Edgar Filing: REALTY INCOME CORP

Table of Contents

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, DC 20549

FORM 10-Q

x Quarterly report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2013, or

o Transition report pursuant to section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

Commission File Number 1-13374

REALTY INCOME CORPORATION

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

	Maryland		33-0580106
	(State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization)		(IRS Employer Identification Number)

600 La Terraza Boulevard, Escondido, California 92025-3873

(Address of Principal Executive Offices)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (760) 741-2111

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes x No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer x Accelerated filer o Non-accelerated filer o Smaller reporting company o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No x

There were 196,168,085 shares of common stock outstanding as of July 17, 2013.

Table of Contents

REALTY INCOME CORPORATION

Form 10-Q

June 30, 2013

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PART I.	FINANCIAL INFORMATION	Page

Item 1:	Financial Statements

	Consolidated Balance Sheets	3
	Consolidated Statements of Income	4
	Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows	5
	Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements	6

Item 2:	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

	Forward-Looking Statements	25
	The Company	26
	Recent Developments	30
	Liquidity and Capital Resources	34
	Results of Operations	40
	Funds from Operations Available to Common Stockholders (FFO) And Normalized Funds from Operations Available to Common Stockholders (Normalized FFO)	46
	Adjusted Funds from Operations Available to Common Stockholders (AFFO)	48
	Property Portfolio Information	50
	Impact of Inflation	57
	Impact of Recent Accounting Pronouncements	57
	Other Information	57

Item 3:	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	58

Item 4:	Controls and Procedures	59

PART II.	OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1:	Legal Proceedings	60

Item 1A:	Risk Factors	60

Item 2:	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	60

Item 6:	Exhibits	60

SIGNATURE		64

Table of Contents

PART I.	FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1.	Financial Statements

REALTY INCOME CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012

(dollars in thousands, except per share data)

	2013		2012
ASSETS	(unaudited)
Real estate, at cost:
Land	$	2,539,628	$	1,999,820
Buildings and improvements	6,672,354		3,920,865
Total real estate, at cost	9,211,982		5,920,685
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization	(998,079)		(897,767)
Net real estate held for investment	8,213,903		5,022,918
Real estate held for sale, net	16,808		19,219
Net real estate	8,230,711		5,042,137
Cash and cash equivalents	22,575		5,248
Accounts receivable, net	27,507		21,659
Acquired lease intangible assets, net	972,049		242,125
Goodwill	15,834		16,945
Other assets, net	146,857		115,249
Total assets	$	9,415,533	$	5,443,363

LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
Distributions payable	$	39,280	$	23,745
Accounts payable and accrued expenses	77,411		70,426
Acquired lease intangible liabilities, net	116,381		26,471
Other liabilities	29,266		26,059
Lines of credit payable	701,000		158,000
Mortgages payable, net	827,109		175,868
Term loan	70,000		-
Notes payable	2,450,000		2,550,000
Total liabilities	4,310,447		3,030,569

Commitments and contingencies

Stockholders’ equity:
Preferred stock and paid in capital, par value $0.01 per share, 69,900,000 shares authorized and 25,150,000 shares issued and outstanding as of June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012	609,363		609,363
Common stock and paid in capital, par value $0.01 per share, 370,100,000 shares authorized, 196,265,884 shares issued and outstanding as of June 30, 2013 and 133,452,411 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2012	5,329,715		2,572,092
Distributions in excess of net income	(870,199)		(768,661)
Total stockholders’ equity	5,068,879		2,412,794
Noncontrolling interests	36,207		-
Total equity	5,105,086		2,412,794
Total liabilities and equity	$	9,415,533	$	5,443,363

The accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements are an integral part of these statements.

Table of Contents

REALTY INCOME CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME

For the three and six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012

(dollars in thousands, except per share data)(unaudited)

	Three Months Ended				Six Months Ended
	June 30,		June 30,		June 30,		June 30,
	2013		2012		2013		2012
REVENUE
Rental	$	182,354	$	112,528	$	352,104	$	224,020
Other	1,965		605		3,356		858
Total revenue	184,319		113,133		355,460		224,878

EXPENSES
Depreciation and amortization	77,698		34,742		147,280		69,093
Interest	39,100		28,806		80,567		57,758
General and administrative	12,075		9,273		23,688		18,440
Property	3,283		1,746		6,899		3,668
Income taxes	722		405		1,393		810
Merger-related costs	605		-		12,635		-
Total expenses	133,483		74,972		272,462		149,769
Income from continuing operations	50,836		38,161		82,998		75,109
Income from discontinued operations	3,911		5,246		43,562		7,562
Net income	54,747		43,407		126,560		82,671
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests	(77)		-		(86)		-
Net income attributable to the Company	54,670		43,407		126,474		82,671
Preferred stock dividends	(10,482)		(10,457)		(20,965)		(19,953)
Excess of redemption value over carrying value of preferred shares redeemed (see note 10)	-		-		-		(3,696)
Net income available to common stockholders	$	44,188	$	32,950	$	105,509	$	59,022

Amounts available to common stockholders per common share:
Income from continuing operations:
Basic	$	0.21	$	0.21	$	0.34	$	0.39
Diluted	$	0.21	$	0.21	$	0.34	$	0.39
Net income:
Basic	$	0.23	$	0.25	$	0.57	$	0.44
Diluted	$	0.23	$	0.25	$	0.57	$	0.44
Weighted average common shares outstanding:
Basic	195,574,014		132,592,939		183,714,191		132,643,698
Diluted	196,099,610		132,828,540		184,165,700		132,785,213

The accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements are an integral part of these statements.

Table of Contents

REALTY INCOME CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

For the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012

(dollars in thousands)(unaudited)

	2013		2012
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Net income	$	126,560	$	82,671
Adjustments to net income:
Depreciation and amortization	147,280		69,093
Income from discontinued operations	(43,562)		(7,562)
Amortization of share-based compensation	7,498		5,550
Amortization of net premiums on mortgages payable	(4,441)		(168)
Other non-cash adjustments	-		(301)
Cash provided by discontinued operations	2,777		5,489
Change in assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable and other assets	(2,424)		1,820
Accounts payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities	(12,255)		(659)
Net cash provided by operating activities	221,433		155,933
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES
Acquisition of investment properties, net of cash received	(748,374)		(219,554)
Improvements to real estate, including leasing costs	(3,294)		(2,405)
Proceeds from sales of real estate:
Continuing operations	8		-
Discontinued operations	76,333		18,549
Loans receivable	(9,584)		(3,795)
Restricted escrow deposits for Section 1031 tax-deferred exchanges, pending acquisitions and other deposits	(14,448)		(6,449)
Net cash used in investing activities	(699,359)		(213,654)
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Cash distributions to common stockholders	(191,669)		(116,552)
Cash dividends to preferred stockholders	(20,965)		(18,480)
Borrowings on line of credit	1,533,200		377,400
Payments on line of credit	(990,200)		(431,200)
Principal payment on notes payable	(100,000)		-
Principal payments on mortgages	(2,674)		(10,952)
Proceeds from term loan	70,000		-
Proceeds from common stock offering, net	755,136		-
Proceeds from preferred stock offerings, net	-		395,377
Redemption of preferred stock	-		(127,500)
Repayment of line of credit, previously belonging to ARCT	(317,207)		-
Repayment of term loan, previously belonging to ARCT	(235,000)		-
Distributions to noncontrolling interests	(287)		-
Debt issuance costs	(511)		(7,058)
Proceeds from dividend reinvestment and stock purchase plan, net	1,912		1,548
Other items	(6,482)		(2,963)
Net cash provided by financing activities	495,253		59,620
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents	17,327		1,899
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period	5,248		4,165
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period	$	22,575	$	6,064

For supplemental disclosures, see note 18.

The accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements are an integral part of these statements.

Table of Contents

REALTY INCOME CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

June 30, 2013

(unaudited)

1. Management Statement

The consolidated financial statements of Realty Income Corporation (“Realty Income”, the “Company”, “we”, “our” or “us”) were prepared from our books and records without audit and include all adjustments (consisting of only normal recurring accruals) necessary to present a fair statement of results for the interim periods presented. Readers of this quarterly report should refer to our audited consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2012, which are included in our 2012 Annual Report on Form 10-K, as certain disclosures that would substantially duplicate those contained in the audited financial statements have not been included in this report.

We report, in discontinued operations, the results of operations of properties that have either been sold or are classified as held for sale. Additionally, due to materiality thresholds, we have separately reported acquired lease intangible assets and liabilities, which were previously reported as a portion of other assets, net and other liabilities, net, respectively, on our consolidated balance sheets. As a result, certain of the 2012 balances have been reclassified to conform to the 2013 presentation.

At June 30, 2013, we owned 3,681 properties, located in 49 states and Puerto Rico, containing over 58.3 million leasable square feet, along with four properties owned by our wholly-owned taxable REIT subsidiary, Crest Net Lease, Inc., or Crest.

2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies and Procedures

A. The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Realty Income and other entities for which we make operating and financial decisions (i.e., control), after elimination of all material intercompany balances and transactions. We consolidate entities that we control and record a noncontrolling interest for the portion that we do not own. Noncontrolling interest that was created or assumed as part of a business combination was recognized at fair value as of the date of the transaction (see notes 4 and 12). We have no unconsolidated investments.

B. We have elected to be taxed as a real estate investment trust, or REIT, under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, or the Code. We believe we have qualified and continue to qualify as a REIT. Under the REIT operating structure, we are permitted to deduct dividends paid to our stockholders in determining our taxable income. Assuming our dividends equal or exceed our net income, we generally will not be required to pay federal corporate income taxes on such income. Accordingly, no provision has been made for federal income taxes in the accompanying consolidated financial statements, except for federal income taxes of our taxable REIT subsidiaries, which are included in discontinued operations. The income taxes recorded on our consolidated statements of income represent amounts paid by Realty Income for city and state income and franchise taxes.

C. We recognize an allowance for doubtful accounts relating to accounts receivable for amounts deemed uncollectible. We consider tenant specific issues, such as financial stability and ability to pay rent, when determining collectability of accounts receivable and appropriate allowances to record. The allowance for doubtful accounts was $399,000 at June 30, 2013 and $448,000 at December 31, 2012.

D. We assign a portion of goodwill to our property sales, which results in a reduction of the carrying amount of our goodwill. In order to allocate goodwill to the carrying amount of properties that we sell, we utilize a relative fair value approach based on the original methodology for assigning goodwill. As we sell properties, our goodwill will likely continue to gradually decrease over time.

Table of Contents

E. Under the amendments issued in conjunction with ASU No. 2011-08, Intangibles – Goodwill and Other (Topic 350), an entity, through an assessment of qualitative factors, is not required to calculate the estimated fair value of a reporting unit, in connection with two-step goodwill impairment test, unless the entity determines that it is more likely than not that its fair value is less than its carrying amount. Despite the issuance of ASU No. 2011-08, we elected to continue testing goodwill for impairment during the second quarter of each year as well as when events or circumstances occur, indicating that our goodwill might be impaired. During our tests for impairment of goodwill during the second quarters of 2013 and 2012, we determined that the estimated fair values of our reporting units exceeded their carrying values. We did not have an impairment on our existing goodwill in 2013 and 2012.

3. Supplemental Detail for Certain Components of Consolidated Balance Sheets

	June 30,		December 31,
A. Other assets, net, consist of the following (dollars in thousands) at:	2013		2012
Loans receivable	$	48,886	$	35,126
Deferred financing costs on notes payable, net	27,923		29,687
Restricted escrow deposits	14,448		1,805
Notes receivable issued in connection with property sales	19,250		19,300
Prepaid expenses	13,017		9,489
Note receivable issued in connection with acquisition	8,780		8,780
Credit facility origination costs, net	7,031		8,188
Impounds related to mortgages payable	4,415		-
Deferred financing costs on mortgages payable, net	1,488		1,541
Corporate assets, net	1,157		909
Deferred financing costs on term loan, net	264		-
Other items	198		424
	$	146,857	$	115,249

B. Acquired lease intangible assets, net, consist of the following	June 30,		December 31,
(dollars in thousands) at:	2013		2012
Acquired in-place leases	$	886,587	$	235,914
Accumulated amortization of acquired in-place leases	(62,927)		(29,601)
Acquired above-market leases	158,629		40,389
Accumulated amortization of acquired above-market leases	(10,240)		(4,577)
	$	972,049	$	242,125

C. Distributions payable consist of the following declared	June 30,		December 31,
distributions (dollars in thousands) at:	2013		2012
Common stock distributions	$	35,630	$	20,251
Preferred stock dividends	3,494		3,494
Noncontrolling interests distributions	156		-
	$	39,280	$	23,745

D. Accounts payable and accrued expenses consist of the	June 30,		December 31,
following (dollars in thousands) at:	2013		2012
Note interest payable	$	41,790	$	40,061
Accrued costs on properties under development	9,430		8,595
Mortgage interest payable	2,963		648
Other items	23,228		21,122
	$	77,411	$	70,426

Table of Contents

E. Acquired lease intangible liabilities, net, consist of the	June 30,		December 31,
following (dollars in thousands) at:	2013		2012
Acquired below-market leases	$	123,141	$	28,975
Accumulated amortization of acquired below-market leases	(6,760)		(2,504)
	$	116,381	$	26,471

F. Other liabilities consist of the following (dollars in thousands)	June 30,		December 31,
at:	2013		2012
Rent received in advance	$	16,809	$	20,929
Preferred units issued upon acquisition of ARCT	6,750		-
Security deposits	5,707		5,130
	$	29,266	$	26,059

4. American Realty Capital Trust, Inc. (ARCT)

A. Acquisition

On January 22, 2013, we completed our acquisition of ARCT for approximately $3.2 billion. Each outstanding share of ARCT common stock was converted into the right to receive a combination of: (i) $0.35 in cash and (ii) 0.2874 shares of our common stock, resulting in the issuance of a total of 45,573,144 shares of our common stock to ARCT shareholders, valued at a per share amount of $44.04, which was the closing price of our common stock on January 22, 2013. In connection with the closing of the ARCT acquisition, we repaid and terminated the amounts then outstanding of approximately $552.9 million under ARCT’s revolving credit facility and term loan.

The acquisition of ARCT is expected to provide immediate and long-term benefits to Realty Income, including growth in the size of our real estate portfolio, diversification of industries and property type, accretion to net earnings, increase in the percentage of investment grade tenants, and larger size and scope of our company, which increases competitive advantages in the net-lease marketplace.

With this acquisition, we added 515 properties to our portfolio. The preliminary allocation of the purchase price reflects aggregate consideration of approximately $2.1 billion, as calculated below (in thousands):

Consideration associated with equity issued (1)	$	2,027,753
Cash consideration paid to previous owners of ARCT	56,216
Total preliminary purchase consideration	$	2,083,969

(1) Includes the value associated with the issuance of the Tau Operating Partnership units discussed in 4.C. below.

We have accounted for the ARCT acquisition in accordance with ASC 805, Business Combinations, and are in the process of completing our allocation of the purchase price for this acquisition, which we expect to finalize later this year. The following table summarizes our preliminary purchase price allocation, which represents our current best estimate of acquisition date fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed (in thousands):

Table of Contents

Assets:
Real estate	$	2,621,842
Acquired lease intangible assets	611,672
Cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, and other assets, net	42,334
Total Assets	3,275,848

Liabilities:
Lines of credit payable	317,207
Term loan	235,000
Mortgages payable	538,960
Acquired lease intangible liabilities	76,043
Accounts payable, accrued expenses, and other liabilities, net	24,669
Total Liabilities	1,191,879

Estimated fair value of net assets acquired	$	2,083,969

The final allocation of the purchase price will be based on our assessment of the fair value of the acquired assets and liabilities using both Level 2 and 3 inputs. The final purchase price allocation may be significantly different from the estimates above.

Investments in Real Estate Properties. We will estimate the fair value generally by applying an income approach methodology using both direct capitalization and discounted cash flow analysis. Key assumptions include capitalization and discount rates. Our valuations will be based, in part, on valuations prepared by an independent valuation firm.

Acquired Lease Intangibles. The fair value of in-place leases will be calculated based upon our estimate of the costs to obtain tenants in each of the applicable markets. An asset or liability will be recognized for acquired leases with favorable or unfavorable rents based on our estimate of current market rents in each of the applicable markets. Our valuations of the intangible assets will be based, in part, on valuations prepared by an independent valuation firm.

Debt. The fair value of debt will be estimated based on contractual future cash flows discounted using borrowing spreads and market interest rates that would be available to us for the issuance of debt with similar terms and remaining maturities.

B. Transaction Costs

In connection with our acquisition of ARCT, we expect to incur total merger-related transaction costs of approximately $21 million, which includes, but are not limited to, advisor fees, legal fees, accounting fees, printing fees and transfer taxes. During the first six months of 2013, we incurred $12.6 million of the estimated $21 million of total merger-related transaction costs, which are included in income from continuing operations. In 2012, we incurred $7.9 million of these total merger-related transaction costs.

C. Noncontrolling interests and preferred units

Consideration associated with equity issued includes the value of issued common and preferred partnership units issued in Tau Operating Partnership, L.P., or Tau Operating Partnership, the consolidated subsidiary which owns properties acquired through the ARCT acquisition. Since the date of acquisition, Realty Income and its subsidiaries hold a 99.3% interest in the Tau Operating Partnership.

Table of Contents

The common units do not have voting rights, are entitled to monthly distributions equal to the amount paid to common stockholders of Realty Income, and are redeemable in cash or Realty Income common stock at our option and at a conversion ratio of one to one. Noncontrolling interests with redemption provisions that permit the issuer to settle in either cash or common stock at the option of the issuer were evaluated to determine whether temporary or permanent equity classification on the balance sheet was appropriate. We evaluated this guidance and determined that the common units meet the requirements to qualify for presentation as permanent equity. See note 12 for the change in the carrying value of these common units from January 22, 2013 through June 30, 2013.

The Tau Operating Partnership preferred units have also been recorded at fair value as of the date of acquisition. Since they are redeemable at a fixed price on a determinable date, we have classified them in other liabilities, net on our consolidated balance sheet. Payments on these preferred units are made monthly at a rate of 2% per annum and are included in interest expense. As of June 30, 2013, the preferred units have a carrying value of $6.75 million.

D. Litigation

There have been no material developments to our legal proceedings disclosure previously reported under Part I, Item 3 “Legal Proceedings” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012.

5. Investments in Real Estate

We acquire the land, buildings and improvements that are necessary for the successful operations of commercial enterprises.

A. Acquisitions during the First Six Months of 2013 and 2012

During the first six months of 2013, we invested $866.5 million in 206 new properties and properties under development or expansion (excluding ARCT), with an estimated initial weighted average contractual lease rate of 7.0%. The 206 new properties and properties under development or expansion are located in 35 states, will contain over 5.1 million leasable square feet, and are 100% leased with a weighted average lease term of 13.8 years. The tenants of the new properties acquired operate in 17 industries: aerospace, automotive collision services, automotive parts, convenience stores, crafts and novelties, dollar stores, drug stores, equipment services, food processing, general merchandise, health and fitness, health care, restaurants-casual dining, restaurants-quick service, sporting goods, transportation services, and wholesale clubs.

During the first six months of 2013, we also completed our acquisition of ARCT for $3.2 billion, which added 515 properties to our real estate portfolio. The 515 properties are located in 44 states and Puerto Rico, contain over 16.0 million leasable square feet, and are 100% leased with a weighted average lease term of 12.2 years. The 69 tenants occupying the 515 properties acquired operate in 28 industries: aerospace, apparel stores, automotive parts, automotive tire services, automotive services, consumer appliances, consumer goods, convenience stores, crafts and novelties, dollar stores, drug stores, financial services, food processing, general merchandise, government services, grocery stores, health care, home furnishings, home improvement, jewelry, other manufacturing, pet supplies and services, restaurants – casual dining, restaurants – quick service, shoe stores, telecommunications, transportation services, and wholesale clubs. We recorded ARCT merger-related transaction costs of $12.6 million in the first six months of 2013.

