No. 812-13603
U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
AMENDMENT
NO. 3 TO
APPLICATION FOR AN ORDER PURSUANT TO SECTIONS 57(c) AND 57(i) OF THE
INVESTMENT COMPANY ACT OF 1940, AND RULE 17d-1 UNDER THE ACT TO PERMIT
CERTAIN JOINT TRANSACTIONS OTHERWISE PROHIBITED BY SECTIONS 57(a)(2) AND
57(a)(4) OF THE ACT AND UNDER SECTION 17(d) OF THE ACT AND RULE 17d-l UNDER THE
ACT AUTHORIZING CERTAIN JOINT TRANSACTIONS.
ARES CAPITAL CORPORATION, ARES CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LLC, ARES MANAGEMENT LLC, ARES MANAGEMENT LIMITED, ARES MANAGEMENT, L.P., ARES MANAGEMENT II, L.P., ARES INSTITUTIONAL LOAN FUND GP, LLC, ARES CLO MANAGEMENT IIR, L.P., ARES CLO MANAGEMENT IIIR/IVR, L.P., ARES CLO MANAGEMENT VR, L.P., ARES CLO MANAGEMENT VIR, L.P., ARES CLO MANAGEMENT VII, L.P., ARES CLO MANAGEMENT VIII, L.P., ARES CLO MANAGEMENT IX, L.P., ARES CLO MANAGEMENT X, L.P., ARES CLO MANAGEMENT XI, L.P., ARES CLO MANAGEMENT XII, L.P., ARES NF CLO XIII MANAGEMENT, L.P., ARES NF CLO XIV MANAGEMENT, L.P., ARES NF CLO XV MANAGEMENT, L.P., ARES ENHANCED LOAN MANAGEMENT, L.P., ARES ENHANCED LOAN MANAGEMENT IR, L.P., ARES ENHANCED LOAN MANAGEMENT IR-B, L.P., ARES ENHANCED LOAN MANAGEMENT II, L.P., ARES ENHANCED LOAN MANAGEMENT III, L.P., ARES ENHANCED LOAN INVESTMENT STRATEGY ADVISOR IV, L.P., ASSF OPERATING MANAGER II, LLC, ASSF MANAGEMENT II, L.P., ARES SPC HOLDINGS, L.P., ARES SPC HOLDINGS GP LLC, ARES HIGH YIELD CSO MANAGEMENT, L.P., ARES HIGH YIELD CSO MANAGEMENT II, L.P., ARES PRIVATE ACCOUNT MANAGEMENT I, L.P., ARES ENHANCED CREDIT OPPORTUNITIES GP, LLC, ARES ENHANCED CREDIT OPPORTUNITIES FUND MANAGEMENT, L.P., ASSF OPERATING MANAGER, LLC, ARES CSF OPERATING MANAGER I, LLC, ARES CSF OPERATING MANAGER II, LLC, ACOF OPERATING MANAGER, L.P., ACOF OPERATING MANAGER II, L.P., ACOF OPERATING MANAGER III, LLC, ARES CAPITAL EURO GP, L.P., ARES STRATEGIC INVESTMENT GP, LLC, ARES STRATEGIC INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT LLC, ARES ASIA MANAGEMENT, LTD., ARES ASIA MANAGEMENT (HK), LIMITED, IVY HILL ASSET MANAGEMENT L.P., IHSM LLC, ACKB LLC, A.C. CORPORATION, ARES LEVERAGED INVESTMENT FUND (U.S.), L.P., ARES LEVERAGED INVESTMENT FUND (CAYMAN), L.P., ARES LEVERAGED INVESTMENT FUND, L.P., ARES LEVERAGED INVESTMENT CORP., ARES LEVERAGED INVESTMENT FUND II, L.P., ARES LEVERAGED INVESTMENT CORP. II, ARES INSTITUTIONAL OFFSHORE LOAN FUND, B.V., ARES INSTITUTIONAL LOAN FUND, L.P., ARES INSTITUTIONAL LOAN FUND B.V., ARES IIR CLO LTD., ARES III CLO LTD., ARES IIIR/IVR CLO LTD., ARES V CLO LTD., ARES VR CLO LTD., ARES VI CLO LTD., ARES VIR CLO LTD., ARES VII CLO LTD., ARES VIII CLO LTD., ARES IX CLO LTD., ARES X CLO LTD., ARES XI CLO LTD., ARES XII CLO LTD., ARES EURO CLO I B.V., ARES EUROPEAN CLO II B.V., ARES NF CLO XIII LTD., ARES NF CLO XIV LTD., ARES NF CLO XV LTD., ARES ENHANCED LOAN INVESTMENT STRATEGY, LTD., ARES ENHANCED LOAN INVESTMENT STRATEGY IR LTD., ARES ENHANCED LOAN INVESTMENT STRATEGY IR-B, LTD., ARES ENHANCED LOAN INVESTMENT STRATEGY II LTD., ARES ENHANCED LOAN INVESTMENT STRATEGY III, LTD., ARES ENHANCED LOAN INVESTMENT STRATEGY III EURO B.V., ARES ENHANCED LOAN INVESTMENT STRATEGY V B.V., ARES ENHANCED LOAN INVESTMENT STRATEGY VI, L.P., ARES SPC LUXEMBOURG S.À.R.L., ARES HIGH YIELD CSO I PLC, ARES HIGH YIELD CSO LTD., CONFLUENT 2 LIMITED, ARES ENHANCED CREDIT OPPORTUNITIES FUND, L.P., ARES ENHANCED CREDIT
OPPORTUNITIES OFFSHORE FUND, LTD., ARES ENHANCED CREDIT OPPORTUNITIES MASTER FUND, L.P., ARES ENHANCED CREDIT OPPORTUNITIES FUND LTD., GLOBAL LOAN OPPORTUNITIES FUND B.V., ARES SPECIAL SITUATIONS FUND, L.P., DF US BD HOLDINGS LLC, ARES SPECIAL SITUATIONS FUND I-B, L.P., DF US BD HOLDINGS I-B LLC, ARES CREDIT STRATEGIES FUND I, L.P., ARES CREDIT STRATEGIES FUND II, L.P., ARES CORPORATE OPPORTUNITIES FUND, L.P., ARES CORPORATE OPPORTUNITIES FUND II, L.P., ARES CORPORATE OPPORTUNITIES FUND III, L.P., AF I US BD HOLDINGS L.P., AF II US BD HOLDINGS L.P., AF III US BD HOLDINGS L.P., ARES CAPITAL EUROPE LIMITED, ARES CAPITAL EUROPEAN INVESTMENTS LIMITED, ARES CAPITAL EUROPE, L.P., ARES CAPITAL EUROPE (LUXEMBOURG) S.À.R.L., ARES STRATEGIC INVESTMENT PARTNERS LTD., ARES STRATEGIC INVESTMENT PARTNERS OFFSHORE LTD., ARES STRATEGIC INVESTMENT PARTNERS EUROPE B.V., ARES STRATEGIC INVESTMENT PARTNERS, L.P., ARES CORPORATE OPPORTUNITIES FUND ASIA, L.P., IVY HILL MIDDLE MARKET CREDIT FUND, LTD., IVY HILL MIDDLE MARKET CREDIT FUND II, LTD., IVY HILL SENIOR DEBT FUND, L.P., IVY HILL SENIOR DEBT FUNDING 2007-1, IVY HILL SENIOR DEBT FUND, LTD., COLTS 2005-1 LTD., COLTS 2005-2 LTD., COLTS 2007-1 LTD., FIRSTLIGHT FUNDING I, LTD., KNIGHTSBRIDGE CLO 2007-1 LIMITED, KNIGHTSBRIDGE CLO 2008-1 LIMITED, EMPORIA PREFERRED FUNDING I, LTD., EMPORIA PREFERRED FUNDING II, LTD., EMPORIA PREFERRED FUNDING III, LTD., AGILE FUND I, LLC
280
Park Avenue, 22nd Floor
Building East
New York, NY 10017
and
2000
Avenue of the Stars, 12th Floor
Los Angeles, CA 90067
All Communications, Notices and Orders to:
Michael J. Arougheti President Ares Capital Corporation 280 Park Avenue, 22nd Floor Building East New York, NY 10017 (212) 750-7300 |
Michael D. Weiner General Counsel Ares Management LLC 2000 Avenue of the Stars, 12th Floor Los Angeles, CA 90067 (310) 201-4200 |
Joshua M. Bloomstein General Counsel Ares Capital Corporation 280 Park Avenue, 22nd Floor Building East New York, NY 10017 (212) 750-7300 |
Copies to:
Monica Shilling Proskauer Rose LLP 2049 Century Park East, 32nd Floor Los Angeles, CA 90067 (310) 557-2900 |
Steven B. Boehm Sutherland Asbill & Brennan LLP 1275 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20004 (202) 383-0100 |
August 23, 2010
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Before the
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
In the Matter of: | ) | |||
ARES CAPITAL CORPORATION, ARES | ) | |||
CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LLC, ARES | ) | |||
MANAGEMENT LLC, ARES MANAGEMENT | ) | |||
LIMITED, ARES MANAGEMENT, L.P., ARES MANAGEMENT II, L.P., ARES INSTITUTIONAL LOAN FUND GP, LLC, ARES CLO MANAGEMENT IIR, L.P., ARES CLO MANAGEMENT IIIR/IVR, L.P., ARES CLO MANAGEMENT VR, L.P., ARES CLO MANAGEMENT VIR, L.P., ARES CLO MANAGEMENT VII, L.P., ARES CLO MANAGEMENT VIII, L.P., ARES CLO MANAGEMENT IX, L.P., ARES CLO MANAGEMENT X, L.P., ARES CLO MANAGEMENT XI, L.P., ARES CLO |
) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) |
AMENDMENT NO. 3 TO APPLICATION FOR AN ORDER PURSUANT TO SECTIONS 57(c) AND 57(i) OF THE INVESTMENT COMPANY ACT OF 1940 AND RULE 17d-1 UNDER THE ACT AUTHORIZING CERTAIN JOINT TRANSACTIONS OTHERWISE PROHIBITED BY SECTIONS 57(a)(2) AND 57(a)(4) OF THE ACT AND UNDER SECTION 17(d) OF THE ACT AND RULE 17d-l UNDER THE ACT AUTHORIZING CERTAIN JOINT TRANSACTIONS. | ||
MANAGEMENT XII, L.P., ARES NF CLO XIII | ) | |||
MANAGEMENT, L.P., ARES NF CLO XIV | ) | |||
MANAGEMENT, L.P., ARES NF CLO XV | ) | |||
MANAGEMENT, L.P., ARES ENHANCED | ) | |||
LOAN MANAGEMENT, L.P., ARES | ) | |||
ENHANCED LOAN MANAGEMENT IR, L.P., | ) | |||
ARES ENHANCED LOAN MANAGEMENT | ) | |||
IR-B, L.P., ARES ENHANCED LOAN | ) | |||
MANAGEMENT II, L.P., ARES ENHANCED | ) | |||
LOAN MANAGEMENT III, L.P., ARES | ) | |||
ENHANCED LOAN INVESTMENT STRATEGY | ) | |||
ADVISOR IV, L.P., ASSF OPERATING | ) | |||
MANAGER II, LLC, ASSF MANAGEMENT II, | ) | |||
L.P., ARES SPC HOLDINGS, L.P., ARES SPC | ) | |||
HOLDINGS GP LLC, ARES HIGH YIELD CSO | ) | |||
MANAGEMENT, L.P., ARES HIGH YIELD CSO | ) | |||
MANAGEMENT II, L.P., ARES PRIVATE | ) | |||
ACCOUNT MANAGEMENT I, L.P., ARES | ) | |||
ENHANCED CREDIT OPPORTUNITIES GP, | ) | |||
LLC, ARES ENHANCED CREDIT | ) | |||
OPPORTUNITIES FUND MANAGEMENT, L.P., | ) | |||
ASSF OPERATING MANAGER, LLC, ARES | ) | |||
CSF OPERATING MANAGER I, LLC, ARES | ) | |||
CSF OPERATING MANAGER II, LLC, ACOF | ) | |||
OPERATING MANAGER, L.P., ACOF | ) | |||
OPERATING MANAGER II, L.P., ACOF | ) | |||
OPERATING MANAGER III, LLC, ARES | ) | |||
CAPITAL EURO GP, L.P., ARES STRATEGIC | ) | |||
INVESTMENT GP, LLC, ARES STRATEGIC | ) | |||
INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT LLC, ARES | ) | |||
ASIA MANAGEMENT, LTD., ARES ASIA | ) | |||
MANAGEMENT (HK), LIMITED, IVY HILL | ) |
ASSET MANAGEMENT L.P., IHSM LLC, ACKB | ) | |||
LLC, A.C. CORPORATION, ARES | ) | |||
LEVERAGED INVESTMENT FUND (U.S.), L.P., | ) | |||
ARES LEVERAGED INVESTMENT FUND | ) | |||
(CAYMAN), L.P., ARES LEVERAGED | ) | |||
INVESTMENT FUND, L.P., ARES LEVERAGED | ) | |||
INVESTMENT CORP., ARES LEVERAGED | ) | |||
INVESTMENT FUND II, L.P., ARES | ) | |||
LEVERAGED INVESTMENT CORP. II, ARES | ) | |||
