
Suzuki is chairman of IIJ Technology Inc. (IIJ-Tech) and hi-ho Inc. (hi-ho), and representative
director of Net Care, Inc. (Net Care), Internet Multifeed Co. (Multifeed) and GDX Japan, K.K.
He also serves as chairman of IIJ America Inc. (IIJ-A) and a director of i-Heart, Inc. From
December 1992 to April 1994, Mr. Suzuki was a director of IIJ. Prior to joining us, Mr. Suzuki was
employed at Japan Management Association where he served as a general manager.
Toshiya Asaba has served as an executive vice president and division director of the Network
Service Department since April 2006. Mr. Asaba is also a director of IIJ-A, Multifeed and NTT
Resonant Inc. Mr. Asaba was a managing director of IIJ from June 2002 to
June 2004. Mr. Asaba was an executive vice president and division director of the Solution
Department from June 2004 to March 2006. From April 1995 to June 1999, Mr. Asaba was a general manager of the Network
Engineering Division. Mr. Asaba joined us in 1992. Mr. Asaba has over ten years of Internet
experience including three years of Internet-related research experience and seven years of
Internet backbone engineering experience, including network design, routing and traffic management.
Yoshiaki Hisamoto has served as an executive vice president and as division director of the
Administrative Department since June 2006. Mr. Hisamoto joined Nippon Telegraph and Telephone
Public Corporation in April 1978 and was a senior manager of the Global Business Department and
Corporate Planning Department of NTT Communications Corporation (NTT Communications). Mr.
Hisamoto was general manager of the Accounts and Finance Department of NTT Communications.
Hideshi Hojo has served as senior managing director of IIJ since June 2006 and as division
director of the Sales Department since August 2003. Mr. Hojo is also a director of Net Care and
Internet Revolution Inc. (i-revo). From February 1998 to June 2000, Mr. Hojo acted as general
manager of the Sales Division, from June 2000 to June 2002, as a director and from June 2002 to
August 2003, as managing director and division director of the Sales & Marketing Department. Mr.
Hojo joined us in 1996. Prior to joining us, Mr. Hojo had 16 years of experience in the field of
sales working for the Itochu Group.
67
Takamichi Miyoshi has served as a director of IIJ since June 2002 and as director and
general manager of the Strategy Planning Division since April 2004. Mr. Miyoshi is a director of
Multifeed. Mr. Miyoshi joined us in April 1993. From October 1994, Mr. Miyoshi acted as general
manager of the Network Operations and Systems Administration Division.
Akihisa Watai has served as a director, chief financial officer and chief accounting officer
since June 2004. Mr. Watai is a director of Net Chart Japan Inc. (NCJ) and a company auditor of
i-revo. Mr. Watai joined The Sumitomo Bank, Limited (currently Sumitomo Mitsui Banking Corporation)
in April 1989 and was temporarily transferred to IIJ from August 1996. In February 2000, Mr. Watai
joined IIJ permanently and has been general manager of the Finance Division since April 2004.
Hiroyuki Hisashima has served as a director since June 2005 and has been division director of
the Applied Research and Development Department since April 2006. Mr. Hisashima is a director of IIJ-Tech. Mr. Hisashima was general manager
of the Technology Department since April 2004. Mr.
Hisashima joined us in May 1996. Prior to joining us, Mr. Hisashima had 12 years of experience in
the field of software development.
Kazuhiro Tokita has served as a director since June 2005 and has been division director of the
Solution Department since April 2006. Mr. Tokita is a director of IIJ-Tech. Mr. Tokita was a deputy division director of the Sales
Department since April 2005. Mr. Tokita joined us in May
1995. Prior to joining us, Mr. Tokita was employed at Yasuda Kasai Systems Co., Ltd (Currently
Sompo Japan Systems Solutions Inc.).
Junichi Shimagami was appointed a director in June 2007 and has been division director of the
Network Service Department since April 2007. Mr. Shimagami is a director of Multifeed and hi-ho.
Mr. Shimagami served as division director of the Network Engineering Section from April 2004 to
March 2007. Mr. Shimagami joined us in 1996. Prior to joining us, Mr. Shimagami worked at Nomura
Research Institute, Ltd., which he joined in April 1990.
Yasurou Tanahashi has served as an outside director of IIJ since June 2004. Mr. Tanahashi has
been an advisor of NS Solutions Corporation, an affiliated company of Nippon Steel Corporation
since June 2007. Mr. Tanahashi had been a representative director & president of NS Solutions
Corporation since April 2000 and had been chairman of NS Solutions Corporation since April 2003.
Takashi Hiroi has served as an outside director of IIJ since June 2004. Mr. Hiroi joined
Nippon Telegraph and Telephone Corporation (NTT) in April 1986 and has been a senior manager of
the Corporate Management Strategy Division of NTT since May 2005.
Yoshifumi Nishikawa has served as an outside director of IIJ since June 2005. Mr. Nishikawa
has been president and representative director of Japan Post Corporation since January 2006 and had
been a representative director of Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group, Inc. since December 2002.
Junnosuke Furukawa has served as an outside director of IIJ since June 2005. Mr. Furukawa has
been a advisor of The Furukawa Electric Co., Ltd. Mr. Furukawa had been a director, member of the
board & senior advisor of The Furukawa Electric Co., Ltd. since June 2004. From June 1995, Mr.
Furukawa had been President & CEO of The Furukawa Electric Co., Ltd. and from June 2003, Mr.
Furukawa had been Chairman & CEO of The Furukawa Electric Co., Ltd.
Senji Yamamoto has served as a director of IIJ since June 2006. Mr. Yamamoto has been vice
chairman and representative director of IIJ-Tech and president and representative director of IIJ
Financial Systems Inc. since June 2006. From June 2000 to October 2005, Mr. Yamamoto was President
and CEO of Sony Communication Network Corporation.
68
Junichi Tate has been a company auditor of IIJ since June 2006. Mr. Tate is a company auditor
of IIJ-Tech, Net Care, NCJ and hi-ho. Mr. Tate was a staff general manager of Corporate Planning
Department No.2 of Dai-Ichi Life Insurance Company.
Masaki Okada has been a company auditor of IIJ since June 2004. Mr. Okada has been admitted to
the Dai-ni Tokyo Bar Association and joined Ishii Law Office in April 1988. Mr. Okada has been a
partner in Ishii Law Office since April 1997.
Masaaki Koizumi has been a company auditor of IIJ since June 2004. Mr. Koizumi is a Japanese
Certified Public Accountant and joined Eiwa & Co. (Currently Azsa & Co.) in October 1987. Mr.
Koizumi retired from Azsa & Co. in September 2003 and established Koizumi CPA Office in October
2003.
Hirofumi Takahashi has been a company auditor of IIJ since June 2005. Mr. Takahashi is a
full-time company auditor of IIJ-Tech. Mr. Takahashi joined us in August 2002 as an Advisor. Prior
to joining us, Mr. Takahashi was chairman of Shinko Investment Trust Management. He had nearly 40
years of experience in securities companies.
B. Compensation.
For the fiscal year ended March 31, 2007, the aggregate compensation we paid or accrued for
all of our executive officers, directors and company auditors was approximately ¥458 million. We
established a retirement plan for full-time company auditors in March 2006 and a retirement plan
for full-time directors in March 2007. We recorded a liability for retirement benefits for company
auditors of ¥3 million and a liability for retirement benefits for standing directors and company
auditors of ¥ 201 million, which would be required if they retire as of March 31, 2006 and 2007,
respectively. For a description of our stock option and warrant issuances to directors and
employees, see Item 6.E.
C. Board Practices.
Directors are elected at a general meeting of shareholders, and the normal term of office of a
director is two years, although they may serve any number of consecutive terms. We do not have
audit or remuneration committees, a standard practice in Japan. We do not have any service
contracts with any of our directors providing for benefits upon termination of employment.
In accordance with the requirements of the Corporation Law of Japan, our Articles of
Incorporation provide for not more than three company auditors. Company auditors, of whom at least
half must be from outside of the company, are elected at a general meeting of shareholders, and the
normal term of office of a company auditor is four years, although they may serve any number of
consecutive terms. Company auditors are under a statutory duty to oversee the administration of our
affairs by the directors, to examine our financial statements and business reports to be submitted
by the Board of Directors to the general meetings of shareholders and to report their opinions
thereon to the shareholders, and to oversee accounting firms which audit our financial statements.
They are required to attend meetings of the Board of Directors and to express their opinions if
necessary, but they are not entitled to vote. Company auditors also have a statutory duty to
provide their report on the audit report prepared by our independent certified public accountants
to the Board of Company Auditors, which must submit its audit report to the Board of Directors
and/or the general meetings of shareholders. The Board of Company Auditors will also determine
matters relating to the duties of the company auditors, such as audit policy and methods of
investigation of our affairs.
Nasdaq Marketplace Rule 4350(a)(1) provides that a foreign private issuer may follow its home
country practice in lieu of the requirements of Rule 4350, provided that such foreign private
issuer discloses in its annual reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission each
requirement of Rule 4350 that
69
it does not follow and describes the home country practice followed
by the issuer in lieu of such requirements.
Nasdaq Marketplace Rule 4350(c) requires that (i) a majority of the Board of Directors be
independent directors as defined in Rule 4200(a)(15), (ii) independent directors have regularly
scheduled meetings at which only they are present, (iii) compensation of the chief executive
officer and other executive officers be determined, or recommended to the Board of Directors for
determination, either by a majority of the independent directors or by a compensation committee
comprised solely of independent directors, and (iv) director nominees be selected, or recommended
for selection by the Board of Directors, either by a majority of the independent directors or by a
nominations committee comprised solely of independent directors, in accordance with the nominations
process set forth in a formal written charter or board resolution. For large Japanese companies
under the Company Law of Japan (Large Japanese Companies), including us, which employ a corporate
governance system based on a Board of Company Auditors, Japans Company Law has no independence
requirement with respect to directors. As discussed above, the task of overseeing management and
accounting firms is assigned to the company auditors, who are separate and independent from the
companys management. Large Japanese Companies, including us, are required to have at least 50%
outside company auditor who must meet additional independence requirements under the Company Law.
An outside company auditor is defined in the Company Law as a company auditor who had not served as
a director, manager or any other employee of the company or any of its subsidiaries at any time
prior to the appointment. Currently, we have three outside company auditors.
Nasdaq Marketplace Rule 4350(d) requires that (i) each issuer have adopted a formal written
audit committee charter meeting the requirements of Rule 4350(d)(1) and (ii) the issuer have an
audit committee of at least three members who are independent as defined under Rule 4200(a)(15),
meet the independence criteria set forth in Rule 10A-3(b)(1) under the U.S. Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 and satisfy certain other criteria. Like a majority of Japanese companies, we employ the
company auditor system as described above. Under this system, the Board of Company Auditors is a
legally separate and independent body from the Board of Directors. The function of the Board of
Company Auditors is similar to that of independent directors, including those who are members of
the audit committee, of a U.S. company: to monitor the performance of the directors, and review and
express an opinion on the method of auditing by the companys accounting firm and on such
accounting firms audit reports, for the protection of the companys shareholders. Large Japanese
Companies, including us, are required to have at least three company auditors. Currently, we have
four company auditors. In addition, as discussed above, our company auditors serve a longer term
than our directors. With respect to the requirements of Rule 10A-3 under the U.S. Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 relating to listed company audit committees, we rely on an exemption under
paragraph (c)(3) of that rule which is available to foreign private issuers with boards of company
auditors meeting certain criteria.
Nasdaq Marketplace Rule 4350(f) provides that each issuer provide for a quorum as specified in
its by-laws for any meeting of holders of common stock, which shall be at least 33 1/
3% of the
outstanding shares of the issuers voting common stock. We provide for a quorum as specified in the
Articles of Incorporation for any meeting of holders of common stock, which shall be at least
one-third of our outstanding shares of the voting common stock.
Nasdaq Marketplace Rule 4350(g) provides that each issuer solicit proxies and provide proxy
statements for all meetings of shareholders and provide copies of such proxy solicitation to
Nasdaq. Currently a Japanese company whose shares are listed on the securities exchanges defined in
the Securities and Exchange Law, including us, may, but is not required to, solicit proxies for
meetings of shareholders. If such a Japanese company solicits proxies for a meeting of
shareholders, it is required to provide proxy statements and documents for reference as provided
for in the Securities and Exchange Law and provide copies of such proxy statements and documents
for reference to the Kanto Local Finance Bureau.
70
Nasdaq Marketplace Rule 4350(h) provides that each issuer conduct appropriate review of all
related party transactions for potential conflict of interest situations on an ongoing basis and
that all such transactions be approved by the issuers audit committee or another independent body
of the Board of Directors. Following the requirements of the Company Law of Japan, we require a
director to obtain the approval of the Board of Directors in order for such director to accept a
transfer of a product or any other asset of IIJ, to transfer a product or any other asset of such
director to IIJ, to receive a loan from IIJ, or to effect any other transaction with IIJ, for
himself or a third party.
Nasdaq Marketplace Rule 4350(i) provides that shareholder approval be obtained prior to the
issuance of designated securities under subparagraph (A), (B), (C) or (D) of Rule 4350(i). Where a
Japanese joint stock company (Kabushiki-Gaisha), issues common shares or other shares, stock
acquisition rights or bonds with stock acquisition rights under the Company Law of Japan, it is
necessary for the Board of Directors to determine the conditions of issuance; provided, however,
that this shall not apply if the Articles of Incorporation provide that such conditions shall be
determined by the shareholders meeting. Currently, IIJs Articles of Incorporation do not provide
for any such exception. Additionally, if the company issues such securities to persons other than
shareholders (in case of common shares or other shares) at a specially favorable issue price or (in
case of stock acquisition rights or bonds with stock acquisition rights) on specially favorable
conditions, even when there are provisions related thereto in the Articles of Incorporation, some
matters related to such issuance shall be resolved by special resolution of the shareholders
meeting.
The rights of ADR holders, including their rights relating to corporate governance practices,
are provided in the deposit agreement which is an exhibit to this annual report.
LIMITATION OF LIABILITIES OF SOME OUTSIDE DIRECTORS AND SOME OUTSIDE COMPANY AUDITORS
We have entered into an agreement with four of our outside directors, Mr. Yoshifumi Nishikawa,
Mr. Junnosuke Furukawa, Mr. Yasurou Tanahashi and Mr. Takashi Hiroi, and two of our outside company
auditors, Mr. Masaki Okada and Mr. Masaaki Koizumi that limits their liabilities to us for damages
suffered by us due to their acts taken in good faith and without gross negligence, amounting to ¥
10 million or the aggregate of the amounts set forth in Article 427 paragraph 1 of the Corporation
Law of Japan, whichever is higher.
D. Employees.
As of March 31, 2007, we had 1,155 employees, including employees of our consolidated
subsidiaries, and we had 987 employees as of March 31, 2006 and 969 employees as of March 31, 2005.
Approximately 70% of these employees were in our engineering division, 20% in our sales division
and 10% in our administrative division for each of the most recent three fiscal years.
Except for 16 employees in the United States employed by our subsidiary, IIJ-A, all of our
employees work in Japan.
We have never experienced any labor disputes and consider our labor relations to be good. To
our knowledge, none of our employees is a member of any union.
E. Share Ownership.
The information on share ownership required by this item is in Item 6.A. above.
71
Stock Option Plan
|
|
|
June 2001 Stock Option Plan. In June 2001, we implemented a stock option plan under
which 395 options to acquire a total of 1,975 shares or 790,000 ADS equivalents, or
approximately 1.8% of total outstanding shares on that date, were granted to 44
directors and employees on August 2, 2001. The option exercise price for the shares
was determined by setting the price 5% above the 30-days average of the closing market
prices beginning 45 days prior to the date of the grant which was ¥403,661 per share
and has been adjusted to ¥334,448 as a result of issuances of common shares. The
options are exercisable at various times from two years to ten years from the date of
grant. |
|
|
|
|
April 2000 Stock Option Plan. In April 2000, we implemented a stock option plan
under which our directors and employees were granted 295 options to acquire a total of
1,475 shares or 590,000 ADS equivalents, or approximately 1.2% of total outstanding
shares on that date. The options were granted to 34 directors and employees on May 31,
2000. The option exercise price was determined by setting the price at 5% above the
30-day moving average of closing market prices beginning 45 days prior to the date of
grant, which was ¥2,611,112 per share and has been subsequently adjusted to ¥2,163,418
as a result of issuances of common shares. The options are exercisable at various
times from two years to ten years from the date of grant. |
|
|
|
|
March 2001 Warrant Issuance. On March 31, 2001, certain directors of IIJ were
provided with 375 warrants exercisable for shares of common stock of IIJ-Tech. Each
warrant is exercisable for one share of common stock up to seven or eight years from
the date of grant at an exercise price of ¥300,000 and was purchased for 1% of the
exercise price. |
We conducted a 1 to 5 stock split effective on October 11, 2005. The numbers of shares and the
option exercise prices for the two stock option plans above are calculated based on the assumption
that the stock split was made at the time of implementation. For the two stock option plans above,
we had 515 unexercised options outstanding to acquire a total of 2,575 shares of common stock or
1,030,000 ADS equivalents.
Employee Stock Purchase Plan
We have an employee stockholding association that holds 1,353 shares of common stock, or 0.7%
of our outstanding shares, as of March 31, 2007. The association provides designated employees with
the opportunity to purchase shares at market value. Shares are held in the name of the employee
stock purchase program until the employee resigns or retires. The representative of the employee
shareholders association exercises voting rights in accordance with the instructions of each
employee shareholder.
Item 7. Major Shareholders and Related Party Transactions.
A. Major Shareholders.
The following table shows information regarding beneficial ownership of our common stock as of
March 31, 2007 by each shareholder known by us to own beneficially more than 5% of our common stock
and all directors and executive officers as a group. We are not required by Japanese law to
disclose beneficial ownership of our common stock. As explained in Reporting Requirements of
ShareholdersReport of Substantial Shareholdings in Item 10.B. of this annual report on Form
20-F, any person who becomes, beneficially and solely or jointly, a holder of more than 5% of our
outstanding common stock must file a report with the relevant local finance bureau of the Ministry
of Finance. The information in this table is based upon our shareholders of record and reports
filed with the Financial Services Agency and U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.
72
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares of common stock outstanding, |
|
|
beneficially owned as of March 31, 2007 |
|
|
Number |
|
Percentage |
Nippon Telegraph and Telephone Corporation and affiliates (1) |
|
|
60,675 |
|
|
|
29.7 |
% |
Koichi Suzuki |
|
|
12,532 |
|
|
|
6.1 |
|
Itochu Corporation |
|
|
10,430 |
|
|
|
5.1 |
|
Directors and executive officers as a group (2) |
|
|
13,317 |
|
|
|
6.5 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes Nippon Telegraph and Telephone Corporation (NTT), which owns 50,475 shares, or
24.7%, and NTT Communications Corporation (NTT Communications), which owns 10,200 shares, or
5.0%. |
|
(2) |
|
Includes Koichi Suzukis holding which is also separately set forth above. No other director
or executive officer is a beneficial owner of more than 5%. |
Our major shareholders have the same voting rights as other holders of our common stock.
According to our register of shareholders, as of March 31, 2007, there were 5,214 holders of
common stock of record worldwide. As of March 31, 2007, The Bank of New York, depositary for our
ADSs, held 13.4% of the outstanding common stock on that date. According to The Bank of New York,
as of March 31, 2007, there were eight ADR holders of record with addresses in the United States.
Because some of these shares were held by brokers or other nominees, the number of record holders
with addresses in the United States might not fully show the number of beneficial owners in the
United States. Of the 204,300 shares of common stock outstanding as of March 31, 2007, 27,409
shares were held in the form of 10,963,600 ADSs.
B. Related Party Transactions.
NTT-affiliated Companies. Since April 1, 2006 through March 31, 2007, we have paid ¥5,416
million for international and domestic backbone and local access line costs to NTT-affiliated
companies such as NTT Communications, Nippon Telegraph and Telephone East Corporation (NTT East)
and Nippon Telegraph and Telephone West Corporation (NTT West). In addition, we paid ¥2,215
million for co-location costs and telecommunication expenses to NTT Communications, NTT East and
NTT West and paid ¥95 million for other costs, mainly outsourcing costs to NTT Communications, NTT
East and NTT West. We received payments of ¥1,309 million for OEM services, Internet connectivity
services and operation fees for data centers from NTT Communications, NTT East and NTT West. On an
ongoing basis in the ordinary course of business, we pay NTT-affiliated companies for international
and domestic backbone and local access line costs and for co-location costs and telecommunications
expenses and receive payments from NTT-affiliated companies for OEM services, Internet connectivity
services and operating fees for data centers. We do not have any outstanding loans between NTT and
its affiliated companies and us.
Transactions with equity method affiliates. In the ordinary course of business, we have
various sales, purchase and other transactions with companies which are owned 20% to 50% by us and
are accounted for by the equity method. Account balances and transactions with such 20% to 50%
owned companies as of and for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2007 are presented as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
millions of yen |
Accounts receivable |
|
¥ |
44 |
|
Accounts payable |
|
|
16 |
|
Revenues |
|
|
482 |
|
Costs and expenses |
|
|
173 |
|
As of March 31, 2007, we had loans to an equity method investee of which the carrying amount,
net of valuation allowance was ¥35 million.
73
Except as described above, since March 31, 2005, there has been no transaction with or loan
between us or any of our subsidiaries and:
|
|
|
any enterprise that directly or indirectly controls, is controlled by, or is in common
control with us or any of our subsidiaries, |
|
|
|
|
any director, officer, company auditor or family member of any of the preceding or any
enterprise over which such person directly or indirectly is able to exercise significant
influence, |
|
|
|
|
any individual shareholder directly or indirectly having significant influence over
us or any of our subsidiaries or a family member of such individual or any enterprise
over which such person directly or indirectly is able to exercise significant influence,
or their respective family members or enterprises over which they exercise significant
influence, or |
|
|
|
|
any unconsolidated enterprise in which we have a significant influence or which has a
significant influence over us. |
C. Interests of Experts and Counsel.
Not applicable.
Item 8. Financial Information.
A. Consolidated Statements and Other Financial Information.
Financial Statements
The consolidated financial statements required by this item begin on page F-1.
Legal or Arbitration Proceedings
The information on legal or arbitration proceedings required by this item is in Item 4.B.
Dividend Policy
Our basic dividend policy is that we pay dividends to our shareholders continuously and in a
stable manner while considering the need to have retained earnings for the enhancement of financial
position, medium and long-term business expansion and new business development. Under Japanese law,
a company is required to have retained earnings, without accumulated deficit, in order to be able
to conduct certain types of capital-related transactions such as payments of dividends in general.
The ordinary general meeting of shareholders held on June 28, 2006 approved the elimination of
accumulated deficit through the reduction of additional-paid in capital and common stock in our
non-consolidated financial statements under generally accepted accounting principles in Japan. On
June 26, 2007, the ordinary general meeting of shareholders approved the payment of cash dividend
to shareholders of record at March 31, 2007 of ¥1,500 per share of common stock.
B. Significant Changes.
Except as otherwise disclosed in this annual report on Form 20-F, there has been no
significant change in our financial condition since March 31, 2007, the date of our last audited
financial statements.
74
Item 9. The Offer and Listing.
A. Offer and Listing Details.
American Depositary Shares (ADSs) representing our common stock have been quoted on the
Nasdaq market since August 4, 1999 under the symbol IIJI and were transferred from the Nasdaq
Global Market to the Nasdaq Global Select Market on June 11, 2007. The current ADS/share ratio is
400 ADSs per 1 share of our common stock. Our shares of common stock have been quoted on the
Mothers market of the Tokyo Stock Exchange (TSE) since December 2, 2005 under the stock code
number 3774 and were transferred to the First Section of the TSE on December 14, 2006.