Our combined total investment in real estate assets, including the ARCT acquisition, during the first six months of 2013, was $4.0 billion. None of our investments during the first six months of 2013 caused any one tenant to be 10% or more of our total assets at June 30, 2013.

Table of Contents

Our aggregate acquisitions, during the first six months of 2013, were allocated as follows: $553.4 million to land, $2.78 billion to buildings and improvements, $771.3 million to intangible assets, $13.7 million to other assets, net, and $93.5 million to intangible and assumed liabilities. We also recorded mortgage premiums of $28.4 million associated with the mortgages acquired. There was no contingent consideration associated with these acquisitions.

The properties acquired during the first six months of 2013 generated total revenues of $86.0 million and income from continuing operations of $16.0 million.

The purchase price allocation for $3.9 billion of the $4.0 billion invested by us in the first six months of 2013 is based on a preliminary measurement of fair value that is subject to change. The allocation for these properties represents our current best estimate of fair value and we expect to finalize the valuations and complete the purchase price allocations in 2013. In the first six months of 2013, we finalized the purchase price allocations for $106.4 million invested in the second half of 2012 and $93.0 million invested in the first six months of 2013. There were no material changes to our consolidated income statement for the first six months of 2013 as a result of these purchase price allocation adjustments.

The estimated initial weighted average contractual lease rate is computed as estimated contractual net operating income (in a net-leased property that is equal to the aggregate base rent) for the first full year of each lease, divided by the total cost of the property. Since it is possible that a tenant could default on the payment of contractual rent, we cannot provide assurance that the actual return on the funds invested will remain at the percentages listed above.

In the case of a property under development, the initial weighted average contractual lease rate is computed as follows: estimated net operating income (which is calculated by multiplying a predetermined capitalization rate by our projected total investment in the property, including land, construction and capitalized interest) for the first full year of each lease, divided by the total cost of the property. Of the $4.0 billion we invested in the first six months of 2013, $18.8 million was invested in 19 properties under development or expansion with an estimated initial weighted average contractual lease rate of 8.6%.

During the first six months of 2012, we invested $221.5 million in 156 new properties and properties under development or expansion, with an estimated initial weighted average contractual lease rate of 7.2%. These 156 new properties and properties under development or expansion, are located in 29 states, contain over 1.4 million leasable square feet, and are 100% leased with a weighted average lease term of 14.6 years. The tenants of these properties operate in seven industries: automotive collision services, crafts and novelties, drug stores, general merchandise, health and fitness, restaurants – quick service, and transportation services.

B. Acquisition Transaction Costs

Acquisition transaction costs of $818,000 were recorded to general and administrative expense on our consolidated statement of income for the six months ended June 30, 2013. Acquisition transaction costs of $634,000 were recorded to general and administrative expense on our consolidated statement of income for the six months ended June 30, 2012.

C. Investments in Existing Properties

During the first six months of 2013, we capitalized costs of $3.3 million on existing properties in our portfolio, consisting of $774,000 for re-leasing costs and $2.5 million for building and tenant improvements. In comparison, during the first six months of 2012, we capitalized costs of $2.4 million on existing properties in our portfolio, consisting of $698,000 for re-leasing costs and $1.7 million for building and tenant improvements.

Table of Contents

D. Properties with Existing Leases

Of the $4.0 billion we invested in the first six months of 2013, approximately $3.97 billion was used to acquire 712 properties with existing leases. Associated with these 712 properties, we recorded $650.4 million as the intangible value of the in-place leases, $120.9 million as the intangible value of above-market leases and $93.5 million as the intangible value of below-market leases. The value of the in-place and above-market leases is recorded to acquired lease intangible assets, net on our consolidated balance sheet, and the value of the below-market leases is recorded to acquired lease intangible liabilities, net on our consolidated balance sheet. The values recorded to a majority of these intangible values, during the first six months of 2013, are based on a preliminary measurement of fair value that is subject to change.

The value of the in-place leases is amortized as depreciation and amortization expense. The amounts amortized to expense for all of our in-place leases, for the first six months of 2013 and 2012, were $33.3 million and $6.7 million, respectively.

The value of the above-market and below-market leases is amortized as rental revenue on our consolidated statements of income. All of these amounts are amortized over the term of the respective leases. The amounts amortized as a net decrease to rental revenue for capitalized above-market and below-market leases for the first six months of 2013 and 2012 were $1.4 million and $964,000, respectively. If a lease were to be terminated prior to its stated expiration, all unamortized amounts relating to that lease would be recorded to revenue or expense as appropriate.

The following table presents the impact during the next five years and thereafter related to the net decrease to rental revenue from the amortization of the acquired above-market and below-market lease intangibles and the increase to amortization expense from the amortization of the in-place lease intangibles for properties owned at June 30, 2013 (in thousands):

		Net decrease		Increase to
		to rental		amortization
		revenue		expense
2013	$	(1,763)	$	40,811
2014		(3,602)		81,148
2015		(3,546)		80,271
2016		(3,535)		79,992
2017		(3,500)		78,707
Thereafter		(16,061)		462,731
Totals	$	(32,007)	$	823,660

E. Pro Forma Information

The following pro forma total revenue and income from continuing operations, for the first six months of 2013 and 2012, assumes all of our property acquisitions for the first six months of 2013 occurred on January 1, 2012. This pro forma supplemental information does not include: (1) the impact of any synergies or lower borrowing costs that we have or may achieve as a result of the acquisitions, or any strategies that management has or may consider in order to continue to efficiently manage our operations, and (2) ARCT’s historical operational costs, including general and administrative costs and property expenses. Additionally, this information does not purport to be indicative of what our operating results would have been, had the acquisitions occurred on January 1, 2012, and may not be indicative of future operating results. For purposes of calculating these pro-forma amounts, we assumed that merger-related costs of approximately $12.1 million, which represent the estimated merger-related costs incurred after consummation of our ARCT acquisition, occurred on January 1, 2012. Other than the item specified above, no material, non-recurring pro-forma adjustments were included in the calculation of this information.

Table of Contents

			Income from
	Total		continuing
Dollars in millions	revenue		operations
Supplemental pro forma for the six months ended June 30, 2013	$	388.2	$	105.4
Supplemental pro forma for the six months ended June 30, 2012	$	341.6	$	83.7

6. Credit Facility

At June 30, 2013, credit facility origination costs of $7.0 million are included in other assets, net, on our consolidated balance sheet. These costs are being amortized over the remaining term of our current $1 billion credit facility.

At June 30, 2013, we had a borrowing capacity of $299.0 million available on our credit facility (subject to customary conditions to borrowing) and an outstanding balance of $701.0 million, as compared to an outstanding balance of $158.0 million at December 31, 2012. In July 2013, we issued $750.0 million of 4.65% senior unsecured notes due 2023, and the proceeds were used to repay all outstanding borrowings on the credit facility on July 16, 2013.

The weighted average interest rate on outstanding borrowings under our credit facility was 1.3% during the first six months of 2013 and 1.9% during the first six months of 2012. At June 30, 2013, the effective interest rate was 1.3%. Our current and prior credit facilities are and were subject to various leverage and interest coverage ratio limitations. At June 30, 2013, we remain in compliance with these covenants.

7. Mortgages Payable

During the first six months of 2013, we assumed mortgages totaling $630.0 million, excluding net premiums. The mortgages are secured by the properties on which the debt was placed. Of the $630.0 million of mortgages assumed during the first six months of 2013, approximately $608.8 million is considered non-recourse with limited customary exceptions for items such as bankruptcy, misrepresentation, fraud, misapplication of payments, environmental liabilities, failure to pay taxes, insurance premiums, liens on the property and uninsured losses. Approximately $6.6 million has full recourse to Realty Income, and the remaining $14.6 million of the assumed debt is not guaranteed by Realty Income. We expect to pay off the mortgages as soon as prepayment penalties have declined to a level that will make it economically feasible to do so. We intend to continue to primarily identify property acquisitions that are free from mortgage indebtedness.

During the first six months of 2013, aggregate net premiums totaling $28.4 million were recorded upon assumption of the mortgages for above-market interest rates, as compared to net premiums totaling $10.0 million recorded in 2012. Amortization of these net premiums is recorded as a reduction to interest expense over the remaining term of the respective mortgages, using a method that approximates the effective-interest method.

These mortgages contain customary covenants, such as limiting our ability to further mortgage each applicable property or to discontinue insurance coverage, without the prior consent of the lender. At June 30, 2013, we remain in compliance with these covenants.

Table of Contents

As a result of assuming mortgages payable in the first six months of 2013 and in all of 2012, we incurred deferred financing costs of $211,000 and $1.1 million, respectively, which were classified as part of other assets, net, on our consolidated balance sheets. The balance of these deferred financing costs was $1.5 million at June 30, 2013 and at December 31, 2012, which is being amortized over the remaining term of each mortgage.

The following is a summary of all our mortgages payable as of June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively (dollars in thousands):

		Weighted	Weighted	Weighted
		Average	Average	Average
		Stated	Effective	Remaining	Remaining		Unamortized		Mortgage
	Number of	Interest	Interest	Years Until	Principal		Premium		Payable
As Of	Properties(1)	Rate(2)	Rate(3)	Maturity	Balance		Balance		Balance
6/30/13	229	5.4%	3.9%	4.5	$	793,217	$	33,892	$	827,109
12/31/12	11	5.8%	4.4%	4.8	$	165,927	$	9,941	$	175,868

(1) At June 30, 2013, there were 51 mortgages on 229 properties, while at December 31, 2012, there were 13 mortgages on 11 properties. The mortgages require monthly payments, with principal payments due at maturity. The mortgages are at fixed interest rates, except for: (1) a $23.6 million mortgage maturing on June 10, 2015 with a floating variable interest rate calculated as the sum of the current one month LIBOR plus 4.5%, not to exceed an all-in interest rate of 5.5%, (2) a $8.3 million mortgage maturing on September 3, 2021, with a floating interest rate calculated as the sum of the current one month LIBOR plus 2.4%, and (3) a $32.4 million mortgage maturing on April 10, 2017, which is fixed at 5.07% through December 28, 2015, but is reset to the greater of 4.0%, or the two-year swap rate plus 2.75% thereafter. As part of the $8.3 million mortgage payable assumed in 2012, we also acquired an interest rate swap which essentially fixes the interest rate on this mortgage payable at 6.0%. As part of the $32.4 million mortgage payable assumed in 2013, we have the opportunity to prepay the mortgage at par on December 28, 2015, prior to the variable interest rate reset. As part of two mortgages totaling $8.8 million and maturing on December 28, 2013, we also acquired an $8.8 million note receivable, upon which we receive interest income at a stated rate of 8.1% through December 28, 2013.

(2) Stated interest rates ranged from 2.5% to 8.3% at June 30, 2013, while stated interest rates ranged from 2.6% to 8.3% at December 31, 2012.

(3) Effective interest rates ranged from 2.4% to 9.3% at June 30, 2013, while effective interest rates ranged from 2.7% to 8.3% at December 31, 2012.

The following table summarizes the maturity of mortgages payable, excluding net premiums of $33.9 million, as of June 30, 2013 (dollars in millions):

Year of
Maturity
2013	$	24.3
2014	64.4
2015	125.5
2016	248.4
2017	133.0
Thereafter	197.6
Totals	$	793.2

8. Term Loan

In January 2013, in conjunction with our acquisition of ARCT, we entered into a $70 million senior unsecured term loan maturing January 21, 2018. Borrowing under the term loan bears interest at the current one month LIBOR, plus 1.2%. In conjunction with this term loan, we also acquired an interest rate swap, which essentially fixes our per annum interest rate on the term loan at 2.15%. As a result of entering into our term loan, we incurred deferred financing costs of $288,000, which are being amortized over the remaining term of the term loan. The net balance of these deferred financing costs was $264,000, which are classified as part of other assets, net, on our consolidated balance sheet at June 30, 2013.

Table of Contents

9. Notes Payable

A. General

Our senior unsecured notes and bonds consist of the following, sorted by maturity date (dollars in millions):

	June 30,		December 31,
	2013		2012
5.375% notes, issued in March 2003 and due in March 2013	$	-	$	100
5.5% notes, issued in November 2003 and due in November 2015	150		150
5.95% notes, issued in September 2006 and due in September 2016	275		275
5.375% notes, issued in September 2005 and due in September 2017	175		175
2.0% notes, issued in October 2012 and due in January 2018	350		350
6.75% notes, issued in September 2007 and due in August 2019	550		550
5.75% notes, issued in June 2010 and due in January 2021	250		250
3.25% notes, issued in October 2012 and due in October 2022	450		450
5.875% bonds, $100 issued in March 2005 and $150 issued in June 2011, both due in March 2035	250		250
	$	2,450	$	2,550

As of June 30, 2013, the weighted average interest rate of our notes and bonds payable was 4.97% and the weighted average remaining years until maturity was 7.5 years.

B. Note Repayment

On their maturity date in March 2013, using proceeds from our March 2013 common stock offering and our credit line, we repaid the $100 million of outstanding 5.375% notes we issued in March 2003 at a price equal to 100% of the principal amount, plus accrued and unpaid interest.

C. Note Issuance

See note 23 which discusses the notes issued in July 2013.

10. Issuance and Redemption of Preferred Stock

A. In February 2012, we issued 14.95 million shares of our 6.625% Monthly Income Class F Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock at a price of $25.00 per share, including 1.95 million shares purchased by the underwriters upon the exercise of their overallotment option. In April 2012, we issued an additional 1.4 million shares of our Class F preferred stock at a price of $25.2863 per share. After aggregate underwriting discounts and other offering costs of $13.8 million, we received net proceeds of $395.4 million for the February and April offerings combined, of which $127.5 million was used to redeem all of our outstanding 7.375% Monthly Income Class D Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock and the balance was used to repay a portion of the borrowings under our credit facility. Beginning February 15, 2017, the Class F preferred shares are redeemable, at our option, for $25 per share. The initial dividend of $0.1702257 per share was paid on March 15, 2012 and covered 37 days. Thereafter, dividends of $0.138021 per share are paid monthly in arrears on the Class F preferred stock.

B. We redeemed all of the 5.1 million shares of our 7.375% Monthly Income Class D Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock in March 2012 for $25.00 per share, plus accrued dividends. We incurred a charge of $3.7 million for the first six months of 2012, representing the Class D preferred stock original issuance costs that we paid in 2004.

Table of Contents

11. Issuance of Common Stock

In March 2013, we issued 17,250,000 shares of common stock at a price of $45.90 per share, including 2,250,000 shares purchased by the underwriters upon the exercise of their overallotment option. After underwriting discounts and other offering costs of $36.6 million, the net proceeds of $755.1 million were used to redeem our 5.375% notes in March 2013 and repay borrowings under our acquisition credit facility, which were used to fund property acquisitions, including our acquisition of ARCT.

In connection with our January 2013 acquisition of ARCT, as described in note 4, we issued a total of 45,573,144 shares of our common stock to ARCT shareholders and we received 208,709 shares of our common stock that were previously held by ARCT. The closing price per share of our common stock on the date of the ARCT acquisition was $44.04. The total value of the 45,573,144 common shares was approximately $2 billion.

12. Noncontrolling Interests

In June 2013, we completed the acquisition of a portfolio of properties by issuing units in a newly formed entity, Realty Income, L.P. The units issued as consideration for the acquisition represent a 2.2% ownership in Realty Income, L.P. at June 30, 2013. Realty Income holds the remaining 97.8% interests in this entity, and consolidates the entity.

The Realty Income, L.P. units do not have voting rights, are entitled to monthly distributions equal to the amount paid to common stockholders of Realty Income, and are redeemable in cash or Realty Income common stock, at our option, and at a conversion ratio of one to one, subject to certain exceptions. Noncontrolling interests with redemption provisions that permit the issuer to settle in either cash or common stock at the option of the issuer were evaluated to determine whether temporary or permanent equity classification on the balance sheet was appropriate. We evaluated this guidance and determined that the units meet the requirements to qualify for presentation as permanent equity.

The following table represents the change in the carrying value of all noncontrolling interests, including Tau Operating Partnership units which are discussed in note 4, through June 30, 2013 (dollars in thousands):

	Tau Operating			Realty Income, L.P.
	Partnership units(1)			units(2)			Total
Fair value of units issued	$	13,962		$	22,601		$	36,563
Distributions	(345		)	(97		)	(442		)
Allocation of net income	75			11			86
Carrying value at June 30, 2013	$	13,692		$	22,515		$	36,207

(1) Tau Operating partnership units issued on January 22, 2013.

(2) Realty Income, L.P. units issued on June 27, 2013.

13. Fair Value of Financial Assets and Liabilities

Fair value is defined as the price that would be received from the sale of an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. The disclosure for assets and liabilities measured at fair value requires allocation to a three-level valuation hierarchy. This valuation hierarchy is based upon the transparency of inputs to the valuation of an asset or liability as of the measurement date. Categorization within this hierarchy is based upon the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement.

Table of Contents

We believe that the carrying values reflected on our consolidated balance sheets reasonably approximate the fair values for cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, escrow deposits, loans receivable, lines of credit payable, term loan and all other liabilities, due to their short-term nature or interest rates and terms that are consistent with market, except for our notes receivable issued in connection with property sales or acquired in connection with an acquisition, mortgages payable and our senior notes and bonds payable, which are disclosed below (dollars in millions):

	Carrying value per		Estimated fair
At June 30, 2013	balance sheet		value
Notes receivable issued in connection with property sales	$	19.2	$	20.3
Note receivable issued in connection with an acquisition	8.8		8.8
Mortgages payable assumed in connection with acquisitions	827.1		824.5
Notes payable	2,450.0		2,595.4

	Carrying value per		Estimated fair
At December 31, 2012	balance sheet		value
Notes receivable issued in connection with property sales	$	19.3	$	20.5
Note receivable issued in connection with an acquisition	8.8		8.8
Mortgages payable assumed in connection with acquisitions	175.9		176.7
Notes payable	2,550.0		2,827.1

The estimated fair values of our notes receivable, issued in connection with property sales or acquired in connection with an acquisition, and our mortgages payable have been calculated by discounting the future cash flows using an interest rate based upon the current 5-year, 7-year or 10-year Treasury yield curve, plus an applicable credit-adjusted spread. Because this methodology includes unobservable inputs that reflect our own internal assumptions and calculations, the measurement of estimated fair values, related to our notes receivable and mortgages payable, is categorized as level 3 on the three-level valuation hierarchy.

The estimated fair value of our notes payable is based upon indicative market prices and recent trading activity of our senior notes and bonds payable. Because this methodology includes inputs that are less observable by the public and are not necessarily reflected in active markets, the measurement of the estimated fair values, related to our notes payable, is categorized as level 2 on the three-level valuation hierarchy.

14. Gain on Sales of Investment Properties

During the second quarter of 2013, we sold 17 investment properties for $23.7 million, which resulted in a gain of $5.7 million. During the first six months of 2013, we sold 34 investment properties for $83.7 million, which resulted in a gain of $44.3 million. The results of operations for these properties have been reclassified as discontinued operations.

In comparison, during the second quarter of 2012, we sold 14 investment properties for $15.0 million, which resulted in a gain of $3.4 million. During the first six months of 2012, we sold 19 investment properties for $18.6 million, which resulted in a gain of $4.0 million. The results of operations for these properties have been reclassified as discontinued operations.

Table of Contents

15. Discontinued Operations

We review long-lived assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. A provision is made for impairment if estimated future operating cash flows (undiscounted and without interest charges) plus estimated disposition proceeds (undiscounted) are less than the current book value of the property. Key factors that we estimate in this analysis include projected rental rates, estimated holding periods, capital expenditures and property sales capitalization rates. If a property is classified as held for sale, it is carried at the lower of carrying cost or estimated fair value, less estimated cost to sell.