INSTITUTIONAL OFFSHORE LOAN FUND, | ) | |||
B.V., ARES INSTITUTIONAL LOAN FUND, | ) | |||
L.P., ARES INSTITUTIONAL LOAN FUND B.V., | ) | |||
ARES IIR CLO LTD., ARES III CLO LTD., | ) | |||
ARES IIIR/IVR CLO LTD., ARES V CLO LTD., | ) | |||
ARES VR CLO LTD., ARES VI CLO LTD., ARES | ) | |||
VIR CLO LTD., ARES VII CLO LTD., ARES VIII | ) | |||
CLO LTD., ARES IX CLO LTD., ARES X CLO | ) | |||
LTD., ARES XI CLO LTD., ARES XII CLO LTD., | ) | |||
ARES EURO CLO I B.V., ARES EUROPEAN | ) | |||
CLO II B.V., ARES NF CLO XIII LTD., ARES NF | ) | |||
CLO XIV LTD., ARES NF CLO XV LTD., ARES | ) | |||
ENHANCED LOAN INVESTMENT STRATEGY, | ) | |||
LTD., ARES ENHANCED LOAN INVESTMENT | ) | |||
STRATEGY IR LTD., ARES ENHANCED LOAN | ) | |||
INVESTMENT STRATEGY IR-B, LTD., ARES | ) | |||
ENHANCED LOAN INVESTMENT STRATEGY | ) | |||
II LTD., ARES ENHANCED LOAN | ) | |||
INVESTMENT STRATEGY III, LTD., ARES | ) | |||
ENHANCED LOAN INVESTMENT STRATEGY | ) | |||
III EURO B.V., ARES ENHANCED LOAN | ) | |||
INVESTMENT STRATEGY V B.V., ARES | ) | |||
ENHANCED LOAN INVESTMENT STRATEGY | ) | |||
VI, L.P., ARES SPC LUXEMBOURG S.À.R.L., | ) | |||
ARES HIGH YIELD CSO I PLC, ARES HIGH | ) | |||
YIELD CSO LTD., CONFLUENT 2 LIMITED, | ) | |||
ARES ENHANCED CREDIT OPPORTUNITIES | ) | |||
FUND, L.P., ARES ENHANCED CREDIT | ) | |||
OPPORTUNITIES OFFSHORE FUND, LTD., | ) | |||
ARES ENHANCED CREDIT OPPORTUNITIES | ) | |||
MASTER FUND, L.P., ARES ENHANCED | ) | |||
CREDIT OPPORTUNITIES FUND LTD., | ) | |||
GLOBAL LOAN OPPORTUNITIES FUND B.V., | ) | |||
ARES SPECIAL SITUATIONS FUND, L.P., DF | ) | |||
US BD HOLDINGS LLC, ARES SPECIAL | ) | |||
SITUATIONS FUND I-B, L.P., DF US BD | ) | |||
HOLDINGS I-B LLC, ARES CREDIT | ) |
STRATEGIES FUND I, L.P., ARES CREDIT | ) | |||
STRATEGIES FUND II, L.P., ARES | ) | |||
CORPORATE OPPORTUNITIES FUND, L.P., | ) | |||
ARES CORPORATE OPPORTUNITIES FUND | ) | |||
II, L.P., ARES CORPORATE OPPORTUNITIES | ) | |||
FUND III, L.P., AF I US BD HOLDINGS L.P., AF | ) | |||
II US BD HOLDINGS L.P., AF III US BD | ) | |||
HOLDINGS L.P., ARES CAPITAL EUROPE | ) | |||
LIMITED, ARES CAPITAL EUROPEAN | ) | |||
INVESTMENTS LIMITED, ARES CAPITAL | ) | |||
EUROPE, L.P., ARES CAPITAL EUROPE | ) | |||
(LUXEMBOURG) S.À.R.L., ARES STRATEGIC | ) | |||
INVESTMENT PARTNERS LTD., ARES | ) | |||
STRATEGIC INVESTMENT PARTNERS | ) | |||
OFFSHORE LTD., ARES STRATEGIC | ) | |||
INVESTMENT PARTNERS EUROPE B.V., | ) | |||
ARES STRATEGIC INVESTMENT PARTNERS, | ) | |||
L.P., ARES CORPORATE OPPORTUNITIES | ) | |||
FUND ASIA, L.P., IVY HILL MIDDLE MARKET | ) | |||
CREDIT FUND, LTD., IVY HILL MIDDLE | ) | |||
MARKET CREDIT FUND II, LTD., IVY HILL | ) | |||
SENIOR DEBT FUND, L.P., IVY HILL SENIOR | ) | |||
DEBT FUNDING 2007-1, IVY HILL SENIOR | ) | |||
DEBT FUND, LTD., COLTS 2005-1 LTD., COLTS | ) | |||
2005-2 LTD., COLTS 2007-1 LTD., FIRSTLIGHT | ) | |||
FUNDING I, LTD., KNIGHTSBRIDGE CLO | ) | |||
2007-1 LIMITED, KNIGHTSBRIDGE CLO 2008- | ) | |||
1 LIMITED, EMPORIA PREFERRED FUNDING | ) | |||
I, LTD., EMPORIA PREFERRED FUNDING II, | ) | |||
LTD., EMPORIA PREFERRED FUNDING III, | ) | |||
LTD., AGILE FUND I, LLC | ) | |||
) | ||||
280 Park Avenue, 22nd Floor | ) | |||
Building East | ) | |||
New York, NY 10017 | ) | |||
(212) 750-7300 | ) | |||
) | ||||
File No. 812-13603 | ) | |||
Investment Company Act of 1940 |
The following entities hereby request an order (the "Order") of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Commission") pursuant to Sections 57(c) and 57(i) of the Investment Company Act of 1940 (the "Act"), 1 and Rule 17d-l promulgated under the Act,2 authorizing certain joint transactions that otherwise may be prohibited by Sections 57(a)(2) and 57(a)(4):
1
2
ACM, the "Applicants").
3
In particular, the relief requested in this application (the "Application") would allow ARCC, the Ivy Hill Funds, the CoLTS Funds, FirstLight, the Knightsbridge Funds, the Emporia Funds, AGILE Fund and any other investment fund that ARCC or Ivy Hill Management (or any entity directly or indirectly controlled by ARCC or Ivy Hill Management within the meaning of Section 2(a)(9)) may in the future sponsor or provide investment management services to, as well as any other vehicles5 that currently exist or may be established in the future that may invest on a side-by-side basis therewith or make an investment in lieu thereof for tax, legal or regulatory purposes to effect transactions with or on behalf of a Downstream Managed Fund (collectively, the "Future Downstream Managed Funds" and, together with the Ivy Hill Funds, the CoLTS Funds, FirstLight, the Knightsbridge Funds, the Emporia Funds and AGILE Fund, the "Downstream Managed Funds," and the Downstream Managed Funds together with ARCC, the "ARCC Funds"), on the one hand, and the Existing Affiliated Funds, and any current or future entities that Ares Management, ACM or an affiliated person (as defined in Section 2(a)(3)(C) of the Act ("Affiliate")) (other than A.C. Corp., Ivy Hill Management or any other investment manager that ARCC may in the future directly or indirectly control) of either may in the future sponsor or provide investment management services to, as well as any other vehicles6 that currently exist or may be established in the future that may invest on a side-by-side basis therewith or make an investment in lieu thereof for tax, legal or regulatory purposes to effect financing transactions with or on behalf of an Affiliated Fund (each a "Future Affiliated Fund" and together with the Existing Affiliated Funds, the "Affiliated Funds"), on the other hand, to co-invest in the same investment opportunities where such investment would otherwise be prohibited under the Act (collectively, "Co-Investment Transactions").
All existing entities that currently intend to rely on the Order have been named as Applicants and any existing or future entities that may rely on the Order in the future will comply with its terms and conditions.
4
A. ARES CAPITAL CORPORATION
ARCC is a specialty finance company that is a closed-end, non-diversified management investment company incorporated in Maryland. ARCC has elected to be regulated as a business development company ("BDC") under the Act.7 In addition, ARCC has qualified and elected to be treated as a regulated investment company ("RIC") under Subchapter M of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (the "Code") and intends to continue to qualify as a RIC in the future. ARCC's principal place of business is 280 Park Avenue, 22nd Floor, Building East, New York, NY 10017. In connection with its initial public offering, ARCC filed a registration statement on Form N-2 (File No. 333-114656) under the Securities Act of 1933. ARCC completed an initial public offering of its common stock, par value $0.001, on October 8, 2004 and has raised additional capital through subsequent equity offerings from time to time.
ARCC's investment objective is to generate both current income and capital appreciation through debt and equity investments. ARCC invests primarily in U.S. middle market companies, where it believes the supply of primary capital is limited and investment opportunities are most attractive. ARCC invests primarily in first and second lien senior loans and mezzanine debt, which in some cases includes an equity component like warrants. To a lesser extent, ARCC makes equity investments. In addition, ARCC has the ability to provide "one stop" financing with the ability to invest capital across the balance sheet and hold larger investments than many of its competitors. The ability to underwrite, syndicate and hold larger investments benefits ARCC's shareholders by: (i) increasing originated deal flow flexibility, (ii) potentially increasing net income to ARCC and earnings for ARCC through syndication, (iii) broadening market relationships and deal flow, (iv) allowing ARCC to optimize its portfolio composition and (v) allowing ARCC to provide capital to middle market companies, which ARCC believes currently have limited access to capital from traditional lending sources.
ARCC's business and affairs are managed under the direction of a board of directors (the "Board"). The Board currently consists of nine members, five of whom are not "interested persons" of ARCC as defined in Section 2(a)(19) of the Act (the "Independent Directors"). The Board has delegated daily management and investment authority to ACM pursuant to an investment advisory and management agreement (the "Investment Advisory Agreement"). Ares Operations LLC ("Ares Administration") serves as ARCC's administrator pursuant to an administration agreement.