The following table shows, for the periods indicated, the high and low price of our ADSs and
shares of common stock on the TSE for the periods indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nasdaq (1) |
|
TSE (1) (2) |
|
|
(per ADS) |
|
(per share of common stock) |
Fiscal year ended/ending March 31, |
|
High |
|
Low |
|
High |
|
Low |
2003 |
|
$ |
7.34 |
|
|
$ |
1.80 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 |
|
|
14.10 |
|
|
|
1.41 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
6.24 |
|
|
|
2.11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
14.88 |
|
|
|
3.04 |
|
|
¥ |
584,000 |
|
|
¥ |
409,000 |
|
First Quarter |
|
|
13.93 |
|
|
|
3.04 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Second Quarter |
|
|
11.12 |
|
|
|
7.31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Third Quarter |
|
|
14.88 |
|
|
|
8.45 |
|
|
|
548,000 |
|
|
|
484,000 |
|
Fourth Quarter |
|
|
12.99 |
|
|
|
8.67 |
|
|
|
584,000 |
|
|
|
409,000 |
|
2007 |
|
|
10.65 |
|
|
|
6.41 |
|
|
|
517,000 |
|
|
|
296,000 |
|
First Quarter |
|
|
10.65 |
|
|
|
6.41 |
|
|
|
517,000 |
|
|
|
296,000 |
|
Second Quarter |
|
|
8.85 |
|
|
|
6.83 |
|
|
|
425,000 |
|
|
|
315,000 |
|
Third Quarter |
|
|
9.63 |
|
|
|
7.33 |
|
|
|
431,000 |
|
|
|
358,000 |
|
Fourth Quarter |
|
|
10.38 |
|
|
|
8.33 |
|
|
|
516,000 |
|
|
|
402,000 |
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter |
|
|
9.98 |
|
|
|
7.45 |
|
|
|
473,000 |
|
|
|
351,000 |
|
Month |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 2007 |
|
|
9.32 |
|
|
|
8.33 |
|
|
|
455,000 |
|
|
|
402,000 |
|
February 2007 |
|
|
10.38 |
|
|
|
9.15 |
|
|
|
516,000 |
|
|
|
441,000 |
|
March 2007 |
|
|
10.20 |
|
|
|
8.98 |
|
|
|
477,000 |
|
|
|
417,000 |
|
April 2007 |
|
|
9.98 |
|
|
|
8.66 |
|
|
|
473,000 |
|
|
|
407,000 |
|
May 2007 |
|
|
9.08 |
|
|
|
7.45 |
|
|
|
438,000 |
|
|
|
351,000 |
|
June 2007 |
|
|
9.14 |
|
|
|
8.21 |
|
|
|
440,000 |
|
|
|
397,000 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Price data are based on prices throughout the sessions for each corresponding period at each
stock exchange. |
|
(2) |
|
The high and low price of our shares of common stock on the TSE for the fiscal year ended
March 31, 2006 and the third quarter of the fiscal year ended March 31, 2006 show the high and
low price for the period on and after December 2, 2005, when we listed on the Mothers market
of the TSE. |
B. Plan of Distribution.
Not applicable.
75
C. Markets.
ADSs representing our common stock have been quoted on the Nasdaq Market since August 4, 1999
under the symbol IIJI and on June 11, 2007 were transferred from the Nasdaq Global Market to the
Nasdaq Global Select Market. Our shares of common stock have been quoted on the Mothers market of
the TSE since December 2, 2005 under the stock code number 3774 and were transferred to the First
Section of the TSE on December 14, 2006.
D. Selling Shareholders.
Not applicable.
E. Dilution.
Not applicable.
F. Expenses of the issue.
Not applicable.
Item 10. Additional Information.
A. Share Capital.
Not required.
B. Memorandum and Articles of Association.
Objects and Purposes in Our Articles of Incorporation
Article 2 of our Articles of Incorporation states our objects and purposes:
|
|
|
Telecommunications business under the Telecommunications Business Law, |
|
|
|
|
Processing, mediation and provision of information and contents by using
telecommunications networks, |
|
|
|
|
Agency for the management business such as the management of networks and the
management of information and telecommunications systems, |
|
|
|
|
Planning, consulting service, development, operation and maintenance of or for
information and telecommunications systems, |
|
|
|
|
Development, sales, lease and maintenance of computer software, |
|
|
|
|
Development, sales, lease and maintenance of telecommunications machinery and
equipment, |
|
|
|
|
Telecommunications construction, |
|
|
|
|
Agency for non-life insurance,
|
76
|
|
|
Research, study, education and training related to the foregoing, and |
|
|
|
|
Any and all businesses incidental or related to the foregoing. |
Provisions Regarding Our Directors
There is no provision in our Articles of Incorporation as to a directors power to vote on a
proposal, arrangement or contract in which the director is materially interested, but the
Corporation Law of Japan provides that such director is required to refrain from voting on such
matters at the Board of Directors meetings.
The Corporation Law of Japan provides that compensation for directors is determined at a
general meeting of shareholders of a company. Within the upper limit approved by the shareholders
meeting, the Board of Directors will determine the amount of compensation for each director. The
Board of Directors may, by its resolution, leave such decision to the presidents discretion.
The Corporation Law of Japan provides that a significant loan from third party by a company
should be approved by the Board of Directors. Our regulations of the Board of Directors have
adopted this policy.
There is no mandatory retirement age for directors under the Corporation Law of Japan or our
Articles of Incorporation.
There is no requirement concerning the number of shares one individual must hold in order to
qualify him or her as a director under the Corporation Law of Japan or our Articles of
Incorporation.
Rights of Shareholders of our Common Stock
We have issued only one class of shares, our common stock. Rights of holders of shares of our
common stock have under the Corporation Law of Japan and our Articles of Incorporation include:
|
|
|
the right to receive dividends when the payment of dividends has been approved at a
shareholders meeting, with this right lapsing three full years after the due date for
payment according to a provision in the Articles, |
|
|
|
|
the right to receive interim dividends as provided for in the Articles, with this
right lapsing three full years after the due date for payment according to a provision
in the Articles, |
|
|
|
|
the right to vote at a shareholders meeting (cumulative voting is not allowed
under the Articles), |
|
|
|
|
the right to receive surplus in the event of liquidation, and |
|
|
|
|
the right to require us to purchase shares when a shareholder opposes resolutions
including (i) the transfer of all or material part of the business, (ii) an amendment
of the Articles to establish a restriction on share transfer, (iii) a share exchange
or share transfer to establish a holding company, (iv) split of the company or (v)
merger, all of which must be consummated by a two-thirds affirmative vote of the
voting rights of the shareholders at a shareholders meeting at which shareholders
having not less than one-third of the total number of voting rights held by all
shareholders who can exercise their voting rights are in attendance.
|
77
A shareholder is generally entitled to one vote per one unit of our shares at a shareholders
meeting. In general, under the Corporation Law of Japan and our Articles of Incorporation, a
shareholders meeting may adopt a resolution by a majority of the voting rights represented at the
meeting. The Corporation Law of Japan and our Articles of Incorporation require a quorum for the
election of directors and company auditors of not less than one-third of the total number of voting
rights held by all shareholders who can exercise their voting rights. A corporate shareholder,
having more than one-quarter of its voting rights directly or indirectly held by us, does not have
voting rights. We have no voting rights with respect to our own common stock. Shareholders may
exercise their voting rights through proxies, provided that a shareholder may appoint only one
shareholder who has a voting right as its proxy. Our Board of Directors may entitle our
shareholders to cast their votes in writing. Our Board of Directors may also entitle our
shareholders to cast their votes by electrical devices.
While the Corporation Law of Japan, in general, requires a quorum of the majority of voting
rights and approval of two-thirds of the voting rights presented at the meeting of any material
corporate actions, it allows a company to reduce the quorum for such special resolutions by its
Articles of Incorporation to not less than one-third of the total number of voting rights held by
all shareholders who can exercise their voting rights. We adopted a quorum of not less than
one-third of the total number of voting rights in our Articles of Incorporation for special
resolutions for material corporate actions, such as:
|
|
|
a reduction of the stated capital, |
|
|
|
|
amendment of our Articles of Incorporation (except amendments that the Board of
Directors are authorized to make under the Corporation Law of Japan), |
|
|
|
|
establishment of a 100% parent-subsidiary relationship through a share exchange or
share transfer requiring shareholders approval, |
|
|
|
|
a dissolution, merger or consolidation requiring shareholders approval, |
|
|
|
|
a company split requiring shareholders approval, |
|
|
|
|
a transfer of the whole or an important part of our business, |
|
|
|
|
the taking over of the whole of the business of any other corporation requiring
shareholders approval, and |
|
|
|
|
issuance of new shares at a specially favorable price, or issuance of stock
acquisition rights or bonds with stock acquisition rights with specially favorable
conditions to persons other than shareholders. |
The Corporation Law of Japan provides additional specific rights for shareholders owning a
substantial number of voting rights.
Shareholders holding more than one sixth of the total number of the voting rights of all
shareholders who can exercise their voting rights have the right to oppose:
|
|
|
short-form share transfer (only in respect of the shareholders of the company to be
a 100% parent company by the short-form share transfer), |
|
|
|
|
short-form company split into an existing company (only in respect of the
shareholders of the exiting company that takes over the target business of the split
company), and |
78
|
|
|
short-form absorption (only in respect of the shareholders of the exiting company
that absorbs the target company by the short-form absorption). |
Shareholders holding 10% or more of the total number of voting rights of all shareholders (or
our total outstanding shares) have the right to apply to a court of competent jurisdiction, or
competent court, for:
|
|
|
dissolution, and |
|
|
|
|
commencement of reorganization proceedings as provided for in the Company
Reorganization Law of Japan. |
Shareholders who have held 3% or more of the total number of voting rights of all shareholders
(or our total outstanding shares) for six months or more have the right to:
|
|
|
demand the convening of a general meeting of shareholders, |
|
|
|
|
apply to a competent court for removal of a director or company auditor, |
|
|
|
|
apply to a competent court for removal of a liquidator, and |
|
|
|
|
apply to a competent court for an order to inspect our business and assets in a
special liquidation proceeding. |
Shareholders holding 3% or more of the total number of voting rights of all shareholders (or
our total outstanding shares) have the right to:
|
|
|
examine our accounting books and documents and make copies of them, and |
|
|
|
|
apply to a competent court for appointment of an inspector to inspect our operation
or financial condition. |
Shareholders who have held 1% or more of the total number of voting rights of all shareholders
for six months or more have the right to apply to a competent court for appointment of an inspector
to review the correctness of the convocation and voting procedures of a general meeting of
shareholders.
Shareholders who have held 1% or more of the total number of voting rights of all shareholders
or 300 voting rights for six months or more have the right to demand that certain matters be made
objects and added to the agenda items at a general meeting of shareholders.
Shareholders who have held any number of shares for six months or more have the right to
demand:
|
|
|
us to institute an action to enforce the liability of one of our directors or
company auditors, |
|
|
|
|
us to institute an action to recover from a recipient the benefit of a proprietary
nature given in relation to exercising the right of a shareholder, and |
|
|
|
|
a director on our behalf for the cessation of an illegal or ultra vires action. |
There is no provision under the Corporation Law of Japan or our Articles of Incorporation
which forces shareholders to make additional contributions when requested by us.
79
Under the Corporation Law of Japan, in order to change the rights of shareholders which are
stipulated and defined in our Articles of Incorporation, we must amend our Articles of
Incorporation. Amendment must be approved by a special resolution of shareholders where two-thirds
of shareholders vote at a shareholders meeting at which shareholders having not less than
one-third of the voting rights held by all shareholders are in attendance.
Annual general meetings and extraordinary general meetings of shareholders are convened by a
representative director based on the determination to convene it by our Board of Directors. A
shareholder having held 3% or more of our total outstanding shares for six months or more is
entitled to demand the directors to convene a shareholders meeting under the Corporation Law of
Japan. Under our Articles of Incorporation, shareholders of record as of March 31 of each year have
the right to attend the annual general meeting of our shareholders. In order to determine the
shareholders entitled to attend extraordinary general meetings of our shareholders, we are required
to make public notice of record date at least two weeks prior to the record date. A convocation
notice will be sent to these shareholders at least two weeks prior to the date of the shareholders
meeting.
Restrictions on Holders of our Common Stock
There is no restriction on non-resident or foreign shareholders on the holding of our shares
or on the exercise of voting rights. However, pursuant to a provision of our share handling
regulations, a shareholder who does not have an address or residence in Japan is required to file
its temporary address in Japan or that of a standing proxy having any address or residence in Japan
with our transfer agent.
There is no provision in our Articles of Incorporation that would have the effect of delaying,
deferring or preventing a change in control that would operate only with respect to a merger,
acquisition or corporate restructuring involving us.
There is no provision in our Articles of Incorporation or other subordinated rules regarding
the ownership threshold, above which shareholder ownership must be disclosed. A shareholder holding
more than 5% of the shares in a public company in Japan is required to disclose such shareholding
pursuant to the Securities Exchange Law of Japan.
There is no provision in our Articles of Incorporation governing changes in the capital more
stringent than is required by law.
For a description of rights of holders of ADSs, please see the Description of American
Depositary Receipts section in our F-1 Registration Statement (File No. 333-10584), declared
effective on August 3, 1999, as amended, hereby incorporated by reference.
C. Material Contracts.
The following are summaries of our material contracts, other than those we entered into in the
ordinary course of business.
Limitation of Liability Agreements dated, June 28, 2006 and June 26, 2007, between Internet
Initiative Japan Inc. and outside directors and outside company auditors. We entered into a
Limitation of Liability Agreement with Mr. Yasurou Tanahashi and Mr. Takashi Hiroi as our outside
directors and Mr. Masaki Okada and Mr. Masaaki Koizumi as our outside company auditors on June 28,
2006, and with Mr. Yoshifumi Nishikawa and Mr. Junnosuke Furukawa as our outside directors on June
26, 2007, respectively, under which we limit the liability of outside directors and outside company
auditors in accordance to the rules defined in Article 427 of the Corporation Law of Japan.
80
D. Exchange Controls.
There are no laws, decrees, regulations or other legislation in Japan that affect either our
ability to import or export capital for our use or our ability to pay dividends to non-resident
holders of our securities.
E. Taxation.
Japanese Taxation
The following is a discussion summarizing material Japanese tax consequences to an owner of
shares or ADSs who is a non-resident of Japan or a non-Japanese corporation without a permanent
establishment in Japan to which the relevant income is attributable. The statements regarding
Japanese tax laws set forth below are based on the laws in force and as interpreted by the Japanese
taxation authorities as at the date hereof. These statements are subject to changes in the
applicable Japanese laws or double taxation conventions occurring after that date. This summary is
not exhaustive of all possible tax considerations which may apply to a particular investor.
Potential investors should satisfy themselves as to:
|
|
|
the overall tax consequences of the ownership and disposition of shares or ADSs,
including specifically the tax consequences under Japanese law, |
|
|
|
|
the laws of the jurisdiction of which they are resident, and |
|
|
|
|
any tax treaty between Japan and their country of residence, by consulting their
own tax advisers. |
Generally, a non-resident of Japan or a non-Japanese corporation is subject to Japanese
withholding tax on dividends paid by Japanese corporations. Stock splits, except when treated as
dividends in certain conditions, are not subject to Japanese income tax.
The Convention between the Government of Japan and the Government of the United States of
America for the Avoidance of Double Taxation and the Prevention of Fiscal Evasion with Respect to
Taxes on Income (the Treaty) was newly signed on November 7, 2003 and the Treaty entered into
force on March 30, 2004. Upon the Treaty coming into force, the Convention between Japan and the
United States of America for the Avoidance of Double Taxation and the Prevention of Fiscal Evasion
with Respect to Taxes on Income, signed on March 8, 1971 (the Prior Treaty) ceased to have
effect. The Treaty reduces the maximum rate of Japanese withholding tax which may be imposed on dividends paid to a
United States resident or corporation not having a permanent establishment in Japan. A permanent
establishment in Japan is generally a fixed place of business for industrial or commercial
activity in Japan. With respect to taxes withheld at source, the Treaty is applicable for amount
taxable on or after July 1, 2004. The other provisions of the Treaty are applicable to the fiscal
year beginning on or after January 1, 2005.
Under the Treaty, the maximum withholding rate for most shareholders is limited to 10% of the
gross amount actually distributed. However, the maximum rate is 5% of the gross amount actually
distributed, if the recipient is a corporation that owns directly or indirectly, on the date on
which entitlement to the dividends is determined, at least 10% of the voting shares of the paying
corporation. Moreover, withholding tax on dividends is not imposed, if the recipient is
|
|
|
a corporation that has owned, directly or indirectly through one or more residents
of either Japan or the U.S., more than 50% of the voting shares of the paying
corporation for the period of twelve months ending on the date on which entitlement to
the dividends is determined and which meets additional requirements, or |
81
|
|
|
a pension fund, provided that such dividends are not derived from the carrying on
of a business, directly or indirectly, by such pension fund. |
The following table summarizes changes of the maximum withholding rate imposed on dividends by
the Treaty:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Prior Treaty |
|
|
|
The Treaty |
|
|
10% or more of the voting shares |
|
10% |
|
More than 50% of the voting shares |
|
0% |
|
|
|
|
10% to 50% of the voting shares |
|
5% |
Others |
|
15% |
|
Others |
|
10% |
For purposes of the Treaty and Japanese tax law, U.S. holders of ADRs will be treated as the
owners of the shares underlying the ADSs evidenced by the ADRs.
Unless an applicable tax treaty, convention or agreement reduces the maximum rate of
withholding tax, the rate of Japanese withholding tax applicable to dividends paid by Japanese
corporations to a non-resident or non-Japanese corporation is 20%. Japan has entered into income
tax treaties, conventions or agreements, reducing the above-mentioned withholding tax rate for
investors with a number of countries. These countries include, among others, Australia, Belgium,
Canada, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, New
Zealand, Norway, Singapore, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, and the United Kingdom. The withholding tax
rate is further reduced if investors and IIJ have some capital relationship as provided for in an
applicable tax treaty.
Non-resident holders who are entitled to a reduced rate of Japanese withholding tax on payment
of dividends by IIJ must submit the required form in advance through IIJ to the relevant tax
authority before payment of dividends. The required form is the Application Form for Income Tax
Convention regarding Relief from Japanese Income Tax on Dividends. A standing proxy for
non-resident holders may provide such application service. See Description of Capital Stock
General. With respect to ADSs, the reduced rate is applicable if The Bank of New York, as
depositary, or its agent submits two Application Forms for Income Tax Convention one form must
be submitted before payment of dividends, and the other form must be submitted within eight months
after our fiscal year end. To claim the reduced rate, a non-resident holder of ADSs will be
required to file proof of taxpayer status, residence and beneficial ownership, as applicable. The
non-resident holder will also be required to provide information or documents clarifying its
entitlement to the tax reduction as may be required by the depositary.
A non-resident holder of shares or ADSs who does not submit an application in advance will be
entitled to claim from the relevant Japanese tax authority a refund of withholding taxes withheld
in excess of the rate of an applicable tax treaty.
Gains derived from the sale outside Japan of the shares or ADSs by a non-resident of Japan or
a non-Japanese corporation are in general not subject to Japanese income or corporation taxes. In
addition, gains derived from the sale of shares or ADSs within Japan by a non-resident of Japan or
non-Japanese corporation not having a permanent establishment in Japan are in general not subject
to Japanese income or corporation taxes. An individual who has acquired shares or ADSs as a
distributee, legatee or donee may have to pay Japanese inheritance and gift taxes at progressive
rates.
IIJ has paid or will pay any stamp, registration or similar tax imposed by Japan in connection
with the issue of the shares, except that IIJ will not pay any tax payable in connection with the
transfer or sale of the shares by a holder thereof.
82
United States Taxation
The following discusses United States federal income tax consequences of the ownership of
shares or ADSs. It only applies to U.S. holders of shares or ADSs, as defined below, who hold their
shares or ADSs as capital assets for tax purposes. It does not address special classes of holders,
some of whom may be subject to other rules including:
|
|
|
tax-exempt entities, |
|
|
|
|
life insurance companies, |
|
|
|
|
dealers in securities, |
|
|
|
|
traders in securities that elect to use a mark-to-market method of accounting for
securities holdings, |
|
|
|
|
investors liable for alternative minimum tax, |
|
|
|
|
investors that actually or constructively own 10% or more of the voting stock of IIJ, |
|
|
|
|
investors that hold shares or ADSs as part of a straddle or a hedging or conversion
transaction, or |
|
|
|
|
investors whose functional currency is not the U.S. dollar. |
This discussion is based on the tax laws of the United States, including the Internal Revenue
Code of 1986, as amended, its legislative history, existing and proposed regulations and
administrative and judicial interpretations, as currently in effect, as well as on the Treaty.
These laws are subject to change, possibly on a retroactive basis. In addition, this discussion is
based in part upon the representations of the depositary and the assumption that each obligation in
the deposit agreement relating to the ADRs and any related agreement will be performed in
accordance with its terms.
For purposes of this discussion, a U.S. holder is a beneficial owner of shares or ADSs that is:
|
|
|
a citizen or resident of the United States, |
|
|
|
|
a domestic corporation, |
|
|
|
|
an estate whose income is subject to United States federal income tax regardless of
its source, or |
|
|
|
|
a trust if a United States court can exercise primary supervision over the trusts
administration and one or more United States persons are authorized to control all
substantial decisions of the trust. |
This discussion addresses only United States federal income taxation. You should consult your
own tax advisor regarding the United States federal, state and local and other tax consequences of
owning and disposing of shares and ADSs in your particular circumstances.
In general, and taking into account the earlier assumptions, for United States federal income
tax purposes, if you hold ADRs evidencing ADSs, you will be treated as the owner of the shares
represented by
83
those ADSs. Exchanges of shares for ADRs, and ADRs for shares, generally will not be
subject to United States federal income tax.
The discussion under the headings Taxation of Dividends and Taxation of Capital Gains
assumes that we will not be treated as a passive foreign investment company (PFIC) for U.S. federal
income tax purposes. For a discussion of the rules that apply if we are treated as a PFIC, see the
discussion under the heading PFIC Rules below.
Taxation of Dividends
Under the United States federal income tax laws, if you are a U.S. holder, the gross amount of
any dividend we pay out of our current or accumulated earnings and profits (as determined for
United States federal income tax purposes) is subject to United States federal income taxation. If
you are a noncorporate U.S. holder, dividends paid to you in taxable years beginning before January
1, 2011 that constitute qualified dividend income will be taxable to you at a maximum tax rate of
15% provided that you hold the shares or ADSs for more than 60 days during the 121-day period
beginning 60 days before the ex-dividend date and meet other holding period requirements.
You must include any Japanese tax withheld from the dividend payment in this gross amount even
though you do not in fact receive it. The dividend is taxable to you when you, in the case of
shares, or the Depositary, in the case of ADSs, receive the dividend, actually or constructively.
The dividend will not be eligible for the dividends-received deduction generally allowed to United
States corporations in respect of dividends received from other United States corporations. The
amount of the dividend distribution that you must include in your income as a U.S. holder will be
the U.S. dollar value of the Japanese yen payments made, determined at the spot Japanese yen/U.S.
dollar rate on the date the dividend distribution is includible in your income, regardless of
whether the payment is in fact converted into U.S. dollars. Generally, any gain or loss resulting
from currency exchange fluctuations during the period from the date you include the dividend
payment in income to the date you convert the payment into U.S. dollars will be treated as ordinary
income or loss and will not be eligible for the special tax rate applicable to qualified dividend
income. The gain or loss generally will be income or loss from sources within the United States for
foreign tax credit limitation purposes.
Distributions in excess of current and accumulated earnings and profits, as determined for
United States federal income tax purposes, will be treated as a return of capital to the extent of
your basis in the shares or ADSs and thereafter as capital gain.
Subject to certain limitations, the Japanese tax withheld in accordance with the Treaty and
paid over to Japan will be creditable or deductible against your United States federal income tax
liability. Special rules apply in determining the foreign tax credit limitation with respect to
dividends that are subject to the maximum 15% tax rate. To the extent a refund of the tax withheld
is available to you under Japanese law or under the Treaty, the amount of tax withheld that is
refundable will not be eligible for credit against your United States federal income tax liability.