For the second quarter of 2013, we recorded total provisions for impairment of $2.5 million on one sold property and two properties classified as held for sale in the following industries: one in the automotive service industry, one in the grocery store industry, and one in our other industries. For the first six months of 2013, we recorded total provisions for impairment of $3.0 million on seven sold properties and two properties classified as held for sale in the following industries: one in the automotive parts industry, two in the automotive service industry, two in the child care industry, one in the grocery store industry, one in the pet supplies and services industry, one in the restaurant-casual dining industry, and one in our other industries. These provisions for impairment are included in income from discontinued operations on our consolidated statement of income for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013. For the first six months of 2012, we did not record any provisions for impairment.

Operations from 18 investment properties classified as held for sale at June 30, 2013, plus properties previously sold, are reported as discontinued operations. Their respective results of operations have been reclassified as income from discontinued operations on our consolidated statements of income. We do not depreciate properties that are classified as held for sale.

No debt was assumed by buyers of our investment properties, or repaid as a result of our investment property sales, and we do not allocate interest expense to discontinued operations related to real estate held for investment. We allocate interest expense related to borrowings specifically attributable to Crest. The interest expense amounts allocated to Crest are included in income from discontinued operations.

The following is a summary of income from discontinued operations on our consolidated statements of income (dollars in thousands):

	Three months ended						Six months ended
	June 30,						June 30,
Income from discontinued operations	2013			2012			2013			2012
Gain on sales of investment properties	$	5,744		$	3,354		$	44,304		$	3,965
Rental revenue	623			3,029			2,668			6,204
Other revenue	7			6			17			21
Depreciation and amortization	(196		)	(896		)	(520		)	(1,848		)
Property expenses	(36		)	(443		)	(491		)	(1,105		)
Provisions for impairment	(2,496		)	-			(2,952		)	-
Crest’s income from discontinued operations	265			196			536			325
Income from discontinued operations	$	3,911		$	5,246		$	43,562		$	7,562
Per common share, basic and diluted(1)	$	0.02		$	0.04		$	0.24		$	0.06

(1) The per share amounts for income from discontinued operations above and the income from continuing operations and net income reported on the consolidated statements of income have each been calculated independently.

Table of Contents

16. Distributions Paid and Payable

A. Common Stock

We pay monthly dividends to our common stockholders. The following is a summary of the monthly dividends paid per common share for the first six months of 2013 and 2012:

Month	2013		2012
January	$	0.1517500	$	0.1455000
February	0.1809167		0.1455000
March	0.1809167		0.1455000
April	0.1812292		0.1458125
May	0.1812292		0.1458125
June	0.1812292		0.1458125
Total	$	1.0572710	$	0.8739375

At June 30, 2013, a distribution of $0.1815417 per common share was payable and was paid in July 2013.

B. Preferred Stock

In March 2012, we redeemed all of our 5.1 million shares of 7.375% Monthly Income Class D Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock, which were issued in 2004. During the first three months of 2012, we paid dividends to holders of our Class D preferred stock totaling $0.3841147 per share, or $2.0 million.

In 2006, we issued 8.8 million shares of our 6.75% Monthly Income Class E Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock for $25.00 per share. As of December 7, 2011, the Class E preferred shares were redeemable, at our option, for $25.00 per share. During each of the first six months of 2013 and 2012, we paid six monthly dividends to holders of our Class E preferred stock totaling $0.84375 per share, or $7.4 million, and at June 30, 2013, a monthly dividend of $0.140625 per share was payable and was paid in July 2013.

In February 2012, we issued 14.95 million shares of 6.625% Monthly Income Class F Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock at a price of $25.00 per share. In April 2012, we issued an additional 1.4 million shares of our Class F preferred stock at a price of $25.2863 per share. Beginning February 15, 2017, shares of our Class F preferred shares are redeemable, at our option, for $25.00 per share, plus any accrued and unpaid dividends. During the first six months of 2013, we paid six monthly dividends to holders of our Class F preferred stock totaling $0.828126 per share, or $13.5 million, and during the first six months of 2012, we paid four monthly dividends to holders of our Class F preferred stock totaling $0.5842887, or $9.1 million. The initial March 2012 dividend on our Class F preferred stock covered 37 days. At June 30, 2013, a monthly dividend of $0.138021 per share was payable and was paid in July 2013.

We are current in our obligations to pay dividends on our Class E and Class F preferred stock.

C. Tau Operating Partnership Common Units

As part of our acquisition of ARCT, we issued 317,022 common partnership units of Tau Operating Partnership. These common units are entitled to monthly distributions equivalent to the per common share amounts paid to the common stockholders of Realty Income. For the first six months of 2013, we paid five monthly distributions to holders of these common units totaling $0.905521 per unit, or $287,000, and at June 30, 2013, a monthly distribution of $0.1815417 per common unit was payable and was paid in July 2013.

Table of Contents

D. Realty Income, L.P. units

In June 2013, we issued 534,546 common partnership units of Realty Income, L.P. These common units are entitled to monthly distributions equivalent to the per common share amount paid to the common stockholders of Realty Income. The first distribution of $0.1815417 per common unit was paid in July 2013.

17. Net Income Per Common Share

Basic net income per common share is computed by dividing net income available to common stockholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during each period. Diluted net income per common share is computed by dividing net income available to common stockholders for the period by the weighted average number of common shares that would have been outstanding assuming the issuance of common shares for all potentially dilutive common shares outstanding during the reporting period.

The following is a reconciliation of the denominator of the basic net income per common share computation to the denominator of the diluted net income per common share computation:

	Three months ended		Six months ended
	June 30,		June 30,
	2013	2012	2013	2012
Weighted average shares used for the basic net income per share computation	195,574,014	132,592,939	183,714,191	132,643,698
Weighted average of Tau Operating Partnership common units convertible to common shares	317,022	-	280,240	-
Weighted average of Realty Income, L.P. common units convertible to common shares	23,497	-	11,813	-
Incremental shares from share-based compensation	185,077	235,601	159,456	141,515
Adjusted weighted average shares used for diluted net income per share computation	196,099,610	132,828,540	184,165,700	132,785,213
Unvested shares from share-based compensation that were anti-dilutive	16,600	16,200	16,600	16,400

18. Supplemental Disclosures of Cash Flow Information

Cash paid for interest was $78.6 million in the first six months of 2013 and $55.7 million in the first six months of 2012.

Interest capitalized to properties under development was $369,000 in the first six months of 2013 and $277,000 in the first six months of 2012.

Cash paid for income taxes was $1.5 million in the first six months of 2013 and $818,000 in the first six months of 2012.

The following non-cash investing and financing activities are included in the accompanying consolidated financial statements:

A. Share-based compensation expense was $7.5 million for the first six months of 2013 and was $5.6 million for the first six months of 2012.

B. See note 15 for a discussion of impairments in discontinued operations, for the first six months of 2013.

Table of Contents

C. During the first six months of 2013, the following components were acquired in connection with our acquisition of ARCT: (1) real estate investments and related intangible assets of $3.2 billion, (2) other assets of $21.0 million, (3) lines of credit payable of $317.2 million, (4) a term loan for $235.0 million, (5) mortgages payable of $539.0 million, (6) intangible liabilities of $76.0 million, (7) other liabilities of $24.7 million, and (8) noncontrolling interests of $14.0 million.

D. During the first six months of 2013, we acquired mortgages payable to third-party lenders of $113.7 million and recorded $5.7 million of net premiums related to property acquisitions.

E. During the first six months of 2013, we acquired $55.9 million of real estate through the assumption of a $32.4 million mortgage payable, the issuance of 534,546 units by Realty Income, L.P. and cash of $1.0 million.

F. During the first six months of 2013, we acquired real estate for $7.4 million via exchanges of our properties.

G. Accrued costs on properties under development resulted in an increase in buildings and improvements and accounts payable of $836,000 at June 30, 2013, and $1.9 million at June 30, 2012.

19. Segment Information

We evaluate performance and make resource allocation decisions on an industry by industry basis. For financial reporting purposes, we have grouped our tenants into 47 activity segments. All of the properties are incorporated into one of the applicable segments. Because almost all of our leases require the tenant to pay operating expenses, revenue is the only component of segment profit and loss we measure.

Table of Contents

The following tables set forth certain information regarding the properties owned by us, classified according to the business of the respective tenants, as of June 30, 2013 (dollars in thousands):

	June 30,		December 31,
Assets, as of:	2013		2012
Segment net real estate:
Automotive service	$	111,551	$	96,830
Automotive tire services	258,926		184,601
Beverages	308,417		310,555
Child care	59,132		61,747
Convenience stores	776,180		670,103
Dollar stores	594,380		450,566
Drug stores	895,975		159,482
Financial services	222,135		25,166
Food processing	129,611		102,964
Grocery stores	294,513		219,216
Health and fitness	404,322		330,503
Health care	203,812		4,562
Restaurants-casual dining	502,600		450,574
Restaurants-quick service	326,321		250,692
Theaters	374,524		381,123
Transportation services	599,079		130,203
Wholesale club	460,002		308,202
30 other non-reportable segments	1,709,231		905,048
Total segment net real estate	8,230,711		5,042,137

Intangible assets:
Automotive service	3,769		-
Automotive tire services	17,972		470
Beverages	3,184		3,313
Convenience stores	24,936		-
Dollar stores	45,702		12,475
Drug stores	183,107		14,885
Financial services	48,127		4,443
Food processing	27,142		21,785
Grocery stores	23,563		5,650
Health and fitness	33,981		15,056
Health care	44,346		-
Restaurants-casual dining	14,655		-
Restaurants-quick service	21,708		3,464
Theaters	26,036		28,475
Transportation services	128,050		27,997
Wholesale club	36,282		-
Other non-reportable segments	289,489		104,112

Goodwill:
Automotive service	470		471
Automotive tire services	865		865
Child care	5,190		5,276
Convenience stores	2,050		2,064
Restaurants-casual dining	2,382		2,430
Restaurants-quick service	1,166		1,176
Other non-reportable segments	3,711		4,663
Other corporate assets	196,939		142,156
Total assets	$	9,415,533	$	5,443,363

Table of Contents

	Three months ended				Six months ended
	June 30,				June 30,
Revenue	2013		2012		2013		2012
Segment rental revenue:
Automotive service	$	4,031	$	3,713	$	7,976	$	7,482
Automotive tire services	6,980		5,672		13,648		11,321
Beverages	6,178		6,105		12,357		12,210
Child care	5,411		5,221		10,663		10,500
Convenience stores	20,824		19,273		41,067		38,476
Dollar stores	10,191		1,091		19,785		1,127
Drug stores	12,593		4,092		22,795		8,124
Financial services	4,091		699		7,373		1,382
Food processing	2,830		1,350		5,511		2,765
Grocery stores	5,801		4,436		11,315		8,872
Health and fitness	10,859		7,950		21,162		15,922
Health care	3,994		71		7,084		140
Restaurants-casual dining	9,895		8,317		19,341		16,895
Restaurants-quick service	7,868		6,576		15,988		13,449
Theaters	11,538		11,127		23,046		22,259
Transportation services	10,766		2,918		19,643		5,627
Wholesale club	6,104		3,025		12,074		6,051
30 other non-reportable segments	42,400		20,892		81,276		41,418
Total rental revenue	182,354		112,528		352,104		224,020
Other revenue	1,965		605		3,356		858
Total revenue	$	184,319	$	113,133	$	355,460	$	224,878

20. Common Stock Incentive Plan

In 2012, our Board of Directors adopted and stockholders approved the Realty Income Corporation 2012 Incentive Award Plan, or the 2012 Plan, to enable us to motivate, attract and retain the services of directors, employees and consultants considered essential to our long-term success. The 2012 Plan offers our directors, employees and consultants an opportunity to own stock in Realty Income or rights that will reflect our growth, development and financial success. Under the terms of the 2012 Plan, the aggregate number of shares of our common stock subject to options, restricted stock, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock units and other awards, will be no more than 3,985,734 shares. The 2012 Plan has a term of 10 years from the date it was adopted by the Board of Directors.

The amount of share-based compensation costs recognized in general and administrative expense on our consolidated statements of income was $3.7 million during the second quarter of 2013, $2.6 million during the second quarter of 2012, $7.5 million during the first six months of 2013, and $5.6 million during the first six months of 2012.

Table of Contents

The following table summarizes our common stock grant activity under the 2012 Plan and the previous 2003 Incentive Award Plan of Realty Income Corporation, or the 2003 Plan. Our common stock grants vest over periods ranging from immediately to 10 years.

	For the six months ended				For the year ended
	June 30, 2013				December 31, 2012
			Weighted				Weighted
	Number of		average		Number of		average
	shares		price(1)		shares		price(1)
Outstanding nonvested shares, beginning of year	895,550		$	19.94	925,526		$	20.21
Shares granted	272,787		42.89		261,811		35.06
Shares vested	(324,625	)	32.14		(290,877	)	27.47
Shares forfeited	(2,143	)	35.84		(910	)	31.67
Outstanding nonvested shares, end of each period	841,569		$	26.12	895,550		$	19.94

(1) Grant date fair value.

During the first six months of 2013, we issued 272,787 shares of common stock under the 2012 Plan. These shares vest over the following service periods: 25,662 vested immediately, 62,989 vest over a service period of one year, 12,000 vest over a service period of three years, and 172,136 vest over a service period of five years.

As of June 30, 2013, the remaining unamortized share-based compensation expense totaled $22.0 million, which is being amortized on a straight-line basis over the service period of each applicable award.

Due to a historically low turnover rate, we do not estimate a forfeiture rate for our nonvested shares. Accordingly, unexpected forfeitures will lower share-based compensation expense during the applicable period. Under the terms of our 2012 and 2003 Plans, we pay non-refundable dividends to the holders of our nonvested shares. Applicable accounting guidance requires that the dividends paid to holders of these nonvested shares be charged as compensation expense to the extent that they relate to nonvested shares that do not or are not expected to vest. However, since we do not estimate forfeitures given our historical trends, we did not record any compensation expense related to dividends paid in the first six months of 2013 or 2012.

21. Dividend Reinvestment and Stock Purchase Plan

In March 2011, we established a Dividend Reinvestment and Stock Purchase Plan, or the DSPP, to provide our common stockholders, as well as new investors, with a convenient and economical method of purchasing our common stock and reinvesting their distributions. The DSPP also allows our current stockholders to buy additional shares of common stock by reinvesting all or a portion of their distributions. The DSPP authorizes up to 6,000,000 common shares to be issued. During the first six months of 2013, we issued 44,549 shares and raised approximately $2.0 million under the DSPP. During the first six months of 2012, we issued 41,513 shares and raised approximately $1.6 million under the DSPP. From the inception of the DSPP through June 30, 2013, we have issued 159,752 shares and raised approximately $6.2 million.

In March 2013, we updated our DSPP so that we are now paying for a majority of the plan-related fees, which were previously paid by our stockholders.

22. Commitments and Contingencies

In the ordinary course of business, we are party to various legal actions which we believe are routine in nature and incidental to the operation of our business. We believe that the outcome of the proceedings will not have a material adverse effect upon our consolidated financial position or results of operations.

Table of Contents

At June 30, 2013, we have contingent payments of $3.4 million for tenant improvements and leasing costs. In addition, as of June 30, 2013, we had committed $18.4 million under construction contracts, which is expected to be paid in the next twelve months.

23. Subsequent Events

In July 2013, we declared the following dividends, which will be paid in August 2013:

- $0.1815417 per share to our common stockholders;

- $0.140625 per share to our Class E preferred stockholders; and

- $0.138021 per share to our Class F preferred stockholders.

The Compensation Committee of our Board of Directors approved, effective July 1, 2013, the accelerated vesting of each restricted stock award that had originally been granted with ten-year vesting to five years. On July 1, 2013, 212,827 restricted shares vested as a result of this acceleration.

In July 2013, we issued $750 million of 4.65% senior unsecured notes due August 2023, or the 2023 Notes. The price to the investors for the 2023 Notes was 99.775% of the principal amount for an effective yield of 4.678% per annum. The total net proceeds of approximately $742.7 million from these offerings were used to repay all outstanding borrowings under our acquisition credit facility, and the remaining proceeds will be used for other general corporate purposes and working capital, which may include additional property acquisitions. Interest is paid semiannually on the 2023 Notes.

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

This quarterly report on Form 10-Q, including the documents incorporated by reference, contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. When used in this quarterly report, the words “estimated”, “anticipated”, “expect”, “believe”, “intend” and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements include discussions of strategy, plans, or intentions of management. Forward-looking statements are subject to risks, uncertainties, and assumptions about Realty Income Corporation, including, among other things:

· Our anticipated growth strategies;

· Our intention to acquire additional properties and the timing of these acquisitions;

· Our intention to sell properties and the timing of these property sales;

· Our intention to re-lease vacant properties;

· Anticipated trends in our business, including trends in the market for long-term net-leases of freestanding, single-tenant properties; and

· Future expenditures for development projects.

Table of Contents

Future events and actual results, financial and otherwise, may differ materially from the results discussed in the forward-looking statements. In particular, some of the factors that could cause actual results to differ materially are:

· Our continued qualification as a real estate investment trust;

· General business and economic conditions;

· Our recent acquisition of American Realty Capital Trust, Inc., or ARCT;

· Competition;

· Fluctuating interest rates;

· Access to debt and equity capital markets;

· Continued volatility and uncertainty in the credit markets and broader financial markets;

· Other risks inherent in the real estate business including tenant defaults, potential liability relating to environmental matters, illiquidity of real estate investments, and potential damages from natural disasters;

· Impairments in the value of our real estate assets;

· Changes in the tax laws of the United States of America;

· The outcome of any legal proceedings to which we are a party or which may occur in the future; and

· Acts of terrorism and war.

Additional factors that may cause risks and uncertainties include those discussed in the sections entitled “Business”, “Risk Factors” and “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K, for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2012.

Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date that this quarterly report was filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, or SEC. While forward-looking statements reflect our good faith beliefs, they are not guarantees of future performance. We undertake no obligation to publicly release the results of any revisions to these forward-looking statements that may be made to reflect events or circumstances after the date of this quarterly report or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events. In light of these risks and uncertainties, the forward-looking events discussed in this quarterly report might not occur.

THE COMPANY

Realty Income Corporation, The Monthly Dividend Company®, or Realty Income, is a publicly traded real estate company with the primary business objective of generating dependable monthly cash dividends from a consistent and predictable level of cash flow from operations. Our monthly dividends are supported by the cash flow from our portfolio of properties leased to commercial enterprises. We have in-house acquisition, leasing, legal, credit research, real estate research, portfolio management and capital markets expertise. Over the past 44 years, Realty Income and its predecessors have been acquiring and owning freestanding commercial properties that generate rental revenue under long-term lease agreements.

In 1994, Realty Income was listed upon the New York Stock Exchange, or NYSE, and we elected to be taxed as a real estate investment trust, or REIT, requiring us to distribute dividends to our stockholders aggregating at least 90% of our taxable income (excluding net capital gains).

We seek to increase distributions to stockholders and funds from operations, or FFO per share, through both active portfolio management and the acquisition of additional properties.

Generally, our portfolio management efforts seek to achieve:

· Contractual rent increases on existing leases;

· Rent increases at the termination of existing leases, when market conditions permit; and

· The active management of our property portfolio, including re-leasing vacant properties, and selectively selling properties, thereby mitigating our exposure to certain tenants and markets.

Table of Contents

In acquiring additional properties, our strategy is primarily to acquire properties that are:

· Freestanding, single-tenant locations;

· Leased to regional and national commercial enterprises; and

· Leased under long-term, net-lease agreements.

At June 30, 2013, we owned a diversified portfolio:

· Of 3,681 properties;

· With an occupancy rate of 98.2%, or 3,613 properties leased and only 68 properties available for lease;

· Leased to 194 different commercial enterprises doing business in 46 separate industries;

· Located in 49 states and Puerto Rico;

· With over 58.3 million square feet of leasable space; and

· With an average leasable space per property of approximately 15,800 square feet.

Of the 3,681 properties in the portfolio, 3,664, or 99.5%, are single-tenant properties, and the remaining 17 are multi-tenant properties. At June 30, 2013, of the 3,664 single-tenant properties, 3,597 were leased with a weighted average remaining lease term (excluding rights to extend a lease at the option of the tenant) of approximately 11.0 years.