B. IVY HILL MANAGEMENT, A.C. CORP. AND THE DOWNSTREAM MANAGED FUNDS
ARCC's indirect wholly owned portfolio company, Ivy Hill Management, a Delaware limited partnership, manages the investment and reinvestment of the assets of the Downstream Managed Funds (other than the Emporia Funds, which are managed by A.C. Corp., and AGILE Fund, which is managed by ARCC). A.C. Corp. is a Delaware corporation. Neither A.C. Corp. nor Ivy Hill Management is registered under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 because they have had fewer than 15 clients during the course of the preceding 12 months.
Ivy Hill I and Ivy Hill II are unconsolidated middle market credit funds. Ivy Hill I primarily invests in first and second lien bank debt of middle market companies. Ivy Hill I was initially funded in November 2007 with $404.0 million of capital including a $56.0 million investment by ARCC consisting of $40.0 million of Class B notes and $16.0 million of subordinated notes.
5
On November 5, 2008, ARCC established a second unconsolidated middle market credit fund, Ivy Hill II. Ivy Hill II primarily invests in first and second lien and subordinated bank debt of middle market companies. Ivy Hill II was initially funded with $125.0 million of subordinated notes, and may grow over time with leverage.
In December 2009, Ivy Hill Management acquired Allied Capital Corporation's management rights in respect of, and interests in, the Allied Capital Senior Debt Fund, L.P. (now referred to as Ivy Hill Senior Debt Fund, L.P. or "Ivy Hill SDF"), for approximately $33 million in cash. As of June 30, 2010, Ivy Hill SDF had approximately $252 million of committed capital, which includes approximately $30 million committed by ARCC and Ivy Hill Management, invested primarily in first lien loans and, to a lesser extent, second lien loans of middle-market companies. In connection with such acquisition, Ivy Hill Management also acquired Allied Capital Corporation's management rights in respect of, and interests in, Ivy Hill Senior Debt Funding 2007-1 and Ivy Hill Senior Debt Fund, Ltd, which also invest, either directly or indirectly, primarily in first lien loans and, to a lesser extent, second lien loans of middle-market companies.
Ivy Hill SDF is a Delaware limited partnership and the other Ivy Hill Funds are Cayman Islands exempted companies with limited liability ("Cayman Companies").
The CoLTS Funds are also Cayman Companies and are managed by Ivy Hill Management pursuant to sub-management agreements with each CoLTS Fund's respective manager. Each CoLTS Fund invests in the debt and debt securities of middle market companies.
FirstLight is also a Cayman Company managed by Ivy Hill Management pursuant to a sub-management agreement with FirstLight's collateral manager. FirstLight invests in debt and debt securities of primarily middle market companies.
In March 2010, Ivy Hill Management acquired Allied Capital Corporation's management rights in respect of, and equity interests in, the Knightsbridge Funds. As of June 30, 2010, the Knightsbridge Funds had approximately $769 million of committed capital invested primarily in senior debt. The Knightsbridge Funds are Cayman Companies.
On April 1, 2010, ARCC completed its previously announced acquisition of Allied Capital Corporation. In connection with the acquisition; (i) A.C. Corp., the manager of the Emporia Funds, became a wholly owned subsidiary of ARCC; and (ii) ARCC assumed Allied Capital Corporation's management of AGILE Fund. The Emporia Funds are Cayman Companies and AGILE Fund is a Delaware limited liability company.
The Downstream Managed Funds all rely on Section 3(c)(7) for an exclusion from regulation under the Act. As of June 30, 2010, Ivy Hill Management had total committed capital under management of over $2.9 billion, which includes approximately $0.3 billion committed by ARCC.
C. ARES CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LLC AND ARES ADMINISTRATION
ACM, a Delaware limited liability company that is registered under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, serves as the investment adviser to ARCC pursuant to the Investment Advisory Agreement. Subject to the overall supervision of the Board, ACM manages the day-to-day operations of, and provides investment advisory and management services to, ARCC. Under the terms of the Investment Advisory Agreement, ACM determines the composition of ARCC's portfolio, the nature and timing of the changes to ARCC's portfolio and the manner of implementing such changes; identifies, evaluates and negotiates the structure of the investments ARCC makes (including performing due diligence on ARCC's prospective portfolio companies); closes and monitors the investments ARCC makes; and determines the investments and other assets that ARCC purchases, retains or sells.
6
Pursuant to the administration agreement, Ares Administration furnishes ARCC with office equipment and clerical, bookkeeping and record keeping services at ARCC's office facilities. Under the administration agreement, Ares Administration also performs, or oversees the performance of, ARCC's required administrative services, which include, among other things, providing assistance in accounting, legal, compliance, operations, technology and investor relations, being responsible for the financial records that ARCC is required to maintain and preparing reports to ARCC's shareholders and reports filed with the Commission. In addition, Ares Administration assists ARCC in determining and publishing ARCC's net asset value, oversees the preparation and filing of ARCC's tax returns and the printing and dissemination of reports to ARCC's shareholders, and generally oversees the payment of ARCC's expenses and the performance of administrative and professional services rendered to ARCC by others.
Both ACM and Ares Administration are wholly-owned direct subsidiaries of Ares Management LLC, which (either directly or through Affiliates) provide investment advisory services to the Affiliated Funds.
D. EXISTING AFFILIATED FUNDS
As described below, the Existing Affiliated Funds are categorized into three groups (although the groups do not represent formal legal entities). All of the Existing Affiliated Funds are managed by an Affiliated Investment Manager.
1. Capital Markets Group. The Ares Capital Markets Group currently manages the Existing Affiliated Funds and investment vehicles listed below that had in the aggregate approximately $18 billion of committed capital under management as of June 30, 2010, and focus primarily on syndicated senior secured loans, high yield bonds, distressed debt, other liquid fixed income investments and other publicly traded debt securities: Ares Leveraged Investment Fund (U.S.), L.P., Ares Leveraged Investment Fund (Cayman), L.P., Ares Leveraged Investment Fund, L.P., Ares Leveraged Investment Corp., Ares Leveraged Investment Fund II, L.P., Ares Leveraged Investment Corp. II, Ares Institutional Offshore Loan Fund, B.V., Ares Institutional Loan Fund, L.P., Ares Institutional Loan Fund B.V., Ares IIR CLO Ltd., Ares III CLO Ltd., Ares IIIR/IVR CLO Ltd., Ares IV CLO Ltd., Ares V CLO Ltd., Ares VR CLO Ltd., Ares VI CLO Ltd., Ares VIR CLO Ltd., Ares VII CLO Ltd., Ares VIII CLO Ltd., Ares IX CLO Ltd., Ares CLO X Ltd., Ares CLO XI Ltd., Ares CLO XII Ltd., Ares Euro CLO I B.V., Ares European CLO II B.V., Ares NF CLO XIII Ltd., Ares NF CLO XIV Ltd., Ares NF CLO XV Ltd., Ares Enhanced Loan Investment Strategy, Ltd., Ares Enhanced Loan Investment Strategy IR Ltd., Ares Enhanced Loan Investment Strategy IR-B, Ltd., Ares Enhanced Loan Investment Strategy II Ltd., Ares Enhanced Loan Investment Strategy III, Ltd., Ares Enhanced Loan Investment Strategy III Euro B.V., Ares Enhanced Loan Investment Strategy V, B.V., Ares Enhanced Loan Investment Strategy VI, L.P., Ares SPC Luxembourg S.À.R.L., Ares High Yield CSO I PLC, Ares High Yield CSO Ltd., Confluent 2 Limited, Ares Enhanced Credit Opportunities Fund L.P., Ares Enhanced Credit Opportunities Offshore Fund, Ltd., Ares Enhanced Credit Opportunities Master Fund, LP, Ares Enhanced Credit Opportunities Fund, Ltd., Ares Special Situations Fund, L.P., Global Loan Opportunities Fund B.V., DF US BD Holdings LLC, Ares Special Situations Fund I-B, L.P., DF US BD Holdings I-B LLC, Ares Credit Strategies Fund I, L.P., AF I US BD Holdings L.P., AF II US BD Holdings L.P., AF III US BD Holdings L.P., Ares Strategic Investment Partners Ltd., Ares Strategic Investment Partners Offshore Ltd., Ares Strategic Investment Partners Europe B.V., and Ares Strategic Investment Partners, L.P.
2. Private Debt Group. The Ares Private Debt Group focuses primarily on non-syndicated first and second lien senior loans and mezzanine debt, which in some cases may include an equity component, and currently manages the assets of: (i) ARCC, which, as of June 30, 2010, had approximately $12 billion of committed capital under management, including the Downstream Managed Funds and subject to leverage restrictions; (ii) Ares CSF II, which as of June 30, 2010, had $200 million
7
of committed capital under management and (iii) Ares' private debt middle-market financing activities in Europe, through the following subsidiaries of Ares Capital Europe, L.P. ("ACE LP"), which had approximately $1.0 billion of committed capital as of June 30, 2010: Ares Capital Europe Limited, Ares Capital European Investments Limited and Ares Capital Europe (Luxembourg) s.á.r.l. (collectively with ACE LP, "ACE"). The Ares Private Debt Group is a functional name that Ares uses to refer to one part of its business, which is conducted in part by ACM and Ivy Hill Management, and their respective employees and, in the case of ACE, by Ares Capital Europe Limited and its employees.
3. Private Equity Group. The Ares Private Equity Group generally focuses on control-oriented investments or investments in under-capitalized companies or companies with capital structure issues in amounts substantially larger than those made by ARCC and currently manages Ares Corporate Opportunities Fund L.P., Ares Corporate Opportunities Fund II, L.P. and Ares Corporate Opportunities Fund III, L.P. (collectively referred to as "ACOF") and Ares Corporate Opportunities Fund Asia, L.P., which together had approximately $6.0 billion of total committed capital under management as of June 30, 2010.
Each of the above Existing Affiliated Funds is a separate and distinct legal entity and each relies on the exemption from registration as an investment company under the Act provided by Section 3(c)(1) or 3(c)(7) of the Act.
In addition, each of the Existing Affiliated Funds is a Delaware limited partnership or Delaware corporation except for:
8
The ARCC Funds and the Affiliated Funds require relief to co-invest because ACM and the Affiliated Investment Managers are under the common control of Ares Management LLC.
A. OVERVIEW
Co-Investment Transactions involving one or more ARCC Funds, on the one hand, and one or more Affiliated Funds, on the other hand, arise in a number of scenarios, including Basic Co-Investment Transactions, Syndication Transactions, Joint Follow-On Transactions and Joint Exit Transactions, each of which is discussed below.
Generally, opportunities for Co-Investment Transactions arise from time to time when advisory personnel of ACM or Ares Management become aware of investment opportunities that may be appropriate for both an ARCC Fund and an Affiliated Fund. Upon issuance of the requested Order, in such cases, investment opportunities that are presented to an Affiliated Fund may be referred to an ARCC Fund and vice versa, and such investment opportunities may result in a Co-Investment Transaction. For each type of Co-Investment Transaction, a specific protocol applies, which is designed to ensure the fairness to the ARCC Fund of the specific type of Co-Investment Transaction.