Dividends constitute income from sources outside the United States, but dividends paid in
taxable years beginning before January 1, 2007 generally will be passive or financial services
income, and dividends paid in taxable years beginning after December 31, 2006 will, depending on
your circumstances, be passive or general income which, in either case, is treated separately
from other types of income for purposes of computing the foreign tax credit allowable to you.
84
Taxation of Capital Gains
If you sell or otherwise dispose of your shares or ADSs, you will recognize capital gain or
loss for United States federal income tax purposes equal to the difference between the U.S. dollar
value of the amount that you realize and your tax basis, determined in U.S. dollars, in your shares
or ADSs. Capital gain of a noncorporate U.S. holder that is recognized in taxable years beginning
before January 1, 2011 is generally taxed at a maximum rate of 15% where the holder has a holding
period greater than one year. Additionally, gain or loss will generally be from sources within the
United States for foreign tax credit limitation purposes.
PFIC Rules
We do not believe that we will be treated as a PFIC for United States federal income tax
purposes for our most recent taxable year. However, this conclusion is a factual determination made
annually and thus may be subject to change. Because of the nature of our income and assets, we
could be determined to be a PFIC for our current and subsequent taxable years.
In general, we will be a PFIC with respect to you if for any of our taxable years in which you
held our ADSs or shares:
|
|
|
at least 75% of our gross income for the taxable year is passive income, or |
|
|
|
|
at least 50% of the value, determined on the basis of a quarterly average, of our
assets is attributable to assets that produce or are held for the production of
passive income. |
Passive income generally includes dividends, interest, royalties, rents (other than certain
rents and royalties derived in the active conduct of a trade or business), annuities and gains from
assets that produce passive income. If a foreign corporation owns at least 25% by value of the
stock of another corporation, the foreign corporation is treated for purposes of the PFIC tests as
owning its proportionate share of the assets of the other corporation, and as receiving directly
its proportionate share of the other corporations income.
We believe that more than 25% of our gross income is not passive income and that, based upon
our earnings history and projected market capitalization, we possess sufficient active assets,
including intangible assets, such that more than 50% of the value of our assets is attributable to
assets that produce or are held for the production of active income.
If we are treated as a PFIC and you did not make a mark-to-market election, as described
below, you will be subject to special rules with respect to:
|
|
|
any gain you realize on the sale or other disposition of your shares or ADSs, and |
|
|
|
|
any excess distribution that we make to you (generally, any distributions to you
during a single taxable year that are greater than 125% of the average annual
distributions received by you in respect of the shares or ADSs during the three
preceding taxable years or, if shorter, your holding period for the shares or ADSs). |
Under these rules:
|
|
|
the gain or excess distribution will be allocated ratably over your holding period
for the shares or ADSs, |
85
|
|
|
the amount allocated to the taxable year in which you realized the gain or excess
distribution will be taxed as ordinary income, |
|
|
|
|
the amount allocated to each prior year, with certain exceptions, will be taxed at
the highest tax rate in effect for that year, and |
|
|
|
|
the interest charge generally applicable to underpayments of tax will be imposed in
respect of the tax attributable to each such year. |
Special rules apply for calculating the amount of the foreign tax credit with respect to
excess distributions by a PFIC.
If your shares or ADSs are treated as stock of a PFIC, you may make a mark-to-market election.
If you make this election, you will not be subject to the PFIC rules described above. Instead, in
general, you
will include as ordinary income each year the excess, if any, of the fair market value of your
shares or ADSs at the end of the taxable year over your adjusted basis in your shares or ADSs.
These amounts of ordinary income will not be eligible for the favorable tax rates applicable to
qualified dividend income or long-term capital gains. You will also be allowed to take an ordinary
loss in respect of the excess, if any, of the adjusted basis of your shares or ADSs over their fair
market value at the end of the taxable year or over their final sale or disposition prices, but
only to the extent of the net amount of previously included income as a result of the
mark-to-market election. Your basis in the shares or ADSs will be adjusted to reflect any such
income or loss amounts.
In addition, notwithstanding any election you make with regard to the shares or ADSs,
dividends that you receive from us will not constitute qualified dividend income to you if we are a
PFIC either in the taxable year of the distribution or the preceding taxable year. Moreover, your
shares or ADSs will be treated as stock in a PFIC if we were a PFIC at any time during your holding
period in your shares or ADSs, even if we are not currently a PFIC. For purposes of this rule, if
you make a mark-to-market election with respect to your shares or ADSs, you will be treated as
having a new holding period in your shares or ADSs beginning on the first day of the first taxable
year beginning after the last taxable year for which the mark-to-market election applies. Dividends
that you receive that do not constitute qualified dividend income are not eligible for taxation at
the 15% maximum rate applicable to qualified dividend income. Instead, you must include the gross
amount of any such dividend paid by us out of our accumulated earnings and profits (as determined
for United States federal income tax purposes) in your gross income, and it will be subject to tax
at rates applicable to ordinary income.
If you own shares or ADSs during any year that we are a PFIC with respect to you, you must
file Internal Revenue Service Form 8621.
F. Dividends and Paying Agents.
Not required.
G. Statement by Experts.
Not applicable.
H. Documents on Display.
We file periodic reports and other information with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The
Securities and Exchange Commission maintains a web site at www.sec.gov that contains reports and
other information regarding us and other registrants that file electronically with the Securities
and Exchange
86
Commission. You may read and copy any document we file with the Securities and Exchange
Commission at the Securities and Exchange Commissions public reference room at 100 F Street, NE,
Washington, D.C. 20549. Please call the Securities and Exchange Commission at 1-800-SEC-0330 for
further information on the operation of its public reference room. In addition, you may also
inspect reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and other information at our
Tokyo headquarters, located at Jinbocho Mitsui Bldg., 1-105 Kanda Jinbo-cho, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo
101-0051, Japan. Some of this information may also be found on our website at
http://www.iij.ad.jp/. This information is not incorporated by reference into this annual report on
Form 20-F.
I. Subsidiary Information.
Not applicable.
Item 11. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk.
We are exposed to market risks from changes in interest rates, equity prices and foreign
currency exchange rates.
Interest Rate Risk
The table below provides information about financial instruments held by us that are sensitive
to changes in interest rates, including debt obligations and interest rate swaps. For debt
obligations, the table presents whether the interest component is fixed or variable, the amount and
timing of cash flows, the expected weighted-average interest rates over the next five years, as
well as the fair value of each debt instrument. For interest rate swaps, the table presents the
notional amounts and weighted average interest rates by expected maturity dates.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expected maturity date |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
or |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain |
March 31, 2007 |
|
2008 |
|
2009 |
|
2010 |
|
2011 |
|
2012 |
|
Total |
|
(loss) |
|
|
(millions of yen) |
Long-term debt obligations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed rate long-term borrowings and
installment payable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average interest rate |
|
|
|
% |
|
|
|
% |
|
|
|
% |
|
|
|
% |
|
|
|
% |
|
|
|
% |
|
|
|
|
Variable rate long-term borrowings |
|
|
290 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
290 |
|
|
|
290 |
|
Average interest rate |
|
|
1.997 |
% |
|
|
|
% |
|
|
|
% |
|
|
|
% |
|
|
|
% |
|
|
1.997 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Interest rate swap contracts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notional amount variable to fixed: |
|
|
250 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
250 |
|
|
|
|
|
Average pay rate |
|
|
1.670 |
% |
|
|
|
% |
|
|
|
% |
|
|
|
% |
|
|
|
% |
|
|
1.670 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Average receive rate |
|
|
1.706 |
% |
|
|
|
% |
|
|
|
% |
|
|
|
% |
|
|
|
% |
|
|
1.706 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expected maturity date |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
value or |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain |
March 31, 2006 |
|
2007 |
|
2008 |
|
2009 |
|
2010 |
|
2011 |
|
Total |
|
(loss) |
|
|
(millions of yen) |
Long-term debt obligations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed rate long-term borrowings and
installment payable |
|
|
756 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
756 |
|
|
|
756 |
|
87
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expected maturity date |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
value or |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain |
March 31, 2006 |
|
2007 |
|
2008 |
|
2009 |
|
2010 |
|
2011 |
|
Total |
|
(loss) |
|
|
(millions of yen) |
Average interest rate |
|
|
1.883 |
% |
|
|
|
% |
|
|
|
% |
|
|
|
% |
|
|
|
% |
|
|
1.883 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Variable rate long-term borrowings |
|
|
1,234 |
|
|
|
290 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,524 |
|
|
|
1,524 |
|
Average interest rate |
|
|
1.413 |
% |
|
|
1.440 |
% |
|
|
|
% |
|
|
|
% |
|
|
|
% |
|
|
1.418 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Interest rate swap contracts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notional amount variable to fixed: |
|
|
900 |
|
|
|
250 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,150 |
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
Average pay rate |
|
|
1.812 |
% |
|
|
1.670 |
% |
|
|
|
% |
|
|
|
% |
|
|
|
% |
|
|
1.781 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Average receive rate |
|
|
1.166 |
% |
|
|
1.150 |
% |
|
|
|
% |
|
|
|
% |
|
|
|
% |
|
|
1.162 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Our policy on managing interest rate risk is to hedge our exposure to variability in
future cash flow of floating rate interest payment on long-term bank borrowings. In order to reduce
cash flow risk exposures on floating rate borrowings, we utilize interest rate swaps to convert
floating rate borrowings into fixed rate borrowings. We do not hold derivative instruments for
speculative purposes. Also, we do not hold or issue financial instruments for trading purposes. The
changes in fair value of interest rate swaps designated as hedging instruments are reported in
accumulated other comprehensive income and the fair value was ¥45 thousand as of March 31, 2007.
See note 15 to our consolidated financial statements included in this annual report on Form 20-F.
Equity Price Risk
The fair value of certain of our investments, primarily in marketable securities, exposes us
to equity price risks. In general, we have invested in highly liquid and low-risk instruments,
which are not held for trading purposes. We are exposed to changes in the market prices of the
securities. As of March 31, 2006 and 2007, the fair value of such investments was ¥6,775 million
and ¥1,298 million, respectively. The potential loss in fair value resulting from a 10% adverse
change in equity prices would be approximately ¥678 million and ¥130 million as of March 31, 2006
and 2007, respectively. See Note 2 to our consolidated financial statements, included in this
annual report on Form 20-F.
Foreign Currency Exchange Rate Risk
The only significant assets held by us which are exposed to foreign currency exchange risk are
U.S. dollar denominated bank deposits. The carrying value, which also represents fair value,
amounted to $3,764 thousand (¥442 million) and $3,172 thousand (¥373 million) at March 31, 2006 and
2007, respectively. The potential loss in fair value for such financial instruments from a 10%
adverse change in quoted foreign currency exchange rates would have been approximately ¥44 million
and ¥37 million at March 31, 2006 and 2007, respectively.
Item 12.
Description of Securities Other than Equity Securities.
Not applicable.
PART II
Item 13.
Defaults, Dividend Arrearages and Delinquencies.
None.
88
Item 14.
Material Modifications to the Rights of Security Holders and Use of Proceeds.
None.
Item 15T.
Controls and Procedures.
Disclosure Controls and Procedures
As of the end of the fiscal year ended March 31, 2007, our management, with the participation
of Koichi Suzuki, our president, chief executive officer and representative director, and Akihisa
Watai, our director, chief financial officer and chief accounting officer, performed an evaluation
of our disclosure controls and procedures.
Under Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, disclosure
controls and procedures means our controls and other procedures that are designed to ensure that
information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time
periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commissions rules and forms. Disclosure controls
and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that
information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our
chief executive officer and chief financial officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions
regarding required disclosure.
Based on that evaluation, our chief executive officer and chief financial officer concluded
that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of March 31, 2007.
Managements Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over
financial reporting for our company.
Under Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, internal control
over financial reporting means a process designed by, or under the supervision of, our chief
executive officer and chief financial officer and effected by our Board of Directors, management
and other personnel, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial
reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America and includes those
policies and procedures that:
|
|
|
pertain to the maintenance of records that in reasonable detail accurately
and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of our assets, |
|
|
|
|
provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to
permit preparation of our financial statements in accordance with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States of America, and that our receipts
and expenditures are being made only in accordance with authorizations of our
management and directors, and |
|
|
|
|
provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of
unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of our assets that could have a material
effect on our financial statements. |
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent
or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluations of effectiveness to future periods
are subject to the
89
risk controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that
the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
Our management evaluated the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting
using the criteria set forth in Internal Control Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of
Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Based on this evaluation, management
concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of March 31, 2007.
This annual report does not include an attestation report of our companys registered public
accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting. Managements report was not
subject to attestation by our companys registered public accounting firm pursuant to temporary
rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission that permit us to provide only managements report
in this annual report.
Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
With the participation of our chief executive officer and chief financial officer, our
management also evaluated any change in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred
during the fiscal year ended March 31, 2007. Based on that evaluation, our chief executive officer
and chief financial officer concluded that no changes were made in our internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the fiscal year ended March 31, 2007 that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial
reporting.
Item 16A.
Audit Committee Financial Expert
At our shareholders meeting on June 24, 2004, two company auditors were newly nominated and
our Board of Company Auditors has determined that one of the nominated company auditors serving on
the Board of Company Auditors, Masaaki Koizumi, is an audit committee financial expert as defined
in Item 16A. of Form 20-F. Mr. Koizumi is independent from us.
An audit committee financial expert is defined in Item 16A. of Form 20-F to mean a person
who has the following attributes:
(1) An understanding of generally accepted accounting principles and financial statements,
(2) The ability to assess the general application of such principles in connection with the
accounting for estimates, accruals and reserves,
(3) Experience preparing, auditing, analyzing or evaluating financial statements that present
a breadth and level of complexity of accounting issues that are generally comparable to the breadth
and complexity of issues that can reasonably be expected to be raised by the registrants financial
statements, or experience actively supervising one or more persons engaged in such activities,
(4) An understanding of internal controls over financial reporting,
(5) An understanding of audit committee functions.
Such person shall have acquired the attributes described above through:
(1) Education and experience as a principal financial officer, principal accounting officer,
controller, public accountant or auditor or experience in one or more positions that involve the
performance of similar functions,
90
(2) Experience actively supervising a principal financial officer, principal accounting
officer, controller, public accountant, auditor or person performing similar functions,
(3) Experience overseeing or assessing the performance of companies or public accountants with
respect to the preparation, auditing or evaluation of financial statements, or
(4) Other relevant experience.
A person who is determined to be an audit committee financial expert will not be deemed an
expert for any purpose, including without limitation for purposes of section 11 of the Securities
Act of 1933 (15 U.S.C. 77k), as a result of being designated or identified as an audit committee
financial expert pursuant to this Item 16A. The designation or identification of a person as an
audit committee financial expert pursuant to this Item 16A does not impose on such person any
duties, obligations or liability that are greater than the duties, obligations and liability
imposed on such person as a member of the audit committee and Board of Directors in the absence of
such designation or identification. The designation or identification of a person as an audit
committee financial expert pursuant to this Item 16A does not affect the duties, obligations or
liability of any other member of the audit committee or Board of Directors.
Item 16B.
Code of Ethics.
At our Board of Directors Meeting on April 28, 2004, we adopted a Code of Ethics, the Internet
Initiative Japan Code of Conduct, applicable to all employees and officers, including our chief
executive officer, chief financial officer and chief accounting officer. The Code of Conduct is
attached as Exhibit 11.1 to this annual report on Form 20-F.
On April 27, 2006, we amended the Code of Ethics to add a provision to the effect that
officers and employees shall respect various stake holders.
Item 16C.
Principal Accountant Fees and Services.
Independent Auditor Fees and Services
The Board of Directors engaged Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu to perform an annual audit of our
financial statements for each of the fiscal years ended March 31, 2006 and 2007. The following
table sets forth the aggregate fees billed for services rendered by Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu for
each of the last two fiscal years.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal year ended March 31, |
|
|
2006 |
|
2007 |
|
|
(millions of yen) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Audit fees (1) |
|
|
80 |
|
|
|
85 |
|
Audit-related fees (2) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
Tax fees (3) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
15 |
|
All other fees (4) |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total fees |
|
|
84 |
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
These are the aggregate fees billed for the fiscal year for professional services rendered by
Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu for the audit of our annual financial statements and services that
are normally provided in connection with statutory and regulatory filings or engagements for
those fiscal years. |
|
(2) |
|
These are the aggregate fees billed for the fiscal year for assurance and related services by
Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review
of our financial statements other than |
91
|
|
|
|
|
those reported under Audit Fees above. These services
include internal control reviews and consultation concerning financial accounting and
reporting standards. |
|
(3) |
|
These are the aggregate fees billed for the fiscal year for professional services rendered by
Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu for tax compliance, tax advice and tax planning. |
|
(4) |
|
These are the aggregate fees for the fiscal year for all other products and services provided
by Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu including consultation services related to the Privacy Mark System
being instituted by The Japan Information Processing Development Center. |
Board of Company Auditors Pre-Approval Policies and Procedures
The Board of Company Auditors has adopted policies and procedures for pre-approving all audit
and permissible non-audit work performed by independent registered public accounting firm in
accordance with Rule 2-01(c)(7)(i)(B) under Regulation S-X. Under those policies and procedures,
the Board of Company Auditors must pre-approve individual audit and non-audit services to be
provided to us by our independent registered public accounting firm and its affiliates. Those
policies and procedures also describe prohibited non-audit services that may never be provided by
independent registered public accounting firm.
All of the services provided by our independent registered public accounting firm from May 6,
2003, when our pre-approval policies went into effect, through the end of the fiscal year ended
March 31, 2007 were pre-approved by the Board of Company Auditors pursuant to the pre-approval
policies described above, and none of such services were approved pursuant to the procedures
described in Rule 2-01(c)(7)(i)(C) of Regulation S-X, which waives the general requirement for
pre-approval in certain circumstances.
Item 16D.
Exemptions from the Listing Standards for Audit Committees.
With respect to the requirements of Rule 10A-3 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
relating to listed company audit committees, which apply to us through Rules 4350(d)(3) and
4350(d)(2)(A)(ii) of the NASD Manual, we rely on an exemption provided by paragraph (c)(3) of that
Rule available to foreign private issuers with Boards of Company Auditors meeting certain
requirements. For a Nasdaq-listed Japanese company with a Board of Company auditors, the
requirements for relying on paragraph (c)(3) of Rule 10A-3 are as follows:
|
|
|
The Board of Company Auditors must be established, and its members must be
selected, pursuant to Japanese law expressly requiring such a board for Japanese
companies that elect to have a corporate governance system with company auditors, |
|
|
|
|
Japanese law must and does require the Board of Company Auditors to be separate
from the Board of Directors, |
|
|
|
|
None of the members of the Board of Company Auditors may be elected by management,
and none of the listed companys executive officers may be a member of the Board of
Company Auditors, |
|
|
|
|
Japanese law must and does set forth standards for the independence of the members
of the Board of Company Auditors from the listed company or its management, and |
|
|
|
|
The Board of Company Auditors, in accordance with Japanese law or the registrants
governing documents, must be responsible, to the extent permitted by Japanese law, for
the appointment, retention and oversight of the work of any registered public
accounting firm engaged (including, to the extent permitted by Japanese law, the
resolution of disagreements between management and the auditor regarding financial
reporting) for the purpose of preparing or issuing an audit report or performing other
audit, review or attest services for the listed |
92
|
|
|
company, including its principal
accountant which audits its consolidated financial statements included in its annual
reports on Form 20-F. |
To the extent permitted by Japanese law:
|
|
|
The Board of Company Auditors must establish procedures for (i) the receipt,
retention and treatment of complaints received by us regarding accounting, internal
accounting controls, or auditing matters, and (ii) the confidential, anonymous
submission by our employees of concerns regarding questionable accounting or auditing
matters, |
|
|
|
|
The Board of Company Auditors must have the authority to engage independent counsel
and other advisers, as it determines necessary to carry out its duties, and |
|
|
|
|
The listed company must provide for appropriate funding, as determined by its Board
of Company Auditors, for payment of (i) compensation to any registered public
accounting firm engaged for the purpose of preparing or issuing an audit report or
performing other audit, review or attest services for us, (ii) compensation to any
advisers employed by the Board of Company Auditors, and (iii) ordinary administrative
expenses of the Board of Company Auditors that are necessary or appropriate in
carrying out its duties. |
In our assessment, our Board of Company Auditors, which meets the requirements for reliance on
the exemption in paragraph (c)(3) of Rule 10A-3 described above, is not materially less effective
than an audit committee meeting all the requirements of paragraph (b) of Rule 10A-3 (without
relying on any exemption provided by that Rule) at acting independently of management and
performing the functions of an audit committee as contemplated therein.
Item 16E.
Purchases of Equity Securities by the Issuer and Affiliated Purchasers.
We did not purchase any of our shares for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2007.
PART III
Item 17.
Financial Statements.
Not applicable.
Item 18.
Financial Statements.
See Financial Statements for Internet Initiative Japan Inc. and Subsidiaries beginning on page
F-1.
Item 19.
Exhibits.
|
|
|
1.1
|
|
Articles of Incorporation, as amended (English translation) |
1.2
|
|
Share Handling Regulations, as amended (English translation)* |
1.3
|
|
Regulations of the Board of Directors, as amended (English translation)** |
1.4
|
|
Regulations of the Board of Company Auditors, as amended (English translation)*** |
2.1
|
|
Specimen Common Stock Certificate**** |
2.2
|
|
Bylaws of the IIJ Employee Shareholders Association (with English translation)**** |
2.3
|
|
Form of Deposit Agreement among IIJ, The Bank of New York as depositary and all owners and
holders from time to time of American Depositary Receipts, including the form of American
Depositary Receipt***** |
4.1
|
|
Basic Agreement to Delegate Services, dated April 1, 1997, between Internet Initiative
Japan Inc. |
93
|
|
|
|
|
and IIJ Technology Inc. (with English translation)**** |
4.2
|
|
Shareholders Agreement Relating to the Establishment of INTERNET MULTIFEED CO., dated
August 20, 1997, between Nippon Telegraph and Telephone Corporation and the Registrant
(with English translation)**** |
4.3
|
|
Basic Agreement to Delegate Services, dated April 1, 1998, between Internet Initiative
Japan Inc. and Net Care, Inc. (with English translation)**** |
4.4
|
|
Lease Agreement, dated March 14, 2003, between Internet Initiative Japan Inc. and Mitsui
Fudosan Co., Ltd. (English translation)** |
4.5
|
|
Sublease Agreements, dated March 15, 2003, between Internet Initiative Japan Inc., IIJ
Technology Inc. and Net Care, Inc. (English translations)** |
4.6
|
|
Joint Venture Agreement, dated January 19, 2006, between Internet Initiative Japan Inc.
and Konami Corporation (English translation)* |
4.20
|
|
Subscription Agreement, dated September 16, 2003, between Internet Initiative Japan Inc.
and Nippon Telegraph and Telephone Corporation (English translation)** |
4.21
|
|
Service Agreement, dated March 25, 2004, between Internet Initiative Japan Inc. and IIJ
America Inc.****** |
|
|
|
4.24
|
|
Agreement on Limited Liability, dated June 28, 2006 and June 26, 2007, between Internet
Initiative Japan Inc. and outside directors and outside company auditors******* |
|
|
|
8.1
|
|
List of Significant Subsidiaries (See Our Group Companies in Item 4.B. of this Form 20-F) |
11.1
|
|
Internet Initiative Japan Code of Conduct* |
12.1
|
|
Certification of the principal executive officer required by 17 C.F.R. 240. 13a-14(a) |
12.2
|
|
Certification of the principal financial officer required by 17 C.F.R. 240. 13a-14(a) |
13.1
|
|
Certification of the chief executive officer required by 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 |
13.2
|
|
Certification of the chief financial officer required by 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 |
14.1
|
|
Selected unaudited financial statement data as of and for the year ended March 31, 2003 of
Crosswave Communications Inc.** |
|
|
|
(*) |
|
Incorporated by reference to the corresponding exhibit to our annual report on Form 20-F
(File No. 0-30204) filed on July 11, 2006. |
|
(**) |
|
Incorporated by reference to the corresponding exhibit to our annual report on Form 20-F
(File No. 0-30204) filed on September 30, 2003. |
|
(***) |
|
Incorporated by reference to the corresponding exhibit to our annual report on Form 20-F
(File No. 0-30204) filed on August 3, 2005. |
|
(****) |
|
Incorporated by reference to the corresponding exhibit to our Form F-1 Registration
Statement (File No. 333-10584) declared effective on August 3, 1999. |
|
(*****) |
|
Incorporated by reference to the Registration Statement on Form F-6 (File No. 333-110862)
filed on December 2, 2003. |
|
(******) |
|
Incorporated by reference to the corresponding exhibit to our annual report on Form 20-F
(File No. 0-30204) filed on July 23, 2004. |
|
(*******) |
|
We and each of Mr. Yasurou Tanahashi and Mr. Takashi Hiroi as our outside directors and
each of Mr. Masaki Okada and Mr. Masaaki Koizumi as our outside company auditors entered into
an Agreement on Limited Liability, dated June 28, 2006. We entered into an Agreement on
Limited Liability, dated June 26, 2007, with each of Mr. Yoshifumi Nishikawa and Mr. Junnosuke
Furukawa as our outside directors. |
Except for Exhibit 2.3, we have not included as exhibits certain instruments with respect
to our long-term debt. Except for Exhibit 2.3, the amount of debt authorized under each long-term
debt instrument does not exceed 10% or our total assets. We agree to furnish a copy of any
long-term debt instrument to the Commission upon request.