Investment Philosophy

We typically acquire properties under long-term leases with regional and national retailers and other commercial enterprises. We believe that owning an actively managed, diversified portfolio of commercial properties under long-term, net leases produces consistent and predictable income. Our acquisition and investment activities generally focus on businesses providing goods and services that satisfy basic consumer and business needs. Net leases typically require the tenant to be responsible for monthly rent and property operating expenses including property taxes, insurance and maintenance. In general, our net-lease agreements:

· Are for initial terms of 10 to 20 years;

· Require the tenant to pay minimum monthly rent and property operating expenses (taxes, insurance and maintenance); and

· Provide for future rent increases based on increases in the consumer price index (typically subject to ceilings), additional rent calculated as a percentage of the tenants’ gross sales above a specified level, or fixed increases.

We believe that a portfolio of properties under long-term leases, coupled with the tenant’s responsibility for property expenses, generally produces a more predictable income stream than many other types of real estate portfolios, while continuing to offer the potential for growth in rental income.

We estimate that approximately 38% of our annualized rental revenue comes from properties leased to investment grade companies or their subsidiaries. At June 30, 2013, our top 15 tenants represent approximately 43% of our annualized revenue and eight of these 15 tenants have investment grade credit ratings.

Investment Strategy

When identifying new properties for acquisition, we generally focus on providing capital to owners and operators of commercial enterprises by acquiring the real estate they consider important to the successful operation of their business.

Table of Contents

We primarily focus on acquiring properties leased to commercial enterprises based on the following guidelines:

· Tenants with reliable and sustainable cash flow;

· Tenants with revenue and cash flow from multiple sources;

· Large owners and users of real estate;

· Real estate that is critical to the tenant’s ability to generate revenue (i.e. they need the property in which they operate in order to conduct their business);

· Real estate and tenants that are willing to sign a long-term lease (10 or more years); and

· Property transactions where we can achieve an attractive spread over our cost of capital.

Historically, our investment focus has primarily been on retail enterprises that have a service component because we believe the lease revenue from these types of businesses is more stable. Because of this investment focus, for the quarter ended June 30, 2013, approximately 63.9% of our retail rental revenue was derived from tenants with a service component in their business. We believe these service-oriented businesses would generally be difficult to duplicate over the Internet and that our properties will continue to perform well relative to competition from Internet-based businesses.

Credit Strategy

We typically acquire and lease properties to regional and national commercial enterprises and believe that within this market we can achieve an attractive risk-adjusted return. Since 1970, our occupancy rate at the end of each year has never been below 96%.

We believe the principal financial obligations of most commercial enterprises typically include their bank and other debt, payment obligations to suppliers and real estate lease obligations. Because we typically own the land and building in which a tenant conducts its business or which are critical to the tenant’s ability to generate revenue, we believe the risk of default on a tenant’s lease obligations is less than the tenant’s unsecured general obligations. It has been our experience that since tenants must retain their profitable and critical locations in order to survive; in the event of reorganization they are less likely to reject a lease for a profitable and critical location because this would terminate their right to use the property. Thus, as the property owner, we believe we will fare better than unsecured creditors of the same tenant in the event of reorganization. If a property is rejected by the tenant during reorganization, we own the property and can either lease it to a new tenant or sell the property. In addition, we believe that the risk of default on the real estate leases can be further mitigated by monitoring the performance of the tenants’ individual locations and considering whether to sell locations that are weaker performers.

In order to qualify for inclusion in our portfolio, new property acquisitions must meet stringent investment and credit requirements. The properties must generate attractive current yields and the tenant must meet our credit profile. We have established a four-part analysis that examines each potential investment based on:

· Industry, company, market conditions and credit profile;

· Store profitability for retail locations, if profitability data is available;

· The importance of the real estate location to the operations of the company’s business; and

· Overall real estate characteristics, including property value, replacement costs and comparative rental rates.

Prior to entering into any transaction, our investment professionals, assisted by our research department, conduct a review of a tenant’s credit quality. The information reviewed may include reports and filings, including any public credit ratings, financial statements, debt and equity analyst reports, and reviews of corporate credit spreads, stock prices, market capitalization and other financial metrics. While we have no defined minimum credit rating or balance sheet metrics for tenants, we anticipate that a majority of our newly acquired properties will be leased to tenants that have investment grade, or implied investment grade credit ratings. We conduct additional due diligence, including additional financial reviews of the tenant and a more comprehensive review of the business segment and industry in which the tenant operates. We continue to monitor our tenants’ credit quality on an ongoing basis by reviewing the available information previously discussed, and providing summaries of these findings to management.

Table of Contents

Acquisition Strategy

We seek to invest in industries in which several, well-organized, regional and national commercial enterprises are capturing market share through service, quality control, economies of scale, strong consumer brands, advertising, and the selection of prime locations. Our acquisition strategy is to act as a source of capital to regional and national commercial enterprises by acquiring and leasing back their real estate locations. In addition, we frequently acquire large portfolios of properties net leased to multiple tenants in a variety of industries. We undertake thorough research and analysis to identify what we consider to be appropriate industries, tenants and property locations for investment. Our research expertise is instrumental to uncovering net-lease opportunities in markets where our real estate financing program adds value. In selecting potential investments, we generally seek to acquire real estate that has the following characteristics:

· Properties that are freestanding, commercially-zoned with a single tenant;

· Properties that are important locations for regional and national commercial enterprises;

· Properties that we deem to be profitable for the tenants and/or can generally be characterized as important to the operations of the company’s business;

· Properties that are located within attractive demographic areas, relative to the business of our tenants, with high visibility and easy access to major thoroughfares; and

· Properties that can be purchased with the simultaneous execution or assumption of long-term, net-lease agreements, offering both current income and the potential for rent increases.

Portfolio Management Strategy

The active management of the property portfolio is an essential component of our long-term strategy. We continually monitor our portfolio for any changes that could affect the performance of the industries, tenants and locations in which we have invested. We also regularly analyze our portfolio with a view toward optimizing its returns and enhancing our credit quality.

Our executives regularly review and analyze:

· The performance of the various industries of our tenants; and

· The operation, management, business planning and financial condition of our tenants.

We have an active portfolio management program that incorporates the sale of assets when we believe the reinvestment of the sale proceeds will:

· Generate higher returns;

· Enhance the credit quality of our real estate portfolio;

· Extend our average remaining lease term; or

· Decrease tenant or industry concentration.

At June 30, 2013, we classified real estate with a carrying amount of $16.8 million as held for sale on our balance sheet. During the first six months of 2013, we sold 34 investment properties for $83.7 million. For the remainder of 2013, we intend to continue our active disposition efforts to further enhance the credit quality of our real estate portfolio and anticipate exceeding $100 million in property sales for all of 2013. We intend to invest these proceeds into new property acquisitions, if there are attractive opportunities available. However, we cannot guarantee that we will sell properties during the next 12 months at our estimated values or be able to invest the property sale proceeds in new properties.

Impact of Real Estate and Credit Markets

In the commercial real estate market, property prices generally continue to fluctuate. Likewise, during certain periods, the U.S. credit markets have experienced significant price volatility, dislocations and liquidity disruptions, which may impact our access to and cost of capital. We continually monitor the commercial real estate and U.S. credit markets carefully and, if required, will make decisions to adjust our business strategy accordingly.

Table of Contents

RECENT DEVELOPMENTS

Increases in Monthly Dividends to Common Stockholders

We have continued our 44-year policy of paying monthly dividends. Monthly dividends per common share increased by $0.0291667 in February 2013 to $0.1809167, increased by $0.0003125 in April 2013 to $0.1812292 per share, and increased by $0.0003125 in July 2013 to $0.1815417. The increase in July 2013 was our 63rd consecutive quarterly increase and the 72nd increase in the amount of our dividend since our listing on the NYSE in 1994. In the first six months of 2013, we paid one monthly cash dividend per common share of $0.15175, two monthly cash dividends per common share in the amount of $0.1809167, and three monthly cash dividends per common share in the amount of $0.1812292, totaling $1.057271 per common share. In June 2013 and July 2013, we declared dividends of $0.1815417 per share, which were paid in July 2013 and will be paid in August 2013, respectively.

The monthly dividend of $0.1815417 per share represents a current annualized dividend of $2.1785004 per share, and an annualized dividend yield of approximately 5.2% based on the closing sale price of our common stock on the NYSE of $41.92 on June 30, 2013. Although we expect to continue our policy of paying monthly dividends, we cannot guarantee that we will maintain our current level of dividends, that we will continue our pattern of increasing dividends per share, or what our actual dividend yield will be in any future period.

Acquisitions during the Second Quarter of 2013

During the second quarter of 2013, we invested $738.1 million in 190 new properties and properties under development or expansion, with an estimated initial weighted average contractual lease rate of 6.8%. The 190 new properties and properties under development or expansion are located in 32 states, will contain over 4.6 million leasable square feet and are 100% leased, with an average lease term of 13.8 years.

Acquisitions during the First Six Months of 2013

During the first six months of 2013, we invested $866.5 million in 206 new properties and properties under development or expansion (excluding American Realty Capital Trust, Inc., or ARCT), with an estimated initial weighted average contractual lease rate of 7.0%. The 206 new properties and properties under development or expansion are located in 35 states, will contain over 5.1 million leasable square feet and are 100% leased, with a weighted average lease term of 13.8 years. The tenants of the new properties acquired operate in 17 industries: aerospace, automotive collision services, automotive parts, convenience stores, crafts and novelties, dollar stores, drug stores, equipment services, food processing, general merchandise, health and fitness, health care, restaurants-casual dining, restaurants-quick service, sporting goods, transportation services, and wholesale clubs.

During the first quarter of 2013, we also completed our acquisition of ARCT for approximately $3.2 billion. Each outstanding share of ARCT common stock was converted into the right to receive a combination of: (i) $0.35 in cash and (ii) 0.2874 shares of our common stock, resulting in the issuance of a total of approximately 45.6 million shares of our common stock to ARCT shareholders, valued at a per share amount of $44.04, which was the closing sale price of our common stock on January 22, 2013. In connection with the acquisition, at the closing we terminated and repaid the amounts then outstanding of approximately $552.9 million under ARCT’s revolving credit facility and term loan. In connection with our acquisition of ARCT, we assumed approximately $516.3 million of mortgages payable. During the first six months of 2013, we incurred merger costs of $12.6 million and $7.9 million in 2012. We anticipate that the total merger costs will be approximately $21 million.

Table of Contents

The acquisition of ARCT provided immediate and long-term benefits to Realty Income, including growth in the size of our real estate portfolio, diversification of industries and property type, accretion to net earnings, increase in the percentage of investment grade tenants, and larger size and scope of our company, which increases competitive advantages in the net-lease marketplace.

Our acquisition of ARCT added 515 properties to our real estate portfolio. The 515 properties are located in 44 states and Puerto Rico, contain over 16.0 million leasable square feet and are 100% leased with a weighted average lease term of 12.2 years. The 69 tenants occupying the 515 properties acquired operate in 28 industries: aerospace, apparel stores, automotive parts, automotive tire services, automotive services, consumer appliances, consumer goods, convenience stores, crafts and novelties, dollar stores, drug stores, financial services, food processing, general merchandise, government services, grocery stores, health care, home furnishings, home improvement, jewelry, other manufacturing, pet supplies and services, restaurants – casual dining, restaurants – quick service, shoe stores, telecommunications, transportation services, and wholesale clubs.

Our combined total investment in real estate assets during the first six months of 2013 was $4.0 billion. None of our real estate investments during the first six months of 2013 caused any one tenant to be 10% or more of our total assets at June 30, 2013.

In the case of a property under development, the initial weighted average contractual lease rate is computed as follows: estimated net operating income (which is calculated by multiplying a predetermined capitalization rate by our projected total investment in the property, including land, construction and capitalized interest costs) for the first full year of each lease, divided by the total cost of the property. Of the $4.0 billion we invested in the first six months of 2013, $18.8 million was invested in 19 properties under development or expansion, with an estimated initial weighted average contractual lease rate of 8.6%. We may continue to pursue development or expansion opportunities under similar arrangements in the future.

Portfolio Discussion

Leasing Results

At June 30, 2013, we had 68 properties available for lease out of 3,681 properties in our portfolio, which represents a 98.2% occupancy rate. Since December 31, 2012, when we reported 84 properties available for lease and a 97.2% occupancy rate, we:

· Leased 15 properties;

· Sold ten properties available for lease; and

· Have nine new properties available for lease.

During the first six months of 2013, 71 properties with expiring leases were leased to either existing or new tenants. The annual rent on these leases was $10.1 million, as compared to the previous rent on these same properties of $9.8 million. At June 30, 2013, our average annualized rental revenue was approximately $13.25 per square foot on the 3,613 leased properties in our portfolio. At June 30, 2013, we classified 18 properties with a carrying amount of $16.8 million as held for sale on our balance sheet.

Investments in Existing Properties

In the second quarter of 2013, we capitalized costs of $1.6 million on existing properties in our portfolio, consisting of $362,000 for re-leasing costs and $1.3 million for building and tenant improvements. In the second quarter of 2012, we capitalized costs of $1.3 million on existing properties in our portfolio, consisting of $431,000 for re-leasing costs and $914,000 for building and tenant improvements.

Table of Contents

In the first six months of 2013, we capitalized costs of $3.3 million on existing properties in our portfolio, consisting of $774,000 for re-leasing costs and $2.5 million for building and tenant improvements. In the first six months of 2012, we capitalized costs of $2.4 million on existing properties in our portfolio, consisting of $698,000 for re-leasing costs and $1.7 million for building and tenant improvements. As part of our re-leasing costs, we pay leasing commissions and sometimes provide tenant rent concessions. Leasing commissions are paid based on the commercial real estate industry standard and any rent concessions provided are minimal. We do not consider the collective impact of the leasing commissions or tenant rent concessions to be material to our financial position or results of operations.

The majority of our building and tenant improvements relate to roof repairs, HVAC improvements, and parking lot resurfacing and replacements. It is not customary for us to offer significant tenant improvements on our properties as tenant incentives. The amounts of our capital expenditures can vary significantly, depending on the rental market, credit worthiness, and the willingness of tenants to pay higher rents over the terms of the leases.

Note Issuance

In July 2013, we issued $750 million of 4.65% senior unsecured notes due August 2023, or the 2023 Notes. The price to the investors for the 2023 Notes was 99.775% of the principal amount for an effective yield of 4.678% per annum. The total net proceeds of approximately $742.7 million from these offerings were used to repay all outstanding borrowings under our acquisition credit facility, and the remaining proceeds were used for general corporate purposes, including additional property acquisitions. Interest is paid semiannually on the 2023 Notes.

Accelerated Stock Vesting

Issuance of Common Stock

In March 2013, we issued 17,250,000 shares of common stock at a price of $45.90 per share. After underwriting discounts and other offering costs of $36.6 million, the net proceeds of $755.1 million were used to repay borrowings under our acquisition credit facility, which were used to fund property acquisitions, including our acquisition of ARCT.

In connection with our January 2013 acquisition of ARCT, we issued a total of 45,573,144 shares of our common stock to ARCT shareholders and redeemed 208,709 shares of our common stock that were previously held by ARCT.

Note Repayment

On their maturity date in March 2013, using proceeds from our March 2013 common stock offering and cash on hand, we repaid the $100 million of outstanding 5.375% notes we issued in March 2003 at a price equal to 100% of the principal amount, plus accrued and unpaid interest.

Term Loan

In January 2013, in conjunction with our acquisition of ARCT, we entered into a $70 million senior unsecured term loan maturing January 21, 2018, to partially repay the then outstanding ARCT term loan. Borrowing under the term loan bears interest at LIBOR, plus 1.20%. In conjunction with this term loan, we also acquired an interest rate swap which essentially fixes our per annum interest rate on the term loan at 2.15%.

Table of Contents

Noncontrolling Interests

As consideration for two separate acquisitions during the first six months of 2013, partnership interests of Tau Operating Partnership, L.P. and Realty Income, L.P. were issued to third parties. These units do not have voting rights, are entitled to monthly distributions equal to the amount paid to our common stockholders, and are redeemable in cash or our common stock, at our option and at a conversion ratio of one to one, subject to certain exceptions. As the general partner for each of these partnerships, we have operating and financial control over these entities and consolidate them in our financial statements and recorded as noncontrolling interests the partnership units held by third parties.

Issuance of Common and Preferred Units

In connection with our acquisition of ARCT in January 2013, we issued 317,022 common partnership units and 6,750 preferred partnership units. These common units are entitled to monthly distributions equivalent to the per common share amounts paid to the common stockholders of Realty Income. The preferred units are entitled to monthly payments at a rate of 2% per annum, or $135,000 per year.

Universal Shelf Registration

In February 2013, we filed a shelf registration statement with the SEC, which is effective for a term of three years and will expire in February 2016. This replaces our prior shelf registration statement. In accordance with SEC rules, the amount of securities to be issued pursuant to this shelf registration statement was not specified when it was filed and there is no specific dollar limit. The securities covered by this registration statement include (1) common stock, (2) preferred stock, (3) debt securities, (4) depositary shares representing fractional interests in shares of preferred stock, (5) warrants to purchase debt securities, common stock, preferred stock or depositary shares, and (6) any combination of these securities. We may periodically offer one or more of these securities in amounts, prices and on terms to be announced when and if the securities are offered. The specifics of any future offerings, along with the use of proceeds of any securities offered, will be described in detail in a prospectus supplement, or other offering materials, at the time of any offering.

Net Income Available to Common Stockholders

Net income available to common stockholders was $44.2 million in the second quarter of 2013, compared to $33.0 million in the second quarter of 2012, an increase of $11.2 million. On a diluted per common share basis, net income was $0.23 in the second quarter of 2013, compared to $0.25 in the second quarter of 2012.

Net income available to common stockholders was $105.5 million in the first six months of 2013, compared to $59.0 million in the first six months of 2012, an increase of $46.5 million. On a diluted per common share basis, net income available to common stockholders was $0.57 in the first six months of 2013, as compared to $0.44 in the first six months of 2012. Net income available to common stockholders in the first six months of 2013 includes $12.6 million of merger-related costs, which represents $0.07 on a diluted per common share basis, for the acquisition of ARCT. Net income available to common stockholders in the first six months of 2012 includes a $3.7 million charge for the excess of redemption value over carrying value of the Class D preferred shares, which represents $0.03 on a diluted per common share basis.

The calculation to determine net income available to common stockholders includes gains from the sale of properties. The amount of gains varies from period to period based on the timing of property sales and can significantly impact net income available to common stockholders.

Table of Contents

Gains from the sale of properties during the second quarter of 2013 were $5.7 million, as compared to $3.4 million during the second quarter of 2012. Gains from the sale of properties during the first six months of 2013 were $44.3 million, as compared to $4.0 million during the first six months of 2012.

Funds from Operations Available to Common Stockholders (FFO) and Normalized Funds from Operations Available to Common Stockholders (Normalized FFO)

In the second quarter of 2013, our FFO increased by $53.3 million, or 81.7%, to $118.5 million, compared to $65.2 million in the second quarter of 2012. On a diluted per common share basis, FFO was $0.60 in the second quarter of 2013 and $0.49 in the second quarter of 2012, an increase of 22.4%.

In the first six months of 2013, our FFO increased by $85.5 million, or 67.9%, to $211.4 million, compared to $125.9 million in the first six months of 2012. On a diluted per common share basis, FFO was $1.15 in the first six months of 2013, and $0.95 in the first six months of 2012, an increase of 21.1%. FFO, in the first six months of 2013, includes $12.6 million of merger-related costs, which represents $0.07 on a diluted per common share basis. FFO, in the first six months of 2012, includes a $3.7 million charge for the excess of redemption value over carrying value of the shares of our Class D preferred stock, which represents $0.03 on a diluted per common share basis.