B. BASIC CO-INVESTMENT TRANSACTIONS
A "Basic Co-Investment Transaction" occurs with regard to ARCC when, as described above, advisory personnel of ACM or Ares Management become aware of investment opportunities that may be appropriate for both ARCC and one or more Affiliated Fund and investment opportunities that are presented to an Affiliated Fund may be referred to ARCC and vice versa. For each such referral, ACM will independently analyze and evaluate the investment opportunity as to its appropriateness for ARCC. After ACM considers ARCC's investment objective and strategies, available funds, market conditions, regulatory requirements and other pertinent factors particular to ARCC (including applicable investment restrictions and the amount ARCC can invest in such investment), if it determines that the opportunity is appropriate for ARCC and an Affiliated Fund has confirmed its desire to also participate, ACM will forward the opportunity to ARCC's Board for consideration.8
With respect to Downstream Managed Funds, their respective investment managers will independently analyze and evaluate each investment opportunity referred to them by an Affiliated Fund. In connection with any type of Co-Investment Transaction between an Affiliated Fund, on the one hand, and a Downstream Managed Fund, on the other hand, the constituent documents for each of the Downstream Managed Funds require some form of independent approval of the transaction. Thus, each Downstream Managed Fund has a transaction committee or an advisory committee with at least one member who is not affiliated with any ARCC Fund or Affiliated Fund or who is an individual (otherwise unaffiliated with the Downstream Managed Fund or Ares generally) engaged by the Downstream Managed Fund solely for the purpose of providing an independent role (an "Independent Party") with veto power over investments with Affiliated entities. All Co-Investment Transactions between a Downstream Managed Fund and an Affiliated Fund must be approved by the Downstream Managed Fund's Independent Party. For example, a Co-Investment Transaction between Ivy Hill I, on the one hand, and an Affiliated Fund, on the other hand, would require the approval of Ivy Hill I's Independent Party, i.e., the transaction committee of Ivy Hill I's board of directors, which includes the independent members of that board. Similarly, a Co-Investment Transaction between either of CoLTS 2005-2 Ltd. or CoLTS 2007-1 Ltd., on the
9
one hand, and an Affiliated Fund, on the other hand, would require the consent of a contractually specified Independent Party for CoLTS 2005-2 Ltd. or CoLTS 2007-1 Ltd., respectively. Thus, in a Basic Co-Investment Transaction, if the applicable investment manager determines that the opportunity is appropriate for the Downstream Managed Fund and an Affiliated Fund has confirmed its desire to also participate, the investment manager will forward the opportunity to the Downstream Managed Fund's Independent Party for consideration.
The Affiliated Funds and their managers will not be obligated to refer investment opportunities to the ARCC Funds, and the ARCC Funds will not be obligated to co-invest when investment opportunities are referred to them. Similarly, the ARCC Funds and their respective investment managers will not be obligated to refer investment opportunities to the Affiliated Funds, and the Affiliated Funds will not be obligated to co-invest when investment opportunities are referred to them. Nevertheless, it is expected that the ARCC Funds and the Affiliated Funds will participate in Co-Investment Transactions from time to time.
C. SYNDICATION TRANSACTIONS
1. General.
In the context of lending, "syndication" generally refers to an arrangement under which the amount to be borrowed by a prospective debtor in a specific financing transaction is to be allocated among more than one lender. A syndication is ordinarily led by a single lender, the "arranger," which distributes, or syndicates, portions of the loan to other members of the syndicate. The arranger may acquire the entire loan, as principal, and then sell portions of the loan to other participants in the syndicate. Alternatively, the arranger may acquire only its portion of the loan as a principal, and syndicate the remainder of the loan as agent of the borrower.
2. Types of Syndication Transactions.
Syndication Transactions (as defined below) arise with regard to ARCC when ACM becomes aware of investment opportunities that are appropriate for ARCC but are deemed to be too large (including by reason of ARCC's portfolio diversification standards) for ARCC to invest in by itself. In those transactions, ACM would make a determination to pursue an investment opportunity for ARCC without regard to the investment needs of the Affiliated Funds. Only to the extent that ARCC lacks the capacity to absorb the entire investment opportunity, or that ACM determines that it is in the best interest of ARCC to limit its exposure in a particular investment scenario, would other lenders be considered for the investment.
When ARCC determines to consider other lenders for an investment, ARCC may nonetheless, in some cases, commit to acquire or acquire the full amount of a debt issuance from the issuer and then syndicate a portion of it to others persons (a "Principal Syndication"), and in other cases, ARCC will act as lender and syndication arranger/agent, in which ARCC will make a loan to a borrower of less than the amount sought by the borrower and ARCC will obtain the balance of the loan by syndicating the balance to other persons (an "Agency Syndication" and collectively with Principal Syndications, "Syndication Transactions").9 A Downstream Managed Fund may also complete a Principal Syndication or an Agency Syndication.
In connection with a Syndication Transaction, an ARCC Fund may receive structuring or advisory income ("Loan Fees") in addition to making a principal investment. Loan Fees are normally paid to the ARCC Fund at the closing of the investment, are generally non-recurring and are recognized as revenue when earned upon closing of the investment. The services that the ARCC Fund's investment manager (ACM in the case of ARCC) provides vary by investment, but generally
10
consist of reviewing the target company's existing credit facilities, arranging bank financing, arranging equity financing, structuring financing from multiple lenders, structuring financing from multiple equity investors, restructuring existing loans, raising equity and debt capital, and providing general financial advice, which concludes upon closing of the investment. In certain instances where the ARCC Fund acts as agent in a transaction and does not provide significant services in connection with the investment, a portion of the Loan Fees paid to the ARCC Fund in such situations will be deferred and amortized over the estimated life of the loan. The ARCC Fund also generally receives commitment fees in an amount equal to a percentage of the capital committed by the ARCC Fund and these commitment fees are generally shared with third-party participants, including Affiliated Funds. The amount of such fees payable to third-party participants, including Affiliated Funds, may be based on prevailing market conditions, the creditworthiness of the borrower, the perceived risk of the investment and other relevant factors.
3. Ensuring fairness in Syndication Transactions.
Upon issuance of the requested Order, after considering ARCC's investment objective and strategies, available funds, market conditions, regulatory requirements and other pertinent factors particular to ARCC (including applicable investment restrictions, regulatory requirements and the amount ARCC can invest in such investments), if ACM determines that it is appropriate for ARCC to syndicate a portion of an investment opportunity to an Affiliated Fund, ACM will forward the syndication opportunity to ARCC's Board for consideration. Upon receiving Board approval, ARCC will complete a Principal Syndication or an Agency Syndication.
Downstream Managed Funds would also be able to participate in Syndication Transactions with Affiliated Funds to the extent that their respective Independent Parties approve such transactions.
D. RATIONALE FOR BASIC CO-INVESTMENT TRANSACTIONS AND SYNDICATION TRANSACTIONS
ARCC, the Downstream Managed Funds and Ares CSF II are currently the only investment vehicles sponsored by Ares Management or ACM that focus primarily on investments in illiquid first and second lien senior loans and mezzanine debt in U.S. private companies. ACM's services to ARCC under the investment advisory and management agreement are not exclusive and, accordingly, it may, consistent with its applicable fiduciary duties, furnish similar services to other entities, including entities with investment objectives similar to ARCC's investment objective.
Though the primary investment focus of the ARCC Funds is currently different from that of the Affiliated Funds (other than Ares CSF II, which primarily acquires mezzanine debt of middle market companies, and ACE, which primarily acquires debt of non-U.S. companies), there nonetheless may be investment opportunities appropriate for, and that meet the investment objectives of, both an ARCC Fund and one or more of the Affiliated Funds. For example, while the Existing Affiliated Funds (other than ACE and Ares CSF II) that acquire senior debt primarily acquire syndicated or liquid debt, they may, on occasion, acquire illiquid debt in private companies. In addition, as noted above, from time to time ARCC will act as an agent on a particular credit facility, committing to all of the debt but syndicating some of its exposure to other lenders and receiving income in addition to making an investment in a portfolio company's debt. The ability to syndicate a portion of such debt or commitments to Affiliated Funds would give ARCC greater flexibility to pursue transactions where ARCC could act as agent in concert with making an investment consistent with ARCC's investment objective and would give ARCC more opportunities to provide capital to middle market companies, which ARCC believes currently have limited access to capital from traditional lending sources. Depending on prevailing market conditions, it would also result in increased income to ARCC, a wider universe of investment opportunities and a greater ability to structure deal terms that are favorable to ARCC. All of these benefits would, in turn, enhance value for ARCC's shareholders without exposing them to the types of abuses sought to be remedied by Section 57(a).
11
Indeed, ARCC's inability to co-invest with the Existing Affiliated Funds could potentially result in the loss of beneficial investment opportunities for ARCC and, in turn, adversely affect ARCC's shareholders. For example, ARCC may lose some investment opportunities where it cannot provide "one-stop" financing to potential portfolio companies. In addition, the Code imposes diversification requirements on companies, such as ARCC, that seek certain favorable tax treatment under Subchapter M of the Code, and, consequently, in some circumstances ARCC might not be able to commit to the entire amount of financing sought by a potential portfolio company. Companies would likely reject an offer of funding by ARCC due to ARCC's inability to commit the full amount of financing required by the company in a timely manner (i.e., without the delay that typically would be associated with obtaining single-transaction exemptive relief from the Commission). By reducing the number of occasions on which ARCC's investment limits require ACM to arrange a syndication with unaffiliated entities, ARCC would likely have to forego fewer appropriate investment opportunities, i.e., the ability of ARCC to co-invest with Affiliated Funds will increase the number of investment opportunities accessible to ARCC.
Current credit market conditions have led to a decline in the availability of capital, thereby creating more opportunities for ARCC to make investments consistent with its investment objective and allowing ARCC to focus on transactions where its competitive advantages are strongest. The ability to commit larger amounts of financing to portfolio companies in a co-investment situation would give ARCC greater flexibility to make larger financing commitments, which would, among other things, increase income and provide better access to due diligence information for ARCC. In addition, increasing the opportunities available to ARCC with a co-investment structure would generate greater deal flow, broaden the market relationships of ARCC and allow ARCC to be more selective in choosing its investments so that ARCC can pursue the most attractive risk-adjusted investments and optimize its portfolio. Enhanced selectivity and more favorable deal terms, pricing and structure would also likely lead to closer relationships between portfolio companies and ARCC, all of which should create enhanced value for shareholders of ARCC without exposing them to the types of abuses sought to be remedied by Section 57(a).
The Board believes that ARCC's investment adviser, ACM, is able to leverage the current investment platform, resources and existing relationships with financial sponsors, financial institutions, hedge funds and other investment firms of Ares Management and its affiliated companies (collectively, "Ares") to provide ARCC with attractive investment opportunities. In addition to deal flow, the Ares investment platform assists ACM in analyzing, structuring and monitoring investments. Ares' senior principals have worked together for over 11 years and have an average of over 20 years experience investing in senior loans, high yield bonds, mezzanine debt and private equity securities. ARCC has access to the Ares staff of approximately 140 investment professionals and to the approximately 190 administrative professionals employed by Ares who provide assistance in accounting, legal, compliance, operations, technology and investor relations. The ability to co-invest with the Affiliated Funds on the terms and conditions outlined in this application would give ARCC the opportunity to more effectively leverage these resources and greater flexibility to pursue attractive investments that would otherwise have been unavailable to ARCC. This will benefit ARCC's shareholders while ensuring that any such co-investment transactions are "consistent with the provisions, policies, and purposes of the Act" and provide for participation by ARCC not "on a basis different from or less advantageous than that of other participants."
Ares Management and its controlled Affiliates that manage the Affiliated Funds are exposed to a large number of investment opportunities that could potentially be appropriate for and attractive to ARCC. Applicants believe that if ARCC were able to co-invest with the Affiliated Funds to the extent contemplated in this Application, ARCC could access potentially accretive investment opportunities that might not otherwise be available to it. In such cases, ACM would independently analyze the suitability of such potential investment vis-à-vis ARCC's investment objective and the state of its
12
investment portfolio at that time. Based on such analyses (performed separately for each such investment proposal), ACM would determine which opportunities are consistent with ARCC's investment objective and present such opportunities for the consideration of ARCC's Board in accordance with the terms of this Application.