94
SIGNATURE
The registrant hereby certifies that it meets all of the requirements for filing on Form 20-F
and that it has duly caused and authorized the undersigned to sign this annual report on its
behalf.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Internet Initiative Japan Inc.
|
|
|
By: |
/s/ Koichi Suzuki
|
|
|
|
Name: |
Koichi Suzuki |
|
|
|
Title: |
President, Chief Executive Officer
and Representative Director |
|
|
Date: July 6, 2007
95
Internet Initiative Japan Inc. and Subsidiaries
Index to Consolidated Financial Statements
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page |
|
|
|
F-2 |
|
|
|
|
|
F-3 |
|
|
|
|
|
F-5 |
|
|
|
|
|
F-7 |
|
|
|
|
|
F-8 |
|
|
|
|
|
F-11 |
|
F-1
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of
Internet Initiative Japan Inc.:
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Internet Initiative Japan Inc. and
subsidiaries (the Company) as of March 31, 2006 and 2007 and the related consolidated statements
of income, shareholders equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended
March 31, 2007 (all expressed in Japanese yen). These financial statements are the responsibility
of the Companys management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial
statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight
Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. The
Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control
over financial reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal control over financial
reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but
not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Companys internal control
over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes
examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial
statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management,
as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits
provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, such consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects,
the financial position of Internet Initiative Japan Inc. and subsidiaries as of March 31, 2006 and
2007 and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the
period ended March 31, 2007, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States of America.
Our audits also comprehended the translation of Japanese yen amounts into U.S. dollar amounts and,
in our opinion, such translation has been made in conformity with the basis stated in Note 1. Such
U.S. dollar amounts are presented solely for the convenience of readers outside Japan.
/s/ DELOITTE TOUCHE TOHMATSU
Tokyo, Japan
June 26, 2007
F-2
Internet Initiative Japan Inc. and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Balance Sheets
March 31, 2006 and 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thousands of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Dollars |
|
|
|
Thousands of Yen |
|
|
(Note 1) |
|
ASSETS |
|
2006 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CURRENT ASSETS: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash (Note 15) |
|
¥ |
13,727,021 |
|
|
¥ |
13,554,544 |
|
|
$ |
115,299 |
|
Short-term investment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,093 |
|
|
|
103 |
|
Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of
¥23,411 thousand and ¥32,489 thousand ($276 thousand) at March
31, 2006 and 2007, respectively (Notes 3, 4 and 17) |
|
|
11,962,304 |
|
|
|
9,675,725 |
|
|
|
82,305 |
|
Inventories |
|
|
851,857 |
|
|
|
1,111,086 |
|
|
|
9,451 |
|
Prepaid expenses |
|
|
1,031,325 |
|
|
|
1,053,270 |
|
|
|
8,959 |
|
Other current assets, net of allowance for doubtful accounts
of ¥33,250 thousand and ¥4,570 thousand ($39 thousand)
at March 31, 2006 and 2007, respectively (Notes 3, 7 and 9) |
|
|
214,121 |
|
|
|
930,571 |
|
|
|
7,916 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
27,786,628 |
|
|
|
26,337,289 |
|
|
|
224,033 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INVESTMENTS IN AND ADVANCES TO
EQUITY METHOD INVESTEES, net of loan loss valuation
allowance of ¥16,701 thousand ($142 thousand) at March
31, 2006 and 2007 (Notes 3 and 4) |
|
|
1,162,971 |
|
|
|
858,490 |
|
|
|
7,302 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OTHER INVESTMENTS (Notes 2, 8, 14 and 15) |
|
|
8,020,705 |
|
|
|
2,841,741 |
|
|
|
24,173 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENTNet (Notes 5 and 7) |
|
|
10,299,496 |
|
|
|
9,832,396 |
|
|
|
83,637 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INTANGIBLE ASSETSNet (Note 6) |
|
|
632,594 |
|
|
|
2,876,894 |
|
|
|
24,472 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GUARANTEE DEPOSITS (Notes 7, 8 and 15) |
|
|
1,549,653 |
|
|
|
1,686,141 |
|
|
|
14,343 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OTHER ASSETS, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of
¥40,980 thousand and ¥69,050 thousand ($587 thousand) at March
31, 2006 and 2007, respectively (Notes 3, 7, 9, 10 and 15) |
|
|
1,252,942 |
|
|
|
3,260,053 |
|
|
|
27,731 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL |
|
¥ |
50,704,989 |
|
|
¥ |
47,693,004 |
|
|
$ |
405,691 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-3
Internet Initiative Japan Inc. and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Balance Sheets
March 31, 2006 and 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thousands of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Dollars |
|
|
|
Thousands of Yen |
|
|
(Note 1) |
|
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY |
|
2006 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CURRENT LIABILITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term borrowings (Note 8) |
|
¥ |
4,555,000 |
|
|
¥ |
6,050,000 |
|
|
$ |
51,463 |
|
Long-term borrowingscurrent portion
(Notes 8 and 15) |
|
|
1,989,963 |
|
|
|
290,000 |
|
|
|
2,467 |
|
Payable under securities loan agreement (Note 8) |
|
|
999,600 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital lease obligationscurrent portion (Note 7) |
|
|
3,003,914 |
|
|
|
2,953,173 |
|
|
|
25,121 |
|
Accounts payable (Notes 4 and 17) |
|
|
10,107,942 |
|
|
|
8,464,835 |
|
|
|
72,004 |
|
Accrued expenses |
|
|
540,027 |
|
|
|
897,355 |
|
|
|
7,633 |
|
Accrued retirement and pension costs-current (Note 10) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,428 |
|
|
|
72 |
|
Other current liabilities |
|
|
1,702,208 |
|
|
|
2,469,058 |
|
|
|
21,002 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
22,898,654 |
|
|
|
21,132,849 |
|
|
|
179,762 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LONG-TERM BORROWINGS (Notes 8 and 15) |
|
|
290,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CAPITAL LEASE OBLIGATIONSNoncurrent (Note 7) |
|
|
4,980,659 |
|
|
|
4,318,309 |
|
|
|
36,733 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ACCRUED RETIREMENT AND PENSION COSTS
Noncurrent (Note 10) |
|
|
223,332 |
|
|
|
750,042 |
|
|
|
6,380 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OTHER NONCURRENT LIABILITIES (Notes 9 and 10) |
|
|
827,086 |
|
|
|
564,618 |
|
|
|
4,803 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
29,219,731 |
|
|
|
26,765,818 |
|
|
|
227,678 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MINORITY INTEREST |
|
|
1,263,320 |
|
|
|
815,182 |
|
|
|
6,934 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES (Note 14) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY (Notes 10, 11 and 12): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stockauthorized, 377,600 shares;
issued and outstanding, 204,300 shares at March 31, 2006
and 2007 |
|
|
16,833,847 |
|
|
|
16,833,847 |
|
|
|
143,194 |
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
26,599,217 |
|
|
|
26,599,217 |
|
|
|
226,261 |
|
Accumulated deficit |
|
|
(29,680,482 |
) |
|
|
(24,270,769 |
) |
|
|
(206,454 |
) |
Accumulated other comprehensive income |
|
|
6,553,594 |
|
|
|
949,709 |
|
|
|
8,078 |
|
Treasury stock777 shares held by an equity
method investee at March 31, 2006 |
|
|
(84,238 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shareholders equity |
|
|
20,221,938 |
|
|
|
20,112,004 |
|
|
|
171,079 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL |
|
¥ |
50,704,989 |
|
|
¥ |
47,693,004 |
|
|
$ |
405,691 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-4
Internet Initiative Japan Inc. and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Income
Three Years in the Period Ended March 31, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thousands of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Dollars |
|
|
|
Thousands of Yen |
|
|
(Note 1) |
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
REVENUES (Notes 4 and 17): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Connectivity and value-added services: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dedicated access |
|
¥ |
11,372,701 |
|
|
¥ |
10,625,268 |
|
|
¥ |
10,791,703 |
|
|
$ |
91,797 |
|
Dial-up access |
|
|
2,936,973 |
|
|
|
2,673,808 |
|
|
|
2,416,307 |
|
|
|
20,554 |
|
Value-added services |
|
|
5,004,730 |
|
|
|
6,249,891 |
|
|
|
7,415,533 |
|
|
|
63,079 |
|
Other |
|
|
3,169,413 |
|
|
|
3,673,872 |
|
|
|
3,729,633 |
|
|
|
31,725 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
22,483,817 |
|
|
|
23,222,839 |
|
|
|
24,353,176 |
|
|
|
207,155 |
|
Systems integration |
|
|
15,853,824 |
|
|
|
23,504,537 |
|
|
|
30,527,081 |
|
|
|
259,672 |
|
Equipment sales |
|
|
3,364,926 |
|
|
|
3,085,208 |
|
|
|
2,174,324 |
|
|
|
18,496 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
|
41,702,567 |
|
|
|
49,812,584 |
|
|
|
57,054,581 |
|
|
|
485,323 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
COST AND EXPENSES (Notes 4 and 17): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of connectivity and value-added
services |
|
|
19,483,890 |
|
|
|
20,077,990 |
|
|
|
20,545,358 |
|
|
|
174,765 |
|
Cost of systems integration |
|
|
12,200,137 |
|
|
|
18,120,418 |
|
|
|
23,529,045 |
|
|
|
200,145 |
|
Cost of equipment sales |
|
|
3,111,369 |
|
|
|
2,818,036 |
|
|
|
1,893,216 |
|
|
|
16,104 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cost |
|
|
34,795,396 |
|
|
|
41,016,444 |
|
|
|
45,967,619 |
|
|
|
391,014 |
|
Sales and marketing (Note 16) |
|
|
2,794,561 |
|
|
|
3,079,526 |
|
|
|
3,438,725 |
|
|
|
29,251 |
|
General and administrative (Note 6) |
|
|
2,665,980 |
|
|
|
3,147,315 |
|
|
|
3,970,692 |
|
|
|
33,776 |
|
Research and development |
|
|
198,979 |
|
|
|
158,155 |
|
|
|
177,273 |
|
|
|
1,508 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cost and expenses |
|
|
40,454,916 |
|
|
|
47,401,440 |
|
|
|
53,554,309 |
|
|
|
455,549 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OPERATING INCOME |
|
|
1,247,651 |
|
|
|
2,411,144 |
|
|
|
3,500,272 |
|
|
|
29,774 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OTHER INCOME (EXPENSES): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income |
|
|
12,877 |
|
|
|
13,099 |
|
|
|
23,037 |
|
|
|
196 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
(685,857 |
) |
|
|
(437,364 |
) |
|
|
(397,439 |
) |
|
|
(3,381 |
) |
Foreign exchange gains (losses) |
|
|
5,958 |
|
|
|
3,470 |
|
|
|
(297 |
) |
|
|
(3 |
) |
Net gain on other investments (Note 2) |
|
|
2,439,330 |
|
|
|
3,197,690 |
|
|
|
1,866,510 |
|
|
|
15,877 |
|
Gain arising
from issuance of common stock by equity method investee |
|
|
25,933 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Othernet |
|
|
102,616 |
|
|
|
190,520 |
|
|
|
56,605 |
|
|
|
482 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other incomenet |
|
|
1,900,857 |
|
|
|
2,967,415 |
|
|
|
1,548,416 |
|
|
|
13,171 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INCOME FROM OPERATIONS BEFORE INCOME TAX
EXPENSE (BENEFIT), MINORITY INTERESTS
AND EQUITY IN NET LOSS OF EQUITY METHOD
INVESTEES |
|
|
3,148,508 |
|
|
|
5,378,559 |
|
|
|
5,048,688 |
|
|
|
42,945 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INCOME TAX EXPENSE (BENEFIT) (Note 9) |
|
|
99,870 |
|
|
|
257,360 |
|
|
|
(803,943 |
) |
|
|
(6,839 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MINORITY INTERESTS IN EARNINGS
OF SUBSIDIARIES |
|
|
(109,161 |
) |
|
|
(353,883 |
) |
|
|
(232,719 |
) |
|
|
(1,979 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FORWARD |
|
¥ |
2,939,477 |
|
|
¥ |
4,767,316 |
|
|
¥ |
5,619,912 |
|
|
$ |
47,805 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Continued)
F-5
Internet Initiative Japan Inc. and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Income
Three Years in the Period Ended March 31, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thousands of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Dollars |
|
|
|
Thousands of Yen |
|
|
(Note 1) |
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FORWARD |
|
¥ |
2,939,477 |
|
|
¥ |
4,767,316 |
|
|
¥ |
5,619,912 |
|
|
$ |
47,805 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EQUITY IN NET LOSS OF EQUITY
METHOD INVESTEES (Note 4): |
|
|
(33,208 |
) |
|
|
(13,746 |
) |
|
|
(210,199 |
) |
|
|
(1,788 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET INCOME |
|
¥ |
2,906,269 |
|
|
¥ |
4,753,570 |
|
|
¥ |
5,409,713 |
|
|
$ |
46,017 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET INCOME PER SHARE (Note 13): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BASIC WEIGHTED-AVERAGE NUMBER
OF COMMON SHARES
OUTSTANDING |
|
|
191,559 |
|
|
|
195,613 |
|
|
|
203,992 |
|
|
|
|
|
DILUTED WEIGHTED-AVERAGE NUMBER
OF COMMON SHARES
OUTSTANDING |
|
|
191,559 |
|
|
|
195,955 |
|
|
|
204,244 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yen |
|
|
U.S. Dollars |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BASIC NET INCOME
PER COMMON SHARE |
|
¥ |
15,172 |
|
|
¥ |
24,301 |
|
|
¥ |
26,519 |
|
|
$ |
226 |
|
DILUTED NET INCOME
PER COMMON SHARE |
|
¥ |
15,172 |
|
|
¥ |
24,258 |
|
|
¥ |
26,487 |
|
|
$ |
225 |
|
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
(Concluded)
F-6
Internet Initiative Japan Inc. and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Shareholders Equity
Three Years in the Period Ended March 31, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thousands of Yen |
|
|
|
Shares of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Including |
|
|
Common |
|
|
Paid-in |
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
Income |
|
|
Treasury |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Treasury Stock) |
|
|
Stock |
|
|
Capital |
|
|
Deficit |
|
|
(Notes 10 and 12) |
|
|
Stock |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BALANCE, APRIL 1, 2004 |
|
|
191,800 |
|
|
¥ |
13,765,372 |
|
|
¥ |
23,637,628 |
|
|
¥ |
(37,340,321 |
) |
|
¥ |
6,195,449 |
|
|
¥ |
(44,000 |
) |
|
¥ |
6,214,128 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,906,269 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,906,269 |
|
Other comprehensive income, net of tax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,494,676 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,494,676 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,400,945 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BALANCE, MARCH 31, 2005 |
|
|
191,800 |
|
|
|
13,765,372 |
|
|
|
23,637,628 |
|
|
|
(34,434,052 |
) |
|
|
8,690,125 |
|
|
|
(44,000 |
) |
|
|
11,615,073 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,753,570 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,753,570 |
|
Other comprehensive loss, net of tax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,136,531 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,136,531 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,617,039 |
|
Issuance of common stock, net of
issuance cost |
|
|
12,500 |
|
|
|
3,068,475 |
|
|
|
2,961,589 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,030,064 |
|
Purchase of common stock by an equity
method investee |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(40,238 |
) |
|
|
(40,238 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BALANCE, MARCH 31, 2006 |
|
|
204,300 |
|
|
|
16,883,847 |
|
|
|
26,599,217 |
|
|
|
(29,680,482 |
) |
|
|
6,553,594 |
|
|
|
(84,238 |
) |
|
|
20,221,938 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,409,713 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,409,713 |
|
Other comprehensive loss, net of tax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,492,154 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,492,154 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(82,441 |
) |
Adjustment to initially apply
SFAS158, net of tax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(111,731 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(111,731 |
) |
Dissolution of reciprocal interests
due to sale of investment in an
equity method investee |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
84,238 |
|
|
|
84,238 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BALANCE, MARCH 31, 2007 |
|
|
204,300 |
|
|
¥ |
16,833,847 |
|
|
¥ |
26,599,217 |
|
|
¥ |
(24,270,769 |
) |
|
¥ |
949,709 |
|
|
¥ |
|
|
|
¥ |
20,112,004 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thousands of U.S. Dollars (Note 1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common |
|
|
Paid-in |
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
Income |
|
|
Treasury |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock |
|
|
Capital |
|
|
Deficit |
|
|
(Notes 10 and 12) |
|
|
Stock |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BALANCE, MARCH 31, 2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
143,194 |
|
|
$ |
226,261 |
|
|
$ |
(252,471 |
) |
|
$ |
55,747 |
|
|
$ |
(717 |
) |
|
$ |
172,014 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
46,017 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
46,017 |
|
Other comprehensive loss, net of tax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(46,718 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(46,718 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(701 |
) |
Adjustment to initially apply SFAS158, net of tax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(951 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(951 |
) |
Dissolution of reciprocal interests due to sale
of investment in an equity method investee |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
717 |
|
|
|
717 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BALANCE, MARCH 31, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
143,194 |
|
|
$ |
226,261 |
|
|
$ |
(206,454 |
) |
|
$ |
8,078 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
171,079 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-7
Internet Initiative Japan Inc. and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
Three Years in the Period Ended March 31, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thousands of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Dollars |
|
|
|
Thousands of Yen |
|
|
(Note 1) |
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OPERATING ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
¥ |
2,906,269 |
|
|
¥ |
4,753,570 |
|
|
¥ |
5,409,713 |
|
|
$ |
46,017 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income
to net cash provided by
operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
4,193,093 |
|
|
|
4,209,037 |
|
|
|
4,228,048 |
|
|
|
35,965 |
|
Provision for retirement and
pension costs, less payments |
|
|
70,659 |
|
|
|
76,095 |
|
|
|
382,682 |
|
|
|
3,255 |
|
Provision for (reversal of) allowance for
doubtful accounts and advances |
|
|
24,781 |
|
|
|
(12,009 |
) |
|
|
12,232 |
|
|
|
104 |
|
Loss on disposal of property and
equipment |
|
|
143,887 |
|
|
|
118,855 |
|
|
|
150,731 |
|
|
|
1,282 |
|
Loss on disposal and impairment of telephone rights |
|
|
99,075 |
|
|
|
2,040 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net gain on other investments |
|
|
(2,439,330 |
) |
|
|
(3,197,690 |
) |
|
|
(1,866,510 |
) |
|
|
(15,877 |
) |
Foreign exchange losses (gains) |
|
|
(15,466 |
) |
|
|
(7,825 |
) |
|
|
2,226 |
|
|
|
19 |
|
Gain arising from issuance of common stock by equity method investee |
|
|
(25,933 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss on retirement of convertible notes |
|
|
5,195 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity in net loss of equity method
investees |
|
|
33,208 |
|
|
|
13,746 |
|
|
|
210,199 |
|
|
|
1,788 |
|
Minority interests in earnings of
subsidiaries |
|
|
109,161 |
|
|
|
353,883 |
|
|
|
232,719 |
|
|
|
1,979 |
|
Deferred income tax benefit |
|
|
(11,023 |
) |
|
|
(230,841 |
) |
|
|
(1,494,685 |
) |
|
|
(12,714 |
) |
Others |
|
|
79,247 |
|
|
|
18,490 |
|
|
|
622 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
Changes in operating assets and
liabilities net of effects from
acquisition of business and a company: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Decrease (increase) in accounts
receivable |
|
|
1,607,692 |
|
|
|
(4,460,173 |
) |
|
|
2,376,126 |
|
|
|
20,212 |
|
Decrease (increase) in
inventories, prepaid expenses and
other current and noncurrent assets |
|
|
228,358 |
|
|
|
(1,390,398 |
) |
|
|
(1,235,003 |
) |
|
|
(10,505 |
) |
Increase (decrease) in accounts payable |
|
|
(2,307,729 |
) |
|
|
4,975,623 |
|
|
|
(1,872,969 |
) |
|
|
(15,932 |
) |
Increase in income taxes payable |
|
|
97,913 |
|
|
|
334,854 |
|
|
|
312,292 |
|
|
|
2,656 |
|
Increase in accrued
expenses and other current
and noncurrent liabilities |
|
|
439,440 |
|
|
|
1,001,567 |
|
|
|
553,084 |
|
|
|
4,705 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by
operating
activities(Forward) |
|
¥ |
5,238,497 |
|
|
¥ |
6,558,824 |
|
|
¥ |
7,401,507 |
|
|
$ |
62,959 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Continued)
F-8
Internet Initiative Japan Inc. and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
Three Years in the Period Ended March 31, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thousands of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Dollars |
|
|
|
Thousands of Yen |
|
|
(Note 1) |
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by
operating activities(Forward) |
|
¥ |
5,238,497 |
|
|
¥ |
6,558,824 |
|
|
¥ |
7,401,507 |
|
|
$ |
62,959 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INVESTING ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of property and equipment |
|
|
(577,133 |
) |
|
|
(919,366 |
) |
|
|
(1,287,906 |
) |
|
|
(10,955 |
) |
Purchase of available-for-sale securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(802,662 |
) |
|
|
(6,828 |
) |
Purchase of short-term and other investments |
|
|
(12,566 |
) |
|
|
(674,569 |
) |
|
|
(1,794,358 |
) |
|
|
(15,263 |
) |
Investment in an equity method investee |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(750,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase of subsidiary stock
from minority shareholders |
|
|
(61,680 |
) |
|
|
(192,142 |
) |
|
|
(3,077,764 |
) |
|
|
(26,180 |
) |
Proceeds from sales of available-for-sale securities |
|
|
2,614,768 |
|
|
|
3,240,805 |
|
|
|
3,883,915 |
|
|
|
33,038 |
|
Proceeds from sales and redemption of
short-term and other investments |
|
|
361,249 |
|
|
|
372,434 |
|
|
|
110,446 |
|
|
|
939 |
|
Proceeds from sales of investment in an equity
method investee |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
185,900 |
|
|
|
1,581 |
|
Payments of guarantee deposits |
|
|
(48,683 |
) |
|
|
(62,074 |
) |
|
|
(146,172 |
) |
|
|
(1,243 |
) |
Refund of guarantee deposits |
|
|
71,850 |
|
|
|
568,869 |
|
|
|
27,761 |
|
|
|
236 |
|
Payment for refundable insurance policies |
|
|
(25,231 |
) |
|
|
(25,917 |
) |
|
|
(38,273 |
) |
|
|
(326 |
) |
Refund from insurance policies |
|
|
18,348 |
|
|
|
6,301 |
|
|
|
4,969 |
|
|
|
42 |
|
Acquisition of a newly controlled company, net of
cash acquired |
|
|
|
|
|
|
229,457 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition of business |
|
|
(375,123 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(74,751 |
) |
|
|
(636 |
) |
Other |
|
|
8,204 |
|
|
|
11,052 |
|
|
|
(4,716 |
) |
|
|
(40 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in)
investing activities |
|
|
1,974,003 |
|
|
|
1,804,850 |
|
|
|
(3,013,611 |
) |
|
|
(25,635 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FINANCING ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of short-term
borrowings with initial maturities over three
months and long-term borrowings |
|
|
2,250,000 |
|
|
|
1,000,000 |
|
|
|
10,500,000 |
|
|
|
89,316 |
|
Repayments of short-term borrowings with
initial maturities over three months and
long-term borrowings |
|
|
(1,840,246 |
) |
|
|
(2,986,056 |
) |
|
|
(7,639,963 |
) |
|
|
(64,988 |
) |
Proceeds from securities loan agreement |
|
|
2,546,320 |
|
|
|
4,897,040 |
|
|
|
1,057,680 |
|
|
|
8,997 |
|
Repayments of securities loan agreement |
|
|
(816,800 |
) |
|
|
(5,626,960 |
) |
|
|
(2,057,280 |
) |
|
|
(17,500 |
) |
Principal payments under capital leases |
|
|
(2,867,625 |
) |
|
|
(3,105,519 |
) |
|
|
(3,259,875 |
) |
|
|
(27,729 |
) |
Net decrease in short-term borrowings |
|
|
(1,839,460 |
) |
|
|
(169,633 |
) |
|
|
(3,355,000 |
) |
|
|
(28,538 |
) |
Repurchase of convertible notes |
|
|
(745,488 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Redemption of convertible notes |
|
|
(11,088,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of common stock,
net of issuance cost |
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,030,064 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of subsidiary
stock to minority shareholders |
|
|
188,632 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
194,679 |
|
|
|
1,656 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in)
financing activities(Forward) |
|
¥ |
(14,212,667 |
) |
|
¥ |
38,936 |
|
|
¥ |
(4,559,759 |
) |
|
$ |
(38,786 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Continued)
F-9
Internet Initiative Japan Inc. and Subsidiaries
Consolidated
Statements of Cash Flows
Three Years in the Period Ended March 31, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thousands of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Dollars |
|
|
|
Thousands of Yen |
|
|
(Note 1) |
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in)
financing activities(Forward) |
|
¥ |
(14,212,667 |
) |
|
¥ |
38,936 |
|
|
¥ |
(4,559,759 |
) |
|
$ |
(38,786 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EFFECT OF EXCHANGE RATE
CHANGES ON CASH |
|
|
2,405 |
|
|
|
37,934 |
|
|
|
(614 |
) |
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH |
|
|
(6,997,762 |
) |
|
|
8,440,544 |
|
|
|
(172,477 |
) |
|
|
(1,467 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH, BEGINNING OF YEAR |
|
|
12,284,239 |
|
|
|
5,286,477 |
|
|
|
13,727,021 |
|
|
|
116,766 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH, END OF YEAR |
|
¥ |
5,286,477 |
|
|
¥ |
13,727,021 |
|
|
¥ |
13,554,544 |
|
|
$ |
115,299 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thousands of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Dollars |
|
|
|
Thousands of Yen |
|
|
(Note 1) |
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ADDITIONAL CASH FLOW
INFORMATION: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest paid |
|
¥ |
613,817 |
|
|
¥ |
426,692 |
|
|
¥ |
383,461 |
|
|
$ |
3,262 |
|
Income taxes paid |
|
|
29,227 |
|
|
|
148,101 |
|
|
|
347,826 |
|
|
|
2,959 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NONCASH INVESTING AND
FINANCING ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition of assets by
entering into capital leases |
|
|
4,433,906 |
|
|
|
3,842,952 |
|
|
|
2,664,706 |
|
|
|
22,667 |
|
Exchange of common stock
investment due to merger: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Market value of common
shares acquired |
|
|
37,950 |
|
|
|
7,390 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of investment |
|
|
2,500 |
|
|
|
2,584 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition of business and a company: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets acquired |
|
|
1,202,007 |
|
|
|
843,485 |
|
|
|
236,307 |
|
|
|
2,010 |
|
Cash paid |
|
|
(375,123 |
) |
|
|
(733,589 |
) |
|
|
(74,751 |
) |
|
|
(636 |
) |
Liabilities assumed |
|
|
826,884 |
|
|
|
109,896 |
|
|
|
161,556 |
|
|
|
1,374 |
|
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
(Concluded)
F-10
Internet Initiative Japan Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
1. |
|
DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES |
|
|
|
Internet Initiative Japan Inc. (IIJ, a Japanese corporation) was founded in December 1992 to
develop and operate Internet access services and other Internet-related services in Japan and
is 29.7 percent jointly owned by Nippon Telegraph and Telephone Corporation (NTT) and its
subsidiary as of March 31, 2007. IIJ and subsidiaries (collectively, the Company) provide
Internet access services throughout Japan and into the United States of America and the rest
of Asia. The Company also provides Internet systems design and integration representing
principally sales of Internet network systems and equipment and miscellaneous Internet
access-related services. |
|
|
|
The Company manages its business and measures results based on a single Internet-related
services industry segment. Substantially all revenues are from customers operating in Japan. |
|
|
|
Certain Significant Risks and Uncertainties |
|
|
|
The Company relies on telecommunications carriers for significant portion of network backbone,
and regional NTT subsidiaries, electric power companies and their affiliates for local
connections to customers. Currently, NTT Communications, a wholly owned subsidiary of NTT, is
the largest provider of network infrastructure. The Company believes that its use of multiple
carriers and suppliers significantly mitigates concentrations of credit risk. However, any
disruption of telecommunication services could have an adverse effect on operating results. |
|
|
|
Financial instruments that potentially subject the Company to concentrations of credit risk
consist principally of cash investments, accounts receivable and guarantee deposits. The
Companys management believes that the risks associated with accounts receivable is mitigated
by the large number of customers comprising its customer base. |
|
|
|
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies |
|
|
|
Basis of PresentationIIJ maintains its records in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles in Japan. Certain adjustments and reclassifications have been
incorporated in the accompanying consolidated financial statements to conform to generally
accepted accounting principles in the United States of America (U.S. GAAP). These
adjustments were not recorded in the statutory accounts. |
|
|
|
Certain reclassifications have been made to prior periods to conform to the current year
presentation. |
|
|
|
Translation into U.S. DollarsIIJ maintains its accounts in Japanese yen, the currency of the
country in which it is incorporated and principally operates. The U.S. dollar amounts
included herein represent a translation using the noon buying rate in New York City for cable
transfers in yen as certified for customs purposes by the Federal Reserve Bank of New York at
March 31, 2007 of ¥ 117.56 = $1, solely for the convenience of the reader. The translation
should not be construed as a representation that the yen amounts have been, could have been,
or could in the future be converted into U.S. dollars. |
|
|
|
ConsolidationThe consolidated financial statements include the accounts of IIJ and all of
its subsidiaries, Net Care, Inc. (Net Care), IIJ Technology Inc. (IIJ-Tech), IIJ Media
Communications Inc. (MC), which was merged with IIJ on October 1, 2005, IIJ America, Inc.