We define normalized FFO as FFO excluding the merger-related costs for our acquisition of ARCT. In the second quarter of 2013, our normalized FFO increased by $54.0 million, or 82.8%, to $119.2 million, compared to $65.2 million in the second quarter of 2012. On a diluted per common share basis, normalized FFO was $0.61 in the second quarter of 2013 and $0.49 in the second quarter of 2012, an increase of 24.5%. In the first six months of 2013, our normalized FFO increased by $98.2 million, or 78.0%, to $224.1 million, as compared to $125.9 million in the first six months of 2012. On a diluted per common share basis, normalized FFO was $1.22 in the first six months of 2013, as compared to $0.95 in the first six months of 2012, an increase of 28.4%.

See our discussion of FFO and normalized FFO (which are not financial measures under U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, or GAAP), later in this “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” which includes a reconciliation of net income available to common stockholders to FFO and normalized FFO.

Adjusted Funds from Operations Available to Common Stockholders (AFFO)

In the second quarter of 2013, our AFFO increased by $49.1 million, or 73.8%, to $115.6 million, compared to $66.5 million in the second quarter of 2012. On a diluted common share basis, AFFO was $0.59 in the second quarter of 2013, and $0.50 in the second quarter of 2012, an increase of 18.0%. In the first six months of 2013, our AFFO increased by $86.7 million, or 65.3%, to $219.5 million, compared to $132.8 million in the first six months of 2012. On a diluted per common share basis, AFFO was $1.19 in the first six months of 2013, and $1.00 in the first six months of 2012, an increase of 19.0%.

See our discussion of AFFO (which is not a financial measure under GAAP), later in this “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” which includes a reconciliation of net income available to common stockholders to FFO, normalized FFO and AFFO.

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

Capital Philosophy

Historically, we have met our long-term capital needs by issuing common stock, preferred stock and long-term unsecured notes and bonds. Over the long term, we believe that common stock should be the majority of our capital structure. However, we may issue additional preferred stock or debt securities from time to time. We may issue common stock when we believe that our share price is at a level that allows for the proceeds of any offering to be accretively invested into additional properties. In addition, we may issue common stock to permanently finance properties that were financed by our credit facility or debt securities. However, we cannot assure you that we will have access to the capital markets at times and at terms that are acceptable to us.

Table of Contents

Our primary cash obligations, for the current year and subsequent years, are included in the “Table of Obligations,” which is presented later in this section. We expect to fund our operating expenses and other short-term liquidity requirements, including property acquisitions and development costs, payment of principal and interest on our outstanding indebtedness, property improvements, re-leasing costs and cash distributions to common and preferred stockholders, primarily through cash provided by operating activities, borrowing on our $1 billion credit facility, and periodically through public securities offerings.

Conservative Capital Structure

We believe that our stockholders are best served by a conservative capital structure. Therefore, we seek to maintain a conservative debt level on our balance sheet and solid interest and fixed charge coverage ratios. At June 30, 2013, our total outstanding borrowings of senior unsecured notes, term loan, mortgages payable and credit facility borrowings were $4.0 billion, or approximately 31.4% of our total market capitalization of $12.9 billion.

We define our total market capitalization at June 30, 2013 as the sum of:

· Shares of our common stock outstanding of 196,265,884 multiplied by the closing sales price of our common stock on the NYSE of $41.92 per share on June 30, 2013, or $8.2 billion;

· Aggregate liquidation value (par value of $25 per share) of the Class E preferred stock of $220 million;

· Aggregate liquidation value (par value of $25 per share) of the Class F preferred stock of $408.8 million;

· Outstanding borrowings of $701.0 million on our credit facility;

· Outstanding mortgages payable of $827.1 million;

· Outstanding borrowings of $70.0 million on our term loan; and

· Outstanding senior unsecured notes and bonds of $2.45 billion.

Cash Reserves

We are organized to operate as an equity REIT that acquires and leases properties and distributes to stockholders, in the form of monthly cash distributions, a substantial portion of our net cash flow generated from leases on our properties. We intend to retain an appropriate amount of cash as working capital. At June 30, 2013, we had cash and cash equivalents totaling $22.6 million.

We believe that our cash and cash equivalents on hand, cash provided from operating activities, and borrowing capacity is sufficient to meet our liquidity needs for the next twelve months. We intend, however, to use permanent or long-term capital to fund property acquisitions and to repay future borrowings under our credit facility.

$1 Billion Acquisition Credit Facility

We have a $1 billion unsecured acquisition credit facility, with an initial term that expires in May 2016, and includes, at our election, a one-year extension option. Under this credit facility, our current investment grade credit ratings provide for financing at the London Interbank Offered Rate, commonly referred to as LIBOR, plus 1.075% with a facility commitment fee of 0.175%, for all-in drawn pricing of 1.25% over LIBOR. The borrowing rate is not subject to an interest rate floor or ceiling. We also have other interest rate options available to us. Our credit facility is unsecured and, accordingly, we have not pledged any assets as collateral for this obligation. At June 30, 2013, we had a borrowing capacity of $299.0 million available on our credit facility (subject to customary conditions to borrowing) and an outstanding balance of $701.0 million. In July 2013, we issued $750.0 million of ten-year notes, and the proceeds were used to repay all outstanding borrowings on July 16, 2013. The interest rate on borrowings outstanding under our credit facility, at June 30, 2013, was 1.3% per annum. We must comply with various financial and other covenants in our credit facility. At June 30, 2013, we remain in compliance with these covenants.

Table of Contents

We expect to use our credit facility to acquire additional properties and for other corporate purposes. Any additional borrowings will increase our exposure to interest rate risk. We have the right to request an increase in the borrowing capacity of the credit facility, up to $500 million, to a total borrowing capacity of $1.5 billion. Any increase in the borrowing capacity is subject to approval by the lending banks participating in our credit facility.

We generally use our credit facility for the short-term financing of new property acquisitions. Thereafter, when capital is available on acceptable terms, we generally seek to refinance those borrowings with the net proceeds of long-term or permanent financing, which may include the issuance of common stock, preferred stock or debt securities. We cannot assure you, however, that we will be able to obtain any such refinancing, or that market conditions prevailing at the time of the refinancing will enable us to issue equity or debt securities upon acceptable terms.

Mortgage Debt

As of June 30, 2013, we had $793.2 million of mortgages payable, which were assumed in connection with our property acquisitions. Included in this amount is $516.3 million of mortgages payable assumed in connection with the ARCT acquisition. Additionally, at June 30, 2013, we had net premiums totaling $33.9 million on these mortgages, of which $19.6 million is in connection with the ARCT acquisition. During the first six months of 2013, we paid $2.7 million in principal payments. As of June 30, 2013, the weighted average stated interest rate of our mortgages payable was 5.4% and the weighted average remaining years until maturity was 4.5 years.

We expect to pay off the mortgages payable as soon as prepayment penalties have declined to a level that will make it economically feasible to do so. We intend to continue to primarily identify property acquisitions that are free from mortgage indebtedness.

Term Loan

In January 2013, in conjunction with our acquisition of ARCT, we entered into a $70 million senior unsecured term loan maturing in January 2018. Borrowing under the term loan bears interest at LIBOR, plus 1.20%. In conjunction with this term loan, we also acquired an interest rate swap which essentially fixes our per annum interest rate on the term loan at 2.15%.

Notes Outstanding

Our senior unsecured note and bond obligations consist of the following as of June 30, 2013, sorted by maturity date (dollars in millions):

	June 30,
	2013
5.5% notes, issued in November 2003 and due in November 2015	$	150
5.95% notes, issued in September 2006 and due in September 2016	275
5.375% notes, issued in September 2005 and due in September 2017	175
2.0% notes, issued in October 2012 and due in January 2018	350
6.75% notes, issued in September 2007 and due in August 2019	550
5.75% notes, issued in June 2010 and due in January 2021	250
3.25% notes, issued in October 2012 and due in October 2022	450
5.875% bonds, $100 issued in March 2005 and $150 issued in June 2011, both due in March 2035	250
	$	2,450

As of June 30, 2013, the weighted average interest rate of our notes and bonds payable was 4.97% and the weighted average remaining years until maturity was 7.5 years. In March 2013, we repaid $100 million of our 5.375% notes, at maturity, by utilizing proceeds from our March common stock offering and our credit line.

Table of Contents

All of our outstanding notes and bonds have fixed interest rates. Interest on all of our senior note and bond obligations is paid semiannually. All of these notes and bonds contain various covenants. At June 30, 2013, we remain in compliance with these covenants.

The following is a summary of the key financial covenants for our senior unsecured notes, as defined and calculated per the terms of our notes. These calculations, which are not based on U.S. GAAP measurements, are presented to investors to show our ability to incur additional debt under the terms of our notes only and are not measures of our liquidity or performance. The actual amounts as of June 30, 2013 are:

Note Covenants	Required	Actual

Limitation on incurrence of total debt	< 60% of adjusted assets	42.8%
Limitation on incurrence of secured debt	< 40% of adjusted assets	8.8%
Debt service coverage (trailing 12 months)(1)	> 1.5 x	4.1x
Maintenance of total unencumbered assets	> 150% of unsecured debt	246.3%

(1)This covenant is calculated on a pro forma basis for the preceding four-quarter period on the assumption that: (i) the incurrence of any Debt (as defined in the covenants) incurred by us since the first day of such four-quarter period and the application of the proceeds therefrom (including to refinance other Debt since the first day of such four-quarter period), (ii) the repayment or retirement of any of our other Debt since the first day of such four-quarter period, and (iii) any acquisition or disposition by us of any asset or group of assets since the first day of such four-quarters had in each case occurred on April 1, 2012, and subject to certain additional adjustments. Such pro forma ratio has been prepared on the basis required by that debt service covenant, reflects various estimates and assumptions and is subject to other uncertainties, and therefore does not purport to reflect what our actual debt service coverage ratio would have been had transactions referred to in clauses (i), (ii) and (iii) of the preceding sentence occurred as of April 1, 2012, nor does it purport to reflect our debt service coverage ratio for any future period. In addition, as noted above, the debt service coverage ratio set forth under the caption “Actual” in the above table does not give effect to the issuance of the notes issued in July 2013. After the issuance in July 2013 of $750 million of 4.65% notes due in 2023, we continued to be in compliance with this covenant. The following is our calculation of debt service coverage at June 30, 2013 (in thousands, for trailing twelve months):

Net income	$	202,956
Plus: interest expense	139,494
Plus: provision for taxes	1,612
Plus: depreciation and amortization	228,165
Plus: provisions for impairment	8,091
Plus: pro forma adjustments	161,213
Less: gain on sales of investment properties	(50,212		)
Income available for debt service, as defined	$	691,319
Total Pro forma debt service charge	$	169,160
Debt service coverage ratio	4.1

Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio

Fixed charge coverage ratio is calculated in exactly the same manner as the debt service coverage ratio, except that preferred stock dividends are also added to the denominator. We consider fixed charge coverage ratio to be an appropriate supplemental measure of a company’s ability to make its interest and preferred stock dividend payments. Our calculation of the fixed charge coverage ratio may be different from the calculation used by other companies and, therefore, comparability may be limited. This information should not be considered as an alternative to any GAAP liquidity measures. Below is our calculation of fixed charges at June 30, 2013 (in thousands, for trailing twelve months):

Income available for debt service, as defined	$	691,319
Pro forma debt service charge plus preferred stock dividends	211,089
Fixed charge coverage ratio	3.3

Table of Contents

Credit Agency Ratings

The borrowing interest rates under our credit facility are based upon our ratings assigned by credit rating agencies. We are currently assigned the following investment grade corporate credit ratings on our senior unsecured notes and bonds: Fitch Ratings has assigned a rating of BBB+ with a “stable” outlook, Moody’s Investors Service has assigned a rating of Baa1 with a “stable” outlook, and Standard & Poor’s Ratings Group has assigned a rating of BBB+ with a “stable” outlook to our senior notes.

Based on our current ratings, the current facility interest rate is LIBOR plus 1.075% with a facility commitment fee of 0.175%, for all-in drawn pricing of 1.25% over LIBOR. The credit facility provides that the interest rate can range between: (i) LIBOR plus 1.85% if our credit rating is lower than BBB-/Baa3 and (ii) LIBOR plus 1.00% if our credit rating is A-/A3 or higher. In addition, our credit facility provides for a facility commitment fee based on our credit ratings, which range from (i) 0.45% for a rating lower than BBB-/Baa3, and (ii) 0.15% for a credit rating of A-/A3 or higher.

We also issue senior debt securities from time to time and our credit ratings can impact the interest rates charged in those transactions. If our credit ratings or ratings outlook change, our cost to obtain debt financing could increase or decrease.

The credit ratings assigned to us could change based upon, among other things, our results of operations and financial condition. These ratings are subject to ongoing evaluation by credit rating agencies and we cannot assure you that our ratings will not be changed or withdrawn by a rating agency in the future if, in its judgment, circumstances warrant. Moreover, a rating is not a recommendation to buy, sell or hold our debt securities, preferred stock or common stock.

The following table summarizes the maturity of each of our obligations as of June 30, 2013 (dollars in millions):

Table of

Obligations						Ground	Ground
						Leases	Leases
		Notes				Paid by	Paid by
Year of	Credit	and	Term	Mortgages		Realty	Our
Maturity	Facility(1)	Bonds	Loan	Payable(2)	Interest(3)	Income(4)	Tenants(5)	Other(6)	Totals
2013	$ 701.0	$ -	$ -	$ 24.3	$ 87.2	$ 0.4	$ 7.3	$ 21.8	$ 842.0
2014	-	-	-	64.4	163.4	0.8	14.4	-	243.0
2015	-	150.0	-	125.5	157.1	0.8	14.4	-	447.8
2016	-	275.0	-	248.4	132.4	0.8	14.4	-	671.0
2017	-	175.0	-	133.0	110.4	0.9	14.3	-	433.6
Thereafter	-	1,850.0	70.0	197.6	471.4	9.4	241.1	-	2,839.5
Totals	$ 701.0	$2,450.0	$70.0	$ 793.2	$ 1,121.9	$ 13.1	$ 305.9	$ 21.8	$5,476.9

(1) The initial term of the credit facility expires in May 2016 and includes, at our option, a one-year extension. Since our credit facility was paid off in full on July 16, 2013 as a result of our July 2013 note offering, we have assumed a maturity date of 2013 for purposes of this schedule.

(2) Excludes non-cash net premiums recorded on the mortgages payable. The unamortized balance of these net premiums at June 30, 2013, is $33.9 million.

(3) Interest on the term loan, notes, bonds and mortgages payable has been calculated based on outstanding balances as of June 30, 2013 through their respective maturity dates.

(4) Realty Income currently pays the ground lessors directly for the rent under the ground leases.

(5) Our tenants, who are generally sub-tenants under ground leases, are responsible for paying the rent under these ground leases. In the event a tenant fails to pay the ground lease rent, we are primarily responsible.

(6) “Other” consists of $18.4 million of commitments under construction contracts and $3.4 million of contingent payments for tenant improvements and leasing costs.

Our credit facility and notes payable obligations are unsecured. Accordingly, we have not pledged any assets as collateral for these obligations.

Table of Contents

Preferred Stock and Preferred Units Outstanding

In 2006, we issued 8.8 million shares of our 6.75% Monthly Income Class E Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock. Beginning December 7, 2011, shares of Class E preferred stock were redeemable at our option for $25.00 per share, plus any accrued and unpaid dividends. Dividends on shares of Class E preferred stock are paid monthly in arrears.

In February 2012, we issued 14.95 million shares of our 6.625% Monthly Income Class F Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock at $25.00 per share. In April 2012, we issued an additional 1.4 million shares of Class F Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock at $25.2863 per share. Beginning February 15, 2017, shares of our Class F preferred stock are redeemable at our option for $25.00 per share, plus any accrued and unpaid dividends. Dividends on the shares of Class F preferred shares are paid monthly in arrears.

We are current in our obligations to pay dividends on our Class E and Class F preferred stock.

As part of our acquisition of ARCT in January 2013, we issued 6,750 partnership units. Payments on these preferred units are made monthly in arrears at rate of 2% per annum, or $135,000 per year, and are included in interest expense.

No Unconsolidated Investments

We have no unconsolidated investments, nor do we engage in trading activities involving energy or commodity contracts.

Dividend Policy

Distributions are paid monthly to our common, Class E preferred and Class F preferred stockholders if, and when, declared by our Board of Directors.

Distributions are paid monthly to the limited partners holding common units of Tau Operating Partnership, L.P. and Realty Income, L.P., each on a per unit basis that is generally equal to the amount paid per share to our common stockholders.

In order to maintain our status as a REIT for federal income tax purposes, we generally are required to distribute dividends to our stockholders aggregating annually at least 90% of our taxable income (excluding net capital gains), and we are subject to income tax to the extent we distribute less than 100% of our taxable income (including net capital gains). In 2012, our cash distributions to preferred and common stockholders totaled $275.8 million, or approximately 131.4% of our estimated taxable income of $209.9 million. Our estimated taxable income reflects non-cash deductions for depreciation and amortization. Our estimated taxable income is presented to show our compliance with REIT dividend requirements and is not a measure of our liquidity or operating performance. We intend to continue to make distributions to our stockholders that are sufficient to meet this dividend requirement and that will reduce or eliminate our exposure to income taxes. Furthermore, we believe our funds from operations are more than sufficient to support our current level of cash distributions to our stockholders. Our cash distributions to common stockholders, for the first six months of 2013, totaled $191.7 million, representing 87.3% of our adjusted funds from operations available to common stockholders of $219.5 million. In comparison, our 2012 cash distributions to common stockholders totaled $236.3 million, representing 86.2% of our adjusted funds from operations available to common stockholders of $274.2 million.

The Class E preferred stockholders receive cumulative distributions at a rate of 6.75% per annum on the $25.00 per share liquidation preference (equivalent to $1.6875 per annum per share). The Class F preferred stockholders receive cumulative distributions at a rate of 6.625% per annum on the $25.00 per share liquidation preference (equivalent to $1.65625 per annum per share). Dividends on our Class E and Class F preferred stock are current.

Table of Contents

Future distributions will be at the discretion of our Board of Directors and will depend on, among other things, our results of operations, FFO, normalized FFO, AFFO, cash flow from operations, financial condition, capital requirements, the annual distribution requirements under the REIT provisions of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, our debt service requirements and any other factors the Board of Directors may deem relevant. In addition, our credit facility contains financial covenants that could limit the amount of distributions payable by us in the event of a default, and which prohibit the payment of distributions on the common or preferred stock in the event that we fail to pay when due (subject to any applicable grace period) any principal or interest on borrowings under our credit facility.

Distributions of our current and accumulated earnings and profits for federal income tax purposes generally will be taxable to stockholders as ordinary income, except to the extent that we recognize capital gains and declare a capital gains dividend, or that such amounts constitute “qualified dividend income” subject to a reduced rate of tax. The maximum federal income tax rate of non-corporate taxpayers for “qualified dividend income” is generally 20%. In general, dividends payable by REITs are not eligible for the reduced tax rate on qualified dividend income, except to the extent that certain holding requirements have been met with respect to the REIT’s stock and the REIT’s dividends are attributable to dividends received from certain taxable corporations (such as our other taxable REIT subsidiaries) or to income that was subject to tax at the corporate or REIT level (for example, if we distribute taxable income that we retained and paid tax on in the prior taxable year).

Distributions in excess of earnings and profits generally will first be treated as a non-taxable reduction in the stockholders’ basis in their stock, but not below zero. Distributions in excess of that basis, generally, will be taxable as a capital gain to stockholders who hold their shares as a capital asset. Approximately 24.5% of the distributions to our common stockholders, made or deemed to have been made in 2012, were classified as a return of capital for federal income tax purposes. We estimate that in 2013, between 15% and 25% of the distributions may be classified as a return of capital.

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Critical Accounting Policies

Our consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with GAAP, and are the basis for our discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations. Preparing our consolidated financial statements requires us to make a number of estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. We believe that we have made these estimates and assumptions in an appropriate manner and in a way that accurately reflects our financial condition. We continually test and evaluate these estimates and assumptions using our historical knowledge of the business, as well as other factors, to ensure that they are reasonable for reporting purposes. However, actual results may differ from these estimates and assumptions. This summary should be read in conjunction with the more complete discussion of our accounting policies and procedures included in note 2 to our consolidated financial statements in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012.