In addition, ACM will present to ARCC's Board, on a quarterly basis, a record of all investments made by Affiliated Funds during the preceding quarter of which ACM personnel were aware that (i) fell within ARCC's then current investment objective and met certain criteria determined by ARCC's Board from time to time for the purpose of this reporting requirement related to the asset class, expected minimum rate of return, liquidity and size of the investment as well as any control or management rights available to ARCC and (ii) were not made available to ARCC, as well as an explanation of why the investment opportunities were not offered to ARCC. ARCC believes it is appropriate to set certain criteria related to asset class, minimum return, liquidity and size of investment as well as any control or management rights available to ARCC in connection with the provision of this information. Investment vehicles that are not subject to any leverage restrictions (like most of the Affiliated Funds) can pursue a lower return than what ARCC generally pursues given its leverage restrictions. The Affiliated Funds may also pursue investments with more liquidity, of a larger size or with less control over the portfolio company than ARCC generally pursues given its investment objective and BDC status. As discussed, co-investment is in the best interests of shareholders of ARCC, and maintaining the described parameters ensures that ARCC's Board will be able to focus only on those opportunities in which ARCC may actually choose to invest instead of being overwhelmed by information relating to other opportunities that would not be pursued by ARCC. Such criteria may change over time as markets and ARCC's available capital change, and as a result ARCC believes that, for purposes of this reporting requirement, ARCC's Board should set the parameters from time to time, depending on market conditions and ARCC's available capital.
The same rationale supporting ARCC's participation in Basic Co-Investment Transactions and Syndication Transactions also applies to participation by the Downstream Managed Funds in Basic Co-Investment Transactions and Syndication Transactions. Although the Downstream Managed Funds ordinarily will not have boards of directors in the traditional corporate sense or as contemplated under the Act, each Downstream Managed Fund has an Independent Party that will perform the same type of analyses and make the same types of determinations regarding a prospective Basic Co-Investment Transaction or Syndication Transaction as ARCC's Board would perform under the circumstances indicated above.
In addition to the foregoing, as described above, one or more ARCC Funds may also co-invest with the other ARCC Funds or with an Affiliated Fund. With respect to any Co-Investment Transaction among the ARCC Funds, no relief is required because the ARCC Funds' affiliation with each other results solely from ARCC's control of the Downstream Managed Funds. As a result, Co-Investment Transactions among the ARCC Funds would be exempt from the affiliated transaction prohibitions of Section 57(a) pursuant to Rule 57b-1.
E. JOINT FOLLOW-ON TRANSACTIONS AND JOINT EXIT TRANSACTIONS
1. Mechanics.
As a result of the expansion of the business of Ares and ARCC, there may be instances where an ARCC Fund and Affiliated Fund find themselves holding investments in the same portfolio company of the same or a different class, but where the respective acquisitions of those investments did not occur at the same time or otherwise implicate the joint transaction proscriptions of Section 57(a)(4). In these scenarios, no issue arose under Section 57 when the original investments were made, and it is possible that either or both funds may exit the investment or complete an additional investment in that portfolio company, consisting of a debt or equity investment or warrants, or the exercise of conversion privileges
13
or other similar rights to acquire additional securities of the issuer (any such additional investment, a "Follow-On Investment"), also without implicating Section 57(a), in which case relief of the type being sought in this Application would not be required. If, however, either the ARCC Fund or the Affiliated Fund wishes to exit the investment, or make a Follow-On Investment in that portfolio company, and Section 57(a)(4) is implicated (those situations where Section 57(a)(4) was not implicated when the initial investments were made, but where Section 57(a)(4) is implicated in connection with the exit from, or additional acquisition of, such investment are referred to as "Joint Exit Transactions" and "Joint Follow-On Transactions," respectively), the following procedures must be followed to ensure fairness.
2. Ensuring Fairness in Joint Follow-On Transactions and Joint Exit Transactions.
Upon issuance of the requested Order, Joint Follow-On Transactions and Joint Exit Transactions may arise as described above. In connection with Joint Follow-On Transactions and Joint Exit Transactions, the following protocols are designed to ensure the fairness of those transactions to the participating ARCC Fund: (1) where each of an ARCC Fund and an Affiliated Fund holds the same investment, no Affiliated Fund or ARCC Fund will be permitted to engage in a Joint Exit Transaction or a Joint Follow-On Transaction without obtaining the approvals specified in (2) below unless each Affiliated Fund and each ARCC Fund disposes of its interest in such investment at the same time, for the same unit consideration, on the same terms and conditions, and in amounts proportionate to its respective holding of such investment; (2) where each of an ARCC Fund and an Affiliated Fund holds the same investment and the proposed participation of any Affiliated Fund or any ARCC Fund in a proposed Joint Exit Transaction or Joint Follow-On Transaction is disproportionate to its existing holding of such investment (except in situations where an investment manager of an ARCC Fund determines that the ARCC Fund should not participate in such proposed transaction), or if any investment manager of an ARCC Fund determines to dispose of such ARCC Fund's investment, then the ARCC Fund's investment manager (ACM in the case of ARCC) will formulate a recommendation as to the participation of the ARCC Fund in the proposed transaction and submit the recommendation to the Board, in the case of ARCC, or the Independent Party, in the case of a Downstream Managed Fund, to make a determination; (3) where an Affiliated Fund and an ARCC Fund hold different investments in the same issuer, the Affiliated Fund may not complete a Joint Follow-On Transaction unless the ARCC Fund that did not hold the investment in question is also offered the opportunity to invest in the same investment at the same time and for the same price; and (4) where an Affiliated Fund and an ARCC Fund hold different investments in the same issuer, the Affiliated Fund may sell, exchange, or otherwise dispose of its investment in such issuer in a Joint Exit Transaction only if the ARCC Fund that did not hold the investment in question is also offered the opportunity to exit its different investment in the same issuer.10 In connection with an ARCC Fund's determination to participate in any of the Joint Exit Transactions or Joint Follow-On Transactions described in (2) and (3) above, the Board of ARCC, or the Independent Party of the Downstream Managed Fund, as applicable, must make the same determination that it would be required to make in connection with the approval of a Basic Co-Investment Transaction, modified as appropriate to apply to dispositions and Follow-On Investments. In connection with an ARCC Fund's determination to participate in a Joint Exit Transaction as described in (4) above, if any investment manager of an ARCC Fund determines to dispose of such ARCC Fund's investment, then the Board of ARCC, or the Independent Party of the Downstream Managed Fund, as applicable, must make the same determination that it would be required to make in connection with the approval of a Basic Co-Investment Transaction, modified as appropriate to apply to dispositions.
14
F. RATIONALE FOR JOINT EXIT AND JOINT FOLLOW-ON TRANSACTIONS
As described above, an ARCC Fund and an Affiliated Fund may find themselves holding investments in the same portfolio company of the same or a different class, but where the respective acquisitions of those investments did not implicate the joint transaction proscriptions of Section 57(a)(4), and therefore the investments were not made through a Co-Investment Transaction. As the Co-Investment Transaction model is not implicated in these situations, a question arises as to how to ensure that an exit from or a Follow-On Investment in a portfolio company in this situation is made on terms that are fair and equitable and do not harm ARCC's shareholders or a Downstream Fund's interest holders, as applicable.
A method for exiting and completing Follow-On Investments in the described situation may be necessary because at times it will be in the best interests of the shareholders of ARCC and the interest holders of the Downstream Managed Funds to be able to exit from, and complete Follow-On Investments in, investments when an Affiliated Fund holds a different investment in the same issuer and the different investments were acquired under circumstances that did not implicate Section 57(a)(4). If the respective funds are not able to exit such investments or complete Follow-On Investments in respect of such investments, then the respective funds may be forced to hold an investment when it is no longer viewed as potentially accretive (in the case of exits) or when more attractive investment opportunities are available (in the case of Follow-On Investments).
With respect to Joint Follow-On Transactions, Applicants believe that the conditions set forth herein would provide appropriate protection. The fact that the Joint Follow-On Transaction would be effected at a time when the ARCC Fund and the Affiliated Fund already have respective positions in the portfolio company would seem to be ably addressed by the requirement that ARCC's Board, or the Independent Party of a Downstream Managed Fund, as applicable, make certain findings regarding the fact that the proposed Joint Follow-On Transaction is in the best interests of ARCC's shareholders or a Downstream Managed Fund's interest holders, as applicable.
With respect to Joint Exit Transactions, Applicants see no basis to impose greater restrictions than those that would be imposed under the traditional co-investment order templates. There will be times when it will be in the best interests of ARCC's shareholders, or a Downstream Managed Fund's interest holders, for the ARCC Fund to divest of a position also held by an Affiliated Fund. Assuming, as Applicants do here, that the ARCC Fund and the Affiliated Fund came to and have maintained their respective positions in the portfolio company separately (i.e., Section 57(a)(4) has not been implicated in their circumstances prior to seeking the disposition in question), the layering of additional conditions to a disposition would serve no shareholder protection or policy purpose. Stated differently, the fact that the various conditions typically imposed on the acquisition side of a co-investment program were not applicable to the disjointed acquisitions here should not impact or change the analysis. Those conditions have historically been imposed to ensure that investments made under circumstances which Congress in Section 57(a)(4) identified as presumptively abusivei.e., where a BDC and an affiliate are acting jointly by investing in the same issuer in some concerted waywere the subject of a protocol designed to prevent the abuse through specific limitations and proactive board involvement, as appropriate. Where, as here, no such presumptively abusive transaction has occurred as a predicate, imposition of the conditions would seem to gratuitously impose a burden for a problem that does not exist. As a result, Applicants believe that applying conditions to the exit or Follow-On Investment, as applicable, itself, but not adding any other additional conditions, appropriately protects the interests of ARCC's shareholders and the Downstream Managed Funds' interest holders.
15
G. APPLICABLE LAW
1. Sections 57(a)(4) and 57(i) of the Act, and Rule 17d-1 thereunder.
Section 57(a)(4) makes it unlawful for any person who is related to a BDC in a manner described in Section 57(b), acting as principal, knowingly to effect any transaction in which the BDC is a joint or a joint and several participant with that person in contravention of rules and regulations as the Commission may prescribe for the purpose of limiting or preventing participation by the BDC on a basis less advantageous than that of the other participant. Although the Commission has not adopted any rules expressly under Section 57(a)(4), Section 57(i) provides that the rules under Section 17(d) applicable to registered closed-end investment companies (e.g., Rule 17d-1) are, in the interim, deemed to apply to transactions subject to Section 57(a). Rule 17d-1, as made applicable to BDCs by Section 57(i), prohibits any person who is related to a BDC in a manner described in Section 57(b), as modified by Rule 57b-1, from acting as principal, from participating in, or effecting any transaction in connection with, any joint enterprise or other joint arrangement or profit-sharing plan in which the BDC is a participant, unless an application regarding the joint enterprise, arrangement, or profit-sharing plan has been filed with the Commission and has been granted by an order entered prior to the submission of the plan or any modification thereof, to security holders for approval, or prior to its adoption or modification if not so submitted.
2. Section 57(b) of the Act and Rule 57b-1 thereunder.
Section 57(b), as modified by Rule 57b-1, specifies the persons to whom the prohibitions of Section 57(a)(4) apply. These persons include the following: (1) any director, officer, employee, or member of an advisory board of a BDC or any person (other than the BDC itself) who is, within the meaning of Section 2(a)(3)(C), an affiliated person of any such person; or (2) any investment adviser or promoter of, general partner in, principal underwriter for, or person directly or indirectly either controlling, controlled by, or under common control with a BDC (except the BDC itself and any person who, if it were not directly or indirectly controlled by the BDC, would not be directly or indirectly under the control of a person who controls the BDC), or any person who is, within the meaning of Section 2(a)(3)(C) or (D) an affiliated person of such person.