(IIJ-A), Netchart Japan Inc. (NCJ), which was established on August 10, 2006 and IIJ
Financial Systems Inc. (IIJ-FS), which all, except for IIJ America, have fiscal years ending
March 31. IIJ Americas fiscal year end is December 31 and such date was used for purposes of
preparing the consolidated financial statements as it is not practicable for the subsidiary to
report its financial results as of March 31. There were no significant events that occurred
during the intervening period that would require adjustment to or disclosure in the
accompanying consolidated financial statements. Intercompany transactions and balances have
been eliminated in consolidation. |
|
|
|
Investments in companies over which IIJ has significant influence but not control are
accounted for by the equity method. For other than a temporary decline in the value of
investments in equity method investees below the carrying amount, the investment is reduced to fair value and an impairment loss is
recognized. |
F-11
|
|
A subsidiary or equity method investee may issue its shares to third parties at amounts per
share in excess of or less than the Companys average per share carrying value. With respect
to such transactions, the resulting gains or losses arising from the change in ownership are
recorded in income for the year in which such shares are issued. |
|
|
|
Use of EstimatesThe preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally
accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that
affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and
liabilities at the date of the financial statements and reported amounts of revenues and
expenses during the reporting period. Significant estimates and assumptions used are
primarily in the areas of evaluation of cost method investments, valuation allowances for
deferred tax assets, allowance for doubtful accounts, determination of pension benefit costs
and obligations, estimated useful lives of fixed assets and impairment of long-lived assets.
Actual results could differ from those estimates. |
|
|
|
Revenue RecognitionRevenues from customer connectivity services consist principally of
dedicated Internet access services and dial-up Internet access services. Dedicated Internet
access services represent full-line IP services and standard-level IP services (IIJ
FiberAccess/F Service). Dial-up Internet access services are provided to both enterprises and
individuals (IIJ4U). The term of these contracts is one year for dedicated Internet access
services and generally one month for dial-up Internet access services. All these services are
billed and recognized monthly on a straight-line basis. |
|
|
|
Value-added service revenues consist principally of sales of various Internet access-related
services such as firewalls services. Value-added services also include monthly fees from data
center services such as housing, monitoring and security services. Other revenues under
connectivity and value-added services consist principally of Wide-area Ethernet services and
call-center customer support. The terms of these services are generally for one year and
revenues are recognized on a straight-line basis during the service period. |
|
|
|
Initial set up fees received in connection with connectivity services and value-added services
are deferred and recognized over the contract period. |
|
|
|
Systems integration revenues consist principally of the development of Internet network
systems and related maintenance, monitoring and other operating services. The development of
the Internet network systems includes planning, systems design, and construction services, and
equipment and software purchased from third parties. Systems integration service is subject to
the Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) Issue No. 00-21, Revenue Arrangements with Multiple
Deliverables. For deliverables in multiple-element arrangements, the guidance below is
applied for separability and allocation. A multiple-element arrangement is separated into more
than one unit of accounting if all of the following criteria are met: |
|
|
|
The delivered item(s) has value to the client on a stand-alone basis; |
|
|
|
There is objective and reliable evidence of the fair value of the undelivered item(s); and |
|
|
|
If the arrangement includes a general right of return relative to the delivered
item(s), delivery or performance of the undelivered item(s) is considered probable and
substantially in the control of the company. |
|
|
|
If these criteria are not met, the arrangement is accounted for as one unit of
accounting which would result in revenue being recognized on a straight-line basis or being deferred until the earlier of when
such criteria are met or when the last undelivered element is delivered. If these criteria are met for each element and there is
objective and reliable evidence of fair value for all units of accounting in an arrangement, the arrangement consideration
is allocated to the separate units of accounting based on each units relative fair value. |
|
|
|
The period for the development of the systems is less than one year and revenues are
recognized when network systems and equipment are delivered and accepted by the customer. When
the equipment or system is delivered prior to other elements of the arrangement, revenue is
deferred until other service elements are completed and accepted by the customer because the
customer may return all of the equipment or system in the event that the Company does not
complete other service elements. Maintenance, monitoring and operating service revenues are
recognized ratably over the separate contract period, which is generally for one year. |
|
|
|
Equipment sales are reported on a gross or net basis in accordance with EITF Issue No. 99-19
Reporting Revenue Gross as a Principal versus Net as an Agent. Revenues are recognized when
equipment is delivered and accepted by the customer. Title to equipment passes when equipment is accepted by the
customer. |
F-12
|
|
Allowance for Doubtful AccountsAn allowance for doubtful accounts is established in amounts
considered to be appropriate based primarily upon the Companys past credit loss experience
and an evaluation of potential losses in the receivables outstanding. |
|
|
|
Other InvestmentsIn accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No.
115, Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities, the Company
classifies its marketable equity securities as available-for-sale securities, which are
accounted for at fair value with unrealized gains and losses excluded from earnings and
reported in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss). The cost of securities sold is
determined based on average cost. |
|
|
|
The Company reviews the fair value of available-for-sale securities on a regular basis to
determine if the fair value of any individual security has declined below its cost and if such
decline is other than temporary. If the decline in value is judged to be other than
temporary, the cost basis of the investment is written down to fair value. Other than
temporary declines in value are determined taking into consideration the extent of decline in
fair value, the length of time that the decline in fair value below cost has existed and
events that might accelerate the recognition of impairment. The resulting realized loss is
included in the consolidated statements of income in the period in which the decline is deemed
to be other than temporary. |
|
|
|
Non-marketable equity securities are carried at cost as fair value is not readily
determinable. If the value of a security is estimated to have declined and such decline is
judged to be other than temporary, the security is written down to the fair value.
Determination of impairment is based on the consideration of such factors as operating
results, business plans and change in the regulatory, economic or technological environment of
the investees. For purposes of computing an impairment loss, fair value is determined as the
Companys interest in the net assets of investees. |
|
|
|
InventoriesInventories consist mainly of network equipment purchased for resale and
work-in-process for development of Internet network systems. Network equipment purchased for
resale is stated at the lower of cost, which is determined by the average-cost method, or
market. Work-in-process for development of network systems is stated at the lower of actual
production costs, including overhead cost, or market. Inventories are reviewed periodically
and items considered to be slow-moving or obsolete are written down to their estimated net
realizable value. |
|
|
|
LeasesCapital leases, which meet specific criteria noted in SFAS No.13, Accounting for
Leases, are capitalized at the inception of the lease at the present value of the minimum
lease payments. All other leases are accounted for as operating leases. Lease payments for
capital leases are apportioned to interest expense and a reduction of the lease liability so
as to achieve a constant rate of interest on the remaining balance of the liability. Operating
lease payments are recognized as an expense on a straight-line basis over the lease term. |
|
|
|
Property and EquipmentProperty and equipment are recorded at cost. Depreciation and
amortization of property and equipment, including purchased software and capital leases, are
computed principally using the straight-line method based on either the estimated useful lives
of assets or the lease period, whichever is shorter. |
|
|
|
The useful lives for depreciation and amortization by major asset classes are as follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Range of |
|
|
Useful Lives |
Data communications, office and other equipment |
|
2 to 15 years |
Leasehold improvements |
|
|
3 to 15 years |
|
Purchased software |
|
5 years |
Capital leases |
|
|
4 to 7 years |
|
|
|
Impairment of Long-lived AssetsLong-lived assets consist principally of property and
equipment, including those items leased under capital leases. The Company evaluates the
impairment of long-lived assets whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the
carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable in accordance with SFAS No. 144,
Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets. There were no impairment
losses for long-lived assets for the three years in the period ended March 31, 2007. |
F-13
|
|
Goodwill and Intangible AssetsIn accordance with SFAS No. 142, Goodwill and Other
Intangible Assets, goodwill (including equity-method goodwill) and intangible assets that are
deemed to have indefinite useful lives are not amortized, but are subject to impairment
testing. Impairment testing is performed annually or more frequently if events or changes in
circumstances indicate that the asset might be impaired. The Company performs annual
impairment tests on March 31. |
|
|
Pension and severance indemnities plansThe Company has pension plans and /or severance
indemnities plans. The cost of the pension plans and severance indemnities plans are accrued
based on amounts determined using actuarial methods. |
|
|
|
On September 29, 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued SFAS No. 158,
Employers Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plans, an
amendment of FASB statements No. 87, 88, 106 and 132(R) (SFAS No. 158). SFAS No. 158
requires an employer that sponsors one or more defined benefit pension plans or other
postretirement plans to 1) recognize the funded status of a plan, measured as the difference
between plan assets at fair value and the benefit obligation, in balance sheet; 2) recognize
in shareholders equity as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income, net of tax,
the gains and losses and prior service costs or credits that arise during the period but are
not yet recognized as components of net periodic benefit cost; 3) measure defined benefit plan
assets and obligations as of the date of the employers fiscal year-end balance sheet; and 4)
disclose in the notes to the financial statements additional information about the effects on
net periodic benefit cost for the next fiscal year that arise from delayed recognition of the
gains or losses, prior service costs or credits, and transition asset or obligation. The
Company adopted SFAS No. 158 effective March 31, 2007. The adoption of SFAS No. 158 resulted
in a decrease in total shareholder equity of ¥111,731 thousand ($950 thousand) as of March
31, 2007. For further information regarding the impact of the
adoption of SFAS No. 158, refer to
Note 10. |
|
|
|
Income TaxesThe provision for income taxes is based on earnings before income taxes and
includes the effects of temporary differences between assets and liabilities recognized for
financial reporting purposes and income tax purposes and operating loss carryforwards.
Valuation allowances are provided against deferred tax assets when it is more likely than not
that a tax benefit will not be realized. |
|
|
|
Foreign Currency TranslationForeign currency financial statements have been translated in
accordance with SFAS No. 52, Foreign Currency Translation. Pursuant to this statement, the
assets and liabilities of a foreign subsidiary and an equity method investee are translated
into Japanese yen at the respective year-end exchange rates. All income and expense accounts
are translated at average rates of exchange. The resulting translation adjustments are
included in accumulated other comprehensive income. |
|
|
|
Foreign currency assets and liabilities, which consist substantially of cash denominated in
U.S. dollars, are stated at the amount as computed by using year-end exchange rates and the
resulting transaction gain or loss is recognized in earnings. |
|
|
|
Derivative Financial InstrumentsAll derivatives are recorded at fair value as either asset
or liabilities in the balance sheet in accordance with SFAS No. 133, Accounting for
Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, as amended by SFAS No. 138 and No. 149
(collectively, SFAS No. 133). In accordance with SFAS No. 133, the Company designated
interest swap contracts as a hedge of the variability of cash flows to be paid related to
interest on floating rate borrowings (cash flow hedge) and the effective portion of the
derivatives gain or loss is initially reported as a component of other comprehensive income
and subsequently reclassified into earnings when the underlying transaction affects earnings.
The ineffective portion of the gain or loss is reported in earning immediately. The Company
enters into contracts to hedge interest rate risks and does not enter into contracts or
utilize derivatives for trading purposes. |
|
|
|
Stock-based Compensation On April 1, 2006, the Company adopted SFAS No. 123R, Share-Based
Payment and the related interpretations, which requires compensation expense for stock options
and other share-based payments to be measured and recorded based on the instruments fair
value, by using the modified prospective application method. SFAS No. 123R requires
recognizing expenses for share-based payments granted prior to the adoption date equal to the
fair value of unvested amounts over the remaining requisite service period. The portion of
these share-based payments fair value attributable to vested awards prior to the adoption of
SFAS No. 123R is never recognized. As all existing granted stock-based awards of the Company
have vested, the adoption of SFAS No. 123R did not have any impact on the Companys
consolidated financial position or results of operations.
|
|
|
|
Prior to April 1, 2006, the Company accounted for stock-based compensation using the intrinsic
value method prescribed in Accounting Principle Board Opinion (APB) No. 25, Accounting for
Stock Issued to Employers and related interpretations.
|
F-14
|
|
Research and DevelopmentResearch and development costs are expensed as incurred. |
|
|
|
AdvertisingAdvertising costs are expensed as incurred and are recorded in Sales and
marketing. |
|
|
|
Basic and Diluted Net Income per Common ShareBasic net income per common share is computed
by dividing net income by the weighted-average number of shares of common stock outstanding
during the year. Diluted net income per common share reflects the potential dilutive effect
of stock options and convertible bonds. |
|
|
|
Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)Other comprehensive income (loss) consists of translation
adjustments resulting from the translation of financial statements of a foreign subsidiary,
unrealized gains or losses on available-for-sale securities and gains or losses on cash flow
hedging derivative instruments. |
|
|
|
Segment Reporting SFAS No. 131, Disclosures about Segments of an Enterprise and Related
Information, establishes standards for reporting information about operating segments.
Operating segments are defined as components of an enterprise that engage in business
activities from which it may earn revenues and incur expense and for which separate financial
information is available that is evaluated regularly by the chief operation decision maker in
deciding how to allocate resources and in assessing performance. |
|
|
|
The Company provides a comprehensive range of network solutions to meet its customers needs
by cross-selling a variety of services, including Internet connectivity services, value-added
services, systems integration and sales of network-related equipment. The Companys chief
operating decision maker, who is the Companys Chief Executive Officer, regularly reviews the
revenue and cost of sales on a consolidated basis and makes decisions regarding how to
allocate resources and assess performance based on a single operating unit. |
|
|
|
New Accounting Standards |
|
|
|
In June 2006, the FASB issued FIN No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes, an
interpretation of FASB statement No. 109 (FIN No. 48) which clarifies the accounting for
uncertainty in income tax recognized in an enterprises financial statements in accordance
with SFAS No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes. This interpretation prescribes a recognition
threshold and measurement attribute for the financial statement recognition and measurement of
a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. This interpretation also
provides guidance on derecognition, classification, interest, and penalties, accounting in
interim periods, disclosure, and transition. FIN No. 48 is effective for fiscal years
beginning after December 15, 2006. The adoption of FIN No. 48 will not have a material effect
upon the Companys financial position or results of operations. |
|
|
|
In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements which defines
fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in generally accepted accounting
principles, and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. This Statement applies
under other accounting pronouncements that require or permit fair value measurements and is
effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. The Company is currently
evaluating the impact of adopting this Statement. |
|
|
|
In September 2006, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) staff published Staff
Accounting Bulletin No. 108, Considering the Effects of Prior Year Misstatements when
Quantifying Misstatements in Current Year Financial Statements (SAB No. 108). SAB No. 108
provides guidance on the consideration of the effects of prior year misstatements in
quantifying current year misstatements for the purpose of a materiality assessment. SAB No.
108 requires quantification of the effects of financial statements errors on each of the
balance sheets and statements of income and the related financial statements disclosures. The
Company adopted SAB No. 108 effective March 31, 2007. The adoption of SAB No. 108 did not have
a material effect upon the Companys financial position or results of operations. |
|
|
|
In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No.