In order to prepare our consolidated financial statements according to the rules and guidelines set forth by GAAP, many subjective judgments must be made with regard to critical accounting policies. One of these judgments is our estimate for useful lives in determining depreciation expense for our properties. Depreciation on a majority of our buildings and improvements is computed using the straight–line method over an estimated useful life of 25 to 35 years. If we use a shorter or longer estimated useful life, it could have a material impact on our results of operations. We believe that 25 to 35 years is an appropriate estimate of useful life.

When acquiring a property for investment purposes, we allocate the fair value of real estate acquired to: (1) land, (2) building and improvements, and (3) indentified intangible assets and liabilities, based in each case on their estimated fair values. Intangible assets and liabilities consist of above-market or below-market lease value of in-place leases, the value of in-place leases, and tenant relationships, as applicable. In addition, any assumed mortgages receivable or payable and any assumed or issued noncontrolling interests are recorded at their estimated fair values.

Table of Contents

Another significant judgment must be made as to if, and when, impairment losses should be taken on our properties when events or a change in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the asset may not be recoverable. A provision is made for impairment if estimated future operating cash flows (undiscounted and without interest charges) plus estimated disposition proceeds (undiscounted) are less than the current book value of the property. Key inputs that we estimate in this analysis include projected rental rates, estimated holding periods, capital expenditures, and property sales capitalization rates. If a property is held for sale, it is carried at the lower of carrying cost or estimated fair value, less estimated cost to sell. The carrying value of our real estate is the largest component of our consolidated balance sheet. Our strategy of primarily holding properties, long-term, directly decreases the likelihood of their carrying values not being recoverable, thus requiring the recognition of an impairment. However, if our strategy, or one or more of the above assumptions were to change in the future, an impairment may need to be recognized. If events should occur that require us to reduce the carrying value of our real estate by recording provisions for impairment, they could have a material impact on our results of operations.

The following is a comparison of our results of operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013 to the three and six months ended June 30, 2012.

Rental Revenue

Rental revenue was $182.4 million for the second quarter of 2013, as compared to $112.5 million for the second quarter of 2012, an increase of $69.9 million, or 62.1%. The increase in rental revenue in the second quarter of 2013 compared to the second quarter of 2012 is primarily attributable to:

· The 721 properties (21.2 million square feet) acquired by Realty Income in 2013, which generated $47.7 million of rent in the second quarter of 2013;

· The 423 properties (10.6 million square feet) acquired by Realty Income in 2012, which generated $20.2 million of rent in the second quarter of 2013 compared to $1.5 million of rent in the second quarter of 2012, an increase of $18.7 million;

· Same store rents generated on 2,388 properties (20.4 million square feet) during the second quarter of 2013 and 2012, increased by $1.2 million, or 1.1%, to $109.9 million from $108.7 million;

· A net increase of $336,000 relating to the aggregate of (i) rental revenue from properties (168 properties comprising 1.5 million square feet) that were available for lease during part of 2013 or 2012, (ii) rental revenue related to 78 properties sold during 2013 and 2012, (iii) rental revenue for six properties under development, (iv) rental revenue for 24 properties re-leased with rent-free periods, and (v) lease termination settlements, which, in aggregate, totaled $2.1 million in the second quarter of 2013 compared to $1.8 million in the second quarter of 2012; and

· A net increase in straight-line rent and other non-cash adjustments to rent of $1.9 million in the second quarter of 2013 as compared to the second quarter of 2012.

Rental revenue was $352.1 million for the first six months of 2013, as compared to $224.0 million for the first six months of 2012, an increase of $128.1 million, or 57.2%. The increase in rental revenue in the first six months of 2013 compared to the first six months of 2012 is primarily attributable to:

· The 721 properties (21.2 million square feet) acquired by Realty Income in 2013, which generated $82.4 million of rent in the first six months of 2013;

· The 423 properties (10.6 million square feet) acquired by Realty Income in 2012, which generated $40.2 million of rent in the first six months of 2013 compared to $1.5 million of rent in the first six months of 2012, an increase of $38.7 million;

· Same store rents generated on 2,388 properties (20.4 million square feet) during the first six months of 2013 and 2012, increased by $2.8 million, or 1.3%, to $220.3 million from $217.5 million;

Table of Contents

· A net increase of $233,000 relating to the aggregate of (i) rental revenue from properties (168 properties comprising 1.5 million square feet) that were available for lease during part of 2013 or 2012, (ii) rental revenue related to 78 properties sold during 2013 and 2012, (iii) rental revenue for six properties under development, (iv) rental revenue for 24 properties re-leased with rent-free periods, and (vi) lease termination settlements, which, in aggregate, totaled $4.08 million in the second quarter of 2013 compared to $3.85 million in the second quarter of 2012; and

· A net increase in straight-line rent and other non-cash adjustments to rent of $4.0 million in the first six months of 2013 as compared to the first six months of 2012.

For purposes of determining the same store rent property pool, we include all properties that were owned for the entire year-to-date period, for both the current and prior year except for properties during the current or prior year that; (i) were available for lease at any time, (ii) were under development, (iii) we have made an additional investment in, (iv) were involved in eminent domain and rent was reduced, and (v) were re-leased with rent-free periods. Each of the exclusions from the same store pool is separately addressed within the applicable sentences above explaining the changes in rental revenue for the period.

Of the 3,681 properties in the portfolio at June 30, 2013, 3,664, or 99.5%, are single-tenant properties and the remaining 17 are multi-tenant properties. Of the 3,664 single-tenant properties, 3,597, or 98.2%, were net leased with a weighted average remaining lease term (excluding rights to extend a lease at the option of the tenant) of approximately 11.0 years at June 30, 2013. Of our 3,597 leased single-tenant properties, 3,284, or 91.3%, were under leases that provide for increases in rents through:

· Primarily base rent increases tied to a consumer price index (typically subject to ceilings);

· Percentage rent based on a percentage of the tenants’ gross sales;

· Fixed increases; or

· A combination of two or more of the above rent provisions.

Percentage rent, which is included in rental revenue, was $157,000 in the second quarter of 2013, and $267,000 in the second quarter of 2012 (excluding percentage rent reclassified to discontinued operations of $8,000 in the second quarter of 2013 and $9,000 in the second quarter of 2012). Percentage rent was $1.1 million in the first six months of 2013, and $841,000 in the first six months of 2012 (excluding percentage rent reclassified to discontinued operations of $22,000 in the first six months of 2013 and $18,000 in the first six months of 2012). Percentage rent, in the second quarter and first six months of 2013, was less than 1% of rental revenue, and we anticipate percentage rent to continue to be less than 1% of rental revenue for the remainder of 2013.

Our portfolio of real estate, leased primarily to regional and national commercial enterprises under net leases, continues to perform well and provides dependable lease revenue supporting the payment of monthly dividends to our stockholders. At June 30, 2013, our portfolio of 3,681 properties was 98.2% leased with 68 properties available for lease, as compared to 84 at December 31, 2012 and 75 at June 30, 2012. It has been our experience that approximately 2% to 4% of our property portfolio will be unleased at any given time; however, it is possible that the number of properties available for lease could exceed these levels in the future.

Depreciation and Amortization

Depreciation and amortization was $77.7 million for the second quarter of 2013, as compared to $34.7 million for the second quarter of 2012. Depreciation and amortization was $147.3 million for the first six months of 2013, as compared to $69.1 million for the first six months of 2012. The increase in depreciation and amortization was primarily due to the acquisition of properties in 2013 and 2012, including the 515 properties acquired as part of our acquisition of ARCT, which was partially offset by property sales in those same years. As discussed in the section entitled “Funds from Operations Available to Common Stockholders and Normalized Funds from Operations Available to Common Stockholders” and “Adjusted Funds from Operations Available to Common Stockholders,” depreciation and amortization is a non-cash item that is added back to net income available to common stockholders for our calculation of FFO, normalized FFO, and AFFO.

Table of Contents

Interest Expense

Interest expense was $39.1 million for the second quarter of 2013, as compared to $28.8 million for the second quarter of 2012. Interest expense was $80.6 million for the first six months of 2013, as compared to $57.8 million for the first six months of 2012. The increase in interest expense was primarily due to an increase in borrowings attributable to the issuance in October 2012 of our 2.00% senior unsecured notes due January 2018, the October 2012 issuance of our 3.25% senior unsecured notes due October 2022, an increase in mortgages payable and higher credit facility borrowings, which were partially offset by lower average interest rates.

The following is a summary of the components of our interest expense (dollars in thousands):

	Three months ended						Six months ended
	June 30,						June 30,
	2013			2012			2013			2012

Interest on our credit facility, term loan, notes and mortgages	$	41,421		$	27,522		$	82,605		$	55,473
Interest included in discontinued operations	(132		)	(149		)	(263		)	(339		)
Credit facility commitment fees	442			415			880			792
Amortization of credit facility origination costs and deferred financing costs	1,740			1,181			3,441			2,224
(Gain) loss on interest rate swap	(1,738		)	40			(1,286		)	53
Amortization of net mortgage premiums	(2,494		)	(71		)	(4,441		)	(168		)
Interest capitalized	(139		)	(132		)	(369		)	(277		)
Interest expense	$	39,100		$	28,806		$	80,567		$	57,758

	Three months ended						Six months ended
	June 30,						June 30,
Credit facility, term loan, mortgages and notes	2013			2012			2013			2012

Average outstanding balances (dollars in thousands)	$	3,479,690		$	1,883,041		$	3,555,012		$	1,902,648
Average interest rates	4.76		%	5.85		%	4.64		%	5.83		%

At June 30, 2013, the weighted average interest rate on our:

· Notes and bonds payable of $2.45 billion was 4.97%;

· Mortgages payable of $827.1 million was 3.94% (effective rate);

· Credit facility outstanding borrowings of $701.0 million was 1.27%;

· Term loan outstanding borrowings of $70.0 million was 1.39%; and

· Combined outstanding notes, bonds, mortgages, term loan, and credit facility borrowings of $4.05 billion was 4.06%.

General and Administrative Expenses

General and administrative expenses increased by $2.8 million to $12.1 million, in the second quarter of 2013, as compared to $9.3 million in the second quarter of 2012. Included in general and administrative expenses are acquisition transaction costs (excluding ARCT) of $675,000 during the second quarter of 2013, as compared to $392,000 for the second quarter of 2013. General and administrative expenses increased by $5.3 million to $23.7 million, in the first six months of 2013, as compared to $18.4 million in the first six months of 2013. Included in general and administrative expenses are acquisition transaction costs (excluding ARCT) of $818,000, during the first six months of 2013, as compared to $634,000 for the first six months of 2012. Even though general and administrative expenses increased, during the first six months of 2013, primarily due to increases in employee costs, and higher costs as a result of our integration of ARCT, general and administrative expenses as a percentage of total revenue decreased. In July 2013, we had 104 employees, as compared to 89 employees in July 2012.

Table of Contents

	Three months ended						Six months ended

	June 30,						June 30,
Dollars in thousands	2013			2012			2013			2012
General and administrative expenses	$	12,075		$	9,273		$	23,688		$	18,440
Total revenue, including discontinued operations(1)	184,949			116,168			358,145			231,103
General and administrative expenses as a percentage of total revenue	6.5		%	8.0		%	6.6		%	8.0		%

(1) Excludes gain on sales and Crest net revenue.

Property Expenses

Property expenses consist of costs associated with unleased properties, non-net leased properties and general portfolio expenses. Expenses related to unleased properties and non-net leased properties include, but are not limited to, property taxes, maintenance, insurance, utilities, property inspections, bad debt expense and legal fees. General portfolio costs include, but are not limited to, insurance, legal, property inspections, and title search fees. At June 30, 2013, 68 properties were available for lease, as compared to 84 at December 31, 2012 and 75 at June 30, 2012.

Property expenses were $3.3 million in the second quarter of 2013, and $1.7 million in the second quarter of 2012. Property expenses were $6.9 million in the first six months of 2013, and $3.7 million in the first six months of 2012. The increase in property expenses is primarily attributable to higher maintenance and utilities, insurance costs, and property expenses as a result of our acquisition of ARCT, partially offset by a decrease in legal fees and bad debt expense.

Income Taxes

Income taxes were $722,000 in the second quarter of 2013, as compared to $405,000 in the second quarter of 2012. Income taxes were $1.4 million in the first six months of 2013, as compared to $810,000 in the first six months of 2012. These amounts are for city and state income and franchise taxes paid by Realty Income.

Merger-Related Costs

Merger-related costs include, but are not limited to, advisor fees, legal fees, accounting fees, printing fees and transfer taxes related to our acquisition of ARCT. Merger-related costs were $605,000 for the second quarter of 2013, and $12.6 million for the first six months of 2013. On a diluted per common share basis, this expense represented $0.07 for the first six months of 2013. There were no merger-related costs incurred during the first six months of 2012.

Table of Contents

Discontinued Operations

Operations from 18 investment properties classified as held for sale at June 30, 2013, plus properties previously sold, have been classified as discontinued operations. The following is a summary of income from discontinued operations on our consolidated statements of income (dollars in thousands):

	Three months ended						Six months ended

	June 30,						June 30,

Income from discontinued operations	2013			2012			2013			2012
Gain on sales of investment properties	$	5,744		$	3,354		$	44,304		$	3,965
Rental revenue	623			3,029			2,668			6,204
Other revenue	7			6			17			21
Depreciation and amortization	(196		)	(896		)	(520		)	(1,848		)
Property expenses	(36		)	(443		)	(491		)	(1,105		)
Provisions for impairment	(2,496		)	-			(2,952		)	-
Crest’s income from discontinued operations	265			196			536			325

Income from discontinued operations	$	3,911		$	5,246		$	43,562		$	7,562
Per common share, basic and diluted(1)	$	0.02		$	0.04		$	0.24		$	0.06

(1)	The per share amounts for income from discontinued operations above and the income from continuing operations and net income reported on the consolidated statements of income have each been calculated independently.

Crest’s Assets and Property Sales

At June 30, 2013, Crest had an inventory of four properties, three of which are classified as held for investment. In addition to the four properties, Crest also held notes receivable of $18.9 million at June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012.

During the first six months of 2013 and 2012, Crest did not buy or sell any properties and did not record any provisions for impairment.

Gain on Sales of Investment Properties by Realty Income

Provisions for Impairment on Realty Income Investment Properties

For the second quarter of 2013, we recorded total provisions for impairment of $2.5 million on one sold property and two properties classified as held for sale. For the first six months of 2013, we recorded total provisions for impairment of $3.0 million on six sold properties and two properties classified as held for sale. These provisions for impairment are included in income from discontinued operations on our consolidated statement of income for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013. No provisions for impairment were recorded by Realty Income for the first six months of 2012.

Table of Contents

Preferred Stock Dividends

Preferred stock dividends totaled $10.5 million in the second quarters of 2013 and 2012, $21.0 million in the first six months of 2013, and $20.0 million in the first six months of 2012.

Excess of Redemption Value over Carrying Value of Preferred Shares Redeemed

When we redeemed our Class D preferred stock in March 2012, we incurred a charge of $3.7 million for the excess of redemption value over the carrying value. This charge, representing the Class D preferred stock original issuance cost that was paid in 2004, was recorded as a reduction to net income available to common stockholders when the shares were redeemed during the first quarter of 2012. On a diluted per common share basis, this charge was $0.03.

Net Income Available to Common Stockholders

Net income available to common stockholders was $44.2 million, in the second quarter of 2013, an increase of $11.2 million, as compared to $33.0 million in the second quarter of 2012. Net income available to common stockholders was $105.5 million, in the first six months of 2013, an increase of $46.5 million as compared to $59.0 million in the first six months of 2012. Net income available to common stockholders, in the first six months of 2013, includes $12.6 million of merger-related costs, which represents $0.07 on a diluted per common share basis, for the acquisition of ARCT. Net income available to common stockholders, in the first six months of 2012, includes a $3.7 million charge for the excess of redemption value over carrying value of the Class D preferred shares, which represents $0.03 on a diluted per common share basis.

Gains from the sale of investment properties, during the second quarter of 2013, were $5.7 million, as compared to $3.4 million of gains recognized during the second quarter of 2012. Gains from the sale of investment properties, during the first six months of 2013, were $44.3 million, as compared to $4.0 million of gains recognized during the first six months of 2012.

FUNDS FROM OPERATIONS AVAILABLE TO COMMON STOCKHOLDERS (FFO) AND NORMALIZED FUNDS FROM OPERATIONS AVAILABLE TO COMMON STOCKHOLDERS (Normalized FFO)

FFO for the second quarter of 2013 increased by $53.3 million, or 81.7%, to $118.5 million, as compared to $65.2 million for the second quarter of 2012. FFO for the first six months of 2013 increased by $85.5 million, or 67.9%, to $211.4 million, as compared to $125.9 million for the first six months of 2012. FFO for the first six months of 2013 includes $12.6 million for merger-related costs related to our acquisition of ARCT. FFO for the first six months of 2012 includes a $3.7 million charge associated with the Class D preferred stock redemption in March 2012.

We define normalized FFO as FFO excluding the merger-related costs for our 2013 acquisition of ARCT. Normalized FFO for the second quarter of 2013 increased by $54.0 million, or 82.8%, to $119.2 million, as compared to $65.2 million for the second quarter of 2012. Normalized FFO for the first six months of 2013 increased by $98.2 million, or 78.0%, to $224.1 million, as compared to $125.9 million for the first six months of 2012.

Table of Contents

The following is a reconciliation of net income available to common stockholders (which we believe is the most comparable GAAP measure) to FFO and normalized FFO. Also presented is information regarding distributions paid to common stockholders and the weighted average number of common shares used for the basic and diluted computation per share (dollars in thousands, except per share amounts):

	Three months ended						Six months ended
	June 30,						June 30,
	2013			2012			2013			2012

Net income available to common stockholders	44,188			32,950			105,509			59,022
Depreciation and amortization:
Continuing operations	77,698			34,742			147,280			69,093
Discontinued operations	196			896			520			1,848
Depreciation allocated to noncontrolling interest	(220		)	-			(395		)	-
Depreciation of furniture, fixtures and equipment	(67		)	(67		)	(127		)	(135		)
Provisions for impairment on investment properties	2,496			-			2,952			-
Gain on sale of investment properties, discontinued operations	(5,744		)	(3,354		)	(44,304		)	(3,965		)

FFO available to common stockholders	118,547			65,167			211,435			125,863
Merger-related costs	605			-			12,635			-

Normalized FFO available to common stockholders	$	119,152		$	65,167		$	224,070		$	125,863

FFO per common share:
Basic	$	0.61		$	0.49		$	1.15		$	0.95
Diluted	$	0.60		$	0.49		$	1.15		$	0.95

Normalized FFO per common share, basic and diluted:	$	0.61		$	0.49		$	1.22		$	0.95

Distributions paid to common stockholders	$	106,692		$	58,360		$	191,669		$	116,552

Normalized FFO in excess of distributions paid to common stockholders	$	12,460		$	6,807		$	32,401		$	9,311

Weighted average number of common shares used for computation per share:
Basic	195,574,014			132,592,939			183,714,191			132,643,698
Diluted	196,099,610			132,828,540			184,165,700			132,785,213

We define FFO, a non-GAAP measure, consistent with the National Association of Real Estate Investment Trust’s definition, as net income available to common stockholders, plus depreciation and amortization of real estate assets, plus impairments of depreciable real estate assets, reduced by gains on sale of investment properties and extraordinary items. We define normalized FFO, a non-GAAP measure, as FFO excluding the merger-related costs for our 2013 acquisition of ARCT.

We consider FFO and normalized FFO to be appropriate supplemental measures of a REIT’s operating performance as they are based on a net income analysis of property portfolio performance that adds back items such as depreciation and impairments for FFO, and adds back merger-related costs, for normalized FFO. The historical accounting convention used for real estate assets requires straight-line depreciation of buildings and improvements, which implies that the value of real estate assets diminishes predictably over time. Since real estate values historically rise and fall with market conditions, presentations of operating results for a REIT, using historical accounting for depreciation, could be less informative. The use of FFO is recommended by the REIT industry as a supplemental performance measure. In addition, FFO is used as a measure of our compliance with the financial covenants of our credit facility.