Rule 57b-1 under the Act exempts certain persons otherwise related to a BDC in a manner described in Section 57(b)(2) of the Act from being subject to the prohibitions of Section 57(a). Specifically, this rule states that the provisions of Section 57(a) shall not apply to any person: (a) solely because that person is directly or indirectly controlled by a BDC, or (b) solely because that person is directly or indirectly controlling, controlled by, or under common control with a person described in (a) of the rule or is an officer, director, partner, copartner, or employee of a person described in (a) of the rule.
Section 2(a)(9) defines "control" as the power to exercise a controlling influence over the management or policies of a company, unless such power is solely the result of an official position with such company. The statute also sets forth the interpretation that any person who owns beneficially, either directly or through one or more controlled companies, more than 25 percent of the voting securities of a company shall be presumed to control such company; any person who does not so own more than 25 percent of the voting securities of a company shall be presumed not to control such company; and a natural person shall be presumed not to be a controlled person.
Sections 2(a)(3)(C) and (D) define an "affiliated person" of another person as: "(C) any person directly or indirectly controlling, controlled by, or under common control with, such other person; (D) any officer, director, partner, copartner, or employee of such other person."
16
3. Sections 57(c) and 57(a)(2).
Section 57(c) provides that the Commission will exempt a proposed transaction from Section 57(a) if the terms of the proposed transaction, including the consideration to be paid or received, are reasonable and fair and do not involve overreaching on the part of any person concerned; and the proposed transaction is consistent with the policy of the business development company concerned and consistent with the general purposes of the Act. Applicants believe that the requested relief from Section 57(a)(2) meets these standards for the reasons discussed below.
Section 57(a)(2) makes it unlawful for certain persons related to a BDC in the manner set forth in Section 57(b), acting as principal knowingly to purchase from the BDC or from any company controlled by the BDC any security (except securities of which the seller is the issuer).
H. NEED FOR RELIEF
Basic Co-Investment Transactions, Syndication Transactions, Joint Follow-On Transactions and Joint Exit Transactions would be prohibited by Section 57(a)(4) and Rule 17d-1 without a prior exemptive order of the Commission to the extent that the Affiliated Funds fall within the category of persons described by Section 57(b), as modified by Rule 57b-1 thereunder. The ARCC Funds and each of the Affiliated Funds may be deemed to be affiliated persons within the meaning of Section 2(a)(3) by reason of common control because (i) controlled Affiliates of Ares Management LLC manage each of the Affiliated Funds, (ii) Ares Management LLC controls ACM, which manages ARCC pursuant to the Investment Advisory Agreement and (iii) currently the Downstream Managed Funds are managed by, and pay advisory fees to, Ivy Hill Management (or, in the case of the Emporia Funds, A.C. Corp., and ARCC, in the case of AGILE Fund), and in the future one or more Downstream Managed Fund may be managed by certain of ARCC's subsidiaries. Thus, each of the Affiliated Funds could be deemed to be a person related to the ARCC Funds in a manner described by Section 57(b) and therefore prohibited by Section 57(a)(4) and Rule 17d-1 from participating in Basic Co-Investment Transactions, Syndication Transactions, Joint Follow-On Transactions and Joint Exit Transactions.
Further, those Syndication Transactions that are Principal Syndications, in which the ARCC Fund commits to acquire or acquires the full amount of a debt issuance from the issuer and then syndicates or sells a portion of it to an Affiliated Fund, could be prohibited by Section 57(a)(2) without a prior exemptive order of the Commission under Section 57(c). In those instances, the Affiliated Fund could be determined to knowingly purchase a security from a BDC.
I. REQUESTED RELIEF
Accordingly, Applicants respectfully request an Order of the Commission, subject to the terms set forth in the Application, pursuant to Sections 57(c) and 57(i) and Rule 17d-l to permit the ARCC Funds to participate in: (i) Basic Co-Investment Transactions; (ii) Syndication Transactions; (iii) Joint Follow-On Transactions; and (iv) Joint Exit Transactions.
J. APPLICANT'S LEGAL ANALYSIS
In accordance with Rule 17d-1 (made applicable to BDCs pursuant to Section 57(i)), the Commission may grant the requested relief as to any particular joint transaction if it finds that the participation of the ARCC Funds (or any person they control) in the joint transaction is consistent with the provisions, policies and purposes of the Act and is not on a basis different from or less advantageous than that of other participants.
As required by Rule 17d-1(b), the terms and conditions proposed in the Application ensure that the terms on which Basic Co-Investment Transactions, Syndication Transactions, Joint Follow-On Transactions and Joint Exit Transactions may be made are consistent with the participation of the
17
ARCC Funds being on a basis that it is neither different from nor less advantageous than other participants, thus protecting the shareholders or interest holders of any participant from being disadvantaged. For each Co-Investment Transaction, other than Syndication Transactions (which, as discussed above, will effectively be managed according to the needs of ARCC and, to the extent that they participate in such transactions, one or more of the Downstream Managed Funds), one or more of the ARCC Funds and one or more of the Affiliated Funds will be offered the opportunity to participate in the Co-Investment Transactions on identical terms and on a pro rata basis based on the total assets of the respective funds. Further, the terms and conditions will ensure that all Co-Investment Transactions are reasonable and fair to the ARCC Funds and the Affiliated Funds and do not involve overreaching by any person concerned, including ACM. The decision for ARCC to participate in any Co-Investment Transaction will be based on the recommendation of ACM and the approval of a required majority of the directors eligible to vote on the Co-Investment Transaction within the meaning of Section 57(o) (the "Eligible Directors") of ARCC's Board, or in the case of any Downstream Managed Fund, based on the recommendation of its investment manager and the approval of its Independent Party.
In addition, Section 57(c) authorizes the Commission to exempt a proposed transaction from Section 57(a)(2) if evidence establishes that: (1) the terms of the proposed transaction, including the consideration to be paid or received, are reasonable and fair and do not involve overreaching on the part of any person concerned; and (2) the proposed transaction is consistent with the policy of the business development company concerned and consistent with the general purposes of the Act. In the case of Syndication Transactions that are Principal Syndications and therefore implicate Section 57(a)(2), the ARCC Fund will only effect such syndication if ARCC's Board or Independent Party, as applicable, after appropriate consideration, approves it. As a result, the terms of these transactions, including the consideration to be paid or received, are by definition reasonable and fair and do not involve overreaching.
K. PRECEDENTS
The Commission has granted co-investment relief on numerous occasions in recent years.11 Although allocation formulae, approval procedures and presumptions may differ in detail as a result of circumstances and structures being different for each applicant, Applicants submit that the formulae and procedures set forth as conditions for the relief requested herein are consistent with the range of investor protection found in the cited orders.
18
L. CONDITIONS
Applicants agree that any order granting the requested relief will be subject to the following conditions:
Access Capital Strategies Community Investment Fund. Inc. (File No. 812-9786), Release No. IC-21898 (Apr. 16, 1996) (order), Release No. IC-21836 (Mar. 20, 1996) (notice); Ridgewood Electric Power Trust III (File No. 812-9558), Release No. IC-21589 (Dec. 11, 1995) (order), Release No. IC-21472 (Nov. 3, 1995) (notice); MAC Private Equities Inc., (File No. 812-9028), Release No. IC20887 (Feb. 7, 1995) (order), Release No. IC-20831 (Jan. 12, 1995) (notice); Corporate Renaissance Group, Inc. (File No. 812-8978), Release No. IC-20690 (Nov. 8, 1994) (order), Release No. IC-20617 (Oct. 13, 1994) (notice); ML Venture, Partners II. L.P. (File No. 812-7841), Release No. IC-18700 (May 11, 1992) (order), Release No. IC-18652 (Apr. 13, 1992) (notice); Equus Capital Partners. L.P. (File No. 812-7272), Release No. IC-18105 (Apr. 18, 1991) (order), Release No. IC-18058 (Mar. 21, 1991) (notice); Equitable Capital, Partners, L.P. (File No. 812-7328), Release No. IC-17925 (Dec. 31, 1990) (order), Release No. IC-17894 (Dec. 5, 1990) (notice); Technology Funding Partners III, L.P. (File No. 812-7355), Release No. IC-17571 (July 5, 1990) (order), Release No. IC-17523 (June 6, 1990) (notice); Berkshire, Partners III, L.P., (File No. 812-7335), Release No. IC-17533 (June 14, 1990) (order), Release No. IC-17496 (May 17, 1990) (notice); ML-Lee Acquisition Fund II, L.P., (File No. 812-7133), Release No. IC-17123 (Sept. 1, 1989) (order), Release No. IC-17101 (Aug. 7, 1989) (notice); The Prospect Group Opportunity Fund, Inc., (File No. 812-7024), Release No. IC16841 (Feb. 27, 1989) (order), Release No. IC-16774 (Jan. 24, 1989) (notice).
19
20
21
22
23
A. COMMUNICATIONS
Please address all communications concerning this Application and the Notice and Order to:
Michael
Arougheti
President
Ares Capital Corporation
280 Park Avenue, 22nd Floor
Building East
New York, NY 10017
(212) 750-7300
and
Michael
Weiner
General Counsel
Ares Management LLC
2000 Avenue of the Stars, 12th Floor
Los Angeles, CA 90067
(310) 201-4200
and
Joshua
M. Bloomstein
General Counsel
Ares Capital Corporation
280 Park Avenue, 22nd Floor
Building East
New York, NY 10017
(212) 750-7300
Please address any questions, and a copy of any communications, concerning this Application, the Notice and Order to:
Monica
Shilling
Proskauer Rose LLP
2049 Century Park East, 32nd Floor
Los Angeles, CA 90067
(310) 557-2900
and
Steven
B. Boehm
Sutherland Asbill & Brennan LLP
1275 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20004
(202) 383-0100
24
B. AUTHORIZATION
Pursuant to Rule 0-2(c) under the Act, Applicants hereby state that ARCC, by resolutions duly adopted by its Board on October 29, 2008 (attached hereto as Exhibit A), has authorized its officers to cause to be prepared and to execute and file with the Commission an application and any amendment thereto under Sections 57(c) and 57(i) of the Act and Rule 17d-1 under the Act, for an order authorizing certain joint transactions that may otherwise be prohibited under Sections 57(a)(2) and 57(a)(4) of such Act (the "Application"). Each person executing the application on behalf of the ARCC Funds and Affiliated Funds being duly sworn deposes and says that he has duly executed the attached Application for and on behalf of the applicable ARCC Fund or Affiliated Fund; that he is authorized to execute the Application pursuant to the terms of an operating agreement, management agreement or otherwise; and that all actions by members, directors or other bodies necessary to authorize each such deponent to execute and file the Application have been taken.
25
All requirements for the execution and filing of this Application in the name and on behalf of each Applicant by the undersigned have been complied with and the undersigned is fully authorized to do so and has duly executed this Application this 23rd day of August, 2010.