159, The Fair Value Option for Financial
Assets and Financial Liabilities, which
permits entities to choose to measure many
financial instruments and certain other
items at fair value. This Statements
objective is to improve financial
reporting by providing entities with the
opportunity to mitigate volatility in
reported earnings caused by measuring
related assets and liabilities differently
without having to apply complex hedge
accounting provisions. SFAS No. 159 is
effective for fiscal years beginning after
November 15, 2007. The Company is
currently evaluating the impact of
adopting this Statement. |
F-15
2. |
|
OTHER INVESTMENTS |
|
|
|
Pursuant to SFAS No. 115, all of the Companys marketable equity securities were classified as
available-for-sale securities. Information regarding the securities classified as
available-for-sale at March 31, 2006 and 2007 is as follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thousands of Yen |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Fair |
|
March 31, 2006 |
|
Cost |
|
|
Gains |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available-for-saleEquity
securities |
|
¥ |
222,807 |
|
|
¥ |
6,552,623 |
|
|
¥ |
42 |
|
|
¥ |
6,775,388 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available-for-saleEquity
securities |
|
¥ |
252,988 |
|
|
¥ |
1,057,288 |
|
|
¥ |
12,582 |
|
|
¥ |
1,297,694 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thousands of U.S. Dollars |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Fair |
|
March 31, 2007 |
|
Cost |
|
|
Gains |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available-for-saleEquity
securities |
|
$ |
2,153 |
|
|
$ |
8,993 |
|
|
$ |
107 |
|
|
$ |
11,039 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table provides the fair value and gross unrealized losses of the Companys
investments, which have been deemed to be temporarily impaired, aggregated by investment
category and length of time that individual securities have been in a continuous unrealized
loss position, as of March 31, 2006 and 2007: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thousands of Yen |
|
|
|
Less than |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12 Months |
|
|
12 Months or More |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
March 31, 2006 |
|
Value |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available-for-saleEquity
securities |
|
¥ |
1,338 |
|
|
¥ |
42 |
|
|
¥ |
|
|
|
¥ |
|
|
|
¥ |
1,338 |
|
|
¥ |
42 |
|
|
March 31, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available-for-saleEquity
securities |
|
¥ |
37,398 |
|
|
¥ |
12,582 |
|
|
¥ |
|
|
|
¥ |
|
|
|
¥ |
37,398 |
|
|
¥ |
12,582 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thousands of U.S. Dollars |
|
|
|
Less than |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12 Months |
|
|
12 Months or More |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
March 31, 2007 |
|
Value |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available-for-saleEquity
securities |
|
$ |
318 |
|
|
$ |
107 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
318 |
|
|
$ |
107 |
|
|
|
The Company regularly reviews all of the Companys investments to determine if any are
other-than-temporarily impaired. The analysis includes reviewing industry analyst reports, sector credit
ratings and volatility of the securitys market price. |
|
|
|
The Companys unrealized loss on investments in marketable equity security relates to a
management company which owns and operates golf courses and a Japanese commercial bank. The
fair value of each investment is 26% and 25% less than its cost, respectively. The duration of
the unrealized loss position was less than 6 months. Based on the Companys ability and intent
to hold the investment for a reasonable period of time sufficient for a recovery of fair
value, the Company does not consider the investment to be other-than-temporarily impaired at
March 31, 2007. |
F-16
|
|
Proceeds from the sale of available-for-sale securities were ¥2,614,768 thousand, ¥3,240,805
thousand and ¥3,883,915 thousand ($33,038 thousand) for the years ended March 31, 2005, 2006
and 2007, respectively. Gross realized gains of ¥2,477,607 thousand, ¥3,222,397 thousand and
¥3,242,257 thousand ($27,580 thousand) were included in other income (expenses) for the year
ended March 31, 2005, 2006 and 2007, respectively, and gross realized losses of ¥12,358
thousand ($105 thousand) were included in other income (expenses) for the year ended March 31,
2007. |
|
|
|
The aggregate cost of the Companys cost method investments totaled ¥1,245,317 thousand and ¥
1,544,047 thousand ($13,134 thousand) at March 31, 2006 and 2007, respectively. |
|
|
|
Losses on write-down of investments in certain marketable and nonmarketable equity securities,
included in other income (expenses), were recognized to reflect the decline in value
considered to be other than temporary, which were ¥34,151 thousand and ¥118,076 thousand,
respectively, for the year ended March 31, 2005. Such losses in certain nonmarketable equity
securities, included in other income (expenses), were ¥29,513 thousand and ¥1,363,389 thousand
($11,598 thousand) for the years ended March 31, 2006 and 2007, respectively. |
|
|
|
Gains on exchange of securities of ¥35,450 thousand and ¥ 4,806 thousand, included in other
income (expenses), for the year ended March 31, 2005 and 2006, respectively, represented
non-monetary gains from the exchange of marketable common shares in a merger transaction. |
|
|
|
In Japan, there is a market in which participants lend and borrow debt and equity
securities without collateral from financial institutions under agreements known as lending
and borrowing debt and equity securities contracts. Under the agreement, the Company loans
equity securities without collateral. The Company has loaned ¥324,000 thousand and ¥218,000
thousand ($1,854 thousand) of available-for-sale securities to the financial institution as of
March 31, 2006 and 2007, respectively. |
3. |
|
ALLOWANCE FOR DOUBTFUL ACCOUNTS AND ADVANCES |
|
|
|
An analysis of the allowance for doubtful accounts and advances for the years ended March 31,
2005, 2006 and 2007 is as follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thousands of Yen |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Reversal of) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Doubtful |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning of |
|
|
Credits |
|
|
Accounts and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at |
|
|
|
Year |
|
|
Charged Off |
|
|
Advances |
|
|
Reclassification |
|
|
End of Year |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended March 31, 2005 |
|
¥ |
492,605 |
|
|
¥ |
(68,516 |
) |
|
¥ |
24,781 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
¥ |
448,870 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended March 31, 2006 |
|
¥ |
448,870 |
|
|
¥ |
(357,519 |
) |
|
¥ |
(12,009 |
) |
|
¥ |
35,000 |
|
|
¥ |
114,342 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended March 31, 2007 |
|
¥ |
114,342 |
|
|
¥ |
(3,764 |
) |
|
¥ |
12,232 |
|
|
¥ |
|
|
|
¥ |
122,810 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thousands of U.S.dollars |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reversal of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Doubtful |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning of |
|
|
Credits |
|
|
Accounts and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at |
|
|
|
Year |
|
|
Charged Off |
|
|
Advances |
|
|
Reclassification |
|
|
End of Year |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended March 31, 2007 |
|
$ |
973 |
|
|
$ |
(33 |
) |
|
$ |
104 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,044 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The credits charged off for the year ended March 31, 2006 included the reversal of allowance
for doubtful accounts of Crosswave, the former equity method investee, amounted to ¥345,994
thousand due to the final distribution of remaining assets of Crosswave under the corporate
reorganization proceedings.
|
F-17
4. |
|
INVESTMENTS IN AND ADVANCES TO EQUITY METHOD INVESTEES |
|
|
|
IIJ utilizes various companies in Japan and neighboring countries to form and operate its
Internet business. Businesses operated by its equity method investees include connectivity
services in Asian countries (Asia Internet Holding Co., Ltd., AIH) through September 2005,
Web page design services (atom Co., Ltd., atom) through March 2007, multifeed technology
services and location facilities for connecting high-speed Internet backbones (Internet
Multifeed Co., Multifeed), data center services in Asian countries ( i-Heart Inc., i-Heart
and Ayalaport Makati Inc., Ayalaport through June, 2004) and comprehensive portal sites
operations (Internet Revolution Inc., i-revo). |
|
|
|
Since July 2004, Ayalaport is no longer accounted for under equity method due to dilution of
the Companys ownership and loss of ability to exercise significant influence. |
|
|
|
AIH was no longer an equity method investee after October 1, 2005 since AIH was merged with
IIJ. |
|
|
|
On March 28, 2007, IIJ sold all its shares in atom for ¥185,900 thousand ($1,581 thousand)
with a gain of ¥252 thousand ($2 thousand). IIJ accounted for atom as an equity method
investee through March 2007. It was not an equity method investee as of March 31, 2007. |
|
|
|
The aggregate amounts of balances and transactions of the Company with these equity method
investees as of March 31, 2006 and 2007, and for each of the three years in the period ended
March 31, 2007 are summarized as follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thousands of |
|
|
|
Thousands of Yen |
|
|
U.S. Dollars |
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable |
|
¥ |
|
|
|
¥ |
253,208 |
|
|
¥ |
43,628 |
|
|
$ |
371 |
|
Accounts payable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,084 |
|
|
|
15,808 |
|
|
|
134 |
|
Revenues |
|
|
1,245,361 |
|
|
|
1,286,275 |
|
|
|
481,850 |
|
|
|
4,080 |
|
Costs and expenses |
|
|
1,145,834 |
|
|
|
656,184 |
|
|
|
172,971 |
|
|
|
1,471 |
|
|
|
During each of the three years in the period ended March 31, 2007, the Company did not receive
any dividends from its equity method investees. |
|
|
|
The Companys investments in and advances to these equity method investees and respective
ownership percentage at March 31, 2006 and 2007 consisted of the following: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thousands of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thousands of Yen |
|
|
U.S. Dollars |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Multifeed |
|
|
29.44 |
% |
|
¥ |
317,144 |
|
|
|
29.72 |
% |
|
¥ |
461,750 |
|
|
$ |
3,928 |
|
atom |
|
|
40.00 |
|
|
|
116,974 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
i-revo |
|
|
30.00 |
|
|
|
676,795 |
|
|
|
30.00 |
|
|
|
328,435 |
|
|
|
2,793 |
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
52,058 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
68,305 |
|
|
|
581 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
¥ |
1,162,971 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
¥ |
858,490 |
|
|
$ |
7,302 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Advances of ¥34,545 thousand ($294 thousand ) to i-Heart, net of loan loss valuation allowance
were included in the Other balances as of March 31, 2006 and 2007. |
F-18
|
|
|
5. |
|
PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT |
|
|
Property and equipment as of March 31, 2006 and 2007 consisted of the following: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thousands of |
|
|
|
Thousands of Yen |
|
|
U.S. Dollars |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Data communications equipment |
|
¥ |
781,605 |
|
|
¥ |
807,528 |
|
|
$ |
6,869 |
|
Office and other equipment |
|
|
718,362 |
|
|
|
782,666 |
|
|
|
6,657 |
|
Leasehold improvements |
|
|
780,143 |
|
|
|
802,220 |
|
|
|
6,824 |
|
Purchased software |
|
|
5,425,819 |
|
|
|
6,202,794 |
|
|
|
52,763 |
|
Assets under capital leases, primarily data
communications equipment |
|
|
14,458,667 |
|
|
|
13,000,872 |
|
|
|
110,589 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
22,164,596 |
|
|
|
21,596,080 |
|
|
|
183,702 |
|
Less accumulated depreciation
and amortization |
|
|
(11,865,100 |
) |
|
|
(11,763,684 |
) |
|
|
(100,065 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and equipmentnet |
|
¥ |
10,299,496 |
|
|
¥ |
9,832,396 |
|
|
$ |
83,637 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6. |
|
GOODWILL AND INTANGIBLE ASSETS |
|
|
The components of intangible assets as of March 31, 2006 and 2007 are as follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thousands of |
|
|
|
Thousands of Yen |
|
|
U.S. Dollars |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-amortized intangible assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Telephone rights |
|
¥ |
12,555 |
|
|
¥ |
12,534 |
|
|
$ |
107 |
|
Customer relationship |
|
|
113,360 |
|
|
|
1,477,412 |
|
|
|
12,567 |
|
Backlog |
|
|
|
|
|
|
696 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
506,679 |
|
|
|
1,386,252 |
|
|
|
11,792 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total intangible assets |
|
¥ |
632,594 |
|
|
¥ |
2,876,894 |
|
|
$ |
24,472 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During the years ended March 31, 2005 and 2006, the Company recorded disposal losses of
¥73,271 thousand and ¥2,040 thousand, respectively, on telephone rights, which were not used
by the Company upon cancellation of the contracts for the usage of telephone circuits for
dial-up access services and the disposal loss was included in general and administrative
expenses. |
|
|
NTT reduced the price of telephone rights by 50 percent after March 1, 2005 and the
Company recorded an impairment loss of ¥25,804 thousand on telephone rights based on the new
purchase price. The impairment loss was included in general and administrative expenses for
the year ended March 31, 2005. |
|
|
Goodwill of ¥73,444 thousand and ¥879,573 thousand ($7,482 thousand) was recorded for the
years ended March 31, 2006 and 2007, respectively. |
|
|
On October 1, 2004, IIJ-FS, a 100 percent owned subsidiary of IIJ-Tech, which was a 69 percent
owned subsidiary of IIJ at October 1, 2004, purchased the securities systems development and
operation business from Yamatane Co.,Ltd (Yamatane) in order to initiate a business
relationship with Yamatanes customer base. The primary factor that contributed to the
recognition of goodwill was an assembled workforce. The results of operations of this business
are included in the statement of income of the Company from October 1, 2004. The cash paid for
this business was ¥375,123 thousand including incremental costs directly related to the
transaction. The Company acquired an order backlog of ¥6,254 thousand, customer relationships
valued at ¥113,360 thousand and recorded goodwill of ¥251,127 thousand in the transaction.
The backlog became fully amortized during the year ended March 31, 2005. The pro forma impact
of the acquisition of the business operations of Yamatane on consolidated revenues and net
income of the Company, assuming the acquisition had been completed at the beginning of the
year ended March 31, 2005, would have been an increase to consolidated revenues of ¥1.2
billion and an increase to net income of ¥56 million in the year ended March 31, 2005. |
F-19
|
|
IIJ established NCJ, a 100 percent owned subsidiary in August, 2006. NCJ purchased the
systems integration and network engineering business from Netchart Japan Corporation on
October 1, 2006 and then started its business. The results of operations of this business are
included in the statement of income of the Company from October 1, 2006. The cash paid for
this business was ¥74,752 thousand ($636 thousand). The factor that contributed to the
recognition of goodwill was an assembled workforce. The Company acquired an order backlog of
¥874 thousand ($7 thousand), customer relationships valued at ¥34,065 thousand ($290 thousand)
and recorded goodwill of ¥1,349 thousand ($11 thousand) in the transaction. The backlog became
fully amortized during the year ended March 31, 2007. The pro forma impact of the acquisition
of the business on consolidated revenues and net income of the Company, assuming the
acquisition had been completed at the beginning of the year ended March 31, 2006 and the year
ended March 31, 2007, would have been an increase to consolidated revenues of ¥1.2 billion
($10 million) and ¥0.5 billion ($4 million), respectively, and a decrease to net income of ¥25
million ($215 thousand) and ¥77 million ($656 thousand), respectively. |
|
|
On March 30, 2007, IIJ purchased the shares of IIJ-Tech from its minority shareholders for
¥2,725,205 thousand ($23,181 thousand) by cash, in order to acquire the additional interests
in IIJ-Tech. The Company acquired an order backlog of ¥696 thousand ($6 thousand), customer
relationships valued at ¥1,329,987 thousand ($11,313 thousand) and recorded goodwill of
¥751,266 thousand ($6,390 thousand) in the transaction. The backlog will be fully amortized
during the year ending March 31, 2008. |
|
|
No impairment on goodwill was recognized during the years ended March 31, 2005, 2006 and
2007. |
|
|
The Company enters into, in the normal course of business, various leases for domestic and
international backbone services, office premises, network operation centers and data communications and
other equipment. Certain leases that meet one or more of the criteria set forth in the
provision of SFAS No. 13, Accounting for leases have been classified as capital leases and
the others have been classified as operating leases. |
|
|
A portion of the Companys sales result from multi-year lease agreements, under which the
company leased some network equipment to customers. The leases are classified as sale-type
leases which the Company accounts for in accordance with SFAS No. 13. |
|
|
Operating LeasesThe Company has operating lease agreements with telecommunications carriers
and others for the use of connectivity lines, including local access lines that customers use
to connect to IIJs network. The leases for domestic backbone connectivity are generally
non-cancelable for a minimum one-year lease period. The leases for international backbone
connectivity during one-year lease period are substantially non-cancelable. The Company also
leases its office premises, for which refundable lease deposits are capitalized as guarantee
deposits, and certain office equipment under non-cancelable operating leases which expire on
various dates through the year 2009 and also leases its network operation centers under
non-cancelable operating leases. |
|
|
Refundable guarantee deposits as of March 31, 2006 and 2007 consist of as follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thousands of |
|
|
|
Thousands of Yen |
|
|
U.S. Dollars |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Head office |
|
¥ |
1,185,307 |
|
|
¥ |
1,185,307 |
|
|
$ |
10,083 |
|
Sales and subsidiaries offices |
|
|
308,494 |
|
|
|
438,211 |
|
|
|
3,727 |
|
Others |
|
|
55,852 |
|
|
|
62,623 |
|
|
|
533 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total refundable guarantee deposits |
|
¥ |
1,549,653 |
|
|
¥ |
1,686,141 |
|
|
$ |
14,343 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lease expenses related to backbone lines for the years ended March 31, 2005, 2006 and 2007
amounted to ¥3,550,885 thousand, ¥3,516,322 thousand and ¥3,515,934 thousand ($29,908
thousand), respectively. Lease expenses for local access lines for the years ended March 31,
2005, 2006 and 2007, which are only attributable to dedicated access revenues, amounted to
¥4,040,192 thousand, ¥4,558,382 thousand and ¥4,616,413 thousand ($39,269 thousand),
respectively. Other lease expenses for the years ended March 31, 2005, 2006 and 2007 amounted
to ¥3,303,717 thousand, ¥3,653,766 thousand and ¥4,381,951 thousand ($37,274 thousand),
respectively. |
|
|
The Company has subleased a part of its office premises. Lease expenses mentioned above have been
reduced by sublease revenues totaling ¥406,451 thousand, ¥435,224 thousand and ¥22,034
thousand ($187 thousand) for the years ended March 31, 2005, 2006 and 2007, respectively. |
F-20
|
|
Capital LeasesThe Company conducts its connectivity and other services by using data
communications and other equipment leased under capital lease arrangements. The fair values of
the assets upon execution of the capital lease agreements and accumulated depreciation amounted
to ¥14,458,667 thousand and ¥6,819,503 thousand at March 31, 2006 and ¥ 13,000,872 thousand
($110,589 thousand) and ¥6,101,574 thousand ($51,902 thousand) at March 31, 2007, respectively. |
|
|
As of March 31, 2007, future lease payments under non-cancelable operating leases, including the
aforementioned non-cancelable connectivity lease agreements (but excluding dedicated access
lines which the Company charges outright to customers), and capital leases were as follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thousands of Yen |
|
|
Thousands of U.S. Dollars |
|
|
|
Connectivity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Connectivity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lines |
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lines |
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating |
|
|
Operating |
|
|
Capital |
|
|
Operating |
|
|
Operating |
|
|
Capital |
|
|
|
Leases |
|
|
Leases |
|
|
Leases |
|
|
Leases |
|
|
Leases |
|
|
Leases |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ending March 31: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008 |
|
¥ |
38,520 |
|
|
¥ |
1,468,267 |
|
|
¥ |
3,201,825 |
|
|
$ |
328 |
|
|
$ |
12,490 |
|
|
$ |
27,236 |
|
2009 |
|
|
38,520 |
|
|
|
516,252 |
|
|
|
2,465,381 |
|
|
|
328 |
|
|
|
4,391 |
|
|
|
20,971 |
|
2010 |
|
|
38,520 |
|
|
|
163,681 |
|
|
|
1,342,670 |
|
|
|
328 |
|
|
|
1,392 |
|
|
|
11,421 |
|
2011 |
|
|
19,051 |
|
|
|
21,541 |
|
|
|
593,936 |
|
|
|
161 |
|
|
|
183 |
|
|
|
5,052 |
|
2012 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,970 |
|
|
|
89,425 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
136 |
|
|
|
761 |
|
2013 and thereafter |
|
|
|
|
|
|
40,112 |
|
|
|
6,623 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
341 |
|
|
|
56 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total minimum lease payments |
|
¥ |
134,611 |
|
|
¥ |
2,225,823 |
|
|
¥ |
7,699,860 |
|
|
$ |
1,145 |
|
|
$ |
18,933 |
|
|
$ |
65,497 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less amounts representing interest |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
428,378 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,643 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Present value of net minimum capital
lease payments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,271,482 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
61,854 |
|
Less current portion |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,953,173 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,121 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noncurrent portion |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
¥ |
4,318,309 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
36,733 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales-type LeasesThe Company has some sales-type lease agreements with customers. The Company
recognize revenues on sales-type leases when the assets under lease are delivered to and
accepted by the customers. The revenue recognized is calculated at the net present value of the
future payment amounts. Interest income in sales-type leases is recognized in other income using
the interest method. |
|
|
The components of the net investment in sales-type leases as of March 31, 2007 were as follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thousands of
Yen |
|
|
Thousands of U.S. Dollars |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ending March 31: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008 |
|
¥ |
348,188 |
|
|
$ |
2,961 |
|
2009 |
|
|
359,780 |
|
|
|
3,060 |
|
2010 |
|
|
239,781 |
|
|
|
2,040 |
|
2011 |
|
|
239,781 |
|
|
|
2,040 |
|
2012 |
|
|
19,982 |
|
|
|
170 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total minimum lease payments to be received* |
|
¥ |
1,207,512 |
|
|
$ |
10,271 |
|
Estimated residual value of leased property (unguaranteed) |
|
|
215,917 |
|
|
|
1,837 |
|
Less unearned income |
|
|
68,599 |
|
|
|
583 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net investment in sales-type leases |
|
|
1,354,830 |
|
|
|
11,525 |
|
Less current portion |
|
|
320,530 |
|
|
|
2,727 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-current net investment in sales-type leases |
|
¥ |
1,034,300 |
|
|
$ |
8,798 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Estimated executory costs, including profit thereon, of ¥263,245 thousand ($2,239 thousand)
were excluded from total minimum lease payments to be received. |
F-21
|
|
Short-term borrowings at March 31, 2006 and 2007 consist of bank overdrafts. Short-term
borrowings bear fixed and variable-rate interest and their weighted average rates at March 31, 2006 and
2007 were 1.375 percent and 1.141 percent, respectively. |
|
|
Long-term borrowings as of March 31, 2006 and 2007 consisted of the following: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thousands of |
|
|
|
Thousands of Yen |
|
|
U.S. Dollars |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unsecured long-term loans payable to
banks, maturing at various dates
through calendar 2007.
Interest is payable at a variable rate. Weighted average interest rates were 2.206
percent
and 3.815 percent at March 31, 2006 and 2007,
respectively. |
|
¥ |
374,000 |
|
|
¥ |
40,000 |
|
|
$ |
340 |
|
Unsecured long-term loans payable to
banks, maturing in calendar 2006. Weighted average interest rates were 1.710
percent
at March 31, 2006 |
|
|
600,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unsecured long-term loans payable to
banks, maturing at various dates through calendar
2007. Interest is payable at a variable
rate based on TIBOR which was 0.133 percent and
0.706 percent as of March 31, 2006 and 2007,
respectively.