Table of Contents

ADJUSTED FUNDS FROM OPERATIONS AVAILABLE TO COMMON STOCKHOLDERS (AFFO)

AFFO for the second quarter of 2013 increased by $49.1 million, or 73.8%, to $115.6 million, as compared to $66.5 million in the second quarter of 2012. AFFO for the first six months of 2013 increased by $86.7 million, or 65.3%, to $219.5 million, as compared to $132.8 million in the first six months of 2012. We consider AFFO to be an appropriate supplemental measure of our performance. Most companies in our industry use a similar measurement, but they may use the term “CAD” (for Cash Available for Distribution), “FAD” (for Funds Available for Distribution) or other terms.

The following is a reconciliation of net income available to common stockholders (which we believe is the most comparable GAAP measure) to FFO, normalized FFO and AFFO. Also presented is information regarding distributions paid to common stockholders and the weighted average number of common shares used for the basic and diluted computation per share (dollars in thousands, except per share amounts):

	Three months ended						Six months ended
	June 30,						June 30,
	2013			2012			2013			2012
Net income available to common stockholders	$	44,188		$	32,950		$	105,509		$	59,022
Cumulative adjustments to calculate FFO(1)	74,359			32,217			105,926			66,841
FFO available to common stockholders	118,547			65,167			211,435			125,863
Merger-related costs	605			-			12,635			-
Normalized FFO available to common stockholders	119,152			65,167			224,070			125,863
Excess of redemption value over carrying value of Class D preferred share redemption	-			-			-			3,696
Amortization of share-based compensation	3,653			2,593			7,498			5,550
Amortization of deferred financing costs(2)	1,015			609			2,021			1,226
Amortization of net mortgage premiums	(2,494		)	(71		)	(4,441		)	(168		)
(Gain) loss on interest rate swaps	(1,738		)	40			(1,286		)	53
Capitalized leasing costs and commissions	(361		)	(431		)	(774		)	(698		)
Capitalized building improvements	(1,255		)	(914		)	(2,520		)	(1,707		)
Other adjustments(3)	(2,408		)	(494		)	(5,047		)	(1,022		)
Total AFFO available to common stockholders	$	115,564		$	66,499		$	219,521		$	132,793

AFFO per common share, basic and diluted:	$	0.59		$	0.50		$	1.19		$	1.00

Distributions paid to common stockholders	$	106,692		$	58,360		$	191,669		$	116,552

AFFO in excess of distributions paid to common stockholders	$	8,872		$	8,139		$	27,852		$	16,241

Weighted average number of common shares used for computation per share:
Basic	195,574,014			132,592,939			183,714,191			132,643,698
Diluted	196,099,610			132,828,540			184,165,700			132,785,213

(1) See reconciling items for FFO presented under “Funds from Operations Available to Common Stockholders (FFO) and Normalized Funds from Operations Available to Common Stockholders (Normalized FFO).”

(2) Includes the amortization of costs incurred and capitalized when our notes were issued in March 2003, November 2003, March 2005, September 2005, September 2006, September 2007, June 2010, June 2011 and October 2012. Additionally, this includes the amortization of deferred financing costs incurred and capitalized in connection with our assumption of the mortgages payable and the issuance of our term loan. The deferred financing costs are being amortized over the lives of the respective mortgages and term loan. No costs associated with our credit facility agreements or annual fees paid to credit rating agencies have been included.

(3) Includes straight-line rent revenue and the amortization of above and below-market leases.

Table of Contents

We believe the non-GAAP financial measure AFFO provides useful information to investors because it is a widely accepted industry measure of the operating performance of real estate companies that is used by industry analysts and investors who look at and compare those companies. In particular, AFFO provides an additional measure to compare the operating performance of different REITs without having to account for differing depreciation assumptions and other unique revenue and expense items which are not pertinent to measuring a particular company’s on-going operating performance. Therefore, we believe that AFFO is an appropriate supplemental performance metric, and that the most appropriate GAAP performance metric to which AFFO should be reconciled is net income available to common stockholders.

Table of Contents

Presentation of the information regarding FFO, normalized FFO and AFFO is intended to assist the reader in comparing the operating performance of different REITs, although it should be noted that not all REITs calculate FFO, normalized FFO and AFFO in the same way, so comparisons with other REITs may not be meaningful. Furthermore, FFO, normalized FFO and AFFO are not necessarily indicative of cash flow available to fund cash needs and should not be considered as alternatives to net income as an indication of our performance. FFO, normalized FFO and AFFO should not be considered as alternatives to reviewing our cash flows from operating, investing, and financing activities. In addition, FFO, normalized FFO and AFFO should not be considered as measures of liquidity, of our ability to make cash distributions, or of our ability to pay interest payments.

PROPERTY PORTFOLIO INFORMATION

At June 30, 2013, we owned a diversified portfolio:

· Of 3,681 properties;

· With an occupancy rate of 98.2%, or 3,613 properties leased and only 68 properties available for lease;

· Leased to 194 different commercial enterprises doing business in 46 separate industries;

· Located in 49 states and Puerto Rico;

· With over 58.3 million square feet of leasable space; and

· With an average leasable space per property of approximately 15,800 square feet.

At June 30, 2013, of our 3,681 properties, 3,597 were leased under net-lease agreements. A net lease typically requires the tenant to be responsible for minimum monthly rent and property operating expenses including property taxes, insurance and maintenance. In addition, our tenants are typically subject to future rent increases based on increases in the consumer price index (typically subject to ceilings), additional rent calculated as a percentage of the tenants’ gross sales above a specified level, or fixed increases.

As a result of our acquisition of ARCT, the following industry table has been modified from similar tables we have prepared in the past to reflect the changes below:

· Four new industries were added: (1) “government services,” (2) “health care,” (3) “jewelry,” and (4) “other manufacturing”; and

· Some properties previously included in the “other” industry were reclassified to both the “health care” and “government services” industries to better reflect the industry in which the tenant operates.

Table of Contents

Industry Diversification

The following table sets forth certain information regarding Realty Income’s property portfolio classified according to the business of the respective tenants, expressed as a percentage of our total rental revenue:

	Percentage of Rental Revenue(1)
	For the Quarter Ended		For the Years Ended
	June 30,		Dec 31,		Dec 31,		Dec 31,		Dec 31,		Dec 31,		Dec 31,
	2013		2012		2011		2010		2009		2008		2007
Retail industries
Apparel stores	1.9	%	1.7	%	1.4	%	1.2	%	1.1	%	1.1	%	1.2	%
Automotive collision services	0.8		1.1		0.9		1.0		1.1		1.0		1.1
Automotive parts	1.1		1.0		1.2		1.4		1.5		1.6		2.1
Automotive service	2.2		3.1		3.7		4.7		4.8		4.8		5.2
Automotive tire services	3.9		4.7		5.6		6.4		6.9		6.7		7.3
Book stores	0.1		0.1		0.1		0.1		0.2		0.2		0.2
Child care	3.0		4.5		5.2		6.5		7.3		7.6		8.4
Consumer electronics	0.3		0.5		0.5		0.6		0.7		0.8		0.9
Convenience stores	11.4		16.3		18.5		17.1		16.9		15.8		14.0
Crafts and novelties	0.5		0.3		0.2		0.3		0.3		0.3		0.3
Dollar stores	5.6		2.2		-		-		-		-		-
Drug stores	6.9		3.5		3.8		4.1		4.3		4.1		2.7
Education	0.5		0.7		0.7		0.8		0.9		0.8		0.8
Entertainment	0.7		0.9		1.0		1.2		1.3		1.2		1.4
Equipment services	0.1		0.1		0.2		0.2		0.2		0.2		0.2
Financial services	1.7		0.2		0.2		0.2		0.2		0.2		0.2
General merchandise	1.1		0.6		0.6		0.8		0.8		0.8		0.7
Grocery stores	3.2		3.7		1.6		0.9		0.7		0.7		0.7
Health and fitness	5.9		6.8		6.4		6.9		5.9		5.6		5.1
Health care	*		-		-		-		-		-		-
Home furnishings	0.9		1.0		1.1		1.3		1.3		2.4		2.6
Home improvement	1.3		1.5		1.7		2.0		2.2		2.1		2.4
Jewelry	0.1		-		-		-		-		-		-
Motor vehicle dealerships	1.6		2.1		2.2		2.6		2.7		3.2		3.1
Office supplies	0.5		0.8		0.9		0.9		1.0		1.0		1.1
Pet supplies and services	0.9		0.6		0.7		0.9		0.9		0.8		0.9
Restaurants - casual dining	5.5		7.3		10.9		13.4		13.7		14.3		14.9
Restaurants - quick service	4.4		5.9		6.6		7.7		8.3		8.2		6.6
Shoe stores	0.1		0.1		0.2		0.1		-		-		-
Sporting goods	1.8		2.5		2.7		2.7		2.6		2.3		2.6
Theaters	6.3		9.4		8.8		8.9		9.2		9.0		9.0
Transportation services	0.1		0.2		0.2		0.2		0.2		0.2		0.2
Wholesale clubs	3.3		3.2		0.7		-		-		-		-
Other	*		0.1		0.1		0.3		1.1		1.2		1.9
Retail industries	77.7	%	86.7	%	88.6	%	95.4	%	98.3	%	98.2	%	97.8	%

Table of Contents

Industry Diversification (continued)
	Percentage of Rental Revenue(1)
	For the Quarter Ended		For the Years Ended
	June 30,		Dec 31,		Dec 31,		Dec 31,		Dec 31,		Dec 31,		Dec 31,
	2013		2012		2011		2010		2009		2008		2007
Non-retail industries
Aerospace	0.9		0.9		0.5		-		-		-		-
Beverages	3.4		5.1		5.6		3.0		-		-		-
Consumer appliances	0.6		0.1		-		-		-		-		-
Consumer goods	1.1		0.1		-		-		-		-		-
Crafts and novelties	0.1		-		-		-		-		-		-
Diversified industrial	0.1		0.1		-		-		-		-		-
Equipment services	0.3		0.3		0.2		-		-		-		-
Financial services	0.5		0.4		0.3		-		-		-		-
Food processing	1.6		1.3		0.7		-		-		-		-
Government services	1.5		0.1		0.1		0.1		0.1		-		-
Health care	2.2		*		*		-		-		-		-
Home furnishings	0.2		-		-		-		-		-		-
Home improvement	0.3		-		-		-		-		-		-
Insurance	0.1		*		-		-		-		-		-
Machinery	0.2		0.1		-		-		-		-		-
Other manufacturing	0.6		-		-		-		-		-		-
Packaging	1.0		0.7		0.4		-		-		-		-
Paper	0.2		0.1		0.1		-		-		-		-
Shoe stores	0.9		-		-		-		-		-		-
Telecommunications	0.7		0.8		0.7		-		-		-		-
Transportation services	5.8		2.2		1.6		-		-		-		-
Other	*		1.0		1.2		1.5		1.6		1.8		2.2
Non-retail industries	22.3	%	13.3	%	11.4	%	4.6	%	1.7	%	1.8	%	2.2	%
Totals	100.0	%	100.0	%	100.0	%	100.0	%	100.0	%	100.0	%	100.0	%

* Less than 0.1%

(1) Includes rental revenue for all properties owned by Realty Income at the end of each period presented, including revenue from properties reclassified as discontinued operations. Excludes revenue from properties owned by Crest.

Table of Contents

Property Type Diversification

The following table sets forth certain property type information regarding Realty Income’s property portfolio as of June 30, 2013 (dollars in thousands):

		Approximate	Rental Revenue for		Percentage of
	Number of	Leasable	the Quarter Ended		Rental
Property Type	Properties	Square Feet	June 30, 2013(1)		Revenue
Retail	3,543	36,740,700	$	141,914	77.7	%
Distribution	64	15,302,300	21,350		11.7
Office	36	2,277,800	9,691		5.3
Agriculture	15	184,500	5,145		2.8
Manufacturing	11	3,457,500	4,267		2.3
Industrial	12	383,200	355		0.2
Totals	3,681	58,346,000	$	182,722	100.0	%

(1) Includes rental revenue for all properties owned by Realty Income at June 30, 2013, including revenue from properties reclassified as discontinued operations of $392. Excludes revenue of $24 from properties owned by Crest.

Tenant Diversification

The largest tenants based on percentage of total portfolio rental revenue at June 30, 2013 include the following:


FedEx	5.3	%	Rite Aid	2.3	%
LA Fitness	4.5	%	Regal Cinemas	2.2	%
Walgreens	4.1	%	Dollar General	2.1	%
Family Dollar	3.5	%	CVS Pharmacy	2.0	%
AMC Theatres	3.3	%	The Pantry	1.9	%
Diageo	3.1	%	Circle K	1.8	%
BJ’s Wholesale Clubs	3.0	%	Walmart/Sam’s Club	1.7	%
Northern Tier Energy/Super America	2.7	%

Table of Contents

Service Category Diversification for our Retail Properties

The following table sets forth certain information regarding the 3,543 retail properties, included in our 3,681 total properties, owned by Realty Income at June 30, 2013, classified according to the business types and the level of services they provide (dollars in thousands):

	Number of	Retail Rental Revenue		Percentage of
	Retail	for the Quarter Ended		Retail Rental
Retail Industries	Properties	June 30, 2013(1)		Revenue
Tenants Providing Services
Automotive collision services	23	$	1,514	1.1	%
Automotive service	232		4,031	2.8
Child care	224		5,443	3.8
Education	14		841	0.6
Entertainment	9		1,199	0.9
Equipment services	2		150	0.1
Financial services	106		3,111	2.2
Health and fitness	60		10,859	7.7
Health care	23		1,870	1.3
Theaters	44		11,538	8.1
Transportation services	1		206	0.1
Other	10		74	0.1
	748		40,836	28.8
Tenants Selling Goods and Services
Automotive parts (with installation)	40		914	0.6
Automotive tire services	184		7,175	5.1
Convenience stores	781		20,738	14.6
Motor vehicle dealerships	16		2,889	2.0
Pet supplies and services	13		659	0.5
Restaurants - casual dining	326		9,365	6.6
Restaurants - quick service	396		8,037	5.7
	1,756		49,777	35.1
Tenants Selling Goods
Apparel stores	21		3,450	2.4
Automotive parts	61		1,185	0.8
Book stores	1		104	0.1
Consumer electronics	8		591	0.4
Crafts and novelties	10		1,002	0.7
Dollar stores	474		10,191	7.2
Drug stores	189		12,567	8.8
General merchandise	50		1,975	1.4
Grocery stores	64		5,813	4.1
Home furnishings	61		1,683	1.2
Home improvement	30		2,120	1.5
Jewelry	4		226	0.2
Office supplies	11		865	0.6
Shoe stores	1		168	0.1
Sporting goods	23		3,257	2.3
Wholesale clubs	31		6,104	4.3
	1,039		51,301	36.1
Total Retail Properties	3,543	$	141,914	100.0	%

(1) Includes rental revenue for all retail properties owned by Realty Income at June 30, 2013, including revenue from properties reclassified as discontinued operations of $392. Excludes revenue of $40,808 from non-retail properties and $24 from properties owned by Crest.

Table of Contents

Lease Expirations

The following table sets forth certain information regarding Realty Income’s property portfolio regarding the timing of the lease term expirations (excluding rights to extend a lease at the option of the tenant) on our 3,597 net leased, single-tenant properties as of June 30, 2013 (dollars in thousands):

	Total Portfolio					Initial Expirations(3)				Subsequent Expirations(4)

Year	Number of Leases Expiring(1)	Approx. Leasable Sq. Feet	Rental Revenue for the Quarter Ended June 30, 2013	% of Total Rental Revenue		Number of Leases Expiring	Rental Revenue for the Quarter Ended June 30, 2013	% of Total Rental Revenue		Number of Leases Expiring	Rental Revenue for the Quarter Ended June 30, 2013	% of Total Rental Revenue

2013	107	828,000	$ 2,642	1.5	%	31	$ 977	0.6	%	76	$ 1,665	0.9	%
2014	155	1,074,200	3,834	2.1		53	1,753	1.0		102	2,081	1.1
2015	169	911,500	3,868	2.1		67	1,779	1.0		102	2,089	1.1
2016	187	1,110,300	4,094	2.3		119	2,492	1.4		68	1,602	0.9
2017	171	1,978,900	5,690	3.1		45	2,954	1.6		126	2,736	1.5
2018	243	3,244,300	10,022	5.5		162	7,670	4.2		81	2,352	1.3
2019	168	2,787,200	9,645	5.3		156	9,147	5.0		12	498	0.3
2020	107	3,358,200	8,238	4.5		96	7,869	4.3		11	369	0.2
2021	187	5,164,600	13,130	7.2		179	12,611	6.9		8	519	0.3
2022	209	7,563,800	14,051	7.8		201	13,794	7.6		8	257	0.2
2023	328	4,436,600	16,865	9.3		317	16,268	9.0		11	597	0.3
2024	137	2,065,500	6,145	3.4		137	6,145	3.4		-	-	0.0
2025	288	3,702,200	16,113	8.9		283	15,992	8.8		5	121	0.1
2026	232	3,326,200	11,476	6.4		229	11,394	6.3		3	82	0.1
2027	444	4,371,300	14,920	8.2		442	14,880	8.2		2	40	*
2028 - 2043	465	11,192,500	40,567	22.4		458	40,420	22.3		7	147	0.1
Totals	3,597	57,115,300	$ 181,300	100.0	%	2,975	$ 166,145	91.6	%	622	$ 15,155	8.4	%

*	Less than 0.1%

(1)	Excludes 16 multi-tenant properties and 68 vacant unleased properties, one of which is a multi-tenant property. The lease expirations for properties under construction are based on the estimated date of completion of those properties.

(2)	Includes rental revenue of $392 from properties reclassified as discontinued operations and excludes revenue of $1,422 from 16 multi-tenant properties and from 68 vacant and unleased properties at June 30, 2013. Excludes revenue of $24 from four properties owned by Crest.

(3)	Represents leases to the initial tenant of the property that are expiring for the first time.

(4)	Represents lease expirations on properties in the portfolio, which have previously been renewed, extended or re-tenanted.