ARES CAPITAL CORPORATION | ||||
By: |
/s/ Joshua M. Bloomstein |
|||
Name: Joshua M. Bloomstein | ||||
Title: General Counsel |
ARES CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LLC, ARES MANAGEMENT LLC, ARES MANAGEMENT LIMITED, ARES MANAGEMENT, L.P., ARES MANAGEMENT II, L.P., ARES INSTITUTIONAL LOAN FUND GP, LLC, ARES CLO MANAGEMENT IIR, L.P., ARES CLO MANAGEMENT IIIR/IVR, L.P., ARES CLO MANAGEMENT VR, L.P., ARES CLO MANAGEMENT VIR, L.P., ARES CLO MANAGEMENT VII, L.P., ARES CLO MANAGEMENT VIII, L.P., ARES CLO MANAGEMENT IX, L.P., ARES CLO MANAGEMENT X, L.P., ARES CLO MANAGEMENT XI, L.P., ARES CLO MANAGEMENT XII, L.P., ARES NF CLO XIII MANAGEMENT, L.P., ARES NF CLO XIV MANAGEMENT, L.P., ARES NF CLO XV MANAGEMENT, L.P., ARES ENHANCED LOAN MANAGEMENT, L.P., ARES ENHANCED LOAN MANAGEMENT IR, L.P., ARES ENHANCED LOAN MANAGEMENT IR-B, L.P., ARES ENHANCED LOAN MANAGEMENT II, L.P., ARES ENHANCED LOAN MANAGEMENT III, L.P., ARES ENHANCED LOAN INVESTMENT STRATEGY ADVISOR IV, L.P., ASSF OPERATING MANAGER II, LLC, ASSF MANAGEMENT II, L.P., ARES SPC HOLDINGS, L.P., ARES SPC HOLDINGS GP LLC, ARES HIGH YIELD CSO MANAGEMENT, L.P., ARES HIGH YIELD CSO MANAGEMENT II, L.P., |
26
ARES PRIVATE ACCOUNT MANAGEMENT I, L.P., ARES ENHANCED CREDIT OPPORTUNITIES GP, LLC, ARES ENHANCED CREDIT OPPORTUNITIES FUND MANAGEMENT, L.P., ASSF OPERATING MANAGER, LLC, ARES CSF OPERATING MANAGER I, LLC, ARES CSF OPERATING MANAGER II, LLC, ACOF OPERATING MANAGER, L.P., ACOF OPERATING MANAGER II, L.P., ACOF OPERATING MANAGER III, LLC, ARES CAPITAL EURO GP, L.P., ARES STRATEGIC INVESTMENT GP, LLC, ARES STRATEGIC INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT LLC, ARES ASIA MANAGEMENT, LTD., ARES ASIA MANAGEMENT (HK), LIMITED, IVY HILL ASSET MANAGEMENT L.P., IHSM LLC, ACKB LLC, A.C. CORPORATION, ARES LEVERAGED INVESTMENT FUND (U.S.), L.P., ARES LEVERAGED INVESTMENT FUND (CAYMAN), L.P., ARES LEVERAGED INVESTMENT FUND, L.P., ARES LEVERAGED INVESTMENT CORP., ARES LEVERAGED INVESTMENT FUND II, L.P., ARES LEVERAGED INVESTMENT CORP. II, ARES INSTITUTIONAL OFFSHORE LOAN FUND, B.V., ARES INSTITUTIONAL LOAN FUND, L.P., ARES INSTITUTIONAL LOAN FUND B.V., ARES IIR CLO LTD., ARES III CLO LTD., ARES IIIR/IVR CLO LTD., ARES V CLO LTD., ARES VR CLO LTD., ARES VI CLO LTD., ARES VIR CLO LTD., ARES VII CLO LTD., ARES VIII CLO LTD., ARES IX CLO LTD., ARES X CLO LTD., ARES XI CLO LTD., ARES XII CLO LTD., ARES EURO CLO I B.V., ARES EUROPEAN CLO II B.V., ARES NF CLO XIII LTD., ARES NF CLO XIV LTD., ARES NF CLO XV LTD., ARES ENHANCED LOAN INVESTMENT STRATEGY, LTD., ARES ENHANCED LOAN INVESTMENT STRATEGY IR LTD., ARES ENHANCED LOAN INVESTMENT STRATEGY IR-B, LTD., ARES ENHANCED LOAN INVESTMENT STRATEGY II LTD., ARES ENHANCED LOAN INVESTMENT STRATEGY III, LTD., ARES ENHANCED LOAN INVESTMENT STRATEGY III EURO B.V., |
27
ARES ENHANCED LOAN INVESTMENT STRATEGY V B.V., ARES ENHANCED LOAN INVESTMENT STRATEGY VI, L.P., ARES SPC LUXEMBOURG S.À.R.L., ARES HIGH YIELD CSO I PLC, ARES HIGH YIELD CSO LTD., CONFLUENT 2 LIMITED, ARES ENHANCED CREDIT OPPORTUNITIES FUND, L.P., ARES ENHANCED CREDIT OPPORTUNITIES OFFSHORE FUND, LTD., ARES ENHANCED CREDIT OPPORTUNITIES MASTER FUND, L.P., ARES ENHANCED CREDIT OPPORTUNITIES FUND LTD., GLOBAL LOAN OPPORTUNITIES FUND B.V., ARES SPECIAL SITUATIONS FUND, L.P., DF US BD HOLDINGS LLC, ARES SPECIAL SITUATIONS FUND I-B, L.P., DF US BD HOLDINGS I-B LLC, ARES CREDIT STRATEGIES FUND I, L.P., ARES CREDIT STRATEGIES FUND II, L.P., ARES CORPORATE OPPORTUNITIES FUND, L.P., ARES CORPORATE OPPORTUNITIES FUND II, L.P., ARES CORPORATE OPPORTUNITIES FUND III, L.P., AF I US BD HOLDINGS L.P., AF II US BD HOLDINGS L.P., AF III US BD HOLDINGS L.P., ARES CAPITAL EUROPE LIMITED, ARES CAPITAL EUROPEAN INVESTMENTS LIMITED, ARES CAPITAL EUROPE, L.P., ARES CAPITAL EUROPE (LUXEMBOURG) S.À.R.L., ARES STRATEGIC INVESTMENT PARTNERS LTD., ARES STRATEGIC INVESTMENT PARTNERS OFFSHORE LTD., ARES STRATEGIC INVESTMENT PARTNERS EUROPE B.V., ARES STRATEGIC INVESTMENT PARTNERS, L.P., ARES CORPORATE OPPORTUNITIES FUND ASIA, L.P., IVY HILL MIDDLE MARKET CREDIT FUND, LTD., IVY HILL MIDDLE MARKET CREDIT FUND II, LTD., IVY HILL SENIOR DEBT FUND, L.P., IVY HILL SENIOR DEBT FUNDING 2007-1, IVY HILL SENIOR DEBT FUND, LTD., COLTS 2005-1 LTD., COLTS 2005-2 LTD., COLTS 2007-1 LTD., FIRSTLIGHT FUNDING I, LTD., |
28
KNIGHTSBRIDGE CLO 2007-1 LIMITED, KNIGHTSBRIDGE CLO 2008-1 LIMITED, EMPORIA PREFERRED FUNDING I, LTD., EMPORIA PREFERRED FUNDING II, LTD., EMPORIA PREFERRED FUNDING III, LTD., AGILE FUND I, LLC | ||||
By: |
/s/ Joshua M. Bloomstein |
|||
Name: Joshua M. Bloomstein | ||||
Authorized Person |
29
STATE OF NEW YORK | ) | |
)ss: | ||
COUNTY OF NEW YORK | ) |
The undersigned, being duly sworn, deposes and states that he has duly executed the foregoing Application, dated August 23, 2010, for and on behalf of Ares Capital Corporation, that he is the Vice President and General Counsel of such entity and that all action by the directors and shareholders of such entity necessary to authorize the undersigned to execute and file such instrument has been taken. Deponent further states that he is familiar with such instrument and the contents thereof and that the facts set forth therein are true to the best of his knowledge, information and belief.
ARES CAPITAL CORPORATION | ||||
By: |
/s/ Joshua M. Bloomstein Name: Joshua M. Bloomstein Title: General Counsel |
1
STATE OF CALIFORNIA | ) | |
)ss: | ||
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES | ) |
The undersigned, being duly sworn, deposes and states that he has duly executed the foregoing Application, dated August 23, 2010, for and on behalf of Ares Capital Management LLC, Ares Management LLC, Ares Management Limited, Ares Management, L.P., Ares Management II, L.P., Ares Institutional Loan Fund GP, LLC, Ares CLO Management IIR, L.P., Ares CLO Management IIIR/IVR, L.P., Ares CLO Management VR, L.P., Ares CLO Management VIR, L.P., Ares CLO Management VII, L.P., Ares CLO Management VIII, L.P., Ares CLO Management IX, L.P., Ares CLO Management X, L.P., Ares CLO Management XI, L.P., Ares CLO Management XII, L.P., Ares NF CLO XIII Management, L.P., Ares NF CLO XIV Management, L.P., Ares NF CLO XV Management, L.P., Ares Enhanced Loan Management, L.P., Ares Enhanced Loan Management IR, L.P., Ares Enhanced Loan Management IR-B, L.P., Ares Enhanced Loan Management II, L.P., Ares Enhanced Loan Management III, L.P., Ares Enhanced Loan Investment Strategy Advisor IV, L.P., ASSF Operating Manager II, LLC, ASSF Management II, L.P., Ares SPC Holdings, L.P., Ares SPC Holdings GP LLC, Ares High Yield CSO Management, L.P., Ares High Yield CSO Management II, L.P., Ares Private Account Management I, L.P., Ares Enhanced Credit Opportunities GP, LLC, Ares Enhanced Credit Opportunities Fund Management, L.P., ASSF Operating Manager, LLC, Ares CSF Operating Manager I, LLC, Ares CSF Operating Manager II, LLC, ACOF Operating Manager, L.P., ACOF Operating Manager II, L.P., ACOF Operating Manager III LLC, Ares Capital Euro GP, L.P., Ares Strategic Investment GP, LLC, Ares Strategic Investment Management LLC, Ares Asia Management, Ltd., Ares Asia Management (HK), Limited, Ivy Hill Asset Management L.P., IHSM LLC, ACKB LLC, A.C. Corporation, Ares Leveraged Investment Fund (U.S.), L.P., Ares Leveraged Investment Fund (Cayman), L.P., Ares Leveraged Investment Fund, L.P., Ares Leveraged Investment Corp., Ares Leveraged Investment Fund II, L.P., Ares Leveraged Investment Corp. II, Ares Institutional Offshore Loan Fund, B.V., Ares Institutional Loan Fund, L.P., Ares Institutional Loan Fund B.V., Ares IIR CLO Ltd., Ares III CLO Ltd., Ares IIIR/IVR CLO Ltd., Ares V CLO Ltd., Ares VR CLO Ltd., Ares VI CLO Ltd., Ares VIR CLO Ltd., Ares VII CLO Ltd., Ares VIII CLO Ltd., Ares IX CLO Ltd., Ares X CLO Ltd., Ares XI CLO Ltd., Ares XII CLO Ltd., Ares Euro CLO I B.V., Ares European CLO II B.V., Ares NF CLO XIII Ltd., Ares NF CLO XIV Ltd., Ares NF CLO XV Ltd., Ares Enhanced Loan Investment Strategy, Ltd., Ares Enhanced Loan Investment Strategy IR Ltd., Ares Enhanced Loan Investment Strategy IR-B, Ltd., Ares Enhanced Loan Investment Strategy II Ltd., Ares Enhanced Loan Investment Strategy III, Ltd., Ares Enhanced Loan Investment Strategy III Euro B.V., Ares Enhanced Loan Investment Strategy V B.V., Ares Enhanced Loan Investment Strategy VI, L.P., Ares SPC Luxembourg S.À.R.L., Ares High Yield CSO I PLC, Ares High Yield CSO Ltd., Confluent 2 Limited, Ares Enhanced Credit Opportunities Fund, L.P., Ares Enhanced Credit Opportunities Offshore Fund, LTD., Ares Enhanced Credit Opportunities Master Fund, L.P., Ares Enhanced Credit Opportunities Fund Ltd., Global Loan Opportunities Fund B.V., Ares Special Situations Fund, L.P., DF US BD Holdings LLC, Ares Special Situations Fund I-B, L.P., DF US BD Holdings I-B LLC, Ares Credit Strategies Fund I, L.P., Ares Credit Strategies Fund II, L.P., Ares Corporate Opportunities Fund, L.P., Ares Corporate Opportunities Fund II, L.P., Ares Corporate Opportunities Fund III, L.P., AF I US BD Holdings L.P., AF II US BD Holdings L.P., AF III US BD Holdings L.P., Ares Capital Europe Limited, Ares Capital European Investments Limited, Ares Capital Europe, L.P., Ares Capital Europe (Luxembourg) S.À.R.L., Ares Strategic Investment Partners Ltd., Ares Strategic Investment Partners Offshore Ltd., Ares Strategic Investment Partners Europe B.V., Ares Strategic Investment Partners, L.P., Ares Corporate Opportunities Fund Asia, L.P., Ivy Hill Middle Market Credit Fund, Ltd., Ivy Hill Middle Market Credit Fund II, Ltd., Ivy Hill Senior Debt Fund, L.P., Ivy Hill Senior Debt Funding 2007-1, Ivy Hill Senior Debt Fund, Ltd., CoLTS 2005-1 Ltd., CoLTS 2005-2 Ltd., CoLTS 2007-1 Ltd., Firstlight Funding I, Ltd., Knightsbridge CLO 2007-1 Limited,
2
Knightsbridge CLO 2008-1 Limited, Emporia Preferred Funding I, Ltd., Emporia Preferred Funding II, Ltd., Emporia Preferred Funding III, Ltd., and AGILE Fund I, LLC, that he is authorized to execute this sworn statement of each entity and that all action by the directors, shareholders, general partners, trustees or members of each entity, as applicable, necessary to authorize the undersigned to execute and file such instrument has been taken. Deponent further states that he is familiar with such instrument and the contents thereof and that the facts set forth therein are true to the best of his knowledge, information and belief.