Weighted average interest rates were 1.130 percent
and 1.706 percent at March 31, 2006 and 2007,
respectively. |
|
|
1,150,000 |
|
|
|
250,000 |
|
|
|
2,127 |
|
Long-term installment loans payable at
various dates through calendar 2007. Interest rates were 2.55 percent
at March 31, 2006. |
|
|
155,963 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
2,279,963 |
|
|
|
290,000 |
|
|
|
2,467 |
|
Less current portion |
|
|
(1,989,963 |
) |
|
|
(290,000 |
) |
|
|
(2,467 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term borrowings, less current
portion |
|
¥ |
290,000 |
|
|
¥ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company entered into interest rate swap contracts to manage its interest rate exposure
resulting in a fixed interest rate for a portion of its long-term debt. The effective
weighted average interest rates for ¥1,150,000 thousand and ¥250,000 thousand ($2,127
thousand) of the long-term loan outstanding at March 31, 2006 and 2007 after giving effect to
such swap agreements were 1.781 percent and 1.670 percent per annum, respectively. |
|
|
On March 14, 2003, the Company entered into a long-term installment loan agreement with a
leasing company to finance the payment for rental deposits given to other lessor for its new
head office. The principal of the loan was ¥155,963 thousand at March 31, 2006 and the loan
was secured by a first priority pledge against a claim for the guarantee deposits. The Company
fully paid off the long-term installment loan in March 2007. |
|
|
Substantially all short-term and long-term bank borrowings are made under agreements which, as
is customary in Japan, provide that under certain conditions the bank may require the borrower
to provide collateral (or additional collateral) or guarantor with respect to the borrowings
and that the bank may treat any collateral, whether furnished as security for short-term or
long-term loans or otherwise, as collateral for all indebtedness to such bank. Also,
provisions of certain loan agreements grant certain rights of possession to the lenders in the
event of default. The Company did not provide banks with any collateral for outstanding loans
as of March 31, 2007. |
F-22
|
|
The Company entered into bank overdraft agreements with certain Japanese banks for which the
unused balance outstanding as of March 31, 2007 was ¥13,370,000 thousand ($113,729 thousand). |
|
|
Since August 2004, the Company had been a party to a securities loan agreement with a
Japanese financial institution. The Company loaned available-for-sale securities to the
financial institution and received cash in return in the transaction. These transactions were
accounted for as secured borrowings and the cash received was recorded as payable under the
securities loan agreement and securities lent were recorded as other investments. The
agreement required the Company to provide certain marketable securities as collateral at the
commencement of the transaction. The Company was required to make a partial repayment or
receive additional borrowings depending on the market value of securities pledged. The
Company paid the interest on the payables at a variable rate, which was 0.37 percent and 0.76
percent as of March 31, 2006 and March 27, 2007,
respectively. On March 27, 2007, the Company paid off the
loan and took the available-for-sale securities loaned back since the agreement expired on
that date. |
|
|
Income taxes imposed by the national, prefectural and municipal governments of Japan resulted
in a normal statutory rate of approximately 41 percent for the years ended March 31, 2005,
2006 and 2007. |
|
|
The reserve for tax contingencies related to the denial of the use of tax operating loss
carryforwards by IIJ America, a U.S. subsidiary, was ¥197,753 thousand as of March 31, 2006. |
|
|
In September 2006, IIJ America filed an application with the Internal Revenue Service (IRS)
for the Bilateral Advance Pricing Agreement Request (BAPA), relating to the terms of transactions
with IIJ and the use of the tax operating loss carryforwards in its taxation. IIJ America reversed
the reserve for the potential penalty relating to the past use of the tax operating loss
carryforwards of ¥108,782 thousand ($925 thousand) after filing the application with the IRS,
leaving a remaining balance of ¥102,310 thousand ($870 thousand) as of March 31, 2007. The Company
believed that IRS would not impose tax penalty if the Company applied the BAPA. This is
managements best estimate of the potential liability for tax contingencies. |
F-23
|
|
Income from operations before income tax expense (benefit), minority interests and equity
in net loss of equity method investees and income tax expense for the years ended March 31,
2005, 2006, and 2007 consists of the following components: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thousands of |
|
|
|
Thousands of Yen |
|
|
U.S. Dollars |
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Income from operations before income tax
expense (benefit), minority interests and equity in net loss
of equity method investees: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Domestic |
|
¥ |
3,168,974 |
|
|
¥ |
5,316,535 |
|
|
¥ |
5,055,155 |
|
|
$ |
43,000 |
|
Foreign |
|
|
(20,466 |
) |
|
|
62,024 |
|
|
|
(6,467 |
) |
|
|
(55 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
¥ |
3,148,508 |
|
|
¥ |
5,378,559 |
|
|
¥ |
5,048,688 |
|
|
$ |
42,945 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income taxescurrent: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Domestic |
|
¥ |
110,893 |
|
|
¥ |
289,376 |
|
|
¥ |
798,922 |
|
|
$ |
6,796 |
|
Foreign |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
198,825 |
|
|
|
(108,180 |
) |
|
|
(920 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
¥ |
110,893 |
|
|
¥ |
488,201 |
|
|
¥ |
690,742 |
|
|
$ |
5,876 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income taxesdeferred: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Domestic |
|
¥ |
(11,023 |
) |
|
¥ |
(230,841 |
) |
|
¥ |
(1,494,685 |
) |
|
$ |
(12,714 |
) |
Foreign |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
¥ |
(11,023 |
) |
|
¥ |
(230,841 |
) |
|
¥ |
(1,494,685 |
) |
|
$ |
(12,714 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net deferred income tax assets and liabilities are reflected on the consolidated balance sheets
as of March 31, 2006 and 2007 as follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thousands of |
|
|
|
Thousands of Yen |
|
|
U.S. Dollars |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current AssetsOther current assets |
|
¥ |
138,938 |
|
|
¥ |
427,079 |
|
|
$ |
3,633 |
|
Noncurrent AssetsOther assets |
|
|
193,681 |
|
|
|
1,392,144 |
|
|
|
11,842 |
|
Noncurrent liabilitiesOther noncurrent liabilities |
|
|
(83,127 |
) |
|
|
(40,652 |
) |
|
|
(346 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
¥ |
249,492 |
|
|
¥ |
1,778,571 |
|
|
$ |
15,129 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The approximate effect of temporary differences and carryforwards giving rise to deferred tax
balances at March 31, 2006 and 2007 was as follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thousands of |
|
|
|
Thousands of Yen |
|
|
U.S. Dollars |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
Deferred |
|
|
Deferred |
|
|
Deferred |
|
|
Deferred |
|
|
Deferred |
|
|
Deferred |
|
|
|
Tax |
|
|
Tax |
|
|
Tax |
|
|
Tax |
|
|
Tax |
|
|
Tax |
|
|
|
Assets |
|
|
Liabilities |
|
|
Assets |
|
|
Liabilities |
|
|
Assets |
|
|
Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized gains on
available-for-sale securities |
|
¥ |
|
|
|
¥ |
2,686,560 |
|
|
¥ |
|
|
|
¥ |
487,242 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
4,145 |
|
Capital leases |
|
|
84,345 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
87,994 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
749 |
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued expenses |
|
|
161,902 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
301,322 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,563 |
|
|
|
|
|
Retirement and pension cost |
|
|
89,705 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
311,558 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,650 |
|
|
|
|
|
Stock issuance cost |
|
|
29,212 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,606 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
124 |
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for doubtful accounts |
|
|
16,333 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,874 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
92 |
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation |
|
|
25,070 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,362 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
156 |
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss on other investment |
|
|
127,115 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
632,365 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,379 |
|
|
|
|
|
Operating loss carryforward |
|
|
9,602,271 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,461,360 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
63,469 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
121,659 |
|
|
|
150,129 |
|
|
|
119,776 |
|
|
|
128,890 |
|
|
|
1,019 |
|
|
|
1,096 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
10,257,612 |
|
|
|
2,836,689 |
|
|
|
8,958,217 |
|
|
|
616,132 |
|
|
|
76,201 |
|
|
|
5,241 |
|
Valuation allowance |
|
|
(7,171,431 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,563,514 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(55,831 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
¥ |
3,086,181 |
|
|
¥ |
2,836,689 |
|
|
¥ |
2,394,703 |
|
|
¥ |
616,132 |
|
|
$ |
20,370 |
|
|
$ |
5,241 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of March 31, 2006 and 2007, the valuation allowance for deferred tax assets has been provided
at amounts which are not considered more likely than not to be realized. The net changes in the
valuation allowance for deferred tax assets were a decrease of ¥2,224,170 thousand, a decrease
of ¥1,244,326 thousand and a decrease of ¥607,917 thousand ($5,171 thousand) for the years ended
March 31, 2005, 2006 and 2007, respectively. |
F-24
|
|
As of March 31, 2007, IIJ and IIJ America had tax operating loss carryforwards of ¥17,083,252
thousand ($145,315 thousand) and $8,855 thousand, respectively. These loss carryforwards are
available to offset future taxable income, and will expire in the period ending March 31, 2012
in Japan and December 31, 2026 in the United States of America as follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ending |
|
|
|
|
|
Thousands of |
|
March 31 |
|
Thousands of Yen |
|
|
U.S. Dollars |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008 |
|
¥ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
9,314,732 |
|
|
|
79,234 |
|
2011 |
|
|
7,353,136 |
|
|
|
62,548 |
|
2012 and thereafter |
|
|
1,456,411 |
|
|
|
12,388 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
¥ |
18,124,279 |
|
|
$ |
154,170 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A reconciliation between the amount of reported income taxes and the amount of income taxes
computed using the normal statutory rate for each of the three years in the period ended March
31, 2007 is as follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thousands of |
|
|
|
Thousands of Yen |
|
|
U.S. Dollars |
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount computed by using
normal Japanese statutory
tax rate |
|
¥ |
1,290,888 |
|
|
¥ |
2,205,209 |
|
|
¥ |
2,069,962 |
|
|
$ |
17,608 |
|
Increase (decrease) in taxes
resulting from: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenses not deductible for
tax purpose |
|
|
34,820 |
|
|
|
38,653 |
|
|
|
60,340 |
|
|
|
513 |
|
Provision for (reversal of) reserve
for tax contingencies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
197,753 |
|
|
|
(108,782 |
) |
|
|
(925 |
) |
Inhabitant tax-per capital |
|
|
23,410 |
|
|
|
25,085 |
|
|
|
25,141 |
|
|
|
214 |
|
Realization of tax benefit of
operating loss carryforwards |
|
|
(1,426,755 |
) |
|
|
(439,256 |
) |
|
|
(2,163,531 |
) |
|
|
(18,404 |
) |
Other change in valuation allowance |
|
|
261,380 |
|
|
|
(1,933,379 |
) |
|
|
(717,049 |
) |
|
|
(6,099 |
) |
Expiration of operating loss
carryforwards |
|
|
|
|
|
|
149,750 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Othernet |
|
|
(83,873 |
) |
|
|
13,545 |
|
|
|
29,976 |
|
|
|
254 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax expense (benefit)
as reported |
|
¥ |
99,870 |
|
|
¥ |
257,360 |
|
|
¥ |
(803,943 |
) |
|
$ |
(6,839 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-25
10. |
|
RETIREMENT AND PENSION PLANS |
|
|
|
IIJ and certain subsidiaries have unfunded retirement benefit and noncontributory defined
benefit pension plans which together cover substantially all of their employees who are not
directors and also participate in a contributory multi-employer pension plan, the Japan
Computer Information Service Employees Pension Fund (the Multi-Employer Plan), covering
substantially all of their employees. |
|
|
|
Approximately 70 percent of the employees benefits from IIJs severance indemnity plan was
transferred in May 1997 to its newly established noncontributory defined benefits pension
plan. The following information regarding net periodic pension cost and accrued pension cost
also includes the 30 percent of severance benefits not transferred to the noncontributory
plan. Under the severance and pension plans, all of IIJs employees are entitled, upon
voluntary retirement with 15 years or more service, or upon mandatory retirement at age 60, to
a 10-year period of annuity payments (or lump-sum severance indemnities) based on the rate of
pay at the time of retirement, length of service and certain other factors. IIJs employees
who do not meet these conditions are entitled to lump-sum severance indemnities. |
|
|
|
As stipulated by the Japanese Welfare Pension Insurance Law, the Multi-Employer Plan is
composed of a substitutional portion of Japanese Pension Insurance and a multi-employers
portion of a contributory defined benefit pension plan. The benefits for the substitutional
portion are based on a standard remuneration schedule under the Welfare Pension Insurance Law
and the length of participation. The multi-employers portion of the benefits is based on the
employees length of service. However, assets contributed by an employer including IIJ are
not segregated in a separate account or restricted to provide benefits only to employees of
that employer. The net pension cost under the Multi-Employer Plan is recognized when
contributions become due. |
|
|
|
The Company adopted SFAS No.158 effective March 31, 2007. The following table provides a
breakdown of the incremental effect of applying this statement on individual line items in the
consolidated balance sheet at March 31, 2007: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thousands of Yen |
|
|
|
Before |
|
|
|
|
|
After |
|
|
|
Application of |
|
|
|
|
|
Application of |
|
|
|
SFAS 158 |
|
|
Adjustments |
|
|
SFAS 158 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets |
|
¥ |
3,224,576 |
|
|
¥ |
35,477 |
|
|
¥ |
3,260,053 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Assets |
|
¥ |
47,657,527 |
|
|
¥ |
35,477 |
|
|
¥ |
47,693,004 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other noncurrent liabilities |
|
¥ |
563,062 |
|
|
¥ |
1,556 |
|
|
¥ |
564,618 |
|
Accrued retirement
and pension costs-current |
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,428 |
|
|
|
8,428 |
|
Accrued retirement
and pension costs-noncurrent |
|
|
606,014 |
|
|
|
144,028 |
|
|
|
750,042 |
|
Minority interest |
|
|
821,986 |
|
|
|
(6,804 |
) |
|
|
815,182 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive
income |
|
|
1,061,440 |
|
|
|
(111,731 |
) |
|
|
949,709 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Liabilities and Shareholders
Equity |
|
¥ |
47,657,527 |
|
|
¥ |
35,477 |
|
|
¥ |
47,693,004 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-26
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thousands of U.S. Dollars |
|
|
|
Before |
|
|
|
|
|
After |
|
|
|
Application of |
|
|
|
|
|
Application of |
|
|
|
SFAS 158 |
|
|
Adjustments |
|
|
SFAS 158 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets |
|
$ |
27,429 |
|
|
$ |
302 |
|
|
$ |
27,731 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Assets |
|
$ |
405,389 |
|
|
$ |
302 |
|
|
$ |
405,691 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other noncurrent liabilities |
|
$ |
4,790 |
|
|
$ |
13 |
|
|
$ |
4,803 |
|
Accrued retirement
and pension costs-current |
|
|
|
|
|
|
72 |
|
|
|
72 |
|
Accrued retirement
and pension costs-noncurrent |
|
|
5,155 |
|
|
|
1,225 |
|
|
|
6,380 |
|
Minority interest |
|
|
6,992 |
|
|
|
(58 |
) |
|
|
6,934 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive
income |
|
|
9,028 |
|
|
|
(950 |
) |
|
|
8,078 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Liabilities and Shareholders
Equity |
|
$ |
405,389 |
|
|
$ |
302 |
|
|
$ |
405,691 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net periodic pension cost for the years ended March 31, 2005, 2006 and 2007 included the
following components: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thousands of |
|
|
|
Thousands of Yen |
|
|
U.S. Dollars |
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service cost |
|
¥ |
221,132 |
|
|
¥ |
240,765 |
|
|
¥ |
257,960 |
|
|
$ |
2,194 |
|
Interest cost |
|
|
14,944 |
|
|
|
20,524 |
|
|
|
26,589 |
|
|
|
226 |
|
Expected return on plan assets |
|
|
(13,129 |
) |
|
|
(16,736 |
) |
|
|
(26,942 |
) |
|
|
(228 |
) |
Amortization of transition
obligation |
|
|
402 |
|
|
|
402 |
|
|
|
402 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
Recognized net actuarial loss |
|
|
8,262 |
|
|
|
1,904 |
|
|
|
2,505 |
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net periodic pension cost |
|
¥ |
231,611 |
|
|
¥ |
246,859 |
|
|
¥ |
260,514 |
|
|
$ |
2,216 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The change in benefit obligation and plan assets for the years ended March 31, 2006 and 2007
and the amounts recognized in the consolidated balance sheets as of March 31, 2006 and 2007
are as follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thousands of |
|
|
|
Thousands of Yen |
|
|
U.S. Dollars |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in benefit obligation: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefit obligation at beginning of year |
|
¥ |
1,140,240 |
|
|
¥ |
1 ,329,452 |
|
|
$ |
11,309 |
|
Service cost |
|
|
240,765 |
|
|
|
257,960 |
|
|
|
2,194 |
|
Interest cost |
|
|
20,524 |
|
|
|
26,589 |
|
|
|
226 |
|
Actuarial loss (gain) |
|
|
(31,171 |
) |
|
|
45,597 |
|
|
|
388 |
|
Benefit paid |
|
|
(40,906 |
) |
|
|
(24,012 |
) |
|
|
(204 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefit obligation at end of year |
|
¥ |
1,329,452 |
|
|
¥ |
1,635,586 |
|
|
$ |
13,913 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in plan assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of plan assets at beginning
of year |
|
¥ |
796,946 |
|
|
¥ |
997,856 |
|
|
$ |
8,488 |
|
Actual return on plan assets |
|
|
68,185 |
|
|
|
32,233 |
|
|
|
274 |
|
Employer contribution |
|
|
155,191 |
|
|
|
173,160 |
|
|
|
1,473 |
|
Benefits paid |
|
|
(22,466 |
) |
|
|
(14,691 |
) |
|
|
(125 |
) |
Refund of surplus in plan assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(110,862 |
) |
|
|
(943 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of plan assets at end of year |
|
¥ |
997,856 |
|
|
¥ |
1,077,696 |
|
|
$ |
9,167 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funded status at end of year |
|
|
(331,596 |
) |
|
¥ |
(557,890 |
) |
|
$ |
(4,746 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrecognized actuarial loss |
|
|
111,009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrecognized transition obligation |
|
|
4,016 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net amount recognized |
|
¥ |
(216,571 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-27
|
|
On October 25, 2006, the surplus amount of ¥110,862 thousand in plan assets was refunded
as a result of the excess of actual return on plan assets compared with the expected return. |
|
|
|
Amounts recognized in the consolidated balance sheets as of
March 31, 2006 and 2007 consist of: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thousands of |
|
|
|
Thousands of Yen |
|
|
U.S. Dollars |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prepaid pension costs |
|
¥ |
3,891 |
|
|
¥ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Accrued retirement and pension costs-current |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8,428 |
) |
|
|
(72 |
) |
Accrued retirement and pension costs-non current |
|
|
(220,462 |
) |
|
|
(549,462 |
) |
|
|
(4,674 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net amount recognized |
|
¥ |
(216,571 |
) |
|
¥ |
(557,890 |
) |
|
$ |
(4,746 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accumulated benefit obligation for the Companys defined benefit pension plans as of March
31, 2006 and 2007 was ¥750,900 thousand and ¥937,733 thousand ($7,977 thousand), respectively. |
|
|
|
The aggregate projected benefit obligation and aggregate fair value of plan assets for plans
with projected benefit obligations in excess of plan assets were ¥1,329,452 thousand and
¥997,856 thousand at March 31, 2006 and ¥1,635,586 thousand ($13,913 thousand) and ¥1,077,696
thousand ($9,167 thousand) at March 31, 2007. The aggregate accumulated benefit obligation of
plans with no plan assets were ¥153,402 thousand and ¥220,779 thousand ($1,878 thousand) at
March 31, 2006 and 2007, respectively. |
|
|
|
Amounts recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income at March 31, 2007 consist of: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thousands of |
|
|
|
Thousands of Yen |
|
|
U.S. Dollars |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net actuarial loss |
|
¥ |
148,842 |
|
|
$ |
1,266 |
|
Obligation at transition |
|
|
3,614 |
|
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
¥ |
152,456 |
|
|
$ |
1,297 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The estimated net actuarial loss and obligation at transition for the defined benefit pension
plans that will be amortized from accumulated other comprehensive income into net periodic
pension cost in the fiscal year ending March 31, 2008 are ¥ 3,699 thousand ($31 thousand) and
¥ 402 thousand ($3 thousand), respectively. |
|
|
|
The Company uses a March 31 measurement date for all its plans. |
|
|
|
Actuarial assumptions as of March 31: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefit |
|
|
|
|
Obligations |
|
Net Periodic Costs |
|
|
2006 |
|
2007 |
|
2005 |
|
2006 |
|
2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discount rate |
|
|
2.0 |
% |
|
|
1.9 |
% |
|
|
1.6 |
% |
|
|
1.8 |
% |
|
|
2.0 |
% |
Expected long-term rate of return
on plan assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.0 |
|
|
|
2.1 |
|
|
|
2.7 |
|
Rate of increase in compensation |
|
|
3.4 |
|
|
|
3.5 |
|
|
|
3.25 |
|
|
|
3.4 |
|
|
|
3.4 |
|
F-28
|
|
The Company sets the discount rate assumption annually at March 31 to reflect the market yield
of Japanese Government Bonds matched against the average remaining service period of employees. |
|
|
|
The basis for determining the long-term rate of returns is a combination of historical returns
and prospective return assumptions derived from pension trust funds managing company. |
|
|
|
IIJs funding policies with respect to the noncontributory plan are generally to contribute
amounts considered tax deductible under applicable income tax regulations. Plan assets
including life insurance pooled investment portfolios consist of Japanese Government bonds,
other debt securities and marketable equity securities. Life insurance pooled investment portfolios are managed by an insurance company and guarantee a
minimum rate of return. |
|
|
|
The Companys investment strategy for the plan assets is to manage the assets in order to pay
retirement benefits to plan participants while minimizing cash contributions from the Company
over the life of the plans. This is accomplished by preserving capital through diversification
in equity and debt securities based on portfolio determined by the insurance company
forecasting macroeconomics in order to maximize long-term rate of return, while considering the
liquidity need of the plans. |
|
|
|
The projected allocation of the plan assets managed by the insurance company is developed in
consideration of the expected long-term investment returns for each category of the plan
assets. Approximately 63.0%, 35.0%, and 2.0% of the plan assets excluding pooled investment
portfolios will be allocated to debt securities, equity securities and other financial
instruments, respectively, to moderate the level of volatility in pension plan asset returns
and reduce risks. 50% of the employers contribution to the plan during the year ending March
31, 2008 will be allocated to life insurance pooled investment portfolios and other 50% will be
allocated to the forementioned investments. |
|
|
|
The Companys pension plan asset allocations as of March 31, 2006 and 2007 by asset category
are as follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006 |
|
2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset category: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity securities |
|
|
22.4 |
% |
|
|
(35.9 |
)% |
|
|
21.9 |
% |
|
|
(35.7 |
)% |
Debt securities |
|
|
38.8 |
|
|
|
(62.1 |
) |
|
|
38.1 |
|
|
|
(62.3 |
) |
Life insurance pooled investment portfolios |
|
|
37.6 |
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
38.8 |
|
|
|
( |
) |
Other |
|
|
1.2 |
|
|
|
(2.0 |
) |
|
|
1.2 |
|
|
|
(2.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
(100.0 |
)%* |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
(100.0 |
)%* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
The percentages in parentheses represent the Companys plan asset allocation excluding life
insurance pooled investment portfolios. |
|
|
The unrecognized net loss and the unrecognized net obligation at the date of initial
application are being amortized over 14 years and 21 years, respectively. |
|
|
|
Contributions due and paid during the years ended March 31, 2005, 2006 and 2007 under the
Multi-Employer Plan, including its substitutional portion, amounted to ¥466,543 thousand,
¥451,312 thousand and ¥ 522,269 thousand ($ 4,443 thousand), respectively. |
|
|
|
IIJ expects to contribute ¥173,159 thousand ($1,473 thousand) to its pension plan in the year
ending March 31, 2008. |
F-29
|
|
The following benefit payments, which reflect expected future service, as appropriate,
are expected to be paid. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ending |
|
|
|
|
Thousands of |
|
March 31 |
|
Thousands of yen |
|
|
U.S. Dollars |
|
2008 |
|
¥ |
45,670 |
|
|
$ |
388 |
|
2009 |
|
|
42,607 |
|
|
|
362 |
|
2010 |
|
|
50,068 |
|
|
|
426 |
|
2011 |
|
|
57,829 |
|
|
|
492 |
|
2012 |
|
|
64,179 |
|
|
|
546 |
|
2013 2017 |
|
|
410,823 |
|
|
|
3,495 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
¥ |
671,176 |
|
|
$ |
5,709 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The amount of retirement benefits for retiring directors and company auditors must be approved
by the shareholders. IIJ established a retirement plan for full-time company auditors in
March, 2006 and a retirement plan for full-time directors in March 2007. The Company recorded a
liability for the retirement benefits for full-time company auditors of ¥2,870 thousand and a liability for retirement benefit for
full-time directors and company auditors of ¥200,580 thousand ($1,706 thousand), which would
be required if they retire at March 31, 2006 and 2007, respectively. |
|
|
|
There were no other benefits approved or paid to retired directors and company auditors for
each of three years in the period ended March 31, 2007, except a benefit of ¥4,010 thousand
paid to a retired director in July 2005 and ¥3,000 thousand ($26 thousand) paid to a retired
auditor in July 2006, respectively. |
F-30
|
|
On and after May 1, 2006, Japanese companies are subject to a new corporation law (the
Corporation Law) which reformed and replaced the Commercial Code of Japan (the Code) with
various revisions that are, for the most part, applicable to events or transactions occurring
on or after May 1, 2006 and for the fiscal years ending on or after May 1, 2006. The
significant changes brought about by the Corporation Law that affect financial matters are
summarized below: |
|
|
(a) Dividends
Under the Corporation Law, companies can pay dividends at any time during the fiscal year in
addition to the year-end dividend in accordance with an approval of a shareholders meeting.
For companies that meet certain criteria such as: (1) having a Board of Directors, (2) having
independent auditors, (3) having a Board of Company Auditors, and (4) having a term of
service for directors prescribed as one year rather than two years as the normal term by its
articles of incorporation, the Board of Directors may declare dividends (except for dividends
in kind) if the company has prescribed so in its articles of incorporation. However, IIJ
cannot do so because it does not meet the criteria
(4) above.