Table of Contents

Geographic Diversification

The following table sets forth certain state-by-state information regarding Realty Income’s property portfolio as of June 30, 2013 (dollars in thousands):

					Rental Revenue
				Approximate	for the Quarter		Percentage of
	Number of	Percent		Leasable	Ended		Rental
State	Properties	Leased		Square Feet	June 30, 2013 (1)		Revenue

Alabama	88	97	%	665,800	$	2,545	1.4	%
Alaska	2	100		128,500	307		0.2
Arizona	105	97		1,141,000	4,895		2.7
Arkansas	30	93		559,200	1,122		0.6
California	148	100		3,998,100	19,288		10.6
Colorado	67	99		729,200	2,474		1.4
Connecticut	24	100		468,000	2,107		1.2
Delaware	16	100		29,500	418		0.2
Florida	239	99		2,564,000	10,322		5.6
Georgia	180	96		2,396,400	7,259		4.0
Hawaii	--	--		--	--		--
Idaho	13	100		91,800	473		0.3
Illinois	140	100		3,463,000	9,493		5.2
Indiana	96	98		978,500	4,274		2.3
Iowa	34	91		2,675,600	3,026		1.7
Kansas	76	100		1,564,400	3,105		1.7
Kentucky	39	97		754,500	2,668		1.5
Louisiana	66	100		756,500	2,268		1.2
Maine	9	100		126,400	489		0.3
Maryland	32	100		1,113,500	3,715		2.0
Massachusetts	82	94		723,900	3,117		1.7
Michigan	101	100		923,200	2,866		1.6
Minnesota	155	100		1,152,000	7,198		3.9
Mississippi	90	96		1,233,900	2,274		1.2
Missouri	122	99		2,311,000	6,466		3.5
Montana	2	50		30,000	3		*
Nebraska	26	100		381,800	1,253		0.7
Nevada	19	100		372,400	1,189		0.7
New Hampshire	19	100		295,000	1,187		0.6
New Jersey	63	97		403,900	2,608		1.4
New Mexico	24	100		182,500	516		0.3
New York	80	99		1,970,300	9,942		5.4
North Carolina	119	97		1,105,200	4,284		2.3
North Dakota	7	100		66,000	117		0.1
Ohio	188	97		4,689,700	9,977		5.5
Oklahoma	110	100		1,448,800	2,330		1.3
Oregon	24	100		455,200	1,517		0.8
Pennsylvania	149	99		1,712,600	6,988		3.8
Rhode Island	3	100		11,000	37		*
South Carolina	121	97		776,800	3,949		2.2
South Dakota	11	100		133,500	263		0.1
Tennessee	148	97		1,921,300	4,649		2.5
Texas	382	98		6,523,300	17,472		9.6
Utah	11	100		731,000	1,191		0.7
Vermont	5	100		78,200	432		0.2
Virginia	122	97		2,488,900	6,285		3.4
Washington	38	100		404,000	1,268		0.7
West Virginia	11	100		252,000	864		0.5
Wisconsin	38	95		1,315,300	1,956		1.1
Wyoming	3	100		21,100	63		*
Puerto Rico	4	100		28,300	213		0.1
Totals\Average	3,681	98	%	58,346,000	$	182,722	100.0	%

* Less than 0.1%

Table of Contents

IMPACT OF INFLATION

Tenant leases generally provide for limited increases in rent as a result of increases in the tenants’ sales volumes, increases in the consumer price index (typically subject to ceilings), or fixed increases. We expect that inflation will cause these lease provisions to result in rent increases over time. During times when inflation is greater than increases in rent, as provided for in the leases, rent increases may not keep up with the rate of inflation.

Of our 3,681 properties in the portfolio, approximately 97.7% or 3,597 are leased to tenants under net leases where the tenant is responsible for property expenses. Net leases tend to reduce our exposure to rising property expenses due to inflation. Inflation and increased costs may have an adverse impact on our tenants if increases in their operating expenses exceed increases in revenue.

IMPACT OF RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS

As of June 30, 2013, the impact of recent accounting pronouncements on our business is not considered to be material.

OTHER INFORMATION

Our common stock is listed on the NYSE under the ticker symbol “O” with a cusip number of 756109-104. Our central index key number is 726728.

Our 6.75% Monthly Income Class E Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock is listed on the NYSE under the ticker symbol “OprE” with a cusip number of 756109-708.

Our 6.625% Monthly Income Class F Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock is listed on the NYSE under the ticker symbol “OprF” with a cusip number of 756109-807.

We maintain a corporate website at www.realtyincome.com. On our website we make available, free of charge, copies of our annual report on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, Form 3s, Form 4s, Form 5s, current reports on Form 8-K, and amendments to those reports, as soon as reasonably practicable after we electronically file these reports with the SEC. None of the information on our website is deemed to be a part of this report.

We are committed to providing an enjoyable, diverse and safe working atmosphere for our employees, to upholding our responsibilities as a public company operating for the benefit of our shareholders and to being mindful of the environment. As The Monthly Dividend Company®, we believe our primary responsibility is to provide a dividend return to our shareholders. How we manage and use the physical, human and financial resources that enable us to acquire and own the real estate, which provides us with the lease revenue to pay monthly dividends, demonstrates our commitment to corporate responsibility.

Social Responsibility and Ethics. We are committed to being socially responsible and conducting our business according to the highest ethical standards. Our employees enjoy compensation that is in line with those of our peers and competitors, including generous healthcare benefits for employees and their families; participation in a 401K plan with a matching contribution by Realty Income; competitive vacation and time-off benefits; paid maternity leave and an infant-at-work program for new parents. Our employees also have access to members of our Board of Directors to report any suspicion of misconduct, by any member of our senior management or executive team. We also have a long-standing commitment to equal employment opportunity and adhere to all Equal Employer Opportunity Policy guidelines.

Table of Contents

With respect to our vendors and tenants we apply the principles of full and fair disclosure in all of our business dealings, as outlined in our Corporate Code of Business Ethics. We are also committed to dealing fairly with all of our customers, suppliers and competitors.

Corporate Governance. We believe that nothing is more important than a company’s reputation for integrity and serving as a responsible fiduciary for its shareholders. We are committed to managing the company for the benefit of our shareholders and are focused on maintaining good corporate governance. Practices that illustrate this commitment include:

· Our Board of Directors is comprised of six independent, non-employee directors and one employee director (the Chief Executive Officer and Vice Chairman of the Board)

· Our Board of Directors is elected on an annual basis

· We employ a majority vote standard for elections

· Our Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors works with independent consultants, in conducting annual compensation reviews for our key executives, and compensates each individual based on reaching certain performance metrics that determine the success of our company

· We adhere to all other corporate governance principles outlined in our “Corporate Governance Guidelines” document.

Environmental Practices. Our focus on energy related matters is demonstrated by how we manage our day-to-day activities in our corporate headquarters building. With respect to other properties that we own, which are net-leased to our tenants who are responsible for maintaining the buildings, we encourage energy conservation and environmental sustainability practices wherever possible. In our headquarters building we promote energy conservation and encourage the following practices:

· Powering down office equipment at the end of the day

· Setting fax and copier machines to “energy saver mode”

· Encouraging employees to use “duplex” copy mode to reduce paper usage whenever possible

· Employing an automated “lights out” system that is activated 24/7

· Programming HVAC to only operate during normal business operating hours

In addition, our headquarters building was constructed according to the State of California energy standards and we have installed solar panels on our roof to fulfill our energy requirements. All of the windows on our building are dual-paned to increase energy efficiency and reduce our carbon footprint.

With respect to recycling and reuse practices, we encourage the use of recycled products and the recycling of materials during our operations. Recycling bins are placed in all areas where materials are regularly disposed of and at the individual desks of our employees. Cell phones, wireless devices and office equipment are recycled or donated whenever possible. We also continue to pursue a paperless environment since this reduces costs and saves trees. As a result, we encourage file-sharing networks and environments to produce and edit documents in order to reduce the dissemination of hard copy documents.

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

We are exposed to interest rate changes primarily as a result of our credit facility, term loan, and long-term notes and bonds used to maintain liquidity and expand our real estate investment portfolio and operations. Our interest rate risk management objective is to limit the impact of interest rate changes on earnings and cash flow and to lower our overall borrowing costs. To achieve these objectives we issue long-term notes and bonds, primarily at fixed rates.

In order to mitigate and manage the effects of interest rate risks on our operations, we may utilize a variety of financial instruments, including interest rate swaps and caps. The use of these types of instruments to hedge our exposure to changes in interest rates carries additional risks, including counterparty credit risk, the enforceability of hedging contracts and the risk that unanticipated and significant changes in interest rates will cause a significant loss of basis in the contract. To limit

Table of Contents

counterparty credit risk we will seek to enter into such agreements with major financial institutions with favorable credit ratings. There can be no assurance that we will be able to adequately protect against the foregoing risks or realize an economic benefit that exceeds the related amounts incurred in connection with engaging in such hedging activities. We do not enter into any derivative transactions for speculative or trading purposes.

The following table presents by year of expected maturity, the principal amounts, average interest rates, and estimated fair values of our fixed and variable rate debt as of June 30, 2013. This information is presented to evaluate the expected cash flows and sensitivity to interest rate changes (dollars in millions):

Expected Maturity Data

Year of maturity	Fixed rate debt		Average interest rate on fixed rate debt		Variable rate debt		Average interest rate on variable rate debt
2013	$	23.5	6.98	%	$	701.8	1.27	%
2014	62.5		6.19	%	1.9		4.85	%
2015	250.0		5.42	%	25.6		4.71	%
2016	521.1		5.39	%	2.3		4.88	%
2017	281.8		5.68	%	26.1		5.05	%
Thereafter	2,040.1		4.83	%	77.5		1.51	%

Totals (1)	$	3,179.0	5.09	%	$	835.2	1.54	%

Fair Value (2)	$	3,356.5			$	834.4

(1) Excludes net premiums recorded on mortgages payable. The unamortized balance of these net premiums is $33.9 million at June 30, 2013.

(2) We base the estimated fair value of the fixed rate senior notes at June 30, 2013 on the indicative market prices and recent trading activity of our notes payable. We base the estimated fair value of our fixed rate and variable rate mortgages at June 30, 2013 on the current 5-year, 7-year or 10-year Treasury yield curve, plus an applicable credit-adjusted spread. We believe that the carrying value of the credit facility balance and term loan balance reasonably approximate their estimated fair values at June 30, 2013.

The table incorporates only those exposures that exist as of June 30, 2013. It does not consider those exposures or positions that could arise after that date. As a result, our ultimate realized gain or loss, with respect to interest rate fluctuations, would depend on the exposures that arise during the period, our hedging strategies at the time, and interest rates.

All of our outstanding notes and bonds have fixed interest rates. All of our mortgages payable, except two, have fixed interest rates. Interest on our credit facility and term loan balance is variable. However, the variable interest rate feature on our term loan has been mitigated by an interest rate swap agreement. Based on our credit facility balance of $701.0 million at June 30, 2013, a 1% change in interest rates would change our interest costs by $7.0 million per year.

Item 4. Controls and Procedures

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

We maintain disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our Exchange Act reports is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. In designing and evaluating the disclosure controls and procedures, management recognized that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objectives, and management necessarily was required to

Table of Contents

apply its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible controls and procedures.

As of and for the quarter ended June 30, 2013, we carried out an evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures, under the supervision and with the participation of management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer. Based on the foregoing, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective and were operating at a reasonable assurance level.

Changes in Internal Controls

There were no changes to our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the quarter ended June 30, 2013 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting. As of June 30, 2013, there were no material weaknesses in our internal controls, and therefore, no corrective actions were taken.

Limitations on the Effectiveness of Controls

Internal control over financial reporting cannot provide absolute assurance of achieving financial reporting objectives because of its inherent limitations. Internal control over financial reporting is a process that involves human diligence and compliance and is subject to lapses in judgment and breakdowns resulting from human failures. Internal control over financial reporting also can be circumvented by collusion or improper management override. Because of such limitations, there is a risk that material misstatements may not be prevented or detected on a timely basis by internal control over financial reporting. However, these inherent limitations are known features of the financial reporting process. Therefore, it is possible to design into the process safeguards to reduce, though not eliminate, this risk.

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal Proceedings

Item 1A. Risk Factors

There have been no material changes in our risk factors from those disclosed in our 2012 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

The following shares of stock were withheld for state and federal payroll taxes on the vesting of employee stock awards, as permitted under the 2012 Incentive Award Plan of Realty Income Corporation:

· 6,837 shares of stock, at a price of $49.67, during April 2013; and

· 5,133 shares of stock, at a price of $52.03, during May 2013.

Item 6. Exhibits

Exhibit No. Description

Articles of Incorporation and By-Laws

2.1 Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of September 6, 2012, by and among Realty Income Corporation, Tau Acquisition LLC and American Realty Capital Trust, Inc. (filed as exhibit 2.1 to the Company’s Form 8-K, filed on September 6, 2012 and incorporated herein by reference).

Table of Contents

2.2 First Amendment to Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of January 6, 2013, by and among Realty Income Corporation, Tau Acquisition LLC and American Realty Capital Trust, Inc. (filed as exhibit 2.1 to the Company’s Form 8-K, filed on January 7, 2013 and incorporated herein by reference).

3.1 Articles of Incorporation of the Company, as amended by amendment No. 1 dated May 10, 2005 and amendment No. 2 dated May 10, 2005 (filed as exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2005 and incorporated herein by reference), amendment No. 3 dated July 29, 2011 (filed as exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Form 8-K, filed on August 2, 2011 and incorporated herein by reference); and amendment No. 4 dated June 21, 2012 (filed as exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Form 8-K, filed on June 21, 2012 and incorporated herein by reference).

3.2 Amended and Restated Bylaws of the Company dated December 12, 2007 (filed as exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Form 8-K, filed on December 13, 2007 and incorporated herein by reference), as amended on May 13, 2008 (filed as exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Form 8-K, filed on May 14, 2008 and incorporated herein by reference), February 7, 2012 (filed as exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Form 8-K, filed on February 13, 2012 and incorporated herein by reference), February 21, 2012 (filed as exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Form 8-K, filed on February 22, 2012 and incorporated herein by reference), and March 13, 2013 (filed as exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Form 8-K, filed on March 14, 2013 and incorporated herein by reference).

3.3 Articles Supplementary to the Articles of Incorporation of the Company classifying and designating the 6.75% Monthly Income Class E Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock, dated November 30, 2006 (filed as exhibit 3.5 to the Company’s Form 8-A, filed on December 5, 2006 and incorporated herein by reference).

3.4 Articles Supplementary to the Articles of Incorporation of the Company classifying and designating the 6.625% Monthly Income Class F Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock, dated February 3, 2012 (the “First Class F Articles Supplementary”) (filed as exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Form 8-K, filed on February 3, 2012 and incorporated herein by reference).

3.5 Certificate of Correction to the First Class F Articles Supplementary, dated April 11, 2012 (filed as exhibit 3.2 to the Company’s Form 8-K, filed on April 17, 2012 and incorporated herein by reference).

3.6 Articles Supplementary to the Articles of Incorporation of the Company classifying and designating additional shares of the 6.625% Monthly Income Class F Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock, dated April 17, 2012 (filed as exhibit 3.3 to the Company’s Form 8-K, filed on April 17, 2012 and incorporated herein by reference).

Instruments defining the rights of security holders, including indentures

4.1 Indenture dated as of October 28, 1998 between the Company and The Bank of New York (filed as exhibit 4.1 to the Company’s Form 8-K, filed on October 28, 1998 and incorporated herein by reference).

4.2 Form of 5.50% Senior Notes due 2015 (filed as exhibit 4.2 to the Company’s Form 8-K, filed on November 24, 2003 and incorporated herein by reference).

Table of Contents

4.3 Officers’ Certificate pursuant to sections 201, 301 and 303 of the Indenture dated October 28, 1998 between the Company and The Bank of New York, as Trustee, establishing a series of securities entitled 5.50% Senior Notes due 2015 (filed as exhibit 4.3 to the Company’s Form 8-K, filed on November 24, 2003 and incorporated herein by reference).

4.4 Form of 5.875% Senior Notes due 2035 (filed as exhibit 4.2 to the Company’s Form 8-K, filed on March 11, 2005 and incorporated herein by reference).

4.5 Officers’ Certificate pursuant to sections 201, 301 and 303 of the Indenture dated October 28, 1998 between the Company and The Bank of New York, as Trustee, establishing a series of securities entitled 5.875% Senior Debentures due 2035 (filed as exhibit 4.3 to the Company’s Form 8-K, filed on March 11, 2005 and incorporated herein by reference).

4.6 Form of 5.375% Senior Notes due 2017 (filed as exhibit 4.2 to the Company’s Form 8-K, filed on September 16, 2005 and incorporated herein by reference).

4.7 Officers’ Certificate pursuant to sections 201, 301 and 303 of the Indenture dated October 28, 1998 between the Company and The Bank of New York, as Trustee, establishing a series of securities entitled 5.375% Senior Notes due 2017 (filed as exhibit 4.3 to the Company’s Form 8-K, filed on September 16, 2005 and incorporated herein by reference).

4.8 Form of 5.95% Senior Notes due 2016 (filed as exhibit 4.2 to the Company’s Form 8-K, filed on September 18, 2006 and incorporated herein by reference).

4.9 Officers’ Certificate pursuant to sections 201, 301 and 303 of the Indenture dated October 28, 1998 between the Company and The Bank of New York, as Trustee, establishing a series of securities entitled 5.95% Senior Notes due 2016 (filed as exhibit 4.3 to the Company’s Form 8-K, filed on September 18, 2006 and incorporated herein by reference).

4.10 Form of 6.75% Notes due 2019 (filed as exhibit 4.2 to Company’s Form 8-K, filed on September 5, 2007 and incorporated herein by reference).

4.11 Officers’ Certificate pursuant to sections 201, 301 and 303 of the Indenture dated October 28, 1998 between the Company and The Bank of New York Trust Company, N.A., as Trustee, establishing a series of securities entitled 6.75% Senior Notes due 2019 (filed as exhibit 4.3 to the Company’s Form 8-K, filed on September 5, 2007 and incorporated herein by reference).

4.12 Form of 5.750% Notes due 2021 (filed as exhibit 4.2 to Company’s Form 8-K, filed on June 29, 2010 and incorporated herein by reference).

4.13 Officers’ Certificate pursuant to sections 201, 301 and 303 of the Indenture dated October 28, 1998 between the Company and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as Successor Trustee, establishing a series of securities entitled 5.750% Notes due 2021 (filed as exhibit 4.3 to the Company’s Form 8-K, filed on June 29, 2010 and incorporated herein by reference).

4.14 Form of Common Stock Certificate (filed as exhibit 4.16 to the Company’s Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2011 and incorporated herein by reference).

Table of Contents

4.15 Form of Preferred Stock Certificate representing the 6.75% Monthly Income Class E Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock (filed as exhibit 4.1 to the Company’s Form 8-A, filed on December 5, 2006 and incorporated herein by reference).

4.16 Form of Preferred Stock Certificate representing the 6.625% Monthly Income Class F Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock (filed as exhibit 4.1 to the Company’s Form 8-K, filed on February 3, 2012 and incorporated herein by reference).

4.17 Officers’ Certificate pursuant to sections 201, 301 and 303 of the Indenture dated October 28, 1998 between the Company and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as successor trustee, establishing a series of securities entitled “2.000% Notes due 2018” and establishing a series of securities entitled “3.250% Notes due 2022” (filed as exhibit 4.4 to the Company’s Form 8-K, filed on October 10, 2012 and incorporated herein by reference).

4.18 Form of 2.000% Note due 2018 (filed as exhibit 4.2 to Company’s Form 8-K, filed on October 10, 2012 and incorporated herein by reference).

4.19 Form of 3.250% Note due 2022 (filed as exhibit 4.3 to Company’s Form 8-K, filed on October 10, 2012 and incorporated herein by reference).

4.20 Officers’ Certificate pursuant to sections 201, 301 and 303 of the Indenture dated October 28, 1998 between the Company and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as successor trustee, establishing a series of securities entitled “4.650% Notes due 2023” (filed as exhibit 4.3 to the Company’s Form 8-K, filed on July 16, 2013 and incorporated herein by reference).

4.21 Form of 4.650% Note due 2023 (filed as exhibit 4.2 to Company’s Form 8-K, filed on July 16, 2013 and incorporated herein by reference).

Material Contracts

10.1 The First Amendment to Amended and Restated Credit Agreement among the Company, as Borrower, each of the Lenders party thereto and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Administrative Agent (filed as exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Form 8-K, filed on June 3, 2013 and incorporated herein by reference).

10.2 Form of Amendment to Employment Agreement (filed as exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Form 8-K, filed on June 19, 2013 and incorporated herein by reference).

10.3 Form of Addendum to Restricted Stock Agreement (filed as exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Form 8-K, filed on June 19, 2013 and incorporated herein by reference).

Certifications

* 31.1 Rule 13a-14(a) Certifications as filed by the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to SEC release No. 33-8212 and 34-47551.

* 31.2 Rule 13a-14(a) Certifications as filed by the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to SEC release No. 33-8212 and 34-47551.

* 32 Section 1350 Certifications as furnished by the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to SEC release No. 33-8212 and 34-47551.

Table of Contents

Interactive Data Files

* 101 The following materials from Realty Income Corporation’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2013, formatted in Extensible Business Reporting Language: (i) Consolidated Balance Sheets, (ii) Consolidated Statements of Income, (iii) Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, and (iv) Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

* Filed herewith

SIGNATURE

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

	REALTY INCOME CORPORATION

Date: July 25, 2013	/s/ GREGORY J. FAHEY
	Gregory J. Fahey
	Senior Vice President, Controller
	(Principal Accounting Officer)