ARES CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LLC, ARES MANAGEMENT LLC, ARES MANAGEMENT LIMITED, ARES MANAGEMENT, L.P., ARES MANAGEMENT II, L.P., ARES INSTITUTIONAL LOAN FUND GP, LLC, ARES CLO MANAGEMENT IIR, L.P., ARES CLO MANAGEMENT IIIR/IVR, L.P., ARES CLO MANAGEMENT VR, L.P., ARES CLO MANAGEMENT VIR, L.P., ARES CLO MANAGEMENT VII, L.P., ARES CLO MANAGEMENT VIII, L.P., ARES CLO MANAGEMENT IX, L.P., ARES CLO MANAGEMENT X, L.P., ARES CLO MANAGEMENT XI, L.P., ARES CLO MANAGEMENT XII, L.P., ARES NF CLO XIII MANAGEMENT, L.P., ARES NF CLO XIV MANAGEMENT, L.P., ARES NF CLO XV MANAGEMENT, L.P., ARES ENHANCED LOAN MANAGEMENT, L.P., ARES ENHANCED LOAN MANAGEMENT IR, L.P., ARES ENHANCED LOAN MANAGEMENT IR-B, L.P., ARES ENHANCED LOAN MANAGEMENT II, L.P., ARES ENHANCED LOAN MANAGEMENT III, L.P., ARES ENHANCED LOAN INVESTMENT STRATEGY ADVISOR IV, L.P., ASSF OPERATING MANAGER II, LLC, ASSF MANAGEMENT II, L.P., ARES SPC HOLDINGS, L.P., ARES SPC HOLDINGS GP LLC, ARES HIGH YIELD CSO MANAGEMENT, L.P., ARES HIGH YIELD CSO MANAGEMENT II, L.P., ARES PRIVATE ACCOUNT MANAGEMENT I, L.P., ARES ENHANCED CREDIT OPPORTUNITIES GP, LLC, ARES ENHANCED CREDIT OPPORTUNITIES FUND MANAGEMENT, L.P., ASSF OPERATING MANAGER, LLC, ARES CSF OPERATING MANAGER I, LLC, ARES CSF OPERATING MANAGER II, LLC, ACOF OPERATING MANAGER, L.P., ACOF OPERATING MANAGER II, L.P., ACOF OPERATING MANAGER III, LLC, |
3
ARES CAPITAL EURO GP, L.P., ARES STRATEGIC INVESTMENT GP, LLC, ARES STRATEGIC INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT LLC, ARES ASIA MANAGEMENT, LTD., ARES ASIA MANAGEMENT (HK), LIMITED, IVY HILL ASSET MANAGEMENT L.P., IHSM LLC, ACKB LLC, A.C. CORPORATION, ARES LEVERAGED INVESTMENT FUND (U.S.), L.P., ARES LEVERAGED INVESTMENT FUND (CAYMAN), L.P., ARES LEVERAGED INVESTMENT FUND, L.P., ARES LEVERAGED INVESTMENT CORP., ARES LEVERAGED INVESTMENT FUND II, L.P., ARES LEVERAGED INVESTMENT CORP. II, ARES INSTITUTIONAL OFFSHORE LOAN FUND, B.V., ARES INSTITUTIONAL LOAN FUND, L.P., ARES INSTITUTIONAL LOAN FUND B.V., ARES IIR CLO LTD., ARES III CLO LTD., ARES IIIR/IVR CLO LTD., ARES V CLO LTD., ARES VR CLO LTD., ARES VI CLO LTD., ARES VIR CLO LTD., ARES VII CLO LTD., ARES VIII CLO LTD., ARES IX CLO LTD., ARES X CLO LTD., ARES XI CLO LTD., ARES XII CLO LTD., ARES EURO CLO I B.V., ARES EUROPEAN CLO II B.V., ARES NF CLO XIII LTD., ARES NF CLO XIV LTD., ARES NF CLO XV LTD., ARES ENHANCED LOAN INVESTMENT STRATEGY, LTD., ARES ENHANCED LOAN INVESTMENT STRATEGY IR LTD., ARES ENHANCED LOAN INVESTMENT STRATEGY IR-B, LTD., ARES ENHANCED LOAN INVESTMENT STRATEGY II LTD., ARES ENHANCED LOAN INVESTMENT STRATEGY III, LTD., ARES ENHANCED LOAN INVESTMENT STRATEGY III EURO B.V., ARES ENHANCED LOAN INVESTMENT STRATEGY V B.V., ARES ENHANCED LOAN INVESTMENT STRATEGY VI, L.P., ARES SPC LUXEMBOURG S.À.R.L., ARES HIGH YIELD CSO I PLC, ARES HIGH YIELD CSO LTD., CONFLUENT 2 LIMITED, ARES ENHANCED CREDIT OPPORTUNITIES FUND, L.P., ARES ENHANCED CREDIT OPPORTUNITIES OFFSHORE FUND, LTD., ARES ENHANCED CREDIT OPPORTUNITIES MASTER FUND, L.P., ARES ENHANCED CREDIT OPPORTUNITIES FUND LTD., |
4
GLOBAL LOAN OPPORTUNITIES FUND B.V., ARES SPECIAL SITUATIONS FUND, L.P., DF US BD HOLDINGS LLC, ARES SPECIAL SITUATIONS FUND I-B, L.P., DF US BD HOLDINGS I-B LLC, ARES CREDIT STRATEGIES FUND I, L.P., ARES CREDIT STRATEGIES FUND II, L.P., ARES CORPORATE OPPORTUNITIES FUND, L.P., ARES CORPORATE OPPORTUNITIES FUND II, L.P., ARES CORPORATE OPPORTUNITIES FUND III, L.P., AF I US BD HOLDINGS L.P., AF II US BD HOLDINGS L.P., AF III US BD HOLDINGS L.P., ARES CAPITAL EUROPE LIMITED, ARES CAPITAL EUROPEAN INVESTMENTS LIMITED, ARES CAPITAL EUROPE, L.P., ARES CAPITAL EUROPE (LUXEMBOURG) S.À.R.L., ARES STRATEGIC INVESTMENT PARTNERS LTD., ARES STRATEGIC INVESTMENT PARTNERS OFFSHORE LTD., ARES STRATEGIC INVESTMENT PARTNERS EUROPE B.V., ARES STRATEGIC INVESTMENT PARTNERS, L.P., ARES CORPORATE OPPORTUNITIES FUND ASIA, L.P., IVY HILL MIDDLE MARKET CREDIT FUND, LTD., IVY HILL MIDDLE MARKET CREDIT FUND II, LTD., IVY HILL SENIOR DEBT FUND, L.P., IVY HILL SENIOR DEBT FUNDING 2007-1, IVY HILL SENIOR DEBT FUND, LTD., COLTS 2005-1 LTD., COLTS 2005-2 LTD., COLTS 2007-1 LTD., FIRSTLIGHT FUNDING I, LTD., KNIGHTSBRIDGE CLO 2007-1 LIMITED, KNIGHTSBRIDGE CLO 2008-1 LIMITED, EMPORIA PREFERRED FUNDING I, LTD., EMPORIA PREFERRED FUNDING II, LTD., EMPORIA PREFERRED FUNDING III, LTD., AGILE FUND I, LLC | ||||
By: |
/s/ Joshua M. Bloomstein Name: Joshua M. Bloomstein Authorized Person |
5
Resolutions of the Board of Directors of
Ares Capital Corporation
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the officers (the "Officers") of Ares Capital Corporation (the "Corporation") be, and they hereby are, authorized, empowered and directed, in the name and on behalf of the Corporation, to cause to be prepared, executed, delivered and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Commission") an application for an order pursuant to Section 57(i) of the Investment Company Act and Rule 17d-l promulgated under the Investment Company Act of 1940 (an "Application"), to authorize the entering into of certain joint transactions and co-investments by the Corporation with certain entities which may be deemed to be "affiliates" of the Corporation pursuant to the provisions of the Investment Company Act of 1940, which such joint transactions and co-investments would otherwise be prohibited by Section 57(a)(4) of the Investment Company Act of 1940, and to do such other acts or things and execute such other documents as they deem necessary or desirable to cause such application to comply with the Investment Company Act of 1940 and the rules and regulations promulgated thereunder, in such form and accompanied by such exhibits and other documents, as the Officer or Officers preparing the same shall approve, such approval to be conclusively evidenced by the filing of the Application;
RESOLVED FURTHER, that a Policy on Transactions with Affiliates statement substantially in a form restating the conditions set forth in Section III of the Application as finally approved by the Commission is hereby approved and will be adopted, upon final approval of the Application by the Commission, in all respects as a policy of the Corporation and the Officers be, and they hereby are, authorized, empowered and directed, in the name and on behalf of the Corporation, to take such action as they shall deem necessary or desirable to formalize such policies and streamline the approval process for co-investment transactions with affiliates of the Corporation, in such form as the Officer or Officers preparing the same shall approve, such approval to be conclusively evidenced by the taking of any such action;
RESOLVED FURTHER, that the Officers be, and each of them acting alone hereby is, authorized and directed to file such additional Applications as such officers, in their sole discretion, shall deem necessary or desirable in order for the Corporation to accomplish its investment objective; and
RESOLVED FURTHER, that the Officers be, and each of them hereby is, authorized, empowered and directed, in the name and on behalf of the Corporation, to perform all of the agreements and obligations of the Corporation in connection with the foregoing resolutions and to consummate the transactions contemplated thereby, to take or cause to be taken any and all further actions, to execute and deliver, or cause to be executed and delivered, all other documents, instruments, agreements, undertakings, and certificates of any kind and nature whatsoever, to incur and pay all fees and expenses and to engage such persons as the Officer or Officers may determine to be necessary, advisable or appropriate to effectuate or carry out the purposes and intent of the foregoing resolutions, and the execution by the Officer or Officers of any such documents, instruments, agreements, undertakings and certificates, the payment of any fees and expenses or the engagement of such persons or the taking by them of any action in connection with the foregoing matters shall conclusively establish the Officer's or Officers' authority therefor and the authorization, acceptance, adoption, ratification, approval and confirmation by the Corporation thereof.
(Adopted by Unanimous Written Consent dated October 29, 2008)
A-1