The Corporation Law permits companies to distribute dividends in kind to shareholders subject
to a certain limitation and additional requirements. Semiannual interim dividends may also be
paid once a year upon resolution of the Board of Directors if the articles of incorporation of
the company so stipulate. The Corporation Law provides certain limitations on the amounts
available for dividends or the purchase of treasury stock. The limitation is defined as the
amount available for distribution to the shareholders, but the amount of net assets after
dividends must be maintained as at least ¥3 million. |
|
|
(b) Increases / decreases and transfer of common stock, reserve and surplus
The Corporation Law requires that an amount equal to 10% of dividends must be appropriated as
legal reserve (a component of retained earnings) or as additional paid-in capital (a component
of capital surplus) depending on the equity account charged upon the payment of such dividends
until the total of aggregate amount of legal reserve and additional paid-in capital equals 25%
of common stock. Under the Corporation Law, the total amount of additional paid-in capital and
legal reserve may be reversed without limitation. The Corporation Law also provides that
common stock, legal reserve, additional paid-in capital, and other capital surplus and
retained earnings can be transferred among the accounts under certain conditions upon
resolution of shareholders. |
|
|
(c) Treasury stock and treasury stock acquisition rights
The Corporation Law also provides for companies to purchase treasury stock and dispose of such
treasury stock by resolution of the Board of Directors. The amount of treasury stock purchased
cannot exceed the amount available for distribution to the shareholders which is determined by
specific formula. The Corporation Law also provides that companies can purchase both treasury stock acquisition
rights and treasury stock. |
|
|
At the 14th Ordinary General Shareholders Meeting held on June 28, 2006, IIJs
shareholders approved the reductions of additional paid-in capital of ¥21,980,395 thousand
($186,972 thousand) and common stock of ¥2,539,222 thousand ($21,599 thousand) to eliminate
the accumulated deficit for purpose of reporting under the Corporation Law in its
non-consolidated financial statements. The effective date was August 4, 2006. |
|
|
The amount of retained earnings available for dividends under the Corporation Law is based on
the amount of retained earnings recorded in IIJs general books of account with accepted
Japanese accounting practices. The adjustments included in the accompanying consolidated
financial statements for U.S.GAAP purposes but not recorded in the general books of account
have no effect on the determination of retained earnings available for dividends under the
Corporation Law. Retained earnings shown in IIJs general books of account amounted to
¥4,876,947 thousand ($41,485 thousand) at March 31, 2007. |
|
|
In December, 2005, IIJ completed a public offering of 12,500 new shares (equivalent to
5,000,000 ADSs) of common stock by a firm-commitment underwriting at an offering price of
¥534,022 (an issue value of ¥490,955) per share on the Mothers market of the Tokyo Stock
Exchange. The net proceeds to IIJ from the public offering, after deducting stock issuance
costs, were ¥6,030,064 thousand. Stock issuance costs of ¥106,873 thousand were deducted from
additional paid-in capital. |
|
|
In December, 2006, IIJs listing was transferred to the First Section of the Tokyo Stock
Exchange without the issuance of new shares. |
F-31
|
|
Stock Option PlansIn May 2000, IIJ granted 295 options to 34 directors and employees. The
options vested fully on April 8, 2002 and are exercisable for eight years from that date. In
August 2001, IIJ granted 395 options to 44 directors and employees. The options became fully
vested on June 28, 2003 and are exercisable for eight years from that date. No options are
available for additional grant as of March 31, 2007. No compensation expense has been
recognized in the consolidated statements of income pursuant to APB No. 25, because the
exercise price was greater than the market price on the dates of grant. |
|
|
In March 2000, subsidiary IIJ-Tech issued bonds with 2,000 detachable warrants in the amount
of ¥600,000 thousand. The bonds were repurchased in April 2000 and warrants to purchase the
subsidiarys 775 common shares at an exercise price of ¥300,000 per share based on fair market
value were immediately purchased by certain officers and employees of IIJ and the subsidiary.
One thousand warrants were purchased by IIJ. Warrants were exercisable upon issuance. On
March 29, 2006, 1,000 of the warrants of IIJ-Tech expired. The exercise price was revised to ¥250,326 ($2,131 thousand) per share as of
March 31, 2006, due to the effects of issuances of new shares during the year ended March 31,
2006. |
|
|
In March, 2007, 770 of the warrants were exercised at the above-mentioned exercise price. The
remaining 230 warrants expired on March 29, 2007. |
|
|
The following table summarizes the transactions of IIJs stock option plans for the year in
the period ended March 31, 2007: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thousands of Yen |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average |
|
|
|
Number of |
|
|
Number of |
|
|
Exercise Price per |
|
|
|
Options |
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Common Shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unexercised options outstandingMarch 31, 2006 |
|
|
530 |
|
|
|
2,650 |
|
|
¥ |
1,007 |
|
Options granted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options exercised |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options forfeited |
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
75 |
|
|
|
944 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unexercised options outstandingMarch 31, 2007 |
|
|
515 |
|
|
|
2,575 |
|
|
¥ |
1,009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Due to the effect of the stock split in October 2005, grantees of options can purchase
five shares by exercising one option. |
F-32
|
|
Summarized information about stock options outstanding as of March 31, 2007 is as follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding |
|
Exercisable |
|
|
|
|
Number of Shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise Price |
|
Underlying |
|
Remaining Life |
|
Number of Shares |
|
Total Intrinsic Value |
(Thousands of Yen) |
|
Options |
|
(in Years) |
|
Underlying Options |
|
(Thousands of Yen) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
¥2,163 |
|
|
|
950 |
|
|
|
3.0 |
|
|
|
950 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
334 |
|
|
|
1,625 |
|
|
|
4.3 |
|
|
|
1,625 |
|
|
¥ |
218,647 |
|
|
|
|
12. |
|
OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME |
|
|
The change in each component of other comprehensive income (loss) for the years ended March
31, 2005, 2006 and 2007 is as follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thousands of Yen |
|
|
|
Before Tax |
|
|
Tax (Expense) |
|
|
Net of Tax |
|
|
|
Amount |
|
|
or Benefit |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended March 31, 2005: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency translation adjustments |
|
¥ |
(25,858 |
) |
|
¥ |
|
|
|
¥ |
(25,858 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized holding gain (loss) on
securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount arising during the period |
|
|
4,989,951 |
|
|
|
(2,045,880 |
) |
|
|
2,944,071 |
|
Less: Reclassification adjustments for
gains included in net income |
|
|
(2,478,906 |
) |
|
|
1,016,351 |
|
|
|
(1,462,555 |
) |
Release in deferred tax asset valuation
allowance* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,029,529 |
|
|
|
1,029,529 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net unrealized holding gain (loss) during
the period |
|
|
2,511,045 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,511,045 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain on cash flow hedging derivative
instruments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount arising during the period |
|
|
(3,521 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,521 |
) |
Less: Reclassification adjustments for
losses included in net income |
|
|
13,010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net gain on cash flow hedging derivative
instruments |
|
|
9,489 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,489 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive income (loss) |
|
¥ |
2,494,676 |
|
|
¥ |
|
|
|
¥ |
2,494,676 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended March 31, 2006: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency translation adjustments |
|
¥ |
38,331 |
|
|
¥ |
|
|
|
¥ |
38,331 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized holding gain (loss) on
securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount arising during the period |
|
|
1,046,874 |
|
|
|
(429,218 |
) |
|
|
617,656 |
|
Less: Reclassification adjustments for
gains included in net income |
|
|
(3,227,203 |
) |
|
|
1,323,153 |
|
|
|
(1,904,050 |
) |
Increase in deferred tax asset valuation
allowance* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(893,935 |
) |
|
|
(893,935 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net unrealized holding gain (loss) during
the period |
|
|
(2,180,329 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,180,329 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain on cash flow hedging derivative
instruments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount arising during the period |
|
|
(4,541 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,541 |
) |
Less: Reclassification adjustments for
losses included in net income |
|
|
10,008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net gain on cash flow hedging derivative
instruments |
|
|
5,467 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,467 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive income (loss) |
|
¥ |
(2,136,531 |
) |
|
¥ |
|
|
|
¥ |
(2,136,531 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-33
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thousands of Yen |
|
|
|
Before Tax |
|
|
Tax (Expense) |
|
|
Net of Tax |
|
|
|
Amount |
|
|
or Benefit |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended March 31, 2007: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency translation adjustments |
|
¥ |
11,653 |
|
|
¥ |
|
|
|
¥ |
11,653 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized holding gain (loss) on
securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount arising during the period |
|
|
(2,277,976 |
) |
|
|
933,970 |
|
|
|
(1,344,006 |
) |
Less: Reclassification adjustments for
gains included in net income |
|
|
(3,229,899 |
) |
|
|
1,324,259 |
|
|
|
(1,905,640 |
) |
Increase in deferred tax asset valuation
allowance* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,258,229 |
) |
|
|
(2,258,229 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net unrealized holding gain (loss) during
the period |
|
|
(5,507,875 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,507,875 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain on cash flow hedging derivative
instruments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount arising during the period |
|
|
(708 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(708 |
) |
Less: Reclassification adjustments for
losses included in net income |
|
|
4,776 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,776 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net gain on cash flow hedging derivative
instruments |
|
|
4,068 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,068 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive income (loss) |
|
¥ |
(5,492,154 |
) |
|
¥ |
|
|
|
¥ |
(5,492,154 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thousands of U.S. Dollars |
|
|
|
Before Tax |
|
|
Tax (Expense) |
|
|
Net of Tax |
|
|
|
Amount |
|
|
or Benefit |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended March 31, 2007: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency translation adjustments |
|
$ |
99 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
99 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized holding gain (loss) on
securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount arising during the period |
|
|
(19,377 |
) |
|
|
7,945 |
|
|
|
(11,432 |
) |
Less: Reclassification adjustments for
gains included in net income |
|
|
(27,475 |
) |
|
|
11,265 |
|
|
|
(16,210 |
) |
Increase in deferred tax asset valuation
allowance* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(19,210 |
) |
|
|
(19,210 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net unrealized holding gain (loss) during
the period |
|
|
(46,852 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(46,852 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain on cash flow hedging derivative
instruments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount arising during the period |
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6 |
) |
Less: Reclassification adjustments for
losses included in net income |
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net gain on cash flow hedging derivative
instruments |
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive income (loss) |
|
$ |
(46,718 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(46,718 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
The release (increase) in the deferred tax asset valuation allowance has resulted from
unrealized gains
and (losses) on available-for-sale securities, respectively. |
F-34
|
|
The components of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) at March 31, 2006 and 2007 are
as follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thousands of |
|
|
|
Thousands of Yen |
|
|
U.S. Dollars |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency translation adjustments |
|
¥ |
5,036 |
|
|
¥ |
16,689 |
|
|
$ |
142 |
|
Unrealized holding gain on securities |
|
|
6,552,581 |
|
|
|
1,044,706 |
|
|
|
8,886 |
|
Gain (loss) on cash flow hedging
derivative instruments |
|
|
(4,023 |
) |
|
|
45 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
Pension liability adjustments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(111,731 |
) |
|
|
(950 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
¥ |
6,553,594 |
|
|
¥ |
949,709 |
|
|
$ |
8,078 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13. |
|
BASIC AND DILUTED NET INCOME PER COMMON SHARE |
|
|
Basic and diluted net income per common share computation for three years ended March 31,
2005, 2006 and 2007 is as follows. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thousands of |
|
|
|
Thousands of Yen |
|
|
U.S. Dollars |
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Numerator: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income-basic and diluted |
|
¥ |
2,906,269 |
|
|
¥ |
4,753,570 |
|
|
¥ |
5,409,713 |
|
|
$ |
46,017 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of shares |
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average common shares
outstanding-basic |
|
|
191,559 |
|
|
|
195,613 |
|
|
|
203,992 |
|
|
Dilutive effect of stock options |
|
|
|
|
|
|
342 |
|
|
|
252 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average common shares
outstanding-diluted |
|
|
191,559 |
|
|
|
195,955 |
|
|
|
204,244 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yen |
|
|
U.S. Dollars |
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic net income per common share |
|
¥ |
15,172 |
|
|
¥ |
24,301 |
|
|
¥ |
26,519 |
|
|
$ |
226 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted net income per common
share |
|
¥ |
15,172 |
|
|
¥ |
24,258 |
|
|
¥ |
26,487 |
|
|
$ |
225 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the year ended March 31, 2005, potentially dilutive shares have been excluded from
the computation of diluted net income because the exercise prices of the options were greater
than the average market price of the common shares and the effect of conversion of the
convertible notes would be antidilutive. |
|
|
For the years ended March 31, 2006 and 2007, potentially dilutive shares have been excluded
from the computation of diluted net income because the exercise prices of the options were
greater than the average market price of the common shares. |
|
|
Diluted net income per share does not include the effects of the following potential common shares: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended March 31 |
|
|
2005 |
|
2006 |
|
2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares issuable under stock options |
|
|
2,725 |
|
|
|
975 |
|
|
|
950 |
|
F-35
14. |
|
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENT LIABILITIES |
|
|
|
In December 2001, a class action complaint alleging violations of the federal securities
laws was filed against the Company, naming IIJ, certain of its officers and directors as
defendants, and underwriters of IIJs initial public offering. Similar complaints have been
filed against over 300 other issuers that have had initial public offerings since 1998 and
such actions have been included in a single coordinate proceeding in the Southern District of
New York. An amended complaint was filed on April 24, 2002 alleging, among other things, that
the underwriters of IIJs initial public offering violated the securities laws (i) by failing
to disclose in the offerings registration statement certain alleged compensation arrangements
entered into with the underwriters clients, such as undisclosed commissions or tie in
agreements to purchase stock in the after market, and (ii) by engaging in manipulative
practices to artificially inflate the price of IIJs stock in the after market subsequent to
the initial public offering. On July 15, 2002, the Company joined in an omnibus motion to
dismiss the amended complaint filed by the issuers and individuals named in the various
coordinated cases. On February 19, 2003, the Court ruled on the motions to dismiss. The
Court granted the Companys motion to dismiss the claims against it under Rule 10b-5
promulgated under the Exchange Act due to the insufficiency of the allegations against the
Company. The motions to dismiss the claims under Section 11 of the Securities Act were denied
as to virtually all of the defendants in the consolidated cases, including the Company. In
June 2003, the Company conditionally approved a proposed partial settlement with the
plaintiffs in this matter. IIJ, along with the settling issuer defendants, filed a motion
seeking the courts preliminary approval of the settlement. The settlement would have
provided, among other things, a release of the Company and of the individual officer and
director defendants for the alleged wrongful conduct in the Amended Complaint in exchange for
a guarantee from the Companys insurers regarding recovery from the underwriter defendants and
other non-monetary consideration from the Company. The plaintiffs have continued to litigate
against the underwriter defendants. The District Court directed that the litigation proceed
within a number of focus cases rather than in all of the 310 cases that have been
consolidated. The Companys case is not one of these focus cases. On October 13, 2004, the
district court certified the focus cases as class actions in the ongoing litigation. The
underwriter defendants appealed that ruling, and on December 5, 2006, the Court of Appeals for
the Second Circuit reversed the district courts class certification decision. On April 6,
2007, the Second Circuit denied plaintiffs petition for rehearing, and on May 18, 2007, the
Second Circuit denied the plaintiffs petition for rehearing en banc. In light of the Second
Circuit opinion, liaison counsel for all issuer defendants, including the Company, informed
the District Court that this settlement cannot be approved, because the defined settlement
class, like the litigation class, cannot be certified. The Company
cannot predict whether the Company
will be able to renegotiate a settlement that complies with the Second Circuits mandate. Due
to the inherent uncertainties of litigation, the Company cannot predict the ultimate outcome
of the matter. |
|
|
|
In addition to the foregoing, the Company is a party to other suits and claims that arise
in the normal course of business. The negative adverse outcome of such suits and claims would
not have a significant impact on the financial statements. |
|
|
|
On May 29, 2006, IIJ made an agreement for investing in funds which invest in unlisted stocks
mainly in the United States of America, with an investment advisory company. IIJ committed to
provide $5 million for the fund at its request in future several years. IIJ provided $608
thousand for the year ended March 31, 2007. On January 17, 2007, IIJ made another agreement
for investing in funds which invest in unlisted stocks mainly in Europe, Asia and Israel, with
an investment advisory company. IIJ committed to provide $5 million for the fund at its
request in future several years. IIJ provided $140 thousand for the year ended March 31, 2007. |
|
|
|
On March 29, 2007, IIJ made a contract with Panasonic Network Services Inc. to acquire 100% of
the shares of hi-ho, Inc., which provides internet service under the hi-ho brand and the
solution business to corporate customers. IIJ purchased the shares for ¥1.2 billion ($10
million) with a closing date of June 1, 2007 in the agreement. |
15. |
|
DERIVATIVE AND OTHER FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS |
|
|
|
Interest Rate Swap AgreementThe Company is exposed to changes in interest rates that are
associated with long-term bank borrowings. The Companys policy on managing the interest rate
risk is to hedge the exposure to variability in future cash flows of floating rate interest
payments on the long-term bank borrowings. In order to reduce cash flow risk exposures on
floating rate borrowings, the Company utilizes interest rate swap agreements to convert a
floating rate borrowing to a fixed rate borrowing. |
F-36
|
|
The Company is also exposed to credit-related losses in the event of non-performance by
counterparties to interest rate swaps, but it is not expected that any counterparties will fail to meet their
obligations, because counterparties are internationally recognized financial institutions. |
|
|
|
Changes in fair value of interest rate swaps designated as hedging instrument are reported in
accumulated other comprehensive income during the years ended March 31, 2005, 2006 and 2007.
These amounts subsequently are reclassified into interest expense as a yield adjustment in the
same period in which the hedged bank borrowings affect earnings. The term, notional amount
and repricing date of interest rate swaps exactly match those of the long-term borrowings.
The swap terms are at the market, so they have zero value at inception. Thus, there was no
ineffectiveness recognized in earnings for the years ended March 31, 2005, 2006 and 2007.
For the years ended March 31, 2005, 2006 and 2007, net derivative losses of ¥13,010 thousand,
¥10,008 thousand and ¥ 4,776 thousand ($41 thousand), respectively, were reclassified to
interest expense. |
|
|
|
¥45 thousand ($0.4 thousand) of accumulated other comprehensive gain related to the interest
rate swaps are expected to be reclassified as an adjustment to interest expense as a yield
adjustment of the hedged bank borrowings within the next 12 months. |
|
|
|
Fair ValueIn the normal course of business, the Company invests in financial assets and
incurs financial liabilities. To estimate the fair value of those financial assets,
liabilities and derivatives, the Company used quoted market prices to the extent that they
were available. Where a quoted market price is not available, the Company estimates fair
value using primarily the discounted cash flow method. For certain financial assets and
liabilities, such as trade receivables and trade payables, which are expected to be collected
and settled within one year, the Company assumed that the carrying amount approximates fair
value due to their short maturities. For guarantee deposits, which are fully refunded at the
end of lease contracts, the remaining noncancellable lease terms are principally within two
years and the Company assumed that the carrying amount approximates fair value. Investment for
which it is not practicable to estimate fair value primarily consists of investments in a
number of unaffiliated and unlisted smaller sized companies and the estimate of their fair
values cannot be made without incurring excessive costs. Refundable insurance policies are
carried at cash surrender value. The carrying amounts or notional amounts and fair value of
financial instruments are summarized below: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thousands of |
|
|
Thousands of Yen |
|
U.S. Dollars |
|
|
2006 |
|
2007 |
|
2007 |
|
|
Carrying |
|
Fair |
|
Carrying |
|
Fair |
|
Carrying |
|
Fair |
|
|
Amount |
|
Value |
|
Amount |
|
Value |
|
Amount |
|
Value |
Other
investments
for which it is: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Practicable to
estimate
fair value |
|
¥ |
6,775,388 |
|
|
¥ |
6,775,388 |
|
|
¥ |
1,297,694 |
|
|
¥ |
1,297,694 |
|
|
$ |
11,039 |
|
|
$ |
11,039 |
|
Not practicable |
|
|
1,245,317 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,544,047 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,134 |
|
|
|
|
|
Noncurrent
refundable
insurance
policies
(other assets) |
|
|
82,252 |
|
|
|
82,252 |
|
|
|
115,555 |
|
|
|
115,555 |
|
|
|
983 |
|
|
|
983 |
|
Long-term
borrowings and
installment
payable,
including
current
portion |
|
|
2,279,963 |
|
|
|
2,279,963 |
|
|
|
290,000 |
|
|
|
290,000 |
|
|
|
2,467 |
|
|
|
2,467 |
|
Interest rate
swap contracts* |
|
|
(4,023 |
) |
|
|
(4,023 |
) |
|
|
45 |
|
|
|
45 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Notional amount was ¥1,150,000 thousand and ¥250,000 thousand ($2,127 thousand) as of March 31, 2006 and 2007, respectively. |
F-37
|
|
Cash at March 31, 2006 and 2007 includes U.S. dollar denominated current bank deposits of
¥442,169 thousand and ¥372,934 thousand ($3,172 thousand), respectively. |
16. |
|
ADVERTISING EXPENSES |
|
|
|
Advertising expenses incurred during the years ended March 31, 2005, 2006 and 2007 related
primarily to advertisements in magazines, journals and newspapers and amounted to ¥151,226
thousand, ¥223,696 thousand and ¥337,768 thousand ($2,873 thousand), respectively. |
17. |
|
RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS |
|
|
|
NTT and its subsidiary owned 29.7 percent of IIJs outstanding common shares as of March 31,
2007. |
|
|
|
The Company entered into a number of different types of transactions with NTT and its
subsidiaries including purchases of wireline telecommunication services for the Companys
offices. For the Companys connectivity and value added services, the Company purchases
international and domestic backbone services, local access lines and rental rack space in data
centers from NTT and its subsidiaries. The Company sells to NTT and its subsidiaries its
services including OEM services, system integration services and monitoring services for their
data centers. |
|
|
|
The amounts of balances as of March 31, 2006 and 2007 and transactions of the Company with NTT
and its subsidiaries for the each of the three years in the period ended March 31, 2007, are
summarized as follows. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thousands of |
|
|
Thousands of Yen |
|
U.S. Dollars |
|
|
2005 |
|
2006 |
|
2007 |
|
2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable |
|
¥ |
|
|
|
¥ |
366,648 |
|
|
¥ |
318,069 |
|
|
$ |
2,706 |
|
Accounts payable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
710,322 |
|
|
|
664,938 |
|
|
|
5,656 |
|
Revenues |
|
|
1,413,379 |
|
|
|
1,394,791 |
|
|
|
1,308,843 |
|
|
|
11,133 |
|
Costs and expenses |
|
|
7,672,480 |
|
|
|
8,075,542 |
|
|
|
7,725,572 |
|
|
|
65,716 |
|
|
|
As for equity method investees, refer to Note 4,
INVESTMENTS IN AND ADVANCES TO EQUITY METHOD INVESTEES. |
18. |
|
SUBSEQUENT EVENTS |
|
|
|
On April 5, 2007, the boards of directors of IIJ, IIJ-Tech and Net Care resolved that IIJ
would make these two consolidated subsidiaries 100% owned through share exchanges and on May, 11, 2007, each of
the companies, including IIJ-FS, a wholly owned subsidiary of IIJ-Tech, became a wholly owned subsidiary of IIJ under an agreement for the share exchanges. In this connection, IIJ issued new 2,178
shares of common stock to the shareholders of these subsidiaries upon the provision of the exchanges of the shares in the
agreement. |
|
|
|
Prior to the share exchanges, IIJ purchased the shares of IIJ-Tech and Net Care from their minority
shareholders for ¥1,635 million ($14 million) and ¥340 million ($3 million), respectively, resulting
to increases in IIJs interests in IIJ-Tech and Net Care to 95.2% and 92.5%, respectively, as of April 5, 2007. |
|
|
|
On June 1, 2007, IIJ purchased all shares of hi-ho, Inc. (hi-ho) for ¥1,200 million ($10 million), which was
a wholly owned subsidiary of Panasonic Network Services Inc. (PNS) and is operating the ISP business
provided by PNS under the hi-ho service brand and the solution business to corporate customers, based on
a resolution of the board of directors of IIJ made on March 29, 2007. |
|
|
|
On June 26, 2007, IIJs shareholders approved the payment of cash dividend to shareholders of record at
March 31, 2007 of ¥1,500 ($13) per share or in the aggregate amount of ¥306,450 thousand ($2,607 thousand). |
* * * * * *
F-38